final_jbsa_randolph_appendices_july_2015_smThe following Appendices are provided as supplemental materials to support this JLUS
process, the recommendations, and the final JLUSproducts. The appendices that are
included for the ]BSA-Rando|ph AFB JLUSare:
Appendix A— Fact 6heets_.................................................... A-1
m This appendix provides the fact sheets that were distributed to the committees and
public in effort to educate the public about the ]LU5process.
III
11i; siriiilzi
m This appendix provides a copy of the Z011 DOD Instruction for A|CUZ Programs for
h(C— PuNic Comments.... ....................................................C-1
m This appendix provides a compilation of all the public comments received on the JILUS
process, report, and recommendations throughout this J LUS process.
ixD — Advisory Committee Meetings ... . .......... ... ~. ...... ....—...~........ .D-1
m This appendix provides a compilation of the advisory committee meeting agendas and
sign-in sheets for reference.
AppendixE — ExecotiveCVrnmittee E-1
m This appendix provides a compilation of the executive committee meeting agendas
and sign-in sheets for reference.
Appendix F— Client Comments . ..... . ... ...... ............ .. ............ .—....... ............ ......... F1
m This appendix provides a compilation of all the client comments for each document
submitted for review.
Appendix A-0
Appendix A
jBSA-Randolph AFB Fact.
Sheets
Appendix A Fact Sheets A -1
and Objectives?
A Joint Land Use Study (J LUS) is a
cooperative planning effort conducted
as a joint venture between an active
military installation, surrounding cities
and other affected stakeholders. The
JBSA-Randolph JLUS is funded through
(DOD), Office of Economic Adjustment
(OEA) and contributions by the JLUS
project manager, Bexar County.
The JLUS effort can benefit both JBSA-
°
Protecting the health and safety of
proximate residents and workers;
Preserving long-term land use
compatibility between JBSA-
Randolph and the surrounding
°
Promoting comprehensive
community planning that addresses
compatibility issues;
Enhancing a cooperative spirii
between JBSA-Randolph and
community officials; and
Integrating surrounding local
jurisdiction growth policy plans with
the installation's plans.
develop airmen of today and tomorrow
through various education disciplines
and training activities.
]BSA-Rando|ph supports local
communities through direct and
indirect employment, operations and
maintenance contracts, and asanactive
member of the local communities. JBS&-
Rando|phsupportsandservesover
17'000 personnel providing regional
economic impact of$zz4million.
Who Will Guide the JLUS
Interagency
Coordination
Cornraunication
Interagency coordination na!auestnthc
level of interaction on compatibility issues
among military installations, jurisdictions,
land and resource management agencies, and
conservation authorities.
2 2 Use
Thcbasbnf|andusep|annin8ndaues
to the government's role in protecting the
public's health, safety, and welfare. County
and local jurisdictions' growth policy/ general
plans and zoning ordinances can be the most
effective tools for avoiding, orresolving,
land use compatibility issues. These tnn|`
ensure the separation of land uses that
differ significantly incharacter. Land use
separation also applies tn properties where
the use of one property may impact the use
of another. For instance, industrial uses are
often separated from residential uses toavoid
impacts n,|AeP94ise, odors, lighting, etc.
4 Verticc-il Obstructions
Vertical obstructions are created by
buildings, trees structures, or other features
that may encroach into the navigable
airspace used for military operations (aircraft
approach, transitional, inner horizontal,
outer horizontal, and conical areas, aswell
as military training
routes). These can
present asafety
hazard to both the
public and military
personnel and
potentially impact
military readiness.
This factor covers the extension orprovision
nf infrastructure (mads, sewer, water, etc)in
the vicinity of the installation. Infrastructure
can enhance the operations of the installation
by providing needed services, such assanitary
sewer treatment capacity and transportation
systems. However, enhanced orexpanded
infrastructure could also encourage growth
into areas near h n that might not
be compatible with current or future missions.
Antijanoricm/pnrooProt—f-iun (AT /PP�
relates to the safety of personnel, facilities,
and information onan installation from
outside threats. Methods ,u protect the
installation and its supportive facilities can
impact off-installation uses.
19. Energy Development
14Frequency Spectrum
1mpedance/
Interference
Public Trespassing
tur sources
17 Legislative Initiatives
Water quality / quantity concerns include
the assurance that adequate water supplies
of good quality are available for use bythe
installation and surrounding communities
as the area develops. Water supply for
agricultural and industrial use isalso
considered.
0 ON
Sensitive biological resources include
federally-listed threatened and endangered
species and the habitats they exist in or
utilize. These resources may also include
areas such as wetlands and migratory
corridors that are critical to the overall
ecosystem. The presence ufsensitive
biological resources may require special
development considerations and should be
included early in the planning process.
7 Marine
Environments
Regulatory or permit requirements
protecting marine and ocean resource can
cumulatively affect the military's ability to
conduct operations, training exercises, or
testing ina water-based environment.
Fact Sheets
NA I'm RAO W -M
Pressure »o gain access to valuable natural
resources (such as oil, natural gas, and
minerals) located on military installations,
within military training areas, oronpublic
lands historically used for military operations
can impact land utilization and military
operations.
22Spaces
The military manages or uses land, air, and
sea space to accomplish testing, training,
and operational missions. These resources
must be available and ofasufficient size'
cohesiveness, and quality tnaccommodate
effective training and testing. Competition
for these shared resources can impact future
growth in operations for all users.
24Roadway Capacity
Roadway capacity relates to
'he ability ofexisting freeways, highways,
arteda|4 and other local roads toprovide
adequate mobility and access between
nUitary installations and their surrounding
IMIMW
]HSA-Randophis located innortheastern
Bexur County, Texas and bsituated
outside the San Antonio city limits and
is completely surrounded byseveral
small municipalities: the City ofUniversal
City to the north; the City of5chertzto
the northeast, east and south; and the
City of Converse to the west. This area
is almost completely urbanized except
for undeveloped areas in Converse and
Schertz.
]8SA-Seguhn Auxiliary Airfield isa sub-
installation of]BSA'Randn|phandis
located one mile east-southeast of the City
of Seguin along U.S. Route go(US-go).
The City of Seguin is characterized asa
rural and agriculture-friendly municipality
located 3o miles east ofJ85A-Rando|ph
along the Interstate-lo and US-go corridor
Stinson Municipal Airport is owned and
operated by the City of San Antonio. |t
is situated in San Antonio City Council
District 3' just south of downtown and is
open to public use. |tis approximately 3]
miles south-southwest ufJ8SA-Rando|ph
proper and is contracted by the DOD
to enable flying training exercises. The
area around Stinson Municipal Airport is
The ]BSA-Rando|phJLUS Study Area
was designed to encompass all lands
and operational areas of]BSA-Rando|ph
locations and use areas that may impact
current or future military operations or
be impacted by these operations. The
proposed Study Area (shown on the map
below) is the initial area ofinvestigation
for the collection nf data. The final Study
Area will be refined based oninformation
collected and input from the public and
the JLUS Committees.
For Additional County nfBexar IJ3N. Pecos La Trinidad, Suite q2O
Information Public Works Department San Antonio, TX70207
Contact: /bsa'rj|us@benar.org P(21O)535'U7I6
R(21O)]55'6713
Matri �
Rev. 2013 10 08a
The strategy types presented within
this fact sheet constitute a"too|box"
of possible actions that can betaken
tn address the range ofcompatibility
issues identified during the ]LUSprocess.
This document is intended to start the
discussion to develop specific strategies
�
Acquisition
* Code Enforcement
* Communication and Coordination
* Comprehensive / Master Plans
that are useful in the study area. For
each strategy type, a brief overview is
provided to assist incommunicating a
general understanding of its intent. It
will beupto each individual stakeholder
to determine the best assortment of
tools / strategies that are appropriate
for their jurisdictions oragencies.
|tis important to note that once the
JLUS process is completed, the final
document is not an adopted plan, but
rather a recommended set ofstrategies
which JLUS stakeholders have agreed
should be implemented tuenhance
Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ)
N Partnership with Non-Governmentli
Organizations
* Real Estate Disclosures
* Zoning Ordinancel Subdivision Regulations
pua land use planning tool, property rights
can be acquired through donation, easement,
or the outright purchase of property for
public purposes. The purpose ufacquisition
tools isto eliminate land use incompatibilities
through market transactions and the local
development process. Acquisition tools are
particularly effective because they advance
the complementary goals of shifting future
growth away from military installations
and preserving community assets such as
agriculture, open space, rural character, or
sensitive natural habitats.
Air Installation
The Air Installation Compatible Use Zone
(wCUz) program isan Air Force planning
program developed in response to
incompatible urban development and land
use conflicts around military airfields. The
m{Uz program seeks to provide information
on compatibility, develop acooperative
relationship between communities and military
bases, and provide land use compatibility
guidelines that protect public health and safety
while maintaining military readiness.
xo Airport Master Plan provides the
guidelines for future long-term airport
development which will satisfy aviation
demand ina financially feasible manner,
while at the same time resolving the aviation,
environmental, and socioeconomic issues
existing ina community. The Airport Master
Plan process is guided by the FAA and
ultimately results in projections offuture
growth and anAirport Layout Plan (ALp).
All development at federally obligated
airports must bein accordance with and FAA-
approved ALP.
For compatibility planning, airspace planning
provides a coordinated apprnadh«,the
designation pfi%,981�ipl use airspace.
