Loading...
06-25-2018 BOA Agenda with associated documentsSCHERTZ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 City_ of Schertz Core Values Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you would want to be treated Work together cooperatively as a team 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED 3. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes for the May 21, 2018 Regular Meeting. 0 a$] 1110 toa,I1\.7101 The Board ofAdjustment will hold a public hearing related to variance requests within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, and the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant's request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Board will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Board will act on the applicant's request. A. BOA2018 -002 A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3788 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. B. BOA2018 -003 A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3761 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Board of Adjustment June 25, 2018 Page 1 of 2 C. BOA2018 -004 A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3717 Columbia Drive, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. D. BOA2018 -005 A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. 5. ANNOUNCEMENTS: A. Announcements by Members City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended B. Announcements by City Staff City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • April 18, 2018 & May 16, 2018 Committee of Committee Advisory Board Meeting Summaries 6. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING CERTIFICATION I, Emily Grobe, Planner of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 22nd day of June, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code. E , C,va Emily Grobe, Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Board of Adjustment was removed from the official bulletin board on day of , 2018. title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619 -1030 at least 24 hours in advance of'meeting. The Board of Adjustment for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. Board of Adjustment June 25, 2018 Page 2 of 2 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES May 21, 2018 The Schertz Board of Adjustment convened on May 21, 2018 at 6:00 P.M. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Richard Dziewit, Chairman David Reynolds, Vice Chairman Earl Hartzog Frank McElroy Danielene Salas BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT Reginna Agee 1. 2. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Mr. Dziewit called the regular SEAT ALTERNATE TO Danielene Salas was 3. CONSENT AGENT Minutes for the Sent an CITY STAFF Bryce Cox, Senior Planner Channary Gould, Planner I Scott McClelland, Project Manager James Herrera, Resi Ernest Marshall, Re to order at 6:00 P.M. and ieated as an alte A: mber 25, 2017 Re to present. who was absent. Mr. McElroy seconded the motion. The vote was 4. PUBLIC HEARING: BOA2018 -001 Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a variance to Unified Development Code Article 5, Section 21.5.7.B Dimensional Requirements, Non - Residential Zoning Districts, in order to permit structures that exceed 35 feet in height in the Public Use zoning district, located at 12191 Ray Corbett Drive, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. Mrs. Gould gave a presentation to the Board, indicating that the requested height variance is to allow for an elevated water storage tank that is proposed to be a maximum height of 225 feet. She explained that Article 5 Section 21.5.7.B lists the maximum allowed height for the Public Use District at 35 feet. She indicated that the requested maximum height of 225 feet for the proposed water tank height is required in order for the tank to function as intended to provide water service to customers in the southern Schertz region. She described the site location for where the water tank is proposed. Mrs. Gould indicated that a public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express on April 25, 2018 and that on April 27, 2018, a total of eight (8) notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners. At the time of the staff report, two inquiries were received, however Minutes Board of Adjustment. May 21, 2018 . Page 1 of 4 no written responses were received indicating objection or support for the project. Mrs. Gould presented the draft site plan for the project and summarized elements proposed with the site plan that is currently being processed by the City. She indicated that the requested height variance complies with the approval criteria for granting a variance. Staff recommended approval of BOA 2018 -001. Mr. McClelland introduced himself and explained to the Board pressure zones in the City and discussed tank elevations for existing tanks and the proposed tank site. He mentioned that the pressure ranges need to be approximately the same. He also provided a little history regarding how the City selected the project site and coordinated with Randolph Air Force Base to ultimately wind up with the current proposed site. Mr. McClelland indicated that the City is confident that FAA will be supportive of the proposed tank and location. Mr. Dziewit opened the public hearing at 6:14 P.M. Mr. James Hererra, 12020 Schaefer Road, the subject site. He indicated that he lives property. He mentioned that he was not c aesthetics of the water tower having an water tower location should be reversed a for the water tower. Mr. Ernest Marshall, 12198 Scha mentioned that the City did not r hoping that the tank would be mov livestock on his property and wo would be replaced with the proiect. toned that he owns Shady Oaks Ranch, right next to and also hosts corporate picnics and weddings at his ed by Engineering and expressed concern about the on his property value. He also suggested that the licated that he disagrees with the proposed location entioned+ that he resides next to Mr. Hererra. He im and that he heard from his neighbor. He was ryfrom his property line. He also commented about fencing around the tank. He wondered his fence Mr. Dziewit closed the public hearing at 6:49 P.M. Mr. McClelland responded to some of the comments made. He mentioned that there will be an 8- foot tall fencecrete masonry wall along one of the property lines and around other areas of the project site. He also pointed out areas that will include chain link fencing. Mr. McClelland explained that the proposed location of the tower is so that it will be as far away from Ray Corbett Drive as possible. He also ,explained that this new water tower will make the water system more reliable for residents in southern Schertz. He discussed distances of the tower location from adjacent properties, including Mr. Hererra's and Mr. Marshall's properties. Mr. Hartzog asked about the proposed elevation compared to the height of the tower off Live Oak. Mr. McClelland explained the topography of the sites and the site selection process and explained that the proposed site is at a lower elevation, so the height of the water tower being proposed is higher than the tower off Live Oak. Mr. Clelland also mentioned how it is best to locate the water source as close to customers as possible. Ms. Salas asked about whether there were other proposed sites for the water tower and wondered why this specific location was selected. What are the other proposed sites and what are the impacts to the surrounding properties of those other sites? Mr. McClelland explained the site selection process and how the site is in the no conflict zone. He mentioned a memo that the City received from Randolph in 2017. Minutes Board of Adjustment May 21, 2018 . Page 2 of 4 4 6. Ms. Salas wanted to know what other options are. Mr. Brian James explained that the challenge that the City has is we have a system for water service that is spread throughout the community to service the public. A series of elevated and ground storage tanks is part of the water system for the City and that it cannot be all from a centralized source. He gave a summary about the site selection process and explained that if we changed the location to a different location, then another resident would complain. He indicated that the City has not typically done condemnation where we can help it. Ms. Salas said she has not heard that there were other options available and is still wondering if other options were looked at. Mr. James indicated that the City looked at a series of other sites throughout southern Schertz, but the other sites were eliminated due to conflict with flight paths of Randolph. He said that the City worked closely with Randolph, who indicated that we would not have an issue obtaining FAA's approval. Mr. James confirmed that the City looked at a series of sites with property owners willing to sell and the City tries to look for willing sellers to avoid condemnation. Mr. Dziewit commented about engaging t outcome for the adjacent property owners sewer lift station, nobody wants that near staff is not going to try to minimize the in person, you move it closer to another res really changes the impact it has. Mr. Dziewit indicated that the B is correct and made a motion to would have to consider it for a di Mr. Hartzog Motion carri A. Announcements by Mr. Hartzog mentioned vendors and food trucks. Cox mentioned that staff meeting or meeting after. B. Announcements by lic and how it may have resulted in a more positive James responded indicating using the example of a And fundamentally with an elevated storage tank, of an elevated tank. If you move it away from one He is not sure if changing the location of the tank oking at height, not location. Mr. Hartzog confirmed that the request. He indicated that if they disapprove it, they Reynolds seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0. ling the Main Street event and said it was interesting, with a lot of said it was fun. Mr. Dziewit asked about continuing education. Mr. working with the City Attorney on training for the Board for next Mr. Cox mentioned the packets included CCAB summaries and said staff will email out summaries in the future. He also mentioned the upcoming Council on the Go meeting. Mr. Hartzog expressed that he likes information being emailed out to the Board. He also mentioned the roadway impact fees that were adopted by City Council. He also asked about the "What's Developing in Schertz" feature on the City's website. Bryce walked the Board through how to access the interactive GIS map that shows all projects under construction. ADJOURNMENT Minutes Board of Adjustment May 21, 2018 . Page 3 of 4 The meeting adjourned at 6:59 P.M. Chairman, Board of Adjustment Recording Secretary, City of Schertz Minutes Board of Adjustment May 21, 2018 . Page 4 of 4 TO: Board of Adjustment PREPARED BY: Emily Grobe, Planner PRESENTED BY: John Perry, Fire Marshal CASE: BOA 2018 -002 — 3788 Pebble Beach- Accessory Structures- Location SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3788 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner I Applicant: Henry & Debra Martinez REQUEST: The property owner is requesting a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures in order to permit an accessory structure, shed, to be located closer than three feet from the adjacent property line and closer than ten feet from the main residential structure located on the property. PUBLIC NOTICE: The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express News" on June 6, 2018. There were twenty -seven (27) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on June 7, 2018. At the time of this staff report three (3) responses (including 1 response outside the 200' buffer) in favor and six (6) responses (including 1 response outside the 200' buffer) opposed and one (1) response neutral to the request have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owners have installed a six foot (6') wide by ten foot (10') long shed immediately adjacent to their residential home. Per UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, accessory structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and shall be located no closer than ten feet (10') from the main building. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet, there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications. UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is in place due to life safety concerns in terms of accessory structures proximity to property lines and main structures. Specifically, this requirement is in place to protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City. Separation distances allow for increased operational ability and safety of first responders as well as surrounding residents. The separation distance requirements within the UDC are not only to protect the property owner of the main structure and accessory structure but also the adjacent property owners. In addition to the life safety concerns the separation distance requirements are also in place for aesthetic purposes very similar to front yard setbacks. Typical residential lot setbacks provide for a more open, inviting atmosphere for a neighborhood, and also reduce the feeling of looming buildings and compactness. The separation distance for accessory buildings to the main structure is for very similar reasons, to encourage that sense of space and openness for both the adjacent neighbor and the community as a whole. Although staff recognizes the aesthetics of the separation distance between the residential home and the shed, staff does not feel that not having the separation significantly negatively impacts the adjacent properties. SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is located approximately 350 feet north of the intersection of Columbia Drive and Pebble Beach, specifically at 3788 Pebble Beach. Existing Zoning Existing Use Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential Existing Zoning Existing Use North Single- Family Residential (R -6) Access Path to Golf Course South Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential East Right -of -Way Pebble Beach West Pre- Develoament Golf Course CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.0 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.20 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a six foot (6) wide by ten foot (10) long shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed immediately adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features do not exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; No special conditions of restricted area, topography, or physical features exist on the property to staff's knowledge, that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land that are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district. The City's accessory structure location requirements apply to all zoning designations within the City of Schertz. This variance is a request due to the subject property, and the subdivision HOA restrictions per the applicant's variance justifications. The subject property is immediately adjacent to the Northcliffe Golf Club and within the HOA restrictions for the Fairways of Scenic Hills, per the information provided to City staff by the applicant, there are stipulations that state that accessory structures, including sheds, cannot be located within the rear yard, which would be seen from the golf course. HOA restrictions are not City imposed or enforced and only apply to property within the HOA. The City does not have any requirements which would prohibit the safe placement of the shed in the backyard. 3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or The hardship is the result of the applicants own actions. The property owners received approval through the Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association- Architectural Control Committee, which indicated that the location was not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association, however the UDC separation requirement is still enforced. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications 4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. STAFF ANALYSIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of BOA 2018 -002. The request for a variance does comply with the approval criteria for granting a variance as presented above. Planning Department Recommendation Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* X I Denial * While the Board can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. Attachments: Public hearing notice map Additional Exhibits Provided by Applicant Public hearing notice responses 3 I--," 4 > m CD 0 U3 > m m M Zi X UO 0 03 03 m PEBBLE BEACH (75325) IH 35 N (75381) IPA -4 qj ^mow l6ti 0 380 PEBBLE. Ac OA --I 00 > m "0 61 NnW co co, w 319 99 EP Aq,- NO RCN 389. 3ap0 IPA -4 - S3-.5v 1 kAO 0 380 PEBBLE. Ac OA --I (10833 "0 61 cot co, w >< ley, COO\ COO 0 00 6 C0 \,pe ,j O\ 6 Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory building and non-conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following criteria. State how your request meets these conditions. Description of variance request: 21.8.2 C, D Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of right commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? 1Z yes 13 No Ex . plain: There are numerous sheds that viiolate the UDC intent within the same zoning distdat Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? ff Yes No Explain: Because the properties in question are located on the Northcliffe Golf Course, we are prohibited from placing the shed in what would be a compliant location in this area. 3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant's own actions or intended for financial interest? IN Yes 0 No Exolain: We put the shed up following HOA protocol and per the assurance of Tuff Shed,that we were in removing the sheds. 4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity? 13 Yes 9 No 1110 1 16-Variance Checklist Upd.md 10-2W Page 2 oft 0, r" .'F 4 lU'tE +ESId'i • 3. -., N 40`37'06 "W 53.5 aprA1 .. _'"^w• -�.'b erg.. ..�..e.ea+at»„ � •� .+I, i` LO7 20 T i 5' M0. SMACK s' ecn seMAvt s 3r.s COV. to fit" �• �. BW -41J- �, C it1F2Y r CRICK �* Si NO ' �# w —4 � RE S. 37138 x i ' °� � 1 20' strtc. sErpne�t +`• ,i ccv. i dJr7 iT;Y' ESAf7 K g' CfiNL p 1 M PAD r r T . $ 'A. PEBBLE 6�404 �. a + jj � a iyy 3t}' pne .. 501 ft,(}. Fit r ' L'IT N0. i .QCK�I M —p—At-ft. Na ttNS1au �TdaE F.v�w * scNArts- - say. of �r±z uef�a aw 2r umt r {sa — y Pt, : PIXNT fNTSrtSeCTSIt C Tp0xt9s'� . ec a WM i;s r T eAT+ r * ,efiTY` -- 00UNTYa tEW4+^ ,.r 4GNtRWT,UNp 6ipltXdti ' h F o.r. NO.,�..,,m,w.,••,,,..n KG t TCtFi frftCE• cat s STATE 0i` T X S 1 COUNTY OF ORKAR $ t 1 N6Y TNAt`iTTE A ®OV£ i4AY..iS,rntlE iTY L ' WARS01 Atfi AN Afi AM RIPt NTATION • 11, TN£ PROPEAVY AMMO TO Atf ABTUAI, . V" ' L •Trt SubJFT pit �#TY 4.S NRr'eiVA"100 '41Y6C1� 'Yt7P;E `A° MA4£ 0.`i TF. ORa,RRS itNt7ER YY SUi+RR ANW t 74C NO *W TNT, I' WATC brAP. K:6UkASiM • CH r Aqq 10t 1 AN TYT( Aft@ N0 Minx UN - t%SQTEFA.MCfE'S,.• C TB,. PROiRt}toNs" rks W4T}4e TS WF.s&irf: NTflW j. R \'ETifAApCt M°{TIIrE ,SY THX 8 . G# Y T AYtY..'$a�.5.:9Ft R�WSiT- fYeAY. 2 Wrkwr .AWE OAS Wu rNc eltzon iW PLAT. ®`�jjy g'• � nits t Y oK �„�' Mr*i€� 'tea aa, 1 - } • . -1 .1 pRaaMAN IS jE4r TO AC59T110TTY£a _ :��6 °'� •�• I( ` c:WV&NANTO—RC + sit rwaft oM i x tQ cNrc 0. M.}uPDATtt 00NSIXTR10 7GWIM . fAW S a _ ! 9 rose Tk4.8Ft ura•rR. Yasei J•If +t =TSr ffta ratea�a -- — a " . i This fax w s received by GFf Wmakeriax server. for More information, visit: http :/ ofl.00m Sales rr`P - � � G Trim Paint: C Accent UVERMAD VIEW AP Location: OrlpNent Color: Customer Name: a Options (List), ' Customer or responsible individual will baat site at time ofdelivemY hao�ocbmnand|*v�?0�mu�n�uno�m�n�,*��uh«�wwmmAp��o�/' � -^'~`'^--`~''--''''-'~--^'^-'^^~'^^^`-'Y�� 0D --- |othena18"dea�noeanoundaU4�doanfthe~°id/nQ7_,,`^.,.mmme'moo*rmmm/�w�/-^^'~-'`^,-'~Y�| 0�--- kathenaok�r access to�m oKo?,'^.,,,.~_~,_,~,.`' ~^-^^~^`~~~-`~~~^'-'~'--^'—`-~`~''y�� 0O--- kmth«na�11O~mu���/UN��m�ar- �OOy.,.~, ~~~'`^^^~-~'~'^~~`^^~''~``--~^^^^'^—YES 0D--- outlet within -- ' ^''`^'~ Y�� 00 Customer understands permits, h��o@nduUnabd�dmnntofmh�r�ad�eaoeo�ouo�nn�erb ~,~'' --- _ . naaponm|��|VXY Y�� 0O [;ustommrhas been p�oenbadthe "VVhathVExpmnt document? -------''~~ ^^''`' --- Ou�omeruMderm�ndathatchongee'oanoe||adonmDrpo�poue~°''--^^'^^~~'^~--^~^-^~^^'~^^~^`^^-�� N0---� "='.=^.^"`"��p,��mmnsaomgun will result 1n restocking/rescheduling fee? ........... ............................................................ kath�mNO FLOOR option? ^'.,_._,,^~~,_._`,,,,`...................... '^-`-'-'^^`-^~'-^~^'^^..yED N0____ ~. Y�� 0u Does the p�nto�mu�teUh�boVd/ng?._...,__..^ ..-~ -^~~~'^^`'-~^~^^` --- Ho»vo�seto the bUUd�be caDwepadkou/vmNc�?._~.,..,',.,^-^''~^`~^~'--~''^'---~~��� WQ--- Special Instructions: .......... ..-.~^_-.-..-..°~-...^-~ 17319 San Pedro, Suite 318 San Antonio TX, 78232 Phone: (210) 494-0659 Fax: (210) 494-0887 January 2, 2018 Henry &Debra Martinez, III 378O Pebble Beach Cibolo, TX 78108 Dear Henry O' Debra Martinez, III: On behalf of the Architectural Control Committee for Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association, Inc., we would like to congratulate you on the approval to install a shed at 3788 Pebble Beach! Thank you for taking the time bz properly document your improvement and seek approval. |t is good neighbors like you that keep your community looking great! Please be advised that your submitted request has been approved with the following conditions: 1. All design plans submitted within your approved request .must befollowed; 2. Any future maintenance of the improvement will be at the expense of the homeowner; 3. The improvement/installation and/or construction shall not affect drainage or water flow pn this lot or neighboring lots; 4. Homeowner is responsible for obtaining any/all applicable citv/countypermMs. Approval does not constitute the improvement being safe or sound; only that the improvement, as requested, is not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association. Thank you for submitting your plans to the Architectural Control Committee, and congratulations on your new home improvement project! Dana Fenner ACC Coordinator dfenner@spectromam.com Fire Retardant Intumescent Paint D E:1 When exposed to high heat, inturnescent paints begin a chemical reaction, swelling and expanding to many times its original size, creating a thick layer "Wa- � "'"* #lw- "N M - M M one gallon and five gallon containers. Not rated for use on structural steel or spray polyurethane foam insulation RDR Technologies Oktahoma City, OK 405-702-0055 TECHNOLOGIES General Descr!PVOW Contego PFB is a full-bodied latex. sinele cornQo2ent Loatiag ................ M, M ­Z.L.0 �W ICILC, U1 ITI s emical signature is identical to our HS (High Solids) version and can be used interchangeably. Technical Data: Color White Specific Gravity 1.26 pH Range 8.0-8.5 Weight/Gal 10.5 lbs (4.9 Kgs)* Hazardous Ingredients N/A Volume Solids 52.0% (+/- 2%) Weight Solids 515% (4-/- 2%) Viscosity 110 Kreb Units (+/- 10%) Flammability Not Flammable VOC. (LESS WATER) .01 GRAMS /LITRE (Nil) 'Does not include weight of packaging. contractor can apply it. Product Advantages: * Exceptional protection from heat and fire. * Smooth, thin, architectural grade finish. * Top coat with whatever you prefer alkyds, acrylics or lacquer. *Nontoxic, nondermatic and noncarcinogenic latex. * Can be pre-applied to steel and other material during fabrication and is easy to repair. * May be sprayed, brushed or rotted. No special equipment is required. Any qualffled contractor can apply it. * Interior or exterior application (use an exterior grade top coot, fear exterior applications). * Economically priced. * Fast drying and curing times. * Cleans tip with soap and water. *Ala shelf life limitations and does not need to be periodically reapplied, Intumescent CONTINUED Required Coating Thickness: Current recommendations are a maximum wet film thickness of 20 mils (.50mm), drying to 10 mils (.25mm). Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. The big advantage is impressive savings in application and labor costs and time. Forstructural steel applications, referto our calculator to determine required thickness forvarious substrates, densities and required ratings. Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. General Guidelines for Coating Thickness Requirements: All applications are enhanced by 2594. to 32% when top coated with a finish coat of your preference. Test results were based an comparative performance with a top coat of oil-based alkyd. Precautions: * Do not mix, thin or dilute the Contego product with anything else. * Do not allow the product to freeze. If frozen, the texture will be obviously different. Discard it. * Do not store in temperatures above 105'F (30'C) for extended periods of time. * Do not expose the product to rain, snow, dew or extreme humidity until top coated. warranty: Contego products are warranted for ten years from date of application against material defects. Proof of purchase (store receipt and bar code from can) is required for warranty claims. Claims are limited to replacement of product only, The Testing: Contego product are tested to a variety of standards such as UL, ULc, ASTM, NFPA, UBC, CEN, ISO, and others by the best Research Institute (SwRI), Omega Point, Guardian Laboratories, SGS/USTesting, KTA, Materials Analytical Services, MAGI and more. All labs are certified, accredited and audited. Test results are available online at www.contegointernational.com or can be obtained on DVD by contacting our customer services department or your local representative. Distributed by RDR Technologies, ILLC $35 SE 30th St, Suite C Oklahoma City, OK 73129 4OS-306-3062 Cantego International, Inc. (USA) PC Box 684 Westfield, IN 460 74 Leon - thanks for calling today. I'm attaching spec sheet for BanFire paint (Class A), and also Contego (time rated). I think Class A is all you should need. You will need to topcoat the f ire retardant paint with any standard exterior-grade latex. The BanFlre paint comes in white, tan, grey and black, so the tan would be closest to what you have now. Just let me know if you need anything else. Doug Stafford RDR Technologies 405-306-3062 c 405-702-0055 o cJ _k, Internet #100321591 Store SKU #419109 Sha Save to Favorites Print re Sheetrock Fig ode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. Gypsum Board a Fire-resistant gypsum board e For interior applications 0 Score and snap easily $9.981 each If you buy 48 or more $8w48/ each 8,i()4 mm A 'A Installation Options Product Overview a Intended for fire-rated applications h P I i -, r c � z 'a, r, S i � a e t i � 0 C F i 1 5 t x S p �s k i r o c 14 2 11 G 113 0 8 1 0 3 2 1 `,3n 51/94!18, 8�od PM Specifications ---------- Product Height (in.) OM5 Product Length (ft.) m Product Width (ft.) 0 Product Width (M.) 48 VVidth (ft) x Length (ft) 4 x 8 ? "a p,T -"w ,"n iSi?i,, ["St Ock- e-- C,, e- 5 - E', - in -x --� -f I, x -8 -£t -GV � sum 421 '110 11308 "10 032 1591 ',2 41 i p xupa.0mw�xaswumwouanVr�xu��m+necomu-coe'so-m��'�/+x�_/�qvpsmn-aoau-m�nonaooD000?/em �o�nu.u:o4nw Paomum4 Horne Model # 14211011309 Internet #202329713 Store SW #161148 S Share Save to Favorites Print Sheetrock F ecode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 9 ft. Gypsum Board $1500 leach '0 , - �, ..,.