Loading...
06-02-2026 Agenda PacketMEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL June 2, 2026                                 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team  AGENDA TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 2026 at 6:00 p.m.        Call to Order   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Westbrook)   Proclamations   National Automotive Service Professionals Month-June 2026   Employee Introductions   EMS: Linda Castleman Donlea-Adminstrative Assistant Facility Services: Fernando Ortiz-Facilities Maintenance Technician Parks and Recreation:Grace Paliszewski-Events Attendant   Presentations   Presentation of the 2026 Hal Baldwin Scholarship Recipient (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez)    City Events and Announcements  June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 1  City Events and Announcements  Announcements of upcoming City Events (B.James/S.Gonzalez) Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S.Williams) Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R.Rodriguez)   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes-Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on May 5, 2026 and Council Meeting on May 12, 2026 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney/I.Chavez)   2.City of Schertz Boards, Committees, and Commissions  Appointments Reappointments  Library Advisory Board for the term ending June 30, 2028: Beverly O Clarke   Resignations, Removals, and Expiring Terms   3.Resolution 26-R-070- Authorizing a RCE funding application and Execution of Interlocal Agreements with Universal City and Cibolo for the Railroad Crossings Improvements Planning Study (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak) June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 2    4.Resolution 26-R-069 - Authorizing a Roadway Capital Recovery Offset and Reimbursement Agreement for Schertz Station Development (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak)    5.Resolution 26-R-074 - Authorizing an amendment to the billboard lease agreement with Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC (S.Williams/B.James)    6.Resolution 26-R-067 - Authorizing the City Manager to reject all proposal submissions received for the FM 78 Police Station Remodel Project (J.Lowery/D.Roman)   Discussion and Action Items   7.Resolution 26-R-072 - Authorizing a Notice of Intention to Issue Bonds (S. Gonzalez/J.Walters)    8.Resolution 26-R-073 - Establish the City's intention to reimburse itself for prior expenditures on improvements from upcoming tax-exempt obligations. (S.Gonzalez/J.Walters)    Public Hearings   9.Ordinance 26-S-010 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB), generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez)    10.Ordinance 26-S-011 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.1 acres of land, generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez)    11.Ordinance 26-S-012- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 0.2 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 502 Main Street, specifically known as Guadalupe Property Identification Number 67753, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez)      12.Ordinance 26-S-013 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 3  12.Ordinance 26-S-013 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 506 Main St. and 508 Main St., specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 32859 and 32861, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez)    Closed Session   13.The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 (consultation with attorney) and 551.074  to discuss the following matters: a. The legal issues and options related to concerns raised in relation to the City Council and social media (consultation with attorney). b. The options related to concerns with Councilmember Place 2 and social media pursuant to adopted city council policies.   14.The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 (consultation with attorney) to discuss the following matters:    a.  The legal issues and options regarding DTLC Investements, LLC, and JHDTLC, LLC v. City of Schertz, Texas No. C2026-0401A0533E (466th Judicial District, Comal County, Texas).    Reconvene into Regular Session   15.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item # 13a.   16.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item # 13b.   17.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item # 14a.    Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   18.June 2026 Major Projects in Progress/CIP   Requests and Announcements  June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 4  Requests and Announcements  Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff  Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council)   Adjournment   CERTIFICATION I, SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2026 AT 3:30 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.    SHEILA EDMONDSON    I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON ________DAY OF ___________________, 2026. TITLE: _______________________________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210-619-1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.    COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS     Mayor Rodriguez Member Audit Committee Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Liaison Board of Adjustments Senior Center Advisory Board-Alternate Councilmember Davis– Place 1 Member Interview Committee  Main Street Committee - Chair TIRZ II Board Liaison Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Schertz Housing Authority Board Transportation Safety Advisory Board June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 5  Councilmember Watson – Place 2 Member Audit Committee Liaison Library Advisory Board Senior Center Advisory Board Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) -Ex-Officio  Councilmember Macaluso – Place 3 Member Interview Committee  Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee TIRZ II Board   Councilmember Guerrero – Place 4 Member Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Liaison Schertz Historical Preservation Committee Councilmember Westbrook – Place 5 Member Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC)  Liaison   Planning and Zoning Commission Schertz Historical Preservation Committee Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation (CVLGC)-Alternate   Councilmember – Place 6 Member Animal Services Advisory Committee Audit Committee Interview Committee-Chair Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Liaison Building and Standards Commission Economic Development Corporation - Alternate Senior Center Advisory Board Councilmember Sheridan Place 7 Member Main Street Committee Liaison Economic Development Corporation     June 2, 2026  City Council Agenda                                Page 6  Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:City Secretary Subject:National Automotive Service Professionals Month-June 2026 Attachments National Automotive Service Professionals Month 2026 National Automotive Service Professional Month June 2026 Whereas, the City of Schertz is committed to delivering outstanding services that enhance the quality of life within our community and to recognizing those dedicated to that mission; and Whereas, the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (ASE), established in 1972, works to improve the quality of vehicle repair and service through the testing and certification of automotive professionals, and has designated June as National Automotive Service Professionals Month, including National Automotive Service Professionals Week, June 8-14, and National Automotive Service Professionals Day on June 12; and Whereas, the City of Schertz Fleet Department consists of seven employees with more than 75 years of combined experience in fleet management and mechanical service, providing preventive maintenance and complex repairs, which could include tire changes to rebuilding & replacing entire A/C systems, to keep city vehicles operating safely and efficiently; and Whereas, the City of Schertz Fleet Department remains dedicated to providing efficient, cost-effective, and customer-driven municipal fleet management services to support the daily operations of the City. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor of the City of Schertz do hereby proclaim the month of June 2026 is “NATIONAL AUTOMOTIVE SERVICE PROFESSIONALS MONTH” I encourage all citizens to thank and recognize the many contributions our Fleet Department Professionals who ensure our vehicles are roadway safe. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the Seal of the City of Schertz, Texas to be affixed on this 2ndth day of June 2026 ________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Executive Team Subject:Presentation of the 2026 Hal Baldwin Scholarship Recipient (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez) BACKGROUND At the City Council meeting on May 12, City Council approved Resolution 26-R-060, which awarded the following students as recipients of the 2026 Hal Baldwin Scholarship: Jordann Neskora - $5,000 Christopher Aikman - $5,000 Carli Moy - $2,500 Kaelyn Williams - $2,500 Kaelyn Williams was unable to attend the meeting on May 12, so she will be recognized at tonight's meeting. Agenda No. 1.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:City Secretary Subject:Minutes -Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on May 5, 2026 and Council Meeting on May 12, 2026 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney/I.Chavez) Attachments Draft Minutes 05-05-2026 Draft Minutes 05-12-2026 D R A F T MINUTES REGULAR MEETING May 5, 2026 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on May 5, 2026, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to-wit: Present: Mayor Ralph Rodriguez; Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis; Councilmember Paul Macaluso; Councilmember Michelle Watson; Councilmember Ben Guerrero; Councilmember Robert Westbrook; Councilmember Allison Heyward; Councilmember Robert Sheridan Staff present: City Manager Steve Williams; City Attorney Daniel Santee; Deputy City Manager Brian James; Assistant City Manager Sarah Gonzalez; City Secretary Sheila Edmondson; Assistant City Secretary Irene Chavez       Call to Order Mayor Rodriguez called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Macaluso) Councilmember Paul Macaluso provided the opening prayer and led the Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and the State of Texas.   Proclamations   57th Annual Professional Municipal Clerks Week - May 3-9, 2026 Mayor Rodriguez presented the 57th Annual Professional Municipal Clerks Week — May 3–9, 2026, proclamation to City Secretary Sheila Edmondson, Deputy City Secretary Sheree Courney, Assistant City Secretary Irene Chavez, and Records Management Coordinator Mellissa Zipp.   Economic Development Week - May 4-8, 2026 Councilmember Allison Heyward presented the Economic Development Week - May 4–8, 2026, proclamation to the Economic Development Corporation Executive Director Scott Wayman, Deputy Director Amy Madison, and Administrative Assistant Kimberly Lovejoy.   National Police Week — May 10-16, 2026, and Police Officer Memorial 1 National Police Week — May 10-16, 2026, and Police Officer Memorial Day—May 15, 2026 Mayor Rodriguez presented the National Police Week — May 10-16, 2026, and Police Officer Memorial Day — May 15, 2026, proclamations to Assistant Police Chief Phillip Waller, Police Lieutenant Darin S. LaCour, Police Sergeant John Eisen, and Police Officer Ashley Aldaba.   Employee Introductions Mayor Rodriguez recognized City Department Heads who introduced the following new staff: EDC: Administrative Assistant Kimberly Lovejoy Fire: Firefighters Elijah Bustos, Zachary Baldwin, Joseph Crisp, Albert Lopez, Peyton Stefek, and Ryan McCosh Parks: Administrative Assistant Taylor Corbin Police: Police Officer Ashley Aldaba Public Works-Drainage: Drainage Worker Trainees Kevin Joler and Gregory Mauldin Public Works-Street: Street Maintenance Worker Trainee Michael Padilla Public Works-Water: Water/Wastewater Operator Trainees Matthew Carpio, Kade Guardiola, Aaron Abel, Kevin Davis, Aishiteru Laterbach,Tyler Bradley, and Adam Kopas Utility Billing: Utility Billing Specialist Emilia Zapata   Presentations   Presentation on the 50th July 4th Jubilee and America 250 Celebration (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) Mayor Rodriguez introduced Recreation Manager Cassie Paddock who presented plans for the 50th July 4th Jubilee and America's 250th Celebration of Independence, noting expanded patriotic programming and community engagement leading up to the event. Preparations include patriotic-themed Movies and Music in the Park events, commemorative T-shirt sales, special street banners along Schertz Parkway and Main Street, historical social media features, and red, white, and blue Parks and Recreation Month shirts. Ms. Paddock reported that Project Flagline will take place June 29, with approximately 100 volunteers placing flags along Schertz Parkway, and flag removal scheduled for July 6. This year the celebration will expand to a two-day event on July 3 and 4. New July 3 activities include a concert at Pickrell Park featuring the Josh Abbott Band, carnival operations from 6:00 p.m.–10:00 p.m., food vendors, and shuttle service from the Schertz Soccer Complex to alleviate parking congestion. Traditional July 4 activities will continue, including the Freedom 5K, parade, carnival at Meyer Park, live music, food trucks, family activities, floating fireworks, and an expanded fireworks display pending approval. New activities include pie baking and pie eating contests. Ms. Paddock also announced a historic flyover coordinated with the Commemorative Air Force Central Texas Wing featuring a D-Day lead aircraft. The evening program at 2 Pickrell Park will include remarks from the Mayor and Council, the national anthem, and the fireworks finale.   Presentation of Kick Cancer Pep Rally & 5K Run 2026 Donation to Mays Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum/C.Paddock) Mayor Rodriguez recognized Parks Manager Cassie Paddock, who provided an overview of the annual Kick Cancer 5K held on March 7 in honor of former Council Member Tony Wilcheck. The event drew 467 runners, including 19 clubs and teams, with the largest team being the Pascal Patriots (103 participants). Activities included a pep rally with Clemens High School cheerleaders and a warm-up led by Recreation Specialist Amy Stevens. Sponsors included Iron Sponsors HEB and Schertz Emergency Clinic, and T-shirt sponsors GVEC, Schertz Bank and Trust, Bluebonnet Palace, Orange Theory Fitness, Rapid Plumbing, and Renewal by Anderson. Ms. Paddock presented a 2026 donation of $11,255.33 to May’s Cancer Center at UT Health San Antonio, bringing the total raised since the race’s inception to $237,517.92. Valerie Wilcheck, Tony Wilcheck’s wife, participated in the check presentation and photo with the Mayor.   YMCA-Presentation by CEO Louis Lopez -YMCA Presentation of Benefits and Opportunities Mayor Rodriguez introduced Louis Lopez, CEO of the YMCA of Greater San Antonio, who provided an update on services and partnerships at the Schertz Family YMCA, celebrating its 15th anniversary and the YMCA’s 150-year milestone. Mr. Lopez highlighted alignment with the City’s strategic plan to improve community wellbeing, noting that membership has grown from 696 in 2010 to 15,568, including over 2,000 seniors, achieving a 34% community penetration rate and a record net promoter score of 77. He outlined programs and impact statistics, including after-school programs serving over 500 children, summer camps and swim lessons for 300 participants, more than 3,000 youth sports participants, 8,000 swim skills lessons, over $100,000 in financial assistance, and 20 free community events serving more than 15,000 residents. Mental health counseling services were provided to veterans, seniors, teens, and families, with 250 sessions completed last year. Lopez also highlighted volunteer programs, healthy living initiatives, and a new partnership with Gordon Hartman and Morgan’s Wonderland to develop a YMCA designed for individuals with special needs and disabilities, which will serve as a model for the entire YMCA system.   City Events and Announcements Announcements of upcoming City Events (B.James/S.Gonzalez) Assistant City Manager Sarah Gonzalez provided the announcements of upcoming city events. Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S.Williams) City Manager Steve Williams announced a promotion for David Mosqueda from Drainage 3 Worker-Trainee to Water/Wastewater Operator Trainee in April. He also shared information regarding Schertz residents, David and Barbara Williams, who expressed their gratitude to Code Enforcement Officer Steve Miller, for his exceptional assistance identifying and trimming low hanging tree limbs to ensure compliance with city ordinance. Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R.Rodriguez) Mayor Rodriguez recognized City Secretary staff for the success of the banquet celebrating Boards, Committees, and Commissions volunteers. He also recognized the Samuel Clemens High School baseball team for advancing to the second round of the playoffs. Lastly, he thanked and commended staff who worked to ensure the 2026 Thunderbird Show was a successful event.   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Mayor Rodriguez recognized the following residents: Amber Cartton, 624 Heather Way, Seguin, introduced herself as a member of the Chamber's Leadership Core Class of 2026. She thanked the council and city staff for their leadership and service, noting her participation in the Chamber’s CORE Leadership Program has increased her appreciation for city operations and community service. Arthur Porter, 4328 Golden Oak, spoke in support of the Senior Center, commending its professional service to the community’s seniors and stating that city funds are being well spent. Daniel Jamerson, 1000 FM 78, speaking on behalf of the VFW, thanked the Mayor and Council for their service, announced upcoming VFW events including a breakfast and flag retirement ceremony, and encouraged community involvement and support. Raquel Gutierrez, 1016 Silvertree, raised concerns regarding alleged election-related conduct, including campaign sign handling, polling place interactions, public meeting camera positioning, and candidate forum behavior, and urged the Council to review the matters to preserve public trust and election integrity. 4 Edward Ryan Mercado, 101 Firestone, ceded his time to Raquel Gutierrez. Michele Tereletsky, 705 Marilyn Dr., thanked City staff and Public Works employees for their responsiveness and assistance with concerns related to the Senior Center and a water issue at her residence. She also thanked the mayor for his responsiveness to her phone calls and text messages. Dana Eldridge, 2628 Gallant Fox, addressed concerns regarding divisiveness in the community, expressed support for current and prospective city leadership, and commented on upcoming trash service rate considerations. Lauren Dalton, 117 Carmel Dr. Cibolo, introduced herself as a member of the Chamber's Leadership Core Class of 2026. She expressed appreciation for the Council and city staff, noting that her involvement with the Chamber and the Leadership CORE program has increased her understanding of and appreciation for city operations.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes-Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on April 21, 2026 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney/I.Chavez)   2.Resolution 26-R-058 - Authorizing an application for the FY 2027 Motor Vehicle Crime Prevention Authority Grant (S.Williams/J.Lowery)   3.Resolution 26-R-059 - Authorizing the Schertz/Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Budget Amendment for Fiscal Year 2025-2026 (B.James/L.Busch/N.Ferris)   4.Resolution 26-R-061 - Authorizing an amendment to the service agreement with Magic in the Sky, LLC, for an expanded fireworks display for the 50th Jubilee & America 250 Celebration. (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) Mayor Rodriguez asked if any items needed to be removed for separate action. No items were removed. Mayor Rodriguez asked for a motion to approve Consent Agenda Items # 1- 4.    Moved by Councilmember Allison Heyward, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis  AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, 5  AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Ben Guerrero, Councilmember Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Allison Heyward, Councilmember Robert Sheridan Passed   Closed Session Mayor Rodriguez recessed to closed session at 7:16 p.m.   5.The City Council will meet in closed session pursuant to Texas Government Code Sections 551.071 (consultation with attorney) and 551.074 (personnel) to discuss the following matters: a. The legal issues and options related to concerns raised in relation to the municipal special election (consultation with attorney). b. Discussion and deliberation regarding concerns raised about certain actions of the City Manager related to the municipal special election (personnel). The City Manager may request that any discussion and deliberation take place in a public hearing.   Reconvene into Regular Session Mayor Rodriguez reconvened Regular Session at 9:16 p.m.   6.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item # 5a. No action was taken based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item #5a.   7.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item # 5b. Mayor Rodriguez recognized Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis, who provided the following statement on behalf of City Council. After review in closed session with the City Attorney and City Manager and examination of applicable City Charter provisions, policies, and relevant records including email correspondence, considered six allegations of misconduct and/or political interference involving the City Manager. The Council found no substantiated or definitive violations of policy related to election processes or activities. The City Manager has been directed to remind all staff regarding City policies and standards governing political activity and interactions with candidates. A motion was made that no further action be taken by the City Council. The vote was paused when Councilmember Westbrook requested recognition to provide a statement. He identified two separate issues before the Council: the underlying actions of the City Manager and the transparency of the review process. Based on the information reviewed, Councilmember Westbrook agreed with the presumed outcome and found little fault with the City Manager’s actions. However, he expressed that the public would have been better served by a more transparent process within legal limits, noting that public 6 confidence depends not only on the outcome but also on understanding how the decision was reached. He encouraged Council to strengthen communication regarding the steps taken, standards applied, and any policy improvements considered in matters involving City leadership, with the goal of ensuring fair outcomes while maintaining as much transparency as legally possible. Mayor Rodriguez then restated the motion made by Mayor Pro Tem Davis, seconded by Councilmember Watson.    AYE: Mayor Pro Tem Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Ben Guerrero, Councilmember Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Allison Heyward, Councilmember Robert Sheridan Passed   Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   8.May 2026 Major Projects in Progress/CIP   9.Information Regarding Citywide AI & Technology Efficiencies (S.Gonzalez/B.James/S.Williams)   Requests and Announcements Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff No requests by Mayor or Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff. Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda No requests by Mayor or Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda. City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council) Councilmember Watson attended the volunteer banquet. Councilmember Macaluso attended the Air Show, the Hal Baldwin Committee meeting, and the Clemens first series in baseball playoffs. Councilmember Guerrero attended the Historical Preservation Committee meeting, close-out soccer ceremony, visited the library to recognize volunteers, annual volunteer banquet, and the Air Show. Councilmember Westbrook attended the Schertz Historical Preservation Society meeting, 7 the volunteer banquet, and the Schertz Bank and Trust/Chamber Golf Tournament. He also voted in the SCUCISD Bond election. Councilmember Heyward attended the volunteer banquet, and modeled in the Universal City first annual 55+ fashion show. Councilmember Sheridan attended the Nichole Kuhlmann retirement, the Air Show, a tour of SSLGC, and the volunteer banquet. He reminded residents to complete the trash survey which is in the Schertz magazine and on the website. Mayor Rodriguez attended the Air Show, emceed the volunteer banquet, played in the Schertz Bank and Trust/Chamber Golf Tournament, and took part in the closing ceremonies for soccer. He cheered on the Clemens baseball team and reminded residents to complete the trash survey.   Adjournment Mayor Rodriguez adjourned the meeting at 9:24 p.m.   _______________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, TRMC, City Secretary 8 Agenda No. 2.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:City Secretary Subject:City of Schertz Boards, Committees, and Commissions Appointments Reappointments Library Advisory Board for the term ending June 30, 2028: Beverly O Clarke Resignations, Removals, and Expiring Terms BACKGROUND In accordance with City policy and the Council Rules of Procedure, periodic appointments and reappointments to City boards, commissions, and committees are presented for City Council consideration. The following individuals are recommended for appointment and reappointment to the respective boards for the terms indicated below: Library Advisory Board Reappointments Term Ending June 30, 2028  Ms. Beverly O Clarke, Regular Board   Agenda No. 3.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Engineering Subject:Resolution 26-R-070- Authorizing a RCE funding application and Execution of Interlocal Agreements with Universal City and Cibolo for the Railroad Crossings Improvements Planning Study (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak) BACKGROUND As the City of Schertz has grown, traffic has increased along the FM 78 corridor. When trains are present there is little to no access onto and off FM 78. This issue is also present in surrounding cities. City staff have had meetings with staff in both Universal City and Cibolo to submit a joint application for the Crossing Safety / Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant funding program. The RCE funding grant program is geared toward funding improvement projects that focus on improving traffic mobility and safety.  The program provides funding for planning studies; project development; and construction.  RCE funded studies and projects require a minimum of a 20% local funding match from the applicant and "overmatching" the funding request increases the application's ranking in the selection process Council approval is needed in order to apply for RCE funding.  The funding application deadline is June 8, 2026. The goal of this joint application is improve overall traffic flow and reduce train-related incidents along the FM 78 rail corridor in all three cities.  The Planning Study request will examine all the crossings in the corridor, except for the FM 78/FM 3009 crossing since an improvement project is already underway for this crossing, to examine what improvements would be appropriate and develop preliminary cost estimates.  The results of this study could be built upon to apply for additional funding through the program to develop construction projects to implement the recommended improvements.  By partnering with Universal City and Cibolo and studying the corridor, complimentary improvements that may work together more efficiently can be identified and the future planned improvements better coordinated. For this application, one City needs to "take the lead" and be the official applicant.  Universal City and Cibolo will be listed in the application as co-applicants, but the project will be managed by the City of Schertz.  In order for the City of Schertz to be able to collect the local match portions from Universal City and Cibolo for this study, Interlocal Agreements would also need to be executed.  The intersections that will be studied are Pat Booker Rd; FM 1518; 1st Street; Randolph; Schertz Parkway; FM 1103; and Country Lane. GOAL The goal of Resolution 26-R-070 is Council Authorization of a RCE funding application; for the City Manager to sign and execute interlocal agreements with Universal City and Cibolo for the funding of the Railroad Crossings Improvements Planning Study. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Traffic studies and improvement of railroad crossing along FM 78 will help alleviate traffic and create Traffic studies and improvement of railroad crossing along FM 78 will help alleviate traffic and create a more efficient flow of traffic crossing the railroad path. Securing RCE funding will significantly enhance city staff’s understanding of traffic movements at these intersections and identify improvements which will increase mobility and safety at these railroad crossings. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Council authorize the City Manager to submit a RCE funding application to study the railroad crossings in the FM 78 rail corridor in Universal City, Shertz, and Cibolo and for the City Manager to sign and execute Interlocal Agreements with Universal City and Cibolo for their respective local matches for the Railroad Crossings Improvements Planning Study. FISCAL IMPACT The current estimated cost for the study is approximately $200,000 for each intersection.  It is proposed that the City provide a 25% match ($50,000 per crossing for a total of $200,000) to increase the project scoring during the selection process. The total study cost would be approximately $1,400,000 for 7 intersections across Schertz, Universal City, and Cibolo corridor. With external funding each city would provide a local match of at least 20% of the funding for the intersection studies in their jurisdiction. In order to guarantee a more competitive application submittal, the Cities of Schertz, Universal City, and Cibolo will consider matching between 20-30% of the projected cost.  The local match for each city is as follows:  City Match Range Schertz (4 crossings)$200,000 Universal City (1 crossing)$40,000 - $60,000 Cibolo (2 crossings)$80,000 - $120,000 Funding for the City of Schertz's local match will come from the Fund Balance of the General Fund. There is also a cost to create and submit the grant application.  The estimated cost for this is $46,542.80.  The cost per crossing for the application would be 1/7 of this amount ($6,648.97).  The Interlocal Agreements with Universal City and Cibolo will also secure funding from the cities for their proportionate share of the application costs. Schertz' estimated portion would be $26,598.88 to be paid from the Engineering Department's operating budget. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 26-R-070. Attachments Resolution 26-R-070 with attachments RESOLUTION 26-R-070 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING APPLYING FOR A RCE GRANT AND INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS WITH THE CITY OF UNIVERSAL CITY AND THE CITY OF CIBOLO WHEREAS, the Cities of Schertz, Universal City, and Cibolo wish to evaluate railroad crossings along the FM 78 corridor in their respective jurisdictions to identify appropriate safety and access improvements to the crossings in a collective effort; and WHEREAS, grant funding is available via the Crossing Safety/Railroad Crossing Elimination (RCE) grant program; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Schertz, Universal City, and Cibolo all wish to pursue grant funding to study the railroad crossings along FM 78 in their respective jurisdictions; and WHEREAS, there is a 20 percent minimum local match required for the grant funding, with extra points added for overmatching; and WHEREAS, one City must take the lead and be the official applicant and project manager for the RCE grant; and WHEREAS, earlier meetings between the three city’s staff determined that it would be most appropriate for the City of Schertz to be the RCE grant applicant and project manager; and WHEREAS, the Cities of Universal City and Cibolo are willing to enter into an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Schertz to provide funding for their portions of the local match required for the grant; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Schertz wishes authorize the City Manager to apply for the RCE grant to study the railroad crossings and execute Interlocal Agreements with the City of Universal City and the City of Cibolo related to the RCE grant; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to apply for a RCE grant to study the railroad crossings along FM 78 in Schertz, Universal City, and Cibolo as identified in attached Exhibit A and authorizes the City Manager to execute Interlocal Agreements in substantially the same format as attached Exhibit B with the Cities of Universal City and Cibolo for their portion of the RCE grant local match. Section 2. The City Council hereby commits to an overmatch of 25 percent of requested grant funds. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 4. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 8. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the _______ day of _______________, 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary EXHIBIT A RAILROAD CROSSINGS TO BE STUDIED Universal City: Pat Booker Road and FM 78 City of Cibolo: FM 1103 and FM 78 Country Lane and FM 78 City of Schertz: FM 1518 and FM 78 1st Street and FM 78 Randolph Avenue and FM 78 Schertz Parkway and FM 78 EXHIBIT B INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND THE CITY OF [Insert City Name] TEXAS, REGARDING RCE GRANT LOCAL MATCH FOR RAILROAD CROSSINGS STUDY This Interlocal Agreement regarding the shared costs of the local match for the RCE Grant Planning Study for railroad crossings along the FM 78 corridor (the “Agreement”), is entered into between the City of Schertz (“Schertz”) a Texas municipal corporation acting by and through its City Council, and the City of [insert name] (“[insert name]”) a Texas municipal corporation acting by and through its respective City Council, pursuant to authority granted under the Interlocal Cooperation Act, Chapter 791, Texas Government Code, as the same may be amended from time to time, to be effective as of the date on which the last Party signs this Agreement (the “Effective Date”). Schertz and [insert name] are collectively referred to herein as the “Parties” and are each a “Party”. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Chapter 791 of the Texas Government Code, as amended, titled Interlocal Cooperation Contracts, authorizes contracts between political subdivisions for the performance of governmental functions and services; and, WHEREAS, the City of Schertz and the City of [insert name] wish to collectively study railroad crossings along the FM 78 corridor via a RCE grant the (“Project”); and, WHEREAS, [insert name] has requested Schertz act as the entity making the grant application and managing the Project; and WHEREAS, the RCE grant has a minimum 20% local match requirement; and, WHEREAS, [insert name] seeks to provide its proportionate share of the required local match for the Project; and, NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements herein contained, the sufficiency of which are acknowledged, and subject to the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: I. Purpose and Scope 1.1 To ensure adequate traffic flow and to protect the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the Parties, the railroad crossings along FM 78 will be analyzed to determine appropriate improvements that could be made to the crossings to improve safety and access. 1.2 The process will include applying for RCE grant funding for the Project, with Schertz applying for the RCE grant and managing the Project to secure approval for cost share from [insert name] for the RCE grant’s local match requirement from [insert name] to Schertz. L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ - 4 - 1.3 Schertz shall be the applicant for the RCE grant and will act as the project manager for the Project. II. Term of the Agreement 2.1 The term of this Agreement shall begin upon approval by the governing bodies of the Parties and full execution by the designated officials. 2.2 This Agreement shall terminate when the Project is completed, and the proportionate share of the local match for all documented Project costs reimbursed to Schertz by [insert name], or [insert months] months, whichever is sooner. This Agreement may be extended if additional time is necessary to complete the Project and as agreed upon by the Parties. 2.3 Any Party may terminate this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Parties. Notice must be received no less than 30 days before the release of the formal solicitation for the Project construction. If [insert name] terminates this Agreement all documented Project costs accrued on the date of communication to the other Parties shall be submitted to [insert name] and will be due from [insert name] to Schertz. III. Responsibilities of Schertz 3.1 Act as the entity responsible for all aspects of project management, including contracting for the Project as well as vendor management and payment through Project completion. 3.2 Act as the recipient of RCE grant funding for costs associated with Project. 3.3 Hold regular Project meetings with [insert name] to inform of Project progress and solicit input from [insert name] on the work product. 3.4 Provide to [insert name] evidence of paid invoices for all documented Project costs. 3.5 Upon request, provide [insert name] additional Project updates via email. 3.6 Accept reimbursement from [insert name]. IV. Responsibilities of [insert name] 5.1 Provide approval of Project application cost and local match cost based on the estimated cost of the application and grant local match for the Project through written communication from [insert name] Administrator. The maximum local match for the Project is estimated to be $[insert amount]. The maximum application cost will be [insert fraction] of the actual application cost. 5.2 If the approval per 5.1 is not given, provide Schertz notice of termination of the project and reimburse Schertz the local match for all documented Project costs incurred to that date. L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ - 4 - 5.3 The actual local match cost will be calculated as the local match percentage [insert %] of the actual Project study costs for the [insert location(s)] crossings. Each crossing study local match cost will be one-seventh (1/7) of the total Project cost. 5.4 Upon submission of a request for payment from Schertz for the proportionate share of the application cost, reimburse Schertz within 90 calendar days 5.5 Upon submission of a request for payment from Schertz, reimburse Schertz the local match of the Project costs within 90 calendar days. V. Binding Effect; Benefiting Parties 6.1 This Agreement shall bind and benefit the respective Parties and their legal successors, but shall not otherwise be assignable, in whole or in part, by any Party without first obtaining the written consent of the other Parties. 6.2 This Agreement inures to the benefit of and obligates only the Parties. No term or provision of this Agreement shall benefit or obligate any person or entity not a Party to the Agreement. The Parties shall cooperate fully in opposing any attempt by any third person or entity to claim any benefit, protection, release, or other consideration under this Agreement. VI. Governmental Functions; Liability; No Waiver of Immunity or Defenses 7.1 Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary herein, this Agreement is a contract for and with respect to the performance of governmental functions by governmental entities. 7.1.1 The services provided for herein are governmental functions, and the Cities shall be engaged in the conduct of a governmental function while providing and/or performing any service pursuant to this Agreement. 7.1.2 The relationship of the Cities shall, with respect to that part of any service or function undertaken as a result of or pursuant to this Agreement, be that of independent contractors. 7.1.3 Nothing contained herein shall be deemed or construed by the Parties, or by any third party, as creating the relationship of principal and agent, partners, joint ventures, or any other similar such relationship between the Parties. 7.2 Each Party reserves and does not waive any defense available to it at law or in equity as to any claim or cause of action whatsoever that may arise or result from or in connection with this Agreement. This Agreement shall not be interpreted nor construed to give to any third party the right to any claim or cause of action, and no Party shall be held legally liable for any claim or cause of action arising pursuant to or in connection with this Agreement except as specifically provided herein or by law. L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ - 4 - 7.3 No Party waives or relinquishes any immunity or defense on behalf of itself, its Councilmembers, officers, employees, and agents as a result of the execution of this Agreement and the performance of the covenants and agreements contained herein. 7.4 Any party paying for the performance of governmental functions or services will make those payments from current revenues available to the paying party. VIII. Notices 8.1 All correspondence and communications concerning this Agreement shall be directed to: SCHERTZ: City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: City Manager [insert name]: City of [insert name] [insert address] [insert name], Texas [zip code] Attention: City Manager [insert name] With a copy to: Denton Navarro Rodriguez Bernal Santee & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: Daniel Santee Notices required hereunder shall be hand-delivered or sent by prepaid certified mail, return receipt requested. IX. Severability 9.1 If any provision of this Agreement shall be deemed void or invalid, such provision shall be severed from the remainder of this Agreement, which shall remain in force and effect to the extent that it does not destroy the benefit of the bargain. X. Entire Agreement 10.1 This Agreement is the entire agreement between the Parties as to the subject matter hereof and supersedes any prior understanding or written or oral agreement relative to the subject matter hereof. This Agreement may be amended only by written instrument duly approved and executed by both Parties in accordance with the formalities of this Agreement. Any funds necessary for the completion of this Agreement have been or will be allocated in a manner authorized by law and in compliance with municipal budgeting principles. XI. Governing Law; Venue 11.1 All Parties agree that this Agreement shall be construed under the laws of the State of Texas, and obligations under the Agreement shall be performed in [insert county] County, Texas. L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ - 4 - In the event that any legal proceeding is brought to enforce this Agreement or any provision hereof, the same shall be brought in the State Courts of [insert county] County, Texas. The Parties agree to submit to the jurisdiction of said court. [ Signatures and acknowledgements on the following pages ] L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ S-1 SIGNATURE PAGE TO INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SCHERTZ AND [insert name], TEXAS REGARDING THE STUDY OF FM 78 RAILROAD CROSSINGS The Parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the dates set forth below to be effective as of the Effective Date. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS By: _______________________________ Steve Williams, City Manager THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of __________________, 2026, by Steve Williams, the City Manager of the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. [ Seal ] Notary Public in and for the State of Texas L & B 07318/0002/L2160281.DOCX/ S-3 SIGNATURE PAGE TO INTERLOCAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITIES OF SCHERTZ AND [insert name], TEXAS REGARDING THE STUDY OF FM 78 RAILROAD CROSSINGS CITY OF [INSERT NAME] By: [insert name], City Administrator THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF [INSERT COUNTY] § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of __________________, 2026, by [insert name], City Administrator of [insert name], a political subdivision of the State of Texas, on behalf of said entity. [ Seal ] Notary Public in and for the State of Texas Agenda No. 4.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Engineering Subject:Resolution 26-R-069 - Authorizing a Roadway Capital Recovery Offset and Reimbursement Agreement for Schertz Station Development (B.James/K.Woodlee/J.Nowak) BACKGROUND Previously a Roadway Capital Recovery Agreement was approved for the Schertz Station development.  The agreement provided for a Roadway Impact Fee credit for the extension of Ripps Kreusler through the development.  Ripps Kreusler is a collector roadway identified in the City’s Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP). While the Ripps Kreusler extension provided for a significant credit for the Development’s Roadway Impact Fees, the developer was still required to pay a portion of the fees ($40,000). When the Capital Recovery Agreement was done during the development process, one item of public infrastructure was inadvertently overlooked.  The item overlooked was the multi-use path along Cibolo Valley Drive.  Cibolo Valley Drive is identified as a secondary arterial by the MTP.  The pathway is part of the roadway section in the MTP, so construction of the pathway would also be eligible for a Roadway Impact Fee credit. The developer is constructing the pathway along the development’s Cibolo Valley Drive frontage.  Determining the exact amount of the Roadway Impact Fee credit is challenging because the MTP does not provide guidance on how to perform such a calculation, unlike providing for calculations for adding lanes to a roadway or building a roadway extension.  Staff negotiated with the developer an equitable credit amount for the multi-use pathway construction.  The credit amount to be reimbursed will be half of the cost of the multi-use pathway, up to a maximum amount of $100,000.  To reimburse the developer for constructing the multi-use path, a new, revised Roadway Capital Recovery Agreement needs to be executed. Staff prepared a new agreement modeled after the previously approved agreement.  All the “front end” language of the agreement remains the same.  Changes were made to the exhibits to the agreement to add in the multi-use pathway construction and identify the amount to be reimbursed to the developer for the pathway construction. GOAL The goal of Resolution 26-R-069 is Council Authorizing the City Manager to sign and execute a revised Capital Recovery Agreement with the Schertz Station development to give them credit in the form of a partial reimbursement for construction of the multi-use path along their Cibolo Valley Drive frontage. COMMUNITY BENEFIT The construction of the multi-use path along the east side of Cibolo Valley Drive provides for pedestrian and bicycle traffic from the development’s southernmost point to Ripps Kreusler.  This provides a safe pathway for area residents to walk and bike, separate from vehicular traffic. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends Council authorize a revised Capital Recovery Agreement with the Schertz Station development to include roadway impact fee credit for construction of the multi-use path along Cibolo Valley Drive. FISCAL IMPACT The maximum cost of the Roadway Impact Fee credit for the multi-use pathway is $100,000.  The actual cost will be half of the construction costs (estimated to be between $80,000 and $100,000) of the multi-use pathway. Funding is available from the Roadway Impact Fee Account for Service Area 1. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 26-R-069. Attachments Resolution 26-R-069 with attachments RESOLUTION 26-R-069 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A CAPITAL RECOVERY OFFSET AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE SCHERTZ STATION DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Schertz approved Resolution 24-R-10 on February 20, 2024 approving a Capital Recovery Offset Agreement for the Schertz Station development, and WHEREAS, in accordance with Ordinance 78-178 Roadway Capital Recovery Fees, the City shall offset the reasonable value of transportation system facilities through an offset agreement; and WHEREAS, the earlier approved offset agreement for the Schertz Station development inadvertently did not include construction of a multi-use path along the development’s Cibolo Valley Drive frontage; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Schertz wishes to enter into a new Capital Recovery Offset and Reimbursement Agreement for the Schertz Station development that includes construction of the multi-use path along the Cibolo Valley Drive frontage; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a Capital Recovery Offset Agreement in substantially the same format as attached Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the _______ day of _______________, 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary EXHIBIT A SCHERTZ STATION CAPITAL RECOVERY OFFSET AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § § GUADALUPE COUNTY § ROADWAY CAPITAL RECOVERY OFFSET AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT This Roadway Capital Recovery Offset and Reimbursement Agreement (this “AGREEMENT”) is made by and between the City of Schertz (hereinafter “CITY”), a Texas Home Rule municipality and CV SCHERTZ TX BTR, LP (hereinafter “DEVELOPER”), a Texas limited partnership created under the laws of Texas, collectively, the “PARTIES”. RECITALS WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Schertz Code of Municipal Ordinances Chapter 78, Article VII, the City of Schertz has adopted Roadway Capital Recovery Fees (sometimes hereinafter referred to as “capital recovery fee”); and, WHEREAS, pursuant to City of Schertz Code of Municipal Ordinances Section 78-178, where, in order to serve new development, a developer is required to construct, contribute to, or dedicate, capital improvement or facility expansion identified in the capital improvements plan, the CITY and DEVELOPER may enter into this AGREEMENT whereby the developer is: (1) credited for the reasonable and necessary costs of the capital improvement or facility expansion against the impact fees otherwise due from the new development; or (2) reimbursed for all or a portion of the reasonable and necessary costs of the capital improvement or facility expansion from impact fees as received from other new developments that use the capital improvement or facility expansion; and, WHEREAS, CITY and DEVELOPER desire to enter into this AGREEMENT in order to memorialize Roadway Capital Recovery Fee Credits (sometimes hereinafter referred to as the “Credits”) achieved by DEVELOPER for reasonable and necessary costs of the capital improvement or facility expansion it incurred. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing recitals and the mutual covenants and agreements contained herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and adequacy of which are hereby acknowledged, the PARTIES hereto, intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: Article I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION A. Project. The Project is the approximately 71-acre Schertz Station mixed use development located at the intersection of IH-35 and Cibolo Valley Drive in the City of Schertz municipal boundaries. The Project will include a mixture of residential and commercial uses. The Schertz Station Subdivision Preliminary Plat (“Preliminary Plat”) was approved by the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission on October 25, 2023, and is attached hereto as Exhibit A. B. Roadway Improvements. The Schertz Station Subdivision – Multifamily Plat (“Final Plat”) is a proposed final plat included within the Preliminary Plat boundaries. This Final Plat includes roadway improvements and dedications to be made by DEVELOPER, as further outlined in Exhibit B. Article II. ROADWAY CAPITAL RECOVERY FEES A. Roadway Capital Recovery Fees. The Roadway Capital Recovery Fees for the project are currently assessed as $1,000 per service unit for residential uses and $175 for nonresidential use per service unit. Article III. CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN IMPROVEMENTS MADE BY DEVELOPER A. Rough Proportionality. The PARTIES acknowledge that as provided in Texas Local Government Code Section 212.904, the CITY may require DEVELOPER to contribute a portion of the costs of municipal infrastructure improvements by the making of dedications, the payment of fees, or the payment of construction costs (collectively the “Infrastructure Costs”), provided DEVELOPER’S portion of the Infrastructure Costs do not exceed the amount required for infrastructure improvements that are roughly proportionate to the impact of the Project. Article IV. ROADWAY CAPITAL RECOVERY FEE OFFSET CREDIT A. Roadway Capital Recovery Fee Offset Credit Calculation. As shown on Exhibit C, to this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES agree to the following: i. The total number of service unit equivalents of capacity supplied by the system facility contributed by the DEVELOPER for the Final Plat is estimated to be 625.57 vehicle miles. ii. The Roadway Capital Recovery Fee Offset Credit that DEVELOPER is eligible to receive is 625.57 service units towards the Credit. iii. The Roadway Capital Recovery Fee Offset Credits that the DEVELOPER shall receive may be used to offset the roadway impact fees due from within the Project. The City shall accept Credits at time of issuance of building permit. iv. DEVELOPER shall receive the Roadway Capital Recovery Fee Offset Credit upon execution of this AGREEMENT. Provided, however, DEVELOPER shall complete the public improvements shown on Exhibit B, and the City shall accept the same for public maintenance in accordance with the terms of applicable provisions of the City’s Code of Ordinances prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy associated with the Final Plat. Article V. REIMBURSEMENT OF EXCESS OFFSETS A. DEVELOPER may apply for reimbursement of excess offsets following either completion of all development subject to the plat with which the excess offsets are associated or after ten (10) years following execution of this AGREEMENT. i. The DEVELOPER must apply for reimbursement within six months following either: a. Completion of the Project development subject to the plat with which the excess offsets are associated; or b. Ten years after the date of execution of this AGREEMENT. ii. The excess reimbursement shall be enforced in accordance with the following terms: a. The excess offset amount to be reimbursed shall be equal to the number of excess offsets (expressed as a number of service units) multiplied by a fraction equal to the capital recovery fee per service unit to be collected, as set forth herein in effect on the date of execution of this AGREEMENT, divided by the maximum assessable capital recovery fee per service unit, as set forth in the capital recovery plan, established in accordance with the City of Schertz Code of Municipal Ordinances Chapter 78, Article VII, in effect on the date of execution of this AGREEMENT; b. The amount to be reimbursed for excess offsets may be further equitably reduced, if fewer than 50 percent of the number of service units in the plat with which the system facility giving rise to the excess offset have been developed on the date of application for excess offsets; c. Repayment of excess offsets shall be made within five years from the date of execution of a reimbursement agreement between the PARTIES hereto pertaining to the applicable excess offsets from roadway capital recovery fees collected within the same roadway service area in which the property in question is located, subject to the availability of such funds; d. Termination or reduction of the CITY’s authority under state law to impose capital recovery fees for roadway facilities shall terminate or correspondingly reduce any obligation of the CITY to make payments under this AGREEMENT or any reimbursement agreement; and e. In converting the excess offsets from service unit equivalents to a dollar value, the number of service unit equivalents shall be multiplied by the value of a service unit expressed in dollars using the rates in effect at the time this AGREEMENT was executed. B. Execution of an excess offset reimbursement agreement with respect to a plat as provided for in above pursuant to City of Schertz Code of Municipal Ordinances Section 78-178 shall automatically terminate any excess offsets associated with that plat pursuant to this AGREEMENT. Any new development within the area subject to such plat shall pay roadway capital recovery fees then in effect under said Municipal Ordinance. Article VI. MISCELLANEOUS The following miscellaneous provisions are made part of this AGREEMENT: 1. Additional Instruments. CITY and DEVELOPER agree and covenant to cooperate, negotiate in good faith, and to execute such other and further instruments and documents as may be reasonably required to fulfill the public purposes provided for and included within this AGREEMENT. 2. Amendments. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire understanding and agreement of the PARTIES as to the matters set forth in this AGREEMENT. No alteration of or amendment to this AGREEMENT shall be effective unless given in writing and signed by the party or parties sought to be charged or bound by the alteration or amendment. 3. Applicable Law and Venue. This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas, and all obligations of the PARTIES created hereunder are performable in Guadalupe County, Texas. Venue for any action arising under this AGREEMENT shall lie in the state district courts of Guadalupe County, Texas. 4. Assignment. The DEVELOPER may assign this AGREEMENT with the CITY’s consent (such consent not to be unreasonably conditioned, withheld or delayed, but in no event shall the offsets provided for in the AGREEMENT be transferred to any development not subject to the Preliminary Plat associated with such offsets). 5. Binding Obligation. This AGREEMENT shall become a binding obligation on the signatories upon execution by all signatories hereto. The CITY warrants and represents that the individual executing this AGREEMENT on behalf of the CITY has full authority to execute this AGREEMENT and bind the CITY to the same. DEVELOPER warrants and represents that the individual executing this AGREEMENT on its behalf has full authority to execute this AGREEMENT and bind it to the same. 6. Counterparts. This AGREEMENT may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original and all of which shall constitute one and the same document. 7. Construction. The PARTIES acknowledge that the PARTIES and their counsel have reviewed and revised the AGREEMENT and that the normal rule of construction to the effect that any ambiguities are to be resolved against the drafting party shall not be employed in the interpretation of the AGREEMENT. 8. Enforcement. The City Attorney or his or her designee may enforce all legal rights and obligations under this AGREEMENT without further authorization. DEVELOPER shall provide to the City Attorney all documents and records that the City Attorney requests to assist in determining DEVELOPER’S compliance with this AGREEMENT. 9. Entire Agreement. This AGREEMENT constitutes the entire agreement between the PARTIES with respect to the subject matter covered in this AGREEMENT. There is no other collateral oral or written agreement between the PARTIES that, in any manner, relates to the subject matter of this AGREEMENT, except as provided for in any Exhibits attached hereto or duly approved amendments to this AGREEMENT, as approved by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas. 10. Execution of Agreement. a. City Council has authorized the City Manager to execute this AGREEMENT on behalf of the CITY, as evidenced by Resolution _________________, dated ______________, 2026. b. Sara Hanback is authorized to execute this AGREEMENT on DEVELOPER’S behalf. 11. Exhibits and Attachments. All Exhibits and Attachments referenced in this AGREEMENT are attached hereto and incorporated herein for all purposes. 12. Force Majeure. It is expressly understood and agreed by the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT that if the performance of any obligations hereunder is delayed by reason of war, civil commotion, acts of God, inclement weather, fire or other casualty, or court injunction, inability to obtain labor or materials or reasonable substitutes therefore, governmental restrictions, governmental regulations, governmental controls, governmental action, delay in issuance of permits or approvals (including, without limitation, fire marshal approvals), enemy or hostile governmental action, civil commotion, fire or other casualty, and other causes beyond the reasonable control of the obligated party and delays caused by the other party, the party so obligated or permitted shall be excused from doing or performing the same during such period of delay, so that the time period applicable to such obligation or requirement shall be extended for a period of time equal to the period such party was delayed. 13. Gender. The gender of the wording throughout this AGREEMENT shall always be interpreted to mean either sex, and where the context requires, the plural of any word shall include the singular. 14. Governmental Records. All invoices, records and other documents required for submission to the CITY pursuant to the terms of this AGREEMENT are Governmental Records for the purposes of Texas Penal Code Section 37.10. 15. Immunities and defenses. a. By entering into this AGREEMENT, the PARTIES do not waive, and shall not be deemed to have waived, any rights, immunities, or defenses either may have, including the defense of the PARTIES, and nothing contained herein shall ever be construed as a waiver of sovereign, statutory or official immunity by the CITY with such rights being expressly reserved to the fullest extent authorized by law and to the same extent which existed prior to the execution hereof. b. No employee of CITY, or any councilmember or agent of CITY, shall be personally responsible for any liability arising under or growing out of this AGREEMENT. 16. Mutual Assistance. CITY and DEVELOPER will do all things reasonably necessary or appropriate to carry out the terms and provisions of this AGREEMENT and to aid and assist each other in carrying out such terms and provisions. 17. Notices. Any notice, statement and/or communication required and/or permitted to be delivered hereunder shall be in writing and shall be mailed by first-class mail, postage prepaid, or delivered by hand, by messenger, by facsimile, or by reputable overnight carrier, and shall be deemed delivered when received at the addresses of the PARTIES set forth below, or at such other address furnished in writing to the other PARTIES thereto: If to Developer: CV SCHERTZ TX BTR, LP c/o Embrey 7600 Broadway, Suite 300 San Antonio, Texas 78209 Attention: Jeremy Williams With a copy to: Killen, Griffin & Farrimond, PLLC 10101 Reunion Place, Suite 250 San Antonio, Texas 78216 Attention: Ashley Farrimond If to the City: City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: City Manager With copy to: Denton Navarro Rodriguez Bernal Santee & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: T. Daniel Santee 18. Ordinance Applicability. The signatories hereto shall be subject to all ordinances of CITY, whether now existing or in the future arising provided however no ordinance shall reduce or diminish the contractual obligations contained herein. This AGREEMENT shall confer no vested rights on the Project unless specifically enumerated herein. 19. Severability. In the event any provision of this AGREEMENT is illegal, invalid, or unenforceable under the present or future laws, then, and in that event, it is the intention of the PARTIES hereto that the remainder of this AGREEMENT shall not be affected thereby, and it is also the intention of the PARTIES to this AGREEMENT that in lieu of each clause or provision that is found to be illegal, invalid, or unenforceable a provision be added to this AGREEMENT which is legal, valid and enforceability and is a similar in terms as possible to the provision found to be illegal, invalid or unenforceable. 20. Survival of Covenants. Any of the representations, warranties, covenants, and obligations of the PARTIES, as well as any rights and benefits of the PARTIES, pertaining to a period of time following the termination of this AGREEMENT shall survive termination. EXECUTED in duplicate originals to be effective as of the date of the last signature below (the “Effective Date”). Signature Pages to Follow This Roadway Capital Recovery Offset Agreement has been executed by the PARTIES as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. DEVELOPER: CV SCHERTZ TX BTR, LP, a Texas limited partnership By: CV Schertz BTR GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its General Partner By: _______________________ Name: Sara Hanback Title: Vice President of Finance THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF BEXAR § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of __________, 2026 by Sara Hanback, Vice President of Finance, CV Schertz BTR GP, LLC, General Partner, CV SCHERTZ TX BTR, LP. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: City: CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas municipal corporation By: Name: Steve Williams, City Manager Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS § § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the ____ day of _______________, 2026 by Steve Williams, City Manager of the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT “A” Project/Preliminary Plat EXHIBIT “B” Depiction of System Roadway Improvements Roadway Improvements: o Extension of Ripps Kreusler Road o 8’ wide sidewalk along Ripps Kreusler Road o Intersection Plans at Cibolo Valley Drive and Ripps Kreusler Road (Traffic Signalization) o Intersection Plans for Ripps Kreusler Road and other driveway(s) o IH-35 Deceleration Lane o Multi-Use Path along Cibolo Valley Drive, from southern development boundary to Ripps-Kreusler EXHIBIT “C” Roadway Capital Recovery Fees Calculation Service Area 1 Impact fee CIP projects being constructed: 29 E/W Collector 5 [Ripps-Kreusler] is a UC – Undivided Collector and the Multi-Use Path for 27 N/S Connector (1) [Cibolo Valley Drive] Hourly Vehicle-Mile Capacity per Lane Mile of Roadway Facility for an Undivided Collector is 500 Length being constructed: 2,202 feet full width – 3 lanes (center left turn lane receives credit as a lane. Includes ROW dedication). Multi-Use Path length: 1,440 feet Credit Calculations 2,202’ x 3 lanes = 6,606 lane feet 500 VM per LM = 0.0947 VM per Lane Foot 6,606 lane feet x 0.0947 = 625.57 vehicles miles of credit 2.09 vehicle miles per development unit for apartments 625.57/2.09 = 299.30 units of credit Reimbursement of Excess Construction Credit Multi-Use Pathway: ½ the actual construction costs of the path. *For informational purposes only – estimated path construction cost is $160,000, thus the City would reimburse the developer $80,000 once the path construction is complete and accepted by the City. Agenda No. 5.