Avigation Easement
^n easement isa non-possessory right touse
land owned by another party. xnavigation
easement isan easement that grants the
holder one nr more of the following rights:
the right of flight; the right ^o cause noise,
dust, or other impacts related toaircraft
flight; the right tn restrict orprohibit
certain lights, electromagnetic signals,
and bird-attracting land uses; the right tn
unobstructed airspace over the property
above a specified height; and, the right of
ingress nr egress upon the land toexercise
those rights.
Similar uza local ju,isdiction,mi|hary
installations maintain a|nng-ran8ep|an,
such as general plans and master plans. The
installation's general/master plan bthe
primary document that is used to guide the
development and use nf physical assets and
the protection ofresources. The general /
master plan is used tv ensure aninstallation
maintains the land use areas and infrastructure
needed to respond tn its development
program and future mission potential.
Fact Sheets
Bird /Wildlife
Strike Hazard
The Bird /Wildlife Aircraft Strike Hazard
(BASV) program is aimed at reducing the
potential for collisions between military
aircraft and birds and other wildlife.
Knowledge of where birds travel, nest, and
feed helps the military avoid problem areas,
and therefore saves lives and avoids the
destruction cd valuable aircraft. The program
also looks to work with local stakeholders
to avoid actions that would increase BASH
incidents. The BASH program considers not
only birds / wildlife within the confines ofthe
airfield, but also in neighboring areas.
Building Codes /
Construction Standards
Building codes and construction standards
are ordinances and regulations controlling
the design, construction processes, materials,
alteration, and occupancy of any structure
to safeguard human safety and welfare.
They include both technical and functional
standards and generally address structural
safety, fire safety, health requirements,
and accessibility. Noise attenuation
requirements, for example, are typically
covered under this category.
Program
a Capital Improvement Program (op)ba
detailed planning document used to plan and
direct a jurisdiction's nr agency's investment
|n public facilities, including infrastructure.
The c|P lays out the public facilities plans
and programs ofd`cjurisdicdunn,agcncy
and provides details nn expenditures that
can bc incorporated into the jurisdiction's or
agency's annual budgeting process. Most
c|ps cover multiple years in order tn plan for
major expenditures and projects.
»VA
The purpose ofa code enforcement program
isto promote and maintain a safe and
desirable living and working environment.
Related to land use compatibility, code
enforcement iso tool used bya community tn
ensure adherence to its rules and regulations.
Communication and
Coordination
|n any planning effort, plans can only
move toward successful implementation
if frequent ongoing communication is
maintained among local jurisdictions, the
military, state and federal agencies, Native
American tribal groups, landowners, and
the public. Enhanced communication and
coordination isan integral component to
successful compatibility planning |nsupport
of the military's existing and potential
fvturemission(s).
These are long-range p|anstha outline
goals and policies tn guide the physical
development ina county n,city.
Comprehensive plans are designed tnserve
as the jurisdiction's blueprint for future
decisions concerning physical development,
including land use, infrastructure, public
services, and resource conservation. Most
comprehensive plans consist of written text
discussing the community's goals, objectives,
policies, and programs for the distribution
nf land use as well as one or more diagrams
illustrating the general location ufexisting
and future land uses, roadways, public
facilities and parks and open space.
Covenants
Deed restrictions, or covenants, are written
agreements that restrict or limit some ufthe
rights associated with property ownership.
These restrictions are recorded with the
deed for the property and are attached to
the property when itis sold toa new owner
(ie, they remain ineffect). Deed restrictions
are private agreements n,contra'ts
executed between a motivated buyer and a
willing seller.
property, fall into three categories: (1) those
that keep the hazard away from people,
property, and structures; (z) those that keep
people, property, and structures away from
the hazard; and (3) those that reduce the
impact of the hazard.
The primary objective of habitat conservation
tools b the conservation and protection of
sensitive natural habitats and the species
that occupy them. An example of this is
the federal Endangered Species Act (ESA)
which allows for the development o/Habitat
Conservation Plans (HCPs).AnHCPidentifies
and provides for the regional orarea-wide
protection of plants, animals, and their
habitats, while allowing compatible and
appropriate economic activity. The primary
objective of the *{P program istoconserve
natural communities at the ecosystem |eve|
while accommodating compatible land use.
Hazard mitigation is defined as any sustained,
cost effective action taken to reduce or
eliminate long-term risk to people, property,
and the environment from natural and
man-made hazards and their effects. Hazard
Mitigation Plans include actions that have
a positive impact over an extended period
of time. This distinguishes them from
emergency planning or emergency services,
which are associated with preparedness
for immediate response to, and short-term
recovery from, a specific event. Hazard
mitigation actions, which can be used to
eliminate or minimize the risk to life and
Appendix A Fact Sheets I
Legislative Tools
State and local legislation can have a
significant impact on compatibility planning
by allowing, restricting, or limiting the tools
available tu local jurisdictions to control land
use planning activities. Legislative Tools
are designed to encourage changes instate
and local laws and ordinances tusupport
the objectives of the recommended JLUS
strategies.
Memorandum
x Memorandum of Understanding (wOU)b
a contract between two n, more government
entities. The governing bodies ofthe
participating public agencies must take
appropriate legal actions, often adoption
ofan ordinance ur resolution, before such
agreements become effective. The purpose
of an MOU is to establish a formal framework
for coordination andoonpe,ation.These
agreements may also assign roles and
responsibilities for all nf the agreement's
signatories. These agreements are also
known as Joint Powers Agreements or
mtedoca|Agreements.
Military Influence Areas
Policy Act
The National Environmental Policy Ac
(w EPA) b the federal law that established
a national policy for the environment and
requires federal agencies: (1)tnbecome
aware of the environmental ramifications of
their proposed actions, (z)to fully disclose
to the public proposed federal actions and
provide a mechanism for public input to
federal decision making, and (3)tnprepare
environmental impact statements for every
major action that would significantly affect
the quality of the human environment.
Partnership with
Organizations
Non-Governmental 0rganizadons(mCOs
are recognized for their role indeveloping
innovative initiatives and programs
to address a variety ofissues. Local
governments and military installations
can develop relationships with wCOsto
provide additional resources toachieve
)oint goals. For example, under these
partnerships, agreements can be reached tu
acquire real estate or property rights in the
vicinity of military installations tnprotect
military training, testing, operations, and
readiness, while at the same time, achieving
the objectives of the wCO` such ashabitat
protection.
Real Estate Disclosures
Prior tothe transfer of real property ma
new owner, real estate disclosure requires
sellers and their agents to disclose certain
specified facts related to the condition of
the property. These facts could include
noise or other proximity impacts associated
with property near a military installation nr
operations area. The purpose nf real estate
disclosure isto protect the seller, buyer, and
sales agent from potential litigation resulting
from specified existing and /oranticipated
conditions
(i.r,hazard
areas, existing
easements).
Disclosures provide
a practical and
cost effective land
use compatibility
tool as buyers are
informed of the
possible affects (no� light, etc.) of military
operations prior to purchase.
Zoning Ordinance /
Zoning b the division ofa jurisdiction into
districts (zone) within which permissible
uses are prescribed and restrictions on
building height, bulk, layout, and other
requirements are defined. The primary
purpose of zoning isto protect the public
health, safety, and welfare of the community
by separating incompatible land uses and
establishing design requirements. Effective
zoning can also provide opportunities
for the implementation ofregulations
supporting land use compatibility near
military installations. For instance, zoning
can address:
For Additional VA County ofBexar
Qel
Information Public Works Department
Contact: /bsa'rj|us@bexacorg
233 N. Pecos La Trinidad, Suite 420
San Antonio, TX78207
p(oU)535-O7z6
R(21O)]55'6n3
° Nuisances such asnoise, vibration and air
emissions,
• Land use type and intensity (including
clustering),
~ Light and glare,
° Frequency spectrum and impedance,
° Height/ vertica obstructions,
° Development incentives, and
° Development processes and procedures.
Land cannot be divided without local
government approval. Subdivisions set
forth the minimum requirements deemed
necessary tn protect the health, safety, and
welfare nf the public. Subdivision review
allows local governments the opportunity
tn ensure that a new subdivision |s
properly served by needed services and a
public or private agency is responsible for
maintaining the subdivision improvements.
These regulations can be effectively used
for compatibility planning. For example,
subdivision regulations might limit the
division of land in areas with compatibility
issues o, locations without necessary
services. Subdivision regulations can also be
used to require open-space sctasidcs.
Matrix
��
Rev. 2014 02 06
wml�
2011 DOD Instruction
4165m57 - Program for
Air Installation Compatible
Use Zones
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -1
Department of Defense
INSTRUCTION
NUMBER 4165.57
May 2, 2011
USD(AT &L)
SUBJECT: Air Installations Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ)
References: See Enclosure 1
1. PURPOSE. This Instruction:
a. Reissues DOD Instruction (DoDI) 4165.57 (Reference (a)) in accordance with the
authority in DOD Directive (DODD) 5134.01 (Reference (b)) to establish policy, assign
responsibilities, and prescribe procedures for the DOD AICUZ program for air installations, in
accordance with DoDD 4165.06 (Reference (c)).
b. Establishes policy and assigns responsibility for educating air installation personnel and
engaging local communities on issues related to noise, safety, and compatible land use in and
around air installations.
c. Prescribes procedures for plotting noise contours for land use compatibility analysis.
