Loading...
09-11-2018 Agenda with backupMEETING AGENDA City Council SPECIAL JOINT WORKSHOP MEETING WITH COUNCIL AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL SEPTEMBER 11, 2018 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 City of c ertz Core Values Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you would want to be treated Work together cooperatively as a tea Call to Order Special Joint Workshop Session • Schertz City Council • Planning & Zoning Commission Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Mayor Carpenter) Workshop • Discussion regarding City requirements for sheds. (L. Wood /E. Grobe /K. Long) • Discussion regarding Unified Development Code (UDC) requirements for masonry walls and buffering. (L. Wood/ B. Cox/) • Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Land Plan and current zoning. (B. James /L. Wood /B. Cox) Adjournment - Joint Workshop Session • Schertz City Council • Planning & Zoning Commission Call to Order — Regular Session Presentation • Presentation and update from Guadalupe Regional Medical Center — Prescription Assistance Report. (D. Wait /J. Riggs) 09 -11 -2018 Council Agenda City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) • Announcements and recognitions by the Acting City Manager (B. James) • Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (M. Carpenter) Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof: Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific f `actual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of `existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of'Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Workshop • Discussion and update regarding the Schertz Animal Adoption Center. (D. Wait /M. Hansen) • Presentation and discussion regarding the FY2018 -19 Water /Wastewater rates by Dan Jackson with Willdan Financial Services. (D. Wait /J. Hooks) Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Couneilmember. 1. Minutes — Consideration and /or action regarding the approval of the minutes of the meeting of September 4, 2018. (B. Dennis) 2. Cancellation of the October 2, 2018, October 9, 2018 and November 6, 2018 City Council meetings. - Consideration and/or action cancelling the October 2, 2018 . City Council meeting due to National Night Out, cancelling the October 9, 2018 City Council meeting due to TML in Fort Worth and cancelling the November 6, 2018 City Council meeting due to the election. (Mayor /Council) 3. Resolution No. 18 -R -123 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with R. Donovan. Butter, D.O. for EMS Medical Direction. (D. Wait /J. Mabbitt) 09 -11 -2018 City Council Agenda Page - 2 - 4. Resolution No. 18 -R -125 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution approving the roof & exterior repairs and parking expansion project of facilities of the Guadalupe Appraisal District, County of Guadalupe. (B. Dennis /J. Osborne /E. Strey) Discussion and Action Items 5. Resolution No. 18 -R -127 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution updating the fee schedule for FY 201.8 -1.9. (B. James /J. Walters) 6. Ordinance No. 18 -T -32 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance adopting a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019. Final Reading (B. James /J. Walters) 7. Resolution No. 18 -R -126 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution ratifying the property tax increase reflected in the adopted budget for Fiscal Year 2018 -19. (B. James /J. Walters) 8. Ordinance No. 18 -T -33 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance approving the appraisal roll; setting the tax rate; levying and assessing general and special ad valorem taxes for the use and support of the municipal government of the City of Schertz, Texas. Final Reading (B. James /J. Walters) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Workshop • Discussion regarding the use of Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) Funds. (Item requested by Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola) (B. James /J. Walters) • Discussion and possible action regarding the minute transcription style of the official City Council meetings. (Item requested by Councilmember Kiser) (B. Dennis /D. Schmoekel) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Closed Session 9. City Council will meet in closed session under Section 551.074 of the Texas Government Code, Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager. 10. City Council will meet in closed session under Section 551.071 of the Texas Government Consultation with the City Attorney regarding pending or contemplated litigation. • EEOC Claim — Former Employee Michael Harris • Former Employee Scott Ristow vs. City of Schertz Reconvene into Regular Session 09 -11 -2018 City Council Agenda Page - 3 - 9a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 9. 10a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 10. Roll Call Vote Confirmation Requests and Announcements • Announcements by the Acting City Manager. • Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items be placed on a future City Council agenda. • Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council. Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers 11. Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR • Pending informational items. Adiournment CERTIFICATION I, BRENDA DENNIS, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 7th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 AT 3:15 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. g1t NDA DENN1,S Brenda Dennis, City Secretar I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON DAY OF 2018. Title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210 -619 -1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. 09 -11 -2018 City Council Agenda Page - 4 - Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. CK�1���K� � � � Y��:T►`7►`IC.�. Mayor Carpenter Councilmember Sca0iola — Place 5 Main Street Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions - Alternate Hal. Baldwin Scholarship Committee Schertz- Seguin Local Government Corporation — Alternate Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation - Alternate Councilmember Davis — Place 1 Councilmember Gutierrez — Place 2 Audit Committee Audit Committee Schertz Housing Authority Board Investment Advisory Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Main Street Committee - Chair Councilmember Larson — Place 3 Councilmember Edwards — Place 4 Main Street Committee — Vice Chair Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Investment Advisory Committee Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation Main. Street Committee Councilmember Kiser — Place 6 Councilmember Crawford — Place 7 Schertz Animal. Services Advisory Commission Schertz - Seguin Local Government Corporation Audit Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions TIRZ II Board 09 -11 -2018 City Council Agenda Page - 5 - Agenda: Joint Workshop CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Planning & Community Development Fire Department Workshop discussion regarding City requirements for sheds. At the July 10, 2018 City Council meeting the Planning & Community Development Department and the Fire Department presented information on UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2 Accessory Buildings, Uses, and Structures, specifically in relation to residential accessory structures or sheds. From that presentation staff was given the directive to review the code language and evaluate a proposed UDC amendment to allow increased flexibility. Since the July 10th City Council meeting staff has made multiple presentations and had discussions with the Planning & Zoning Commission on the Commissions desired UDC Amendments. Through those discussions staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission have created the following UDC amendments: • Elimination of the existing UDC Article 8 Section 21.8.2 subsection D which states: No accessory building, use or structure may be closer than ten feet (10 ) to the main building • Addition of a new UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2 subsection D which would read as follows: An accessory building or structure may not be located less than ten feet (10 ) from the main building, unless it is located directly behind the main building, in which case the accessory building or structure may be less than ten feet (10'), including adjacent to the main building. • Elimination of the existing UDC Article 8 Section 21.8.2 subsection I which states: The minimum separation between a main structure and detached accessory building, use or structure other than a carport shall be ten feet. • Addition of a new UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2 subsection N which would read as follows: Accessory buildings, uses, and structures shall conform to applicable provisions of the Building Code and Fire Code. Through those discussions staff and the Planning & Zoning Commission have created the following Code of Ordinance amendments: • Code of Ordinances Section. 18 -61- Amendments, Building: o Sec. 18 -61- Amendments R302 - Fire - Resistant Construction: 8302.1 Exterior walls Exceptions 6. City Council Memorandum Page 2 Any accessory building (for example sheds and garages) located closer than ten feet (10') to a dwelling unit must have a minimum one hour fire resistance rating on any projection or wall parallel to the dwelling unit. One hour fire resistance rating must be in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263. • Code of Ordinances Section. 30 -82- Amendments, Fire: o Sec. 30 -82 Amendments IFC- Sec.611 Accessory Buildings Sec.61.1.1 - Any accessory building (for example sheds and garages) located closer than ten feet (10') to a dwelling unit must have a minimum one hour fire resistance rating on any projection or wall parallel to the dwelling unit. One hour fire resistance rating must be in accordance with ASTM E 1.19 or UL 263. In addition to the UDC and Code of Ordinance amendments listed above, with the direction from the Planning & Zoning Commission, reinstating permitting for all sheds is being propopsed. At the August 22, 2018 Planning & Zoning Commission meeting, staff made the recommendation to the Commission that the item be tabled in order to have a joint workshop / discussion between the City Council and the Planning & Zoning Commission. Staff made this recommendation in order for both Council and the Commission to have the ability to discuss the concerns and goals of the proposed UDC Amendment. ATTACHMENT PowerPoint Presentation Slides 1 11 UDC Amendment to Article 8, Section2:1.8.2 to remove subsections relating to accessory buildings and structures and associated Code of Ordinance Changes COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY Sec® 21.8.2, - Accessory Buildings, Uses and Structures, Ri Ei ll. Such plans indicating the design for any Such structure shall be submitted to the Building inspector for review in connection with the issuance of building pert to and 2. Setback distances for in-ground or aboveground pools, spas, hot tubs and saunas shall be measured to the outside edge of the beam (structural edge) of the pool, spa, etc. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNffY Requirements Under Review * C. Accessory buildings, uses or structures shall be set back three feet (3') from common property lines and may not be located within an easement. D. No accessory building, building. ten feet (io') to the main OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I 3 L FA- a to: Me rA I III I AAMM 9 1PLOW DI M I I IIIA Am- am UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.2: C. Accessory buildings, uses or structures shall be set back three feet (T) from common property lines and may not be located within an easement. accessory building or structure may not be located less than ten feet (10') from the main building, unless it is located directly behind the main building, in is case the accessory building or strUcture may be less than ten feet (10'), including adjacent to the main building. N. Accessory buildings, uses, and structures shall conform to applicable provisions of the Building Code and Fire Code. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY r , s =260 Aft i '�. *-- Code of Ordinances Section. 18 -61- Amendments, Building: b. Areas located in floodplain hazard areas will require permits. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIERTZI OPPORTUNITY5 =260 41 1 � Aft I a Proposed creation of the following Code of Ordinance Amendments- Code of Ordinances Section. 18-61- Amendments, Building: Sec. 18 -61- Amendments R302 - Fire-Resistant Construction: R302.1 Exterior walls Exceptions 6. Any accessory building (for example sheds and garages) located closer than ten feet (10') to a dwelling unit must have a minimum one hour fire resistance rating on any projection or wall parallel to the dwelling unit. One hour fire resistance rating must be in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263. Code of Ordinances Section. 30-82- Amendments, Fire: Sec. 30-82 Amendments IFC- Sec.611 Accessory Buildings Sec.61 1.1 - Any accessory building (for example sheds and garages) located closer than ten feet (10') to a dwelling unit must have a minimum one hour fire resistance rating on any projection or wall parallel to the dwelling unit. One hour fire resistance rating must be in accordance with ASTM E 119 or UL 263. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY Accessory Buildings allowed but must be 10' from the main building and 3' from the property line. Accessory Buildings allowed but must be 10' from the main building and 3' from the property line. A typical platted residential lot does not have adequate area for the required 10' separation. • Aft 11 Ah COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIERTZ I OPPORTUNITY Required 3' eparation from the property line. Accessory Buildings must be 10' from the main structure except in this area, in which the structure may be closer than 10' if one hour fire rated. Agenda: Joint Workshop CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Planning & Community Development Workshop and discussion regarding Unified Development Code (UDC) requirements for masonry walls and buffering Staff gave presentations at both the August 7 and August 14 City Council Meetings. During which staff presented the current requirements relating to masonry walls and buffering between non-residential/multi-family developments and residentially zoned or used property. Additionally, staff discussed the masonry wall requirement when a residential subdivision is adjacent to a primary or secondary arterial roadway. This workshop is being given due to the opportunity presented by the joint meeting of City Council and the Planning and Zoning Commission to have a discussion and share their ideas and thoughts on the masonry wall and buffering requirements. Unified Development Code Article 9 provides for the City's site design standards. Within this article are regulations for when a non-residential or multifamily development is being proposed adjacent to a residentially zoned or used property. Specifically, the non-residential or multifamily property is required to construct a screening wall that is to be of a masonry product and a minimum of eight feet (8') in height. In addition to this screening wall, the non-residential or multifamily development is required to install a minimum of twenty feet (20') wide landscape buffer adjacent to the property line of the residentially used or zoned property. This landscape buffer is to be located on the non-residential or multi-family property and is required to have a minimum of one (1) shade tree for each thirty linear feet (30') of buffer and a minimum of ten (10) shrubs for each fifty linear feet (50') of buffer. These requirements are in addition to any other landscaping, screening, or buffering requirements that may be applicable for the development of the lot. The masonry screening wall and landscape buffer requirements for non-residential and multifamily developments were put in place to help mitigate the light and sound pollution of the development to the adjacent residential property. By requiring the screening wall and landscaping the purpose is to provide a visual and audible barrier for the residential property owner from the non-residential or multifamily development. Over the last two years planning staff has received comments from residential property owners, via phone calls and public hearings, both in favor and against the screening and buffering City Council Memorandum Page 2 requirements for adjacent non - residential properties. Some of the commentary that has been provided in favor of the screening and buffering requirements have included that the screening wall provides for increased safety from the proposed non - residential development, along with increased mitigation from the noise and light that comes with non - residential development. The most prevalent commentary from the existing residential property owners against the screening and buffering requirements is in relation to the masonry wall more than the landscaping. The sentiment conveyed to staff was that the non - residential property had some existing vegetation and the adjacent residents had grown accustom to seeing the vegetation on the property, and rather than having to look at a masonry wall they would rather see a full landscape screening. With the existing requirements, City staff does not have the ability to review and approve alternative screening or buffering standards. Additionally, the UDC does not provide a provision that allows proposed alternatives to be reviewed by a Board or Commission. Planning staff has been brainstorming a concept for a proposed UDC amendment to allow staff to both evaluate and approve an alternative design standard. To institute this alternative, planning staff would draft and propose a UDC amendment that would allow non - residential and multifamily developers two options on their screening and buffering standards. The first of which would be to install the masonry wall with a lower requirement for landscaping and a reduction in the buffer width. The second option would be to not install the masonry wall, but rather plant a full landscape screening that forms a continuous barrier from the first day the business is open with an increased buffer width. This would allow for areas that a masonry wall doesn't necessarily conform to the adjacent residential aesthetics the ability to still provide buffering and screening in a more aesthetically pleasing way. Additionally planning staff feels that this requirement should only be required between non - residential or multifamily development and residentially zoned property and exclude the provision regarding residentially used property. The UDC requires the in Sec.21.9.8.0 Screening Along Arterial Roadways, the installation of an eight foot (8') tall masonry wall when the side or rear yard of a single - family residential ot abuts a primary or secondary arterial roadway (i.e. Schertz Parkway and FM 3009). This section exempts lots greater than 1 acre in size located in the Residential Agriculture (RA) zoning district. It also provides for screening alternatives that can be requested and approved with the preliminary plat by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The UDC also requires in Sec.21.1.4.3 the installation of an eight foot (8') tall masonry wall when the rear yard of any non - residential lot abuts a primary or secondary arterial roadway. It is the opinion of planning staff that this requirement should not be changed as this adds to the aesthetics of the streetscape and roadways. Staff has received many comments complementing the appearance and feel of the residential sections of the City's primary and secondary arterials. By receiving additional guidance from the City Council on this topic, staff can do a more thorough review with research on how other cities require screening and buffering from non- residential properties to residential properties. With this guidance and research, planning staff could then proceed forward with a UDC amendment to the screening and buffering requirements to allow for increased flexibility. ATTACHMENT UDC Requirements PowerPoint Presentation Slides City Council Memorandum Page 3 Applicable UDC Requirements • UDCArticle 9; Section 21.9.8.B.3 Fences Adjacent to Residential Property — Where any nonresidential or multifamily use, lot or parcel except public schools is adjacent to or separated by only a local street or alley from a lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential use, the nonresidential or multifamily use shall construct a masonry screening wall a minimum of eight feet (8') in height. The screen shall be located no closer to the street than the property line. Such screening wall shall be maintained in good condition. Any sections of this UDC or any other City ordinances, codes or regulations concerning sight obstructions of intersections shall be applicable to the screen where it is intersected by a right - of -way. Where any nonresidential or multifamily use, lot or parcel is located in such a manner so as to be at a higher elevation than an adjacent lot or parcel that is zoned for single family residential use, the required masonry screening wall shall be constructed on the higher elevation so as to mitigate the adjacent residential property from the impacts of the adjacent use. • UDC Article 9; Section 21.9.7.G Nonresidential and Multifamily Landscape Buffer Requirements — In addition to any screening requirements of section 21.9.8, a nonresidential or multifamily use adjacent to a residential use or residentially zoned property shall provide a minimum twenty foot (20') landscape buffer adjacent to the property line of the residential use or residentially zoned property. A minimum of one (1) shade tree shall be planted for each thirty linear feet (30') of landscape buffer. A minimum of ten (10) shrubs shall be planted for each fifty linear feet (50') of landscape buffer. All other areas within the landscape buffer shall be covered with grass or another solid vegetative cover approved at the time of Site Plan approval. • UDC Article 9; Section 21.9.8.B. C Screening Along Arterial Roadways 1. Requirement Criteria. a. Where subdivisions are platted so that the rear or side yards of single- family residential lots are adjacent to a principal or secondary arterial roadway as described in section 21.14.1, or are separated from a principal or secondary arterial roadway by an alley, the developer shall provide, at its sole expense, a minimum eight foot (8') tall masonry screening wall. All screening shall be adjacent to the right -of -way or property line and fully located on the private lot(s), including columns and decorative features. Any sections of this UDC or any other City ordinances, codes or regulations concerning sight obstructions of intersections shall be applicable to the screen where it is intersected by a right -of -way. b. Parcels or lots one (1) acre or greater in size located in the RA zoning district and used in conjunction with the containment of livestock or farm animals are exempt from the screening wall requirements of this section. City Council Memorandum Page 4 2. Screening Alternatives. An alternative form of screening, in -lieu of the masonry wall, may be approved by the :Planning and Zoning Commission with the Preliminary Plat application. Alternatives that may be considered include: a. a living /landscaped screen in conjunction with decorative metal (e.g., wrought iron) fence sections with masonry columns; b. a combination of berms and living /landscaped screening; c. a combination of berms, decorative masonry walls and living /landscaped screening, either with or without a decorative metal or "FenceCrete" type of fence with masonry columns; or d. some other creative screening alternative may be approved if it meets the spirit and intent of this section, if it is demonstrated to be long- lasting and generally maintenance -free, and if the Planning and Zoning Commission find it to be in the public interest to approve the alternative screening device. 3. Time required for opacity. Any required screening device shall be, or shall achieve, at least six feet (6') in height and at least ninety percent (90 %) opacity within three (3) years of initial installation /planting. 4. Maintenance Easement. A wall /screening maintenance easement at least five feet in width shall be dedicated to the home owners association on the private lot side and adjacent to the entire length of the screening wall or device for maintenance and repair of the screening wall. 5. Installation. The screening /wall /device shall be installed prior to final acceptance of the subdivision public improvements. All landscape materials, if utilized, shall be installed in accordance with section 21.9.7. Failure to properly install all components of a required screening wall or device within the prescribed time frame shall constitute a violation of this UDC, and shall authorize the Public Works Director to refuse acceptance of the subdivision public improvements. 6. Design of Walls. All masonry, wrought iron, steel or aluminum screening wall plans and details must be designed and sealed by a licensed professional engineer, and must be approved by the City. Use of chain -link, chicken -wire, hog -wire fencing, and any other material similar in appearance and quality is expressly prohibited for meeting the requirements of this section. 7. Height of Screening. The height of required screening devices, including spans between columns, shall be a minimum of six feet (6') and shall be no more than eight feet (8'). Decorative columns, pilasters, stone caps, sculptural elements, and other similar features may exceed the maximum height by up to two feet (2') for a total maximum height of ten feet (10') for these features. 8. Other Easements. Screening fences, walls and devices shall not be constructed within any portion of a utility or drainage easement unless specifically authorized by the City and by any other applicable utility provider(s). • UDC Article 14; Section 21.14.3.G Screening — A masonry screening wall a minimum of eight foot (8') in height shall be provided where the rear yard of any residential or nonresidential lot abuts a Principal or Secondary Arterial. Any masonry screening wall constructed as part of a new residential subdivision shall be constructed of a like and similar City Council Memorandum Page 5 material and color as screening walls in adjacent subdivisions to provide a consistent streetscape. Unified Development Code: Screening & Bufferin# Presentation and Discussion Current UDC Requirements UDC Article 9; Section 21.9.8.B.3 Fences Adjacent to Residential Property COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I TI 2 Current UDC Requirements UDC Article 9; Section 21.9.7.G Landscape Buffer Requirements COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY 3 Current UDC Requirements 0 UDC Article 9; Section 21.9.8.0 Screening A/ong Arterial Roadways — Where subdivisions are platted so that the rear • side yards of single- family residential lots are adjacent to a principal or secondary arterial roadway a minimum eight foot (8') tall masonry screening wall. 40 UDC Article 14; Section 21.14.3.G Screening COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY By reqUiring the screening wall and landscaping the purpose is to provide a visual and audible barrier for the residential property owner from the non-residential or multifamily development. SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY COMMUNITY SERVICE 5 COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIERTZ I OPPORTUNITY 6 standards, Alternatives to the Current UDC Requirementj City staff does not have the ability to review and approve alternative screening or buffering nor does the UDC provide a provision that allows alternatives to be reviewed by a Board or Staff has been considering a concept for a proposed UDC amendment to allow staff to both evaluate and approve an alternative design COMMUNITY SCHHERTZ I POD I 7 Alternatives to the Current UDC Requirementi To institute this alternative, planning staff would draft non-residential amendment that would allow and multifamily r options on it screening . buffering masonry r requirement r landscaping and a reduction in the bUffer width. install — Option #2- would be to not - aiasorwy wall, but rather landscape screening that forms a continuous barrier first increased business is open with an i .. areas This would allow for masonry conform residential aesthetics the ability to still provide buffering r pleasing feels Additionally plamiing staff requirement required non-residential between r multifamily development and residentially property r regarding residentially used property. COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I TI s Discussion & Questions COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIERTZ I OPPORTUNITY 9 Agenda: Joint Workshop CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Planning & Community Development Workshop and discussion regarding the Comprehensive Land Plan and current zoning This item has been prepared at the request of Mayor Carpenter Per request by the Planning and Zoning Commission, Staff gave a presentation at the March 28, 2018 . Planning and Zoning Commission meeting regarding differences in the current zoning. During the presentation staff identified multiple areas throughout the city in which the current zoning did not match the land use characteristics proposed in the Future Land Use Map. The City of Schertz's Comprehensive Land Plan is a policy document that serves as a guide for decisions relating to the physical, social, and economic growth of the City. The Comprehensive Land Plan includes goals, policies, and identifies issues in the following development related categories: Land Use, Transportation, Public Facilities, Parks and Recreation, Community Enhancement, and Growth Capacity. Comprehensive Land Plan consists of multiple parts including: • Future Land Use Plan — this exhibit identifies the land use /character areas for all properties within the City corporate limits and Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). • The Parks and Recreation Master Plan — this document was adopted to provide for and continually improve park and recreational facilities, provide trail opportunities, preserve open spaces and rehabilitate existing parks in the City. • The Schertz Sector Plan- this document was adopted as an update to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan to address the increased growth in the northern and southern regions of the City. It includes the North Sector Plan and South Sector Plan. • Master Thoroughfare Plan- this document identifies all major transportation facilities in the city and is intended to accommodate the ultimate development of the city's thoroughfare network. It is a right -of.- -way preservation document, allowing the orderly development of a network necessary to support the city's growth plans. Future thoroughfare alignments are conceptual, long -term and general in nature. The City's Unified Development Code is intended to implement the policies and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Plan. City staff uses the Comprehensive Land Use Plan as a guiding City Council Memorandum Page 2 document when evaluating development applications that involve rezone requests and discretionary items. The oldest portion of the Comprehensive Land Plan was adopted in 2002 and was intended to be a 20 year plan running through 2021. Subsequently the Sector Plan Amendment was adopted in 2013 which evaluated the northern portion of the city (east of FM 3009 and north of IH -35) and the southern portion of the city (south of FM 78 and the Cibolo Creek). The following questions are intended to set the framework for the discussion: • Are changes to the current zoning or comprehensive land plan needed? And what additional information may be needed to help make this decision? (i.e. Economic Development Analysis) • Prior to deciding if City initiated rezoning is appropriate, has there been a change in conditions that would warrant a review of the current Comprehensive Land Plan? • How much involvement and engagement do you want to have with the citizens and property owners prior to any changes? • Are current development patterns in the areas which are zoned differently than the Comprehensive Land Plan identifies detrimental to the overall goals and objectives of the City? ATTACHMENT PowerPoint :Presentation. Slides Discussion regarding the Comprehensive Land Use Plan N Current Zoning 3 • , El • , 0 ll . •' Ah 0 ai +. a Ah Ah 0 ai +. a Ah ll . •' avaq I 0 ..; - , I Ah 9 - , I Ah 10 - , I Ah HE Presentation CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 . Department: Subject: BACKGROUND Administration Guadalupe Regional Medical Center — Prescription Assistance report On March 5, 2013, City Council approved an Interlocal Agreement with Guadalupe Regional Medical Center (the Hospital) relating to a prescription access program. This program offers assistance to qualified citizens of the city that enables them to purchase prescription medication at a significantly reduced price. The provision of a prescription assistance program is a public purpose and preserves and protects these qualified citizens' health and safety. The Hospital will provide prescription medications free of charge or at a low cost to citizens who qualify for assistance under the guidelines established by each drug manufacturer and as described to the City by the Hospital. The Hospital will comply with all federal, state, county, and City laws, rules, ordinances, and regulations which may affect the agreement. A written report will be provided by the Hospital to the City Council of the City on or about March 1 and September 1 of each year. This report will document that the payments made by the City have primarily benefitted citizens of the City and will include such information as total number of resident patients served, number of prescriptions filled, retail dollar value of prescriptions, and sources of program funds. IVIZTG • ' • On The fiscal impact to the City is $5,000 annually. This is a budgeted item. The City's contribution . helps pay for the cost of administering the program. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council accept the report from the Guadalupe Regional Medical Center. ATTACHMENT Report dated March 1, 2018 through August 31, 2018 Exhibit A Report Information Guadalupe Regional Medical Center Prescription Assistance Program for Schertz Enrollees March 1, 2018 thru August 31, 2018 � 1,11:101 N a k Total number of patients served by the program '— 1038 Total number of Schertz residents served by the program 1 —2-5) Total number of prescriptions provided by the program '_ 19240 --- -- Retail dollar value of prescriptions provided by the PAP $ 7,066,967 7 12] Retail dollar value of prescriptions provided to Schertz residents by PAP 1 $ 232,0 Number of prescriptions per Schertz patient per month —3,45) Average prescription retail price (3 month supply) per Schertz patient 1 $ 1,3 --- —]Average annual retail prescription benefit per Schertz patient 18,566372 SOURCES OF PROGRAM FUNDS (ANNUAL) Schertz contribution to the program 1 $ 5,000.00 Seguin contribution to the program 1 $ 5,0 Contributions to program by individuals 1 $ 5,1 Payments by patients ($15.00/month/patient) $ 138,218700] Grants received for the program (United Way) 1 $ 5,0 Other sources of funds (identify sources) Glucose Monitor Rebates $ 1,976.22 Organization Contributions $ 545.00 Corporate Contributions $ 200.00 TOTAL REVENUE $ 161,090.54 TOTAL EXPENSES $ (345,327.96) TOTAL NET -$ (184,237.42) Agenda No. 1 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Subject: City Secretary Minutes The City Council held a Regular meeting on September 4, 2018. HHZTG • ' • On RM Staff recommends Council approve the minutes of the Regular meeting held on September 4, 2018. ATTACHMENTS Minutes of the Regular meeting of September 4, 2018. MINUTES REGULAR MEETING September 4, 2018 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on September 4, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1.400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Pro -Tem David Scagliola Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Cedric Edwards Councilmember Bert Crawford Staff Present: Executive Director Dudley Wait City Attorney Dan Santee Mayor Michael Carpenter was Absent. to Order — Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola called the Texas. (Counc Councilmember Edward; Flags of the United State Pro Tern S to Andre: SDanlev J Councilmember Mark Davis Kiser ames t to the City X retry Brenda at 6: Gonzalez opening prayer followed by the pledges of Allegiance to the National Payroll Week (M. Carpenter /Christine Bodily) read and presented the proclamation for National Payroll Week • EMS, Benjamin Potts, Paramedic • Public Affairs, Arturo Ortiz, Events Attendant — (Was not available to be introduced) • Public Works, Hector Mauldin & Trey Combs Water Serviceman I Each Department Supervisor introduced their new staff member(s) and provided a brief bio on them. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Council welcomed everyone on board. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -1- City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Assistant to the City Manager Sarah Gonzalez who provided the following announcements: Wednesday, September 5th Blood Drive 8:00 am - noon Community Center Parking Lot Saturday, September 8th Paws in the Pool, Noon to 4:00 pm Pickrell Park Pool Tuesday, September 11th City Council Meeting 6:00 pm Council Chambers Thursday, September 13th Olympia Hills Golf Course and Friday, September Ribbon Cutting 2600 East FM 1518 Join the Chamr e' rctl family zone, fireworks, and more by the Acting City Manager (B. James) recognitions by the Mayor. (M. Carpenter) No announcements were made. Hearing of Residents Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola recognized the following who spoke: 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 2 - • Ms. Michelle Womack, 2944 Mineral Springs, who provided slides /pictures of various shelter animals this past week to show the current poor conditions in the shelter. She asked that her presentation be added to the official records of this council meeting. She was alerted to concerns earlier this year in June. Complaints were in regard to poor treatment of staff, lack of cleanliness and a claim of animal dumping by the facility manager. She has submitted an open records request for which she is still waiting for a response. Animals continue to die (diseases /other medical issues) and be mistreated. She spoke of her visits to the shelter last weekend. She witnessed filth, sick and underweight animals, animals housed together when they didn't have to be and more. On Friday she requested a meeting with city management and three councilmembers. She was concerned about the conditions but also concerned about *,Q animals in particular. Mr. James listened. She wanted Council present to hear her concerns. She thanked Mr. James for following through with her request that the two' animals have vet care. He kept in touch with her all weekend long and was at the facility on Saturday trying to make improvements on the conditions and direct staff on the twci , nimals care. She checked this morning and the two animals are improving and the facility "'is, clean like it used to 'be", prior to the current manager's employment with the city. The sick cat population is now in another area where she hopes and prays they will get the care they,ned. Moving ,toward there are multiple things that must happen. A Schertz citizen needs to be placed on the Animal= Advisory Board. Senior management needs to seek guidance from other local area facilities on proper cleaning and disinfectant policies as well as operational policies. A permanent plan must be in place on handling sick animals when the facility is closed. Staff must be trained on the importance of following vet orders. The city must call for an immediate demotion or removal of the facility manager. All cats need to be tested and treated for various illnesses. Reinstate the observation and intake side of the facility to avoid introduction of illnesses and be able to observe pets with behavioral concerns. Return all vet care to the local area vets instead of pet shots. Reinstate positive relationships with local area rescue organizations that have worked with Schertz for years. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 3 - Money needs to be spent where it needs to be spent—on animal care. Time cards should be reviewed by someone outside of the facility. Review of all procedures needs to occur from April 301h forward. Stop all transfers until sick animals are treated. Transfers should be from our smaller sister cities only —they don't have big budgets —they need us. All donations to the shelter should be removed from the general fund and put in a separate fund for medical needs. Accountability of the funds need to be made public. All rooms in the facility should be open to the public. Implement a dress code for staff, especially with whoever is manning the front desk. She leaves with a few questions. 