Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
2010R15-ETJ Agreement with San Antonio IH 10
RESOLUTION NO. 10-R-15 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into an agreement with the City of San Antonio pursuant to the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "ETJ Agreement") regarding the release by San Antonio of certain land to the extraterritorial jurisdiction of the City. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the ETJ Agreement with the City of San Antonio in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. 50307024.1 PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 30th day of March, 2010. CITY OF SC RT ,TEXAS Mayor A``T~TEST: - i~ l City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50307024.1 EXHIBIT A EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT See attached 50307024.1 A-1 CITY OF SAN ANTONIO CITY OF SCHERTZ EXTRATERRITORIAL JURISDICTION AGREEMENT This Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Agreement is effective on the date set forth in Article V hereof (this "Agreement") and is entered into by and between the City of San Antonio, a Texas municipal corporation ("San Antonio"), acting by and through its City Manager pursuant to Ordinance No. ,and the City of Schertz, a Texas municipal corporation ("Schertz"), acting by and through its City Manager pursuant to Resolution No. 10-R-15. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Schertz has requested that San Antonio release from its extraterritorial jurisdiction an area of approximately 3,486 acres (5.5 square miles) (the Transferred Property described below) so that it may incorporate such area into the extraterritorial jurisdiction of Schertz; and WHEREAS, incorporation of this area into the extraterritorial jurisdiction of Schertz would allow Schertz to exercise jurisdiction over the Transferred Property; and WHEREAS, both municipalities are desirous of entering into this Agreement to permit this arrangement; THE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: I. General Terms and Conditions A. San Antonio releases from its extraterritorial jurisdiction and relinquishes control over an area containing approximately 3,486 acres of land located north of I-10 East, south of Lower Seguin Road, east of FM 1518 and west of the Bexar County boundary line with Guadalupe County (Cibolo Creek) and more particularly described by metes and bounds and the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein for all purposes ("Transferred Property"). San Antonio shall take such further and additional action as Schertz may reasonably request to evidence the release of the Transferred Property from its extraterritorial jurisdiction. B. Schertz will promptly incorporate the Transferred Property into its extraterritorial jurisdiction. (San Antonio acknowledges that, by law, a portion of the Transferred Property will not be included in Schertz's extraterritorial jurisdiction until the annexation proceedings described in I.C.7(a) below have been completed.) C. Upon bringing the Transferred Property into its extraterritorial jurisdiction, Schertz agrees that it will do the following: 1. Extend a land use plan to the Transferred Property similar to San Antonio's IH-10 East Perimeter Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein for all purposes, allowing for low 50306808.2 impact commercial uses with a mix ofmulti-family, agriculture, and open space; 2. Prohibit new billboards from being erected on the Transferred Property except in accordance with the City's Unified Development Code (the "Schertz's UDC"); 3. Extend aMajor/Minor Thoroughfare Plan conforming to San Antonio's Major Thoroughfare Plan for the area, but with the following right-of--way widths: FM 1518 -120' of ROW Extension of FM 3009 and Weir Rd -120' of ROW Trainer Hale Rd - 86' of ROW; 4. Extend Schertz's subdivision regulations to the Transferred Property in accordance with the Schertz UDC; 5. Extend Schertz's tree ordinance to the Transferred Property, which must protect existing significant and heritage trees, in accordance with Schertz's UDC; 6. Extend Schertz's landscape ordinance to the Transferred Property, which must require planting of additional trees in new commercial and residential developments, in accordance with Schertz's UDC; 7. (a) Start annexation proceedings as to the portion of the Transferred Property described on Exhibit C and incorporated herein for all purposes and prosecute such proceedings diligently to conclusion; (b) As other portions of the Transferred Property develop as residential subdivisions or commercial property in accordance with the land use plan described in I.C.1 above (each, a "Development") and Schertz extends water and wastewater service to such Development or the developer thereof constructs water and wastewater facilities serving such Development to be connected to Schertz's water and wastewater services, commence annexation proceedings as to such Development (subject to such Development being contiguous to Schertz's then existing corporate boundary) and prosecute such proceedings diligently to conclusion; 8. Provide services and regulations to the Transferred Property as required by Chapter 43 of the Texas Local Government Code; and 9. Contribute an amount equal to 50% of sales tax revenue collected in the Transferred Property to San Antonio beginning upon the effective date of 50306808.2 2 the first annexation of land within the Transferred Property and continuing for a period of 10 years. D. The Transferred Property shall revert back to San Antonio's extraterritorial jurisdiction automatically, without action by either party, if Schertz fails to begin the annexation proceedings described in I.C.7(a) above by December 31, 2010. In addition, once Schertz has begun such annexation proceedings, if it fails to prosecute such proceedings diligently to a conclusion, the City of San Antonio has the right to re-enter the Transferred Property, taking it back into San Antonio's extraterritorial jurisdiction by filing a written declaration of re-entry in the Official Records of Real Property of Bexar County, Texas. If a court rules that Schertz cannot annex the property described in I.C.7(a) above, then the Transferred Property shall revert back to San Antonio's extraterritorial jurisdiction automatically, without action by either party. E. Schertz shall file for record a copy of this Agreement for each tract of land within the Transferred Property affected by this Agreement in the Real Property Records of Bexar County, Texas. II. Severability A. If for any reason, any one or more paragraphs of this Agreement is held invalid, such determination shall not affect, impair, or invalidate the remaining paragraphs of this Agreement but shall be confined in its operation to the specific sections, sentences, clauses, or parts of this Agreement held invalid, and invalidity of any section, sentence, clause, or parts shall not affect, impair, or prejudice in any way the validity of the remainder of this Agreement in any instance. B. This Agreement and the exhibits to this Agreement supersede any and all other prior or contemporaneous agreements, oral or written, among the parties with respect to the matters addressed in this Agreement. III. Applicable Law This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. IV. Notices Any notice, request, demand, report, certificate, or other instrument which may be required or permitted to be furnished to or served upon the parties shall be deemed sufficiently given or furnished or served if in writing and deposited in the United States mail, registered or certified, return receipt required, addressed to such party at the address set forth below or such other address as may be hereafter designated by either party by written notice to the other party. 50306808.2 3 IF TO THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO: City of San Antonio Planning and Development Services Department Attn: Director 1901 S. Alamo, 2nd Floor San Antonio, Texas 78204 With a copy to: City of San Antonio Office of the City Clerk Office of the City Attorney Attn: City Clerk Attn: City Attorney City Hall, 2nd Floor City Hall, 3rd Floor P.O. Box 839966 P.O. Box 839966 San Antonio, Texas 78283-3966 San Antonio, Texas 78283-3966 IF TO THE CITY OF SCHERTZ: City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attn: City Manager With a copy to: Fulbright & Jaworski L.L.P. Attn: Michael Spain 300 Convent Street, Suite 2200 San Antonio, Texas 78205 V. Effective Date This Agreement is effective on the effective date of the later of the Ordinance of the City of San Antonio and the Resolution of the City of Schertz authorizing this Agreement, in each case as indicated by the date following the signature of each City Manager below. [Remainder of page intentionally left blank.] 50306808.2 4 IN WITNESS OF WHICH this Agreement has been executed in triplicate. CITY OF SCHERTZ By: Title: City Manager Date: ~o~~ STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § This instrument was acknowledged before me on~~ 2010, by Don E. Taylor, City Manager of the City of Schertz, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ati ~ . BRENDr1 L. STAAB Notary Public, State of Texas I* Mr COMMISSION ExPIRES y p _ ~ N©VBMBER 3, 2010 M Commission ex fires: . '1 l 50306808.2 CITY OF S T By: .S Att Title: ~ ~/~aGi~"u-a ~ Title: ~ Date: JL' Jr' ~0/~ STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF BEXAR § This stru ent was ackno ledged before me on ' ' ~ 1 ~ by ~ ~ ity Manager of the City of San Antonio, a Texas municipal corporation, on beh if of said corporation. 'epa~a~~. a ~~pp~~1w `,C v~~ A Gis o~ ~~+tll~ 9/YYGL~~ fit: ~VB~IC Notary Public, State of Texas ~ 51'A'YE 'CEXAS 1 Mp Comm, fig, O'i•~4~~011 My Commission expires: ~1 D`~~' 50306808.2 EXHIBIT A Transferred Property See attached 50306808.2 A-1 GBOlO G~'! UMRS c n l \ gORDIpNANCE N0. 77.63 ACRES o ~ APPROVED RlL 21 1987 J j P o / ~ ~ ~~i 3486.4 ACRES ; ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ l ~ ~ N DOggRgDIgqNANggCE ND. ~ ~ ~ 8~ ~ gip3piR5.p1y~E9 ACRES ~ I ~ L JULY 1 988 ~ J ~~0$ < L ism o ism wm ism mm ism o000 SCALE: t" =3000 FEET CITY O~ SCHERTZ, TEXAS PROPOSED SCHERTZ ETJ AGREEMENT AREA OUT OF THE SAN ANTONIO ETJ BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS p T.~. FORD ENGINEERING INC. y'ft toa27 wre orsne,aurrE~oa siw ~iiioria, ioas~azn•Rio>seo-4m ~ PROJECT NO. 9 924.67 PAGE 9 OF 2 ~„a~ 50306808.2 A-2 EXHIBIT B San Ant®ni® IH~10 East Perianeter flan See attached 50306808.2 B-1 EXHIBIT C Imfltflal Anaaexati®m See attached 50306808.2 C' 1 ` ~ . , ° ~ / i { • ~ ~ ~i - _ ~f i ti w t r `"I a T~ , r a ; • . I 7578 . c - sn ~~`"TY°" ~ City of Schertz » M Annexation Proposals EXHIBIT C s Last Update: March 23, 2010 Cgoi sm.m. cisaoo~.mr Tony).traor.am<u.Qaaae:.amp io)ei4nea _q _ .:~r`~"-,,,,,~ - Miles ,..,.._.........,.....e. 0 0.125 0 25 0.5 0.75 i 50306808.2 C-2 1® S hEI~IMETEI~ hL,d?N (JhD,~T~ i i _ . _ . ~ ~ Cit ~ ~ c . - ~ ; ;~w r ~ ~ ~ ~ 4~ 1 ~~;`x~~. ~ St. Hedwrg :E ~s~t~~~r.. f~ ~.1 p~S ,f _ _ ~ E ; tE ~ 3 ~'~~3vt'~._c ~ "w. ~ _ 6' ~to~ : "R. ~ l_-- ~ i - 1F. r S j ~ 1. c is~~ 7 ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ Crty - of s ~ ~-tom E c _ _ : St. Hedwrg "The pastern Corrigor'~ I~repareci by t1,e IH 1®East piannin~ Team in partnership with the City of San ,Antonio planning and Community Development Department, March 2~~8 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan TABLE OF CONTENTS II3 10 EAST PERIMETER PLAN UPDATE ACKNO WL,EDGEMENTS .....................................................................................................2 PUBLIC OUTREACH ..........................................................................................................4 INTRODUCTION 5 REGIONAL OBJECTIVES ....................................................................................................9 LAND USE PLAN ..............................................................................................................15 EXISTING LAND USE MAP .................................................................................................24 LAND USE PLAN MAP .......................................................................................................25 CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT ........................................................................................36 COMMUNITY SPOTLIGHT ..................................................................................................39 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................44 PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION ................................................................................59 CITY COUNCIL ORDINANCE ...............................................................................................60 IH 10 EAST PERIMETER PLAN (adopted February 22, 2001) INTRODUCTION TO IH 10 EAST CORRIDOR PERIMETER PLAN .................................................1 BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................................6 