Loading...
12-13-2016 Agenda with backupMEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL December 13, 2016 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 Call to Order — Regular Session Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flans of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Davis) City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof: Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Dearing of `Residents portion of'the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. 12 -13 -2016 Council Agenda Workshop • Discussion of the Moratorium in Southern Schertz - Discussion and update regarding the moratorium in Southern Schertz. (B. James) Discussion and Action Items 1. Minutes — Consideration and/or action regarding the approval of the minutes of the Special Retreat Meeting of December 2, 2016 and the Regular meeting of December 6, 2016. (J. Kessel /B. Dennis) 2. Resolution No. 16 -R -89 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an Agreement with Cibolo Creek Municipal. Authority for the installation of a ]eased pre - packaged sewer treatment plant to expand waste water treatment capacity at the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant. (D. Wait /J. Hooks) 3. Ordinance No. 16 -T-40 — Consideration and /or action approving Ordinance No. 16- T -40 authorizing a budget adjustment to fund the demolition and replacement of the bridge at Lower Seguin Road and Cibolo Creek. First Reading (D. Wait/D. Letbetter) 4. Resolution No. 16 -R -90— Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing EMS Debt Revenue Adjustments, Utility Billing Debt Revenue Adjustments and Schertz Magazine Debt Revenue Adjustments for certain inactive outstanding accounts receivables. (J. Walters /J. Mabbitt/R. Rosales /L. Klepper) 5. Resolution No. 16 -R -92— Conduct a Public Hearing and consideration and/or action approving Resolution accepting a petition by Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority for PH voluntary annexation of approximately 63 acres of land, located at 7424 Trainer Hale Road, Bexar County, Texas. (B. James /L. Wood /B. Cox) 6. Ordinance No. 16 -S -39 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and /or action PH approving an Ordinance on a request for a specific use permit and associated site plan to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps on an approximate 1 acre site located at 17601 Four Oaks Lane. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood/C. Gould) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Requests and Announcements 7. Announcements by City Manager • Citizen Kudos • Recognition of City employee actions • New Departmental initiatives 12 -13 -2016 City Council Agenda Page - 2 - 8. Future Agenda Item Request for City Council: This is an opportunity for City Council members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. No discussion of the merits of the item may be taken at this time. Should a Council Member oppose placement of the requested item on a future agenda, the Mayor, without allowing discussion, shall ask for the consensus of the other City Council members to place or not place the item on a future agenda. 9. Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers 10. Councilmember Orientation- Information and discussion regarding Employee Engagement Overview, Class & Comp Study /Compensation Philosophy, Budget Model Overview (Three Circles, Five Year Forecast, Thirty Year Bond Capacity, Reserve Fund, Annual Audit). Adjournment CERTIFICATION I, DONNA SCHMOEKEL, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 9th DAY OF DECEMBER 2016 AT 2:45 P.M., WHICH IS A :PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. T�'ovuv'i2 sahv�to6zeL onna Schmoekel, Deputy City Secretar I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON DAY OF 2016. Title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If ' you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 210 -619 -1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. 12 -13 -2016 City Council Agenda Page - 3 - Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Carpenter Councilmember Davis— Place 1 Audit Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Investment Advisory Committee TIRZ II Board Councilmember Gutierrez — Place 2 Councilmember Larson — Place 3 Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards — Place 4 Councilmember Thompson — Place 5 Audit Committee Audit Committee Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation Councilmember Kiser — Place 6 Councilmember Crawford — Place 7 12 -13 -2016 City Council Agenda Page - 4 - CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 13, 2016 Department: Subject: BACKGROUND City Secretary Minutes Agenda No. 1 The City Council held a Special Retreat meeting on December 2, 2016 and a Regular meeting on December 6, 2016. FISCAL IMPACT RM Staff recommends Council approve the minutes of the Special. Retreat Meeting of December 2 and the minutes of the Regular meeting of December 6. ATTACHMENTS Special Meeting of December 2, 2016 Regular Meeting of December 6, 2016 MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING December 2, 2016 A Special Teambuilding Session Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on December 2, 2016, at 8:30 a.m. at the LaQuinta Inn and Suites, 1.7650 Four Oaks Lane, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James Executive Director .Kyle .Kinateder City Attorney Charles Zech Edwards Gutierrez Thompson 'rawford Staff Members who joined afternoon session: IT Director Myles Clauser, Interim Finance Director James `Waite Van Zandt, GIS Coordinator Tony McFalls,, Fire Chief David Coo' ') Police Chief Michael Hansen, Assistant Police Chief Mark Bane, Public Works Director Jimmy Hooks, City Engineer Kathy W Klepper, Library Director Melissa Uhlhorn, Hunan ResoAirce/Purct with Davis Solutions , Parks & Recreation Director Chuck ;ton, Assistant Fire Chief Kade Long, 1S Director Jason Mabbitt, Assistant idtee Public Affairs Director Linda dnii and Asset Director Jessica Kurz action on strategic planning issues, employee and City Council �ernance. Q. Kessel) led by Davis Success Solutions (Facilitators & Vision/Alignment /Execution In the morning session Roy and Mary Anne Davis made an introduction to Council of the process and program of the teambuilding exercise today to cover what leadership means, the work of leaders: - DISC Model and understanding the model — premise of DISC - DISC Profiles - Work of Leaders Models - Behaviors and how you apply them - Leadership Model — Vision, Alignment, Execution - Vision — three drivers (Exploration, Boldness, Testing Assumptions) 12 -2 -2016 Minutes Page - i - Mayor Carpenter recessed the morning session for lunch break at 11:22 a.m., Mr. Brockman left the meeting. Mayor Carpenter reconvened the meeting at 11:45 a.m. Mr. Brockman returned back to the meeting. The following topics were covered in the afternoon: - Managers vs. Leaders in Execution - Strategy Plans - Building Alignment - Championing Execution — Key components - Team Leadership Strengths - Team Leadership Challenges Mayor Carpenter recessed the meeting at 1:55 p.m., to rearrange'the room and allow staff members to join the Council. Mayor Carpenter reconvened the meeting ut 2:00 p.m. and'tnembers of staff who arrived introduced themselves. Facilitators Roy and Mary Ann provided - DISC Profiles the whole team, Council and Management Team as a whole - Comparison Reports - Team will be getting healthier by: (1)"build a cohesive leadership team, create clarity, open communication and clarity, re- inforce clarity its a whole. City Manager John Kessel provided closing remaz Mayor Carpenter adjournd'the meeting at 3:03 p. ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City S p.m. 12-2-2016 Minutes Page - 2 - and Councilmembers. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor MINUTES REGULAR MEETING December 6, 2016 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on December 6, 2016, . at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1.400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Mayor Pro -Tem Cedric Edwards Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Rubin Th6mpso Councilmember Angelina Kiser Councilmember Bert, Crawford Staff Present: City Manager John Kess l Executive Director Brian James Executive director Dudley Wait Assistant to the City Manager Sarah Gonzalez City Attorney Charles Zech� ,: City Secretary Brenda Dennis Deputy City Secretary Donna Sc Call to Order — City Council Regular Session Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to order at 6:03 p.m. Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance (Mr. Ken :Ratcliff, Schertz Church of Christ) Mr. Ratcliff provided the United States and the Stab • Presentation reg< Williams /D. Wei (Becky) Williams why said tb 2016 Student Art and Essay C members, teachers, school and all the students who narticibatc CISD of the United. States and State of Texas. the pledges of allegiance to the flags of the y and Art Contest winners. (B. Dennis /R. ISD K -12 Social Studies Curriculum Coordinator Rebecca ere here tonight to present the awards for the 3rd Annual A. She thanked Mayor /Council, students, parents, family ict administrators and community members for supporting The theme off i,s year's contest was `Animals of Texas'. Participating students were asked to create a piece o1 artwork depicting the animal of their choice and also write an essay about the animal, the region of Texas it lives in and its' significance in the state of Texas. This year there were 170 'entries. On November 2, 2016, sixteen judges made up of Schertz Historical Society Members and SCUCISD staff members, came together to judge the artwork. Ms. Williams called each individual student forward who was subsequently presented with a certificate and trophy for places 1 through 3. A group picture was taken afterward. Mayor Carpenter expressed congratulations to all the winners /participants on behalf of Council, City Staff, and community residents. 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page - 1 - Mayor Carpenter recessed the meeting at 6:30 p.m. to allow audience members to exit and reconvened back into regular session at 6:35 p.m. New Employee Recognitions: Mayor Carpenter recognized Library Director ME Mr. Tayloe and provided a short bio on each staff Presentation • Special Presentation from Mr. Harmon) e (B. James /L. Lesa Wood Page Ms. Mertz and recognition. (Kevin Dispatcher rivi supervisor mar mct -ovum EMS Paramedic Todd Kaiser EMS Paramedic Fred Kurzban Fire Lt. Carl Berghofer Fire Apparatus Operator Thomas Holliek Fire Fighter Justin Schwersinske Fire Fighter Zachary Jewett Mayor Carpenter thanked Mr. Harmon for sharing his story with everyone and thanking our city rescue team members. As a city, this is our primary reason for existing - for providing protection and services to our residents. 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page - 2 - • Presentation from the Schertz Parks & Recreation Foundation regarding awarding grants to BVYA, YMCA, and the City of Schertz as well as a design idea for a mural at Pickrell Park Pool and an update on the status of the Foundation. (J. Jacobs /L. Smith) Mayor Carpenter recognized Schertz Parks & Recreation Foundation member Lacy Smith who introduced the other members, Eddie McNew, Tim `Jake' Jacobs, Johnny Bierschwale, .Kevin Mayfield, Yolanda Suarez, and Amy Quisenberry. Their mission is to host several city events, mainly the April Jazz N Blues in the Park, the July Schertz Jubilee, and September Schertz BBQ Cookoff. The proceel from these events are supposed to go back to the parks for improvements in the city., At their last meeting they voted unanimously to disband as:a foundation. Therefore, all of the funds will be distributed for park programs within the city.' They presented the following grants: All the board member's are thankful for their opportunity to have served on this foundation. • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B: James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) Director Brian James who provided the following ts: + Thursday, December 8, City Staff Holiday Luncheon, Civic Center, 11:00 a.m. • Thrsday, December 8, NEP Luncheon, 11:30 a.m., Olympia Hills Con£ Center. • Saturday, December 1.0, `Elf in the Park', at Pickrell Park, Feature Movie is `ELF', whichistarts af'6:00 p.m. Refreshments available for purchase. • Tuesday,, December 13, Council Meeting, 6:00 p.m. • Thursday, December 15, First Responders Free Thank You Breakfast, sponsored by Legacy at Forest Ridge, 5001 Schertz Pkwy, 8 -9 a.m. • Monday, December 26, City Offices Closed for Christmas. • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) No announcements were provided. 12 -6 -2016 Minutes Page - 3 - Workshop • Council Committee and Liaison Assignments - Discussion and update regarding various Council liaison positions. (B. Dennis /D. Schmoekel) Mayor Carpenter recognized Deputy City Secretary Donna Schmoekel who stated each year at this time Council reviews their assignments for representation on various city - affiliated boards and committees. The following boards have vacancies: • Animal Control Advisory Committee • Sweetheart Advisory Group • Schertz Housing Authority Board • Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) • Interview Committee for Appointments tii City Boards and The following boards currently have 1 * vacancies at this After a brief dialpgue among, council, the following councilmembers offered to serve as Ralp#t Gutierrez — Animal Control Advisory Committee Angelina Kiser — Sweetheart Advisory Group Mark Davis:- Schertz Housing Authority Board Bert Crawford- Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Bert Crawford' Mark Davis — Interview Committee for Appointments to City Boards and Commissions Councilmembers can call or e -mail the city secretary's office for any further questions or to state what other boards they would consider serving on. Hearing of Residents Mayor Carpenter recognized the following individuals who spoke: 12 -6 -2016 Minutes Page - 4 - • Mrs. Clare Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows Drive, who congratulated all the newly elected council officials and wishing them the best as they start their new terms. She noted this is a very diverse group with individual expertise in different areas. This should serve the citizens of the community well. Good luck and congratulations to everyone. • Ms. Maggie Titterington, The Chamber President, who provided the following information: The Chamber was able to award $20,000 to the school district today for their DECA programs. One check was written out for Steele High School and the other check was for Clemens High School. Their first `Biz Ed' event of the new year will be highlighted b the appearance of former Green Bay Packer linebacker, Mike Weddington, who is now a business consultant. His topic will be `Is your business NFL worthyT It will be a' four hour session. Contact The Chamber for more information. On January 28, 2017 they will once again bepartnering With the City of Schertz and hosting their annual Health and Wholeness Fair, at the ehertz Civic Center. There will be 70 booths including vendors offering health inform, aon on nutrition, fitness, spiritual, and mental topics. It will be held from l l a.m. -3 p.m. ,with free admission. Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request ofthe Mayor or 41Councilmember. 1. Minutes — Consideration and /or action regarding the approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 2, 2016 and the minutes of the Special Meeting of November 21, 2016. (T,;Kgssel/B. Dennis) 2. Scheduling a Regular Council: ,meeting for December 20, 2016 and the Cancellation of the December 27, 20,16, and January 3, 2017 City Council Meetings — Consideration and/or action "`,scheduling a Regular Council meeting for December 20, 2016 and cancelling the December, 27, 2016 arid' January 3, 2017 City Council meetings due to the holidays. (B. Dennis /Council) Mayor Carpenter ' recognized Councilmember Crawford who moved, seconded by Councilmember Thompson to approve consent agenda items 1 and 2 as presented. The vote was 6 -0 -1 with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards abstaining and Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for. Motion passed. Discussion and Action Items 3. Application for Landmark or Heritage Neighborhood Property Designation — Consideration and /or action approving a Landmark Property Designation for 603 Main Street. (B. James /D. Weirtz) 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page - 5 - Mayor Carpenter recognized Schertz Historical Preservation Committee Chair Dean Weirtz who said Section 21.4.9 Designation of Landmark Properties and Heritage Neighborhoods of the City of Schertz' Unified Development Code (UDC) establishes the requirements and process for designating a property as a Schertz Landmark Property. The property being proposed for designation is 603 Main Street. This property was nominated by the Schertz Historical Preservation Committee (SHPC) and was recommended for designation by the SHPC on October 27, 2017. The Landmark Property designation does trigger any additional City development regulations or restrictions. Staff recommends the Designation of 603 Maim Street as a Landmark Property. Both Chair Weirtz and Executive Director Brian James addressed several questions from Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who',, "inoved, seconded by Councilmember Larson to approve the application fat landmark or heritage neighborhood property designation for 603 Main Street. The ©te was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson; Thompson, Kiser. and. Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 4. Resolution No. 16 -R -86 — Consideration and/or ac Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the Alamc ( AACOG) to provide funding for Transit; Services in the The following was read into record: SOLUTION: NO. 1 approving authorizing a Third Council of Governments 'of Schertz. (B. James) A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING A THIRD AMENDMENT Tt THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS , ( AACOG) TO PROVIDE FUNDING OF $28,8'72.00 FOR TRANSIT SERVICES IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ. Mayor Carpentet recognized Executive Director Brian James who stated Schertz residents benefit from access fo ART (Alamo Regional Transit), the demand - response transit service operated by the Alamo: Area Council of Governments ( AACOG). ART makes it possible for the residents that use this service to be independent and improves their quality of life. As a result bf the 2010 Census, Schertz was included in the San Antonio urbanized area. Prior to this designation, ART provided this service to Schertz residents using state and federal funds provided directly to AACOG from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). There was no local match required for this service that ART had been providing to 12 rural counties. With Schertz' inclusion in the San Antonio urbanized area federal funds for transportation services are provided to VIA which are in turn provided by VIA to AACOG to provide this service. In urbanized areas a 50% local match is required. ART provides services for Schertz, Cibolo, New Braunfels, Marion and other areas of Guadalupe County. The amount of matching funds required from Schertz is determined based on the budget to provide the service to all these areas and the percent of trips in Schertz. As such, the match amount 12 -6 -2016 Minutes Page - 6 - 5 provided by Schertz varies from year to year; a summary of the costs to provide service with ridership figures and the required local match over the past few years and for 2017. . Schertz and AACOG entered into an inter -local agreement for AACOG to provide the ART service in 2013. The agreement is amended annually to establish Schertz's financial contribution for the upcoming year. A match of $28,872.00 is required this year, which is slightly down from this past year. It should be noted that the reduced cost is the result of few trips anticipated for Schertz residents which make up a smaller percentage of overall trips provided. The average cost per trip has gone up by over 24 %. The City has allocated funds as part of the current budget. Staff is recommending that the City enter into an provide transportation services. While VIA Metropolitan Transit does not provide, the surrounding smaller cities, the federal funding VIA. Additionally VIA does support vanpool`ervi planning for future growth and the role transit sery Schertz, staff regularly meets with VIA staff. Transit Service Study which is a component of VIA AACOG to continue to is $28,872 approval. Mr. • Edwards who moved, seconded by • No. 16 -R -86. The vote was unanimous ers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, ig no. Motion passed. Resolution No. 16-1147— Cdsideration and/ot`action approving a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to sign ,Inter- lrscal A 6ement for Fire Protection Services in Guadalupe County between ,the City of Cibolo, City of Schertz and the City of Seguin. (D. Wait/D. RESOLUTION NO. 16 -R -87 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES IN GUADALUPE COUNTY BETWEEN THE CITY OF CIBOLO, CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND THE CITY OF SEGUIN, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized Fire Chief David Covington who said the Schertz Fire Department is charged with the responsibility of regional fire suppression, protection and prevention. The Fire Department responds to fire and emergency calls in portions of unincorporated Guadalupe County, and responds in support of other county departments when 1.2 -6 -2016 Minutes Page - 7 - needed. This is an annual agreement between Seguin, Cibolo, and the City of Schertz and has no changes from previous years. The benefit to the community is that by providing Fire Protection Services to these areas outside the City, it typically does not adversely impact our responses within the City. We would respond in that area for structure fires with or without the agreement due to our area - wide mutual aid agreement. By maintaining this agreement for Guadalupe County we are able to receive some financial assistance along with providing services in an area that would otherwise be without fire service. The City will receive revenue from the City of Seguin in the amount of $30,108 per year under this agreement. Staff recotonends approval. Chief Covington remained available to answer questions and address comment's from Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Councilmember Crawford to approve Resolution 1. Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Dav and Crawford voting for and no one voting no M Roll Call Vote Confirmation Mayor Carpenter recognized Deputy City Secretary votes for agenda items 1 -5. Mayor Carpenter recessed the meeting at 8 :08 pm so that room for the Councilmember Orientation section. Mayor Carpenter 9. Councilmemb but not limited Randolph JLUS "TIV�� I p.m., in t is' who moved, seconded by 7. The Vote was unanimous with tierrez, Lars A, Thompson, Kiser passed. who provided the roll call d move to the conference discussion regarding information including Philosophy, Thoroughfare Plan Overview, Project Overview and other Governmental S) briefings regarding the following topics: Philosophy — information provided by City Engineer 'Kathy Woodlee: • Thoroughfare Plan Overview — information provided by City Engineer Kathy Woodlee. • Randolph,TLUS Overview — information provided by City Engineer Kathy Woodlee. • South Schertz Sewer Project Overview — information provided by City Engineer Kathy Woodlee. • Other Governmental Bodies, Internal (Boards /Commissions /Committees) — information provided by City Manager John. Kessel. Mayor and Councilmembers returned to the dais at 10: 25 p.m. Mayor Carpenter moved to agenda item 6. 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page - 8 - Requests and Announcements 6. Announcements by City Manager • Citizen Kudos • Recognition of City employee actions • New Departmental initiatives No further announcements were provided. 7. Future Agenda Item Request for City Council: This is ' fi opportunity for City Council members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. No discussion of the merits of the item may be taken at this time. Should a Council Member appose placement of the requested item on a future agenda, the Mayor, with"but allowing discussion, shall ask for the consensus of the other City Council members tai place or not place the'Jtem on a future agenda. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Crawford vho stated he would like to see an item regarding AACOG and who else is participating in an experimental way with transportation — perhaps in January oT early February. Mayor Carpenter stated he was thinking the same thing. Maybe staff could provide a presentation and tell us what they learned as well. as make room in our strategic planning session in January. Councilmember Crawford asked how many miles of 1ppact fee roadway things have we traded off? Can we lbok4t that in the next few months? Mayer, Carpenter recognized Councilmember Crawford who asked about the feasibility of addressing putting a time limit on council discussions or debates to avoid future lengthy meetings (i.e. continuing and /or delaying an item for discussion until the next meeting). Mayor Carpenter stated that procedurally council can at any time suggest we limit debate /discussion or that we move to adjourn. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilman Larson who made a motion to adjourn the meeting. Mayor Carpenter asked if there were any objections to adjourn before addressing Item 8. Since there were no objections, Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards seconded the motion. Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting. Adiournment Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at 1.0:33 p.m. 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page - 9 - Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor r:V09IN Brenda Dennis, City Secretary 1.2 -6 -201.6 Minutes Page -10 - Agenda No. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 1.3, 2016 . Department: Public Works — Waste Water Subject: Resolution 16 -R -89 - Consideration and approval by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement with Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority for the site preparation and installation of a leased pre - packaged sewer treatment plant to expand waste water treatment capacity at the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant On October 25, 2016 . City Council authorized the City Manager to enter into a lease agreement for a pre- packaged waste water treatment plant to double the capacity of the temporary Woman Hollering Creek Treatment Plant. This temporary plant was installed in 2006 to service the area now known as Crossvine until a permanent waste water treatment plant could be constructed on Trainer Hale Road. Due to the pace of development in Crossvine, it has become necessary to expand this treatment capacity and Council approved leasing a 2"d pre - packaged waste water treatment plant to take capacity from 46,000 gallons a day to 92,000 gallons a day. The company supplying the leased pre - package plant will be ready to deliver this equipment very soon. Our waste water partner, Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) is prepared to conduct the necessary site work and infrastructure installation needed for the plants arrival. COMA is the current operator of the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant and will continue operations after the plant expansion is complete. The attached Inter -local Agreement (ILA) will authorize CCMA to do the necessary improvements for the installation of the leased plant and the total costs incurred will be reimbursed to CCMA by the City. Goal To provide safe, efficient and compliant waste water treatment for the Crossvine Development through the use and expansion of a temporary pre - packaged waste water treatment plant. Summary of Recommended Action. Staff recommends approval of the attached Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into this Interlocal Agreement with the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority for the site work and improvements necessary for the successful installation of the leased pre - packaged waste water treatment plant serving the Crossvine development. FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this work by CCMA will be approximately $40,000. Although this cost was not budgeted, the Sewer enterprise fund has a contingency fund of $180,000 and the cost for this necessary work will come from this fund. The Sewer enterprise fund is completely funded by users of the City's wastewater system. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 16 -R -89 Interlocal Agreement between the City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority RESOLUTION NO. 16 -R -89 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY FOR THE INSTALLATION OF A LEASED PRE- PACKAGED SEWER TREATMENT PLANT TO EXPAND WASTE WATER TREATMENT CAPACITY AT THE WOMAN HOLLERING TREATMENT PLANT, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH NOW THEREFORE, WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has an executed agreement with the developers of the CrossVine development to provide waste water treatment capacity; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz and it's waste water treatment partner, Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority have determined that the current treatment plant is approaching its maximum treatment capacity; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has entered into a lease agreement with A.U.C. Group LP for a pre - packaged sewer treatment plant that will double the capacity of the current plant; and WHEREAS, engineering, site work and infrastructure installation is necessary to prepare for the installation of the leased pre - packaged sewer treatment plant; and WHEREAS, Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority, the operator of the current Woman Hollering Treatment Plant is willing and prepared to conduct all necessary preparatory work for this installation in exchange for the City of Schertz reimbursing all costs incurred from this work; THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to enter into the interlocal agreement attached in Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of December, 2016. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Michael R. Carpenter ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) imall LEASE AGREEMENT WITH AUC GROUP LP 50448599.1 A -1 INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR EXPANSION OF WOMAN HOLLERING TREATMENT PLANT BETWEEN CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY AND CITY OF SCHERTZ This Interlocal Agreement (the "Agreement ") made and entered into as of this the day of , 2016 . (the "Effective Date "), by and between Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority, a conservation and reclamation district created and operating pursuant to Article XVI, § 59 of the Texas Constitution (the "Authority "), and the City of Schertz, Texas, a home -rule municipality operating pursuant to the Constitution and laws of the State of Texas (the "City "), for the expansion of the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant ( "WHTP "). The Authority and the City are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties." RECITALS WHEREAS, the Authority is a regional agency that owns and operates wastewater treatment and reclamation facilities; and WHEREAS, the Authority is the regional agency designated to provide regional wastewater service in the Cibolo Creek Watershed in the vicinity of the City; and WHEREAS, on February 15, 1985, the Authority and the City entered into a "Contract for Sewerage Service" pursuant to which the Authority provides wastewater collection, treatment, and disposal services to the City; and WHEREAS, on June 18, 2012, the Authority and the City entered into an Interlocal Agreement pursuant to which the Authority has operational responsibility over WHTP owned by the City and the City pays the Authority for its operation of WHTP (the "Operation Agreement "); and WHEREAS, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality ( "TCEQ ") issued a new TPDES permit for WHTP on October 13, 2015, TPDES Permit. No. WQ0015371001, that includes an Interim Phase and a Final. Phase that allows for expansion of WHTP from 0.046 millions of gallons per day ( "MGD ") to 0.092 MGD; and WHEREAS, due to the growth within the vicinity of the City and the Authority's service area, the Parties desire to pursue expansion of WHTP to the Final Phase of 0.092 MGD (the "Expansion "); and WHEREAS, the City desires the Authority to undertake the efforts for planning, designing, and constructing the Expansion, while the City commits to pay all costs, fees, and expenses associated with the Expansion; WHEREAS, the Authority and the City, exercising their respective mutual authorities, wish to enter into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions for the Authority to pursue planning, design and construction of the Expansion and for the City to pay for all costs, fees, and expenses for and associated with the Expansion; and Error! Unknown document property name. WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, and the general and special laws of the State of Texas, the Parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement; and WHEREAS, this Agreement shall have no effect or implication on the Contract for Sewerage Services or the Operation Agreement and such contract and agreement shall remain in force and effect without regard to the effectiveness or termination of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein . contained, the sufficiency of which are hereby conclusively acknowledged, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Authority and the City mutually undertake, promise, and agree as follows: AGREEMENT Section 1. Definitions. The following terms and expressions as hereinafter used in this Agreement, unless the context clearly shows otherwise, shall have the following meanings: Authority. The Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority. Cam. The City of Schertz, Texas. Effective Date. The day and year set forth in the preamble of the Agreement. Expansion. The expansion of the WHTP from 0.046 MGD to 0.092 MGD in accordance with the TPDES Permit. MGD. Millions of gallons per day. Operation Agreement. That certain agreement entered into on June 18, 2012 by and between the Authority and the City regarding the operation of the WHTP. TCE . The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, or its successor agency. TPDES Permit. The Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Permit No. WQ0015371.001, as issued by TCEQ to the City and the Authority for the WHTP and included as Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein. WHTP. The Woman Hollering Treatment Plant and any additions, improvements or expansions, owned by the City. This plant was formerly known as the Sedona Wastewater Treatment Plant and previously permitted under TPDES :Permit No. WQ001.4667001. Error! Unknown document property name. Section 2. Authority Obligations for Expansion. (a) The Authority shall be solely responsible for the planning, design and construction of the Expansion. Included in Exhibit B is as Technical Memorandum prepared by Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. that identifies and evaluates two alternatives for completing the Expansion. The Authority has selected Alternative 1 for the Expansion that provides for adding to the WHTPP a parallel package treatment plant similar to the existing treatment plant. A cost estimate for Alternative 1 is included in Exhibit B. (b) It is expressly understood and agreed that any obligations on the part of the Authority to plan, design and construct the Expansion shall be conditioned upon the prompt and timely payment of any and all invoices submitted by the Authority to the City for payment as provided in Section 4 below. Time is of the essence for the performance of this Agreement and the receipt of invoices and payments for obligations hereunder. Failure to timely pay the Authority any invoices associated with the Expansion will entitle the Authority to suspend performance of this Agreement until payment for past due invoices are received by the Authority. Section 3. City Obligations for Expansion. City agrees to pay the Authority for any and all costs, fees and expenses associated with the Expansion. The City shall submit payment for Expansion invoices to the Authority within thirty (30) days of receiving each invoice. A cost estimate of the Expansion is included in Exhibit B. Section 4. Source of Payment for Expansion. (a) The City represents and covenants that all payments to be made by it under this Agreement shall constitute reasonable and necessary "operating expenses" of the City's utility system, as defined in Section 1502.056, Texas Government Code. The City further represents that its governing body has determined that the utility services to be provided by the Expansion of WHTP are absolutely necessary and essential to treat the wastewater of the City, as contemplated by this Agreement. (b) The City agrees throughout the term of this Agreement to implement such rates and charges for retail wastewater service to be supplied by its wastewater system as will produce gross revenues at all times during the term of this Agreement in an amount at least equal to all of the expenses of operation and maintenance of the City's system, and all other contract or revenue bond indebtedness or obligations of the City, including specifically payment for the Expansion under this Agreement. Section 5. Coordination on Expansion. During the performance of this Agreement, the Authority will regularly coordinate with the City to ensure that the City is receiving timely progress reports and information on status of the Expansion. Section 6. Term of Agreement. This Agreement shall commence on the Effective Date and shall continue in force and effect until such time that the Expansion is completed, or April 1, 2017, . whichever occurs first. Notwithstanding, either Party may terminate this Agreement upon at least sixty (60) days written notice to the other Party. Upon termination, the City will be liable for the payment of any expenditures made pursuant to this Agreement on or before the date on which termination is effective. Section 7. Amendment and Modification. This Agreement shall not be amended except in writing by both Parties hereto. No change, amendment, or modification of this Error! Unknown document property name. Agreement shall be made or be effective which will affect adversely the prompt payment when due of all money required to be paid by the City under the terms of this Agreement. Section 8. Force Maieure. Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, the Parties hereto shall not be under any liability or be deemed to be in default with respect to their obligations under this Agreement for any failure to perform or for delay in performing such obligations hereunder (except for the obligation to pay money) where such failure or delay is due to force majeure, while and to the extent that such performance is prevented by such cause. The term force majeure means acts of God, fire, storm, flood, drought, war, terrorist activity, riots, sabotage, strikes or other differences with labor (whether or not within the power of the Parties to settle same), decrees or orders of the courts or other governmental authority, or other similar or dissimilar causes not within the reasonable control of such party and not due to negligence of such party. The Parties shall use due diligence to resume performance of any obligation suspended by force majeure at the earliest practicable time. Section 9. Regulatory Bodies and Laws. This Agreement is subject to all applicable Federal and State Laws and any applicable permits, ordinances, rules, orders, and regulations of any local, state or federal governmental authority having or asserting jurisdiction, but nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of any right to question or contest any such law, ordinance, order, rule, or regulation in any forum, having jurisdiction. Section 10. Notices. Unless otherwise provided herein, any notice, communication, request, reply, or advice (herein severally and collectively, for convenience, called "Notice ") herein provided or permitted to be given, made, or accepted by any Party to any other Party must be in writing and may be given or be served by depositing the same in the United States mail postpaid and registered or certified and addressed to the Party to be notified, with return receipt requested, or by delivering the same to an officer of such Party, or by electronic mail, addressed to the Party to be notified at the email address provided below. Notice deposited in the mail in the manner hereinabove described shall be conclusively deemed to be effective, unless otherwise stated herein, from and after the expiration of three (3) days after it is so deposited. Notice given in any other manner shall be effective only if and when received by the Party to be notified. For the purposes of Notice, the addresses and contact information of the Parties shall, until changed as hereinafter provided, be as follows: If to the Authority, to: Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority Attn: General Manager P.O. Box 930 100 Dietz Road Schertz, Texas 781.54 email: cellis @ccmatx.org If to the City, to: City of Schertz, Texas Attn: City Manager Error! Unknown document property name. 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, TX 78154 email: jkessel@schertz.com The Parties hereto shall have the right from time to time and at any time to change their respective Notice information with at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the other Parties hereto. Section 11. Severability. The Parties hereto specifically agree that in case any one or more of the sections, subsections, provisions, clauses, or words of this Agreement or the application of such sections, subsections, provisions, clauses, or words to any situation or circumstance should be, or should be held to be, for any reason, invalid or unconstitutional, under the laws or constitutions of the State or the United States of America, or in contravention of any such laws or constitutions, such invalidity, unconstitutionality, or contravention shall not affect any other sections, subsections, provisions, clauses, or words of this Agreement or the application of such sections, subsections, provisions, clauses, or words to any other situation or circumstance, and it is intended that this Agreement shall be severable and shall be construed and applied as if any such invalid or unconstitutional section, subsection, provision, clause, or word had not been included herein, and the rights and obligations of the Parties hereto shall be construed and remain in force accordingly. Section 12. Remedies Upon Default. It is not intended hereby to specify (and this Agreement shall not be considered as specifying) an exclusive remedy for any default, but all such other remedies existing at law or in equity may be availed of by any Party hereto and shall be cumulative. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement, any right or remedy or any default hereunder, except the right of the Authority to receive payment for the Expansion, which shall never be determined to be waived, shall be deemed to be conclusively waived unless asserted by a proper proceeding at law or in equity within two (2) years plus one (1) day after the occurrence of such default. No waiver or waivers of any breach or default (or any breaches or defaults) by any Party hereto or of the performance by any other Party of any duty or obligation hereunder shall be deemed a waiver thereof in the future, nor shall any such waiver or waivers be deemed or construed to be a waiver of subsequent breaches or defaults of any kind, character or description, under any circumstances. Section 13. Indemnification. IN ADDITION TO THE OTHER REMEDIES AFFORDED TO THE AUTHORITY IN THIS AGREEMENT, AND ONLY TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, CITY SHALL RELEASE, INDEMNIFY, DEFEND AND HOLD HARMLESS THE AUTHORITY, ITS OFFICERS, DIRECTORS, EMPLOYEES, CONTRACTORS AND AGENTS (THE ".INDEMNIFIED PARTIES") FOR, FROM AND AGAINST ANY AND ALL LOSS, COST, EXPENSE, CLAIM, ACTION, PROCEEDING BEFORE ANY GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITY OR ARBITRAL TRIBUNAL, DEMAND, DAMAGE, FINE, LIABILITY, OBLIGATION OR PENALTY, LIEN, CAUSE OF ACTION, SUIT AND EXPENSE (INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, COURT COSTS, REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF INVESTIGATION, REMOVAL AND REMEDIATION, AND GOVERNMENTAL OVERSIGHT COSTS), ENVI.RONMENTAL OR OTHERWISE OF ANY NATURE, KIND OR DESCRIPTION OF ANY PERSON OR ENTITY DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY ARISING OUT OF, RESULTING FROM, OR RELATED TO Error! Unknown document property name. (IN WHOLE OR IN PART) 1) THE CITY'S PERFORMANCE OR OMISSION OF ITS OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, AND 2) THE AUTHORITY'S PERFORMANCE OF ITS OBLIGATIONS PURSUANT TO THIS AGREEMENT, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT CAUSED BY THE GROSS NEGLIGENCE OR WILLFUL MISCONDUCT OF ANY ONE OR MORE OF THE INDEMNIFIED PARTIES. Section 14. Venue. All amounts due under this Agreement, including, but not limited to, payments due under this Agreement or damages for the breach of this Agreement, shall be due in Guadalupe County, Texas, which is the County in which the principal administrative offices of the Authority and the City are located and the County where this Agreement is performable. In the event that any legal proceeding is brought to enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, the same shall be brought in the State District Court of Guadalupe County, Texas. The Parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of said court. Section 15. Sole Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement of the Authority and the City and supersedes any prior understanding or oral or written agreements between the Authority and the City with respect to the subject matter of this Agreement. Section 16. No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Agreement shall inure only to the benefit of the Parties hereto and third persons not privy hereto shall not, in any form or manner, be considered a third -party beneficiary of this Agreement. Section 17. Succession and Assignment. This Agreement is binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties, their heirs, successors and assigns. This Agreement may not be assigned by any Party hereto without the prior written notice to, and prior written approval by, the other Party. Section 1.8. Recitals and Exhibits Incorporated. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof and the exhibits hereto are hereby found to be true, and such recitals and exhibits are hereby made a part of this Agreement for all purposes. Section 19. Authority to Execute. Each person signing on behalf of the Parties hereby confirms that they have the authority to execute this Agreement on behalf of the Party indicated by their signature. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto acting under authority of their respective governing bodies have caused this Agreement to be duly executed in several counterparts, each of which shall constitute an original, all as of the day and year first above written, which is the Effective Date of this Agreement. (Signatures on following pages) Error! Unknown document property name. 1 . , . Board President Date ATTEST: STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 2016, . by , President of the Board of Directors of Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority, a conservation and reclamation district created under Article 16, Section 59, of the Texas Constitution, on behalf of said conservation and reclamation district. Notary Public, State of Texas Printed Name of Notary: My Commission Expires: Error! Unknown document property name. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Date ATTEST: STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE This instrument was acknowledged before me on this day of , 2016, . by of the City of Schertz, a home -rule municipality and political subdivision of the State of Texas, on behalf of said municipality. Notary Public, State of Texas Printed Name of Notary: My Commission Expires: Error! Unknown document property name. VAIIs v 11092 3Ok's901►7U111I Error! Unknown document property name. M110C QI sIOl1[9k\ICU1NUOXIL■WX71L'M[1]LNI Error! Unknown document property name. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows Figure 1: Existing Service Area and Facility Location As the service area for the Plant grown in population and number of connections, the inflow being treated at the Plant has increased significantly. According to the TCEQ guidance, when the 30 -day running average of the Plant influent flow reaches 75% of the permitted flow for three consecutive months they must begin evaluating the current operating system for future capacity needs. According to historical discharge data, the flow is beginning to approach 75% of the permitted treatment capacity and thus an investigation is necessary in order to determine ways in which the future flows may 2of9 � _°( fu .,pie" .,. i. -nr . , t I. ,� o , it L .. I[� . .t 1. .;.', c -, X TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows be treated as they continue to increase. CCMA retained the services of Alan Plummer Associates, Inc. (APAI) in order to evaluate the available data and alternatives for handling increased flow in accordance with the permit, such that the Plant may avoid any possible permit violations. TPDES PERMIT Right now, the Plant is operating under the Interim Phase of the current permit which was issued by the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) on October 13, 2015. The permit is included as Attachment A to this report. Table 1 shows the discharge limitations under this phase. Table 1: Woman Hollering Plant Discharge Limitations Effluent Characteristic Daily Average Flow; MGD 0.046 Biological Oxygen Demand; mg /L 10 Total Suspended Solids; mg /L 15 Ammonia; mg /L 2 E. coli; CFU 126 Dissolved Oxygen; mg /L 6.0 The permit also includes provisions for a "Future" phase in which the Plant is authorized to discharge effluent volumes up to 0.096 million gallons per day (MGD), twice the current permitted discharge rate. In accordance with the section "Operational Requirements ", item number 8. a. of the TPDES permit, the permittee shall initiate engineering and financial planning for a capacity expansion whenever flow measurement at the existing facility reaches 75% of the permitted daily average flow for three consecutive months. And whenever flow measurements at the existing facility reach 90% of the permitted daily average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee shall obtain authorization from the TCEQ to commence construction of an expansion. Since the current permit already authorizes a capacity expansion, the path forward for Schertz and CCMA is to plan (design and financial) for additional capacity since the increased discharge is already authorized. WASTEWATER QUANTITY DATA Discharge flow data has been collected since the Plant began operation. This historical data was evaluated for trends and future increases. The daily data collected from January 2013 through May 2016, 3of9 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM VVOnl8n Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Of/\lt8[n@tim8S to Treat Increasing Flows ha shown graphically in Figure 2. Figure 2 also reflects the results of several severe storm events that have occurred in the area over the past year. The shift from extreme drought conditions in 2013 to excess rainfall conditions in 2015 increased the inflow arriving at the Plant. More recent influent trends at the Plant are highlighted in Figure 3. Figure 2: Historical Influent Flow bm Woman Hollering Plant Although the drastic peaks in the Figure 2 were direct results of heavy rainfall in May and October of2015 and again in March and May of 2016, a monthly influent growth trend of approximately 1.0% has been determined through data analysis and is displayed as the blue dashed line in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows that the influent flow to the Plant will reach 75% of the permitted flow for 3 consecutive months by July of 4of9 us Km! re, cUec� uc�, kechm r f""i t mmmanho||emnguKwmouiwaa_mmimwd 1nox 0.050 Aptil and May 2016 - 17" Rainfall 0A46 MGQ —30 Day Avg —Permitted Flow Feb and March 2015 - 7' Rainfall —Monthly Avg Oct and Nov 2015 - 13 " Rainfall 0.0346 MGD \ May and June 2015 24" Rainfall 0.030 U. 0.020 0.010 0.000 Date Figure 2: Historical Influent Flow bm Woman Hollering Plant Although the drastic peaks in the Figure 2 were direct results of heavy rainfall in May and October of2015 and again in March and May of 2016, a monthly influent growth trend of approximately 1.0% has been determined through data analysis and is displayed as the blue dashed line in Figure 4. Figure 4 shows that the influent flow to the Plant will reach 75% of the permitted flow for 3 consecutive months by July of 4of9 us Km! re, cUec� uc�, kechm r f""i t mmmanho||emnguKwmouiwaa_mmimwd 1nox TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows 2016, and may reach 90% by about May of 2017. The following section offers capacity expansion alternatives for the Owner to consider once the Plant reaches this point in time. MM Monthly Avg 004 —Permitted Flow — — 75% of Permitted Flow S 0.03 0 U. 0 0.01 0 MGQ 0346 . 0 1 0.039 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — �P_n — — — — — — — — — — — Sampling Month - 2016 Figure 3: 2016 Flows at Woman Hollering Plant 5 of 9 Y) TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows Figure 4: Projected Influent Flow to Woman Hollering Plant TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES There are two potential options for increasing the flow being treated at the existing Plant in a short time frame. The first option discussed in depth is presented as Alternative No.1 and suggests that Schertz leases another package plant with capacity to treat 0.046 MGD of wastewater flow. The second option, presented as Alternative No. 2, proposes that the Schertz acquire the services of a licensed hauler to transport wastewater flows from the Plant to another wastewater treatment plant for treatment and discharge. This section of the report explores both alternatives and includes costs and startup times for each. 6of9 }s-„ rneo `�..,, 0.050 e6 MD a " 0-040 - -+ a ,6 MD 0.030 ......... a M April -June 2016: Three (3) consecutive months exceeding 75/ discharge limit 3 0 U. r0.020 -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- C C x Monthly Avg 0.010 - Projected Avg Permitted Plow 75% of Permitted Flow 0.000 Cute Figure 4: Projected Influent Flow to Woman Hollering Plant TREATMENT ALTERNATIVES There are two potential options for increasing the flow being treated at the existing Plant in a short time frame. The first option discussed in depth is presented as Alternative No.1 and suggests that Schertz leases another package plant with capacity to treat 0.046 MGD of wastewater flow. The second option, presented as Alternative No. 2, proposes that the Schertz acquire the services of a licensed hauler to transport wastewater flows from the Plant to another wastewater treatment plant for treatment and discharge. This section of the report explores both alternatives and includes costs and startup times for each. 6of9 }s-„ rneo `�..,, TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows ALTERNATIVE 1 — Parallel Package Plant at Existing Site The existing package plant is rated at 0.046 MGD and was designed and installed by AUC Group in 2010. The Plant consists of a manual bar screen, aeration basin, final clarifier, chlorine contact basin, and sludge digestion basin. The final effluent is conveyed to Woman Hollering Creek for discharge and digested sludge is hauled to CCMA Odo J. Riedel Water Reclamation Facility (CCMA OJR) for treatment, dewatering, and final disposal. A twin package plant could be rented from the same manufacturer and influent flow could split to each bar screen for treatment by either the existing package plant or the new package plant, as shown on the site in Figure 5. Figure 5: Proposed Package Plant Location 7of9 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows 2 Year Costs, Construction and O &M = $511,700 See Attachment B for detailed cost estimate for Alternative No. 1. Startup time = 60 -90 Days ALTERNATIVE 2 — Haul Wastewater from Existing Site to Another Treatment Plant In order to reduce the flow being treated at the existing plant, the City of Schertz could employ the services of a registered hauler to load and transport 5,500 gallons of wastewater from the aeration basin at Woman Hollering Treatment Plant to another TCEQ permitted wastewater treatment plant as shown schematically in Figure 6. CCMA OJR is located within relatively close proximity to the Plant, a five mile drive directly north. CCMA has capacity to accept the screened wastewater at the front of the plant. The hauling truck would pump the Woman Hollering wastewater from the aeration basin into the tank of the truck. It would then transport the volume to CCMA OJR where it would pump the screened wastewater into the headworks splitter box. The flow would then be treated by the existing CCMA OJR activated sludge system and discharged to Cibolo Creek in accordance with TPDES Permit No. WQ0011269001. Costs associated with Alternative No. 2 include site improvements at the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant in order to allow for uninterruptible access to the facility via Class 8 tractor and trailer. Figure 6: Proposed Flow Diagram for Wastewater Hauling 2 Year Costs, Construction, Contract Services and O &M = $736,600 See Attachment C for detailed cost estimate for Alternative No. 2. Startup time = 30 days RECOMMENDATIONS After careful evaluation of both alternatives and coordination with a service supplier for wastewater hauling and wastewater treatment plant manufacturers, the recommended alternative for handling 8of9 t�.,, �, .�:.,,� t, ri`,C;: t �.. {° .,... <�_ , . , ,'�t .i a� .�tr •t.� �,.... �� , "ii,4., 3;���. xii.w _ r ., ..' .�...1 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows increased wastewater to flow to Woman Hollering Treatment Plant is the installation of an additional package plant. The existing raw sewage influent line will connect to a new junction box so that flow may be split between the two package plants. Effluent flow will collect at another junction box between the package plants and the effluent outfall so that the flow may be combined before conveyance to Woman's Hollow Creek for discharge. The familiarity of the operation of the package plant and affordable two year cost, make this alternative an attractive option for Schertz and CCMA. Although the start -up time is longer than the hauling alternative, the Plant is not projected to exceed 90% of the effluent flow limit until the spring of 2017. This allows sufficient time to install the new parallel package plant if action is taken soon. Implementation of the pump and haul option would require ongoing coordination and scheduling between CCMA and the hauler, with some uncertainty regarding scheduling. There are times at night or weekends may scheduling the hauling operation could present a challenge, particularly during storm events when inflows may be increasing rapidly. Implementation of either option will require notification of TCEQ and coordination related to the existing permit; however, since the Future Phase is already included in the existing permit the addition of capacity with a parallel unit is straightforward. 