Loading...
10-24-2017 Agenda with backupMEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL OCTOBER 24, 2017 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 City of Schertz Core Values Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you would want to be treats Work together cooperatively as a tea Call to Order — Regular Session Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. ( Councilmember Thompson) Recognition and Presentation • Introduction of the Student Mayors and Student Councilmembers for the Day. (Mayor Carpenter) - Student Mayors — Dobie Jr. High, 8th Grade Michaela Martinez and Corbett Jr. High, 8th Grade Bailey Toda - Student Councilmembers — Dobie Jr. High, 7th Grade Delando Johnson and Corbett Jr. High, 7th Grade Madison. Didomenico • Introduction and recognition regarding the Fire Prevention Poster Contest winners. (D. Wait/K. Long) City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof: Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. 10 -24- 2017 - Council Agenda Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of `Residents portion of `the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Workshop • Presentation on recent SchertzQ event and update regarding upcoming City Events. (S. Gonzalez /L. Klepper /M. Spence) • Local Flavor Incentive Policy Update. (J. Kessel/K. Kinateder) (Item requested by Councilmember Davis) • Workshop and direction from City Council Regarding Training for City Council and Council. Appointed Boards, Commissions, and Committees regarding How Social. Media Use May be Impacted by the Public Information Act, Open Meetings Act, and Records Retention Policy (Item requested by Councilmember Crawford and Mayor Carpenter /D. Santee) Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember. 1. Minutes — Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of October 10, 2017. (J. Kessel /B. Dennis) 2. Ordinance No. 17 -S -39 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 1 General Provisions. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/E. Grobe) 3. Ordinance No. 17-S-40 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 3 Boards, Commissions and Committees and associated updates in UDC Articles 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood /E. Grobe) 4. Ordinance No. 17 -S -41— Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 4, Section. 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facility Agreements. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/C. Gould) 5. Ordinance No. 17 -S -42 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 4, Section 21.4.3 Notice Requirements. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/C. Gould) 6. Resolution No. 17 -R -92 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing a Public Library Interlocal Agreement with Guadalupe County. (B. James /M. Uhlhorn) 10 -24 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 2 - Discussion Items 7. Ordinance No. 17 -S -43 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 14, Section 21.1.4.6A Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails — requirements. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood /E. Grobe) 8. Cancellation of the November 7, 2017 City Council Meeting — Consideration and/or action cancelling the November 7, 2017 City Council meeting due to Election Night. (B. Dennis /Mayor /Council) 9. Calling a Special Meeting November 20, 2017 — Consideration and/or action calling a special meeting on Monday, November 20, 2017 to canvass the results of the November 7, 2017 . General Election. (J. Kessel/B. Dennis) 10. Resolution No. 17 -R -90 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement for the purchase of eight (8) Patrol Vehicles. (D. Wait /M. Hansen /M. Bane) 11. Resolution No. 17 -R -91 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing a fourth amendment to the interlocal agreement with the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) to provide demand - response public transportation. (B. James /B. James) 12. Resolution No. 1.7 -R -95 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution requesting permission to apply for the 2017 Homeland Security Division Grant Fund for Hazmat Equipment. (D. Wait/K. Long) 13. Resolution No. 17 -R -93 -- Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution establishing a public hearing date to consider land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for the designated service area. (B. James /K. Woodlee) 14. Resolution No. 17 -R -94 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing additional expenditures not to exceed $1,168,685 with Capital Excavation Company for the reconstruction of Schertz Parkway between Maske Road and Live Oak Road. (B. James /K. Woodlee /J. Nowak) 15. Ordinance No. 17 -A -44 -- Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance confirming and approving a boundary agreement establishing the municipal boundary between the City of Schertz and the City of Cibolo for property located within the Homestead development. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood/B. Cox) 16. Ordinance No. 17 -D -45 -- Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending the City of Schertz Code of Ordinances Section 86 -115 Maximum limits generally on specific streets by imposing a temporary construction speed zone from IH 35 frontage roads from MP 1.441 which is approximately 580' southwest of FM 1103, northeasterly to MP 1.668 which is approximately 618' northeast of FM 1103, for a 10 -24 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 3 - distance of 0.227 miles approximately to 45 MPH. First and Final Reading and declaring an emergency. (B. James /K. Woodlee /C. Palomo) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Closed Session 17. City Council will meet in closed session under section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code, Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations; Closed Meeting. The governmental body is not required to conduct an open meeting (1) to discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the governmental body and with which the governmental body is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect. Project E -033 Reconvene into Regular Session 17a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 17. Roll Call Vote Confirmation Requests and Announcements 18. Announcements by City Manager. 19. Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items be placed on a future City Council agenda. 20. Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers 21. Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR • Committee of Committees Advisory Board (CCAB), Boards and Commission Summary. (B. James) • Promotion of VFW Events in the City of Schertz. (S. Gonzalez /L. Klepper) Adiournment CERTIFICATION I, DONNA SCHMOEKEL, DEPUTY CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND 10 -24 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 4 - POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 201h DAY OF OCTOBER 2017 . AT 3:40 P.M. WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. DOvuvo SC hVVt0e[ -Zed Donna Schmoekel, Deputy City Secretar I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON DAY OF , 2017. Title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 210 -619 -1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Carpenter Councilmember Davis— Place 1 Audit Committee Schertz Housing Authority Board Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Interview Committee for Boards and Investment Advisory Committee Commissions Main Street Committee Main Street Committee - Chair TIRZ II Board Councilmember Gutierrez — Place 2 Councilmember Larson — Place 3 Main Street Committee — Vice Chair Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards — Place 4 Councilmember Thompson — Place 5 Audit Committee Audit Committee Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation Main Street Committee Councilmember Kiser — Place 6 Councilmember Crawford — Place 7 Schertz Animal Services Advisory Commission Schertz - Seguin Local Government Corporation Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions 10 -24 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 5 - nses 106- 617 - 532800 2017 - Estimated 2017 - Estimated 2017 - Estimated BBQTrophies $ 2,245.62 BBQ Cash Awards $ 10,150.00 Jackpot Beans 50/50 split $ 412.50 Kids Q Awards $ 153.17 Judging Supplies -Pool $ 502.07 Ice bins, bagged ice $ 450.00 Table, chair rental $ 285.00 IBCA Sanction Fees $ 35.00 IBCA Team fee $ 240.00 Head Cook fee, Mileage $ 787.80 Hotel Room for Judge $ 205.66 Aprons, 15 (one time fee) $ 253.92 Totals F $ < 15.720.74 Various Teamsl 33 Bean Entry @ 25.00 Various Teams 17 Cook's Choice Entry @ Various Teamsj 47 Earlybird Team @ Various Teams 14 Team @ Various Teams 7 Extra Space @ Vious arious 4 Food Vendor @ ar 2 Business Vendor @ Various 7 Craft/RetailVendors @ $200.00 $225.00 $100.00 $200.00 $200.00 $100.00 Re] $425.00 $425.00 $9,400.00 $3,150.00 $700.00 $13,250.00 $800.00 $400.00 $700.00 Entries, 8 8 Entries @ $25.00 $200.00 Supplies 1 $10.00 $10.00 Prof R - Loss Summar "Total . tl -17- IncomeM 0 M 0 MOO 0 Agenda No. 1 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Subject: City Secretary Minutes The City Council held a Regular Meeting on October 1.0, 2017. . HHZTG • ' • On RM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting on October 1.0, 2017. . ATTACHMENTS Regular Meeting of October 10, 2017 minutes. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING October 10, 2017 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on October 10, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James City Attorney Dan Santee City Secretary Brenda Dennis Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to Texas. (Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards) p.m. [N Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards provided the opening prayer followed by the pledges of allegiance to the flags of the United States and thic State of Texas:; • Announcements of upcomin'City Events (B. James/D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) ecutive Director Brian James who provided the following Saturday, October 7th — Sunday, October 22"d Free of charge to Schertz residents during the designated time frame. For more information contact 619 -1800 or 619 -1000. Tuesday, October 7, 2017 No City Council meeting — next one is Tuesday, October 24, 2017 . at 6:00 p.m. Saturday, October 21st Local Author Fair 1:00 pm — 3:00 pm, Schertz Library 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -1- Pro The library will host its second local author fair on Saturday, October 21" from 1 -3 PM. This event will showcase approximately 10 -12 local area, published authors, representing both youth and adult literature. Selected authors will share a little about their work and themselves. Attendees will have the opportunity to visit with and purchase books from the authors. Contact the Adult Services Librarian, Lizzie Betoia at 619 -1725 for more information. Thursday, October 261 Simonson Volunteer Abbreciation Dinner 6:30 Friday, Saturday and Sunday, October 2711 -2911 Skvfiaht Balloon Fest River City Community Church Grounds, 16765 Lookout Road, This family friendly event features competitions, tethered b, trackless train rides, vendors and musical concerts. Contact the more information. Saturday, October 28, 2017 — Pickrell Park. Announcements and recognitions byCity, Manager (J. Solis- Center John K`essel who wanted to recognize our Web Project Team, ". They have recently rolled out 1.0 a.m. this morning. Mr. Kessel encouraged to functional and has better navigability for the )r Myles Clauser and involved Tony McFalls, edman, Ray Nichols and James Walters. They ie project was finished on time and on budget phase 2. Mr. Kessel congratulated all the team Domestic Violence Awareness Month. (Mayor Carpenter/N. Mayor Carpenter recognized Regional Crime Victim Liaison. Nicole Solis - Douglass and Aston Story with the Guadalupe Valley Family Violence Shelter who accepted the proclamation. Ms. Douglass thanked the city for their continued support and invited Council to their annual Candlelight Vigil, October 25, 2017, 6:00 p.m. at the Pickrell Park small pavilion. • Proclamation recognizing Fire Prevention Week. (Mayor Carpenter /K. Long) 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - Mayor Carpenter recognized Fire Chief Kade Long and Fire Marshall John Perry who accepted the proclamation. Chief Long indicated that during the month of October the Fire Department is recognizing Fire Prevention. New Employee Recognition Police Lidia Mendoza, Communications Officer, Donald Robinson, Police Officer, Anna Kraft, Danielle Dunnahoe Police Officer, Nathan Crane, Police Officer (M. Hansen) Animal Services – Mackenzie Taubert, Animal Shelter Tech, (D. Hernandez) EMS – Heather Cornell, EMS Billing Clerk, Richard Wiggins, Paramedic (PT), Amanda Hausman, Paramedic (J. Mabbitt) Public Affairs —Sarah Salazar, Civic & Community Center Coordinator (L. Klepper) Development Services —James Cowey, Building Inspector (L. Wood) Finance —Diana Perez Ortiz, Accountant I (J. Walters),,,", Mayor Carpenter recognized each department head who introduced their new stafflnember(s) and provided a brief bio on each one. New employees expressed Their appreciation. Mayor and Councilmembers welcomed them all aboard. Mayor Carpenter recognized City Judge Darrell. Dullnig who `wa. in the audience this evening. Closed Session Mayor Carpenter convened into Closed Session at 15.•38 p Ia. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 1. Mayor : "Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who moved, seconded by Councilmeniber Thompson to appoint Mr. Floyd Akers effective immediately. The vote was 6 -1 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion passed. Mayor Carpenter moved to the Hearing of`Residents section of the agenda. Hearing of Residents Mayor Carpenter recognized the following individuals who spoke: 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page - 3 - • Mr. John Sellers, 1.068 Williamsburg, who thanked those who attended and assisted in their first Friends 4 Fischer House fundraiser car show and food truck showdown. He stated that he is looking forward to working with staff for the next year's event. • Mr. Roger Booker, 11901 Trail Hill Lane, who stated he has lived in Schertz for some time and he is here tonight to let Council know he is not happy with what is going on in the City. He spoke regarding a Councilmember's recent Facebook post and his use of the `N' word at the September 12th meeting. He personally has a problem with this and has a problem with the City Council not holding him responsible for his actions. He believes that not doing this makes the council look untrusting. Mr. Booker provided three examples of individuals who used or did inappropriate things and were fired. Mr. Booker spoke on accountability and believes there is none in this situation. Mr. Booker stated he sent a letter to the Mayor and received no response. Again, Mff Booker believes that Council needs to hold Councilmember Thomnson accountable. • Ms. Maggie Titterington, The Chamber President, who mentioned tomorrow evening is the `Meet the Candidates' event for the City of Schertz and the School District. The event will be held at the Schertz Civic Center from 6a0 p`in. to 7:30 p.m. The event will be moderated by Tim Brown of Re /Max Realtors. Ms. Titterington provided an update regarding the Lower'Vlley School building currently located at Northeast Lakeview College. They had it transferred to them because the intent was to utilize the building as an educational facility., She stated that this was the first school house for Schertz-Cibolo- Marian students. The Lower Valley School House Committee, of which ,she as a part of for 7 years; have decided to sunset the project. They have been unable to raise the funds needed to renovate the building to be usable as an education total f6x 4th graders to come visit, which was the original intent. The college, is unable to,' expend arty more funds on it and have already expended over $300,000. The eommitteo raised about $150,000, which was used to get rid of the lead paint and asbestos: The original project was quoted at $800,000 to get it up and running atid.,they can't do that The community has not supported it and they have exhausted all other �",efforts. They are now salvaging the items that were inside, which many have deteriorated due to being stored in a container that was not climate controlled. She stated she is working with the SCUCISD and NLC to have them secure an inter -local agreement that will release the artifacts into the possession of the school. From that point, she has requested several items for the Visitors Center so that she can help keep alive the memory of the former teachers, Mr. &Mrs. Watts, and what was the first original school in our area. • Mr. David Scagliola, 341.8 Foxbriar Lane, who provided commentary on why he is running for City Council Place 5. He also provided examples of things that were accomplished when he was on City Council while working as a team with the other members. He stated we have a lot of challenges and opportunities ahead of us. His thinking is if we work as a team starting with the City Council, City Staff, residents, SCUCISD, Business Community and if we work as a team based on mutual respect and 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page - 4 - trust, our glory days are yet to come. He wants to be part of that team. He asked for support as he is running for City Council. PrvePntatinn • Presentation regarding the upcoming November 7, 2017 Election. (B. Dennis) Mayor Carpenter recognized City Secretary Brenda Dennis who provided an update of the upcoming local election regarding locations, dates and times for early voting and election day in Comal, Guadalupe and Bexar counties. She also provided now information being rolled out by the Guadalupe Election Administrator regarding election day vote centers. Ms. Dennis addressed questions from Council and stated that all this information can be found on the city website or call the City Secretary's office if thei,tre other questions. • Presentation by Animal Services regarding recent coyote sightings. (D: Wait /D. Hernandez /L. Tschirhart -Heji) t who introduced Ms. Debbie Services Department for nine ;es Manager we made her the rr., Wait stated that a couple of about coyotes with a higher said here is a problem, please arranged for a special guest Her recommendation is to educate the public regarding coyotes by getting rid of food sources, keep lids on trash cans, keep a close eye on your children and pets. When walking your pet, keep a walking stick with you to protect yourself and make yourself appear bigger. Keep rocks in your pocket to throw at them and if you see an aggressive coyote, call the police department. Learn ways to co -exist with coyotes. • Update on the progress of the new city website design. (M. Clauser /B. James) Mayor Carpenter recognized IT Director Myles Clauser who provided information on the launch of the new city's website. He mentioned that he and a team of employees have 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page - 5 - been working on this for over a year. Mr. Clauser stated that as more of the staff becomes tech savvy they will be able to update their own content and not have to rely so much on the IT staff or Public Affairs staff. Mr. Clauser gave a shout out to the team. He stated it truly was a team effort and the results are a quality product. Mayor and Council provided their comments regarding the new website and Mr. Clauser addressed their questions. The Mayor and Council congratulated the team on the new website results. Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items u Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmen 2. Minutes — Approval of the minutes of the Re Kessel /B. Dennis) 3. Ordinance No. 17 -K -37 — Consideration ands and terminating a drainage easement on Lots Mesa Oaks Subdivision. Final Reading (B. Jai The following was read into W arponter recognized Councilmember Davis who moved, seconded by iember Crawford to approve consent agenda items 2 and 3. The vote was pus with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Thompson, iser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion P Mayor Carpenter stated that we have public hearings on Items 4 through 8. He stated that the normal way, is;.we have staff come before us and give a brief presentation on each item, we open the public hearing for comments and then close the public hearing for Council comments. Mayor Carpenter stated that he would like staff to give a brief presentation on each one, as most of the information is already in the council packets. Mayor Carpenter requested staff walk through each one as they all are related and then we can address questions during the public hearing. 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page - 6 - Discussion Items 4. Ordinance No. 17 -S -39 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified PH Development Code, Article 1 General Provisions. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood /E. Grobe) The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -39 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE 'OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISION; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Carpenter recognized Director of Planning, `Community Development Lesa Wood and Planner Emily Grobe who walked the Council through the proposed changes to Article 1. time to time, 'on, its own motion, or at the nents and may, change or modify text to any i sound, stable and desirable development. It y review development regulations due to State and Federal regulations. Based on the and changes in development practices, staff Over' the last couple of dears planning 'staff has been gathering information, preparing revisions to the UDC and coordinating review of the document with legal counsel. At the beginning of 2017 staff began sparing amendments to Article 1. The majority of the proposed amendments provide clarification and eliminate unnecessary language. Additio ally, updates to this Article have been made to expand upon the Vested Rights provision' and add language associated with the City of Sehertz Planning and Community Development Department — Planning Division, Development Manual and the :Public Works Specifie tion Manual. This amendment was drafted by Planning Staff and reviewed by the City Attorney. A Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page - 7 - • Minor text amendments have been made to a reference to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and to refine language to be consistent with the Texas Local Government Code (TLGC). This includes the elimination of the Sections related to Minimum Requirements; Effective Date; and Severability. • Sec. 21.1.4 Jurisdiction was modified in order to provide consistency with the LGC and to add a list of Articles to clearly indicate which provisions of the UDC apply to properties located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). • Sec. 21.1.5 Consistency with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) was modified to simply note that the UDC is intended to implement the goals and objectives of the CLUP. The change removes text that quotes sections of the CLUP to eliminate any potential conflict with the UDC and em h size the important aspect of this Section. • Sec. 21.1.6 Vested Rights "Issuance of Local Permits" Wa modified to include definitions, outline a procedure to claim vested rights, requirements to obtain a determination, and provide property owners the right to appeal the determination to the City Council. Over the last few years . City Staff has had several cases where developers have requested vested rights baser can provisions in the LGG that provides landowners or developers an opportunity to vest (grandfather) regulations that apply to their project. The UDC has an existing section regarding vested rights but with the increased requests the modification to include procedures and expiration dates will assist in processing a request.` T"he aclusion of the expiration dates is intended to ensure compliance with the LGC while not extending jested rights beyond what is required in the LGC. Carpenter stated that unless there is objection from Council, Mayor Carpenter zed Councilmetnber Larson who agreed with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards that should have individual considerations. As there Avere no objections Mayor Carpenter recognized staff who recapped Article 1. amendments, rioting the changes. Mayor Carpenter opened the public hearing and as no one spoke, closed the public hearing for Council comments. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Larson who aked for clarification regarding the vested rights, changes made were for clarifying procedures and not changing vested rights or changes in fees. Staff concurred, stating the only change that is the most substance is that we have expiration dates on projects. The Local Government Code allows for that provision and we did not. This helps the developer to understand where 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page - 8 - their vested rights are and gives them a deadline date. Ms. Wood further explained the vested rights portion change. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Larson who wanted to know for clarification regarding the vested rights, that there are no changes in the fees; staff concurred. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Davis who asked if the redline was available; staff indicated that they could provide this, but it might serve Council well to come in and meet with staff so that they can go over the 'propoged changes with our current UDC as the changes are so substantial. Councilmember Crawford asked if Council could have what was presented to Planning and Zoning. Executive Director Brian James statd,that council could certainly watch the video which is on our website. The following INANCE NO. 17 -5 -40 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 3 BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES AND ASSOCIATED UPDATES IN UDC ARTICLES 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14;-REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT I WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Carpenter recognized Planner Emily Grobe who stated staff has been in the process of gathering information to prepare revisions to the UDC and then review of the document with legal counsel. Full review and drafting of the amendment began in early 2017. The proposed amendments provide clarification to language and include the creation of a new board, the `Building and Standards Commission'. This will provide an appropriate outlet for applicants requesting review of a building code item, appealing a decision of the 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -9- Fire Marshal or Chief or the Building Official and to review and take actions on buildings found to be in violation of a city ordinance or one deemed to be a public nuisance. Additionally, items previously heard by the Board of Adjustments that were not true zoning items can now be heard by a more appropriate board. Generally speaking, a lot of language was cleaned up for clarity, simplified, updated, and relocated more appropriately to their proper section(s). They created Section 22.3.6.D: Building and Standards Comrrnission, who would hear cases relative to ordinance violations, building or fire code. Mayor Carpenter opened the public hearing. As no one,spoke,' Mayor Carpenter closed the public hearing. Ms. Grobe and Executive Director Brian James answered questions from Council. Mr. James also added that they would begin furnishing Council a short synopsis of discussions of items that the various city boards are working on each month. This will be the same document furnished to the Committee ,cif Committee's Advisory Board at their monthly meetings. This may help Council stay updated on what the city boards are doing. Mayor Carpenter stated he feels this,` i a way to give the"; citizens another outlet to an appropriate body to go to if they feel they :have a legitimate argument to something different than what appears in the UDC.. We are better serving the community in this way. Mayor Carpenter ' rdcogn zed Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Councilmembet Gutierrez 6 approve Ordinance No. 17 -S -40 first reading. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompsou,,,, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 6. Ordinance No. 17 -5 -41 -; Conduct a public hearing and consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified PH Development Code; Article ; 4, Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facility Agreements. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood/C, Gould) The followinp- was =read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -41 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 4, SECTION 21.4.15 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED UPDATES IN UDC ARTICLES 9, 12, AND 16; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page - 10 - OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Carpenter recognized Planner Channary Gould who provided a general background of information of what this section covers. Again, staff decided to update this section to provide more clarity for the end users (developers). There were some inconsistencies in the original language which they have now revised and updated. During this process staff also looked at other cities to compare their processes with what we had. This assisted them in the revision recommendations. In September this revision was brought before the Planning and Zoning Commission who voted unanimously .to recommend approval to Council. Some changes include revising the term 'Community Facilities Agreements' to "Improvement Agreements'. The updated current" Subsection ' 21.4.15.13 Application Requirements and Subsection 21.4.15C Processing of Application and Decision contains several other changes regarding submittal requirements and referencing the Engineering Department. They added subsections for expirations and. , extensions and increased the warranty bond period from one year to two years. Minor modifications were made to clean up unnecessary language. Mayor Carpenter, recognized Councilmomber Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards` to apprrave Ordinance No. 17 -S -41 first reading. The vote was -unanimous with Mayor Pro "Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson,'Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed: 7. Ordinance No. 17 -S-42 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action approving an, ' Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified PH Development Code, Article 4, Section 21.4.3 Notice Requirements. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood /C. Gould) The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -S -42 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page - 11 - AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 4, SECTION 21.4.3 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND ASSOCIATED UPDATE TO UDC SECTION 21.5.4.0.2; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Carpenter recognized Planner Channary Gould who_ stated the Planning Commission had requested staff research posting public hearing notice signs for zone change requests. After doing research by looking at other jurisdictions' UDC requirements, speaking to their staff members and talking with our City's sign shop, the staff is aroposing revisions to UDC Section 21.4.3 and 21.5.5.C.2. Currently they are proposing posting notices showed a draft version of what a sign would items, such as date, time, and location. The rc Section 21.4.3 Amendment as follows.: 1) Posting timeframe has to coincide with wri 2) Posting is to remain through the duratibu, public hearings. 3) This refers to the development Manual,"" sign content and site criteria and 4) 'the a signs remain 'posted'' at', the site. Under amendment to 'add a posted notice reauird zone change applications. Ms. Gould like. It Would cover d few essential -menu for posting would be under the A ion and City Council rich will include sign posting criteria and plicant would be responsible for ensuring Section 21.5.4 there would also be an ent for Zone Change applications. The Planning and Zotiing Commission met on September 13 and voted unanimously in favor "rsf the proposal. No, additional fees are being added. Based on the city's history of zone change app)ications in recent years (about 46) a rough estimated annual cost for signs would be around $500. taff recommends approval of this proposal. ter opened the public hearing and the following individual(s) spoke: • Mr. Glen Outlaw, 3927 Forsyth Park, who stated the Planning and Zoning Commission initiated this and staff has been working on it for quite a while. Their concern was that often these case "do affect more than just the people located adjacent to it. They were looking for a way to make more of the public aware of what was going on. Posting these signs seemed like a good way to make folks aware as they were going in and out of their neighborhood(s). As was mentioned earlier, the vote was unanimous by the Commission. As no one else spoke, Mayor Carpenter closed the public hearing for Council comments. Mayor Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who moved, seconded by Councilmember Thompson to approve Ordinance No. 17 -S -42 first reading. The vote was 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -12 - unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Mayor Carpenter and Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards both congratulated staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission members for a job well done. 8. Ordinance No. 17 -S -43 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action PH approving an Ordinance amending Part III Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code, Article 14, Section 21.14.6A Sidewalks ;and Hike and Bike Trails — requirements. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood /E. Grobp The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO 17- Sidewalks shall be required along both sides of all streets throughout the City as required in Section 2.`1-;14.1. All lots must have access to sidewalks. Ms. Grobe staled that the current developments would not have to come in and do sidewalks, but any new /proposed developments would have to provide them to city specifications. Mayor Carpenter opened the public hearing and recognized Mr. John Sullivan, 513 Triple Crown, who spoke in favor of removing the exemption for sidewalks along IH 35. He encouraged Council to pass this. He feels this is good for the businesses as well. 10 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -13 - As there were no other speakers, Mayor Carpenter closed the public hearing and opened it up to Council for discussion. Ms. Grobe addressed questions /comments from Council. Councilmember Larson expressed his concerns regarding adding /raising costs associated with businesses considering locating within the city. While these costs can be passed on to developers, the large businesses are able to absorb this additional expense a lot easier than the small entrepreneurs, putting them at a major disadvantage. Other councilmembers weighed in expressing their opinions agreeing that while this may be the case, the ability to furnish sidewalks for citizens and city visitors also contributes to pedestrian convenience and safety and promotes a more walkable friendly community. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson Who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve Ordinance No. 17- S- 43:first reading. The vote was 6 -1 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Couucilmembers'Davis, Gutierre Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion passed. 9. Resolution No. 17 -R -87 — Consideration and /or action approving Resolution authorizing a development agreement with Paul and ,Nary Rundus related to a 39 acre tract of land approximately 3500 feet north of the intersection of Trainer Hale Road and Weir Road. (B. James /L. Wood/B. Cox) The following was read into record: RESOLI Mayor Carpenter 1rognized ,Senior Planner Bryce Cox who provided background information regarding,, When the city entered into the first development agreement. Under annexation laws at the time, anyone having a tax exemption under Chapter 23 of the Texas Tax Code, Subchapter C, D, or E (agriculture, wildlife preservation or timberland exemptions) were offered a delayed (10 years) annexation development agreement. On this agenda 'item, the current property owners (Paul and Mary Rundus) have approached the city as it is their desire to subdivide their property into six total lots to build homes for family members. There were original agreement restrictions that required the owners to come to the city for consent regarding changing their land use and /or subdividing their property. Staff requests Council guidance in making this decision. Mr. Cox explained how staff weighed in on their recommendation by looking at the original main goal of the city in their desire to prevent uncontrolled development. The current applicant is requesting to remain in the ETJ; however, at the end of their 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -14 - agreement they are subject to voluntary annexation. The main modification to this agreement is the provision to allow a subdivision of up to six lots with a minimum of five acres and the ability to build a single- family dwelling on each lot—in compliance with all city requirements. What they are wanting to do is compliant with city requirements. Staff recommends approval. Mr. Cox addressed comments and questions from Council. Councilmember Thompson made a motion to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -87. Senior Planner Bryce Cox interposed at that moment stating that there was a typo on page 2 of the original agreement; where it stated `Guadalupe' County, it .shopuld be `Bexar County'. Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards asked Councilmember Thompson to amend his motion. Mr. Thompson withdrew his original motion and restated the motion. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moped, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve Resolution No. 171: -7 knowing there will be a change in the document from Guadalupe County to Bexar County. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one , toting no. Motion passed. 10. Resolution No. 17 -R -88 – Consideration and/or­, action approving a Resolution authorizing a construction contract with Tank Pro, Inc. for construction services in connection with repainting of an elevated water storage tan*: (D.,Wait /J. Hooks) The following was read into record: SOLUTION NO. 17 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A CONTRACT WITH ' TANK PRO, 1, INC. FOR THE SCHERTZ ELEVATED STOHAGH.TANK REPAINTING PROJECT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH TERMS OF THE CONTRACT AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized Assistant Public Works Director Jimmy Hooks who stated this item, authorized the city manager to enter into an agreement to have the elevated water storage tank on FM 3009 and FM 2252 repainted. Eight bids were received, and they selected the ontractorbased on their qualifications and experience, available resources, corporate history' and stability, references and cost. The engineers had provided an estimate of $440'000 and Tank Pro's bid was $391,537. With additional city related expenses added into the job, the cost will be $468,537 which will come out of the water reserve fund. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -88. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page -15 - 11. Resolution No. 17 -R -89 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing the Dedication Acceptance of one (1) 1622.22 sq /ft Sanitary Sewer Easement along the Maske Road ROW from the Jonas Woods LTD HOA for placement, maintenance and repairs of a sanitary Sewer Line. (D. Wait /J. Hooks) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -89 Mayor Carpenter recognized Assistant Public Work& Director Jimmy Hooks who stated staff is requesting to accept a sewer line easement from Tonas Woods HOA. Mr. Hooks addressed questions /comments fro Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Th on who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to ,approve Resolution No. 17 -R -9. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro- Tem -Ed 4fds, Councilm tubers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Mayor C 12. la -11. No further 13. Mayor and C Dennis who provided the roll call vote for by City Manager. were made. members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who stated he recently attended two events in the city: 1) the MIA /POW event (sparsely attended) and the Knights of Columbus event (300+ attendees). He requests that the City coordinate some communication with the VFW to see if we can utilize the public relations aspect of the city to promote something that is very worthy down in the future. Mr. Kessel took note of this. 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -16 - Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Crawford who stated he would like to see a committee of the HOA presidents meet with city staff in an effort to coordinate efforts on the local code compliance issues. While not urgent, he would like to put that on staff's shoulders. Mayor Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who stated The Chamber President Maggie Titterington gave a presentation about the school house. He was hoping she could come back and provide some more information (fund raiser statistics, education foundation funding, appraised value of the property ($800,000 ?); the cost of moving it ?). It can be another presentation or an e -mail containing the data. Without it, they cannot make an informed decision. *Mayor Carpenter asked to simply provide that information to them and then if they need to put it on a future agendalater,oh, they can request it. Councilmember Thompson reminded everyone that speed was of the essence on this matter because if nothing happens, the buildingis scheduled 'tt be removed and/or demolished by the end of December. 14. Announcements by Mayor and C Mayor Carpenter also mentioned the Friends 4 Fischer House fundraiser car show and food truck sht wdo n. They had a great turnout. The POW -MIA ceremony was not well attended, and wd`need to see what we can do to help that. It is a subject we need to keep our eyes and mind on. He also attended the Campanan Nangan Filipino Heritage luncheon event put on in our park (annually). It was another great event. Adjournment As there was no further business, Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at 10:45 p.m. 1.0 -10 -2017 Minutes Page -17 - Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary 1.0 -10 -201.7 Minutes Page - 18 - Agenda No. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 17 -S -39— Consideration and/or action on an amendment of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 1. General Provisions. (Final Reading) BACKGROUND As stated in the UDC, City Council from time to time, on its own motion, or at the recommendation of City Staff make amendments, may change or modify text to any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. It is considered good practice to periodically review development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations. Based on the update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and changes in development practices staff is recommending updates to the UDC. Over the last couple of years planning staff has been gathering information, preparing revisions to the UDC and coordinating review of the document with legal counsel. At the beginning of 2017 . staff began preparing amendments to Article 1. The majority of the proposed amendments provide clarification and eliminate unnecessary language. Additionally, updates to this Article have been made to expand upon the Vested Rights provision and add language associated with the City of Schertz Planning and Community Development Department — Planning Division, Development Manual and the Public Works Specification Manual. This amendment was drafted by Planning Staff and reviewed by the City Attorney). Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. . City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of October 1.0, 2017. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: • Minor text amendments have been made to a reference to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and to refine language to be consistent with the Texas Local Government Code (LGC). This includes the elimination of the Sections related to Minimum Requirements; Effective Date; and Severability. City Council Memorandum Page 2 • Sec. 21.1.4 Jurisdiction was modified in order to provide consistency with the LGC and to add a list of Articles to clearly indicate which provisions of the UDC apply to properties located in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). • Sec. 21.1.5 Consistency with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) was modified to simply note that the UDC is intended to implement the goals and object of the CLUP. The change removes text that quotes sections of the CLUP to eliminate any potential conflict with the UDC and emphasize the important aspect of this Section. • Sec. 21.1.6 Vested Rights "Issuance of Local Permits" was modified to include definitions, outline a procedure to claim vested rights, requirements to obtain a determination, and provide property owners the right to appeal the determination to the City Council. Over the last few years City Staff has had several cases where developers have requested vested rights based on provisions in the LGC that provides landowners or developers an opportunity to vest (grandfather) regulations that apply to their project. The UDC has an existing section regarding vested rights but with the increased requests the modification to include procedures and expiration dates will assist in processing a request. The inclusion of the expiration dates is intended to ensure compliance with the LGC while not extending vested rights beyond what is required in the LGC. Goal To amend the UDC to review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations as well as establish and maintain . sound stable and desirable development. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Review and approve Ordinance 17 -5 -39 amending the UDC, Article 1 General Provisions. FISCAL IMPACT �►i�1iT- 1• The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on September 13, 2017 . and offered a unanimous recommendation of approval. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -5 -39 an amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 1 General Provisions as presented. ATTACHMENT City Council Memorandum Page 3 Ordinance No. 1.7 -S -39 UDC Article 1 General Provisions — Red Lines ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -S -39 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISION; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10 -S -06, the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") adopted as Amended and Restated Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the "Current UDC "); and WHEREAS, City Staff and has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revision and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; WHEREAS, on September 13, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and thereafter recommended approval; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and in the interest of the public safety, health and welfare; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Approved on first reading the l Oth day of October, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 24th day of October, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) o l • Unified Development Code Article 1 General Provisions See Attached Article 1 General Provisions Sec. 21.1.1 Short Title Chapter 21 of the City of Schertz Code of Ordinances shall be known and may be cited as the Unified Development Code of the City of Schertz, Texas or simply as the Unified Development Code or the UDC. Sec. 21.1.2 Purpose and Intent This UDC is adopted to: • protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City; • ensure the safe, orderly and efficient development and expansion of the City in accordance with and pursuant to its Comprehensive Land Plan and Master Thoroughfare Plan; • conserve, develop, protect and utilize natural resources, in keeping with the public interest; • prevent the overcrowding of land and avoid undue concentration or diffusion of population; • protect and conserve the value of land throughout the City and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and to minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings; • provide for open space; • minimize pollution of air and water, assure the adequacy of drainage facilities, safeguard water resources and preserve the integrity and aesthetic quality of the community; • lessen congestion in the streets and provide convenient, safe and efficient circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic; and • facilitate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, wastewater, schools, parks, public safety and recreational facilities, and other public facilities and services. Sec. 21.1.3 Authority This UDC is adopted pursuant to the powers granted to the City and subject to any limitations imposed by the constitution and other laws of the State of Texas and the City Charter. Sec. 21.1.4 Jurisdiction The provisions of this UDC apply to all property within the corporate limits of the City and in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) as listed in part B below. A. Jurisdiction within City Limits The City has the statutory authority to exercise a broad range of powers within its City limits. Many of those powers are specifically authorized by Chapters 211, 212, and 216 of Texas Local Government Code, as amended (LGC). All provisions of this UDC apply within the City limits. B. Jurisdiction within Extraterritorial Jurisdiction The City extends to its ETJ the regulation of subdivisions and property development adopted under LGC Chapter 21.2. The City also extends to its ETJ its authority to regulate signage as adopted under LGC Chapters 216, 245, and 43 in its ETJ. The following Articles of this UDC apply within the ETJ: 1. Article 1 — General Provisions 2. Article 3 — Boards and Commissions 3. Article 4 — Procedures and Applications 4. Article 9 — Sec. 21.9. 10 Parkland and Open Space Dedication Requirements 5. Article 9 — Sec. 21.9.11 Lighting and Glare Standards 6. Article 11 — Signs and Advertising Devices 7. Article 13 — Land Disturbing Activities 8. Article 14 — Transportation 9. Article 15 — Easements and Utilities 10. Article 16 —Definitions Sec. 21.1.5 Consistency with Comprehensive Land Plan and Master Thoroughfare Plan This UDC is intended to implement the policies and objectives contained in the Comprehensive Land Plan and Master Thoroughfare Plan for the City and provide for adequate and necessary public facilities and service. Sec. 21.1.6 Vested RiLrhts "Issuance of Local Permits" A. Introduction LGC Chapter 245 — Issuance of Local Permits, commonly referred to as the State's "Vested Rights Law ", provides an opportunity for landowners or developers to "grandfather" or "vest" government regulations that apply to development at the time of the filing of a permit application. The City has established in this section an administrative procedure for consideration of any claim of a vested right. B. Definitions The following terms shall have the meaning hereinafter ascribed to them under this section: "LGC" means the Texas Local Government Code. "Project" means an endeavor over which the City (a regulatory agency, as defined by LGC Chapter 245) exerts its jurisdiction and for which one or more permits are required to initiate, continue, or complete the endeavor. "Permit" means a license, certificate, approval, registration, consent, permit, contract, or other agreement for construction related to, or provisions of, service from a water or wastewater utility owned, operated, or controlled by the City, or other form of authorization required by law, rule, regulation, order or ordinance that a person must obtain to perform an action or initiate, continue, or complete a Project for which the permit is sought. (i.e. master plan, preliminary plat or final plat) C. Administrative Procedure for Consideration of Claim of Vested Rights Any property owner claiming vested rights under Chapter 245 of the LGC, or other applicable vesting law, shall submit a letter explaining in sufficient detail the basis upon which the property owner is claiming vesting and, consequently, is exempt from or not subject to a particular current regulation, ordinance, rule, expiration date, or other requirement. Such written submission shall include, at a minimum, the following: 1. The name, mailing address, and telephone number of the property owner (or the property owner's duly authorized agent); 2. Identification of the property, including the address (if it exists) and the plat reference (if it exists) or metes and bounds (if not platted), for which the property owner claims a vested right; 3. Provide Project name, type of Permit and date the Permit was filed; 4. If a property owner claims that certain regulations do not apply to the Project, the property owner must identify, with particularity, all requirements that the property owner claims do not apply; and 5. Attach all supporting documents, if any. The letter should be addressed to the Planning and Community Development Department — Planning Division. D. Vested Rights Determination. The Planning Division will review the request and supporting documents and issue a final administrative determination of whether a vested right exists in relation to the Project, and shall identify in writing to the property owner all claims for which vested rights have been granted (the "Vested Rights Determination "). E. Appeal of Vested Right's Determination. If the property owner believes that the Vested Rights Determination is in error, the property owner shall have the right to appeal such Vested Rights Determination to the City Council, which will have jurisdiction to hear and decide the appeal pursuant to the UDC and LGC Chapter 245— Municipal Zoning Authority. F. Recognition of Vested Rights 1. A property owner's original permit application expires on or after the 45th day after the date the application is filed if: a. the property owner fails to provide documents or other information necessary to comply with the City's technical requirements relating to the form and content of the permit application; b. the City provides to the property owner, not later than the I Oth business day after the date the application is filed, written notice of the failure that specifies the necessary documents or other information and the date the application will expire if the documents or other information is not provided; and c. the property owner fails to provide the specified documents or other information within the time provided in the written notice. 2. Basis for Vested Rights Only a Project which was in progress (as defined by LGC Section 245.003) or for which a Permit application was filed after September 1, 1997 may be eligible to claim vested rights; any Project for which the Permit application was filed prior September 1, 1997, or has expired, is not eligible. Vested rights do not begin to accrue until the filing of an original application or Master Development Plan or plat application that gives the City fair notice of the project to which the permit applies and the nature of the permit sought. 3. A Project will expire in five (5 ) years from the date the first Permit application was filed for the Project with City if progress, as defined in LGC Section 245.005, has not been made towards completion of the Project. An expired Project is considered dormant, vested rights lapse and the Project must comply with all current ordinances and requirements. Sec. 21.1.7 Apportionment of Municipal Infrastructure Costs (Rough Proportionality) A. If the City requires as a condition of approval for a property development project that the property owner bear a portion of the costs of municipal infrastructure improvements through dedication of property to the City, the payment of impact fees, the payment of construction costs, or the payment of other infrastructure related costs authorized by applicable law, the property owner's portion of the costs may not generally exceed the amount required for infrastructure improvements that are roughly proportionate to the proposed development as approved by the City Engineer. B. A property owner who disputes the determination made by the City Engineer under Subsection A. above must appeal to the City Council in accordance with UDC, Sec. 21.4.1.4 Appeals, or the City Engineer's determination is final. At the appeal, the property owner may present evidence and testimony under procedures adopted by the City Council. After hearing any testimony and reviewing the evidence, the City Council shall make the applicable determination as to the appeal within thirty (30) days after the final submission of any testimony or evidence by the property owner. C. A property owner may appeal the determination of the City Council to a county or district court of the county in which the development is located within thirty (30) days after the final determination by the City Council. D. The City may not require a property owner to waive the right of appeal authorized by this section as a condition of approval for a development project. Sec. 21.1.8 Violations and Penalties Any person, firm, or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this UDC, or fails to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order or regulation made hereunder, or who shall build any project or facility in violation of any detailed statement of specification or plans submitted and approved hereunder, or any certificate or permit issued hereunder, shall, for each and every violation and noncompliance respectively be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) or the appropriate legal maximum as determined by statute. In the case of a violation of section 21.9.9, the penalty shall be the sum as determined above plus the value of the tree as determined by a certified arborist hired by the City. Each and every day that such violation and/or noncompliance shall exist shall be deemed a separate offense. In case any person, firm, or corporation violates any of the provisions of this UDC or fails to comply therewith, the City, in addition to imposing the penalties above provided may institute any appropriate action or proceedings in court to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use in or about any land, and the definition of any violation of the terms of this UDC as a misdemeanor, shall not preclude the City from invoking the civil remedies given it by law in such cases, but same shall be cumulative of and in addition to the penalties prescribed for such violation. See. 21.1.9 Validity The issuance or granting in error of a permit or approval of plans or plats, site designs, or specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of, a violation of any provision of this UDC or any other City ordinance. No permit purporting to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this UDC shall be valid. Sec. 21.1.10 Development Manual The Development Manual is prepared by the City of Schertz Planning and Community Development Department — Planning Division and is hereby adopted by reference as if set forth in full. The Development Manual shall contain application forms, required application materials, fees, and application submittal deadlines. The Development Manual may be amended by the City Manager or his/her designee from time to time. Sec. 21.1.11 Public Works Specification Manual The Public Works Specification Manual prepared by the City of Schertz Public Works Division is hereby adopted by reference as if set forth in full. The Public Works Specification Manual shall contain specifications necessary to complete public projects. The Public Works Specification Manual may be amended by the City Manager or his /her designee from time to time. End of Article 1 l . £iE�*dEPt�L Pl�i3i�1S1 -�i Article See.