TRANSPORTATION AND CIRCULATION .................................................................................8 MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN MAP ............................14 COMMUNITY FACILITIES ...................................................................................................20 LAND USE ........................................................................................................................24 EXISTING LAND USE MAP ..................................................................................................26 FUTURE LAND USE MAP .....................................................................................................33 CONCLUSION .........................................................................................:..........................34 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Planning Team /Participants City Officials Mayor Kathryn Alvarez Phil Hardberger, Mayor Laura P. Arens Stu Beam City Council Chuck Blair Mary Alice P. Cisneros, District 1 Julio Cardenas Shelia D. McNeil, District 2 Earl Cook Jennifer V. Ramos, District 3 Robert Dawson Philip A. Cortez, District 4 Delores Dehoyos Lourdes Galvan, District 5 Loretta Hilburn Delicia Herrera, District 6 Julie Hinojosa Justin Rodriguez, District 7 Sylvia Elguezabal Diane G. Cibrian, District 8 David Frankle Louis E. Rowe, District 9 Chris Gabbard John G. Clamp, District 10 Thomas D. Gaffney Janice Gangawer Planning Commissioners Mary Ann Hajek Murray H. Van Eman, Chair Cliffton Jefferson Cecilia G. Garcia, Vice Chair Gilbert Jimenez Dr. Francine S. Romero, Chair Pro Temp Cynthia Johns Dr. Sherry Chao-Hrenek Linda Jones John Friesenhahn Melissa Castro Killen Amy E. Hartman Rob Killen Stephanie L. James Mark Luft Jose R. Limon Arelia Kimbrough Ivy R. Taylor Joe Linson Daniel Martinez Hortense Martinez Planning Department Staff Rosalio Martinez Patrick Howard, AICP, Assistant Director David Moody Nina Nixon-Mendez, AICP, Planning Manager Misty Nichols Zenon (Zeke) Solis, Project Manager Reginald W. Russell Bill Burman, Project Planner Diana Tosh Tamara Palma, Project Planner Alton Vrana Darcy Walker Gary Edenburn Richard Wendt Lauren Edlund Jerelyn Williams Andrea Gilles Nick Williams Sidra Maldonado Nancy Winkler Tyler Sorrells, AICP Ed Whinery Michael Taylor Trish Wallace, AICP March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan ~echnocal Adv6~®r~ Bexar County Citv of Schertz Richard Higby, Transportation Planner Misty Nichols, Planning & Zoning Department Chris Gabbard, Planning & Zoning Department City of San Antonio (COSA) -Council Action Team City of St. Hedwig Donna Lee, District 2 & 10 Kathy Palmer, Planning & Zoning Commissioner COSA -Parks & Recreation Department San Antonio Metropolitan Health District David Clear, Park Projects John Berlanga Scott Stover, Park Projects Manager San Antonio River Authority COSA -Public Works Deuartment Claude Harding, Real Estate Manager Alejandro Alvarado, Storm Water Engineering Dale Bransford, Manager of Parks Anibal Gutierrez, Traffic Georgia Snodgrass, Real Estate Representative Christina De La Cruz, Traffic Engineer Gilbert Jimenez, Real Estate Representative Lyndon Duano, Storm Water Engineering Jim Blair, Manager of Watershed Operations Robert Browning, Storm Water Engineer Steve Graham, P.E., Assistant General Manager City of Converse TXDOT Mark Luft, Economic Development Director Chris Chambers, Landscape Architect Sam Hughes, City Manager Jonathan Bean, Transportation Engineer Richard Wendt, Fire Chief Thomas Graff, Project Manager Ken Zigrang, District Transportation Planner City of Kirby Union Pacific Railroad Reginald Russell, Planning & Zoning Commissioner Zina Tedford, City Manager Joe A. Garcia, Mgr. Ind. & Public Projects March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PUBLIC OUTREACH PLANNING TEAM MEETINGS: AUGUST 1, 2006 (7 in attendance) • JUNE 25, 2007 (10 in attendance) • JULY 18, 2007 (12 in attendance) • SEPTEMBER 5, 2007 (12 in attendance) • SEPTEMBER 19, 2007 (8 in attendance) • SEPTEMBER 26, 2007 (7 in attendance) NOVEMBER 26, 2007 (6 in attendance) DECEMBER 3, 2007 (10 in attendance) OPEN HOUSE MEETINGS: JANUARY 30, 2008 -Alamo United Methodist Church, 4071 N. Foster Rd. (10 in attendance) February 9, 2008 -Alamo United Methodist Church, 4071 N. Foster Rd. (47 in attendance) ° Documents available for comment February 4 - 9, 2008 at: SAPD East Substation, 3635 E. Houston City of Schertz Public Library, 608 Schertz PKWY City of Converse Public Library, 601 S. Seguin PLANNING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING: FEBRUARY 13, 2008 CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING: MARCH 20, 2008 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan INTRODUCTION This Update of the IH 10 East Perimeter Plan provides information about the planning area, its boundaries, Plan Update requirements, the plan drafting process incorporating citizen input, plan outreach and the implications of recognition of the plan by the City of San Antonio. Plan Basics The IH 10 East Perimeter Plan is a partnership effort between the IH 10 East Planning Team, the Cities of Kirby, Converse, Schertz and St. Hedwig and the City of San Antonio Planning & Community Development Department. The plan is the result of eight months of dedication from the Planning Team and other active residents and business representatives. Boundaries For purposes of this plan update, two areas have been taken under consideration for analysis. The first area is the boundary of the 2001 adopted IH 10 East Corridor Perimeter Plan, which from this point forward will be referred to as the ~~Regional Study Area". The second area will be referred to as the ~~Plan Boundary", which is entirely within the San Antonio City limits and the San Antonio Extra- territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The Regional Study Area is 100 square miles, incorporating Randolph Air Force Base, Martindale Army Air Field, portions of Bexar County and the Cities of Kirby, Converse, San Antonio, Schertz, and St. Hedwig. The Regional Study Area is bound by the Union Pacific Railroad tracks, parallel to Gibbs Sprawl Road (FM 1976) to Loop 1604 along Seguin Road (FM 78) to the north, the Bexar County line, formed primarily of Cibolo Creek to the east, St Hedwig Road (FM 1346) to the south, and Loop 410 to the west. The update Plan Boundary area is 56 square miles, including 43 square miles of San Antonio ETJ and 13 square miles within the San Antonio City limits. The IH-10 East Perimeter Plan area is generally bound by Gibbs Sprawl and the San Antonio ET] to the north, Cibolo Creek to the east, the San Antonio ETJ and FM 1346 to the south, and Loop 410 to the west. Five different school districts serve the region: East Central ISD, San Antonio ISD, Judson ISD, SchertZ -Cibolo -Universal City ISD, and ~~S Martmezt~eek Wateeslee~Re7eINan Dsms Randolph Field ISD. ~w.; ~ w?_' ' The planning area is rich in natural resources with six creeks spanning m_ the area: Cibolo Creek, Escondido Creek, Martinez Creek, Rosillo _ ~_u~~o~~ Creek, Ackerman Creek, and Woman Hollering Creek. Four of the six .w-;~, Martinez Creek Watershed retention dams are in the Plan area as well. q_~? ~ Martinez Creek Retention Dams March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Much of the area south of IH 10 East is agricultural in nature. Large scale residential development is occurring throughout the area north of IH 10 East, and many well established neighborhoods are present. Commercial uses are found along arterials and the IH 10 E corridor. Some of the more prominent Industrial uses in the area are BFI Waste Services landfill and Lancer Corporation; both southeast of Foster Road and IH 10 E, and Cornerstone Industrial Park at the northeast corner of Loop 410 and IH 10 E. Significant tracts of vacant, un-platted land can still be found in the planning area. Why update a plan? The City of San Antonio revisits the Future Land Use Plan component of Neighborhood and Community Plans every 5 years to ensure conformance with City policies, and to analyze the need for possible adjustments in order to adapt to changing community needs and growth patterns. The update of the IH 10 East Perimeter Plan is based on research by City staff, coupled with input from the Planning Team whose members include residents, developers, and neighborhood leaders. This plan organizes the community's ideas into a single document that can be shared with residents, potential community partners and investors. A/though there is no specific financial commitment for imp/ementation from the City of San Antonio or identified agencies, the IH 10 East Perimeter Plan will serve as a guide for making decisions related to development and zoning issues. Planning Area Characteristics The IH 10 East Perimeter Plan boundary area is home to more than 29,166 residents according to the 2000 Census (see Appendix A: Community Demographics). This number represents an 88.5 percent increase in population from the 1990 Census data which is less than the growth rate the area experienced between 1980 and 1990 at 128.5 percent. According to the 2000 Census, 35.5 percent of planning area residents are Hispanic, 33.4 percent Anglo, 24.8 percent African-American and 6.3 percent other races and ethnicities. Since the 1980 Census, the area has experienced significant diversification. The 2000 median household income of $47,400 is higher than the citywide median income of $36,214. According to the Census, the median home value in the planning area was $79,400, which is also higher than the citywide median of $68,800. March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan More than 3,352 dwelling units were added to the planning area between 1980 and 1990; a growth rate five times the City average during that same time period. Residential development slowed slightly during the 1990s; however, in the second half of the decade it reached 9,488 housing units in 2000, a 68.7 percent increase. Given the sheer size of area, there is limited commercial development in the planning area to match the housing growth rates. Streets and drainage infrastructure have not been upgraded in many areas and crowding has caused the five school districts to embark upon major bond programs to add classroom space and construct new facilities. Getting Started In August 2006, the Planning & Community Development Department met with the Planning Team to discuss the Plan Update process. Further meetings to develop the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) took place in June 2007. The Memorandum of Understanding outlined the responsibilities of the Planning Team and the Planning & Community Development Department for the planning process. The Planning Team (see Acknowledgements for a listing) is composed of representatives of planning area neighborhoods, developers, school districts, religious leaders, business owners and adjacent municipalities. An initial team was developed with the original Plan adoption in 2001 and has been updated since. Community-Based Process The IH 10 East Perimeter Plan was developed following the guidelines set out in the Community Building and Neighborhood Planning Program, adopted by City Council in October 1998 and further specified in Article IV of the Unified Development Code adopted in 2001 and amended in 2004. Between June 2007 and February 2008 seven Planning Team workshops were held to draft the majority of the plan. An additional session was held in December 2007 to discuss how a gateway corridor overlay district could be utilized along IH 10 East to encourage sustainable development and promote the preservation and enhancement of the character of an area. Public open houses were held on January 30 and February 9, 2008 to give community members an opportunity to review the proposed land use plan update. The documents were also made available for review and comment at three different locations from February 4-9, 2008. The documents were also online in a "virtual open house" for review and comment. The draft plan resulting from the workshops was submitted to relevant City departments to review the plan for consistency with City policies. Community Outreach The Planning & Community Development Department, together with the partnering neighborhoods, worked to encourage participation in the community planning process. The mailing list included over 1,345 homeowners, business owners, owners of commercial and vacant properties, and meeting attendees. A press release announced the open house. A notice of the public hearing before Planning Commission was featured in the Commercial Recorder Newspaper. °7 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Recognition by the City of San Antonio After a review by City departments and a final community meeting, the IH 10 East Perimeter Plan was forwarded to the Planning Commission for consideration. The Planning Commission reviews the document to ensure the Perimeter Plan was created through an inclusive process, is consistent with City