Loading...
08-02-2024 Budget Workshop Agenda Packet        BUDGET RETREAT MEETING AGENDA City Council August 2, 2024 8:30 A.M.                                 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team     AGENDA FRIDAY, AUGUST 2, 2024 at 8:30 a.m.        Call to Order  Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Welcome (Mayor Gutierrez/City Manager Steve Williams) August 2, 2024  City Council Agenda                                Page 1  Welcome (Mayor Gutierrez/City Manager Steve Williams)   Discussion and Action Items   1.Review and discussion of the 2024 Employee Engagement Survey (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez/J.Kurz) Budget Prioritization Process 2. Fiscal Year 2024-25 Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program Workshop (S. Williams/Executive Team/James Walters)    Discussion and Action Items 3. Discussion and direction for setting the preliminary maximum tax rate for fiscal year 2025 and setting Public Hearing dates.(S.Williams/J.Walters)    Adjournment CERTIFICATION  I, SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 29TH DAY OF JULY 2024 AT 4:00P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.    SHEILA EDMONDSON    I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON ________DAY OF ___________________, 2024.  TITLE: _______________________________  This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210-619-1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.      August 2, 2024  City Council Agenda                                Page 2        August 2, 2024  City Council Agenda                                Page 3  Agenda No. 1.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:August 02, 2024 Department:City Secretary Subject: Review and discussion of the 2024 Employee Engagement Survey (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez/J.Kurz) Attachments Summary of Employee Engagement Summary  City of Schertz Executive Summary 2024 REPORT ID: 7002 City of Schertz | 2024 Executive Summary Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................1 The Survey ............................................................................................................................2 Employee Engagement ..........................................................................................................3 People ...................................................................................................................................4 Constructs ............................................................................................................................5 Areas of Strength and Concern .......................................................................................6 Climate .................................................................................................................................7 Focus Forward ......................................................................................................................8 Appendix A: Demographic Items .......................................................................................A1 Appendix B: Primary Items ...............................................................................................B1 Appendix C: Additional Items .........................................................................................C1 Appendix D: Engagement Items .........................................................................................D1 Appendix E: Constructs and Related Items ...................................................................E1 Appendix F: Survey Customization Sheet ......................................................................F1 Institute for Organizational Excellence www.survey.utexas.edu UT Austin’s Steve Hicks School of Social Work orgexcel@utexas.edu 405 W 25th Street Phone (512) 471-9831 Austin, Texas 78705 Fax (512) 471-9600 City of Schertz | 2024 Introduction THANK YOU for your participation in the Survey of Employee Engagement (SEE). We trust that you will find this information helpful in your leadership planning and organizational development efforts. The SEE is specifically focused on the key drivers relative to the ability to engage employees towards successfully fulfilling the vision and mission of the organization. Inside this report, you will find many tools to assist you in understanding the engagement of your employees. Your first indication of engagement will be the response rate of your employees. From there, we share with you the overall score for your organization, averaging all survey items. You will also find a breakdown of the levels of engagement found among your employees. We have provided demographic information about the employees surveyed as well as what percent are leaving or retiring in the near future. Then, this report contains a breakdown of the scoring for each construct we surveyed, highlighting areas of strength and areas of concern. Finally, we have provided Focus Forward action items throughout the report and a timeline suggesting how to move forward with what you have learned from the survey results. Your report represents aggregate data, but some organizations will want further information. For example, the SEE makes it possible to see results broken down by demographic groupings. We would enjoy hearing how you've used the data, and what you liked and disliked about the SEE experience. We are here to help you engage your employees in achieving your vision and mission. Noel Landuyt Associate Director Institute for Organizational Excellence Organization Profile City of Schertz Organizational Leadership: Steve Williams, City Manager Benchmark Categories: Size 4: Organizations with 301 to 1000 employees Mission 1/10 : General Government Survey Administration Collection Period: 05/22/2024 through 06/12/2024 Survey Liaison: Jessica Kurz Director of Human Resources and Purchasing 1400 Schertz Parkway, Bldg. 2 Schertz, TX 78154 (210) 619-1152 jkurz@schertz.com 1 City of Schertz | 2024 The Survey 28 Breakout Categories Organizations can use breakout categories to get a cross-sectional look at specific functional or geographic areas. Your organization had a total of 28 breakout categories. 5 Additional Items Organizations can customize their survey with up to 20 additional items. These items can target issues specific to the organization. Your organization added 5 additional items. 2 City of Schertz | 2024 Employee Engagement 49.7% Up 1.6% Response Rate The response rate to the survey is your first indication of the level of employee engagement in your organization. Of the 437 employees invited to take the survey, 217 responded for a response rate of 49.7%. As a general rule, rates higher than 50% suggest soundness, while rates lower than 30% may indicate problems. At 49.7%, your response rate is considered average. Average rates suggest possible issues of trust within the organization, and employees may be reluctant to engage in improvement efforts until leadership demonstrates a clear commitment to change. Overall Score The overall score is a broad indicator for comparison purposes with other entities. Scores above 350 are desirable, and when scores dip below 300, there should be cause for concern. Scores above 400 are the product of a highly engaged workforce. Your Overall Score from last time was 357. Overall Score: 392 29% 32% 30% 9% Levels of Employee Engagement Twelve items crossing several survey constructs have been selected to assess the level of engagement among individual employees. For this organization, 29% of employees are Highly Engaged, 32% are Engaged, 30% are Moderately Engaged, and 9% are Disengaged. Highly Engaged employees are willing to go above and beyond in their employment. Engaged employees are more present in the workplace and show an effort to help out. Moderately Engaged employees are physically present, but put minimal effort towards accomplishing the job. Disengaged employees are