`:r; C., ry W Installation ''Options Product Overview Heavy, natural-finish face paper for durability and a clean look a 518 in. tapered edges provide smoother joints * Type X core offers greater fire resistance than regular panels * Easily scores and snaps to save tirne S M -41 ard --142 11011 -.,C,,9:zA23,2`9 /13 ;1 /2 t8 a 2 f- of * How much do YOU need? Let our calculator help: Info & GLAdes 0 Specificaflon You will need Adose @ AcrobatO Reader to view PDF documents, Downioad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Specifications '11 U2 Product VVidtih ('IQ m Drywall Features Fire Resistant ProdUCt Weight (lb.) 13 -1 rd - 14 1 0, 13 09 2 22, 9 P o t V,h , '' ��, r, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy MR, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy a Tapered edges for easily con ceale ddint s, a Light weight speeds installation, * For intedor applications * Use in new, or repair and remodel constnuction How much do you need? Let our calculater help: Info & GiAdes You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to neutral to 0 the request for: BOA2018-002 Comments: Name: � AMNV fir` BHA!ft:-4c-dP-VyA S I A/ - , (Please Print Your Name) Signature 00 Street Address: golf 0 Date Zvo-bF) 1400 Schertz Parkway s Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 schartz.corn ------------------------------------- — — ---- — Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to K neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-002 Comments: Name' 1 f J 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 r 210.619,1000 . schertz.corn Reply Form )II t-- I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to OIP neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA 018 -002 Comments: w, Name: Ot4-/L/15 (Please Print Your Name) Signature Street Address: 327,5- Date , ✓ /3 —lq 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 _ ScImiz,com Reply Form 1 am: in favor of opposed tor-El neutral to 0 tFie request for: BOA201 8-0 02 Comments: Name: (Please Print Your Name) Signature Street Address: Date 1400 Schertz Parkway s Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 . * schedz.com Ar-1 COMMUNITY SERVICE 1 a �TZ I OPPORTUNITY � 11 OLTA 011113 90191911 M June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council ' Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and act upon the following item- BOA2018-002 — A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.0. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3788 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas Because you own property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel., please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: egrobe@schertz.com If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. Name: (Please Print Your Name) Street Address: Date 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 . * schertz.corn COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHEIRTZ I OPPORTUNITY DEVELOPMENT June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment, will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Scherfz, Texas to consider and act upon the following item: BOA2018-002 — A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.0. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3788 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas Because you own property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: egrobe@schertz.com If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. Sincerely, ho *t Emily Grobe Planner I Reply Form I am: in favor ❑ opposed to ❑ neutral to Ll4e"request for: BOA2018-002 Comments: 01 (Please Print Your Nam- e) Signature Street Address: Date 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 . * schadmCorn I --W FleArIN"ApIff ltr� n, DEVELOPMENT The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6-00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Coun0i Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and act upon the following item: ME= 000mam I am: in favor of X ovoosed to 0 neutral to 0 the request for: BOA2018-003 Comments- yi2 r ,Name: t Le -D yq (Please Print Your Name) Date 4�,, p 1400 Schertz Parkvvay Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 Emily Grobe Subject: RE: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills From: Steve and Teresa Date: 6/20/18 09:57 (GMT-06:00) To: marshals Subject: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills Jackie, (Marshals), At issue in our community (HOA) is the number of outbuildings (sheds) that have been installed, all of which are not in compliance with city code. That is to say they are not at least 10 feet away from the main structure (house), and/or not within the proper distance away from common property lines. Some of the homeowners have already received letters from the city, but they have disregarded the notice(s). Further and after the fact, some of the homeowners believe they can apply for a city variance which will allow them to keep their existing, non-compliant sheds. We don't want the city to be duped, and we don't want these non-compliant sheds to remain in our community. These sheds pose a fire and safety risk to our neighbors and community. We understand there is a city meeting This coming Monday to address variances regarding outbuildings (sheds). We want to ensure you are aware of what is going on in our community and to deny any requests for variances that will jeopardize the safety of the homes in our area, and around the city. Here is a list of some of the homes that clearly have non-compliant outbuildings (sheds): 6041 Covers Cove 3799 Pebble Beach 3788 Pebble Beach 3761 Pebble Beach 3692 Pebble Beach 3683 Pebble Beach 3675 Pebble Beach 3669 Pebble Beach 3672 Pebble Beach 3678 Pebble Beach 5709 Tuckatoe 3 717 Columbia Drive We would like to know what action the city is and/or will be taken to rectify this problem. Thank you, Steve and Teresa Smart TO: Board of Adjustment PREPARED BY: Emily Grobe, Planner PRESENTED BY: John Perry, Fire Marshal CASE: BOA 2018 -003 — 3761 Pebble Beach- Accessory Structures- Location SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3761 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. REQUEST: The property owner is requesting a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures in order to permit an accessory structure, shed, to be located closer than three feet from the adjacent property line and closer than ten feet from the main residential structure located on the property. PUBLIC NOTICE: The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express News" on June 6, 2018. There were nineteen (19) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on June 7, 2018. At the time of this staff report six (6) responses in favor and two (2) responses (including 1 response outside the 200' buffer) opposed and zero (0) responses neutral to the request have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owner have installed a ten foot (10') wide by twelve foot (12) long shed adjacent to their residential home. Per UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, accessory structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and shall be located no closer than ten feet (10') from the main building. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet, there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications. UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is in place due to life safety concerns in terms of accessory structures proximity to property lines and main structures. Specifically, this requirement is in place to protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City. Separation distances allow for increased operational ability and safety of first responders as well as surrounding residents. The separation distance requirements within the UDC are not only to protect the property owner of the main structure and accessory structure but also the adjacent property owners. In addition to the life safety concerns the separation distance requirements are also in place for aesthetic purposes very similar to front yard setbacks. Typical residential lot setbacks provide for a more open, inviting atmosphere for a neighborhood, and also reduce the feeling of looming buildings and compactness. The separation distance for accessory buildings to the main structure is for very similar reasons, to encourage that sense of space and openness for both the adjacent neighbor and the community as a whole. Although staff recognizes the aesthetics of the separation distance between the residential home and the shed, staff does not feel that not having the separation significantly negatively impacts the adjacent properties. SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is located approximately 800 feet north west of the intersection of Columbia Drive and Pebble Beach, specifically at 3761 Pebble Beach. Existing Zoning Existing Use Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.0 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.20 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a 10 foot (10) wide by twelve foot (12) long shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 Existing Zoning Existing Use North General Business (GB) Northcliffe Golf Course South Right -of -Way Pebble Beach East Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential West Single- Familv Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.0 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.20 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a 10 foot (10) wide by twelve foot (12) long shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features do not exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; No special conditions of restricted area, topography, or physical features exist on the property to staff's knowledge, that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land that are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district. The City's accessory structure location requirements apply to all zoning designations within the City of Schertz. This variance is a request due to the subject property, and the subdivision HOA restrictions per the applicant's variance justifications. The subject property is immediately adjacent to the Northcliffe Golf Club and within the HOA restrictions for the Fairways of Scenic Hills, per the information provided to City staff by the applicant, there are stipulations that state that accessory structures, including sheds, cannot be located within the rear yard, which would be seen from the golf course. HOA restrictions are not City imposed or enforced and only apply to property within the HOA. The City does not have any requirements which would prohibit the safe placement of the shed in the backyard. 3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or The hardship is the result of the applicants own actions. The property owners received approval through the Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association- Architectural Control Committee, which indicated that the location was not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association, however the UDC separation requirement is still enforced. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications 4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. STAFF ANALYSIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of BOA 2018 -003. The request for a variance does comply with the approval criteria for granting a variance as presented above. Planning Department Recommendation Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* X Denial * While the Board can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. Attachments: Public hearing notice map Additional Exhibits Provided by Applicant Public hearing notice responses 3 IH 35 N o4 (75381) t� IH 35 N (75323) a j J rn crn-U O DmW � V J v Nam w Nvm ,w0mo w �n� _ca rn� 0. rn2WW m Comas County 5708 CROOKED °�9 0 !is a STI3C2K4) y ? (108 , ao v n m 5704 CROOKED m All CFO k STICK y�09``5(Q$a,Ol' O rte` °� (108323) 11�N0, off``' �, h PEBBLE BEACH (75325) ot �a1„fi a N SS(C I H I I E I Rl "' W ` E C[JMMUNITY * SERVICE* OPPORTUNITY m � OA M s Mu, . M M m t mn pm qn am Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory building and non-conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following criteria. State how your request meets these conditions. 1. Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of right commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? IX yes 0 No [--�xplain- There are numerous sheds that Violate the UDC intent within the same zoning district 2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject E3 parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? 0 Yes No FVI,i,,: Because the properties in question are located on the Northcliffe Golf Course, we are prohibited from placing the shed in what would be a compliant location in this area. 3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant's own actions or intended for financial interest? 1A Yes 11 No TWO MOO t 012g4WITZ] I #-A#'1111#r4111 in removing the sheds. OR XTIVINJ 4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity? 0 Yes 9 No Prepare Printed Date Pr is Signature: Name- pared: 9 2 16-Variance Checklist tlpatWd 10-2009 Page 2 of 2 17319 San Pedro, Suite 318 San Antonio TX, 78232 Phone: (210) 494-0659 Fax: (210) 494-0887 January 9, 2018 Judi Marinelli On behalf of the Architectural Control Committee for Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association, Inc., we time to properly document your improvement and seek approval. It is good neighbors like you that keep your community looking great! 1 All design plans submitted within your approved request must befollowed; 2. Any future maintenance of the improvement will be at the expense of the homeowner; 3. The improvement/installation and/or construction shall not affect drainage or water flow on this lot or neighboring lots; 4. Homeowner is responsible for obtaining any/all applicable city/county permits. not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association. Thank you for submitting your plans to the Architectural Control Committee, and congratulations on your new home improvement project! Dana Fenner ACC Coordinator TO' ygm E$NT- ---I (VOL. 14. M 181) FATE CHSN 1XV8STMENTS LLC CALLED 66,48 ACRES TRACT (r 'ILS Ato, R011060226) t4 . 