PZ 7-25-2018 AGENDA with associated documentsSCHERTZ PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4
SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154
City Schertz Core Values
Do the right thing
Do the best you can
Treat others the way you would want to be treated
Work together cooperatively as a team
[�A0MCIZ4] t1 7N
2. HEARING OF RESIDENTS
This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker's
register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not
on the agenda shall be limited to statements of 'specifzc factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in
response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion
of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Minutes for the January 10, 2018 and July 11, 2018 regular meetings
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public
hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant's request, and any
other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and
may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act
upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.
A. ZC2018 -004
Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on an amendment of Part III, Schertz
Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 8 Special Uses and General
Regulations, Subsection 21.8.2 Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures
5. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda
B. Announcements by Commissioners.
• City and community events attended and to be attended
• Continuing education events attended and to be attended
C. Announcements by City Staff.
• City and community events attended and to be attended.
• Monthly Financial Report (June) with administratively approved plats
Planning & Zoning July 25, 2018 Page 1 of 2
NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: There were no new site plan applications submitted
to the Planning and Community Development Department between July 6, 2018 and July 20,
2018.
6. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING
CERTIFICATION
I, Emily Grobe, Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards
on this the 20" day of July, 2018 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted
in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code.
F414 Gvo�rPi
Emily Grobe, Planner
I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was
removed from the official bulletin board on day of 12018. title:
This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special
assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619 -1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting.
The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this
meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act.
Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and presence of any subject in any
Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the
governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the
meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has
been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is
conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.
Planning & Zoning July 25, 2018 Page 2 of 2
PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES
January 10, 2018
The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on January 10, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the
Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Michael Dahle, Chairman
Richard Brand
Glen Outlaw
Gordon Rae
Ken Greenwald
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Ernie Evans, Vice Chairman
1. CALL TO
Mr. Dahle called the
2. HEARIN
ENTS:
Ted Duigon - 1112 Antler Dr. —
associated with Agenda jItem 4 -A,
CITY STAFF
Brian James, Executive Director
Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Del.
Tiffany Danhof, Executive Administrative Assistant
Bryce Cox, Senior Planner
Emily Grobe, Planner
Daniel Santee, City Attorney
Beck
Engineering Inc`.
e Marie Sharp
,..
d concerns regarding drainage and traffic issues
ly water running down Antler Drive, and concerns
Bill Sommers -1016 Antler Dr.- Expressed concerns with drainage /flooding associated with
Agenda Item 4 -A. Mr. Sommers commented about how the rezone could be spot zoning, and
that he has seen a significant amount of changes along FM 3009.
Mary Hammond - 1213. Fawn Dr. — Provided comments related to Agenda Item 4 -A. Read a
letter for a resident at 1208 Fawn Dr. that was not able to come to the meeting. The letter
indicated concerns with traffic associated with the proposed project, building height, fencing,
lighting, and runoff that could be created by the project. Ms. Hammond indicated she had
similar concerns to what was stated in the letter and provided photographs and commented on
potential flooding concerns.
Barbara Mansfield Gonzales - 101.2 Antler Dr. — Provided comments related to Agenda Item
4 -A. Expressed concerns about traffic associated with the proposed project. Expressed a desire
for less intense operations for the site.
Sonya and David Jenkins - 1013 Antler Dr. — Provided comments related to Agenda Item 4 -A.
Expressed concerns about increased traffic associated with the proposed project.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 1 of 6
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Minutes for the December 13, 2017 regular meeting
Mr. Dahle indicated there are some typos in the minutes on misspelling his name in two sections,
4C and 41), that need to be corrected.
Mr. Outlaw motioned to approve the consent agenda item with corrections to be made to the
minutes. Mr. Greenwald seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0, motion carried.
4. PUBLIC HEARING:
A. ZC2017 -016
Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a proposal to
rezone approximately 2 acres of land from Single - Family Residential District (R -1) to
Neighborhood Services District (NS) located southeast of the intersection of Fawn Drive and
FM 3009.