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Purchasing Subject:Resolution 26-R-074 - Authorizing an amendment to the billboard lease agreement with Clear Channel Outdoor, LLC (S.Williams/B.James) BACKGROUND Council approved the purchase of 2.37 acres at 12235 Aztec Way on March 3, 2026 via resolution 26-R-040. This property is at the southeast corner of FM 78 and Aztec Way. The Cibolo Creek runs through this property. A small portion of the property along Aztec Way is not in the City limits. Purchasing it allowed the city to better maintain the property for drainage purposes. It also will allow the City to ensure the property is kept free of debris and refuse.The property is adjacent to Palm Park. There is currently a billboard lease on this property. The lease started in August 2021 and is for 10 years, at a rate currently of $2,400.00 per year. Unless all parties were willing to dissolve the agreement, the lease terms need to be accepted along with the sale of the property. The proposed amendment to the lease agreement outlines that rent payments will increase to $3,500 per year in 2031 (or 20% of net advertising revenue - whichever is greater), and has a 10% increase every 5 years. Additionally, the end of the term of the Lease will be extended to thirty (30) years from the effective date of this amendment (2056). Once this amendment is authorized by Council, the sale of the property can be finalized. GOAL Provide for a safe and livable community. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Improve property conditions and the overall appearance of the City. Promote environmental stewardship and health. Develop water, wastewater and drainage infrastructure. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 26-R-074 authorizing the amendment to the billboard lease agreement. FISCAL IMPACT This is a revenue source for the City. Rent payments are currently $2,400 per year, which will increase to $3,500 per year in 2031. It has a 10% increase every 5 years. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 26-R-074 Attachments Resolution 26-R-074 with attachment Assignment of Lease Agreement Original Lease Agreement with Clear Channel RESOLUTION 26-R-074 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE BILLBOARD LEASE AGREEMENT ON PROPERTY AT 12235 AZTEC WAY AND RELATED MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. WHEREAS, The City of Schertz desires to improve property conditions and the overall appearance of the City, promote environmental stewardship and health, develop water, wastewater and drainage infrastructure; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of 2.37 acres at 12235 Aztec Way will serve to create a safe and livable community; and WHEREAS, the acquisition is consistent with the City’s goal of making infrastructure investments; and WHEREAS, Council authorized the acquisition on March 3, 2026 via resolution 26- R-040 and WHEREAS, there is currently a billboard lease agreement on the property that must terminate or convey with the sale of the property; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz wishes to accept the terms of the lease agreement as amended in Exhibit A attached hereto NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the amendment to the billboard lease agreement in substantially the form as set forth in Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with thelaws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the _______ day of _______________, 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit A Amendment to Billboard Lease Agreement CCO LLC/April 2019 1 AMENDMENT TO LEASE (Lease # 7484) THIS LEASE AMENDMENT (this “Amendment”), dated to be effective this ___ day of _______ 20__ (the “Effective Date”), is made and entered into by and between CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Tenant”), and CITY OF SCHERTZ (“Landlord”). RECITALS A.Landlord and Tenant (collectively, the “Parties” and each, individually, a “Party”) have entered into the following agreement: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC LEASE AGREEMENT dated August 5, 2021 (as it may have been amended, the “Lease”). B.Pursuant to the Lease, Tenant is leasing from Landlord certain real property described therein for the purpose of maintaining and operating outdoor advertising structures. C.The Parties desire to amend and modify certain terms of the Lease as provided herein. AGREEMENTS NOW THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereby agree as follows: 1.Except as otherwise defined herein, capitalized terms used in this Amendment shall have the meanings assigned to such terms in the Lease. 2.Tenant shall pay base rent (“Base Rent”) of three thousand five hundred dollars ($3,500.00) annually, payable in twelve (12) equal monthly installments on or before the first day of each month (prorated for any partial months). Base Rent will increase ten percent (10%) every 5 years of the term. In addition, within thirty (30) days following the one (1) year period after the Rent Commencement Date and each anniversary thereof during the Term, Tenant shall pay to Landlord the amount, if any, by which twenty percent (20%) of the annual net advertising revenue (defined as gross advertising revenue less any agency commission) indefeasibly received and recognized by Tenant for the Structures in respect of such one-year period exceeds the Base Rent paid to Landlord during such year (“Percentage Rent”). Such Percentage Rent payment shall be accompanied by a reasonably detailed statement of how such Percentage Rent was calculated. Landlord shall maintain such information as confidential and solely for revenue verification purposes. If, after Landlord’s inspection, Landlord believes that additional amount(s) are due, Landlord shall Landlord shall notify Tenant in writing within fifteen (15) business days of receipt of such statement, and Tenant shall deliver any such additional undisputed payment within fifteen (15) business days’ following such written notice. 3: The end of the effective term of the Lease is hereby extended to thirty (30) years from the effective date of this amendment. 3. Except as amended or modified hereby, all other terms of the Lease shall remain unaltered and in full force and effect. 4.This Amendment may be executed in one or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original but all of which when taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have executed this Amendment as of the Effective Date. CCO LLC/April 2019 2 TENANT: CLEAR CHANNEL OUTDOOR, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company By:_____________________________ Name: Ruben Batista Title: President/GM San Antonio Division LANDLORD: CITY OF SCHERTZ By:_____________________________ Name: Title: Agenda No. 6.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Police Department Subject: Resolution 26-R-067 - Authorizing the City Manager to reject all proposal submissions received for the FM 78 Police Station Remodel Project (J.Lowery/D.Roman) BACKGROUND Following a thorough internal review of the project's scope, timeline, and delivery requirements, the City has decided to cancel the current solicitation. The City intends to restructure the project and seek new proposals using a Design-Build delivery model. This approach will better integrate design and construction, streamline project management, and improve risk allocation. GOAL The goal of restructuring the project is to obtain competitive, fair, and fiscally responsible pricing that aligns more closely with the project budget, while ensuring the work can be completed by a qualified contractor in a manner that best serves the community’s needs. COMMUNITY BENEFIT After careful review, the City has determined that it is in the City's best interest to reject all proposals received for the project and proceed with re-bidding. Rejecting the proposal allows the City to ensure responsible stewardship of taxpayer funds and to review the project scope, schedule, and bidding documents to confirm they accurately reflect the intended work. Restructuring the project is expected to create a more competitive procurement process and may result in pricing that better aligns with the project’s budget and available resources. This action benefits the community by helping ensure that funds are used efficiently and transparently, preserving resources for this and other important community needs while still allowing the project to move forward in a financially responsible manner. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approve Resolution 26-R-067 to reject the current proposal submissions received for the FM 78 Police Station Remodel Project.  RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 26-R-067 to reject the current proposal submissions received for the FM 78 Police Station Remodel Project. Attachments Resolution 26-R-067 RESOLUTION 26-R-067 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO REJECT ALL SUBMISSIONS RECEIVED FOR THE FM 78 POLICE STATION REMODEL PROJECT WHEREAS, City staff has reviewed the proposals received, and determined that restructuring the project as a Design-Build model would better suit the City’s needs, streamline the project, and optimize risk allocation; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to reject all received proposals for the FM78 Police Station Architecture Design and Remodel and re-solicit the project as a Design-Build model NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1.The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to reject all proposals received for the FM 78 Police Station Remodel Project. Section 2.The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3.All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4.This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6.It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7.This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the _______ day of _______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson City Secretary Agenda No. 7.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Finance Subject:Resolution 26-R-072 - Authorizing a Notice of Intention to Issue Bonds (S. Gonzalez/J.Walters) BACKGROUND To align with the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the City needs to issue debt to finance essential improvement projects across the community. These bonds will fund necessary roadway development and expansion, generator replacements, and drainage improvements. Current recommended projects include:  Lower Seguin Road Improvements:                           $3,200,000 Annual Street Preservation & Maintenance (SPAM): $1,488,400 Northcliffe Country Club Estates Rehabilitation:        $1,701,600 Savannah Drive Mill and Overaly:                             $1,460,000 Generator for Community Center/Building 1:               $300,000 Generator for Public Safety Complex:                          $600,000 Wendy Swan Drainage Improvements:                     $1,100,000 The total bond sale is proposed to be $9,850,000, with $8,750,000 allocated for the General Fund and $1,100,000 for the Drainage Fund. To sell Certificates of Obligation Bonds (CO), the City Council must approve publishing a Notice of Intent in the official paper for two consecutive weeks. If no petition is received within 30 days of the notice, the City Council may review the bond sale on August 4, 2026. If a petition is received, the bond sale will be put to a vote in the next election instead of being sold. This resolution does not guarantee that the debt will be issued. The Council may modify the debt amounts or cancel the sale at any time before acceptance. This resolution solely serves to post notice of a potential debt issuance later this year as required by law when issuing certificates of obligation. GOAL To get approval to issue the notices advertising the potential sale of new debt by the City.   COMMUNITY BENEFIT These funds will enhance the quality of life in the city by alleviating traffic congestion, providing smoother driving surfaces, and improving the overall appearance and feel of Schertz. Additionally, these projects will improve drainage around Wendy Swan Memorial Park and provide reliable energy in emergency for City Buildings.   SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION To approve resolution 26-R-072 authorizing the publication of the notice of intent to issue certificates of obligation.   FISCAL IMPACT The proposed new debt payments will not cause an increase in the tax rate. This issuance will use the current funding levels, lower scheduled payments on CO 2019 and the CO 2024 bonds. General Fund: $675,900 Drainage:          $75,000 Total Debt Service: $750,900 Amounts listed are estimates only and subject to change by the sale date. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommends approval of Resolution 26-R-072 Attachments Resolution 26-R-072 Proposed Debt Payment Schedule Debt Issuance Timetable RESOLUTION NO: 26-R-072 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING PUBLICATION OF NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION; COMPLYING WITH THE REQUIREMENTS CONTAINED IN SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION RULE 15c2-12; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the City Council) of the City of Schertz, Texas (the City) has determined that it is advisable and necessary to issue and sell one or more series of certificates of obligation (the Certificates) in an amount not to exceed $9,850,000 as provided pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended, Texas Local Government Code, Section 271.041 through Section 271.064, for the purpose of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to-wit: (1) (a) constructing street improvements (including utilities repair, replacement, and relocation), curbs, gutters, and sidewalk improvements, including drainage and traffic safety signalization and signage incidental thereto; (b) for drainage improvements, including designing, engineering, and construction costs related thereto; (c) renovating, equipping, and improving public safety facilities, including replacing generators at the City’s public safety building; (d) renovating, equipping, and improving administrative office buildings housing the governmental functions of the City, including replacing generators at the City’s civic center and City hall building; (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned capital improvements; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, project management, and financing of the aforementioned projects. The Certificates will be payable from the levy of an annual ad valorem tax, within the limitations prescribed by law, upon all taxable property within the City and from a lien on and pledge of certain of the revenues derived from the operation of the City’s utility system. The Certificates are to be issued, and this notice is given, under and pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended, Texas Local Government Code Section 271.041 through Section 271.064, Chapter 1502, as amended, Texas Government Code, and the City’s Home Rule Charter; and WHEREAS, prior to the offering, sale, and issuance of the Certificates, the appropriate officials of the City must review and approve the distribution of a “deemed final” preliminary official statement (the Official Statement) in order to comply with the requirements contained in 17 C.F.R. §240.15c2-12 (the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule); and WHEREAS, based upon their review of the Official Statement, the appropriate officials of the City must find to the best of their knowledge and belief, after reasonable investigation, that the representations of facts pertaining to the City contained in the Official Statement are true and correct and that, except as disclosed in the Official Statement, there are no facts pertaining to the City that would adversely affect the issuance of the Certificates or the City’s ability to pay the debt service requirements on the Certificates when due; and WHEREAS, the City Council will comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule concerning the creation of a contractual obligation between the City and the proposed purchaser(s) of the Certificates (the Purchasers) to provide the Purchasers with an Official Statement in a time and manner that will enable the Purchasers to comply with the distribution requirements and continuing disclosure requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule; and WHEREAS, the City Council authorizes the Mayor, City Manager, Director of Finance, City Secretary, and the City Attorney, as appropriate, or their designees, to review, approve, and execute any document or certificate in order to allow the City to comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule; and WHEREAS, prior to the issuance of the Certificates, the City Council is required to publish notice of its intention to issue the Certificates in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, and if the City maintains an internet website, publish such notice of intent on the City’s internet website, such notice stating (i) the time and place the City Council tentatively proposes to pass the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates, (ii) the purposes for which the Certificates are to be issued, (iii) the manner in which the City Council proposes to pay the Certificates; (iv) the then-current principal amount of all outstanding ad valorem debt obligations of the City; (v) the then-current combined principal and interest required to pay all outstanding ad valorem debt obligations of the City on time and in full, which may be based on the City’s expectations relative to the interest due on any variable rate ad valorem debt obligations; (vi) the maximum principal amount of the Certificates to be authorized; (vii) the estimated combined principal and interest required to pay the certificates to be authorized on time and in full; (viii) the estimated interest rate for the Certificates to be authorized or that the maximum interest rate for the Certificates may not exceed the maximum legal interest rate; and (ix) the maximum maturity date of the Certificates to be authorized; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that such documents pertaining to the sale of the Certificates should be approved, and the City should proceed with the giving of notice of intention to issue the Certificates in the time, form, and manner provided by law; WHEREAS, the City Council hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the residents of the City; now, therefore, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1: The City Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to cause notice to be published of the City Council’s intention to issue the Certificates in an amount not to exceed $9,850,000 for the purpose of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to: (1) (a) constructing street improvements (including utilities repair, replacement, and relocation), curbs, gutters, and sidewalk improvements, including drainage and traffic safety signalization and signage incidental thereto; (b) for drainage improvements, including designing, engineering, and construction costs related thereto; (c) renovating, equipping, and improving public safety facilities, including replacing generators at the City’s public safety building; (d) renovating, equipping, and improving administrative office buildings housing the governmental functions of the City, including replacing generators at the City’s civic center and City hall building; (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned capital improvements; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, project management, and financing of the aforementioned projects. The Certificates will be payable from the levy of an annual ad valorem tax, within the limitations prescribed by law, upon all taxable property within the City and additionally from a pledge of and lien on certain revenues derived from the operation of the City’s utility system. The notice hereby approved and authorized to be published shall read substantially in the form and content of Exhibit A attached hereto, which notice is incorporated herein by reference as a part of this Resolution for all purposes. SECTION 2: The City Secretary shall cause the notice described in Section 1 to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, once a week for two consecutive weeks, the date of the first publication shall be at least forty-six (46) days prior to the date stated therein for passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates. Additionally, the City Secretary shall cause the notice described in Section 1 to be posted continuously on the City’s website for at least forty-five (45) days prior to the date stated therein for passage of the ordinance authorizing the issuance of the Certificates. SECTION 3: The Mayor, City Manager, Director of Finance, City Secretary, and the City Attorney, as appropriate, or their designees, are authorized to review and approve the Official Statement pertaining to the offering, sale, and issuance of the Certificates and to execute any document or certificate in order to comply with the requirements contained in the Securities and Exchange Commission Rule. SECTION 4: The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. SECTION 5: All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 6: This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 7: If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 8: It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. SECTION 9: This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after the date of its adoption, and it is so resolved. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank.] PASSED AND ADOPTED, this the _____ day of _______, 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ____________________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit A NOTICE OF INTENTION TO ISSUE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas will convene at its regular meeting place in the City Hall in Schertz, Texas, at 6:00 o’clock P.M., Schertz, Texas time on August 4, 2026, and, during such meeting, the City Council will consider the passage of an ordinance or ordinances and take such other actions as may be deemed necessary to authorize the issuance of one or more series of certificates of obligation in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $9,850,000 for the purpose or purposes of paying contractual obligations of the City to be incurred for making permanent public improvements and for other public purposes, to-wit: (1) (a) constructing street improvements (including utilities repair, replacement, and relocation), curbs, gutters, and sidewalk improvements, including drainage and traffic safety signalization and signage incidental thereto; (b) for drainage improvements, including designing, engineering, and construction costs related thereto; (c) renovating, equipping, and improving public safety facilities, including replacing generators at the City’s public safety building; (d) renovating, equipping, and improving administrative office buildings housing the governmental functions of the City, including replacing generators at the City’s civic center and City hall building; (2) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned capital improvements; and (3) the payment of professional services related to the design, construction, project management, and financing of the aforementioned projects. The certificates of obligation (the Certificates) will be payable from the levy of an annual ad valorem tax, within the limitations prescribed by law, upon all taxable property within the City and from a lien on and pledge of certain revenues derived by the City from the operation of the City’s utility system. In accordance with Section 271.049, as amended, Texas Local Government Code, (i) the current principal amount of all of the City’s outstanding public securities secured by and payable from ad valorem taxes is $148,090,000; (ii) the current combined principal and interest required to pay all of the City’s outstanding public securities secured by and payable from ad valorem taxes on time and in full is $207,243,254.84; (iii) the estimated combined principal and interest required to pay the Certificates to be authorized on time and in full is $14,889,325; (iv) the maximum interest rate for the Certificates may not exceed the maximum legal interest rate; and (v) the maximum maturity date of the Certificates to be authorized is February 1, 2050. The Certificates are to be issued, and this notice is given, under and pursuant to the provisions of the Certificate of Obligation Act of 1971, as amended, Texas Local Government Code Section 271.041 through Section 271.064, Chapter 1502, as amended, Texas Government Code, and the City’s Home Rule Charter. /s/ Sheila Edmondson City Secretary, City of Schertz, Texas Purpose 2026 2027 2028 2033 Totals Drainage 1,100,000$ -$ -$ -$ 1,100,000$ Parks - - - 2,000,000 2,000,000$ Streets 7,842,000 2,500,000 4,583,000 72,069,300 86,994,300 Facilities 900,000 3,350,000 5,300,000 54,000,000 63,550,000 Totals 9,842,000$ 8,530,000$ 6,342,000$ 132,456,600$ 157,170,600$ Plus: $9.85MM Series 2026 (3) Plus: $15MM Series 2027 (3)(4)Total Debt Service Less: Freeze to I&S (5) Less: Use of I&S Fund Balance 2026 5,734,815,455$ 11,541,013$ 0.2012 - 1,100,000$ 800,000$ 9,641,013$ 0.1681 2027 6,050,230,305 5.50% 10,519,393 0.1739 751,163$ 751,163$ 1,100,000 - 10,170,556 0.1681 2028 6,261,988,366 3.50% 10,364,690 0.1655 756,538 687,500$ 1,444,038 1,100,000 182,000 10,526,727 0.1681 2029 6,481,157,959 3.50% 10,024,578 0.1547 829,438 1,140,000 1,969,438 1,100,000 - 10,894,016 0.1681 2030 6,707,998,487 3.50% 10,023,919 0.1494 737,000 1,105,375 1,842,375 1,100,000 - 10,766,294 0.1605 2031 6,942,778,434 3.50% 10,134,950 0.1460 740,800 1,242,125 1,982,925 1,100,000 - 11,017,875 0.1587 2032 6,942,778,434 0.00% 8,975,281 0.1293 738,813 1,244,125 1,982,938 1,100,000 - 9,858,219 0.1420 2033 6,942,778,434 0.00% 8,508,650 0.1226 741,038 1,239,750 1,980,788 1,100,000 - 9,389,438 0.1352 2034 6,942,778,434 0.00% 7,915,181 0.1140 737,475 1,239,000 1,976,475 1,100,000 - 8,791,656 0.1266 2035 6,942,778,434 0.00% 7,922,519 0.1141 738,125 1,241,625 1,979,750 1,100,000 - 8,802,269 0.1268 2036 6,942,778,434 0.00% 7,931,603 0.1142 737,875 1,242,500 1,980,375 1,100,000 - 8,811,978 0.1269 2037 6,942,778,434 0.00% 6,914,266 0.0996 736,725 1,241,625 1,978,350 1,100,000 - 7,792,616 0.1122 2038 6,942,778,434 0.00% 6,275,625 0.0904 739,563 1,239,000 1,978,563 1,100,000 - 7,154,188 0.1030 2039 6,942,778,434 0.00% 5,982,113 0.0862 741,275 1,239,500 1,980,775 1,100,000 - 6,862,888 0.0988 2040 6,942,778,434 0.00% 5,787,269 0.0834 736,975 1,242,875 1,979,850 1,100,000 - 6,667,119 0.0960 2041 6,942,778,434 0.00% 5,790,906 0.0834 736,663 1,239,125 1,975,788 1,100,000 - 6,666,694 0.0960 2042 6,942,778,434 0.00% 5,794,800 0.0835 740,113 1,243,125 1,983,238 1,100,000 - 6,678,038 0.0962 2043 6,942,778,434 0.00% 3,557,350 0.0512 737,325 1,239,750 1,977,075 1,100,000 - 4,434,425 0.0639 2044 6,942,778,434 0.00%3,554,950 0.0512 738,300 1,243,875 1,982,175 1,100,000 - 4,437,125 0.0639 2045 6,942,778,434 0.00%2,296,000 0.0331 737,925 1,240,375 1,978,300 1,100,000 - 3,174,300 0.0457 2046 6,942,778,434 0.00%- 0.0000 736,200 1,239,250 1,975,450 1,100,000 - 875,450 0.0126 2047 6,942,778,434 0.00%- 0.0000 - 1,240,250 1,240,250 1,100,000 - 140,250 0.0020 149,815,055$ 14,889,325$ 24,030,750$ 38,920,075$ 982,000$ 163,553,130$ (1) 2026 Freeze Adjusted Values. Future growth estimated at 5.5% the next year, 3.5% growth for 4 years and 0% growth thereafter. (3) Calculated with an interest rate of 4.5% for illustrative purposes only. (4) Combines 2027 & 2028 CIP plans (5) Represents unnincumbered fund ammount for FYE 2025 and carried forward. Subject to change each year. Derived from City's TNT model. New NetTotal Debt Service I&S (2) Reflects the General Fund supported debt as reflected in the City's latest debt model. Schertz, City of Tax Rate Impact Analysis - Funding Strategy with Structured Debt Service and Maintaining Existing I&S Rate May 12, 2026 FYE 9/30 Freeze Adjusted TAV (1) Annual Growth Rate Existing Debt Service (2)I&S Rate Future Issuances $__________* CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS (the “CITY”) COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 2026 (the “OBLIGATIONS”) Tuesday, May 12, 2026 SAMCO Capital (“SAMCO”) briefs the City Council and city staff on the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. SAMCO receives approval to proceed. Tuesday, June 2, 2026 The City Council authorizes the Notice of Intention (“NOI”) Resolution to issue the Certificates and the Reimbursement Resolution Wednesday, June 3, 2026 City posts NOI to the City’s formal internet website (day after NOI meeting or at least 45 days prior to the Ordinance adoption) Monday, June 8, 2026 SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc. (“SAMCO”) sends the Request for Information (“RFI”) to the City Wednesday, June 10, 2026 First publication of the NOI (at least 46 days prior to the Ordinance adoption) Monday, June 15, 2026 The City returns the RFI to SAMCO Wednesday, June 17, 2026 Second publication of the NOI published to the City’s legal newspaper Monday, June 22, 2026 First draft the Preliminary Official Statement (“POS”) sent to Norton Rose Fulbright, US LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, for review and comments Monday, June 29, 2026 Comments on first draft of POS due Wednesday, July 1, 2026 Second draft of POS sent to the bond counsel, city officials, Underwriters, Underwriters Counsel and rating agency for review Week of July 13, 2026 Schedule conference calls with Rating Agency and due diligence call with the underwriters and their counsel Monday, July 27, 2026 Comments on second draft of POS due Tuesday, July 28, 2026 Post POS to SAMCO website and email link to distribution list Wednesday, July 29, 2026 Bond Rating due Tuesday, August 4, 2026  Pricing  City Council adopts the Ordinance authorizing the sale of the Obligations Wednesday, September 2, 2026 Obligations Closing; funds wired to the City’s depository bank __________________________ *Preliminary, subject to change. Holidays S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 12 123456 1234 1 12345 3456789 78910111213 567891011 2345678 6789101112 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12131415161718 9 101112131415 13141516171819 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23242526 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 June July August SeptemberMay Agenda No. 8.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Finance Subject: Resolution 26-R-073 - Establish the City's intention to reimburse itself for prior expenditures on improvements from upcoming tax-exempt obligations. (S.Gonzalez/J.Walters) BACKGROUND To align project start dates with funding from debt issuances, provisions in the Texas Government Code and the United States Department of Treasury Regulations permit the City to initiate projects before the debt is issued, allowing reimbursement for related expenses from the proceeds of that issuance. Following the amounts outlined in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), the City plans to issue approximately $9.85 million in debt to fund projects beginning in the fiscal year 2025-26. According to Texas Government Code 1201.042, the proceeds from the sale of obligations issued to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, or furnishing of any projects or facilities may be used to reimburse the Issuer for costs incurred for such projects or facilities prior to the date of obligation issuance. Projects scheduled to commence before the arrival of the new debt funds in early September include the Annual Streets Preservation and Maintenance (SPAM) program, the remaining funds for Lower Seguin Road improvements, Northcliffe Country Club Estates Road improvements, Savannah Drive improvements, replacement of the generator for the Community Center/Building1, replacement of the generator for the Public Safety Complex, and Wendy Swan drainage improvements.  If the council does not approve this resolution, any expenditures incurred on the aforementioned projects before the debt proceeds arrive would need to be funded from alternative sources, such as fund balance or operational budgets. Alternatively, staff may need to pause these projects until funds become available. This resolution allows the City to reimburse itself from the proceeds of debt issued later this year for projects that begin before the funds are received. It does not approve these projects or authorize the debt issuance. The council will need to take separate action to approve each project, if it has not done so already, and the debt issuance will be addressed separately from this resolution.   GOAL To receive authorization from Council to start projects now and reimburse the City from a future debt issuance later this year. COMMUNITY BENEFIT This resolution permits projects to start earlier in the year without adhering to the strict timelines of This resolution permits projects to start earlier in the year without adhering to the strict timelines of debt issuance, enabling quicker completion for the benefit of the community. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends council approve Resolution 26-R-073 allowing the City to reimburse itself from projects starting prior to the upcoming debt issuance. FISCAL IMPACT This resolution would enable the City to reimburse itself up to $9.85 million from the planned upcoming debt issuance for related expenditures. Given project timelines, it is unlikely that all $9.85 million will be utilized before the bonds are issued. Staff estimates that the actual amount needed could be up to $2 million; however, our Bond Council and legal team at Norton Rose Fulbright recommend using the higher figure based on identified project costs as a precaution. The General Fund and Drainage Fund could finance their portions of the estimated project expenditures using available cash while the debt funds are being raised. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution 26-R-073 Attachments Resolution 26-R-073 Reimbursement of Debt Funded Project Expenses Debt Issuance Timeline RESOLUTION NO: 26-R-073 A RESOLUTION RELATING TO ESTABLISHING THE CITY’S INTENTION TO REIMBURSE ITSELF FOR THE PRIOR LAWFUL EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS RELATING TO CONSTRUCTING VARIOUS CITY IMPROVEMENTS FROM THE PROCEEDS OF TAX-EXEMPT OBLIGATIONS TO BE ISSUED BY THE CITY FOR AUTHORIZED PURPOSES; AUTHORIZING OTHER MATTERS INCIDENT AND RELATED THERETO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the City Council (the Governing Body) of the City of Schertz, Texas (the Issuer) has entered into or will enter into various contracts pertaining to the expenditure of lawfully available funds of the Issuer to finance the costs associated with (i) (a) constructing street improvements (including utilities repair, replacement, and relocation), curbs, gutters, and sidewalk improvements, including drainage and traffic safety signalization and signage incidental thereto; (b) providing for drainage improvements, including designing, engineering, and construction costs related thereto; (c) renovating, equipping, and improving public safety facilities, including replacing generators at the City’s public safety building; (d) renovating, equipping, and improving administrative office buildings housing the governmental functions of the City, including replacing generators at the City’s civic center and City hall building; and (e) the purchase of materials, supplies, equipment, machinery, landscaping, land, and rights-of-way for authorized needs and purposes relating to the aforementioned capital improvements (the Construction Costs), (ii) the payment of various engineering costs, including design testing, design engineering, and construction inspection related to the Construction Costs (the Engineering Costs), (iv) the payment of various architectural costs, including preparation of plans and specifications and various other plans and drawings related to the Construction Costs (the Architectural Costs), and (v) the payment of various administrative costs, including the fees of bond counsel, financial advisor, project manager, project consultant, other professionals, and bond printer (the Administrative Costs) the Construction Costs, the Engineering Costs, the Architectural Costs, and Administrative Costs collectively constitute costs of the Issuer’s projects that are the subject of this Resolution (the Project); and WHEREAS, the provisions of Section 1201.042, as amended, Texas Government Code (Section 1201.042) provide that the proceeds from the sale of obligations issued to finance the acquisition, construction, equipping, or furnishing of any project or facilities, such as the Project, may be used to reimburse the Issuer for costs attributable to such project or facilities paid or incurred before the date of issuance of such obligations; and WHEREAS, the United States Department of Treasury (the Department) released Regulation Section 1.150-2 (the Regulations) which establishes when the proceeds of obligations are spent and therefore are no longer subject to various federal income tax restrictions contained in the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code); and WHEREAS, the Issuer intends to reimburse itself, within eighteen months from the later of the date of expenditure or the date the property financed is placed in service (but in no event more than three years after the original expenditures are paid), for the prior lawful capital expenditure of funds from the proceeds of one or more series of tax-exempt obligations (the 304077709.4 -2- 304077709.4 Obligations) that the Issuer currently contemplates issuing in the principal amount of not to exceed $9,850,000 to finance a portion of the costs of the Project; and WHEREAS, under the Regulations, to fund such reimbursement with proceeds of the Obligations, the Issuer must declare its expectation ultimately to make such reimbursement before making the expenditures; and WHEREAS, the Issuer hereby finds and determines that the reimbursement for the prior expenditure of funds of the Issuer is not inconsistent with the Issuer’s budgetary and financial circumstances; and WHEREAS, the Governing Body hereby finds and determines that the adoption of this Resolution is in the best interests of the residents of the Issuer; now, therefore, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: SECTION 1. This Resolution is a declaration of intent to establish the Issuer’s reasonable, official intent under section 1.150-2 of the Regulations and Section 1201.042 to reimburse itself from certain of the proceeds of the Obligations for any capital expenditures previously incurred (not more than 60 days prior to the date hereof) or to be incurred with respect to the Project from the Issuer’s General Fund or other lawfully available funds of the Issuer. SECTION 2. The Issuer intends to issue the Obligations and allocate within 30 days after the date of issuance of the Obligations the proceeds therefrom to reimburse the Issuer for prior lawful expenditures with respect to the Project in a manner to comply with the Regulations. SECTION 3. The reimbursed expenditure will be a type properly chargeable to a capital account (or would be so chargeable with a proper election) under general federal income tax principles. SECTION 4. The Issuer intends to otherwise comply, in addition to those matters addressed within this Resolution, with all the requirements contained in the Regulations. SECTION 5. This Resolution may be relied upon by the appropriate officials at the Office of the Attorney General for the State of Texas and establishes compliance by the Issuer with the requirements of Texas law and the Regulations. SECTION 6. With respect to the proceeds of the Obligations allocated to reimburse the Issuer for prior expenditures, the Issuer shall not employ an abusive device under Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-10, including using within one year of the reimbursement allocation, the funds corresponding to the proceeds of the Obligations in a manner that results in the creation of “replacement proceeds”, as defined in Treasury Regulation Section 1.148-1, of the Obligations or another issue of tax-exempt obligations. SECTION 7. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Governing Body. -3- 304077709.4 SECTION 8. All ordinances and resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. SECTION 9. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. SECTION 10. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the Governing Body hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. SECTION 11. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. SECTION 12. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. [The remainder of this page intentionally left blank] Signature page to the Reimbursement Resolution S-1 PASSED and ADOPTED on this the ________ of ______, 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary $__________* CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS (the “CITY”) COMBINATION TAX AND REVENUE CERTIFICATES OF OBLIGATION, SERIES 2026 (the “OBLIGATIONS”) Tuesday, May 12, 2026 SAMCO Capital (“SAMCO”) briefs the City Council and city staff on the issuance of the Certificates of Obligation. SAMCO receives approval to proceed. Tuesday, June 2, 2026 The City Council authorizes the Notice of Intention (“NOI”) Resolution to issue the Certificates and the Reimbursement Resolution Wednesday, June 3, 2026 City posts NOI to the City’s formal internet website (day after NOI meeting or at least 45 days prior to the Ordinance adoption) Monday, June 8, 2026 SAMCO Capital Markets, Inc. (“SAMCO”) sends the Request for Information (“RFI”) to the City Wednesday, June 10, 2026 First publication of the NOI (at least 46 days prior to the Ordinance adoption) Monday, June 15, 2026 The City returns the RFI to SAMCO Wednesday, June 17, 2026 Second publication of the NOI published to the City’s legal newspaper Monday, June 22, 2026 First draft the Preliminary Official Statement (“POS”) sent to Norton Rose Fulbright, US LLP, Bond Counsel to the City, for review and comments Monday, June 29, 2026 Comments on first draft of POS due Wednesday, July 1, 2026 Second draft of POS sent to the bond counsel, city officials, Underwriters, Underwriters Counsel and rating agency for review Week of July 13, 2026 Schedule conference calls with Rating Agency and due diligence call with the underwriters and their counsel Monday, July 27, 2026 Comments on second draft of POS due Tuesday, July 28, 2026 Post POS to SAMCO website and email link to distribution list Wednesday, July 29, 2026 Bond Rating due Tuesday, August 4, 2026  Pricing  City Council adopts the Ordinance authorizing the sale of the Obligations Wednesday, September 2, 2026 Obligations Closing; funds wired to the City’s depository bank __________________________ *Preliminary, subject to change. Holidays S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S S M T W T F S 12 123456 1234 1 12345 3456789 78910111213 567891011 2345678 6789101112 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 12131415161718 9 101112131415 13141516171819 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 20 21 22 23242526 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 27 28 29 30 31 30 31 June July August SeptemberMay Agenda No. 9.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 26-S-010 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB), generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB). The subject property is currently unplatted and undeveloped. The specific use permit request Ordinance 26-S-011 is accompanying this zone change application. On April 23, 2026, six (6) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of this report, zero (0) responses in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. A public hearing was held at the May 6, 2026, Planning and Zoning Commission. The meeting can be viewed on the City of Schertz "Youtube" page. A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026. The applicant placed two notification signs on the subject property. Subject Property:  Zoning Land Use Existing Pre-Development District (PRE)Undeveloped Proposed General Business District (GB)Commercial Development Adjacent Properties:  Zoning Land Use North Right-of-Way Ray Corbett Dr South Pre-Development District (PRE)Undeveloped East Pre-Development District (PRE)Undeveloped West Right-of-Way FM 1518 Zoning:  Table 21.5.7.B Dimensional Requirements for Non-Residential Zoning Districts Zoning District Code Area Sq.Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft.Rear Side Maximum Height Maximum Impervious Coverage Existing Pre-Development District PRE N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Proposed General Business District GB 10,000 100 100 25 adj. to non res: 0' adj. to res: 25' adj. to non res: 0' adj. to res: 25' 120 80 GOAL The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB) for a proposed commercial development. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, Staff refers to the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; The proposed zone change does meet the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map. The subject property is designated as Mixed-Use Center in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map. The Mixed-Use Center Future Land Use Designation is intended for a combination of higher-density housing, locally serving commercial, and recreational uses. Mixed-Use centers are typically located along significant transportation corridors. The subject property is located along FM 1518, which is identified as a principal arterial in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The proposed General Business District (GB) zoning allows for commercial and retail uses. The uses permitted within the General Business District (GB) meet the intent of the Mixed-Use Center Future Land Use Designation. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; As part of promoting the health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses, utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. All new development is required to meet the site design requirements listed under Article 9 of the Unified Development Code. During the Comprehensive Land Use Plan engagement process, there were multiple requests for services south of FM 78 that would serve the Southern portion of Schertz. The proposed zone change permits the subject property to be developed for uses that can serve the surrounding residential developments, thus promoting the general welfare of the City by permitting uses that meet community needs. As part of the zone change application, a Traffic Impact Analysis Summary was submitted and reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Engineering Department provided the following after reviewing the Traffic Impact Analysis Summary: "In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Drive, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City's transportation system functions at an acceptable level." The improvements noted by Engineering, that can be constructed to mitigate the traffic include the following:  widening Ray Corbett Dr for a full left turn lane; signalization of the intersection (FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr) when it meets signal warrants; increasing the length of the Southbound left turn lane that is part of the current FM 1518 project; and a right-turn/ deceleration lane on FM 1518. Please note that these are ways to mitigate the increase in traffic, but the required improvements for the specific development will not be known until later in the development process. Although the proposed zone change does allow for a zoning district that permits land uses that were requested during the Comprehensive Land Use Plan engagement process, the proposed zone change does adversely increase the traffic at the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive. However, the increase in traffic can be mitigated through improvements along Ray Corbett Dr and FM 1518, but the final required improvements are not known at this time. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; General Business District (GB) is intended to provide areas for development of non-residential uses that offer a wide variety of retail and service establishments that are generally oriented towards serving the needs of the entire community. The uses permitted include antique shops, retail, taverns, restaurants, and beauty shops/ barber shops. To the north of the property is Ray Corbett Dr, a residential collector. To the east and south of the subject property is the remainder of the 30-acre tract that is also zoned Pre-Development District. To the east of the larger tract is Ray Corbett Junior High School. To the west is FM 1518, a principal arterial. Across FM 1518, there are lots along the western portion of FM 1518 that are zoned General Business District (GB). The proposed zone change to General Business District (GB) would allow for uses that serve the needs of the entire community and can serve the residential developments south of FM 78. The uses permitted within General Business District (GB) are consistent and appropriate with the existing uses in the immediate area. 4. Whether other factors deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change application. The City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed zone change request and do not provide objections. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on May 6, 2026, for the proposed zone change. During the public hearing process, residents shared concerns about the proximity to the school and children inhaling fumes associated with Ordinance 26-S-011 for the SUP. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation: Although there are concerns with the traffic impact of the requested zone change, the proposed General Business District (GB) is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan- Future Land Use Map, and permits uses that serve the overall needs of the community. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 26-S-010. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of approval to the proposed zone change to City Council with a 5-2 vote. Commissioner Velazquez and Commissioner Hughes cast the nay votes. Attachments Ord. 26-S-010 With Attachments Aerial Exhibit 200-Foot Notification Map Engineering Traffic Memo City Council Presentation Slides ORDINANCE NO. 26-S-010 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 2.1 ACRES OF LAND FROM PRE-DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PRE) TO GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (GB), GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF FM 1518 AND RAY CORBETT DR, ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1103267, CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land from Pre- Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB), generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, more specifically described in the Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached herein (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zoning (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested zone change with a 5-2 vote; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property, as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B, approximately 2.1 acres of land is hereby zoned General Business District (GB). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as t o the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this ____day of ________ 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit “A” Property Description: Legal Metes and Bounds Scale Drawn by N/A Checked by Date Project No.Sheet No. San Antonio, Texas 78216 10101 Reunion Place, Suite 400 Tel. No. (210) 541-9166 www.kimley-horn.comFIRM # 10193973 APS 1/28/2026 065012201 1 OF 2 STENDAHL, ABEL 1/28/2026 3:49 PM K:\SMA_SURVEY\065012201-FOODIES SCHERTZ\DWG\EXHIBITS\FOODIES-SCHERTZ-2AC EXHIBIT.DWG JAJ SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL. MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 2.085 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING a 2.085 acre (90,814 square feet) tract of land situated in the Miles S. Bennett Survey No. 75, Abstract No. 61, County Block 5057, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas; being a portion of a called 40.067 acre tract of land described as Tract 2 in instrument to Croton Properties, LLC, recorded in Document No. 2008013987, Official Public Records, Bexar County, Texas; and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found marking the south end of a cut-back corner at the intersection of the northeast right-of-way line of FM 1518 (variable width) with the southeast right-of-way line of Ray Corbet Drive (variable width); THENCE, North 14°55'39" East, 53.55 feet along said cut-back corner to a 1/2" iron rod found marking the north end of said cut-back corner on the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive; THENCE, North 60°08'07" East, 222.00 feet along the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive to a point; THENCE, departing the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive and crossing said Tract 2, the following two (2) courses: 1.South 30°16'49” East, 351.12 feet to a point; 2.South 59°43'11" West, 260.00 feet to point on the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518; from which a bent 1/2-inch iron rod found marking a corner on the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518 bears South 30°16'49” East, 411.86 feet; THENCE, North 30°16'49" West, 315.00 feet along the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518 to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.085 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas. EXHIBIT OF A 2.085 ACRE TRACT MILES S. BENNET SURVEY NO. 75, ABSTRACT NO. 61 CITY OF SCHERTZ, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS Exhibit “B” Zoning Exhibit PR E GB DV L R- A PD D PR E E)0       1 R A <  & 2 R B E 7 7  D R GB PR E GB DV L R- A PD D PR E E)0       1 R A <  & 2 R B E 7 7  D R La s t u p d a t e : F e b r u a r y 1 7 , 2 0 2 6 Ci t y o f S c h e r t z , G I S S p e c i a l i s t : B i l l G a r d n e r , gi s @ s c h e r t z . c o m ( 2 1 0 ) 6 1 9 - 1 1 8 5 *T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z p r o v i d e s t h i s G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m p r o d u c t " a s i s " w i t h o u t a n y e x p r e s s o r i m p l i e d w a r r a n t y o f a n y k i n d i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t li m i t e d t o t h e i m p l i e d w a r r a n t i e s o f m e r c h a n t a b i l i t y a n d f i t n e s s f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p u r p o s e . I n n o e v e n t s h a l l T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z b e l i a b l e f o r a n y s p e c i a l , in d i r e c t , o r c o n s e q u e n t i a l d a m a g e s o r a n y d a m a g e s w h a t s o e v e r a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e u s e o f o r p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e s e m a t e r i a l s . In f o r m a t i o n p u b l i s h e d i n t h i s p r o d u c t c o u l d i n c l u d e t e c h n i c a l i n a c c u r a c i e s o r t y p o g r a p h i c a l e r r o r s . P e r i o d i c a l c h a n g e s m a y b e a d d e d t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n he r e i n . T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z m a y m a k e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d / o r c h a n g e s i n t h e p r o d u c t ( s ) d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n a t a n y t i m e . * FM 1 5 1 8 & R a y C o r b e t t D r (P L Z C 2 0 2 6 0 0 2 8 ) CU R R E N T (D V L ) D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t ( D e l a y e d A n n e x a t i o n ) (M - 2 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( H e a v y ) (M - 1 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( L i g h t ) (M S M U - N D ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e N e w D e v e l o p m e n t (M S M U ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e (O P ) O f f i c e a n d P r o f e s s i o n a l (N S ) N e i g h b o r h o o d S e r v i c e s (G B - 2 ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s I I (G B ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s (M H P ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e P a r k s (M H S ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e S u b d i v i s i o n (T H ) T o w n h o m e (G H ) G a r d e n H o m e / S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l ( Z e r o L o t L i n e ) (A D ) A g r i c u l t u r a l D i s t r i c t (R - 7 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 6 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 4 ) A p a r t m e n t / M u l t i - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 3 ) T w o - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 2 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 1 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - A ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l / A g r i c u l t u r a l (P U B ) P u b l i c U s e (P D D ) P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t (P R E ) P r e - D e v e l o p m e n t Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Zo n i n g C h a n g e PR O P O S E D q 0 10 0 20 0 30 0 40 0 50 Fe e t Zone Change FM 1518 & Ray Corbett Dr PLZC20260028 Planned Commercial Collector A Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector B Planned Residential Collector Residential Collector Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Freeway Minor Roads Major Roads Highways Project Boundary ETJ Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries Unknown 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" 1" Private Pressure Neighboring Gravity Schertz Pressure Schertz Gravity Sewer Main Schertz Treatment Plant3Q CCMA Treatment Plant3Q Schertz Lift Station[Ú Private Lift Station[Ú CCMA Lift Station[Ú Manholes!P HydrantU U U S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P!P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P Bexar County 10634 7 2 BARN S & BARN E S I N C 309923 PRICE CHRISTOPHER K EST OF 1146865 HOUY SHANNON NEIL & TINA MARIE 309894 IMPACT CHURCH SCHERTZ 309842 SCHNEIDER ALTON B & EILEEN 11330 7 4 SCHE R T Z C I B O L O UNIVE R S A L C I T Y I S D 1185753 WILLOW GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 309927 IMPACT CHURCH SCHERTZ 1133073 SCHERTZ CIBOLO UNIVERSAL CITY ISD 309850 WIDEMAN AMY CORINE309848 FRIESENHAHN MILTON & BILLIE, BASHA ELIZABETH ANN, ZWIEKE JEANNE MARIE, & MENK KATHERINE 309917 SCHERTZ 1518 LTD 1185875 FRED DEVELOPMENT LLC 1103267 CROTON PROPERTIES LLC 8" WL 4" WL 8" WL 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 30" WL 12" W L 1 2 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 2" WL 8" W L 1 2 " W L 10" W L 12" W L 1 2 " W L 8 " W L 8" W L 12" W L 8" W L 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 8" W L 6" WL 8 " W L 8" W L 12" W L 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 2" W L 8 " W L 3 " W L 6 " W L 8" P V C SD R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8"PVC SDR 26 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8"P V C SD R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"P V C SDR 3 5 8"PV C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"P V C SD R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PVC SDR 3 5 8"P V C SDR 3 5 RAY C O R B E T T D R A L S A T I A N W A Y LOWE R S E G U I N R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N /Q:(5U(*8,1  5 ' (  ) 0  3  3   1 &[3 5 ( U U %$5 1 $ / U $ 7 ,$ 1 : $ [ U + $ ' Q: ['8 U. .58 7 + 37 3 ( & $ 1  % 5 $ 1 & + Q % ( 5 1 $ , 3 $ 7 + %(1 , 1 * 9$// ( [ $5% Q 5 3$5 . /1 & Q / Q 1 ( /  5 ' * ./Q 1 ' , . ( &9 0 ( 7 = 9 $ / / ( [ 5 $ , 1 % Q : * / $ ' ( 5 (0 ,//[:$[ $ 8 5 Q 5 $ U . [ U 7 5 $ U % Q 8 5 * : $ [ 1Q57+ ( 5 1 U7$5 )Q5 % $ & + '5 %5Q Q . Q5& + $ 5 ' &/($ 5 :(// U 3 $ 5 . / ( 3 7 5$[  & Q 5 % ( 7 7  ' 5 & Q 7 7 Q 1 U 3 , 1 ' / ( %/Q U U Q 0  % / ) + , / / % 5 Q Q .  5 ' Microsoft, Vantor q 0 200 400 600100 Feet 10105 E FM 1518 N (309923) 10105 E FM 1518 N (1146865) RAY C O R B E T T D R (113 3 0 7 4 ) 10115 E FM 1518 N (309927) E FM 1518 N (309848) LOWER SEGUIN RD (1103267) E F M 1 5 1 8 N C O L O N E L R D G NORT H E R N S T A R ARB O R P A R K L N RAY C O R B E T T D R A U R O R A S K Y P V T R D A T 1 2 0 0 0 R A Y C O R B E T T D R Last update: February 13, 2026 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Bill Gardner, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1185 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* Zone Change FM 1518 & Ray Corbett Drive (PLZC20260028) City of Schertz Parcels 200' Buffer Project Boundary µ 0 250 500125 US Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Daisy Marquez, Senior Planner From: John Nowak, P.E., Engineer Date: April 22, 2026 Re: Traffic Impact Summary for Proposed Zone Change at the Southeast corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive This zone change request is for a portion of a 36.29 acre parcel at the Southeast corner of the FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive intersection. The zone change request is for a two acre portion, right at the intersection. The current zoning for this two-acre portion is PRE. If the two-acre parcel is developed to it’s full potential, the maximum peak hour trips it would generate is 4. The applicant is requesting the parcel be re-zoned to GB. The same parcel with GB zoning and developed to it’s full potential could generate a peak hour trip volume of 811 trips. This potential assumes development of the property to its maximum potential with the highest trip generation uses allowed in GB zoning. The applicant intends to develop the property with uses that would generate less than this amount of peak hour trips. The requested zone change would have an adverse impact to the FM 1518/Ray Corbett Drive intersection due to the increase in traffic. There are improvements that can be constructed to mitigate the effects of the additional traffic. Such improvements include, widening of Ray Corbett drive to provide for a full left turn lane; signalization of the intersection when it meets signal warrants; increasing the length of the southbound left turn lane that is part of the current FM 1518 project; and a right turn/decel lane if warranted. There is sufficient Right-of-Way available along Ray Corbett Drive to allow for the needed widening for the left turn lane. In an attempt to be pro-active and assuming the full 36.29 acre parcel will be developed in some fashion in the future, Staff has forwarded a copy of the traffic summary identifying the lengthening of the FM 1518 left turn lane to TXDOT for their consideration and incorporation into the FM 1518 project. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Should the zone change be approved, the proposed development will need to conduct a TIA as part of the development process. The TIA will be required to do a signal warrant analysis for the FM 1518/Ray Corbett intersection. If the intersection meets signal warrants due to the proposed development, then the developer will be required to work with TXDOT to signalize the intersection. Any other improvements identified in the TIA needed to mitigate the additional traffic generated by the development will also be required to be constructed by the development. In the long term, if the proposed development also had a connection/access point to Lower Seguin Road (the southern end of the 36.29 acre tract), it would help “split the traffic load” from this proposed development and future development between two signalized intersections (FM 1518/Lower Seguin and FM 1518/Ray Corbett). One of the requirements in the UDC is that cross access easement be provided during the platting process. The proposed development will be required to provide such an easement going towards Lower Seguin Road. Future development will be required to connect to and extend the easement to make a connection to Lower Seguin Road. In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Drive, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City’s transportation system functions at an acceptable level. Ord. 26-S-010 Proposed 2.1 ac Zone Change to GB Daisy Marquez| Senior Planner 2 Zoning Use Subject Property Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped North Right of Way Ray Corbett Dr (residential collector) South Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped/ Remainder of the tract East Pre-Development District (PRE) & Public Use District (PUB) Ray Corbett Junior High School West Right-of-Way FM 1518 (principal arterial) •2.1 acres •Current Zoning: PRE •Proposed: GB, Commercial Development •Accompanied by Ord. 26-S-011 3 Dimensional Requirements 21.5.7 Permitted Uses 21.5.8 Existing Proposed Pre-Development District (PRE)General Business District (GB) Permitted Uses *Not a Comprehensive List Municipal Uses; Church/ Place of Worship (SUP); Schools Appliances, Furniture and Home Furnishing Store; Building Material and Hardware Sales; Car Wash, Automated ; Commercial Amusement, Indoor Area Square Feet N/A 10,000 Width & Depth N/A 100x100 Setbacks, Adj. Non-Residential N/A Front: 20’, Side: NA, Rear: NA Maximum Height N/A 120’ Maximum Impervious Coverage N/A 80% 4 •6 Public notices were sent on 04.23.2026 •As of today •(0) in Favor •(0) Neutral to •(0) in Opposition •A public hearing was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026 •Two notification signs were placed by the applicant •May 6, 2026, P&Z Public Hearing 5 6 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Mixed-Use Center: •Combination of higher-density housing; •Locally serving commercial; and •Recreational uses •Located along major transportation corridors •Proposed GB: •Meets the intent of the Mixed-Use Future Land Use Designation 7 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •The proposed zone change to GB: •permits for land uses that were requested during the Comp. Plan Amendment Engagement Process, and •Promotes the general welfare of the community by permitting uses that meet the requested needs and residential developments south of FM 78 •does adversely increase the traffic at the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr. •Does not promote safety, •However, the increase in traffic can be mitigated through improvements, along Ray Corbett Dr and FM 1518, but the final required improvements are not known at this time. 8 2. CONTINUED UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Engineering Memo- TIA Summary •“In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Drive, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City's transportation system functions at an acceptable level” •Improvements that can be constructed to mitigate the traffic: •Widening Ray Corbett Dr for a full left turn lane •Signalization of the intersection (FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr) when it meets signal warrants •Increasing the length of the Southbound left turn lane that is part of the current FM 1518 project •Right-turn/ deceleration lane on FM 1518 •Final Required improvements not known at this time. 9 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •General Business District: •Purpose and Intent (21.5.6): •Retail and service establishments •Serve the overall needs of the entire community •Principal Transportation Corridors •Uses Permitted (UDC Section 21.5.8): •Antique shops, retail, convenience stores, beauty/ barber shops, etc. •*This is not an extensive list* •Consistent and appropriate with existing uses. 10 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change. •Schertz EMS, FIRE, and PD were notified of the proposed zone change and did not provide objections. •P&Z May 6, 2026 Public Hearing: •Resident concerns with the proximity to the school and children inhaling fumes based on associated SUP Ord. 26-S-011 11 Staff Recommendation: Although there are concerns with the traffic impact of the requested zone change, the proposed General Business District (GB) is consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan- Future Land Use Map, and permits uses that serve the overall needs of the community. Staff Recommends approval of Ord. 26-S-010. P&Z Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 5-2 vote. Commissioner Velazquez and Commissioner Hughes cast the nay votes without discussion. Agenda No. 10.