Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
02-28-2017 Revised & Amended Agenda with backup
REVISED AMENDED MEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL February 28, 2017 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 Policy Values Economic Prosperity Fiscally Sustainable High Quality of Life Safe Community Essential Services Attractive Community Call to Order — Regular Session Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Thompson) Presentntinnc • Presentation and briefing regarding the Historical Preservation Committee Annual Report. (B. James/D. Weirtz) City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Workshop • Discussion, summary and recommendations regarding the Schertz Incentive Policy. (K. Kinateder) • Discussion and update regarding quiet zones. (D. Wait /D. Letbetter) Hearing of Residents 02 -28 -2017 Council Agenda This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember. 1. Minutes — Consideration and /or action regarding the approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 14, 2017, and minutes of the Special Meeting of February 21, 2017. Q. Kessel /B. Dennis) 2. Ordinance No. 17 -M -10 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance amending the City of Schertz Code of Ordinances Chapter 24, Article 11, Food Establishments, Section 34 -22, regarding the adoption of the Texas Food and Beverage Establishment rule. First Reading (D. Wait /M. Harris /J. Hamilton) Discussion and Action Items 3. Ordinance No. 17 -S -01 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action PH approving an amendment to the Crossvine PDD in order to incorporate a new Garden Home configuration in Module IIA, along with new street cross - sections and other associated development standards. The property is approximately 375 acres of land located at the intersection of Lower Seguin Road and FM 1518. (Final reading) (B. James /L. Wood/C. Gould) 4. Resolution No. 17 -R -11 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the acceptance of the 2016 Racial Profiling Report. (D. Wait /M. Hansen) 5. Resolution No. 17 -R -15 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing a First Amendment to the Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract between Schertz- Sequin Local Government Corporation and the San Antonio Water System. (D. Wait) 6. Resolution No. 17 -R -16— Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing contracts with Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc., totaling no more than 02 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 2 $195,000 for the Main Street Improvement Project during the 2016 -17 Fiscal Year. (B. James) 7. Resolution No. 17 -R -12 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution approving a list of brokers for use by the City of Schertz. (B. James /J. Walters) 8. Resolution No. 17 -R -13 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution designating Investment Officers for the City of Schertz. (B. James /J. Walters) 9. Resolution No. 17 -R -14 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action approving the semi - annual report for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 and PH April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016, evaluating the progress of the City on achieving the Capital Improvements Program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. (B. James /J. Walters) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Requests and Announcements 10. Announcements by City Manager. 11. Future Agenda Item Request for City Council: This is an opportunity for City Council members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. No discussion of the merits of the item may be taken at this time. Should a Council Member oppose placement of the requested item on a future agenda, the Mayor, without allowing discussion, shall ask for the consensus of the other City Council members to place or not place the item on a future agenda. 12. Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers Executive Session 13. City Council will meet in closed session under section 551.074 of the Texas Government Code, Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager. Reconvene into Regular Session 13a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 13. Adiournment 02 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 3 - CERTIFICATION I, BRENDA DENNIS, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 25" DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 AT 10:30 A.M. WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. greKJn �eK.w'LS Brenda Dennis, City Secretar I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON DAY OF 2017. Title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 210 - 619 -1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Carpenter Councilmember Davis— Place 1 Audit Committee Schertz Housing Authority Board Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Interview Committee for Boards and Investment Advisory Committee Commissions TIRZ II Board Councilmember Gutierrez — Place 2 Councilmember Larson — Place 3 02 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 4 - Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards — Place 4 Councilmember Thompson — Place 5 Audit Committee Audit Committee Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation Councilmember Kiser — Place 6 Councilmember Crawford — Place 7 Schertz Animal Services Advisory Commission Schertz- Seguin Local Government Corporation Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions 02 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 5 - MEMORANDUM City Council: Department: Subject: BACKGROUND Agenda No. Workshop February 26, 2017 Economic Development Schertz Incentive Policy The Schertz Incentive Policy (the "Policy ") replaces Ordinance No. 14 -T -44 which established the City's Chapter 380 program and guidelines for the City of Schertz Economic Development Corporation (the "SEDC "). The proposed Policy provides a unified approach for business retention and attraction by the City of Schertz and the SEDC. The policy clarifies the difference between the incentives offered by the City and the SEDC and establish parameters for when each program will be used. The policy places greater demand on the SEDC for economic development incentives while providing alignment with the council for the strategic use of SEDC funds. The Policy has three major programs: The Assistance Center, SEDC Incentive Policy, and Chapter 380 Incentive Policy. The first two programs are managed by the SEDC and utilize SEDC funds. The Chapter 380 Incentive Policy utilizes the City's General Fund. PURPOSEOPOSE The purpose of the workshop is to review the SEDC programs (the Assistance Center and SEDC Incentive Policy) and to ensure that they align with the direction of the City Council. The Council will also discuss the City's Chapter 380 Incentive Policy and consider the recommendation set forth by the SEDC. Staff will collect input and make any necessary adjustments. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The proposed Policy was discussed and approved with the current changes by the SEDC Board of Directors during their Regular Monthly Meeting held on January 26th as follows: A Motion to approve the Schertz Incentive Policy and present to City Council for their review was made by Mr. R. Richard. Seconded by Mr. P. Macaluso. Motion passed unanimously. FISCAL IMPACT There are no immediate expenditures associated with the approval of the Policy. All future incentives will be review by the SEDC and City Council and approved at their discretion. ATTACHMENTS Formatted: Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Schertz Incentive Policy SCHERTZ INCENTIVE POLICY All economic development opportunities are encouraged to visit with the Economic Development Department to see how they fit into the overall efforts of creating a stronger business community. This policy is intended to act as a guideline for economic development incentives, specific Project details and amounts will be determined by the positive economic impacts created for the City of Schertz. Purpose The Schertz Incentive Policy has been created to increase job opportunities, add taxable value, create high quality of life, and diversify our local economy. The Schertz Incentive Policy will guide and ensure consistency between the City Council, the SEDC Board of Directors, and the Economic Development Department when engaging new and expanded business activities within the City of Schertz and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. Organizations Affected The City Council, SEDC Board of Directors, City Manager's office and Economic Development Department. Definitions Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement — formalized written agreement between the City of Schertz and a Company named to reflect the authorizing statute found in Chapter 380 of the Texas Local Government Code. Chapter 380 Incentive Agreements enact incentives authorized by the City of Schertz Chapter 380 Incentive Policy as defined in Section 3 of the Policy. City of Schertz Economic Development Corporation — abbreviated "SEDC" is a Texas, non - profit industrial development corporation. City Staff — Includes employees of all city departments. Company —a business enterprise. Economic Development Department — Under the Direction of the City Manager, the Executive Director and department staff are responsible for all economic development activities of the SEDC. Administrative expenses will be paid by the SEDC through the "Agreement For Provision Of Professional Services Between The City of Schertz and the Schertz Economic Development Corporation" which will be approved annually. Development Fee Grant — incentive for all or part of the fees paid to the City of Schertz in connection for a new or expanded business location. A Development Fee Grant is awarded by the SEDC through a Performance Agreement. Infrastructure Grant — incentive for infrastructure improvements which shall be limited to: streets and roads, rail spurs, water and sewer utilities, electric utilities, or gas utilities, drainage, site improvements, and related improvements; telecommunications and internet improvements. An Infrastructure Grant is awarded by the SEDC through a Performance Agreement. Performance Agreement — formalized written agreement between the SEDC and a Company. The Performance Agreement must include: a schedule of additional payroll or jobs to be created or retained and capital investment to be made as consideration for direct incentives provided or Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 1 of 7 expenditures made by the SEDC under the agreement; and the terms under which repayment must be made if the Company does not meet the performance requirements specified in the agreement. Performance Grant — a one time or multiyear incentive given in consideration for the creation or retention of Primary Jobs. A Performance Grant is awarded by the SEDC through a Performance Agreement. Primary Jobs — defined by Chapter 501 of the Texas Local Government Code: (A) a job that is: (i) available at a company for which a majority of the products or services of that company are ultimately exported to regional, statewide, national, or international markets infusing new dollars into the local economy; and (ii) included in one of the following sectors of the North American Industry Classification System (NAICS): 111 Crop Production 112 Animal Production 113 Forestry and Logging 11411 Commercial Fishing 115 Support Activities for Agriculture and 211 -213 221 311 -339 42 48 -49 51 (excluding 512131 and 512132) 523 -525 5413, 5415, 5416, 5417, and 5419 551 56142 922140 Forestry Mining Utilities Manufacturing Wholesale Trade Transportation and Warehousing Information (excluding motion picture theaters and drive -in motion picture theaters) Securities, Commodity Contracts, and Other Financial Investments and Related Activities; Insurance Carriers and Related Activities; Funds, Trusts, and Other Financial Vehicles Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services; Computer System Design and Related Services; Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services; Scientific Research and Development Services; Other Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services Management of Companies and Enterprises Telephone Call Centers Correctional Institutions Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 2 of 7 (B) a job that is included in North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) sector number 928110, National Security, for the corresponding index entries for Armed Forces, Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps, and Military Bases. Project — defined in Chapters 501 and 505 of the Texas Local Government Code. Real and Personal Property Investment Grant — a one time or multiyear incentive given in consideration for an increase in the Total Taxable value and the ventures overall positive economic impacts to the City of Schertz. The Real and Personal Property Investment Grant is awarded by the City of Schertz through a Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement. Sales and Use Tax Grant — a one time or multiyear incentive given in consideration for gross retail sales and use tax that is subject to local collection and the company's overall positive economic impacts to the City of Schertz. The Sales and Use Tax Grant is awarded by the City of Schertz though the Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement. Small Business Grant — a one time or multiyear incentive given in consideration for the creation or retention of Primary Jobs or new Total Taxable Value. A Small Business Grant is proportionally greater than a Performance Grant; however, the overall amount is not as large. A Small Business Grant is awarded by the SEDC through a Performance Agreement. Total Taxable Value — Includes Real Property (land and improvements) and Tangible Personal Property (machinery and equipment, inventory) as found on the official county appraisal district tax roll. Background The City of Schertz, Texas and the SEDC are focused on growing our local economy through the attraction and retention of Primary Jobs and by attracting new capital investment throughout the City of Schertz and within its extraterritorial jurisdiction. Since the City of Schertz' incorporation in 1958, Schertz has grown rapidly utilizing various tools to promote economic development. On August 9, 1997, Schertz residents voted to establish the SEDC and to collect one -half of one percent of sales tax to be used for economic development. Over the past 20 years, the City of Schertz and the SEDC have partnered to bring about multiple projects that have benefited the residents of Schertz. The partnership involved leveraging incentive tools such as abatements, rebates, grants and loans to strategically invest in infrastructure for our industrial parks, create loans for emerging industries, and to provide grants for both small and large companies who made significant capital investment within our City and created jobs for our residents. Today, the City of Schertz and the SEDC continue to present a partnered approach towards economic development; however, as we move forward greater focus will be placed on utilizing SEDC resources for economic development incentives to ensure that City resources are utilized for basic city services and quality of life amenities. Through this practice, our community will have greater ability to achieve the Schertz Complete City Model which includes the simultaneous accomplishment of the three key areas: Economic Engine, Core Services and Quality of Life. Programs Under the direction of the City Manager, the Economic Development Department will implement the following initiatives and processes. Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 3 of 7 1. Assistance Center— Information is critical to making business decisions. The Assistance Center is a collection of resources needed to learn more about the Schertz market, find the best location, start or expand a business, lower operating costs, or connect with area partners. The Assistance Center is a free resource available to new and expanded businesses seeking to pursue a Project within the City of Schertz and its extraterritorial jurisdiction. The information will be available online at www.schertzedc.com or by contacting the Economic Development Department. The Assistance Center consists of the following: a. Site Selection Data — local Schertz information used to make preliminary site decisions. i. Market Information — aerial imagery, demographic reports, consumer spending, labor trends, traffic counts, education attainment, and other datasets to better understand the Schertz market. ii. Available Property Information — Commercial real estate listings. iii. Utility Information — water, wastewater, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications capacity, availability and rate information. iv. Tax Information — local property and sales tax breakdowns. b. Schertz Development Assistance — development and business codes for constructing and opening a business in Schertz. i. Local Development Codes — reference library to Schertz Unified Development Codes, building and fire codes. ii. Development Guide — general procedural overview for opening a business in Schertz. iii. Predevelopment Meetings — a preliminary meeting and review of development and construction documents by the Engineering, Fire, GIS, Marshal, Parks, Planning & Community Development, and Public Works departments to ensure a quicker permit review timeline. c. Existing Local Tax Exemptions — a list of local tax exemptions that are available to lower business operating costs in Schertz. Freeport Exemption - a property tax exemption by the local jurisdiction on inventory that is detained in Texas less than 175 days. Properties within Schertz are entitled to a triple freeport exemption because of the participation by the City of Schertz, the County and the School District. The following jurisdictions participate in the Freeport Exemption: City of Schertz, Bexar County, Comal County, Guadalupe County, Comal ISD, and SCUC ISD. (Texas Tax Code Chapters 11.251 ii. Manufacturing Exemption — a state and local sales tax exemption on leased or purchased machinery, equipment, replacement parts, and accessories that are used or consumed in the manufacturing, processing, fabricating, or repairing of tangible personal property for ultimate sale. Additionally, Texas businesses are exempt from paying state sales and use tax on labor for constructing new facilities. (Texas Tax Code Chapters 151:318 iii. Natural Gas & Electricity Exemption — companies that use over 50% of their electricity or natural gas consumption in manufacturing, processing, or Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 4 of 7 fabricating tangible personal property are exempt from paying state and local sales and use tax on electricity and natural gas. (Texas Tax Code Section 151:318, 151:3185 d. Partner Resources — Alamo area partners that can help create, grow and improve your business. i. Local Chamber of Commerce — Schertz has multiple regional chambers serving our area which help support their members through training and networking opportunities. ii. Regional, State and Federal Programs — list of governmental programs to assist entrepreneurs, small businesses, non - profits, and industry specific organizations develop business plans, access new markets and obtain financing for new product lines. iii. Trade Organizations — created to help that assist businesses and owner's network, advocate and gain industry specific education. 2. SEDC Incentive Policy — On August 9, 1997, Schertz residents voted to establish the City of Schertz Economic Development Corporation and for the collection of one -half of one percent of sales tax to be used for eligible economic development Projects. The SEDC was established as a Type B corporation under the Development Corporation Act, as amended (Title 12, Subtitle C1, Texas Local Government Code), and other applicable laws. The SEDC is governed by Chapter 501, 502 and 505 of the Local Government Code which give cities the discretionary ability to finance new and expanded business enterprises. The SEDC can fund all allowable Projects that are authorized for a Type B corporation. The Economic Development Department is responsible for identifying Projects and their economic impacts to the community. The SEDC Board of Directors is responsible for making a finding that a Projects and programs are within the constraints of the law. The City Council is responsible for authorizing all programs and expenditures for the SEDC. The SEDC Board of Directors and City Council will utilize all tools authorized by Chapters 501, 502 and 505 of the Texas Local Government Code to structure performance based incentives. Additionally, the following categories and guidelines will be used to consider individual Projects: a. Company Direct Incentives — in connection with the creation and retention of Primary Jobs, the SEDC will evaluate companies under the following categories: i. Existing Businesses — a business with at least 5 years of operation within the City of Schertz or its extraterritorial jurisdiction may receive a Performance Grant and Development Fee Grant to help create or retain Primary jobs in Schertz and to encourage new capital investment. ii. Small Businesses — a business with fewer than 50 full -time jobs or annual sales less than $10 million that seeks to establish or expand operations in Schertz may receive a Small Business Grant. Each year, the SEDC will budget $500 thousand to be used exclusively for Small Business Grants. iii. Large Impact Businesses — a business that seeks to create Primary Jobs and increase the Total Taxable Value in order to maintain and diversify our local Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 5 of 7 economy may receive a Performance Grant. A Performance Grant will be used exclusively for all Projects with a Total Taxable Value of up to $100 million. iv. Extra Large Impact Businesses — for those Projects that exceed a Total Taxable Value over $100 million, the City and SEDC will use a combination of a Performance Grant and a Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement to leverage the creation of new Primary Jobs and Total Taxable Value. b. Infrastructure Incentives — Certain infrastructure improvements, such as streets and roads for retail or office developments, may qualify for an Infrastructure Grant if the infrastructure expenditures adheres to state law and are found by the Board of Directors to be necessary to promote or develop new or expanded business enterprises. c. Other Authorized Projects — The SEDC retains its right to utilize any Project authorized for Type B Corporations. All Projects will be subject to the execution of a Performance Agreement. 3. Chapter 380 Incentive Policy— in accordance with Chapter 380.001 of the Texas Local Government Code, the governing body of a municipality may establish and provide for the administration of a program to promote state or local economic development and to stimulate business and commercial activity in the municipality. Chapter 380 Incentive Agreements allow for the provision of loans and grants of city funds, as well as use of City Staff, city facilities or city services, at minimal or no charge. Under the direction of the City Manager, City Staff is responsible for the administration of the Chapter 380 Incentive Policy. City Staff will identify ventures that align with the policy and demonstrate the positive economic impacts that will be created. The SEDC Board of Directors will review Chapter 380 Incentive Agreements and make recommendations to the City Council on the venture's overall ability to positively impact the City's economic conditions. Chapter 380 Incentive Agreements will be approved by resolution at the sole discretion of the City Council by a majority vote. For best practice, Chapter 380 Incentive Agreements should be used in combination with an SEDC Performance Agreement incentive. Additionally, the City of Schertz prefers to continue the practice of utilizing performance based tools such as abatement /rebates over other tools; however, the City Council retains its ability to utilize every tool available. The City Council must find that a Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement meets the following program guidelines: a. Real & Personal Property Investment — Ventures that create a minimum of $100 million in new Total Taxable Value may qualify to receive a Real & Personal Property Investment Grant. b. Gross Sales and Use Tax — Retail ventures that create a minimum of $35 million in gross retail sales, that is subject to local sales and use tax collection, may receive a Sales and Use Tax Grant. Incentive Process Incentives are used on a discretionary basis to stimulate economic development and create a positive economic impact for the City of Schertz. Prior to the purchase of property, execution of a lease, or submittal of a permit for an expansion a Company must execute a Performance Agreement or a Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement. Additionally, within 30 days of the execution of Performance Agreement or Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 6 of 7 Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement, the Company will be required to provide documentation of their commitment to proceed. The following is an outline of the incentive process: 1. The Company will contact the Economic Development Department to discuss and review possible incentive programs. The Company will provide basic Project information such as the number of jobs, anticipated capital investment, project timeline, and demonstrate the positive economic impacts of the project. 2. The Economic Development Department will complete an impact analysis for the Project and /or venture. 3. As appropriate, The Economic Development Department will meet with the SEDC Board of Directors and /or City Council in executive session to deliberate potential economic development negotiations. 4. The Economic Development Department will submit a preliminary incentive offer to the Company. 5. The Economic Development Department will draft a Performance Agreement and /or Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement with the specified terms. The agreement will be submitted to the Company for execution. 6. The SEDC Board of Directors and /or the City Council will meet in open session to execute the SEDC Performance Agreement and /or Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement. 7. Once the Performance Agreement and /or Chapter 380 Incentive Agreement is in place, the Economic Development Department will monitor the Company's compliance and continued success in Schertz. '"%� 1-1� Open Meetings Act and Public Information Act The City of Schertz and the SEDC are subject to the Texas Open Meetings Act and the Public Information Act. The City and SEDC will to the extent allowed by law, keep all Company information and documentation confidential. In the event that an information request is made, the City and SEDC will make a good faith effort to notify the Company so that an appeal can be made to the Attorney General of Texas to withhold information. (Texas Government Code Chapters 551; 552) Updated: February 13, 2017 Page 7 of 7 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Subject: BACKGROUND City Secretary Minutes Agenda No. 1 The City Council held a Regular meeting on February 14, 2017 and the Special Meeting of February 21, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of February 14, 2017 and the Special meeting of February 21, 2017. ATTACHMENTS Regular Meeting of February 14, 2017 and Special Meeting of February 21, 2017. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING February 14, 2017 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on February 14, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James Assistant to the City Manager Sarah Gonzalez Deputy City Secretary Donna Schmoekel Call to Order – City Council Regular Session Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to order at 6:01 Mayor Pro -Tern Cedric Edwards Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Robin Thompson Councilmember Bert Crawford City Manager John Kessel Executive Director Dudley Wait City Attorney Jameene Banks Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards) �r Mayor Carpenter provided the opening prayer fo d by the ges of allegiance to the flags of the United States and the State of Texas. Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards arrived at 6 :02 p.m. on the dais. Proclamatio —4ft 9 clamation recognizing George Washington's Birthday. (Mayor /Council /Louis Segaloff) Mayor Carpenter read and presented the proclamation to the following recipients: Mr. Louis Segaloff, Mrs. Joyce O. Segaloff, and Mr. Thomas "Tom" Jones. Mayor Carpenter spoke stating the actual vote was taken on July 2, 1776, although it reads in Congress July 4, 1776. History tells us that after the vote was taken our founding fathers all stood there in silence for several minutes, in awe of what they had done. They had all just agreed to pledge their lives and honor, fortunes and families – they all committed an act of treason that day against their lawful government. This was no small undertaking and took extraordinary courage. He hopes that day that they dreamed that their children and children's children would one day do what we do here today – to come together peaceably and as a community choose how to govern ourselves. It was a great gift, from George Washington and all those like him. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - i - Presentations • Presentation and recognition of retired K -9 Rambo and introducing our new K -9 Medor. (D. Wait /M. Hansen/M. Bane) As the K -9 officers were unavailable this evening, the item was pulled. City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) Mayor Carpenter recognized Assistant to the City Manager Sarah onzalez who provided the following announcements: • Wednesday, February 15 Fire Department Awards Banquet, 6:30 p.m. Schertz Civic Center • Thursday, February 16 Chamber Mixer Hosted by Cruise Planners at 5:30 p.m. -7:00 p.m. The Chamber and Visitors Center • Monday, February 20 Presidents Day - City offices closed. • Tuesday, February 21 Chamber Luncheon, 11:30 a.m. at the Schertz Civic Center, "State of the Cities Address ". City Council On- The -Go Town Hall Meeting, 6:30 p.m., Ray Corbett Jr. High, 1200 Ray Corbett Drive. • Saturday, February 25 Operation Comfort 5K and Kids Freedom Fun Run 9:00 a.m., Bluebonnet Palace, registration is at 6:30 a.m. — Commemorating the 7th Annual salute to our service members. • Tuesday, February 28 City Council Meeting, Council Chambers, 6:00 p.m. • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Mayor Carpenter recognized City Manager John Kessel who spoke about three Valentine Day awards for staff. The first award is for teamwork regarding a large hole in the pavement and had been unrepaired for quite a while. Eddie Diggs from Public Works was commended by a grateful citizen but he in turn gave full credit to his co- workers. The second award is for the City itself. We have a program called Smart Dollars (a Dave Ramsey online course) provided to the staff (free of charge) so they can get better with their finances — currently there is a 32% participation rate of all city employees. He hopes to see that percentage increase in the next coming weeks. The third Valentine award is a STRAC award for our EMS, which is due to our quick response time to heart attack calls. We are receiving an award this week and are in competition with San Antonio, New Braunfels, and all of the different urban EMS systems in the region. Schertz had the fastest average for the whole calendar year 2016 with a new record for us of 12.6 minutes per call. This is due to all the training they have had. This kind of training and performance does save lives. He congratulated EMS Director Jason Mabbit and his response teams. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - Hearing of Residents • Mr. Glen Outlaw, 3729 Forsyth Park, who thanked city staff for their prompt attention to his request to start putting the council videos online on the city website. They have also now decided to put the Planning and Zoning meetings out there as well. He also commended the City for offering a financial planning program again and availing it to staff members. • Mr. Danny Sale, 3812 Hunters Glen, who stated one of the better things he ever saw was the City of Kingsville working with their recycle partners, which ultimately resulted in a positive revenue situation for them by providing a location and employee for residents to bring their recycle and then the City reusing good intact cardboard items and saving the landfill from getting filled up so fast. Another item he spoke of was in regards to the FM 1103 road which has some debris build up in one area which is causing some water backup issues. • Mr. Grumpy Azzoz, 528 Wayward Pass, who spoke of seeing a city worker on February 8 at approximately 11:55 a.m. on FM 3009 and Ashley Place. He appeared to be working alone on a pothole and there were no visible safety lights on the city vehicle flashing or caution signs displayed. He felt this was an endangering situation for the staff member. He was very concerned for his safety. He also spoke about Resolution 17 -R -07 stating he saw that we are going to use the same company as our Construction Risk Manager for Fire Station No. 3 that we used to oversee the construction of the animal shelter. Why are we seeking someone so far outside the San Antonio area and pay all those expenses? We need to consider how we are spending the taxpayer's money. As you address this item later, please think about this. Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember. 1. Minutes — Consideration an1(. K n regarding the approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of February 7, 2017. Kessel /B. Dennis) 2. Boards, Commissions and Committee Member Appointments /Resignations — Consideration and /or action ratifying the resignations of Ms. Mireille Ferdinand - Hercule as a regular member of EDC and Mr. Dave Reynolds as a regular member of the Committee of Committees Advisory Board and consideration and/or action appointing Mr. Don Taylor to the Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee. (B. Dennis/Mayor /Council) 3. Ordinance No. 17 -S -07 - Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance to rezone 611 & 615 Main Street, approximately 1 acre of land, from Single Family Residential District (R- 2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU). Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/E. Grobe) The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -07 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 3 - L, AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY REZONING APPROXIMATELY 1 ACRE OF LAND FROM SINGLE - FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT, (R -2) TO MAIN STREET MIXED USE DISTRICT (MSMU). Ordinance No. 17 -A -08 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance regarding the annexation of approximately 63 -acres of land generally located on Trainer Hale Road, approximately 600 feet north of I -10, specifically located at 7424 Trainer Hale Road, Bexar County, Texas. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/C. Gould) The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -A -1 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, PROVIDING FOR THE EXTENSION OF THE BOUNDARY LINES OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS BY THE ANNEXATION OF APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES LOCATED ON TRAINER HALE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 600 FEET NORTH OF 1 -10, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. 5. Ordinance No. 17 -S -09- Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance on a request to zone approximately 63 acres of land to Public Use District (PUB). The property is more specifically described as a portion of the E. Gotari Survey No. 2, Abstract No. 5, County Block 5193, Bexar County Texas; located at 7424 Trainer Hale Road. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood /C. Gould) The following was read into record: IN ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -09 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY ZONING APPROXIMATELY 63 ACRES OF LAND TO PUBLIC USE DISTRICT (PUB). May Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro Tem Edwards who moved, seconded by Councilmember Larson to approve the consent agenda items 1 -5. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Discussion and Actiod" Items 6. Resolution No. 17 -R -09 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution Authorizing an Interlocal Agreement with South Texas Regional Advisory Council (STRAC) for EMS Billing Solution Services. (D. Wait /J. Mabbitt) The following was read into record: 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - 4 - RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -09 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH TEXAS REGIONAL ADVISORY COUNCIL ( STRAC) FOR EMS BILLING SOLUTION SERVICES, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized EMS Director Jason Mabbitt who stated South Texas Regional Advisory Council ( STRAC) is the Regional EMS /Trauma Advisory Council designated by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) to design, implement and maintain the Regional EMS /Trauma, Disaster and Emergency Healthcare System. Since 2002, STRAC has provided a regional electronic patient care report (ePCR) system that all 9 -1 -1 EMS agencies can utilize at a much lower cost than implementing such a system individually. As a result of this service line, STRAC also has the appropriate licensing authority from ZOLL Medical Corporation (ePCR vendor) to provide ZOLL's RescueNet Billing Solution as a component of the ePCR project and as such has an interest to provide cost effective software solutions to member agencies. The RescueNet Billing Solution is an EMS billing software system designed specifically for the unique needs of ambulance organizations. This solution streamlines day -to -day billing, accounts receivable and reporting. The RescueNet Billing application integrates completely with RescueNet ePCR product (the system STRAC has been using since 2002) to eliminate redundant data entry increasing the overall efficiency and capability of the public safety system. Schertz EMS purchased ZOLL RescueNet Billing in 2002 when billing was brought in house. Since this time, we have had great success in capturing available revenue with both the ePCR and Billing software packages. The only shortcoming was the ePCR product was in STRACs servers and the Billing product was in our servers. To transfer data, some would automatically transfer while other critical billing data still had to be entered by hand. In 2015, the City's IT Department noti Pied EMS of the need to upgrade their RescueNET Billing server. At the same time, STRAC was seeking agencies willing to utilize the RescueNET Billing software included with the ePCR product at STRAC. Testing was done and it was determined that moving our licenses over to STRAC would allow our billing to be done from the save servers (and same database) as the ePCR which would eliminate almost all of the data entry of EMS Billing staff leading to greater productivity. Additionally, this would prevent the regular replacement costs of a billing server on the City network every three to four years. Staff has reviewed the benefits of participating in this cooperative agreement and has concluded that the program will provide the best value to the City and taxpayers. The cost of participating with STRAC's RescueNet Billing Solution is $15,000 annually and was approved for the 2016/2017 budget. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Councilmember Davis to approve Resolution 17 -R -09. The vote was unanimous with 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - 5 - Mayor Pro -Tern Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 7. Resolution No. 17 -R -10 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution requesting permission to apply for the 2017 Homeland Security Grant Funds for Hazmat Equipment. (D. Wait /D. Covington/K. Long) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -10 4^ A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $76,767.47 TO THE STATE ADMINISTRATIVE AGENCY FOR GRANT FUNDS FROM THE 2017 HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT PROGRAM TO PREVENT, RESPOND TO, AND RECOVER FROM ACTS OF TERRORISM AND NATURAL DISASTERS; AND AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FUNDS, UPON AWARD. Mayor Carpenter recognized Assistant Fire Chief Kade Long who stated Schertz Fire is a founding member of the FEMA Type III, GuadaComa Emergency Response Group that includes New Braunfels, Seguin, Cibolo, Selma and the Guadalupe, Comal and Bexar county area. The team currently covers 395 square miles of 3 counties ( Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe Counties). The estimated population in this area is approximately 235,000. This group's sole purpose is to jointly mitigate hazardous material incidents to limit the public and commercial impact of hazardous materials situations. In addition, Schertz Fire participates in numerous mutual aid agreements including regional and statewide responses. In hazardous material situations it is imperative to be able to properly identify the hazardous product that is being dealt with in a rapid manner. Technology now allows a device to be carried to a scene that will identify approximately 50,000 different chemicals and compounds. Additionally, in hazardous ma situations and almost every other firefighting operation , proper personal protective eq ment protects firefighters during operations on emergency scenes. Increased attention is being focused on breathing protection in situations where oxygen may be prevalent but the air is still heavy laden with particulates. Schertz Fire is also seeking particulate filter cartridge adapters for their self - contained breathing apparatus for firefighters to use on a variety of response scenes to further protect their personnel every day. If awarded this, grant, Schertz Fire personnel will be placed in PPE that provides a cooler option for firefighters that are working in a non - oxygen deficient atmosphere and will have a device to help identify hazards present during hazardous material responses. Equipment is expected to cost $76,767.47, of which all $76,767.47 will be state funds and no matching City funds will be used. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tern Edwards to approve the consent Resolution 17 -R -10. The vote was unanimous 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - 6 - with Mayor Pro -Tern Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 8. Resolution No. 17 -R -06 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the City Manager or his designee and its City Attorney to move forward with obtaining rights of entry for surveying and geologic testing in determining the final route of the Schertz- Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) parallel pipeline. (D. Wait) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -06 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING THE FILING OF A PETITION FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO GAIN NECESSARY ACCESS FOR DETERMINING THE LOCATION OF EASEMENTS AND IN ANTICIPATION OF FUTURE USE OF THE POWER OF EMINENT DOMAIN TO ACQUIRE SAID EASEMENTS NECESSARY FOR THE COMPLETION OF THE SCHERTZ- SEGUIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATION'S ( "SSLGC ") SECONDARY PIPELINE AND WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Mayor Carpenter recognized Executive Director Dudley Wait who stated in 1998 the cities of Schertz and Seguin formed the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation to secure water rights, produce that water and transport that water to the founding cities. During this process 43 miles of pipeline was built between Gonzales County and the City of Schertz. As the SSLGC has matured the corporation has made several business decisions that have benefited Schertz and Seguin by maintaining lower water rates. One of most important decisions was entering into a partnership with the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) to process and transport their water produced in Gonzales County. These 12,000 acre feet per year are critical to SAWS capacity and the fees paid to transport this water have saved our rate payers millions of dollars over the last several years. One of the side effects of this decision was essentially giving one -half of the capacity of the 36" pipeline from Seguin to Schertz to SAWS for their water transport. This decision was well understood when it was entered into by SSLGC and both cities. It was a good decision because the construction of a parallel pipeline from Seguin to Schertz was a part of SSLGC's long term growth as other well fields were developed to meet the water needs of a rapidly growing Schertz. Last year, SSLGC obtained funding from the Texas Water Development Board to begin this next phase of their growth. The first project is the construction of the parallel pipeline and the first steps of this project is the engineering study to determine the actual route of the new pipeline. It is the desire of SSLGC that the pipeline run as close as possible to the original pipeline, however development and logistic issues will require some variation with the 2nd pipeline. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - 7 - Anytime the City desires to build infrastructure such as a pipeline for the greater good of the community that will cross private property, there are a number of steps that the governing body must be prepared to undertake to complete the project. The most difficult pieces of this process are those that allow the City to access private property to survey and determine the best route for the project and then to compensate the property owner appropriately for easements where the pipeline will be placed and maintained. Ideally, property owners will understand the need for this infrastructure and will cooperatively allow the City to access their property to conduct surveys and land studies and then negotiate in good faith with the City for the purchase of needed easements. The largest majority of property owners SSLGC interacted with for the first pipeline were willing participants in the process; however, there were those who were not willing and the City had to utilize the power of eminent domain to accomplish the final product. 100% SSLGC has begun the necessary steps to determine the final route of the parallel pipeline. In order to study the proposed route, survey the land and do appropriate geologic testing, SSLGC's engineers must gain access to all the parcels of land that are proposed to be crossed. A land agent has been retained by SSLGC and they have begun the process of contacting the almost 80 land owners to access over 110 parcels that may be impacted seeking a voluntary "Right of Entry" agreement. To date, the largest majorities of land owners have agreed and have signed these agreements. However, as can be expected from the history with the first pipeline, there are some land owners that are not agreeable to signing an entry agreement. As the process continues, if these land owners continue to refuse to sign an agreement, we will reach a time where it will be necessary to take legal action to obtain a right to enter these remaining properties so the route can be appropriately studied. This process to obtain Rights of Entry is being conducted by Statewide Right of Way Services. This firm is doing all of the research for each parcel of land to determine the owner, to locate the owner and to communicate effectively with the owner about the process we are asking them to participate in. This process involves a number of mailings, phone calls and attempted visits to each property owner. If none of this effort is successful, a renewed communication effort by the attorney handling the Right of Entry legal matters will happen via mail. It is only after this complete process is unsuccessful that the City Attorney would then begin the court proceedings for an injunction. This process is outlined in Attachment D. SSLGC is not a governmental entity and as such, does not have the right of eminent domain and must rely upon its two member cities to conduct these activities. Seguin and Schertz have agreed to split the length of the pipeline in half and Seguin will do this legal work on the half closest to Seguin and Schertz will do the legal work on the half closest to Schertz. The dividing line is Gembler Road on the east side of Marion. Our City Attorney firm has agreed to do the legal work necessary for our portion of the proposed route and tonight, City Staff is asking City Council to pass a resolution authorizing our attorney to perform the legal work necessary to obtain the "Right of Entry" only. This authorization is not to perform condemnation or other eminent domain work at this time and is limited to only getting SSLGC access to the parcels where the property owners are not willing to voluntarily sign an entry agreement. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes page - 8 - Staff is seeking authorization to begin the land acquisition process for the building of a parallel water pipeline from the SSLGC booster pump station in Seguin to the City of Schertz water system. The City's responsibility is to do this land work for the pipeline route from Gembler Road in Marion to the City of Schertz. This includes approximately 48 parcels of land. This land acquisition process has several steps. The first step is a Right of Entry. The Right of Entry gives SSLGC authority to enter private property to survey the land, do geologic and environmental testing and to determine the best route for the proposed pipeline. This process will disturb the land for the geologic and environmental testing (boring for samples, etc) but this disturbance should be minimal. The Right of Entry step is ideally a voluntary process. A contracted land agent has been working with the land owners to seek a voluntary Right of Entry for each parcel of land. To date, the land owners along the proposed route from Gembler Road to Main Street and Schaefer Road in Cibolo have all signed voluntary Right of Entry documents. Land owners from Cibolo to the Schertz water plant are being contacted at this time so the status of these parcels remains unknown. If a property owner declines to sign a voluntary Right of Entry, despite numerous attempts and numerous discussions, the City has the ability to go to court to obtain an injunction that allows the City to access the private land for the surveying and testing phase of the project. This process gives the property owner the opportunity to be heard by a judge before the injunction is granted. Once the entire route of the project is surveyed and , ed, the project can be completely designed. Once the design process is complete, the final route of the pipeline will be completely known and the land acquisition process will move to step two: the purchase of easements for the placement of the pipeline. Again, the process of purchasing easements will be a voluntary process of negotiations around the appraised value of the land the easement will cross followed by agreeing to a purchase price and then the actual purchase of the easement. However, like the Right of Entry process, it is likely that some property owners may be reluctant to voluntarily allow the City to purchase easements or may want more dollars than the land has been appraised. If this occurs, then the process of land condemnation would begin whereby legal proceedings determine the fair market value of the land and the land is purchased by the City at that value against the will of the property owner. It is noteworthy to mention that the City and SSLGC will not be purchasing land, but easements across that land. This easement will be a 30' wide path over which the landowner cannot legally build or construct any permanent improvement. It does not however preclude the landowner from using the land for livestock, farming or any other use that does not involve a permanent improvement over the easement. By acting to authorize the City Attorney to conduct Right of Entry work as necessary the City Council is beginning the land acquisition process for the construction of the SSLGC parallel pipeline. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 9 - The construction of a parallel pipeline for water transmission to Schertz by SSLGC is necessary to have the water volumes available for our community after 2021. With our community's growth and increased water demand, we are approaching a time where the current single pipeline will reach its capacity and limit the amount of water we can obtain in our transmission system for our citizens. Additionally, a parallel pipeline will also give us redundancy and security in the event of a catastrophic failure of our current pipeline. The engineering phase of the pipeline project is included in the overall expenses of constructing the parallel pipeline. The costs of this project are being financed for SSLGC through funds from the Texas Water Development Board. All costs incurred by the City will be reimbursed by SSLGC's bond funds from TWDB. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Wait and City Attorney Ms. Banks addressed questions and comments from Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve the consent Resolution 17 -R -06. The vote was 6 -1 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion passed. 9. Resolution No. 17 -R -07 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the Preconstruction Phase Service only of the Construction Manager at Risk Agreement for Fire Station #3 and miscellaneous projects and associated support systems. (D. Wait/P. Gaudreau) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -07 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE PRECONSTRUCTION PHASE SERVICE ONLY OF THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGER AT RISK AGREEMENT FOR FIRE STATION #3 AND MISCELLANEOUS PROJECTS AND ASSOCIATED SUPPORT SYSTEMS AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized Owners Representative Phil Gaudreau who stated the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) is a construction manager delivery method that entails a construction firm being brought on during the design phase of a project and through their participation in completing that design; the firm delivers the customer a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP). This works to the owner's benefit because the construction firm must manage and control construction costs in order to not exceed the GMP because any costs above the GMP that are not change orders, are the financial liability of CMAR. The City has used this method of construction most recently for the Aquatic Facility. This process allows the City to have full review of the costs of construction during the design process to guarantee that the project being designed has the funds necessary to be successfully built. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 10 - On July 26, 2016 City Council authorized contracting with BRW Architects for the design of Fire Station #3. Since that time, staff has been working with the architects to develop a schematic design for the facility. As is typical of the Construction Manager at Risk method of construction, prior to proceeding with the design development phase, the Construction Manager at Risk should be brought into the process. This is so that the Construction Manager at Risk can work with the Architect and the City to begin determining the cost to construct the facility and adjustments can be made to the schematic plan in conjunction with completing the construction drawings for the facility in order to stay within the budget. When preparing to seek a CMAR through a Request for Qualifications, staff decided to include five repair and renovation projects into the scope of the RFQ. `Recent experience we have had plus the status of the local construction industry concerned staff that attempting to complete these five smaller projects on their own would not attract a high quality firm or would return an overinflated price due to the high demand in local construction. In an effort to obtain better pricing for the miscellaneous projects, these were combined as part of the RFQ and contract for the construction of the Fire station. These projects include: • Repairs to the exterior of Fire Station #2. • Renovations to the Senior Center in the areas formally occupied by WellMed. • Renovations to the 311 area and Human Resource's Department to provide additional office space for staff. • Renovations to the Civic Center to provide additional office space for staff. • Renovations to the Mayor's office area to provide a waiting room. Summaries of these projects are provided in the attached Exhibit C. Most of these projects have been discussed with City Council at various times over the past few years and funds have been approved as part of past budgets and CO bond sales, but the summary is being attached as they have not all been discussed with the current City Council. The approval being sought is simply to contract with the Construction Manager at Risk for Preconstruction Phase Services to establish a guaranteed maximum price for Fire Station #3 and for each of these five additional projects. This provides the City the cost of constructing these projects. Once staff has those costs an item will be presented to City Council seeking approval to construct some or all of the projects based on the availability of funding. One of the benefits of the Construction Manager at Risk method is that it reduces the likelihood that the City will spend the time and money to fully design a project only to have subsequent construction bids come in well in excess of the available budget and being unable to construct the project. On October 31 "2016, a Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for Fire Station #3 using the two step selection process under Section 2269 et seq. of the Texas Government Code (The Code) for a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) was issued by the City. An Addenda to that RFQ was issued on November 14, 2016 adding the five Miscellaneous Projects to the RFQ and extending the deadline for submittals to November 23, 2016. Eight responses to this RFQ were received on November 23, 2016. These responses were evaluated by a selection committee comprised of City employees and members of the Architect's staff. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 11 - The responding firms were evaluated by the committee and ranked solely on the basis of their qualifications in the first step as required by The Code. The two top ranked firms were then interviewed by the selection committee on December 20, 2016. Contract negotiations were initiated with Thomas S Byrne, Ltd over the next several weeks and the City has reached an agreement. At the conclusion of this process the committee recommends the award of the Preconstruction Phase Services of the Construction Manager at Risk Agreement to Thomas S Byrne, Ltd. This is the same firm that recently completed the repairs to the Recreatii<enter and is finishing work on the Aquatic Center. Fire Station #3 funding will be from the GO 2016 Bonds and the upcoming GO 2017 Bonds. Funding for the miscellaneous projects will come from the CO 2016 Bonds and funds set aside in the fund balance for building renovations in FY 2013 -14 and FY 2014 -15. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Gaudreau, Mr. Wait, Mr. James and 4s: =.,GWzalez addressed questions and comments from Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -tem Edwards to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -07. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Roll Call Vote Confirmation Mayor Carpenter recognized Deputy City Secretary Donna Schmoekel who provided the roll call votes for agenda items 1 -9. Mayor Carpenter moved to the Executive Session of the Agenda. Executive Session M W **,. e 13. City Council will meet in closed session under section 551.074 of the Texas Government Code, Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager. Mayor Carpenter recessed into executive session at 7 :00 p.m. Reconvene into Regular Session Mayor Carpenter reconvened into regular session at 11:43 p.m. 13a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 13. No action was taken. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 12 - Mayor Carpenter moved to agenda item 10. Requests and Announcements 10. Announcements by City Manager. No further announcements were made. 11. Future Agenda Item Request for City Council: This is an opportunity for City Council members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. No discussion of the merits of the item may be taken at this time. Should a Council Member oppose placement of the requested item on a future agenda, the Mayor, without allowing discussion, shall ask for the consensus of the other City Council members to place or not place the item on a future agenda. No requests were made. 12. Announcements by Mayor and Councilme tubers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers No announceme were Adiournment Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at 11 ATTEST: Donna Schmoekel, Deputy City Secretary 45 p.m. 2 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 13 - Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor MINUTES SPECIAL TOWN HALL MEETING February 21, 2017 A Special Town Hall Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on February 21, 2017, at 6:30 p.m., in the Ray D. Corbett Jr. High School, 12000 Ray Corbett Drive, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James Executive Director Kyle Kinateder City Secretary Brenda Dennis Police Chief Michael Hansen Mayor Pro -Tem Cedric Edwards Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Robin Thompson Councilmember Bert Crawford City Manager John Kessel Executive Director Dudley Wait Assistant to the City Manager Sarah Gonzalez Deputy City Secretary Donna Schmoekel Fire Chief David Covington Assistant Fire Chief Kade Long EMS Director Jason Mabbitt City Engineer Kathy Woodlee Assistant Public Works Director Jimmy Hooks IT Director Myles Clauser GIS Coordinator Tony McFalls Marshall Michael Harris %khb,- Finance Director James Walters Municipal Court Administrator Patty Veliz Library Director Melissa Uhlhorn Public Affairs Director Linda Klepper Director of Purchasing and Human Resources Jessica Director of Planning & Community Development Lesa Wood Call to Order — City Council Special town Hall Meeting 7:02 p.m. Mayor Carpenter welcomed everyone in attendance this evening. Mayor Carpenter provided the pledge of allegiance to the flag of the United States and provided the opening prayer. He then introduced City Secretary Brenda Dennis who recognized all the councilmembers and management staff present. Ms. Dennis provided an outline of how the evening events will be presented. Presentations regarding the specific topics: • South Schertz Development Updates Director of Planning & Community Development Lesa Wood spoke on this topic and provided a Power Point presentation reflecting a map showing the residential development in south Schertz, which includes Willow Grove U3, Crossvine M1U4A, Reserve at Schertz II, Rhine Valley, Crossvine M1U2A &B, and Hallies Cove. 02 -21 -2017 Minutes page - 1 - New residential development, under construction or recentiv completed: Project Number of Lots Crossvine Mod. 1 Units 2 A &B, Unit 4A 120 Reserve at Schertz II 127 Rhine Valley Units 1, 3A, and 4 258 Willow Grove Unit 3 93 Total 598 Ms. Wood showed slides depicting Hallies Cove, Rhine Valley - Parkland, and the Rose Garden Replacement Site and explained future plans for these areas. Ms. Wood addressed questions from citizens (see exhibit A attached) 4( X Garbage Service A, Executive Director Dudley Wait spoke to residents providing a color coded map reflecting the different areas of the city and their current collection schedule of either one collection day per week or two collection days per week. Ife also provided a chart comparing the fees, cart provision, and per week pickup as follows: City Cibolo New Braunfels San Antonio Schertzlom Seguin Selma Fee Cart Provision Per Week Pickup $ 15.01 Provided Once $ 17.66 Provided Once $ 20.93 Provided Once T $ 14.04 Both $ 12.70 Provided Once $ 9.19 Provided Twice Mr. Wait addressed questions from citizens. (see exhibit A attached). • JLUS /Land Use Update Executive Director Brian James presented a Power Point presentation regarding information on the Joint Land Use Study (JLUS), which is an effort by cities and counties around Randolph to guide planning and development around the base to ensure compatibility between surrounding land uses and the base. The most recent JLUS was completed in July of 2015; the prior one being issued in 2008. Since then, there have been some significant changes: • Clear Zones extended to standard 3,000' x 3,000' • Significantly reduced residential density in Accident Potential Zone II (APZ II) 02 -21 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - ■ Increased awareness of solar (glare), height (wind power), noise (impact on quality of life), and bird hazards Implementation Strategies are: ■ The JLUS includes variety implementation strategies. It is up to each city to implement the strategies that apply to their community as they see fit. • Schertz has created sound attenuation requirements to reduce noise from aircraft for new homes in the noise contour Land Use Conflicts: ■ Most significant area of review for the City is south of Randolph • Proposing changes to the Comprehensive Plan back to what had been designated in the 2002 plan. • Notices will be sent to impacted property owners, information to be posted to the City's website, staff is available to meet and public hearings at Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council. Mr. James addressed questions from citizens. (see exhibit A attached). • Sewer and Water Service City Engineer Kathy Woodlee and Assistant Public Works Director Jimmy Hooks provided the latest information regarding sewer and water service for the area. The maps provided information on the location of the Woman Hollering Creek Waste Water Main, the CCMA Southern Treatment Plant, and the Cibolo West Waste Water Main. The engineering and design phase includes 1) a preliminary route evaluation, based on topography and roughly based on property lines and major physical obstacles as well as an alternative route analysis, and 2) surveying and testing, including line location confirmation, geotechnical testing and environmental testing. The next steps for the wastewater project is to complete the survey and testing, complete the engineering and design, acquire easements, release the project for bid, and construction. The current schedule is anticipating a mid to late 2018 completion. A Corbett elevated water tank is being planned for. The site will be at the end of a future extension of Ray Corbett Drive. It will be a one million gallon elevated water tank, with a planned future 3 million gallon ground storage tank — ultimately to be fed by a new water transmission main from Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC). Ms. Woodlee and Mr. Hooks addressed questions from citizens. (see exhibit A attached). • FM 1518 /Thoroughfare Plan City Engineer Kathy Woodlee and Executive Director Brian James presented information on planned FM 1518 improvements including the stretch from FM 78 to IH 10, the City Bond of $5 million, the TxDOT Contribution of $5 million, and the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) — Federal Funding of $9.5 million. The project is currently programmed for 2021 and adds up to $19.5 million. A traffic signal light at Schaefer Road is planned to be installed before August of 2017. 