12-R-55 Authorizing adoption of the Hazard Mitigation Plan for AACOGRESOLUTION NO. 12-R-55
A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF THE HAZARD
MITIGATION PLAN FOR AACOG, AND OTHER MATTERS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH
WHEREAS, certain areas of the City of Schertz are subject to periodic flooding and
other natural hazards with the potential to cause damages to people and properties within the
area, and
WHEREAS, the City of Schertz desires to prepare and mitigate for such circumstances,
and
WHEREAS, under the Disaster Mitigation Act of 2000 the United States Federal
Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) requires that a local jurisdiction have in place a
FEMA-approved Hazard Mitigation Action Plan as a condition of receipt of certain future
Federal mitigation funding, and
WHEREAS, to assist cities and counties in meeting this requirement, the Alamo Area
Council of Governments (AACOG), has initiated development of a regional, multijurisdictional
Hazard Mitigation Action Plan including the City of Schertz, and
WHEREAS, the City of Schertz posted the Hazard Mitigation Plan for the AACOG
Region for public review and comments for a period of 14 days ending May 23, 2012, and
received none, and
WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City") has recommended that the
City adopt the Regional Hazard Mitigation Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to
adopt the Hazard Mitigation Plan for the AACOG Region.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS
THAT:
Section 1. The City Council hereby adopts those portions of the Hazard Mitigation
Plan that pertain to the City of Schertz, and vests the Mayor with the authority, and the means to:
(a) Inform all concerned parties of this actions.
(b) Develop an addendum to this Hazard Mitigation Plan of the town's unique
situation warrants such an addendum
(c) Assure that the Hazard Mitigation Plan be reviewed at least annually and
that any needed adjustment be developed and presented to the Schertz City
Council for consideration.
(d) Agree to take such other official action as may be reasonably necessary to
carry out the objectives of the Hazard Mitigation Plan.
Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true,
and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for al] purposes and are adopted as a
part of the judgment and findings of the City Council.
Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with
any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the
provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein.
Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the
laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America.
Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person
or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application
of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City
Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid
provision.
Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which
this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject
matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was
given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended.
Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final
passage, and it is so resolved.
PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 19"' day of June, 2012.
ATTEST:
Cr ecretarv
(CITY SEAL)
CITY OF RTZ, TEXAS
Mayor Pro- em
sosoczzr.r _ 2 _
~~111®ra11d.UY11 SCHERTZ IRE ®EPARTMENT
Date: June 18, 2012
To: David Covington, Fire Chief / /,~^~~ /
John Kessel, City Manager 10/vf/ !i
Erom: Glen Outlaw, Assistant Fire Chie ~~
Subject: 2012 SHSP Eligibility Verification
Background: In April 2012, the city manager approved submission of a State
Homeland Security Program (SHSP) grant application, in the amount of $5320.00,
for the replacement of expired chemical and biological detection sensors. No
matching funds are required. The application was approved by the AACOG
Regional Emergency Preparedness Advisory Committee (REPAC) and submitted to
the State Administrative Agency (SAA) for funding.
Eligibility Certification: In order to receive SHSP grant funding, the City
must meet certain eligibility requirements established by the SAA. These
requirements are listed on the attached "2012 Eligibility Certification Form"
provided by the SAA. Using this form, the chief elected official, chief
executive officer, or chief financial officer certifies that the jurisdiction
(in this case, the City) meets all of the requirements. I have verified that
the City of Schertz meets all of the eligibility requirements and have
included documentation showing compliance. The completed certification form
and supporting documentation must be submitted to the SAA no later than July
2, 2012.
Recommendation: I recommend the city manager, as the chief executive officer,
initial the indicated blocks on the certification form, sign and date the form
on Page 3, and return the form to me for submission to the SAA.
NorE• This worksheet is saved and protected as a form; areas are navigated by tabbing from one text field to the next
To tab back to a previous field, press Shift t Tab. The boxes for text fields will expand ifnecessary as you type.
