Loading...
ccswks 04-10-1996 SPEC~AL MEETING OF THE CITY COUh~IL APRIL 10, 1996 The Schertz City Council convened in Special Workshop Session on Wednesday, April 10, 1996 at 7:00 p.m. in the Conference Room of the Municipal Complex, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas. The following members were present: Mayor Hal Baldwin, presiding; Councilmembers Charles McDonald; Joe Potempa; and Ken Greenwald. Staff present were City Manager Kerry Sweatt, Mark Marquez Economic Development Coordinator; and Deputy City Secretary Dolores Butler. U HEARING OF RESIDENTS Mr. Bill Neller said he paid his bill yesterday of $35.33 and asked the young lady at the counter why his sewage bill doubled this month and he was told he had a water leak; however, his water bill hadn't gone up so he didn't know how he could have a leak. Mayor Baldwin stated that the increase could be due to sewer averaging if it is in the December, January and February cycle. If Mr. Neller would ask the billing clerk to pull up the records, she could give him the three months and determine the average. Mr. Sweatt said he would be happy to deal with Mr. Neller's concern at his convenience. Mayor Baldwin said it is possible there could be a mistake but Mr. Neller needs to have it checked out. t2 PUBLIC HEARING: discuss public hearing on request from Laredo Greenshire to rezone 17.7592 acres of land from Neighborhood Services (NS) to Planned Unit Development (PUD) and discuss first reading of an ordinance regarding such rezoning. Mr. Sweatt said the 17.7 tract of land at the intersection of Woodland Oaks and FM 3009 is currently zoned Neighborhood Service (NS) and the owners would like to develop a residentially Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property starts at Woodland Oaks and goes down FM 3009 to the Methodist Church on the corner of Green Valley, 700 plus feet on FM 3009 and siting to the Schertz United Methodist Church to about 500 feet of frontage on Greenshire. Mr. McDonald asked if these developers are the same ones who rezoned the other side of Woodland Oaks and Mr. Sweatt said he didn't think they were. Mr. Greenwald said Japhet is the one building now. Mayor Baldwin asked if it was their plan to back houses up to the right of way of FM 3009. Mr. Sweatt said yes, and of course they will be required to meet the overlay requirement in addition to the other zoning setbacks and the typical requirement includes permanent fencing, recognition of backing to a major thoroughfare and circumstances such as that. -197- Mayor Baldwin asked if as a PUD were they giving any kind of breakdown on what they're wanting to do - number of houses versus businesses or whatever else they're wanting to do. Mr. Sweatt said they want to rezone so they can vary the lot size to accomodate trees. Mr. Potempa asked what Planning and Zoning said last night and Mr. Greenwald said they concurred. Mr. McDonald wanted to know what the minimum lot size would be and Mr. Greenwald said it was 6,000, probably larger than that. Mayor Baldwin mused that there won't be many size lots on 17 acres. Mr. Greenwald said per acre, depending on how they layout utilities. houses with those probably four (4) the ,streets and Mr. Willman said there is a large green area in there too. Mr. McDonald asked if the greenbelt stays at the bottom of the hill and Mr. Greenwald said it continues on and backs up to the existing developed properties. Mayor Baldwin said they haven't platted yet, they are just looking to zone. Is that right? Mr. Greenwald confirmed that was right. Mayor Baldwin said it is too early to talk about entrances, etc. and Mr. McDonald said they would probably be off Woodland Oaks Drive. Mayor Baldwin asked if they couldn't get an entrance off FM 3009. Mr. Sweatt said he didn't know what their plans are but they probably could considering the amount of frontage. Mr. Greenwald said he thinks their intent is to come off Woodland Oaks Drive. Mr. Sweatt asked Greenwald said residential. if they did not submit a they have a master plan plat and showing Mr. all Mayor Baldwin said the request is to discuss a public hearing so if we are going to have a public hearing Tuesday night, there will be someone there to answer questions. Mayor Baldwin noted that he will not be able to attend the meeting next week so Mr. Greenwald will be handling the meeting and alerted councilmembers present to ask some questions regarding the type of development they intend. Mr. Greenwald said Sam has no intention of putting anything except residential in there--i.e., single family residence. Mayor there want. Baldwin asked if they changed the zoning to PUD, be any way to stop any kind of development we Mr. Willman said yes, by platting. would don't -198- Mr. Sweatt said the master plan is kaput because of changes and Mr. Willman said not the new one. Mr. Sweatt said they haven't filed any sort of plat or master plan with this request. Mr. Willman said not with this request but they had a master plan prior to this, showing all of it. Mr. Greenwald said he would get with Steve and get a copy of the most current master plan. t3 Discuss development and assessment program for Live Oak Hills. Mr. Sweatt said we have a couple of guests tonight and city Attorney Spain is here to explain a concept grounded in long-time law in the