9of9 TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation of Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank. U Ch ry'ee n v"o I It p,, R ATTACHMENT A CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY TCEQ TPDES PERMIT NO. WQ0015371001 Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank 0� TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY P.O. Box 13087 Austin, Texas 78711 -3087 PERMIT TO DISCHARGE WASTES under provisions of Section 402 of the Clean Water Act and Chapter 26 of the Texas Water Code City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority whose mailing address is c/o Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority P.O. Box 930 Schertz, Texas 78154 TPDES PERMIT NO. WQ0015371001 [For TCEQ office use only - EPA I.D. No. TX6136361] is authorized to treat and discharge wastes from the Woman Hollering Treatment Plant, SIC Code 4952 located at 8705 Greaves Lane, Schertz, in Bexar County, Texas 78154 to Womans Hollow Creek; thence to Martinez Creek; thence to Lower Cibolo Creek in Segment No. 1902 of the San Antonio River Basin only according to effluent limitations, monitoring requirements and other conditions set forth in this permit, as well as the rules of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ), the laws of the State of Texas, and other orders of the TCEQ. The issuance of this permit does not grant to the permittee the right to use private or public property for conveyance of wastewater along the discharge route described in this permit. This includes, but is not limited to, property belonging to any individual, partnership, corporation, or other entity. Neither does this permit authorize any invasion of personal rights nor any violation of federal, state, or local laws or regulations. It is the responsibility of the permittee to acquire property rights as may be necessary to use the discharge route, This permit shall expire at midnight, March 1, 2020. ISSUED DATE: October 13, 2015 For the Com fission City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 INTERIM EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Outfall Number o01 i. During the period beginning upon the date of issuance and lasting through the completion of expansion to the 0.092 million gallons per day (MGD) facility the permittee is authorized to discharge subject to the following effluent limitations: The daily average flow of effluent shall not exceed 0.046 MGD, nor shall the average discharge during any two -hour period (2 -hour peak) exceed 128 gallons per minute (gpm). Effluent Characteristic Flow, MGD Carbonaceous Biochemical Oxygen Demand (5 -day) Total Suspended Solids Ammonia Nitrogen E. coli, CFU or MPN /loo ml Daily Avg 7 -day Avg mg/1 (lbs /day) mg /l Report 10(3-8) 15(5-8) 2(0.77) 126 N/A 15 25 5 N/A Limitations Daily Max Single Grab Min. Self - Monitoring Requirements Report Daily Avg. & Max. Single Grab mg /l mg/l Measurement Frequency Report N/A Continuous 25 35 One /week 40 6o One /week 10 15 One /week N/A 399 One /quarter Sample Type Totalizing Meter Grab Grab Grab Grab P. The effluent shall contain a chlorine residual of at least 1.o mg /l and shall not exceed a chlorine residual of 4.o mg/l after a detention time of at least 20 minutes (based on peak flow), and shall be monitored five times per week by grab sample. An equivalent method of disinfection may be substituted only with prior approval of the Executive Director. 3. The pH shall not be less than 6. o standard units nor greater than 9. o standard units and shall be monitored once per month by grab sample. 4. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts and no discharge of visible oil. 5. Effluent monitoring samples shall be taken at the following location(s): Following the final treatment unit. 6. The effluent shall contain a minimum dissolved oxygen of 6.o mg /l and shall be monitored once per week by grab sample. Page 2 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 FINAL EFFLUENT LIMITATIONS AND MONITORING REQUIREMENTS Outfall Number o01 1. During the period beginning upon the completion of expansion to the 0.092 million gallons per day (MGD) facility and lasting through the date of expiration, the permittee is authorized to discharge subject to the following effluent limitations: The daily average flow of effluent shall not exceed 0.092 MGD, nor shall the average discharge during any two -hour period (2 -hour peak) exceed 256 gallons per minute (gpm). Effluent Characteristic Discharge Limitations Min. Self - Monitoring Requirements Daily Avg 7 -day Avg Daily Max Single Grab Report Daily Avg. & Max. Single Grab mg /l (lbs /day) mg /l mg/l mg /l Measurement Sample Type Frequency Flow, MGD Report N/A Report N/A Continuous Totalizing Meter Carbonaceous Biochemical 10(7-7) 15 25 35 One /week Grab Oxygen Demand (5 -day) Total Suspended Solids 15 (12) 25 40 6o One /week Grab Ammonia Nitrogen 2(1-5) 5 10 15 One /week Grab E. coli, CFU or MPN /loo ml 126 N/A N/A 399 One /quarter Grab 2. The effluent shall contain a chlorine residual of at least 1.o mg /l and shall not exceed a chlorine residual of 4.0 mg/1 after a detention time of at least 20 minutes (based on peak flow), and shall be monitored five times per week by grab sample at each chlorination basin. An equivalent method of disinfection maybe substituted only with prior approval of the Executive Director. 3. The pH shall not be less than 6.o standard units nor greater than 9.o standard units and shall be monitored once per month by grab sample. 4. There shall be no discharge of floating solids or visible foam in other than trace amounts and no discharge of visible oil. 5. Effluent monitoring samples shall be taken at the following location(s): Following the final treatment unit. 6. The effluent shall contain a minimum dissolved oxygen of 6.o mg/1 and shall be monitored once per week by grab sample. Page 2a City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 DEFINITIONS AND STANDARD PERMIT CONDITIONS As required by Title 3o Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 305, certain regulations appear as standard conditions in waste discharge permits. 3o TAC § 305121- 305.129 (relating to Permit Characteristics and Conditions) as promulgated under the Texas Water Code (TWC) §§ 5.103 and 5.105, and the Texas Health and Safety Code (THSC) §§ 361.017 and 361.024(a), establish the characteristics and standards for waste discharge permits, including sewage sludge, and those sections of 40 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 122 adopted by reference by the Commission. The following text includes these conditions and incorporates them into this permit. All definitions in TWC § 26.001 and 3o TAC Chapter 305 shall apply to this permit and are incorporated by reference. Some specific definitions of words or phrases used in this permit are as follows: 1. Flow Measurements a. Annual average flow - the arithmetic average of all daily flow determinations taken within the preceding 12 consecutive calendar months. The annual average flow determination shall consist of daily flow volume determinations made by a totalizing meter, charted on a chart recorder and limited to major domestic wastewater discharge facilities with one million gallons per day or greater permitted flow. b. Daily average flow - the arithmetic average of all determinations of the daily flow within a period of one calendar month. The daily average flow determination shall consist of determinations made on at least four separate days. If instantaneous measurements are used to determine the daily flow, the determination shall be the arithmetic average of all instantaneous measurements taken during that month. Daily average flow determination for intermittent discharges shall consist of a minimum of three flow determinations on days of discharge. c. Daily maximum flow - the highest total flow for any 24 -hour period in a calendar month. d. Instantaneous flow - the measured flow during the minimum time required to interpret the flow measuring device. e. 2 -hour peak flow (domestic wastewater treatment plants) -the maximum flow sustained for a two -hour period during the period of daily discharge. The average of multiple measurements of instantaneous maximum flow within a two -hour period may be used to calculate the 2 -hour peak flow. f. Maximum 2 -hour peal, flow (domestic wastewater treatment plants) - the highest 2 -hour peak flow for any 24 -hour period in a calendar month. 2. Concentration Measurements a. Daily average concentration - the arithmetic average of all effluent samples, composite or grab as required by this permit, within a period of one calendar month, consisting of at least four separate representative measurements. L For domestic wastewater treatment plants - When four samples are not available in a calendar month, the arithmetic average (weighted by flow) of all values in the previous four consecutive month period consisting of at least four measurements shall be utilized as the daily average concentration. Page 3 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 ii. For all other wastewater treatment plants - When four samples are not available in a calendar month, the arithmetic average (weighted by flow) of all values taken during the month shall be utilized as the daily average concentration. b. 7 -day average concentration - the arithmetic average of all effluent samples, composite or grab as required by this permit, within a period of one calendar week, Sunday through Saturday. c. Daily maximum concentration - the maximum concentration measured on a single day, by the sample type specified in the permit, within a period of one calendar month. d. Daily discharge - the discharge of a pollutant measured during a calendar day or any 24- hour period that reasonably represents the calendar day for purposes of sampling. For pollutants with limitations expressed in terms of mass, the daily discharge is calculated as the total mass of the pollutant discharged over the sampling day. For pollutants with limitations expressed in other units of measurement, the daily discharge is calculated as the average measurement of the pollutant over the sampling day. The daily discharge determination of concentration made using a composite sample shall be the concentration of the composite sample. When grab samples are used, the daily discharge determination of concentration shall be the arithmetic average (weighted by flow value) of all samples collected during that day. e. Bacteria concentration (E. coli or Enterococci) - Colony Forming Units (CFU) or Most Probable Number (MPN) of bacteria per loo milliliters effluent. The daily average bacteria concentration is a geometric mean of the values for the effluent samples collected in a calendar month. The geometric mean shall be determined by calculating the nth root of the product of all measurements made in a calendar month, where n equals the number of measurements made; or, computed as the antilogarithm of the arithmetic mean of the logarithms of all measurements made in a calendar month. For any measurement of bacteria equaling zero, a substituted value of one shall be made for input into either computation method. If specified, the 7-day average for bacteria is the geometric mean of the values for all effluent samples collected during a calendar week. f. Daily average loading (lbs /day) -the arithmetic average of all daily discharge loading calculations during a period of one calendar month. These calculations must be made for each day of the month that a parameter is analyzed. The daily discharge, in terms of mass (lbs /day), is calculated as (Flow, MGD x Concentration, mg /l x 8.34)• g. Daily maximum loading (lbs /day) - the highest daily discharge, in terms of mass (lbs /day), within a period of one calendar month. 3. Sample Type a. Composite sample - For domestic wastewater, a composite sample is a sample made up of a minimum of three effluent portions collected in a continuous 24 -hour period or during the period of daily discharge if less than 24 hours, and combined in volumes proportional to flow, and collected at the intervals required by 3o TAC § 319.9 (a). For industrial wastewater, a composite sample is a sample made up of a minimum of three effluent portions collected in a continuous 24 -hour period or during the period of daily discharge if less than 24 hours, and combined in volumes proportional to flow, and collected at the intervals required by 3o TAC § 319.9 (b). Page 4 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 b. Grab sample -an individual sample collected in less than 15 minutes. 4. Treatment Facility (facility) - wastewater facilities used in the conveyance, storage, treatment, recycling, reclamation and /or disposal of domestic sewage, industrial wastes, agricultural wastes, recreational wastes, or other wastes including sludge handling or disposal facilities under the jurisdiction of the Commission. 5. The term "sewage sludge" is defined as solid, semi - solid, or liquid residue generated during the treatment of domestic sewage in 3o TAC Chapter 312. This includes the solids that have not been classified as hazardous waste separated from wastewater by unit processes. 6. Bypass - the intentional diversion of a waste stream from any portion of a treatment facility. MONITORING AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS 1. Self- Reporting Monitoring results shall be provided at the intervals specified in the permit. Unless otherwise specified in this permit or otherwise ordered by the Commission, the permittee shall conduct effluent sampling and reporting in accordance with 3o TAC §§ 319.4 - 319.12. Unless otherwise specified, a monthly effluent report shall be submitted each month, to the Enforcement Division (MC 224), by the 20th day of the following month for each discharge which is described by this permit whether or not a discharge is made for that month. Monitoring results must be reported on an approved self- report form that is signed and certified as required by Monitoring and Reporting Requirements No. 10. As provided by state law, the permittee is subject to administrative, civil and criminal penalties, as applicable, for negligently or knowingly violating the Clean Water Act (CWA); TWC §§ 26, 27, and 28; and THSC § 361, including but not limited to knowingly making any false statement, representation, or certification on any report, record, or other document submitted or required to be maintained under this permit, including monitoring reports or reports of compliance or noncompliance, or falsifying, tampering with or knowingly rendering inaccurate any monitoring device or method required by this permit or violating any other requirement imposed by state or federal regulations. 2. 'rest Procedures a. Unless otherwise specified in this permit, test procedures for the analysis of pollutants shall comply with procedures specified in 3o TAC §§ 319.11- 319.12. Measurements, tests, and calculations shall be accurately accomplished in a representative manner. b. All laboratory tests submitted to demonstrate compliance with this permit must meet the requirements of 3o TAC § 25, Environmental Testing Laboratory Accreditation and Certification. 3. Records of Results a. Monitoring samples and measurements shall be taken at times and in a manner so as to be representative of the monitored activity. Page 5 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 b. Except for records of monitoring information required by this permit related to the permittee's sewage sludge use and disposal activities, which shall be retained for a period of at least five years (or longer as required by 40 CFR Part 503), monitoring and reporting records, including strip charts and records of calibration and maintenance, copies of all records required by this permit, records of all data used to complete the application for this permit, and the certification required by 40 CFR § 264.73(b)(9) shall be retained at the facility site, or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative for a period of three years from the date of the record or sample, measurement, report, application or certification. This period shall be extended at the request of the Executive Director. c. Records of monitoring activities shall include the following: L date, time and place of sample or measurement; ii. identity of individual who collected the sample or made the measurement. iii. date and time of analysis; iv. identity of the individual and laboratory who performed the analysis; v. the technique or method of analysis; and vi. the results of the analysis or measurement and quality assurance /quality control records. The period during which records are required to be kept shall be automatically extended to the date of the final disposition of any administrative or judicial enforcement action that may be instituted against the permittee. 4. Additional Monitoring by Permittee If the permittee monitors any pollutant at the location(s) designated herein more frequently than required by this permit using approved analytical methods as specified above, all results of such monitoring shall be included in the calculation and reporting of the values submitted on the approved self- report form. Increased frequency of sampling shall be indicated on the self- report form. 5. Calibration of Instruments All automatic flow measuring or recording devices and all totalizing meters for measuring flows shall be accurately calibrated by a trained person at plant start -up and as often thereafter as necessary to ensure accuracy, but not less often than annually unless authorized by the Executive Director for a longer period. Such person shall verify in writing that the device is operating properly and giving accurate results. Copies of the verification shall be retained at the facility site and /or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative for a period of three years. 6. Compliance Schedule Reports Reports of compliance or noncompliance with, or any progress reports on, interim and final requirements contained in any compliance schedule of the permit shall be submitted no later Page 6 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 than 14 days following each schedule date to the Regional Office and the Enforcement Division (MC 224). 7. Noncompliance Notification a. In accordance with 30 TAC § 305.125(g) any noncompliance which may endanger human health or safety, or the environment shall be reported by the permittee to the TCEQ. Report of such information shall be provided orally or by facsimile transmission (FAX) to the Regional Office within 24 hours of becoming aware of the noncompliance. A written submission of such information shall also be provided by the permittee to the Regional Office and the Enforcement Division (MC 224) within five working days of becoming aware of the noncompliance. The written submission shall contain a description of the noncompliance and its cause; the potential danger to human health or safety, or the environment; the period of noncompliance, including exact dates and times; if the noncompliance has not been corrected, the time it is expected to continue; and steps taken or planned to reduce, eliminate, and prevent recurrence of the noncompliance, and to mitigate its adverse effects. b. The following violations shall be reported under Monitoring and Reporting Requirement 7.a.: L Unauthorized discharges as defined in Permit Condition 2(g). ii. Any unanticipated bypass that exceeds any effluent limitation in the permit. iii. Violation of a permitted maximum daily discharge limitation for pollutants listed specifically in the Other Requirements section of an Industrial TPDES permit. c. In addition to the above, any effluent violation which deviates from the permitted effluent limitation by more than 40% shall be reported by the permittee in writing to the Regional Office and the Enforcement Division (MC 224) within 5 working days of becoming aware of the noncompliance. d. Any noncompliance other than that specified in this section, or any required information not submitted or submitted incorrectly, shall be reported to the Enforcement Division (MC 224) as promptly as possible. For effluent limitation violations, noncompliances shall be reported on the approved self- report form. 8. In accordance with the procedures described in 3o TAC §§ 35,301 - 35.303 (relating to Water Quality Emergency and Temporary Orders) if the permittee knows in advance of the need for a bypass, it shall submit prior notice by applying for such authorization. 9. Changes in Discharges of Toxic Substances All existing manufacturing, commercial, mining, and silvicultural permittees shall notify the Regional Office, orally or by facsimile transmission within 24 hours, and both the Regional Office and the Enforcement Division (MC 224) in writing within five (5) working days, after becoming aware of or having reason to believe: a. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in the discharge, on a routine or frequent basis, of any toxic pollutant listed at 40 CFR Part 122, Appendix D, Page 7 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 Tables II and III (excluding Total Phenols) which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": i. One hundred micrograms per liter (loo pg /L); ii. Two hundred micrograms per liter (200 pg /L) for acrolein and acrylonitrile; five hundred micrograms per liter (500 µg /L) for 24- dinitrophenol and for 2- methyl- 4,6-dinitrophenol; and one milligram per liter (1 mg /L) for antimony; iii. Five (5) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application; or iv. The level established by the TCEQ. b. That any activity has occurred or will occur which would result in any discharge, on a nonroutine or infrequent basis, of a toxic pollutant which is not limited in the permit, if that discharge will exceed the highest of the following "notification levels ": L Five hundred micrograms per liter (50o µg /L); ii. One milligram per liter (1 mg /L) for antimony; iii. Ten (lo) times the maximum concentration value reported for that pollutant in the permit application; or iv. The level established by the TCEQ. lo. Signatories to Reports All reports and other information requested by the Executive Director shall be signed by the person and in the manner required by 3o TAC § 305.128 (relating to Signatories to Reports). u. All Publicly Owned Treatment Works (POTWs) must provide adequate notice to the Executive Director of the following: a. Any new introduction of pollutants into the POTW from an indirect discharger which would be subject to CWA § 301 or § 306 if it were directly discharging those pollutants; b. Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced into that POTW by a source introducing pollutants into the POTW at the time of issuance of the permit; and c. For the purpose of this paragraph, adequate notice shall include information on: L The quality and quantity of effluent introduced into the POTW; and ii. Any anticipated impact of the change on the quantity or quality of effluent to be discharged from the POTW. Um City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 PERMIT CONDITIONS 1. General a. When the permittee becomes aware that it failed to submit any relevant facts in a permit application, or submitted incorrect information in an application or in any report to the Executive Director, it shall promptly submit such facts or information. b. This permit is granted on the basis of the information supplied and representations made by the permittee during action on an application, and relying upon the accuracy and completeness of that information and those representations. After notice and opportunity for a hearing, this permit may be modified, suspended, or revoked, in whole or in part, in accordance with 3o TAC Chapter 305, Subchapter D, during its term for good cause including, but not limited to, the following: i. Violation of any terms or conditions of this permit; ii. Obtaining this permit by misrepresentation or failure to disclose fully all relevant facts; or iii. A change in any condition that requires either a temporary or permanent reduction or elimination of the authorized discharge. c. The permittee shall furnish to the Executive Director, upon request and within a reasonable time, any information to determine whether cause exists for amending, revoking, suspending or terminating the permit. The permittee shall also furnish to the Executive Director, upon request, copies of records required to be kept by the permit. 2. Compliance a. Acceptance of the permit by the person to whom it is issued constitutes acknowledgment and agreement that such person will comply with all the terms and conditions embodied in the permit, and the rules and other orders of the Commission. b. The permittee has a duty to comply with all conditions of the permit. Failure to comply with any permit condition constitutes a violation of the permit and the Texas Water Code or the Texas Health and Safety Code, and is grounds for enforcement action, for permit amendment, revocation, or suspension, or for denial of a permit renewal application or an application for a permit for another facility. c. It shall not be a defense for a permittee in an enforcement action that it would have been necessary to halt or reduce the permitted activity in order to maintain compliance with the conditions of the permit. d. The permittee shall take all reasonable steps to minimize or prevent any discharge or sludge use or disposal or other permit violation that has a reasonable likelihood of adversely affecting human health or the environment. e. Authorization from the Commission is required before beginning any change in the permitted facility or activity that may result in noncompliance with any permit requirements. Um City of Sehertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 f. A permit may be amended, suspended and reissued, or revoked for cause in accordance with 3o TAC §§ 305.62 and 305.66 and TWC§ 7.302. The filing of a request by the permittee for a permit amendment, suspension and reissuance, or termination, or a notification of planned changes or anticipated noncompliance, does not stay any permit condition. g. There shall be no unauthorized discharge of wastewater or any other waste. For the purpose of this permit, an unauthorized discharge is considered to be any discharge of wastewater into or adjacent to water in the state at any location not permitted as an outfall or otherwise defined in the Other Requirements section of this permit. h. In accordance with 30 TAC § 305.535(a), the permittee may allow any bypass to occur from a TPDES permitted facility which does not cause permitted effluent limitations to be exceeded or an unauthorized discharge to occur, but only if the bypass is also for essential maintenance to assure efficient operation. L The permittee is subject to administrative, civil, and criminal penalties, as applicable, under TWC §§ 7.051- 7.075 (relating to Administrative Penalties), 7.101- 7.111 (relating to Civil Penalties), and 7.141- 7.202 (relating to Criminal Offenses and Penalties) for violations including, but not limited to, negligently or knowingly violating the federal CWA §§ 301, 302, 306, 307,3o8, 318, or 405, or any condition or limitation implementing any sections in a permit issued under the CWA § 402, or any requirement imposed in a pretreatment program approved under the CWA §§ 402 (a)(3) or 402 (b)(8). 