Jurisdiction: ~ City of Schertz
Point of Contact:
Title:
Phone:
Glen Outlaw
Assistant Fire Chief
~ 210-619-1300 Email: goutlaw@schertz.com
Check Compliance with FY12 Program Specific Priorities:
® Building and Sustaining Core Capabilities as defined in the National Preparedness Guidelines (NPG).
^ Building and Sustaining Law Enforcement Terrorism Prevention Capabilities.
^ Maturation and Enhancement of State and Major Urban Area Fusion Center.
1. Proiect Name
CBRNE Detection, WMD, Hazmat
(Double Click in box for project name drop down)
~. Needs to be addressed by this Proiect (Why is this project needed?Include the What, Where and Why)
Replacement of expired CBRNE/WMD/Hazmat detection sensors (Draeger tubes & BADD biological
detection sets)
3. Proiect Description (How will the needs be met? me/uriP rhA ina,., mih~f ~n.ra..,, ,,,,/ ~../...:_ ~___..,_.,
____ _.._ ...._, ......y v........ w... vvuy nv uc~c/glut//~
Replacement of the expired sensors restores first responder capability to detect the presence of
CBRNE/WMD/Hazmat materials.
4. New or Existing Proiect9
® New project
^ Existing project (Describe how this is an enhancement, expansion, addition, etc. of an existing project in
"Notes" field.)
^ Emergency (Describe circumstances in °Notes" field.)
Notes
Original detection devices were funded by 2004 SHSG. First replacements funded by 2006 SHSG.
5. Regional Ymoact (Identify the investment strategies addressed by the project How does this project enhance
regional preparedness?)
Schertz Fire Rescue provides mutual aid response to all Randolph Metrocom communities and is a
member of the AACOG Regional Mutual Aid Agreement.
6. Local Investment(Exp/aintheeffortrelatedtotheproject,indudingintegrationorenhancementofcurrentservices,
project management, etc.)
Local funds are unavailable in the current budget.
AACOG Project Funding Request Form FY2012 -1 - February 23, 2012
7. Proiect Scalabilit~ (Explain whether this project is being done as a single component or in phases)
® One-time project
^ Phased project (Describe previous funding in "Notes" field.)
Notes:
Quantities and types of detection devices can be adjusted in response to less than full funding. Less
than full funding will result in a limited response capability.
8. Proiect Sustainability (Explain yourjurisdiction's plan for sustaining this project-maintenance, upgrades,
calibration, etc.)
Every effort will be made to include future replacement of perishable detectors in the local budget.
9. 8uduet (Include as much detail as possible):
The expenditure categories are Equipment, P/arming, Organization, Training, and Exercises These maybe chosen from
the drop-down list (the defau/t is "Equipment.
Category Unit
AEL C®®E and Item (Select from listl nuawr~r.. ,.,.~E
`Dotal
/Pel-.-~_~-J•
076D-Ol-KFAS
E ui ment 3 """
400.00 ''°"'"1WL'"
$1200
00
07BD-Ol-KFAS E ui ment 1 350.00 .
$ 350
00
07CD-01-KCTC E ui ment 8 225.00 .
$1
800
00
07CD-01-KCTC E ui ment S 105.00 ,
.
525
00
07CD-Ol-MONO E ui ment 17 85.00 .
$1 445.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
Equipment $ 0.00
M&A (if applicable, not to exceed 3%)
r $ 0.00
otal (Right c/ick .$ fie/d. Se%ct "Update Fie/d,')
AACOG Project Funding Request Form FY2012 - 2 -
$5,320.00
February 23, 2012
1®. ®isciolines Involved in the Ps°oiect (P/ease indicate the percenfage offunds expected to be a/located in each
discipline. Use all disciplines that app/y);
®iseipline
Percentane of Proiect ~
Hyncmmre 0.00%
Law Enforcement 0.00%
Emergency Medical Services -Non-Fire Based 0.00%
Emergency Medical Services -Fire Based 0.00%
Fire Service „ ~„~,
Hazardous Materials 100.00%
Public Works 0.00%
Public Safety Communications 0.00%
Health Care 0.00%
Emergency Management Agency 0.00%
Public Health 0.00%
Governmental Administrative 0.00%
Cyber Security 0.00%
Not for Profit/Non-Profit 0.00%
Regional Transit System 0.00%
11. Is this oroiect Hart of amulti-'urisdiction proiect~ /Check box if "Yes 2Q
If "Yes, "list the other participating jurisdictions.