State of Texas allowing cities to conduct a street assessment program for the purpose of assessing partial cost for improving streets and related matters to abutting property owners on the benefit principle. This one is slightly different and we have talked about it in general terms but is now time to discuss it in 'more specific terms. Mr. Ron Wood and partner, Del Johnson, are here tonight to assist us in discussing a proposal to the city Council that could culmunate in approval of a street assessment program in which property owners in Live Oak Hills Subdivision would be assessed a portion of the cost for improving the street and drainage facilities in front of their property. currently Mr. Woods owns over 50% of the lots in what is described as Phase I of the Live Oak Hills Subdivision development which basically exists as one tier of lots off Schertz Parkway to the last lots facing on King Lane off Wiederstein Road in Live Oak Hills. There is one tier of lots that face on Schertz Parkway on the west side. This proposed development would begin behind those lots facing on Schertz Parkway and go toward the city limits between King and Jupe and would end with those lots that face on King Lane (street and drainage improvements would consist of King Lane, Lyric, Mora and Nile) along Wiederstein Road. There are currently 170 lots in the area to be improved, and of those, there are eight (8) lots that will be affected by the drainage design, leaving 162 lots that will benefit abutting owners. Of the 162 lots, Ron Wood, Ltd. owns or controls 89. The City of Schertz has a total of five (5) lots in the area and all the other lots are owned by individuals and no individual owns more than four (4) lots. The engineer for the subdivider has conducted a preliminary design and investigated the drainage circumstances as well as preliminary design for water and sewer purposes and as a result, it appears the cost for improvements of the street and drainage work to be assessed to abutting property owners is $91.63 per front foot. The paving assessment program will allow property owners to be assessed on the benefit principle and they would be given an opportunity to pay that cost in full at the time of the completion of the work or a manner could be devised in which they would have an opportunity to pay that out over a period of approximately three (3) years; the idea being that Mr. Wood would improve all of the lots by virtue of improving the streets and drainage in that area. Individual owners, without the assessment program, would have -199- a very valuable lot created at no direct expense. Mr. Wood contacted us with a proposal and we believe this represents a good vehicle by which the Live Oak Hills Subdivision could be re-developed and would not be a manner in which the developer would be expected to pay more than his fair share of the cost of improving the area. The lots are divided in size, some being 70', some 75' in front footage; therefore you are looking at an assessment running from $6,500, $6,600 up. I believe with that, Mr. Wood can tell you of his plans and then Mike and I can discuss the process by which the improvements could be made. Mr. City ready Wood said he thought everything had will work with them and accomplish to proceed and get the development been covered. If the this thing, they are done. Mayor Baldwin asked if the property would be totally replatted and Mr. Wood said no. Because all the lots are not owned by Ron Wood, Ltd. they cannot replat. Mr. McDonald asked if the $91.63 included sewer. Mr. Sweatt said water and sewer can be and would normally be accomplished through our pro rata agreements, that doesn't require an assessment program though we enter into an agreement with the property owner who extends lines and as connections are made, we recover that cost over a five-year period. At the end of the five-year period, if all the lots haven't been connected, those lines become city property and we cease collecting pro rata and returning it to the developer. The answer is, yes, there will be water and sewer on top of this but it is not paid through the assessment program. Mr. McDonald wants to keep the streets? questioned what about the property owner that his lots. Is he going to get an assessment for Mr. Sweatt responded he would get an assessment and would have to payor a lien would be filed on the property. Water and sewer costs will be entered against the property but will not be due and collectible until there is a water and/or sewer connection made. At that time, collection would be made under the pro rata agreement and that collection would be rebated to the developer within the first five (5) years. That is based on engineering estimates of about $4,500. Streets and drainage, including engineering cost and contingency, are estimated at $1,191,000, and the water and sewer is $737,000 of which the developer will pay the full cost and hopes to recover those appropriate considerations - not a small project by any means. The average of the lots would be about $7,300 and water and sewer would be about $4,500. Mayor Baldwin asked if there would be a rezoning requirement since that is frontage and Mr. Sweatt said yes. Mr. Wood will be filing a request for rezoning and reminded the Council that the front portion of the property is zoned