Loading...
09-26-1995 PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing on Tuesday, September 26, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal Complex Conference Room, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas. Those present were as follows: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CITY STAFF PIA JARMAN, CHAIRWOMAN STEVE SIMONSON, DAVID RICHMOND, VICE-CHAIRMAN ASST. CITY MANAGER MERWIN WILLMAN, SECRETARY DENISE GRANGER, TONY MORENO PLANNING SECRETARY KEITH VAN DINE ERNIE EVANS KEN GREENWALD, COUNCILMAN MEMBERS ABSENT OTHERS PRESENT BOB ANDREWS (Medical) Don McCrary, McCrary and Associates James Brannon, County Commissioner Sam Bledsoe, MBC Engineers Roger Nichols, 120 Webster Richard Dubin, 117 Webster Donald Young, 116 Webster Dave Jackson, 124 Webster ~1 CALL TO ORDER Chairwoman Pia Jarman called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. Pia Jarman explained the procedures to be followed at the public hearing and thanked everyone for their concerned interest. The City Council public hearing on this item will be held October 3, 1995. ~2 PUBLIC HEARING: To Receive Citizen Input on a Reguest from James Sagebiel, Guadalupe County Court House Annex Offices to rezone approximately five (5) Acres on Elbel Road from R-1 (Single Family Dwelling District) to Public Use District. (ZC #123) Steve Simonson advised there were 19 letters sent out to the appropriate land owners within 200' according to the ordinance. There were two (2) letters returned in favor of the rezoning. James Brannon County Commissioner advised they are hoping to build a building approximately between 5,000 and 8,000 square feet. The building will contain the tax office, juvenile probation, JP set up for Judge Slaughter, adult probation offices, and public meeting area. There are plans to put the parking in the flood plain area. Roger Nichols 120 Webster, explained he lives on Webster which is adjacent to the property in question. Mr. Nichols asked for clarification on precisely were the location of the building and the parking lot will be, and about the large lot in proportion, adjacent to the drainage ditch. Steve Simonson advised the property will parallel the drainage ditch straight back to the back of the homes on Webster and back out to Elbel Road. James Brannon explained the County's proposed plan is to rezone 5 acres of the 375.49 from the back side of the drainage ditch. When the 100 year flood plan is surveyed out, about 50~ of the property is in the flood plain. You are able to build in that type of area but the buildings would need to be raised. The intent of the County is to build the parking lot in the flood plain area which is authorized. The entrance would be off Elbel Road with about a 30' driveway. The intent is to route the traffic along the back side of the building with the main parking in the flood plain and around the front and sides of the building. Roger Nichols asked how much acreage there is between the proposed lot and FM 3009. James Brannon advised about 4.45 acres. The question is if a good chunk of the property is taken, which of course is the cheaper chunk the property along FM 3009 and the corner with a more significant value, with it being a smaller portion will be left. With the probable value of the property it does seem to be feasible that someone would want the property kept R-l. Is it the intent of the Commission in a month or a year to want the property rezoned and now we have commercial development that will cause trash in our back yards, noise from the traffic and parking. "If the remaining property on FM 3009 is kept R-1 then a developer could come in and develop a small subdivision but with only about 4 acres that is very doubtful. At that time a developer is going to come before the Commission and want the zoning changed to commercial, then we are going to have Pat Booker Road in our back yard. This is my concern as well as many of my neighbors." Chairwoman Jarman advised that this also is a concern of the Commission tht FM 3009 not ever look like Pat Booker Road. David Jackson, 124 Webster, mentioned that the neighbors have all discussed this situation and are not coming to the meeting without any knowledge. They recognize no one has developed in the area on -2- FM 3009 because of the expense of the property. "We all feel Mr. Brannon's plan is reasonable and wish the County would purchase the whole corner." Mr. Jackson stated he personally, as one of the affected property owners, feels this is the least intrusive and probably the best use for this property and would like to see a commitment by the Planning and Zoning Commission to try and hold the zoning to something non intrusive because it is R-1 zoning. We know it will change but we would like the Planning and Zoning Commission to at least think in the future, if it is going to be commercial, to at least limit the commerciality of the property to a nonintrusive type of development. "We would like a commitment from the Commission that they would do their best to do this and we would support the County having their offices on this side of the County which is needed." Roger Nichols asked if there is anything that may be coming in that addresses the use of the 4 acres on FM 3009. Also, if it is the intent of the Commission to recommend to City Council that that portion of the property not being bought by the County stay zoned R-1. Steve Simonson advised that at this