Ms. Grobe gave a presentation to the commissioners regarding a request to consider and make
a recommendation to City Council on a proposal to rezone approximately 2 acres of land from
Single - Family Residential District (R -1) to Neighborhood Services District (NS). Ms. Grobe
described the project site conditions,,
Ms. Grobe also summarized the Corf
designation of the site and surroundii
presentation staff received 16 revon
200 -fc
propo;
thus it
family
also
to the site
most an)t
respc
Le City
quarter
the
>unding properties and zoning of adjacent properties.
ensive Land Use Plan, Future Land Use Map and
operties. Ms. Grobe indicated at the time of the
i opposition, of which 5 opposed were within the
received that expressed being in -favor of the
I opposition for over 20% of the surrounding area,
approval for the zone change to be approved by City
properties are currently zoned R -1. The
Land Use Plan designation of the property and surrounding properties is
sidential. Ms. Grobe stated that the proposed rezone is not the most
ing district and described concerns with the proposed Neighborhood Services
Berns with a commercial business taking access off Fawn Drive. Ms. Grobe
that the subject site, should it be zoned Neighborhood Services, would be
ride screening and buffering from the existing residential uses that are adjacent
Grobe commented that staff feels Neighborhood Services District is not the
e zoning for this property. Staff recommended denial of the proposed rezoning.
Mark Hill, Ford Engineering, requested that the Commission table Agenda Item 4 -A until
February 14, 2018 . to allow more time to notify staff and the public on uses proposed for the
property.
Mr. Dahle opened the Public Hearing at 7:20 P.M.
Tim Morgan - 1116 Fawn Dr. — Expressed concerns with drainage, access from FM3009, noise,
and traffic issues.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 2 of 6
Bill Sommers -1016 Antler Dr. — Had questions regarding the request to table Agenda Item 4-
A, and requested clarification on what happens if the Commissioners table the item.
Steven Phillips- 1120 Fawn Dr. — Expressed concern with existing traffic issues and additional
traffic that could be generated with the proposed project.
Frank Morales - 1109 Antler Dr. — Expressed concerns with traffic issues, neighbors safety, and
parking along roadways.
Richard Cervantes — 1016 Fawn Dr. — Concerned on changing the dramatics of the
neighborhood.
Brian Beck —1004 Antler Dr. — In favor for the rezoning and is the owner of the subject property.
Mr. Beck explained the reasoning for requesting for the rezoning for the purpose of establishing
an office and /or professional building. He indicated that it is not his intent to establish a more
intense use at the site. Mr. Beck indicated that it is not his intent to establish a high traffic
generating use.
Barbra Penaloza - 920 Fawn Dr. Indicated she and some of the neighbors needed more
clarification on the sianaae4on the nronosed'nroaerty.
Jennifer Graves- 913 Fawn Dr. — Concerned with drainage issues and having a commercial
property so close to a residential area.
Mr. Dahle closed the public hearing at 7:
The Commissioners and Staff had a discussion regarding granting the request on tabling the
Agenda 4 -A, and the requirements to proceed with tabling the item.
Mr. Outlaw motioned to grant the request to table the item, ZC201.7 -01.6, to February 28, 2018,
to include republication of a public hearing notice and conduct a public hearing at the next
meeting. Mr. Greenwald seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0, motion carried.
B. ZC2017 -020
Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a proposal to
zone approximately 7 acres of land to Single- Family Residential District -1 (R -1) located
approximately 3000 feet southeast of the intersection of Homestead Parkway and Somervell
Mr. Cox gave a presentation to the commissioners regarding a recommendation to City Council
on a proposal to zone approximately 7 acres of land to Single- Family Residential District (R -1).
Mr. Cox described the general location, current zoning of surrounding properties, and the
compressive land use plan designation as Single Family. Mr. Cox explained that the zoning is
a City initiated zone change as a result of bringing the land into the City limit with the boundary
adjustment between the City of Schertz and City of Cibolo. The City limit lines are being
adjusted to align with the right of way. Staff recommended approval of the proposed zoning to
Single - Family Residential District (R -1).
