The URL can be used to link to this page

11-28-2017 Agenda with backupMEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL November 28, 2017 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 "HOLIDAY TREE LIGHTING CEREMONY" TO OCCUR BEFORE THE COUNCIL MEETING 6:00 P.M. Call to Order — Regular Session Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flans of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Davis) City Events and Announcements • Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof: Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to 11 -28- 2017 - Council Agenda an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Workshop • Update on the Roadway Rehabilitation. Project. (B. James /K. Woodlee /J. Nowak) Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self - explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember. 1. Minutes - Approval of the minutes of the Regular Meeting of November 14, 2017 . and minutes of the Special Meeting of November 20, 2017. (J. Kessel /B. Dennis) 2. Boards, Commissions and Committee Member Appointments - Consideration and /or action approving the appointment of Ms. Kimberly Smith as an Alternate Member to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and the appointment of Glen Outlaw to the Committee of Committees Advisory Board. (Mayor /Council /B. Dennis) 3. Scheduling a Regular Council meeting for December 19, 2017 and the Cancellation of the December 26, 2017 and January 2, 2018 City Council Meetings - Consideration and/or action scheduling a Regular Council meeting for December 1.9, 2017 and cancelling the December 26, 2017 and January 2, 2018 City Council meetings due to the holidays. (B. Dennis /Council) 4. Ordinance No 17 -M -48 - Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance authorizing a Reimbursement Agreement with CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for construction of a water line extension associated with the development of the Schertz Retail Center. Final Reading (D. Wait /J. Hooks) 5. Ordinance No. 17 -T -46 - Consideration and /or action approving an Ordinance authorizing a budget amendment to fund elevated storage tank repainting. Final Reading (B. James /J. Walters) 6. Ordinance No. 17 -K -47 - Consideration and /or action on an ordinance closing and abandoning to the abutting property owner a section of Trainer Hale Road right -of. -way located approximately 850 feet south of the intersection of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Road. Final Reading (B. James /L. Wood/B. Cox) Discussion Items 7. Resolution No. 17 -R -104 - Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing an Improvement Agreement with Rolling Hills Ranch Development Ltd., for the construction of roadway and infrastructure improvements to Eckhardt Road related to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1. (B. James /L. Wood/B. Cox) 8. Resolution No. 17 -R -105 - Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizing a Parkland Improvement Agreement with Rolling Hills Ranch Development 11 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 2 - Ltd., related to public parkland dedication and improvements for The Parklands Subdivision Units 1 and 2. (B. James /L. Wood/B. Cox) 9. Public Hearing — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and /or action approving PH Resolution No. 17 -R -107 adopting the land use assumptions and Capital Improvements Plan and possible imposition of roadway impact fees. (B. James /K. Woodlee) 10. Resolution No. 1.7 -R -108 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution supporting the filing by the Texas Department of Transportation of an application with the Alamo Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program funded through the Surface Transportation Program — Metro Mobility; pledging that if an award is received the City of Schertz is committed to providing funding, authorizing the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Schertz in all matters related to the application. (B. James /K. Woodlee) 11. Resolution No. 17 -R -109 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing an agreement for a Temporary Construction License across property owned by Schertz - Cibolo- Universal City Independent School District. (B. James /K. Woodlee) Roll Call Vote Confirmation Closed Session 12. City Council will meet in closed session under section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code, Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations; Closed Meeting. The governmental body is not required to conduct an open meeting (1) to discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the governmental body and with which the governmental body is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect. Project E -036 Reconvene into Regular Session 12a. Take any action based on discussions held in closed session under Agenda Item 12. Roll Call Vote Confirmation Requests and Announcements 13. Announcements by City Manager. 14. Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items be placed on a future City Council agenda. 15. Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) 11 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 3 - • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees • Recognition of actions by community volunteers 16. Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR • Updated information regarding the old school house. (Information requested by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards) Adjournment CERTIFICATION I, BRENDA DENNIS, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 22nd DAY OF NOVEMBER 2017 AT 2:00 P.M. WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. greKAot peww'Ls Brenda Dennis, City Secretar I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON DAY OF , 2017. Title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 210 -619 -1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. 11 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 4 - COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Carpenter Councilmember Davis— Place I Audit Committee Schertz Housing Authority Board Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Interview Committee for Boards and Investment Advisory Committee Commissions Main Street Committee Main Street Committee - Chair TIRZ II Board Councilmember Gutierrez — Place 2 Councilmember Larson — Place 3 Main Street Committee — Vice Chair Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards — Place 4 Councilmember Sca2liola — Place 5 Audit Committee Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation Main Street Committee Councilmember Kiser — Place 6 Councilmember Crawford — Place 7 Schertz Animal Services Advisory Commission Schertz- Seguin Local Government Corporation Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions 11 -28 -2017 City Council Agenda Page - 5 - CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Subject: City Secretary Minutes Agenda No. 1 The City Council held a Regular Meeting on November 1.4, 2017 and a special meeting on November 20, 2017. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting on November 14, 2017 and the minutes of the special meeting of November 20, 2017. ATTACHMENTS Regular Meeting of November 14, 2017 minutes Special Meeting of November 20, 2017 minutes MINUTES REGULAR MEETING November 14, 2017 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on November 14, 2017, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James City Attorney Dan Santee City Secretary Brenda Dennis Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to Texas. (Councilmember Councilmember K flags of the United • Proclamation fe odnizi ve) Mayor Carpenter read each and Michelle Hernandez (P Pate (America Recycles Da New p.m. followed by the pledges of allegiance to the of Texas. Cancer Day. (Mayor Carpenter /Susan. Martinez) Recycles Day. (Mayor Carpenter /Pratt Industries .tion and presented them to the recipients, Susan Martinez Cancer Day) and Pratt Industries General Manager Marty Fire Department Aaron Escobedo, Craig Jacobs – Fire Fighter (D. Wait /K. Long) Public Works — Bobby Hervey – Water /Wastewater Tech, Alejandro Lazarre – Drainage Worker I (D. Wait /J. Hooks /D. Letbetter) 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - I - Mayor Carpenter recognized each department supervisor who presented a brief bio of each new employee. Everyone was given an opportunity to speak afterwards. Mayor and Council welcomed all the new staff members on board. Presentation • Guadalupe Regional Medical Center — Prescription Assistance report. (D. Wait /J. Riggs) Mayor Carpenter recognized Dr. Jerry Riggs from Seguin's Guadalupe Regional Medical Center in Seguin, TX who provided Council a briefing on this past year's prescription assistance that was provided for the Schertz area citizens who ,qualified for the program. Mayor Carpenter spoke expressing his gratitude for the,,pfogram, and what it does to assist our residents. He thanked Dr. Riggs and his support team for the ceptional work. • Update regarding the recent Trunk -or -Treat Mayor Carpenter recognized Fire Chief Iad, on the recent successful city Trunk -or -Treat various games for the children. nt. (D. Wait /K. Long /J. P rry /M. Spence) buncil providing a brief history of the event, it's he gradual involvement of more city departments rganizations. Around 2007, the event was moved first time the event was moved to the weekend people. This year, approximately 5,000 people Events Manager Mari Spence came forward explaining that they had utilized social media to advertise this event: The Public Affairs Department also created a survey and the citizen feedback,litovided the following: - The event reeived a 3.68 out of 5 rating. - 90% were children under the age of 11 - 82% attended from the surrounding area - Trunks were the favorite aspect of the event Food trucks were added this year and they did a great business with the attendees. Rachel, Family Coordinator from the Schertz YMCA, spoke next saying they used to do this event on their own with city department (i.e., Fire) participation. Last year they partnered with the City to make it bigger and better than it was before. They handle the games and activities and partner with the schools to get volunteers to assist. 