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 26-S-011 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.1 acres of land, generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.1 acres of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr. The subject property is currently unplatted and undeveloped. The property is currently zoned Pre-Development District (PRE). This specific use permit application is accompanied by a zone change request to the General Business District (GB), known as Ord.26-S-010. As per UDC Section 21.5.8, a Specific Use Permit is required to permit a convenience store with gas pumps in General Business District (GB). On April 23, 2026, six (6) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of the staff report, zero (0) responses in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026. The meeting can be watched on the City of Schertz "Youtube" page. A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026. The applicant placed two notification signs on the subject property. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing  Pre-Development District (PRE)Undeveloped Proposed  General Business District (GB) with a Specific Use Permit (SUP) Convenience Store with Gas Pumps Adjacent Properties:   Zoning Land Use North  Right-of-Way  Ray Corbett Dr. South  Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped East  Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped West  Right-of-Way  FM 1518 GOAL The applicant is requesting a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.1 acres of land located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating Specific Use Permits, staff references UDC Section 21.5.11.D. for the criteria of approval. The criteria are listed below: 1. The proposed use at the specified location is consistent with the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. The subject property is designated as Mixed-Use Center in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map. The Mixed-Use Center Future Land Use Designation is intended for a combination of higher-density housing, locally serving commercial and recreational uses. Mixed-Use centers are typically located along significant transportation corridors. The subject property is located along FM 1518, a principal arterial and transportation corridor. The proposed Specific Use Permit does not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map Land Use Designation. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the applicable zoning district regulations; Pre-Development District (PRE) was intended as a zoning placeholder after the annexation of property into city limits. The subject property is also requesting a zone change to General Business District (GB). General Business District (GB) is intended to provide suitable areas for the development of non-residential uses that may include retail and service establishments that are generally oriented toward serving the overall needs of the community and are usually located along principal transportation corridors. The proposed Specific Use Permit is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the General Business District (GB). 3. The proposed use is compatible with and preserves the character and integrity of adjacent developments and neighborhoods. The City of Schertz does not have ordinances in place that restrict the distance of a convenience store with gas pumps from a school. Additionally, the City of Schertz has not adopted an ordinance that requires a certain distance of separation for alcohol sales and schools. The proposed General Business District (GB) zoning is compatible with the existing zoning in the area and uses in the area. The Specific Use Permit is required due to the proposed gas pumps for a gas station. A convenience store without gas pumps is permitted by right in General Business District (GB). 4. The proposed use will not adversely affect the overall health, safety or general welfare of the City; As part of promoting health, safety and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. The proposed Specific Use Permit is only proposed to be within 2.1 acres of the larger 30 acre tract. The remainder of the tract is zoned Pre-Development District (PRE). No zone change applications or development plans are currently being processed for the remainder of the tract. To the north of the subject property is Ray Corbett Dr, a residential collector. To the east, is the remainder of the tract zoned Pre-Development District (PRE) and Ray Corbett Junior High. To the west of the subject property is FM 1518. Although not immediately adjacent to Ray Corbett Junior High, the location of the proposed convenience store with gas pumps is in proximity to a Junior High. Additionally, the proposed location is at the intersection of a principal arterial and residential collector. If the proposed zone change and specific use permit are approved, access points to the site will be evaluated. Since the subject property is located along FM 1518, a TxDOT no objection letter will be required for any proposed plat and site plan. All access points along FM 1518 will need to be permitted and approved by TxDOT. As part of the Zone Change and Specific Use Permit application, a Traffic Impact Summary was prepared, which was reviewed by the Engineering Department. The Engineering Department provided the following after reviewing  the Traffic Impact Analysis Summary: "In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Dr, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City's transportation system functions at an acceptable level." The improvements noted by Engineering, that can be constructed to mitigate the traffic included the following:  widening Ray Corbett Dr for a full turn lane; signalization of the intersection (FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr) when it meets signal warrants; increasing the length of the southbound left turn lane that is part of the current FM 1518 project; and a right turn/ deceleration lane on FM 1518. Please note that these are ways to mitigate the increase in traffic, but the required improvements for the specific development will not be known until later in the development process. The full TIA report and required traffic mitigation will be reviewed at the time of the site plan. The increase in traffic will affect the safety of the intersection at FM 1518 and Ray Corbett, but traffic mitigation efforts will be required during the development process. Although the location of the proposed Specific Use Permit is not ideal, at the corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, it is not surrounded and adjacent to residential uses and zoning, and there is a buffer from the proposed location of the convenience store with gas pumps and the Junior High. 5. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the Specific Use Permit. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the Specific Use Permit. The City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed Specific Use Permit request and do not provide objections. The Police Department evaluated the calls for service for a convenience store with gas pumps in proximity to schools and did not find a correlation between the two. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the proposed Specific Use Permit. During the public hearing, residents expressed concerns over the location in proximity to the schools and residences, pedestrian travel and safety, traffic safety in relation to delivery trucks, delivery times for fuel and merchandise, and Traffic Impact Analysis concerns. Additional Considerations: The Environmental Protection Agency released a report in 2015, "Best Practices for Reducing Near-Road Pollution Exposure at Schools." The report references school siting guidelines that Near-Road Pollution Exposure at Schools." The report references school siting guidelines that recommend considering the locations for new schools by including the proximity to the community, distance from major transportation facilities, exposure to air pollutants during student commutes, feasible mitigation on site, and accessibility by walking or biking. There is no specific guidance on convenience stores with gas pumps in proximity to schools. Across the city, there are schools within proximity to convenience stores with gas pumps. Samuel Clemens High School is across the street from a convenience store with gas pumps located on the southwest corner of the intersection of Schertz Parkway and Aero Ave. Comal Creek Elementary School is approximately 250 feet away from a convenience store with gas pumps located on the northwest corner of the intersection of Hubertus Road and IH-35 N Access Road. The School of Science and Technology, which is located on IH -35 N  Access Road and Fairlawn Ave, is located down the road from a convenience store with gas pumps located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Hubertus Road and IH-35. The convenience stores with gas pumps, in these cases, are taking advantage of the intersection of major transportation corridors. Ideally, schools are located within residential neighborhoods where a convenience store with gas pumps would not be seen as an appropriate location due to the location within a residential neighborhood. The proposed Specific Use Permit request is for a convenience store with gas pumps located on the southeast corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr., in proximity to a school, but not adjacent to or within residential uses or zoning. Although the chosen southeast corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive is not ideal, and the corners of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Road would be preferred for a proposed convenience store with gas pumps, the proposed Specific Use Permit location does not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Plan, is not incompatible with the surrounding area, and traffic impacts can be mitigated. Previous Specific Use Permit requests to permit convenience stores with gas pumps received opposition due to the proximity of the proposed gas pumps to residential developments. For this Specific Use Permit request, the proposed 2.1 acres is not immediately adjacent to residential uses or zoning. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation: The proposed Specific Use Permit to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps, does not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, it is compatible with the existing uses and existing zoning, and it is not immediately adjacent to residential developments or zoning. Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 26-S-011 with the condition that a building permit is approved within two (2) years of the adoption of the SUP Ordinance in accordance with UDC Article 5, Section 21.5.11.F.  Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of denial to City Council with a 5-2 vote. Commissioner Outlaw and Commissioner McMaster cast the nay votes. Attachments Ordinance 26-S-011 With Attachments Aerial Exhibit 200-Foot Notification Map Engineering Memo on Traffic Impact City Council Presentation Slides Applicant's Presentation Slides Applicant's Presentation Slides ORDINANCE NO. 26-S-011 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, TO APPROVE A SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR A CONVENIENCE STORE WITH GAS PUMPS ON APPROXIMATELY 2.1 ACRES OF LAND, GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF FM 1518 AND RAY CORBETT DR, ALSO KNOWN AS A PORTION OF BEXAR COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 1103267, CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.1 acres of land, generally located at the southeast corner of the intersection of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr, also known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, more specifically described in the Exhibit A attached (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.11.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested Specific Use Permit (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to deny the requested Specific Use Permit for a convenience store with gas pumps with a 5-2 vote; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested Specific Use Permit be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. A Specific Use Permit for 2.1 acres of land, known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 1103267, more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, is hereby approved to allow a convenience store with gas pumps, conditioned upon the following occurring: a) A building permit is approved within two (2) years of the adoption of the SUP Ordinance in accordance with Unified Development Code Article 5, Section 21.5.11.F Expiration of Specific Use Permit. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the mat ters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this ____day of ________ 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit “A” Property Description: Legal Metes and Bounds Scale Drawn by N/A Checked by Date Project No.Sheet No. San Antonio, Texas 78216 10101 Reunion Place, Suite 400 Tel. No. (210) 541-9166 www.kimley-horn.comFIRM # 10193973 APS 1/28/2026 065012201 1 OF 2 STENDAHL, ABEL 1/28/2026 3:49 PM K:\SMA_SURVEY\065012201-FOODIES SCHERTZ\DWG\EXHIBITS\FOODIES-SCHERTZ-2AC EXHIBIT.DWG JAJ SEE SHEET 2 OF 2 FOR SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND SEAL. MEETS AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION OF A 2.085 ACRE TRACT OF LAND BEING a 2.085 acre (90,814 square feet) tract of land situated in the Miles S. Bennett Survey No. 75, Abstract No. 61, County Block 5057, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas; being a portion of a called 40.067 acre tract of land described as Tract 2 in instrument to Croton Properties, LLC, recorded in Document No. 2008013987, Official Public Records, Bexar County, Texas; and being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at a 1/2" iron rod found marking the south end of a cut-back corner at the intersection of the northeast right-of-way line of FM 1518 (variable width) with the southeast right-of-way line of Ray Corbet Drive (variable width); THENCE, North 14°55'39" East, 53.55 feet along said cut-back corner to a 1/2" iron rod found marking the north end of said cut-back corner on the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive; THENCE, North 60°08'07" East, 222.00 feet along the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive to a point; THENCE, departing the southeast right-of-way line of said Ray Corbett Drive and crossing said Tract 2, the following two (2) courses: 1.South 30°16'49” East, 351.12 feet to a point; 2.South 59°43'11" West, 260.00 feet to point on the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518; from which a bent 1/2-inch iron rod found marking a corner on the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518 bears South 30°16'49” East, 411.86 feet; THENCE, North 30°16'49" West, 315.00 feet along the northeast right-of-way line of said F.M. 1518 to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 2.085 acres of land in Bexar County, Texas. EXHIBIT OF A 2.085 ACRE TRACT MILES S. BENNET SURVEY NO. 75, ABSTRACT NO. 61 CITY OF SCHERTZ, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS SUP-FM 1518 & Ray Corbett Dr PLSPU20260030 Planned Commercial Collector A Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector B Planned Residential Collector Residential Collector Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Freeway Minor Roads Major Roads Highways Project Boundary ETJ Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries Unknown 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" 1" Private Pressure Neighboring Gravity Schertz Pressure Schertz Gravity Sewer Main Schertz Treatment Plant3Q CCMA Treatment Plant3Q Schertz Lift Station[Ú Private Lift Station[Ú CCMA Lift Station[Ú Manholes!P HydrantU U U S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S SS S S S S S S S S S S S !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P!P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P Bexar County 10634 7 2 BARN S & BARN E S I N C 309923 PRICE CHRISTOPHER K EST OF 1146865 HOUY SHANNON NEIL & TINA MARIE 309894 IMPACT CHURCH SCHERTZ 309842 SCHNEIDER ALTON B & EILEEN 11330 7 4 SCHE R T Z C I B O L O UNIVE R S A L C I T Y I S D 1185753 WILLOW GROVE HOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 309927 IMPACT CHURCH SCHERTZ 1133073 SCHERTZ CIBOLO UNIVERSAL CITY ISD 309850 WIDEMAN AMY CORINE309848 FRIESENHAHN MILTON & BILLIE, BASHA ELIZABETH ANN, ZWIEKE JEANNE MARIE, & MENK KATHERINE 309917 SCHERTZ 1518 LTD 1185875 FRED DEVELOPMENT LLC 1103267 CROTON PROPERTIES LLC 8" WL 4" WL 8" WL 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 30" WL 12" W L 1 2 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 2" WL 8" W L 1 2 " W L 10" W L 12" W L 1 2 " W L 8 " W L 8" W L 12" W L 8" W L 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 8" W L 6" WL 8 " W L 8" W L 12" W L 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 2" W L 8 " W L 3 " W L 6 " W L 8" P V C SD R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8"PVC SDR 26 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8"P V C SD R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"P V C SDR 3 5 8"PV C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"P V C SD R 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8" P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PV C SDR 2 6 8"PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PVC SDR 3 5 8"P V C SDR 3 5 RAY C O R B E T T D R A L S A T I A N W A Y LOWE R S E G U I N R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N /Q:(5U(*8,1  5 ' (  ) 0  3  3   1 &[3 5 ( U U %$5 1 $ / U $ 7 ,$ 1 : $ [ U + $ ' Q: ['8 U. .58 7 + 37 3 ( & $ 1  % 5 $ 1 & + Q % ( 5 1 $ , 3 $ 7 + %(1 , 1 * 9$// ( [ $5% Q 5 3$5 . /1 & Q / Q 1 ( /  5 ' * ./Q 1 ' , . ( &9 0 ( 7 = 9 $ / / ( [ 5 $ , 1 % Q : * / $ ' ( 5 (0 ,//[:$[ $ 8 5 Q 5 $ U . [ U 7 5 $ U % Q 8 5 * : $ [ 1Q57+ ( 5 1 U7$5 )Q5 % $ & + '5 %5Q Q . Q5& + $ 5 ' &/($ 5 :(// U 3 $ 5 . / ( 3 7 5$[  & Q 5 % ( 7 7  ' 5 & Q 7 7 Q 1 U 3 , 1 ' / ( %/Q U U Q 0  % / ) + , / / % 5 Q Q .  5 ' Microsoft, Vantor q 0 200 400 600100 Feet 10105 E FM 1518 N (309923) 10105 E FM 1518 N (1146865) RAY C O R B E T T D R (113 3 0 7 4 ) 10115 E FM 1518 N (309927) E FM 1518 N (309848) LOWER SEGUIN RD (1103267) E F M 1 5 1 8 N C O L O N E L R D G NORT H E R N S T A R ARB O R P A R K L N RAY C O R B E T T D R A U R O R A S K Y P V T R D A T 1 2 0 0 0 R A Y C O R B E T T D R Last update: February 13, 2026 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Bill Gardner, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1185 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* SUP FM 1518 & Ray Corbett Drive (PLSPU20260030) City of Schertz Parcels 200' Buffer Project Boundary µ 0 250 500125 US Feet DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Daisy Marquez, Senior Planner From: John Nowak, P.E., Engineer Date: April 22, 2026 Re: Traffic Impact Summary for Proposed Zone Change at the Southeast corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive This zone change request is for a portion of a 36.29 acre parcel at the Southeast corner of the FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Drive intersection. The zone change request is for a two acre portion, right at the intersection. The current zoning for this two-acre portion is PRE. If the two-acre parcel is developed to it’s full potential, the maximum peak hour trips it would generate is 4. The applicant is requesting the parcel be re-zoned to GB. The same parcel with GB zoning and developed to it’s full potential could generate a peak hour trip volume of 811 trips. This potential assumes development of the property to its maximum potential with the highest trip generation uses allowed in GB zoning. The applicant intends to develop the property with uses that would generate less than this amount of peak hour trips. The requested zone change would have an adverse impact to the FM 1518/Ray Corbett Drive intersection due to the increase in traffic. There are improvements that can be constructed to mitigate the effects of the additional traffic. Such improvements include, widening of Ray Corbett drive to provide for a full left turn lane; signalization of the intersection when it meets signal warrants; increasing the length of the southbound left turn lane that is part of the current FM 1518 project; and a right turn/decel lane if warranted. There is sufficient Right-of-Way available along Ray Corbett Drive to allow for the needed widening for the left turn lane. In an attempt to be pro-active and assuming the full 36.29 acre parcel will be developed in some fashion in the future, Staff has forwarded a copy of the traffic summary identifying the lengthening of the FM 1518 left turn lane to TXDOT for their consideration and incorporation into the FM 1518 project. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Should the zone change be approved, the proposed development will need to conduct a TIA as part of the development process. The TIA will be required to do a signal warrant analysis for the FM 1518/Ray Corbett intersection. If the intersection meets signal warrants due to the proposed development, then the developer will be required to work with TXDOT to signalize the intersection. Any other improvements identified in the TIA needed to mitigate the additional traffic generated by the development will also be required to be constructed by the development. In the long term, if the proposed development also had a connection/access point to Lower Seguin Road (the southern end of the 36.29 acre tract), it would help “split the traffic load” from this proposed development and future development between two signalized intersections (FM 1518/Lower Seguin and FM 1518/Ray Corbett). One of the requirements in the UDC is that cross access easement be provided during the platting process. The proposed development will be required to provide such an easement going towards Lower Seguin Road. Future development will be required to connect to and extend the easement to make a connection to Lower Seguin Road. In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Drive, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City’s transportation system functions at an acceptable level. Ord. 26-S-011 Proposed SUP to allow Convenience Store with Gas Pumps 2.1 ac Daisy Marquez| Senior Planner 13 Zoning Use Subject Property Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped North Right of Way Ray Corbett Dr (residential collector) South Pre-Development District (PRE) Undeveloped/ Remainder of the tract East Pre-Development District (PRE) & Public Use District (PUB) Ray Corbett Junior High School West Right-of-Way FM 1518 •2.1 acres •Current Zoning: PRE •Proposed Zoning: GB, Commercial Development •Accompanied by Ord. 26-S-010 14 Dimensional Requirements 21.5.7 Permitted Uses 21.5.8 Existing Proposed Pre-Development District (PRE)General Business District (GB) Permitted Uses *Not a Comprehensive List Municipal Uses; Church/ Place of Worship (SUP); Schools Appliances, Furniture and Home Furnishing Store; Building Material and Hardware Sales; Car Wash, Automated ; Commercial Amusement, Indoor Area Square Feet N/A 10,000 Width & Depth N/A 100x100 Setbacks, Adj. Non-Residential N/A Front: 20’, Side: NA, Rear: NA Maximum Height N/A 120’ Maximum Impervious Coverage N/A 80% 15 •6 Public notices were sent on 04.23.2026 •As of today •(0) in Favor •(0) Neutral to •(0) in Opposition •A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026 •Two notification signs were placed by the applicant •May 6, 2026 P&Z 16 Background •Per UDC Section 21.5.8, A convenience store with gas pumps requires an approved Specific Use Permit in General Business District (GB). • This application is accompanied by the zone change application Ord. 26-S-010. 17 1. The proposed use at the specified location is consistent with the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval •Mixed-Use Center: •Combination of higher-density housing; •Locally serving commercial; and •Recreational uses •Located along major transportation corridors •Proposed SUP •FM 1518- Principal Arterial •Does not violate the intent of the Mixed-Use Future Land Use Designation 18 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the applicable zoning district regulations; UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval •Current Zoning: Pre-Development District (PRE) •Placeholder for properties after annexation •Proposed: General Business District (GB) •Intended for retail and service uses •Serve overall needs of the community •Located along principal transportation corridors •The proposed SUP: •Meets the intent of General Business District (GB) 19 3. The proposed use is compatible with and preserves the character and integrity of adjacent developments and neighborhoods. UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval •No ordinances adopted by Schertz: • to restrict the distance of a convenience store with gas pumps from a school. •that require a certain distance of separation for alcohol sales and schools. •A convenience store is permitted in GB. •The required Specific Use Permit is for the gas pumps associated with the convenience store. •Proposed GB zoning is compatible with existing zoning and uses in the area. 20 4. The proposed use will not adversely affect the overall health, safety or general welfare of the City; UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval •For 2.1 acres of a larger, approximately 30-acre tract •No current applications for the remainder of the tract •Intersection •FM 1518- Principal Arterial, TxDOT road •Ray Corbett Dr- Residential Collector •Access Points: •evaluated later in the development process •In proximity to Ray D. Corbett Junior High School, but not adjacent to it 21 4. CONTINUED UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval Engineering TIA Memo: “In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on Ray Corbett Drive, but the increase in traffic can be mitigated so the City's transportation system functions at an acceptable level ” •Mitigation through improvements: •Widening of Ray Corbett Dr for full turn lane •Signalization of intersection (if warranted) •Increase length of southbound left turn lane on FM 1518 •Right turn lane/ deceleration lane on FM 1518 •Required mitigation not known until later in the development process The proposed SUP location is not ideal, and traffic will be adversely affected on Ray Corbett, but it is not adjacent or surrounded by residential uses/ zoning, and traffic mitigation efforts will be required. 22 5. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the Specific Use Permit. UDC SECTION 21.5.11.D Criteria for Approval •Proposed SUP meets the UDC requirements. •Schertz EMS, Fire, and PD have reviewed the proposed SUP and did not provide objections. •PD evaluated the number of calls for service for a convenience store with gas pumps in proximity to schools and did not find a correlation between the two. •P&Z Public Hearing on May 6, 2026 •Resident Concerns with: •Location in proximity to schools and residences •Pedestrian travel •Traffic Safety Concerns with Delivery Trucks •Delivery Times for Fuel and Merchandise •TIA Concerns 23 Additional Considerations: •Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) • Best Practices for Reducing Near-Road Pollution Exposure at Schools (2015). •School siting guidelines for new schools •Considerations of proximity to community; •distance from major transportation facilities; •exposure to air pollutants during student commutes; •Feasible mitigation on site; and •Accessibility by walking or biking •No specific guidance on the proximity to convenience stores with gas pumps. 24 Additional Considerations: •Current Schools in Proximity to Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps •Samuel Clemens High School •Schertz Parkway- Principal Arterial •Elbel Road- Commercial Collector 25 Additional Considerations: •Current Schools in Proximity to Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps •Comal Creek Elementary School •Danville Middle School •Hubertus Rd- Principal Arterial •IH-35 Access Rd- Principal Arterial 26 Additional Considerations: •Current Schools in Proximity to Convenience Stores with Gas Pumps •School of Science and Technology •FM 1103- Principal Arterial •IH-35 Access Road- Principal Arterial The convenience stores with gas pumps at these locations are taking advantage of the intersections of major transportation corridors. 27 Additional Considerations: •Ideally, schools are located within residential developments •Ex. Schertz Elementary School, Laura Ingels Wilder Intermediate School •A convenience store with gas pumps would not be appropriate within a residential development and adjacent to a school Savannah SquareCarolina Crossing Ashley Place 28 Additional Considerations: •Proposed SUP location: •Corner of FM 1518 and Ray Corbett Dr •FM 1518- Principal Arterial •Ray Corbett Dr- Residential Collector •Not ideal, preferred location would be the intersection of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Rd •Lower Seguin Road- Secondary Arterial 29 Additional Considerations: •Previous SUP applications for a convenience store with gas pumps •Immediately adjacent to residential •Major opposition from surrounding property owners •Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concerns over proximity to residential uses and zoning •Proposed SUP is not immediately adjacent to resident uses or zoning 30 The proposed Specific Use Permit to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps, does not violate the intent of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, it is compatible with the existing uses and existing and proposed zoning, and it is not immediately adjacent to residential developments or zoning. Staff recommends approval of Ord. 26-S-011 with the condition a building permit is approved within 2 years of adoption of the SUP in accordance with UDC Article 5, Section 21.5.11.F. Staff Recommendation: P&Z Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for this item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of denial to City Council with a 5-2 vote. Commissioner Outlaw and Commissioner McMaster casted the nay votes. Proposed Community-Focused Convenience Store Schertz, TX Our Story §Family-owned & operated §25+ years of serving our first community location §Focus on quality & consistency §Committed to being a responsible, long- term community partner Cedar Park Leander Jonestown Liberty Hill San Marcos South Austin Austin East Austin Leander Cedar Park Jonestown Liberty Hill San Marcos Austin East Austin South Austin Communities Served Proposed Development Overview § Modern convenience store + fuel station § Designed for efficient traffic flow with safe access § Clean, well-lit professionally maintained site § Serves daily community convenience needs § Built to exceed local zoning and safety standards Site Layout Considerations §Fuel pump proximity: ~ 500 ft from the nearest single-family residence ~ 750 ft from the closest master-planned neighborhood ~ 1,000 ft from the nearest school building structure §24/7 security camera coverage §Well-lit exterior lighting for visibility §Thoughtfully designed for smooth entry and exit §ADA-compliant access & pathways §City compliance with TIA recommendation Site Safety §Double-Walled steel underground fuel tanks §Flexible fuel piping systems §Fuel vent lines will be routed through the gas company §Modern tank monitoring & leak detection system §Compliance with TCEQ, state, and city regulations Our Commitment to the Community §Commitment to maintaining a clean, safe, and well-managed site §Ongoing investment in upkeep, staffing, and property standards §Long-term local presence, not a short-term development §Focused on being a stable, positive addition to the neighborhood Our goal is to operate a well-maintained, safe, and respectful facility that serves the community’s needs for years to come EXTERIOR FINISH SCHEDULEMARKTYPESPECIFICATIONREMARKS LOCATIONCERACLADEXTERIORCERAMICPANEL Filtrated, Horizontal Install North and South exterior walls WS - 1WS - 2 STUCCO Rear of buildingManufacturer: Dur-a-flexType: Poly-crete MDBColor: Dark Grey METAL - Parapet caps- CanopiesMTL-1 SealedCERACLADEXTERIOR CERAMICPANEL Extruded, Horizontal Install Entry soffit"URBAN CEDAR"GOLDEN BROWN - NH4993UPORCELANOSAEXTERIORFACADE TILE Front tower"CONTEMPORAY SMOOTH"SILK - HEM908551HEXTL - 1STC - 1 COLOR: CHAMPAGNE 93330 MEDIUM TEXTURE WS - 3 EXTERIOR CERAMICPANEL "burnt orange"North and South exterior walls BOSTON BONE & BOSTON TOPONOTE: FINAL LAYOUT DESIGN BY PORCELANOSA FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" PARAPET- LOW 25' - 0" PARAPET- LOW 25' - 0" HIGH CEILING 16' - 0" HIGH CEILING 16' - 0" PARAPET - HIGH 28' - 0" 2 A7.1 WS-3 (WOOD-LOOK CERACLAD) EXTL-1 (PORCELAIN TILE)EXTL-1 (PORCELAIN TILE) PORCELAIN TILE E1 E2 W1 20 ' - 0 " LED BLADE SIGN BY OTHERS ADDRESS NUMBER LOCATION -MIN. 6" IN HEIGHT -CONTRASTING COLOR FROM BACKGROUND KNOX BOX LOCATION 5' - 0 " FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" FINISH FLOOR 0' - 0" PARAPET- LOW 25' - 0" PARAPET- LOW 25' - 0" PARAPET - HIGH 28' - 0"2 A7.1 E3 E4 STC-1 EXTL-1 (PORCELAIN TILE) CONTROL JOINTS, TYP. 12'-0" DECK 22' - 0" DECK 22' - 0" LED CHANNEL LETTERS DOWNSPOUT OVERFLOW SCUPPER LED WALL PACK PE R I B C 7' - 6 " ROOF ACCESS LADDER REF. SHEET A8.7 MANUFACTURED METAL AWNING BY OTHERS, REF. STRUCTUREA0.6 7 A0.6 7 A0.6 7 A0.6 7 A0.6 7 DRAIN PIPE (PAINT TO MATCH ADJACENT WALL) Copyright of Spector Knapp & Baughman, Ltd.Contractor shall verify and be responsible for all field dimensions and conditions and shall notify designer of any discrepancies before proceeding with the project. PROJECT S K BA R C H I T E C T U R E A N D D E S I G N Drawing Title: Proj: 3708 Spicewood Springs Road Suite 200 Austin, Texas 78759 512.916.0041 www.skbarch.com The Texas Board of Architectural Examiners, PO Box 12337, Austin, Texas, 78711-2337 or 333 Guadaloupe Suite 2-350, Austin, Texas 787-01-3942 (512) 305-9000, has jurisdiction over individuals licensed under the ASrchitect's Registration Law, Texas Civil Statutes, Article 249a.This file is an Instrument of Service to be used solely for thepurposes stipulated under separate contracts with the Architect. This document is copyrighted and is not to be used, duplicated or otherwise modified except with express permission of the Architect. Foodies - Liberty Hill 1487 US-183 Liberty Hill, Texas 78642 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS E/W A6.11776 SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"1 EAST ELEVATION SCALE: 1/4" = 1'-0"2 WEST ELEVATION ISSUED 02/28/25 PERMIT SET 03/11/25 1 - FIRE COMMENTS Proposed Development GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS G A S GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS G A S 10 17 7 8 5.0'25.0'5.5'100.0' 1.0' 10.0' 3.0' 15.0'6.0'105.5'5.5'18.0' 5. 