ccspecwksp 09-01-1999
.
SPECIAL WORKSHOP SESSION OF THE SCHERTZ CITY COUNCIL
SPETEMBER 1,1999
The Schertz City Council convened in Special Workshop Session on Wednesday,
September 1, 1999 at 7:00 p. m. in the Conference Room of the Municipal
Complex, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz Texas. Those present were as follows:
Mayor Hal Baldwin presiding; Ken Greenwald; Pia Jarman; Reginna Agee; Glyn D.
Williams and Joe Potempa. Staff present were City Manager Kerry Sweatt, Mark
Marquez; L.J. Cott; Juan Santoya and Deputy City Secretary Dolores Butler.
Due to the absence of Mayor Baldwin, Mayor Pro-Tern Potempa called the
meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
#1 HEARING OF RESIDENTS
No one had signed up to speak.
Mrs. Jarman asked to present her position as to the proposed budget regarding
the pay plan and merit increase, having spoken with Tim Swinney, former
council member and having her facts together. Mrs. Jarman read the following:
.
"Because silence is often construed to mean tacit approval of opinions expressed,
I voice my position at this time on the merit system.
1. With due respect to views expressed by Council, I believe that the merit
system is the cornerstone of a just and viable personnel system in a
democracy. Just because there is no 100% objective merit system does
not mean that the system should be thrown out in its entirety. Should
someone undeservedly get a step increase, it surely does not mean that
Council believes those who deserve recognition should be denied their just
dues.
2. Quota systems, where tried, have destroyed the very results they were
intended to achieve. The Air Force having tried it in OER's (Officer
Effectiveness Ratings) abandoned it after a few years, because it destroyed
the morale, caused ill will between individuals, above all because it divorced
the rating system from performance. I am totally against such a quota
system.
3. This budget we are reviewing is, I understand, predicated and built on the
reinstatement of the merit system. Therefore, as recommended in the
Public Sector Personnel Consultant report, Executive Summary B.8 "the
City should administer the salary plan on a merit pay basis utilizing the
City's current performance appraisal system".
.
-277 -
4.
It is my understanding that prior to the adoption of the 1998-99 plan of no
merit increases for the fiscal year, the City employees were told why it was
necessary because in the long run, it would work out for the best. They
were not told that the step increase system would be abolished for good.
.
In voting approval of the total budget, Councilmembers Ken Greenwald, Joe
Potempa and I implicitly approved the Personnel Consultant's
recommendations in its entirety. The new members, Ginna Agee and Glyn
Williams are of course, exempt from that commitment.
5. If Council reneges on this commitment - and I realize this council is not
held to whatever commitments a previous council made - in good
conscience I cannot support such a decision. It is not my M.O. to treat
"paid help" shabbily while pampering constituents. Council has every right
to abolish or reinstate the merit system. My Japanese sense of honor
dictates, however, that I put my council tenure on the line. Should Council
abolish the merit system, I tender my resignation."
Respectfully submitted,
Pia Jarman
September 1, 1999
#2
Discuss architectural services agreement.
.
Mr. Sweatt noted the new emergency services buildings and the library are well
underway and reminded Council that included in the bond issue was a projected
amount for remodeling of the existing police facility to move the municipal building
activities into that area. Some preliminary work has been done and it is time to
move forward and we would like to enter into an architectural service agreement
with the same firm (burns f1etcher gill) in the lump sum amount of $20,000 for
architectural services.
Mayor Pro-Tern inquired regarding the "consultant's fee as a direct pass through
times a multiplier of 1.25, and out-of-pocket expenses will be reimbursed at actual
cost times a multiplier of 1.15".
Mr. Sweatt said that would be for additional services that are not anticipated above
the $20,000 amount. If Mr. Fletcher is called on to do a substantial amount of
other kinds of work, payment would be calculated. We don't foresee any
additional cost at this time. If by some strange event, in tearing out the jail, found
a major structural problem, that would be additional design work.
Mayor Pro-Tern Potempa asked Mr. Sweatt if, to his knowledge, was there any
asbestos in that extension of the building to which Mr. Sweatt replied, "no, not to
our knowledge". If we find there is some substantial requirement such as having
.
-278-
.
.
.
to call for added expense of asbestos removal, that would be covered under the
multiplier of 1.25.
At this time Mayor Baldwin arrived and took the chair to preside over the
remainder of the meeting.