3. Inspections and Entry a. Inspection and entry shall be allowed as prescribed in the TWC Chapters 26, 27, and 28, and THSC § 361. b. The members of the Commission and employees and agents of the Commission are entitled to enter any public or private property at any reasonable time for the purpose of inspecting and investigating conditions relating to the quality of water in the state or the compliance with any rule, regulation, permit or other order of the Commission. Members, employees, or agents of the Commission and Commission contractors are entitled to enter public or private property at any reasonable time to investigate or monitor or, if the responsible party is not responsive or there is an immediate danger to public health or the environment, to remove or remediate a condition related to the quality of water in the state. Members, employees, Commission contractors, or agents acting under this authority who enter private property shall observe the establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection, and if the property has management in residence, shall notify management or the person then in charge of his presence and shall exhibit proper credentials. If any member, employee, Commission contractor, or agent is refused the right to enter in or on public or private property under this authority, the Executive Director may invoke the remedies authorized in TWC § 7.002. The statement above, that Commission entry shall occur in accordance with an establishment's rules and regulations concerning safety, internal security, and fire protection, is not grounds for denial or restriction of entry to any part of the facility, but merely describes the Commission's duty to observe appropriate rules and regulations during an inspection. Page 10 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 4. Permit Amendment and /or Renewal a. The permittee shall give notice to the Executive Director as soon as possible of any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility if such alterations or additions would require a permit amendment or result in a violation of permit requirements. Notice shall also be required under this paragraph when: L The alteration or addition to a permitted facility may meet one of the criteria for determining whether a facility is a new source in accordance with 3o TAC § 305.534 (relating to New Sources and New Dischargers); or ii. The alteration or addition could significantly change the nature or increase the quantity of pollutants discharged. This notification applies to pollutants that are subject neither to effluent limitations in the permit, nor to notification requirements in Monitoring and Reporting Requirements No. 9; iii. The alteration or addition results in a significant change in the permittee's sludge use or disposal practices, and such alteration, addition, or change may justify the application of permit conditions that are different from or absent in the existing permit, including notification of additional use or disposal sites not reported during the permit application process or not reported pursuant to an approved land application plan. b. Prior to any facility modifications, additions, or expansions that will increase the plant capacity beyond the permitted flow, the permittee must apply for and obtain proper authorization from the Commission before commencing construction. c. The permittee must apply for an amendment or renewal at least is days prior to expiration of the existing permit: in order to continue a permitted activity after the expiration date of the permit. If an application is submitted prior to the expiration date of the permit, the existing permit shall remain in effect until the application is approved, denied, or returned. If the application is returned or denied, authorization to continue such activity shall terminate upon the effective date of the action. If an application is not submitted prior to the expiration date of the permit, the permit shall expire and authorization to continue such activity shall terminate. d. Prior to accepting or generating wastes which are not described in the permit application or which would result in a significant change in the quantity or quality of the existing discharge, the permittee must report the proposed changes to the Commission. The permittee must apply for a permit amendment reflecting any necessary changes in permit conditions, including effluent limitations for pollutants not identified and limited by this permit. e. In accordance with the TWC § 26.029(b), after a public hearing, notice of which shall be given to the permittee, the Commission may require the permittee, from time to time, for good cause, in accordance with applicable laws, to conform to new or additional conditions. f. If any toxic effluent standard or prohibition (including any schedule of compliance specified in such effluent standard or prohibition) is promulgated under CWA § 307(a) for a toxic pollutant which is present in the discharge and that standard or prohibition is more stringent than any limitation on the pollutant in this permit, this permit shall be Page 11 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 modified or revoked and reissued to conform to the toxic effluent standard or prohibition. The permittee shall comply with effluent standards or prohibitions established under CWA § 307(a) for toxic pollutants within the time provided in the regulations that established those standards or prohibitions, even if the permit has not yet been modified to incorporate the requirement. 5. Permit Transfer a. Prior to any transfer of this permit, Commission approval must be obtained. The Commission shall be notified in writing of any change in control or ownership of facilities authorized by this permit. Such notification should be sent to the Applications Review and Processing Team (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division. b. A permit maybe transferred only according to the provisions of 3o TAC § 305.64 (relating to Transfer of Permits) and 3o TAC § 50.133 (relating to Executive Director Action on Application or WQMP update). 6. Relationship to Hazardous Waste Activities This permit does not authorize any activity of hazardous waste storage, processing, or disposal that requires a permit or other authorization pursuant to the Texas Health and Safety Code. 7. Relationship to Water Rights Disposal of treated effluent by any means other than discharge directly to water in the state must be specifically authorized in this permit and may require a permit pursuant to TWC Chapter 11. S. Property Rights A permit does not convey any property rights of any sort, or any exclusive privilege. g. Permit Enforceability The conditions of this permit are severable, and if any provision of this permit, or the application of any provision of this permit to any circumstances, is held invalid, the application of such provision to other circumstances, and the remainder of this permit, shall not be affected thereby. lo. Relationship to Permit Application The application pursuant to which the permit has been issued is incorporated herein; provided, however, that in the event of a conflict between the provisions of this permit and the application, the provisions of the permit shall control. 11. Notice of Bankruptcy a. Each permittee shall notify the Executive Director, in writing, immediately following the Ming of a voluntary or involuntary petition for bankruptcy under any chapter of Title 11 Bankruptcy) of the United States Code (11 USC) by or against: Page 12 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 i. the permittee; ii. an entity (as that term is defined in 11 USC, § 101(14)) controlling the permittee or listing the permit or permittee as property of the estate; or iii. an affiliate (as that term is defined in 11 USC, § 101(2)) of the permittee. b. This notification must indicate: i. the name of the permittee and the permit number(s); ii. the bankruptcy court in which the petition for bankruptcy was filed; and iii. the date of filing of the petition. OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1. The permittee shall at all times ensure that the facility and all of its systems of collection, treatment, and disposal are properly operated and maintained. This includes, but is not limited to, the regular, periodic examination of wastewater solids within the treatment plant by the operator in order to maintain an appropriate quantity and quality of solids inventory as described in the various operator training manuals and according to accepted industry standards for process control. Process control, maintenance, and operations records shall be retained at the facility site, or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative, for a period of three years. 2. Upon request by the Executive Director, the permittee shall take appropriate samples and provide proper analysis in order to demonstrate compliance with Commission rules. Unless otherwise specified in this permit or otherwise ordered by the Commission, the permittee shall comply with all applicable provisions of 3o TAC Chapter 312 concerning sewage sludge use and disposal and 3o TAC §§ 319.21 - 319.29 concerning the discharge of certain hazardous metals. 3. Domestic wastewater treatment facilities shall comply with the following provisions: a. The permittee shall notify the Municipal Permits Team, Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division, in writing, of any facility expansion at least 90 days prior to conducting such activity. b. The permittee shall submit a closure plan for review and approval to the Municipal Permits Team, Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division, for any closure activity at least 90 days prior to conducting such activity. Closure is the act of permanently taking a waste management unit or treatment facility out of service and includes the permanent removal from service of any pit, tank, pond, lagoon, surface impoundment and /or other treatment unit regulated by this permit. 4. The permittee is responsible for installing prior to plant start -up, and subsequently maintaining, adequate safeguards to prevent the discharge of untreated or inadequately treated wastes during electrical power failures by means of alternate power sources, standby generators, and /or retention of inadequately treated wastewater. Page 13 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 5. Unless otherwise specified, the permittee shall provide a readily accessible sampling point and, where applicable, an effluent flow measuring device or other acceptable means by which effluent flow may be determined. 6. The permittee shall remit an annual water quality fee to the Commission as required by 30 TAC Chapter 21. Failure to pay the fee may result in revocation of this permit under TWC § 7.302(b)(6). 7. Documentation For all written notifications to the Commission required of the permittee by this permit, the permittee shall keep and make available a copy of each such notification under the same conditions as self- monitoring data are required to be kept and made available. Except for information required for TPDES permit applications, effluent data, including effluent data in permits, draft permits and permit applications, and other information specified as not confidential in 3o TAC H 1.5(d), any information submitted pursuant to this permit may be claimed as confidential by the submitter. Any such claim must be asserted in the manner prescribed in the application form or by stamping the words confidential business information on each page containing such information. If no claim is made at the time of submission, information may be made available to the public without further notice. If the Commission or Executive Director agrees with the designation of confidentiality, the TCEQ will not provide the information for public inspection unless required by the Texas Attorney General or a court pursuant to an open records request. If the Executive Director does not agree with the designation of confidentiality, the person submitting the information will be notified. 8. Facilities that generate domestic wastewater shall comply with the following provisions; domestic wastewater treatment facilities at permitted industrial sites are excluded. a. Whenever flow measurements for any domestic sewage treatment facility reach 75% of the permitted daily average or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee must initiate engineering and financial planning for expansion and /or upgrading of the domestic wastewater treatment and /or collection facilities. Whenever the flow reaches 9o% of the permitted daily average or annual average flow for three consecutive months, the permittee shall obtain necessary authorization from the Commission to commence construction of the necessary additional treatment and /or collection facilities. In the case of a domestic wastewater treatment facility which reaches 75% of the permitted daily average or annual average flow for three consecutive months, and the planned population to be served or the quantity of waste produced is not expected to exceed the design limitations of the treatment facility, the permittee shall submit an engineering report supporting this claim to the Executive Director of the Commission. If in the judgment of the Executive Director the population to be served will not cause permit noncompliance, then the requirement of this section may be waived. To be effective, any waiver must be in writing and signed by the Director of the Enforcement Division (MC 169) of the Commission, and such waiver of these requirements will be reviewed upon expiration of the existing permit; however, any such waiver shall not be interpreted as condoning or excusing any violation of any permit parameter. Page 14 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 b. The plans and specifications for domestic sewage collection and treatment works associated with any domestic permit must be approved by the Commission and failure to secure approval before commencing construction of such works or making a discharge is a violation of this permit and each day is an additional violation until approval has been secured. c. Permits for domestic wastewater treatment plants are granted subject to the policy of the Commission to encourage the development of area -wide waste collection, treatment, and disposal systems. The Commission reserves the right to amend any domestic wastewater permit in accordance with applicable procedural requirements to require the system covered by this permit to be integrated into an area -wide system, should such be developed; to require the delivery of the wastes authorized to be collected in, treated by or discharged from said system, to such area -wide system; or to amend this permit in any other particular to effectuate the Commission's policy. Such amendments may be made when the changes required are advisable for water quality control purposes and are feasible on the basis of waste treatment technology, engineering, financial, and related considerations existing at the time the changes are required, exclusive of the loss of investment in or revenues from any then existing or proposed waste collection, treatment or disposal system. 9. Domestic wastewater treatment plants shall be operated and maintained by sewage plant operators holding a valid certificate of competency at the required level as defined in 30 TAC Chapter 30. 10. For Publicly Owned. Treatment Works (POTWs), the 3o -day average (or monthly average) percent removal for BOD and TSS shall not be less than 85 %, unless otherwise authorized by this permit. 11. Facilities that generate industrial solid waste as defined in 3o TAC § 335.1 shall comply with these provisions: a. Any solid waste, as defined in 3o TAC § 335.1 (including but not limited to such wastes as garbage, refuse, sludge from a waste treatment, water supply treatment plant or air pollution control facility, discarded materials, discarded materials to be recycled, whether the waste is solid, liquid, or semisolid), generated by the permittee during the management and treatment of wastewater, must be managed in accordance with all applicable provisions of 3o TAC Chapter 335, relating to Industrial Solid Waste Management. b. Industrial wastewater that is being collected, accumulated, stored, or processed before discharge through any final discharge outfall, specified by this permit, is considered to be industrial solid waste until the wastewater passes through the actual point source discharge and must be managed in accordance with all applicable provisions of 3o TAC Chapter 335• c. The permittee shall provide written notification, pursuant to the requirements of 3o TAC § 335.8(b)(1), to the Environmental Cleanup Section (MC 127) of the Remediation Division informing the Commission of any closure activity involving an Industrial Solid Waste Management Unit, at least 90 days prior to conducting such an activity. Page 15 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0 0 153 710 01 d. Construction of any industrial solid waste management unit requires the prior written notification of the proposed activity to the Registration and Reporting Section (MC 129) of the Registration, Review, and Reporting Division. No person shall dispose of industrial solid waste, including sludge or other solids from wastewater treatment processes, prior to fulfilling the deed recordation requirements of 3o TAC § 335.5. e. The term "industrial solid waste management unit' means a landfill, surface impoundment, waste -pile, industrial furnace, incinerator, cement kiln, injection well, container, drum, salt dome waste containment cavern, or any other structure vessel, appurtenance, or other improvement on land used to manage industrial solid waste. f. The permittee shall keep management records for all sludge (or other waste) removed from any wastewater treatment process. These records shall fulfill all applicable requirements of 3o TAC § 335 and must include the following, as it pertains to wastewater treatment and discharge: i. Volume of waste and date(s) generated from treatment process; ii. Volume of waste disposed of on -site or shipped off -site; iii. Date(s) of disposal; iv. Identity of hauler or transporter; v. Location of disposal site; and vi. Method of final disposal. The above records shall be maintained on a monthly basis. The records shall be retained at the facility site, or shall be readily available for review by authorized representatives of the TCEQ for at least five years. 12. For industrial facilities to which the requirements of 3o TAC § 335 do not apply, sludge and solid wastes, including tank cleaning and contaminated solids for disposal, shall be disposed of in accordance with THSC § 361. TCEQ Revision o8 /2oo8 Page 16 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 SLUDGE PROVISIONS The permittee is authorized to dispose of sludge only at a Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) authorized land application site or co- disposal landfill. The disposal of sludge by land application on property owned, leased or under the direct control of the permittee is a violation of the permit unless the site is authorized with the TCEQ. This provision does not authorize Distribution and Marketing of sludge. This provision does not authorize land application of Class A or Class AB Sewage Sludge. This provision does not authorize the permittee to land apply sludge on property owned, leased or under the direct control of the permittee. SECTION I. REQUIREMENTS APPLYING TO ALL SEWAGE SLUDGE LAND APPLICATION A. General Requirements 1. The permittee shall handle and dispose of sewage sludge in accordance with 3o TAC § 312 and all other applicable state and federal regulations in a manner that protects public health and the environment from any reasonably anticipated adverse effects due to any toxic pollutants that may be present in the sludge. 2. In all cases, if the person (permit holder) who prepares the sewage sludge supplies the sewage sludge to another person for land application use or to the owner or lease holder of the land, the permit holder shall provide necessary information to the parties who receive the sludge to assure compliance with these regulations. 3. The permittee shall give 18o days prior notice to the Executive Director in care of the Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division of any change planned in the sewage sludge disposal practice. B. Testing Requirements 1. Sewage sludge shall be tested once during the term of this permit in accordance with the method specified in both 40 CFR Part 261, Appendix II and 40 CFR Part 268, Appendix I LToxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP)] or other method that receives the prior approval of the TCEQ for the contaminants listed in 40 CFR Part 261.24, Table 1. Sewage sludge failing this test shall be managed according to RCRA standards for generators of hazardous waste, and the waste's disposition must be in accordance with all applicable requirements for hazardous waste processing, storage, or disposal. Following failure of any TCLP test, the management or disposal of sewage sludge at a facility other than an authorized hazardous waste processing, storage, or disposal facility shall be prohibited until such time as the permittee can demonstrate the sewage sludge no longer exhibits the hazardous waste toxicity characteristics (as demonstrated by the results of the TCLP tests). A written report shall be provided to both the TCEQ Registration and Reporting Section (MC 129) of the Permitting and Remediation Support Division and the Regional Director (MC Region 13) within seven (7) days after failing the TCLP Test. Page 17 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 The report shall contain test results, certification that unauthorized waste management has stopped and a summary of alternative disposal plans that comply with RCRA standards for the management of hazardous waste. The report shall be addressed to: Director, Registration, Review, and Reporting Division (MC 129), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 13087, Austin, Texas 78711-3087. In addition, the permittee shall prepare an annual report on the results of all sludge toxicity testing. This annual report shall be submitted to the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and the Water Quality Compliance Monitoring Team (MC 224) of the Enforcement Division by September 30th of each year. 2. Sewage sludge shall not be applied to the land if the concentration of the pollutants exceeds the pollutant concentration criteria in Table 1. The frequency of testing for pollutants in Table 1 is found in Section I.C. TABLE 1 Pollutant Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel PCBs Selenium Zinc " Dry weight basis 3. Pathogen Control Ceiline Concentration (Milligrams per kilogram)* 75 85 3000 4300 840 57 75 420 49 100 7500 All sewage sludge that is applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact site, or a reclamation site must be treated by one of the following methods to ensure that the sludge meets either the Class A, Class AB or Class B pathogen requirements. a. For sewage sludge to be classified as Class A with respect to pathogens, the density of fecal coliform in the sewage sludge be less than 1,00o most probable number (MPN) per gram of total solids (dry weight basis), or the density of Salmonella sp. bacteria in the sewage sludge be less than three MPN per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) at the time the sewage sludge is used or disposed. In addition, one of the alternatives listed below must be met. Alternative 1- The temperature of the sewage sludge that is used or disposed shall be maintained at or above a specific value for a period of time. See 3o TAC § 312.82(a)(2)(A) for specific information. Page 18 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 Alternative 5 (PFRP) - Sewage sludge that is used or disposed of must be treated in one of the Processes to Further Reduce Pathogens (PFRP) described in 40 CFR Part 503, Appendix B. PFRP include composting, heat drying, heat treatment, and thermophilic aerobic digestion. Alternative 6 (PFRP Equivalent) - Sewage sludge that is used or disposed of must be treated in a process that has been approved by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency as being equivalent to those in Alternative 5. b. For sewage sludge to be classified as Class AB with respect to pathogens, the density of fecal coliform in the sewage sludge be less than r,000 MPN per gram of total solids (dry weight basis), or the density of Salmonella sp. bacteria in the sewage sludge be less than three MPN per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) at the time the sewage sludge is used or disposed. In addition, one of the alternatives listed below must be met. Alternative 2 - The pH of the sewage sludge that is used or disposed shall be raised to above 12 std. units and shall remain above 12 std. units for 72 hours. The temperature of the sewage sludge shall be above 52° Celsius for 12 hours or longer during the period that the pH of the sewage sludge is above 12 std. units. At the end of the 72 -hour period during which the pH of the sewage sludge is above 12 std. units, the sewage sludge shall be air dried to achieve a percent solids in the sewage sludge greater than 50 %. Alternative 3 - The sewage sludge shall be analyzed for enteric viruses prior to pathogen treatment. The limit for enteric viruses is less than one Plaque- forming Unit per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) either before or following pathogen treatment. See 3o TAC § 312.82(a)(2)(C)(i -iii) for specific information. The sewage sludge shall be analyzed for viable helminth ova prior to pathogen treatment. The limit for viable helminth ova is less than one per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) either before or following pathogen treatment. See 3o TAC § 312.82(a)(2)(C)(iv -vi) for specific information. Alternative 4 -The density of enteric viruses in the sewage sludge shall be less than one Plaque- forming Unit per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) at the time the sewage sludge is used or disposed. The density of viable helminth ova in the sewage sludge shall be less than one per four grams of total solids (dry weight basis) at the time the sewage sludge is used or disposed. c. Sewage sludge that meets the requirements of Class AB sewage sludge may be classified a Class A sewage sludge if a variance request is submitted in writing that is supported by substantial documentation demonstrating equivalent methods for reducing odors and written approval is granted by the executive director. The executive director may deny the variance request or revoke that approved variance if it is determined that the variance may potentially endanger human health or the environment, or create nuisance odor conditions. d. Three alternatives are available to demonstrate compliance with Class B criteria for sewage sludge. Page 19 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 Alternative 1 i. A minimum of seven random samples of the sewage sludge shall be collected within 48 hours of the time the sewage sludge is used or disposed of during each monitoring episode for the sewage sludge. ii. The geometric mean of the density of fecal coliform in the samples collected shall be less than either 2,000,000 MPN per gram of total solids (dry weight basis) or 2,000,000 Colony Forming Units per gram of total solids (dry weight basis). Alternative 2 - Sewage sludge that is used or disposed of shall be treated in one of the Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens (PSRP) described in 40 CFR Part 503, Appendix B, so long as all of the following requirements are met by the generator of the sewage sludge. i. Prior to use or disposal, all the sewage sludge must have been generated from a single location, except as provided in paragraph v. below; ii. An independent Texas Licensed Professional Engineer must make a certification to the generator of a sewage sludge that the wastewater treatment facility generating the sewage sludge is designed to achieve one of the PSRP at the permitted design loading of the facility. The certification need only be repeated if the design loading of the facility is increased. The certification shall include a statement indicating the design meets all the applicable standards specified in Appendix B of 40 CFR Part 503; iii. Prior to any off -site transportation or on -site use or disposal of any sewage sludge generated at a wastewater treatment facility, the chief certified operator of the wastewater treatment facility or other responsible official who manages the processes to significantly reduce pathogens at the wastewater treatment facility for the permittee, shall certify that the sewage sludge underwent at least the minimum operational requirements necessary in order to meet one of the PSRP. The acceptable processes and the minimum operational and record keeping requirements shall be in accordance with established U.S. Environmental Protection Agency final guidance; iv. All certification records and operational records describing how the requirements of this paragraph were met shall be kept by the generator for a minimum of three years and be available for inspection by commission staff for review; and v. If the sewage sludge is generated from a mixture of sources, resulting from a person who prepares sewage sludge from more than one wastewater treatment facility, the resulting derived product shall meet one of the PSRP, and shall meet the certification, operation, and record keeping requirements of this paragraph. Alternative 3_- Sewage sludge shall be treated in an equivalent process that has been approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, so long as all of the following requirements are met by the generator of the sewage sludge. i. Prior to use or disposal, all the sewage sludge must have been generated from a single location, except as provided in paragraph v. below; Page 20 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 ii. Prior to any off -site transportation or on -site use or disposal of any sewage sludge generated at a wastewater treatment facility, the chief certified operator of the wastewater treatment facility or other responsible official who manages the processes to significantly reduce pathogens at the wastewater treatment facility for the permittee, shall certify that the sewage sludge underwent at least the minimum operational requirements necessary in order to meet one of the PSRP. The acceptable processes and the minimum operational and record keeping requirements shall be in accordance with established U.S. Environmental Protection Agency final guidance; iii. All certification records and operational records describing how the requirements of this paragraph were met shall be kept by the generator for a minimum of three years and be available for inspection by commission staff for review; iv. The Executive Director will accept from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency a finding of equivalency to the defined PSRP; and v. If the sewage sludge is generated from a mixture of sources resulting from a person who prepares sewage sludge from more than one wastewater treatment facility, the resulting derived product shall meet one of the Processes to Significantly Reduce Pathogens, and shall meet the certification, operation, and record keeping requirements of this paragraph. In addition, the following site restrictions must be met if Class B sludge is land applied: L Food crops with harvested parts that touch the sewage sludge /soil mixture and are totally above the land surface shall not be harvested for 14 months after application of sewage sludge. ii. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for zo months after application of sewage sludge when the sewage sludge remains on the land surface for 4 months or longer prior to incorporation into the soil. iii. Food crops with harvested parts below the surface of the land shall not be harvested for 38 months after application of sewage sludge when the sewage sludge remains on the land surface for less than 4 months prior to incorporation into the soil. iv. Food crops, feed crops, and fiber crops shall not be harvested for 3o days after application of sewage sludge. v. Animals shall not be allowed to graze on the land for 3o days after application of sewage sludge. A. Turf grown on land where sewage sludge is applied shall not be harvested for 1 year after application of the sewage sludge when the harvested turf is placed on either land with a high potential for public exposure or a lawn. vii. Public access to land with a high potential for public exposure shall be restricted for 1 year after application of sewage sludge. Page 21 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 viii. Public access to land with a low potential for public exposure shall be restricted for 3o days after application of sewage sludge. ix. Land application of sludge shall be in accordance with the buffer zone requirements found in 3o TAC § 312.44• 4. Vector Attraction Reduction Requirements All bulk sewage sludge that is applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact site, or a reclamation site shall be treated by one of the following Alternatives 1 through 10 for vector attraction reduction. Alternative 1- The mass of volatile solids in the sewage sludge shall be reduced by a minimum of 38 %. Alternative 2 - If Alternative 1 cannot be met for an anaerobically digested sludge, demonstration can be made by digesting a portion of the previously digested sludge anaerobically in the laboratory in a bench -scale unit for 4o additional days at a temperature between 30° and 3'7° Celsius. Volatile solids must be reduced by less than 17% to demonstrate compliance. Alternative If Alternative 1 cannot be met for an aerobically digested sludge, demonstration can be made by digesting a portion of the previously digested sludge with percent solids of two percent or less aerobically in the laboratory in a bench -scale unit for 3o additional days at 20° Celsius. Volatile solids must be reduced by less than 15% to demonstrate compliance. Alternative 4 - The specific oxygen uptake rate (SOUR) for sewage sludge treated in an aerobic process shall be equal to or less than 1.5 milligrams of oxygen per hour per gram of total solids (dry weight basis) at a temperature of 20° Celsius. Alternatives - Sewage sludge shall be treated in an aerobic process for 14 days or longer. During that time, the temperature of the sewage sludge shall be higher than 40° Celsius and the average temperature of the sewage sludge shall be higher than 45° Celsius. Alternative 6 - The pH of sewage sludge shall be raised to 12 or higher by alkali addition and, without the addition of more alkali shall remain at 12 or higher for two hours and then remain at a pH of 11.5 or higher for an additional 22 hours at the time the sewage sludge is prepared for sale or given away in a bag or other container. Alternative 7 - The percent solids of sewage sludge that does not contain unstabilized solids generated in a primary wastewater treatment process shall be equal to or greater than 75% based on the moisture content and total solids prior to mixing with other materials. Unstabilized solids are defined as organic materials in sewage sludge that have not been treated in either an aerobic or anaerobic treatment process. Page 22 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creels Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 Alternative 8 - The percent solids of sewage sludge that contains unstabilized solids generated in a primary wastewater treatment process shall be equal to or greater than go% based on the moisture content and total solids prior to mixing with other materials at the time the sludge is used. Unstabilized solids are defined as organic materials in sewage sludge that have not been treated in either an aerobic or anaerobic treatment process. Alternative Q - i. Sewage sludge shall be injected below the surface of the land. ii. No significant amount of the sewage sludge shall be present on the land surface within one hour after the sewage sludge is injected. iii. When sewage sludge that is injected below the surface of the land is Class A or Class AB with respect to pathogens, the sewage sludge shall be injected below the land surface within eight hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process. Alternative io- i. Sewage sludge applied to the land surface or placed on a surface disposal site shall be incorporated into the soil within six hours after application to or placement on the land. ii. When sewage sludge that is incorporated into the soil is Class A or Class AB with respect to pathogens, the sewage sludge shall be applied to or placed on the land within eight hours after being discharged from the pathogen treatment process. C. Monitoring Requirements Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) Test PCBs - once during the term of this permit - once during the term of this permit All metal constituents and fecal coliform or Salmonella sp. bacteria shall be monitored at the appropriate frequency shown below, pursuant to 3o TAC § 312.46(a)(1): Amount of sewage sludge ( *) metric tons Der q6.r;-dav Deriod o to less than 290 290 to less than 1,500 1,500 to less than 15,000 15,000 or greater Monitoring Freouenev Once /Year Once /Quarter Once /Two Months Once /Month ( *) The amount of bulk sewage sludge applied to the land (dry wt. basis). Representative samples of sewage sludge shall be collected and analyzed in accordance with the methods referenced in 3o TAC § 312.7 Page 23 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 SECTION II. REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIC TO BULK SEWAGE SLUDGE FOR APPLICATION TO THE LAND MEETING CLASS A, CLASS AB or B PATHOGEN REDUCTION AND THE CUMULATIVE LOADING RATES IN TABLE 2, OR CLASS B PATHOGEN REDUCTION AND THE POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS IN TABLE 3 For those permittees meeting Class A, Class AB or B pathogen reduction requirements and that meet the cumulative loading rates in Table 2 below, or the Class B pathogen reduction requirements and contain concentrations of pollutants below listed in Table 3, the following conditions apply: A. Pollutant Limits Table 2 Pollutant Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Table 3 Pollutant Arsenic Cadmium Chromium Copper Lead Mercury Molybdenum Nickel Selenium Zinc Cumulative Pollutant Loading Rate (pounds per acre)* 36 35 2677 1339 268 15 Report Only 375 89 2500 Monthly Average Concentration (milligrams per kilogram)* *Dry weight basis B. Pathogen Control 41 39 1200 1500 300 17 Report Only 420 36 2800 All bulk sewage sludge that is applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact site, a reclamation site, shall be treated by either Class A, Class AB or Class B pathogen reduction requirements as defined above in Section I.B.3. Page 24 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 C. Management Practices 1. Bulk sewage sludge shall not be applied to agricultural land, forest, a public contact site, or a reclamation site that is flooded, frozen, or snow- covered so that the bulk sewage sludge enters a wetland or other waters in the State. 2. Bulk sewage sludge not meeting Class A requirements shall be land applied in a manner which complies with Applicability in accordance with 3o TAC § 312.41 and the Management Requirements in accordance with 3o TAC § 312.44• 3. Bulk sewage sludge shall be applied at or below the agronomic rate of the cover crop. 4. An information sheet shall be provided to the person who receives bulk sewage sludge sold or given away. The information sheet shall contain the following information: a. The name and address of the person who prepared the sewage sludge that is sold or given away in a bag or other container for application to the land. b. A statement that application of the sewage sludge to the land is prohibited except in accordance with the instruction on the label or information sheet. c. The annual whole sludge application rate for the sewage sludge application rate for the sewage sludge that does not cause any of the cumulative pollutant loading rates in Table 2 above to be exceeded, unless the pollutant concentrations in Table 3 found in Section Il above are met. D. Notification Requirements 1. If bulk sewage sludge is applied to land in a State other than Texas, written notice shall be provided prior to the initial land application to the permitting authority for the State in which the bulk sewage sludge is proposed to be applied. The notice shall include: a. The location, by street address, and specific latitude and longitude, of each land application site. b. The approximate time period bulk sewage sludge will be applied to the site. c. The name, address, telephone number, and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit number (if appropriate) for the person who will apply the bulk sewage sludge. 2. The permittee shall give 18o days prior notice to the Executive Director in care of the Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division of any change planned in the sewage sludge disposal practice. E. Record keeping Requirements The sludge documents will be retained at the facility site and /or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative. The person who prepares bulk sewage sludge or a sewage sludge material shall develop the following information and shall retain the information at Page 25 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 the facility site and /or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative for a period of five years. If the permittee supplies the sludge to another person who land applies the sludge, the permittee shall notify the land applier of the requirements for record keeping found in 3o TAC § 312.47 for persons who land apply. 1. The concentration (mg /kg) in the sludge of each pollutant listed in Table 3 above and the applicable pollutant concentration criteria (mg /kg), or the applicable cumulative pollutant loading rate and the applicable cumulative pollutant loading rate limit (lbs /ac) listed in Table 2 above. 2. A description of how the pathogen reduction requirements are met (including site restrictions for Class AB and Class B sludge, if applicable). 3. A description of how the vector attraction reduction requirements are met. 4. A description of how the management practices listed above in Section II.0 are being met. 5. The following certification statement: "I certify, under penalty of law, that the applicable pathogen requirements in 30 TAC § 312.82(a) or (b) and the vector attraction reduction requirements in 3o TAC § 312.83(b) have been met for each site on which bulk sewage sludge is applied. This determination has been made under my direction and supervision in accordance with the system designed to ensure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluate the information used to determine that the management practices have been met. I am aware that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment." 6. The recommended agronomic loading rate from the references listed in Section II.C.3. above, as well as the actual agronomic loading rate shall be retained. The person who applies bulk sewage sludge or a sewage sludge material shall develop the following information and shall retain the information at the facility site and /or shall be readily available for review by a TCEQ representative indefinitely. If the permittee supplies the sludge to another person who land applies the sludge, the permittee shall notify the land applier of the requirements for record keeping found in 3o TAC § 312.47 for persons who land apply: a. A certification statement that all applicable requirements (specifically listed) have been met, and that the permittee understands that there are significant penalties for false certification including fine and imprisonment. See 3o TAC § 312.47(a)(4)(A)(ii) or 3o TAC § 312.47(a)(5)(A)(E), as applicable, and to the permittee's specific sludge treatment activities. b. The location, by street address, and specific latitude and longitude, of each site on which sludge is applied. c. The number of acres in each site on which bulk sludge is applied. d. The date and time sludge is applied to each site. Page 26 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0 0 158710 0 1 e. The cumulative amount of each pollutant in pounds /acre listed in Table 2 applied to each site. f. The total amount of sludge applied to each site in dry tons. The above records shall be maintained on -site on a monthly basis and shall be made available to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality upon request. F. Reporting Requirements The permittee shall report annually to the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and Water Quality Compliance Monitoring Team (MC 224) of the Enforcement Division, by September 3oth of each year the following information: 1. Results of tests performed for pollutants found in either Table 2 or 3 as appropriate for the permittee's land application practices. 2. The frequency of monitoring listed in Section LC. that applies to the permittee. 3. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results. 4. Identity of hauler(s) and TCEQ transporter number. 5. PCB concentration in sludge in mg /kg. 6. Date(s) of disposal. 7. Owner of disposal site(s). 8. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality registration number, if applicable. g. Amount of sludge disposal dry weight (lbs /acre) at each disposal site. 1o. The concentration (mg /kg) in the sludge of each pollutant listed in Table 1(defined as a monthly average) as well as the applicable pollutant concentration criteria (mg /kg) listed in Table 3 above, or the applicable pollutant loading rate limit (lbs /acre) listed in Table 2 above if it exceeds go% of the limit. 11. Level of pathogen reduction achieved (Class A, Class AB or Class B). 12. Alternative used as listed in Section I.B.3.(a. or b.). Alternatives describe how the pathogen reduction requirements are met. If Class B sludge, include information on how site restrictions were met. 13. Vector attraction reduction alternative used as listed in Section I.B.4. 14. Annual sludge production in dry tons /year. 15. Amount of sludge land applied in dry tons /year. 16. The certification statement listed in either 3o TAC § 312.47(a)(4)(A)(ii) or 30 TAC § 312.47(a)(5)(A)(ii) as applicable to the permittee's sludge treatment activities, shall be attached to the annual reporting form. Page 27 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 17. When the amount of any pollutant applied to the land exceeds go% of the cumulative pollutant loading rate for that pollutant, as described in Table 2, the permittee shall report the following information as an attachment to the annual reporting form. a. The location, by street address, and specific latitude and longitude. b. The number of acres in each site on which bulk sewage sludge is applied. c. The date and time bulk sewage sludge is applied to each site. I The cumulative amount of each pollutant (i.e., pounds /acre) listed in Table 2 in the bulk sewage sludge applied to each site. e. The amount of sewage sludge (i.e., dry tons) applied to each site. The above records shall be maintained on a monthly basis and shall be made available to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality upon request. Page 28 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 SECTION III. REQUIREMENTS APPLYING TO ALL SEWAGE SLUDGE DISPOSED IN A MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL A. The permittee shall handle and dispose of sewage sludge in accordance with 3o TAC § 330 and all other applicable state and federal regulations to protect public health and the environment from any reasonably anticipated adverse effects due to any toxic pollutants that may be present. The permittee shall ensure that the sewage sludge meets the requirements in 3o TAC § 330 concerning the quality of the sludge disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill. B. If the permittee generates sewage sludge and supplies that sewage sludge to the owner or operator of a municipal solid waste landfill ( MSWLF) for disposal, the permittee shall provide to the owner or operator of the MSWLF appropriate information needed to be in compliance with the provisions of this permit. C. The permittee shall give 18o days prior notice to the Executive Director in care of the Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division of any change planned in the sewage sludge disposal practice. D. Sewage sludge shall be tested once during the term of this permit in accordance with the method specified in both 40 CFR Part 261, Appendix II and 40 CFR Part 268, Appendix I (Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure) or other method, which receives the prior approval of the TCEQ for contaminants listed in Table 1 of 40 CFR § 261.24. Sewage sludge failing this test shall be managed according to RCRA standards for generators of hazardous waste, and the waste's disposition must be in accordance with all applicable requirements for hazardous waste processing, storage, or disposal. Following failure of any TCLP test, the management or disposal of sewage sludge at a facility other than an authorized hazardous waste processing, storage, or disposal facility shall be prohibited until such time as the permittee can demonstrate the sewage sludge no longer exhibits the hazardous waste toxicity characteristics (as demonstrated by the results of the TCLP tests). A written report shall be provided to both the TCEQ Registration and Reporting Section (MC 129) of the Permitting and Remediation Support Division and the Regional Director (MC Region 13) of the appropriate TCEQ field office within '7 days after failing the TCLP Test. The report shall contain test results, certification that unauthorized waste management has stopped and a summary of alternative disposal plans that comply with RCRA standards for the management of hazardous waste. The report shall be addressed to: Director, Registration, Review, and Reporting Division (MC 129), Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, P. O. Box 13o87, Austin, Texas 7 8711 - 3087. In addition, the permittee shall prepare an annual report on the results of all sludge toxicity testing. This annual report shall be submitted to the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and the Water Quality Compliance Monitoring Team (MC 224) of the Enforcement Division by September 30 of each year. E. Sewage sludge shall be tested as needed, in accordance with the requirements of 30 TAC Chapter 330. F. Record keeping Requirements The permittee shall develop the following information and shall retain the information for five years. Page 29 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 1. The description (including procedures followed and the results) of all liquid Paint Filter Tests performed. 2. The description (including procedures followed and results) of all TCLP tests performed. The above records shall be maintained on -site on a monthly basis and shall be made available to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality upon request. G. Reporting Requirements The permittee shall report annually to the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and Water Quality Compliance Monitoring Team (MC 224) of the Enforcement Division by September 30th of each year the following information: 1. Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results. 2. Annual sludge production in dry tons /year. 3. Amount of sludge disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill in dry tons /year. 4. Amount of sludge transported interstate in dry tons /year. 5. A certification that the sewage sludge meets the requirements of 3o TAC § 330 concerning the quality of the sludge disposed in a municipal solid waste landfill. 6. Identity of hauler(s) and transporter registration number. 7. Owner of disposal site(s). 8. Location of disposal site(s). g. Date(s) of disposal. The above records shall be maintained on -site on a monthly basis and shall be made available to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality upon request. Page 30 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W00015371001 SECTION IV. REQUIREMENTS APPLYING TO SLUDGE TRANSPORTED TO ANOTHER FACILITY FOR FURTHER PROCESSING These provisions apply to sludge that is transported to another wastewater treatment facility or facility that further processes sludge. These provisions are intended to allow transport of sludge to facilities that have been authorized to accept sludge. These provisions do not limit the ability of the receiving facility to determine whether to accept the sludge, nor do they limit the ability of the receiving facility to request additional testing or documentation. A. General Requirements 1. The permittee shall handle and dispose of sewage sludge in accordance with 3o TAC Chapter 312 and all other applicable state and federal regulations in a manner that protects public health and the environment from any reasonably anticipated adverse effects due to any toxic pollutants that may be present in the sludge. 2. Sludge may only be transported using a registered transporter or using an approved pipeline. B. Record Keeping Requirements 1. For sludge transported by an approved pipeline, the permittee must maintain records of the following: a. the amount of sludge transported; b. the date of transport; C. the name and TCEQ permit number of the receiving facility or facilities; d. the location of the receiving facility or facilities; e. the name and TCEQ permit number of the facility that generated the waste; and f. copy of the written agreement between the permittee and the receiving facility to accept sludge. 2. For sludge transported by a registered transporter, the permittee must maintain records of the completed trip tickets in accordance with 3o TAC § 312.145(a)(1) -(7) and amount of sludge transported. 3. The above records shall be maintained on -site on a monthly basis and shall be made available to the TCEQ upon request. These records shall be retained for at least five years. Page 31 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 C. Reporting Requirements The permittee shall report the following information annually to the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and Water Quality Compliance Monitoring Team (MC 224) of the Enforcement Division, by September 30th of each year: 1. the annual sludge production; 2. the amount of sludge transported; 3. the owner of each receiving facility; 4. the location of each receiving facility; and 5. the date(s) of disposal at each receiving facility. TCEQ Revision 6/2015 Page 32 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 OTHER REQUIREMENTS 1. The permittee shall employ or contract with one or more licensed wastewater treatment facility operators or wastewater system operations companies holding a valid license or registration according to the requirements of 3o TAC Chapter 30, Occupational Licenses and Registrations, and in particular 3o TAC Chapter 30, Subchapter J, Wastewater Operators and Operations Companies. This Category C facility must be operated by a chief operator or an operator holding a Category C license or higher. The facility must be operated a minimum of five days per week by the licensed chief operator or an operator holding the required level of license or higher. The licensed chief operator or operator holding the required level of license or higher must be available by telephone or pager seven days per week. Where shift operation of the wastewater treatment facility is necessary, each shift that does not have the on -site supervision of the licensed chief operator must be supervised by an operator in charge who is licensed not less than one level below the category for the facility. 2. The facility is not located in the Coastal Management Program boundary. 3. The permittee is hereby placed on notice that this permit may be reviewed by the TCEQ after the completion of any new intensive water quality survey on Segment No. 1902 of the San Antonio River Basin and any subsequent updating of the water quality model for Segment No. 1902 to determine if the limitations and conditions contained herein are consistent with any such revised model. The permit maybe amended, pursuant to 3o TAC § 305.62, as a result of such review. The permittee is also hereby placed on notice that effluent limits may be made more stringent at renewal based on, for example, any change to modeling protocol approved in the TCEQ Continuing Planning Process. 4. The permittee has submitted sufficient evidence of legal restrictions prohibiting residential structures within the part of the buffer zone not owned by the permittee according to 3o TAC § 309.13(e)(3). The permittee shall comply with the requirements of 3o TAC § 309.13 (a) through (d). (See Attachment A.) 5. The permittee shall provide facilities for the protection of its wastewater treatment facility from a loo -year flood. 6. In accordance with 3o TAC § 319.9, a permittee that has at least twelve months of uninterrupted compliance with its bacteria limit may notify the commission in writing of its compliance and request a less frequent measurement schedule. To request a less frequent schedule, the permittee shall submit a written request to the TCEQ Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) for each phase that includes a different monitoring frequency. The request must contain all of the reported bacteria values (Daily Avg. and Daily Max /Single Grab) for the twelve consecutive months immediately prior to the request. If the Executive Director finds that a less frequent measurement schedule is protective of human health and the environment, the permittee may be given a less frequent measurement schedule. For this permit, 1 /quarter may be reduced to 1 /six months in the Interim and Final phases. A violation of any bacteria limit by a facility that has been granted a less frequent measurement schedule will require the permittee to return to the standard frequency schedule and submit written notice to the TCEQ Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148). The permittee may not apply for another reduction in measurement frequency for at least 24 months from the date of the last violation. The Executive Director may establish a more frequent measurement schedule if necessary to protect human health or the environment. 7. Within 90 days of issuance of the permit for the Interim phase and prior to construction of the Final phase treatment facility, the permittee shall submit to the TCEQ Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) a summary submittal letter in accordance with the requirements in 3o TAC Section 217.6(c). If requested by the Wastewater Permitting Section, the permittee shall submit plans and specifications Page 33 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. WQ0015371001 and a final engineering design report which comply with 3o TAC Chapter 217, Design Criteria for Domestic Wastewater Systems. The permittee shall clearly show how the treatment system will meet the final permitted effluent limitations required on Pages 2 and 2a of this permit. 8. The permittee shall notify the TCEQ Regional Office (MC Region 13) and the Applications Review and Processing Team (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division, in writing at least forty -five (45) days prior to the completion of the Final phase facilities on Notification of Completion Form 20007. Page 34 City of Schertz and Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority TPDES Permit No. W0 0 0153 710 01 CONTRIBUTING INDUSTRIES AND PRETREATMENT REQUIREMENTS i. The following pollutants may not be introduced into the treatment facility: a. Pollutants which create a fire or explosion hazard in the publicly owned treatment works (POTW), including, but not limited to, waste streams with a closed cup flashpoint of less than 14o degrees Fahrenheit (6o degrees Celsius) using the test methods specified in 40 CFR § 261.21; b. Pollutants which will cause corrosive structural damage to the POTW, but in no case shall there be discharges with a pH lower than 5.0 standard units unless the works are specifically designed to accommodate such discharges; c. Solid or viscous pollutants in amounts which will cause obstruction to the flow in the POTW, resulting in Interference; d. Any pollutant, including oxygen demanding pollutants (e.g., BOD), released in a discharge at a flow rate and /or pollutant concentration which will cause Interference with the POTW; e. Heat in amounts which will inhibit biological activity in the POTW, resulting in Interference, but in no case shall there be heat in such quantities that the temperature at the POTW treatment plant exceeds 104 degrees Fahrenheit (4o degrees Celsius) unless the Executive Director, upon request of the POTW, approves alternate temperature limits; f. Petroleum oil, non - biodegradable cutting oil, or products of mineral oil origin in amounts that will cause Interference or Pass Through; g. Pollutants which result in the presence of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes within the POTW in a quantity that may cause acute worker health and safety problems; and h. Any trucked or hauled pollutants except at discharge points designated by the POTW. 2. The permittee shall require any indirect discharger to the treatment works to comply with the reporting requirements of Sections 204(b), 307, and 3o8 of the Clean Water Act, including any requirements established under 40 CFR Part 403 [rev. Federal Register/ Vol. 7o/No.198/ Friday, October 14, 2oog /Rules and Regulations, pages 60184- 6o798]. 