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 3 of 6
Mr. Dahle opened the Public Hearing at 7:48 P.M.
Lee Novikoff- 390 Scenic Hill Ln. — Requested clarification on the zone case so that he has a
good understanding of what is occurring.
Mr. Dahle closed the public hearing at 7:49 P.M.
Mr. Cox responded to Mr. Novikoff's request for more information by providing a brief
summary about the Homestead subdivision and previous activities that occurred related to the
Homestead development. Mr. Cox explained why the R -1 zone district is proposed by the City
for the assigned zoning of the new land being added into the City's corporate limits.
Mr. Braud motioned to forward a recommendation of approval of ZC2017 -020 to City Council.
Mr. Rae seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0, motion carried.
5. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION:
A. WA2017 -009 On -site Sewage Facility associated with PC2017 -052
Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver regarding on -site sewage facilities for
Lot 1 of the Sharp Subdivision, an approximately '1 acre tract of land located at 2233 Den -Ott
Hill, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County.
Mr. Cox gave a presentation to the commissioners regarding a request for approval of a waiver
for on -site sewage facilities for an approximate 1 acre tract of land located at 2233 Den -Ott Hill,
City of Schertz, Guadalupe County. Mr. Cox explained the existing conditions, including
issuance of building permits in the past for the existing home at the subject site.
Mr. Dahle had a question on when the house was originally built. Mr. Cox informed the
Commission that the home was built in 2006 and was appropriately permitted. Mr. Cox
explained that around 2014, the Unified Development Code changed the requirements related
to legal lot of records and the current Code requirement for a recorded plat. Staff and the
Commission had more discussion regarding permitting on new construction and reasoning for
A2017 -009. Mr. Greenwald seconded the motion. The vote
was
B. PC2017 -052 Sharp Subdivision — Preliminary Plat
Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat for Lot 1, of the Sharp
Subdivision, an approximately 1 acre tract of land located at 2233 Den -Ott Hill, City of Schertz,
Guadalupe County
Mr. Cox gave a presentation to the Commission regarding a request for approval of a preliminary
plat for Lot 1, of the Sharp Subdivision, an approximately 1 acre tract of land located at 2233
Den -Ott Hill, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County. Mr. Cox discussed the existing access
constraints of the property and indicated that due to the existing home not currently having two
points of access, a waiver to access is requested as part of the plat. Staff recommended approval .
of the plat with the access waiver.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 4 of 6
Mr. Greenwald motioned to approve PC2017 -052. Mr. Rae seconded the motion. The vote was
5 -0, motion carried.
6. WORKSHOPS /DISCUSSION:
A. Discussion regarding a proposed Unified Development Code update for Tree Preservation /
Mitigation /Exempted Trees
Mr. Cox suggested that the Commission open the item for public hearing so that the
workshop /discussion could be conducted as part of the public hearing for the proposed UDC
updates.
Mr. Dahle opened the Public Hearing at 8:05
Mr. Cox discussed the background of the Tree Preservation / Mitigation / Exempted Trees UDC
language. Mr. Cox also discussed how these codes are currently being interpreted by Planning
staff and went over the proposed UDC updates to further clarify preservation and mitigation
requirements, and introduce the ability for waivers to be requested. Mr. Cox explained that
some of the proposed changes are due to recent state law updates in regards to tree preservation
and mitigation to ensure that the City's code complies with state law and current best practices.
Mr. Cox indicated that staff will present the proposed UDC Change for review and
recommendation at the January 24th Planning and Zoning meeting.
The Commissioners and Staff had a discussion regarding updating the Tree Ordinance. Some
changes discussed during the workshop included:
• Introducing the term "class" to clarify classification of trees as protected class or
heritage class based on tree size.
• Changing how diameter at breast height is measured to be consistent with state law and
• Changing the exemptions section to allow for exemptions from the requirement to
preserve, mitigate, and permit for certain situations.
• Specifying exemption to specifically state protected class and/or heritage class trees.