0 ' 15 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 1. 0 ' 60 . 0 ' 10 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 25 . 0 ' 36 . 0 ' 30 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 10.0' 18 . 0 ' 10.0' 9.2'9.3'25.0'80.0'28.0' 144.0' 24 . 0 ' 5. 0 ' 6. 0 ' 62 . 3 ' 10 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 38 . 0 ' 30 . 0 ' 10.0' 10 . 0 ' 20.9' 21.1'28.0' 28.0' 5.0' 121.5' 30 . 0 ' 10.0' 45.0' 1 0 . 0 ' 1 0 . 0 ' 10. 3 ' 12.5' 10.0' 8 18 . 0 ' 25.0'100.0'10.0' 10 . 0 ' 7.0' 88 . 3 ' 5. 0 ' 30 . 0 ' 8 15.0'80.0'11.5' 80.0' 38 . 0 ' PR O P O S E D V A R I A B L E W I D T H CR O S S A C C E S S E A S E M E N T 50' BUILDING SETBACK LINE 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 20 ' L A N D S C A P E B U F F E R 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER 5' LANDSCAPE BUFFER S30°16'49"E 348.2' S5 9 ° 4 3 ' 1 1 " W 25 0 . 0 ' S30°16'49"E 726.9' S 1 4 ° 5 5 ' 3 9 " W 5 3 . 5 ' S6 0 ° 0 8 ' 0 7 " W 78 1 . 3 ' PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT 28 . 0 ' GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS 17 36 . 0 ' 30 . 0 ' 18 . 0 ' 20 . 0 ' 10.0' 121.5' 30 . 0 ' 10.0' 45.0'300.0' 200.0'100.0' 818 . 0 ' 80.0' 38 . 0 ' 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTH CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT NO R T H CO N C E P T P L A N 5 JOB NO.:065012201 SCALE:1" = 20' DATE:01/16/2026 KI M L E Y - H O R N A N D A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . 10 1 0 1 R E U N I O N P L A C E , S U I T E 4 0 0 , S A N A N T O N I O , T X 7 8 2 1 6 PH O N E : 2 1 0 - 5 4 1 - 9 1 6 6 F A X : 2 1 0 - 5 4 1 - 8 6 9 9 WW W . K I M L E Y - H O R N . C O M T B P E F I R M N O . 9 2 8 THIS DOCUMENT, TOGETHER WITH THE CONCEPTS AND DESIGNS PRESENTED HEREIN, AS AN INSTRUMENT OF SERVICE, IS INTENDED ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIC PURPOSE AND CLIENT FOR WHICH IT WAS PREPARED. REUSE OF AND IMPROPER RELIANCE ON THIS DOCUMENT WITHOUT WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION AND ADAPTATION BY KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. SHALL BE WITHOUT LIABILITY TO KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. COPYRIGHT KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., 2022K: \ S M A _ C i v i l \ 0 6 5 0 1 2 2 0 1 - F o o d i e s C o r n e r _ S c h e r t z \ C A D \ E x h i b i t s \ F o o d i e s S c h e r t z - C P 5 . d w g L a y o u t 1 J a n 1 6 , 2 0 2 6 1 2 : 0 5 p m b y : M a t t h e w . G a t t o FO O D I E S S C H E R T Z MA K G R O U P IN V E S T M E N T S L L C SITE DATA TOTAL LOT SIZE = ±86,500 SF (±1.99 AC) MAX IMPERVIOUS COVER 80%: ±69,200 SF (±1.59 AC) PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS COVER: ±68,200 SF (±1.57 AC) = ±78.8% ±6,700 SF C-STORE & 6,000 SF RETAIL BUILDINGS DRIVE-THRU LANE PROVIDED 13 . 3 ' 12.0' PARKING DATA C-STORE PARKING REQUIRED (1:250SF) = 27 STALLS RESTAURANT PARKING REQUIRED (1:200SF) = 10 STALLS (2,000SF ASSUMED) RETAIL PARKING REQUIRED (1:250SF) = 16 STALLS REQUIRED PARKING STALLS: 53 STALLS 58 PARKING STALLS PROVIDED Concept Plan Planning and Zoning Summary § Comments/Discussion from Staff: o Traffic concerns, TIA Discussion, gas station proposed use, delivery schedule o Minimal discussion on the proposed store and products § Comments/ Discussion from Public o Proximity to residential development o Late night nuisance o Hours of operation o Consideration of drainage o Lighting o Alternate location o Proximity to other gas stations o Tank size and fuel grades o Landscaping and fence o Sidewalks and pedestrian traffic consideration o Explanation of TIA from city engineer o Primary access clarification: FM 1518 Roadway Expansion and Traffic Potential Future Conflict Points and Traffic Lights: ~ 20+ Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan Proximity of Existing Gas Station Final Thoughts §Future growth along FM 1518 §Effort and dollars spent on feasibility and TIA study §Tax revenue and commercial growth Thank you! Agenda No. 11.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 26-S-012- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 0.2 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 502 Main Street, specifically known as Guadalupe Property Identification Number 67753, City of Schertz, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.2 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). The subject property is currently not platted and is used for a restaurant. The applicant is not proposing to change the current use and is requesting the zone change for the flexibility the zoning district allows to bring the property into compliance with the Unified Development Code. On April 23, 2026, sixteen (16) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of the report, one (1) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026. The meeting can be watched on the City of Schertz "Youtube" page. A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026. The applicant placed one notification sign on the subject property. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing  General Business District (GB) Restaurant Proposed  Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU) Restaurant Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North  Right-of-Way  Main St. South  Railroad Tracks Union Pacific Railroad  East  General Business District (GB) Office West  General Business District (GB) Undeveloped Zoning:  Dimensional Requirements Table 21.5.7.B- Non-Residential Zoning Districts Table 21.5.7.A- Residential Zoning Districts  Minimum Lot Size Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Misc. Lot Requirements  Zoning District Code Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft.Rear Ft.Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Exisiting General Business District GB 10,000 100 100 25 adj to non-res:0 adj to res.: 25 adj to non-res:0 adj to res.: 25 120'80% Proposed Main Street Mixed-Use District MSMU 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 35'80% GOAL The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.2 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When considering zone changes, staff looks to the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. The proposed zone change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan. The subject property is designated as Main Street on the Future Land Use Map. The Main Street Future Land Use Designation is intended for residential, commercial, cultural, and entertainment uses to create a dynamic urban core. The subject property is currently used as a restaurant and is intended to keep being used as a restaurant. The property is also part of the Main Street Corridor that is eligible for Main Street Grants. The proposed zone change to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU) implements the Future Land Use Map designation of Main Street. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. As part of promoting health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses, utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. Any new development will be required to meet the site design requirements listed in Article 9 of the Unified Development Code. The purpose of the zone change is to plat the property, thus promoting the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. The Engineering Department provided a traffic impact evaluation of the proposed zone change. The following conclusion was made:  "There is no increase or decrease in the expected traffic with the zone change request," and "...there is no adverse impact to the City's transportation system by the zone change request." The proposed zone change will not affect the safety of the City by adversely impacting traffic. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; The proposed Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU) is intended for properties along Main Street and in proximity to Main Street, and permits single-family, multi-family, and low-intensity commercial uses. Along Main Street, there are existing commercial uses which include other existing restaurants, professional offices, and retail. The applicant intends to continue the restaurant use in the proposed zoning district, which is consistent and appropriate with the existing uses in the immediate area. 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change application. The City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed zone change request and do not provide objections. A public hearing notice was mailed to SCUC ISD. The most recent demographic reports and forecasting reports are available as part of the staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for this item on May 6, 2026. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 26-S-012 due to the location of the subject property on Main Street, the compatibility with existing uses, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 7-0 vote. Attachments Ordinance 26-S-012 With Attachments Aerial Exhibit 200-Foot Notification Map Public Hearing Responses SCUC ISD Demographic Report SCUC ISD 10-Year Forecasting Engineering Memo on Traffic City Council Presentation Slides ORDINANCE NO. 26-S-012 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.2 ACRES OF LAND FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (GB) TO MAIN STREET MIXED-USE DISTRICT (MSMU), KNOWN AS 502 MAIN ST, SPECIFICALLY KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 67753, CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 0.2 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 502 Main Street, specifically known as Guadalupe Property Identification Number 67753, more specifically described in Exhibit A and Exhibit B attached herein (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zoning (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested zone change with a unanimous vote; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property, as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A and Exhibit B, approximately 0.2 acres of land is hereby zoned Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as t o the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this ____day of ________ 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit “A” Property Description: Legal Metes and Bounds .:• ... 0.168 Acre of Land out of the ~~ Schertz Mercantile Co. Tract in the G. Malpaz survey No. 67 Guadalupe County, Texas 0 e ~ 0.168 of an h:re or 7,329 Square Feet 1· -Jd GRAPltC SCALE Sheet 1 of 2 (Plat) . \ 501 Main street Schertz, Texas 78154 S 25050'()0" E 10.02' RLS#: ~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (AS FURNISHED) See Field Hem~ an 51.-2. cuerr-. 10631S~ F1ELO DATE: r:IS/UII06 DRAFTER: l'el0t G. C:.-0 APPROVED: MIii CINn9 SCALE: 1• • YI BASIS-OF au.RINGS: llle a.c!Mrty rtghtd~ lnld Mlln ~ llll!M!Q N 70"47'00" e. UST OF POSSJBl.E ENCROACHMENTS: Hv eocachnea -.i:rnlllllt at.llrnuf UYI'/ -SU 'OR INFORMATJQN: C ~----- FAST BUJa.INElAM> SURVEYING OF TEXAS ◄200 South Freeway, SUite ◄30 Fort Worth, Teicas 76115 817-924--t?OO fax 817-92+4702 aUan.cavlnessOl'astbluellne.com SURVEYOR Fil£ NUMBER: RESlDBN'UfAl!, ~~~s, 1wc;, Ul. :MTll.\11911111.W. NORMAN, 0IILIIIOMA ?>Ht ,.ua (CN) ftl;'tlOl PHOflt (40S)7t1,1S" W\VW.Al.SIIOW.coM ""=~"=--~....:.=---AC;~00N01T1011ER O!IU:O'IERH!AOUTIITYUE CERTIFIED • ("5 FIJRNISHEO) IIUIQ.: IUL0NI 11'-k I\AfflD (I;:.~ CAl.aAATED P .ll.l l'OIMT 01' CU\11.1\TIN fhtMwic:annll !Mnla Caap,r,y ~!9ql,edalflll>Xors>&qlieaa c.lJ r;tiO!ID If.WNO PU: l'!lll,WelTCO!ITRDI, POINT CIW;COll()MIIILDCl(Wlil P.i. l'OINTar~ :CEIITSUli PAa.:POINfOl'll!OINNIIO CJl>..:(1011N111 ~ ACCl!S1al P.O.C.:1'01NTO,C0MNINC88fr COIICJCXJNCRETli P.PJPOY.91P0.£ 1-----_-_-.:..:..,N/fEJ~===-----t -~CCMIIIII ,.~l'OINTDI'~ C. C0N<;l!£li IU9 CIJIVA'IUIII Clli DIIClll'TIIII PJUI.; PIRIIAllllff Rffl!!Wa ON/'. ClfM.'f/AY MOIIJMaff !NC: l!HC~ P.T a l'OINT 0P TNGQICV LO,WJ EDGe OF...,,._'181 !WI: RIGHl'CI' WAY (1,1.):MEAUIID eNl:lloewALK IIAsJMAIOIIRY ClJ': CIIAIN~ftNCE SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I. Allin CM\ ... ,__ R8Qlltnd Proltalonil Land ~No. 4365 do twre11v tlwt the Rl';Ol' c,lile hnon Is I true aid 1e01r.tJe1'1)1-,tal!uc, dh P'OPd\Y,:-, ~.Ind do lwlhlr llllltthatOilsaneylCQRWfdoj,lash~ ~to .. ldl)IOl)dty ... ~ erlC!llld>1e1ts0111Dllld w .. U..ftno~ •• ear,l15._.,hnon, fOlt. n<I! ---·---.. ~JU,ILUllllK Vt!':WOOO~ L-=====;.,;;;;;.;;.;i£iia;uiivEIBi7 H1M':H00-WIR& F1ila! lHIIS fUIW'I • pR£PIN!l F01t n£ ElCCllJSIVE US! DATED: May 11, 2006 WITHOUT AA AU'THENTICATEO a.e¢lRON 0 LECTRONIC IC SIGNAl\1RE Nil> IIEJIEf!TaPTI£ PNtTIU Ufl!D HEREON. UNIIJTYTOlttllOP~ MAY NOTI& ~ORJolillGll!D. Revtewed & Accepted by: Date REVISION REVISION Form UTX Date Exhibit “B” Zoning Exhibit R- 2 GB GB GB GB R- 2 R- 2 R- 2 GB U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d MS M U F M 7 8 M A I N S T LINDB E R G H A V E 1ST S T E X C H A N G E A V E W U E S T S T R- 2 GB GB GB GB R- 2 R- 2 R- 2 GB U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d F M 7 8 M A I N S T LINDB E R G H A V E 1ST S T E X C H A N G E A V E W U E S T S T La s t u p d a t e : A p r i l 2 0 , 2 0 2 6 Ci t y o f S c h e r t z , G I S S p e c i a l i s t : B i l l G a r d n e r , gi s @ s c h e r t z . c o m ( 2 1 0 ) 6 1 9 - 1 1 8 5 *T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z p r o v i d e s t h i s G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m p r o d u c t " a s i s " w i t h o u t a n y e x p r e s s o r i m p l i e d w a r r a n t y o f a n y k i n d i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t li m i t e d t o t h e i m p l i e d w a r r a n t i e s o f m e r c h a n t a b i l i t y a n d f i t n e s s f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p u r p o s e . I n n o e v e n t s h a l l T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z b e l i a b l e f o r a n y s p e c i a l , in d i r e c t , o r c o n s e q u e n t i a l d a m a g e s o r a n y d a m a g e s w h a t s o e v e r a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e u s e o f o r p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e s e m a t e r i a l s . In f o r m a t i o n p u b l i s h e d i n t h i s p r o d u c t c o u l d i n c l u d e t e c h n i c a l i n a c c u r a c i e s o r t y p o g r a p h i c a l e r r o r s . P e r i o d i c a l c h a n g e s m a y b e a d d e d t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n he r e i n . T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z m a y m a k e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d / o r c h a n g e s i n t h e p r o d u c t ( s ) d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n a t a n y t i m e . * 50 2 M a i n S t r e e t (P L Z C 2 0 2 6 0 1 0 1 ) CU R R E N T (D V L ) D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t ( D e l a y e d A n n e x a t i o n ) (M - 2 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( H e a v y ) (M - 1 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( L i g h t ) (M S M U - N D ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e N e w D e v e l o p m e n t (M S M U ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e (O P ) O f f i c e a n d P r o f e s s i o n a l (N S ) N e i g h b o r h o o d S e r v i c e s (G B - 2 ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s I I (G B ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s (M H P ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e P a r k s (M H S ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e S u b d i v i s i o n (T H ) T o w n h o m e (G H ) G a r d e n H o m e / S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l ( Z e r o L o t L i n e ) (A D ) A g r i c u l t u r a l D i s t r i c t (R - 7 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 6 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 4 ) A p a r t m e n t / M u l t i - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 3 ) T w o - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 2 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 1 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - A ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l / A g r i c u l t u r a l (P U B ) P u b l i c U s e (P D D ) P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t (P R E ) P r e - D e v e l o p m e n t Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Zo n i n g C h a n g e PR O P O S E D µ 0 15 0 30 0 75 Fe e t Proposed Zone Change 502 Main Street PLZC20260101 Planned Commercial Collector A Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector B Planned Residential Collector Residential Collector Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Freeway Minor Roads Major Roads Highways Project Boundary ETJ Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries Unknown 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" 1" Private Pressure Neighboring Gravity Schertz Pressure Schertz Gravity Sewer Main Schertz Treatment Plant3Q CCMA Treatment Plant3Q Schertz Lift Station[Ú Private Lift Station[Ú CCMA Lift Station[Ú Manholes!P HydrantU U U U U U U U U U U U U U !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P 67696 CHILDREN OF GOD CHURCH INC 40841 GRANGER REALTY & INVESTMENTS LLC 6 7 6 5 7 R A N D O L P H L O D G E # 1 2 6 8 6 7 5 4 9 S C H E R T Z B A N K & T R U S T 6 7 6 1 6 L O N G O R I A M I N I S T R I E S I N C 41124 FAULTERSACK STEVEN ADAM 41123 SANCHEZ MARY ESTELLA 41122 UAMD LLC 41121 CITY OF SCH E R T Z 41118 E S SCHERTZ 78 LLC 67454 MARTINEZ ALFONSO R 67423 MARTINEZ ALFONSO R 67684 426 MAIN ST LLC 21464 TWITERO FAMILY TRUST 67719 SOUTHERN PACIFIC 67697 SCHERTZ BANK & TRUST 67531 PONCE MARIO SANDOVAL 67501 DAILEY BALIS E JR 32861 WALTEL LLC 32859 WALTEL LLC 67753 LOPEZ DANY EDUARDO DBA MELANIES CAFE 40842 VIDAL RANDAL J & MELISSA K 67686 ROWELL KRISTI MICHELLE 6 7 6 2 1 H U E R T A J O E & F R A N C E S H U E R T A & J O L E A N H U E R T A 137487 KAPADIA JAGDISH 67718 SOUTHERN PACIFIC 67704 JOHN GANNON INC 67489 CITY OF SCHERTZ 67548 301 FIRST STREET LLC 148344 CHILDREN OF GOD CHURCH INC 6 7 7 7 1 P E N T E C O S T A L L I F E C H U R C H I N C 6 7 5 7 7 H U B E R L E E & D I C K P E R R A 6 7 5 6 2 H P P R I N T I N G I N C 67486 BURCH ROBERT R 67445 LNG PROPERTIES INC 67610 BURCH ROBERT R 67679 BURCH ROBERT R 67690 BURCH ROBERT R 67530 TRES ANGELES LLC 148343 PHILIP ELIZABETH PROPERTIES LLC 67612 A01B01 LLC 67564 CITY OF SCHERTZ 67500 6K PROPERTIES LLC 67647 BLCH1 LLC 10005052 (UNAVAILABLE) Union P a F i I i F 8  W L 6 WL 8 WL 3  W L 12 W L 12 W L 2 WL 1 2  W L 12 W L 6  W L 6 WL 8  W L 6 WL 6  W L 12 W L 6 WL 8 WL 2 WL 6  W L 6 WL 1 8  W L 2 WL 6 WL 8 WL 6  W L 6 WL 3  W L 6  W L 10 WL 4 WL 2 WL 6Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8P V C S D R 3 5 8  V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6  V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8Vitri f i e d C l a y 8Vitri f i e d C l a y 8Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8Vitr i f i e d C l a y 3 U 7  U 7 0$, 1  U 7 ()0331 )0   )0  0 , / / 6 7  6 7 6 7 &+85 & +  6 7 % ( $ & 2 P  $ 9 ( 5 $ P ' 2 / 3 +  $ 9 ( 0$,P  6 7  6 7  6 7 / , P ' % ( 5 * +  $ 9 ( &857 , 6 6  $ 9 ( :8(6 7  6 7 ( $ 9 ,$7,2 P %/9 ' /(( (;&+ $ P * (  $ 9 ( Microsoft, Vantor µ0 150 30075 Feet 5 0 7 M A I N S T ( 6 7 6 5 7 ) 5 0 9 M A I N S T ( 6 7 5 4 9 ) 5 1 3 M A I N S T ( 6 7 6 1 6 ) MAIN ST (67454) 432 MAIN ST (67423) 519 MAIN ST (67697) 508 MAIN ST (32861) 506 MAIN ST (32859) 502 MAIN ST (67753) 409 MAIN ST (67621) 415 MAIN ST (137487) 110 FM 78 (67486) 216 FM 78 (67445) 206 FM 78 (67530) FM 78 (UNAVAILABLE) 417 MAIN ST (67500) 210 FM 78 (67647) U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d L I N D B E R G H A V E EXCH A N G E A V E 1 S T S T LEE FM 78 MAIN S T WUEST S T Last update: April 20, 2026 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Bill Gardner, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1185 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* Proposed Zone Change 502 Main Street (PLZC20260101) City of Schertz Parcels 200' Buffer Project Boundary µ0 100 20050 Feet 4Q24 Demographic Report 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.8 01234 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year  Over Year Dec‐24 Dec‐23 2 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.4 3.5 3.7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p ‐19 No v ‐19 Ja n ‐20 Ma r ‐20 Ma y ‐20 Ju l ‐20 Se p ‐20 No v ‐20 Ja n ‐21 Ma r ‐21 Ma y ‐21 Ju l ‐21 Se p ‐21 No v ‐21 Ja n ‐22 Ma r ‐22 Ma y ‐22 Ju l ‐22 Se p ‐22 No v ‐22 Ja n ‐23 Ma r ‐23 Ma y ‐23 Ju l ‐23 Se p ‐23 No v ‐23 Ja n ‐24 Ma r ‐24 Ma y ‐24 Ju l ‐24 Se p ‐24 No v ‐24 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Dec 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 3 Local Economic Conditions San Antonio International Airport •Broke ground on third terminal at end of 2024 •Estimated total cost = $2.5 billion •Third terminal will anchor the expansion &  improvement project housing as many as 17  new gates spanning approx. 850,000 sq. ft.  •Will include concessions and lounge areas  while housing new Federal Inspection Station  to accommodate expanded international air  service •Expected to generate $3.2 billion in revenue  for the city over 15 years •New ground loading facility also added at  Terminal A including new passenger gates and  overnight aircraft parking •The third terminal is scheduled for completion  in 2028 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 18,503 19,046 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q4 2015Q4 2016Q4 2017Q4 2018Q4 2019Q4 2020Q4 2021Q4 2022Q4 2023Q4 2024Q4 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings Source:  Zonda San Antonio New Home Starts & Closings Key Trends Starts:  +26% YOY  / +6% QOQ Closings:  +4% YOY / +6% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 543 Homes 6 SCUC ISD Housing Market Analysis Average New vs. Existing Home Sale Price, 2013 - 2024 • The average new home sale price in SCUC ISD has risen 54% between 2014 and 2024, an increase of more than $135,200 • The average existing home sale price in SCUC ISD has risen 85% in the last 10 years, an increase of more than $158,800 Avg New Home Avg Existing Home 2014 $250,897 $187,097  2015 $262,532 $181,881  2016 $284,037 $189,189  2017 $297,182 $197,710  2018 $328,762 $221,637  2019 $314,299 $234,868  2020 $318,065 $247,691  2021 $345,858 $257,537  2022 $431,606 $327,526  2023 $422,149 $333,286  2024 $386,156 $345,921  $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 New Home Price Existing Home Price 7 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –4Q24 * Based on additional Zonda Education housing research Rank District Name Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1NORTHSIDE ISD (BEXAR) 3,739 3,920 1,909 6,114 21,246 2COMAL ISD 2,691 3,028 1,670 4,843 21,591 3MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,377 2,410 1,232 5,228 27,810 4EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,513 2,230 1,243 4,351 24,478 5SOUTHWEST ISD 1,301 1,328 628 2,269 7,296 6 JUDSON ISD 615 899 207 547 871 7SCUC ISD 787 894 391 2,113 5,896 8NAVARRO ISD 841 832 453 1,290 6,635 9 BOERNE ISD 777 761 497 1,545 9,427 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 700 730 322 927 16,702 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 656 589 407 854 6,164 12 NORTH EAST ISD 397 361 234 906 5,196 13 SEGUIN ISD 325 342 204 668 5,384 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 300 238 164 86 790 15 MARION ISD 230 174 139 327 4,559 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 116 137 49 227 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 59 87 126 305 772 18 LYTLE ISD 91 76 44 319 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 54 61 25 72 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 3 41 8 15 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 8 District New Home Starts and Closings Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 161 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 214 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 773 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 898 9 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Elementary Annual  Starts Quarter  Starts Annual  Closings Quarter  Closings Under  Const.Inventory Vacant   Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 76 11 123 30 13 33 118 36 GREEN VALLEY00000 0 00 PASCHAL 10321 141242 ROSE GARDEN 234 64 230 53 85 137 827 2,499 SCHERTZ 0 0210 0 1 060 SIPPEL 298 70 277 68 76 154 729 1,817 WATTS 47 7 80 20 8 16 15 580 WIEDERSTEIN 131 9 160 41 13 49 383 662 Grand Total 787 161 894 214 196 391 2,113 5,896 Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category • The district has 23 actively building subdivisions • Within SCUC ISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning • Of these, groundwork is underway on more than 500 lots within 6 subdivisions • 462 lots were delivered in the 4 th quarter 10 District Housing Overview Mont Blanc • 100 total future lots • Preliminary plat approved Jan 2023 • Groundwork underway on all lots 11 Residential Activity Homestead • 1,470 total lots • 783 future lots • 296 vacant developed lots • 20 homes under construction • 339 homes occupied • Started 66 homes in last 12 months; started 16 homes in 4Q24 • Equipment on site for 62 lots in Phase 11 • $400K - $700K January 24, 2025 12 Residential Activity Saddle Creek Ranch • 807 total lots • 36 future lots • 61 vacant developed lots • 7 homes under construction • 690 homes occupied • Closed 61 homes in last 12 months; closed 16 homes in 2Q24 • Groundwork underway on remaining lots • $290K+ Grace Valley – Cibolo Farms • 331 total lots • 186 future lots • 124 vacant developed lots • 17 homes under construction • First homes started 4Q24 • Lennar January 24, 2025 13 Residential Activity Grace Valley • 868 total lots • 557 future lots • 163 vacant developed lots • 16 homes under construction • 128 homes occupied • Closed 123 homes in last 12 months; closed 32 homes in 4Q24 • Groundwork underway on 111 lots in Phase 3A • Lennar • $237K+ January 24, 2025 14 Residential Activity Venado Crossing • 507 total lots • 311 future lots • 15 vacant developed lots • 8 homes under construction • 165 homes occupied • Closed 48 homes in last 12 months; closed 20 homes in 4Q24 • Groundwork underway on 61 lots in Phase 4 • $350K+ Steele Creek • 940 total lots • 335 future lots • 118 vacant developed lots • 1 home under construction • 474 homes occupied • Closed 98 homes in last 12 months; closed 25 homes in 4Q24 • Delivered 111 lots for homebuilding in 4Q24 • DR Horton • $365K+ 15 Residential Activity Saddlebrook Ranch • 635 total lots • 335 future lots • 287 vacant developed lots • 12 homes under construction • Started first homes 3Q24 • Delivered 132 lots for homebuilding in Phase 4 & 5 in 4Q24 • Ashton Woods • $362K+ January 24, 2025 16 Residential Activity Crossvine • 1,017 total lots • 168 future lots • 291 vacant developed lots • 19 homes under construction • 516 homes occupied • Started 56 homes in last 12 months; started 15 homes in 4Q24 • $400K+ Clearwater Creek • 1,156 total future lots • Prelim plat Phase 1 (104 lots) approved April 2022 • Groundwork underway on Phase 1 • Lennar 17 Residential Activity January 24, 2025 18 Housing Market Trends: Multi‐family market‐December 2024 • There are 618 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes • There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district 19 District Multifamily Overview 20 Multi‐Family Activity January 24, 2025 Aviator 1518 • 300 apartment units under construction • Groundwork started early 2024 • Estimated lease date late spring 2025 21 Multi‐Family Activity Schertz Station • 318 single-family rental homes under construction • Groundwork started July 2024 • Estimated lease date August 2025 January 24, 2025 • There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district • The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 22 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 23 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 24 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12) 827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13) 862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14) 937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15) 985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16) 989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17) 995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18) 1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19) 982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20) 1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21) 951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22) 935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23) 819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24) 788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25) 739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26) 699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27) 763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28) 750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29) 776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz‐Cibolo‐U City ISD KG  Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 25 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten  Year  Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.) EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total  Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 ‐369 ‐2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 ‐375 ‐2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 ‐200 ‐1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 ‐107 ‐0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 ‐221 ‐1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 ‐209 ‐1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 ‐172 ‐1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 ‐197 ‐1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 ‐63 ‐0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 ‐89 ‐0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 ‐165 ‐1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 ‐41 ‐0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 ‐50.0% 26 Ten  Year  Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus  Functional  Capacity Max  Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change ‐4.17%‐3.35%‐1.80%‐1.18% 0.72% 1.06% 2.22%1.44% 1.75% 1.72% 1.91% Elementary Absolute Change ‐213 ‐164 ‐85 ‐55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%‐0.40%‐3.73%‐2.61%‐4.69%‐5.02%‐3.97% 2.48% 2.85% 0.47% 2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 ‐9 ‐83 ‐56 ‐98 ‐100 ‐75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change ‐4.01%‐2.01% 4.31%‐0.96%‐3.96%‐2.68%‐4.73%‐4.73%‐4.02% 2.43% 2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change ‐98 ‐47 99 ‐23 ‐94 ‐61 ‐105 ‐100 ‐81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92% 2.07%‐2.72%‐1.38%‐0.24%‐1.59% 0.25%‐1.95%‐4.30%‐3.68%‐4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 ‐152 ‐75 ‐13 ‐85 13 ‐103 ‐222 ‐182 ‐203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change ‐1.32%‐0.72%‐1.49%‐1.43%‐1.19%‐1.38%‐0.45%‐0.64%‐1.19%‐0.30%‐0.04% District Absolute Change ‐200 ‐107 ‐221 ‐209 ‐172 ‐197 ‐63 ‐89 ‐165 ‐41 ‐5 27 Key Takeaways   Annual closings near 900 in 2024 Housing market remains cloudy with continued  high interest rates  and looming tariffs   The district has more than 390 homes currently in  inventory and more than 2,100 vacant developed  lots available for builders Groundwork is underway on approx. 