time there have been no inquires about the piece of property on the corner. Pia Jarman stated that the Commission can only address the issue that has been brought before the Commission by the County which is the rezoning of the 5 acres. It is indeed a concern and the desire of the Commission that the residential areas stay residential and development be non intrusive. Richard Dublin, 117 Webster, mentioned he expresses the same feeling as the preceding gentlemen. The question he has, was the statement that the level of the foundation of the building will be raised and by how much? James Brannon advised about 3' to go with the current land area on the downward side and almost level with the upward side. Until the engineers have surveyed the property it is hard to tell. It may be a little higher than Elbel Road. The entrance to the County Offices will be off Elbel Road. The reason for wanting this property is the location and also the offices had to be within Precinct 3 line by state law. The County has looked at all the property that was available in the area but most of the property cost too much. Steve Simonson mentioned that the site plan would still need to be brought before the Commission which at that time will be reviewed on how the building, landscaping and how the parking will be laid out. The request tonight is for the rezoning of the property. Donald Young, 116 Webster, questioned if the easement (ROW) behind the fence behind the houses on Webster will continue to be maintained. -3- Steve Simonson advised you can not build on any utility easements and yes, it will still be maintained. There being no other questions or discussion, the Public Hearing on the rezoning for the Guadalupe County Annex Offices was closed. #3 ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING: Chairwoman Pia Jarman adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:23 p.m. The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened in a regular session, after the public hearing. #4 CALL TO ORDER: Chairwoman Pia Jarman called the September 26, 1995 regular meeting to order at 7:24 p.m. #5 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Session for September 12, 1995. Denise Granger advised on page 2, second to the last line the word need will need to be deleted. Mervin Willman moved to approve the September 12, 1995 Regular Session Minutes as amended. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion, which carried with a unanimous vote. #6 CITIZENS: INPUT OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS There were none. #7 CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION: Request from James Sagebiel, Guadalupe County Court House Annex Offices to rezone approximately five (5) Acres on Elbel Road from R-1 (Single Family Dwelling District) to Public Use District. (ZC #123) Steve Simonson advised a correction to the minutes of the Public Hearing. There were four (4) letters returned at the Public Hearing making the total returned six (6). With the letters returned this evening two (2) were in favor and two (2) were opposed. The overall count on the 19 letters sent: six (6) returned, four (4) in favor and two (2) opposed. Steve Simonson mentioned one of the opposed was worried about the easement (ROW) not being maintained. The other opposed was worried about the four (4) acres that is being left as R-1. Mervin Willman commented that there was a comment that they would like the Commission to make a commitment on the four (4) acres. The Commission can not make this type of commitment. -4- Pia Jarman mentioned that the Commission did not make a commitment as such, it was stated that the Commission is very vigilant on not turning it into a Pat Booker Road. Keith Van Dine asked if the property becomes County property, with them advising what they will be putting on the property, if they are not going to be using the whole five (5) acres can they use the property for something else? Steve Simonson stated it is his understanding from the preliminary talks most of the property is going to be parking with an area being left for the expansion of the building. They will not be putting in a road equipment maintenance area. This will be a municipal building. When the site plan comes in if there is any questions on what the land will be used for in the future it will be checked into. Mervin Willman moved to recommend to City Council that five (5) acres of land located on Elbel Road be rezoned from R-1 (Single Family Dwelling District) to PU (Public Use). Keith Van Dine seconded the motion which, carried with a unanimous vote. #8 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Request from Sam Bledsoe, MBC Engineers, for Final Plat Approval for Greenshire Unit 6. (PC #233-95) Steve Simonson stated that they have paid the park land fees this evening. The 50' building set back along FM 3009 for lots 13 - 16, the 1' non access easement along Woodland Oaks Drive, the request for the side yard minimum of the 15' between buildings has also been corrected. The only correction left is the flood plain information to July 17, 1995 and the letter C to D. The preliminary plat has been approved with the requested corrections on the final plat Mervin Willman asked if they would need a variance for the cul-de-sac as it looks to be over 500' on Birchwood Circle. Steve Simonson stated it is a 50' radius and 100' width which is required in the subdivision ordinance. There are 23 