Loading...
ccswks 03-10-1993 106 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL MARCH 10, 1993 The Schertz City Council convened in Special Workshop Session on Wednesday, March 10, 1993 at 7:00pm in the Conference Room of the Municipal Complex, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas. The following members were present: Mayor Earl W. Sawyer, presidingj Joe Potempaj Barbara Stanhopej Mary Marsh and Ken Greenwald. Staff present were City Manager Kerry Sweatt; Deputy City Secretary Norma Althousej Administrative Assistant Mark Marquez; Police Chief Norman Agee and Water/Wastewater Superintendent John Bierschwale. #1 HEARING OF RESIDENTS: Mr. Bill Neller advised there was an error in the Newsletter. The flags will not be flown on March 27th but rather on March 29th - the day the last American troops left Vietnam. #2 Discussion of public hearing on proposal to create a Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone along Schertz Parkway. Mr. Sweatt commented he thought they would give the Council a partial delivery of what will be unveiled at the public hearing on March 16th. Mr. Marquez gave a brief presentation to the Council on the TIF Plan, exhibiting a chart on the overhead for them to see. Mr. Marquez stated no new additional taxes are required to support this program. It is driven by increases in property values over time. This time line runs out in 36 years, these are 3 year increments. You are looking at the presumption of what happens if property values increase 1% per year over the next 36 years. Mr. Marquez stressed there are three key points in the plan. The first key point is the captured value which is the difference between the base value and where the actual value of the property happens to be. Funds from the TIF only come from this area and nowhere else. Base year value stays constant. The second key point is that this plan is not driven by tax rate, but strictly by property values. When values are below the line, the TIF fund gets no money. The third key point is that this is a long-term program. will take a period of time for funds to accrue into account where it will be worthwhile. It that Mr. Potempa asked if Increment Reinvestment that is correct. this plan applies only to Zone and was informed by Mr. the Tax Marquez Mr. Sweatt remarked that if there was ever a case of something for nothing, this plan is it. You will getting lose no l,-)'j revenue, and it is fueled by growth unless taxes are lowered and property values drop at the same time. Mr. Sweatt further stated presentations had been made to the Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent District and to the County Commissioners Court and both approved participation in the plan. Continuing on, Mr. Sweatt said 209 notices have been sent to property owners within 1,000 feet of the zone, notifying them of the public hearing on March 16th. The City has heard back from only one representative and that was a person involved in the extension of Schertz Parkway. Since there has been no ground swell of opposition, everything looks favorable. A draft of the agreement has been prepared. Mr. Sweatt suggested that Council hold the public hearing and take testimony and take no action at that time, but rather evaluate things and then corne back at a future meeting with a proposed ordinance and an agreement. If it's not approved, then obviously it will be withdrawn. Mr. Sweatt advised the legislature authorizes creation of this Reinvestment Zone and suggests that the Board that will run the program be a minimum of five persons. Because there are three jurisdictions involved, the City is recommending a Board of seven persons comprised of three representatives from the City (including a Chairman), two from the school district and two from the County Commissioners Court. Mrs. Marsh asked if the Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone will have a designated fund for revenues collected and Mr. Sweatt answered yes it will be a special and segregated fund that may only be expended for purposes the Board establishes. Any extra funds, after the project is finished, will be reimbursed to the participating entities. The City has contacted the Guadalupe County Appraisal District to see exactly how this should be set up. Mr. Marquez indicated the Board of Directors, once established, will begin to work on the final plan and then will come to City Council for approval of the final plan by ordinance. They should be finished prior to the effective date of the Reinvestment Zone. #3 Discussion of draft of contract regarding Tax Increment Financing. and agreement Mr. Sweatt said basically they have told the Council know. If anyone has questions about