policies and accurately reflects the community's values. After Planning Commission consideration, the plan was forwarded to the City Council for adoption as a component of the City's Comprehensive Master Plan. An approved plan is used by City departments, boards and commissions as a guide for decision making. Key projects may be selected from the plan to be included in the Annual Improvement Project Report. The report is provided to City Council as part of the budget process, although there is no guarantee of funding. Consistency with Other City of San Antonio Plans The IH 10 East Perimeter Plan is consistent with the ideas found in the 1997 Master Plan, the 1978 Major Thoroughfare Plan as amended and the 2004 Parks System Plan. The plan also is supported by the following Master Plan goal: Neighborhoods, Goal 2: Strengthen the use of the Neighborhood Planning Process and neighborhood plans. March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan REGIONAL OBJECTIVES Purpose In this section, specific regional goals and objectives are identified that address issues and opportunities related to transportation, land use, and quality of life. Due to the nature of this process, not all issues can be addressed in this document, so useful contact names, departments/agencies and numbers have been listed in Appendix C -Resources. Each section includes a summary of issues, goals, objectives, action steps, and community partners. Regional. Mobility Neighborhood Accessibility - Eastaate Community Summary: The Eastgate neighborhood is a residential community located at the southeast corner of IH-10 East and Loop 410. When the development of the Loop 410 Freeway system was completed in the mid 60s, much of the existing community was enclosed, with the Access Road to serve as the only transportation system in or out. Since then, the Access Road has been restricted to ~~One Way" trafFic patterns due to safety, which now constrains the community to ingress at Houston Street and egress at Ackerman. Exit Analysis was completed in 2004 by Public Works calling for a needed drainage Y,n, channel and new 30 foot roadway connecting the existing Peggy Street to FM 1346. - - Street construction would include sidewalks, curbs, drivewa a roaches, and - ; necessary drainage. Total project cost at the time of study was estimated at $3,749,000 and would require a bond initiative due to size of cost. Entrance Goal 1: Im rove Infrastructure ~ _ p ~ j Provide safe, alternative and appropriate infrastructure throughout the area " including transportation, drainage and sewer. Objective 1.1: Provide a safe, alternative transportation route into the community that allows for pedestrian and vehicular safety and traffic control measures to alleviate heavy truck traffic "cut through". Action Steps: 1.1.1 Work with City Engineers to review Peggy Road and advocate for improvements as needed. Contact Public Works Capital Programs Division to request cost estimates. Advocate for COSA Bond Program to address the costs associated with the extension of Peggy Road. March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Objective 1.2: Identify and prioritize streets that are used as heavy truck ~~cut through". Action Steps: 1.2.1 Create a dialogue with the San Antonio Police Department and SAFFE Officers to discuss the feasibility of increased random traffic patrols. Partners: Eastgate Neighborhood Association, IH 10 East Planning Team, Public Works Traffic Engineering, San Antonio Police Department SAFFE Officer, and City Council District 2 Objective 1.3: Improve access to sewer infrastructure in the East Commerce Estates area (East Commerce Estates is genera//y located between FM 1516 and Loop 1 S04 at the NW cornei North of IH 10) Action Steps: 1.3.1 Encourage residents of East Commerce Estates to connect into sewer lines by offering incentives such as fee waivers. Partners: COSA Grants Monitoring and Administration Department, San Antonio River Authority (SARA), East Commerce Estates residents Converse - Crestwav Road Connection Summary and Action Steps: Currently Crestway Road is listed in the Major Thoroughfare Plan as a Secondary Arterial Type A with 86 feet of right of way. The issue is lack of connection between the City of Converse and the City of San Antonio. The existing rail grade elevation is approximately 14 feet high at Gibbs Sprawl Road preventing an at grade crossing. Discussions were had years ago about moving forward on a feasibility study to determine the best possible scenario to achieve the objective. Since then, discussions are being revisited concerning the best course of action. The Crestway connection will provide the surrounding area alternative access for both commerce and in cases of emergency. Goal 2: Provide Accessibility to Neighborhoods S T Objective 2.1 Develop plan for Crestway improvements ~ j ~ _ Action Steps: 2.1.1 Secure funding for feasibility study ~ ~ ~ ~ , Partners: IH 10 East Planning Team, City of Converse, Bexar County, - TXDOT, Union Pacific, COSA Public Works and City Council District 2. .u_...,:.,~ 1® March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Compatibility Land Use Compatibility Throughout the Region Summary: One reason the IH 10 East Perimeter Planning Team first materialized was to address the heavy trucking businesses that were taking shape throughout the IH 10 East Corridor. The adopted 2001 Plan states on page 24, °Enhance the diversity of other land uses (agriculture, residential, and commercial) so that industrial uses (freight transport, manufacturing and construction) do not dominate the Corridor". Of the approximately 7,459 zoned acres in the City limits of San Antonio, approximately 2,338 acres are either zoned industrial or business park; much of which is currently vacant. Pockets of industrial uses without proper zoning or certificates of occupancy can be seen in the region. Goal 3: Compatibility of Land Uses Improve the quality of life and safety of residents of the IH 10 East Perimeter Planning area by addressing incompatible land uses. Objective 3.1: Increase Building Inspection efforts and Code Compliance throughout the community. Action Steps: 3.1.1 Proactively address uses not allowed in particular zoning districts by educating neighborhood residents and business owners and working with Code Compliance officers and Building Inspectors. Participate in the Blue Card notification program and educate the neighborhood about compliance issues by having a Code Compliance officer speak at Neighborhood Association meetings about basic regulations and violations. Work with COSH Code Compliance and Development Services Building Inspectors to identify strategies for addressing property maintenance issues and building code and code compliance infractions. Create a list of addresses to be investigated for zoning infractions. Partners: Eastgate Neighborhood Association, IH 10 East Planning Team, Development Services Building Inspectors, Housing & Neighborhood Services Code Compliance Division, Council District 2. 11 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Compatibility - Kirby Summary and Action Steps: Presently much of the parcels abutting the n_~~~~- City of Kirby at the northeast corner of IH 10 East and Loop 410 are either industrial uses or vacant with industrial zoning. The parcels in the Kirby ~ s - i 1.~ R.4 City limits however; are primarily single family residential uses, although $ ~ ~ some commercial and light industrial zoned tracts are present. Issues ~ Y_ k, ~ brought about by industrial manufacturing uses have been identified by y , the residential community as problematic. - To address future issues with large vacant tracts of land abutting the community it has been determined that a reduction in land use density is needed. Further review may call for an area down zoning as well. Partners: IH 10 East Planning Team, City of San Antonio Planning & Community Development Department, Development Services Department Zoning Division, and City Council District 2. Land Use Compatibility - Schertz & Saint Hedwig Summary and Action Steps: During the Land Use analysis process of planning it is essential to understand the overall community in which the study is being conducted. With that said, the reality of both areas was to address the individual needs of the community while analyzing existing or projected conditions. The City of Schertz boundary along IH 10 East is a unique opportunity in that current uses are limited to smaller uses but have strong development potential due to population growth patterns. Utilizing an Urban Living land use category along the San Antonio side of this area offers a greater mix of uses while promoting stronger design controls. The City of Saint Hedwig is more rural in character than Schertz thus requiring a different approach to the land uses applied. Heavily based in agriculture, the community of Saint Hedwig recently adopted a City Master Plan in 2007 to address the development objectives of maintaining the rural character. In the IH 10 East Perimeter Plan the land use utilized makes an effort to mimic those goals by incorporating Agriculture land use around the northern periphery of Saint Hedwig ETJ and Rural Living land use for the remaining areas. Each Land Use category is described within that respective section of this plan. The future land use maps included in this document illustrate the location of those uses. Partners: IH 10 East Planning Team, City of San Antonio Planning & Community Development Department, Development Services Department Zoning Division, and City Council District 2. 1Z March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Qua I ity of Life IH 10 East Corridor Overlay Summary: The purpose is to promote attractive and cohesive developments along the IH 10 East Corridor in a manner that protects the City's cultural, natural, and economic fabric. As a management tool for new growth, the overlay can protect capital projects and other public investments to stabilize and strengthen property values within the corridors and promote a quality environment that would assist in strengthening the economy of the City. Goal 4: Improve the Corridor Analyze design standards that can be implanted along the IH 10 East Corridor Objective 4.1: Corridor Overlay District Analysis Utilize stakeholders and design professionals to develop design standards Action Steps: 4.1.1 With the assistance of the City Council office, organize a planning team dedicated to reviewing and designing standards to enhance the IH 10 East Corridor. ~ Team should include property owners, stakeholders, local design professionals and residents. Re4ional Parks Summary: During the analysis phase of the planning process, it was noted that out of all the large scale residential developments taking place in the region there were very few parks and or open space areas. The San Antonio Parks & Recreation Department further studied potential locations within the planning area for additional park or open space. Two potential areas were identified, both of which are under San Antonio River Authority (SARA) ownership. Area 1, pictured below, is approximately 75 acres located directly off Binz-Engleman Road, west of FM 1516. The potential for this area lends itself to the recreational needs of the surrounding region. The elevations are relatively flat with some grade changes at the western portion of the subject area. Area 2 is approximately 120 acres, directly off Loop 1604 at the northern intersection of the projected Binz-Engleman connection to Loop 1604. The unique characteristics of Area 2 are the ~ ~ ~ ~ ; defining features; a portion of the area is h j J ~ as ~ currently utilized as Soccer Fields with a r ~ ,-t;~ walkable trail below Loo 1604 to the eastern z' F ~ rtion of the stud area. The eastern onion is ' ~ ~ ~ ~~ux~LL po Y P largely marsh land with a large habitat of bird ~ . _ ~ ~ a'~:. species. _ ~ ~o~ecteaRoad_ ~ _ 1~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Goal 5: Parkland and Recreational Facilities Create additional parkland by completing park projects and identifying locations for additional recreational facilities. Objective 5.1: Parkland Acquisition Develop additional lands for public parks. Action Steps: 5.1.1 Identify locations for additional parkland to meet needs of growing area and to protect wildlife habitat. Enforce parkland dedication requirements of Unified Development Code for new residential subdi- visions. ~ Work with the San Antonio River Authority on potential multi-party parks projects. Objective 5.2: Recreation Facilities Create additional recreation facilities. Action Steps: 5.2.1 Identify possible locations for soccer fields for the plan area. Consider expanding on location of current soccer fields at Loop 1604. 