-2444—General Provisions Sec. 21.1.1 Short title.-Title Chapter 21 of the City of Schertz Code of Ordinances shall be known and may be cited as the - Unified Development Code of the City of Schertz, Texas or simply as the Unified Development Code or the UDC. ,24 -.�. See. 21A.2 Purpose and intent.-Intent This UDC is adopted to: ,feet protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the City; - L+isufeensure the safe, orderly and efficient development and expansion of the City in accordance with and pursuant to its Comprehensive Land Plan -; and Master Thoroufare Plan; ' . conserve develop, protect and utilize natural resources, in keeping with the public interest; - A- nt revent the overcrowding of land and avoid undue concentration or diffusion of population; —11feteelpmtect and conserve the value of land throughout the City and the value of buildings and improvements upon the land, and to minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings; ide rovide for open space; -At ni iz minimize pollution of air and water, assure the adequacy of drainage facilities, safeguard water resources and _preserve the integrity and aesthetic quality of the community; * lessen congestion in the streets and provide convenient, safe and efficient circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic; and — faeilitatefaflliiate the adequate and efficient provision of transportation, water, wastewater, schools, parks, public safety and recreational facilities, and other public facilities and services. Style Definition: Normal: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition - --- -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition ------------------ Stvle Definition Style Definition ED Style Definition: Iist0 Style Definition: p0 [Style-Definition- : b0 ,, Style Definition: h0 [Style Definition: seclink ( SSttyle Definition: historynote Style Definition: sec �le Definition: Title Style Definition: Subtitle Style Definition: r0 Style Definition: FollowedHyperlink Style Definition: bkmk Style Definition: incr2 Style Definition: content3 — :_: Style Definition: incr0 Style Definition: contentl -------------------- .Style Definition: incrl - - -- - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Style Definition: content2 Style Definition: refnote Style Definition: hg0 Style Definition: incr3 Style Definition: content4 — --------------------------------- -- ------------- ------ - - - --- Style Definition incr4 Style Definition content5 Formatted: Top: 1.38 ", Bottom: 0.88" Formatted Formatted: Normal, Justified --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- --- - - - - -- Formatted Formatted: Normal, Justified f Formatted: List Bullet 3 Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" Seca 21,13Se 2xA-3— Authority This UDC is adopted pursuant to the powers granted to the City and subject to any limitations imposed by the constitution and other laws of the State of Texas and the City Charter. , See-.24- 31— See, 21,1.4 Jurisdiction The provisions of this UDC apply to all property within the corporate limits of the City and gen, &rally ta-- all- lar 'ids si+bje t - -t€3 it-s- jur4sdic#iarl icrthe Extraterritorial Jurisdiction -WD) ,A Jurisdiction within City Limits: indiction within Extraterritorial Jurisdiction- The City extends to its TJ} the regulation of subdivisions and property development adopted under rteea -Gev- , t. L GC Chapter 212.. The City also extends to its ETJ i_ts authority to regulate signage as adopted under LGC c-al- C�ver-rrrl -C , Chapters 216, 245, and 43. T t t ,i , ° srroa'�v � $ i�ziac -v w-IS °rria-�a� +.c -�`y'- °°s -rY°cz ci- °-°acc vvj in its ETJ. within r- : the 11'-'T.1, ti r, tEr in 7 a l; ri,,,;i,a, 1- ,.� -n�I „ ,- +• i +rnn+ of 4and-, 1. Article 1 -- General Provisions 2. Article 3 - Boards and Commissions 3. Article 4 - Procedures and Applications 4, Article 9 - Sec. 21.9 10 Parkland and Open Space Dedication Rec1uirements 5. Article 9 - Sec. 21.0.11 Li htinl and Glare Standards 6. Article l l - Signs and Advertising Devices Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ---- -------- ------------- ---------- 1 Formatted: Body Text - - - - -- - -... — - Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Body Text Formatted: Font: Times New Roman __ --------- — _:_--------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman -- ---------- --- ------------------- -- --------- — - ------- -------------------------------------- Formatted: Body Text, Indent: Left: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman :___ ______—__________________ _______________________________ -; Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman - --- --- ------------ -- - �-- ------------------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto -- - - - - -- -- ----------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ------------------------------------------ ----- ------ -------------------- - Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Body Text, Indent: Left: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" 7, Article 13 Land Distuirmbin Y Activities 8. Article 14 – Trans porta t tion 9. Article 15 – Easements and Utilities 10, Article 16 – Definitions b - - --t . -d - d4r -44r+d-is: adequate-servioes," -ef kia)—OR-GAG-Wu +v- ,"-- ar'21Rc_GGRSt q ade-quate--e,uppty-of -4rink4r4g--watef-. See. 21.1.58ee.--244-.-5.—Consistency with Comprehensive Land Plan— and Master° LT horou X_hfarePlan UDC is intended to implement the mlicies and objectives contained in the Formatted: Normal Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, - + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) See. 21.1 e6 Vested Riahts "Issuance of Local Permits" LGC Chapter 245 – Issuance of Local Permits commonly refeiTed to as the States "Vested R; hts Law" j2Kqyj&s an opportunity for landowners or develot�ers to "grandfather" or "vest" cavemmentreguhqtions that apply t(L d development at the time -- p — -- Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" 'j-'roject" means an endeavor over e h whic the City (a regulatory_q&ncy, defined — - — - — -------- _4Ldpft A b LGC Charaer 245) exerts its jurisdiction and for which one or more oermits are permit is sought, ix. master la!"� mefirnhiaaRlat or final pla _L — p — __ __j) .C.—Administrative Procedure for Con-sid-e-ration-of -Claim of Vested Rights D. Vested Rights Determination. The Plannin2a Division will review the request and su nortima documents and issue a final administrative determination of whether a vested right exists in relation to the Proiect, and shall identify in writim4 to the oroperty-qwner all claims far which vested hts r 1 L tion,71, ig -Pqturn Ram- E Appeal of Vested RSA�,-ht's Determination, If the-pro - erty owner believes that the Vested Rights Determination is in enror, the Dro,oertv owner shall have the right to appeal such Vested Rights Determination to the - -City Council --which will have tsL-i-c-ti-o-- -n -- to --- --h-- -e-a--r - anti- --- d- - e -c---ide - -- the a )eal pursuant to the UDC and LC3C Chapter 245 - Iunicipal2onin -- Authority F. Recognition of Vested 1. A property owner's on Sinai z�ermit adplication expires on or after Elie 45th day after the date themp-lication is filed if: a.th ayooper tyowner fails to provide or other information necessa form and contcnt of the permit Rer-- it anp] i can ow b, the City provides; to the property roerty owner, not later than the 10th business ----- after the date the applic�attan is filedwrittien n pt of the failure that specifies the necessary documents or other information and Elie date the on will expire if the documents or other information is not provided; ; an( c, the property owner fails to provide the specified documents or other information within the time proypleAJ nAh e -wri-H en --notice-, 2, Basis for Vested Rights Only a Project which was inAirogress(ns —deflne-db-y —Wc Section -2-45-00-31 or for which a Permit application was filed af�terSe September 1 _997 maybe eli lible to claim ul -vested- rightsv. -qny-Project for which the Pennit-app imfion was -tiled p L -- -------------- September 1-1997 or has expired is not eligible. Vested rights do not beein to accrue until the filing of an original application or Master Development Plan-or platVp application that the Cit fauLnotic of the 6— - _ -� _w� — notice to which the permit applies and the nature of the permit sought. Formatted: Normal 31, —A-.GrGwth management-. 2, New-devebpmef+t-shoWd-ff4aiRt-aiR --c-hafac4er-,- k-and-feel--of-th,&-G4y. rnorma t 3.35" + 6.69" tted. Tab stops: Not a 3—New-devek)pment-F,hGu4-c4cow-4 -fGr4h&-C+ty7 D, jW4&d4G#GnakaFe-- 4, g afeas-. E—Wstgne pe-,wrv.,bGn-. afea, 3--I)evelopniea"bout d-use-c gmm4,4nit-y-hist4ary F—P&Fk,�,-and-recreation. -1� Qp--Spa- -Ma&t—P4a- 2—. a&soGkAedAmth-Rew-&GhGef,-, 3--Deuek)pm.,t�r�"c sd nic,eurage4pamtenanGe-and -,afety4"arks-and-rec4eation4esGw-Ge� Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" -1 ---------- gwen-promw+e+#-sites-, -so--a&-bq--be - m- rig- ri&qhbe44GGd-s. o pRate-.GhGGkdtstr4c4-, -obtaiRed-3ppfGvakof-any-prGleGt-Gr - -244-x. AA Project eVire five L51X(Lars from ft date the first Permit -get voH_ fined in LGC 'Section 245 -,0 - - 0 - 5-has - not -- been made -- to - war - ds -- ciqWktjgri_of jhtjjpqjKgt Arisn ire -d Proiect is considered donnant, vested rrLhts lapse and the Proiect must comt)lv with all current ordinances and requirements Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Sec. 21.1,7 Apportionment of ip , • tet ° eost Munici al Infrastructure, Costs Mouc'h Proportionality) A. If the uires as a condition of a for a property de project that the aproperty owneln bear a portion of the costs of municipal infrastructure improvements throu r1�1 c cdication of Jro pe to the City the payment of im act, fees, er -jthe payment of construction costs, or the paylncntof other infrastructure related costs authorized by apmlicable law. the nronerty owner's. portion of the costs may not uenerally exceed the amount required for infrastructure improvements that are roughly proportionate to the proposed development as approved by a P€ _ the Cit who disputes the determination made CittJginecr under b&eEta} +PaySlibsection A, above must appeal to the _ City Council in accordance with i71�C Sec. 21.4.14 or the Cty En wn rimay present s evidence ation is f%�At the appeal, the r A_ nd testimony under procedures adopted by the City Council._ After hearing any testimony and reviewing the evidence, the City Council shall make the applicable detenmination as to the appeal within thirty _ -30,1 days after the final submission of any testimony or evidence by the C AA ^ ^ ^ ^rc'rty owney may appeal the determination of the City Council to a county or district court of the county in which the development Jis located within thin 0Jdays after the final determination by the City Council., D. The City may not require a pro ert owner to waive the right of appeal authorized by this section as a condition of approval for a development project., _ Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted. Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto ____ _ _ Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Autto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto — — _ ----------- �'' Forma- - - tt- ed: - -- Font: - - -- Times - - New - -- Roman, - Font color: Auto -- -- — Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto -- - ---- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto _ --- - - - -- - - ° °° ___- _ - -- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman --- --- ------ -------- -------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto ------ --- ---- -- - -- -- --- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto -- ----------------------------- ------------------------------- - - - - - -- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Font color: Auto ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" Any person, firm, or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this UDC,, or fails to- comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order or regulation made hereunder, or who shall build any t?roicct or faciliLin violation of any detailed statement of specification °for plans submitted and approved hereunder, or any certificate or permit issued hereunder, shall, for each and every violation and noncompliance respectively be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be fined a sum not to exceed two thousand dollars ($2,000) or the appropriate legal maximum. as determined b" statute.. In the case of a violation of section 21.9.9, the penalty shall be the sum as determined above plus the value of the tree as determined by a certified arborist hired by the City. Each and every day that such violation and /or noncompliance shall exist shall be deemed a separate offense. In case any person, firm,, or corporation violates any of the provisions of this UDC or fails to comply therewith, the City, in addition to imposing the penalties above provided may institute any appropriate action or proceedings in court to prevent, restrain, correct, or abate or to prevent any illegal act, conduct, business, or use in or about any land, and the definition of any violation of the terms of this UDC as a misdemeanor, shall not preclude the City from invoking the civil remedies given it by law in such cases, but same shall be cumulative of and in addition to the penalties prescribed for such violation. . . 2!.1.12. Sec. 21.1.9 Validity; The issuance or granting in error of a permit or approval of plans or plats, site designs, or specifications shall not be construed to be a permit for, or an approval of,yviolation of any provision of this UDC or any other City ordinance.. No permit purporting to give authority to violate or cancel the provisions of this UDC shall be valid, —e eep a-q�, ° 2 u— vaxrrccr xY. , vX£ i.aai, Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline II? numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + ?' Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Body Text ___ _________________ Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, — + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width) Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" See. 2 1.1.10 DeveloDment Manual 'rhe Development Manual is prepared byIhq City of Schertz Planni Inra C9 unity D reference as if set forth in full. Tice Develot�ment Manual shall contain applicatson forms, re�c aired application lnateraals -fees and application submittal deadlines, The Dowello pn rent Manual May be amended b the Qt Manager or his/her designee from time to time. See. 21.1.11 Public Works SDecification Manual Formatted: Normal, Centered Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Agenda No. 3 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 17 -S -40 — Consideration and/or action on an amendment of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 3 Boards, Commissions and Committees and associated updates in UDC Articles 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14. (Final Reading) Since the first presentation of this item to City Council staff has modified the effective date of Ordinance No. 17 -S -40 to have an effective date for the UDC language amendment to coincide with the Ordinance that will be proposed to create the Building and Standards Commission. The UDC language ordinance is proposed with an effective date of November 30, 2017 and the proposed ordinance creating the Building and Standards Commission will be presented at a November City Council Meeting. As stated in the UDC, City Council from time to time may make amendments, change or modify text to any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. It is generally considered good practice to periodically review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations. Over the last couple of years planning staff has been gathering information, preparing revisions to the UDC and coordinating review of the document with legal counsel. At the beginning of 2017 staff began preparing amendments to Article 3. The proposed amendments provide clarification to the language and include the creation of a new board, the "Building and Standards Commission ". The creation of this commission is intended to provide an appropriate outlet for applicants requesting review of a building code item, appealing a decision of the fire marshal, fire chief, or the building official, and to review and take appropriate actions on buildings found to be in violation of a city ordinance or a public Currently these appeals and reviews in relation to building code and fire code would be heard by the Board of Adjustment. Per Texas Local Government Code Section 211.008 Boards of Adjustment are established to make special exceptions to the terms of the zoning ordinance that are consistent with the general purpose and intent of the ordinance and in accordance with any City Council Memorandum Page 2 applicable rules contained in the ordinance. In other words, the Board of Adjustment is to only hear items in relation to the zoning ordinance and zoning related items. With the creation of the Building and Standards Commission items that are in relation to building and fire code, not relating to zoning, will be heard by a commission that is given the authority to do so by Texas Local Government Code Chapter 54. Additionally, while reviewing the creation of the Building and Standards Commission all items previously heard by the Board of Adjustment were reviewed and items that are not true zoning items or decisions related to zoning are being amended to be heard by a more appropriate board or commission. This review process and proposed changes was completed to ensure that the most appropriate board or commission will be hearing each item as each commission or board is provided to do so by Local Government Code. Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of October 10, 2017. . • Text amendments were made to Article 3 in order to provide consistency with the City Charter and with each Board, Committee and Commissions by -laws. • Minor text amendments have been made to correct the title of Transportation Safety Advisory Commission (TSAC). • Text amendments have been made to Section 21.3.3 to clarify the Commission's approval authority of an amending and minor plat. • Text amendments have been made to Section 21.3.3 to add authority to make final determinations relating to appeals on certain staff decisions. • Text amendments to Section 21.3.4 Board of Adjustment to clarify that Board of Adjustment is to only hear cases in relation to zoning and zoning related decisions. • Text amendments have been made to Section 21.3.5 Administrative Authority to clarify the review and recommendation authority. • Text amendments to Section 21.3.6 Other Boards, Commissions and Committees to create a new commission, the Building and Standards Commission. • Text amendments to the following sections to alter the deciding board or commission: • Section 21.4.16.C.3 text amendment to change "Director of Development Services" to "City Manager" also to change "BOA" to "the Building and Standards Commission ". • Section 21.8.4.B.10 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". • Section 21.8.4.C.3.0 text amendment to change "Director of Development Services" to "City Manager" also to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". • Section 21.8.4.C.3.D text amendment to change "Director of Development Services" to "City Manager" also to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". • Section 21.8.4.C.3.E.i text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". • Section 21.9.9.C.1 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". City Council Memorandum Page 3 o Section 21.9.9.C.2 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.9.12.17 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.11.3.G text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.11.4.7 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.11.7.I text amendment to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.11.22.D.3c text amendment to change "BOA" to "Building and Standards Commission ". o Section 21.11.22.D.3.d text amendment to change "BOA" to "Building and Standards Commission ". o Section 21.11.22.D.4 text amendment to change "BOA" to "Building and Standards Commission ". o Section 21.14.3.1) text amendment to change "variance" to "waiver" and to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.14.3.E text amendment to change "variance" to "waiver" and to change "BOA" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". o Section 21.14.5.0 text amendment to change "Board of Adjustment" to "Planning and Zoning Commission ". Goal To amend the UDC due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations as well as establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Review and approve Ordinance 1.7 -S -40 amending the UDC, Article 3 Boards, Commissions and Committees and associated updates in UDC Articles 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on September 13, 2017 and offered a unanimous recommendation of approval. City Council Memorandum Page 4 Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -5 -40 an amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 3 — Boards, Commissions and Committees and associated updates in UDC Articles 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14 as presented. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 17 -5 -40 UDC Article 3 Boards, Commission and Committees — Red Lines ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -S -40 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 3 BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND COMMITTEES AND ASSOCIATED UPDATES IN UDC ARTICLES 4, 8, 9, 11 & 14; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10 -S -06, the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") adopted as Amended and Restated Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the "Current UDC "); and WHEREAS, City Staff and has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revision and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; WHEREAS, on September 13, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and thereafter recommended approval; and WHEREAS, on October 1.0, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and in the interest of the public safety, health and welfare; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of November 30, 2017 and any publication required by law. Approved on first reading the l Ott' day of October, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 24th day of October, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) o l • Unified Development Code Article 3 Boards, Commissions and Committees '_ Unified Development Code Articles 4, 8, 9, 11, 14 See Attached Article 3 Boards, Commissions and Committees Sec. 21.1.1 General Provisions A. Source of Authority Authority under this UDC shall be vested in and delegated to the officials and decision - makers designated in this Article 3, under the City Charter, the Constitution and other laws of the State and the City's Code of Ordinances. This authority shall be deemed supplemental to any other authority lawfully conferred upon the officials and decision - makers. The omission of a citation in this UDC to any authority conferred upon the officials and decision - makers under the City Charter, the Constitution or other laws of the State or the Code or Ordinances shall not be construed as limiting the actions of such officials and decision - makers taken in accordance with and in reliance upon such authority. B. Authority Granted The City Council, Planning and Zoning Commission, Board of Adjustment, Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Historic Preservation Committee, Transportation Safety Advisory Commission and Building and Standards Commission have the powers and authority as granted by State law, the City Charter and the Code of Ordinances to initiate, undertake, and decide matters as identified in this UDC. Sec. 21.1.2 Citv Council A. Duties and Approval Authority in addition to other rights of approval, the City Council shall render final decisions pertaining to applications for development on the following applications: 1. amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan; 2. establish or amend a zoning district map classification, including creation . or amendment of an overlay district; 3. amendment to the UDC; 4. annexation; 5. a Development Agreement within the City's corporate boundaries and in the City's ETJ; 6. rezoning requests including applications for a Specific Use Permit; 7. Historic Landmark or District Designation; 8. an a appeal of a vested rights determination; and 9. an appeal of the decision of any City Board, Commission or Committee, except the Board of Adjustment and Building and Standards Commission or as expressly provided for in this UDC or the Local Government Code. Sec. 21.1.3 Planning and Zoning Commission A. Structure of the Commission The Planning and Zoning Commission is established in accordance with the City Charter and Commission members are appointed by the City Council. B. Duties and Approval Authority 1. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to review and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following applications: a. amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan; b. establish or amend a zoning district map classification, including creation or amendment of an overlay district; C. rezoning requests including an application for a Specific Use Permit. d. amendment to the UDC; and e. a Development Agreement as set forth in the LGC and this UDC; 2. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have final approval authority on the following applications: a. Subdivision Master Plan. b. preliminary plat; C. final plat; d. amending plat; if forwarded by the City Manager or his/her designee. e. minor plat; if forwarded by the City Manager or his /her designee. f. replat; and g. waivers relating to Article 12, Subdivisions. 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have the authority to make final determinations relating to appeals of staff determinations on the following items: a. Required Conditions for Home Occupations and denial of a Home Occupation permit. b. Site Design Standards including Tree Preservation & Mitigation, Revisions to Approved Site Plans. C. Signs & Advertising Devices including general requirements, removal of signs. d. Additional Design Requirements including off street parking, building setback lines, and landscape buffers. e. An appeal of a driveway waiver determination. Sec. 21.1.4 Board of Adjustment A. Structure and Procedure of the Board of Adjustment 1. Composition and Procedures a. The Board of Adjustment (BOA) is established in accordance with the City Charter and provision of Chapter 21.1 of the Texas Local Government Code (LGC). The Board members are appointed by the City Council. Each case before the BOA must be heard by at least 75 percent of the members. 2. Vote Required for Decisions a. The concurring vote of four (4) of the five (5) members of the BOA is necessary to: i. reverse an order, requirement, decision or determination of an administrative official; or ii. authorize a variation from the terms of a zoning regulation. B. Duties and Approval Authority The BOA shall have the following duties: The BOA shall hear and decide appeals when error is alleged in any order, requirement, decision or determination made by an administrative official of the City in the enforcement of this UDC or an ordinance, with respect to zoning and zoning related decisions. a. The BOA may reverse or affirm, in whole or in part, or modify the administrative official's order, requirement, decision, or determination from which an appeal is taken and make the correct order, requirement, decision, or determination, and for that purpose the BOA has the same authority as the administrative official. 2. The BOA may authorize, in specific cases, a variance from this UDC in relation to zoning related items, unless specified otherwise, if the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of this UDC or an ordinance adopted hereunder would result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of this UDC or an ordinance adopted hereunder is observed and substantial justice is done. A variance shall not be granted to relieve a self - created or personal hardship, nor shall it be based solely on economic gain or loss, nor shall it permit any person a privilege in developing a parcel of land not permitted by this UDC to other parcels of land in the district. In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of this UDC, the BOA must determine the following: a. the requested variance does not violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; b. special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; the hardship is in no way the result of the applicant's own actions; or d. the interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. See. 21.1.5 Administrative Authority A. Authority Granted The City Manager or his /her designees shall have such powers and authority as granted by State law, the City Charter, the Code of Ordinances, and this UDC to initiate, undertake, and decide any matters pertaining to the regulation of the use and development of land as identified in this UDC and are authorized to take all actions necessary to carry out their responsibilities in accordance with the requirements and limitations prescribed therein. B. Administrative Structure The City Manager is designated as the chief administrative official of the City. The City Manager, at his /her discretion, may designate the director of any department or other employee as the administrative authority responsible for consideration of any item deemed appropriate by the City Manager. C. Duties and Approval Authority 1. The City Manager or his /her designee shall have the authority to review and make a recommendation to the appropriate approval body on the following applications: a. amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan; b. establish or amend a zoning district map classification, including creation or amendment of an overlay district; C. rezoning requests including an applications for a Specific Use Permit; d. amendment of this UDC; C. annexation; f. a Development Agreement within the City's corporate boundaries and in the City's ETJ; g. Historic Landmark or District Designation; h. an appeal of the decision of any City Board, Commission, Committee or staff as authorized by this UDC; i. Subdivision Master Plan; j. preliminary plat; k. final plat; 1. replat; m. a variance, appeal or other application to be considered by the BOA; n. an interpretation, appeal or other application to be considered by the Building and Standards Commission; and o. an interpretation, waiver, appeal or other application to be considered by the Planning & Zoning Commission. 2. The City Manager or his /her designee shall have final approval authority on the following applications: a. a minor plat, as authorized by this UDC and LGC Section 212.0065. However, the City Manager or his /her designee may forward the plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval; b. an amending plat, as authorized by this UDC, and LGC Section 21.2.0065. However, the City Manager or his/her designee may forward the plat to the Planning and Zoning Commission for approval; C. a Certificate of Determination, as authorized by this UDC and LGC Section 21.2.0115. However, the City Manager or his /her designee may forward the request to the Planning and Zoning Commission for determination; d. a site plan; and C. other applications as authorized by this UDC. Sec. 21.1.6 Other Boards, Commissions and Committees A. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board 1. Structure of the Parks Board The structure of the Parks Board shall be as set forth by the City Council in establishing the Parks Board. 2. Duties and Approval Authority The Parks Board shall serve as an advisory board to the City Council and may review and make recommendations on the following matters: a. parks and recreation improvements and amenities included with any parkland dedication; and b. creation, amendment or updates to the Parks and Open Space Master Plan of the City. B. Historic Preservation Committee 1. Structure of the Historic Committee The structure of the Historic Committee shall be as set forth by the City Council in establishing the Historic Committee. 2. Duties and Approval Authority The Historic Committee shall have those duties and approval authority as set forth by the City Council in establishing the Historic Committee. C. Transportation Safety Advisory Commission 1. Structure of the Transportation. Safety Advisory Commission (TSAC) The structure of the TSAC shall be as set forth by the City Council in establishing the TSAC. 2. Duties and Approval Authority The TSAC shall serve as an advisory commission to the City Council and is established to investigate safety issues and make recommendations with respect to City roadways and to improve the City's quality of life through a citizen /government partnership that promotes safe and secure roads, which provide convenience, recreational and leisure activities and continued beautification of the City. The duties of the TSAC may include, but are not limited to, the following duties: a. coordinate and communicate with the various Boards, Commissions, Committees and the City Council on matters related to transportation safety; b. develop safety materials to be used for promotional activities; C. develop research materials needed for promotion of transportation safety; d. develop a transportation safety plan for the City; e. review proposed transportation and traffic ordinances and make recommendations to the City Council; and f. participate in fact finding trips, conferences, and seminars related to transportation and traffic safety. D. Buildings and Standards Commission I . Structure and Procedure of the Building and Standards Commission Composition and Procedures: a. The Building and Standards Commission is established in accordance with the provision of Chapter 54 of the LGC. Each case before the Building and Standards Commission must be heard by a majority of the members. b. The City Council will appoint a commission comprised of five (5) members and two (2) alternates who are residents of the City, one from each of the following professions or disciplines: i. Registered design professional with architectural experience or a builder or superintendent of building construction; ii. Registered design professional with structural engineering experiences; iii. Registered design professional with mechanical and plumbing engineering experience or a mechanical contractor or plumbing contractor; iv. Registered design professional with electrical engineering experience or an electrical contractor; and V. Registered design professional with fire protection engineering experience or a fire protection contractor. C. Registered Design Professional is defined as an individual who is registered or licensed to practice their respective design profession as defined by the statutory requirements of the professional registration laws of the state of Texas. d. If a resident with the above criteria cannot be found then the City Council may appoint another resident of their choosing to the Commission. 2. Duties and Approval Authority The Building and Standards Commission shall have the following duties: a. The Building and Standards Commission has the authority to enforce the enumerated health and safety ordinances as authorized by Chapter 54 LGC, subchapter C, as amended. Specifically the Commission hears cases relative to ordinance violations: i. for the preservation of public safety, relating to the materials or methods used to construct a building of improvement, including the foundation, structural elements, electrical wiring or apparatus, plumbing and fixtures, entrances, or exits; ii. relating to the fire safety of a building or improvement, including provisions relating to materials, types of construction or design, warning devices, sprinklers or other fire suppression devices, availability of water supply for extinguishing fires, or location design, or width of entrances or exits; iii. relating to dangerously damaged or deteriorated building or improvements; iv. relating to conditions caused by accumulations of refuse, vegetation, or other matter that creates breeding and living places for insects and rodents; and V. relating to a building code or to the condition, use, or appearance of property in the City of Schertz. b. The Building and Standards Commission shall have the authority to do the following items per LGC Sec. 54.036 i. order the repair, within a fixed period, of buildings found to be in violation of an ordinance; ii. require the demolition of a structure found to be a public nuisance; iii. declare a building substandard in accordance with the powers granted by LGC Chapter 54 Subsection C; iv. order, in an appropriate case, the immediate removal of persons or property found on private property, enter on private property to secure the removal if it is determined that conditions exist on the property that constitute a violation of an ordinance, and order action to be taken as necessary to remedy, alleviate, or remove any substandard building found to exist; V. issue orders or directives to any peace office or the state, including a sheriff or constable or the chief of police in the City of Schertz, to enforce and carry out the lawful orders or directives of the commission; and vi. determine the amount and duration of the civil penalty the municipality may recover as provided by LGC Section 54.01.7. C. The Building and Standards Commission has the authority to hear appeals to a decision from the fire chief, fire marshal, or the building official related i. the use of alternate materials and construction methods; or ii. interpretations of the fire code or building codes as adopted by the City of Schertz, including but not limited to, granting exceptions to those codes in order to make a reasonable accommodation for a disabled person or group as defined by the Fair Housing Amendment Act. d. The Building and Standards Commission has the authority to make a determination as to whether an alternative construction material or construction method equally meets the applicable code's standards, especially considering the alternative's adequacy, stability, strength, sanitation, and safety for the public's health and welfare. Any request to use an alternative construction material or construction method may be approved by the commission if and only if the commission determines that the alternative construction material or construction method equally meets the applicable codes and standards especially considering the alternative's adequacy, stability, strength, sanitation and safety for the public's health and welfare. Fagade materials are exempt from this section. C. The Building and Standards Commission has the authority to reverse a decision of the fire chief, fire marshal or the building official only by concurring vote of at least four commission members. f. The Building and Standards Commission also has the following responsibilities: i. to evaluate proposed amendments to the fire and building codes, and make recommendations to the City Council regarding such amendments; ii. to hear from any person requesting a change to the fire and building codes as adopted by the city; to act as an advisor to the Fire Chief, Building Official; and iv. to manage any additional duties, powers, and responsibilities assigned by the City Council in compliance with the City Charter and laws of the State of Texas. End of Article 3 Associated UDC Sections with Amendments Sec. 21.4.16.C.3 3. Appeals. Any person or persons aggrieved by any decision of the City Manager or his /her designee, or any taxpayer or any officer, department, or board of the City may appeal the decision of the City Manager or his /her designee to the Building and Standards Commission. Sec. 21.8.4.B.10 10. A home occupation shall produce no offensive noise, vibration, smoke, electrical interferences, dust, odors, or heat detectable beyond the property limits or beyond the walls of the dwelling unit. The judgment of the City's Code Enforcement Officer pertaining to a violation under this section shall be considered decisive and final unless formally appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission within thirty (30) days after the Code Enforcement Officer's written determination. Sec. 21.8.4.C.3.0 c. The decision of the City Manager or his/her designee may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with section 21.4.14. Sec. 21.8.4.C.3D d. The Planning and Zoning Commission will be the final judgment on appeals which must be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission within thirty (30) days after disapproval by the City Manager or his/her designee. 21.8.4.C.3.E.i i. Signed statement. One type of supporting evidence that may be submitted to the Planning and Zoning Commission for their consideration of an appeal is a signed statement by each property owner up to 200 feet of the property on which the home occupation is to occur, stating that the property owner has no objection to the existence of the proposed home occupation. An example of such a statement is as follows: "I (name) the property owner at (address) have been advised by (name of home occupation applicant) of the request to the City for a Home Occupation Permit for the purpose of conducting (type of home occupation) and I have no objection to the home occupation permit being granted for the purpose reflected in this statement. Signature of neighboring property owner and date" 21.9.9.C.1. 1. Protected Trees. Any Protected Trees not exempt from preservation in section B.3. above may be removed upon approval of a Tree Removal Permit by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services Any decision of the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services regarding a tree removal permit may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with section 21.4.14 of this UDC. 21.9.9.C.2 2. Heritage Trees. Any Heritage Trees to be removed may be removed upon approval of a Tree Removal Permit by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services. Any decision by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services regarding a tree removal permit may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with section 21.4.1.4 of this UDC. All Heritage Trees shall be required to meet the mitigation requirements of this section. 21.9.12.F F. Revisions to Approved Site Plan. Changes to an approved Site Plan shall be processed in the same manner as the original approved Site Plan; however, changes of details within a Site Plan which do not alter the basic physical relationship of the property to adjacent property, do not alter the use permitted, increase the density, floor area, height, or reduce the yards provided at the boundary of the site as indicated on the approved Site Plan, may be authorized by the City Manager or his /her designee. An aggrieved party may appeal the decision of the City Manager or his/her designee to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with the provisions of this UDC. 21.11.3.G G. Liability. The City Manager or his /her designee, members of the Planning and Zoning Commission, or other City employees charged with the enforcement of this Article, while acting for the City in good faith and without malice in the discharge of the duties required by this Article or other pertinent laws, ordinances, codes or regulations shall not be rendered liable personally and are hereby relieved of personal liability for any damage accruing to persons or property as a result of any act or by reason of an act or omission in the discharge of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officer or employee in the lawful discharge of duties and under the provisions of this Article shall be defended by a legal representative of the City until the final termination of the proceedings. No City official shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit, or proceeding that is instituted in pursuance of the provisions of this Article writing along with the established filing fee to the Planning and Zoning Commission within ten (10) days after the date of denial or revocation. 21.1.1.7.1 I. Appeal. Any decision rendered by the City Manager or his /her designee or other City personnel in the enforcement of this Article may be appealed to the Planning and Zoning Commission by any person, agent, or representative affected by such decision. Such appeal must be in writing and received within ten (10) days after a decision rendered along with the established fee. 21.11.22.D.3.c c. The licensee may appeal a suspension decision to the Building and Standards Commission by filing a written request within ten (10) days after receiving notice of the suspension. The Building and Standards Commission shall hold a hearing to determine whether the suspension decision should be sustained or reversed. 21.1.1.22.D.3d d. If a licensee's license has been suspended twice in a three (3) year period, and the licensee then commits another violation under this Article or other laws, ordinances, codes and regulations applicable hereto, the City Manager or his /her designee shall notify the Building and Standards Commission. The Building and Standards Commission shall then hold a hearing to consider cancellation of the license. 21.11.22.D.4 4. Appeal. A person, whose license has been denied or revoked, may appeal in writing along with the filing fee then in effect to the Building and Standards Commission within ten (10) days. 2L14.3.D D. Off - Street Parking. Off street parking is permitted adjacent to the landscape buffer along the right -of -way. Parking and vehicular use areas adjacent to the right -of -way shall have land berm walls or a vegetative hedge barrier to reduce vehicular reflections to the right -of. -way. A waiver may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission which would allow a reduction in the minimum required landscape buffer when off - street parking is located entirely along the side or rear of the building or lot. 21.14.3.E E. Building Setback Line. A minimum fifty foot (50') building setback shall be required adjacent to all rights -of -way. A waiver may be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission which would allow for a reduction in the minimum required setback when an alternative site layout and design provides for additional open space or landscaping and off - street parking will be located entirely at the rear of the building or lot. In no case shall the minimum building setback be reduced less than the minimum required setback for the applicable zoning district in accordance with Article 5. 21.1.4.5.0 C. Waivers. Where the City Manager or his /her designee finds that extraordinary hardship may result from strict compliance with the regulations prescribed in this Article, the City Manager or his /her designee may vary the regulations so that substantial justice may be done and the public interest secured, provided that such waiver will not have the effect of nullifying the intent and purpose of this Article. In granting waivers and modifications, the City Manager or his /her designee may require such conditions as will, in his/her judgment, secure substantially the objective of the standards or requirements so varied or modified. In the event the City Manager or his/her designee should disapprove a request for a waiver, the applicant may request an appeal to the Planning and Zoning Commission. see.4i-.3-.4­—Arflde 3 Boards- Commissions and Committees See. 21.1.1 General pmvis­iom�-Provisions of under this UDC shall ho vested in and delegated m the officials and designated in this Article 3, under the City Charter, the Constitution and other laws of the State and the GAyL,%Cijy: _s Code of Ordinances., This authority shall be deemed supplemental to any other authority lawfully cnu1ined upon the oD]ciu\x and decision-makers. _The vrui*ainu of citation in this UDC to any authority conferred upon the officials and decision-makers under the City Charter, the Constitution n, other laws vfthe State m the Code vr Ordinances shall not he construed uolimiting the actions of such officials and decision-makers taken bz accordance with and io reliance upon such authority. ^ Style Definition: Normal: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Style Definition: Heading 1: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Centered, Space Before: 0 pt, Line spacing: single, Don't keep lines together I Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition: pO Style Definition: bO Style Definition: historynote Style Definition: sec [Style Definition; rO (Style Definition- bkmk Style Definition: content3 Style Definition: incrO Style Definition: contentl Style Definition: incrI Style Definition: content2 Style Definition: refn ote Style Definition- hgO F0 r matted Formatted LFormatted. Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman J LFormatted: Font: Times New Roman rl'Ormatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35 + 6.69 Formatted: Font: Not Italic 9eo HPA D—C t- in -At# y, 't1+a f- t�ea€�sas €e?rr+e� evr;r -orte {1�- c>r -rnor r -t . L�E3 - re- ire -appar , t-e - yet; bet n -a -ge rat- pre�r+ -n- a- epee +fiG- pr�t�ie � artd -fie -- - kleF- i>r- irr�c� labic, -- floe -s i #ic 2.tic�raie a� wet a sp^ sn ^�,sta'r urc �r�,.� TTr, +Formatted: Normal, Centered - srtelr standard �ha}I he �ttppl ��nrt�d by :�t�y g�t�Fal at -�fae pr�vis of 71�t� I} ', �'od� Formatted Font: Bold G a..� —.�. Citj��.n�tl•: Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto I he Crty Council, F'la'nnin and honing C€}ai31111SSlOn, Hoard Of Adatistnlent, I'arkS and Recreation- Formatted: Normal, Justified Advisory Board Historic Preservation Committee franspottation Safet�visory Cammission – aild Building and Standards Commission have the powers and authority as granted by State law aial hcm ale c%ties, the City Charter and the Code of Ordinances9 to initiate, undertake, r + sA, t +' �C +i, i `7 7 �+f tu,„ and decide smatters 1;�;,°n�.�- �:,- r�g:°� mn ���,�- x; =���se as identified in this UDC. and Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto In addition to other rights of approval, the City Council shall render final- Formatted: Bt3 a� al' i decisioixs taertaini to applications for development on the following applications: Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" to the Land 2. establish or amend a-zanin diArLic A nuip classification, including creation or. amendment of an overlay district; the pp4iea#( R4G- 37� 6,--Aa-app4Ga#o+i- far —iWeva€-of-a--GGrwyeptual-p�ar+-as-par4-4Df-a-P4aR4ied-Dev-etGpmeRt-)istriet; 7— AR -app kGaten-k)il-a-SpaG4f4GJ-Lsa-Rwn�Ht, 5. a Development Agreement within )orate boundaries and in the 44y4Cjt_yjs_ ETJ; 6. rezonin requests includi-o- applications for a Specific Use Permit, ric Landmark or District DeF AFC _ETJ-,'ar4d T 8. an a anneal of a vested decision of or 6� the Local Government Code. See. 21.1.3 Sev —.Planning and Zoning Commission: ME snd _Standards Commission )rovided for in this UDC or A,_Struc old the CorarnissionA. Authee;ty'&4� The Planning and Zoning Commission -granted -by-State law, the •pertaa,un df4and-aa4dent&,,.-i +a, established a Naffning accordance with the City Charter and Commission Con �," haI143e-Lmnenibbers are appointed by the City Council. Pit r' v� Nfeetin s of lllaraning and Boni +3�o }rlrrl +ss+on may b� held at the call the Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: - - - ... . -1-11 at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" ------------------------- ----- — ----- --------- — ------------ Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto - - — ----------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ...................................... ---------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Auto tt�� Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto ----- - --- - -------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman --------------------- ----------------------------- Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ............................................. Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" — ------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto ----------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - ----- -- - - - - -- -- -- --- q F orma t e d Font: Times N ew Roman, No t I ta lic , F o nt color: Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman --------------------------------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, 12 pt Formatted F9 - - -------------------- - - - - -- -------- - - - -_ Formatted Formatted Formatted ------------------------------------------ Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted Formatted r___ Formatted: Btl Formatted: Font: Not Italic Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" M determiff and and Zoning Commission shall have the authorit review and make a recommendation to the City Council on the following applications:, a. a, An��- �amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan; b---Ar+-app4Ga4e-n-for- amen draem including an application for a Specific Use Permit. d, 2-amendment to the UD , an e, a Development Agreement as set forth in the LGC and this UD The Planning and Zoning Commission shall have final on the following applications:. g—An-awk n-for - - Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at. r ----- - ----- - -- ------------------------------------------------ Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ...................................... ==-==�_=-x- - ------------------------------------- - Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color. Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman . .. . .............. . ........ ..... ........ - -- - - - - - ------- - ------ ------- Level: - 5 ---------------- Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + e e + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: I H I eading - 5, Outline numbered + Level, 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, - + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at 2" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color Auto Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, - + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman --- -------- - - - -- ------------ - -------------- Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + eve + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" 3. 3—The Planning and Zoning Commission shall 4he-C-Ay -have the authority to make final tin to appeals of staff determinations on the followi ng items. - Sec. 21.1.4 See--24-34.—Board of Adjustments -A7-----A+�44eF4y-gFGpte4,-StructLire and Procedure of the Board of Aditistm-ent L C 0,01 --- --nposition and Procedures The Board of Adjustment (BOA) shafl-ha-ve-&uGh-pGwers-qnd--authGF4-as-granted-by-State- law,-4he-is established in accordance with the City Charter ,-4 antes,-and -t#ls-UDC4e-4n4i. , xlen#fied4n-thts�, IMMINEMIUM the BOA, a, 1. Ica o—n-e' ° Texas Lo cal G overnment C ode fLGQ. The POA-,hgl-consist-of4ve-(54Board members wl+a-shaU Beare appointed by the City Council. Each ffworbefn a +zn "-hag before the BOA must be heard by at least 75 percent of the members, a. 'rhe concurrin2 vote of four (4) of the five (5) members of the BOA-, nate-130A members is is necessary to s€ the-abseaee.�e: i, reverse an order reciuirement _decision or determination of an administrative official or Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: I + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5' + Indent at: 0", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width), Tab stops: Not at 0.5" Formatted: Font: Not Italic Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" ii. authorize a variation from the terms of a zoninare�alation. The BOA. shall .inted fofhave the followm duties: Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt3 I The BOA may reverse or affirm, in whole or in part, or modify the- Formatted: Heading 5, outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, .. + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + administrative official's order, requirement, decision, or Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" determination from which an appeal is taken and make the correct order, requirement, decision, or determination, and for that purpose the BOA has the same authority as the administrative official. 4R4aver -�p 4Gant-Gn-a-mafte�on-whtG he--B &-r-quifed4G -p e... -andeiL- .°`., -1 - ------ The-€GA -- shall- ar- -d- e- is -whei- error-- -+s-alleged- +n-- ;reorder,- sir gat t3ecisirl++ aa�- ardiva - -� ted- der- tk+is- dtC3�: Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" 2. The BOA in specific cases, a variance from this UDC- in relation to zonirelated items unless specified otherwise, if the variance is not contrary to the public interest and, due to special conditions, a literal enforcement of this UDC or an ordinance adopted hereunder would result in unnecessary hardship, and so that the spirit of this UDC or an ordinance adopted hereunder is observed and substantial justice is done. A variance shall not be granted to relieve a self - created or personal hardship, nor shall it be based solely on economic gain or loss, nor shall it permit any person a privilege in developing a parcel of land not permitted by this UDC to other parcels of land in the district. Jn order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of this UDC, the BOA must determine the following:, a. Thethe requested variance does not violate the intent of this, UDC or its amendments; b. b Spee4alsT-ecial conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; C, e T -hethe hardship is in no way the result of the appliV 's own actions; or d. d. Tbethe interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. 