Loading...
07-01-2025 Agenda Packet       MEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL July 1, 2025                                 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA TUESDAY, JULY 1, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.        Call to Order   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Brown)   Employee Introductions   EMS - Part-time Paramedics: Hesham "Sam" Abielmona; Samantha Blackwell; Christopher Fierro; Sebastian Gonzalez-Lores; Blaine Leachman; and Michael McInnis. Parks & Recreation - Civic Center Coordinator Johnny Ruiz Police - Police Cadet Dash Harris Police - Public Safety Communications Officer Marcial Johnson Utility Billing - Utility Billing Specialist Maranda Chavez   Presentations   Presentation on the 2025 July 4th Jubilee (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum/C.Paddock)   TAMIO-Awards      City Events and Announcements  July 1, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 1  City Events and Announcements  Announcements of upcoming City Events (B.James/S.Gonzalez) Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S.Williams) Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R.Gutierrez)   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes – Approval of the minutes from the City Council Meeting on June 17, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney)   2.Appointments, Re-appointments, and Resignations - City of Schertz Boards, Commissions and Committees Resignations Parks and Recreation - Sharon Denson      3.Resolution 25-R-072 - Accepting semi-annual reports on the progress of the Capital Recovery Capital Improvements Plan during the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025 (B.James/K.Woodlee)   4.Resolution 25-R-084 - Authorizing a commercial lease agreement for the Kramer House July 1, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 2  4.Resolution 25-R-084 - Authorizing a commercial lease agreement for the Kramer House with The CHAMBER (Schertz-Cibolo-Selma Area) (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez)   Discussion and Action Items   5.Resolution 25-R-080 - Authorizing an application to FEMA for the Staffing Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program (S.Williams/G.Rodgers)   6.Resolution 25-R-070 - Approving the Guadalupe Appraisal District Real Estate Acquisition and Renovation of 216 E College Street, Seguin, TX (Mayor/S.Williams)   Public Hearings   7.Ordinance 25-S-026 - Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 8, Section 21.8.9 - Outdoor Display and Storage. (B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez)   8.Ordinance 25-S-027 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas)   9.Ordinance 25-S-029 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 173 acres of land from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310012, 309425, 309427, generally located 1,000 feet to the west of Cibolo Creek on Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas)   Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   10.Monthly Update - Major Projects in Progress/CIP (B.James/K.Woodlee)   11.Quarterly Update-City Council Approved Zoning and Specific Use Permit Ordinances in relation to current development status (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado)   Requests and Announcements  July 1, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 3  Requests and Announcements  Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff  Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council)     Adjournment   CERTIFICATION I, SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 25th DAY OF JUNE 2025 AT 4:30 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.    SHEILA EDMONDSON    I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON ________DAY OF ___________________, 2025. TITLE: _______________________________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210-619-1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.     July 1, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 4      COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS     Mayor Gutierrez Member Audit Committee Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee TIRZ II Board Liaison Board of Adjustments Senior Center Advisory Board-Alternate Councilmember Davis – Place 1 Member Interview Committee  Main Street Committee - Chair TIRZ II Board Liaison Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Schertz Housing Authority Board Transportation Safety Advisory Board Councilmember Watson – Place 2 Member Audit Committee Liaison Library Advisory Board Senior Center Advisory Board Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation-Ex-Officio               Councilmember Macaluso – Place 3 Member Interview Committee  Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee TIRZ II Board   Councilmember Guerrero – Place 4 Member Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Liaison Schertz Historical Preservation Society Councilmember Westbrook – Place 5 Liaison Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC)     Planning and Zoning Commission Schertz Historical Preservation Society Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation (CVLGC)-Alternate Councilmember Heyward – Place 6 Member Animal Services Advisory Committee Audit Committee Interview Committee-Chair Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Liaison Building and Standards Commission Economic Development Corporation - Alternate Senior Center Advisory Board Councilmember Brown – Place 7 Member Main Street Committee Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Liaison Economic Development Corporation      July 1, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 5  Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Parks, Recreation & Community Servic Subject:Presentation on the 2025 July 4th Jubilee (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum/C.Paddock) BACKGROUND City staff will present information regarding the upcoming July 4th Jubilee special event. Attachments Presentation 2025 July 4th Jubilee  4TH OF JULY JUBILEE 49th Annual Celebration Set Up: Monday, June 30th @ 7:30 AM PROJECT FLAGLINE Take Down: Monday, July 7th @ 7:30 AM 11 Sections Approx. 100 Volunteers MARKETING Billboard May 19 - July 7 Media Advisories Tuesday, June 18 & 30 Communication Website, Social Media, Magazine, E-mail Blasts, Letters to all businesses and residents in Aviation Heights Parade- 9:30AM “Let Freedom Reign” Freedom 5K- 9:15AM Begins from the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex C A R N I V A L Carnival opens at 11am Located at Thulemeyer Park, 901 Oak Street JUBILEE- 6PM Live Music with Gun Powder Soup Food Trucks Open Family Zone Opens Float & Fireworks Located at Pickrell Park, 701 Oak Street 7:00 PM Mayor & Council Welcome EVENING TIMELINE 9:13PM Star Spangled Banner 9:15PM Fireworks Spectacular COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Agenda No. 1.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Minutes – Approval of the minutes from the City Council Meeting on June 17, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney) Attachments 06-17-2025 Draft Minutes  D R A F T MINUTES REGULAR MEETING June 17, 2025 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on June 17, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to-wit: Present: Mayor Ralph Gutierrez; Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward; Councilmember Mark Davis; Councilmember Michelle Watson; Councilmember Paul Macaluso; Councilmember Ben Guerrero; Councilmember Robert Westbrook; Councilmember Tim Brown Staff present: City Manager Steve Williams; City Attorney Daniel Santee; Deputy City Manager Brian James; Assistant City Manager Sarah Gonzalez; City Secretary Sheila Edmondson; Deputy City Secretary Sheree Courney          Call to Order Mayor Gutierrez called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Heyward) Mayor Pro Tem Heyward provided the opening prayer and led the Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas.   Presentations   Presentation of Kick Cancer Pep Rally & 5K Run 2025 Donation to Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio MD Anderson Cancer Center. (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum/C.Paddock) Parks and Recreation Manager Cassie Paddock provided a recap of the Kick Cancer event that was held in March 2025 in honor of former Councilmember Tony Willenchek. This year the event raised $10,899.85 for the Mays Cancer Center. Ms. Paddock thanked the Clemens band and cheerleaders for bringing the spirit, and the following sponsors for their generous support: HEB, Schertz Cibolo Emergency Clinic, Remax, GVEC, Renewal by Anderson, Schertz Bank & Trust, State Farm Agent Nathan Oberron, and SAMCO Capital. Mayor Gutierrez and Ms. Paddock presented the check to Dr. Steven Zumaran, Director of Development for Cancer, Basic Sciences and Research. Dr. Zumaran thanked everyone for their continued support of cancer research.      1 City Events and Announcements Announcements of upcoming City Events (B.James/S.Gonzalez) Deputy City Manager Brian James announced upcoming city events. Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S.Williams) No announcements or recognitions were provided by City Manager Steve Williams. Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R.Gutierrez) No announcements or recognitions were provided by Mayor Gutierrez.   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Mayor Pro Tem Heyward recognized the following residents: Daniel Jameson, 1048 Richmond Drive, reminded everyone about the monthly VFW breakfast from 8-11 a.m. on Saturday, June 21, and he thanked Council for allowing the VFW to participate in the Memorial Day event. Floy Simmons, 1216 Cyrus McCormick, addressed the new trash service stating it was unrealistic to expect someone 90 years old to move the 96-gallon trash receptacles. She suggested staff needed training in community communications, and they needed to engage residents in the process. City Manager Steve Williams instructed Assistant City Manager Sarah Gonzalez to assist Ms. Simmons in applying for a modification with Frontier Waste so they will pick up and return the trash receptacles for her. Maggie Titterington, 1730 Schertz Parkway, provided an update on upcoming Chamber events, including the celebration of their 20th Anniversary (thanking the City of Schertz for being a founding member) and the Hyper group's pet supply drive for city shelters in Schertz, Cibolo, and Selma. Brent Bolter, 2633 Cloverbrook Lane, suggested that Council go to the Schertz Facebook page and read the comments regarding the new trash contract. He stated that more than a few residents are upset with the coming change that they have no control over. When he went to 2 thank the Republic staff as they picked up trash this week, they told him that he was not the only resident to thank them. He closed by thanking the city and specifically the department that was responsible for the recent re-striping Belmont Parkway. It is much appreciated.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes – Approval of the minutes from the City Council Workshop Meeting on June 3, 2025, and the City Council Meeting on June 3, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney)      2.Appointments, Re-appointments, and Resignations - City of Schertz Boards, Commissions and Committees Resignations Library-Linda Duvall Planning & Zoning-Richard Braud (not seeking reappointment) Appointments Library-Bradley Thuringer Parks -Sydney Shippey Historical Preservation Society-Rose Arispe Reappointments BOA Frank McElroy Reginna Agee Alfred Degollado Library Patti Paulson Laura Wilson Chris Bryan Margaret Riley Patti Dilworth Ruth Tienor Planning and Zoning and CIAC Roderick Hector Patric McMaster Judy Goldick-Commissioner to Alternate 1 Clayton Wallace-Alternate 1 to Commissioner David Hughes-Alternate 2 to Commissioner Parks and Recreation Tim Dusek-Alternate to Board Member   3 3.Resolution 25-R-067 - Authorizing an amendment to the Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Homestead Unit 9 (S.Williams/B.James)      4.Resolution 25-R-068 - Approval of the Heritage Oaks Wastewater Capital Recovery Offset Agreement (S.Williams/B.James)      5.Resolution 25-R-069 - Authorizing a new Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Graytown Unit 3A (S.Williams/B.James)      6.Resolution 25-R-071 – Authorizing expenditures with GenServe Inc. at the East Live Oak Water Facility for generator system replacement (B.James/D.Hardin/L.Busch/N.Ferris)      7.Resolution 25-R-073 - Authorizing an agreement with the Texas State Library and Archives Commission for the reimbursement of expenses incurred through the lending of Schertz Public Library materials to other libraries (S.Gonzalez/E.Bertoia)      8.Resolution 25-R-074 – Authorizing a task order agreement with Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. for professional engineering-related services on the Northcliffe Country Club Estates Water and Wastewater Main Replacement Project and updating the associated Capital Improvement Plan Project Sheets (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak)      9.Resolution 25-R-075 – Authorizing a task order agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for professional engineering-related services for the design of the 2025 SPAM Resurfacing Project and updating the associated Capital Improvement Plan project sheets (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak)      10.Resolution 25-R-076 – Authorizing a task order agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for professional engineering-related services for the design of the western portion of the Kramer Farm Subdivision Rehabilitation Project (B. James/K. Woodlee/J. Nowak)      11.Resolution 25-R-78 - Approving a Schertz Main Street Preservation Grant for 420 Curtiss (S.Williams/B.James) Mayor Gutierrez asked if any items needed to be removed for separate action. No items were removed. Mayor Gutierrez asked for a motion to approve consent agenda items #1-11.       Moved by Councilmember Michelle Watson, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward  AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward, Councilmember Mark Davis, 4  AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward, Councilmember Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Ben Guerrero, Councilmember Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Tim Brown Passed   Mayor Gutierrez recognized Mayor Pro Tem Heyward following the vote. Ms. Heyward welcomed Bradley Thuringer and Sydney Shippey who were in attendance. Thanking them for volunteering to serve on a city board. Mayor Gutierrez stated his appreciation for their service on the city boards as well. Discussion and Action Items   12.Resolution 25-R-079 - Authorizing an application to TxDOT for Transportation Alternatives funding and an Advanced Funding Agreement with TxDOT if the project is selected for The Great Northern Trail design and construction (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) Mayor Gutierrez recognized Parks and Recreation Director Lauren Shrum who introduced Resolution 25-R-079. Ms. Shrum provided a map of the area and provided background information regarding the Great Northern Trail project that they have been working on for several years. This trail is approximately 8 miles long and 10 feet wide, running from the southern Schertz city limits to northern Schertz near the Cypress Point neighborhood. Two years ago, the city acquired a piece of property, the Comal Dry Creek Nature Park off of FM 482 and Bunker Street. The city is working in conjunction with the Great Springs project on this application to TxDOT for funding for the section from FM 1103 to Cypress Point, then down Schwab Road to the Comal Dry Creek Nature Park. This call includes construction as well as design professional services. This program calls for a 20% match of local funds to 80% federal funds. This project is estimated at $7.7 million. To fund the City's match, they are looking at Parkland Dedication revenues over the next couple of years, possibly seeking EDC funding like other quality of life projects, and/or pushing back other projects listed in the CIP if they are awarded funding through this program call. They do have letters of support from the Great Springs Project, the Schertz Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, Comal County Commissioners' Court, Comal Trails Alliance, and the AAMPO. Also, TxDOT has provided a letter of no objection. Mayor Gutierrez opened the floor to Council for discussion. Councilmemember Westbrook asked the following questions: What criteria would be used to determine whether the Pickerell Park pool or Crescent Bend phase 2 would be delayed to support the match and whether this decision would return to Council for final approval? Ms. Shrum responded that the city works with the advisory board to prioritize capital improvement projects. Then they take it through the city staff process where they look at prioritizing projects comprehensively. Finally, yes, they would bring the capital improvement program to Council for approval each fiscal 1.    5 year. Would it be ADA compliant? Ms. Shrum responded the design would be done with ADA in mind. 2. Have Selma and New Braunfels been consulted about trail connectivity? Ms. Shrum responded that they have received a letter of support from New Braunfels for the Dry Comal Creek project, but they didn't receive one specifically for this. However, they are working on this from their direction to meet our trail network at this location on FM 482. She further indicated they have consulted with Selma on their trails master plan and have interlocked all of our trail plans for the future. 3. Councilmember Guerrero requested confirmation that the total cost is $7.7 million, so the city's match would be $1.5 million. He asked what the main area of funding would be for the city's match. Ms. Shrum confirmed the funding amounts and stated they had not worked out the funding yet. She reiterated they are looking at parkland revenue funds over the next couple of years, and they could present to the economic development corporation board like they've done for previous quality of life projects. It could come from multiple sources. Mayor Pro Tem Heyward asked if the city had reached out to our congressman for a community project funding application as a regional project, since we are connecting to other communities. Ms. Shrum stated they had not. Normally, you can't use federal funding as a match, but she'd look into it. Councilmember Brown asked for confirmation that the resolution brought forth this evening is only to request authorization to submit an application for a grant. The consideration for funding will only come if selected and that won't be known until around October. Ms. Shrum confirmed. Councilmember Tim Brown made a motion to approve Resolution 25-R-079, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward.    AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward, Councilmember Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Ben Guerrero, Councilmember Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Tim Brown Passed   Public Hearings 6 Public Hearings   13.Ordinance 25-S-024 – Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11 - Sign and Advertising Devices, Article 3 Boards, Commissions, and Committees - Section 21.3.3 - Planning and Zoning Commission, Article 7 - Nonconforming Uses, Lots, and Structures, and Article 16 – Definitions.(B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas) Mayor Gutierrez recognized Senior Planner Samuel Haas who introduced Ordinance 25-S-024. Mr. Haas provided background information related to the amendments. Last update to Article 11 occurred in 2017. Proposed changes include editorial changes to convey the information better, removing redundant and unnecessary language. The intent is to provide consistency with UDC and other city policies. Mr. Haas provided examples of the editorial changes and omitted redundancies. He then outlined changes to the code related to signs (wall signs, freestanding signs, and temporary signs.) The Planning and Zoning Commission met on May 7, 2025, and recommended approval with a 7-0 vote with modification to freestanding signs on FM roadways and Schertz Parkway to allow 35' tall sign. Staff made the proposed change. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 25-S-024. Mayor Gutierrez stated this item is on the agenda as a public hearing. Public Hearing opened at 6:42 p.m. The following residents spoke: Maggie Titterington, 1730 Schertz Parkway, spoke on behalf of several businesses. Ms. Titterington stated that the regulations on feather flags did not afford the same flexibility as other temporary signs. She asked council to consider increasing the duration from 14 to 28 days. These would be 7-day increments, allowing businesses to display their feather flags up to four times per year, consistent with the rest of the UDC code for temporary signs. This would support local business visibility, remaining mindful of the aesthetic, but being a little more fair and equitable, as well as providing more flexibility. She was appreciative of all the other changes and thanked the staff for all the work they put into the edits. Public Hearing closed at 6:46 p.m. Mayor Gutierrez opened the floor to Council for discussion. Councilmember Davis asked for clarification on the feather flags restriction to 14 days. Mr. Haas responded that businesses can have up to three feather flags which can be displayed for up to 14 days per calendar year. Councilmember Davis stated his concerns are (1) they aren't obstructing traffic or pedestrians, (2) the number of signs - happy capped at three, and (3) whether they are serviceable. He noted there are no comments regarding whether the flags are frayed, faded, unserviceable, ripped, or torn. He has no issue bumping the number of days    7 faded, unserviceable, ripped, or torn. He has no issue bumping the number of days from 14 to 28 or 30 so long as there was enforcement of their serviceability. Deputy City Manager Brian James stated they were not going to enforce the maintenance of feather flags. Councilmember Brown stated great job putting the changes together. It's a lot clearer, a lot easier to read. However, he agrees with Ms. Titterington, that on the feather flags, four 7-day periods a year is reasonable. Deputy City Manager James stated that staff is fine either way, but as a reminder, they have to pull a temporary permit to put the feather flag up for that week period. If the expectation is that staff enforce the code, we're going to enforce the code. The problem is, we're going to tell them to get a permit when they've already had the flags up for a week, so are we then going to tell them we aren't issuing a permit or do we issue the permit? This one is going to be a challenge and staff needs there to be an understanding that it's not always going to be handled in a way that every individual in the community feels it should be handled. Councilmember Brown responded that they understand there is always going to be that one business that is "special" but they trust the city to be able to manage it just like all the other signs we have. Mayor Gutierrez stated that Ms. Titterington was speaking on behalf of Schertz businesses. Therefore, the comments she made should be given strong consideration to allow 28 days. Mayor Ralph Gutierrez motioned to approve Ordinance 25-S-024, seconded by Councilmember Mark Davis.    AYE: Councilmember Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Tim Brown NAY: Mayor Pro Tem Allison Heyward, Councilmember Ben Guerrero Passed   Workshop   14.Review of Ordinance 23-M-28 City Council Rules of Conduct and Procedure (Mayor Gutierrez) Mayor Gutierrez opened the workshop Review of Ordinance 23-M-28 asking if there were any questions or comments regarding general grammar or misspelling edits. None being noted, he went on to discuss four items: 1. Under Article 2.2.B Absences: the city secretary should be annotating a Councilmember's absence and the reason therefore in the minutes of the meeting from which the Councilmember is absent. This is currently not being enforced. Question for Council is do you want to enforce it or remove it? Mayor Pro Tem Heyward asked if this is something that we have not enforced, and    8 we haven't had an issue with it, or is it to let residents know why a Councilmember is absent from the dais so its more transparent? Mayor Gutierrez responded that he believed that is why it was added to the Rules and Procedures and didn't think they needed to be specific as to why a Councilmember is not in attendance. They can make it very general by using medical, training, work-related, or personal or they can simply remove it from the article. Councilmember Brown stated that if we aren't doing anything to enforce he wasn't sure it needed to remain. He asked if there were any known issues with this council or previous councils? Councilmember Guerrero concurred with Councilmember Brown. If it hasn't been an issue then we don't need it. City Attorney Dan Santee stated that the Charter says the Mayor or a Councilmember shall forfeit his or her office upon the failure to regularly attend City Council meetings without an approved absence obtained by a majority vote by City Council either before or after the absence. There shall be a presumption of failure to regularly attend when three (3) regular meetings are missed during a term year without obtaining an approved absence from City Council. Mayor Gutierrez stated the Charter overrides the Council's Rules and Procedures, so they will enforce it. They will make general comments, whether it is work-related, personal, or medical, and it will be added to the minutes. He went on to say that as the presiding officer, during announcements and recognitions by the Mayor, he will annotate at that point any absences so they can be put on the record. 2. Article 7: there's a conflict between the City Charter and the Council Rules and Procedures regarding the number of readings required for an ordinance from two readings to one reading. Councilmember Westbrook asked for clarification on the placement of an ordinance on the agenda. Mayor Gutierrez explained that that language was specific to the need for two readings and was no longer relevant. 3. Article 11.1: No person may concurrently serve on more than one board unless by virtue of his or her position on Council. Currently, we have members serving on more than one board, committee, or commission. Question is do we enforce it or do we make adjustments to this policy? Mayor Pro Tem Heyward stated we are not currently enforcing it and didn't see the need to change whether they are on more than one board. Additionally, she stated there could be legislative changes that will affect the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC). Some of the members of CIAC are members of the Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z). There are also special requirements for the Building and Standards Board which doesn't meet often and may be filled by members of another board. She believes the number of volunteers serving on multiple boards has decreased. Mayor Gutierrez stated he understands why these articles were included in their Rules and Procedures, but most of them occurred prior to anyone currently serving on Council. He stated part of it was to extend the opportunities for more participation. However, if we don't limit we could have members on more than two boards. Question is whether to limit board membership to one board, two boards, or unlimited? Councilmember Davis asked for clarification regarding if this was Councilmembers on boards or residents on boards. He went on to explain that 9 historically, there have been instances where there were no volunteer applications to fill board vacancies, so limiting volunteers would not be in the best interest of the city. He feels if we had sufficient volunteers there are members who serve on multiple boards that would step aside for a new applicant. We need the flexibility to allow members to sit on multiple boards. It may be problematic to have someone that is on EDC and P&Z, but not Parks and TSAC concurrently, so those cases should be looked at independently. He asked if members of P&Z were required to be CIAC. Deputy City Manager Brian James stated that it is not a requirement for members of P&Z to be on CIAC, however, because of the requirements for CIAC, sometimes members of P&Z have the required qualifications to serve on CIAC. However, that could change with the new legislation. The Building and Standards Commission is another example that requires specific skill sets that are difficult to fill requiring the city to use members from other boards. He further stated that he didn't think Council needed to constrain themselves to a specific number of boards, committees, and commissions. Mayor Pro Tem Heyward stated this could be an issue addressed by the Interview Committee, since you have 3 Councilmembers on this committee in addition to board, committee, and commission chairs. She felt there was no need to put a policy in place. Councilmember Macaluso stated he believes we do have a shortage of volunteers, especially for certain committees. However, he does see how there should be a restriction to allow someone on the Parks Board to serve on the EDC or the EDC to serve on P&Z. So, can we specify certain boards that an individual could not concurrently serve on and allow more flexibility on the others. Mayor Gutierrez stated we could certainly make that change. Councilmember Westbrook addressed Mayor Pro Tem Heyward's point, regarding the Interview Committee being the gatekeeper. When should Council be notified that we have someone serving on multiple boards? Mayor Gutierrez stated that without it being in the policy, the Council wouldn't be notified. Mayor Pro Tem Heyward stated that during the interview process they would identify individuals applying for certain boards that are serving on others and ensure they don't serve concurrently on specified boards. It is the Interview Committee that brings up recommendations for the Council to vote upon, so if the recommendation doesn't come up, then Council won't be asked to vote on it. Councilmember Brown read the following excerpt from the Rules and Procedures, 'membership and selection of members shall be determined by the Council if not specified by the Charter, the Code of Ordinances, or State law.' He went on to say, it is up to the Council except in those three cases. You can't say 'OK interview committee, you're in charge of policy unless we have a policy.' Councilmember Davis stated that the only thing he is hearing from Council is that there are certain combinations that they probably want to stay away from. Instead of saying you can't be on more than two boards or you can't be on more than three, it would be better to specify appointed board members cannot serve concurrently on Board "A" and Board "B" or on Board "B" and Board "C". He is more concerned with someone sitting on EDC and P&Z, than he is with someone sitting on Parks and P&Z. Councilmember Guerrero concurs with Councilmember Macaluso. He would allow members to serve on two boards since there aren't too many currently serving on multiple boards and the number of applicants is low. 10 Councilmember Macaluso added an issue with serving on Parks and EDC since they are using EDC funds to fund some of the park projects, but doesn't think they need to limit the number of boards to two. The Interview Board looks at rosters and would be cognizant of the individual board memberships. Councilmember Brown would like the wording to be something along the lines of allowing multiple boards with the exception of serving concurrently on EDC, Parks, and P&Z. 4. Article 11.1 Persons related within the second degree by affinity or consanguinity to the Mayor or other any member of the Council shall not be eligible to serve on a standing committee. (Note: due to potential or perceived conflict of interest, Mayor Pro Tem Heyward recused herself from the dais.) Councilmember Davis stated this had come up before when they had an applicant who applied to be on a board or commission that was related to a Councilmember. He served on the Interview Committee when this occurred and he stated the discussion was more of 'is it a public appearance?' The individual wanted to be on Planning and Zoning. The Interview Committee's concern was that there are a few boards that have specific responsibilities that weigh heavily coming into the City Council, particularly Planning and Zoning and EDC. Beyond that all the other committees are like advisory positions. Parks and Rec come in with a recommendation for a park or a trail, but they have no obligation or authority other than the recommendation to Council. It is public perception that if a family member recommends something and the Councilmember approves it or concurs with it on the dais, the cards are stacked. Councilmember Davis doesn't perceive this to be an issue with the Library Board, Parks Board or TSAC. Recommendations from TSAC get vetted by staff before they are brought forward to Council. Boards that are more autonomous with a lot more authority would be P&Z and EDC. If any restrictions are going to be placed on family members serving on boards and commissions it should be limited to not allowing service on P&Z and EDC. Mayor Gutierrez added Board of Adjustments, Building and Standards. Deputy City Manager suggested possibly TIRZ. Mayor Gutierrez added TIRZ to the list. Language will be added stating family members can not serve on P&Z, EDC, BOA, Building and Standards, or TIRZ.   Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   15.Petition for Removal of Property from the City of Schertz ETJ - Update on approximately 6.46 Acre ETJ Release in Northern Schertz near FM 2252 within Comal County (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado)      Requests and Announcements 11 Requests and Announcements Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff No requests were made by the Mayor or Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff. Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda No requests were made by the Mayor or Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future agenda. City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council) Mayor Pro Tem Heyward attended GFOAT Budget Academy a 16-hour training and the TML Financial Bootcamp. She received her Certified Municipal Officer Legacy pin. Councilmember Davis attended the Interview Committee, TSAC, Parks & Rec Board, and the Housing Authority meetings. Councilmember Macaluso attended the Interview Committee meeting. Councilmember Guerrero attended the Youth Firefighters graduation and the VFW meeting.   Adjournment Mayor Gutierrez adjourned the meeting at 7:26 p.m.   _______________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary 12 Agenda No. 3.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject: Resolution 25-R-072 - Accepting semi-annual reports on the progress of the Capital Recovery Capital Improvements Plan during the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025 (B.James/K.Woodlee) BACKGROUND Section 395.058 (c) (4) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to file semi-annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvement plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing impact fees.  Section 90-158 of the City's Code of Ordinances includes the same requirement. Active projects and associated expenses that are funded at least in part using Impact Fee Funds the periods of the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025 were as follows: Water  Corbett Ground Storage Tank  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  $2,902,306.94  Professional services - $11,971.71 Construction - $2,890,335.23 Status:  Construction ongoing 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  $2,255,047.44  Professional services - $5,120.00 Construction - $2,249,927.44 Status:  Construction ongoing - Completion expected Fall 2025 City-wide Water Master Plan and Impact Fee Update Study  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  $25,789.18  Computer Fees & Licenses - $5,640.00 Professional services - $20,149.18 Status:  Capital Improvement Plan finalized and cost estimates prepared 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $11,739.40 Status:  Financial analyses, calculation of maximum assessable rates, first presentations of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and maximum rates and rates to be charged Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin and Graytown to Pfeil Loop Lines  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  Professional Services - $7,300.77 Status:  Design and easement acquisition efforts continuing 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional Services - $14,334.56 Status:  Easement acquisition efforts continuing - several parcel payments pending Sewer  Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Project  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  $1,002,285.95  Professional services - $119,253.91 Construction - $883,032.04 Status:  Construction nearing completion - lift station testing occurring - startup projected 1st half FY25 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  $622,023.69  Professional services - $50,020.38 Construction - $572,003.31 Status:  Lift station put into operation March 3, 2025 - Final completion of project expected Summer/Fall 2025 City-wide Wastewater Master Plan and Impact Fee Update Study  2nd half FY24  Expenses:  $25,789.17  Computer Fees & Licenses - $5,640.00 Professional services - $20,149.17 Status:  Capital Improvement Plan finalized and cost estimates prepared 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $11,739.40 Status:  Financial analyses, calculation of maximum assessable rates, first presentations of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and maximum rates and rates to be charged Cibolo West Wastewater Trunk Main  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses - project not started 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $27,943.00 Status:  Route Study underway Roadway  Service Area 1  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses 1st Half FY25 - No Expenses Service Area 2  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses 1st Half FY25 - Expenses - $54,976.89 annual partial reimbursement to Babcock Road 165, Ltd., for cost of Ripps Kreusler extension ($92,794.75 remaining to be paid) Service Areas 3 and 4  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses 1st Half FY25 - No Expenses The Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) recommended that Council accept the reports for the semi-annual periods of the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025 during their meeting on June 4, 2025.   GOAL The goal of Resolution 25-R-072 is Council acceptance of the semi-annual reports regarding capital recovery funds for the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025. COMMUNITY BENEFIT The benefit of the semi-annual report process and acceptance of the report is compliance with State law and the City's Code of Ordinances to ensure that capital recovery fees are being collected and spent appropriately. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 25-R-072 accepting the Capital Recovery Semi-Annual Reports as recommended by the CIAC. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 25-R-072. Attachments Resolution 25-R-072 w attachments  RESOLUTION 25-R-072 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, ACCEPTING THE SEMIANNUAL REPORTS WITH RESPECT TO THE CAPTIAL RECOVERY CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) has reviewed the revenue and expenditures relating to the established Capital Recovery Fees in accordance with the Capital Improvements Plans for the City of Schertz; and WHEREAS, the City Council accepts the Semiannual Reports as filed by the CIAC in accordance with Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the Capital Recovery Balance Report with respect to the Capital Improvement Plans for the City of Schertz, Texas, for the period between April 1, 2024, through September 30, 2024, as shown in the attached report and minutes of the June 4, 2025, City of Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meeting. Section 2. The City Council hereby accepts the Capital Recovery Balance Report with respect to the Capital Improvement Plans for the City of Schertz, Texas, for the period between October 1, 2024, through March 31, 2025, as shown in the attached report and minutes of the June 4, 2025, City of Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee meeting. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 4. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 8. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this ___ day of __________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) ATTACHMENT A CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT April 1, 2024, to September 31, 2024 CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT April 1, 2024 TO September 30, 2024 ************** IMPACTS FEES ************** Water Sewer Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1 3,000,909.18 972,867.57 3,973,776.75 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees (2,902,306.94)(64,220.81)#(3,888,462.61) Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 98,602.24 908,646.76 #1,007,249.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,103,989.08 1,445,725.97 7,549,715.05 Revenues: Impact Fees 683,074.00 635,932.68 1,319,006.68 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 1,165.90 8,153.03 9,318.93 Investments Income 173,899.71 125,507.99 299,407.70 Expenses: Computer Fees & Licenses 5,640.00 5,640.00 Professional Services 20,149.18 20,149.18 40,298.36 Auditor/Accounting Services 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 1,444,222.00 1,444,222.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 831,350.43 (701,417.48)129,932.95 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,935,339.51 744,308.49 7,679,648.00 Estimated Cost of Unfunded Projects Loop Lines 1,125,000.00 Capital Impact Fee Study 11,739.40 25,093.25 Cibolo West Trunk Line 16,213,000.00 Total Unfunded Project Costs 1,136,739.40 16,238,093.25 17,374,832.65 Unfunded Projects to Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 2 5,798,600.11 (15,493,784.76)(9,695,184.65) 1 2 Negative Unfunded Projects to Ending Impact Fee Balance to be funded by future revenues or through other sources Allocated Impact Fee Balances only include Capital Recovery funds and not funds from any other source. It also assumes Capital Recovery Funds are used first when allocated. Capital Improvements Program SE Quad Pump Station SE Quad GST SE Quad Elevated Tank SE Quad Distribution Mains NE Quad Distribution Mains IH10 Corridor Distribution Mains Original Cost Estimate 1,688,289$ 1,100,000$ 1,250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,000,000$ Current Project Designation Corbett Ground Storage Tank Corbett Ground Storage Tank- RL2 Corbett Elevated Tank - RL1 Loop Lines - WA1 Current Cost Estimate 5,000,000$ 5,650,000$ 4,641,302$ Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 12,251.14$ 2014 500.00$ 2015 86,166.10$ 2016 3,050,000.00$ 2017 2018 2019 1,375,000.00$ 2020 2021 512,000.00$ 2022 4,230,818.70$ Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ 4,742,818.70$ 4,523,917.24$ -$ -$ -$ Other Funding Sources -$ 364,092.72$ 633,024.89$ 1,146,643.35$ -$ -$ Total Project Funding Sources -$ 5,106,911.42$ 5,156,942.13$ 1,146,643.35$ -$ -$ Project Annual Expenses Second Half 2013 12,251.14$ First Half 2014 6.77$ Second Half 2014 2,081.13$ First Half 2015 980.00$ Second Half 2015 120,233.32$ First Half 2016 87,843.28$ Second Half 2016 22,763.75$ First Half 2017 -$ Second Half 2017 40,403.20$ First Half 2018 6,248.00$ Second Half 2018 7,485.13$ First Half 2019 50,510.63$ Second Half 2019 1,994,741.24$ First Half 2020 1,385,858.48$ Second Half 2020 1,161,122.42$ First Half 2021 172,980.16$ Second Half 2021 114,254.48$ 91,433.48$ First Half 2022 154,707.22$ Second Half 2022 124,820.80$ First Half 2023 21,629.11$ 40,455.00$ Second Half 2023 641,187.27$ 80,810.00$ First Half 2024 685,310.64$ 5,823.00$ Second Half 2024 2,902,306.94$ 7,300.77$ Total Expenses -$ 4,644,216.46$ 5,156,942.13$ 134,388.77$ -$ -$ Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance -$ 98,602.24$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Balance -$ 462,694.96$ -$ 1,012,254.58$ -$ -$ Project Status Future On Going Complete On Going Future Future Capital Recovery Water Projects Capital Improvements Program Original Cost Estimate Current Project Designation Current Cost Estimate Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ -$ -$ 626,828.54$ 9,655,000.00$ -$ Other Funding Sources Bond 2007 931,739.74$ Bond 2013 3,069,305.46$ Total Project Funding Sources Project Annual Expenses First Half 2012 Second Half 2012 First Half 2013 Second Half 2013 First Half 2014 Second Half 2014 First Half 2015 Second Half 2015 First Half 2016 Second Half 2016 First Half 2017 Second Half 2017 First Half 2018 Second Half 2018 First Half 2019 Second Half 2019 First Half 2020 Second Half 2020 First Half 2021 Second Half 2021 First Half 2022 Second Half 2022 First Half 2023 Second Half 2023 First Half 2024 Second Half 2024 Total Expenses Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance Project Balance Project Status 1,002,285.95$ -$ -$ 462,515.44$ -$ -$ Capital Recovery Sewer Projects Final South Sewershed Master Plan Town Creek Phase III Town Creek Phase IV Woman Hollering Creek STP PH II South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station Town Creek Phase III - QA3 Crossvines Batch Plant Expansion - QA4 Woman Hollering Trunk Line - QA2/Q01 Cibolo West Trunk Line - WA1 15,000$ 659,126$ 1,000,000$ 600,000$ 9,600,000$ 931,740$ 487,848$ 12,000,000$ 16,213,000.0$ 487,848.00$ -$ 7,795,000.00$ 12,724,305.46$ 626,828.54$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ -$ -$ 980.00$ 50,676.07$ -$ 82,262.17$ -$ 46,690.62$ 74,054.70$ -$ 28,743.00$ 6,642.30$ -$ 815,683.00$ 26,911.24$ -$ 5,858.72$ -$ 10,268.18$ 33,784.40$ 27,210.41$ 11,105.00$ 121,481.22$ 83,940.36$ 157,004.53$ 212,479.83$ 247,870.62$ 1,703,004.22$ 3,886,885.47$ -$ 10,175.48$ 56,860.59$ 235,360.91$ -$ -$ -$ 16,123.52$ 3,715,891.65$ Future Complete Future On Going On Going Future -$ -$ -$ 185,891.64$ 722,755.12$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 185,891.64$ 722,755.12$ -$ 12,001,550.34$ -$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 440,936.90$ 138,980.54$ 1,860,000.00$ -$ 6,615.06$ 6,000.00$ 85,555.02$ 143,307.30$ CITY OF SCHERTZ ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REPORT April 1, 2024 TO September 30, 2024 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,294,044.60 753,948.21 2,042,470.20 6,584.23 4,097,047.24 Revenues: Impact Fees 244,305.76 72,736.78 124,690.00 0.00 441,732.54 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 432.79 136.03 430.19 0.05 999.06 Investments Income 36,964.82 21,240.79 56,629.77 180.81 115,016.19 Expenses: Development Incentive Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RightOfWay/Easements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 281,703.37 94,113.60 181,749.96 180.86 557,747.79 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,575,747.97 848,061.81 2,224,220.16 6,765.09 4,654,795.03 ******************** ROADWAY IMPACTS FEES ******************** ATTACHMENT B CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT October 1, 2024, to March 31, 2025 CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT October 1, 2024 TO March 31, 2025 ************** IMPACTS FEES ************** Water Sewer Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1 1,806,249.76 908,646.76 2,714,896.52 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees (98,602.24)(349,966.69)(448,568.93) Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1,707,647.52 558,680.07 #2,266,327.59 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,935,339.51 744,308.49 7,549,715.05 Revenues: Impact Fees 746,981.38 370,296.00 1,117,277.38 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 1,794.53 31,605.37 33,399.90 Investments Income 167,350.76 61,944.78 229,295.54 Expenses: Computer Fees & Licenses 0.00 0.00 Professional Services 11,739.40 11,739.40 23,478.80 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 854,387.27 452,106.75 1,306,494.02 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 7,789,726.78 1,196,415.24 8,986,142.02 Estimated Cost of Unfunded Projects Loop Lines 1,125,000.00 Cibolo West Trunk Line 15,913,000.00 Total Unfunded Project Costs 1,125,000.00 15,913,000.00 17,038,000.00 Unfunded Projects to Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 2 6,664,726.78 (14,716,584.76)(8,051,857.98) 1 2 Negative Unfunded Projects to Ending Impact Fee Balance to be funded by future revenues or through other sources Allocated Impact Fee Balances only include Capital Recovery funds and not funds from any other source. It also assumes Capital Recovery Funds are used first when allocated. Capital Improvements Program SE Quad Pump Station SE Quad GST SE Quad Elevated Tank SE Quad Distribution Mains NE Quad Distribution Mains IH10 Corridor Distribution Mains Original Cost Estimate 1,688,289$ 1,100,000$ 1,250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,000,000$ Current Project Designation Corbett Ground Storage Tank Corbett Ground Storage Tank- RL2 Corbett Elevated Tank - RL1 Loop Lines - WA1 Current Cost Estimate 5,000,000$ 5,650,000$ 4,641,302$ Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 12,251.14$ 2014 500.00$ 2015 86,166.10$ 2016 3,050,000.00$ 2017 2018 2019 1,375,000.00$ 2020 2021 512,000.00$ 2022 4,230,818.70$ Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ 4,742,818.70$ 4,523,917.24$ -$ -$ -$ Grants -$ 3,500,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Other Funding Sources -$ 364,092.72$ 633,024.89$ 1,181,593.09$ -$ -$ Total Project Funding Sources -$ 8,606,911.42$ 5,156,942.13$ 1,181,593.09$ -$ -$ Project Annual Expenses Second Half 2013 12,251.14$ First Half 2014 6.77$ Second Half 2014 2,081.13$ First Half 2015 980.00$ Second Half 2015 120,233.32$ First Half 2016 87,843.28$ Second Half 2016 22,763.75$ First Half 2017 -$ Second Half 2017 40,403.20$ First Half 2018 6,248.00$ Second Half 2018 7,485.13$ First Half 2019 50,510.63$ Second Half 2019 1,994,741.24$ First Half 2020 1,385,858.48$ Second Half 2020 1,161,122.42$ First Half 2021 172,980.16$ Second Half 2021 114,254.48$ 91,433.48$ First Half 2022 154,707.22$ Second Half 2022 124,820.80$ First Half 2023 21,629.11$ 40,455.00$ Second Half 2023 641,187.27$ 80,810.00$ First Half 2024 685,310.64$ 5,823.00$ Second Half 2024 2,902,306.94$ 7,300.77$ First Half 2025 2,255,047.44$ 14,334.56$ Total Expenses -$ 6,899,263.90$ 5,156,942.13$ 148,723.33$ -$ -$ Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance -$ 1,707,647.52$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Balance -$ -$ -$ 1,032,869.76$ -$ -$ Project Status Future On Going Complete On Going Future Future Capital Recovery Water Projects Capital Improvements Program Original Cost Estimate Current Project Designation Current Cost Estimate Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2025 Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ -$ -$ 440,936.90$ 9,840,891.64$ 300,000.00$ Other Funding Sources Bond 2007 931,739.74$ Bond 2013 3,069,305.46$ Total Project Funding Sources Project Annual Expenses First Half 2012 Second Half 2012 First Half 2013 Second Half 2013 First Half 2014 Second Half 2014 First Half 2015 Second Half 2015 First Half 2016 Second Half 2016 First Half 2017 Second Half 2017 First Half 2018 Second Half 2018 First Half 2019 Second Half 2019 First Half 2020 Second Half 2020 First Half 2021 Second Half 2021 First Half 2022 Second Half 2022 First Half 2023 Second Half 2023 First Half 2024 Second Half 2024 First Half 2025 Total Expenses Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance Project Balance Project Status 27,943.00$ 622,023.69$ -$ (185,891.64)$ 185,891.64$ 300,000.00$ 138,980.54$ 1,860,000.00$ -$ 6,615.06$ 6,000.00$ 85,555.02$ 143,307.30$ -$ -$ -$ 0.00$ 286,623.07$ 272,057.00$ 12,623,574.03$ 27,943.00$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 440,936.90$ Future Complete Future Complete On Going On Going -$ -$ -$ -$ 286,623.07$ 272,057.00$ 1,703,004.22$ 3,886,885.47$ -$ 10,175.48$ 56,860.59$ 235,360.91$ -$ -$ -$ 16,123.52$ 3,715,891.65$ 157,004.53$ 212,479.83$ 247,870.62$ 10,268.18$ 33,784.40$ 27,210.41$ 11,105.00$ 121,481.22$ 83,940.36$ 815,683.00$ 26,911.24$ -$ 5,858.72$ -$ 46,690.62$ 74,054.70$ -$ 28,743.00$ 6,642.30$ -$ 980.00$ 50,676.07$ -$ 82,262.17$ -$ -$ 12,910,197.10$ 440,936.90$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 300,000.00$ -$ 7,795,000.00$ 487,848.00$ 931,740$ 440,937$ 12,000,000$ 16,213,000.0$ 1,002,285.95$ -$ -$ 462,515.44$ -$ -$ Capital Recovery Sewer Projects Final South Sewershed Master Plan Town Creek Phase III Town Creek Phase IV Woman Hollering Creek STP PH II South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station Town Creek Phase III - QA3 Crossvines Batch Plant Expansion - QA4 Woman Hollering Trunk Line - QA2/Q01 Cibolo West Trunk Line - WA1 15,000$ 659,126$ 1,000,000$ 600,000$ 9,600,000$ CITY OF SCHERTZ ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REPORT October 1, 2024 TO March 31, 2025 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,575,747.97 848,061.81 2,224,220.16 6,765.09 4,654,795.03 Revenues: Impact Fees 120,814.74 3,370.00 225,790.00 0.00 349,974.74 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 308.72 81.49 201.05 0.06 591.32 Investments Income 38,748.79 19,439.00 54,268.83 160.73 112,617.35 Expenses: Development Incentive Fund 0.00 54,976.89 0.00 0.00 54,976.89 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RightOfWay/Easements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 159,872.25 (32,086.40)280,259.88 160.79 408,206.52 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,735,620.22 815,975.41 2,504,480.04 6,925.88 5,063,001.55 ******************** ROADWAY IMPACTS FEES ******************** ATTACHMENT C CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE June 4, 2025, Meeting Minutes D R A F T PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES June 4, 2025 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on June 4, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; Tamara Brown, Commissioner; John Carbon, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner; Mark Penshorn, Commissioner; David Hughes, Commissioner Absent: Roderick Hector, Commissioner; Clayton Wallace, Commissioner Staff present: Brian James, Deputy City Manager Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Development Kathy Woodlee, City Engineer Larry Busch, Director of Public Works Daisy Marquez, Planner Sarah Rodriguez, Administrative Assistant              1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Chairman Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.   2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED David Hughes was seated as the alternate.   3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Committee of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. No one spoke.   4.PUBLIC HEARING:   A.Hold a public hearing, consider, and file the past two semi-annual reports evaluating the    A.Hold a public hearing, consider, and file the past two semi-annual reports evaluating the progress of the City on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. Mrs. Kathy Woodlee gave a presentation. Chairman Outlaw opened the public hearing at 6:14 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the public hearing at 6:15 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick to recommend approval to City Council.  Vote: 8 - 0 Passed   5.ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Chairman Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 6:24 P.M.   ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz Agenda No. 4.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Human Resources Subject:Resolution 25-R-084 - Authorizing a commercial lease agreement for the Kramer House with The CHAMBER (Schertz-Cibolo-Selma Area) (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez) BACKGROUND Since 2009, the City has leased the Kramer House to The CHAMBER (Schertz-Cibolo-Selma Area) for use as its business headquarters and City's Visitor Center. The last renewal was authorized by Council in 2019 via Resolution 19-R-111. Both parties have a mutual desire to continue this partnership. The contract has not undergone any substantive changes, and therefore, remains the same as the agreement approved by Council in 2019. The agreement includes a base rent of $650 per month, paid in quarterly installments of $1,950, and may be terminated by either party with 90-days written notice to the other party.  GOAL To lease the Kramer House to The Chamber for business and visitor operations. COMMUNITY BENEFIT To provide efficient and effective visitor center promotions to the benefit of local residents and businesses and to maximize the use of City facilities. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve Resolution 25-R-084 FISCAL IMPACT The lease agreement will bring in $7,800.00 in revenue to the City annually. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 25-R-084 Attachments Resolution 25-R-084 with attachments  RESOLUTION 25-R-084 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT FOR THE KRAMER HOUSE WITH THE CHAMBER (SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-SELMA AREA) WHEREAS, both the City of Schertz and The CHAMBER desire to renew the lease agreement of the Kramer House for The CHAMBER’S business headquarters and City’s Visitor Center; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to lease the Kramer House to The CHAMBER for business and visitor operations pursuant to the Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the lease agreement for the Kramer House with The CHAMBER in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the _______ day of _______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary EXHIBIT A Commercial Lease Agreement 1 COMMERCIAL LEASE AGREEMENT FOR GOOD AND VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and confessed, the Landlord named below leases to the Tenant named below, and Tenant leases from Landlord, the Premises described below pursuant to the terms of this Commercial Lease Agreement (this “Lease”) entered into effective as of the Effective Date specified below. A. Basic terms of the Lease: 1. Effective Date: July 1, 2025 2. Landlord: CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS 3. Landlord Contact Information: 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: City Manager Phone: (210) 619-1020 Facsimile: (210) 619-1029 Email: steve.williams@schertz.com 4. Tenant: The CHAMBER (Schertz-Cibolo-Selma Area) 5. Tenant Contact Information: 1730 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: President/Chair of the Board Phone: (210) 566-9000 Facsimile: (210) 619-1959 Email: President@schertzchamber.org 6. Premises: The Kramer House located at 1730 Schertz Parkway, and more particularly described on Exhibit A. 7. Base Rent: Six Hundred Fifty Dollars and No/100 ($650.00) per month payable in quarterly installments for the Kramer House. 8. Commencement Date: July 1, 2025 9. Termination Date: September 30, 2030, as may be extended pursuant to Section H (26) of this Lease or by written agreement of the Landlord and Tenant. 10. Security Deposit: $0.00 11. Use: Business headquarters and Visitors’ Center 2 12. Insurance: Amount of liability insurance to be maintained by Tenant: Death/bodily injury: One Million and No/100 Dollars ($1,000,000.00) Property: Two Hundred Fifty Thousand and No/100 Dollars ($250,000.00) B. Definitions: 1. “Rent” means Base Rent plus any other amounts of money due Landlord by Tenant under the terms of the lease. 2. “Essential Services” means utility connections reasonably necessary for occupancy of the Premises for the Use. C. Tenant agrees to: 1. Lease the Premises for the entire term of this Lease beginning on the Commencement Date and ending on the Termination Date. 2. Accept the Premises in their present condition “AS IS.” 3. Pay quarterly, in advance, on the first day of January, April, July and October, the Base Rent to Landlord at Landlord’s address; provided, the Base Rent due each quarter will be $1,950.00. 4. Pay, as Additional Rent, all other amounts due under this Lease, when due and payable. 5. Pay a late charge of five percent (5%) of any Rent not received by Landlord by the tenth day after it is due, and, so long as Rent is paid within this timeframe, such payment shall not be a default under this Lease. 6. Allow Landlord to enter the Premises to perform Landlord’s obligations, inspect the Premises, and show the Premises to prospective purchasers or tenants, at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice. 7. Repair, replace, and maintain any part of the Premises that Landlord is not obligated to repair, replace, or maintain, normal wear expected. 8. Repair any damages to the Premises caused by Tenant. 9. Submit in writing to Landlord any requests for repairs, replacement, and maintenance that are the obligations of Landlord. 10. Maintain public liability insurance for the Premises and the conduct of Tenant’s business, naming Landlord as an additional insured, in the amounts stated in Section A(12) of this Lease. 11. Deliver certificates of insurance to Landlord when requested. 3 12. Indemnify, defend, and hold Landlord harmless from any loss, attorney fees, court and other costs, or claims arising out of Tenant’s use of the Premises, except to the extent caused by the negligence of Landlord or Landlord’s agents, employees, invitees, licensees, or visitors. 13. Vacate the Premises on termination of this Lease. 14. Within fifteen (15) business days after Landlord’s written request, execute an estoppel certificate that states the Commencement Date and Termination Date of this Lease, identifies any amendments to this Lease, describes any rights to extend the Term or purchase rights, lists defaults by Landlord, and provides any other information reasonable requested by Landlord. D. Tenant Agrees not to: 1. Use the Premises for any purpose other than stated in the Lease. 2. Create a nuisance or commit waste on the Premises. 3. Use the Premises in any way that is extra hazardous and would increase Landlord’s insurance premiums. 4. Alter the Premises, except for painting, flooring, and maintenance-related alterations, without Landlord’s consent. 5. Allow a lien to be placed on the Premises. 6. Use the roof on the Premises, except for locating the HVAC serving the Premises in the same manner as it is currently located. E. Landlord agrees to: 1. Lease to Tenant the Premises for the entire term beginning on the Commencement Date and ending on the Termination Date. 2. Provide the following services to Tenant: landscaping, routine facility maintenance, and janitorial services. The premises will be outfitted for utilities, telephone, and internet, but all associated monthly costs will be the Tenant’s responsibility. F. Landlord agrees not to: 1. Interfere with Tenant’s possession of the Premises as long as Tenant is not in default. 2. If Tenant is not in default, interfere with Tenant’s peaceful, quiet, and undisturbed use and possession of the Premises and all rights and privileges pertaining thereto, subject to the terms, conditions, and provisions of this Lease. G. Assignment: 1. This lease is not assignable and is non-transferable by Tenant. 4 H. Landlord and Tenant agree to the following: 1. Alterations. Any physical additions or improvements to the Premises made by Tenant will become the property of the Landlord. 2. Release of Claims/Subrogation. Landlord and Tenant release each other from any claim, by subrogation or otherwise, for any damage to the Premises by reason or fire or the elements, regardless of cause, including negligence of Landlord or Tenant. This release applies only to the extent that is permitted by law, the damage is covered by insurance proceeds, and the release does not adversely affect any insurance coverage. 3. Notice to Insurance Companies. Landlord and Tenant will notify the issuing insurance companies of the release set forth in the preceding paragraph and will have the insurance policies endorsed, if necessary, to prevent invalidation of the insurance coverage. 4. Casualty/Total or Partial Destruction. a. If the Premises are damaged by casualty and Landlord elects to restore the Premises, Landlord will, at its expense, restore the Premises to substantially the same condition that existed before the casualty. If Landlord chooses to restore, Landlord will notify Tenant in writing of the estimated time to restore and give Tenant an option to terminate this Lease by notifying Landlord within ten (10) business days. If Tenant does not terminate this Lease, the Lease will continue and Landlord will restore the Premises. If Landlord fails to complete restoration within ninety (90) days from the date of written notification by Landlord to Tenant of Landlord’s election to repair the casualty, Tenant may terminate this Lease by written notice to Landlord. b. If Landlord elects not to restore the Premises, this Lease will terminate. 5. Condemnation/Substantial or Partial Taking. a. If the Premises cannot be used for the purpose contemplated by this Lease because of condemnation or purchase or deed in lieu of condemnation, this Lease will terminate. b. Whether or not any portion of the Premises is taken by condemnation or purchase or deed in lieu of condemnation, Tenant may elect to terminate this Lease if this Lease is fifty percent (50%) or more of the Premises is taken. c. If there is a condemnation or purchase in lieu of condemnation and this Lease is not terminated, the Rent payable during the unexpired portion of the Term will be adjusted as may be fair and reasonable. d. Tenant will have no claim to the condemnation award or proceeds in lieu of condemnation; however, Tenant may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, pursue a separate claim against the condemning authority or against the party taking by purchase or deed in lieu of condemnation for Tenant’s moving expenses, inconvenience, business interruption, depreciation, loss of leasehold estate, and/or similar loss in a proceeding independent of Landlord’s condemnation suit. 5 6. Default by Landlord/Events. Defaults by Landlord are (i) failing to comply with any provision of this Lease within ten (10) days after written notice and (ii) failing to provide Essential Services to Tenant within three (3) days after written notice. 7. Default by Landlord’s/Tenant Remedies. Tenant’s remedies for Landlord’s default are to sue for damages and/or equitable relief, and, if Landlord does not provide an Essential Service for thirty (30) days after written notice of default, Tenant may terminate this Lease and be released from any further obligations hereunder. 8. Default by Tenant/Events. Defaults by Tenant are (a) failing to pay timely Rent, (b) abandoning or vacating a substantial portion of the Premise, or (c) failing to comply within ten (10) days after written notice with any provision of this Lease other than the defaults set forth in (a) and (b) above. 9. Default by Tenant/Landlord’s Remedies. Landlord’s remedies for Tenant’s default are limited to the following: (a) enter and take possession of the Premises, after which Landlord may relet the Premises on behalf of Tenant and receive the Rent directly by reason of the reletting, at such time Tenant shall not have any further obligations under this Lease; (b) enter the Premises and perform Tenant’s obligations, resulting in Tenant being liable to Landlord for the cost incurred by Landlord to perform Tenant’s obligations; and (c) terminate this Lease by written notice to Tenant, thus releasing Tenant from any further obligations under this Lease. 10. Default/Waivers/mitigation. It is not a waiver of default if the non-defaulting party fails to declare immediately a default or delays in taking any action. Pursuit of any remedies set forth in this Lease does not preclude pursuit of other remedies in this Lease. Landlord and Tenant have a duty to mitigate damages. 11. Holdover. If Tenant does not vacate the Premises following termination of this Lease, Tenant will become a tenant from month-to-month at a Base Rent of $650.00 per month and either party may terminate this Lease upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party. 12. Alternative Dispute Resolution. Landlord and Tenant agree to mediate in good faith before filling a suit for damages. 13. Attorney’s Fees. If either party retains an attorney to enforce the Lease, the party prevailing in litigation is entitled to recover reasonable attorney’s fees and court and other costs. 14. Venue and Applicable Law. Venue is in Guadalupe County, Texas and this Lease shall be construed and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 15. Exhibits. The exhibits are incorporated herein as matters of contract as if set forth fully herein. 16. Entire Agreement. This Lease is the entire agreement of the parties as to the subject matter hereof, and there are no oral representations, warranties, agreements, or promises pertaining to this Lease not incorporated in writing in the Lease. 6 17. Amendment of Lease. This Lease may be amended only by an instrument in writing signed by Landlord and Tenant. 18. Limitation of Warranties. THERE ARE NO IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, OF FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, OR OF ANY OTHER KIND ARISING OUT OF THIS LEASE, AND THERE ARE NO WARRANTIES THAT EXTEND BEYOND THOSE EXPRESSLY STATED IN THIS LEASE. 19. Notices. Any notice required or permitted under this Lease must be in writing. Any notice required by this Lease will be deemed to be delivered (whether actually received or not) when deposited with the United States Postal Service, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, and addressed to the intended recipient at the address(es) shown in this Lease, which addresses may be changed from time to time. Notice may also be given by regular mail, personal delivery, courier delivery, facsimile transmission, or other commercially reasonable means and will be effective when actually received. Any addresses for notice may be changed by written notice delivered as provided herein. 20. Abandoned Property. Landlord hereby may retain, destroy, or dispose of any property of Tenant or other person left on the Premises at the end of the term of this Lease, including any renewals hereof. 21. Title. Landlord hereby represents and warrants that (i) it has good and indefeasible fee simple title to the Premises, (ii) has the full right and authority to make this Lease, and (iii) the Premises are free and clear of all contracts, agreements, encumbrances, or defects in title of any nature whatsoever, other than the matters created by or with the consent of Tenant, that would restrict or prevent the use or enjoyment by Tenant of the Premises or the rights or privileges granted under this Lease. 22. Headings. The descriptive headings of the paragraphs contained in the Lease are inserted for convenience only and shall not control, affect, limit, expand, or modify the meaning or construction of any of the provisions hereof. 23. Counterparts. The Lease may be executed in multiple counterparts, and such counterparts, when taken together, shall have the full force and effect of an original, fully executed instrument. 24. Invalidity. If one or more of the provisions hereof shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect under applicable law, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect any other provisions hereof, and this Lease shall be construed as is such invalid, illegal, or unenforceable provision had been contained herein. 25. Binding Effect. This Lease shall apply to and be binding on the heirs, successors, executors, administrators, and assigns of the Landlord and Tenant. 26. Extensions. Tenant shall have the option to extend this Lease, under the terms herein, upon written notice to Landlord given at lease forty-five (45) days prior to the then 7 applicable Termination Date, for one or more additional terms. Each additional term shall be twelve (12) months in duration. In no event shall the term of this Lease exceed five (5) years without the express written consent of the Landlord. 27. Termination. Either party may terminate this Lease with or without cause and without penalty prior to the Termination Date by providing ninety (90) days written notice to the other party of its intent to terminate this Lease. If the Lease is terminated pursuant to this Section, Tenant shall pay rent on a prorated basis through the termination date noted in the written termination notice. [The remainder of this page was left blank intentionally.] 8 This Commercial Lease Agreement is executed to be effective as the Effective Date. LANDLORD: TENANT: CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS A Texas Home-Rule Municipality The CHAMBER (Schertz-Cibolo-Selma Area) Steve Williams, City Manager Maggie Titterington, President 9 Exhibit A Legal Description of Property Agenda No. 5.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Fire Department Subject:Resolution 25-R-080 - Authorizing an application to FEMA for the Staffing Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program (S.Williams/G.Rodgers) BACKGROUND The Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program is a crucial federal initiative administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Purpose of the SAFER Program: Its primary objective is to help local fire departments increase and maintain adequate staffing levels. This is achieved by providing direct financial assistance to fire departments for two main purposes:  Hiring new Firefighters: This helps departments increase their operational capacity and meet growing community demands.  1. Recruiting and Retaining Volunteer Firefighters: This supports departments that rely on a volunteer or combination staffing model which does not apply to Schertz Fire Department.  2. Why is this important:  Enhancing Public Safety: Adequate staffing directly translates to faster response times, more effective incident management (Fire suppression, emergency medical services, technical rescue, hazardous materials response, wildfire operations, fire prevention, and emergency management), and ultimately, better protection for the lives and property of our residents. Ensuring Firefighter Safety: Properly staffed teams allow for safer operations, reducing the risk of injury or fatality to our firefighters, who are our most valuable assets.  Community Resilience: A well-staffed fire department is a cornerstone of a resilient community, capable of effectively responding to daily emergencies and large-scale disasters.  Fiscal Responsibility: The SAFER grant offers a significant opportunity to enhance our Fire Department's capabilities using federal funds, thereby reducing the direct financial burden on local taxpayers while still achieving critical public safety goals. It allows us to address staffing needs that might otherwise be challenging to fund solely through municipal budgets.  Meeting Growing Demands: As our community grows and develops, the demands on our emergency services increase. SAFER funding helps us keep pace with this growth and maintain high service delivery standards.  National Recognition / Best Practices: Applying for and potentially receiving a SAFER grant demonstrates our commitment to national best practices in emergency management and public safety.  In essence, the SAFER program is a vital federal resource that directly supports our local efforts to maintain a robust, safe, and effective fire and emergency response capability for our citizens.  GOAL The overarching goal of the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program is to enhance the ability of local fire departments to protect their communities from fire and fire-related hazards by increasing or maintaining the number of trained "front-line" Firefighters. More specifically, the SAFER program aims to:  Help communities meet industry minimum staffing standards: This often refers to standards set by organizations like the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA), such as NFPA 1710 (for career fire departments), which provide guidelines for effective staffing, response, and operational capabilties.  1. Attain 24-hour staffing: For many departments, SAFER funding helps ensure that there are enough personnel on duty around the clock to provide adequate protection and rapid response.  2. Improve emergency response capabilities: By increasing the number of Firefighters, departments can more effectively and safely respond to a wider range of emergencies, including fires, medical calls, hazardous materials incidents, and technical rescues.  3. Support Firefighters health and safety: Adequate staffing levels contribute to safer incident scenes by ensuring enough personnel for critical tasks and reducing the burden on individual Firefighters, thereby mitigating risks of injury or burnout.  4. Enhance the recruitment and retention of Firefighters: A significant portion of SAFER funds are specifically dedicated to developing and implementing programs that attract new personnel and keep existing ones.  5. COMMUNITY BENEFIT The SAFER Grant Program provides significant and measurable benefits directly to communities by enhancing the capabilities and effectiveness of their local fire departments. These benefits cascade down to individual citizens, leading to improved safety, protection, and overall well-being.  Here are the key community benefits of the SAFER Grant Program:  Improved Emergency Response Times and Capabilities:  Faster Response: Increased staffing levels, a primary goal of SAFER, directly lead to quicker response times for all types of emergencies, including fires, medical calls, and other incidents. This is crucial as every second counts in an emergency.  Adequate On-Scene Personnel: More Firefighters means more hands on deck immediately at an incident scene. This ensures that the department can meet National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) staffing standards (NFPA 1710 for career departments), allowing for safer and more effective operations (e.g., rapid fire attack, simultaneous search and rescue, and efficient patient care).  Enhanced Operational Efficiency: With sufficient personnel, department can deploy resources more strategically and perform complex tasks more efficiently, leading to better outcomes.  1. Increased Safety and Protection for Residents and Property:  Reduced Casualties and Injuries: Faster and more effective responses can significantly reduce the loss of life and injuries to civilians during emergencies.  Minimized Property Damage: Prompt and robust fire suppression efforts can limit the spread of fires, saving homes, businesses, and other valuable property from extensive damage.  Comprehensive Hazard Mitigation: Improved staffing means departments are better equipped to handle a broader range of hazards, from structure fires to hazardous materials 2. incidents and technical rescues, protecting the community from diverse threats. Fiscal Stability and Responsible Resource Management:  Reduced Burden on Local Taxpayers: SAFER grants provide federal funds that can covera significant portion of Firefighter salaries and benefits, preventing the need for our city to solely bear these costs. This is particularly beneficial for communities facing economic constraints or rapid growth.  Cost Savings in Overtime and Mutual Aid: Adequate staffing can reduce reliance on costly overtime hours for existing personnel and decrease the need for mutual aid from neighboring departments, thereby saving municipal funds.  