5.2.2 Seek a family entertainment area with multiple recreation activities. Partners: IH 10 East Planning Team, San Antonio River Authority, COSA Parks and Recreation, City of Schertz Parks Department, San Antonio Parks Foundation, Friends of San Antonio Parks, Texas Parks & Wildlife, and City Council District 2. r _ ~ R. r - - - r~ - ~.,u _ wy ~ ~ 1~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan LAND USE PLAN The Land Use Plan builds on the goals and objectives of the IH 10 East Corridor Perimeter Plan and identifies the preferred land development pattern. The plan reflects, in general terms, compatible land uses and serves as a policy guide for future development. Two primary tools for implementation of the land use plan are the Unified Development Code (zoning and subdivision ordinances) and the Capital Improvements Program (CIP), the city's six-year financial plan for capital projects. After adoption by City Council, the Planning & Community Development Department will consult the Land Use Plan as a guide for developing staff recommendations on individual zoning cases. The plan emphasizes preserving existing single-family developments, while locating most commercial uses at nodes, or along highly traversed corridors. Commercial uses are also segregated by intensity of use, with Regional Commercial uses being located primarily at the intersection of highways and arterials, Community Commercial uses located where collectors and arterials meet, and Neighborhood Commercial uses where collectors and arterials meet, or where collectors and residential streets meet. The planning process also placed a premium on the continued acquisition and development of additional open space and parks. The area south of IH 10 E presents a transition of land use from urban and rural living to agriculture. As this area continues to urbanize over time, these concepts call for a more intense, quality, mixed use development along the Interstate, while preserving rural and agricultural areas. Tools to implement this vision include Form Based Development, that provides for a mix of uses, while emphasizing quality urban design of the public realm, civic spaces, and the streetscape; thereby encouraging walkable communities. The Plan does not constitute zoning regulations or establish zoning district boundaries. The Related Zoning Districts in each Land Use category is meant to serve as a comparative guide to utilize when evaluating "consistency" between development /rezoning proposals and the goals of the plan. More intense land uses may be allowed in less intense land use categories subject to conditional zoning or a specific use authorization that would facilitate context-sensitive design in accordance with the plan's goals and objectives. Disclaimer for maps: This Geographic Information System Product, received from The City of San Antonio is provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, and the City of San Antonio expressly disclaims all expressed and implied warranties, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. The City of San Antonio does not warrant, guarantee, or make any representations regarding the use, or the results of the use, of the information provided to you by the City of San Antonio in terms of correctness, accuracy, reliability, timeliness or otherwise. The entire risk as to the results and performance of any information obtained from the City of San Antonio is entirely assumed by the recipient. Please contact the responsible City of San Antonio Department for specific determinations. Y~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Low Density Residential Low Density Residential Development includes Single Family Residential Development on individual lots. This form of development should be located away from major arterials, and can include certain non-residential uses such as schools, places of worship, Light Yellow and parks that are centrally located for convenient neighborhood access. Related Zoning Districts: R-4, R-5, R-6, NP-8, NP-10, NP-15, R-20, & RE Medium Density Residential Medium Density Residential includes Single Family Residential Develop- ment on one lot, including townhomes and zero lot line configurations, du- plexes,.triplexes, and fourplexes. This form of development should be located along collectors or residential Yellow roads, and can serve as a buffer between low density residential and more intense land uses, such as commercial. Related zoning Districts: This classifications includes certain non-residential uses such as schools, R-4, R-5, R-6, NP-8, NP-10, places of worship, and parks that are centrally located for convenient NP-15, R-20, RE, RM-4, neighborhood access. RM-5, & RM-6 'E'~~ t r,_ ~ ~f - a rC~ 5 - =-L.__ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description High Density Residential High Density Residential Development includes multi-family developments with more than four units, such as apartment complexes, but can also include low density and medium density residential uses. This classification can include certain non-residential uses such as schools, places of worship, and parks that are centrally located for convenient neighborhood access. Orange This form of development should be located along collectors, arterials, or high- Related zoning Districts: ways, and can serve as a buffer between low or medium density residential land R-4, R-5, R-6, NP-8, NP-10, uses and commercial uses. NP-15, R-20, RE, RM-4, RM- 5, RM-6, MF-25, & MF-33 High Density Residential uses should be appropriately buffered from adjacent residential uses through landscaping, screening and lighting controls. - i ~I (4 P Q . T - l 1. Neighborhood Commercial includes less intense commercial uses with low- impact convenience, retail, or service functions. Examples of uses include Neighborhood Commercial convenience store, small insurance or doctors office, bakery, small restaurant, bookstore, antique shop, copy service, veterinarians office, or small, neighborhood sized grocery stores. Locations for Neighborhood Commercial include arterials and collectors Pink where they meet arterials, other collectors, or residential streets. Related zoning Districts: Neighborhood Commercial can serve as an appropriate buffer between low, NC, 0-1, & C-1 medium, and high density residential uses, or between an arterial and low density residential. *c S~ Y March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Community Commercial Community Commercial provides for offices, professional services, and retail uses of moderate intensity and impact. Examples of uses include a gro- cery store, a medical office, music store, shoe store, nursery, or mailing ser- vices store. Bright Red Community Commercial should be located along arterials, preferably at inter- sections with other arterials or collectors. Related zoning Districts: Community Commercial can serve as an appropriate buffer between low, me- NC, o-i, c-1, & c-2 dium, and high density residential uses, or between an arterial and low density (except C-3 & O-2) residential. s~ t~a~ ~7 ~~s t , , Regional Commercial Regional Commercial provides for offices, professional services, and retail uses that draw on the customer base of a region. Examples of uses in- clude "big box" retail and retail "power centers", shopping malls, movie thea- tern, and medical or office complexes that are mid to high rise. Brownish Red Regional Commercial uses are typically located at nodes formed by highways and major arterials, or two major arterials, and are usually 20 acres or greater in size. Related Zoning Districts: 1vC, 0-1, 0-2, C-i, C-2, & C-3 Regional Commercial uses can serve as an appropriate buffer between an arterial or highway, and lower intensity commercial or medium to high density residential uses. v wi 1~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Public Institutional Public Institutional uses include public, quasi-public, and institutional uses that facilitate the containment or delivery of local, state, or national govern- mental or non-profit services. Examples include post offices, libraries, schools, fire stations, churches, community gathering facilities, etc. Light Blue The location for these services include where they currently reside, as well as where they meet the future needs of the community. ,z - r~ - . Parks /Open Space Parks /Open Space includes large, or linear, unimproved land where conser- vation is promoted and development is not encouraged due to presence of topographic constraints or institutional uses on the site. - Parks /Open Space include flood plains, utility corridors, public and private Light Green land uses that encourage outdoor passive or active recreation. Examples include City pocket, regional, or linear parks, as well as private parks associated with subdivisions and neighborhood associations. .3 ..tea- : ^S hr a. ? t _ - r F 1- Y~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan T and Use Classification Description Agriculture Agriculture uses provide primarily for the preservation of crop agriculture, ranching, and related agribusiness practices. Limited commercial uses di- rectly serving agriculture uses, such as farmers markets, nurseries, and bed and breakfasts, are permitted. Single-family residential units are permitted on agricultural and ranch lands. Where residential uses are permitted, conserva- Dark Green tion subdivision design is encouraged to conserve open space and provide for continuation of agricultural uses. Related Zoning Districts: FR&RP To maintain scenic qualities, natural vegetative buffers, deeper setbacks, in- creased signage control, earthen drainage channels, and more restrictive ac- cess management standards are desired along major scenic corridors. Flood plain protection and buffer zones along creeks and rivers are instrumental in retaining the rural character. Business Park A Business Park provides employment or civic uses interspersed with open space areas and pedestrian walkways in campus settings. This sec- tion is designed for business uses which carry on their operation in en- closed facilities in such a manner that no negative impact is created out- side of the boundaries of the business park. Business parks should be Gray separated from residential areas with landscaping areas and should fea- ture controls on lighting and signage. Business park uses include corpo- Related Zoning Districts: rate offices, light manufacturing, and warehouse uses. Accessory uses BP, C-3 & L may include on-site cafeterias, daycare facilities, incidental retail, other uses for the convenience and service of occupants of the business park. 1 ? :rzr - March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Light Industrial Light Industrial areas include a mix of light manufacturing uses, office park and limited retail/service uses that serve the industrial uses. Indus- trial uses should be screened and buffered from adjoining uses. Any outside storage must be under a roof and screened from public view. Examples of light industrial uses include drug laboratories, furniture Light Purple wholesalers, lumberyards, tamale factories and warehousing. Related Zoning Districts: C-3 & L - ~f.~ :,r. l Industrial General Industrial includes heavy manufacturing, processing and fabricating businesses. General industrial uses shall be concentrated at arterials, expressways, and railroad lines. This use is not compatible with residential uses and should be separated from residential uses by an intermediate land use or a significant buffer. Dark Purple Related Zoning Districts: ~yu~.yr. -,r.