02 -21 -2017 Minutes page - 3 - A Master Thoroughfare Plan update was also presented. The purpose of a thoroughfare plan is to 1) providing for the orderly development of an adequate major street system as land development occurs and as traffic increases (Are our existing roads sized properly? What new roads do we need as the City grows ?), 2) to enable coordination with outside agencies and private interests with respect to roadway improvements (we need to be sure our future roads line up with our neighbors' future roads.), 3) to reduce travel and transportation costs (Proper planning and construction minimizes traffic congestion.). There are seven Thoroughfare Plan tasks: 1) identify issues and develop policies, 2) coordinate with other agencies, 3) analyze existing thoroughfare system, 4) future land use growth scenarios, 5) development of thoroughfare plan, 6) plan strategies and CIP programming, and 7) plan adoption and documentation. Key issues and considerations are: 1) a plan sets a rough alignment of future needed roadways — it can cause concern for property owners who don't want a road through or near their property, 2) as the city grows, additional capacity and connections are needed, and 3) a thoroughfare plan ensures that as development occurs, future connections are accommodated. Currently, the final draft of the map is complete and staff is working with FNI to complete the plan report draft. NIL, Ms. Woodlee addressed questions from citizens. (see exhibit ` hed). • Fire Station #3 Status Assistant Fire Chief Kade Long updated the audience on the current status of the proposed Fire Station #3 and provided several Power Point slides reflecting the location of the current fire stations #1 and #2 and their respective service areas, the location of responses during the past year, a drawing of the proposed fire station #3 and the surrounding property design layo Mr. Long addressed questions from citizens. (see exhibit A attached) Adiournment After all the pr entations were concluded by city staff and there were no further questions, Mayor Carpenter thanked the residents for attending/participating and all the City Staff members for making this a successful meeting. Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at 9:08 p.m. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary 02 -21 -2017 Minutes Page - 4 - Council on the Go Meeting Questions from residents February 21, 2017. 1. Wayne Ashbury (not a resident, resides in Boerne, TX), who cautioned about pricing some potential home buyers out of their affordability and thus limiting a diverse population. 2. Lynn Domangue, 2824 Berry Park, who stated she was disappointed in council's denial of a proposed apartment complex a while back — this limits diversity. She asked what is R6 and R7 zoning. 3. Clare Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows Drive, who thanked the city and staff for sticking to the Gateway Plan. Keep it rural! The audience clapped in response. 4. Abigail Kniper, 3601 Blakely Street, who spoke regarding the size of garbage cans and twice a week pick up versus once a week pickup. 5. Charles Polk, 10325 Obernai Path, who asked about the possibility of the city looking for another garbage vendor vs. the current one we contract with. 6. Glenna Miranda, 11802 Hopes Hollow, who expressed concerns about the rate of growth and development - - -so many homes being built. 7. Roger Garrett, 3044 Turquoise, who spoke about once a week trash pickup versus twice a week pickup. 8. Brian Edington, 3037 Pencil Cholla, who asked about larger trash bins and recycling. 9. Grumpy Azzoz, 528 Wayward Pass, who is in favor of once a week pickup — remember those trucks are heavy and wear and tear on the roads. 10. Steve Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows Drive, who asked about no action being taken at the Woman Hollering Creek, bridge area. 11. Tim Tate, 7997 Tate's Drive, who asked about the dollars spent for the waterline off Lower Seguin Road. 12. Rodney Ellison, 12762 Woman Hollering Rd, who asked about projects for capturing water or if it will just be lost to us. He also asked about plans for increased runoff of water during heavy rains /flooding. 13. Grumpy Azzoz, 528 Wayward Pass, asked if this meeting was being streamed live. 14. Female (no name provided), who asked about a time frame of building a new water tower and will there be more lift stations built. 15. Steve Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows, who asked about the building of the new water tank and the old water line that serves Schertz. The new line is not ready yet and it will be a while. 16. Grumpy Azzoz, 528 Wayward Pass, who asked if the sewer line and water line following down Woman Hollering Creek would be parallel to each other. 17. Clare Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows, who thanked staff for their efforts and work on FM 1518it is a big project. She asked about plans for more intersections. 18. Steve Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows, who asked about plans for extending FM 3009 down through Schertz. Proposed development versus pockets of preservation, etc. 19. Male (no name provided), asked where the Fire Station No. 3 is going to be built. 20. Steve Layton, 12231 Lost Meadows, who asked what year the Fire Station will be open for business. Agenda No. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Marshal's Office: Environmental Health Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -M -10 Adoption of Texas Food and Beverage Establishment Rules First Reading BACKGROUND: No substantial changes to our current code. The Texas Administrative Code has been update and moved to a new section within the code. The changes to the code more closely resemble federal food regulations. This change now makes it necessary for the City to adopt the section of the Texas Administrative Code that contain the updates. FISCAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City of Schertz adopt the most recent changes to the Texas Administrative Code pertaining to food establishment rules by amending the City of Schertz Code of Ordinances. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance No. 17 -M -10 50077367.2 ORDINANCE NO. 17 -M -10 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING THE CITY OF SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES CHAPTER 34, ARTICLE 11. FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS, SECTION 34 -22, REGARDNG THE ADOPTION OF THE TEXAS FOOD AND BEVERAGE ESTABLISHMENT RULES; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Section. 34 -22. - Adoption of Texas Food and Beverage Establishment Rules. Currently reads as follows: WHEREAS, Section. 34 -22 should be changed to the following: A person operating a food establishment, vending machine, mobile food establishment, temporary event, farmers market, or farmers market vendor booth shall comply with this chapter and, the City adopts the Texas Administrative Code Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 228 (Texas Food Establishment Rules) and Chapter 229, Subchapter N (Current Good Manufacturing Practice And Good Warehousing Practice In Manufacturing, Packing And Holding Human Food). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. That Section. 34 -22 be changed to state, A person operating a food establishment, vending machine, mobile food establishment, temporary event, farmers market, or farmers market vendor booth shall comply with this chapter and, the City adopts the Texas Administrative Code Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 228 (Texas Food Establishment Rules) and Chapter 229, Subchapter N (Current Good Manufacturing Practice And Good Warehousing Practice In Manufacturing, Packing And Holding Human Food). Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. r.vrp.T ROM NOW M. WHEREAS, Section. 34 -22 should be changed to the following: A person operating a food establishment, vending machine, mobile food establishment, temporary event, farmers market, or farmers market vendor booth shall comply with this chapter and, the City adopts the Texas Administrative Code Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 228 (Texas Food Establishment Rules) and Chapter 229, Subchapter N (Current Good Manufacturing Practice And Good Warehousing Practice In Manufacturing, Packing And Holding Human Food). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. That Section. 34 -22 be changed to state, A person operating a food establishment, vending machine, mobile food establishment, temporary event, farmers market, or farmers market vendor booth shall comply with this chapter and, the City adopts the Texas Administrative Code Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 228 (Texas Food Establishment Rules) and Chapter 229, Subchapter N (Current Good Manufacturing Practice And Good Warehousing Practice In Manufacturing, Packing And Holding Human Food). Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT THIS ORDINANCE WAS PASSED and APPROVED on first reading this the 28th day of February, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on second reading this the day of , 2017. APPROVED: Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis 50310827.1 - 2 - Agenda No. 3 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -S -01 — Conduct a Public Hearing and consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance regarding the rezone of 375 acres of land located on Lower Seguin Road and FM 1518. (Second Reading) BACKGROUND On January 10, 2017 City Council conducted a public hearing and approved the first reading for Ordinance 17 -S -01 to amend the Crossvine PDD in order to incorporate a new Garden Home configuration in Module IIA, along with new street cross - sections and other associated development standards. At this meeting, City Council requested that staff provide more information about how the new garden home configuration compares to the previously approved garden home configurations. City Council also requested more information related to the overall concerns raised by residents, particularly the subject areas of lighting, sewer capacity, status of Heritage Oaks Park, and Fire Department's review of the proposed PDD Amendment. City Council held a workshop and conducted a public hearing at the January 24, 2017 meeting. During the January 24th meeting, City staff members gave presentations to provide City Council information about street lights in the Sedona and Crossvine communities, status of the Heritage Oaks Park, progress on the second package treatment sewer plant, drainage conditions around the Sedona and Crossvine communities, and more specific information about garden home configurations associated with the Crossvine PDD. The issues raised related to existing street lighting or lack thereof, the development of Heritage Oaks Park, sewer capacity for future development, existing drainage concerns along FM 1518, and crime are City issues and unrelated to the zoning case. Since the January 24, 2017 meeting, staff has met with and coordinated with the applicant to discuss revisions to the Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment document. Below is a summary of the key elements and related revisions that have been incorporated into the document to address fire related concerns. 1. The minimum separation between adjacent structures is ten feet (10'), with the exception of eaves that may protrude eighteen inches (18 ") into the building separation area and window sills and other architectural features which may protrude twelve inches (12 "). In City Council Memorandum Page 2 the previous version of the draft ordinance bay windows were allowed to extend eighteen inches (18 ") into the building separation area. 2. A two -hour rated firewall shall be required for the walls of any zero lot line home that are less than five feet (5') from the side property line. Homes centered on the lot, one of the exterior side walls shall have a two -hour rated firewall. The developer is required to submit a plan showing locations of two -hour rated firewalls for the Fire Marshal to approve prior to filing a plat for the Garden Home GH(3) area. The previous version did not require one of the walls of centered homes to be a two -hour rated firewall. 3. No fences or other obstructions, except as specifically provided for HVAC units /pads, shall be allowed between houses. Fences will be allowed from the front corner of the houses to the front corner of the adjacent house and from the back corner of the houses to the back corner of the adjacent house so long as gates are provided in the fences. A fence exhibit has been added to the document to illustrate this revised standard. The previous version allowed fences between centered homes. 4. One HVAC unit /pad may be located between homes, and is subject to approval by the Fire Marshal prior to filing a plat. 5. Alleys will be private to allow the HOA to enforce towing in designated fire lanes. Minor wording changes that do not substantively alter the previous version involve changes to walkways in the greenspace and fire hydrant spacing. The Common Area Greenspace shall include a concrete sidewalk that is at least four feet (4') wide that provides access to each home. This standard has not changed, however the language was revised for clarification purposes. Fire hydrant spacing shall be no more than three- hundred feet (300'). This standard has not changed, however the language was revised for clarification purposes. Concerns were raised with regard to parking along Trellis Walk, the central road through the project and the Proposed Local Road. These roads will all have a minimum right -of -way of fifty - six and one -half feet (56.5') and a minimum pavement cross - section of forty -two feet (42'). This cross - section allows for standard eight feet (8') wide parallel parking on both sides while maintaining thirteen feet (13') wide drive lanes. The pavement will be striped to designate the parking areas. Staff does not have a concern about parallel parking on these roads as traffic volumes and proposed speeds do not pose an issue. City staff has reviewed the revisions and has no objections. The changes have been incorporated into the exhibit attached to Ordinance 17 -S -01. As part of the review staff worked to determine where the disconnect occurred that allowed the previous draft of ordinance to be presented for approval in light of the Fire Department's concerns. It was determined that the Fire Department did not realize the extent of changes to the draft when they reviewed it and indicated they did not have concerns. GOAL Schertz 1518, Ltd. is requesting to amend the Crossvine PDD to allow for a new garden home configuration, referred to as GH(3), new street cross - sections and design standards associated with the GH(3) product. The new garden home configuration is proposed to be located south of Lower Seguin Road, within Module IIA of the Crossvine PDD. City Council Memorandum Page 3 COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the amendment request with the revisions that have been incorporated since City Council's approval during the first reading on January 10, 2017. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 17 -S -01 ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -01 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY REZONING APPROXIMATELY 375 ACRES OF LAND FROM PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD). WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 375 acres of land generally located west of the intersection of Lower Seguin Road and FM 1518, and more specifically described in the Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached herein (herein, the "Property ") has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City's Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zone change (the "Criteria "); and WHEREAS, on December 14, 2016, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation of approval of the rezoning according to the development standards set forth in Exhibit C attached herein (the "Development Standards "); and WHEREAS, on January 10, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The Property as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B, is hereby zoned Planned Development District (PDD). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. Approved on first reading the 10th day of January, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 28th day of February, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) Exhibit A "The Property" A374.10 acre tract of land, being comprised of the 3 different tracts, owned by Schertz 1510, LTD, a Texas limited partnership, Tract 1, an B2.80 acre tract lying northwest of Lower Seguin Road, Tract 2, a 41.14 mere tract lying southeast of Louver Seguin Road ant] Tract 3; a 254..16 acre tract, all being more particularly described as fallaws: TRACT 1 A 82.80 acre tract of land, being all of a 13.669 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership of record in Volume 15542 Page 551, a 34.007 acre tract of land as conveyed to S €hertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership of record in Volume 11492 Page S7 and a 35.182 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertx,151 B, LTD, a Texas lltnfted partnership of record in Volume 11492 Page 69 all being of the Official Public Records of 13exar County, Texas and being out of the Jeroniima Leal Survey No. 79, abstract No. 424 in Bexar !County. Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING ata found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument Type 2 in the southwest right - of -ways of F.M. 1518, a variable Width right -cf way, and in a northeast line of the 125.0 acre tract and for the northeast scorner of a 1.00 acre tract of land conveyed to Ruby J. Isaacks Newman of record in Volume 6505 Page 630 of the Deed Records of Bexar County, Texas and for an easterly southeast corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein, THENCE. S 59 °37'43" W along and with the north line of the 1.00 acre tract and a gnuth line. ofthe 13.52 acre tract, a distance of 143.14 Beet to a found fron ,pipe for the northwest corner of the 1.00 acre tract and an interior comer of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 10 011'17" E along and with the west line of the 1.00 acre tract and an east line of the 13.52 acre tract, a distance of 334.32 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northwest right- of-way line of Lower Seguin Road, a variable width right-of-way, for the southwest corner of the 1.00 acre tract and the southerly southeast corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the northwest right-of-way line of the Lower Seguin Road and the southeast line of the 13,52 acre tract and 35.182 acre tract the falIowing calls acid distances; 1. S 60 *08 "45" W, a distance of 1045.35 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KF Surveying" for the southeast corner of the 35.182 acre tract and For the southwest corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein, 2. S 60 °08'36" W, a distance of 24.70 feet tea a found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument Type 1, for an angle point, and 3. S 59 °07'14" W, a distance of 500.04 feet: to a found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument `type 1 for the southwest corner of the 35.182 acre tract and for the southwest corner the tract described herein; THENCE, N 30 °16'36" W along and with a southwest line of the 35.182 acre tract and the northeast line of a 4.494 acre tract of record in Volume 11946 Page 2467, a 1.537 acre tract of record in Volume 3162 Page 937, a 1.04 acre tract, also called parcel 3, and a 1.04 acre tract, also called parcel 2, of record. in Volurne 8830 Page 1933 all teeing or the CfEcial Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and tracts 20 thru 18, the remaining portions of tract 17 and 16 of record in Volume 6800 Pages 47 -50 of the Windy Acres Subdivision of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of 1874.59 .feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying° for the southwest earner of a 2.5.62 acre tract of record in Volume 6105 Page S06 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the northwest scorner of the 35,182 acre tract, for the northwest corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 59 048'14" E along and with a southeast line of the 25.62 acre tract and the northeast lime of the 35.182 acre tract, a distance of 814.44 feet to a set 1/2" iron, rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the northwest corner of a 6.00 acre tract of record in Volume 14786 Page 1862 of the Official Public Records of Rexar County, Texas and the northeast corner of the 35.182 acre tract, for the northeasterly earner of the tract described herein; THENCE. S 30*35'34" E along and with a southwest line of the 6.00 acre tract and the northeast line of the 35.182 acre tract, a distance of 351.18 feet to a found 1/2 " iron rod with cap stamped "BLS 2024 " for the southwest corner of a 6.00 acre tract and the northwest corner of the 34.007 acre tract for an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE. N 59 °43'27" E along and with the southwest line of the 6.04 acre tract and continuing along the southwest line of the remaining portion of a 6.00 acre tract of record in Volume 14454 Page 2114 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the northwest line of the 34.007 acre tract, a distance of 1482.30 feet to a found 1/2" iron _rod on the southwest right-of-way line of F.M. 1518 for the southeast corner of remaining portion of a 6.00 acre tract and the northeast corner of the 34.007 acre tract for the northeast corder of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with a southwest right -of -way line of P.M. 1518 and the northeast line of the 34.007 acre tract and the 1352 acre tract, the following calls and distances: 1. S 30 "07'55" E, a distance of 250.24 feet: to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, and 2- with a curve to the right having a radius of 2825.00 feet, an arc of 977.41 beet, a delta of 19'49'24 ", and a chard bears S 20912 "26" E. a distance of 972.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing B2.80 acres more or Less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and toeing described in accordance with an exhibit prepared by KFW Surveying, TRACT 2 A 41.14 acre tract of land, out of the Julian Diaz Survey Iwo. 66, Abstract No. 187, County Block 5059, and being out of the westerly portion of a 100.966 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11465 Page 348, out of the westerly portion of a 122.533 acre tract of land as conveyed to 5chertz 1516, LTD of record in Volume 11916 Page 1926, and all of 5chnebly Drive, a 96'right -of -way, Lot 1, Block 7 and Lot 56, Block 1 of Sedona Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Volume 9583 Page73 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and situated in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as fallo wa: BEGINNING at a found W iron rod with "OMC` Cap in the southeast right-of-way line of Lower Seguin Road, .a variable width right -of -way, where it intersects with the southwest right -of -way line of Trainer Hale Road and for the northerly corner of Lot 2, Block 7 of the Sedona Unit No. 1, asubdivision of record in Volume 9583 Pages 73 — 78 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and for the northerly corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: JN 63 °10 "28" E over and across Trainer Hale Read along and with the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road, at a distance of 20.04 feet to a set W iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURV'EYIN'G", for the southwest corner of a 1.679 acre tract conveyed to Timothy C. Knotts of record in Volume 9312 Page 804 of the official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the tract described herein, THENCE; S 30 11725" E along and with the northeast line of Trainer Hale Road and the southwest line of the remalning portion of the 1,$79 acre tract, a distance of 693.64 feet to a set 1/2 " iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying " in the southwest right-of-way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of- -way, for an angle" paint, THENCE: along and with the southwest line of the southwest right -of -way line of F.M.151 P, a variable width right -of -ways and the northeast line of the 100.966 acre tract the following six (5) courses: 1. S 16' 28'53" E, a distance of 13.13 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod foran angle point, 2. S 16° 33' 13" E, a distance of 48.11 feet to a set 1/2" iron raid with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying " for an angle point, 3. S 23'17'27" E, a distance Df44.61 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, 4. 5 23° 2S'58" E, a distance of 118.77 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for are angle paint, 5. S 30" 40'34" E. a distance of 170.90 feet to a found 112 " iron rod for are angle point, and 6. S 28° 01'49'E, a distance of 153.01 Feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northeast line of the 100,966 acre tract, for the northwest corner of a variable width right-of-way dedication of record in Crossvine Modulel, Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Vol urne 9668 Pages 176 -182 ofthe Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the southeast corner of th e tra ct d esc ribed herein; THENCE: along and with the northwest line of Lot 35, Block 5, the nurthwest and northeast line of Trellis Walk, a 64' right -of -way, of the Crossvine Modulel, Unit 1 southwest right -of -way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way anti the northeast line of the 100.966 acre tract and a northeast line of the 122.533 acre tract of land conveyed to.Schertz 1518, LTD, the following ten (10) courses: 1. S 59" 44'00" W, a distance of 266.38 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northeast line of Trellis Walk, for an exterior earner of the tract described herein, 2. N 30° 16'00" 1N, a distance of 60.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for the northeast corner of Trellis Walk and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 3. 5 59° 44'00" W, a distance of 294.56 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURV'EY[NG ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 4. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 13.91 Feet; a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 53" 07'48", and a chord bears 5 BW 17' 54" W, a distance of 13.42 Feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped 'KFW SURVEYING" for a point of reverse curvature of the tract described hereln, S. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 137.46 feet, a radius of 60.00 feet, a delta of 131" 15' 37 ", and a chord bears S 47° 14' 00" W, a distance of 149.31 Feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING' for a point of reverse curve, 6. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 13.91 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 53" 07'48", and a chord bears 5 080 10" 06" W, a distance of 13.42 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Slue Plastic Cap stamped "KFW SURVEYING' for a point of tangency, 7. S 34' 44'00" W, a distance of 17'9,17 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of curvature to the right ofthe tract described ,herein, 8. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 164.48 feet, a radius of 370.00 Feet, a delta of 2S® 28' 16 ", and a chord bears N 47° Z8' 08' E, a distance of 163.13 Feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plasdc Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of tangency, 9. S 60° 12' 16" W, a distance of 172.28 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped `KFW SURVEYING" for an angle point of the tract described herein, and 10. S 63° ZH' 39 " W, a distance of 15.02 feet to a point in the northeast right -of -way line of Schnebly Drive and the southeast, for the intersection of Trellis Walk with Schnebly Drive and an interior corner of the tract described herein, THENCE: along and with the southwest and northwest boundary line of Crossvine Modul+el, Unit 1 and the northeast and southeast right -of -way line of Schnebly Drive the following two (2) courses: X. 5 29' 4744" E, a distance of 855.50 feet to a set 1/2 " iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped 'KFW SURVEYING ", for a southeast corner of the tract described herein, and 2. S 60° 12' 16" W, a distance of 105.58 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" in the northeast line of Block 2 aF Sedona Unit 1, for the southwest corner of . rhnehly Drive and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the northeast right -of- -way line of Schnebly Drive and the southeast and southwest lines of Lot 56 into and across the Sedana Unit No. i the following three (3) courses: 1. N 29'48'17" W, a distance of 1931.10 feet Loa set 1/2" iron rod with [flue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the southeast corner of Lot 56 and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 2. S 60' 11'3,1' W, a distance of 290.00 feet to a set 112" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for the southwest corner of Lot 56 and a westerly corner of the tract described herein, and 3. N 29148'25" W. a distance* of ZZ4.64 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Gap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the southeast right -cif-way line of Lower Seguin Road, for the northwest corner of Lot 56 and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road and with the north and northwest 5edona Unit No.1 subdivision plat the following six (6) courses: 1, N 59° 33'06' E, a distance of 299.94 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for an interior corner of the tract described herein, N 30° 26'54" W, a distance of 8.00 feet to a found "X" in concrete, for an exterior carnet of the tract described herein, 3. N 59° 33'06" E, a distance of 96.07 feet to a found 'A" in concrete, for an exterior corner of the tract described 'herein, 4. S 30° 26'54' E, a distance of 8.00 feet to a found %" iron rod with "DNIC" cap, for an interior corner of the tract described herein, S. N 59° 33'06' E, a distance of 1204.83 feet to a found 1h" iron rod with "DMC" Cap, for the northwest corner of Got 2, Block 7 of Sedona Unit 1 and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 6. N 30" 17' 27" W, a distance of 8.80 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 41.14 acres more or less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being described in accordance with an exhibit prepared by KFw Surveying, TRACT 3 A 250.16 acre tract of land, out of the Julian Diaz Survey No. 66, Abstract No. 157, County Black 5059, and being out of the easterly portion of a 122.533 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11918 Page 1926, the remaining portion of 10.0U acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of reward in Volume 11918 Page 1922, the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record In Volume 16609 Page 193 all of a 145.127 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11564 Page 1914, all of a 91.288 acre tract cif land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11601 Page 2280 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of Sedona Lift Station Subdivision, a plat of record in Volume 9611 Page 168 of the Deed and Flat records of Bexar County, Texas and situated in the City of Schertx, Bexar County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows; BEGINNING at a set Viz° iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", in the southwest right-Of- way line of F.M, 1518, a variable width right -of -way, for the southeast cornier of a 2D fact right -of-way dedication by the PropDsed Crossvine Module 1, Unit 2, a subdivision plat this day called, the north corner of the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract of land and for the northeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE. S 30'21'19"E, along and with the southwest right -of- -way line of F.N1.1518, the northeast line of the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract, the remaining portion of a 111.00 acre tract and the 122.533 acre tract, a distance of 458.14 feet to a found W iron rod with a cap stamped "VIC RE`s PROP CDR", for a southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: with a southeast line of the 122.533 acre tract and the northwest, southwest and southeast lines of Lot 1, Black 1 Washington, Tyrannus School of the Arts, a subdivision of record in volume 9616 Page 24 of the Deed and Flat Records of Bexar County, Texas and a northeast and a northwest line of the 145,427 acre tract, the following three (3) courses: 1. 5 59" 37' 09" W, at a distance of 20.00 feet passing the north corner of Lot 1, Block 1 and continuing for a total distance of 1089.48 feet to a found PK Nail for the west carrier of Lot 1, Block 1, in the northeast line of the 145.427 acre tract, a south corner of the 122.533 acre tract and an interior corner of the tract described herein; 1 S 30* 11'00" E, a distance of 1062.20 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for tine south corner of Lot 1, Black 1, an Interior corner ofthe 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein, and 3. N 60' 03'29" E, at a distance of 1072 -71 feet passing the east corner of Lot 1, Black land continuing for a total distance of 1092,71 Feet to a found iron pipc in the southwest right- of-way line of FM 1518 for the northeast corner of the 145,427 acre tract and an easterly corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 301 21' 21" E with the southwest right -of -way line of FM 151 B, a northeast line ofthe 145.427 acre tract and with a northeast line of Lot 1, Block 1, Sedona Lift Station Subdivision of record in Volume 4611 Page 168 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of 1739.48 feet to a point for the northeast corner of a 10.00 acre tract of land conveyed to Ernestina Navarro of record Iri Volume 13868 Page 1327 of the Official. Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and for the southeast corner of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 59 119'19" W with the northwest line of the 10.00 acre Navarro tract and a southeast line of the 145.427 acre tract, a distance of 1749.17 feet passing a found W iron rod for the northwest corner of the 10.00 acre Navarro tract and an angle point in the southeast line of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 59° 39'56' W with the with the northwwest line of a 9.968 acre tract, called Exhibit B, conveyed to Jennifer]. and Edward M. Varelarss ofrecord in Volurne 10054 Page 1692 of the Official Public Records ofBexar County, Texas and continuing with a southeast Iine of the 145.427 acre tract, a distance of 509.91 feet to a Found iron rod its a northeast line of the 91.288 acre tract for the northwest corner of the 9.968 acre Varelans tract and an interior corner of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein, THENCE: 5 29° 19' 26" E with the with the southwest line of a 9.958 acre tract and a northeast line of the 91.288 acre tract, a distance of 1598.70 Beet to a found W iron rod in the northwest right -of -way line of Ware - Seguin Road, a variable width right -nF way and for the southeast corner of the 91.288 acre tract and the most southerly, southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE; 5 57° 50'51" W with the northwest right -of -way line of Ware - Seguin Road and the southeast line of the 91.288 acre tract and the southeast corner of a 297520 acre tract ofland conveyed to Schertz 1518., LTD of record in Volume 11641 Page 2285 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of663.33 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped `KFW Surveying" for the southwest corner of the 91.288 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: N3011 t 1' 13" W wtrh the southwest line of the 91.28$ acre tract and, the northeast line of the 247.524 acre tract, a distance of 48110.86 Feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the southwest corner of a 16.17 acre tract of land conveyed to 3GG Properties, LLC of record In Volume 17448 Page 1341 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas, a northwest corner of the 91.296 acre tractand the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the common IinLas aFthe 16.17 acre tract and the 91.288 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72 °07'15" E, a distance of 322.58 fleet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", far an angle point of tha tract described herein, and 2_ N 76°03'39" E, a distance of 419.95 feet to a set 1/2 "° iron read with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the southwest line of the 145.427 acre tract, for the southeast corner of the 16.17 acre tract the northeast corner of the 91.288 acre tract and an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the common lines of the 16.17 acre tract, the 145.427 acre tract and the remaining portion of the 91.288 acre tract, the Following four (4) courses: 1. N 29132'10" W, a distance of 557.33 feetto a set 1/2" iron red with Blue Plastic Gap Stamped "KFW Surveying", for an angle point of the tract described herein, 2. N 55 052'12" W, a distance of 94.72 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "l{liW Surveying ", for an angle point of the tract described herein, 3. N 3WO7'33' iW, a distance of 94.40 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFVV Surveying ", for an angle point of the tract described herein, and 4. N 20 *41'48" W, a distance of 253.94 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped r'KF Surveying" in the southwest line of the 122.533 acre tract; for the southeast corder of loot 4, N.C,B 16560 of the Greaves Subdivision, a plat ofrecsard in Volume 9615 Page 53 ofthe Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a northeast corner of the 16.17 .acre tract and an angle point of the tract described herein; THENCE, N 29' 46'26"W, along; and with a southwest line of the 122.533 acre tract and northeast line of Lot 4, a distance of 915.48 feet to point in the centerline of the Humble Pipeline Easement of record in Volume 4725 Page 616 of the Official Public Records of 9exar County, Texas, For the northwest corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 64 °35'24" E, into and across the 122.533 acre tract and along and with the centerline of the Humble Pipeline Easement, a distance of 771,95 feet to a point in the north line of Lot 2, Bloch 2 of the Crossvine Module 1, Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Volume 9668 Pages 176 -182 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, the southwest right- oF -way line of proposed Hollering Vine, a 60' right- of-moray of the Proposed Crossvine Module 1, Unit 2, For the northeast corner of the tract described herein, THENCE: along and with the proposed Hollering Vine. into and across the 122333 acre tract. the 145.427 acre tract, the 10.00 acre tract and the 1.5014 acre tract, the following thirty -nine (39) courses: 1. S 10 °55'05 " E, a distance of 224.82 feet to a set 1 /2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herei n, 2, with a curve to the right, having an are of 23.48 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 140'28°', and a chard hears S 33 °55'09" f+4W, a distance of 21.15 feet to a set 1/2" iron roll with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped `KFW Surveying ", for an tnterlor corner of the rract described herein, 3, S 10 °43'22° E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein; 4. with a non - tangent curve to the right, having an arc of 23.65 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 90 °19'32 ", and a chord bears S 56 °04'51' E, a distance of 21.27 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", fora point of tangency of the tract described herein, S. S 10 °55'05" E, a distance of 32.61 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein 6. with a curve to the left, leaving an arc of 398.52 feet, a radius of 680.00 feet a delta of 33 °3444 ", and a Chord hears 5 Z7 °42'27" E, a. distance of 392.84 feet to a set 1/2" iron rani with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 7. S 4"4'Z9'49 " E, a distance of 181,90 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped 'KFW SURVEYING ", For a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, 8. with a curve to the left, having an are o €108.25 feet a radius of 590.00 feet, a delta of 10'30'44", and a chord bears 5 49 °45'11 " E, a distance of 108.10 feet to a set 1/2" earn rod with Slue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of reverse curvature, 9. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 22.57 €eet, a radius of 15.D0 Feet, a delta of 86 °12'33 ", and a chord bears S 11 °54'17' E, a distance of 20.50 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 10. S 58 '48'01' E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" frog rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamper] "KFW SURVEYING" in a curve to the right, For an interior of the tract described. herein, 11. with a non.- tangent curve to the right having an arc of ZZ,57 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 86'12'33 ", and a chord bears N 74 °18'15 " E, a distance of 20.50 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW 'Surveying", for a paint of revers curvature of the tract described herein, 12. with a curve to theIeft, having an arc of 270.95 feet, a radius of 590.00 feet, a delta of 26'18'44 ", and a chord bears S 7S'44`SO " E, a distance of 268,57 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped " KFW Surveying ", for a" point of tangency, 13. S 88"54`12" E, a distance of 128.30 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING", For a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 14, with a curve to the right, having an arc of 23,58 feet, a radixes of 15,00 feet, a delta of 90'03'52 ", and a chord bears 5 43 °52'16" E, a distance of 21.23 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 15. S 88¢56'31" £, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "'KFW SURVEYING" in a curve to the right, for an interior corner 4f the tract described herein, 16, with a non - tangent curve to the right, having an arc of 23.55 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 °56'08 ", and a chord bears N 46 °07'44" E, a distance of 21.20 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING", For a point of tangency, 17. S 88'54'12" E, a distance of 123.19 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", fora point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 18. with a curve to the right, having an arc of34.89 feet, a radius of 41.00 feet, a delta of 48'45'44 and a chord hears S 64 °31'20' E, a distance of 33.85 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped " KF%V Surveying ", for a point of reverse curve, 19. with a curve to the left, having an are of 134.55 feet, a radius of 70.00 feet, a delta of 110'07'37', and a chord bears N 84 °47'44" E, a distance of 114.77" feet to a set 1 /Z" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a pointof reverse curve, 20. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 35.95 feet, a radius of41.00 feet, a delta of 50 °14'06 ", and a chord bears N 54'50'513" E, a distance of 34.81 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 21. N 79'58'01" E, a distance of 141,28 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped `KFW SU R.VEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, 22, with a curve to the left, having an arc of 205.73 feet, a radius of 580.00 feet, a delta of 20"14'23 ", and a chord bears N 69'4B'20' E, a distance of 244.65 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 23. N 59 °38'38" E, a distance of 120.10 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plas#c Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 24, with a curve to the right, having an arc of 23.56 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 °59'57 ", and a chord hears S 7S °21'23" E, a distance of 21.21 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stanaped " KFW SURVEYING ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 25. N 61 "1358" E, a distance of 50.02 feet to a set 1/2 " iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING' in a curve to the right, for an interior corner of the tract herein, 26. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 25,31 feet, a radius of 15.00 Feet, a delta of 96°41'04 ", and a chord bears N 17 °59'07" E, a distance of 22.41 feet to a sot 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KF'W SURVEYING" for a point oaf compound curve, 27. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 78.35 feet, a radius of 2 19.0 0 feet, a delta of 20''9'57 ", and a chord bears N 76 °34'38" E. a distance of 77.44 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", fora pointof tangency, 28. N 86"49'37° E, a distance of 38.99 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, 29, with a curve to the left, having art arc of 119.11 feet, a radius of 271.00 feet, a delta of 25 °10'58 ", and a chard bears N 74 °14'08" E, a distance of 118.15 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", far a point of tangency, 30. N 61 "3$'38" E, a distance of 50.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 250.16 acres more or less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and in accordance with a plat prepared by KFW Surveying. "Phis document was prepared under 22TAC663,21, dares not reflect the results of an on the ground :survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdiv ion for which it was prepared. "_ _ job Nn,: 12 -028 Prepared by: KFW Surveying Date: Novemher34, 2016 File: S:\Draw 2012%12 -028 Sedona Trails \doe}, FN 374,10 AC - Zoning � 2 sup 1113012016 Seale: 1 inch = 354 feet File: 41.14.ndp Tract 1: 41.1372 Acres, Closure: n00.0000e 0.00 fl. (11999999), Perimeter--7611 ft. 01 n63.1428e20,04 1$ s632839w 1542 02 00,1725e 693.64 19 s29 -4744e 855.50 03 s16.2853e 13.13 20 s60.121 Ow 105.58 04 sl6.3313e 48.11 21 n29A817w 193110 05 s23.1727e 44.61 22 s60.1135w 290,00 06 s23 -2558e 118.77 23 n29.4825w 224,64 07 s30 -4034e 170.90 24 n59,3306e 299.94 08 s28.0149e 153.41 25 n3O.2654w 8.00 09 s59, 4400w 266.38 26 n59.3306e 96.07 10 n30.1600w 80.00 27 s30.2654a 8.00 11 s59.4440w 294.56 28 n59.3306e 1204.83 12 Rt, r= 15 -00, arc= 13,91, chord= s86.1754w 13.42 29 n30.1727w9:00 13 L1, r- 60.00, arc =137.46, choral= .s47.1400w 109,31 14 Rt, r= 15.00, arc--13.91, chord= sOB.1006w 13 -42 15 s34.44O0w 179.17 16 Rt, r-370.00, arc=164.48, chord= s47,2808w 163.13 17 40.1216w 172.2$ Scale: 1 inch= 1102 feet File: 250.15.ndp Tract 1: 250.1527 Acres,, Closure: s32.2036e 0.02 R. (1)999999), Perime1erm21 tl1 f1. 100-21 1 ge 458.14 2 s59,379w 1089.48 3 00.1100e 1062.20 4 n80.0329e 1092.71 5 5302121 a 1739.48 6 559.1919w 174 9.17 7 s59.3956w 509.91 8s29,1926a 1598.70 9 s57,5051w 663.33 0 n30 -1113w 4800.86 1 n72.0715e 322.58 2 n76.0339e 419.95 13 n29.321 Ow 657.33 14 n55.5212w 94.72 15 n30.0733w 94.40 16 n20.4146w 253.94 17 n29,4626w 915.48 18 n64,3524e 771.95 19 s1 0.5505e 224.82 20 Rt, r= 15.00, arc = 23.48, chord= s33.5509w 21.16 21 al 0.4322e MM 22 R L r = 15.00, erc= 23.65, cihord-s56,0451 a 21.213 23 s1 0.5505e 32.61 24 Lt, r- 6130.00, arc = 398.52, chord =s27.4227e 392.84 25 s44.2949e 181.90 26 Lt, r- 590.00, arc= 10$.25, chord=s49A511 a 108.10 27 Rt, r- 15.00, arc =22.57, chord=s11.5417a 20.50 28 s58.4801e 50.00 29 RE, x15.00, arc =22.57, chcrd=n74.1815e 20.50 30 Lt, r-590.00, arc�270.95, chord=05.4450e 268.58 31 s88.5412e 128.30 32 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 23.58, chord= s43.5216e 21.23 33 s88.5631e 5040 34 Rt, r- 15.00, arc=23.55, chord= n46,0744a 21.20 35 s88.5412e 123.19 36 Ri, r= 41.00, arc-34A9. chord =s64.3120a 33.65 37 Lt, r-70_00,aro= 134.55, chord= nB4,4744e 114.77 38 Rr, r- 41,40, arc-35.95, chard= n54.5058e 34.81 35 n715801e 141,28 40 LL r= 580.00, arc = 205.73, chard= n69.4820e 204.65 41 n59.3838e 120.10 42 Rt, r- 15.40, are = 23.56, chord=s75.2123e 21.21 43 n61.1358e 50.02 44 Rt, ml 5.00, arc = 25.31, chord= n17.5907a 22.41 45 Lt, r= 219.00, arc--78.35, chord= n76.343Be 77.93 46 n86A937e 38,99 47 Lt, X271.00, arc =119 11, chord= n74.1408e 118.15 48 n61.3838e 50.96 1113012016 Exhibit B "The Property" [ sc"rEa crrr usa r - - y - v, $ / `aii f - f - r - - EE 9 QB i µ ,.. -..� I I - F' +8 Fne'1 i P - - - - IN a 1;naR1 LUr.1�l TOW 40 .. _ v A �S 14 FM I' f P� LL' R-A f PCaD �A r", m� R -R II R-A 4 Rif - -- II Wa., R A PrID -- -• -- - fir',! T- ° `�,"_ °'""" - -- •--+ "E-�--..._ J I — — — — ■ 08 PUGS i PUD ■ = ■ R -A r ■ L ' 1 ""'— ■ L �cATcw,u Z w 0 z uj w ¢ ¢r fn 0 W x L) W W Z W = LO -- N F D iJ w F-- GB GB i FFA r .,.,,,.M.lz .. a... THE CROSSVINE m.. BEXAR, COUNTY SCHERTZ, TX_ SHEET 1 ..,.,..°...,.........�,,,.,... s., a�.., s�..., o... m,....,,...,°.., ��,.,.....,°. as.».,., a......... e. ®.....m,.....�a.,,.m,.,..,... °°"' ,�,�,s OF 2 ----- -- ------- --------- ---- DVL ------- PRE PRE FIRE PRE DVL AE DVL F Ge Fn=_ f. ===Z= M j P L- R-A R-A ------- T R R-A LLI ---------- W 00 ,j LLJ Z a a uD PlJD L ------- aroma x _zi V) x _rr=- a� L) ❑ LU 00 cl. z 1211388 Lu PDD = q F u) > cn Lu V22326'. '12 411 2-n 3L,/l 1122464 112241?�.� 122463 . . . . . . . . ..... ..... D 11-A 112241',!' LO TIQNM LI)R6 M PDD 1 21 GM is I cn PDD 22"3 2 k 3 L o 7 �= 12243` 1_ 1122 ------------ THE CROSSVINE 122 1 12=2 11 M12 -A 112252 122 ; � Ft B EXAR, COUNTY SHEET 2 112L11 122526 POD' 1122476 --- SCHERTZ, TX. OF 2 Exhibit C "The Development Standards" cj THE � 3 CROSSVINE SCHERTZ TEXAS 78154 THE CROSSVINE PDD THIRD AMENDMENT 12 -28 -17 C� �j The Crossvine PDD Third Amendment The Sedona Trails PDD was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council of Schertz, Texas on January 24, 2012 (the " Sedona Trails PDD ") by Ordinance 12 -5 -01. The history and prior iterations of the Sedona Trails PDD are more specifically detailed and set forth in the preamble to the Sedona Trails PDD which was approved on January 24, 2012. The Sedona Trails PDD was subsequently amended by (i) Ordinance 12 -5 -16 on August 21, 2012 (the "First Amendment ") and (ii) Ordinance 14- 5-08 on March 11th, 2014 (the "Second Amendment "). The Sedona Trails PDD was renamed The Crossvine PDD and the First Amendment and the Second Amendment detailed and defined certain items referenced in the Sedona Trails PDD which were unresolved and primarily focused on (i ) Community and Public Amenity Standards, Architectural Design Standards for single - family residences, and related matters of clarification; and (ii) development matters associated with Module II (collectively, the Sedona Trails PDD, the First Amendment, and the Second Amendment are hereinafter referred to as "The Crossvine PDD "). As contemplated in The Crossvine PDD, this Amendment (the "Third Amendment ") is the continuation of the definition of the Overall Conceptual Master Plan and is primarily focused on the development of Garden Homes in Module II. For the purposes of this Third Amendment, defined terms set forth in The Crossvine PDD are hereby incorporated by reference and included herein and reference shall be made to The Crossvine PDD for specific elements which are not specifically defined or otherwise set forth herein. The Crossvine PDD remains in full force and effect with the exception of the matters addressed herein which shall be considered to be amendments to The Crossvine PDD. Elements, requirements, and conditions set forth in The Crossvine PDD shall be deemed to apply to those portions of the Property addressed by this Third Amendment unless specifically excluded, changed, or modified herein. Similarly, modifications or amendments set forth in this Third Amendment shall be deemed to modify any elements, requirements, or conditions of The Crossvine PDD unless specifically noted herein. The UDC for the City establishes certain requirements and standards for the development of Planned Development Districts. The version of the UDC (and regulations, fees, etc. associated therewith) applicable to the Project Area shall control all development standards except to the extent modified by this Third Amendment, The Crossvine PDD, or by the original Sedona PUD. Provisions of the UDC shall be interpreted to be consistent with The Crossvine PDD (as amended) and, in the event of any apparent conflict, the UDC shall be deemed amended to give full effect to The Crossvine PDD (as amended). 1 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 12 -28 -16 Amendments to The Crossvine PDD Section 2: Legal Description /Metes and Bounds; Scope of Third Amendment 2.1 Scope of this Third Amendment This Third Amendment shall only be applicable to those areas referenced and designated in the Zoning Exhibit and the associated legal descriptions included herewith as Exhibit 1, as part of this Third Amendment, unless the text herein clearly designates a more restrictive application of the terms of this Third Amendment. 2 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 Amendments to The Crossvine PDD Section 6: Module II 6.1 Purpose and Overview A portion of Module IIA (as previously defined in the Second Amendment) has been designated for the development of garden homes. The Crossvine PDD currently has two garden home configurations which have been permitted. This Third Amendment authorizes the development of a third garden home configuration which is designated as GH(3). GH(3) will be characterized by alley access to garages at the rear of the homes. The homes will generally front on a common greenbelt ( "Common Area Greenspace") which includes sidewalks to provide access to the homes. Guest parking along boulevards and in parking courts will access the greenbelts and provide visitor and owner access. This Third Amendment authorizes the lot size and configuration for the GH(3) residential product, road profiles for the alleys providing garage access to the homes and for the primary boulevard through the GH(3) Development Area, and also addresses utility and other infrastructure matters which are unique to the GH(3) Development Area. The perimeter roads which run from FM1518 to Hollering Vine (f /k /a Schnebly Drive) and separate the GH(3) Development Area from the single - family residential area in Module I and from the proposed multi- family, attached residential, and commercial area in the remainder of Module IIA shall be a minimum of a 60' Right of Way. 6.3 Conceptual GH(3) Land Plan - GH(3) Development Area (Exhibit 2) A representative land plan (the "Approved Conceptual GH(3) Land Plan ") associated with the GH(3) product is included as Exhibit 2 and is approved pursuant to this Third Amendment. The Approved Conceptual GH(3) Land Plan, the overall boundaries of the area intended to be developed with GH(3) garden homes (the "GH(3) Development Area "), Common Area Greenspaces, roadway configuration, and similar matters may change as drainage plans and other construction considerations are incorporated into the final land plan, however, the Approved Conceptual GH(3) Land Plan is representative of the overall configuration and the final Land Plan shall comply with the specific terms, conditions, and provisions set forth in this Amendment. 3 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 Amendments to The Crossvine PDD Section 8: Infrastructure Standards The following amendments to Section 8 apply to The Crossvine Project Area except to the extent specifically noted herein. All other provisions of The Crossvine PDD related to Infrastructure Standards shall remain in effect except as modified herein. 8.2 Roadways The roadway sections and profiles included as Exhibit 3, Exhibit 4, Exhibit 5, and Exhibit 6 ( "Roadway Exhibits ") are approved roadways in the Project Area as otherwise limited herein. Briefly described, these additional roadways are: 8.2.16 62' Boulevard The attached Exhibit 3 and Exhibit 4 illustrate a cross - section of a 62' Boulevard, including sidewalk and median areas incorporating a 62' ROW. Concrete sidewalks will be required on both sides of the 62' Boulevard with an 8' sidewalk on one side and a 5' sidewalk on the other side, and the sidewalks may abut the back of curb. The 62' Boulevard will include a raised median with a rollover curb. The rollover curb type shall be not less than 2 inches (2 ") in height. The median shall be composed of pavers, grass brick, or similar treatments which are capable of supporting emergency vehicles loads. Trees, bushes, grass, and other landscape materials (including mulch, landscape stones and gravel, paving stones, etc.), streetlights, or other permanent vertical improvements will not be allowed within the median area if they will compromise emergency vehicle access or the ability of the median to support emergency vehicle loads. There will be a drive aisle in each direction with parallel parking allowed on both sides of the 62' Boulevard. The curb at the edge of the streets will be a stand -up /monolithic curb with a minimum height of 6 ". Exhibit 3 represents a 12' drive aisle for each direction of traffic with a 7.5' median and Exhibit 4 represents a 13' drive aisle for each direction of traffic with a 5.5' median. The median area shall be maintained by The Crossvine Property Owner's Association. 8.2.17 56.5' Boulevard The attached Exhibit 5 illustrates a cross - section of a 56.5' Boulevard, including sidewalk areas incorporating a 56.5' ROW. Concrete sidewalks will be required on both sides of the 56.5' Boulevard with an 8' sidewalk on one side and a 5' sidewalk on the other side, and the sidewalks may abut the back of curb. The 56.5' Boulevard will not include a median. There will be a thirteen -foot (13') drive aisle in each direction with parallel parking allowed on both sides of the 56.5' Boulevard. The curb at the edge of the streets will be a stand -up /monolithic curb with a minimum height of 6 ". 8.2.18 22.5' Alley The attached Exhibit 6 illustrates a cross - section and profile of an Alley with a 22.5' ROW. These will be "one -way" private Alleys intended to provide entrance to the garage located at the rear of the garden home product (GH(3)) approved in this Third Amendment. The GH(3) garden home will front on a greenbelt with sidewalks and there will be no sidewalks associated with the Alley. Other elements of the alleys are: 8.2.18.1 The Alleys will provide for eighteen -inch (18 ") ribbon curbs on each side of the Alley; 8.2.18.2 The Alleys shall all be one -way with signage indicating such; 8.2.18.3 The Alleys may be asphalt or concrete; 4 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 8.2.18.4 The Alleys may be a traditional crowned street or an inverted crown with storm water facilities located under the Alley; 8.2.18.5 The Alleys will be private; 8.2.18.6 There will be no parking in the Alleys which shall be designated by appropriate red cautionary striping on the curbs (which shall be no less than 6" and no more than 9" in width), no parking signs, and shall be reflected as a note on the recorded plat; 8.2.18.7 Enforcement of the one -way restriction and no parking in the Alleys shall be by (i) HOA enforced towing of offending vehicles, and (ii) ticketing and /or towing by City law enforcement or regulatory authorities; 8.2.18.8 Alley lengths may be no more than 570 feet measured along the centerline of the Alley from the ROW of the streets which intersect with the alley; 8.2.18.9 All Alley entrances from intersecting roadways and any curve in the Alleys shall provide adequate turning radius to allow emergency services vehicles to enter and traverse the Alley; The attached Exhibit 7 and Exhibit 8 illustrate plan view representations of the Alley with a single lot and with multiple lots. 8.7 Sidewalks The following requirements apply exclusively to areas developed as a GH(3) Development Area. 8.7.1 Greenbelt Sidewalks (GH(3)) Garden homes located in the GH(3) Development Area front on a greenbelt or other Common Area Greenspace. Each GH(3) garden home shall have access from the front of such home to a sidewalk. Any sidewalk located in Common Area Greenspaces which are part of the GH(3) Development Area and are required as set forth herein, shall be concrete, and shall be a minimum of 4' wide (except for those sidewalks which are part of the 62' Boulevard which shall be as specified in Section 8.2.16). 8.7.2 Conformity (GH(3)) Any requirement in the UDC that all lots must have access to concrete sidewalks is amended to be in conformity with the provisions of this Third Amendment. 8.8 Parking Requirements (Garden Home) The following requirements apply exclusively to areas developed as a GH(3) Development Area. 8.8.4 Garage (GH(3)) Garden homes shall provide a garage with two parking spaces which are each no less than 10'x20' (total garage size of no less than 20' x 20'). 8.8.5 Driveways (GH(3)) The driveway into the garage of a GH(3) garden home shall be concrete and shall be an average minimum depth of no less than 3, and more specifically: 5 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 8.8.5.1 The length of each side of the driveway from face of garage to back of curb shall not be less than 3'. 8.8.6 Additional Parking Areas (GH(3)) 8.8.6.1 Additional parking within and adjacent to the GH(3) Development Area shall be provided equal to 1 additional parking space per garden home. 8.8.6.2 The additional parking may be satisfied by parallel parking areas along roadways adjacent to the GH(3) Development Area or by parking courts within or adjacent to the GH(3) Development Area. 8.8.6.3 The additional parking shall be located such that there are no more than six (6) GH(3) lots between any lot and an area with additional parking. 8.8.6.4 This additional parking requirement shall be exclusive of parking available within residential garage areas. 8.10 Utility Location (22.5' Alley and associated Common Area Greenspace) Utilities including water, waste water, storm sewer, dry utilities and treated effluent water may be placed in the Alley roadway or within the Common Area Greenspace. In order to maintain minimum separation distances and to ensure that the utilities can be serviced, generally no more than three utility types can be placed within the Alley roadway (e.g. water, storm sewer, and waste water). Dry utility conduit (e.g., electric, cable, data, gas, etc.) located within the roadway shall be installed by the Developer and /or his designated contractors or responsible parties and may require additional protection as determined at time of platting by the City Engineer or Director of Public Works. If dry utilities are placed adjacent to water or wastewater in the roadway, a minimum horizontal clearance of 5 feet shall be maintained from the edge of dry utility trench to the water or waste water line. Water, sanitary sewer, and treated effluent force main (if any) located underneath the roadway or in the Common Area Greenspace will have a minimum separation as required by TCEQ (see included Exhibits for approved representative utility placement and minimum separations). Additional engineering elements are included in this Section 8. 8.11 Fire Hydrant and Meter Location The following requirements apply exclusively to areas developed as a GH(3) Development Area. 8.11.1 Fire Hydrants (GH(3)) Fire hydrants may be located within any Public Utility Easement, any Common Area Greenspace, or in any such other area as may be designated by an approved site plan. Fire hydrants within any area where the land use is developed as GH(3)shall be located at intervals of no more than 300 feet. 8.11.2 Utility Meters (GH(3)) Utility meters may be located at each home (adjacent to Alley or located in the front of lot adjacent to Common Area Greenspace) or may be clustered in utility meter banks located in the Common Area Greenspace upon approval from each respective utility provider. 8.12 Repairs and Maintenance (GH(3)) The Developer shall provide that any Conditions, Covenants and Restrictions, any Declaration of Condominium Regime, any rules and regulations of any Property Owners' Association, or similar 6 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 instruments shall contain clear language that the City of Schertz or any other utility provider shall not be responsible for the repair or replacement of landscaping other than the normal turf grass or similar ground cover. 8.13 Drainage Easements Drainage easements (whether for underground drainage facilities or for surface drainage) shall be a minimum of ten feet (10') in width. 8.14 Offset Intersections 8.14.1 There shall be no requirement for minimum or maximum distance for intersections which are off- set when one of the intersecting roadways is an Alley. 8.14.2 The distance from the centerline of the Alley located closest to FM 1518 to the most proximate edge of the existing pavement of FM 1518 shall be not less than one hundred feet (100'). 8.15 Storm Sewer; Mains and Laterals 8.15.1 Storm Sewer Mains Any drainage lines that are to be maintained by the City shall be a minimum of eighteen inches (18 ") and constructed of reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). Any 18" diameter pipe will be designed so that the Hydraulic Grade Line of the appropriate storm event does not rise above the top of pipe. Pipes larger than 18" in diameter will be hydraulically designed in accordance with applicable standards found in the UDC and Public Works Design Manual. 8.15.2 Storm Sewer Laterals Storm sewer laterals shall be a minimum of 12" and shall be constructed of PVC, HDPE, or other appropriate materials. 8.16 Water Lines Cover over water lines shall be a minimum of forty -eight inches (48 "). In the event that 48" of cover cannot be achieved, consideration may be given to less cover, but in no case shall it be less than thirty -six inches (36 "). The final determination shall be made by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. Water mains under any pavement shall be constructed of ductile iron or other such material specifically approved by the City Engineer or Public Works Director. 8.17 Wastewater Manholes Wastewater manholes, when located in Alleys, shall require a minimum separation of 10' from the outside of the manhole to an adjacent allowable building pad location. 7 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 Amendments to The Crossvine PDD Section 9: Community and Public Amenity Standards The following amendments to Section 9 apply only to the land uses and roadways authorized or referenced in this Third Amendment except to the extent specifically noted herein. All other provisions of The Crossvine PDD related to Community and Public Amenity Standards shall remain in effect except as modified herein. 