Parks Advisory Board Agenda Packet 07.28.2025
MEETING AGENDA
Schertz Parks and Recreation Advisory Board
REGULAR SESSION
July 28, 2025
CITY COUNCIL CHAMBERS CONFERENCE ROOM
1400 SCHERTZ PKWY BLDG 4
SCHERTZ, TX 78154
CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES
Do the right thing
Do the best you can
Treat others the way you want to be treated
Work cooperatively as a team
AGENDA
MONDAY, JULY 28, 2025 at 5:30 p.m.
Call to Order:
Hearing of Residents
This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Parks Advisory Board. Each person
should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more
than five (5) minutes. Discussion by the Board of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to
statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing
policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding
officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have
signed up to speak in the order they have registered.
All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the Board Secretary no later than noon on the
Monday preceding the meeting. Handouts will be provided to each Board Member prior to the start of
the meeting by the Board Secretary. All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City
property is protected from malware.
Discussion and Action Items
1.Discussion and/or action on FY 25-26 Proposed Civic Center Fee Changes. (L. Shrum/A.
Nolen)
2.Discussion and/or action on the Public Facility License Agreement with the Schertz Youth
Schertz Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Agenda July 28, 2025 Page 1
2.Discussion and/or action on the Public Facility License Agreement with the Schertz Youth
Soccer Alliance (SYSA). (L. Shrum)
3.Discussion and/or action on the Service Agreement with the YMCA of Greater San
Antonio for the Schertz Area Senior Center Management and Operations. (L. Shrum)
Requests and Announcements
Requests by Advisory Board Chairman and Board members for items to be placed on future
agendas.
Announcements by Advisory Board Chairman and members
City and community events attended and to be attended
Recognition of actions by community volunteers
Announcements by City Staff
August 9 | 10 am - 12 pm | Pickrell Park Pool - NEW!! Cardboard Boat Regatta
August 19 | 6:00 pm | City Council FY 25-26 Budget presentations scheduled
September 6 | 9 am - 1 pm | Pickrell Park Large Pavilion - Schertz Hometown Harvest
September 7 | 12 pm & 2 pm | Pickrell Park Pool - Paws in the Pool
September 22 | 5 pm - 8 pm | Parks Tour in place of the next meeting. Vans will
depart from City Council Chambers parking lot.
Board Discussion Calendar
January Regular Business
March Public Facility License Agreements Financial Statement
Review
May Pre-Budget Discussion/Project Feedback
July Parks & Recreation Month
September Regular Business
November Approved FY Budget Review/Project Review
Adjournment
CERTIFICATION
I, SAMANTHA PINELLO, PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD SECRETARY OF
THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS
PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 25th DAY
OF JULY 2025 AT 3:00 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT
ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER
551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.
Samantha Pinello
Schertz Parks & Recreation
Advisory Board Secretary
I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE
Schertz Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Agenda July 28, 2025 Page 2
CONSIDERED BY THE BOARD WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL
BULLETIN BOARD ON _____DAY OF _______________, 2025. TITLE: ______________
This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking
spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services
or other services, please call 210-619-1030.
Schertz Parks and Recreation Advisory Board Agenda July 28, 2025 Page 3
Schertz Soccer Complex
Operations Proposal
History of Public Facility License Agreements
•Small town Schertz, grassroots community-based organizations like BVYA (1974)
•Small staff; no expertise in Recreation or Athletics
•City is growing and becoming more sophisticated in our efforts; standards are increasing
•Added staff capacity in Recreation Division
•Auditing Facility License Agreements
•Identified some issues through that process
Renewed Public Facility License Agreement
with SYSA in 2015
SAYSAT Exits, YMCA Joins
Renovation in 2013
Complex Purchased in 2008
HISTORY
Public Facility License Agreement with SYSA
in 2009
Included SAYSAT, GRAYSA, and Lions FC
Parks Department was just 4 Parks Workers who Mowed
No Recreation Team or Rental Software
CONCERNS
Operations
•Building Maintenance
•Turf Management
•Irrigation Management
Administrative
•Financial Sustainability
•Legal & Compliance Issues
•Best Management Practices
Organization Structure
•Disjointed organization of competitors
•Inequitable Access
THIS IS THE RIGHT
TIME TO ADJUST
Investments to Facility
Enhanced Facility Maintenance and
Oversight
More Equitable Access
Increased Capacity and Programming
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS
City Operations – Neutral Party
•City staff (Athletic Coordinator) manages field utilization
•Competitively bid out field maintenance operations
•Competitively bid out concessionaire operations
•Move to a Recognized Sports Association (RSA) for priority space
•RSA’s coordinate with Athletics Coordinator for field use
•Soccer associations continue to manage their programs
TRANSITION BENEFITS
•Continued investment in the facility to meet resident
standards
•Fair and transparent access for all users
•Additional capacity for City-led recreational
programs and events
•Streamlined operations through technology
•Eliminated duplication- insurance, schedule, website
•Relationship between City and local leagues remains
BUDGET
STAFF
RECOMMENDATIONS
City Operations – Neutral Party
•City staff (Athletic Coordinator) manages field utilization
•Competitively bid out field maintenance operations
•Competitively bid out concessionaire operations
•Move to a Recognized Sports Association (RSA) for priority space
•RSA’s coordinate with Athletics Coordinator for field use
•Soccer associations continue to manage their programs
•Staff proposes a fee structure where everyone pays
FEEDBACK FROM PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
•GRAYSA Proposal to Operate
•Concerns about equity and priority use and how GRAYSA would prioritize field use
•Concerns about contracts with GRAYSA Board members/staff spouses
•Concerns about the ability to maintain the facility to the standards the city is expecting
•Acknowledged that GRAYSA knows soccer; city staff knows maintenance, irrigation, turf management
•Board liked the idea of the city Athletic Coordinator being the neutral party and have the RSA’s coordinate with
Athletics Coordinator for field use
•Soccer associations continue to manage their programs
•Concerns about financial sustainability – GRAYSA wants to phase in paying for utility costs of complex
•Staff proposes a fee structure where everyone pays – we did not get major feedback on this issues and may
need to review again. The consensus of the discussion was the city needs to manage operations and field
utilization.