]urisdiction
12. Proiect Manaoement
12.A. Milestones
Identify three milestones, with start and end dates, which wi// be achieved within the two-year period of
performance, Depending on the timing ofaward a/locations, the FY2012 period ofperformance is
estimated to occurfrom approximate/ySeptember2011 -September2013.
A,4COG Project Funding Request Form FY2012 - .;: e February 23, 2012
Milestone
Number Milestone Name ~ ®ate
(mm/dd/yyyy) end ®ate
(mm/dd/yyyy)
1 Identify vendor(s) 10/01/2012 10/31/2012
~ Order equipment 11/01/2012 11/30/2012
3 Receive equipment & place in service 12/01/2012 .1/31/2013
13. Risk Assessment ffor ffhis Rroject.
Grading Criteria Very
Unlikely Unlikely Somewhat
Likel Likely Very
Likel
Threat: What is the likelihood of an 1 ~ 3 4 5
act of terrorism?
Idask off an event aimed at the City off Schertz is very unlikely.
Brief description of scoring results. However, two interstate highways and three rail lines
traverse Schertz increasing the risk of an inadvertent event.
Grading Criteria No
Vulnerabili Minimal
Vulnerabili Some
Vulnerabilit Vulnerable Extremely
Vulne ble
Vulnerability: What is the relative 1 2 3 4 5
ex osure to a terrorist act?
Government offices, schools, shopping centers, churches, and
Brief description of scoring results, critical infrastructure are extremely vulnerable.
Grading Criteria No Impact Local Impact Regional
Im ct State Impact National
Im act
Consequence: What is the expelled 1 2 3 4 5
im act of a terrorist act?
A WMD or Hazmat event on IH 35 or one of the rail lines has
Brief description of scoring results. the potential to affect 10,000 or more people and disrupt
major transportation route(s).
AACOG Project Funding Request Form FY2012 - 4 - February 23, 2012
• Ric ciri~o~ .
o s~
yi
~_~~!
Memorandum
Dafe: Apri123, 2012 ~r~
To: John Kessel, City Manager~a(/
From: David Covington, Fire Chief
Subject: AACOG Funding Request
Please see the attached document regarding a request for funding fiom the Alamo Area
Council of Government's Homeland Security Grant Program (HSGP). This is not a grant
application, but rather a request to AACOG to share funds from their grant project. The
funds are requested to replenish hazardous materials supplies which have expired, or az~e
about to expire. I apologize for the taz~diness of getting this to you, but we need to return
this to AACOG electronically by noon, May 2, 2012.
Signature of Authorizing Chief ®fficial
This signature certifies that the requestor understands the requirements, procedures, and deliverables coinciding with this
request for funding and has the authority to represent the governing body of this organization.
~~
Authorizing Chief Official
C,ll ?~I f`."~~
Date '-~ -r
Printed Name
Title
Signature of Projeck Manager
The following person is authorized to receive direction, manage work performed, complete and sign required reports, and
otherwise nact~on behalf of the jurisdiction for this project.
~ ~f~LA7'b 0~~2o~2n7j
Project Manager Date
Applications must be sent electronically to his aacog com and received no
later than NOON May 2 2012
AACOG Project Funding Request Form FY2012 - S' - February 23, 2012
TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
TEXAS HOMELAND SECURITY STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY (THSSAA)
2012 ELIGIBILITY CERTIFICATION FORM
INITIALS CERTIFICATION
I. i~AT;tONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (NIMS
Please initial to certify to one of the NIMS statements below (initial only one box, A or B):
1. My jurisdictionlorganization has adopted and implemented NIMS.
To Certify to
I.A, Initial htfps:l/www.Tema.oov/nimscasULopoff.do?a=550628m=ML2010
Here: 2. Myjursdiction is compliant with all NIMS objectives issued to date (FY2005-FY2009).