5T45,00' E 76,20' (FAA-) tj 59 46'4O° E _ 76 21' (PIAIJ MM - N 6Y46'38' E 12 A 0 ME PEDESTAL TRANSFORM U, zo (g) ELECTRIC METER 4,N (PIAT) RECORDED ON PLAT z (F,M,) FIELD MEASURED LOT 17 Dzv— SETBASYorz) TWO STORY STONO & WOOD LOT 18, BLOCK 12 7980 Sq FT. 0.18 ACM i I Cot= go' D STAGE Mr LOT M 8) CPEO 33,av 26.18' 66.74' IRAN cy �w LOT 19 yr Y, -20, UTIMITY B61mr. (VM 14, PG. lot) in the boundery rsn ,Qfid no visiut Puy." adonce V e"IMIS or Lot 16, Block 12,7ho at Scenic Hill% Unit 1, Coma) County, Texas, accord I plot = In Volume 14, Pages 178-182, Plat Rocows of Comal according to To RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AMIGR CS AMTS RECORDED IN; PROPERTY P140TOGWH: ev" 110(8) 200205935152, 20D10642M, 2002W3042,20030000757$ 04.M 00(S). 200396042700, MKIAL REOM% MAL TEXTS MUME 1634. PAGE $2, OFFICIAL RECORDS; GUADAXOPE irmm: TEXAS VOLUME 1775, PAGE. 565, OFMIAL RECORDS, WAMUPE MM, TEXAS VOLUME 1811. PACE 369. OtW& REWROS. GUADALUPE MW TIM oowdol 0 A wn9 "004 LLQ bprvowt. ch." —Y a W S4 � tiv.. pw..0 *at .0 —1 "1 f.-.y —f ahq. .6 ew. mavens b�wd U. .port R—d by th. TIMe rmpa.j r.W O� ImW Om-A. W av,/r " an W, —q L X/�Lx Fire Retardant Intumescent Paint D E:1 When exposed to high heat, inturnescent paints begin a chemical reaction, swelling and expanding to many times its original size, creating a thick layer "Wa- "'"* #lw- "N one gallon and five gallon containers. Not rated for use on structural steel or spray polyurethane foam insulation m« »2,.y© Oktahoma City, OK 405-702-0055 \� �� � � TECHNOLOGIES General Descr!PVOW Contego PFB is a full-bodied latex. sinele cornQo2ent Loatiag ................ M, M ­Z.L.0 �W ICILC, U1 ITI s emical signature is identical to our HS (High Solids) version and can be used interchangeably. Technical Data: Color White Specific Gravity 1.26 pH Range 8.0-8.5 Weight/Gal 10.5 lbs (4.9 Kgs)* Hazardous Ingredients N/A Volume Solids 52.0% (+/- 2%) Weight Solids 515% (4-/- 2%) Viscosity 110 Kreb Units (+/- 10%) Flammability Not Flammable VOC. (LESS WATER) .01 GRAMS /LITRE (Nil) 'Does not include weight of packaging. contractor can apply it. Product Advantages: * Exceptional protection from heat and fire. * Smooth, thin, architectural grade finish. * Top coat with whatever you prefer alkyds, acrylics or lacquer. *Nontoxic, nondermatic and noncarcinogenic latex. * Can be pre-applied to steel and other material during fabrication and is easy to repair. * May be sprayed, brushed or rotted. No special equipment is required. Any qualffled contractor can apply it. * Interior or exterior application (use an exterior grade top coot, fear exterior applications). * Economically priced. * Fast drying and curing times. * Cleans tip with soap and water. *Ala shelf life limitations and does not need to be periodically reapplied, Intumescent CONTINUED Required Coating Thickness: Current recommendations are a maximum wet film thickness of 20 mils (.50mm), drying to 10 mils (.25mm). Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. The big advantage is impressive savings in application and labor costs and time. Forstructural steel applications, referto our calculator to determine required thickness forvarious substrates, densities and required ratings. Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. General Guidelines for Coating Thickness Requirements: All applications are enhanced by 2594. to 32% when top coated with a finish coat of your preference. Test results were based an comparative performance with a top coat of oil-based alkyd. Precautions: * Do not mix, thin or dilute the Contego product with anything else. * Do not allow the product to freeze. If frozen, the texture will be obviously different. Discard it. * Do not store in temperatures above 105'F (30'C) for extended periods of time. * Do not expose the product to rain, snow, dew or extreme humidity until top coated. warranty: Contego products are warranted for ten years from date of application against material defects. Proof of purchase (store receipt and bar code from can) is required for warranty claims. Claims are limited to replacement of product only, The Testing: Contego product are tested to a variety of standards such as UL, ULc, ASTM, NFPA, UBC, CEN, ISO, and others by the best Research Institute (SwRI), Omega Point, Guardian Laboratories, SGS/USTesting, KTA, Materials Analytical Services, MAGI and more. All labs are certified, accredited and audited. Test results are available online at www.contegointernational.com or can be obtained on DVD by contacting our customer services department or your local representative. Distributed by RDR Technologies, ILLC $35 SE 30th St, Suite C Oklahoma City, OK 73129 4OS-306-3062 Cantego International, Inc. (USA) PC Box 684 Westfield, IN 460 74 Leon - thanks for calling today. I'm attaching spec sheet for BanFire paint (Class A), and also Contego (time rated). I think Class A is all you should need. You will need to topcoat the f ire retardant paint with any standard exterior-grade latex. The BanFlre paint comes in white, tan, grey and black, so the tan would be closest to what you have now. Just let me know if you need anything else. Doug Stafford RDR Technologies 405-306-3062 c 405-702-0055 o cJ _k, Internet #100321591 Store SKU #419109 Sha Save to Favorites Print re Sheetrock Fig ode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. Gypsum Board a Fire-resistant gypsum board e For interior applications 0 Score and snap easily $9.981 each If you buy 48 or more $8w48/ each 8,i()4 mm A 'A Installation Options Product Overview a Intended for fire-rated applications h P I i -, r c � z 'a, r, S i � a e t i � 0 C F i 1 5 t x S p �s k i r o c 14 2 11 G 113 0 8 1 0 3 2 1 `,3n 51/94!18, 8�od PM Specifications ---------- Product Height (in.) OM5 Product Length (ft.) m Product Width (ft.) 0 Product Width (M.) 48 VVidth (ft) x Length (ft) 4 x 8 ? "a p,T -"w ,"n iSi?i,, ["St Ock- e-- C,, e- 5 - E', - in -x --� -f I, x -8 -£t -GV � sum 421 '110 11308 "10 032 1591 ',2 41 i p xupa.0mw�xaswumwouanVr�xu��m+necomu-coe'so-m��'�/+x�_/�qvpsmn-aoau-m�nonaooD000?/em �o�nu.u:o4nw Paomum4 Horne Model # 14211011309 Internet #202329713 Store SW #161148 S Share Save to Favorites Print Sheetrock F ecode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 9 ft. Gypsum Board $1500 leach '0 , - �, ..,.`:r; C., ry W Installation ''Options Product Overview Heavy, natural-finish face paper for durability and a clean look a 518 in. tapered edges provide smoother joints * Type X core offers greater fire resistance than regular panels * Easily scores and snaps to save tirne S M -41 ard --142 11011 -.,C,,9:zA23,2`9 /13 ;1 /2 t8 a 2 f- of * How much do YOU need? Let our calculator help: Info & GLAdes 0 Specificaflon You will need Adose @ AcrobatO Reader to view PDF documents, Downioad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Specifications '11 U2 Product VVidtih ('IQ m Drywall Features Fire Resistant ProdUCt Weight (lb.) 13 -1 rd - 14 1 0, 13 09 2 22, 9 P o t V,h , '' ��, r, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy MR, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy a Tapered edges for easily con ceale ddint s, a Light weight speeds installation, * For intedor applications * Use in new, or repair and remodel constnuction How much do you need? Let our calculater help: Info & GiAdes You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. • . . . . . . . . . . DEVELOPMENT 79- ` * The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 &00 pm. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schert Texas to consider and act upon the following item: I III Mel- OF veirtin bi MI-I.Mare YZ we 50t *Nur, Mis Man ifirtdU FUUE IIUIFI common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3761 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas 92= Emily Grobe Planner I -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------- Reply Form I am: in favor of opposed to ❑ neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-003 Comments: �7-6r � 31M,1 ft-681,6:- I Name:.,), b i , - Iq /i lei ly 6G z MW�� Your Name) I` Signatur,& Street Address: 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619,1000 1 e • • • - -f as- r - • f t�,. ■ * � � ssj P nBa, r:nrm DEVELOPMENT June 72O1O Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25'2010et 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400Sdlertz Parkway, Building #4Gohertz. Texas to consider and act upon the following item: 6]OA2010-003 — A request for a variance to UDC /\dide 8. S8CtOD 21.8.2.0 & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, io order fo permit o structure t0be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at37G1 Pebble Beach, City of(]chertz'CoDla| County, Texas Because you own property within 2OO feet ofthe subject property the Board would like bJ hear how you feel about this request and invites you tO attend the public hearing. If you are unable toattend but would like to 8XpRaso how you feel, p/e8S8 complete the bottom poFboD'ofthis letter and return before the public hearing date to {}if« of Sohertz Planning and Zoning [}iViSiVO. 1400 8ohedZ Parkvvmv, SChedz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 019-1789, oFE+0ai/: gg If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at21O Gh] � En1ilyGrobe Planner Reply Form |aD7: [] lP��� for: ~�~�~ Stree �� L­ (Please Print Your Name) Signature Q t Address:',n-c' 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 mz�� 1110 COMMUNITY 3)CHERTZ I SERVICE OPPORTUNITY PLANNING & C01V1MTi7J\rJTy DEVELOPMENT MW June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1,40.0 Sch ert z Pa k Texas to consider and act upon the following item: r way, Building,#4,. Schertz., BOA2018-006 — A request for a Variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Scherfz, Comal County, Texas. Because you own Property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to- attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas., 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: egrob-!@—schert_z.com If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. --- - - - - --- - ---------- - - - - ------------- — Reply Form i' favor of) opposed to' ❑ neutral to ❑ the request for: 13OA2018-005 I am: vvhoi 00 Comments: Dame: 0 11'-V "'i (Please Print Your Name) Street Address: k Date I Signature 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 111_ 210.819.1000 _*_ scharfz,cann ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to Vneutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-003 Comments:'// - --2a /OZ 1;44,� hL,44, VA.04 Name: 4)1 k L (5 CA-5 � z z r - i,; P, --- -, 'Z— (Please Print Your Name) Signature Street Address: 3 ? ?,6- P/ ,,� ;Z8 Date IV 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 scheliz.com Date (V� — �\- J\N 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 r3 schertz.con- ------------ -- I am: in favor of IC opposed to 1❑ neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-003 Comments: 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 schertz,com Emily Grobe Subject: RE: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills From: Steve and Teresa Date: 6/20/18 09:57 (GMT-06:00) To: marshals Subject: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills Jackie, (Marshals), At issue in our community (HOA) is the number of outbuildings (sheds) that have been installed, all of which are not in compliance with city code. That is to say they are not at least 10 feet away from the main structure (house), and/or not within the proper distance away from common property lines. Some of the homeowners have already received letters from the city, but they have disregarded the notice(s). Further and after the fact, some of the homeowners believe they can apply for a city variance which will allow them to keep their existing, non-compliant sheds. We don't want the city to be duped, and we don't want these non-compliant sheds to remain in our community. These sheds pose a fire and safety risk to our neighbors and community. We understand there is a city meeting This coming Monday to address variances regarding outbuildings (sheds). We want to ensure you are aware of what is going on in our community and to deny any requests for variances that will jeopardize the safety of the homes in our area, and around the city. Here is a list of some of the homes that clearly have non-compliant outbuildings (sheds): 6041 Covers Cove 3799 Pebble Beach 3788 Pebble Beach 3761 Pebble Beach 3692 Pebble Beach 3683 Pebble Beach 3675 Pebble Beach 3669 Pebble Beach 3672 Pebble Beach 3678 Pebble Beach 5709 Tuckatoe 3 717 Columbia Drive We would like to know what action the city is and/or will be taken to rectify this problem. Thank you, Steve and Teresa Smart TO: Board of Adjustment PREPARED BY: Emily Grobe, Planner PRESENTED BY: John Perry, Fire Marshal CASE: BOA 2018 -004 — 3717 Columbia Drive- Accessory Structures- Location SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3717 Columbia Drive, City of Schertz, Comal & Guadalupe County, Texas. REQUEST: The property owner is requesting a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures in order to permit an accessory structure, shed, to be located closer than three feet from the adjacent property line and closer than ten feet from the main residential structure located on the property. PUBLIC NOTICE: The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express News" on June 6, 2018. There were twenty three (23) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on June 7, 2018. At the time of this staff report three (3) responses in favor and one (1) (outside the 200' buffer )response opposed and zero (0) responses neutral to the request have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owners have installed a residential shed adjacent to their residential home. Per UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, accessory structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and shall be located no closer than ten feet (10') from the main building. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet, there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications. UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is in place due to life safety concerns in terms of accessory structures proximity to property lines and main structures. Specifically, this requirement is in place to protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City. Separation distances allow for increased operational ability and safety of first responders as well as surrounding residents. The separation distance requirements within the UDC are not only to protect the property owner of the main structure and accessory structure but also the adjacent property owners. In addition to the life safety concerns the separation distance requirements are also in place for aesthetic purposes very similar to front yard setbacks. Typical residential lot setbacks provide for a more open, inviting atmosphere for a neighborhood, and also reduce the feeling of looming buildings and compactness. The separation distance for accessory buildings to the main structure is for very similar reasons, to encourage that sense of space and openness for both the adjacent neighbor and the community as a whole. Although staff recognizes the aesthetics of the separation distance between the residential home and the shed, staff does not feel that not having the separation significantly negatively impacts the adjacent properties. SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is located approximately 575 feet east of the intersection of Columbia Drive and Pebble Beach, specifically at 3717 Columbia Drive. Existing Zoning Existing Use Single - Family Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: 1. The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.0 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.D Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 Existing Zoning Existing Use North Pre- Development (PRE) Northcliffe Golf Course South Right -of -Way Columbia Drive East Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential West Single- Familv Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: 1. The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.0 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.8.2.D Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features do not exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; No special conditions of restricted area, topography, or physical features exist on the property to staff's knowledge, that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land that are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district. The City's accessory structure location requirements apply to all zoning designations within the City of Schertz. This variance is a request due to the subject property, and the subdivision HOA restrictions per the applicant's variance justifications. The subject property is immediately adjacent to the Northcliffe Golf Club and within the HOA restrictions for the Fairways of Scenic Hills, per the information provided to City staff by the applicant, there are stipulations that state that accessory structures, including sheds, cannot be located within the rear yard, which would be seen from the golf course. HOA restrictions are not City imposed or enforced and only apply to property within the HOA. The City does not have any requirements which would prohibit the safe placement of the shed in the backyard. 3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or The hardship is the result of the applicants own actions. The property owners received approval through the Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association- Architectural Control Committee, which indicated that the location was not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association, however the UDC separation requirement is still enforced. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications 4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. STAFF ANALYSIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of BOA 2018 -004. The request for a variance does comply with the approval criteria for granting a variance as presented above. Planning Department Recommendation Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* X Denial * While the Board can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. Attachments: Public hearing notice map Additional Exhibits Provided by Applicant Public hearing notice responses 3 Ft� STANDREWS i "Yi al T"n J PEBBLE BEACH (75325) 3j43 CO4 3j39C,rr2j9olMejA OUnt`I 3)3 (�? 401, q Gofl�q� C e cOU,�ty Sn_ .1,o a a � m m J p1 n n M M I--,' F COUNTRY CLUB BLVD (63833) a ,,,-a X lG Id 5712 TUCKATOE�G (117430) Z' O �x 5708 TUCKATOE J y I--,' F COUNTRY CLUB BLVD (63833) CASE NUMBER Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory building and non-conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following criteria. State how your request meets these conditions. 8. 1. Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of -tight commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? 1Z Yes 0 No 2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? ff Yes 0 No Explain. Because the properties in question are located on the Northcliffe Golf Course, we are prohibited from placing the shed in what would be a compliant location in this area. 3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant's own actions or intended for financial interest? IM Yes 11 No We put the shed up following HOA protocol and per the assurance of Tuff Shed,that we were EMM �jl [�3i in removing the sheds. [wIiE 4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity? 0 Yes 9 No 16- Variance checklist Updated 10-2009 Page 2 of 2 111111, IN 17319 San Pedro, Suite 318 San Antonio TX, 78232 Phone: (210) 494-0659 Fax: (210) 494-0887 March 9, 2017 Walter D & Sharon Collins 3717 Columbia Cibolo, TX 78108 RE: Improvement Request Approval Notice For 3717 Columbia Dear Walter D & Sharon Collins: The Architectural Control Committee has reviewed and approved your request to install 3 flower beds, a paved grilling area, and a shed. The following stipulations gpph: 1. Meet and follow all guidelines and regulations set forth by the Federal, State, County and City governments, and all utility companies' regulations and that all construction must comply with the Associations Governing Documents. 2. Leave all areas surrounding the project, including the fences, public right-of-way, sidewalks, and streets, in like new-condition. 3. The material, color and roof shingles must match the house. You are advised approval by the Architectural Control Committee does not waive any provision of the restrictive covenants, any building code, any ordinance, rule, law, or statute that may affect such improvement. Architectural approval does not constitute the improvement being safe or sound, or being approved by the local government (city/county), but only that the improvement as requested is not prohibited by the restrictive covenants. Depending on the nature of your request, you may need to contact the local government authority (city/county) to obtain a permit. Thank you for your cooperation in submitting your plans to the Architectural Control Committee. If you have any questions, please call the number above and ask to speak with a representative in the site management department. Sincerely, Dana Fenner FIP LOT 41 7 -E.04011 I — — —'j T- LOT 40 1 STORY m BRICK & SIDING RES. #3717m Z M I -110 40 PVMT. — 60' 19 Ism 2,5' X 25' CUNC. A/C PAD E01 UTILITY EASEMENT BLDG. SETBACK CONC. CURB I LOT NO, 40 .BLOCK NO. 13 N.C.& NO.-- SUBI)IvjsjoN THE FAIRWAYS AT SCENIC HILLS �VOL, 15.. PAGE(S) 86 UNIT 2 STREET ADDRESS— J717 COLUMBIA LEEM F.I.P. 4 FOUND 1/2' IRON PIN S.I.P. i SET 1/2' IRON PIN P.I: DINT OF INTERSECTION F.C. POINT OF CURVE CITY--IC—HERTZ COMAL —COUNTY,TEXAS SURVEYED FOR FIRST AMERICAN _RRE CO. G.F. NOt P.T, POINT OF TANGENT C.M. CONTROLLING MONUMENT F,P. FOUND FENCE POST BUYER(S) P.U.D. - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT HIM-# STATE OF TEXAS 1. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT SITUATED WITHIN ZONE: °A' ACCORDING TO THE FLOOD 418NSURANOC6E051�ACTE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL NUMBER 0269 EFFECTIVE SEPT ig 92 DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY- 2, BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE RECORDED PLAT, THIS PROPERTY IS SUBJECT TO RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS RECORDED IN, OF COUNTY OF BEXAR 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT IS TRL CORRECT AND AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF THE PROPERTY ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND UNDER MY SUPERVISION AND EXCEPT AS SHOWN ABOVE THERE ARE NO VISIBLE DISCREPANCIES, CONFLICTS, PROTRUSIONS OR INTRUSIONS, OVERLAPPING OF IMPROVEMENTS, EASEMENTS, OR RIGHT-OF-WAY. VOL--§--PG 745 VOL —163I PG 62 VOL-177-5 P& 565 lfi9 Nint 1932 Dr, 310 vni 2082 sir.. 675 --- THIS-0—RODAY OF MARCH 2005 A.D. har Save to Favorites Print Se SHEETROCK Brand UltraLight Fir e 30 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. Tapered Edge Gypsum Board a Lightweight gypsum board * Easier to lift, carry and install * Strength & impact resistance comparable to standard 5/8 in Type X 214 6 3 8:4'� PM I f Fire Retardant Intumescent Paint D E:1 When exposed to high heat, inturnescent paints begin a chemical reaction, swelling and expanding to many times its original size, creating a thick layer "Wa- "'"* #lw- "N one gallon and five gallon containers. Not rated for use on structural steel or spray polyurethane foam insulation m« »2,.y© Oktahoma City, OK 405-702-0055 \� �� � � TECHNOLOGIES General Descr!PVOW Contego PFB is a full-bodied latex. sinele cornQo2ent Loatiag ................ M, M ­Z.L.0 �W ICILC, U1 ITI s emical signature is identical to our HS (High Solids) version and can be used interchangeably. Technical Data: Color White Specific Gravity 1.26 pH Range 8.0-8.5 Weight/Gal 10.5 lbs (4.9 Kgs)* Hazardous Ingredients N/A Volume Solids 52.0% (+/- 2%) Weight Solids 515% (4-/- 2%) Viscosity 110 Kreb Units (+/- 10%) Flammability Not Flammable VOC. (LESS WATER) .01 GRAMS /LITRE (Nil) 'Does not include weight of packaging. contractor can apply it. Product Advantages: * Exceptional protection from heat and fire. * Smooth, thin, architectural grade finish. * Top coat with whatever you prefer alkyds, acrylics or lacquer. *Nontoxic, nondermatic and noncarcinogenic latex. * Can be pre-applied to steel and other material during fabrication and is easy to repair. * May be sprayed, brushed or rotted. No special equipment is required. Any qualffled contractor can apply it. * Interior or exterior application (use an exterior grade top coot, fear exterior applications). * Economically priced. * Fast drying and curing times. * Cleans tip with soap and water. *Ala shelf life limitations and does not need to be periodically reapplied, Intumescent CONTINUED Required Coating Thickness: Current recommendations are a maximum wet film thickness of 20 mils (.50mm), drying to 10 mils (.25mm). Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. The big advantage is impressive savings in application and labor costs and time. Forstructural steel applications, referto our calculator to determine required thickness forvarious substrates, densities and required ratings. Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. General Guidelines for Coating Thickness Requirements: All applications are enhanced by 2594. to 32% when top coated with a finish coat of your preference. Test results were based an comparative performance with a top coat of oil-based alkyd. Precautions: * Do not mix, thin or dilute the Contego product with anything else. * Do not allow the product to freeze. If frozen, the texture will be obviously different. Discard it. * Do not store in temperatures above 105'F (30'C) for extended periods of time. * Do not expose the product to rain, snow, dew or extreme humidity until top coated. warranty: Contego products are warranted for ten years from date of application against material defects. Proof of purchase (store receipt and bar code from can) is required for warranty claims. Claims are limited to replacement of product only, The Testing: Contego product are tested to a variety of standards such as UL, ULc, ASTM, NFPA, UBC, CEN, ISO, and others by the best Research Institute (SwRI), Omega Point, Guardian Laboratories, SGS/USTesting, KTA, Materials Analytical Services, MAGI and more. All labs are certified, accredited and audited. Test results are available online at www.contegointernational.com or can be obtained on DVD by contacting our customer services department or your local representative. Distributed by RDR Technologies, ILLC $35 SE 30th St, Suite C Oklahoma City, OK 73129 4OS-306-3062 Cantego International, Inc. (USA) PC Box 684 Westfield, IN 460 74 Leon - thanks for calling today. I'm attaching spec sheet for BanFire paint (Class A), and also Contego (time rated). I think Class A is all you should need. You will need to topcoat the f ire retardant paint with any standard exterior-grade latex. The BanFlre paint comes in white, tan, grey and black, so the tan would be closest to what you have now. Just let me know if you need anything else. Doug Stafford RDR Technologies 405-306-3062 c 405-702-0055 o cJ _k, Internet #100321591 Store SKU #419109 Sha Save to Favorites Print re Sheetrock Fig ode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. Gypsum Board a Fire-resistant gypsum board e For interior applications 0 Score and snap easily $9.981 each If you buy 48 or more $8w48/ each 8,i()4 mm A 'A Installation Options Product Overview a Intended for fire-rated applications h P I i -, r c � z 'a, r, S i � a e t i � 0 C F i 1 5 t x S p �s k i r o c 14 2 11 G 113 0 8 1 0 3 2 1 `,3n 51/94!18, 8�od PM Specifications ---------- Product Height (in.) OM5 Product Length (ft.) m Product Width (ft.) 0 Product Width (M.) 48 VVidth (ft) x Length (ft) 4 x 8 ? "a p,T -"w ,"n iSi?i,, ["St Ock- e-- C,, e- 5 - E', - in -x --� -f I, x -8 -£t -GV � sum 421 '110 11308 "10 032 1591 ',2 41 i p xupa.0mw�xaswumwouanVr�xu��m+necomu-coe'so-m��'�/+x�_/�qvpsmn-aoau-m�nonaooD000?