3. The permittee shall provide adequate notification to the Executive Director, care of the Wastewater Permitting Section (MC 148) of the Water Quality Division, within 3o days subsequent to the permittee's knowledge of either of the following: a. Any new introduction of pollutants into the treatment works from an indirect discharger which would be subject to Sections 3o1 and 3o6 of the Clean Water Act if it were directly discharging those pollutants; and b. Any substantial change in the volume or character of pollutants being introduced into the treatment works by a source introducing pollutants into the treatment works at the time of issuance of the permit. Any notice shall include information on the quality and quantity of effluent to be introduced into the treatment works and any anticipated impact of the change on the quality or quantity of effluent to be discharged from the POTW. Revised July 2007 Page 35 t 3 LEROY AND MARTHA SCHWAB WOMPN µ0 LL6R1NG GREEK -.00 OUTFALL 001 CITY OF SCHER TZ / e 1.0. e\ LEGEND INTERIM PHASE FINAL PHASE � \O ERIC L. MOORE ATTACHMENT A FEET 0 100 FACILITY BOUNDARY APPLICANT'S PROPERTY BOUNDARY 150' BUFFER ZONE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY AND CITMYFa IN Z WOMAN HOLLERING TREATMENT PLANT APPLICATION FOR NEW TPDES PERMIT u BUFFER ZONE MAP Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT B CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY ALTERNATIVE 1 — Parallel Package Plant at Existing Site COST ESTIMATE Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank Alternative No 1 Parallel Package Plant at Existing Site Equipment / Material Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Site Work Roadway Improvements 244.44 SY $ 36 $ 8,800 Sidewalk 231 SF $ 4.25 $ 982 Junction Box No. 1 1 Each $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Junction Box No. 2 1 Each $ 3,000 $ 3,000 Yard Piping 8" PVC; Junction Box (1) to Package Plant 75 LF $ 13.65 $ 1,024 8" PVC; Package Plant to Junction Box (2) 100 LF $ 13.65 $ 1,365 0.042 Package Plant Installation 1 Each $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Excavation 26 CY $ 7.50 $ 195 Crushed Rock Pad 26 CY $ 37.75 $ 982 Subtotal - $ 79,348 Electrical & Instrumentation 15% $ 11,902 Contractor Overhead, Insurance, Bonds, Profit 35% $ 27,772 Contingencies 30% $ 23,804 Engineering/Survey $ 17,000 Construction Total - - $ 159,826 Package Plant Monthly Rental Fee 24 Month $ 10,400 $ 249,600 Operation & Maintenance (2 Years) Manhours 1,460 hrs/yr 35 $ 102,200 12 YEAR PROJECT TOTAL $ 511,700 Attachment B Page 1 Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank ATTACHMENT C CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY ALTERNATIVE 2 — Haul Wastewater from Existing Site to Another Treatment Plant COST ESTIMATE Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank Alternative No 2 Haul Wastewater from Existing Site to Another Treatment Plant Equipment / Material Description Quantity Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Construction Woman Hollering Access Improvements Backfill 2,002 CY $ 14 $ 28,000 Paving - heavy duty 2,002 SY $ 36 $ 72,100 Fill under pavement 667 CY $ 50 $ 33,400 Engineering /Survey $ 12,000 Hauling to CCMA OJR Volume of Wastewater 5,500 Gallons Distance Travelled by Truck 5 Miles Frequency of Deliveries 1,200 EA $ 450 $ 540,000 Operation & Maintenance 2 Years Manhours 730 hours /yr $ 35 $ 51,100 2 YEAR PROJECT TOTAL $ 736,600 Attachment C Page 1 Woman Hollering Treatment Plant Evaluation Alternatives to Treat Increasing Flows This page intentionally left blank CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 13, 2016 Department: Drainage /Finance Agenda No. 3 Subject: Ordinance No. 16- T40 — An Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas authorizing a budget adjustment to fund the demolition and replacement of the bridge at Lower Seguin Rd at Cibolo Creek. (First reading) BACKGROUND In June, 2016 it was discovered that the low water crossing on Lower Seguin Road where it crosses the Cibolo Creek was structurally unsound. This low water crossing is at the city limits of Cibolo and Schertz and is at the Bexar and Guadalupe County Lines. The crossing closed on June 28 and work began on alternatives to replace this low water crossing. After two meetings with the City of Cibolo, Guadalupe County and Bexar County representatives, it has been agreed that the most cost effective solution is to replace the current structure with a new structure constructed of 2 4'X3' drainage boxes. This project will provide improvements to the low water crossing by increasing the water flow capacity from 105 cfs to 155 cfs and increase the roadway width from approximately sixteen feet to twenty two feet. This will increase the safety of the traveling public as they meet each other at the crossing. Although not a tremendous improvement in flow, this new structure will result in fewer closures of this low water crossing. Due to the usage of this crossing by commuters on a daily basis from both Cities as well as a route for SCUCISD students and staff to reach Corbett Junior High both Cities are taking on the commitment to replace this crossing. Both counties have made a verbal commitment to assist with this replacement; however, those written agreements are still in negotiations. The estimated cost of replacement is $440,000 and both Schertz and Cibolo will share this equally. Any other support from our county partners will equally reduce the total of which each City is responsible. Prior to entering into an inter -local agreement a budget adjustment must be accomplished by ordinance. FISCAL IMPACT The expected total cost of the project is approximately $440,000. The final design and construction costs is unknown until the project is bid. As a result, Staff is recommending a 10% contingency be included with this budget adjustment for an overall total of $484,000. This project will be funded from the Schertz Drainage Fund Balance that has a $939,271 balance as of September 30, 2016. No fee increase or change in the FY 2016 -1.7 Operating Budget will be necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve the budget adjustment of $484,000.00 for the funding of the Lower Seguin Rd. Bridge project, Ordinance No. 16 -T -40 on first reading. The City Council Memorandum Page 2 City will be taking the lead on this project with Cibolo and any other partners reimbursing the City for costs expended per inter local agreements currently under negotiation. Attachments Ordinance 16 -T -40 ORDINANCE NO. 16 -T -40 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A BUDGET ADJUSTMENT TO FUND THE DEMOLITION AND REPLACEMENT OF THE BRIDGE AT LOWER SEGUIN ROAD AND CIBOLO CREEK; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 16 -T -29, the City of Schertz (the "City ") adopted the budget for the City for the fiscal year 201.6 -2017 (the `Budget), which provides funding for the City's operations throughout the 2016 -2017 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City needs to increase the Budget to authorize expenditures of $484,000 for the funding of the demolition and replacement of the bridge on Lower Seguin Road at the Cibolo Creek in the Drainage Fund; and WHEREAS, the City needs to increase revenue to recognize Cibolo's contribution toward this project as laid out in the Interlocal agreement of $242,000; and WHEREAS, the City needs to authorize use of the Drainage Fund Balance in the amount of $242,000 to fund the project; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends that the City Council of the City adjust the Budget and approve the additional revenue and expense for the project; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to adjust the Budget and approve the budget adjustment for the Drainage Fund for the demolition and replacement of the bridge at Lower Seguin Road, as more fully set forth in this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. The City shall adjust the Budget by $484,000 for the demolition and replacement of the bridge at Lower Seguin Road. Section 2. The City shall recognize the additional $242,000 in revenue from the interlocal agreement with the City of Cibolo to fund this project. Section 3. The City shall recognize the use of $242,000 of the Drainage Fund Balance to fund this project. Section 4. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 5. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 8. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. 50558021.1 - 2 - PASSED ON FIRST READING, the day of , 2016. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED ON SECOND READING, the day of 52016. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50558021.1 - 3 - CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 13, 2016 Department: Finance Agenda No. 4 Subject: Resolution No. 16 -R -90 — Accounts Receivables Adjustments BACKGROUND: In the EMS, Utility Billing, and Magazine functions, services are provided to customers up front and billing is settled later. Due to the fact that services are provided before receiving payment, inevitably the City has customers that do not pay for the services provided. When this occurs, staff reaches out to the customer to try to collect the outstanding payment including follow up notices and phone calls to try and reach out to the customer to remind them of the outstanding balance and encourage payment. However, the longer the customer account goes without a payment the less likely that any payment will be received. Once a customer account reaches 180 days without payment, Staff brings those accounts to the City Council to be "written off'. This process is an accounting procedure following the Generally Accepted Accounted Principles (GAAP), which lays the framework of accounting practices in the U.S. This designation means it is unlikely those outstanding balances will ever be collected. This leads to an accounting adjustment on the City's Financial Statements to accurately show how much is still outstanding and is reasonable to expect collection. If a customer's account has been written off, this does not erase or forgive that debt. The city can and does collect some portion of the amount owed by those customers. This can be through the debt collection agency used by EMS or if the customer returns to the City and requests new services through the Magazine or Utility Billing. Staff is in the process of exploring best practices to that can lead to lower write offs going forward. The resolution authorizes the debt for these areas that is more than 180 days outstanding as of November 30, 2016 to be written off. These write offs come before council quarterly and last came before council on July 26", 2016. FISCAL IMPACT This accounting adjustment will not affect the City's Budget or financial standing. The amount written off is estimated during the budget process and is accounted for in the revenue estimations and the bad debt expense accounts. The action taken tonight will reduce the amount shown as owed to the City by $1,013,972.89 and set it equal to the amount seen as still reasonably collectible. The breakdown is as follows: EMS - $979,547.74 Utility Billing - $28,625.15 City Council Memorandum Page 2 Magazine - $5,800.00 RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 16 -R -90 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 16 -R -90 Memo - Resolution.doc RESOLUTION NO. 16 -R -90 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING EMS DEBT REVENUE ADJUSTMENTS FOR INACTIVE OUTSTANDING ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLES AFTER 180 DAYS OF NON PAYMENT AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City maintains quarterly debt revenue adjustments for inactive outstanding accounts; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City that all inactive outstanding accounts after 180 days nonpayment will be sent to City Council for consideration for write offs attached hereto as Exhibit A. (the "Account Receivable Adjustment Register "). BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the write off in the amount and distribution of accounts below: Function I Amount EMS $979,547.74 Utility Billing $28,625.1.5 Magazine $5,800.00 Total $1,013,972.89 Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and finding of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of December, 2016. . CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor Michael R. Carpenter ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) Agenda No. 5 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 13, 2016 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Resolution No. 16 -R -92 - Conduct a public hearing for consideration and /or action on a resolution accepting a petition by Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority, for voluntary annexation of approximately 63 acres of land, generally located on Trainer Hale Road, approximately 600 feet north of I -10, specifically located at 7424 Trainer Hale Road, Bexar County, Texas. BACKGROUND In 2010 the City of San Antonio released 3,486 acres of its Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) to the City of Schertz. City Council accepted the area into the City of Schertz ETJ and started the annexation proceedings. The annexation proceedings that followed in 2011 were involuntary annexations that required the City go through specific proceedings involving notification requirements and public hearings in order to annex the properties into the City corporate limits. As part of the annexation proceedings a majority of the parcels located within the released area signed delayed annexation development agreements with the City in accordance with Texas Local. Government Code (LGC) Section 43.035 and 212.1.72. The subject property has an executed delayed annexation development agreement with the City of Schertz. Annexation of land into the City's corporate limits may be voluntary or involuntary. Each type has LGC requirements that identifies the necessary process based on the annexation type. The City's Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 21.4.8 includes provisions that apply to requests for voluntary annexation meeting certain criteria. This section of the City's UDC includes provisions for processing of voluntary annexation requests. Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) has submitted a petition for voluntary annexation to the City of Schertz for an approximate 63 acre tract of land. The subject property is Located approximately 600 feet north of I -10 and is located in Bexar County Texas, at 7424 Trainer Hale Road. Currently, the subject property is in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Schertz and within the Schertz - Cibolo- Universal Independent School District boundaries. Due to the petition for voluntary annexation meeting criteria outlined in LGC Section 43.028, certain elements of UDC Section 21.4.8 do not apply. For example, UDC Section 21.4.8.C.4 requires an annexation service plan. However, voluntary annexations that are subject to LGC Section City Council Memorandum Page 2 43.028 do not require an annexation service plan for solely the subject property being annexed. CCMA requested annexation of the adjacent property to the north (approximately 69 acres at 7720 Trainer Hale Rd.), which was annexed in 2015 by Ordinance 15 -A -01. CCMA is planning on constructing a waste water treatment plant on the southern tract that is the subject site of the current petition for voluntary annexation and use most of the northern tract that was annexed in 2015 as a natural buffer. Upon. City Council accepting CCMA's current petition for voluntary annexation of the approximate 63 acres, it would initiate the process to annex and zone the property. The adoption of this resolution accepting the petition for annexation from CCMA does not annex the subject property, but allows for City Council to annex the property by ordinance in the future. A subsequent ordinance for annexation must be approved by City Council to annex the property. CCMA has also requested to zone the subject property, upon annexation, Public Use District (PUB) which is intended to identify and provide for land owned or may be owned by the City, County, State or Federal Government or the School District; land that has been dedicated to the City for public use such as parks and recreation, and land designated and dedicated to the City as a greenbelt. A courtesy public hearing notice was published in "The Daily Commercial Recorder" on December 9, 2016. . Goal Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority is requesting voluntary annexation into the City of Schertz because of their desire to be located within the Schertz city limits. Community Benefit Promote the safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Staff recommends approval of Resolution 16 -R -92 accepting a petition for voluntary annexation. FISCAL IMPACT The approval of Resolution 16 -R -92 accepting a petition for voluntary annexation does not have a financial impact on the City; however, the end annexation of the property will. In accordance with Texas Local Government Code (LGC) Chapter 43, the City must provide services to the land on the effective date of the annexation. While some services are provided to the subject property through interlocal agreement the City of Schertz must provide police protection, fire protection, emergency medical services, operation and maintenance of streets, solid waste collection and sewer service. Water service is provided by Green Valley Special Utility District. [' I 1 • I City Council Memorandum Page 3 Staff recommends approval of Resolution 16 -R -92 accepting a petition for voluntary annexation. ATTACHMENT Resolution 16 -R -92 RESOLUTION NO. 16 -R -92 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ACCEPTING A PETITION FOR VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION WITHIN THE EXTRATERRITORIAL JUSRIDICTION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ WHEREAS, a petition for annexation from Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority for approximately 63 acres of land generally located on Trainer Hale Road 600 feet north of the intersection of Trainer Hale Road and IH -10 and more specifically described in the Exhibit A attached herein (herein, the "Property ") has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code Section 43.028 authorizes the City of Schertz to extend its City limit boundaries through the voluntary annexation of area adjacent to those boundaries upon petition of a landowner; and WHEREAS, the complete petition packet is attached hereto as Exhibit A; and, WHEREAS, the City staff has recommended that the petition for annexation be accepted; and WHEREAS, upon accepting the petition for voluntary annexation of the subject property, the City may annex the property by adoption of an ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Petition for Voluntary Annexation. Section 2. The City Council shall act upon the Petition for Voluntary Annexation and annex the subject property by ordinance at a future meeting of the City Council at such time the City Council deems to be in the best interest of the City. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 4. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 8. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 13th day of December, 2016. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A (VOLUNTARY ANNEXATION PETITION PACKET) P.O. BOX 938 | S[HERTZ,TEXAS 78154 i (2)0) 058-6241 FAX: CZlQ 658-5830 | wwwzcmamurg November 28, 2016 Mr. John Kesse City of Schertz 14OUSchertzParkway Schertz,T%781S4 RE: Annexation of Property Described in Exhibit /,attached Dear Mr. Kessel: This letter isto respectfully request1hat1beChyofSchertz,Texasannexdlesubectpvopertydeschbed in the attached Exhibit A, consisting of 62.940 total acres of property currently owned byObolo Creak Municipal Authority (CCMA). ScheMzdty services are currently being provided to the subject property and itb0NA'sdesire to be located within the Schertz city limits. Please let me know when this request will be considered by the Schertz City Council so that I may attend to answer any questions and provide additional comments, if necessary, in support of this request.. Respectfully submitted, . Clint Ellis General Manager Attachment: Exhibit A EXHIBIT A D*A*MAVUYER .-LAND SURVEYING- METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR A 62.940 ACRE TRACT OF LAND Being 62,940 acres of land out of the E. Gortari Survey No. 2, Abstract No. 5, County Block 5193, Bexar County, Texas, and being all of a 62.139 acre tract of land described in Volume 8434, Page 1819 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Bexar County, Texas, and said 62.940 acres of land being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a Y?" iron pin found on the Northeast right-of-way line of Trainer Hale Road, a Southwesterly comer of a 69.106 acre tract of land as described in Volume 6160, Page 1686 of the Official. Public Records of Real Property of Bexar County, Texas, and being the most Westerly corner of this herein described 62.940 acre tract of land; T14ENCE departing the Northeast right-of-way line of said Trainer Hale Road and with the Southeast line of said ' 69.106 acre tract of land, N 59' 47' 58" E distance of 3090.45 feet to a 1/2" iron pin found on line for a reference point, a total distance of 3239.04 feet to the center of Cibolo Creek for the East comer of said 69.106 acre tract of land and being the Northerly comer of this herein described 62.940 acre tract of land; THENCE with the meanders of Cibolo Creek the following calls and distances: S 16' 43' 50" E a distance of 385.56 feet to a point; S 471 04' 33" E a distance of 140.10 feet to a point; and S 59' 31' 14" E a distance of 424.41 feet to point for the most Northerly comer of a 54.72 acre tract of land as described in Volume 3357, Page 401 of the Official Public Records of Real Property of Bexar County, the Easterly comer of this herein described 62.940 acre tract of land; THENCE departing the center line of Cibolo Creek, and with a fence along the Northwesterly line of said 54.72 acre tract of land, S 620 57' 00" W a distance of 240.92 feet to a Y2" iron pin found for a comer of said 54.72 acre tract of land, and a comer of this herein described 62.940 acre tract of land; THENCE with the Northwesterly line of said 54.72 acre tract of land, the following calls and distances: S 59' 48' 53" W a distance of 669.73 feet to a Y2" iron pin with cap stamped "DAM #5348 PROP. COR." set for a comer; and S 59' 55' 16" W a distance of 2362.65 feet to a V2." iron pin found on the Northeast right-of-way line of said Trainer Hale Road, a Westerly comer of said 54.72 acre tract of land and being the Southwest comer of this herein described 62.940 acre tract of land; IF 2700 Rollina Creek, Sorina Branch. TX 78070 1 T: 210.325.0858 THENCE with the Northeast right-of-way line of Trainer Hale Road, the following calls: N 42' 13' 33" W a distance of 108.20 feet to a'12" iron pin found for a comer and beginning of a curve to the curve to the right; With said curve to the right, having a Radius of 2315.23 feet, an Arc Length of 199.88 feet, a Delta Angle of 04' 56' 47", and a Chord bearing and distance of N 39' 50' 53" W, 199.82 feet to a comer; and N 37' 22' 29" W a distance of 561.79 feet to the PONT OF BEGINNING and containing 62.940 acres of land, more or less; Bearings based on the Texas State Plane Coordinate System, Texas South Central Zone (4204), N.A.D 1993. Surveyed on the ground this the 12" day of May, 2014. ............. Drew A. Mawyer' If.,I VDR� E �YW�A. M, A W Y E R Registered Professional Lid S rveyor No. 5348 8 C�' TBPLS Firm Registration #10 191500 SA—DAM-MLV-2014 Projects\CCM007-ScheeNN4&B\CCM007-62.940 AC- M&B.doc 2 CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING June 2, 2016 1. Call to Order: The special meeting of the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority was called to order at 6:00 p.m. at CCMA's office at 100 Dietz Road, Schertz, TX 2. Roll Call: Present for the meeting was Mr. Ken Greenwald, President; Mr. Richard Braud, Vice - President; Mrs. Reginna Agee, Secretary - Treasurer; Mr. Bobby Greaves, Director and Mr. T. "Jake" Jacobs, Director. Staff present was: Mr. Clint Ellis, General Manager; Ms Christine Budnik, Assistant to the General Manager; Mr. Brandon Bradley, Special Projects Manager; Mr. Ryan Madsen, Business Manager; Mrs. Shirley Taylor, Controller and Mr. Nick Sherman, CCMA Project Manager. 3. Citizens to be Heard: There were no citizens present. 4. Executive Session held in Accordance with: (a) Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Code, for Consultation with Attorney Regarding Pending or Contemplated Litigation /Contract and Procurement Issues and (b) Section 551.072 of the Texas Government Code, to Deliberate the Purchase, Exchange, Lease, or Value of Real Property: Mr. Greenwald called the meeting into closed session at 6:01 p.m. 5. Board Reconvenes into open Session to Authorize the General Manager to take any Action(s) on Discussions in Executive Session (a) and (b): Mr. Greenwald called the meeting back into open session at 6:07 p.m. Item (a): No action taken. Item (b): Mr. Greaves motioned for authorizing the General Manager to procure an additional 15' permanent easement from Mr. Mueller in the amount of $11,000.00. Mrs. Agee seconded and all Directors voted aye. 6. Consideration /Approval of the Minutes from the May 12, 2016 Directors Meeting: Mr. Jacobs motioned for approval of the minutes as written with Mr. Braud seconding and all Directors voting aye. 7. Discussion on Systems Information: In addition to information provided in packets, Mr. Ellis stated Mr. Dabney is working on additional pumping capacity at the Town Creek lift station. With the recent heavy rain events, I & I has been a big issue. An overflow in excess of 100,000 gallons was experienced at that lift station during the first flooding rain event. Public notification was issued as required by TCEQ. Once current and future construction is completed, overflows of this magnitude will be greatly minimized. Mr. Ellis noted the plant is performing relatively well during the flooding with only minor ammonia spikes. He also informed the Directors that a CCMA truck had recently caught on fire in the Northcliffe area and is being addressed with the insurance carrier. 8. Consideration /Approval to Allow the General Manager to Procure Long Lead Time Equipment for the Town Creek Force Main Project: Mr. Sherman explained in order to expedite the project schedule, long lead item equipment has been identified and which can be pre - purchased. The submersible pump and generator are the main targets for the pre - purchase and costs would be scored using a best value method with 55% weight on price and 45% weight on other technical criteria. Mr. Sherman anticipates a 14 to 15 week lead time on these items. There was some discussion on generator vs diesel pump and Mr. Sherman will coordinate with the engineer to evaluate. Mr. Brand motioned for approval to allow the General Manager to procure long lead time equipment for the lift station using scoring method recommended with Mr. Greaves seconding. All Directors voted aye. 9. Consideration /Approval to Submit Annexation Request for the South Plant to the City of Schertz: Mr. Ellis stated this request would allow CCMA to utilize public services provided by the City of Schertz, and which would assist in the construction process by avoiding planning delays. Mrs. Agee Special Brd.Mtg.Minutes 6 -2 -2016 Page 1 motioned for approval to submit the request to the City of Schertz with Mr. Brand seconding and all Directors voting aye. 10. First Presentation of Draft FY2017 Budget: Mr. Madsen shared with the Directors a powerpoint presentation which included the budget overview /comparison with the FY2016 budget; projected revenue; debt service /reserve fund payments; health/life /disability insurance costs; and salaries /benefits. Copies of the draft budget were distributed. Regarding the insurance costs slide, Mrs. Agee would like to see loss ratio and Mr. Madsen will follow up. After general discussion, it was the consensus of the Directors to budget 8 -10% for medical increase. Mr. Madsen will reach out to BDI and TML for firmer projection numbers. It. Presentation/Discussion on Salary Structure and Associated Exams: Mr. Madsen explained job descriptions and corresponding pay grades have been established. The Department Heads have organized binders with job descriptions and job level assessments or tests. A sample binder was made available for review. He was asking for the Board's direction to establish a method of adjusting the pay grade table on an annual basis. Discussion followed on keeping pay grades up to date on a yearly basis so as not to fall behind. A single pay grade rather than a range within a position was discussed and Mr. Madsen will continue to fine tune the structure and bring updates back to the Directors. 12. Consideration /Approval of Retirement Plan Participant Loan Program Resolution: The resolution was given to the Directors for their review with Mr. Ellis noting this is an IRS required restatement of CCMA's retirement plan. No substantive changes were made to the plan. Mrs. Agee motioned for approval of the resolution with Mr. Greaves seconding and all Directors voting aye. 13. Administrative Section: 13.1) End of Month Reports -May: Mr. Madsen reviewed Reports #1, #2 and #3 with no questions being asked. The capital budget report had been updated. 13.2) Approval of Expenditure List -May 25, 2016: Mr. Jacobs motioned for approval of the list in the amount of $132,999.87. Mr. Greaves seconded and all Directors voted aye. 14. Staff Reports Pertaining to: (1) Update on OJR Plant Expansion: Mr. Sherman stated the bidding documents for the belt press are being fine tuned and the advertisement will be published this Sunday. The TWDB is finalizing their review. (2) Update on South Plant: A project review meeting had been held and staff s comments are being addressed. The engineer estimates they are one month out from a 90% plan review. (3) Update on Dietz Creek Lift Station Project: The shoring beams have been installed. Mobilization has begun to excavate the wet well. (4) Update on Town Creek Force Main: Design work is approaching completion. 15. Requests by Directors and /or General Manager for items to be Placed on a Future Agenda: Referring back to discussion on salary structure, Mr. Ellis may include an agenda item for approval of a compensation committee on a future agenda. 