2. APPLICABILITY. This Instruction applies to:
a. The Office of the Secretary of Defense, the Military Departments, the Office of the
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Joint Staff, the Combatant Commands, the Office
of the Inspector General of the DOD, the Defense Agencies, the DOD Field Activities, and all
other organizational entities within the DOD (hereafter referred to collectively as the "DOD
Components ").
b. Air installations of the DOD Components located within the United States.
c. Air installations of the DOD Components located outside of the United States, but for on-
base planning purposes only and subject to the requirements of any applicable international
agreement, including any basing agreement.
3. DEFINITIONS. See Glossary.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -2
4. POLICY. It is DOD policy to:
a. Promote the health, safety, and welfare of persons in the vicinity of and on air installations
by minimizing aircraft noise and safety impacts without degrading flight safety and mission
requirements.
b. Promote long -term compatible land use on and in the vicinity of air installations by
encouraging State and local governments to adopt enabling legislation and compatible land use
regulations into their land use planning and control processes and by partnering with
communities and other eligible entities to protect land through restrictive use and conservation
easements.
c. Limit acquisition of real property interests to the minimum necessary to ensure the
operational integrity of the air installation.
d. Incorporate AICUZ guidelines into on -base land use planning programs.
e. Integrate AICUZ compatible land use strategies into the test and training range
environment in accordance with DODD 3200.15 (Reference (d)).
f. Promote education and engagement with communities affected by military operations at
air installations. DODD 5410.18 (Reference (e)) provides policy for the conduct of public affairs
community relations activities and programs throughout the DOD.
5. RESPONSIBILITIES. See Enclosure 2.
6. PROCEDURES. See Enclosure 3.
7. RELEASABILITY. UNLIMITED. This Instruction is approved for public release and is
available on the Internet from the DOD Issuances Website at http: / /www.dtic.mil /whs /directives.
8. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Instruction is effective upon its publication to the DOD Issuances
Website.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -3
DoDI4165.57, May 2, 2011
Enclosures
1. References
2. Responsibilities
3. Procedures
Glossary
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -4
ENCLOSURE 2: RESPONSIBILITIES .........................................................................................6
DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY (}F DEFENSE FOR INSTALLATIONS AND
ENVIRONMENT (D[}SD(I&E)) ........................................................................................ h
GENERAL................................................................................................................................. 7
AlCLCZ STUDY CONTENT ..................................................................................................... 0
AIRCRAFT ACCIDENT POTENTIAL ----------------------------9
/\PZS AND CLEAR ZONES FOR FIXED-WING AIRCRAFT .............................................. g
APZS AND CLEAR ZONES FOR AIRCRAFT-------------l0
AIRCRAFTNOISE ................................................................................................................. 0
A8CliZUPDATES .................................................................................................................. 1l
ACQUISITION OF INTERESTS IN LANDS ........................................................................ ]l
APPENDIXES
LAPZ GUIDELINES ----------------------------------l5
2. RECOMMENDED LAND USE COMPATIBILITY lNAPZS .................................. 6
3. RECOMMENDED LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN NOISE ZONES ................... 23
PART 1. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ---------------------. 20
PART 11. DEFINITIONS ----------------------------------..2g
l. Land Use Compatibility inAPZs ........................................................................................ l6
2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones ............................................................................. 23
FIGURE
Runway AyZm and Clear Zones ............................................................................................... l5
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B-5
ENCLOSURE I
REFERENCES
(a) DOD Instruction 4165.57, "Air Installations Compatible Use Zones," November 8, 1977
(hereby cancelled)
(b) DOD Directive 5134.01, "Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and
Logistics (USD(AT &L))," December 9, 2005
(c) DOD Directive 4165.06, "Real Property," October 13, 2004
(d) DOD Directive 3200.1.5, "Sustainment of Ranges and Operating Areas (OPAREAs),"
January 10, 2003
(e) DOD Directive 5410.18, "Public Affairs Community Relations Policy," November 20, 2001.
(f) DOD Instruction 4165.70, "Real Property Management," April 6, 2005
(g) DOD Instruction 4165.71, "Real Property Acquisition," January 6, 2005
(h) DOD Instruction 4165.72, "Real Property Disposal," December 21, 2007
(i) Unified Facilities Criteria 3- 260 -01, "Airfield and Heliport Planning and Design,"
November 17, 2008
(j} Part 77 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
(k) Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise, "Guidelines for Considering Noise In
Land Use Planning and Control," June 1980
(1) Federal Interagency Committee on Noise, "Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport
Noise Analysis Issues," August 1992
(m) Federal Highway Administration, "Standard Land Use Coding Manual," January 1965
(n) DOD Instruction 4715.13, "DOD Noise Program," November 1.5, 2005
(o) Department of Defense Noise Working Group, "Improving Aviation Noise Planning,
Analysis, and Public Communication with Supplemental Metrics," December 2009
(p) Sections 2391(b)(1), 2684a of title 10, United States Code
(q) DOD Directive 3030.01, "Office of Economic Adjustment," March 5, 2006
(r) DOD Instruction 3030.3, "Joint Land Use Study (JLUS) Program," July 13, 2004
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -6
ENCLOSURE 2
1. DEPUTY UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE FOR INSTALLATIONS AND
ENVIRONMENT (DUSD(I &E )). The DUSD(I &E), under the authority, direction, and control
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, shall:
a. Provide general oversight over the AICUZ program.
b. Provide additional guidance as necessary.
2. HEADS OF THE DOD COMPONENTS. The Heads of the DOD Components shall:
a. Develop, implement, and maintain an AICUZ program for each air installation.
b. Ensure that each air installation conducts and maintains an AICUZ study.
c. Develop AICUZ for DoD- controlled joint military - civilian use airfields.
d. Provide education and training for air installation leadership on aircraft noise and safety,
land use compatibility, and community engagement.
e. Acquire, manage, and dispose of real property interests associated with the AICUZ
program consistent with DoDIs 4165.70, 4165.71, and 4165.72 (References (f), (g), and (h)).
f. Review and approve AICUZ studies and updates for each air installation.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -7
ENCLOSURE 3
Ionia��1�� :��y
L GENERAL
a. The DOD Components shall ensure that their air installations engage State and local
governments and communities to foster compatible land use and to help local governments and
communities better understand the nature of aircraft operations and procedures in and around the
air installation. DOD Components shall ensure participation in local comprehensive planning
processes, engage the community, and seek effective land use controls such as, but not limited
to, AICUZ overlay zoning ordinances, planned unit developments, subdivision regulations, and
height regulations. Other strategies to achieve compatibility include use of building codes,
transfer development rights, real property acquisition, buffer lands and restrictive easement
acquisition, and disclosure ordinances.
b. Regional and local governments may not always have the authority to enact land use
controls to achieve compatibility. In circumstances where incompatible development threatens
the mission, acquisition of real property interests may be required to ensure compatibility.
c. The DOD Components shall ensure that their air installations establish effective working
relationships with State, tribal, and local governments, including local planning commissions,
special purpose districts, regional and State agencies, airport land -use commissions, and other
Federal agencies to communicate the objectives of the AICUZ program and operational
requirements. This Instruction does not impose any requirements on members of the public or
State or local governments, nor does it prescribe any specific course of action for these groups to
take in dealing with the DOD on land -use questions.
d. The DOD Components shall ensure that each of their air installations:
(1) Address land use compatibility on and in the vicinity of the air installation where:
(a) Aircraft operations may affect the public health, safety, or welfare.
(b) Certain uses or structures may obstruct the airspace, attract birds, create
electromagnetic or thermal interference, or produce dust, smoke, steam, or light emissions that
may impact a pilot's vision, or otherwise be hazardous to or incompatible with aircraft
operations.
(2) Apply these compatible land use guidelines:
(a) Limit concentrations of people and facilities in areas exposed to a higher risk
from aircraft accidents.
(b) Promote compatibility with the noise exposure from air installation operations.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -8
(c) Promote restrictions on land uses and heights of natural objects and man -made
objects in the vicinity of air installations that may obstruct the airspace, attract birds, cause
electromagnetic or thermal interference, or produce dust, steam, smoke, or light emissions to
provide for safety of flight and the public welfare.
e. The DOD Components shall ensure that their air installations use the land area and height
standards defined in the Unified Facilities Criteria 3- 260 -01 (Reference (i)) for purposes of
identifying airspace obstructions and potential land use compatibility issues in accordance with
part 77 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations (Reference (j)).
2. AICUZ STUDY CONTENT
a. An AICUZ study shall include:
(1) A description of the aircraft noise and aircraft accident potential environment around
the air installation for existing operations.
(2) A description of the long -term (5 -10 year) aircraft noise and accident potential
environment for projected aircraft operations that is consistent with the planning horizon used by
State, tribal, regional, and local planning bodies.
(3) Recommendations for achieving compatible land use development considering
aircraft noise, accident potential, bird or wildlife aircraft strike hazard (BASH), electromagnetic
interference, dust, steam, smoke or light emissions, and heights of natural and man -made objects
near the air installation that affect flight safety within the air installation's environs.