large lots with the cul-de-sac being close to the 500'. Tony Moreno mentioned without a scale it does not appear to be over 500'. Steve Simonson commented there will be a brick wall on FM 3009 from the end of their property line to the drainage ditch. This is a requirement that has been made with the developer in the master plan. The developer has taken the wall past what was required. There also will be one on Woodland Oaks Drive. The developer has done a very timely and creditable job from a staff point of view. Ernie Evans mentioned the unplatted area which is also the drainage area will still be maintained by the homeowners association. Steve Simonson stated it still needs to be formally turned over but the -5- homeowners association will be responsible for that area. In the former minutes there was an agreement for them to maintain that property. Because they were turning over about 32 acres of green space to the homeowners association they were allowed half price on their fee per lot in the park dedication fees. Mervin Willman asked if all of the drainage area would be turned into a park, if so wouldn't it need to be shown as common area on the plat? Steve Simonson advised it is up to the homeowners association, if the whole area will be a park. At some time it will need to be shown as common area before the subdivision is finished. When this area was originally platted the roads were the only thing platted (Woodland Oaks Drive and Greenshire Drive). Greenshire Oaks was platted separately by itself. The flood plain was what needed to be really defined. On the last plat that comes before the Commission the area will have to be shown as common area. David Richmond asked Mr. Bledsoe if the intent is to leave the 50' set back on FM 3009 as it exists today, "natural" to the building set back line. Mr. Bledsoe advised that the wall will be in someone's back yard. The houses will not be able to encroach into the 50' setback. The actual wall on FM 3009 is in the ROW line. David Richmond believed the intent of earlier discussions was to have a buffer off FM 3009 to insure the 50' set back that is strictly to be left natural. Sam Bledsoe advised that the lots are extra deep with the intent of the 50' setback as a buffer. Sam Bledsoe mentioned that also all of the utilities will be in the front yard. Steve Simonson advised that the wall was put in lieu of the 20' green belt. The purpose was so it cannot be looked into peoples homes from the road. Ernie Evans asked for clarification that the common area on the final plat be noted that the homeowners association will be liable for the area. Steve Simonson agreed that the final plat of the subdivision will need to have all that information mentioned on it to be able to be approved. Mervin Willman moved to approve the final plat from Sam Bledsoe, MBC Engineers, for Greenshire Unit 6 contingent upon the flood plain statement date and panel number being corrected. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion which carried with a unanimous vote. ~9 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Request from Don McCrary, McCrary & Associates for Arby's Subdivision. (PC #249-95) A. Site Plan Approval B. Preliminary and Final Plat Approval -6- Steve Simonson requested that A and B be reversed as the plat has to be approved before a site plan can be approved. The Commission agreed for the change. B. Preliminary and Final Plat Approval: Merwin Willman questioned the 30' access easement being shown within this lot 10, block 2. Steve Simonson advised that is where it should be as it is an easement, not a ROW. Steve Simonson commented that Don McCrary representing Arby's is present for any questions the Commission may have. The owner of the property, Zemex International has been in contact. The road will be built as a private road. This is the reason it has been stated on plats as an easement instead of ROW. A ROW connotes that it is city property, easement connotes it is private and they must maintain it. This is a private agreement between all of the businesses and land owner in the area to build what amounts to a private road between the businesses. The reason for this is the developer, Zemex, is getting each person involved to help defray the cost buy putting in money per square foot of their property along the easement. Merwin Willman asked if the easement would be included in other future lots. Steve Simonson advised to be able to get to other businesses that will be developing in the area access to the private road will need to be extended. Steve Simonson mentioned the flood plain statement, and the front building set back on FM 3009 should be 15'not 25' and will need to be corrected on the final plat. He explained the discrepancy: "When I came to work here, there were no set backs for the general business area anywhere. At the time when I was asked about the setbacks I stated 25'which is for residential." The reason it has come up is because Arby's has a very narrow lot and the parking was going to be a problem with handicap parking. Along FM 3009 the plat will read 15' building set back on Triton, it will not be a problem. David Richmond asked if the front building set back for the businesses would need to be an issue that should be addressed now or will the new UDC take care of it? Steve Simonson advised in the new UDC it will be taken care of. David Richmond asked about the location map on the left corner of the site