9.2 Landscape Design All Public Landscape requirements for land uses authorized in this Third Amendment to The Crossvine PDD are previously defined in Section 9.2.3 Public Screening and Landscaping of the Second Amendment to The Crossvine PDD unless otherwise set forth below. All Private Landscaping requirements for land uses authorized in this Third Amendment to The Crossvine PDD are defined in Section 9.2.12 Private Fencing and Landscaping and in Section 9.2.13 Land Use Transition Areas of the Second Amendment to The Crossvine PDD unless otherwise set forth below. 9.2.2 Public Lighting (GH(3)) Street lights in Module IIA may be of the type previously approved for Module I upon the same terms and conditions and shall be located at the intersection of all public roads and at roundabouts. Lighting provided by the developer at parking courts and in greenspace areas within the GH(3) Development Area may be of such approved street lights or may be separate diffused lighting to minimize glare to surrounding residences. 9.2.3 Public Screening and Landscaping (GH(3)) Public Screening and Landscaping requirements for Module IIA of The Crossvine are set forth in Section 9.2.3 of the Second Amendment. Such requirements remain in full force and effect except as amended or modified as set forth below. To the extent that reference is made to GH(1) or GH(2), the requirements set forth in Section 9.2.3 of the Second Amendment shall apply to GH(3) except as amended or modified as set forth below. 9.2.3.1 Public Screening and Landscaping Adjacent to FM 1518 9.2.3.1.4 Land Use — GH(3) A. When the land use adjacent to FM 1518 is GH(3), the Public Screening and Landscaping shall be located in the Common Area (described below). B. 100% of the linear length of the area designated for the development of GH(3) adjacent to FM 1518 from the ROW of intersecting roads and exclusive of driveways, curb cuts, and pedestrian access shall be Public Screening. C. The required Public Screening will be a minimum of 50% masonry wall with the remainder being Decorative Fencing as established by The Crossvine PDD (as amended), living landscaping, or a combination of Decorative Fencing and living landscaping. D. Public Screening (where required) will be a minimum of 6' tall and a maximum of 8' tall; provided however, trees and other vegetation which is part of the public screening shall achieve a height of 6' tall within 3 years. E. When the land use adjacent to FM 1518 is GH(3), a Common Area shall be established which includes and conforms to the following requirements: 1. This Common Area shall be a minimum of 15' in width from the ROW of FM 1518 along the entire frontage of FM 1518; 8 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 2. One tree will be planted for every 30 linear feet within the Common Area; 3. Required trees may be clustered in groups provided, however, there shall not be more than 90 linear feet between trees; 4. Except for requirements associated with living landscaping as part of the Public Screening, the remainder of the Common Area shall include mulch, decomposed granite, river rock, or similar decorative elements and trees, shrubs, grasses, sod, or any other approved plants in the UDC or The Crossvine PDD (as amended). F. Installation of all required landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed prior to the recording of the final plat. The developer may request the deferral of the installation of the landscaping until after the final plat recordation. Deferral of the installation of the required landscaping shall be conditioned on the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement and sufficient surety as determined by the City not to exceed 100% of the publicly bid cost for required Common Area landscaping. 9.2.3.3 Public Screening and Landscaping Adjacent to Hollering Vine (f /k /a Schnebly Drive) 9.2.3.3.2 Land Use — GH(3) A. When the land use adjacent to Hollering Vine is GH(3), the Public Screening and Landscaping shall be located in the Common Area (described below). B. 100% of the linear length of the area designated for the development of GH(3) adjacent to Hollering Vine from the ROW of intersecting roads and exclusive of driveways, curb cuts, and pedestrian access shall be Public Screening. C. The required Public Screening located within the Common Area shall be Decorative Fencing as established by The Crossvine PDD which shall be not less than four feet (4') in height. D. Where the land uses immediately adjacent to the east side of Hollering Vine are developed as GH(3), a Common Area shall be established which includes and conforms to the following requirements: 1. The Common Area shall be a minimum of 5' in width along the length of Hollering Vine abutting the GH(3) Development Area; 2. Houses which abut Hollering Vine will have a Common Area Greenspace which is no less than fifteen feet (15') located between the front property line and the 5' Common Area. 3. One tree shall be planted for every 30' of continuous linear feet of Common Area, 4. Required trees may be clustered in groups, provided, however, there shall not be more than 90 linear feet between trees; 5. Decorative Fencing shall have a 6" Crossvine plant every 36" OC. 6. Pedestrian access through the Common Area (from the sidewalk along Hollering Vine) to the Common Area Greenspace and the GH(3) Development Area shall be allowed. E. Installation of all required landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed prior to the recording of the final plat. The developer may request the deferral of the installation of the landscaping until after the final plat recordation. Deferral of the installation of the required landscaping shall be 9 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 conditioned on the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement and sufficient surety as determined by the City not to exceed 100% of the publicly bid cost for required Common Area landscaping. 9.2.3.7 Public Screening and Landscaping Adjacent to 60' Collector Road (as permitted by Section 8.2.2 and 8.2.4 of The Crossvine PDD) 9.2.3.7.4 Land Use — GH(3) A. When the land use adjacent to a 60' ROW is GH(3), there is no requirement for Public Screening. B. A Common Area shall be established adjacent to a 60' ROW which abuts a GH(3) Development Area which includes and conforms to the following requirements: 1. This Common Area shall be a minimum of 10' in width from the ROW along the length of the 60' ROW; 2. The Common Area shall be composed primarily of grasses or sod but may include landscape beds incorporating mulch, decomposed granite, river rock, or similar decorative elements and trees or shrubs, as well as any other approved plants in the UDC or The Crossvine PDD (as amended). C. Installation of all required landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed prior to the recording of the final plat. The developer may request the deferral of the installation of the landscaping until after the final plat recordation. Deferral of the installation of the required landscaping shall be conditioned on the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement and sufficient surety as determined by the City not to exceed 100% of the publicly bid cost for required Common Area landscaping. 9.2.3.10 Screening, Landscaping, and Decorative Elements in Roundabouts (The Crossvine Project Area) 9.2.3.10.4 Public Screening and Landscaping within Roundabouts located in The Crossvine project area shall not obscure vision in such a way as to create a traffic hazard. 9.2.3.10.5 Within a Roundabout, a Common Area shall be established which includes and conforms to the following requirements: A. The Common Area shall be comprised of the total Roundabout area except for those areas comprised of sidewalks, curbs, or similar features; B. The Common Area shall include mulch, decomposed granite, river rock, decorative concrete, paving stones, fountains, art installations, or similar decorative elements and trees, shrubs, grasses, sod, or any other approved plants in the UDC or The Crossvine PDD (as amended); provided, however, such features shall not obscure vision in such a way as to create a traffic hazard. 9.2.3.10.6 Installation of landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed concurrent with the completion of the Roundabout construction. 9.2.3.11 Adjustment of Location of Public Screening and Landscaping and Common Area (GH(3)) 9.2.3.11.2 If a land use abuts a roadway, greenspace, pocket park, mail kiosk, or Common Area, the required Public Screening and Landscaping and Common Area can be adjacent to the property line of the adjacent land use and need not be adjacent to the ROW line of any roadway or the property boundary of any greenspace, pocket park, mail kiosk, or Common Area. 10 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 9.2.3.12 Maintenance of Public Screening and Landscaping; Roadways 9.2.3.12.2 Maintenance of all Public Screening and Landscaping and Common Areas adjacent to roadways as noted above shall be the responsibility of The Crossvine Property Owners' Association. 9.2.3.13 Screening in Parking Courts (GH(3)) 9.2.3.13.5 Parking courts as permitted under The Crossvine PDD (as amended) within areas where the predominant land use is GH(3) must include Public Screening or Landscaping, which is intended to shield or obscure headlights of vehicles. The Public Screening around parking courts may be Masonry Walls, Decorative Fencing, landscape screening or a combination of the above. Decorative Fencing, if used, shall be a minimum of 4' tall and a maximum of 6' tall. 9.2.3.13.6 Parking courts as permitted under The Crossvine PDD (as amended) within areas where the predominant land use is GH(3) may be located within required Common Areas along Boulevards, Local Streets, Alleys, Collectors, or Arterials. 9.2.3.13.7 Installation and maintenance of all Public Screening and Landscaping and Common Areas adjacent to parking courts as noted above shall be the responsibility of The Crossvine Property Owners' Association. 9.2.3.13.8 Installation of all required landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed prior to the recording of the final plat. The developer may request the deferral of the installation of the landscaping until after the final plat recordation. Deferral of the installation of the required landscaping shall be conditioned on the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement and sufficient surety as determined by the City not to exceed 100% of the publicly bid cost for required Common Area landscaping. 9.2.3.14 Screening and Landscaping at Mail Kiosks, Pocket Parks, Common Area Greenspace, etc. (GH(3)) 9.2.3.14.3 There shall be no requirement for Public Screening of any areas owned and maintained by The Crossvine Property Owners' Association which is not otherwise required herein. Such areas may include mail kiosks, pocket parks, Common Area Greenspace, playscape areas, and similar areas and uses ( "Other POA Areas "). 9.2.3.14.4 Landscaping and Screening in Other POA Areas shall be composed primarily of grasses or sod but may include landscape beds incorporating mulch, decomposed granite, river rock, or similar decorative elements and trees or shrubs, as well as any other approved plants in the UDC or The Crossvine PDD (as amended). 9.2.3.15 Public Screening and Landscaping Adjacent to a Boulevard (as permitted by Section 8.2.16 and 8.2.17 of this Third Amendment) 9.2.3.15.1 Land Use — GH(3) A. The land use adjacent to a Boulevard is only permitted to be GH(3). B. There is no requirement for Public Screening adjacent to a Boulevard. C. A Common Area Greenspace shall be established adjacent to a Boulevard which includes and conforms to the following requirements: 1. This Common Area Greenspace shall be a minimum of 15' in width from the ROW along the length of the Boulevard; 2. The Common Area shall be composed primarily of grasses or sod but may include landscape beds incorporating mulch, decomposed granite, river rock, or similar decorative elements and trees or shrubs, 11 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 as well as any other approved plants in the UDC orThe Crossvine PDD (as amended). D. Installation of Landscaping within the Common Area shall be completed prior to the recording of the final plat. The developer may request the deferral of the installation of the landscaping until after the final plat recordation. Deferral of the installation of the required landscaping shall be conditioned on the execution of a subdivision improvement agreement and sufficient surety as determined by the City not to exceed 100% of the publicly bid cost for required Common Area landscaping 9.2.12 Private Fencing and Landscaping There shall be no requirement for Private Fencing or Landscaping for the land uses and roadways authorized or referenced in this Third Amendment except as required in this Third Amendment. Initial Private Fencing and Landscaping shall be provided by the Developer, builders, or their designated contractors and replacement or additional Private Fencing and Landscaping (as permitted herein) will be as approved by The Crossvine Property Owners' Association. The following provisions replace City of Schertz UDC Section 21.9.8 in its entirety for the land uses and roadways authorized or referenced in this Third Amendment. Private Fencing is the responsibility of and shall be maintained by the lot owner. 9.2.12.9 Private Fencing (GH(3)) 9.2.12.9.1 Where the land use is designated exclusively for the development of GH(3), no fences or other obstructions shall be allowed between houses except that fences will be allowed from the front corner of houses to the front corner of the adjacent house and from the back corner of houses to the back corner of the adjacent house as long as gates are provided in the fences. For lots located at the end of a row of lots where there is an adjacent house on only one side, the fence from the front corner of the house and the rear corner of a house may connect to a side yard fence located on the lot line that is not adjacent to another house. If fences are not provided as allowed above, fences are allowed to enclose the area between the house and Common Area Greenbelt provided they do not enclose the area that would include the area of the side yard setback that extends behind the house (See Exhibit 9). For the purposes of this section, allowable fences shall be Decorative Fence not to exceed five feet (5') in height. 9.2.12.9.2 Installation of Private Fencing (if elected) shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the improvements where Private Fencing is installed. 9.2.12.10 Private Landscaping (GH(3); Residential) 9.2.12.10.1 The front and side yard of each home shall primarily be grass. Bushes, bedding plants, landscape beds, landscape materials (e.g., mulch, landscape rocks, or similar decorative elements, etc.) and trees are permitted in the front and side yards of each home. 9.2.12.10.2 Areas not otherwise landscaped or areas not containing decks, patios, etc. shall include turf grasses, sod, or any other approved plants in the UDC or The Crossvine PDD (as amended). 9.2.12.10.3 All Decorative Fence shall have a 6" Crossvine plant every 36" OC. 9.2.12.10.4 Installation of Private Landscaping shall be completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the improvements where Private Landscaping is required. 12 The Crossvine PDD V Amendment 2 -28 -17 9.5 Signage The following amendments and modifications to permitted signage shall apply only to the GH(3) Development Area. 9.5.3.3 No Parking and One Way Signs No Parking and One Way Signs which are required in the Alleys as provided in this Third Amendment may be of a design and color consistent with the street signs and other community signage used in The Crossvine and shall be approved by the City. 13 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 Amendments to The Crossvine PDD Section 12: Land Use Allocations The following additional garden home development lot and product shall be permitted in The Crossvine: 12.2.1.1.4 Garden Home /GH(3) A. This category represents lots which will be improved with a detached single - family residence with a lot size that is no less than 3,300 square feet with minimum dimensions of 40' x 88, except that up to 10% of the lots may have a minimum width and depth of 38' x 86'. These residences will have a maximum DUE of one (1) per lot. The minimum dwelling size shall be 1,150 square feet and the maximum dwelling size shall be 2,650 square feet. The dimensional requirements of this Section are reiterated in the Land Use Dimensional Requirements Table (Exhibit 10). Homes may be either zero -lot line or be placed in the center of the lot. The minimum separation between adjacent structures, exclusive of eaves which may protrude 18" into the building separation area, and window sills, belt courses, cornices and other architectural features which may protrude 12" into the building separation, is no less than ten feet (10'). B. Additional requirements include: 1. The Common Area Greenspace shall be improved with a concrete sidewalk or sidewalks with a minimum of 4' in width to provide access to each home. 2. Fire hydrant spacing shall be no more than 300 feet. 3. Air - conditioning units or HVAC pads shall be located at the rear or side of the home except that only one HVAC unit /pad may be located between homes. Prior to filing a plat for the Garden Home GH(3) area, the developer shall submit for approval by the Fire Marshal a plan showing where the HVAC units /pads will be located. 4. Fencing shall be allowed as referenced in Section 9.2.12.9.1 of this Third Amendment and as described in Exhibit 9. S. The exterior wall of any zero lot line home which is less than 5' from the side property line shall have a 2 hour rated firewall. For centered homes, one of the adjacent walls shall have a 2 hour rated firewall. Prior to filing a plat for the Garden Home GH(3) area, the developer shall submit for approval by the Fire Marshal a plan showing which side will have the 2 hour rated firewall. 12.3 Land Use Dimensional Table (Exhibit 10) See Exhibit 10 attached hereto for additional information regarding front, rear, and side yard setbacks and related lot and development restrictions. 14 The Crossvine PDD 3rd Amendment 2 -28 -17 i����, I • • • . t • • • • �. • • • • - • • 41 . • G H IF t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j o 0 o d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of J� 6Po 0 oI o p o 0 0 0 0 0 r��.• -_a o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 01I -- d °o oo= o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l o�$o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.-'.-A" 0 0`�>-� cx � b o 0 0 0 0 0 �o d o o o o t o of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` -I F- �7a I��I o b pp o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `8-0 ° o oL� ° �PS $° °b °o °o °o °o °o °o° °o °o° 9- , c �Ep, �? O O O O 000C O O JO °O �' Off"• O O§ I `• J O b-4 O O 000 �I \' - IMIT O„OOnO — O---O- 4619'± TO IH 10 o_ I I i I I I 13 PDD -3 $ R -A ' I w R -A AMENDED N RANDOLPH 1 �- L IR FORCE BASE I' I A 3]4.10 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING COMPRISED OF THE 3 DIFFERENTTRACTS, OWNED BY SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BEING AN 82.80 S III V I B ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EXISTING POD /PUO AN 82.80 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF A 13.669 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN l qlr - - -J I ALL BEING OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF THE JERONIMO LEAL SURVEY NO. 79. ABSTRACT NO. 424 IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. II! I AMENDED PDD 374.10 AC. KFW ENGINEERS & SURVEYING 1 T F D Du .66 T 1 COUNTY BLOCK BE CUT F HE WEST PORTION FA A4 .14AGRE TRACT LAND,OUTOFTHEDTOS IAZ RVEY U TY OC E U O T ERA ONO .REC RD I i i PDD I, R -� San BLOCK i OF PACE UNIT 1, A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9583 PAGE 73 OF THE GEED AMID PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND SITUATED U PLAT 210-97 -8 4 B t. Phan. 979$444 exL i6 OF SEHA IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ BEXAR COUNTY, TE%AS- 1. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MATE, PANEL 4802900295 &,48029C0315F, DATED SEPT. 29,2010, A PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONES X & AE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 j o 0 o d 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 dp 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 of J� 6Po 0 oI o p o 0 0 0 0 0 r��.• -_a o 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 o O o 0 01I -- d °o oo= o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l o�$o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '.-'.-A" 0 0`�>-� cx � b o 0 0 0 0 0 �o d o o o o t o of 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0` -I F- �7a I��I o b pp o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 `8-0 ° o oL� ° �PS $° °b °o °o °o °o °o °o° °o °o° 9- , c �Ep, �? O O O O 000C O O JO °O �' Off"• O O§ I `• J O b-4 O O 000 �I \' - IMIT O„OOnO — O---O- 4619'± TO IH 10 o_ I I i I I I 13 PDD -3 $ R -A ' I w LOCATION MAP N T.S. LEGEND -- PROPOSED PDD ZONING BOUNDARY - - - - -- 200 FT. NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY — — — — EXISTING FEMA 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN — ••�••�••— PROPOSED 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN DEXISTING PDDIPUD POD 3RD AMENDMENT AREA O O EXISTING ZONING- PRE DEVELOPMENT (PRE) EXISTING ZONING - RESIDENTIAL,AGRICULTURAL (RA) EXISTING ZONING- GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) EXISTING ZONING- DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(DVL) ----------------- /0 l PIUD i PUD I { - -- -' - �r i R -A _ I -� I a �• r - -- --- I PUD ° i R -A/ 1 1\ / R -A R -A AMENDED N RANDOLPH 1 Poo L LOCATION MAP N T.S. LEGEND -- PROPOSED PDD ZONING BOUNDARY - - - - -- 200 FT. NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY — — — — EXISTING FEMA 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN — ••�••�••— PROPOSED 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN DEXISTING PDDIPUD POD 3RD AMENDMENT AREA O O EXISTING ZONING- PRE DEVELOPMENT (PRE) EXISTING ZONING - RESIDENTIAL,AGRICULTURAL (RA) EXISTING ZONING- GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) EXISTING ZONING- DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(DVL) ----------------- /0 l PIUD i PUD I { - -- -' - �r i R -A _ I -� I a �• r - -- --- I PUD ° i R -A/ 1 1\ / R -A R -A AMENDED N RANDOLPH Poo IR FORCE BASE WE A 3]4.10 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING COMPRISED OF THE 3 DIFFERENTTRACTS, OWNED BY SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BEING AN 82.80 S ACRE TRACT LYING NORTHWEST OF LOWER SEGUIN ROAD. A41.14 ACRE TRACT LYING SOUTHEAST OF LOWER SEGUIN ROAD AND A 250.16 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, B ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: EXISTING POD /PUO AN 82.80 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF A 13.669 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN l VOLUME 15542 PAGE 551, ALL OF A 34.007 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11492 PAGE 57 AND ALL OF A 35.182 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518. LTD, ATEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11492 PAGE 69 - AMENDED ALL BEING OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF THE JERONIMO LEAL SURVEY NO. 79. ABSTRACT NO. 424 IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. POD AMENDED PDD 374.10 AC. KFW ENGINEERS & SURVEYING 1 T F D Du .66 T 1 COUNTY BLOCK BE CUT F HE WEST PORTION FA A4 .14AGRE TRACT LAND,OUTOFTHEDTOS IAZ RVEY U TY OC E U O T ERA ONO .REC RD c/o Teresa A. Seidel, R.P.L.40 14803 Huebner Roatl, Bldg. 40 1PO TD INVO. MEI ,OUT F E TRAC 6 ACRETRAS OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ RECORD LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11465 PAGE 348, OUT OF THE WESTERLY PORTION OF A 122.533 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVENED SCHERTZ LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME PAGE 1926, AND ALL OF SCHNEBLY DRIVE, A 96' RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND LOT 56, NOTES: San BLOCK i OF PACE UNIT 1, A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9583 PAGE 73 OF THE GEED AMID PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND SITUATED U PLAT 210-97 -8 4 B t. Phan. 979$444 exL i6 OF SEHA IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ BEXAR COUNTY, TE%AS- 1. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MATE, PANEL 4802900295 &,48029C0315F, DATED SEPT. 29,2010, A PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONES X & AE TBPLS Firm No. 101223-00 A 250.16 ACRE TRACT OF LAND. OUT OF THE JULIAN DIAZ SURVEY NO. 66. ABSTRACT NO. 167. COUNTY BLOCK 5059. AND BEING OUT OF THE EASTERLY PORTION OF A 122.533 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11918 PAGE 1928, THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 10.00 ACRE TRACT OF 2. ALL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11918 PAGE 1922, THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 1.509 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. OWNER/DEVELOPER/APPLICANT: SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 16609 PAGE 193 ALL OF A 145.427 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11564 PAGE 1814, ALL OF A 91.288 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11601 PAGE 2280 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC SCHERTZ 1518, Ltd. RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF SEDONA LIFT STATION SUBDIVISION, A PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9611 PAGE 1680F THE LOCATION MAP N T.S. LEGEND -- PROPOSED PDD ZONING BOUNDARY - - - - -- 200 FT. NOTIFICATION BOUNDARY — — — — EXISTING FEMA 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN — ••�••�••— PROPOSED 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN DEXISTING PDDIPUD POD 3RD AMENDMENT AREA O O EXISTING ZONING- PRE DEVELOPMENT (PRE) EXISTING ZONING - RESIDENTIAL,AGRICULTURAL (RA) EXISTING ZONING- GENERAL BUSINESS (GB) EXISTING ZONING- DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT(DVL) ----------------- /0 l PIUD i PUD I { - -- -' - �r i R -A _ I -� I a �• r - -- --- I PUD ° i R -A/ 1 1\ / R -A EXHIBIT 1 z w 0 z w Uj Z_ Q Q� w 0 m co ow 0 C) ED wZ ED LIJ = z cf) � O O of 0 w F- �H �N U :! LL >=i mm, z° W 15H o K � 'r ¢'`aLL 3 00' SCALE: i " = /00' DESIGN BY: JBM THE CROSSVINE CHECKED BY: MV APPROVED BY: ORM BEXAR, COUNTY DATE. 11/2&2016 SCHERTZ, TX. SHEET 1 DATE OF SUBMITTAL. OF 2 11/23/2016 R -A LEGAL DESCRIPTION: A 3]4.10 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING COMPRISED OF THE 3 DIFFERENTTRACTS, OWNED BY SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, BEING AN 82.80 S ACRE TRACT LYING NORTHWEST OF LOWER SEGUIN ROAD. A41.14 ACRE TRACT LYING SOUTHEAST OF LOWER SEGUIN ROAD AND A 250.16 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, ALL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: —' AN 82.80 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, BEING ALL OF A 13.669 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN l VOLUME 15542 PAGE 551, ALL OF A 34.007 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD, A TEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11492 PAGE 57 AND ALL OF A 35.182 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518. LTD, ATEXAS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11492 PAGE 69 GROSS AREAINET AREA ALL BEING OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF THE JERONIMO LEAL SURVEY NO. 79. ABSTRACT NO. 424 IN BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. SURVEYOR: AMENDED PDD 374.10 AC. KFW ENGINEERS & SURVEYING 1 T F D Du .66 T 1 COUNTY BLOCK BE CUT F HE WEST PORTION FA A4 .14AGRE TRACT LAND,OUTOFTHEDTOS IAZ RVEY U TY OC E U O T ERA ONO .REC RD c/o Teresa A. Seidel, R.P.L.40 14803 Huebner Roatl, Bldg. 40 1PO TD INVO. MEI ,OUT F E TRAC 6 ACRETRAS OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ RECORD LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11465 PAGE 348, OUT OF THE WESTERLY PORTION OF A 122.533 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVENED SCHERTZ LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME PAGE 1926, AND ALL OF SCHNEBLY DRIVE, A 96' RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND LOT 56, NOTES: San BLOCK i OF PACE UNIT 1, A SUBDIVISION PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9583 PAGE 73 OF THE GEED AMID PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND SITUATED U PLAT 210-97 -8 4 B t. Phan. 979$444 exL i6 OF SEHA IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ BEXAR COUNTY, TE%AS- 1. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MATE, PANEL 4802900295 &,48029C0315F, DATED SEPT. 29,2010, A PORTION OF THIS TRACT IS LOCATED IN ZONES X & AE TBPLS Firm No. 101223-00 A 250.16 ACRE TRACT OF LAND. OUT OF THE JULIAN DIAZ SURVEY NO. 66. ABSTRACT NO. 167. COUNTY BLOCK 5059. AND BEING OUT OF THE EASTERLY PORTION OF A 122.533 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11918 PAGE 1928, THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 10.00 ACRE TRACT OF 2. ALL PRIVATE OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11918 PAGE 1922, THE REMAINING PORTION OF A 1.509 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO ETC. ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. OWNER/DEVELOPER/APPLICANT: SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 16609 PAGE 193 ALL OF A 145.427 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11564 PAGE 1814, ALL OF A 91.288 ACRE TRACT OF LAND AS CONVEYED TO SCHERTZ 1518, LTD OF RECORD IN VOLUME 11601 PAGE 2280 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC SCHERTZ 1518, Ltd. RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND ALL OF LOT 1, BLOCK 1 OF SEDONA LIFT STATION SUBDIVISION, A PLAT OF RECORD IN VOLUME 9611 PAGE 1680F THE 3. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR C/0 ChdstOpheT K. PdOe DEED AND PLAT RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY. TEXAS AND SITUATED IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DO NOT SETTHE ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS 314 E. Commerce St. DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT. Suite 600 4. TOPOGRAPHY IS ESTABLISHED AT 2 FOOT CONTOURS. San Antonio, TX. 78205 Phone: 210- 226 -6843 5. APZ IS SHOWN IN APPROXIMATE LOCATION. EXHIBIT 1 z w 0 z w Uj Z_ Q Q� w 0 m co ow 0 C) ED wZ ED LIJ = z cf) � O O of 0 w F- �H �N U :! LL >=i mm, z° W 15H o K � 'r ¢'`aLL 3 00' SCALE: i " = /00' DESIGN BY: JBM THE CROSSVINE CHECKED BY: MV APPROVED BY: ORM BEXAR, COUNTY DATE. 11/2&2016 SCHERTZ, TX. SHEET 1 DATE OF SUBMITTAL. OF 2 11/23/2016 AN EXHIBIT 1 19W 374.10 ACRES SURVEYING A 374.10 acre tract of land, being comprised of the 3 different tracts, owned by Schertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership, Tract 1, an 82.80 acre tract lying northwest of Lower Seguin Road, Tract 2, a 41.14 acre tract lying southeast of Lower Seguin Road and Tract 3, a 250.16 acre tract, all being more particularly described as follows: TRACT 1 A 82.80 acre tract of land, being all of a 13.669 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership of record in Volume 15542 Page 551, a 34.007 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership of record in Volume 11492 Page 57 and a 35.182 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD, a Texas limited partnership of record in Volume 11492 Page 69 all being of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and being out of the Jeronimo Leal Survey No. 79, Abstract No. 424 in Bexar County, Texas, and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument Type 2 in the southwest right - of -way of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way, and in a northeast line of the 125.0 acre tract and for the northeast corner of a 1.00 acre tract of land conveyed to Ruby J. Isaacks Newman of record in Volume 6505 Page 630 of the Deed Records of Bexar County, Texas and for an easterly southeast corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 59 °37'43" W along and with the north line of the 1.00 acre tract and a south line of the 13.52 acre tract, a distance of 143.14 feet to a found iron pipe for the northwest corner of the 1.00 acre tract and an interior corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 10 °11'17" E along and with the west line of the 1.00 acre tract and an east line of the 13.52 acre tract, a distance of 334.32 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northwest right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road, a variable width right -of -way, for the southwest corner of the 1.00 acre tract and the southerly southeast corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the northwest right -of -way line of the Lower Seguin Road and the southeast line of the 13.52 acre tract and 35.182 acre tract the following calls and distances: 1. S 60 °08'45" W, a distance of 1045.35 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the southeast corner of the 35.182 acre tract and for the southwest corner of the 13.52 acre tract and the tract described herein, 2. S 60 008'36" W, a distance of 24.70 feet to a found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument Type 1, for an angle point, and 3. S 59 °07'14" W, a distance of 800.04 feet to a found Texas Department of Transportation Concrete Monument Type 1 for the southwest corner of the 35.182 acre tract and for the southwest corner the tract described herein; THENCE: N 30 °16'36" W along and with a southwest line of the 35.182 acre tract and the northeast line of a 4.494 acre tract of record in Volume 11946 Page 2467, a 1.537 acre tract of record in Volume 3162 Page 937, a 1.04 acre tract, also called parcel 3, and a 1.04 acre tract, also called parcel 2, of record in Volume 8830 Page 1933 all being of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and tracts 20 thru 18, the remaining [ *:4aI.1101 portions of tract 17 and 16 of record in Volume 6800 Pages 47 -50 of the Windy Acres Subdivision of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of 1874.89 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the southwest corner of a 25.62 acre tract of record in Volume 6105 Page 506 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the northwest corner of the 35.182 acre tract, for the northwest corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 59 °48'14" E along and with a southeast line of the 25.62 acre tract and the northeast line of the 35.182 acre tract, a distance of 814.44 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for the northwest corner of a 6.00 acre tract of record in Volume 14786 Page 1862 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the northeast corner of the 35.182 acre tract, for the northeasterly corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 30 °35'24" E along and with a southwest line of the 6.00 acre tract and the northeast line of the 35.182 acre tract, a distance of 351.18 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod with cap stamped "BLS 2024" for the southwest corner of a 6.00 acre tract and the northwest corner of the 34.007 acre tract, for an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 59 °43'27" E along and with the southwest line of the 6.00 acre tract and continuing along the southwest line of the remaining portion of a 6.00 acre tract of record in Volume 10454 Page 2118 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the northwest line of the 34.007 acre tract, a distance of 1482.30 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod on the southwest right-of-way line of F.M. 1518 for the southeast corner of remaining portion of a 6.00 acre tract and the northeast corner of the 34.007 acre tract, for the northeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with a southwest right -of -way line of F.M. 1518 and the northeast line of the 34.007 acre tract and the 13.52 acre tract, the following calls and distances: 1. S 30 °07'55" E, a distance of 250.24 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, and 2. with a curve to the right having a radius of 2825.00 feet, an arc of 977.41 feet, a delta of 19 °49'24 ", and a chord bears S 20 °12'26" E, a distance of 972.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 82.80 acres more or less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being described in accordance with an exhibit prepared by KFW Surveying. TRACT 2 A 41.14 acre tract of land, out of the Julian Diaz Survey No. 66, Abstract No. 187, County Block 5059, and being out of the westerly portion of a 100.966 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11465 Page 348, out of the westerly portion of a 122.533 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11918 Page 1926, and all of Schnebly Drive, a 96' right -of -way, Lot 1, Block 7 and Lot 56, Block 1 of Sedona Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Volume 9583 Page73 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and situated in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a found 1h" iron rod with "DMC" Cap in the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road, a variable width right -of -way, where it intersects with the southwest right -of -way line of Trainer Hale Road and for the northerly corner of Lot 2, Block 7 of the Sedona Unit No. 1, a subdivision of record in Volume 9583 Pages 73 — 78 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and for the northerly corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 63 °10'28" E over and across Trainer Hale Road along and with the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road, at a distance of 20.04 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW EXHIBIT 1 SURVEYING ", for the southwest corner of a 1.879 acre tract conveyed to Timothy C. Knotts of record in Volume 9312 Page 804 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 30 °17'25" E along and with the northeast line of Trainer Hale Road and the southwest line of the remaining portion of the 1.879 acre tract, a distance of 693.64 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the southwest right -of -way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way, for an angle point; THENCE: along and with the southwest line of the southwest right-of-way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way and the northeast line of the 100.966 acre tract the following six (6) courses: 1. S 16° 28' S3" E, a distance of 13.13 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, 2. S 16° 33' 13" E, a distance of 48.11 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for an angle point, 3. S 23 °17' 27" E, a distance of 44.61 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, 4. S 23° 25' 58" E, a distance of 118.77 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, S. S 30° 40'34" E, a distance of 170.90 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for an angle point, and 6. S 28° 01'49" E, a distance of 153.01 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northeast line of the 100.966 acre tract, for the northwest corner of a variable width right -of -way dedication of record in Crossvine Modulel, Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Volume 9668 Pages 176 -182 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and the southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the northwest line of Lot 35, Block 5, the northwest and northeast line of Trellis Walk, a 60' right -of -way, of the Crossvine Module 1, Unit 1 southwest right-of-way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way and the northeast line of the 100.966 acre tract and a northeast line of the 122.533 acre tract of land conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD, the following ten (10) courses: 1. S 59° 44'00" W, a distance of 266.38 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the northeast line of Trellis Walk, for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 2. N 30° 16'00" W, a distance of 60.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for the northeast corner of Trellis Walk and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 3. S 59° 44'00" W, a distance of 294.56 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 4. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 13.91 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 53° 07'48", and a chord bears S 86° 17' 54" W, a distance of 13.42 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of reverse curvature of the tract described herein, 5. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 137.46 feet, a radius of 60.00 feet, a delta of 131° 15' 37 and a chord bears S 47° 14' 00" W, a distance of 109.31 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of reverse curve, 6. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 13.91 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 53° 07'48", and a chord bears S 08° 10' 06" W, a distance of 13.42 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of tangency, [CH:11•]k61 7. S 34° 44'00" W, a distance of 179.17 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 8. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 164.48 feet, a radius of 370.00 feet, a delta of 250 28' 16 ", and a chord bears N 47° 28' 08" E, a distance of 163.13 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for a point of tangency, 9. S 60° 12' 16" W, a distance of 172.28 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" for an angle point of the tract described herein, and 10. S 630 28'39" W, a distance of 15.02 feet to a point in the northeast right -of -way line of Schnebly Drive and the southeast, for the intersection of Trellis Walk with Schnebly Drive and an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the southwest and northwest boundary line of Crossvine Modulel, Unit 1 and the northeast and southeast right -of -way line of Schnebly Drive the following two (2) courses: 1. S 29° 47'44" E, a distance of 855.50 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a southeast corner of the tract described herein, and 2. S 60° 12' 16" W, a distance of 105.58 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" in the northeast line of Block 2 of Sedona Unit 1, for the southwest corner of Schnebly Drive and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the northeast right -of -way line of Schnebly Drive and the southeast and southwest lines of Lot 56 into and across the Sedona Unit No. 1 the following three (3) courses: 1. N 29 °48'17" W, a distance of 1931.10 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for the southeast corner of Lot 56 and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 2. S 60° 11'35" W, a distance of 290.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for the southwest corner of Lot 56 and a westerly corner of the tract described herein, and 3. N 29° 48'25" W, a distance of 224.64 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road, for the northwest corner of Lot 56 and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the southeast right -of -way line of Lower Seguin Road and with the north and northwest Sedona Unit No. 1 subdivision plat the following six (6) courses: 1. N 59° 33'06" E, a distance of 299.94 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 2. N 30° 26' 54" W, a distance of 8.00 feet to a found "X" in concrete, for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 3. N 59° 33' 06" E, a distance of 96.07 feet to a found "X" in concrete, for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 4. S 300 26'54" E, a distance of 8.00 feet to a found Y2" iron rod with "DMC" cap, for an interior corner of the tract described herein, S. N 59° 33'06" E, a distance of 1204.83 feet to a found Y2" iron rod with "DMC" Cap, for the northwest corner of Lot 2, Block 7 of Sedona Unit 1 and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 1W14:II 0.1101 6. N 30° 17' 27" W, a distance of 8.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 41.14 acres more or less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being described in accordance with an exhibit prepared by KFW Surveying. TRACT 3 A 250.16 acre tract of land, out of the Julian Diaz Survey No. 66, Abstract No. 187, County Block 5059, and being out of the easterly portion of a 122.533 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11918 Page 1926, the remaining portion of a 10.00 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11918 Page 1922, the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 16609 Page 193 all of a 145.427 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11564 Page 1814, all of a 91.288 acre tract of land as conveyed to Schertz 1518, LTD of record in Volume 11601 Page 2280 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and all of Lot 1, Block 1 of Sedona Lift Station Subdivision, a plat of record in Volume 9611 Page 168 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and situated in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a set 1h" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", in the southwest right -of- way line of F.M. 1518, a variable width right -of -way, for the southeast corner of a 20 foot right -of -way dedication by the Proposed Crossvine Module 1, Unit 2, a subdivision plat this day called, the north corner of the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract of land and for the northeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 30 °21'19" E, along and with the southwest right -of -way line of F.M. 1518, the northeast line of the remaining portion of a 1.509 acre tract, the remaining portion of a 10.00 acre tract and the 122.533 acre tract, a distance of 458.14 feet to a found W iron rod with a cap stamped "VICKREY PROP COR ", for a southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: with a southeast line of the 122.533 acre tract and the northwest, southwest and southeast lines of Lot 1, Block 1 Washington, Tyrannus School of the Arts, a subdivision of record in volume 9616 Page 24 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas and a northeast and a northwest line of the 145.427 acre tract, the following three (3) courses: 1. S 59° 37' 09" W, at a distance of 20.00 feet passing the north corner of Lot 1, Block 1 and continuing for a total distance of 1089.48 feet to a found PK Nail for the west corner of Lot 1, Block 1, in the northeast line of the 145.427 acre tract, a south corner of the 122.533 acre tract and an interior corner of the tract described herein; 2. S 30° 11'00" E, a distance of 1062.20 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod for the south corner of Lot 1, Block 1, an interior corner of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein, and 3. N 60" 03' 29" E, at a distance of 1072.71 feet passing the east corner of Lot 1, Block 1 and continuing for a total distance of 1092.71 feet to a found iron pipe in the southwest right -of -way line of FM 1518 for the northeast corner of the 145.427 acre tract and an easterly corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 30° 21'21" E with the southwest right -of -way line of FM 1518, a northeast line of the 145.427 acre tract and with a northeast line of Lot 1, Block 1, Sedona Lift Station Subdivision of record in Volume 9611 Page 168 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of 1739.48 feet to a point for the northeast corner of a 10.00 acre tract of land conveyed to Ernestina Navarro of record in Volume 13868 Page 1327 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and for the southeast corner of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein; EXHIBIT 1 THENCE: S 59° 19' 19" W with the northwest line of the 10.00 acre Navarro tract and a southeast line of the 145.427 acre tract, a distance of 1749.17 feet passing a found W iron rod for the northwest corner of the 10.00 acre Navarro tract and an angle point in the southeast line of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 59° 39'56" W with the with the northwest line of a 9.968 acre tract, called Exhibit B, conveyed to Jennifer J. and Edward M. Varelans of record in Volume 10054 Page 1692 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas and continuing with a southeast line of the 145.427 acre tract, a distance of 509.91 feet to a found iron rod in a northeast line of the 91.288 acre tract for the northwest corner of the 9.968 acre Varelans tract and an interior corner of the 145.427 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 29° 19' 26" E with the with the southwest line of a 9.968 acre tract and a northeast line of the 91.288 acre tract, a distance of 1598.70 feet to a found Y2" iron rod in the northwest right -of -way line of Ware - Seguin Road, a variable width right -of -way and for the southeast corner of the 91.288 acre tract and the most southerly southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 57° 50'51" W with the northwest right -of -way line of Ware - Seguin Road and the southeast line of the 91.288 acre tract and the southeast corner of a 297.520 acre tract of land conveyed to Schertz 1518., LTD of record in Volume 11601 Page 2285 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas, a distance of 663.33 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying' for the southwest corner of the 91.288 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: N 30° 11'13" W with the southwest line of the 91.288 acre tract and the northeast line of the 297.520 acre tract, a distance of 4800.86 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying', for the southwest corner of a 16.17 acre tract of land conveyed to 3GG Properties, LLC of record in Volume 17448 Page 1341 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas, a northwest corner of the 91.288 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the common lines of the 16.17 acre tract and the 91.288 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 72 °07'15" E, a distance of 322.58 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an angle point of the tract described herein, and 2. N 76 °03'39" E, a distance of 419.95 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying' in the southwest line of the 145.427 acre tract, for the southeast corner of the 16.17 acre tract, the northeast corner of the 91.288 acre tract and an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the common lines of the 16.17 acre tract, the 145.427 acre tract and the remaining portion of the 91.288 acre tract, the following four (4) courses: 1. N 29 °32'10" W, a distance of 657.33 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying', for an angle point of the tract described herein, 2. N 55 °52'12" W, a distance of 94.72 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying', for an angle point of the tract described herein, 3. N 30 °07'33" W, a distance of 94.40 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying', for an angle point of the tract described herein, and 4. N 20 °41'48" W, a distance of 253.94 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying" in the southwest line of the 122.533 acre tract, for the southeast corner of Lot 4, N.C.B 16560 of the Greaves Subdivision, a plat of record in Volume 9615 Page 53 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, a northeast corner of the 16.17 acre tract and an angle point of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 29'46'26" W, along and with a southwest line of the 122.533 acre tract and northeast line of Lot 4, a distance of 915.48 feet to point in the centerline of the Humble Pipeline Easement of record in Volume 4725 Page 616 of the Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas, for the northwest corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: N 64 °35'24" E, into and across the 122.533 acre tract and along and with the centerline of the Humble Pipeline Easement, a distance of 771.95 feet to a point in the north line of Lot 2, Block 2 of the Crossvine Module 1, Unit 1, a subdivision plat of record in Volume 9668 Pages 176 -182 of the Deed and Plat Records of Bexar County, Texas, the southwest right -of -way line of proposed Hollering Vine, a 60' right- of-way of the Proposed Crossvine Module 1, Unit 2, for the northeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: along and with the proposed Hollering Vine, into and across the 122.533 acre tract, the 145.427 acre tract, the 10.00 acre tract and the 1.5019 acre tract, the following thirty-nine (39) courses: 1. S 10 °55'05" E, a distance of 224.82 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 2. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 23.48 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 °40'28 ", and a chord bears S 33 °55'09" W, a distance of 21.15 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 3. S 10 °43'22" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein; 4. with a non - tangent curve to the right, having an arc of 23.65 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 90 °19'32 ", and a chord bears S 56 °04'51" E, a distance of 21.27 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency of the tract described herein, 5. S 10 °55'05" E, a distance of 32.61 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein 6. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 398.52 feet, a radius of 680.00 feet, a delta of 33 °34'44 ", and a chord bears S 27 °42'27" E, a distance of 392.84 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 7. S 44 °29'49" E, a distance of 181.90 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, B. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 108.25 feet, a radius of 590.00 feet, a delta of 10 °30'44 ", and a chord bears S 49 °45'11" E, a distance of 108.10 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of reverse curvature, 9. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 22.57 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 86 °12'33 ", and a chord bears S 11 °54'17" E, a distance of 20.50 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 10. S 58 048'01" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" in a curve to the right, for an interior of the tract described herein, [CH:11•3k01 11. with a non - tangent curve to the right, having an arc of 22.57 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 86 012'33 ", and a chord bears N 74 °18'15" E, a distance of 20.50 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of revers curvature of the tract described herein, 12. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 270.95 feet, a radius of 590.00 feet, a delta of 26 °18'44 ", and a chord bears S 75 044'50" E, a distance of 268.57 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 13. S 88 054'12" E, a distance of 128.30 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 14. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 23.58 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 90 °03'52 ", and a chord bears S 43 °52'16" E, a distance of 21.23 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 15. S 88 °56'31" E, a distance of 50.00 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" in a curve to the right, for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 16. with a non- tangent curve to the right, having an arc of 23.55 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 °56'08 ", and a chord bears N 46 °07'44" E, a distance of 21.20 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of tangency, 17. S 88 054'12" E, a distance of 123.19 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 18. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 34.89 feet, a radius of 41.00 feet, a delta of 48 °45'44 ", and a chord bears S 64 °31'20" E, a distance of 33.85 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of reverse curve, 19. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 134.55 feet, a radius of 70.00 feet, a delta of 110 °07'37 ", and a chord bears N 84 °47'44" E, a distance of 114.77 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of reverse curve, 20. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 35.95 feet, a radius of 41.00 feet, a delta of 50 °14'06 ", and a chord bears N 54 °50'58" E, a distance of 34.81 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 21. N 79 058'01" E, a distance of 141.28 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, 22. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 205.73 feet, a radius of 580.00 feet, a delta of 20 °19'23 ", and a chord bears N 69 °48'20" E, a distance of 204.65 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 23. N 59 038'38" E, a distance of 120.10 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the right of the tract described herein, 24. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 23.56 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 89 °59'57 ", and a chord bears S 75 °21'23" E, a distance of 21.21 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 25. N 61 013'58" E, a distance of 50.02 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING" in a curve to the right, for an interior corner of the tract herein, [ *:1:1I.1k61 26. with a curve to the right, having an arc of 25.31 feet, a radius of 15.00 feet, a delta of 96 °41'04 ", and a chord bears N 17 °59'07" E, a distance of 22.41 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of compound curve, 27. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 78.35 feet, a radius of 219.00 feet, a delta of 20 °29'57 ", and a chord bears N 76 °34'38" E, a distance of 77.94 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 28. N 86 049'37" E, a distance of 38.99 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW SURVEYING ", for a point of curvature to the left of the tract described herein, 29. with a curve to the left, having an arc of 119.11 feet, a radius of 271.00 feet, a delta of 25 °10'58 ", and a chord bears N 74 °14'08" E, a distance of 118.15 feet to a set 1/2" iron rod with Blue Plastic Cap Stamped "KFW Surveying ", for a point of tangency, 30. N 61 038'38" E, a distance of 50.98 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 250.16 acres more or less, in the City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas and in accordance with a plat prepared by KFW Surveying. "This document was prepared under 22TAC663.21, does not reflect the results of an on the ground survey, and is not to be used to convey or establish interests in real property except those rights and interests implied or established by the creation or reconfiguration of the boundary of the political subdivi ion for which it was prepared." f � Job No.: 12 -028 OF Prepared by: KFW Surveying T Date: November 30, 2016 File: S: \Draw 2012 \12 -028 Sedona Trails \doc\ FN 374.10 AC - Zoning k sulk [ *:1:119.11 W 11/30/2016 Scale: 1 inch= 354 feet File: 41.14.ndp Tract 1: 41.1372 Acres, Closure: n00.0000e 0.00 ft. (1/999999), Perimeter -7611 ft. 01 n63.1028e 20.04 18 s63.2839w 15.02 02 s30.1725e 693.64 19 s29.4744e 855.50 03 s16.2853e 13.13 20 s60.1216w 105.58 04 s1 6.3313e 48.11 21 n29.4817w 1931.10 05 s23.1727e 44.61 22 s60.1135w 290.00 06 s23.2558e 118.77 23 n29.4825w 224.64 07 s30.4034e 170.90 24 n59.3306e 299.94 08 s28.0149e 153.01 25 n30.2654w 8.00 09 s59.4400w 266.38 26 n59.3306e 96.07 10 n30.1600w 60.00 27 s30.2654e 8.00 11 s59.4400w 294.56 28 n59.3306e 1204.83 12 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 13.91, chord= s86.1754w 13.42 29 n30.1727w 8.00 13 Lt, r- 60.00, arc = 137.46, chord= s47.1400w 109.31 14 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 13.91, chord= s08.1006w 13.42 15 s34.4400w 179.17 16 Rt, r= 370.00, arc = 164.48, chord= s47.2808w 163.13 17 s60.1216w 172.28 EXHIBIT 11/30/2016 Scale: 1 inch= 337 feet File: 82.80.ndp Tract 1: 82.8043 Acres, Closure: n00.0000e 0.00 ft. (1/999999), Perimeter -8098 ft. 01 s59.3743w 143.14 10 s30.O755e 250.24 02 s10.1117e 334.32 11 Rt, r= 2825.00, arc = 977.41, chord= s20.1226e 972.54 03 s60.O845w 1045.35 04 s60.O836w 24.70 05 s59.0714w 800.04 06 n30.1636w 1874.89 07 n59.4814e 814.44 08 s30.3524e 351.18 (Scale: 1 inch= 1102 feet (File: 250.16.ndr) 1: 250.1527 Acres, Closure: s32.2036e 0.02 ft. (1/999999), Perimeter -21111 ft. 01 s30.2119e 458.14 02 s59.3709w 1089.48 03 s30.1100e 1062.20 04 n60.O329e 1092.71 05 s30.2121 a 1739.48 06 s59.1919w 1749.17 07 s59.3956w 509.91 08 s29.1926e 1598.70 09 s57.5051w 663.33 10 n30.1113w 4800.86 11 n72.0715e 322.58 12 n76.0339e 419.95 13 n29.3210w 657.33 14 n55.5212w 94.72 15 n30.O733w 94.40 16 n20.4148w 253.94 17 n29.4626w 915.48 18 n64.3524e 771.95 19 s10.5505e 224.82 20 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 23.48, chord= s33.5509w 21.16 21 s10.4322e 50.00 22 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 23.65, chord= s56.0451e 21.28 23 s10.5505e 32.61 24 Lt, r- 680.00, arc = 398.52, chord= s27.4227e 392.84 25 s44.2949e 181.90 26 Lt, r- 590.00, arc = 108.25, chord=s49.451 1 e 108.10 27 Rt, r= 15.00, arc = 22.57, chord= s11.5417e 20.50 28 s58.4801 a 50.00 29 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 22.57, chord= n74.1815e 20.50 30 Lt, r= 590.00, arc = 270.95, chord= s75.4450e 268.58 31 s88.5412e 128.30 32 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 23.58, chord= s43.5216e 21.23 33 s88.5631 a 50.00 34 Rt, r- 15.00, arc= 23.55, chord= n46.0744e 21.20 35 s88.5412e 123.19 36 Rt, r- 41.00, arc = 34.89, chord= s64.3120e 33.85 37 Lt, r- 70.00, arc = 134.55, chord= n84.4744e 114.77 38 Rt, r- 41.00, arc = 35.95, chord= n54.5058e 34.81 39 n79.5801 a 141.28 40 Lt, r- 580.00, arc = 205.73, chord= n69.4820e 204.65 41 n59.3838e 120.10 42 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 23.56, chord= s75.2123e 21.21 43 n61.1358e 50.02 44 Rt, r- 15.00, arc = 25.31, chord= n17.5907e 22.41 45 Lt, r- 219.00, arc = 78.35, chord= n76.3438e 77.93 46 n86.4937e 38.99 47 Lt, r- 271.00, arc = 119.11, chord= n74.1408e 118.15 48 n61.3838e 50.98 EXHIBIT 11/30/2016 EXHIBIT 3 GHM W J W W � _ _ �2 moo LLI Y cl ° � � '* Z r m� o J Ora Q LLI Y Z o a �,- MOa o J LL nnoa W C} w ° 0 J W (� O J Z r < U W W Ur I I QQ JW w QY ()w Q < cr 1 U) oa �OU)ix as QU w U QU m m aZ w w w c=n Q� w Q U) ° J Q Q 0 >- w w 0 z H N W z w F- ti Q m W r� ODD Cl) Q' Nw ^ O w p O Q r> M Q Z ° U cr Q 0 w U �J V LLI 3:0 (o °w w¢ 0 > oa cn "`�¢w of coo z Z p Of (Y — p `� �a� w w4 a wQ U) w m W Q Q w Q W zQ Q J r� J J m a� F- =a O (V a Z w J J Q O ~� J W OQp O U) > F- �p U > 8 >C7 m NQ 0 W z p~ 2 SSSSS W W U w � N r � J > > ° CO p OO F- p z �� U w m 2 Qrr w p w `L W LL - Z O F C)f n J p N U) m Z Y U w 2 JU w Y Q J Z Q w m m Z 2m W 11-13- Q d z of Of w = U w U U)=) a o w 40 as U)0 p af ww a p EO Q U Q O pF p LL co U1 p 1- U r U) m a J ~ crp O r� Uj w F w p o cn , a of U) z w o~ U O 0 (W7 U nno'a -- - - -� W z zF- cr 0 moa -- -- - -� � o 2 ao Z p p J pm O LLi cr p w m 0 w o a Q> LL Er W w w °p w w w °= � r ~> = z — U a w z O� � W - OZ - --- - - - - -- m � W O Z Q Q U w uWo w J : U) co af OU ir > f�UaU) w F- 0 r N M V 62' BOULEVARD, 12' DRIVE AISLE EXHIBIT 4 GH(3) W w J = W W 3 U LLI Y j� o. g LL 4 ui Y W= �aq� w❑ a � �, ZN o m N nnoa -- -- o O - 0 Q w 0 J w (� O QY 0 JUr II QQ _j w w QY 2 Q :- Of Er F fq �a tan0 W Er ad 2U W U Q U m �p ao ZO U w W D Q U w p Z o Q W f!) J af Q C) w m (J Z h co z w w 'o 0 f!) m W ti W JI- jj M M Q ifl '2 ❑ Q M Ln Q Q [] w W ❑ -mo w Q 0 co W �� w `�¢Qw❑ � CjI -mo Z z o wa Q �aW j w wa _ °a wQ vi w m W Q ¢ w 0 = za 4 J Ir J m a g F m 0 Ci Z J H O J J J O ~a' J M < W z ❑~ S W� Lu ❑ QD Z Cl �� U ❑ O W ❑ Lu W m Q Qa w WLL Z fr Z C) F I` W Y U W m (D S m U � <� Y JW Co JZ Q -1W m r- m Z MM W as Q az �0 w =U 0 d d a0 �a zo d w Q tn m ww ao (n Q U p O 7~ 7 zo z w Um 0 u� O a I` W Hw ❑ o WLn J a U)z w v r; > M Q w� F- 0 ff fA O 0 o it U nnoa -- - - -m F- > W zW m ❑p •M•Oa -- -- - - O 2 <p Z ❑ J ❑m Q ui w W O �J U o� w X FJ W a W �� F 5 W � a= m fQ a w W Y Oz J --------- m wO z q Q Q - -------- -- U wO w J Lw` co J cGH a' fr W OU > vi U a ai a W F- 0 z C'i ri v 62' BOULEVARD, 13' DRIVE AISLE EXHIBIT 5 GH(3) W J W NJ� yy V o x ------------------------ LV CL C\i J O t 'M.o.N tr) p CC) LL M.O.N J w F O LL o W u T ~ O r J W U w U w Q w co J Z W F- w fn Q QY Qw LU Jd' w () �� m w Jz i0 U co as vi0 w Q tr w uwio w z o Q U Q a s Q U w Q Q m to ap m z 0 (J) m w J _ G) Z w r, Q Z z 0 W z Q �w w ciw M O a �w p �,W O� w MQ a Z r? W C) Z a m m o Ma w(K Q LLI 0o n (A Q z of (60 n — m d w4 J UW O > �� Z w �Q = J fq Z w _ J W ' F- Za ? O a Q J O ~� c d' M w O F-- p r W WU LL Z) O p t=om p z O� 2 'r. Q U w Lo 2 4 J d Z 00 J Q Q W LL Jz u)0 w Y =U rn mz < 0 Jz_ Q az z _ icy � a aY w Q0 z xm N LL aO o a p _ u)a LL a � 0 ~ ww O U) co co jF J � F Um � a J z w z Q U) �p o .n a � �- w F_ w 2 1 o ff w Q W? w El M F- QW J M'o'N - - j w zw O w �p °p w0 }W uj o 0m w a <, U F- w U } cn m 0 FQ af 'S w d F- � ft W w jr O M F- � FJ- w ? 0 Z O LL - ------------- - - - - -- p -- w ct0 U) m Q w� a U 0 U W U)_ fn -_Jj 2F_ 0 m Q MU 0 It p Q OQ of to U a to ww U w F- O 56.5' BOULEVARD EXHIBIT 6 G H(3) I i LLI \ � � \ �\ \ \\\ ? / »)s/ I-ILI7 ) ©�� Z\ < \\ ^ \ < , 0 g -j 0< \\ 0 \ �w w � o , _� w= e /§ �§ 4 z /_0 ƒ] E co %ƒ zz w }o j§ < z w/ z MON -- -- - -- \\ 0) z <z /m ( ZW w LL � < \ $ e z \ Z }\ \§ Z m z z O \ In § I -1 7/ E/ w/ %R _ + ® §� < -J /§ §\ 10\ Q E -j ww2 \-j )§ oz \ \< =wa De m �_ w�gw \§e &m e & ro /� / �ko) \§§ j±[ 77. /\ z i/ \Z-)> jE/ \of\ \§ <Q a E {C) < <0 �< rru wmOf w0 MOB -- -- - -- _ \\$ 0< \/ ZZ zm k §ED\ C) zo %§ vi 2 {%/ Z < a up oeu j ■ 2 D� W3§ ) §f$ $ \\ jw \/§ $ƒF /} pz LL \° w w < w2 »�( 0 °E /2 zw_ ez emo moZ- </ 0 2 « & a 22S ALLEY EXHIBIT 7 GH(3) TYPICAL SINGLE LOT DETAIL GH(3) � z W J z - 'a w �Z�}'� W w o Z�Z¢aW ❑ W o a J ❑ W U F Z =Oz� ° N,o mm N�� co Z U) U o 6 LL o °y W i a L a CD Q d U31VM318VM Z j Q h N - - -- an3s a° t " � LL m o o J ai r Mm a31bM Z CL o �; �a C6 a a W Z N m m O m J LLI � J Q a � m zZ UuUi d z m d J J mV W Z m O W LPL y Lo ,oe ,o G ,oti CNlw ?Z)1139N33bJ TYPICAL SINGLE LOT DETAIL GH(3) a 6 a I I I I I I I 1 A3-IIV ,B'ZZ I I I I I� I� Iww Ica I I I I I I I I I I I EXHIBIT 8 GH(3) IT mr r i 0 N W. N � 7 v O �5 Z U O L o o P 0) 7 O ¢ N E O d tY J w � w w �QrY w� 3: 102 H d d d d d d 0 0 0 0 0 0 o��rr�rr� z a a a a a a w w 1 III rm 1 1 . I e O O I I W J Q U U TYPICAL MULTIPLE LOT DETAIL GH(3) .9 v J w CD z w w 0 k H J w m z w w CD } w J J Q } w J J Q EXHIBIT GH(3 W J W W d Wg Z' O O v J J u W H W ZOQ W U U U) C� �N�co � K O Z O E d O � t 0 N a > >oo °aNE C2 h LL G O a W Z O 0 X C, cl) zQ O J d co m Q OQ J O J c C� m X 0 Q J W m .08 LL W w W M oQ °Q J 00 Z) m 0 Q } w J J Q } w J J Q EXHIBIT GH(3 W J W W d Wg Z' O O v J J u W H W ZOQ W U U U) C� �N�co � K O Z O E d O � t 0 N a > >oo °aNE C2 h LL G O a W Z O J X C, V u Q OQ J O J c 6i m .08 LL W w W z 0 Q Oja 0 m H p 0 C7 oQQ O O J d co m } w J J Q } w J J Q EXHIBIT GH(3 W J W W d Wg Z' O O v J J u W H W ZOQ W U U U) C� �N�co � K O Z O E d O � t 0 N a > >oo °aNE C2 h LL G O a W Z O J J V u Z_ U OQ J w 6i W LL W w W 0 U N Q w X z O J W H p 0 z 0 0 z x x W a a CD W J I I FENCING DETAIL GH(3) EXHIBIT lO G H {3} LAND USE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS ZZ ri \\ \ \ \�� \ i \ { 0 k / Zvi \ E 2 e a ' I )k0 u � - s ®® \\ ) ri bo\ - � k» 2 = E d0 'k % } � � \ \ 1 - C _ . c §� }[\ O E 2 [&'i o « Z o E © s) /\ K E 2f % \ & | E ` � x 00Q CL t3 w � 7 � %\ t3 \ / w > ] } � k §( ƒ � e/ e \§ 0) \ E { \ §} )�(\ m _ - \[f# D 0 ! | *® ) 6§777 LAND USE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Agenda No. 4 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Police Department Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -11 Annual Racial Profiling Report BACKGROUND Presentation and consideration and/or action regarding the 2016 Annual Racial Profiling Report. Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 2.134 requires the chief administrator of the law enforcement agency to submit an annual report concerning data obtained on traffic stops to the governing body of the municipality served. Community Benefit Provides documentation of the activities of the City's police department in the area of traffic enforcement. Summary of Recommended Action The annual racial profiling report is submitted for review. FISCAL IMPACT No fiscal impact RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the resolution accepting the 2016 Annual Racial Profiling Report ATTACHMENT(S) 2016 Annual Racial Profiling Report Letter of explanation Resolution accepting racial profiling report RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -11 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE 2016 RACIAL PROFILING REPORT, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, Article 2.134 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, as amended, requires the chief administrator of a law enforcement agency to submit an annual report to the governing body of the municipality served that contains data obtained on traffic stops during the previous calendar year, including an analysis of both the number of motor vehicle stops and the disposition of such cases based on the race or ethnicity of the affected persons (the "2016 Racial Profiling Report"); WHEREAS, the Chief of Police of the City of Schertz (the "City ") submitted the 2016 Racial Profiling Report to the City; WHEREAS, the Chief of Police recommends that the City accept the 2016 Racial Profiling Report; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to accept the 2016 Racial Profiling Report. THAT: BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the 2016 Racial Profiling Report. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) 50506221.1 - 2 - February 28, 2017 City Council City of Schertz Re: Annual Racial Profiling Report SCHERTZ POLICE DEPARTMENT MICHAEL R. HANSEN, CHIEF OF POLICE 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BLDG 6 • SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 OFFICE: 210 - 619 -1213 • FAX: (210) 619 -1220 MHANSEN@SCHERTZ.COM In accordance with the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure Article 2.134 the attached compilation of traffic stop information is submitted. The required report must include the race or ethnicity of the individual detained, whether a search was conducted, if the individual detained consented to the search and if the officer was aware of the race or ethnicity of the individual before the stop was conducted. In addition to the statistical report, it must also provide information relating to each complaint filed with the agency alleging that an officer engaged in racial profiling. There were no complaints from traffic stops alleging that a Schertz Police Officer engaged in racial profiling during this reporting period. The law specifically states that data collected as a result of the reporting requirements shall not constitute prima facie evidence of racial profiling. In fact, I believe the data supports the recognition that the Schertz Police Department continues to ethically and impartially enforce the laws and ordinances for which we are responsible. United in a spirit of teamwork, the Schertz Police Department, as a regional leader and in partnership with the Community, is devoted to excellence in innovative and proactive public service and safety while contributing to an exceptional quality of life. Michael R. Hansen, Chief of Police Schertz, TX PD CONFIDENTIAL 1/1/2016 - 12/31/2016 Racial Profile Tier 1 HB3389 PLEASE NOTE: The official form does not allow for Other and Unknown in the Race or Ethnicity boxes on the TCOLE website. Please contact TCOLE for instructions on how to resolve these issues for 2012. This report only includes traffic stops resulting in a citation, traffic stops resulting in a citation with an arrest, traffic stops resulting in a warning with an arrest and field interviews that resulted in an arrest. Number of Motor Vehicle Stops 6431 Citations only 32 Arrest only 72 Citations and Arrests 4. 6535 Total Race or Ethnicity 840 African 132 Asian 4234 Caucasian 1301 Hispanic 18 Middle Eastern 10 Native American 0 Other 0 Unknown 11. 6535 Total Race or Ethnicity known prior to stop? 204 Yes 6331 No 14. 6535 Total Search conducted? 317 Yes 6218 No 17. 6535 Total Was search consented? 25 Yes 292 No 20. 317 Total Report Created: 2/1/2017 8:02:37 AM 1 of 1 Powered by: 4r brazes CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: City Manager's Office Agenda No. 5 Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -15 — First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract between SSLGC and SAWS BACKGROUND The SSLGC Board and the San Antonio Water Systems approved a First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract between SSLGC and SAWS. The contract also requires approval by the City of Schertz and the City of Seguin Councils. Goal The amendment will be for a three -year commitment of 500 ac -ft of surplus water. This amendment also notes operational changes that will improve reporting. Community Benefit The SSLGC and SAWS contract provided significant financial benefits to the corporation and to both owner cities. This amendment further adds benefit for commitment of excess water. Summary of Recommended Action Staff recommends Council approve the First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract. This amendment is effective January 1, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT 3 year guarantee of 500 ac -ft a year of surplus water. The sale of surplus water impacts rates in a positive manner. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve Resolution ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 17 -R -15 First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract (SSLGC Board Approved 01/19/2017) RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -15 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A FIRST AMENDMENT TO MUTUAL REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT BETWEEN SCHERTZ /SEGUIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATION AND SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation, the City of Schertz, the City of Seguin, and San Antonio Water System (collectively the Parties ") entered into a certain Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract (the "Water Supply Contract ") effective on January 1, 2011, for delivery and treatment of water; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to amend the Water Supply Contract to change certain requirements for administration, water delivery and water purchase; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Amendment with Schertz /Seguin Local Government Corporation and San Antonio Waters System in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 5023481 1.1 EXHIBIT A FIRST AMENDMENT TO MUTUAL REGIONAL WATER SUPPLY CONTRACT 50234811.1 A -1 First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract This First Amendment to Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract ( "First Amendment') is entered into by and among the Schertz /Seguin Local Government Corporation (the "Corporation "), a non - profit corporation of the State of Texas (the "State "), created and existing under the laws of the State, including the Texas Transportation Corporation Act, as amended, Texas transportation Code Section 431.001 et. Seq., the City of Schertz, Texas, a home -rule city ( "Schertz "); the City of Seguin, Texas, a home -rule city ( "Seguin "); and the City of San Antonio, Texas, a home -rule city, acting by and through its San Antonio Water System ( "SAWS "). Recitals Whereas, the Corporation, Schertz, Seguin, and SAWS (collectively the Parties ") entered into that certain Mutual Regional Water Supply Contract (the "Water Supply Contract') effective on January 1, 2011, for delivery and treatment of water; and Whereas, the Parties desire to amend the Water Supply Contract to change certain requirements for administration, water delivery and water purchase; Now therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, and upon and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Parties mutually undertake, promise and agree as follows: 1. Section 1.01.13. Notice is deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: Section 1.01.13. Surplus Water Commitment. Subject to Section 1. 11.13 and further subject to a delivery schedule mutually determined by the Parties on an annual basis, SAWS shall be obligated to accept into the SAWS Water System and pay the Corporation for Surplus Water in the following amounts in calendar years 2018 through 2020 (the "Minimum Surplus Water Amounts "): a. 500 acre -feet in calendar year 2018; b. 500 acre -feet in calendar year 2019; and c. 500 acre -feet in calendar year 2020. After December 31, 2020, SAWS shall not be obligated to accept any amount of Surplus Water into the SAWS Water System and shall not be obligated to pay the Corporation for any Surplus Water not accepted by SAWS. SAWS shall pay the Corporation on a monthly basis at the rate set forth in Section 2.03.13 for (a) Minimum Surplus Water Amounts which have been actually delivered by the Corporation in compliance with this Contract, (b) any additional amount of Surplus Water for which timely notice of acceptance has been given by SAWS and which has been actually delivered by the Corporation, and (c) such incidental additional amounts of water not to exceed twenty -five acre -feet per calendar year delivery of which is attributable to accounting and operational procedures. The Corporation shall use data obtained from the SAWS Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System (`SCADA ") at 11:59 p.m. on the final day of each month as the official monthly measurement of the water volume delivered to SAWS. The Corporation may make available to any person the amount of Surplus Water in excess of the volume of Surplus Water that SAWS agreed to accept. 2. Section 1.O 1.E. Surplus Water Commitment is deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: Section 1.O1.E. Surplus Water Notice.. The Corporation hereby notifies SAWS that the Minimum Surplus Water Amounts will be available from the Corporation in calendar years 2018 through 2020. The Corporation may notify SAWS in writing at any time if an additional amount of Surplus Water ( "Additional Surplus Water Amount ") in excess of the Minimum Surplus Water Amount for the following calendar year becomes available for SAWS. Within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of the written notice, SAWS shall notify the Corporation in writing of the Additional Surplus Water Amount SAWS agrees to accept. 3. The second sentence of Section 2.02.D. SAWS Water is amended to read as follows: SAWS shall notify the Corporation in writing on or before April 1 of each year during the term of this Contract of the amount of groundwater SAWS and its sources will be authorized by the GCUWCD to pump in the following calendar year (the "Annual Authorized Pumping Amount "). 4. Section 2.03.G. Annual Projected Volume is deleted and replaced in its entirety by the following: Section 2.03.G. Annual Preliminary and Final Notice of Rates. 1. Each year on or before May 1 beginning in 2017, the Corporation shall provide preliminary written notice to SAWS of the anticipated rate to be paid by SAWS for (a) treatment and transportation of SAWS water, and (b) Surplus Water; subject only to unforeseen adjustments necessitated by the Corporation's final budget development before July 1. 2. Each year on or before July 1 beginning in 2017, the Corporation shall provide written notice to SAWS of the rate to be paid by SAWS for (a) treatment and transportation of SAWS water, and (b) Surplus Water; all in accordance with this Section 2.03, for the following calendar year. 3. Both the preliminary written notice and the final written notice shall include supporting information and documentation sufficient to enable SAWS to evaluate the basis for any adjustments to the current rates. 4. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt by SAWS of each notice, SAWS will notify the Corporation in writing of any objections to the adjustments. Within fourteen (14) calendar days of receipt by the Corporation of the written objections, the parties shall meet and attempt to resolve any objections by 2 SAWS. This subsection G relates only to the determination of Operation and Maintenance Charges and does not relate in any way to the debt service on the Contract Revenue Bonds. 5. The terms of this First Amendment shall be construed as part of the terms of the Water Supply Contract in all respects. In the event the terms, covenants or conditions of this First Amendment conflict with the terms, covenants or conditions of the Water Supply Contract, the terms of this First Amendment shall control. All other terms and conditions of the Water Supply Contract remain in full force and effect. Capitalized terms used but not otherwise defined herein shall have the respective meanings ascribed to such terms in the Water Supply Contract. 6. This First Amendment may be executed in counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which together shall constitute but one and the same instrument. 7. The effective date of this First Amendment is January 1, 2017. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties acting under authority of their respective governing bodies have caused this First Amendment to be duly executed as of the Effective Date. 3 Attest Secretary, Board of Directors Attest: Attest: City Secretary Attest: City Secretary 4 SCHERTZ /SEGUIN LOCAL GOVERNMENT CORPORATION k , By: V VV President, Board of Directors SAN ANTONIO WATER SYSTEM Im Robert R. Puente President /Chief Executive officer CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS City Manager CITY OF SEGUIN, TEXAS City Manager Agenda No. 6 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Engineering Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -16- A Resolution by the City of Schertz authorizing contracts with Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc., totaling no more than $195,000 for the design of improvements to Main Street during the 2016 -2017 Fiscal Year BACKGROUND Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc., was awarded a three -year agreement for On -Call Engineering Services via Resolution 14 -R -57. The City's practice is to seek authorization from Council when expenditures with a vendor exceed $50,000 in one fiscal year. The City is proposing to begin the Main Street bond project and is proposing to contract with Pape Dawson Engineer, Inc. for this project. In 2010 voters approved a series of bond propositions, one of which, Proposition 4 allocated $1,000,000.00 for "the purpose of making permanent public improvements, or for other public purposes, to wit; designing, constructing, reconfiguring, demolishing, renovating and equipping revitalization and beautification improvements to downtown City of Schertz in the area of FM 78 and Main Street (with priority given to constructing features welcoming persons to the City, including but not limited to decorative pavings, crosswalks, curbing and decorative poles, utilities relocation, lighting, bollards, bike racks, trash receptacles, benches, sidewalk and trail improvements, fences, and landscaping) and acquiring any necessary real property therefor... ". This is the last of the 2010 bond projects. City Staff had been hoping to add funds to this project from remaining street bond funds, but those are needed for the improvements to Schertz Parkway. The City's adopted "Sector Plan" which is part of the City's Comprehensive Plan, outlines the vision for the Main Street area in Part 4 Historic Downtown Schertz : / /216.45.71.196 /Weblink/ 1 /edoc /210903 /Ordinance %2013 -S- 21 %20Comnrehensive %20PIan %20( Schertz% 20Sector %20PIan)%20- %207.16.2013.bdf. This vision will serves as the basis for the use of the Main Street Bond program. The Main Street Bond improvements are one of several efforts underway by the City to bring about the revitalization of this area. Others include the fee waiver program, the Main Street Grant, UDC changes including the Main Street Mixed Use District, and efforts by the Schertz Historic Preservation Committee (SHPC). Key challenges involved with this project that expand the scope impacting the preliminary stage and significantly the design phase have to do with the age of the infrastructure and a likely lack of accurate records which creates more unknown conditions than other projects. The other challenge common to developed commercial areas involves keeping adjacent local businesses "open for business" during the project and developing an accurate schedule that takes into consideration their needs. Staff plans to work closely with the SHPC and local property owners to keep them informed and solicit their input while moving at a fast pace. GOAL To obtain authorization from City Council to contract with Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. to provide professional engineering, and/or surveying services in an amount not to exceed $195,000 during the 2016 -2017 Fiscal Year. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that Council authorize the use of Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. for engineering and surveying services as needed for the 2016 -2017 Fiscal Year in an amount not to exceed $195,000. FISCAL IMPACT Funds are budgeted and available for the not -to- exceed amount of $195,000 for the known proposed projects as part of the 2010 bond funds. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -R -16 Main Street Improvement Project Agreement with Pape Dawson Engineering, Inc. RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -16 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING CONTRACTS WITH PAPE DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC., TOTALING NO MORE THAN $195,000, FOR THE DESIGN OF THE MAIN STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT DURING THE 2016 -2017 FISCAL YEAR AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City of Schertz (the "City ") requires professional engineering and surveying services for the completion of the Main Street Improvement Project; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc., is qualified to provide such services for the City; and WHEREAS, Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. is an approved On -Call Engineering Firm for the City of Schertz; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes City Staff to use Pape Dawson Engineer, Inc. for the design of the Main Street Improvement Project in an amount not to exceed $195,000 for the 2016 -2017 Fiscal Year. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreements with Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A. Engineering services will be provided and total expenditures shall not exceed $195,000 for the 2016 -2017 Fiscal Year. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017 ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor -2- CITY OF SCHERTZ PROJECT AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES This Agreement is entered into in the City of Schertz, Texas, between the City of Schertz, a Texas municipal corporation, hereinafter called "CITY" and/or "OWNER ", and Pape Dawson Engineers, Inc. hereinafter called "CONSULTANT ". Engineer(s), duly licensed, and practicing under the laws of the State of Texas, hereinafter called "CONSULTANT ", this Agreement being executed by City pursuant to appropriate action by the City Council of CITY and by CONSULTANT, for engineering services hereinafter set forth in connection with the above designated Project for CITY. ARTICLE 1 DEFINITIONS ARTICLE 2 SCOPE OF SERVICES ARTICLE 3 COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES ARTICLE 4 METHOD OF PAYMENT ARTICLE 5 TIME, SCHEDULE, AND PERIOD OF SERVICE ARTICLE 6 COORDINATION WITH CITY ARTICLE 7 REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARTICLE 8 OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS ARTICLE 9 TERMINATION AND /OR SUPENSION OF WORK ARTICLE 10 CONSULTANT'S WARRANTY ARTICLE 11 ASSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF INTEREST ARTICLE 12 INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS ARTICLE 13 INDEMNIFICATION ARTICLE 14 CLAIMS AND DISPUTES ARTICLE 15 SEVERABILITY ARTICLE 16 ESTIMATES OF COST ARTICLE 17 INTEREST IN CITY CONTRACTS PROHIBITED ARTICLE 18 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE ARTICLE 19 STANDARD OF CARE ARTICLE 20 RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT ARTICLE 21 ENTIRE AGREEMENTS ARTICLE 22 VENUE ARTICLE 23 NOTICES ARTICLE 24 INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR ARTICLE 25 CAPTIONS ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT SCOPE OF SERVICES ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT COST ATTACHMENT 3 ADDITIONAL PROJECTS AND /OR EXPANDED SCOPE OF SERVICES BILLING RATE SCHEDULE Main Street Improvements Page 1 ARTICLE 1: DEFINITIONS AS USED IN THIS AGREEMENT, THE FOLLOWING TERMS SHALL HAVE MEANINGS AS SET OUT BELOW: Agreement means this Master Agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT that establishes the terms and conditions for all Projects to be carried out under this Agreement. Application for Compensation means the form CONSULTANT uses to make a request to be paid for completed services. Application for Payment means the form CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR uses to make a request to be paid for completed work. Certificate for Payment means the form CONSULTANT uses to make recommendations on CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S Application for Payment. CITY means the City of Schertz, Texas. Claim means a demand or assertion by one of the parties seeking, as a matter of right, adjustment, or interpretation of the terms of this Agreement, payment of money, extension of time, or other relief with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The term "claim" also includes other disputes and matters in question between the OWNER and CONSULTANT arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Compensation means amounts paid by CITY to CONSULTANT for completed services under this Agreement. CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR means the firm hired by CITY to construct the Project. Construction Contract Documents means the contract between the CITY and the firm contracted by CITY to construct the Project and all documents therein. CONSULTANT means the entity named on the cover page of this Agreement and its officers, partners, employees, agents, and representatives, and all its subconsultants, if any, and all other persons or entities for which CONSULTANT is legally responsible. ENGINEER means CITY's City Engineer. Final Compensation means the final amounts paid by CITY to CONSULTANT for completed services under this Agreement. Final Payment means the final amounts paid by CITY to CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR for completed work under the construction contract. Main Street Improvements Page 2 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost means CONSULTANT'S estimate of probable construction cost for a Project based on its experience and qualifications as a practitioner of its profession and the current costs in the local area. OWNER means the City of Schertz, Texas. Payment means amount paid by CITY to CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR for work performed under the Construction Contract Documents. Plans and Specifications means the construction documents. Project means the capital improvement /construction development undertaking of CITY for which CONSULTANT'S services, as stated in the Scope of Services, and to be provided pursuant to this Agreement. Proposal means CONSULTANT'S proposal to provide services for the Project. Schedule of Values means the fees allocated to services, reimbursable and/or various portions of the services or Work, prepared in such form, and supported by such data to substantiate its accuracy as OWNER may require. Scope of Services means the services described in Article 4, Scope of Services. Services means professional services performed by CONSULTANT. Total Compensation means the amount paid to CONSULTANT under Article 2, Compensation for Basic Services, of this Agreement. Work means the labor and materials required to complete a Project by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. ARTICLE 2: SCOPE OF SERVICES 2.1 CONSULTANT shall not commence work until being thoroughly briefed on the scope of the Project and being notified in writing to proceed. The scope of the Project and CONSULTANT'S Services required shall be reduced by CONSULTANT to a written summary of the scope meeting. That Scope of Services and associated cost, once approved by CITY, will be included as a part of this Agreement as Attachments I and 2 herein. Should the scope subsequently change, either CONSULTANT or CITY may request a review of the anticipated services, with an appropriate adjustment in compensation. 2.2 Communications by and with CONSULTANT'S subconsultants shall be through CONSULTANT. Communications by and with subcontractors and material suppliers shall be through CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. Main Street Improvements Page 3 2.3 CONSULTANT, in consideration for the Compensation herein provided, shall render the professional Services described in this Section that are necessary for the development of the Project, including plans and specifications, construction management services, any special and general conditions, and instructions to bidders as acceptable to the Engineer, or his or her duly authorized representative. 2.4 CONSULTANT shall complete a Project in accordance with the following phases and CONSULTANT'S Scope of Services attached and incorporated herein as Attachments 1 and 2. 2.4.1 PROJECT DESIGN PHASES 2.4.2 Preliminary Phase 2.4.3 100% Design 2.4.4 Bid Documents and Services 2.4.5 Construction Phase Services 2.4.6 Project Close Out and Final Payment 2.5 Upon acceptance and approval of the plans, reports or other deliverables required for a Phase of work, as set forth in the Scope of Services, Engineer shall authorize CONSULTANT, in writing, to proceed with the next phase of Work. 2.6 During the Preliminary Phase CONSULTANT shall: 2.6.1 Coordinate and meet with City staff to discuss the project Options to explore and analyze. A minimum of 1 meeting expected to meet this task. 2.6.2 Using the Schertz Plan as a basis, develop Options (like a menu) with Opinion of Probable Costs (OPCC) associated with each Option. These options include a maximum of 3 alternatives for the "Gateway" monuments. A Technical Memo presenting all Options, Findings and Costs will be submitted to the City for their review and approval. 2.6.3 Consultant to assist the City in two Public Meetings. The first meeting will consist of Options being explored and acquire public input to integrate into the final project. The second Public Meeting will consist of presenting findings and best Options chosen for design implementation. 2.7 During Design Phases CONSULTANT shall: 2.7.1 Conduct three progress meeting with the City of Schertz. The Consultant is to present the Alternative findings from the previous phase and the steps moving forward into the Design Phase. The second and third meetings will take place as progress meeting within the Design Phase, at least one progress /findings and OPCC presentation to be made to the City Council. 2.7.2 Keep Field Survey to a minimum. Unless areas within the limits of the project need detailed survey, Consultant will utilize LIDAR and Aerial information to Main Street Improvements Page 4 develop the entire design for the project. In areas within the project limits, where this information is not sufficient, Consultant will send out a Survey crew to tie - down specific, localized items. Potential items to be surveyed within the project area, where Lidar and Aerial don't suffice (not limited to) are overhead electrical poles, water valves, fire hydrants, inlets, MH covers, natural ground topography, building perimeters, roadway signage, signal mast arms, driveways, curb returns, medians, walls, steps, curb ramps, trees, etc. 2.7.3 Obtain Geotech soil borings to determine the types of existing soil within the project limits for any proposed "Gateway" monument or other art piece foundations. 2.7.4 Develop /update and Provide Landscape and Architectural renderings within the extents of the project to help guide the overall design concept. This includes the final alternative chosen for the "Gateway" monument. 2.7.5 Other agency coordination tasks. Coordinate and submit plans to TxDOT for their approval of the intersection work to be done for the 2 intersections on FM 78, Lindbergh Avenue and 1st Street. Coordinate and submit plans to the TDLR for all ADA compliance on all proposed curb ramps within the project limits. Coordination with UPRR. This task involves, but not limited to, preparing submittal packages and addressing comments. 2.7.6 Utility coordination — low level utility coordination, coordination will take place Schertz Water and Sewer, Guadalupe Valley Electric Co -op (GVEC), Spectrum, etc. This coordination is mainly to inform all utilities of the project and potential conflicts and adjustments. 2.7.7 All design items will be in compliance with City of Schertz Unified Development Code. Provide detailed Construction Documents (11x17 Sheets) and specifications for the Project at appropriate progress intervals in requested formats (may include hard copy, .pdf, and .dwg). At Minimum, the Construction Documents should contain the following subsets: • Dimensional Control • General Notes • Typical Sections • Quantities • Roadway Plan • Architectural Site Plans • Landscape Plan • Details 2.7.8 Provide Opinion of Probably Construction Cost. 2.7.9 Internal QA/QC of the entire Plan Set and OPCC 2.7.10 List of exclusions from the Preliminary /Design Phase Scope: Main Street Improvements Page 5 • Drainage — this scope does not include any hydrological and/or hydraulic analysis. Storm Sewer /Culvert design. • Permits — there are no foreseen Environmental Permits involved with this project therefore this project does involve any type of Environmental, USACE, Floodplain, ESAs, etc. • Existing Pavement testing (Core) — at the client's request, the pavement work will remain at most as Mill and Overlay, the scope does not consist of any non- destructive /core or asphalt pavement subsurface testing. • ROW surveys (metes and bounds), project purpose and intent does not include any type of ROW acquisition, condemnation and/or acquiring easements. • Utility adjustments. This scope limits any utility task to only coordination. Provide Opinion of Probably Construction Cost. 2.8 During Bid Phase CONSULTANT shall: 2.8.1 Provide unit price bid quantities in City bid form format for use in bid documents. 2.8.2 Provide bid sets of contract, technical specifications, plans, and any other necessary documents in hard copy and digital format. 2.8.3 Attend pre -bid conference and prepare responses to questions and addenda as necessary. 2.8.4 Research qualifications and references of apparent low bidder(s) and provide a letter of recommendation for contract award. 2.9 During Construction Phase: 2.9.1 CONSULTANT will make a minimum of one visit per week to the Project Site. Intent of the visits are: • Familiarity with the construction process • Keep City informed of the progress, the Consultant is excluded from making exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. 2.9.2 Respond to all RFIs and review all Shop Drawings. 2.9.3 Develop Punch List to include City of Schertz for comments. Provide list to contractor and City staff. Review Site for Punch List Completion 2.9.4 Develop as -built drawings with assistance from the Contractor. Provide drawings to the City. Main Street Improvements Page 6 2.9.5 CONSULTANT will make a minimum of two visits per month to the Project Site at intervals appropriate to the Phases to (1) become generally familiar with and to keep CITY informed about the progress and quality of the portion of the Work completed, and (2) endeavor to guard CITY against defects in Work. However, CONSULTANT will not be required to make exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work. 2.9.6 CONSULTANT will neither have control over or charge of, nor be responsible for, the construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, or for the safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work since these are solely CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S rights and responsibilities under the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT'S efforts will be directed toward providing for CITY a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work will generally conform to the Contract Documents. 2.9.7 CONSULTANT will not be responsible for CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S failure to perform the Work in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT will not have control over or charge of and will not be responsible for acts or omissions of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, subcontractors, or their agents or employees, or any other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. 2.9.8 CONSULTANT and CITY have authority to reject Work that does not conform to the Contract Documents. Whenever CONSULTANT or CITY considers it necessary or advisable, either CITY or CONSULTANT may require inspection or testing of the Work whether or not such Work is fabricated, installed or completed. However, neither this authority of CONSULTANT or CITY, nor a decision made by either, in good faith, to require or not require an inspection shall give rise to a duty or responsibility of CONSULTANT or CITY to CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, agents or employees, or other persons or entities performing portions of the Work. 2.9.9 CONSULTANT will review and approve or take other appropriate action upon CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data and Samples, but only for the limited purpose of checking for conformance with information given and the design concept expressed in the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT will respond to submittals such as Shop Drawings, Product Data, and Samples pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Project specifications. Review of such submittals is not conducted for the purpose of determining the accuracy and completeness of equipment or systems, all of which remain the responsibility of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR as required by the Contract Documents. CONSULTANT'S review of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S submittals shall not relieve CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR of its obligations. CONSULTANT'S review shall not constitute approval of safety precautions or any construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures unless otherwise specifically stated Main Street Improvements Page 7 by CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT'S approval of a specific item shall not indicate approval of an assembly of which the item is a component. 2.9.10 CONSULTANT will, within three work days after receipt of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S Application for Payment review the Application for Payment and either issue to OWNER and/or the affected utility a Certificate for Payment for such amount as CONSULTANT determines is properly due, or notify OWNER, any affected utility, and CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR in writing of CONSULTANT'S reasons for withholding recommendation of approval in whole or in part. 2.9.11 CONSULTANT'S issuance of a Certificate for Payment will constitute a representation by CONSULTANT to OWNER, based on CONSULTANT'S evaluation of the Work and the data comprising the Application for Payment, that the Work has progressed to the point indicated and that, to the best of CONSULTANT'S knowledge, information and belief, the quality of the work is in accordance with the design agreement documents or Construction Contract Documents. The foregoing representations are subject to an evaluation of the Work for conformance with the design agreement documents, to results of subsequent tests and inspections, to correction of minor deviations from the design agreement documents prior to completion, and to any specific qualifications expressed by CONSULTANT. The issuance of a Certificate for Payment based on the CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S Application for Payment will further constitute a representation that CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR is entitled to payment in accordance with the Schedule of Values. The issuance of Certificate for Payment will not be a representation that CONSULTANT has (1) made exhaustive or continuous on -site inspections to check the quality or quantity of the Work, (2) reviewed construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures, (3) reviewed copies of requisitions received from Subcontractors and material suppliers and other data requested by OWNER to substantiate Construction Contractor's right to payment, or (4) made any examination to ascertain how or for what purpose CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR has used money previously paid on account of the Application for Payment sum. 2.9.12 CONSULTANT may recommend withholding an approval for Payment in whole or in part, to the extent reasonably necessary to protect OWNER if, in CONSULTANT'S opinion, the representations to OWNER required by Section 4.13 cannot be made. If CONSULTANT is unable to recommend approval of payment in the amount of the Application, CONSULTANT will notify OWNER and CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR as provided in Section 4.12. If OWNER and CONSULTANT cannot agree on a revised amount, CONSULTANT will promptly issue a Certificate for Payment for the amount for which CONSULTANT is able to make such representations to OWNER. CONSULTANT may also recommend withholding a Payment, because of subsequently discovered evidence, may modify the whole or a part of a Certificate for Payment to such extent as may be necessary, in CONSULTANT'S opinion, to Main Street Improvements Page 8 protect OWNER and the affected utility from loss for which CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR is responsible, including loss resulting from acts and omissions described below: 2.9.12.1 defective Work not remedied; 2.9.12.2 third party claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of such claims for which CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR is responsible hereunder unless security acceptable to OWNER and the affected utility is provided by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR; 2.9.12.3 failure of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR to make payments properly to the subcontractors and/or material providers; 2.9.12.4 reasonable evidence that the Work cannot be completed for the unpaid balance of the agreement sum and CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR has failed to provide OWNER and the affected utility adequate assurance of its continued performance within a reasonable time after demand; 2.9.12.5 damage to OWNER or another contractor; 2.9.12.6 reasonable evidence that the Work will not be completed within the agreement time, and that the unpaid balance would not be adequate to cover actual or liquidated damages for the anticipated delay; or 2.9.12.7 persistent failure by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR to carry out the Work in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. 2.9.13 When the above reasons for withholding payment are removed, payment will be made for amounts previously withheld. OWNER shall not be deemed in default by CONSULTANT by reason of withholding payment as provided herein. 2.9.14 CONSULTANT will prepare Change Orders and Field Work Directives, and, with concurrence of OWNER, OWNER'S designated representative will have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment in the Total Compensation or an extension of the time for construction. Such changes shall be effected by written order, which CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR shall carry out promptly and record on the as -built plan. 2.9.15 Upon written request of CITY or CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, CONSULTANT will issue its interpretation of the requirements of the Plans and Specifications. CONSULTANT'S response to such requests will be made in writing within any agreed time limits or otherwise with reasonable promptness. If no agreement is made concerning the time within which interpretations required by CONSULTANT shall be furnished in compliance with Article IV, then delay shall not be recognized on account of failure by CONSULTANT to furnish such Main Street Improvements Page 9 interpretations until 15 days after written request is made for CONSULTANT'S interpretation. 2.9.16 Interpretations of CONSULTANT will be consistent with the intent of and reasonably inferable from the Construction Contract Documents and will be in writing or in the form of drawings. 2.9.17 CONSULTANT will advise and consult with CITY. CITY'S instructions to CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR may be issued through CONSULTANT, but CITY reserves the right to issue instructions directly to CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR through inspectors or other designated CITY representatives. 2.9.18 CONSULTANT and CITY will conduct observations to determine the date of substantial completion of the Work. CONSULTANT shall provide to CITY a written recommendation of consideration of substantial completion of the Project. 2.9.19 CONSULTANT and CITY will conduct observations to determine the date of final completion. CONSULTANT will receive and forward to CITY, for CITY'S review and records, written warranties and related documents required by the Construction Contract Documents and assembled by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, and will issue a final Approval for Payment upon compliance with the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents. Such final Approval will be accompanied by a signed and sealed statement from the CONSULTANT'S Engineer of Record that certifies to CITY that the project was constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. 2.9.20 CONSULTANT shall prepare record drawings from information submitted by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR and from CONSULTANT'S own observations in accordance with City standards. CONSULTANT shall provide record drawings in hard copy, .pdf, and .dwg formats to CITY. ARTICLE 3: COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES 3.1 Basic Services 3.1.1 Compensation for all Services included in this Agreement will be on a time and expense not -to- exceed basis in accordance with the negotiated, approved schedule of billing rates as set forth in Attachment 2. Not -to- exceed compensation amounts, to the extent they have been negotiated shall be reflected in Attachment 2. A Proposal including a not -to- exceed cost will be provided by CONSULTANT along with a Scope of Services for each Project (Attachments 1 and 2). The amount to be paid to CONSULTANT, including authorized adjustments, is the total amount payable by OWNER to CONSULTANT for performance of the Services for the Project under this Agreement. It is agreed and understood that such amount will constitute full compensation to CONSULTANT for Services included in the Scope of Services and shall meet all requirements of CITY'S design guidelines applicable to the Project. Unless and until CITY makes further appropriations for any Services not included in the Main Street Improvements Page 10 Scope of Services of this Agreement, the obligation of CITY to CONSULTANT for Compensation in connection with this Agreement cannot and will not exceed the sum described in this Section without further amendment to this Agreement. 3.1.2 No billing rate changes from those approved as Attachment 2 of this Agreement shall be made during the term of this Agreement without the prior written approval of CITY. 3.1.3 CONSULTANT shall submit monthly invoices to CITY describing the Services performed the preceding month. CONSULTANT'S invoices shall include the name of the person who performed the Service, a brief description of the Service performed and the Phase of the Project to which the Service relates, the date(s) the Service was performed, the number of hours spent on all Services billed on an hourly basis, and a description of any subconsultant fees and/or reimbursable expenditures. 3.1.4 CITY shall reimburse CONSULTANT only for those costs or expenses specifically approved in this Agreement, or specifically approved in advance by CITY. Unless otherwise approved, such costs shall be limited and include nothing more than the following costs incurred by CONSULTANT: 3.1.4.1 Approved reproduction charges, 3.1.4.2 Actual costs of subconsultant(s) for performance of any of the Services that CONSULTANT agrees to provide pursuant to this Agreement, which have been approved in advance by CITY and awarded in accordance with this Agreement. 3.1.4.3 Actual costs and/or other costs and/or payments specifically authorized in advance by the CITY in writing and incurred by CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement. 3.1.5 CONSULTANT shall complete the Project in accordance with the following phases. For the purpose of establishing portions of compensation for separate phases, more particularly described in the Scope of Services, Attachment 2 shall apply. Preliminary Phase 100% Design Bid Documents and Services Construction Phase Services Project Close Out and Final Payment 3.1.6 CONSULTANT shall, within 10 days following receipt of Compensation from OWNER, pay all bills for Services performed and furnished hereunder by subconsultant(s) of CONSULTANT in connection with the Project and the performance of services and shall, if requested, provide OWNER with evidence of such payment. CONSULTANT'S failure to make payments within such time Main Street Improvements Page 11 shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement unless CONSULTANT is able to demonstrate to OWNER bona fide disputes associated with the Services of the unpaid subconsultant and its services. CONSULTANT shall include a provision in each of its sub agreements imposing the same payment obligations on its subconsultants as are applicable to CONSULTANT hereunder, and if OWNER so requests, shall provide evidence of such payments by CONSULTANT to OWNER. If CONSULTANT has failed to make payment promptly to the subconsultant for undisputed Services for which OWNER has made payment to CONSULTANT, OWNER shall be entitled to withhold future payment to CONSULTANT to the extent remaining unpaid by CONSULTANT necessary to protect OWNER. 3.1.7 CONSULTANT warrants that title to all deliverables produced in the performance of Services covered by an Application for Compensation will pass to OWNER no later than the time of payment. CONSULTANT further warrants that upon submittal of an Application for Compensation, all Services for which Applications for Compensation have been previously issued and payments received from OWNER shall, to the best of CONSULTANT'S knowledge, information and belief be free and clear of liens, claims, security interests or encumbrance in favor of CONSULTANT, or other persons or entities under contract with CONSULTANT making a claim by reason of having provided labor or services relating to CONSULTANT'S Services. CONSULTANT SHALL INDEMNIFY AND HOLD OWNER HARMLESS FROM ANY LIENS, CLAIMS, SECURITY INTEREST OR ENCUMBRANCES FILED BY ANYONE CLAIMING BY, THROUGH OR UNDER THE ITEMS COVERED BY PAYMENTS MADE BY OWNER TO CONSULTANT. 3.2 Additional Services 3.2.1 CONSULTANT shall not receive any compensation for additional Services without prior written authorization of CITY. Compensation for duly authorized additional Services shall be paid in accordance with the approved schedule of billing rates as set forth in Attachment 2. 3.2.2 Examples of additional Services (not all inclusive) 3.2.2.1 Assistance to CITY as an expert witness in any litigation with third parties arising from the development of construction of a Project including the preparation of engineering data and reports. 3.2.2.2 Preparation of plats and field notes for acquisition of property. 3.2.2.3 Preparation of applications and supporting documents for governmental grants, loans, or advances in connection with a Project; preparation of review of environmental assessment and impact statements; review and evaluation of the effect on the design requirements of a Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and assistance in Main Street Improvements Page 12 obtaining approval of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of a Project. 3.2.2.4 Making revisions in drawings, specifications, or other documents when such revisions are inconsistent with written approvals or instructions previously given, are required by the enactment or revision of codes, laws, or regulations subsequent to the preparation of such documents or are due to other causes not solely within the control of CONSULTANT. 3.2.2.5 Making revisions to drawings or specifications occasioned by acceptance of substitutions proposed by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR; and Services after the award of each contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of an unreasonable or excessive number of substitutions proposed by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. 3.2.2.6 Preparing drawings, specifications, and supporting data and providing other Services in connection with change order requests to the extent that the adjustment in the basic compensation resulting from the adjusted construction cost is not commensurate with the Services required of CONSULTANT, provided such change order requests are required by causes not solely within the control of CONSULTANT; or in connection with change orders requiring significant engineering effort to compute and document the Work effort reflected by the Change Order. 3.2.2.7 Investigations, surveys, valuations, inventories, or detailed appraisals of facilities, construction and/or services not required by Project scope. 3.2.2.8 Investigations, surveys, audit, or inventories required in connection with construction performed by CITY. 3.2.2.9 Additional Services during construction made necessary by: 3.2.2.9.1 Work damaged by fire or other cause during construction. 3.2.2.9.2 A significant amount of defective or neglected work of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. 3.2.2.9.3 Failure of performance of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. 3.2.2.9.4 Acceleration of the progress schedule required by CITY involving Services beyond normal working hours. 3.2.2.9.5 Default by CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. Main Street Improvements Page 13 3.2.2.10 Providing extensive assistance in the use of any equipment or system such as initial start-up or testing, adjusting and balancing, preparation of operation and maintenance manuals, training personnel for operation and maintenance, and consultation during operation. 3.2.2.11 Providing Services relative to future facilities, systems, and equipment which are not intended to be constructed during the Construction Phase. 3.2.2.12 Services after completion of the Construction Phase, such as inspections during any guarantee period and reporting observed deficiencies under guarantee called for in any contract for a Project. 3.2.2.13 Providing Services of geotechnical engineering firm to perform test borings and other soil or foundation investigations and related analysis not included in original Scope of Services for a Project. 3.2.2.14 Additional copies of Construction Contract Documents, review documents, bidding documents, reports, and or drawings over the number specified in the original Scope of Services for a Project. 3.2.2.15 Preparation of all documents dealing with 404 permits and railroad agreements. 3.2.2.16 Providing photographs, renderings, or models for CITY use. 3.2.2.17 Providing aerial mapping Services. 3.2.2.18 Providing consulting engineering Services not related to a particular design or construction Project. 3.3 All Applications for Compensation shall be submitted through Engineer's office. ARTICLE 4: METHOD OF PAYMENT 4.1 Compensation may be made to CONSULTANT as appropriately indicated on monthly Applications for Compensation prepared based on hourly rates, not to exceed amounts estimated for each phase, as described in Article 2 and Attachments 1 and 2 hereof. 4.2 Project Close Out and Final Payment — 4.2.1 CONSULTANT shall not be entitled to final payment unless and until it submits to OWNER its affidavit that the invoices for services, and other liabilities connected with the services for which OWNER, or OWNER'S property, might be responsible have been fully paid or otherwise satisfied or will be paid from final payment; releases and waivers of liens from all CONSULTANT'S subconsultants and of any and all other parties required by OWNER that are either unconditional or conditional on receipt of final payment; certificates of insurance showing Main Street Improvements Page 14 continuation of required insurance coverage; such other documents as OWNER may request; and consent of surety to final payment. 4.2.2 Final Compensation — The final compensation to be made by CITY to CONSULTANT will be payable upon submission of the "Record Drawings ". CONSULTANT agrees to submit "Record Drawings: in print media, electronic format (.pdf and .dwg formats) and final billing within 45 days of final acceptance of construction. Additionally, CONSULTANT agrees to submit a statement of release with the final billing notifying CITY that there is no further compensation owed to CONSULTANT by CITY beyond the final bill. Final billing shall indicate "Final Bill — no additional compensation is due to CONSULTANT ". 4.3 OWNER may withhold compensation to such extent as may be necessary, in OWNER'S opinion, to protect OWNER from damage or loss for which CONSULTANT is responsible, because of, 4.3.1 delays in the performance of CONSULTANT'S services; 4.3.2 third party claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of such claims unless security acceptable to OWNER is provided by CONSULTANT; 4.3.3 failure of CONSULTANT to make payments properly to subconsultants or vendors for labor, materials or equipment; 4.3.4 reasonable evidence that CONSULTANT'S work cannot be completed for the amount unpaid under this Agreement; 4.3.5 damage to OWNER or CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR; or 4.3.6 persistent failure by CONSULTANT to carry out the performance of its Services in accordance with this Agreement. 4.4 When the above reasons for withholding are removed or remedied by CONSULTANT, compensation of the amount withheld will be made within a reasonable time. OWNER shall not be deemed in default by reason of withholding compensation as provided for in this Article. 4.5 In the event of any dispute(s) between the parties regarding the amount properly payable for any Phase or as final Compensation, or regarding any amount that may be withheld by OWNER, CONSULTANT shall be required to make a claim pursuant to and in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and follow the procedures provided herein for the resolution of such dispute. In the event CONSULTANT does not initiate and follow the claims procedures provided in this Agreement in a timely manner and as required by the terms thereof, any such claim shall be waived. 4.6 OWNER shall make final compensation for all sums due CONSULTANT not more than 30 days after CONSULTANT'S final Application for Compensation. Main Street Improvements Page 15 4.7 Acceptance of final compensation by CONSULTANT shall constitute a waiver of claims except those previously made in writing and identified by CONSULTANT as unsettled at the time of final Application for Compensation. 4.8 CONSULTANT agrees to maintain adequate books, payrolls and records satisfactory to OWNER and all applicable utility providers in connection with any and all Services performed hereunder. CONSULTANT agrees to retain all such books, payrolls and records (including data stored in computer) for a period of not less than four years after completion of Work. At all reasonable times, OWNER and all applicable utility providers and their duly authorized representatives shall have access to all personnel of CONSULTANT and all such books, payrolls and records, and shall have the right to audit same. ARTICLE 5: TIME, SCHEDULE, AND PERIOD OF SERVICE 5.1 Prior to commencement, CONSULTANT shall provide CITY with a schedule of Project Design Phases, Attachment 2. 5.2 Time is of the essence of this Agreement. CONSULTANT shall perform and complete its obligations for the various Phases of a Project under Section 4, Scope of Services, of this Agreement in a prompt and continuous manner so as to not delay the development of the design Services and so as to not delay the construction of the work for the Project in accordance with the schedules approved by CITY with CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR. Upon review of phase Services, if corrections, modifications, alterations, or additions are required of CONSULTANT, these items shall be completed by CONSULTANT before that Phase is approved. 5.3 CONSULTANT shall not proceed with the next appropriate Phase of Services without written authorization from the Engineer. CITY may elect to discontinue CONSULTANT'S Services at the end of any Phase for any reason. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, if circumstance dictates, the Engineer may make adjustments to the scope of CONSULTANT'S obligations at any time to achieve the required design. 5.4 CONSULTANT shall not be liable or responsible for any delays due to strikes, riots, acts of God, national emergency, acts of the public enemy, governmental restrictions, laws or regulations, or any other causes beyond CONSULTANT'S reasonable control. Within 21 days from the occurrence of any event for which time for performance by CONSULTANT will be significantly extended under this provision, CONSULTANT shall give written notice thereof to CITY stating the reason for such extension and the actual or estimated time thereof. If CITY determines that CONSULTANT is responsible for the need for extended time, CITY shall have the right to make a Claim as provided in this Agreement. 5.5 Term of Agreement shall be as follows: Main Street Improvements Page 16 5.5.1 This Agreement shall become effective upon the date below and shall remain in effect until satisfactory completion of the Project unless terminated as provided for in this Agreement. ARTICLE 6: COORDINATION WITH CITY 6.1 CONSULTANT shall hold periodic conferences with the Engineer or his or her representatives to the end that the Project as developed shall have the full benefit of CITY'S experience and knowledge of existing needs and facilities, and be consistent with its current policies and standards. To assist CONSULTANT in this coordination, CITY shall make available for CONSULTANT'S use in planning and designing the Project all existing plans, maps, statistics, computations and other data in its possession relative to existing facilities and to this particular Project, at no cost to CONSULTANT. However, any and all such information shall remain the property of CITY and shall be returned by CONSULTANT upon termination or completion of the Project or if instructed to do so by the Engineer. 6.2 The Engineer will act on behalf of CITY with respect to the Services to be performed under this Agreement. The Engineer shall have complete authority to transmit instructions, receive information, interpret and define CITY'S policies and decisions with respect to materials, equipment, elements and systems pertinent to CONSULTANT'S services. 6.3 CITY will give prompt written notice to CONSULTANT whenever CITY observes or otherwise become aware of any defect in CONSULTANT'S Services, in the work of CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR, or any development that affects the scope or timing of CONSULTANT'S Services. 6.4 All appraisals, notices, and permits shall be furnished by CONSULTANT under the Scope of Services unless otherwise assigned to CITY in the Scope of Services, Approvals and permits assigned to CITY shall be obtained from all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the Project and such approvals and consents from others as may be necessary for the completion of the Project. CONSULTANT will provide CITY reasonable assistance in connection with such approvals and permits such as the furnishing of data compiled by CONSULTANT pursuant to other provisions of this Agreement, but CONSULTANT shall not be obligated to develop additional data, prepare extensive reports or appear at hearings or the like unless compensated therefore under other provisions of this Agreement. ARTICLE 7: REVISIONS TO DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS 7.1 CONSULTANT shall make without expense to CITY such revisions to the drawings, reports or other documents as may be required to meet the needs of CITY which are within the Scope of Services, but after the approval of drawings, reports or other documents and specifications by CITY, any revisions, additions, or other modifications made at CITY'S request which involve extra services and expenses to CONSULTANT Main Street Improvements Page 17 shall be at additional compensation to CONSULTANT for such additional Services and expenses in accordance with Article 3 herein. ARTICLE 8: OWNERSHIP OF DOCUMENTS 8.1 All previously owned documents, including the original drawings, estimates, specifications, and all other documents and data by CONSULTANT, will remain the property of CONSULTANT as instruments of service. However, CONSULTANT understands and agrees that CITY shall have free access to all such information with the right to make and retain copies of previously owned drawings, estimates, specifications and all other documents and data. Any reuse without specific written verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT will be at CITY'S sole risk and without liability or legal exposure to CONSULTANT. 8.2 All completed documents submitted by CONSULTANT for final approval or issuance of a permit shall bear the seal with signature and date adjacent thereto of a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas. 8.3 CONSULTANT acknowledges and agrees that upon payment, CITY shall own exclusively any and all information in whatsoever form and character produced and/or maintained in accordance with, pursuant to, or as a result of this Agreement and shall be used as CITY desires and documents, including the original drawings, estimates, specifications and all other documents and data shall be delivered to CITY at no additional cost to CITY upon request or termination or completion of this Agreement without restriction on future use. However, any reuse without specific written verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT will be at CITY'S sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. 8.4 CONSULTANT agrees and covenants to protect any and all proprietary rights of CITY in any materials provided to CONSULTANT. Such protection of proprietary rights by CONSULTANT shall include, but not be limited to, the inclusion in any copy intended for publication of copyright mark reserving all rights to CITY. Additionally, any materials provided to CONSULTANT by CITY shall not be released to any third party without the written consent of CITY and shall be returned intact to CITY upon termination or completion of this Agreement or if instructed to do so by the Engineer. 8.5 CONSULTANT HEREBY ASSIGNS ALL STATUTORY AND COMMON LAW COPYRIGHTS TO ANY COPYRIGHTABLE WORK THAT IN PART OR IN WHOLE WAS PRODUCED FROM THIS AGREEMENT TO CITY, INCLUDING ALL EQUITABLE RIGHTS. NO REPORTS, MAPS, DOCUMENTS OR OTHER COPYRIGHTABLE WORKS PRODUCED IN WHOLE OR IN PART BY THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE SUBJECT OF AN APPLICATION FOR COPYRIGHT BY CONSULTANT. ALL REPORTS, MAPS, PROJECT LOGOS, DRAWINGS OR OTHER COPYRIGHTABLE WORK PRODUCED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BECOME THE PROPERTY OF CITY (EXCLUDING ANY PRIOR OWNED INSTRUMENT OF SERVICES, UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN). CONSULTANT SHALL, AT ITS EXPENSE, INDEMNIFY CITY AND Main Street Improvements Page 18 DEFEND ALL SUITS OR PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST CITY AND PAY ANY AWARD OF DAMAGES OR LOSS RESULTING FROM AN INJUNCTION, AGAINST CITY, INSOFAR AS THE SAME ARE BASED ON ANY CLAIM THAT MATERIALS OR WORK PROVIDED UNDER THIS AGREEMENT CONSTITUTE AN INFRINGEMENT OF ANY PATENT, TRADE SECRET, TRADEMARK, COPYRIGHT OR OTHER INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS. 8.6 CONSULTANT may make copies of any and all documents and items for its files. CONSULTANT shall have no liability for changes made to or use of the drawings, specifications and other documents by other engineers, or other persons, subsequent to the completion of the Project. CONSULTANT shall appropriately mark all changes or modifications on all drawings, specifications and other documents by other engineers or other persons, including electronic copies, subsequent to the completion of the Project. 8.7 Copies of documents that may be relied upon by CITY are limited to the printed copies (also known as hard copies) and .pdf- format electronic versions that are sealed and signed by CONSULTANT. Files in editable electronic media format of text, data, graphics, or other types (such as .dwg) that are furnished by CONSULTANT to CITY are only for convenience of CITY or any utility. Any conclusion or information obtained or derived from such electronic files will be at the user's sole risk. Any reuse without specific written verification or adaptation by CONSULTANT will be at CITY'S sole risk and without liability to CONSULTANT. 8.8 Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, all previously owned intellectual property of CONSULTANT, unless expressly purchased by CITY, including but not limited to any computer software (object code and source code), tools, systems, equipment or other information used by CONSULTANT or its suppliers in the course of delivering the Services hereunder, and any know -how, methodologies, or processes used by CONSULTANT to provide the services or protect deliverables to CITY, including without limitation, all copyrights, trademarks, patents, trade secrets, and any other proprietary rights inherent therein and appurtenant thereto shall remain the sole and exclusive property of CONSULTANT or its suppliers. ARTICLE 9: TERMINATION AND /OR SUSPENSION OF WORK 9.1 Right of Either Party to Terminate for Default 9.1.1 This Agreement may be terminated by either party for substantial failure by the other party to perform (through no fault of the terminating party) in accordance with the terms of this Agreement and a failure to cure as provided in this Article 9. 9.1.2 The party not in default must issue a signed, written notice of termination (citing this paragraph) to the other party declaring the other party to be in default and stating the reason(s) why they are in default. Upon receipt of such written notice of default, the party in receipt shall have a period of ten days to cure any failure to Main Street Improvements Page 19 perform under this Agreement. Upon the completion of such 10 -day period commencing upon receipt of notice of termination, if such party has not cured any failure to perform, such termination shall become effective without further written notice. 