/em �o�nu.u:o4nw Paomum4 Horne Model # 14211011309 Internet #202329713 Store SW #161148 S Share Save to Favorites Print Sheetrock F ecode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 9 ft. Gypsum Board $1500 leach '0 , - �, ..,.`:r; C., ry W Installation ''Options Product Overview Heavy, natural-finish face paper for durability and a clean look a 518 in. tapered edges provide smoother joints * Type X core offers greater fire resistance than regular panels * Easily scores and snaps to save tirne S M -41 ard --142 11011 -.,C,,9:zA23,2`9 /13 ;1 /2 t8 a 2 f- of * How much do YOU need? Let our calculator help: Info & GLAdes 0 Specificaflon You will need Adose @ AcrobatO Reader to view PDF documents, Downioad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Specifications '11 U2 Product VVidtih ('IQ m Drywall Features Fire Resistant ProdUCt Weight (lb.) 13 -1 rd - 14 1 0, 13 09 2 22, 9 P o t V,h , '' ��, r, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy MR, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy a Tapered edges for easily con ceale ddint s, a Light weight speeds installation, * For intedor applications * Use in new, or repair and remodel constnuction How much do you need? Let our calculater help: Info & GiAdes You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIIERTZ I OPPORTUNITY I] Kyj 01 Re] Iffid I OWN June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25,2018ot 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex CoURd/ {}h@DObn[n. 1400 Gohertz Parkway, Building #4, 8ohertz' Texas to consider and act upon the following item: BOA2018-004 —A request for a V@r8DCe to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2I. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from oonlnOoD property lines and to permit 8 St[UotUns to be closer than ten feet from the [DoiO building located at 3717 Columbia Drive, City DfSoh8rtz,CoD1a| County, Texas Because you own property within -200feet of the subject the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable t0attend but VVOU|d like to eXpReao how you feel, please complete the bottom i of this |8ths[ and return before the public hearing date to City of 8ch8rtZ Planning and Zoning [)/WSioD. 1400 Schertz Parkway, 8chertz, Texas, 78154or fax (71U)61S-1788,ore-08i|: |f you have any questions please feel free to call Emily BrObe' Planner directly 8t21O-019-1784. Si DMAM Emily Grobe Planner 60�u 1400 Schertzparxmay Schmrtz, Texas 7mnu 210.619o000 scMedz.=om Emily Grobe Subject: RE: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills From: Steve and Teresa Date: 6/20/18 09:57 (GMT-06:00) To: marshals Subject: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills Jackie, (Marshals), At issue in our community (HOA) is the number of outbuildings (sheds) that have been installed, all of which are not in compliance with city code. That is to say they are not at least 10 feet away from the main structure (house), and/or not within the proper distance away from common property lines. Some of the homeowners have already received letters from the city, but they have disregarded the notice(s). Further and after the fact, some of the homeowners believe they can apply for a city variance which will allow them to keep their existing, non-compliant sheds. We don't want the city to be duped, and we don't want these non-compliant sheds to remain in our community. These sheds pose a fire and safety risk to our neighbors and community. We understand there is a city meeting This coming Monday to address variances regarding outbuildings (sheds). We want to ensure you are aware of what is going on in our community and to deny any requests for variances that will jeopardize the safety of the homes in our area, and around the city. Here is a list of some of the homes that clearly have non-compliant outbuildings (sheds): 6041 Covers Cove 3799 Pebble Beach 3788 Pebble Beach 3761 Pebble Beach 3692 Pebble Beach 3683 Pebble Beach 3675 Pebble Beach 3669 Pebble Beach 3672 Pebble Beach 3678 Pebble Beach 5709 Tuckatoe 3 717 Columbia Drive We would like to know what action the city is and/or will be taken to rectify this problem. Thank you, Steve and Teresa Smart TO: Board of Adjustment PREPARED BY: Emily Grobe, Planner PRESENTED BY: John Perry, Fire Marshal CASE: BOA 2018 -005 — 3777 Pebble Beach- Accessory Structures- Location SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. REQUEST: The property owner is requesting a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures in order to permit an accessory structure, shed, to be located closer than three feet from the adjacent property line and closer than ten feet from the main residential structure located on the property. PUBLIC NOTICE: The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express News" on June 6, 2018. There were eighteen (18) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on June 7, 2018. At the time of this staff report four (4) responses (including 1 response outside the 200' buffer) in favor and four (4) response opposed and one (1) response neutral to the request have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The property owners have installed a ten foot (10') wide by twelve foot (12) long shed adjacent to their residential home. Per UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, accessory structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and shall be located no closer than ten feet (10') from the main building. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet, there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications. UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is in place due to life safety concerns in terms of accessory structures proximity to property lines and main structures. Specifically, this requirement is in place to protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City. Separation distances allow for increased operational ability and safety of first responders as well as surrounding residents. The separation distance requirements within the UDC are not only to protect the property owner of the main structure and accessory structure but also the adjacent property owners. In addition to the life safety concerns the separation distance requirements are also in place for aesthetic purposes very similar to front yard setbacks. Typical residential lot setbacks provide for a more open, inviting atmosphere for a neighborhood, and also reduce the feeling of looming buildings and compactness. The separation distance for accessory buildings to the main structure is for very similar reasons, to encourage that sense of space and openness for both the adjacent neighbor and the community as a whole. Although staff recognizes the aesthetics of the separation distance between the residential home and the shed, staff does not feel that not having the separation significantly negatively impacts the adjacent properties. SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is located approximately 500 feet north east of the intersection of Columbia Drive and Pebble Beach, specifically at 3777 Pebble Beach. Existing Zoning Existing Use Single - Family Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.82C Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.82D Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a 10 foot (10) wide by twelve foot (12) long shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 Existing Zoning Existing Use North General Business (GB) / Northcliffe Golf Course Pre- Development (PRE) South Right -of -Way Pebble Beach East Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential West Single- Family Residential (R -6) Residential CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; The variance does violate the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.82C Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to provide a separation between accessory buildings, uses or structures and the common property line of at least three feet (3) in order to reduce the life safety risk. Additionally, the variance violates the intent of the UDC and its amendments because the intent of Section 21.82D Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures is to not allow accessory buildings, uses or structures to be located closer than ten feet (10) to the main building in order to reduce the risk to life safety. The applicant has installed an accessory structure, specifically a 10 foot (10) wide by twelve foot (12) long shed within the designated separation distance between the accessory structure and the adjacent property line. Additionally, the shed has been placed adjacent to the residential structure, not accounting for the required ten foot (10) separation from the residential structure. The applicant has provided information on alternative materials in order to make the accessory structures more fire resistant. This includes Fire Code Core, Gypsum Board (a type of sheetrock), Conteg Intumescent Fire Barrier Latex paint, and BanFire- fire retardant intumescent paint. Although the sheetrock and paint would provide additional fire protection, City staff has concerns on the functionality of these material when used in conjunction with a residential shed. In order for the sheetrock to properly function as fire protection the walls of the shed could not have any punctures / holes within the sheetrock. For example a typical resident would want to hang items and install shelves into their shed for storage. By doing these practices the fire protecting sheetrock would no longer be as effective as if the sheetrock was left whole. Both the sheetrock and the paint would be an ongoing maintenance concern for both the resident and City staff. 2 2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features do not exist that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; No special conditions of restricted area, topography, or physical features exist on the property to staff's knowledge, that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land that are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district. The City's accessory structure location requirements apply to all zoning designations within the City of Schertz. This variance is a request due to the subject property, and the subdivision HOA restrictions per the applicant's variance justifications. The subject property is immediately adjacent to the Northcliffe Golf Club and within the HOA restrictions for the Fairways of Scenic Hills, per the information provided to City staff by the applicant, there are stipulations that state that accessory structures, including sheds, cannot be located within the rear yard, which would be seen from the golf course. HOA restrictions are not City imposed or enforced and only apply to property within the HOA. The City does not have any requirements which would prohibit the safe placement of the shed in the backyard. 3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or The hardship is the result of the applicants own actions. The property owners received approval through the Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association- Architectural Control Committee, which indicated that the location was not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association, however the UDC separation requirement is still enforced. Due to the size of the shed being under 120 square feet there is no requirement to pull a permit however, all sheds are still required to be installed in accordance with the UDC specifications 4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. STAFF ANALYSIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of BOA 2018 -005. The request for a variance does comply with the approval criteria for granting a variance as presented above. Planning Department Recommendation Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* X Denial * While the Board can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. Attachments: Public hearing notice map Additional Exhibits Provided by Applicant Public hearing notice responses 3 fell „. IH 35 N (75381) w 133 w tee+ mv v �H omv so f N Dm °wmY'� m2W x'207 W m <o �m N.nto m r o Cb v m v a U m Como! County g Gro� m QQ-o —� oo� QOM Xm � 5708 CROOKED STICK 324) o �Wn 4' t (10 N W = co w a V X19 0g3��\ �, n<� 5704 CROOKED STICK' m . Z 0� 9yQ, �+ m Q�G�1 3� (108323) a31 lb(b'0", �ry10�v� \�0 lzll G gt9 yl9\ P 3 80o GN' gEP3291 �`9rn kw° PEBBLE BEACH " (75325) CASE NUMBER Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory building and non-conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following criteria. State how your request meets these conditions. Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of right commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? 11 Yes 0 No ExPlainJ"re are numerous sheds that viiolate the UDC intent within the same zoning district 2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? Yes 11 No Explain: Because the properties in question are located on the Northcliffe Golf Course, we are prohibited from Placing; the shed in what would be a compliant location in this area. 3. Is the hardship the result • the applicant's own actions • intended for financial interest? N Yes 0 N* A in removing the sheds. 