-- _ ° ; } " ~":F7~ ~ a., i. °f .r ~ c rtr y s 1 " ' , G1 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Urban Living Urban Living provides for compact neighborhoods and centralized commer- cial areas that promote a sense of community and are pedestrian and transit friendly. Centralized commercial centers in this category include the Mixed Use Center, the Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and the Town Center. Adjacent to these mixed use commercial areas are less dense Neighborhood Light Orange Centers, which have a nucleus, or a focal point. Urban Living also provides for form based development, which emphasizes urban design in the form of regional centers and village development patterns. Mixed Use Centers should Related zoning Districts: be a concentrated blend of residential, retail, service, office, entertainment, TND, ToD, MXD, uD, & leisure, and other related uses at increased densities, where people can enjoy a FBZD wide range of fulfilling experiences in one place. Mixed Use Centers are typically located at the intersection of a collector and arterial street or two arterial streets. Transit Oriented Development includes residential and commercial uses that rely on transit, centralized parking, pedestrian linkages, and an option for bus rapid transit or light rail service. A Town Center provides a central civic function with mixed uses incorporated into the peripheral development. Neighborhood Centers have an identifiable nucleus or focal point and edges. Shopping, recreation and services would be accessible by foot or transit. Neighborhood Centers would have a mix of residential uses and an interconnected street network with bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Civic buildings and civic spaces are given prominent sites, and schools and parks are located within walking distance. The edge of the neighborhood is bound by a parkway or boulevard. March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Land Use Classification Description Rural Living Rural Living supports the principles of preserving rural residential character while retaining open space and scenic corridors. The Rural Living classifica- tion may provide a transitional area between the more urbanized, denser devel- opment, and significantly rural, open and agricultural land uses. Residential uses are composed mainly ofsingle-family dwellings on individual Lime Green estate lots. Clustered subdivisions that increase residential densities, in an ef- fort to preserve greater areas of open space and agricultural lands, are encour- aged. Village and hamlet form based development patterns are also encour- Related Zoning Districts: aged. Specific non-residential activities, such as schools, places of worship and RP, RD, RE & FBZD parks, are appropriate within these areas and should be centrally located to pro- vide easy accessibility. Neighborhood and Community Commercial uses will directly serve the resi- dential areas while ensuring compatibility with adjacent residential areas. Com- mercial uses should take the form of a village clustered around a plaza or open space for gathering and socializing. Live/work units, allowing for residential use above commercial space, are permitted. A limited number of nodal commercial uses are permitted. Community Com- mercial uses should incorporate well defined and accessible entrances, shared internal circulation, limited curb cuts to arterial streets, and parking lots that have sidewalks, shade trees, and vegetative screening. To maintain scenic qualities, natural vegetative buffers, deeper setbacks, sign- age control, earthen drainage channels, and access management standards are desired along major scenic corridors. Flood plain protection and buffer zones along creeks and rivers are instrumental in retaining the rural character. ~ ~ - ~ ~ p, a ~ W ~ ~ 0 - - V r `~r n€~ iy~ ~ ~ t ~ . \ J . ; ~ ~ j ~ € • ~ ~ > ~ . , ~ ~`"..,r ~ ~ ~ ~ z J ~ a a ~ o t ~ ~ .44 / i. ~c! I x ~ 1 ~r / r:.' I - u. ~ ~ e I~ j ~ ~ ~ - ~_B- - 1 ~ ~ F ~ ` ~ _or---- o _ L-_. ~ ~ ~ ~4i ~ ; ~ I 1 yi t t 1 c ~ I ~ p. i ~~fii~ - _ _ . i__ - ---_-1 - - E ; a _ - _ _ - E w ~ o ~ o m N UJ L Q i H Z ~s a$ J $ a s a~ f - O ,LL V/ € E ~ S je a p~ ~ ~ E~ ~p 3x ~ G ~ ~ ~ Z god ~~m -a, W ~ - ~ x ~y ' a C7 G a l~ 6d. C Eo O~Jz ck Nam ¢3E v3o W ~ ~ ~~o ~_,zW~ a~ 9 V ~ ~ o~~~ ®®®®®N a O F ? .t ; G v _ ~ ® .t I ds,ii _i ? ? ~ / si.h. 1 x~E ~ ~ AA ? w~ ° \ ~ ® ~ ~ ~ ? t ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 ti Y ~ ~a ~ 3 BtS! ~y~ v ~ ~t f C" _ ~ t ~ ~ b m _ ~ ~ ~~18b~S ~ _`,~1'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ 1 _ ~ ~~I~W~ ` o ~ W~' ~ ~ 9 • ~ ~d .4 ~ ~ ° Z° ~ ~ y ~ ~ - oN~ ~ d _ • os ao ~ ~ ~d~s~ ~ ~ ~o_.._.._.f ~ Ste- l ' p~ ~ ~ ~ S'.w. - ~ v oI v c r ~ _ . - ~°ti ® ~ ~9 ~ o B 3 ...L ~j ~ Y I~ M~ W ~aliaa N~aaad m p - 4 c ~ ~ _ 'm °a N ~ I~ Sp1ad Creek N , Z ¢k w ~ ~ _ N W p~ 9's,~, V ~ ~ ~ y~~ O a° l ~ w L', a° ~ i Jp Creek 2'..~J ~ ~ ~ ~ So, G' b'J,. 6 ~ rc I 6 ~1 LL z S 6\ « Fib ~ ? F=E 836 .--Yid. ~Y~w-CY~ l1.'.rj ~i b$$$~ ~ t} ~ CR J ~i5~~ uIY I r _ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~a ICI ~ ~ i I ~ II it I I~ $ SS i i "c S ~ gal ~ a _ ~ >II ~ 1 t O i A - N i ~ l ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ v Fi ~ ~ ~ I ( - ~ f° F j ~ I ~ III /~/fry _ - I I i .l. t I I ~ l i i i' lTll'' 3 l I i II f °A II~ _ ~ 1~ 5~ f.. -.i I gg ;1 - 8 I f 1 1 l l I p ! .tir ? ~ 1 4 1 ~ i Y ' _ ~ ~ i ~ Z ) i I _ S ~ '~3 ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I - °b ft.+~"5 - - \ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I I ~ ~ ~ ~ A~ ~ 3 ? I V` ? y~~~ i ~A19 L~~~~'J~'~ I ~ 1 1 ~ . ~F„ . ~f - iI I, N a I / r ~ 3 ti h ~ II ~ ~ ~I I I ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ it \ ~ .I _ ~ 1 9 ~ \ < ~ 8 F. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I _ ~ ~ s 111 5 / ~ '.a - III 1 6 .~£sma I 1 I L , ~ ~ " tia~ I' ~ ~i ~ I ~ j I ii ~ 3 a~ ~I ~ L~ ~ ~ ~ I E E i ~ ~ m V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I i ~ II I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a' a' ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ Vii, ~ ~ i I ~ ~~-i i i ~ ~ x" ~ I _i ~ it ~ ~ - f a~ i ? f ~ 1 I ~ I ~ ~ 11 -L - i ` v~ ~ ( y 1 ~ ` ' ~ ~ ; 1l L ~ ' ~ , I~` ~ ~ - - ~ ~ : ~lih i ~ 6;~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ a,~~ F'~'''t ,i- 1~, ' f~i1~ i ~ ~ ' \ F-~ _ 7 ~ \ ~ ~ I ~ a£ a9~ ~ e i .-i~~ ~ oY:fi gr y ~ ` ~ J \ t ' f m \ a - i j a ~ 2a~ ~ 5 3 4 ~ \ \ ~l 1 ~ ~ - ~ - ~ ~ ~ , _ y, j ~ ~ v ~ ~_1 ~ v., ~ .y , a / \ - £Y 1 t ~ ~ ' ,i~iJ" ~ ~ $ 1~ i ~ ~ 1~. i s„ ~ i> - W ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ € ,~l~ ~ ~ - i ~ ~ V A\ ~ ~ tsz ~ * ~ ' v I \ ~ i! ~ E i iTt ..ii rx,. ~ ~ $ ee ~Xh 3 t y~ o~ ~ t ' ~ ~ ~ i i ~rS c ~ R ~ ~F~~~. f ~ r n ~ J ~ ~ ~ E fhiiiii ~ ~ ` ~ ' -Y, ~a nom; "r ' j ~ ~ ~ .K i 4;~' ~ X12 i,l;~ i,ji 4a / fa4~i t z t ; r . ~i~ 'f III- \ A ~ , n I i i~ I ,.~o ~ , h ~ ~ i .I ,r--_ 'Zc 4 F ~ _ ~ ~ :,o a ~ _ , 1 £ / C~{"(~`~ ~ ~ ~ P ~.,'1V 3~1?" rG ~ ~ a F ~I ~ ~ ~,~A>S ~ ~ti f~ ~ E > ,~\C, \ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ `~r~ ~ t .iii ~ ~ ~ ~ l s F m = I~ @; a ~mi r ~r. o ~ 1' Y y i a 0 a~~ ~ i i ~ V ~ ~.c, _ . tQ i i £ ~ `O _ - t ' it ~ ~ I ~ I / - _ i O' 'r u I ~ I iII it ~ i \ao ~ ~ ~ F~ \ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ E j. ~ m ~ i. ~ I ~ ° , m-«~ ~ o - - ~ , n i I ~ i i~ ~ ~ ~y ~~i 1 ~ ~ > ~i ~ ~ I I ~ ~ E E I i~~ I ~ a'a' E, i i ~ 'w ~I I ~ ~ C I I I aJ t ; e ii s~ i l~'~ ~ ~ g` i I _ ~ ~I ~ t ~ ~ ~ I ~ ir.. - ~ I 9~r~ e t- i 1~~,~.,.f > x ~ I ~ ~ ' .fir ~ ~ j ~ ~i ~ ~ _ r I~ e. x: ~ - i 1 -L ~ j - ` L i ~ ~ I ~ ~ Lam. I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ - _ I ~ ~ ~ ; ~ - - ~ ~..~~f i - I ~ f , ~ ii t ; i e, II Z ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~~7 e ~ exsf ~ QE2 ~ ~gg ~ - g~ . ~ ~ Aga gab °E ~'^8 .1 _ y~ ~ i, ~ 1 ~ ~ j ' i 1 ~ ~ i ¢ I E a~ 1 ~xx ~ ;%i ~ ! 3 F i. 4 ~ _ ~ ~ 11 O C- 8 i f ~ y, ~ i i ~'r.af ,~~~4~~.ti~r+,~.~w~.~Nr~MMPOIi~P ~ d / R ~ S t ; t f ~ y ~ g ~ I % - T; 9 f ~ rr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l l i l - ~ i ~ rte.. ~ a f ; 'j b ~ ~ - i ~ 0 0 0 I= r f w ~ ~ ' / ~ E ~ ~ ~ _ r A ~ ~ ~~®I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ® a t, . y~ : :'iiN ~~:Ia i i!!i~;' i I ~ [i i i ~F~i; ~ r.,; iOiF . • ~ =,u~i;,xs; ~I , ' TE5 . BEY aES ~ • ~~5 bU~6 r ~ f f I, ; ~ ~ ytl - ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i A ~ ~ _ _ _A•• t u -"I ~i ~ I ~~H ~ k ~ \ L ¦ V • ~ - \ , ~ Y \ l e ~ i r 3 , 1 !I I p _ € ^t ~ 3 ~ ull~ui ;ilil ~ ~rl ~ i ~ i. 0 i ~ ~ ~1 i ~ u I . II ~ ~i I~~ 11 ~ ~~I I ~ I II~ s _ µ Y , I i 3 i 1 - 1 i I ~ f ! I ~uI i II~~ i ~ ( ~I i i ` ~ I ! I I I' ! n j a~ III ! a' ~ a h it l ~ $ I ,G 1 .w 4. ~r I i -..1 i ?J 5 _ _ ~ F li ~ t iVY~ M ! ~ r J ®®sva~-,ffi~ ~'I I ~ f 3 in. ( _ _ i a F n~I~' ; i I i ~ ' I ~ ~ ~ a i -I I , I L I , - ~ I , 'k,.'. ~ ¢ ~ E E I I ` ~ i~ .:i L ~ I - ~ I _ . ~l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I I - i~ i _ ~ $ I ~ e ~ Ii ~ 1~~ ° ~ 'I ~ e a~ I i '1 1 I i III ,16 ~ 4 i III I ~~M I I 1 l I ~I ~ • ~ ~-e~rp ~ , ~ ~ ~ , ~ I~ I ~I , , ; .,,,l,e,~ 4 ~ I i Y~ ; ; • ~ I ~ I ! a. iI _ ,ICI, ~ I i , ~ ~ !~ilili~t: e,+ ~ ~ , r % Ift, l % •~n,t' ii~l \ t ~ _ _ z S0~ ~?Ua _ j, a38 fi ~+3 \ ~ vg nE figg6 f f ~ ` _ / j" \ ~ \ \ ~ \ sp . °~i li i ~ $ ~ 7~` ~ ,'II U' ~ of ~ 1' i s _ ~,a ' II f ~ ~ ~ ~ j _ i ~ ~ ~ ~ e f £ ~ F L ~ ~ ~ £ r : . ti ~ g ~ is _ ~ 3 ~ _ _ i yt 3 ti. ~ tk{ s _ ""~r.~, ~ (1 a ~ s t 1;- ~ ~r 1 ~ b8 J r + - / 1 J` r r' ~ Y ' 1 , . E ° ` ~ % ~ T.., 1 5 H . ~ C ?N C ~ 9~~ L \ 1 .._7 t I ~Z =F, . m r ~~fil i :~i~ # '!!i~ t - 'y :fiil~ i a~ ~ S i I~ y t t:=i F'FF n~ , - 1 - - _ t u j a e 9es~ wd r _ ~ r , 1 6~ % l~ 1 I r i 1 f r" a88 ~ 0 r.....«..,.+~y _ - ~ egg's I i j r I °E S~F 'M„~.ww+..w. 't N I _ 1 I`I r rr ~ ono 8~§$~ r i I yi T - ~ i i~ ~ i I r i 7 ..L ~ L.~ ` ~ i I ~ P 1 I i i iy r ' A I L I_I ~ ~ ~ ~ i I~~i~i~i I ~ ±1 ~ I_ ~ _ 1 c IL_ 1 i I I' 4 ' n I u_. 1,_ ~ ~ / + 7 c it ~ ~ _ i~ I~{ ~ § E 1' ~ F i ' +r ! r r 3 ~ , r ` 1 ~ I ~ ' ~ ~ F~ i j 11 _ ~ i, s I I ~i ~ ~ F { r ~ i fS ~ ®I c ~ - ~ ~F. @ ~1 . _ I - a i g r a ~ j - i o ~ ~ i..: ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ . B ~ ~ - I II I , ! ~ , i li b~ ~ i i ~ - J ~ _ If lli I 3 i i_ 1. a i~ ~ 5 ~ -~i ~ , , a ~ i - ~ - , ~ i) , ~ w i I ~ ~ I l1 ~ ~ o ~ ~ , ~ I ~I ~ ~~I a ~ ~ ~ ~ o I~ ~ r w _ ~ _ ~ m _ j ~ ~ Ii ~ ` a ~ -I } ~ I ` I III ~ i I . ((,N ~ ~ ~ti±~ S ~;-I i ~ I~'I ~ I I I o I ~ ~a _ ~tf,! I I T ~ ~ I I i'Ir~l~ oli I_~- NQ 31IHM MM ( I i i I111I't3 ~ ~ 7 - I ~ I I ~ i ~ 1- I ~jijl j 1~~` ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ I i~ ~ 1 IJ,~ ~I I _I~~ J ^n7:.L5tip , ` I~ J I a~ r -l z ~ _ f`_ ~ Jr, i a r r, r S. a r ~ - ;r f TT ~ , T 1 z f _ ~ ~ 3 ~ E 2 i' 'a Y ~ _ aug i sg / f 1 Y b / ~ • i "rte... _ _ a T / ' ~ \ . + _ ,rte _ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ c r sT s ! y r7 • ~-I r ~i a aarus , r ~ - \ I - - . ~ - i 1 r~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ a j/ r 8ar IV ~ r' - _ r 7 r E ~ 2 t r ti tl 7 ~i ~ , f7~~ ~~ri J !r1 _r~~ t~ 7 - j t I'1 r - ~-s~ ~ ~ ,r~~~ ~ ~ I~Tr f ~ Lirr i~ 6 ! ~ r k j ~ i - ~ ~ E i = 1 ' ~ r c§ _ i ~ i I ~ ~ , I , i ; e ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ g~ err ~ - ~ ~ i ~ ~ a SRO ~ r _ . ~ l ~ a gcH~w1RS ' r~ ~ , t. ~ g ~ r l r ~ t r- r ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ v ~ i i - ~ 11 r ~Ir r~ 3 r ~ I I ~ II ~ ~ i ~ » r ~ t ~ r y~ ;y r._., 5 °u ~a w z ~ I t r_. .?n T_-.___ ~ i o' i - _ _ g o 3 ~ i > ~ b I n ~ E E a r 1 s j r r - _ / I 1 ~ i ~ I i, _ e r ~ ~ S ~ i,._ 9 I _ ~ y~M - - ~ ~ _ _ - , ~ ~ ~ u _ r_ r ,rt ,r ~ f ~ ii Y _ .~i~ t + ~ ~ _ r ;ki•t~R S a - ~ ij~ij { Est ~ ii r frri~:l p i ' ~ h I : ii%f p / Ir ~ril~lixs#y z~ 045 ~E2 e ~ ~sx ~9 @ a E ,6 ~s° wg Sao $yB& j' ~u • / ~ ~ ® ~ E $ ~ ?f® ,e 1 j 6~' ~ ' ~ ~ ® xx I J 3 ~ ' , ? / 1j~c d ? ? A ~ S. G ® a ? r { c6 q ~ ? ~ P • • Es ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~ ` 1?~l ~ d~ ~ o `r a "r , \ ~ ~ i \ I s § , ~ ~ t A A f ~ ~ ~ % ~ ~ ~ c I ~ :~jij!1 S L~{y~~~Ly~ ~ ` , 1.)<~ ~ % ` j';I j Ali ' i ~ ~ ; i i \ ~ ~ ~ i ~9E ~ZZ~fi r u ' 9~ ~OS~ a ¢yY- ~ ~ :b , -L_._. \ ~ ~ ~ \ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ '1. r ~ ~ \ e~ ~ t . . 3 rl ; "i- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a r~ r ~ t ~ ~ ~ M, " ` 1 ~ J ~ t r~1 \ \ ~ a r ~ ~ ' 177._ ~ r" ' ~,~~,a~f ' ~ ~ \ ~ ' ~ V ~ l r I r r _ ~_I ~ 8° r i ~ J % / fr ; ~ Y i 1~ ~ > ~ ~~2, ~l ~ ~ ~ / ( ~r\s~~,~/i~ ~1-) 7r 11~r! j'h7 ~l ~ 1 t;' r ' ~ ~ ~ '~~..n. 1 ~ ''~~1 y~t ' ' i. 'y ..y L" ~~U~'l ~ ' /;i ~ 1~ '~..~'.I?`/ f•:~ ~~t.~•.~~, 7 Jet rr p l l r 7 j / / f / ~~l ~ ~ I i ~ ~ ,i r~ ~ ~ ' ~ ' ~ ~ ~ jI ~ , /l~~'° ~i~ ~ i E , / , / / ~ / ~_S /T1?~Y~ 1 ~ i :.1 / ~~.J , ~ ~ > / r'~- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ / d- r ~ i ,1 i~ /i ~ j ? / , F ,~l' ~tfr 7 ~ ~ , ~ lIi I ~ h . i r iii}+} ~ ~i~~ili d ~ r i it } ...r. SOS ! r #j}4ii if~: e March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan CORRIDOR OVERLAY DISTRICT The following text provides a brief description of corridor districts. This zoning overlay is a tool available for areas to promote compatible development and may also be used to develop a specific theme to promote the character of an area. A Corridor District is a zoning overlay that addresses special siting and compatibility issues which require development regulations in addition to those found in the underlying zoning district. The overlay district has precedence over the base zoning district. In 1992 the City Council enabled Urban Corridor Districts to provide for control of screening, setbacks and signage along designated thoroughfare corridors in the City. Corridor Districts were established on IH-10 West, Loop 1604, Broadway, Fredericksburg Road, North St. Mary's, North Main, San Pedro and McCullough. After these designations additional corridor districts were not established due to amendments to the City Code including the on-premises sign ordinance, the landscape ordinance, the tree preservation ordinance and additional amendments to the UDC pertaining to screening and shading. The 1997 San Antonio Master Plan Policies recommended that the City'~review and strengthen the urban corridor regulations." In December 2002 the City Council adopted a new Corridor Districts enabling ordinance that can be used to promote cohesive development along the City's Major Thoroughfares. The new ordinance provides controls not available in the original ordinance, such as building materials; siting and grading standards; and a reduction in maximum allowable sign message areas. In addition, the new ordinance allows application of the overlay to a greater distance from the corridor roadway than under the original ordinance. Major Thoroughfares within the San Antonio City Limits and ETJ in the IH 10 East Perimeter planning area include Loop 410, Loop 1604, IH 10 East, Ackerman Road, Foster Road, Binz- Engleman Road, FM 1516, FM 1346, FM 78, FM 1518, Graytown