• Deleted text ,regarding mitigation of all heritage trees in Subsection 21.9.9.13.4 because
it was no longer consistent with other provisions.
• Revising language so that the 25% preservation requirement only applies for Protected
Class and Heritage Class trees, and a waiver could be requested.
• Changed requirement for replacement trees from 3 inches to 2.5 inches to be consistent
with the tree planting requirements.
• Changes to language regarding oak wilt will be presented at the next meeting.
• Language regarding tree preservation credits that are applied toward new tree planting
requirements.
• Tree removal permit section was modified to remove some of the criteria for approval
since the tree removal permit is typically a function of another type of permit, such as a
clearing and grading permit.
• New waiver section that includes criteria for evaluating waiver requests.
John Sullivan- 513 Triple Crown — Inquired about whether the proposed changes to the City's
tree preservation Code section would comply with the Tree City USA if the City were to apply
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 5 of 6
for it. Mr. Sullivan asked for clarification on how adding heritage trees to the exemptions for
trees in the right -of -way. Expressed surprise that Ash Junipers are on the undesirable list, and
proposed changing the word reasonable to a stronger word.
Mr. Cox responded to the commission's comments regarding roadway classifications and why
the language regarding trees within right of ways does not specify roadway classifications.
Michelle Bammel- 6695 Tri- County Pkwy - Thanked staff for looking into proposing
amendments to the UDC requirements related to tree preservations and had a couple questions
about the length of time this proposal could take.
Mr. Dahle Closed the Public Hearing at 9:04 P
7. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda.
No commissioners spoke.
B. Announcements by Commissioners.
• City and community events attended and to be attended
• Continuing education events attended and to be attended
Mr. Dahle indicated they had their sub - committee meeting on the by -laws and will meet again
prior to the February 14, 2018 Planning & Zoning meeting. At that time Mr. Dahle should be
able to bring something, to share with the commission.
C. Announcements by City Staff.
• City and community events attended and to be attended.
• NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following site plan was submitted to the
Planning and Zoning Department between December 8, 2017 and January 5, 2018.
1. NE Corner of Trainer Hale & IH 10
Site Plan- proposed 23,319 square foot truck stop with convenience store
1 �
be presented the new submitted site plan for a proposed truck stop and gave the
5ioners a brief description of the proposed site plan.
THE REGULAR MEETING:
The meeting adjourned at 9:06 P.M.
Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
January 10, 2018
Page 6 of 6
Recording Secretary, City of Schertz
PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES
July 11, 2018
The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on July 11, 2018 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal
Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas.
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
Ernie Evans, Vice Chairman
Richard Brand
Glen Outlaw
Ken Greenwald
LaDonna Bacon
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT
Michael Dahle, Chairman
Gordon Rae
1. CALL TO ORDER:
Mr. Evans called the meeting
2. HEARING OF RESIDENT
There were no residents who
3. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Minutes for the July 27,! 201 f
Mr. Greenwald motioned to
The vote was 5 -0, motion cal
CITY STAFF
Brian James, Acting City Manger
Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Del.
Tiffany Danhof, Executive Assistant
Bryce Cox, Senior Planner
Emily Grobe, Planner
at 6:04
Consent Agenda. Mr. Outlaw seconded the motion.
B. Consider and act upon a request for approval of a final plat for the Discount Tire- TXS
11363 Subdivision, Lot 1, an approximately 1.091 acre tract of land located at 17971 IH 35,
City of Schertz, Guadalupe County.
Mr. Outlaw requested to pull to discuss the consent agenda item B.
Mr. Evans opened the discussion for Commissioners and City Staff on the consent agenda item.
Mr. Outlaw requested clarification on the final plat with regard to access points. Mrs. Wood and
Ms. Grobe identified the two shared access points on the plat.
Mr. Outlaw motioned to approve consent agenda. Mr. Braud seconded the motion. The vote
was 4 -0 -1; Commissioner Bacon abstained, motion carried.
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
July 11, 2018
Page 1 of 2
4. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda.
No Commissioners spoke.