General -200- Business (GB), but it is not just those first lots that are included in this project, but that zoning extends a full 500' back from center line of Schertz Parkway so that GB zoning extends through the lots that front on Nile. Mr. McDonald said those lots are in the reinvestment zone too, aren't they. Mr. Potempa responded of course they are. Mr. Sweatt said that doesn't affect the developers. Mr. Sweatt said another issue Council needs to be aware of is that the lots that are left out of this project, a portion of those lying toward the city limits on the south, fall in the flood plain so they are excluded from this project. The developer intends to build and develop and has plans that if Phase I proceeds, to do Phase II across Schertz Parkway there are approximately 190 lots in that area. Mr. McDonald asked if the flood plain is why the,developer is not going to the city limits and Mr. Sweatt said that was correct. Mr. McDonald asked if it was just in Schertz now, not Selma. Mr. Wood responded they are working on Selma. Mr. Sweatt, so that we might cover the general steps, asked City Attorney Mike Spain to talk about the schedule. Mr. Spain said there are several steps the statute requires the Council to go through in doing this kind of assessment program. First would be the adoption of an ordinance in which you declare the necessity of doing an assessment program and your intention to levy assessments, at least at that point, an indeterminate amount then some steps that have to be taken immediately after that; then you would adopt an ordinance calling a public hearing. The notice of that public hearing has to be published three (3) times before the hearing occurs, the first of which has to be at least 21 days before the hearing, then it is also necessary for the City to mail a notice of the hearing to every property owner who is going to be assessed under the proposal which has to go out at least 14 days in advance of the public hearing. As it turns out, a number of the people who own these lots live outside of the city, some of them live in other cities and in other states. That notice has to go out and the hearing has to be conducted by the City Council and after that, the Council would actually adopt an ordinance levying the assessment. The notice that goes out to the property owners has to describe the project, the estimate of the assessment and that estimate can't be more than that estimate or the process has to be repeated. It is important to make sure the estimates are good. After the assessments are levied there is a period of a little over two (2) weeks during which persons can challenge the process and once that challenge period of 15 days has passed it can't be challenged. At that point, the City would go out for bids, take bids on the project. The developer would put up the funds to pay for the project. The City issues assessment certificates and those are issued to the contractor that is the successful bidder and those assessments certificates are collected upon as the way to reimburse the developer for that up-front funding. -201- Mr. McDonald said not by the contractor though, he assigns those back to the City. Mr. Spain said those assessments certificates would be assigned either to the City or to the developer and the City could enter into a collection agreement with the developer to collect those assessments that are not assessed against property owned by the developer. There is a procedure for collecting on those people who choose not to pay the assessment in one lump sum at the outset - what was discussed was a two-year payment after one-third of the payment was made immediately. Those assessment certificates earn interest rates the greater of 8% for the interest rate on the City's last issue of general obligation bonds. In answer to Mayor Baldwin's inquiry as to what happens if someone just doesn't pay at all, Mr. Spain said there is a lien against the property and the assessment certificate gives the assessment certificate owner the right to foreclose on the property but no decision has been made as to whether the assessment certificate would be assigned by the contractor to the City or to the developer. If it is assigned to the developer, the developer would certainly enter into a collection contract with the City so the assessment collection process can be a part of the property tax assessment process. Mr. McDonald asked what happens if they default on that. Would they have to enter into a repossession? Mr. Spain said that was correct. Mr. Sweatt interjected that the assessment is secondary to tax liens. Mr. Spain said the developers feel, whenever it becomes evident of what the lots will be worth after the paving is done (the City will have an independent appraisal to confirm this), the feeling at this this point is that the value of lots after the paving will far exceed the cost of the assessment. Mr. Sweatt involved in each. said, as a matter of interest, the current lots this discussion carry an appraised value of $1,750 Mr. McDonald noted the assessed value of the property will go up too, when all this is done. Mr. Sweatt said the City doesn't control the assessed value; however, he would think the Appraisal District would take that into consideration. The public hearing will provide testimony as to what these