(4) Identification of existing and potential incompatible land uses.
b. Land use compatibility determinations concerning aircraft noise shall be derived from the
Federal Interagency Committee on Urban Noise, "Guidelines for Considering Noise In Land Use
Planning and Control" (Reference (k)) and as endorsed by the Federal Interagency Committee on
Noise (FICON) in the "Federal Agency Review of Selected Airport Noise Analysis Issues"
(Reference (1)).
c. The Federal Highway Administration's Standard Land Use Coding Manual (SLUCM)
(Reference (m)) shall be used for a standard descriptor of land uses. The SLUCM standards,
including their codes and sub - codes, provide planners with detailed information describing
specific land use categories. Based on the SLUCM codes, land use compatibility guidelines for
Clear Zones and Accident Potential Zones (APZs) (as defined in Glossary and discussed in
paragraph 3.f. of this enclosure) are shown in Appendix 1 to this enclosure. Suggested land use
compatibility guidelines in aircraft noise zones are shown in Appendix 2. Additions to some
land use categories have been incorporated into Tables 1 and 2 of Appendix 2 subsequent to
issuance of the SLUCM to reflect additional land uses and to clarify the categorization of certain
uses.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -9
d. Areas of critical concern beyond the AICUZ footprint may be established.
a. Areas immediately beyond the ends of runways possess a measurably higher potential for
aircraft accidents. For this reason, development should be restricted to certain types of land uses
and densities.
b. Land use compatibility for APZs is founded on the concept of minimizing density of land
use in the vicinity of air installations. In addition to limiting density, certain types of land uses
such as residential development, educational facilities, and medical facilities are considered
incompatible and are strongly discouraged in APZs. Appendix 2 to this enclosure provides a
detailed land use compatibility matrix for local governments as well as DOD personnel for on-
base planning. Table 1 of Appendix 2 provides land use compatibility recommendations for the
Clear Zones and APZs I and II. To assist local governments in implementing land use controls
in APZs, recommended floor area ratios (FAR) are provided for select commercial uses.
c. DOD fixed -wing runways are separated into two types, Class A and Class B, for the
purpose of defining aircraft accident potential areas.
d. Specific details on runway types can be found in Reference (i).
e. The descriptions of APZ boundaries in Appendix 1 to this enclosure are guidelines only.
Their strict application would increase the safety of the general public but would not provide
complete protection against the effects of aircraft accidents. Where it is desirable to restrict the
density of development of an area, it is not usually possible to state that one density is safe and
another is not. Air installations should work to create the greatest degree of safety that can be
reasonably attained based on local circumstances. Local situations may differ significantly from
the assumptions and data upon which these guidelines are based and may require individual
study.
4. APZS AND CLEAR ZONES FOR FIXED -WING AIRCRAFT
a. A Clear Zone is required at the ends of all active DOD runways.
b. APZs maybe modified:
(1) Where multiple flight tracks exist and significant numbers of aircraft operations are
on multiple flight tracks, modifications may be made to create APZs that conform to the multiple
flight tracks.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -10
(2) Where most aircraft do not overfly the APZs, modifications may be made to alter the
straight APZs shown in Appendix 2 to this enclosure and adjust them to conform to the actual
lines of flight.
(3) Where other unusual conditions exist, modifications may be made to alter APZs as
necessary.
• •' ' • . • Mil VA I R • All
a. The dimension of Clear Zones for rotary -wing runways and helipads for visual and
standard instrument flight rules (IFR) operations is 400 feet long (the width can vary). The Clear
Zone length for Army and Air Force IFR same direction ingress and egress is 825 feet.
b. The dimension of APZs for rotary -wing runways and helipads is 800 feet long.
c. The dimensions for APZs and Clear Zones for rotary -wing runways and helipads are
discussed in greater detail in Reference (i).
a. General
(1) Long -term land use compatibility with noise resulting from the operation of military
aircraft should minimize the effects on people, animals (domestic and wild), and structures on or
in proximity to air installations. Appendix 3 to this enclosure provides a detailed land use
compatibility matrix for DOD Component personnel to use for on -base planning and to engage
with local governments to foster compatible land use development. Table 2 of Appendix 2
provides land use compatibility recommendations based on SLUCM codes and day -night
average sound level (DNL) or community noise equivalent level (CNEL) noise areas on and
around air installations.
(2) The A- weighted day -night average sound level (ADNL) noise descriptor shall be
used to describe the aircraft noise environment around air installations, except in California,
where the CNEL descriptor shall be used to describe the aircraft noise environment. If laws
require some other aircraft noise descriptor, it may be used in addition to, or as a substitute for,
ADNL. Supplemental noise metrics may also be used to augment the ADNL or CNEL analysis
as noted by the FICON in Reference (k). Since land use compatibility guidelines are based on
yearly average noise levels, aircraft noise contours should be developed based on average annual
day (AAD) operations. However, where the DOD Component determines that AAD does not
adequately represent the aircraft noise impacts at a particular air installation, average busy day
(ABD) operations can be used with supporting rationale.
b. Reducing Noise Impacts. Reasonable, economical, and practical measures shall be taken
to reduce and control the generation of aircraft noise from flying and flying- related activities.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -11
Typical measures normally include siting of engine test and run -up facilities in remote areas
when practical, use of sound suppression equipment, and adjustment of aircraft flight paths to
avoid developed areas when such adjustment can be accomplished safely and without significant
impairment of operational effectiveness.
c. Plotting Aircraft Noise Contours
(1) As a minimum, contours for DNL 65, 70, 75, 80, and 85 shall be plotted on maps for
Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps air installations as part of AICUZ studies. The Army shall
apply Operational Noise Management Program DNL designations of 60 -65, 65 -75, and greater
than 75 at its air installations. Contours below 65 DNL are not required but may be provided if
local conditions warrant discussion of lower aircraft noise levels, such as in rural and desert
areas, or where significant noise complaints have been received from areas outside DNL 65
contours.
(2) Utilize guidance and noise assessment and management techniques from the DOD
Noise Program in accordance with DoDI 471.5.13 (Reference (n)) to support the AICUZ
program.
(3) Supplemental noise metrics may be used to augment DNL and CNEL noise analyses
to provide additional information to describe the noise environment in the vicinity of air
installations. A detailed discussion of supplemental metrics and their application can be found in
the DOD Noise Working Group's "Improving Aviation Noise Planning, Analysis, and Public
Communication with Supplemental Metrics" (Reference (o)).
7. AICUZ UPDATES. Land use planning involves long -range strategies to influence present
and future uses of lands. Frequent AICUZ updates and changes in land use recommendations
can undermine the neighboring community's willingness to incorporate DOD Component
recommendations into local comprehensive plans or to enact land use controls. AICUZ study
recommendations should be based on best available, realistic long -range projections of air
installation operations in support of local, State, and regional government land use planning
objectives. Examples of when AICUZ updates should be undertaken include major mission
changes, increases in nighttime flying (flights between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.), basing of
significant numbers of additional or a new type of aircraft, and base realignment affecting flying
operations.
UISITION OF INTERESTS IN LANDS
a. When local development regulations do not provide sufficient protection for aircraft
operations (e.g., preventing incompatible development or airspace obstructions), the DOD
Component shall consider the acquisition of necessary real property interests.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -12
(1) Ownership in fee or of an appropriate restrictive use easement within the Clear Zone
is preferred, unless State and local government development regulations will clearly have long-
term effectiveness or acquisition is not practicable.
(2) The acquisition of restrictive use easements or interests in land outside the Clear
Zone, such as APZs and noise zones, should only be pursued when State and local governments
are unwilling or unable to enact land use controls to achieve land use compatibility in accordance
with AICUZ guidelines and the operational integrity of the air installation is manifestly
threatened. Acquisition of interests in land may also be pursued in such circumstances where
long -term land use controls are considered to be ineffective and the DOD Component determines
all possibilities of achieving compatible use zoning, or similar protection, have been exhausted.
b. Acquisition of real property interests shall follow the policy and procedures in References
(c) and (f). Acquisition of real property interests from willing sellers pursuant to agreements
with non - Federal governmental agencies and non - governmental organizations, authorized by
section 2684a of title 10, United States Code (Reference (p)), can be an effective means of
preserving compatible land uses.
c. For real property acquisitions, in accordance with paragraph 4.c. above the signature of
this Instruction, these types of rights should be considered, as appropriate:
with:
(1) To make low and frequent flights over the land and to generate noises associated
(a) Aircraft in flight, whether or not while directly over the land.
(b) Aircraft and aircraft engines operating on the ground at the installation.
(c) Aircraft engine test stand, test cell, and hush -house operations at the installation.
(2) To prohibit or limit the release into the air of any substance that would impair the
visibility or otherwise interfere with the operations of aircraft, such as, but not limited to, steam,
dust, and smoke.
(3) To prohibit or limit light emissions, either direct or indirect (reflective), visible or
invisible, including lasers, that might interfere with pilot vision or performance of instruments,
equipment and weapons systems.
(4) To prohibit electromagnetic emissions that would interfere with aircrew, aircraft,
aircraft sensors, aircraft communications systems, or aircraft navigational equipment.
(5) To prohibit any use of the land that would unnecessarily attract birds, such as, but not
limited to, operation of sanitary landfills, maintenance of feeding stations, or growing of certain
types of vegetation attractive to birds.
(6) To prohibit and remove any buildings or other non - frangible structures.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -13
(7) To top, cut to ground level, and to remove trees, shrubs, brush, or other forms of
obstructions that the DOD Component determines might interfere with the operation of aircraft,
including emergency landings.
(8) To ingress and egress upon, over, and across the land for the purpose of exercising
the rights acquired or retained.
(9) To post signs on the land indicating the nature and extent of the Government's
control over it.
(10) To prohibit land uses other than:
(a) Agriculture (except such uses that would attract birds or waterfowl).