City Operations – Neutral Party vs GRAYSA proposal to operate
RECOMMENDATION FROM PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD
MOTION TO DISSOLVE SYSA ALLIANCE AND AGREEMENT
5 AYES 1 NAY
MOTION TO RECOMMEND CITY OPERATIONS OF SOCCER
COMPLEX AND HIRE ATHLETIC COORDINATOR PLUS ADDITIONAL
STAFF MEMBERS TO SUPPORT THE ROLE
4 AYES 2 NAY
BENCHMARK CITIES
City Operations is the new standard
•Youth Sports has become a business and is becoming more complicated to manage
•Difficult to manage operations in a volunteer capacity (capital project planning, ADA, permits)
•Most agencies have a tiered system with Rec Leagues having priority, and additional tiers for clubs,
travel, select, etc. Some have a per player fee but also based on tiers of play and resident/non -resident
•Most agencies have concession contracts with a 15% percentage of sales requirement
•All of the following cities maintain their own facilities, manage field utilization through a priority
framework, and have individual field reservation agreements with each association
•College Station
•New Braunfels
•Temple
•San Antonio
•Pflugerville
KEY DIFFERENCES IN ASSOCIATIONS
BVYA
•One organization
•Board does not outsource operational
functions
•Volunteer led Maintenance, Field Supervision,
and Concessions
•Value to the city of $500k in volunteer service
•Fields used primarily by BVYA leagues
•Reinvestments back into the facility
•$100,000 in reserves
•$200,000 in operating funds
•Complex is smaller and more local oriented
•Higher percentage of residents served (46%)
•Multi-sport organization with big picture view
•May not work out in the future
SYSA
•Managed by competing organizations
•Board outsources operational functions
•Contract out Maintenance, Field Supervision,
and Concessions
•Some volunteer in-kind labor for board
members and coaching
•High usage by external leagues and
tournaments
•No reinvestments back into the facility
•$35,000 in operating funds; no reserves
•Complex is larger and more tournament
oriented
•Lower percentage of residents served (24%)
•Single sport focus with narrower view
•One organization with affiliations
•Board outsources operational functions
•Contract out Maintenance, Field Supervision,
and Concessions
•Some volunteer in-kind labor for board
members and coaching
•High usage by external leagues and
tournaments
•Proposed reinvestments back into the facility
•? Operating funds; $200,000 in reserves
•Complex is larger and more tournament
oriented
•Lower percentage of residents served (27%)
•Single sport focus with narrower view
GRAYSA
OPTIONS FORWARD
CONTINUE SYSA OPERATIONS
•City staff invests more time to get alliance into compliance
•Restructure agreement and amend by-laws
•Competitively bid out field maintenance operations
•Competitively bid out concessionaire operations
TRANSITION TO CITY OPERATIONS (staff recommendation)
•City staff (Athletic Coordinator) manages field utilization
•Competitively bid out field maintenance operations
•Competitively bid out concessionaire operations
PUBLISH RFP FOR SOCCER ORGANIZATION TO RUN FACILITY
•Competitive Request for Proposal process to operate facility
•Transparency requirements built into RFP
•Requirements for audit
August
City Council Mtg
Cancel Contract
(min 60 days notice)
2 Tournaments
September
Hire City Athletic
Coordinator
Finalize Fee Structure &
Field Request Deadlines
City starts accepting
tournament agreements
for 2026
October
Publish RFP
Concessions
Addendum to
Mowing Contract
Purchase Field
Striping Robot
November
1 Tournament
City Awards
Concessionaire
Agreement for 2026
City meets w/clubs at
end of Fall Rec season
TIMELINE
December
2 Tournaments
SYSA and contracts
disbanded Dec. 15
Current Contractors
move out equipment
January February
City Operations
Commence
City negotiates
Spring field space
with clubs
Field rehabilitation
2 Tournaments
Spring Season
Starts
COMMENTS & QUESTIONS