benefits are and it is absolutely imperative that the value of property be increased by at least as much if not more. Mr. Spain said one of the things talked about was the need for the City to have an independant evaluation. Mr. McDonald said with no offense toward Mr. Wood~ he thinks the best part is that the City will go out for the bids on the streets. Mr. Wood said this is the only way it would work and they were thrilled to put up the money and let the City do that. -202- Mr. Spain said we are working on the schedule for this there are a lot of steps in this process. The fastest things could begin to happen would be if an ordinance is on the agenda for next- week. He's not sure if that could happen and will be talking to Tom Anderlitch to see if that is a possibility. It may have to slip to the next meeting after that, but the idea is that if the Council is interested in pursuing this, we'll move along with as much speed as possible. Mayor Baldwin asked what happens to the lots the City owns. Mr. Sweatt said we own them just as other property owners and we'll owe the assessment amount. There is only one that actually will be improved in the area, some of the lots are down in the flood plain. Mayor Baldwin asked if the water runs down Wiederstein Road into that drainage area. Mr. Wood said right now the water comes under Schertz Parkway and proceeds on down to the flood plain: Mayor Baldwin asked if any water off Mr. Wood's development would run down into that drainage area and Mr Wood said they all do now. Mayor Baldwin asked if we have a situation of once we've developed all those and put roof tops and slabs, etc., we're going to create a little more water runoff in that area and cause some people down stream to have problems. Mr. Sweatt said the subdivider would be required in this case, just as he would in a piece of raw land, to prove up front that there is not a deleterious drainage circumstance, that the water course is not being changed and that, based on 100% of build-up, that the water is not being diverted. The water may, with a greater intensity, get to the same point, but his engineer will prove that it is not gaining more water than was originally in that drainage area. Anytime you build a roof and more asphalt the water gets down there quicker and some of the water that was soaking into the ground will run stronger. Mr. McDonald asked if the water eventually goes down the Cibolo Creek and Mr. Sweatt said it would go down to Dietz Creek. Mr. McDonald said his concern is that of Mayor Baldwin's, we sure need to look at how much we're putting across Schertz Parkway, we're going to be needing a bridge eventually. Mr. Sweatt said the real issue Council needs to be reminded of is that there are approximately 73 owners who will receive notice that they are about to be assessed somewhere in the neighborhood of $6,500 - $7,000 who are probably going to be very interested in discussing that matter at the public hearing. Mr. Wood has discussed that with them, there have been numerous meetings with property owners collectively and individually about the process but to be frank with you, this becomes real with a formal notice that this is about to happen and there is going to be some discussion; from now on things will start moving. -203- Mr. McDonald said we need to have the discussion, that is part of the process, to know what their feelings are. Mr. McDonald asked Mr. Wood what they express so far, why they don't want to sell their $1,700 lot. Mr. Johnson said he thought there were several issues; first with the $1,700 lot we're talking about pay for no value because they never got a building permit so there is no value today. Most of these people realize that if they held their lot for 20 or 30 years there is going to be a significant increase in the value and they'd like to keep it and we're not pressuring them to sell, we just want to recoup their fair share. Some real estate people who own some of those lots have just said there is no way they would sell for that very reason. We have not met with anyone who has taken the position that they don't ever what to see the property improved, some may but that hasn't been our problem, they just want to own it themselves and want to keep it. Mr. Wood said a lot of them, because they've had so much run at them over the last 30 years, don't believe anything is going to happen so they wouidn't do anything. By and large, if it does happen, many of them will make substantial gains because some of those people paid $500 for those lots back then and even if their taxes were $50 a year for 30 years, that's $1,500 and they've got $2,000 in the deal and so they're in for another $6,500 - $7,000 - don't know what those lots will bring on today's market, but they understand there is a benefit for them. Mr. Sweatt said only way it can can do anything desirable lots in whether it is Mr. Wood or XYZ, this is the ever be developed. No one individual owner about the problem. There are some very the area. Mr. McDonald calculating the $6,500 plus $4,600 to hook up to sewer and water so they will have $11,000 and $2,000 for the property and taxes, said if they can see where that property is going to be worth more than that, there shouldn't be a problem. Mr. Sweatt said we believe this is a worthwhile project, we've spent