9.2 Right of CITY to Terminate 9.2.1 CITY reserves the right to terminate this Agreement for reasons other than substantial failure by CONSULTANT to perform by issuing a signed, written notice of termination (citing this paragraph) which shall take effect on the twentieth day following receipt of said notice or upon the scheduled completion date of the performance Phase in which CONSULTANT is then currently working, whichever effective termination date occurs first. 9.3 Right of CITY to Suspend Giving Rise to Right of CONSULTANT to Terminate 9.3.1 CITY reserves the right to suspend this Agreement at the end of any Phase for the convenience of CITY by issuing a signed, written notice of suspension (citing this paragraph) which shall outline the reasons for the suspension and the expected duration of the suspension, but such expected duration shall in no way guarantee what the total number of days of suspension will occur. Such suspension shall take effect immediately upon receipt of said notice of suspension by CONSULTANT. 9.3.1.1 CONSULTANT is hereby given the right to terminate this Agreement in the event such suspension extends for a period in excess of 120 days. CONSULTANT may exercise this right to terminate by issuing a signed, written notice of termination (citing this paragraph) to CITY after the expiration of 120 days from the effective date of the suspension. Termination (under this paragraph) shall become effective immediately upon receipt of said written notice by CITY. 9.4 Procedures CONSULTANT Shall Follow upon Receipt of Notice of Termination 9.4.1 Upon receipt of a notice of termination and prior to the effective date of termination, unless the notice otherwise directs or CONSULTANT immediately takes action to cure a failure to perform under the cure period set out in this Article. CONSULTANT shall immediately begin the phase -out and the discontinuance of all services in connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed to promptly cancel all existing orders and contracts insofar as such orders and contracts are chargeable to this Agreement. Within 30 days after receipt of such notice of termination (unless CONSULTANT has successfully cured a failure to perform) CONSULTANT shall submit a statement showing in detail the Services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination. CITY shall have the option to grant an extension to the time period for submittal of such statement. Main Street Improvements Page 20 9.4.2 Copies of all completed or partially completed specifications and all reproductions of all completed or partially completed designs, plans and attachments prepared under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination shall be delivered to CITY, in the form requested by CITY as a precondition to final payment. These documents shall be subject to the restrictions and conditions set forth in Article IX above. 9.4.3 Upon the above conditions being met, CITY shall promptly pay CONSULTANT that proportion of the prescribed Compensation which the Services actually performed under this Agreement bear to the total Services called for under this Agreement, less previous payments of the Compensation. 9.4.4 CITY, as a public entity, has a duty to document the expenditure of public funds. CONSULTANT acknowledges this duty on the part of CITY. To this end, CONSULTANT understands that failure of CONSULTANT to comply with the submittal of the statement and documents as required above shall constitute a waiver by CONSULTANT of any and all rights or claims for compensation for services performed under this Agreement by CONSULTANT. 9.4.5 Failure of CONSULTANT to comply with the submittal of the statement and documents as required above shall constitute a waiver by CONSULTANT of any and all rights or claims to collect monies that CONSULTANT may otherwise be entitled to for services performed under this Agreement. 9.5 Procedures CONSULTANT Shall Follow upon Receipt of Notice of Suspension 9.5.1 Upon receipt of written notice of suspension, which date shall also be the effective date of the suspension, CONSULTANT shall, unless the notice otherwise directs, immediately begin to phase -out and discontinue all services in connection with the performance of this Agreement and shall proceed to promptly suspend all existing orders and contracts insofar as such orders and contracts are chargeable to this Agreement. 9.5.2 CONSULTANT shall prepare a statement showing in detail the Services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of suspension. 9.5.3 Copies of all completed or partially completed designs, plans, and specifications prepared under this Agreement prior to the effective date of suspension shall be prepared for possible delivery to CITY but shall be retained by CONSULTANT until such time as CONSULTANT may exercise the right to terminate. 9.5.4 In the event that CONSULTANT exercises the right to terminate 120 days after the effective suspension date, within 30 days after receipt by CITY of CONSULTANT'S notice of termination, CONSULTANT shall promptly cancel all existing orders and contracts insofar as such orders and contracts are chargeable to this Agreement and shall submit the above referenced statement showing in detail the services performed under this Agreement prior to the effective date of suspension. Main Street Improvements Page 21 9.5.5 Any documents prepared in association with this Agreement shall be delivered to CITY as a precondition to final payment. 9.5.6 Upon the above conditions being met, CITY shall pay CONSULTANT that proportion of the prescribed Compensation which the Services actually performed under this Agreement bear to the total Services called for under this Agreement, less previous payments of Compensation. 9.5.7 CITY, as a public entity, has a duty to document the expenditure of public funds. CONSULTANT acknowledges this duty on the part of CITY. To this end, CONSULTANT understands that failure of Consultant to substantially comply with the submittal of the statements and documents as required herein shall constitute a waiver by CONSULTANT of any portion of the Compensation for which CONSULTANT did not supply such necessary statements and/or documents. ARTICLE 10: CONSULTANT'S WARRANTY 10.1 CONSULTANT warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person other than a bona fide employee working solely for CONSULTANT to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that it has not, for the purpose of soliciting or securing this Agreement, paid or agreed to pay any company or person, commission, percentage, brokerage fee, gift, or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. For breach of this warranty, CITY shall have the right to terminate this Agreement under the provisions of Article 9 above. ARTICLE 11: ASSSIGNMENT OR TRANSFER OF INTEREST 11.1 CONSULTANT shall not assign or transfer its interest in this Agreement without the prior written consent of CITY. ARTICLE 12: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 12.1 Prior to the commencement of any Services under this Agreement, CONSULTANT shall furnish copies of all required endorsements and an original completed Certificate(s) of Insurance to CITY'S Engineering Department, which shall be clearly identified with the name of the Project in the Description of Operations block of the Certificate. The original Certificate(s) shall be completed by an agent and signed by a person authorized by that insurer to bind coverage on its behalf. CITY will not accept Memorandum of Insurance or Binders as proof of insurance. The original certificate(s) or form must have the agent's original signature, including the signer's company affiliation, title and phone number, and be mailed, with copies of all applicable endorsements, directly from the insurer's authorized representative to CITY. CITY shall have no duty to pay or perform under this Agreement until such certificate and endorsements have been received and approved by CITY'S Engineering Department. No officer or employee other than CITY'S Risk Manager shall have authority to waive this requirement. Main Street Improvements Page 22 12.2 CITY reserves the right to review the insurance requirements of this Article during the effective period of this contract and any extension or renewal hereof and to request modification of insurance coverage's and their limits when deemed necessary and prudent by CITY'S Risk Manager based upon changes in statutory law, court decisions, or circumstances surrounding this contract. In no instance will CITY allow modification whereupon CITY may incur increased risk. 12.3 CONSULTANT'S financial integrity is of interest to CITY. Therefore, subject to CONSULTANT'S right to maintain reasonable deductibles in such amounts as are approved by CITY, CONSULTANT shall obtain and maintain in full force and effect for the duration of this Agreement, and any extension hereof, at CONSULTANT'S sole expense, insurance coverage written on an occurrence or claims made basis, as appropriate, by companies authorized and approved to do business in the State of Texas and with an A.M. Best's rating of no less than A- (VII), in the following types and for an amount not less than the amount listed: INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS Worker's Compensation* Employer's Liability Commercial General (Public) Liability insurance to include coverage for the following: a. Premises Operations b. Independent Contractors ** c. Products /Completed Operations d. Personal Injury e. Contractual Liability Statutory $1,000,000 /$1,000,000 /$1,000,000 For Bodily Injury and Property Damage of $1,000,000 per occurrence. $2,000,000 General Aggregate, or its equivalent in Umbrella or Excess Liability Coverage Business Automobile Liability Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury and a. Owned/Leased Vehicles property Damage of $1,000,000 per occurrence b. Non -owned Vehicles c. Hired Vehicles Professional Liability (Claims Made Form) $1,000,000 per claim to pay on behalf of the insured all sums, which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages to the extent caused by any negligent act, error, or omission in the performance of professional services. *Alternate Plans must be approved by CITY'S Risk Manager * *If applicable Main Street Improvements Page 23 12.4 CITY may request and without expense to CITY, to inspect copies of the policies, declarations page and all endorsements thereto as they apply to the limits required by CITY, and may request the deletion, revision, or modification of particular policy terms, conditions, limitations or exclusions (except where policy provisions are established by law or regulation binding upon either of the parties hereto or the underwriter of any such policies). CONSULTANT shall attempt to comply with any such requests, subject to the policy terms and conditions, and shall submit a copy of the replacement certificate of insurance to CITY at the address provided below within 10 days of the requested change, in the event the respective insurance companies approve the requested change(s). CONSULTANT shall pay any costs incurred resulting from said changes. City of Schertz Attn: City Engineer 10 Commercial Place Schertz, TX 78154 12.5 CONSULTANT agrees that with respect to the above required insurance, all insurance policies are to contain or be endorsed to contain the following required provisions: 12.5.1 Name CITY and its officers, officials, employees, and elected representatives as additional insured's by endorsement, as respects operations and activities of, or on behalf of, the named insured performed under contract with CITY, with the exception of the workers' compensation and professional liability policies; 12.5.2 Provide for an endorsement that the "other insurance" clause shall not apply to the CITY where CITY is an additional insured shown on the policy if such endorsement is permitted by law and regulations; 12.5.3 Workers' compensation and employers' liability policies will provide a waiver of subrogation in favor of CITY; and 12.5.4 Provide 30 calendar days advance written notice directly to CITY of any suspension, cancellation or non - renewal or material change in coverage, and not less than 10 calendar days advance written notice for nonpayment of premium. 12.6 Within five calendar days after a suspension, cancellation or non - renewal of coverage, CONSULTANT shall provide a replacement Certificate of Insurance and applicable endorsements to CITY. CITY shall have the option to suspend CONSULTANT'S performance should there be a lapse in coverage at any time during this Agreement. Failure to provide and to maintain the required insurance shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. 12.7 If CONSULTANT fails to maintain the aforementioned insurance, or fails to secure and maintain the aforementioned endorsements, CITY may obtain such insurance, and deduct and retain the amount of the premiums for such insurance from any sums due under the agreement; however, procuring of said insurance by CITY is an alternative to other remedies CITY may have and is not the exclusive remedy for failure of CONSULTANT to maintain said insurance or secure such endorsement. In addition to any other remedies Main Street Improvements Page 24 CITY may have upon CONSULTANT'S failure to provide and maintain any insurance or policy endorsements to the extent and within the time herein required, CITY shall have the right to order CONSULTANT to stop performing services hereunder and/or withhold any payment(s) which become due to CONSULTANT hereunder until CONSULTANT demonstrates compliance with the requirements hereof. 12.8 Nothing herein contained shall be construed as limiting in any way the extent to which CONSULTANT may be held responsible for payments of damages to persons or property resulting from CONSULTANT'S or its subconsultant's performance of the Services covered under this Agreement. 12.9 It is agreed that CONSULTANT'S insurance shall be deemed primary with respect to any insurance or self insurance carried by CITY for liability arising out of operations under this Agreement. 12.10 It is understood and agreed that the insurance required is in addition to and separate from any other obligation contained in this Agreement as respects additional insured's. ARTICLE 13: INDEMNIFICATION 13.1 CONSULTANT, WHOSE WORK PRODUCT AND SERVICES ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES, AGREES TO INDEMNIFY AND HOLD CITY, ITS ELECTED OFFICIALS, OFFICERS, AGENTS AND EMPLOYEES HARMLESS AGAINST ANY AND ALL CLAIMS BY THIRD PARTIES, LAWSUITS, JUDGMENTS, COST, LIENS, LOSSES, EXPENSES, FEES (INCLUDING REASONABLE ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS OF DEFENSE), PROCEEDINGS, ACTIONS, DEMANDS, CAUSES OF ACTION, LIABILITY AND SUITS OF ANY KIND AND NATURE, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PERSONAL INJURY (INCLUDING DEATH), PROPERTY DAMAGE, OR OTHER HARM FOR WHICH RECOVERY OF DAMAGES IS SOUGHT THAT MAY ARISE OUT OF OR BE OCCASIONED OR CAUSED BY A NEGLIGENT ACT, ERROR, OR OMISSION OF CONSULTANT, ANY AGENT, OFFICER, ENGINEER, REPRESENTATIVE, EMPLOYEE, CONSULTANT OR SUBCONSULTANT OF CONSULTANT, AND THEIR RESPECTIVE OFFICERS, AGENTS, EMPLOYEES, ENGINEERS AND REPRESENTATIVES WHILE IN THE EXERCISE OF PERFORMANCE OF THE SERVICES, RIGHTS OR DUTIES UNDER THIS AGREEMENT. THE INDEMNITY PROVIDED FOR IN THIS PARAGRAPH SHALL NOT APPLY TO ANY LIABILITY RESULTING FROM THE NEGLIGENCE OF CITY, ITS OFFICERS OR EMPLOYEES, IN INSTANCES WHERE SUCH NEGLIGENCE CAUSES PERSONAL INJURY, DEATH, OR PROPERTY DAMAGE. IN THE EVENT CONSULTANT AND CITY ARE FOUND JOINTLY LIABLE BY A COURT OF COMPETENT JURISDICTION, LIABILITY SHALL BE APPORTIONED COMPARATIVELY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF TEXAS, WITHOUT, HOWEVER, WAIVING ANY GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY AVAILABLE TO CITY UNDER TEXAS LAW Main Street Improvements Page 25 AND WITHOUT WAIVING ANY DEFENSES OF THE PARTIES UNDER TEXAS LAW. 13.2 CONSULTANT shall advise CITY in writing within 24 hours of any claim or demand against CITY or CONSULTANT, known to CONSULTANT, related to or arising out of CONSULTANT'S activities under this Agreement. 13.3 The provisions of Article 13 are solely for the benefit of the parties hereto and not intended to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise, to any other person or entity. 13.4 Acceptance of the final plans by CITY shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of CONSULTANT, its employees, associates, agents or subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of their designs, work drawings, Plans and Specifications or other documents and Work; nor shall such acceptance be deemed an assumption of responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect in the designs, work drawings, Plans and Specifications or other documents and Work prepared by CONSULTANT, its employees, subconsultants, and agents. ARTICLE 14: CLAIMS AND DISPUTES 14.1 Definition. A Claim is a demand or assertion by one of the parties seeking, as a matter of right, adjustment or interpretation of this Agreement's terms, payment of money, and extension of time or other relief with respect to the terms of this Agreement. The term "Claim" also includes other disputes and matters in question between OWNER and CONSULTANT arising out of or relating to this Agreement. Claims must be initiated by written notice. Every Claim of CONSULTANT, whether for additional Compensation, additional time, or other relief, shall be signed and sworn to by an authorized corporate officer (if not a corporation, then an official of the company authorized to bind CONSULTANT by signature) of CONSULTANT, verifying the truth and accuracy of the Claim. The responsibility to substantiate Claims shall rest with the party making the Claim. 14.2 Time Limit on Claims. Claims by CONSULTANT or by OWNER must be initiated within 30 calendar days after occurrence of the event giving rise to such Claim. Claims by CONSULTANT must be initiated by written notice to OWNER. Claims by the OWNER must be initiated by written notice to CONSULTANT. 14.3 Continuing Contract Performance. Pending final resolution of a Claim except as otherwise agreed in writing, CONSULTANT shall proceed diligently with performance of this Agreement and OWNER shall continue to make payments in accordance with this Agreement. 14.4 Claims for Additional Time. If CONSULTANT wishes to make Claim for an increase in the time for performance, written notice as provided in this Article 14 shall be given. CONSULTANT'S Claim shall include an estimate of probable effect of delay on progress of the Work. In the case of a continuing delay only one Claim is necessary. Main Street Improvements Page 26 14.5 Claims for Consequential Damages. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, in calculating the amount of any Claim or any measure of damages for breach of contract (such provision to survive any termination following such breach), the following standards will apply both to claims by CONSULTANT and to claims by OWNER: 14.5.1 No consequential damages will be allowed. 14.5.2 Damages are limited to extra costs specifically shown to have been directly caused by a proven wrong for which the other party is claimed to be responsible. 14.5.3 No profit will be allowed on any damage claim. 14.6 No Waiver of Governmental Immunity. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO WAIVE OWNER'S GOVERNMENTAL IMMUNITY FROM LAWSUIT, WHICH IMMUNITY IS EXPRESSLY RETAINED TO THE EXTENT IT IS NOT CLEARLY AND UNAMBIGUOUSLY WAIVED BY STATE LAW. ARTICLE 15: SEVERABILITY 15.1 If for any reason, any one or more paragraphs of this Agreement are held invalid or unenforceable, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remaining paragraphs of this Agreement but shall be confined in its effect to the specific section, sentences, clauses or parts of this Agreement held invalid or unenforceable, and the invalidity or unenforceability of any section, sentence, clause or parts of this Agreement in any one or more instance shall not affect or prejudice in any way the validity of this Agreement in any other instance. ARTICLE 16: ESTIMATES OF COST 16.1 Since CONSULTANT has no control over the cost of labor, materials, or equipment or over CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR'S methods of determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions, CONSULTANT'S opinions of probable Project Cost or Construction Cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of CONSULTANT'S experience and qualifications and represent CONSULTANT'S best judgment as a design professional familiar with the construction industry but CONSULTANT cannot and does not guarantee that bids or the construction cost will not vary from opinions of probable Cost prepared by CONSULTANT. ARTICLE 17: INTEREST IN CITY CONTRACTS PROHIBITED 17.1 No officer or employee of CITY shall have a financial interest, directly or indirectly, in any contract with CITY, or shall be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in the sale to CITY of any land, materials, supplies or service, except on behalf of CITY as an officer or employee. This prohibition extends to other CITY boards and commissions, which are more than purely advisory. The prohibition also applies to subcontracts on CITY projects. Main Street Improvements Page 27 17.2 CONSULTANT acknowledges that it is informed that the Charter of CITY prohibits a CITY officer or employee, as those terms are defined in the Ethics Code, from having a financial interest in any contract with CITY or any CITY agency. 17.3 CONSULTANT warrants and certifies, and this Agreement is made in reliance thereon, that it, its officers, employees and agents are neither officers nor employees of CITY. CONSULTANT further warrants and certifies that it has tendered to CITY a Discretionary Contracts Disclosure Statement. ARTICLE 18: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE 18.1 All consultants must disclose if it is associated in any manner with a CITY official or employee in a business venture or business dealings. To be "associated" in a business venture or business dealings includes being in a partnership or joint venture with the officer or employee, having a contract with the officer or employee, being joint owners of a business, owning at least 10% of the stock in a corporation in which a CITY officer or employee also owns at least 10 %, or having an established business relationship as client or customer. ARTICLE 19: STANDARD OF CARE 19.1 Services provided by CONSULTANT under this Agreement will be performed in a manner consistent with that degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the same profession currently practicing under similar circumstances. 19.2 CONSULTANT shall be represented by a registered professional engineer licensed to practice in the State of Texas at meetings of any official nature concerning the Project, including but not limited to scope meetings, review meetings, pre -bid meetings, and preconstruction meetings. 19.3 The Texas Board of Professional Engineers, 1917 IH -35 South, Austin, Texas 78741, (512) 440 -7723 has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under Title 22 of the Texas Administrative Code. 19.4 Acceptance of the final plans by CITY shall not constitute nor be deemed a release of the responsibility and liability of CONSULTANT, its employees, associates, agents, or subcontractors for the accuracy and competency of their designs, work drawings, Plans and Specifications or other documents and Work; nor shall such acceptance be deemed an assumption of responsibility or liability by CITY for any defect in the designs, work drawings, Plans and Specifications or other documents and Work prepared by CONSULTANT, its employees, subconsultants, and agents. ARTICLE 20: RIGHT OF REVIEW AND AUDIT 20.1 CONSULTANT agrees that CITY may review any and all of the work performed by CONSULTANT UNDER THIS Agreement. CITY is granted the right to audit, at CITY'S election, all of CONSULTANT'S records and billings related to performance of this Agreement. CONSULTANT agrees to retain such records for a minimum of four Main Street Improvements Page 28 years following completion of this Agreement. Any payment, settlement, satisfaction, or release provided under this Agreement shall be subject to CITY'S rights as may be disclosed by such audit. ARTICLE 21: ENTIRE AGREEMENT 21.1 This Agreement, together with Attachments 1, 2, 3, and 4, represents the entire and integrated agreement between CITY and CONSULTANT and supersedes all prior negotiations, representations, or agreements, either oral or written. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument signed by both CITY and CONSULTANT. ARTICLE 22: VENUE 22.1 The obligations of the parties to this Agreement shall be performable in the City of Schertz or its Extra Territorial Jurisdiction, located in Bexar, Comal, and Guadalupe Counties, Texas, and if legal action, such as civil litigation, is necessary in connection therewith, exclusive venue shall lie in Guadalupe County, Texas. ARTICLE 23: NOTICES 23.1 Except as may be provided elsewhere herein, all notices, communications, and reports required or permitted under this Contract shall be personally delivered or mailed to the respective party by depositing the same in the United States Postal Service addressed to the applicable address shown below, unless and until either party is otherwise notified in writing by the other party of a change of such address. Mailed notices shall be deemed communicated as of five calendar days of mailing. Notices provided via email shall be deemed communicated as of the next business day after the notice is sent. If intended for CITY, to: If intended for CONSULTANT, to: City of Schertz Engineering Department 10 Commercial Place Schertz, Texas 78154 The address listed on the first page of this Agreement. ARTICLE 24: INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR 24.1 In performing services under this Agreement, the relationship between CITY and CONSULTANT is that of independent contractor. By the execution of this Agreement, CONSULTANT and CITY do not change the independent contractor status of CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT shall exercise independent judgment in performing its duties and obligations under this Agreement and is solely responsible for setting working hours, scheduling or prioritizing the work flow and determining how the Services are to be performed. No term or provision of this Agreement or act of CONSULTANT in the performance of this Agreement shall be construed as making CONSULTANT the agent, Main Street Improvements Page 29 servant or employee of CITY, or as making CONSULTANT or any of its agents or employees eligible for any fringe benefits, such as retirement, insurance and worker's compensation, which CITY provides to or for its employees. ARTICLE 25: CAPTIONS 25.1 The captions for the individual provisions of this Agreement are for informational purposes only and shall not be construed to effect or modify the substance of the terms and conditions of this Agreement to which any caption relates. Main Street Improvements Page 30 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties to this Agreement hereby execute this Agreement effective as of , 2017 (the "Effective Date "). CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY MANAGER CONSULTANT Consultant Name TITLE Main Street Improvements Page 31 ATTACHMENT 1 PROJECT SCOPE OF SERVICES Consultant will provide civil engineering professional consulting services for the City for design, bid and construction services for the improvements to Main Street. It is anticipated that the project will follow the following phases: Preliminary, 100% design, Bid, and Construction Phases. Design services will include civil design services to prepare the construction plans and bid documents. Also, consulting services will be provided during the bid phase and construction phase of the project to assist the City in completing a successful project. Further specification of the scope of work is detailed in Article 2 of this agreement. Main Street Improvements Page 32 ATTACHMENT 2 PROJECT COST Attachment A - Fee Schedule City of Schertz Main St Improvements o = FEE ESTIMATE FOR CITY OF SCHERTZ MAIN ST PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT L n- w w 43 U a M sr tf = Cast 5 +90.00 $180.30 5'50.06 $130.00 $115.013 $180.1#1 $195.O13 $85.156 TASK HOURS TOTAL Preliminary Conce uall Phase 28.1 Coordination with City of Scheriz (1 meeting) 4 $ 680.006 2 -112 Develop Altemadves and OPCC for each Alternative, Technical Merno, Exhibits, QaQC Technical Memo D3 ment - ' ±" 40 56 fi 142 $ 18,.310.006 2.8.3 Pre arationratendance for Public hleetin s ( 2 ) 4 14 $ 1,740.00D (rime Subtotalj DI 81 121 1 401 54 (11 6 1 121 11601 S 2D,73D.OD Architect - Rialto's Fee I 1 1 $ 21,110.30G Prel im in a ry P hase Su btatal I S 41.84D -OD Design Phase 2.71 Three Progress Meetings with the City of Schertz - 6 2 8 S 2,330.00D 2 -7.2 Field Survey fro ra hic data) for the entire pTnject 8 24 32 $ 5,g8O.0OD 2.73 Coordination with Geotech Sub 2 2 4 $ 560.00D 2.7.4 Coordination with Architects Sub 4 4 8 16 $ 2,280.00D 2 -7.5 lCoordination with 7xDQ7, TDLR 4 4 8 $ 1,240.006 2.7.8 Utility Coordination 4 12 12 12 4 44 $ 5,640.00D 2 -7.7 Develop Constniction Documents Cover Sheet 1 1 2 8 16 27 $ 3,340A0D General Notes 4 1 2 8 16 27 $ 3,340AOD Quantities 2 1 2 24 36 93 $ 7,720006 Dimension Control 41 1 4 24 24 53 $ 6,640.00D 7yocal Sections 6 1 4 32 46 77 $ 9,.520.006 Road Plan Set 8 11 4 32 4D 77 $ 9,520.0013 Readwa }Site I]etails 6 1 4 161 Q1 61 $ 7,440.90D SVVPPPlEPICENV Sheet 8 1 2 8 24 35 $ 4,2100.0OC 2.7.8 Des•elop Opinion of Probable Costa I:OPCC ;� 1 4 9 2 15 $ 1,930.00C .7.9 1memal QxQC o` the entire Plan set and OF-CC 2 4 8 2 14 $ 2,350.30C Prime Subtotall 01 l3 31 5a 182 25D 8 24 8 561 $ 74,070AOD Architect - Rialto's Fee $ 21,680.00D Gewech - Raba Kisner Feel I I I I I I I I I 1 S 7.400:300. Design Phase Subtotal I $ 103,1310.00 Bid Phase 2.8.1 Develop Bid Form, Pmt de to City of Schertz 2 4 2 8 $ 1,00.00D 28.2 Provide Front End Documents,. Technical Specifications and all necessary Documents [Assurning EJCDC Contract Documents 4 8 8 8 24 $ 3,1100.00D 2.6.3 Attend the Pre -Bid Conference, prepare responses and addenda as necessary 4 4 4 12 $ 1,380.00D 2.8.4 Research bidders, prevnde Letter of Recoornendatiom to City of Schertz 2 4 2 U 8 $ 1, 180.006 Prime Subtotal 0 4 12 215 6 6 (1 D 14 522 $ 8,616 -06 Bid Phase Subtotal 1 $ 6,61D.OD Constructhm Rdzse 2.9.1 Este Visits (1 per week at 4 hrs per visit - (assummed 9 month duratoin) 1 361 351 041 1 1 1 156 $ 22,DSO.00D 2.92 Adress RFIs and Shop Draveings 1 161 241 401 1 1 1 80 $ 11,380.9015 2 -9.3 Develop Punch Iist6Gwrdinate with City of Schertz 1 21 41 1 1 1 1 21 8 $ 1,650.006 2 -9.4 Develop Plan of Record IA.sbuiltsl 1 21 1 81 241 1 1 1 34 5 4,120.000 -rime Subtotal C-1 El 501 C41 132 2-11 DI 01 21 2781 5 38,91D.0C Architect - Rialto's Feel I I I I I I I I I I 5 5,760.000 Construction °hase Subtotall S 38,61D -00 Total for Engineering Base Fee 2CI 1111 175 3601 3281 51 241 35 1651 F $190,190. an Main Street Improvements Page 33 ATTACHMENT 3 ADDITIONAL SERVICES AND/OR EXPANDED SCOPE OF SERVICES To be completed as necessary. CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY MANAGER CONSULTANT Consultant Name TITLE Main Street Improvements Page 34 Agenda No. 7 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Finance Subject: Resolution 17 -R -12 — A resolution by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas authorizing investment brokers, and other matters in connection therewith BACKGROUND To purchase securities as investment opportunities, the City must go through an investment broker. These firms purchase investment securities in the market on the City's behalf and provide detail research to help us make better decisions that fit our needs. If the City wanted to purchase a security as an investment it would contact Capital One, our investment management firm, and give them our criteria on the type of security the City wants. Capital One would go to an authorized broker who would make the actual purchase on our behalf. Brokers act as middle -men between the buyers and sellers of the investment securities. The Texas Government Code Sec. 2256.025, part of the Public Funds Investment Act, requires City Council to adopt a list of authorized investment brokers annually. Based on a review of the Act and current practices by the new Finance Director it was determined this needed to be brought before council going forward. The City needs to be in compliance with this act and has submitted a list of brokers used by our investment management firm, Capital One. Capital One, acting as the City's investment management firm, carries out the review process that is required of the firms. They work with the Finance Department to organize and structure our investment portfolio. The Finance Department reviews investment transactions monthly to make sure the City's investment policy and strategy is being followed. To review the Public Funds Investment Act please use the following link: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/GV/htm/GV.2256.htm FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution 17 -R -12 authorizing certain investment brokers to be used by the City and its financial advisors. City Council Memorandum Page 2 ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -R -12 Exhibit A — Broker List City of Schertz Investment Policy & Strategy RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -12 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING INVESTMNET BROKERS, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Texas Government Code Sec. 2256.025, part of the Public Funds Investment Act, requires City Council to adopt a list of authorized investment brokers annually; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City approve the proposed list of investment brokers; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approved the proposed list of investment brokers attached hereto as Exhibit A. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and the Investment Officers use the list of brokers to secure investments in compliance to the City Investment Policy and Strategy and the Public Funds Investment Act set forth on Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 5023481 1.1 EXHIBIT A LIST OF APPROVED INVESTMENT BROKERS 1.) Banc of America Securities, LLC 24,) Knight Capital Group 2.) Barclays Capital Inc. 25.) Key Banc Capital Markets 3.) BMO Capital Markets GKST Inc. 26.) Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. 4.) BNY ConvergEx Execution 27.) Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. Solutions, LLC 28.) Piper laffray 5.) BNY Mellon Capital Markets LLC 29.,) Raymond James & Associates, 6.) BTIG LLC Inc. 7.) Capital Institutional Services 3D.) Robert W. Baird & Company, Inc. 8.) CF Global Trading, LLC 31.) Roosevelt & Cross 9.) Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. 32.) South Street .Securities (Repo 1a) Credit Suisse Securities (USA), Broker) LLC 31) Southwest Securities Group, Inc:. 11.) Crews & Associates, Inc. 34.) Stephens Inc. 12.) D.A. Davidson 35.) Stlfel, Nicolaus & Company, Inc. 13.) Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc 36,) Strategas Securities, LLC 14.) Dorsey & Company, Inc 37.) SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, 15.) Duncan Williams Inc. 16.) Fifth Third Securities, Inc. 38.) Susquehanna International 17.) FTN Financial Services, Inc. Group, LLP 18.) Goldman Sachs & Co. 39.) UBS Financial Services, Inc. 19.) Hutchinson, Shockey, Erley & 4[l.) UMB Financial Services, Inc. Co., Inc. 41.) U.S. Bancorp Investments, inc. 20.) INTL FCStone Financial Inc. 42.) Wells Fargo Institutional 21.) Janney Montgomery Scott LLC Securities, LLC 22.) Jeff eries & Co. 43.) William Blair & Co. 23.) J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. 50234811.1 A -1 CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS INVESTMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INVESTMENT SCOPE ............................................................................ ............................... 1 GeneralStatement ............................................................................. ............................... 1 FundsIncluded ................................................................................... ............................... 1 FundsExcluded .................................................................................. ............................... 1 II. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES .............................................................. ............................... 1 GeneralStatement ............................................................................. ............................... 1 Safety................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Liquidity.............................................................................................. ............................... 2 Diversification.................................................................................... ............................... 2 Yield.................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Maturity .................... ............................... .........................Error! Bookmark not defined. PublicTrust ........................................................................................ ............................... 3 PortfolioManagement ....................................................................... ............................... 3 InvestmentStrategy ........................................................................... ............................... 3 III. INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL ..................... ............................... 3 City's Investment Delegate ................................................................ ............................... 3 Selecting And Processing Investments ............................................. ............................... 4 Documenting Investments And Providing Details .......................... ............................... 4 Developing Cash Flow Projections For All Portfolios .................... ............................... 4 Determining Cash Available For Investment ................Error! Bookmark not defined. Monitoring Investment Performance ............................................... ............................... 4 Reconciling Investment Records And General Ledger .................. ............................... 5 Allocating Interest Revenue .............................................................. ............................... 5 Providing Revenue Estimates For All Portfolios ............................ ............................... 5 Prudence............................................................................................. ............................... 5 Business Relationships of City Manager and Investment Officers .............................. 5 Liability of City Manager and Investment Officers ....................... ............................... 6 IV. INVESTMENT REPORTING .............................................................. ............................... 6 QuarterlyReport ............................................................................... ............................... 6 Investment Advisory Committee ...................................................... ............................... 7 AnnualReview ................................................................................... ............................... 8 InvestmentTraining .......................................................................... ............................... 8 Notification of Investment Changes or Defaults ............................. ............................... 9 ComplianceAudit .............................................................................. ............................... 9 V. INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS .......................................................... ............................... 8 Authorized Investment Instruments ................................................ ............................... 8 VI. INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS ........................................................ ............................... 11 -i- Investment Institutions Defined ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Selection wfBank And SeouritiemDealeno ----------------------- ll VII. COLLATERAL AND SAFEKEEPING ............................................... ll Collateral or Insurance For Deposits ............................................................................ l2 Safekeeping _____-------------------------------.---l2 Delivery vs. ----.-----------------------------..l2 I. INVESTMENT SCOPE General Statement This policy (this "Policy ") serves to satisfy the statutory requirement of the Public Funds Investment Act, as amended, Texas Government Code Chapter 2256, as amended (the "Act "), to define and adopt a formal written investment policy for the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City "). The City shall be authorized to invest its funds pursuant to the provisions of the Act and this Policy or, upon obtaining the prior approval of the City Council of the City (the "City Council "), any other applicable law. Funds Included This Policy applies to all City funds under the direct control of the City, at the present time any funds to be received in the future and any other funds held in custody by the City, unless expressly prohibited by law or unless it is in contravention of any depository contract between the City and any depository bank. The City funds that are entrusted to the City Council for investment pursuant to this Policy are divided into the following portfolios based on the source of funds: The operating account portfolio that consists of funds from the general fund and all other miscellaneous funds. The agency funds portfolio, which consists of all agency funds. Special Revenue, Special Assessment, and all other City funds. Funds Excluded This Policy shall not be applicable to any funds on deposit in any bond account, reserve account, or capital improvement construction account. The provisions of the ordinances authorizing the issuance of these debt obligations and the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended control the investment of funds on deposit in these accounts. II. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES General Statement Funds of the City will be invested in accordance with the Act, this Policy, written investment strategy, and written administrative procedures to be developed by the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers. The City's investment portfolio shall be managed in a manner to attain the maximum rate of return allowed through prudent and legal investing of City funds while preserving and protecting capital in the overall portfolio. 1 Safety The primary objective of the City for all portfolios and funds is to ensure the safety of the principal. All investment transactions shall first seek to avoid capital losses. = The City's investment portfolio must be structured in a manner that will provide the liquidity necessary to meet all operating requirements which might reasonably be anticipated, and to pay obligations as they become due. Diversification The policy of the City, except when investing with the City's depository bank or in U.S. Treasury Bills, Bonds or Notes, will be to diversify its investment portfolio when investing in certificates of deposit of other banks and savings and loans domiciled in Texas, repurchase agreements, U.S. agencies securities, and other investment instruments provided for by law. The City's portfolio shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over concentration of assets in a specific maturity, a specific issuer or a specific class of investments. Investments of the City shall always be selected to provide stability of income and reasonable liquidity. Liquidity is defined as the ability to sell an investment at reasonable cost under adverse market conditions. In establishing specific diversification strategies, the following general polices and constraints shall apply: (1) Portfolio maturities shall be staggered in a way that avoids undue concentration of assets in a specific maturity sector. Maturities shall be selected which provide for stability of income and reasonable liquidity. (2) Liquidity shall be maintained through practices that ensure that the next disbursement date and payroll date are covered through current revenues, maturing investments, or marketable securities. (3) Risks of market price volatility shall be controlled through maturity diversification. Yield It is the objective of the City to earn the maximum rate of return allowed on its investments within the constraints imposed by its safety and liquidity objectives, and the applicable law governing the investment of public funds. The City must invest its portfolios in eligible investments that yield the highest possible rate of return while providing the necessary protection of the principal. The City seeks to optimize return on investments in all portfolios. The average minimum rate of return for the 2 entire portfolio, excluding funds needed for current obligations, must be at least equal to a no default risk rate of return indicator, such as the return on the three -month Treasury bill. If funds are subject to yield restrictions due to federal arbitrage regulations, those funds are excluded from the yield calculation. The City may only invest in a particular eligible investment if its yields are equal to or greater than the bond equivalent yield on United States Treasury obligations of comparable maturity. The City Council may establish additional appropriate criteria for investment performance measures. Public Trust It will be the objective of the City to act responsibly as custodians of the public trust. Portfolio Management Under this Policy all investments will be made with the intent of pursuing, at the time of purchase, the best rate of return on securities held until maturity, and not with the intent of speculative trading. However, securities may be sold before maturity if market conditions present an opportunity for the City to benefit from this transaction. Investment Strategy The City maintains one commingled portfolio for investment purposes which incorporates the specific use and the unique characteristics of the funds in the portfolio. The investment strategy has as its primary objective assurance that anticipated liabilities are matched and adequate investment liquidity provided. The City shall pursue conservative portfolio management strategy. This may be accomplished by creating a laddered maturity structure with some extension for yield enhancement. The maximum maturity of any security will be three years and the maximum dollar weighted average maturity of one year or less will be calculated using the stated final maturity date of each security. The investment strategy for debt service shall have as its primary objective the timely payment of debt service obligations. Successive debt service dates will be fully funded before any investment extensions are made. . III. INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL City's Investment Officers In accordance with Section 2256.005 of the Act, Investment Officers for the City include the City Manager, Executive Directors, the Finance Director, and the Assistant Finance Director. The Finance Director is the primary manager of City investment portfolios, and shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy, including the following: (1) Summarizing the economic and market analysis; 3 (2) Forecasting available cash for investments; (3) Formulating strategies for asset mix, investment instruments, maturities, and target yields; (4) Monitoring performance against the current investment strategy and evaluating reasons for variances; (5) Reporting portfolios performance for the previous quarter to the City Council; and (6) Revising the investment strategy based on recommendations by the Investment Advisory Committee. Selecting and Processing Investments The Investment Officers review the composition of the current portfolio and determines whether the securities under consideration maintain the portfolio within the guidelines established by this Policy, subchapter A of the Act, and all federal, state, and local statutes, rules or regulations. The Investment Officers approves the wire transfer form authorizing the transfer of funds for a specific investment transaction. Documenting Investments and Providing Details The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers retain documentation of all investment transactions, including any bond swaps. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment provides information and supporting documentation for all investment transactions for entry in the General Ledger. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers. The Finance Director will utilize information and back -up documentation on all investment transactions to ensure accurate calculation of cash position and accurate posting to appropriate accounts. Developing Cash Flow Projections for All Portfolios The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers analyzes prior period data and develops and amends cash flow projections of the City's cash requirements The cash flow projections to match assets and liabilities in order to maximize the return on investments. All funds that can be legally invested and match the available balance identified in the cash flow projections are considered available for investment. Monitoring Investment Performance The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers must routinely perform market and economic analysis to forecast probable market conditions for the investment period by assembling and analyzing current and trend data to develop and plan investment strategy. E This analysis uses information obtained from investment advisors, brokers, and investment industry publications. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers monitor the current and expected yield curves for interest rate movements. When interest rates are expected to decline, maturity ranges are extended within portfolio and the constraints of this Policy. When interest rates are expected to increase, maturity ranges are shortened. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers monitors yield spreads between various government agency issues and United States notes and bonds to determine the best value. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers summarizes economic and market trend information and presents recommendations for investments strategy based on economic and market conditions to the City Council and the Investment Advisory Committee. Reconciling Investment Records and General Ledger The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers prepares a monthly report that includes information such as identifying investments at par value, identifying CUSIP number, disclosing the premium or discount, and the interest purchased for the City's investments. The report includes monthly and year -to -date interest accruals and amortization/accretion of premium/discount. This report should reconcile to the investment accounts in the General Ledger. Allocating Interest Revenue The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers allocates the interest revenue earned from investments proportionately to all accounts that participate in the investment function. Providing Revenue Estimates for All Portfolios The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers provides an estimate of the investment revenue for the annual budget Prudence Investments of the City shall be made with judgment and the exercise of due care, under prevailing circumstances, that a person of prudence, discretion and intelligence would exercise in the management of the person's own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital, as well as the probable income to be derived for the City. Unless authorized by law, a person may not deposit, withdraw, transfer, or manage in any other manner the funds of the City. Business Relationships of City Manager and Investment Officers The City Manager and the Investment Officersmustfile a statement with the City Council and the Texas Ethics Commission of any personal business relationship that they may have with 5 a business organization as defined in the Act offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City. A personal business relationship is defined by Section 2256.005 of the Act to exist if (1) The investment officer owns 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business organization or owns $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business organization; (2) Funds received by the investment officer from the business organization exceed 10% of the investment officer's gross income for the previous year; or (3) The investment officer has acquired from the business organization during the previous year investments with a book value of $2,500 or more for the personal account of the investment officer. Liability of City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers are not responsible for any loss of the City funds through the failure or negligence of a depository bank or other financial or investment institution as described in Article VI of this Policy. IV. INVESTMENT REPORTING Quarterly Report The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers will continually monitor and evaluate the City's investments, and report quarterly to the City Council as provided in Section 2256.023 of the Act. The report must: (1) describe in detail the investment position of the City on the date of the report; (2) be prepared jointly by all investment officers of the City; (3) be signed by each investment officer of the City; (4) contain a summary statement, prepared in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, of each pooled fund group that states the: (a) beginning market value for the reporting period; (b) additions and changes to the market value during the period; (c) ending market value for the period; and (d) fully accrued interest for the reporting period; 0 (5) state the book value and market value of each separately invested asset at the beginning and end of the reporting period by the type of asset and fund type invested; (6) state the maturity date of each separately invested asset that has a maturity date; (7) state the account or fund or pooled group fund in the City for which each individual investment was acquired; and (8) state the compliance of the investment portfolio of the City as it relates to: (a) the investment strategy expressed in the City's investment policy; and (b) relevant provisions of the Act. The report shall be presented not less than quarterly to the City Council and the City Manager of the City within a reasonable time after the end of the period. If the City invests in other than money market mutual funds, investment pools or accounts offered by its depository bank in the form of certificates of deposit, or money market accounts or similar accounts, the reports prepared by the investment officers under this section shall be formally reviewed at least annually by an independent auditor, and the result of the review shall be reported to the City Council by that auditor. Investment Advisory Committee An Investment Advisory Committee composed of the City Manager (as Chair), Executive Directors, the Mayor, Finance Director, Assistant Finance Director, Budget/Financial Analyst, and one member of the City Council will meet no less than once semiannually to review the last two quarterly reports prepared by the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers and review the Investment Objectives, Investment Responsibility and Control, and Investment Instruments as established by this Policy and the Act. Annual Review This Policy and investment strategy will be reviewed by City Council annually. The City Council shall adopt a written rule, order, ordinance, or resolution stating that it has reviewed the Policy and investment strategy and shall record in the order, ordinance or resolution any changes made to either the Policy or investment strategy. Investment Training The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers are required to receive 10 hours training pertaining to the Texas Public Funds Investment Act within the first 12 months after assuming duties and 8 hours every 2 years thereafter. This training shall be through courses and seminars offered by professional organizations and associations in order to ensure the quality 7 and capability of the Investment Officers and staff in making investment decisions. Training for city council officials on the Investment Committee is recommended to provide education and knowledge pertaining to the Public Funds Investment Act but the training is not mandatory. Notification of Investment Changes or Defaults It shall be the duty of the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers to notify the City Council of any significant changes in current investment methods and procedures prior to their implementation and to immediately notify the City Council in the event of a default or nonpayment of any investment acquired with City funds. In addition, the City Council in its annual review of the Policy shall adopt any order, ordinance, or resolution establishing its annual review and record any changes to the Policy or investment strategies. Compliance Audit The City, in conjunction with its annual financial audit, shall perform a compliance audit of management controls on investments and adherence to the Policy. V. INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS Authorized Investment Instruments The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers shall use any or all of the following authorized investment instruments consistent with governing law: (1) Obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; (2) Collateralized mortgage obligations directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality of the United States, the underlying security for which is guaranteed by an agency of instrumentality of the United States; (3) General Obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any state having been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and having received a rating of not less than A or its equivalent; (6) Certificates of deposit issued by a state or national bank domiciled in this State, a savings bank domiciled in this state or federal credit union domiciled in this State that are (A) Guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund or its successor; or (B) Secured by obligations that are described by subdivisions (1) -(6) of this subsection, including mortgage- backed securities directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality that have a market value of not less than the principal amount of the certificates or in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; or (C) Secured in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; (7) Prime domestic bankers' acceptances if it (A) Has stated maturity of 270 days or fewer from the date of its issuance; (B) Will be, in accordance with its terms, liquidated in full at maturity; (C) Is eligible for collateral for borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank; and (D) Is accepted by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state, if the short-term obligations of the bank, or of a bank holding company of which the bank is the largest subsidiary, are rated not less than A -1 or P -1 or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency; (8) Commercial paper if it (A) Has a stated maturity of 270 days or less from the date of its issuance; and (B) Is rated not less than A -1, P -1, or the equivalent by at least (1) Two nationally recognized credit rating agencies; or (2) One nationally recognized credit rating agency and is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, (C) For commercial paper with maturity of over 90 days, monthly credit checks will be conducted on the issuer to determine risk and to take appropriate steps to protect the investment I (9) Fully collateralized direct repurchase agreements having a defined termination date, secured by obligations described by subdivision (1) of this subsection, pledged to the City, held in the City's name, and deposited at the time the investment is made with a third party selected and approved by the City, and placed through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a financial institution doing business in this State; (11) Bond proceeds, other than bond proceeds representing reserves and funds maintained for debt service purposes, may not be invested under the Act in a guaranteed investment contract with a term of longer than five years from date of issuance of the bonds; to be eligible as an authorized investment (A) The City Council must specifically authorize guaranteed investment contracts as an eligible investment in the ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds; (B) The City must receive bids from at least three separate providers with no material financial interest in the bonds from which proceeds were received; (C) The City must purchase the highest yielding guaranteed investment contract for which a qualifying bid is received; (D) The price of the guaranteed investment contract must take into account the reasonably expected drawdown schedule for the bond proceeds to be invested; and (E) The provider must certify the administrative costs reasonably expected to be paid to third parties in connection with the guaranteed investment contract. In addition to the investments described by items (1) - (11) above, the City may invest funds under its control in eligible public funds investment pools as permitted under the Act. A public funds investment pool must be continuously rated no lower than AAA or AAA -m or at an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized rating service or no lower than investment grade by at least one nationally recognized rating service with a weighted average maturity no greater than 90 days. In addition to the investments described by items (1) - (11) above, the City may, in accordance with the Act, purchase, sell, and invest funds, after receiving a prospectus and other information required by the SEC, under its control in an SEC - regulated, no -load money market mutual fund with a dollar- weighted average stated maturity of 90 days or less and whose investment objectives include seeking to maintain a stable net asset value of $1 per share or a no- 10 load mutual fund which is registered with the SEC, has an average weighted maturity of less than two years, is invested exclusively in obligations approved by the Act, is continuously rated as investment quality by at least one nationally recognized investment rating firm of not less than AAA or its equivalent and conforms to the requirements set forth in Sections 2256.016(b) and (c) of the Act relating to the eligibility of investment pools to receive and invest funds of the City. The City shall not (i) invest in the aggregate more than 15% of its monthly average fund balance, excluding bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service in mutual funds as described by the Act; (ii) invest any portion of bond proceeds, reserves and funds held for debt service, in mutual finds described by the Act; or (iii) invest its funds or funds under its control, including bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service in any one mutual fund described by the Act in an amount that exceeds 10% of the total assets of the mutual fund. VI. INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS Selection of Bank and Securities Dealers All financial institutions and broker /dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must be given a copy of the Policy and must supply the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers with the information specified below. First, a broker /dealer must submit audited financial statements for the financial institution or broker /dealer. Second, a broker /dealer must provide evidence of appropriate registration by the qualified representative of the business organization as such terms are defined in the Act. For bank dealers, this requires a statement from a senior bank official that the bank dealer is appropriately registered with its primary regulatory agency (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for National Banks) as a government securities dealer, municipal securities dealer, or both. For a securities firm, this requires a statement from a senior official that the firm is registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers. Finally, a broker /dealer must deliver a written statement, acceptable to the City, by the qualified representative, offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City, that they have received and thoroughly reviewed the Policy and acknowledged that the business organization has implemented reasonable procedures and controls in an effort to preclude investment transactions conducted between the City and the business organization that are not authorized by this Policy or the Public Funds Investment Act. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers will recommend both primary and secondary securities dealers to the City Council for final approval. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers may not acquire or otherwise obtain any authorized investment described in this Policy from a person who has not delivered to the City the written statement required in this section. The City Council or the designated Investment Advisory Committee members shall, at least annually, review, revise, and adopt a list of qualified brokers that are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City. VII. INVESTMENT COLLATERAL AND SAFEKEEPING 11 Collateral or Insurance for Deposits The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers shall ensure that all deposited and invested City funds are, to the extent required, fully collateralized or insured consistent with federal and state law and the current bank depository contract in one or more of the following manners: (1) FDIC insurance coverage; (2) Obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; (3) Direct obligations of the State of Texas or its agencies; (4) Other obligations, the principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the State of Texas or the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; or (5) Any other manner allowed by law. Safekeeping All purchased securities shall be held in safekeeping by the City, or a City account in a third party financial institution, or with a Federal Reserve Bank. All certificates of deposit, insured by FDIC, purchased outside the depository bank shall be held in safekeeping by either the City or a City account in a third party financial institution. All pledged securities by the depository bank shall be held in safekeeping by the City, or a City account in a third parry financial institution, or with a Federal Reserve Bank. All certificates of deposit, pledged by the depository bank shall be held in custody of a Federal Reserve Bank for safekeeping, be the subject of a valid pledge agreement designating the City as the beneficiary of the pledge agreement; be insured by the FDIC; be described in detail by a safekeeping receipt issued to the City by the Federal Reserve Bank having custody of the certificates; and be issued with the City as registered owner. Delivery vs. Payment It will be the policy of the City that all transactions, except investment pool funds and mutual funds, shall be purchased using the delivery vs. payment method through the Federal Reserve System. By so doing, City funds are not released until the City has received, through the Federal Reserve wire, the securities purchased. 