Strategic Investment: The grants enable communities to make critical investments in their public safety in their public safety infrastructure without immediate, full impact on local budgets, allowing for better long-term financial planning.  3. Strengthened Community Engagement and Resilience:  Enhanced Recruitment and Retention: SAFER funds enable robust recruitment campaigns and retention incentives (e.g., training opportunities, small stipends, physical exams). This strengthens the department, which is vital for many communities.  Improved Community Well-Being: A strong, visible, and responsive fire department builds public trust and confidence, contributing to a sense of security and overall community well-being.  Greater Training and Readiness: SAFER funding can support advanced training opportunities for Firefighters, ensuring they have the most up-to-date skills and confidence to execute safer and more effective emergency operations.  4. The SAFER program directly translates federal investment into tangible local benefits, making communities safer, more secure, and more resilient in the face of emergencies.  SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends the City Manager be authorized to submit for and accept if awarded the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).  FISCAL IMPACT The total financial impact of this reimbursement grant is $1,979,647.20 over a 3-year period covering the new hire of firefighter salaries and fringe benefits with a projected cost savings of $1,220,782.43, which is the cost share of the federal government, leaving the city share to be $758,864.77 over this 3-year period.  Grant Total: $1,979,647.20  Federal Resources - $1,220,782.43 City Resources - $758,864.77 Grant Period: 3 years Number of Positions Funded: 6 Percentage of Salary / Benefits Covered by Grant:  Year 1 - 75% (Federal Share) - $494,911.80 and 25% (City Share) - $164,970.60 Year 2 - 75% (Federal Share) - $494,911.80 and 25% (City Share) - $164,970.60 Year 3 - 35% (Federal Share) - $230,958.83 and 65% (City Share) - $659,882.40 After the performance period of the grant, the city would then assume 100% of the salary and benefits associated with these positions. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends the City Manager by authorized to submit for and accept if awarded the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program administered by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA).  Attachments Resolution 25-R-080 SAFER Grant Program  RESOLUTION 25-R-080 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) STAFFING FOR ADEQUATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY RESPONSE (SAFER) GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Schertz Fire Department has a need to increase the number of trained personnel to ensure adequate fire and emergency response capabilities in our community; and WHEREAS, the Schertz Fire Department is committed to ensuring the highest level of public safety and emergency response for its residents; and WHEREAS,  the  Schertz  Fire  Department  plays  a  critical  and  indispensable  role  in providing fire suppression, emergency medical services, hazardous materials response, technical rescue operations, wild fire operations, fire prevention, and emergency management, essential to the well-being and security of our community; and WHEREAS, adequate staffing levels within the Schertz Fire Department are paramount to  maintaining  effective  response  times,  ensuring  Firefighter  safety,  and  providing comprehensive emergency services in a rapidly growing or evolving operational environment; and WHEREAS, the federal Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant  Program,  administered  by  the  U.S.  Department  of  Homeland  Security  (DHS)  and  the Federal  Emergency  Management  Agency  (FEMA),  provides  critical  financial  assistance  to eligible fire departments for the purpose of increasing or maintaining the number of trained, frontline firefighters; and WHEREAS, securing SAFER Grant funding would directly enable the City of Schertz to hire  six  additional  career  firefighters,  improve  firefighter  recruitment  and  retention  efforts, enhance overall operational capacity and community resilience without solely burdening local taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz recognizes the significant benefits of the SAFER Grant Program  in  supporting  local  fire  departments  and  is  committed  to  leveraging  all  available resources to enhance our emergency response capabilities. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1.The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to submit for and accept the Staffing for Adequate Fire and Emergency Response (SAFER) Grant Program not to exceed  the  amount  of ONE MILLION NINE HUNDRED AND SEVENTY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FOURTY EIGHT DOLLARS. ($1,979,648) during the FY26, FY27, and FY28. Section 2.The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a  part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3.All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4.This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance  shall  be  held  to  be  invalid,  the  remainder  of  this  Resolution  and  the application  of  such  provision  to  other  persons  and  circumstances  shall  nevertheless  be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6.It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject  matter  of  the  public  business  to  be  considered  at  such  meeting,  including  this Resolution,  was  given,  all  as  required  by  Chapter 551,  Texas  Government  Code,  as amended. Section 7.This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the 1st day of July, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Agenda No. 6.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Resolution 25-R-070 - Approving the Guadalupe Appraisal District Real Estate Acquisition and Renovation of 216 E College Street, Seguin, TX (Mayor/S.Williams) Attachments Estimated Project Funding Amounts of Taxing Units  Taxing Unit Request for Approval Packet  Resolution 25-R-070 Approval Guadalupe Appraisal District Real Estate Acquistion  Estimated Project Funding Amounts of Taxing Units Taxing Unit GAD Budget Allocation Probable Funding Requirement Tax Rate per $100 of Taxable Value Impact Statement Guadalupe County 20.61716% $ 182,509.45 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000734 This tax rate represents 0.07% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Schertz-Cibolo-U.C. ISD 20.00736% $ 177,111.27 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002457 This tax rate represents 0.25% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Seguin ISD 15.56632% $ 137,797.82 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002267 This tax rate represents 0.23% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Seguin, City 6.29898% $ 55,760.50 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001167 This tax rate represents 0.12% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. New Braunfels ISD 5.88018% $ 52,053.14 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002397 This tax rate represents 0.24% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Navarro ISD 5.83841% $ 51,683.42 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002381 This tax rate represents 0.24% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Schertz, City 5.53983% $ 49,040.24 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001206 This tax rate represents 0.12% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Cibolo, City 5.20226% $ 46,052.00 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001178 This tax rate represents 0.12% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Marion ISD 5.07129% $ 44,892.59 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002383 This tax rate represents 0.24% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Comal ISD 3.35424% $ 29,692.80 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002276 This tax rate represents 0.23% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. New Braunfels, City 2.69376% $ 23,846.03 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000993 This tax rate represents 0.10% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Estimated Project Funding Amounts of Taxing Units (cont.) Taxing Unit GAD Budget Allocation Probable Funding Requirement Tax Rate per $100 of Taxable Value Impact Statement San Marcos ISD 0.99320% $ 8,792.09 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002135 This tax rate represents 0.21% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Lake McQueeney WCID #1 0.60407% $ 5,347.44 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000760 This tax rate represents 0.08% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Lake Placid WCID #1 0.52380% $ 4,636.86 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002280 This tax rate represents 0.23% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. La Vernia ISD 0.38755% $ 3,430.69 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002218 This tax rate represents 0.22% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Selma, City 0.35378% $ 3,131.73 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000426 This tax rate represents 0.04% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Luling ISD 0.27765% $ 2,457.81 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001781 This tax rate represents 0.18% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Loan Oak Farm MUD 0.26365% $ 2,333.95 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001156 This tax rate represents 0.12% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Marion, City 0.13325% $ 1,179.56 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001062 This tax rate represents 0.11% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Prairie Lea ISD 0.10910% $ 965.78 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002001 This tax rate represents 0.20% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Lake Dunlap WCID 0.08160% $ 722.31 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000200 This tax rate represents 0.02% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Universal City, City 0.07843% $ 694.29 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001320 This tax rate represents 0.13% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Estimated Project Funding Amounts of Taxing Units (cont.) Taxing Unit GAD Budget Allocation Probable Funding Requirement Tax Rate per $100 of Taxable Value Impact Statement Santa Clara, City 0.03506% $ 310.39 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000374 This tax rate represents 0.04% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Meadow Lake WCID #1 0.02689% $ 238.07 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000272 This tax rate represents 0.03% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Nixon-Smiley CISD 0.02251% $ 199.27 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002407 This tax rate represents 0.24% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Luling, City 0.01105% $ 97.78 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000976 This tax rate represents 0.10% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. York Creek Water District 0.00934% $ 82.67 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000010 This tax rate represents 0.00% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Guadalupe County MUD #4 0.00877% $ 77.60 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000294 This tax rate represents 0.03% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. San Marcos, City 0.00480% $ 42.50 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.001653 This tax rate represents 0.17% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Sky Ranch MUD 0.00470% $ 41.60 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000770 This tax rate represents 0.08% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Guadalupe County MUD #9 0.00054% $ 4.78 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002832 This tax rate represents 0.28% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Guadalupe County MUD #6 0.00042% $ 3.76 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.000034 This tax rate represents 0.00% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Guadalupe County MUD #10 0.00006% $ 0.52 The tax rate per $100 of taxable value is approximately $0.002556 This tax rate represents 0.26% of one cent per $100 of taxable value. Guadalupe Appraisal District 3000 North Austin Street Seguin, Texas 78155 (830) 303-3313 Opt. 1 (830) 372-2874 (Fax) To the Honorable Governing Bodies of Guadalupe County Taxing Units, The Guadalupe Appraisal District Board of Directors (BOD) has adopted Resolution 2025-03 proposing the acquisition and renovation of the historic Mary B. Erskine Building located at 216 East College Street, Seguin, Texas, as the future headquarters of the Appraisal District. The property is under contract for $1,895,000, and a recent independent fee appraisal has established its market value at $1,960,000 as of March 24, 2025. This 39,273-square-foot structure originally built in 1914 and situated on a 4-acre block—offers a strategic and cost-effective opportunity to secure a permanent facility capable of serving Guadalupe County’s rapidly growing taxpayer base. As detailed in the attached Mary Erskine Building Assessment Report (dated May 6, 2025), the facility requires extensive renovation and modernization to be repurposed for government administration and public services. The total Probable Project Cost is estimated at $8,401,765, which includes design, construction, project management, contingency, and all associated costs necessary to bring the facility into full operational use. Pursuant to Section 6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code, this real estate acquisition and renovation project must be approved by the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of the appraisal district’s board of directors. Enclosed you will find: 1.The copy of adopted BOD Resolution 2025-03 (pg. 3) 2.A Resolution Template for formal adoption by your governing body (pg. 4) 3.The Mary Erskine Building Assessment Report (pg.5) 4.An addendum outlining alternate options considered (pg. 115) Please note: Each taxing unit’s share of the funding responsibility for this project will be proportionate to its respective percentage of the Guadalupe Appraisal District’s annual approved budget. This ensures equity in participation aligned with each entity's operational support level. Current budget allocation percentages are provided below signature block. Several taxing units have already scheduled time for the Chief Appraiser to provide a formal presentation. We are happy to accommodate any additional requests for briefings or discussions and encourage your office to contact us directly. Page 1 of 124 We respectfully request that this item be placed on your next available agenda for consideration. In accordance with Section 6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code, the approval resolution must be returned to the Guadalupe Appraisal District within 30 days from the date this request is formally presented to your governing body at a posted public meeting. Thank you for your attention to this matter and for your continued support of the Guadalupe Appraisal District’s mission to serve the taxpayers and taxing units of our community. Sincerely, Peter Snaddon, R.P.A., C.C.A. Chief Appraiser Guadalupe Appraisal District Current Budget Allocation Breakdown Taxing Unit Name Allocation % Guadalupe County 20.61716% Schertz-Cibolo UC ISD 20.00736% Seguin ISD 15.56632% City of Seguin 6.29898% New Braunfels ISD 5.88018% Navarro ISD 5.83841% City of Schertz 5.53983% City of Cibolo 5.20226% Marion ISD 5.07129% Comal ISD 3.35424% City of New Braunfels 2.69376% San Marcos ISD 0.99320% Lake McQueeney WCID #1 0.60407% Lake Placid WCID #1 0.52380% LaVernia ISD 0.38755% City of Selma 0.35378% Luling ISD 0.27765% Taxing Unit Name Allocation % Lone Oak MUD 0.26365% City of Marion 0.13325% Prairie Lea ISD 0.10910% Lake Dunlap WCID 0.08160% City of Universal City 0.07843% City of Santa Clara 0.03506% Meadow Lake WCID #1 0.02689% Nixon-Smiley ISD 0.02251% City of Luling 0.01105% York Creek Water Dist. 0.00934% Guadalupe County MUD#4 0.00877% City of San Marcos 0.00480% Sky Ranch MUD* 0.00470% Guadalupe County MUD #9* 0.00054% Guadalupe County MUD06* 0.00042% Guadalupe County MUD10* 0.00006% 100.00% *Ineligible Tax Units: TX Tax Code §6.051(b) The acquisition or conveyance of real property or the construction or renovation of a building or other improvement by an appraisal district must be approved by the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of board members. Page 2 of 124 Guadalupe Appraisal District RESOLUTION 2025-03 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT REGARDING THE ACQUISITION AND RENOVATION OF 216 E. COLLEGE STREET, SEGUIN, TEXAS, AS THE FUTURE SITE FOR APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS WHEREAS, the current location of the Guadalupe Appraisal District is no longer adequate in size or functional utility to meet the needs of the taxing units and taxpayers; and WHEREAS, the property located at 216 E. College Street, Seguin, Texas, has been identified as a suitable location that provides adequate space to meet these needs; and WHEREAS, Section 6.051 of the Texas. Property Tax Code authorizes the Board of Directors of an appraisal district to purchase or lease real property and to construct or renovate improvements as necessary to establish and operate the appraisal office; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT: 1.Approval of Acquisition and Renovation: The Board of Directors hereby approves the acquisition and renovatipn of the property located at 216 E. College Street, Seguin, Texas, for use as the future site of the Guadalupe Appraisal District operations. 2.Notification and Approval: The Chief Appraiser is directed to notify the presiding officer of each governing body entitled to vote on the approval of this proposal, as required by Section 6.051 of the Texas Property Tax Code. The notification shall include a copy of this resolution and information showing the costs of other available alternatives to the proposal. 3.Implementation: Upon receiving the necessary approvals from the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of board members, the Chief Appraiser is authorized to proceed with the acquisition and renovation of the property. 4.Effective Date: This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND APPROVED this 7th day of May 2025. ATTEST: � -� � •f � � \ . Daryl John, Secretary G.A.D. Board of Directors Page 3 of 124 RESOLUTION NO. APPROVAL OF GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION AND RENOVATION OF 216 E. COLLEGE STREET IN SEGUIN, TEXAS AS FUTURE SITE FOR APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS WHEREAS, the Texas Property Tax Code, Section 6.051, permits an appraisal district to acquire real property by purchase or lease, convey real property, and construct or renovate buildings or other improvements for the purpose of establishing and operating an appraisal office or branch appraisal office; and WHEREAS, Section 6.051 requires that the board of directors of an appraisal district propose the property transaction by resolution, which must be approved by the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of board members; and WHEREAS, the governing body of [Taxing Unit Name] received notification of the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District as required by Section 6.051; and WHEREAS, the purchase and renovation of the proposed real estate offers the most effective solution to provide the Guadalupe Appraisal District with a permanent location to serve the taxing units and taxpayers of Guadalupe County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that on this date, the [Governing Body] of the [Taxing Unit Name]: 1.Approval of Acquisition and Renovation: The [Governing Body] hereby approves by a majority vote in a public meeting the purchase and renovation project of a building for the Guadalupe Appraisal District's office situated in Guadalupe County, Texas, at 216 E. College Street in Seguin, Texas, as described in approved Resolution 2025-03 of the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District. 2.Allocation of Proceeds from Sale of Existing Office: Any proceeds from the sale of the existing office of the Guadalupe Appraisal District located at 3000 N. Austin Street in Seguin, Texas be allocated to the Guadalupe Appraisal District's dedicated reserve fund for future payments towards the proposed building purchase and renovations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document be filed with the Chief Appraiser of the Guadalupe Appraisal District on or before the 30th day after receipt of notification of the aforementioned resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this day of [Month] 2025. [Name] [Title] ATTEST: [Name] [Title] Page 4 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE GUADALUPE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT MAY 6, 2025 INTERIM REVIEW / CONCEPT DESIGN. NOT INTENDED FOR BIDDING, PERMITTING OR CONSTRUCTION. DEBRA J. DOCKERY, TEXAS ARCHITECT REGISTRATION #11930. Page 5 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT FOR THE GUADALUPE COUNTY APPRAISAL DISTRICT MAY 6, 2025 TABLE OF CONTENTS A.Project Introduction B.Existing Conditions Description C.Renovation Space Program Goals D.Observations and Description of the Proposed Scope of Work E.Space Needs Program F.Building Code and Zoning Code Analysis G.Architectural Systems Description H.Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing Assessment I.Opinion of Probable Construction Cost and Phasing Opportunities J.Drawings Existing First Floor Plan Existing Second / Main Floor Plan Existing Third Floor Plan Concept Improvements Site Plan Concept Improvements First Floor Plan Concept Improvements Second / Main Floor Plan Concept Improvements Third Floor Plan K.References Site Survey Appraiser Area Calculations Asbestos Containing Materials Report Elevator Assessment Plumbing Lines Camera Results Prepared by: Debra J. Dockery, Architect, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, Texas 78205 (210) 225-6130 With Calculated Legacy Consulting Engineers, MEP Engineer Page 6 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT PROJECT INFORMATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS Page 7 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT SEGUIN, TEXAS Project Introduction The Mary Erskine Building in Seguin, Texas was initially constructed in 1914 for the Seguin Independent School District High School. In subsequent years, the building became an elementary campus and then a vocational/technical school. More recently the building was acquired by a private investor. The Guadalupe County Appraisal District is considering purchasing the building to relocate its Seguin Headquarters. The agency has outgrown the current facilities and expansion opportunities in the present location are limited. Debra J. Dockery, Architect, P.C. was contracted to provide this assessment of the improvements needed to accommodate the Appraisal District offices should the purchase move forward. The site is a full 4-acre block in the downtown area of Seguin. The original 1914 building is three stories and comprised of former classrooms and offices. Later additions to the campus include a single-story classroom building, a band hall, and combination gymnasium, auditorium with stage, cafeteria and kitchen building. The site currently has 32 parking spaces in a paved lot on the east side and 18 parking spaces on the north. There is a concrete paved basketball court, abandoned swing sets, and evidence of a former athletic track. The design team was tasked with developing a space program that reflects the actual space needs and adjacencies for each department and developing interior reorganization floor plans that provide a concept for the occupancy by the Appraisal District. This assessment focused on the original three-story building as the facility the Appraisal District would occupy first. An evaluation of existing mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems was conducted to determine repairs necessary to reoccupy the building. A building code analysis and disabled accessibility review were prepared to determine needed upgrades. Existing Conditions Area* Main Building Ground Floor 9,060 SF Main Building Second / Main Floor 8,910 SF Main Building Third Flor 8,910 SF 26,880 SF Single Story Classroom & Band Hall 4,231 SF Gymnasium/Cafeteria 8,162 SF Total For Campus 39,273 SF *Areas provided by Guadalupe Appraisal District Page 8 of 124 Date Constructed Original section - 1914. Additions - assumed 1960’s. Construction Concrete foundations, (first floor of Main Building is partially below grade), concrete framed columns, beams, floor, roof and stair structure, brick veneer on masonry walls, interior plaster and gypsum board walls, original wood flooring in most rooms, suspended acoustical ceilings retrofitted when the building received air conditioning. Renovation Program Goals •Designate a main public entrance and public service window near public parking and accessible to elevator. •Provide consolidated public support areas (research and map room, public restrooms, meeting room. •Relocate departments with public service functions to be conveniently located near the main entrance. •Designate rooms for Appraisal Review Board (ARB) hearings that can be separated from the rest of the building with separate restrooms and waiting areas. •Provide Appraiser work stations grouped by appraisal type. •Centrally locate staff breakroom and restrooms for efficient and convenient access by all staff. •Secure staff areas from public access areas. •Review security aspects and improvements •Provide budget recommendations for needed systems replacements and upgrades. •Upgrade finishes and systems for a modern appearance. •Investigate energy saving upgrades such as LED lighting. •Consider immediate space needs and near future projected growth Observations and Description of Proposed Scope of Work General 1.Most existing interior walls may remain in the proposed interior reorganization. 2.For many areas where the existing door does not have required ADA clearance, the door may be removed as the spaces become open work stations. 3.There are existing restrooms on the First Floor. The recommendation is to completely remove all fixtures and finishes and replace with a new layout meeting ADA and public accommodation. 4. There are no restrooms on the Second Floor. As this floor will be the main public entry, it is proposed to add restrooms matching the first floor layout below for ease in stacking plumbing piping. 5.The restrooms on the Third Floor will be primarily for staff. These restrooms have ADA Page 9 of 124 compliance issues which may be addressed in a renovation. 6.Staff areas are consolidated and secured from public access on the First and Second Floors by walls separating the corridor and with controlled access doors. 7.The building has been retrofitted with a fire sprinkler system. 8.The HVAC systems, and the internal building power and lighting, telecommunications infrastructure and plumbing systems will be replaced. Service entries appear adequate for the renovation. 9.The elevator was inspected by a third party contacted by the Guadalupe Appraisal District. There are some issues to be addressed. See separate elevator assessment report. 10.The most recent asbestos report conducted in 2021 lists asbestos containing material in the window and door caulk and in vinyl composition tile. However, the location of the vinyl tile and the quantities in the report do not match the actual on-site observations. Perhaps some material has been removed since 2021. The previous asbestos report in 2018 listed asbestos containing material for duct work caulking and in duct work vibration dampers. It does not appear these materials have been removed since the 2018 report. For this report, it is assumed asbestos abatement will be required if any vinyl floor tile is removed, any windows are replaced, or any ducts with caulking are removed. Should the Guadalupe Appraisal District proceed with the purchase of this building, it is recommended the testing for asbestos be conducted again to determine conclusively the extent of any asbestos containing material. 11.A previous assessment report conducted in 2018 noted water damage from roof leaks. The report was not specific to the areas damaged. No evidence of substantial water damage was observed. Only isolated areas of stained ceiling tiles were noted and these areas may have been the result of air conditioning condensate leaks. It was reported by the current building owner that the roofing system on the three story building was recently replaced. Aerial photos indicate the roofing is likely a TPO system and it does appear to be recent. 12.Camera investigation of plumbing lines from the first floor restrooms to the service mains or meters was recommended. The results of these investigations are attached. Most water and sewer piping within the building will be replaced with the expected reorganization of restrooms and breakrooms. The lines outside the building have collapsed, most notably at the clean-outs. The amount of damage from the clean-outs did not allow the camera to survey the entire length of the piping to determine the extent of the damage. This report assumes the entire length of the sewer and water piping from the building to the City of Seguin mains will need to be replaced. Page 10 of 124 Single Story Classroom Building A full assessment of the single story classroom building was not conducted with this report as the Guadalupe Appraisal District does not have immediate plans to occupy this building. General observations noted include: Rotted wood roof framing Roofing needs replacement Mechanical systems need replacement Restrooms could not be viewed but are assumed to need significant renovation Electrical lighting needs replacement Floor tile may be asbestos containing Ceilings and finishes need replacement Gymnasium and Cafeteria Building A full assessment of the Gymnasium and Cafeteria building was also not conducted with this report. The Guadalupe Appraisal District does not have immediate plans to occupy this building but has considered that the gym may be rented to community groups. Observations include: There are no restrooms in this building. If the space were rented to outside groups, alternate provisions would be required. Metal roofing needs to be coated or replaced Mechanical systems need replacement Lighting systems need to be replaced The gym floor is concrete. A suitable court flooring may be considered in the future There are no basketball goals currently in place The space includes a platform stage with ornate plaster work All appliances in the former kitchen have been removed and utility connections capped or abandoned. Recommended Scope of Work for Main Building Site Work The front entry curb ramp and door landings exceed the maximum slopes for ADA Many areas of the concrete sidewalks to the building are cracked, spalled and uneven Rework concrete front entry steps for compliant entry Additional parking will need to be constructed. Approximately 30 spaces may be retrofitted on the existing concrete paved basketball court. An additional 25 to 30 parking spaces will be needed to meet City of Seguin ordinances. Remove abandoned swing sets and other playground equipment. Improve site lighting for better security. New mechanical systems will require additional outdoor areas with concrete pads and better security fencing. Existing roof downspouts drain across public sidewalks which can cause slippery, unsafe conditions. Consider installing sidewalk trench drains to divert drainage to grassy areas. Page 11 of 124 Consider securing the one-story building and gymnasium building with more substantial fencing Consider landscape improvements including sod repair, tree trimming, additional trees and shrubs. Exterior – Main Building Clean brick and stone Provide minor repointing of brick (repair noted in limited areas) Repaint sheet metal work (downspouts, roof trims) Consider replacing the existing windows with insulated units to reduce HVAC loads and provide better occupant comfort If a new HVAC chiller / boiler central plant is installed, remove ground floor roof-top a/c, and replace this roofing. (The main roofing is reported to be recently replaced. No leaks were detected and aerial photos seem to confirm the Main Building roof is more recent.) Interior – Main Building The following ADA issues were noted: Stair handrails are not compliant Many interior doors lack the required clearance of the push and pull side of the door All restrooms have various non-compliant issues, but the recommended scope is to completely renovate all restrooms and add restrooms at the Second Level. Replace all suspended ceilings with 2 x 2 acoustical lay-in systems. (This is necessary for HVAC and Electrical lighting replacement.) Refinish wood floors Repaint entire interior Provide new interior walls as shown in the concept floor plans Some cracks were noted at the front entry stairs in the joint between the structural concrete stair framing and the infill wall below. These appear to be cracks caused by differential movement of different materials. Summary of Existing Building Systems Foundation – assumed concrete pier and beam Superstructure – concrete frame, columns, beams, flat floor plates Stairs – concrete framed Exterior walls – brick veneer and masonry back up (possibly structural clay tile) Interior walls – assumed plaster on lath, gypsum board on studs Flooring – wood flooring, vct, terrazzo in restrooms Ceilings – suspended 2 x 4 retrofitted Page 12 of 124 Page 13 of 124 Page 14 of 124 Page 15 of 124 Page 16 of 124 Page 17 of 124 Page 18 of 124 Page 19 of 124 Page 20 of 124 Page 21 of 124 Page 22 of 124 Page 23 of 124 Page 24 of 124 Page 25 of 124 Page 26 of 124 Page 27 of 124 Page 28 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM Page 29 of 124 DEBRA J. DOCKERY, ARCHITECT, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, Texas 78205 tel: (210) 225-6130 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM FOR POSSIBLE RELOCATION TO 216 E. COLLEGE Updated 4.29.2025 SPACES Department/ Spaces No. Min Size ASF COMMENTS of Space ASF SECOND FLOOR MAIN LEVEL Reception space / lobby - 30 x 24 1 720 720 double size of exist. Add kiosks Public service counter - 5 x 30 1 150 150 5 windows of which 2 ADA Public service staff work stations, 7x30 5 210 1050 part of service counter Public work room 1 600 600 computer terminals for 10, maps, kiosks, 1 work station Public restrooms men, women 2 200 400 Public family restroom 1 65 65 Pubic lactation room 1 65 65 Large conference room for up to 50 1 700 700 locate on Main Level, will also be Board Room Breakroom / kichenette, seating 15 - 20 1 500 500 Maybe 1 breakrm on ea level Work Room, mail room, supplies 1 250 250 ADMINISTRATION Director of Administration 1 180 180 Administration work stations 7 65 455 Mapping work stations with printer 2 100 200 IT work station 1 100 100 Mechanical 1 250 250 Electrical 1 60 60 MDF and IDF data rooms 1 100 100 Janitor 1 80 80 NET TO GROSS MAIN LEVEL 5,925 Walls, Hallways, Stairs, Structure 2,985 TOTAL GSF MAIN LEVEL 8,910 LOWER LEVEL ARB CENTER ARB check-in 1 200 200 ARB lobby / waiting area 1 400 400 ARB hearing rooms 2 660 1320 p room for 20 to 30 persons ARB level office for tax liasion 1 190 190 ARB breakroom 1 400 400 ARB file storage 1 300 300 Page 1 Page 30 of 124 ARB level men and women restrooms 2 250 500 ARB level family restroom 1 65 65 ARB level lactation room 1 65 65 Training Room 1 660 660 Fitness Center 1 770 770 Mechanical 1 400 400 Electrical 1 100 100 MDF and IDF data rooms 1 300 300 Janitor 1 80 80 Future office for facilities manager 1 190 190 General building storage 1 300 300 NET TO GROSS LOWER LEVEL 6,240 Walls, Hallways, Stairs, Structure, etc. 45%2,820 TOTAL GSF LOWER LEVEL 9,060 UPPER LEVEL OFFICES AND WORK STATIONS APPRAISERS Chief Appraiser Office 1 210 210 Deputy Chief Appraiser Office 1 180 180 Appraiser work stations - residential 9 65 585 Appraiser work stations - complex 5 65 325 Appraiser work stations - commercial 4 65 260 Appraiser Work Stations - agriculture 2 65 130 Appraiser work station - land 1 65 65 HUMAN RESOURCES Offices 3 160 480 Lobby 1 120 120 Medium conference room for 15 to 20 1 660 660 Small conference room for 5 to 10 1 300 300 Collaboration break out rooms for 2 to 4 3 80 240 Breakroom / kitchenette, 15 - 20 1 600 600 Staff men and women restrooms 2 200 400 Staff family restroom 1 200 200 Staff lactation room 1 65 65 Staff shower rooms 2 80 160 Mechanical 1 250 250 Electrical 1 60 60 MDF and IDF data rooms 1 100 100 Janitor 1 80 80 NET TO GROSS UPPER LEVEL 5,470 Walls, Hallways, Stairs, Structure, etc. 45%3,440 TOTAL GSF UPPER LEVEL 8,910 TOTAL FOR BUILDING 26,880 Page 2 Page 31 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT BUILDING CODE AND ZONING CODE ANALYSIS Page 32 of 124 Building Code and Zoning Code Analysis Authority with Jurisdiction: City of Seguin, Texas Current adopted codes: International Building Codes 2018, International Fire Code 2018, (Per City of Seguin website) International Energy Conservation Code 2018 Note: The City of Sequin Building Department was contacted to determine if updating to more current editions of the codes were being considered. The Department has not responded. Occupancy Type Current Group E Educational Proposed Conversion Group B Civic Administration Occupancy Separation Under occupancy Group E there were no requirements for occupancy separation. Any assembly spaces in the conversion to Group B with more than 50 occupants or more than 750 square feet will be classified as Group A-3, per 303.1.2 Construction Type Type II-B Non-combustible Fire Sprinkler Currently Yes Analysis based on Group B Occupancy Area Actual Allowable (with fire sprinkler) Main Building Area 26,880 SF Total Area all buildings 39,273 SF 90,000 SF Stories Actual - 3 Allowed- 3 Height Actual 18 FT Allowed - 55 FT Fire Resistance Fire Resistance Ratings for Building Elements - 0 hours Fire Resistance Ratings, Exterior, greater 30 FT Fire Separation - 0 hours The Main Building is fire sprinklered, therefore, 1 hour fire rated exit corridors are not required. (Corridors in non-fire sprinklered Occupancy Group B buildings are required to have 1 hour fire rated construction with 1/3 hour rated doors when the occupant load is more than 30.) Occupant Load Based on Assumed Interior Reorganization of Spaces Spaces Area Occupant Factor Occupant Load First Floor Meeting/Conference Rooms 2,100 SF 15 net 140 Waiting Areas 600 SF 15 net 40 Breakroom 600 SF 15 net 40 Health and Fitness Room 760 SF 50 gross 15 Offices 380 SF 150 gross 3 Page 33 of 124 Storage /Mech 500 SF 300 gross 2 First Floor Total Occupancy ` 240 Spaces Area Occupant Factor Occupant Load Second Floor Meeting/Conference Rooms 670 SF 15 net 45 Waiting Areas 300 SF 15 net 20 Breakroom 600 SF 15 net 40 Offices 3,880 SF 150 gross 26 Storage /Mech 300 SF 300 gross 1 Second Floor Total Occupancy ` 132 Spaces Area Occupant Factor Occupant Load Third Floor Meeting/Conference Rooms 670 SF 15 net 45 Breakroom 600 SF 15 net 40 Offices 3,800 SF 150 gross 26 Storage /Mech 300 SF 300 gross 1 Third Floor Total Occupancy ` 112 Total Building Occupants 484 Exit Requirements Egress sizing – stairways First Floor: 240 occupants / 2 stairs * 0.30 inches = 36 inches minimum, Actual = 62” Second Floor: 132 occupants + ½ first floor and third floor / 2 stairs * 0.30 inches = 154 *0.3 = 46”. Actual 62” Third Floor: 112 occupants / 2 stairs * 0.30 inches = 17 inches minimum, Actual = 62” Egress sizing – exit ways: First Floor 240 occupants *0.2 inches – 48 inches total exit width. Actual 124” Corridor minimum width: 44”. Actual – 44 “ hallway to elevator Plumbing fixture requirements - 2018 IBC Business Water Closets: 1 per 25 for first 50, then 1 for each 50 thereafter Lavatories: 1 per 40 for first 80, then 1 for each 80 thereafter Assume 242 women and 242 men Fixtures required: Women- 6 water closets, 5 lavatories Men – 6 water closets / urinals, 5 lavatories Page 34 of 124 (For comparison, Assembly spaces without permanent seating require 1 water closet per 125 men, 1 water closet per 65 women and 1 lavatory per 200 persons.) City of Seguin Unified Development Code Parking requirements – Main Building Only Offices - 1 space per each 300 GSF 26,880 / 300 = 90 parking spaces min Actual existing – 32 adjacent to Main Building Revise existing outdoor basketball court for parking - +/-30 parking spaces 90 required spaces – 62 existing / renovated = 28 spaces short of requirements (Note: 18 parking spaces exist along the north property but these would serve the gymnasium and one-story classroom building. 