3 The -RQA4 4- tear- and -- desk - ttrer- matters -as -aWhGrized -by- he-C4y nGP- and - deemed Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto __ __ J Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: (! Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" M Or-StFL4ctire-,hal en-Mtl+4ue4egaF44aF-thL-prGperAy -FW-s-,of-#ve-per-sGR&-aff-eGted-N#eo GGRsgeFed4n4ight-o4he-pubUG-welfaFe-and4he-GharaGter-o��frGu,qding4he-des4gnated nonGop,fGnRmg4�&e-and4he--GnsE�wafiop-and-pr&sepor���pe#y-T4&-BOA-niay�frem4n�Re to- P-- W-� -b -t-e &W d- PfGP -4 }—S-,-6Rq—,#G Formatted: Font: Not Italic 1, of 4—Hearing-and-testiri4o4y. #-at-the that-4e-stlmony--i6 rvecessafy for 444e P-P-A+SP--MG-Gf th--atte-t- 'd shal�-ma4e4t&4eG4&iG. LFormatted: Nor-,,I 6C Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Sees . Authoriiv A. Authority Granted- E° The City Manager or his /her designees shall have such powers and authority as granted by State law, the City Charter, the Code of Ordinances, and this UDC to initiate, undertake, and decide any matters pertaining to the regulation of the use and development of land as identified in this UDC and are authorized to take all actions necessary to carry out their responsibilities in accordance with the requirements and limitations prescribed therein. inistrative Structure- The City Manager is designated as the chief administrative official of the City._ The City Manager, at his/her discretion, may designate the director of any department or other employee as the administrative authority responsible for consideration of any item deemed appropriate by the City Manager. C. C- Duties and Approval Authorit 1. The City Manager or his /her designee shall have the authority to review and make a recommendation to the 1e+ Vriate approval body, on the following applications:, a. a. "tn din —for— amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan; establish or amend. a zon!n district_,rr a c! assification .,.. including _creation. or amendment of an overlay district - b. rezonin re nests includirsq an a��lications „ d An a�� lication to establish e r, r h' N r Y "A"m' for a Specific Use Permit; d. h. An applis amendment of this UDC• e. annexatian, f. a Development Agreement within the "` 'City "s corpo_ boundaries and in the isCit� s ETJ; Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + !! Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width), Tab stops: Not at 0.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color Auto Formatted: Bt3 Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt3 Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto -------- _ ---------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + i+ Indent at; 1.5" . Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman �! Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + '! Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + fr Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" ^ 3 l+ea #I Xt E +t -ks#+SIt+eS- #43 land- Ideated ity E -T-J> I Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" lIisto,ric La?ndmarlc oI District Desigjyl on; an appeal of the decision of any City Board, Commission, Committee or staff as authorized by this UDC; i. .1I fora Subdivision Master Flan; 1. ^ i- app4ee4t&n- fef-a- preliminary plat; apphe, r' final plat; tat; 1. i . A*-ipphU replat; The City Manager or his/her designee shall have final approval authority on the following applications: a. a i-applic � a minor plat, as authorized by this UDC and Loel -d��-- ' G - Sectior1212.0065 However, he City Manager or his,'her designee maY forward the plat to the Flannin,� and 7onin:; Comsliission for ap rp oval; b. b. a Ica€or an amending plat, as authorized by this UDC, and Leenom r r rnm r �-e-4t,CC Section 212.0065. However, the City Manaaer or his /her designee may forward the Hat to the P annl nd Zogin� Commission for approval; pplicat on -far -a -' -laa -d C . d0thera Certificate of Determination, as authorized by this UDC and LCC Section 212_0115, 1- 1owev_erthe City aver c)r his /her desianec may forward the request to the Flannia and Commission for deteiminatioi> z Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, — + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: (f; Auto Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" +Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5" - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman ----------------------------------------------- Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numb�at: el: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: ent: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + In d. a site Zan; and Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" e. other applications as authorized by this UDC. pr+J ad- - t-e- Berard,- -- issi( r+ -(, - of -Git}£ ei9- €cr-re . , See. 21A.6Se 4.3 Other Boards, Commissions and Committeesn Parks and Recreation Advisory Board- ##$/ fj imp. u^ zv v.,^ v,rimy C n {P- k— rt..ew- d)- 4a-bee -- ated -by t £its} r+eil - -T - Paris -- ar€1- � 1-- lsave- soaks -- - a+Jtfa€�raiy -as- €rasa# - -- �r (3rdi cos+ -a k# - - tca- in+t +ste, u�adartal�e, axed- rsnake r - - a I 's..ct€- a- rtters of the Parks Board, The structure of the Parks Board shall be as set forth by the City Council in the-establishing the Parks Board-of-by y depley 4iruetur -e - -a -' ~tien --th 2. Duties and Approval Author The Parks Board shall serve as an advisory board to the City Council may review and make recommendations on the following matters: ac�L+i #ability- a#- parktarld dedieat+cr,; inel>ad+ rag - #e€>- ifs- d+eti- sa#- e�asasidc�ratia� a. and recreation improvements and included with any parkland dedication; and b. e. C,.a°" ^creation, amendment or updates to the Parks and Open Space Master Plan of the City. Preservation Committee7 4— ._Ar+tl�rf €y -a tact- Ar+- H+stcric -1?r ova #ors- - - i #tee {k4sieric - - rsanast #ee } -1} - lsaencra d -by Or+dirsarsees- and- t€+is- - to - -ini# +ate,- -- undertake= ate- €make -r , s} iorss- ar+- a+a� -sx�a €tars pertaining-4c) t# --r r+--a€-- 4 , -€+sc o#-- o -b s --a siructurres--<at kaast s4g€ +„ 1, --- - - - - -- -Structure of the Historic Committee- s The structure of the Historic Committee shall be as set forth by the City Council in establishing the Historic Committee �y—ru1e^ a *d regulat+ons- adopted by t €%i'rtr+lie C- omn�itt+�e aaot in conic -i �mzitll -tlle amity Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 2, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 2 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0" + Tab after: 0.5" + Indent at: 0 ", Keep lines together, Border: Bottom: (Single solid line, Auto, 0.5 pt Line width), Tab stops: Not at 0.5" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt4 Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt4 Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5 + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: j Auto Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt4 Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" and The Historic Committee shall have those duties and approval authority set forth by the City Council in establishing the Historic Committee. ?row Transf?ortation Safety Advisory Commission- Advisory Commission (TSAC) and The TSAC shall serve as an advisory commission to the City Council and is established to investigate safety issues and make recommendations with respect to City roadways and to improve the Oty!sCi 's quality of life through a citizen/government partnership that promotes safe and secure roads, which provide convenience, recreational and leisure activities and continued beautification of the City. The duties of the TSAC afe-e4ablished eAC �may include, but are not limited to, the following duties: a. a. r^^eoordinate and communicate with the various• Boards, Commissions, Committees and the City Council on aU matters related to transportation an *- safety; b. b. 4ev pdevclopa safety materials to be used for promotional activities; C. Deve 1,pdevelop research materials needed for promotion of transportation a =affie­safety; d. d: Tr',eve1e develop a transportation arid -4a safety plan for the City; e. e.7-----4 vie ^"- e*tstmg-- midi -eview proposed transportation and traffic ordinances and make recommendations to the City Council; and Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: BM Formatted: Heading 3, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 3 + Numbering Style: A, B, C, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 0.5" + Tab after: 1" + Indent at: 1" Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto _ --------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: 1 Auto -- -------------------------- - - - - -- Formatted: Heading 4, Justified, Space After: 12 pt, Outline numbered + Level: 4 + Numbering Style: 1, 2, 3, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Aligned at: 1" + Tab after: 1.5" + Indent at: 1.5 - -- - -- - - ---------------------------- Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Bt4 Formatted: Font: Times New Roman, Not Italic, Font color: Auto Formatted: Bt4 �I! Formatted: Heading 5, Outline numbered + Level: 5 + Numbering Style: a, b, c, ... + Start at: 1 + Alignment: Left + Alianed at: 1.5" + Tab after: 2" + Indent at: 2" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" f oraser-traflspG Oat 4Gn-and4raffiG-&afet arc ,aur&es-for the-ai4zeas-of4he-Qy-',-afld L_g ------- 'a �pgpuicipatc in fact finding trips, conferences, and seminars related to transportation and traffic safety. Q Buildings and Standards Commission 1. Structure and Procedure of the Building_and Standards Commission C ompos tion and Procedures: a. The Building and Standards Commission is established in accordance with the provision of Chapter 54 of the LGC. Each case before the Building and Standards Commission must be heard by a majority the members. b� 'rbe i� Council will c rp sed of eve _S) members and two (2 ) alternates who are residents of the City, one -------------------------------- from each of the following professions or disciplines; Roistered design _professional with architectural e or a builder or Superintendent of building construction.- c.Risiered-Ds-ign Professional is--define-d--as--ai-i--indivi-d-ua-I.-Who is registered or licensed to practice their respective design profession as defined by the stqtutory-iNwi meats of the tarofessional registration ]a-,ALs af the state of Texas. d, If a resident with the above criteria cannot be found then the City Council may appoint Commission. 2. Duties and rova Appl Authority - ---- ---- The Ruih c UJ _ gandStandards orrinis, ties FR--r"- Commission sion shall have the following-du -- Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35' + 6.69" remedy, alleviate or remove any substandard bui I din, found to exist V. issue orders or directives to �an peace office or the state. including a a_sheriff or �const�ableor the �chief of police �mthe City of Schertz, to enforce and carry out the lawful orders or directives of the commission and vi. detemifire the amount and duration of the civil penalty the manic -- a -I tt y n a _y nqcqver__As pjqryi� ded 1 LGQ Section 54,017. C, The Building and Standards Commission has the authority to hear aMeals to decision from the fire chief, fire marshal, or fluLLbuilding official related i. the use of alternate materials and construction methods, or it. interpretations of the fire code or building codes as adopted by- the -Cly- cif -5cLleq7, -inc ludin but not limited to,-gran ]i thig exceptions to those Bodes in order to make a reasonable accommodation fora disabled person or group as defuzed by the Fair Housing—Amendment Act, d. The Buildin- and Standards Commission has the authority -tq-make a determination as to whether an alternative construction material or construction method equally iaacets tI c applicable ,LgNe code's standards, adequacy, slren,t�h saturation, and safer ibfic'sseeahlh and welfare. for pd— - —a-- renuest to use an alternative construction material or construction a. The Building sand Standards Commission has the authority to reverse a decision of the fire chief tire marshal or the building official only by concurring vote of at least four commission members. E The Budding and Standards Commission also has the follominy responsibilities: Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Associated UDC Sections with Amendments designee, or any taxpayer or any officer, department, or board of the City may at)r)eal the deers on of -the CityManagerprhis her-des-ifnec-tothe-Bu U LingandStandards Cornuni.ss-ion, I O A home oc !I c Manon shall produce no offensive noise vibration, smoke, moke — electrical rt --- --- — —_ -_ interferences, dust, odors, or heat detectable beyond the property limits or beyond the walls of the-dwellim4 unit,_Thej_qdgrner 's Officerp aj img a violation nt_ofthe_Cjty_ _erU n under this section shall be considered decisive and final unless formally appealed to the Planning and oniu Coagamission within thirty�3t}) days after the Code Enforcement Officer's written determination. c. The decision of the City �lanaer or his /her desis }nee mnapmpealcd to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with section 21 .4.14, d.The Pjqnnijigand Zoni ngCqqL issionwhl be tl e finaIjud went on.apligals which must be , submitted to th approval by the City Manaeer or his/her designee. 21.9.9.C.1 1, Protected Trees, Any Protected Trees not exemnpt fromn 1 enervation iar section 8.3. above may be removed upon approval of a Tree Removal Per-nrit by the Director of Parks Recreation and CorrinnitnityServicc eLAny_ &cjsion of the Director of Park s_Recp tion and CommunityServices rardina a free removal permit maybe appealedto the Planning and Ionin ission in accordance with section 21,4.14 of this UDC, Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Normal, Centered Formatted: Font: Not Italic Formatted: Font: Bold Formatted: Font: Bold LFormatted. Normal FForm.tted. Font Bold Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" 21.9.9.0.2 2. flcritqage_Treqs. —Any entage Trees to be removed may be removed u on f a,rree I L- - -_ -_ _Mp Removal Permit by the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services. Any decision oy the Director of Parks, Recreation and Ccnnmmuunitu Services re ardin� a tree removal permit may be appealed to the Plannin- , and A oning Commission in accordance with section 21.4.14 of this IJDCa All HeritageTrees, I _51,AheLoquired to meet the raitigqtionre-quirements ti of hs --sction, e - - - ---- - - - --- - ---- 21.9.12.F F. Revisions to Approved Site Plan. Changes to annapproved Site Plan shall be rocessed in the same manner as the original approved Site Plan; however, changes of details within a Site Plan wliic-li--do-- not --alte-r--the- basic -p-bysicaI relationship of ale prop o ask _g!yL_a4jagent_ppqpertydq_mQt a] cc the ards provided at the, boundary of the site as indicated oil the approved Site Plan, rnsvbe authorized by the City Manager or hislhcr designe an aggrievedarty ma a Teal the decision of the Pity — �Mana gror his/her designee to the Planning and Zoning Commission in accordance with the provisions of this UDC, 21.11.3.G G. Liability. The City designee, members of —Planning and Zondjg Commission, or other City employees charged with the enforcement of this Article. while acting forth efIty- in good 11 and without malice in tile discharge _flutter required -faim an — --- — ---------- wfth_q_�Ju -n -quire—by-this, Article or other pertinent laws, ordinances, codes or regulations shall not be rendered liable nersonalls, and are hereby relieved of oersonal liability fore any damage qccruin to persons oar pjope-ta.sa result of any act or by peason of an act or omission in the discharge e of official duties. Any suit instituted against an officer or employee because of an act performed by that officerorempipy -in the lawfihdiiwjtar g_of duties and under the -prod isionsof -this- Article shall be defended by a le al representative of the City iurtil the fznal termination of the proceedings. No ON official shall not be liable for cost in any action, suit, or proceeding that is instituted in-pursuance-of the-jrravisions of this Article writing along with the established fifing fee to the PlarmLng --,o � am 0 la�s after the date of denial or __qncIZrdng_C _ mission within ten CU_hcI_ revocation. 21,11.7.1 1. A iul �Ande�cision rendered by the City Manager his /her designee or od pL_ or personnel in the enforcement of this Article anay be ataacaleci to the Planilingand Zoning -ing Commission by all erson agent, or representative affected by such decision. SSuch nappeal must be red along with the established Jae. Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" 21.11.22.D.3d d, If a licensee's license has been susp ruledtwicce ce car enod and thic licensee then p commits another violation Linder this Article or other laws ordinances codes and regulations qi2 kicable hereto, the C i Iylana er car hislher designee shall notify the I3uiiding and Standards Commission. The Buildina and Standards Commission shall then hold a hearing to consider cancellation of the license. 21.11.22.D.4 4_A a1 A person whose license has been denied or revolaLd-rijay appeal i writing along —_g with the filing fee then in effect to the Buildinn and Standards Commission within ten (10) days 21.14.3.D D, Off-Street Parking. Off street parking Li' )ermitted adjacent to the landscape buffer along right- f:way, Parking and vehicular use areas adjacent to the right-of- sfiall have land berm of ---j- --- --3s� — - - -- -- walls or a vegetative hedge barrier to reduce vehicular reflections to the right-of-wU. A waiver rrzay_be_ ranted lan n i ng-AtIaZon i n 9- C o in rn i s s ion Wh ic li-Woul Would I oW- a- reduction an the minimum rcduil-ed landscape buffer when off - street parkiaig is located entirely alon>� the side or rear of the fajfldine or lot. 21.14.3.E -E'_ Building.Sedbajck Line. _A minimum fi ft Y-foo t(5-0buI ding sett -s- hq1H be�- r e 1 e adjacent to honing Commission which would allow for a reduction in the minimum reQUired setback when an alternative site layout and design-provides-for additional o mi s rdscaaimg and Gaff- street will be located -Race or lai L-- g- — -L entirely at the rear of the building or lot. In no case shall the minimum building setback be reduced-jess than 11Kd-se_tbackj-'qr-_thc- app icatLie district in accordance I _6 zqrj ----- --- - ------- - accordance - with Article 5. Formatted: Font: Not Italic Formatted: Normal, Centered Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Agenda No. 4 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 17 -S -41— Consideration and/or action on an amendment of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 4, Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facility Agreements and associated updates in UDC Articles 9, 12, and 16. (Final Reading) As stated in the UDC, City Council from time to time may make amendments, change or modify text to any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. It is generally considered good practice to periodically review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations. At the beginning of 2017, UDC Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facilities Agreements was identified as a section in need of revision. Planning, Engineering, and Public Works staff reviewed the section for consistency with requirements associated with subdivisions that require public infrastructure improvements and also evaluated the requirements in relation to Engineering Department's process for reviewing construction plans that are submitted for public infrastructure improvements associated with development. Planning and Engineering staff held a number of internal meetings to discuss what needed to be revised and to review proposed amendment drafts. As part of the internal evaluation process, staff also looked at surrounding jurisdictions to assure that the proposed amendments were similar in nature to other jurisdiction's requirements for public infrastructure improvements. The most significant change is to extend the length of a warranty bond from 1 to 2 years. Warranty bonds are provided by the developer /contractor to ensure repairs are to infrastructure (streets, water lines, sewer lines, etc.) made within the established time (currently 1 year and as proposed 2 years) based on defects in construction. Warranty bonds do not cover damage to infrastructure. Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. City Council Memorandum Page 2 City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of October 10, 2017. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Below is a summary of the proposed amendments to Section 21.4.15 • Change to the current Application :Requirements subsection to mention submittal and approval requirements for construction plans for public infrastructure improvements to provide consistency with construction plan approval requirements associated with processing of final plats. • Add expiration and extension requirements for construction plan approval. • Modify the term "Community Facilities Agreement" to "Improvement Agreements ". • Modify the term "maintenance bond" to "warranty bond ". • Modify the warranty bond requirement from one year to two years. • Add a definition for "Public Infrastructure" to the Definitions section of the UDC. • Revise UDC Section 21.12.10.F.2.a to be consistent with the proposed amendments to UDC Section 21.4.15. • Update UDC Section 21.9.10.F, Parkland Development Agreements, to provide consistency with Subsection 21.4.1.5.F. Goal To amend the UDC to review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations as well as establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Review and approve Ordinance 17 -S -41 amending the UDC, Article 4, Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facilities Agreements and associated updates in UDC Articles 9, 1.2, and 16. INVTG • ' • 4" I RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on September 13, 2017 . and offered a unanimous recommendation of approval. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -S -41 an amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 4, Section 21.4.15 — Public Infrastructure Improvement Construction Plans and Community Facilities Agreements and associated updates in UDC Articles 9, 12, and 16 as presented. City Council Memorandum Page 3 ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 17 -S -41 UDC Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvements, Construction Plans, and Improvement Agreements — :Red Lines ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -S -41 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 4, SECTION 21.4.15 PUBLIC INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND COMMUNITY FACILITIES AGREEMENTS AND ASSOCIATED UPDATES IN UDC ARTICLES 9, 12, AND 16; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10 -S -06, the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") adopted as Amended and Restated Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the "Current UDC "); and WHEREAS, City Staff and has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; and WHEREAS, on September 1.3, 2017 . the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and thereafter recommended approval; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and in the interest of the public safety, health and welfare; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Approved on first reading the 10th day of October, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 24th day of October, 2017. . Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) Exhibit A Unified Development Code Article 4, Section 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvements, Construction Plans, and Community Facilities Agreements Unified Development Code Articles 9, 12, and 1.6 See Attached Sec. 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Improvements, Construction Plans, and Improvement Agreements A. Applicability The provisions of this section applies to the construction of any public infrastructure improvements. B. Processing of Construction Plans and Decision 1. Submittal Construction plans shall be submitted to the City Manager or his /her designee prior to construction of public infrastructure improvements. Submittal of construction plans shall be in accordance with the Engineering Department's permitting requirements. 2. Decision by the City Manager The City Manager or his /her designee may approve, approve with conditions, or deny the construction plans. 3. Criteria for Approval The City Manager or his /her designee, or the City Council on appeal, shall apply the following criteria in making a decision on the construction plans: a. The construction plans are consistent with the approved preliminary plat or the proposed final plat in the event that the public infrastructure improvements are in relation to a plat; and b. The construction plans conform to all applicable regulations pertaining to the construction and installation of public infrastructure improvements. 4. Expiration The approval of construction plans shall remain in effect for two years after the date the construction plans were approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. If construction of the project has not commenced during the two year period, approval of the construction plans shall expire. For public infrastructure improvements that are associated with a final plat, approval of the construction plans shall remain in effect for the time that approval of the final plat is in effect and shall expire when approval of the final plat expires, unless an extension is granted, pursuant to Section 21.4.15.13.5, Extension. 5. Extension At the written request of the property owner or their representative, the expiration date for the approval of construction plans may be extended by the City Manager or his/her designee for a period not to exceed six (6) months. C. Timing of Public Infrastructure Improvements 1. Completion Prior to Final Plat Recordation For public infrastructure improvements associated with a proposed subdivision or development, except as provided below, completion of the improvements shall be in accordance with the approved construction plans and shall occur before an approved final plat is recorded, unless the obligation to construct public infrastructure improvements has been deferred and an improvement agreement is executed. 2. Installation after Final Plat Recordation. The property owner or applicant may request to defer the obligation to construct and install one (1) or more public improvements to serve the associated subdivision until after final plat recordation. The request shall be submitted in writing and specify what is being requested for deferral. Deferral of the obligation to install public improvements shall be conditioned on execution of an improvement agreement and provision of sufficient security. The City Manager or his /her designee may approve or deny the request to defer installation of public infrastructure improvements. 3. Off -Site Easements All necessary off -site easements required for installation of off -site public improvements to serve the subdivision or development shall be acquired by the subdivider or developer and conveyed solely to the City by an instrument approved by the City. D. Inspection and Acceptance of Public Infrastructure Improvements 1. Inspections Inspection of the public infrastructure improvements shall be conducted by the Engineering Department. Construction shall be in accordance with the approved construction plans. Any significant change in design required during construction shall be subject to approval by the City Manager or his /her designee. 2. Submission of As -Built Plans or Record Drawings The City shall not accept dedication of required public improvements until . the applicant has submitted detailed "as- built" record drawings in accordance with Engineering Department's requirements. 3. Acceptance of Improvements When the City Manager or his /her designee has determined that the public infrastructure improvements have been installed in accordance with the approved Construction Plans, the City Manager or his/her designee shall accept such improvements on behalf of the City. Acceptance of the improvements shall mean that the property owner has transferred all rights to all the public improvements to the City for use and maintenance. Upon acceptance of the required public improvements, the City Manager or his /her designee shall have a certificate issued to the property owner stating that all required public improvements have been satisfactorily completed. E. Maintenance and Warranty of Improvements 1. Maintenance During Construction The developer shall maintain all required public improvements during construction of the development. 2. Bond The developer or owner shall covenant to warranty the required public improvements for a period of two (2) years following acceptance by the City of all required public improvements or following the date of plat recordation, whichever occurs later. A warranty bond shall be provided in the amount of 20% of the costs of the improvements for such period. All public improvements shall be bonded. F. Improvement Agreements 1. Obligations Under Agreement Whenever public improvements to serve development are deferred until after recordation of the final plat, the property owner shall enter into an Improvement Agreement and provide adequate security as determined by the City Manager or his /her designee. The Improvement Agreement shall be subject to review and approval by the City Manager or his /her designee and the City Attorney. The agreement shall contain the following provisions: a. covenants to complete the improvements be no later than two (2) years after approval of the final plat, unless otherwise stipulated in the terms and conditions of the Improvement Agreement; b. covenants to warranty the required public improvements for a period of two (2) years following acceptance by the City of all required public improvements, unless stated otherwise in the Improvement Agreement; C. covenants to provide a warranty bond in the amount of 20% of the costs of the improvements for such period, unless stated otherwise in the Improvement Agreement; d. provisions for participation in the costs of the improvements by the City, if authorization has been obtained from the City Council, and a performance bond for such improvements from the contractor; e. provisions for securing the obligations of the agreement consistent with subsection G below; and f. such other terms and conditions as are agreed to by the City and the property owner, or as may be required by this UDC. 2. Covenants to Run with the Land The Improvement Agreement shall provide that the covenants contained in the Agreement run with the land and bind all successors, heirs and assignees of the property owner. All existing owners and lienholders shall be required to execute the Agreement or provide written consent to the covenants contained in the Agreement. G. Security for Completion of Improvements 1. Security Whenever the property owner has entered into an Improvement Agreement to defer installation of public improvements, the property owner shall provide sufficient security for completion of the required public improvements. The security shall be in the form of a cash escrow, a performance bond or surety bond provided by a licensed surety company, or other security as approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. 2. Amount and Acceptability The security shall be issued in the amount of 125% of the estimated cost of completion that is approved by the City Manager or his /her designee for the required public infrastructure improvements. The terms of the security agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager or his/her designee and the City Attorney. 3. Remedies Where an Improvement Agreement has been executed and security has been posted and required public improvements have not been installed in accordance with the terms of the agreement, the City may: a. declare the Agreement to be in default and require that all the public improvements be installed regardless of the extent of completion of the development at the time the Agreement is declared to be in default; b. obtain funds under the security and complete the improvements itself or through a third party; or assign its right to receive funds under the security to any third party, including a subsequent owner of the development in exchange for the subsequent owner's agreement and posting of security to complete the public infrastructure improvements. Associated UDC Sections with Amendments Sec. 21.16 - Definitions Public Infrastructure: Infrastructure that is generally for public use to include but not be limited to improvements of the following: water system (including water distribution lines, fire hydrants, valves and associated devices), wastewater (including lines, manholes, and lift stations), drainage system (including drainage easements, channels, storm sewer lines and inlets and associated landscaping), sidewalks, and roadways. Sec. 21.12.10.F.2.a Revise "maintenance bond" to "warranty bond" Sec. 21.9.10.E Revise title to "Parkland Improvement Agreement" and revise paragraph to read as follows: "The property owner or applicant may request to defer the obligation to dedicate parklands and/or develop parklands until after a final plat recordation. The request shall be submitted in writing and specify what is requested for deferral. Deferral of the obligation to dedicate parkland and/or develop parklands shall be conditioned on execution of an Improvement Agreement and provision of sufficient security, pursuant to Section 21.4.15.17, Improvement Agreements. The City Manager or his/her designee may approve or deny the request to defer obligations to dedicate parkland dedication and /or develop parklands." See. 21.4.15 Public Infrastructure Im and I Formatted: Font: Times New Roman Formatted: Font: Times New Roman The provisions of this section s to the constructio LMp - lies to infrastructure immovements, ,L 13, Processing of Applie-a6ai,Construction Plans and Decision Submittal to-€ l Construction Mans shall be submitted to the Citv Manager or his/her ckesif,neepnor to construction —ofpublic infirastructure vm im i ents_ -�-m — Submittal of construction plane shall be in accordance with the Eqgjnearint; agpgi:tplqLit'-S_p_qrmit.tLq_&_Eqquire-meli-ts. Decision by the Difeekff-ef-P�- o4s-City Manager trtxett @n�a cri-t •'t .,F ti,., t,;€T�� . T „� .ai <, +., �,..i °m icrci%” st — si- `vzmc-zvr- sis`��ccere-ns i-.ni-ca-rc��=rcr:sn-c eic-cear-ccnsc-�: 3. ev FW its ORS W- ofk�,, Sr -rH�pa-yer- or -aii"ff+c-er— depaament ofJaea' d or-�y nay 1 the e a-p,pe ezav -cry+: c.siffii xru ri crx r°iii-e°vezrzic:s ,. � ..., la-i-ke£. i�- �- 'r,`nisir- zces� +-b,� , impu' i:-.cae, . - n-'' - nzezri s- i-gisr d•r� r tL,: ;�;�- , lea h'1 ue z'c rrrd d xx ,nr�c. r l-i£-ensed- nx-s= State Elf T e;fa -s= C3ae City IVlanaer or histlaer designee anav approve, approve with conditions, or deny the construction plans. D3, _Criteria for Approval his/her desi nee, or the City Council on appeal, s- -c � °shall apply the following criteria in maki g a decision on the coa�strr�ciior clans: 4 . 4heThe construction plans are consistent with the approved preliminary plat or the proposed final plat; a. in the event that the�ublac infrastructure improvements are in relation to a Rlat; and Formatted: Heading 4 Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5" :b...._. The construction plans conform to all applicable regulations Formatted: Heading 5 pertaining to the construction and installation of public infrastructure improvements; —and-, 3t1�- pla�rs- lave- hee +r -�-ev i�we€i- and- appr�sve¢i -hy- Elm- C- ity- iingin€cd =: At the written request of the�roperty owner or their r —the emirratilon—c—late—for the —aP-PrQLaL—of-construction plans znay be extended by the £�ity Manager or histher desi�,nee for a period not to exceed six months. Timing of Public Infrastructure hnpfev--iRefft-C r *� Improvements Completion Prior to Final Plat Recordation his/her designee may approve or deny the request to defer installation of' public infrastructure improvements. Off-Site Easements All necessary off—site easements required for installation of off site public improvements to serve the subdivision or development shall be acquired by the subdivider or developer and conveyed solely to the City by a--deedan instrument approved by the City-Attorney- ments Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5" the Pn i °neeYin > Ike art_ent, Construction shall be in accordance with the apkruved construction —design ijectuuirce[ duri� construction shall be subject to approval by tlae City Manager or his/her debt nee, — 2, ------ Submission of As -Built Plans or- record -D-rawbw The City-shall not accotcledication of required )ubfic improvements until the applicant has submitted detailed "as-built" record L -drawings in -- accordance with Engineering neering enaqMej�'s r C uirements. 3. —Acceptance of lmprovements When the City _Manager orhLi5.Lhe_Ldesi - � 9119 e has - d- eennne- d Lthat-th-e PUPC infrasti-LctuEginpEgyqm���nstalled in accordance with the approved Construction Plans the City �ianacr or his /her desi e shall accept such improvements on behalf of y�—AmqcejiLance of the improvements hall mean that the -prp�ertK owner has_ t.ransfeiTeddLfi&s to all the hjMvernents to the Cj- and maintenance. U on acceptance of the required laublie improvements, the City ager or his /her designee shall have a certificate issued to the pra e°rty owner stating that all required - ub—fic — improvements have been, GO m 1 let- e -. E. Maintenance and Warranty Of IMDrovements I Maintenance Duri 'The devel I r ic improvements durbag construction d ent, , D-0—fthe - - e- m4y-F„ ,;t;t ',� The developer or owner shall covenant to warranty the required u}� blic j"i rovements for aTeriod of t-o 21years fbIl -L — — City of all required public immovements or followin2 the date of Mat rocopdqCiqj_i_whichcver occurs later, A warranty bond shall be p ii nov L fee im the amount of 20% of the costs of the improvements for such period. All ---------------- Dtiblic immovements shall be bonded, e. provisions for securing the obligations of the agreement consi; with subsection G below; and f. such other terms and conditions as are agreed to by the City -an property owner- an44he -C, or as may be required by this UDi 2. Covenants to Run with the Land G. Security for Completion of Improvements Security Whenever the ebltsonxaroperty owner has entered into an Im rp weT Ag ernent to install -defer installation of public improvements4e --ser flat, the property owner shall provide sufficient security to ennui completion of the required public improvements. The security shall 1 the form of en rf-the 44ow-in#: a- a cash escrow wattrth Cites b� -a performance bond or surety bond provided by a licensed st company, e; -u-6e - crrr.. -aacc, ci z,rlvu,. ,nun, •y i.c ny i<acvi'?.sr-anarn;e�rrvzr- vas -c;; irrs by the pederal 1} t Enstrranee Ctrrprrrut' or Fe( p° "� e t the c i �1t vv the d pv t cc c�sar '-e a,zP ,.ter d- a- #- ,°sgre -e menu "-a-f fi:nother security as approved by the y7M nager or his/her designee. 2. Amount and Acceptability The security shall be issued in the amount of 125% of the est-i-nia-ted- es-4filatepof completion that is approved by the City i D ef--lB jb4 of6,Manar;er or his/her designee for althe rec rr� .red pi infrastructure improvements to w4h ahti saber The tern the security agreement shall be subject to the approval of the City Manager or his/her designee and the City Attorney. firroi=n i% s�pci "i= rm-- 3r'n:arr-r'�s°,— rea%z"i� cr"c-rcrx- :a-a-r gcaurii- .�cc�.'s'ov%rres `av= crrxa�a -43. Remedies Where x, fnr c4 4ie tan Imrsrovement Agreement has been executed and security has been posted and required public improvements have not been installed in accordance with the terms of the agreement, the City may: a. declare the aggree-xe&A r eement to be in default and require that all the public improvements be installed regardless of the extent of completion of the development at the time the agfeesoentAgreement, is declared to be in default; b. obtain funds under the security and complete the improvements itself or through a third party; or C. assign its right to receive funds under the security to any third party, including a subsequent owner of the development in exchange for the subsequent owner's agreement and posting of security to complete the public infrastructure improvements�ervi*g -th-e tract. I4. In�peetier ec-e ne- "f-- public- lrnffcrvernerua Urida_te_ Article _16- _Definitions_to- include: Public Infrastructure- Infrastructure that is generally for public use to include but not be limited to improvements of to following: water system ( "including water distribution lines, fire hyd:rants, valves and associated devices), wastewater (includli lines, manholes ani lift stations drainne system (inchrdina drainage easements, channels storm sewer- lines and inlets and associated .landscaping) si_cigw21ksi2rldl a_oadwgy_s- lJpdatn to_Section 21812,- 1Q.F.2.a to rev- se " a:iritenana-e b -and to °`warranty bond°'-.. iJpdate to Section 219.1 Q.F to charse the title to "Parkland Improvement Agreement" and the para�ryraph to read, "The property owner or applicant may request to defer the obligation to d cordation. The request shall be submitted in writiniy and specifv what is requested for deferral. Deferral of the pbj-i�_Yadon to dedicate and/or devieplLparklands shall be conditioned on execution of an ImDrovement Aueement and provision of sufficient security, pursuant to Section 21.4,15T Aillythe request to defer obli ations to dedicate parkland dedication and/or S", Formatted: Indent: Left: 1.5" T--he-Qty-,ha4-ii*t-a,c eept--4ediea of--requif ed-fAibhe-impf -m -s }*A-44he xxvaxi .nSr"c'rx. - c'rrrr^vs— u—'.s' rE r w;, " ,rrcr ,rc -g A. J-k'- 1-fl Agenda No. 5 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 17 -S -42— Consideration and/or action on an amendment of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 4, Section 21.4.3 Notice Requirements and associated update to UDC Section 21.5.4.C.2. (Final Reading) As stated in the UDC, City Council from time to time may make amendments, change or modify text to any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. It is generally considered good practice to periodically review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested Planning staff to research requirements that other cities have to posting public hearing notice signs on project sites for zoning change requests. Staff conducted research that involved reviewing surrounding jurisdictions' Code requirements, contacting other cities to discuss typical sign size, content of signs, responsibility of posting the notice signs, and implementation of the requirements. The research also included collecting price estimates for signs, and communicating with the City's sign shop to determine the feasibility of producing signs in- house. Two workshops were conducted with the Planning & Zoning Commission on July 26, 2017 . and August 9, 2017. As proposed, zoning change applicants would be required to post signs provided by the City along the frontage of their property at least 11 days prior to P &Z consideration. Signs need to be kept up until after the City Council hearing and applicants are required to replace any signs that are removed during this time. Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of October 10, 20917. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS: Below is a summary of the proposed amendments to Section 21.4.3 City Council Memorandum Page 2 • Amending Section 21.4.3 to add a new subsection called "Posted Notice" that requires posting a notice on the premises of the project site for certain public hearing items. • Section 21.5.4.C.2 is modified to require posted notice as a requirement for Zone Change /Zoning Map Amendment applications. Goal To amend the UDC to review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations as well as establish and maintain . sound stable and desirable development. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Review and approve Ordinance 1.7 -5 -42 amending the UDC, Article 4, Section 21.4.3 Notice Requirements and associated update to UDC Section 21.5.4.C.2. FISCAL IMPACT At this time staff is not proposing additional fee for the notice signs. Staff has contacted several sign companies and determined the approximate cost for a single color double sided 1.8" by 24" corrugated plastic sign with a metal stake is $11. Based on a review of zoning cases from the FY201.6 -201.7 budget year and projections for the FY 2017 -201.8 budget year, we anticipate needing 4 signs per case for 10 zoning cases with an additional 15% for replacement signs, totaling 46 sign for the FY2017 -2018 budget year. The estimated cost for 46 signs is $506. The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on September 13, 2017 and offered a unanimous recommendation of approval. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -5 -42 an amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 4, Section 21.4.3 — Notice Requirements and associated update to UDC Section 21.5.4.C.2 as presented. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 17 -5 -42 ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -S -42 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 4, SECTION 21.4.3 NOTICE REQUIREMENTS AND ASSOCIATED UPDATE TO UDC SECTION 21.5.4.C.2; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10 -S -06, the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") adopted as Amended and Restated Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the "Current UDC "); and WHEREAS, City Staff and has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; and WHEREAS, on September 13, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and thereafter recommended approval; and WHEREAS, on October 1.0, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and in the interest of the public safety, health and welfare; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective November 23, 2017 the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Approved on first reading the 1 Oth day of October, 2017. . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 24th day of October, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) Exhibit A Unified Development Code Article 4, Section 21.4.3 Notice Requirement Unified Development Code Articles 5, Section 21.5.4.C.2 See Attached See. 21.4.3 Notice Requirements A. Published Notice Whenever published notice of a public hearing before a Board, Commission, Committee or the City Council is required, the City Manager or his/her designee shall cause notice to be published in an official newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the City before the fifteenth (I 5th) day before the date set for the required hearing. Said notice shall set forth the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing as required under LGC section 211.006(a). B. Written Notice Whenever written notice of a public hearing before a Board, Commission, Committee or the City Council is required, before the tenth (I Oth) day before the hearing date, the City Manager or his/her designee shall cause written notice to be sent to each owner, as indicated by the most recently approved municipal tax roll, of real property within 200 feet of the exterior boundary of the property in question. Said notice shall set forth the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing as required under LGC section 211.007(c). The notice may be served by its deposit, properly addressed with postage paid, in the United States mail. If the property within 200 feet of the property in question is located in territory within the City and is not included on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, notice to such owners shall be given by one (1) publication in an official newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least fifteen (15) days before the date of the hearing. Failure of owners to receive notice of hearing shall in no way affect the validity of the action taken. C. Posted Notice Whenever posted notice of a public hearing is required, notification signs shall be posted by the applicant a minimum of eleven (11) days prior to the scheduled public hearing and shall remain posted during the course of the public hearings, until such time that final action has been taken on the permit application. Signs shall be posted on the subject property and/or along public right-of-way in a format approved by the City Manager or his/her designee. The number of signs, size of signs and content to be placed on the signs shall be in accordance with the Development Manual. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to periodically check sign locations to verify that signs remain in place and have not been vandalized or removed. The applicant shall replace any missing or defective signs within one (1) business day from the time that a City official notifies the applicant that the signs are missing. It is unlawftil for a person to alter any notification signs, or to remove it while the case is pending. Removal or alteration that is beyond the control of the applicant shall not constitute a failure to meet notification requirements of this section. Associated UDC Section 21.5.4.C.2 Sec. 21.5.4.C.2 2. Notification Requirements An application for a zoning change or zoning map amendment requires the following notification in accordance with section 21.4.3: a. written notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and b. published notice prior to consideration by the City Council. c. posted notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and prior to consideration by the City Council. PROPOSED REVISIONS TO SECTION 21.4.3 & 21.5.4 Sec. 21.4.3 Notice Requirements A. Published Notice Whenever published notice of a public hearing before a Board, Commission, Committee or the City Council is required, the City Manager or his /her designee shall cause notice to be published in an official newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the City before the fifteenth (15th) day before the date set for the required hearing. Said notice shall set forth the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing as required under LGC section 211.006(a). B. Written Notice Whenever written notice of a public hearing before a Board, Commission, Committee or the City Council is required, before the tenth (10th) day before the hearing date, the City Manager or his/her designee shall cause written notice to be sent to each owner, as indicated by the most recently approved municipal tax roll, of real property within 200 feet of the exterior boundary of the property in question. Said notice shall set forth the date, time, place and purpose of the hearing as required under LGC section 21.1.007(c). The notice may be served by its deposit, properly addressed with postage paid, in the United States mail. If the property within 200 feet of the property in question is located in territory within the City and is not included on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, notice to such owners shall be given by one (1) publication in an official newspaper or a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least fifteen (15) days before the date of the hearing. Failure of owners to receive notice of hearing shall in no way affect the validity of the action taken. C. Posted Notice PROPOSED REVISIONS TO SECTION 21.4.3 & 21.5.4 See. 21.5.4 Zoning Change /Zoning Map Amendment A. Applicability 1. The City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, by request of the City Manager or his /her designee, or by application from a property owner, establish or amend the boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City. A zoning change or zoning map amendment is required to establish the use of land and the development associated with the proposed zoning classification for the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City. 2. Approval of a zoning change or zoning map amendment authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the amendment. B. Application Requirements 1. Application Required Any request for a zoning change or zoning map amendment shall be accompanied by an application and zoning exhibit prepared in accordance with the Development Services Department Development Manual. 2. Accompanying Applications A request for a zoning change or zoning map amendment may be accompanied by an application for amendment of the Future Land Use Map or by a Subdivision Master Plan. Approval of a zoning change or zoning map amendment shall require all subsequent development applications to be consistent with the approved amendments. 3. Tax Certificate Required All applications made as a request for a zoning change or zoning map amendment shall be accompanied by a copy of a Tax Certificate. C. Processing of Application and Decision. 1. Submittal An application for a zoning change or zoning map amendment shall be submitted to the City Manager or his /her designee. The City Manager or his/her designee shall review the application for completeness in accordance with section 21.4.2. The City Manager or his /her designee may, at its option, request a recommendation from any other City Department or PROPOSED REVISIONS TO SECTION 21.4.3 & 21.5.4 consultant. The City Manager or his /her designee shall notify the applicant of items requiring correction or attention before providing a recommendation on the application. After appropriate review, the City Manager or his/her designee shall forward a written recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 2. Notification Requirements Agenda No. 6 City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Library Subject: Consideration and /or action approving Resolution No. 17 -R -92 authorizing a Public Library Interlocal Agreement with Guadalupe County BACKGROUND The City of Schertz and Guadalupe County have had an interlocal agreement regarding the provision of library service to County residents since 1981. The Commissioners' Court has long held the view that library services are beneficial to all County residents and has entered into agreements with each of the three public libraries in the County to provide library service to all its residents for many years. The proposed Interlocal Agreement is for one fiscal year, from October 1, 2017 through September 30, 2018, and renews each successive year. The agreement can be terminated by either party with written notice not less than 30 days prior to the agreement's end. This Interlocal agreement is mutually advantageous to both the County and the City. It allows the County to efficiently and economically provide library service to its residents who would not otherwise have it, and the City receives funds that help offset operating costs for its residents. It should be noted that the vast majority of Guadalupe County Schertz Library card holders live within the city limits of the cities of Schertz, Cibolo and Selma and are entitled to use the Schertz Library as a result of Schertz resident status, or as a result of agreements the City of Schertz has with the other cities. Only 4.8% of the library's cardholders live in other parts of Guadalupe County. As a reminder, the City of Cibolo has provided funding for the Schertz Library since the late 1990s. . There is no interlocal agreement in place, rather the City of Schertz sends a letter to the City Manager of Cibolo requesting funding for the upcoming year. The current year's request is in the amount of $35,000. The City of Selma has provided funding since 2009 and the current Interlocal agreement will provide approximately $20,000 in the upcoming fiscal year. One other item of note —it has been the Schertz Library's practice to allow residents of the State of Texas to use the library free of charge. Out of state residents pay $15.00 per person per year to have full access to all resources. The Texas State Library has a program called Texshare that Schertz participates in. The program allows Schertz Library cardholders to have CCM Guadalupe Co ILA access to resources, though often on a limited basis, at other participating libraries, including the San Antonio Public Library System, Seguin Library and the New Braunfels Library System. FISCAL IMPACT The County will pay the City $217,152 in monthly installments of $18,096.00 for Library Services as outlined in the ILA under section III. Consideration. The Schertz Library budget is approximately $922,000 for FYI 8. �I 1• Staff recommends adoption of Resolution 17 -R -92 authorizing the Public Library Interlocal Agreement with Guadalupe County to permit all citizens of the County to utilize the City's library facilities. ATTACHMENT Resolution 17 -R -92 with Public Library Interlocal Agreement attached. CCM Guadalupe Co ILA EXHIBIT A PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT See attached CCM Guadalupe Co ILA RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -92 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, AND OTHER MATTERS IN K1701�.1 x61111 CWO I WHEREAS, the City Council (the "City Council ") of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into a Public Library Interlocal Agreement with the Guadalupe County, Texas (the "County "), permitting the citizens of the County to utilize the services of the City's public library; now, therefore, 1 IN11ER i. 141.1", III�iAIY�'a`.YIY I_�1M Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Public Library Interlocal Agreement with Guadalupe County in substantially the form set forth on F,xhihit A Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 24r' day of October, 2017. . CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, TRMC, CMC City Secretary (CITY SEAL) SCHERTZ Selma ILA Library.doc EXHIBIT A PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT See attached SCHERTZ Selma ILA Library.doc A -]. STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § 100- 630 - 800.4945 PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN GUADALUPE COUNTY AND THE CITY OF SCHERTZ This Public Library InterLocal Agreement, effective as of the date of final execution (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement "), is between Guadalupe County (hereinafter referred to as "County "), Texas, and the City of Schertz, (hereinafter referred to as "City "), Texas. WHEREAS, the City has an established public library and has for several years provided free public library services to all citizens of the County residing in or near the City by informal agreement with the County; and WHEREAS, the County and the City have determined to enter into this Agreement relating to the provision of free public library services (hereinafter referred to as "Library Services "), to the citizens of the County, and to set out the purposes, terms, rights, objectives, duties, and responsibilities of the County and the City with respect thereto; and WHEREAS, the County and the City have determined that the provision of the Library Services is a public purpose and within their statutory powers of government; and WHEREAS, the County and City are political subdivisions of the State of Texas, and are authorized to execute this Agreement pursuant to Texas Government Code 791.001 et. seq. as amended, and Local Government Code Section 323, as amended (the "Act "). NOW, THEREFORE, the County and the City, acting by and through their duly authorized officers, hereby covenant and agree as follows: I. Purpose 1. The City agrees that the established library of the City shall assume the functions of a county library within the County, all as permitted by the Act. 2. The Librarian of the City's established library holds a county librarian's certificate from the Texas Library and Archives Commission, as required by the Act. 3. All public library facilities, books, reading material, and other equipment in the possession of the City's library shall be equally accessible to all residents of the County during the term of this Agreement. 