(b) Livestock grazing (except managed intensive grazing, concentrated animal
feeding operations, feedlots, dairy herds, and intensive animal husbandry).
(c) Permanent open space (open space recreational use shall conform to the
compatibility guidelines in Appendix 2 of this enclosure).
(d) Existing water areas.
(e) Rights -of -way for fenced highways, without sidewalks or bicycle trails.
(f) Rights -of -way for railroads without terminals or platforms so long as rail traffic
does not extend into the flight path.
(g) Communications and utility rights -of -way, provided all facilities are at or below
grade.
(11) To prohibit entry of persons onto the land except in connection with activities
otherwise authorized.
flight.
(12) To control the height of structures to ensure that they do not become a hazard to
(13) To install airfield lighting and navigational aids.
d. When disposal of non -DoD Federal property at or in the vicinity of an air installation will
impact its mission, the Military Department exercising real property accountability for the air
installation will seek to have the disposal agency retain compatible land use easements over the
property to be disposed of for the benefit of the air installation.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -14
DoDI4165.57, May 2, 2011
M6
a. The Office of Economic Adjustment (OEA) administers the JLUS Program pursuant to
section 2391(b)(1) of Reference (p) and in accordance with DODD 3030.01 (Reference (c)) and
DOM 3030.3 (Reference (r)) to promote consistent ongoing compatible use and outreach
programs between installations and local communities.
b. Each time an AICUZ is updated, the DOD Components shall consider whether further
engagement with the neighboring local communities is needed through a JLUS to preserve the
operational utility of the air installation.
14 ENCLOSURE 3
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -15
Fagg NO 01 KIM 0 ILU BIRIN • '
Fdyi[•i0117 wi`►t1DLy
Guidelines for runway APZs and Clear Zones are depicted in the Figure.
Figure. Runway APZs and Clear Zones
t
uillfi
NOTES:
"- on Navy C! r, one Shape
AP'Z I
I L
t
1. Class B runway Clear Zones are rectangular in shape, with the width of 1000 feet for Department of Army airfields
and 3000 feet for Department of Air Force airfields. Class B runway Clear Zones for Department of Navy airfields
are trapezoidal in shape following the established approach and departure surface and width of the primary surface for
existing runways and new runway construction.
2. Depictions of APZs in the figure are a nominal representation. Flight tracks may depart the runway centerline
before the end of the Clear Zone. APZs for Class A or Class B runways can follow major flight paths including
curved flight paths based on Military Service analysis.
3. The APZ I and APZ II width for a Class B runway at Department of Air Force and Department of Navy airfields is
3000 feet and is 1000 feet for a Class B runway at Department of Army airfields.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -16
Inaps7JimIyellaDa Wo`► 11o1 •Ly Kam owl IIn Inv
1►•�1► /_�yi�
Suggested land use compatibility guidelines in the Clear Zone and APZs are shown in Table 1.
Additions to some land use categories have been incorporated into Table 1 subsequent to
issuance of the SLUCM to reflect additional land uses and to clarify the categorization of certain
uses. The compatible land use recommendations for the Clear Zone and APZs are provided for
local governments as well as DOD personnel for on -base planning.
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in APZs
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
CLEAR ZONE
APZ-1
APZ -II
DENSITY
NO.
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
to
Residential
11
Household Units
11.11
Single units: detached
N
N
Y 2
Maximum density
of 2 Du/Ac
11.12
Single units: semi - detached
N
N
N
11.13
Single units: attached row
N
N
N
11.21
Two units: side -by -side
N
N
N
11.22
Two units: one above the
N
N
N
other
11.31
Apartments: walk -up
N
N
N
11.32
Apartment: elevator
N
N
N
12
1 Group quarters
N
N
N
13
Residential hotels
N
N
N
14
Mobile home parks or courts
N
N
N
15
Transient lodgings
N
N
N
16
Other residential
N
N
N
24
1 Ianufaeturing s
21
Food and kindred products;
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
-------manufacturing
0.56 IN APZ II
22
Textile mill products;
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
manufacturing
0.56 IN APZ II
23
Apparel and other finished
N
N
N
products; products made from
fabrics, leather and similar
materials; manufacturing
24
Lumber and wood products
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
(except furniture);
0.28 in APZ I &
manufacturing
0.56 in APZ II
25
Furniture and fixtures;
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
manufacturing
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ I1
26
Paper and allied products;
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
manufacturing
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
27
Printing, publishing, and
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
allied industries
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
28
Chemicals and allied
N
N
N
products; manufacturing
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -17
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in A:PZs, Continued
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
CLEAR ZONE
APZ -I
APZ -II
DENSITY
NO.
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
20
Manufacturing' (continued)
29
Petroleum refining and
N
N
N
related industries
30
Manufaeturings (continued)
31
Rubber and miscellaneous
N
N
N
plastic products;
manufacturing
32
Stone, clay, and glass
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
products; manufacturing
0.56 in APZ II
33
Primary metal products;
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
manufacturing
0.56 in APZ II
34
Fabricated metal products;
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
manufacturing
0.56 in APZ II
35
Professional, scientific,
N
N
N
and controlling instruments;
photographic and optical
goods; watches and clocks
39
Miscellaneous
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
manufacturing
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
40
Transportation,
communication, and
utilities 3' 4
41
Railroad, rapid rail transit,
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
and street railway
0.28 in APZ I &
transportation
0.56 in APZ II
42
Motor vehicle
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
transportation
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
43
Aircraft transportation
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
44
Marine craft transportation
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
45
Highway and street right-
Y
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
of -way
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
46
Automobile parking
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
47
Communication
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ TI
48
Utilities
N
Y6
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
0.56 in APZ II
48.5
Solid waste disposal
N
N
N
(landfills, incinerators, etc.)
49
Other transportation,
N
Y
Y
See Note 6 below
communication, and utilities
50
Trade
51
Wholesale trade
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR of
0.28 in APZ I &
.56 in APZ II
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -18
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in APZs, Continued
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
CLEAR ZONE
APZ -I
APZ -II
Density
NO.
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
50
Trade (,continued)
52
Retail trade — building
N
Y
Y
See Note 8 below
materials, hardware and farm
equipment
53
Retail trade — including
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
shopping centers, discount
of 0.16 in APZ II
clubs, home improvement
stores, electronics
superstores, etc.
54
Retail trade — food
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.24 in APZ II
55
Retail trade — automotive,
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
marine craft, aircraft, and
of 0.14 in APZ I
accessories
& 0.28 in APZ II
56
Retail trade — apparel and
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
accessories
of 0.28 in APZ II
57
Retail trade — furniture,
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
home, furnishings and
of 0.28 in APZ II
equipment
58
Retail trade — eating and
N
N
N
drinking establishments
59
Other retail trade
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.1.6 in APZ II
60
Services to
61
Finance, insurance and real
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
estate services
of 0.22 in APZ II
62
Personal services
N
N
Y
Office uses only.
Maximum FAR
of 0.22 in APZ 11.
62.4
Cemeteries
N
Y11
Y11
63
Business services (credit
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
reporting; mail,
of 0.22 in APZ II
stenographic, reproduction;
advertising)
63.7
Warehousing and storage
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
services 12
of 1.0 in APZ I;
2.0 in APZ II
64
Repair Services
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.11 APZ I;
0.22 in APZ II
65
Professional services
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.22 in APZ II
65.1
Hospitals, nursing homes
N
N
N
65.1
Other medical facilities
N
N
N
66
Contract construction
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
services
of 0.11 APZ I;
0.22 in APZ II
67
Government Services
N
N
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.24 in APZ 11
68
Educational services
N
N
N
68.1
Child care services, child
N
N
N
development centers, and
nurseries
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -19
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in A:PZs, Continued
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
CLEAR ZONE
APZ -I
APZ -II
Density
NO.
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
60
Services 10 (continued)
69
Miscellaneous N
N
Y Maximum FAR
of 0.22 in APZ II
69.1
Religious activities
N
N
N
70
Cultural; entertainment and recreational
71
Cultural activities
N
N
N
71.2
Nature exhibits
N
Y
Y
72
Public assembly
N
N
N
72.1
Auditoriums, concert halls
N
N
N
72.11
Outdoor music shells,
N
N
N
amphitheaters
72.2
Outdoor sports arenas,
N
N
N
spectator sports
73
Amusements — fairgrounds,
N
N
Y
miniature golf, driving
ranges; amusement parks,
etc.
74
Recreational activities
N
Y13
Yt3
Maximum FAR
(including golf courses,
of 0.11 in APZ I;
riding stables, water
0.22 in APZ II
recreation)
75
Resorts and group camps
N
N
N
76
Parks
N
Y13
Yt3
Maximum FAR
of 0.11 in APZ I;
0.22 in APZ II
79
Other cultural, entertainment
N
Y 1
Y1
Maximum FAR
and recreation
of 0.11 in APZ I;
0.22 in APZ II
80
Resource production and extraction
81
Agriculture (except live
Y
Y14
Yi4
stock)
81.5,
Livestock farming and
N
Y
Y 14,15
81.7
breeding
82
Agriculture related activities
N
Y14
Y14
Maximum FAR
of 0.28 in APZ I;
0.56 in APZ II,
no activity which
produces smoke,
glare, or involves
explosives
83
Forestry activities 16
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.28 in APZ I;
0.56 in APZ II,
no activity which
produces smoke,
glare, or involves
explosives
84
Fishing activities 17
N17
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
of 0.28 in APZ I;
0.56 in APZ II,
no activity which
produces smoke,
glare, or involves
explosives
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -20
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in A:PZs, Continued
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
CLEAR ZONE
APZ -I
APZ -II
Density
NO.