12,393 sf/ 300 = 41 parking stalls needed for these facilities) Page 35 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT ARCHITECTURAL SYSTEMS DESCRIPTION Page 36 of 124 Architectural Systems Descriptions Division 1 - General Requirements 011000 Summary of Work Project information, access to site, work restrictions, and miscellaneous provisions 012100 Allowances Allowance fund for unforeseen conditions, utility connection charges, and other items not known at time of bidding. An amount has not been stipulated at this time. 012300 Alternates Additive Bid Alternates separately priced on proposal form. No alternate items identified at this phase. Division 2 - Existing Conditions 024110 Selective Demolition Removal of existing installations for new work. Division 3 - Concrete 033000 Cast-in-place Concrete Repair of existing foundations for new plumbing work. Division 4 - Masonry 042000 Unit Masonry Repair of existing masonry for new work. Division 5 - Metals 055000 Metal Fabrications Miscellaneous steel supports and trims, lintel angles, fabricated steel items. Division 6 - Woods & Plastics 061000 Rough Carpentry Blocking and backing in walls for support of cabinetry, toilet accessories and miscellaneous specialties. 062023 Interior Finish Carpentry Interior wood trims 064116 Plastic Laminate Faced Architectural Casework Page 37 of 124 Plastic laminate faced cabinetry and solid surface countertops in breakrooms. 064661 Simulated Stone Countertops Homogenous solid plastic resin countertops, ½” thick material on plywood sub-top, with ½” thick backsplashes of same material for cabinetry countertops and restroom lavatory counters. Division 7 - Thermal & Moisture Protection 072100 Thermal Insulation Glass fiber sound attenuation insulation at new interior walls and ceilings. 076200 Sheet Metal Flashing Roof and wall flashings and other sheet metal trims requiring repair. 079000 Joint Sealants Elastomeric sealants and fillers for interior joints. Division 8 - Doors & Windows 081113 Metal Doors and Frames Hollow metal interior door frames for use with wood interior doors 081416 Flush Wood Doors Solid wood doors for all interior doors. For use in hollow metal door frames 083350 Access Doors Wall and ceiling access doors for plumbing chases and mechanical equipment 085000 Aluminum Windows Replace existing aluminum windows with new commercial grade fixed aluminum windows with same mullion profile. 085653 Transaction windows Impact and bullet resistant glass with transaction tray, speak hole and microphone for public service window. 087100 Door Hardware Lock system, exit devices, closers, stops, holders, thresholds, weatherstripping, and miscellaneous finish hardware items. Card readers at entry doors. Electronic locks for telecom rooms. 088800 Glazing New double pane insulated glass for replacement exterior windows. Page 38 of 124 Division 9 - Finishes 092216 Non-Structural Metal Framing Metal stud interior wall framing, 3-5/8” and 6”, 12 to 20-gauge studs depending on wall height, bridging, and bracing requirements. 092900 Gypsum Drywall Systems Gypsum board for interior partitions and restroom ceiling systems, sheathing for exterior walls. 093000 Tile Unglazed porcelain ceramic floor tile for restroom facilities. Full height glazed ceramic wall tile for restrooms. 095113 Acoustical Panel Ceilings Suspended acoustical ceiling systems consisting of 2' X 2' U.L. labeled, mineral composition board tiles in pre-finished steel grid, mylar or vinyl faced for breakroom. All renovated areas to receive new ceiling system. 096500 Resilient Flooring & Accessories LVT (luxury vinyl tile) with rubber base for all spaces that do not have existing wood flooring. 099100 Painting Painting and finishing requirements for non-factory-finished interior surfaces, for new surfaces and renovated existing services. Refinish existing wood floors. Division 10 - Specialties 101419 Dimensional Letter Signage Cast aluminum numbers and letters for exterior application, name, and address of facility. 101423 Panel Signage Acrylic panel room identification and accessibility signs 101426 Directional Signage Post mounted panels or wall mounted panels with directional and information signage. 102800 Toilet, Bath, and Laundry Accessories Electric hand dryers, soap, towel, and tissue dispensers, grab bars, and waste receptacles matching Owner’s product requirements. 104413 Fire Protection Specialties Fire extinguishers in semi-recessed cabinets in corridors and where required by fire codes, “Knox” box at exterior doors. Page 39 of 124 Division 11 - Equipment 114520 Kitchen Equipment Refrigerators and microwave ovens in breakroom by Owner. Division 12 - Furnishings 122113 Horizontal Louver Blinds Aluminum mini-blinds or roller shades for all windows See MEP Assessment for mechanical, electrical and plumbing systems assessment and recommendations. Page 40 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL & PLUMBING ASSESSMENT Page 41 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING MEP ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR DEBRA J. DOCKERY, ARCHITECT, P.C. Report April 2025 CLCE Project # 25-022 Prepared For: Debra J. Dockery, Architect, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, TX 78205 Prepared by: Manny Alvarez, PE Wesley McDaniel, PE CL Consulting Engineers, LLC. 7700 Torino, Suite 120 San Antonio, TX 78229 210.614.1110 Texas Registered Engineering Firm F-24898 Page 42 of 124 Executive Summary The Mary Erskine building in Seguin, Texas is a three-story 22,000 square foot facility that previously functioned as a primary school. The facility was constructed in 1914, and has seen some mechanical, electrical and plumbing updates over the years. The HVAC for the first floor is served by five split systems, and the second and third floors are served by four packaged rooftop units. There is plumbing to support restrooms on the first and third floors, as well as limited fixtures in the rest of the building such as a teacher break room, nurse’s office, and art room. The building appears to be fully sprinkled, with a fire department connection on the north side of the building. Many of the HVAC equipment has missing or damaged components and are not compatible with the most current refrigerants. Most of the ductwork, above-ceiling equipment, and fans were not able to be safely accessed for observation. Air devices such as supply diffusers and exhaust grilles were in varying condition, with many appearing damaged. Plumbing within the walls was not able to be observed, however pipes that were visible appeared in good shape. Heating and cooling load calculations were performed to ensure the installed HVAC systems are sufficiently sized for the application. The results are provided in Appendix A of this report. The first floor’s HVAC system is and comprised of five DX split systems utilizing outdoor air conditioners and vertical indoor air handlers with gas heat. Each air handler was marked as serving multiple rooms, and each classroom had a thermostat in it, suggesting there was a zone damper that allowed the classrooms to adjust cooling and heating per room. A controls cabinet for the five split systems was found in the basement mechanical room. The second and third floors are both served by two packaged DX rooftop units, for a total of 4 rooftop units. There did not appear to be any centralized control system for the packaged units, so it is assumed that each individual classroom zone is operating independently and the packaged unit is only controlling on duct pressure and discharge temperature. The plumbing fixtures on the first and third floor vary in size and condition. While lavatories are serviceable, the water closets and urinals are recommended to be replaced to full adult sizes and to be ADA compliant. There are electric hot water heaters at each floor that appear to be missing parts or wiring. Based on observations of the site, it is recommended that the entire mechanical system be replaced with new equipment, ductwork, insulation, controls, and air devices. It is also recommended to replace all plumbing fixtures to full-sized ADA compliant fixtures and to add men’s and women’s gang restrooms to the second floor. Electrically, the building is served by a 208Y/120V 500kVA utility transformer, which is likely to be sufficient for the renovation. The electrical distribution equipment appears to be dated from 1990 to 2000. The main switchboard was unable to be opened during the site visit. Based on the age of the equipment, it is recommended to replace the electrical distribution equipment and feeders. The new layout of the building and HVAC renovations will also likely require a reconfiguration of the distribution system. Additionally, this will allow for a more efficient electrical design that requires fewer pieces of equipment that can be consolidated to one area, instead of placed throughout the facility. Page 43 of 124 Lighting appeared to be fluorescent. It is recommended to replace all fixtures with LED lighting to improve the lighting quality and power efficiency of the building. The lighting controls will also need to be brought up to current energy code during in rework of the existing lighting system. Limitations This report is based upon observations of the visible and apparent conditions of the HVAC systems during a limited visit and limited drawings furnished to our office. While care has been taken in the reporting of the observations, the observations contained in this report are of a limited nature. Thus, no warranty or guarantee is expressed or implied in this report with respect to the installation or performance of the equipment. No sampling or testing was performed. Equipment on roofs, scaffolding, above the ceiling or anywhere else that was not safe to access were not inspected. The recommendations expressed are based on the opinions of CL Consulting Engineers, LLC. and are not intended as a critique of the original engineering design. Factors affecting original design decisions, including budget limitations, construction constraints, and owner design input, are not reviewed. Condition Terms Used Throughout the report, the terms good, fair, and poor are used to describe equipment. Where these terms are used, they are intended to be understood as follows - equipment in good condition is not expected to require replacement in the next ten years, equipment in fair condition should be anticipated to require replacement within the next five years, and equipment in poor condition shows signs of malfunction or disrepair and should be replaced as soon as possible. Observations Classrooms Mechanical The air devices in the classroom were of varying conditions and layouts, with many being dented or otherwise weathered. Each classroom had a wall-mounted thermostat. Due to the equipment being disassembled it was not possible to verify if the existing ductwork and air balance was sufficient for each room. Electrical The devices appear dated. Some devices appear to have been added at a later date, and have surface mounted raceway providing power to the receptacles. There is an isolated grounding system in place for some of the receptacles. This can be left intact, but is not required. Optionally, the devices and face plates can be replaced and the raceways moved to inside the walls to freshen up the space. Restrooms Mechanical The air devices in the restrooms were of varying conditions and layouts, with many being dented or otherwise weathered. Due to the equipment being disassembled it was not possible to verify if the existing supply or exhaust airflows were sufficient. Plumbing Page 44 of 124 The piping behind the walls or underneath the floor were not able to be observed . It is not known the condition of the domestic water pipe or the sanitary sewer pipe in those locations. The piping that was exposed to feed the fixtures looked to be in good condition. Some lavatories had only cold water service and some had cold and hot water. The lavatory and faucets looked outdated and not ADA compliant. The water closets and urinals were in poor to fair condition. However, many were not sized for adults. The fixtures also were not ADA compliant. Electrical The devices appear dated. Optionally, the devices and face plates can be replaced to freshen up the space. Corridors/Stairwells Mechanical The air devices in the corridors were of varying conditions and layouts, with many being dented or otherwise weathered. It was not clear how these spaces were zoned or what equipment it shared with other spaces. Plumbing Drinking fountains were observed on each floor. These were in poor condition and were not ADA compliant. No split level fountains or bottle fillers were found. Electrical The devices appear dated. Optionally, the devices and face plates can be replaced to freshen up the space. Air Conditioning Systems DX Split Systems The five DX split systems serving the first floor are comprised of residential-grade indoor air handling units in vertical configuration with natural gas heat paired with an outdoor air conditioner. The nameplates of the air handlers were not accessible to read, however based on the outdoor air conditioner the units appear to be manufactured in 1991. The units are charged with refrigerant R-22, which is no longer permitted to sold in new equipment and is increasingly hard to service. Indoor Air Handling Units The five indoor air handling units serving the first floor spaces are all located in a mechanical room and mounted on a wooden platform that also serves as a plenum for return air and outside air to mix before the inlet of the air handling units. An outside air duct is routed from outdoor louvers and discharges into the return air mixing box. Supply air ducts rise vertically out of the top connection of the air handlers up to above ceiling and become unobservable for a short distance. Insulation could not be verified on this section of ductwork. Gas piping is routed from to each individual air handler for heating purposes. An open duct is routed to the mechanical room for common combustion air, and flue gas is vented out of the air handlers through PVC pipe. It is not clear the routing of the vent pipe or its termination location. Page 45 of 124 Outdoor Air conditioners The outdoor air conditioners are mounted to concrete pads just outside of the building in between the main building and gym. The units were observed to be in poor condition and had components missing. The nameplates showed all were the same 5-ton model and manufactured in 1991. Packaged Rooftop Units A total of four packaged Rooftop Units (RTUs) were installed on the roof of portions of the first floor, with two on the northeast corner and two on the northwest corner. Each RTU has gas piping routed to it for reheat. Supply and return duct come out horizontally from the unit, and run up along the side of the building into penetrations on the second and third floor. The duct does not appear to be insulated or protected from the elements. While not being able to be observed directly, it was noticed from observations that pieces were missing from the RTUs. The exterior cabinets looked weathered as well. Calculations Heating and cooling load calculations were performed to estimate the size of equipment needed to condition the building. The calculations account for the construction of the building including insulation, windows, building dimensions, internal loads of office equipment, lighting, and human occupancy, minimum ventilation load, and external heat gain/loss. The indoor environmental design criteria is as follows: a)Cooling Set Point: 75°F b)Heating Set Point: 70°F c)Humidity Set Point: 50% RH +/-5% The outdoor environmental design criteria is as follows: a)Summer: 100°F DB/78°F WB. b)Winter: 28°F Results of the calculations show that the required cooling for the building would be 103 tons. It should be noted that the calculations were made treating each floor as a “block” rather than trying to create specific zones within each floor. Floor Calculated Cooling Req’s (Tons) Calculated Heating Req’s (MBH) Calculated Supply Airflow (CFM) Floor 1 39 200.3 13,242 Floor 2 26.8 148.1 10,406 Floor 3 37.5 213.0 12,862 Recommendations Mechanical Based on observations of the site, it is recommended that the entire mechanical systems serving the building be replaced. The following options would be feasible: Option 1: Replace in kind Page 46 of 124 This option would involve removing the existing mechanical equipment and replacing with new, similarly functioning equipment. The existing split systems would be replaced with new variable capacity heat pumps. The indoor vertical air handlers would be replaced with higher efficiency fan models. Outdoor packaged rooftop units would be replaced with new units with variable capacity compressors. The units would have higher efficiency and variable flow fans. New variable air volume terminal units with electric reheat would be installed to accommodate new zoning and occupancies. Ductwork would be inspected and replaced as needed, and air devices would be replaced. A centralized control system using wireless controllers would be installed to control all mechanical equipment. Option 2: New centralized chilled water system This option would take advantage of using the center yard in between the buildings as a mechanical yard. A central air cooled chiller would be placed at ground level between the building and the gym, and feed chilled 44° F water to the building from the north. The split systems serving the first floor would have their outdoor units and indoor units removed. The indoor units would be replaced with a chilled water cooled air handler to condition the air, and feed new single duct VAV air terminals with electric reheat. Each zone would have a VAV air terminal and be able to vary its cooling and airflow or switch to heating as needed. Similarly, on the second and third floors the existing RTUs and VAVs would be removed. Each floor would have its own chilled water air handler and feed new single duct VAV air terminals with electric heat. Each zone would have a VAV air terminal and be able to vary its cooling and airflow or switch to heating as needed. Ideally the air handlers would be indoors for aesthetics of a historical building and maintainability. However, the air handlers can also be placed on the existing equipment supports outside. Ductwork would be inspected and replaced as needed, and air devices would be replaced. A centralized control system using wireless controllers would be installed to control all mechanical equipment. Plumbing It is recommended that the plumbing sanitary and domestic water lines be scoped by a plumber to check for pipe integrity for potential reuse. Any new piping will be copper for the domestic water and PVC for sanitary and vent. All existing fixtures are recommended to be removed and replaced with new fixtures, along with ADA-compliant options. Each floor is recommended to have its own new 10 gallon electric water heater. Electrical Based on observations of the site, it is recommended that the electrical distribution equipment and feeders be replaced. It is also recommended the at the lighting fixtures and controls be replaced. Additionally, the fire alarm system appears to be dated. Some work will be required to cover the new building layout. It is recommended to replace the fire alarm system to ensure full functionality. Electrical devices appear dated. They can remain, but device/wall plate replacement and raceway relocation is recommended to improve the aesthetics of the new spaces. Page 47 of 124 Conclusion The existing building mechanical equipment, ductwork, and plumbing fixtures should all be replaced immediately. The current equipment is old enough or missing enough components to warrant not repairing, and should be replaced with energy-efficient systems. Plumbing fixtures should be updated for the new occupancy and be ADA compliant. A new HVAC controls system should be installed to optimize energy usage and occupancy comfort. Page 48 of 124 Appendix A: Heating and Cooling Load Calculations Page 49 of 124 Page 50 of 124 Page 51 of 124 Page 52 of 124 Appendix B: Photographs Page 53 of 124 Figure 1. Packaged RTUs as seen from ground level Figure 2. Packaged RTUs as seen from indoor space Page 54 of 124 Figure 3.Typical water closet Figure 4. Typical restroom layout Page 55 of 124 Figure 5. Typical drinking fountain Figure 6. First floor controls cabinet Page 56 of 124 Figure 7. First floor vertical air handlers Figure 8. Various ducts tied to vertical air handlers Page 57 of 124 Figure 9. Second floor standalone control thermostat Figure 10. First floor outdoor units in mechanical yard Page 58 of 124 Figure 16. Utility transformer Figure 17. Panelboard nameplate showing a date of 1990 Page 59 of 124 Figure 83. Typical wall showing orange isolated ground receptacles and surface mounted raceway Figure 14. Existing fire alarm control panel Page 60 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COSTS Page 61 of 124 Opinion of Probable Construction Cost See next page. Phasing Opportunities Options and alternative systems are listed in the Opinion of Probable Cost. Immediate concerns would be those systems and scopes that are required for the Guadalupe Appraisal District to occupy the building. These systems would include mechanical and electrical replacements, restroom upgrades, repairs to the elevator, new ceilings, new walls for offices and accommodations for public services. Future work may include additional site work and parking, replacement of the windows, upgrades to finishes, and any work considered for the single story classrooms and gymnasium/cafeteria building. Page 62 of 124 123 45 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 A B C D E F G H I Project Assessment of Mary Erskine Building for Conversion to Guadalupe Appraisal District Offices Client Guadalupe County Appraisal DistrictDescriptionAssessment Phase Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Date 5/5/2025Provided by Debra J. Dockery, Architect, P.C. ELEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST MATERIALS & LABOR BASE COST GENERAL CONDITIONS - 18% INFLATION TO BID DATE - 5%ITEM TOTAL SITE WORK ADA corrections to front entry curb ramp & landing sf 330 $12.00 $3,960.00 Repair spalled and cracked concrete sidewalks sf 1850 $8.00 $14,800.00 Rework front entry steps for upper landing clearance sf 150 $125.00 $18,750.00 Drainage improvements and sidewalk trench drains lf 30 $160.00 $4,800.00 Covert existing basketball court to parking ls 1 $25,000.00 $25,000.00 Add asphalt paved parking sy 2445 $60.00 $146,700.00 Add concrete driveway apron for new parking sf 4200 $10.00 $42,000.00 Provide new site lighting for new parking ea 6 $4,000.00 $24,000.00 Remove abandoned play equipment ls 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 Provide new metal secured mechanical yard fencing lf 45 $90.00 $4,050.00 Add chain link fencing at one-story bdlg & gym lf 300 $65.00 $19,500.00 Building signage and wayfinding ls 1 $15,000.00 $15,000.00 Landscape improvments - sod repair ls 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 EXTERIOR WORK Provide repointing of missing masonry grout ls 500 $9.00 $4,500.00 Clean brick and stone sf 15300 $2.75 $42,075.00 Repaint sheet metal work lf 450 $5.00 $2,250.00 Replace existing windows with insulated units sf 3910 $165.00 $645,150.00 for energy savings - removal includes abatement INTERIOR WORK Add ADA compliant handrails at stairs lf 720 $75.00 $54,000.00 GENERAL Replace all suspended acoustical ceilings sf 19000 $4.25 $80,750.00 Refinish all wood floors sf 11900 $6.50 $77,350.00 Remove VCT floors (inc abatement). Provide LVT sf 7020 $7.00 $49,140.00 Repaint all interiors sf 26880 $3.00 $80,640.00 Provide new door hardware for all doors to remain ea 42 $500.00 $21,000.00 Room signage ea 77 $70.00 $5,390.00 See MEP for work at all floors OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST Page 1 of 3 Page 63 of 124 6 7 A B C D E F G H I ELEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST MATERIALS & LABOR BASE COST GENERAL CONDITIONS - 18% INFLATION TO BID DATE - 5%ITEM TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 INTERIOR WORK New walls for door clearance requirement sf 275 $12.00 $3,300.00 FIRST FLOOR New walls to secure staff areas sf 60 $12.00 $720.00 New walls for restrooms sf 950 $12.00 $11,400.00 Selective demolition of existing walls, finshes sf 9060 $2.00 $18,120.00 New doors at restrooms and door clearance relocate ea 10 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 New ceramic wall tile wainscot in restrooms sf 800 $15.00 $12,000.00 New ceramic floor tile in restrooms sf 580 $18.00 $10,440.00 New toilet accessories ea 50 $300.00 $15,000.00 New gypsum ceilings in restrooms sf 580 $6.00 $3,480.00 New casework for public breakroom lf 10 $720.00 $7,200.00 Repair cracks in plaster at stairs lf 30 $50.00 $1,500.00 Repairs for removed items (cap lines, flr slab, clng)ls 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 INTERIOR WORK New walls for Admin office sf 450 $12.00 $5,400.00 SECOND FLOOR New walls to secure staff areas sf 260 $12.00 $3,120.00 New walls for restrooms sf 950 $12.00 $11,400.00 Selective demolition of existing walls, finshes sf 8910 $2.00 $17,820.00 Infill walls at removed doors sf 50 $15.00 $750.00 New interior doors at new spaces ea 10 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 New ceramic wall tile wainscot in restrooms sf 600 $15.00 $9,000.00 New ceramic floor tile in restrooms sf 460 $18.00 $8,280.00 New toilet accessories ea 35 $300.00 $10,500.00 New gypsum ceilings in restrooms sf 460 $6.00 $2,760.00 New casework for staff breakroom lf 10 $720.00 $7,200.00 New public service security windows and counter sf 160 $300.00 $48,000.00 Repairs for removed items (cap lines, flr slab, clng)ls 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 INTERIOR WORK New walls for offices sf 2310 $12.00 $27,720.00 THIRD FLOOR New walls for restroom, breakroom sf 550 $12.00 $6,600.00 Selective demolition of existing walls, finshes sf 8910 $2.00 $17,820.00 New interior doors at new spaces ea 10 $1,200.00 $12,000.00 New ceramic wall tile wainscot in restrooms sf 400 $15.00 $6,000.00 New ceramic floor tile in restrooms sf 300 $18.00 $5,400.00 New toilet accessories ea 28 $300.00 $8,400.00 New gypsum ceilings in restrooms sf 300 $6.00 $1,800.00 Page 2 of 3 Page 64 of 124 6 7 A B C D E F G H I ELEMENT ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITS UNIT QUANTITY UNIT COST MATERIALS & LABOR BASE COST GENERAL CONDITIONS - 18% INFLATION TO BID DATE - 5%ITEM TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 New casework for staff breakroom lf 20 $720.00 $14,400.00 Repairs for removed items (cap lines, flr slab, clng)ls 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 MEP WORK ALL FLOORS Elevator Repairs ls 1 $8,000.00 $8,000.00 Option 2 HVAC central plant inc ductwork / controls ls 1 $1,612,191.00 $1,612,191.00 Remove existing ductwork inc abatement ls 1 $55,000.00 $55,000.00 Electrical, lighting and fire alarm replacement ls 1 $729,390.00 $729,390.00 Fire sprinler system rework for new layout ls 1 $12,500.00 $12,500.00 Interior plumbing systems ls 1 $364,695.00 $364,695.00 Replace exterior water and sewer lines lf 500 $175.00 $87,500.00 $4,676,611.00 $841,790 $275,920 $5,794,321 Does not include work to single story building or gym DESIGN LEVEL CONTINGENCY - 15%$869,148 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST $6,663,469 FEES, FURNITURE AND NON-FIXED EQUIPMENT - 30%$1,738,296 TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE PROJECT COST $8,401,765 Construction Cost Only Average cost to renovate single story building inc per sf $350 to $500 4500 sf 1,575,000$ 2,250,000$ new roofing, rotted roof framing replacement, new hvac, new lighging, new finishes, general repairs Average cost for gym repairs, metal roof coating per sf $175 to $300 8162 sf 1,428,350$ 2,448,600$ new hvac, new lighting, new finishes, general repairs Page 3 of 3 Page 65 of 124 Appendix C: Cost Estimate Page 66 of 124 MEP ESTIMATE - OPTION 1 Item Description Quantity Material/Equipment/Labor Total Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Amount 1 PACKAGED UNIT / VAV / DUCTS TON 64 $10,000.00 $640,000.00 $640,000.00 2 WIRELESS CONTROLS SF 24,313 $7.00 $170,191.00 $170,191.00 3 PLUMBING SYSTEMS SF 24,313 $15.00 $364,695.00 $364,695.00 4 SPLIT SYSTEM / DUCTWORK TON 39 $12,000.00 $468,000.00 $468,000.00 5 ELECTRICAL AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SF 24,313 $30.00 $729,390.00 $729,390.00 6 19 SUBTOTAL $2,372,276.00 $2,372,276.00 MEP ESTIMATE-OPTION 2 Item Description Quantity Material/Equipment/Labor Total Unit Quantity Unit Cost Amount Amount 1 CHILLERS / AIR HANDLER / VAV / DUCTS TON 103 $14,000.00 $1,442,000.0 0 $1,442,000.0 0 2 WIRELESS CONTROLS SF 24,313 $7.00 $170,191.00 $170,191.00 3 PLUMBING SYSTEMS SF 24,313 $15.00 $364,695.00 $364,695.00 4 ELECTRICAL AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SF 24,313 $30.00 $729,390.00 $729,390.00 5 19 SUBTOTAL $2,706,276.00 $2,706,276.00 Page 67 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT EXISTING CONDITIONS AND NEW CONCEPT DRAWINGS Page 68 of 124 . W4.35 SF .-r,u/ �- ,Au/ □LJJ/ ,F',LJ /�- ,Flu/ _, ( .-r,u/ �- \__ _) 192 SF �\! Ir D, . \_ � >-V JP IY... • / 16823 SF ' G G 84.191 5F &34.12 SF 499.43 SF 113.48 5F 163.63 SF cF't/-□ □ □ '-LJA . ' - \_LJA, ' - \.LJA f � "°' 13.fl38 5F \__ 886.14 5F _) � 192 SF - / •<F----1'1-'1 � �====!....1--1� .. 2=V •,.,{I X =======:::::;LJ::::;::::=====::::::====;::::LJ:::::::====�I\ "" r,::::=::::::;-;:::, I ======i-.....c:==:J....-J..J ! \J 669.13 SF □ □ 611.63 5F 69326 5F 616.WSF □ □ ' I\ •I,..., -...J EXISTING @ �S!a.��OOR LEVEL dD Plan North F<OOF 863.13 SF 18.361 SF ' I / I� / u� L • � I• S � I\ 618.16 5F EXISTING @ �ca.� FLOOR LEVEL dDflan North 863.13 5F LI 1836I � I\ 14422 5F 266.44 5F 616 5F A -_) 64218 5F 1.211.331 SF � 211.44 SF � -" \ ( I 19922 5F t----i-----;yri3'2DGE CVER __j;::���;::;;�,*�L~L".\DNG 11 /11 "-.. I I I I I I I \ \__ 93.889 SF 1 �\ \__ JP / / 61126 5F ;1 I X MBllM AEVEW ONLY l,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:Jl:�1,::: �.u. ··1l_cr1J�d ·o, pcrrr1il,t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstriJc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-,1:< I ic:�rh' liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: REVISIONS PROJECT NO_ 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION EXISTING ARST & SECOND FLOOR PLAN Page 69 of 124 � ..L -;:..... 6\!0.63 5F - rf,:00'1 ABOVE \] •I / / •. "u�lJ ,Y o, � 2,46':!.4 5F l!k _) V 2�5F lAF r\_ 51'3.6':!I SF JP � 614.38 5F .. / / / / . • ··-- ����" ·!c:=;�=m=:� l!::::::=�::::=:============::::::!..J-""""I._ X 1\1=====:jr � 1\1::::::=::::::;i/ _:, □ / � "-f': _,; � (□ � lyf l=========:r �::::::::::=-l--_J / 6&3.61 5F EXISITING @ ����OOR LEVEL 0 g 61 g Q 186.& SF Q 638.\!3 SF MBllM AEVEW ONLY l,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:Jl:�1,::: �.u. ··1l_cr1J�d ·o, pcrrr1il, t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstriJc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-, 1:< I ic:�rh' liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: • u .,_ ...u '°LU lij Ill 1--w�o -:I: !: Ill Ill Ill u ::) I\ i Ill VI � - • IllIll I\ < N • ,N � >-' >'Q'o N ffi iZB� � a�wts � ���� 0 �zI LLm< o. •111 VI T" cc LU 0 REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION EXISTING THIRD FLOOR PLAN Page 70 of 124 • --' '1 c,::a\ -�1111!!6'1'1'10C1 'i,j ,-7 '"' "C ,/ st¢" NEW t'IECI-IANICAL EGIIIFM&rr YAf'D AID � FENCtlG MAN ....,, ... r EXTE>l>LAN>tlG��======t�======:=:::it=.,,� ENTftY 6T � "-""_""' __ �---� REQURECI DOOR 6TOG'P ::::;;fr=== • @) CAMPUS SITE PLANSCALE: 1/32",rf-O" NEW AflPHALT PA"1!0 PA11K1tG a 36 ST.ALL.& F'fiOVIPE NEW ene LICif..ll't,ICi Plan Nmth • ---- / �l&THG 3' P-Of'ACE& r I t ._ ____ _ ---"""",...,. - �"'6-IOEGIJl!oec> HA>ctitl 81..0FE -...a, """"'""...., Of'AU.EI> <:a<c:!OETE lll4LI<& NEW 18 fDAfl(lt,ti &TALL& IN AN E>clMNCi: AFMAL T PA- '. ,0 L <J'i=-1 � IY 0 z MBllM AEVEW ONLY l,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:JH,::: . �.u. ··1l_cr1J�d O' pcrrr11l, t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstriJc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-, 1:< I ic:�rh' liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: • u .,_ ...u '° LU lij Ill 1--w�o-:I: I-10 Ill Illu5"i111 � VI �- • IllIll t-.< N • ,N � ... >'Q'o N � iZB�LU � a�wts u (Z Z� 0 o<O 0 �zI LLm< o. • IO VI � '" cc LU 0 REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION CAMPUS SITE PLAN Page 71 of 124 26'-3' ® _LALL LINE 43'.NE ,0 1 1 1 1 /"'rALL LN= ABCVE 13'-11' lrD'-9' 0 3'-0' � ltD'-9 1 _/ _ +--.- - -- - -11----1rr1 -1r--��M-1���--ni.,.. -------- � -.Jo"lRNv1fl'NfaL 8I �11 ."-�CD �� /. \ {_ � - 118 )-v:: 'i' l:fflJ 11 ,-. i,...,.....,. &'-0' R�E [fflJ E � Ila.Lr-;;;==��-f= I.,.,, &I '° ��-� 1 1,,---,,--- "'[jjz:] ! �;;;;:::;��ffi116��·f'.111SltM.!::::::::,;:==» /<--=Jl -114y!c:!.!::::==H=Jr I 'i==::::::le:1 81 t..--------� I r======�:ir=ii\ /If::;:::::::-,l===:::;1 1=FI=-;-@ "' I� = =i-,-= \ '---:: I� 77 II I II II J DN - UP - '-.._ 11 II s\l:;Nl', I 111 �-l'f 'S �II : 11 MEC!:HANICAI. 11 11 L -I- - --I 11 =--<::!, • --.. lllfflilOOM 11 '-=7 �--7 ' I I � 11 • V IY. I Ii ii §l I: II §l II II ,,---11 11 1 1 1 1 I , 11 _ _JJ l!::::=4=::::::lt:::::=====1 1 ====:::::::1::::11 l (no)lc:=1::'..:I L_--:: I I.� I,L "I S'-0' -, ' S'-l'D" ' , CORRIDOR"' ['!!!ZJ l) � � ARB ROOM[]jz] J T�ON n •r-:::'i - ~ ' lRAIN�OOM BREAK ROOM' � r-~ � (D 0 (D 14 1 -8 1 □ □ □ □ d h ". . L,, '..J I 11'-0' I ARB ROOM WAITING ROOM []!!II 'r-~ � ® ® 14'-8' rv7 - ® (J) s ..' N N MBllM AEVEW ONLYl,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:Jl:�1,::: �-u. ··1l_cr1J�d ·o, pcrrr1il, t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstruc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-,1:< I ic:�rr::� liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION FIRST FLOOR Pl.AN Page 72 of 124 :;,. ® ' ,Ii ROOF I N IIREAIC IIJOFil< ' ROOMi'::: STATION [ml S'-6 1 12'-21 tffil ., �TION' IE] � & IIJOFil< Q TATION ' ,.. !!,l 81 -ei•12'-,. @)\F�& R[ffl] o/ ,,--□ ® ;. ® ' • @�" Q IIJOFil< 12 1 -8 1 ·--:, u,; & TATION T 1v �o8J'S�@) �ACE I I [!ID I I [ffl] I I n s1-01 ;., IIJOFil< -11 I I ' 'r . "' s TATION L------I I ----- 8'-12)" I I 8'-91 !,1 @- I / � I« / JP ® ,, "'Q' ' !!,l h � �\ r I\ I\ Q - ;. IIJOFil< (0 ' UJOFil< IIJOFil< "f::l STATION 5TATION STATION - �------� RK ., �------' MAPPING rn[] [mlUJOFil< MAFFlr-t. 5TATION- @ 161-21 (@ �<?a.�� FLOOR LEVEL ® / " _o D_ " "' LJ Q_j � LJ / "" ;.' REiit� [G Ell QN � [:129] □Ell rn[] 9'-31 3'-"' Jt>1.91 I - 11 � @ II Q • II ii> ----II 11 T?&f 11 "' • "'11 11 I1;1.,z,1 I 11 11 II I ::..J LOBBY [fil] RJ6LIC 5E�ICE WINDOW � 0 ;:I\ 0 ,__ 11 s� ), ------�------ 16'-2 1 26'-3' ROOF CO;fCE I \_ -I IY :i 1,,c I, I D I. C •q r- SER�KS [m] s N ' � ®) �- @ 'i'i -� @ X Q... ' -- @ s..' N N MBllM AEVEW ONLY l,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:Jl:�1,::: �.u. ··1l_cr1J�d ·o, pcrrr1il, t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstruc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-, 1:< I ic:�rr::� liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION SECOND FLOOR PLAN Page 73 of 124 ' §)' a, "''in ROOF RESOURCE OFRCE 3 ,,--;::; [ffl] / ® ' � STATION- � STATION � STATION ® � STATION WOFiK STATION WOFiK STATION � STATION � STATION � STATION 6'-101 COLL.AeORA TION ;a:HUMAN 5FACE .t, RESOU™OOM 1 w.NG - _ (@ ' ==:: , ... 'S(Ob'1 A5:Jv:: -T-·-7 RJTUl<E I � WOFiK ....,,..._ t=STATION I STATION \ / , • U"__ ,.. .,I. 1-1-1-1"'-. / / DN N�Kffis ( []![] 21Z11-6 1 ._ I -�@ 91-81 -., in � 31-2 1 I CORRIDOR ['!Ml = WOFiK STATION � STATION D I 1881 [;] u L----=-----11 ��@O!IEFmsa 11341 14'-IID'14'-llZI' 8'-0' lM. 15t1.51 � STATION � STATION � a; \._ rnzJ coaia Q 24'-2' ' []l[I = ® 421-4 1 Plan North - � STATION ._ 21,1.3 1 � STATION � STATION WOFiK STATION @ ROOF I 41-1' , I• e I l'V I, � STATION � STATION .• -----·- er> @ ' -,-a; @ IX Q ,_ @ MBllM AEVEW ONLY l,oc1.rn(;nl inc:;•r:Jl:�1,::: �.u. ··1l_cr1J�d ·o, pcrrr1il, t-:i":Jdir,�, or '.":nnstruc:�i:-;n ,i',�CH-�C Ccb·c J Docker-,1:< I ic:�rr::� liq. I.Jo. 119.:-'.: REVISIONS PROJECT NO. 2025-01 PHASE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS DATE APRIL 2025 DESCRIPTION THIRD FLOOR PLAN Page 74 of 124 MARY ERSKINE BUILDING ASSESSMENT REFERENCES Page 75 of 124 llOTES: BASIS OF BEARING IS ASSU,!ED ALONG THE EAST ROW LINE OF N. RIVER ST. TRI-COUNTY SURVEYING INC., HAS MADE NO FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FOR THE PROPERTY SHOWM HEREOfl. ALL SET PINS ARE I /2" DIAl!ETER REBAR WITH AN ORANGE PLASTIC CAP STAt�PED "TRI-COUNTY''_ CORRESPONDING FIELD NOTES PREPA.RED. 15 I GRAPHIC SCALE JC 50 120 I ( lN FEET ) i------�: 1 inch = 30 It. 55' R.O.W. ' --,-----U';l3:r,-I u Tl'lcr==="'<8"'='=''u-===n===lru===u===::iuu=c=q� ---u--,------'-'-''c'-oe- .,. E \ I r=:SET =====�k!=����L_J�l;�',f:]Jjj;f!fl±±tittttutt�--7 PIN i:: �,, , _ _-:-;-· ·:·,-:-,�·�;-·�·. ",_�,.:-�/-�';".:·<,::/�·-:..-:-.,.,:,. ll 'II 0 _,------------,, \,,,,• ,,,,:,.:,,ct,l!t! � • ,---------8:-::7 --:.8 :-, -,-'t -."-,1"--:IC7""�-. --';��i=;-=:,""':�71-~i--�-r~-�P•-_y ' ' 1; , .��, ... i tl�f �r�i --l ,_,,�.,. .� , 1 (.> <( /!, "' (.> u "" <( 0:: f--jE u "' <( <( :¢ '; .• i})\ M!fi�:�t�S u :2��?,EREO 1\ COVERED ;;{'\•>( 4 C:'l i\ 1-STORYBRICK &TUCCO PLUS BASEMENT "'­ GRATE COVERED COVER \1 50.9' j �;?c L----' IS] �. =-....----1 23.7' 2:3.7' 3-STORYBRICK PLUS BASEMENT LECIBIC PANEL .J----� 1----8; 26.2' ... '' 7 SPACES 5 SP C: ·1 ·-�-<• .... . ·,.: v,.-c: ) ,/ -"'a-°)J C /' "" ,I I --\,/' //.-/, /l�j\ 6 SPACES �" "'· i\;�:/•· 30.8' (/1 I0 0 d 00 i o, 0 [Tl 'F'Z1J;(;' l;IJ� i:.:.tr:·:-·;:, ·= ·.::.;j 1 01 I :1 11 I I, M I Cl I ,_. I [";},: I \ lell� \;'" CO!:r_,y Ul"-, <I, T :.»,t. . 0 jj_\ � "1>t,._ "' • -li"Y-1!-lt.'114 NORTH AUSTIN SEGUIN, TEXAS 78155 PH: (830) 372-1001 FX: (830) 379-1155 ---u---U - IJ - = WOOD ;:"ENCE - ◊ -= CI-IAIM-UNK FENCE - U -"' OVERHEAD UTILITY C'Q_, = UTILIT'l' POLE -, = GUY ¢ = LIGHT POLE ® = WA"TER MElER -i,-=SIGN 8 = Cl...£AN OUT G = RISER ISi = GAS METER � .,, FIRE HYDRANT [··•;;_:•-::� :.-'.j = COtlCRETE � mBRICK i?£-j = IRANSFORMER 1Hl5 GRAPHIC WORK REPRESENTS lHE RESULTS OF A SURVEY BEING PROVIDED BY lRI-COUNn' SURVEYING, INC. SOLELY FOR TI,E EXCLUSIVE USE OF THE PARTIES SHOWN HEREON. NO LICENSE HAS Bl:EN CRtATEO, EXPRESSED OR IMPLI!:O, TO COPY OR USE THIS GRAPHIC. WORK 01rlER 1rlAN FOR THE PURPOSE SHO'M-1 HEREON. lHIS SURVEY IS EMBOSSED 'MTH THE SURVEYOR'S IMPRESSION SEAL AND SIGNED IN RED INK, IF THIS PLAT DOES NOT HAVE lrlESE 1WO CONDITIONS FULFILLED, IT IS A COPY AND MAY HAVE BEEN ALTER£D. TRI-COUNTY SURVEYING, INC. ASSUMES NO REsPONSIBIUTY FOR COPIES OF THIS SUR\IEY OTHER THAN 11-lE COPIES BEARING lHE ORIG1NAL IMPRESSION SEAL ANO SlGNATURE SIGNED IN RED INK. ALL RIGHTS RESERV8l, COP'fRIGHT 2013, TRI-COUtHY SURVEYING INC, (0 PI.AY GROUND EQUIPMENT 216 E. COLLEGE ST. PLAT SHOWING: l:�f:t 70' R.O,W. E. COT,T.EG E ST. 7/135 ASPHAL·,-8/'iSl<ETBALL COUP.-$ u u - -CONC CURB SURVEY OF A 4.00 ACRE TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE HUMPHRIES BRANCH SURVEY NO. 17, ABSTRACT 6, CITY OF SEGUIN, BEING A PORTION OF LOT 4, BLOCK 2, FARMING LOTS OF THE TOWN OF SEGUIN, PLAT RECORDED IN VOLUME A, u PAGE 158, DEED RECORDS, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, AND BEING THAT TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SEGUIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT, BY DEED RECORDED IN VOLUME 3077, PAGE 660, OFFICIAL RECORDS, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. ! \i'l \!