Loading...
02-22-2000 . . . . . PLANNING & ZONING MINUTES February 22, 2000 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public Hearing on Tuesday February 22, 2000, at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas. Those present were as follows: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CITY STAFF Ernie Evans, Chairman David Richmond, Vice-Chairman Tony Moreno Gary Wallace Joyce Briscoe Keith Van Dine, Secretary Ken Greenwald, ex-officio Steve Simonson, Asst. City Manager/ Planning Coordinator Mary Ybarra, Planning! Recording Secretary Commissioners Absent Others Present Herb Rehmann, Glenn Mueller, SCUCISD Mark Jackson, 2706 Oak Leigh Elroy Menchaca 1 011 Meredith Dennis R Rion 555 E. Ramsey #1 Call to Order: Danny Tackett, 373 Elm Valley Dr. Keith Millers Kaufman & Broad Don Vaughan 2608 Starlight Ln. Betsey Sheerin, Janice Knippa, 1004 Robert Derrick Chairman Evans called the public hearing of February 22, 2000 to order. 1 . . . #2 Public Hearing: To receive citizen input on proposed street name changes to Woodbridge Subdivision Unit 1 & 2, Schertz Parkway. At this time, Chairman Evans stated that the purpose of the public hearing is to take all comments into consideration in making a recommendation to the City of Schertz City Council. On behalf of the Commission he thanked the citizens for their concerned interest and co-operation with the hearing procedures. In order to hear as many different comments as possible, we request that you do not repeat the same comments by a previous citizen. After the hearing is closed on this issue, no more comments will be received from the citizens. The public-hearing items will be placed on the City Council's agenda and a date and time for these hearings will be published. Chairman Evans at this time opened the floor for anyone wishing to address the Commission. . Danny Tackett representing Highland Homes builder for the subdivision stated that the company endorsed the name change at this time. With no other comments voiced, Chairman Evans closed the public hearing. #3 Adjournment of Public Hearing: The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission will convene in regular session, after the Public Hearing. The agenda is as follows: #4 Call to Order: Chairman Evans called the regular session meeting of February 22, 2000 to order. . 2 . . . . . #5 Approval of Minutes: 2000. Regular Session of January 25, 2000 and February 8, Chairman Evans asked for corrections or additions to the minutes of January 25, 2000? At this time, Joyce Briscoe stated that on page eight under her comment; "Joyce asked if there had been good turn outs, etc.", add "a" and strike out the "s". To read; "Joyce asked ifthere had been a good turn out". With no further corrections or additions, a motion was made by David Richmond and seconded by Gary Wallace to approve the minutes as corrected. With a vote being called the vote was as follows: Ayes: Gary Wallace, David Richmond, Tony Moreno, and Joyce Briscoe. Abstention: Ernie Evans and Keith Van Dine (absent at said meeting). Motion carried. At this time, Ernie Evans asked for corrections or additions to the minutes of February 8, 2000? With none voiced, a motion was made by Tony Moreno and seconded by Gary Wallace to approve the minutes as written. With a vote being called the vote was as follows: Ayes: Ernie Evans, David Richmond, Gary Wallace, Tony Moreno and Keith Van Dine. Abstention: Joyce Briscoe (absent at said meeting). #6 Status of Final Plats: There were none to report. 3 . . . . . #7 BOA Actions: Joyce reported that the Board of Adjustment had denied the request for the rear yard setback at 1683 Fir Circle. It was determined that the patio slab, was in fact a part of the foundation, that the slabs are joined with steel. The depth of the slab would also allow a permanent structure to be placed and since there won't be anyway to track the future use, a building could be erected on this slab. With this in mine, the BOA voted unanimously to deny the request. #8 Citizen's Input Other Than Agenda Items: There were none present. #9 Consider and Make Recommendation: On request for proposed street name changes to Woodbridge Subdivision Unit 1 & 2, Schertz Parkway. Ernie Evans pointed out that the motion on the above request would be made in a form a motion that would be forward to City Council. At this time, Ernie Evans asked for staff input. Steve Simonson stated that five (5) letters were sent out to the prospective property buyers and the owners of the subdivision. There were two (2) letters received, one in favor and one opposed. The one opposed was from Mr. Brad Gala developer of the subdivision. Also, a letter from the Post Office approving the name changes, the original letter from the prospective homebuyer Mr. Sheerin, and verbal this evening plus a letter from the builder Highland Homes. The packet also includes a letter from the city fire department agreeing to the name change. 