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
Recommendation'
80
Resource production and extraction
(continued)
85
Mining activities'8
N
Y1
Y1
Maximum FAR
of 0.28 in APZ I;
0.56 in APZ II, no
activity which
produces smoke,
glare, or involves
explosives
89
Other resource production or
N
Y
Y
Maximum FAR
extraction
of 0.28 in APZ 1;
0.56 in APZ II, no
activity which
produces smoke,
glare, or involves
explosives
90
Other
91
Undeveloped land
Y
Y
Y
93
Water areas19
N19
N19
N19
KEY TO TABLE 1 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN APZS
SLUCM — Standard Land Use Coding Manual, U.S. Department of Transportation
Y (Yes) — Land uses and related structures are normally compatible without restriction
N (No) — Land use and related structures are not normally compatible and should be prohibited.
Yx — Yes with restrictions. The land uses and related structures are generally compatible. However, see notes
indicated by the superscript.
Nx — No with exceptions. The land uses and related structures are generally incompatible. However, see notes
indicated by the superscript.
FAR — Floor Area Ratio. A floor area ratio is the ratio between the square feet of floor area of the building and
the gross site area. It is customarily used to measure non - residential intensities.
Du /Ac — Dwelling Units an Acre. This is customarily used to measure residential densities.
NOTES FOR TABLE 1 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN APZS
1. A "Yes" or a "No" designation for compatible land use is to be used only for general comparison. Within
each, uses exist where further evaluation may be needed in each category as to whether it is clearly compatible,
normally compatible, or not compatible due to the variation of densities of people and structures. In order to
assist air installations and local governments, general suggestions as to FARs are provided as a guide to
density in some categories. In general, land use restrictions that limit occupants, including employees, of
commercial, service, or industrial buildings or structures to 25 an acre in APZ I and 50 an acre in APZ II are
considered to be low density. Outside events should normally be limited to assemblies of not more that 25
people an acre in APZ I, and maximum assemblies of 50 people an acre in APZ IL Recommended FARs are
calculated using standard parking generation rates for various land uses, vehicle occupancy rates, and desired
density in APZ I and II. For APZ I, the formula is FAR = 25 people an acre /(Average Vehicle Occupancy x
Average Parking Rate x (43560/1000)). The formula for APZ II is FAR= 50 /(Average Vehicle Occupancy x
Average Parking Rate x (43560/1000)).
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -21
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in A:PZs, Continued
NOTES FOR TABLE 1 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN APZS
2. The suggested maximum density for detached single family housing is two Du/Ac. In a planned unit
development (PUD) of single family detached units where clustered housing development results in large open
areas, this density could possibly be increased slightly provided the amount of surface area covered by
structures does not exceed 20 percent of the PUD total area. PUD encourages clustered development that
leaves large open areas.
3. Other factors to be considered: Labor intensity, structural coverage, explosive characteristics, air - pollution,
electronic interference with aircraft, height of structures, and potential glare to pilots.
4. No structures (except airfield lighting and navigational aids necessary for the safe operation of the airfield
when there are no other siting options), buildings, or above - ground utility and communications lines should
normally be located in Clear Zone areas on or off the air installation. The Clear Zone is subject to the most
severe restrictions.
5. Rights -of -way for fenced highways, without sidewalks or bicycle trails, are allowed.
6. No above ground passenger terminals and no above ground power transmission or distribution lines.
Prohibited power lines include high - voltage transmission lines and distribution lines that provide power to
cities, towns, or regional power for unincorporated areas.
7. Development of renewable energy resources, including solar and geothermal facilities and wind turbines,
may impact military operations through hazards to flight or electromagnetic interference. Each new
development should to be analyzed for compatibility issues on a case -by -case basis that considers both the
proposal and potentially affected mission.
8. Within SLUCM Code 52, maximum FARs for lumberyards (SLUCM Code 52 1) are 0.20 in APZ -I and
0.40 in APZ -11. For hardware, paint, and farm equipment stores, SLUCM Code 525, the maximum FARs are
0.12 in APZ I and 0.24 in APZ 11.
9. A shopping center is an integrated group of commercial establishments that is planned, developed, owned,
or managed as a unit. Shopping center types include strip, neighborhood, community, regional, and super -
regional facilities anchored by small businesses, a supermarket or drug store, discount retailer, department
store, or several department stores, respectively. Included in this category are such uses as big box discount
clubs, home improvement superstores, office supply superstores, and electronics superstores. The maximum
recommended FAR for SLUCM 53 should be applied to the gross leasable area of the shopping center rather
than attempting to use other recommended FARs listed in Table 1 under Retail or Trade.
10. Ancillary uses such as meeting places, auditoriums, etc., are not recommended.
11. No chapels or houses of worship are allowed within APZ I or APZ II.
12. Big box home improvement stores are not included as part of this category.
13. Facilities must be low intensity, and provide no playgrounds, etc. Facilities such as club houses, meeting
places, auditoriums, large classes, etc., are not recommended.
14. Livestock grazing is a compatible land use, but feedlots and intensive animal husbandry are excluded.
Activities that attract concentrations of birds creating a hazard to aircraft operations should be excluded.
15. Feedlots and intensive animal husbandry are included as compatible land uses.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -22
DoDI4165.57, May 2, 2011
Table 1. Land Use Compatibility in APZs, Continued
NOTES FOR TABLE 1 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN APZS
16. Lumber and timber products removed due to establishment, expansion, or maintenance of Clear Zone
lands owned in fee will be disposed of in accordance with applicable DoD guidance.
17. Controlled hunting and fishing may be permitted for the purpose of wildlife management.
18. Surface mining operations that could create retention ponds that may attract waterfowl and present
bird/wildlife aircraft strike hazards (BASH), or operations that produce dust or light emissions that could affect
pilot vision are not compatible.
19. Naturally occurring water features (e.g., rivers, lakes, streams, wetlands) are pre - existing, nonconforming
land uses. Naturally occurring water features that attract waterfowl present a potential BASH. Actions to
expand naturally occurring water features or construction of new water features should not be encouraged. If
construction of new features is necessary for storm water retention, such features should be designed so that
they do not attract water fowl.
22 APPENDIX 2 TO ENCLOSURE 3
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -23
IN =610y My 1.1►1IlaaW001 -1161 [K•7►/i7WAVII H INN fia10904lMM06l9hfy
Suggested land use compatibility guidelines in noise zones are shown in Table 2. Additions to
some land use categories have been incorporated into Table 2 subsequent to issuance of the
SLUCM to reflect additional land uses and to clarify the categorization of certain uses. The land
use compatibility recommendations are provided for local governments as well as DOD
personnel for on -base planning.
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones
LAND USE
SUGGESTED LAND USE COMPATIBILITY
SLUCM
NO.
LAND USE NAME
DNL or
CNEL
65 -69
DNL or
CNEL
70 -74
DNL or
CNEL
75 -79
DNL or
CNEL
80 -84
DNL or
CNEL
85+
10
Residential
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11
Household units
N 1
N 1
N
N
N
11.11
Single units: detached
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.12
Single units: semidetached
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.13
Single units: attached row
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.21
Two units: side-by-side
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.22
Two units: one above the
other
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.31
Apartments: walk-up
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
11.32
Apartment: elevator
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
12
Group quarters
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
13
Residential hotels
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
14
Mobile home parks or courts
N
N
N
N
N
15
Transient lodgings
Ni
Ni
N'
N
N
16
Other residential
Ni
Ni
N
N
N
20
Manufacturing'
21
Food and kindred products;
manufacturing
Y
YZ
Y3
Y4
N
22
Textile mill products;
manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
23
Apparel and other finished
products; products made from
fabrics, leather, and similar
materials; manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
24
Lumber and wood products
(except furniture);
manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
25
Furniture and fixtures;
manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
26
Paper and allied products;
manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
27
Printing, publishing, and
allied industries
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -24
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones, Continued
Land Use
Suggested Land Use Compatibility
SLUCM
LAND USE NAME
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
NO.
CNEL
CNEL
CNEL
CNEL
CNEL
65 -69
70 -74
75 -79
80 -84
85+
20
Manufacturing (continued)
28
Chemicals and allied products;
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
manufacturing
29
Petroleum refining and related
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
industries
30
Manufacturing (continued)
31
Rubber and misc. plastic
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
products; manufacturing
32
Stone, clay and glass products;
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
manufacturing
33
Primary metal products;
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
manufacturing
34
Fabricated metal products;
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
manufacturing
35
Professional scientific, and
Y
25
30
N
N
controlling instruments;
photographic and optical
goods; watches and clocks
39
Miscellaneous manufacturing
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
40
Transportation,
communication and utilities
41
Railroad, rapid rail transit, and
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
street railway transportation
42
Motor vehicle transportation
Y
Y2
Y 3
Y4
N
43
Aircraft transportation
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
44
Marine craft transportation
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
45
Highway and street right -of-
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
way
46
Automobile parking
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
47
Communication
Y
255
305
N
N
48
Utilities
Y
Yz
Y3
Y4
N
49
Other transportation,
Y
255
305
N
N
communication and utilities
50
'Trade
51
Wholesale trade
Y
YZ
Y3
Y4
N
52
Retail trade — building
Y
25
30
Y4
N
materials, hardware and farm
equipment
53
Retail trade — including
Y
25
30
N
N
shopping centers, discount
clubs, home improvement
stores, electronics superstores,
etc.