1. Why is staff now calling the facility manager when 2. If there is nothing wrong at the building why scrambling all weekend over there to get things dor 3. When did the police department have to take riven r 4. When did numbers, transfers, social media an important than providing for animals in our area treatment. Council ember Edwards asked fora point of privilege. He asked if we could have this put on the" agenda 'and have a,fitll walk through of what is going on including the intake process and the placement=l rocess as well as the removal of animals. said they had planned, to have the Police Department do an overview in October; ley will moue it up to next week. They will also cover the issues mentioned. Mr. Jeff Worhack, 2944 Mineral Springs, who stated they had originally planned this so that if Michell, got cut off during her speaking opportunity (i.e. time limit) he could continue. He thanked them for hearing her out and he thanked Mr. James for all he did this weekend. However, he did want to speak on items 8 and 9. He believes we need to keep moving forward and investing in Schertz. In northern Schertz, Wiederstein Road is a big topic. A lot of folks drive Old Wiederstein (known as Bagdad Highway) on a daily basis. He spoke of the deplorable driving conditions; he implores them to get this fixed. • Ms. Fae Simmons, 1216 Cyrus McCormick, who spoke of reading some things on social media regarding the animal shelter and she found them disturbing. She wanted to share her experience, evidently before all these things started. She adopted a cat a while back and 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 4 - she couldn't have dealt with more supportive people and the cages were spotless. She described a stray mother cat /12 kitten situation a few years back and the staff worked with her on how to catch them with a trap and providing supplemental milk for the mother cat and babies. She wound up going through this again a second time and once more the assistance was wonderful. Her concern is what she experienced 2 years ago and what she is hearing now. She offered another solution. She is a member of the Mayor's Committee of Committee's Advisory Board. She has already suggested this topic be placed on their next meeting agenda on September 19 and have the staff members of Animal Services at that meeting to describe and discuss what is going on. They need to start `fact finding' help us get it back to where it was. She suggested the advisory board get to;ethet with a council representative and the staff and the concerned citizens and start developing ,a plan. Reach out to the community and find more volunteers, work out a fund that people can donate money to be used for veterinary services. She pledged to offer to match $1 for $1 hip first $500. She believes we can move forward with this. • Ms. Maggie Titterington, The Chamber President, _,s,] had and she thanked city staffers, .Kyle Kinateder an for Tri County Roadway. She also thanked staffers and Bryce Cox for assisting in the opening of Simr years in the making. The monthly Chai l 'Lunche the topic will be Successful. Companies Develop S,ti CEO Craig Krause will speak. He will then retu education class called' `Creating your owl Solutions. $20) and will be field at the Civic Center. about a public open house EDC mifer .Kolbe for putting it together R, James, Lesa Wood, Gil Durant al Estate. This has been five vill be' held on September 18 and ,sful People. Direct Development 'o days later to teach a business is free to members (non- members • Ms. Brenda Dennis, speaking for Ms. Dawn Mitchell (not able to attend tonight), 3805 Whitaker, who' asked that her concerns be put on public record regarding the current inadequate conditions at the Animal Shelter. Her understanding is that the facilities are not kept in a sanitary condition and many of the animals are injured or sick and in need of medical care. She has not witnessed this herself but has received photos and information from other citizens. She understands management has changed at the facility and she would like to know what the current conditions are and why it is that way. She adopted a dog in 2014 and would like to know that any other future animals that are adopted by folks are healthy and the community's resources are being used efficiently and wisely. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 5 - • Mr. Grumpy Azzoz, 528 Wayward Pass, who said he loves animals and he stated if you remember, that facility was infested with mold. He has pictures and you all know that and really, up to today, it is still not fixed. But what he really wanted to say is he has been in the city since 1980 -81. He fell in love with the city and moved here. He met a lot of people, attended a lot of functions, and now they decided this coming week to say their goodbyes to the City of Schertz and they are moving to New Braunfels (ETJ). While living here, he was alw truthful about anything he said. He encouraged council to `get united' again. You cannot be divided. Your number one priority is to take care of the residents, the city and city staff. No one should have a special agenda. No one is better than their colleagues. 'Fix, the issues; it is okay to vote your conscious. It is not a job, it is a public serviceiNou are ,elected public official. JFK said a lot of important things, but the most importar. not what your country can do for you, but wh you can the city does for you, it is what you do for the,, city. If occurs, you will continue to have people wanting t tnov He understands their job is tough— hying to please e please everyone. He wants to thank everyone for speakir He wished everyone his best and thanked`eveyone once Consent Agenda Items Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliol4 read the:following. one that sticks ih his head is `It is for your country.' It is not what *gs are maintained and growth here because of the services. ryone. Don't do that —you can't bout,their concerns, issues, etc. The following was read into record. ORDINANCE NO. 18 -M -30 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SCHERTZ AUTHORIZING AND AMENDING CITY COUNCIL RULES OF CONDUCT AND PROCEDURE; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 6 - Ordinance No. 18 -M -31 - Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending the City Council Code of Ethics related to the procedure for conducting inquiries. Final Reading (B. Dennis /Mayor- Council) The following was read into record. ORDINANCE NO. 18 -M -31 The following was read into RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -121 was red into record. RESOLUTION NO. 18-R -122 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Crawford who asked that items 4 and 7 be removed for short discussion. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who moved seconded by Councilmember Gutierrez to approve consent items 1 -3, 5 & 6. The vote was unanimous 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 7 - with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion Passed. Discussion and Action Items 4. Resolution No. 18 -R -108 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing a contract with Armstrong Vaughn & Associates for auditing services. (B. James /J. Walters) The following was read into record. RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R- A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A CONTRACT WITH ARMSTRONG VAUGHN & ASSOCIATES FOR AUDITING SERVICES. Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola recognized Council n tuber, Crawford who had asked that this item be pulled from consent. Councilmember Crawford requested Mr. Walters go over the process we are going to go through to select another accounting firm during the next year. Mr. Walters briefly explained the process for selecting firm for providing the city auditing services which was vetted "an c recommended thrdugh the Auditing Committee. We have been with the current firm for more thin ten years. The committee recommends staying with the current firm for one more year (rather than the standard 3 years) and go back out and request dditional proposals .with the intent to change auditing firms. To ensure that ha pens, dun g; our procurement process we can actually bar Armstrong Vaughn and Associates specifically to exclude them from applying again for this next round. Mayor ProJ m Scagliola recognized Councilmember Gutierrez who moved seconded by Con, ncilmember'Davis to approve Resolution No. 1.8 -R -108. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Edwards, Kiser, and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion Passed. 7. Ordinance No. 18- S -29'— Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance regarding a request of a Specific Use Permit and associated conceptual site plan to allow a Convenience, Store with Gas Pumps on an approximate 0.93 -acre site. The property is more specifically described as Lot 6, Block 2 of the Tri- County Business & Industrial Park Unit IA Subdivision; City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas; located at 17501 IH 35. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood /E. Grobe) The following was read into record. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 8 - ORDINANCE NO. 18 -S -29 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS TO APPROVE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR OPERATION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS AT 1750111135, SCHERTZ, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Crawford who had asked that this item be pulled from consent. Councilmember Crawford would life to ask staff to work with Council to an extent in the future about looking at the UDC,'procedures, and rules we have for density of land use, so we don't have six gas stations (restaurants, or whatever) in one corner. He just feels we need to have a discussion about the use of our land. Councilmember Edwards took a few minutes to sho `,a few pictures including some drainage issues and dumpster dumping problems. He just wanted to remind everyone he did suggest having the dumpsters relocated at the applicants proposed site. He prefers they put the dumpsters on the back side of their proposed facility. May Pro -Tem Sca hula stated, then there are two issues, one is the standing water and lhe,other is the dumpster location. The applicant representative Karen, Mitchell came forward and acknowledged the drainage problem and stated they must follow the requirements cif, TxDOT. They will not make matters worse in that location. They will d6 the best they can within TxDOT requirements. Ctruncil engaged in :more discussion regarding the number of business types allowed in the city in that council doesn't regulate that. Acting City Manager Brian James said the zoning of areas in the city regulates that. In this case the zoning stipulates they need to ask for a specific ue permit and-the ordinance lays out the criteria and council can say yes or no to it. In his time here, staff has left the decision of the number and types of businesses to the market. If they feel they can compete, let them compete. Staff has not gotten the impression council wanted 'them to look at do we have too much of a certain type of business in the city? Councilmember Kiser asked who would be responsible if someone dumped some large items by the dumpster. Answer was the business, 7- Eleven. Councilmember Crawford stated he takes a little bit of exception to what Mr. James says. He spent six years on the Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z). He spoke of an occasion where the board declined an application for a special use permit for a gas station similar to 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 9 - this item. However, he feels six gas stations in one area is a bit high. He doesn't know what else can be there. He just wanted to point out that P &Z has declined a gas station before. Councilmember Edwards had staff put up a picture of a dumpster with discarded furniture sitting around it and just wanted to point out that unfortunately this often happens to businesses that have dumpsters onsite. He is all for economic development but illegal dumping happens. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Larson who moved seconded by Councilmember Gutierrez to approve Ordinance No. 18 -S -29 final: reading. The vote was 6- 1 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards and Kiser voting for and Councilmember Crawford voting, no. Motion Passed. 8. Public Hearing on Proposed Budget for FY 2 consideration and/or action regarding the adopti, PH required public hearing) (B. James /J. Walters) Ordinance No. 18 -T -32 — Consideration and/or proposed FY 2018 -19 Budget. First Reading (B. The following was read into t'1 — Conduct _a public hearing and to FY 2018 =19 Budget. (Second an Ordinance on the 8 -T -32 UDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019, IN OF THE CITY OF SCTERTZ, TEXAS; E :BUDGET; PROVIDING THAT THIS OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING OVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. • Provide clarity when making important organizational decisions; and • Define our true north, guiding us toward the right path Adoption and implementation of these philosophies by City Staff, City Council and community stakeholders will facilitate critical alignment that is necessary for organizational success. City of Schertz 2019 Strategic Plan: 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -10 - 100 best place to live st ?) e all aspire to live e wan to go ?) the premier city in the region in quality of life and sustainable economic prosperity. Goals (How are we going to get there ?) Quality of Life 2. Sustainable Economic Prosperity 3. Effective Land Use 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 11 - 4. Regional Collaboration and Intergovernmental Cooperation How did we think we would get there? City of Schertz Strategic Plan Meetings - 2009 & 2011 Strengths Recreation Opportunities Quality of Life Opportunities Acquisition of additional parkland Indoor soccer Dog park Drainage area for development of recreational It is about finding the appropriate balance. Core Services Policy Values • Safe Community • Essential Services • Quality of Life Policy Values • High Quality of Life • Attractive Community • Frnnnmi.r FnainP Pnliry V • Fi ity o M Economic Development Corporate Website Schertz, Texas f,Strategieally located on Interstate 10 and Interstate 35 corridors just outside San Antonio at the northeast gateway to Austin, the City of Schertz is a premier Texas community. The City actively seeks to create a welcoming and exciting place to conduct business and call home. Where is our reputation now? — San Antonio Magazine August 2017 . — Top 1.0 Neighborhoods we love. Schertz was a vibrant community in the late 1800s before a railroad arrived, bringing more people and commerce. With the development of Randolph Air Force Base, Schertz and surrounding suburbs northeast of San Antonio became strong independent towns. Now, more than 35,000 people live in the 32- square -mile city. Play / Schertz has many homegrown events, such as SchertzFest, a celebration in September that includes a carnival and BBQ cook -off. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes page - 12 - Schertz is also home to the Buffalo Valley Youth Association, a large, regional soccer complex. Northcliffe Golf Club, an affordable links -style course, is a hidden gem of sorts for local golfers. Explore / Schertz has more than 20 public park locations, totaling 370 -plus acres, including a skate park and a dog park. Pickrell Park's public pool was recently improved and unveiled a new mural. Crescent Bend Nature Park contains dozens of species of native fauna and flora. What have our residents told us? 2016 Community Survey Report The three Parks and Recreation services that responder emphasis over the next two years include • Walking and biking trails in the City • Maintenance and appearance of City parks, and • Number of City parks 1. Location—, 71%'I` 2. Quality of Life — 3. It's a balance quality of life and affordability? receive the most for the City when ETC services. $25,000 to do the Council on,* Go Meetings • Generally,, tare residents attend these than normal Council meetings • The City has included updates of parks programs at the Council on the Go meetings What has the feedback been from residents? Because we value communicating with our residents we have spent $6,000 videotaping these meetings each year. Community Budget Meetings • Although not well attended, these meetings provide a forum for those residents who are highly engaged to discuss the budget and offer their views. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -13 - • What percentage of attendees generally supported the proposed tax increase vs. not increasing taxes? Given the staff time and cost involved do we want to continue to solicit input from our residents on the budget beyond the minimum required by State Law? Mr. James showed proposed cuts that could be made which included: 2 Shred Days per year $10,000 • Collected over 9,000 gallons of paper to be shredded at i • While some residents own a shredder, others clearly decades worth of sensitive personal papers • Why not reduce the level of service (1 time per year) vs. e events this past year do not as they brought in • Should we consider this as part of a larger discussion of s trash picked up per week, increased emphasis on recycling, select their own trash service, brush chipping, etc.? Close 1 Outdoor Pool $150,000 • For the 62 days both pool: • Wendy Swan Pool has fev • Would residents of the Community Center? • Once we close it, would it • Replace with a splashpad staff doing Qradin* rencl mm altogether? ,aste - # of times in2 businesses to were open this summer there were 12,783 attendees to sa for M &O. to close Wendv Swan Pool or the North icy —the "'SMALL" one being built in UC with about $6 00,000 + $25,000 (fencing and shade -y are planning for a larger $1.5 million one in Make Schertz Alcgcizine Digital $115,000 • Currently print 180,000 per year and are proposing it increase to 192,000 • Digital reads are growing — 342 to 461 (2016 to 2018) as has average time spent reading — 2:43 minutes to 3:20 minutes. Digital Parks guide has had 1,760 views • Biweekly e- newsletter goes out to 8,1.34 subscribers with a bounce rate of 1.1 % and an open rate of 19% • About 700 copies of each month's magazines are distributed a the Chamber, Library, Senior Center, Rec Center, etc. Staff keeps about extra 50 to 100 copies for requests, etc. those locations are out and the extras were gone mid month in August. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -14 - • While digital is growing, given that in the 2016 Citizen Survey 83% of respondents said the magazine was their primary source of information, do we want to go digital before asking them that this coming year? • Push by staff has been to add video content — our HAWK Crosswalk video has over 1,000 views on Youtube and 17,100 on Facebook Reduce the number of parks • Council could place this item on the ballot next year to sell parkland • The assumption being our spending per capita is very hilh compared to most other cities — but make sure we are doing and apples to apples comparison- our $68 per person includes the civic center, events staff, and senior center parking lot work as well as pools and parks and capital equipment used by others (bucket truck) • Data can be confusing as well — does New Braunfels have 1 parks or 39? • Revisit partnerships and charge for new programs to be cost neutral. Other cities may have assets that drive more revenue — access and parking foil the Tube Chute on the river, miniature golf, miniature train ride, paddle boats. Stop adding new parks • We already hear from residev and Kensington Ranch about f • Are we comfortable with difl accessibility to parks, keeping Mr. James provided three options. Option 1. Adjust our budget assumptions — assume higher revenue and/or lower expenses • Does that really change our situation? When revenue is higher, and expenses are lower, those "leftover" funds are rolled over to the next year to be prioritized and spent. So, we don't really gain any additional funds — we just move it up one year. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -15 - • It is very problematic to come up short on revenue and /or high on expenses — we have to make cuts midyear where we can — not where we would choose to. • Despite our pessimistic /conservative estimating of revenues our sale tax revenue has declined 3 times in the past 10 years. • We read about cities that have this happen • Often spending shortfalls are programs that run behind schedule and the money is rolled over to the next year • Savings in spending comes from high staff vacancies and turnover — something we are working to change — which would reduce the amount of, savings. Option 2. Quickly make cuts to programs and departments to maintain the current tax rate. As noted cuts this significant cannot be made with • Cuts this significant necessitate us making cli, our vision of what we want Schertz to be. • It also shifts the focus we have going forwar, and benefits and staffing levels appropriate to not funding in the 5 -year model Option 3. (Staff recommends) maintenance and levels of service: Strategic Play xd adjusting have discussed — competitive pay of service expectations as there is • Identify other areas, like maintenance, where service levels are below desired levels and determine appropriate course of action to correct. • As part ofrixt year's budget, cut taxes if revenue is adequate to fund over the long- term services at the reevaluated and established level. Examples to Evaluate • Senior Center Program and Costs • Park Master Plan Standards • AACOG ART Bus program • Schertz Magazine • Recreation Partnerships • Civic Center 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -16 - • Trash Collection /Recycling /Shredding /Chipping Option 4. Approve budget at the current or effective tax rate with the expanded programs proposed at those levels. • Over the course of this year evaluate programs to be cut and reallocate those funds next year to increase funding for maintenance Mr. James provided information on the water and waste /water rates that are also going up. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola opened the public hearing and recognized the following who spoke: • Ms. Michelle Womack, 2944 Mineral' Spring ;stated she supports the tax increase because webaw,a, lot to do herei the residents she has talked to are okay with it. Secondly before yon choose to close the Wendy Swan Pool, you need to read the original deed. We agreed to take it and maintain it as a public pool. The verbiage is in there, it is bat the citizens wanted, Mr. lMerrando Heyward, 2628 Hansel Heights, supports the City and its staff and commeride4" them o the budget presentations and the work they did for those budget/cominunity meetings. He appreciates them looking at what is needed for going forward Fitt the future. No one likes paying more taxes, but sometimes we may have to (examples safe paved roads). If citizens want certain things, they have to be wiling to fund hose items. He encourages a citizen survey to see what else people • Mr. John:. Sullivan, 513 Triple Crown, echoed the appreciation of staff and the budget preparation materials, increased transparency for the funding and in particular the need for maintenance of the city facilities, parks and roads. As no one else spoke, Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola closed the public hearing for council comments. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Acting City Manager Brian James who spoke for the sake of transparency. Every year they talk about our water and sewer rates and he wanted 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -17 - to remind them of. (typical 5/8 meter /5,000 ww) the current water rate $70.56 and effective Oct. 2018, it will rise to $75.14. An alternate modified recommendation is to raise it to $73.95. The report was received just late last week. This allows us to remain sustainable and still go up a bit. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized the following councilmembers who spoke: Councilmember Edwards who spoke about the following items: • What is the cost estimated at for redoing Wieden to know what that number is. Answer: $12 -1.6 mi • How many budget workshops did we have? Ans' three public meetings. Number of citizens attendi • Schertz Magazine, could we offer the current v, current process with us? • Look at one -time purchases that can save us in et maintenance) • Chipping services and bulk pickup (Bexar Was citizen) — now an ordinance passed where the cit) • No frills budget, staff has don a great job. He study versus just a class andIc' OM I I study. wants the citizens I'wo council workshops and ,nser: between 4 -8. a shot at streamlining their ency (i.e., a does it. to do it needed in a cost to the we do a manpower w the following: Day, an event that keeps paying dividends because it demonstrates the ty of government spending in one sense. Once a program exists, it never way. H� also spoke about budgets, cuts, taxes, quality of life, narrowing our )n programs, what are we great at, the correct strategy to use, not moving ily;, lost revenue, not doing too much, location, quality of life, etc. Councilmember Gutierrez who spoke about the following: • The city does not have lost revenue, but a shortfall of tax revenue due to exemptions, court fees, etc.; yet at the same time we are seeing an increase in population here. It is amazing seeing some of the citizens coming out to support the tax increase. He thanked Mr. James and Mr. Walters for their presentations explaining our situation. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 18 - Councilmember Davis who spoke about the following: • He has attended city council meetings since he moved here, and this is the biggest discussion he can ever recall on budget. He likes Councilmember Larson's passion and agrees with about 50% of it. He agrees we need to look for efficiencies, make hard calls on what we should /shouldn't do. He spoke about lost revenues (retired, disabled veterans). This is about a $1.4 million impact on our community. Going back to the rollback rate does not make up for that lost revenue. Also, people have different perspectives on what needs are and what wants Arc. He thinks city staff has done a good job telling council what we need to take care of'now. We need to take care of things like our parks, a/c repairs, facilities, etc. We need community input. However, in the past few years we have not been taking care of certain things. We need to break that cycle. Most of the feedback he hay, recently received from Schertz residents have been positive regarding- the tax rate. You can't compare us with Selma. We need to do what is right for our community. Our citizens want `quality of life'. The singular biggesdine item in this budget is increased dollars for maintenance for parks, streets, and facilities. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola stated he thinks we do this budget talk and tax rates backwards. You have to prove the budget, or you can't approve the tax, rate. An increase in the budget doesn't necessarily mean you have t6 ,increase taxes. He likes, option 3. He respects staff. We have the five -year budget pretty, much worked out. Bust "it doesn't really forecast the needs of tomorrow (i.e., roads). He spoke on increasing taxes. He is not buying it. He thinks we have the money in the reserves. He would like to see that we use the rate we have now and then have - honest conversations about where we can cut in the future. Councilmember Kiser thinks staff has done an excellent job presenting this to the community and council: Sure, some things can be cut. Costs have increased, whether it is new employees or something else. There are still a lot of open staff positions. She thinks it is very reasonable what staff is recommending in the budget/tax rate. Councilmember Edwards spoke about the annexation that was done in the past, a large one, to protect this environment and our citizens. He also spoke about the IH -35 corridor and the past, present, and future buildout. He also spoke about the acquisition of the water partnership we own and its necessity. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who moved seconded by Councilmember Kiser to approve Ordinance No. 18 -T -32 first reading. The vote was 5 -2- 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -19 - 0 with Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion Passed. 9. Public Bearing on Proposed Tax Rate — Conduct a public hearing and consideration PH and /or action regarding the adoption of the FY 2018 -19 Tax Rate. (Second required public hearing) (B. James /J. Walters) Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Acting City Manager Brian. James who stated that currently where we are is our tax rate is $0.4911 per $100 evaluation, and we are looking to go up to $0.5146. again, we allocate: the Maintenance and Operation (M &O) rate at $0.3497 and the I &S' portion of $0.1649. The proposed rate is not subject to rollback. Mayor Pro -Teri Scagliola opened the public hearing and recognized the following: Mr. John. Sullivan, 513 Triple Crown, who stated that he is for the increase and wanted to make a point that all of these things play together, you don't just move to a community that has good schools and good parks and expect to have a really low tax rate. He moved here, he did some research and he looked at the website; it says we live in a premier community. It says we care about Parks and it says we have good schools. It says you know your neighborhood on how it looks, we have good roads and then he gets involved in the city and they care about these things. Some on Council are saying we need to subsidize our quality of life for lower taxes for people who want to live here. He is not ok with this and 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 20 - that is not why he chose to live here. The rollback rate is reasonable, it's actually probably not even going to fix most of our problems. This is a good compromise in his opinion. As no one else spoke, Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola closed the public hearing for council comments. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Larson who stated he wanted to clarify and didn't want his thoughts to be misrepresented. Lowering the tax rate is not asking anyone to subsidize anything. Raising the tax rate is asking your neighbors to subsidize the quality of life you want, so that's literally the opposite. But, beyond that he doesn't think we need to ask our neighbors to subsidize all of our hopes and dreams because his entire point is we can increase the quality of life bJaking the current pool of resources which is more than big enough. Because he thinks last year the revenues increased 11% over the previous year and the population growth was significantly less than 11 %, if you add in population growth plus inflation you're still not 14% so our revenues are increasing per capita faster than the combination of population and inflation growth meaning their net real dollars the city has to spend are increasing; and by taking those same resources and focusing on fewer things we would" improve the quality of life instead of having everything we hope and dream for at half quality. The rollback rate is not really a compromise, that's literally the highest we can go withti giving citizens a chance to recall it. •e furth r.eomments and as there were none he need to make a motion. He stated that he is put the statement that the council needs to read igliola stated that what's really interesting is Mr. Walters to assist in figuring out what a ad that if we went to the $0.4910 it would be a ;Bola asked if that is what our current rate is. Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola moved seconded by Councilmember Larson that the property tax rate, be increased by ,the adoption of a tax rate of ($0.4910), which is effectively a (.3 %) increase in the tax rate. The vote 2 -5 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Councilmember Larson voting for and Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Motion Failed. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola called for another motion. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who moved seconded by Councilmember Kiser that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of ($0.5146), which is effectively a (5 %) increase in the tax rate. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who stated that he recognized to the citizens that will view this later that he understands he is raising his own 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 21- taxes and the citizens taxes. He will hold staff accountable for them to streamlining and coming to efficiencies, but realize he is well aware of what he is doing. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola called for the vote. The vote was 5 -2 -0 with, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion Passed. Roll Call Vote Confirmation City Secretary Brenda Dennis provided the Roll Call Vote Workshop Discussion and possible action regarding the Dennis) (Item requested by Council to be broul Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized City information on a possible change and recomnn committee explaining why it would be efficient Council for discussion and to let her know what th Ms. Dei time to hold of a member of be very difficult to recommendation, the have knowledge, =not boards and commissi items 1 -9 Committee. (B. enda Dennis Who provided a change in the interview Ms. Dennis opened it up to cc to do. �ihnember Crawford who stated that he and possibility of having a member from each ;elected: That way we would have current at questions not relying on a Councilmember he stated they don't have to be permanently fferent candidates for different boards to be ae of those three on the committee, so they e sense. As an example, he was on Planning stated that she does understand what he is asking, this will take a lot individuals set up to come to the interview committee meeting. She if there was a vacant position on the Library, she would have to get a hart board to attend the interview committee meeting, etc. This would ordinate, and it would require more time. She stated that in the members who are chairs have been in the city for a long time, they only Planning and Zoning, but they do have knowledge of the other Councilmember Crawford stands by his recommendation that a senior member on the board for which to be selected to be there and able to ask good questions for someone they are trying to select for that committee. He believes this has a lot of value to it and he is just expressing his concerns about the equity of a good interview. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 22 - Councilmember Edwards stated lets just call this what it was. This was not a problem until what happened recently a few weeks ago when we had a previous councilmember not allowed to be on a committee. However, this could have been prevented as we talked about it previously because he brought up a reservation about that and it was voiced during that meeting. So, with that being said the reason why we are making this change is because of that, it was pushed and illustrated. He doesn't mind if someone sits on the committee, the changes here, he doesn't have a problem with it. But we are on a slippery slope here when things don't go your way we want to make a change, is that what we are trying to do now? Is that how we are governing, that's a problem. Things that were done previously were unprofessional. If this change is conducive to what his colleagues want to do, he doesn't have a problem with it. Councilmember Davis stated he agrees, 99% of the time that wd been acting under the current process there have been no issues or concerns, no conmentary to the other, otherwise and just recently we had a recommendation and discussion that ultimately came to council, council had a problem with and now.the question is of the recommendation is to change the process. He has seen this happen before from this Council. It happened before with the Council with how we select the Mayor Pto -'Tern and as we can see now we've just gone full circle and gone back to how we use to do it in the past. He is not convinced that necessarily making any changes to our interview process warrants a change. We haven't had a problem in the past, we had spirted discussion and some dissention on the recommendations of the interview board recently, but we moved through it. To him that is one of the reasons why we're up here is to speak our mind: and as was said earlier to vote our conscience and make a decision. Every decision ,he "makes up here, I make a friend, and I make an enc and I make someone happy and f make someone sad. At the end of the day he vote � is conscience and convictions. He does not see the need to change. If it's not broke don't fix it and he doesn't think it's broken. Councilmember Gutierr z asked how many boards and committees do we have in total? In answer 1 s: Dennis paused tct provide the answer, but about 9 she believed, but wasn't sure. Councilmember Gutierrez stated, exactly, logistically it would be impossible to get one from every board and committee" to be made available for a specific date and time to conduct several interviews. He agrees with his colleagues here and he does like the fact that I put,the most important committees as part of the interviews. He stated that the points made by the City Secretary are well taken and the breakout is exactly what we need getting the three most important positions on the committee. He complimented the City Secretary for thinking this over'. Councilmember Larson stated that Councilmembers Davis and Edwards were nice not to name him, but he will just say it, he was the one who asked for this. The history of his perception is we had a process, the process broke. It was embarrassing for the City, so he said lets evaluate the process and he thinks if something doesn't go your way and the process breaks, evaluating the process is the responsible thing to do, although the determination may very well be "it didn't work that time but it's still the best process ". Ultimately what happened that caused him to ask for you to look into this was a majority of the members present at the recommendation Interview Committee said they wanted to 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 23 - make a recommendation and then the same members who were part of the committee that sent the recommendation had a problem with it. That's fine, people change their minds, there could be confusion but the reason the process broke wasn't because anybody was wrong in saying what they believed, it was because there are too many councilmembers represented on the committee. You can't have a majority of councilmembers be the recommending people making the recommendation to council and those who made the recommendation to council decide not to recommend the individuals. It was confusing, and it was crazy that's what happened. That is why he asked that this item be discussed. The process actually broke, it was embarrassing to the city, it was unfair to some of our residents. If it is one out of a million and it's not worth fixing, it's fine. He thinks it makes sense to dilute the Council's power on the interview committee because ultimately, we are going to have the ability to review the recommendation anyway. Having a smaller representation of council and a great representation of boards and committees that these individuals are going to actually serve on makes absolutely logically, sense, and probably the most reasonable thing to do. He asked Ms. Tennis if we did make the change that was brought forward and implemented the recommendation brought forward would this cause a significant change in the resources you have to expand., In answer, Ms. Dennis stated in thinking about this she did contact the TSAC Chaifwho agreed to be part of the Interview Committee. There are three councilmembers now, bbl this means it would go to two, and replace with the TSAC chairman., Councilmember Larson ,greed it makes sense to increase the role of board members. Councilmember Davis expressed his opini would be a better fit than the individual. fr, quality of life issues a Iot in comparison i other options. He feels changing the numt three to two doon't eliminate the prior con( i that , representative from the Parks Board i TSAC due to the fact that Parks deals with issues with speedhumps. He stated there are of Councilmembers on the committee from n brought up. It was the 'cohsensus :after discussion to make no changes to the current make up of the Interview Committee. Councilmember Davis stated since it is on the agenda for `possible action' he would like to make a motion. Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized Councilmember Davis who moved seconded by Councilmember Edwards that no changes be made to the Interview Committee process. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Edwards, Kiser, and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion Passed. Closed Session 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 24 - 1.0. City Council will meet in closed session under Section 551.074 of the Texas Government Code, Personnel Matters to deliberate the appointment, employment, evaluation, reassignment, duties, discipline, or dismissal of the City Manager. Council did not meet. Requests and Announcements • Announcements by the Acting City Manager. Mr. James recognized Director of Planning and ( had only one item on the agenda. Today is her h anything popped up. As it was, Planner T Emily, Kuddos to Lesa for her dedication. • Requests by Mayor and agenda. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola reco, next agenda to discuss the pos verbatim minutes we are doing. Councilmember Crawford requested the Animal Services Ir)artment. ity Development Lesa Wood who but she' wanted to be here in case Vas able to' handle it all just fine. on a future, Citv Council nber Miser who requested an item for the to action ;minutes rather than the current regarding a discussion on Councilmember'Davis requested an item regarding green space. Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola stated staff had answered his concerns on, that so he did not ask for it to be put on. Councilmember Davi thin asked E t'an information item for the council packet next time on the matter, • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers Councilmember Davis stated he recently had a wonderful tour of the children's area of the Library. They are doing some great things there. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he attended the TML Regional meeting and Alan Cockerell's retirement gathering and wanted to say Thank You for his service. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 25 - Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola also attended Mr. Cockerell's retirement. He gave exceptional service to us and Seguin and Cibolo. His talents will definitely be missed. Councilmember Edwards reminded his colleagues to look at the TML updates because they are trying to force things on cities and tell us how to run our cities. We need to look at this and be versed on it for the future. 11. Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR • Monthly update on large projects /CIP. (D. Wait /J. • Pending informational items. Adjournment As there was no further business, Mayor Pro -Tem Brer adj 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 26 - Buckingham) the meeting at 9:33 p.m. Mayor Pro -Tem As Ak Alk c., } ak t 4 s ..,..... � .; ,, i ..,..,$ sr• � t .,.,,: £ 2.:i1 t <xa< �t'. i,q � . ., i'I$� ��4�. .�Sf .�:t f t �; � �£t , ���1 f ,�z s '�iy'4'h .,,t R s s?t 4�� ���J�iss� a ��si�'' ���s=lf .:�... `•3t{{tz)y tr?�1 ''� t •�t�S j {'s�r£t�slr'i fr��r }�..ft�����''f ;3; # a £� ����ti,�.,os,, � ° it rt .3�,t��t :��� ,.. +z' „ 1 ti �,�`�S €. Right Sicte Kennels Drain clogged with food-rodent attractant WN , 4 Ah I I I -Ili s r "w�f gy"'};`r�.�°*,vr' -:& �',.m. INNt ,"�,, �`��t �yb � �tt�. 'iYyj'��`�.'wi,i''r ,f'�ii� U�iik $?'�$r t] $'"d'`d'• ��, .,� i `P/ a g "^� "�"�ka ��� "'�e r"+ tz� i r1 q m wt TV km t. L �rtr 3 mkm Y.?;n &al Im } �. :'`�. se i_' t z t'��` � � tYt�' ,Y ,5 ��'k 1 {114YrS�'� } j, � �Y; }rt�� � . �� n, } S �t ��, * 4 }E tS ; � { , �„� � ' "4 ,,;'fit a � Y , Y� h'ytt:. .�4`;, y tSfj �{; 5 ,,.tt' � �:i u w', � , �' " � � � �� ; ,� &� �. Y�` 1��: t���t��l� .'�,` k%iud' a,�Na�, t Zt.. ti' E a! � � { }i iY���t Ye �} lj },t s�� � �� is �r ;ij }))�3}��.~�: ;f � �� } .3 yyy�9 }} {31 5 +,� #.r.", � tlt }IYS3Y$J + J,1.Y .,k.t . `f��} iir�. § kT am i 1 t m) � y r, alt t t � sjt� �i aj r;1r i• S) )Y )) )�# Ott ni. ��; �� �t ��i Y��3r� ��i� t'•xr�7j 2YJ1 �� � 51 �t�it ��)�4t Women's Restroom Observed in this state 8/30-8/31 ............... "t Agenda No. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Administration Subject: Cancellation of the October 2, 2018 City Council meeting due to National Night out, cancelling the October 9, 2018 City Council meeting due to TML in Fort Worth and cancelling the November 6, 2018 City Council meeting due to the election. As has been past practice, City Council has cancelled the first meeting of October in observance of National Night out. It has also been the practice to cancel the City Council meeting during the Texas Municipal. League Conference and cancel the City Council meeting on Election Night. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the cancellation of the October 2, 2018 City Council meeting due to National Night out, cancelling the October 9, 2018 City Council meeting due to TML in Fort Worth and cancelling the November 6, 2018 City Council meeting due to the election CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 . Department: EMS Agenda No. 3 Subject: Resolution No. 18 -R -123 Authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with R. Donovan Butter, D.O. for EMS Medical Direction. BACKGROUND Schertz Emergency Medical Services provides regional ambulance transportation to the communities of Schertz, Cibolo, Live Oak, Marion, Santa Clara, Selma and Universal City. We also serve Comal County ESD #6 which includes the City of Garden Ridge, Bracken community and the areas along F.M. 3009 to State Highway 46. Emergency Medical Services (EMS) personnel are required to work under the direction and license of a qualified Medical Director. The Medical Director reviews medical procedures, writes medical protocols and serves as oversight for the prescribed patient care to ensure that the treatment is appropriate. Dr. Butter has been the EMS Medical Director since September 9, 1993 when he was appointed by Mayor Sawyer. It was a unanimous vote by Councilmembers Joe Potempa, Hal Baldwin, Mary March and Ken Greenwald. The duties of a Medical Director are extensive and the ultimate responsibility for the skills and care provided by the medics in our service rest on the EMS Medical Director. The agreement includes an initial term of 1.2 months, to be automatically renewed for four (4) successive terms of twelve (12) months each unless terminated in accordance with this Agreement. FISCAL IMPACT The EMS department intends to pay Dr. Butter from the approved budget not to exceed $52,000 per fiscal year (or 1.2 -month term). RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 18 -R -123 authorizing the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with R. Donovan Butter, D.O. for EMS Medical Director Services. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 18 -R -123 Medical Direction Agreement RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -123 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH R. DONOVAN BUTTER, D.O. FOR EMS MEDICAL DIRECTION WHEREAS, the City of Schertz EMS provides ambulance services to the City of Schertz and other surrounding communities and emergency services districts; and WHEREAS, a Medical Director is required for an EMS agency per Texas Administrative Code, Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 157; and WHEREAS, the State of Texas recognizes EMS as a physician -led medical practice with delegated practice to certified EMS providers; and WHEREAS, the delegation of practice to EMS providers requires patient care protocols, appropriate oversight of the care provided and appropriate continuing education all provided by a physician medical director; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that this agreement should facilitate the maintenance of quality services to patients served by the Department and in increasing the administrative and management efficiency of the department; and WHEREAS, the Medical Director is willing to enter into this agreement and undertake the responsibility of providing the medical director services required by the City in accordance with recognized medical standards and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Medical Director is experienced in the performance of the duties of medical director of an emergency medical services department. THEREFORE, City Staff recommends that City Council authorize the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with R. Donovan Butter, D.O. for EMS Medical Direction. THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the Acting City Manager to enter into an agreement with Robert Donovan Butter, DO for EMS Medical Direction with annual compensation not to exceed $52,000 as set forth in the Agreement attached as Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this I Ith day of September, 2018. . CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A FEW EMS Medical Director Agreement This Medical Director Agreement (this "Agreement ") is between the City of Schertz, Texas (the "City ") and R. Donovan Butter, D.O.( the "Medical. Director "). Recitals WHEREAS, the City of Schertz EMS provides ambulance services to the surrounding communities and emergency services districts; and WHEREAS, a Medical Director is required for an EMS agency per Texas Administrative Code, Title 25, Part 1, Chapter 157; and WHEREAS, the State of Texas recognizes EMS as a physician -led medical practice with delegated practice to certified EMS providers; and WHEREAS, the delegation of practice to EMS providers requires appropriate oversight to ensure quality of care and the safety of patients cared for within the practice; and WHEREAS, the City has determined that this agreement should facilitate the maintenance of quality services to patients served by the Department and in increasing the administrative and management efficiency of the department; and WHEREAS, the Medical Director is willing to enter into this agreement and undertake the responsibility of providing the medical director services required by the City in accordance with recognized medical standards and upon the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Medical Director is experienced in the performance of the duties of medical director of an emergency medical services department. Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual promises of the parties hereto, and of the covenants and conditions hereinafter expressed, the parties hereby agree and covenant, each with the other, as follows: 1. Medical Director's Representations and Warranties The Medical. Director hereby represents and warrants to the City as follows: 1.1 Licensure. The Medical Director is and at all times during the term hereof shall remain, duly licensed and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas to engage in the unrestricted practice of medicine and to administer and prescribe controlled substances. The Medical Director represents and warrants that his license to practice medicine and certificate to prescribe controlled substances in the State of Texas or in any other jurisdiction has never been denied, terminated suspended, probated, revoked voluntarily relinquished under threat of disciplinary action, or restricted in any way. 1.2 Disclosure and Notice. The Medical Director shall immediately notify the City in writing in the event that the representation concerning the Medical Director set forth in this Agreement within the knowledge of the Medical Director is no longer true, correct, or complete. The Medical Director agrees to notify the City in writing within five (5) calendar days of the receipt of notice of the commencement of any investigation into (or regulatory action involving) his practice or concerning his or her medical license by the State of Texas Board of Medical Examiners, the Texas Attorney General, the Office of Inspector General, the United States Justice Department, or any entity of Federal State, or Local Government. 2. Medical Director's Obligations 2.1 Appointment of Medical Director. The City hereby engages the Medical Director to serve as Medical Director of the Department, and the Medical Director hereby accepts such engagement, all subject to terms and conditions of this Agreement. 2.2 Services. The Medical Director shall provide the services set forth on Exhibit A during the hours set forth on Exhibit A and incorporated herein by reference. 2.3 City Approval. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Medical Director's engagement to serve as Medical Director of the Department shall be subject to the City's continuing approval. The City shall be entitled, with or without prior notice to refuse the Medical Director permission to utilize any City facility or equipment if such action is deemed by the City necessary or advisable in the best interest of patient care. 2.4 Medical Records. The Medical Director shall approve accurate and complete medical records in accordance with Section 6. 2.5 Risk Management. The Medical Director shall cooperate with the Director of the Department. 2.6 Quality Assurance/ Utilization Review and Peer Review Programs. In addition to any particular services to be provided by the Medical Director set forth on Exhibit A, the Medical Director shall, if requested by the Director of the Department, assist the Director of the Department in developing, implementing, monitoring and reviewing the quality assurance, utilization review and peer review programs, procedures, guidelines and policies which relate to the Department's medical activities and as such required by City policies, by Medicare Law and regulations, by the standards or reports of all applicable regulatory, licensing, or accrediting agencies. If any regulatory, accrediting, or licensing agency or the City should determine that the Department does not meet or exceed the acceptable standards prescribed and which are the responsibility of the Medical Director to satisfy under this Agreement, any and all action necessary to effect compliance shall be taken by the Medical Director within a reasonable time (not to exceed (30) days unless otherwise agreed by the City) after the details of noncompliance are given by written notice to the Medical. Director. The Medical. Director shall comply with any and all procedures, guidelines, and policies relating to the Department's quality assurance, utilization review, and peer review programs. 2.7 Indemnification. The Medical. Director shall protect in all legal actions, indemnify, and hold harmless the City from and against any claims or loss to persons or property to which the City may be put or subjected by reason of any act, action, negligence, omission, or default on the part of the Medical Director in connection with the conduct and performance of the services under this Agreement. (a) To the extent permitted by law, the City shall protect in all legal actions, indemnify, and hold harmless the Medical Director from and against any claims or loss to persons or property to which the Medical Director may be put or subjected by reason of any act, action, negligence, omission, or default on the part of the City in connection with the conduct and performance of the services under the Agreement. 2.8 Tncurrin2 Financial Obligations. The Medical Director agrees and acknowledges that he does not have any right, power, or authority to incur and will not incur any financial obligation, legal obligation, or liability, or other obligation on behalf of or binding upon the City. The Medical Director hereby agrees to fully indemnify and hold the City harmless from and against all such financial obligations, legal obligations, or liabilities, or other obligations which directly or indirectly bind the City, its officers or employees that the Medical Director enters into or incurs without the express prior written approval of the Director of the Department. 2.9 Professional Expenses. The Medical Director shall be solely responsible for all personal and professional expenses incurred by him to render services under this Agreement. 2.10 Professional Liability Insurance. The City shall name the Medical Director as an insured party on the City's general liability coverage through the TML intergovernmental risk pool and shall provide the Medical. Director with evidence thereof. 2.11 Compliance with Law. The services provided by the Medical Director shall be provided in accordance with all applicable provisions of the law and other rules and regulations of any governmental authority relating to the activities contemplated by this Agreement. 3. City's Obligations 3.1 Space; Equipment. The City shall make available during the term of this Agreement the space and equipment it deems are reasonably required for the proper operation and conduct of the Department and the Medical Director's services hereunder. The Medical Director agrees that such space and equipment are currently adequate. 3.2 Supplies. The City shall purchase for the Department all supplies it deems reasonably requires for the proper operation of the Department. 3.3 Personnel Provided by the City. The City shall make available during the term of this Agreement such personnel that it deems reasonable and necessary for the effective operation of the Department. The selection and retention, as well as direction and control of such personnel shall be by the employees of the City. 4. Consideration 4.1 Consideration. The City shall pay the Medical Director an amount not to exceed $52,000 during the initial or any successive term of this Agreement, payable in monthly payments for his services hereunder. 5. Confidentiality 5.1 Confidential Information. The Medical Director acknowledges that in connection with the performance of his services under this Agreement, the Medical Director may acquire and make use of certain confidential information ( "Confidential Information "). Therefore, in order to protect the Confidential Information, the Medical Director shall not after the date hereof use the Confidential Information except in connection with the performance of the services required by this Agreement, or divulge the Confidential Information to any third party, unless the City consents in writing or such use or divulgence or disclosure of Confidential Information. The Medical Director shall immediately provide written notice to the Director of the Department of such request or demand, including a copy of written element of such request or demand. Upon termination of this Agreement, the Medical Director will not take or retain, without prior written authorization from the Director of the Department, any papers, patient records, files or other documents or copies thereof or other Confidential Information of any kind belonging to the City pertaining to patients or operations of the Department, without limiting other possible remedies for the breach of this covenant, such relief to be without the necessity of posting a bond, cash or otherwise. 6. Records 6.1 Medical Records and Reports. In performing his duties hereunder, the Medical Director agrees that he shall approve medical records and reports pertaining to patients treated, which records and reports shall be prepared, kept and filed in accordance with the Department's rules, regulations, and policies. All such records and reports shall be and remain the property of the City unless otherwise provided by law. The parties recognize that the patient has the legal right to have access to his or her medical records, and that such records are confidential and privileged under state and federal law. The City expressly agrees that the Medical Director shall have access to such patient records at any time necessary for the Medical Director to fulfill his duties under this Agreement. 7. Term and Termination 7.1 Term and Termination. The Effective Date of this Agreement is set forth on the signature page hereof. 7.2 Term. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect for an initial term of twelve (12) months commencing on the Effective date. 7.3 Automatic Renewal. This Agreement shall be automatically renewed for four (4) successive terms of twelve (12) months each unless terminated in accordance with this Agreement. 7.4 Termination Upon Mutual Consent. This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual written agreement of the parties. 7.5 Termination Without Cause. Either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement, in sole discretion and without cause, upon thirty (60) days prior written notice to the other party. 7.6 Termination for Default. If either party defaults in the performance of its obligations (including compliance with any covenants) under this Agreement and such default is not cured within thirty (30) days of the receipt of written notice thereof, then the non - defaulting party shall have the right (in addition to any other rights it may have) by further written notice to terminate this Agreement on any future date not less than ten (10) days after the date of such further notice. 7.7 Immediate Termination. Either party may terminate this Agreement immediately upon either of the following occurrences: (a) loss of Department Licensure or (b) closure of the Department. 7.8 Termination by the City. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the City shall have the right, in sole discretion, to immediately terminate the entire Agreement upon occurrence of the following: (a) failure by the Medical Director to meet the qualifications required herein; or (b) death of the Medical. Director; or (c) suspension or cessation of the Medical Director's; (i) qualifications to practice medicine in the State of Texas; (ii) state or federal authorization to administer or prescribe controlled substances, (iii) participation in the Medicare or Medicaid programs; or (d) permanent disability (ill health or other disability) of the Medical Director which prevents or makes inadvisable his continued provision of services as contemplated by the Agreement without reasonable accommodation; or (e) determination by the City that patient health or safety is in imminent and serious danger from the Medical Director's actions or inactions; or (f) indictment of the Medical Director for a felony; or (g) determination by the City Council of the City that the Medical Director has taken some action to cause material harm t the reputation of the City or the Department; or (h) violation by the Medical Director to cooperate with his or her peers or the employees and staff of the Department 7.9 Post — Termination Obligations. The termination of this Agreement shall not relieve either party of any obligations pursuant to this Agreement which arose on or before the effective date of termination, and those Sections of this Agreement which by their terms extend beyond termination or expiration of this Agreement shall survive and continue in full force and effect after the expiration of the term hereof or any termination of this Agreement. 8. Dispute Resolution 8.1 Definition of Dispute. "Dispute" means any and all questions, claims controversies, or disputes arising out of or relating to this Agreement, including the validity, construction, meaning, performance, effect, or breach of this Agreement, but excluding disputes or actions under Sections 7.3, 7.5, 7.8(b), 7.8(e), or 7.8(g). 8.2 Negotiation. In the event of a Dispute between the parties, the parties shall promptly, amicable, and in good faith attempt to resolve such Dispute through negotiations. A disputing party shall give written notice of the Dispute to the other party that shall contain a brief statement of the nature of the Dispute. If the parties are unable to resolve the Dispute within fifteen (l 5) days of receipt by the adverse party of written notice of Dispute, the parties shall submit the Dispute to mediation as set forth in Section 8.3. 8.3 Mediation. If a Dispute arises between the parties to this Agreement, it shall be submitted to mediation in accordance with the Commercial Mediation :Rules and Procedures of the American Arbitration Association ( "AAA "). The parties shall attempt to agree upon an impartial mediator to mediate the Dispute, but if they are unable or find or appoint a mediator within ten (10) days of the filing of a written request for mediation with the AAA, the AAA will appoint a qualified mediator to serve. The mediation shall be held in Guadalupe County, Texas within thirty (30) days after appointment of the mediator. Each party is responsible for its own expenses. 8.4 Interim Measures. At any time after submission of a written notice of Dispute, either party may request a court competent jurisdiction to grant interim measures of protection: (a) to preserve the status quo pending resolution of the Dispute, (b) to prevent the destruction of documents and other information or things related to the Dispute, and /or (c) to prevent the transfer, dissipation, or hiding of assets. A request for such interim measures to a judicial authority shall not be deemed incompatible with the provisions of this Section 8 or a waiver of a party's rights to arbitrate. 8.5 Tolling of Limitations Period. By submitting a written notice of Dispute pursuant to Section 8.2, all applicable statutes of limitations and defenses based on the passage of time shall be tolled while negotiation, mediation, and arbitration proceedings are diligently conducted pursuant to the Section 8. The parties will take such action, if any, required to effectuate such tolling. 8.6 Termination. This section shall not prevent either party from electing to terminate this Agreement in accordance with provisions of Section 7, subject to this Section 8. 9. General Provisions 9.1 Patient Complaints. The parties agree to cooperate with each other in resolution of any patient complaints arising out of the services provided hereunder. All patient complaints shall be resolved in accordance with procedures established by the City. 9.2 Corporate Practice of Medicine. Nothing contained herein is intended to constitute the use of a medical license for practice of medicine by anyone other than a licensed physician, or to do any other act or create and other arrangements in violation of the Texas Medical Practice Act. The parties specifically acknowledge the following: (a) This Agreement contemplates nothing more than the delivery of medical director services by the Medical Director to the City. (b) There shall be no sharing of profits or splitting of fees between the Medical. Director and the City. (c) The City claims no right, title or interest in any of the assets of the Medical Director, and none such assets shall be used for the benefit of the City. 9.3 Relationship of Parties. 9.3.1 Independent Contractor Status. In performing his responsibilities pursuant to the Agreement, it is understood and agreed that the Medical Director is at all times acting as an independent contractor and that the Medical Director is not a partner, joint — venture, or employee of the City. The City shall neither have nor exercise any control or direction over the medical judgment of the Medical Director nor over the methods or manner by which the Medical. Director performs his work and functions under this Agreement. It is expressly agreed that the Medical Director will not for any purpose be deemed to be an agent, ostensible or apparent agent or servant of the City, and the parties agree to take any and all such action as may be reasonably requested by the City to inform the public, patients of the Department, and others utilizing the services of the Department of such fact. 9.3.2 Compensation, Fringe Benefits, Taxes. The Medical Director understands and agrees that: (a) the Medical Director shall not be entitled to any salary or other compensation from the City or to any employee benefits provided by the City, including , but not limited to disability, life insurance, pension and annuity benefits, educational allowances, professional membership dues, and sick, holiday, or vacation pay; (b) the City will not withhold income taxes or pay Social Security or unemployment taxes for the Medical Director; and (c) the Medical Director shall indemnify and hold harmless the City against any and all liability related to withholding or failure to withhold income taxes or paying or not paying Social Security or unemployment taxes for the Medical Director. If the Internal Revenue Service or any other governmental agency challenges the independent contractor status contractor status of the Medical Director, the parties agree that the Medical Director and the City shall have the right to participate in any discussion or negotiation that occurs in the course of such a challenge. 9.4 Conformance with Law. The parties recognize this Agreement is subject to, and agree to comply with, applicable statutes, rules, or regulations that invalidate any term of this Agreement, that are inconsistent with any term of this Agreement, or that would cause one or both of the parties hereto to be in violation of law shall be deemed to have superseded the terms and intent of this Agreement to the greatest extent possible consistent with the requirements of applicable statutes, rules, and regulations and negotiate in good faith towards amendment of this Agreement in such respect. 9.5 Fraud and Abuse Law and Texas Health and Safety Code. The parties enter into this agreement with the intent of conducting their relationship in full compliance with applicable federal, state and local law including the Medicare and Medicaid Anti -Fraud and Abuse laws and the Texas Medical Practice Act and Texas Health and Safety Code. Notwithstanding any unanticipated effect of any of the provisions herein, no party will intentionally conduct itself under the terms of this agreement in a manner to constitute a violation of the Medicare and Medicaid Anti -Fraud and Abuse Law. In the event that any federal or state court or federal or state agency of competent jurisdiction, or legal counsel of the Medical. Director or the City in its reasonable opinion, determines that this agreement or any material provision of this agreement violates any federal, state, or local law, rule or regulation, the parties shall negotiate in good faith to amend this agreement or the relevant provision hereof to remedy such violation in a manner that will not be inconsistent with the intent of the parties to such provision. If the parties cannot reach an agreement on such amendment, however, then either party may immediately terminate this agreement 9.6 Change in Law. If there is any federal, state or local law, regulation, or rule, which affects this agreement or the activities of either party under this agreement, or any change in judicial or administrative interpretation of any such law, regulation, or rule and either party reasonably believed in good faith that the change will have a substantial adverse effect on that party's business operations or its rights or obligations under this agreement, then such party may upon written notice, require the other party to enter into good faith negotiations to renegotiate the terms of this agreement. If the parties are unable to reach an agreement concerning the modification of this agreement within the earlier if forty -five (45) days after the date of the notice seeking renegotiation or the effective date of the change, or if the change is effective immediately, then either party may immediately terminate this agreement by written notice to the other party. 9.7 Governing Law and Venue. This agreement shall be constructed and governed according to the laws of the State of Texas, without giving effect to its conflict of laws provisions. Subject to Section 8, any suit, action, or proceeding against the Medical Director with respect to this Agreement, or any judgment entered by any court in respect thereof may be brought in the Courts of the State of Texas as the City in its sole discretion may elect, and the Medical Director hereby submits to the non - exclusive jurisdiction of such courts for the purpose of any such suit, action or proceeding. The Medical Director hereby irrevocably waives any obligation which he may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any suit, action, or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Agreement brought in the courts located in Guadalupe County, and hereby further irrevocably waives any claim that any suit, action or proceeding brought in any such court has been brought in an inconvenient forum. 9.8 Assignment. No assignment of this agreement of rights and obligations hereunder shall be valid without the prior written consent of the non - assigning party. 9.9 No Referral. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall require (directly or indirectly, explicitly or implicitly) either party to refer any patients to any other party or to use any other party's facilities as a precondition to receiving the benefits set forth herein. 9.10 Rights and Property. The Medical Director acknowledges and agrees that this agreement shall not be deemed to grant any leasehold, property, or other ownership interest of any nature in the City's real property, equipment, furnishings, or supplies but all rights as are given to the Medical Director hereby shall be in the nature of contract. 9.11 Notices. Any notice to a party hereto pursuant to this agreement shall be given in writing by the personal delivery, overnight delivery, facsimile, telecommunications, or United States certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed as set forth on the signature page hereof. The parties shall hereafter notify each other in accordance herewith of any change of address to which notice is required to be sent. Notice shall be effective upon delivery. 9.12 Parties Bound. This agreement and the rights and obligations hereunder shall be binging upon and inure to the benefit of the parties, the Medical Director, and their permitted assigns. 9.13 Duty of Good Faith. The parties hereto agree to perform their respective covenants and obligations under this agreement fairly and in good faith, and also to act fairly and in good faith in the enforcement of their respective rights hereunder. 9.14 No Third -Party Beneficiaries. No provision of this agreement is intended to benefit any person or entity who is not a party to this agreement, nor shall any person or entity not a party to this Agreement have any right to seek to enforce or recover any right or remedy with respect hereto. 9.15 Non - Waiver. No waiver by either of the parties hereto of any failure by the other party to keep or perform any provision, covenant, or condition of this agreement shall be deemed to be a waiver of any preceding or succeeding breach of the same, or any other provision, covenant, or condition. 9.16 Additional Documents. Each of the parties hereto agrees to execute any documents that may be requested from time to time by the other party to implement or complete such party's obligations pursuant to this agreement. 9.17 Section Headings. The headings preceding the text of the several Sections of this agreement are inserted solely for convenience of reference and shall not constitute a part of this agreement, nor shall they affect the meaning, construction, or effect of any section hereof. 9.18 Gender and Number. Whenever the context of this agreement requires, the gender of all words herein shall include the masculine, feminine, and neuter, and the number of all words herein shall include the singular and plural. 9.19 Entire Agreement. This agreement, including any exhibits or addenda indentified and incorporated by reference herein, contains the entire understanding of the parties and supersedes any prior written or oral agreements or understandings among them concerning the subject matter set forth above. There are no representations, warranties, covenants, promises, agreements, arrangements, or understandings, oral or written express or implied among the parties hereto relating to the subject matter set forth above which have not been fully expressed herein. 9.20 Amendments. This agreement can be amended only by an instrument in writing signed by the parties. Amendments to this agreement shall be effective as of the date stipulated therein. 9.21 Severability. The sections, paragraphs, and individual provisions contained in this agreement shall be considered severable from the remainder of this agreement, and in the event that any section, paragraph, or other provision should be determined to be unenforceable as written for any reason, such determination shall not adversely affect the remainder of the sections, paragraphs or other provisions of this agreement. It is agreed further that in the event any section, paragraph, or other provision is determined to be unenforceable, the parties shall use their best efforts to reach agreement on an amendment to the agreement to supersede such served section, paragraph or provision. 9.22 Counterparts. This document may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. EXECUTED effective as of October 1, 2018 . (the "Effective date ") City of Schertz, Texas Acting City Manager Notice Address: City of Schertz, Texas 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, TX 78154 Attn: City Manager Medical Director R. Donovan Butter, D.O. Notice Address: R. Donovan Butter D.O Exhibit A Specific Duties of the Medical Director include: Will develop and review standards and protocols governing every aspect of prehospital operations affecting patient care, and shall develop, implement and document a process for monitoring compliance with those standards. Such standards shall govern dispatch center operations, delivery of first responder services and ground ambulance services. All standards, monitoring, actions and performance will be accomplished in accordance with the Texas Medical Practice Act (Chapters 151 -165 of the Texas Occupations Code), Chapter 197 of the Texas State Medical Board Rules, Chapter 773 of the Texas Health and Safety Code, or any other relevant laws, regulations or rules; Will be responsible for the Priority dispatching protocols, telephone protocols and pre- arrival instruction protocols, as appropriate, for dispatching ambulances and first responders; Will oversee the standards for training, testing, certifying and monitoring the performance of ambulance personnel, and first responders; Will approve the level of prehospital care which may be rendered by prehospital EMS personnel upon their entry into the EMS system; Will direct an effective system audit and quality assurance program to include chart reviews and direct personal observation of first responder and ambulance service operations; Will make formal recommendations on medically related aspects of operation of the EMS including the inspection, evaluation, and approval of the system's performance specifications; Provide guidance with respect to equipment and supply standards for ambulance, first responder vehicles, ordering, stocking and replacement of drugs, and compliance with laws and regulations impacting upon the agency's acquisition, storage and use of those drugs; At least annually, an assessment of each EMS provider as to whether the EMS provider has demonstrated competency in the knowledge and skills an EMS provider must have to competently perform the skills within the scope of practice of the EMS provider at that level; Withdraw responsibility for EMS personnel for noncompliance with the Emergency Medical Services Act, (Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 773) Chapter 197 of the Texas State Medical. Board Rules, accepted medical standards or other relevant laws, regulations or rules; Will attend monthly clinical and staff meetings as appropriate; Other services as agreed upon by the Director of the Department and the Medical Director. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: Department: Subject: BACKGROUND: Agenda No. 4 September 11, 2018 City Council Resolution No. 18 -R -125 — Consideration and/or action approving a resolution approving the roof & exterior repairs and parking expansion project of facilities of the Guadalupe Appraisal District, County of Guadalupe The Guadalupe Appraisal District (G.A.D.) Board of Directors would like to move forward with building renovations of roof and exterior repairs and expansion of the parking facility (the project). The location of this project is at 3000 N. Austin St., Seguin, Texas 78155. Design development of this project has been substantially completed. As you know from our recent notification of requested budget amendments sent on November 2, 2017 and on June 7, 2018, our office is in need of these roof repairs and the parking expansion. It has been determined that the associated costs with alternatives such as a new roof of the original building (1984) would be a more expensive option to proceed with, and thus repairs to the roof of the original building would be the best option to proceed with at this time. The parking expansion is proposed to accommodate current spacing needs with the facility master plan expanding this parking in the future. Before this necessary project can be pursued, our action is required to approve this project. §6.051(b) of the Texas Property Tax Code prescribes this approval process. The first step of the approval process requires that the :Board of Directors (B.O.D.) approve a resolution proposing the project. During the regular meeting of the B.O.D. held September 5, 2018 the B.O.D. approved a resolution proposing this project. Upon approval of said resolution, the chief appraiser is required to notify the Presiding Officer of each of the entities governing body of the approved resolution, which is the purpose of this letter. The resolution passed proposes the building cost of the project shall not exceed $160,000. Enclosed you will find a copy of the approved resolution by the B.O.D. §6.051(b) states that upon receiving notification of the approved resolution by the B.O.D, the governing body of each taxing unit served by G.A.D. must approve or disapprove by way of resolution the proposed project no later than 30 days after receiving- notification of the approved resolution. With that being said, the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District requests that an action item be placed upon our action agenda as soon as possible Enclosed you will find a sample resolution that your governing body may use for the approval process. §6.051(b) also requires that each entity file with the Chief Appraiser the resolution that was approved by the governing body no later than OCTOBER 15, 2018. Tf this is not filed timely, we will have to treat the resolution as if it were disapproved. COMMUNITY BENEFIT: Overall efficient maintenance of a community building and increased ability to facility parking for property owners for informal and formal hearings. FISCAL IMPACT: The Guadalupe Appraisal District Board of Directors has completed two budget amendments in 2017 and 2018 . to reserve dollars for this project. The reserve amount total available at this time is $ 157,909. The cost not to exceed amount provided by the architect and included in the Guadalupe Appraisal. District resolution is $1.60,000. They don't anticipate any extra funding will be needed, other than normal allocation payments to the Guadalupe Appraisal District that are recalculated once the current year levy is established. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION: Approval required in order that the Guadalupe Appraisal. District will be able to move forward with needed roof /exterior repairs and parking expansion. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 18 -R -125 Letter from the Appraisal District RESOLUTION NO 18 -R -125 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS APPROVING THE ROOF & EXTERIOR REPAIRS AND PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT OF FACILITIES OF THE GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT, COUNTY OF GUADALUPE WHEREAS, the GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT (the DISTRICT) acting by and through its duly authorized and empowered Board of Directors has determined that it is necessary and in the best interest of the DISTRICT, all taxing entities served by the DISTRICT and the public the DISTRICT serves to proceed with roof and exterior repairs and to expand the present facility parking. WHEREAS, on September 5, 2018 the DISTRICT'S Board of Directors passed a resolution proposing the roof and exterior repairs and parking expansion project with the total building cost of said project not to exceed $160,000; WHEREAS, this taxing entity served by the DISTRICT is entitled to vote in accordance with §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code upon the proposed roof and exterior repair and parking expansion project of the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, less than thirty (30) days have passed after the date the Presiding Officer of this taxing entity received notice of the proposal from the DISTRICT: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Presiding Officer of this taxing unit is authorized and directed to certify and file the adoption of this resolution with the DISTRICT not later than ten (10) days after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date the Presiding Officer of this taxing unit received notice of the proposal from the DISTRICT in accordance with the provisions of §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code READ, PASSED, AND APPROVED this the I It" day of September 2018. . By: Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Attested: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary -"UADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT �pD LrjA Main 011ice 3000 N. Austin St. Seguin, Texas 78155 b (830)303 -3313 (830)372 -2874 (Fax) September 6, 2018 Presiding Officer Dear Presiding Officer, Schertz Substation 1101 Elbel Rd. Schertz, Texas 78151 (210)915 -9708 Option 8 The Guadalupe Appraisal District (G.A.D.) Board of Directors would like to move forward with building renovations of roof and exterior repairs and expansion of the parking facility (the project). The location of this project is at 3000 N. Austin St., Seguin, Texas 78155. Design development of this project has been substantially completed. As you know from our recent notification of requested budget amendments sent on November 2, 2017 and on June 7, 2018, our office is in need of these roof repairs and parking expansion. It has been determined that the associated costs with alternatives such as a new roof of the original building (1984) would be more expensive option to proceed with, and thus repairs to the roof of the original building would be the best option to proceed with at this time. The parking expansion is proposed to accommodate current spacing needs with the facility master plan expanding this parking in the future. Before this necessary project can be pursued, your actioiz is mquired to approve this Proiect. §6.051(b) of the Texas Property Tax Code prescribes this approval process. The first step of the approval process requires that the Board of Directors (B.O.D.) approve a resolution proposing the project. During the regular meeting of the B.O.D. held September 5, 2018 the B.O.D. approved a resolution proposing this project. Upon approval of said resolution, the chief appraiser is required to notify the Presiding Officer of each entities governing body of the approved resolution, which is the purpose of this letter. The resolution passed proposes the building cost of the project shall not exceed $160,000. _Enclosed you will find a copy of the approved resolution bx the B.O.D. §6.051(b) states that upon receiving notification of the approved resolution by the B.O.D, the governing body of each taxing unit served by G.A.D. must approve or disapprove by way of resolution the proposed project no later than 30 days after receiving, notification of the approved resolution With that being said, the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District respectfully requests that an action item be placed upon your action agenda as soon as possible and no later than OCTOBER 5, 2018 to approve a resolution of the proposed project. Enclosed you will find a sample resolution that your governing body may use for the approval process. §6.051(b) also reauires that each entity file with the Chief Appraiser the resolution that was approvers by the governing body no safer than OCTOBER 15 2018 If this is not filed timely, ipe will have to treat the resolution as if it were disapproved. An appraisal district representative can be available to discuss with you this process or answer any questions you might have and or to attend the meeting in which this resolution will be discussed and acted upon. Please notify our office as soon as possible in this regard, so we may accommodate your entity in the manner you wish. Respec' 1 Submitted, borne, R.P.A., C.C.A. Ch' f Ap raiser STATE OF TEXAS § RESOLUTION PROPOSING ROOF & EXTERIOR REPAIRS AND PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT OF FACILITIES OF THE GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § WHEREAS, the GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT (the DISTRICT) acting by and through its duly authorized and empowered Board of Directors has determined that it is necessary and in the best interest of the DISTRICT, all taxing entities served by the DISTRICT and the public the DISTRICT serves to proceed with roof and exterior repairs and to expand the present facility parking. WHEREAS, the DISTRICT. Board of. Directors has determined that other alternatives to remedy these items wiil cost significantly more and make a recommendation insofar as the manner with which to proceed with roof and exterior repairs and to expand the present facility parking. WIFIERE,AS, the DISTRICT has determined that the total building cost of roof and exterior repairs and expansion of the parking facility shall not exceed $160,000. WHEREAS, the DISTRICT acknowledges that the DISTRICT is not authorized to proceed with construction or renovation of a building or other improvement without the consent of the taxing entities served by the DT - R -"T in accordance with §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code. MOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Directors of the DISTRICT adopts and endorses the i oof and exterior repairs and expansion of the parking facility project with the total combined cost of building projects not to exceed $160,000. FU RTs�ER, that the Chief Appraiser of the DISTRICT is authorized and directed to take acts necessary to p-ovide the proposed roof and exterior repairs and parking expansion project resolution set forth above to the mr _Ling entities entitled to vote pursuant to §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code. RE AID, , PASSED, AND APPROVED this the J ' day of 2018. By: Dr. Greg Gilcrease, Chairman Attested: Mr. Daryl J Secre r STATE OF TEXAS § RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ROOF & EXTERIOR REPAIRS AND PARKING EXPANSION PROJECT OF FACILITIES OF THE GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § WHEREAS, the GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT (the DISTRICT) acting by and through its duly authorized and empowered Board of Directors has determined that it is necessary and in the best interest of the DISTRICT, all taxing entities served by the DISTRICT and the public the DISTRICT serves to proceed with roof and exterior repairs and to expand the present facility parking. WHEREAS, on September 5, 2018 the DISTRICT'S Board of Directors passed a resolution proposing the roof and exterior repairs and parking expansion project with the total building cost of said project not to exceed $160,000; WHEREAS, this taxing entity served by the DISTRICT is entitled to vote in accordance with §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code upon the proposed roof and exterior repair and parking expansion project of the DISTRICT; and WHEREAS, less than thirty (30) days have passed after the date the Presiding Officer of this taxing entity received notice of the proposal from the DISTRICT: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Presiding Officer of this taxing unit is authorized and directed to certify and file the adoption of this resolution with the DISTRICT not later than ten (10) days after the expiration of thirty (30) days from the date the Presiding Officer of this taxing unit received notice of the proposal from the DISTRICT in accordance with the provisions of §6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code READ, PASSED, AND APPROVED this the Attested: day of 2018. Agenda No. 5 0111 &WOU111►`[4I WiVA 10I01 [o7 710 11110 1 City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Finance Subject: Resolution No. 18 -R -127 — A resolution by City Council updating the Fee Schedule for FY 2018 -19 City Departments collect a wide variety of fees for permits, services, fines and other charges that are all part of everyday operations of municipal government. Since September 2008, the fees have been incorporated into a single fee schedule. Ordinance 08 -M -43 established the consolidated fee schedule and allows for the modification of existing fees to be done by resolution while new fees are established or added to the Fee Schedule by ordinance. The Fee Schedule ordinance provides a single document with all City fees that directly affect the users. The changes to the fees ensures the continued operation of public utilities, provides for essential services to the community and to adequately maintain the investment in existing infrastructure. All changes to the fee schedule will have a 45 -day period before the new fees take into effect. This allows staff to update and advise citizens on the upcoming changes. Recommended effective date of these fee changes will be October 29, 2018. The Fee Schedule for FY 2018 -19 was updated on August 7, 2018. This update did not include utility rate changes as staff was waiting on a formal rate study analysis for a recommendation. Council was informed at the August 7th meeting utility rate changes will be presented separately at a later meeting. The City contracts with Willdan Financial Services to conduct an updated 5 year rate plan each year to ensure any new information is considered when setting next year's rates and to be able to plan for known future costs. The 2017 Rate Plan called for a 6.5% increase, or $4.58 per month, on 5,000 gallons per month water and wastewater users for FY 2018 -19. The updated 2018 Rate :Plan now calls for a 4.8% increase, or $3.39 per month, which was lower than expected due to lower than forecasted administrative costs and debt issuances. The plan is still anticipating additional costs that will come from developing the Guadalupe well field and parallel pipeline as well as the startup costs associated with the Cibolo Valley Local. Government Corporation. Please note the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation base impact fee has been updated to reflect the approved increase effective on August 16, 2018. IIGTVW_ 01u1AWN The proposed increases will impact customers with an average monthly consumption of 5,000 gallons of water and wastewater by a $3.39 per month. These increases will grow water revenue by 3% and sewer revenue by 7% for the Water & Sewer Fund. Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution. No. 1.8 -R -1.27, updating the FY 2018 -1.9 Fee Schedule. ATTACHMENTS Resolution No. 18 -R -127 FY 2018 -19 Proposed Fee Schedule RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -127 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS UPDATING THE FEE SCHEDULE FOR FY 2018 -19, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City of Schertz (the "City ") has established by ordinances and resolutions for fees for licenses, permits, and services provided by the City; and WHEREAS, due to the need for periodic modification of said fees and for the purposes of efficiency, the City Council desires to adopt future fee changes by resolution rather than by ordinance; and WHEREAS, the Schedule of Fees attached as Exhibit A reflects revisions to certain fees, a restatement of certain fees not revised, and a consolidation of all such fees; and WHEREAS, the City conducts and updates a 5 Year Utility Rate Plan annually to maintain current services and to plan for future capital needs and preventing large changes in fees any one year; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to update the fee schedule. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS .........:..... Section 1. The City Council amends the FY 2018 -19 Fee Schedule to update Water and Sewer Fees as reflected in Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this l Ith day of September, 2018. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50506221.1 - 2 - "Exhibit A" City of Schertz Effective October 1st, 2018 Utility Rates Effective October 29th, 2018 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees $ 0.53 $ 0.55 Summary of Changes Sewer Rates 12016-1712017-181 2018 719 Residential Rates (Single Family) 3.35 $ 3.58 $ Base Rate -per month $11.16 $11.72 $ 12.54 Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ City line Maintenance fee plus Franchise fee $ 0.44 $ 0.46 $ 0.49 User Charge based on 100% of avg consumption mo. $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 User avg. based on Nov, Dec, and Jan, min. 500 gals. Base Rate per month $ 3.35 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.32 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.34 $ 8.76 $ 9137 Business and Multi - familv Dwellina Units: Base Rate per month $14.03 $14.73 $ 15.77 The base rate shall be assessed in terms of connection equivalents which shall be as follows: the customer's previous 12 month water consumption as determined at the annual re- rating in February divided by 365, with the results of such division then divided by 245 gallons. The figure arrived at by the second division shall be the customer's "connection equivalent ". Each business shall be assessed a base rate. Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month Line Maintenance - Commercial /Industrial users plus Franchise fee $ 0.53 $ 0.55 $ 0.59 User Charge -based on 100% of water consumed $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.88 $ 4.14 $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.42 $ 8.84 $ 9.46 Public Schools Base Rate per month $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 Base Rate -each public school shall be assessed a $14.03 $14.73 $ 15.77 base rate per connection equivalent determined as in Business and Multi- family dwelling units above. (per month) Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month Line Maintenance - Commercial /Industrial users $ 0.53 $ 0.55 $ 0.59 User Charge -based on 100% of all water consumed $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3!.83 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.88 $ 4.14 $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.42 $ 8.84 $ 9.46 For Information Purposes Only: Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA), Per 1,000 gallons $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 includes 5% franchise fee F, City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 5/8 IN 0 $ 23.89 $ 24.61 $ 2.95 $ 3.04 ? $ 28.09 $ 28.94 ! $ 5.73 $ 5.90 CODE 1 6,000 $ 41.59 ! $ 42.85 ` $ 3.00 $ 3.09 ? $ 62.47 $ 64.37 $ 5.80 $ 5.97 9,000 $ 50.59 $ 52.12 ` $ 3.24 $ 3.34 $ 79.87 $ 82.29 ` $ 6.32 $ 6.49 12,000 $ 60.31 $ 62.14 $ 3.50 $ 3.61 < $ 98.83 $ 101.77 $ 6.80 $ 6.97 15,000 $ 70.81 $ 72.97 $ 3.71 $ 3.82 $ 119.23 $ 122.70 $ 7.20 $ 7.37 18,000 $ 81.94 ! $ 84.43 $ 4.67 $ 4.81 $ 140.83 $ 144.82 - $ 9.06 $ '; 9.23 30,000 $ 137.98 $ 142.15 $ 5.30 $ 5.46 ` $ 249.55 $ 255.64 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.48 45,000 $ 217.48 $ 224.05 $ 5.64 $ 5.81 $ 404.20 $ 412.91 $ 10.97 $ 11.14 60,000 $ 302.08 $ 311.20 $ 5.85 $ 6.03 $ 568.75 $4 580.09 $ 11.35 $ 11.52 75,000+ $ 389.83 $ 401.65 > $ 5.97 $ 6.15 $ 739.00 $ { 752.96 ` $ 11.60 $ 1117 3/4 IN 0 $ 35.82 $ 35.82 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 42.12 $ =' 46.76 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 2 6,000 $ 53.52 $ 53.52 < $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 76.50 $ 82.22 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 9,000 $ 62.52 $ 62.52 ' $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 93.90 $ 100.16 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 12,000 $ 72.24 $ 72.24 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 112.86 $ 119.66 > $ 6.80 $ ` 6.98 15,000 $ 82.74 $ 82.74 ` $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 133.26 $ 140.60 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 18,000 $ 93.87 $ 9187 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 154.86 $ 162.74 ' $ 9.06 $ 9.24 30,000 $ 149.91 $ 149.91 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 263.58 $ 273.63 $ 10.31 $ ! 10.49 45,000 $ 229.41 $ 229.41 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 418.23 $; 430.98 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 60,000 $ 314.01 $ 314.01 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 582.78 $ 598.24 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 75,000+ $ 401.76 $ 401.76 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 753.03 $ 771.19 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 1.0 IN 0 $ 59.70 $ 59.70 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 70.21 $ 77.93 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 3 6,000 $ 77.40 $ 77.40 '' $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 104.59 $ 113.39 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 9,000 $ 86.40 $ 86.40 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 121.99 $' 131.33 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 12,000 $ 96.12 $ 96.12 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 140.95 $ 150.83 ! $ 6.80 $ ! 6,98 15,000 $ 106.62 $ 106.62 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 161.35 $; 171.78 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 18,000 $ 117.75 $ 117.75 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 182.95 $? 193.92 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 30,000 $ 173.79 $ 173.79 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 291.67 $`, 304.80 $ 10.31 $ 10.49' 45,000 $ 253.29 $ 25129 ` $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 446.32 $ 462.15 < $ 10.97 $ 11.15 60,000 $ 337.89 $ 337.89 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 610.87 $ 629.41 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 75,000+ $ 425.64 $ 425.64 - $ 5.97 $ 5:97 $ 781.12 $ 802.36 ` $ 11.60 $ 11.78 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 1 1/2 IN 0 $ 142.84 $ 158.55 $ 2.95 $ 2`.95 $ 140.40 $ 155.85 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 4 15,000 $ 187.09 $ 202.80 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 22635 $ 244.50 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 30,000 $ 232.09 $ 247.80 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 313.35 $ 334.21 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 45,000 $ 280.69 $ 296.40 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 408.15 $ 431.71 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 60,000 $ 333.19 $ 348.90 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 510.15 $ 536.42 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 75,000 $ 388.84 $ 404.55 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 618.15 $ 647.12 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 100,000 $ 505.59 $ 52130 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 844.65 $ 878.13 ` $ 10.31 $ 10.49 125,000 $ 638.09 $ 653.80 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 1,102.40 $ 1,140.39 ? $ 10.97 $ 11.15 150,000 $ 779.09 $ 794.80 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 1,376.65 $ s 1,419.15 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 175,000+ $ 925.34 $ ;941.05 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 1,660.40 $'; 1,707.40 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 2 IN 0 $ 228.53 ! $ 253.67 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 224.65 $ 249.36 < $ 5.73 $ 5.91 SIMPLE 24,000 $ 299.33 $ 324.47 < $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 362.17 $t 391.21 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 COMPOUND 48,000 $ 371.33 $ 396.47 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 501.37 $' 534.74 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 CODE5 72,000 $ 449.09 $ 474.23 $ 3.50 $ 3.50' $ 653.05 $! 690.75 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 96,000 $ 533.09 $ 558.23 < $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 816.25 $ 858.27 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 120,000 $ 622.13 $ 647.27 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 989.05 $ 1,035.40 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 160000 $ 808.93 $ 834.07 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 1,351.45 $ 1,405.02 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 200,000 $ 1,020.93 $ 1;046.07 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 1,763.85 $ 1,824.63 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 240,000 $ 1,246.53 $ 1,271.67 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 2,202.65 $s 2,270.64 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53' 280,000+ $ 1,480.53 $ 1;505.67 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 2,656.65 $ 2,731.85 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 2IN 0 $ 285.66 $ 317.08 ` $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 280.82 $ 311.71 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 30,000 $ 374.16 $ 405.58 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 452.72 $ 489.02 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 6 60,000 $ 464.16 $ 495.58 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 626.72 $ s 668.43 ` $ 6.32 $ 6.50 90,000 $ 561.36 $ 592.78 ! $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 81632 $ 863.44 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 120,000 $ 666.36 $ 697.78 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 1,020.32 $i 1,072.85 $ 7.20 $ 7.38' 150,000 $ 777.66 $ 809.08 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 1,236.32 $' 1,294.26 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 200,000 $ 1,011.16 $ 1,042.58 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 1,689.32 $ 1,756.27 ` $ 10.31 $ 10.49 250,000 $ 1,276.16 $ 1,307.58 - $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 2,204.82 $ 2,280.79 < $ 10.97 $ 11.15 300,000 $ 1,558.16 $ 1,589.58 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 2,753.32 $' 2,838.30 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 350,000+ $ 1,850.66 $ 1,882.08 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 3,320.82 $ 3,414.82' $ 11.60 $ 11.78 4 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 3 IN 0 $ 457.06 $ 507.34 $ 2.95 $ 2`.95 $ 44931 $ 498.73 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 48,000 $ 598.66 $ 64 &94 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 724.35 $ 782.42 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 7 96,000 $ 742.66 $ 792.94 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,002.75 $' 1,069.48 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 144,000 $ 898.18 $ 948.46 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 1,306.11 $ 1,381.49 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 192,000 $ 1,066.18 $ 1,116.46 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 1,632.51 $' 1,716.55' $ 7.20 $ 7.38' 240,000 $ 1,244.26 $ 1,294.54 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 1,978.11 $; 2,070.80 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 320,000 $ 1,617.86 $ 1,668.14 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 2,702.91 $? 2,810.03 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 400,000 $ 2,041.86 $ 2;09214 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 3,527.71 $ 3,649.26 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 480,000 $ 2,493.06 $ 2,543.34 ; $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 4,405.31 $ 4,541.28 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 560,000+ $ 2,961.06 $ 3,011.34 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 5,313.31 $! 5,463.71 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 3 I 0 $ 685.59 $ 761.01 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 673.96 $ 748.09 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 72,000 $ 897.99 $ 97141 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,086.52 $! 1,173.64 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE8 144,000 $ 1,113.99 $ 1,189.41 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,504.12 $ 1,604.22' $ 6.32 $ 6.50 216,000 $ 1,347.27 $ 1 ,422.69 $ 3.50 $ 3.50' $ 1,959.16 $' 2,072.24 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 288,000 $ 1,599.27 $ 1,674.69 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 2,448.76 $ 2,574.82 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 408,000 $ 2,044.47 $ 2;119.89 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 3,312.76 $ 3,460.46 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 528,000 $ 2,604.87 $ 2,680.29 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 4,399.96 $ 4,569.30 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 648,000 $ 3,240.87 $ 3,316.29 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 5,637.16 $' 5,828.14 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 768,000 $ 3,917.67 $ 3,993.09 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 6,953.56 $; 7,166.18 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53 888,000+ $ 4,619.67 $ 4,695.09 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 8,315.56 $' 8,549.81 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 4 I 0 $ 714.16 $ 792.72 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 702.04 $r 779.27 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 75,000 $ 935.41 $ 1;01197 + $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,131.79 $ 1,222.54 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 9 150,000 $ 1,160.41 $ 1;238.97 ? $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,566.79 $ 1,671.06 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 225,000 $ 1,403.41 $ 1,481.97 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 2,040.79 $ 2,158.59 > $ 6.80 $ 6.98 300,000 $ 1,665.91 $ 1,744.47: $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 2,550.79 $ 2,682.11 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 425,000 $ 2,129.66 $ 2,208.22 ` $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 3,450.79 $ 3,604.65 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 550,000 $ 2,713.41 $ 2,791.97 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 4,583.29 $'; 4,759.69 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 675,000 $ 3,375.91 $ 3,454.47 $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 5,872.04 $ 6,070.98 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 800,000 $ 4,080.91 $ 4,159.47 ` $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 7,243.29 $` 7,464.77 - $ 11.35 $ 11.53 925,000+ $ 4,812.16 $ 4,890.72 ` $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 8,662.04 $ 8,906.06 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 4 IN 0 $ 1,199.80 $ 1;331.77 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 1,179.42 $ 1,309.16 s $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 126,000 $ 1,571.50 $ 1,703.47 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,901.40 $ 2,053.86 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 10 252,000 $ 1,949.50 $ 2,081.47 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 2,632.20 $ i 2,807.37 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 378,000 $ 2,357.74 $ 2;48911 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 3,428.52 $ 3,626.41 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 504,000 $ 2,798.74 $ 2;930.71 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 4,285.32 $ 4,505.93 s $ 7.20 $ 7.38 630,000 $ 3,266.20 $ 3;398.17 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 5,192.52 $ 5,435.85 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 840,000 $ 4,246.90 $ 4;378.87 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 7,095.12 $ 7,376.32 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 1,050,000 $ 5,359.90 $ 5;491.87 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 9,260.22 $I' 9,579.29 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 1,260,000 $ 6,544.30 $ 6,676.27 >; $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 11,563.92 $ 11,920.85 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 1,470,000+ $ 7,772.80 $ 7,904.77 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 13,947.42 $ 14,342.22 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 6 IN 0 $ 1,428.33 $ 1,585.44 < $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 1,404.08 $ 1,558.53 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 150,000 $ 1,870.83 $ 2,027.94 ` $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 2,263.58 $i 2,445.08 ? $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 11 300,000 $ 2,320.83 $ 2,477.94 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 3,133.58 $' 3,342.13 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 450,000 $ 2,806.83 $ 2,963.94 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 4,081.58 $ 4,317.17 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 600,000 $ 3,331.83 $ 3,488.94 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 5,101.58 $ 5,364.22 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 750,000 $ 3,888.33 $ 4;045.44 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 6,181.58 $ 6,471.27 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,000,000 $ 5,055.83 $ 5,212.94 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 8,446.58 $' 8,781.35 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.49 1,250,000 $ 6,380.83 $ 6;53294 - $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 11,024.08 $ 11,403.93 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 1,500,000 $ 7,790.83 $ 7,947.94 ` $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 13,766.58 $ 14,191.50 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53' 1,750,000+ $ 9,253.33 $ 9,410.44 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 16,604.08 $l 17,074.08 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 6 IN 0 $ 2,628.11 $ 2;917.20 ; $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 2,583.51 $` 2,583.51 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 276,000 $ 3,442.31 $ 3;731.40 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 4,164.99 $? 4,214.76 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 12 552,000 $ 4,270.31 ! $ 4,559.40 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 5,765.79 $`- 5,865.32 $ 6.32 $ 6.50' 828,000 $ 5,164.55 $ 5,453.64 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 7,510.11 $; 7,659.41 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,104,000 $ 6,130.55 $ 6;419.64 '; $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 9,386.91 $ 9,585.98 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,380,000 $ 7,154.51 $ 7,443.60' $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 11,374.11 $ 11,62294 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,840,000 $ 9,302.71 $ 9,591.80 ! $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 15,541.71 $ 15,873.49 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,300,000 $ 11,740.71 $ 12,029.80 $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 20,284.31 $; 20,699.03 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 2,760,000 $ 14,335.11 ! $ 14;62420 ' $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 25,330.51 $' 25,828.18 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 3,220,000+ $ 17,026.11 $ 17;315.20 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 30,551.51 $ 31,132.12 < $ 11.60 $ 11.78 [8 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 8 IN 0 $ 2,308.51 $ 2;562.44 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 2,269.09 $ 2,269.09 s $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 240,000 $ 3,016.51 $ 3;270.44 - $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3,644.29 $ 3,687.57 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 13 480,000 $ 3,736.51 $ 3,990.44 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 5,036.29 $ 5,122.84 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 720,000 $ 4,514.11 $ 4,768.04 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 6,553.09 $? 6,682.92 ' $ 6.80 $ 6.98 960,000 $ 5,354.11 $ 5,608.04 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 8,185.09 $ 8,358.19 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,200,000 $ 6,244.51 $ 6;498.44 ! $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 9,913.09 $ 10,129.47 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,600,000 $ 8,112.51 $ 8;366.44 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 13,537.09 $' 13,825.59 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,000,000 $ 10,232.51 $ 10,486.44 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 17,661.09 $ 18,021.72 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 2,400,000 $ 12,488.51 $ 12;742.44: $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 22,049.09 $- 22,481.85 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 2,800,000+ $ 14,828.51 $ 15;082.44 ' $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 26,589.09 $' 27,093.97 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 8 IN 0 $ 4,617.01 $ 5,124.88 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 4,538.17 $ 5,037.37 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 480,000 $ 6,033.01 $ 6,540.88 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 7,288.57 $ 7,874.32 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 14 960,000 $ 7,473.01 $ 7,980.88 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 10,072.57 $ 10,744.87 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 1,440,000 $ 9,028.21 $ 9;536.08 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 13,106.17 $ 13,865.02 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,920,000 $ 10,708.21 $ 11;216.08 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 16,370.17 $' 17,215.57 < $ 7.20 $ 7.38 2,400,000 $ 12,489.01 $ 12;996.88 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 19,826.17 $ 20,758.12 ' $ 9.06 $ 9.24 3,200,000 $ 16,225.01 $ 16,732.88 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 27,074.17 $ 28,150.37 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 4,000,000 $ 20,465.01 $ 20;972.88 ' $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 35,322.17 $'; 36,542.63 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 4,800,000 $ 24,977.01 $ 25,484.88 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 44,098.17 $ 45,462.88 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 5,600,000+ $ 31,997.01 $ 32;504.88 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 57,718.17 $ 59,299.26 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 10 IN 0 $ 3,318.47 $ 3,683.51 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 ` $ 3,261.81 $ 3,620.61 $ 5.73 $ ? 5.91 COMPOUND 345,000 $ 4,336.22 $ 4,701.26 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 'i $ 5,238.66 $ 5,659.67 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 15 690,000 $ 5,371.22 $ 5,736.26 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 7,239.66 $ 7,722.88 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 1,035,000 $ 6,489.02 $ 6,854.06 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 9,420.06 $ 9,965.49 < $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,380,000 $ 7,696.52 $ 8;061.56 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 ? $ 11,766.06 $ 12,373.70 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,725,000 $ 8,976.47 $ 9,341.51 ' $ 4.67 i$ 4.67 ! $ 14,250.06 $ 14,919.90 ? $ 9.06 $ 9.24 2,300,000 $ 11,661.72 $ 12,026.76 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 ' $ 19,459.56 $' 20,23109 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,875,000 $ 14,709.22 $ 15,074.26 s $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 25,387.81 $ 26,265.02 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 3,450,000 $ 17,952.22 $ 18,317.26 $ 5.85 $ 5.85' $ 31,695.56 $ 32,676.45 > $ 11.35 $ ' 11.53 4,025,000+ $ 21,315.97 $ 21,681.01 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 38,221.81 $ 39,306.38 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 0 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Water Rates 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 10 IN 0 $ 6,499.16 $ 6,499.16 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 6,770.05 $ 6,770.05 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 750,000 $ 8,711.66 $ 8,711.66 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 11,067.55 $ 11,202.79 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 16 1,500,000 $ 10,961.66 $ 10,961.66 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 15,417.55 $ 15,688.02' $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 2,250,000 $ 13,391.66 $ 13,391.66 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 20,157.55 $ 20,563.26 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 3,000,000 $ 16,016.66 $ 16,016.66 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 25,257.55 $ 25,798.49 ? $ 7.20 $ 7.38 3,750,000 $ 18,799.16 $ 18,799.16 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 30,657.55 $i 31,333.73 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 5,000,000 $ 24,636.66 ! $ 24,636.66 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 41,982.55 $` 42,884.12 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 6,250,000 $ 31,261.66 $ 31,261.66 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 54,870.05 $ 55,997.02 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 7,500,000 $ 38,311.66 $ 38 311.66 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 68,582.55 $; 69,934.91 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 8,750,000+ $ 45,624.16 ! $ 45,624.16 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 82,770.05 $ 84,347.80 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 12 IN 0 $ 9,522.58 $ 10,570.07 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 9,359.97 $ 9,359.97 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 990,000 $ 12,443.08 $ 13,490.57 $ 3.00 '$ 3.00 $ 15,032.67 $' 15,211.18 ' $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 17 1,980,000 $ 15,413.08 $ 16;460.57 < $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 20,774.67 $' 21,131.69 +? $ 6.32 $ 6.50 2,970,000 $ 18,620.68 $ 19,668.17 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 27,031.47 $ 27,567.00 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 3,960,000 $ 22,085.68 ! $ 23,133.17 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 ' $ 33,76147 $' 34,477.52 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 4,950,000 $ 25,758.58 $ 26,806.07 < $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 40,891.47 $' 41,784.03 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 6,600,000 $ 33,464.08 $ 34,511.57 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 55,840.47 $ 57,030.55 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.49 8,250,000 $ 42,209.08 $ 43,256.57 ? $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 72,851.97 $' 74,339.57 ' $ 10.97 $ 11.15 9,900,000 $ 51,515.08 $ 52,562.57' $ 5.85 $ 5.85 - $ 90,952.47 $s 92,737.59 > $ 11.35 $ 11.53 11,550,000+ $ 61,167.58 $ 62,215.07 < $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 109,679.97 $'- 111,762.60 ` $ 11.60 $ 11.78 CURRENT RATE 1000 RATE 1000 FH METER 122.30 135.75 8.47 9..40 1.1 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Summary of Changes Impact Fees 1 2015 -16 2016 -17 2018 -19 LUEs Meter Size Meter Type Water 5/8" SIMPLE 1.0 $ 2,934 $ 2,934 $ 2,934 3/4" SIMPLE 1.5 $ 4,401 $ 4,401 $ 4,401 1" SIMPLE 2.5 $ 7,335 $ 7,335 $ 7,335 1.5" SIMPLE 5.0 $ 14,670 $ 14,670 $ 14,670 2" SIMPLE 8.0 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 2" COMPOUND 8.0 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 2" TURBINE 10.0 $ 29,340 $ 29,340 $ 29,340 3" COMPOUND 16.0 $ 46,944 $ 46,944 $ 46,944 3" TURBINE 24.0 $ 70,416 $ 70,416 $ 70,416 4" COMPOUND 25.0 $ 73,350 $ 73,350 $ 73,350 4" TURBINE 42.0 $ 123,228 $ 123,228 $ 123,228 6" COMPOUND 50.0 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 6" TURBINE 92.0 $ 269,928 $ 269,928 $ 269,928 8" COMPOUND 80.0 $ 234,720 $ 234,720 $ 234,720 9" TURBINE 160.0 $ 469,440 $ 469,440 $ 469,440 10" COMPOUND 115.0 $ 337,410 $ 337,410 $ 337,410 10" TURBINE 250.0 $ 733,500 $ 733,500 $ 733,500 12" TURBINE 330.0 $ 968,220 $ 968,220 $ 968,220 SEWER COLLECTION IMPACT FEE *Collection Impact Fee Per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE) *Sewer based on LUE: LUE = 245 gallons per day These are only City of Schertz impact fees. Other Utility Impact Fees *Treatment Impact Fee Per LUE: Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Example by meter size: 5/8" Simple ROADWAY IMAPACT FEE Residential Home Nonresidential, per service unit* *The number of service units are based on the use of the property. A fee calculator is available on the City Website under the Engineering page $ 1,668 $ 1,668 $ 1,668 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $1,306.00 $1,306.00 $ 1,607.24 N/A $2,022.00 $ 2,022.00 N/A $ 100.00 $ 100.00 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees All Departments 2018 -19 Records Requests Standard paper copy, per page $ 0.10 (front and back is 2 pages) Nonstandard -size copy: Oversize paper copy (11" X 17 ") $ 0.50 Specialty paper (Mylar, blueprint, blue line, map, photographic) Actual Certified Copy- Each Certification $ 5.00 Diskette $ 1.00 Magnetic tape - actual cost Actual Data cartridge - actual cost Actual Tape cartridge - actual cost Actual Rewritable CD (CD -RW) $ 1.00 Non - rewritable CD (CD -R) $ 1.00 Digital video disc (DVD) $ 3.00 JAZ drive - actual cost Actual Other electronic media - actual cost Actual Miscellaneous supplies - actual cost Actual Postage and shipping charge actual cost Actual Photographs - actual cost Actual Maps - actual cost Actual Labor charge: For locating, compiling, and $ 16.00 reproducing, per hour (if documents are NOT located in the immediate area and over 50 pages) Overhead charge - % of labor charge 120% Remote document retrieval charge Actual No Sales Tax shall be applied to copies of public information Notary Fees Acknowledgement, Certified Copies, Jurat's, Oaths and Affirmation $ 6.00 Protests- Per Document $ 5.00 Convenience Fees Credit Card Payment Over Phone Return Check Fee $ 1.00 10 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees City Secretary 2018 -19 Candidate Filing Fee $ 25.00 Licenses Package Store $ 250.00 Package Store Tasing $ 12.50 Wine & Beer Retailers $ 87.50 Wine & Beer Retailers - Off premises $ 30.00 Late Hours $ 125.00 Beer on Premises $ 75.00 Wine Only - Package Store $ 37.50 Mix Beverage Permit $ 375.00 Mix Beverage Late Hours $ 75.00 Caterer's Permit $ 250.00 Retail Dealer On- Premises - Late Hours $ 125.00 Local Cartage $ 15.00 11 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees lWireless 1 2018 -191 Network Nodes Application Fee, for up to 5 nodes $ 500.00 additional for each node over 5 on the application $ 250.00 Annual Public Right of Way Fee $ 250.00 Node Support Pole Application Fee $1,000.00 Colocation Fee for Network Nodes on City Service Poles, per pole $ 20.00 Transport Facilities Application Fee, for up to 5 nodes $ 500.00 additional for each node over 5 on the application $ 250.00 Rental Fee for Transport Facilities, per device per month, not to exceed the aggregate "per node" fee $ 28.00 12 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Library 2018 -19 Non- Resident user fee- Library Card $ 15.00 Meeting Room Fee- Non- Schertz residents, 4 hours $ 50.00 Meeting Room Fee- After hour fee, per hour $ 25.00 Meeting Room Cleaning Fee (Spot Cleaning) $ 50.00 Meeting Room Cleaning Fee (Whole Room) Actual Additional Fee for After Hours Cleaning, per hour $ 25.00 Inter - Library Loans Materials (ILL Materials) Lost or damaged ILL items - Cost of item as billed by the lending library (may include additional fines or fees assessed by the lending library) Inter - Library Loan items per day (3 day grace period) Max overdue amount per ILL item Return Postage Fee - -for ILL items never picked up by customer after arrival Overdue Fines (3 day grace period) All Items per day (except ILL items) Max amount that can be charged Replacement Library Card Copier, per standard page (2 -sided copies are the same as 2 pages; oversized copies are the same as 2 pages) Printing, per standard page (2 -sided copies are the same as 2 pages; oversized copies are the same as 2 pages) Black and White Color Outgoing Fax, 1st page Per each succeeding page Lost & Damaged Materials - Cost of item plus a processing fee Damaged DVD Case or Video Case Damaged or Missing Barcode Damaged or Missing RFID Tag Damaged or Missing DVD/Video Cover (if replaceable) plus processing fee Toddler Tote Bag Juvenile Audiobook Bag Materials Recovery Fee (per account sent to collections) Note: If an item is lost and paid for, any overdue fines assessed against the item are waived. If part of an item is lost, the item as a whole is considered lost and the full cost of the item is charged to the patron. Again, any overdue fines assessed against the item are waived if the item is paid for. Refunds for items that were paid for and subsequently found and returned to the library are available for up to 60 days after payment and require the original receipt. Processing fees are non - refundable. No refunds will be given after 60 days. Actual $ 1.00 $ 5.00 $ 3.00 $ 0.25 $ 1.00 $ 5.00 $ 0.15 $ 0.15 $ 0.50 $ 1.00 $ 0.25 $ 2.50 $ 5.00 $ 10.00 13 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Schertz Magazine 1 2018 -19 Display Ads: Eighth Page for 6 mo., per month $ 300.00 Eighth Page for 12 mo., per month $ 275.00 Quarter Page for 6 mo., per month $ 550.00 Quarter Page for 12 mo., per month $ 400.00 Half Page for 6 mo., per month $ 1,000.00 Half Page for 12 mo., per month $ 700.00 Full Page for 6 mo., per month $ 1,500.00 Full Page for 12 mo., per month $ 1,200.00 Premium Placement: Back Cover for 6 mo., per month $ 2,500.00 Back Cover for 12 mo., per month $ 2,200.00 Churches, governmental entities, 501 (c) 3 and civic groups who provide a service to the residents of Schertz will receive a 25% discount on the above facility rental rates. 