� !8C u cr.i � PREPARED FOR: SEGUIN INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT STA TE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF GUADALUPE: EBY CERTIFY THAT ACTIJAL SURVEY MADE ON ING UNDER MY SUPERVl 81.E EASEMENTS OR ENCR ''' '' •, ,, ' REGI STERED ; -_ RJ�O. 4493 I ',' ·', , SURVEYED: NOVEMBER 9, 2�21 i , /1\'. 1>·'PROJECT NO.: 1307104 DWG No., 1307104A Page 76 of 124 IMPROVEMENTS SEGUIN▪ TEXAS COMMERCIAL BUILDING LPA 2025.03.184 PAGE 45 BUILDING SKETCH Page 77 of 124 r r ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: I 2x 12" Cream w/ Tan Streak Floor Tile and Mastic2.Homogeneous Area I:~ 750 Square Feet -Room I 08 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample number's: NIA 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good with potential for damage9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M PlanFIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The floor tile appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Floor tile must be maintained by regular cleaning and waxing. Stripping old wax shall be conducted by utilizing a generous quantity of sudsy H20. Use ample quantity of wax and apply with a buffer not exceeding 300 rpm when re-waxing floors. Furniture or equipment shall be moved across asbestos containing floor tile only by the use of dollies or portable trucks and then only if the floor has been protected with rubber mats or other effective protective covering. Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing floor tile is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall carpet with asbestos containing floor tile under it be Ii fted or removed or the floor tile removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/2412018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 78 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA J.YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: 12x 12" Off-white with grey pattern floor tile and mastic 2.Homogeneous Area 2: ~57,190 Square Feet -Main Building-First Floor Corridors, Lobby 5, Classroom 304 (303 on floor plan) east and west Stairwell landings, Main Entry, Classroom 402 and Old Cafeteria and Storage Closet; Gymnasium Stage and Storages, Room 105 & 107, I st Floor Storage & Mechanical Room and Teacher's Lounge 3.Sample Collection Area: 1 st Floor Elevator Lobby, 3 rd Floor Classroom 302 (marked as 303 on floor plan) and Janitor's Closet 4.Sample number's: H2-A, B & C 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Chrysotile, 1.5% 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: Low 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The 12x 12 in floor tile appears to be in good condition and well maintained. Some partially damaged tiles in Classroom 4. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Floor tile must be maintained by regular cleaning and waxing. Stripping old wax shall be conducted by utilizing a generous quantity of sudsy H 2 0. Use ample quantity of wax and apply with a buffer not exceeding 300 rpm when re-waxing floors. Furniture or equipment shall be moved across asbestos containing floor tile only by the use of dollies or portable trucks and then only if the floor has been protected with rubber mats or other effective protective covering. Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing floor tile is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall carpet with asbestos containing floor tile under it be lifted or removed or the floor tile removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# 0 0 0 Page 79 of 124 r r ERSKINE ELEMENTARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/ t 8/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21 /20 I 8 1.Type of Material: HV AC vibration damper2.Homogeneous Area 3: Attached to four exterior HVAC package units.3.Sample Collection Area: NI A4.Sample numbers: NIA5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good with potential for damage9.Acces sibility: Low10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M PlanFIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The 4 vibration dampers appear to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Asbestos containing HV AC vibration dampers should be monitored on a regular basis. At no time shall personnel or employees impact ACM or tape either by hand or with any powered machinery. Sanding, grinding, cutting, abrading, drilling or puncturing asbestos containing vibration dampers shall not be pennitted. Any penetrations, removal, or repair to Asbestos containing vibration damper material must be conducted only by ac credited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 80 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18 /2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/2112018 I.Type of Material: HV AC duct caulking 2.Homogeneous Area 4: 12 Linear Feet -interface between HVAC duct penetration and the exterior wall 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA 4.Sample numbers: N IA 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: Low 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Materials appear to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Asbestos containing caulking should be monitored on a regular basis. At no time shall personnel or employees impact ACM or caulk either by hand or with any powered machinery. Sanding, grinding, cutting, abrading, drilling or puncturing asbestos containing caulking shall not be permitted. Any penetrations, removal, or repair to Asbestos containing caulking must be conducted only by accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # 0 0 0 Page 81 of 124 r ERSKINE ELEMENTARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/20/2018 1.Type of Material: Exterior Caulk2.Homogeneous Area 5: l ,000 Linear Feet -doorways and windows of the MainBuilding3.Sample Collection Area: Main Building4.Sample numbers: ErE-C445.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: 7% Chrysotile8. Condition: Good9.Accessibility: LowI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Caulk was in good condition and non-friable. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing caulking is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall ACBM be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# Page 82 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: 12x12" Cream/White Marbled Floor Tile and Mastic2.Homogeneous Area 6: -415 Square Feet -Elevator and Outside Elevator I st Floor3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample number's: NIA5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good with potential for damage9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M PlanFIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The floor tile appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Floor tile must be maintained by regular cleaning and waxing. Stripping old wax shall be conducted by utilizing a generous quantity of sudsy H 2 0. Use ample quantity of wax and apply with a buffer not exceeding 300 rpm when re-waxing floors. Furniture or equipment shall be moved across asbestos containing floor tile only by the use of dollies or portable trucks and then only if the floor has been protected with rubber mats or other effective protective covering. Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing floor tile is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall carpet with asbestos containing floor tile under it be lifted or removed or the floor tile removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # 0 0 0 Page 83 of 124 r r ERSKINE ELEMENTARY -SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: Wood Flooring 2.Homogeneous Area 7: ~15,230 Square Feet -Classroom 1-3, Rooms 103 & 106, Throughout 2nd Floor Classrooms and Corridors, Room 301,302,304,305,306,402 and 3rd Floor Corridor, Office/ Attendance, Book Room (Room 306) 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA 4.Sample number's: NIA 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: High 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Wood flooring appeared to be in good condition and well maintained. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall wood flooring be removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# Page 84 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY -SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: Brown Cove Base2.Homogeneous Area 8: ~1,475 Linear Feet-Room 4, Room 101-108, I st FloorCorridor, Entry to Boy's and Girl's 1 st Floor Restrooms, Storages, Lounge, MDF Room,Classroom 301, 302, 304, 305 & 402, 3 rd Floor Corridor3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: NI A5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: Moderate10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Cove base appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall cove base be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # 0 0 0 Page 85 of 124 r r r ERSKINE ELEMENTARY -SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPEC TION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21 /2018 1.Type of Material: Grey Cove Base 2.Homogeneous Area 9: ~210 Linear Feet -Elevator, Rooms 1-3 and 3 rd Floor Storage, I st Floor Storage, Gymnasium Storages, Old Cafeteria 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA 4.Sample numbers: NIA 5.Material Classification: Surface 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed 8.Condition: Good 9.Accessibility: Moderate 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan. FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Cove base appeared to be in good condition. PREV ENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall cove base be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 86 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY -SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18 /2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1.Type of Material: Black Cove Base2.Homogeneous Area I 0:~ 125 Linear Feet -Room 306, Cafeteria 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: N/ A5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: Moderatel 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Cove base appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall cove base be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# 0 0 0 Page 87 of 124 r ERSKINE ELEMENTARY -SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1.Type of Material: Blue/Grey Terrazzo Flooring 2.Homogeneous Area 11: ~930 Square Feet-J 51 Floor Boy's and Girl's Restrooms 3.Sample Collection Area: N/ A 4.Sample number's: NIA 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: Low 10.Recommended Action: Maintain flooring in a manner pursuant to the Asbestos O&M Plan. FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Terrazzo flooring appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall terrazzo flooring be removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# Page 88 of 124 ERSKINE EL EMENTARY -SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1.Type of Material: Black/Brown Terrazzo Flooring2.Homogeneous Area 12: ~440 Square Feet -Old Kitchen3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample number's: NIA 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good with potential for damage9.Accessibility: LowI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain flooring in a manner pursuant to the Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Terrazzo flooring appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall terrazzo flooring be removed except by EPA accredited/OSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/OSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # 0 0 0 Page 89 of 124 r r ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY -SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: Grey Ceramic Tile Grout2.Homogeneous Area 13: ~600 Square Feet-Faculty Ladies and Men's Restrooms, 3rd Floor Boy's and Girl's Restrooms3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: NIA5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Ceramic tile grout appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall ceramic tile grout be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 90 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENTARY -SEGUIN ISO 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1.Type of Material: White Restroom Caulk2.Homogeneous Area 14:~ 175 Linear Feet -Girl's and Boy's Restroom 3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: NIA5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: Moderate10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Caulk appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall caulk be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # 0 0 0 Page 91 of 124 r ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY -SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1.Type of Material: Grey Sink Undercoat2.Homogeneous Area 15: 3 Fixtures -Room 101 and Lounge3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: NI A5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Sink Undercoat appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall sink undercoat be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 92 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY -SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 1 . Type of Material: White Ceramic Tile Grout 2.Homogeneous Area 16: ~300 Square Feet-Faculty Ladies and Men's Restrooms3.Sample Collection Area: NI A4.Sample numbers: N/ A5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Ceramic tile grout appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall ceramic tile grout be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# 0 0 0 Page 93 of 124 r r ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY - SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2018 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/18/2015 Re-Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 I.Type of Material: Black Sink Undercoat2.Homogeneous Area 17: I Fixture-Nurse's Clinic3.Sample Collection Area: NIA4.Sample numbers: NI A5.Material Classification: Surface6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable7.Sample Analysis Result: Assumed8.Condition: Good9.Accessibility: ModerateI 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan.FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Sink undercoat appeared to be in good condition. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Under no circumstances shall sink undercoat be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/24/2018 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 94 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2021 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/20/2018 Re-Inspection Date: 8/12/2021 1.Type of Material: Exterior Caulk 2.Homogeneous Area 5: 1,000 Linear Feet -doorways and windows of the Main Building 3.Sample Collection Area: Main Building 4.Sample numbers: ErE-C44 5.Material Classification: Surface 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: 7% Chrysotile 8.Condition: Good 9.Accessibility: Low I 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan. FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Caulk was in good condition and non-friable. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing caulking is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall ACBM be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/13/2021 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 95 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENTARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2021 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 Re-Inspection Date: 8/12/2021 1.Type of Material: 12xl2" Off-white with grey pattern floor tile and mastic 2.Homogeneous Area 2: ~57, 190 Square Feet -Main Building -First Floor Corridors, Lobby 5, Classroom 303 & 301 east and west Stairwell landings, Main Entry, Old Cafeteria and Storage Closet; Gymnasium Stage and Storages, Room 205, 105 & 107, 1st Floor Storage & Mechanical Room and Teacher's Lounge 3.Sample Collection Area: 1st Floor Elevator Lobby, 3rd Floor Classroom 303 and Janitor's Closet 4.Sample number's: H2-A, B & C 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Chrysotile, 1.5% 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: Low 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The 12xl2 in floor tile appears to be in good condition and well maintained. Some partially damaged tiles in Classroom 4. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Floor tile must be maintained by regular cleaning and waxing. Stripping old wax shall be conducted by utilizing a generous quantity of sudsy H20. Use ample quantity of wax and apply with a buffer not exceeding 300 rpm when re-waxing floors. Furniture or equipment shall be moved across asbestos containing floor tile only by the use of dollies or portable ttucks and then only if the floor has been protected with rubber mats or other effective protective covering. Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing floor tile is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall carpet with asbestos containing floor tile under it be lifted or removed or the floor tile removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/13/2021 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# Page 96 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENT ARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2021 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/20/2018 Re-Inspection Date: 8/12/2021 1.Type of Material: Exterior Caulk 2.Homogeneous Area 5: 1,000 Linear Feet -doorways and windows of the Main Building 3.Sample Collection Area: Main Building 4.Sample numbers: ErE-C44 5.Material Classification: Surface 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: 7% Chrysotile 8.Condition: Good 9.Accessibility: Low I 0. Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan. FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS Caulk was in good condition and non-friable. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing caulking is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall ACBM be removed except by EPA accredited/ DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/13/2021 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License # Page 97 of 124 ERSKINE ELEMENTARY-SEGUIN ISD 216 EAST COLLEGE 2021 AHERA 3-YEAR REINSPECTION -HOMOGENEOUS AREA REPORT Previous Inspection Date: 8/21/2018 Re-Inspection Date: 8/12/2021 1.Type of Material: 12xl2" Off-white with grey pattern floor tile and mastic 2.Homogeneous Area 2: ~57, 190 Square Feet -Main Building -First Floor Corridors, Lobby 5, Classroom 303 & 301 east and west Stairwell landings, Main Entry, Old Cafeteria and Storage Closet; Gymnasium Stage and Storages, Room 205, 105 & 107, 1st Floor Storage & Mechanical Room and Teacher's Lounge 3.Sample Collection Area: 1st Floor Elevator Lobby, 3rd Floor Classroom 303 and Janitor's Closet 4.Sample number's: H2-A, B & C 5.Material Classification: Miscellaneous 6.Friable or Non-Friable: Non Friable 7.Sample Analysis Result: Chrysotile, 1.5% 8.Condition: Good with potential for damage 9.Accessibility: Low 10.Recommended Action: Maintain on Asbestos O&M Plan FIELD NOTES AND OBSERVATIONS The 12xl2 in floor tile appears to be in good condition and well maintained. Some partially damaged tiles in Classroom 4. PREVENTATIVE MEASURES Floor tile must be maintained by regular cleaning and waxing. Stripping old wax shall be conducted by utilizing a generous quantity of sudsy H20. Use ample quantity of wax and apply with a buffer not exceeding 300 rpm when re-waxing floors. Furniture or equipment shall be moved across asbestos containing floor tile only by the use of dollies or portable ttucks and then only if the floor has been protected with rubber mats or other effective protective covering. Sanding, grinding, cutting or abrading asbestos containing floor tile is prohibited. Under no circumstances shall carpet with asbestos containing floor tile under it be lifted or removed or the floor tile removed except by EPA accredited/DSHS licensed asbestos workers supervised by an EPA accredited/DSHS licensed supervisor. Mark D. Freemyer 8/13/2021 Date #105695 Texas DSHS License# Page 98 of 124 ELEVATOR / ESCALATOR AND RELATED EQUIPMENT REPORT OF INSPECTION THIS FORM MUST BE FILLED OUT COMPLETELY AND SUBMITTED WITH ATTACHMENTS IF NECESSARY. INSPECTION DATA – TO BE COMPLETED BY INSPECTOR FILING FEE: $20.00 PER UNIT 1.Unit #: of 2.ELBI #:3.Decal #:4.Removed from Service Date: 5.Building Name:Building Designation: 6.Manufacturer: Building Physical Address: 7.Model Type: Street Number, Street, Suite No./Apt. No., City, State, Zip Code 8.Serial #: 9.Type of Unit: (select one) Pass Esc. M.W. W.L. LULA Frt Elev Other (specify): 10.Drive Machine: (select one)Electric Hydraulic Other (specify): 11.Year Installed:13.Number of Floors: 14.Speed:15.Capacity:16.# of Car Openings 12.Year Altered: 18.Test Data Tag in Place?Yes No 19. Type of Inspection: (select all that apply)A – Annual B – New Installation or Returned to Service C – Alteration F – 5 Year Test Other: 20.# Rule Code Year Violations Use page ELE002a if additional pages are necessary Check box if ELE002a is attached Repeat 21.INSPECTOR SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATE PROCESSING I certify this is a true report of my inspection. I further certify that the information on this report is correct. TDLR INSP LIC#: Inspector Name Printed Inspector Signature Date Inspection Completed 22.CONTACT INFORMATION REQUIRED TO BE COMPLETED BY OWNER OR OWNER AGENT Owner Name:Phone Number: (Area Code) Phone Number Email Address: Owner Mailing Address: (ex: johndoe@yourbusinessemail.com) Number, Street, Suite No, Apt No. City State Zip Code 23.Building Contact Name:Contact Phone Number: (Area Code) Phone Number Building Contact Business/Public Email Address: Building Contact Mailing Address: (ex: johndoe@youbusinesemail.com) Number, Street, Suite No, Apt No. City State Zip Code 24.OWNER OR OWNER AGENT SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATE PROCESSING I certify that all violations cited by the inspector (if any) have been corrected OR are under contract to be corrected OR I have obtained a waiver or delay. All contact information above is accurate and all required documents and fees are attached. I understand that a certificate of compliance cannot be issued if the Inspection Report is incomplete, or any supporting documentation is missing. Owner/Agent Printed Name All correspondence including legal notices will be sent to (select one) Owner/Agent Signature Owner Address Building Contact Address TDLR Form ELE002 rev Oct. 2023 Date 17. Due Date for Next 5 Year Safety Test Comments: Page 1 of 1 Page 99 of 124 ELEVATOR / ESCALATOR AND RELATED EQUIPMENT ADDITIONAL INSPECTION REPORT PAGE P.O. Box 12157  Austin, Texas 78711-2157 (800) 803-9202  (512) 463-6599  FAX (512) 475-2871 www.tdlr.texas.gov  cs.elevators.escalators@tdlr.texas.gov # Rule Code Year Violations (Cont.) (Attach additional page(s) if necessary. Use this same form.) Repeat Comments (Cont.) (Attach additional page(s) if necessary. Use this same form.) ELBI #: Building Name: Decal #: Page ____ of ____ TDLR Form ELE002a rev April 2016 __________________________________________________________________________________________________________ INSPECTOR LICENSE # INSPECTOR NAME PRINTED INSPECTOR SIGNATURE DATE Page 100 of 124 INSTRi}CTIONS MONTHLY T ESTING OF FIREFIGHTER EMERG ENCY PERATION,WITH RECORDED FINDINGS,REQUIRED BY ASME A17.L8.6.11.1 (2007). PHASE I HALL FIREFIGHTER EMERGENCY RECALL. PHASE II EMERGENCY IN CAR OPERATION. EMERGENCY SIGNALING DEVICES,INQLUDING AN, UDIBLE ALARM AND TWO WAY COMMUNICATION (PHONE) IN THE CAR. (NOTE)Monthly testing of emerge cy signaling devices is not required by code,but 's reccomended. (1)TURN THE PHASE I HALL KEY SWITCH,LOCA ED AT THE DtSIGNATEDLEVEL TO THE (ON) POSITION,THE ELEV�T [ R($)SHOULD RECALL TOTHAT LEVEL AND OPEN THEIR DOORS.(2)T EST EACH CAR ON PHASE II EMERGENCY I CAR OPERATION;ASFOLLOWS.(A)TURN THE PHASE II KEY SWITCH TO TE (HOLD) POSITION ANDPUSH THE DOOR CLOSE BUTTON.THE oopR SHOULD NOT CLOSE. ( 3 ) ( 4) (B)TURN THE PHASE II K EY SWITCH TO TkE (ON) POSITION ANDPUSH THE DOOR CLOSE BUTTON.THE DOpR SHOULD CLOSE.WHEN THEDOOR IS FULLY CLOSED;SET SEVERAL CALLS.TH E CAR SHOULDSTART TO TRAVEL;QUICKLY PUSH THE CALL CANCEL BUTTON,THECAtLS SHOULD EXTINGUISH.TH E CAR S�OULD STOP AT THE NEXTAVAILABLE LEVEL.THE DOOR SHOULD NOT OPEN.(NOTE) PHASE II OPERATION MUST §vERRID E ANY CAR CALL SECURITY SYSTEMS. ie.carµ reader,keys,or touch pads etc. I (C)PUSH THE DOOR OPEN BUTTON,THE DOO� SHOULD START TO OPEN;QUICKLY RELE ASE THE DOOR OPEN BUT ON,THE DOOR SHOULD RECLOSE WITH NO DELAY. (NOTE) THE RECLOSE FEATURE PROT CTS EMERGENCY PERSONNEL IF FIRE IS PRESENT IN TH HALLWAY. (D)PUSH AND HOLD THE DOOR OP EN BOTTO UNTIL TH E DOOR ISFULLY OP EN. (E)TURN THE PHASE II K EY SWITCH TO TE (bFF) POSITION THEDOOR SHOULD CLOSE AUTOMATICALLY D THE CAR SHOULD RECALLTO THE DESIGNATED LEVBL,AND OPEN ITS DOORS.(NOTE) WHILE THE DOO .. R IS CLOSilG AUTOMATICALLY THE SMOKE SENSITIVE DOOR RE P ENING DEVICES MUST B E OUT OF SERVICE,WITH EDUCED DOOR CLOSING FORCE. I WHEN ALL CARS HAVE BEEN TE STED ON PHASE II IN CAR OPERATION AND ARE BACK AT THE DESIGNiTED LEVEL ITH THEIR DOORS OPEN; TURN THE PHASE I HALL KEY SWITCH TO T E BYPASS/RESET POSITION ALLOW THREE SECONDS,THEN T0RN THE KEY SWITCH TO THE (OFF) POSITION,REMOVE KEY. CHECK ALL CARS FOR NORMAL OPERATION,R CORD THE T EST FINDINGS, REPORT ANY DEFICIENCIES To: THE BUILDirG MANAGER. (NOTE) FOR DETAILS OF EMERG ENCt OPERATIONS AND SIGNAL DEVICES SEE ASME A17.1 ECTION 2.27 TESTS ARE NOW COMPLETE I ,, I1. ·1 ,I !!! I 'I I: 1i I I I I I, I Page 101 of 124 I • TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF LICENSING AND REGULATION Elevator Pr�gram P. 0. Box 12157 • Austin, Texas 78711 • (512) 463-6599 • (800) 803-9202 (512)475-2871 • Email: CS.E/evators.Escalators[a)Jd/r.tex.as.gov • Web site: www.tdlr.tex.as.gov Instructions for Obtaining an Elevator/Escalator Certificate of Compliance The Texas Health and Safety Code, Chapter 754, requires building owners to hire a registered elevator inspector (a list is available on our website) to conduct an annual safety inspection on all elevators, escalators and related equipment. Per Elevator Safety and Licensing Administrative Rule, §74.50, the owner must submit all required documentation to the department within 30 days of the equipment inspection date. ***Penalties of up to $5,000 may be assessed for each violation of this law and rule.*** Building Owner Responsibility: The building owner is responsible for submitting the following documentation and fees annually, within 30 days of the dnte of inspection. 1.The owner, or owner's agent, will obtain the original Elevator Equipment Report of Inspection fonn from the inspector, for each elevator, escalator or piece of related equipment. 2.The owner must complete the owner and contact person information on the front of the Report of Inspection form. 3.The inspector will fill out the Violation Code and qescription sections, and the Equipment . Specifications section. 4.The owner and inspector both must sign and date the inspection form to acknowledge the inspection was conducted and any violations have been corrected or are under an active and legitimate contract to be corrected, prior to the next inspection. 5.The completed Elevator Equipment Report of Inspection Forrn(s) and total amount of allfees owed must be made _payable by check or money ord1:.:r to Texasl)epartment ofpcensin$ and R1�gulation. The owner must pay a Fee of $20 for each piece of equipmentmspectea. 6.Late Filing: If an inspection report is filed 60 days after the date of inspection, eachpfoce of equipment will be assessed a late fee of$ W for every 30 day perioa Repeat Violations: If any violations are marked as "REPEAT VIOLATION", they must immediately be corrected and the corrections must be verified by the inspector. The inspector must submit verification in writing to TDLR in order for the owner to obtain a certificate of compliance. Waiver and Delay Consideration and Information : For Waiver and Delay consideration and mformat1on, go to the Elevator or Escalator Delay and Waiver Form at: http://www.tdlr.texas.gov/elevator/eleO 12.pdf ***Mail all required documents and fees to the Texas Depanment of Licensing and Regulation, P.O. Box 12157, Austin, TX 78711. For overnight or walk-in. use physical address of 920 Colorado Street, Austin, TX 78701 . LATE UNSAF\E 00IELE (Revised 1/2014) Page 102 of 124 Commercial. Ran the camera through a total of five outside clean outs and a total of three separated. cast-iron lines inside of a hatchway in the main building. And was able to get under the old cafeteria and the building to the west of the gym. The building to the west of the gym has back fall on some of the sewer lines and has pressure fittings and some of them as well. When we ran the camera through one clean out outside on the west side of the gym, it is an old clay pipe, and the line has multiple brakes and rocks and mud and is unable to go more than 10 to 15 foot either direction. The four cleanouts on the main building in the courtyard the pipes are holding water and has rocks and other debris in them. and one line we were able to go approximately 20 foot but could not go any further due to roots in the line. The Ground floor of the main building I recommend pulling multiple toilets in different locations and running the camera through them to inspect the sewer line under the building itself since we could not get anything to go from the cleanouts in the courtyard under the building. (note) Need to verify where the city tap for the sewer is located. Page 103 of 124 Page 104 of 124 Page 105 of 124 �� i�� �� ��i'�­ ��;/h I Page 106 of 124 Page 107 of 124 Page 108 of 124 Page 109 of 124 .I I Page 110 of 124 / / '.L Page 111 of 124 Page 112 of 124 Page 113 of 124 ADDENDUM Sec. 6.051. OWNERSHIP OR LEASE OF REAL PROPERTY. (b) The acquisition or conveyance of real property or the construction or renovation of a building or other improvement by an appraisal district must be approved by the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of board members. The board of directors by resolution may propose a property transaction or other action for which this subsection requires approval of the taxing units. The chief appraiser shall notify the presiding officer of each governing body entitled to vote on the approval of the proposal by delivering a copy of the board's resolution, together with information showing the costs of other available alternatives to the proposal. On or before the 30th day after the date the presiding officer receives notice of the proposal, the governing body of a taxing unit by resolution may approve or disapprove the proposal. If a governing body fails to act on or before that 30th day or fails to file its resolution with the chief appraiser on or before the 10th day after that 30th day, the proposal is treated as if it were disapproved by the governing body. Page 114 of 124 Guadalupe Appraisal District Expansion Options Comparisons December 11, 2024 Opinion of Probable Project Cost SINGLE STORY 8,000 SF ADDITION to Existing Facility Including 30 Additional Parking Stalls Construction Cost $3,690,600 Contingencies 15% $ 553,590 “Soft” Costs 25% $ 992,650 $5,166,840 Land purchase cost not included. One to two additional acres are needed. Inflation to bid date is not included (bid date unknown). On site storm water detention will likely be required. Fire lane turn around or second vehicle egress will be required. Materials and systems assumed to be same as current facility. TWO STORY 8,960 SF ADDITION to Existing Facility Including 30 Additional Parking Stalls, 2ND Floor Shell Space Construction Cost $3,580,827 Contingencies 15% $ 537,124 “Soft” Costs 25% $ 895,207 $5,013,158 Square footage increased to account for elevator and 2 stairs. Second floor not finished out initially. No a/c, no plumbing, limited electrical. Land purchase cost not included. At least one additional acre is needed. Inflation to bid date is not included (bid date unknown). On site storm water detention will likely be required. Fire lane turn around or second vehicle egress will be required. Materials and systems assumed to be same as current facility. RENOVATION OF COLLEGE STREET BUILDING – 3 STORY BUILDING 21,900 SF HVAC and lighting replacement, restroom upgrades, new service counter, IT and security upgrade, repave basketball court for parking Construction Cost $2,539,712 Contingencies 15% $ 380,957 “Soft” Costs 25% $ 634,928 $3,555,597 Building purchase cost not included. Inflation to bid date not included (bid date unknown). Roofing, fire sprinkler, plumbing and electrical systems require no renovations. Page 115 of 124 Renovation of College Street Annex Building, Old Band Hall, Gymnasium and Cafeteria could be postponed to a later date. RENOVATION OF COLLEGE STREET BUILDING – CLASSROOM ANNEX AND OLD BAND HALL 5,290 SF HVAC and lighting replacement, roofing replacement, IT and security, general painting and interior finish upgrades Construction Cost $ 732,346 Contingencies 15% $ 109,852 “Soft” Costs 25% $ 183,086 $1,025,284 RENOVATION OF COLLEGE STREET BUILDING – GYMNASIUM AND CAFETERIA, 8,600 SF HVAC and lighting replacement, roofing replacement, IT and security, general painting and interior finish upgrades Construction Cost $1,069,152 Contingencies 15% $ 160,373 “Soft” Costs 25% $ 287,288 $1,496,813 Page 116 of 124 DEBRA J. DOCKERY, ARCHITECT, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, Texas 78205 tel: (210) 225-6130 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT EXPANSION OPTIONS DECEMBER 3, 2024 OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST - 8,000 SF SINGLE STORY ADDITION AND 30 PARKING SPACES REFERENCE QUANTITY UNIT COST DIVISION COST DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PERCENT OF SUB TOTAL 12%375,600$ DIVISION 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 8,000 SF 2$ 12,000$ DIVISION 3 CONCRETE 8,000 SF 30$ 240,000$ DIVISION 4 MASONRY 8,000 SF -$ -$ DIVISION 5 METALS 8,000 SF 20$ 160,000$ DIVISION 6 WOODS, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES 8,000 SF 18$ 144,000$ DIVISION 7 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 8,000 SF 42$ 336,000$ DIVISION 8 OPENINGS 8,000 SF 25$ 200,000$ DIVISION 9 FINISHES 8,000 SF 40$ 320,000$ DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES 8,000 SF 4$ 32,000$ DIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT 8,000 SF 2$ 16,000$ DIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS 8,000 SF 1$ 8,000$ DIVISION 13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 8,000 SF 15$ 120,000$ DIVISION 22 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 8,000 SF 6$ 48,000$ DIVISION 22 PLUMBING 8,000 SF 28$ 224,000$ DIVISION 23 HEATING, VENTILATION AND A/C 8,000 SF 35$ 280,000$ DIVISION 26 ELECTRICAL 8,000 SF 60$ 480,000$ DIVISION 28 FIRE ALARM 8,000 SF 5$ 40,000$ DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK 1 LS 150,000$ 150,000$ DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS CIVIL 1 LS 270,000$ 270,000$ DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVMENTS LANDSCAPE 1 LS 75,000$ 75,000$ ADDITIONAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS ROADWAY 1 LS 110,000$ 110,000$ DIVISION 33 UTILITIES 1 LS 50,000$ 50,000$ ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 3,690,600$ CONTENGENCIES - 15%553,590$ "SOFT" COSTS, DESIGN FEES, MATERIALS TESTING, PERMITS -25%922,650$ TOTAL OPINION OF PROJECT COST NOT INCLUDING LAND COST OR INFLATION 5,166,840$ NOTES: LAND PURCHASE COST NOT INCLUDED. ONE TO TWO ADDITIONAL ACRES ARE NEEDED INFLATION TO BID DATE IS NOT INCLUDED (BID DATE UNKNOWN) ON SITE STORM WATER DETENTION WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FIRE LANE TURN AROUND OR SECOND VEHICLE EGRESS WILL BE REQUIRED MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS ASSUMED TO BE SAME AS CURRENT FACILITY - PRE ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING, EXTERIOR METAL WALL PANEL AND ROOFING, STANDARD OFFICE INTERIOR FINISH-OUT Page 117 of 124 Page 118 of 124 DEBRA J. DOCKERY, ARCHITECT, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, Texas 78205 tel: (210) 225-6130 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT EXPANSION OPTIONS DECEMBER 3, 2024 REFERENCE QUANTITY UNIT COST DIVISION COST DIVISION 1 GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PERCENT OF SUB TOTAL 12%343,267$ DIVISION 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4,480 SF 2$ 6,720$ DIVISION 3 CONCRETE 4,480 SF 42$ 188,160$ DIVISION 4 MASONRY - SF -$ -$ DIVISION 5 METALS 8,480 SF 45$ 381,600$ DIVISION 6 WOODS, PLASTICS AND COMPOSITES 4,480 SF 20$ 89,600$ DIVISION 7 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION 8,480 SF 53$ 449,440$ DIVISION 8 OPENINGS 4,480 SF 25$ 112,000$ DIVISION 9 FINISHES 4,480 SF 40$ 179,200$ DIVISION 10 SPECIALTIES 4,480 SF 6$ 26,880$ DIVISION 11 EQUIPMENT 4,480 SF 4$ 17,920$ DIVISION 12 FURNISHINGS 4,480 SF 2$ 8,960$ DIVISION 13 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 4,480 SF 20$ 89,600$ DIVISION 14 CONVEYING SYSTEMS 8,480 SF 25$ 212,000$ DIVISION 22 FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM 8,480 SF 6$ 50,880$ DIVISION 22 PLUMBING 8,480 SF 30$ 254,400$ DIVISION 23 HEATING, VENTILATION AND A/C 4,480 SF 40$ 179,200$ DIVISION 26 ELECTRICAL 4,480 SF 70$ 313,600$ DIVISION 28 FIRE ALARM 4,480 SF 5$ 22,400$ DIVISION 31 EARTHWORK 1 LS 140,000$ 140,000$ DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS CIVIL 1 LS 300,000$ 300,000$ DIVISION 32 EXTERIOR IMPROVMENTS LANDSCAPE 1 LS 75,000$ 75,000$ ADDITIONAL SITE IMPROVEMENTS ROADWAY 1 LS 90,000$ 90,000$ DIVISION 33 UTILITIES 1 LS 50,000$ 50,000$ ROUGH ORDER OF MADNITUDE CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 3,580,827$ CONTINGENCIES - 15%537,124$ "SOFT" COSTS, DESIGN FEES, MATERIALS TESTING, PERMITS -25%895,207$ TOTAL OPINION OF PROJECT COST NOT INCLUDIING LAND COST OR INFLATION 5,013,158$ NOTES: SQUARE FOOTAGE INCREASED TO ACCOUNT FOR ELEVATOR AND 2 STAIRS LAND PURCHASE COST NOT INCLUDED - AT LEAST ONE ADDITIONAL ACRE NEEDED INFLATION TO BID DATE NOT IKNCLUDED (BID DATE UNKNOWN) SECOND FLOOR NOT FINISHED OUT AT THIS TIME. NO A/C. LIMITED ELECTRICAL, NO PLUMBING. ON-SITE STORM WATER DETENTION WILL LIKELY BE REQUIRED FIRE LANE TURN AROUND OR SECOND VEHICLE EGRESS WILL BE REQUIRED MATERIALS AND SYSTEMS ASSUMED TO BE SAME AS CURRENT FACILITY - PRE ENGINEERED METAL BUILDING, EXTERIOR METAL WALL PANEL AND ROOFING, STANDARD OFFICE INTERIOR FINISH-OUT OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST - 8,960 TOTAL SF TWO STORY ADDITION (4,480 SF PER FLOOR) AND 30 PARKING SPACES, FUTURE FINISH OUT OF 2ND STORY Page 119 of 124 Page 120 of 124 DEBRA J. DOCKERY, ARCHITECT, P.C. 118 Broadway, Suite 516 San Antonio, Texas 78205 tel: (210) 225-6130 GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT EXPANSION OPTIONS DECEMBER 3, 2024 REFERENCE QUANTITY UNIT COST DIVISION COST THREE STORY MAIN BUILDING GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PERCENT OF SUB TOTAL 12%272,112$ HVAC REPLACEMENT / REUSE SOME DUCTWORK 21,900 SF 24$ 525,600$ LIGHTING REPLACEMENT 21,900 SF 25$ 547,500$ CEILING REPLACEMENT 21,900 SF 4$ 87,600$ ADD RESTROOMS TO SECOND FLOOR 2 EA 75,000$ 150,000$ RENOVATE RESTROOMS ON FIRST & THIRD FLOORS 4 EA 20,000$ 80,000$ NEW SERVICE COUNTER / PUBLIC LOBBY 1,500 SF 150$ 225,000$ TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SECURITY 21,900 SF 6$ 131,400$ GENERAL PAINTING AND MODEST RENOVATIONS 21,900 SF 10$ 219,000$ REPAVE BASKETBALL COURT FOR PARKING 13,500 SF 9$ 121,500$ ADD PAVING AT BASKETBALL COURT FOR PARKING 9,000 SF 20$ 180,000$ ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 2,539,712$ CONTENGENCIES = 15%380,957$ "SOFT" COSTS, DESIGN FEES, MATERIALS TESTING, PERMITS -25%634,928$ TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST NOT INCLUDING BUILDING PURCHASE OR INFLATION 3,555,597$ NOTES: BUILDING PURCHASE NOT INCLUDED INFLATION TO BID DATE NOT INCLUDED (BID DATE UNKNOWN) ASSUMPTIONS: ROOFING, FIRE SPRINKLER, PLUMBING SYSTEMS AND ELECTRICAL SERVICES REQUIRE NO RENOVATIONS REPAVING AND ADDING TO BASKETBALL COURT TO ACHIEVE 30 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACES (APPROXIMATE EXISTING PARKING - 24 ON MILAM STREET, 19 ON KREZDORN STREET) OPINION OF PROBABLE CONSTRUCTION COST - RENOVATION OF COLLEGE STREET BUILDING Page 121 of 124 REFERENCE QUANTITY UNIT COST DIVISION COST SINGLE STORY CLASSROOM ANNEX AND OLD BAND HALL GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PERCENT OF SUB TOTAL 12%78,466$ HVAC REPLACEMENT 5,290 SF 28$ 148,120$ LIGHTING REPLACEMENT 5,290 SF 30$ 158,700$ CEILING REPLACEMENT 5,290 SF 4$ 21,160$ REPLACE ROOFING 5,290 EA 32$ 169,280$ SCREEN OUTDOOR WALKWAY 100 LF 85$ 8,500$ GENERAL PAINTING AND MINOR RENOVATIONS 5,290 SF 20$ 105,800$ TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SECURITY 5,290 SF 8$ 42,320$ ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 732,346$ CONTENGENCIES = 15%109,852$ "SOFT" COSTS, DESIGN FEES, MATERIALS TESTING, PERMITS -25%183,086$ TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST NOT INCLUDING BUILDING PURCHASE OR INFLATION 1,025,284$ REFERENCE QUANTITY UNIT COST DIVISION COST GYMNASIUM AND CAFETERIA GENERAL REQUIREMENTS PERCENT OF SUB TOTAL 12%114,552$ HVAC REPLACEMENT / REUSE SOME DUCTWORK 8,600 SF 28$ 240,800$ LIGHTING REPLACEMENT 8,600 SF 30$ 258,000$ ROOFING REPAIRS - ELASTOMERIC COATING 8,600 EA 25$ 215,000$ GENERAL PAINTING AND MINOR RENOVATIONS 8,600 SF 20$ 172,000$ TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND SECURITY 8,600 SF 8$ 68,800$ ROUGH ORDER OF MAGNITUDE CONSTRUCTION OPINION OF PROBABLE COST 1,069,152$ CONTENGENCIES = 15%160,373$ "SOFT" COSTS, DESIGN FEES, MATERIALS TESTING, PERMITS -25%267,288$ TOTAL OPINION OF PROBABLE COST NOT INCLUDING BUILDING PURCHASE OR INFLATION 1,496,813$ TOTAL ALL CAMPUS 6,077,693$ Page 122 of 124 Page 123 of 124 Comparison of Facility Projects 8,000 sqft single story addition to existing facility with 30 parking spaces. per SF $645.86 per SF $559.50 per SF $162.36 $0 216 E. College St $1,495,000 $5,602,440 *3 acres $5,050,597 **4acres $5,450,597 ($1,100,000) $3,950,597 $4,350,597 $30,000 $24,000 $51,000 Sale Proceeds: Net Grand Total of Project Option: Estimated Annual Utility Costs: $5,230,958Grand Totals of Project: Project Option 1 Project Option 2 Project Option 3 Total Opinion of Project Cost (Excl. Land Acquisition) Est. Acquisition Cost/ Price Improved Property Est. Land Acquisition Cost/ Price $435,600 1.75 - 2.00 acres 0.75 - 1.00 acres $217,800 Provided below is a summary of three options developed by GAD leadership, to address spacing planning needs of organization, for consideration by GAD Board of Directors. Note: Preliminary discussions have been taken with property owners on acquisition of real property to facilitate project options. Market value of land to be acquired for options 1 & 2 was estimated at $5.00 psf based on knowledge of market conditions. Until a contract for purchase is executed for an agreed to amount, purchase amounts are preliminary estimates only used for purpose of consideration by BOD members. $5,166,840 $5,013,158 $3,555,597 Project Option 1: Project Option 2: Project Option 3: 8,960 Total sqft Two Story addition to existing facility (4,480 sqft per floor) with 30 parking spaces; future finish out of 2nd Floor. Renovation of College Street Building (Three Story Main Bldg). Secondary renovation costs of auxiliary building provided in itemized projected costs for reference purposes. Project Cost Summaries $0 $0 Page 124 of 124 RESOLUTION 25-R-070 APPROVAL OF GUADALUPE APPRAISAL DISTRICT REAL ESTATE ACQUISITION AND RENOVATION OF 216 E. COLLEGE STREET IN SEGUIN, TEXAS AS FUTURE SITE FOR APPRAISAL DISTRICT OPERATIONS WHEREAS, the Texas Property Tax Code, Section 6.051, permits an appraisal district to acquire real property by purchase or lease, convey real property, and construct or renovate buildings or other improvements for the purpose of establishing and operating an appraisal office or branch appraisal office; and WHEREAS, Section 6.051 requires that the board of directors of an appraisal district propose the property transaction by resolution, which must be approved by the governing bodies of three-fourths of the taxing units entitled to vote on the appointment of board members; and WHEREAS, the governing body of City of Schertz received notification of the resolution adopted by the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District as required by Section 6.051; and WHEREAS, the purchase and renovation of the proposed real estate offers the most effective solution to provide the Guadalupe Appraisal District with a permanent location to serve the taxing units and taxpayers of Guadalupe County; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor on this date, by the Governing Body of the City of Schertz : 1.Approval of Acquisition and Renovation: The City of Schertz hereby approves by a majority vote in a public meeting the purchase and renovation project of a building for the Guadalupe Appraisal District's office situated in Guadalupe County, Texas, at 216 E. College Street in Seguin, Texas, as described in approved Resolution 2025-03 of the Board of Directors of the Guadalupe Appraisal District. 