4 . . . Tony Moreno questioned that the letter from the homebuilder, Highland Homes was not signed however, Mr. Danny Tackett representing Highland stated in the public hearing that the company did endorse the name change. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Tony Moreno and seconded by Gary Wallace to forward recommending approval to the City Council the request for proposed street name change to Woodbridge Subdivision Unit 1 & 2. With the vote being called, the motion was approved. #10 Consider and Make Recommendation: On a request from Schertz- Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District (SCUC ISD) for a special exception to the zoning ordinance of a front yard setback from 25' to 15' for placement of portable classroom structure. Steve Simonson stated that the request is pretty straightforward, as indicated by the . drawing the extra-proposed portable classrooms that the ISD is dealing with a situation has turned up. To have the proper fire spacing between the units and from having to place the units into the ball field area the variance request is for one classroom to encroach 5' into the 25' front building setback on Elbel Road. At this time, Joyce Briscoe mentioned that because she is an employee of the Independent School District (ISD) she feels it is appropriate to recuse herself from the agenda item, she will not participate in discussion or vote on item #10. Chairman Evans duly noted it. Gary Wallace mentioned that the request is showing 30' at the front building setback, however it was stated that the setback is 25'. Is that correct and was advised that was correct. Ernie Evans stated that the color map provided this evening has two areas; one area . appears in blue and the other in gray. Are we to assume the area in blue is the area we 5 . . . . . are dealing with this evening and the area in gray represents a future issue? Chairman Evans was advised that is the understanding from the city staff. The issue before the Commission this evening is the variance request for the one classroom encroachment of 5' into the 25' front building setback, however if they continue to build classrooms they will come back to the Commission as another variance request. Tony Moreno asked for clarification between Phase I and Phase II? Tony Moreno was advised that Phase I are existing classrooms with 1-13 units. Phase II are the proposed future classrooms. Ernie Evans asked what is the projection to fixing the problem without using portable classrooms? Mr. Reymann stated that if the bond issue passes the school district is projecting a new high school opening in the year 2004. If it doesn't pass we don't know what we will do. Classrooms would have to be built into the softball field area at the front of the parking area and they don't want classrooms there. Ernie Evans questioned if the classrooms are large enough to accommodate the volume of children. Mr. Reymann stated that of demographic study done, the 20 portable classrooms could turn into 32 portables, which is of great concern. If they became necessary, the only other possible area would be at the central office location. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Gary Wallace and seconded by Tony Moreno to forward recommending approval to the Board of Adjustment the request from Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District (SCUC ISD) for a special exception to the zoning ordinance of a front yard setback from 25' to 15' for placement of portable classroom structure. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. #11 Consider and Take Appropriate Action: Kaufman & Broad for sign placement on FM3009. On Bandit Sign application from 6 . . . . . Steve Simonson stated that the request meets the new city requirement in the UDC, which was placed in the UDC in order to gain control of the bandit sign issue. The requirements have been worked out with the Inspection Department; the signs will be marked with the appropriate Schertz symbol. If signs without the symbol are found these signs would be in violation and go through the appropriate process. The builders have been notified with a letter by the inspection department, and Kaufman & Broad are the first seeking approval. Steve Simonson stated that the diagram indicating the placement of the letters "S", "L", and "R" identifies signs on FM3009, which are indicating which signs are facing "straight" and which signs are at the "left" and "right" of the subdivision entrance. This builder is requesting eleven signs, however twelve signs are the UDC requirement. The builder will be issued the number requested, whether it is eleven or twelve signs and still stay within the City Ordinance. Steve also mentioned that before the first quarter of the year, all signs would be picked up, except the requests that have gone through the Planning & Zoning Commission and received approval. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Keith Van Dine and seconded by David Richmond to approve the request for a bandit sign application from Kaufman & Broad for sign placement on FM3009. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. #12 Consider and Take Appropriate Action: On a request from Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Bob Bomer Oldsmobile Subdivision. Steve Simonson stated that the entire area (19 acres) that was purchased is shown along with the water easement. The two lots that are to be platted are shown, along with the 60' ROW that is to be the commercial road (Victoria Lane) that would eventually connect to Schertz Parkway. All appropriate information is provided; lots have been 7 . . . labeled Block1, lot 1 & 2, site map, width of Schertz Parkway, property owners, and floodplain. David Richmond stated that the acreage through the entire document is incorrect. On every page the acreage indicated is different from the last. In trying to come up with 7.413 acres was difficult, because in adding up the different areas coming up the correct number was not easy. Dennis Rion representing Pape Dawson Consulting Engineers stated that the acreage would be checked and corrected on the final plat. Gary Wallace stated that in his opinion the request for the variance is too broad, if the pad site is not to be part of the car lot, justification for the variance does not apply. Mr. Rion stated that at this time they are withdrawing the variance request for Block 1, lot 2, the request would only apply to Block 1, lot 1, which is the car lot. . With no further discussion, a motion was made by David Richmond and seconded by Gary Wallace to approve the request from Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. for preliminary plat approval of Bob Bomer Oldsmobile Subdivision provided that the engineers insure that the acreage throughout the plat is correct. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. #13 Consider and Take Appropriate Action: On a request from Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. for site plan approval of Bob Bomer Oldsmobile and variance request to Article VIII: Landscaping & Screening 4.2; requirement of 4" DBH per 50' of street frontage. Steve Simonson stated that the request is a variable page outline of a site plan, which include the lighting, landscape, site plan itself, pictures of fencing, buildings with sizes and parking lot with number of spaces outlined. Also included are the trees saved, trees . removed, tree summary, and as mentioned in my notes a tree disparity that has been 8 . . . discussed with the engineer. The disparity is in the city's favor not the developer. The first page of the document indicates the trees, tree mitigation, Victoria Lane ROW, buildings, building layout, l' non-access easement, and the proposed pylon sign meets the city sign ordinance. Ernie Evans at this time asked Dennis Rion to repeat the statement made previously in regard to the variance request associated to Article VII. Mr. Dennis Rion reiterated his statement that the variance request is broad and covers both lots Block 1, lot 1 & 2. We ask that the variance request be limited to Block 1, lot 1. Mr. Rion mentioned that the frontage of block 1, lot 1, would add up to approximately 5 trees of 4" caliber. In that same area they persevered 635" which is 59% of the tree count, and as for block 1, lot 2 it is not introduced for site plan approval this evening. In discussion among the Commission in regard to the tree count it was mentioned that of 69 trees counted, 30 would be salvaged, is that correct to assume? Mr. Rion stated . that he believes that is correct and mentioned that the focus was to save all the large trees. Gary Wallace asked that is it correct to assume that in the count of 497" of mitigation, does it include mitigation of trees associated with the variance request? Steve Simonson replied it does not, unless the trees are included in the count of 497" versus the 449". Gary Wallace mentioned that this is among one of the first businesses that the Commission has considered with the tree ordinance in place. There are several car dealerships in the surrounding areas that have trees; "Cavender Dealership" comes to mine. He understands what is being said and tends to agree; however the Commission needs to establish the tree ordinance for future issues. As a Commission we can not allow one business and not the other, turning down a request for whatever reason, and not have had this development mitigate on the trees not planted. Gary concluded that . 