14 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Event Facilities 2018 -19 Vendor /Ancillary Fees Kitchen Fee, Ball Room $ 200.00 Kitchen Fee, Bluebonnet Room $ 75.00 Early Open Fee (prior to normal scheduled hours), per staff member per hour $ 25.00 Ice, one bin (80lbs) $ 15.00 Ice, unlimited $ 25.00 Beverage Service $ 50.00 Cancellation Fee $ 50.00 Portable Bar (includes 5 cocktail tables) $ 200.00 Discount /Special Rates Frequent Renters 25% discount (Must rent at least 12 times calendar year) Multiple Day Renters 25% discount (Must rent two or more consecutive days) Day before setup - 50% of regular room rate Non - Profits 25% discount - rent only All comp'd requests will require approval from City Manager Sweetheart Tickets- Pre sale $ 10.00 Sweetheart Tickets - Night Of $ 15.00 N.O.A. Meeting Fee $ 75.00 Funeral Reception Only in Bluebonnet Hall /Community Centers 3 hr maximum $ 75.00 Quality of Life Events ( Community Centers Only) $ 15.00 Facility Security Security Coordination Fee $ 15.00 Regular- per officer, per hour (4 hour minimum) $ 30.00 Holiday- per officer, per hour (4 hour minimum) $ 50.00 Civic Center - Grand Ballroom- (7,198 sq. ft) Regular Rentals Friday and Sunday, Full day $ 800.00 Friday and Sunday, Half day $ 450.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 600.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 375.00 Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 1,800.00 Small Stage $ 200.00 Large Stage $ 400.00 Dance Floor $ 200.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 500.00 Audio/Visual Services (contracted) $ 175.00 Additional time, per hour $ 50.00 Audio/Visual Panel Access $ 75.00 Banquet Package - includes hall rental,easel, tables /chairs, dance floor, AV panel access, ice, $ Gathering Room, Portable Bar, cocktail tables, kitchen: Friday and Sunday, Full day $ 1,500.00 Friday and Sunday, Half day $ 950.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 1,300.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 875.00 Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 2,500.00 Civic Center Cut -Off Hall (Larger portion of Ballroom - (4,172 sq ft) Regular Rentals Sunday, Full day $ 600.00 Sunday, Half day $ 325.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 425.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 250.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 1,400.00 Small Stage $ 200.00 Large Stage $ 400.00 Dance Floor $ 200.00 Audiovisual Services for 4 hours (Both rooms) $ 175.00 15 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Event Facilities 2018 -19 Additional time, per hour $ 50.00 AudioNisual Panel Access $ 75.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 500.00 Banquet Package - includes hall rental,easel, tables /chairs, dance floor, AV panel access, ice, Monday - Thursday, Half day Gathering Room, Portable Bar /cocktail tables, Kitchen Fee: 175.00 Sunday, Full day $ 1,300.00 Sunday, Half day $ 825.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 1,125.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 750.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 2,100.00 Civic Center Conference Hall (Smaller portion of Ballroom - (3,026 sq ft) Regular Rentals Sunday, Full day $ 400.00 Sunday, Half day $ 250.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 250.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 175.00 Audiovisual Access $ 25.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 200.00 Civic Center - Bluebonnet Hall- (2,500 sq ft) Regular Rentals Sunday, Full day $ 400.00 Sunday, Half day $ 200.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 250.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 125.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 600.00 Kitchen $ 75.00 Audiovisual Access $ 50.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 200.00 Banquet Package - includes hall rental, tables /chairs, AV panel access, ice, kitchen: Sunday, Full day $ 525.00 Sunday, Half day $ 325.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 375.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 250.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 725.00 Community Center North- 3501 Morning Dr- (2,006 sq ft) Sunday, Full day $ 200.00 Sunday, Half day $ 125.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 150.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 100.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 300.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 200.00 Community Center Central Sunday, Full day $ 250.00 Sunday, Half day $ 150.00 Monday - Thursday, Full day $ 150.00 Monday - Thursday, Half day $ 100.00 Friday - Saturday, Full day (half day not available) $ 400.00 Projector /Screen /Microphone $ 50.00 Damage /Cancellation Deposit $ 200.00 Churches, governmental entities, 501 (c) 3 and civic groups who provide a service to the residents of Schertz will receive a 25% discount on the above facility rental rates. 16 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Event Fee 2018 -19 Jubilee $ 200.00 Food Vendor $ 500.00 Beverage Vendor $ 300.00 Cooler Booth Rental $ 1,500.00 Carnival $ 6,000.00 Craft Vendor $ 50.00 Business Vendor $ 200.00 Parade Entry $ 35.00 SchertzQ Food Truck Vendor $ 200.00 Beverage Vendor $ 100.00 Cooler Booth Rental $ 1,000.00 Jackpot Beans $ 25.00 BBQ Entry $ 200.00 Cooks Choice $ 25.00 Retail /Craft $ 100.00 Business Vendor $ 200.00 Ice $ 3.00 Kids Q $ 25.00 Festival of Angels Food Vendor $ 50.00 Craft Vendor $ 50.00 Parade Entry $ 15.00 17 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Parks and Recreation 2018 -19 Pavilion Rental Rates - Small Pavilion Schertz Residents Rental Fee (6am -2pm) or (3pm -11 pm) $ 55.00 Rental Fee all day $ 85.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates Non - Schertz Residents Rental Fee (6am -2pm) or (3pm -11 pm) $ 90.00 Rental Fee all day $ 135.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates Pavilion Rental Rates - Large Pavilion Schertz Residents WITHOUT KITCHEN Rental Fee $ 100.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates WITH KITCHEN /RESTROOMS Rental Fee $ 200.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates Damage Deposit $ 200.00 Non - Schertz Residents WITHOUT KITCHEN Rental Fee $ 150.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates WITH KITCHEN /RESTROOMS Rental Fee $ 300.00 Monday - Thrusday 50% discount on rates Damage Deposit $ 200.00 18 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Parks and Recreation 2018 -19 Pools Daily Rates Per swimmer per entry $ 2.00 Daily pass $ 3.00 Admission is free for children under the age of 2 years. Season Rates - Maximum per season pass is six (6) members Schertz Residents Individual rate $ 40.00 2 member rate $ 50.00 3 member rate $ 60.00 4 member rate $ 70.00 5 member rate $ 80.00 6 member rate $ 90.00 Non- Schertz Residents Individual rate $ 70.00 2 member rate $ 80.00 3 member rate $ 90.00 4 member rate $ 100.00 5 member rate $ 110.00 6 member rate $ 120.00 Regular Preschool /Child Care Center Teacher /Child Care Attendant and 5 students per pass. In City $ 80.00 Out of City $ 120.00 19 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Parks and Recreation 1 2018 -19 * *THESE RATES NOW SET BY CONTRACTOR ** Swimming lessons rate Schertz Residents - per child ** Non- Residents - per child ** Pool Reservations Schertz Residents 1 to 50 People ** 51 to 100 People ** 101 to 150 People ** 151 to 200 People ** 201 to 250 People ** 251 to 293 People ** Non - Residents 1 to 50 People ** 51 to 100 People ** 101 to 150 People ** 151 to 200 People ** 201 to 250 People ** 251 to 293 People ** Northcliffe Pool Schertz Residents 1 to 50 People (2 hours maximum) ** 50 to 100 People (2 hours maximum) ** Non - Residents 1 to 50 People (2 hours maximum) ** 50 to 100 People (2 hours maximum) ** * *THESE RATES NOW SET BY CONTRACTOR ** 20 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Animal Services $ 2018 -19 Pet License $ 90.00 Standard fee, $ 5.00 license per year per spayed or neutered animal $ 131.50 Standard fee, $ 10.00 license per year per un- spayed or un- neutered animal $ 137.00 Replacement tags (if lost) $ 2.00 Animal Adoption Cat or Dog that has been spayed or neutered regardless of weight $ 65.00 Cat, male $ 90.00 Cat, female $ 113.50 Dog, male under 60 lbs. $ 131.50 Dog, male 60 lbs. and over $ 140.00 Dog, female under 30 lbs. $ 137.00 Dog, female between 30 and 60 lbs. $ 142.50 Dog, female 61 lbs. and over $ 159.00 Permits - A permit shall be issue after payment of application fee: Kennel authorized to house 10 or less dogs or cats $ 75.00 Kennel authorized to house more than 10 but less than 50 $ 150.00 Kennel authorized to house 50 or more $ 200.00 Pet Shop $ 100.00 Grooming Shop $ 30.00 Commercial Riding Stable 10 or less $ 75.00 Commercial Riding Stable 11 -50 $ 150.00 Commercial Riding Stable 51 or more $ 200.00 Annual Crescent Bend Riding Permit, per horse $ 100.00 Auction $ 100.00 Zoological Park $ 200.00 Animal Exhibition /Circus /Petting Zoo $ 100.00 Guard Dog Training Center $ 200.00 Obedience Training Center $ 50.00 Commercial Establishment Using a Guard Dog $ 75.00 Commercial Annual Sellers Permit $ 150.00 Dangerous Dog Permit $ 200.00 Temporary Permit* - not to exceed 7 days $ 15.00 *Good for Crescent Bend Riding (per horse), Animal Exhibition /Circus /Petting Zoo, and Auction $ Permits Base- Un- neutered Temporary Animal Sales Permit (Pet Expos), not to exceed 3 days $ 30.00 Impoundment Fee: An impoundment fee must be paid for each captured animal Dog /Cat Impoundment Within a 1 year period 1 st Offense Neutered $ 30.00 Un- neutered $ 45.00 2nd Offense Neutered $ 50.00 Un- neutered $ 70.00 3rd Offense Neutered $ 100.00 Un- neutered $ 120.00 4th Offense Neutered $ 150.00 Un- neutered $ 170.00 Each Additional Offense Base- Neutered $ 150.00 Base- Un- neutered $ 170.00 Per Additional Offense $ 50.00 Fowl or other small animal $ 30.00 Livestock $ 75.00 Zoological /Circus animal $ 200.00 21 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees jAnimal Services $ 2018 -19� Boarding Fee: A boarding fee must be paid for each animal $ 35.00 Dog /Cat, per day $ 15.00 Fowl or other small animal, per day $ 10.00 Reptile, per day $ 30.00 Livestock, per day $ 50.00 Zoological/Circus animal, per day $ 200.00 Surrender Fee: Charge per animal with proof of Schertz residency Fowl /Reptile /Small Animal $ 10.00 Dog /Cat neutered /spayed /current rabies cert. /heartworm negative $ 35.00 Dog /Cat all other surrenders $ 65.00 Small Livestock $ 50.00 Large Livestock $ 100.00 Zoological or Circus $ 200.00 Litter Fee (3 or more animals under 2 months old) $ 75.00 Quarantine Fee: Dog /Cat $ 50.00 Plus Daily Charge per animal for boarding $ 15.00 Micro Chipping $ 15.00 Trap Rental Fee: Trap Deposit, refundable when trap is returned $ 75.00 Trap Rental Fee, per day $ 5.00 22 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Marshal Service 2018 -19 Health Division Food Establishment Fees: Non - Profit Organizations (regardless of number of employees) $ 100.00 1 -3 Employees $ 150.00 4 -6 Employees $ 285.00 7 -10 Employees $ 540.00 11 -20 Employees $ 575.00 21+ Employees $ 725.00 Temporary Food and/or Beverage Establishment $ 50.00 Mobile Vendors $ 150.00 Public and HOA Swimming Pool License $ 110.00 Foster Care $ 50.00 Re- inspection fees $ 75.00 City Code Violation Court Fee $ 10.00 Nuisance Abatement Administrative Fee $ 100.00 *Any citation issued by individuals defined in Section 22 -40 (Authority to issue notice of violations), shall be able to collect a dismisal fee from an individual who abates such violation upon their court appearance. Judge Stephen Takas suggested that we charge a dismisal fee to remedy some of the expenses incurred from the issuance of such citation. Sanitation Inspection Fees - Outside of City Hourly Charge, one hour minimum Mileage over 15 miles, per mile Administrative Fee $ 50.00 $ 5.00 115% 23 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Police Department 2018 79 Alarm Permit Fees $ 150.00 Residential - Annually $ 10.00 Tier 1 Commercial $ 25.00 Tier 2 Commercial site alarm system required $ 50.00 under local, state or national code $ 500.00 Alarm Service Fees: Other than Burglar Alarms 4TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 100.00 5TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 150.00 6TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 200.00 7TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 250.00 8TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 500.00 Others After 8TH within 12 Mo. Period $ 500.00 Burglar Alarm Service Fees: 4TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 50.00 5TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 50.00 6TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 75.00 7TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 75.00 8TH False Alarm within 12 Mo. Period $ 100.00 Others After 8TH within 12 Mo. Period $ 100.00 Miscellaneous Fees Accident Reports, each $ 6.00 Fingerprints, per set $ 10.00 Solicitor /Peddler Permit $ 50.00 Background Check Fee $ 10.00 BODY CAM VIDEO ($1.00 per minute +$10.00) $ 10.00 24 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Fire Department and Haz -Mat Fees 2018 -15 Permit Fee Schedule $ Certificate of Occupancy - Inspections $ 50.00 License Inspections $ 50.00 Base Fire Suppression System Installation $ 100.00 Additional installation charge, per sprinkler head $ 1.00 Base Fire Alarms Installation $ 100.00 Additional installation charge, per initiating or notification device $ 1.00 Re- Inspection $ 45.00 Smoke Control System Plan (for each review) $ 75.00 Flammable or combustible liquid tanks, each review $ 150.00 Flammable or combustible gas tanks, each review $ 150.00 After hours fee, per hour per inspector $ 60.00 (beyond the hours of 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) $ Plan Review Fees, construction per hour $ 50.00 Plan Review Rush, Outsource - Sent out by Fire Marshal Cost SFR After Hours Plan Review Rush (per hour, 2 hour minimum) $ 65.00 Fireworks display permit $ 250.00 Operational Permits Open or Control Burn - Commercial $ 150.00 Open or Control Burn - Non - commercial $ 25.00 Tents $ 50.00 Cutting and Welding $ 50.00 Explosives $ 50.00 Flammable Storage $ 50.00 Carnivals and Fairs $ 50.00 Food Booth (per booth, per event) $ 25.00 Mobile Food Establistments (annual) $ 25.00 Battery Systems $ 50.00 Combustible Dust Product Options $ 50.00 Cryogenic Fluids $ 50.00 Haz -mat $ 50.00 Lumberyards $ 50.00 Spraying and Dipping $ 50.00 Storage of Tires $ 50.00 Operation Charges Hazardous materials operations service fees. The current replacement cost shall be charged for the use of consumable haz -mat supplies and firefighting agents ACTUAL If any protective equipment or firefighting equipment is damaged or contaminated, the current replacement cost shall be charged. ACTUAL Personnel cost will be calculated at the rate for the responding crew members. ACTUAL Fire Watch Fee, cost based on weighted salary of disptached employee ACTUAL 25 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees EMS 2018 -19 Response Services Ambulance Standby, per hour Aid Call $ 200.00 Air Medical Assist Call $ 700.00 BLS Non- Emergency $1,090.00 BLS Emergency $1,210.00 AILS Non Emergency $1,230.00 AILS Emergency No Specialty Care $1,440.00 AILS Emergency W \ Specialty Care $1,600.00 Mileage, per mile $ 20.00 Other Services Ambulance Standby, per hour $ 125.00 Gator Standby, per hour $ 95.00 AED Supplies Actual CPR Class and Supplies Actual System Continuing Education Actual Vaccinations Actual EMT Class $1,100.00 Passport to Care - Single (insured) $ 50.00 Passport to Care - Family (insured) $ 60.00 Passport to Care - Single (Not insured) $ 65.00 Passport to Care - Family (Not insured) $ 75.00 26 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees (Planning and Zoning $ 2018 -19� Plat recording service: $ 1,000.00 Fees assessed are due prior to recording: $ 2,000.00 Plat recording fee is equal to the fee charged by the County Clerks Office $ 3,500.00 Annexation Petition by Property Owner - Plus all related fees $ 750.00 Zone Change $ 6,000.00 Zone change for 0 to 2 acres $ 650.00 Zone change for 2+ to 5 acres $ 1,000.00 Zone change for 5+ to 20 acres $ 2,000.00 Zone change for 20+ to 50 acres $ 3,500.00 Zone change for 50+ to 100 acres $ 4,000.00 Zone change for 100+ acres $ 6,000.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) - plus other applicable items (i.e. Site Plan) Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 0 to 2 acres $ 650.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 2+ to 5 acres $ 1,000.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 5+ to 20 acres $ 2,000.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 20+ to 50 acres $ 3,500.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 50+ to 100 acres $ 4,000.00 Specific Use Permit (SUP) for 100+ acres $ 6,000.00 Building addition of a current /legal SUP $ 500.00 Master Development Plan All phased developments and PDD's $ 1,500.00 Master Development Plan Amendment (minor revision) $ 500.00 Preliminary Plat 0 to 50 acres $ 2,000.00 greater than 50 acres $ 3,000.00 Final Record Plat or Re -plat 0 to 50 acres $ 1,500.00 greater than 50 acres $ 2,000.00 Revised Final Plat (minor) $ 500.00 Amended Plat $ 1,500.00 Minor Plat $ 1,500.00 Vacate Plat $ 1,500.00 Plat Time Extension - plus all related fees $ 250.00 Street and Subdivision Name Changes $ 1,500.00 27 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees (Planning and Zoning 2018 -19� Site Plan $ 1,500.00 Amended Site Plan (minor) $ 500.00 Park Fees - Residential Land Dedication: one (1) acre per 100 dwelling unit Fee in Lieu of Land Dedication: per dwelling unit $ 350.00 Park Development Fee: Per Dwelling unit $ 650.00 Park Fees - Multi- Family Land Dedication: one (1) acre per 100 dwelling unit Fee in Lieu of Land Dedication; per dwelling unit: $ 350.00 Park Development Fee: Per Dwelling unit $ 650.00 Miscellaneous Tree Mitigation, inch of DBH - Plus all related fees $ 100.00 Legal Review (i.e. Improvement Agreements) Actual Zoning Verification Letter - Single tract of land per Tract $ 150.00 Certificate of Determination - Single Tract of Land per Tract $ 150.00 Postponement of any Public Hearing by the Applicant $ 350.00 Appeals and requests for amendments Considered by City Council, the Planning & Zoning Commission, the Building and Standards Commission, or the Board of Adjustment as allowed by the Unified Development Code: $ 750.00 Variance and/or Waivers Unified Development Code, ea. $ 500.00 Building Code, ea. $ 500.00 Driveway width waiver requests will not be assessed with the waiver fee Copies, Plans, and Maps: Unified Development Code $ 50.00 Public Works Specification Manual $ 50.00 Staff Review - Application completeness review, internal SDR (staff) review & meeting with applicant to review application package. Fee included in all applications. 28 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Inspections 1 2018 -19 Building Permit Fees New Construction Per Square Foot - Residential $ 75.00 New Construction - Commercial Cost Review of Projects and Construction Plans with a cost of $5,000 or greater, as % of Permit Fee 50% All plan review fees that follow are subject to a 15% administrative fee Drainage Plan Review, per hour (2 hour minimum) $ 100.00 Preliminary Plan Review, per hour (2 hour minimum) $ 100.00 Irrigation Plan Review, per hour (2 hour minimum) $ 100.00 Additional Plan Review (ie Revised), per hour (1 hour minimum) $ 100.00 Commercial /Civil Express Plan Review, per hour (2 hour minimum)* TBD Commercial /Civil Outsource Plan Review* Actual *Deposit Required Construction beginning without permit, pay additional: $ 200.00 Failure to Request Inspection, per trade $ 100.00 Failure to Obtain Contractors License /Provide Insurance $ 100.00 Permit Fees: Cost of Construction (Cost) $0.00 to $1,000.00 $ 50.00 $1,001.00 to $15,000.00, for each additional $1,000 and fraction thereof $ 8.00 $15,001.00 to $50,000.00, for each additional $1,000 and fraction thereof $ 7.00 $50,001 and up, for each additional $1,000 and fraction thereof $ 6.00 Following Use The Cost of Construction (Cost) Table: Flatwork /Deck Cost Accessory Buildings Cost Patio /Patio Cover Cost Roof Replacement Cost With a Roof Replacement No Charge for Solar Panel Reinstallation Permit Window Replacement Cost Swimming Pools in Ground Cost Sign Cost Foundation Repair Cost Fence (New and Replacement) $ 50.00 Siding /Fascia $ 75.00 Gutters $ 50.00 Temporary Building or Structure $ 50.00 Moving Permit Fee $ 100.00 Demolition Permit Fee $ 60.00 Mobile Home Permit Fee (plus sub - trades as necessary) $ 25.00 Certificate of Occupancy $ 50.00 Pre Certificate of Occupancy Inspection $ 200.00 Failure to Obtain Certificate of Occupancy $ 200.00 Compliance Inspection, each trade $ 50.00 Temporary Sign $ 30.00 Development Sign $ 100.00 Banner $ 25.00 Street Span Banner $ 25.00 Home Occupation Permit (annually) $ 35.00 Electrical Permit Fees Electrical Repair /Replacement $ 60.00 New Construction per building /unit $ 100.00 m City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Inspections 1 2018 -19 Mechanical Permit Fees Mechanical Repair /Replacement New Construction per building /unit Plumbing Permit Fees Plumbing Repair /Replacement New Construction per building /unit Lead Solder Test Irrigation Permit Fees Permit Fee plus per sprinkler head plus per backflow or RPZ subsequent to the installation of the piping or equipment served, each Re- Inspection Fees Each re- inspection, per trade Re- inspections after first, per trade NOTE: if re- inspection has been called for and the second inspection revealed the original turn down items have not been corrected in part or whole, in addition to the above fees, a seventy -two (72) hour notice of inspection shall be required before another re- inspection will be conducted No permit fees will be charged for sites located on Main St. (All departments) $ 60.00 $ 100.00 $ 60.00 $ 100.00 $ 15.00 $ 60.00 $ 1.00 $ 3.00 $ 75.00 $ 100.00 C City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Inspections 1 2018 -19 Licenses /Registrations: General Contractor (Initial) $ 150.00 General Contractor (Renewal) $ 100.00 Master Electrician (Initial) State of Texas Issued N/C Journeyman Electrician (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Apprentice/Wireman Electrician (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Mechanical Contractor (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Plumbing Contractor (Annually)* State of Texas Issued N/C Irrigation (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Backflow Tester - State of Texas Issued N/C Sign Contractor (Initial) $ 50.00 Sign Contractor (Renewal) $ 40.00 Electrical Sign Contractor (Initial) State of Texas Issued N/C Electric Sign Journeyman Electrician (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Electric Sign Apprentice /Wireman Electrician (Annually) State of Texas Issued N/C Utility Contractor (Annually) $ 50.00 Mobile Home Park (Annually) $ 40.00 *N /C - No Charge for license per state law Miscellaneous Fees Street Name Change on Permit $ 30.00 Address Corrections $ 30.00 Notary Public $ 6.00 For any item not specifically included in the preceding schedule, the Development Services Department shall establish a fee consistent with the level of work and necessary inspections established by the schedule and the applicant shall be advised accordingly. KE City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Engineering 2018 -19 Grading and Clearing Permit - Acreage For non - agricultural purposes Below 5 acres $ 100.00 5 to 20 acres $ 250.00 Per acre over 20, plus base charge for 20 acres $ 3.00 Over 100 acres $ 490.00 Development Permit % of total valuation of public infrastructure improvements 1 % Reinspection Fee $ 51.00 Grading and Clearing Permit Fees are waived for applicants representing Home Owner's Associations proposing maintenance activities in drainage easements. 32 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Drainage Fees 2018 -19 Charge Per Residence $ 5.20 Commercial, per SUE $ 5.20 Floodplain Permit $ 20.00 33 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Streets 1 2018 -191 Chipping charges, per half hour $ 40.00 Garbage Collection Fees 1 2018 -19 Residential: $ 27.08 Zone I: Once a week pick up One 96 gallon cart provided by franchisee, per month $ 12.41 Residents requesets 2 carts total: $ 18.59 Resident requests 3 carts total: $ 24.80 Resident requests 4 carts total: $ 30.99 Recycling Fee, per month /container $ 2.05 Zone 2: Single Family, twice per week pick up, per month, no cart provided $ 12.41 Recycling Fee, per month /container $ 2.05 Front Porch Pick Up $ 18.11 Recycling Fee, per month /container $ 2.05 Special Pickup: Move Ins, Special Tree Trimmings, oversize $ 17.29 materials, & similar circumstances; minimum Class 11: Mobile Home Parks $ 9.90 Mobile Home Parks (2 or more mobile homes) (based on number in park on the 15th day of the month), per unit/monthly Class 111: Apartments $ 9.90 per unit /monthly Class IV: Motels $ 4.37 per unit/monthly 2. Commercial Class V: $ 15.70 Offices, barber shops and Professional services, per month Class VI: $ 27.08 Light retail, wholesale, commercial or industrial, 2000 to 4000 square feet and excluding large grocery stores, etc., per month Class VII: $ 39.34 Medium retail, wholesale commercial or industrial (2000 to 4000 square feet and exclude large grocery store, etc.), per month 2 Cart, 1 pickup per week $ 40.61 34 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Garbage Collection Fees 1 2018 -19 Class VIII: Heavy Volume retail wholesale, commercial, or industrial (placement determined by a time and cost study of refuse generation and collection. The categories in this class usually require hand loading from rooms or pens and would not apply when commercial containers are used.) A. Two weekly pickups of 1.5 cubic yard containers, excluding large grocery, furniture or department stores, per month $ 69.89 B. Two weekly pickups of 3 cu. Yard containers, excluding large grocery, furniture or department stores, etc., per month $ 139.77 C. Three weekly pickups of 3 cu. Yard containers, excluding large grocery, furniture or department stores, etc., per month $ 218.41 D. Four weekly pickups of 4 cu. Yard containers, including large grocery, furniture or department stores, etc., per month $ 262.05 E. Five weekly pickups of 4 cu. Yard containers, including large grocery, furniture or department stores, etc., per month $ 349.42 F. Six weekly pickups of 4 cu. Yard containers, including large grocery, furniture or department stores, etc., per month $ 436.84 G. Customer requiring more than four (4) cu. Yds each pickup would be charged per cu. Yds. Collected., per yard $ 4.84 35 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees lGarbage Collection Fees 1 2018 -191 3. Commercial Containers. CONTRACTOR will provide commercial containers to those customers who desire to use them in lieu of garbage cans. The use of such CONTRACTOR provided containers is required by this contract. Rates for containers and pickup will be based on the following table: Container Size: Frequency of Pickup 2017 - 1812018 -19 1 2 3 4 5 6 2 cu. Yard $ 59.45 $ 101.23 $ 122.28 $ 139.79 $157.26 $ 174.72 3 cu. Yard $ 71.65 $ 129.26 $ 178.23 $ 204.38 $ 230.63 $ 256.82 4 cu. Yard $ 89.06 $ 153.79 $ 209.65 $ 253.32 $ 297.04 $ 340.71 6 cu. Yard $ 125.84 $ 209.65 $ 288.30 $ 366.95 $445.49 $ 524.14 8 cu. Yard $ 148.53 $ 270.81 $ 375.60 $ 480.46 $ 586.04 $ 690.14 10 cu. Yard $ 171.19 $ 314.45 $ 445.49 $ 559.12 $ 672.64 $ 786.19 Commercial Recycle Hauling Permit $2,500.00 36 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees lGarbage Collection Fees 1 2018 -191 4. Roll -Off Rates Per Pull Open Top Containers - Dry Material 20 cu. Yard $ 323.20 30 cu. Yard $ 384.34 40 cu. Yard $ 445.49 Roll -off Rental (no pulls within billing cycle) $ 133.65 per container per month Collection and Disposal of Municipal Wastes 5. Wet Material Rates on Compactor containers or open top containers with wet material must be negotiated with customers at the time they are needed. This type of waste must be hauled to a Type I landfill which generally has a higher disposal rate attached to it. Roll -off Container Delivery Charge per container $ 38.95 Roll -off Relocation or Trip Charge per container $ 38.95 2 cu. Yard compactor, per month (2 services per week) $ 230.27 Extra pick ups (2 yard compactor), each $ 87.31 4 cu. Yard compactor, per month (2 services per week) $ 474.39 30 cu yard Compactor, per pull $ 585.30 40 cu yard Compactor, per pull $ 695.37 30 cu yard Open -top (Recycle), per pull $ 218.27 Front -Load container extra pick -up charges 2 cu yard $ 29.70 3 cu yard $ 37.12 4 cu yard $ 44.56 6 cu yard $ 51.98 8 cu yard $ 59.41 10 cu yard $ 66.82 OVER WEIGHT CHARGE $ 29.79 To address non standard requests, the solid waste contractor can negotiate a fee with the customer requesting the service. The City will collect 15% of the negotiated fee per the franchise agreement. 37 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees (Business Office 2018 -19� Water Deposit In City $ 125.00 Out of City $ 150.00 Commercial $ 100.00 or 2.5 times estimated monthly billing 2.5x Disconnect Fee $ 20.00 Extension Fee $ 5.00 2 free extensions Transfer Fee $ 10.00 Garbage Deposit Residential $ 25.00 Commercial $ 100.00 or 2 1/2 times estimated monthly billing 2.5x Meter Flow Test After Hours Disconnect /Reconnect $ 50.00 City Field Test $ 10.00 City Meter Bench Flow Test $ 25.00 Schertz Seguin Water Customers $ 4.00 Non - Schertz Seguin Customer $ 15.00 Extended Absence Charge $ 10.00 Re- Installation Fee, per hour $ 50.00 Fire Hydrant Fee Deposit $ 200.00 Service Fee $ 50.00 38 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works 2018 -19 Permit Fees - If tie into manhole or $ 25.00 street cut Fire Line Type Nos. 1 and 2 - (non- metered), in City 4 -inch service line connection or smaller $ 175.00 6 inch $ 235.00 8 inch $ 290.00 10 inch $ 340.00 12 inch $ 405.00 Fire Line - Outside City 4 -inch service line connection or smaller $ 225.00 6 inch $ 305.00 8 inch $ 375.00 10 inch $ 440.00 12 inch $ 525.00 Meter Installation Fees - Inside the City Meter Size 5/8" X 3/4" $ 330.00 3/4" X 3/4" $ 345.00 1" X 1" $ 450.00 1.5" X 1/5" $ 880.00 2" X 2" $ 1,940.00 *2" turbine Cost + Labor *3" Comp Cost + Labor *3" turbine Cost + Labor *4" Comp Cost + Labor *4" turbine Cost + Labor 39 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works 1 2018 -19 Meter Installation Fees - Outside the City Meter Size 5/8" X 3/4" $ 340.00 3/4" X 3/4" $ 355.00 1" X 1" $ 460.00 1.5" X 1/5" $ 890.00 2" X 2" $ 1,950.00 *2" turbine Cost + Labor *3" Comp Cost + Labor *3" turbine Cost + Labor *4" Comp Cost + Labor *4" turbine Cost + Labor Fire Hydrant Meter for Construction Deposit (refundable) $ 200.00 Service Charge $ 50.00 Wholesale Water Distribution Rate Base Rate, per month 3 Inch Compound Meter $ 315.28 3 Inch Turbine Meter $ 472.92 4 Inch Compound Meter $ 492.63 4 Inch Turbine Meter $ 827.62 6 Inch Compound Meter $ 985.26 6 Inch Turbine Meter $ 1,812.88 8 Inch Compound Meter $ 1,576.80 8 Inch Turbine Meter $ 3,153.60 10 Inch Compound Meter $ 2,266.65 10 Inch Turbine Meter $ 4,927.50 12 Inch Turbine Meter $ 6,504.30 Available by agreement to distributors with a self- maintained water distribution service, Military Bases, and for temporary use until reuse water is made available in a particular area. Network Nodes Application $ 500.00 Additional for each node over 5 on the application (up to 30) $ 250.00 Annual Public Right of Way $ 250.00 Node Support Pole Application Fee $ 1,000.00 Collaction Fee for Network Nodes on City Service Poles, per pole $20.00 per month Transport Facilities Application $ 500.00 Additional for each node over 5 on the application (up to 30) $ 250.00 Rental Fee for Transport Facilities, per device per month $ 28.00 Annual Public Right of Way Fee $ 250.00 Permit Fees will be due at the time of the permit submission. Permit will not be accepted if the permit fee is not attached. Other fees will be assessed at the time of permit approval 40 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees $ 0.53 $ 0.55 Sewer Rates 12016-1712017-181 2018 -19 Residential Rates (Single Family) 3.35 $ 3.58 $ Base Rate -per month $11.16 $11.72 $ 12.54 Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ City line Maintenance fee plus Franchise fee $ 0.44 $ 0.46 $ 0.49 User Charge based on 100% of avg consumption mo. $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 User avg. based on Nov, Dec, and Jan, min. 500 gals. Base Rate per month $ 3.35 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.79 $ 4.04 $ 4.32 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.34 $ 8.76 $ 9137 Business and Multi - familv Dwellina Units: Base Rate per month $14.03 $14.73 $ 15.77 The base rate shall be assessed in terms of connection equivalents which shall be as follows: the customer's previous 12 month water consumption as determined at the annual re- rating in February divided by 365, with the results of such division then divided by 245 gallons. The figure arrived at by the second division shall be the customer's "connection equivalent ". Each business shall be assessed a base rate. Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month Line Maintenance - Commercial /Industrial users plus Franchise fee $ 0.53 $ 0.55 $ 0.59 User Charge -based on 100% of water consumed $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.88 $ 4.14 $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.42 $ 8.84 $ 9.46 Public Schools Base Rate per month $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 Base Rate -each public school shall be assessed a $14.03 $14.73 $ 15.77 base rate per connection equivalent determined as in Business and Multi- family dwelling units above. (per month) Per 1,000 gal Charge, Per Month Line Maintenance - Commercial /Industrial users $ 0.53 $ 0.55 $ 0.59 User Charge -based on 100% of all water consumed $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3!.83 Per 1,000 gal charge Total- 12,000 gallons or less $ 3.88 $ 4.14 $ 4.42 greater than 12,000 gallons $ 8.42 $ 8.84 $ 9.46 For Information Purposes Only: Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA), Per 1,000 gallons $ 3.35 $ 3.58 $ 3.83 includes 5% franchise fee 41 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Capital Recovery Impact Fees 1 2015 -16 2016 -17 2018 -19 LUEs Meter Size Meter Type Water 5/8" SIMPLE 1.0 $ 2,934 $ 2,934 $ 2,934 3/4" SIMPLE 1.5 $ 4,401 $ 4,401 $ 4,401 1" SIMPLE 2.5 $ 7,335 $ 7,335 $ 7,335 1.5" SIMPLE 5.0 $ 14,670 $ 14,670 $ 14,670 2" SIMPLE 8.0 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 2" COMPOUND 8.0 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 $ 23,472 2" TURBINE 10.0 $ 29,340 $ 29,340 $ 29,340 3" COMPOUND 16.0 $ 46,944 $ 46,944 $ 46,944 3" TURBINE 24.0 $ 70,416 $ 70,416 $ 70,416 4" COMPOUND 25.0 $ 73,350 $ 73,350 $ 73,350 4" TURBINE 42.0 $ 123,228 $ 123,228 $ 123,228 6" COMPOUND 50.0 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 $ 146,700 6" TURBINE 92.0 $ 269,928 $ 269,928 $ 269,928 8" COMPOUND 80.0 $ 234,720 $ 234,720 $ 234,720 9" TURBINE 160.0 $ 469,440 $ 469,440 $ 469,440 10" COMPOUND 115.0 $ 337,410 $ 337,410 $ 337,410 10" TURBINE 250.0 $ 733,500 $ 733,500 $ 733,500 12" TURBINE 330.0 $ 968,220 $ 968,220 $ 968,220 SEWER COLLECTION IMPACT FEE *Collection Impact Fee Per Living Unit Equivalent (LUE) *Sewer based on LUE: LUE = 245 gallons per day These are only City of Schertz impact fees. Other Utility Impact Fees *Treatment Impact Fee Per LUE: Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Example by meter size: 5/8" Simple ROADWAY IMAPACT FEE Residential Home Nonresidential, per service unit* *The number of service units are based on the use of the property. A fee calculator is available on the City Website under the Engineering page $ 1,668 $ 1,668 $ 1,668 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $1,306.00 $1,306.00 $ 1,607.24 N/A $2,022.00 $ 2,022.00 N/A $ 100.00 $ 100.00 42 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 5/8 IN 0 $ 23.89 $ 24.61 $ 2.95 $ 3.04 ? $ 28.09 $ 28.94 ! $ 5.73 $ 5.90 CODE 1 6,000 $ 41.59 ! $ 42.85 ` $ 3.00 $ 3.09 ? $ 62.47 $ 64.37 $ 5.80 $ 5.97 9,000 $ 50.59 $ 52.12 ` $ 3.24 $ 3.34 $ 79.87 $ 82.29 ` $ 6.32 $ 6.49 12,000 $ 60.31 $ 62.14 $ 3.50 $ 3.61 < $ 98.83 $ 101.77 $ 6.80 $ 6.97 15,000 $ 70.81 $ 72.97 $ 3.71 $ 3.82 $ 119.23 $ 122.70 $ 7.20 $ 7.37 18,000 $ 81.94 ! $ 84.43 $ 4.67 $ 4.81 $ 140.83 $ 144.82 - $ 9.06 $ '; 9.23 30,000 $ 137.98 $ 142.15 $ 5.30 $ 5.46 ` $ 249.55 $ 255.64 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.48 45,000 $ 217.48 $ 224.05 $ 5.64 $ 5.81 $ 404.20 $ 412.91 $ 10.97 $ 11.14 60,000 $ 302.08 $ 311.20 $ 5.85 $ 6.03 $ 568.75 $4 580.09 $ 11.35 $ 11.52 75,000+ $ 389.83 $ 401.65 > $ 5.97 $ 6.15 $ 739.00 $ { 752.96 ` $ 11.60 $ 1117 3/4 IN 0 $ 35.82 $ 35.82 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 42.12 $ =' 46.76 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 2 6,000 $ 53.52 $ 53.52 < $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 76.50 $ 82.22 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 9,000 $ 62.52 $ 62.52 ' $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 93.90 $ 100.16 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 12,000 $ 72.24 $ 72.24 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 112.86 $ 119.66 > $ 6.80 $ ` 6.98 15,000 $ 82.74 $ 82.74 ` $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 133.26 $ 140.60 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 18,000 $ 93.87 $ 9187 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 154.86 $ 162.74 ' $ 9.06 $ 9.24 30,000 $ 149.91 $ 149.91 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 263.58 $ 273.63 $ 10.31 $ ! 