Mr. Greenwald stated he assumed the city got bids on contractors to do the work.
Mr. Sweatt affirmed and stated that part of the architectural service will be to
prepare plans and specifications. Included in the work will also be an evaluation of
the air conditioning system as well as design of a new roof.
Mr. Greenwald stated he had no problem with any of that; however, staff would be
hard-pressed to talk him out of a penalty clause.
Mayor Baldwin inquired as to the status of the emergency services buildings
project which was to have been completed in March?
Mr. Sweatt reminded Council that by the time we awarded bids it delayed
progress. The contractor has turned in a workflow schedule that indicates
completion by October 15, 1999. December is more nearly the move in date
(before Christmas).
Mayor Baldwin stated he is total agreement with Mr. Greenwald in that we should
have included a penalty clause in a contract of that size to hold their feet to the
fire.
Mr. Sweatt advised the issue at the time was a payment for early completion which
we chose not to enter into that arrangement.
Mr. Potempa inquired if there is anyway we can hold the architect legally
responsible. In other words, is the contractor responsible to the architect?
Mr. Sweatt said in his opinion we couldn't. The contractor is responsible for
prosecuting the work correctly according to plans and specifications, but not as far
as time or that sort of thing. The contractor is working for us. The architect is
overseeing the project as to compliance with plans and specifications.
Mrs. Jarman inquired if the contractor has to answer to us as far as timing is
concerned.
Mr. Sweatt assured that yes, they do, in monthly "meetings. Mr. Sweatt said he
would like to see the contractor doing the work on the library bid the renovation
work on the municipal building.
-279-
With no further discussion this item will be placed on next Tuesday's agenda for .
action.
#3 Discuss an ordinance establishing a Municipal Court technology fund.
Mr. Sweatt noted there is a draft of an ordinance that the city attorney has
reviewed with the court personnel regarding establishment of a municipal court
technology fund as discussed earlier in the budget revenue proposal. This has
been authorized under provision of state law, funds to be specifically earmarked
for certain types of use. It is a means to produce revenue to use for municipal
court activity technology improvements and we recommend Council authorize the
adoption of the ordinance.
Mr. Williams asked how the city would differentiate between computer systems
and computer networks? Hardware is hardware - systems is just more than one
(1) piece of hardware.
Mr. Sweatt said some of it is the same terminology but computer systems may be
one (1) or two (2) items and a network may be the hubs and servers, etc. Wording
is copied from state law.
With no further discussion this item will be placed on Tuesday's agenda for action.
#4 Discuss Pro-Logis request for Tax Abatement.
.
Mr. Sweatt noted we have a representative of Pro-Logis here tonight. Mr. Brown
is here to assist us with answers to any questions. Pro-Logis is a real estate
investment trust that builds large, commercial buildings for lease. They propose to
build a 160,000 square foot building in Tri-County Business Park. They have
qualified for a 90% abatement over a period of eight (8) years and 80% in the ninth
(9th) year. As this matter went through the Economic Development Commission,
Pro-Logis discussed the matter and asked for a variation of that, instead to extend
the abatement for a period of 10 years. As we worked through and did the
comparison, the arrangement would allow 80% abatement over a period of 10
years (dollars would end up being the same). The Economic Development
Commission (EDC) has recommended approval of the 80% abatement and capital
improvements over a 10-year period. We think this is a major addition to the
community. Mark is distributing a copy of the overall site plan.
Mr. Brown pointed out that Pro-Logis is the same as (if you were involved several
years ago with our first building) previously known as Security Capital Industrial
Trust. Just to better acknowledge what we are doing today, being a global
company and the largest owner and developer of industrial real estate across the
country, we changed our name last July and Pro-Logis signifies "professional
logistics". The distribution business is more of a logistics business than it has
been in the past as a warehouse business. This project will be very similar as far
as looks to the existing facility as far as state-of-the-art construction. Pro-Logis is
.
-280-
.
a long-term owner of real estate; therefore, we only do things - spend the best
dollars and own topnotch quality specs so this project will be indicative of the
project already in the park. 96,000 square feet is already pre-leased to one of our
global customers who leases space from us in seven (7) other markets across the
United States (Graebel Movers). They will be consolidating the San Antonio and
Austin facilities. We will have an additional 64,000 square feet of what we call
inventory space - some people refer to it as spec space - we are already marking
that space to other global users in our network. We currently have about
172,000,000 square feet across the U.S. and Europe with about 4,000,000 square
feet in San Antonio which is 98% leased as of today. Our project, since
completion has stayed 100% leased.