the makeup of the Directors or how it will be established, he and Mr. will try to answer their questions. all they Board of Marquez 108 Mayor Sawyer related that after the plan is passed, still be amended. it can Mr. Sweatt stressed that the ordinance itself creating the plan could certainly be either enlarged or diminished. If it were to be eliminated, it would take a 3/4 vote of the Board of Directors or no activity having taken place for a period of five years. Mr. on it. Marquez informed Mr. Sweatt they didn't put a time limit The law reads three years. Mrs. Marsh asked if it has to be three years and Mr. answered they are looking to get around that establishing a specific time limit. Marquez by not Mrs. Marsh felt two representatives from each entity is too many and recommended, if they're going to make the Board larger, then it should be three from the City and one each from the school district and County Commissioners Court. Mr. Sweatt pointed out the school district is the largest tax entity and he feels they will want two people on the Board. Mrs. Marsh expressed a desire to see knowledgeable citizens on the Board rather than people associated with any of the entities. There was a brief discussion on this with Mr. Sweatt saying the Board will consist of whoever the entities appoint, it doesn't necessarily have to be elected officials. Mrs. Marsh commented she would like a designated time once a year for a formal report from the Board to City Council and Mr. Marquez said it is a requirement. It can be included in the ordinance to solidify it if necessary. #4 Discussion of action regarding finance arrangement for portion of police fleet purchase. Mr. Sweatt reminded the Council that at budget time last year they discussed financing a portion of the replacement vehicles for the Police Department. Five vehicles are being replaced and the City is proposing to finance $35,963 for a 12 month period through a City depository agreement with Schertz Bank and Trust. We are asking Council to consider authorizing it at the next regular meeting. All the vehicles are in and the equipment is being installed. Chief Norman Agee stated he thought one of the vehicles be on the street today, but it didn't work out. would Mr. Potempa inquired if they ever figured anything out the cages, since the new vehicles are smaller, and Chief reported there is an adapter kit available for cages if decide to do that. about Agee they #5 Discussion regarding progress of cable television re-franchising with Paragon Cable Company. Mr. Sweatt commented that T.J. Connolly and Susan Williams from Paragon Cable are here tonight and then commended the Paragon company for its long and arduous effort in this re-franchising process. The City Managers and Attorneys for the cities of Converse, Live Oak, Kirby, Selma and Schertz met with T.J. Connolly and Susan Williams for about two months at least once a week and discussed every element of the existing and proposed new franchise and for the first time since Paragon has been the provider, they have accomplished give and take communications that have been productive for all. The current franchise is set to expire in September, 1993. It was a 15-year franchise issued in September, 1978 and two owners ago. When all the discussion and confusion arose from the new Cable Act, not many of us knew exactly where the future of cable regulation was going. Mr. Sweatt pointed out the City is not in the rate regulation business, but rather in the service regulation business. Mr. Sweatt related, that as he understands the Cable Act regulations today, because of a lack of effective competition, some areas are subject to higher rates than others. Schertz is considered involved in effective competition. Our area of competition will be in areas other than rates. Mr. Sweatt listed some highlights agreement: of the new proposed (1) it is a 15-year franchise beginning November 9, 1992 (this will tie our franchise with those of Converse, Live Oak, Kirby, Selma, Universal City, Cibolo and several other cities so we will take advantage of a larger bargaining unit since they all are up at the same time); (2) it provides added provisions calling for equal treatment if one city finds a better agreement; (3) it provides for a 5% franchise payment for all dollars attributable to the cable system; (4) it provides for a 5th, 9th and 13th year performance evaluation; (5) it provides for a quarterly report and discussion of new technology and new additions to the systemi (6) it provides for updated customer standards; (7) it provides a broad manner in which each of the cities will benefit from all new technology as the industry changes; ~ ~ (J 11 (8) it provides the