4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity? 0 Yes 9 No Explairr.-'!'Te have additonal options including the use of fire retardant paint and 3 hour sheetrock, 16-Variance Checklist Updated 10-2009 Page 2 of 2 Fairways at Scenic Hills Homeowners Association, Inc. 17319 San Pedro, Suite 318 San Antonio TX, 78232 Phone: (210) 494-0659 Fax: (210) 494-0887 3777 Pebble Beach Cibolo, TX 78108 time to properly document your improvement and seek approval. It is good neighbors like you that keep your ity looking great! communi l All design plans submitted within your approved request must be followed; 2. Any future maintenance of the improvement will be at the expense of the homeowner; 3. The improvement/installation and/or construction shall not affect drainage or water flow on this lot or neighboring lots; 4. Homeowner is responsible for obtaining any/all applicable city/county permits. Approval does not constitute the improvement being safe or sound; only that the improvement, as requested, is not prohibited by the restrictive covenants of the association. Thank you for submitting your plans to the Architectural Control Committee, and congratulations on your new home improvement project! Dana Fenner ACC Coordinator P.I.Y. 5' SETBACK 1 i 5' SETBACK LINE LOY' 22 z � ELK 12— GONG. 4,3' PA T70 I4.3 40.3° 'Co 1 ROCK Co SIDING � � t RES. 3777, 220 ETBACKS E ti uIr o cov u CONC. 8.8' uo PCTRCN 5' C3 4'x4' CON 2.5 0 7 . C. PAD 2.0' " 0.8' Z 9 10 r' 19.9' 4X4` ELEC. TRANS W 17.0` GG?NC. 4 "4' 26,37' TO FIP. CONC. DPIVE WALK ELEC. TRANS @ LOT 24 CM ill F.l.P.ICl 2 Ar c 5 7. ' �SlAt= PEBBLE BEACH CO1yc —� 30' PVMT. — 50" R.O.W. LOT Moo 23 BLOCK NO. 12 N.C.B. MO. LE PI Fl?. P.: FOUND 1/2" IRON FIN SUBDIVISION THE FAIRKIAYS AT SCENIC HILLS SET PIN UNIT 7 VOL. 14 PAGE(S) i78 -182 , PIP: POINT OF�INITERSECTION STREET ADDRESS 3777 PEBBLE BEACH P C. POINT OF CURVE CITY SCHERTZ CO AL COUNTY, TEXAS. P T. POINT OF TANGENT C.M. CONTROLLING MONUMENT SURVEYED FOP rIRST AMERICAN 177LE CO. G.F. NO. F.C. FOUND FENCE CORNER BUYERS) STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABO.EL PLAT 15 TRUE, NOTES: CQRRFCT AND AN A{':CIIR:d'S1• Ri= PF2FfiFhiiATlfTN i1F A MEOW Fire Retardant Intumescent Paint D E:1 When exposed to high heat, inturnescent paints begin a chemical reaction, swelling and expanding to many times its original size, creating a thick layer "Wa- � "'"* #lw- "N M - M M one gallon and five gallon containers. Not rated for use on structural steel or spray polyurethane foam insulation RDR Technologies Oktahoma City, OK 405-702-0055 TECHNOLOGIES General Descr!PVOW Contego PFB is a full-bodied latex. sinele cornQo2ent Loatiag ................ M, M ­Z.L.0 �W ICILC, U1 ITI s emical signature is identical to our HS (High Solids) version and can be used interchangeably. Technical Data: Color White Specific Gravity 1.26 pH Range 8.0-8.5 Weight/Gal 10.5 lbs (4.9 Kgs)* Hazardous Ingredients N/A Volume Solids 52.0% (+/- 2%) Weight Solids 515% (4-/- 2%) Viscosity 110 Kreb Units (+/- 10%) Flammability Not Flammable VOC. (LESS WATER) .01 GRAMS /LITRE (Nil) 'Does not include weight of packaging. contractor can apply it. Product Advantages: * Exceptional protection from heat and fire. * Smooth, thin, architectural grade finish. * Top coat with whatever you prefer alkyds, acrylics or lacquer. *Nontoxic, nondermatic and noncarcinogenic latex. * Can be pre-applied to steel and other material during fabrication and is easy to repair. * May be sprayed, brushed or rotted. No special equipment is required. Any qualffled contractor can apply it. * Interior or exterior application (use an exterior grade top coot, fear exterior applications). * Economically priced. * Fast drying and curing times. * Cleans tip with soap and water. *Ala shelf life limitations and does not need to be periodically reapplied, Intumescent CONTINUED Required Coating Thickness: Current recommendations are a maximum wet film thickness of 20 mils (.50mm), drying to 10 mils (.25mm). Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. The big advantage is impressive savings in application and labor costs and time. Forstructural steel applications, referto our calculator to determine required thickness forvarious substrates, densities and required ratings. Contact a qualified Contego representative with further questions. General Guidelines for Coating Thickness Requirements: All applications are enhanced by 2594. to 32% when top coated with a finish coat of your preference. Test results were based an comparative performance with a top coat of oil-based alkyd. Precautions: * Do not mix, thin or dilute the Contego product with anything else. * Do not allow the product to freeze. If frozen, the texture will be obviously different. Discard it. * Do not store in temperatures above 105'F (30'C) for extended periods of time. * Do not expose the product to rain, snow, dew or extreme humidity until top coated. warranty: Contego products are warranted for ten years from date of application against material defects. Proof of purchase (store receipt and bar code from can) is required for warranty claims. Claims are limited to replacement of product only, The Testing: Contego product are tested to a variety of standards such as UL, ULc, ASTM, NFPA, UBC, CEN, ISO, and others by the best Research Institute (SwRI), Omega Point, Guardian Laboratories, SGS/USTesting, KTA, Materials Analytical Services, MAGI and more. All labs are certified, accredited and audited. Test results are available online at www.contegointernational.com or can be obtained on DVD by contacting our customer services department or your local representative. Distributed by RDR Technologies, ILLC $35 SE 30th St, Suite C Oklahoma City, OK 73129 4OS-306-3062 Cantego International, Inc. (USA) PC Box 684 Westfield, IN 460 74 Leon - thanks for calling today. I'm attaching spec sheet for BanFire paint (Class A), and also Contego (time rated). I think Class A is all you should need. You will need to topcoat the f ire retardant paint with any standard exterior-grade latex. The BanFlre paint comes in white, tan, grey and black, so the tan would be closest to what you have now. Just let me know if you need anything else. Doug Stafford RDR Technologies 405-306-3062 c 405-702-0055 o cJ _k, Internet #100321591 Store SKU #419109 Sha Save to Favorites Print re Sheetrock Fig ode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 8 ft. Gypsum Board a Fire-resistant gypsum board e For interior applications 0 Score and snap easily $9.981 each If you buy 48 or more $8w48/ each 8,i()4 mm A 'A Installation Options Product Overview a Intended for fire-rated applications h P I i -, r c � z 'a, r, S i � a e t i � 0 C F i 1 5 t x S p �s k i r o c 14 2 11 G 113 0 8 1 0 3 2 1 `,3n 51/94!18, 8�od PM Specifications ---------- Product Height (in.) OM5 Product Length (ft.) m Product Width (ft.) 0 Product Width (M.) 48 VVidth (ft) x Length (ft) 4 x 8 ? "a p,T -"w ,"n iSi?i,, ["St Ock- e-- C,, e- 5 - E', - in -x --� -f I, x -8 -£t -GV � sum 421 '110 11308 "10 032 1591 ',2 41 i p xupa.0mw�xaswumwouanVr�xu��m+necomu-coe'so-m��'�/+x�_/�qvpsmn-aoau-m�nonaooD000?/em �o�nu.u:o4nw Paomum4 Horne Model # 14211011309 Internet #202329713 Store SW #161148 S Share Save to Favorites Print Sheetrock F ecode Core 5/8 in. x 4 ft. x 9 ft. Gypsum Board $1500 leach '0 , - �, ..,.`:r; C., ry W Installation ''Options Product Overview Heavy, natural-finish face paper for durability and a clean look a 518 in. tapered edges provide smoother joints * Type X core offers greater fire resistance than regular panels * Easily scores and snaps to save tirne S M -41 ard --142 11011 -.,C,,9:zA23,2`9 /13 ;1 /2 t8 a 2 f- of * How much do YOU need? Let our calculator help: Info & GLAdes 0 Specificaflon You will need Adose @ AcrobatO Reader to view PDF documents, Downioad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Specifications '11 U2 Product VVidtih ('IQ m Drywall Features Fire Resistant ProdUCt Weight (lb.) 13 -1 rd - 14 1 0, 13 09 2 22, 9 P o t V,h , '' ��, r, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy MR, Installation Options Product Overview Intended for commercial or residential appi'lcatlons where 518 in. type X paneis are not required Nor-corribustible core is encesed in 100% recycled fisce arid back paper * Score and snap easHy a Tapered edges for easily con ceale ddint s, a Light weight speeds installation, * For intedor applications * Use in new, or repair and remodel constnuction How much do you need? Let our calculater help: Info & GiAdes You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. You will need Adobe(& Acrobat(D Reader to view PDF docurnents, ,, ovv—Joad a free copy from the Adobe Web site. Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-005 Comments: Name: Id141-16 r S T (Please Print Yo ur Name) Signature Street Address: Date � —/:3—/9- 1400 Schertz Parkway ScherLz, Texas 78154 a 210.619.1000 schailz.com - ------------------------------- Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-005 Comments: Name: (Please Print Your Name) Street Address: 1?j6A0Lj-C 19ell Date k "/[ — I WO Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 r 210,619.1000 schertz.com Reply Form I am: in favor of opposed to ❑ neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-005 Comments: Name: (Please Print Street Address: W Date COMMUNITY SERVICE C HIERTZ - I OPPORTUNITY UMMAMAUJITCAN LOAN June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: U-1 lk The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas10-corisideT and -act iipon,-tho"foffciw-iiTg-it6rff.------- BOA2018-005 - A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.0. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Because you own property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: egrobe@srhertt.com If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. R- epl -y -'F Mr m I am: in favor of 0 opposed toX neutral to 0 the request for: 13OA2018-006 "00� 'a0W CM WiDE 00 144 \Ai�k M fLftcrl SIVAL)CW91E. Comments, a_j3 %ik�Np'os AK91fi_ SPkCg f MPI ACS Wt-V_4 5CM (ZLP I (Please Print Your Name) Street Address: 396C%mL E JA C" Date -G(M/26ii? re 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 I.Ar 210.619.1000 sbhe'tz'corn ISM-11F ly i I U 1� June 7, 2018 Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and act upon the following item: BOA2018-005 — A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.0. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Because you own property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: ggrgtg HI oher z.00 If you have any questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. I am: in favor of ('nmmpnfcz- Name: Street Address: Reply Form 11 opposed to_"11 neutral to ❑ the request for: BOA2018-005 I C/ Date Zr' — z 3— IL) I — ­­­- — 0-k— *r^ --- 70icA 11 nin nqn Innn -` ___1 COMMUNITY SERVICE J ERT Z I OPPORTUNITY 11 ATA 01 K11, NO I NO Dear Property Owner: The City of Schertz Board of Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas exas to consider and act upon the following item: BOA2018-005 — A request for a variance to UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, in order to permit a structure to be set back less than three feet from common property lines and to permit a structure to be closer than ten feet from the main building located at 3777 Pebble Beach, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Because you own property within 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. If you are unable to attend but would like to express how you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return before the public hearing date to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas, 78154 or fax (210) 619-1789, or e-mail: egrobe schertz.com If you have any y questions please feel free to call Emily Grobe, Planner directly at 210-619-1784. Reply Form r'�favor I am oJ opposed to ❑ neutral to SX Ilerequest for: BOA2018-005 ments: x-7) c� Name: (2- __,_ �- L -ID _r G' (Please Print Your Name) Street Address Date -r---- 701 rA 01 n �1 () I nr)n J_ ­t­4, PLANNING & COjY'ttYIUNTry DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING June 7 2018 Dear Property owner: The City ofSchertz Board of Adjustment 6.00 pm. at the Municipal Complex Coun City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. lin 200 feet of the subject property the Board would like to hoar how I invites you to attend the public hearing, if you are unable, to attend you feel, please complete the bottom portion of this letter and return e to City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Division, 1400 Schertz ►4 or fax (210) 619 -1789, or e -mail: egrobe@schertz.com if you have o call Emily Grobe Planner directly at 210.619 -1784. Scanned with C ,tea _7 t , a ' t e t MIT, dMa 011 Y"0201.01, I A DEVELOPMENT The City of Schertz Board • Adjustment will conduct a Public Hearing on Monday, June 25, 2018 91 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Scheftl Texas to consider and act upon the following item: Sincerely, Emily Grobe Planner I -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reply Form I am: in favor of opposed to ❑ neutral to ❑ the request for: BO A2018-003 0 1 IN - 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 210.619.1000 Emily Grobe Subject: RE: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills From: Steve and Teresa Date: 6/20/18 09:57 (GMT-06:00) To: marshals Subject: City Code Violations of Outbuildings (sheds) at the Fairways of Scenic Hills Jackie, (Marshals), At issue in our community (HOA) is the number of outbuildings (sheds) that have been installed, all of which are not in compliance with city code. That is to say they are not at least 10 feet away from the main structure (house), and/or not within the proper distance