16. Adiournment: Being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 7:49 p.m. AUTHORITY SEAL APPROVED: Ken Greenwald, President ATTEST: Reginna Agee, Secretary - Treasurer Special Brd.Mtg.Minutes 6 -2 -2016 Page 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: December 13, 2016 Department: Subject: Agenda No. 6 Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 16 -S -39 — Conduct a Public Hearing and consideration and /or action on a request for a Specific Use Permit and associated site plan to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps on an approximate 1. acre site. The property is more specifically described as Lot 9, Block 1 of the Murphy USA #7186 -Wal -Mart #3391 Subdivision; City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas; located at 17601 Four Oaks Lane. (First Reading) Murphy Oil USA, Inc. is requesting approval of a Specific Use Permit and associated site plan to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 1 acre of land located at 17601 Four Oaks Lane and more specifically described as Lot 9, Block 1 of the Murphy USA #7186 -Wal- Mart #3391 Subdivision. The proposed development includes a 1,200 square foot convenience store with sixteen (1.6) gas pumps. The subject property is currently developed as a Murphy Oil USA fueling station and the owner is proposing the same use that currently exists at the site. The proposed project would involve demolishing the existing structures and redeveloping the site with a new building, canopy, and accessory equipment. Redeveloping the site requires a new specific use permit. Access to the site will be through two existing shared driveways off Four Oaks Lane. The subject property is currently zoned General Business II (GB -2). The City's Unified Development Code (UDC) includes Table 21.5.8 Permitted Uses, which identifies different land uses that are permitted within each zoning district. The General Business II (GB -2) zoning district permits convenience stores with gas pumps, subject to approval of a Specific Use Permit. Specific Use Permits allow for discretionary approval by City Council for uses with unique or widely varying operating characteristics or unusual site development features. Approval of a Specific Use :Permit authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications. On October 26, 2016 the Planning & Zoning Commission recommended approval of the Specific Use Permit. Public hearing notices were published in the Daily Commercial. Recorder on City Council Memorandum Page 2 November 23, 2016 and in the Herald on November 30, 2016. Prior to the Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, eight (8) public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners and no responses were received. Goal Murphy Oil USA, Inc. is requesting a Specific Use Permit to redevelop the site at 1.7601 Four Oaks Lane to improve the layout. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action IMPACT ON EXISTING ADJACENT DEVELOPMENT: The subject property is adjacent to an existing fast food restaurant with a drive -thru immediately to the west, existing retail uses to the immediate south, existing retail uses to the north across Four Oaks Lane, and a parking lot for the existing Wal -Mart store to the west. The proposed convenience store with gas pumps is a land use that is compatible with the existing commercial land uses in the area. SITE PLAN: The applicant is proposing to construct a 1,200 square foot convenience store with sixteen (16) gas pumps (Murphy Oil) on the approximately 1 acre tract of land. • Architectural Standards: Section 21.9.5 Exterior construction and Design standards requires all non - residential buildings to meet the minimum masonry requirements, fagade articulations and percentage of windows and doors. The proposed building elevations comply with the Exterior Construction and Design standard. The building and gas canopy will include brick and stucco finish with the front fagade consisting of 38% windows and doors. Additionally, the building complies with the vertical and horizontal articulations on all required walls. • Parking: The project includes five (5) parking spaces of which one (1) will be handicap parking which meets the minimum parking standard for the proposed use. • Screening requirements: The site has satisfied the minimum requirements for the location and screening of accessory structures. The vacuum pad, ice units and propane tank storage are located on the south side of the property and will be screened by proposed vegetation and by the proposed convenience store. The trash receptacle will be constructed of masonry with metal gates that meet the minimum requirements. • Lis!htin2 and Aare standards: The applicant will be responsible for complying with Section 21.9.11 Lighting and Glare standards at the time of building permit. A note has been placed on the site plan. • Landscapini: The UDC requires that non - residential development adjacent to right -of- way requires a landscape buffer. Four existing oak trees will remain and a Texas Redbud is proposed along Four Oaks Lane, which complies with the required ratio of one (1) tree per fifty (50) feet along Four Oaks Lane. Six (6) additional shade trees will be planted City Council Memorandum Page 3 along the southern property line and an existing oak tree along the easterly property line will remain. Shrub screening will be planted adjacent to all vehicle use areas. The remaining landscaped area will be grass sod. All landscaping will be watered by an automatic irrigation system. • Access and circulation: The site is accessed through two shared driveways that currently exist off Four Oaks Lane. Both drive isles exceed 30 feet in width to allow for two -way traffic. A twenty five foot fire lane is proposed on the property allow for emergency vehicle access. CONDITIONS OF THE REQUESTED SPECIFIC USE PERMIT: The proposed convenience store with gas pumps will be subject to provisions of the Unified Development Code (Ordinance 1.1- S -1.5, as amended). Additionally, the Specific Use Permit will be conditioned upon the following occurring: a) A building permit is approved within one year of the adoption of the SUP ordinance; and b) The use begins operation within two years of the issuance of the necessary building permit(s). A Specific Use Permit allows for discretionary City Council approval of uses with unique or widely varying operating characteristics or unusual site development features, subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this UDC. Approval of a specific use permit authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the approved Specific Use Permit. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on October 26, 2016 and offered a recommendation of approval. Staff recommends approval of the Specific Use Permit request. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 1.6 -S -39 ORDINANCE NO. 16 -S -39 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS TO APPROVE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR OPERATION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS AT 17601 FOUR OAKS LANE, SCHERTZ, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS WHEREAS, An application for Specific Use Permit to allow a Convenience Store with gas pumps at 17601 Four Oaks Lane, more particularly described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, as Lot 9, :Block 1 of the Murphy USA #71.86 -Wa] -Mart #3391. Subdivision (hereinafter, the "Property ") has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City's Unified Development Code Section 21.5.11.E. provides for certain conditions to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested specific use permit (the "Conditions "); and WHEREAS, on October 26, 2016, . the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Conditions, hereby makes a recommendation of approval of a Specific Use Permit for a Convenience Store with gas pumps; and WHEREAS; on December 1.3, 2016 . the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Conditions and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested Specific Use Permit be approved as provided for herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. A Specific Use Permit for 17601 Four Oaks Lane, as more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, is hereby approved to allow a convenience store with gas pumps conditioned upon the following occurring: a) A building permit is approved within one year of the adoption of this ordinance; and b) The use begins operation within two years of the issuance of the necessary building permit(s). Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. Approved on first reading the 13th day of December, 2016. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 20th day of December, 2016. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) Exhibit A "The Property" See Attached OWNER ADDRESS: 1683 WALNUT GROVE AVE OWNER ADDRESS: 70 NE LOOP 410 STE 450 ROSEMEAD, CA 91770 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78216 1671"10 hol 1111 101, KIM -_ - - all 12 1 l] 0 1 mil 0101=21 111110 FOUR OAKS LN SCHERTZ, TX 78151 ormo,100=1 L 0 00101mily'allolixem�• 1611"10 low'' 11 ff PROPERTY ADDRES991 1671"10 hol r", 1111 604, 6102 FM 3009 SCHERTZ, TX 7815-r� 6018 FM 3009 1 SCHERTZ, TX 7815 2049 TRIVIZ LAS CRUCES, NM 8801 50 0 0 215 510 IN FEET 1 inch = 50 ft EXISTING ACRES: 0.78 AC (PRE-DEVELOPED) PROPOSED ACRES: 0.78 AC (POST DEVELOPED) PROPOSED USE: CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS il SITE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. ZONING: GB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS-2 DISTRICT LEGEND = PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE = EASEMENT LINE = EXISTING CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER = BOUNDARY LINE = CONCRETE INTEGRAL CURB - - - - - - - - - -- -- - - - -- - -- = WOOD FENCE — - — - — - — = ADJACENT PARCEL BOUNDARY = EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER & JUNCTION BOX = EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = EXISTING STREET SIGN = WATER METER = WATER VAL VE = CLEANOUT ------- = STORM DRAIN INLET ------------ = STORM DRAIN MANHOLE = EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION = UTILITY POLE = EXISTING TREE = CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK 911r, a "M I GENERAL SITE NOTES ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, PANEL 48187CO21OF, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. DOLMAN ROBERT & CHRISTINE TRUST LAND USE: BANK P.O. BOX 552 MCARTHUR, CA 96056 PROPERTY ID: 126128 FM 3009 RETAIL BLOCK 1, LOT 3 1.098 AC LINE OF F.M. 3009 ..... ....... .. 240' TO INTERSECTION— ............ ... FOUR (C)AK!1`53)�' LANEC."_'. 'K RULT TRA IL) (60' PQBLIC RIGHT OF WAY�) (ASF` BHA, LTA'A,W,M FAT T) (M 6, frp, 077-6742, AR.) EXISTING LATITUDE. 29 36'13.25" NORTH SIDEWALK P E: LONGITUDE: 98'16'41.95" WEST rs NWC 3009/FOUR OAKS LTC LAND USE: RETAIL STRIP CENTER 6032 FOUR OAKS LN SHERTZ, TX 78154 PROPERTY ID: 129819 FM 3009 RETAIL BLOCK 1, LOT 7 3.562 AC ZONED GB-2� BENCHMARK IOSED 'Y' ON TOP NORTH BOL T -WALK ELEVATION=841,42 FEET FND. 112 "1, R: ul) ................................................................ ...... .. .. .. .. .. .. . . ......................... ............... — . ......... ............. ............... ... ............ ............... . . . . ........................... - — --------------- 00' 46� NIDHI PARTNERS LTD LAND USE: VACANT 201 QUARRY SPRINGS DR SAN MARCOS, TX 78666 PROPERTY ID: 131908 LA QUINTA INN–SCHERTZ BLOCK 1, LOT 5 1.413 AC ZONED GB-2 7, 2. 1 - ------------- -------------- ---------- --------- --------- -- - ------ -- ------ - -------- ---------- - ---------------- :11, ------------- ------------------------ ----------------- ------------------- -- — - --------------- k . I of---- [---2 LLJ IVOV 6.46' -i �` WAL–MART REAL ESTATE BUSINESS TRUST LAND USE: DISCOUNT STORE ° z BOX 8050 1 03 MS 0555 BENTONVILLE, AR 72712 -8050 1� 5 PROPERTY ID: 134191 3 WALMART SUPERCENTER BLOCK 1 LOT 10 1200SF-8(S) '3 0 q LIJ 23.967 AC 2015v2 I t 0 '00 n M-1 o) F.F.E 839.75 FUEL CANOPY 00 25' FIRE LANE A CONCRETE WHEEL STOP 0.35� (TYP) 164 SF ----------- .................. "o" 6. P'_. 6 i77 679, 4- X /'AIK PROPANE VACCUM PAD PAD ENCLOSURE WITH 0 SOLID METAL GATE ....... ... q, - ------ g V�' g' p ti is 7vt q F ------------- G"A V/ A ZONING: GB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS-2 DISTRICT ar PROPOSED TRAFFIC STOP BAR ZONING GB-2 (GENERAL BUSINESS) BOND BEAM TO BE CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PROPOSED USE = EXISTING STREET SIGN PUMPS BUILDING AREA(GROSS SF) 1200 SF BUILDING HEIGHT 14'-1" (1 STORY) WITH CONCRETE. CONCRETE S.F. ACRES MURPHY AREA 33,899 0.780 IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (76%) 25,741 0.1590 TOTAL PARKING: EXIS77NG TREE 5 REQUIRED/ -3 PROVIDED REQUIRED/PROVIDED CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK HANDICAP SPACES 1 SETBACKS FRONT: 25' SIGNAGE Ao 20 0 10 20 IN FEET 1 inch = 20 ft 11• 1. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, PANEL 48187CO210F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. 2. THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH ALL LIGHTING AND GLARE STANDARDS ACCORDING TO SCHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. 3. ALL SIGNS WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF SCHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATION: GROSS PARKING AREA = 25,293 - 6,6854 (COVERED AREA) = 18,439 SF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED = 18,439 X 0.10 = 1,843.9 USED 1,844 SF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PARKING AREA PROVIDED = 718.9 SF + 501.6 SF + 408.1 SF + 330.6 SF = 1,59.2 SF vaim Come, Slore Iran i. f I&Dbukl. SITE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. PROPOSED TRAFFIC STOP BAR EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER & JUNCTION BOX BOND BEAM TO BE EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = EXISTING STREET SIGN REINFORCED AND FILLED A/ WATER VALVE CLEANOU T WITH CONCRETE. CONCRETE STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN MANHOLE TO BE ROLLED OVER CONCRETE BOLLARD UTILITY POLE EXIS77NG TREE CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONCRETE PAD L — — — — — TRASH ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD . . . EXISTING BUILDING o VDIA. TYP. .1 00 • TYR OF 6. SEE SECTION 8 FOR LOCATION AND PLACEMENT I-Wx 7'-1/2- SOLID METAL GATE. FASTENED WITH (3) SELF TAPPING SCREWS PER 1­1 BOARD (MIDDLE, TOP, AND BOTTOM), COLOR TO MATCH BLDG. EXTERIOR FINISH 0 GATE PULL HANDLE. BOTH SIDES MONROE PH-0240 OR EQUIVALENT. MIN. SPECS; PROJECTION: 2.06" GRIP WIDTH: 0.56" GRIP HEIGHT: 1.00" 18, 8"_ 1 —16'-8" _8"_ 15'-4" El El 3' 3' 4'-8" '" — 4-8 3 7- 4D-6'DLk TYP. 0 #4 BARS 0 32" D.C. GROUT 4 J-BARS_ 0 32' D.C. I t REINFORCED VOID 00 A A 3' 8' MASONRY BLOCK O.C. WALL COLOR TO PLACED IN BOND BEAM AND MATCH BUILDING EMBEDDED IN CONCRETE I x4 x 7 -1/2" SOLID METAL GATE. EXTERIOR. FASTENED WITH (3) SELF TAPPING SCREWS PER BOARD (MIDDLE, TOP, AND BOTTOM). COLOR TO MATCH BLDG. EXTERIOR KNISH C IC GO mwmnmm PIM Va DUMESTER ENCLOSURE 11• 1. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, PANEL 48187CO210F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOOD PLAIN. 2. THE SITE WILL COMPLY WITH ALL LIGHTING AND GLARE STANDARDS ACCORDING TO SCHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. 3. ALL SIGNS WILL COMPLY WITH THE CITY OF SCHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA CALCULATION: GROSS PARKING AREA = 25,293 - 6,6854 (COVERED AREA) = 18,439 SF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREA REQUIRED = 18,439 X 0.10 = 1,843.9 USED 1,844 SF INTERIOR LANDSCAPE PARKING AREA PROVIDED = 718.9 SF + 501.6 SF + 408.1 SF + 330.6 SF = 1,59.2 SF vaim Come, Slore Iran i. f I&Dbukl. SITE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ THIS SITE PLAN OF THE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY OF SCHERTZ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF — — – — 20___. PROPOSED TRAFFIC STOP BAR EXISTING ELECTRICAL METER & JUNCTION BOX EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = EXISTING STREET SIGN WATER METER A/ WATER VALVE CLEANOU T STORM DRAIN INLET STORM DRAIN MANHOLE EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION CONCRETE BOLLARD UTILITY POLE EXIS77NG TREE CONCRETE PAVEMENT/SIDEWALK UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONCRETE PAD L — — — — — TRASH ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD . . . EXISTING BUILDING APPROVAL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ THIS SITE PLAN OF THE HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY OF SCHERTZ DEVELOPMENT REVIEW STAFF, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED ON THIS DAY OF — — – — 20___. INSPECTION DIVISION PLANNING DIVISION ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FIRE DEPARTMENT PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT ( t NEW BED LINE F-0RMEh v RYE TRAIL) (60' PURL C RIGI-IT OF WAY) DWARF BURF9 D HOLLY GULF COAST MUHLY ('ASPHALT PA VEM FEN (14) (29) '° 44417 EX. TREE TO REMAIN BERMUDA GRASS EX. TREE TO REMAIN (2,075 sf) - -_ ---- 5PEAIC A/?/< Chi TOO NORTH BOLT BERMUDA GRASS GULF COAST MU MUHLY_ LE VA � N =, 41.42 FEET 7 (1,864 sf 8 DWARF BURFORD HOLLY 6) TIE NEW BED FWITH TO EXISTING PLANT BED SMOOTH f f t , 1 S, ,,,,,, ....... ............................. ............ .. , .... ,is •. .. t., '\—BERMUDA GRASS C (1541 sf) _ _ v _� e V GULF COAST MUHLY (12) _ . DWARF BURFORD HOLLY , e (64) NELLIE STEVENS HOLD ( ) � I. (3 rx) 3f 3j �J PLANT SCHEDULE TREES OTY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME CONT CAL SIZE REMARKS 7 Quercus shumardii / Shumard Red Oak B & B 3 "Cal 12 -15` H Well Branched, Dense, Straight trunk SHRUBS QTY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME SIZE HEIGHT REMARKS C 181 Ilex cornuta `Burfordii Nana' / Dwarf Burford Holly 5 gal 30" MIN. Full, Dense, Bushy �) 10 Ilex x `Nellie R Stevens` / Nellie Stevens Holly 15 gal 8` MIN. Full to ground, Dense, Bushy 109 Muhlenbergia capillaris `Gulf Coast` / Gulf Coast Muhly 1 gal Well Rooted in Pot 25 Rhaphiolepis indica `Indian Princess` TM / Indian Hawthorne 5 gal 24" MIN. Full, Dense, Well Rooted 5 Rosa x `Blushing Knockout` / Blushing Knockout 5 gal 30" MIN. Full, Dense, Well Rooted SOD SEED CITY BOTANICAL NAME / COMMON NAME CONT REMARKS 6,899 sf Cynodon dactylon `Tif 419` / Bermuda Grass sod Certified Pure Weed Free M F'PuY U 'E_Dt OL I d, PEACH ST. EL DORADO, AR 717 3`0 120• To moo. PLAN ODEGRADABLE TWINE STRAPS (3) AT ?0' APART. ATTACH IN A BRANCH CROTCH 'PROX. 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF THE MAIN rEM, OR AT FIRST AVAILABLE BRANCH BOTCH ABOVE THAT POINT =T PLANT WITH 1/8 HEIGHT OF )OTBALL ABOVE EXISTING GRADE NESTRAW MULCH, 3" MIN. REATE SOIL SAUCER W/ TOPSOIL. TAKES 2 "X2" WOODEN STAKES OR ETAL ANCHORS. CUT STAKES LONG NOUGH FOR SECURE GRIP IN SUBGRADE. NGLE STAKES 20- 30'OFF VERTICAL. SE 3 STAKES PLACED EQUAL DISTANCE PART. 4 STAKES MAY BE NECESSARY FOR REES GREATER THAN 4" CALIPER. INISHED GRADE LL (SEE ROOTBALL AIL) IG SOIL MIX JRBED SUBGRADE. NOTE: STRAPS, WIDE, SOFT, BIODEGRADABLE MATERIAL MANUFACTURED FOR THE PURPOSE OF TREE ANCHORING. DO NOT USE HOSE AND WIRE. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING N.T.S. GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES A. LOCATE ALL UTILITIES AND SITE LIGHTING CONDUITS BEFORE LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. B. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY LAYOUT DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY PLANTING. C. ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK. (ANSI -Z60.1 -1986) D. ALL SLOPES AND AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GRADED SMOOTH AND FOUR INCHES OF TOPSOIL APPLIED. IF ADEQUATE TOPSOIL IS NOT AVAILABLE ON SITE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TOPSOIL. APPROVED BY THE OWNER, AS NEEDED. THE AREA SHALL THEN BE SEEDED /SODDED, FERTILIZED, MULCHED, WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL HARDY GRASS GROWTH IS ESTABLISHED IN ALL AREAS. ANY RELOCATED TREES SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL SUCH POINT AS TREE IS RE- ESTABLISHED. ANY AREAS DISTURBED SHALL ANY REASON PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT SHALL BE CORRECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT NO ADDITIONAL. COST TO THE OWNER. E. CONTRACTOR IS TO VERIFY LOCATION OF MASTER DEVELOPMENT IRRIGATION SYSTEM, VALVE BOXES, CONTROL BOXES, BACKFLOW PREVENTION DEVICES AND OTHER ITEMS WHICH ARE PART OF THE SYSTEM. IF DAMAGED THEY MUST BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S COST. F. CONTRACTOR IS TO PROTECT EXISTING LANDSCAPING /IRRIGATION MATERIALS. G. ACCEPTANCE OF GRADING AND SEEDING SHALL BE BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND /OR OWNER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES FOR A MINIMUM OF ONE (1) YEAR OR UNTIL SECOND CUTTING, WHICHEVER IS LONGER. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, WEEDING, RESEEDING, AND OTHER OPERATIONS NECESSARY TO KEEP ALL LAWN AREAS IN A THRIVING CONDITIONS. UPON FINAL ACCEPTANCE, OWNER SHALL ASSUME ALL MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. AFTER LAWN AREA HAVE GERMINATED, AREAS WHICH FAIL TO SHOW A UNIFORM STAND OF GRASS FOR ANY REASON WHATSOEVER SHALL BE RE- SEEDED REPEATEDLY UNTIL ALL AREAS ARE COVERED WITH A SATISFACTORY STAND OF GRASS. MINIMUM ACCEPTANCE OF SEEDED LAWN AREAS MAY INCLUDE SCATTERED BARE SPOTS, NONE OF WHICH ARE LARGER THAN 1 SQUARE FOOT, AND WHEN COMBINED DO NOT EXCEED 2% OF TOTAL SEEDED LAWN AREA. IRRIGATION NOTE ALL GREEN SPACE AND LANDSCAPING WILL BE MAINTAINED BY AUTOMATIC INGROUND WATERING SYSTEM SIGN 10' ZONING: GB-2 GENERAL BUSINESS-2 DISTRICT 20 0 10 20 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 20 ft SET TOP OF ROOTBALL 2" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE MULCH — 1/2" DEEP AT STEM, 3" DEEP BETWEEN PLANTS. CREATE SOIL SAUCER W/ TOPSOIL MINIMUM DEPTH OF 12" PLANTING SOIL FOR GROUNDCOVER BED. EXCAVATE ENTIRE BED SPECIFIED FOR GROUND —COVER BED. AMEND W /PEAT MOSS. OR PLANTING SOIL. FINISHED GRADE (SEE GRADING PLAN) 4' TYP. — PREPARED PLANTING SOIL AS SPECIFIED. NOTE: WHEN GROUNDCOVERS AND SHRUBS ARE USED IN MASSES, ENTIRE BED IS TO „ BE EXCAVATED TO RECEIVE PLANTING SOIL 4 .4- AND PLANT MATERIAL SHRUB PLANTING 50B N.T.S. ..0 e EXISTING LEGEND = UTILITY POLE = PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE SITE, eickiatA. = EASEMENT LINE vi as, a.E {S LANDSCAPE AREA Hu rnKI ca c ° t USA .v�� i_sj `/ = EXISTING CONCRETE &�k it nC�n f iv°efrle, (-9hv'?a5 fn %po-ft3 CURB & GUTTER Cap trx 0,1e Bank S 7 �r+ = STORM DRAIN INLET Dolla, hest 4 = EXISTING STREET SIGN TREE PRESERVATION (FOR PROTECTED AND /OR HERITAGE TREES) Sf/N = EXISTING TREE = STORM DRAIN MANHOLE vakerc Comer Story - - - = EXIS77NG ELECTRICAL METER & JUNCTION BOX A- AAAIK.ey Mmi Sio rage N WORK (CLEARING, GRUBBING OR GRADING). CLEARING SHALL BE DONE BY Jet-k n td'e R"'. -? Shell 2 I THE SOIL. BACKFILL ROOT AREAS WITH GOOD QUALITY TOP SOIL IMMEDIATELY. IF t lie W''£S eln ', . Fzla'daelKl Pius Atrium Inn :ar ."rtwrsas ElKa�ta*In - Sen Anti KFC In, t Lb rlj Dorm o"s pizzi f9 l t,p h+fr:Crr�ir3t.: SITE LOCATION MAP N.T.S. EXISTING LEGEND = UTILITY POLE = PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE - = WOOD FENCE = EASEMENT LINE = LIGHT POLE LANDSCAPE AREA = UNDERGROUND WATER LINE(AS MARKED BY UTILITY) = EXISTING CONCRETE = WATER METER CURB & GUTTER = WATER VALVE 7 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING ALL = STORM DRAIN INLET = CLEANOUT 4 = EXISTING STREET SIGN TREE PRESERVATION (FOR PROTECTED AND /OR HERITAGE TREES) 1 PROTECTED TREE ONSITE 8" CAL. = EXISTING TREE = STORM DRAIN MANHOLE = EXISTING SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE - - - = EXIS77NG ELECTRICAL METER & JUNCTION BOX LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS - = WOOD FENCE REQUIRED PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA = UNDERGROUND WATER LINE(AS MARKED BY UTILITY) 20 %(6,779 SF) ROTECTION NOTES: SITE TREES (9 PER ACRE) = SANITARY SEWER LINE 7 SHOWN ON THIS PLAN TO BE RETAINED SHALL BE PROTECTED DURING ALL PERIMETER LANDSCAPE - = UNDERGROUND ELEC. LINE(AS MARKED BY UTILITY) 4 DEMOLITION /CONSTRUCTION WITH TEMPORARY FENCING. IT SHALL BE THE TREE PRESERVATION (FOR PROTECTED AND /OR HERITAGE TREES) 1 PROTECTED TREE ONSITE 8" CAL. (25 %) ONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO COORDINATE WITH LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE(PER CEI SURVEY) =CTION FENCES SHALL BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY SITE = UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLE(PER CEI SURVEY) N WORK (CLEARING, GRUBBING OR GRADING). CLEARING SHALL BE DONE BY = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE EXPOSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE PRUNED WITH A CLEAN CUT I THE SOIL. BACKFILL ROOT AREAS WITH GOOD QUALITY TOP SOIL IMMEDIATELY. IF = UNDERGROUND GAS LINE(PER CEI SURVEY) DOT AREAS ARE NOT BACKFILLED WITHIN 2 DAYS, COVER THEM WITH ORGANIC A MANNER WHICH REDUCES SOIL TEMPERATURE AND MINIMIZES WATER LOSS DUE 4TION. = EXISTING TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION :XCAVATION OR GRADE CUTTING WITHIN TREE DRIP LINES, MAKE A CLEAN CUT -IE DISTURBED AND UNDISTURBED ROOT ZONES WITH A ROCK SAW OR SIMILAR TO MINIMIZE DAMAGE TO REMAINING ROOTS. PROPOSED LEGEND T HEAVILY IMPACTED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHOULD BE WATERED DEEPLY :EK DURING PERIODS OF HOT, DRY WEATHER. TREE CROWNS SHOULD BE SPRAYED = BOUNDARY LINE ' PERIODICALLY TO REDUCE DUST ACCUMULATION ON THE LEAVES. = CURB INLET TREES OR ANY NATURAL RESOURCE DUE TO CONTRACTOR'S NEGLIGENCE DURING = CONCRETE INTEGRAL CURB RUCTION PHASE SHALL BE APPRAISED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND EPAIRED, REPLACED, OR COMPENSATED. = SANITARY SEWER SERVICE = CURB INLET = UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE = CONCRETE BOLLARD = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SERVICE 4' HIGH, ORANGE, = GREASE TRAP POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR = WATER SERVICE SAFETY NETTING, STAKES ® 6' O.C. MIN. OF 10' FROM TRUNK of TREE. 0 = TREE PROTECTION FENCE C = 90 DEGREE BEND ME ;oTM- STM -M ME = PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE C = TEE INTERSECTION FENCE POST CO = CLEAN OUT \NM = 1" DOMESTIC WATER METER 0 = 1" IRRIGATION METER 2' = 1" RPZ BACKFLOW PREVENTER = 1" IRRIGATION BACKFLOW PREVENTER = NYLOPLAST STORM DRAINAGE STRUCTURE PROPOSED TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION PROPOSED TRAFFIC STOP BAR = CONCRETE PAVEMENT /SIDEWALK = UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS CONCRETE PAD L- - - - --1 = TRASH ENCLOSURE CONCRETE PAD = EXISTING BUILDING LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS REQUIRED PROVIDED LANDSCAPE AREA TOTAL AREA = 33,899 SF 20 %(6,779 SF) 24 %(8,241 SF) - 59% (4,923SF) IN FRONT YARD SITE TREES (9 PER ACRE) .778 AC X 9 = 7.0 7 7-PROPOSED 5 - EXISTING PERIMETER LANDSCAPE 1 TREE PER 50 LF (194 LF / 50 = 3.88) 4 4 EXISTING TO REMAIN TREE PRESERVATION (FOR PROTECTED AND /OR HERITAGE TREES) 1 PROTECTED TREE ONSITE 8" CAL. (25 %) 1 TREE (100 %) �II�[�I:I�I7dI►l 1856 Lockhill— Selma, Suite 105 OWNER: MURPHY OIL USA, INC DEVELOPER: MURPHY OIL USA INC San Antonio, Texas 78213 200 PEACH ST. 200 PEACH ST. PH. 210- 342 -9455 ELDORADO, AR 71730 EL DORADO, AR 71730 FAX 210- 342 -9524 CONTACT: BASSAM ZIADA CONTACT: BASSAM ZIADA )1990 -2014, Maverick Land Surveying Co. (P):870- 875 -7636 (P):870 -875 -7636 Greenberghrrow 1430 W. PEACHTREE ST. NW SUITE 200 ATLANTA, GA 30309 PHONE: (404) 6014000 FAX: (404) 6013970 DWG NAME: SCHERTZ, TX JOB NO.: 20150472 MU-P,tip USA s7186 WAL MART >t LOT • BL CI) Cry 1 0.78 ACRES 17601 FOUR OAKS LANE SHEET NO. CITY OF SCHERTZ GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS REV-0 • •' . SP-2 10-05-16 11'- 515/256" 10' -8" 10' -1 1/2" 13' -4" 2' -3" V -10" STUCCO 9" 7'-4" C -3 EQ_ L O 0 r O F 0 io M 0 CV i� 00 N 00 v ih 0 r 9" 46' -0" 2'-3" STUCCO C -6 15'-4" 22' -6 1/2" 8' -6 241/256" I I \ \ D -13 - I - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 1I I II WINDOW AND DOOR HAS SECURITY SHUTTER CONCEALED IN THE AWNING AND TOWER - ------------------------------- MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - SEE CLOSED POSITION DETAIL 4/E2 MATERIAL AREA (BLDG FACADE) AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED D -13 I I' 1 I II 1 i I I I I I I' I I I I I , 439 SF 100% GLAZING 193 SF 30% OF 632 SF = 190 SF D -13 _ . I I \ \ D -13 - I - - - - -- - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- 1I I II WINDOW AND DOOR HAS SECURITY SHUTTER CONCEALED IN THE AWNING AND TOWER - ------------------------------- MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - SEE CLOSED POSITION DETAIL 4/E2 MATERIAL AREA (BLDG FACADE) AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED PERCENTAGE PROVIDED BRICK STUCCO 147 SF 80% OF 439 SF = 351 SF 292 SF 439 SF 100% GLAZING 193 SF 30% OF 632 SF = 190 SF 193 SF 30.5% TOTAL 632 SF (439 SF UN- GLAZED) KEYED NOTES: NOT USED --- - - - - -- BY FMS 2 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM KAWNEER, YKK OR EQUAL C -7 3 EXTERIOR LIGHTING, REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN SHEET El 4 4" x 4" PAINTED METAL CORRUGATED DOWNSPOUTS ----------------------------------- 1 C -3 1 5 DOORS (EXTERIOR SIDE) AND DOOR FRAMES PAINTED C -3 i 6 LITHONIA REMOTE EMERGENCY HEAD #ELA SHEET El 7 FAUX - WINDOW /SPANDREL GLAZING SYSTEM C -8 i EXTERIOR FINISHES: ESTUCCO STUCCO FINISH - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- BY FMS BRICK THIN BRICK BY FMS MTL 20 GA. SHEET METAL (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) BY FMS EXTERIOR PAINT /COLORS: N C_1 THIN BRICK VENEER - PEBBLE BEACH VELOUR BY ENDICOTT (WIRE CUT FINISH) BY FMS C_2 THIN BRICK VENEER - EMPIRE IVORY VELOUR BY CAROLINA CERAMICS (WIRE CUT FINISH) BY FMS C -3 'DORMER BROWN' SW #7521 - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- BY FMS STUCCO 'SUMMIT GRAY' SW #7669 BY FMS C -5 BY FMS OPEN C-6 STUCCO 'REAL RED' SW #6868 BY FMS FC-7 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BY FMS C-8 COLOR TO MATCH 'WARM GREY' V933 (BY VIRACON ) BY FMS RIGHT ELEVATION 1/2" V-0" WINDOW HAS SECURITY SHUTTER - MODEL EX60 BY -------------- FROST PROOF HOSE BIB ARROWHEAD BRASS ----------J EMERGENCY SHUT -OFF SWITCH BY FME @ 48" AFF WHEATBELT - SEE CLOSED POSITION DETAIL 4 /E1 PRODUCTS OR EQUAL @24" AFF 4 LINE OF ROOF OVERFLOW i CO2 ENCLOSURE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5 i i i i STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 MTL C -3 ih 1,.4 STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 DOWNSPOUT TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER, SEE CIVIL DWGS. FOR COORDINATION BRICK C -1 CO2 ENCLOSURE GRADE 0" DOWNSPOUT TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER, SEE CIVIL DWGS. FOR COORDINATION WINDOW HAS SECURITY SHUTTER - MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - CLOSED POSITION GRADE 0; 0„ - SECURITY SHUTTER @ WINDOW 1/2" = 1' -0" Greenberghrrow 21 South Evergreen Avenue Suite 200 Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 t: 847.788.9200 COPYRIGHT NOTICE This drawinq is the property of the above referenced Professional and is not to be used for any purpose other than the specific project and site named herein, and cannot be reproduced in any manner without the express written permission from the Professional. ISSUE RECORD DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 07/22/2016 ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 08/23/2016 1 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 10/05/2016 3 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE FRANK GRIECO PROJECT MANAGER CHRIS CERBO QUALITY CONTROL JOHN NASHED DRAWN BY JAMES CONNAUGHTON PROJECT NAME I I ' VIN SCHERTZ, TX 78154 1 I�S S I R U C `I' Lb 18 E 1801 Rockdale Industrial Blvd. Conyers, Georgia 30012 Voice: (800) 366 -6385 Fax: (770) 483 -6037 FMS JOB NUMBER G16M000107 FMS MODEL NUMBER XXXXXX PROJECT NUMBER 20150472.0 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER PROTO V2.0 05/20/207 6 N M OVERFLOW L7O BRICK °° c -1 3 0 N BRICK C -2 w 2' -01, 3.. 