City will receive at no cost certain service connections as they become available; (9) it provides that an emergency notification override will be placed in effect no later than December 31, 1995; (10) it provides that fiber optics will be installed in all jurisdictions no later than December 31, 1997; and, ( 11) there treatment entities. is a commitment in the franchise that the provision will be in effect for all of the equal various Mr. T.J. Connolly commented they had spent the last two months meeting with the various cities' City Managers and Attorneys and he thought quite a bit was accomplished. Paragon came to the table with a lot to prove. Mr. Connolly reported two key changes: (1) The 5% franchise payment is all revenue derived from or attributed to the cable system. Mr. Connolly said they realize basic rates have to increasing or be scaled back to get into homes and then create ancillary services and offer them. stop they The first phase of Cable Act 1992 is supposed to go into effect April 1st. The new FCC Chairman is going to request and be granted a 90-day stay and when the 90 days is up, will either request another stay or enact some of the rUlings and let others drop for a while. The FCC is currently in a state of turmoil and political struggle due to the election of a new President. Mr. Connolly further stated the important thing is there is a Section 17 in your document which says for the life of this contract, if the Federal government ever enacts the 1992 Cable Act or creates a 1997 Act, those Federal regulations will automatically, without negotiation, be rolled into your document. You probably will see stronger regulations from the Congress. Mr. Connolly noted that Congress and everyone in this room, except him, views cable as a utility and thinks it should be regulated and prices controlled. (2) Section 21, the equal treatment agreement, ensures that no matter what happens, the cities our there in 1995 or 1997, or in 2003 will enjoy all the franchise benefits, cable service changes, etc. An example of this is that Schertz, even though compared to San Antonio they may represent less than 1% of the cable business in the area, will enjoy the same franchise 1 -, "1 ~L J J benefits as San Antonio. Mr. Potempa was informed it now only advertising. asked the rate of the current franchise fee and by Mr. Sweatt it is 5%, but somewhat limited as applies to the cable TV portion and certain Mr. Potempa then wanted to know how much of the tax money comes back to the City and was informed that portion of the sales tax attributable to Schertz comes back to Schertz. Mr. Potempa then asked T.J. Connolly if they offer senior citizen discounts and was told yes. at age 65 and over you can get a 10% discount. Another question asked by Mr. Potempa is why the cable bill is paid 30 days ahead. T.J. Connolly replied the cable company pays for their service in advance and so they require it of the customer. There is no way to measure the service. However, when you request a disconnect, anything unused is refunded. It is easier to get the money up ahead and then refund. Mrs. Marsh wondered why T.J. Connolly doesn't consider cable a utility. Mr. Connolly replied because cable is needed for a clear TV picture. Mr. Greenwald inquired if there's any thought of getting service to Schirmerville. Mr. Sweatt informed Mr. Greenwald that currently they need 30 accounts per mile, they are looking at changing that to 25 accounts per mile and as far as Schirmerville, the company is going to take a look. A pro-rata arrangement has been discussed. Mr. Greenwald remarked the City is totally committen to enforcing the AICUZ regulations and by doing so have deprived the people in Schirmerville from getting cable service. T.J. Connolly mentioned the citizens do have an alternative now - a wireless cable operator is up and running and has taken a few of Paragon's customers. Paragon, itself, is considering the possibility of providing service to smaller clusters of homes. Mayor Sawyer thanked T.J. Connolly and Susan Williams for their time. Mr. Sweatt suggested they schedule discussion of the franchise agreement for the March 31st workshop, schedule a public hearing for April 6th for consideration of the ordinance on the first reading, and then possibly on May 18th further action on the second reading. 