54
Retail trade — food
Y
25
30
N
N
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -25
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones, Continued
Land Use
Suggested Land Use Compatibility
SLUCM
NO.
LAND USE NAME
DNL or
CNEL 65-
69
DNL or
CNEL
70 -74
DNL or
CNEL
75 -79
DNL or
CNEL
80 -84
DNL or
CNEL
85+
50
55
Trade Continued
Retail trade — automotive,
marine craft, aircraft and
accessories
Y
25
30
N
N
56
Retail trade — apparel and
accessories
57
Retail trade — furniture,
home, furnishings and
equipment
58
Retail trade — eating and
drinking establishments
Y
25
30
N
N
59
Other retail trade
Y
25
30
N
N
60
Services
61
Finance, insurance and real
estate services
Y
25
30
N
N
62
Personal services
Y
25
30
N
N
62.4
Cemeteries
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4°"
Y6 °"
63
Business services
Y
25
30
N
N
63.7
Warehousing and storage
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
64
Repair services
Y
Y2
Y3
Y4
N
65
Professional services
Y
25
30
N
N
65.1
Hospitals, other medical
facilities
25
30
N
N
N
65.16
Nursing homes
N'
N'
N
N
N
66
Contract construction
services
Y
25
30
N
N
67
Government services
Y'
25
30
N
N
68
Educational services
25
30
N
N
N
68.1
Child care services, child
development centers, and
nurseries
25
30
N
N
N
69
Miscellaneous
Y
25
30
N
N
69.1
Religious activities
Y
25
30
N
N
70
Cultural, entertainment and
recreational.
71
Cultural activities (&
churches
25
30
N
N
N
71.2
Nature exhibits
Y'
N
N
N
N
72
Public assembly
Y
N
N
N
N
72.1
Auditoriums, concert halls
25
30
N
N
N
72.11
Outdoor music shells,
amphitheaters
N
N
N
N
N
72.2
Outdoor sports arenas,
spectator sports
Y7
Y7
N
N
N
73
Amusements
Y
Y
N
N
N
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -26
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones, Continued
Land Use
Suggested Land Use Compatibility
SLUCM
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
DNL or
NO.
LAND USE NAME
CNEL 65-
CNEL
CNEL
CNEL
CNEL
69
70 -74
75 -79
80 -84
85+
70
Cultural, entertainment and recreational
continued
74
Recreational activities
Y
25
30
N
N
(including gold courses,
riding stables, water
recreation
75
Resorts and group camps
Y
25
N
N
N
76
Parks
Y
25
N
N
N
79
Other cultural,
Y
25
N
N
N
entertainment and recreation
80
Resource production and extraction
81
Agriculture (except live
Y8
Y9
Ylo
Y10,11
Y10,11
stock
81.5
Livestock fanning
Y8
Y9
N
N
N
81.7
Animal breeding
Y8
Y9
N
N
N
82
Agriculture related activities
Y8
Y9
Yio
Y10,11
Y10,11
83
Forestry activities
Y8
Y9
Yio
Y10,11
Y10,11
84
Fishing activities
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
85
Mining activities
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
89
Other resource production
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
or extraction
KEY TO TABLE 2 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN NOISE ZONES
SLUCM — Standard Land Use Coding Manual, U.S. Department of Transportation
Y (Yes) — Land use and related structures compatible without restrictions.
N (No) — Land use and related structures are not compatible and should be prohibited.
YX — Yes with restrictions. The land use and related structures generally are compatible. However,
see note(s) indicated by the superscript.
NX — No with exceptions. The land use and related structures are generally incompatible. However,
see note(s) indicated by the superscript.
25, 30, or 35 — The numbers refer to noise level reduction (NLR) levels. NLR (outdoor to indoor) is
achieved through the incorporation of noise attenuation into the design and construction of a structure.
Land use and related structures are generally compatible; however, measures to achieve NLR of 25,
30, or 35 must be incorporated into design and construction of structures. However, measures to
achieve an overall noise reduction do not necessarily solve noise difficulties outside the structure and
additional evaluation is warranted. Also, see notes indicated by superscripts where they appear with
one of these numbers.
DNL — Day -Night Average Sound Level.
CNEL — Community Noise Equivalent Level (normally within a very small decibel difference of
DNL)
Ldn — Mathematical symbol for DNL.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -27
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones, Continued
NOTES FOR TABLE 2 — LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN NOISE ZONES
1. General
a. Although local conditions regarding the need for housing may require residential use in these
zones, residential use is discouraged in DNL 65 -69 and strongly discouraged in DNL 70 -74. The
absence of viable alternative development options should be determined and an evaluation should be
conducted locally prior to local approvals indicating that a demonstrated community need for the
residential use would not be met if development were prohibited in these zones. Existing residential
development is considered as pre - existing, non - conforming land uses.
b. Where the community determines that these uses must be allowed, measures to achieve
outdoor to indoor NLR of at least 25 decibels (dB) in DNL 65 -69 and 30 dB in DNL 70 -74 should be
incorporated into building codes and be considered in individual approvals; for transient housing, an
NLR of at least 35 dB should be incorporated in DNL 75 -79.
c. Normal permanent construction can be expected to provide an NLR of 20 dB, thus the
reduction requirements are often stated as 5, 10, or 15 dB over standard construction and normally
assume mechanical ventilation, upgraded sound transmission class ratings in windows and doors, and
closed windows year round. Additional consideration should be given to modifying NLR levels based
on peak noise levels or vibrations.
d. NLR criteria will not eliminate outdoor noise problems. However, building location, site
planning, design, and use of berms and barriers can help mitigate outdoor noise exposure particularly
from ground level sources. Measures that reduce noise at a site should be used wherever practical in
preference to measures that only protect interior spaces.
2. Measures to achieve NLR of 25 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions
of these buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise sensitive areas, or where the normal
noise level is low.
3. Measures to achieve NLR of 30 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions
of these buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise sensitive areas, or where the normal
noise level is low.
4. Measures to achieve NLR of 35 must be incorporated into the design and construction of portions
of these buildings where the public is received, office areas, noise sensitive areas, or where the normal
noise level is low.
5. If project or proposed development is noise sensitive, use indicated NLR; if not, land use is
compatible without NLR.
6. Buildings are not permitted.
7. Land use is compatible provided special sound reinforcement systems are installed.
8. Residential buildings require an NLR of 25
9. Residential buildings require an NLR of 30.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -28
DoDI4165.57, May 2, 2011
Table 2. Land Use Compatibility in Noise Zones, Continued
NOTES FOR TABLE 2 LAND USE COMPATIBILITY IN NOISE ZONES
10. Residential buildings are not permitted.
11. Land use that involves outdoor activities is not recommended, but if the community allows such
activities, hearing protection devices should be worn when noise sources are present. Long -term
exposure (multiple hours per day over many years) to high noise levels can cause hearing loss in some
unprotected individuals.
28 APPENDIX 3 TO ENCLOSURE 3
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -29
GLOSSARY
PART I. ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AAD
average annual day
AB
average busy day
ADNL
A-weighted day-night average sound level
AICUZ
air installations compatible use zone
APZ
Accident Potential Zone
BASH bird or wildlife aircraft strike hazard
CNEL community noise equivalent level
dB
decibel
DNL
day-night average sound level
DODD
DOD Directive
DoDl
DOD Instruction
Du/Ac
dwelling units an acre
FAR
floor area ratio
FICON
Federal Interagency Committee on Noise
IFR instrument flight rules
JLUS joint land use study
NLR noise level reduction
OEA Office of Economic Adjustment
PUD planned unit development
SLUCM Standard Land Use Coding Manual
PART 11. DEFINITIONS
These terms and their definitions are for the purposes of this Instruction.
A — weighted. An expression of the relative loudness of sounds in air as perceived by the human
ear where the decibel values of sounds at low frequencies are reduced. By contrast, unweighted
decibels make no correction for audio frequency.
air installation. Fixed-wing and rotary-wing military airfields.
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B-30
DoDI4165.57, May 2, 2011
APZ I. The area beyond the Clear Zone that possesses a significant potential for accidents.
APZ IL The area beyond APZ I having a measurable potential for accidents.
area of critical concern. An area within the airfield environment as defined by the DOD
Component where land use controls may be desirable to protect long -term mission capability.
The development of the final boundary of areas of critical concern shall also take into account
natural and manmade features.
Class A runway. A runway primarily intended for small, light aircraft and that does not have the
potential for development for heavy or high performance aircraft use, or for which no
foreseeable requirements for such use exists. Ordinarily, less than 10 percent of the operations at
airfields with Class A runways involve aircraft in the Class B category and the runway(s) are less
than 8,000 feet long.
Class B runway. A runway primarily intended for high - performance and large, heavy aircraft.
For example, runways that accommodate heavy aircraft or have the potential for development to
heavy aircraft use.
Clear Zone. A surface on the ground or water beginning at the runway end and symmetrical
about the runway centerline extended.
United States. The several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealths of Puerto Rico
and the Northern. Mariana Islands, American. Samoa, Guam, Midway and Wake Islands, the
United States Virgin Islands, any other territory or possession of the United States, and
associated navigable waters, contiguous zones, and ocean waters of which the natural resources
are under the exclusive management authority of the United States.