plan being different from that on the plat. Steve Simonson explained the plat is showing the location map correctly, the location map on the site plan will need to be corrected. Pia Jarman reiterated what needs to be corrected are the front building setback, the flood plain information, and the location map on the site plan. Ernie Evans asked about CPS of San Antonio servicing the area. -7- Steve Simonson advised CPS services all of IH 35 which is a standard statement that CPS requires on all plats that have service areas that they service. The CPS service area is from Wiederstein Road and above, below is GVEC service. Ernie Evans moved to approve the preliminary and final plat from Don McCrary, McCrary & Associates for Arby's Subdivision contingent upon the flood plan statement correction, 15' setback on FM 3009 and the location map. David Richmond seconded the motion which carried with a unanimous vote. A. Site Plan: Steve Simonson mentioned you can see how they want to put a race track around Arby's. They have after submitting 4 site plans, agreed to put the handicap parking spaces against the building. The lot is very narrow. They want exposure on FM 3009, with traffic off Trition, and the easement which is on their own property. They are also requesting a 100' sign. They have been told that there is not a sign in the area higher than 75' the 250 square foot sign is not a problem nor the location of the sign. The Commission will have to address the height of the sign they are willing to allow. The other item that is missing is the common sign that would be located on the access road for the businesses to use. It maybe that such a sign is not needed but we do need to find out if the sign is going to be erected. Don McCrary stated he was not informed on any common sign going in the area but is in agreement that if it is it will need to be either shown on Arby's or Jack-N-Box's lot. Mr. McCrary mentioned he would look into the situation of the common sign. Steve Simonson commented that there was an agreement for the common sign, so at some time there will need to be a decision if the sign is going to be used. The reason this sign needs to be mentioned is there will in the future be businesses going in on Trition Drive and you would want to know what businesses are down in that area with a 25' road developing. Before the sign, which is a specialized multipurpose sign, can be approved it will have to come before the Commission. With the sign not being shown on the plat they will not be able to just put it in. David Richmond mentioned do we at this time feel the need for another sign in the area. Ernie Evans questioned all the egress from the building being across or through the drive-through window. Steve Simonson advised that is correct, with the exception of the handicap parking being up by the building. Don McCrary stated the site plan is a standard design for Arby's. You place your order on one side and drive through. Steve Simonson mentioned most of the parking in other businesses -g- with the drive-through windows, have some parking away from the drive-through window but they all do have some parking that does cross the drive-through window. The main reason for the Arby's being a problem was that the handicap parking was located originally in an area where they would have to walk across the drive-through window traffic. It has now been changed for the handicap parking to be up against the building. Merwin Willman questioned if there would be enough lights to illuminate the parking lot. Don McCrary advised that when they do the final design on the lighting they may decide to add more. At this time the fixture locations are not exact. Merwin Willman commented on the entrances and exits on to the easement. Will it be completed by the time Arby's finishes construction. Don McCrary advised that the contract has been signed for a concrete driveway and construction should be starting any time. Ernie Evans mentioned the sign of 100' height versus 75'. Steve Simonson advised this issue does need to be addressed with the other signs in the area being less than 100'. With no other business having a problem with only a 75' foot sign this issue needs to be addressed. Keith Van Dine questioned regarding the common sign, electing not to have it. Steve Simonson advised that the requirement for that common sign was that they would have to come before the Commission for approval. They were told they could have the pile-on common sign but would need to come before the Commission for approval as it was never stated where it would go or what it would look like. Pia Jarman asked if the completion of the access road behind Jack-N-Box should be a stipulation to Arby's site plan. Steve Simonson advised it would be a good idea. It could be stated that the site plan will not be approved until the private drive easement is complete. This requirement could be given to the inspection department so when the inspection department gets the engineering plan they will make that a requirement back to the owners, that they will not be issued a CFO until the road is complete. Ernie Evans asked if there would be a landscape plan submitted. Steve Simonson advised they do not have much land for landscaping but we are asking for a few trees and grass. Tony Moreno moved to approve the site plan for Arby's Subdivision contingent upon the sign not being more than 75' in height, and the access and utility easement