9 . . . the Commission could waive the trees, however believes the trees should be part of the mitigation process. Steve Simonson stated that if the Commission wishes it could be part of the recommendation. He would have to research and come up with the right count, which he believes it to be 5 inches of 4 DBH trees would be 20" added to the 497". If this number (20") would be correct it would be included as part of the mitigation. Joyce Briscoe commented that it was very disappointing that the trees aren't wanted, and mentioned that there are several dealerships with trees that are absolutely beautiful. These are dealerships she would want to shop at, rather than on hot concrete and asphalt. Dennis Rion stated that a lot of effort has gone into saving the trees along the proposed commercial road, which he believes, will be a nice fill. Also saved were several monster . trees along the south property line. Mr. Rion stated that it was at the suggestion from dealership management that no obstruction was wanted along IH35. Joyce Briscoe and David Richmond both stated that they would like to see a few trees along the frontage of IH35. David Richmond stated that he is very much against the variance, it's only 5 trees. Trees could be chosen that would be below the height of the authorized sign of 47', and when these trees mature he believes it would greatly enhance the presentation of the dealership along the access road. In discussion among the Commission in regard to the tree preservation document there were a number of trees that are mentioned twice (#1150) and numbers (#1141) that weren't shown. Mr. Rion addressed the issue of the two number (1150's), these were tagged out in the field as 2-18" oak trees, which reflect double trunk trees. The numbers not shown for instance number (1141) are within the building footprint and are not part of the mitigation process. . 10 . . . There was some discussion on how to deal with the request; should it be treated as two separate issues or treated as one issue? Chairman Evans stated that whatever action was taken it should be made in one motion, and treated it as one issue, since the variance request was part of the submitted package. Mr. Rion addressed the Commission before the motion and asked that even though it would be one motion, could there be a distinction between the variance request and site plan approval, and was advised that was the intent. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Gary Wallace and seconded by Keith Van Dine to approval the site plan submitted by Pape-Dawson Engineers for the Bob Bomer Oldsmobile and deny the variance request to Article VIII: Landscaping & Screening 4.2; requirement of 4" DBH per 50' of street frontage. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. . #14 Consider and Take Appropriate Action: On a request from Mark A. Jackson Engineer for site plan approval of Sonic at Corridor Loop Road. Steve Simonson stated that the site plan has been discussed with the developers and advised that the signs would only be allowed in the appropriate approved area of Corridor Loop Road. One of the approved areas being at the Taco Cabana and Schlotzsky's sign on FM3009. The other is at IH35 at the Taco Cabana/Schlotzsky's sign. A freestanding sign is not allowed on the site. Also shown is the dumpster enclosure and how traffic would move in the area. The second page indicates the proposed landscaping, however the tree mitigation for the road loop being over 800' would require approximately 15 trees of 4" DBH or less trees at a larger DBH. The number of trees shown on the landscape plan does not meet the requirement. Joyce Briscoe asked that if there were provisions for irrigating the areas landscaped, and was advised by Mr. Mark Jackson contractor for the Sonic development that . provisions were made. 11 . . . Gary Wallace asked what is the distance of the arc at the front of the property line, and was advised it was 382.33'. Mr. Jackson stated that Sonic would do whatever necessary to comply with the requirement in regard to the tree issue. There was some question as to the correct distance at the front property line and in further research was determined that the correct distance was 382.33'. Mr. Jackson acknowledged that the site plan was not in complaince and will gladly do the number of trees required. Steve Simonson apologized for the error made on the distance at the front property line which in fact was 382.33', which means that to meet the requirement the developer would need 5 trees to comply with the tree ordinance. The Commission was advised by the developer that more trees would be planted then the required 5 trees of 4" DBH. More trees will be planted using a 2" DBH, which would allow for more trees than the requirement. Gary Wallace mentioned that the sign height was incorrect, and was advised by Mr. . Jackson that it was an error, and asked if accommodation could be made for the sign issue? Gary Wallace stated that typically site plans are introduced "letter perfect" due to the inspection department working off these plans out in the field. Steve Simonson mentioned that some time ago the Commission approved a site plan contingent upon corrections where the developer was asked to make the necessary corrections and provide copies to city staff and the Commission. However, it was some time ago and it hasn't been done lately. Gary Wallace asked that would city staff be willing to accept a site plan approval contingent upon corrections, and was advised it would be up to the Commission to make that decision. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Keith Van Dine and seconded by Gary Wallace to approve the request from Mark A. Jackson Engineer for site plan approval of Sonic at Corridor Loop Road pending the corrections and additions of the trees and sign issues as discussed. With a vote being called, the vote was as follows: . 12 . . . Ayes: Gary Wallace, Tony Moreno, Joyce Briscoe, David Richmond and Keith Van Dine. Opposed: Ernie Evans. Motion carries. #15 Consider and Take Appropriate Action: On a request from Texas Shine Inc., for short form Final Plat approval of Texas Shine Subdivision, FM3009. Steve Simonson stated that as he mentioned in his notes this is an area that doesn't require any additional utilities or street frontage. All signatures are affixed the 19" drainage easement that is shown is across the property and does not continue outside the property. This is prior agreement with the Barshop Company and the Texas Shine development. It also happens to be an agreement with the City of Schertz to correct the drainage along FM3009 from Forest Ridge Subdivision down through the out fall underneath FM3009. It is in the process of being bid by the Barshop Company and will . be corrected and built correctly. The Barshop Company is requiring that Texas Shine show the drainage easement across the property. Mr. Simonson mentioned that he has seen the site plan on this development and stated that it will fit and work within the area. The development also has agreements with the utility providers to use the area for parking and driving under the utility easement. These agreements will be provided as part of the site plan when it is introduced. The 25' building setback from the Forbese property is required by law, being that it is a residential area. All other surrounding property owners are labeled. Ernie Evans asked that if the site plan were approved would it not cut off any potential access for Wiederstein Road to continue onto FM3009? Steve Simonson stated that it wouldn't cut off any potential access, however it could if the doesn't continue through, and part of this area could create a problem. It won't cut it off, however the development Texas Shine is aware about the road. There is no agreement with Texas Shine to bring the road across their property. . 13 . . . Ernie Evans cautioned the Commission in their deliberation in regard to this issue. The Commission has held firm with a previous developer in the completion of Wiederstein Road through a particular piece of property. David Richmond asked if the lawsuit was still pending with the developer the City is working with in the completion of Wiederstein Road and was advised yes. Mr. John Elorriaga representing Texas Shine stated that the situation that the City of Schertz is in is with Barshop & Oles, Corridor Properties, and others. Texas Shine, Inc. is purchasing 1.823 acres on FM3009, and are also documenting and recording the LCRA easements and the CPS easements. The development is essentially on the southerly side of the Forbese property and Texas Shine has no interest in keeping the City of Schertz from developing in a manner that the City of Schertz feels is necessary. Mr. Elorriaga stressed that it was extremely important for this development to proceed and obtain approval of the plat. Mr. Elorriaga mentioned that his clients are aware that . Wiederstein Road is anticipated for extension, and that currently it is involved in litigation. Mr. Elorriaga further stated that Texas Shine doesn't have a problem working with the City of Schertz in trying to meet the master plan needs. However, it is critical for Texas Shine to proceed with obtaining approval of the plat and move forward with the site plan submittal. Ernie Evans stated that a site plan doesn't have anything to do with proposed future construction or easements that are set aside of roadways etc., these sort of issues are dealt with in the platting process. Ernie Evans stated that he can not speak for the rest of the Commission, however personally speaking he can not vote for the approval of the plat since the proper negotiation with other property owners have not been done. The plat before the Commission can not attest to right of ways, etc. that have been provided or could be based upon the property or the use of the property or how the development would move around in the future when a site plan was introduced. A site plan would have to account to whatever was on a plat. . 