4, -6.. 3.. 00 Eo_� -- BRICK C -1 iy 0 r -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- FROST PROOF HOSE BIB ARROWHEAD BRASS REAR ELEVATION SOUTH PRODUCTS OR EQUAL @ 24" AFF Z 1/2" = V -0" MATERIAL AREA (BLDG FACADE) AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED PERCENTAGE PROVIDED PR --------------------------------------------------------------- BRICK -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - 233 SF - - - -- - -- - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------- 80% OF 380 SF = 304 SF -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- ___ ---- - - - - -- 38OF 100% STUCCO 147 SF GLAZING 0 SF EXEMPT - - TOTAL 380 SF 4 LINE OF ROOF OVERFLOW i CO2 ENCLOSURE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 5 i i i i STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 MTL C -3 ih 1,.4 STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 DOWNSPOUT TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER, SEE CIVIL DWGS. FOR COORDINATION BRICK C -1 CO2 ENCLOSURE GRADE 0" DOWNSPOUT TO BE CONNECTED TO STORM SEWER, SEE CIVIL DWGS. FOR COORDINATION WINDOW HAS SECURITY SHUTTER - MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - CLOSED POSITION GRADE 0; 0„ - SECURITY SHUTTER @ WINDOW 1/2" = 1' -0" Greenberghrrow 21 South Evergreen Avenue Suite 200 Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 t: 847.788.9200 COPYRIGHT NOTICE This drawinq is the property of the above referenced Professional and is not to be used for any purpose other than the specific project and site named herein, and cannot be reproduced in any manner without the express written permission from the Professional. ISSUE RECORD DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 07/22/2016 ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 08/23/2016 1 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 10/05/2016 3 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE FRANK GRIECO PROJECT MANAGER CHRIS CERBO QUALITY CONTROL JOHN NASHED DRAWN BY JAMES CONNAUGHTON PROJECT NAME I I ' VIN SCHERTZ, TX 78154 1 I�S S I R U C `I' Lb 18 E 1801 Rockdale Industrial Blvd. Conyers, Georgia 30012 Voice: (800) 366 -6385 Fax: (770) 483 -6037 FMS JOB NUMBER G16M000107 FMS MODEL NUMBER XXXXXX PROJECT NUMBER 20150472.0 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER PROTO V2.0 05/20/207 6 MTL C -3 0 io CV C) LO 0 v ih 0 STUCCO C -3 CO2 ENCLOSURE 8' -6 1/2" 22' -6 1/2" 15'-4" 46' -0" ----------- - - - - -- 101-81. 2'-3" 8' -10" --- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- — 91. 7 %4" 0 C'U J op BY FMS G (; -7 D -9 N � C -3 5 DOORS (EXTERIOR SIDE) AND DOOR FRAMES PAINTED BY FMS 6 LITHONIA REMOTE EMERGENCY HEAD #ELA SHEET El r a 3 'DORMER BROWN' SW #7521 � J 0 tV STUCCO 'SUMMIT GRAY' SW #7669 BY FMS C-5 BY FMS OPEN C -6 STUCCO 'REAL RED' SW #6868 BY FMS C-7___] O BY FMS C -$ COLOR TO MATCH 'WARM GREY' V933 (BY VIRACON) BY FMS 0 N T W N zo v ih 0 STUCCO C -3 CO2 ENCLOSURE 8' -6 1/2" 22' -6 1/2" 15'-4" 46' -0" ----------- - - - - -- 101-81. 2'-3" 8' -10" --- - - - - -- ------------ - - - - -- --------------------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- — 91. 7 %4" U 0 C'U J II N 11 II _ 11 II BY FMS 2 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM KAWNEER, YKK OR EQUAL (; -7 D -9 II 11 N �� N N U 0 C'U J NOT USED BY FMS 2 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM KAWNEER, YKK OR EQUAL (; -7 3 EXTERIOR LIGHTING, REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN SHEET El 4 4" x 4" PAINTED METAL CORRUGATED DOWNSPOUTS EMERGENCY SHUT -OFF SWITCH BY FME @ 48" AFF - - - -- FROST PROOF HOSE BIB ARROWHEAD BRASS PRODUCTS OR EQUAL @24" AFF MATERIAL AREA (BLDG FACADE) AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED PERCENTAGE PROVIDED - - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- - ______ -------- - - - - -- BRICK 142 SF 80% OF 434 SF = 347 SF 434 SF 100% STUCCO 292 SF GLAZING 198 SF 30% OF 632 SF = 190 SF 198 SF 31.3% TOTAL 632 SF (434 SF UN- GLAZED) KEYED NOTES: EXTERIOR FINISHES: 0 STUCCO STUCCO FINISH BY FMS NOT USED BY FMS 2 CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT SYSTEM KAWNEER, YKK OR EQUAL (; -7 3 EXTERIOR LIGHTING, REFER TO LIGHTING PLAN SHEET El 4 4" x 4" PAINTED METAL CORRUGATED DOWNSPOUTS C -3 5 DOORS (EXTERIOR SIDE) AND DOOR FRAMES PAINTED BY FMS 6 LITHONIA REMOTE EMERGENCY HEAD #ELA SHEET El 7 FAUX - WINDOW /SPANDREL GLAZING SYSTEM a 3 'DORMER BROWN' SW #7521 d 0 tV EXTERIOR FINISHES: STUCCO STUCCO FINISH BY FMS BRICK THIN BRICK BY FMS MTL 20 GA. SHEET METAL (UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE) BY FMS EXTERIOR PAINT /COLORS: C -1 THIN BRICK VENEER - PEBBLE BEACH VELOUR BY ENDICOTT (WIRE CUT FINISH) BY FMS C_2 THIN BRICK VENEER - EMPIRE IVORY VELOUR BY CAROLINA CERAMICS (WIRE CUT FINISH) BY FMS C -3 'DORMER BROWN' SW #7521 BY FMS Lc-4 STUCCO 'SUMMIT GRAY' SW #7669 BY FMS C-5 BY FMS OPEN C -6 STUCCO 'REAL RED' SW #6868 BY FMS C-7___] CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT BY FMS C -$ COLOR TO MATCH 'WARM GREY' V933 (BY VIRACON) BY FMS W i� CV Z') in ib ;0 'v 'v M 0 WINDOW HAS SECURITY SHUTTER - MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - SEE CLOSED POSITION DETAIL 4 /E1 LEFT ELEVATION 1/2" =1' -0" 30' -6" 9" 2'-3" 11' -5 1/2" ------- ----------- - - -- — 10' -1 1/2" STUCCO C -6 r . N II — -- - -- — - -- -- — -- -- — - -- - -- — -- -- — - -- -- — — -- — -- — — — $ N � N � N � N WINDOW AND DOOR HAS SECURITY SHUTTER CONCEALED IN THE AWNING AND TOWER - MODEL EX60 BY WHEATBELT - SEE CLOSED POSITION DETAIL 4/E2 0 2 FRONT ELEVATION NORTH 1/2" =1 -0 MATERIAL AREA (BLDG FACADE) AREA REQUIRED AREA PROVIDED PERCENTAGE PROVIDED BRICK 84 SF 80% OF 236 SF = 189 SF 236 SF 100% STUCCO 152 SF GLAZING 144 SF 30% OF 380 SF = 114 SF 144 SF 37.9% TOTAL 380 SF (236 SF UN- GLAZED) 1/2" V -1 1/2" STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 7 "X7" ACCESS COVER OVER 5 "X5" ACCESS OPENING. SEE DETAIL 5/E2 TAMPER PROOF SCREWS STUCCO C -3 STUCCO C -4 STUCCO C -6 12 GA. X 3" LOCKING BAR PAINTED TO MATCH DOOR U -BOLT (BY FMS) WITH LOCK (BY OTHERS) BRICK C -1 DOOR STOP, PROVIDED BY COOLER MANUFACTURER GRADE 0, 1/211 =1' -0" Greenberghrrow 21 South Evergreen Avenue Suite 200 Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 t: 847.788.9200 COPYRIGHT NOTICE This drawinq is the property of the above referenced Professional and is not to be used for any purpose other than the specific project and site named herein, and cannot be reproduced in any manner without the express written permission from the Professional. ISSUE RECORD DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 07/22/2016 ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 08/23/2016 1 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 10/05/2016 3 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE FRANK GRIECO PROJECT MANAGER CHRIS CERBO QUALITY CONTROL JOHN NASHED DRAWN BY JAMES CONNAUGHTON PROJECT NAME SCHERTZ, TX 78154 � � "1 - 1801 Rockdale Industrial Blvd. Conyers, Georgia 30012 Voice: (800) 366 -6385 Fax: (770) 483 -6037 FMS JOB NUMBER G16M000107 FMS MODEL NUMBER XXXXXX PROJECT NUMBER 20150472.0 SHEET TITLE EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER PROTO V2.0 05/20/207 6 BREAK IN PARAPET FOR ROOF ACCESS REAR ELEVATION 3/16" =1' -0" 8' -0" OPENING IN CANOPY DECK ABOVE RTU'S BREAK IN PARAPET FOR LADDER ACCESS SECTION THRU BUILDING /CANOPY 1/4" = 1' -0" BREAK IN PARAPET FOR LADDER ACCESS - - - - - -- --------- OPENINGS OVER ROOF TOP UNITS ROOF ACCESS OPENING Greenberghrrow 21 South Evergreen Avenue Suite 200 Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 t: 847.788.9200 COPYRIGHT NOTICE This drawinq is the property of the above referenced Professional and is not to be used for any purpose other than the specific project and site named herein, and cannot be reproduced in any manner without the express written permission from the Professional. ISSUE RECORD DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 08/23/2016 1 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 10/05/2016 3 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE FRANK GRIECO PROJECT MANAGER CHRIS CERBO QUALITY CONTROL JOHN NASHED DRAWN BY JAMES CONNAUGHTON PROJECT NAME MURPHY OIL CONVENIENCE 17601 FOUR OAKS LANE SCHERTZ, TX 78154 1801 Rockdale Industrial Blvd. Conyers, Georgia 30012 Voice: (800) 366 -6385 Fax: (770) 483 -6037 FMS JOB NUMBER G16M000107 FMS MODEL NUMBER XXXXXX PROJECT NUMBER 20150472.0 SHEET TITLE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ACCESS SHEET NUMBER i I II� PROTO V2.0 05/20/2016 149'-0" GRADE 0) - 0 1- 7 FRONT ELEVATION (NORTH 3/16" = V-0" I Kill] IN 110 FASCIA-2 149' - 0" MATERIAL AREA (CANOPY AREA AREA PERCENTAGE FACADE) REQUIRED PROVIDED PROVIDED BRICK 116 SF z O 898 SF 100% STUCCO 782 SF = 719 SF BOARD TO ZEE) TOTAL 898 SF ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------- rn W M 00 00 0) ti - - — ----- - ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- - FBASEJ SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS --------- --f ------- -_ - - — - ------ ---- - - - ------ ------------- - --------------------- - ------------- ------------------- FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS 'PEBBLE BEACH VELOUR' BRICK #6 X 3/4 GRIND OFFS ------ - ---------------------------------------------------------- — - STUBm-- SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS @ 24" O/C (ZEE TO TRIM) "PEBBLE BEACH #12 X 3/4" TEK SCREW 3CT1 (CUT TO FIT) 20 GAUGE &3L6U VELOUR" (ZEE TO MN) GALVANEAL CORNER TRIM PAINTED T "BRICK MATCH" COLUMN ENCLOSURE DETAIL BASE GRAY SW #7669 PAINTED BY SITE CONTRACTOR INFIELD - --- - --------------------------------------------------- - -------------------- -------------------- - --------------------- --- - - ----------------------- ------------------- - ----------- MATERIAL AREA (CANOPY AREA AREA PERCENTAGE FACADE) REQUIRED PROVIDED PROVIDED BRICK 116 SF 80% OF 898 SF 898 SF 100% STUCCO 782 SF = 719 SF BOARD TO ZEE) TOTAL 898 SF ------------------------------------ --------------------------------------- M 3/16" = V-0" 46' - 0" V-11 3/4" -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - #3Z3 - 20 GA 3 7/8" 114" 37/8" HORIZONTAL ZEE FASCIA-2] CORK(] co CD M LO J. 4 —/—r W z CLEAR SILICONE CAULK 101, X 101, :T C) W �ICOLUMN C) CO U) 4- �r- < LONG FASTENED BETWEEN PLYWOOD SCREW X 1 1/2" C0 C? BRICKS @ 24" O/C (GOLD = BOARD TO ZEE) 00 �5 ,,01 U') ------ - ------ ------- ] co #6 X 3/4 GRIND OFFS @ 24" O/C (ZEE TO TRIM) #12 X 3/4" TEK SCREW @ 36" O/Cl "EMPIRE IVORY #3CT1 (CUT TO FIT) 20 GAUGE (ZEE TO COLUMN) VELOUR" BY GALVANEAL CORNER TRIM PAINTED CAROLINA "BRICK MATCH" CERAMICS -COLUMN-ENCLOSURE--DETAIL 3/16" = V-0" MATERIAL AREA (CANOPY AREA AREA PERCENTAGE FACADE) REQUIRED PROVIDED PROVIDED BRICK 58 SF 80% OF 300 SF 300 SF 100% STUCCO 242 SF = 240 SF BOARD TO ZEE) TOTAL 300 SF M Jk GRADE 0 0) LEFT ELEVATION (EAS rn ih io < W U- 0 Z < J ;0 0 W Z MATERIAL AREA (CANOPY AREA AREA PERCENTAGE FACADE) REQUIRED PROVIDED PROVIDED BRICK 58 SF 80% OF 300 SF 300 SF 100% STUCCO 242 SF = 240 SF TOTAL 300 SF 9'-11 3/4" - ---- -- — 3116" = V-0" z <1 Q- W W N.T.S. F' (2) #10 3/4" LG. HEX HEADS PER JOINT #BP1 18 GA. SCRAP HAT ------------ ACM FASCIA PANELS -- ACM S - EAM DETAIL NP E N.T.S. #OR1 OUTRIGGER (TYP.) FIELD CUT, ROUTE & BEND THIS JOINT TO FIT 18 GA. SCRAP HAT CORNER TRIM 6 CORNER TRIM DETAIL �NPE N.T.S. 6 ------------------------- NP E 18 GA. SCRAP HAT #OR1 OUTRIGGER (TYP.) — 4" 1" ! - - - - - - - - - - 4" --- - - ------- -------------- 9'-9 1/2 -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECTION 'E' CORNER FASCIA DETAIL 1/4" =1' -0" I FASCIA-1 1 9 NP 2'--8" #3Z3 - 20 GA 3 7/8" 2'-0 1/4" 3 HORIZONTAL ZEE T-- -: :2- cl) F —f C0 Alit I-CLEAR SILICONE CAULK 08/23/2016 1 28 1/2" 101, X 101, -COLUMN PACKAGE co - 12" ZN 9 W U) V) PLYWOOD SCREW X 1 1/2" 7t < LONG FASTENED BETWEEN C? co ------------------ BRICKS C& 24" O/C (GOLD BOARD TO ZEE) 6" HT MASONRY STUCCO METAL ACCENT I FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS M 00 00 0) ti - - — ----- - ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- - FBASEJ SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS --------- --f ------- -_ - - — - ------ ---- - - - ------ ------------- - --------------------- - ------------- ------------------- FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS 'PEBBLE BEACH VELOUR' BRICK #6 X 3/4 GRIND OFFS ------ - ---------------------------------------------------------- — - STUBm-- SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS @ 24" O/C (ZEE TO TRIM) "PEBBLE BEACH #12 X 3/4" TEK SCREW 3CT1 (CUT TO FIT) 20 GAUGE &3L6U VELOUR" (ZEE TO MN) GALVANEAL CORNER TRIM PAINTED CORNICE ACM CORNICE "BRICK MATCH" COLUMN ENCLOSURE DETAIL BASE N.T.S. -,SIGN --,-SUPPORT -,DETAIL -----,- ELEVATIONS -,-l---&-2, N.T.S. 18 GA SCRAP HAT 1/8" 46'-0" FASCIA 18 GA. SCRAP HAT 18 GA. SCRAP HAT SIGN SUPPORT DETAIL ELEVATIONS 3 & 4 N.T.S. 9'-11 3/4" NOTE: ACTUAL SIGN LOCATIONS ARE SITE SPECIFIC AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE, SIGN SUPPORTS ARE PROVIDED AT EACH CORNER FINISH SCHEDULE 4 1/2" 08/23/2016 1 28 1/2" T-9" PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 12" 6" - 18 GA SCRAP HAT 1/8" 46'-0" FASCIA 18 GA. SCRAP HAT 18 GA. SCRAP HAT SIGN SUPPORT DETAIL ELEVATIONS 3 & 4 N.T.S. 9'-11 3/4" NOTE: ACTUAL SIGN LOCATIONS ARE SITE SPECIFIC AND SUBJECT TO CHANGE, SIGN SUPPORTS ARE PROVIDED AT EACH CORNER FINISH SCHEDULE ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 08/23/2016 1 ACM (ALUMINUM COMPOSITE MATERIAL) MASONRY STUCCO 'SUMMIT GRAY' FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 SW #7669 - - - - - - - - - ------ - ------------- ----------------------------------------- ACM (ALUMINUM COMPOSITE MATERIAL) MASONRY STUCCO'DIGNITY BLUE' FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS REVISED ELEVATIONS - -------- SW #6804 ---- — - ------------------------------------------------------- 20 GA. SHEET METAL 6" HT MASONRY STUCCO METAL ACCENT I FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS BAND'PURE WHITE' SW #7005 - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - COLUMNS SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS - ---- - - - - ----------------- - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- - ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 'EMPIRE IVORY VELOUR' BRICK FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS - - — ----- - ------------------------ ---------------------------------------- - FBASEJ SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS --------- --f ------- -_ - - — - ------ ---- - - - ------ ------------- - --------------------- - ------------- ------------------- FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS 'PEBBLE BEACH VELOUR' BRICK ------ - ---------------------------------------------------------- — - STUBm-- SEE STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS - ----------------------------- - - ---------------------- — ------------- — --------- - - --- ` -- -- — &I N S T A - L-L- -E --- D - BY FMS PAINTED'DORMER BROWN' SW #7521 FURNISHED I- ----- - --------- — ----- — ----------------- - - ---------- - ------------------------- - PAINTED BY SITE CONTRACTOR IN FIELD ------------------ — ----- — ----------- - -------------------- -- -------- ----- ---- - ------------- - ----- - ------------------------------ --------- - CORNICE ACM CORNICE 12" DECORATIVE CORNICE STUCCO'SUMMIT FURNISHED & INSTALLED BY FMS ------ — ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GRAY SW #7669 PAINTED BY SITE CONTRACTOR INFIELD - --- - --------------------------------------------------- - -------------------- -------------------- - --------------------- --- - - ----------------------- ------------------- - ----------- Greenberghrrow 21 South Evergreen Avenue Suite 200 Arlington Heights, Illinois 60005 t: 847.788.9200 COPYRIGHT NOTICE This drawing is the property of the above referenced Professional and is not to be used for any purpose other than the specific project and site named herein, and cannot be reproduced in any manner without the express written permission from the Professional. ISSUE RECORD DATE REV. DESCRIPTION 07/22/2016 ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 08/23/2016 1 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 09/14/2016 2 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE 10/05/2016 3 REVISED ELEVATIONS PACKAGE PROFESSIONAL SEAL PROFESSIONAL IN CHARGE FRANK GRIECO PROJECT MANAGER CHRIS CERBO QUALITY CONTROL JOHN NASHED DRAWN BY JAMES CONNAUGHTON PROJECT NAME ��uR7P SICHERTZ, TX 78154 Y-1 40SS FRI u .. T S T R U C T U R E 1801 Rockdale Industrial Blvd. Conyers, Georgia 30012 Voice: (800) 366-6385 Fax: (770) 483-6037 FMS JOB NUMBER G16MU00108 FMS MODEL NUMBER XXXXXX PROJECT NUMBER 20150472 SHEET TITLE ELEVATIONS SHEET NUMBER CNP E2 PROTO V2.0 05/20/2016 IRR. METER lu ®I iT C4;--- -r&F GF �v 4 «< ..,...,,, ..,,.. SAMPLE PORT t t { h fa >; „s<t ..: i :. :s s.,, <i „t.r ,: .: ,i, t m „7 „;.. , ✓:'7>,r,,f, s 1” , ., .,sxxxx. sssssiis.s sssssssss + + + + ++ iii. sssssss t: }:: ; : ,...,,. r4 , Fi r>..,. ,.i .,..,..,v ::. ..... ....::. .. s , ,.. ,:: Y , :f.ti , , , , , .:::: s. RIM 838.00 . rrr:v 1000 GAL. GREASE' TRAP INV. IN 830.95 (NW)(4” ) RIM 8 3 9.43 INV. OUT 830.95 (SE )(4 ») J a r Ilk, , Y , , SUMP' 831'.04 INV. IN 835.04 (SW)(4 ") EX. SSMH -1 INV. OUT F 834.87 (NE)(4 ") RIM 837.63 i INV. IN 830.27 (W)(4 ") INV. OUT 830.23 (SE)(8 ") DEWATERING OF EXCAVATION PIT AND ANCHORING OF UST's WILL BE NEEDED DUE TO EXISTING GROUNDWATER CONDITIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW RECOMMENDATION OF THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY UNITED CONSULTING DATED MARCH 21, 2016 OR LATEST REVISED COPY. GC RESPONSIBLE FOR BIDDING AND PERMIT METER SIZES UTILITY FEE SCHEDULE DOMESTIC: 1' WATER & SANITARY SEWER FEES TO BE PAID BY MURPHY: IRRIGATION: 1' WATER: E 10.269.00 IMPACT FEE $10,269.00 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER: $9,778.00 IMPACT FEE 200.00 INSPECTION FEE $11,778.00 TOTAL. UTILITY INSTALLATION RESPONSIBILITIES WATER SERVICE: • WATER COMPANY TO INSTALL DOMESTIC /IRRIGATION METERS. • CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL ALL WATER LINE APPURTENANCES UP TO METER. CONTRACTOR WILL ALSO PERFORM TAP. POWER SERVICE: ELECTRIC COMPANY PROVIDES SERVICE MATERIALS AND INSTALLS SERVICE LINES INCLUDING A TRANSFORMER UP TO THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER PAD. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SERVICE CONSTRUCTION FROM TRANSFORMER PAD TO BUILDING PER ELECTRIC COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE A CONCRETE TRANSFORMER PAD PER ELECTRIC COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. CONTRACTOR TO TRENCH AND INSTALL CONDUIT, ELECTRIC COMPANY TO PULL PRIMARY WIRE, CONTRACTOR TO BACK -FILL. NO CONSTRUCTION COST CHARGED BY ELECTRIC COMPANY. UTILITY CONTACT INFORMATION ELECTRIC GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 908 CURTISS AVE. SCHERTZ, TX 748154 PHONE: (210) 658 -7033 TELEPHONE AT &T 4119 BROADWAY 7TH FL, ROOM 713 SCHERTZ, TX 78154 CONTACT: RICHARD MARTINEZ PHONE: (210) 283 -1113 EMAIL: RX7953 ®ATT.COM WATER & SEWER CITY OF SCHERTZ PUBLIC WORKS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY, BLDG #1 SCHERTZ, TX 78154 CONTACT: JAMES HOOKS PHONE: (210) 619 -1800 EMAIL:JHOOKSOSCHERTZ.COM 1. THE MURPHY STATION WILL NOT DROP THE WAL -MART GREEN SPACE BELOW CITY REQUIREMENTS. 2. ALL PERMANENT TURF AREAS MUST BE SODDED. 3. GC TO ENSURE THAT TRAFFIC THROUGH MAIN WAL -MART DRIVES IS NOT INTERRUPTED AT ANY TIME DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. ENSURE A MINIMUM TEMPORARY LANE WIDTH OF 10' (EACH DIRECTION) IS AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES, FREE OF OBSTRUCTIONS TO VEHICLES. AT NO TIME SHALL THE CONSTRUCTION FENCE EXTEND INTO THE DRIVE MORE THAN 2' FROM THE FACE OF THE CURB OR DRIVE. 4. IF DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION ON SITE WILL INTERFERE WITH THE WAL -MART TRAFFIC FLOW OR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER'S TRAFFIC FLOW, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE WAL -MART CONSTRUCTION /STORE MANAGER AND /OR ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNER, TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACT ON TRAFFIC FLOW. TEMPORARY RE- ROUTING OF TRAFFIC IS TO BE ACCOMPLISHED BY USING DOT APPROVED TRAFFIC BARRICADES, BARRELS, AND /OR CONES. TEMPORARY SIGNAGE AND FLAGMEN MAY BE ALSO NECESSARY. 5. ALL WAL -MART PROPERTY DAMAGED DUE TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES MUST BE REPLACED /RESTORED TO MATCH THE EXISTING TYPE AND QUALITY OF WORK AND MATERIALS, AND IS SUBJECT TO WAL -MART APPROVAL. 6. UTILITY WORK DONE ON WAL -MART PARCEL, WHETHER BY THE GC, CITY OR THE UTILITY COMPANIES, SHALL BE REPAIRED BACK TO EXISTING CONDITIONS. 7. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES IMPLEMENTED INSIDE THE WAL -MART DRIVE ISLES AND PARKIN LOT SHALL INCLUDE ONLY SILT BAGS (OR WAL -MART PRE - APPROVED EQUAL) TO ENSURE TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IS NOT IMPEDED. GRAVEL INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHAD. NOT BE ALLOWED INSIDE THE WAL -MART DRIVE ISLES OR PARKIN LOT. 8. GC SHALL UTILIZE DIRECTIONAL- BORING OR JACK AND BORE METHODS TO INSTALL ALL UTILITIES THROUGH THE WAL -MART PARKING LOT, ANY PAVED AREAS OR DRIVE ISLES. Ief�CF;E roc i SO Up � RS\X ENE C AFL 0 20' 30' 40' SCALE IN FEET LEGEND EXISTING = UTILITY POLE = PAINTED TRAFFIC STRIPE = BOLLARD P.R. = PLAT RECORDS = LIGHT POLE O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORDS = WATER METER = TRAFFIC FLOW DIRECTION (NOT PAINTED) = WATER VAL VE = CLEANOUT = SPOT ELEVATION = STREET SIGN = SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE = STORM DRAIN MANHOLE = CONCRETE PAVEMENT = WOOD FENCE = UNDERGROUND WATER LINE(AS MARKED BY UTILITY) = SANITARY SEWER LINE = UNDERGROUND ELEC. LINE(AS MARKED BY UTILITY) = UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE(PER CEI SURVEY) = UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC CABLE(PER CEI SURVEY) = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE = UNDERGROUND GAS LINE(PER CEI SURVEY) = CONTOUR LINE WITH ELEVATION = CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER PROPOSED LEGEND GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A. ALL BUILDING WATER LINES FROM METER TOWARDS BUILDING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC, MEETING ASTM D1785 & D2665 SPECIFICATIONS, AND SHALL BE RATED FOR USE WITH POTABLE WATER PER NSF STD. 61 & STD.14 , WITH 36" MIN. COVER. B. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY PROVIDE 36 MINIMUM COVER. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANY DISRUPTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. D. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNATED UTILITY COMPANIES. E. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT START ON ANY PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. F. PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF OR CONNECTION TO ANY STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN OR ANY OTHER UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, VERIFY AND CALCULATE ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND INFORM GREENBERGFARROW ENGINEERS AND THE OWNER /DEVELOPER OF ANY CONFLICT OR REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM OF (72) HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEER AND ITS CLIENTS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO MAKE SUCH NOTIFICATION. G. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY COMPLETELY WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS OF OSHA DIRECTIVES OR ANY OTHER AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SUPPORT SYSTEMS, SLOPING, BENCHING AND OTHER MEANS OF PROTECTION. THIS IS TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED FOR ACCESS AND EGRESS FROM ALL EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY OSHA. Q UTILITY BOUNDARY LINE SAN> SANITARY SEWER SERVICE UE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE T UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE SERVICE 1 -1 /4" *- WATER SERVICE CF CONSTRUCTION FENCE (SEE CIVIL DETAILS) CFP CONSTRUCTION FENCE ON PAVEMENT GENERAL UTILITY NOTES A. ALL BUILDING WATER LINES FROM METER TOWARDS BUILDING SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC, MEETING ASTM D1785 & D2665 SPECIFICATIONS, AND SHALL BE RATED FOR USE WITH POTABLE WATER PER NSF STD. 61 & STD.14 , WITH 36" MIN. COVER. B. ALL SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE SCHEDULE 40 PVC UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED BY THE UTILITY COMPANY PROVIDE 36 MINIMUM COVER. C. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ANY DISRUPTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES WITH ADJACENT PROPERTY OWNERS. D. ALL ELECTRIC AND TELEPHONE EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE DESIGNATED UTILITY COMPANIES. E. CONSTRUCTION SHALL NOT START ON ANY PUBLIC UTILITY SYSTEM UNTIL WRITTEN APPROVAL HAS BEEN RECEIVED BY THE ENGINEER FROM THE APPROPRIATE GOVERNING AUTHORITY AND CONTRACTOR HAS BEEN NOTIFIED BY THE ENGINEER. F. PRIOR TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF OR CONNECTION TO ANY STORM DRAIN, SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN OR ANY OTHER UTILITIES, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL EXCAVATE, VERIFY AND CALCULATE ALL POINTS OF CONNECTION AND ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS AND INFORM GREENBERGFARROW ENGINEERS AND THE OWNER /DEVELOPER OF ANY CONFLICT OR REQUIRED DEVIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. NOTIFICATION SHALL BE MADE A MINIMUM OF (72) HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ENGINEER AND ITS CLIENTS SHALL BE HELD HARMLESS IN THE EVENT THAT THE CONTRACTOR FAILS TO MAKE SUCH NOTIFICATION. G. CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY COMPLETELY WITH THE LATEST STANDARDS OF OSHA DIRECTIVES OR ANY OTHER AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION FOR EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING PROCEDURES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE SUPPORT SYSTEMS, SLOPING, BENCHING AND OTHER MEANS OF PROTECTION. THIS IS TO INCLUDE, BUT NOT LIMITED FOR ACCESS AND EGRESS FROM ALL EXCAVATION AND TRENCHING. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AS REQUIRED BY OSHA. Q UTILITY NOTES 22A POINT OF CONNECTION - WATER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES) 22D M.J. TEE WITH THRUST BLOCKING (SEE SIZES THIS SHEET) 22L METERED DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ENTRY. 22M PROPOSED WATER METER (SEE SIZE THIS SHEET) 23A POINT OF CONNECTION - SANITARY SEWER SERVICE (PER LOCAL CODES) 23E SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ENTRY (PER ARCH. PLANS) 23L CONNECT GREASE TRAP VENT TO BUILDING VENT SYSTEM. GREASE TRAP VENT INVERT MUST BE HIGHER THAN INLET INVERT. 24A POINT OF CONNECTION FOR UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SERVICE. 26A POINT OF CONNECTION FOR UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE. 29A MAINTAIN MIN. 18' VERTICAL SEPARATION. 30D VERIFY LOCATION AND DEPTH OF EXISTING UTILITY BEFORE CONSTRUCTING ua MM W PROPOSED UTILITY 31D INSTALL (2) 4" PVC SLEEVES 30' BELOW FINAL GRADE UNDER DRIVEWAY. EXTEND SLEEVES 2 FEET BEYOND BACK OF PROPOSED CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. STAKE BOTH ENDS OF EACH SLEEVE WITH CAPPED VERTICAL PVC PIPE, 12" ABOVE GRADE. DO NOT ALLOW SOIL OR WATER TO ENTER SLEEVES DURING OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION. 31E INSTALL (1) 4” PVC SLEEVE 30' BELOW FINAL GRADE UNDER DRIVEWAY FOR IRRIGATION LINE. EXTEND SLEEVE 2 FEET BEYOND BACK OF PROPOSED CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT. STAKE BOTH ENDS OF SLEEVE WITH CAPPED VERTICAL PVC PIPE, 12" ABOVE GRADE. DO NOT ALLOW SOIL OR WATER TO ENTER SLEEVE DURING OR AFTER CONSTRUCTION. ❑ UTILITY DETAILS — SEE DETAIL SHEETS 39G SANITARY SEWER GREASE TRAP 40B SANITARY SEWER WYE CONNECTION 40C SANITARY SEWER CLEAN -OUT 41G REDUCED PRESSURE ZONE BACKFLOW PREVENTER. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TYPE (ABOVE /UNDERGROUND) PRIOR TO COMMENCING CONSTRUCTION. SEE DETAIL THIS SHEET 0 TW y • � (f� J � Q Q r J Q 0 0 O i 0 J U W � z W Q coo 00 k C� U no QxQ W Q o ro I - �� 0 O 0 . O 0 —I 74\, l a I Oki 0 ON E-+ C�t1610 O c x U Od w ua MM W w ¢ ¢o z� 0 0 O i 0 J U W � z W Q coo 00 k C� U no QxQ W Q o ro I - �� 0 O 0 . O 0 —I 74\, l a I Oki