Mr. Sweatt noted that one of the questions the EDC was interested in, and Eric
Brown has spoken to that - it is very important that the abatement be passed
through to the tenants and that is normally done through a triple net type of lease.
.
Mr. Brown said all their leases are triple net - we don't use the "t" word - it is a
bad word in our company, we use the term "customer(s)". As an example, there is
a new law that allows an owner to potentially get some school taxes back
equivalent to the amount of sales taxes it pays. It would be very easy for a
landlord not to pass that on to a customer. We recently have been able to take
some benefit on that and every cent goes back to our customers. We use it to
bring customers into our buildings. If the space isn't leased it doesn't do us any
good. One of the key reasons that the Park (Tri-County) has been so successful
in our project is the fact that the city of Schertz has had the foresight to allow
companies such as Pro-Logis to look at this type of avenue to bring customers in
to the Park. To show our commitment to the Park and the City, we did today, take
possession of another owner that had a piece of land under contract (a 12.8 acre
site adjacent to our facility) we have taken over that contract because the Dallas
developer was not going to be able to perform so we are looking to close on that
site later this year and that will increase our investment.
Mayor Baldwin asked how the new facility compares in size to the first facility.
Mr. Brown said the first building is 244,000 square feet, this is 160,000 square
feet.
Mayor Baldwin noted the new facility is in both Guadalupe and Comal County
which means school district taxes are going to be affected.
Mr. Brown said it splits the building right down the middle of the site. This has
happened in other areas and generally, they (school districts) will agree on the
total assessed value and based on architects or in-house calculations, will take
their pro rata share.
.
-281-
Mr. Sweatt noted a draft of the ordinance is included in the packet and we would .
recommend Council adopt the ordinance approving the tax abatement at next
Tuesday's regular meeting. Following Council action, the request will go to the
two (2) counties with a presentation to both counties.
#5 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
· Noted there is an unfunded mandate item from the TNRCC requiring the city to
send a 1998 drinking water quality report to each of our water customers
comparing our samples on certain categories to the standard. In all cases our
drinking water quality is much better than the threshold requirements; however,
this may cause some concerns. We will be mailing the report to each
residential water customer and the cost is anticipated to be approximately
$3,600 for printing and postage.
· Announced the bids for the overlay work have been received and Ford
Engineering has recommended awarding the project to low bidder, Ramming
Paving Company, Inc. in the amount of $30,850. We would like to place this
on your agenda for award next week.
· Reiterating the need for a contingency account, we have a dire emergency
having lost a pump at the Nacogdoches well site over the weekend. We are
barely able to keep up with weekend demand and would like to move forward
to purchase a new pump and have it installed by the weekend if at all possible.
We are looking at as much a $30,000. We will be taking proposals from
Odessa Pump and PMI, both have done work for us in the past.
.
#6 ITEMS BY COUNCIL
Mr. Williams:
Commented that he has been working with Kerry on a deal up at Woodland Oaks
and FM 3009 that seems to be working well.
Mr. Potempa:
· Inquired as to the junkyard on FM 78 where the building was demolished by
H.P. Printing - is that part of our demolition work and when is it going to be
cleaned up.
Mr. Sweatt informed Mr. Potempa that all that junk belongs to Burch Roofing and
all our demolition work has been completed.
· Reported the TIF meeting on Monday was very well attended. They reaffirmed
they are going to continue on with the project even though the school district .
bailed out. The TIF is looking at revision of the bylaws.
-282-
. Mayor Baldwin inquired as to the status of participation from the County and Mr.
Sweatt said it is our position that the District has not been dissolved and there is
no reason for the County to take any affirmative action to stay in; only if they
chose to pull out. We had a meeting with Judge Sagebiel and one of the
commissioners and there is some trepidation that some on the Commissioner's
Court may want to back out. The city attorney is preparing a letter for us to the
school and county attorneys.
Mrs. AQee:
· Inquired of Mr. Sweatt as to the cause of the (vehicle) rollover on FM 3009 to
which Mr. Sweatt replied, "a mobile phone". The lady reached in the back to
get the phone and took her eyes off the road.