A 3. Myjurisdiction completed the annual 2011 NIMSCAST assessment for all of its
divisions/departments including any law enforcement division/department, and has a NIMSCAST
li
f 100%
wmp
ance score o
.
Required Attachment: A copy of the jurisdiction's 2011 NIMSCAST report that summarizes the score
totals for each subsection. (FY 2011 NIMS Implementation Metrics, Summary of Assessment.)
My jurisdiciion/organization has adopted and implemented NIMS, but one of the following situations
applies (check one):
To Certify to
I.B, Initial ~ Myjurisdiction did not achieve a score of 100%for the FY 2011 NIMS Implementation
Here: Objectives and Metrics for Local Governments.
Required Attachments: l) A copy of the jurisdiction's NIMSCAST report that summarizes the
score totals for each subsection (FY 2011 NIMS Implementation Metrics, Summary of
Assessment.); and 2) A letter explaining the steps taken since the assessment to achieve 100%
B NIMS compliance and the date the jurisdiction expects to be in full compliance with all objectives
and check and metrics.
one of the
two boxes at ~ Myjurisdiction did not completelsubmit the 2011 NIMSCAST assessment.
right Required Attachment: A letter explaining 1) why the jurisdiction failed to complete the 2011
NIMSCAST assessment; 2) the steps taken since October 1, 2011 to achieve 100% NIMS
compliance; 3) the date the jurisdiction expects to be in full wmpliance with all objectives and
metrics, and 4) a statement that `The jurisdiction will use the NIMSCAST in 2012, by the
established deadlines, to record NIMS compliance "
l.: EMERGENCY MAN~iGEMENT PLANS {INTERMEDIATE LEVEL)
Myjurisdiction has its own current emergency management plan, which meets the state
®
To Certify to II., preparedness standards ai the Intermediate Level, on file with the Texas Division of Emergency
Initial Here: Management (TDEM).
Myjurisdiction is a legally established member of aninter-jurisdictional emergency management
program which has a plan, which meets the state preparedness standards at the Intermediate
Level, on file with TDEM.
and check one
of the three ~ Myjurisdiction/organization is not a city or county and is not required by Texas law to have an
boxes at right emergency management plan, e.g., COG or nonprofit organization.
1 of 3
III: AIVIB CIRCULAR A-t33 SINGLE AUDTT
My jurisdiction'slorganization's fiscal year (FY) end for 2011 was (check one):
^ August 31, 2011 (Reporting Package is due 30 days after completion or May 31, 2012, whichever is sooner)
September 30, 2011 (Reporting Package is due 30 days after completion or June 30, 2012, whichever is sooner)
^ December 31, 2011 (Reporting Package is due 30 days after completion or September 30, 2012, whichever is sooner)
^ Other (please specify date here):
Please initial to certify to one of A-133 Audit statements below (initial only one box, A, B, or C) and then complete D if required:
To Certify to
III.A,
A Initial Here: I certify my jurisdictioNorganization did not expend over $500,000 in Federal or State funding during FY
2011 so no A-133 audit was necessary or obtained.
To Certify to I certify my jurisdiction/organization expended over $500,000 in Federal or State funding in FY 2011, but
III.B, Initial the FY 2011 A-133 audit is not vet complete or due to DPS. The below certification is therefore based
Here: on our FY 2010 audit/expendilures (check one).
I certify during FY 2010 my jurisdiction/organization did not expend over $500,000 in Federal or
State funding during so no A-133 audit was necessary or obtained for FY 2010; FY 2011 A-
B 133 audit will be timely filed with DPS.
and check ~ There were no findings in the FY 2010 audit.
one of the
four boxes There were some findings, but NO findings concerning THSSAA-administered grants in the
~
at right FY 2010 audit.