4. All public library facilities, books, reading material, and other equipment currently owned by the City of acquired for use in its established public library during the term of this Agreement shall remain the property of the City. H. Term and Renewal This agreement shall be for a term commencing with effective date of this Agreement through and including October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 (the "Initial Term "), unless either party to this Agreement notifies the other party in writing that it wishes to terminate this Agreement. Such notice shall Page - 1 - of Two Pages be provided not less than thirty (30) days prior to the end of the Initial Term or any Renewal Term. III. Consideration 1. In consideration of the City's provision of the Library Services during the Initial Term, the county agrees to pay the City a monthly sum of $18,096.00 (Eighteen Thousand, ninety six Dollars and 00 /100) on the 15th day of each month following the effective date of this Agreement. 2. The County and the City agree that the monthly amount payable by the County to the City shall be determined by good faith negotiations between the County and City and that such amount shall be determined not less than thirty (30) days before the end of the Initial Term and each Renewal Term. IV. Authorization The governing bodies of the County and the City have duly authorized this Agreement. V. Severability If any portion of this Agreement shall be declared illegal or held unenforceable for any reason, for remaining portions hereof shall continue in full force and effect. VI. Amendments This agreement represents the complete understanding of the County and the City with respect to the matters described herein, and this Agreement may not be amended or altered without the written consent of both parties. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have entered into the Public Library InterLocal Agreement, effective as stated herein. GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS By: Kyle Kutscher Guadalupe County Judge CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS C John Kessel City Manager ATTEST By: Teresa Kiel Guadalupe County Clerk Date: ATTEST C Brenda Dennis City Secretary Date: Page - 2 - of Two Pages Agenda No. 7 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Ordinance No. 17 -S -43— Consideration and/or action on an amendment of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 1.4, Section 21.14.6.A Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails- Requirements. (Final Reading) As stated in the UDC, City Council from time to time, on its own motion, or at the recommendation of City Staff make amendments, change or modify text to any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. It is generally considered good practice to periodically review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations. Based on the update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and changes in development it has becomes necessary to update the UDC. Public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express News on September 20, 2017. . City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of October 1.0, 2017. In order to promote the development of a walkable community, Staff is proposing to revise UDC Section 21.14.6.A to remove the exemption for sidewalks along Interstate Highways 35 and 10. Staff is proposing that UDC Section 21.14.6.A Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails - Requirements be amended to read as follows: • "Sidewalks shall be required along both sides of all streets throughout the City as required in section 21.14.1. All lots must have access to sidewalks." Goal To amend the UDC to review and update the development regulations due to changing conditions, community goals and State and Federal regulations as well as establish and maintain sound stable and desirable development. City Council Memorandum Page 2 Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. Summary of Recommended Action Review and approve Ordinance 1.7 -S -43 amending the UDC, Article 1.4, Section 21.1.4.6.A. Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails- Requirements. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION The Planning and Zoning Commission conducted the public hearing on September 27, 2017 and offered a unanimous recommendation of approval. The UDC currently does not require sidewalks to be constructed along Interstate Highways 35 and 10. It is the opinion of staff that sidewalks should be required along all roadways in order to promote pedestrian access and a walkable community. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -S -43 an amendment to the Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 14, Section 21.14.6.A Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails- Requirements as presented. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 1.7 -S -43 UDC Article 14, Section 21.14.6.A Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails — Requirements — Red Lines ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -S -43 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III, SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 14, SECTION 21.14.6.A SIDEWALKS AND HIKE AND BIKE TRAILS- REQUIREMENTS; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10 -S -06, the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") adopted as Amended and Restated Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the "Current UDC "); and WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2017 the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and thereafter recommended approval; and WHEREAS, on October 10, 2017 the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendment is appropriate and in the interest of the public safety, health and welfare; BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Approved on first reading the 1 Oth day of October, 2017. . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 24th day of October, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) o l • Unified Development Code Article 14 Transportation Section 21.1.4.6 Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails- Requirements. See Attached See. 21.14.6 Sidewalks and Hike and Bike Trails A. Requirement Sidewalks shall be required along both sides of all streets throughout the City as required in section 21.14.1. All lots must have access to sidewalks. 21.14.6— Sidewalks and Hike and Bike A. Sidewalks shall be required along both sides of all streets throughout the City as required in section 21.14.1 ^pt ^'effg 1 °t* ^wig ways -3 rand = rr., All lots must have access to-eeftefete sidewalks. B. Curb Ramps. Curb ramps shall be provided at all street intersections at the time of construction or reconstruction and shall comply with the provisions in the Federal Register 28, CFR part 36 (Americans with Disabilities Act or ADA) and Texas Accessibility Standards as amended from time to time. C. Location and Width. Where sidewalks are required, they shall be installed in accordance with the Public Works Specifications Manual and shall be a minimum of five feet (5) in width. Sidewalks shall be placed parallel to the street for the entire frontage(s) of the lot and shall be located a minimum of two feet (2') behind the curb. D. Timing of Construction. Sidewalks shall generally be installed concurrently with the construction of the primary structure on a lot except on primary or secondary arterials where they shall be installed concurrently with street construction. E. Construction Concurrent with Street Construction. If a street is constructed which shall have no residential lot access points, then sidewalks shall be installed concurrently with street construction. F. Corner Lot. Where sidewalks are installed on corner lots, sidewalks shall be installed along both street frontages and shall be extended to the curb with handicapped access ramps in accordance with current ADA and Texas Accessibility standards. G. Waiver or Deferment of Sidewalk Installation. The City Manager or the City Engineer may waive the requirements of this section where he /she finds that topographical conditions or other unique conditions exist which would preclude the construction of sidewalks. The Planning and Zoning Commission may defer the installation of sidewalks to a time deemed more appropriate. In the event that the installation of sidewalks is deferred, the developer shall provide a subdivision improvement agreement in accordance with section 21.4.15 guaranteeing the installation of sidewalks. H. Hike and Bike Trails. The City recognizes the need for connectivity and adequate access to and from public parkland areas and to provide for safe bicycling and pedestrian transportation. All streets subject to this Article with at least an eighty -six inch (86 ") ROW shall be required to construct a minimum eight foot (8') wide hike and bike path located within the ROW five foot (5') behind the curb. This hike and bike path is required in -lieu of construction of a sidewalk along one (1) side of the street. Additionally, hike and bike trails shall conform to the requirements as set forth in the City's Parks Master Plan. In -lieu of construction of sidewalks in accordance with this Article, the City may, at its option, require construction of a hike and bike path adjacent to the street right -of -way. Any required hike and bike path shall be constructed in -lieu of the minimum sidewalk along one (1) side of the street, unless under the requirements of subsection 21.14.3.D. above. Style Definition: Normal: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Space After: 0 pt, Line spacing: single Style Definition: Heading 1: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Centered, Space Before: 0 pt, Line spacing single, Don't keep lines together Style Definition: Heading 2: Font: (Default) Times New Roman, 12 pt, Space Before: 0 pt, Line spacing: single, Don't keep lines together Style Definition: Heading 3: Font: +Headings (Calibri Light), 12 pt, Not Bold, Font color: Accent 1, Space Before: 2 pt, Line spacing: single Style Definition: Heading 4: Font: +Headings (Calibri Light), 12 pt, Not Bold, Font color: Accent 1, Space Before: 2 pt, Line spacing: single � Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition Style Definition - - -- Style Definition: IistO -- -- ----- - - - - -- Style Definition: p0 Style Definition: b0 - _ - Style Definon: h0 IS - Style Definition. seclink Style Definition: histo note (-Style Definition: sec Style Definition: Title - — .......................................................... Style Definition: Subtitle Style Definition: r0 Style Definition: Followe'dHyperlink Style Definition: bkmk Style Definition: incr2 Style Definition: content3 - - -- - - - - -- --- - - - - -J Style Definition: incr0 Style Definition: contentl Ctyle Definition: incrl _ -____ -____ -_ .Style Definition: content2 Style Definitionm refnote Style Definition: hg0 - -------- Formatted: Font: 11.5 pt, Bold Formatted: Font: 11.5 pt, Bold _.. Formatted: Font: 11.5 pt, Bold {Formatted: Font: Not Italic Formatted: Normal, Indent: Left: 0.5" Formatted: Tab stops: Not at 3.35" + 6.69" Agenda No. 8 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Subject: BACKGROUND City Secretary Cancellation of the November 7, 2017 City Council meeting At the request of Mayor Carpenter and Council, this item is being placed on the agenda to consider cancelling the November 7, 2017 City Council meeting due to election night. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the cancellation of the November 7, 2017 City Council meeting. Agenda No. 9 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: City Secretary Subject: Calling A Special meeting to Canvass Results of the November 7, 2017 election and swearing in ceremony. The official canvassing period for the November 7, 2017 . Election is November 10 through November 20, 2017. It has been recommended by the County Election Administrators that the City call a special meeting to canvass the results of the City of Schertz Genera] election on Monday, November 20, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council call a special meeting for Monday, November 20, 2017 to canvass the results of the November 7, 2017 General election. Agenda No. 10 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Police Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -90 Authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement for the purchase of eight (8) 2017 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicles Background Within each fiscal budget year, the Police Department budgets to purchase vehicles for the purpose of replacing older vehicles. Older vehicles may no longer be serviceable due to mechanical failures, physical damage from accidents or vehicles that have reached their end of life due to maintenance costs being greater than the vehicle's market value. Some purchases also include the purpose of adding vehicles to the fleet that coincides with the hiring of additional staff. For the 2017/ 2018 budget year, the police department was approved to purchase eight (8) patrol vehicles. Goal To authorize the City Manager to execute the contract with Rockdale Country Ford for the purchase of eight (8) 2017 Ford Police Interceptor Utility Vehicles. Community Benefit In order to provide services to the community, the police department needs to maintain a reliable fleet of vehicles that will allow Officers to respond to calls for service within the community. Summary of Recommended Action Approval of this resolution will allow the purchase of the eight (8) requested Patrol Vehicles. The purchase of these vehicles will be completed through Rockdale Country Ford, under BuyBoard agreement #521 -16 Fiscal Impact The purchase of these Patrol Vehicles will be funded through the city's general fund. The fiscal impact of this project will be $21.2,400.00. These funds were approved in the current budget. Recommendation Approval of Resolution 17 -R -90 Attachment(s) Resolution 17 -R -90 Quote from Rockdale Country Ford Quote Tabulation Sheet RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -90 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF EIGHT (8) POLICE PATROL VEHICLES. WHEREAS, the Schertz Police Department has a need to purchase eight (8) Patrol Vehicles; and WHEREAS, the Schertz Police Department has done due diligence in investigating what type vehicle would best suit the needs of the department, the best quality vehicle to ensure longevity and overall pricing; and WHEREAS, the Schertz Police Department has chosen Rockdale Country Ford, a BuyBoard National Purchasing Cooperative vendor, for the purchase of eight (8) 2017 Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles; and WHEREAS, purchases under the cooperative programs meet the requirements under the Texas Local Government Purchasing Code rule for cooperative purchases as adopted by the City of Schertz Resolution 1.1 -R -41 on August 30, 2011 amending the City's purchasing policy; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz will fund the purchase of the Patrol Vehicles through the City's general fund. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to contract with Rockdale Country Ford pursuant to the vendor quote and relevant BuyBoard award information attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Supporting Documentation "). BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to accept the BuyBoard quote attached in Exhibit A and issue a Purchase Order compliant with the BuyBoard member procedures to Rockdale Country Ford in the amount of TWO HUNDRED AND TWELVE THOUSAND, FOUR HUNDRED DOLLARS ($212,400). Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of October, 2017. . CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Donna Schmoekel, Deputy City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50234811.1 EXHIBIT A 50234811.1 A -�. End User: CITY OF SCHERTZ ROCKDALE COUNTRY FORD BUYBOARD BID 521 -16 B. Published Options [Itemize each below] Code Options Bid Price Code Options Bid Price K8A 2017 PURSUIT PKG B $ 2,510.00 FRONT HEADLAMP HOUSING INCL 3.7L FFV V6; 6 -SPD AUTOMATIC INCL FOR HIDE -A -WAY LIGHTS A/C & HEAT; AM/FM /CD INCL REAR TAILIGHT HOUSING INCL CRUISE; RUBBER FLOOR INCL FOR HIDE -A -WAY LIGHTS POWER WINDOWS AND LOCKS INCL GRILL WIRING PACKAGE INCL CLOTH BUCKETS FRONT INCL VINYL 2ND ROW SEAT INCL SEVERAL IN STOCK TO THIS REAR VIEW CAMERA INCL SPEC DRIVER SIDE SPOT LIGHT INCL COURTESY LAMP DISABLED INCL KEYLESS ENTRY INCL Total of B. Published Options: 1 $ 2,510.00 C. Unpublished Options [Itemize each below, not to exceed 25 %] $= 0.0 % Options Bid Price Options Bid Price M. Trade in: WHITE COLOR ESTIMATED 7 -10 BUSINESS DAYS DELIVERY D. Pre - delivery Inspection: E. Texas State Inspection: F. Manufacturer Destination /Delivery: G. Floor Plan Interest (for in -stock and /or equipped vehicles): H Lot Insurance (for in -stock and /or equipped vehicles): L Contract Price Adjustment: J. Additional Delivery Charge: K. Subtotal: L. Quantity Ordered M. Trade in: 0 miles 8 x Line K = N. BUYBOARD FEE PER PURCHASE ORDER: O. TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE WITH BUYBOARD FEE: Total of C. Unpublished Options: $ - $ $ - $ 950.00 250.00 $ - $ $ 26,500.00 12,000.00 $ 400.00 $ 212,400.00 Purchasing & Asset Management Department Griffith Ford Silsbee Ford Rockdale Ford Bluebonnet Ford Quote Tabulation Sheet Seguin, Tx New Braunfels, BuyBoard Tx Department: Police #521 -16 Awarded: Rockdale Ford Delivery of Item (measure in No.: Qty: Description: Unit Price Ext. Price Unit Price Ext. Price Unit Price Ext. Price Unit Price Ext. Price 1 8 2017 Ford Explorer K8A Police Package V6 Automatic 27,895 223,160 26,821 214,568 25,300 202,400 33,326 266,608 To include: Drivers Side Spot Light Power Door Locks and Windows Rear View Camera Keyless Entry Cloth Front Seats Vinyl Back Seats Rubber Floor A/C and Heat 2 18 Delivery 0 0 437.50 3,500.001 242.00 1,936.00 0 0 3 8 Floor Plan Interest 0 0 0 0 950 7,600.00 0 0 4 1 BuyBoard Fee 0 0 0 400.00 400 400.00 0 0 5 8 Lot Insurance 0 0 0 0 250 2,000.00 0 0 NEENEEM TOTAL:NEEM 223,160 REEM 218,468 EMEM 214,336 EMEM 266,6081 tabulation sheet is to be used by employees to receive quotes from vendors if amount is (TOTAL) less than $50,000.00. If amount exceeds $50,000.00 then C oyees must contact Purchasing & Asset Management to prepare a Formal Bid. Agenda No. 11 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Development Services Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -91 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing a fourth amendment to the interlocal agreement with the Alamo Area Council of Governments ( AACOG) to provide demand - response public transportation. (B. James /B. James) BACKGROUND: Schertz residents benefit from access to ART (Alamo Regional. Transit), the demand- response transit service operated by the Alamo Area Council of Governments ( AACOG). ART makes it possible for the residents that use this service to be independent and improves their quality of life. As a result of the 2010 . Census, Schertz was included in the San Antonio urbanized area. Prior to this designation, ART provided this service to Schertz residents using state and federal funds provided directly to AACOG from the Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT). There was no local match required for this service that ART had been providing to 12 rural counties. With Schertz' inclusion in the San Antonio urbanized area federal funds for transportation services are provided to VIA which are in turn provided by VIA to AACOG to provide this service. In urbanized areas a 50% local match is required. ART provides services for Schertz, Cibolo, New Braunfels, Marion and other areas of Guadalupe County. The amount of matching funds required from Schertz is determined based on the budget to provide the service to all these area and the percent of trips in Schertz. As such, the match amount provided by Schertz varies from year to year. A summary of the costs to provide service with ridership figures and the required local match over the past few years and for 2018. Schertz and AACOG entered into an interlocal agreement for AACOG to provide the ART service in 2013. The agreement is amended annually to establish Schertz' Financial contribution for the upcoming year. A match of $28,872.00 is required this year, which is the same as last year. The City has allocated funds as part of the current budget. Staff is recommending that the City enter into an agreement with AACOG to continue to provide transportation services. Staff has continued discussions with VIA about their long range planning efforts and discussed future transportation needs with TSAC. FISCAL IMPACT For the 2017 -2018 FY, the fiscal impact is $28,872.00. City Council Memorandum Page 2 aIcore V U ► U., Wei 0 Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 17 -R -91 ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 17 -R -91 Resolution 17 -R -91 Initial Interlocal Agreement Fourth Amendment to Interlocal Agreement for City of Schertz Demand- response Route Ridership and Cost Data RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -91 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL AUTHORIZING A FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS ( AACOG) TO PROVIDE FUNDING OF $28,872.00 FOR TRANSIT SERVICES IN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ. WHEREAS the Alamo Area Council of Governments ( AACOG) has been providing transit services to Schertz through the ART program, and WHEREAS in 2013 the City entered into an agreement with AACOG to provide demand response transit services, and WHEREAS, VIA Metropolitan Transit is the designated recipient for Urban Funds which can be used to support this program, and WHEREAS a local match of $28,8721.00 is required for the 2017 -2018 Fiscal Year, WHEREAS AACOG has been designated by VIA as the recipient of funds to continue to provide transit services, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council desires to enter into a third amended agreement with AACOG to provide a match of $28,872.00 to allow the Alamo Area Council of Governments ( AACOG) to continue to provide this transportation service per the agreement attached as per Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. -1- Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of October, 2017. . ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Michael R. Carpenter N Exhibit "A" Third Amendment to the Agreement with AACOG -3- DocuSign Envelope ID: 2123D564 -43AA- 4923- 83DE- 21954791D141 FOURTH AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR City of Schertz Demand - response Route This fourth amendment to the Interlocal Agreement for City of Schertz Demand - response Route (the "Agreement ") is hereby entered into by and between the City of Schertz (the "City ") and the Alamo Area Council of Governments ( "AACOG "), to be effective October 1, 2017. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the City and AACOG entered into that certain interlocal agreement ( "the Agreement "), dated October 1, 2013 in which the City agreed to provide a matching fund payment for demand - response services to AACOG and AACOG agreed to provide demand - response public transportation for the City; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend and revise the Agreement as hereinafter set forth. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties by mutually executing this Fourth Amendment, agree that the Agreement is amended as follows: 1. Add to Section 4.1 a subsection "a" to read as follows: "a. The City's Financial Contribution for Fiscal Year 2018 shall be $28,872." IT IS HEREBY AGREED BY THE PARTIES HERETO, that with the exception of those terms and conditions specifically modified and amended herein, the herein referenced Interlocal Agreement shall remain in full force and effect in all its terms and conditions. EXECUTED the day and year first above written. CITY OF SCHERTZ: ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF By: John Kessel City Manager Date: Page 1 of 1 GOVERNMENTS: kuw By: Diane Rath Executive Director 10/8/2017 Date: Cll'.ty of Schertz FY 201 --,� A`I� October September Tria Puraose Medical Shopping Work Nutrition Other Client Category Under 60 Over 60 Veteran Other: Visit Family YMCA Teddy Burger Center Other locations 1st Q2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q Total Medical: 262 346 394 290 1292 68 80 67 62 277 19 18 13 0 50 31 48 28 0 107 8 22 42 34 106 388 514 544 386 1832 159 178 166 134 637 210 313 357 230 1110 19 23 21 22 85 388 514 544 386 1832 1st Q2nd Q 3rd Q 4th Q Total 8 22 42 34 106 2 0 0 0 2 0 7 24 0 31 0 4 0 0 4 6 11 18 34 69 Live Oak Kidney 58 75 78 78 289 Fresenius New 60 78 78 78 294 Braunfels Schertz Dialysis 42 111 113 38 304 Other: Misc doctor 102 82 125 96 405 appts /Pharmacy Shopping: 68 80 67 62 277 Wal -Mart 46 62 4 48 160 Wal -Mart New Braunfels 6 5 50 2 63 HEB 4 8 10 9 31 Other Stores 12 5 3 3 23 Work: 19 18 13 0 50 Wendy's 19 18 13 0 50 Other work locations 0 0 0 0 0 Nutrition: 31 48 28 0 107 Schertz Senior Center 27 48 28 0 103 Food Pantry 4 0 0 0 4 I FY 2018 Pax Trips Total FTA (VIA) Local Cost per Trip Split Urbanized Area 19,450 $874,074 $437,038 $437,038 $44.94 $22.47 New Braunfels* 90.58% 17,617 $791,708 $395,854 $395,854 $44.94 $22.47 Schertz 6.61% 1,285 $57,744 $28,872 $28,872 $44.94 $22.47 Cibolo 0.37% 72 $3,256 $1,628 $1,628 $44.94 $22.47 Guadalupe Area 1.90% 369 $16,600 $8,300 $8,300 $44.94 $22.47 Marion 0.55% 106 $4,766 $2,383 $2,383 $44.94 $22.47 Total 100.00% 19,450 $874,074 $437,038 $437,038 $44.94 $22.47 *3% increase from FY 2017 projection With Vehicle Capital cost less Fares Updated: 6/19/2017 Agenda No. 12 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Fire Subject: Resolution No. 17-R-95 - HSGP Grant for Fire Equipment Goal Schertz Fire Rescue seeks to use 2017 State Homeland Security Program (HSGP) Grant funds to purchase Hazmat Equipment. Community Benefit This Grant application was approved by Council on February 1.4, 2017. The Office of the Governor recently sent a request for additional wording to be added the Resolution. The main language that needed to be added was that The City of Schertz agrees to return the Grant funds to the Office of the Governor in the event of loss or misuse of the funds. The Grant number was added as well. With these changes to the Resolution, Council needs to once again approve it before we submit it to the Governor's office. Schertz Fire is a founding member of the FEMA Type 111, GuadaComa Emergency Response Group that includes New Braunfels, Seguin, Cibolo, Selma and the Guadalupe, Comal and Bexar county area. The team currently covers 395 square miles of 3 counties ( Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe Counties). The estimated population in this area is approximately 235,000. This group's sole purpose is to jointly mitigate hazardous material incidents to limit the public and commercial impact of such a situation. In addition, SFR participates in numerous mutual aid agreements including regional and statewide responses. Summary of Recommended Action Recommend approval. FISCAL IMPACT Equipment is expected to cost $76,767.47, of which all $76,767.47 will be state funds and no matching City funds will be used. Recommend approval of Resolution No. 17 -R -95 RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -95 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION IN AN AMOUNT UP TO $76,767.47 TO THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNOR, HOMELAND SECURITY DIVISION, FOR THE STATE HOMELAND SECURITY GRANT (HSGP) PROGRAM; AND AUTHORIZING THE ACCEPTANCE OF THE FUNDS, UPON AWARD. WHEREAS, the Office of the Governor, Homeland Security Division (HSD), a program that is designed to enhance the Nation's ability to prevent, respond to; and recover from acts of international terrorism; and WHEREAS, the City Staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City Council authorize the filing of a grant application with the Homeland Security Grant Program relating to Hazmat Equipment for Schertz Fire Department; and WHEREAS, no matching contribution is required; and WHEREAS, The City of Schertz agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Office of the Governor funds, the City of Schertz assures that the funds will be returned to the Office of the Governor in full. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to apply to the Office of the Governor, Homeland Security Division (HSD) for a Homeland Security Grant; THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Manager and his designee are hereby authorized to submit a grant application in an amount not to exceed $76,767.47 to the Office of the Governor to fund the following State Homeland Security Grant (HSGP) Projects: Grant #3235901 - Fire Services Regional Response Capabilities Section 2. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager and/or the emergency manager as the grantee's authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept, reject, alter or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 4. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 8. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of October, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A EQUIPMENT 50459012.1 A -1 Agenda No. 13 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Development Services - Engineering Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -93 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution establishing a public hearing date to consider the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for the designated service areas. (B. James /K. Woodlee) BACKGROUND: Staff has been working with Freese and Nichols, Inc., to update the City's Thoroughfare Plan and develop a roadway impact fee ordinance. A roadway impact fee provides a funding mechanism for the implementation of roadway improvements that add capacity necessitated by new development. The City currently charges water and sewer impact fees. The Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) establishes the process and notification requirements to adopt impact fees. The first step requires City Council to set a date for a public hearing to consider the land uses assumptions and capital improvements plan for the area where impact fees are to be charged. The requested action of City Council is approving the resolution setting the date for the public hearing to consider adopting the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan on November 28, 2017. If Council approves this resolution, staff will publish a notice, as required by the TLGC, indicating the date of the public hearing. Adoption of the two items on November 28 will not create an impact fee. Council and the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) will still have to consider and adopt roadway impact fees and establish the amounts to be collected in each service area. Staff anticipates that being considered by the CIAC on January 10 and in late January. The TLGC outlines a notification and public hearing process for adoption of the impact fee ordinance, which Staff expects to occur in the middle of March. The CIAC recommended a few minor changes be made to the Draft Capital Improvements Plan. An additional change is necessitated by the proposed boundary agreement with Cibolo that is on this agenda for consideration by City Council. The attached version of the Draft Capital Improvements Plan includes the changes recommended by the CIAC and the proposed boundary change. FISCAL IMPACT The cost of set public hearing is the cost of the legal notice of public hearing. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 17 -R -93 City Council Memorandum Page 2 F.,V"., To -. u . Resolution No. 17 -R -93 Draft Legal Notice CIAO Draft Minutes from October 11, 2017 . Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions Report Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Draft Report RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -93 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, SCHEDULING A PUBLIC WEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN UNDER WHICH AN IMPACT FEE MAY BE IMPOSED FOR ROADWAYS WITHIN THE CITY; DIRECTING THE CITY SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF SAID PUBLIC WEARING; AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code, provides procedures for preparing land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan for the consideration of imposing roadway impact fees within the city limits; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has found it necessary and appropriate to employ qualified professionals to prepare land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan for roadway facilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has appointed a Capital Improvements Advisory Committee which is charged to advise the City Council on land use assumptions and on the capital improvements plan for roadway facilities; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Schertz now desires to schedule a public hearing on the land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan for the possible imposition of roadway impact fees in accordance with Chapter 395; now, therefore, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Section 1. In accordance with Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the City Council has employed qualified professionals to prepare land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan for the imposition of roadway impact fees within the City limits. Section 2. The City Council hereby schedules a public hearing on the land use assumptions and roadway capital improvements plan for 6:00 pm, November 28, 2017, at Council. Chambers, 1.400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas. Section 3. The City Secretary is directed to have notice, as attached hereto, of such public hearing published in the San Antonio Express News, on October 27, 2017. The City Secretary is further directed to send notice of hearing by certified mail to any person who has given written notice to the City Secretary requesting notice of such hearing. Section 4. Copies of the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for roadway facilities shall be available to the public at the Office of the City Secretary at City Hall on and after October 27, 2017. Section 5. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 6. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 7. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 8. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 9. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this :Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 10. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 24th day of October, 2017. . ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor M Draft Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN RELATING TO POSSIBLE ADOPTION OF ROADWAY IMPACT FEES Schertz City Hall 6:00 pm, November 28, 2017 The City Council of the City of Schertz will convene a public hearing to consider adoption of land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan under which an impact fee may be imposed for roadway facilities on November 28, 2017, at 6:00 pm in the City Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas 78154. Any member of the public has the right to appear at the public hearing and present evidence for or against the land use assumptions or capital improvements plan. Questions may be directed to Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer (210) 619 -1800. Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Minutes October 11, 2017 The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee convened a Meeting on Wednesday, Oct 11, 2017 . at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Bldg. 4 Schertz, Texas. Members Present: Michael Dahle Richard Braud Ken Greenwald Glen Outlaw Dr. Mark Penshorn Staff Present: Brian James, Executive Director of Development Bryce Cox, Senior Planni Channary Gould, Planner Tiffany Danhof, Executi) Kathryn Woodlee, Direct 1. 2. 3. Call to order by Mr. Dahle called There Items for A. Consider and Capital Improve Members Absent: Ernie Evans Tim Brown i to City Council on the Land Use Assumption Report and the basis for a Roadway Impact Fee. Edmund Haas, Transportation Planning Manager for Freese and Nichols, provided a presentation on the Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee Study, and the Preliminary Capital. Improvements Plan (CIP). There was a discussion among the Committee, the consultant from Freese and Nichols, and staff regarding the projected demand in growth, service area structure, explaining the existing conditions analysis that included an overview of the existing roadway system, carrying capacities, utilization of roadways, and deficiencies. The Committee asked specific questions related to the estimated project pricing in appendix C and how the costs were derived. Mr. Haas responded that the cost estimates are based on unit costing with twelve month averaging in today's prices. There was a brief discussion regarding the total CIP cost and that only a percentage of that cost could be included in the CIP to cover growth over the next ten years. Mr. Haas explained that the remaining portion of the total CIP costs would be rolled forward and factored into future updates. 3. Staff and the consultant also presented the anticipated schedule for future adoption of the road impact fees. There was a brief discussion about the history of impact fees and how they are used. Mr. Haas explained that when the fee portion of the process is evaluated by the Committee, he would provide benchmarking for surrounding and similar sized cities regarding the impact fees they charge. Mr. Outlaw motioned to forward to City Council a recommendation to consider and approve the Land Use Assumption Report and Capital Improvements Plan. Dr. Penshorn seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0. Motion carried. Adjournment. Mr. Dahle adjourned the CIAC joint meeting at 7 Accepted by City Council Date LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Prepared for: City of Schertz 141611TWUll 1 I WAMAIZITI October 2017 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75204 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................... ............................... 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions Report Elements ....................................................... ..............................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... ..............................3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS .................................................................................... ..............................4 3.1 Roadway Service Areas ........................................................................................ ............................... 5 3.2 Data Format ............................................................................................................... ..............................6 4.0 HISTORICAL DATA ..................................................................................................... ..............................7 5.0 BASE YEAR DATA ........................................................................................................ ..............................8 5.1 Population Growth ................................................................................................ ............................... 8 5.2 Population Growth Rate ...................................................................................... ............................... 8 5.3 Additional Growth Indicators ............................................................................. ..............................9 5.4 Existing Land Use .................................................................................................. .............................10 5.5 2017 Employment ................................................................................................ .............................11 6.0 TEN -YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................. ............................... 13 6.1 Population 2027 .................................................................................................... .............................14 6.2 Employment 2027 ................................................................................................ .............................17 7.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... .............................18 1.0 PURPOSE Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate impact fees. An initial step in the impact fee development process is the establishment of land use assumptions which address growth and development for a ten -year planning period (TLGC Section 395.001(5)) for the years 2017 -2027. These land use assumptions, which also include population and employment projections, will become the basis for the preparation of capital improvement plans for roadway facilities. Statutory requirements mandate that impact fees be updated (at least) every five years. This report, in conjunction with the roadway capital improvements plan, form the initial key components of an impact fee program. To assist the City of Schertz in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based upon assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. 1.1 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS REPORT ELEMENTS This report contains the following components: • Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions. • Data Collection Zones and Service Area - Explanation of data collection zones (traffic analysis zones), and division of the city into impact fee service areas for roadway facilities. • Historical Data — Information on historic population trends for Schertz and Guadalupe, Bexar, and Comal Counties. • Base Year Data - Information on population, employment, and land use for Schertz as of 2015 for each roadway service area. • Ten -Year Growth Assumptions - Population and employment growth assumptions for ten years by impact fee service area. • Summary - Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY Based upon the growth assumptions and the capital improvements needed to support growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact upon the entire infrastructure system. The data in this report has been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles for the preparation of impact fee systems in Texas. These land use assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors influencing development patterns, including the following: • The character, type, density, and quantity of existing development • Anticipated future land use (City's Future Land Use Plan Map); • Availability of land for future expansion; • Current and historical growth trends of population and development within the city; • Location and configuration of vacant land; • Growth of employment per the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ( AAMPO); • Known or anticipated development projects within the city, as identified by City Staff. A series of work tasks were undertaken in the development of this report and are described below: 1. A kick -off meeting was held to describe the general methodological approach in the study. 2. Current data of population and housing was collected from the city and other acceptable sources to serve as a basis for future growth. 3. A base year (2017) estimate was developed using city building permit data, U.S. Census and periodic population, household occupancy and household size data, and employment data from AAMPO. 4. A growth rate was determined based upon an analysis of data from recent building permit data, Texas Development Water Board, past growth trends and anticipated development to occur over the next ten -year planning period. A compound annual growth rate of 3.5% is recommended for the planning period. 5. A ten -year projection (2027) was prepared using the recommended growth rate, Staff input, and consideration of the future allocation of population and employment in the AAMPO regional traffic forecast model. Finally, adjustments were then made to consider known or anticipated development activity within the ten -year planning period. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 3 6. Base and ten -year demographics were prepared for the various roadway service areas which, in turn, correlate with the current municipal limits of Schertz. 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE Service areas are required by State Law to define the area served by the Roadway Impact program. Chapter 395 requires that service areas be defined to ensure that facility improvements are located in proximity to the area that is generating needs. Roadway service areas are different from water /wastewater impact fee service areas in that roadway service areas can consider only current city limits but not the extra - territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) while water /wastewater service areas can include both the city limits and ETJ. This is primarily because roadway networks are "open" systems to both local and regional use as opposed to a defined limit of service that is provided within water and wastewater systems. The result is that new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area. Chapter 395 stipulates that roadway service areas be limited to a six -mile maximum dimension, but must be limited to within the current city limits. Although the roadway service areas only recognize current municipal limits, an analysis including the ETJ was conducted in order to consider long -term coverage of the ultimate corporate boundaries relative to the six -mile maximum for the impact fee program. Figure 1 illustrates the roadway impact fee service areas within the ETJ. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 4 3.1 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS Figure 2 illustrates the derived service area structure for roadway facilities. These service areas conform to the current city limits of Schertz. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 5 3.2 DATA FORMAT The existing database, as well as the future projections, was formulated according to the following format and categories: Service Area Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on the attached map. The city limits serve as the roadway service area boundary. Housing Units (2017) All living units including single - family, duplex, multi - family and group quarters existing at the middle of 2017. The number of existing housing units has been estimated for the base year (2017) population estimate. Housing Units (2027) Projected housing units by service zone for the year 2027 (ten -year growth projections). Population (2017) Existing estimated population for the base year (2017). Population (2027) Projected population by service zone for the year 2027 (ten -year growth projection). Employment (2017 -27) Employment data is aggregated to three employment sectors and include Basic, Retail and Service, as provided by AAM PO. These service sectors serve as the basis for nonresidential trip generation. The following details which types of businesses fall within each of the three sectors. Service -- Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance, government, and other professional and administrative offices. Retail -- Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. Basic -- Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those that are exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing and other industrial uses. AAMPO prepares employment estimates at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level, but some adjustments were needed to consider areas within the limits of the city. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 6 Figure 3: Historic Population Growth; City of Schertz, Comal County and Guadalupe County, and Bexar County 35,000 30,0(}0 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,OW Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. HISTORICAL Schertz is located approximately 16 miles northeast of downtown San Antonio and lies in Guadalupe, Bexar, and Comal Counties. Over the past several years, the Alamo Area region has experienced steady population and employment growth. Figure 3 depicts the historic population growth for the City of Schertz and Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties. Comal and Guadalupe Counties have maintained steady growth over the last 40 years with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) around 3.5 percent. Meanwhile, Bexar County, which encompasses the City of San Antonio has maintained a slower growth rate of 1.8 percent. The City of Schertz's population statistics begin in 1990. Between 1990 and 2010, population growth was steady with a CAGR between 3.5 and 4.5 percent. All indicators suggest that the city and regional population growth will continue in the near future. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 7 5.0 BASE YEAR T This section provides information and documents the data used to derive the 2017 base year population estimate for the City of Schertz. 5.1 POPULATION GROWTH One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. Schertz has experienced steady growth over the past decade. Past growth trends from the U.S. Census were examined in conjunction with single family building permit data from the city (Figure 4). The city estimates a 2016 population estimate of 39,453 residents in Schertz using the U.S. Census Intercensal population data of previous years. 5.2 POPULATION GROWTH RATE A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) allows for a general assessment of growth, considering periodic increases and decreases in residential population growth coinciding with changing economic conditions. Various sources were used to derive past growth rates (Table 1). These sources indicated rates of growth between 2.6 and 4.1 percent. Based upon this data, analysis Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. Figure 4: Schertz Population Growth Trends Table 1: Growth Rates Source Growth U.S. Census (5- Year)* 3.4% U.S. Census (10- Year) ** 3.5% Future Growth Projection 3.5% *CAGR Based on 2011 -2016 Intercensal Data * *CAGR Based on 2006 -2016 Intercensal Data Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 8 Figure 5: Historic New Building Permits Source: City of Schertz Building Permits Table 2. Regional Growth Comparison Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. of 10 -year forecasts, and City Staff input, a 3.5 percent compound annual growth rate was determined to be an appropriate assumption for the 10 -year study period. It is believed to account for periods of rapid and stable growth expected to occur in the future. This rate was recommended by the Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee on May 13, 2015. 5.3 ADDITIONAL GROWTH INDICATORS Residential building permit data is also an indicator of recent growth trends. Cumulative single family residential building permits issued since 2000 are shown in Figure S. Annual single family residential building permits are shown to the left, depicting the overall trend in annual permits. Although building permits issued decreased after 2003, the issuance has remained steady over the last few of years. From 2011 to 2016, the trend shows a rate that will maintain permit issuance and growth in the future. Local population projections shown in Table 2 indicate that growth will continue in Schertz in the future. These population projections from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), City of Schertz Parks Plan and City of Schertz Population Projections indicate robust growth is likely and will continue for the next 35 years. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 9 5.4 EXISTING LAND USE In any evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, a documentation of existing conditions is essential. Analysis of existing land use patterns was prepared based on Schertz's 2013 Sector Plan and 2002 Comprehensive Plan, which includes current city limits and the ET1. This also serves to document the present physical condition of the city with regard to any infrastructure deficiencies that may exist. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 10 5.5 2017 EMPLOYMENT 2017 base employment was calculated using data from AAMPO. This information provided a breakout of employment by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for 2010. Figure 6 shows the location of the TAZs in each service area. For assumption purposes, these numbers were grown uniformly with specific adjustments made to TAZs to match estimates provided bythe city. It is important to note that the TAZs do not follow city limits in some locations, so adjustments were made based on the locations of existing land uses and upon the percentage of each TAZ located within city limits. AAMPO employment data was categorized as basic, retail, and service (see page 6 for a description of the employment categories). Using this data, the total employment could be found for basic, retail and service businesses in each service area (SA). Table 3 details 2017 employment within Schertz's city limits for each TAZ. Table 3. 2017 Employment by Service Area Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 11 r � "s. ✓ �� f 1 0� 1144 / 114$ �` ✓" 770 # 1112 '4 1r 1121"' "° ` 5 i� �� 1143 tu'@ t � 1106, of ° ?71 F 1113 1457 E 11 2 '�� X y 7111$ 4 1 1145 ; 2a 1088 E` ' 772'x' 7 ?81 1123 4 tm�°�� 1167 i�� �,..,� 10 9. a 1124 y �. 1144 101` caw w J 524 W!" 1116 » ,„ . ` f ;,1125 1 95 kt� _ N COMNtNdCtv.9ERMCGr: grrPGR%4NITY 5 Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. 779*'° rzwr rxnrox:r.�xrxu+o` "0" �. rt1;1',,„� 1094 778 1^780 w ^ ' �� , .� S�bow y,,aar 1140 4 d' i Service Areas e as 2 Excludetl from IFEE dl 2(ETJ) Excluded from IFEE IETJ) r 7$5 0 1 2 3_ t Miles ;. S FN J08 N0 SRZ1535fi 2017 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee , eArras,m:m GATE September s,l 7 6 SCALE 1:80,000 Traffic Analysis Zones Figure °RAFTS° Dare Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 12 6.0 TEN-YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS Projected growth has been characterized in two forms: population and employment. A series of assumptions were made to arrive at reasonable growth rates for population and employment. The following assumptions have been made as a basis from which ten -year projections could be initiated. • Future land uses will occur based on similar trends of the past and consistent with the Future Land Use Plan Map, • The city will be able to finance the necessary improvements to accommodate growth, • School facilities will accommodate increases in population, and • Densities will be as projected in the Sector Plans. The ten -year projections are based upon the 3.5 percent growth rate discussed earlier and considers past trends of the city. This rate corresponds with the historical average growth rate and the amount of growth expected over the next ten years. Table 4 details the ten -year population projection. Table 4. Year 2017 and 2027 Service Area Population and Dwelling Units Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 13 6.1 POPULATION 2027 The city has experienced steady growth over the past decade. The city's 2000 population stood at just over 18,000 residents. By the end of the decade, Schertz's population neared 32,000 in 2010 and a current 2017 estimate of 40,339. Although population estimates from the ETJ cannot be taken into account when calculating land use assumptions, the growing population within the ETJ should be monitored as the city plans its future. Using a 3.5 percent compound annual growth rate, the projected 2027 population for the city is 56,902 (Figure 7). Figure 7: Ten -Year Population Growth Projection Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 14 Table 5: Projected Dwelling Unit Estimations Avg. No. of Annual Permits: 581 Building permit calculations were derived using the U.S. Census information of 2.85 persons per household and base year population estimate. Between 2004 and 2014, the city issued an average of 377 building permits a year with the highest number of permits, 535, being issued in 2005 and the lowest number of permits, 254, issued in 2012. The city may average 581 new dwelling units a year over the next ten -year period (Table 5 and Figure 8). This average number is reflective of the type of construction which would likely occur based upon population projections and are accounting for both single - family and multi - family construction. Figure 8: Projected Dwelling Unit Estimations Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 15 An additional factor affecting overall population growth within Schertz is the construction of The Crossvine, a planned development in the southern sector of Schertz east of FM 1518. The master plan for this area includes between 2,300 and 2,400 single - family homes. The Crossvine Development The City has been reviewing its Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Plan in the area to the west of the Crossvine. This area is south of Randolph Air Force Base and is impacted by restrictions based on the Air Impact Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) as outlined in the Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph Joint Land Use Study (JLUS). The recently updated JBSA Randolph JLUS recommends significantly reduced residential densities for this area. Additionally, a lack of sewer capacity and concerns about allowing septic systems on half acre lots will likely reduce densities in this area from what is designated on the Future Land Use Plan. As sewer capacity is provided to the area to the east of FM 1518 pressure for corresponding increases in densities will likely continue to be experienced. Continuing residential development pressure in the northern part of Schertz, along IH -35 as well as pressure along IH -35 from New Braunfels in the north will impact the distribution of development, resulting in population and employment growth, around the City. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 16 6.2 EMPLOYMENT 2027 Employment data for the year 2027 was based upon data provided by AAMPO and the City of Schertz. Data from AAMPO in the years 2025 and 2040 was used to interpolate the projected year 2027. The data was then adjusted to match growth rate and allocation expectations by the City. The 2027 employment by TAZ as listed in Table 6. It is important to note that TAZs do not follow city limits. City Staff input was received to verify employment assumptions in each TAZ regarding known or anticipated development to occur, projections of future land use needs and employee projections within each TAZ located within city limits. The employment numbers in Table 6 show the derived employment of each TAZ within Schertz's municipal boundary. Over 5,000 jobs are forecasted to be added to the city over the ten -year planning period and represents an increase of 45 percent. This increase corresponds to an annual growth rate of 3.8 percent. Table 6. 2025 Employment by Service Area Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 17 7.0 SUMMARY • The existing 2017 population for Schertz stands at approximately 40,339 persons, with an existing estimated employment of 11,201 jobs. • An average annual growth rate of 3.5 percent was used to calculate the Schertz ten -year growth projections. This growth rate is based upon the State Water Board Projections, the Parks Plan, City forecasts, historical U.S. Census data, as well as Building Permit information received from the City. • Ten -year (2027) population growth is forecasted to be 56,902 persons, with an employment of 16,247 jobs. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 18 Table 7. Land Use Assumptions 2017 -2027 Summary Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 19 'Population Schertz Total 44;5 56,9f}2 16;a6 3.Si Service Area 1 9,239 12,211 2,972 2.8% Service Area 2 28,280 32,169 3,889 1.3% Service Area 3 2,809 12,454 9,645 16.1% Servi c Area 4 11 68 57 20.0% Dwelling Units; Schertz Total 14,407 24;322 Service Area 1 3,300 4,361 1,061 2.8% Service Area 2 10,100 11,489 1,389 1.3% Service Area 3 1,003 4,448 3,445 16.1% Service Area 4 4 24 20 20.0% Employment 5chertzTotal 11,201. 16,247 :5,046 3: Service Area 1 2,206 3,812 1,606 5.6% Basic 1,120 1,814 694 4.9% Reta i 1 468 785 317 5.3% Service 618 1,213 595 7.0% Servi ceArea 2 8,587 11,304 2,717 2.8% Basic 3,287 5,038 1,751 4.4% Reta i 1 2,449 2,996 547 2.0% Service 2,851 3,270 419 1.4% Servi ceArea 3 408 1,111 703 103% Basic 232 597 365 9.9% Reta i 1 108 340 232 12.2% Service 68 174 106 9.9% Servi c Area 4 0 20 20 Basic 0 0 0 - Reta i 1 0 0 0 - Service 0 20 20 - Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 19 Roadway Impact Fee Study Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Prepared for: City of Schertz October 2017 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75204 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... ............................... 2 1.1 Capital Improvements Plan Elements ............................................................. ..............................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... ..............................3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS .................................................................................... ..............................4 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS ....................................................................... ..............................4 4.1 Existing Volumes ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 4.2 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Capacity Supply .................................................... ............................... 6 4.3 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Demand ................................................................... ............................... 6 4.4 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies .................. ............................... 7 5.0 GROWTH PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................7 5.1 Projected Vehicle -Miles of New Demand ....................................................... ..............................9 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ......................................................................... ..............................9 6.1 Eligible Projects ..................................................................................................... .............................10 6.2 Eligible Costs ........................................................................................................... .............................10 6.3 Impact Fee CIP ........................................................................................................ .............................12 APPENDIX................................................................................................................................ .............................17 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. Legislative mandate requires that a capital improvements plan (CIP) be prepared that addresses long -term growth and that such plan be approved by the governing body prior to a public hearing for the consideration of imposing an impact fee. This report details the development of the impact fee CIP. As a funding mechanism for roadway improvements, impact fees allow cities to recover the costs associated with new facilities or expansions in order to serve future development. Legislatively, roadway impact fees may consider arterial and collector status roads on the City's official Master Thoroughfare Plan. Statutory requirements mandate that impact fees be based on a specific list of improvements identified in the program and only the cost attributed (and necessitated) by new growth over a ten -year period may be considered. As projects in the program are completed, planned costs are updated with actual costs to more accurately reflect the capital expenditure of the program. Additionally, new capital improvement projects may be added to the program. 1.1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ELEMENTS This report contains the following components: • Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the capital improvements plan. • Service Area Structure - Explanation and division of the City into impact fee service areas for roadway facilities. • Existing Conditions Analysis — Analysis of the existing roadway system; its carrying capacity, current utilization, and deficiencies. • Growth Projections— Development of growth projections to occur over the ten -year planning period by service area. • Capital Improvements Plan — Description of the capital improvements plan and costing. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY The impact fee capital improvements plan is predicated on community growth forecasted over a ten -year planning period. The Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Report, prepared as part of this study process, serves as the basis for the determination of "growth attributable to new development ". The LUA examines growth in terms of population and employment, and are based on recent trends the city has experienced since the early 2000s and reflect the changing dynamics of residential and non - residential growth in the city. Information contained in the report is based upon analysis of data from the U.S. Census, regional and local growth trends, housing permits and known /anticipated development from recent city approvals. These land use assumptions serve as a key component from which impact fees are calculated. For the formulation of the capital improvements plan, a series of work tasks were undertaken and are described below. 1. Meetings were held with City Staff to discuss impact fee methodology, project criteria and eligibility, and cost eligibility for consideration in the study. 2. Roadway service areas were developed to ensure conformity with legislative mandate, as well as amended to allow for city annexations. 3. Vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) in the PM peak hour was identified as the service unit of measure for analyses and impact fee calculations. 4. A roadway inventory was conducted to document lane geometrics, roadway functional classification, and system capacity. Traffic volume count data were collected in May 2015 to determine roadway utilization, and if any capacity deficiencies exist within each impact fee service area. Traffic volume counts were conducted at 30 locations throughout the city. 5. Projected 10 -year growth was calculated for service areas based on land use assumptions (projections of population and employment growth) and translated into residential, office, commercial and industrial VMT using service unit equivalencies. Trip rate data was obtained from Trip Generation, Ninth Edition by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and trip length statistics for Schertz were obtained from the travel demand model used in the 2017 Schertz Master Thoroughfare Plan Study. 6. A capital improvements plan to address projected growth was developed and separated by service area. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS Service areas are required by State Law to define an area to be served by impact fee capital improvements. Legislative requirements stipulate that roadway service areas be limited to a six -mile maximum and must be located within the current city limits. The result is that, for roadways, new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area and within city limits. A service area structure consisting of four zones has been developed for Schertz and correlates with the current corporate boundaries, as depicted in Figure 1. An inventory of major roadways that are designated as arterial and /or collector facilities on the Master Thoroughfare Plan was conducted to determine: 1) capacity provided by the existing roadway system, 2) the demand currently placed on the system, and 3) the potential existence of deficiencies on the system. Any deficiencies found to occur will be carried over in the impact fee calculations (netting out capacity made available by the CIP). Data for the inventory was obtained from the Master Thoroughfare Plan, field reconnaissance, and peak hour traffic volume count data. The roadways were divided into segments based on changes in lane configuration, major intersections, city limits or area development that may influence roadway characteristics. For the assessment of individual segments, lane capacities were assigned to each segment based on roadway functional class defined by the Master Thoroughfare Plan and type of existing cross - section, as listed in Table 1. Roadway hourly volume capacities are based on general carrying capacity values and reflect level -of- service (LOS) "D" operation based upon generally accepted capacities as defined in AAMPO planning references, which has been identified as the minimum acceptable traffic operational condition by cities. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 4 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 5 TABLE 1. ROADWAY FACILITY VEHICLE -MILE LANE CAPACITIES Divided Arterial* DA 675 Divided Collector* DC 550 Undivided Arterial UA 625 Undivided Collector UC 500 *Facilities with a two -way left turn lane (TWLTL) treated as a divided facility and marked with a Special Arterial (SA) or Special Collector (SC) designation. 4.1 EXISTING VOLUMES Existing directional PM peak hour volumes were obtained from automated traffic counts conducted in May 2015. Automated traffic counts at 30 separate locations were collected on major roadways throughout the city. In an effort to minimize the total number of counts, data was collected at locations where traffic volumes would typify link volumes on the major segments within the immediate area. For segments not counted, existing volumes were used or estimates were developed based on data from adjoining roadway counts. This data was compiled for roadway segments throughout the city and entered into the database for use in calculations. A summary of volumes by roadway segment is included in the Appendix A as part of the existing capital improvements database. V 1_ ► ''' " _ An analysis of the total capacity for each service area was performed. For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle -miles of capacity supplied were calculated using the following: Vehicle -Miles of Capacity = Link capacity per peak hour per lane x No. of Lanes x Length of segment (miles) A summary of the current capacity available on the roadway system by service area is detailed below. �CIt�I�l. l[ �11IduIIIf�Yllli� ►:1��IY1►�[!l17�luI:�►�17 The level of current usage in terms of vehicle -miles was calculated for each roadway segment. The vehicle- miles of existing demand were calculated by the following equation: Vehicle -Miles of Demand = PM peak hour volume x Length of segment (miles) The total vehicle -miles of demand by service area is also listed below. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 6 4.4 VEHICLE -MILES OF EXISTING EXCESS CAPACITY AND DEFICIENCIES For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle -miles of excess capacity and /or deficiencies were calculated and are listed in Table 2. Each direction was evaluated to determine if vehicle demands exceeded the available capacity. If demand exceeded capacity in one or both directions, the deficiency is deducted from the supply associated with the impact fee capital improvement plan. A summary of peak hour excess capacity and deficiencies is also shown in the table. Any deficiencies identified under current operations will be carried over to the impact fee calculation. A detailed listing of existing excess capacity and deficiencies by roadway segment is also located in the Appendix A. TABLE 2. PEAK HOUR VEHICLE -MILES OF EXISTING CAPACITY, DEMAND, EXCESS CAPACITY AND DEFICIENCIES 1 12,708 2,938 10,047 277 2 37,321 20,846 16,690 215 3 15,917 7,479 9,067 629 4 1,478 130 1,348 0 Total 67,424 31,393 37,151 1,121 5.0 GROWTH PROJECTIONS The projected growth for the roadway service area is represented by the increase in the number of new vehicle -miles of demand generated over the 10 -year planning period. The basis for the calculation of new demand is the population and employment projections that were prepared as part of the Schertz Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Report for Impact Fees dated October 2017 by Freese and Nichols with a growth rate approved by the Schertz CIAC on May 13, 2015. Estimates of population and employment were prepared for the years 2017 and 2027. Population data was provided in terms of the number of dwelling units and persons. Employment data was broken into three classes of employees that include basic, retail and service, comprising a variety of employment groupings. Basic employment generally encompasses the industrial and manufacturing uses; retail employment includes commercial and retail uses; and service employment generally encompasses government and office uses. A summary of the projected growth is summarized below. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 7 TABLE 3. PROJECTED 10 -YEAR DEMOGRAPHIC GROWTH SUMMARY � l I t� i 4� �I t• i t � t t t M i � at � 1 t Source: FNI; October 2017 Land Use Assumptions Report Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 8 5.1 PROJECTED VEHICLE -MILES OF NEW DEMAND Projected vehicle -miles of demand were calculated based on the net growth expected to occur over the 10 -year planning period, and on the associated service unit generation for each of the population and employment data components (basic, service and retail). Separate calculations were performed for each data component and were then aggregated for each service area. Vehicle -miles of demand for population growth were based on dwelling units (residential). Vehicle -miles of demand for employment were based on the number of employees, and then converted to square footage of building space using estimates of square footage per employee for industrial, office and retail uses. The 10 -year projected vehicle -miles of demand by service area are summarized in Table 4. The Appendix B details the derivation of the projected demand calculations. TABLE 4. 10 -YEAR PROTECTED SERVICE UNITS OF DEMAND 1 10,461 2 17,905 3 14,918 4 124 Total 43,408 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The impact fee CIP is aimed at facilitating long -term growth in Schertz. The City has identified the City- funded transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The CIP for Roadway Impact Fees is made up of: • Recently completed projects with excess capacity available to serve new growth; • Projects currently under construction; and • Remaining projects needed to complete the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. All arterial and collector facilities in the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan not to the ultimate build -out were included in the impact fee CIP to provide flexibility in the development of the community due to currently rapid rates of development. The only exception is the FM 3009 extension which was excluded due to the high cost and undetermined scope and timing of the project. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 9 Subsequent to this report on the development of the impact fee CIP, the final report will detail project cost per service unit, the cost attributable to new development, and service area cost per service unit. 6.1 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS Legislative mandate stipulates that the impact fee CIP contain only those roadways which are included on the City's official Master Thoroughfare Plan that are classified as arterial or collector status facilities. Impact fee legislation also allows for the recoupment of costs for previously constructed facilities and projects currently under construction; however, after consideration, none of the projects were included for recoupment. All of these projects conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan requirements and will consider only the costs incurred by the City for facility implementation. 6.2 ELIGIBLE COSTS In general, those costs associated with the design, right -of -way acquisition, and construction and financing of all items necessary to implement the roadway projects identified in the capital improvements plan are eligible. These estimates are based on the ultimate roadway section identified by functional classification in the 2017 Master Thoroughfare Plan Report with an excerpt of these assumed sections in the Appendix E. It is important to note that upon completion of the capital improvements identified in the CIP, the city must recalculate the impact fee using the actual costs and make refunds if the actual cost is less than the impact fee paid by greater than 10 percent. To prevent this situation, conservative (low) estimates of project cost are considered. Chapter 395.012 identifies roadway costs eligible for impact fee recovery. The law states that: "An impact fee may be imposed only to pay the cost of constructing capital improvements for facility expansions, including and limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees; and fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." "Projected interest charges and other finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 10 to reimburse bond funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan." The following details the individual cost components of the impact fee CIP. Construction: Construction costs include those costs which are normally associated with construction, including: paving, dirt work (including sub -grade preparation, embankment fill and excavation), clearing and grubbing, retaining walls or other slope protection measures, and general drainage items which are necessary in order to build the roadway and allow the roadway to fulfill its vehicle carrying capability. Individual items may include; bridges, culverts, inlets and storm sewers, junction boxes, manholes, curbs and /or gutters, and channel linings and other erosion protection appurtenances. Other items included in cost estimates may include: sidewalks, traffic control devices at select locations (initial cost only), ancillary adjustments to existing utilities, and minimal sodding /landscaping. Engineering: These are the costs associated with the design and surveying necessary to construct the roadway. Because the law specifically references fees, it has generally been understood that in -house City design and surveying cannot be included. Only those services that are contracted out can be included and it may be necessary to use outside design and surveying firms to perform the work. For planned projects, a percentage based on typical engineering contracts was used to estimate these fees. Right -of -Way: Any land acquisition cost estimated to be necessary to construct a roadway can be included in the cost estimate. For planning purposes, only the additional amount of land needed to bring a roadway right -of -way to thoroughfare standard was considered. For example, if a 120' right -of -way for an arterial road was needed and 80' of right -of -way currently existed, only 40' would be considered in the acquisition cost. The cost for right -of -way may vary based on location of project and will be based on data from the most current County Appraisal District data. Debt Service: Predicted interest charges and finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principle and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by the city to finance capital improvements identified in the impact fee capital improvements plans. They cannot be used to reimburse bond funds for Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 11 other facilities. This cost will be determined through a Finance Study and incorporated in the final impact fee cost per service unit calculation. Previous Assessments: The cost for any previous assessments collected by the City on projects identified on the impact fee CIP must be removed from program consideration. As this is a new impact fee program, there are no previous assessments to consider in the initial calculation. Study Updates: The fees paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision can be included in the impact fees. Only the cost necessitated by new development will be considered for impact fee consideration. For example, if only 60% of the capacity provided by the impact fee CIP is needed over the ten -year window, then only 60% of the cost associated with those facilities will be considered. This can be seen in Service Area 1 as another example, where net capacity supplied by the CIP is 42,189 vehicle -miles (Table 5) while the projected demand is 10,461 vehicle -miles (Table 4). Therefore, only the portion of cost attributed to the projected demand, 24.8 percent, is considered in the impact fee cost per service unit calculation in the next phase of the study's Impact Fee Report. This calculation is shown for each service area in Table 6. 6.3 IMPACT FEE CIP The proposed CIP consists of 71 project segments over the four service areas and entail the buildout of the full Master Thoroughfare Plan network, as seen in Figure 2. By including the full network, there is flexibility in the impact fee program funds to adapt to development needs and ensure credit is given to developers building thoroughfare roadways. The capacity and net capacity provided by the proposed CIP is summarized below in Table S. Net capacity provided by the proposed CIP takes into consideration current traffic on CIP roads and any deficiencies from the existing conditions analysis described in Section 4 of this report. A detailed listing by project of capacity supplied can be found in the Appendix C. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 12 TABLE 5. CAPACITY AND NET CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE PROPOSED CIP 1 45,213 2,747 42,466 277 42,189 2 25,210 6,998 18,212 215 17,996 3 46,511 7,305 39,206 629 38,577 4 3,359 130 3,229 0 3,229 Total 120,292 17,181 103,111 1,121 101,991 A comparison of net capacity provided by the proposed CIP relative to 10 -year needs (developed in Section 5) is listed below in Table 6. An analysis reveals an adequately matched overall impact fee CIP program to address growth attributable to new development. TABLE 6. PROJECTED DEMAND AND NET CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE PROPOSED CIP Project costs were developed based on unit cost estimates compiled by Freese and Nichols. Individual project costs were developed for engineering, right -of -way, and construction, as found in the Appendix D. Each roadway segment uses the Master Thoroughfare Plan's defined functional classification to determine the ultimate roadway standard for each link. Additionally, impact fee study update costs were attributed to the project costs. For recently completed projects, actual costs must be input to meet legislative mandates, but no completed projects were included in this initial impact fee program. The cost for the preliminary IFCIP program totals approximately $228.9 million, excluding debt service. Debt service costs will be determined in the Finance Study as part of the cost per service unit calculation analysis. Figure 2 and Table 7 illustrate and list the capital improvement projects and their associated total cost for the impact fee program. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 13 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 14 Sery Area Project No. Roadway From TO Project Status Length (m it No. Of Type Lanes Rdwy Thoroughfare Plan Description Pot. in Serv. Area Total Project Cost I I FM 2252 IH 35 FM 482 New 0.32 4 DA Principe] Arterial 100% $1,566,800 1 2 FM 2252 DO 482 Railroad Tracks New 0,64 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,146,000 IV( 3 FM 2252 Railroad Tracks N City Limits New 0.22 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $509,850 112 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $3,202,650 1 5 E/W Connector (1) NIS Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $5,513,000 1 6 E/W Connector (2) NIS Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $4,269,000 1 7 Fly 482 FIN 2252 Hubertus Rd New 1.05 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,456,100 1 8 FM 482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks New 1.00 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,147,800 1 9 FM 482 800' W of Fresenhahn Friesereahn Ln New 0.15 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $754,100 I/X 10 FM 482 Fresenharin Ln Schwab Rd New 0.59 4 DA Principal Arterial 50% $1,530,000 1 11 FM 482 Schwab Rd E City Limits New 1.20 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $6,205,500 1 12 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.57 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $2,855,700 1 13 Hubertus Rd FM 482 IN City Limits New 0.30 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $1,572,300 1 14 Fnesenhahn Ln D 35 FM 482 New 0.72 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,343,600 1 15 Schwab Rd 1H 35 FIN 482 New 0.63 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $4,374,700 1 16 E/W Connector (3) Hubertus Rd David Lack Blad New 1.59 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $6,110,000 1 17 Eckhardt Rd Froboese Ln Green Valley Rd New 1.11 2 DO Residential Collector 100% $3,727,100 1 18 Schwab Rd IH 35 S City Limits New 1.14 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $5,680,700 1 19 Froboese Ln Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0,57 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $2,030,400 1 20 Froboese Ln 2200'E of Eckhardt E City Limits New 0,26 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $890,000 1 21 Green Valley Rd W City Limits E City Limits New 0.87 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,199,500 1 22 Homestead Pkwy End Ex Homestead Pkwy S City Limits New 0.33 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,178,500 1 23 Country Club Blwl Scenic Links S City Limits New 0.35 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,257,100 1 24 E/W Connector (4) Country Club BlwJ Homestead Pkwy New 0.77 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $2,671,200 1 25 E/W Connector (4) Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.45 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,602,000 1 26 FIN 1103 11135 Old Wiederstain Rd New 0.70 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $2,000,000 1 27 NIS Connector (1) D 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $2,667,000 1 28 NIS Connector (2) IH 35 Old Waderstem Rd New 0.73 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,635,700 1 29 E/W Connector (5) N/S Connector (1) FM 1103 New 2.00 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $7,097,200 I/X 30 Old Guederstein Rd N/S Connector (1) Cherry Of New 2.17 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $5,143,600 Sub-total SA 1 24.22 $97,337,100 2 31 Doerr Ln N City Limits Lookout Rd New 0.91 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $3,249,900 2/1 4 NIS Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $3,130,900 2 32 E/W Connector (2) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $3,386,200 2 33 E/W Connector (6) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $3,386,100 2 34 Mid-Cities Pkwy D 35 FM 3009 New 0.98 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $3,293,700 2 35 E/W Connector (1) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,190,900 2 36 E/W Connector (7) W City Limits Doerr Ln New 0.65 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $2,231,100 2 37 Lookout Rd Tri-County Pkwy Schanz Pkwy New 0.74 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $2,743,600 2 38 Four Oaks Ln End of Ex .Four Oaks Ln NIS Connector (1) New 0.54 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,977,300 2 39 Wrederstren Rd E City Limits FM 3009 New 0.64 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,079,800 2 40 Wiederstep Rd Schertz Pkwy IN City Limits New 0.41 2 DO Residential Collector 100% $1,294,700 2 41 Baptist Health Dr Ripps-Kreusler Wiederstem Rd New 0.27 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $992,900 2 42 Ripps-Kreusler Baptist Health Dr End of Rippe Kreurser New 0.22 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $803,900 2 43 Maske Rd FIN 1518 Oak St New 0.54 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,827,600 2 44 Masks Rd Realignment Oak St Schertz Pkwy New 0.88 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $3,645,200 2 45 FM 1518/Mad St Maske Rd Oak St New 1.30 3 SA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,494,500 2 46 FM 1518 N City Limits SA 3 Limit New 0.36 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $436,300 2/3 47 FIR 1518 SA 3 Limit Schanz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA Principal Arterial 50% $222,650 2 48 FM 78/John Peterson Blvd VY-CIN Imits a-L- -Its E-CA W-W-M New 1.81 6 DA Precool Arterial 100% $2,683,780 Sub-total SA 2 14.34 $47,071,030 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 15 TABLE 7. IMPACT FEE CIP LISTING (CONTINUED) Sew Area Project No. Roadway From To Project Status Length (m f) No. of Type Lanes Rdwy Thoroughfare Plan Description Pct. in Sew. Area Total Project Cost 3/2 47 FM 1518 SA 2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA Principal Arterial 50% $222,650 3 49 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext. IH 10 New 4.09 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,165,000 3 50 Schaefer Rd W City Limits FM 1518 New 0.48 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $1,536,700 3/X 51 RAF - Bumette Schaefer Rd E City Limits New 0.55 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $1,279,500 3/X 52 Lower Seguin Rd W City limits E of Tates Dr New 0.35 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $686,450 3 53 Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Or W of Canopy Bend New 1.76 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $6,998,900 3 54 Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.72 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $7,860,400 3 55 N/S Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.15 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $764,000 3 56 NIS Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.27 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $1,380,400 3 57 NIS Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.26 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $894,600 3 58 NIS Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.21 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $725,000 3/X 59 W Ware Seguin Rd W City Limits Boeing Dr New 0.57 2 UC Residential Collector 50% $900,550 3 60 W Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Dr NIS Connector (5) New 0.67 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $2,236,900 3 61 NIS Connector (5) Lower Seguin Rd W Ware Seguin Rd New 1.10 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $3,780,500 3 62 N/S Connector (5) W Ware Seguin Rd E Ware Seguin Rd New 0.93 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $3,227,400 3 63 Trainer Hale Rd (NIS) Weir Rd IH 10 New 1.66 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $8,020,500 3 64 Trainer Hale Rd (E /W) FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd (NIS) New 1.51 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $7,710,300 3 65 Ware Seguin Rd Graytown Rd NIS Connector (5) New 135 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,736,300 3 66 E Ware Seguin Rd NIS Connector (5) FM 1518 New 1.41 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,739,900 3/4 67 Graybwn Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $2,000,600 3 68 NIS Connector (6) Ware Seguin Rd lH 10 New 0.47 3 SC Commercial Collector 100% $1,712,600 3 69 E/W Connector 3) IH 10 E City Limits New 2.33 3 SC Commercial Collector 100% $8482300 Sub -total SA 3 23.33 $75,061,450 4/3 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr 11110 New 1.11 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $2,000,600 4 70 Binz - Engleman Rd W City limits Graytown Rd New 1.30 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,667,000 4 71 Scenic Lake Dr Binz- Engleman Rd IH 10 New 0.77 3 SC Commercial Collector A 100% $2.777,400 Sub -total SA 4 3.19 $9,445,000 Totals: 65.08 ( $228,914,580 Totals: Engineering Cost Right -of -Way Cost Construction Cost $14,149,150 $10,633,600 ,204,131.830 TOTAL NET COST $228,914,580 Future Impact Fee Update Cost' $100,000 TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION COST $229,014,580 Notes: DA- DiNded arterial Recoup- Recoupment Project SA- Special arterial (with two way left turn lane) New - New Project SC- Special collector (with two way left turn lane) ' Cost for (2) 5 year updates UC- Undivided collector `/X indcates roadway half in /half out of City Limits indicates roadway split between two seMce areas Capital Improvements Plan Freese and Nichols, Inc. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 16 APPENDIX Appendix A: Existing Conditions Analysis Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Capital improvements Analysis Sery Area Roadway From To A B Length No. of (m j) Lanes Type C Lane CapacityServ. Pct. in Peak Hour Area A D Volume B Total Ax BxC VMT Supply P, Hr Total AxD VMT Demand :f Pk Hr Total Excess TotalVMT Capacity Total VMT: Deficiency. 1 FM2252 IH 35 Railroad Tracks 0.87 2 UA 625 100% 73 250 323 1084 280 804: 0 1/X FM2252 Railroad Tracks NCity Limits 0.22 2 UA 625 50% 0 250 250 138 55 83 0' 1 FM482 FM2252 Hubertus Rd 1.05 2 U 625 100% 46 52 98 1315 103 `. 1212 104 1 FM482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks 1.00 2 UA 625 1001 46 52 98 1252 98 1154' So`: 1 FM482 Railroad Tracks Friesenhahn Ln 0.18 2 UA 625 100% 46 52 98 222 17 204` 0 1/X FM482 Friesenhahn Ln ECity Limits 0.59 2 UA 625 50% 46 0 46 369 27 `. 342` '0< 1 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM482 0.57 2 U 625 100% 30 57 87 708 49 659 -0'. 1 Friesenhahn Ln IH 35 FM482 0.72 2 UC 500 100% 50 50 100 717 72 6451 !:0' 1 Schwab Rd IH 35 Railroad Tracks 0.53 3 SA 675 100% 120 315 435 721 232 > 489 '.`0 1 Eckhardt Rd IH 35 S City Limits 1.17 2 UA 625 100% 19 11 30 1466 35 1431 0 1 Schwab Rd IH 35 End of Schwab Rd 0.36 2 UA 625 100% 3 2 5 454 2 452. 0 1 Country Club Blvd IH 35 Northcliffe Golf Club 0.46 2 D 550 100% 50 50 100 507 46 461 is 0:` 1 Country Club Blvd Northcliffe Golf Club End of Ex Country Club'. 0.39 2 D 550 100% 50 50 100 434 39 395' :0 1 FM 1103 IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.70 2 UA 625 100% 590 1020 1610 877 1129 25 277: 1 Belmont Pkwy IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.74 2 UC 500 100% 20 20 40 739 30 710 <0 1/X Old Wiederstein Rd Cibolo Valley Dr Cherry Tree Dr 2.17 2 U 625 50% 0 177 177 1356 384 972 -0 1/X Wiederestein Rd IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.56 2 UA 625 501% 607 0 607 348 338 10= `0': Sub -Total 12.29 <12,708 2,938 10,047 277': 2 FM 3009 NCity Limits IH 35 1.62 4 D 675 100% 1010 900 1910 4368 3090 1278: 0 2 Doerr Ln Bell N Dr Lookout Rd 0.91 2 UC 500 100% 50 50 100 913 91 : 822` 0 ". 2 Lookout Rd Doerr Ln Schanz Pkwy 0.62 2 UC 500 100% 133 219 352 623 219 404` 0 2 Four Oaks Ln FM3009 End of Four Oaks Ln 0.33 2 U 500 100% 20 20 40 328 13 315` <0 2/X Schertz Pkwy Lookout Rd Nof IH 35 0.51 2 UA 625 50% 50 0 50 321 26 295: 0' 2 Schertz Pkwy N of 11135 IH 35 0.23 2 UA 625 100% 50 50 100 290 23 267 : 0 2 Schertz Pkwy IH 35 FM78 /John Peterson Bl 3.14 4 D 675 100% 712 753 1465 8471 4596 3875: '0' 2 FM3009 IH 35 S of Woodland Oaks Dr 1.53 5 SA 675 100% 869 980 1849 4129 2828 : 1301 0 2/X FM 3009 S of Woodland Oaks Dr Live Oak Rd 0.47 5 SA 675 50% 0 980 980 640 465 175` '0 2 FM 3009 Live Oak Rd FM 78 /John Peterson BI 1.16 5 SA 675 100% 869 980 1849 3124 2140 `. 985: `0- 2 Wiederstein Rd FM3009 WCity limits 1.45 2 U 500 100% 100 100 200 1449 290 1159! `0 2 Savannah Dr Schertz Pkwy WCityLimits 0.90 2 U 500 100% 50 50 100 905 90 814: 0 2 Live Oak Rd Schanz Pkwy FM3009 6.86 2 UC 500 100% 100 100 200 858 172 686' 0 2 Maske Rd FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy 1,23 2 UC 500 100% 97 105 202 1225 247 978 0` 2 Borgfeld Rd FM3009 ECity Limits 0.43 4 UC 500 100% 509 423 932 859 400 459' <0` 2 FM 1518 /Main St Maske Rd Oak St 1.30 2 UA 625 100% 397 351 748 1623 971 652: =0: 2 FM 1518 /Main St Oak St Aviation Blvd 0.24 4 UA 625 100% 351 397 748 600 179 : 420 0 2 FM 1518 /Main St Aviation Blvd FM 78 /John Peterson BI 0.29 2 UA 625 100% 351 397 748 366 219 147 '.0 2 FM 1518 NCity Limits SA3 Limit 0.36 2 U 625 100% 755 508 1263 452 457 42 47 2/3 FM 1518 SA3 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. 0.39 2 UA 625 50% 755 0 755 245 296 0" 51= 2 Aviation Blvd WCityLimits FM 1518 0.53 2 U 625 100% 613 438 1051 659 554 105 0" 2 FM78 /John Peterson BI Cibolo Creek Schertz Pkwy 0.67 5 SA 675 100% 1525 1096 2621 1809 1756 170' 117''. 2 FM78 /John Peterson BI Schertz Pkwv E City Limits 1.14 5 SA 675 100% 998 520 1518 3065 1723 1342 2 Sub -Total 20.31 37,321 20,846 16,690 215i' 3/2 FM 1518 SA2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. 0.39 2 UA 625 50% 0 508 508 245 199 46 0 3 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext, Lower Seguin Rd 1.31 2 UA 625 100% 755 508 1263 1638 1655 153 .170`. 3 FM 1518 Lower Seguin Rd Trainer Hale Rd 1.93 2 UA 625 100% 790 538 1328 2417 2568 168. 3191 3 FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd IH 10 0.85 2 UA 625 100% 790 538 1328 1057 1123 : 74 139-: 3 Schaefer Rd W End of Schaefer E of FM 1518 0.48 2 UC 500 100% 100 100 200 478 96 383; 0 3/X Schaefer Rd E of FM 1518 E City Limits 0.55 2 UC 500 50% 100 0 100 277 55 222 3/X Schaefer Rd W City Limits RAF - Burnette 0.14 2 UC 500 50% 100 0 100 69 14 : 55> 0 3/X RAF - Burnette Schaefer Rd ECity Limits 0.56 2 UC 500 50% 50 0 50 278 28 : 250'. 0 3/X Lower Seguin Rd W City Limits Eof Tates Dr 0.35 2 U 500 50% 304 0 304 175 107 69: `0 3/X Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Dr FM 1518 2.27 2 UC 500 50% 304 188 492 2272 1118 1154 0 3 Lower Seguin Rd FM 1518 ECity Limits 1.78 2 U 500 100% 37 16 53 : 1783 94 1688 '0i. 3 Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Dr E -S Bend in Ware Segu 0.71 2 UA 625 1001 19 20 39 884 28 857. : 0! 3 Ware Seguin Rd E -S Bend in Ware Seguin R S -E Bend in Ware Saga 0.92 2 UC 500 100% 20 19 39 916 36 881 <0 3 Ware Seguin Rd S -E Bend in Ware Seguin R FM 1518 1 Al 2 UC 500 100% 20 19 39 1412 55 1357: '0'`. 3/4 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 1.11 2 UA 625 50% 238 0 238 697 265 431= 0 3 Pfeil Rd Ware Seguin Rd IH 10 1.32 2 UC 500 100! 22 8 30 1319 40 1279 01: Sub -Total 16.08 15,917 7,479 9,067. 6295 4/3 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 1.11 2 UA 625 50% 0 89 89 697 99 597: "0. 4 Scenic Lake Dr Boeing Dr IH 10 0.78 2 UC 500 100% 20 20 40 781 31 750': '0 `. Sub -Total 1,90 1,478 130 1,3485 '0 Total 50.57 67,424 :.31,393 37,151 1,921 Notes: DA- Divided arterial Direction A= Northbound or Eastbound UA- Undivided arterial Direction B= Southbound or Westbound SA- Special arterial with dual -left turn lane */X indcates roadway half in /half out of City Limits DC- Divided collector */` indicates roadway split between two service areas UC- Undivided collector Appendix B: Projected 10 -Year Growth (Vehicle -Miles of New Demand) Vehicle -Mile Trip Generation by Service Area, Schertz Impact Fee Based on September 2017 land Use Assumptions by FNI Fstimated Pe.,ide.wiai nm4h Vehicle -M'le Tdn (' na Linn SerNce Area Added Dwelling Units Vehicle -Miles per DU Total Vehicle -Miles 1 1,061 3.37 3,576 2 1,389 3.37 4,681 3 3,445 3.37 11,610 4 20 3.37 67 Estimated Basic Emulnvment Growth Vhirle -Mile Generation (1.500 SF/emnlnvee) Service Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000fSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 694 1,500 1,041,000 170 3,852 2 1,751 1,500 2,626,500 3.70 9,718 3 365 1,500 547,500 170 2,026 4 0 1,500 0 3.70 0 Fstimated .4enrire Fmnlnvmant ('-4h Vahirla -Mile Genaratinn 1500 SF1P.- Invee) SerNce Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000lSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 595 500 297,500 5.69 1,693 2 419 500 209,500 5.69 1,192 3 106 500 53,000 5.69 302 4 20 500 10,000 5.69 57 Fstimated Retail Fmnlnvmant (gym h Vahicla-Mila Renaratinn 11 non RF /amn1rni ) SerNce Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000fSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 317 1,000 317,000 4.23 1,341 2 547 1,000 547,000 4.23 2,314 3 232 1,000 232,000 4.23 981 4 0 1,000 0 4.23 0 Vehicle -mile Generation Summary SeNlce Area Residential Growth Vehicle -Miles Basic Growth Vehicle -Miles Service Growth Vehicle -Miles Retail Growth Vehicle -Miles -- Total -- Growth Vehicle- Miles' 1 3,576 3,852 1,693 1,341 - -- 10,461 - 2 4,681 9,718 1,192 2,314 17,905- 3 11,610 2,026 302 981 -- .14,918- 4 67 0 57 0 -------- -124 - Totals 19,934 15,596 3,243 4,636 - - - -- 43,408 - SUEquivalency Residential DU 3.37 Basic Employ SF 3.70 Service Employ SF 5.69 Retail Employ SF 4.23 Appendix C: Roadway Capital Improvements Plan ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PROJECTS Definitions LANES The total number of lanes in both directions available for travel. TYPE The type of roadway (used in determining capacity): DA = divided arterial UA = undivided arterial SA = special arterial (arterial with continuous left turn) DC = divided collector UC = undivided collector SC = special collector (arterial with continuous left turn) PK -HR VOLUME The existing volumes of cars on the roadway segment traveling during the afternoon (P.M.) peak hour of travel. IN SERVICE AREA If the roadway is located on the boundary of the service area (with the city limits running along the centerline of the roadway), then half of the roadway is inventoried in the service area and the other half is not. This value is either 50% or 100 %. VEH -MI SUPPLY The number of total service units (vehicle - miles) supplied within PK -HR TOTAL the service area, based on the length and established capacity of the roadway type. VEH -MI TOTAL The total service unit (vehicle -mile) demand created by DEMAND PK -HR existing traffic on the roadway segment in the afternoon peak hour. EXCESS CAPACITY The number of service units supplied but unused by PK -HR VEH -MI existing traffic in the afternoon peak hour. CIP VEH -MI The number of service units used by existing traffic in excess of DEFICIENCY the available service units supplied by the roadway in the afternoon peak hour. � o o o 0 0 00 0 0...0 0 00 0 00 0 0 o 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 of o 0 0 00 0 00 0 o a - U r V) 2 NO (9 O O O W W 'O M1 V O' m 0 O 0 O N O O MI F O O O O O O O t«6 N V N r d@ VI N M M O N 0 O O V N M 'M OM I M ' .O � .N W Q . M O O m V N o V . h . O . h m W O O . m 9. F W h NcO N O.N N V h M� W N'h O N MN MM h V.M V W O> N H 'O <p M M O N h M U5 r r S � 2 M M O O O O M M W (O N F O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O h 00 O O O O O O O E F-o = m N Q N N M Q d O d c4 ?D f9 t9 iQ 6 0 4 4 0 61 d Q d O O 4 d Q d d O d 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 M O 0 0 o N o a M - N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn ¢ Q ¢ w m ¢ ¢ Q ¢ m@ m m o o O o m °° m °° O° m m° m O m O O O m o o o N 5 . m o c c c C a U o U..' .ga9J .o .o N ,o N N N 'C 'C _ d N Lo,. N N N N N A < o o Q o o o o 'C Q Q O ¢ O ¢ O o o Q o o 4 '�' U U U U U U¢ U U .`, U U U I U U U 'a u m a m R a m iu m m is m m m m m m m �t m m o m m m 'm m m m F, m m o m m E sa m m m N C G o C G (} G U U U C C C G is G C C p ❑ a o 0 0 Q1 C C c C c E = E a o 5 a o a a 'oo ._ o o -aa' o 0 o N N N o N N N ° av a"i aoi w a a` a` a` o. a`. a a oai m a"i - a c w ooi E- E E E- E E E cn v> u> zn E E E v> m v ta w m m v u5 v) m w E yr E E E va E E E o ° o a cc o a o v ° o as °J : d d d d d U d d d d Q d d U d U U d U U d U U U U d d d U Q U Q U U U Q U U U o � 2 J M (p N N d) O> O La N c) z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a .E .E x .E .E .E .E .E tY m h c c c Ci c f= -o a o o J N o o o U 2 U Y U U U U o s a@ to U o r va F tL fl' z CC LL LL Z fr Li. N W fE_ z 1L LL❑ ii w W W w w w Z W 0 0 0 LL U J CC Z Z iA_ Z❑ u) Z J a a � o m o O � GSi X C aai aai z ii � z J Rs n aai N N O 4 M C O C N N 9 W C J 0 6 4 T w M W N N V��' Ip O o sn v° srs U U cNV v °' z cn v �n v> o a u5 s W `c U U o 0 o a o o M M rn v5 °o c u M M cn a M o° U c cai o u m M M U t/> U M 2 2 M� LL LL z z !.i. Z LL rn ?? S LL � N w vt U uJ ? z z z LL LL Z I.I_ F w O O O O EL o o p o O S O O U CS 'O 'O a -O C C T S] U U Q O 'a, U U tJ U J T N N N C !t! G 41 0 fS U G G M C O C G C r G N tt1 w t(? C o o N N N N N C C A O m .O .> C? a C 3 N N N U U U a. m w �' 3 U 3 0 0 w �' U U ° U U U ;,7,0`. �' i j Ua U U CJ C3 0 0 s s w s o o m o o °a '> `'> 0 0 K I LL. IL z w w IL LL LL L Z Z tL V1 W w u) LL LL 0 Z U W W W z z w O ❑ z W w W W m1 LL .O .° d' u7 CR r a2 O O - .- N m e- N X N X X' o � ,- •- .`- ,- •- •- ,- •- •- .`- •- ,- �- •- ,- ,- •- ,- •- •- •- •- •- •- •- •- - •- N O ri of o......0 o o o o o o o . o . . o . . o o ....o o o 75 -Ta -cz -c5 �5 -c -c5 -c < 0 0 0 0 a a¢¢ a¢ 0 < Q¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 < < so O. L 2 . Q Q. -p -p 2- E- .2- E E E 0- a`. 0- E E E E E !Y o o cr [2 w CK w Of E E o 0 to a) < < < < < < < oO � M M . O. N N N chD � Iq M 't MI M 3 3 z z z z z z z z z zl z z zo z z z zo z z z z z z z z z z z z z z ZI z z z x -0 LU tis 0 a. I Q. U) T D W, o U) 0 V) U) .1 U) w Cl) w w co co (n U) m z 3� z I za O LU E X t z, z, < C) U) R m 0. 2, oz U<) U) w z z z z 0 z 0 CL N 0 0 0 & o E & mu U) co of vo) V) U) c fn ai c W Q 0 0 C) U) U) co U) w U) U) a5 w Q U) U) m I X x W-1 O Appendix D: Roadway Improvement Plan Cost Analysis 8 3 s 2 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 s 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 8 o g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O q q m 15 15 16 Ill 16 14 4 16 1� - <O 14 4 14 c4 14 li 1: 1� 15 13 ll� 15 �7 Ill 14 -7 a - - - - - - - - - - - w 0 8 8 8 2 8 8 8 8 8 s 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 8 8 °° 8 8 8 8 8 o0 c� �q cD (D n cD q cl� �q n N N oa v� cr� N (q q in v� n "I oO N cR � cl� IQ IQ M �q 13� 1� testa ,4 c\i 4 1 1 - N N - - "i 6 1 D - - - - - o; a -1 e; 2 a a -1 11; 2 71 v; -" ;; -1 -" - - . - - -" -I I 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . °O . . . . . . . . . 0 -D q Iq 10 q 1� �D CO q 1� LO q 0? ° N q ml LO P� N 1� ct 0 0 �� o 0 0 0 0 � o ° o 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °F9 0 0 0 � N o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo 4 an � di ro 75 a -�a -F� -6 — — — — — - m m m t -ra g- cL 't 't 't, T� 1� oo < —o —o - — — o < < < < < o o o o < < o < < < < < < < < < < -m -F� -Fo -Fo 76 co -F, -�6 7� 'F� -Z6 -�a --�a -za 'ffi le -ffi 16 76 16 �a 21 2- S., .2- 2 2 2 2 �2 o E E 2o ct E clt tt ct c� L �t E ol E E E E E E E U3 u) co u) E o- E E u) u) u) E u) E E E u) E E E o o In u, c� cf c� o o o o o o < < < < < U < < < < < < < U Q U U Q U U Q U U U U < < < U < U < Z I N O o O . . O. . . . . . O. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 c5 6 ('i N l 6 0 6 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 o o 2 2 2 z- Z` z w U) 0 Q U) Lu I Lu U) w m w 0 0 0 z z z 0' 9') z I C c N tab 10 10 N w N LU 'T' U) T 'N �: tit U') 0, Z5 >z m Z5 b Z5 6 6 i2 2 2 2c m o o 0 0 0 Q o 0 o u E ��E 2'R :�R :2 2 if - . I L. 2 z I w Z w w :f :f (D 3: 0 w w z z w 0 ❑ �2 :1 ,2 �2 t2 — .- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O. o o O 8 8 8 .1 1. .1 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. .1 1. 1. 1. OM NO V 1. .1 .1 1 1. V Na 1. yy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O .0 �: cl� ll� 0 1� Iq IQ MO clz 00 11 O -i q N N N M N q q 1: M Ffi 14 C6 14 1 vs U -D ID cD 1� Iz c� -D �q 10 cD Iq cli m ll� D c6 q O 14 4 11: ll� ml m �T o F. Lu in m 75 75 75 m Q Q 76 m < �5 �3 'Fo m 75 c, -m 6 �t' m m t z -6 z _ °a < 0 0 0 < o 0 < U0 < 0 0 u Q C) 0 < < < r y < < < io -F m m m m m -M ct Of x m o w 2 2 1 .2- Z t Z3 21, i�l 2� 2� 2 2 o o . . . w w - E E E o E E E o j) CL u) E E o E E E E M it . , D� af of o o o u) of ol lo o o u) w u) to U CJ U7 J) Li < U U U U U < < < < < < U < < < < < < U U U U U U < < < < < U U < K ❑ D u) u) (n ❑ u) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ u) u) ❑ ❑ ❑ n n n D > ❑ ❑ (n u) In (o v) u) u) u) -6 Z Ic! 2 . O 4 c5 c5 , — . O. . . . . . . . . . . . I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 z z z z z z z z z zi o m u) z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z( z z zi LU m us in z- z, m o m Lu Lu u) (n co u) o w �22 Lu A Lu w o u) u) u) u) w El it g E m ❑ p E 8� 9 u) 22 15 5 N m o o u) a� co z w z z z z m 1 6 z m, co Fn 15 m k6 x oe ae 2 .2 2 & & .2 .2 Z5 I o -2 1 m o 1 38 U o o o co u) . . . . 0 0 Q 0 c c o Ly � � to u) @ of co w z z z z Lu (D z X x x Ni ml O 4i ig 0 F- Appendix E: Roadway Project Cost Estimates Master Thoroughfare Plan Roadway Sections Freeways, Limited Access The freeway is typically uninterrupted with grade separations at intersections and ramped entries and exits to and from they crossroads as on 1 -35. However, limited access r,• { freeways may also be interrupted for signalized arterial roadway crossings. a a I I , Freeways typically operate at free flow speeds over 55 mph and have two or more lanes in a7a�N�tia{RC? GGWP¢FI4 ¢,iTtI�TCGmti each travel direction. Freeways are typically r� M ff"ao- R bra f*&,*N 'Ptw N1S barrier or median separated, or in the example of the managed lanes under design for 1 -35, can be grade separated from the rest of the corridor where ROW is constrained. The managed lanes element is intended to help maintain a free -flow speed, even during times of peak congestion on adjacent facilities. Freeways, especially controlled access, are typically paralleled by service roads that serve as the interface between the freeway and the adjacent community's arterial and collector street network. Source: Figure 11. 1-35 Managed lanes illustrative - View from Schertz Parkway. Principal Arterials The recommended ROW for principal arterials ranges from 120 to 130 feet. The ROW is intended to accommodate higher volumes and levels of mobility, providing substantial regional access and statewide travel. A ROW of 120 feet allows for four travel lanes and associated spaces. Where six travel lanes are needed, a typical section of 130 feet can be used. Urban principal arterial roadways provide the predominant passageways through the urbanized portions of the community and connect to the regional freeway network, typically providing for curb and gutter drainage. Intersections are provided at all arterial, collector and local roadways and as needed allowing for local land access directly to the facility. Intersections with arterial roadways are typically signalized and provisions made for one or more left turn lanes and occasionally right -turn lanes to facilitate the through movements along the arterial. Principal urban arterial roadways provide at least two travel lanes in each direction plus a center median area for separations of traffic. The median area may be used to provide channelized left -turn lanes, continuous left -turn lanes, and /or streetscape. Where traffic operational Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan analyses support the need for greater throughput capacity, a six -lane section may be considered — as is the case for the ultimate build out of FM 1518 south of FM 78. Access management practices should be employed to minimize the impacts of property access (i.e., driveways) on the principal arterial facility. Sidewalks, five to ten feet in width, should be provided along either sides of the roadway, buffered from travel lanes. A divided median is key for this classification of roadway, and a median width minimum of 16 feet is included. A divided median of sufficient width allows area for dedicated left turn lanes at intersections and provides access management for fewer turning conflicts, and preservation of traffic flow. The median may be raised, or surfaced depending on the adjacent land use. Driveway access onto principal arterials should be limited by access management and spacing requirements, and parking along arterial roadways is generally prohibited. The illustrations below show typical sections for four and six travel lanes with surfaced medians. • High degree of regional mobility, higher traffic volumes and operational speeds • Access is carefully managed • Curb and gutter section with underground stormwater utilities and drainage • Examples include Roy Richard Drive (FM 3009), FM 78, FM 1103, and FM 1518 south of FM 78. Figure 13. Six -Lane Principal Arterial Section Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Secondary Arterial The ROW for a secondary arterial in Schertz is 90 feet wide. The arterial is intended to accommodate medium volumes and local mobility, and provide for connections to neighboring communities. Secondary arterial roadways are intended for local trips, so design speeds should also be notably lower than principal arterials. A ROW of 90 feet allows for four travel lanes, and space to buffer different travel modes. A divided median is also important for this classification of roadway, allowing some area for reduced width left turn lanes at minor intersections and provides access management for fewer turning conflicts. Additional ROW may be preferred at major intersections. Driveway access to Secondary Arterials should also be guided by access management and spacing requirements. Parking along secondary arterial roadways is generally prohibited, unless parallel parking bays are provided in addition to travel lanes, which may be desirable in a potential mixed -use transit oriented district north of 1 -35. Bicycle accommodation is intended to be provided on a shared -use path (or hike - and -bike path), buffered from the roadway. • Cross -Town mobility • Accommodates medium traffic volumes and operational speeds • Managed Access • Four -lane divided • Curb and gutter drainage • Examples include Lower Seguin Road east of FM 1518, Wiederstein /Old Wiederstein Road, and the east -west portion of Trainer Hale Road. Figure 1. Secondary Arterial Section — Wederstein Road Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Secondary Rural Arterial Rural Secondary Arterial roadways carry traffic across significant segments of the city, connect principal arterials to collectors and accommodate moderate volumes at higher speeds. This section is intended for use where adjacent, planned land uses are lower intensity, and access points fewer than the urban section would provide. The recommended ROW for Secondary Rural Arterials is 90 feet and is intended to include a three -lane section, with two travel lanes and a surfaced median. Travel lanes should be 12 feet wide with 6- to 8- foot -wide shoulders to accommodate emergency parking, extended site lines, and bicycles. Wide areas at the edge of paved shoulders provide for stormwater drainage and buffer from the roadway from adjacent property. Where sidewalks are provided, they should be between the drainage channel and the edge of the ROW. Driveways should still be guided by access management principles. A two -way left - turn lane in the center of the section provides buffer distance from oncoming traffic and left turn opportunities without obstructing the through- movement. An adjacent 20- foot -wide trail easement allows for accommodating pedestrians and bicycles on a shared -use path (or hike - and -bike path) sufficiently buffered from the travel way, and opportunities for tree growth. • Cross -town mobility • Accommodates medium traffic volumes and higher operational speeds • Access is managed • Two -lane divided • Open section drainage Examples include Lower Seguin Road west of Hollering Vine and adjacent to Randolph AFB, and Ware Seguin Road west of FM 1518. Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Collector roadways serve to provide access to higher functional class facilities, access to residential areas, and provide access and circulation to commercial areas. They are designed for short trips, lower speeds, and connections between residential and commercial areas. They are differentiated from arterial streets by their length and degree of access to adjacent development where driveway access is seldom limited. The recommended ROW for Collector roadways is 70 feet wide. The pavement width of 40 feet is wide enough to provide different layouts of lane striping to accommodate adjacent uses — whether it is on street parking, or bike lanes, or a center -turn lane, the width is intended to be flexible over time as needs change. Three typical sections are provided: one residential section with on street bike lanes, one commercial section with a middle turn lane for frequent driveways and turn - movements, and one commercial section with on street parking. • Collection and distribution of traffic • Speeds and volumes dependent on adjacent land uses and neighborhoods served • Access to development and neighborhoods • Connectivity to arterial and residential collector streets Typical Residential Collector — 70 -foot ROW: 7 -foot buffered bike lanes accommodate bicycles of all comfort levels. Examples include Ray Corbett Drive, Live Oak Road, Wiederstein Road west of FM 3009, Country Club Boulevard, Eckhardt Road, and segments of Ware Seguin Road. '- •- • • •' Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Typical Commercial Collectors — 70 -foot ROW — applicable in Southern Schertz near 1 -10 and northern Schertz near 1 -35. The 12- foot -wide outside lanes can accommodate more experienced bicycles. A shared - used path on one side accommodates less experienced bicycles. Figure 18. Commercial Collector (TOD) - Example: New Streets in TOD area LOCI Residential and Commercial/industrial Streets The primary function of local streets is to provide access to and from properties. Local streets feed to and from the collector street network, but occasionally may tie directly to arterial streets. The urban local residential street is described in the Schertz Unified Development Code as a 30 -foot pavement width, with curb - and - gutter drainage and minimum 5- foot -wide sidewalks on each side of the street, buffered from the curb. Local residential streets have a 50- foot -wide ROW. Local commercial /industrial streets are described as 42 feet of pavement, with curb and gutter drainage, 5 -foot sidewalks, and a 60- foot -wide ROW. Local streets are not illustrated on the MTP map, but are encouraged to be developed to increase connectivity, lessen block lengths, and encourage active and non -auto modes of travel for people on foot, pedestrians in wheelchairs, and people on bike. Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Impact Fee CIP Project Cost Estimates City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,690 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 17 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 51,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 84,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 163,800 4 10" Flex Base 11,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 203,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 79,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 169,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,950 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 19,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 47,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 28,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 190,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,236,950 Mobilization 5% $ 61,900 Contineencv 10% $ 129,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,428,800 7% $ 100,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 2 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 FM 482 to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,379 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 166,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 18,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 325,800 4 10" Flex Base 22,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 406,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 158,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,520 LF $ 25.00 $ 338,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 280,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,640 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 36,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 92,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 55,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 368,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 2,545,600 127,300 267,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,940,200 7% $ 205,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 3 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 Railroad Tracks to N. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial = No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,162 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 58,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 6,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 111,600 4 10" Flex Base 7,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 140,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 7,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 54,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 7,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 7,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,650 LF $ 25.00 $ 116,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,970 SY $ 5.00 $ 14,850 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 12,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 31,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 19,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 126,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other None - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 825,000 Mobilization 5% $ 41,300 Contineencv 10% $ 86,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 953,000 7% $ 66,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 4 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (1) IH -35 to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,600 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 66 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 198,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 324,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 4 10" Flex Base 44,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 792,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 44,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 308,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 44,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 44,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 26,400 LF $ 25.00 $ 660,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 550,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 16,870 SY $ 5.00 $ 84,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 71,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 179,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 107,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 718,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 4,822,250 241,200 506,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,569,900 7% $ 389,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 445,500 $ 445,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 5 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (1) N/S Connector (1) to FM 2252 Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial - No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,227 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 62 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 316,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 36,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 649,800 4 10" Flex Base 43,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 774,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 43,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 301,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 43,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 43,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 20,910 LF $ 25.00 $ 522,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 290,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,130 SY $ 5.00 $ 40,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 62,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 154,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 92,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 619,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ - $ 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 15 ©,000 4,175, 300 208,800 438,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,822,600 7% $ 337,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 352,800 $ 352,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 6 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (2) N/S Connector (1) to FM 2252 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,227 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 206,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 439,200 4 10" Flex Base 27,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 502,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 27,900 SY $ 7.00 $ 195,300 6 TX -5 Geogrid 27,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 27,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 10,460 LF $ 25.00 $ 261,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 13,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 695,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 49,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 124,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 74,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 497,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,232,200 Mobilization 5% $ 161,700 Contineencv 10% $ 339,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,733,300 7% $ 261,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 274,400 $ 274,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 FM 2252 to Hubertus Rd Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,544 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 56 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 168,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 272,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 532,800 4 10" Flex Base 37,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 666,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 37,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 259,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 37,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 37,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 22,180 LF $ 25.00 $ 554,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 9,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 460,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 32,650 SY $ 5.00 $ 163,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 62,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 155,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 93,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 622,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,246,550 Mobilization 5% $ 212,400 Contineencv 10% $ 445,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,904,900 7% $ 343,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 207,900 $ 207,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 8 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Hubertus Rd to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,280 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 260,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 28,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 507,600 4 10" Flex Base 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 35,200 SY $ 7.00 $ 246,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 35,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 35,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,120 LF $ 25.00 $ 528,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 440,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 31,090 SY $ 5.00 $ 155,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 59,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 148,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 89,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 593,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 4,005,050 200,300 420,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,626,000 7% $ 323,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 9 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 800' West of Friesenhahn Ln. to Friesenhahn Ln. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (►f): 800 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 8 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 77,400 4 10" Flex Base 5,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 97,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 37,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,200 LF $ 25.00 $ 80,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 65,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,710 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 9,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 22,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 90,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 585,750 Mobilization 5% - $ 29,300 Contineencv 10% $ 61,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 676,700 7% $ 47,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 10 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Friesenhahn Ln. to Schwab Rd. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,115 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 32 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 96,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 154,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 300,600 4 10" Flex Base 20,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 374,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 145,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 12,470 LF $ 25.00 $ 311,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 260,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 18,350 SY $ 5.00 $ 91,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 35,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 87,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 52,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 351,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100;000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,381,500 Mobilization 5% $ 119,100 Contineencv 10% $ 250,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,750,700 7% $ 192,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 116,800 $ 116,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Schwab Rd. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,336 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 64 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 192,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 310,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 33,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 608,400 4 10" Flex Base 42,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 761,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 42,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 296,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 42,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 42,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 25,350 LF $ 25.00 $ 633,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 530,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 37,310 SY $ 5.00 $ 186,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 71,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 178,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 106,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 712,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,828,900 Mobilization 5% $ 241,500 Contineencv 10% $ 507,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,577,500 7% $ 390,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 237,600 $ 237,600 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 12 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HUBERTUS ROAD IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 3,010 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 148,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 289,800 4 10" Flex Base 20,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 361,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 140,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 12,040 LF $ 25.00 $ 301,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 250,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 17,720 SY $ 5.00 $ 88,600 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 33,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 84,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 50,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20%_ $ 338,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,201,000 Mobilization 5% $ 110,100 Contineencv 10% $ 231,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,542,300 7% $ 178,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 135,400 $ 135,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 13 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HUBERTUS ROAD FM 482 to N. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,584 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 - - - - Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 16 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 48,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 78,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 8,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 153,000 4 10" Flex Base 10,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 190,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 10,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 74,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 10,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 10,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,340 LF $ 25.00 $ 158,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 130,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,330 SY $ 5.00 $ 46,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 17,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 44,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 26,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 178,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,156,750 Mobilization 5% $ 57,900 Contineencv 10% $ 121,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,336,200 7% $ 93,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 142,600 $ 142,600 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 14 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: FRIESENHAHN LANE IH -35 to FM 482 Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 1,690 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 17 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 51,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 62,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 129,600 4 10" Flex Base 8,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 149,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 8,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 58,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 8,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 8,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,380 LF $ 25.00 $ 84,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,820 SY $ 5.00 $ 14,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 14,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 34,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 21,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 139,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000' 1,056,300 52,900 111,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,220,200 7% $ 85,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 15 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHWAB ROAD IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 3,326 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 200 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 - - - - - - Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard - - - Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 218,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 25,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 453,600 4 10" Flex Base 29,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 532,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 29,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 207,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 29,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 29,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,310 LF $ 25.00 $ 332,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 275,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 41,760 SY $ 5.00 $ 208,800 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 47,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 118,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 70,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 472,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other At -grade RR crossing - - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,317,750 Mobilization 5% $ 165,900 Contineencv 10% $ 348,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,832,100 7% $ 268,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 274,400 $ 274,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 16 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: E/W CONNECTOR (3) Hubertus Rd. to David Lack Blvd. Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 8,395 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 84 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 252,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 302,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 35,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 639,000 4 10" Flex Base 41,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 739,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 41,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 287,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 41,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 41,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 16,800 LF $ 25.00 $ 420,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 14,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 700,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 13,990 SY $ 5.00 $ 69,950 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 69,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 172,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 103,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 690,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,587,250 Mobilization 5% $ 229,400 Contineencv 10% $ 481,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,298,400 7% $ 370,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 440,700 $ 440,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 17 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate ECKHARDT ROAD Froboese Ln. to Green Valley Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,861 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 177,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 212,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 446,400 4 10" Flex Base 28,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 516,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 28,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 200,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 28,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 28,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,730 LF $ 25.00 $ 293,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 13,020 SY $ 5.00 $ 65,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 45,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 113,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 68,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 453,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,944,550 Mobilization 5% $ 147,300 Contineencv 10% $ 309,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,401,100 7% $ 238,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 87,900 $ 87,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 18 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHWAB ROAD IH -35 to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial =_ No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,019 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 61 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 183,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 14,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 296,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 32,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 579,600 4 10" Flex Base 40,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 723,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 40,200 SY $ 7.00 $ 281,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 40,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 40,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 24,080 LF $ 25.00 $ 602,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 500,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 15,380 SY $ 5.00 $ 76,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 65,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 164,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 98,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 656,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,267,700 Mobilization 5% - $ 213,400 Contineencv 10% $ 448,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,929,300 7% $ 345,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 406,300 $ 406,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 19 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FROBOESE LANE Schwab Rd. to Eckhardt Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 3,010 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 108,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 230,400 4 10" Flex Base 14,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 266,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 103,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,020 LF $ 25.00 $ 150,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 165,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,690 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 23,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 58,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 35,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 233,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,514,950 Mobilization 5% $ 75,800 Contineencv 10% $ 159,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,749,900 7% $ 122,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 158,000 $ 158,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 20 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FROBOESE LANE E/W Break Pt. 1 to E/W Break Pt. 2 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,380 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 14 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 42,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 50,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 106,200 4 10" Flex Base 6,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 122,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 6,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 47,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 6,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 6,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 69,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 75,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,070 SY $ 5.00 $ 15,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 10,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 26,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 16,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 106,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 694,850 Mobilization 5% $ 34,800 Contineencv 10% $ 73,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 802,700 7% $ 56,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 31,100 $ 31,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 21 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate GREEN VALLEY ROAD W. City Limits to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 4,594 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 46 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 138,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 11,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 226,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 441,000 4 10" Flex Base 30,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 552,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 30,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 214,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 30,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 30,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 18,380 LF $ 25.00 $ 459,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,700 SY $ 50.00 $ 385,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 11,740 SY $ 5.00 $ 58,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 50,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 125,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 75,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 501,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,258,500 Mobilization 5% $ 163,000 Contineencv 10% $ 342,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,763,700 7% $ 263,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 172,300 $ 172,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 22 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HOMESTEAD PARKWAY Existing Homestead Pkwy. to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,742 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 18 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 54,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,200 Cy $ 20.00 $ 64,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 133,200 4 10" Flex Base 8,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 154,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 8,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 60,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 8,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 8,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,490 LF $ 25.00 $ 87,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,870 SY $ 5.00 $ 19,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 13,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 33,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 20,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 135,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 879,500 Mobilization 5% $ 44,000 Contineencv 10% $ 92,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,015,900 7% $ 71,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 91,500 $ 91,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 23 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate COUNTRY CLUB BOULEVARD Scenic Links to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,848 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 19 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 57,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 68,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 142,200 4 10" Flex Base 9,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 163,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 9,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 63,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 9,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 9,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,700 LF $ 25.00 $ 92,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 105,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,110 SY $ 5.00 $ 20,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 14,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 36,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 21,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 144,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 938,550 Mobilization 5% $ 47,000 Contineencv 10% $ 98,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,084,200 7% $ 75,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 24 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (4) Country Club Blvd. to Homestead Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,073 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 41 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 123,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 148,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 17,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 309,600 4 10" Flex Base 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 140,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,150 LF $ 25.00 $ 203,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 225,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,050 SY $ 5.00 $ 45,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 30,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 76,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 45,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 305,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,988,250 Mobilization 5% $ 99,500 Contineencv 10% $ 208,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,296,600 7% $ 160,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 213,800 $ 213,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 25 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (4) Schwab Rd. to Eckhardt Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,376 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 24 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 72,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 86,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 181,800 4 10" Flex Base 11,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 210,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 81,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 119,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 130,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,280 SY $ 5.00 $ 26,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 18,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 46,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 27,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 183,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,195,300 Mobilization 5% $ 59,800 Contineencv 10% $ 125,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,380,700 7% $ 96,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 124,700 $ 124,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 26 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1103 IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,696 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard funded through City Go Bonds, TxDOT, and AAMPO. City contribution anticipated at $2,000,000 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction City contribution - - - $ 2,000,000 Engineering /Survey /Testing 7% $ - Right -of -Way Acquisition Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ - $ - 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 27 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (1) IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 2,904 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 30 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 90,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 279,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 349,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 135,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,420 SY $ 5.00 $ 37,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 31,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 79,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 47,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 316,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,158,000 Mobilization 5% $ 107,900 Contineencv 10% $ 226,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,492,500 7% $ 174,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 28 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: N/S CONNECTOR (2) IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 3,854 90 Raised 48 Construction of new roadwa Shared -Use Path bicycle facil hfare standard Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 39 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 117,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 190,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 370,800 4 10" Flex Base 25,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 462,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 25,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 179,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 25,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 25,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 15,420 LF $ 25.00 $ 385,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 320,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,850 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 42,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 105,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 63,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 420,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,731,250 Mobilization 5% $ 136,600 Contineencv 10% $ 286,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,154,700 7% $ 220,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 260,200 $ 260,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 29 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (5) N/S Connector (1) to FM 1103 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 10,552 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 106 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 318,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 19,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 380,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 44,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 802,800 4 10" Flex Base 51,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 928,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 51,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 361,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 51,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 51,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,110 LF $ 25.00 $ 527,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,700 SY $ 50.00 $ 585,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 23,450 SY $ 5.00 $ 117,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 81,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 203,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 122,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 814,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 5,294,300 Mobilization 5% $ 264,800 Contineencv 10% $ 556,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 6,115,100 7% $ 428,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 554,000 $ 554,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 30 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate OLD WIEDERSTEIN ROAD N/S Connector (1) to Cherry Tree Dr. Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 11,458 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 115 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 345,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 28,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 562,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 61,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,101,600 4 10" Flex Base 76,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,375,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 76,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 534,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 76,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 76,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 45,840 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,146,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 19,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 955,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 29,280 SY $ 5.00 $ 146,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 124,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 312,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 187,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 1,248,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 8,115,300 Mobilization 5% $ 405,800 Contineencv 10% $ 852,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 9,373,300 7% $ 656,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 257,800 $ 257,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 31 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate DOERR LANE N. City Limits to Lookout Rd. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 4,805 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 49 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 147,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 174,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 365,400 4 10" Flex Base 23,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 423,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 23,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 94,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 23,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 23,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 240,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 400,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,010 SY $ 5.00 $ 40,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 38,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 95,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 57,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 381,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 15©,000 2,629,600 131,500 276,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,037,300 7% $ 212,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 32 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (2) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 - - - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 4 10" Flex Base 22,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 412,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,560 LF $ 25.00 $ 214,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 39,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 98,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 59,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 393,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ ? $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,558,200 Mobilization 5% $ 128,000 Contineencv 10% $ 268,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,954,900 7% $ 206,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 224,500 $ 224,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 33 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (6) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 4 10" Flex Base 22,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 412,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,560 LF $ 25.00 $ 214,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 39,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 98,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 59,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 393,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,558,200 Mobilization 5% $ 127,900 Contineencv 10% $ 268,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,954,800 7% $ 206,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 224,500 $ 224,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 34 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MID - CITIES PARKWAY IH -35 to FM 3009 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 5,174 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 - - - - - Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 52 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 156,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 186,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 21,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 394,200 4 10" Flex Base 25,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 455,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 25,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 101,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 25,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 25,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 10,350 LF $ 25.00 $ 258,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 430,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,620 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 41,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 102,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 61,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 410,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,664,950 Mobilization 5% $ 133,300 Contineencv 10% $ 279,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,078,200 7% $ 215,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 35 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (1) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 62 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 258,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 531,000 4 10" Flex Base 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 35,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 140,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 35,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 35,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 17,110 LF $ 25.00 $ 427,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,650 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 48,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 121,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 72,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 485,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,157,400 Mobilization 5% $ 157,900 Contineencv 10% $ 331,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,646,900 7% $ 255,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 288,700 $ 288,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 36 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (7) W. City Limits to Doerr Ln. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 3,432 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 35 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 105,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 124,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 14,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 261,000 4 10" Flex Base 16,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 302,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 16,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 67,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 16,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 16,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,870 LF $ 25.00 $ 171,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 190,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,630 SY $ 5.00 $ 38,150 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 25,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 63,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 38,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 255,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,659,400 Mobilization 5% $ 83,000 Contineencv 10% $ 174,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,916,700 7% $ 134,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 180,200 $ 180,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 37 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOOKOUT ROAD Tri- County Pkwy. to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 3,907 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 40 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 120,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 297,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 345,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 76,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,820 LF $ 25.00 $ 195,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,510 SY $ 5.00 $ 32,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 31,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 77,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 46,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 310,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,219,950 Mobilization 5% - $ 111,000 Contineencv 10% $ 233,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,564,100 7% $ 179,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 38 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FOUR OAKS LANE Existing Four Oaks Ln. to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 2,851 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane J 38 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 29 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 87,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 104,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 217,800 4 10" Flex Base 14,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 252,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 56,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,750 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 34,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 227,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,478,700 Mobilization 5% $ 74,000 Contineencv 10% $ 155,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,708,000 7% $ 119,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 149,700 $ 149,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 39 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: E. City Limits to FM 3009 Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 3,379 90 Raised 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 166,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 18,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 325,800 4 10" Flex Base 22,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 406,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 90,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,520 LF $ 25.00 $ 338,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 280,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,640 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 35,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 88,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 53,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 355,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,307,400 Mobilization 5% $ 115,400 Contineencv 10% $ 242,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,665,100 7% $ 186,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 228,100 $ 228,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 40 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate WIEDERSTEIN ROAD W. City Limits to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,165 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 22 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 66,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 78,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 165,600 4 10" Flex Base 10,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 190,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 10,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 42,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 10,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 10,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 108,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,810 SY $ 5.00 $ 24,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 16,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 40,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 24,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 161,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,047,600 Mobilization 5% $ 52,400 Contineencv 10% $ 110,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,210,000 7% $ 84,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 41 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate BAPTIST HEALTH DRIVE Ripps - Kreusler to Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,426 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 15 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 52,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 6,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 109,800 4 10" Flex Base 7,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 126,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 7,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 28,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 7,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 7,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,860 LF $ 25.00 $ 71,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,380 SY $ 5.00 $ 11,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 11,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 28,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 17,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 114,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 742,800 Mobilization 5% $ 37,200 Contineencv 10% $ 78,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 858,000 7% $ 60,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 74,800 $ 74,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 42 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate RIPPS- KREUSLER Baptist Health Dr. to End of Alignment Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,162 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 42,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 90,000 4 10" Flex Base 5,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 102,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,700 SY $ 4.00 $ 22,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 58,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 1,940 SY $ 5.00 $ 9,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 9,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 23,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 92,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 600,950 Mobilization 5% $ 30,100 Contineencv 10% $ 63,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 694,300 7% $ 48,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 43 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MASKE ROAD FM 1518 to Oak St. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 2,851 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 29 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 87,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 104,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 217,800 4 10" Flex Base 14,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 252,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 56,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,750 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 34,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 227,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,478,700 Mobilization 5% $ 74,000 Contineencv 10% $ 155,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,708,000 7% $ 119,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 44 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MASKE ROAD Oak St. to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,646 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 47 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 141,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 19,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 354,600 4 10" Flex Base 22,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 410,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,300 LF $ 25.00 $ 232,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 260,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 10,330 SY $ 5.00 $ 51,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 34,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 86,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 52,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 346,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Major Crossing $ 500,000 $ 500,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,752,050 Mobilization 5% $ 137,700 Contineencv 10% $ 289,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,178,800 7% $ 222,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 243,900 $ 243,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 45 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: FM 1518 Maske Rd. to Oak St. Secondary Arterial = No. of Lanes: 3 -_ 6.864 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard; special section Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 69 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 207,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 248,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 522,000 4 10" Flex Base 33,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 604,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 33,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 134,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 33,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 33,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,730 LF $ 25.00 $ 343,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 11,440 SY $ 5.00 $ 57,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 54,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 136,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 81,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 544,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,636,650 Mobilization 5% $ 181,900 Contineencv 10% $ 381,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,200,500 7% $ 294,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 46 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 N. City Limits to Service Area 3 Limit Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 1,901 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 20 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 60,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 124,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 14,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 259,200 4 10" Flex Base 16,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 304,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 16,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 67,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 16,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 16,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 190,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 160,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,080 SY $ 5.00 $ 45,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 24,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 61,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 36,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 245,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 = $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,696,050 Mobilization 5% $ 84,900 Contineencv 10% $ 178,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 391,800 7% $ 27,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 17,100 $ 17,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 47 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 Service Area 3 Limit to Schertz Pkwy. Extension Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 2,059 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 21 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 63,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 136,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 280,800 4 10" Flex Base 18,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 331,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 18,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 73,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 18,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 18,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,240 LF $ 25.00 $ 206,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 170,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,840 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 26,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 66,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 39,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20%_ $ 265,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,726,900 Mobilization 5% $ 86,400 Contineencv 10% $ 181,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 398,900 7% $ 27,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 48 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 78 /JOHN PETERSON BOULEVARD W. City Limits to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 9,557 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 96 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 288,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 31,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 624,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 72,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,301,400 4 10" Flex Base 85,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,530,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 85,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 340,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 85,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 85,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 38,230 LF $ 25.00 $ 955,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 15,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 795,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 35,040 SY $ 5.00 $ 175,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 121,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 304,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 182,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 1,218,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures 1/2 Bridge on Either End $ 2,835,000 $ 2,835,000 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 10,857,850 Mobilization 5% = $ 542,900 Contineencv 10% = $ 1,140,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 2,508,180 7% $ 175,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 49 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy. Extension to IH -10 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 21,595 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 216 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 648,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 70,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 1,408,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 163,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 2,937,600 4 10" Flex Base 192,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 3,456,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 192,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 768,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 192,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 192,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 86,390 LF $ 25.00 $ 2,159,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 36,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 1,800,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 103,180 SY $ 5.00 $ 515,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 277,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 694,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 416,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 2,777,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 3 Minor Crossings - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 1,890,000 $ 1,890,000 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 20,241,050 Mobilization 5% $ 1,012,100 Contineencv 10% $ 2,125,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 4,675,700 7% $ 327,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 162,000 $ 162,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 50 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHAEFER ROAD W. City Limits to FM 1518 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,534 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 26 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 78,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 92,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 194,400 4 10" Flex Base 12,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 223,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 12,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 49,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 12,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 12,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,070 LF $ 25.00 $ 126,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,630 SY $ 5.00 $ 28,150 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 18,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 47,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 28,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 188,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,228,000 Mobilization 5% $ 61,400 Contineencv 10% $ 129,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,418,400 7% $ 99,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 19,000 $ 19,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 51 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate RAF- BURNETTE Schaefer Rd. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 2,904 - Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 30 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 90,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 279,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 349,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 77,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,420 SY $ 5.00 $ 37,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 30,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 76,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 45,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 305,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,982,400 Mobilization 5% $ 99,200 Contineencv 10% $ 208,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,289,800 7% $ 160,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 108,900 $ 108,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 52 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD W. City Limits to E. of Tates Dr. Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,848 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 19 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 57,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 82,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 178,200 4 10" Flex Base 11,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 199,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,100 SY $ 4.00 $ 44,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,700 LF $ 25.00 $ 92,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 155,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,130 SY $ 5.00 $ 25,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 17,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 42,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 25,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 169,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,099,550 Mobilization 5% $ 55,000 Contineencv 10% $ 115,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,270,100 7% $ 88,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 13,900 $ 13,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 53 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD E. of Tates Dr. to W. of Canopy Bend /Aranda Ln. Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 9,293 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 93 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 20,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 49,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 51,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 51,700 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 51,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 33,040 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 279,000 410,000 892,800 930,600 206,800 51,700 515,000 165,200 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% $ 69,100 5% $ 172,600 3% $ 103,600 20% $ 690,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 1,120,000 $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 1,120,000 1,120,000 5,606,700 280,400 588,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 6,475,900 7% $ 453,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 69,700 $ 69,700 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 54 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD W. of Canopy Bend /Aranda Ln. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 9,082 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 91 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 273,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 22,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 446,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 48,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 873,000 4 10" Flex Base 60,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,090,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 60,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 242,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 60,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 60,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 36,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 908,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 15,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 755,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 23,210 SY $ 5.00 $ 116,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 95,400 11 Traffic Control 5% = $ 238,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 143,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 953,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,194,900 Mobilization 5% $ 309,800 Contineencv 10% $ 650,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,155,200 7% $ 500,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 204,300 $ 204,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 55 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (3) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 792 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 8 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 77,400 4 10" Flex Base 5,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 95,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 21,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,170 LF $ 25.00 $ 79,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 65,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,660 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 8,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 21,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% _ $ 86,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 560,350 Mobilization 5% $ 28,100 Contineencv 10% $ 58,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 647,400 7% $ 45,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 71,300 $ 71,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 56 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (3) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,426 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 15 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 70,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 138,600 4 10" Flex Base 9,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 172,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 9,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 38,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 9,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 9,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,400 SY $ 5.00 $ 42,000 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 15,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 39,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 23,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 155,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,013,050 Mobilization 5% $ 50,700 Contineencv 10% $ 106,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,170,200 7% $ 81,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 128,300 $ 128,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 57 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (4) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector - No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,373 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 14 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 42,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 50,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 104,400 4 10" Flex Base 6,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 122,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 6,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 27,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 6,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 6,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,750 LF $ 25.00 $ 68,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 75,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,050 SY $ 5.00 $ 15,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 10,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 25,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 15,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 102,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 665,500 Mobilization 5% $ 33,300 Contineencv 10% $ 69,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 768,700 7% $ 53,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 72,100 $ 72,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 58 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (4) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,109 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 84,600 4 10" Flex Base 5,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 99,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 22,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,220 LF $ 25.00 $ 55,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 60,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,460 SY $ 5.00 $ 12,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 8,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 20,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 12,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 83,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 539,500 Mobilization 5% $ 27,000 Contineencv 10% $ 56,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 623,200 7% $ 43,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 58,200 $ 58,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 59 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: WEST WARE SEGUIN ROAD W. City Limits to Boeing Dr. Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 3,010 70 None 1 38 Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 108,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 230,400 4 10" Flex Base 14,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 266,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 59,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,020 LF $ 25.00 $ 150,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 165,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,690 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 33,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 224,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,457,250 Mobilization 5% $ 72,900 Contineencv 10% $ 153,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,683,300 7% $ 117,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 60 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate WEST WARE SEGUIN ROAD Boeing Dr. to N/S Connector (5) Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 3,538 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 36 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 108,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 128,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 270,000 4 10" Flex Base 17,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 311,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 17,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 69,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 17,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 17,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,080 LF $ 25.00 $ 177,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 195,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,860 SY $ 5.00 $ 39,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 26,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 65,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 39,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 263,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,810,000 Mobilization 5% $ 90,500 Contineencv 10% $ 190,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,090,600 7% $ 146,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 61 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (S) Lower Seguin Rd. to W. Ware Seguin Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,808 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 177,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 210,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 442,800 4 10" Flex Base 28,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 511,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 28,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 113,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 28,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 28,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 12,910 SY $ 5.00 $ 64,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 43,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 108,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 64,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 432,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,812,150 Mobilization 5% $ 140,700 Contineencv 10% $ 295,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,248,200 7% $ 227,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 304,900 $ 304,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 62 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (S) W. Ware Seguin Rd. to E. Ware Seguin Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,910 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 50 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 150,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 178,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 374,400 4 10" Flex Base 24,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 433,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 24,100 SY $ 4.00 $ 96,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 24,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 24,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,830 LF $ 25.00 $ 245,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 275,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 10,910 SY $ 5.00 $ 54,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 36,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 91,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 55,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 366,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,581,700 Mobilization 5% = $ 129,100 Contineencv 10% $ 271,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,981,900 7% $ 208,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 36,800 $ 36,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 63 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate TRAINER HALE ROAD (N /S) Weir Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 8,765 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 - - - - Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 88 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 264,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 21,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 430,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 46,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 842,400 4 10" Flex Base 58,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,053,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 58,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 234,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 58,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 58,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 35,060 LF $ 25.00 $ 876,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 14,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 730,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 51,610 SY $ 5.00 $ 258,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 95,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 237,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 142,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 949,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,170,550 Mobilization 5% $ 308,600 Contineencv 10% $ 648,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,127,200 7% $ 498,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 394,400 $ 394,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 64 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate TRAINER HALE ROAD (E /W) FM 1518 to Trainer Hale Rd. (N /S) Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 7,973 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 - - - Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 80 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 240,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 19,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 390,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 42,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 766,800 4 10" Flex Base 53,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 957,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 53,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 212,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 53,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 53,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 31,900 LF $ 25.00 $ 797,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 13,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 665,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,370 SY $ 5.00 $ 101,850 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 83,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 209,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 125,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 837,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 750,000 $ 750,000 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,190,350 Mobilization 5% $ 309,600 Contineencv 10% $ 650,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,150,000 7% $ 500,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 59,800 $ 59,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 65 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: WARE SEGUIN ROAD Graytown Rd. to N/S Connector (5) Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 7,128 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 72 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 38,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 39,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 39,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 39,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 25,340 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 216,000 314,000 685,800 712,800 158,400 39,600 395,000 126,700 Pct. Of Paving Item Cost 2% $ 53,000 5% $ 132,500 3% $ 79,500 20% $ 529,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,443,000 Mobilization 5% $ 172,200 Contineencv 10% $ 361,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,976,800 7% $ 278,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 481,100 $ 481,100 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 66 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: EAST WARE SEGUIN ROAD N/S Connector (5) to FM 1518 Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 7,445 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit 14 Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 75 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 39,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 41,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 41,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 41,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 26,470 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 225,000 328,000 716,400 745,200 165,600 41,400 415,000 132,350 Pct. Of Paving Item Cost 2% $ 55,400 5% $ 138,500 3% $ 83,100 20% $ 553,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 100,000 100,000 3,699,750 185,000 388,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,273,300 7% $ 299,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 167,500 $ 167,500 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 67 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate GRAYTOWN ROAD Boeing Dr. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 5,861 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 - - - - - Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard - - Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 31,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 32,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 32,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 32,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,840 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 177,000 258,000 563,400 586,800 130,400 32,600 325,000 104,200 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% - $ 43,600 5% $ 108,900 3% $ 65,400 20% $ 435,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures 3 Minor Crossings $ 300,000 - $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 300,000 300,000 3,130,800 156,600 328,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,616,200 7% $ 253,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 131,900 $ 131,900 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 68 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (6) Ware Seguin Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 2,482 - - Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 25 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 75,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 90,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 189,000 4 10" Flex Base 12,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 219,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 12,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 48,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 12,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 12,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,970 LF $ 25.00 $ 124,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 205,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,140 SY $ 5.00 $ 20,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 19,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 49,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 29,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 197,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,280,150 Mobilization 5% $ 64,100 Contineencv 10% $ 134,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,478,800 7% $ 103,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 130,300 $ 130,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 69 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (8) IH 10 to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 12,302 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 - - - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 124 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 372,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 22,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 442,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 52,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 936,000 4 10" Flex Base 60,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,083,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 60,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 240,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 60,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 60,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 24,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 615,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 20,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 1,025,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,500 SY $ 5.00 $ 102,500 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 97,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 243,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 146,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 975,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,340,750 Mobilization 5% $ 317,100 Contineencv 10% $ 665,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,323,700 7% $ 512,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 645,900 $ 645,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 70 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: BINZ- ENGLEMAN ROAD W. City Limits to Graytown Rd. Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 6,864 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 69 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 18,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 36,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 38,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 38,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 38,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 24,410 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 207,000 368,000 660,600 687,600 152,800 38,200 380,000 122,050 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% $ 52,400 5% $ 130,900 3% $ 78,500 20% $ 523,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - - - $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ - $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,401,350 Mobilization 5% - $ 170,100 Contineencv 10% $ 357,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,928,700 7% $ 275,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 463,300 $ 463,300 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 71 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCENIC LAKE DRIVE Binz - Engleman Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 4,066 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 41 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 123,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 146,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 17,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 309,600 4 10" Flex Base 19,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 358,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 79,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,140 LF $ 25.00 $ 203,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 340,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,780 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 32,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 80,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 48,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 322,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & 111 Construction Subtotal: $ 2,198,000 Mobilization 5% $ 109,900 Contineencv 10% $ 230,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,538,700 7% $ 177,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 Agenda No. 14 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Subject: C• � 1 Engineering Resolution 17 -R -94 -- — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing additional expenditures not to exceed $1,168,685 with Capital Excavation Company for the reconstruction of Schertz Parkway between Maske Road and Live Oak Road. The Schertz Parkway reconstruction project design relied upon as- constructed information and field observation and surveying. The as- constructed plans showed the existing curb height being a total of 121/2 inches, with 7 inches above ground and 5 I/2 inches imbedded. This arrangement would be stable enough to reconstruct the roadway without having to replace all the curb. It also provided enough curb height below the road surface to dowel the curb into the new concrete pavement. Dowelling the curb to the new pavement provides additional stability to the curb and helps ensure a watertight seal between the pavement and the curb. The additional curb stability is especially important along the east side of Schertz Parkway because of the multi -use pathway. Reconstruction activities for the multi -use pathway could cause the curb to move or tip over if the curb is not anchored to the new concrete pavement. Preventing water intrusion along the face of the curb will help eliminate a common cause of roadway failure. The assumed 5 %2" imbedded depth of the curb would have provided the minimum amount of imbedded depth to allow for dowelling and accomplish both. goals. The design for the reconstruction project therefore assumed that the existing curb could remain. It would not be necessary to replace the curb, saving some anticipated construction costs. On September 1.2, 2017 . Council awarded a construction contract to Capital. Excavation. Company for reconstruction of Schertz Parkway. The bid amount was $934,258.85 and Council authorized a maximum, not to exceed amount of $1,027,685 (the bid amount plus 10% contingency). The estimated project completion date for the project is April 6, 2018. Capital Excavation began some exploratory work as they were preparing to begin construction of the project. Capital did a small excavation in front of the curb to verify the asphalt thickness. When they did, they discovered that the curb imbedding was only 2 1/2 inches instead of the expected 5 %2 inches. Capital informed City Staff of their findings. Staff coordinated with Capital Excavation Company and had additional small excavations in front of the curb performed at random locations to verify the curb imbedding depth. The results of these additional tests indicated that the actual curb height is approximately 9 %2 inches with an imbedded depth of approximately 2 %2 inches. At only one location tested did the curb imbedded depth approach 5 1/2 inches. Staff consulted with the Design Engineer for the project since the shallower imbedded depth precluded dowelling of the curb to the concrete pavement and called into question the stability of the curb. To address this lesser imbedded curb depth, multiple options were evaluated by the Design Engineer. Options included simply proceeding with the planned construction but eliminate dowelling the curb; raising the finished surface of the concrete pavement to allow for dowelling the curb; replace only the exterior curb, save the median cub, increase the cross slope of the pavement, and dowel the new and existing curb; and replace all the curb. After evaluating the pros and cons of each option, the Design Engineer and Staff are recommending replacement of all sections of the curb not stable enough to eliminate doweling and have less than 5 1/2 inches imbedded depth. The "worst case" scenario would be to replace all the curb. The estimated cost for full curb replacement is approximately $141,000. While the project contract was awarded with some contingency of just under $94,000, not enough contingency exists for the "worst case" scenario. It was also recognized that the existing curb appears very stable. This apparent stability could mean that it is possible to construct the project as planned, with just eliminating the dowelling of the curb. The actual curb stability would not be known until project construction is further along. Therefore, if the City could plan for /allow for the worst case scenario for the project now, construction could proceed on the project and work could be adjusted "on the fly" as needed to avoid any contractor delays. This could be accomplished by increasing the maximum, not to exceed amount of the contract by $141,000. Funding to allow for such an increase is available from the excess 2009 Bond project funding. It is possible that this additional funding will not be needed. If it isn't needed, the funding would be available for other projects once the Schertz Parkway reconstruction project is complete. In light of the fact that the curbs were not constructed per the as- constructed plans, staff is recommending that the contingency funds not be used to cover any portion of the curb costs so that those funds are available for more typical contingency issues or less expensive problems arising from future items discovered that are based on what was constructed not matching the as constructed plans. Staff performed an additional cost analysis for the worst case scenario (replacing all the curb) with all the proposals received for the project. Account for the additional cost of curb replacement did not alter the lowest bid cost result or the proposal ranking scores. Capital Excavation Company would still have the highest ranked proposal for the reconstruction project if full curb replacement had been included in the proposed contract. Goal To provide for a worst case scenario of having to replace all the curb on the Schertz Parkway Reconstruction Project without delaying construction activity or contractor progress. Community Benefit Reconstruction of this segment of Schertz Parkway will remove the currently failing pavement on the roadway, improving the ride quality of the roadway and reducing the ongoing patching costs and efforts associated with maintaining the existing section in serviceable condition. By adding a turn lane to Live Oak Road at the intersection of Schertz Parkway, the project increases the operational efficiency of the intersection, reducing delay times for motorists and easing congestion on Live Oak Road at the intersection. Summary of Recommended Action Increase the maximum, not to exceed contract amount for the Schertz Parkway Reconstruction Project to $1,1.68,685 (previously authorized amount of $1,027,685 plus $141,000). FISCAL IMPACT Project is funding by a combination of excess 2009 Bond project funding ($327,685) and 2017 Bond proceeds ($700,000). There is a total of $677,525 available from the 2009 Bond project funding available for this project, which is more than adequate to provide for the additional $140,000 worst case scenario. Staff recommends Council approve Resolution 17 -R -94 and increase the do not exceed amount to $1,168,685 for the Schertz Parkway Reconstruction from Maske Road to Live Oak Road. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -R -94 Pictures Curb Variation. Typical Curb RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -94 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS INCREASING THE BUDGET EXPENDITURES FOR THE CONTRACT WITH CAPITAL EXCAVATION COMPANY RELATING TO THE RECONSTRUCTION OF SCHERTZ PARKWAY FROM MASKE ROAD TO LIVE OAK ROAD WHEREAS, The City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City increase the maximum expenditure amount for the construction contract relating to the Schertz Parkway Reconstruction from Maske Road to Live Oak Road; and WHEREAS, unforeseen conditions were encountered as project construction began that could require the existing curb to be replaced; and WHEREAS, the City wants to prepare for replacement of the existing curb beforehand to avoid any construction delays; and WHEREAS, excess 2009 Bond project funding is available to provide for the replacement of the existing curb. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS W: Section 1. The City Council hereby increases the not to exceed amount for the construction contract with Capital. Excavation Company for Schertz Parkway Reconstruction form Live Oak Road to Maske Road to $1,168,685. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 24th day of October, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50506221.1 - 2 - Agenda No. 15 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -A -44 — Consideration and/or action approving an ordinance confirming and approving a boundary agreement establishing the municipal boundary between the City of Schertz and the City of Cibolo for property located within the Homestead development (First Reading) BACKGROUND The Homestead master plan (previously known as Nortex Farms) was originally approved on June 17, 2014 as part of the adoption of the Planned Development District (PDD). This master planned development covers approximately 667 acres, with approximately 433 acres being in Schertz and 234 acres in Cibolo. A future collector roadway that is oriented east /west is to be located near the current boundary between the two cities. The staff from both cities and the developer agree that adjusting the boundary between the two cities to follow the proposed road will be beneficial to both cities as it will serve to clearly mark the city limits, identify roadway maintenance responsibilities, and keep areas in Homestead from being split between the cities. This a previous version of this ordinance was approved on first reading by Schertz City Council on July 11, 2017. It was also concurrently taken on the same day to the Cibolo City Council who did not approve the agreement. There were questions from Cibolo City Council regarding the transfer of land to Schertz. Since that time staff representatives from both cities have met and revised the proposed roadway ownership to switch the roadway segments. The current proposal is for Schertz to transfer land to Cibolo so that Cibolo will be responsible for the round -a -bout and roadway section to the east. Additionally, Cibolo will transfer land to Schertz so that Schertz is responsible for the roadway section west of the round -a -bout. This current agreement was presented at the October 10, 2017 Cibolo City Council meeting where it was approved. Goal The goal of this boundary agreement is to adjust the city limits between the City of Schertz and the City of Cibolo to follow the east west collector road that is planned in the Homestead Master Development Plan. City Council Memorandum Page 2 Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. This boundary adjustment will provide for clear delineation of roadway ownership and maintenance responsibilities and will provide a logical city limit line. Summary of Recommended Action Approval of Ordinance 1.7 -A -44 adjusting the boundary in this area so that the city limits will follow the outside edges of the street right -of -way as shown in the attached exhibit. Schertz would be transferring approximately 0.7139 acres of land to Cibolo and Cibolo would be transferring approximately 6.847 acres of land to Schertz. There are no planned developable lots being transferred in this agreement. The areas being transferred out of Schertz into Cibolo are shown on the master plan to be right -of -way. The areas being transferred out of Cibolo into Schertz are shown on the master plan to be right -of -way, private park/open space, and a narrow frontage portion of the townhome section of the Homestead development. The boundary agreement would place the roadway section west of the round -a -bout in Schertz' city limits and the city would be responsible for future maintenance of the road. The rounda- bout and roadway section to the east would be in Cibolo's city limits. The split section ownership of the roadway provides for clear ownership of the roadway and allows each city to bear part of the responsibility for future roadway maintenance. UMWO • ' • On RM RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of ordinance no. 1.7 -A -44. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 1.7 -A -44 Boundary Agreement New Proposed Boundary Exhibit July 17 Old Boundary Proposal ORDINANCE NO. 1.7 -A -44 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ CONFIRMING AND APPROVING A BOUNDARY AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ AND THE CITY OF CIBOLO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Schertz and City of Cibolo (collectively referred to as the "Cities ") are neighboring and adjacent home rule municipalities that are empowered to establish and expand their corporate boundaries through annexation; and WHEREAS, the Cities share common corporate boundaries, and such commonality shall increase as a result of future annexations by both Cities; and WHEREAS, the Cities, by virtue of their inherent authority as home rule municipalities, and state statutes, including Texas Local Government Code Section 43.031, may agree on the Cities mutual boundaries; provided that such agreement does not change either City's existing boundaries of any area by more than 1000 feet; and WHEREAS, in particular, the City Charter of the City of Schertz, Sections 1.02 (a) and (b) authorizes City Council, by ordinance, to annex territory lying adjacent to the City, with or without the consent of the owners or inhabitants thereof, thereby extending and enlarging the bounds and limits of the City in any manner provided by law; and, to extend the City's extraterritorial jurisdiction boundaries in such manner as provided by state law; provided that a map depicting such changes is maintained by the City Secretary and the City Manager in a public place; and WHEREAS, in accordance with such authority the Cities seek to avoid conflicts and uncertainty relative to the extent and location of their respective corporate boundaries; and the potential for litigation involving the same; and WHEREAS, the Cities, desire to approve, a municipal boundary clarification agreement which is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" (hereafter referred to as the "Boundary Agreement "); and, which confirms and adjusts the Cities boundaries as authorized by this Ordinance and a similar ordinance passed by Cibolo; and WHEREAS, the developer of the Homestead Subdivision, as owner of the real property affected by the boundary adjustment reflected in the Boundary Agreement, has requested the boundary adjustment and has agreed to pay any recordation fees incurred by the City to accomplish the requested boundary adjustment; and Page 1 WHEREAS, the Cities find and determine it necessary for the health, safety and welfare of their residents to confirm boundaries and make certain agreements and adjustments regarding their respective corporate boundaries. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The legislative findings set out above, are hereby adopted and incorporated herein for all purposes. SECTION 2. The Boundary Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "A" is hereby approved and fully incorporated in this Ordinance. The City Manager is hereby authorized to execute an agreement in substantive form as Exhibit "A ", and such other documents that are reasonably necessary to facilitate the purpose of this Ordinance. SECTION 3. The City Manager is hereby authorized and directed to have the official map of the City's corporate limits revised to reflect the revisions authorize under the Boundary Agreement; provide all required notifications, of the changes to the corporate limits made effective by this ordinance, to appropriate state and county officials; and take such other necessary and proper action, in accordance with the laws of this state and the City Charter to memorialize the revision to the City of Schertz's corporate boundaries as established by the Boundary Agreement. Approved on first reading the 24th day of October, 2017. PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED on final reading the 14th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Page 2 EXHIBIT "A" TO ORDINANCE THE "CIBOLO /SCHERTZ MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY AGREEMENT" Page 3 STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § CITIES OF CIBOLO AND SCHERTZ MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY AGREEMENT This MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY AGREEMENT ( "Agreement "), dated , 2017 ( "Effective Date "), made by and between the CITY OF CIBOLO, a Texas home rule municipality with corporate boundaries extending within Guadalupe County, Texas ( "Cibolo "), and the CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas home rule municipality with corporate boundaries extending within Bexar, Comal and Guadalupe Counties, Texas ( "Schertz "). Whereas, Texas Government Code Section 43.031 authorizes adjacent municipalities to mutually agree to change their boundaries of areas that are less than 1000 feet in width; Whereas, the developer of the Homestead Subdivision (hereinafter "requestor ") has requested the boundary adjustment described in this Agreement; and Whereas, the requestor is the owner of all of the real property that is the subject to the boundary adjustment, and has confirmed its commitment to pay any recordation costs required to memorialize the boundary adjustment; and Whereas, the Cibolo City Council approved this agreement and authorized its execution by the passage of Ordinance No. , on , 2017; and Whereas, the Schertz City Council approved this agreement and authorized its execution by the passage of Ordinance No. , on 2017. NOW THEREFORE FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION the sufficiency and receipt which is confessed by Cibolo and Schertz, (collectively the "Cities ") said Cities do hereby agree as follows: SECTION 1. Boundary changes authorized. The change of boundaries between Schertz and Cibolo applies to the land described by field notes designated as Tract I/Exhibit "A"; Tract 2 /Exhibit `B "; Tract 3 /Exhibit "C "; and Tract 4 /Exhibit "D" as follows: (a) From Cibolo to Schertz. (i) Tract 1. As described in Exhibit "A ", Tract 1, a 1.645 acre tract, is transferred from the City of Cibolo's corporate limits to the City of Schertz's corporate limits. (ii) Tract 3. As described in Exhibit "C ", Tract 3, a 5.202 acre tract, is transferred from the City of Cibolo's corporate limits to the City of Schertz's corporate limits. (b) From Schertz to Cibolo. (i) Tract 2. As described in Exhibit "B ", Tract 2, a 0.0029 acre tract, is transferred from the City of Schertz's corporate limits to the City of Cibolo's corporate limits. r- (ii) Tract 4. As described in Exhibit "D ", Tract 4, a 0.711 acre tract, is transferred from the City of Schertz's corporate limits to the City of Cibolo's corporate limits. SECTION 2. Boundary Agreement Clarification Map Approve. The Boundary Agreement Clarification Map attached hereto as Exhibit "E is hereby approved by the Cities and acknowledged to be a legal and binding document depicting the municipal corporate limits changes between the City of Cibolo and City of Schertz, as authorized under Section 1, hereto. SECTION 3. Amendment to Cities Corporate and Extraterritorial Maps. Within sixty days of the Effective Date of this Agreement the City of Cibolo and City of Schertz shall take such actions as shall be reasonably necessary to amend and revise their respective official maps, and other related documentation to reflect the boundary between the Cities established by the Boundary Agreement Clarification Map. SECTION 4. Mutual Cooperation. The Cities shall mutually cooperate, to the extent reasonably necessary, to: (a) notify appropriate state and county officials, including but not limited to the Guadalupe County Clerk and Tax Appraiser, of any change in corporate boundary caused by the adoption of the Boundary Agreement Clarification Map; (b) cause this Agreement to be recorded in the Public Records of Guadalupe County, Texas and split those recordation costs not paid by the requestor, evenly; (c) coordinate with such real property owners whose property may be effected by the adoption of the Boundary Agreement Clarification Map. SECTION 5. Term. This Agreement, and the Boundary Agreement Clarification Map, shall remain in full force and effect until such time that it is amended or rescinded by the mutual agreement of the Cities, as evidenced by the passage of an Ordinance by the Cities respective Counsels. SECTION 5. Severability of Provisions. If any clause or provision of this Agreement is held invalid, illegal or unenforceable under present or future federal, state or local laws, then and in that event it is the intention of the Cities that such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other clause or provision hereof and that the remainder of this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable clause or provision was never contained herein. SECTION 6. Entire Agreement This Agreement constitutes the final and entire Agreement between the parties hereto and contains all of the terms and conditions agreed upon. No other agreements, oral or otherwise, regarding the subject matter of this Agreement shall be deemed to exist or to bind the parties hereto unless same be in writing, dated subsequent to the date hereof, and duly executed by the parties. SECTION 7. Captions and Exhibits. The captions contained in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only, and in no way limit or enlarge the terms and /or conditions of this Agreement. All Exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated by reference herein for all purposes and include the following: (a) Exhibit "A ", field notes of Tract 1, a 1.645 acre tract. (b) Exhibit "B ", field notes of Tract 2, a 0.0029 acre tract. (c) Exhibit "C ", field notes of Tract 3, a 5.202 acre tract. (d) Exhibit "D ", field notes of Tract 4, a 0.71.1 acre tract. (e) Exhibit "E" the boundary clarification map. SECTION 8. MULTIPLE ORIGINALS This Agreement may be executed in multiple originals. The Cities agree that it is not necessary for each or every party to execute the same physical document. This Agreement binds Cibolo and Schertz upon execution by an authorized representative of Cibolo and of Schertz. (The remainder of this page intentionally remains blank and the signature page follows.) Page 3 EXECUTED in duplicate originals to be effective as of the date set forth above. Robert Herrera, City Manager Peggy Cimics, City Secretary State of Texas County of Guadalupe This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017 by Robert Herrera, City Manager of the City of Cibolo, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said municipality. (Personalized Seal) Page 4 Notary Public's Signature EXECUTED in duplicate originals to be effective as of the date set forth above. CITY OF SCHERTZ John Kessel, City Manager _ /r N -M Brenda Dennis, City Secretary State of Texas County of Guadalupe This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017 by John Kessel, City Manager of the City of Schertz, a Texas home rule municipal corporation, on behalf of said municipality. (Personalized Seal) Page 5 Notary Public's Signature Page 7 �L'II3 Page 11 Page 12 911212017 c l : 1 inch" ' 1, feet 5.22 AC nd TWA + 52017// wv ,226585:'.kr. U49.01,T4aa C?C� ? ft. Page 13 Page 14 Page 15 EXHIBIT "E", TO THE BOUNDARY AGREEMENT (Boundary Clarification Map: Tracts 1, 29 3 and 4) S&E,AMNUS AFFF 6ASEO ON 7NESTATERANE COUff HATE SYSTEM &STAELOSHED FOR TNF TE`YJ93:aY1IJ7At GM= FIIY'L1P.1LiREE i L.r r d264 .,NORTH AME,R IMN DATUM fMD) OF 1983. F 2 NO YIN : FC %Maa }TW±vxt'fACXVdia:FfFAF RitF OF SURVEY S REP- ';:HEf:CEfx PNt]FE'A't7"Y IS FIT TLir "Y,XAis$:+'45CSE7 € °tlAWVaPd'tG TO BE O1U TS6E ME 9.2% AMISUAL CHANCE FL iPo„AS EI nAlbcrFU %+A+ FEMAFLOW AAAP230 OF 4&G GO&Iri1'@.NlSIF la ` PA ALL NO, 4918 TOP 22JJF DATED NO 1 Om7 SITE SCALE5 4 THE TRACT 3TV71N NERENJTS SUMCTTOALL CITY OF 5W SiCAdEV rZ, CIrV OFChROCO.ANO tVAN LUPF COLWIT' i S UFTFS AYP RQUAI1aS ENERE PREPARED FDR MIS SLIN'YEY LOCATfON MAP S A- UPEAa'YFWS SVEV da' rim POUND YTI,m uROD WRAS NOTED NOT-TO-SCALE 7 AID"MER.' SHOWN R.ENEOMA E FEAT OURRE 9T rUADA LUPFC, OrJNYYRPP "SALDY,VTRfCrkMOgDR5ANO ":A WR : SET 1&'IRON ROD Y DIA BLUE GAP OFF(RAL PV0VC RECORAS OF 6OAT LUPF!EU ITY, TEXAS, $TA PED `tTbSCDt1SY W0' fkFACRES p .m awkwS TIM, VNKS R7 AUSVY SCHAIA6 i . � MELVINW 4 SCENPC FrttLS, i+avfiP :. �' ,'VOL. 1413 PD, 497% '� RttSYa SE:F968A@ (ROL ?F 646) ° _ ac aav ssra _I-- -- _ rRE $c FLesF 0, 0029 OF AN A RE C T ..,, : Faa (rs T4 g"Ze7fi SC7 FT-) \ P.PS (TRACT 31 �raaAVNPS n xx t!n. C,NArTa) r� TRACT T 3 } I. f6;7V111FF r - 0,T 11 OF AN gVOL T5J PS, IWI ,a tt =�,, ,fx�ru A RETRA T 4 rF T T ACr"T 3 a TRACT 1 �- 20 2 ACRE TRACT ca � PIE T,& fTRACT rp 7.645 ACRD' TRACT TP26.599 SO- Fr) xA rsaac .Ary F.LYr- (7RdCT Z) (71,85,61AQ, FT): P ACRE.... F.c3C Ci 9) p43R6.+iCRE.S X ERUM 614 PG, OM (VOL 1w Pol J$011 121 MACRE TRACT xF wTONTICN FP _ TaT�� � 6�6Aa t � �r Np i tk' 4 22338,5 AON'iS d8OACEIF6 SPA#4G JUSI:LFM*CA L8Y :. RA`'4 FdP {;8 VALLEY ( ` ANDMARYK @, IRSA ORND ESTATES !{ . 1:tftP4 4C 00, Fk {yt34 €uFa PG. Bu`"8J F A"!'P3 3a "4i (VOA. F'x+ 74,?jyM fi T _ STAt'f CtF7€?J43, COUNTY Of L§LI'Aft 1iE6kLSkk:,E1PfL, DG SERsHS'!„k4Y f8CY Ti9.AT �r .1..GBA,y`A ,=Ef„ Tri.�ua.cNGAiaa'SUR'7CV MtrSPAiFta}FRQdtib,P3a SAS C7atl THE q"s t'YUPt[10Y FEikSC?GYS 0, TUBA A S00FL %,.. €Air �FR.1S1ElZT' 41ftAL4mDDjmvEyQm NO,5672 >*Fr xm w MAIL 9P)AfN 1NEE SCOM C . AT' 0FSURVEPGStW201T �cT �0'1ND.�T4Y`s71 °v`Ey0F .d a.F.as.aexF r,TAC?afret+tT;CaadkT -� ?NAC-r t AO TRA "w T'lF,a.V,9£RF T72r9CiBtYNL' £Att£i+%4AG Page 17 P? SE SASEE ON THE STATE ASAKECOCROINATE 9LTSHEC FOR T44E T NA,S S{ UILI GFNNIRAL ?<INF MERTCAN DATL1i3& {AY D) OF 9°On MMiTMENT PROVIDED ATTM OF SURVEY '3 Gti Pfix7PE7d7 r'75 IN ZONE X, A,fs ikETERiSitr'' F w THE R.2~3 ANNUAL CHANCE rLOOOPLAK AS FEMA FLOW AIAP 2317 OF 4'367 COMMMITY t' VCO230F, VATW MOVEMSCR z aVF SITE IS -ITY iHOWN HEREON SMCEC f TO AU OF °OF`{:dRC 0 0L)AiZ Ufflf f=MrY IN�G:RESTPJCTIONS. 90LIAUS WERE PAEPARED rOR THiS SURVEY, _ LOCATION MAP VSAAE V7- OtAMErER AESAR WN A RL47E GAF d4$URVF'#AO -' NOT-TO-SCATE, . i19i5WN 0TERREM ARE KA CUR RENT SYMBOL LEGEND 3IV NTY APPRAISAL DISST M T RELIORDS AhA:7 X EC"°+ORDS OF CCOADALUPE t=:4UNrY, TES 0 P'XR Fi'UW, :077- IRONFtPrOORASNOLTM SA SET M- WON ROU WTFH A RLUE CAP STA,MPED'KA VSURVi5WNC.... 0,7s4GRE5 ASEL4T. 4"r'.A a9Y,TRYF �sf A+'AR RG'USYA SChW'A8 ,.�. , (VOL #4t3P6 4`9N 522. d8'AC7d' TRAIT y'VOL, 1413Fo 497k 'LF . ..,A _ ..— _......_ . .: .,._.... . m -T oRwFN9R, LA {UGC ZOMd 2861. a?. a TRACT 3 202 ACRE TRACT (226,599 SO, F"T.) �^ cV�w P+d� i�gy d3d� ,r 6—_ 38 Sd E to $24 IS ACRE FRAGT ' 309° p 20r406"4206) rCRALDMIE tf j. mm... KAMM t t (VOL, 643 pa AW) CAL; : 1'°=100' 100, SY d9V M SL7 RUBY SGITW`AN' - g3R (VOL Td P3po 4577) /rye } p SLR. 0 �nyA41 wp.y,y .