Mrs. Jarman:
· Noted the Hometown Heroes project has been put to bed thanks to Dolores
who did all the typing. We got it signed and mailed. The cover letter was typed
on August 25th and mailed well in time for the deadline.
.
· The Citizens Police Academy is starting Thursday, October 7, an eight (8)
week course, cut back from 13 weeks when Joe (Potempa) and I went through
it. For those interested, application forms can be picked up at the Police
Department. It was a fun course. The classes are from 7:00 p.m. to 10:00 one
night a week.
Mr. Potempa interjected his recommendation that every councilmember attend on
of the sessions.
· Announced the Schertz Humane Society will be doing dog training beginning
Thursday, October ih at the Park.
· Noted the Library Board will not meet until the first Monday before Labor Day.
Mr. Sweatt noted the Library will be closing for the week of the 1 ih _ 23rd
(tentative schedule) for the contractor to do the carpeting and get everything
moved out and back in. If the dates change we will let you know.
Mr. Greenwald:
Reported some of the members and ex officios of the Schertz/Seguin Local
Government Corporation took a trip to the ranch which was very interesting. The
engineers got a tentative pipeline laid out. They are going to Austin next
Wednesday - the Texas Water Development Board has a program if your doing a
. major regional project and your line size comes' up to 30" -long range you're
-283-
looking at a 40" line they will give you the money to do the 40" line now, deferring .
the interest and principle for 10 years or some magic number. We could end up
getting use of State money for some of the project. At the meeting of the 16th they
are supposed to give us some tentative budget numbers.
#7 ITEMS BY MAYOR
· Commented he had a complaint from Bob Vallance about truck traffic in front of
his place on FM 1518. The truck traffic has become horrible - they hit the park
and start accelerating and by the time they go by his place they are doing 55 or
60 mph and he would like the police to be a little more vigilant over there and
slow them down. Mayor Baldwin said he noticed an awful lot of truck traffic
lately and wondered where they were coming from.
Mr. Sweatt reminded there is a lot of construction going on all over the city. With
the seal coat work in progress on FM 1518 the traffic should be slowed down now.
#8 BUDGET WORKSHOP
Mayor Baldwin asked if there is any issue we need to deal with in this budget that
anyone thinks is exorbitant or obscene, either revenues or expenditures? Is there
anything anyone would like to throw their elected position on the line for by going
out and having Kerry add to the budget so we can raise the tax rate?
.
Mr. Potempa commented he would like to see another vehicle in the Animal
Control Department.
Mr. Sweatt said there is none budgeted this year. Part of the county payment
includes a payment for vehicle equipment reserve that will eventually pay for
replacement.
Mr. Sweatt noted there is an item that is not included in the budget we need
to talk about. Having spoken on several occasions of the staff's recommendations
regarding the use or lack thereof, of a siren warning system, we continue to believe
that is not an effective warning system. A considerable amount of research has
been done on other types of warning systems, one of which is called Community
Watch or City Watch System. It is a software and hardware program that actually
uses automated voice response and telephone out-dialing. It would allow us to
identify and target a given area and the software will manually call every telephone
number in that given geographic area and leave a pre-recorded message
depending on the need at the time. That system has some down sides but we
think that philosophy is a better system. It is somewhere in the neighborhood of
$27,000 - $30,000 plus $25 per line implementation cost. We could fund that
through a change in our building inspection fees. We currently establish a building
permit fee based on a value of $40 per square foot. We could change that
upwards to $45 per square foot. The Southern Standard Building Code .
-284-
.
recommends between $45 and $50. If we raise that to $45 per square foot, based
on our current numbers (on residential alone in an average house of 2,100 square
feet), our revenue would increase by about $33,000 per year. You need to be
aware that kind of change would change the building permit fee on a 2,100 square
foot house including permit fee and plan check fee of $40 is $607.50. At $45 it
would change the cost to $673.50. That is one painless way to raise some
revenue to do something that we believe is much more efficient system and would
probably be used for other things. Those cities we have talked to with this system
are really sold on it. There are still some bugs we need to work out - part of it has
to do with time. We are looking at an average neighborhood of about 800
telephone numbers. It will take a period of time depending on the number of lines
we could dedicate to call 800 phone numbers. It operates on a phone port so each
four (4) ports, 250 phones can be contacted within an hour, so with 16 ports we
could message 1,000 phones in an hour. We've looked at the neighborhoods that
would probably need to be affected.