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - • Fire Chief Kade Long stated afterwards they reflected on the event and what they could do better for next year. There have been ideas submitted from the survey, other staff members, and participants. Next year will reflect some expansion of additional activities, moving the hayride, adding more trunks and creating more entrances to avoid lengthy lines, etc. The ultimate goal is to provide a safe place for parents to bring their kids to have a good time. Mayor and Councilmembers expressed their appreciation for this successful city event. Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James /D. Wait /S. Gonzalez) Mayor Carpenter recognized Executive Director Brian Jams who provided the following announcements: Wednesday, November 151h Monday, N City Council will hold a special me New Braunfels. �sentation. The purpose of and gather input from the .ncil Chambers to go on a are welcome also. canvass and swear in re- elected and and Friday, November 23rd _ 24th es Closed in Observance of the T] Tuesday, November 281h win Friday, December 1St City Council Team Building Retreat 8:30 am, Fairfield Inn & Suites Festival of Angels Event 6:00 pm, front of the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex This event includes a lighted night parade, Blue Santa fundraiser, pictures with Santa, sounds of the season from local music groups, food and craft sales. 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 3 - Tuesday, December 5, 11:00 am to 1:00 pm San Antonio Manufacturing Association is holding a luncheon. The Mayor will be speaking at that event alongside San Antonio Mayor Ron Nirenberg and County Judge Nelson Wolff. They will be rolling out the Manufacturing Report at that event. If any councilmember wishes to attend, contact the EDC Department to reserve a seat. • Announcements and recognitions by City Manager (J. Kessel) Mayor Carpenter recognized City Manager John Kessel who spoke about the 2015 . Bond Election that included FM 1518 which included city matched money ° to help create a seed program to start the FM 151.8 project. TxDOT matched this and we got some additional funds from the MPO. The amount $19.5 million was going to take care of design from FM 78 to IH 10 and whatever operational improvements could be done with the remaining funds after right -of -way design and acquisition have been taken care t0 A concern now of the city, citizens and public: safety personnel is how to inove'the future Phase II part of the program further forward. He has been, in contact with 'TxDOT who told us last week if we could support that project they world take lead `in going to the MPO in December to request the additional phases: This would mean a small amount of match money on our part, probal'iy about the same' a we did last time which was $5 million - - -it could however be as rnueh, ,$10 million. While the numbers are still being finalized he hopes to come forward to Council on November 28 With an action item. He requested Council begin thinking about this as *would save the city a lot of money; mobilize one time and gee that project through. We would have to decide if we would do CO's or GO's.-While TxDOT does not need to know this, they do want an answer if this is a project we would. support---so Look for that action item in two weeks. very ents M ;ha any" questions, they can contact Mr. Kessel for of being able to finish out FM 1518 in a single project Mayor Carpentet recognized the following individuals who spoke: • Ms. Clare Laytpu, 1223 Lost Meadows Drive, who spoke on the low voter turnout in the recent election, the increasing traffic congestion /problems on FM 151.8, and an upcoming TxDOT meeting on November 29 at the Schertz Civic Center regarding the proposed FM 1518 improvements. She predicts the southern Schertz residents continuing traffic struggles could increase voter turnout at the next election, which would please her. • Mr. Richard Eads, 5523 Cypress Point, who thanked the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, (Chuck Van Zandt) for assisting him with some issues regarding his area. He also spoke about the crime situation in Cypress Point and stated that the residents do not feel their property or families are safe. Several families have already moved 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 4 - because of the crime rate. He has already spoken to Chief Hansen about it. He wants Council to pay attention to the expansion of Schertz and staffing of the Police Department to make sure you are ahead of the game. Workshop • FY 201.6 -1.7 Schertz Economic Development Corporation Annual Report. (T. Brown /K. Kinateder) Mayor Carpenter recognized EDC President Tim Brown who provided a PowerPoint presentation containing an overview of SEDC and information on active agreements, business retention, recruitment, a data snapshot, development update, and financial summary. Highlights of the annual report are that all greement are in compliance. The SEDC BRE plan is running on all cylinders. Recruitment activities are data driven and Schertz is driving the industrial market. Additionally', vie are continuing to add to reserves for targeted projects. Mayor Carpenter stated the EDC had existed' lung before he arrived and in looking at some past city documents and looking at the city bb mess development as it exists today, it has largely turned out the way, it'was envisioned back�in 1972. . He said EDC has done a fantastic job. The residents who are members of the board. do this for the benefit of the whole community. He thanked the board, members and staf, or'All their work and the wins they have brought us in the last decade and what is, in progre s right now. Since this is not a budgeted item, staff is looking for direction as to what Council wishes staff to do. Suggestions and comments from Council included 1) opening this up to local businesses to sponsor the cost, 2) combining it with our regular `Clean Up Days,' 3) doesn't really see a need for it, 4) staff time would involve at least 3 to 5 people, 5) doesn't see a problem for the city to find the money. 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 5 - Councilmember Crawford stated if the cities of Live Oak and Cibolo can do this so can we. Why can't we do it and do it as well or better? Mr. Kessel said staff can put together an informational item and proposal and provide that to Council. • Workshop discussion reviewing the Library and Police fees. (B. James /J. Walters) Mayor Carpenter recognized Finance Director James Walters who provided a PowerPoint presentation which included some background information including how fees are set and whether they cover a cost, produce a profit, or break even. Police Fees: Some are user charges, such as SolicitQf/'eddler Permits, Background Check/Clearance Letter, or Alarm Permits. Some are deterrents to prevent certain actions such as False Alarm Fees. There are also fees regulated by the 'state, such as accident reports, finger prints, and body cam videos. Accident Report fees ($6 each) resulted in revj�pue of $' revenue ($1.0 per request) was $3,980. Body Gam Vic $1.00 per minute of footage. Since we have not yet dad we have no other available data on it. Background Ch resulted in revenue of $2,240 for,FY 2016 -17. Solicitno plus a $10 fee for a background check. "Last FY 2016 -1 Alarm permits for residences can be no n residential is currently, set at $10 annual] and commercial permits.,Currently, resid 2 Commercial is. S50. annually. Revenue time the po alarms after received by the'fes than burglar alarm This type of alarm and requires height $100 to $500. The 5 calls. T 04 for FY 201 -17. Fingerprints fee amounts are =$10 each plus y requests for this type of record —'learance Letter fees ($10 each) ,ddler Permit Fees are $40 each [ie revenue gained was $1,150. than 50. The City of Schertz fee amount for "he city currently has 3,231 active residential it is $10, Tier 1 Commercial is $25, and Tier this last fiscal year was $40,830. During this eyenue generated is used up after 355 false �s range from 50 to $100, depending on the number of alarms ,vithin a 12 -month period. A fee also exists for false alarms other e is a grace period of 3 false alarms within a 12- month period. be a robbery in progress or panic alarm that is manually activated •esponse. These fees (after the 3rd alarm grace period) range from las not charged any citizen this fee in the past 3 years. Many of the fees in the Police Department are dictated or in some way regulated by the State Government. The fees with the largest revenue impact are the Alarm Permit Fees. The Police Department will be reviewing these fees along with their other charges and their associated procedures to further improve the overall processes for staff, residents and local business owners. Mayor Carpenter recognized Library Director Melissa Uhlhorn who provided a summary of information regarding fees charged by the Library. 