disinterested in their jobs and may be actively working against their coworkers. For comparison purposes, according to nationwide polling data, about 30% of employees are Highly Engaged or Engaged, 50% are Moderately Engaged, and 20% are Disengaged. While these numbers may seem intimidating, they offer a starting point for discussions on how to further engage employees. Focus on building trust, encouraging the expression of ideas, and providing employees with the resources, guidance, and training they need to do their best work. 3 City of Schertz | 2024 People Examining demographic data is an important aspect of determining the level of consensus and shared viewpoints across the organization. A diverse workforce helps ensure that different ideas are understood, and that those served see the organization as representative of the community. Gender, race/ethnicity, and age are just a few ways to measure diversity. While percentages can vary among different organizations, extreme imbalances should be a cause for concern. Race/Ethnicity African Am/Black White Asian Native Am, Pac Isl Prefer not to answer Prefer to self- describe 5.1% 76.5% 1.4% 2.3% 13.4% 0.9% 0%25%50%75%100% Age (in years) 16-29 30-39 40-49 50-59 60+ Prefer not to answer 12.4% 21.7% 30.0% 22.6% 5.1% 8.3% 0%25%50%75%100% Gender Female Male Prefer not to answer Prefer to self- describe 35.0% 57.1% 6.5% 0.9% 0%25%50%75%100% YEARS OF SERVICE With this Organization 35% New Hires (0-2 years) 31% Experienced (3-10 years) 26% Very Experienced (11+ years) 9% Prefer not to answer Each figure represents about 2.4 employees. 4%INTEND TO LEAVE Understand why people are leaving your organization by examining retention factors such as working conditions, market competitiveness, or upcoming retirement. 25%CAN RETIRE This percentage of respondents indicated that they are or will be eligible for retirement within two years. 4 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs Similar items are grouped together and their scores are averaged and multiplied by 100 to produce 12 construct measures. These constructs capture the concepts most utilized by leadership and drive organizational performance and engagement. Each construct is displayed below with its corresponding score. Constructs have been coded below to highlight the organization's areas of strength and concern. The three highest are green, the three lowest are red, and all others are yellow. Scores typically range from 300 to 400, and 350 is a tipping point between positive and negative perceptions. The lowest score for a construct is 100, while the highest is 500. Every organization faces different challenges depending on working conditions, resources, and job characteristics. On the next page, we highlight the constructs that are relative strengths and concerns for your organization. While it is important to examine areas of concern, this is also an opportunity to recognize and celebrate areas that employees have judged to be strengths. All organizations start in a different place, and there is always room for improvement within each area. Construct Scores Workgroup Strategic Supervision Workplace Community Information Systems Internal Communication Pay Benefits Employee Development Job Satisfaction Employee Engagement 414 414 403 400 395 388 378 318 396 404 391 406 5 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs Over Time One of the benefits of continuing to participate in the survey is that over time data shows how employees' views have changed as a result of implementing efforts suggested by previous survey results. Positive changes indicate that employees perceive the issue as having improved since the previous survey. Negative changes indicate that the employees perceive that the issue has worsened since the previous survey. Negative changes of greater than 40 points and having 8 or more negative construct changes should be a source of concern for the organization and should be discussed with employees and organizational leadership. Has Change Occurred? Variation in scores from year to year is normal, even when nothing has changed. Analyzing trend data requires a bringing patterns into focus, digging deeper into data, and asking questions about issues surrounding the workplace. Pay close attention to changes of more than 15 points in either direction. Were there any new policies or organizational changes that might have affected the scores? Were these areas a point of focus for your change initiatives? Constructs Scores Over Time Workgroup Strategic Supervision Workplace Community Information Systems Internal Communication Pay Benefits Employee Development Job Satisfaction Employee Engagement 40 34 26 28 17 29 44 86 24 35 40 29 -160 -120 -80 -40 0 40 80 120 160 6 City of Schertz | 2024 Areas of Strength and Concern Areas of Strength Workgroup Score: 414 The workgroup construct captures employees' perceptions of the people they work with on a daily basis and their effectiveness. Higher scores suggest that employees view their workgroup as effective, cohesive and open to the opinions of all members. Strategic Score: 414 The strategic construct captures employees' perceptions of their role in the organization and the organization's mission, vision, and strategic plan. Higher scores suggest that employees understand their role in the organization and consider the organization's reputation to be positive. Employee Engagement Score: 406 The employee engagement construct captures the degree to which employees are willing to go above and beyond, feel committed to the organization and are present while working. Higher scores suggest that employees feel their ideas count, their work impacts the organization and their well-being and development are valued. Areas of Concern Pay Score: 318 The pay construct captures employees' perceptions about how well the compensation package offered by the organization holds up when compared to similar jobs in other organizations. Lower scores suggest that pay is a central concern or reason for discontent and is not comparable to similar organizations. Internal Communication Score: 378 The internal communication construct captures employees' perceptions of whether communication in the organization is reasonable, candid and helpful. Lower scores suggest that employees feel information does not arrive in a timely fashion and is difficult to find. Information Systems Score: 388 The information systems construct captures employees' perceptions of whether computer and communication systems provide accessible, accurate, and clear information. The lower the score, the more likely employees are frustrated with their ability to secure needed information through current systems. 7 City of Schertz | 2024 Climate The climate in which employees work does, to a large extent, determine the efficiency and effectiveness of an organization. The appropriate climate is a combination of a safe, non- harassing environment with ethical abiding employees who treat each other with fairness and respect. Moreover, it is an organization with proactive management that communicates and has the capability to make thoughtful decisions. Below are the percentages of employees who marked disagree or strongly disagree for each of the 6 climate items. 19.9% believe the information from this survey will go unused. Conducting the survey creates momentum and interest in organizational improvement, so it's critical that leadership acts upon the data and keeps employees informed of changes as they occur. 16.7% feel there aren't enough opportunities to give supervisor feedback. Leadership skills should be evaluated and sharpened on a regular basis. Consider implementing 360 Degree Leadership Evaluations so supervisors can get feedback from their boss, peers, and direct reports. 14.8% feel that upper management should communicate better. Upper management should make efforts to be visible and accessible, as well as utilize intranet/internet sites, email, and social media as appropriate to keep employees informed. 