14 . . . . . Mr. Elorriaga thanked Chairman Evans for his statement, however would offer as well, it is Texas Shine that is proposing to plat 250' of frontage on FM3009 be obligated under a master plan to provide right-of-way through the development? Mr. Elorriaga stated that if the City of Schertz requires the right-of-way, Texas Shine is welling to make a concession pending any re-negotiation with seller of the property. Texas Shine should not have to pay the penalty of eight years of negotiation with the landowner and City of Schertz. Texas Shine wants to comply with all the city regulations and have done so. In conclusion, Mr. Elorriaga asked that the Commission approve the plat in order to move forward with the project, or let us know it isn't possible, so we may look into the purchase of another piece of property. A brief discussion followed in regard to the extension of Weiderstein Road where it was mentioned that at first the road was to run on both sides of the CPS alignment. However, when the LCRA line came into the picture there was some question of how the road would line; in and out. Steve commented that Texas Shine is facing double trouble due to the two lines across the property and the narrowness of developable information. This is the reason the request is before the Commission this evening. These are issues that need to be addressed before the site plan is submitted. Steve concluded that the alignment is an issue that needs to be dealt with. This issue was briefly discussed with the client and they were aware of the road and the exact alignment. David Richmond reminded everyone of the briefing that was given by Mr. Sanditen on the continuing problem with litigation in regard to the LCRA easement. The Commission was shown various ways that he could or could not develop the remaining property depending on LCRA and how the court would render judgement. David mentioned that at that time the Commission expressed concern that Wiederstein Road continuing onto FM3009 was still a requirement of the City. David stated that he has a continuing concern in doing any development on FM3009 frontage proximate the area under litigation given that the outcome is unknown. David stated that he well understands that 15 - . . it might hamper development over the area but doesn't think necessarily so, because it is a vital concern for the City's road plan. Ernie Evans questioned the building site and was advised the building would be built on the southerly side of the property, and that actually are trying to contain as much within the buildable area. Gary Wallace asked if there would be a problem placing a road easement through the development if an agreement could be reached with Barshop? Mr. Elorriaga stated that Texas Shine is willing to make a concession to the City to accommodate the right-of- way. Mr. Elorriaga also mentioned that Texas Shine has complied with all the City requirements in regard to platting and believes that Master Plan issues are not so precisely defined to detect that Texas Shine development needs to reserve property for the extension of Wiederstein Road. Mr. Elorriaga stated that this is an issue between Forest Ridge and Barshop & Oles and not Texas Shine. Mr. Elorriaga asked that . Texas Shine not be burden with solving problems that have been issue for many years. Texas Shine is willing to work with the City of Schertz but most important wants to move forward with the project; is willing to entertain any desires or requests within reason, however if the development can not be done please tell us now. Ernie Evans stated that at this time the Commission hasn't taken action on the request and added that regardless of how long something has been going on, streets don't get built today or tomorrow, they get built over years so that master road plan has been in existences. Therefore, if Texas Shine is a development it is affected whether you purchase property this year or ten years from now. Ernie Evans stated that the results of the outcome this evening should tell you how serious or lacks, the City is in regard to the master road plan. . 16 . . . . . At this time, Texas Shine agreed to make reservation on the site plan for the extension of Wieder stein Road. In further discussion, in regard to requirements of the Weiderstein road extension would need to be part of the platting process. One of the requirements being that one of the developers that wanted to development on FM3009 would have to show the 60' ROW through the property. Steve Simonson stated that City Staff is willing to work with Texas Shine to make sure the alignment of the right-of-way is what is required by the city, which is a 60' ROW. Steve Simonson commented that if Texas Shine is willing to work with the City in the road extension by showing it on the plat, the Commission will be looking at a plat with the ROW information shown and site plan. Mr. Elorriaga stated that Texas Shine would solely dedicate ROW to the City of Schertz, however will not be responsible for any construction of the ROW. With no further discussion, a motion was made by Gary Wallace and seconded by Keith Van Dine to disapprove the request from Texas Shine Inc., for short form Final Plat approval of Texas Shine Subdivision, FM3009 due to failure to provide right-of-way access across the property for the extension of Weiderstein Road. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. #16 Consider and Make Recommendation: Selection of applicant for vacancy on Planning & Zoning Commission; William W. Sommers and David F. Allen. Ernie Evans stated that this issue was tabled at the last meeting and will have to be taken off the table in order to take action. 17 e . . At this time, David Richmond made a motion that was seconded by Keith Van Dine to take off the table agenda item #16. With a vote being called, the motion was approved. Ernie Evans stated that a form has been provided so the Commission may vote and make a selection on the applicants submitted. Tony Moreno questioned the letter in regard to Mr. Sommers residence, the letter mentions that remodeling of his home; however it does not specify whether it will be months or weeks before competition. Tony was advised it would be 3 to 4 months. Steve Simonson stated that the third applicant (Mr. Wolgast) had been contacted as requested by the Commission and staff was advised that because of school commitment would have to withdraw the application. Ernie Evans stated that discussion was held in regard to the two applicants at the last . meeting and asked if anyone needed a review. Joyce Briscoe stated that she would abstain from the voting. William W. Sommers and David F. Allen are the applicants and after a brief discussion and votes tallied, William W. Sommers was selected. Ernie Evans asked that a letter be sent to City Council with the Commission's recommendation. Ernie also asked that Mr. Sommers be notified of the Commission selection. #17 General Discussion: . 18 . . . Tony Moreno: Tony passed around a letter from Maureen Goodrich facilitator of the FM78 Landscape committee where it reports on the goals the committee is working on. Gary Wallace: Gary had no comments. Keith Van Dine: Keith made mention of the Sonic at Corridor Loop plat that was approved previously contingent upon the submittal of corrected copy to city staff. . Joyce Briscoe: . Joyce mentioned that she has noticed that local banks have banners hanging from the building and wants to know if the Commission has some concern. She believes it junks up the building and the community, and if there isn't an ordinance we might look into one. Joyce asked if it were possible to advertise in the city newsletter asking civic groups to adopt a section of FM3009 and help clean up the trash. Keith Van Dine stated that the juvenile probation department utilities the juvenile kids on probation in the City of Seguin to clean up along the roads. Keith stated that he would look into providing this service in the City of Schertz with the appropriate people. 19 . . . David Richmond: David voiced concern in regard to the Texas Shine development in making sure the development grants right-of-way and that the City of Schertz has some way of getting a road to the right-of-way. Ken Greenwald: Ken reported that growth is here, BVY A doubled in the number of children in the baseball program from approximately 30 to 41 teams. The city has run out of ball fields. Ken mentioned discussion of a bond issue, because something needs to be done. Steve Simonson: . Steve reported that the highway is looking at the traffic problem on FM3009 and IH35. They are looking at maybe placing and island and cut off the cross traffic. There are several things that are being looked at. The Border Town on IH35 is looking at the middle of March, to be open. The sewer situation on FM3009 and the Diehart Industrial Park by the railroad tracks is under development; the bids are out at this time. All the developers out in that area got together to provide a pump system for the area. Steve reported that Brad Galo has purchased property adjacent to the Cal- T ex development and has plan for an industrial park in that area. Steve mentioned that the City will come close to 18,000 in population when the Census takes count. Steve doesn't see any slowing down in retail, housing or industrial . development any time soon. 20 . . . . . Steve also mentioned that he will have surgery done in March and will be out of the office March 1st through the ih. Ernie Evans: Ernie made mention of an article in the Express News in regard to Parkland fees which was an interesting article. Ernie also mentioned articles of interest in the Planning and Zoning report which deals with Billboards an article in the Planning digest on the greening of infrastructure. #18 ADJOURNMENT: David Richmond moved to adjourn the meeting. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion. The meeting adjourned at 9:10 p.m. ! 1 /r; / , ..'! ,)' 1/ ;' /ul~--~-/::-(':'(j-t"-I''-<)/2 Chairman, Planning & zoniig Commission ATTEST: '---/)'/I,:(/;c; '/1J'-/'/j> \,. .... 21