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 6 - Library Fees: There are three categories of fees. Cost Recovery fees are for replacement of library cards, lost material charges, and inter- library loan postage. Deterrent fees include overdue fines and meeting room rental fees. Revenue generators are copying, printing, and faxing fees. The Library is authorized to charge fees as dictated by City Ordinance 90 -M -03, which establishes guidelines and penalties for library borrowing. The City Fee Schedule is updated with changes through annual approval processes. The State of Texas (Texas Administrative Code) also public libraries can charge and to whom. For example, with the Cities of Cibolo and Selma, and Guadalup Library must provide services to those residents as if"tl code also tells them what services the library can circulation, research). Library Fees are reviewed annually for any, updates libraries are doing as well as some private businesse copying services.) The goal is to be in line with the otl market price of local businesses. Fees are usually circumstances. Fees have remained stable over several library fees is a small percentage of overall City revenu generated just a little under $50,000 annually..The reve damaged items fees, printing services and iniseelIane'ou! es different types of fees has interlocal agreements y; therefore, the Schertz residents of Schertz. The mot charge for (typical Staff looks at what other local who offer similar services (i.e., r libraries and slightly below the Maly changed due to changing ears and revenue generated from Over the past 6 years, they have ae comes from overdue, lost and Ms. Uhlhorn provided mote backgroundllaistorical information about non - resident user fees and the associated complications. Seventy -nine percent of the library users come from Schertz, Cibolo, Selma, and Guadalupe County. These entities are also the ones who provide funding for the library operations through interlocal agreements. Some of the fines the Library, charges are overdue fines (maximum $1). Procedures are in place to assist users: by reminding them of the due date (e- mail), 3 -day grace period, maximum limit, etc. �chertz, as well as libraries across the country, are streamlining their overduellfine structure to improve the user experience and encourage people to continue to use the library and return overdue items. This same view is being applied to lost or damaged items to encourage people to take responsibility for the materials they borrow. Meeting Room fees are assessed to limit the use of the rooms to local residents and to recover some operating costs associated with after hours use or with cleaning beyond the norm. The fees also discourage constant use of the rooms by groups and businesses from outside our immediate location, allowing the rooms to be available for our community. Last fiscal year the rooms were used 825 times, for HOA meetings, Girl Scouts, study groups, classes, community meetings, etc. Ms. Uhlhorn addressed comments and questions from Council. 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 7 - • Workshop discussion regarding the status of the Capital Improvement Projects. (B. James /K. Woodlee) Mayor Carpenter recognized City Engineer Kathy Woodlee who provided an update on the capital improvement projects that are either already funded or to be funded by a variety of sources. The projects are as follows: Northcliffe water Line Replacement — complete -- replacement of 4,200 linear feet of 8" water line and 2,000 linear feet of 12" water line. Construction began in April 2017, construction was completed in October 2017, and the final construction cost turned out to be $733,823.50. The Warranty Period expires in October 2018. Schertz Parkway Maske to Live Oak ) - - Constr concrete pour on October 20th. The Southbound November. The estimated project completion is construction cost is $1.1 million. Concrete requi which is a standard engineering specification, Thf original curb construction and then the traffic Departments have done a great job assisting witht on began October 5th with the first e completioh is scheduled for mid - dduled for March 2018. The current a 28 day wait period for cure time, id encounter a few issues such as the tals. °Our Public Works and Police ic',,"durine these problems. Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Line and Lift Nation -- The project is currently in the design and acquisition phase and the final alignment has been set. Final Design is anticipated for early 2018. Construc 6n is anticipated "in:"the Spring of 2018 with an estimated completion during the Spring, Of, 2019. The current construction cost is estimated at $5 million. Elevated Storage Tank Painting — This is another project managed by Schertz Public Works. This is for the Nacogdoches 0.5 MMG Elevated Tank at 1.9025 FM 3009 in Garden Ridge. The cost is estimated at $392,000 with a four -month field schedule. The second storage tank is at East Live Oak and is a 1.5 MMG ground storage tank located at 1049 East Live Oak. The estimated cost is $295,000. We are scheduled to begin after completion of the Nacogdoches tank painting. 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 8 - Fire -EMS Oil -Water Separator — This is an actual city facility we are working on. There is an existing oil -water separator located between Fire Station 1 and EMS which is failing. Repeated heavy loading has caused the lid to permanently fail. They engaged an engineering firm to design a solution. Options were to remove it, replace it, or rehab it with a sturdier cover. However, it was discovered this would not be feasible. They are back to the drawing board seeking other innovative solutions, possibly relocating the wash station to a higher location. Right now, it is a work in progress. Miscellaneous Drainage Studies — 1) Fairhaven subdivision subdivision on Greenridge. There have been complaints of damaging their roads. Staff is going to look at it to try , Another one is in southern Schertz, between Hunter Estates' at Schertz subdivisions, drainage from Lazar Parkway rigl existing drainage channel and creates a maintenance problei homes, it affects the residential area. FM 1103 Utility Relocation — This is also a project manag Department. Ford Engineering is working o the desig TxDOT to establish appropriate utility adjustments. Roadway Rehabilitation (aka PCI Project)— There,is,,so they are working with Public Works to refine the scope,,, The basis is the output from that study as to which roads /, of work is needed, and determine the refined east estimate a presentation to Council on November, 28 or December 5. page into the Scenic Hills much water coming down mitigate that situation. 2) Estates, and The Reserve vay —it stays within the ► hile it does not affect the by the Schertz,,Public Works )base and coordinating with ie bond funding identified and f the first package of projects. tments to work on, what level They anticipate bringing forth FM 1518 Improvements (TxDOT Project) - TxDOT is working on the design of the entire length of FM 1518 from M 78 to IH 10. The original scope includes construction of Phase I ($19.5 million). It did include operational improvements and turn lanes, but they were just strategic pieces of:the overall project, not interim solutions. TxDOT is working to secure additional funding ,for'therc, cinder of the project. A public open house is were no • Workshop discussion 2017. or comm ents from Council. s Policy Development Process. (J. Kessel /D. Wait) Mayor Carpenter recognized Executive Director Dudley Wait who stated in the past policies have aried., There has not been a solid process. In the past we have not come to Council to say- have we hit the mark. Now, staff has refined the process. Mr. Wait presented a PowerPoint presentation with the following highlights: Step 1 is to identify the owner of that policy; who takes care of it every day? Step 2 is to define the problem; what are we actually trying to solve? Lay out the goals of the policy? Is the problem being address, and lastly, what is success? Step 3 is benchmarking, what do other organizations do, what is the legal precedent, what is the recommended current processes? 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 9 - Step 4 is for a City Council review and ask what are the policy goals, and let's set an approval plan. Step 5 is drafting a policy, create it from scratch and /or model it from others. Step 6 is vetting, review with the City Attorney followed by Organization Review, both broadly and deep. Step 7 is approval by City Council and the City Manager Step 8 is Education and Communication training sessions, , distributing the plan and arranging access to the policy. Step 9 is to regularly review the policy to see if it still mets -'the needs. Did we meet the original goals? Timely update the policy. • Workshop discussion on Council Review of Kurz /S. Gonzalez/B. James) Mayor Carpenter recognized Executive Director Dud this item. Director of Human Resources and Purchaii to the City Manager Sarah Gonzalez, Executive D Director Brian James also spoke and addressed questi City Council policies." Kessel/D. Wait /J. t who introduced the plan for assets Jessica Kurz, Assistant Dudley Wait and Executive comments from Council. rraT ruization policy. • Key Decision, Points: Staff intends to (1) develop a Fraternization Policy and (2) limit it i scope to supervisor and subordinate relationships. • Approval Plan: The fraternization policy addresses work place behavior that, if a supervisor violates, will result in adverse disciplinary action up to and including termination. Staff recommends that when complete, this policy is approved by City Council. Prohibition on Harassment and Sexual Harassment -- (presented by HR Director Jessica Kurz • Policy Goal: The Prohibition of Harassment and Prohibition of Sexual Harassment policies will separate our current single policy into two policies and 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 10 - then will clearly outline the expectations of employees and supervisors regarding how violations should be reported. • Benchmarking: Staff believe the City should have two separate policies that clearly spell out Sexual Harassment from other types of Harassment so that it is crystal clear the City prohibits sexual harassment of any kind. A review of our benchmark cities show that New Braunfels, San Marcos and Live Oak have two separate policies. Georgetown addresses it as two separate topics within their overall "Professional Work Environment" policy. • Key Decision Points: Staff intends to (1) separate these two policies and (2) to add to these two policies a clearly defined reporting requirements policy. • Approval Plan: Since these policies address specific discipline steps that are unique in the reporting requirements, Staff recommends these policies be approved by City Council. City Manager • Policy Goal:„ =The proposed Social Media Policy defines the processes and procedures for X11 departments and employees using social media on behalf of the City of Schertz to disseminate public information and /or promote events, programs and ci,services. It also