12 Agenda No. 8 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 28, 2017 Department: Finance Subject: Resolution 17 -R -13 — A resolution by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas designating investment officers, and other matters in connection therewith BACKGROUND In a review of the Texas Government Code Sec. 2256.005, part of the Public Funds Investment Act by the new Finance Director, it was brought to light that the City Council needs to designate investment officers for the City. These individuals will be responsible for the investment of City funds. The Public Funds Investment Act, the Investment Policy & Strategy, and the investment committee will guide the officers in their investment decisions. The Public Funds Investment Act and the council approved Investment Policy & Strategy limit the types of investments the City can use. Their purpose is to ensure city funds are kept safe and can easily be returned in the event of an emergency. The resolution designates City Manager John Kessel; Executive Directors Brian James, Dudley Wait, and Kyle Kinateder; and Finance Director James Walters as Investment Officers for the City of Schertz. These designations are in compliance with what is required in the City's Investment Policy & Strategy document approved December 20, 2016. This designation does not need to be renewed each year. If the investment officers need to be changed due a reorganization or employee status change, council will be asked to designate the new employees and remove the designation of the old employees. To review the Public Funds Investment Act please use the following link: http://www.statutes.legis.state.tx.us/Docs/GV/htm/GV.2256.htm FISCAL IMPACT None. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution 17 -R -13 designating investment officers for the City of Schertz in compliance with the Public Funds Investment Act and the City's Investment Policy and Strategy. City Council Memorandum Page 2 ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -R -13 City of Schertz Investment Policy & Strategy RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -13 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS DESIGNATING INVESTMENT OFFICERS, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Texas Government Code Sec. 2256.005, part of the Public Funds Investment Act, requires City Council to designate investment officers for the City; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City designate the City Manager John Kessel; Executive Directors Brian James, Dudley Wait, and Kyle Kinateder; and Finance Director James Walters as Investment Officers; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to designate these individuals as investment officers. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby designates the City Manager John Kessel, Executive Directors Brian James, Dudley Wait, and Kyle Kinateder, and Finance Director James Walters as Investment Officers of the City of Schertz invest city funds in compliance to the City Investment Policy and Strategy and the Public Funds Investment Act. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. 50234811.1 A- I Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL 50234811.1 A -2 CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS INVESTMENT POLICY AND STRATEGY TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INVESTMENT SCOPE ............................................................................ ............................... 1 GeneralStatement ............................................................................. ............................... 1 FundsIncluded ................................................................................... ............................... 1 FundsExcluded .................................................................................. ............................... 1 II. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES .............................................................. ............................... 1 GeneralStatement ............................................................................. ............................... 1 Safety................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Liquidity.............................................................................................. ............................... 2 Diversification.................................................................................... ............................... 2 Yield.................................................................................................... ............................... 2 Maturity .................... ............................... .........................Error! Bookmark not defined. PublicTrust ........................................................................................ ............................... 3 PortfolioManagement ....................................................................... ............................... 3 InvestmentStrategy ........................................................................... ............................... 3 III. INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL ..................... ............................... 3 City's Investment Delegate ................................................................ ............................... 3 Selecting And Processing Investments ............................................. ............................... 4 Documenting Investments And Providing Details .......................... ............................... 4 Developing Cash Flow Projections For All Portfolios .................... ............................... 4 Determining Cash Available For Investment ................Error! Bookmark not defined. Monitoring Investment Performance ............................................... ............................... 4 Reconciling Investment Records And General Ledger .................. ............................... 5 Allocating Interest Revenue .............................................................. ............................... 5 Providing Revenue Estimates For All Portfolios ............................ ............................... 5 Prudence............................................................................................. ............................... 5 Business Relationships of City Manager and Investment Officers .............................. 5 Liability of City Manager and Investment Officers ....................... ............................... 6 IV. INVESTMENT REPORTING .............................................................. ............................... 6 QuarterlyReport ............................................................................... ............................... 6 Investment Advisory Committee ...................................................... ............................... 7 AnnualReview ................................................................................... ............................... 8 InvestmentTraining .......................................................................... ............................... 8 Notification of Investment Changes or Defaults ............................. ............................... 9 ComplianceAudit .............................................................................. ............................... 9 V. INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS .......................................................... ............................... 8 Authorized Investment Instruments ................................................ ............................... 8 VI. INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS ........................................................ ............................... 11 -i- Investment Institutions Defined ...................................... Error! Bookmark not defined. Selection wfBank And SeouritiemDealeno ----------------------- ll VII. COLLATERAL AND SAFEKEEPING ............................................... ll Collateral or Insurance For Deposits ............................................................................ l2 Safekeeping _____-------------------------------.---l2 Delivery vs. ----.-----------------------------..l2 I. INVESTMENT SCOPE General Statement This policy (this "Policy ") serves to satisfy the statutory requirement of the Public Funds Investment Act, as amended, Texas Government Code Chapter 2256, as amended (the "Act "), to define and adopt a formal written investment policy for the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City "). The City shall be authorized to invest its funds pursuant to the provisions of the Act and this Policy or, upon obtaining the prior approval of the City Council of the City (the "City Council "), any other applicable law. Funds Included This Policy applies to all City funds under the direct control of the City, at the present time any funds to be received in the future and any other funds held in custody by the City, unless expressly prohibited by law or unless it is in contravention of any depository contract between the City and any depository bank. The City funds that are entrusted to the City Council for investment pursuant to this Policy are divided into the following portfolios based on the source of funds: The operating account portfolio that consists of funds from the general fund and all other miscellaneous funds. The agency funds portfolio, which consists of all agency funds. Special Revenue, Special Assessment, and all other City funds. Funds Excluded This Policy shall not be applicable to any funds on deposit in any bond account, reserve account, or capital improvement construction account. The provisions of the ordinances authorizing the issuance of these debt obligations and the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended control the investment of funds on deposit in these accounts. II. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES General Statement Funds of the City will be invested in accordance with the Act, this Policy, written investment strategy, and written administrative procedures to be developed by the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers. The City's investment portfolio shall be managed in a manner to attain the maximum rate of return allowed through prudent and legal investing of City funds while preserving and protecting capital in the overall portfolio. 1 Safety The primary objective of the City for all portfolios and funds is to ensure the safety of the principal. All investment transactions shall first seek to avoid capital losses. = The City's investment portfolio must be structured in a manner that will provide the liquidity necessary to meet all operating requirements which might reasonably be anticipated, and to pay obligations as they become due. Diversification The policy of the City, except when investing with the City's depository bank or in U.S. Treasury Bills, Bonds or Notes, will be to diversify its investment portfolio when investing in certificates of deposit of other banks and savings and loans domiciled in Texas, repurchase agreements, U.S. agencies securities, and other investment instruments provided for by law. The City's portfolio shall be diversified to eliminate the risk of loss resulting from over concentration of assets in a specific maturity, a specific issuer or a specific class of investments. Investments of the City shall always be selected to provide stability of income and reasonable liquidity. Liquidity is defined as the ability to sell an investment at reasonable cost under adverse market conditions. In establishing specific diversification strategies, the following general polices and constraints shall apply: (1) Portfolio maturities shall be staggered in a way that avoids undue concentration of assets in a specific maturity sector. Maturities shall be selected which provide for stability of income and reasonable liquidity. (2) Liquidity shall be maintained through practices that ensure that the next disbursement date and payroll date are covered through current revenues, maturing investments, or marketable securities. (3) Risks of market price volatility shall be controlled through maturity diversification. Yield It is the objective of the City to earn the maximum rate of return allowed on its investments within the constraints imposed by its safety and liquidity objectives, and the applicable law governing the investment of public funds. The City must invest its portfolios in eligible investments that yield the highest possible rate of return while providing the necessary protection of the principal. The City seeks to optimize return on investments in all portfolios. The average minimum rate of return for the 2 entire portfolio, excluding funds needed for current obligations, must be at least equal to a no default risk rate of return indicator, such as the return on the three -month Treasury bill. If funds are subject to yield restrictions due to federal arbitrage regulations, those funds are excluded from the yield calculation. The City may only invest in a particular eligible investment if its yields are equal to or greater than the bond equivalent yield on United States Treasury obligations of comparable maturity. The City Council may establish additional appropriate criteria for investment performance measures. Public Trust It will be the objective of the City to act responsibly as custodians of the public trust. Portfolio Management Under this Policy all investments will be made with the intent of pursuing, at the time of purchase, the best rate of return on securities held until maturity, and not with the intent of speculative trading. However, securities may be sold before maturity if market conditions present an opportunity for the City to benefit from this transaction. Investment Strategy The City maintains one commingled portfolio for investment purposes which incorporates the specific use and the unique characteristics of the funds in the portfolio. The investment strategy has as its primary objective assurance that anticipated liabilities are matched and adequate investment liquidity provided. The City shall pursue conservative portfolio management strategy. This may be accomplished by creating a laddered maturity structure with some extension for yield enhancement. The maximum maturity of any security will be three years and the maximum dollar weighted average maturity of one year or less will be calculated using the stated final maturity date of each security. The investment strategy for debt service shall have as its primary objective the timely payment of debt service obligations. Successive debt service dates will be fully funded before any investment extensions are made. . III. INVESTMENT RESPONSIBILITY AND CONTROL City's Investment Officers In accordance with Section 2256.005 of the Act, Investment Officers for the City include the City Manager, Executive Directors, the Finance Director, and the Assistant Finance Director. The Finance Director is the primary manager of City investment portfolios, and shall develop and maintain written administrative procedures for the operation of the investment program, consistent with this Policy, including the following: (1) Summarizing the economic and market analysis; 3 (2) Forecasting available cash for investments; (3) Formulating strategies for asset mix, investment instruments, maturities, and target yields; (4) Monitoring performance against the current investment strategy and evaluating reasons for variances; (5) Reporting portfolios performance for the previous quarter to the City Council; and (6) Revising the investment strategy based on recommendations by the Investment Advisory Committee. Selecting and Processing Investments The Investment Officers review the composition of the current portfolio and determines whether the securities under consideration maintain the portfolio within the guidelines established by this Policy, subchapter A of the Act, and all federal, state, and local statutes, rules or regulations. The Investment Officers approves the wire transfer form authorizing the transfer of funds for a specific investment transaction. Documenting Investments and Providing Details The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers retain documentation of all investment transactions, including any bond swaps. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment provides information and supporting documentation for all investment transactions for entry in the General Ledger. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers. The Finance Director will utilize information and back -up documentation on all investment transactions to ensure accurate calculation of cash position and accurate posting to appropriate accounts. Developing Cash Flow Projections for All Portfolios The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers analyzes prior period data and develops and amends cash flow projections of the City's cash requirements The cash flow projections to match assets and liabilities in order to maximize the return on investments. All funds that can be legally invested and match the available balance identified in the cash flow projections are considered available for investment. Monitoring Investment Performance The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers must routinely perform market and economic analysis to forecast probable market conditions for the investment period by assembling and analyzing current and trend data to develop and plan investment strategy. E This analysis uses information obtained from investment advisors, brokers, and investment industry publications. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers monitor the current and expected yield curves for interest rate movements. When interest rates are expected to decline, maturity ranges are extended within portfolio and the constraints of this Policy. When interest rates are expected to increase, maturity ranges are shortened. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers monitors yield spreads between various government agency issues and United States notes and bonds to determine the best value. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers summarizes economic and market trend information and presents recommendations for investments strategy based on economic and market conditions to the City Council and the Investment Advisory Committee. Reconciling Investment Records and General Ledger The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers prepares a monthly report that includes information such as identifying investments at par value, identifying CUSIP number, disclosing the premium or discount, and the interest purchased for the City's investments. The report includes monthly and year -to -date interest accruals and amortization/accretion of premium/discount. This report should reconcile to the investment accounts in the General Ledger. Allocating Interest Revenue The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers allocates the interest revenue earned from investments proportionately to all accounts that participate in the investment function. Providing Revenue Estimates for All Portfolios The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers provides an estimate of the investment revenue for the annual budget Prudence Investments of the City shall be made with judgment and the exercise of due care, under prevailing circumstances, that a person of prudence, discretion and intelligence would exercise in the management of the person's own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety of capital, as well as the probable income to be derived for the City. Unless authorized by law, a person may not deposit, withdraw, transfer, or manage in any other manner the funds of the City. Business Relationships of City Manager and Investment Officers The City Manager and the Investment Officersmustfile a statement with the City Council and the Texas Ethics Commission of any personal business relationship that they may have with 5 a business organization as defined in the Act offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City. A personal business relationship is defined by Section 2256.005 of the Act to exist if (1) The investment officer owns 10% or more of the voting stock or shares of the business organization or owns $5,000 or more of the fair market value of the business organization; (2) Funds received by the investment officer from the business organization exceed 10% of the investment officer's gross income for the previous year; or (3) The investment officer has acquired from the business organization during the previous year investments with a book value of $2,500 or more for the personal account of the investment officer. Liability of City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers are not responsible for any loss of the City funds through the failure or negligence of a depository bank or other financial or investment institution as described in Article VI of this Policy. IV. INVESTMENT REPORTING Quarterly Report The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers will continually monitor and evaluate the City's investments, and report quarterly to the City Council as provided in Section 2256.023 of the Act. The report must: (1) describe in detail the investment position of the City on the date of the report; (2) be prepared jointly by all investment officers of the City; (3) be signed by each investment officer of the City; (4) contain a summary statement, prepared in compliance with generally accepted accounting principles, of each pooled fund group that states the: (a) beginning market value for the reporting period; (b) additions and changes to the market value during the period; (c) ending market value for the period; and (d) fully accrued interest for the reporting period; 0 (5) state the book value and market value of each separately invested asset at the beginning and end of the reporting period by the type of asset and fund type invested; (6) state the maturity date of each separately invested asset that has a maturity date; (7) state the account or fund or pooled group fund in the City for which each individual investment was acquired; and (8) state the compliance of the investment portfolio of the City as it relates to: (a) the investment strategy expressed in the City's investment policy; and (b) relevant provisions of the Act. The report shall be presented not less than quarterly to the City Council and the City Manager of the City within a reasonable time after the end of the period. If the City invests in other than money market mutual funds, investment pools or accounts offered by its depository bank in the form of certificates of deposit, or money market accounts or similar accounts, the reports prepared by the investment officers under this section shall be formally reviewed at least annually by an independent auditor, and the result of the review shall be reported to the City Council by that auditor. Investment Advisory Committee An Investment Advisory Committee composed of the City Manager (as Chair), Executive Directors, the Mayor, Finance Director, Assistant Finance Director, Budget/Financial Analyst, and one member of the City Council will meet no less than once semiannually to review the last two quarterly reports prepared by the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers and review the Investment Objectives, Investment Responsibility and Control, and Investment Instruments as established by this Policy and the Act. Annual Review This Policy and investment strategy will be reviewed by City Council annually. The City Council shall adopt a written rule, order, ordinance, or resolution stating that it has reviewed the Policy and investment strategy and shall record in the order, ordinance or resolution any changes made to either the Policy or investment strategy. Investment Training The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers are required to receive 10 hours training pertaining to the Texas Public Funds Investment Act within the first 12 months after assuming duties and 8 hours every 2 years thereafter. This training shall be through courses and seminars offered by professional organizations and associations in order to ensure the quality 7 and capability of the Investment Officers and staff in making investment decisions. Training for city council officials on the Investment Committee is recommended to provide education and knowledge pertaining to the Public Funds Investment Act but the training is not mandatory. Notification of Investment Changes or Defaults It shall be the duty of the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers to notify the City Council of any significant changes in current investment methods and procedures prior to their implementation and to immediately notify the City Council in the event of a default or nonpayment of any investment acquired with City funds. In addition, the City Council in its annual review of the Policy shall adopt any order, ordinance, or resolution establishing its annual review and record any changes to the Policy or investment strategies. Compliance Audit The City, in conjunction with its annual financial audit, shall perform a compliance audit of management controls on investments and adherence to the Policy. V. INVESTMENT INSTRUMENTS Authorized Investment Instruments The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers shall use any or all of the following authorized investment instruments consistent with governing law: (1) Obligations, including letters of credit, of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; (2) Collateralized mortgage obligations directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality of the United States, the underlying security for which is guaranteed by an agency of instrumentality of the United States; (3) General Obligations of states, agencies, counties, cities, and other political subdivisions of any state having been rated as to investment quality by a nationally recognized investment rating firm and having received a rating of not less than A or its equivalent; (6) Certificates of deposit issued by a state or national bank domiciled in this State, a savings bank domiciled in this state or federal credit union domiciled in this State that are (A) Guaranteed or insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation or its successor or the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund or its successor; or (B) Secured by obligations that are described by subdivisions (1) -(6) of this subsection, including mortgage- backed securities directly issued by a federal agency or instrumentality that have a market value of not less than the principal amount of the certificates or in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; or (C) Secured in any other manner and amount provided by law for deposits of the City; (7) Prime domestic bankers' acceptances if it (A) Has stated maturity of 270 days or fewer from the date of its issuance; (B) Will be, in accordance with its terms, liquidated in full at maturity; (C) Is eligible for collateral for borrowing from a Federal Reserve Bank; and (D) Is accepted by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state, if the short-term obligations of the bank, or of a bank holding company of which the bank is the largest subsidiary, are rated not less than A -1 or P -1 or an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized credit rating agency; (8) Commercial paper if it (A) Has a stated maturity of 270 days or less from the date of its issuance; and (B) Is rated not less than A -1, P -1, or the equivalent by at least (1) Two nationally recognized credit rating agencies; or (2) One nationally recognized credit rating agency and is fully secured by an irrevocable letter of credit issued by a bank organized and existing under the laws of the United States or any state thereof, (C) For commercial paper with maturity of over 90 days, monthly credit checks will be conducted on the issuer to determine risk and to take appropriate steps to protect the investment I (9) Fully collateralized direct repurchase agreements having a defined termination date, secured by obligations described by subdivision (1) of this subsection, pledged to the City, held in the City's name, and deposited at the time the investment is made with a third party selected and approved by the City, and placed through a primary government securities dealer, as defined by the Federal Reserve, or a financial institution doing business in this State; (11) Bond proceeds, other than bond proceeds representing reserves and funds maintained for debt service purposes, may not be invested under the Act in a guaranteed investment contract with a term of longer than five years from date of issuance of the bonds; to be eligible as an authorized investment (A) The City Council must specifically authorize guaranteed investment contracts as an eligible investment in the ordinance or resolution authorizing the issuance of bonds; (B) The City must receive bids from at least three separate providers with no material financial interest in the bonds from which proceeds were received; (C) The City must purchase the highest yielding guaranteed investment contract for which a qualifying bid is received; (D) The price of the guaranteed investment contract must take into account the reasonably expected drawdown schedule for the bond proceeds to be invested; and (E) The provider must certify the administrative costs reasonably expected to be paid to third parties in connection with the guaranteed investment contract. In addition to the investments described by items (1) - (11) above, the City may invest funds under its control in eligible public funds investment pools as permitted under the Act. A public funds investment pool must be continuously rated no lower than AAA or AAA -m or at an equivalent rating by at least one nationally recognized rating service or no lower than investment grade by at least one nationally recognized rating service with a weighted average maturity no greater than 90 days. In addition to the investments described by items (1) - (11) above, the City may, in accordance with the Act, purchase, sell, and invest funds, after receiving a prospectus and other information required by the SEC, under its control in an SEC - regulated, no -load money market mutual fund with a dollar- weighted average stated maturity of 90 days or less and whose investment objectives include seeking to maintain a stable net asset value of $1 per share or a no- 10 load mutual fund which is registered with the SEC, has an average weighted maturity of less than two years, is invested exclusively in obligations approved by the Act, is continuously rated as investment quality by at least one nationally recognized investment rating firm of not less than AAA or its equivalent and conforms to the requirements set forth in Sections 2256.016(b) and (c) of the Act relating to the eligibility of investment pools to receive and invest funds of the City. The City shall not (i) invest in the aggregate more than 15% of its monthly average fund balance, excluding bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service in mutual funds as described by the Act; (ii) invest any portion of bond proceeds, reserves and funds held for debt service, in mutual finds described by the Act; or (iii) invest its funds or funds under its control, including bond proceeds and reserves and other funds held for debt service in any one mutual fund described by the Act in an amount that exceeds 10% of the total assets of the mutual fund. VI. INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS Selection of Bank and Securities Dealers All financial institutions and broker /dealers who desire to become qualified bidders for investment transactions must be given a copy of the Policy and must supply the City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers with the information specified below. First, a broker /dealer must submit audited financial statements for the financial institution or broker /dealer. Second, a broker /dealer must provide evidence of appropriate registration by the qualified representative of the business organization as such terms are defined in the Act. For bank dealers, this requires a statement from a senior bank official that the bank dealer is appropriately registered with its primary regulatory agency (the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency for National Banks) as a government securities dealer, municipal securities dealer, or both. For a securities firm, this requires a statement from a senior official that the firm is registered with the National Association of Securities Dealers. Finally, a broker /dealer must deliver a written statement, acceptable to the City, by the qualified representative, offering to engage in an investment transaction with the City, that they have received and thoroughly reviewed the Policy and acknowledged that the business organization has implemented reasonable procedures and controls in an effort to preclude investment transactions conducted between the City and the business organization that are not authorized by this Policy or the Public Funds Investment Act. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers will recommend both primary and secondary securities dealers to the City Council for final approval. The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers may not acquire or otherwise obtain any authorized investment described in this Policy from a person who has not delivered to the City the written statement required in this section. The City Council or the designated Investment Advisory Committee members shall, at least annually, review, revise, and adopt a list of qualified brokers that are authorized to engage in investment transactions with the City. VII. INVESTMENT COLLATERAL AND SAFEKEEPING 11 Collateral or Insurance for Deposits The City Manager, Finance Director, and Investment Officers shall ensure that all deposited and invested City funds are, to the extent required, fully collateralized or insured consistent with federal and state law and the current bank depository contract in one or more of the following manners: (1) FDIC insurance coverage; (2) Obligations of the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; (3) Direct obligations of the State of Texas or its agencies; (4) Other obligations, the principal of and interest on which are unconditionally guaranteed or insured by the State of Texas or the United States or its agencies and instrumentalities; or (5) Any other manner allowed by law. Safekeeping All purchased securities shall be held in safekeeping by the City, or a City account in a third party financial institution, or with a Federal Reserve Bank. All certificates of deposit, insured by FDIC, purchased outside the depository bank shall be held in safekeeping by either the City or a City account in a third party financial institution. All pledged securities by the depository bank shall be held in safekeeping by the City, or a City account in a third parry financial institution, or with a Federal Reserve Bank. All certificates of deposit, pledged by the depository bank shall be held in custody of a Federal Reserve Bank for safekeeping, be the subject of a valid pledge agreement designating the City as the beneficiary of the pledge agreement; be insured by the FDIC; be described in detail by a safekeeping receipt issued to the City by the Federal Reserve Bank having custody of the certificates; and be issued with the City as registered owner. Delivery vs. Payment It will be the policy of the City that all transactions, except investment pool funds and mutual funds, shall be purchased using the delivery vs. payment method through the Federal Reserve System. By so doing, City funds are not released until the City has received, through the Federal Reserve wire, the securities purchased. 12 Agenda No. 9 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 23, 2017 Department: Development Services Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -14 - Consideration and/or action approving the semiannual reports with respect to the progress of the Capital Improvements Plan, and other matters in connection therewith. (B. James /J. Walters) BACKGROUND Section 395.058 (c) (4) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to file semi - annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implement the plan or imposing impact fees. Section 90 -158 of the City's Code of Ordinance includes this same requirement. The CIAC is a citizen group made up of our current Planning and Zoning Commission, a real estate -type representative and a resident in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, all of whom are appointed by the City Council. Impact fees can only be charged to new development and used in compliance with a specific adopted plan. Projects in the plan must be designed to increase the capacity of our water and sewer unfractured to accommodate our growth. General maintenance or replacing old pipes would not be acceptable uses of these funds. The attached report includes capital recovery balance reports for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 and from April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 and the draft CIAC minutes from January 11, 2017. $3 million is allocated as part of the Corbett elevated tank and associated line project and the waterline for the new sewer treatment plant. Due to changes in personnel the report to the committee and to the council was delayed. This action tonight will approve the previous 2 reports. Going forward, the report submissions will be done on a semi - annual basis. Goal To accept the Semi - annual Reports on the revenue and expenditures relating to the water and wastewater impact fees as filed by the City of Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC). Community Benefit To ensure compliance with State Law and the City's Code of Ordinances and to ensure that impact fees are being collected and spent in appropriately. Summary of Recommended Action Approve the resolution accepting the semi - annual reports as made up of the draft minutes for the January 11, 2017 CIAC meeting and the Capital Recovery Balance Reports. FISCAL IMPACT The report indicates the amounts collected in water and sewer impact fees. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 17 -R -14 accepting the Semi - annual Reports as filed by the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee. ATTACHMENT(S) Resolution 17 -R -14 Exhibit A: Draft Minutes for the January 11, 2017 Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Meeting Exhibit B: Capital Recovery Balance Report for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 Exhibit C: Capital Recovery Balance Report for April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 Capital Improvements Program RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -14 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ACCEPTINING THE SEMIANNUAL REPORTS WITH RESPECT TO THE PROGRESS OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee has reviewed the revenue and expenditures relating to the established Capital Recovery Fees in accordance with the Capital Improvements Plan for the City of Schertz; and WHEREAS, the City Council accepts the Semiannual Reports as filed by the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395; then BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the draft minutes of the January 11, 2017 City of Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee as shown in the attached Exhibit A, and the Capital Recovery Balance Reports with respect to the progress of the Capital Improvements Plan for the City of Schertz, Texas for the periods of October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 as shown in the attached Exhibit B and of April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 as shown in the attached Exhibit C . Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of February, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C Special Joint Meeting of the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Minutes January 11, 2017 The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee convened a Special Joint Meeting on Wednesday, January 11, 2017 at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Bldg. 4 Schertz, Texas. Members Present: David Richmond Ernie Evans Richard Braud Christian Glombik Michael Dahle Glen Outlaw Dr. Mark Penshorn Staff Present: Members Absent: Tim Brown Ken Greenwald Brian James, Executive Director of Development Lesa Wood, Director of Planning and Community Development Bryce Cox, Senior Planner Emily Grobe, Planner I Channary Gould, Planner I Tiffany Danhof, Executive Assistant Development James Walters, Director of Finance Daniel Santee, City Attorney 1. Call to order by each governing body. hhl� Mr. Richmond called the CIAC joint meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. 2. Recognition of Newly Appointed Committee Members Mr. Richmond recognized Mr. Glen Outlaw as a new appointed committee member. Mr. Richmond welcomed Mr. Outlaw and commented that he was a long time Schertz resident and formerly with the Schertz Fire Department. 3. Hold a public hearing, Consider and file the semi - annual report for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, evaluating the progress of the city on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. James Walters, Director of Finance, presented the semi - annual report for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, evaluating the capital improvements program and any problems in implementing plans or administering the capital recovery fees. Mr. Richmond opened the Public Hearing at 6:03 P.M. No one spoke during the public hearing, Mr. Richmond closed the public hearing at 6:04 p.m. Mr. Braud moved to approve item 3A. Mr. Dahle seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. 4. Hold a public hearing, consider and file the semi - annual report for April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016, evaluating the progress of the city on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. James Walters, Director of Finance, presented the semi - annual report for April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016, evaluating the progress of the capital improvements program and identifying problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. Mr. Richmond opened the Public Hearing at 6:09 P.M. No one spoke during the public hearing, Mr. Richmond closed the public hearing at 6:10 p.m. Mr. Braud asked if there are minutes taken for the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meetings, and asked who approves the minutes. Mrs. Wood responded that minutes or the meeting are taken and are approved by City Council with the semi - annual report. Mr. Braud asked if Mr. Braud commented that he was having difficulty finding the previous meeting minutes online and there was not a web link on the City's website. Mr. James replied that staff would get the website updated and then let the committee know when it was complete. Mr. Braud asked about when the next impact fee update was going to be performed? Mr. James explained that Staff is working on finishing up the Master Thoroughfare Plan update and changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan based on the JLUS document. After these are finished, staff will begin work on updating the Water and Sewer Masterplan. There was additional discussion relating to impact fee rate structure and plan updates. Mr. Dahle moved to approve item 3B. Mr. Glombik seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. 5. Adjournment. Mr. Richmond adjourned the CIAC joint meeting at 6:20 P.M. Accepted by City Council Date "EXHIBIT B" CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2015 TO MARCH 31, 2016 Oct 1, 2015 to Mar 31, 2016 Beginning Impact Fee Balance Revenues: Expenses: Impact Fees 1 Interest Earned 2 Investments Income 3 Capital One - Investment Income 4 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 5 Transferred Out s Total Revenue Over /(Under) Expense Ending Impact Fee Balance * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IMPACTS FEES * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Water Sewer Total 5,930,600.06 4,433,400.33 10,364,000.39 462,105.00 230,001.36 692,106.36 316.80 206.36 523.16 8,249.26 3,631.97 11,881.23 0.00 10, 954.73 10, 954.73 0.00 2,160.03 2,160.03 366,594.84 0.00 366,594.84 104,076.22 242,634.39 346,710.61 6,034,676.28 4,676,034.72 10,710,711.00 Impact Fees collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 2 Bank Interest collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016. Based on ending bank cash balance. 3 Investment Income collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 Water and Sewer have separate investment accounts. 4 Investment Income from the Capital One investment for Sewer recorded between Oct, 1 2015 through Mar 31, 2016. 5 Investment Mgt Fee charged for the Capital One Investment between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 6 Transferred revenue to Fund 406 Water /Sewer Projects Fund. (To fund the East Live Oak Water Plant Upgrades) 12 -20 -2016 12:15 PM 421 - CAPITAL RECOVERY - SEWER ACCT# ACCOUNT NAME C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z TRIAL BALANCE AS OF: MARCH 31ST, 2016 * ** MONTH TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS ASSETS 000 - 110000 Claim on Cash Cap Recov Sewer 33,782.87 000 - 116200.204 Inv L Star - Capital Rec Sewer 992.08 000 - 116200.403 Inv Acct Sewer - Capital One 3,839.47 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 000 - 340000 Retained Earnings 0.00 REVENUES 000 - 455910 Cap Rcvey -Waste Water 000 - 455913 Cap Rcvey -North Sewer Treat 000 - 491000 Interest Earned 000 - 491200 Investment Income 000 - 491800 Gain /Loss Capital One Sewer 000 - 491900 Unrealize Gain /Loss -Captl One EXPENDITURES 101- 541650 Investment Mgt Fee -Sewer 361.46 * ** TOTALS * ** * ** END OF REPORT * ** 28,356.00 5,400.00 26.87 3,969.26 209.96 1,013.79 38,975.88 38,975.88 PAGE: 1 * ** YEAR TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 569,972.35 2,357,777.43 1,748,284.96 4,433,400.33 210,201.36 19,800.00 206.37 22,937.41 29,620.02 21,269.32 2,160.03 4,707,814.79 4,707,814.79 "EXHIBIT C" CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT APRIL 1, 2016 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Apr 1, 2016 to Sept 30, 2016 Beginning Impact Fee Balance * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IMPACTS FEES * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Water Sewer Total 6,034,676.28 4,676,034.72 10,710,711.00 Revenues: Impact Fees 489,978.00 278,335.29 768,313.29 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 2 185.00 135.05 320.05 Investments Income 3 16,216.33 7,653.16 23,869.49 Capital One - Investment Income 4 0.00 8,657.66 8,657.66 Misc Income 0.00 (494.41) (494.41) Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 Expenses: CCMA- NorthCliffe Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor /Accounting Services 5 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 6 0.00 2,179.47 2,179.47 Transferred Out 3,050,000.00 139,312.00 3,189,312.00 LAND /ROW (500.00) 0.00 (500.00) Total Revenue Over /(Under) Expense (2,544,120.67) 151,795.28 (2,392,325.39) Ending Impact Fee Balance 3,490,555.61 4,827,830.00 8,318,385.61 ' Impact Fees collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 2 Bank Interest collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016. Based on ending bank cash balance. 3 Investment Income collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 Water and Sewer have separate investment accounts. 4 Investment Income from the Capital One investment for Sewer recorded between Apr, 1 2016 through Sept 30, 2016. s Auditor Services performed during the year. 6 Investment Mgt Fee charged for the Capital One Investment between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 12 -20 -2016 01:13 PM 411 - CAPITAL RECOVERY - WATER ACCT# ACCOUNT NAME ASSETS 000 - 110000 Claim on Cash Cap Recov Water 000 - 116200.203 Inv L Star - Capital Rec Water 000 - 142404 Due From Capital Projects Fund LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 000 - 340000 Retained Earnings REVENUES 000 - 455900 Cap Rcvey -Water 000 - 491000 Interest Earned 000 - 491200 Investment Income EXPENDITURES C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z TRIAL BALANCE AS OF: SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2016 * ** MONTH TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 98,803.61 3,046,662.11 0.00 0.00 98,289.00 14.61 3,337.89 101- 541400 Auditor /Accounting Service 0.00 900 - 548406 Transfer Out - Public Imprvment 3,050,000.00 900 - 581010 LAND /ROW 500.00 * ** TOTALS * ** * ** END OF REPORT * ** 3,148,803.61 3,148,603.61 PAGE: 1 * ** YEAR TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 401,045.08 2,973,470.53 116,040.00 5,930,600.06 952,083.00 501.80 24,465.59 1,000.00 3,416,594.84 500.00 6,908,150.45 6,908,150.45 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM F"UNI IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS YEAR 2011 .......... 3,8924 City of Schertz Engineering Department AUgUst 26, 2171 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.OVERVIEW A. AUTHORITY B. CAUSE C. LAND USE ASSUMPTION'S 0. POPULATION ASSUMPTIONS 2 E. CRITERIA II. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN 3 A. WATER SYSTEM MPROVEMENTS . . 4 B. WASTEWATER SYSTEM MPROVEiVIENTS 5 i1I. IMPACT FEE DERIVATION. G IV. IMPACT FEE CALCULATION 12 TABLES 1 -17 13 EXHIBITS . . 28 APPENDIX A 36 APPENDIX B . . 1 75 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER AND SANITARY SEWER. SYSTEM CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM - IMPACT FEE ANALYSIS - YEAR 2011 L OVERVIEW ".111111ft"111MR1161 Pursuant to the Local Government Cade, Chapter 395, a municipality proposing, to assess impact fees shall submit to the Executive I)irector of Texas Commission of Environmental Quality (TCEQ) an application for review. Subsequent amendments to this chapter have established a requirement that once assessed, these fees, along with the land Use Assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan be reviewed at least every five - years. This report serves as the City of Schertz ( "City„) application for review of revised impact fees for the City's water and sanitary sewer system that City ovens and operates. Current impact fees for these systems are set at $3,288.40 (Water) and $1,364.40 (Sewer) per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). These fees were set by ordinance in 2006. The City proposes to decrease the water impact fees to $2,934.00 and increase the sewer impact fees to $1,668.00 per residential connection Living Unit Equivalent (LUE). B. CAUSE The Local Goverment Code allows for a five -year cycle for re- evaluating the fees, the present need for infrastructure additions has caused the need for a review and subsequent fluctuation in the assessments. C. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS. Population projections and current zoning maps are presented in Tables 1 -5 and Exhibit f "Current Zoning Map — Yr 2011 ". D. POPULATION ASSUMPTIONS Traditionally, population projections for cities have been made using the most current Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) projections. The projections shown in Tables 1 -3 were taken from the 2011 TWD13 Population Projections report. This information was updated to show the actual population in years 2005 and 2010. This report uses the TWDB published "20111 Regional Water Plan - City Population Projections for 2010 -2064" and "2011 Regional Water Plan - City Water Demand Projections for 20I 0- 20+60]." 'These are included as Appendix A & 13. The TWD13 information is extremely conservative and does not 2 accurately reflect the growth experienced by the City during the past five years. nor the projected growrtlh anticipated during the next Five year period. - TWDB Projected Population Year 2000 - 18,694 • Actual. Population Year 2000 - 24,963 • TWDB Projected Population Year 2010 - 26,856 • Actual Population Year 2010 - 33,719 • TWDB Projected Water Demand Year 2011 - 5.96 Million Gallons per Day • Actual Water Demand Year 2011 - 6.50 Million gallons per Day. E. CRITERIA Through evaluation of existing facilities capacity, we have defined facilities improvements and /or expansions required to meet future needs. Future capital expenditures to serve new development may be recovered through an impact fee but must be defined in a capital improvements plan. The Capital Improvements Plan, developed included in this report is based on a ten year planning horizon due to the explosive nature of the growth of the city. The plan includes only those items eligible for recovery under the law. Eligible items include: • Construction Costs • Surveying, Engineering and Planning fees; • Land Acquisition Costs • Principal and Interest on Bonds • Fees Paid to Prepare an Impact Fee Program Ineligible :costs, which may not be recovered through an impact fee, include: • Improvements to Existing Facilities to Meet Regulatory Standards • Upgrading to Service Existing, Development • Operation and Maintenance Costs • Facilities Not in Capital Improvements Plan • Dedicated land for Parks • Costs a Developer is Already Required to Pay by Other Valid Ordinances • Fees Collected and Placed in Tnist to Reimburse Developers for Oversized Facilities lilts Jlf1Ju1�.� +1'/1�'�1►�llF. -11 Planning for additional water and wastewater service needs is 'included in this report and consideration is made for proposed and new regulatory requirements as directed by the State of Texas and the EPA. Planning will play a vital part in City's ability to meet future demand without discouraging development. Key areas that must be considered when planning, to accommodate this demand include TCEQ regulations. financing., service area, land use development projections. and corresponding flow analysis. 3 A. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 1. The City's water CCN and service area is shown in Exhibit 2 ..Water Service Area — Yr 2008 ". Planning assumptions are presented in Table 6 for the Years 2011, 2016 and ultimate build -out. 2. The City's present system receives water from the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation at the East Live Oak Water Plant into a 7.5 Million Gallon (MG) storage tank and a 1.5 Million Gallon (MG) storage tank (the City pumped -,in average of 6.50 Million Gallons per Day (MGD) during, 2011). Frorn there, water is pumped to four elevated storage tanks located at FM 2252 and FM 3009, IH35 at Freeway Manor, East Live Oak Water plant and to Northcliffe (Exhibit 4). From these tanks water is then distributed to the entire City. In some Cases 4vater is pumped four miles to tam=s and distributed more than six miles from the tanks. 3. Due to the growth away from the central portion of the City, it was necessary to establish independent, but mutually supporting, zones for supporting average daily flows, pressure maintenance and fire flow. 4. The City is divided into four Quadrants (Exhibit 4) with the following infrastructure.; a. The Northwest (NW) Quadrant is served by the facilities at the East Live Oak Plant. a 7.5 MG ground storage tank and a 1.5 MG ground storage tank with the pumping Capabilities and ancillary improvements as shown in Exhibit 5. This quadrant facility will still he the primary receiving point for water from the SSLGC and the primary delivery facility to the other quadrants and potential future customers. b. The Southwest (SW) Quadrant is served by pumping modifications and a 1.5 MG elevated storage tank as shown in Exhibit 6. This facility will serve the southwest corridor and honor the emergency interconnect with Randolph AFB whose needs could reach I MGD. c. The Northeast (NF) Quadrant is served by a I MG Ireland storage tcink with puinpinf, modifications as shown in Exhibit 7, which receives water from the NW Quadrant facility and pumps it to the l MG elevated tank above Scenic Hills. This facility serves the northeast corridor and will honor the potential interconnect with other customers. d. The Southeast (SE) Quadrant is served the 1.5 MG elevated tank serving the SW Quadrant presently. However, it will be served in 4 the future by a new putnping facility, a new 3 MG ground storage tank, and a new 1 MG elevated tank at an undetermined location as shown in Fxhibit 8. "phis facility will receive water from an interconnection with the SSI,GC 36" transmission main from Nixon. This facility will serve the southeast corridor and honor the potential interconnect with other customers. e. Associated transmission and distribution mains and quadrant interconnects. f. Additional interconnects to feed the IH 35 corridor and the northeast quadrant of the City. 5. During the current reporting; period, 2005 thru 2010, the City collected $5,695.443.94 in Water Impact Fees. During this period, the City constructed the following facilities using a combination of collected fees and Bond proceeds: a. Live Oak Plant (NW Quad) Improvements $3,569,135 b. NE Quad Elevated Tank and Pump Sta $3,532,899 c. SW Quad Elevated Tank $2,758,744 d. 16 " Transmission Main $ 635,936 e. Various Distribution Mains $ 347,011. $10.843,725 6. Future Facilities included in the current flan are as follows: a. SE Quad Pump Station $1,088.284 b. SE Quad GS7 $1.100,000 c: SE Quad Elevated "Fank $1.250,000 d. NE Quad Distribution Mains $1,600,000 e. SE Quad Distribution Mains $1,700,000 1H 111 Corridor Distribution Mains $1 ,000,000 $8,338,289 011t,"010131ii•1 +11*�OUTl0,li0 1. The City's Wastewater CCN and service area is shown in Exhibit 3, "Sewer Service Area"- Planning assumptions are presented in Table 7 for the Years 2.011.2016 and ultimate build -out. 2. The City's sewer system is presently made up of sewer lines within the various subdivisions discharging into a collector system owned and maintained by the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (COMA). This collector system transports wastewater to the CC:MA regional treatment 5 plant located south of FM 78 adjacent to Cibolo Creek. Each connection to the CCMA system requires payment to thern of an impact fee in the amount of $180+x.00. 3. The Town Creek Sewer Projcct added a collection facility for areas of the northwestern region the city. The project added a lift station at Friesenlialin Lane near 482 and a lift station hear the Northcliffe subdivision on 11-135. These lift stations are joined by a force main and an additional force main and gravity sewer connects the Northcliffe lilt station to an existing COMA lift station on FM 78. 4. A treatment plant built off of FM 1518 close to the Woman Hollering Creek anchored by a 2500 unit Planned Unit Develop has been built and turned over to the city. This gives accessibility to sewer and allows for growth in the southern region of the city. Also a lift station has been built to service this treatment plaint. The City is working with COMA to cause construction of a regional treatment plant in the southern part of Schertz. This plant will be constructed by COMA. 4. In that interconnection will be prevalent and the casts are similar in the different areas, the City has assumed a service area wide approach to establishing impact fees for wastewater service. 5. mitring the current reporting period. 2005 thru 2010, the City collected $2,577,179.08 in Sewer Impact Fees. During this period, the City constructed the following facilities using a co9nbination of collected fees and Band proceeds: a. Town Creek Sewer Phases 1 & 1 f $ 4.900,000 6. Future Facilities included in the current Plan are as follows: a. Final South Sewershed Mastc,r flan b. Town Creek Phase Ill c. Town Creek Phase IV d. Woman Hollering Creek STP PH I1 d. South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station III. IMPACT FEE DERIVATION $ 15,000 $ 659.126 $ 1 ,000,000 $ 600.000 $ 9,600.000 $11,674.126 A. By definition, an impact fee shall not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of capital improvements or facility expansions. including the cast of impact fee report preparation, necessitated and attributed to new development by the total dumber of projected new service units. For purposes of 6 improvements. pay overhead and maintenance costs, or meet other expenses. Therefore, times coverage is not included as a cast of service element in the Equity Residual model, and is not shown on Table A. 2. Methods for recovering {Costs of Service. Generally speaking, costs can be financed through either the public sector or the private sector. Financing through the public sector is primarily accomplished by bonding projects and recovering costs through the rates. Financing through the private sector occurs when a developer or builder contributes assets, either facilities or cash, and passes along this cost (including carrying and financing costs) to the ultimate buyer or renter of the development. A capital recovery fee is one mechanism for private financing; other examples are developer contribution, developer cost participation in utility facilities, etc. Whether private or public financing is More cost - effective; is determined by many variables. including interest rates, term, mark-up percentage, bonding costs, etc, The Equity residual methodology recognizes and utilizes the concept that all customers pay part or all of their cost of service through public- sector financing by virtue of the fact that they pay rates to retire debt service, The central tenet of the Equity Residual approach is that future utility customers will partially pay for their own costs of service: through rate payments in an amount typically equal to the remaining debt service payback for existing customers. The remainder of their costs of service, or the "residual" amount. will be subject to payment through a capital recovery fee. Thus, future customers will be permitted to pay a portion of their costs of service through the rates. similar to existing customers.. However, existing customers will not, in the long -term, bear the cost of facilities for future customers, Thus, the Equity residual approach allows fixture customers to pay their costs of service partially through the public sector (with rate payments equal to existing custo €ners) and partially through the private sector (through a capital recovery fee). The following sections provide a more detailed discussion of this conceptual approach. 3. System Equity and Remaining Indebtedness for Existing LUE Demand. On the left side of Table A is a representation of the Cast of Service for each unit of caisting demand and the method for paying these costs. Theoretically, each existing unit of service has a full cost associated with it, consisting; of construction costs, bonding costs, and interest costs. (Prior to the adoption of capital recovery fees, construction costs were fully bonded and thus subjected to banding, and interest costs.) Customers in this group have, for the most part, been permitted to pay their full Cost of Service throu-h the rates without an up -front cash payment of costs, as shown in the second bar for existing service. demand. The second left -hand burr is divided into two se-inents: system equity and remaining. indebtedness. Fxi ting customers, on the date a capital recover), fee ordinance is adapted. will have theoretically paid some portion of their full Cost of Service through past rate payments. Thus, they have a certain amount of "equity" in the existing utility system. This is shown on the bottom portion of the second bar. Existing customers also have a corresponding amount of remaining indebtedness to be paid through future rate payments over the next 25 -30 years. This is depicted on the top portion of the bar_ "These two payment components -- equity and remaining indebtedness -- thus describe the 'Total Payment of each customer's Full Cost of Service for existing service unit demand. 4. Calculation of Cost of 'Service for Future Service Unit Demand. On the right side of'Table A is a depiction of the Cost of Service for_f oure LUE demand. The Cost of Service for future customers will be higher than that for existing custorners due to inflation and possibly due to technological and regulatory changes. if these new facilities are bonded, they will have not only construction - related costs. but also bonding and interest costs (similar to those for existing customers). These latter costs will also be higher than comparable costs for existing customers because bonding and interest costs are directly proportional to the higher new construction costs. E. FAIRNLSS BETWEEN CUSTOMERS THROUGH THE RAT STRUCTURE. A key concept in the Equity Residual methodology is that rate payments of future customers are dedicated to retirement of debt for facilities for fixture needs, while rate payments of existing custorners are used to pay for facilities for existing needs. Application of this concept has two primary results: ■ Cross - subsidization between existing and future customers is minimized: and • Future customers enter the utility systems on an equal basis with existing customers. This approach is affected by purposefully setting the total payback indebtedness of future customers to the same- amount as the total payback for existing customers, Thus, in Table A, the remaining indebtedness for each service unit of existing demand is the same as for each service unit of future demand. In order to accomplish this equalization, however. future customers will have to submit a '"system equity" payment to contribute their remaining Cost of Service and to put them on a par status with existing customers (see discussion below). I-,'. EQUITY RESIDUAL AND EQUITY CONTRIBUTION FOR FUTURE LUF I FMANI-). The second bar in the right -hand diagram of Figure 4 -1 shows the payment methods for future customers. At the top of the bar is indebtedness equal to that of existing customers. This indebtedness includes construction and bonding costs 9 (both principal payments) and interest payments. Below the indebtedness payback are shown the components of the remaining Cost of Service. or that portion which roust be paid to achieve fairness through the rate structure. This portion of the Cost of Service has been designated "System Equity ", similar to past debt payments by existing, customers. System Equity has three components, as do all Costs of Service: construction cost, bonding cost. and interest cost. If the construction costs in the System Equity portion of the Cost of Service were to be paid in cash, corresponding bonding and interest costs would be avoided. The remaining construction costs, or "residual ", would be the actual payment necessary to achieve fairness -- or equity -- in the utility system. This residual cost is the amount which should be subjected to payment in a capital recovery fee. In sum, the Equity Residual approach to funding improvements will result in a payment for Cast of Service for future service demand which has the following characteristics: 1. A portion of the Cost of Service will be paid through the rates; the total payback on this portion of the Cost of Service will equal that for total capital indebtedness for existing customers reflected in the rate structure; 2. New customers will contribute equity status in the utility systern by paying, the remaining, tin - bonded portion of construction costs ( "residual ") through a capital recovery fee; 3. Bonding, and interest costs associated with residual construction costs will be avoided. 