.
Mr. Williams asked if the system could be programmed to call certain numbers first
in an emergency and Mr. Sweatt said it has a pointer to draw the area of the
numbers to call. If we had it set up to call 500 in an hour we would designate the
most critical first. The fallacy is that it does not include unlisted phone numbers.
Some new numbers can be captured at the utility counter but probably not too
many. We can go back and buy an updated database periodically. It comes with a
base map showing the streets in place. In our case, we are growing so fast they
won't have all the streets but that doesn't make any difference because this system
operates on longitude and latitude.
Mayor Baldwin stated, in his opinion it does add one more thing to our repertoire of
things we've done to eliminate problems we had in the October 17 flood.
Mr. Sweatt said we have a little money coming from FEMA but not as much as we
found we really needed to set up the low water alarm system. We are
recommending the Community/City Watch System in lieu of a siren system.
Mayor Baldwin said he would be in favor of the system but he believes the siren
system needs to be moved down to the park where people can hear it when the
creek starts coming up.
Mr. Greenwald said his problem with that is when the siren goes off, what does it
indicate? The next thing is going to be; "we've got a chemical leak, why didn't you
blow the siren"?
Mr. Williams asked what it would involve moving the siren we have now down to
the park.
Mr. Sweatt said it would be $1,275 in upgrade and other costs would be
. approximately $22,000.
-285-
Mr. Williams asked why it won't work as it is down there. Mr. Sweatt said because
it is set off with an electromagnetic button and they are proposing it be operated
more dependably by a radio signal.
.
Mayor Baldwin recommended we go ahead and raise the building permit fee and
put a line item in the budget, then we'll talk about how we want to spend that
$30,000. We can always amend the budget.
Mr. Potempa said he guessed he wouldn't get the truck for the Animal Control
people.
Mayor Baldwin asked if there was any consensus for an additional truck for Animal
Control.
Mr. Sweatt said they certainly would like one but we determined we just couldn't
find any funding for it this year. There has been an expressed need for an
additional vehicle to run errands but we will likely meet that with a transfer of a
secondary vehicle out of public works.
Mayor Baldwin asked if anyone else had any discussion on the merit (pay)
situation and what we're going to do. It was his recommendation that the City
Council get everyone into the plan where they ought to be and if we can't afford to .
do it in one (1) year and we have to spread it out over a year or two, he would like
to see everyone get into the plan - department heads - everyone where they need
to be so that we can then start to do this plan the way we are supposed to. We
can then take a look at how we compare with other communities. He'd like to see
us take that merit money and use that to get everyone into the plan at least at the
minimum salary level in the pay plan.
Mr. Sweatt stated that would be pretty expensive and the only people who are not
in it are department heads and top administrators, some second level persons.
Mayor Baldwin stated there is a 4% salary increase in there for everyone and this
day and time a 4% salary increase is not a bad salary increase, it is more than a lot
of people are going to get.
Mr. Williams stated he agrees that something needs to be done to get this resolved
so we can move on.
Mr. Greenwald said he didn't think the 4% would be enough to get everyone at the
level where they need to be.
Mr. Sweatt explained that today, every city employee is in the pay plan somewhere
with the exception of a group of some of the department heads and some of the
second in command personnel. When we made up the budget, we made a
.
-286-
.
recommendation and the money is in there, that all positions essentially get a 4%
change (we went to 92 instead of 88), so where they were last year, they are going
to get 4%; however, that starting step moved away from them by 4%. We are
saying to prevent a big impact, we'll put another $700 in the pot to get a
department head or top administrator closer into the pay plan, no more than $700.
That will get a couple into the pay plan, it won't get them all. Also, there is
budgeted for them, along with every other employee, the eligibility for two (2) more
steps, another 4%. If they merited that, they would get that on top of whatever
their new salary is. The numbers I gave said there will still be 10 employees who
still have not got to the beginning step of the salary plan for their position.
Mayor Baldwin reiterated it is his recommendation to get those 10 people to the
minimum level with that $70,000 or whatever it takes, and then next year when
everyone is where they ought to be, then we start back with the adjustment based
on how our salaries compare with other cities our size and our merit system.