7.4% feel they are not treated fairly in the workplace. Favoritism can negatively affect morale and cause resentment among employees. When possible, ensure responsibilities and opportunities are being shared evenly and appropriately. 3.3% feel workplace harassment is not adequately addressed. While no amount of harassment is desirable within an organization, percentages above 5% would benefit from a serious look at workplace culture and the policies for dealing with harassment. 3.2% feel there are issues with ethics in the workplace. An ethical climate is the foundation of building trust within an organization. Reinforce the importance of ethical behavior to employees, and ensure there are appropriate channels to handle ethical violations. 8 City of Schertz | 2024 JUL 2024 SEP 2024 DEC 2024 APR 2026 AUG 2024 OCT 2024 FEB 2025 9 City of Schertz | 2024 Demographic Items Survey respondent information reports the response rate and frequency information for all demographic variables that were asked of participants. Response Rate is a good indicator of employees' willingness to engage in efforts to improve the organization. Scope of Participation is a gauge to see whether or not employees by demographic characteristics participated in the survey. Response Rate Your response rate is the percentage of surveys distributed divided by the number of valid surveys received. For category reports, we only report the response rate for the organization as a whole. What is a good response rate? If your organization sampled employees, the answer must take into consideration size, sampling strategy, variance, and error tolerance. When all employees are surveyed (census), a general rule for organizations of at least 500, is that a 30% rate is a low, but an acceptable level of response. In general, response rates of greater than 50% (regardless of number of employees) indicate a strong level of participation. What about non-respondents? First, you should review the scope of participation discussed in the following paragraph. Second, you need to ascertain whether or not a more focused effort is needed to determine why some groups did not respond. Scope of Participation Respondent information is used as a gauge of the scope of participation. For example, the percentages of male and female respondents should roughly mirror your organization's gender composition. This should be true for the other demographic categories. If not, consider whether or not additional efforts need to be made to engage those low participating categories. It is important to note the following: If less than five respondents selected a demographic variable, "Less Than Five" and "Not Available" is reported to protect the respondents' anonymity. Participants have the option to skip items or select prefer not to answer. Both of these non- responses are combined to give a total "Prefer not to answer" count. A1 City of Schertz | 2024 Demographic Items Total Respondents: 217 Surveys Distributed: 437 Response Rate: 49.66% Number of Survey Respondents Percent of Survey Respondents My highest education level Did not earn high school diploma or equivalent:Less than 5 Not Available High school diploma or equivalent:31 14.29% Some college:75 34.56% Associate's Degree:20 9.22% Bachelor's Degree:47 21.66% Master's Degree:28 12.90% Doctoral Degree:Less than 5 Not Available Prefer not to answer:15 6.91% I am Female :76 35.02% Male :124 57.14% Prefer not to answer :14 6.45% Prefer to self-describe:Less than 5 Not Available My annual salary (before taxes) Less than $20,001 :5 2.30% $20,001 to 30,000 :6 2.76% $30,001 to 40,000 :16 7.37% $40,001 to 50,000 :24 11.06% $50,001 to 60,000 :34 15.67% $60,001 to 70,000 :29 13.36% $70,001 to 80,000 :22 10.14% $80,001 to 90,000 :11 5.07% More than $90,000 :50 23.04% Prefer not to answer:20 9.22% I work Full-time :198 91.24% Part-time :11 5.07% Prefer not to answer:8 3.69% A2 City of Schertz | 2024 Demographic Items Total Respondents: 217 Surveys Distributed: 437 Response Rate: 49.66% Number of Survey Respondents Percent of Survey Respondents My age (in years) 16-29:27 12.44% 30-39:47 21.66% 40-49:65 29.95% 50-59:49 22.58% 60+:11 5.07% Prefer not to answer:18 8.29% Years of service with this organization Less than 1:22 10.14% 1-2:53 24.42% 3-5:31 14.29% 6-10:36 16.59% 11-15:23 10.60% 16+:33 15.21% Prefer not to answer:19 8.76% Are you of Hispanic, Latino/a/x, or of Spanish origin? Yes:63 29.03% No:127 58.53% Prefer not to answer:27 12.44% My race/ethnic identification (Check all that apply) African American or Black:11 5.07% White:166 76.50% Asian:Less than 5 Not Available Native American or Pacific Islander:5 2.30% Prefer not to answer:29 13.36% Prefer to self-describe:Less than 5 Not Available I am currently in a supervisory role. Yes:77 35.48% No:120 55.30% Prefer not to answer:20 9.22% A3 City of Schertz | 2024 Demographic Items Total Respondents: 217 Surveys Distributed: 437 Response Rate: 49.66% Number of Survey Respondents Percent of Survey Respondents I received a promotion during the past two years. Yes:47 21.66% No:151 69.59% Prefer not to answer:19 8.76% I received a merit increase during the past two years. Yes:79 36.41% No:114 52.53% Prefer not to answer:24 11.06% I plan to be working for this organization in one year. Yes:186 85.71% No:8 3.69% Prefer not to answer:23 10.60% I am eligible for retirement within the next two years. Yes:54 24.88% No:146 67.28% Prefer not to answer:17 7.83% I currently remote work... None of the time :202 93.09% Some (1 - 2 days per week) :Less than 5 Not Available Most (3 - 4 days per week) :Less than 5 Not Available All the time :Less than 5 Not Available Prefer not to answer:12 5.53% A4 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items For the primary items (numbered 1-48), participants were asked to indicate how they agreed with each positively phrased statement. If participants did not have information or the item did not apply, they were to select don't know/not applicable. Each primary item is returned with the item text and two types of reported numerical data, response data and benchmark data. The following definitions correspond to survey items: Response Data Score is calculated by averaging all item responses on a five point scale ranging from 5=Strongly Agree to 1=Strongly Disagree. If the participant selected Don't Know/Not Applicable, their response is considered a valid response, but it is not used in the calculation of the score. Standard Deviation calculates the level of agreement. Large deviations indicate greater levels of disagreement. For this report, you can expect standard deviations to be between .7 and 1.10. Total Respondents is the number of valid responses including Don't Know/Not Applicable. If everyone did not answer every item, the number of respondents for an item is less than the number of respondents reported in your response rate. Respondents is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.). Percentage is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.) divided by the total number of valid responses. Percent Agreement is the number of participants who agreed with the item (strongly agree or agree) divided by the total number of valid responses. Benchmark Data Past Score is your organization's score reported from the previous iteration, if available. Similar Mission is the average score from organizations that share a similar mission to your organization. Similar Size is the average score from organizations that are a similar size to your organization. All Organizations is the average score from all organizations. Organizational Categories are benchmarked against the organization as a whole. Interpreting Data Any interpretation of data must be done in context of the organizational setting and environmental factors impacting the organization. Regardless of the averages, scores range from areas of strength to areas of concern. In general, most scores are between 3.00 and 4.00. Scores below a 3.25 are of concern because they indicate general dissatisfaction. Scores above 3.75 indicate positive perceptions. When available, over time data provides previous scores from and benchmark data comparative scores. In general (because various factors and statistical test would be needed to confirm), scores that have changed or differ by .2 may be significant. B1 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 1. My work group cooperates to get the job done. 87% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:91 97 19 8 1 0 Percentage:42.13%44.91%8.80%3.70%0.46%0.00% 87% Agreement SCORE:4.25 Std. Dev.:0.80 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:4.14 Similar Mission:4.43 Similar Size:4.33 All Orgs:4.38 2. In my work group I can share my opinions and ideas. 83% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:89 89 22 9 6 0 Percentage:41.40%41.40%10.23%4.19%2.79%0.00% 83% Agreement SCORE:4.14 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.77 Similar Mission:4.26 Similar Size:4.14 All Orgs:4.20 3. In my workgroup, we encourage each other to learn from our mistakes. 83% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:85 94 26 9 1 1 Percentage:39.35%43.52%12.04%4.17%0.46%0.46% 83% Agreement SCORE:4.18 Std. Dev.:0.84 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.35 Similar Mission:3.67 Similar Size:3.65 All Orgs:3.73 4. In my work group, there is a real feeling of teamwork. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:77 83 36 16 4 0 Percentage:35.65%38.43%16.67%7.41%1.85%0.00% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.99 Std. Dev.:1.00 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.69 Similar Mission:4.14 Similar Size:4.02 All Orgs:4.09 B2 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 5. Our organization is known for the quality of work we provide. 85% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:72 111 23 8 2 0 Percentage:33.33%51.39%10.65%3.70%0.93%0.00% 85% Agreement SCORE:4.13 Std. Dev.:0.81 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.83 Similar Mission:4.26 Similar Size:4.02 All Orgs:4.10 6. I know how my work impacts others in the organization. 91% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:106 91 14 5 0 0 Percentage:49.07%42.13%6.48%2.31%0.00%0.00% 91% Agreement SCORE:4.38 Std. Dev.:0.71 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:4.09 Similar Mission:4.46 Similar Size:4.27 All Orgs:4.36 7. My organization develops services to match the needs of our customers/clients. 81% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:73 103 32 6 1 1 Percentage:33.80%47.69%14.81%2.78%0.46%0.46% 81% Agreement SCORE:4.12 Std. Dev.:0.79 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.67 Similar Mission:4.22 Similar Size:4.03 All Orgs:4.08 8. Our organization communicates effectively with the public. 75% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:52 111 38 12 2 1 Percentage:24.07%51.39%17.59%5.56%0.93%0.46% 75% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:0.85 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.57 Similar Mission:4.05 Similar Size:3.76 All Orgs:3.90 B3 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 9. I have a good understanding of our mission, vision, and strategic plan. 85% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:75 108 21 9 3 0 Percentage:34.72%50.00%9.72%4.17%1.39%0.00% 85% Agreement SCORE:4.13 Std. Dev.:0.85 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.86 Similar Mission:4.37 Similar Size:4.19 All Orgs:4.30 10. My supervisor provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities. 80% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:84 89 26 15 2 0 Percentage:38.89%41.20%12.04%6.94%0.93%0.00% 80% Agreement SCORE:4.10 Std. Dev.:0.93 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.95 Similar Mission:4.27 Similar Size:4.21 All Orgs:4.27 11. My supervisor recognizes outstanding work. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:76 83 33 16 8 0 Percentage:35.19%38.43%15.28%7.41%3.70%0.00% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.94 Std. Dev.:1.07 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.63 Similar Mission:4.25 Similar Size:4.09 All Orgs:4.17 12. I am given the opportunity to do my best work. 86% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:87 98 23 5 2 0 Percentage:40.47%45.58%10.70%2.33%0.93%0.00% 86% Agreement SCORE:4.22 Std. Dev.:0.80 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.82 Similar Mission:4.23 Similar Size:4.12 All Orgs:4.20 B4 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 13. My supervisor is consistent when administering policies concerning employees. 72% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:63 92 31 23 6 1 Percentage:29.17%42.59%14.35%10.65%2.78%0.46% 72% Agreement SCORE:3.85 Std. Dev.:1.05 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.62 Similar Mission:4.09 Similar Size:4.01 All Orgs:4.08 14. My supervisor evaluates my performance fairly. 77% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:76 91 32 5 8 4 Percentage:35.19%42.13%14.81%2.31%3.70%1.85% 77% Agreement SCORE:4.05 Std. Dev.:0.97 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.81 Similar Mission:4.23 Similar Size:4.15 All Orgs:4.21 15. Given the type of work I do, my physical workplace meets my needs. 81% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:75 100 21 14 6 0 Percentage:34.72%46.30%9.72%6.48%2.78%0.00% 81% Agreement SCORE:4.04 Std. Dev.:0.98 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.78 Similar Mission:4.29 Similar Size:4.16 All Orgs:4.24 16. My workplace is well maintained. 72% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:52 102 38 16 6 1 Percentage:24.19%47.44%17.67%7.44%2.79%0.47% 72% Agreement SCORE:3.83 Std. Dev.:0.97 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.54 Similar Mission:4.14 Similar Size:4.09 All Orgs:4.09 B5 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 17. There are sufficient procedures to ensure the safety of employees in the workplace. 88% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:60 130 19 6 1 0 Percentage:27.78%60.19%8.80%2.78%0.46%0.00% 88% Agreement SCORE:4.12 Std. Dev.:0.71 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.89 Similar Mission:4.18 Similar Size:4.11 All Orgs:4.12 18. I have adequate resources and equipment to do my job. 82% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 122 28 8 3 0 Percentage:25.12%56.74%13.02%3.72%1.40%0.00% 82% Agreement SCORE:4.00 Std. Dev.:0.81 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.68 Similar Mission:4.18 Similar Size:3.99 All Orgs:4.08 19. The people I work with treat each other with respect. 73% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:61 97 45 6 6 1 Percentage:28.24%44.91%20.83%2.78%2.78%0.46% 73% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:0.93 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.77 Similar Mission:4.20 Similar Size:4.14 All Orgs:4.17 20. The people I work with come from diverse backgrounds. 82% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:59 118 32 4 1 2 Percentage:27.31%54.63%14.81%1.85%0.46%0.93% 82% Agreement SCORE:4.07 Std. Dev.:0.73 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.97 Similar Mission:4.14 Similar Size:4.16 All Orgs:4.16 B6 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 21. The people I work with care about my personal well-being. 79% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:68 103 30 10 5 0 Percentage:31.48%47.69%13.89%4.63%2.31%0.00% 79% Agreement SCORE:4.01 Std. Dev.:0.92 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.80 Similar Mission:4.16 Similar Size:4.04 All Orgs:4.09 22. I trust the people in my workplace. 65% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 85 55 15 4 2 Percentage:25.12%39.53%25.58%6.98%1.86%0.93% 65% Agreement SCORE:3.80 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.58 Similar Mission:4.04 Similar Size:3.90 All Orgs:3.96 23. My work group uses the latest technologies to communicate and interact. 66% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:34 109 47 21 4 1 Percentage:15.74%50.46%21.76%9.72%1.85%0.46% 66% Agreement SCORE:3.69 Std. Dev.:0.92 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.34 Similar Mission:3.93 Similar Size:3.88 All Orgs:3.90 24. We receive regular and useful updates on how to keep our computer and sensitive information secure from cyber-attack. 90% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:68 127 15 4 1 1 Percentage:31.48%58.80%6.94%1.85%0.46%0.46% 90% Agreement SCORE:4.20 Std. Dev.:0.68 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:4.09 Similar Mission:4.30 Similar Size:4.29 All Orgs:4.27 B7 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 25. Support is available for the technologies we use. 77% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:51 114 36 10 3 1 Percentage:23.72%53.02%16.74%4.65%1.40%0.47% 77% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:0.85 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.61 Similar Mission:4.16 Similar Size:4.05 All Orgs:4.13 26. Our computer systems enable me to quickly find the information I need. 69% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:37 111 34 26 6 2 Percentage:17.13%51.39%15.74%12.04%2.78%0.93% 69% Agreement SCORE:3.69 Std. Dev.:0.99 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.33 Similar Mission:4.02 Similar Size:3.84 All Orgs:3.92 27. The communication channels I must go through at work are reasonable. 75% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:46 115 34 16 5 0 Percentage:21.30%53.24%15.74%7.41%2.31%0.00% 75% Agreement SCORE:3.84 Std. Dev.:0.92 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.47 Similar Mission:4.02 Similar Size:3.84 All Orgs:3.97 28. My work atmosphere encourages open and honest communication. 73% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 103 39 12 8 0 Percentage:25.00%47.69%18.06%5.56%3.70%0.00% 73% Agreement SCORE:3.85 Std. Dev.:0.98 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.24 Similar Mission:3.90 Similar Size:3.79 All Orgs:3.86 B8 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 29. The communications I receive at work are timely and informative. 67% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:40 105 37 26 8 0 Percentage:18.52%48.61%17.13%12.04%3.70%0.00% 67% Agreement SCORE:3.66 Std. Dev.:1.03 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.32 Similar Mission:3.97 Similar Size:3.79 All Orgs:3.91 30. My pay keeps pace with the cost of living. 35% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:19 56 67 40 33 0 Percentage:8.84%26.05%31.16%18.60%15.35%0.00% 35% Agreement SCORE:2.94 Std. Dev.:1.19 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:2.02 Similar Mission:2.46 Similar Size:2.35 All Orgs:2.46 31. Salaries are competitive with similar jobs in the community. 46% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:28 71 57 38 15 6 Percentage:13.02%33.02%26.51%17.67%6.98%2.79% 46% Agreement SCORE:3.28 Std. Dev.:1.13 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:2.36 Similar Mission:2.61 Similar Size:2.52 All Orgs:2.64 32. I feel I am paid fairly for the work I do. 50% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:31 76 54 36 17 0 Percentage:14.49%35.51%25.23%16.82%7.94%0.00% 50% Agreement SCORE:3.32 Std. Dev.:1.15 Total Respondents:214 BENCHMARKS Past Score:2.57 Similar Mission:2.93 Similar Size:2.77 All Orgs:2.89 B9 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 33. Retirement benefits are competitive with similar jobs in the community. 77% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:53 111 34 11 0 5 Percentage:24.77%51.87%15.89%5.14%0.00%2.34% 77% Agreement SCORE:3.99 Std. Dev.:0.79 Total Respondents:214 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.74 Similar Mission:3.96 Similar Size:3.74 All Orgs:3.83 34. Health insurance benefits are competitive with similar jobs in the community. 76% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 110 30 9 4 8 Percentage:25.12%51.16%13.95%4.19%1.86%3.72% 76% Agreement SCORE:3.97 Std. Dev.:0.87 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.62 Similar Mission:4.11 Similar Size:4.00 All Orgs:4.01 35. Benefits can be selected to meet individual needs. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:52 108 34 13 2 6 Percentage:24.19%50.23%15.81%6.05%0.93%2.79% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:0.86 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.80 Similar Mission:4.00 Similar Size:3.90 All Orgs:3.94 36. I believe I have a career with this organization. 81% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:85 90 32 5 3 1 Percentage:39.35%41.67%14.81%2.31%1.39%0.46% 81% Agreement SCORE:4.16 Std. Dev.:0.86 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.86 Similar Mission:3.97 Similar Size:3.92 All Orgs:3.97 B10 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 37. Training is made available to me so that I can do my job better. 80% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:73 100 25 12 5 0 Percentage:33.95%46.51%11.63%5.58%2.33%0.00% 80% Agreement SCORE:4.04 Std. Dev.:0.94 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.71 Similar Mission:3.96 Similar Size:3.91 All Orgs:3.90 38. Training is made available to me for personal growth and development. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:71 89 33 14 8 0 Percentage:33.02%41.40%15.35%6.51%3.72%0.00% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:1.04 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.51 Similar Mission:3.92 Similar Size:3.82 All Orgs:3.81 39. My work environment supports a balance between work and personal life. 71% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:64 89 34 18 11 0 Percentage:29.63%41.20%15.74%8.33%5.09%0.00% 71% Agreement SCORE:3.82 Std. Dev.:1.10 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.31 Similar Mission:4.04 Similar Size:3.79 All Orgs:3.91 40. I feel free to be myself at work. 75% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:60 102 29 15 10 0 Percentage:27.78%47.22%13.43%6.94%4.63%0.00% 75% Agreement SCORE:3.87 Std. Dev.:1.05 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.55 Similar Mission:4.02 Similar Size:3.86 All Orgs:3.94 B11 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 41. The pace of work enables employees to effectively perform their job. 67% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:32 113 49 18 3 1 Percentage:14.81%52.31%22.69%8.33%1.39%0.46% 67% Agreement SCORE:3.71 Std. Dev.:0.87 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.28 Similar Mission:3.81 Similar Size:3.64 All Orgs:3.71 42. I am proud to tell people that I work for this organization. 84% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:85 97 32 2 0 0 Percentage:39.35%44.91%14.81%0.93%0.00%0.00% 84% Agreement SCORE:4.23 Std. Dev.:0.73 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.89 Similar Mission:4.27 Similar Size:4.14 All Orgs:4.17 43. Harassment is not tolerated at my workplace. 87% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:85 102 21 5 2 0 Percentage:39.53%47.44%9.77%2.33%0.93%0.00% 87% Agreement SCORE:4.22 Std. Dev.:0.79 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.91 Similar Mission:4.33 Similar Size:4.25 All Orgs:4.30 44. Employees are generally ethical in my workplace. 84% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:58 124 27 7 0 0 Percentage:26.85%57.41%12.50%3.24%0.00%0.00% 84% Agreement SCORE:4.08 Std. Dev.:0.72 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.93 Similar Mission:4.34 Similar Size:4.19 All Orgs:4.24 B12 City of Schertz | 2024 Primary Items 45. I believe we will use the information from this survey to improve our workplace. 50% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:34 75 63 26 17 1 Percentage:15.74%34.72%29.17%12.04%7.87%0.46% 50% Agreement SCORE:3.39 Std. Dev.:1.13 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.06 Similar Mission:3.68 Similar Size:3.51 All Orgs:3.60 46. I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to give feedback on my supervisor's performance. 65% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:41 100 35 21 15 4 Percentage:18.98%46.30%16.20%9.72%6.94%1.85% 65% Agreement SCORE:3.62 Std. Dev.:1.12 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.29 Similar Mission:3.78 Similar Size:3.63 All Orgs:3.76 47. Upper management (i.e. Executive and/or Senior Leadership) effectively communicates important information. 63% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:41 94 48 19 13 1 Percentage:18.98%43.52%22.22%8.80%6.02%0.46% 63% Agreement SCORE:3.61 Std. Dev.:1.08 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.13 Similar Mission:3.91 Similar Size:3.66 All Orgs:3.83 48. I am treated fairly in my workplace. 79% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:61 109 29 14 2 0 Percentage:28.37%50.70%13.49%6.51%0.93%0.00% 79% Agreement SCORE:3.99 Std. Dev.:0.88 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.78 Similar Mission:4.16 Similar Size:4.01 All Orgs:4.08 B13 City of Schertz | 2024 Additional Items Organizations participating in the Survey are invited to submit up to 20 additional items for inclusion in the Survey. These items are included at the end of the online survey or are printed on an insert and included in each employee's survey packet. Please refer to the survey customization sheet that has been included later in this report for more information on additional items submitted by this organization. *Additional Items are not included if none were submitted. Each additional item is returned with the item text and two types of reported numerical data, response data and benchmark data. The following definitions correspond to additional items: Response Data Score is calculated by averaging all item responses on a five point scale ranging from 5=Strongly Agree to 1=Strongly Disagree. If the participant selected Don't Know/Not Applicable, their response is considered a valid response, but it is not used in the calculation of the score. Standard Deviation calculates the level of agreement. Large deviations indicate greater levels of disagreement. For this report, you can expect standard deviations to be between .7 and 1.10. Total Respondents is the number of valid responses including Don't Know/Not Applicable. If everyone did not answer every item, the number of respondents for an item is less than the number of respondents reported in your response rate. Respondents is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.). Percentage is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.) divided by the total number of valid responses. Percent Agreement is the number of participants who agreed with the item (strongly agree or agree) divided by the total number of valid responses. Benchmark Data Benchmark and over time data are not available for Additional Items. Interpreting Data Any interpretation of data must be done in context of the organizational setting and environmental factors impacting the organization. Regardless of the averages, scores range from areas of strength to areas of concern. In general, most scores are between 3.00 and 4.00. Scores below a 3.25 are of concern because they indicate general dissatisfaction. Scores above 3.75 indicate positive perceptions. When available, over time data provides previous scores from and benchmark data comparative scores. In general (because various factors and statistical test would be needed to confirm), scores that have changed or differ by .2 may be significant. C1 City of Schertz | 2024 Additional Items 1. My Executive Leadership Team (Dept. Head and City Mgmt.) provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities. 71% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:52 101 40 16 5 2 Percentage:24.07%46.76%18.52%7.41%2.31%0.93% 71% Agreement SCORE:3.84 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:216 2. My Executive Leadership Team recognizes outstanding work. 67% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:55 88 41 19 10 2 Percentage:25.58%40.93%19.07%8.84%4.65%0.93% 67% Agreement SCORE:3.75 Std. Dev.:1.08 Total Respondents:215 3. My Executive Leadership Team is consistent when administering policies concerning employees. 68% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:42 104 36 21 7 5 Percentage:19.53%48.37%16.74%9.77%3.26%2.33% 68% Agreement SCORE:3.73 Std. Dev.:1.00 Total Respondents:215 4. My Executive Leadership Team evaluates my performance fairly. 66% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:45 96 41 16 5 11 Percentage:21.03%44.86%19.16%7.48%2.34%5.14% 66% Agreement SCORE:3.79 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:214 C2 City of Schertz | 2024 Additional Items 5. I feel that City and/or Department policies are adequate. 71% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:45 107 48 8 5 2 Percentage:20.93%49.77%22.33%3.72%2.33%0.93% 71% Agreement SCORE:3.84 Std. Dev.:0.88 Total Respondents:215 C3 City of Schertz | 2024 Engagement Items Employee Engagement items span several constructs, and capture the degree to which employees are willing to go above and beyond, feel committed to the organization and are present while working. This construct measures the degree to which employees feel that their ideas count, their work impacts the organization and their well being and development is valued. Each engagement item is returned with the item text and two types of reported numerical data, response data and benchmark data. The following definitions correspond to survey items: Response Data Score is calculated by averaging all item responses on a five point scale ranging from 5=Strongly Agree to 1=Strongly Disagree. If the participant selected Don't Know/Not Applicable, their response is considered a valid response, but it is not used in the calculation of the score. Standard Deviation calculates the level of agreement. Large deviations indicate greater levels of disagreement. For this report, you can expect standard deviations to be between .7 and 1.10. Total Respondents is the number of valid responses including Don't Know/Not Applicable. If everyone did not answer every item, the number of respondents for an item is less than the number of respondents reported in your response rate. Respondents is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.). Percentage is the number of participants who selected each item (strongly agree, agree, etc.) divided by the total number of valid responses. Percent Agreement is the number of participants who agreed with the item (strongly agree or agree) divided by the total number of valid responses. Benchmark Data Past Score is your organization's score reported from the previous iteration, if available. Similar Mission is the average score from organizations that share a similar mission to your organization. Similar Size is the average score from organizations that are a similar size to your organization. All Organizations is the average score from all organizations. Interpreting Data Any interpretation of data must be done in context of the organizational setting and environmental factors impacting the organization. Regardless of the averages, scores range from areas of strength to areas of concern. In general, most scores are between 3.00 and 4.00. Scores below a 3.25 are of concern because they indicate general dissatisfaction. Scores above 3.75 indicate positive perceptions. When available, over time data provides previous scores from and benchmark data comparative scores. In general (because various factors and statistical test would be needed to confirm), scores that have changed or differ by .2 may be significant. D1 City of Schertz | 2024 Engagement Items 2. In my work group I can share my opinions and ideas. 83% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:89 89 22 9 6 0 Percentage:41.40%41.40%10.23%4.19%2.79%0.00% 83% Agreement SCORE:4.14 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.77 Similar Mission:4.26 Similar Size:4.14 All Orgs:4.20 5. Our organization is known for the quality of work we provide. 85% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:72 111 23 8 2 0 Percentage:33.33%51.39%10.65%3.70%0.93%0.00% 85% Agreement SCORE:4.13 Std. Dev.:0.81 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.83 Similar Mission:4.26 Similar Size:4.02 All Orgs:4.10 6. I know how my work impacts others in the organization. 91% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:106 91 14 5 0 0 Percentage:49.07%42.13%6.48%2.31%0.00%0.00% 91% Agreement SCORE:4.38 Std. Dev.:0.71 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:4.09 Similar Mission:4.46 Similar Size:4.27 All Orgs:4.36 10. My supervisor provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities. 80% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:84 89 26 15 2 0 Percentage:38.89%41.20%12.04%6.94%0.93%0.00% 80% Agreement SCORE:4.10 Std. Dev.:0.93 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.95 Similar Mission:4.27 Similar Size:4.21 All Orgs:4.27 D2 City of Schertz | 2024 Engagement Items 11. My supervisor recognizes outstanding work. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:76 83 33 16 8 0 Percentage:35.19%38.43%15.28%7.41%3.70%0.00% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.94 Std. Dev.:1.07 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.63 Similar Mission:4.25 Similar Size:4.09 All Orgs:4.17 12. I am given the opportunity to do my best work. 86% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:87 98 23 5 2 0 Percentage:40.47%45.58%10.70%2.33%0.93%0.00% 86% Agreement SCORE:4.22 Std. Dev.:0.80 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.82 Similar Mission:4.23 Similar Size:4.12 All Orgs:4.20 14. My supervisor evaluates my performance fairly. 77% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:76 91 32 5 8 4 Percentage:35.19%42.13%14.81%2.31%3.70%1.85% 77% Agreement SCORE:4.05 Std. Dev.:0.97 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.81 Similar Mission:4.23 Similar Size:4.15 All Orgs:4.21 18. I have adequate resources and equipment to do my job. 82% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 122 28 8 3 0 Percentage:25.12%56.74%13.02%3.72%1.40%0.00% 82% Agreement SCORE:4.00 Std. Dev.:0.81 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.68 Similar Mission:4.18 Similar Size:3.99 All Orgs:4.08 D3 City of Schertz | 2024 Engagement Items 21. The people I work with care about my personal well-being. 79% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:68 103 30 10 5 0 Percentage:31.48%47.69%13.89%4.63%2.31%0.00% 79% Agreement SCORE:4.01 Std. Dev.:0.92 Total Respondents:216 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.80 Similar Mission:4.16 Similar Size:4.04 All Orgs:4.09 22. I trust the people in my workplace. 65% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:54 85 55 15 4 2 Percentage:25.12%39.53%25.58%6.98%1.86%0.93% 65% Agreement SCORE:3.80 Std. Dev.:0.96 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.58 Similar Mission:4.04 Similar Size:3.90 All Orgs:3.96 37. Training is made available to me so that I can do my job better. 80% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:73 100 25 12 5 0 Percentage:33.95%46.51%11.63%5.58%2.33%0.00% 80% Agreement SCORE:4.04 Std. Dev.:0.94 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.71 Similar Mission:3.96 Similar Size:3.91 All Orgs:3.90 38. Training is made available to me for personal growth and development. 74% Agreement Response: Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree Don't Know/NA Respondents:71 89 33 14 8 0 Percentage:33.02%41.40%15.35%6.51%3.72%0.00% 74% Agreement SCORE:3.93 Std. Dev.:1.04 Total Respondents:215 BENCHMARKS Past Score:3.51 Similar Mission:3.92 Similar Size:3.82 All Orgs:3.81 D4 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs and Related Items The Survey of Employee Engagement framework is composed of twelve Survey Constructs designed to broadly profile areas of strength and concern so that interventions may be targeted appropriately. Survey Constructs are developed from the Primary Items (numbered 1-48). This Appendix contains a summary of the Survey Constructs and the related Primary Items. Constructs are scored differently from items to denote them as a separate measure. Using this scoring convention, construct scores can range from a low of 100 to a high of 500. Your Data Current Score is calculated by averaging the mean score of the related primary items and then multiplying by 100. For example if the construct score is 389, then the average of the related primary items is 3.89. Benchmark Data Past Score is your organization's score reported from the previous iteration. "None" is reported if there is no past score, if the construct is new or consists of new items, or if no comparative data is available. All Respondents is the average score from all participants from all organizations. Size Category is the average score from organizations that are similar size to your organization. Mission is the average score from organizations of similar mission to your organization. Organizational Categories are benchmarked against the organization as a whole. What is a good score? Any interpretation of data must be done in context of the organizational setting and environmental factors impacting the organization. In general, most scores are between 300 and 400. Scores below a 325 are of concern because they indicate general dissatisfaction. Scores above 375 indicate positive perceptions. E1 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs and Related Items Workgroup Construct Score: 414 The workgroup construct captures employees' perceptions of the people they work with on a daily basis and how effective they are. This construct measures the degree to which employees view their workgroup as effective, cohesive and open to the opinions of all members. Score Std. Dev. 1. My work group cooperates to get the job done.4.25 0.80 2. In my work group I can share my opinions and ideas.4.14 0.96 3. In my workgroup, we encourage each other to learn from our mistakes.4.18 0.84 4. In my work group, there is a real feeling of teamwork.3.99 1.00 Strategic Construct Score: 414 The strategic construct captures employees' perceptions of their role in the organization and the organization's mission, vision, and strategic plan. This construct measures the degree to which employees understand their role in the organization and consider the organization's reputation to be positive. Score Std. Dev. 5. Our organization is known for the quality of work we provide.4.13 0.81 6. I know how my work impacts others in the organization.4.38 0.71 7. My organization develops services to match the needs of our customers/clients.4.12 0.79 8. Our organization communicates effectively with the public.3.93 0.85 9. I have a good understanding of our mission, vision, and strategic plan.4.13 0.85 Supervision Construct Score: 403 The supervision construct captures employees' perceptions of the nature of supervisory relationships within the organization. This construct measures the degree to which employees view their supervisors as fair, helpful and critical to the workflow. Score Std. Dev. 10. My supervisor provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities.4.10 0.93 11. My supervisor recognizes outstanding work.3.94 1.07 12. I am given the opportunity to do my best work.4.22 0.80 13. My supervisor is consistent when administering policies concerning employees.3.85 1.05 14. My supervisor evaluates my performance fairly.4.05 0.97 Workplace Construct Score: 400 The workplace construct captures employees' perceptions of the total work atmosphere, workplace safety, and the overall feel. This construct measures the degree to which employees see the setting as satisfactory, safe and that adequate tools and resources are available. Score Std. Dev. 15. Given the type of work I do, my physical workplace meets my needs.4.04 0.98 16. My workplace is well