a considerable amount of staff time, Mr. Wood has invested money in this project and if it is ever going to work, it has to work like this. If the prices come in too high, and that's the next real big hill - we'll hold public hearings and file notices of intention to do all these things and property owners will be quite concerned or will hear these numbers. If we take the bids and instead of it being $91.63 per frontage foot, we're talking about $95.00 or some other number, all of sudden it not only isn't feasible for the individual owner but it quits being feasible for the developer. Mr. Potempa asked if a person decided to put a modular home in there, would that be allowed. Mr. Sweatt said if they could meet all the code requirements they could, barring deed restrictions. -204- Mayor going end to Baldwin said if this development takes place, this to be last straight street where you can see from the other. is one Mr. Sweatt said he and the city attorney will work on a schedule the earliest possible time is that an ordinance could appear on the next action agenda or as late a May 7. The public hearing may have to be on June 18th. t4 Discuss appointments to Canyon Regional Water Authority Soard of Directors and Board of Trustees and discuss resolutions regarding such appointments. Mr. Greenwald said he and Johnny went to the meeting Monday night and there was a lot of discussion on Article 3.01 which limits trustees to five (5) years. There wasn't a quorum to make any changes, they are going to try again next month to at least start the process. John was going to get with Mr. Sweatt and give us a reading on this.' Article 8.01 says bylaws may be amended by 50% vote of the trustees at a regular scheduled board meeting which means they can change it if they want to. One of the things discussed is that it is a weak term limit, you resign and miss one meeting and be reassigned and start the five years over again. Apparently it was put in the original enabling legislation by Senator Armbrister, Representative Kuempel and Senator Zaffirini. Armbrister's contention was that he was getting a lot of heat and complaints about municipal utility districts essentially ram rodding, not giving anybody any choice. Mayor Baldwin appointed to Schertz. stated the Council trusts the judgement of those work out the problem in the best interest of Mr. Sweatt said it was John's recommendation that Ken and Sam Willoughby serve this year on the Board of Directors and Eber Busch serve on the Board of Trustees and then next year, Ken sit out a term and Johnny and Sam serve on the Board of Trustees. t4 Discuss ordinance regarding tax abatement and tax abatement agreement for and with D.S.I. Mr. Sweatt stated we were fortunate to have as a guest a representative of a new business in our community, Mr. John Sheridan who owns D.S.I. Distributing. We welcome the new business and Mr. Sheridan will discuss with you a tax abatement request that has come through the Economic Development Commission. Mark Marquez is here to briefly run through the abatement request and then ask Mr. Sheridan to answer any questions you might have. Mark Marquez said D.S.I. is primarily a wholesale consumer electronics distributor whose primary markets are RCA, Digital Satellite Systems, Toshiba and other consumer products and JBC and Bose Sound Systems. They are also the warehouse distributor for Warren Industries who make wenches for -205- off-road vehicles. D.S.I. plans a 20,000 square foot tilt wall building including office space in Tri-county Business Park at an estimated cost of $650,000. Equipment and tools appraised as personal property for tax purposes is estimated at $514,580. The basic request abatement is $650,000 in capital improvements to the property in Schertz; job creation in Schertz will have a payroll value of about $475,000; and the company expects to bring approximately 10 employees with them. The proposed site is a 2.314 acre tract on Corridor Parkway in the Tri-County Business Industrial Park - current value of the property is estimated at $29,231 (Guadalupe County). The abatement percentages authorized by the ordinance and guidelines and criteria are: capital improvements the first $75,000 at 10%, the remaining $575,000 at 1% for each 50,000 which equates to 11.5%. The payroll which is a soft number is estimated at $475,000 and 1% per $25,000 of payroll equates to 19% and there is a sales tax component which Mr. Sheridan can expand on but that works out to 2.4% on $1,180 actual revenues to the City. The total percentage authorized by our ordinance is 42.9%. The Commission has recommended a six (6) year abatement package at 42.9% beginning January 1, 1997. The Commission also recommends an acceleration of that percentage and there is a value that accelerates to three years instead of six and allows 90% for the first two years and 80% for the third year. The Commission has agreed to that as has Mr. Sheridan. To review the dollar value of the project - land value is estimated at $29,231; improvements are $650,000; personal property is $514,580 for a grand total of $1,193,811 in proposed new value as opposed to $29,231 in current value (land only). In terms of tax revenue, current land value would generate $119.03 every year and that will continue in the proposal, the improvements will