road being completed before opening. Ernie Evans seconded the motion which carried with a unanimous vote. #10 CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION: Reappointment for Two Year Terms of Planning and Zoning Members: 1. Bob Andrews -9- 2. Pia Jarman 3. David Richmond Pia Jarman stated that she had talked with Bob Andrews and also Steve Simonson has also talked with Bob Andrews. Steve Simonson advised he talked with Bob Andrews this afternoon confirming the conversation with Pia Jarman. Even though Bob Andrews is feeling much better and would like to be a part of the Commission, he does not see any time in the near future when he will be able to come back. Should the Good Lord work a miracle he would like to be a part of the Commission again at some future date. He feels in the best interest of the City and the Commission he would like for his seat to be filled by another appointment. Pia Jarman commented it is with great regret that the Commission will accept Bob's wishes. Pia Jarman stated she is willing to serve another two (2) year term if the Commission so wishes. David Richmond stated he is also willing to serve another two (2) year term if the Commission so wishes. Keith Van Dine asked if Bob Andrews resigned and if this will leave an open position? Steve Simonson advised that, yes, Bob Andrews has resigned. For it to be official it needs to be a part of the minutes. Tony Moreno moved to accept the resignation of Bob Andrews and that the Commission fill the position, and that Pia Jarman and David Richmond be reappointed to serve another two (2) year term on the Planning and Zoning Commission. This recommendation will be forwarded to City Council for approval. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion which carried unanimously regarding Bob Andrews' resignation; unanimously in regard to reappointment of members Pia Jarman and David Richmond, with the respective members abstaining from voting for themselves. Merwin Willman asked for recommendation to go on record that Bob Andrews, in the event that his health warrants if he wants to come back to the Commission that he be reappointed on the Commission. Keith Van Dine moved should Bob Andrews health improve at the first available opportunity he be reappointed to the Planning and Zoning Commission. Merwin Willman seconded the motion which carried with a unanimous vote. X11 DISCUSSION: TEXAS APA CONFERENCE: Pia Jarman mentioned that Denise has done a super job and if you only knew how busy she had been last week. Steve had been on vacation so anything to do with Planning and Zoning, she got called upon. The City Manager's secretary had been ill, so Denise was called to help Mr. Sweatt, and one day "I was in there and she was doing traffic tickets among other things." She reminded the Commissioners that they all have tickets and everything that they -10- need. Also the business cards have had the area code and another phone number added by Denise. Pia Jarman commented that on Thursday night of the Conference everyone will get together after all of the formal activities and after dinner. We will get together to discuss future planning with a super aerial map that Steve will be bringing. Steve Simonson stated he had two maps he would be bringing and is hoping to get a conference room and talk about annexation and other issues as it has been about 5 years since a recommendation has been sent to the City Council. In conjunction the engineers are putting a map together of all of western Guadalupe County, Marion back to Schertz, existing area in eastern Bexar County as well as all the area along IH 35, along with the current city limits from Marion, New Braunfels, San Antonio, Cibolo and the City of Schertz. This will give a good full view of what is actually there at this time. On the planning side these are tools needed to make decisions. There will also be an aerial map taken this year in May 1995. This will be a time to sit and relax and have a cup of coffee and have a good discussion. Steve Simonson mentioned to keep all receipts to be able to get reimbursed for food etc. upon returning. Steve Simonson reminded everyone that the APA is having a luncheon on October 6th in Boerne and we will need to know who is going to be able to put in the reservations. Pia Jarman commented that next year the TX APA Conference will be in San Antonio and Steve is on the committee, so make note of anything that could be of some help and to suggest any improvements. #12 GENERAL DISCUSSION: Tonv Moreno• Tony Moreno stated he had no comments. Keith Van Dine: Keith Van Dine due to work related business had to leave before the general discussion. Ernie Evans• Ernie Evans advised he spent a couple of hours on Saturday going through the City on all the new developments and everything is coming along and looking really good. Pia Jarman: Pia Jarman stated she had no comments. -11- Merwin Willman: Merwin Willman asked if the school would be coming in with a plat. Steve Simonson stated yes, they would be coming in with a plat. David Richmond: David Richmond asked if there was any word on HEB. Steve Simonson stated not a word at this time but they put their sign up real fast after is blew down. Councilman Ken Greenwald: Councilman Ken Greenwald advised that the budget for the fiscal year 1995/96 has been passed by the City Council. They will be hiring two new police and fire personnel. The City Council authorized and