B. Announcements by Commissioners.
• City and community events attended and to be attended
• Continuing education events attended and to be attended
No Commissioners spoke.
C. Announcements by City Staff.
• City and community events
• June 20, 2018 Committee of
• NEW SITE PLAN APPLIi
submitted to the Planning an
23, 2018 and July 6, 2018.
Mrs. Wood indicated
5. ADJOURNMENT OF THI
The meetina_adiourned at 6:1
Minutes
Planning and Zoning Commission
July 11, 2018
Page 2 of 2
nittee Advisory Board Meeting Summary
ONS: There were no new site plan applications
nmunity Development Department between June
last day will be this Friday July 13, 2018.
Recording Secretary, City of Schertz
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
PREPARED BY: Emily Grobe, Planner
CASE: ZC2018 -004 — UDC Amendment to Article 8 Section 21.8.2 to remove subsections
relating to accessory buildings and structures
SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on an amendment
of Part III, Schertz Codes of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to
Article 8 Special Uses and General Regulations, Subsection 21.8.2 Accessory
Buildings, Uses and Structures
At the July 10, 2018 Regular City Council Meeting the Planning Division and Fire Department gave a
presentation regarding building separation and setbacks in relation to accessory structures.
The presentation included the history of the UDC requirement, and staff's interpretation of the code
language and reasoning for the separation. After the presentation, City Council members and staff had a
discussion on the requirements for separation. Based on the commentary that was provided by the City
Council, which can be seen on the City Council video for the July 10, 2018 meeting starting at
approximately 1 hour, 13 minutes into the meeting video, staff was given the directive to bring forward a
UDC amendment to eliminate the separation distance requirements from the UDC in order to provide for
more flexibility for the residents of Schertz.
On June 25, 2018 the Board of Adjustment (BOA) heard four cases, submitted by residents, within the
Fairways of Scenic Hills that had installed an accessory structure, specifically a residential shed adjacent to
their homes in the side yards that is in violation of the three feet (3') common property line setback and ten
feet (10') building separation requirements in the Unified Development Code (UDC). The Board of
Adjustment denied all four cases. Since the four variances cases were heard, the City has been notified of
13 properties within the Northcliffe Golf Course area, with sheds that are in violation of the separation
requirement. On June 26, 2018 the Acting City Manager sent an email notifying City Council of the results
of the BOA meeting and explaining the potential for resident frustration on the matter. Councilman Davis
requested a discussion on the setback /separation requirement at the July 10, 2018 Regular City Council
Meeting.
The current UDC, Article 8, Section 21.8.2.C. & D. Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, states that
accessory structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and shall be located no
closer than ten feet (10') from the main building. This code requirement pre -dates the adoption of the City's
first UDC in 1996. The same separation requirements have been in place since the adoption of the 1974
Zoning Ordinance. Which stated: "Accessory buildings as permitted herein may be allowed in required side
yards, provided, however that no accessory building may be closer than ten feet (10') to any main building
on the same lot, nor closer than three feet (3') to a common property line." This requirement has remained
in effect, with the same general language since the zoning ordinance was adopted in 1974. It is Staff's
interpretation that this requirement was originally adopted by the City to address life safety concerns related
to fire. The 10' separation between a single family home and a shed is a local code and is not a
requirement in the 2012 International Fire Code or the 2012 International Residential Code which the City
currently operates under as well.
It is the opinion of the Fire Department that the separation requirements are in place due to life safety
concerns based on the proximity of accessory structures to property lines and main structures. Specifically,
the requirements are in place in order to protect, promote, improve and provide for the public health, safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City. The Fire Department's position is that the required
separation distance allows for increased operational ability; safety of first responders; safety for adjacent
residents and safety of the resident installing the accessory structure adjacent to their own home.