10.49 45,000 $ 229.41 $ 229.41 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 418.23 $; 430.98 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 60,000 $ 314.01 $ 314.01 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 582.78 $ 598.24 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 75,000+ $ 401.76 $ 401.76 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 753.03 $ 771.19 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 1.0 IN 0 $ 59.70 $ 59.70 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 70.21 $ 77.93 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 3 6,000 $ 77.40 $ 77.40 '' $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 104.59 $ 113.39 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 9,000 $ 86.40 $ 86.40 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 121.99 $' 131.33 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 12,000 $ 96.12 $ 96.12 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 140.95 $ 150.83 ! $ 6.80 $ ! 6,98 15,000 $ 106.62 $ 106.62 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 161.35 $; 171.78 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 18,000 $ 117.75 $ 117.75 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 182.95 $? 193.92 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 30,000 $ 173.79 $ 173.79 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 291.67 $`, 304.80 $ 10.31 $ 10.49' 45,000 $ 253.29 $ 25129 ` $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 446.32 $ 462.15 < $ 10.97 $ 11.15 60,000 $ 337.89 $ 337.89 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 610.87 $ 629.41 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 75,000+ $ 425.64 $ 425.64 - $ 5.97 $ 5:97 $ 781.12 $ 802.36 ` $ 11.60 $ 11.78 43 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 1 1/2 IN 0 $ 142.84 $ 158.55 $ 2.95 $ 2`.95 $ 140.40 $ 155.85 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 CODE 4 15,000 $ 187.09 $ 202.80 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 22635 $ 244.50 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 30,000 $ 232.09 $ 247.80 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 313.35 $ 334.21 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 45,000 $ 280.69 $ 296.40 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 408.15 $ 431.71 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 60,000 $ 333.19 $ 348.90 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 510.15 $ 536.42 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 75,000 $ 388.84 $ 404.55 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 618.15 $ 647.12 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 100,000 $ 505.59 $ 52130 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 844.65 $ 878.13 ` $ 10.31 $ 10.49 125,000 $ 638.09 $ 653.80 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 1,102.40 $ 1,140.39 ? $ 10.97 $ 11.15 150,000 $ 779.09 $ 794.80 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 1,376.65 $ s 1,419.15 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 175,000+ $ 925.34 $ ;941.05 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 1,660.40 $'; 1,707.40 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 2 IN 0 $ 228.53 ! $ 253.67 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 224.65 $ 249.36 < $ 5.73 $ 5.91 SIMPLE 24,000 $ 299.33 $ 324.47 < $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 362.17 $t 391.21 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 COMPOUND 48,000 $ 371.33 $ 396.47 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 501.37 $' 534.74 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 CODE5 72,000 $ 449.09 $ 474.23 $ 3.50 $ 3.50' $ 653.05 $! 690.75 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 96,000 $ 533.09 $ 558.23 < $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 816.25 $ 858.27 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 120,000 $ 622.13 $ 647.27 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 989.05 $ 1,035.40 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 160000 $ 808.93 $ 834.07 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 1,351.45 $ 1,405.02 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 200,000 $ 1,020.93 $ 1;046.07 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 1,763.85 $ 1,824.63 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 240,000 $ 1,246.53 $ 1,271.67 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 2,202.65 $s 2,270.64 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53' 280,000+ $ 1,480.53 $ 1;505.67 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 2,656.65 $ 2,731.85 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 2IN 0 $ 285.66 $ 317.08 ` $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 280.82 $ 311.71 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 30,000 $ 374.16 $ 405.58 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 452.72 $ 489.02 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 6 60,000 $ 464.16 $ 495.58 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 626.72 $ s 668.43 ` $ 6.32 $ 6.50 90,000 $ 561.36 $ 592.78 ! $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 81632 $ 863.44 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 120,000 $ 666.36 $ 697.78 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 1,020.32 $i 1,072.85 $ 7.20 $ 7.38' 150,000 $ 777.66 $ 809.08 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 1,236.32 $' 1,294.26 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 200,000 $ 1,011.16 $ 1,042.58 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 1,689.32 $ 1,756.27 ` $ 10.31 $ 10.49 250,000 $ 1,276.16 $ 1,307.58 - $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 2,204.82 $ 2,280.79 < $ 10.97 $ 11.15 300,000 $ 1,558.16 $ 1,589.58 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 2,753.32 $' 2,838.30 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 350,000+ $ 1,850.66 $ 1,882.08 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 3,320.82 $ 3,414.82' $ 11.60 $ 11.78 44 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 3 IN 0 $ 457.06 $ 507.34 $ 2.95 $ 2`.95 $ 44931 $ 498.73 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 48,000 $ 598.66 $ 64 &94 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 724.35 $< 782.42 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 7 96,000 $ 742.66 $ 792.94 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,002.75 $' 1,069.48 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 144,000 $ 898.18 $ 948.46 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 1,306.11 $ 1,381.49 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 192,000 $ 1,066.18 $ 1,116.46 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 1,632.51 $' 1,716.55' $ 7.20 $ 7.38' 240,000 $ 1,244.26 $ 1,294.54 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 1,978.11 $; 2,070.80 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 320,000 $ 1,617.86 $ 1,668.14 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 2,702.91 $? 2,810.03 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 400,000 $ 2,041.86 $ 2;09214 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 3,527.71 $ 3,649.26 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 480,000 $ 2,493.06 $ 2,543.34 ; $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 4,405.31 $ 4,541.28 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 560,000+ $ 2,961.06 $ 3,011.34 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 5,313.31 $! 5,463.71 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 3 I 0 $ 685.59 $ 761.01 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 673.96 $ 748.09 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 72,000 $ 897.99 $ 97141 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,086.52 $! 1,173.64 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE8 144,000 $ 1,113.99 $ 1,189.41 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,504.12 $ 1,604.22' $ 6.32 $ 6.50 216,000 $ 1,347.27 $ 1 ,422.69 $ 3.50 $ 3.50' $ 1,959.16 $' 2,072.24 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 288,000 $ 1,599.27 $ 1,674.69 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 2,448.76 $ 2,574.82 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 408,000 $ 2,044.47 $ 2;119.89 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 3,312.76 $ 3,460.46 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 528,000 $ 2,604.87 $ 2,680.29 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 4,399.96 $ 4,569.30 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 648,000 $ 3,240.87 $ 3,316.29 $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 5,637.16 $' 5,828.14 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 768,000 $ 3,917.67 $ 3,993.09 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 6,953.56 $; 7,166.18 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53 888,000+ $ 4,619.67 $ 4,695.09 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 8,315.56 $' 8,549.81 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 4 I 0 $ 714.16 $ 792.72 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 702.04 $r 779.27 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 75,000 $ 935.41 $ 1;01197 + $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,131.79 $ 1,222.54 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 9 150,000 $ 1,160.41 $ 1;238.97 ? $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 1,566.79 $ 1,671.06 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 225,000 $ 1,403.41 $ 1,481.97 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 2,040.79 $ 2,158.59 > $ 6.80 $ 6.98 300,000 $ 1,665.91 $ 1,744.47: $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 2,550.79 $ 2,682.11 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 425,000 $ 2,129.66 $ 2,208.22 ` $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 3,450.79 $ 3,604.65 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 550,000 $ 2,713.41 $ 2,791.97 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 4,583.29 $'; 4,759.69 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 675,000 $ 3,375.91 $ 3,454.47 $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 5,872.04 $ 6,070.98 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 800,000 $ 4,080.91 $ 4,159.47 ` $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 7,243.29 $` 7,464.77 - $ 11.35 $ 11.53 925,000+ $ 4,812.16 $ 4,890.72 ` $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 8,662.04 $ 8,906.06 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 45 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 4 IN 0 $ 1,199.80 $ 1;331.77 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 1,179.42 $ 1,309.16 s $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 126,000 $ 1,571.50 $ 1,703.47 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,901.40 $ 2,053.86 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 10 252,000 $ 1,949.50 $ 2,081.47 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 2,632.20 $ i 2,807.37 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 378,000 $ 2,357.74 $ 2;48911 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 3,428.52 $ 3,626.41 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 504,000 $ 2,798.74 $ 2;930.71 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 4,285.32 $ 4,505.93 s $ 7.20 $ 7.38 630,000 $ 3,266.20 $ 3;398.17 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 5,192.52 $ 5,435.85 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 840,000 $ 4,246.90 $ 4;378.87 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 7,095.12 $ 7,376.32 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 1,050,000 $ 5,359.90 $ 5;491.87 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 9,260.22 $I' 9,579.29 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 1,260,000 $ 6,544.30 $ 6,676.27 >; $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 11,563.92 $ 11,920.85 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 1,470,000+ $ 7,772.80 $ 7,904.77 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 13,947.42 $ 14,342.22 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 6 IN 0 $ 1,428.33 $ 1,585.44 < $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 1,404.08 $ 1,558.53 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 150,000 $ 1,870.83 $ 2,027.94 ` $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 2,263.58 $i 2,445.08 ? $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 11 300,000 $ 2,320.83 $ 2,477.94 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 3,133.58 $' 3,342.13 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 450,000 $ 2,806.83 $ 2,963.94 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 4,081.58 $ 4,317.17 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 600,000 $ 3,331.83 $ 3,488.94 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 5,101.58 $ 5,364.22 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 750,000 $ 3,888.33 $ 4;045.44 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 6,181.58 $ 6,471.27 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,000,000 $ 5,055.83 $ 5,212.94 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 8,446.58 $' 8,781.35 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.49 1,250,000 $ 6,380.83 $ 6;53294 - $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 11,024.08 $ 11,403.93 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 1,500,000 $ 7,790.83 $ 7,947.94 ` $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 13,766.58 $ 14,191.50 $ 11.35 $ ? 11.53' 1,750,000+ $ 9,253.33 $ 9,410.44 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 16,604.08 $l 17,074.08 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 6 IN 0 $ 2,628.11 $ 2;917.20 ; $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 2,583.51 $` 2,583.51 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 276,000 $ 3,442.31 $ 3;731.40 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 4,164.99 $? 4,214.76 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 12 552,000 $ 4,270.31 ! $ 4,559.40 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 5,765.79 $`- 5,865.32 $ 6.32 $ 6.50' 828,000 $ 5,164.55 $ 5,453.64 $ 3.50 '$ 3.50 ' $ 7,510.11 $; 7,659.41 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,104,000 $ 6,130.55 $ 6;419.64 '; $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 9,386.91 $ 9,585.98 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,380,000 $ 7,154.51 $ 7,443.60' $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 11,374.11 $ 11,62294 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,840,000 $ 9,302.71 $ 9,591.80 ! $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 15,541.71 $ 15,873.49 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,300,000 $ 11,740.71 $ 12,029.80 $ 5.64 '$ 5.64 $ 20,284.31 $; 20,699.03 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 2,760,000 $ 14,335.11 ! $ 14;62420 ' $ 5.85 $ 5.85 ? $ 25,330.51 $' 25,828.18 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 3,220,000+ $ 17,026.11 $ 17;315.20 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 30,551.51 $ 31,132.12 < $ 11.60 $ 11.78 46 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 8 IN 0 $ 2,308.51 $ 2;562.44 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 2,269.09 $ 2,269.09 s $ 5.73 $ 5.91 COMPOUND 240,000 $ 3,016.51 $ 3;270.44 - $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 3,644.29 $ 3,687.57 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 13 480,000 $ 3,736.51 $ 3,990.44 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 5,036.29 $ 5,122.84 $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 720,000 $ 4,514.11 $ 4,768.04 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 6,553.09 $? 6,682.92 ' $ 6.80 $ 6.98 960,000 $ 5,354.11 $ 5,608.04 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 8,185.09 $ 8,358.19 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,200,000 $ 6,244.51 $ 6;498.44 ! $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 9,913.09 $ 10,129.47 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 1,600,000 $ 8,112.51 $ 8;366.44 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 13,537.09 $' 13,825.59 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,000,000 $ 10,232.51 $ 10,486.44 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 17,661.09 $ 18,021.72 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 2,400,000 $ 12,488.51 $ 12;742.44: $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 22,049.09 $- 22,481.85 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 2,800,000+ $ 14,828.51 $ 15;082.44 ' $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 26,589.09 $' 27,093.97 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 8 IN 0 $ 4,617.01 $ 5,124.88 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 4,538.17 $ 5,037.37 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 480,000 $ 6,033.01 $ 6,540.88 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 7,288.57 $ 7,874.32 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 14 960,000 $ 7,473.01 $ 7,980.88 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 10,072.57 $ 10,744.87 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 1,440,000 $ 9,028.21 $ 9;536.08 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 13,106.17 $ 13,865.02 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,920,000 $ 10,708.21 $ 11;216.08 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 16,370.17 $' 17,215.57 < $ 7.20 $ 7.38 2,400,000 $ 12,489.01 $ 12;996.88 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 19,826.17 $ 20,758.12 ' $ 9.06 $ 9.24 3,200,000 $ 16,225.01 $ 16,732.88 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 27,074.17 $ 28,150.37 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 4,000,000 $ 20,465.01 $ 20;972.88 ' $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 35,322.17 $'; 36,542.63 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 4,800,000 $ 24,977.01 $ 25,484.88 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 44,098.17 $ 45,462.88 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 5,600,000+ $ 31,997.01 $ 32;504.88 $ 5.97 !$ 5.97 $ 57,718.17 $ 59,299.26 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 10 IN 0 $ 3,318.47 $ 3,683.51 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 ` $ 3,261.81 $ 3,620.61 $ 5.73 $ ? 5.91 COMPOUND 345,000 $ 4,336.22 $ 4,701.26 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 'i $ 5,238.66 $ 5,659.67 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 15 690,000 $ 5,371.22 $ 5,736.26 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 7,239.66 $ 7,722.88 $ 6.32 $ 6.50 1,035,000 $ 6,489.02 $ 6,854.06 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 9,420.06 $ 9,965.49 < $ 6.80 $ 6.98 1,380,000 $ 7,696.52 $ 8;061.56 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 ? $ 11,766.06 $ 12,373.70 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 1,725,000 $ 8,976.47 $ 9,341.51 ' $ 4.67 i$ 4.67 ! $ 14,250.06 $ 14,919.90 ? $ 9.06 $ 9.24 2,300,000 $ 11,661.72 $ 12,026.76 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 ' $ 19,459.56 $' 20,23109 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 2,875,000 $ 14,709.22 $ 15,074.26 s $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 25,387.81 $ 26,265.02 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 3,450,000 $ 17,952.22 $ 18,317.26 $ 5.85 $ 5.85' $ 31,695.56 $ 32,676.45 > $ 11.35 $ ' 11.53 4,025,000+ $ 21,315.97 $ 21,681.01 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 38,221.81 $ 39,306.38 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 47 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Public Works - Water Rates 1 2018 -19 GALLONS SOLD BY METER SIZE (RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL) INSIDE CITY I I OUTSIDE CITY METER BLOCK CURRENT GALLONS BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 BLOCK RATE BLOCK RATE RATE 1000 RATE 1000 10 IN 0 $ 6,499.16 $ 6,499.16 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 6,770.05 $ 6,770.05 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 750,000 $ 8,711.66 $ 8,711.66 $ 3.00 $ 3.00 $ 11,067.55 $ 11,202.79 $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 16 1,500,000 $ 10,961.66 $ 10,961.66 $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 15,417.55 $ 15,688.02' $ 6.32 $ ? 6.50 2,250,000 $ 13,391.66 $ 13,391.66 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 $ 20,157.55 $ 20,563.26 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 3,000,000 $ 16,016.66 $ 16,016.66 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 $ 25,257.55 $ 25,798.49 ? $ 7.20 $ 7.38 3,750,000 $ 18,799.16 $ 18,799.16 $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 30,657.55 $i 31,333.73 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 5,000,000 $ 24,636.66 ! $ 24,636.66 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 41,982.55 $` 42,884.12 $ 10.31 $ 10.49 6,250,000 $ 31,261.66 $ 31,261.66 $ 5.64 i$ 5.64 $ 54,870.05 $ 55,997.02 $ 10.97 $ 11.15 7,500,000 $ 38,311.66 $ 38 311.66 $ 5.85 $ 5.85 $ 68,582.55 $; 69,934.91 $ 11.35 $ 11.53 8,750,000+ $ 45,624.16 ! $ 45,624.16 $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 82,770.05 $ 84,347.80 $ 11.60 $ 11.78 12 IN 0 $ 9,522.58 $ 10,570.07 $ 2.95 $ 2.95 $ 9,359.97 $ 9,359.97 $ 5.73 $ 5.91 TURBINE 990,000 $ 12,443.08 $ 13,490.57 $ 3.00 '$ 3.00 $ 15,032.67 $' 15,211.18 ' $ 5.80 $ 5.98 CODE 17 1,980,000 $ 15,413.08 $ 16;460.57 < $ 3.24 $ 3.24 $ 20,774.67 $' 21,131.69 +? $ 6.32 $ 6.50 2,970,000 $ 18,620.68 $ 19,668.17 $ 3.50 $ 3.50 ' $ 27,031.47 $ 27,567.00 $ 6.80 $ 6.98 3,960,000 $ 22,085.68 ! $ 23,133.17 $ 3.71 $ 3.71 ' $ 33,76147 $' 34,477.52 $ 7.20 $ 7.38 4,950,000 $ 25,758.58 $ 26,806.07 < $ 4.67 $ 4.67 $ 40,891.47 $' 41,784.03 $ 9.06 $ 9.24 6,600,000 $ 33,464.08 $ 34,511.57 $ 5.30 $ 5.30 $ 55,840.47 $ 57,030.55 ! $ 10.31 $ 10.49 8,250,000 $ 42,209.08 $ 43,256.57 ? $ 5.64 $ 5.64 $ 72,851.97 $' 74,339.57 ' $ 10.97 $ 11.15 9,900,000 $ 51,515.08 $ 52,562.57' $ 5.85 $ 5.85 - $ 90,952.47 $s 92,737.59 > $ 11.35 $ 11.53 11,550,000+ $ 61,167.58 $ 62,215.07 < $ 5.97 $ 5.97 $ 109,679.97 $'- 111,762.60 ` $ 11.60 $ 11.78 CURRENT RATE 1000 RATE 1000 FH METER 122.30 135.75 8.47 9..40 Cibolo Wholesale Water Rate 3.27 3.27 48 City of Schertz Schedule of Fees Drought Contingency Surcharges 1 2018 -191 For the first 1,000 gallons over allocation* $ 2.00 For the second 1,000 gallons over allocation* $ 3.00 For the third 1,000 gallons over allocation* $ 4.00 For each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation* $ 5.00 Drought Contingency Violation Fines, up to $ 200.00 *Refer to the Conservation Ordinance for all allocations 49 Agenda No. 6 0111 &WOL11"LlusIaU 1 DIU [o7 710 Rod 1 City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Subject: BACKGROUND Finance Ordinance No. 18 -T -32 — Consideration and /or action approving an ordinance adopting a budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 and ending September 30, 2019. . Final Reading (B. James /J. Walters) In accordance with applicable statutes and the City Charter, the City Manager submitted a budget proposal to the City Council for consideration on August 1.0, 2018. . The City Council held public hearings for the Proposed Budget on August 28, 2018 and September 4, 2018. In the General Fund, Staff has proposed increasing the amount of funds allocated toward maintenance of parks, streets, and facilities by $235,000 each. The Water & Sewer Fund has an increase of $800,000 in the contribution to Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation in preparation of the new pipeline and water supply development, an increase of $400,000 in sewer treatment costs and for new population, and an increase in debt payments of $275,000. A copy of the proposed budget is available for view on the City's webpage www,schertz.com. Also included on the same page of the website are copies of the PowerPoint presentation to City Council, the copy of the PowerPoint presentation and video recording for the Community Budget Meetings, a list of all requested expanded programs, and the property tax notice required by the state statutes. FISCAL IMPACT General Fund $33,489,265 Special Events Fund* 156,510 Tax I &S Fund 6,653,723 Water & Sewer Fund 24,435,188 Capital. Recovery -Water 256,000 Capital Recovery -Sewer 260,500 Drainage Fund 1,162,559 EMS Fund 9,235,636 SEDC 5,749,744 PEG Fund 195,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund 256,732 City Council Memorandum Page 2 Park Fund Tree Mitigation Library Fund Historical Committee Total 100,000 75,000 32,400 11,750 $82,070,007 *in the previous CCM from September 4, 2018, the Special Events Fund incorrectly listed the total budget expenditures and has been corrected $190 lower Replacement Pages: • Replacing General Fund Revenue & Expense Summary, General Fund Revenue, and the Executive Summary to reflect a transfer from reserves of $1,609,075 • Replace Finance Narrative page to update department description RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve final reading of Ordinance No. 18 -T -32, adopting the budget for the fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018 . and ending September 30, 2019 and approves a transfer from General Fund Reserves of $1,609,075 for operations. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 18 -T -32 Replacement Pages ORDINANCE NO. 18 -T -32 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2018, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF THE BUDGET; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Schertz is a home rule city acting under its charter adopted by the electorate pursuant to Article X1, Section 5 of the Texas Constitution and Chapter 9 of the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the Acting City Manager of the City of Schertz submitted a budget proposal to the City Council prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, and in said budget proposal set forth the estimated revenues and expenditures and made the detailed classification as required by the City Charter of the City of Schertz, Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all provisions pertaining to the adoption of a budget contained in the City Charter have been in all things complied with; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas on the 28th day of August 2018, and the 4th day of September 2018; and WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration, the City Council is of the opinion the budget should be approved and adopted; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The budget of the expenditures of the City of Schertz for the ensuing fiscal year beginning October 1, 2018, and ending September 30, 2019, as modified by the City Council, be, and the same is, in all things, adopted and approved as the said City of Schertz budget for the Fiscal Year beginning the first day of October 2018, and ending the thirtieth day of September 2019. SECTION 2. The sums below are hereby appropriated from the respective funds for the payment of expenditures on behalf of the City government as established in the approved budget document: 2018 -2019 Budget General Fund $33,489,265 Special Events Fund 156,510 Tax I &S Fund 6,653,723 Water & Sewer Fund 24,435,188 Capital Recovery -Water 256,000 Capital Recovery -Sewer 260,500 Drainage Fund 1,162,559 EMS Fund 9,235,636 SEDC 5,749,744 PEG Fund 195,000 Hotel Occupancy Tax Fund 256,732 Park Fund 100,000 Tree Mitigation 75,000 Library Fund 32,400 Historical Committee 11,750 Total $82,070,007 SECTION 3. A true and correct copy of this ordinance along with the approved budget attached hereto, and any amendments thereto, shall be filed with the City Secretary. In addition, the City Manager is hereby directed to file or cause to be filed a true and correct copy of this ordinance along with the approved budget attached hereto, and any amendments thereto, in the office of the County Clerk of Guadalupe, Comal, and Bexar Counties, Texas, as required by law. SECTION 4. This ordinance shall be cumulative of all provisions of ordinances and of the Code of Ordinances of the City of Schertz, Texas (2006), as amended, except where the provisions of this ordinance are in direct conflict with the provisions of such ordinances and such Code, in which event the conflicting provisions of such ordinances and such Code are hereby repealed. a pro 1 [1101 It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of this ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. SECTION 6. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so ordained. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018 PASSED AND APPROVED ON FINAL READING THIS l I th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018. Michael. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary Executive Summary General Fund Revenue: General Fund revenue will increase 1.2% over FY 2017 -18 year end estimates and the largest contributor to this increase will be from property taxes. The property taxes for FY 2018 -19 are estimated to increase 11.2% from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates with the increase in the Maintenance and Operations (M &O) rate to $0.3497. The revenue generated by this rate increase will go to fund additional streets, parks, and facility maintenance. Sales Taxes are expected to increase 5.8% from year end estimates. This trend follows the area population growth and the potential for new businesses yet is conservative when looking at the average 5 -year growth. Permits, Fees, Fines, and Other Tax are expected to decrease 25.2% from year end estimates due to an irregular volume of permits in FY 2017 -18 which marked the second highest intake of permit revenue received by the City in a single year. Permit revenue is expected to return to regular historic levels for FY 2018 -19. Miscellaneous Income will also decrease 25.6% due to an influx in public safety deployment reimbursements in FY 2017 -18. Throughout the end of FY2016 -17 and all of FY 2017 -18, City of Schertz Firefighters were deployed to disasters statewide ranging from Hurricane Harvey aftermath to wildfires to render aid. These deployments are fully reimbursed by Federal and State programs. FY 2017 -18 is a high year for deployment request reimbursements which is not expected to continue in FY 2018 -19. To balance the budget, a transfer of $1,609,075 from reserves is planned to cover General Fund expenditures. Expenses: The overall FY 2018 -19 General Fund Budget increased 9.2% from FY 2017- 18 year end estimates. This increase includes $735,000, or a 2.4% increase, for streets, parks, and facility maintenance programs. The City's parks and streets were identified in the Citizen Satisfaction Survey of 2016 as areas for the City to improve upon. The tax rate increase was proposed to raise the funds start addressing concerns about levels of service in these areas. Also new to the FY 2018 -19 Budget is the grand opening of Fire Station 3 which includes full year funding of operational costs and the final 3 personnel that were hired mid 2017- 18. Another notable item for the FY 2018 -19 Budget is the implementation of the Classification & Compensation Study's fourth and final year of the recommendation. 131 employees in 65 different positions throughout the General Fund and other Operating Funds will receive a pay change in accordance with the recommendation. These were positions identified in a survey conducted by a 3rd party that were below market averages 1 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY for pay in their field. The fiscal impact on the General Fund for the fourth year adjustment will be $265,000. In FY 2017 -18 a new permit software began the implementation process. The total project cost is estimated to be $375,000 and will improve the plan review and permit issuing process by making it streamlined for a faster and more convenient way for developers and residents to build in Schertz. The estimated remaining project cost that was not expensed in FY 2017 -18 of is included in the FY2018 -19 to complete the project. City Council The FY 2018 -19 Budget increase 16.4% from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates due to recording costs for Council on the Go meetings. City Manager The FY 2018 -19 Budget decrease 11.9% from the FY 2017 -18 year end projections due to decrease in personnel costs. Municipal Court The FY 2018 -19 Budget decrease 7.3% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections with the transfer of a Court Clerk position to a Floating Clerk position split between Inspections and Utility Billing. This transfer was due to increased workloads seen in Inspections and Utility Billing while less citations are being issued. 311 Customer Service The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 1.4% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections. There will be no change in operations. Planning & Zoning The FY 2018 -19 Budget increase 2.2% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections by increasing supplies and training. Legal Services The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 15.9% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections to $160,000 which is amount estimated to be enough to cover and changes in the most common legal matters including contract review. City Secretary The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 3.0% from FY 2017 -18 due to additional Unified Development Code amendments that will need to be recorded in the City's Code of Ordinances. Non - Departmental The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 18.3% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections by increasing City Support Services to set contingencies to the starting value of $300,000 and increasing the County Appraisal District costs due to a rising population. 2 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Public Affairs The Public Affairs Budget for FY 2018 -19 combined the previously separated Records Management, Schertz Magazine, and Public Affairs. The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 13.9% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates due to a transfer of the two Special Events personnel to the Parks Department. Offsetting part of the decreased from the transferred program, is the implementation of the second Citizen Satisfaction Survey to take place in FY 2018 -19. Records Management Beginning FY 2018 -19, this Budget will be combined with the Public Affairs Department. Schertz Magazine Beginning FY 2018 -19, this Budget will be combined with the Public Affairs Department. Engineering The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 8.8% from FY 2017 -18 year end projections by providing for additional plan review services and a replacement work truck. GIS The FY 2018 -19 Budget increases 0.1 % from the FY 2017 -18 year end projections with no change in operations. Police Beginning in FY 2018 -19, this Budget will be combined with the Marshal and Environmental Health Budgets. The FY 2018 -19 Budget increases 6.2% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates with the addition of 1 Student Resource Officer with a vehicle and equipment as well with lower turnover with the new cadet program. Fire Rescue The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 10.1 % from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. This increase is due to the additional operating costs associated with opening of Fire Station 3 including full year funding of all personnel assigned to Station 3 and associated overtime and the purchase of a replacement Brush Truck. Inspections The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 4.8% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. The addition of half of a Floating Clerk salary, split with Utility Billing, will be offset by lowering the third party inspection services contract use. FY 2017 -18 saw an increase use of this contract with the large number of permits that is not expected to continue into FY 2018 -19. Contract Services will further be decreased and will fully offset the hiring of 2 additional Building Inspector positions. Marshal Services Beginning FY 2018 -19, this Budget will be combined with the Police Department. 3 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Streets The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 7.3% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate with the addition of $235,000 for additional streets and sidewalk maintenance throughout the City. Parks The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 46.0% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate. This increase is from the addition of $235,000 for regular park maintenance through additional supplies and improvements. Also included in the Budget are improvements for the Senior Center Parking Lot of $50,000 and $165,500 for two replacement mowers, a replacement work truck, and a replacement bucket truck. Pools The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 6.2% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate. The annual contribution for the operations of the Aquatics Center can vary year by year based on fiscal performance of the YMCA. The proposed budget includes an average of the actual costs incurred since the Aquatics Center opened. Event Facilities The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase $281,373 from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to the dedicated support staff being transferred from Building Maintenance to this budget as well as the Civic Center Manager position from Public Affairs. Overall, this includes the transfer of 4 full time personnel and 1 part time and no new positions. This increase also includes $20,000 for a cleaning contract for the Civic Center to assist in keeping the facility clean and ready for customers' use. Library The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 1.2% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate with the one time funding of additional $20,000 of library materials. Animal Services The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 4.5% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates due to the decrease in capital expenditures. Capital expenditures do not occur every year and only when the vehicle or equipment needs to be replaced. Non - capital expenditures will increase 8.3% for estimating lower turnover in FY 2018 -19. Environmental Health Beginning FY 2018 -19, this Budget will be combined with the Police Department. Information Technology The Information Technology FY 2018 -19 Budget increased 15.5% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. Included in FY 2018 -19 is the remaining costs of setting up the new permit software of $233,137 plus additional $20,000 in tablets and peripherals for staff and board members to leverage the new software for operating efficiencies. Personnel Services increased with the transfer of the Public Safety Systems Technician from the 4 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Police Budget to Information Technology. New software and equipment also includes new Animal Shelter management software. Human Resources The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 19.3% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate for a formal employee compensation study conducted by a third party and transferring existing budget for Employee Appreciation Events from the Special Events Fund to Staff Support. Finance The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 9.6% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to a higher personnel estimates caused by lower expected turnover. Purchasing & Asset Management The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 5.8% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to lower capital expenditures. Capital expenditures include vehicles and equipment that are not expected to be replaced or purchased every year. Fleet Services The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 11.0% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to additional capital expenditures related to replacement of a tire balancing machine and vehicle and the purchase of a new hot water pressure washer and parts cleaning tank. Facility Services The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 7.5% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate. This increase added an additional $200,000 in supplies and improvements for additional maintenance of city facilities. Also included is a new HVAC Technician to perform regular maintenance on the City's air conditioning system which will extend its life and reduce future costs. This increase is offset by a transfer of personnel to Event Facilities, including 3 full time positions and a part time position to be dedicated to the civic and community centers. City Assistance The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 4.4% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to an increase in the transportation assistance program to match the growth in the number of transports. The fee did not increase in FY 2017 -18 from the year prior. Court Restricted Funds The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase $27,180 from the FY 2017 -18 to replace old ticket writers from the Court Technology Fund Balance. Special Events Fund Revenue: The revenue for FY 2018 -19 is expected to decrease 4.5% from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates for with the removal of transfers for employee appreciation events. 5 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Expenses: The Special Events Fund FY 2018 -19 Budget increased 6.5% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. This increase is for new events such as a Daddy Daughter Dance, a Kickball League, and a Dodgeball League which are offset by registration and ticket fees. Employee appreciation events will now be in Human Resources' budget. Interest & Sinking Fund Revenues: Revenues for FY 2018 -19 increase 5.9% from the FY 2017 -18 estimate with a $113,723 transferred from reserves for the year. This withdraw is a planned transfer of excess reserves to reduce the tax rate. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget will decrease 2.4% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate with the completion of the 2013 Tax Notes. Water & Sewer Fund Revenue: Revenues for FY 2018 -19 are expected to increase 6.2% from the FY 2017- 18 year end estimate. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget increases 7.0% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates to include additional bond payments for infrastructure improvements, a higher contribution to SSLGC for the new water line construction, and higher sewer treatment costs. Utility Billing The FY 2018 -19 Budget increases 15.2% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate with the addition of a Floating Clerk, split with Inspections, and higher expected credit card fees. Administration The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 11.1 % from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate. Maintenance Services are expected to increase $600,000 due to higher sewer treatment costs. The new 2018 bond issuance will fund the replacement and installation of a new water meter system, loop lines for continuous service, and the relocation of utilities on FM 1103 to make room for the road expansion which results in higher debt payments. Expected contributions to Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation will increase to begin construction on a new water supply line into Schertz and ensure the water supply for the City. Capital Recovery Fund - Water Projects for FY 2018 -19 include conducting the Water/Wastewater Capital Recovery Study to identify future capital needs. Ongoing projects include the 1 million gallon elevated tank at Corbett. Capital Recovery Fund - Sewer Projects for FY 2018 -19 include conducting the Water/Wastewater Capital Recovery Study to identify future capital needs. Ongoing projects include the construction of the 6 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY main trunk line in southern Schertz that will connect to the new sewer treatment facility being added to the area. Drainage Fund Revenue: The FY 2018 -19 revenue from drainage fees is expected to increase 6.8% with new commercial and residential development occurring in the City. Overall revenue will decrease 6.8% from the prior year which saw a one time contribution from Cibolo for the bridge reconstruction. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 15.3% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate due to an expected reduction in turnover and additional administrative costs supporting the Engineering Department through the Interfund Charge. Overall expenditures will decrease by $1.6 million since FY 2017 -18 saw a many drainage improvement projects funded during that year, using up all available construction funds. EMS Fund Revenue: Revenues for FY 2018 -19 are expected to increase 4.0% from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. In addition to additional transports increasing revenue, the Inter - Jurisdictional revenues will increase with a 3% rate increase to provide coverage for each community serviced by the City's EMS. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget will increase 4.5% from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate with additional personnel and supply costs. Schertz Economic Development Corporation (SEDC) Revenues: The revenue for FY 2018 -19 is projected to increase by 35.9% from the FY 2017 -18 year -end estimate. The increase reflects a 5.8% increase in sales tax from general increases in the economy and a planned transfer from reserves of $1,249,164 for Performance Agreements. Expenses: The expenses for FY 2018 -19 are projected to increase by 145.1 %, or $3,403,570, from the FY 2017 -18 year -end estimate to include $4,800,000 in Annual Infrastructure Grants associated with four SEDC Performance Agreements. This increase is partially offset with the removal in debt contributions since the corporation paid off all outstanding debt and the removal of General Fund contributions for permitting software that was made in FY 2017 -18. Public, Educational, and Governmental Access (PEG) Fund Revenue: Revenues for FY 2018 -19 are expected to increase 134.9% from the FY 2017- 18 year end estimates with a $116,009 transfer from reserves to continue the communication master plan. 7 of 282 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Expenses: The PEG Fund FY 2018 -19 Budget increased $195,000 from the FY 2017- 18 year end estimates with the continued implementation of the communication master plan. Hotel Motel Tax Fund Revenue: Revenue for FY 2018 -19 is expected to increase 7.1 % from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimates with the addition of a new hotel in the city. Expenses: The Hotel Motel Tax Fund FY 2018 -19 Budget decreased 13.0% from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates. FY 2017 -18 included some improvements to the Civic Center which increased the budget higher than it is normally. FY 2018 -19 will decrease back to normal operating amounts. Park Fund Revenue: The revenue for FY 2018 -19 is expected to decrease 53.3% from 2017 -18 year end estimates with an expected reduction in new development to historic averages. As a project based fund, revenues are built up and collected in reserves then spent once they have reached a level to fund new projects. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget decreases 56.1 % from FY 2017 -18 year end estimates with the completion of the public restrooms at the library playscape. Tree Mitigation Revenue: The revenue for FY 2018 -19 is expected to decrease 30.6% from 2017 -18 year end estimate with an expected reduction in new development to historic averages. As a project based fund, revenues are built up and collected in reserves then spent once they have reached a level to fund new projects. Expenses: The FY 2018 -19 Budget will not change from the FY 2017 -18 year end estimate. The FY 2018 -19 Budget includes shade parks throughout the city. Library Fund Revenues: Revenue for FY 2018 -19 is expected to increase 47.3% from the FY 2017- 18 year end estimate with a transfer from reserves. Expenses: The Library Fund's FY 2018 -19 Budget increased 55.0% from the FY 2017- 18 year end estimates to purchase an additional $10,000 in library materials. Historical Committee Revenues: Revenue for FY 2017 -18 will remain at the same funding allocation as FY 2017 -18. Expenses: The Historical Committee's FY 2018 -19 Budget will remain the as the FY 2017 -18 Budget.1 8 of 282 9 -06 -2018 01:30 PM 101 - GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z PROPOSED BUDGET WORKSHEET AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018 PAGE: XXXX (-------------- 2017-2018 --------------- )(-------- 2018-2019 -------) 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 CURRENT Y -T -D PROJECTED CITY ADMIN. ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL YEAR END RECOMMENDED BUDGET REVENUE SUMMARY Taxes 17,781,462 18,449,210 19,581,110 18,222,897 19,774,050 21,519,002 Franchises 2,151,791 2,213,197 2,229,264 1,657,989 2,245,342 2,373,687 Permits 1,178,391 2,304,765 1,573,356 1,802,674 2,164,230 1,604,320 Licenses 55,657 63,164 51,160 59,080 71,460 56,760 Fees 2,474,121 2,661,261 2,126,546 1,921,480 2,461,676 1,843,973 Fines & Forfeitures 25,739 23,339 20,000 16,789 20,000 22,000 Inter - Jurisdictional 791,549 876,885 873,008 577,401 869,019 967,008 Fund Transfers 1,680,224 2,484,140 4,561,214 2,088,656 3,011,050 4,445,965 Miscellaneous 581,845 513,522 828,350 719,201 882,907 656,550 TOTAL REVENUES 26,720,777 29,589,483 31,844,008 27,066,167 31,499,734 33,489,265 EXPENDITURE SUMMARY GENERAL GOVERNMENT CITY COUNCIL 107,091 93,412 107,152 67,694 86,764 100,959 CITY MANAGER 831,754 1,077,769 1,130,180 1,034,191 1,318,103 1,161,522 MUNICIPAL COURT 341,361 342,228 375,407 279,904 374,340 346,940 CUSTOMER RELATIONS -311 109,464 117,777 117,469 93,776 123,665 121,957 PLANNING & ZONING 158,327 214,454 231,433 170,028 235,015 240,266 LEGAL SERVICES 130,364 150,698 160,000 74,266 138,000 160,000 GENERAL SERVICES 388,808 0 0 0 0 0 CITY SECRETARY 188,700 190,571 195,247 153,810 200,942 207,049 NONDEPARTMENTAL 2,312,517 2,352,849 2,723,762 2,008,000 2,413,089 2,853,931 PUBLIC AFFAIRS 294,498 319,030 318,344 230,618 308,117 644,841 RECORDS MANAGEMENT 60,172 47,680 66,109 47,778 62,107 0 SCHERTZ TALES MAGAZINE 363,697 348,796 395,483 290,821 379,100 0 ENGINEERING 208,652 540,453 659,326 481,824 679,527 739,220 GIS 151,610 163,735 169,488 133,428 175,061 175,311 TOTAL GENERAL GOVERNMENT 5,647,017 5,959,453 6,649,400 5,066,138 6,493,830 6,751,996 PUBLIC SAFETY POLICE 6,297,145 6,870,567 7,543,712 5,527,885 7,269,185 8,355,808 FIRE RESCUE 3,740,607 4,076,531 4,896,959 3,527,136 4,779,350 5,261,613 INSPECTIONS 639,528 811,916 948,947 624,120 940,277 895,579 MARSHAL'S OFFICE 731,166 481,980 490,472 284,965 378,038 0 TOTAL PUBLIC SAFETY 11,408,446 12,240,994 13,880,089 9,964,106 13,366,850 14,513,000 PUBLIC ENVIRONMENT STREETS 1,072,952 1,264,787 1,380,192 898,878 1,373,820 1,474,297 TOTAL PUBLIC ENVIRONMENT 1,072,952 1,264,787 1,380,192 898,878 1,373,820 1,474,297 9 of 282 9-06-2018 01:30 PM 101-GENERAL FUND FINANCIAL SUMMARY 2015-2016 ACTUAL C I T Y 0 F S C H E R T Z PROPOSED BUDGET WORKSHEET AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018 -------------- 2017-2018 --------------- 2016-2017 CURRENT Y-T-D ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL PROJECTED YEAR END PAGE: XXXX -------- 2018-2019 ------- CITY ADMIN. ADOPTED RECOMMENDED BUDGET PARKS & RECREATION PARKS 884,432 970,348 1,062,330 707,703 1,097,878 1,603,030 SWIM POOL 219,224 629,056 693,978 281,567 578,858 639,878 EVENT FACILITIES 133,485 117,289 151,974 86,711 144,232 425,605 TOTAL PARKS & RECREATION 1,237,140 1,716,693 1,908,282 1,075,980 1,820,968 2,668,513 CULTURAL LIBRARY 843,643 904,485 928,598 723,424 956,613 967,904 TOTAL CULTURAL 843,643 904,485 928,598 723,424 956,613 967,904 HEALTH ANIMAL SERVICES 536,235 555,661 620,571 302,536 523,987 500,269 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 0 204,879 280,576 164,166 222,453 0 TOTAL HEALTH 536,235 760,540 901,147 466,701 746,440 500,269 INTERNAL SERVICE INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 1,310,476 1,544,743 2,242,804 1,332,344 2,002,362 2,312,442 HUMAN RESOURCES 380,470 428,739 474,575 375,408 512,981 611,935 FINANCE 543,898 604,458 636,539 442,019 613,422 672,482 PURCHASING & ASSET MGT 144,318 191,858 250,455 153,587 240,251 226,299 FLEET SERVICE 707,160 695,951 792,133 538,756 788,318 875,043 BUILDING MAINTENANCE 402,276 1,405,157 1,453,183 991,356 1,434,915 1,542,419 TOTAL INTERNAL SERVICE 3,488,598 4,870,908 5,849,689 3,833,469 5,592,250 6,240,620 MISC & PROJECTS CITY'S ASSISTANCE 237,816 298,164 325,872 217,420 313,872 327,666 COURT-RESTRICTED FUNDS 5,324 357 21,983 0 17,820 45,000 TOTAL MISC & PROJECTS 243,140 298,521 347,855 217,420 331,692 372,666 TOTAL EXPENDITURES 24,477,171 28,016,380 31,845,252 22,246,118 30,682,462 33,489,265 REVENUE OVER/(UNDER) EXPENDITURES 2,243,607 1,573,103 1,244) 4,820,049 817,272 0) 10 of 282 9 -06 -2018 01:30 PM 101 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z PROPOSED BUDGET WORKSHEET AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018 PAGE: XXXX (-------------- 2017-2018 --------------- )(-------- 2018-2019 -------) 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 CURRENT Y -T -D PROJECTED CITY ADMIN. ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL YEAR END RECOMMENDED BUDGET 000 - 458650 NonResident User Fee -BVYA 10,120 000 - 458660 BVYA Utility Reimbursement 10,093 000 - 458670 SYSA Utility Reimbursement 0 000 - 458675 Lions Futbol Utility Reimbrsm 9,704 000 - 458700 Vehicle Impoundment 10,246 000 - 459200 NSF Check Fee 75 000 - 459300 Notary Fee 186 000 - 459400 Maps,Copies,UDC & Misc Fees 60 000 - 459600 Animal Adoption Fee 12,483 000 - 459700 Pet Impoundment Fee 11,128 000 - 459800 Police Reports Fee 5,577 000 - 459990 Fire - False Alarm Fee 0 TOTAL Fees 2,474,121 8,451 10,000 9,090 9,090 10,000 26,160 15,000 13,296 20,000 15,000 0 0 5,465 6,000 15,000 9,376 10,000 2,344 10,000 10,000 9,860 10,000 8,070 11,340 10,000 50 250 25 100 100 126 250 90 150 200 40 250 25 50 0 18,581 12,500 12,913 17,000 12,500 6,267 7,000 4,797 7,000 6,300 6,019 5,800 4,386 5,482 5,800 4,500 0 0 0 0 2,661,261 2,126,546 1,921,480 2,461,676 1,843,973 Fines & Forfeitures 000 - 463000 Library Fines 25,739 23,339 20,000 16,789 20,000 22,000 TOTAL Fines & Forfeitures 25,739 23,339 20,000 16,789 20,000 22,000 Inter - Jurisdictional 000 - 473100 Bexar Co - Fire 10,258 21,078 21,077 21,078 21,078 21,077 000 - 473200 City of Seguin -Fire Contract 28,110 29,231 29,231 21,923 29,231 29,231 000 - 473300 Guadalupe Co- Library 211,954 217,152 218,000 144,768 217,152 218,000 000 - 473400 Randolph AFB- Animal Control 2,100 1,200 1,200 200 1,200 1,200 000 - 474200 Library Services - Cibolo 35,000 35,000 35,000 35,002 35,000 35,000 000 - 474210 Library Services -Selma 31,540 31,540 20,000 21,750 21,750 22,000 000 - 474400 Dispatch Service - Cibolo 160,026 160,000 166,000 120,000 166,000 166,000 000 - 474600 School Crossing Guard - Bexar C 37,488 37,806 38,000 33,059 36,696 38,000 000 - 474610 School Cross Guard - Guadalupe 39,340 38,879 38,000 33,362 35,912 38,500 000 - 474620 School Crossing Guards - Coma 1,566 0 1,500 0 0 0 000 - 474700 School Officer Funding 184,167 255,000 255,000 127,500 255,000 348,000 000 - 474750 Crime Victim Liaison Agreemen 50,000 50,000 50,000 18,760 50,000 50,000 TOTAL Inter- Jurisdictional 791,549 876,885 873,008 577,401 869,019 967,008 Fund Transfers 000 - 480000 Indirect Costs -EMS 150,308 150,087 170,087 127,565 170,087 175,587 000 - 480100 Indirect Costs -Hotel /Motel 66,405 66,405 67,605 49,804 67,605 67,582 000 - 481000 Transfer In - Reserves 0 0 1,548,564 0 0 1,609,075 000 - 482100 Transfer In- Reserves -Ct Tech 0 0 0 0 0 26,207 000 - 485000 Interfund Charges- Drainage -5% 54,150 184,425 271,430 203,572 271,430 295,157 000 - 486000 Interfund Chrges -Admin W &S 1,152,350 1,186,812 1,344,140 1,008,105 1,344,140 1,365,998 000 - 486202 Transfer In- Water &Sewer Fund 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 000 - 486203 Transfer In -EMS 0 0 0 0 0 4,000 000 - 486204 Transfer In- Drainage 0 0 0 0 0 1,000 000 - 486402 Transfer from City Wide Projt 23 0 0 0 0 0 000 - 487000 Interfund Charges -Fleet 206,965 397,581 344,026 258,215 344,026 370,729 000 - 488000 Interfund Charges -4B 50,024 430,445 441,395 441,395 441,395 456,630 000 - 489000 Transfer In 0 68,385 108,967 0 107,367 70,000 000 - 489620 Contribution -SEDC 0 0 265,000 0 265,000 0 TOTAL Fund Transfers 1,680,224 2,484,140 4,561,214 2,088,656 3,011,050 4,445,965 Miscellaneous 13 of 282 9 -06 -2018 01:30 PM 101 - GENERAL FUND REVENUES C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z PROPOSED BUDGET WORKSHEET AS OF: JUNE 30TH, 2018 PAGE: X)§XX (-------------- 2017-2018 --------------- )(-------- 2018-2019 -------) 2015 -2016 2016 -2017 CURRENT Y -T -D PROJECTED CITY ADMIN. ADOPTED ACTUAL ACTUAL BUDGET ACTUAL YEAR END RECOMMENDED BUDGET 000 - 491000 Interest Earned 787 4,707 1,500 21,003 26,000 35,000 000 - 491200 Investment Income 74,650 136,001 150,000 167,013 180,000 200,000 000 - 491800 Gain /Loss ( 27,798) ( 1,421) 0 ( 16,042) ( 4,691) 0 000 - 491900 Unrealized Gain /Loss - Capone 11,003 ( 11,305) ( 30,000) ( 9) ( 20,000) 0 000 - 493000 Donations- Others 0 0 0 20 0 0 000 - 493120 Donations - Public Library 2,249 4,044 7,500 5,831 7,500 10,000 000 - 493400 Donations - Animal Control 211 18,191 15,000 12,296 15,000 15,000 000 - 493401 Donations -A /C Microchip 1,980 640 1,000 495 800 1,000 000 - 493402 Donations- Spay &Neuter 13,654 810 1,000 87 250 1,000 000 - 493403 Donation -A.S Adoption Trailer 2,222 552 0 0 0 0 000 - 493404 Donations -TNR Program 600 0 500 0 0 500 000 - 493460 Donations- Parks 0 13,741 12,000 10,825 12,000 10,000 000 - 493465 Donations- Senior Center 9,644 10,572 12,000 8,233 12,000 10,000 000 - 493502 Donations -PD 5,300 4,222 28,600 28,599 28,599 0 000 - 493503 Donation -Fire Rescue 0 9,541 15,350 15,350 15,350 0 000 - 493618 Donation - Veteran's Memorial 5,501 0 0 0 0 0 000 - 494481 LawEnforcemtOfficersStnd &Educ 3,851 3,679 3,650 3,823 3,823 3,650 000 - 494482 Grants - Police, Fire, Gen Fund 5,132 4,892 5,000 1,474 2,970 3,000 000 - 495100 Mobile Stage Rental Fees 2,100 1,550 0 2,100 2,100 2,100 000 - 497000 Misc Income -Gen Fund 55,367 ( 25,323) 30,000 68,703 80,000 45,000 000 - 497005 Schertz Magazine Advertising 196,500 186,000 195,000 108,055 143,665 140,000 000 - 497100 Misc Income- Police 18,494 17,866 18,500 4,367 4,750 3,800 000 - 497150 Misc Income -Fire Department 0 1,750 0 970 1,000 0 000 - 497200 Misc Income - Library 4,950 4,965 5,000 3,855 5,000 4,500 000 - 497210 Misc Income- Library Copier 20,194 18,187 18,000 14,220 18,000 18,000 000 - 497300 Misc Income - Animal Control 400 390 0 299 400 0 000 - 497400 Misc Income- Streets Dept 44,730 51,735 60,000 22,504 25,000 60,000 000 - 497500 Misc Income -TML Ins. Claims 4,088 9,252 10,000 33,051 40,000 20,000 000 - 497550 Misc Income -TML WC Reimbursmn 11,829 11,957 20,000 1,471 5,000 15,000 000 - 497600 Misc Income- Vending Mach 2,317 2,257 2,500 1,786 2,500 2,500 000 - 497610 Misc Income -Muni Court 0 0 0 2,036 2,036 0 000 - 498000 Reimbursmnt -Gen Fund 44,867 20,359 35,000 8,355 12,000 20,000 000 - 498100 Reimburmnt Fire- Training 6,017 7 500 0 500 500 000 - 498105 Reimbursmt Police OT -DEA 5,637 5,764 5,000 2,629 5,000 0 000 - 498107 Reimbrsmnt- Police OT- Events 3,500 0 0 0 0 0 000 - 498110 Reimburmnt Fire -Emg Acti -OT 51,868 3,267 200,000 179,446 250,000 30,000 000 - 498150 Reimbursement - Library 0 4,673 5,750 6,355 6,355 6,000 TOTAL Miscellaneous 581,845 513,522 828,350 719,201 882,907 656,550 TOTAL REVENUES 26,720,777 29,589,483 31,844,008 27,066,167 31,499,734 33,489,265 ---- -- -- --- ----- --- --- ---- -- - ---- -- --- ---- -- --- --- -- --- - ----- --- --- ------- ----- ----------- ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ----- - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- ------ - - - - -- 14 of 282 o * DEPARTMENT DESCRIPTION Prepare monthly financial reports for the City Manager, City Council and City departments. Process all accounts payable and receivable in a timely manner, post vendor payable check registers online, prepare 1099s, and prepare monthly bank reconciliations and investments report. Maintain and process payroll for all city employees and prepare W2s. Finance handles unclaimed property and their subsequent disbursements to the individuals or the State. Maintain and safeguard the City's investment portfolio. Manage debt service and fixed assets. Complete the annual budget and facilitate annual audit and Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Finance Director also oversees the Utility Billing and Municipal Court Divisions. GOALS AND OBJECTIVES • Hire, train, and retain competent and caring employees. • Maintain financial systems to provide timely and accurate financial information and reports to the City Manager, City Council, other City departments, citizens, and other agencies. • Receive the Government Finance Officers Association Distinguished Budget Award for the first time. • Receive the Government Finance Officers Association Certification of Excellence in Financial Reporting for the 31 st consecutive year. • Receive a Platinum Scorecard from the State Comptroller's Office for leadership in financial transparency. • Improve the 5 year budgeting and forecasting plan. • Update long term debt service plan. 145 of 282 Agenda No. 7 C X111 &WOU111►`[4Iady1DIU to] 710 Rod 1 City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Finance Subject: Resolution No. 18 -R -126 — A Resolution ratifying the property tax increase reflected in the Adopted Budget for FY 201.8 -19 In accordance with the Local Government Code Section 102.007(c), with the adoption of a budget that will require raising more revenue from property taxes than in the previous year, a separate vote must be taken to ratify the property tax increase reflected in the budget. This vote must be separate from the vote to approve the budget or adopt the tax rate. This is the first time the City of Schertz will ratify the property taxes reflected in the budget and will be a standard of operations going forward. FISCAL IMPACT This budget will raise more total property taxes than last year's budget by $1,442,093 or a 9% increase, and of that amount, $570,21.4 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council ratify the property tax increase as voted on and approved with the adoption of the FY 2018 -19 Budget. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 18 -R -126 RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -126 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS RATIFYING THE PROPERTY TAX INCREASE REFLECTED IN THE ADOPTED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 2018 -19, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Local Government Code Section 102.007(c) states when a budget will require raising more property taxes than in the previous year a vote separate from adopting the budget or tax rate must be taken to ratify the property tax increase; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City ratify the property tax increase in accordance with the Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to ratify the property tax increase. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby ratifies the FY 201.8 -1.9 Budget will raise more property taxes than last year's budget by $1,442,093 or a 9% increase, and of that amount, $570,214 is tax revenue to be raised from new property added to the tax roll this year. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which. this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this l lth day of September, 2018. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50506221.1 - 2 - Agenda No. 8 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Finance Subject: Ordinance No. 18 -T -33 — Consideration . and /or action approving an ordinance approving the appraisal roll; setting the tax rate; levying and assessing general and special ad valorem taxes for the use and support of the municipal government of the City of Schertz, Texas. Final Reading (B. James /J. Walters) BACKGROUND At the August 14, 2018 regular session, the City Council, by record vote, established a proposed preliminary maximum tax rate of $0.5146, per $100 of value, with the M &O rate at $0.3497 and the I &S portion of $0.1649. The proposed rate is not subject to rollback. In accordance with Chapter 26.05(d) of the State's Property Tax Code, a governing body must hold two public hearings on the tax rate if the proposed tax rate exceeds the lower of the Effective or Rollback Tax Rate. In this case the hearings were required as the proposed rate does exceed the effective rate. The two required public hearings were held on August 28, 2018 and September 4, 2018 during the regular session of City Council. During the tax rate adoption process Council can approve a lower rate than the preliminary maximum, however they will not be able to approve a higher rate without republishing the notices and holding additional public hearings. Due to timing constraints set by the State Tax Code 26.05(a), the latest council could set a new preliminary rate was August 14, 2018 without calling special meetings. Per Sec 26.05(b) of the Tax Code, the tax rate can only be adopted with more than 60% of the votes in favor of the proposed tax rate. Since Schertz has 7 voting councilmembers, 5 members must vote in favor of the tax rate for it to pass. The same is true even if some members are absent during the vote. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed maximum rate maintains quality service to residents and businesses and provides growth in service offerings based on input staff received from Citizens and Council from Retreats, Community Meetings, Citizen Survey, and elections. The current property tax rate is City Council Memorandum Page 2 $0.4910 per $100 valuation. The proposed maximum tax rate will be $0.5146 per $100 valuation. The M &O portion of the property tax rate will increase to $0.3497 from $0.3248 per $1.00 valuation. The I &S portion will decrease to $0.1649 from $0.1662 per $100 valuation. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve Ordinance No. 18 -T -33 approving the Fiscal Year 2018 -19 Proposed Tax Rate on final reading. THE MOTION MUST BE: "I move that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of ($0.5146), which is effectively a (5 %) increase in the tax rate." If a different tax rate is made in the motion, the percentage must be calculated over the effective rate of $0.4892. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 18 -T -33 ORDINANCE NO. 18 -T -33 DATE. PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PRO IDIN EFFECTIVE WHEREAS, the Acting City Manager of the City of Schertz submitted a tax rate proposal to the City Council prior to the beginning of the fiscal year, and in said tax rate proposal set forth the estimated necessary tax rate required to provide adequate revenues for the general use and support of the Municipal Government of the City of Schertz Texas; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that all provisions pertaining to the adoption of an ad valorem tax rate have been in all things complied with; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing was held by the City Council of the City of Schertz on the 28th day of August 2018 and a second Public Hearing was held on the 4th day of September 2018; and WHEREAS, after a full and final consideration, the City Council is of the opinion the tax rate and ad valorem tax appraisal roll should be approved and adopted; and WHEREAS, the taxes have been levied in accordance with the adopted 201.8 -1.9 budget as required by state law; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: SECTION 1. The ad valorem tax appraisal roll and effective tax rate information as presented by the tax assessor for the tax year 2018, . be and is hereby in all things approved and adopted. SECTION 2. This tax rate will raise more taxes for maintenance and operations than last year's tax rate. SECTION 3. The tax rate will effectively be raised by 8% and will raise taxes for maintenance and operations on a $100,000 home by approximately $25.90. SECTION 4. There is hereby levied and assessed and there shall be collected for the tax year 2018 for the general use and support of the Municipal Government of the City of Schertz, Texas a total ad valorem tax of Fifty -One Forty -Six Cents ($0.5146) on each One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of valuation of property — real and personal — within the corporate limits of the City of Schertz, Texas, subject to taxation. The assessment ratio shall be One Hundred Percent (100 %). SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, does hereby levy or adopt the tax rate on $100.00 valuation for this city for tax year 2018 as follows: 1. 0.3497 for the purpose of maintenance and operation 2. 0.1649 for the payment of principal and interest on debt 3. 0.5146 total tax rate SECTION 6. It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City Council that the phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance are severable, and if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section of the ordinance shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs and sections of this ordinance, since the same would have been enacted by the City Council without the incorporation in this ordinance of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph or section. SECTION 7. This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, and it is so ordained. SECTION 8. Ad valorem taxes for the year are due and payable on October 1, 2018 and shall become delinquent after January 31, 2019. A delinquent tax shall incur all penalty and interest authorized by state law, Section 33.01 of the Property Tax Code. Taxes that remain delinquent on and after July 1, 2019, incur an additional penalty of 15% of the amount of the taxes, penalty and interest due, such additional penalty to defray the cost of collection as authorized in Section 6.30 of the Property Tax Code. The City shall have available all rights and remedies provided by law for the enforcement of the collection of taxes levied under this ordinance. SECTION 9. Taxes are payable at the office of the counties of Comal, Bexar and Guadalupe. The Guadalupe Tax Assessor Collector handles all property taxes payable for properties in Schertz. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FIRST READING THIS 4th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018. PASSED AND APPROVED ON FINAL READING THIS 11th DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2018. Michael Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary Informational Only — 11 A CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 . Department: Management Subject: Pending Informational item status Below is a list of informational items that have been requested by Council and their proposed due dates: Workshop discussion regarding possible UDC amendments to allow for zoning of greenspace. (Requested by Mayor Pro- Tern Scagliola) Workshop discussion regarding the exploration regarding the use of HOT Funds to beautify Schertz. i.e., murals etc. (Requested by Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola) Workshop discussion regarding potential UDC code amendments regarding standards for sheds Workshop discussion and update from the Transportation Safety Advisory Commission regarding people parking in front of mailboxes (Requested by Councilmember Crawford) Item removed by Mayor Pro- Tern Scagliola on 9 -4 -2018 9 -1.1 -2018 to Council 9 -1.1 -2018 to Council To Council after TSAC Workshop Summary A CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: Animal Services Discussion and update regarding the Schertz Animal Adoption Center At the City of Schertz regular City Council meeting on September 4, several residents spoke of concerns they had observed at the Animal Adoption Center. These included unhealthy animals, unsanitary conditions and a general lack of cleanliness. Other issues were raised about animal intake, use of veterinary care and recognition and treatment (both acute and long term) of sick animals. City Council requested a workshop item to discuss these issues and others in more detail with staff. Staff is preparing a presentation to share several topics with Council including the issues raised by citizens, on -going issues with the Animal Adoption Center building, and results of the recent reorganization of Animal Services to the Police Department and what has been occurring since this reorganization. Staff will address intake procedures, partnerships with local communities, recent improvements in equipment availability for Animal Control Officers safety and proper procedures in the field and changes in how the Animal Adoption Center is cleaned. Staff will also present data on animal outcomes including adoptions, use of rescue organizations, animal deaths in custody and animals that have been euthanized. Staff will wrap up the presentation with a schedule of returning to Council for policy direction on determining how to proceed with sick and /or injured animals, resource needs and more follow up on overall operations of Animal Services. X111 13LY - - . ! m. - a E City Council Briefing VWILLDAN I Economists.com , '.•- Average utility has been increasing rates 5- 6% per year AWWA has stated that it expects water and ww rates across the USA to triple in the next 15 years Many reasons for rate increases are beyond a City's ability to influence Cities that jointly share facilities can have lower unit costs Conclusion: higher rates are an unfortunate but inevitable fact of life in USA WILL SAN I Economists.com Page: 2 COMMUNrTY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY City's long-term rate plan has been used to set annual rates and identify long-term. cost trends 7 City set initial plan in 2015 and adjusted it in 2016 and 2017 City prepares annual updates to rate plan • incorporate changes in several factors: F-i Account Growth ❑ Operating/SSLGC Costs ❑ Debt Issued to Fund CIP OVI LLDAN I Economists.com Page: 3 COMMUNMY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY 11 -- 5/8 Inch 21-- 3/4 Inch 31 -- 1 Inch 41 -- 1 1/2 Inch 51-- 2 Inch Compnd 61-- 2 Inch Turbine 71-- 3 Inch Compnd 81-- 3 Inch Turbine 91-- 4 Inch Compnd 101 -- 4 Inch Turbine 111 -- 6 Inch Compnd 121-- 6 Inch Turbine FH -- Fire Hydrants VWILLDAN I Economists.com ,, 23.89 10 5/8 Inch 35.82 20 3/4 Inch 59.70 30 1 Inch 142.84 40 1 1/2 Inch 228.53 50 2 Inch Compnd 285.66 60 2 Inch Turbine 457.06 70 3 Inch Compnd 685.59 80 3 Inch Turbine 714.16 90 -- 4 Inch Compnd 1,199.80 100 4 Inch Turbine 1,428.33 110 6 Inch Compnd 2,628.11 120 6 Inch Turbine 122.30 2=4 COMMUNMY SERVI E SCHIERIM I OPPORCTUNITY 28.94 46.76 77.93 155.85 249.36 311.71 498.73 748.09 779.27 1,309.16 1,558.53 2,583.51 11 5/8 Inch Blocks Inside City COMMUNrTY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY Outside Cjbj Block 1 - 6,000 $ 2.95 $ 6.21 Block 2 6,001 97000 3.00 6.28 Block 3 97001 127000 3.24 6.83 Block 4 127001 157000 3.50 7.33 Block 5 157001 18,000 3.71 7.75 Block 6 187001 307000 4.67 9.70 Block 7 307001 457000 5.30 11.01 Block 8 457001 607000 5.64 11.71 Block 9 607001 757000 5.85 12.11 Block 10 757001 Above 5.97 12.37 V/'WILLDAN I Economists co m Page: 5 Charge /1,000 Gal: Line Maintenance Fee User Charge Total 1-12,000 VWI LLDAN I Economists.com COMMUNrTY SERVI E OPPORCTUNITY Commercial/ Residential Institutions Institutions $ 11.72 $ 14.73 $ 14.73 0.46 0.55 0.55 3.58 3.58 3.58 4.04 4.13 4.13 8.76 8.84 8.84 2=10 COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHIERTZ I OPPORTUNITY $160.00 $140.00 $120.00 $1 00 .00 $90. $60. $40M $20. 4) 0 0 r- U) E M 4) E 0 0 > E F- < CD 4) 0 0 r- U) 4 M 4) E 0 > F- < CD 0 co > 0 0 m < 2 U) 4) >% r- 0 U) 4 M 4) C co > m < I], W"WILLDAN I Economists,,corn Page: 7 Source: TML 2018 Residential Rate Survey 20,000 18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 COMMUNITY SERVICE SCHHERTZ I OPPORTUNITY 2017 Forecast = 16,817 17,240 17,555 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 WILL SAN I Econornists .co nn Page: 8 71,191 -- 3-4 Inch 51,61-- 2 Inch 41-- 11/2 Inch ff�= mm� trolmm WILL SAN I Economists.com Page: 9 COMMUNrTY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY COMMUNMY � L R 4P PRTUNITY Operating /Capital Outlays $ 3,177,594 $ 3,402,120 $ 3,579,027 $ 3,771,126 $ 4,122,903 S S UGC /CV LG C 7,321,527 7,463,811 7,680,058 8,278,276 8,630,302 Debt Service 808,696 793,708 951,143 993,725 988,240 Total Cost of Service 11, 307, 818 11, 659, 639 12, 210, 229 13, 043,127 13, 741, 446 Operating /Capital Outlays CCMA Debt Service Total Cost of Service $ 3,128, 725 $ 4,246,137 1,103, 093 8,477,955 3,298,830 $ 4,452,230 1,095,258 "1 ILL )AN c sts4,,com Page: 10 3,465,809 $ 4,719,109 1,094,637 9,279,555 3,635,712 $ 3,935,078 4,938,427 5,163, 259 1,326,657 1,330,588 9,900,796 10, 428, 925 F- Utility's financial performance has exceeded forecast in following areas: r-i Account growth r-i Operating expense increases r-i New debt — amount and interest rates Because of City's better than forecast financial performance, 2018 rate adjustment can be less than forecast in 2017 W'WILLDAN I Economists.com Page: 11 COMMUNMY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY Base Charge Volume Ch 6,001 9,001 12,001 15,001 18,001 30,001 45,001 60,001 75,001 518" $ 314" 1" arge - 518, 314, 1 ° 6,000 9,000 12,000 15,000 18,000 30,000 45,000 60,000 75,000 Above Effective F+++ Current Oct -18 C Oct -19 Oct -20 23.89 $ 35.82 59.70 2.95 3.00 3.24 3.50 3.71 4.67 5.30 5.64 5.85 5.97 11.72 $ 0.46 3.58 4.04 8.76 24.61 36.89 61.49 3.04 3.09 3.34 3.61 3.82 4.81 5.46 5.81 6.03 6.15 12.54 0.49 3.83 4.32 9.37 Page: COMMUNITY C RT I IY ;.; 1 Oct -21 $ 25.34 $ 26.11 $ 38.00 39.14 63.34 65.24 3.13 3.22 3.18 3.28 3.44 3.54 3.71 3.82 3.94 4.05 4.95 5.10 5.62 5.79 5.98 6.16 6.21 6.39 6.33 6.52 $ 13.42 $ 14.36 $ 0.53 0.56 3.93 4.09 4.46 4.65 10.03 10.73 12 26.89 40.32 67.19 3.32 3.38 3.65 3.94 4.18 5.26 5.97 6.35 6.58 6.72 15.08 0.59 4.19 4.78 11.27 Water WW COMMUNrTY � L R 4P PRTUNITY Effective Current Oct -18 rOca t 21 518" Meter 5,000 5,000 $ 70.56 $ 73.95 Inc 3.39 518" Meter 10,000 5,000 Inc 1" Meter Business 30,000 30,000 Inc 2" Meter (Business) 120,000 120,000 Inc N&/WILLDAN I Economists,com 85.75 397.20 89.60 3.85 418.05 20.85 $ 76.69 $ 79.85 $ 82.47 2.74 3.15 2.63 1,641.14 1,731.13 89.99 Page: 13 92.81 3.21 438.13 20.09 96.45 3.64 460.04 21.91 99.57 3.12 477.99 17.95 1,824.66 1,924.60 2,005.98 93.53 99.94 81.38 Effective Water VwV Current Oct 1 8 518" Metier 5,000 W, 5,000 WW 2017 Rate Plan $ 70.56 $ 75.14 2018 Rate Plan 70.56 73.95 518" Metier I 0,opoW. 5,000 WW 2017 Rate Plan 2018 Rate Plan 85.75 85.75 V Meier (Business) 30,000 WWW 2017 Rate Plan 397.20 2018 Rate Plan 397.20 426.93 418.05 Oct 1 9 Oct-20 Oct-21 81.99 $ 84.51 76.69 79.85 82.47 94.93 92.81 449.33 438.13 4 473.71 460.04 102.28 99.57 1,875.34 1,984.85 2,056.41 1,824.66 1,924.60 2,005.98 COMMUNITY SERVI E OPPORCTUNrTY Prudent management by City sta�f has enabled magnitude of rate adjustments • be minimized Proposed rate plan will continue to enable water and wastewater utility to be financially independent and self- sufficient, and to invest in future of utility F Due to uncertain nature of growth, economy, weather and supply costs, recommend that one year rate plan b adopted and annual reviews continul 110/WILL SAN' I Economists.com Page: 15 COMMUNMY SERVI E SCHIERTZ I OPPORCTUNITY Workshop Summary C CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 Department: City Manager Discussion on the use of HOT funds to beautify Schertz, Murals, etc After seeing historic murals in New Braunfels, Councilman Scagliola asked for a presentation on the use of Hotel Occupancy Tax (HOT) funds for art. Chapter 351 of the Tax Code provides regulations on HOT funds, including their use in Section 351.101. Fundamentally, HOT funds must be used to promote tourism and the convention and hotel industry. This includes: (4) the encouragement, promotion, improvement, and application of the arts, including instrumental and vocal music, dance, drama, folk art, creative writing, architecture, design and allied fields, painting, sculpture, photography, graphic and craft arts, motion pictures, radio, television, tape and sound recording, and other arts related to the presentation, performance, execution, and exhibition of these major art forms; (5) historical restoration and preservation projects or activities or advertising and conducting solicitations and promotional programs to encourage tourists and convention delegates to visit preserved historic sites or museums: (A) at or in the immediate vicinity of convention center facilities or visitor information centers; or (B) located elsewhere in the municipality or its vicinity that would be frequented by tourists and convention delegates; New Braunfels provides HOT funds to an arts and heritage association for outdoor murals. An example of these are listed on the following page. Staff would propose to use HOT funds as part of the Main Street renovation project for a similar program and would suggest working with the Schertz Historic Preservation Committee to conduct tours of the murals once completed. City Council Memorandum Page 2 WALKING TOUR City of a Prince Our first mural, City of a Prince, portrays the founding of New Braunfels and was dedicated on March 21, t9gic commemorating the arrival of the settlers in isi s. it is painted by Texas Senate honored muralist and historian Clinton Baermann and is located on the building at the corner of West San Antonio Street and Castell Av- cnuc one block fram the main plaza. Lindheimer-Father of Texas Botany The Lindheirner mural, featuring the Father ol` Ten as Botany, was painted by San Anto- nio rriura€ artist, Ales; Brother. The mural was dedicated on PAay 21, 2ocin in celebration of Lindheimer's -,00th birthday and to honor his botanical achievements with avell over 50 plants bearing his name as well as starting the community's first German newspaper, that, although in English, still exists today. It is lasatcd at 165 S. Sequin Avenue, one half blue, from the main plaza. Lure of the Springs our third mura I, overlooking the pristine waters of the Cc mal River, is Lure of the Springs. This mural chronic Its the history and eternal beauty of the Cornal springs and river from prehistoric times to the development of Landa Industries, Also painted by Clinton Baermann, it war, dedicated on October 8, crco4 and is located on the Parks and Recreation building at the entrance of Landa Park- Windows inst Wurstfest The Windows into Wurstfcst mural Pays homage to the 10 days of the ultimate salute to sausage, beer and music. Our sth mural, painted by local artist Brent McCarthy, provides a glimpse into the fun, food and festivities during this once a year German tradition. it is located on Elizabeth Avenue near one of the Wurstfest entrances and was dedicated on October 18, 1010, Wustfest's 50th year celebration_ Spass and Gemutlichkeit rood, fun and festivity is celebrated in the Spass and cemutlich- ken: mural painted by local artist, Brent McCarthy. It pay, tribute to the beloved Krause's Cafe, a lcrcais gathering place for over 60 years, as well as New Braunfick'rich tradrtaon of sausage, bread, beer and wine- Dedicated on April ig, ecierr, it is located on Krause Strasse, next to the City of a Prince mural. Hermann Seale The Soul of New Braunfels Hermann Stele, the Soul of New Braunfels, was selected due to his di- Ycrxe contribution to the community aswcll as being the colony's first teacher in 1815. Located on the building at 146 North Cantil Avenue, this mural depicts Scale's life in five tiled panels. Original paintings were first created by Brent McCarthy, scanned and enlarged over 3ocr0% by Dan Tharp, transferred onto 8X2 inch bisque tiles, kiln fired three times at isms, degrees and installed by Kevin Aver This mural was dedicated on October 2-8, 2012. Workshop Session D CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: September 11, 2018 . Department: Council Subject: Workshop — Discussion and possible action regarding the minute transcription style of the official city council meetings BACKGROUND Goal At the City Council meeting of September 4, 2018 Councilmember Kiser requested a workshop discussion to explore the possibility of converting to action minutes as the official record for future city council meetings. The time it takes to process the type of minutes we currently do (paraphrasing) for one person it takes two (2) days, if two people work on the minutes it takes a full 8 hours. Note that if asked by Council and /or others to include "For the Record" this is where the verbatim information is processed. We have provided an example of action minutes that would be done for the last meeting of September 4, 2018. To condense, update and record the official city council meeting minutes in a manner conforming with all legal state law requirements and simultaneously minimizing staff man hours in compiling the official city record of council meetings. Community Benefit To present for public record a clear and concise document with the decisions reached and the actions taken at city council meetings. Summary of Recommended Action After discussion, provide the City Secretary Department direction on Council's desire for the style and content of future city council meeting minutes. It is the opinion of the City Secretary not to go to action minutes and continue trying to paraphrase what presenters /speakers say. It has been the practice for years that minutes be expanded more than just action minutes as it tells the history of why certain actions were taken. The current retention for DVD's of City Council meetings is five (5) years, but the City Secretary holds them for longer as there have been many times that DVD's of past years City Council Memorandum Page 2 have been requested. What happens if the medium for recording meetings changes? We would have to make available the ability to play, duplicate, etc. Writing the type of minutes we have are stored in our Records Management Software (Laser Fiche) what happens if these are lost, we would have the ability to go back to the paper printed/stored approved minutes. FISCAL IMPACT None ATTACHMENTS Definitions Minute Sample Copies Draft City of Schertz action minutes of 9 -4 -2018 Definitions*, Minutes serve to record what happened in a meeting, Opinion and speculation do not belong in the minutes of a meeting. There are three standard styles Of Minutes- action, discussion, and verbatim. Each style has as specific use. sure to record the speaker and the I'0CUS of the presentation as it concerns the topic. Verbatim minutes, like transcripts, are a record of every single word said at as meeting. They are ofien long and can be difficult to skim for as particular piece ofinformation. With the exception of'courtroom proceedings and Congress, a verbatim recore.1 (Y'a meetin is It, ," rareN necessarv, Verbatim minutes will not always follow the agenda, • Excerpt from the handbook (Texas Open Meetings Act Laws Made Easy (TML-TX Mun League) 2016 Editor • Keeping a Record of Open Meetings MINUTES REGULAR MEETING September 4, 2018 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on September 4, 2018, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1.400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Pro -Tem David Scagliola Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Cedric Edwards Councilmember Bert Crawford Staff Present: Executive Director Dudley Wait City Attorney Dan Santee Mayor Michael Carpenter was Absent. to Order — Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola called the Texas. (Counc Councilmember Edward; Flags of the United State Pro Tern S to Andre: SDanlev J Councilmember Mark Davis Kiser ames t to the City X retry Brenda at 6: Gonzalez opening prayer followed by the pledges of Allegiance to the National Payroll Week (M. Carpenter /Christine Bodily) read and presented the proclamation for National Payroll Week • EMS, Benjamin Potts, Paramedic • Public Affairs, Arturo Ortiz, Events Attendant — (Was not available to be introduced) • Public Works, Hector Mauldin & Trey Combs Water Serviceman I Each Department Supervisor introduced their new staff member(s) and provided a brief bio on them. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Council welcomed everyone on board. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -1- City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) Staff provided the following events: Wednesday, September 5th Blood Drive 8:00 am - noon Community Center Parking Lot Saturday, September 8th Paws in the Pool, Noon to 4:00 pm Pickrell Park Pool Tuesday, September 11' City Council Meeting 6:00 pm Council Chambers Thursday, September 13' Northeast Partnership Meetir Olympia Hills Golf Course and Friday, September 14th 2600 East FM 15 Join the Chambei Friday, Septemb Hearing of Residents newest member. the Acting City Manager (B. James) by the Mayor. (M. Carpenter) Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized the following who spoke: • Ms. Michelle Womack, 2944 Mineral Springs, who provided slides /pictures of various shelter animals this past week to show the current poor conditions in the shelter. She asked 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 2 - that her presentation be added to the official records of this council meeting. She was alerted to concerns earlier this year in June. Complaints were regarding poor treatment of staff, lack of cleanliness and a claim of animal dumping by the facility manager. She has submitted an open records request for which she is still waiting for a response. Animals continue to die (diseases /other medical issues) and be mistreated. She spoke of her visits to the shelter last weekend. She witnessed filth, sick and underweight animals, animals housed together when they didn't have to be and more. On Friday she requested a meeting with city management and th was concerned about the conditions but also concerned about lwo James listened. She wanted Council present to hear her concerns for following through with her request that the two animals have with her all weekend long and was at the facility on Saturday tryit on the conditions and direct staff on the two animals care. She c the two animals are improving and the facility is clean —like it current manager's employment with the city. The sick cat populati where she hopes and prays they will get the care -they need: However, there is still much more work that lacking in proper management and procedure been in the current condition 'that it is recommendations for either one of the 'two proper facility management, procedure and t condition. Animals will suffer and die. ;e councilmembers. She vmals in particular. Mr. She thanked Mr. James ,t care. He kept in touch to make improvements eeked this morning and ised tc, be, prior to the is area seeds tci' be done. It is evident the facility is There is Just no other way that it could have Saturday, Staff . was not following vet animals she concerned about. Without unina, the shelter will return to last week's Moving forward them are multiple things that must happen. A Schertz citizen needs to be placed on the Animal Advisory Board. Senior management needs to seek guidance from other local area facilities on proper cleaning and disinfectant policies as well as operational policies. Apermanent plan must be in place on handling sick animals when the facility is closed. Staff most be trained on the importance of following vet orders. The city must call for an immediate demotion or removal of the facility manager. All cats need to be tested and treated for various illnesses. Reinstate the observation and intake side of the facility to avoid introduction of illnesses and be able to observe pets with behavioral concerns. Return all vet care to the local area vets instead of pet shots. Reinstate positive relationships with local area rescue organizations that have worked with Schertz for years. Money needs to be spent where it needs to be spent —on animal care. Time cards should be reviewed by someone outside of the facility. Review of all procedures needs to occur from April 30th forward. Stop all transfers until sick animals are treated. Transfers should be 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 3 - from our smaller sister cities only —they don't have big budgets —they need us. All donations to the shelter should be removed from the general fund and put in a separate fund for medical needs. Accountability of the funds need to be made public. All rooms in the facility should be open to the public. Implement a dress code for staff, especially with whoever is manning the front desk. She leaves with a few questions. 1. Why is staff now calling the facility manager when she enters the building? 2. If there is nothing wrong at the building why has city senior management been scrambling all weekend over there to get things done. 3. When did the police department have to take over management of that department? 4. When did numbers, transfers, social media and moving animals become more important than providing for animals in our area, quality care and proper medical. treatment. In closing she asked council to demand permanent change and action from Mr. James. We can't sweep this under the rug. Animals are suffering, and lives are being:lost• She asked for the changes listed above to immediately b put into place. How we take care of them matters. Take a stand and demand action, make She thanked council for the opportunity to speak. Councilmember Edwards asked for a pc on the agenda and have a walk throe and the placement process a well as the Mr. James said they to next of privilege'. He asked if we could have this put of what is going on including the intake process aoval, of animals. Police Department do an overview in October; They will also cover the issues mentioned. Mr! Jeff Womack, 2444 Mineral Springs, who stated they had originally planned this so that if Michelle got ut off during her speaking opportunity (i.e. time limit) he could continue,, He thanked them for hearing her out and he thanked Mr. James for all he did this weekend. However, he did want to speak on items 8 and 9. He believes we need to keep moving forward and investing in Schertz. In northern Schertz, Wiederstein Road is a big topic. A lot of folks Aive Old Wiederstein (known as Bagdad Highway) on a daily basis. He spoke of the deplorable driving conditions; he implores them to get this fixed. • Ms. Fae Simmons, 1216 Cyrus McCormick, who spoke of reading some things on social media regarding the animal shelter and she found them disturbing. She shared an experience she had with the shelter two years ago which was positive. Her concern is what she experienced 2 years ago and what she is hearing now. She offered another solution. • Ms. Maggie Titterington, The Chamber President, spoke about a public open house EDC had and she thanked city staffers. She also thanked staffers for assisting in the opening of 09 -04 -2018 Minutes page - 4 - Simmons Real Estate. The monthly Chamber Luncheon will be held on September 18 and the topic will be Successful Companies Develop Successful People. Direct Development CEO Craig Krause will speak. He will then return two days later to teach a business education class called `Creating your own Solutions." It is free to members (non- members $20) and will be held at the Civic Center. • Brent Bolter, 2633 Cloverbrook Lane, who stated he was present on June 9 at the council meeting when Mr. Hernandez came and spoke about his wife who worked for the city at the shelter for almost ten years. So, we were warned. Now this evening we are shown the ramifications, in his opinion, of not taking Mr. Hernande's comments seriously. We should have paid attention and we didn't. The pictures shod tonight speak for themselves. We all know that the buck stops at whoever is in charges that is where the responsibility is. Ms. Womack made her recommendation and he thinks manag scut needs to take that seriously. Again, on June 12 we were warned; now, are °in September, and it happened. Shame on all of us for not getting more engagedt . • Ms. Brenda Dennis, speaking for Ms. Dawn M Whitaker, who asked that her concerns be put inadequate conditions at the Animal Shelter. Her kept in a sanitary condition and many of the at medical care. She has not witnessed this = herself from other citizens. She understandsnianagenieni like to know what the current conditions are and 2014 . and would like to know that any, Other fut healthy and the community,, s resources an " • Mr. Grumpy Azzilmr 528 Wayward Pass, remember, that facility was infested with really, a to today, it tip not fired; what he reall the city and decided this in to New B He encourage residents, the okay to vote official. Consent Agenda Items tchell (not able to attend tonight), 3805 on public record regarding the current understanding is that the facilities are not imals, are ',injured or sick and in need of but has received photos and information has changed at the facility and she would why, it is that way. She adopted a dog in ire 'antmals that are adopted by folks are zsed efficiently and wisely. ,aid he loves animals and he stated if you He has pictures and you all know that and A to say is he has been in the city since 1.980 -81. He fell in love here. 14 e met a lot of people, attended a lot of functions, and now week to say their goodbyes to the City of Schertz and they are (ETJ). .zncit to `get united' again. Your number one priority is to take care of the and city staff. No one should have a special agenda. Fix the issues; it is conscious. It is not a job, it is a public service! You are an elected public Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola read the following. 1. Minutes — Consideration and /or action regarding the approval of the minutes of the meeting of August 28, 2018. (B. Dennis) 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes page - 5 - The following was read into record. Approval of the August 28, 2018 regular meeting minutes. 2. Ordinance No. 18 -M -30 — Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance amending the City Council Rules of Conduct and Procedure related to the appointment of the Mayor Pro -Tern Position. Final Reading (B. Dennis /Mayor- Council) The following was read into record. ORDINANCE NO. 1 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SC CITY COUNCIL RULES OF CONDUC ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EF 3. Ordinance No. 18 -M -31 - Conn the City Council Code of Ethics Reading (B. Dennis /Mayor -Coup The following was read into record. M PROCEDURE; :S',,, .IN CONFI AMENDING ALING ALL XITH THIS and/or action approving an Ordinance amending to the procedure for conducting inquiries. Final O. 18 -M AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TX AMENDING CITY COUNCIL CODE, OF ETHICS; AMENDING SECTION 3 PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING INQUIRIES REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANC S LN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE 'bATE 5. Resolution No. 18.1.21 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution . authorizing the Acting City Manager to reject all proposals received for the 2018 Drainage Maintenance Projects ( #,201.8- 0723). (D. Wait /D. Letbetter) The following Was read into record. RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -121 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE ACTING CITY MANAGER TO REJECT ALL PROPOSALS RECEIVED FOR THE 2018 DRAINAGE MAINTENANCE PROJECTS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS ( #2018- 0723 -1) 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 6 - 6. Resolution No. 18 -R -122 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing an amendment to the Community Development Block Grant Program Cooperative Agreement with Bexar County. (B. James /S. Gonzalez) The following was read into record. RESOLUTION NO. 18 -R -122 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT EMENT WITH BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Crawford `w it asked that items 4 and 7 be removed for short discussion. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who moved seconded by Councilmember Gutierrez to approve consent item, ms i -1"'5'&,6. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion Passed. Discussion and Action Items 4. Resolution No. 18 -R -108 — Consideration and/or- , action approving a Resolution authorizing a contract with Armstrong aughn & Associates for auditing services. (B. James /J. Walters) The following was read into record. LUTION NO. 18 -R -1.08 LUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS RIZING A CONTRACT WITH ARMSTRONG VAUGHN & ASSOCIATES DITING SERVICES. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Crawford who had asked that this item be pulled, from cbnsent. Councilmember Crawford requested Mr. Walters go over the process we are going to go through to select another accounting firm during the next year. Mr. Walters briefly explained the process for selecting a firm for providing the city auditing services which was vetted and recommended through the Auditing Committee. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Gutierrez who moved seconded by Councilmember Davis to approve Resolution No. 18 -R -108. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion Passed. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 7 - 7. Ordinance No. 18 -S -29 – Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance regarding a request of a Specific Use Permit and associated conceptual site plan to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps on an approximate 0.93 -acre site. The property is more specifically described as Lot 6, Block 2 of the Tri- County :Business & Industrial Park Unit IA Subdivision; City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas; located at 17501 IH 35. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/E. Grobe) The following was read into record. ORDINANCE NO. 18 -S -29 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE' CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS TO APPROVE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR OPERATION OF A CONVENIENCE STORE WITU GAS PUMPS AT 17501 111 359 SCHERTZ, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Crawford who had asked that this item be pulled from consent. Councilmember Crawford would like to ask" staff to work with council to an extent in the future about looking at the UDC, procedures, and rules we have for density of land use, so we dot 't have six gas stations (restaurants, or whatever) in one corner. He just feels we need to have I a discussion about the use I of our land. applicant r`cpreentativc ,Karen Mitchell came forward and acknowledged the drainage Lem and stated they must :follow the requirements of TxDOT. They will not make ors worse in that Location. They will do the best they can within TxDOT requirements. Mr. Edwards brought up the dumpster problem one more time and stated he feels it should be relocated. He wants his concern on record and he is concerned about the beauty of the city. It is economically feasible, and he is okay with that. The dumpster location is his only problem. Ms. Mitchell addressed this by saying if they relocate the dumpster it will actually pose more of a safety situation for the employees of 7- Eleven at night that have to take the trash out because it would not be monitored —thus the reason for locating it in a sight monitored location. It would ultimately fall to the property owner to get any illegal dumping picked up. Council engaged in more discussion regarding the number of business types allowed in the city in that council doesn't regulate that. Acting City Manager Brian James said the zoning of areas in the city regulates that. In this case the zoning stipulates they need to ask for a specific use permit and the ordinance lays out the criteria and council can say yes or no to it. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page - 8 - In his time here, staff has left the decision of the number, types of businesses to the market. If they feel they can compete, let them compete. Staff has not gotten the impression council wanted them to look at do we have too much of a certain type of business in the city. Councilmember Kiser asked who would be responsible if someone dumped some large items by the dumpster. Answer was the business, 7- Eleven. Councilmember Crawford stated he takes a little bit of exception to what Mr. James says. He spent six years on the Planning and Zoning Commission (P &Z= He spoke of an occasion where the board declined an application for a special use permit for' °a gas station similar to this item. However, he feels six gas stations in one area is a bit high. He doesn't know what else can be there. He just wanted to point out that P &Z has declined a gas station before. following A Budget for FY 2018-49` Conduct a public hearing and regarding thq adoption of the FY 2018 -19 Budget. (Second Tames /J. Walters) and/or action approving an Ordinance on the g (B. James /J. Walters) ORDINANCE NO. 18 -T -32 AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A BUDGET FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING OCTOBER 1, 2018, AND ENDING SEPTEMBER 30, 2019, IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS; PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF THE BUDGET; PROVIDING THAT THIS ORDINANCE'' SHALL BE CUMULATIVE OF ALL ORDINANCES; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized Acting City Manager Brian. James who provided a power point presentation with highlights from the approved 2018 Strategic Plan. (A copy is available on line): Mr. James provided proposed cuts that could be made. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -9- Mr. James provided three options Council could consider: Option 1. Adjust our budget assumptions — assume higher revenue and /or lower expenses Option 2. Quickly make cuts to programs and departments to increase funding =for maintenance and maintain the current tax rate. Option 3. (Staff recommends) Approve the proposed tax increase to immed expanded programs designed to increase effectiv( the next year. Mr. James provided information on Staff recommends council • M. Michelle Womack, 2944 Mineral Springs, stated she supports the tax increase. • Mr. Ferndo Heyward, 2628 Hansel Heights, supports the City and its staff and commended them on the budget presentations and the work they did for those budget/community meetings. He also supports the increase. • Mr. John Sullivan, 513 Triple Crown, echoed the appreciation of staff and the budget preparation materials, increased transparency for the funding and in particular the need for maintenance of the city facilities, parks and roads. As no one else spoke, Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola closed the public hearing for council comments. 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - 10 - Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized Acting City Manager Brian James who provided more information for the sake of transparency. Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized the councilmembers who once again provided their commentary regarding the proposed budget. Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola stated he thinks we do this budget talk and tax rates backwards. He provided his comments concerning the proposed budget. Other council commentary followed. Mayor Pro -Tern Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwardshci moved seconded by Councilmember Kiser to approve Ordinance No. l -T -32 first reading., , The vote was 5 -2- 0 with Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Councilmember Larson voting no: Motion Passed. 9. Public Hearing on Proposed Tax Rate — Conduct'a public hearing and consideration. PH and /or action regarding the adoption of the FY 2018 4 ' Tax Rate. (Second required public hearing) (B. James /J. Walters) Ordinance No. 18 -T -33 — Consideration and/or, action approving an Ordinance on the proposed FY 2018 -19 Tax Rate. First Readin '(8. 3` es,11 Walters) The following was read into record. INANCE NO. 18 -T -33 Mayor Pro -Texo Scagliola recognized Acting City Manager Brian James who stated that currently where, we are is our tax rate is $0.4911 per $100 evaluation, we are looking to go up to $0.5146. ,;Again, we allocate the Maintenance and Operation (M &O) rate at $0.3497 and the I &S portion of $0.1649. The proposed rate is not subject to rollback. Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola recognized Finance Director James Walters who stated that there is a specific motion that must be made when adopting the tax rate as well as a minimum number of Councilmembers that need to vote in favor for the motion to pass. Since we have seven councilmember we need five councilmembers to vote in favor of any motion and the motion must be what is stated on the screen, which read "I move that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of (0.5146), which is effectively a (5 %) increase 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page - It - to the tax rate ". So, it stated the tax rate that the councilmember is proposing and then a percentage increase over the effective rate of $0.4892. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola opened the public hearing and recognized the following: Mr. John Sullivan, 51.3 Triple Crown, who stated that he is for the increase. As no one else spoke, Mayor Pro-Tern Scagliola closed the public hearing for council comments. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Larson; who clarified his statement earlier. The rollback rate is not really a compromise, that's lite'rally the highest we can go without giving citizens a chance to recall it. He provided further comments. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola asked if there were further comments and as there were none he stated we have come to the point where we need to make a motion. He stated that he is partial to $0.4910. He asked Mrti )A council needs to read back on the overhead. Mayor interesting is regardless, this is a tax increase. He asked"! what a $0.4911 increase would be Mr., Walters stated would be a .3% percent increase. Maydr''P"rgrTem S( current rate is. Mr. Walters answered ves. .hers to put the statement that the Tem Scagliola stated that what's r. Walters to assist in figuring out hat if we went to the $0.4910 it 21161 asked if that is what our Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola Moved seconded`by Councilmember Larson that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of ($0.4910), which is effectively a (.3 %) increase in the tax rate. The vote 2-5 -0 with Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Councilmember L , .son voting for and Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for. 1#otion Failed. Pro -Tem Scagliola called for another motion. Mayor. Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who moved seconded by Councim ember Kiser that the property tax rate be increased by the adoption of a tax rate of ($0.5146) which is effectively a (5 %) increase in the tax rate. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Edwards who stated that he recognized to the citizens that will view this later that he understands he is raising his own taxes and the citizens taxes. He will hold staff accountable for them to streamlining and coming to efficiencies, but realize he is aware of what he is doing. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola called for the vote. The vote was 5 -2 -0 with, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Edwards, Kiser and Crawford voting for and Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola and Councilmember Larson voting no. Motion Passed. Roll Call Vote Confirmation 09 -04 -201.8 Minutes Page -12 - City Secretary Brenda Dennis provided the Roll Call Vote Confirmation for agenda items 1 -9 Workshop • Discussion and possible action regarding the City of Schertz Interview Committee. (B. Dennis) (Item requested by Council to be brought back) Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized City Secretary Brenda Dennis who provided information on a possible change and recommendation of 'a change in the interview committee explaining why it would be efficient and fait'. Ms. Dennis opened it up to Council for discussion and to let her know what they would like o do. Members of Council provided their thoughts for consideration of' tho past situation that occurred and provided their thoughts regarding the Interview Committee makeup. After much discussion, it was the consensus after discussion to make no chang ,,to the current make up of the Interview Committee. Closed Session 1.0. City Council will meet in closed s Code, Personnel Matters to d reassignment, duties, discipline, or Council did not • Announcements by Section 551,074 of the Texas Government appointment, employment, evaluation, ames recognized Direeto of Planning and Community Development Lesa Wood who my one item on the agenda. Today is her birthday, but she wanted to be here in case irag popped up. As it was"Planner I Emily Grobe was able to handle it all just fine. o§ to Lesa for her dedication. • Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items be placed on a future City Council agenda. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola recognized Councilmember Kiser who requested an item for the next agenda to discuss the possibility of moving to action minutes rather than the current verbatim minutes we are doing. Councilmember Crawford requested an item on the next agenda regarding a discussion on the Animal Services Department. 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -13 - Councilmember Davis requested an item regarding green space. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola stated staff had answered his concerns on that so he did not ask for it to be put on. Councilmember Davis then asked for an information item for the council packet next time on the matter. • Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers Councilmember Davis stated he recently had -a wonderful tour off li children's area of the Library. They are doing some great things there. Councilmember Gutierrez stated he attended. the TML, Regional meeting and Alan Cockerell's retirement gathering and wanted to soy Thank You for his service. Mayor Pro -Tem Scagliola also, attended Mr. Cockerell's retirement. He gave exceptional service to us and Seguin and Cibolo. His talents ill definitely be missed. Councilmember Edwards reminded his colleagues to look at the TML updates because they are trying to force things on cities and tell n how to run our cities. We need to look at this an be versed,on it for the future. 11. Information available in Citv Council Packets -NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR • Monthly update on Large prdjeets /IP. (D. Wait /J. Harshman /T. Buckingham) Pending Brenda Dennis, City Secretary 09 -04 -2018 Minutes Page -14 - CITY C*UR JULY 12,2018 CITY COUNCIL Susan Sample, Mayor Wayne J. Franklin, Mayor Pro Tern Bob Higley, Councilmember Kellye Burke, Councilmember Mardi Turner, Councilmember STAFF M. Chris Peifer, City Manager Alan Petrov, City Attorney Thelma Gilliam, City Secretary Mayor Sample called the meeting to order at approximately 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Council and Staff in attendance were: Councilmembers, Burke, Higley, and Turner, City Manager Peifer, City Attorney Petrov, City Secretary Gilliam, Police Chief Walker, and Pubic or s ire or Beach. Mayor Pro Tern Franklin was absent. 1. gutiye Sessi2p afters related to consultations with the city attorney regarding pending legal matters. At 6:01 p.m., Councilmember Higley moved to recess the special meeting and convene into Executive Session in accordance with Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. Councilmember Turner seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Sample, Burke, Higley, Turn Noes: None Absent: Franklin Mayor Sample closed the Executive Session and reconvened the special meeting at 6:31 p.m. • Action Taken. At 6:31, p.m, Councilmember Higley moved to adjourn the special meeting. Councilmember Turner seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED. Ayes: Sample, Burke, Higley, Turner Noes: None Absent: Franklin /Z7 MINUTES CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF UNIVERSAL CITY, TEXAS ' Regular Meeting ", Tuesday, August 21, 2018 2. QUORUM CHECK: Kristin Mueller, City Clerk r� Mayor Williams introduced Christine Bodily, Denise Kelley, Emma Jackson, and the Alamo Chapter of American Payroll Association. City Council read a proclamation declaring the first week of September 2018 National Payroll Week in Universal City, Texas. Mayor Pro Tem Neville moved to approve the minutes of the Monday, July 30, 2018 City Council Special Meeting, Tuesday, August 7, 2018 Regular Meeting, and Tuesday, August 16, 2018 Special Meeting. Councilmember Maxwell seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Neville, Maxwell, Goolsby, Najarian, Shelby, Volle Nays:None F-INEENUOIttYA# W21192-1121,11;W CITYOF UNNIXTERSAL CITY PROPOSED 201.8-2019,BUDGE'r SUNNI_: — A L L FUNIN DS mm� Ending Estiinated Transfers Proposed Transfers Balanct Fund Revenues In ExIoenditures Out, Sept. 30tt 2019 General S1 3,4 3, 8 S36,972 S 12,886,813 $56,967 $60,979 Debt set-vice 2,530,775 D 1-857,244 491,972 181,559 Capital Projects 21,600,322 562,967 3,161289 0 0 ITtifity 12,054-,296 0 t1,78D,64-9 0 273,1647 Stormwater 71-2,806 0 712,806, 0 0 of our 1fi0fi,974 455,000 2,037267 0 24,707 Tatal Funds $532,978,960 S 1,054,939 532 438,069 S1,054,939 5-540,892 There being no comments, he closed the public hearing at 6:48 p.m. B. PUBLIC HEARING on the Proposed 2018 Tax Rate to Support the Fiscal Year 2019 Budgets. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing on the Proposed 2018 Tax Rate to support the Fiscal Year 2019 Budgets at &54 p.m. j� 'vrmm It K MortmaKe, Me goal is to continue to conaltion File ainiefes to 1OQK 10 Onivel-571 klty to TOM TnEM- sport facility needs. Development Corporation to expend up to $23,000 for sponsorship of the T Cal tournaments Councilmember Najarian seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Shelby, Najarian, Neville, Goolsby, Maxwell, Volle Nays:None D. Consider the UCEDC Board's Recommendation to Expend up to $325,000 for an Economic Development Incentive at 3150 Pat Booker Road, Suite 108. OWN I NA W- I I W I W* r-Am- requirements, the pricing structure, and revenue projections. He will be spending approximately $2,500,000 on the entire project. He also stated that this facility would be the first of its kind in Universal City, but he does have two other locations. He anticipates that the Universal City location could open in approximately six months. i % :1 - • - - I I r up to $325,000 for an economic development incentive at 3150 Pat Booker Road, Suite 108. Councilmernber Shelby seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Maxwell, Shelby, Neville, Goolsby, Najarian, Volle Nays:None WWT-W- Atli 1114=9 r, i r—M W We llll� 111101 WWWWOW-1 11111 Mw Ow- W IN I - expenditures for the UCEDC budget is $3,905,897. Councilmember Maxwell moved to approve the UCEDC Board's FY 2019 Budget� Councilmember Volle seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Maxwell, Volle, Neville, Goolsby, Najarian, Shelby Nays:N•ne "M 9 SUR: T. Herrera 28.1270 AC & ABS: 153 SUR: T. Herrera 24.0520 AC, Guadalupe County ID 64638 & 64639) from AC Aviation Commercial to MDR — Medium Density Residential. Ms. Turner stated that several years back JBSA-Randolph requested that City Council classify the extra-territorial iurisdiction as Aviation Commercial. For the last two vears, the current land III I 1111 11 :�, Ili III IN: 111 1- 1 in %-- a r., a ETT R-4 as Medium Density Residential. A compromise has been reached. She also noted that the Planning and Zoning Commission approved the proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Plan. Mayor Williams opened the public hearing at 7:34 p.m. Ms. Turner explained that a public hearing is not a questioning and answering session, but a time for citizens to make comments for • against the proposed FLUP change. Vote: Yeas: Shelby, Neville, Goolsby, Maxwell, Najarian, Volle Nays-None M tr Adjustments. v m '41mor Xitalml-I 11willi pailm It rA Awmw a x I IL40 11 111r ads jug Vote: Yeas: Maxwell, Shelby, Neville, Goolsby, Najarian, Volle Nays:None J. Consider Approval of Pay Estimate #1 invoice for the Parkview Estates Drainage Improvements Phase 13 — Construction. Public Works Director Randy Luensmann asked city council to consider the approval of Pay Estimate #1 invoice for the Parkview Estates Drainage Improvements Phase 13, payable to J3 Company in the amount • $106,450.83. Vote: Yeas: Goolsby, Neville, Maxwell, Najarian, Shelby, Volle Nays: None K. Consider Annual Bad Debt Write Off, Period 10/2016 — 9/2017. 6 1 Room- M 11" continue. or Yeas: Shelby, Volle, Neville, Goolsby, Maxwell, Najarian Nays: None A. Discuss & Consider Ordinance 217-0-2018: An ordinance amending Ordinance 217, Penalty Ordinances, and the Universal City Code of Ordinances, Section 3-4-8 — Spee.1 Limits generally and the replacement thereof. (Second Reading). 0 Councilmember Maxwell moved to approve Ordinance 217-Q-2018. Councilmember Goolsby seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Maxwell, Goolsby, Neville, Najarian, Shelby, VolM B. Discuss & Consider Ordinance 1 50-K-201 8: An Ordinance Repealing Ordinance 150-17- 98, Amending Ordinance 150 and Ordinance 150-G-00, to remove school zones areas within the City of Universal City and amending the Universal City Code of Ordinances accordingly. (Second Reading). seconded the motion. Vote: Yeas: Maxwell, Shelby, Neville, Goolsby, Najarian, Volle A Councilmernber Najarian questioned the process for contractors to become licensed in Universal City and asked for City staff to review the process and make it simpler. 13. MAYORAL COMMENTS: Kristin Mueller, City Clerk F9 The meeting was called to order by Mayor Pro ?—© Peters in the New Braunfels Municipal Building City Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. Councilmember Garcia gave ihe invocation, and Mayor Pro Tern Peters led the Pledge of Allegiance and the Salute to the Texas Flag. . . ...... . .. .... .......... . .... Discuss and consider approval of the minutes of the regular meeting of May 23, 2016, and the special meeting of May 27, 2016. Mayor Pro Tern Peters read the aforementioned caption. A motion was made by Coen cillmember Green, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, that this item be approved. The motion passed vi712 e following vote- In Favor: Couhcilmember Reaves, Councilmember Green, Councilmember Meadows, Councilmember Monceballez, Mayor Pro Tem Peters, and Councilmember Garcia Bill Norvell spoke regarding an incident on the river, and commended the Police Department on their handling of the situation, Jay Harmon spoke regarding flooding issues in New Braunfels affecting Lake Dunlap. MENEM K116-1 MRIANY C) Approval of an annual contract for the purchase of green waste bags from Safeway Supply, Inc. for the Public Works department. -'r In I I I'll, III 11111 11 x IIII;IIII Iggill 111111: 11 G) Approval of the second and final reading of an ordinance rezoning approximately 1.0 acre out of the A-608 J Thompson Survey 2 1, located in the 2300 block of IH-35 South, from "R-2" Single-family and Two-family District to "C-1 B" General Business District. F) Approval of a budget transfer in the FY 2015-16 Juvenile Case Manager Fund. kIRT-217" S lgl, n 1�tll N In Favor: Council ember Reaves, Councilmernber Green, Councilmernber Meadows, Councilmember Monceballez, Mayor Pro Tern Peters, and Council member Garch Mike Mundell presented the item. Christopher Looney presented the item. Teresa Gomez, Kendra Wray, Emmitt Vaughn, Michelle Nixon, Stephanie 1s k, and Mike Smithers spoke during the public hearing. Mayor Pro Tem Peters read the aforementioned caption. A motion was- rnade by Councilmember Meadows, seconded by Councilmember Green, that this item be postponed to the June 27, 2016City Council meeting. The motion passed via the following vote: , In Favor: Councilmember Reaves, Councilmember Green, Councilmember Meadows, Councilmember Monceballez, Mayor Pro Tem Peters, and Councilmember Garcia D) Public hearing and consideration of the first reading of an ordinance regarding a Type 2 Special Use Permit to allow multifamily to be developed on approximately 1 .58 acres, addressed at 274 E. Garza Street, in the "C-IA" Neighborhood Business District. The applicant has officially amended their request for the Special Use Permit to allow for one single family residence on the property. EPSON 111111pJ111,1111111111gig SIMM , Mayor Pro Tem Peters read the aforementioned caption. A motion was made by Councilmember Moncebaliez, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, that this item be approved as amended by the applicant. The motion passed via the following vote: F) Presentation and discussion regarding the FY 2015-16 second quarter financial report. 7113*77%11�� =I G) Presentation, discussion and approval of the City of New Braunfels IFY 2015-16 Second Quarter Investment Report Martle Simpson presented the item. Mayor Pro Tern Peters read the aforementioned caption. A motion was made by Council member Reaves, seconded by Council member Green, that this its be approved. The motion passed via the following vote: In Favor: Councilmember Reaves, Councilmember Green, Councilmernber Meadows, Councilmernber Monceballez, Mayor Pro Tern Peters, and Councilmernber Garcia Martie Simpson presented the item. Mayor Pro Tern Peters read the aforementioned caption, A motion was made by Councilmember Reaves, seconded by Councilmember Garcia, that this item be approved. The motion passed via the following roll call vote: 72s >;►, !IM� IMIC 111311111111 1 1 111 1 1! Valeria Acevedo presented the item. Mayor Pro Tern Peters read the aforementioned caption. A motion was made by Councilmember Garcia, seconded by Councilmember Monceballez, that this item be approved. The motion passed via the following vote.- In Favor: Councilmember Reaves, Councilmember Meadows, Councilmember Monceballez, Mayor Pro Tern Peters, and Councilmember Garcia Opposed: P-.*j-uarjJj= In accordance with Texas Government Code, Subchapter D, the City Council may convene in a closed session to discuss any of the following items; any final action or vote taken will be in public. Im 6. INTO OPEN SESSION AND TAKE ANY NECESSAI;;VT' ACTION RELATING TO THE EXECUTIVE SESSION AS DESCRIBED ABOVE. M f 0 a " 11 - mim 11, a "W'' fl, V Date Approved: June 27, 2016