Road, Woodlake Parkway, Walzem Road, and Gibbs Sprawl Road. To be designated as a corridor district, the area subject to the designation must meet at least one of the following criteria: • Serve as a primary entryway into the city from outside the city limits or the Bexar County line • Provide primary access to one or more major tourist attractions Abut, traverse or link designated historic landmarks, districts and/or historic roads or trails Have a public or private commitment of resources for redevelopment or revitalization of the corridor's buildings or infrastructure • Have historically served as a regional or commercial center • Abut, traverse or link the San Antonio River or its major tributaries including Leon and Salado Creeks Traverse residential areas where single family and multifamily housing units exist in residentially zoned areas along at least fifty percent of the corridor frontage • Traverse scenic terrain where natural areas (an area without man made alterations that contains native topography and/or native plants such as trees, shrubs, wildflowers, fortis and grasses) are present along at least fifty percent of the roadway frontage March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan It is recommended that IH 10 E and portions of Loop 1604 and Loop 410 where they intersect with IH 10 East, be considered for corridor overlay zoning, since IH 10 East is the eastern gateway to the City. Purpose The purpose of a Corridor Ordinance is to promote attractive and cohesive developments along the City's major thoroughfares in a manner that protects the City's cultural, natural, and economic fabric. As a management tool for new growth, the overlays can protect capital projects and other public investments to stabilize and strengthen property values within the corridors and promote a quality environment that would assist in strengthening the economy of the city. Corridor Districts are both consistent with and encouraged through the mandates and policy statements of the CRAG initiative and the 1997 Master Plan Policies. Analysis Section 35-339.01 "Corridor Districts" of the Unified Development Code provides a process for designating corridor districts along roadways in the City's Major Thoroughfare Plan. If a corridor district were to be considered, the ordinance under consideration would entail the adoption of site development standards and an amendment to the official zoning map to establish the boundaries of the IH 10 East Gateway Corridor Overlay District in City Council District 2. These boundaries could include those properties within 1,000 feet of the IH 10 East right of way or the San Antonio City limits (whichever is closer) extending 11 linear miles between Loop 410 and FM 1518. Developed by property owners and major stakeholders within the established boundaries, the site development standards would govern new construction and substantial rehabilitation projects within the district. The proposed Corridor District would need to meet the adoption criteria set forth in Section 35-339.01 of the Unified Development Code. The following data illustrates the existing zoning for those parcels along IH 10 East that fall within one thousand feet from public right of way or where the San Antonio City limits is closer: R-6 & NP10 = 339 acres MF-33 = 6 acres C-3-C & I-1 = 426 acres MH = 53 acres C-2 = 183 acres I-1-S & I-2 = 15 acres • UD = 74 acres C-2-C & C-3 = 409 acres BP = 6 acres March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Current development patterns along the IH 10 East corridor: Loop 410 to Ackerman Road North -Cornerstone business park and light industrial uses • South - Eastgate Neighborhood, some commercial and industrial uses Ackerman Road to Foster Road North -light industrial and community commercial uses • South -regional travel center at the intersection • Foster Road to FM 1516 North -commercial uses at Foster Road followed by Master Development Permits (MDP) 751, Woodlake Farms Ranch subdivision is currently under construction, single family residential lots and some industrial uses closer to FM 1516. • South -BFI Waster Services landfill, large vacant tracts and manufacturing at FM 1516 FM 1516 to Loop 1604 • North -largely industrial with some commercial uses at the intersection, single family subdivision midway to Loop 1604 and large vacant tracts. • South -large scale trucking sales with repair, and large vacant lots closer to Loop 1604 • Loop 1604 to FM 1518 North -the vacant northeast corner in the San Antonio City limits has an attached Vested Rights Permit (VRP) number of 03-11-006. This is the only VRP within the corridor review area. The remaining portions of land are all in the City of Schertz and largely rural in nature with some pockets of commercial. • South -large lot agriculture, vacant parcels, some residential development, and light commercial uses. Some areas of the San Antonio City limits. east of FM 1516 run 600 feet from the right of way and 500 feet from right of way south along the freeway east of Loop 1604. Public Input On December 3, 2007 staff met with the IH 10 East Planning group to discuss the team's vision for the IH 10 East Corridor. The public input will be used to identify what elements of the corridor should be protected and what should be discouraged. Dialogue about the character of the area provided insight to potential opportunities along the corridor including: Define the IH 10 gateway by integrating identification markers/signs/statues Direct access for the region to San Antonio New residential being developed - "commercial will follow" Incorporating building colors that are inviting Reducing hardscape through siting Addressing set backs More landscaping Address screening of long term large truck parking and outside activities • Uniform fencing • Address traffic flow (vehicular and pedestrian) Utilize service roads March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Purpose Though the primary goal of the Plan is to address Future Land Use planning in the City of San Antonio and ETJ, it is essential to note that the region makes up over 85,000 people and provides a vital glimpse to the growth patterns being seen northeast of San Antonio. The objective of the Community Spotlight thus focuses on the diversity each municipality has to offer the regional community while providing potential stakeholders a clip of insight. The City of San Antonio is not showcased in the Community Spotlight due to extensive reference through out the document. The history of the Plan area can also be located starting on page one in the 2001 adopted Plan attached to this document. Community Spotlight information was resourced for the Cities of Converse and Kirby through the related websites. All other information was received courtesy of the Cities of Schertz and Saint Hedwig. Communities The City of Converse, with a population of 10,787, is located in northeast ~ Bexar County and is home to more than 3,400 families and approximately 160 businesses. From 1970 to 1980, the population increased 254 percent. T According to Trans-Texas Water Program projections, Converse is expected to `r~ be the largest suburban city in the northeast San Antonio Metropolitan area x by the year 2010 with a projected population of over 20,000. Converse is conveniently located on FM 1604, San Antonio's outer Loop, midway between IH 10 and IH 35. Other major roadways providing easy access to the City include FM 78, FM 1516, FM 1976, Toepperwein Road, and Kitty Hawk Drive. The citizens of Converse enjoy VIA Bus Service throughout the City to downtown San Antonio, the shopping malls, the San Antonio International Airport, and other key Bexar County destinations. Converse is a Home-Rule City with aCouncil-Manager form of government, with the City providing all the basic services and recreational facilities. Converse also has excellent Fire and Emergency Medical Service and one of the lowest crime rates in the San Antonio Metropolitan area. The City of Converse continues to grow with several single-family residential subdivisions under construction. Converse is a great place to live and work. North Park Springtown Street ~9 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan The City of Converse has two beautiful recreational parks: Converse City Park & Converse North Park. Both park facilities are open everyday from 8:00 A.M. until Midnight. Converse Parks are home to several youth sports programs: Pony League Baseball Organization, Judson Youth Sports Foundation, & the Buccaneers Youth Organization. Converse City Park houses a swimming pool, baseball & softball fields, a football field and a recreational pavilion. And is also the festival home of NIGHT IN OLE CONVERSE which is held annually during the first week in October. Converse North Park houses a fishing lake, baseball & football fields, basketball court, and a children's playground. ~ _ { r ~4~ 4 T ~f u To learn more please visit ~ ~ ~ ~ f ~ the City of Converse _ ` z on the web at www.conversetx.net. ' To view the City's Zoning Map click on ~ T"~ "Document Center" from the site then -F _ ~ ¢ - ~ - "Zoning Map" at the bottom left side of the screen. . North Park ® The City of Kirby with a population of 8,673 is a community located adjacent to the Northeast San Antonio area. This 2.2 square mile community came into existence in 1917 as a loading zone for cotton on the Southern Pacific Railroad and later evolved into a farm-to-market and residential community. The City ` incorporated in 1955. ~ ~ r - a Kirby is the home of several businesses, : k. including Dairy Queen, Dollar General, Industrial Brake & Clutch, ~ i'~'~~''i Lupita's #1 Mexican Restaurant, Schertz Bank & Trust-Kirby ~ Branch, Groesbeck Masonry and Kirby Dental Kirby is proud of its small town atmosphere and looks forward to :f- not onl rowin its existin er b reservin its charact 9 Y Y9 9 9 ~ p businesses but by bringing in new ones as well ~ ' ~ - - _f, - City of Kirby Water Tower a - kgg;:. N City of Kirby Park Please visit the City of Kirby on the web at www. kirbytx.org. March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan The City of Schertz with a population of 31,788 is a unique community, which blends its historic past with a dynamic and high growth environment, C coupled with a diversity that gives it economic viability and strength. Schertz has grown from a small frontier town once known as "Cut Off" to a ~ ~ x ~ ~ burgeoning urbanized area which will be celebrating its 50th Anniversary as Corridor to the Future an incorporated city in 2008. The City of Schertz operates under the Council- Manager form of government. The first settlers came to Schertz around 1843. The Schertz family was among the first settlers to the area and members of the family still reside in the City to this day. The first name of Schertz was "Cibolo Pit," then "Cut Off," which resulted after the Cibolo Creek flooded, and the settlement was literally, cut off. The first settlers planted wheat, oats, and corn, which did not need special equipment to harvest and process. In later years, cotton was planted and proved to be a very productive cash crop. So much cotton was produced that there were two cotton gins in Schertz at one time. In 1870 the first gin was built by the Schertz family. It was powered by mules and then in later years by steam. This gin was located where the post office is at the present time. In 1876, one of the largest boosts to Schertz came when the Galveston, Harrisburg, and San Antonio Railroad was built through the town. This gave the people a chance to travel to San Antonio by rail instead of wagon or buggy, in addition to goods being shipped ~ µ , ~~.I~ ~ ~ ~ _ in and out. Some older residents can remember their . < ~ ~ r ~ - family leaving the horse and buggy at the livery stable, ~ board the train to go to San Antonio to shop or visit ~ _ ~ ~ ~ relatives and return to Schertz by midnight. The first ~ ~ ~ ; post office was established in 1882. At that time Schertz ~ was still known as Cut Off. In 1899 it officially became _ Schertz, Texas. The first bank was chartered in 1913. Today, Schertz is home to seventeen banks with two more being planned. Randolph Air Force Base was the biggest boom to Schertz in the late 1920's. To this day, "The West Point of the Air" continues to play a major role in the economies and communities of Schertz, Seguin, San Antonio, and New Braunfels. Schertz has come along way since the original settlers first established roots along Cibolo Creek. But while some things change, the pioneer spirit of our founders remains steadfast. ~Y March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan The City's !lision The Vision of the City of Schertz is that of a prosperous community of involved citizens who enjoy a high quality of life. _ As a relatively young community with forward-looking city leadership and management, Schertz has the unique opportunity to set its direction and shape its future. Aggressive economic _ ~ development initiatives and a proactive approach to growth management sets the community on the path to become a premier Texas community. Partly fueled by San Antonio's , tremendous growth and its strategic location along the IH 35 and IH 10 corridors, the City of Schertz seeks to create a welcoming and open place to conduct business. Schertz's economic prosperity is partly attributable to its diverse economic base and this business-friendly climate, but its residents help give the community its notable character. Nearly one third of the civilian adult population in Schertz are former military, and the city enjoys a close relationship with Randolph Air Force Base, which is located immediately outside the city limits with Fort Sam Houston's Brooke Army Medical Center 20 minutes away. In addition, a highly educated and relatively young workforce helps ensure that Schertz will continue to possess the talents and skills needed to help companies and families grow and prosper into the 21st century. The city offers various parks, recreational facilities, shopping and cultural amenities. Hundreds more of entertainment options are within an hour's drive of the city. Population Since the late 1980's, Schertz has witnessed unprecedented growth. 