In general, setback requirements are also in place for aesthetic purposes. Typical residential lot setbacks
provide for a more open, inviting atmosphere for a neighborhood. The separation distance for accessory
buildings to the main structure is for very similar reasons, to encourage that sense of space and openness
for both the adjacent neighbor and the community as a whole. The Planning & Community Development
Department is uncomfortable removing all of the separation regulations. Both the Inspection and Planning
staff feel that the 3' foot setback from the common property line allows for an open unobstructed area for
stormwater drainage between properties, access for fire personnel, as well as helps maintain the aesthetic
integrity of the neighborhood.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Fire Department staff is not comfortable with the proposed UDC amendment to eliminate the separation
requirements due to the higher level of risk that would be caused by the change.
Planning & Community Development Department staff is not comfortable eliminating all separation and
setback requirements associated with accessory structures. Staff feels that the three foot (3') building
setback from the common property line allows for an open unobstructed area for stormwater drainage
between properties, access for fire personnel, as well as helps maintain the aesthetic integrity of the
neighborhood, which should be maintained.
Per the request of the City Council, City staff is bringing the UDC amendment to the Planning & Zoning
Commission for review and recommendation. Staff encourages the Planning & Zoning Commission to
review the City Council meeting video prior to the meeting (the meeting information is provided above).
COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION:
The Planning and Zoning Commission in making a recommendation to City Council on the proposed
Unified Development Code Amendments. In considering action on a UDC Amendment, the Commission
should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.4.7 D.
Attachment:
Proposed UDC Amendments Based on City Council Discussion
City Staff Proposed UDC Amendment
Proposed UDC Amendments Based on City Council Discussion:
A. No accessory building, use or structure shall be permitted without a primary use or structure.
B. Accessory buildings, uses and structures as permitted herein shall comply with the maximum impervious
coverage restrictions contained in zoning regulations, and the number of accessory uses /structures on lots
of less than' /2 acre is limited to a maximum of three (3).
may-notb&4oGated4thin-an-easement,-
D.. ory- 4d se -or-st -t�ir - -c _th ett.4_ g.
EL C. No detached accessory building, use or structure shall be allowed in the front yard.
F D. Attached accessory buildings, uses or structures shall comply with the front, side and rear setbacks
and height restrictions established for the primary structure and /or this section.
D. The wall height of the accessory building, use or structure shall be limited to not more than eight feet
(8') and total accessory building, use or structure height shall not exceed fifteen feet (15'). This is only
applicable to platted subdivisions with a specific lot size e.g. eighty feet (80') by one hundred feet (100') and
is not intended to be applicable for one -owner multiple acre residence. In this instance, a variance is not
required and the total accessory building, use or structure height cannot exceed thirty -five feet (36).
H F. Accessory buildings, uses or structures that are accessory to a principal residential use on the same
lot shall require administrative Site Plan approval prior to building permit issuance.
t. T info °r--se r-at' _ t .e M al roeturo -and dot ;red :use buitd+ng r:. o roct
J G. The minimum separation between the main building and an in- ground or above - ground pool, spa, hot
tub, playhouse, sauna or gazebo which does not exceed one story in height may be less than ten feet (10')
if the accessory building, use or structure is contiguous with or an integral part of the main building, and /or
the accessory building, use or structure is engineered by a professional engineer to ensure the integrity of
the existing (main building) foundation.
1. Such plans indicating the design for any such structure shall be submitted to the Building
Inspector for review in connection with the issuance of a building permit; and
2. Setback distances for in- ground or aboveground pools, spas, hot tubs and saunas shall be
measured to the outside edge of the beam (structural edge) of the pool, spa, etc.
H. Detached equipment and appliances in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be located
immediately adjacent to the principal building.
L 1. Detached accessory buildings, uses or structures in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be
constructed of the same exterior materials as required in Article 9, Site Design Standards, and shall not be
located in a manner that decreases the minimum number of parking spaces required.
J. Accessory buildings, uses or structures located in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be
located at the rear of the principal building and property and shall not occupy designated parking spaces.
K. Automatic teller machine (ATM) drive -thru structures are not authorized unless the associated bank
occupies a space on the same property and has a valid Certificate of Occupancy.