500 lots  within 6 subdivisions Schertz‐Cibolo‐Universal City ISD is forecasted to  enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (C URRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Daisy Marquez, Senior Planner From: John Nowak, P.E., Engineer Date: April 22, 2026 Re: Traffic Impact Summary for Proposed Zone Change for 502, 506, and 508 Main Street The properties at 502, 506, and 508 Main Street are currently zoned GB, General Business. The property owner is requesting MSMU, Zoning, a specific zoning district for the Main Street corridor. The properties are currently fully developed and no change of uses are expected with the zone change request. Therefore, there is no increase or decrease in expected traffic generation associated with this zone change request. As such, there is no adverse impact to the City’s transportation system by the zone change request. Ord.26-S-012 Proposed 0.2 ac Zone Change to MSMU Daisy Marquez| Senior Planner 32 Zoning Use Subject Property General Business District Restaurant North Right of Way Main St South Railroad Union Pacific East General Business District (GB) Randolph Realty Offices West General Business District (GB) Undeveloped •0.2 acres •Current Zoning: GB •Proposed: MSMU 33 Dimensional Requirements 21.5.7 Permitted Uses 21.5.8 Existing Proposed General Business District (GB)Main Street Mixed-Use (MSMU) Permitted Uses *Not a Comprehensive List Appliances, Furniture and Home Furnishing Store; Building Material and Hardware Sales; Car Wash, Automated ; Commercial Amusement, Indoor Antique Shop, Parking Garage, Bakery, Bank, Book Store, Day Care Center, Dance Hall/ Nightclub, Gymnastics Studio, Health/ Fitness, Medical/ Professional Office/ Clinic,Restaurant Area Square Feet 10,000 5,000 Width & Depth 100 x 100 50x100 Setbacks, Adj. Non- Residential Front: 20’, Side: NA, Rear: NA Front:10, Side:5, Rear:10 Maximum Height 120’35’ Maximum Impervious Coverage 80%80% 34 •17 Public notices were sent on 04.23.2026 •As of today •(1) in Favor •(0) Neutral to •(0) in Opposition •A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” May 13, 2026 • 1 notification sign was placed by the applicant •P&Z: May 6, 2026 35 36 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Main Street- Future Land Use Designation •Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential •Low-Intensity Commercial •Cultural and Entertainment Uses •Proposed MSMU •Consistent with the Comp Plan – FLUP 37 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Engineering Memo •“There is no expected increase or decrease in traffic” •“there is no adverse impact to the City’s transportation system by this zone change request” •Proposed Zone Change to MSMU: •Promotes health, safety, and welfare of the City 38 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •MSMU •Intended for properties on Main Street and in Main Street Corridor •Permitted Uses Include: Single-Family, Multi-Family, Low-Intensity Commercial, Cultural and Entertainment Uses •Along Main Street: •Restaurants, professional offices, and retail •Proposed MSMU is consistent and appropriate 39 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Schertz Fire, EMS, and PD do not have objections to the proposed zone change. •Public hearing notice was sent to SCUC ISD. •Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for this item on May 6, 2026. 40 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ord.26-S-012 due to the location of the subject property on Main Street, the compatibility with existing uses and Comprehensive Land Use Plan-Future Land Use Map. P&Z Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026 and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 7-0 vote. Agenda No. 12.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 26-S-013 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 506 Main St. and 508 Main St., specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 32859 and 32861, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.(B.James/L.Wood/D.Marquez) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). The subject property is platted and is used for a realty office. The applicant is not proposing to change the use and is requesting the zone change for the flexibility the zoning district allows. On April 23, 2026, seventeen (17) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. A public hearing notice was mailed to SCUC ISD. At the time of the report, once (1) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026. The meeting can be viewed on the City of Schertz "Youtube" page. A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 16, 2026. The applicant placed two notification signs on the subject property. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing General Business District (GB)Realty Office Proposed Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU)Realty Office Adjacent Properties:   Zoning Land Use North Right-of-Way Main Street South Railroad Tracks Union Pacific Railroad East Right-of-Way 1st Street West General Business District (GB)Restaurant Zoning:  Dimensional Requirements Table 21.5.7.B- Non-Residential Zoning Districts Table 21.5.7.A- Residential Zoning Districts  Minimum Lot Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Misc. Requirements  Zoning District Code Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Existing General Business District GB 10,000 100 100 25 adj to non-res: 0 adj to res: 25 adj to non-res: 0 adj to res: 25 120'80% Proposed Main Street Mixed-Use District MSMU 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 35'80% GOAL The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When considering zone changes, staff looks to the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. The proposed zone change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan. The subject property is designated as Main Street on the Future Land Use Map. The Main Street Future Land Use Designation is intended for residential, commercial, cultural, and entertainment uses to create a dynamic urban core. The subject property is currently used for a realty office, a low-intensity commercial use. Additionally, the property is located on Main Street and is part of the Main Street Corridor. The proposed zone change to Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU) implements the Future Land Use Map designation of Main Street. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. As part of promoting the health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses, utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. Any new development will be required to meet the site design requirements listed in Article 9 of the Unified Development Code. The proposed zone change is being done in conjunction with the adjacent property, 502 Main Street, thus promoting the general welfare of the City. The Engineering Department provided a traffic impact evaluation of the proposed zone change. The following conclusion was made:  "There is no increase or decrease in the expected traffic with the zone change request," and "...there is no adverse impact to the City's transportation system by the zone change request." "...there is no adverse impact to the City's transportation system by the zone change request."  The proposed zone change will not affect the safety of the City by adversely impacting traffic. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; The proposed Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU) is intended for properties along Main Street and in proximity to Main Street, and permits single-family, multi-family, and low-intensity commercial uses. The subject property is used for a realty office and is intended to continue doing so. To the left of the property is a restaurant and across 1st Street, there is a parking lot. Along Main Street, there are professional offices, restaurants, hair salons, cafes, and retail. The uses permitted within the proposed MSMU zoning are consistent and appropriate with the existing uses in the immediate area. 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change application. The City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have reviewed the proposed zone change request and do not provide objections. A public hearing notice was mailed to SCUC ISD. The most recent demographic reports and forecasting reports are available as part of the staff report. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026. RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 26-S-013 due to the location of the subject property on Main Street, the compatibility of the proposed zone change with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map, and the existing uses in the immediate area. Planning and Zoning Commission: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 7-0 vote. Attachments Ordinance 26-S-013 With Attachments Aerial Exhibit 200-Foot Notification Map Public Hearing Response SCUC ISD Demographic Reports SCUC ISD Forecasting Report Engineering Memo on Traffic Impact City Council Presentation Slides ORDINANCE NO. 26-S-013 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, TO REZONE APPROXIMATELY 0.4 ACRES OF LAND FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (GB) TO MAIN STREET MIXED-USE DISTRICT (MSMU), KNOWN AS 506 MAIN ST and 508 MAIN ST, SPECIFICALLY KNOWN AS GUADALUPE COUNTY PROPERTY IDENTIFICATION NUMBERS 32859 and 32861, CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), known as 506 Main Street and 508 Main Street, specifically known as Guadalupe Property Identification Numbers 32859 and 32861, more specifically described in Exhibit A attached herein (herein, the “Property”) has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City’s Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zoning (the “Criteria”); and WHEREAS, on May 6, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested zone change with a unanimous vote; and WHEREAS, on June 2, 2026, the City Council conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property, as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, approximately 0.4 acres of land is hereby zoned Main Street Mixed-Use District (MSMU). Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as t o the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 9. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED on this ____day of ________ 2026. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Rodriguez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Exhibit “A” Zoning Exhibit R- 2 GB GB GB GB R- 2 R- 2 R- 2 GB U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d MS M U F M 7 8 M A I N S T LINDB E R G H A V E 1ST S T E X C H A N G E A V E W U E S T S T R- 2 GB GB GB GB R- 2 R- 2 R- 2 GB U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d F M 7 8 M A I N S T LINDB E R G H A V E 1ST S T E X C H A N G E A V E W U E S T S T La s t u p d a t e : A p r i l 2 2 , 2 0 2 6 Ci t y o f S c h e r t z , G I S S p e c i a l i s t : B i l l G a r d n e r , gi s @ s c h e r t z . c o m ( 2 1 0 ) 6 1 9 - 1 1 8 5 *T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z p r o v i d e s t h i s G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m p r o d u c t " a s i s " w i t h o u t a n y e x p r e s s o r i m p l i e d w a r r a n t y o f a n y k i n d i n c l u d i n g b u t n o t li m i t e d t o t h e i m p l i e d w a r r a n t i e s o f m e r c h a n t a b i l i t y a n d f i t n e s s f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p u r p o s e . I n n o e v e n t s h a l l T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z b e l i a b l e f o r a n y s p e c i a l , in d i r e c t , o r c o n s e q u e n t i a l d a m a g e s o r a n y d a m a g e s w h a t s o e v e r a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e u s e o f o r p e r f o r m a n c e o f t h e s e m a t e r i a l s . In f o r m a t i o n p u b l i s h e d i n t h i s p r o d u c t c o u l d i n c l u d e t e c h n i c a l i n a c c u r a c i e s o r t y p o g r a p h i c a l e r r o r s . P e r i o d i c a l c h a n g e s m a y b e a d d e d t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n he r e i n . T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z m a y m a k e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d / o r c h a n g e s i n t h e p r o d u c t ( s ) d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n a t a n y t i m e . * 50 6 & 5 0 8 M a i n S t r e e t CU R R E N T (D V L ) D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t ( D e l a y e d A n n e x a t i o n ) (M - 2 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( H e a v y ) (M - 1 ) M a n u f a c t u r i n g ( L i g h t ) (M S M U - N D ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e N e w D e v e l o p m e n t (M S M U ) M a i n S t r e e t M i x e d U s e (O P ) O f f i c e a n d P r o f e s s i o n a l (N S ) N e i g h b o r h o o d S e r v i c e s (G B - 2 ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s I I (G B ) G e n e r a l B u s i n e s s (M H P ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e P a r k s (M H S ) M a n u f a c t u r e d H o m e S u b d i v i s i o n (T H ) T o w n h o m e (G H ) G a r d e n H o m e / S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l ( Z e r o L o t L i n e ) (A D ) A g r i c u l t u r a l D i s t r i c t (R - 7 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 6 ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 4 ) A p a r t m e n t / M u l t i - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 3 ) T w o - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 2 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - 1 ) S i n g l e - F a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l (R - A ) S i n g l e - f a m i l y R e s i d e n t i a l / A g r i c u l t u r a l (P U B ) P u b l i c U s e (P D D ) P l a n n e d D e v e l o p m e n t (P R E ) P r e - D e v e l o p m e n t Cl a s s i f i c a t i o n Pr o p o s e d Zo n i n g C h a n g e PR O P O S E D µ 0 15 0 30 0 75 Fe e t Proposed Zone Change 506 & 508 Main Street Planned Commercial Collector A Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector B Planned Residential Collector Residential Collector Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Freeway Minor Roads Major Roads Highways Project Boundary ETJ Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries Unknown 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" 1" Private Pressure Neighboring Gravity Schertz Pressure Schertz Gravity Sewer Main Schertz Treatment Plant3Q CCMA Treatment Plant3Q Schertz Lift Station[Ú Private Lift Station[Ú CCMA Lift Station[Ú Manholes!P HydrantU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P 67696 CHILDREN OF GOD CHURCH INC 40841 GRANGER REALTY & INVESTMENTS LLC 6 7 6 5 7 R A N D O L P H L O D G E # 1 2 6 8 6 7 5 4 9 S C H E R T Z B A N K & T R U S T 6 7 6 1 6 L O N G O R I A M I N I S T R I E S I N C 41124 FAULTERSACK STEVEN ADAM 41123 SANCHEZ MARY ESTELLA 41122 UAMD L L C 41121 CITY OF SCH E R T Z 41118 E S SCHERTZ 78 LLC 67454 MARTINEZ ALFONSO R 67423 MARTINEZ ALFONSO R 67684 426 MAIN ST LLC 21464 TWITERO FAMILY TRUST 67719 SOUTHERN PACIFIC 67697 SCHERTZ BANK & TRUST 67531 PONCE MARIO SANDOVAL 67501 DAILEY BALIS E JR 32861 WALTEL LLC 32859 WALTEL LLC 67753 LOPEZ DANY EDUARDO DBA MELANIES CAFE 40842 VIDAL RANDAL J & MELISSA K 67686 ROWELL KRISTI MICHELLE 6 7 6 2 1 H U E R T A J O E & F R A N C E S H U E R T A & J O L E A N H U E R T A 137487 KAPADIA JAGDISH 67718 SOUTHERN PACIFIC 67704 JOHN GANNON INC 67489 CITY OF SCHERTZ 67548 301 FIRST STREET LLC 148344 CHILDREN OF GOD CHURCH INC 6 7 7 7 1 P E N T E C O S T A L L I F E C H U R C H I N C 6 7 5 7 7 H U B E R L E E & D I C K P E R R A 6 7 5 6 2 H P P R I N T I N G I N C 67486 BURCH ROBERT R 67445 LNG PROPERTIES INC 67610 BURCH ROBERT R 67679 BURCH ROBERT R 67690 BURCH ROBERT R 67530 TRES ANGELES LLC 148343 PHILIP ELIZABETH PROPERTIES LLC 67612 A01B01 LLC 67564 CITY OF SCHERTZ 67500 6K PROPERTIES LLC 67647 BLCH1 L L C 10005052 (UNAVAILABLE) Union P a c i f i c 8" W L 8 " W L 12" WL 6" W L 3 " W L 12" W L 8" W L 1 2 " W L 2" W L 1 2 " W L 12" W L 6 " W L 6" WL 6 " W L 8 " W L 6 " W L 12" W L 2" WL 6" WL 2" WL 2" WL 8" WL 2 " W L 6 " W L 6" W L 1 8 " W L 8 " W L 8" W L 6 " W L 6" W L 6" W L 6 " W L 6" WL 2" WL 3 " W L 6 " W L 6 " W L 6 " W L 4" WL 10" WL 2" W L 2" W L 2" W L 12"V i t r i f i e d C l a y 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 6"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6"Vitrified Clay 6 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 8"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 8 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 6"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 8"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 6"Vit r i f i e d C l a y 1 5 " U n d e t e r m i n e d 1 S T S T MAIN S T E FM 1518 N FM 78 FM 78 D O W M A N S T R A N D O L P H A V E 1 S T S T WRIG H T AVE CHUR C H S T L I N D B E R G H A V E W I L L I A M S 2 N D S T CURT I S S A V E B E A C O N A V E B E A C O N A V E MAIN S T EXCH A N G E A V E M I L L S T 1 S T S T WUES T S T LEE E A V I A T I O N B L V D AZTE C W AY Microsoft, Vantor 0 100 20050 Feetµ 507 MAIN S T (676 5 7 ) 509 MAIN S T (675 4 9 ) 513 MAIN S T (676 1 6 ) MA I N S T (6 7 4 5 4 ) 51 9 MA I N S T (6 7 6 9 7 ) 50 8 MA I N S T (3 2 8 6 1 ) 50 6 MA I N S T (3 2 8 5 9 ) 50 2 MA I N S T (6 7 7 5 3 ) 11 0 FM 7 8 (6 7 4 8 6 ) 21 6 FM 7 8 (6 7 4 4 5 ) 20 6 FM 7 8 (6 7 5 3 0 ) FM 7 8 (U N A V A I L A B L E ) 41 7 MA I N S T (6 7 5 0 0 ) 21 0 FM 7 8 (6 7 6 4 7 ) 52 8 MA I N S T (2 1 4 6 4 ) MA I N S T (6 7 7 1 9 ) 2 0 5 1 S T S T ( 4 1 1 2 2 ) 2 0 1 1 S T S T ( 4 1 1 2 1 ) U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d U n i o n P a c i f i c R a i l r o a d 1ST ST LINDB E R G H A V E E X C H A N G E A V E L E E W U E S T S T F M 7 8 M A I N S T La s t u p d a t e : A p r i l 2 2 , 2 0 2 6 Ci t y o f S c h e r t z , G I S S p e c i a l i s t : B i l l G a r d n e r , g i s @ s c h e r t z . c o m ( 2 1 0 ) 6 1 9 - 1 1 8 5 *T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z p r o v i d e s t h i s G e o g r a p h i c I n f o r m a t i o n S y s t e m p r o d u c t " a s i s " w i t h o u t a n y e x p r e s s o r i m p l i e d w a r r a n t y o f a n y k i n d i n c l u d i n g bu t n o t l i m i t e d t o t h e i m p l i e d w a r r a n t i e s o f m e r c h a n t a b i l i t y a n d f i t n e s s f o r a p a r t i c u l a r p u r p o s e . I n n o e v e n t s h a l l T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z b e l i a b l e fo r a n y s p e c i a l , i n d i r e c t , o r c o n s e q u e n t i a l d a m a g e s o r a n y d a m a g e s w h a t s o e v e r a r i s i n g o u t o f o r i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e u s e o f o r p e r f o r m a n c e o f th e s e m a t e r i a l s . I n f o r m a t i o n p u b l i s h e d i n t h i s p r o d u c t c o u l d i n c l u d e t e c h n i c a l i n a c c u r a c i e s o r t y p o g r a p h i c a l e r r o r s . P e r i o d i c a l c h a n g e s m a y b e ad d e d t o t h e i n f o r m a t i o n h e r e i n . T h e C i t y o f S c h e r t z m a y m a k e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d / o r c h a n g e s i n t h e p r o d u c t ( s ) d e s c r i b e d h e r e i n a t a n y t i m e . * Pr o p o s e d Z o n e C h a n g e 50 6 & 5 0 8 M a i n S t r e e t Ci t y o f S c h e r t z Pa r c e l s 20 0 ' B u f f e r Pr o j e c t B o u n d a r y µ 0 10 0 20 0 50 Fe e t 4Q24 Demographic Report 2.9 3.1 3.1 3.5 3.5 3.3 3.3 3.4 3.7 3.8 01234 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year  Over Year Dec‐24 Dec‐23 2 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.4 3.5 3.7 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p ‐19 No v ‐19 Ja n ‐20 Ma r ‐20 Ma y ‐20 Ju l ‐20 Se p ‐20 No v ‐20 Ja n ‐21 Ma r ‐21 Ma y ‐21 Ju l ‐21 Se p ‐21 No v ‐21 Ja n ‐22 Ma r ‐22 Ma y ‐22 Ju l ‐22 Se p ‐22 No v ‐22 Ja n ‐23 Ma r ‐23 Ma y ‐23 Ju l ‐23 Se p ‐23 No v ‐23 Ja n ‐24 Ma r ‐24 Ma y ‐24 Ju l ‐24 Se p ‐24 No v ‐24 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Dec 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 3 Local Economic Conditions San Antonio International Airport •Broke ground on third terminal at end of 2024 •Estimated total cost = $2.5 billion •Third terminal will anchor the expansion &  improvement project housing as many as 17  new gates spanning approx. 850,000 sq. ft.  •Will include concessions and lounge areas  while housing new Federal Inspection Station  to accommodate expanded international air  service •Expected to generate $3.2 billion in revenue  for the city over 15 years •New ground loading facility also added at  Terminal A including new passenger gates and  overnight aircraft parking •The third terminal is scheduled for completion  in 2028 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 18,503 19,046 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q4 2015Q4 2016Q4 2017Q4 2018Q4 2019Q4 2020Q4 2021Q4 2022Q4 2023Q4 2024Q4 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings Source:  Zonda San Antonio New Home Starts & Closings Key Trends Starts:  +26% YOY  / +6% QOQ Closings:  +4% YOY / +6% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 543 Homes 6 SCUC ISD Housing Market Analysis Average New vs. Existing Home Sale Price, 2013 - 2024 • The average new home sale price in SCUC ISD has risen 54% between 2014 and 2024, an increase of more than $135,200 • The average existing home sale price in SCUC ISD has risen 85% in the last 10 years, an increase of more than $158,800 Avg New Home Avg Existing Home 2014 $250,897 $187,097  2015 $262,532 $181,881  2016 $284,037 $189,189  2017 $297,182 $197,710  2018 $328,762 $221,637  2019 $314,299 $234,868  2020 $318,065 $247,691  2021 $345,858 $257,537  2022 $431,606 $327,526  2023 $422,149 $333,286  2024 $386,156 $345,921  $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 New Home Price Existing Home Price 7 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –4Q24 * Based on additional Zonda Education housing research Rank District Name Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1NORTHSIDE ISD (BEXAR) 3,739 3,920 1,909 6,114 21,246 2COMAL ISD 2,691 3,028 1,670 4,843 21,591 3MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,377 2,410 1,232 5,228 27,810 4EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,513 2,230 1,243 4,351 24,478 5SOUTHWEST ISD 1,301 1,328 628 2,269 7,296 6 JUDSON ISD 615 899 207 547 871 7SCUC ISD 787 894 391 2,113 5,896 8NAVARRO ISD 841 832 453 1,290 6,635 9 BOERNE ISD 777 761 497 1,545 9,427 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 700 730 322 927 16,702 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 656 589 407 854 6,164 12 NORTH EAST ISD 397 361 234 906 5,196 13 SEGUIN ISD 325 342 204 668 5,384 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 300 238 164 86 790 15 MARION ISD 230 174 139 327 4,559 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 116 137 49 227 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 59 87 126 305 772 18 LYTLE ISD 91 76 44 319 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 54 61 25 72 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 3 41 8 15 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 8 District New Home Starts and Closings Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 161 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 214 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 773 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 898 9 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Elementary Annual  Starts Quarter  Starts Annual  Closings Quarter  Closings Under  Const.Inventory Vacant   Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 76 11 123 30 13 33 118 36 GREEN VALLEY00000 0 00 PASCHAL 10321 141242 ROSE GARDEN 234 64 230 53 85 137 827 2,499 SCHERTZ 0 0210 0 1 060 SIPPEL 298 70 277 68 76 154 729 1,817 WATTS 47 7 80 20 8 16 15 580 WIEDERSTEIN 131 9 160 41 13 49 383 662 Grand Total 787 161 894 214 196 391 2,113 5,896 Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category • The district has 23 actively building subdivisions • Within SCUC ISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning • Of these, groundwork is underway on more than 500 lots within 6 subdivisions • 462 lots were delivered in the 4 th quarter 10 District Housing Overview Mont Blanc • 100 total future lots • Preliminary plat approved Jan 2023 • Groundwork underway on all lots 11 Residential Activity Homestead • 1,470 total lots • 783 future lots • 296 vacant developed lots • 20 homes under construction • 339 homes occupied • Started 66 homes in last 12 months; started 16 homes in 4Q24 • Equipment on site for 62 lots in Phase 11 • $400K - $700K January 24, 2025 12 Residential Activity Saddle Creek Ranch • 807 total lots • 36 future lots • 61 vacant developed lots • 7 homes under construction • 690 homes occupied • Closed 61 homes in last 12 months; closed 16 homes in 2Q24 • Groundwork underway on remaining lots • $290K+ Grace Valley – Cibolo Farms • 331 total lots • 186 future lots • 124 vacant developed lots • 17 homes under construction • First homes started 4Q24 • Lennar January 24, 2025 13 Residential Activity Grace Valley • 868 total lots • 557 future lots • 163 vacant developed lots • 16 homes under construction • 128 homes occupied • Closed 123 homes in last 12 months; closed 32 homes in 4Q24 • Groundwork underway on 111 lots in Phase 3A • Lennar • $237K+ January 24, 2025 14 Residential Activity Venado Crossing • 507 total lots • 311 future lots • 15 vacant developed lots • 8 homes under construction • 165 homes occupied • Closed 48 homes in last 12 months; closed 20 homes in 4Q24 • Groundwork underway on 61 lots in Phase 4 • $350K+ Steele Creek • 940 total lots • 335 future lots • 118 vacant developed lots • 1 home under construction • 474 homes occupied • Closed 98 homes in last 12 months; closed 25 homes in 4Q24 • Delivered 111 lots for homebuilding in 4Q24 • DR Horton • $365K+ 15 Residential Activity Saddlebrook Ranch • 635 total lots • 335 future lots • 287 vacant developed lots • 12 homes under construction • Started first homes 3Q24 • Delivered 132 lots for homebuilding in Phase 4 & 5 in 4Q24 • Ashton Woods • $362K+ January 24, 2025 16 Residential Activity Crossvine • 1,017 total lots • 168 future lots • 291 vacant developed lots • 19 homes under construction • 516 homes occupied • Started 56 homes in last 12 months; started 15 homes in 4Q24 • $400K+ Clearwater Creek • 1,156 total future lots • Prelim plat Phase 1 (104 lots) approved April 2022 • Groundwork underway on Phase 1 • Lennar 17 Residential Activity January 24, 2025 18 Housing Market Trends: Multi‐family market‐December 2024 • There are 618 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes • There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district 19 District Multifamily Overview 20 Multi‐Family Activity January 24, 2025 Aviator 1518 • 300 apartment units under construction • Groundwork started early 2024 • Estimated lease date late spring 2025 21 Multi‐Family Activity Schertz Station • 318 single-family rental homes under construction • Groundwork started July 2024 • Estimated lease date August 2025 January 24, 2025 • There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district • The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 22 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 23 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 24 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12) 827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13) 862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14) 937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15) 985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16) 989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17) 995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18) 1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19) 982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20) 1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21) 951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22) 935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23) 819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24) 788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25) 739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26) 699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27) 763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28) 750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29) 776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz‐Cibolo‐U City ISD KG  Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 25 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten  Year  Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.) EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total  Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 ‐369 ‐2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 ‐375 ‐2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 ‐200 ‐1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 ‐107 ‐0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 ‐221 ‐1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 ‐209 ‐1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 ‐172 ‐1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 ‐197 ‐1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 ‐63 ‐0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 ‐89 ‐0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 ‐165 ‐1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 ‐41 ‐0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 ‐50.0% 26 Ten  Year  Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus  Functional  Capacity Max  Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change ‐4.17%‐3.35%‐1.80%‐1.18% 0.72% 1.06% 2.22%1.44% 1.75% 1.72% 1.91% Elementary Absolute Change ‐213 ‐164 ‐85 ‐55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%‐0.40%‐3.73%‐2.61%‐4.69%‐5.02%‐3.97% 2.48% 2.85% 0.47% 2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 ‐9 ‐83 ‐56 ‐98 ‐100 ‐75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change ‐4.01%‐2.01% 4.31%‐0.96%‐3.96%‐2.68%‐4.73%‐4.73%‐4.02% 2.43% 2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change ‐98 ‐47 99 ‐23 ‐94 ‐61 ‐105 ‐100 ‐81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92% 2.07%‐2.72%‐1.38%‐0.24%‐1.59% 0.25%‐1.95%‐4.30%‐3.68%‐4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 ‐152 ‐75 ‐13 ‐85 13 ‐103 ‐222 ‐182 ‐203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change ‐1.32%‐0.72%‐1.49%‐1.43%‐1.19%‐1.38%‐0.45%‐0.64%‐1.19%‐0.30%‐0.04% District Absolute Change ‐200 ‐107 ‐221 ‐209 ‐172 ‐197 ‐63 ‐89 ‐165 ‐41 ‐5 27 Key Takeaways   Annual closings near 900 in 2024 Housing market remains cloudy with continued  high interest rates  and looming tariffs   The district has more than 390 homes currently in  inventory and more than 2,100 vacant developed  lots available for builders Groundwork is underway on approx. 500 lots  within 6 subdivisions Schertz‐Cibolo‐Universal City ISD is forecasted to  enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (C URRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Memo To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Daisy Marquez, Senior Planner From: John Nowak, P.E., Engineer Date: April 22, 2026 Re: Traffic Impact Summary for Proposed Zone Change for 502, 506, and 508 Main Street The properties at 502, 506, and 508 Main Street are currently zoned GB, General Business. The property owner is requesting MSMU, Zoning, a specific zoning district for the Main Street corridor. The properties are currently fully developed and no change of uses are expected with the zone change request. Therefore, there is no increase or decrease in expected traffic generation associated with this zone change request. As such, there is no adverse impact to the City’s transportation system by the zone change request. Ord. 26-S-13 Proposed 0.4 ac Zone Change to MSMU Daisy Marquez| Senior Planner 42 Zoning Use Subject Property General Business District Office North Right of Way Main St South Railroad Union Pacific East Right of Way 1st Street West General Business District (GB) Restaurant/ Melanie’s Cafe •0.4 acres •Current Zoning: GB •Proposed: MSMU •Platted: Main Street Business Park 43 Dimensional Requirements 21.5.7 Permitted Uses 21.5.8 Existing Proposed General Business District (GB)Main Street Mixed-Use (MSMU) Permitted Uses *Not a Comprehensive List Appliances, Furniture and Home Furnishing Store; Building Material and Hardware Sales; Car Wash, Automated ; Commercial Amusement, Indoor Antique Shop, Parking Garage, Bakery, Bank, Book Store, Day Care Center, Dance Hall/ Nightclub, gymnastics studio, Health/ Fitness, Medical/ Professional Office/ Clinic Area Square Feet 10,000 5,000 Width & Depth 100 x 100 50x100 Setbacks, Adj. Non- Residential Front: 20’, Side: NA, Rear: NA Front:10, Side:5, Rear:10 Maximum Height 120’35’ Maximum Impervious Coverage 80%80% 44 •17 Public notices were sent on 04.23.2026 •As of today •(1) in Favor •(0) Neutral to •(0) in Opposition •A public hearing notice was published in the “San Antonio Express” on May 13, 2026 •2 notification signs were placed by the applicant •P&Z: May 6, 2026 45 46 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Main Street- Future Land Use Designation •Single-Family and Multi-Family Residential •Low-Intensity Commercial •Proposed MSMU: •Consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Map- Future Land Use Map Designation. •Appropriate with surrounding uses. 47 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Proposed MSMU: •Property on Main St. •Engineering Memo •No proposed change in use, property is developed already. •No adverse impact to the City’s transportation system. 48 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Property is on Main Street and within the Main Street Corridor •Along Main Street: Offices, personal services, restaurants, etc. •MSMU Permitted Uses: •Consistent and appropriate with existing uses along Main Street and in immediate area. 49 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. UDC SECTION 21.5.4.D Criteria for Approval •Schertz Fire, EMS, and PD do not have objections to the proposed zone change. •SCUC ISD was mailed a public hearing notice. •P&Z held a public hearing for this item on May 6, 2026. 50 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Ord. 26-S-13 due to the location of the subject property on Main Street, the compatibility of the proposed zone change with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan Future Land Use Map, and the existing uses in the immediate area. P&Z Recommendation: The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing for the item on May 6, 2026, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 7-0 vote. Agenda No. 18.