2.Allocation of Proceeds from Sale of Existing Office: Any proceeds from the sale of the existing office of the Guadalupe Appraisal District located at 3000 N. Austin Street in Seguin, Texas be allocated to the Guadalupe Appraisal District's dedicated reserve fund for future payments towards the proposed building purchase and renovations. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this document be filed with the Chief Appraiser of the Guadalupe Appraisal District on or before the 30th day after receipt of notification of the aforementioned resolution. PASSED AND APPROVED this _____day of _______________ 2025. City of Schertz Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Agenda No. 7.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 25-S-026 - Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 8, Section 21.8.9 - Outdoor Display and Storage. (B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez) BACKGROUND Per Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 21.4.7, City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, or at the request of the City Manager or his/her designee, may change or modify the UDC in order to establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development. The proposed UDC amendments, which were initiated by the Planning Division Staff, are meant to simplify the categories of outdoor display and storage by amending the definitions and expanding the exceptions. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on June 4, 2025. A public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express" on June 11, 2025. The proposed UDC amendments include modifications to Article 8, Section 21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage; to create new categories of Outdoor Display and Storage, amend definitions, clarify general requirements, and expand exceptions. Proposed Amendments Staff is proposing modifications to the following UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.9 subsections:  Article UDC Section Current UDC Proposed Amendment Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Temporary Outdoor Storage Zoning Districts Change the classification names to Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage. Outdoor Display is permitted in NS, MSMU, GB, GB-2, M-1, and M-2. Outdoor Storage is permitted in GB-2, M-1, and M-2, and requires an SUP in PUB Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.1 Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage of goods in individual packaging and not in storage containers which are associated with the primary business on the site may be allowed adjacent to a front principal building wall and may not extend into the public right-of-way. Such storage shall not be permitted to Modifying the definition of Outdoor display to include items actively for sale or lease typically seen at home improvement businesses which include: pallets of mulch; sod; and block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. prefabricated sheds. Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.2 General outdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of outdoor storage not classified as outdoor display including items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Modifying the definition of Outdoor Storage to expand on the types of items that would not fall under Outdoor Display, which include the items from the previous definition in addition to: unpackaged dirt; landscape materials; and other items sold in bulk associated with wholesale business. Outdoor Storage items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. Article 8 Section 21.8.9.; Specifically 21.8.9.B.4. Exceptions included vehicles for sale, flea markets, and special provisions for vehicles/ food trucks for material delays during the pandemic. Exceptions expanded to include Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, Outdoor Sales, and Sidewalk Sales. Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.3. 3. Outdoor Display and Storage Requirementsa. All outdoor display and storage areas must be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property.b. Unless specifically authorized elsewhere in the City's ordinances, all outdoor display and storage areas shall be located outside the public right-of-wa Moved to the top of the UDC Section and placed under General Requirements. 1. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; 2. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property, additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require an Amended Site Plan; 3. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and 4. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements.   Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Section 21.8.9.C. Effective Dates Removal of the effective dates section. Article 7 of the UDC lists the nonconforming uses, lots, and structures regulations. GOAL To amend Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 8- Outdoor Display and Storage. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When considering UDC amendments, staff considers the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.4.7.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City;  Staff proposes UDC amendments from time to time to proactively better the Unified Development Code that governs development within the City of Schertz. UDC Section 21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Storage has not been reviewed since the pandemic to implement pandemic-specific regulations, and before that, it had not been reviewed since its implementation in 2010.  2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the UDC and the City; The purpose and intent of the UDC is to ensure the safe, orderly, and efficient development and expansion of the City. By being proactive with these proposed UDC amendments, Staff can provide clarification on questions and issues that have arisen over the years with the interpretation of the ordinance. The UDC must be amended to keep up with the changing retail and commercial environments. The Main-Street Mixed-Use (MSMU) zoning district was adopted after the adoption of the Outdoor Display and Storage section, which resulted in exclusion from opportunities that can come from outdoor display in commercial areas.  With the proposed UDC amendments, MSMU zoning is included in the permitted use table for Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage. Additionally, the expansion of the exclusions within Section 21.8.9 further clarifies what falls under Outdoor Display versus Outdoor Storage, which is a frequent question businesses have. Commercial businesses have also indicated a desire to have the ability to include Outdoor Display, which is not allowed with the current UDC language for Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage.  3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law; and Section 21.8.9 was last amended in 2022, with Ordinance 22-S-19, in response to the pandemic. The proposed UDC changes meet the needs of the changing commercial environment by adding garden centers and sidewalk sales to the exclusions and providing clarity to the definitions of Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage, which in turn allows for businesses that may not have been allowed before per our UDC. 4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed amendments. The Planning and Zoning Commission requested an amendment to the Outdoor Storage height limits to exempt heavy equipment. The original Outdoor Storage height limits are 20-feet but do not specify if that restriction applies to equipment such as cranes. With the requested changes, staff included language that exempts heavy equipment from the 20-foot height exemption due to the nature of the equipment. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation:  Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 25-S-026. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission met on June 4, 2025, held a public hearing, and made a recommendation of approval with amendments to City Council with a unanimous vote.  Attachments Ordinance 25-S-026 With Attachments  UDC Section 21.8.9-Outdoor Display and Storage- CLEAN  UDC Section 21.8.9-Outdoor Display and Storage- REDLINES  City Council Presentation Slides  ORDINANCE 25-S-026 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC), ARTICLE 8, SECTION 21.8.9 OUTDOOR DISPLAY AND STORAGE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10-S-06, the City of Schertz (the “City”) adopted and Amended and Restated the Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the “Current UDC”); and WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2025, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council of approval with amendments; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that proposed amendments are appropriate and are in the best interest of the public safety, health, and welfare. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6.. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7.. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED AND APPROVED this ____day of ________ 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit “A” Proposed Unified Development Code (UDC) Amendments Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 2 Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non-residential Districts ancillary to a primary use in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non -residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS & MSMU GB and PUB GB-2, M-1 and M-2 Outdoor Display - P P P Outdoor Storage - - -*Not Permitted in GB * Requires a SUP in PUB P (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated (-) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. General Requirements for all Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Items 1. All areas storing merchandise, equipment, materials, or any other Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage items shall: a. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; b. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require and Amended Site Plan; c. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and d. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. C. Categories of Outdoor Storage and Display. 1. Outdoor Display . Outdoor Display are items actively for sale or lease that can be perused by the public. Outdoor Display includes items typically seen at home improvement businesses or similar type retail/ commercial businesses. Outdoor Display includes items such as pallets of mulch or sod and prefabricated sheds or trailers a. Individual items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed fifteen feet (15’) in height. b. Stacked items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed five feet (5’) in height. c. The Outdoor Display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary building square footage. 2. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor Storage consists of all remaining forms of Outdoor Storage not classified as Outdoor Display. Outdoor Storage includes, but is not limited to, items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Outdoor Storage also consists of items for sale to include items sold in bulk such as unpackaged dirt, landscape materials, or items associated with a wholesale business. Outdoor Storage Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 2 items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. a. Outdoor Storage is prohibited within public right-of-way or fire lanes. b. Outdoor Storage shall not be allowed in off-street parking spaces. c. Outdoor Storage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height, except for heavy equipment. d. Outdoor Storage items shall be enclosed or shall be located at the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right -of-way. 3. Exceptions. a. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. b. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. c. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicles awaiting repair, food trucks and trailers associated with a business may apply for a permit to allow parking on an unpaved area for a period not to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. 1) The City Manager or his/her designee shall receive applications, documentation and issue permits for the temporary parking on unpaved areas during construction or other unique circumstances such as parts shortages as the result of a pandemic. e. Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, and Outdoor Storage Sales Areas are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if the area: 1) is attached to and accessible through the primary building; 2) is enclosed utilizing a metal or steel fence material such as wrought iron with masonry columns, chain link is not permitted; and 3) is identified on an approved site plan. f. Sidewalk Sales are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if: 1) the items for sale are located in front of or adjacent to the primary building and on the pedestrian walkway; and 2) all items for sale are stored inside the primary building overnight. Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 2 Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non-residential Districts ancillary to a primary use in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non -residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS & MSMU GB and PUB GB-2, M-1 and M-2 Outdoor Display - P P P Outdoor Storage - - -*Not Permitted in GB * Requires a SUP in PUB P (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated (-) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. General Requirements for all Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Items 1. All areas storing merchandise, equipment, materials, or any other Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage items shall: a. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; b. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require and Amended Site Plan; c. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and d. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. C. Categories of Outdoor Storage and Display. 1. Outdoor Display . Outdoor Display are items actively for sale or lease that can be perused by the public. Outdoor Display includes items typically seen at home improvement businesses or similar type retail/ commercial businesses. Outdoor Display includes items such as pallets of mulch or sod and prefabricated sheds or trailersa. Individual items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed fifteen feet (15’) in height. b. Stacked items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed five feet (5’) in height. c. The Outdoor Display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary building square footage. 2. Outdoor Storage. a. Outdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of Outdoor Storage not classified as Outdoor Display. Outdoor Storage includes, but is not limited to, items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Outdoor Storage also consists of items for sale to include items sold in bulk such as unpackaged dirt, landscape materials, or items associated with a wholesale business. Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 2 Outdoor Storage items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. b. Outdoor Storage is prohibited within public right-of-way or fire lanes. c. Outdoor Storage shall not be allowed in off-street parking spaces. d. Outdoor Storage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height, except for heavy equipment. e. Outdoor Storage items shall be enclosed or shall be located at the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right -of-way. 3. Exceptions. a. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. b. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. c. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicles awaiting repair, food trucks and trailers associated with a business may apply for a permit to allow parking on an unpaved area for a period not to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. 1) The City Manager or his/her designee shall receive applications, documentation and issue permits for the temporary parking on unpaved areas during construction or other unique circumstances such as parts shortages as the result of a pandemic. e. Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, and Outdoor Storage Sales Areas are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if the area: 1) is attached to and accessible through the primary building; 2) is enclosed utilizing a metal or steel fence material such as wrought iron with masonry columns, chain link is not permitted; and 3) is identified on an approved site plan. f. Sidewalk Sales are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if: 1) the items for sale are located in front of or adjacent to the primary building and on the pedestrian walkway; and 2) all items for sale are stored inside the primary building overnight. Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 3 Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non-residential Districts ancillary to a primary use in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non-residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor storage and displaydisplay and outdoor storage shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS & MSMU GB and PUB GB-2, M-1 and M-2 Outdoor Display and Tempo- rary Outdoor Storage - P P P General Outdoor Storage - - -*Not Permitted in GB * Requires a SUP in PUB P (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated (-) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. General Requirements for all Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Items 1. All areas storing merchandise, equipment, materials, or any other Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage items shall: a. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; b. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require and Amended Site Plan; c. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and d. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. C. Categories of Ooutdoor Sstorage and Ddisplay. 1. Outdoor Display and Temporary Outdoor Storage. Outdoor Ddisplay and temporary outdoor storage are displays of items actively for sale or lease that can be perused by the public. Outdoor Display includes items typically seen at home improvement businesses or similar type retail/ commercial businesses. Outdoor Display includes items such as pallets of mulch or sod and prefabricated sheds or trailers are lightweight and that individually can be easily moved without a mechanical lifting device. a. Individual items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed fifteen feet (15’) in height.Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage of goods in individual packaging and not in storage containers which are associated with the primary business on the site may be allowed adjacent to a front principal building wall and may not extend into the public right-of-way. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 3 b. Stacked items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed five feet (5’) in height.Areas intended for outdoor display must be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off -street parking areas. No outdoor displays shall be allowed in off -street parking areas or fire lanes. c. The Outdoor Display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary building square footage. 2. General Outdoor Storage. a. General Ooutdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of Ooutdoor Sstorage not classified as Ooutdoor Ddisplay. Outdoor Storage includes, but is not limited to, including items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Outdoor Storage also consists of items for sale to include items sold in bulk such as unpackaged dirt, landscape materials, or items associated with a wholesale business. Outdoor Storage items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. b. General Ooutdoor Sstorage is prohibited within the public right-of-way or fire lanes. c. General Ooutdoor Sstorage shall not be allowed in off-street parking spaces. d. General Ooutdoor Sstorage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height , except for heavy equipment. e. General Ooutdoor Sstorage items shall be completely enclosed or shall be moved located atto the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right-of-way. 3. Outdoor Display and Storage Requirements. a. All outdoor display and storage areas must be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property. b. Unless specifically authorized elsewhere in the City's ordinances, all outdoor display and storage areas shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 34. Exceptions. a. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. b. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. c. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicles awaiting repair, food trucks and trailers associated with a business may apply for a permit to allow parking on an unpaved area for a period not to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. 1) The City Manager or his/her designee shall receive applications, documentation and issue permits for the temporary parking on unpaved areas during construction or other unique circumstances such as parts shortages as the result of a pandemic. e. Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, and Outdoor Storage Sales Areas are not considered Out door Display or Outdoor Storage if the area: Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 3 1) is attached to and accessible through the primary building; 2) is enclosed utilizing a metal or steel fence material such as wrought iron with masonry columns, chain link is not permitted; and 3) is identified on an approved site plan. f. Sidewalk Sales are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if: 1) the items for sale are located in front of or adjacent to the primary building and on the pedestrian walkway; and 2) all items for sale are stored inside the primary building overnight. C. Effective Dates. 1. Temporary Limited Non-Conforming Use. Outdoor displays or outdoor storage (temporary or general) described in subsection 21.8.9.B. located on a site on April 30, 2010; in compliance with the provisions of this UDC as in effect on April 12, 2010; and in good working order and actively being us ed for its intended display or storage purpose on April 30, 2010 may remain in the same location on such site, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.B. until the earliest to occur of the following: a. the removal of such display or storage from its precise location on April 30, 2010; or b. the failure of the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage to operate or use such display or storage in the manner intended and in effect on April 30, 2010 for a period of three (3) consecutive business days; or c. the reduction in height of any such display or storage that would be governed by subsection 21.8.9.B.2.d. to less than 20 feet (20'); or d. the destruction or damage of such display or storage to the extent of twenty -five (25%) or more of its area or value; or e. December 31, 2013. During such period, the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage may perform minor repair or maintenance of such display or storage and may replace any unit of such display offered for sale or lease that is sold or leased with a like unit offered for sale or lease but shall not substitute other types of items for sale or lease in such display, and shall not replace, enlarge or substitute storage facilities or storage areas that do not comply with subsection 21.8.9.B. In all events, none of such displays or storage shall be in a condition of disrepair or non-operation. 2. Other Outdoor Displays or Outdoor Storage. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage not described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be in compliance with the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.B. on and after May 1, 2010. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be discontinued within thirty (30) days after the earliest to occur of the condition described in subsections 21.8.9.C.1.a.—e. (Ord. No. 22-S-19, § 1(Exh. A), 4-26-2022) Ordinance 25-S-026 UDC Article 8 -Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Daisy Marquez| Planner Proposed Amendments Article 8-UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 2 •to create new categories of Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage, • amend definitions, • clarify general requirements, •expand exceptions Proposed Amendments Article 8- UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 3 Existing Proposed Proposed Amendments Article 8- UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 4 Proposed Proposed Amendments Article 8- UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 5 Proposed Outdoor Display Proposed Amendments Article 8- UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 6 Proposed Outdoor Storage Added after P&Z Proposed Amendments Article 8- UDC Section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage 7 Proposed Exceptions 8 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval •Section 21.8.9 was last updated during the pandemic, •Before that it has not been revised since its implementation in 2010 9 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the UDC and the City; UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval •Staff is being proactive •Keep up with the changing retail and commercial environments •Commercial businesses have shown a desire for Outdoor Display •MSMU was not in place during the implementation of UDC Section 21.8.9 10 3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law; and UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval •Clarifying Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage definitions •Expansion of Exceptions 11 4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval •Staff has ensured the UDC amendment meets the UDC requirements •The Planning and Zoning Commission requested an exemption on the height restriction for heavy equipment Recommendation Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 25-S-026. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item and made a recommendation of approval, with amendments to City Council with a unanimous vote. 12 Agenda No. 8.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 25-S-027 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas) BACKGROUND Per the applicant letter of intent, the property requesting a rezone is approximately 19 acres of land from Single Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5), with a proposal to be developed into multifamily style senior housing with a proposed density of 7.65 DU (dwelling units) per acre.  On May 23, 2025, nineteen (19) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property and the Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District (SCUCISD). At the time of the Staff Report, four (4) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and four (4) responses in opposition have been received. A public hearing was published in the "San Antonio Express" on June 11, 2025. Additionally, a sign was placed on the subject property by the applicant. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A)Residence / Open Space Proposed Middle Denisty Residential District (R-5)Multi-Family Apartment Dwelling Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North General Business District (GB), Public Use District (PUB) Single-Family Residential / Agricultural (R-A) Undeveloped and Elevated Water Storage Tank (Civic Use) South Right-of-Way Old Wiederstein Road East Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) and General Business District (GB) Residence and Undeveloped West Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A)Residence GOAL The goal is to rezone this property to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) to be developed into multifamily style senior housing with a proposed density of 7.65 DU (dwelling units) per acre.  However, it should be noted that while the applicant intends to develop this property with a 7.65 dwelling units per acre, the zoning district does allow up to 12 dwelling units per acre for a development of this size. The zoning district also allows for attached or detached residential dwelling units and that multifamily site design requirements in Article 9 of the UDC be adhered to. Finally, the applicant must provide ten percent (10%) of the total platted area as common, usable open space.     Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size and Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code District Area SqFt Width Ft Depth Ft Front Ft Side Ft Rear Ft Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Existing R-A Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural 21,780 N/A N/A 25 25 25 2 35 50% Proposed R-5 Middle Density Residential District 10,890 N/A N/A 25 10 10 2 35 80% COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, Staff utilizes the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Mixed Use Center. This designation is intended to provide a mixture of commercial and residential, with specific call-outs for higher densities. By requesting Middle Density Residential District (R-5), the applicant is meeting that higher density provision and thus implementing the policies of the Comprehensive Plan.  2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City As part of promoting health, safety, and general welfare, zone change requests should align with the Unified Development Code (UDC) and city policy. The Schertz strategic plan has stated goals and objectives for a thriving economy. Among these are to "support strategic development" and "effectively plan and manage land use". This zone change request builds on the development occurring in the wider area. To the west is a large mixed-use development called Schertz Station currently under construction. This development consists of multifamily housing and several commercial options ranging from restaurants to retail. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan details the need for Complete Communities, which "is a concept built on the premise that people should be able to go about all of their essential daily activities and needs within a short distance of their home". "Strategies to achieve this include more dense development, diversity of housing choices and land uses", the proposed zone change for the subject property helps the City achieve this goal based on what is occurring in the wider area.  Finally, the UDC states the explicit purpose to "minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings". The density that is provided by Middle Density Residential District (R-5) helps create a transitional use between the properties that are more open, rural, and less dense to the east, and the denser development occurring to the west in Schertz Station. As part of this proposed zoning request, the applicant submitted a preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) memo which the City of Schertz Engineering Department reviewed and provided the following:   A preliminary traffic analysis has been done to evaluate the potential impact the adjacent streets by the proposed zone change.  The analysis compared the maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips that could be generated from this property based on the current zoning and the maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips that could be generated form this property if the zoning was changed to the requested zoning.  The difference between these two peak hour trip totals is 54 vehicle trips.  This amount of proposed additional trips is well below the threshold for triggering a full Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development.  Additionally, the increased amount is generally considered a very small increase relative to the street capacity and existing traffic volumes.  Therefore, the proposed impact to the City’s transportation system by the proposed zone change would be considered negligible. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; The immediate area consists of open space, rural residences, single-family subdivisions, and a large mixed-use development. The uses permitted in Middle Density Residential District (R-5) are detailed below.     