4. This approach will result in full cost recovery for growth from payments made by future customers. G. POTENTIAL BENEFITS OF THE EQUITY RESIDUAL APPROACH. As shown in Table. A, the Equity Residual approach to calculating the capital recovery fee has Borne benefits for all parties, Although this method does not achieve absolute equity aniong customers, it is designed to minimize cross - subsidization and thereby provide appropriate benefits to all affected parties. H. EXISTING CUSTOMERS. First of all, the Equity Residual approach benefits existing customers because they would pay for their own costs of service and would not substantially subsidize new customers. Thereforc, future rate increases will generally reflect only renovation and operations costs and not growth- related system expansion costs. It is important to note, however. that a stabilization of the rates is a benefit which will likely be achieved over several years. It is very possible that there will be near -term rate increases because of the immediate need or tiiriing f«r system expansion or due to prior contract commitments. Moreover_ the short period in which capital recovery fee revenues have been generated ixiay necessitate bonding Ti] while awaiting fee revenues to accumulate. i.e., some system improvements may be necessary before sufficient building permits can be issued and fees collected. This is especially true because of the grandfathering provisions of CHAPTER 3'95. 1. FUTURE CUSTOMERS. Future customers will also be benefited by the Equity Residual approach to fee calculation. Although these customers will be rewired to make partial cash payment for utility service, their overall cost of service will be less than it would have been if the entire amount had been bonded and subjected to interest costs. Thus, even though construction casts for new facilities are higher than those for older facilities (due to inflation and other changes), new customers will not realize that entire cost increase. This occurs because bonding and interest costs are avoided on a portion of the construction costs_ Thus fixture customers would enjoy lower rates than would have otherwise been required to pay their cost of service and would realize an overall cost savings in spite of high construction costs. It is important to note, however, that these overall cost Savings are achieved by private financing of the utility. Thus, the future customer must either have cash for fee payment or must finance the fee, and thus incur associated interest costs through the private sector. However. mortgage interest payments (which includes in the home cost the capital recovery fee payments) made through the private sector are currently deductible items on federal income tax payments. Because a portion of interest payments could be deducted on income tax returns (while utility rate payments could not), future customers would riot experience the full effect of interest coasts applied to capital recovery fee financing. J. THE UTILITY. The utility also receives benefits from the Equity Residual model. This methodology will produce a relatively predictable source of revenues and will thus facilitate cost - and service - effective planning by the utility. Although this model is not intended to totally avoid bonding of facility improvements, it will reduce the need for bonding. In addition to the economic benefits to the utility, the Equity Residual method is designed to meet the tests of reasonableness and to operate within the defined legal parameters of CHArrER 395. As a result, all customers would be treated on an equitable basis with fee schedules based can cost of service. This approach, therefore. should provide the utility with a legally defensible methodology_ which will protect the capital recovery fee revenue source in the event of legal challenge. Table A provides a summary of the Equity Residual model's responsiveness to tests of reasonableness and legal constraints. EVALUATION FACTOR COMMENTS Protection of Community Basis in cost of service and comprehensive planning documents of the City; Health, Safety, and designated for facilities required for the protection of the community health, safety, Welfare and welfare. Basis in Cost of Service Based on proportional cost of service calculation, with a portion of the cost paid through the rates and the remainder through capital recovery fee. Among Costs are leveled among classes due to administrative and data limitations, Classes However, cost leveling of this type has long historical precedent. The only likely inter -class inequities are those due to administrative and technical limitations. Equity Between Generations After an initial adjustment period, the net effect would be to substantially eliminate (Existing vs. cross- subsidization between customers who enter the utility system at various Future points in time. Customers) Punitive Effects No punitive effects, other than the unavoidable impacts caused by administrative limitations. The need for facilities supported by capital recovery fee is documented; the fee is Demand based on CIP and cost of service consistent with CHAPTER 395 requirements, Rational Nexus thus the fee is proportional to demand. The fee is based on cost of service; thus, benefits received are proportional to fees Nexus Benefit Nexus paid. The utilities are established as integrated systems such that fees do not need to be geographically dedicated in order to establish the benefit nexus. Cost of service calculation as required by CHAPTER 395 is somewhat complex; Administrative Feasibility requirements of CHAPTER 395 may require detailed accounting. However, actual administration of fee collection activities can be simple and efficient. Growth Does not require a full cash payment for growth - related costs, but does essentially Effects eliminate cross - subsidization. May require public education efforts. Rate Effects Expected to stabilize rates (related to system - expansion debt retirement) after initial adjustment period. Potential Community Economic effects are generally predictable and will change gradually over time, Concerns Economic provided city projections of future growth are relatively accurate. Probability for Impacts prohibitively high fee is reduced because a portion of costs is paid through utility rates Legal Specifically designed to respond to external legal constraints, both those are Vulnerability contained in CHAPTER 395 and those implied by recent case law. TABLE A: RESPONSIVENESS OF EQUITY RESIDUAL APPROACH TO TESTS OF REASONABLENESS AND LEGAL CONSTRAINTS WJML The impact fee calculations are performed in tables 1 -17 that follow this section. Q CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 1 PROJECTED POPULATION 1 •1 " YEAR Population Growth [a) _ Trend Annual ROW (b) TWOS (LOW) TWDS Annual Rate TWOS (High) Low Medium High Trend 7.262 5.98% 1984 (b) 11.400 11,93`Ya 1986 (b) 11,500 Law 1987 (b) 1960 2,281 2,281 2,281 2,281 I 2,281 0.0044 2,281 1970 4,061 4,061 4,061 4,061 5.94% 4.061 5.94% 4,061 1980 7,262 7,262 7,262 7.262 5.98% 7,262 5.980/0 7;262 1984 11,400 11.400 11.400 11,404 1193% 11,400 11.93% 11,400 198,5 11,500 11,5DO 11 500 11,500 044% 11.500 4.44°! 11,500 1987 12,000 , cool 12.000 12,000 435% 12.000 4.35% 12.000 1988 12.000 12.0 12000 12,000 000% 12,000 0.00% 12,000 1989 12.000 12.0 12.000 12.000 0.00% 12,000 0.00: 12,000 1890 12,000 12.00 12.000 12,000 0.009'6 12,000 000% 12,000 1992 12,373 12,37 12,373 12,373 154% 12.373 154% 12,373 1994 13,817 13.81 13,817 13,817 5.67% 13,817 5,67% 13,817 1996 15,750 15,75 15,750 15,750 677% 15,750 6,77% 15,750 2000 24,963 24,98 24,963 24,983 12.20% 24,963 12.20°/ 24,963 2005 31,300 31,30 31,300 31,300 4.63% 31,300 463% 31,300 2010 33.719 35.41 37,175 35,413 2.5096 33,719 1.53% 37,175 2020 39,132 45,33 52,438 45.332 2.50% 39.132 150% 52.438 2030 45,415 58.02 73,970 58,028 2.50% 45,4115 1 50 % 73,970 2040 52,705 74,281 104,341 74,281 2.50455 52,705 1.50% 104,341 [a) Aasurne ann, pop growth rates of 1 5% 2.5% 3.5% 5.0% , respectively and that sufficient land area will be available to provide for future city population 2006 -2010 population estimates provided by City of Schert2 [b) Trend projection at slightly subdued historical growth rate (From 2010 Projections) TABLE 2 HISTORICAL POPULATION FOR THE CITY OF SCHERTZ YEAR HISTORICAL CITY OF SCHERTZ POPULATION HISTORICAL AVERAGE ANNUAL POPULATION GROWTH RATE 1960(a) 2,281 1970(s) 4.061 594% 1980(a) 7.262 5.98% 1984 (b) 11.400 11,93`Ya 1986 (b) 11,500 044% 1987 (b) 12.000 4 35V6 1988 (b) 12,000 0.001/0 1989 (b) 12,000 0.0044 1990 (b) 12,040 0.00% 1992(b) 12,373 1,54% 1994(b) 13,817 5.67% 1996 (b) 15,750 6.77% 2000 (b) 24,963 1220°% 2005 (b) 31.300 4.63% 2010 (b) 35,413 2.50% 11360-010 5,64% (a) U S. Bureau of the Census (b) City of Sehertz estimates. alir201 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 3 THREE ALTERNATIVE GROWTH RATE PROJECTIONS CITY OF SCHERTZ Assumes'ull buiidout equal to TA€iLE 4 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS GROWTH PROJECTIONS CITY OF SCHERTZ 90.705 SOURCE ESTIMATEDIPROJECTED CITY OF SCHERTZ POPULATION PROJECTED AVERAGE ANNUAL POPULATION GROWTH RATE YEAR LOW MED. HIGH LOW MED. HIGH 1990 17,180 92,3,70 12.420 1.50% 2.50% 3.50% 2000 25,337 25,587 25.837 150% 2.50% 3.5046 27305 27.296 28,949 30.686 150% 2.50% 3.50°10 2010 29,405 32,754 36.445 1 50% 250% 3.50% 2020 34,126 41,927 51.410 150% 2.50% 3.50`Yo 2034 39,604 53,671 72.518 1.50% 2.50% 350% Assumes'ull buiidout equal to TA€iLE 4 COMPARISON OF VARIOUS GROWTH PROJECTIONS CITY OF SCHERTZ 90.705 SOURCE 1990 2000 2010 2020 2030 TWD8 (Low) (a) 12,000 2x,963 33.719 39,132 45,415 TWAB (144gh) (a) 12.000 24,963 37.175 52,438 73,970 TWOB (Average) (a) 12.000 24.963 35,447 45.785 59.692 Trend (6.08 %) 12,677 21,939 37,968 90,705 90.705 3.5% Annual Rate 12,A20 25.837 36.445 51,410 72,518 2 5% Annual Rate 12.300 25,587 32,754 41,927 53,671 1,5% Annual Rate 12,180 25,337 29,405 34,126 39,604 ta) TWDB 2011 Propeclions of Population 8 Municipal Water Demands. 811 raa11 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 5 CURRENT AND PROJECTED LAND USES AND POPULATION CITY OF SCHERTZ (a) ACreages based on land use mixtures per 100 population in Schertz Zoning Plan 2011 2016 ULTIMATE LAND USE Multifamily- 0,177 acres1100 population Commercial 5 476 acres1100 population ACRES (a) % ACRES (a) °I ACRES Sa) `Yo RESIDENTIAL (c) 2011 -2016 average annual growth rate assumption of, 5.5`ti THIS USED FOR REPORT Single- Family 2,469 1270% 3.227 14 19% 5.512 21 84% Garden and Mobile Homes 506 2.60% 661 2.91% 1,130 448% Mull+f8mdy 72 0.37% 94 0 41 % 161 064% Subtotai Residential 3,D47 15.67% 3,982 1751% 6,802 2695% COMMERCIAL 3.8510 1980% 5.032 22.13% 8.595 3405% INDUSTRIAL 3,798 1954% 4,964 2183% 2,349 931% PUBLICIQUASI-PUBLIC 977 5.03% 812 3.57% 174 069% AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIALNACANT 7,770 39.97°i 7,952 34 97% 7 322 29011/. TOTAL ACREAGE 19.442 100.00% 22,742 100.00% 25.242 100.00% POPULATION (c) (bii POPULATION PER ACRE 1.87 209 359 (a) ACreages based on land use mixtures per 100 population in Schertz Zoning Plan Single Family. 6.077 acresl100 population Garden and Mobile Homes 1 245 acresllOO population Multifamily- 0,177 acres1100 population Commercial 5 476 acres1100 population Industrial 2.590 acres1100 population Public/Quasi- Public. 0 192 acrest100 population Agncultural ResicenlialCJacant. 8,073 acrestl00 population 1b) Ultimate population within 2016 corporate boundaries (c) 2011 -2016 average annual growth rate assumption of, 5.5`ti THIS USED FOR REPORT L;, 1n 120- 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE {Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 6 PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS APPLIEU TO CONCEPTUAL WATER SERVICE AREA CITY OF SCHERTZ (a) Some distribution of raeve;opeci land uses per capita a3 aMsu ned for City planning areas (b) Land use mixtures per 100 population of growth as indicated in city zoning plan Single Family. Garden and Mobile Homes- Multifamily- Commercial. Indust'ial P ublICdOwasi- Publ,c: Agr :cultural Reside tialNacanl (c) Conceptual service area acreage. (d) 2011 water balling chided by (e) Assumes annual growth rate of (1) Land uses and population proportionate to City 607-7 acres1100 population 1 2A5 acreW100 population 0 177 acres! 00 population 9 478 acresi100 population 2,550 acres1100 population 0,192 acres1100 poputabon 8 072 Etc res1100 popular on 30 gallons per Conn (TWOS) 5.50'h 2011 2016 ULTIMATE LAND USE ACRES (a) % ACRES (b) % ACRES (b) % RESIDENTIAL, Single -Fnn ily 2,468 1178% 2,891 13.81% 4,573 2184% Garden and Mobile Homes 505 2 42% 593 283% 937 448% multifmmily 72 034% 84 040% 133 0.64% Subtotal Residential 3.045 14 54% 3.568 1704%. 5.644 25.95% COMMERCIAL 3,622 173()0/6 4 „509 2153% 7,131 34.05% INDUSTRIAL 3,79& 1814% 1,232 5 88% 1,949 931% PUBLICIQUASI- PUBLIC 977 4 67% 747 367% 144 069% AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIALJVACANT n 10985 51 98% 6074 2901% TOTAL ACREAGE (c) 23,942 100 00% 20.942 100.00% 26 942 100.00% POPULATION (d) (e) f,fl POPULATION PER ACRE 1 7 2,27 3.55 (a) Some distribution of raeve;opeci land uses per capita a3 aMsu ned for City planning areas (b) Land use mixtures per 100 population of growth as indicated in city zoning plan Single Family. Garden and Mobile Homes- Multifamily- Commercial. Indust'ial P ublICdOwasi- Publ,c: Agr :cultural Reside tialNacanl (c) Conceptual service area acreage. (d) 2011 water balling chided by (e) Assumes annual growth rate of (1) Land uses and population proportionate to City 607-7 acres1100 population 1 2A5 acreW100 population 0 177 acres! 00 population 9 478 acresi100 population 2,550 acres1100 population 0,192 acres1100 poputabon 8 072 Etc res1100 popular on 30 gallons per Conn (TWOS) 5.50'h CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 13/1/11) TABLE 7 PLANNING ASSUMPTIONS APPLIED TO CONCEPTUAL WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA CITY OF SCHERTZ (a) Same distrlbvuon of developed land uses per capita as assumed for City planning areas (b) Land use mixtures per 10C population of growth as indicated in city zoning plan 2011 2016 ULTIMATE LAND USE Mullifamily 0.177 acres1100 population Commercial: 9 476 acres1100 population ACRES (a) % ACRES (b) % ACRES (b) % RESIDENTIAL (d) Population based on same density as wwatef service! area (e) Assumes annual growth rate of 5.5`'#0 (0 Land uses and population proportiogale to City Single-Family 3,307 115296 2,591 10,09% 6,258 2104% Garden and Mobile Names 506 177% 593 2,07% 1,282 448% Multifamily 72 025% 84 0.29% 182 064% Subtotal Residential 3,878 13.53% 3.568 1245% 7.723 25 9596 COMMERCIAL 4,598 16.04% 4.509 1573% 9,758 34.05% INDUSTRIAL 3,798 13.2591 1,232 4.30% 2,987 931% PUSLIC10UASI-PUBLIC 977 341% 1,023 357% 197 069% AGRICULTURAL RESID I VACANT 15,406 5376% 18,325 63.95% 8,312 29 01 TOTAL ACREAGE ?c), 28,657 10000% 28,657 10000% 28.657 100.00% POPULATION (d) (e) M P0PULAT1CN PER ACRE 1 74 166 3.59 (a) Same distrlbvuon of developed land uses per capita as assumed for City planning areas (b) Land use mixtures per 10C population of growth as indicated in city zoning plan Single Family 6,071 acres/1,00 population Duplex: 1 246 acres!'00 population Mullifamily 0.177 acres1100 population Commercial: 9 476 acres1100 population Indt.slnal. 2 590 acres1100 population Public/Ouasl- Public: 0.192 acres1100 population Agricultural ResidentiatllVacant 8.072 acresl100 population (c) Conceptual service area acreage (d) Population based on same density as wwatef service! area (e) Assumes annual growth rate of 5.5`'#0 (0 Land uses and population proportiogale to City CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 1XPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 8 WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL RECOVERY FEE STUDY ASSUMPTIONS USED IN FEE CALCULATION FACTOR VALUEIRATIONALE POPULATION GROWTH Increase al an annual average rate of 5.50 % over the next ten years LAND USE DISTRIBUTION Acreages based on land use mtx;ures in Zoning Plan Single Family 6.077 acres11CC} population Garden and Mobile Homes 1 245 acre:s1100 population Multifamily 0 177 acresl100 population Commercial 9.476 acres7100 population Industnal 2 590 acres/100 population PublidClUasl- Public 0.152 acres /100 population Agricultural R,esidentral/Vacant 8 072 scrosF100 population RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES Single Family (R -A. R -1. R -2. R -513, R -6, R -7, PUD) 3,48 unitslac; 3,50 persons /unit Garden and Mobile Homes (R -5, MH) 5 50 uniWac; 2.50 personslunit MUki- Family (R-4) 2000 unitsfac. 2.54 personslunit. PERCENT OF NEW GROWTH RECEIVING: Water Service 100% Wastewater Service 100% 2011 SERVICE POPULATION; Water 2011 water billing divided by 300 gallons per Conn (TWDB) Wastewater Based on same service population per acre as water: 1.74 persons /ac. 2011 WATER DEMAND ASSUMPTIONS: Average demand 300 galsiconn/daily Water LUE 216 gals/LUE/daily Water Supply Facilities 300 gals/conn /daily Ground Storage Facilities 200 galslconn /dally Elevated Storage Facilities 300 gelsloonn /dapiy FUTURE BONDING ASSUMPTIONS: SOFT COSTS 3.00% of principal. according to City Staff INTEREST RATE 500% annually. according to City Staff TERM 20 years ehrmT1 CITY OF 8CHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPnATZ (Amended 8 %1 /11) TABLE 9 LUE EQUIVALENCIES FOR VARIOUS TYPES AND SIZES OF WATER METERS METER TYPE METER SIZE CONT. DUTY MAXIMUM RATE (apml RATIO TO S+a" METER SIMPLE Ua' x 314" 15 l a SIMPLE 314" 25 1 7 SIMPLE 1" 50 33 SIMPLE f -V2" 80 53 SIMPLE 2` 100 67 COMPOUND 2" 160 10.7 TURBINE 2" 160 10.7 COMPOUND 3" 350 233 TURBINE 3" 30D 20.0 COMPOUND 4" 1000 667 TURBINE 4" 800 53 3 COMPOUND 6" 1000 667 TURBINE 6" 1750 1167 COMPOUND 8" 1000 667 TURBINE 8' 2000 1333 COMPOUND 10" 2000 1333 TURBINE 10" 2600 1733 TURBINE 17" 3300 220.0 SOURCE, Manufacturers Sean tiaras and AWWA Siandalds 0700. 0701. C702. 0703.. W /201 I CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE Sir UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 10 CURRENT WATER METER COUNT AND ESTIMATION OF LIVING UNIT EQUIVALENTS (LUEs) Meter Size Number of M€ltem [a] LUEs per Meter tb] Number of LUEs 518" 11.522 1,000 11.522 314" 71 1 667 119 V. 187 3.333 523 15" 128 5.333 683 2 "S W 6.667 593 2"T 6 10.667 64 3° C 14 21333 327 r T 0 20.000 0 4'C 9 66.667 533 4" T 6 53.333 0 V 0 116 967 0 Total 12,025 14.461 [a] Souroe Water SerMiCeS Kep nn. 71£1/11, [b] Derwed from AWWA C700-C703 standards. 800011 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (A dad 8/1/11) TA13LE 11 FCTIMATFrt Sr= riVirc7 I IMITI, AAIn S,1 =0vit C r1CMAh1n _ WATGG I ITII ITV FACILITY TYPEILAND USE 2011 2016 ULTIMATE WATER SERVICE AREA POPULATION 36,405 47,580 75,254 (a) TOTAL WATER LUE'S (b) 14.464 16.903 29.898 TOTAL CONNECTIONS (b) 12,025 15,716 24,857 WATER SUPPLY (MGD) Estimated Demand (c)(d) 6.50 $.50 13.44 11 839 11.139 11 +339 Existing Capacity (c) Excessl(DeSclency) 5.339 3.344 (1597) GROUND STORAGE (MG) Estimated Demand (c) 9.750 12.743 20.154 Existing Cacacd c 11.000 11.000 11.000 Excessd(Deficiency) 1.250 (1.743) (9.154). ELEVATED STORAGE (MG) Estimated Demand C 3.W8 4,715. Existing Capacity (c ) 4.500 4 500 4.500 Excessf(peticiency) 0 893 (0 215) (2.957) (a) Taken from land use assumptions, TABLE B (b) 2011 figure taken from meter count. sea TABLE 10 Future LUE`s projected as same ratio of LUE's to population as 2011, future connections projected as same ratio of connections to LUE's as 2011 (c) Actual for 2011 (d) Ratio of demand to connections for 2711 TABLE 12 ESTIMATED SERVICE UNITS - WASTEWAT ER UTILITY FACILITY TYPE&AND USE 2011 2015 ULTIMATE WASTEWATER SERVICE AREA POPULATION 36,405 47,5134 75,254 EST. SEWER CUSTOMER POPULATION (a) 25,720 33.615 53,167 TOTAL LUE'S b 10,219 13.355 21.123 PRIMARY SEWER COLLECTION Estimated Demand (C) 2 572 3 362 5 317 C 2.254 2 250 Excessl(Deficienc 0.322 1112) {3.067 (a) 'Serves popu)at!on based on ratio of f )' I wastewater cusdomers to water customers times water service population (b) Wastewater LUE'sIcapta same as 2011 water LUFsfcapita Rolm CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 13 ASSOCIATED CIP INVENTORY AND COST, WATER UTILITY WWII FACILITY CAPACITY (mgd or gals) 2011- 2011- 2016 2016 FACILITY CONST. IN EXCESS EXCESS CAPITAL COST NAME COST TOTAL CURRENT e 5 YEARS > 5 YEARS COST TOTAL PER LUE USE SUPPLY, PUMPING MGD EXISTING FACILITIES NW Quad Pump Ste (ELO) $1,362.037 0 657 Water Maint Facility $791.818 SW Quad Pump Sta $469.201 1.125 NE Ouad Pump Sta Upgrade $381,390 3.000 NIN Quad Pump Sta Upgrade (e) $0 6.$57 Naco - Well #11, Pump @ 200 hp $170,000 Naco - Well 92, Pump @ 200 hp $170.000 Subtotal' Existing Facilities $3,345.046 11.8399 6.560 5.339 0.000 $1,508,550 5495 0) (a) (b) (b) (b) FUTURE FACILITIES SE Ouad Pump Sta $1,63a,285 1 125 Water Wells & Treatment So 0 000 Subtotal Future Facilities $1,688,289 1 125 0.000 1.125 0 000 51.688 289 S2.628 13) 1 a Ib) (b) (b) TOTAL WATER SUPPLY $5,033.335 12 964 6.500 6.464 0.000 $3,156.839 S860 GROUND STORAGE MG EXISTING FACILITIES NW Quad Tank (ELO) $450.00.0 1 500 Ware Seguin Tank $150.000 0.500 Deer Haven Well Site Tank Al $1504000 0500 NE Quad Tank $1,245,160 1 000 NW Quad Regional Tank $3,364,064 7.500 Subtotal Existing Facilities $5.359.224 11.000 9150 2.993 (1 743) $1,458,128 $395 ta) (a) (b) (b) (b) FUTURE FACILITIES SE Quad Tank 51,100.000 3 000 Subtotal Future Facllltles $1.100,000 3 000 0.000 3.000 0.000 S1,100,0D0 $297 TOTAL GROUND STORAGE S6,4s9,224 1400(l 9 750 2.303 (1.743) S2,558.128 $693 C) WWII CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE. STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8%1/11) TABLE 13 (CONTINUED► ASSOCIATED CIP INVENTORY AND COST • WATER UTILITY (a) Source City of Schettt FACILITY CAPACITY (MGD or GAL) 2011- 2011- (c) Assumes the following enrwers:on factors, derived from engineering demand per LUE in 2011 Supplyrrreatmenl 2016 2016 Ground Storage IN EXCESS EXCESS CAPITAL COST FACILITY CONST. NAME COST TOTAL CURRENT c 5 YEARS a 5 YEARS COST TOTAL PER LUE USE AGE MG EXISTING FACILITIES 1H 35 Tank 51,609,170 1.500 NC Quad Tank (NOrthdiffe) 511,690,547 1 000 SW Quad Tank (Lower Zone) $1.830,085 1 500 Naco Well Sirs Tank *I 5500,000 0 500 Subtotal Extsling Facilities 55.629 755 4.500 3.508 0554 C.3 a9 5692.684 5375 FUTURE FACILITIES SE Quad Tanis $1.250,000 1 000 Subtotal Future Facilities $1 250,000 1 000 0.000 1 0 $1,250,000 5375 (a) (a) (b) (b) (b) TOTAL ELEVATED STORAGE $6,879,755 5 500 3606 1.107 0 339 $1,942.684 $526 (c WATER TRANSMISSION AVERAGE MGD EXISTING FACILITIES 18" Water Main $500,000 5.472 20" Water Main $600.000 5.760 16" Water Main $270000 4 320 16" 2001 Water Mains 51,049.375 .. 5930,569 5 472 Schrmlervrlle Water Extension 5212.818 2.880 Subtotal Existing Facilities 53,562,762 23,904 34 63z 7 973 (t -701)1 51,188.325 5429 da) (a) (b) (b, tb) FUTURE FACILITIES iii Oaa , . • . r: $1.600,000 SE Quad Distribution 51,700,000 4.320 12" Again, FM 1.518 to FM 78 $230.000 IH10 Carridor $1,000.000 Subtotal Future Facilities 54,530,000 4 320 3 COO 2.658 ).552 $2.786.852 53,020 (a) (a) (b) (b) Gb) TOTAL WATER TRANSMISSION $8,092,762 28 224 34 632 10 631 (17 039) $3,975,181 51.077 WATER CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $26,465,076 $51,672,832 $3,152 (a) Source City of Schettt (b) Allocations aocordrng 10 City of Sehertz (c) Assumes the following enrwers:on factors, derived from engineering demand per LUE in 2011 Supplyrrreatmenl 1,751 gals daily = 1 LUE. Ground Storage 811 gals dally = 1 LUE Elevated Storage: 300 gals daily = 1 LUE Tran$m ssion 7,880 gals daily = 1 LUE (d) Project in progress (e) Included in NW Quad Tank Project 0.6 GPM 1 CONNECTION 200 GAL I CONNECTION 300 GAL 1 CONNECTION 2 GPM I CONNECTION 1: ai,nar t CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 14 ASSOCIATED CIP INVENTORY AND COST - WASTEWA T ER L TILITY (a) Source City of Schertz (b) Sdurce� City of Schertz. capac4ty adequate to serve 30,UDO (shown at average demand) (C) Proportioriate st=are of 2011 sewer service population-, see TABLE 7 (d) 2011 demand allocated propor5onate between available excess in existing facilities and future facilities (e) Source Ctty of Schertz. rapacity adequate to serve 49.DOC (show at average demand) (f) Remainder of available rapacity (g) Assumes the following gals to LUE convemron factors, based on CapaCity estimates. Collection 245 gals dally = 1 LUE (hj Wastewater treatment Canstructian assts are rletermmed by New Braunfels Utilities and Clbolo Creek Municipal Authority in add+ *.ion to casts shown and are reflected in the impact fees charged by Ihese two entilies to Schertz customers (g) South Schenz Line A. tine B. Lift Station 12 f1 IWI t FACILITY CAPACITY (irtgd or gals) 2011 • 2011- 2016 2016 IN EXCESS EXCESS FACILITY CONST. CAPITAL COST NAME COST TOTAL CURRENT s 5 YEARS > 6 YEARS COST TOTAL PER LUE USE COLLECTION AND PUMPING AVERAGE MGD EXISTING FACILITIES Existing Cclleclion Line Network 3 000 3.000 Dry Corral Outfall Line, Phase III $120,070 Dry Comal Outfall Line, Phase IV 5160,247 2000 1.000 Town Creek Seaver Phase I and 11 $5.940.874 2000 South Schertz Sewer Study 528,203 Preliminary Watershed Study $15,D00 Subtotal Existing Facilities $8,264,394 7 OCO 2.572 1 098 3.330 6982,492 $517 (a) (b) (c) (d, g) FUTURE FACILITIES Tom Creek Sewer Phase 111 $659,126 1 DOD Town Creek Sevier Phase IV $1,000,000 MaSIW Watershed Study $15,10100 Souill Schertz System (g) $10,200.000 3.600 Subtotal Future Facilities x11,874,128 4.600 e 0.000 2,745 1 855 f $7,084,871 $11492 TOTAL COLLECTION 518.138,520 11 500 2 572 2 745 5 185 $8,057,363 51,699 (g) WASTEWATER CONSTRUCTION COST TOTAL $18,138.520 $6,067363 $1,659 I(h) (a) Source City of Schertz (b) Sdurce� City of Schertz. capac4ty adequate to serve 30,UDO (shown at average demand) (C) Proportioriate st=are of 2011 sewer service population-, see TABLE 7 (d) 2011 demand allocated propor5onate between available excess in existing facilities and future facilities (e) Source Ctty of Schertz. rapacity adequate to serve 49.DOC (show at average demand) (f) Remainder of available rapacity (g) Assumes the following gals to LUE convemron factors, based on CapaCity estimates. Collection 245 gals dally = 1 LUE (hj Wastewater treatment Canstructian assts are rletermmed by New Braunfels Utilities and Clbolo Creek Municipal Authority in add+ *.ion to casts shown and are reflected in the impact fees charged by Ihese two entilies to Schertz customers (g) South Schenz Line A. tine B. Lift Station 12 f1 IWI t CITY OF SCRERTE 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1/11) TABLE 1$ CATEGORIZATION OF EXISTING DEBT - WATER UTILITY (a) Source City of Schertz (b) Source- Table 5 -12. (c) Remaining payback determined by prorating payback among the vanous facilities funded by the bond issue (d) Totals represent one well functioning In each pressure plane, capacity analysis, Table 5.12 (e) Assume financing parameters of 5.0% interest & 20 years & bonchng costs of 3 OY over construction costs (t) Capacities for existing customer use prorated among facilities according to reiahve capacities. Ltltr2011 EXISTING BOND ISSUE FACILITY CAPACITY DEBT PAYBACK FACILITY ISSUANCE ISSUANCE REMAINING FOR EXISTING PER CURRENT NAME DATE AMOUNT PAYBACK TOTAL CUSTOMERS LUE SUPPLYIPUMPING 2001 $2,154.455 $3,063.401 0 857 6.500 S1.606 Live Oak Pump Sta S Moult Face irty Subtotal $2,154,455 $3,063,401 11839 6.500 $116 (a) (b) (C) (d) (d) GROUND STORAGE 1987 $450.000 50 1 Soo 133,11 So NW Quad Tank (ELO) Were Seguin Tank 198' 5150 000 S0 0 500 0.443 s0 Deer Haven Tank 1962 5150 coo So 0 5c0 0.443 $0 Subtotal 3750,000 s0 2 500 2 2'.6 s0 (a) (b) (c) {t; ELEVATED STORAGE 2001 51,609.170 S945,438 1.5010 1203 s52 1H 35 Tank SE Quad Tank 2005 53,200,000 $3,293,544 1.000 0.802 5183 Naco WLII Sate Tank #11 1968 S500.000 s0 0.500 0.401 0 Subtotal 55.309,170 S4.238.9,82 3 000 2 4C5 5235 a) (b) (c) f� TABLE 15 (CONTINUED) WATER TRANSMISSION 2001 51,049,375 $437,680 16" 2001 Water Mains Schirmerville Water Extension 1990 Subtotal Existing Facilities $1,262,193 $437,680 23 904 34.632 $44 (a) ,b) (C) (b) Subtotal All Transmission $1,262,193 5437,680 23 904 34.632 $44 WATER OUTSTANDING DEBT TOTAL 59,475.818 $7.740.062 5395 (a) Source City of Schertz (b) Source- Table 5 -12. (c) Remaining payback determined by prorating payback among the vanous facilities funded by the bond issue (d) Totals represent one well functioning In each pressure plane, capacity analysis, Table 5.12 (e) Assume financing parameters of 5.0% interest & 20 years & bonchng costs of 3 OY over construction costs (t) Capacities for existing customer use prorated among facilities according to reiahve capacities. Ltltr2011 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 8/1%11) TABLE 16 CATEGORIZATION OF EXISTING DEBT -WASTEWATER UTILITY WASTEWATER UTILITY FACILITY BOND ISSUE FACILITY CAPACITY EXISTING DEBT PAYBACK PER CURRENT ISSUANCE ISSUANCE REMAINING FOR EXISTING NAME DATE AMOUNT PAYBACK TOTAL CUSTOMERS LUE COLLECTION AND PUMPING Existing Line Network 1962 Existing Line Network 1982 Town Creek Sewer Pro act 2010 56.600,000 57,320.339 SuGlotal $15.600.Doo $7,32fl.339 7 00 0 735 5 5 (d) WASTEWATER OUTSTANDING DEBT TOTAL $6,600 000 $7.320339 $75 (a) SOLrce: City of SCher12 (b) 1962 funded linework amount estimated as total issuance, less 1962 water *facilities enumerated in Table 6 -1 1983 funded linework amount estimated by City of Schertz (c) Remaining payback determined by prorating payback among the various facilities funded by the bond issue (d) Source Table 5 -13 CITY OF SCHERTZ 2011 IMPACT FEE STUDY UPDATE (Amended 811%11) TABLE 17 DERIVATION OF MAXIMUM WATER AND WASTEWATER CAPITAL RECOVERY COSTS THROUGH THE EC CITY RESIDUAL MOnEL tal Fi35ume Misr. wrioing cost oT i.u7c over cor'struc on costs [cj Assume financing parameters of 5.0% interest 8 20 years E Bonding costs of 3 0% over construction costs. :.:1?u.pllc ft�artM�11'nr�iti�*er \Ca(aiCrrl 1h+pruvwrimntm P1��, �::.M •.. cre�i[9G7113Ah- :Q11,x1�j 01I;i3b 15 all 11011 FUTURE CUSTOMER TOTAL COST OF CAPITAL PER LUE LESS LESS EQUALS EXISTING EQUALS AVOIDED MAXIMUM PLUS PLUS EQUALS DEBT SERVICE ELIGIBLE BONDING 8 CAPITAL BONDING BONDING DEBT SERVICE PAYBACK fN RECOVERY INTEREST RECOVERY CONTT. SOFT INTEREST PAYBACK RATES PER COSTS PER COSTS PER COST PER ITEM COSTS COSTS Jal COSTS [bl COSTS LUE fal LUE LUE fc1 LUE WATER UTILITY 866.07 25,98 53956 1,43161 1 16.28 1,315.33 51961 79573 Supply1pumping Ground Storage 693.04 2 0.79 431 76 1,145 59 1,145.59 45255 693 G --, Elevaled Storage 526 31} 1579 32788 56998 23495 635,02 25086 384 Transmission 1.07694 3231 670.93 1.780.17 4384 1.736.33 68592 1,0504-. CIPIS;udy Costs 10.70 032 667 17.69 - 17.69 6,99 10.70 Total Water 3 3,17104 S 95,19 S 1,97680 S 5,245.03 S 395.06 S 4,849,96 S 1,91592 S 2,934.04 WASTEWATER UTILITY 1.698.91 50.97 1.05842 2.808.30 7521 273309 1,079.68 '.653.42 Major Gdlwfion CIPIStudy Costs 15.14 045 943 25.03 - 2503 9.89 15 14 GCMAINBUIGBRA FEES Total Wastewater 5 1,714 C6 $ 51,42 S 1 06785 S 283333 5 75.21 5 2,758 13 $ 1,089 57 S 1,660.56 TOTAL WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES 5 4.887 10 S 146 61 S 3 044.65 S 8.078.37 S 470.28 S 7,60808 1 S 3,00549 S 4 , 602.60 tal Fi35ume Misr. wrioing cost oT i.u7c over cor'struc on costs [cj Assume financing parameters of 5.0% interest 8 20 years E Bonding costs of 3 0% over construction costs. :.:1?u.pllc ft�artM�11'nr�iti�*er \Ca(aiCrrl 1h+pruvwrimntm P1��, �::.M •.. cre�i[9G7113Ah- :Q11,x1�j 01I;i3b 15 all 11011 APPENDIX A CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 ABERNATHY 2.839 3,105 3,329 3,480 3,554 3,565 3,494 ABILENE 115.926 124,607 130,220 132,820 133,514 130,943 126,835 ADDISON 14,166 16,000 20,534 22,358 23,629 24,515 25.133 AQUA DULCE 737 737 737 737 737 737 737 ALAMO 14,760 20.915 28,107 36,163 44,880 54,400 64,166 ALAMO HEIGHTS 7,319 7,6171 8,039 8,148 8,239 8,331 8,423 ALBANY 1,921 2,011 2,116 2,096 1,982 1,744 1,464 ALED© 1,726 2,710 5,620 9,120 12,620 13,258 13,258 ALICE 19,010 20,512 21.899 22,792 23,181 23,017 22,524 ALLEN 43,554 82,000 90,000 98,000 98,500 98,500 98,500 ALPINE 5,786 6,320 6,742 6,929 7,055 7,398 7,474 ALTO 1,190 1,290 1,404 1,502 1,592 1,681 1,786 ALTON 4,384 12,342 15.513 19,064 22,907 27,104 31.411 ALVARADO 3,288 4,204 4,627 5,071 5,556 6,158 6,897 ALVIN 21,413 23,231 25,123 26,935 28.605 30,375 32,223 ALVORD 1,007 1,336 1.478 1,615 1,751 1,906 2,085 AMARILLO 173,627 188,004 203.497 217,987 234,486 252,493 267,324 AMES 1,079 1,338 1,623 1,897 2,165 2,459 2,789 AMHERST 791 834 887 933 968 963 950 ANAHUAC 2,210 2,405 2,623 2,825 3,000 3,178 3,360 ANDREWS 9.652 10,519 11.247 11,754 12,232 12,453 12,701 ANGLETON 18,134 19,999 20,900 21,763 22,559 23,402 24,282 ANNA 1,225 9,000 14,000 21,000 28,000 36,000 60,000 ANNETTA 1,108 1,579 1,972 2,289 2,564 2.856 3,176 ANNETTA SOUTH 555 708 836 939 1,028 1,123 1.227 4/7/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 1 of 39 CITY 2040 2010 2020 2030 2044 2050 2060 ANSON 2,556 2,608 2,672 2,668 2,627 2,550 2,451 ANTHONY 3.850 4,586 5,422 6,156 6,789 7,422 8,055 ANTON 1.200 1,291 1.347 1,380 1,381 1327 1,262 ARANSAS PASS 8.138 9,851 11,663 13,337 14,792 16,101 17,304 ARCHER CITY 1,848 2,022 2,200 2,345 2,390 2,307 2,223 ARCOLA 1,048 2.500 2.750 3.025 3,328 3,661 4,026 ARGYLE 2,365 3,750 8,935 12,983 14,550 16,282 18,000 ARLINGTON 332,969 380.628 425,000 450.040 472,065 472.065 472,065 ARP 901 965 1,013 1,061 1,109 1,189 1,295 ASHERTON 1,342 1,440 1,536 1,596 1,602 1,567 1,490 ASPERMONT 1,021 1,017 985 937 877 823 771 ATHENS 11,297 13,588 16,343 19,657 23,643 28,438 34,204 ATLANTA 5,745 5,849 6,085 6,322 6,557 6,557 6,557 AUBREY 1 „500 2,830 5,375 8,755 11,767 15,814 21,252 AURORA 853 1,500 1,800 2,000 2,149 2,507 2,905 AUSTIN 656,562 799,846 967,757 1,152,891 1,323,721 1,504,304 1,643,409 AZLE 9,600 12, 108 16,795 23,473 31,060 38,682 45,362 BAILEY'S PRAIRIE 694 744 795 844 889 938 988 BAIRD 1,623 1,623 1,623 1,623 1,623 1,623 1,623 BALCH SPRINGS 19,375 21,083 22,564 23,849 24,963 25,930 26,768 BALCONES HEIGHTS 3,016 3,327 3,670 3,909 4,154 4,414 4,674 BALLINGER 4,243 4,379 4,871 5,243 5,654 5.974 6,274 BALMORHEA 527 627 730 815 885 949 1,400 BANDERA 957 1,056 1,179 1,307 1,411 1,499 1,586 BANGS 1,620 1,691 1,746 1,761 1,761 1,751 1,761 4/7/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 2 of 39 CITY REGIONAL CITY POPULATION 2000 PROJECTIONS 2010 a as PLAN FOR 2020 2000 2030 r.r 2040 2050 2060 BARDWELL 583 838 1,075 1,3018 1,546 1,813 2,107 BARTLETT 1,675 1,825 1,947 2,070 2,172 2,262 2,349 BARTONVILLE 1,093 1,500 4,500 5,000 5.000 5,000 5,000 BASTROP 5,340 81890 12,475 15,920 21,003 25,155 30,240 BAY CITY 18,667 19,921 21,292 22,126 22,586 22,586 22,586 BAYOU VISTA 1,644 1,816 1,964 2,0152 2,088 2,114 2,131 BAYTOWN 66,430 72,905 75,379 77,790 80,123 82,449 84,777 BEACH CITY 1,645 2,358 3,153 3,892 4,532 5,182 5,848 BEASLEY 590 701 815 955 1,099 1,288 1,504 BEAUMONT 113,866 113,866 113,866 113,866 113,866 113,866 113,866 BECKVILLE 752 790 8016 820 831 840 846 BEDFORD 47,152 50,001 52,395 54,407 56,098 57,519 58,713 BEE CAVE VILLAGE 656 2,264 2,727 3,181 3,592 3,891 4,191 BEEV ILLE 13,129 13,916 14,646 15,092 15,252 15,255 14,885 BELLAIRE 15,642 17,272 18,859 20,420 21,965 23,500 25,029 BELLMEAD 9,214 9,875 10,541 11,102 11,684 12,054 12,591 BELLS 1,190 1,400 2,100 2,750 3,2501 3,700 4,000 BELLVILLE 3,794 5,213 6,560 7,499 8,057 8,325 8,692 BELTON 14,623 17,633 20,399 22,914 24,617 25,815 26,116 BENAVIDES 1,686 1,784 1,867 1,912 1,925 1,872 1,776 BENBROOK 20,208 24,000 27,000 30,000 36,000 43,000 51,000 BERRYVI LLE 891 977 1,071 1,164 1,259 1,375 1,521 BERTRAM 1,122 1,430 1,859 2,327 2,781 3,048 3,342 BEVERLY HILLS 2,113 2,162 2,211 2,253 2,296 2,323 2,363 BEVIL OAKS 1,346 1,346 1,346 1,346 1,346 1,346 1,346 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 3 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 BIG LAKE 2,885 3,288 3,628 3,800 3,788 3,654 3,478 BIG SANDY 1,288 1,365 1,443 1,496 1,529 1,555 1,589 BIG SPRING 25,233 25,944 26,592 26,803 26,803 26,803 26,803 BIG WELLS 704 755 806 837 840 822 782 BISHOP 3,305 3,305 3,305 3,305 3,305 3,305 3,305 BLANCO 1.505 2,430 2,872 3,295 3,665 3,990 4,372 BLOOMING GROVE 833 897 897 897 897 897 897 BLOSSOM 1,439 1,558 1,677 1,789 1 .900 1.900 1,900 SLUE MOUND 2,388 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 BLUE RIDGE 672 2,000 4,000 7,000 11,000 16,000 18,000 BOERNE 6,178 8,600 12,208 16,065 19,286 21,925 24,506 BOGATA 1,396 1,390 1,390 1,390 1,390 1,390 1,390 BONHAM 9,990 11,516 12,603 16,000 22,000 30,000 37,000 BOOKER 1,315 1,327 1,354 1,314 1,276 1,259 1,198 BORGER 14,302 14,580 14,780 14,574 14,096 13,314 12,641 BOVINA 1,874 1,991 2,115 2,168 2,183 2,114 1,997 BOWIE 5.219 5,305 5,389 5.423 5,436 5,440 5,449 BOYD 1,099 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 3,500 3,500 BRACKETTVILLE 1,876 1,893 1,914 1,933 1,952 1,965 1,91;8 BRADY 5,523 5,593 51689 5,689 5,689 5,689 5,689 BRAZORIA 2,787 3,0+61 3,127 3,189 3,246 3,307 3,370 BRECKE.NRIDGE 5,868 5,989 6,084 6,128 6,069 5,838 5,654 BREMOND 876 876 876 876 876 876 876 BRENHAM 13,507 14,313 15,306 15,940 16,285 16,594 16,844 BRIARCLIFF VILLAGE 895 1,289 1.553 1,811 2,045 2,215 2,386 4/712011 1:11:22 PM Page 4 of 39 CITY 2011 REGIONAL POPULATION 2000 PROJECTIONS 2090 - - • ' 2020 2000 - 2060 2030 2040 2050 2060 BRIDGE CITY 8,651 9,264 9,681 9,851 9,924 10,075 10,184 BRIDGEPORT 4,309 5,900 8,352 12,001 14,296 16,657 19,936 BRONTE VILLAGE 1,076 1,065 1,140 1,140 1,140 1,140 1,140 BROOKSHIRE 3,450 4,616 5,997 7,535 9,246 11,284 13,624 BROOKSIDE VILLAGE 1,960 2,282 2,618 2,939 3,235 3,549 3,877 BROWNFIELD 9,488 10,263 10,988 11,676 12,348 12,417 12,348 BROWNSBORO 796 949 1,115 1,279 1,447 1,652 1,910 BROWNSVILLE 139,722 180,444 218,268 257,460 296,637 335,947 373,453 BROWNWOOD 18,813 20,703 21,376 21,563 21,563 21,563 21,563 BRUCEVILLE -EDDY 1,490 1,804 2,120 2,387 2,663 2,839 3,094 BRYAN 65,660 74,650 84,038 92,672 99,339 107,239 109,881 BRYSON 528 542 559 570 570 570 574 BUDA 2,404 9,338 13,971 17,341 20,728 24,797 27,997 BUFFALO 1,804 2,074 2,345 2,506 2,516 2,501 2,521 BULLARD 1,150 1,338 1,479 1,619 1,759 1,994 2,304 BULVERDE CITY 3,761 6,098 13,649 19,968 26,156 32,570 39,4618 BUNKER HILL VILLAGE 3,654 3,750 3,750 3,750 3,750 3,750 3,750 BURKBURNETT 10,927 11,465 11,949 12,269 12,436 12,553 12,647 BURLESON 20,976 32,091 48,255 60,336 61,782 63,517 65,567 BURNET 4,735 6,358 8,263 10,341 12.360 13,549 14,856 BYERS 517 534 550 546 524 491 459 CACTUS 2,538 2,600 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 CADDO MILLS 1,149 1,192 1,2610 1,352 1,498 1,819 2,318 CALDWELL 3,:449 3,638 3,844 3,993 4,108 4,192 4.266 CALVERT 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426 1,426 417/2011 1.11:22 PM Page 5 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2054 2060 CAMERON 5,634 6,231 6,900 7.331 7,596 7,663 7,693 CAMP WOOD 822 826 839 821 807 828 845 CAMPBELL 734 761 804 862 954 1,156 1.470 CANADIAN 2,233 2,330 2,340 2,262 2,178 2,120 2,015 CANTON 3,292 3,537 3,795 4.012 4,175 4,382 4,613 CANYON 12,875 14,227 15,684 17.047 18.599 20,293 21,695 CARRVO SPRINGS 5,655 6,068 6,474 6,725 6,751 6,603 6,279 CARROLLTON 109,576 121,000 124,000 128,500 131,320 133,450 134,800 CARTHAGE 6,664 7,000 7,146 7,263 7,362 7,444 7,497 CASTLE HILLS 4,202 4.207 4 211 4,215 4,218 4,221 4,223 CASTROVILLE 2,664 2,974 3,316 3,536 3,912 4,180 4,421 CEDAR HILL 32,093 46,255 66,728 78,085 81,622 81,622 81,622 CEDAR PARK 26,049 59,587 83,163 90,726 110,215 110,526 110,846 CELESTE 817 861 932 1,028 1,180 1,513 2,031 CELINA 1,861 5,000 25,414 53,798 95,267 145,702 168,118 CENTER 5,678 5,974 6,363 6,66+8 6,896 7,092 7,306 CENTERVILLE 903 1,002 1,101 1,160 1,164 1,158 1,165 CHANDLER 2,099 2,385 2,695 3,001 3,314 3,696 4,179 CHARLOTTE 1,637 1,764 1,895 2,010 2,101 2,178 2,234 CHICO 947 1,300 1,500 1,800 2,200 2,700 3,300 CHIL'DRESS 6,778 6,918 7,033 7,132 7,167 7,170 6,987 CHILLICOTHE 798 796 795 791 786 780 769 CHINA 1,112 1,096 1,072 1,051 1,035 1,018 987 CHINA GROVE 1,247 1,671 2,072 2,430 2,721 2,982 3,214 CIBOLO 3,035 4,497 6,284 8,216 10,146 12,287 14,593 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 6 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2450 2060 Cisco 3,851 3,859 3,869 3,801 3,697 3,576 3,415 CLARENDON 1,974 1 ,974 1,974 1,974 1 ,974 1,974 1 ,974 CLARKSVILLE 3,883 3,866 3,866 3,866 3,866 3.888 3,866 CLARKSVILLE CITY 806 903 1,003 1,107 1,227 1,389 1,621 CLAUDE 1,313 1.327 1,369 1,322 1,268 1,255 1,219 CLEAR LAKE SHORES 1,205 1,263 1,313 1,343 1,355 1,364 1,370 CLEBURNE 26,005 30,572 34,467 38,558 43,027 48,353 52,812 CLEVELAND 7,605 7,930 8,288 8,631 8,967 9,336 9,749 CLIFTON 3,542 3,980 4,450 4,780 4.904 4.955 5,016 CLINT 980 980 980 980 980 980 980 CLUTE 10,424 11,217 12,043 12,834 13,563 14,335 15,141 CLYDE 3,344 3,733 3,787 3,706 3,615 3,514 3,430 COAHOMA 932 958 982 990 990 990 990 COCKRELL HILL 4,443 4,782 4,947 5,028 5,067 5,086 5.095 COLDSPRING 691 826 958 1,064 1,130 1,168 1,186 COLEMAN 5,127 5,075 5.079 5,079 5,079 5,079 5,079 COLLEGE STATION 67,890 80,920 94,526 107,040 116,703 128,152 131,981 COLLEYVILLE 19,536 24,500 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 28,000 COLLINSVILLE 1,235 2,035 2,835 3,635 4,435 5,235 6,035 COLMESNEIL 638 756 872 946 974 974 974 COLORADO CITY 4,281 4.298 4.288 4,213 4,119 4,003 3,761 COLUMBUS 3,916 4,053 4,398 4,578 4,580 4,763 4,986 COMANCHE 4,482 4,561 4,704 4,749 4,734 4,634 4,488 COMBES 2,553 3,089 3,655 4,240 4,823 5,407 5,962 COMBINE 1,788 2.393 2,969 3,474 4,019 4,702 5,563 417!2011 1 :11:22 PM Page 7 of 39 CFrY REGIONAL CITY POPULATION 2008 PROJECTIONS 2010 WATER w ■ FOR 2020 2000 - 2060 2030 2040 2050 2060 COMMERCE 7,669 8,116 8,825 9,785 11,310 14,659 19,860 COMO 621 698 775 835 884 884 884 CONROE 36,811 59,845 78,924 102,013 127,459 161,024 200,007 CONVERSE 11,508 15,339 19,445 23,204 26,132 28,697 30,892 COOLIDGE 848 957 1,096 1,172 1,230 1,287 1,362 COOPER 2,150 2,312 2,520 2,722 2,924 2,924 2,924 GOPP'ELL 35,958 40,415 40,577 40,715 40,832 40,932 41,016 COPPER CANYON 1,216 1,300 1,+600 1,900 2,200 2,500 2,800 COPPERAS COVE 29,592 34,975 41.186 47,217 51,486 55,212 58,205 CORINTH 11,325 21,032 24,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 31,500 CORPUS CHRISTI 277,450 316,058 356,123 391,077 421,761 448,879 470,523 CORRIGAN 1,721 2,232 2,720 3,132 3,409 3,580 3,759 CORSICANA 24,485 27,132 28,340 29,598 30,964 32,594 34,597 COTTONWOOD SHORES 877 1,229 2,585 4,105 5,830 7,812 10,114 COTULLA 3,614 4,052 4,408 4,598 4,790 4,989 5,188 CRAN ❑ALL 2,774 4,373 5,933 7,537 9,314 11,515 14,245 CRANE 3,191 3,438 3,710 3,857 3,969 4,089 4,216 CRAWFOR© 705 761 817 864 913 944 989 CRESSON 0 776 947 1,156 1,411 1,722 2,102 CROCKETT 7,141 7,376 7,563 7,866 8,180 8,507 8,848 CROSSYTON 1,874 2,035 2,166 2,256 2,347 2,351 2,314 CROSS PLAINS 1,068 1,068 109 1,068 1,067 1,066 1,065 CROSS ROADS 602 1,500 3,800 3.800 3,800 3,800 3,800 CROWELL 1,141 1,137 1,145 1,121 1,089 1,055 1,017 CROWLEY 7,467 11,023 13,473 17,147 23,271 28,170 30,620 41712011 1;11:22 PM Page 8 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 CRYSTAL CITY 7,190 7,514 7,713 8.046 8,118 8,192 8,266 CUERO 6.571 6,718 6,883 6,977 7,007 6,902 6.779 CUMBY 616 692 768 827 877 877 877 GUSHING 637 683 730 774 823 915 1,012 CUT AND SHOOT 1,158 1,515 1,733 2,159 2,655 3,309 4,068 DAINGERPIELD 2,517 2,515 2,515 2,515 2,515 2,515 2,515 DAISETTA 1,034 1,078 1,127 1,173 1,219 1,268 1,324 DALHART 7,237 7,782 8,272 8,570 8,651 8,493 8,087 DALLAS 1,188.580 1.312,324 1,415,000 1,495,000 1,598,223 1,764.681 2,058,767 DALWORTHINGTON GARDENS 2.186 2.467 2,650 2,771 2,850 2,902 2,935 DANBURY 1,611 1.747 11888 2,023 2,148 2,280 2,418 DAWSON 852 909 971 1.036 1,106 1,190 1,293 DAYTON 5,709 7,491 9,454 11,336 13,180 15,201 17,467 DE KALB 1,769 1,920 2.049 2.147 2,246 2.246 2,246 DE LEON 2,433 2,476 2,554 2,578 2.570 2,516 2.438 DE SOTO 37,646 47,649 57,243 65,849 73,881 82,923 85,400 DECATUR 5,201 6,804 8,508 11,738 15,253 19,751 23,225 DECORDOVA 0 3,074 3,125 3,177 3,230 3,283 3,337 DEER PARK 28,520 29,513 30,480 31,432 32.374 33,309 34,241 DEL RIO 33,867 37,024 40,050 42,869 45,270 47,024 48,289 DENISON 22,773 25,000 28,000 30.000 31,000 32,000 33,000 DENTON 80,537 120,726 173,980 229,964 295,000 363,586 498,488 DENVER CITY 3,985 4,454 4,880 5,154 5,446 5,300 5,120 DEPORT 718 773 828 879 931 931 931 DETROIT 776 773 773 773 773 773 773 4/7/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 9 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2056 2060 DEVINE 4,140 4,270 4,414 4,548 4,664 4,777 4,878 DIBOLL 5,470 6,449 7,654 9,137 11,007 13,574 16.976 DICKINSON 17,093 19,955 22,425 23„888 24,480 24,921 25,208 DILLEY 3,674 4,389 5,091 5,688 6,184 6,544 6,731 DIMMITT 4,375 4,790 5,155 5,399 5,591 5,580 5,482 DONNA 14,768 17.830 20,419 23,311 26,435 29,839 33.325 DOUBLE OAK 2,179 3.000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 DRIPPING SPRINGS 1,548 5,325 9,308 11,651 14,605 16.834 19.058 DRISCOLL 825 1,090 1,364 1,603 1,813 1,999 2147 DUBLIN 3,754 4,167 4,611 5,011 5,413 6,479 7,149 DUMAS 13,747 14,884 16,123 17,216 18,084 18,613 18.931 DUNCANVILLE 36,081 37,100 37,100 37,100 37,100 37,100 37,100 EAGLE LAKE 3,664 3,792 4,116 4,284 4,285 4,456 4,665 EAGLE PASS 22,413 26.160 28,212 30,238 32,116 33,937 35,559 EARLY 2,588 2,701 2,789 2,814 2,814 2,814 2,814 EARTH 1,109 1,170 1.244 1,308 1,357 1.350 1,332 EAST BERNARD 0 2,428 2,567 2,656 2,7017 2.708 2,680 EAST MOUNTAIN 580 1,110 1,152 1,242 1,338 1,410 1,482 EAST TAWAKONI 775 886 1,011 1,135 1,259 1,384 1,509 EASTLAND 3,769 4,017 4,028 3,957 3,849 3.723 3,555 EASTON 524 645 767 884 1,010 1,190 1,465 ECTOR 600 652 691 720 741 763 786 EDCOUCH 3,342 4,076 4,659 5,311 6,013 6,778 7,562 EDEN 2,561 2,885 2,988 2,988 2,988 2,988 2,988 EDGECLIFF 2,550 2,550 2,550 2,550 2,550 2,550 2,550 41712411 1:11:22 PM Page 10 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 EDGEWOOD 1,348 1,394 1,442 1,483 1,513 1,552 1,595 EDINBURG 48,465 71,940 92,789 115,092 141,263 168,699 196,813 EDNA 5,899 6,331 6,773 7,048 7,206 7,266 7,267 EL CAMPO 10,945 11,575 12,236 12,662 12,906 12,912 12,775 EL CENIZO 3,545 5,929 8,729 11,865 15,315 19.085 23,068 EL LAGO 3,075 3,075 3,075 3,075 3,075 3,075 3,075 EL PASO 566,858 637,481 717,651 788,014 848,699 909,384 970,069 ELDORADO 1,951 2,228 2,510 2,639 2,691 2,7661 2,845 ELECTRA 3,168 3,206 3,240 3,263 3,275 3,283 3,290 ELGIN 5,700 10,084 14,133 18,025 23,758 28.437 34,167 ELKHART 1,215 1,309 1,383 1,438 1,496 1,541 1,579 ELMENDORF 664 773 876 968 1,042 1,109 1,168 ELSA 5,549 6,.267 6,710 7,204 7,736 8,313 8,904 EMORY 1,021 1,228 1,401 1,573 1,745 1,918 2,091 ENCINAL 629 639 648 656 664 670 675 ENNIS 16.045 20,539 26,290 33,655 43,081 55,148 70.596 EULESS 46,005 53,446 60,416 63,854 65,550 66,386 66,798 EUSTACE 798 865 865 865 865 865 865 EVERMAN 5,836 6,200 6,600 6,600 6.600 6,600 6,600 FAIRCHILDS 678 929 1,189 1,507 1,834 2,263 2,754 FAIRFIELD 3,094 3,700 4,500 5,300 6,100 6,9010 7,500 FAIROAKS RANCH 4,695 6,181 6,271 6,339 6,408 6,451 6,504 FAIRVIEW 2,644 9,300 10,800 13,600 18.000 18,000 18,000 FALFURRIAS 5,297 6,981 8,316 9,310 9,924 10,178 10,215 FALLS CITY 591 644 706 772 825 857 875 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 11 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 FARMERS BRANCH 27,508 30,470 33,161 35,608 37,833 39,855 41,693 FARMERSVILLE 3,118 3,683 7,000 10,000 15,000 22,000 30,000 FARWELL 1,364 1,449 1,539 1,578 1,589 1.539 1,454 FATE 0 6,222 12.007 15,062 17,923 19,997 21,379 FERRIS 2,175 2,631 3,000 3,400 3,900 4,500 5,000 FLATONIA 1,377 1,543 1,712 1,851 1,959 2,083 2,247 FLORENCE 1,054 1,364 1,632 1,951 2,298 2,675 3,079 FLORESVILLE 5,868 9,000 10,261 11,653 12,999 14,402 15,846 FLOWER MOUND 50.702 66,667 75.555 93,000 93,000 93,000 93.000 FLOYDADA 3,676 3,866 4,059 4,126 4,159 4,017 3,809 FOREST HILL 12,949 12,000 13,090 14,210 15,392 16,738 17,574 FORNEY 5,588 13,000 24,000 30,000 35,000 39,000 42,803 FORT BLISS 8.264 21,000 27,630 27,630 27,630 27,630 27,630 FORT DAVIS 1,050 1,700 2.000 2,200 2,400 2,600 2,800 FORT HOOD 33,711 33,711 33,711 33.711 33,711 33,711 33,711 FORT STOCKTON 7,846 8,332 8,766 9,009 9,139 9,163 8,984 FORT WORTH 534,694 742,597 950,587 1,181,683 1,454,650 1,773,210 2,161,533 FRANKLIN 1,470 1,592 1,754 1,856 1,925 1,934 1,927 FRANKSTON 1,209 1,303 1,376 1,431 1,488 1,533 1,571 FREDERICKSBURG 8,911 11,482 13,385 14,365 14,365 14,365 14,365 FREEPORT 12,708 15,794 19,006 22,082 24,917 27,922 31,059 FREER 3,241 3,429 3,589 3,676 3,699 3,598 3,414 FRIENDSWOOD 29.037 32,353 35,215 36,910 37,596 38.107 38,439 FRIONA 3,854 4,094 4,349 4,458 4,489 4,348 4,107 FRISCO 33,714 108,671 148,000 197,000 246,000 280,000 280,000 417 {2011 1:11:22 PM Page 12 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 FRITOH 2,235 2,290 2,334 2,313 2,248 2,131 2,030 FROST 648 550 550 550 550 550 550 FULSHEAR 716 1,098 1,401 1,772 2,154 2,654 3,226 FULTON 1,553 1,854 2,113 2,248 2,223 2,100 1,987 GAINESVILLE 15,538 16,800 19,000 21,400 23,900 26,400 29,000 GALENA PART. 10,592 11,099 11,592 12,077 12,557 13,034 13,510 GALVESTON 57,247 57,247 57,247 57,247 57,247 57,247 57,247 GANADO 1,915 2,081 2,251 2,357 2,418 2,441 2,441 GARDEN RIDGE 1,882 2,380 3,017 3,743 4,454 5,191 5,983 GARLAND 215,768 232,685 234,650 241,767 243,000 243,000 243,000 GARRISON 844 844 844 844 844 844 844 GATESVILLE 15,591 19,637 24,312 28,866 32,088 34,908 37,177 GEORGE WEST 2,524 2,816 3,061 3,155 3,079 2,831 2,548 GEORGETOWN 28,339 49,112 66,987 88,239 111,348 136,489 163,453 GHOLSON 922 1,095 1,270 1,417 1,569 1,666 1,807 GIDDINGS 5,105 5,875 6,804 7,569 8,187 8,725 9,180 GILMER 4,799 5,941D 6,390 6,763 7,029 7,248 7,467 GLADEWATER 6.078 6,239 6,402 6,522 6,610 6,686 6,776 GLEN ROSE 2,122 2,672 3,009 3,287 3,469 3,543 3,568 GLENN HEIGHTS 7,224 11,423 13,833 16,516 19,102 21,705 24,332 GODLEY 879 1,136 1,439 1,757 2,105 2,536 3,065 GOLDTHWAITE 1,802 1,799 1,988 2,032 2,032 2,032 2,032 GOLIAD 1,975 2,306 2,710 3,035 3,248 3,411 3,514 GONZALES 7,202 7,792 8,435 8,925 9,277 9,379 9,347 GORMAN 1,236 1,239 1,242 1,220 1,187 1,148 1,096 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 13 of 39 cmr 2000 2010 2620 2030 2040 2050 2060 GRAFORD 578 594 513 629 645 664 686 GRAHAM 8,716 8,800 8,993 9,006 8,903 8,772 8,690 GRANBURY 5,718 8.073 10,083 11,954 13,914 16,383 19,234 GRAND PRAIRIE 127,427 170,000 196,000 231,011 260,015 290,520 290,520 GRAND SALINE 3.028 3,312 3,611 3,863 4,052 4,292 4,560 GRANDVIEW 1.358 1,600 2,000 2,500 2,500 2,500 2,500 GRANGER 1,299 1,561 1,695 1,854 2,027 2,215 2,417 GRANITE SHOALS 2,040 2,738 3,559 4,454 5,324 5,836 6,399 GRAPELAN D 1.451 1,499 1,536 1,599 1,662 1,729 1,798 GRAPEVINE 42,059 51,352 55,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 60,000 GREENVILLE 23,960 24,431 25,178 26,189 27,796 31,324 36,802 GREGORY 2,318 2,318 2,318 2,318 2,318 2,318 2,318 GROESBECK 4,291 5,303 6,595 7,299 7,838 8,373 9,068 GROOM 587 589 595 591 572 520 472 GROVES 1 5,733 15,733 1 5,733 15,733 1 5,733 15,733 1 5,733 GROVETON 1,107 1,234 1,332 1,364 1,348 1,293 1,245 GRUVER 1,162 1,169 1,178 1,186 1,195 1,200 1,204 GUN BARREL CITY 5.145 6,131 7,201 8,256 9,338 10,658 12,324 GUNTER 1,230 2,000 3,500 5,000 6,500 8,000 9,000 HACKBERRY 544 1,086 1,619 2,120 2,361 2,477 2,533 HALE CENTER 2,263 2,439 2,603 2,722 2,795 2,779 2,725 HALLETTSVILLE 2,345 2,603 2,614 2,901 3,409 3,998 4,673 HALLSBURG 518 569 621 664 709 738 780 HALLSVILLE 2,772 3,334 3,890 4,292 4,595 4,950 5,472 HALTOM CITY 39,018 41,000 50,322 53,058 54,428 55,113 55,456 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 14 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 HAMILTON 2,977 2,942 2,933 2,926 2,928 2,919 2.918 HAMLIN 2,248 2,294 2,350 2,346 2,311 2,243 2,156 HAPPY 647 707 765 813 856 883 885 HARDI N 755 885 1,028 1,165 1,299 1,446 1,611 HARKER HEIGHTS 17,308 23.869 30,952 36,978 42.090 43,640 44,407 HARLINGEN 57,564 69,214 79,581 90,333 101,090 111,896 122,218 HART 1,198 1,312 1,412 1,478 1,531 1,528 1,501 HASKELL 3,106 3,024 2,982 2,925 2,895 2,842 2,752 HASLET 1.134 2,000 4,000 7.000 7,0100 7,000 7,000 HAWKINS 1,331 1,547 1,746 1,856 1,867 1,867 1,867 HAWLEY 646 659 675 674 664 645 620 HEARNE 4,690 4,690 4,690 4,690 4,690 4,690 4,690 HEATH 4,149 6,971 9,857 12,362 15,058 18,238 21,968 HEBBRONVILLE 4,498 4,764 5,098 5,354 5.569 5,509 5.302 HEBRON 874 500 500 500 500 500 500 HEDWIG VILLAGE 2,334 2,334 2,334 2,334 2,334 2,334 2,334 HELOTES 4,285 7,980 11,812 14,808 17,244 19,432 21,378 HEMPH ILL 1,105 1,192 1,241 1,278 1,316 1,356 1,396 HEMPSTEAD 4,691 7,389 10,585 14,143 18,102 22,817 28,232 HENDERSON 11,273 11,358 11,438 11,484 11,506 11,570 11,726 HENRIETTA 3,264 3,374 3,470 3,448 3,306 3,103 2,900 HEREFORD 14,597 15.090 15,628 16,099 16,495 16,636 16,665 HEWITT 11,085 12,667 14,262 15,606 16,999 17,884 19,170 HICKORY CREEK 2,078 4,150 5,600 6,500 7.941 7,941 7,941 HICO 1,341 1,417 1,417 1,417 1,417 1,417 1,417 4!712011 1 :11:22 PIN Page 15 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 HIDALGO 7.322 11,675 16,240 21,350 26,875 32,905 39,089 HIGHLAND PARK 8,842 8,937 9,025 9,106 9,181 9,249 9,313 HIGHLAND VILLAGE 12,173 15,148 16,868 17,862 18,000 18,000 18,000 HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE 1,028 1,028 1,028 1,028 1,028 1,028 1,028 HILLCREST 722 744 767 789 810 832 855 HILLSBORO 8,232 8,923 9,284 9,692 10,099 10,534 11,017 HILSHIRE VILLAGE 720 770 770 770 770 770 770 HITCHCOCK 6,386 6,660 6.897 7,037 7,094 7,136 7.163 HOLIDAY LAKES 1,095 1,141 1,189 1,235 1,278 1,323 1,370 HOLLAND 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 1,102 HOLLIDAY 1,632 1,786 1,943 2,071 2,110 2,038 1,963 HOLLYWOOD PARK 2,983 3,111 3,232 3,340 3,428 3,507 3,577 HONDO 7,897 9,050 10,324 11,513 12,541 13,540 14,437 HONEY GROVE 1.746 1,858 2,100 2,500 3,000 3,500 4,000 HOOKS 2,973 3,228 3,442 3,609 3,775 3,775 3,775 HOUSTON 1,953,631 2,240,974 2,520,926 2,798,278 3,073,268 3,349,540 3,626,591 HOWE 2,478 3,000 4,500 6,500 8,500 9,772 10,781 HUBBARD 1,586 1,713 1,713 1,713 1,713 1,713 1,713 HUDSON 3,792 5,021 6,635 8,398 10,747 13,971 18,243 HUDSON OAKS 1,637 2,000 2,438 2,972 3,500 4,000 4,500 HUGHES SPRINGS 1,856 1,890 1,965 2,041 2,117 2,117 2,117 HUMBLE 14,579 16,862 19.085 21,272 23,436 25,587 27,730 HUNTERS CREEK VILLAGE 4,374 4,755 5,126 5,491 5,852 6,211 6,568 HUNTINGTON 2,068 2,306 2,598 2,958 3,412 4,035 4,861 HUNTSVILLE 35,078 42,888 52,424 54,405 54,405 54,405 54,405 4/7/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 16 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 H URST 36,273 38,829 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 41,000 HUTCHINS 2,805 3,200 4,000 5,000 6.500 8,500 14,000 HUTTO 1,250 12,479 17.153 22,709 28,750 35,317 42,363 IDALOU 2,157 2,226 2,275 2,301 2,305 2,324 2,310 INDIAN LAKE 541 699 866 1,039 1,211 1,383 1,547 INGLESIDE 9,388 15,003 21,080 26,933 32,327 37,402 42,090 INGLESIDE ON THE BAY 659 857 1,071 1,277 1,467 1.646 1,811 INGRAM 1,740 1,963 2,188 2,295 2,219 2.081 1,963 IOWA COLONY 804 911 1 „022 1,129 1,227 1,331 1,440 IOWA PARK 6,431 6,678 6,900 7,047 7.124 7,178 7,221 I RAAN 1,238 1,315 1,383 1,421 1,442 1,446 1,417 IRVING 191,615 219,238 240,099 255,853 267,751 276,736 283,521 ITALY 1,993 2,376 2,731 3,081 3,438 3,838 4,279 ITASCA 1,503 1,633 1,626 1,619 1,612 1,604 1,595 JACINTO CITY 10,302 11,171 12,017 12,.849 13,673 14,492 15,308 JACKSBORO 4,533 4,650 4,798 4,897 4,897 4,897 4,897 JACKSONVILLE 13,868 14,543 15,316 15,978 16,587 17,191 17,904 JAMAICA BEACH 1,075 1,314 1,520 1,642 1,691 1,728 1,752 JARRELL 0 1,433 1,474 1,517 1,561 1,606 1,652 JASPER 7,657 8,315 8,883 9.218 9,303 9,303 9,303 JAYTON 513 501 489 434 352 310 270 JEFFERSON 2,024 2,089 2,113 2,113 2,113 2,113 2,113 JERSEY VILLAGE 6,880 8,742 10,555 12,338 14,103 15,857 17,604 J EWETT 861 1,071 1,281 1,405 1,413 1,401 1,417 JOAQUIN 925 974 1,038 1,088 1,126 1,158 1,193 41712011 111:22 PM Page 17 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 JOHNSON CITY 1,191 1,616 1,910 2,191 2,437 2,653 2.907 JONES CREEK 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130 2,130 JONESTOWN 1,681 3,309 3,985 4,648 5,249 5,686 6,123 JOSEPHINE 594 941 1,262 1 ,514 1,820 2,119 2,449 JOSHUA 4,528 5,503 6,247 7,028 7,881 8,940 10,239 JOURDANTON 3,732 4,134 4,549 4,914 5,201 5,443 5,620 JUNCTION 2,618 2,731 2,755 2,755 2,755 2,755 2,755 ,JUSTIN 1,891 3,177 5,252 8,474 13,926 17,000 18,759 KARNES CITY 3,457 3.710 4,008 4,322 4,573 4,728 4,812 KATY 11,775 20,304 25,751 31,334 36,991 43,013 49,314 KAUFMAN 6,490 8,256 10,864 13,020 14,753 16,484 19,883 KEENE 5,003 5,882 6,917 8,004 9,192 10,666 12,474 KELLER 27,345 40,127 45,026 51,310 51,310 51,310 51,310 KEMAH 2,330 2,985 3,550 3,885 4,021 4,122 4,188 KEMP 1.133 1,400 1.700 2,000 2,000 2,000 2,000 KEMPNER 1,004 1,286 1,584 1,800 1,960 2,065 2,131 KENDLETON 0 601 775 1,000 1,290 1,664 2,147 KENEDY 3,487 3.585 3,965 4,266 4,522 4,793 4,950 KENEFIGK 667 824 997 1,163 1,3225 1,503 1,702 KENNEDAL.F 5,850 7,000 9,064 10,114 10,824 11,303 11,626 KERENS KERMIT 1,681 5,714 1,937 6,057 1,937 6,338 1,937 6,391 1,937 6,405 1,937 6,285 1,937 +6,084 KERRVILLE 20,425 23,044 25.681 26,934 27,544 28,926 29.545 K I LGOR E 11,301 11,823 12.363 12,921 13,567 14,442 1 5,693 KILLEEN 85,911 113,217 126,985 141,148 154,641 169,132 184,064 4RI2011 1:11:22 PM Page 18 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 KINGSVILLE 25.575 26,844 27,756 28,347 28,727 29.226 29,248 KIRBY 8,573 9,066 9.437 9,768 10.037 10,279 10,494 KIRBYVILLE 2,085 2,251 2,395 2,480 2,501 2.501 2.501 KNOX CITY 1,219 1,198 1,239 1,241 1,245 1.243 1,225 KQSSE 0 500 503 506 509 512 515 KOUNTZE 2,115 2,398 2,501 2.693 2,788 2,887 2,990 KRESS 826 865 897 920 929 912 873 KRUGERVILLE 903 1,672 1,918 2,228 2,900 3.783 5,422 KRUM 1,979 4,200 4,600 5,000 5,500 6,200 7,000 KYLE 5,314 21,457 31,126 33,613 35,203 39,197 41,850 LA FERIA 6,115 7,954 9,898 11,908 13,912 15,916 17,822 LA GRANGE 4,478 5,546 6,629 7,520 8,213 9,007 10,057 LA GRULLA 1.211 1,640 1,746 1,862 1,985 2,115 2,249 LA JDYA 3,303 4,312 5,167 6,122 7,154 8,278 9,428 LA MARQUE 13.682 13,682 13,582 13,582 13,682 13,682 13,682 LA PORTE 31,880 35,467 38,960 42,394 45,794 49,173 52,539 LA VERNIA 931 1,280 1,715 2,194 2,659 3,143 3,645 LA VILLA 1,305 1,361 1,374 1,389 1,405 1,422 1,439 LACKLAND AFB 7,123 7,123 7,123 7,123 7,123 7,123 7 „123 LACOSTE 1,255 1,399 1,558 1,706 1,834 11958 2.070 LACY- LAKEVIEW 5,764 7.380 9.009 10.382 11,805 12,709 14.023 LADONIA 667 800 1,600 2,000 2,200 2,500 3,000 LAGO VISTA 4,507 6,907 8,320 9,703 10,959 11,871 12,784 LAGUNA VISTA 1,658 2,651 3,314 4,008 4,705 5,413 6,094 LAKE CITY 526 619 719 816 905 989 1,066 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 19 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 LAKE DALLAS 6,166 7,902 9,102 9,933 9,933 9.933 9,933 LAKE ,JACKSON 26,386 29,383 32,502 35,488 38,241 41,159 44,205 LAKE TANGLEWOOD 825 993 1,174 1,344 1,537 1,748 1,923 LAKE WORTH 4,618 4,854 5,400 6.000 6,600 7,200 7,500 LAKEPORT 861 1,031 1,207 1,389 1,600 1,885 2,293 LAKESIDE 1,040 1,252 1,451 1,655 1,871 2,130 2,436 LAKESIDE CITY 984 1,077 1,172 1,249 1,272 1,228 1,183 LAKEWAY 8,002 14,522 17,493 20,400 23,040 24,957 26,877 LAM ESA 9,952 10,309 10,633 10,906 11,068 10,804 10.395 LAMPASAS 6,786 8,222 9,225 9,952 10,491 10,845 10,325 LANCASTER 25,894 38,000 59,664 65,301 65,301 65.301 65,301 LAREDO 176,576 234,423 302,377 378,468 462,176 553,670 650,317 LAUGHLIN AFB 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 2,225 LEAGUE CITY 45,444 53,583 60.577 64,722 66,402 67,654 68,470 LEANDER 7,596 22,675 31,803 42,654 54,454 67,291 81,059 LEARY 555 603 643 674 705 705 705 LEFORS 559 545 540 525 505 474 444 LEON VALLEY - - 9,239 9.284 9,329 9,456 9,583 9,710 9,837 LEONARD 1,846 2,149 2,502 3,500 5,500 8,000 10,000 LEVELLAN D 12,866 13,838 14,440 14,791 14,806 14,233 13,534 LEWISVILLE 77,737 97,709 110,002 122,002 136,002 155,002 176,515 LEXINGTON 1,178 1,349 1,556 1,726 1,863 1,983 2,084 LIBERTY 8.033 8,265 8,520 8,765 9,005 9,268 9,563 LIBERTY HILL 1,409 2,440 3,663 5.117 6,698 8,418 10.263 LINCOLN PARK 517 680 835 990 1,145 1,300 1,560 41712011 1:11:22 PM Page 20 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 LINDALE 2,954 3,724 4,300 4,874 5,446 6,409 7,683 LINDEN 2,256 2,297 2,390 2,482 2,575 2,575 2,575 LINDSAY 788 879 943 976 981 981 981 LIPAN 0 599 844 1,189 1,675 2,359 3,323 LITTLE ELM 3,646 24,000 29,250 35,6510 40,371 40,371 40,371 LITTLE RIVER- ACADEMY 1,645 1,793 1,896 1,989 2,049 2,088 2,116 LITTLEFIELD 6,507 6,864 7,299 7,678 7,961 7,919 7,816 LIVE OAK 9,156 9,641 10,126 10,611 11,096 11,581 12,066 LIVINGSTON 5,433 6,740 8,425 9,061 9,829 10,539 11,232 LLANO 3,325 3,967 4,288 4,375 4,461 4,547 4,633 LOCKHART 11,615 16,328 21,083 25,111 29,154 33,216 37,148 LOCKNEY 2,056 2,162 2,270 2,308 2,326 2,246 2,131 LOG CABIN 733 883 1,046 1,200 1,200 1,200 1,200 LOMETA 782 869 961 1,028 1,078 1,110 1,130 LONE OAK 521 521 521 521 521 521 521 LONE STAR 1,631 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 1,630 LONGVIEW 73,344 76,827 80,433 84,160 88,473 94,312 102,661 LORAINE 656 659 657 646 631 613 576 LORENA 1,433 1,640 1,849 2,1025 2,207 2,323 2,491 LORENZO 1,372 1,490 1,586 1,652 1,718 1,721 1,694 LOS FRESNOS 4,512 8,649 8,908 11,243 13,571 15,899 18,114 LOS INDIOS 1,149 1,418 1,703 1,997 2,290 2,583 2,862 LOTT 724 724 724 724 724 724 724 LOVELADY 608 628 644 670 696 724 753 LOWRY CROSSING 1,229 1,898 2,434 2,910 3,000 3,000 3,000 4!712011 1:11:22 PM Page 21 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 LUBBOCK 199,564 216,974 227,996 235.151 239,591 242,831 248.622 LUCAS 2.890 6.400 9,849 12,000 15,50{1 22,000 30,000 LUFKIN 32.709 37,219 42,351 48,190 54,834 62,394 70,997 LULING 5,080 6,309 7,301 7,998 8,700 9,407 10,092 LUMBERTON 8,731 9,899 10,736 11,117 11,511 11,919 12,342 LYFORD 1.973 2,335 2,512 2,684 2,839 2,972 3,076 LYTLE 2,383 2,500 2,620 2,726 2,810 2,881 2.934 MASANK 2,151 3,074 3,729 4,401 5,142 6,058 7,194 MADISONVILLE 4,159 4,442 4,725 4,951 5,162 5,349 5,512 MAGNOLIA 1,111 2,151 3,012 4,054 5,203 6,718 8,478 MALAKOFF 2,257 2,390 2,535 2,678 2,824 3,003 3,228 MANOR 1,204 6,275 7.558 8,815 9,955 10,784 11,613 MANSFIELD 28,031 57,337 80,000 103,000 123,658 139,058 154,458 MANV'EL 3,046 4,510 4.510 4,510 4,510 4,510 4,510 MARBLE FALLS 4,959 7,796 10,132 12,679 15,155 16,613 18,216 MARFA 2.121 2,585 2.855 3,154 3,154 3,154 3,154 MARION 1,099 1,213 1,353 1,504 1,655 1,822 2,002 MARLIN 6,628 6,862 7,155 7,455 7,718 7,927 8,173 MARSHALL 23,935 24,229 24,520 24,730 24,888 25,073 25.346 MART 2,273 2,475 2,679 2,851 3,029 3.142 3.307 MARTI NDALE 953 1,150 1,291 1,378 1,465 1,553 1,638 MASON 2,134 2,157 2,169 2,175 2,178 2,179 2.180 MATADOR 740 732 708 662 606 567 542 MATHIS 5,034 5,034 5,034 5,034 5,034 5,034 5.034 MAUD 1,028 1,116 1.190 1,248 1,305 1,305 1,305 4612011 1 :11:22 PM Page 22 of 39 CITY 2011 REGIONAL CITY POPULATION 2000 PROJECTIONS 2010 WATER e. FOR 2820 2000 2030 i.l 2040 2050 2068 MAYPEARL 746 1,000 1,250 1.500 1,500 1,500 1,500 MCALLEN 106,414 132,267 158,046 186,889 218,068 252,084 286,959 MCCAMEY 1,805 2,038 2,243 2,320 2,381 2,461 2,539 MCGREGOR 4.727 4,760 4,793 4,821 4,850 4,869 4,896 MCKINNEY 54,369 130,000 200.000 275,000 350,000 380,000 380,000 MCLEAN 830 809 802 780 750 704 659 MCLENDON- CHISHOLM 914 1.800 2,000 2,200 2,400 2,765 3,255 MEADOW 658 712 762 810 856 861 856 MEADOWLAKES 1,293 2,331 3,030 3,791 4,532 4,967 5,447 MEADOWS 4,912 6,961 6,961 6,961 6,961 6,961 6,961 MELISSA 1,350 5,000 23,000 35,000 50,000 70,000 77,044 MEMPHIS 2,479 2,483 2,474 2,468 2,473 2,471 2,480 MENARD 1,653 1,746 1,771 1,771 1.771 1,771 1,771 MERCEDES 13,649 15,775 17,129 18,636 20,260 22,023 23.827 MERIDIAN 1,491 1419 1,756 1,852 1,888 1,903 1,921 MERKEL 2,637 2,842 2,972 3,035 3,053 2,996 2,903 MERTZON 839 894 918 896 840 796 761 MESQUITE 124,523 142,002 165,003 180,004 183,168 183,445 183,501 MEXIA 6,563 6.892 7,237 7,600 7,980 8,380 8,800 MIAMI 588 617 633 568 477 412 372 MIDLAND 94,996 100,137 105,639 109,561 112,478 114,324 116,064 MIDLOTHIAN 7,480 16,500 33,000 45,000 55,000 65,000 75,000 MILES 850 879 984 1,063 1,151 1,219 1,284 MILFORD 685 737 737 737 737 737 737 MINEOLA 4,550 5,290 5,967 6,343 6,384 6,384 6,384 4!7!2011 1 :11:22 PM Page 23 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 MINERAL WELLS 16,946 19.074 20,200 21,123 21,955 22,873 23,901 MISSION 45,408 68,351 88,532 111,086 135,447 161,998 189,204 MISSOURI CITY 52,913 83,645 104,844 125,194 145,816 160,523 193,025 MONAHANS 6.821 7,138 7,322 7,407 7,407 7 „407 7,407 MONT BELVIEU 2,324 3,224 4,227 5,160 5,968 6,788 7,628 MONTGOMERY 0 1,200 5,000 7,500 10,000 12,500 15,000 MOODY 1,400 1,453 1.507 1,552 1,599 1,629 1,672 MORGAN 0 569 668 784 920 1,080 1,268 MORGANS POINT RESORT 2,989 4,219 4,781 5,290 5,617 5,828 5,981 MORTON 2,249 2,464 2,616 2,683 2,638 2,528 2,405 M'OULTON 944 921 920 895 851 799 740 MOUNT ENTERPRISE 525 540 554 562 566 577 605 MOUNT PLEASANT 13,935 15,201 16,611 17,870 19,433 20,844 22,255 MOUNT VERNON 2,286 2,788 3.230 3,532 3,834 3,834 3,834 MOUNTAIN CITY 671 1,019 1,187 1,361 1,536 1,746 1,911 MUENSTER 1,556 1,700 1,800 1,900 2,000 2,100 2,200 MULESHOE 4,530 4,850 5,192 5,410 5,638 5,659 5,555 MUNDAY 1,527 1,520 1,534 1,535 1,636 1,535 1,530 MURCHISON 592 642 696 749 804 871 955 MURPHY 3,099 14,000 2.8,500 28,500 28,500 28,500 28,500 MUSTANG RIDGE 785 1,041 1,336 1,597 1,823 2,054 2,279 NACOGDOCHES 29,914 33,044 36.501 39,946 43.074 49,198 54,345 NAPLES 1,410 1,409 1,409 1,409 1,409 1,409 1 ,409 NASH 2,169 2,355 2.511 2,633 2,754 2,754 2,754 NASSAU BAY 4,170 4,170 4,170 4,170 4,170 4,170 4,170 417/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 24 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 NATALIA 1,663 1,937 2,240 2,523 2,768 3,006 3,219 NAVASOTA 6,789 7,111 7,470 7,753 7,950 8,107 8,262 NEDERLAND 17,422 18,052 18,958 19,775 20,404 21,039 22,2238 NEEDVILLE 2,609 3 „875 4,881 6,111 7,375 9,033 10,928 NEVADA 563 690 1500 1,800 3,600 6,000 15,000 NEW BOSTON 4,808 5,219 5,567 5,836 6,105 6,105 6,105 NEW BRAUNFELS 36,494 46,909 60,186 75,239 90,002 105,392 121,944 NEW CHAPEL HILL 553 635 697 758 819 922 1,058 NEW DEAL 708 863 972 1,031 1,041 1,083 1,051 NEW FAIRVIEW 877 1,587 2,167 2,732 3,290 3,921 4,654 NEW HOPE 662 826 1,200 2.000 3,000 4,500 10,000 NEW LONDON 987 1,026 1,063 1,084 1,094 1,123 1,194 NEW SUMMERFIELD 998 1,290 1.624 1.910 2,173 2,434 2,742 NEW WAVERLY 950 1,087 1,199 1,252 1,239 1,242 1,242 NEWARK 887 1,137 1,772 2,339 3,302 4,458 6,216 NEWCASTLE 575 581 593 594 587 579 573 NEWTON 2,459 2,612 2,730 2.745 2,827 2,912 3,000 NIEDERWALD 584 1,021 1,530 2,046 2,564 3,158 3,650 NIXON 2.186 2,353 2,535 2,674 2.774 2,803 2,794 NOCONA 3,198 3,321 3,442 3.491 3,510 3,515 3,528 NOLANVILLE 2,150 2,611 2.753 2,882 2,965 3,019 3,058 NOME 515 549 598 643 677 712 777 NOONDAY 515 550 576 602 628 672 730 NORMANGEE 719 818 918 979 986 985 995 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 55,635 64,861 73,503 79,341 83.286 85,951 87,751 4/7/2011 1:11:22 PM Page 25 of 39 CITY 2011 REGIONAL CITY POPULATION 2000 PROJECTIONS 2010 WATER PLAN FOR 2020 ill - 2060 2030 2040 2050 2060 NORTHLAKE 921 1,700 4,974 5,753 11,059 16,364 19,684 O'DONNELL 1,011 1,073 1.119 1,117 1,115 1,068 997 OAK GROVE 710 928 1,141 1,360 1,602 1,902 2,274 OAK LEAF 1,209 1,502 1.774 2,042 2.3161 2,622 2,960 OAK POINT 1,747 3,988 8,534 12,812 14,471 16,141 17,905 OAK RIDGE NORTH 2,991 3,743 4,202 5,100 6,144 7,521 9.120 ODEM 2,499 2,701 2,920 3,131 3,325 3,508 3,677 