The FY 2010 audit contained findings related to THSSAA-administered grants.
To Certify to I certify my jurisdiclionlorganization expended over $500,000 in Federal or State funding in FY 2011, and
III.C, Initial the FY 2011 A-133 audit has been completed. The below certification is based on our FY 2011
Here: audiUexpenditures (check one).
® There were no findings in the FY 2011 audit.
C
and check ~ There were some findings, but NO findings concerning THSSAA-administered grants in the
one of the FY 2011 audit.
three boxes
at right ~ The FY 2011 audit contained findings related to THSSAA•administered grants.
Section D is only required if you certified to B or C above.
To Certify
to III.D,
Initial Here: I certify that the required reporting package has been provided 1) to the Texas Department of Public
D Safety (TXDPS), and 2) to the Federal Clearinghouse; and 3) that a copy of the A-133 Audit has already
been provided to TXDPS.
2of3
IV. TEXAS REGIONAL RESPONSI; NETWORK (TRKN)
To Certify to IV.,
Initial Here: Myjudsdicfionlorganization is regisleredwith the Texas Re tonal Res onse Network TRRN and check
9 P ( )
one): https:l/www.trrn.state tx usITRRNIindexla asox
® My jurisdiction has entered all deployable equipment with a cost of $5
000 or more
,
purchased with Homeland Security Grant funds into the TRRN.
and check one ^ My jurisdiction does not have any deployable equipment with a cost of $5,000 or more
of the two boxes purchased wish Homeland Security Grant funds.
at ri ht
p. DUNS, CCR and FFATA
To Certify to V., I certify my jurisdiction/organization has entered all required CCR and FFATAIemployee compensation
Initial Here: information. The CCR registration has been reviewed/updated and is valid though the end of 2012.
"'" Required Attachment: For the DUNS number provided below, sprint-friendly copy of an active CCR
registration valid (at least) throu
h the end of calend
2012
D
!j~~
g
ar year
(
ecember 31, 2012).
T
VI. CRIMINAL HLSTORY DISPOSITION REPORTING (If Applicable)
This certification section applies to County iuristlictions only for State Homeland Security Grant Proaram ISHSPI. For FY
2012, this section DOES NOT APPLY to cities within counties or io NSGP, OPSG, or UASI applicants. Please initial one of the
below to certify to the statement which describes your criminal history disposition reporting compliance:
To Certify to
VI.A, Initial
A Here: My County has documented a 90% disposition completeness rate for adult arrests under calendar
years 2000.2010 as required by Chapter 60, Texas Code of Criminal Procedure.
To Certify to
VI.B, Initial
My County DOES NOT have a documented 90% disposition completeness rate for adult arrests under
Here: calendar years 2006-2010, but my County: a) has established a Local Data Advisory Board; b) has filed a
B Data Reporting Improvement Plan with TXDPS; and c) intends to attain a completeness percentage of at
least 90% by January 1, 2013.
~• AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE(S)..