112 #6 Discussion of agreement for participation in the Alamo Area Narcotics Task Force Mayor Sawyer related several cities had dropped participation and asked which ones they were. Mr. answered Hollywood Park had dropped out and Chief Agee Leon Valley had also dropped out. out of Sweatt added Mrs. Marsh asked what the policy of the Alamo Area Narcotics Task Force is. Mr. Sweatt brought out several points about the task force: (1) it was created 7 years ago; (2) DEA is the big have the money to do force was established; player - most cities and counties don't interqjction effectively, so the task (3) most the cost portion assetsj cities were not on a basis of funding all or part of from State or Federal grants, but rather from a of local funds made up of forfeitured funds/seized it is a self-perpetuating operation; (4) the City added a position to its manning documenti the position is funded by the task force and is done on a rotating basis so it's not the same person all the time; (5) the officers receive good training; and, (6) Schertz has been asked to participate again; we think the funding will continue, but have been ask to obligate $14,884.75 in City funds, if necessary, to pay the cost of this operation; Mrs. Marsh asked what prompted the requirement for obligation of funds. Have they been stuck in the past? Mr. Sweatt answered he doesn't think so, but they want to be assured they can come up with local money if things don't work out. Mrs. Marsh then inquired where the headquarters are and was told by Chief Agee they are at Crownpoint in San Antonio. Mr. Sweatt expressed the opinion the City doesn't see it as a great liability as long as there are seized assets. Mrs. Marsh questioned who's in charge of accountability and Chief Agee answered the Comal County Auditor's Office which has worked out well. Mrs. Marsh wondered if the City gets any money and was told the task force pays our officer's salary. -I-'~ Mrs. Stanhope asked what the benefits are and Chief Agee listed three: (1) the Police Department gains a lot of criminal intelligence information: (2) it provides another source of manpower: and, (3) the assets will be divided if the task force dissolves. Mrs. Stanhope commented it sounds like, even if we have to pay for it, we're getting our money's worth. Mr. Potempa wanted to know if there's any liability and Mr. Sweatt replied the same liability as with any other police officer. Chief Agee pointed out there is a lawyer on the staff of the task force and they haven't had any litigation against them. Mr. Potempa then asked if Mr. Sweatt or Chief Agee had any reservations. Mr. Sweatt replied the only reservation he has is that perhaps in the future we might need an officer working closer to Schertz, especially if we see misapplied supervision. However, it may be that the DEA gives us better benefits. Mr. Potempa queried if Schertz can pullout of the task force short of a full year and Mr. Sweatt replied yes, but in that case they would have to bear the expense of the officer's salary. Mr. Greenwald observed that he thinks they're doing a great job. #7 Discussion of participation in Edwards Underground Water District Water Conservation Rebate Program Charles Aherns of the Edwards Underground Water District was at the meeting. Mr. Sweatt explained this participation involves an intergovermental contract between the City of Schertz and .the Edwards Underground Water District for incentive to citizens to replace current fixtures with low-flush units, from 3.5 gallons per flush down to 1.6 gallons per flush, and to pay them a $50 rebate to do it. Mr. Aherns informed the Council the agreement he brought for them to review is a draft agreement. The Edwards District will also provide an informational brochure and will fund the price of the printing and mailing of the brochures. What the Edwards District will be doing is adjusting the payback based on the City's water rates. The District would be funding $4500 to cover 90 rebates between now and September 30th of this year. 1 ~ 1 -L 1"+ Mr. Aherns further stated there are currently three other such programs in place - Leon Valley, Windcrest and Universal City. This is a good step for the City and something which shows the Federal government what they are doing to help conserve water. Mr. Potempa asked if a permit is required and Mr. Sweatt answered yes. If a plumber installs the new fixture, then the plumber will be responsible for getting a permit and will be charged a fee, but if the citizen installs the new fixture himself, then he will be responsible for getting a permit, but there will be no Charge. Mr. Aherns thanked the Water Department for their cooperation in the leak detection program. Mr. Potempa asked if they had found many leaks and John Bierschwale reported they found several fire hydrant leaks and they had been averaging finding 5-6 customer leaks per week. Mr. Aherns told the Council the Edwards District is in the process of developing a little door hanger to let customers know about leaks. It doesn't say you have a leak, it says there's a sound