ODESSA 90,943 95,490 100,264 105,277 110,540 116,067 121,870 OLD RIVER- WINFREE 1,364 1,585 1.755 1,913 2,050 2,189 2,331 OLMOS PARK 2.343 2,549 2,744 2,918 3,059 3,186 3,299 OLNEY 3,396 3,429 3,504 3,509 3,469 3,418 3,386 OLTON 2,288 2,413 2,5617 2,700 2,799 2,784 2,748 OMAHA 999 999 999 999 999 999 999 ONALASKA 1,174 1,562 1,944 2,252 2,480 2,691 2,897 ORANGE 18,643 18,643 18,643 18,643 18,643 18,643 18,643 ORANGE GROVE 1,288 1,390 1,484 1,544 1,571 1,559 1,526 ORE CITY 1,105 1,261 1,418 1,525 1,592 1,645 1,7115 OVERTON 2,350 2,507 2.654 2,740 2,786 2,908 3,193 OVILLA 3,405 3,850 6,070 8,290 10,508 11,050 11,846 OYSTER CREEK 1.192 1,424 1,666 1,897 2,110 2.336 2,572 PADUCAH 1,498 1,458 1,455 1,384 1,304 1,233 1,193 PALACIOS 5,153 5,499 5,878 6,108 6.235 6,235 6,235 PALESTINE 17,598 18,965 20,028 20,830 21,663 22,313 22.870 PALM VALLEY 1,298 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 1,400 PALMER 1,774 2.178 2,335 2,490 2.648 2,825 3,022 4!7/2011 1 :11:23 PM Page 26 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 PALMHURST 4,872 9,144 14,136 19,727 25,777 32,384 39,162 PALMVIEW 4,107 6,258 8,771 11,586 14,632 17,959 21,372 PAMPA 17,887 17,430 17.292 16,807 16,155 15,157 14,206 PANHANDLE 2,589 2,599 2,626 2,605 2,521 2,291 2,081 PANORAMA VILLAGE 1,965 2,160 2,281 2,402 2,523 2,644 2,765 PANTEGO 2,318 2,318 2,318 2.318 2,318 2,318 2,318 PARADISE 0 563 691 848 1,041 1,278 1,568 PARIS 25,898 28,048 30,190 32,192 34,194 34,194 34.194 PARKER 1,379 3,900 10,900 16,000 26,000 38,000 52,000 PASADENA 141,674 161,678 181,156 200,314 219,278 238,124 256,898 PATTON VILLAGE 1,391 1,721 1,923 2,318 2,777 3,382 4,085 PAYNE SPRINGS 683 730 781 831 882 945 1,024 PEARLAND 37,+640 85,877 108,518 129,166 148,269 168,447 189,437 PEARSALL 7,157 7,317 7,474 7,608 7,719 7,800 7,842 PECAN HILL 672 813 943 1,072 1 ,203 1,350 1,512 PECOS 9,501 10,583 11,690 12,604 13,363 14,053 14,600 PELICAN BAY 1,505 1.830 2.050 2,277 2,515 2,801 3,139 PENITAS 1,167 1,261 1,316 1,376 1,441 1.511 1,584 PERRYTON 7,774 8,453 9,208 9,769 10,148 10,334 10,571 PETERSBURG 1,262 1,360 1,452 1,518 1,559 1,549 1,519 PETROLIA 782 808 8331 826 792 743 695 PFLUGERVILLE 16,335 39,480 47,557 55,460 62,638 67,850 73,069 PHARR 46,660 65,969 82,640 101,269 121,386 143,309 165,772 PILOT POINT 3,538 5.047 7,067 12,000 13,290 14,100 15,000 PINE FOREST 632 632 632 632 632 632 632 4!7!2011 1:11:23 PM Page 27 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2048 2050 2060 PINE ISLAND 849 1,102 1,402 1,736 2,107 2,549 3,057 PINEHURST 2,274 2,274 2,274 2,274 2,274 2,274 2,274 PI NELAND 980 1,056 1,099 1,132 1,166 1.201 1,237 PINEY POINT VILLAGE 3,380 3,546 3,708 3.867 4,024 4.180 4,336 PITTSBURG 4,347 4,561 4,798 5,018 5,192 5.327 5,475 PLAINS 1,450 1,621 1,776 1,875 1,982 1,928 1,863 PLAINVIEW 22,336 24,078 25,693 26,871 27,585 27,424 26,893 PLANO 222,030 263,300 271,100 275,000 277,000 279,000 280,000 PLEAK 947 1,250 1,490 1,784 2,086 2,482 2,935 PLEASA►NTON 8,266 8,728 9.205 9,624 9,953 10,231 10,434 PLUM GROVE 930 1,234 1,569 1,890 2,205 2,550 2,937 POINT 792 949 1,082 1,216 1,349 1,482 1,615 POINT BLANK 559 662 763 843 893 922 935 POINT COMFORT 781 1,276 1,870 2,959 4,081 4,081 4,081 PONDER 507 1,350 5,000 10,000 16,000 18,500 19,000 PORT ARANSAS 3,370 5,565 7,843 9,830 11,575 13,117 14,348 PORT ARTHUR 57,755 57,755 57,755 57,755 57.755 57,755 57,755 PORT ISABEL 4,865 5,282 5,723 6,179 6,633 7,088 7,520 PORT LAVACA 12,035 13,163 14,325 15,513 16,717 17,925 19,030 PORT NECHES 13,601 13,956 14,466 14,926 15,281 15,638 16,314 PORTLAND 14,827 18,786 23,071 27,197 31,000 34,578 37,884 POST 3,708 3,860 4,007 3,926 3,776 3,602 3,361 POST OAK BEND CITY 0 659 1,075 1,754 2,862 4,671 7,623 POTEET 3,305 3,383 3,463 3,534 3,589 3,636 3,670 POTH 1,850 2.099 2,409 2.750 3,081 3,425 3,783 4!712011 1:11:23 PM Page 28 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2€130 2040 2050 2060 POTTSBORO 1,579 3,000 5,000 7,000 9,004 11,000 12,000 PRAIRIE VIEW 4,410 4,780 5,217 5,704 6,247 6,893 7,634 PREMONT 2,772 2,991 3,193 3,323 3,380 3,356 3,284 PRESIDIO 4,167 5,360 6,589 7,746 8,777 9,286 9,577 PRIMERA 2,723 3,973 4,871 5,806 6,748 7,699 8,613 PRINCETON 3,477 6,178 12,356 18,000 30,000 50,000 75,000 PROGRESO 4,851 6,348 8,097 10,056 12,176 14,491 16,866 PROSPER 2,097 8,000 20,000 35,000 50,000 70,000 75,000 QUANAH 3,022 2,981 2.954 2,863 2,746 2,617 2,371 QUEEN CITY 1,693 1,642 1.709 1,774 1,841 1,841 1,841 QU IN LAN 1,370 1,375 1,383 1,394 1,412 1,452 1,514 QUITMAN 2,030 2,360 2.662 2,830 2,848 2,848 2,848 RALL.S 2,252 2,445 2,603 2,711 2,820 2,826 2,780 RANCHO VIEJO 1,754 2,300 2,350 2,400 2,450 2,500 2,550 RANGER 2,584 2,590 2,596 2,551 2,481 2,399 2,292 RANKIN 800 871 934 958 977 1,002 1,026 RANSOM CANYON 1,011 1,461 1,911 2,361 2,811 3,261 3,433 RAYMONDVILLE 9,733 10,071 10,402 10,704 10,947 11,112 11,194 RED LICK 853 926 986 1,036 1,083 1,083 1,083 RED OAK 4.301 12,500 21,000 26,000 28,000 30,000 32.000 REDWATER 872 947 1,010 1,058 1,107 1,107 1,107 REFUGIO 2,941 3,511 3,933 4,085 4,364 4,534 4,478 RENO (LAMAR) 2,767 4,327 4,869 5,424 5,852 6,314 6.776 RENO (PARKER) 2,441 2,569 2,676 2,763 2,838 2,918 3,005 RHOME 551 1,621 2,640 4.300 6,000 7.700 9,400 4,6762011 1:11:23 PM Page 29 of 39 CITY 2000 2+010 2020 2030 2040 2058 2060 RICE 798 954 1,123 1,299 1,490 1,718 1,998 RICHARDSON 91,776 102,880 116,400 116,000 116,000 116,000 116,000 RICHLAND HILLS 8,132 8,400 9.000 9,600 10,300 10,700 10,850 RICHMOND 11,081 1.3,493 14,212 17,257 20,334 25,149 30,295 RICHWOOD 3,012 3,534 3,798 4,050 4,282 4,528 4,785 RI ESEL 973 1,074 1,176 1,262 1,351 1,407 1,489 RIO BRAVO 5,553 8,318 11,-86 15,203 19,205 23,579 28,199 RIO GRANDE CITY 11,923 14,982 16,674 18,447 20,259 22,090 23,878 RIO HONDO 1,942 2,223 2,419 2,623 2,829 3,037 3,238 RIO VISTA 656 751 863 981 1,110 1,270 1 ,466 RISING STAR 835 837 839 824 802 775 740 RIVER OAKS 6,985 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 7,100 ROANOKE 2,810 7.000 10.080 13,160 16,240 21,615 26,197 ROBERT LEE 1,171 1.136 1,136 1,136 1,136 1,136 1,136 ROBINSON 7,845 9,592 11,353 12,837 14,375 15,352 16,772 ROBSTOWN 12,727 12.727 12,727 12,727 12,727 12,727 12,727 ROBY 673 682 683 702 716 723 745 ROCKDALE 5,439 5,596 5,746 5,848 5,915 5,946 5,966 ROCKPORT 7,385 8.818 10,046 10,688 10,570 9,987 9,451 ROCKSPRINGS 1,285 1,380 1,439 1,405 1,362 1,346 1,290 ROCKWALL 17,976 37,438 64,647 80,000 93,595 96,067 961,067 ROGERS 1,117 1,117 1,117 1,117 1,117 1,117 1,117 ROLLINGWOOD 1,403 1,414 1,428 1,441 1.449 1.458 1,467 ROMA CITY 9,617 11,989 13,791 15,661 17,559 19,449 21,277 ROMAN FOREST 1,279 4,372 6,934 10,035 13,452 17,959 23,194 41712011 1;11.23 PM Page 30 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 ROPESVILLE 517 556 580 594 595 572 544 ROSCOE 1,378 1,443 1,498 1,523 1,518 1,460 1,391 ROSE CITY 519 519 519 519 519 519 519 ROSEBUD 1,493 1,493 1,493 1,493 1,493 1,493 1,493 ROSENBERG 24,043 37,420 48,048 61,043 74,405 91,929 111,953 ROTAAN 1,611 1,562 1,559 1,461 1,385 1,347 1,230 ROUND ROCK 61,136 106,502 146,110 192,941 243,446 298,374 357,260 ROWLETT 44,503 59,271 70,856 80,178 87,714 93,811 98,747 ROXTON 694 752 809 863 916 916 916 ROYSE CITY 2,957 12,000 21,000 28,445 37,184 45,646 55,000 RULE 698 671 657 638 628 610 580 RUNAWAY BAY 1,104 1,411 1,720 2,097 2,400 2,700 3,000 RUNGE 1,080 1,099 1,209 1,294 1,367 1,445 1,503 RUSK 5,085 5,525 6,029 6,461 6,858 7,252 7,717 SABINAL 1,586 1,588 1,590 1,592 1.593 1,594 1,595 SACHSE 9,751 20,560 23,700 27,000 27,000 27,000 27,000 SAGINAW 12,374 18,813 22,803 25,711 27,829 29,373 30,499 SAINT JO 898 898 898 898 898 898 898 SAINT PAUL 630 1,000 2,500 5,000 8,000 9,500 10,000 SAN ANGELO 88.439 94,261 99,070 102,120 103,808 105,145 105,445 SAN ANTONIO 1.144.646 1,354,381 1,552,538 1,729,245 1,872.964 2,002,017 2,116.782 SAKI AUGUSTINE 2,475 2,688 2,742 2,812 2,897 2,984 3,043 SAN BENITO 23,444 26,922 30,599 34,400 38,189 41,979 45,584 SAN DIEGO 4,753 5,046 5,300 5,445 5,490 5,360 5,115 SAN ELIZARIO 11,046 20,444 31,112 40,475 48,551 56,627 64,703 417/2011 1;11:23 PM Page 31 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2830 2040 2050 2060 SAN FELIPE 868 1,106 1,332 1,490 1,584 1,629 1,691 SAN JUAN 26,229 39,074 54,082 70,892 89,081 108,947 129,327 SAN LEANNA 0 546 659 766 868 938 1,009 SAN MARCOS 34,733 48,814 69,906 90,990 114,477 139,466 158,099 SAN PERLITA 680 747 812 871 919 952 968 SAN SABA 2,637 2,640 2,645 2,649 2,653 2,653 2,654 SANCTUARY 0 715 1,675 2,435 2,875 3,305 3,708 SANDERSON 861 921 956 956 956 956 956 SANGER 4,534 7,750 12,750 17,947 21,400 23,998 25,000 SANSOM PARK VILLAGE 4,181 4,376 4,527 4,644 4,734 4,804 4,857 SANTA ANNA 1,081 1,070 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 1,071 SANTA CLARA 899 1,792 2,884 4,064 5,243 6,551 7,959 SANTA FE 9.548 1 0,141 1 0,653 10,956 11,079 11 .170 11,229 SANTA ROSA 2,833 3,472 4,148 4,847 5,543 6.240 6,903 SAVOY 850 869 889 910 930 952 974 SCHERTZ 18,694 26,856 36,645 47,115 57,457 68,815 80,944 SCHULENBURG 2,699 3,194 3,695 4,108 4,429 4,796 5,282 SCURRY 0 678 789 918 1,068 1.242 1,445 SEABROOK 9,443 11,943 14,377 16,771 19,141 21,496 23,842 SEADRIFT 1,352 1,408 1,459 1,499 1,525 1,537 1,545 SEAGOVILLE 10,823 13,017 16,327 19,537 22.848 25,536 27,517 SEAGRAVES 2,334 2,602 2,850 3,029 3,156 3,135 3,093 SEALY 5,248 7,902 10,421 12,178 13,222 13,723 14.410 SEGUIN 22,011 25,309 29,339 33,696 38,048 42,877 48,077 SELMA 788 4,851 6,291 7,731 7,750 7,750 7,750 4/7/2011 1:11:23 PM Page 32 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SEMINOLE 5,910 6,589 7,216 7,669 7,991 7,939 7,831 SEVEN POINTS 1,145 1,402 1,681 1,956 2,238 2,582 3,016 SEYMOUR 2,908 2,692 2,569 2,378 2,206 2,089 1,933 SHADY SHORES 1,461 2,474 3,228 3,936 3,936 3,936 3.936 SHALLOWATER 2,086 2,400 2,621 2,740 2,760 2,846 2,780 SHAMROCK 2,029 1,963 1,963 1,954 1,970 1,966 1,941 SHAVANO PARK 1,754 1,806 1,855 1,899 1,935 1,967 1,995 SHENANDOAH 1,503 5,123 5,999 7,059 8,228 9,770 11,560 SHEPHERD 2,029 2,604 3,168 3,619 3,900 4,063 4,137 SHERMAN 35,082 39,300 44,400 50,600 57,700 67,000 80.000 SHINER 2,070 2,020 2,018 1,963 1,866 1,753 1,623 SHOREACRES 1.488 1,644 1,796 1,945 2,093 2,093 2,093 SIERRA (BLANCA 533 608 661 688 688 688 688 SlS6EE 6,393 7,248 7,861 8,140 8,429 8,728 9,037 SILVERTON 771 802 818 803 766 752 732 SIMONTON 718 953 1,140 1,369 1,604 1,912 2,264 SINTON 5,676 5,869 6,078 6,279 6,465 6.640 6,801 SKELLYTOWN 610 612 619 614 594 540 490 SLATON 6,109 6,135 6,153 6,163 6,165 6.172 6,167 SMITHVIL,LE 3,901 5,606 7,866 10,039 13,244 15,863 19,070 SMYER 480 516 539 552 553 532 506 SNOOK 568 624 685 729 763 788 810 SNYDER 10,783 11,179 11,554 11,753 11,858 11,927 11,927 SOCORRO 27,152 33,017 39,675 45,519 50,559 55,599 60,639 SOMERSET 1,550 2,009 2,443 2,830 3,145 3,428 3,679 4812011 1:11:23 PM Page 33 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SOMERVILLE 1,704 1,818 1,942 2,032 2,101 2,152 2,197 SONORA 2,924 3,212 3,397 3,428 3,415 3,423 3,389 SOUR LAKE 1,667 1,890 2,050 2.123 2,198 2.276 2,356 SOUTH HOUSTON 15,833 17,307 18,742 20,153 21,550 22,938 24,321 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND 2,422 3,2013 4,028 4,881 5,732 6,583 7,392 SOUTHLAKE 21,519 28,019 29,636 30,107 31,924 34,188 36,000 SOUTHMAYD 992 1,200 1,500 2,000 3,004 4,500 5,600 SOUTHSIDE PLACE 1,546 1,686 1,822 1,956 2,088 2,220 2,351 SPEARMAN 3,021 3,142 3,307 3.448 3,601 3,690 3,769 SPLENDORA 1,275 2.017 2,470 3,356 4.386 5,745 7,323 SPRING VALLEY 3,611 3,810 4,003 4,193 4,381 4,568 4,754 SPRINGTOWN 2,062 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 SPUR 1,088 1,088 1,088 1,088 1,088 1.088 1,088 ST, HEDWIG 1,875 2,364 2,826 3,238 3.573 3,874 4,141 STAFFORD 15,681 23,339 31,275 40,978 50,955 64,039 78,989 STAGECOACH 0 626 861 1,185 1,630 2,243 3,086 STAFFORD 3.636 3,712 3.802 3,798 3,742 3,635 3,498 STANTON 2,556 2,802 3,068 3,196 3,276 3,196 3,034 STEPHENVILLE 14,921 15,959 17,076 18,082 19,094 21,775 23,462 STERLING CITY 1.081 1.187 1304 1,353 1.370 1,332 1,350 STINNETT 1,936 1,974 2,001 1,973 1,908 1,802 1,711 STOCKDALE 1,398 1,553 1,747 1,960 2,167 2,383 2,606 STRATFORD 1,991 2,172 2,365 2,439 2,515 2,582 2,617 STRAWN 739 767 801 830 858 891 929 SUDAN 1,039 1,096 1,166 1,226 1,271 1,264 1,248 4/7/2011 1:11:23 'PM Page 34 D# 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SUGAR LANE) 63.328 83,819 101,422 105,000 105,000 105,000 105,000 SULLIVAN CITY 3,998 5,528 7,315 9,317 11,483 13,849 16,276 SULPHUR SPRINGS 14,551 17,034 18,701 20,369 22,036 23,703 25,370 SUNDOWN 1,505 1,619 1,689 1,730 1,732 1,+665 1,583 SUNNYVALE 2,693 5,000 7,000 9,000 11,000 13,000 13,300 SUNRAY 1,950 2,237 2.550 2,826 3,045 3,178 3,258 SUNRISE BEACH VILLAGE 704 829 896 914 932 950 968 SURFSIDE BEACH 763 889 1,020 1,146 1,262 1,385 1,513 SWEENY 3,624 3,895 4,177 4,447 4,696 4,960 5.236 SWEETWATER 11,415 11,955 12,408 12,616 12,578 12,1198 11,525 TAFT 3,396 3,661 3,947 4,223 4,477 4,716 4,937 TAHOKA 2,910 3,096 3,234 3,218 3,206 3,061 2,849 TALCO 570 570 570 570 570 570 570 TALTY 1,028 1,800 3,832 5,256 6,834 8,788 11,211 TATUM 1,175 1,186 1,191 1,194 1,198 1,200 1,202 TAYLOR 13,575 17,935 20,613 23,797 27,259 31,025 35,065 TAYLOR LAKE VILLAGE 3.694 5.472 5,472 5,472 5,472 5,472 5,472 TEAGUE 4,557 5,201 5,846 6,450 7,135 7,779 8,424 TEMPLE 54,514 62,382 71,350 80,830 89,247 97,774 105,519 TENAHA 1,046 1,046 1,046 1,046 1,046 1,046 1,046 TERRELL 13,606 16,185 45,005 65,000 85,000 97,000 110,000 TERRELL HILLS 5,019 5,502 5,959 6,366 6,697 6,994 7,258 TEXARKANA 34,782 37,761 40,270 42,217 44,164 44,164 44,164 TEXAS CITY 41,521 41,891 42,211 42,400 42,477 42,534 42.571 TEXLINE 511 563 607 634 641 628 599 417/2011 1:11;23 PM Page 35 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 THE COLONY 26,531 40,500 56,000 63,000 65,000 67,000 67,600 THE HILLS 1.492 2,301 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 THORNDALE 1,278 1,421 1,558 1,651 1.712 1,740 1,758 THORNTON 524 524 524 524 524 524 524 THRALL 710 976 1,176 1,415 1,674 1,956 2,258 THREE RIVERS 1,878 2,096 2,278 2,347 2,291 2,107 1,896 THROCKMORTOiN 905 905 877 838 775 725 688 TIKI ISLAND 1,016 1,270 1,489 1,619 1,672 1,711 1,736 TIMPSON 1,094 1.120 1,154 1,181 1,201 1 218 1,237 TIOGA 754 1,100 2,500 3,500 4,000 4,400 4,600 TO LAR 504 749 958 1,153 1,357 1,614 1.911 TOM BEAN 941 1,100 1,300 1,500 1,700 1,900 2,000 TOMBALL 9,089 12,059 15,429 18,150 22,954 26,554 31,650 TOOL 2,275 2,618 2,990 3,357 3,733 4,192 4,771 TRENTON 662 1,000 1,500 2,500 4,000 6,000 8,000 TRINIDAD 1,091 1,112 1,135 1,158 1,181 1,210 1,246 TRINITY 2,721 3,033 3,273 3,352 3,311 3.180 3,060 TROPHY CLUB 6,350 8,253 9307 10,211 10,995 11,841 12,687 TROUP 1,949 2,157 2,315 2,471 2,627 2,886 3,229 TROY 1,378 1,378 1,378 1.378 1,378 1,378 1,378 TULIA 5,117 5,358 5,550 5,698 5,755 5,650 5.405 TUSCOLA 714 769 804 822 827 812 786 TYE 1,158 1,248 1,305 1,333 1,341 1,316 1,275 TYLER 83,650 89,571 93,997 98,409 102,809 110,207 119,994 UNIVERSAL CITY 14,849 17,248 19,722 21,970 21,970 21,970 21,970 41712011 1:11:23 PM Page 36 of 39 CITY 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 UNIVERSITY PARK 23,324 24,092 24.647 25,D46 25.335 25.543 25.693 UVALDE 14,929 15,137 15,356 15,538 15,681 15,776 15,848 VALLEY MILLS 1,123 1,282 1,452 1,571 1,616 1,634 1,656 VALLEY VIEW 737 1,500 3,000 5,000 7,000 12,000 15.000 VAN 2,362 2,725 3,106 3,428 3,670 3,977 4,319 VAN ALSTYNE 2,502 3,000 7,500 13,500 17,000 18,500 19,200 VAN HORN 2,435 2,743 2.943 3,031 3,060 3,060 3,060 VEGA 936 995 1.017 944 832 724 584 VENUS 1,892 2,435 2,435 2,435 2,435 2,435 2,435 VERNON 11,660 12,139 12,655 12,706 12,451 11,8" 11,144 VICTORIA 60,603 65,709 71,058 75,452 78,945 81,814 84,342 VIDOR 11,440 11,922 12,251 12,386 12,443 12.562 12,648 VINTON 1,892 3,708 5,769 7,578 9,138 10,698 12,258 WACO 113,726 121,355 129,046 135,528 142,247 146,514 152,715 WAELDER 947 1,124 1,316 1,463 1,568 1,599 1,589 WAKE VILLAGE 5,129 5,546 5,993 6,441 6,888 7,336 7,784 WALLER 2,092 2,637 3,240 3,886 4,582 5,374 6,255 WALLIS 1,172 1,335 1 ,490 1 ,598 1 ,662 1,693 1735 WALNUT SPRINGS 755 804 857 894 908 914 921 WASKOM 2,068 2,365 2,659 2,872 3,032 3,220 3,496 WATAUGA 21.908 23,423 24,632 25,000 25,000 25,000 25,000 WAXAHACHIE 21,426 30,000 39,000 46,342 59,322 75,937 97,206 WEATHERFORD 19,000 26,877 33,000 38,365 43,389 48,773 54,799 WEESTER 9,083 13,076 16,964 20,788 24,573 28,334 32,081 WEIMAR 1.981 2.188 2.375 2,472 2,472 2.571 2,691 4/712011 1:11:23 PM Page 37 of 39 CITY 200D 2010 2820 2034 2840 2050 21360 WEIR 591 936 1,345 1,831 2,360 2,935 3,552 WELLINGTON 2,275 2,239 2.241 2,187 2,114 2,058 1,965 WELLS 769 774 780 785 789 793 798 WESLACCO 26,935 32,862 37,961 43,658 49,811 56,516 63,385 WEST 2.692 2,825 2,959 3,072 3,189 3,254 3,372 WEST COLUMBIA 4,255 4,404 4,297 4,194 4,100 4,000 3,895 WEST LAKE HILLS 3,116 3,520 4,061 4,561 4,873 5,203 5,543 WEST ORANGE 4,111 4,111 4,111 4.111 4,111 4,111 4,111 WEST TAWAKONI 1,462 1,663 1,859 2,004 2,169 2,344 2,519 WEST UNIVERSITY PL. 14,211 15,381 16,520 17,641 18,750 19,852 20,950 WESTON 635 2,000 4,000 7,000 20,000 35,000 60,000 WESTOVER HILLS 658 658 658 658 658 658 658 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 2,124 3.224 3,403 3,618 3,869 4,156 4,586 WHARTON 9,237 9,769 10,327 10.685 10,892 10,897 10,782 WHEELER 1,378 1,374 1,374 1,373 1,374 1,374 1,373 WHITE DEER 1,060 1.065 1,076 1,066 1.032 938 852 WHITE OAK 5,824 6,174 6,743 7,331 8,012 8,934 10,252 WHITE SETTLEMENT 14,831 15,800 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,500 22,000 WHITEHOUSE 5,346 6,305 7,022 7,736 8.449 9,647 11,232 WHITESBORO 3,760 4,400 5,000 5,700 6,500 7,500 10,000 WHITEWRIGHT 1.740 2.022 3,228 4,532 5,535 6.538 7,541 WHITNEY 1,833 2,157 2,227 2,306 2,385 2,470 2,564 WICHITA FALLS 104,197 109,663 114,576 117,825 119,525 120,710 121,668 WILLIS 3,985 5,695 6,739 8.780 11,153 14,283 17,918 WILLOW PARK 2.849 4,164 5,871 8,278 10,000 11,200 12,000 4/7/2011 1:11:23 PM Page 38 of 39 CITY 2000 2+010 2020 2030 2040 2,050 2060 WILLS POINT 3,496 3,860 4,243 4,566 4,809 5,117 5,460 WILMER 3.393 3,800 4,400 5,200 7,500 14,000 22,000 WILSON 532 566 591 588 586 560 521 WINDCREST 5,105 5,143 5,181 5,218 5,256 5,294 5,331 WINK 919 974 1,019 1,028 1,030 1,011 979 WINNSBORO 3,584 4,208 4,774 5,107 5,228 5,228 5,228 WINONA 582 672 739 806 873 986 1,135 WINTERS 2,880 2,951 3,056 3,135 3,224 3,293 3,380 WVOLFE CITY 1,566 1,598 1,649 1,718 1,828 2,070 2,446 WOLFFORTH 2,554 9,360 11,457 12,047 12,645 13,270 13,566 WOODBRANCH 1,305 1,567 1,784 2,047 2,336 2,718 3,161 WOODCREEK 1,274 1,730 2,252 2,792 3,335 3,987 4,500 WOODSBORO 1,685 1,806 1,896 1,928 1,987 2,023 2,411 VWOODVILLE 2,415 2,863 3,299 3,580 3.687 3,687 3,687 WOODWAY 8,733 8,762 8,791 8,815 8,840 8,856 8,879 WORTHAM 1,082 1,250 1,500 1,750 2,000 2,200 2,400 WYLIE 15,132 40,000 52,000 63,000 75,000 75,000 75,000 YOAKUM 5,731 5,693 5,743 5.678 5,518 5,288 5,023 YORKTOWN 2,271 2,322 2,379 2,411 2,422 2,385 2,343 ZAPATA 4,856 4,856 4,856 4,856 4,856 4,856 4,856 ZAVALLA 547 647 647 647 647 647 647 TEXAS TOTAL 15,738,730 19,030,499 22,064,233 24,903,072 27,676,005 30,475,412 33,395,172 417/20011 1:11:23 PM Page 39 of 39 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 ABERNATHY 657 690 714 717 715 700 ABILENE 22,891 23,485 23,507 23,181 22,588 21,879 ADDISON 7,904 10,074 10,919 11,514 11,918 12,218 AGUA DULCE 112 110 107 105 103 103 ALAMO 2,319 3,022 3,808 4,675 5,667 6,684 ALAMO HEIGHTS 2,071 2,134 2,136 2,132 2,346 2,170 ALBANY 665 690 676 635 555 466 ALEDO 455 957 1,532 2,106 2,213 2,213 ALICE 5,606 5,912 6,076 6,102 6,033 5,904 ALLEN 20.207 24,699 27,663 27,694 27,694 27.694 ALPINE 1,791 1,888 1,917 1,928 2,014 2,034 ALTO 233 248 261 273 286 304 ALTON 3,346 4,153 5.061 6,056 7,135 8,268 ALVARADO 570 607 654 697 766 858 ALVIN 3,123 3,293 3,440 3,557 3,743 3,970 ALVORD 199 214 228 243 263 287 AMARILLO 42,329 45,817 49,079 52,794 56.848 60,188 AMES 137 159 179 197 221 250 AMHERST 168 176 182 185 183 181 ANAHUAC 353 376 396 410 431 455 ANDREWS 3,087 3,263 3,371 3,467 3,515 3,585 ANGLETON 2,218 2,225 2,243 2,249 2,307 2,394 ANNA 1,653 2.948 4,399 5,865 7,541 12,568 ANNETTA 218 265 305 339 374 416 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 1 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2051 2060 ANNETTA SOUTH 91 105 116 124 135 147 ANSON 415 416 406 391 374 360 ANTHONY 719 826 924 1,004 1,089 1,182 ANTON 263 270 272 268 256 243 ARANSAS PASS 1,599 1,842 2,076 2,269 2,453 2,636 ARCHER CITY 333 343 356 357 341 328 ARCOLA 403 434 474 514 566 622 ARGYLE 1,227 2.902 4,217 4.710 5,271 5,827 ARLINGTON 77,597 85,215 89,219 92,537 92,008 92,008 ARP 173 178 183 188 200 218 ASHERTON 286 299 306 301 293 279 ASPERMONT 202 192 179 165 153 143 ATHENS 2,770 3,276 3,875 4,555 5,447 6,552 ATLANTA 1,330 1,363 1,388 1,417 1,410 1,410 AUBREY 396 855 1,373 1,819 2,445 3,285 AURORA 187 218 237 253 292 338 AUSTIN 155,637 187,259 221,824 253,235 286,130 310,788 AZLE 1,953 2,633 3,602 4,697 5,849 6,860 BAILEY'S PRAIRIE 90 93 95 98 102 107 BAIRD 389 384 378 373 369 369 BALCH SPRINGS 2,621 2,730 2,805 2,852 2,934 3,028 BALCONIES HEIGHTS 514 555 578 600 633 670 BALLINGER 917 998 1,057 1,121 1,178 1,237 BALM ©RHEA 110 126 138 148 157 166 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 3:38:31 PM Page 2 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 BANDERA 259 284 312 332 351 371 BANGS 265 266 262 256 254 254 BARDWELL 103 130 155 182 213 248 BARTLETT 360 377 394 406 421 437 BARTONVILLE 282 943 1,042 1,042 1,842 1,042 BASTROP 1,992 2,739 3,459 4,517 5,382 6,469 BAY CITY 3,236 3,387 3,445 3,441 3,416 3,416 BAYOU VISTA 429 458 471 475 478 482 BAYTOWN 11,761 11,823 11,939 12,028 12,286 12,632 BEACH CITY 314 413 501 579 662 747 BEASLEY 92 104 118 134 156 182 BEAUMONT 27,040 26,657 26,275 25,892 25,636 25,636 BECKVILLE 133 133 132 131 131 132 BEDFORD 10,138 10,447 10,665 10,808 11,017 11,246 BEE CAVE VILLAGE 1,177 1,413 1,647 1,856 2.009 2,164 BEEVILLE 2,619 2,690 2,722 2,699 2,683 2,618 BELLAIRE 3,734 3,993 4,254 4,527 4,817 5,131 BELLMEAD 2,622 2,751 2,873 2,984 3.065 3,202 BELLS 185 271 348 404 456 493 BELLVILLE 1,192 1,477 1,664 1,760 1,810 1,889 BELTON 2,824 3,199 3,542 3,723 3,875 3,920 BENAVI DES 326 333 334 330 319 302 BENBROOK 5,592 6,140 6,721 7,984 9,489 11,254 BERRYVILLE 126 134 142 149 162 179 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 3 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 20201 2030 2040 2050 2060 BERTRAM 282 360 445 527 574 630 BEVERLY HILLS 414 416 416 414 416 424 BEVIL OAKS 137 133 128 124 121 121 BIG LAKE 910 988 1,0126 1,010 970 923 BIG SANDY 202 209 211 211 213 217 BIG SPRING 6,016 6,077 6,035 5.945 5,915 5,915 BIG WELLS 149 156 159 157 153 145 BISHOP 444 433 422 411 404 404 BLANCO 440 508 576 628 679 745 BLOOMING GROVE 461 157 155 152 150 150 BLOSSOM 201 216 230 245 245 245 BLUE MOUND 297 3030 294 286 283 283 BLUE RIDGE 305 627 1.090 1.700 2,473 2,782 BO E RN E 1,570 2,188 2,843 3,370 3,831 4,282 BOGATA 192 187 182 179 179 179 BON HAM 2,348 2,527 3,172 4,337 5,881 7,253 BOOKER 355 364 353 343 338 322 BORGER 2,352 2,384 2,351 2,274 2,148 2.039 BOVINA 321 334 335 330 317 300 BOWIE 1,027 987 966 952 941 943 BOYD 215 278 339 397 459 459 BRACKETTVILLE 583 583 582 582 581 582 BRADY 1,879 1,893 1,874 1,854 1,842 1.842 BRAZOR IA 303 299 294 285 286 291 `AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!712011 3:38:31 PM Page 4 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2064 BRECKENRIDGE 1,214 1,220 1,215 1,190 1,138 1,102 BREMOND 157 154 151 148 146 146 BRENHAM 3,078 3,223 3,303 3,320 3,364 3,415 BRIARCLIFF VILLAGE 254 299 345 387 417 449 BRIDGE CITY 955 977 960 934 936 947 BRIDGEPORT 1 ,361 1 ,899 2,702 3,187 3,713 4,444 BRONTE VILLAGE 245 258 254 250 249 249 BROOKSHIRE 673 847 1 „039 1,254 1,517 1,832 BROOKSIDE VILLAGE 266 296 323 348 378 413 BROWNFIELD 2,747 2,905 3,047 3,181 3.185 3,167 BROWNSBORO 158 182 206 232 263 304 BROWiNSVILLE 45,312 54,105 62,990 72,250 81,481 90,584 BROWNWOOD 3,896 3,927 3,889 3,816 3.792 3,792 BRUCEVILLE -EDDY 827 964 1,081 1,200 1,275 1.389 BRYAN 11,957 13,179 14,221 15,022 16.096 16,493 BRYSON 96 97 96 94 94 94 BUDA 1,454 2,128 2,603 3,088 3,666 4,140 BUFFALO 348 384 401 397 392 395 BULLARD 322 351 379 408 460 532 BULVERDE CITY 1,053 1,742 2,528 3,310 4,123 4,995 BUNKER HILL VILLAGE 1.504 1,491 1,479 1.466 1,462 1,462 BURKBURNETT 1,843 1,820 1,816 1,809 1.806 1,819 BURLESON 5,248 7,676 9,462 9,550 9,749 10,062 BURNET 1,111 1,416 1,738 2,063 2,246 2,463 *AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!7!2011 3:38:31 PM Page 5 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 BYERS 83 81 78 73 64 64 CACTUS 533 615 615 615 615 615 CADDO MILLS 174 178 186 201 242 309 CALDWELL 807 835 854 866 878 894 CALVERT 327 323 318 313 310 310 CAMERON 1,606 1,756 1,840 1,881 1,880 1,888 CAMP WOOD 172 172 166 160 163 167 CAMPBELL 98 104 111 123 149 189 CANADIAN 475 477 461 444 432 411 CANTON 923 978 1.020 1,048 1,095 1,152 CANYON 2,438 2,688 2,922 3, 188 3,478 3,718 CARRIZO SPRINGS 1,842 1,943 1,996 1.981 1,930 1,836 CARROLLTON 25,887 26,113 26.772 27,065 27,356 27,632 CARTHAGE 2,274 2,297 2,311 2,317 2,326 2,343 CASTLE FALLS 820 807 793 780 771 771 CASTROVILLE 680 743 802 854 908 961 CEDAR HILL 10,104 14,351 16,706 17,280 17,280 17,2801 CEDAR PARK 12.149 16,861 18,294 22,222 22,285 22,350 CELESTE 111 120 132 152 195 262 CELINA 1,238 6,234 13,076 23,050 35,253 40,677 CENTER 1,633 1,718 1.785 1.823 1,867 1,923 CENTERVILLE 189 203 210 207 205 2.06 CHANDLER 409 453 494 538 596 674 CHARLOTTE 296 312 324 332 342 350 'AN ACTT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!712011 138:31 PM Page 6 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 CHICO 208 235 276 333 405 495 CHILDRESS 1,457 1,481 1,502 1,509 1,510 1,471 CHILLICOTHE 117 109 106 102 100 98 CHINA 165 157 151 145 140 136 CHINA GROVE 376 457 531 591 645 695 CIBOLO 866 1,190 1,546 1,898 2,298 2,730 Cisco 731 719 694 663 633 604 CLARENDON 440 440 440 440 440 440 CLARKSVILLE 728 715 702 689 680 680 CLARKSVILLE CITY 116 129 143 158 179 209 CLAUDE 262 270 261 250 247 240 CLEAR LAKE SHORES 282 287 289 287 287 289 CLEBURNE 6,027 6,680 7,343 8,097 9,046 9,879 CLEVELAND 1,341 1,365 1,392 1,416 1,464 1,529 CLIFTON 709 773 819 824 827 837 CLINT 270 268 268 267 267 267 CLUTE 1,181 1,214 1,265 1,291 1,349 1,425 CLYDE 305 297 278 259 245 238 COAHOMA 183 185 183 180 177 177 COCKRELL HILL 653 687 681 670 667 668 COLDSPRING 207 237 261 275 282 286 COLEMAN 1,285 1,269 1,252 1,235 1,223 1,223 COLLEGE STATION 20.032 22,977 25,779 27,844 30.432 31,342 COLLEYVILLE 8,123 9,190 9,127 9,096 9,064 9,064 `AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/7/2011 3:38 :31 PM Page 7 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 COLLINSVILLE 324 441 558 666 780 899 COLMESNEIL 72 80 84 84 83 83 COLORADO CITY 997 980 949 914 879 826 COLUMBUS 1,026 1,099 1,128 1,113 1,153 1,206 COMANCHE 634 632 622 605 587 568 COM BE S 208 229 256 281 309 341 COMBINE 282 356 405 463 537 635 COMMERCE 1,418 1,503 1,644 1,862 2,397 3,248 COMO 90 100 108 114 114 114 CONROE 11,262 14,588 18,512 22,987 28,860 35,846 CONVERSE 1,907 2,331 2,729 3,044 3,311 3,564 COOLIDGE 95 103 108 110 114 120 COOPER 391 418 442 465 462 462 COPPELL 11,544 11,500 11.447 11,434 11,417 11,440 COPPER CANYON 357 432 507 582 661 740 COPPERAS COVE 3,643 4,152 4,601 4,902 5,195 5,477 CORINTH 4,665 5,269 5,679 6.085 6.519 6,845 CORPUS CHRISTI 61,953 68,212 73,592 78,422 82,961 86,962 CORRIGAN 270 320 358 378 389 408 CORSICANA 6,200 6,381 6,564 6,763 7,083 7,518 COTTONWOOD SHORES 164 336 524 739 978 1,268 COTULLA 1,407 1,516 1,566 1,615 1,677 1,743 CRANDALL 7301 1,004 1,258 1,544 1,909 2,362 CRANE 940 1,002 1,028 1,045 1,072 1,105 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 41712011 3:38:31 PM Page 8 of 41 CITY WATER CITY NAME DEMAND 2010 REGIONAL A PROJECTIONS 2020 r PLAN FOR r 2030 060 2040 2050 2060 CRAWFORD 65 67 68 69 70 73 CRESSON 111 134 162 195 237 290 CROCKETT 1,438 1.449 1.480 1,512 1,563 1.615 CROSBYTON 369 386 394 402 400 394 CROSS PLAINS 1167 164 160 157 154 154 CROSS ROADS 575 1,234 1,230 1,230 1,230 1,230 CROWELL 277 264 252 241 233 224 CROWLEY 1,667 1,977 2,478 3,310 3,976 4,322 CRYSTAL CITY 2,247 2,272 2,343 2,337 2,349 2,370 CUERO 1,249 1,257 1,250 1.232 1,198 1,177 CUMBY 100 108 114 118 117 117 CUSHING 129 135 140 147 162 179 CUT AND SHOOT 210 235 285 348 430 529 DAINGERFIEI_D 417 408 400 392 386 386 DAISETTA 149 152 154 156 160 167 DALHART 2,005 2,132 2,208 2,229 2,1.88 2,083 DALLAS 374,848 399,421 416,979 442,190 486,268 567,304 DALWORTHINGTON GARDEN'S 771 816 847 862 874 884 DANBURY 211 222 231 238 250 265 DAWSON 177 185 195 204 219 238 DAYTON 1,737 2,161 2,553 2,924 3,355 3,855 DE KALB 258 268 277 290 290 290 QE LEON 280 280 274 265 256 248 DE SOTO 10,355 12,375 14,162 15,807 97,741 18,271 'AN ACFT 15 THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/712011 3:38:31 PM Rage 9 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 DECATUR 1,639 2,011 2,748 3,537 4.580 5,385 OECORDOVA 593 592 591 592 597 608 DEER PARK 4,364 4,370 4,401 4,424 4,514 4,641 DEL RIO 12,898 13,817 14,646 15.314 15.855 16,281 DENISON 5,489 6,053 6,385 6,493 6.667 6.875 DENTON 24,612 34,884 45,594 58,158 71,679 98,275 DENVER CITY 1,043 1,126 1,172 1,220 1,181 1,141 DEPORT 100 107 113 120 120 120 DETROIT 100 100 100 100 100 100 DEVINE 837 850 856 862 878 896 DIBOLL 968 1,123 1,310 1,554 1,901 2,377 DICKINSON 3,085 3,416 3,586 3,620 3,657 3,699 O ILLEY 1,229 1,409 1.555 1,683 1,774 1.825 DIM MITT 1.041 1,103 1,137 1,159 1,150 1.130 DONNA 2,461 2,755 3,073 3,431 3,843 4,2.93 DOUBLE OAK 716 706 699 696 692 692 DRIPPING SPRINGS 1,080 1,856 2,297 2,745 3,300 3,736 DRISCOLL 122 148 171 191 208 224 DUBLIN 485 516 544 576 682 753 DUMAS 2,734 2,962 3.163 3,322 3,419 3,478 DUNCANVILLE 7,605 7,563 7,522 7,439 7,356 7,356 EAGLE LAKE 573 604 614 599 619 648 EAGLE PASS 5,429 5.743 6,069 6,358 6,693 7,020 EARLY 799 812 810 801 797 797 *AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/712011 3:38:31 PM Page 10 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2058 2060 EARTH 257 268 277 283 280 275 EAST BERNARD 277 285 286 282 279 276 EAST MOUNTAIN 165 166 175 185 191 201 EAST TAWAKONI 175 196 216 237 259 282 EASTLANJD 918 908 878 841 806 769 EASTON 83 99 114 130 153 189 ECTOR 96 99 101 102 104 107 EDCOUCH 540 599 666 743 831 927 EDEN 559 572 569 562 559 559 EDGECLIFF 460 451 443 434 428 428 EDGEWOOD 183 188 191 195 200 205 EDINBURG 9,227 11,617 14,414 17,248 20,594 24,023 EDNA 816 850 861 856 855 855 EL CAMPO 1,933 2,001 2,028 2,024 2,010 1,989 EL CENIZO 671 968 1,302 1,664 2.074 2,506 EL LAGO 534 524 513 503 496 496 EL FASO 92.829 104,503 114,750 123,586 132,423 141,260 ELDORADO 581 644 671 675 691 711 ELECTRA 575 550 539 531 526 527 ELGIN 1,672 2,295 2,866 3.725 4.428 5,320 ELKHART 177 183 185 188 192 196 ELMENDORF 112 123 132 140 148 156 ELSA 1,181 1,237 1,306 1,380 1,476 1,582 EMORY 197 218 240 260 284 309 'AN ACF-T IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 138-131 PM Page 11 of 41 CITY NAME 2014 2420 2034 2040 2050 2060 ENCINAL 110 109 108 106 107 107 ENN IS 3,457 4,358 5,504 6,949 8,834 11,308 EULESS 9,698 10,760 11.158 11,308 11.377 1 1,4A3 EUSTACE 146 143 140 138 137 137 EVERMAN 771 798 776 754 747 747 FAIRCHILDS 406 515 650 787 971 1,182 FAIRFIELD 829 988 1,146 1,298 1,461 1,588 FAIROAKS RANCH 1.434 1.448 1,455 1,464 1,467 1,479 FAIRVIEW 3,469 3,992 5.012 6,593 6,593 6,593 FALFURRIAS 2,135 2,515 2,795 2.957 3,021 3,032 FALLS CITY 113 122 131 138 142 145 FARMERS BRANCH 11,229 12,109 12,883 13,603 14,286 14,945 FARME.RSVILLE 627 1,176 1.680 2,520 3,696 5,041 FARWELL 388 405 410 408 393 371 FATE 2,091 3,968 4,943 5,842 6,496 6.945 FERRIS 401 447 495 555 630 700 FLATONIA 339 368 394 411 434 468 FLORENCE 242 283 332 386 447 515 FLORESVILLE 1,805 2,011 2,245 2,475 2,726 3,000 FLOWER MOUND 17,325 23,189 32.085 32,085 32,085 32,085 FLOYDADA 680 696 693 685 657 623 FOREST HILL 1,492 1,584 1,671 1,776 1,912 2,008 FORNEY 2.097 4,033 4,973 5,763 6,422 7,048 FORT BLISS 10,953 12,359 12,359 12,359 12,359 12,359 "AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325.851 GALLONS 4!712011 3:38:31 PM Page 12 of 41 CITY WATER CITY NAME 2011 DEMAND 2010 REGIONAL WATER PROJECTIONS 2020 PLAN FOR 2010 - 2030 2060 (IN ACFT*) 2040 2050 2060 FORT DAVIS 343 403 444 484 52.4 565 FORT HOOD 8,573 8,460 8,347 8,234 8,158 8,158 FORT STOCKTON 3,267 3,397 3,461 3,481 3,479 3,411 FORT WORTH 175.513 220,412 271,349 330,773 401,222 489.088 FRANKLIN 344 373 389 397 396 395 FRANKSTON 524 547 564 582 598 612 FREDERICKSBURG 3,113 3,583 3,798 3,765 3,749 3,749 FREEPORT 1,892 2,192 2,498 2,763 3,065 3,410 FREER 645 659 663 655 633 600 FRIENDSWOOD 4,276 4,537 4,631 4,590 4,610 4,651 FRIONA 835 872 879 870 838 791 FRISCO 36,153 47,910 62,450 77,983 88,760 88,760 FRITCH 411 418 414 4073 382 364 FROST 69 67 66 63 63 63 FULSHEAR 349 441 554 668 819 997 FULTON 307 346 365 359 336 318 GAINESVILLE 3,387 3,746 4,171 4,578 5,02.7 5,522 GALENA PARK 1,231 1,234 1,245 1,252 1,285 1,332 GALVESTON 16.095 15,903 15,711 15,518 15,390 15.390 GANADO 259 272 277 276 276 276 GARDEN RIDGE 565 703 860 1,018 1,181 1,360 GARLAND 42,484 42,055 42,789 42,462 42,190 42,190 GARRISON 149 147 144 141 139 139 GATESVILLE 3409 4.139 4,850 5,356 5,787 6,163 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 3:38:31 PM Page 13 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2x50 2060 GEORGE WEST 703 754 767 738 675 608 GEORGETOWN 10,342 13,956 18,187 22,826 27,979 33,506 G HOLSO N 150 169 184 202 213 231 GIDDINGS 1.106 1,258 1,382 1,476 1,564 1,645 GILMER 1,138 1,202 1,250 1.275 1.299 1,338 GLADEWATER 1,258 1,269 1,264 1,259 1.266 1,283 GLEN ROSE 659 728 785 817 830 836 GLENN HEIGHTS 1,407 1,674 1,961 2,247 2,528 2,834 GODLEY 167 206 250 295 355 429 GOLDTHWAITE 569 621 629 623 617 616 GOLIAD 416 480 527 553 577 594 GONZALES 1,545 1.644 1.710 1,756 1,765 1,759 GORMAN 137 134 127 120 113 108 GRAFORD 65 65 64 64 65 67 GRAHAM 1,528 1,531 1,503 1,456 1,415 1,402 GRANBURY 2,795 3.456 4,058 4708 5,524 6,485 GRAND PRAIRIE 29,134 33.266 38,426 43,251 48,325 48,325 GRAND SALINE 627 671 705 731 769 817 GRANDVIEW 230 281 342 334 331 331 GRANGER 207 219 234 248 268 293 GRANITE SHOALS 424 535 658 775 844 925 GRAPELAND 264 2615 2701 275 283 294 GRAPEVINE 17.256 18,298 19,827 19,692 19,625 19.625 GREENVILLE 5.555 5.641 5,750 6,009 6,737 7,915 *AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4f712011 3:38:31 PM Wage 14 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 GREGORY 239 231 223 216 210 210 GROESBECK 760 923 1,0306 1.071 1,135 1,229 GROOM 142 143 142 138 125 114 GROVES 3,190 3,137 3,085 3,031 2,996 2,995 GROVETON 233 247 249 241 231 222 GRUVER 325 327 329 332 333 334 GUN BARREL CITY 1,408 1,629 1,840 2,071 2,352 2,720 GUNTER 271 467 655 837 1,022 1.149 HACKBERRY 142 210 275 304 319 326 HALE CENTER 470 493 509 513 507 498 HALLETTSVILLE 627 621 680 787 914 1,067 HALLSBURG 139 150 158 166 172 182 HALLSVILLE 429 501 553 592 638 705 HALTOM CITY 6,521 7,835 8,142 8,231 8,272 8,324 HAMILTON 554 542 531 521 513 513 HAMLIN 362 363 355 342 327 314 HAPPY 120 127 133 137 141 141 HARDIN 136 155 172 191 211 235 HARKER HEIGHTS 3.904 4,959 5,800 6,507 6,+698 6,815 HARLINGEN 11,795 13,306 14,814 16,364 17,998 19,662 HART 238 251 258 262 260 256 HASKELL 559 538 518 503 487 472 HASLET 784 1,555 2,697 2,689 2,682 2,662 HAWKINS 357 395 414 412 410 410 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF "WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!712011 3.38:31 PM Page 15 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2660 HAWLEY 169 170 168 164 158 151 H EARN E 1,124 1,108 1,093 1,077 1,066 1,066 HEATH 1,952 2,727 3,393 4,116 4,964 5,980 4 IEBBRONVILLE 731 759 780 792 778 748 HEBRON 114 111 110 109 109 109 HEDWIG VILLAGE 831 824 816 806 803 803 HELOTES 1,537 2,249 2,820 3,264 3,679 4,047 HEMPHILL 371 382 389 397 406 418 HEMPSTEAD 1,457 2,052 2,694 3,427 4,294 5,313 HENDERSON 2,417 2,396 2,367 2,333 2,320 2,351 HENRIETTA 720 701 677 638 592 553 HEREFORD 3,634 3,694 3,751 3,788 3.801 3,813 HEWITT 2,029 2,237 2,395 2,571 2,684 2,877 HICKORY CREEK 753 1,004 1,158 1,405 1,405 1,405 RICO 302 297 292 288 285 285 HIDALGO 1,114 1,515 1,945 2,418 2,961 3,517 HIGHLAND PARK 4,255 4,266 4,274 4,278 4,289 4,319 HIGHLAND VILLAGE 3,733 4,100 4,302 4,2955 4,274 4,274 HILL COUNTRY VILLAGE 838 835 831 828 826 826 HILLCREST 125 126 126 127 130 133 HILLSBORO 1,819 1,862 1,911 1,957 2,030 2,123 HILSHIRE VILLAGE 191 188 185 183 182 182 HITCHCOCK 933 935 930 914 911 915 HOLIDAY LAKES 92 91 90 89 90 94 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/7/2011 3:38 :31 PM Page 16 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 HOLLAND 125 121 117 114 111 111 HOLLIDAY 249 258 266 267 255 246 HOLLYWOOD PARK 2,314 2,389 2,458 2,511 2,565 2,616 HONDO 1,784 2.001 2,205 2,374 2,548 2,717 HONEY GROVE 421 466 546 645 749 856 HOOKS 416 443 465 486 486 486 HOUSTON 389,082 429,218 467,036 506,047 547,787 593,096 HOW E 403 590 837 1,085 1,237 1,365 HUBBARD 194 188 183 177 173 173 HUDSON 579 732 931 1,168 1.518 1.982 HUDSON OAKS 394 475 576 674 771 867 HUGHES SPRINGS 443 454 462 472 470 470 HUMBLE 3,664 4,062 4,456 4.857 5.274 5,715 HUNTERS CREEK VILLAGE 1.747 1,866 1,981 2,091 2,212 2,344 HUNTINGTON 243 262 288 325 380 457 HUNTSVILLE 7,687 9,205 9,365 9,185 9,132 9,136 HURST 7,524 7,807 7,670 7,532 7,486 7,486 HUTCHINS 821 1,008 1,255 1,624 2,123 3,497 HUTTO 1.689 2,290 3,001 3,766 4,627 5.550 IDALOU 289 288 281 274 273 272 INDIAN LAKE 49 57 66 76 85 95 INGLESIDE 1.294 1,771 2.202 2,607 3,016 3,394 INGLESIDE ON THE BAY 92 112 130 148 164 181 I N GRAM 220 238 242 229 212 200 `AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 41712011 338:31 PM Page 17 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 IOWA COLONY 108 118 126 135 145 156 IOWA PARK 1,210 1,184 1,176 1,169 1,163 1,170 IRAAN 452 469 478 480 479 470 IRVING 58,202 66,967 70,502 73,780 76.256 78,1267 ITALY 282 330 362 397 439 489 ITASCA 225 219 212 206 202 201 JACINTO CITY 1,301 1,346 1,410 1,455 1,526 1,612 JACKSBORO 688 699 697 686 680 680 JACKSONVILLE 3,502 3,637 3,741 3,827 3,948 4,111 JAMAICA BEACH 300 344 368 377 383 389 JARRELL 208 210 212 216 219 207 JASPER 1,602 1,682 1,714 1,699 1,688 1,688 JAYTON 112 108 95 75 66 57 JEFFERSON 379 376 369 362 357 357 JERSEY VILLAGE 1,586 1,880 2,170 2,464 2,753 3,056 JEWETT 202 237 256 255 251 254 JOAQUIN 148 155 158 1604 163 168 JOHNSON CITY 382 445 503 554 601 657 JONES CREEK 98 91 84 76 72 72 JONESTOWN 467 548 625 700 751 809 JOSEPHINE 259 346 415 499 580 668 JOSHUA 801 882 968 1,068 1,202 1,377 JOURDANTON 801 861 914 955 994 1,026 JUNCTION 936 935 926 917 910 910 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 3 :38:31 PM Page 18 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 JUSTIN 587 1,012 1,614 2,636 3,218 3,551 KARNES CITY 432 453 474 492 503 512 KATY 3,755 4,646 5,582 6,549 7,566 8,674 KAUFMAN 1,322 1,716 2,013 2,264 2,511 3,029 KEENE 6201 705 798 896 1.028 1,202 KELLER 9,124 10,138 11,495 11,380 11,380 11,380 KEMAH 278 322 348 3563 360 366 KEMP 224 267 347 304 296 296 KEMPN E R 300 366 411 446 467 482 KENDLETON 151 194 251 324 418 539 KENEDY 763 826 874 912 961 993 KENEFICK 94 112 128 144 152 183 KENNEDALE 1,255 1,594 1,756 1,867 1,937 1.992 KERENS 460 453 447 440 436 436 KERMIT 1,927 1,988 1,983 1,966 1,922 1,860 KERRVILLF 4,362 4,746 - 4,918 4,937 5,152 5,262 KILGORE 2,437 2,493 2,562 2,644 2,799 3,D41 KILLEEN 19,530 25,462 27,,985 30,141 32,207 34,432 KINGSVILLE 4,574 4,601 4,604 4,569 4,616 4,619 KIRBY 1,005 1,004 1,007 1,001 1,013 1,034 KIRBYVILLE 474 494 506 501 499 499 KNOX CITY 225 - 229 225 222 219 216 KOSSE 75 75 74 73 73 74 KOUNTZE 346 323 326 328 336 348 'AN ACTT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 3:38:31 PM Page 19 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2420 2030 2040 2050 2060 KRESS 104 104 105 103 100 96 KRUGERVILLE 204 228 257 331 428 613 KRU M 6140 721 773 838 945 1,066 KYLE 2,740 3,940 4.217 4,377 4,874 5203 LA FERIA 855 1,031 1,214 1,403 1,587 1,777 LA GRANGE 963 1,129 1,264 1,362 1,483 1.656 LA GRULLA 867 919 976 1,038 1,104 1,175 LA J OYA 447 519 596 683 781 890 LA MARQUE 2,161 2,115 2,069 2,023 1,992 1,992 LA PORTE 5,323 5,673 6,078 6,412 6,830 7,298 LA VERNIA 278 367 464 557 658 764 LA VILLA 244 242 241 239 239 242 LACKLAND AFB 3,104 3,080 3,056 3,032 3,016 3.016 LACOSTE 205 222 239 251 265 281 LACY- LAKEVIEW 835 989 1,116 1,256 1,338 1,477 LADONIA 291 577 715 779 879 1,055 LAGO VISTA 2,260 2,702 3,142 3,536 3.830 4,124 LAGUNA VISTA 329 399 476 554 633 713 LAKE CITY 79 89 99 107 116 125 LAKE DALLAS 1,354 1,580 1,702 1,691 1,680 1,680 LAKE JACKSON 4,015 4,332 4.511 4.883 5,210 5,595 LAKE TANGLEWOOD 160 189 217 248 282 310 LAKE WORTH 930 1,010 1,102 1,190 1,290 1,344 LAKEPORT 152 173 196 222 260 316 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325.851 GALLONS 417/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 20 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 LAKESIDE 447 512 580 652 740 8461 LAKESIDE CITY 166 163 173 169 161 155 LAK!EWAY 4,750 5,682 6,582 7,407 8,023 8,641 LAMESA 2,540 2,573 2,602 2,603 2,529 2,433 LAM PASAS 1,842 2,016 2,119 2,174 2,223 2,082 LANCASTER 5,704 8,755 9,436 9,363 9,363 9,363 LAREDO 51,467 65,032 80,548 97,846 116,596 136,948 LAUGHLIN AFB 1,303 1,296 1,289 1,281 1,276 1,276 LEAGUE CITY 7,503 8,279 8,700 8,777 8,867 8,974 LEAN DER 3,887 5,380 7,119 9.028 11,156 13.439 LEARY 85 89 91 94 93 93 LEFQRS 86 85 83 80 75 70 LEON VALLEY 1,092 1,066 1,049 1,030 1,022 1,035 LEONARD 303 342 466 720 1,040 1,299 LEVELLAND 2,310 2,362 2,369 2,322 2,216 2,107 LEWISVILLE 19,262 21,316 23,505 26,050 29,516 33,612 LEXINGTON 270 305 334 357 378 397 LIBERTY 1,509 1,527 1,532 1,543 1,578 1,628 LIBERTY HILL 454 673 940 1,223 1,537 1,874 LINCOLN PARK 102 132 155 178 202 234 LINDALE 830 944 1,059 1,172 1,371 1,644 LINDEN 347 353 356 361 358 358 LINDSAY 154 161 164 162 160 160 LIPAN 171 239 333 467 656 924 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2011 3:38::31 PM Page 21 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 20301 2040 2050 2060 LITTLE ELM 4,731 6,061 7,348 8,321 8,321 8,321 LITTLE RIVER - ACADEMY 275 285 292 294 297 301 LITTLEFIELD 1,530 1,662 1,660 1,694 1,676 1,655 LIVE OAK 1,145 1,157 1,177 1,193 1,232 1,284 LIVINGSTON 2,137 2,517 2,802 3,006 3,212 3,423 LLANO 1,177 1,258 1,270 1,279 1,294 1,319 LOCKHART 2,451 3,094 3,629 4,180 4,725 5,285 LOCKNEY 242 244 240 234 224 212 LOG CABIN 96 128 144 142 141 141 LOMETA 130 141 147 152 155 159 LONE OAK 68 67 67 67 67 67 LOUIE STAR 267 261 256 250 246 246 LONGVIEW 10,671 101,812 11,029 11,397 12,149 13,225 LORAINE 85 82 79 75 71 67 LORENA 369 408 440 475 497 533 LORENZO 275 288 296 302 301 296 LOS FRESNOS 767 1,008 1,247 1,490 1,745 1,988 LOS INDIOS 230 271 311 354 396 439 L OTT 97 94 92 89 88 88 LOVELADY 75 75 76 76 78 81 LOWRY CROSSING 366 458 541 554 551 551 LUBBOCK 49,824 51,588 52,417 52,602 53,041 54,306 LUCAS 1,032 1,533 1,828 2,344 3,327 4,537 LUFKIN 7,546 8,444 9,446 10,565 11,951 13,599 *AN ACTT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!712011 3:38:31 PM Page 22 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 3024 2030 2040 2050 2060 LULING 1,067 1,210 1,299 1,384 1,486 1,594 LUMBERTON 1,430 1,515 1,544 1,573 1,615 1,673 LYFORD 333 351 368 382 398 412 LYTLE 479 490 500 507 517 526 MABANK 671 801 931 1,083 1,269 1,507 MADISONVILLE 781 815 837 856 881 908 MAGNOLIA 439 6014 800 1,015 1,302 1,643 MALAKOFF 348 361 372 383 404 434 MANOR 1,356 1,601 1,834 2,051 2,213 2,378 MANSFIELD 13,632 19,020 24,481 29,385 33,043 36,701 MANVEL 5216 511 496 480 470 470 MARBLE FALLS 2,497 3,211 3,976 4,719 5,154 5,653 MARFA 886 969 1,060 1,049 1,042 1,042 MARION 164 179 194 209 229 251 MARLIN 2,660 2,749 2,839 2,913 2,983 3,076 MARSHALL 3,257 3,213 3,186 3,206 3,229 3,265 MART 335 354 367 383 394 415 MARTINDALE 125 134 139 143 150 158 MASON 742 739 733 727 722 723 MATADOR 234 224 207 187 174 166 MATHIS 648 632 615 598 586 586 MAUD 144 153 161 168 168 168 MAYPEARL 195 238 282 276 272 272 MCALLEN 29,801 34,930 40,903 47,260 54,363 61,885 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4[712011 3:38:31 PM Page 23 of 41 CITY CITY NAME WATER DEMAND 2010 REGIONAL PROJECTIONS 2020 PLAN FOR 2010 - 2030 2060 (IN ACFT*) 2040 2050 2060 MCCAMEY 559 606 621 629 648 888 MCGREGOR 933 923 913 902 894 899 CKINNEY 34,366 53,767 73.929 94,092 102157 102,157 MCLEAN 185 183 178 171 161 151 MCLENDON- CHISHOLM 272 296 320 347 396 467 MEADOW 73 75 78 80 79 79 MEADOWLAKES 879 1,137 1,418 1,691 1.853 2,431 MEADOWS 2,075 2,044 2,021 1,998 1,989 1,989 MELISSA 807 4,972 7,527 10,753 15.055 16,570 MEMPHIS 442 441 440 440 440 442 MENARD 354 353 347 341 339 339 MERCEDES 2,055 2,163 2,298 2,440 2,634 2,852 MERIDIAN 229 242 249 247 247 250 MERKEL 458 469 469 462 450 436 MERTZON 129 130 124 114 147 102 MESQUITE 26,245 30,312 33,874 34,469 34.521 34,532 MEXIA 1,2.50 1,289 1,328 1,358 1,408 1,479 MIAMI 145 149 134 112 97 88 MIDLAND 28,939 30,056 30,844 31,246 31,631 32,112 MIDLOTHIAN 3,438 6,765 9,174 11,151 13,178 15.206 MILES 150 153 173 183 193 203 MILFORD 132 130 127 125 122 122 M I N E O LA 1,067 1,176 1,229 1,223 1,2161 1,216 MINERAL WELLS 3,653 3,802 3,92.8 4,008 4,151 4,337 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4,7i2011 3:38:31 PM Page 24 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 20160 MISSION 11,065 14,063 17,419 20,960 25,064 29,269 MISSOURI CITY 15,862 19,589 23,349 27,226 30,188 36,466 MONAHANS 2,559 2,592 2,597 2,572 2,564 2,564 MONT BELVIEU 983 1,278 1,549 1,785 2.030 2,281 MONTGOMERY 249 1,019 1,437 1,970 2,442 2,927 MOODY 202 203 203 204 206 212 MORGAN 74 86 99 115 133 156 MORGA'NS POINT RESORT 473 520 563 591 607 623 MORTON 535 560 565 547 521 496 MOULTON 158 155 147 137 127 118 MOUNT ENTERPRISE 71 71 70 68 69 73 MOUNT PLEASANT 3,116 3,349 3,543 3,788 4,039 4.313 MOUNT VERNON 397 449 479 511 507 507 MOUNTAIN CITY 163 187 214 239 272 298 MUENSTER 339 351 366 379 395 414 MULESHOE 1,027 1,082 1,109 1.137 1 .135 1,114 MUNDAY 267 265 260 255 251 250 MURCHISON 139 148 157 166 179 196 MURPHY 4,234 8,556 8,556 8,556 8,556 8.555 MUSTANG RIDGE 253 319 377 429 481 534 NACOGDOCHES 7,625 8,423 9,218 9,939 11,352 12,540 NAPLES 188 183 181 181 181 181 NASH 303 323 339 355 355 355 NASSAU BAY 1,028 1,014 1,000 986 976 976 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/7/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 25 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 NATALIA 330 374 415 450 485 519 NAVASOTA 1,426 1,464 1,494 1,505 1,526 1,555 NEDERLAND 4,125 4,268 4,387 4,456 4.573 4,834 NEEDVILLE 457 553 672 794 963 1,164 NEVADA 247 528 631 1,254 2,0901 5,226 NEW BOSTON 1,135 1,191 1,229 1,265 1,258 1,258 NEW BRAUNFELS 10,509 13,213 16,350 19,457 22,667 26,226 NEW CHAPEL HILL 118 127 137 146 163 187 NEW DEAL 149 165 173 173 178 173 NEW FAIRVIEW 201 272 340 409 488 579 NEW HOPE 267 383 632 944 1,416 3,148 NEW LONDON 225 228 230 228 232 248 NEW SUMMERFJELD 208 258 302 338 379 427 NEW WAVERLY 218 235 243 236 235 235 NEWARK 154 232 301 418 564 787 NEWCASTLE. 59 57 55 53 51 51 NEWTON 480 495 489 497 509 524 NIEDERWALD 130 190 255 316 389 449 NIXON 438 460 479 488 490 4€38 NOCONA 693 681 671 664 657 660 NOLANVILLE 349 359 365 365 369 374 NOME 127 136 144 150 157 172 NOONDAY 102 105 107 110 117 12.7 NORMANGEE 158 174 183 180 179 181 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 26 of 41 CITY DAME 2010 2024 2030 2040 2050 2060 NORTH RICHLAND HILLS 12,496 13,832 14.753 15,300 15,693 16,022 NORTHLAKE 268 808 934 1,796 2,658 3,197 O'DONNELL 161 163 159 155 147 137 OAK GROVE 124 148 172 201 236 283 OAK LEAF 338 393 448 503 567 640 OAK POINT 585 1,377 2,067 2,318 2.585 2,868 OAK RIDGE NORTH 683 748 897 1,067 1,297 1,.573 ODEM 330 347 361 372 389 408 ODESSA 21,927 22,687 23,350 24,145 25.222 26,484 OLD RIVER- WINFREE 208 225 238 248 263 280 OLMOS PARK 403 424 441 452 468 484 OLNEY 707 685 667 647 631 625 OLTON 492 512 532 542 536 529 OMAHA 146 142 139 135 133 133 ONALASKA 189 229 260 281 302 325 ORANGE 3,801 3,738 3,675 3,613 3,571 3,571 ORANGE GROVE 374 394 405 406 402 393 ORE CITY 201 221 232 239 245 255 OVERTON 439 455 460 460 476 522 OVILLA 992 1,550 2.099 2,648 2,784 2,985 OYSTER CREEK 166 188 210 229 251 277 PADUCAH 316 300 277 256 239 232 PALACIOS 745 777 787 789 782 782 PALESTINE 3,717 3,837 3,920 4,004 4,099 4,202 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4!712011 3:38:31 PM Page 27 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 PALM VALLEY 412 407 400 393 389 387 PALMER 271 282 293 303 320 342 PALMHU RST 1,157 1,789 2,497 3,263 4.099 4,957 PALMVI EW 869 1,199 1,570 1.967 2,414 2,873 PAMPA 3,300 3,273 3,182 3,058 2,871 2,689 PANHANDLE 574 579 575 556 506 459 PANORAMA VILLAGE 654 682 710 743 776 811 PANTEGO 701 693 685 685 672 672 PARADISE 73 89 109 134 165 202 PARIS 6,252 6,628 6.9601 7,277 7.239 7,239 PARKER 1,494 4,078 5.950 9,669 14.132 19,338 PASADENA 20,465 22,321 24,009 25,790 27,740 29,927 PATTON VILLAGE 87 88 101 115 136 165 PAYNE SPRINGS 165 174 182 191 203 220 PEARLAND 12,410 15,438 18,087 20,595 23,398 26,313 PEA,RSALL 1,443 1.448 1,449 1,435 1,442 1,449 PECAN HILL 160 183 205 228 254 285 PECOS 2,810 3,064 3,261 3,413 3,573 3,712 PELICAN BAY 166 214 268 290 320 359 PENITAS 157 160 161 165 171 180 PERRYTON 1,960 2,135 2,265 2,353 2,396 2,451 PETERSBURG 289 304 313 316 312 306 PETROLIA 95 92 90 84 73 73 PFLUGERVILLE 6,899 8,204 9,505 10,664 11,552 12,441 *AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4f712011 3:38:31 PN Page 28 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 PHARR 9,420 11,550 13,948 16,595 19,445 22,491 PILOT POINT 763 1,124 1.895 2,069 2,195 2,335 PINE FOREST 73 71 69 67 65 65 PINE ISLAND 117 146 177 210 254 305 PINEHURST 336 329 321 313 308 308 PINELAND 221 227 230 232 237 244 PINEY POINT VILLAGE 1,275 1,317 1,360 1,402 1,451 1,506 PITTSBURG 899 924 950 965 985 1,012 PLAINS 416 448 468 488 473 457 PLAINVIEV'V 4,288 4,490 4,605 4,635 4.577 4,488 PLANO 75,208 76,828 77,318 77,570 77,818 78,097 PLEAK 547 646 770 895 1,063 1,256 PLE,ASANTON 1,906 1,969 2.027 2,063 2,109 2,1151 PLUM GROVE 141 176 207 240 277 319 POINT 125 139 157 174 191 208 POINT BLANK 85 96 104 108 111 112 POINT COMFORT 224 323 500 677 667 667 PONDER 250 913 1,815 2,903 3,357 3,448 PORT ARANSAS 2,606 3,655 4,558 5,355 6,068 6,637 PORT ARTHUR 9,704 9,510 9,315 9,122 8,993 8,993 PORT ISABEL 2,645 2,846 3,052 3,254 3,470 3,681 PORT LAVACA 1,769 1,877 1,981 2,079 2,2'09 2,345 PORT NECHES 1,782 1,782 1,789 1,780 1,804 1,882 PORTLAND 2,399 2,868 3,290 3,715 4,106 4,498 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417/2011 3:38:31 PM Wage 29 of 41 CITY CITY NAME i WATER DEMAND 2010 REGIONAL PROJECTIONS 2820 PLAN FOR 2010 - 2030 2060 (IN ACFT*) 201+40 2058 2060 POST 631 642 616 579 549 512 POST OAK BEND CITY 85 138 226 369 602 982 POTEET 735 741 740 740 745 752 POTH 348 389 434 480 530 585 POTTSBORO 504 851 1,176 1,492 1,811 1,976 PRAIRIE VIEW 1,253 1,344 1,451 1,574 1,729 1,916 PREMONT 858 905 931 935 925 905 PRESIDIO 1,039 1,255 1,458 1,642 1,727 1,781 PRIMERA 609 732 856 989 1,121 1,255 PRINCETON 1,329 2,657 3,871 6,452 10,753 16,130 PROGRESO 576 717 867 1,037 1,234 1,436 PROSPER 1,998 5,399 9.448 13,498 18,897 20,247 QUANAH 543 510 491 453 426 386 QUEEN CITY 231 236 236 239 237 237 Q U I N LAN 177 178 180 182 187 195 QUITMAN 471 522 545 542 539 539 RALLS 304 315 322 325 323 318 RANCHO VIEJO 320 311 305 297 295 292 RANGER 316 308 294 278 263 252 RANKIN 231 245 248 250 255 261 RANSOM CANYON 440 569 698 825 953 1,004 RAYMONDVILLE 1 ,681 1,701 1,715 1,717 1 ,730 1,743 RED LICK 129 135 139 143 142 142 RED OAK 2,366 4,022 4,922 5,269 5,612 5,986 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 417!2411 3 :38:31 PM Page 30 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 REDWATER 128 133 136 143 143 143 REFUGIO 645 709 723 763 787 777 RENO (LAMAR) 557 628 699 754 814 873 RENO (PARKER) 319 321 322 321 327 337 RHOM E 590 955 1,541 2,151 2,760 3,369 RICE 229 265 304 347 398 463 RICHARDSON 32,383 36.123 35,993 35,602 35,343 35,343 RICHLAND HILLS 1,327 1,381 1,441 1,511 1,558 1,580 RICHMOND 2,252 2,324 2.764 3,189 3,915 4,717 RICHWOOD 341 354 363 370 386 408 RIESEL 109 116 120 126 129 137 RIO BRAVO 1.090 1,490 1,924 2,409 2,958 3,536 RIO GRANDE CITY 2,962 3.234 3,545 3,840 4,171 4,513 RIO HONDO 429 459 490 520 556 593 RIO VISTA 71 77 85 93 105 122 RISING STAR 74 71 67 63 59 56 RIVER OAKS 1,010 986 954 931 923 923 ROANOKE 1,756 2,732 3,538 4,348 5.787 7,013 ROBERT LEE 351 346 342 338 336 336 ROBINSON 1,268 1,462 1.611 1,75+6 1.857 2,030 ROBSTOWN 2.110 2,067 2,024 1,982 1,953 1,953 ROBY 76 75 75 74 74 76 ROCKDALE 1,254 1,287 1,310 1,325 1,332 1.337 ROCKPORT 1,590 1,778 1,868 1,823 1,712 1,620 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4f712011 3:38:.31 PM Page 31 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 ROCKSPRINGS 272 279 268 256 250 240 ROCKWALL 9,855 17.597 21,596 25162 25,826 25,826 ROGERS 195 191 188 184 181 181 ROLLINGWOOD 377 376 374 372 371 373 ROMA CITY 2,946 3,333 3,737 4,156 4,585 5.017 ROMAN FOREST 544 839 1.192 1,568 2,073 2,677 ROPESVILLE 89 91 91 89 85 81 ROSCOE 189 190 188 182 173 165 ROSE CITY 84 83 81 79 78 78 ROSEBUD 171 166 161 156 152 152 ROSENBERG 5.156 6,405 7,932 9,502 11.637 14.171 ROTAN 278 271 249 231 222 2.03 ROUND ROCK 23,5€72 31.751 41,496 52,085 63,837 76.435 ROWLETT 11,619 13,731 15,447 16,8011 17,759 18,694 ROX TON 97 104 111 118 118 118 ROYSE CITY 2,501 4,422 5,959 7,789 9,561 11,521 RULE 81 77 72 69 66 62 RUNAWAY BAY 296 356 430 489 547 608 RUNGE 195 209 219 227 238 247 RUSK 1,194 1,283 1,353 1,421 1,495 1,591 SABINAL 407 403 398 393 389 389 SACHSE 4,399 5,124 5,806 5.746 5,746 5,746 SAGINAW 3,161 3,755 4,176 4,489 4,705 4,885 SAINT JO 49 101 98 97 96 96 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACME WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4f7I2011 3:38:31 PM Page 32 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SAINT PAUL 192 468 930 1,479 1,756 1,848 SAN ANGELO 20,800 21,418 21,734 21,744 21,907 21,969 SAN ANTONIO 216,946 241,730 265,369 283,229 300,501 317,727 SAN AUGUSTINE 915 925 939 957 979 999 SAN BENITO 4,916 5A84 6,054 6,630 7,241 7,863 SAN DIEGO 582 587 585 572 552 527 SAN EDZARIO 1,924 2,858 3,718 4,405 5,138 5.871 SAN FELIPE 124 145 159 167 170 176 SAN JUAN 3,501 4.655 5,956 7,384 9,031 10,720 SAN LEANNA 1003 120 140 158 171 184 SAN MARCOS 8,0738 11,198 14,371 17,824 21,559 24,439 SAN PERLITA 105 112 117 120 124 126 SAN SABA 884 877 869 862 856 856 SANCTUARY 92 216 314 370 426 478 SANDE RSON 200 205 201 198 197 197 SANGER 1,302 2.114 2,935 3,476 3.871 4,033 SANSOM PARK VILLAGE 603 609 609 605 608 615 SANTA ANNA 200 197 193 190 187 187 SANTA CLARA 220 349 492 629 786 954 SANTA FE 988 990 982 956 951 956 SANTA ROSA 331 376 429 478 531 588 SAVOY 108 108 106 105 107 109 SCHERTZ 4,151 5,583 7,073 8,560 10,251 12,059 SCHULENBURG 644 733 801 853 919 1,012 `AN ACFT 1S THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/712011 3:38:31 PM Page 33 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 SCURRY 87 102 118 138 160 186 SEABROOK 2,421 2,867 3,288 3,731 4.166 4,620 SEADRIFT 252 255 257 256 257 258 SEAGOVILLE 2,085 2,542 3,019 3,480 3,890 4,191 SEAGRAVES 449 482 502 513 506 499 SEALY 1,275 1,635 1,883 2,000 2,060 2,163 SEGUIN 5,0118 5,718 6,454 7,203 8,069 9,047 SELMA 1.667 2.142 2.615 2.613 2,604 2,605 SEMINOLE 2,214 2,401 2,525 2,605 2,579 2,544 SEVEN POINTS 188 222 254 288 330 385 SEYMOUR 1611 548 504 460 432 387 SHADY SHORES 357 510 613 608 604 604 SHALLOWATER 344 367 377 371 379 371 SHAMROCK 312 312 311 313 313 309 SHAVANO PARK 819 835 847 856 868 880 SHENANDOAH 1.746 2,024 2,358 2,721 3,205 3,792 SHEPHERD 301 355 394 411 424 431 SHERMAN 10,081 11,240 12.696 14,348 16,586 19,804 SHINER 482 475 455 426 397 367 SHOREACRES 204 217 229 239 237 237 SIERRA BLANCA 123 130 134 132 131 131 SILSBEE 1,072 1,136 1,149 1,161 1,193 1,235 SILVERTON 128 128 123 115 111 108 SIMONTON 419 497 592 689 816 967 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325.851 GALLONS 41712011 3:38:31 PM Page 34 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2024 2030 2040 2050 2060 S I NTON 1,052 1,062 1,076 1,086 1,108 1,135 SKELLYTOWN 106 107 106 102 93 85 SLATON 907 889 870 849 837 836 SMITHVI LLE 904 1.233 1,551 2.018 2.398 2,884 SMYER 69 70 70 68 65 62 SNOOK 147 160 167 173 178 183 SNYDER 2,792 2,834 2.844 2,829 2.832 2,832 SOCORRO 2,959 3,466 3,977 4,361 4,795 5,230 SOMERSET 405 484 552 609 660 709 SOMERVILLE 328 344 353 358 364 372 SONORA 1,195 1,252 1,252 1,236 1,235 1,222 SOUR LADE 176 184 183 182 186 193 SOUTH 'HOUSTON 2,288 2.393 2.528 2,631 2,775 2,942 SOUTH PADRE ISLAND 2,504 3,136 3,789 4,443 5.095 5.722 SOUTHLAKE 9,321 9,826 9,949 10,514 11,259 11,855 SOUTHMAYD 160 197 258 380 565 703 SOUTHSIDE PLACE 406 433 458 482 510 540 SPEARMAN 707 745 776 811 831 849 SPLENDORA 188 224 297 383 502 640 SPRING VALLEY 888 915 944 972 1,008 1,049 SPRINGTOWN 504 659 807 961 1,113 1.272 SPUR 271 267 263 260 257 257 ST. HEDWIG 310 358 403 436 469 501 STAFFORD 1,751 2.277 2,892 3,538 4,448 5,486 `AN ACTT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 41712011 3:38:31' PM Page 35 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 STAGECOACH 79 106 144 194 265 365 STAMFORD 645 648 634 612 590 568 STANTON 411 440 447 448 433 411 STEPHENVILLE 2,717 2,850 2,957 1058 3,464 3,732 STERLING CITY 297 321 330 3301 319 324 STINNETT - 365 370 365 353 333 316 STOCKDALE 350 386 426 466 510 558 STRATFORD 628 683 705 727 746 756 STRAW N 160 164 167 170 176 183 SUDAN 226 236 244 249 246 243 SUGAR LAND 20,281 24,314 24,937 24,818 24,818 24,818 SULLIVAN CITY 526 672 845 1,016 1,226 1,440 SULPHUR SPRINGS 3,511 3,771 4,061 4,320 4,620 4,945 SUNDOWN 341 350 353 347 332 316 SUNNYVALE 1,770 2,454 3,135 3,820 4,514 4,618 SUNRAY 534 608 674 727 758 777 SUNRISE BEACH VILLAGE 200 215 217 218 221 225 SURFSIDE BEACH 168 189 209 228 248 271 SW E E NY 606 636 663 684 717 757 SWEETWATER 3,013 3,072 3,081 3,029 2,900 2,763 TAFT 586 619 648 672 703 735 TAHOKA 492 504 490 478 453 421 TALCO 95 93 91 89 88 88 TALTY 813 1,717 2,337 3,024 3,878 4,948 "AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4[712011 3:38:31 PM Page 36 of 41 CrtY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 TATU M 151 146 143 140 137 138 TAYLOR 2,913 3,279 3,705 4,183 4,727 5.342 TAYLOR LAKE VILLAGE 908 889 871 852 846 846 TEAGU E 536 720 773 839 906 982 TEMPLE 21,033 23,018 25,170 26,892 28,804 30,613 TENAHA 191 187 184 180 178 178 TERRELL 3,807 10,385 14,780 19,138 21,731 24,643 TERRELL HILLS 863 914 956 983 1.018 1,057 TEXARKANA 6,472 6,767 6.952 7,124 7,075 7,075 TEXAS CITY 6,476 6,383 6,269 6,138 6.051 6,1756 TEXLINE 211 227 237 240 235 224 THE COLONY 5.761 7,778 8,609 8.810 9,006 9,087 THE HILLS 567 733 733 729 729 729 THORNDALE 193 206 213 215 216 219 THORNTON 54 52 50 49 48 48 THRALL 140 165 196 228 263 304 THREE RIVERS 465 498 505 485 444 399 THROCKMORTON 232 222 209 191 177 168 TIKI ISLAND 243 282 303 311 316 321 TIMPSON 179 181 181 180 181 184 TI OGA 192 428 588 663 725 757 TOLAR 143 179 213 246 289 342 TOM BEAN 259 301 343 383 426 448 TOMBALL 2,621 3301 3,842 4,834 5,562 6,6301 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4(712011 3:38:31 PM Page 37 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2850 2060 TOOL 403 452 500 548 810 695 TRENTON 208 302 496 780 1,163 1.550 TRINIDAD 183 183 183 181 184 180 TRINITY 178 172 165 152 142 137 TROPHY CLUB 3.847 3.190 3.477 3.732 4.010 4.306 TROUP 292 303 318 329 359 401 TROY 185 181 176 171 188 188 TUL|A 1.050 1,065 1'0,72 1`084 1.038 883 TUSCC)LA 74 74 74 73 70 88 TYE 178 181 181 177 172 167 TYLER 25.888 28.849 27.778 28.675 30.815 33.334 UNIVERSAL CITY 2.808 2'918 3.175 3.125 3.101 3.101 UN|VERS|TYPARK 7.799 7.890 7,B4O 7.940 7,983 8.030 UVALDE 8.087 8.124 8'144 6'148 8.150 6178 VALLEY MILLS 206 208 314 317 320 224 VALLEY VIEW 187 383 584 808 1.371 1,714 VAN 488 642 581 825 673 731 VAWALSTYNE 504 1.411 2.510 3.142 3.419 3,549 VANHORN 839 880 907 905 081 901 VEGA 242 247 229 202 178 142 VENUS 383 358 340 34'4 342 342 VERNON 2'671 2.858 2'627 2.519 2.303 2,228 VICTORIA 11.924 12.858 13.104 73.530 13.930 14.380 V|DOR 1.025 1.619 1.595 1.581 1.582 1.572 *AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/7/2011 3:38:31 9M Page 38of41 CITY DAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 VINTON 399 614 798 962 1,125 1,291 WACO 24,876 26,453 27,781 29,159 30,033 31,304 WAELDER 154 175 190 202 204 203 WAKE VILLAGE 714 772 830 887 945 1,003 WALLER 535 642 762 893 1 ,042 1,213 WALLIS 178 194 202 207 209 214 WALNUT SPRINGS 97 100 101 100 99 100 WASKOM 305 343 370 391 415 450 WATAUGA 3,437 3,532 3,500 3,416 3,388 3,388 WAXAHACH IE 6,855 8,781 10,330 13,090 16,672 21,341 WEATHERFORD 5,509 6,617 7,607 8,554 9,561 10,741 WEBSTER 2,417 3,097 3,772 4,432 5,110 5,786 WEIMAR 363 383 391 382 395 414 WEIR 156 223 301 386 480 581 WELLINGTON 456 457 416 431 420 401 WELLS 122 121 119 117 115 116 WESLACO 5.901 6,658 7,523 8,481 9,565 10,731 WEST 459 467 475 482 490 506 WEST COLUMBIA 573 545 518 492 471 459 WEST LAKE HILLS 1,605 1,833 2,049 2,178 2,320 2.471 WEST ORANGE 530 516 502 -188 479 479 WEST TAWAKONI 311 342 354 389 420 451 WEST UNIVERSITY PL. 3,101 3,275 3,438 3,591 3,780 3,989 WESTON 251 672 1,482 4,234 7,410 12,702 'AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4f7J2011 3:38:31 PM Page 39 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 WESTOVER HILLS 276 274 272 270 268 268 WESTWORTH VILLAGE 350 412 426 442 470 519 WHARTON 1,663 1 ,712 1,735 1,733 1 ,721 1,703 WHEELER 291 291 291 291 291 291 WHITE DEER 164 165 164 159 144 130 WHITE OAK 1,093 1,171 1,248 1,337 1,481 1,700 WHITE SETTLEMENT 2,531 2,647 2.742 2,831 3,031 3,253 WHITEHOUSE 982 1,070 1,153 1,240 1,405 1,636 WHITESBORO 764 851 958 1,070 1,227 1,635 WHITEWRIGHT 403 632 873 1,048 1.230 1,419 WHITNEY 365 370 375 380 391 405 WICHITA FALLS 23,049 22,015 22,810 22,743 22,700 22,874 WILLIS 568 649 816 1,024 1.296 1,626 WILLOW PARK 681 934 1,298 1,557 1,731 1,855 WILLS POINT 592 636 670 695 734 783 WI LMER 443 527 612 874 1,631 2,563 WILSON 67 68 65 63 60 55 WINDCREST 1,204 1,196 1,187 1,177 1,174 1,182 WINK 331 341 341 338 331 320 WINN SBORO 669 743 784 791 785 785 WINONA 107 115 123 131 147 169 WINTERS 552 561 566 571 575 591 WOLFE CITY 206 212 221 235 267 315 WOLFFORTH 1,468 1,758 1,822 1,884 1,962 2,006 'AN ACTT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/712011 3:38:31 PM Page 40 of 41 CITY NAME 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 2060 WOODBRANCH 183 202 225 249 284 330 WOODCREEK 246 315 385 452 540 610 WOODS6ORO 283 291 289 292 295 293 WOODViLLE 661 750 802 818 814 814 WOODWAY 2,944 2,925 2, 94 3 2,882 2,867 2.874 WORTHAM 272 321 369 414 453 495 WYLIE 6,810 8.737 10,586 12,601 12,661 12,601 YOAKUM 918 907 878 835 787 748 YORKTOWN 343 344 340 334 323 318 ZAPATA 1.033 1,017 1.001 985 974 974 ZAVALLA 86 84 82 80 78 78 TEXAS TOTAL 3,878,669 4,437,131 4,945,551 5,441,589 5,962,457 6,535,160 `AN ACFT IS THE AMOUNT OF WATER TO COVER ONE ACRE WITH ONE FOOT OF WATER AND IS EQUAL TO 325,851 GALLONS 4/7/2011 3:38:31 PM Page 41 of 41 APPENDI B I yy u� t Ii I � � T pl Current r «J.m.,�. eDV14kjN Y- "RWC!•OiPpMTUMV Zoning ,, • , ,,""„".`"".. �r. OUA.DALt1PE pixtlki �PA:EIPA i � �PF7DI PSI Dr�}a TUN, hl:4C'L? •� (R,+iI � lFV�1Fri - .� � Y1F,2� §Made fartV� D,.s► (W9} /wo s�rdr Dr�M,p _ (�•iJ M1pNnrif $Au&F.snANfT.wlF -p �� � 6ea1 S+r�fsnif �b �\ Va-rl g,¢. Faafr -.We q '1 • �.ry cads :lu: -a tZ+v i.w taw mw kL.- -. d n�- _. db p]i270—r � . Im (Wit M.r-� is Agt1D Current r «J.m.,�. eDV14kjN Y- "RWC!•OiPpMTUMV Zoning ,, • , ,,""„".`"".. �r. OUA.DALt1PE Ll o [THE CTrY OF MAY IZ 2008 SEWER SERVICE AREAS 0: r Schertz Municipal Boundary Schertz ETJ Boundary A GITY,0 LIVE OAK ti SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY NFU I �I ` . 4� { *. 7�4 A GITY,0 LIVE OAK ti SAN ANTONIO RIVER AUTHORITY NFU I �I 1-4 !I rTl Lr) co 1-4 !I | � ! � / | / t §7 <5 / | ■ U ' � ! . , / \ k- 3- # , _ ., ea R^ , � ...... .. ......... .. .................. .... : � :.. ... .... ... ::::.: ...................................................................... . ... ........,:.: &. .::::::fI!::. ........................... ............... ............................... ............................... :::: :::::::......................................... . ... ............ . ...... ... .. ....... .. .... .:.:::... .......:::..................... ......................... ...... .. ......:.....:... ' ':::: .....::: :: F.. :. ... ` .::.....::.g .................. . :.. i : ::. ....... .. ...... ::::.: ..................................................... .. ...... .. . .................................. ...... ................................... . ....... ................... .. :: :. ..' t- .... .. ......... ::::: ............................. .... ................................... . .::::....: .......: ......................... ....... . .............. .. :.::: ::.:::::::::::::..............: ....: :::.... ............................... ... ... ... .. .. ... .. '::'...... :.:::::.::::................................... ............................... .... ....... ...... .. .... .. .. .yy:' .... R:.'::. . ........... ..... ....... .... ... .': :$ .. ... ..... ................................................. .......... ............................... .. .. ..... ......... ..... :::::::.:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::..:::::::: ::::::::::::::::: : : : :::.......; .....; .......... ......; ..... . ....'z4;::'. :.:.:::.........::::.......................... ............................... .... ...... ...... ....... :.:::::.::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::........ ......................:: :................:::..........: ......... ................................................... ............................... ....................... .. ..... . ... . ........ ...... .... .... .... .:.' .:.: x .:........................................ ............................... .................. .............. .............. '.. 1. 1. y . ':�:' .':.':.'.'......'.'':.: '�:: ................ #'. .1 ..... .. .... K: .: :::: .. .... 1' :.::.':.'..'..' :.':.':.'::::::: :::::::.::::::::::::::: :::::: :::::::::::::::::::::::::.....: .....: ... ...... ... ....... .:.:::.: ........................... ............................... .....................;; ...... .:.:::.: .................... ............................... ............... ....... ............. .. ..: , .'::p ::':.'::::':.::::.:.':.':.'::' :':X;: ': ':::::':::::::::::': :::::::::::::::::::::: ::::: ::::::::::::::::::::::::.....:: ...............:. .. .... ........................... ............................... ......... ..............::: ':....... -:: :::::::.::::::::::::::: ::::::::::: .::::::::::::....: ...:: ....................... ....... ........ ...... .:.:::...................... ............................... ... . ' :: ::::...................... ............................... .... .... ........ .... ...... ............ ':. ::.r:':::...:.. .. ..:.; ......... . ...::.;:::.: ..........:': ......... . ....... ............; .:.:::................... ............................... .. ... :::::::::::::: .::::::: :::::::::::: ::..........::::............... . ......... ..... ... .:::::.................... ............................... .. :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::.... .....:::::..................... .:::::........................ ............................... .... ... ..... .. .. :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::...::::::::.......: ................. ....... ... ......... .. .:::::.: ............... ............................... . :::::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::: ..:::: .:::::::...................... ........ ............ .. ...;; . ' ; . . ... .. ..:.:.PA: ::...:. . .. .. .:::::............... ............................... .. ::::::::.:.::::::.:::: ::::....::: :::::::..::::.................. .... ... ... ........... .. ... ....:.� .............................. . ...................... : : : : : : : :: ...�:. . ........................... ............... ............................... I i E: . .................. . ... ... ......... ::.. . . .... 1 e �8 2 0 L 7 t�l EM C a� LJ CIS n tl t1 a k w � Ft CrJ I fy H U) m