UDC Section 21.5.8 Permitted Uses Middle Density Residential District (R-5) Permitted by Right Permitted with SUP Accessory Building, Residential Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Multi-Family Apartment Dwelling Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Attached One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Two-Family Dwelling Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship New and Unlisted Uses These uses show a focus on residential which is consistent with the immediate area.  4. Whether other factors deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. All UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change. City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have been notified of the zone change and have provided no objections to the request. SCUCISD has also been notified of the zone change request. The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. RECOMMENDATION Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposal's alignment with the UDC and city policy, and it's consistency with the immediate area, Staff is recommending approval of Ord. 25-S-027. The City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2025 and made a recommendation of approval with a 6-1 vote. Commissioner Brown was the nay vote. Attachments Ord. 25-S-027 with Exhibits  Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  PH Responses  Zoning Exhibit  SCUC ISD 10- Year Forecasting  SCUC ISD Demographic Report  City Council Presentation Slides  ORDINANCE 25-S-027 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 19 ACRES OF LAND FROM SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (R-A) TO MIDDLE DENSITY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-5) KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 68302, AND 68303, ALSO KNOWN AS 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN ROAD, CITY OF SCHERTZ, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application for a request to rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R- 5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, more specifically described in the Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached herein (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zoning (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2025, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested zoning; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B, is hereby zoned to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as t o the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED and ADOPTED, this ____day of ________ 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheree Courney, Deputy City Secretary Exhibit “A” Zoning Exhibit GB GB GH GH GB PUB GB M-1 R-5 R-A R-A City o f C i b o l o City o f S c h e r t z C i t y o f C i b o l o City o f S c h e r t z C i b o l o E T J CRUS A D E R B E N D PILL O R Y P O I N T E H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T WILLO W BRAN C H B E L M O N T P K W Y PECAN S T SECRE T A R I A T D R PINE S T SUMM I T D R HOUR L E S S O A K S SIR B A R T O N B A Y W I L L O W W O O D T R I P L E C R O W N H O P E L N DEN-OT T H I L L ROSE D R ELM S T BIRCH S T GRENAD A G A I T PVT R D A T 4 8 1 D E A N R D K A Y L E E C H A S E OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D F O X F O R D R U N D R D E A N R D GB R-A M-1 GB GH GH PUB GB GB City o f C i b o l o City o f S c h e r t z C i t y o f C i b o l o City o f S c h e r t z C i b o l o E T J CRUS A D E R B E N D PILL O R Y P O I N T E H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T WILLO W BRAN C H B E L M O N T P K W Y PECAN S T SECRE T A R I A T D R PINE S T SUMM I T D R HOUR L E S S O A K S SIR B A R T O N B A Y W I L L O W W O O D T R I P L E C R O W N H O P E L N DEN-OT T H I L L ROSE D R ELM S T BIRCH S T GRENAD A G A I T PVT R D A T 4 8 1 D E A N R D K A Y L E E C H A S E OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D F O X F O R D R U N D R D E A N R D 0 200 400 600 800 1,000100 Feet : (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-5) Middle Density Residential (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) Schertz Municipal Boundary City ETJ GUADALUPE COUNTY PARCEL ID: 68301 & 68302 PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSEDCURRENT *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* Last update: May 14, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Department: gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1180 !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !( U U U U U U U U U U U 61135 HERNANDEZ GILBERT 61136 SELF KENNETH R & SARA K 2 4 0 1 8 B U R N E T T L O U A 2 4 0 4 6 S P E E R G A B R I E L S H A Y N E 24 0 3 2 , 2 4 0 4 2 , 2 4 0 4 3 CI T Y O F S C H E R T Z 24053, 24054, 2 4 0 5 5 BLUM ANNIE G L I V I N G TRUST 2406 0 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 1 6 6 8 6 5 G O M E Z D A V I D & T E R E S A C 61134 HERNANDEZ RUBEN R 61130 HERNANDEZ GILBERT 68304 BUSCH TODD M 2404 4 , 2 4 0 4 4 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 6 8 3 2 4 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 68294 DENSBERGER HAROLD J 68319 DENSBERGER DIANA OTT ETAL 68330 TUDYK JOSEPH B JR 6 8 3 3 1 T U D Y K J O S E P H B J R 68302 JASEK DOUGLAS E & NOREEN A BAKER & JOHN H JASEK 68303 JASEK DOUGLAS E & NOREEN A BAKER & JOHN H JASEK 24051 , 2 4 0 5 2 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 24056 BALD E R A S J O S E GUAD A L U P E 2406 2 CRID E R WHITN E Y 2 4 0 3 1 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 2 4 0 4 7 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 24061 MATA M O R O S VERO N I C A 24059 GONZ A L E Z GONZ A L O L 2405 8 ESPIN O Z A JOSE V J R 2405 7 GARC I A ADRI A N 24 " WL 16" W L 8" W L 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 8" W L 8 " W L 8" WL 24" WL 1 6 " W L 1 6 " W L 8" W L 8" P V C SDR 3 5 8" PV C S D R 3 5 8" PV C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PV C SDR 3 5 8" PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" PV C SDR 2 6 8" PV C SDR 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C SD R 3 5 8" PVC SDR 35 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 2 4 " P V C S D R 2 6 R e s i d e n t i a l C o l l e c t o r ( 7 0 ' R O W ) Seco n d a r y A r t e r i a l (90' R O W ) Pl a n n e d S e c o n d a r y Art e r i a l ( 9 0 ' R O W ) Maxar, Microsoft Project Boundary 200' Buffer City ETJ Parcels County Boundaries Sewer Structures [Ú Lift Station (Active) [Ú Lift Station (Private) [Ú Lift Station (Schertz) !¤!2 Split Manhole 3Q Treatment Plant (CCMA) 3Q Treatment Plant (Schertz) Sewer Main Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes Water Main 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" g Unknown Streets Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Railroads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Residential Collector Planned Residential Collector Commercial Collector B Planned Commercial Collector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A <all other values>:0 200 400 600100 Feet 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (PLZC20250105) City o f S c h e r t z City o f S c h e r t z City o f C i b o l o City o f C i b o l o O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 1 1 3 5 ) 1 9 0 2 1 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 1 1 3 6 ) 2 4 0 0 T U L I P S T ( 2 4 0 1 8 ) 2 4 0 1 B I R C H S T ( 2 4 0 3 1 ) 2 4 0 8 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 6 ) 2 4 0 5 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 2 ) 5305 HOPE L N (2405 4 ) 2 4 0 0 B I R C H S T ( 2 4 0 3 2 ) 2 4 0 9 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 1 ) 2 4 0 4 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 5 ) 2 4 1 2 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 7 ) 1 9 0 9 4 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 1 6 6 8 6 5 ) 1 8 9 6 7 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 1 1 3 4 ) 1 8 9 7 5 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 1 1 3 0 ) O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 8 3 0 4 ) 2 4 0 0 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 4 ) 2 3 0 4 T U L I P S T ( 6 8 3 2 4 ) 2300DEN- O T T H I L L (6829 4 ) 2305DEN- O T T H I L L (6831 9 ) 1 8 9 4 0 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 8 3 3 0 ) 1 8 9 4 0 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 8 3 3 1 ) 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (68302 & 68303) 2 3 2 8 T U L I P S T ( 2 4 0 5 3 ) 2 3 2 4 T U L I P S T ( 2 4 0 5 2 ) 5213 HOPE L N (2405 6 ) 2 3 2 0 T U L I P S T ( 2 4 0 5 1 ) 5209 HOPE L N (2405 7 ) 5205 HOPE L N (2405 8 ) 5201 HOPE L N (2405 9 ) 5105 HOPE L N (2406 1 ) 5101 HOPE L N (2406 2 ) 5109 HOPE L N (2405 9 ) 5301 HOPE L N (2405 4 ) 2 4 0 1 E L M S T ( 2 4 0 4 3 ) H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T F O X F O R D R U N D R PINE S T HOURL E S S O A K S SIR BARTO N BAY PILLO R Y P O I N T E T R I P L E C R O W N DEN-OT T H I L L ELM S T BIRCH S T OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D D E A N R D 4 0 200 400 600 800100 Feet City of Schertz 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (PLZC20250105) Project Area 200' Buffer Municipal Boundaries “The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be made and information may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.” City of Schertz, GIS Department, gis@schertz.com Last Update: May 14, 2025 From: Jasek, Douglas <Doug.Jasek@chevron.com> Sent: Sunday, June 1, 2025 11:34 AM To: planning Cc: Jasek, Douglas Subject: PLZC20250105 Public Hearing Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Samuel, This email is to record my reply in favor of the request for PLZC20250105 [rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (RA) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas]. I (along with my siblings) am one of the co-owners of the above referenced property (19018 Old Wiederstein Rd.), and believe that this would be a beneficial use to the community with a lower traffic impact than the previous plans. Thanks. Doug Douglas E. (Doug) Jasek, P.E. Manager – Houston Technical Team / Sr. RM Leader / PE PDR Doug.jasek@chevron.com SAC/PZ Asset Development Saudi Arabian Chevron Inc. 1400 Smith Street Houston, TX 77002-7327 HOU140/31048 Tel 832-854-3193 CTN 8-854-3193 Mobile 281-216-2261 Fax 832-854-3423 FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (C URRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 3Q24 Demographic Report 2 Annual Enrollment Change *Yellow Box = largest grade per year Green Box = second largest grade per year Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2024/25 384 747 849 866 1,006 1,043 1,108 1,118 1,126 1,198 1,413 1,427 1,354 1,225 14,864 Difference 60 -10 -35 29 -17 -25 13 -2 -14 34 56 -24 40 -23 82 18.5%-1.1%-3.4%2.8%-1.6%-2.2%1.1%-0.2%-1.1%2.8%4.3%-1.7%3.1%-1.8%0.5% 3-year avg.0.992 0.924 1.028 1.025 1.026 1.023 0.984 1.023 1.020 1.029 1.127 0.975 0.928 0.995 1.005 1.004 1.025 1.006 Cohorts PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Elem Int Mid High 2021/22 1.400 0.983 1.048 1.000 1.033 1.036 0.990 1.068 1.045 1.056 1.171 1.042 0.936 0.969 1.020 1.029 1.050 1.029 2022/23 0.958 0.876 1.029 1.001 1.057 1.037 0.956 1.008 1.007 1.015 1.121 0.960 0.926 0.983 1.000 0.982 1.011 0.998 2023/24 0.986 0.962 1.023 1.005 0.999 1.012 0.969 1.028 1.040 1.028 1.099 0.987 0.903 1.031 1.000 0.998 1.034 1.005 2024/25 1.033 0.935 1.033 1.068 1.023 1.021 1.028 1.034 1.014 1.046 1.162 0.978 0.955 0.971 1.016 1.031 1.030 1.017 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Oct-24 Oct-23 3 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.9 3.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p - 1 9 No v - 1 9 Ja n - 2 0 Ma r - 2 0 Ma y - 2 0 Ju l - 2 0 Se p - 2 0 No v - 2 0 Ja n - 2 1 Ma r - 2 1 Ma y - 2 1 Ju l - 2 1 Se p - 2 1 No v - 2 1 Ja n - 2 2 Ma r - 2 2 Ma y - 2 2 Ju l - 2 2 Se p - 2 2 No v - 2 2 Ja n - 2 3 Ma r - 2 3 Ma y - 2 3 Ju l - 2 3 Se p - 2 3 No v - 2 3 Ja n - 2 4 Ma r - 2 4 Ma y - 2 4 Ju l - 2 4 Se p - 2 4 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Oct 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 17,441 17,992 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q3 2015Q3 2016Q3 2017Q3 2018Q3 2019Q3 2020Q3 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings San Antonio New Home Closings Source: Zonda Key Trends Starts: +29% YOY / +1% QOQ Closings: -5% YOY / -4% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 551 Homes 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –3Q24 * Based on additional research by Zonda Education ** Totals DO NOT include age-restricted communities Rank District Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,637 3,710 1,999 6,305 21,310 2 COMAL ISD 2,442 2,704 1,776 4,918 24,373 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,202 2,382 1,217 4,596 31,031 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,222 2,055 1,254 4,560 24,573 5 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,333 1,203 739 2,317 7,002 6 JUDSON ISD 679 941 308 508 969 7 SCHERTZ CIBOLO ISD*770 831 442 1,939 6,169 8 NAVARRO ISD 834 810 482 1,253 6,877 9 BOERNE ISD 784 768 555 1,264 9,651 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 706 731 298 964 16,713 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 610 618 388 767 6,366 12 NORTH EAST ISD 347 342 220 899 5,316 13 SEGUIN ISD 318 321 250 588 5,519 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 247 222 162 160 720 15 MARION ISD 194 166 111 264 4,352 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 127 139 54 205 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 70 100 138 327 688 18 LYTLE ISD 88 73 50 334 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 49 64 25 83 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 4 39 23 16 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings by Quarter Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 612 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 684 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 85 19 110 27 29 52 275 238 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 4 0 1 0 1 3 41 242 ROSE GARDEN 205 57 226 38 86 126 680 2,722 SCHERTZ 0 0 23 2 0 1 0 60 SIPPEL 288 63 227 64 89 151 637 1,556 WATTS 53 7 93 26 14 28 23 580 WIEDERSTEIN 135 17 151 43 28 81 283 771 Grand Total 770 163 831 200 247 442 1,939 6,169 •The district has 24 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions •265 lots were delivered in the 3rd quarter 9 District Housing Overview Residential Activity 10 Grace Valley •868 total lots •574 future lots •159 vacant developed lots •31 homes under construction •97 occupied homes •Started 115 homes in last 12 months, started 28 homes in 3Q24 •Streets being paved for 162 lots in Phase 2 •Lennar •$237K+ •Current Student Yield = .20 Nov 2024 Nov 2024Residential Activity 11 Carmel Ranch •127 total lots •120 vacant developed lots •7 homes under construction •All lots delivered for homebuilding 3Q24 •Anticipate first homes Spring 2025 •Meritage Homes •$402K+ Saddlebrook Ranch •635 total lots •467 future lots •164 vacant developed lots •4 homes under construction •First homes started 3Q24 •Groundwork underway on 132 lots in Phase 4 & 6 •Ashton Woods Homes •$360K+ Residential Activity 12 Clearwater Creek •1,156 total future lots •Initial groundwork underway on 104 lots in Phase 1 •Lennar Nov 2024 13 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family Market-September 2024 14 District Multifamily Overview •There are more than 600 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes •There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district Residential Activity 15 Schertz Station •318 single-family rental homes under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 Residential Activity 16 Aviator 1518 •300 apartment units under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 •There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district •The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 17 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 18 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 19 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12)827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13)862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14)937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15)985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16)989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17)995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18)1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19)982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20)1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21)951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22)935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23)819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24)788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25)739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26)699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27)763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28)750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29)776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD KG Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 20 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 -107 -0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 -221 -1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 -209 -1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 -172 -1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 -197 -1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 -63 -0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 -89 -0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 -165 -1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 -41 -0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 -5 0.0% 21 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change -4.17%-3.35%-1.80%-1.18%0.72%1.06%2.22%1.44%1.75%1.72%1.91% Elementary Absolute Change -213 -164 -85 -55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%-0.40%-3.73%-2.61%-4.69%-5.02%-3.97%2.48%2.85%0.47%2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 -9 -83 -56 -98 -100 -75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change -4.01%-2.01%4.31%-0.96%-3.96%-2.68%-4.73%-4.73%-4.02%2.43%2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change -98 -47 99 -23 -94 -61 -105 -100 -81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92%2.07%-2.72%-1.38%-0.24%-1.59%0.25%-1.95%-4.30%-3.68%-4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 -152 -75 -13 -85 13 -103 -222 -182 -203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change -1.32%-0.72%-1.49%-1.43%-1.19%-1.38%-0.45%-0.64%-1.19%-0.30%-0.04% District Absolute Change -200 -107 -221 -209 -172 -197 -63 -89 -165 -41 -5 22 Key Takeaways If the current trend continues, Schertz-Cibolo- Universal City ISD could experience more than 900 new home closings by the end of 2024 The district has more than 440 homes currently in inventory with more than 1,900 additional lots available to build on Groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD is forecasted to enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections Ord. 25-S-027 Zone Change Request to Middle Density Residential (R-5) Samuel Haas| Senior Planner Approx. 19 Acres Guadalupe PID: 68302, 68303 19018 Old Wiederstein Existing: Residential 2 Background •The applicant is proposing to rezone to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) to be developed into multifamily style senior housing with a proposed density of 7.65 DU (dwelling units) per acre •R-5 accommodates up to 12 DU/ac for a development of this size. •The zoning district also allows for attached or detached residential dwelling units •Multifamily site design requirements in Article 9. •Ten percent (10%) of the total platted area as common, usable open space. 3 •May 23, 2025, a total of 19 Public Hearing Notices were sent out. •Responses Received: 4 – Opposition, 4-In Favor 0-Neutral •1 sign was posted on the property. 4 5 •Existing Zoning: Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (RA) •Proposed Zoning: Middle Density Residential District (R-5) Background 6 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 1.Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. •The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Mixed Use Center •Intended for a mix of residential, commercial and entertainment •Specific callout for multifamily residential. 7 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City The City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses. The immediate area consists of: •Single Family Subdivision •Multifamily Housing •Restaurants and Retail 8 9 Restaurant / Retail Multifamily Belmont Park UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 2. Continued. •A preliminary traffic analysis was conducted •The proposed increase in traffic would be considered negligible 10 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; •The immediate area being open space, rural residences, single-family subdivisions, and a large mixed-use development. •Proposed zone change has uses that align with what the current uses are in the vicinity. 11 Examples of Permitted Uses (UDC 21.5.8) Permitted by Right Specific Use Permit Accessory Building, Residential Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Multi-Family Apartment Dwelling Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Attached One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Two-Family Dwelling Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship New and Unlisted Uses UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment; •Schertz Fire,EMS,and Police have been notified of the zone change requests and have provided no objection. •SCUCISD has also been notified of the zone change request. •The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. 12 Recommendation Staff Recommendation •The proposed zone change aligns with the Comprehensive Land Plan •Is consistent with surrounding land uses. •Staff recommends approval of Ord. 25-S-027. •The City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2025 and made a recommendation of approval with a 6-1 vote. 13 Agenda No. 9.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 25-S-029 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 173 acres of land from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310012, 309425, 309427, generally located 1,000 feet to the west of Cibolo Creek on Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas) BACKGROUND Per the applicant's letter of intent, the applicant is proposing to rezone three separate tracts. The first is an approximately 95-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), the second is an approximately 51-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and the final tract is an approximately 27-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6). The purpose of this rezone is to develop a single family subdivision with a mixture of housing types and lot sizes.  The property is not platted and is currently undeveloped. On May 23, 2025, eight (8) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding properties within a 200-foot notification boundary of the subject property. At the time of the staff report, one (1) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. A public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express" on June 11, 2025. Additionally, one (1) sign was placed on the subject property.  Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) Undeveloped / Rural Residence Proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1, R-2, & R-6)Single-Family Subdivision Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Agricultural District (AD)Undeveloped South Right-of-Way Lower Seguin Road  East N/A - City Limits - Waterway,  Agricultural District (AD), and Single Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) Cibolo Creek & Rural Residence West Planned Development District (PDD)Single-Family Subdivision (Saddlebrook Ranch) GOAL Per the applicant's letter of intent, the applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 173 acres to develop a single-family subdivision with a mixture of housing types and lot sizes.     Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size and Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code District Area SqFt Width Ft Depth Ft Front Ft Side Ft Rear Ft Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Existing AD Agricultural 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% Existing R-A Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural 21,780 N/A N/A 25 25 25 2 35 50% Proposed R-1 Single-Family Residential 9,600 80 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% Proposed R-2 Single-Family Residential 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% Proposed R-6 Single-Family Residential 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Complete Neighborhood. The Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation is intended for a mix of residential lot sizes with neighborhood commercial to create a complete neighborhood. The proposed zone change to multiple Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) implements the policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan by providing a different lot sizes and a mix of residential properties. Specifically, the proposed rezone would create approximately 94.86 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-1), approximately 51.11 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-2), and approximately 26.78 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-6).  2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. As part of promoting health, safety, and general welfare, zone change requests should align with the Unified Development Code (UDC) and city policy. Among these policies is the explicit purpose to "minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings". There are several single-family subdivisions either in development or constructed along the Lower Seguin Road corridor, including:  Rhine Valley - 447 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 45 feet by 120 feet to 60 feet by 120 feet Carmel Ranch - 131 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 55 feet by 125 feet to 70 feet by 120 feet Saddlebrook Ranch - 633 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 50 feet by 100 feet to 70 feet by 118 feet Monterey Meadows - Ord. 24-S-148 - Approx. 174 lots, R-2 and R-6 zoning districts  The proposed rezoning is consistent with and similar to existing and currently in development residential subdivisions in the area.  Furthermore, one of the UDC's goals is to "lessen congestion in the streets and provide convenient, safe and efficient circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic". As part of this proposed zoning, the applicant submitted a preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) detailing the impact the proposed development will have on the transportation system in the immediate area. The City of Schertz Engineering Department reviewed this preliminary TIA and provided the following:  A preliminary traffic analysis has been done to evaluate the potential impact the adjacent streets by the proposed zone change.  The existing zoning allows for some residential development which would generate a maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips if the property were developed to the maximum density allowed.  A comparison was done comparing this maximum peak hour trip to the peak hour trips the property would generate based on the requested zoning.  The difference between these two peak values is significant.  If the proposed zoning is approved, the site could generate approximately 311 more peak hour vehicle trips.  This increase in the peak hour trips would require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) by the developer as the proposed project progresses through the City’s development process.  For this zone change application, the developer did a preliminary TIA to analyze the effects of this additional traffic to the adjacent streets.  This preliminary TIA shows that certain improvements to Lower Seguin Road will need to be provided to mitigate these additional peak hour vehicle trips.  Such improvements include: a right turn/deceleration lane and left turn lane at the entrance to the proposed development.  Further analysis will be required via a Final TIA for the development as it progresses through the development process, should the zone change request be approved.  The developer will be required to construct all mitigation measure identified in the Final TIA to mitigate the effects of the additional traffic being generated. In additional to any improvements identified in the TIA, the developer will also be responsible for some widening of Lower Seguin Road along the development’s frontage.  This widening, along with the widening done by the Saddlebrook development to the west and the widening that the Monterey Meadows proposed development is required to do on the south side of Lower Seguin Road across from this proposed development, will also add some additional traffic volume capacity to Lower Seguin Road in the vicinity of this proposed development. The Monterey Meadows development is further ahead of this development in the development process and is expected to be constructed slightly in advance of, or at the same time, as this development.  The Preliminary TIA analysis did not rely on any of these improvements in its analysis.  Instead it assumed a “worst case scenario” and analyzed the effects of the additional traffic with Lower Seguin Road remained in its current width.  The required street widening by the proposed developments will increase the positive effect of the mitigation improvements identified in the Preliminary TIA for this development. In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on the City’s transportation system, but that traffic increase can be successfully mitigated by street improvements the developer will be required to construct. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area The immediate area consists of undeveloped land, rural residences, and several single-family subdivisions currently being developed. The uses permitted in Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) are as follows:  UDC Section 21.5.8 Permitted Uses Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) Permitted by Right Permitted with SUP Accessory Building, Residential Family or Group Home Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Bed and Breakfast Inn Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship In-Home Day Care New and Unlisted Uses The uses allowed by right and by Specific Use Permit are consistent with the current immediate area and consistent with the trajectory of the Lower Seguin Corridor.  4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment All UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change. City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have been notified of the zone change and have provided no objections to the request. SCUC ISD has also been notified of the zone change request. The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. RECOMMENDATION Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, and the compatibility and consistency of potential land uses staff is Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, and the compatibility and consistency of potential land uses staff is recommending approval of Ord. 25-S-029. The City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2025, and made a recommendation of approval with a 7-0 vote. Attachments Ord. 25-S-029 with Exhibits  Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  PH Responses  Zoning Exhibit  SCUC ISD 10- Year Forecasting  SCUC ISD Demographic Report  City Council Presentation Slides  ORDINANCE 25-S-029 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 173 ACRES OF LAND FROM AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (AD) AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL / AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (R-A) TO SINGLE- FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-1), SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-2), AND SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-6), KNOWN AS BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 310012, 309425, 309427, GENERALLY LOCATED 1,000 FEET TO THE WEST OF CIBOLO CREEK ON LOWER SEGUIN ROAD, CITY OF SCHERTZ, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application for a request to rezone approximately 173 acres of land from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single- Family Residential District (R-1), Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310012, 309425, 309427, generally located 1,000 feet to the west of Cibolo Creek on Lower Seguin Road more specifically described in the Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached herein (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zoning (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on June 4, 2025, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested zoning; and WHEREAS, on July 1, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B, is hereby zoned to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), Single- Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as t o the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED and ADOPTED, this ____day of ________ 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheree Courney, Deputy City Secretary Exhibit “A” Metes & Bounds Exhibit “B” Zoning Exhibit PRE PRE PDD R-2 AD R-6 R-1 R-6 R-2 D E W R I D G E W A Y WEIR R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L LOWE R S E G U I N R D K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R W E I R R D PRAI R I E VALL E Y C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST SPUR HOL L O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY Q U A I L C R E S T RED A P P L E R D S A R R E B O U R G S T G A L I N E E R G L E N PI N E R I V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEAC H WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N BAY MARE L N DENI M STAK E D R C A R M E L VI E W HORS E B A C K PL B L U E B O N N E T P T WINDI N G BUTTE MULH O U S E D R LAGU N A CREST ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N RAF B U R N E T T E PRE PRE AD AD PDD R-A R-2 AD R-6 B L U E B O N N E T P T D E W R I D G E W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R WEIR R D C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST LOWE R S E G U I N R D SPUR HOL L O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY RED A P P L E R D Q U A I L C R E S T S A R R E B O U R G S T PI N E R I V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEAC H WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N PRAI R I E V A L L E Y BAY MARE L N DENI M STAK E D R C A R M E L VI E W HORS E B A C K PL WINDI N G BUTT E MULH O U S E D R LAGU N A CREST G A L I N E E R G L E N ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N WE I R R D RAF B U R N E T T E Last update: January 23rd, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* BEXAR COUNTY PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 CURRENT : Classification (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-5) Middle Density District (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) 0 800 1,600 2,400400 Feet PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSED :PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 PLZC20240315 T e x a s V l y R o t h a u D r Belfort Pt Er s tein Vly Cibo l o C r e e k R a f B u r n e t t e T e x a s V l y L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d M u l h o u s e D r A l s a t i a n W a y S a r r e b o u r g S t A r c h e s V ly C i b o lo C r e e k C i b o l o C r e e k C i b o l o C r e e k L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d Lo w e r S e g u i n R d W e i r R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U [Ú !P!P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P 60591 WOOD D A V I D & HALIM U Y A K W E T A L 60567 LAUBA C H G I L B E R T & FRA N C E S 60535 YOUNG DAVID A & LENORE M 69602 NOLTE R R O B E R T SCOT T & A L L I S O N G 60581 NOLTE R R O B E R T SCOT T & A L L I S O N G 309429 FERNANDEZ ROSENDO ZAMBRANO 309421 YOUNG DAVID A & LENORE M 309419 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 10008 1 5 4 310011 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 310022 FRIESENHAHN MILTON & BILLIE, BASHA ELIZABETH ANN, ZWIEKE 1367371 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 10008 1 4 6 10008 1 4 5 10008 1 4 2 10008 1 4 0 10008 1 3 7 10008 1 3 2 10008 1 2 9 10008 1 2 7 10008 1 5 5 A S H T O N S A N A N T O N I O R E S I D E N T I A L L L C 8 " W L 1 6 " W L 2 " W L 8" W L 1 8 " W L 8" WL 4 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 30" W L 8 " W L 6 " W L 12" W L 8 " W L 8" W L 8" WL 8" W L 18" WL 8" W L 4 " W L 8"WL 8 " W L 16 " W L 2" W L 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6"HD P E 6"HD P E 6"H D P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 8"PVC SDR 26 D-2241 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C SD R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 26 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 D - 2 2 4 1 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C SD R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 1 0 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8"PV C S D R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 S C H A E F E R R D A L S A T I A N W A Y S O R R E L R I V E RMULHOUSEDR L O W E R S E G U I N R D ROTHAU DR D E W R I D G E W A Y WE I R R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L H O M B O U R G R D BARR WAY A R C H E S V A L L E Y OLD CHUT E RD S A R R E B O U R G S T BUSSANGRD P I N E R I V E R D R M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N SPU R H O L L O W PALO M I N O SPU R R E D A P P L E R D PRA I R I E V A L L E Y S U N N Y V E R A N D A R D LOW E R P E A C H W A Y HILL P L A I N S DR ST LO U I S WAY GUNS B A C H WAY P E P P E R C O R N P L MOLSHEIM R D WIND I N G PEA R L N B A Y M A R E L N R E D B U D C A N Y O N B E L F ORT P T B L U E B O N N E T P T LOW E R V A L L E Y L N G A L I N E E R G L E N B A R T E N H E I M D R T E X A S V A L L E Y P V T R D A T 1 4 4 2 H A E C K E R V I L L E R D RAF B U R N E T T E G u a d a l u p e C o u n t y B e x a r C o u n t y Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Maxar 0 600 1,200 1,800300 Feet Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Residential Collector Planned Residential Collector Planned Commercial Collector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" Unknown Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes [Ú CCMA Lift Station [Ú Private Lift Station [Ú Schertz Lift Station 3Q CCMA Treatment Plant 3Q Schertz Treatment Plant County Boundaries Schertz Municipal Boundary ETJ Last update: January 23rd, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* City of Schertz PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 : CONC O R D I A L N (605 9 1 ) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (605 6 7 ) HAECKERVILLE RD (60535) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (696 0 2 ) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (605 8 1 ) 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 0 9 4 2 9 ) 1282 6 RAF B U R N E T T E (309 4 2 1 ) 1257 2 RAF B U R N E T T E (309 4 1 9 ) 1014 8 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 3 2 ) 1014 4 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 5 5 ) 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 1 0 0 1 1 ) 1284 0 LOW E R S E G U I N R D (310 0 2 2 ) LOW E R S E G U I N R D (136 7 3 7 1 ) 1017 2 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 5 4 ) 1016 8 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 6 ) 1016 4 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 5 ) 1016 0 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 2 ) 1015 6 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 0 ) 1015 2 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 3 7 ) 1013 6 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 7 ) 1014 0 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 9 ) LUNEVIL L E LN S C H A E F E R R D P A S E O P O S T P L A L S A T I A N W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E H O M B O U R G R D ROTHAU DR S O R R E L R I V E R M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N BE L F O R T P T BU S S A N G R D A R C H E S V A L L E Y SPUR HOL L O W L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D RED APPLE R D HILL PLAIN S D R P I N E R I V E R D R GUNS B A C H WAY LOWE R PEAC H W A Y MOLSHEIM RD LOWE R V A L L E Y L N PRAI R I E V A L L E Y B L U E B O N N E T P T MULH O U S E D R G A L I N E E R G L E N P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D B A R T E N H E I M D R R E D B U D C A N Y O N WE I R R D T E X A S V A L L E Y PVT R D A T 1 4 4 2 HAECK E R V I L L E R D RAF B U R N E T T E 0 900 1,800 2,700450 Feet Project Boundary City Limits Schertz ETJ Boundary 200' Buffer PRE PRE PDD R-2 AD R-6 R-1 R-6 R-2 D E W R I D G E W A Y WEIR R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L LOWE R S E G U I N R D K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R W E I R R D PRAI R I E VALL E Y C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST SPUR HOL L O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY Q U A I L C R E S T RED A P P L E R D S A R R E B O U R G S T G A L I N E E R G L E N PI N E R I V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEAC H WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N BAY MARE L N DENI M STAK E D R C A R M E L VI E W HORS E B A C K PL B L U E B O N N E T P T WINDI N G BUTTE MULH O U S E D R LAGU N A CREST ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N RAF B U R N E T T E PRE PRE AD AD PDD R-A R-2 AD R-6 B L U E B O N N E T P T D E W R I D G E W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R WEIR R D C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST LOWE R S E G U I N R D SPUR HOL L O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY RED A P P L E R D Q U A I L C R E S T S A R R E B O U R G S T PI N E R I V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEAC H WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N PRAI R I E V A L L E Y BAY MARE L N DENI M STAK E D R C A R M E L VI E W HORS E B A C K PL WINDI N G BUTT E MULH O U S E D R LAGU N A CREST G A L I N E E R G L E N ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N WE I R R D RAF B U R N E T T E Last update: January 23rd, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* BEXAR COUNTY PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 CURRENT : Classification (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-5) Middle Density District (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) 0 800 1,600 2,400400 Feet PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSED FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (C URRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 3Q24 Demographic Report 2 Annual Enrollment Change *Yellow Box = largest grade per year Green Box = second largest grade per year Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2024/25 384 747 849 866 1,006 1,043 1,108 1,118 1,126 1,198 1,413 1,427 1,354 1,225 14,864 Difference 60 -10 -35 29 -17 -25 13 -2 -14 34 56 -24 40 -23 82 18.5%-1.1%-3.4%2.8%-1.6%-2.2%1.1%-0.2%-1.1%2.8%4.3%-1.7%3.1%-1.8%0.5% 3-year avg.0.992 0.924 1.028 1.025 1.026 1.023 0.984 1.023 1.020 1.029 1.127 0.975 0.928 0.995 1.005 1.004 1.025 1.006 Cohorts PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Elem Int Mid High 2021/22 1.400 0.983 1.048 1.000 1.033 1.036 0.990 1.068 1.045 1.056 1.171 1.042 0.936 0.969 1.020 1.029 1.050 1.029 2022/23 0.958 0.876 1.029 1.001 1.057 1.037 0.956 1.008 1.007 1.015 1.121 0.960 0.926 0.983 1.000 0.982 1.011 0.998 2023/24 0.986 0.962 1.023 1.005 0.999 1.012 0.969 1.028 1.040 1.028 1.099 0.987 0.903 1.031 1.000 0.998 1.034 1.005 2024/25 1.033 0.935 1.033 1.068 1.023 1.021 1.028 1.034 1.014 1.046 1.162 0.978 0.955 0.971 1.016 1.031 1.030 1.017 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Oct-24 Oct-23 3 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.9 3.