serves to establish a centralized approach for overseeing and managing all the social media platforms that the City has. While this policy does include a brief section regarding personal social media use, it does not govern private social media accounts by elected and appointed officials. • Benchmarking: When drafting the social media policy, staff reviewed not only policies from our benchmark cities, but also those from other cities that we feel have best practices in the area of social media. We received policies from 11 out of the 13 cities from which we requested information (received 3 out of 5 policies from our benchmark cities and 8 policies from best practice cities). While staff found that a consistent goal for these policies was to define processes and 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 11 - procedures for all departments and employees using social media on behalf of a city, 8 out of the 11 cities included a section (some longer and more complex than others) regarding personal social media use for city employees. With this research, Staff felt it necessary to include a brief section regarding personal social media use in the City of Schertz policy. • Approval Plan: This particular social media policy is an operational policy that guides the departments and employees who manage the day to day postings of the City's social media activities. For this reason, staff is not recommending this policy be approved by City Council. Ms. Gonzalez and Mr. Wait addressed questions and comments from Council. IT Director Myles Clauser assisted by providing additional comments. Consent Agenda Items The following NO. 17 -A -44 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ CONFIRMING AND APPROVING A BOUNDARY AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE MUNICIPAL BOUNDARY BETWEEN THE CITY OF SCHERT.. AND THE CITY OF CIBOLO; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 3. City of Schertz 2018 Master Calendar — Consideration and /or action regarding the approval of the City of Schertz 2018 Master Calendar. (J. Kessel /S. Gonzalez) S. Resolution No. 17 -R -97 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution . authorizing the City Manager to sign an Interlocal Agreement for Fire Protection Services in Guadalupe County between the City of Schertz, City of Cibolo and City of Seguin. (D. Wait /K. Long) The following was read into record: 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page -12 - RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -97 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AN INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR FIRE PROTECTION SERVICES IN GUADALUPE COUNTY BETWEEN THE CITY OF CIBOLO, CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND THE CITY OF SEGUIN, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH 10. Resolution No. 17 -R -100 - Consideration and/or action, approving a Resolution authorizing Amendment No. 2 and assignment of the development agreement between the City of Schertz, City of Schertz Economic Development Corp oration, and GE Oil & Gas LLC. (J. Kessel/K. Kinateder) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION'NO 7 -R -1 A RESOLUTION ON NO. 17 -R -102 1Y THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, (G THE APPRAISED VALUE OFFER OF THE TEXAS TRANSPORTATION (TXDOT) TO ACQUIRE TWO MINOR ) NEEDED FOR THE FM 1003 EXPANSION PROJECT, AND IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who moved seconded by Councilmember Davis to approve the consent agenda items 1, 2, 3, 5, 10 & 12. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page -13 - Discussion Items 4. Resolution No. 17-R-96 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution authorizing the City Manager to enter into an agreement for the purchase of thirteen (13) video recording systems. (D. Wait/M. Hansen/M. Bane) The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17-R-96 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGI AGREEMENT FOR THE PURCHASE OF RECORDING SYSTEMS. Mayor Carpenter recognized Police Lt. Thad 1$iwecki w the 2017/ 2018 budget year, the police department was; in-car / body worn video recording systems. rova purchase of thirteen (13) Watch Guard in-car /body w purchase of these video recording, systems will be c under BuyBoard agreement #524`11. ', The purchase of funded through the city's General, Fund—The fiscal $81,510.00. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Carpen Councilmembei with Mayor Thompson, Ki,4 CITY OF SCHERTZ,, I ENTER INTO AN TEEN (13) VIDEO introduced this ,item stating for roved to purchase',thirteen (13) fthis resolution will allow the . video recording systems. The Meted through Watch Guard, ese recording systems will be 4ptt t of this project will be The following was record: RESOLUTION NO. 17-R-98 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACCEPT A TEXAS FOREST SERVICE TEXAS INTRASTATE FIRE MUTUAL AID SYSTEM (TIFMAS) GRANT FOR A TYPE 3 FIRE APPARATUS AND AUTHORIZING CITY STAFF TO COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE GRANT. 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page -14 - WA Mayor Carpenter recognized Fire Chief Kade Long who introduced this item stating The Schertz Fire Rescue Department participates as a member of the Texas Intrastate Fire Mutual Aid System (TIFMAS) in which the department responds to large -scale state disasters. The TIFMAS program has been allocating firefighting equipment to alleviate the wear and tear on equipment of local municipalities during these deployments. The equipment allocated is available at no charge and can be used by the accepting jurisdiction for local events and mutual aid with the understanding that the jurisdiction will use the equipment in response to state requests for mutual aid. This grant provides 1.00% of the cost of a fully equipped type III brush truck, including an installed radio package and an equipment complement. The engine will be titled in the name of the City of Schertz. This award is based on a point system and one component is being awarded points for each deployment that our department participates in each year. Acceptance of the grant does not mandate that we participate in every deployment. We are allowed to send the apparatus with other area fire department members slaffm2 the vehicle if we have an event locally that we are ,preparing for. The value approximately $285,000. is Ordinance No. I7 -M -48 Consideration ` and /or action. approving an Ordinance authorizing a Reimbt`ement Agrinent with CVS Pharmacy, Inc. for construction of a wale�line� tnision associated with the development of the Schert z Retail Center. I''lYSt Reading (D. W�it/J: Hooks} LIVER ORDINANCE NO. 17 -M -48 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CVS PHARMACY,' INC., FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER LINE EXTENSION ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE IIEREOF Mayor Carpenter recognized Assistant Public Works Director Jimmy Hooks who introduced this item stating CVS Pharmacy, Inc., (CVS) is proposing to develop the Schert z Retail Center Subdivision at the southwest corner of the intersection. of FM 1103 1.1 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page -15 - and Old Wiederstein Road. Water and wastewater main extensions are required to meet the UDC requirements. The water main extension is required to run from FM 1.1.03, along Old Wiederstein Road, to the end of the frontage of the subdivision. During the planning stage of the subdivision, it was identified that in order to provide a better public system — both for this proposed subdivision and the City's system overall — the water line should be extended further along Old Wiederstein Road, to Fairfax Road, and along Fairfax :Road to connect to an existing line in Sunridge Road. That will provide a looped connection for the extension and alleviate a dead -end main condition. Dead -end water mains are undesirable because they create a potential occurrence of stagnant water and require regular maintenance to flush the line. 8. Restitution No. 17 -4:99 = Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution authorizin the City of Schertz to purchase Office 365 licenses, MS Project licenses, Adobe Software, Windows user licenses, Windows Server licenses, StormWinds training licenses, SCCM software & hardware and any miscellaneous software, hardware and licenses from SHI Government, a State of Texas DIR vendor not to exceed $147,260.00. (B. James /M. Clauser) The following was read into record: 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page -16 - 9. RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -99 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO PURCHASE OFFICE 365 LICENSES, MS PROJECT LICENSES, ADOBE SOFTWARE, WINDOWS USERS LICENSES, WINDOWS SERVER LICENSES, STORMWINDS TRAINING LICENSES, SCCM SOFTWARE & HARDWARE AND MISC SOFTWARE, HARDWARE AND LICENSES FROM SHI GOVERNMENT, A STATE DIR VENDOR NOT TO EXCEED $147,260.00 DURING FISCAL YEAR 201:7 - 2018, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized IT Director Myles Clausen who introduced this item stating their approval authorizes the City to procure hardware, software Office 365 licenses, and miscellaneous IT related items through a State WR Vendor, SHI Government from approved budgeted funds for the Fiscal year of Oct 2017 thru Sept 2018 -in the amount not to exceed $147,260.00. The City is requesting the purchase of additional Office 365 licenses as well as the approved line items in the I.T. Dept. budget as outlined in the Fiscal Impact section. The following was read into record: RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -103 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING PURCHASES UP TO $85,000 WITH ANY ONE VENDOR, INCLUDING SOUTHERN COMPUTER WAREHOUSE, INTECH SOUTHWEST AND CDW AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH Mayor Carpenter recognized IT Director Myles Clauser who introduced this item stating the City's practice is to seek authorization from Council when expenditures 1.1 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page -17 - with a vendor may possibly exceed $50,000 in one fiscal year. Staff is requesting approval to spend up to $85,000 with any one of these vendors, Southern Computer Warehouse, Intech Southwest and CDW as part of the City's software and hardware program for the FY 2017 -1.8 as budgeted in the IT Dept. approved line items. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Gutierrez who moved seconded by Councilmember Davis to approve :Resolution No. 1.7 -R -103. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis,, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards stepped away from the dais. 11. Resolution No. 17 -R -101 — Consideration a action approving a Resolution authorizing the acquisition of permanent and temporary easements On Schaefer Road necessary for the completion of pipelines aid appurtenances designed to tarry water in conjunction with the Corbett elevated storage tarrkproject: (,B. James /K. Woodlee) The following was read into record: RESOLUTl COMPLETION OF PIPELINE. CARRY WATER IN CONJUN STORAGE TANK PROJECT . 17 -R -1 COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, ACQUISITIC?N OF PERMANENT AND CHAEFER ROAD NECESSARY FOR THE kND APPURTENANCES DESIGNED TO [ON WITH THE CORBETT ELEVATED Mayor, Carpenter, recognized City Engineer Kathy Woodlee who introduced this item stating earlier she -talked about the work to be done for the elevated water storage tank project. The easements that we ar& looking at acquiring are along Schaefer Road. Most of the, right -of -way is under Bexar County jurisdiction. In order tc install the new mains in their ultimate location within the future right -of -way of Schaefer Rod it is proposed that the mains be located outside the existing right -of. -way in easements. Tire' ; easements will be established to remain until such time that the area is incorporated into the ultimate right -of. -way of Schaefer Road. Staff is seeking the authority to negotiate and acquire the necessary easements for installation of the water distribution mains along Schaefer Road. Staff recommends approval. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved seconded by Councilmember Kiser to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -101. The vote was unanimous with Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford 1 I -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 18 - voting for and no one voting no. (Mayor Pro -Tent Edwards had stepped away front the dais) Motion passed. 13. Ordinance No. 17 -T -46 — Consideration and/or action approving an Ordinance authorizing a budget amendment to fund elevated storage tank repainting. First Reading (B. James /J. Walters) The following was read into record: ORDINANCE NO. 17 -T -46 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL ::Old' THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FUND ELEVATED STORAGE TANK REPAINTING; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE Mayor Carpenter recognized Finance Director James Walters who introduced this item stating on October 10, 2017 City Council authorized" th ,City to enter into a contract with Tank Pro, Inc. for the painting 0 the Nacogdoches elevated storage tank. Back in the budget process we were originally at that time proposed that this be funded out of bond funds that we would come back to Council 'sometime in 2018-, The bond Ordinance details the amount and allocates the funding. Reviewing the end of year, it looked like the water and sewer fund actually had more money in the t instruction reserves than we had anticipated in putting tho budget together, so we are asking Council to re- authorize the funding for thi ' roject frorolhe construction reserves in water and sewer. In comment, Mayor Carpenter indicated that We are using restricted funds as opposed to others. In answer, NMr; Walters stated we, using construction funds rather than using up Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Crawford who moved seconded by Councilmember Thom son to approve Ordinance No. 17 -T -46 first reading. The vote wag unanimous with Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Ckawvford voting, for and no one voting no. (Mayor Pro- Tem Edwards had stepped away front the dais) Motion passed. 14. Ordinance No. 17 -K -47 - Conduct a public hearing and consider action on an ordinance closing and abandoning to the abutting property owner a section of Trainer Hale Road PH right -of -way located approximately 850 feet south of the intersection of FM 151.8 and Lower Seguin Road. First Reading (B. James /L. Wood /B. Cox) The following was read into record: 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page -19 - Mayor Carpenter recognized Executive Director Brian. James who introduced this item stating what Council has before them is an item abandoning a p,' , ion of unnecessary old right -of -way off Trainer Hale Road. The property adjacent is' owned by Schertz 151.8 — Crossvine and they are looking to acquiring that old unnecessary right -of -way into their development. Staff recommends approval of abandonment. Mayor Carpenter opened the public hearing hearing for Council Comments. in answer to Councilmember Crawford's ques Director Brian James stated the that it is a right one spoke,, closed the public on who owns the property, Executive tay and is owned by the city. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Councilmember Davis to approve Erdirtanee No. 17-X-47 ,first reading. The vote was unanimous with Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no.: (Mayor Pro4em Edwards had stepped away from the dais) Motion passed. the dais. Dennis who provided the roil call vote for Manager. were made. members to request that items be placed on a future agenda. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who expressed his congratulations to David Scagliola who will be sitting in his place at a future meeting. He has two thoughts he would like the city to develop down the road. The first item is to have staff consider the idea of workforce development housing. This is different from age based housing or income based housing. He believes that we are very close to becoming the city where the average worker for the City of Schertz is not going to be able to afford 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 20 - 17. to live in the city. There have been times in his past where in order to live in a community an employer develops some creative financing to allow that to happen. He would like to see this possibly happen because if we can have our city employees for the most part live and work in Schertz we are going to be a better community. The second item he would like the City to consider is in regard to Republic Services. He requests us to see how we can extend and increase the amount of recyclables to reduce the waste in the landfills, pertinent to the proclamation read tonight. He provided an example of an experiment he did where he purchased a large trash can and marked it recycle. He found that approximately 75% of his trash could be put into this large trash can as it would not fit in the small bin provided. He believes that if the City and Republic Services can work together and get some larger recyclable cans out to our ,residents he thinks we will see meeting the goal of achieving a higher and higher ratio of recyclable items. He would like to see how this might be approached down the road. Mayor Carpenter stated that the way Counc requested items is that these would not be on Council to take up these items in the near future. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Crawford w] Councilmember Thompson's comments particular to extet experimented on this and now he cap,: get his trash into a p� legal to go into the recycle bin. He doesn't want the city to Antonio. _ Thompson worded the above r agenda but an appeal for the ienber Thompson concurred. stated that he would support ig recycling efforts as he too =r fag, everything else that is ie residents as they do in San In response, Mayor Carpenter stated that as a matter of procedure, any Councilmember can request, by bringing up a point of procedure, to have an item moved forward. He stated thate are challenged in the months of November and December due to the lack of regular meeting aad at times things get stacked up. He doesn't always catch that we have employees or guests that need to be brought forward, so if Council would assist him. Councilmember Crawford stated that we can discuss this in December. Announcements by Mayor and Councilmembers • City and community events attended and to be attended • City Council. Committee and Liaison Assignments (see assignments below) • Continuing education events attended and to be attended • Recognition of actions by City employees 1.1 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 21- • Recognition of actions by community volunteers Mayor Carpenter recognized Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who stated he attended the following: • Trunk or Treat Event. Thanked all the staff involved in the success. • Cibolo Youth Sports Complex event. He wanted us to recognize the great work Cibolo is doing. • SCUCISD had a Veterans Ceremony out on the football, field. He did not realize how many students have family members deployed. • Steve Simonson Volunteer appreciation dinner. Great event and thanked all those involved. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember following: • Veterans Day Celebration at our Memo, everyone involved. • Schertz Housing Authority meeting. They was published in the Schertz Magazine. L the future. he attended the Great turn out and thanked their thanks for the article that ward to additional publicity in Councilmember Crawford who stated he attended the + Veterans Day Celebration at our Memorial. Plaza. Thanked everyone involved. • ibolo Youth Sports Complex event. • Northeast Partnership for Economic Development monthly luncheon meeting. Lastly, regarding the election, he appreciated everyone's long hours and work and he has not heard any comments regarding the ability of Guadalupe county voters being able to go the vote centers, but he likes that concept. He thanked those involved making this happen. Mayor Carpenter also commented on the election and the great work involved. He stated over the last few years Ms. Dennis has worked with the Election Administrators to run our elections. He thanked her for a job well done. 11 -14 -2017 Minutes Page - 22 - 18. Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR City of Schertz Economic Development Corporation • Payment notification of the Small Business Grant per the Economic Development Performance Agreement with Evestra, Inc. Adiournment As there was no further business, Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at 9:37 p.m. Brenda Dennis, City Secretary 11 -14 -201.7 Minutes Page - 23 - MINUTES SPECIAL MEETING November 20, 2017 . A Special Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on November 20, 2016, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to -wit: Mayor Michael Carpenter Councilmember Mark Davis Councilmember Scott Larson Councilmember Angelina Kiser Councilmember Elect David Scagliola Staff Present: Executive Director Brian James Assistant to City Manager Sarah Gonzalez Mayor Carpenter called the meeting to order (Councilmember Cra Councilmember Crawfor flags of the United States Mayor Gary Mayor Carpenter welcomed Cibolo Elect Stosh Bovl . opening im Mayor Pro -Tem Cedric Edwards Councilmember Ralph Gutierrez Councilmember Robin Thomnso City 1 6 41 ohn Kessel "harles Zech Brenda Dennis T by the pledges of allegiance to the lo- Universal City Independent School District Board estbrook who were in the audience. Elect Member Mr. Joel Hicks and Cibolo Mayor Mayor Carpenter welcomed former Councilmembers Mr. Jim Fowler, Mr. Carl Douglas and Mr. Grumpy Azzoz. Mayer Carpenter welcomed Dr. Scagliola who is newly elected and elected back to the City Council this evening. 1. Resolution. No. 1.7 -R -1.06 — Consideration and/or action approving a Resolution canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the November 7, 2017 General Election; and other matters in connection therewith. (M. Carpenter /B. Dennis) The following was read into record: 11 -20 -2017 Minutes Page - 1 - RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -106 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, APPROVING THE CANVASS OF THE NOVEMBER 7, 2017 GENERAL ELECTION AND DECLARING THE RESULTS OF SUCH ELECTION Mayor Carpenter recognized City Secretary Brenda Dennis who provided the following information regarding the official results of the November 7, 2017 General and Special Election: Citv Council Place 5 David L. Sca liola 22 631 "j,''27 1 403 108 Robin. Thompson, 17 572 t 39 353 981 s stated that with these results, Scott Larson is re- elected to City Council Place 3, vards is re- elected to City Council. Place 4 and David Scagliola is elected to City ace 5. Mayor Carpenter recognized City Secretary Brenda Dennis who provided the roll call votes for item 1. Mayor Carpenter stated that before he entertains a motion he stated that he would also like to thank all those here that ran and did not prevail; thank you for stepping forward in choosing to be a part of the process. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -106 canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the General and Special Election. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro - 11-20 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - Early Voting Election:Day Comal / Carnal I Total Votes Bexar Guadalupe Bexar Guadalupe Cast City Council Place 3 Scott Larson 24 788 36 477 1325 Dani Salas 13 384 9 253 679 City Council Place 4 Cedric Edwards 35 10,45 52 653 1785 Citv Council Place 5 David L. Sca liola 22 631 "j,''27 1 403 108 Robin. Thompson, 17 572 t 39 353 981 s stated that with these results, Scott Larson is re- elected to City Council Place 3, vards is re- elected to City Council. Place 4 and David Scagliola is elected to City ace 5. Mayor Carpenter recognized City Secretary Brenda Dennis who provided the roll call votes for item 1. Mayor Carpenter stated that before he entertains a motion he stated that he would also like to thank all those here that ran and did not prevail; thank you for stepping forward in choosing to be a part of the process. Mayor Carpenter recognized Councilmember Thompson who moved, seconded by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards to approve Resolution No. 17 -R -106 canvassing the returns and declaring the results of the General and Special Election. The vote was unanimous with Mayor Pro - 11-20 -2017 Minutes Page - 2 - Tem Edwards, Councilmembers Davis, Gutierrez, Larson, Thompson, Kiser and Crawford voting for and no one voting no. Motion passed. Mayor Carpenter stated that before we administer the oaths of office our Charter compels us always at Council meetings give an opportunity to speak and opened it up to the public to address Council. Mayor Carpenter recognized the following who spoke: • Former Councilmember Jim Fowler, 1057 Boxer Pass, who stated when he looks at the seven member of Council he knows it's been a learning experience for everyone to work together. Mr. Fowler stated that he had to admit with Dr. Scagliola started to run for Council he thought that there is not a very good track record running against an incumbent, but he pulled it off. Mr. Fowler thanked Scott for running and remembers sitting down with him when he was thinking about running and thinks he is finding that it is a little different than what he thought. He reminded Scott that there are six other members and you learn together. You learn to compromise and learn to know when to make your stand, and that is for the citizens. Mr. Fowler addressed Cedric commenting on not having 'an opponent and that he lucked out. He mentioned that while he was on Council he was cane of the ones he looked to. They became friends and had prayer time together and continues to do so. Mr. Fowler stated that he is glad Council still opens with prayer:: Mr. Fowler wished everyone great success. • Mr. Carl Douglas, 2550 Woodland Village Places who address council stating that he was one of the first Councilmembers to meet in this - building xid at the time there were only five members. He stated it has now expanded to seven, if it is not what you want it to be, stay the course and you can get it to"bl e what you want it to be. It is not necessarily what you want it to be, you are representing the citizens of the City of Schertz. Listen to them, do what they say, it may not be exactly what you, want but the art :of compromise comes in, they can put you in and they can take you, out. Pay` attention to ,''the citizens, and if it is not what you want in conjnnctiri with the citie, you'can get there. All you have to do is work among yourself and it will happen:, • Cibolo Council Elect Joel Hicks, who also congratulated everyone and is looking forward to working together with open arms and this community. He also looks forward to working with the School District.. Mayor Carpenter stated that at this time he would like to open it up for Council to have an opportunity prior to the Oaths of office and then after he will open it up to those that were sworn in. Mayor Carpenter recognized the following members of Council: • Councilmember Ralph. Gutierrez who stated that as we bid farewell it is difficult to say good bye to a colleague. He stated that you have been a pillar to our community with unwavering support and encouragement. Your time and efforts have made the City of Schertz a better 11 -20 -2017 Minutes Page - 3 - place to live. The city appreciates your exceptional dedication to our community and he sincerely wishes him continued success in his endeavors. This was read towards Councilmember Thompson. • Councilmember Larson thanked the citizens of Schertz for the opportunity to continue to serve. To Councilmember Thompson he wants to say thank you for your time and faithful service and the wonderful things he has done for the community. He stated we will miss you and to Dr. Scagliola we are excited to have you join the team. The best days of Schertz are still ahead of us. . • Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards who stated it is always good to see change come about. Seeing the changes happening in Cibolo and changes happening around the community, not just in our city but for the growth of the whole region. He appreciates the' change. To Councilmember Thompson, thank you for your service as well. • Councilmember Crawford who addressed newly elected Mayor of Cibolo Stosh Boyle and newly elected Councilm6mber Joel Hicks thanking them for showing up this evening. This is a good sigma that we want to work together. He is thankful for those who came out to vote this year, and wishd we would have more, but that is the function of off year elections and not national elections: �Eor all those who didn't you have a chance again next year. Mayor Carpenter congratulated each of those who were reelected and elected. Mayor Carpenter thanked Councilmember Thompson for his service. Mayor Carpenter stated that every person who stands forth and chooses to serve their community in elected office, and he will speak from personal experience, you find out quickly after you are first elected that there are many things that you thought and they not quite what you thought they were. Many things that you find that you didn't know, and you thought you perhaps you did. There are many things that you continue to learn throughout the entire time that you serve. It is an extraordinary gift of time. It is incredibly time consuming and it is an act of giving to the community to stand forth. It's not always fund. 11 -20 -2017 Minutes Page - 4 - He stated to tell you the truth, when you sit in an elected office you will have people who will not like what you do, or you personally. You will not be able to please everyone all the time, its an impossibility, and that makes it a challenge, but it's a great challenge. Pushing through that is a difficult thing to do sometimes. To Councilmember Thompson for stepping fourth to choosing to serve your community, for the time you have given to the City on behalf of all the residents, the staff and this Council and his family, thank you and he appreciates your service very much. Mayor Carpenter turned the meeting back over to the City Office. 