away from common property lines. Some of the homeowners have already received letters from the city, but they have disregarded the notice(s). Further and after the fact, some of the homeowners believe they can apply for a city variance which will allow them to keep their existing, non-compliant sheds. We don't want the city to be duped, and we don't want these non-compliant sheds to remain in our community. These sheds pose a fire and safety risk to our neighbors and community. We understand there is a city meeting This coming Monday to address variances regarding outbuildings (sheds). We want to ensure you are aware of what is going on in our community and to deny any requests for variances that will jeopardize the safety of the homes in our area, and around the city. Here is a list of some of the homes that clearly have non-compliant outbuildings (sheds): 6041 Covers Cove 3799 Pebble Beach 3788 Pebble Beach 3761 Pebble Beach 3692 Pebble Beach 3683 Pebble Beach 3675 Pebble Beach 3669 Pebble Beach 3672 Pebble Beach 3678 Pebble Beach 5709 Tuckatoe 3 717 Columbia Drive We would like to know what action the city is and/or will be taken to rectify this problem. Thank you, Steve and Teresa Smart April 18, 2018 Reports from Boards and Commissions BOA — March 26, 2018 The Board of Adjustments did not meet in March as there were no items to consider. Planning and Zoning Commission — March 28, 2018 and April 11, 2018 (Cancelled). At their March 28 meeting, the Commission approved a number of plats. Additionally they discussed recommending that City Council consider City initiated zoning cases in areas where the current zoning is not consistent with the Future Land Use Plan. As part of that discussion staff noted that it might be more beneficial to have staff continue to focus on updating the Unified Development Code (UDC) in light of the relatively small amount of land that was likely to actually develop in a manner at odds with the City's Future Land Use Plan. The Commission also discussed the need to update the Future Land Use Plan. The Commission will potentially revisit this issue in the future. The April 11 meeting was cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. TSAC — April 5, 2018 The Commission discussed recent complaints about parking on Westchester Drive. The street is wide enough to accommodate parking on one side (as is currently the case) and that having cars parked on one side serves to slow down traffic (as wider road sections can encourage speeding). The problem seems to be people crossing Westchester mid -block after they park their cars. The ultimate solution is to provide sidewalks along that side of Westchester to allow people who park on the street the ability to use the sidewalk to get to Elbel. TSAC also discussed challenges for pedestrians trying to cross Borgfeld Road at Dietz Road after the recent improvements. Staff is researching the cost of modifying the signal, curbs and sidewalks to improve the situation. Staff also discussed adding bike lanes on both sides of Fairlawn Avenue and Belmont Parkway to provide safer bike access and to slow vehicle traffic on both roads where speeding has been a concern. These improvements are not currently budgeted and would need to be considered as part of the upcoming budget. Historic Preservation — March 8, 2018 The SHPC has not met since the last CCAB meeting. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board — March 26, 2018 The Parks Board reviewed the new Parks Program Guide that was distributed with the most recent issue of Schertz Magazine. The board also discussed holding a regional parks board workshop as a way to improve communication and coordination amongst communities in the area, particularly as it relates to hike and bike trail networks and connectivity. A subcommittee of the board is going to continue focusing on this concept. The board also discussed a petition from residents near Forrest Ridge Park for improvements to their park. After discussing the matter, the board felt that in light of easements encumbering the park and higher funding priorities, they were not inclined to support recommending providing these requested additional improvements, but wanted to review the list of park funding priorities before making a final decision. Library Board —April 1, 2018 At their April meeting, the Library Board received reports on the board's finances, library usage and the bookstore. They also discussed bringing soup for the Library staff during Library Appreciation week. Schertz Economic Development Corporation — March 22, 2017 The SEDC Board has worked over the last seven years to build a reserve fund so that all economic development incentives could be funded through the SEDC thereby freeing up the City's general fund for other purposes. The SEDC currently has $15 million that the SEDC Board has planned for company direct incentives and infrastructure improvements. Staff presented an update on the annual certification for companies with active incentive agreements. Currently the SEDC and City have incentive agreements with nine companies, seven of which were required to report their compliance to their agreements for the 2017 calendar year. Each of these companies reported, and were found by the SEDC staff to be in compliance with their agreement except Amazon whose certification report is not due until April. Staff presented an update on the recruitment efforts by the SEDC. Staff continues to implement the recruitment strategy which involves digital marketing campaigns to potential companies and recruitment trips to strategic events and regions to meet with companies and consultants. Over the past quarter, the SEDC's website activity remained consistent from the previous quarter. Staff has begun rolling out blog posts that will be used to increase website engagement. Additionally, staff executed an aggressive recruitment trip schedule which included seven events. The SEDC Board deliberated regarding the future purchase of property located within the Freeway Manor Subdivision and allocating funds to the upcoming budget to purchase the lots as they became available. The property is located off Interstate 35 between FM 2252 and FM 1103 near the Belmont Subdivision. The subdivision is 66.9 acres and consists of 247 parcels, of which the City currently owns 51. After discussion relating to potential Projects that the SEDC is authorized to fund, the SEDC Board decided that it would be more appropriate for the City to focus on this redevelopment effort and for the SEDC to continue to focus on its mission of attracting /retaining primary jobs and infrastructure improvements. The Board discussed three Projects in closed session, no action was taken. Committee of Committees Advisory Board Summary CCAB Notes 04/18/18: Mr. James gave the City Manager update. He spoke about some new things staff is doing this year. Examples include the Parks and Rec Guide, the Movin' on Main event, and the upcoming Shred Day event. Now that some of these have taken place, it will allow for discussions on funding to expand, improve or reach a wider audience on several of these new items. Staff also had a preliminary budget retreat with City Council since the last CCAB meeting. This year past budget year, staff went deeper into items requested by various City departments and showed and discussed with Council items that fell below the "cut line ", those items for which funding was not available. At the budget retreat staff went into great detail on areas needing recurring funding such as parks, sidewalks and facilities maintenance. Jon Harshman, Director of Fleet and Facilities Services and Todd Buckingham, the recently hired Facilities Manager, spoke about City facilities and their efforts to develop a regular building maintenance program. Jon reviewed several in- progress facility repairs including several high priority projects — the Recreation Center restrooms, Fire Station #2 leaks, Pickrell Park Pool electrical work, etc. Mr. Buckingham discussed the effort to evaluate all the City's facilities and develop long term plans for maintenance and repairs. Next meeting agenda topics: Ways to increase the number of folks volunteering for open positions on Boards and Commissions and how to attract folks to volunteer service. Additionally the need to review what each Board or Commission is tasked with doing, and considering whether the role of each needs to expand, contract, or change and the need to ensure staff supports each board /commission in focusing on its mission. May 16, 2018 Reports from Boards and Commissions BOA — April 23, 2018 The Board of Adjustments did not meet in April as there were no items to consider. Planning and Zoning Commission — April 25, 2018 and May 9, 2018. At their April 25 meeting, the Commission approved a plat and associated waiver to allow septic service for a few lots in southern Schertz. At their May 9 meeting they approved a plat. At both meetings they discussed proposed changes to the Unified Development Code regarding site development standards for public water and wastewater facilities. The item was tabled by the Commission at both meetings and the Commission is going to continue to discuss the proposed changes with staff. TSAC — May 3, 2018 The Commission recommended approval of ordinances to limit parking on a section of Main Street that had previously been signed as no parking due to sight visibility issues as well as clean -up changes to speed limits on frontage roads of IH- 35 and IH -10. They also received a presentation from the Police Department on how complaints about speeding are investigated and tracked. Historic Preservation —April 26, 2018 At their April 26 meeting, the SHPC approved a Main Street grant application for the property at 528 Main Street. They reviewed the 2018 Spring Newsletter and Remembrances Special Edition Article 2018 -2. Both of these can be found on the City's website on the Historical Preservation Committee page. The Committee also discussed changes to the Landmark Property and Heritage Neighborhood Designation Program. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board — April 23, 2018 The Parks Board received updates on the activities of BVYA, SYSA and the YMCA. They also reviewed the current Parkland Dedication fee and discussed whether an adjustment to the fee was warranted. Library Board — May 7, 2018 At their April meeting, the Library Board received reports on the board's finances, library usage and the bookstore. They also discussed the upcoming 2018 -19 budget. Schertz Economic Development Corporation — May 1, 2018 During the May 1, 2018 SEDC Board Meeting, the SEDC Board heard presentations on the following: the SEDC's Monthly Financial Statements where the SEDC saw an increase of 19.9% in sales tax revenue that was due to a non - recurring capital investment; the SEDC Benchmarking and Reserve Update which compares the SEDC against our benchmark EDC's; the SEDC 20th Anniversary Update which staff is using to highlight the SEDC's efforts; and the 1st Quarter 2018 economic and Project update which provides the Board with updated information on SEDC Projects and market conditions. During the meeting the SEDC Board also approved two infrastructure related projects. The first project was with WR1 LLC who is building Wiederstein Ranch. Under the performance agreement, WRI will receive a reimbursement of up to $834,487.50 for water and wastewater improvements for their development. The SEDC will pay the money to Will LLC once the City and SEDC have received actual ad valorem and sales tax revenue from their development. WRI LLC has up to January 1, 2022 to earn the reimbursement. The second infrastructure project that the SEDC approved was with Schertz 312 who is purchasing 312 acres in northwest Schertz. Under the performance agreement, WRI will receive a reimbursement of up to $4 million for water, wastewater, roadway and sidewalk improvements. Additionally, Schertz 312 will be required to reserve a development ready site for a future million square foot user. Schertz 312 will have one year to construct the improvements and receive the reimbursement. Committee of Committees Advisory Board Summary CCAB Notes 05/16/18: Mr. James gave the City Manager update. He spoke about the Main Street Input Meeting on April 9 and mentioned staff would be providing a written update to Council in the next couple of weeks. The goal of the meeting was to get feedback from the community stakeholders and provide Council input that the City is on the right track with this project and that this is the direction /vision it is going. He also shared that Council has been meeting in closed sessions to discuss the City Manager search and that the next step of the process will be posting for the position. The committee then discussed the topic of roles of the city boards and commissions. Some boards have a defined role and are a function of overseeing the entity (EDC or TIRZ board, for example). There are other boards that are created under state law and their role is defined by the state (Animal Service Advisory Committee, Board of Adjustment or Planning and Zoning Commission). What distinguishes these boards is that they have core duties and when they meet, there is a particular role they fill. Some of the other boards the City has by choice (TSAC, Library Advisory Board, and CCAB, for example). A challenge that faces these boards /commissions is being able to clearly define the intent of the board from when it was created and evaluating if it still relevant as time goes by. CCAB members discussed looking at their by -laws and clearly defining what their role is as a board, where they can add value and what the goals or topics are for their meetings. Next meeting agenda topics: Each committee member was tasked with reviewing the CCAB by -laws and being prepared to discuss them at the June meeting.