City Staff Proposed UDC Amendments:
A. No accessory building, use or structure shall be permitted without a primary use or structure.
B. Accessory buildings, uses and structures as permitted herein shall comply with the maximum impervious
coverage restrictions contained in zoning regulations, and the number of accessory uses /structures on lots
of less than' /2 acre is limited to a maximum of three (3).
C. Accessory buildings, uses or structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and
may not be located within an easement.
.. ;o y. b i ,
a .F qtr e. ne . o ten-feet-(44Y)..to4he-4-pai n-bu-�ldingv
Idi
EL D. No detached accessory building, use or structure shall be allowed in the front yard.
E. Attached accessory buildings, uses or structures shall comply with the front, side and rear setbacks
and height restrictions established for the primary structure and /or this section.
F. The wall height of the accessory building, use or structure shall be limited to not more than eight feet
(8') and total accessory building, use or structure height shall not exceed fifteen feet (15'). This is only
applicable to platted subdivisions with a specific lot size e.g. eighty feet (80') by one hundred feet (100') and
is not intended to be applicable for one -owner multiple acre residence. In this instance, a variance is not
required and the total accessory building, use or structure height cannot exceed thirty -five feet (35').
C. Accessory buildings, uses or structures that are accessory to a principal residential use on the same
lot shall require administrative Site Plan approval prior to building permit issuance.
t. The. . in R+m-- o r-at' t .e i roc ur aid d h a d o , .F qtr
H. The minimum separation between the main building and an in- ground or above - ground pool, spa, hot
tub, playhouse, sauna or gazebo which does not exceed one story in height may be less than ten feet (10')
if the accessory building, use or structure is contiguous with or an integral part of the main building, and /or
the accessory building, use or structure is engineered by a professional engineer to ensure the integrity of
the existing (main building) foundation.
1. Such plans indicating the design for any such structure shall be submitted to the Building
Inspector for review in connection with the issuance of a building permit; and
2. Setback distances for in- ground or aboveground pools, spas, hot tubs and saunas shall be
measured to the outside edge of the beam (structural edge) of the pool, spa, etc.
L Detached equipment and appliances in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be located
immediately adjacent to the principal building.
J. Detached accessory buildings, uses or structures in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be
constructed of the same exterior materials as required in Article 9, Site Design Standards, and shall not be
located in a manner that decreases the minimum number of parking spaces required.
M K. Accessory buildings, uses or structures located in commercial and manufacturing districts shall be
located at the rear of the principal building and property and shall not occupy designated parking spaces.
F. Automatic teller machine (ATM) drive -thru structures are not authorized unless the associated bank
occupies a space on the same property and has a valid Certificate of Occupancy.
M. Accessory buildings, uses, and structures shall conform to applicable provisions of the Bullding Code
and Fire Code.
A #. ( il Kqjq a 04 -f 0=9 i
Month: June 2018
Department: Planning & Community Development
Division: Planning and Zoning
Department Head: Lesa Wood
Prepared By: Brvce Cox
Plats
$10,500
$39,750
$62,000
Site Plans & Master Plans
$1,500
$34,000
$43,500
BOA Variance and Appeals
$778
$3,278
$5,000
Specific Use/Zone Change
$0
$18,950
$14,300
Other (Zoning Verification Letters, Plat Waivers, etc.)
$150
$1,200
$1,200
Totals
$12,928
$97,178
$126,000
Plats - Received
5
24
39
Homestead Unit 7 - Preliminary Plat
Homestead Unit 10 - Preliminary Plat
Lizcano Estates - Preliminary Plat
Guastafierro Subdivision - Preliminary Plat
UFP Sechertz - Preliminary Plat
Site Plans/ Master Development Plans - Received
1
30
29
Schertz 3009 Subdivision 11 - Site Plan (233 FM 3009)
BOA Variance and Appeals - Received
41
51
6
3777 Pebble Beach - Accessory Structure
3761 Pebble Beach - Accesso!y Structure
3788 Pebble Beach - Accessory Structure
3717 Columbia Drive - Accessory Structure
Specific Use/Zone Change - Received
1
01
101
101