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p - 1 9 No v - 1 9 Ja n - 2 0 Ma r - 2 0 Ma y - 2 0 Ju l - 2 0 Se p - 2 0 No v - 2 0 Ja n - 2 1 Ma r - 2 1 Ma y - 2 1 Ju l - 2 1 Se p - 2 1 No v - 2 1 Ja n - 2 2 Ma r - 2 2 Ma y - 2 2 Ju l - 2 2 Se p - 2 2 No v - 2 2 Ja n - 2 3 Ma r - 2 3 Ma y - 2 3 Ju l - 2 3 Se p - 2 3 No v - 2 3 Ja n - 2 4 Ma r - 2 4 Ma y - 2 4 Ju l - 2 4 Se p - 2 4 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Oct 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 17,441 17,992 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q3 2015Q3 2016Q3 2017Q3 2018Q3 2019Q3 2020Q3 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings San Antonio New Home Closings Source: Zonda Key Trends Starts: +29% YOY / +1% QOQ Closings: -5% YOY / -4% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 551 Homes 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –3Q24 * Based on additional research by Zonda Education ** Totals DO NOT include age-restricted communities Rank District Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,637 3,710 1,999 6,305 21,310 2 COMAL ISD 2,442 2,704 1,776 4,918 24,373 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,202 2,382 1,217 4,596 31,031 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,222 2,055 1,254 4,560 24,573 5 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,333 1,203 739 2,317 7,002 6 JUDSON ISD 679 941 308 508 969 7 SCHERTZ CIBOLO ISD*770 831 442 1,939 6,169 8 NAVARRO ISD 834 810 482 1,253 6,877 9 BOERNE ISD 784 768 555 1,264 9,651 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 706 731 298 964 16,713 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 610 618 388 767 6,366 12 NORTH EAST ISD 347 342 220 899 5,316 13 SEGUIN ISD 318 321 250 588 5,519 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 247 222 162 160 720 15 MARION ISD 194 166 111 264 4,352 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 127 139 54 205 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 70 100 138 327 688 18 LYTLE ISD 88 73 50 334 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 49 64 25 83 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 4 39 23 16 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings by Quarter Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 612 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 684 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 85 19 110 27 29 52 275 238 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 4 0 1 0 1 3 41 242 ROSE GARDEN 205 57 226 38 86 126 680 2,722 SCHERTZ 0 0 23 2 0 1 0 60 SIPPEL 288 63 227 64 89 151 637 1,556 WATTS 53 7 93 26 14 28 23 580 WIEDERSTEIN 135 17 151 43 28 81 283 771 Grand Total 770 163 831 200 247 442 1,939 6,169 •The district has 24 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions •265 lots were delivered in the 3rd quarter 9 District Housing Overview Residential Activity 10 Grace Valley •868 total lots •574 future lots •159 vacant developed lots •31 homes under construction •97 occupied homes •Started 115 homes in last 12 months, started 28 homes in 3Q24 •Streets being paved for 162 lots in Phase 2 •Lennar •$237K+ •Current Student Yield = .20 Nov 2024 Nov 2024Residential Activity 11 Carmel Ranch •127 total lots •120 vacant developed lots •7 homes under construction •All lots delivered for homebuilding 3Q24 •Anticipate first homes Spring 2025 •Meritage Homes •$402K+ Saddlebrook Ranch •635 total lots •467 future lots •164 vacant developed lots •4 homes under construction •First homes started 3Q24 •Groundwork underway on 132 lots in Phase 4 & 6 •Ashton Woods Homes •$360K+ Residential Activity 12 Clearwater Creek •1,156 total future lots •Initial groundwork underway on 104 lots in Phase 1 •Lennar Nov 2024 13 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family Market-September 2024 14 District Multifamily Overview •There are more than 600 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes •There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district Residential Activity 15 Schertz Station •318 single-family rental homes under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 Residential Activity 16 Aviator 1518 •300 apartment units under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 •There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district •The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 17 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 18 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 19 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12)827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13)862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14)937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15)985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16)989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17)995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18)1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19)982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20)1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21)951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22)935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23)819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24)788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25)739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26)699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27)763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28)750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29)776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD KG Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 20 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 -107 -0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 -221 -1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 -209 -1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 -172 -1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 -197 -1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 -63 -0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 -89 -0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 -165 -1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 -41 -0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 -5 0.0% 21 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change -4.17%-3.35%-1.80%-1.18%0.72%1.06%2.22%1.44%1.75%1.72%1.91% Elementary Absolute Change -213 -164 -85 -55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%-0.40%-3.73%-2.61%-4.69%-5.02%-3.97%2.48%2.85%0.47%2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 -9 -83 -56 -98 -100 -75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change -4.01%-2.01%4.31%-0.96%-3.96%-2.68%-4.73%-4.73%-4.02%2.43%2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change -98 -47 99 -23 -94 -61 -105 -100 -81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92%2.07%-2.72%-1.38%-0.24%-1.59%0.25%-1.95%-4.30%-3.68%-4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 -152 -75 -13 -85 13 -103 -222 -182 -203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change -1.32%-0.72%-1.49%-1.43%-1.19%-1.38%-0.45%-0.64%-1.19%-0.30%-0.04% District Absolute Change -200 -107 -221 -209 -172 -197 -63 -89 -165 -41 -5 22 Key Takeaways If the current trend continues, Schertz-Cibolo- Universal City ISD could experience more than 900 new home closings by the end of 2024 The district has more than 440 homes currently in inventory with more than 1,900 additional lots available to build on Groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD is forecasted to enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections Ord. 25-S-029 Zone Change from Agricultural District and Single Family Residential / Agricultural (RA) to Single Family Residential (R-1, R-2, R-6). Samuel Haas | Senior Planner Approx. 173 Acres Bexar PID: 31002, 309425, 309427 Existing: Rural Residence, and Undeveloped 2 Background •Applicant is proposing to rezone three separate tracts •95-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1) •51-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2) •27-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (RA)to Single-Family Residential District (R-6) •The purpose of this rezone is to develop a single-family subdivision with a mixture of housing types and lot sizes. 3 •May 23, 2025, a total of 8 Public Hearing Notices were sent out. •Responses Received: 0 – Opposition, 1-In Favor 0-Neutral •1 sign was posted on the property. 4 5 •Existing Zoning: Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (RA) •Proposed Zoning: Single-Family Residential District (R-1, R-2, & R-6) Background 6 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 1.Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. •The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Complete Neighborhood •Intended for a mix of residential lot sizes with neighborhood commercial •Multiple Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R- 6)provides different lot sizes and a mix of residential properties. 7 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City The City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses. There are several single-family subdivisions either in development or constructed along the Lower Seguin Road corridor: •Rhine Valley - 447 lots •Carmel Ranch - 131 lots •Saddlebrook Ranch - 633 lots •Monterey Meadows - Ord.24-S-148 - Approx. 174 lots The proposed zoning would help minimize conflicts as it is similar to other developments on the Lower Seguin Corridor. 8 9 Proposed Saddlebrook Ranch •Rhine Valley - 447 lots •Carmel Ranch - 131 lots •Saddlebrook Ranch - 633 lots •Monterey Meadows - Ord.24-S-148 - Approx. 174 lots •Ord.25-S-022 – R-2 (20 acres)Rhine Valley Monterey Meadows Carmel Ranch Ord. 25-S-022 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 2. Continued. •A preliminary traffic analysis was conducted •It will increase traffic on the City’s transportation system • but the traffic can be successfully mitigated by street improvements the developer will be required to construct 10 UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; •The immediate area being undeveloped land, rural residences, and several single-family subdivisions currently in development •Proposed zone change has uses that align with what the current uses are in the vicinity. 11 Examples of Permitted Uses (UDC 21.5.8) Permitted by Right Specific Use Permit Accessory Building, Residential Family or Group Home Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Bed and Breakfast Inn Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship In-Home Day Care New and Unlisted Uses UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment; •Schertz Fire,EMS,and Police have been notified of the zone change requests and have provided no objection. •SCUCISD has also been notified of the zone change request. •The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. 12 Recommendation Staff Recommendation •The proposed zone change aligns with the Comprehensive Land Plan •Is consistent with surrounding land uses. •Staff recommends approval of Ord. 25-S-029 •The City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on June 4, 2025, and made a recommendation of approval with a 7-0 vote. 13 Agenda No. 10.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject:Monthly Update - Major Projects in Progress/CIP (B.James/K.Woodlee) Attachments 7-1-25 Council Update on In Progress Projects  Informational Only CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: July 1, 2025 Department: City Manager Subject: Update on Major Projects in Progress Background This is the monthly update on large projects that are in progress or in the planning process. This update is being provided so Council will be up to date on the progress of these large projects. If Council desires more information on any project or on projects not on this list, please reach out to staff and that information will be provided. Facilities Projects: 1. Fleet Building Parking Lot Project Description – Pave the open grassy area located at 27 Commercial Place o Project Status: Site Plan Development and Construction Design o Projected Completion: To be determined o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: To be determined Project Update: This project is being pushed back to FY 25-26 or FY26-27 as we need to reallocate funding from this project to help fund the repairs of the retention wall and pavers at the Schertz Library. 2. Library Retention Wall (Pavers) Project Description – Replacing the failing plastic panels around the library foundation with concrete panels. This includes removal and replacement of some of the concrete pavers in the rear courtyard. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: $350,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineering o Contractor: To be determined Project Update: Staff is reviewing the construction plans and evaluating replacing the pavers with decorative concrete instead of new pavers. 3. Fire Station 4 Project Description – Fire Station 4 Design and Build o Project Status: Site Plan Development and Construction Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: Estimated $13.25 million o Consultant: AGCM – Owner Rep & Martinez Architecture o Contractor: Marksman - CMAR Project Update: The project is going well. We are at 50% plans and quickly approaching 75%. At that point, we will get pricing to ensure we are at a good point before moving forward as pricing is very dynamic over the past 6 months. 4. FM 78 Build Out PD CID Property Room Project Description – Remodel a portion of the County Building that PD will utilize for CID and Property o Project Status: Pending approval from County o Projected Completion: TBD o Consultant: TBD o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Currently awaiting approval from the County as to when the Police Department can move into the designated space in the County building located off FM 78. 5. Police Department building remodel Project Description – Remodel office areas within building 06 where the Police Department operates. o Project Status: Pending approval from the County that PD can move into the County building o Projected Completion: TBD o Consultant: TBD o Contractor: TBD Project Update: This project is in conjunction with the Police Department moving into the County building on FM 78. Once moved, remodeling of the specific areas within the Police Department will begin. Drainage Projects: 1. FM 78 South Channel Silt Removal Project Description – Silt removal for the existing FM 78 South Drainage channel to include permitting, easement acquisition and construction. o Project Status: Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: Design $32,100, Drainage Report $4,600 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: No new updates since last council meeting. Design of the project is complete. The project has been on hold pending resolution of some easement acquisition challenges. Staff are working to identify the appropriate path of access to the channel. Unintech will resume work to acquire necessary easements for the project once those challenges have been resolved. After easements are acquired, the project will be rebid, and construction will proceed. Water and Wastewater Projects: 1. Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Interceptor Main and Lift Station Project Description – Design and construction of a sanitary sewer system to collect and convey wastewater to the future CCMA water reclamation plant off Trainer Hale Road in Southern Schertz. The system consists of approximately 19,000 linear feet of 30” gravity wastewater line running generally along Woman Hollering Creek from the existing Sedona lift station on FM 1518 to a new lift station on IH 10 and approximately 6,000 feet of force main from the lift station to CCMA plant. It also includes an additional 18” gravity line approximately 1,500 feet in length that will first serve the Hallie’s Cove Subdivision. The system is necessary for the new CCMA plant to begin operation and to allow the existing Woman Hollering Lift Station at Sedona to be taken out of service. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: Engineering/Design $1,187,594, Land purchases, ROW, legal and advertising $700,810, Construction $11,100,000, totaling $12,988,404 o Design Engineer: Cobb Fendley & Associates, Inc. o Owner’s Representative: AGCM, Inc. o Contractor: Thalle Construction Co, Inc. Project Update: No change since the last update. The collection and conveyance system including the lift station was put into operation March 3, 2025. The CCMA South Plant is operational. The Woman Hollering Package Treatment Plant has been shut down and is being cleaned and removed from the leased property location. The Sedona Lift Station and the pump and haul operation at Hallie’s Cove are being decommissioned. Staff are continuing to work on generating punch lists for the project to be completed. It is estimated that the remainder of the work on the project will take several months to complete. 2. Riata Lift Station Relocation Project Description – Relocation of the Riata Lift Station ahead of TxDOT’s IH 35 NEX project to remove it from conflict with the proposed highway improvements. The design phase included identification of a new site for the list station, design of new lift station and design of the abandonment of the existing lift station. Property and easement acquisitions were required. The new lift station is needed to maintain sewer services. o Project Status: Begin Construction 4th Quarter of 2024. o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Acquisition of easements and existing lift station $478,000; Construction: $2,545,375 o Consultant: Utility Engineering Group, PLLC o Contractor: Keystone Construction o Project Update: Keystone continues construction of the lift station. The wet well structure has been set and hydrostatic tested. The contractor continues with the site work. Electrical equipment and generators have long lead times, but all have been ordered. Staff is working with the contractor to schedule utility work in Fairlawn Avenue that will impact traffic. The plan is to have that work completed while schools are closed. 3. FM 1518 Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT FM 1518 Improvement Project. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: The City’s utility relocation portion of the project is expected to be completed in the summer of 2025. o Project Cost: Design NTE $980,000, Construction Joint Bid $8,986,837/Aztec 16” Line $884,270 o Consultant: Halff Associates o Contractor: SER Construction Partners (TxDOT’s General Contractor)/Qro Mex Construction (Aztec 16” Line) Project Update: SER continues the installation of water and sewer as part of the joint bid work. The new water lines have all been tested and placed into service from Schaefer Rd down to IH 10. Terracon has been scheduled to perform load testing on old, abandoned AC water lines to determine whether they can remain abandoned in place or if they will need to be removed. Capital Excavation has installed the sewer from Founder School down to the Sedona lift station. Final testing still remains before the new sewer line is fully operational and abandonment of the old line begins. Final close out documents are being assembled to complete the construction contract with Qro Mex. 4. Corbett Ground Storage Tank Project Description – Construction of a new 3-million-gallon Ground Storage Tank (GST). The GST will be used to fill the existing Corbett Elevated Storage Tank and provide additional water storage capacity. This new GST will receive water directly from the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation. o Project Status: Construction Phase o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: Design $466,265, Construction $7,360,054 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers o Contractor: Pesado Construction Co. Project Update: No new updates. Pesado has completed the generator, electrical building, and pump pads and continues with yard piping and other site work. Pesado indicated that the electrical switchboard delivery has been moved up 2 months to August 2025. The planned schedule is to complete construction near the end of September. 5. Water Loop Lines Project Description – Install 12” water main lines to provide a looped distribution system from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin and Pfeil Road to N Graytown Road. o Project Status: Design/Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: Design NTE $200,000, Construction Estimate $4,400,000 Project Update: The easement acquisition continues. We are waiting on a counteroffer from one (1) property owner that is working to secure their own appraisal. Another property is in probate. Staff is considering asking council to approve moving forward with eminent domain due to lack of response and overall timeline to acquire these easements. 6. IH 35 NEX-North Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT IH 35 NEX project. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Joint Bid Construction is planned for End of 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Easement Acquisition Services - $1,250,000 o Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: Halff is working to secure the last easement necessary for the sewer portion of the project. The last property owner has provided a counteroffer over our appraised values. This offer has been sent to TXDOT for review since this project is reimbursable. TXDOT has informed us that reimbursement is based on fair market value. We are making one (1) last offer to the owner and if rejected, staff will ask council to approve proceeding with eminent domain. Extent of IH 35 NEX – Northern Segment 7. Robin Hood Way Waterline Replacement Project Description – Replacement and upsizing of water line in Robin Hood Way, Sherlock Lane, and Nottingshire. The main replacement is to increase flows in the area, particularly to meet fire flow requirements. The project also includes street resurfacing and rehabilitation work that was previously removed from the SPAM project. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: $5,350,000 o Consultant: Kimley- Horn & Associates Project Update: No change from last month. Staff are reviewing the preliminary plans for the project. 8. Bell North Sewer Extension Project Description – Ten commercial properties on the west end of Bell North Drive are served by private grinder pumps that pump into a public wastewater force main that discharges into a manhole near 17316 Bell North Drive. This project is the construction of a gravity sewer main within Bell North Drive that will flow toward and discharge into the main on Doerr Lane. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: o Project Cost: Design $95,000 o Consultant: Freeland Turk Engineering Group LLC Project Update: Freeland Turk has provided a 50% set of plans for review. Staff is meeting with the consultant to discuss the design and ways to proceed with the abandonment of the onsite grinder lift stations. 9. Northcliffe Country Club Estates Water and Wastewater Main Replacement Project Description – replacement of the water and wastewater mains and rehabilitation of the streets in the Northcliffe Country Club Estates subdivision. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Easement Acquisition Services - $5,000,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc Project Update: Project design is underway. Locate marks have been completed in the neighborhood for the survey data collection and surveying has begun. 10. Cibolo West Wastewater Trunk Main Project Description – Installation of approximately 21,680 LF of gravity wastewater trunk main that will collect wastewater at the location of the Saddlebrook Wastewater Lift Station as well as areas north of Schaefer Road and convey flows south along a route including along Weir and Trainer Hale Roads and the west side of Cibolo Creek to the CCMA South Water Reclamation Plant. Having this line in place will ultimately allow the decommissioning of the Corbett and Saddlebrook Lift Stations. The project is a collaboration between the City of Schertz and Green Valley Special Utility District (GVSUD). o Project Status: Route Study o Projected Completion: Study expected to be complete Summer 2025 o Total Project Cost: $16,213,000 o Consultant for Study: Lockwood, Andrews, & Newnam, Inc. Project Update: The route study and sizing of the trunk main is underway. Staff from the City and from GVSUD meet with the consultant biweekly to review progress. The proposed alignment is being fine-tuned in some locations, and the wastewater model is being used to determine line size needs. Easement needs are being identified, and preliminary cost estimates are being prepared and reviewed. Street Projects: 1. Main Street Improvements Project Project Description – The project will improve sidewalks, provide street lighting, way-finding signage, landscaping, utility relocations, and architectural elements such as decorative concrete, decorative lighting, screening, and area signage. This project will also replace aging water and sanitary sewer mains and reconstruct the street with a new, stronger pavement section. Additionally, Lindbergh between Main and Exchange will be reconstructed. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design NTE $2,173,905, Construction $24,600,000 o Consultant: Kimley- Horn Associates Project Update: No changes from last month. The consultant is finetuning the water and sewer line replacement plans to address some conflicts with AT&T’s existing duct bank. The duct bank depth is not as deep in some places as expected and the alignment meanders in some sections. Options are being explored to address the conflicts as quickly and least costly as possible. The water and sewer replacement are expected to get started towards the end of Summer. 2. Lookout Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project involves reconstruction of Lookout Road from Schertz Parkway to Doerr Lane. A traffic signal at the Lookout Road/Schertz Parkway intersection will also be installed. The project also includes the replacement and upsizing the existing sanitary sewer main in Lookout Road from Doerr Lane to Schertz Parkway. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: March 2026 o Project Cost: Design $571,000 ($20,000 from Selma), Construction estimate $6,738,092 ($100,000 from Selma) o Design Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: No changes from last month. Right-of-Way acquisition at the Schertz Parkway and Doerr Lane intersections is underway. Our consultant is coordinating with the utility companies to get the known conflicts addressed. There are some last-minute sewer line changes being incorporated into the project plans to up-size part of the new sewer line to a 24” diameter. Staff will be working with EDC to start detailed public outreach to businesses in the near future. 3. Lower Seguin Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project will reconstruct a 2.9-mile segment of Lower Seguin Road to widen and improve the street to the section identified in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The City intends to pursue Federal DCIP funding for project construction. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: January 2027 o Project Cost: $18,200,000 o Consultant: Halff & Associates Project Update: Plans are almost fully completed and the application for DCIP funding has been submitted. The DCIP funding application and selection process has been changed. The application deadline was extended to July 3rd, and the selection process is now a two-step process. The initial applications received by July 3rd will be scored and ranked. Those projects ranked high enough will be notified in August that their application will be considered a formal application and the project will proceed through another round of discussions/evaluations. The second round of the selection project will have some direct discussions with the applicants. The final selection is expected to be completed in September and the funding awarded. 4. 2024 SPAM Resurfacing Project Description – The project includes the performance of prep work (base repairs, crack sealing, level up, etc.) and application of a slurry seal to the surface of various streets in the City. Work on other streets includes removal of existing asphalt surface; cement stabilization of base material; and application of a new layer of asphalt on street surface for other various City streets. PCI data was used to select the streets in the project. o Project Status: Warranty o Projected Completion: May 9, 2025 o Project Cost: $2,009,978 o Design Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates o Contractor: R.L. Jones LP Project Update: No change from last month. The project is fully complete. 5. Buffalo Valley South Resurfacing and Rehabilitation and Utility Replacements Project Description – Water and sanitary sewer main replacements and street rehabilitation of Buffalo Valley South, specifically Mill Street, 1st St, 2nd St, Bowman St, Lee St, Church St, Zuehl St, and Wuest. PCI data was used to select the streets in the project. Project will be funded with a combination of SPAM funding (for the street rehabilitation) and ARP funding for the utility replacement. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Winter 2026 o Project Cost: $5,705,000 (estimated total) o Design Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineering o Contractor: E-Z Bel Construction, LLC Project Update: The new water main in Zuehl has been installed. Part of the new water main on Mill Street has also been installed. The new sewer main has been installed on Church Street between 1st street and the west end. CenterPoint Energy has removed the gas line conflict with the western manhole on Church Street and the manhole has been installed. The new sewer main on Church Street has been pressure tested and passed. The homes on Zuehl are in the process of being connected to the new sewer main which will allow the existing sewer main to be abandoned. In about a month, the contractor expects to have the new water line on Zuehl, supplying water to the residences on the street and be working on the street rehabilitation. The contractor is installing the new sewer main on 1st Street between Church Street and FM. Part of this main is deeper than the rest of the sewer main – about 12-feet deep (see picture below). Also shown below is a picture of the new water main being installed in Mill Street. 6. Boenig Drive Reconstruction Project Description – Reconstruction of Boenig Drive between Ware Seguin Road and Graytown Road. The reconstruction includes reconfiguration of the intersection with Ware Seguin Road to improve efficiencies and eliminate having two street intersections side-by side on Ware Seguin Road. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Winter 2025 o Project Cost: $3,240,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project Update: No change from last month. The preliminary plan review has been completed and comments provided to our consultant. The consultant is working on final plans now. 7. 2024 SPAM Rehabilitation Project Description – Rehabilitation of St. Andrews, Maple, and part of the Silvertree Subdivision streets. Rehabilitation involves removing the existing pavement, applying cement stabilizing to the material underneath, and placing a new layer of pavement on the street. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Winter 2025 o Project Cost: $3,561,660 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates o Contractor: E-Z Bel Construction, LLC Project Update: Construction is expected to start early August 2025. 8. FM 3009 Overpass Project Description – TXDOT project for overpass construction at the FM 3009/FM 78 intersection to elevate the main lanes of FM 3009 over the railroad tracks and FM 78. On and off ramps will be provided so vehicles can travel between FM 3009 and FM 78 at the intersection. The project includes some improvements to FM 78 to improve operational efficiencies of the on and off ramps. o Project Status: Schematic Design and Environmental Clearance o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: $40,000,000 (TXDOT) o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: No change from last month. The schematic plans and the environmental clearance are still underway. TXDOT has formally applied to the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) for construction funding. While TXDOT has applied for funding, this doesn’t mean the funding will be available and construction starting soon. By applying for funding now, it gets the project “on the list” for AAMPO to consider and does not mean construction will occur soon. While funding is being considered by AAMPO, the environmental clearance and design efforts will continue, and more public meetings will be held to help refine the project design. Parks & Recreation Projects: 1. Schertz Soccer Complex Irrigation Water Storage Project Project Description – Upgrading electrical components, upsizing well pump and piping, and adding storage capacity for irrigation of the Schertz Soccer Complex. o Project Status: Pending Construction Schedule o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: $200,000 (estimated total) o Consultant: Unintech Engineering o Contractor: Kutscher Drilling Project Update: One bid was received (Kutscher Drilling) for the new well that is needed to be compliant with Edwards Aquifer Authority standards and council approved the contract on May 6. Construction is still pending the vendor’s scheduling, likely July 2025. Once the new well is drilled, the final phase is adding the additional storage tanks which city staff will facilitate. I.T. Projects: 1. Asset Management- Work Order System – Open Gov Project Description- Replace the current work order and asset management systems o Project Status: In progress o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: Approximately $470,000 o Contractor: Open Gov Project Update: City staff continues to work with the vendor through zoom training sessions and have separate department workshops to practice utilizing the software program in preparation for the planned rollout in July. Studies and Plans: 1. Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Update Staff has reviewed a scope and fee proposal from a consultant to begin work on an update to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Program. It is planned that this project will be brought to Council for authorization on July 15, 2025. 2. Regional Flood Planning Though not a formal, funded study, Staff is working with Regions 11 and 12 Flood Planning Groups to identify flooding issues throughout the City and flood management strategies to address them. TxDOT Roadway Projects: Note: If links do not work, please contact engineering@schertz.com 1. FM 1103 Improvement Project: Construction officially began in November 2022 and was originally expected to be complete in fall 2026. Minor progress is being made on the roadway while utility relocation continues. General project updates are available by signing up at this link: FM 1103 Construction Newsletter 2. FM 1518 Improvement Project: SER Construction, LLC, formally began construction on April 9, 2024. The contractor has leased property owned by the City on Schaefer Road to stage construction activities. The first few months of the project will be mainly underground utility construction and will mostly take place outside travel lanes. While there may be some delays, major traffic disruptions should not be experienced much during this phase of the project. The project is currently anticipated to be completed in 2028. Updates regarding the FM 1518 project are available by visiting and subscribing at the following link: FM 1518 Expansion 3. IH-35 NEX (I-410 South to FM 1103): The central segment of the I-35 Northeast Expansion project continues with Alamo NEX Construction handling the design-build project. The central section runs from 410 N to FM 3009. Utility coordination work for the northern segment of the project is underway. TxDOT consultants have met with Public Works and Engineering Staff to begin establishing relocation needs. The City will be reimbursed for the costs of all relocations needed except for any upsizing or improvements above current conditions. Updates about the project can be obtained by signing up at the following link: I 35 NEX Project Updates 4. IH-10 Graytown Road to Guadalupe County Line: Work for the widening of the main lanes and utility relocations continues. Work on the FM 1518 bridge over IH 10 continues and will involve numerous episodes of the rerouting of traffic including shifting lanes and detours as necessary. Updates regarding the IH 10 project are available by signing up at the following link: IH 10 Expansion Information Agenda No. 11.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:July 01, 2025 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject:Quarterly Update-City Council Approved Zoning and Specific Use Permit Ordinances in relation to current development status (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado) BACKGROUND The quarterly report identifies the zoning ordinances and specific use permit ordinances that have been heard and approved by City Council from 2023 to current. The report provides the ordinance approval date, a description of the request, location of the project, and the current development status. The current development status will provide information on whether the project is moving forward and is in the platting or site plan process or if no applications have been submitted in conjunction with that specific ordinance.  Attachments City Council Approved Ordinances- Current Status 07.2025  City Council Approved Ordinances- Current Status 07.2025- Page 1 City Council Approved Ordinances- Current Status 07.2025- Page 2