maintained.3.83 0.97 17. There are sufficient procedures to ensure the safety of employees in the workplace.4.12 0.71 18. I have adequate resources and equipment to do my job.4.00 0.81 E2 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs and Related Items Community Construct Score: 395 The community construct captures employees' perceptions of the relationships between employees in the workplace, including trust, respect, care, and diversity among colleagues. This construct measures the degree to which employees feel respected, cared for, and have established trust with their colleagues. Score Std. Dev. 19. The people I work with treat each other with respect.3.93 0.93 20. The people I work with come from diverse backgrounds.4.07 0.73 21. The people I work with care about my personal well-being.4.01 0.92 22. I trust the people in my workplace.3.80 0.96 Information Systems Construct Score: 388 The information systems construct captures employees' perceptions of whether computer and communication systems provide accessible, accurate, and clear information. This construct measures the degree to which employees view the availability and utility of information positively. Score Std. Dev. 23. My work group uses the latest technologies to communicate and interact.3.69 0.92 24. We receive regular and useful updates on how to keep our computer and sensitive information secure from cyber-attack.4.20 0.68 25. Support is available for the technologies we use.3.93 0.85 26. Our computer systems enable me to quickly find the information I need.3.69 0.99 Internal Communication Construct Score: 378 The internal communication construct captures employees' perceptions of whether communication in the organization is reasonable, candid and helpful. This construct measures the degree to which employees view communication with peers, supervisors and other parts of the organization as functional and effective. Score Std. Dev. 27. The communication channels I must go through at work are reasonable.3.84 0.92 28. My work atmosphere encourages open and honest communication.3.85 0.98 29. The communications I receive at work are timely and informative.3.66 1.03 Pay Construct Score: 318 The pay construct captures employees' perceptions of how well the compensation package offered by the organization holds up when compared to similar jobs in other organizations. This construct measures the degree to which employees view pay as well valued relative to the type of work, work demands and comparable positions. Score Std. Dev. 30. My pay keeps pace with the cost of living.2.94 1.19 31. Salaries are competitive with similar jobs in the community.3.28 1.13 32. I feel I am paid fairly for the work I do.3.32 1.15 E3 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs and Related Items Benefits Construct Score: 396 The benefits construct captures employees' perceptions of how the benefits package compares to packages at similar organizations and how flexible it is. This construct measures the degree to which employees see health insurance and retirement benefits as competitive with similar jobs in the community. Score Std. Dev. 33. Retirement benefits are competitive with similar jobs in the community.3.99 0.79 34. Health insurance benefits are competitive with similar jobs in the community.3.97 0.87 35. Benefits can be selected to meet individual needs.3.93 0.86 Employee Development Construct Score: 404 The employee development construct captures employees' perceptions about the priority given to their personal and job growth needs. This construct measures the degree to which employees feel the organization provides opportunities for growth in organizational responsibilities and personal needs in their careers. Score Std. Dev. 36. I believe I have a career with this organization.4.16 0.86 37. Training is made available to me so that I can do my job better.4.04 0.94 38. Training is made available to me for personal growth and development.3.93 1.04 Job Satisfaction Construct Score: 391 The job satisfaction construct captures employees' perceptions about the overall work situation and ability to maintain work-life balance. This construct measures the degree to which employees are pleased with working conditions and their workload. Score Std. Dev. 39. My work environment supports a balance between work and personal life.3.82 1.10 40. I feel free to be myself at work.3.87 1.05 41. The pace of work enables employees to effectively perform their job.3.71 0.87 42. I am proud to tell people that I work for this organization.4.23 0.73 Climate While not scored as a construct, the following six items assess the climate in which employees work. The appropriate climate is a combination of a safe, non-harassing environment with ethical abiding employees who treat each other with fairness and respect. Moreover, it is an organization with proactive management that communicates and has the capability to make thoughtful decisions. Score Std. Dev. 43. Harassment is not tolerated at my workplace.4.22 0.79 44. Employees are generally ethical in my workplace.4.08 0.72 45. I believe we will use the information from this survey to improve our workplace.3.39 1.13 46. I am satisfied with the opportunities I have to give feedback on my supervisor's performance.3.62 1.12 47. Upper management (i.e. Executive and/or Senior Leadership) effectively communicates important information.3.61 1.08 48. I am treated fairly in my workplace.3.99 0.88 E4 City of Schertz | 2024 Constructs and Related Items Employee Engagement Construct Score: 406 Twelve items spanning several constructs were selected to get a more focused look at Employee Engagement. The Employee Engagement construct captures the degree to which employees are willing to go above and beyond, feel committed to the organization and are present while working. This construct measures the degree to which employees feel that their ideas count, their work impacts the organization and their well being and development is valued at the organization. Score Std. Dev. 2. In my work group I can share my opinions and ideas.4.14 0.96 5. Our organization is known for the quality of work we provide.4.13 0.81 6. I know how my work impacts others in the organization.4.38 0.71 10. My supervisor provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities.4.10 0.93 11. My supervisor recognizes outstanding work.3.94 1.07 12. I am given the opportunity to do my best work.4.22 0.80 14. My supervisor evaluates my performance fairly.4.05 0.97 18. I have adequate resources and equipment to do my job.4.00 0.81 21. The people I work with care about my personal well-being.4.01 0.92 22. I trust the people in my workplace.3.80 0.96 37. Training is made available to me so that I can do my job better.4.04 0.94 38. Training is made available to me for personal growth and development.3.93 1.04 E5 City of Schertz | 2024 Survey Customization Sheet Organizational Category Codes: Category 1 101 - CMO/CS/EDC 102 - EMS 103 - Engineering 104 - Finance 105 - Fire Department 106 - HR/Purchasing 107 - Internal Services 108 - Library 109 - Parks, Recreation, and Co 110 - Planning & Community Development 111 - Police Department 112 - Public Affairs 113 - Public Works Organizational Category Codes: Category 2 204 - Non-sworn 205 - Sworn 206 - Drainage 207 - Facility Services 208 - Fleet Services 209 - Streets 210 - Water/Wastewater Services 211 - Information Technology Organizational Category Codes: Category 3 301 - Less than 1 Year 302 - 1-2 Years 303 - 3-5 Years 304 - 6-10 Years 305 - 11-15 Years 306 - 16-20 Years 307 - 20+ Years Additional Items 1. My Executive Leadership Team (Dept. Head and City Mgmt.) provides me with a clear understanding of my work responsibilities. 2. My Executive Leadership Team recognizes outstanding work. 3. My Executive Leadership Team is consistent when administering policies concerning employees. 4. My Executive Leadership Team evaluates my performance fairly. 5. I feel that City and/or Department policies are adequate. F1