Loading...
PZ 01-11-2017 AGENDA w associated documentsSCHERTZ CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE AND PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 City of Schertz Core Values Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you would want to be treated Work together cooperatively as a team 1. CALL TO ORDER I ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 2. PRESENTATIONS A. Recognition of Newly Appointed Committee Members 3. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Hold a public hearing, consider and file the semi - annual report for October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016, evaluating the progress of the city on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. B. Hold a public hearing, consider and file the semi - annual report for April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016, evaluating the progress of the city on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. . . / • 1. CALL TO ORDER l ROLL CALL THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING 2. PRESENTATIONS A. Recognition of Newly Appointed P &Z Commissioner Planning & Zoning January 11, 2017 Page 1 of 3 B. Service recognition for Commissioner Crawford 3. HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes for the December 16, 2015, January 13, 2016, April 27, 2016 and October 12, 2016 regular meetings. 5. PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant's request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary. A. ZC2016 -014 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a request to rezone 611 & 615 Main Street, approximately 1 acre of land, from Single Family Residential District (R -2) to Main Street Mixed Use district (MSMU). B. ZC2016 -008 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a request to zone approximately 63 acres of land to Public Use District. The site is located off Trainer Hale Road, approximately 600 feet north of 1 -10, specifically at 7424 Trainer Hale Road. 6. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda. B. Announcements by Commissioners. • City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended C. Announcements by City Staff. • City Staff Update • City and community events attended and to be attended. • NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following site plans were submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department between December 9, 2016 and January 6, 2017. 1) Rose Garden Elementary Replacement (10414 E FM 1518) Site Plan — proposed 154,151 Sq. Ft. Elementary School 2) OJR RW P P (1.2423 Authority Lane) Site plan — proposed expansion to the existing wastewater treatment facility • 20164 th Quarter Report • December 2016 Monthly Financial Report Planning & Zoning January 11, 2017 Page 2 of 3 • Information on Rough Proportionality Requests that have been granted to date (Linear Feet of Roadway) 7. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING CERTIFICATION I, Emily Grobe, Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 6 1 day of January, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code. E (vro4v, Emily Grobe, Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on day of , 2017. title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619 -1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. Planning & Zoning January 11, 2017 Page 3 of 3 TO: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee THROUGH: Brian James, Executive Director PREPARED BY: Rene Zarate, Senior Accountant, James Walters, Finance Director Section 395.058 (c) (4) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to file semi - annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing impact fees. Section 90- 158 of the City's Code of Ordinance includes this same requirement. The attached report is the semi - annual report from October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CIAC accept this report and file the semi - annual report with City Council. The semi- annual report will consist of the items presented to the CIAC and the draft minutes from this meeting. Attachments: Impact Fee Report October 1, 2015 through March 31, 2016 CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT OCTOBER 1, 2015 TO MARCH 31, 2016 Oct 1, 2015 to Mar 31, 2016 Beginning Impact Fee Balance Revenues: Expenses: Impact Fees 1 Interest Earned 2 Investments Income 3 Capital One - Investment Income 4 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 5 Transferred Out s Total Revenue Over /(Under) Expense Ending Impact Fee Balance * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IMPACTS FEES * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Water Sewer Total 5,930,600.06 4,433,400.33 10,364,000.39 462,105.00 230,001.36 692,106.36 316.80 206.36 523.16 8,249.26 3,631.97 11,881.23 0.00 10, 954.73 10, 954.73 0.00 2,160.03 2,160.03 366,594.84 0.00 366,594.84 104,076.22 242,634.39 346,710.61 6,034,676.28 4,676,034.72 10,710,711.00 Impact Fees collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 2 Bank Interest collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016. Based on ending bank cash balance. 3 Investment Income collected between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 Water and Sewer have separate investment accounts. 4 Investment Income from the Capital One investment for Sewer recorded between Oct, 1 2015 through Mar 31, 2016. 5 Investment Mgt Fee charged for the Capital One Investment between Oct 1, 2015 through Mar 31, 2016 6 Transferred revenue to Fund 406 Water /Sewer Projects Fund. (To fund the East Live Oak Water Plant Upgrades) 12 -20 -2016 12:15 PM 421 - CAPITAL RECOVERY - SEWER ACCT# ACCOUNT NAME C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z TRIAL BALANCE AS OF: MARCH 31ST, 2016 * ** MONTH TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS ASSETS 000 - 110000 Claim on Cash Cap Recov Sewer 33,782.87 000 - 116200.204 Inv L Star - Capital Rec Sewer 992.08 000 - 116200.403 Inv Acct Sewer - Capital One 3,839.47 LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 000 - 340000 Retained Earnings 0.00 REVENUES 000 - 455910 Cap Rcvey -Waste Water 000 - 455913 Cap Rcvey -North Sewer Treat 000 - 491000 Interest Earned 000 - 491200 Investment Income 000 - 491800 Gain /Loss Capital One Sewer 000 - 491900 Unrealize Gain /Loss -Captl One EXPENDITURES 101- 541650 Investment Mgt Fee -Sewer 361.46 * ** TOTALS * ** * ** END OF REPORT * ** 28,356.00 5,400.00 26.87 3,969.26 209.96 1,013.79 38,975.88 38,975.88 PAGE: 1 * ** YEAR TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 569,972.35 2,357,777.43 1,748,284.96 4,433,400.33 210,201.36 19,800.00 206.37 22,937.41 29,620.02 21,269.32 2,160.03 4,707,814.79 4,707,814.79 TO: Capital Improvements Advisory Committee THROUGH: Brian James, Executive Director PREPARED BY: Rene Zarate, Senior Accountant, James Walters, Finance Director Section 395.058 (c) (4) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to file semi - annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvements plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing impact fees. Section 90- 158 of the City's Code of Ordinance includes this same requirement. The attached report is the semi - annual report from