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:June 2, 2026 Department:Engineering Subject:June 2026 Major Projects in Progress/CIP Attachments June 2026 Projects in Progress Informational Only CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: June 2, 2026 Department: City Manager Subject: Update on Major Projects in Progress Background This is the monthly update on large projects that are in progress or in the planning process. This update is being provided so Council will be up to date on the progress of these large projects. If Council desires more information on any project or on projects not on this list, please reach out to staff and that information will be provided. Facilities Projects: 1. Fleet Building Parking Lot Project Description – Pave the open grassy area located at 27 Commercial Place o Project Status: Site Plan Development and Construction Design o Projected Completion: To be determined o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: To be determined Project Update: This project is being pushed back to FY26-27 due to the need to reallocate funding from this project to help fund the repairs of the retention wall and pavers at the Schertz Library. In the interim, Public Works has started grading a small area of the lot to provide additional improved surface for parking and storage of vehicles and equipment in order to comply with the City’s regulations regarding the use of unimproved surfaces. 2. Library Retention Wall (Pavers) Project Description – Replacing the failing plastic panels around the library foundation with concrete panels. This includes removal and replacement of some of the concrete pavers in the rear courtyard. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: $350,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineering o Contractor: To be determined Project Update: The bid package is being finalized, and Staff expects to bid the project this month. 3. Fire Station 4 Project Description – Fire Station 4 Build o Project Status: Full building and development phase. Footing and building beams have been poured. Working through power, technology, water, and sewer to building o Projected Completion: March 2027 o Total Project Cost: Estimated $13.25 million o Building Cost: Estimated $10 million o Consultant: AGCM – Owner Rep o Architect: Martinez Architecture o Contractor: Marksman – CMAR Project Update: Concrete has been poured. Once left dry for at least 2 full days, steel will go up. Presently looking at 4/28, Tuesday of next week. CPS Power has been completed and temporary power to the job site has been established. We are now in the process of getting fiber run from source to site. IT is managing this project. Next will be completion of gas lines to the building through Centerpoint. Water and sewer have been tapped to lines across Wiederstein and Fire Line was tested. 4. FM 78 Build Out PD CID Property Room Project Description – Remodel a portion of the County Building that PD will utilize for CID and Property o Project Status: Approved by the County o Projected Completion: TBD o Consultant: TBD o Contractor: TBD Project Update: An internal estimate, prepared with support from an owner's representative, placed the project cost between $530,000 and $560,000, which is $1.4 million less than the Parkhill proposal. City staff will present a resolution to the City Council recommending the rejection of all proposals and rebidding the project under a Design-Build delivery model. The decision to switch to a Design-Build framework aims to better integrate the design and construction phases and streamline project management. Staff has also agreed to engage an owner's representative to oversee the project and protect the city's interests at an estimated cost of $67K, thus, we are requesting a CIP increase of $250K for a total estimated project cost of $650K. 5. Police Department Building Remodel Project Description – Remodel office areas within building #6 where the Police Department operates. Areas to remodel may include the current CIS division, P&E holding area, and possibly other offices along that hallway. o Project Status: Once the FM 78 project is nearing completion, we can move forward. o Projected Completion: TBD o Consultant: TBD o Contractor: TBD Project Update: In a holding status until administrative tasks with the FM 78 build out for the property room and CID are completed. Drainage Projects: 1. FM 78 South Channel Silt Removal Project Description – Silt removal for the existing FM 78 South Drainage channel to include permitting, easement acquisition and construction. o Project Status: Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Spring 2027 o Project Cost: Design $32,100, Drainage Report $4,600 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Unintech has indicated that the surveyors are working to clear up some boundary discrepancies to finalize the easement exhibits. Once complete the easement negotiations will begin. After easements are acquired, the project will be rebid, and construction will proceed. 2. Pickrell Park & FM 1518 Drainage Project Description – Installation of underground drainage, upgraded creek outfalls and provide localized surface drainage swales. Sanitary sewer relocation within areas of conflict with proposed drainage improvements o Project Status: Preliminary Engineering Study o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: $41,987 - $47,500 NTE (study only) o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: No Change - Staff has reviewed the preliminary study and has provided comments back to Unintech. Unintech is working to include these comments and will meet with staff when complete to finalize the report. Recommendations from the study will be used to develop a project to improve the drainage in this area of the City. 3. Wendy Swan Drainage Project Description – Removal of an existing concrete retaining wall, install underground drainage and fill to grade with localized surface drainage. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Design $108,500 ($125,000 NTE), Construction Estimate $1,100,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Staff has received final plans and specifications. Staff is working on obtaining a temporary easement to relocate a property owner’s fence from the park property onto the property owner’s property. 4. Friesenhahn Lift Station Drainage Improvements Project Description – Drainage study of Friesenhahn Lift Station site will be performed and used to develop plans for construction of recommended improvements to remedy poor drainage conditions around the site. o Project Status: Study and Design o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: Design $74,815 Construction Estimate TBD o Consultant: Utility Engineering Group o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Staff has met with UEG to discuss the drainage analysis and ways to improve conditions near the lift station. UEG is working to make revisions discussed, and these will be used in the design phase of the project. Water and Wastewater Projects: 1. Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Interceptor Main and Lift Station Project Description – Design and construction of a sanitary sewer system to collect and convey wastewater to the future CCMA water reclamation plant off Trainer Hale Road in Southern Schertz. The system consists of approximately 19,000 linear feet of 30” gravity wastewater line running generally along Woman Hollering Creek from the existing Sedona lift station on FM 1518 to a new lift station on IH 10 and approximately 6,000 feet of force main from the lift station to CCMA plant. It also includes an additional 18” gravity line approximately 1,500 feet in length that will first serve the Hallie’s Cove Subdivision. The system is necessary for the new CCMA plant to begin operation and to allow the existing Woman Hollering Lift Station at Sedona to be taken out of service. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Engineering/Design $1,187,594, Land purchases, ROW, legal and advertising $700,810, Construction $11,200,000, and miscellaneous costs for a project total of $13,088,404 o Design Engineer: Cobb Fendley & Associates, Inc. o Owner’s Representative: AGCM, Inc. o Contractor: Thalle Construction Co, Inc. Project Update: No change from the last update. The collection and conveyance system including the lift station was put into operation March 3, 2025. The CCMA South Plant is operational. The Woman Hollering Package Treatment Plant has been shut down and is being cleaned and removed from the leased property location. The Sedona Lift Station and the pump and haul operation at Hallie’s Cove have been decommissioned. The contractor continues to work on correction of items identified on the punchlist for the project to be completed. Work remaining includes correction of pump issues, relocation and elevation of main disconnect, crane and crane foundation testing and potential correction. It is estimated that the remainder of the work on the project may still take several months to complete but as stated, the project is operational. 2. Riata Lift Station Relocation Project Description – Relocation of the Riata Lift Station ahead of TxDOT’s IH 35 NEX project to remove it from conflict with the proposed highway improvements. The design phase included identification of a new site for the list station, design of new lift station and design of the abandonment of the existing lift station. Property and easement acquisitions were required. The new lift station is needed to maintain sewer services. o Project Status: Begin Construction 4th Quarter of 2024. o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Acquisition of easements and existing lift station $478,000; Construction: $2,800,000 o Consultant: Utility Engineering Group, PLLC o Contractor: Keystone Construction Project Update: Keystone is working to correct items identified on the final walk punch list. They are waiting on the landscape company to install a couple of trees along the front of the site. Riata Lift Station Location 3. FM 1518 Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT FM 1518 Improvement Project. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: The City’s utility relocation portion of the project is expected to be completed in the Fall of 2026. o Project Cost: Design NTE $980,000, Construction Joint Bid $8,986,837/Aztec 16” Line $884,270 o Consultant: Halff Associates o Contractor: SER Construction Partners (TxDOT’s General Contractor)/Qro Mex Construction (Aztec 16” Line-completed) Project Update: No change since last update. SER has slowed down on the installation of water and sewer on the north end of the project due to CCMA working on their utility relocations within the same area. Once CCMA is completed in the area, SER will resume utility installation. 4. Corbett Ground Storage Tank Project Description – Construction of a new 3-million-gallon Ground Storage Tank (GST). The GST will be used to fill the existing Corbett Elevated Storage Tank and provide additional water storage capacity. This new GST will receive water directly from the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation. o Project Status: Construction Phase o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: Design $547,100, Construction $8,665,220 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers o Contractor: Pesado Construction Co. Project Update: A final walk of the site was done at the end of May to identify items that still need attention prior to closing out the project. Public Works is meeting with the contractor and the electrical engineer to discuss all of the electrical and control components to ensure proper operation of the new pumps, generator, and SSLGC’s inlet controls. 5. Water Loop Lines Project Description – Install 12” water main lines to provide a looped distribution system from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin and Pfeil Road to N Graytown Road. o Project Status: Design/Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: Design NTE $254,974, Construction Estimate $4,400,000 Project Update: Unintech has begun assembling the construction contract documents to begin the bidding process for the section of water line along IH 10 between Pfeil and N. Graytown roads. Advertising and bidding will be done in June. 6. IH 35 NEX-North Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT IH 35 NEX project. o Project Status: Design - Construction o Projected Completion: Joint Bid Construction is planned for Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design & Easement Acquisition Services - $1,250,000 o Project Cost: Construction Sewer Only - $1,787,074 ($2,000,000 NTE) o Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: Blackrock Construction continues the sewer construction effort along IH 35. Halff is working to revise plans of a sewer crossing of IH 35 due to conflicts discovered with other utility providers. This is being coordinated with the contractor, TxDOT, and the other utilities to ensure a change in the vertical alignment does not create any other concerns. Once these plans are approved, Blackrock will continue with the bore to install the sewer line casing. Extent of IH 35 NEX – Northern Segment 7. Robin Hood Way Waterline Replacement Project Description – Replacement and upsizing of water line in Robin Hood Way, Sherlock Lane, and Nottingshire. The main replacement is to increase flows in the area, particularly to meet fire flow requirements. The project also includes street resurfacing and rehabilitation work that was previously removed from the SPAM project. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Spring 2027 o Project Cost: $5,350,000 o Consultant: Kimley- Horn & Associates Project Update: Our consultant is surveying the additional area necessary to finalize the design documents, which will be incorporated into their next submittal. 8. Bell North Sewer Extension Project Description – Ten commercial properties on the west end of Bell North Drive are served by private grinder pumps that pump into a public wastewater force main that discharges into a manhole near 17316 Bell North Drive. This project is the construction of a gravity sewer main within Bell North Drive that will flow toward and discharge into the main on Doerr Lane. o Project Status: 90% Completion o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Design $95,000 o Project Cost: Construction $513,900 ($575,000 NTE) o Consultant: Freeland Turk Engineering Group LLC o Contractor: RL Jones, LP Project Update: RL Jones has installed service laterals connecting individual commercial properties to the newly constructed gravity sewer main. Aside from outstanding punch‑list items, the City is currently coordinating with the remaining businesses that continue to operate on onsite septic systems, which were not identified or included during the original design phase. 9. Northcliffe Country Club Estates Water and Wastewater Main Replacement Project Description – replacement of the water and wastewater mains and rehabilitation of the streets in the Northcliffe Country Club Estates subdivision. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: $8,733,400 (estimated) o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project Update: Final Plans have been received. Staff is reviewing several possible manhole lining options to seal up the existing manholes to help prevent Inflow and Infiltration into the system. 10. Cibolo West Wastewater Trunk Main Project Description – Installation of approximately 21,680 LF of gravity wastewater trunk main that will collect wastewater at the location of the Saddlebrook Wastewater Lift Station as well as areas north of Schaefer Road and convey flows south along a route including along Weir and Trainer Hale Roads and the west side of Cibolo Creek to the CCMA South Water Reclamation Plant. Having this line in place will ultimately allow the decommissioning of the Corbett and Saddlebrook Lift Stations. The project is a collaboration between the City of Schertz and Green Valley Special Utility District (GVSUD). o Project Status: Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Total Project Cost: $26,743,000 o Consultant for Route Study: Lockwood, Andrews, & Newnam, Inc. o Consultant for Easement Acquisition: TBD Project Update: No change from last update. Staff plans to present the results of the route study to Council in the coming months. After that, work will begin on the next phase of this project – easement acquisition. The scope will include a preliminary design to further refine the specific route of the trunk main in order to identify the necessary easements. 11. Elevated Storage Tank Pipe Replacement and Tank Painting Project Description – Rehabilitation of vertical fill and drain line piping in the East Live Oak and Northcliffe elevated storage tanks due to increased signs of fatigue at the welded joints. The project also includes the painting of the interior and exterior of the East Live Oak and Northcliffe elevated tanks and the Ware Seguin ground storage tank. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Design expected to be complete by Fall 2026. o Total Project Cost: $2,600,000 Estimated Total o Consultant for Study: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project Update: No change from previous update. The inspection of the tanks and final report is complete. Samples from the pipes have been analyzed and replacement pipe selection is currently under review. Replacement pipe material is being evaluated so the most cost-effective material is selected. 12. Schertz Parkway 16” Water Transmission Main Replacement Project Description – Replacement of approximately 1,200 linear feet of 16” water transmission main along Schertz Parkway between Mare Way and Maske Road. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Winter 2026 o Project Cost: Design $180,824 ($245,000 NTE), Easements $50,000, Construction Estimate $1,500,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Final plans have been received. Consultant is still working to obtain the required construction easement for the new waterline. Project is waiting until easement is acquired before bidding. Staff is processing a task order for appraisal services to move the easement forward. 13. FM 3009 18” Water Transmission Main Replacement Project Description – Replacement of approximately 7,600 linear feet of 18” water transmission main. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design $431,752 ($550,000 NTE), Construction Estimate (including easement acquisition) $4,800,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Unintech is finalizing the preliminary plans. Additional survey information needed to be collected after reviewing the initial survey and the layout of the new line. Expect plan to be submitted in early June. 14. IH 35 Ground Storage Tank and Pump Station Project Description – Construction of a 3-million-gallon ground storage tank and pump station adjacent to the existing IH 35 elevated storage tank to provide storage capacity that can be filled during non-peak hours of the day. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design $728,068 ($800,000 NTE), Construction Estimate (including land acquisition $13,750,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Staff met with Unintech to discuss the engineering report and proposed operation of a new storage tank and associated pumps. To try to reduce the operating pressure needed for the new pumps, it has been recommended to install a larger transmission main between the Morning Drive site and the Columbia elevated tank. This should reduce the horsepower required for the new pumps while allowing public works the flexibility to take these other tanks offline for maintenance while maintaining system operations. 15. Lift Station Decommissioning Project Description – Decommissioning of Elbel and Whisper Branch Lift Stations including regulatory documentation and physical demolition and abandonment. The project also includes the development of a lift station decommissioning standard guidance document that can be used by the City for future lift station decommissioning projects. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: Design $49,635 Construction Estimate TBD o Consultant: Utility Engineering Group o Contractor: TBD Project Update: No change since last update. UEG is working on the preliminary design for the decommissioning and a draft of the guidance document. Staff has provided some decommissioning needs of the electrical components at each site. A submittal is expected from UEG within the next few weeks. Street Projects: 1. Main Street Improvements Project Project Description – The project will improve sidewalks, provide street lighting, way-finding signage, landscaping, utility relocations, and architectural elements such as decorative concrete, decorative lighting, screening, and area signage. This project will also replace aging water and sanitary sewer mains and reconstruct the street with a new, stronger pavement section. Additionally, Lindbergh between Main and Exchange will be reconstructed. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2028 o Project Cost: $25,880,893 o Consultant: Kimley- Horn Associates Project Update: No change from last update. Our consultant is doing additional outreach to the utility companies in the project area to finalize some details. 2. Lookout Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project involves reconstruction of Lookout Road from Schertz Parkway to Doerr Lane. A traffic signal at the Lookout Road/Schertz Parkway intersection will also be installed. The project also includes the replacement and upsizing the existing sanitary sewer main in Lookout Road from Doerr Lane to Schertz Parkway. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design $571,000 ($20,000 from Selma), Construction estimate $6,738,092 ($100,000 from Selma) o Design Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: Final documents are being prepared to close on the Right-of-Way acquisitions form CAT and Republic National Distributing. A project design amendment is being created to shift the alignment of Schertz Parkway to the east to avoid any impacts, or Right-of-Way acquisition, from the Blue Bonnet Palace. Once the design amendment has been approved, the final plan revisions will be performed. This will complete the bid package, and a bid schedule will be developed for the project. 3. Lower Seguin Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project will reconstruct a 2.9-mile segment of Lower Seguin Road to widen and improve the street to the section identified in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The City intends to pursue Federal DCIP funding for project construction. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2028 o Project Cost: $18,200,000 o Consultant: Halff & Associates Project Update: Work is underway on revising our DCIP application for the project. The Base Commander support letter for the application has been sent to the Commander’s office for his signature. Our revised DCIP application will be submitted later this month. Project plans continue to be refined. The Right-of-Way and Easement acquisition for the project is underway. 4. Buffalo Valley South Resurfacing and Rehabilitation and Utility Replacements Project Description – Water and sanitary sewer main replacements and street rehabilitation of Buffalo Valley South, specifically Mill Street, 1st St, 2nd St, Bowman St, Lee St, Church St, Zuehl St, and Wuest. PCI data was used to select the streets in the project. Project will be funded with a combination of SPAM funding (for the street rehabilitation) and ARP funding for the utility replacement. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: April 16 (Substantial Completion) o Project Cost: $5,977,000 o Design Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineering o Contractor: E-Z Bel Construction, LLC Project Update: The contractor has been working on punch list items and final project clean-up and sodding. The recent rains have caused some things to be delayed, but the project is expected to be fully complete by the end of this month. 5. Boenig Drive Reconstruction Project Description – Reconstruction of Boenig Drive between Ware Seguin Road and Graytown Road. The reconstruction includes reconfiguration of the intersection with Ware Seguin Road to improve efficiencies and eliminate having two street intersections side-by side on Ware Seguin Road. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Spring 2027 o Project Cost: $3,240,000 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. Project Update: No change from last update. The design is nearly fully complete. Staff and our consultant are working to resolve a couple utility conflicts with the utility providers. Staff expects to bid the project this Summer. 6. 2024 SPAM Rehabilitation Project Description – Rehabilitation of St. Andrews, Maple, and part of the Silvertree Subdivision streets. Rehabilitation involves removing the existing pavement, applying cement stabilizing to the material underneath, and placing a new layer of pavement on the street. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: $3,581,000 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates o Contractor: E-Z Bel Construction, LLC Project Update: The majority of the concrete work has been completed in Dove Meadows. Some of the re-vegetation and other cleanup has also been completed in Dove Meadows. Concrete replacement is underway on Maple Drive. The recent rains have caused some delays in some of the work, but the project is expected to be completed in July. 7. 2025 SPAM Resurfacing Project Description – Resurfacing of the streets in the Ashley Woods, Woodbridge, and Rio Vista subdivisions. Resurfacing involves performing localized concrete repairs; base repairs; asphalt level up; crack sealing; and applying a slurry seal to the surface of the streets. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: $1,282,231 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: Final Plan review and adjustments are underway. The bid package is expected to be complete and bidding started by the end of the Month. 8. Kramer Farm Rehabilitation Project Description – Rehabilitation of the western streets in Kramer Farm Subdivision. Rehabilitation involves removing the existing pavement, applying cement stabilizing to the material underneath, and placing a new layer of pavement on the street. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: $1,446,582 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: Final Plan review and adjustments are underway. The bid package is expected to be complete and bidding started by the end of the Month. 9. 2026 SPAM Resurfacing Project Description – resurfacing of the streets in the Fairway Ridge; Woodland Oaks; and Horseshoe Oaks Subdivisions. The project also includes the TSAC-recommended crosswalk improvements. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: $1,780,000 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: Staff is working with our consultant to refine the plans and modify the project scope to stay within budget. We expect to have the revisions completed and the bid package completed by the end of the month. 10. Savannah Drive Overlay Project Description – Resurfacing of Savannah Drive from the Selma City Limits to FM 3009. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Fall 2026 o Project Cost: $1,460,000 o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: In coordination with the TSAC crosswalk and the Dietz Creek Trail project, there will be some plan changes for this project. Our consultant is working on the plan changes and expect to have the revisions completed by the end of the month. 11. FM 3009 Overpass Project Description – TxDOT project for overpass construction at the FM 3009/FM 78 intersection to elevate the main lanes of FM 3009 over the railroad tracks and FM 78. On and off ramps will be provided so vehicles can travel between FM 3009 and FM 78 at the intersection. The project includes some improvements to FM 78 to improve operational efficiencies of the on and off ramps. o Project Status: Schematic Design and Environmental Clearance o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: $100,000,000 (TxDOT) o Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: No change from last update. In response to our request for some additional information on the project, TXDOT provided a copy of a PowerPoint presentation they did at an earlier open house meeting they conducted. According to one of the slides, TXDOT indicated they would be holding some additional public meeting on the project this Summer. We don’t have a schedule for these meetings yet, but once we do, we will provide Council and our residents with that information. Parks & Recreation Projects: 1. Schertz Soccer Complex Irrigation Water Storage Project Project Description – Upgrading electrical components, upsizing well pump and piping, and adding storage capacity for irrigation of the Schertz Soccer Complex. o Project Status: Under Construction o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: $200,000 (estimated total) o Consultant: Unintech Engineering o Contractor: Kutscher Drilling and Specified Water Systems Project Update: No Updates: Bids for the storage tank were received and Specified Water Systems will provide and install a 12,000-gallon tank, concrete pad, with plumbing connections. The project is pending scheduling installation. I.T. Projects: 1. Asset Management- Work Order System – Open Gov Project Description- Replace the current work order and asset management systems o Project Status: In progress o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: Approximately $470,000 o Contractor: Open Gov Project Update: The sandbox test environment was released to staff in Parks, Streets, and Drainage to begin practicing in. Staff completed the train-the-trainer event scheduled during the week of April 28- 30, 2026. Parks, Street, and Drainage staff is currently working in the sandbox test environment and scheduled for weekly Q&A sessions from May 18th through July 10th. Studies and Plans: 1. Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Update Project Description – Update to City’s Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Program. o Project Status: Study o Projected Completion: Schedule Pending o Total Project Cost: $149,460 ($170,000 NTE) o Consultant for Study: Kimley-Horn Associates Project Update: Final tweaks are being made to the MTP. Construction costs and fee determination is underway. The draft fee report is expected to be completed in a couple of weeks. Staff is in the process of scheduling public outreach meeting during July. Two public meetings are being planned; one development meeting; and one EDC meeting as an outreach effort. The required audit is also underway. Meetings with Planning and Zoning and CIAC are being determined. The goal is to have adoption of the fee schedule to Council in October. 2. Southern Schertz Interim Sewer Service Study Project Description – Until the completion of expansion of the CCMA South Water Reclamation Plant, treatment capacity in southern Schertz is severely limited. This project is a study to identify potential short-term and long-term sewer service treatment options for the City’s southern service area. o Project Status: Study o Projected Completion: Schedule Pending o Total Project Cost: $59,695 o Consultant for Study: Utility Engineering Group Project Update: No change from previous update. Staff and the consultant continue to evaluate the potential for retrofitting existing systems to function in an interim capacity. The consultant submitted a technical memo with one of the options for interim capacity (temporary package treatment plant) for staff to review. Staff is contacting the owner of a property with potential for placement of a package plant. 3. Regional Flood Planning A Master Drainage Plan for the City of Schertz has been selected as one of the top projects recommended for funding and performance by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB) through the Flood Management Evaluation (FME) program. A kickoff meeting for the plan is scheduled with AECOM, the consultant that will be preparing the FME, at the end of May. TxDOT Roadway Projects: Note: If links do not work, please contact engineering@schertz.com 1. FM 1103 Improvement Project: Construction officially began in November 2022 and was originally expected to be complete in fall 2026. Minor progress is being made on the roadway while utility relocation continues. General project updates are available by signing up at this link: FM 1103 Construction Newsletter 2. FM 1518 Improvement Project: SER Construction, LLC, formally began construction on April 9, 2024. The contractor has leased property owned by the City on Schaefer Road to stage construction activities. The first few months of the project will be mainly underground utility construction and will mostly take place outside travel lanes. While there may be some delays, major traffic disruptions should not be experienced much during this phase of the project. The project is currently anticipated to be completed in 2028. Updates regarding the FM 1518 project are available by visiting and subscribing at the following link: FM 1518 Expansion 3. IH-35 NEX (I-410 South to FM 1103): The central segment of the I-35 Northeast Expansion project continues with Alamo NEX Construction handling the design-build project. The central section runs from 410 N to FM 3009. Utility coordination work for the northern segment of the project is underway. TxDOT consultants have met with Public Works and Engineering Staff to begin establishing relocation needs. The City will be reimbursed for the costs of all relocations needed except for any upsizing or improvements above current conditions. Updates about the project can be obtained by signing up at the following link: I 35 NEX Project Updates 4. IH-10 Graytown Road to Guadalupe County Line: Work for the widening of the main lanes and utility relocations continues. Work on the FM 1518 bridge over IH 10 continues and will involve numerous episodes of the rerouting of traffic including shifting lanes and detours as necessary. Updates regarding the IH 10 project are available by signing up at the following link: IH 10 Expansion Information