Print Name of Jurisdictionl0rganization
City of Schertz
Print Name of Chief Elected Official,
Chief Executive Officer, OR Chief
Financial Officer John C. Kessel
Title (Judge, Mayor, ED,
City Manager, CFO) City Manager
Signature
Date ~ ~ I ~ DUNS Number
010534675
3 of 3
Metrics Summary Assessment
USA » State(ferritory » Region 6 » Texas » Alamo Area
Council of Governments » Schertz, City of
June 11.2012
Data Snapshot: (Current Assessment Data Set)
~~~®11 RIBIV9~ D~pl~~u~~~~~o~~ ~by~~tri~~~ ~~c~ fV~~$rs~~ ~®~
~®~~9 ~®v~r~~~~u~$~
S~a~rr~ao°~
Last Update Date:
Lac4 Rnllun Ila4a•
2012-04-09
~n~~_nn_na
r
V
Secflons Complete FY2011
FY2011~-
NIMS Ado tion Im lementatlon Ob'ectlves 4 / 4 100% 4 / 4 100%
Preparedness: Planning Implementation 2 / 2 (100%) 2 / 2 (100%)
Ob ectives
Preparedness: Training Implementation
' 11 / 11 (100%) 7 / 7 (100%) 4 / 4 (100%)
Ob
ectlves
Preparedness: Exercises Implementation
' 3 / 3 (100%) 3 / 3 (100%)
Ob
ectives
Communications and Information Management 2 / 2 (100%) 2 / 2 (100%)
Im lementatlon Ob ectives
Resource Management Implementation 4 / 4 (100%) 4 / 4 (100%)
Ob ectives
Command and Management Implementation
' 4 / 4 (100%) 4 / 4 (100%)
Ob
ectlves
Overall 30/30 100% 26126 100% 4/4 100%
Page 1 of 3
Metrics Summary Assessment
USA » State/Territory » Region 6 » Texas » Alamo Area
Council of Governments » Schertz, City of
June 11, 2012
Data Snapshot: (Current Assessment Data Set)
FY2011 RAMS Implementati®n ®bj~ctiv~~ and M~tri~~ f®r
L®cal G®vernments
®etails
NIMS Adoption Implementation Objectives.
1. Adoption
_! /
~ / ,. _,
.- .. ...
3. Point of Contact -
; r~ -
4. Implementation Strategy i
/
i
5. Ensure Federal Preparedness Funding
support NIMS
~ /
.Preparedness: Planning Implementation Objectives ~
! /
7. Revise and update plans
_
! / ---
_
8. Promote and develop intrastate and interstate
_ mutual aid agreements i /
Preparedness: Training Implementation Objectives / /
.
9. Utilize existing resources to coordinate and
deliver NIMS training / ~
10. IS-700 NIMS: An Introduction training I / -
11. IS-701 NIMS Multiagency Coordination
S stems trainin
j
/
12. IS-702 NIMS Public Information training /
13. IS-703 NIMS Resource Management training_ I /
14. IS-704 NIMS Communication and Information
Management training __
/
15. IS-800 NRF: An Introduction training I /
16. ICS-100 Introduction to ICS trainin I /
17. ICS-200 ICS for Single Resources and Initial
Action Incidents training /
18. ICS-300 Intermediate ICS training I /
__19. ICS-400 Advanced ICS training i
~ /
_
-- -
Preparedness: Exercises Implementation Objectives ~
~ / --
Page 2 of 3
Metrics Summary Assessment
USA » Statefferritory » Region 6 » Texas » Alamo Area
Council of Governments » Schertz, Cily of
June 11,2012
Data Snapshot: (Current Assessment Data Set)
20. Incorporate NIMS concepts and principles
into all trainin and exercises /
21. Plan and/or Participate in all-hazards
/
exercise ro ram
22. Incorporate corrective actions into
preparedness and response plans and /
rocedures
Communications and Information Management
/ !