30 GLOSSARY
Appendix B 2011 DOD Instruction for AICUZ Programs B -31
Appendix C Public Workshops and Comments C -1
OCTOBER 16, 2013 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO- RANDOLPH JOINT LAND USE STUDY
PUBLIC WORKSHOP
I GARDEN RIDGE COMMUNITY CENTER
9400 MUNICIPAL PARKWAY, GARDEN RIDGE, TX 78266
.
... . ......... ............ . .... .......... . ........
NAME
TeLEp HO Or4E N
E -MAIL ADDRESS,
MAILING ADDRESS '
M
C)
(D
E
O
O
E
0
0
CL
FOR IMMEDIATE MEDIA RELEASE: October 7, 2013
Public Workshop on Land Use Study around Joint Base San Antonio - Randolph
The public is invited to participate in a presentation and round table discussion of the Joint
Land Use Study (JLUS), which addresses compatibility planning for the areas surrounding
Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA)- Randolph, JBSA- Seguin Auxiliary Airfield, and Stinson
Municipal Airport. Bexar County, in cooperation with other communities, agencies, and
organizations in the region, is conducting a JLUS to identify existing and / or potential land
use issues that could impact the JBSA- Randolph missions and operations and to develop
recommendations to mitigate or prevent the issues identified.
The study's objective is to develop a set of recommendations that will guide compatibility
planning around JBSA- Randolph, JBSA- Seguin Auxiliary Airfield, and Stinson Municipal
Airport to accommodate new growth and economic development, protect public health
and safety, and sustain the operational missions of the base. The JLUS will explore how
JBSA- Randolph and local jurisdictions might work together through enhanced
communication and coordination to best achieve the mutual goals of all stakeholders.
There will be several public workshops held throughout the JLUS process.
The first public workshop will be held on:
Date: Wednesday, October 16, 2013
Time: 6 pm
Location: Garden Ridge Community Center
9400 Municipal Parkway
Garden Ridge, TX 78266
The JLUS will assess compatibility factors (man -made and / or natural factors), such as:
• Noise / Vibration a Interagency Coordination
• Aircraft Safety Zones a Water Quality / Quantity
• Roadway Capacity n Vertical Obstructions
• Light and Glare a Alternative Energy Development
The public is encouraged to join us at this workshop and learn more about this planning
process and provide input on the issues relevant to the JLUS. To develop a plan that is
responsive to local needs, it is critical to obtain input from the community.
For more information, about the JLUS project:
Visit the project's website at: www.jbsa- randolphjlus.com
or Contact: Bexar County Economic Development Department
Phone: 210 - 335 -0667
E -mail: jbsa -rjlus @bexar.org
Page ii Committee Draft September 2014
Appendix C Public Workshops and Comments C -4
Public Workshop #1
Date: October 16, 2013
Time: 6:oo pm to 8:oo pm
Garden Ridge Community Center
9400 Municipal Parkway
Garden Ridge, TX 78266
1. Welcome/ Introductions ................................................................... ............................... Bexar County
z. JBSA- Randolph Overview .................................................................... ..........................JBSA - Randolph
3. JLUS Overview ...................................................................... ............................... .........................Matrix
4. Overview of Compatibility Factors ....................................... ............................... .........................Matrix
5. Compatibility Factor Workshop Exercise ............................... ............................... Meeting Attendees
6. Next Steps ............................................................................. ............................... .........................Matrix
7. Adjourn ............................................................................................... ............................... Bexar County
Appendix C Public Workshops and Comments C -5
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
M " MINIM M.
MM d t
M
NAS Patuxent River J LUS
ffm
Cmm=
I
OF 0
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
Bexar County
Elected & Appointed
Officials
JBSA- Randolph
Representatives
Coordination
Accountability
Grant Management
Financial Contribution
Policy Direction
Study Oversight
Monitoring
Report Adoption
Planning Staff Technical Issues
Engineering Staff Alternatives
Technical Specialists = Report Development
Special Interests x Recommendations
All interested persons Public Input
Public Comments
C o ma `r
'c%e
3
%1110"',
ta`ex
kb,
7 W
il l i l" 4 :141" ^rti l IfIR t 3.,to
d'
a7m
mjTxTTTT
1, '� , "fi
,� ..: r � n� �'* irk �+
fox �'rcm„` „ �:r
'*vim,. t +u � _�
*,t
z r�
xm"'t �"`"Mi+rorow��da,ryttlk
{ nu
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
Ell
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
'r I
3
{
30,ODO ft
500'
ISO, �
(Primary Surface) EAF
EAE
t
4
�pp
1,000 ft.
�r Primary Surface
Yj { 2,050 ft,
� :f Eransitional Surface (MOD-8)
Norizontat Surface (MOD -C) `
} �F {tt 5 14,500 6tv F.
", fs 201 Conical Surface (MOD -D)
{,(
44,SOO ft.
Pu
t Outer Horizontal Surfa a Off -F
hops and Comments
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
Interagency Coordination Vertical Obstruction
Communication
m x 7
'` £ pry Y G { at
9�`P"N #� �� }Sits
s't��utft}
MA
wo� #t4i
MI
INS, "ON hiss. Mir
U Y , 14 -
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO- RANDOLPH JOINT LAND USE STUDY SCHERTZ CIVIC CENTER
FEBRAR 12 20 6:00 PM 8:00 PM
PUBLIC OSO P 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY, CHERTZ, TX 78154
E
P
O
0
0
CL
FEBRUARY 12,2014/6:00 PM -8:00 PM
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO- RANDOLPH JOINT LAND USE STUDY
PUBLIC WORKSHOP
SCHERTZ CIVIC CENTER
1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY, SCHERTZ, TX 78154
YN
6—a-1 0cpL
7F�16-
xt)
5t 0
Ai Ng
51�—
rz`�A L C Ill j'?t?X 43, C4
M
//Yl fros
v, i(k u, Y
r
----------
s
RS 6�5;qT�r,
-4 0, r; P.;-
T w a -Amu 7)
4
:�vs&
u
Pec
AA
7S-
C>
'Q L
c
JBSA-R—Public Wkshp 2 Sign In Sheet-2013 12 17 TW
Page of
CD
C.)
E
E
0
0
� ac)
CL
CD
E
P
0
0
0
CL
I mii
Mme
7
JOINT USA STUDY
'
Ell
SCHERTZ CIVIC CENTER
1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY, SCHERTZ, TX 78154
JBSA-R—Public Wkshp 2 Sign In Sheet 2013 12 17 TW
E
P
O
0
0
CL
FEBRUARY 12, 2014 / 6:00 PM - 8:00 PM JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO- RANDOLPH JOINT LAND USE STUDY SCHERTZ CIVIC CENTER
PUBLIC WORKSHOP 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY, SCHERTZ, TX 78154
I oil
4
2-1 z
(o nor-4i/Le Sr'l"eL - �?C' orcl
JBSA-R—Public Wkshp Sign In Sheet 2013 12 17 TW Page of
E (D
E
0
0
CL
FOR IMMEDIATE MEDIA RELEASE: January 15, 2014
Public Workshop on Land Use Study around Joint Base San Antonio - Randolph
The public is invited to participate in an interactive workshop in support of developing the Joint Land Use Study (JLUS).
The JLUS is a cooperative planning effort between Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA)- Randolph and the surrounding
communities. The objective of the study is to develop a set of recommendations that will promote well- suited
compatibility growth and economic development compatible with military training and operations being conducted at
JBSA- Randolph, JBSA- Seguin Auxiliary Airfield, and Stinson Municipal Airport.
The purpose of the second public workshop is to provide an update on the JLUS project, present the JBSA - Randolph
military mission footprint, and to obtain input from the public on prioritizing the compatibility issues, such as, land use,
noise and vibration, aircraft safety zones, vertical obstructions, and interagency coordination.
There will be four public workshops held throughout the JLUS process; this is the second in the series.
The second public workshop will be held on:
Date: Wednesday, February 12, 2014
Time: 6 pm
Location: Schertz Civic Center
Bluebonnet Room
1400 Schertz Parkway
Schertz, TX 78154
The public is encouraged to attend this workshop. It is critical to obtain input from the community in order to develop
a plan that is responsive to local needs. Please join us to hear about the JLUS and provide your input on local land use
issues relevant to the JLUS.
For more information, about the JLUS project:
Visit the project's website at: www,jbsa- randolphilus.com or Contact: Bexar County Public Works Department
Phone: 210 - 335 -0726
E -mail: jbsa -rjlus @bexar.org
'age iv Revised Committee Draft Background Report
Appendix C Public Workshops and Comments C -70
AGENDA
Public Workshop #2
Date: February 12, 2014
Time: 6:0o pm to 8:0o pm
Schertz Civic Center
Bluebonnet Room
1400 Schertz Parkway
Schertz, TX 78154
8. Welcome/ Introductions ................................................................... ............................... Bexar County
9. JLUS Overview/ Update ....................................................... ............................... .........................Matrix
lo. Presentation of Military Footprint ....................................... ............................... .........................Matrix
11. Presentation of Compatibility Issues ................................... ............................... .........................Matrix
12. Compatibility Issues Prioritization Exercise ......................... ............................... .........................Matrix
13. Next Steps ............................................................................. ............................... .........................Matrix
Revir;ed t ornniittee Draft Background Rerp rrt Page v
Appendix C Public Workshops and Comments C -71
Appendix C
e or a project re went tive to4igs 4 t.
Appendix C
�ec.�
-3—j