Mr. Sweatt said he couldn't speak for his department heads but he could tell you
that several of the department heads would rather see a merit increase kept. No
one is going to give up a good salary but there is going to be a morale factor if
they get $3,800 to $4,000 a year raise and an employee in the line gets 4% and
has no opportunity to get a merit.
.
Mr. Williams asked if the 10 people that aren't in the plan aren't concerned.
Mr. Sweatt said they know it but they also recognize the financial impact of getting
them into the plan is pretty severe. None are quitting - one (1) is retiring but not
because he didn't get in the pay plan.
Mrs. Jarman asked each of the council members what they consider is the most
important thing that city council can give. To her, it is service and we have to
compensate those who are giving that service. We ask our city employees to do
things that USAA doesn't ask their people to do, such as go out and stand by the
barricades when the water comes up. My point is that if you take away tools from
the supervisors, how are they to do their job?
Mayor Baldwin assured he did not want to take away any tools from the supervisor
if that 4% increase is a tool. There is not an employee in the city that is going to
leave employment of .the city because he doesn't get a merit increase this year.
How many left this year due to the restructure of the pay plan. They won't leave.
You don't have any problem with having 10 supervisors that are not getting what
they should in this pay plan. Is that fair?
Mrs. Jarman said if they accept that and if they feel that they would be put in an
awkward if they get some kind of a big raise and their employees do not even get a
step increase. How do they feel?
.
-287-
Mr. Sweatt stated the department heads use the evaluation system and the merit .
system as a carrot and stick - that's what is for - to reward good performance but
also to counsel with those who aren't giving good performance and it is an item the
department heads and supervisors use as a part of the process.
Mark Marquez (personnel officer) interjected that he is one of those department
heads that fall into that category and all things considered, he is looking at a 4%
increase like everyone is and the opportunity, presumably for a merit increase of
another 4% when his anniversary date comes up and he is willing to accept it even
though his salary is still not there, but he would rather see the rest of the
employees have the opportunity for a merit increase. There are a lot of folks who
really look forward to that. It is an opportunity for them to sit down with their boss
in an evaluation setting and get rewarded or not for what they have done. It is
really important, it makes a difference.
Mrs. Jarman asked if it is just the immediate supervisor who does the evaluation?
Mr. Marquez said it has to go up the chain and eventually Mr. Sweatt will sign off
on the evaluation, concurring or not concurring in some cases.
Mr. Potempa said, "You mean you sign off on everybody's performance report in
this city"? Mr. Sweatt explained that he evaluates all department heads and
reviews all employee's performance evaluations. Mr. Potempa said "So, if the
supervisor thinks the guy is great and doing an outstanding job and you don't, you .
can yank him down a notch." Mr. Sweatt said he could. Mr. Potempa felt that was
micromanaging and he didn't like that.
Mr. Sweatt said he wasn't micromanaging, you (council) hired him to manage. The
supervisor makes the call but if there is some reason to doubt that, he will certainly
talk to the supervisor and department head and go back and look at that
employee's performance.
Mayor Baldwin reiterated there are 10 people who may never get to the minimum
salary for their job and that isn't really fair either. Mayor Baldwin went on to say he
isn't defending supervisors, he has been at the forefront on this council trying to
get employee's salaries to where they ought to be and in his thinking, you do that
going from 86% to 92% after everyone is where they ought to be. He doesn't have
a problem with merit increases - without merit increases you don't need the
evaluation. People will get whatever the cost of living is regardless. We're talking
about money, we're talking about the cost of doing all that and his recommendation
is to throw that money, get everybody where they ought to be and then deal with
the pay plan. Without support from other members, Mayor Baldwin withdrew his
recommendation.
.
-288-
. #9 EXECUTIVE SESSION: Called under Chapter 551 Texas Government
Code, Sub-Section 551.072, deliberation regarding real property.
An Executive Session was held from 9:25 p.m. until 10:35 p.m.
#10 Action, if any, on the above Executive Session.
Mr. Greenwald moved to authorize the City Manager to pursue purchasing water
rights. Mrs. Jarman seconded the motion, which carried with the following votes:
AYES: Councilmembers Greenwald, Potempa, Jarman and Williams
NAYS: None
#11 ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to discuss, Mayor Baldwin adjourned the meeting
at 10:40 p.m.
.
ATTEST:
~ lJ./tvuu ~~
Deputy City Secretary, City of Schertz
.
-289-