2006 was no different. In just over six years, the city's population has jumped from 18,694 to 31,788. In 2006 alone, the population rose from 26,463 to 31,788. During that same period, the city platted 1,357 new lots. Fortunately, Schertz has always striven to tackle the challenges associated with development and maintain and improve the quality of life the people have come to expect. Housing Schertz's population explosion can tell you something about the city; ,neop/e want to /ive here. The city's housing options are vast, with units available for starter, mid-range or luxury homes. The median and average home prices range from $164,950 to $173,217. ti To learn more please visit the City of Schertz on the web at www.schertz.com. ~ - . To view the City's Comprehensive Land Plan The Schertz Library Playscape was g0 t0 WWW.SChertZ.COm/clp/default.asp constructed in a week with the help of over 2,000 volunteers March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan The City of Saint Hedwig with a 2005 population of 1,843, has stood in east c'o~, Bexar County since 1855. The settlers built thatch-roofed log cabins, a log church o f. and a school. The Annunciation of the Blessed Virgin Mary Church was built in 1857. With these structures built, the citizens of the City began to turn their Sd//7t HGC]~W/9' attention to the miles of raw land. Planting corn and raising cattle were the first agricultural efforts in St. Hedwig. Today the only two-story structures in St. Hedwig are the occasional modern homes and businesses. Other focal points include the city social club, the feed store, general store, dance hall, American Legion Post and hall, fire department, post office, and Four Points convenience store. The St Hedwig post office opened on ]uly 27, 1860. The post office was actually located on the site of the social club for several years until the new building was built down the street. The St. Hedwig Volunteer Fire Department is definitely an important part of the small city. The firehouse charter was applied for and received in 1956 with the city receiving its first fire truck in 1957, one year before the firehouse was built in 1958. After its incorporation in 1957, Saint Hedwig remained without a city council until 1981. It was then that the city petitioned to elect officials. The city continues to operate as a general law type A municipality with an Aldermanic form of government. The Mayor and Aldermen ("City Council Members' are elected on a two year term basis by the registered voters. Today, the citizens of Saint Hedwig enjoy the benefits of a rural setting with the convenience of living near the San Antonio metropolitan area. The City of Saint Hedwig lies 17 miles east/southeast of the San Antonio metropolitan area. It is located within Bexar County, Texas. The City is located with close access to Interstate 10, Loop 1604 and Hwy 87, just southeast of Converse and northwest of La Vernia. Saint Hedwig is almost completely agricultural and residential in nature. Therefore, the livelihood of its citizenry relies almost solely on the economic health of the San Antonio metropolitan area and its surrounding communities. To learn more please call F the City of Saint Hedwig ~ at 210-667-9568. ~ ~ ~ ~ - F The City of Saint Hedwig Master Plan was adopted in 2007 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan APPENDIX A: DEMOGRAPHICS The following tables provide population and housing census data for both the IH-10 East Perimeter Plan area and the City as a whole. The following census tract block groups fall within the planning area: census tracts 1315.012-.014, 1316.041-.044, 1316.051, 1316.071, & 1318.002. This information was presented during the planning process as the community worked to identify issues and develop goals, objectives and actions steps for improving the neighborhoods within the planning area. POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS- COUNT YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 6,770 785,880 1990 15,471 128.5% 935,933 19.1% 2000 29,166 88.5% 1,144,646 22.3% ETHNICITY- HISPANIC YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 1,205 421,954 1990 3,833 218.1% 520,282 23.3% 2000 10,350 170.0% 671,394 29.0% ETHNICITY- ANGLO YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 5,019 299,357 1990 8,179 63.0% 339,115 13.3% 2000 9,748 19.2% 364,357 7.4% ETHNICITY- AFRICAN A MERICAN YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 511 57,700 1990 2,918 471.0% 63,260 9.6% 2000 7,238 148.0% 78,120 23.5% ETHNICITY- OTHER YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 35 6,869 1990 541 13,276 93.3% 2000 1,830 238.3% 30,775 131.8% March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan AGE DISTRIBUTION iH-10 EAST PERIMETER AGE BREAKDOWN AGE 1980 1990 % CHANGE 2000 % CHANGE BREAKDOWN 1980-1990 1990-2000 UNDER AGE 5 559 1,542 157.4% 2,577 67.1% AGE 5-17 1,820 3,886 113.5% 7,754 99.5% AGE 18-24 772 1,102 42.7% 2,279 106.8% AGE 25-44 2,257 6,548 190.1% 9,882 50.9% AGE 45-64 1,035 1,892 82.8% 5,663 199.3% AGE 65+ 287 501 74.6% 1,011 101.8% TOT POP 6,770 15,471 128.5% 29,166 88.5% CITY AGE BREAKDOWN AGE 1980 1990 % CHANGE 2000 % CHANGE BREAKDOWN 1980-1990 1990-2000 UNDER AGE 5 67,732 79,274 17.0% 91,804 15.8% AGE 5-17 185,506 192,524 3.8% 233,823 21.5% AGE 18-24 108,950 111,138 2.0% 122,905 10.6% AGE 25-44 206,036 299,708 45.5% 356,654 19.0% AGE 45-64 143,150 154,924 8.2% 219,812 41.9% AGE 65+ 74,506 98,365 32.0% 119,648 21.6% TOT POP 785,880 935,933 19.1% 1,144,646 22.3% ~5 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan POVERTY RATE- PERCENT BELOW POVERTY LINE YEAR % IH-10 EAST % CHANGE % CITY % CHANGE 1980 9.8% 20.9% 1990 6.2% -36.7% 22.6% 8.1% 2000 8.7% 40.3% 17.3% -23.5% MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 $19,400 $13,775 1990 $35,100 80.9% $23,584 71.2% 2000 $47,400 35.0% $36,214 53.6% EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT -FOR PERSONS AGE 25 & OLDER 1H-10 EAST PERIMETER EDUCATION BREAKDOWN EDUCATION 1980 1990 % CHANGE 2000 % CHANGE < THAN 12T" 803 906 12.8% 1,903 110.0% GRADE H/S GRADUATE 1,399 2,438 74.3% 4,189 71.8% SOME COLLEGE 731 3,961 441.9% 7,244 82.9% BACHELOR 646 1,015 57.1% 2,309 127.5% GRADUATE+ N/A 621 911 46.7% EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT -FOR PERSONS AGE 25 & OLDER CITY EDUCATION BREAKDOWN EDUCATION 1980 1990 % CHANGE 2000 % CHANGE < THAN 12T" 175,430 171,654 -2.2% 173,563 1.1% GRADE H/S GRADUATE 119,852 135,221 12.8% 168,209 24.4% SOME COLLEGE 71,237 149,961 110.5% 203,570 35.7% BACHELOR 57,518 64,437 12.0% 95,761 48.6% GRADUATE+ N/A 37,771 54,919 57.9% March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan MEDIAN YEAR STRUCTURE BUILT AGE OF STRUCTURE 1980 CENSUS 1990 CENSUS 2000 CENSUS MEDIAN YEAR (iH-10) N/A 1983 1989 MEDIAN YEAR (CITY) N/A 1969 1974 HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS (OCCUPIED) YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY CHANGE 1980 2,273 277,563 1990 5,625 147.5% 365,414 31.7% 2000 9,488 68.7% 433,122 18.5% NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS (VACANT) YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY CHANGE 1980 181 18,579 1990 660 264.6% 38,653 108.0% 2000 374 -43.3% 27,648 -28.5% NUMBER OF HOUSEHOLDS (TOTAL) YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980. 2,092 258,984 1990 4,965 137.3% 326,761 26.2% 2000 9,114 83.6% 405,474 24.1% MEDIAN HOME VALUE YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 $47,200 $27,300 1990 $67,000 41.9% $49,700 82.1% 2000 $79,400 18.5% $68,800 38.4% MEDIAN MONTHLY RENT YEAR IH-10 EAST % CHANGE CITY % CHANGE 1980 $240 $174 1990 $550 129.2% $308 77.0% 2000 $780 41.8% $549 78.2% March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan APPENDIX B: CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS PROJECT NAME & PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 1 Sunrise Park Development of ba- $52,260.00 Duration Parks & Improvements- 6525 sic park amenities 1/07-4/07 Recreation Binz-Engleman Rd. including a basketball court 2 FY 2003 District 2 Development of a $235,000.00 Duration Parks & Park Improvements park entrance, 12/05-7/06 Recreation Package- parking area, and Northampton Park, walking trails 8989 FM 78 3 Carver Branch Variety of repairs $616,000.00 FY07 Libraries Library- 3350 E. including roof, (approx. 3 miles Commerce St. HVAC, and west of Plan plumbing area) q, Windcrest Future joint- use $900,000.00 FY09 Libraries Bookmobile Stop facility with NEISD (approx. 3 miles at Roosevelt HS north of Plan area) 5 Rosillo Ranch TIRZ Reinvestment zone- $44,827,637.00 Duration 20.35 Housing & construction of sin- years Neighborhood gle family, multi- Services family homes, parks, and commercial space 6 Cactus Sun- from Micro Surface $29,292.37 Completed Public Works Winter Sunrise to Mystic Sunrise 7 Mystic Sun- from Hot Paver Laid $153,648.94 Pending Public Works Binz-Engleman to Micro Surface Catalina Sunrise $ Summer Fest-from Hot Paver Laid $268,670.40 Scheduled for Public Works Foster to Seguin Micro Surface FY08 g Winter Sunshine- Micro Surface $44,008.14 Completed Public Works from Glacier Sun to Sunrise Cove 10 Glacier Sun- from Micro Surface $74,157.90 Completed Public Works Winter Sunrise to Sunrise Cove March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PROJECT PRO]ECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 11 Coral Sunrise- from Hot Paver Laid $31,449.60 Scheduled for Public Works Glacier Sun to Micro Surface FY08 Mission Sunrise 12 Catalina Sunrise- Hot Paver Laid $31,680.00 Scheduled for Public Works from Sunrise Creek Micro Surface FY08 to Mystic Sunrise 13 Misty Springs- from Micro Surface $47,672.94 Completed Public Works Sun Canyon to Summer Fest 14 Sun Canyon- from Hot Paver Laid $60,134.40 Scheduled for Public Works Misty Springs to Micro Surface FY07 Summer Feat 15 Coral Sunrise- from Hot Paver Laid $24,883.20 Scheduled for Public Works Comanche Sunrise to Micro Surface FY08 Dead End 16 Sunrise Bend- from Hot Paver Laid $63,324.80 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Cove to Micro Surface FY07 Mystic Sunrise 17 Sunrise Cove- from Hot Paver Laid $17,780.00 Scheduled for Public Works Summer Fest to Micro Surface FY08 Sunrise Creek 1g Sunrise Cove- from Hot Paver Laid $40,820.00 Scheduled for Public Works Summer Fest to Micro Surface FY08 Glacier Sun 1g Sunrise Creek- from Hot Paver Laid $69,120.00 Scheduled for Public Works Summer Fest to Micro Surface FY08 Glacier Sun 20 Country Sun- from Hot Paver Laid Mi- $29,635.20 Scheduled for Public Works Misty Springs to cro Surface FY08 Dead End ~9 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 21 Hickory Sun- from Micro Surface $13,789.84 Completed Public Works Cactus Sun to Dead End 22 Three Springs- from Hot Paver Laid Mi- $13,132.80 Scheduled for Public Works Misty Springs to cro Surface FY08 Dead End 23 Gallery Sun- from Micro Surface $28,347.96 Completed Public Works Glacier Sun to Dead End 24 Dakota Sun- from Micro Surface $19,540.82 Completed Public Works Cactus Sun to Dead End 25 Meadow Sunrise- Hot Paver Laid Mi- $11,088.00 Scheduled for Public Works from Summer Cove cro Surface FY08 to Dead End 2C Glacier Sun- from Micro Surface $47,672.94 Completed Public Works Mystic Sunrise to Sunrise Cove 27 Hawaiian Sun- from Hot Paver Laid Mi- $29,779.20 Scheduled for Public Works Misty Springs to cro Surface FY08 Dead End 28 Colonial Sun- from Full Depth Recla- $15,857.00 Completed Public Works Glacier Sun to Dead mation End 2g Frontier Sun- from Micro Surface $12,518.56 Completed Public Works Cactus Sun to Dead End 30 Comanche Sunrise- Micro Surface $34,273.91 Scheduled for Public Works from Mission Sunrise FY08 to Mission Sunrise March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PROJECT PROJECT PRO]ECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 31 Sun Falls- from Micro Surface $26,448.92 Completed Public Works Cactus Sun to Dead End 32 Indian Sunrise- from Micro Surface $32,586.18 Scheduled for Public Works Mission