April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CIAC accept this report and file the semi - annual report with City Council. The semi- annual report will consist of the items presented to the CIAC and the draft minutes from this meeting. Attachments: Impact Fee Report April 1, 2016 through September 30, 2016 CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT APRIL 1, 2016 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 2016 Apr 1, 2016 to Sept 30, 2016 Beginning Impact Fee Balance * * * * * * * * * * * * ** IMPACTS FEES * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Water Sewer Total 6,034,676.28 4,676,034.72 10,710,711.00 Revenues: Impact Fees 489,978.00 278,335.29 768,313.29 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 2 185.00 135.05 320.05 Investments Income 3 16,216.33 7,653.16 23,869.49 Capital One - Investment Income 4 0.00 8,657.66 8,657.66 Misc Income 0.00 (494.41) (494.41) Reimbursement 0.00 0.00 0.00 Expenses: CCMA- NorthCliffe Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor /Accounting Services 5 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 6 0.00 2,179.47 2,179.47 Transferred Out 3,050,000.00 139,312.00 3,189,312.00 LAND /ROW (500.00) 0.00 (500.00) Total Revenue Over /(Under) Expense (2,544,120.67) 151,795.28 (2,392,325.39) Ending Impact Fee Balance 3,490,555.61 4,827,830.00 8,318,385.61 Impact Fees collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 2 Bank Interest collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016. Based on ending bank cash balance. 3 Investment Income collected between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 Water and Sewer have separate investment accounts. 4 Investment Income from the Capital One investment for Sewer recorded between Apr, 1 2016 through Sept 30, 2016. s Auditor Services performed during the year. 6 Investment Mgt Fee charged for the Capital One Investment between Apr 1, 2016 through Sept 30, 2016 12 -20 -2016 01:13 PM 411 - CAPITAL RECOVERY - WATER ACCT# ACCOUNT NAME ASSETS 000 - 110000 Claim on Cash Cap Recov Water 000 - 116200.203 Inv L Star - Capital Rec Water 000 - 142404 Due From Capital Projects Fund LIABILITIES AND FUND BALANCE 000 - 340000 Retained Earnings REVENUES 000 - 455900 Cap Rcvey -Water 000 - 491000 Interest Earned 000 - 491200 Investment Income EXPENDITURES C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z TRIAL BALANCE AS OF: SEPTEMBER 30TH, 2016 * ** MONTH TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 98,803.61 3,046,662.11 0.00 0.00 98,289.00 14.61 3,337.89 101- 541400 Auditor /Accounting Service 0.00 900 - 548406 Transfer Out - Public Imprvment 3,050,000.00 900 - 581010 LAND /ROW 500.00 * ** TOTALS * ** * ** END OF REPORT * ** 3,148,803.61 3,148,603.61 PAGE: 1 * ** YEAR TO DATE * ** DEBITS CREDITS 401,045.08 2,973,470.53 116,040.00 5,930,600.06 952,083.00 501.80 24,465.59 1,000.00 3,416,594.84 500.00 6,908,150.45 6,908,150.45 PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES December 16, 2015 A Regular Meeting was held by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 16, 2015 at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION David Richmond, Chairman Ken Greenwald Bert Crawford, Jr. Richard Brand Michael Dahle Christian Glombik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Ernie Evans, Vice- Chairman 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Richmond called the meeti HEARING OF RESIDENTS • No one spoke. CONSENT AGENDA A. MINUTES FOR THE I NOVEMBER 18, 2015. Mr. Crawford motioned to apl was 4 -0 with Mr. Glombik and PUBLIC HEARING A. PC2015 -023 Hold a public 1 at Forest Ridge three (3) lots. County, Texas. CITY STAFF Brian James, Executive Director Development Lesa Wood, Senior Planner Bryce Cox, Planner I order at 6: TINGS FOR SEPTEMBER 23, 2015 AND t agenda. Mr. Dahle seconded the motion. Vote abstaining. Motion carried. der and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Legacy Lot 3, Block 2, consisting of approximately 10 acres, establishing is located at 5001 Schertz Parkway, City of Schertz, Guadalupe City Staff gave a presentation and recommended approval of the replat. Public hearing was held. Mr. Dahle motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Greenwald seconded the motion. Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION Minutes P &Z Meeting December 16, 2015 Page 1 of 4 A. PC2015 -021 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead Subdivision Unit 1A, an approximately 48 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471, and the P. San Miguel Survey No. 256, Abstract 227, City of Schertz, Comal County and Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on IH -35 North approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of HI -35 North and Schwab Road. City Staff gave a presentation and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Dahle motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. B. PC2015 -027 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead Subdivision Unit 1B, an approximately 23 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 685, J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471 and the P. San Miguel Survey No. 256, Abstract 227,, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on IH -35 North approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of HI -35 North and Schwab Road. City Staff gave a presentation and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Greenwald motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Brand seconded the motion. Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. C. PC2015 -031 Consider and acl Subdivision Unit Survey No. 257, � Miguel Survey T generally located HI -35 North and City Staff gave a press Mr. Crawford motione was 6 -0. Motion carri D. PC2015 -029 upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead 1, an approximately 19 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda bstract 685, J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471 and the P. San o. 256, Abstract 227, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, on IH -35 North approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of chwab Road. and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. this item as presented. Mr. Glombik seconded the motion. Vote Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead Subdivision Unit 3A, an approximately 17 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 685, J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471 and the P. San Miguel Survey No. 256, Abstract 227, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on IH -35 North approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of HI -35 North and Schwab Road. Minutes P &Z Meeting December 16, 2015 Page 2 of 4 City Staff gave a presentation and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Dahle motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. E. PC2015 -030 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead Subdivision Unit 3B, an approximately 16 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 685, J.F. Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471 and the P. San Miguel Survey No. 256, Abstract 227, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on IH -35 North approximately 2,000 feet west of the intersection of HI -35 North and Schwab Road. City Staff gave a presentation and rec Mr. Greenwald motioned to approve Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. F. PC2015 -028 Consider and act upon a regi Subdivision Unit 4, an appro. Survey No. 257, Abstract 685, . Miguel Survey No. 256, Abi generally located on IH -35 N HI -35 North and Schwab Roy City Staff gave a — Rout r and at Schertz Su located at 54( City Staff gave a rec preliminary plat. presented. Mr. Glombik seconded the motion. for approval of a preliminary plat of the Homestead itely 17 acre tract of land situated in the J.F. Zapeda Zapeda Survey No. 257, Abstract 471 and the P. San ,t 227, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, . approximately 2.000 feet west of the intersection of approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Dahle seconded the motion. Vote h Proportionality on roadway construction associated with PC2015 -039 act upon a request for approval of a waiver regarding rough on roadway construction related to the preliminary plat of the Reserve livision, Unit 4, Lot 41, Block 13, an approximately 31 acre tract of land North Gravtown Road. and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Greenwald motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. Vote was 6 -0. Motion carried. H. PC2015 -039 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Reserve at Schertz Subdivision Unit 4, an approximately 31 acre tract of land situated in the Antonio Zamora Survey No. 36, Abstract No. 828, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas, located at 5408 North Graytown Road. Minutes P &Z Meeting December 16, 2015 Page 3 of 4 City Staff gave a presentation and recommended approval of the preliminary plat. Mr. Crawford motioned to approve this item as presented. Mr. Dahle seconded the motion. Vote was 5 -1 with Mr. Greenwald voting nay. Motion carried. 7.. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda. • No requests from the Commissioners. B. Announcements by Commissioners. • No announcements from C. Announcements by City Staff. • A workshop/ discussion will be plac Development Code Article 11 Signs • A workshop/ discussion will be place, Shed Building Code Amendments. • An update on Department Staffing wi 8. ADJO The meeting adjourned at 6:30 P.M. Minutes P &Z Meeting December 16, 2015 Page 4 of 4 ;xt meeting agenda regarding Unified ising Devices. meeting agenda regarding Fence and the next meeting. Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES January 13, 2016 A Regular Meeting was held by the Planning and Zoning Commission on January 13, 2016 at 6:00 P.M. the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION David Richmond, Chairman Ken Greenwald Bert Crawford, Jr. Richard Brand Michael Dahle COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Ernest Evans Jr., Vice Chairman Christian Glombik 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Richmond called the meeting 2. HEARING OF RESIDENTS • No one spoke. 3. PUBLIC HEAL A. ZC2015 -008 CITY STAFF Brian James, Executive Director Development Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Bryce Cox, Planner I Business Center LP, Sanjay Misra Engineers LLC, Jim Clements I�� ial Joint Venture, John Greenwood and Surveying, Bobby Torres LTD, James Horne t Comoration.. James Horne Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land in the Verde Enterprise Business Park Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance 07- S-14A to Planned Development District (PDD). The property is specifically Lot 2, Block 13 of the Verde Enterprise Business Park Unit 11 subdivision and generally located on Schertz Parkway approximately 250 feet north of the intersection of Schertz Parkway and IH -35 in the City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mr. Cox gave a presentation about a proposal to rezone approximately 2.1 acres of land in the Verde Enterprise Business Park Planned Unit Development. Five (5) public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners on December 30, 2015. At the time of this staff report no responses have been received. The request is to develop Lot 2, Block 13 of Unit 11 in accordance with the existing PUD Ordinance 07 -S -14A with the exception to the building setback adjacent to property located outside that is commercial or industrial. The request is to rezone the subject property to modify the development standards to change the building setback from a perimeter lot line of property outside of the PUD from 50' to 20'. Staff recommends approval of the zoning request. Mr. Richmond opened the public hearing at 6:06pm. No one spoke and Mr. Richmond closed the public hearing at 6:07pm. Minutes P &Z Meeting January 13, 2016 Page 1 of 5 Mr. Crawford asked what would be developed on this lot. Mr. Cox responded that the applicant has discussed constructing a hotel on this site. Mr. Dahle moved to recommend approval of ZC2015 -008 to City Council. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. B. PC2015 -036 Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Cottonwood II Subdivision Lots 1 & 2, Block 1, consisting of approximately 3 acres, establishing two (2) lots. The property is generally located on Schertz Parkway approximately 450 feet north of the intersection Schertz Parkway and Live Oak Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas Mr. Cox presented a request for approval of a Block 1, consisting of approximately 3 acres, is to provide a public right -of -way between Li lots will have access onto the new roadway be a tree affidavit which indicates that the site do be removed. The civil construction plans have Departments. Water and Sewer: Schertz Parkway. future develonmet Drainage: The for compliance This site is curr( U 8" water line is Water )Iat of the Cottonwood II Subdivision Lots I & 2, tablishing two (2) lots. The purpose of this replat 1 and 2 to provide access to Schertz Parkway. The created with this plat. The applicant has submitted ,ontain protected or heritage trees but no trees will en reviewed by the Public Works and Engineering by existing 16" water line and 12" sewer line on extended down Mare Way and stubbed out for drainage associated with the subject property, and ;ions. A storm water management plan has been Sidewalks Hike and Bike Trails: Sidewalks along Schertz Parkway currently exist and meet the City of Schertz specifications. Sidewalks are required along Mare Way and will be constructed with the development of the property. All sidewalks will be designed to meet the City of Schertz Road Improvements: Schertz Parkway is an improved road and does not require any additional improvements or ROW dedications. Mare Way will be developed to City of Schertz specifications. Construction plans for all public improvements have been approved by Public Works and Engineering. Staff recommends approval of this request. Mr. Richmond opened the public hearing at 6:12pm. No one spoke and Mr. Richmond closed the public hearing at 6:13pm. Mr. Braud asked if there would be any access or exit restrictions on Mares Way. Mr. Cox responded that Mares Way would be frill access. Mr. Dahle asked if there would be an acceleration lane for Minutes P &Z Meeting January 13, 2016 Page 2 of 5 right hand turns. Mr. Cox replied that Mares Way would be a standard local street and is not proposed to have a dedicated right hand turn lane. Mr. Crawford moved to approve the replat Cottonwood II Subdivision PC2016 -036. Mr. Dahle seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. 4. ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION: A. PC2015 -037 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Bindseil Farms Subdivision, an approximately 35 acre tract of land situated in the Toreiba Herrera Survey No. 68, Abstract No. 153; G. Malpez Survey No. 67, Abstract No. 221, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located northwest of the intersection of Live Oak Road and Schertz Parkway. Mr. Cox presented a request for approval of an approximately 35 acre tract of land, gener, Road and Schertz Parkway. The applicant is of land establishing 84 single family residenti Road being extended from the intersection at c Creek and intersecting with Maske Road. The and accepted by the City and the replat of Co plat of Bindseil Farms will be recorded. The heritage trees will be removed from this si subdivision. The site is serviced by Schertz and Time Warner Cable. The civil constructs o Works and f Water and eliminary plat of the Bindseil Farms Subdivision, located northwest of the intersection of Live Oak posing to preliminary plat approximately 35 acres S. The Master Thoroughfare Plan shows Live Oak rtz Parkway northwest along the edge of the Dietz nectin2 section of Mare Wav� must be constructed Cott 11 subdivision must be recorded before a final tree affidavit submitted indicates that no protected or te. There is no parkland being proposed with this water ;and sewer, GVEC, CenterPoint Energy, AT &T, n plans must be reviewed and approved by the Public approval of the final plat. 8" water lines and 8" sewer lines that will be Drainage: The applicant is responsible for all drainage associated with the subject property and for compliance with the Storm Water regulations. A drainage report has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. The City Engineer has granted a waiver to onsite detention based on storm water. The project engineer has demonstrated that that there is no adverse effect created by releasing storm water into the Dietz Creek channel. Additionally, approximately 10 acres of drainage ROW will be dedicated to the City. Sidewalks Hike and Bike Trails: Sidewalks will be constructed along both sides of the street throughout the subdivision and along the Live Oak Road Extension. All sidewalks will be designed to meet the City of Schertz specifications. Road Improvements: All streets will be developed to City of Schertz specifications. A 60' ROW dedication has been provided for the extension of Live Oak Road from Schertz Parkway to the limits of the proposed subdivision. Construction plans for all public improvements will be submitted and approved by Public Works and Engineering prior to approval of the final plat. Staff recommends approval of the preliminary plat as submitted Minutes P &Z Meeting January 13, 2016 Page 3 of 5 Mr. Richmond, Mr. Crawford, Mr. Greenwald, and Mr. Braud asked questions regarding access and construction of Live Oak Road and sidewalks and hike and bike trails along Live Oak Road. Mr. Cox, Ms. Wood, and Mr. James responded to the questions and concerns. Mr. Greenwald moved to approve PC201.5 -037. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. 5. WORKSHOP/DISCUSSION: A. 1:3 Public Hearing and discussion on Unified Advertising Devices. Mr. James gave a presentation on the unified Develc Advertising Devices. The presentation was focused at height on FM 3009, revisions to temporary signs and reF brief discussion between staff and the commissioners r( to regulate signs, temporary signs and digital signs. Mr future a draft revision to Article Ll Suns and Advertisir, Public Hearing and d Mr. James gave a pres proposing a code amen would not remove any James and the Comm required; Mr. James presen square feet. The 1 needing a permit.. structures. It is st, not permitting ac brief discussion b easements, concei criteria for a shed 6. REQUESTS AND ANl A. Requests by Con Minutes P &Z Meeting January 13, 2016 Page 4 of 5 Code Article 11 Signs and )ment Code Article 11 Signs and Fund the possible reduction in sign riting of the sign code. There was a ;arding the sign code format, ways James will be bring forward in the scussion on Fence and Shed Building Code Amendments. ntation on the Fence and Shed Building Code Amendments. Staff is Jment to not require a permit for replacing a fence. This amendment Fencing or shed restrictions or regulations. A discussion between Mr. ssion where they conversed abort concerns with encroaching over and that people would not follow the regulations if a permit was not iding the building code to not require a permit for a shed under 120 code generally exempts accessory structures under 200 feet from -r Schertz's local amendments require a permit for all accessory lion that 200 square feet is too large to not permit and recommends structures under 120 square feet and it is moveable. There was a VIr. Tames and the commissioners regarding placement of sheds in the safety of structures built without a permit, and discussion of the �s not require a permit. to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda. Mr. Crawford wanted to confirm that there would be more discussion regarding Live Oak Rd. in the future and Mr. James confirmed there would be. Mr. Richmond noted the new City Council meeting schedule. Announcements by Commissioners. • City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended There were no announcements by Commissioners. C. Announcements by City Staff. • City Staff Update City and community events attended and to be attended. NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following site plans were submitted to the Planning and Zoning Department between November 14, 2015 and December 11, 2015. 1) Schertz 3009 Market Subdivision, Lot 1, Block 1 (711 FM 3009) Site plan — proposed: 1,946 sq. ft. retail 2) Walmart Supercenter #3391 -00 Subdivision, Lot 6, Block 1 (6018 FM 3009) Site plan — proposed: 3,482 sq. ft. retail building 3) Tri- County Business & Industrial Park Unit 1, Lot 1, Block 3 (5926 Corridor Pkwy) Site plan — proposed: 28,750 sq. ft. industrial building expansion Mr. James mentioned and congratulated & Community Development. 5. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGI The meeting adjourned at 7:50 P.M. Chairman, Planning and Zoning C Minutes P &Z Meeting January 13, 2016 Page 5 of 5 TING promotion to Director of Planning Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES April 27, 2016 A Regular Meeting was held by the Planning and Zoning Commission on April 27, 2016 at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION David Richmond, Chairman Ernie Evans, Vice - Chairman Ken Greenwald Bert Crawford, Jr. Richard Brand Michael Dahle Christian Greenwald COMMISSIONERS ABSENT 1. CALL TO ORDER Mr. Richmond called the meeting 2. HEARING OF • No citizens 3. CONSENT AG Mr. Greenwald i for 7 CITY STAFF Brian James, Executive Director Development Lesa Wood, Director Planning and Community Bryce Cox, Senior Planner Channary Gould. Planner Busch, Storm Water Manager -1 Santee, City Attorney IERS PRESENT ,lie Tittenington / 1730 Schertz 5A Haile / 6308 FM 3009 / Aaenc I�� item for a discussion. Pkwy / Agenda Item 5A st for approval of a final plat and vacation of a 16' sanitary sewer ids Subdivision consisting of 12.14 acres, located on Schertz Wet north of Live Oak Road. Channary Gould, Planner, presented the final plat request. She explained the history of the preliminary plat and that this same final plat was approved previously on September 12, 2012 and that the plat was revised and administratively approved on May 1, 2013 . and had expired on May 1, 2015. She also noted that the plat document presented tonight is identical to the plat that was previously administratively approved. The commissioners had a discussion regarding the sewer / drainage easements, how they are identified / titled, the exact location of the easements, and how it is identified on the plat exhibit itself. City staff responded to the questions and concerns from the Commission. Mr. Cox identifies where the easements are located and confirms that all easements have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and are identical to the revised, approved final plat Minutes P &Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 1 of 6 that was approved and expired. Mr. Cox describes that the way the exhibit is presented including how the vacate easement is shown is typical practice. Mr. Cox clarifies that all items have been constructed and have been previously approved. Mr. Dahle moved to approve this item. Mr. Crawford seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: A. ZC2016 -004 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on a request to zone approximately 4.1.38 acres of land to Public Use District (PUB). The property is more specifically described as a portion of the William Bracken Survey No. 74, Abstract No. 43, Bexar County No. 5056, and the W.S. Bennett Survey No. 75, Abstract No. 61, Bexar County No. 5057, located all in Bexar County; located! approximately 3,000 feet east of the intersection of FM 151.8 and Rav Corbett Drive. Lesa Wood, Director, presented the propose owns the property and that it is located in the zoning change is to make the property zoned use. Six (6) Public Hearing Notices were in meeting no responses had been received. T published, the zoning request will run iconct at the May 3, 2016 City Council 'meeti Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land U neighborhood district. The property is currei add additional capacity for the development proposed elevated storage tank and has no at zoning request. She explained that the City currently 1, currently in the process of annexation, the proposed )lic Use, which can be used by the City, State, Federal d to surrounding property owners. At the time of the )ublic hearing notice for City Council has also been ,itlywith the annexation ordinance that will be heard The Zone Change has been reviewed with the 4ap, which shows this area as being zoned mixed use designated for an elevated storage tank, which would the area. Randolph Air Force Base has reviewed the ections to the location proposed. Staff recommends James Herrera- 12020 Schafer Road Mr. Herrera, adjacent property owner, asked about the 200 ft buffer and it entails. Mr. Evans clarifies that the 200 ft buffer is just a legal obligation that the City notifies that all property owners located within 200 ft of the subject property that an item is being discussed. Ernest Marshal: 1.2198 Schiffer Road Mr. Marshal questions the 200 ft buffer and the impact it will have on his property.Mr. Marshal also questions how large the proposed water storage tank will be. Mr. Evans clarifies that the 200ft buffer is just to mail out notices, that there is a potential rezone for an adjacent property. Mr. Evans clarifies that the buffer does not make an impact on anyone else's property. Mr. Richmond closes the public hearing at 6:24pm. Ms. Wood, addressing resident questions, clarifies that by state law we are required to notify all property owners within a 200ft notice of the zoning case. Ms. Wood also indicated that she confirmed Minutes P &Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 2 of 6 with the Engineering Department that the proposed tank is to hold 1.5 million gallons and is an elevated storage tank. The commissioners had a discussion regarding the elevation of the tank, the capacity of the tank in relation to existing City storage tanks, the logistics of how a ground storage tank is placed on the ground, and if the property will be platted in the future. Ms. Wood requests for Larry Busch of the Engineering department to come forward and answers some of the more specific questions on the tank, as she is not as familiar since this is just for the zoning of the property. Mr. Busch clarifies that they do not .know the exact elevation as it is very preliminary. However, they are trying to match the elevation of Live Oak storage tank. However, this proposed storage tank might be a little taller. There will also be a 3 million gallon ground storage tank with a pump station in the future. Mr. Busch clarifies that the ground storage tank at Live Oak is a 7.5 Million Gallon and the elevated storage tank at Live Oak is 1.5 Million Gallon Tank. Mr. Busch clarifies that the ground storage tanks typically do not go beneath the ground. It sits on top of the ground and will be roughly as tall as the ones on East Live Oak Road. Ms. Wood clarifies that the property will be platted in the future. Mr. Greenwald moved to make a seconded the motion. The vote w, 5. WORKSHOP / DISCUSSION:._ .. A. Discussion and uublic hearin Brian. James, Executive Director gave a Signs. Mr. James provided the following • If you have to read the sign to catel 1 to City Council for ZC2016 -004. Mr. Crawford Code, Article 11, Signs. Development Code, Article 1.1, lion points: t, that is a problem going forward. Current code says you can and cannot do signage is truly what the City would like to see. we generaiiy categorize our signs into wnat type of street the property is on. The faster the traffic, the larger the sign that is allowed. • Current code allows one sign per wall, which makes some developers try to connect more signs together which we view as only one sign. Proposing to change to not just one sign per wall but really how much signage or how many square feet of signs are we going to allow per side. • Currently, properties can have one sign per wall with a max of three signs for the whole building / only three sides are allowed to have signs. Considering a change that would build in more flexibility. Would not necessarily limit the number of signs or the number of walls but rather limit the maximum amount of sign on the building overall and the maximum amount of signage on any one side. • Looking to increasing the amount of signage but provide more flexibility to the property owner on how to use it. • The 15ft setback from the property line, has continually been an issue. Staff is looking at the site distance and might decrease to IOft from the property line. Minutes P &Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 3 of 6 Subdivision entrance signs, the height generally