I
tim lementatlon Objectives
23. Apply Common and Consistent Terminolo /
__
24. Utilize Systems, Tools and Process to /
resent consistent and accurate information
Resource Mana ement Im lementation Ob ectives /
25. Inventory response assets to conform to /
NIMS National Resource T in Definitions
26. Utilize response asset Inventory /
27. Ensure Intero erabillt /
28. Initiate development of credentialing~stem _____ __ _
Command and Management Implementation /
~
Objectives
29. Manage incidents/planned events is
/
accordance with ICS
30. Multi-agency Coordination System /
31. Public Information /
32. Public Information: Ensure information Is
gathered, verified, coordinated and /
disseminated
/ Strength
~
Weakness
K Not Completed
xn Not Applicable
Page 3 of 3
.aurasutcnun rrepareuness rruaue
Jurisdiction: Schertz Report Date: 3/2/2012 12:38 PM Plan Record: Primary
County: GUADALUPE COC: 18-Alamo Area Council of Govemmenls DC Region: 6C
Assaclations:
EMC: Beverly Todd DC: Summer Ray
Assessment of Planning Preparedness: Intermediate Funding Status: NOTEMPG
Legal documents establishing the lOCal Emergency Management Program:
City Ordinance Date: 17119!2000 Court Order Date:
NIMS Adoption Date: 9/20/2005 DEM 147 Dale: 9/13/201 I
Joint Resolution Date:
Review Ex ire
Document Plan Date Date Date Nims Status Deficiencies Action Required
Requirements for BASIC LEVEL of Preparedness, these Annexes:
Bazic Plan 08/282007 01/112001 08/28/2012 Yes Approved Revise by Sih anniversary of Plan dale
Annex A 02/10/2009 09!0412009 02/102014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan dale
AnnexB 09/052007 01/11/2007 09!0512012 Yes Approved Revise by Srh anniversary of Plan date
Annex C 03/12/2009 04/152009 03/12/2014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan date
AnnexE 03/102009 122772009 03/10/2014 Yes Approved Revise by 6rh anniversary of Plan date
Annex I 11/13/2007 08/012009 11/13/2012 Yes Approved Revise by SIh anniversary of Plan dale
Annex M 111302007 10/042006 11/30/2012 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan dale
Annex N 06/26/2008 07/102008 06/26/2013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh onniversary of Plan dale
Annex 0 03/272009 04/17/2009 03/27/2014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversaryof Plan dale
AnnexQ 11/132009 12/222009 11/132014 Yes Approved Revise by srh anniversaryof Plan dale
Annex V 0326/2008 05/232008 03/262013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan dale
_.equiremenis for INTERMEDIATE LE VEL of Preparedness (Basic + these Annexes):
AnnexD 06/162008 OS/OS/2008 06/162013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan date
AnnexF 06!182008 05/082006 06/182013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan date
Annex G 06242008 09/302008 06242013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversap• of Plan dale
AnnexB 111162009 12/27/2009 11/16!2014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversap•ofPlan dale
Annex 3 07/312008 10/232006 07/31/2013 Yes Approved Revise by 6dr anniversaryof Plop dale
Annex K 08/07/2008 10/272008 05/0712013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan date
Annex L 11/162009 12222009 11/16/2014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan dale
Annex R 061212008 0510&2008 06212013 Yes Approved Revise by 81h anniversary of Plan dale
Annex S 17!182008 12/70/2008 12/182013 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Pian dale
Requirements far ADVANCED. LEVEL of Pre~aared ness (Basic + In termediate + these Annexes):
Annex P 11202009 12/2772009 11202014 Yes Approved Revise by Srh anniversaryof Plan date
Annex T No Never Submined prepare Annex
AnnexU 11118/2009 1227/2009 Ill/&2014 Yes Approved Revise by Slh anniversary of Plan date
CITY OF SCHERTZ
SCHEDULE OF FINDINGS AND QUESTIONED COSTS -FEDERAL AWARDS
FOR THE YEAR ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 201 I
Summary of Auditor's Results
A. Summary of Auditor's Results
1. The auditor's report expresses an unqualified opinion on the financial statements of the City of
Schertz.
2. There were no deficiencies, significant deficiencies or material weaknesses disclosed during the
audit of the City of Scheitz.
3. No instances of noncompliance material to the financial statements of the City of Schutz were
disclosed during the audit.
4. The auditor's report on compliance with requirements that could have a direct and material effect on
each major program and on internal control over compliance in accordance with OMB Circular
A-133 for the City of Scheitz expresses an unqualified opinion on all major federal programs.
5. Major programs tested are as follows:
A) United States Department of Energy
Pass thru Comptroller of Public Accounts
1. ARRA -Energy Efficiency and Conservation Block GranUCFDA No. 81.128
2. ARRA Distribution Renewable Energy GrandCFDA No. 81.041
6. The threshold used to distinguish behveen Type A and Type B federal programs was $300,000.
7. The City of Scheitz was classified as a high-risk auditee in the context of OMB Circular A-133.
B. Findings Relatine to the Financial Statement Which are Required to be Reported in Accordance with
Generally Accented Auditine Standards
None.