Sunrise to FY08 Glacier Sun 33 Prairie Sun- from Micro Surface $10,152.35 Scheduled for Public Works Glacier Sun to FY08 Dead End 34 Hunters Sun- from Micro Surface $7,192.33 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Village to FY08 Sunrise Bend 35 Sunrise Glade- from Micro Surface $21,862.60 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise View to FY08 Sunrise Bend 36 Cedar Springs -from Micro Surface $5,738.41 Completed Public Works Misty Springs to Dead End 37 Sunrise Pass- from Micro Surface $49,237.37 Completed Public Works Cactus Sun to Glacier Sun 38 Sun Bay- from Sun Micro Surface $22,174.18 Scheduled for Public Works Canyon to FY08 Sunshine Park 39 Sun Farm- from Sun- Micro Surface $23,160.85 Scheduled for Public Works shine Park to Sun FY08 Canyon 40 Sun Harbor- from Micro Surface $12,463.24 Scheduled for Public Works Glacier Sun to Hid- FY08 den Sunrise ~Y March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PROJECT SCOPE PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT OR PROJECT LIMITS BUDGET STATUS AGENCY 41 Sun Harbor- from Micro Surface $19,837.32 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Creek to FY08 Hidden Sunrise 42 Enchanted Sun- from Micro Surface $18,204.00 Completed Public Works Glacier Sun to Dead End 43 Sunrise Bluff- from Micro Surface $9,762.87 Scheduled for Public Works Glacier Sun to FY08 Dead End 44 Sunrise Cliff- from Micro Surface $4,673.72 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Cove to FY08 Dead End 45 Sunrise Creek- from Micro Surface $31,080.20 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Cove to FY08 Summer Fest 46 Sunrise Crest- from Micro Surface $15,579.05 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Bend to FY08 Dead End 47 Sunrise Village- from Micro Surface $7,685.66 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Point to FY08 Hunters Sun 48 Spring Sun- from Sun Micro Surface $23,264.71 Scheduled for Public Works Canyon to Dead End FY08 49 Mission Sunrise- from Micro Surface $15,215.54 Scheduled for Public Works Coral Sunrise to Fy08 Indian Sunrise 50 Burning Sunrise- Micro Surface $27,756.67 Scheduled for Public Works from Sunrise Creek to Fl(pg Mystic Sunrise March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 51 Sunshine Peak- from Micro Surface $9,027.31 Completed Public Works Summer Fest to Dead End 52 Cold Springs- from Micro Surface $2,683.81 Completed Public Works Misty Springs to Dead End 53 Sunrise Laurel- from Micro Surface $3,990.73 Completed Public Works Summer Fest to Dead End 54 Alaskan Sunrise- Micro Surface $25,653.50 Scheduled for Public Works from Sunrise Bend to FY08 Burning Sunrise 55 Sunrise View- from Micro Surface $7,789.53 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Terrace to FY08 Sunrise Glade 56 Sunrise Terrace- Micro Surface $18,876.62 Scheduled for Public Works from Sunrise Bend to FY08 Sunrise View 57 ]ones Fall- Misty Micro Surface $25,471.75 Scheduled for Public Works Springs to FY08 Dead End 5g Sunrise Point- from Micro Surface $18,980.48 Scheduled for Public Works Sunrise Bend to FY08 Sunrise Village 5g Sunshine Park- from Micro Surface $8,334.79 Scheduled for Public Works Sun Bay to Sun Farm FY08 60 Corner Parkway- Full Depth Recla- $93,069.60 Scheduled for Public Works from Loop 410 NFR mation FY09 to Cornerway March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME & PR03ECT PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT PROJECT LIMITS SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY 61 Seguin- from Binz- Asphalt Overlay $96,665.87 Completed Public Works Engleman to IH-35 62 Bicentennial- from Full Depth $136,904.00 Scheduled for Public Works Ackerman to IH-10 Reclamation 2010 63 Fire Sun- from Glacier Micro Surface $14,054.69 Completed Public Works Sun to Dead End 64 Donshire (Northham) Concrete Pavement $26,086.67 Completed Public Works 7931 Donshire Reconstruction 65 Dietrich- from Loop Base and Pavement $40,781.33 Scheduled for Public Works 410 to Ackerman Repair FY09 66 Dietrich- from Base and Pavement $26,130.67 Completed Public Works Ackerman to IH-10 Repair 67 Springfield- from Full Depth $82,600.00 Scheduled for Public Works Loop 410 to FM 78 Reclamation 2010 6g Sun Canyon- from Full Depth $29,175.83 Completed Public Works Spring Sun to Reclamation Sun Fall NAMP 69 Lakeview- from High- Speed Humps $13,100.00 Completed Public Works land Farms to 7ackie Farms CIP 70 East Gate Drainage ROW acquisition $14,400.00 Completed Public Works Improvements only (Drainage) March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan PROJECT NAME PROJECT PROJECT PROJECT DEPARTMENT & PROJECT SCOPE BUDGET STATUS OR AGENCY LIMITS CIP 71 Ackerman- From IH- Reconstruct existing $2,379,000.00 Completed Public Works 10 to Dietrich two lane roadway to 4 lanes (44-61' concrete) pavement, with additional turn- ing lanes at IH-10 (528 feet) SPEED HUMPS 72 Sun Canyon- from Sun Canyon- from $10,200.00 Completed Public Works Spring Sun to Spring Sun to Spring Falls Spring Falls 73 Lake View- from Lake View- from $13,100.00 Completed Public Works Jackie Farms to Jackie Farms to Jughland Farm Jughland Farm 74 Summer Fest- Summer Fest- Misty $13,100.00 Completed Public Works Misty Springs to Springs to Sun Canyon Sun Canyon 75 Summer Fest- from Summer Fest- from $13,100.00 Completed Public Works Sunrise Creek to Sunrise Creek to Sunrise Cove Sunrise Cove 7C Summer Fest- from Summer Fest- from $10,500.00 Completed Public Works Mystic Sunrise to Mystic Sunrise to Sunrise Creek Sunrise Creek 77 Donshire- from Donshire- from $7,900.00 Completed Public Works Manderly to Manderly to Chestnut Manor Chestnut Manor EXISTING SCHOOL ZONE FLASHING BEACONS 78 Crosswalk on Lake- Crosswalk on Lake- $14,000.00 Completed Public Works view for Paschall ES view for Paschall ES NEW SCHOOL ZONE 79 Woodlake Parkway Woodlake Parkway $1,400.00 Scheduled for Public Works for Woodlake Hills for Woodlake Hills FY05 MS MS 55 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan APPEN®'X ~i: RES®uR~iES The following list is a quick reference to some of the organizations referenced in this Perimeter Plan. General City Information can also be obtained at www.sanantonio.gov City of San Antonio Customer Service: 311 City of San Antonio Code Compliance Division AACOG -Alamo Area Council of Governments 207-8200 362-5200 City of San Antonio -City Council District 2 AARP 207-7278 348-8687 City of San Antonio -Community Initiatives Animal Care Services 207-8190 207-6650 City of San Antonio -Cultural Affairs AVANCE 222-2787 220-1788 City of San Antonio -Development Services Bexar Humane Society 207-1111 226-7461 City of San Antonio -Economic Development Bexar Land Trust 207-8080 222-8430 City of San Antonio -Library Division Boy Scouts 207-2500 341-8611 City of San Antonio -Master Gardeners City of Converse 467-6575 658-5356 City of San Antonio -Neighborhood Services City of Converse -Public Library 207-5400 659-4160 City of San Antonio -Parks and Recreation City of Kirby 207-8297 661-3198 City of San Antonio City of Saint Hedwig Planning & Community Development 667-9568 207-7873 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan City of San Antonio -Police Department Gladys Harborth Animal Resource Emergency - 911 351-SPAY (7729) Non-Emergency - 207-7273 East Substation SAFFE Officer - 207-7566 Judson Independent School District 945-5100 City of San Antonio -Public Works 207-8068 KSAB Keep San Antonio Beautiful, Inc, City of San Antonio -Solid Waste Management 207-6460 207-6428 Metropolitan Health District City of Schertz 207-8780 619-1000 MPO City of Schertz -Public Library Metropolitan Planning Organization 619-1700 230-6902 Conservation Society Neighborhood Resource Center 224-6163 735-0586 COPS /Metro Alliance Our Lady of the Lake University Citizens Organized for Public Service 434-6711 222-2367 Project Quest CPS Energy -Emergency 270-4690 353-4357 Randolph Field Independent School District CPS Energy -General 357-2300 353-2222 SARA East Central Independent School District San Antonio Housing Authority 648-7861 477-6133 Esperanza Peace and Justice Center SARA 228-0201 San Antonio River Authority 227-1373 Fire Department 207-8492 San Antonio College 733-2000 Girl Scouts 228-0815 San Antonio Independent School District 299-5500 March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan Schertz - Cibolo -Universal City Independent School District 945-6200 Small Business First Point 207-3900 SNAP Spay/Neuter Animal Program 673-7722 St. Mary's University 436-3011 TX Diabetes Institute 358-7000 Texas Commission on Environmental Quality 490-3096 United Way 352-7000 US Corp of Engineers 817-978-2300 UTSA University of Texas, San Antonio 458-4011 UTSA Small Business Development 800-689-1912 5~ March 2008 Land Use Plan Update IH 10 East Perimeter Plan RESOLUTION NO. 08-02-02 RECOMMENDING TO APPROVE/ AN AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE IH 10 E CORRIDOR PERIMETER PLAN TO CITY COUNCIL TO BECOME A COMPONENT OF THE CITY'S COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN AS IT CONFORMS TO THE APPROVAL CRITERIA SET FORTH IN THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, §35-420, PERTAII~IING TO "COMPREHENSIVE, NEIGHBORHOOD, COMMi7NTTY, AND PERIMETER PLANS." WHEREAS, the 1997 Master Plan Neighborhood Goa12 calls for strengthening neighborhood plans; and WHEREAS, the San Antonio Planning Commission has approved the 1998 Community Building and Neighborhood Planning Program; and WHEREAS, the Unified Development Code (adopted May 3, 2001), §35-420, sets forth provisions for the development and approval of Comprehensive, Neighborhood, Community and Perimeter Plans and requires the Plan shall be reviewed by the planning commission at least once every five years; and WHEREAS, the San Antonio Planning Commission has reviewed the amendment to update the land use element of the Ili 10 E Corridor Perimeter Plan and found the amendment to be CONSISTENT with City policies, plans and regulations and in conformance with the Unified Development Code, §35-420, therefore meeting all requirements; and WHEREAS, the San Antonio Plarming Commission held a public hearing on February 13, 2008 and APPROVED the amendment; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO: SECTION l: The amendment to update the land use element of the IEi 10 E Corridor Perimeter Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference is to be submitted to the City Council with this Commission's recommendation for APPROVAL by the City Council that it be adopted as a component to the City's Comprehensive Master Plan. PASSED AND APPROVED ON THIS 13'~ DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2008. Ap roved• 4 Murray H. Van Eman, Chairman San Antonio Planning Commission Attu Executive Secretary San Antonio Planning Commrssion 59 SG: 03-2a-a8 Master Plan Amendment Item No. P-i. IH 10 E Perimeter Plan AN ORDINANCE 2 0 0 8- O 3- 2 0- 0 2 31 AMENDING THE LAND USE PLAN IN THE IH 10 EAST PERIMETER PLAN, A COMPONENT OF THE MASTER PLAN OF THE CITY, BY UPDATING THE .LAND USE ELEMENT IN AN AREA GENERALLY BOUNDED BY GIBBS SPRAWL AND THE SAN ANTONIO ETJ TO THE NORTH, CIBOLO CREEK TO THE EAST, THE SAN ANTONIO ETJ AND FM 1346 TO THE SOUTH, AND LOOP 410 TO THE WEST WHEREAS, the 1H 10 E Corridor Perimeter Plan was first adopted by City Council on February 22, 2001 as a component of the City Master Plan adopted May 29, 1997; and WHEREAS, according to §35-420 of the Unified Development Code, the Plan shall be reviewed by Planning Commission at least once every five years, and WHEREAS, the IH 10 E Perimeter Plan area includes approximately 56 square miles and is generally bound by Gibbs Sprawl and the San Antonio ETJ to the north, Cibolo Creek to the east, the San Antonio ETJ and FM 1346 to the south and Loop 410 to the west; and WHEREAS, the San Antonio Planning Commission reviewed the II3 10 E Perimeter Plan Update on February 13, 2008 and found the plan to be consistent with City policies, plans and regulations and in conformance with the Unified Development Code, §35-420, therefore meeting all requirements; and WHEREAS, in a public hearing held on February 13, 2008, the Planning Commission recommended that the City Council amend the 1H 10 E Corridor Perimeter Plan to update the land use element as an addendum to the Master Plan adopted May 29, 1997; NOW THEREFORE: BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN ANTONIO: SECTION 1. The IH 10 E Perimeter Plan is hereby updated by amending the Land Use Element in the 1H 10 E Perimeter Plan adopted February 22, 2001, as a component of the Master Plan of the City, generally bound by Gibbs Sprawl and the San Antonio ETJ to the north, Cibolo Creek to the east, the San Antonio ETJ and FM 1346 to the south and Loop 410 to the west. A copy of the plan is attached hereto and incorporated by reference as Attachment I. SECTION 2. This ordinance shall take effect March 30, 2008. PASSED AND APPROVED on this 20th day of March 2008. ~~'~~~DGII~ ~ l~kL~7~ MAYOR ATTEST: ~GCl,C~t/ City Clerk PHIL HARDBERtiER APPROVED AS TO FORM: ~ ,~.J~,.,o,eC~~JlA.1t..~- ~City Attorney