{,r+�. -gyp' d T'SJ'1'�.e S 4 .a4t.CJy9 6672„ \_0,711 '��e3V PRACPsC'C`tiACT si =N- TOW7'NER, LP ACRE TRACT pLTG. Xatslm4dr iq SQ, f=7" (.. (30,976 ) vra Padda '. )a TA GFdC7t2Lk k37i'Cv) CNCi#;ZY W"?r 41439 VV544T=0.M „) 133 14 ? �IrsV , SSY`6R2x8`tM.;� 410075, 1 S,4#"f73Y}4'W 4- T416- N4WYV40SV &11 Nor3s`G6°66+ z"'s'EW N48°3440%M.- 2389' LIM Tad.$. L LE TH GIREC-TON 0 6v34& �.fi35 a97 S'W L2 � i4984 '.S 59 °#V2'89'Sfd t 0 u 293.36 _523 7i95"6W i L4 176,94 -17W21V L5 .8932 N #7 23'3SV �LiS 4322 M-53-19-W: Cli4lig RY SUf3V Y°07 . 985 At°fi TRAC r NFJNG CARE, ; R 1 r 6 /M STATE OF TEXAS C. ".. GfjL NTS 9P 6EXA,R; I TERM A. SEIDEL, iL.,. .. .. iiC15 90UE&#i N5W4RWE`a 9+UAS PR'E &AfiEb FROM�AN d4k ,EfPSiL C3N HS tsflE311RStA &V GgYtSgN'S a:RkKtls&6 UN TlTa4Y „St7}ViS"i✓N, t F.0'w#Po7E TSfld?Ek.KTW"$E7t�19M2SFSGLMhi GATE OF SURVM 0511 O17 EE4IECT NO,, 17AF2.*S .�..,�..,. ,' 4 SHEET "'. ,7d7F C IY -I- vll' IN \� /��' / , 1 , i ... ....... 7 ...... .... ... .......... . -'�` OOF vj 00, R, PROPOSED AREA TO BE C/TY F j TRANSFERRED FROM CITY OF CIBOLO TO CITY OF SCHERTZ SCHERTZ C17-Y 01c S PROPOSED AREA TO BE PROPOSED AREA TO BE TRANSFERRED FROM TRANSFERRED FROM CITY OF CITY OF SCHERTZ TO C/ 7-y 0,p CIBOLO TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY OF CIBOLO OLO i anmw N W f Aftwomm a I M 111UTIM a rqwffwA a WWWRO W a --.2100001000 i' HOMESTEAD CITY LIMIT TRANSFER EXHIBIT lll--._,__ �I, Vii;; i LEGEND 0 j 23 0 200' 6666WENNIn SCALE: 1" = 200' "0 BE ZOM 'TO D C17-YOF,3 C/ /EAR 7z . . ..... .. C/ 7-y OF C18 0L 0 MALONE * WHEELER SINCE INC 1995 CIVIL ENGINEERING * DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING * PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5113 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 260 Austin, Texas 78735 Phone: (512) 899-0601 Fax: (512) 899-0655 Firm Registration No. F-786 EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE ■ PROPOSED CITY LIMITS LINE PROP. ROW ----------- PROP. UNIT LINE PROP. AREA TO BE TRANSFERRED TO CITY OF SCHERTZ PROP. AREA TO BE TRANSFERRED TO CITY OF CIBOLO j 23 0 200' 6666WENNIn SCALE: 1" = 200' "0 BE ZOM 'TO D C17-YOF,3 C/ /EAR 7z . . ..... .. C/ 7-y OF C18 0L 0 MALONE * WHEELER SINCE INC 1995 CIVIL ENGINEERING * DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING * PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5113 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 260 Austin, Texas 78735 Phone: (512) 899-0601 Fax: (512) 899-0655 Firm Registration No. F-786 f""I "',", , , I ",_ , 11, � I I ,';i, I I , ",',,I I , I I,", " 11, "', � - I", 11 11, 'I"- "", - 7,1 f I j ,I I -­­_,,�,,,_j - I - ��N' 1Y N1 I "11,, "" ', - ,,,,,____, .- """'e! Il" \1 I y- -­-­ � f ,l , I - , "", I ­` , ( I .... .... .. , , ", " l, 'e," "" ", / I, / � �1­111_11_1_111 ­111 . ..... - i 1, ,,4 ,`,'� I / l40 / I ,� . . ......... . �, - I , I, -­­­­­j � � � `­111' I ..... I-P14, "I I 11 '11,', "", \ ` ..... . t I ") I I i , , I �, i rf,") I ?I ,�z­ � I , _j_____ � " 0 1, " I I, N, � � i � .... . ....... - I I 14", ',�` , I%'11, I'll(" , /I " I ,I I - - 7-1 '­___1 f� .... ... ­­­ I 'y,l, "'A )/ / / ?-,, ", ,�"" I - , I -, I , I I, '­:""'i ... , - ........ . I 1- =-- " if If I " , --- I -1, / 11,,, I'll � 111v ;1_.___,__1_1,,___ 11", ... __-A ­­ .. . .... � i "', I, // N, ,,,,,, ,,, ""', i vle I ,,, "i" N, "'e, ,,,, � , " l'�, "I ... I, I ,,,, 'i, , ,, I � !� , I I � i I I k�,�,,,,i � I ", " � i" ,,, ", - ) , , " " , " , " I ,� "", "I "­ �,,111 -- 17-1-111-411-, � , , ___ IN ,� e // ,,,,, 11 ,,, �,',', ,N ,,, .11", """", � ... . ..... "Itz" If I 'I ­11' ,--,--- ­_ - ___­ - , I ,11 11 e i ,:,� I " ­-, ,,, 11, ,I , I .L ", 1, , "" " /� / " ,,,,, 'A', ", __If, " I , 11, \ I, , -- i, _­ -- � -- - I -, 1,,_r�,,�, / 'I, /11,111-,�11--�--,,,,,,,�-"�:,-",�,,,',:,,,/I A ,,',/,,',' ,I,>,,, " I , __ /� ­,,"'­­,,,, � " 11 , � -11 " N / 'N' - - __ �,&, ,,­,`,,� ", L ,'I I -1- "". , I �g " - - - � __ - ,/ , , 'K "" 11 , 'I ,,,,�,ee` - ,I, , ,,,,,,,,' , '111 " IN, ,� 'III, I � 1 ,� , - ,�,i Ir I t I _L , "Ifi"'s I, ,,, I., -11"', / / ,� IN "," � � I ") Vl­­ __-, I" " 11,� I / """, N, IN I," 'I, ,", I 11, "y4l. 1 , \ Ili Il " I -J, I � "'t'l, � t I / "', '�,,, 1111-- �, I � , /I I , "", " ,/ / / "" �I,�,,,, ,,, " _,, , I I/ ; __'�` e ,I X / I/ ,N� / ,,,,,,, ,,,,,, "I"., ,,,,, , - / , N '.4"", "', .. ..... , " `11 yf` , , _,l / I""'I, - . I ,,, I/ ��11,�,,,,,, " ,4", . ..... - , ,11 l ,, "',/ � ­ , � ,,,, 11 " " �, ", '4 \ "IN" 11,1. - 11- ("c" i I -11 � , 1 I __-, 11 � 'A I , , N 17, �, , " I , I- � I � 11--,", � ....... ? ,Illy I -, �, Cl ",I I I .5fifew":."IT \ crj \ ", -1 `111 -L ­­­'�\( C,,,,�� k ,,,, >/ , If ,,I,,, , ,�e, I'll, " 11, II ;', ­'I , _,_,_­- ::_ ... ...... ­'_ _" ,"I, � -, - .... . . .... - %111�' , '4 i�­,­ , I I f I­ "Ill ", , � I I 1-1-1 , 'e's __ 'I - " I / 11 ?,� �,,` I , 41, " " ,,� 'r ,"� . . .. . " - - "I'l � I , J I , " -, / j / 4 // �111 . .... .. ,::::: . . .. ...... ­l) y ,,, :,,�­",", , ,, / N' � � ,I,, ", 1i " k - 1-11.1 V­ ""' .... .. �, , , / ... � c,i) � N"', " ; , // " � "" ,` " \, S 0, �, �____ """ - , , �,� i I I'll I , N"4, , /, I I "y / I "Y I " I , LIO \ I", ,'_1111', - I - ... .... ("JI ­­­-, I " I , , 11 """, 'r"�" ", I - 11 111U I 1111-1-111 ... � ... ,71 I -,,,,,,f1,\,,, , 4 Q " If, / ,"', 'N ,,,, ,- __ I � " I ee N / It ""I / / // p, , ,I , ,,_ � X, , V� 0", "DII ,, �,,,­"` "1111-111, __ ,_-T I 1-1 I � I 11 i ,� I 3111111. I - "'i , � f I I ,/ I,, CI) k I I � I f, ell 1, , I 1 7" j / / / ef, ,,, I "I"., " "" ,� 1� I If / ...... I", ,,, i7lll, fl, 11,", "'I , ,� , _" I I ,,, I­N) ,,, I ", '\ , ,­A, "', .... ,; I � � I t """, � I - , Ii �\,, llv%�17 1 / "', I � N I I'll, / I \ I %. " I ,"If '. I I , f , I " I II I " I eLci "I'," N ­11-111"i "11-1, 11 11 ly, 11 ""', � ­ A ­11111 I ""i, 1z""', I I", 1 r, ) , ,,, I ", \, /,( / " - 11, I I "" , ,,,, j ,,,,, , "I" 1. , I p I I p 1�', ) /1,111 ­ ,", / I I, ,,,, %, I i ,,, , ,,,, 1, 11 [,� . ... it p" I I , I 'p, e 1, " 1, /I Ilk I',, / ,, j, 11,'k ,,/ I !" , \ I .... ... ', ie­1,­_ i '' / � ­­ "'4, ,,, 11", I ,,,, -,I4, 11", " I 1, 1�1­ . ...... .. S , " , , I v, _ " " I I � I " � I If ­.- I III 44 ,%� , I, III ", i 'I, Ql�) I T ? I , , , � I , " , / ,_ ...... 1', "I - 11 I ""I "I IN I 11, 110le \ , 1, 1111- , _�, , 'if , - . .. - .... ", re ... III " , I I �' i `/ I , If N, ...... . ,,, � ,,, ­1 \ ...... � i -,, j � � '11111- IN N I 'I, 't , , i"", I _" , .'III 0 I "':':,,Z� I -1- I ? 11"j / y""I'l I 1, I ,,,� I 1'1� ,,, 0I Ii /,�' , '­ - � Q,f � I "`�, I ", , "I" I _.,,-e- "'ill' �1 �t__I_ ...... � J"j � " I /" I . . .. l ,,,, ,/ - -1-111I r h 11 �4 "I, � - ",4, k e.j " f f , / 1 "'I IN`111 I; I , III f i ­1 `,111'41,01 1, � I " \ ,,, - I1111111 "I,/ IN ", 7­1­­ 'Il - I/ �,,i ",,""", / I,� _1%, \ 4� " � .4,1 , , , � " � ", \ - "! �_-­ l 7_: - ­­ -1-4-1 1111-11--, "" I f I ­­ t"11111 11 , , I I " I "'�" I ` 111L , - ", � .11 ""' I "", - , I ,,I "Ic.", I � y,r", ... � .... 1, " I " ", , t; z ,�, �/ 9 11",­­11 ­:­­­­"_ I. .... 11 �,fi ,,,, " , - - - -1.1-, "', - " 1411" \ " % - ,,, I ... . .... "I _- __ , '1I � ­-­ ­-T I . ... ....... e \11, ,", ,,, ,,I " I f;,", , "", I., I I, / " / / / / ,,,, ,., ,_ 11 1\ ""'11" \11111", ", \ <:,)", I , , ,� - '­­1111, , / , / fee 7", - "I'll"11111111 r/ !""'��:) / . ....... I � V1 - I /), "I'll, N I � , / "" ,,I/"/ e, ia�,11 ,140 - 11 'e, I'll �,_ ,I I -1 - I If /' - 4' , 1, i I " " , ____ � I 111"', I "i f I, I ,I/ f I ,/ / If N' I 1-11, a I/ "" I ­___ ...... 7,_� �, " I �,%) 1, I i-ll" , I - ... ...... �r­�N " "Ill � I\ I "Ill I /I I," I'\ ,­ I, , V�,_',111 /I e, / 1 ­-- r . . ...... ­­,r �, . ....... I "' " / I us "I", ", 111-1-111"I"11111"' """ 1.11 - I ­, 11 � .. . .... ... - , ,-,"c"! Y-v I " \ I , - " -, '­ k ,,,_,;, fI - ---- , � I I ""I", ,�,,�(,,',>,I,,,,",,,,,�,,�,�,�""�"'', I, �"":"' " - , , ,',­,',_'­ . . . ....... . ..... - ,_�_�"::I:-_- :_� ,�, 1,:__1 , "" ? I "I", ,'I, �, If - .. .. .. :��­ �z " 11-111I I , I, ""', v ,��, ,I I ....... _­ " � , , - cl, , z I " """ k,,,,� / "I / IN ""') � _'4 "" 1 "", I " I I I I ,� � - ­­ elt i � I",, I,, , /K, ,I,,,-,- fe , /11 / N "Y " /1". 7111A, ( I'- 'I "',", 1� ,,, f , 4,__­1 ` ? � , " 11111--, � ­1 ., I I ,, J, / "I",I, , P " I W ", " \ ` 7 y " . ,I Ni I, I I1111 / I, I If " \ " I I I, --,, / ,,,,, ,,I, 111A I / I ' i , -, , '4e "I "­ ,,, ? I j ,,, - / ,,, , I I li, I'll I , , , I I , "I', / 11� I'll A ­k li - I'll .1--l-l' � I _,`1,,', I �, " ,,, " , ,` / I i \ , II � It "', . ", ,11 I , // / � I I I -,-,-,? ­­ ... - ­11-­ ­­ I'4', ,,, 11 I -,, I , ,�ic (:,l') ii - I I I "N '11, 1 7 C ", f '-, R I / ", / "N"-, 1,4Z, -- , ,� I , , �', I � ... I '\ 1, , - 1� .. .. I I I I f "I", ,I � '�e, ,I, ,/ , " ""'I, ", -.- I / 11111", , 4zl, f 1, I I I ,,­f ,I ,111 I ..... � 1,10 I I � I / I -1. ... ::'_1` 1, ,,,,,, I ",A I \ e,:,;',� 1"'I", � , s p / \ ....... . J I / �, ""', 11, , I ,� I _', ,,,, . .... . .... 111I ,,I. I I,, , 1 ,� f /I I'll i , � '�111' , I \ ,,, ,,,, ", \- "' " ii ""', I -- 1� \ , , , , I I, ,,4_�_ I Ne, / I ... , ,,, I ...... -,, 11- I /f 4" / � "I f/ ", �,� ,,,, I"," / "e, I\ " � � I, % ­­;'­,� ...... .. . -­­ % i"'o , III / J&I-k-, "I'll," 111� V, , ... 'r,", , Nfi, / , T , I, � \ \1, , , '\If , I � /1"', 11 / 11 I i_ , -, _-, / / \ "I � I 11 , I -,-,,,/e,i, "',", ,I ,I / " N, I, e,,,,, I, \ -11") ��, . ...... . ('J"I I , , I ___ I I 'i I '111 -"-- I , , " " "Ill ",\ \ 1,1114, Ifee, � ,- " \ r-11, 11 � � if 1, , i , __­ 1 0) ) ;1-1,1f, i ,11 1 � / be, / 7 If I ", I i .... �) "e"', - I .... 1-1- 111-11 , i i N - , "I'll", "I , --, Of � -pe'll -le. ji, I, l", 1� 11, - le, / r, I 11- I I IN 114 1 11, , , '­�, I, ,�, ',.� " ...... ... . ...... . �, r "' � � ....... 11 I "I I / "' I, I '"" - I \e, III, I / 1, '11"', e J/ IN 1-1111,1111 "4,, " " 11 - 5 -11 - '1­11-1- I I 13 " - V­­. I I " ­`­,/ (_,I) IN l - , I , �,,­ 'e ,, � I - -L-1 -11, " , , 7" ­, I -7 i ,,, - e I "ll I', ,,,,,, � ... - �, , � I , I I I ', I i._ , ,/� / / Nel I ,,, , �,, , " ", "'� ,I', -.11-1111- / / / - f � I __ , 1 IN , '), ,,, """, I / , ,"", �\ , �', 1-11-1 I ­-1-11- I 1_1 I I I I . ..... , P, I i \ . ...... . - I I ... �_'_ " j" I " I " - I I I / I, I> , " "" I ,j __ .1 / ,/ ,j ­­­­_Ii��,, ,�­­,,_ 11- - ,iI,, f // . ........ 1", / "' / e ,, I " " �� __� - ,,, - / ,11 " � 7�, X, � " I e I -1-1 U_ � "I'll, � "I �,, .,4 1, I ,,,, - ," Ik "I I, f I ,, I", I", 11 - -_ 11, ... ... ,,,, " I I I ", � - ,��, ", ,,, � � " I -"----I- I" I/ If "ll -1 IN I J Qz� "', a I- - . . ..... ... 111 I ­111`11� � If I , " 111, ", " ,14, � l, _­�.� , -- if . ........ i / ,,,__­1­: I � , ,,� _­ " � - , � , ...... .............. ... 111,1111 -, , ,� �, "_ /, / "", . ..... 4 � !" ­1 \ , ,,,, I" ,( I 11 11 "", __ - , % I , " , If ", 9 v fle," Q-) �\ ,,, ", / ) 1-11 � I I " i q I " e, / IN , , \' ,I"' I ,­"�,�,,��,, \1111, I "" \1 - -1. L I I 4__ .... . . , �, - I IN / I if �, I .1 , Aft"Ift I / - N / - 11 I 1�', I '11-1- I , "', ` -7 1, - - 10-fte __ ___. -I i I ,." 1, i ? f , e "'c", M I I I , 11 ... 1111­�' ,,, IN -Ii, Q 1 - - F-1 ... 11--,""11111111111 / eN ; .4 I ,_-1, -1 . � IN �` " , I 1, .1 ,I I I , --I- ­ ____ - ___-____ 4 I f I t 11 I " I , 'Ii� / - �,� - __ ,,,, � � I 1- " ", , I _."."l-, , "", - 1-1 �111.11, 111ii,", �y ,,,, 11 "I' I C ,"11,1 \ � -f i - -- _'__I__ "_"­_ " I 'I oi� I f ! / - ... ... - - , I -, ...... I � I "', "" 1 - I / 41 " 11 \ �, ll, 'l 111� I I /� If 1,11 -I-------.. I -)Ii, s , , � " , " " , 11 ,`� ­,­ "I'll 1-1-11-- I'll. `­1 ­__ "I'll ..... _,_.- , I 1,� j , " , I, " , � I '* . .... "" - ­1.11- , , / f e I j, i N ­_ j " ,,, - I 7 l ""c", N, I" IN, "" ", ," i, ""I I, . . .... � - I ", , ... ,­,� , " 1� ,- ___ I ...... "I'll - I'll, I ft-111 I "Ill, ,,,, f I I " I I I I , ? , " 1i , , � , A el ,,,, , ­, I��- - ,, 11 � I - .. . .. 1, I I', 7,11111- " I - I I , I i I / / I " �1, 0 Y /I ", "v \ ek ..... I 1, I - ­11111 � -1-111 ... � )11 ,,,, ­- �� .... __q Ile I IN ," 11 1�1_1 I / "" I� I / , k", , I",4", j I I .. .. 1-11 , " _', , , I / I", � �Zllr I "', "", "JI "" �, I "", I, )el _,"',- , " ""', ff 11 ....... .... . .. / )_� .,". -1-1 I v1111 ... � " � 1111"',, I 'Il , I y " "I" , I, i `,,_� -1" ;i,,", "I'll", ,� 11-1 f I 4­_ - .. .. ..... ,, 1-1,11", 11 , I Ni, ) , , ­IT,­ ... . .. - e, e I I I I'll I " , 1,_ ,,, ',� , 11 ............... I -­ "I' ,\ "' "',,, /N I /I , ""I'll, � I ��11`1:11 I ... ___­__.111'1, / , , /" , \ "'I", ""I" ...... \ "I "I" .... 11, (`_ I - ­ 7 ­­, ", j , 1, ,,.,, � f " , j-x, �,,�,, � I, I" , 2411 1 4 � I f"'1111111--I ­6��- "'if , 1­1 ­11 R I ..... I I " i, ,"', I / ,,, � % If � c I vi%,I% . . .. ..... I, ( ... T, el,,�", "" I l, - / / 11 IN' "I , "" I - ", 1 t k,I,,) I I III f 1 I - "" , ',,,,,, ,_,e /I? / / IN, III, U"I I- j,,, lky ,I ", I 'IN ,,, "", > , "" ... ... , " I - , � I ", i- , � �, If ,I f ,,.,I.) , I I ...... I I I I I . 1 __­11 I I "' ,,, , I "I 11 I , ", """, "I ,11,11- I I I ­'. I I " al 'I, I ',,I """ ,,I ­L',_ "', I , ',I, I I` - I ,_`11�� ... ... : I / I , , , 4� ,4,4, 1 r_.- ?­­­.,_ I ("J", , % , , ... ",-,"I", ,� " - -11 I I I " �, , 'I I _"' "' " " , , �c', "" i ,,, 1, l>,,?�, "I , ", I , , �, "I, , / 11 4I .... ... """ f L1111 "' "' 11 le"' ,,, 1'�",� 1, ",_ I "_, " , ,,, I \ /", >11" 1­111 � � If � ",", � �" ; , X 11 ,I i , " ­__ 1, I , ""', I, I, \ i -, " "" � � 4" uI ,%I I I , 1__ i ­­ I ­­_1 i I I " " i I " ) , t � h, "', , , / fl, I'll I, \ "I", �1` , I." ,_ 'f 'I 'i, I, _­­­ ... ___ """, -111 " \ ,� , " , "', I/ I "", " "I ", "", I ­1 � ,,,, I .... .. 1-1 . ...... t I / I ,? " , I I / ', . . .... . \ / , -) , 4 z. / I If / 1�,, �, "i ,,,,, -1-11- , " N` I'll " INC �e' 1, ,� �111 , ,."', -� � > "', I i / ,�,z � , i, ., �,, , � I - , " " �, I., � �­ . ..... � . .. . . . ..... .. - -I- j I ­111, , , ", " 1, I , - I I 11 ­7 I _111 'i � I �! v IXI� "I I , I 7111, 1 I I I / I Ill ... J \ ,,, -`��' ", " I- �,-­ ,,�� ,,'� I " - / 1111- 11 11 I )e f!"I" "", 17,e ,L ", � f / I "' - I , / . It, i '­_ , ,-_I` ... J_..� __ ... I , , 4 ,,", 1� ', " I ',I - / "t""""""i, - I , I, I / If ,?"" 1--11- " ­1 Co I I ­-4- , " ,,, I , , "' "I"', I ""t , , "" , " � � f,,,, ," I ,[,-,-, , , . __-I, 11 I I I`- � "I , , I I ,,, ,/ ,If, N T ) f / i _'ei', 1...� .... .. " I I llf� I / "" - -- �' - . .... . ­­ i" l,"2,,1',e,­,,,, fe,") I, I " , I .. ... . ...... N, / 'I', ,,, , ", I , I , ­ - 11, , , , " I: ) �' 111� , �­__ I , J ?, , I'll f ,I , I ­111- , 1P _7717 � - I If �/ F 11 'I'll ; I I , , ­', ,� / I � , I I I I I 1 I u,�, - 11--l"', I, , " .... . .. ... . . . . 11 "I ... . 11 I, .__11", 'I I ",`� '11,1111 ,1 �,f,,', , I �,,,� ", ..... 2 'I "", , __ I ... t " , I 11 ,111", ) \ " ,I , I � 1 t�.,a � 1-4- I `-, .... ..... ..... n'. ,,,,/, , / I 1� `�, I "" I'' 71 ,I 1 / 'I I , IN ", I ," K I 'N '1,11""',�,,� I � - ,� p I "i, �',',*,_- " ", 4, ,,, `­,'�� .. . i, , "I", ) N, I 1, " f-l", " "I " � � , , i , I I 1 t 7", 1 ,,,,,, \I I ""' 71.7-11- I, "I ,',� 1-1.1 " I i ""'ife, � 1�, , "',il, I ,,,I IN """', � .... . . l 1� - "'". """"'I'll,"', , "'I\ � I '11�11111 . ... .... -11 I ", 11 I ", 11 -z­';-,,,, r, i", Y_::"'� �­­47',,,Il, 11 1 , I 'r , , , . ..... ­= , - I ,� � ,I 7 , __ � / // N, III,, �,,/ / I f I- ,:,,- I �, I" ,,� "I I --l-l-,", I ,,::� 7� � I f I Ill 11 � I ,,, 1"', - ... 1111111-111, � I , ") I, � / r% , f � / "I \ k � , ',X" I ��,) i , I 1, �f , 'I, .... .. ,,ff, QV ­'� - __,ff _­1 f � I ,� , " � y, ,I "Ill, " I , I % , , � I / � I ",", I I ti �, ,,, I e'do , If ..... X� I / ! 4,',,�, I "'A") R 1, P" , , �_',�� " � ""! /I 1, I �, Q, " ,,, � ,, I I I "I", I'll ""N / " , I :,i � ,, 11 , �",\ I I IL: , ...... .. , , "I , I , " ", " I 11, � 1� 'I "I I ­'­_ i! 1 4 - ... ,,, I " e, "" I I � I I I , 'I / '%1,4 , "I , 11 � "I -, � ,, � 1,1, ", � 11 .. . � """ I ", I ill ") ­­ I - " � � r"I"', I , / I " , , 1-1.1-1-11- .... � ... 4'Ll C, ,,I t , ,,, , I'll I "'Ie, I _­­111� ,", \ / I -�­­__ , - ...... - , /" '�"' -, \�_,,.-� \ el, N", :_2, �, 4 R �,­, I c, I �,,,,,) � Ql) 11, ,_1 11 � 1) f Z, " - � , I I , I / f I I T -/ 11 "' ­i, ,­ I I .4 �, " N, , " I I � I � " � I / '­ I "', ,, , , \e: ­­11-1 """"" I , 11", I I / '�/ "', e " " / � I I. f 11 � I I I I " I �­/__ J! I if I ­-, e, I � `,'� , I I ie .... -l"'.1 ­­­_ "', N" "" ­'� / ,,I,, , --,,,,,, ""I , 11 I 'e, ef, , , " - I f _­_ ... ... 1-1 7 _11.1- , I , , "I " � I I - I I I ,I ,,�,,,/� c.ri' _.:__.___ I , , ,,,,,, -z,, � ,,,,, ,�, , i I ­- I-. 1 -'. - , , /I ""', I I , I I I ", ,( IN l I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 ,'I', ­, , / I P, e 1111:)f ­­', , __:,""',� - , , ... . ..... 11. / , � - I i t / e / "",11"", / , 1� K,, I I, ,,,, I 11 " I I ­,� , I'll, I � I ", 11111-, II, "", "if , I (" ,,­ "," , , ,,, � ,'I,-, 1; , , , I ­­­ , ­111""', j /11 ­', I'll ... ` ",'I , "', , , � "', I , , I "y "I'll ,,,, "< , I "I I ,1 I I ""'), I , I ""': I, ­­­ .... _,"I ", "'I , 11 4'_ " , ir , i I I " )1' / / I � 11, " - I ,,,-,' " "", ,/ � ,,� ---,-"-, __ - I I I I ", - �` I NN , 1 1 1 � I i I / if ��,,, 11 ",4 "I"i ; ...... 1111-11--, I - ...... ,,,, � ,,,, - , ,,'\I k I, " " I I " " ", I ,,, - - - , J "I ,I � I if I t I I -1 " f ,,,I, !�11 -1 . .... . f I ! ,\,� , I I I ,� _,c I " �, , , I ,� e " � / l N, - -I", / , ,I 14 I le f I I I I.I,)) , I, ", I , , I`,", - , - - -, - _1111-1 I I I , ,�) , � ,,, / ,,, " / - . ....... j�,' I , , 'I,- '1�, 7 I, , 1� �' I S 11- 11 , -i- . .... _____ __ - N, .... . _- ______ z" - , , I ?" /7-1-1 -, , _­ IZI I I � "I"I", �,�,_ 11-1 1111- , . I ...... , e, sas I',, �,11111'� ,� % / I / 1 "' - , 11 ..... � I 11 / / � .... z, p-l- 1 f " r111111___ I N 11, �%111. - , ,,,, "", fee, I V-11 �'11, I - __ � i , "I -,�­�_ i , .Z,Z, ,,, / "'I'll" If " If 11"11K) 11 / t! , ,N) I I I 11 -1-1-11 , I If I Ii "' I 11 �­, -1-11:1", I'll, - " " """ , I e , 1, 11-11 � , ; I 1, - NI � � � I, I, � .... .. . 1111_1'11�111'1 'I , "I'll _1_____, ,_______"_ ", ,"', i ­Az, /,!�: ,,,, - - ­­,­ � .. ..... I-, ... . . .. 4, ... � .... Y" e I / ( yi ... �,(._'_, 1 1 (,� _t 't I __ l/ j, I I "' t, I , ,- _�,,-�? " 'l ­­ - .... . .... j--­­­-_ "I r . .. 1,1"I", ___, i I , ­--, --?,_�_ I - ill"' I , ,,______ __ I- I I " " , .... I I q I el-, / / /I I " I 'pe 'e"11"I, f ""I ... . I I / I I, I , ,,�, -­_ .. . ...... - � ­­-, ,I', I 1, � I", , ,,, i I 11.1 I "I", ,�, . .. -7- ...... . . _ ... - "19. "" " , 11.1s I --' % � ,_ - - L__ I I �,"',:�� _--l", 111 r / , "'IF- f N' / "Wo / N , 1 7 � , ­­ I/ ­­1 , 11// �1`11'1 - , __ �, , I ,I I � -1­ I � � 11 !, ""', i I 11 / j Ne , 11 i - \"" I " .1 ­­_ 1_11. 1-1 ,� .. . . i, , I P, ""'k I If I "'411iJ If ,.J,�',, I / " ,/ --­�_4­_ I 1, f , " / I I ?__ - , I , f I I . .. . .... �_: ,"I'-, - I I ,,,,,��) "fI,,, , ! I ,,p� I "I'z" ,I , '1­11111,111 I .. .... :1,111 - "'L 'j, 1 1 1 1p -7'- 1 f, I I, I 1 1 � ".-- , I I I " -1-1.1 __ I'll, 1-111, T � I,", Ne," ,I - I I 11 I I I I I, I I I If 11 I f ", I I / 11 , �` fl, � R", ,'I �,, , 111, � � ­ ", � ,<, "', , , ,,,, � , ,,,,,-,�,, -, fe� _ ,,, 1, 111� _,, �, ", I I, "I , I'll, 11 ,1 ,", " , , , N"", , , I _11 \" " "I �_ , - � %;' 1 , ", � ... ... , I e , " , �11'1' � I ... , , , ty, ,,, ,, , If , �".,h I f"', ,0 / I, ? if , el ,,,I;�., y 11 � . ..... - _��, 1 i I I � \., � 1, I I . / t .... 1, / N N �'e ) I i I I, 7' - i$ j-,", 1 ,I 4 1 ,,"? e ri, J, ( . .. .... -1-1-11 _11 � ..... . . I . . .. .. .... ... I ',,,� , l, 4 ,,, ", - I I �, , , , Q�l .... ... ­,_ � A ­j � ,� - .. ...... � ... ­ I I , I I I ,:,_', I / I - I el e I I", / e 4' / ,,, I I ",4 I , " I I I I "I I I "e' � ,� , \ ": , ) "" ("', I I �, , , '44 , '01 "", ",", 111111-,,� ".4, .. . .... I ­11 'I ""I", ", Nee , ", - I I I " It f I � k " - I­ , , 'i - - -, -1 11 I � 11 . . . ..... � I � , I ...... ...... . I 6 -,,,_,_I,­ ,,,, Aq , ", If / ,"I .... .... I I "' I az� '? ,�,ci � "A ') 11 I,,�� I ,,, .. .......... 11 4 I I ,_�, i / � !"-,, / / / / 1 4 - __,_­`_'_ t � I / I ­1111" .... . .. � .... ", ",­1 ... ­,_,�,', � 1 I i / .. ....... , �,,� I, , " (,:"N � - �, I "I", I"s I", ," I 1, y I __� __ I I I � : I '­) ".1-1 I 1 $4 "I p I , I I ?\�, , , , i 11 ( ­,""It 1, "A" I I _-, , "" I 'I- "", "' 1, /,I / I I t I "'11- !, I -,.1 I 11 I I I, , I I ,-, , ""I I ............ . f f ',',�-, " I 11 ,,,, ,I, ,,, I 11 � 1. � � , -_",Z,-- ­,­j, i � f , ,�_,, ,��, -, I I " I I If I Nel-,"I"", It" ", .. .... � 11 , """', 7"­, / � ,1 N­"',� I I IN, � P1111- I ­`!�,,, I,� I ", , "", I r", . . ....... ... ,"", I I , , I 1""I, -, I ) I � ­­ _­ "' " If 4, " I IN " /­­ ,�,�_ ------- 4�:�� " - . ...... I I . .. . . ....... . ........ ,l,j I I , ,�, ... .... I p 1\1 1, ,," " /­4 ne, � / / . ... . ... ""', I / / _.:� I """" I ;I I " 1 ;, , � I if , I " if I I I Q I I I -, / � " 11-1,"', I � ­`� I I-, 11_,_,_, / I . . ..... ­_-, I ,I- , I , _1___�:1z__1_:_�_L__�-,_: --' I """', � , _______I1,,­/ , , ,,_ Z, - - I , , 111111,1, ,,, l ,,,, ,,, �-,',, " , -, I I � � , ­­111 ... - � - \ " I ,-,II, , / // ',%,.:,� I i, : Ill If , "' � I " I f , I - I -1 '.111, ,,I cr, �, I ( ,� ,,,,� �, , I 11 % ,-, "'I", i IN -, , ,It_'_',: � ),-"-, � , i \ ill )'� ,�;, 1, I ""',, __ f i --i"I" __ � I, , I 'p, � 1 .4 I "I", I - 1-1 , I # I I ­ff, N "" 'I, I ,,,,, ,,,, 11 I I I , "i �'Ie",` " 1, I I I I ,,,,,,,, , I , � I-- "k I -, v I" I i-1-1- "I 11 ­1 Ie ,�,,, I , , I � I �y , / T­ ( � � :ze""'t % , 1"4 je, ) Ile\ j,' III �' I , " , If , If �, I I N � I CIS:') _', ,� ,� � i ,_ 1 �4�� 1, "� I , ""' ,, I ,,,,I 1 ,� I "I I " ( i 1`111I1­-_11',',,_ � I I N , , , ,'I , , I � " ,� ,I "I / ,,, J / ... // I j 1�) �11, , I f I �1, � I I " ", Q) I %, / " "'O" , " I """,,I I " I "I" I I � , "I'l ,,� f � - " I , I , "ll "Ill'-,"I ,zI I _,""', I I '!�, / ,'I I , � , j "Nz I / - 11 , i /�, I " � / c -1 ____ f1l, -4, I I I � I I � , - - ____ e " ",­­_,", , e­q ... ...... - k / _21, __ " - 11 I I I � ,c) , , �, I _.- . � I ","I , ,,,,� I --- 1­'i 4j, ,I I _�, " - I L I ,,,,, � I 11111- "' - I Y 1, - __� ..... . ; .... :� . ....... , -, 11 11 I ­­­ I 1, , - , "I � , � f ____ ...... �1 - , _-.4-1 " If I ,� �, 31,11,111, � L'.",__ - I I- - "', � - 11� ... 11, ,,, / ;1 ef z / I I I I Ll,__ ___ '_ , , ' - il 1) ", f � , 1 "I " f , "", I I ;,,��-, "I""', ,-'Ni � , ' 1 eIj I __1­4 , -,"111, l, I I ---I � _­` " I (Ix",) ei 114 ­", I TNI - �`, 4,;, ,-�'i,,, , - ���N` p" I, � -"- , t ,,, , ": - __ -, j (,:) ,,,,, ,.� - - 11 N I .............. 111111" .. - t_:___",___ � LLLL2 "I 11 / ,,, J f"""","N' , / , I � I 1� . . . . ... ::, -, _', - I ,,11 if j ,,, ­,,�, , � """, I � I - I PROPOSED AREA TO BE ............ � " \I " , IF () I , - "I' ) , f ,:, ,- � , ____ I 1 j, I _X � , � " - - 11 , I t '4100 Ill � -, F III"' _­_-­__ I , 4 , 11 I � I " '­) if t I \ 11 / ( .... I "I'll , .. . I I'll ­11 I /1,--l", � � � ____ el`�, , I f - z") I ii ,I t, ..... . i_ I � 4 � � � � I'll- ­&, is .1 - ,,­1 _ , J 1, "I ­11-1-111111 1i ­2," < ... .... - I I I ­­_j[ , :';,,�� �,,,' --- , I : ! ) 111-11- I ...... . . - , � TRANSFERRED FROM CITY OF � e:,,,,,�­i ' " 1, 1''-II . .... .. 1 , - - (`:"", L f`�� - � ? , el -, -L-r "--,-,--,-,, � , I -) N ­N - � ";- �e t"I'l ,_,�q '6", e'11, "1111fl 11, 1,,,Zll�` � I ," ,1411 I � I ( ", ... A I --i-, f i �\ , , / .1 ,,��,,�',' I I, " - !� 11 I ­ �, t ,,,, , ,I ,,, " 'I"Ie , 1, If ' -y '.1 � , ) l I � (")N, f I f ,� ... �� ",'I, I I , , , �� ,,I I I � I � I , " ! I "'," � , * I ", , ") ("... 111�1 1:__/_,� I Z' -, e-� , , ; I ( - - I CIBOLO TO CITY OF SCHERTZ � I,' 11, ,,,, �c) �Z,;,? _,,;,,,,,�-�' �­ n "I'll, I ", If ,'/ 7/ " ,,, I ( I I ", , \< I,, 11 �, I, I " "I'll c`r) 1!�Z' 1-111 - 111111,lfl�lu,­, I " " "I " Q-, ""'! If I \e\,,,,_ , " I 11 I �j 11 � If ek", 1 I 'I l,,___­­ .... . - - ,- � , , � - - " I " I­ I "'I'll"i 114 / ( ,�, f �'II` 't-t 7 I I t . ... I - � i I I I , , I � � _111, ..... . I - _,"", � "I , I 1 � I � I � I , " -, "I - , _­ I 1_� . . .. _',, ­1­_1_-1___ I 1 , , ,; "', I"N"', � I ,,f / � I """ 111,,", I , , / I , I �, ­`_1111 I ,-.1 I - ___f -- - --- I ""I", " / I, , "") � I'll, 11 �, 4p .41 ,z i `- I ""- � ) I _ " � .10 ... . 4 _________ ­ ___-, ­­_­1 "- - - - ____ .I- ,,, , -_ , I'll- 1.1 _-It-, - 11 ,,� 4 i 5 (:'J" .1� I Q, �, 4 ,­ - " I j - J, , -,--" ,7_::____ .. .. . :_ __111 z""I", I , , , , ­- " " " � , , -N, , I �I -1 - - :-_:"':, , 11 'I, ,,,, I'll, I 1­1 -.1 ` , �, 5", - I �,� ", " -1 " I \ I'll I!_____ ___ - - _-1. ", 11 "I If C) ce, / '11-11, ­,_­­_,_ ­__ - 1-1-1-, I . ....... .. - r- ,­ - " ,", \11 "I I N", / / / / ,if I Al -1 1, .* r "" I Li - \ .... . ..... 1 � 11, f \ "'I", -1 ..... . "I'll, - __ _"1'___ - _­­ -111--" �­­ f, ­­ ­­­ ... .... .. .. ... . .... - ("I"11-1 - I "" ­_ i f._� \ ,-Z""', lil", .* ,I", I "Ill/ I I ,. - ­_,"'] . ......... . ... � 1111-1.1-1- ) I ,,,I ,,c­ o,7 - , ,, , ,_ ";v I "" ""e, "', ,,,,, -, ....... -1-1111--, "., 1 ,_ __ -1- " ___ I __ ­1 I 1, L___ `1: , - - " - " \ 1_1 \ 1-,� I BE � I I No" I j,", I I _711 ... - 1-111"', e 111- t, ,, I " , i I - _-J, __ ,�_,,, "WMIA1111 I. I g III I �` � / / ,,e � f 11-1 I , , ' I I i / ,,,�I, / 1, P__ ­­-, ­111 11-11-11-11-­1 ....... ­­ � ""i, *,Waal I' /ee' I I I I I � I I -:: � / , n PROPOSED AREA To - __ , ­­111, - "I f 1­11 ­­ 1, � ,,,, � ,,, I I ,"�,, � ­� I ,, 11 ",-) ,% ;l 1, / " / Cle,l) I /I 1, - 1111�11111 ... ..... .. 11 , -1,, 111-el 1- - `T­ .. .... T A, I I I I 111A , I i I 11 I EXISTING CITY 4? " rl�`I , 14 �1 I I Ill- � , __-, It, C'­�.�,e TRANSFERRED FROM CITY OF #1 Il ,� �I " I � "'"", , i I 1, I ...... ,4 / I, fee !,::�)� ", ""I I l_r� , l I �; � / , -4, 1 '1141 I I cy, , �, 11 ,',,,I, `y r ) --- "'_', . . ...... . . ... ..... -- ,X_11 � "I", �., , I , I <, �, I , A .... I, � �,`Q INIJ . ... ..... I ,,, l I , " � � I 1"') � , , � " / p 11,_17 7' 1, , , 1� ��, I " - 1, I 1, "I'll r', ,,,I- I I ­_111­_,��� 1, ____, I cell I "" i % "' , ", // /// CIBOLO TO CITY OF SCHERT7 j ; 11,,I'I, I I I � �/ i, """I"", ", 11 I _1 , I i,z) i - e ,.,,, l I ,­e 11­I'_, I LIMITS LINE I � ---- - -,,--,---,) I N ___� I � I � __1 ell Q�1) � I i �,­­___,_ - - f, ""i A, r,I ,I-,,, I Oft f, -­ . .. .. ­4_ L l:�� ..... . _4 ___ I 1114, % _`1111-1 , 1"', -,1_1 � "Ill, � I I - -_ N1 ,c - I C , , f i "Ill"N � I 1 lm"V`Mli�_, W_ ro I " a animmim M MMMMM m Wanown a WMEWN, 19 Mussm a NOWArAn a MEMOIR a MOMWIM go 0 -11 W - , , , i I'- 4:'21 " I I .e 1�1111111mm - I " (."41� "� a IMMEW98 M11 manumis a HIMEffiffils 4% KRUMON a, RM0100 111 01, .... .... ..... � , - , - , - 11 "el, " I - t 'T 1991, I ows a WAMINNMI M WKWAM, M, WAWA= a , ,ftftva , (.,),/ .... (11 .), I � ........... I . . I "t , " n 7 - - -_ , , *I , '14I I I I- e " , " 9 / � C; I ", I -1-1 . . ..... � ...... . __,` .... � ... _r-­­­­4 IIiil . ..... .. ... . .... ", " I , I , ­11 __-M�­0-,vWNpWW, &,� " I_ � __ I I , _..­"­,­_,,', 1 7z *1 '**A�w IN /I W ReAvew ', .. . . . ..... III / - � _.- � � If ""T­ ... - .. .. . .... � / _,",""", 441tv r � .... 1_11 I I X - IM-1, I " ... _", , � I� ",-, , -,) - - _­_.____ - ___ - ____ -- I / " - ,-r-' � , ,_ I ,,, "'I"',_ , � ­, I I _,",_ -1, _l,' ", "',,11- I """', I I I I" I I I " ­ " " ?I " I I, " ,_ I,��",!�,,,,, % """ - - ',� jo,� --Now � I J-1-- ,I I I I ',16 1 11--­ - - __ f ,,,,, I ,,, 1 f I �,,,,, ell?, .I "111 / t "'0111037- WN � 1 ftft"*W ( III/ T11Y",­,N - - / ", , / �- - -T'- I 1.1, � ,"' Nf I j; f "", ", , I I I I -;f': """", ,-' , " ,/ `f, V_ , ci le(I"),"") �llorlgllkfl "400!0 ( ki l I , 1 � t "', "I",",­ � -I - I 6 j I/ "I"," "I'll 11;� e �� 1, ­11 IN " " ­111", v :� V, �,,z) 0 1 J` I " I C�,� I If I ', ... - �41"�,,�?,,,��,�,,,'�",:",�,e""-:���,,,� .. . ... ;j I,,, ,'"AN ft''w1w, 11�,,01 " I "'), I I I'll I`,,,,,,:e � l ,,, 'I i I , I I 11 , .,,1100000'� , I , I - I I "III, 111-11 , I., 11 - L ,- 11 � ,� I I""i � I I "I , 1, I , ""I I ", ,,i "'I""', 'I "'Iftw4w, 111PI"? ( ­"L e f "I 11 I I / 0, ( I 4- c% I I i 142 , I, , -1z ,"! ,,- P., . "I., , ___ L . .... ... _,�, J, I # I N` �� 1"If I PROPOSED AREA TO BE . 4 , 114 I - - "�, ,,quele t - (mc ,,,,,, I (;� �j I �, ,I 1 f 2 � I it J,�,,,INI,�,el,ll,,�j �_ , ",1_­1­.1__. I I I I ,,, I` 11) " 0 , '10-1�'-w-10010111!BAN � " , / 1%ftft*,W4 If I' JI: ­­­111-1--_� ,, I `�' ill " "" , I - ......... �.,�..","�1--ll-,-"".,-,�.-.-. OW I , , ", se", , , r , (" , f, f I /" '� " 1 � I � � - ,it .... . � , I 11 , � /-, "', I, , , j -.0000" I 1\ -M�,,,"10-1 if 1, _',, ,"If,fi, ­ " I-- A, 1, i z 11-1- 11 N? ", , -t .. ..... . . . f,"', "Ill 7 , - /,"I"', y -, ,%** - '\ I 7" , ,,,,/ ,,, ,", ," "" "IftaftrAw, ev'sma ­­­ 1-1, I �' � - "I FROM � _-.1- F I I f" -1 ... I �111 I ',�'­, Ift"M -, � I 111- I` 1-1-11 -1- - I TRANSFERRED I L_ / I, ,� .... ... '00") ,* w-,.- , ", 'I / 11111"I'lle ,p , 1,11i, ,-,, / ,'I �', ') el I \, I I ,-f 1 f , ", "I'll ....... I . � ff" 0 I-I N 11 I ,_` "I - , "I 11", I '� , e', i�� I , ,);�` /'11, I'll, 4 f I '­1111--­ � I I, ,I ''. 1110 e--,* ... . .. � I � 111k \ ,III , -4, "Ill .1 ,"', "'� "I -11, , I "'?4" � I _� ­111111-- .. ... __ - I / /11, I", , ,:";, ,I 111--_,"'.1 - ,I - - II __ V_ / "" I' IN, :, �,_, I _-, / - _J I i I ...... . "I'll r - " iI , / i " I ", C, __ , C/ I f, - I , � 1-11-11-IL.- CITY OF SCHERTZ TO 11 __ it I � ), � � � C, .. .. ... I, I` ,."ei / 'I i -,,, ,,, ,I& N,P,jj� -01-- 11 /f � "I ,1 4 1, I` � � "', "";,"), , )A (", ! le-, - I Wv I /111 I "I - - 11 11 ,I I " I If, "", I ll 0 k 'efli "" k"I"i " � , ,"-,) N ) �? W I 4 1 ". _1111-11", "I - I- I I 0-1, " e,,I�A , ,­� ,* ;-�, "f,:�-,,, i / ""j / I ,'I', l . . .. � .... ) .... I , ,, * ,�, ,/ I I "" I -----I i 7- 11 i I % I III , 'n 3­­` � , i , , , k ,.__ , "i ,( ft*ftW@AW I I— I IN 11 13, - "t", "'a 4 ,I �l , I , - , I � ff - 1�, """, � `f, 11 / .", �­ l ­1 -.1--i � I "',_ . . .... � _,� 4 I, f t � 1, I - 11"." -_ k .. ... . , - -, -_ .......... ­J ,,,,,, �- ) ell ....... 1111`11 ... - 11 CITY OF CIBOLO -1-1-1 / I -- i ", \ -- " I I li ,,,,, , [ I � I ,��, I ,> I I I . . ..... 1 ... .... � ""', ,I' / " , -, I, _', ",I I i i "' - , , I � -- I ,I ,I I -1 11", I - ,I - , I .1 1/1 , ,,, , I ­( .... . . ......... ­'J", ... ,111-11-11-1 � o I 11�1 i , i // �111' 0', " --, % - -- ­,�, '__ I / -IN I I � "I", " """, Nee "j_ - I l, ........ III-, if, 6 \, - ........ I I__­­, '111 v I if 1 ,"", , ,,,,,,, .. .... , 2e,5 f I I - I / "', ,�,,� ...... � . ... Ill, I N I ... � ff"p, , 0 -(_ 11-7 . - ­­­4 I Q," � , , I I i I I 1`,,­� � l , l / ,I I 1 ... . . . 11 e I I I I I .",_1 I I 'I k ,,I� , "" I ,­ �, I "" \," I "Ifl," L . .. ..... _1 I ! I �j r­ ........ - 'I I ,,, ," i f T ­-­ -'-,r­­­ -i . .... ­­­ � "ll 11 - """""' ,I ", I, ___ I . ... . ... r_____ . . ...... . 1111" I i , i I 1, " ,-� - ­­_, "',11,111 ... I'll \ I 1,,,�, , I - I 111-11-I" � I ", it " " e l , � / I I ","'? -11" -- I � ? -111, I ,` 6 ,, ,,,, I I", I � It ,,, I ,I ­11-1111 I-.,, I i .1 I � I I / I 1,51 � 1111! � I " ", ei"", �, 1, yle , , " "", I, f _11--l- ... . .. . - f " � ,f I I , I , "I I I , , , I I � I ,,J I - � -, I I ------- __-j- el I � 1� " I I, '_i�_' I, ,­ ", ,- I I ....... - ,,,,,,,,,! f, k "' �f I I I 11 '­,­,,e` I 11-1-L 1: i ""6� 1 I - ,,, I �, I i� , I I I i ) 'I / .... � ... 111"",", ", """', ,-,I",, \ -11 ..... ,": ," ," ___ "",­ � il I�1-1` 11111-11-1- 11; I 1i "I, 11 ln� ', "I'll, "I'll-1111- I- - ___ ___ ­_,"', - f I "", " i, 1,11 I-",, '11_�' 11.1) I I / , ... .. . r � 1� I I I. ........ 11 1.1-1-1 � fil"�? , '1­11", I'll N 4�,,' f', . -11, 2 " I I I , i ,11 ", I I , 1-1-1-1 I I 1111 I ­.­1 I ', ,i ,,,, ,I, 11 � �,___.___,_,__, I `1­111I_,,__1 jl­ / i / ;, I" ","1111, "I % "',11 jy 'k I I I, I / 1 7 IN � , I ___', . . ..... � � "') / N, I ,? . ....... .. . � I I Ile � ___-) ­­,"', " ) ) I 1 1 I'll 1`1�1`1 I \1 �',"" 11A 11 e I , , I ,,,,, � `16 I -, f __,_i­_­I--_p)f if," I � _. j- ­­-, i I e 1, _,___i,-,_, / "" �, I I I , "" ,I, " I 6 I 1 I I - -1- ,I, / - t , I IN IV' "I'll", i " ­­1 ... ..... 11--', i I , �, !"'e, I I 1) I I i 1'1`�"ill�;f I,`­� -,f;"'f, H I N,- ""' -1--11- -1111, If I , y,""', " f, , , I ""', � 111� - r­­­­__.1.1_' - .... .. �, ,� N I !I '-­�, I I 11 ", � I," / I I '­ ­___ I �"*;?"-"'iefo�,,, `,"'z I � ,I" e �, e3e,,� .. .......... I ""' 11 , "I 1-1, / 1"�', I , ­­4 ___ l I - .. . .. ! '/I _ ,,, - ----- SAKA _4 k, I ) IIIJ I I I III- " ", �-,',,, p L__ ______",­ ------ I-- , I f IN I I If I j � 11 \ ", I5�,_? 1, 1) 3 I p "', / I I I ( N/ i , � , / "'11-11-If . ....... . 5 /I __ lr_,:'�_ ... ..... . _'_ ) 0,0011\ feel \ I" �, \ I , , I 1 13 / 'f 11 ,s,,�3 ,,,,, f , - , I ) '­­__,j__,_/ " - I , I I / 11 `� \ :1 \ I . .. i ,I , , t,­__ I I 0� 111:��, � I , < i , _ ----,--,,,-,i � -I --, ,,"I'i i��,,, ,,,, I -` I, F �, If l? t� __I_ / I , 'I �I,I , il & , �, ­_ I I I _111171 ,, i I i � -_ i/ ,I 1114, �,�,­- I \ ,,, / I / I I I I ,,,, ji \ 'y \ , I \1­111 10 T-11111","_ "! ,":'- �­ 11111-111, , f �,-',';;�,,,,_, t---,_,,, ;1 _,", � I I �`.'y ,I "Ill 5 i , " \ I 1 '12 r-­­­-1 ""I'," , � 1 4 ,�' I f \ I -�ll,�-111�-11�i"�"--.,-�l,--,,.""-":", ,,, , """ I'll 1_� _­,", `� , _' ____- i , , _4111-d I-1,11111 - 1­1 I ,,, I / /I,,-. I " , f Y \ - I ""'111, \',I ­_­_ i I- "") 4 1 p ..... .. 1ff1,W,z,',`2'� "I � i "'e", 7 I "r-, . ....... � "I N I �1_11 � , \ , \ � ,_ I -­­ "�'�I�b I , 'I'll � _­­,"_ 11 i ) I "'Ill III, 'I � '­,­­-" I f - " lzzl:�'1,4111, ""I � 'I I , I 1,_', " 1-11, , , , ­­- � f - I ... 4 Q­ 1-1--f I 111-­11111- I I ,,, I If " I I I l � .... I 1, ;, 'O 11 I 1 �,, 1) ,,,,,,,,,, I11111­" � ? ",\ "I'll" j I I, - I I Ile / / '), ""'111-111- " I I'l, I ,N� ,, ­­­, I` 11 "I" I "I-1 1 ,1 ,11,1' , `-, , , � I I i"1111-111-11 .... . . - �, ,�,, / , I ��, ,,, ,'I� ..... .. 1? I, 11 "l ""',_-, I �',', t . ...... _­111-11-, ! ,� ""' , , ""i"tz" Ie,f I I I \ I __ �, N -""--"--,, __ %I" ,N? 11 /,"', 1 It 1 / C'el-, D CITY %, � ", 'I"," \ , " I "') f 1; I 1'') "'I ez" ') I "" / ' �, / I I I ,�� _11 � ------- --- , ,I,, ", , I " Ii. I / I I -11 , 'A , "", , I " -,, 1 " (_ I , � / 6' / ;, if j / /I I ""j, ,,, " f i I / 0 7 j "" � ,,, I ... ... ..... " ,, i e, ,,,, I . .. ,,�z,,' clo) ,,,, "I , ), , , / �, "', III,, , ,�,-,, ,,, P � , 'y 7 1 ","­I i I -, " ,/ � \ I , � ,I, ,_, , 5 , lli'111!4� � I " - /,"111111111- I ! 'i­ I � " I" '11"',-, - -_ __j , f � [_-, ,_`,,�,�" � ,,� _ e, "', N, / LIMITS LINE , ell \,, ,,::',""',",,,, ,,, "I", il 11) ---___I1 , I,, " I -_ i I- I /I I ! r, , C 111-11 I, 11 "",1 \ I e"I,11 / 26 / , -i 1-.111 I I I � , I -11,11,11, .......... - I I 0Z, I"I" I ,,I, " / I,',' � ,-,---I- - i ,�,­­­_ � , I I 131 � --y . ..... ­. I ? - " 1, ;, I � �, 'e I'll I "-"- 11", '­­'�_ f " I 1117-1 y ( " I � I I I ` I �,,,`,,,Il ",<, ,,,,,, - "'11111111"", , - I- - " , � � /I-,-,- , 71 i I I / i If' I - \ , ,�,' \ 'I"', IN, IN "", , 11 11, / , """ , � , , "', ,", " "' tfi,,,-"",,-,,, ?, - 1­3 ,,/ 1�, .111" I "I , � ­'i ......... � ... ... , ­ L I I , ­1 � 11,11, 'el", 4N, ", " " "I" a "'i I " "', - - I ", , ,� � 139 1 , , 27 1 I 11- . ... I'll, ___ N, 11 " I 1. t '11, ,-.1, I ')- - -.1- P" "'' , I 1� "// , " _,-,__1_',_ I ,I I ,_,'5,0,`lI fI � ­I """ - " I I lil? l(�') "Ill, , I'A' \ ""I 4 / 11-11 ,,,, , ,,, I I jr," "I - ­11, It ", � I. - 11 - ...... .. . IK- f I b I 1 ,-N -""",',fg,��""-,', I/ " 11 \ \ ,,,,, %1 i ___11 "', I - -­ �1 1--,", _ 11, ",", """," I lo, \ ,, ­­­_,�,I, , ," 11 1:? I/ y ,�,,,, \ I y", \,", - " ,,, � 7;', i I ,",,I,- ',,�,, j I " I! ) """'k I __ 11, I ji �""�'i%,,,, I 1 ,,, ," ... i("""", 1-1 'IN I, , l le"AII, , z" �, ) __,�� " ­­11111- "',11 I ,,,,,, 11 % 4 F­ -e, ,,I.% N` 1 ,2,�-,'," �t - "", I ?" ...... ­­11­1 - - I, " <l I I ,, I�l � ,�f'I"I f "" , I I I I , -, T­ ... __­ _., I 'N' I'll I I / " - I \ 11 ,I I I I I ""e I 4 " I,,,e,,* "wif," I--/ ""I.,- I I \ I r"?, 'r \ ) & '� """""' � ... . . ... . , � 'ec' �,"3� 1 ,,, - ", I ... 1, I I _____ I I , I 4­­1­­­, 1 N7,P) -,,I / I, �, � 111-4 ... ­­­ I , ,,,�, -,,,,I I., ,I, 11", � ...... . I � I ,,e: ("I 'e"I i I p � "I , 1 1 """" ,,,,,. ""%,\ Cr 11 L .... (") _,, I ; - 1--__ ­­,", � i "" I I ­111111-111 <��, ,­1 I 11 ,,, ,., � I N \ i""""i, C", I - / I , I ""l I "'?,5, I :�ll ,> I - �?, I , lir ,le ""I ­­,; i , . " __'_,,_j I, 1, � r - " I ;,:,�,I,,,,z, ""g,I "i", , "? if 11 ,.� " I I i e / 11" I �� , 11 I I , ... � , , "" 11e, ,�, - "" " ;' ("I \ , , ,-1 11 ,� � I ,,, ,,,, I �11 I ,I, I , ,", I'� 1-11,111 F I "N'l I ,,," 11, , ,,,, I / / �,,,,, -1 ""I I I-, .. .. -I, - '__ L I , " 11 ? ,( ,,, p � ­­'l , "I N \ / , , ­_ ­11111.1--_ l, I I I ,� I ,,, ,, , ( ,,� ....... - , ­­­__ I I , ,, o' 1, ,,,,I, / \ C_� � i k ,,,, T" "I - I / 11-1111--l' ­1 ,IN­e` ;�� lff, \ I,` / "" ,_', 'i"', , I - / " -11,11-11,11, ! -I i - I f 1 71111.1 . .. I/ III I - I� A, �":', / --,----- I ��Fy­­­­ ........ . . � ... ... I ) "I'�"I"I':: ,,"',", , I / - , " ii Q1111 ""', I\ / "'I", / , "I',", - , L ..... ..... - I _5 , -11-1 ele \ ,,,, f I 'il ,­`\ .1 , I:�,, ""z,� 1", ,_, \ , "I � I - e�,,, !,ei ,j "c"", // I/ """", T, 11 I I - I, 11 "i, ( \ / / < ,,,I', /I 11 le, I , � 'f- I I j / I, ,,, I " , 1, Nil, N` , I � f,,:",f K,�,�, ,� 4, I ,,,, �* L__," "' 15 \ ", -g,r It, -----, -- ---- � - - ­1 j ,,, I " I'5" I " - I -,',:',? I H ..... I . I . ) e'J'ii "11, " 1, '' i", "I" -, - ',1 It - I -I,,,- ", �, 7,;1 I lil", i&l i, \ ,,, �` , I "', ,,, , ,I � ,'I, I I-, __ ,� I , / Ill, N' 11-, , / � IN -'e,", 11 ­­ ,�"",�� ," - , If I "', ,�� I N­ I/ ? ___ ,if " 11, I ,,, 'I 11 _,", , 11111.1111.,"-, I I/ t I " it "i ..... - -, " , , , _ " , 1­1 9 "", lif"', IN 1, r,,'111"�,", / If �P, I/ '11"I", / ,,,I .... ........ %�' I � 11,=1 I ­-, - - �,-��,��",-�,�"-,-""�"."�l- I 1 f C) / I # , I " k I --� i j I �-,,,,,` \)��";"�,',',",�/,"',��,",""',', , �) , " , I I �� " NI�� Nii / -, z %, � I` � �_j I 1, I 1, , ? " ,,�I I el, ��Ke "ll", I �,f ", 'l, " I Il I '. "" �, \ 1, "", ,"'11 l'i", e N, �% �, ", /' 11 ll ". I I'll ,I ­­-4, __ i -.1-1- ", ; 15' "'I", I \ , " - , ,I " I - " \ � 1-11,1111"',_ I I I,e­- I,.) _ , t I \ el ," �, "fe" It \ ,,,/ ", p"'J ,", I ,-,,' fg , 11 ,� \ 11 , i \"-If I'liIj, I\, I ( , - , -, I " ,,, t 117/1 ,�, I 1, � ,,, ,,I �111, fe' I 1 , ", I"' " If � " , " I I / 11 I "", " ", I,,, , ,,, ", " - _­ / 1 �,�I'll,�l",��"""��"""""?,�I'l""I'll,�,,�$1,�l-,:,"";";"� 1, I l,,," �­11, le, ,,�, , I , ,,'�, " I � I I I - f - I �, 11 " , If I ,�,\,? ,�,,', ,,� __ 1-i "" 'll "', f ", 8 / � � � , ,ji,,""; ,',`,�? , I \"', " / Is , , <' , , I / "I , �7 1 ,I � _.__ "'. \ "., � \ ,,, f, I\ Irt� � I , I " I --jf I "-, �111�_1_1` , "I ,,, I `,",' 11-1i I I - __-, -, _`_'�­ _- -'I' 1 2, I I " "', " I Nee � I5,T"', ,,,,, /­­' ", "I'll I I ;,-, --J, ,�,j , ,,,, I", I 'I / I "I" ,%,­�',el' , , , ,,, " , " / I \ "',"', , r, , �� I I I 11, " i�,, � .... ,, � - i J ...... _,,,` <' 16 I­­­­%""` N, e lool, "I II" ,�,,� 4 \ I "I, I ,,,,Il,�? I ', " I 1-11--_ - . ......... ii, ,4e"",�,�ll",��,'�,,,,�:,���,, ,/' /I j 1�.11� Il"', ,l , ­� i zy \ ,� .... . ___j I I I , I ,,,,,,""I , I )""I"Ne", ,I I < III 11 I�I, `4 ,""," "Ie, % � � ?­­­__ -I,,--- ".- ,�,,; `-­­­­'I .17 � I3 ce"i I ,,,, i, "I " , ", I - - I ,< , - H - � \'� Ill " ,`­ 11 ,III (15 I 1 "! "! , 11 I , I I .1""'I'l-," _,,", " " 'I'll", I/ 11 I " ,,,I, 11111-1111-11-11 If ...... . I ... , I "I", , � �, �ie, f� ,,­, ­­I I 7 / I , , / IN - \ I - __ -1-, , � ", � - --� - �11 I "'1161 � ,:" ';"lI­--­, . ..... . `1 " , I \ I., 1%, I �, \ -I,,,­­ ............. \ ee.""'l') I, �-­­L_ -, ____ - eU I ,,��,,, , i I ,,'�)(,;, "I ,� e , ,,__::�� , ,:-": !'�',, � ? 11 ,I I"',"" '1�l(',,�""�e, ,NI 11 11 IN "_ , ,I,__,_\_-­ -I-11-1-1 I "i i \ 111, � 1� - ?�,, I, � I t"1111-1- I I 1, Z'11 ­,", I >1 "I i I I, .� � ­­__ ..... .. _1 I , " "'I""", "., � , , ,,,,, �� ,� , " I 1­­ - "I" "I I C" "I ""I"",, , 11"� ""I \ """"" ", ­_ 1, I", l Ili I _­-, I 11 11 I�,! 'f, I / II >f, 1,1' � I - , __1 ,�,,,,, \, \_1111, - 1, - ', 41 t / , , ,,I, , 11, _.", I /1 ,__ . .. ..... ... � 9 ___1 "'I"', 9 91' I, 4 Ill", 7�, J* , , ,I ­v,_- / ), � ,� '_ "i 11 1, " 11 f "'t? ... , ,� )"111111-11111 / " If , % "" t 'e, , �111­1­ "', I 'A , " ,,,I,,f I � 1 ,,,� - If' / \ N , I , I f , � � / "", I / ...... , ,,,�_;px!i,`Q','�',",, ',�"" ,"', � -�� j el \ -, """ I �11.1111,_ I I Ill I ... I, " \­1 I " " ", t I � I ,-,, I I I _­-­,1­1 ­111-1-1, " I " " 11 " 1\ Ife I 1 8 � ,,&, I, I,� -k�I��' IN j ... ... C, , I ,1 . .... I .. _ I� f­iI "' �, " � / "", ,,, I'll, 11 , 1,`� " "" , - I"' ___ 11 "I 1 s .. .. � � 1111fe1z" I , � ,,Ie�, - \ "" "" , Il"? I "", 1_,N ,,, "., ,-,,,�,,�,,",""�,"".,""",�""I` i _,", , � 2 �,, Ii -11,11,11, ----,,I ", , ,,',,,,,I 11 "Ne", 1 rll* I i I If ,,, ��,�': , i", I I , �,'. " ) J.- - ,-, / ", ", " -, """, , If if i � , I 1, I IN` I �", ,,I / ,,, " V ', /, ,,, ", , , I e,�,1411' f - � I t "' / I If -,,, " , ,,, IN, __-, 11 ­_'1111111 QI iI, """, - - , , ii) \,1­1111 ... ,,, i I ­_­_­1­________1 i " , �,, , � , ___ ... - , � I I'll h ) 36 ? / I ""', ,,,, I" I ,� I ,,.,,� J, i ", /, / 111­­,,�, 'el" '111 ", ,,,, .�, // "" I ,,,, 11,,, o " � 11 `,',� ill-11-1 --I'- I �"e I :,""',-, , If I , I "I'__ ...... ____4 I/11"i'le, I ,,, "" ", "I'll, 1, "I", .. .... ;, I ,,, / / � Y, ""I � I fl­­ -11,11-1� - r I I,,_, ? ?" \ fill .............. , I i, :�i �',,: , c I �I ,,, /'I:,Xc)";� __­7 " f I IQ', , , "i ,,, --- 4 , -.11-11111--,", - ,,, I ("I 1i ' 1) I ____ I i 17`7`7�,I- p I \ 1 " I ,I ,,,,, - ,� "_ , j" Ne I-I"' I / "'I 44 1""' - f ----, ­­_-, I ", ''I" I I I rI � , ", �� Ile,* ­", ii ... Ill .... I '?, I ,,,, 1, I ... ._j I " , 11", // , , , " ,,I",,,"" f() -,-� -11, ... ""-f I I , i"11-11 "", " I - If '__,__ _­` _�e` ", " \ I ,," / "'I ,,, " N " ­)' "i IN 'Jej 'I ,,, I f_11__11__1___1__, ___,_____ I i 1) f "l, 1 "if �15, , �11 11 / I l"I'll"I., I / " ,I, 22 'Z', I ,,3, , " ',' f1111111-11-1 \ /1, , I /111 ( _/ � ", ,", _,",-, ", I "Ill',"," - ____,_ �',::i -_ " '4"z, I � , ,,,,,, - � -,"'If",.111 " I � , "" 'Nl, I "", :�� . ... . . � i,�3',;' 1-1 ­­ , 1 7 f, ""' "" / / 1, ) "', IN / \ 'N N' I ... el""I` �� 1, ,", � " ''Ill',.",", , � ill, ,�-�'ll"��,4 I I I, I / 11 40' / " , %�,,,,, " ,,;,� ... I 111<' , 1, I ___', 1 2 i__ 11-11111,1111-11- I �,- __e , N- . . ............ . � I . ,,, `11, 1, / ,,, " , f"I "", III IN, � Ili I 11111 I, f -.1 "l-,"11"I", , - '' I �� , 11C, "",) " " �,,Ie, I - I � - I 1� I "I I I,, I ?,I / , , "' , , _,��,, ;�, 29 1 1."', I i 11-11 ------ __-J, 11, , 11- ".1,111- I I "?, � - ", \ 5 1 ,,,�Iq , I -, I,-, ___ ,'N'4 " - " _J I f',��,�I'fe / I "', i ­__j I I/ "N' " 1""j / / 71, - , / " �,,,�!, 'I'le", N, , �,) 4,3 ,," ,,,- , ... .. . �:-,,,e,,��,,,- I ") ,,, 1151, 1 1 , 8 ,/,I �, ".5 f"I"'I"', "',�,' \ 1, I Nee, 11_'1-_'�"N? , ,," ,,,, ,,,,, " 4 ,,, I ,,� . ... . . . ) �,,�,'),,,N� "', I, \�', I 'I I I ,� - .I I- / __ 4,1e? ,""", ,,, " , _�e` ,� Ily ", il I ___ e - - I ,1� _,_;"1____1 I 1, ,,�� i �,,�', ! ... ...... I ,f 'I , ', i, y / "'Iff " I I " i ,I __'_,"_. 1 1 ­­­­ ­­­ ....... ..... - 41 :, 1�'�,' , l , / " "/'III ,"_,,.� , ", ....... . � / ,,,, , I .. .......... _"�_ /' - I I, "r,"I�,"i- -_ III �, , /I xl`e� .... .... ,, i /I ", ,", ') I "" _--i ____ I , , ,,, I p � I IN ,,, 1 -�,I! \ / �7 / I " ii3n ", I < N"', -, I 1-11 " t -1 I � I I ! I e 11 � � / 11-1 I v­­___ , , " ­", � I ef " I . p " �,,� ,I, 1, I IN � �l­ N I " ", I ""',�,"";, I ; , 1 , __ .......... � I / fee / N, Ne", " I,< ey, , , 'j - � I ,-,?',',--i,, 11 I ,"'I I,, I \ I f "I \ ,,,, " �"', ""I"'N" , , 14" 1 -, ­_,__­111­,­ I I I t _--ji 6 i 1, / `­__11',__',,, I "i, "I,"-", \11 ­e ,?f�� f __ , ""- --t ­­ _/ I ,I, I, ,L ,'I,/ ," ji e-11-11-11111- ? I "I I I, - " el I", 0`1-- � 'N' � - .... _,","", �,, " I, ,I' 11, / (11 I,' IN /,3 -I, \ t�l " 1 11 - , I, ,-1,41 I I "",\ ,,, - I ..... . / i/ ,I " N, "',"""', l ", ,,� I '-1-1-1 , :''�­,_ ... .. .... ... .. ......... 11-11-1 I 11 ­111-1 I I I 'I, - `4 , 11 I,�,,'e , ,,, , ", e I I I \ P11"'11-1-1-1-11-1-1-11 f 7 ___1 , I _____.____,__1 I .... ... "I'll., " I " ;-: 1\ , ,'­3 1 "Il f- __, - ­__-, I f I - I I ,` , 11 ­11_11�.', It , I III / "I 'i f 'e I7, `% ,4o' 1 f --_j � - 1, I """e�"Z " r . . ......... � .... � .... I If ,4q, 1 ,,? 1 I � � ,1 ) I >1 4 I \ C 11 Ili I I I ­ 1, " _, I I 11 / ,I/' / 11, " / ,,<' ", \,�,, , "', "", ,,,,, � , , , i I 1­_ " � I 1111- I I ----_, I- 'I",'�, � /I ,I "/ i'l, " �� N I ... .... I "', " U I "I" � 2I,,�', 1 , - I I I 1­j _­_t�__..4 132 1 i1111__1_11______ _j r11 � 1, `11\1, 11-11 .... . .. �", I _,�,,, IN, ,I ,,,,<' " ,, .. ..... .. _­')­­,­­ . ..... . 1p � "1111,111-- .... . ... - ­� ...... -, ") I I _,­,­�",____111,� I'll I , 1, II �,,, ? 1, I " ii "1111-11111-", " , "" \I I �, -�, . .. ..... I _'-'- �,N I / I I 7 I-11., . ........ ....... . ... _j/ ri `,,""', "' "' I�,n ", N�� \ I I11,11 I , I- p I I I 1 \ / --"-"-"-,, i � __­_'­l le 16 \"', /N' ) ,I I � ,,,,,,,, ,,, � I I 1) I ,�7, / I ,<ff"I ,�� tI) " i, "--,-I _ , - I i , ? p ""Ill ,I- I- 141-11--l-1- o' I I \ ,e ,I k I i lee III, " Ii i �Iel_ll ""11,1"'5 1 11 "-, -_ , " -, I I "Nf "i I e \ " / � / ", ,I 11, ! N, ,,,, p I, __ ""I I N, " "ll \ ,,, -,� - - I I 1� \ /I " 1, -, __­`I.1,11_,, 4 I " �11, '15 " , , "17, , /­­­ 'c-,".1 I H � l 111--, " / / ? 9 / / N &-I" , """', :�n,00' ____ - , , , e - ------,- __j I ­,,_`,,,,r I -I ... I I � /' 40I, I I l "i, I I 1,_­ - - I Y f ,--" I' I 11, I ­1 1i � I / If I, %, IN ell .", ..... I I ) fe I "I -11'_`­� ? i ""I, _j 1, 36 I 1 4 ,')� ,,,)­-­, " ,,,I, / IN ,11 "", ilI f (,J 11-10 ___-, � ­­11-11- ... I ��,� 1 7 t ,"", \ i 1 ,,,,,__,,e / / / I ,I ,,< I'll, i """-,I,-,- I !` -_______, , _­ - - --"-,-,, - , " """ - ,,, , "' " ", "' , ,-, , I " , i - I ,,-,I , I ­ "I'll I � i, l ` 11 7 1 __I - - � 'os . . . . - 410. I 2", M ",-, -"", I 't-ti ,\= ", � Ar_jh1kL I IL-1-111 771�1 I T-111 I d / I` *� / , 77 YI 7,,% " ,; %�.A I � � 1 I � N ,,, I ,,, I I _11-1.1 " I ? ___j , 0,'�? I I I If -"- iA�f`,�' � ", 1, , I 1351 .......... . I-- 1 ,3(':,', ,, _, _-, "--_,, ­11-111-111,11-111, / / ',',,"") l � � �_._I,1,111 I Or"? ....... ... 11 'i III, I N11 fee, e" ,,, 1< Nil, N % 1i ,,.* "1117 1 .. . I. .. � .. ..... . � . ...... .... . . _____I,) �1_1_1111.1__ V y`_1111__ ", _ l ,I I ,` I'll", ,�,00, _ I / ... - I "_, I ""I", � / / / " 11_1fI;I9 f _ " 1_1 i - . ... I 1'_I�,,-"­'1 \1 k I ,,111.`11", � f i I iI 1; ! 1, (1,11 1�111 // e/ 'j-, \ I " )1� _­ I 1�111',' "" 111 ", "" 11 11-1-1-1111-- - I" I " - ­111- I " - I I ___`­ ­­ �I, if "IN ... el 11 ,� �,_ ,,,�,,,,I 11 , ,,,,, , , 1111-111 _11-1111"\ -1- , ", "Ifiq f 111-1.11- 1, I -11-111-1 -""- - I I ", 11 -1 - \ I � �,� , ­­_ ,I 11 _1 I if " "I', - 11 "I ", 1�11` "I y,`-? --.-- I I - - ! ......... .... ... � . ... � .... .. ­111-141, 1 , " , � 1',,_,,I_,_"_,­­ " " � ........ �_ .. . ___ ___ I II ­1111111-11 � ,,�,'I) It I-__ -, I I , I I "III i �, 0',` I ) ?"11111, - I - I _ ,�!,i I ""I , ', \ 'I'll", �� ? / � 11 '-f ,,)5 -"'--"-,-""-"""��;,�-�,,�"I'll""II If- -, ­_, 1� ,""E'l \ �ce` i . .. ... .. .. . . .... ) I �' / / / IN, " (", 1'3, X ,.", ,_,� I � 1 j, 8 I, i, - -1 - _- - I 1 � 11 � �,, NA / "', , " /NN',,'�e, �",) I , ) ""; , '_ � I "'.11-1111, I ,,,;,',,� , I I , I - , I i ..... * ...... " "" " � "", / - _____ I I ", jj I -'I- - _ , " , ,7 )�,, ��,,,� . ..... ... f,� - 31I, 1 1 -Do \ I ,/ / I I I / 5>1, '11-l"I . .. ... �','� I ,,, ­­ I - I I " 37 f ------ _4 / le P , 4­,,,f t -, 1, - I IN I\ Ile Ill 1, " .1 ,e "" I , -1-11-111 I � I' / ii ) - - , - . .... .. . . ..... ...... � I", - \ " , "-' /` / 2;r 1 [ --, , 1-- , " 1511 �,,',, / ­;"� "If, I-I . ..... el ", 8 � "',,' 'i � . .. . ... � I I 111,,, ,` " -,, , i I I ,- I ,"',e) 1 I, .. . .... . ..... - ,,,, `�, ""',­,"",�,,� -,� �7111'1 k 9 I -�, _17 __ '7111-1 ! I I ,`� �'_/ � , ,,, I __ I .... .. � "" f I , " '1\ / -1- I ", , , __ - ­-, " fe `� �,"? \ ,,,,, \ I ,,I "', - ,,N' , �e,, '11-1-11 -1 , Ji , , ,,I,,,, ,,, , -le 1 / , "' \11 ��'- , � I I I, % '� "I I , , #p , # I I - ... . �r . .... . ��, 1,11,11 \ - _\Ill _-, 11 \ , L .... . . . � ... ­­" " ,I ��""­11 - - I 1 ,"', I I I - I , "" .111111I­ _,� = ­,--l" T-111-11-1-1- - .", ___r111_ I'll , `�,­! I t, 1 1 - _', - / l'i-,"""", "" -, ei­ \ \ I.. I !, " '> , . 11 I -, L__ - / , I i�?\,-,�,�)"\���,�---,\�'-,---� `�_�_ 5,9 '111;1`1 / , /", - - ,/ I I � 11-1 I 1 I ,,, - I / ",Ill '111 '.1-I-11" ... I, , i " I 11,,� ,� " I ------ �_ i I /I "I I ,�, , , , " LEGEND mmmmmmm W, offiffiffiffimm, EXISTING CITY LIMITS LINE � 0 � PROPOSED CITY LIMITS LINE ____ PROP. ROW -1 - - - - - - - I-,-- PROP. UNIT LINE i : I ; PROP. AREA TO BE i I 4 i TRANSFERRED TO CITY OF i : � ­­ 1-11 _1111­ __ I ­ I � -1- I IJ SCHERTZ - PROP. AREA TO BE �= TRANSFERRED TO CITY OF CIBOLO ETJ HOMESTEAD CITY LIMIT TRANSFER EXHIBIT 0 200' 6666WENNIn SCALE: 1 " = 200' MALONE*WHEELER SINCE INC 1995 CIVIL ENGINEERING * DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING * PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5113 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 260 Austin, Texas 78735 Phone: (512) 899-0601 Fax: (512) 899-0655 Firm Registration No. F-786 Agenda No. 16 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: October 24, 2017 Department: Engineering Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -D -45 Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance providing that the Code of Ordinances of the City of Schertz, Texas be amended by revising Chapter 86, Section 86 -115, Maximum limits generally on specific streets, adding the maximum speed limits of IH 35 Access Road to a construction speed limit, changing the maximum speed limit. (First & Final Reading). An ordinance for a construction speed limit was requested by TxDOT and presented to City Council on September 26, 2017. TxDOT requested a 40mph construction speed zone for the construction area of the FM 1103 bridge (See Exhibit). The approved CCM and Ordinance, 17- D-38, were relayed to TxDOT staff and it was determined that their original request of 40 mph was incorrect. The appropriate speed limit was to be 45 mph. City staff asked TxDOT if the construction zone speed limit could remain at 40mph. TxDOT's staff informed Engineering that the speed study performed showed the safe speed limit for this construction area is 45mph. As a result, City staff is recommending approval of a new ordinance setting the construction zone speed limit at 45mph. Construction speed zones will be in effect when speed reduction signs are displayed within the TxDOT construction project identified as NH 2017(797). The maximum construction speed limits in this construction zone of the IH35 access road will be included in the City's Code of Ordinances Sec. 86- 1.1.5. The completion of the project shall cancel the provision of the ordinance applying to the project and any remaining construction speed zone signs shall be removed. Goal To ensure that safe speed limits are established and enforceable through the City's Code of Ordinances. Community Benefit To provide for safe and efficient travel on streets within the City for citizens and visitors. Summary of Recommended Action Approval is recommended to allow for placement of the construction speed limit signs by TxDOT. FISCAL IMPACT City Council Memorandum Page 2 No cost to the city, these signs will be installed and maintained by the TxDOT contractor. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -D -45 on the first and final reading and declaring an emergency. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance 17 -D -45 Exhibit — IH 35 Frontage Road Construction Speed Zone (45mph) AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS PROVIDING THAT THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, BE AMENDED BY REVISING SECTION 86 -115, MAXIMUM LIMITS GENERALLY ON SPECIFIC STREETS; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY WHEREAS, it has been established that the maximum speed limits need to be included for IH 35 frontage roads in the Code of Ordinances where a construction speed zone is in effect when signs are displayed within Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) construction project NH 2017(797). BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1 THAT, Section 86- 1.1.5- Maximum limits on specific streets of the Code of Ordinances be amended with the addition as follows: IH 35 frontage roads from MP 1.441 which is IH35 Frontage Roads approximately 580' southwest of FM 1103, 45 northeasterly to MP 1.668 which is approximately 618' northeast of FM1103, for a distance of 0.227 miles approximately. Section 2 The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3 All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4 This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5 If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6 It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7 This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8 The completion of TxDOT Project NH 2017(797) shall cancel the provision of this ordinance applying to said project. PASSED ON FIRST AND FINAL READING, the 24th day of October 2017. . Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) MP 1.441 M RBF;CU ELEVEN w , Is a N Pr v= oposed Maximum Speed Limit: c c W C c cwc s oc X R 2X X X COMMUNITY SCH11FIR TL OPPORTUNITY TY Date: 10/12/2017 To: City of Schertz City Council Information Item: CCAB Boards and Commissions Summary As discussed at the October 10, 2017 meeting, the attached summary is provided to boards and commissions each month in an effort to increase their understanding of issues being considered. 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 schertz.cor i September 20, 2017 reports from boards and commissions (Last CCAB meeting August 16, 2017) BOA Board of Adjustments has not met since the last CCAB meeting. Planning and Zoning Commission — August 23, 2017 meeting cancelled and September 13, 2017 At their September 13 meeting the Commission approved a number of plats and replats. They also discussed a number of amendments to the Unified Development Code relating to vesting, boards and commissions, community facility agreements, and notice requirements (zoning signs). TSAC —September 7, 2017 TSAC discussed cars parking along Savannah across from Paschal Elementary School. At an earlier meeting a resident had complained that the cars posed a hazard and conflicted with the bike lane. Staff evaluated the situation and recommended that nothing be done at this time. The parking generally only occurs a limited number of times per year when Paschal has an event, the bike lanes will be evaluated as part of the MPO hike and bike trail grant implementation and road improvements, such as striping a deceleration (right turn lane) at Chapel Hill were not appropriate. Staff will continue to monitor the situation to determine if signage is needed to help discourage parking too close to the intersections. Staff also updated the Commission on the Clemens parking situation and discussed having the police department work with the school district to determine if any adjustments to crossing guard times at some locations is needed. Historic Preservation The SHPC has not met since the last CCAB meeting. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board has not meet since the last CCAB meeting. Library Board —September 11, 2017 The library Board received an update on the City's efforts to prevent students from parking in the library parking lot. It was generally agreed that the efforts to date; police officers in parking lots at key times, additional signage, message from the school to students and crossing guards at lighted crosswalks has helped quite a bit. Concerns were expressed about parents speeding through the parking lot in the afternoon when they were picking up kids who walked over from Clemens. Schertz Economic Development Corporation At the August 24th regular SEDC Board meeting an incentive agreement was approved for Ace Mart Restaurant Supply Company's (Ace Mart) warehouse and distribution operations. Ace Mart provides foodservice and equipment supplies throughout Texas for the restaurant industry. As part of the incentive agreement, Ace Mart will lease the 214,000 square foot facility located at 9850 Doerr Lane, create over $20 million in new taxable property, generate $720,000 in new sales taxes, and create at least 40 full -time jobs in Schertz. In return, Ace Mart will receive a grant for $225,000 plus annual grants worth a portion of personal property taxes paid to the City of Schertz. The SEDC Board approved the incentive agreement because Ace Mart helps create primary jobs. Primary jobs refer to those industries that produce goods and services that are exported outside the region. The creation of primary jobs help infuse new money and demand into the local economy helping to create a market for restaurants, retail and other industries that primarily serve our local community. Committee of Committee Advisory Board Meeting Summary September 19, 2017 Board, Committee, Commission Report /Updates CCAB was provided the summary document that contained the most recent updates /information for each board /commission /committee. CCAB members touched on the highlights from their respective board /commission /committee. City Manager Report City Manager, John Kessel, provided an overview of the status of some key projects, including Fire Station #2, Fire Station #3, Senior Center, Schertz Parkway, Lower Seguin low water crossing, the PCI Seal Coat Projects (Curtis and a portion of Live Oak), and the Budget approval. Recycling Study Executive Director Dudley Wait provided a summary of the UIW Report on recycling and discussed how we may be able to work with Republic going forward. Key points included the once per week pickup vs. twice per week pickup, the city growing to be twice our current size, the higher cost of solid waste vs. recycling ($35 per ton for solid waste vs. $12 per ton for recycling), and how we might transition to a higher diversion rate in order to save rate costs to our citizens. Ultimately we may see a program similar to San Antonio but we are only at the very first steps of the process to understand the best way forward. Procurement Philosophy Discussion Purchasing and HR Director Jessica Kurz provided an overview of the draft Procurement Philosophy. She covered the key concepts of Economy, Effectiveness, and Efficiency, as well as Expertise, Workload Timing, Workload Volume, Scalability, and Mandates. She concluded with information on contract administration and the need for auditing and review for meeting original goals. LTE 90 V tT NE1 I IN: 1: L 0 1: 1 t fflfj Z I I Date: 10/24/2017 im City of Schertz City Council Information Item: Promotion of VFW Events in the City of Schertz Answer to Councilmember Thompson's request on helping to promote VFW events going on in the City. FOMPTTIMIM Sarah Gonzalez Assistant to the City Manager City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.61 9. 1000 A sch z,rc,�rn LTE 90 V tT NE1 �.�s. 1 t Request for Promotion of VFW Events in the City of Schertz: During the Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items be placed on a future City Council agenda section at the October 10th City Council meeting, Councilmember Thompson stated that he recently attended two events in the city: 1) The MIA/POW event put on by the VFW and 2) An event put on by the Knights of Columbus. He mentioned the event put on by the Knights of Columbus was well attended, while the MIA /POW event was sparsely attended. Councilman Thompson requested that the City coordinate some communication with the VFW to see if we can utilize the public relations aspect of the City to promote upcoming events they may have. Currently, staff receives many requests throughout the year, from many different organizations, for help in promoting their events. It is currently staff's practice to assist in promoting these events. The VFW did not reach out to the City for help in promoting the recent MIA/POW event. Staff has an established relationship with the VFW district and local commanders and works closely to not only promote but also help put on their larger events, such as the Memorial Day ceremony or the upcoming Veterans Day ceremony. For the Veterans Day ceremony, staff is working with the VFW and The Chamber's Military Affairs Committee to help plan and offer our assistance where needed. We are promoting the event in the November issue of Schertz Magazine and the Parks and Facility Services departments are scheduled to get the Veterans Plaza ready for the ceremony.