C. Federal Atvard Findings and Questioned Costs for Federal Awards
None.
119
- ~PROVIDEq -
i;l TII 1"PwtIJ'i 9c0ertz Flre Resale i ffl l,rr•~GUadalupe
r t]-~'LI P-'I Glen Outlaw - ~ 29.668!80
/ I'.1'A~I II (210)619i20D Y~Ip~-90.2]4199
IF r" 1 VIII > r 1400 Stlter[e ParMVag Bldg B : 1; l (210) 619-1399
- nl f~f ~IVH1•..19005chxrtz Parkway -131(L%ge8i231
+i 9chertz Ill! (210)619-1300
11~1/'~ TK a 1 :~ Rre@srberte.wm
_ ;y.~]8159 1~SA{o'. 2/2/20061122 PM
4F'i '•g;/.VGf ]0/30/20088:35 AM
EQUIPMENT
2D .-
COUNTY RESOURCE FEMA DESCRIPTION USAGE TOTAL CURRENT PERSONNEL LAT LONG CONTACT 24-HR FA% CELL
CnTF
T MRV/
TYPE
LIMITATIONS
NUMBER AVAIL
ASSIGNED
NAME
PHONE EMAIL RESPONSE
T pREA
.~GUadalupe [ommunlm0ons/ Other ACU-100D vi1F/UHF/BOD 1 1 0 29
56818D - Gle 2
0
InferOpera611iry . n (
1
7 (2ID) (210) fire@zcberta.com Regional
Equipment 98.2]4199 Outlaw 619- 619- 988-
120D 1399 9211
.l`GUadaWpe fammunlwlion5/ Other MSAT G2 VHF Portable 2 2 0 29568180
- Gl
2
Satellite Radio Satellite en (
10) (210) (210) fire@scher[z.mm Regional
Cpmmuntratpr 98.D4199 Ou Oaw 619- 619- 488-
1200 1399 4231
l1r Guadalupe Tlre/Nazl4a[ ONer Survivalr Panther 4500 psi l-hour 2 2 0 29
5681130 - Gl
ReSOmces/SCOA
CBRN . en 210
( )
(210)
(210)
fire@SUer[zcom Regional
98.D4199 Outlaw 619- 619- a88-
1200 1]99 4231
'•C Guadalupe Sear¢h & RezWe ONer Thermal lmaging Hantlheld 1 1 0 2ASCd18D - Glen (210) (210) (210) fi
h
Resources/
Ins[rumentatlon
Camera
98.224199 Outlaw
619-
619-
q80- re@se
ertz.mm Regional
1200 1399 9231
.!} Guadalupe IIanSportatl0n /
5
m1-Iraile Other HA2MAT
R 1 1 0 24568!80 - Glen (210) (210) (210) fire@sQ1erK
c9m Regonal
e
n
q
Uazed esponse Trailer
(B#D) 98.2]4199 Outlaw 639- 619- 988- .
120D 1399 9231
usEHs
USER ID CONTACT PHYSICAL MAILING CITY STATE 2IP 20-HR FA% CELL EMAIL TITLE
NAME
pDDRES$
ADDpE55
PHONE TYPE CREATED
.~dcpvingfon David COVington 1400 SChertz Parkway,
ld 19005chertz 5[bertz T% ]8154 (210)619- (210)619- (210)488- tlwvingOOnDSUertnwm Flre Basic Changer ]/12/20101L49
B
g B Parkway 1200 1399 g230 Chief qM
;~ goullaw Glen Outlaw 1400 Schertz Parkway,
ld 1900 5 ller[z Stllertz T% ]8154 (210)619- (2107619- (210)488- fire@cLSCberez.K.us Basic T2 2/2/2006 12:22
B
g a Parkway 1200 1399 g231 CM1anger PM
OK-