generate $2,646.80; personal property will generate $2,095.37 for a total of $4,861.20 as opposed to $119.03 currently. Those are hard tax dollars based on our current tax rate of 0.4072. Additional revenues that can be expected by the city are based on a multiplier of 1% applied to the payroll; of the $475,000 of employee payroll we expect 1% to fallout in the city in the forms of sales tax and several other things they will be doing in the city. There is also a sales tax revenue of $1,180.65 totalling $10,791.85 as opposed to $119.03 which we currently receive. The abatement value, at 42.9% equates to an abatement of $1,135.40, the net value minus our current value is $9,656.37 - a gain to the city, after the abatement, of $9,656.37 on an annual basis. Over a six-year period (our normal abatement package), total revenues to the city would be $64,751.09 minus the cost of the abatement at $6,812.86, minus further, the cost of current revenues to the city of $714.17. The total net revenues to the city over the six-year period would be $57,224.06. In terms of a ratio, the total net value over the cost of the tax abatement is 8.4% to 1%. Cost per job works out to $681.29. When the state allows dollars per job they start out at $25,000 per job in terms of a grant. The effect of the acceleration from six-year to three-year abatement is a difference of about $60.00. -206- Mr. Sweatt reminded Council that this area is in the Enterprise Zone so the action recommended for the Council is the adoption of an ordinance that authorizes the execution of a tax abatement agreement between D.S.I. and the City of Schertz, no public hearing is necessary. Mayor Baldwin thanked Mr. Sheridan for developing community and attending the meeting and asked if he comments. Mr. Sheridan said two of his sons work business and one has bought and one is buying a home the community. in had in here our any the in Mr. McDonald stated, discounting the 1% multiplier which may or may not show up in city coffers, we're getting $11,000 in three years for a $6,000 give-away, there's our 1%. Mr. McDonald also asked, if D.S.I. is a wholesale distributor, where does the sales tax generate. Mr. Sheridan,replied they probably have some customers of their wench that have paid taxes. If they don't have a job or quote in a certain area, they sell and charge tax, but D.S.I. is strictly wholesale. You wouldn't come in the business and buy direct. Mr. Sweatt said he had asked Mr Sheridan generally what his area was or where his competitors were and his comment was that he really didn't have any competitors. There are other avenues that sell RCA, but they specifically deal to the TVRO side as well as certain consumer electronics and they do have an exclusive on that. The NRTC in Guadalupe Valley handles some of the same hardware but they have their area they sell to for their trade base. Mayor Baldwin said the Council will take the first action at the Tuesday meeting with the final reading the first meeting in May. t6 Discuss planning and communities. zoning process for gated Mayor Baldwin said, with two people absent, he would suggest holding off discussion on this item until the next workshop. t7 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: A. Reminder of the GVEC Firemen's Appreciation Barbecue on Thursday, May 2 - need to RSVP by April 22. B. Encouraged attendance at the Intsel Southwest ribbon cutting, grand opening, etc. on Saturday, April 27 from 1:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. C. Next week we will have the dedication of the Conference Room to Bob AndrewS. t8 ITEMS BY COUNCIL: Mr. McDonald: A. Announced that Easter Sunday he again became a great-grandfather - now has a great-grandson and a great-granddaughter. Mr. Potemoa: A. Asked what the occupational permit is there on FM 78 where The Station used to be. Where the tire repair is now, what's going on there? -207- Mr. Sweatt said the City Inspector has been involved in it because of some damage from an internal fire and that sort of thing and he will find out. B. As discussed with Mr. Sweatt today; Channel 5 news night reported about the cheapest town (Cibolo) on IH-35. t9 ITEMS BY MAYOR: A. Mentioned an article in paper regarding Retama - they got their decision they looking for with the racing commission and their million one-half bucks - guess they are going to open in June so have a season after all which is good news for the area. last the were and will B. Tommorrow is the Northeast Partnership luncheon meeting, if anyone would like to go. There are two or three things on the agenda, not a really exciting meeting but we did invite Retama to come talk to us about community support with the racing commission. Someone is supposed to be there from the Alamo Community College District to talk about wanting to locate some classroom space in the Northeast Partnership area. The meeting is at 11:30 a.m. in Live Oak at the Community Center. C. Mentioned the guy that won the five (5) numbers Lotto last night for approximately $60,000 at Supermarket and that Wuest gets 1% of that. on the Wuest's no by Mr. adjourned ADJOURNMENT: On a motion by Mr. otempa, seconded McDonald and unanimously approved the meeting was at 8,30 p.m. a.~ Mayor, City OI Schertz, Texas ATTEST: J:j&J~4/l~/) Deputy City Secretary, City of Schertz -208-