works, however the one sign for the entrance can be problematic when developers want to mirror signs on the end of the buffer rather than in the middle of the entrance. Currently do not allow bandit signs, this is not something that is going to change. However, for larger subdivisions/ master PDDs they face a challenge of the different builders in the various phases and to find the second or third phase starts. They would like to be able to include some signs to help direct to the later phases to allow signs that show where and who the builders are, however only in the subdivision itself. Want to come up with attractive and effective signage for both the developers and the residents. Real Estate signs and development signs are also a cot are listed on when they can be displayed. This is hat dimensions between the real estate signs and develo typically problematic. This goes back to, if you have estate sign, then this needs to be addressed. Another item that will be addressed is the temporary allows them to be left out. Current code allows for an that this could be shorter and still Let the same anneal. Mr. Richmond opens the public hearing at 6: Tyler Haile — 6308 FM 3009 — • Chick -fil -A has five sigl from. SnecificalIv. with is at, and he gels that more he does not want tons of si€ would really make a hu ae di -rn in regards to the time limits that for City staff to regulate. Also the ,-tent signs are different and this is > read the sign to know it is a real how long the current code period of time, staff thinks Chick- fil -A .on 3009 - ecently did a study of where customers were coming i he finds it difficult to explain where his restaurant y be beneficial. As a Schertz resident flexibility for the property owner Titteninjton 1730 Schertz Parkway Agrees with what Brian explained in his presentation and also understands Chick- fil -A's concerns. Fully supports Brian's proposal and thinks that the proposed changes would really benefit the whole look of the community. Mr. Richmond closed the Public Hearing at 7:03pm The commissioners had a discussion and asked questions in regards to the following: digitized signs and the standards around them, 180 day limit on temporary signs, development signs in subdivisions, max square foot per business, window signs. Additionally, the Commission requests that with the next presentation to have the track changes to review the proposed with the existing and to provide some visual examples of what the current ordinance allows. Mr. James provided additional information to the commissioners to clarify the questions presented. Listing that there is no proposed change to the digitized signs. He also explains the determination on if a sign is actually temporary. Mr. James also identifies that development signs are designed so that once the development is complete that these would be removed. Mr. James describes the use of window signs. Mr. James also explains that the current code is very black and white and at the time it was written it made sense. However, the expectation going forward is that the expectations will go up and the new codes will build in flexibility so staff can make more discretion Minutes P &Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 4 of 6 B. Discussion and public hearing related to tree mitigation and preservation. Brian James, Executive Director, gave a presentation on tree mitigation and tree preservation. Mr. James provided the following discussion points: • The ordinance currently reads as you have to mitigate based on the trees that are being removed. This usually works well except for the tracts of land that have not been farmed in many years that are currently covered with trees. • City Council has an idea that a certain point there is an excessive amount of mitigation fees for some of the properties. Recently the Parks Department is using the fees to help the growth of existing park trees and in the right of way. • Staff would recommend that there be a cap of how much the property owner would have to pay for some of the more wooded sites. Staff is requesting for P&Zs opinion on the instances where there is a more wooded site, should there be a capon the fees. Mr. Richmond opened the public Robert Brockman: 1000 Elbel Road • Believes that there has not been a good representation of tree mitigation in action. References the trees at the Walgreens that died and were never replaced and also mentions that originally the tree mitigation funds were to be used for planting more trees, however the Parks Board uses the funds for other items than just planting trees. Mr. Richmond closed the vublic hearing at 7 The commissioners had a discussion that included the following questions and concerns: how are current tree mitigation fees being used, the original concept and reasoning behind tree mitigation, loss of business due to high tree mitigation due, surrounding cities and their tree mitigation, pros and cons of changing the ordinance both for the developer and the City. Mr. James provided additional information to the commissioners to clarify the questions presented. Mr. James provided the following answer items, provided clarification on how the tree mitigation fees are and can be used to benefit the City in accordance with what the ordinance allows. The mitigation fee sometimes makes the developer more thoughtful, but in more cases it just causes agreements between the developer and the seller. Mr. Cox's noted that staff is constantly trying to work through with the developers on how can the trees be saved. Mr. James's also provides that there is a need for an ordinance that helps keep the canopy in the City, that if they cannot help with keeping the canopy then they should have to help pay for it, need an ordinance that makes people conscious of their placement. In his mind, if we have a way to spend it or not, that is beside the point, it is more of are the fees too high. We have to be more selective to ensure that 20 or 40 years from now they properties that we have planted trees will be able to be up kept and possibly replanted at that time. Ms. Woods provides that the City has lost out on any developments because of the tree mitigation- the southeast comer of Savannah and Schertz Pkwy was platted many years ago. There have been many pre development meetings on this lot but due to the high density of trees they have all decided Minutes P&Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 5 of 6 to develop elsewhere due to the size of the building would have to be so small it would not be economic. Mr. James's provides that all cities are different in the ordinance layout. Some cities say it is what it is and if the sites don't develop then they don't develop. There is a need for the tree mitigation . ordinance, the main focus of this discussion is really the heavily wooded areas and the developer that asks, "What could we have done better" and we can't give them an answer yet they still have to pay the very large fees. 6. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Requests by Commissioners to place items • None. B. Announcements by Commissioners. • Mr. Dahle meeting update, will be bringir Plan. • Mr. Greenwald inquiring about how the there was a considerable amount of peop' a few young men that stopped by the tat Richmond also mentioned that the preser • Mr. Crawford asking if staff can relook said we can put together 'a work statiai alternate would be. C. Announcements by City Staff. one. 8. ADJOURNMENT OF Chairman, Minutes P &Z Meeting April 27, 2016 Page 6 of 6 adjourned at 8:3 Planning and Zoning Agenda. a presentation on the newly adopted Strategic 'olunteer Fair went. Ms! Wood mentions that there. Mr. Richmond clarified that there were y that were interested in the Commission. Mr. ition was very good and so was the turn out. the alternates for the Commission. Mr. James to determine what the benefit of having the G and Zoning Commission Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES October 12, 2016 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on October 12, 2016 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION Ernie Evans, Vice Chairman Ken Greenwald Richard Braud Christian Glombik COMMISSIONERS ABSENT Michael Dahle Bert Crawford, Jr. David Richmond, Chairman 1. CALL TO ORDER/ROLL CALL Mr. Evans called the meeting to order at 6:01 P.M. 2. HEARING OF RE No citizen comments. K U CITY STAFF Brian James, Executive Director Lesa Wood, Director of Planning and Community Dev. Bryce Cox, Senior Planner Emily Grobe, Planner Channary Gould, Planner Engineers A. Waiver- Roadway Improvements associated with PC201.6 -035 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver to UDC Sec. 21.14.1.5 regarding improvements to Eckhardt Road related to the proposed final plat of the Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, an approximately 48 acre tract of land situated in the John Noyes Survey No. 259, Abstract No. 253, and the Carrol M. Gahogan; Jr. Survey No. 25, Abstract No. 142, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on the south east corner of Eckhardt Road and Froboese Road. Emily Grobe, l Planner, presented the waiver request. She explained that the applicant was requesting a waiver regarding the construction of roadway improvements on Eckhardt Road associated with the Parklands Subdivision. There was a brief discussion between staff and the Commission related to the length of the roadway improvements and the financial responsibility of the undeveloped improvements. Mr. Glombik motioned to approve the item. Mr. Greenwald seconded the motion. The vote was unanimous. Motion carried. B. PC2016 -035 The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1- Final Plat Consider and act upon a request for approval of a final plat of The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, an approximately 48 acre tract of land situated in the John Noyes Survey No. 259, Abstract No. 253, and the Carrol M. Gahogan, Jr. Survey No. 25, Abstract No. 142, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, generally located on the south east corner of Eckhardt Road and Froboese Road. Emily Grobe, Planner, presented the request. She explained that the applicant was requesting an approval of the final plat for the Parklands, Unit 1 establishing 113 single family residential lots. The plat is consistent Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission October 12, 2016 Page 1 of 2 4. 5. with all applicable regulations and ordinances and staff recommends approval. After a brief discussion between. Commission, Staff and the Applicant related to the number of lots in the subdivision and the detention lot, Mr. Braud moved to approve this item. Mr. Glombik seconded the motion. Vote was unanimous. Motion carried. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda. There were no Commissioner requests. B. Announcements by Commissioners • City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended There were no Commissioner announcements. C. Announcements by City Staff. • CCAB Update • City and community events attended and to be attended. • NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following new site plan application was submitted to the Planning Division between September 23, 2016 and October 7, 2016. 1. Homestead Unit 1A Lot 901, Block 3 Site Plan — proposed amenity center to include a fitness area, pool, and outdoor Staff provided a brief update on • CCAB update. • Muni -code update. ' • An update on site plans The meeting adiourned at 6:24 P.M. Chairman, Planning and Minutes Planning and Zoning Commission October 12, 2016 Page 2 of 2 MEETING fission Recording Secretary, City of Schertz TO: Planning and Zoning Commission CASE: ZC2016 -014 - 611 & 615 Main Street - Zoning SUBJECT: Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on a request to rezone 611 & 615 Main Street, approximately 1 acre of land, from Single - Family Residential District (R -2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU). GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner/ Applicant: Guadalupe DelToro APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: December 13, 2016 (Original Application) PUBLIC NOTICE: Twenty (20) public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners within two hundred (200) feet of the subject property on December 30, 2016 with a public hearing notice to be published in "San Antonio Express" and the "Herald" prior to the City Council public hearing. At the time of this staff report zero (0) response in favor or opposed have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 1 acre of land from Single - Family Residential District -2 (R -2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU). The property is located at 815 Main Street. The site has an office building that is currently unoccupied. [W-11Z I 111W11 -11Z I llrkel ► Zoning Land Use Single- Family Residential District - 2 (R -2) Vacant d Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU) Commercial Adjacent Properties: Zoning North Single- Family Residential District - 2 (R- South Right -of -way East Single- Family Residential District - 2 (R- West Sinale - Family Residential District - 2 (R- Single Fami Main Street Single Fami Single Fami lF.06 10 GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is generally located 290 feet northeast of the intersection of Main Street and Randolph Ave. The site is currently designed to be used as an office building, but is unoccupied. PROPOSED ZONING: The request is to rezone approximately 1 acre of land from Single - Family Residential District(R -2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU) in order to allow a commercial use. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Sector Plan amendment to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLOP) designates the subject property as part of Historic Downtown Schertz. The objectives for Historic Downtown Schertz are to leverage Schertz's history and heritage to create a unique destination with local independent businesses, encouraging the use of existing buildings. The Main Street Mixed -Use District (MSMU) was created to help achieve these objectives. The Main Street Mixed -Use District (MSMU) is intended to provide a base zoning district to the area along Main Street. In light of the history of the area and variety of land uses that exist, this zoning district allows for both single - family residential uses and low intensity commercial uses. Reduced setbacks and parking requirements are provided as part of this district due to physical constraints. • Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives: The proposed rezoning request is generally in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, the proposed zone change will provide for either single family or low intensity commercial occupancy. • Impact of Infrastructure: The proposed rezoning request should have a minimal impact on the existing water and wastewater systems. • Impact of Public Facilities /Services: The proposed rezoning request will have a no impact on public services, such as schools, fire, police, parks and sanitation services. • Compatibility with Existing and Potential Adjacent Land Uses: The subject property is currently surrounded by single family land uses. The Main Street Mixed -Use District (MSMU) will allow for either low intensity commercial or single - family residential. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies this area as Historic Downtown Schertz which is intended to leverage Schertz's history and heritage to create a unique destination with local independent businesses, encouraging the use of existing buildings. The rezoning request appears to have a minimal impact on the public infrastructure, facilities or services and is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and compatible with the surrounding land uses. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property for the current single - Family Residential District -2 (R -2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), to allow for low intensity commercial land uses that are permitted in the Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU). Based on the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and surrounding land uses the Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU) is the most appropriate zoning district for this tract of land. Staff recommends approval of the rezoning application as submitted. iN Planning Department Recommendation X Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial * While the Commission can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is making a recommendation to City Council on the propose zoning application. In considering action on a zoning application, the Commission should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.5.4 D. Attachments: Public Hearing Notice Map Exhibit Property Survey ",--A 13, '11 PA� kk I.-.i m eon r,9, C js eo 2� o � 0 `>92 .rte` Y5 3 � t'� }# FM 1$ wl" NO _ Ill, m�( 611/615 Main Steet z" ftk i N EN N z z PAfknnhNt" f N W- 4���E a • 4 s h pn i nh I hh 1 Z dV e } ,' Z dV Z eN N Z " dJ N Z EN N N 4M Z dV N N Z Ez EN e N g Z eN N N N Z d eN e N Z eN N Z N Z d(eN N N Z d dJ e N Z dJ N Z eTEW g e N eN N N } Z WeN e N 4 Z d eN M a (a AW Z qDetq e N Z d(eN m a GB,,\Z eN N M. N N a Z eN N a N 611/615 Main Steet z" ftk i N EN N z z PAfknnhNt" f N W- 4���E a • 4 s h pn i nh I hh b Lp lap a �i y "? Yi. &3 0 an 's a 5 b . bA bA a .3 Z. t c `$ ' IT em \ F r� 3 k, Wv, r z gs� s TO: Planning and Zoning Commission 3'f��� .'fTTiTsTiil�ihlNU TTi=I CASE: ZC2016 -008 CCMA South Schertz Plant - Zoning GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner /Applicant: Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority, Clint Ellis APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: June 29, 2016 (Original Application) PUBLIC NOTICE: Six (6) public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners on December 30, 2016 with a public hearing notice to be published in "San Antonio Express" and the "Herald" prior to the City Council public hearing. At the time of this staff report no responses have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to zone approximately 63 acres of land located at 7424 Trainer Hale Road, about 600 feet north of Interstate 10 to Public Use District (PUB). The subject property is currently located in the Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) of the City of Schertz and is owned by Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority who has petitioned for voluntary annexation of the property in order to develop a municipal wastewater treatment plant at this location. On December 13, 2016, City Council adopted Resolution 16 -R -92 accepting Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority's petition for voluntary annexation. LAND USES AND ZONING: Subject Property: Existing None Proposed Public Use District (PUB Adjacent Properties: Land Use Vacant / Agriculture Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Zoning Land Use North Public Use District (PUB) Vacant / Agriculture South Pre- Development (PRE) Vacant / Agriculture East Cibolo Creek — Citv of Cibolo Agriculture Zoning ( Land Use West Predevelooment District (PRE) I Rehabilitation Center PLATTING STATUS: The subject property is currently unplatted. CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan designates the subject property as Agricultural Residential which is defined in the Comprehensive Land Plan as intended to preserve the rural /agriculture state to include large lot residential and some related commercial uses permitted such as: landscaping business, metal workshop, farmers market, convenience store, etc. • Comprehensive Plan Goals and Objectives: The proposed rezoning request is generally in conformance with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. In particular, the proposed zone change supports the goal to ensure adequate development of public facilities as well as upgrade public facilities and services in order to meet the challenges of growth. • Impact of Infrastructure: The proposed zone change will have a large impact on the wastewater infrastructure system by providing additional capacity for community growth. • Impact of Public Facilities /Services: The proposed rezoning request should have minimal impact on public services, such as schools, fire, police, parks and sanitation services. • Compatibility with Existing and Potential Adjacent Land Uses: The subject property is currently surrounded by predominantly undeveloped land and agriculture uses which is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The Comprehensive Land Use Plan identifies this area as Agricultural Residential to provide for large acre lots and includes ancillary uses to the neighborhood. This zone change recommendation will be presented in conjunction with a voluntary annexation request. Staff recommends approval. Planning Department Recommendation X Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial * While the Commission can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is making a recommendation to City Council on the propose zoning application. In considering action on a zoning application, the Commission should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.5.4 D. Attachments: 200 -Foot Notice Map Zoning Exhibit iN ,11�1 o- o-10 7720 TRAINER HALE RD (339335) 7424 TRAINER HALE RD (339355) BOLTON RD (63569) SCHHERTZ COMMUNITY* SERVICE - OPPORTUNITY Tl!� @T TT T T T Bexar County N m ALI hg yi Classification MW fd M M, W'd EMU d M m VNE "m IM d M wo \w W M f d M \A4 WZ ,Pff d M yf m I W d M mv a m m SWEV d M mv 9 m m fine m \ff zm ORD 16-S-xx M m CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY CB 5193 P-20 ABS 5 IV 1)