appointed two alternates for the BOA, Joe Potempa, and Jim Harris. There was an article in the paper about gated communities last Sunday. There was a lot of information on the gated communities with problems being from the Realtors not being honest and up front with the prospective buyers on all of the rules and regulations involved in a gated community. Councilman Greenwald commented that gated communities could work if they have an escrow fund money set aside so that the property owners must maintain a balance of x amount of dollars. Steve Simonson is working on this information for gated communities. Merwin Willman mentioned that gated communities are not really that safe they just give the feeling of safety. The article on the gated communities covers an item that is a concern down the road 5 or 10 years from now when the homeowners association fails and the city has to take over the streets. San Antonio had that happen to them this year. Steve Simonson: Steve Simonson mentioned the reason the article on the gated communities was put in the packets for your information because when there is something stated "private" it is private and they can not force you to take it back. The other side is political pressure. If the city of San Antonio told the citizens that the property is private they could not force the city of San Antonio to take it over and maintain the streets. It is a legal deed. However, this is not how things work politically. This should be done with the developer not the homeowners so when the developers do come for this type of community it has to be done correctly. The article was done by a consultant for San Antonio. We already have the copy that she had prepared for San Antonio. The item that Fulbright and Jaworski is to be researching is what is legal. Just as soon as Steve receives an outline on what should be in the ordinance for gated communities to insure future liability for that subdivision and what we as a city can enforce, it will be available -12- for the Commission's review. When the questions come up about gated communities we do not have to exclude gated communities, but we will have the correct requirements that will have to be followed. This is not to harm the homeowner this has to do with the developer. Anyone that is in a homeowners association area knows that when some place develops the developer runs the homeowners association or they hire a management company and dictates everything for a long time during the development until it is turned over to the homeowners association. The developer has to be informed up front that there will need to be an escrow account to insure the money and so the city will have a legal way to look at it for an audit. One of the things that Steve is pushing for is public safety issues. We have to be able to insure that we can respond in a timely manner in case of an emergency. Steve Simonson gave the following information for the next meeting. Many years ago a church built on Nell Deane, which extended Nell Deane toward FM 1518 and dead ended to an open field. All of the land is zoned General Business (GB). There is a young man that is wanting to buy two (2) acres of land on Nell Deane right behind the existing homes and put in a plumbing store. There is no problem with this as it is zoned GB. He also would like to put his mobile home on this property. He has been informed according to the ordinance he would have to come to request a Specific Use Permit. The road is already built in the area he wants to place the business. The question is not the zoning to operate a business the question is if he will be allowed to put a home on the property. He is also asking to put a mobile home until he builds his house. Steve Simonson mentioned what was in the paper for Cibolo's future master plan. He has an official map for everyone's review. It clearly shows an area for their future master plan which is in our ETJ and water service. The land use plans are something professional planners use that look really nice, but all they are are just brushes they do not tell you anything. What they are telling you is they would like this to happen but they do not tell what kind of residential or business will be in the area. The zoning map the City uses as aggressive as it is, it clearly connotes what you as a Planning and Zoning Commission believes to be the best use for City property within the corporate limits of the city. Unless someone can convince the Commission otherwise it will develop the way it is zoned. Steve Simonson stated that Vestal, Intsel, Alamo Holly, may seem like that is all that is happening but Monotech Steel has come in to add on another building. Steve Simonson advised that Woodland Oaks Units 5 & 6 is coming in to change the name of their subdivision from Woodland Oaks to Woodland Oaks Park. They are aggressively building Unit 5 and are hoping to get started on Unit 6 very quickly. Merwin Willman asked about Unit 10 changing the name. Steve Simonson stated he informed them that they would have to address -13- that issue also at the meeting. $19 ADJOURNMENT: Merwin Willman moved to adjourn the meeting. Tony Moreno seconded the motion, which carried with a unanimous vote. Chairman Pia Jarman adjourned the meeting at 9:00 p.m. The next regularly scheduled meeting is October 10, 1995 at 7:00 p.m. 1 Chairma Planning and Zoning Commission City Schertz, Texas ATTEST: Planning Secretary City of Schertz, Texas -14-