emitting from your house that might be a leak. Mr. Sweatt advised that if everything is in place, the Council could approve this rebate program at their next meeting effective April 1st. Mr. Aherns felt the Edward's District could meet the April 1st date. Mr. Sweatt reminded the Council that several months ago they enacted an amendment to their Code providing for these type of fixture replacements (low-flush toilets and showerheads). #8 CITY MANAGER'S REPORT: A. Commented Annie Almond from the Schertz Business Association is here tonight because the Business Association and the City are considering parade participation in other communities as well as those in which we have traditionally participated. This year they discussed the possibility of partiCipation in one or more of the San Antonio parades. Mr. Sweatt continued on saYing the Battle of Flowers parade is beyond our means, but we may be able to partiCipate in the Flambeau night time parade if we can meet several of their requirements. First of all, the Flambeau requires full illumination, which can be accomplished with the use of an on-board generator, and secondly, the towing vehicle has to be concealed. - ~ They have investigated several different ways to conceal the towing vehicle. You can buy a housing for approximately $600. The Street Department and the Business Association have looked at yellow and blue rope and a cover and several other devices that would camouflage it. That seems to be the most economical at approximately $375-$400. Mr. Sweatt commented that under Flambeau rules, the entry fee for the City is $12 and the entry fee for the Schertz Business Association is $250, so the Business Association will probably opt not to participate. It's likely we will have to spend upwards of $400 for the City to be represented, but we will get lots of exposure. We didn't budget for it, but in the past the Business Association has made some contributions toward the float. Mayor Sawyer asked if we don't have that money in City Council funds and Mr. Sweatt replied we have some in unallocated funds in the special events area and contingency funds. Mayor Sawyer asked the Council what they think of the idea and then noted that Art Youngworth is in charge of the Flambeau night time parade and he is being helped by Ty Brisgill. Ms. Almond described the few changes that will have to be made to the float and the Council gave their approval for participation in the Flambeau parade. Ms. Almond added that we can use the City logo on the float and reported the entry form is in right now and Schertz is listed as a participant. B. The City Department. Rowcliffe. has filled the two vacancies in the Police The two officers hired are Jeffrey Leal and Kevin C. Noted the basketball equipment at the large pavilion of the City park has been repaired and installed. He has asked Jerry Graham to distribute copies of the Newsletter with the article in it regarding the park. D. Informed Council TML Region 7 is meeting on March 26th in Eagle Pass and the Texas Water Commission is making a presentation on solid waste regulations. #9 Jubilee out and the Club indicated ITEMS BY COUNCIL: Mrs. Marsh reported the 4th of July committee had a meeting and you will start seeing cans around the area for donations. They will still have 100 for those who donate $100 or more. Mayor Sawyer he will take odo Riedel's place in donating $100. Mr. Potempa stated the Bluebonnet Palace advertising Lilly Marie's Restaurant and Selma take it down. Mr. John wants to get a permit Schertz to put the sign up on his property showing the restaurant to be across the road. put up a sign has told them to from the City of with an arrow Also, Mr. John : 1 G is considering establishing a catering service where the welding shop is right now. Mr. Sweatt advised that Mr. John needs to get a copy of the City's Sign Ordinance. Mrs. Marsh mentioned that Mr. John needs to put in a request with the Planning and Zoning Commission. Mr. Potempa said Mr. John also indicated to him that he is considering locating a hotel in the City of Schertz. Mayor Sawyer suggested Mr. Sweatt talk to the City Inspector, Leonard Truitt, and have him contact Mr. John. Mr. John will have to comply with the City's regulations. Mr. Potempa notified the Council he is asking permission to be absent for the next four weeks because he has been transferred to the night shift at the Commissary to supervise the new construction project. #10 ITEMS BY MAYOR: There were none. #11 ADJOURNMENT: Mayor Sawyer adjourned the meeting at 8:35 P.M. ~Cl/'-"? /)/1/ 1~" ~ ~~r, City of schertty Texas ATTEST: '-71 . ~ ~~~~ /_~------ .--.!.------------- ~--_._-=-~_.__.- - -- Deputy City ecretary, City of Schertz