2. Oath of Office — (B. Dennis) A. Newly Elected Officers — Oath of Office. Mayor Carpenter recognized City Secretary, Brend office to newly City Officials Council Place, 3 S Edwards, Council Place 5 David L. Scagliola. B. Certificate of Election — Presentation of C Mayor Carpenter City Secret& City Council Places 3, 4 and 5, Councilmember David his place on, the dais. pres provide the Oaths of who provi+ n, Council oaths of 4 Cedric (Mayor Carpenter) newly elected officials of election. Mayor Carpenter: recognized Councilmember Scagliola who stated he lost his election three years ago and that was bitter "'sweet. But when one door closes another door opens and he was able to devote a lot of time to another pursuit of his and he accomplished that goal. Last year he ran to get back on this elected body and things have changed, it changed a lot. He learned that campaigning in the City of 1.0,000 registered voters is a whole lot different in trying to campaign in a City of over 20,000 voters. At that time the campaign turned political as well, and for the record he does not like politics. He knows it is strange coming from someone sitting up here, but he doesn't like politics. He does not have a lot of respect for people who want to play politics. He started thinking to himself well, if you can't handle the heat, stay out of the kitchen. Don't get involved in the political process if you don't want to get involved in politics. But you can't teach an old dog new tricks, an old crew dog. He has learned some new tricks. He learned how to get reengaged in the political process without comprising his integrity. The most important thing he learned is that together everyone accomplishes more. Team work. He stated it turns out he has a lot 11 -20 -2017 Minutes Page - 5 - of friends, he thanked those that showed up this evening. He also thanked his family. He thinks it is interesting that some of his friends do not get along with his other friends, that's ok because they found something that could bring them together. They shared a common belief, they believed in him. They believed that he could make a positive difference in the city once again. They came out and supported him, gave him encouragement. They encouraged him to go above and beyond what he even thought he was able to accomplish. In away this is their victory every bit as it is his. He is sitting in this seat now and he remembers a long time ago that he made a pledge to the residents of the city. He will make another one now, and he wrote this one down. He pledges to use his skills and experiences to represent you the residents of this City. As we embrace the challenges and opportunities of tomorrow and remembering the traditions of the past. He stated the last time he made a pledge he believes he lived up to it. He asked do you think he will lie up to this one? His answer was yes. He will do his best. Mayor Carpenter thanked Councilmember Scagliola once again.,,, As there was no further business, Mayor Carpenter mentioned that there are refreshments back in the confereneI room for those who would like to stay and take photos. He again thanked:4hose for joining us particularly the newly elected officials, the former elected officials and currently elected officials that are, servJug us and all the guests. Adjournment Mayor Carpenter adjourned the meeting at R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City S 11 -20 -2017 Minutes Page - 6 - Agenda No. 2 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Subject: City Secretary Boards, Commissions and Committee Member Appointments The City Secretary's Department recently received an application from Ms. Kimberly Smith who desires to be placed on the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board as an Alternate Member. Ms. Smith's application was vetted through the interview committee where they agreed to recommend to Council the appointment. The Planning & Zoning Commission recently nominated Mr. Glen Outlaw to serve as their liaison on the Committee of Committees Advisory Board filling the vacancy of Mr. Michael Dahle. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approving the appointment of Ms. Kimberly Smith as an Alternate Member to the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board and appoint Mr. Glen Outlaw to the Committee of Committees Advisory Board. ATTACHMENT Application (Council only) Agenda No. 3 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Administration Subject: Scheduling a Regular Meeting on December 19, 2017 and Cancelling the December 26, 2017 and January 2, 2018 As per the 2017 City of Schertz Master Calendar, staff recommends holding a regular Council meeting for Tuesday, December 19, 2017. Staff also recommends cancelling the December 26, 2017 and January 2, 2018 . meetings in observance of the upcoming holidays. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve the scheduling of a Regular Council meeting for Tuesday, December 19, 2017, and cancelling the December 26, 2017 and January 2, 2018 Regular meetings. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Public Works Agenda No. 4 Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -M -48 — An Ordinance Authorizing an Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement associated with the Schertz Retail Center Subdivision. (Final Reading) Section 21.1.5.2, d of the City of Schertz Unified Development Code (UDC) requires developers to extend water and wastewater utilities to serve all lots in the subdivision and to extend across the entire frontage of the subdivision adjacent to a street or thoroughfare to provide for the orderly extension of the systems. CVS Pharmacy, Inc., (CVS) is proposing to develop the Schertz Retail Center Subdivision at the southwest corner of the intersection of FM 1103 and Old Wiederstein Road. Water and wastewater main extensions are required to meet the UDC requirements. The water main extension is required to run from FM 1103, along Old Wiederstein Road, to the end of the frontage of the subdivision. During the planning stage of the subdivision, it was identified that in order to provide a better public system — both for this proposed subdivision and the City's system overall — the water line should be extended further along Old Wiederstein. Road, to Fairfax Road, and along Fairfax Road to connect to an existing line in Sunridge Road. That will provide a looped connection for the extension and alleviate a dead end main condition. Dead end water mains are undesirable because they create a potential occurrence of stagnant water and require regular maintenance to flush the line. In order to have the construction done in the most efficient and cost effective manner, the Developer has agreed to include construction of the City's portion of the infrastructure in their infrastructure installation contract and have the City provide reimbursement of the costs. The required portions and proposed additional (City- reimbursed) portions of the infrastructure are shown on the attached two -page Utility Exhibit. City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of November 14, 2017. Goal Approval of Ordinance 1.7 -M -48 authorizing the Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement. City Council Memorandum Page 2 Community Benefit Participating with the Developer of the CVS Pharmacy, Inc. Subdivision will act to alleviate the need to flush another dead -end main and provide a fresh continuous flow of water through the cities mains by eliminating an un- necessary dead end main blow -off point. Summary of Recommended Action Staff recommends Council approve the ordinance authorizing the City to enter into the Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement with CVS Pharmacy Inc. FISCAL IMPACT The cost for construction of the water main extension improvements to be reimbursed to the Developer is a not to exceed amount of $77,897.57 and will be paid out of water contingencies in the water budget. (The overall subdivision improvement cost is $316,951.76 with the developer's portion being $239,054.19.) Cost tabulations are attached. The developer has notified the City that this work will now be done by a different contractor than the one that prepared these initial costs. Staff is working with the developer to affirm that the City's cost will not change and staff will have that before the second reading of this ordinance. Staff recommends approval of final reading of Ordinance 17 -M -48. ATTACHMENTS Ordinance 1.7 -M -48 Developer Reimbursement Agreement Utility Exhibit Cost Tabulation ORDINANCE NO. 17 -M -48 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH CVS PHARMACY, INC., FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A WATER LINE EXTENSION ASSOCIATED WITH THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER; AND ESTABLISHING AN EFFECTIVE DATE HEREOF WHEREAS, a water main needs to be extended from FM 1103 at Old Wiederstein Road to Fairfax Drive to connect to an existing main on Sunridge Drive within the Riata Subdivision. WHEREAS, a water main extension across the frontage of the proposed Schertz Retail Center property is being built in accordance with the City's Unified Development Code. WHEREAS, the water main needs to be extended beyond the frontage of the proposed development in order to loop the water main to alleviate the potential for stagnant water in a dead -end main. WHEREAS, CVS Pharmacy, Inc., as the Developer of the Schertz Retail Center Subdivision, agrees to construct the entire water main extension of which a portion is more than what is required by this development. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into the Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement in order to avoid having a dead -end main. WHEREAS, Section 212.071, et. seq. of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes municipalities to enter into a contract with a developer of a subdivision or land in the municipality to construct public improvements related to the development without complying with the competitive sealed bidding procedures of Chapter 252 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, Section 212.071, et. seq. of the Texas Local Government Code limits the participation by the municipality at a level not to exceed 30 percent of the total contract price. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CIYT OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement with CVS Pharmacy, Inc., for infrastructure that will alleviate a dead -end main by looping the water main. Section 1. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 2. That should any section, clause, or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. Section 3. That it is officially found, determined and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. Approved on first reading the 14th day of November, 2017 . PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED, on final reading the 28th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: City Secretary, Brenda Dennis (CITY SEAL) CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Michael R. Carpenter M REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH DEVELOPER FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT THE STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § This Development Agreement (the "Agreement ") is by and between the City of Schertz, a Texas municipal corporation (the "City"), and CVS Pharmacy, Inc., owner and developer of certain hereinafter described property located within the City (the "Developer "), all collectively referred to as "Parties ", and is effective upon the execution of this Agreement by the Developer and the City (the "Effective Date "). WHEREAS, Developer wishes to develop certain property (the "Property ") located within the City limits, which is approximately 6.850 acres of land situated in the Rafael Garza Survey No. 98, Abstract No. 1.38, in the City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas; being portion of a 2.00 Acre Tract of Land Described in Volume 1474, Page 960, Being that same tract of Land as described as 1.91 Acres in Deed of Trust as recorded in Volume 3172 Page 535 and portion of a 10.0 Acre Tract of Land Described in Volume 1969, Page 269 of the Official Public Records or Guadalupe County, Texas. WHEREAS, the Property is the subject of the application for Subdivision Plat establishing Schertz Retail Center; and WHEREAS, the Property abuts an existing subdivision and ROW wherein all water and sewer infrastructure (collectively the "Improvements ") from the intersection of FM 1.1.03 and Old Wiederstein Road, to Fairfax Road and along Fairfax Road to Sunridge Road have not been completed; and WHEREAS, during the development planning stage for the Property, the Developer submitted to the City a request that the City participate in the completion of the Improvements, which will benefit portions of the City beyond the Schertz Retail. Center Subdivision; and WHEREAS, the City has no immediate plans to construct the required Improvements, but is willing to share in the cost of the construction of such facilities, and has funds appropriated and available to do so; and WHEREAS, Developer has requested that it be allowed to construct the required Improvements to serve the Property, and share the costs with the City; and WHEREAS, Section 212.071, et. seq. of the Texas Local Government Code authorizes municipalities to enter into a contract with a developer of a subdivision or land in the municipality to construct public improvements related to the development without complying with the competitive sealed bidding procedures of Chapter 252 of the Texas Local Government Code; and WHEREAS, Section 212.071, et. seq. of the Texas Local Government Code limits the participation by the municipality at a level not to exceed 30 percent of the total contract price. NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and mutual obligations, covenants, and benefits hereinafter set forth, the Parties agree as follows: ARTICLE I — Definitions. The following terms and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed hereto: 1.1. "Agreement" means this agreement, including any amendments hereto, between. the City and Developer. 1.2. "Contractor" shall mean the person, firm, corporation, partnership, association, or other entity awarded the contact by Developer for the construction and installation of the Improvements. 1.3. " hmprovements" shall mean the improvements described on Exhibit "A" 1.4. "City's Participation Costs" shall mean costs associated with the construction of the Improvements, as designated on Exhibit `B" as City of Schertz responsibility. ARTICLE II — Construction of Improvements. 2.1. Construction of Improvements. Developer agrees to construct the Improvements in accordance with the plans and specifications approved by the City Engineer as illustrated in Exhibit "A" attached hereto. No change in the construction plans shall be made by Developer without the prior written consent of the City Engineer. The entire cost of the construction of the Improvements shall be the responsibility and obligation of Developer, except as herein provided. 2.2. Contracts for Construction. Developer shall contract with a qualified Contractor to construct the Improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The City Engineer shall review all contract documents and costs estimates, and shall approve the Contractor prior to the award of the contract for the Improvements. Developer shall be solely responsible for payment of the work as it is completed, and shall make all payments in a timely manner to the Contractor, sub - contractors, and other parties involved in the construction of the Improvements. 2.3. Performance, Payment and Maintenance Bonds. Developer shall post within the City faithful performance, payment, and maintenance bonds for construction of the Improvements to ensure completion of the project. The bond must be executed by a corporate surety in accordance with Chapter 2253, Texas Government Code. 2.4. Inspection. The City Engineer or designee shall periodically inspect the construction of the Improvements in the same manner, and shall possess the same authority, as is provided during the construction of subdivision improvements pursuant to the City of Schertz Subdivision Ordinance, as amended. 2.5. Insurance. The Contractor awarded the contract to construct the Improvements shall be required to carry Worker's Compensation Insurance on his employees and public liability and property damage insurance on his equipment and employees. The public liability insurance shall be not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00) per person and one million dollars ($1,000,000.00) per occurrence, with property damage insurance of not less than five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000.00). In addition, City shall be furnished with Certificates of Insurance and shall be named an additional named insured on such Certificates, and City shall be notified within thirty calendar days of any cancellation of such insurance. 2.6. Accounting. Developer shall submit to City a complete accounting of all costs incurred by Developer in the construction of the Improvements. City will not contribute or pay for any costs incurred by Developer which were not approved by City prior to it being incurred. Developer shall maintain the accounting of the Improvements for a period of two years from the date of acceptance by the City, and the City may inspect the Developer's books and records related to the Improvements at any time with reasonable notice. 2.7. Indemnity. Developer agrees to protect, indemnify and save City harmless from and against all claims, demands and causes of action of every kind and character arising in favor of any third party on account of, or resulting from, the performance of this Agreement by Developer or Developer's agents, representatives, employees, contractors, or subcontractors. ARTICLE III — Obligations and Payments. 3. 1. City Obligations. The City agrees to pay to Developer City's Participation Costs which shall equate to the actual costs for the City's responsibility at as illustrated on Exhibit "A". Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to contrary, City's Obligation shall only b e for the reimbursement of costs incurred by Developer and shall not in any event exceed Seventy-Seven Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety-Seven Dollars and Fifty-Seven Cents ($77,897.57) (hereinafter the "City's Share"). 3.2. Payment Procedures. City shall deliver to Developer full payment of the City's Share as provided in this this section. 3.2.1 Submittal and review. Developer shall submit and the City Engineer shall review documentation, as may be reasonably required by City Engineer, showing final, actual construction costs paid by the Developer. 3.2.2 Upon the City Engineer's review and approval of the documents, a final inspection on the Improvements shall be conducted, noting any required corrections or repairs. Once corrections or repairs are made and deemed acceptable, the City will accept the Improvements. 3.2.3 Within 30 days of acceptance of the Improvements, the City will pay to Developer the City's Share. Any additional costs above Seventy- Seven. Thousand Eight Hundred Ninety -Seven Dollars and Fifty -Seven Cents ($77,897.57) must be approved by the City prior to being incurred. Article IV — Assignment, Modification and Waiver. 4.1. Assignment. This Agreement shall bind and benefit the respective Parties and their legal successors and shall not be assignable, in whole or in party, by any party without first obtaining written consent of the other party. 4.2. Amendment or Modification. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, this Agreement shall be subject to change, amendment or modification only in writing, and by the signatures and mutual consent of the Parties. 4.3. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be for the sole and exclusive benefit of the Parties hereto and shall not be construed to confer any rights upon any third party. 4.4. Remedies Not Exclusive. The rights and remedies contained in this Agreement shall not be exclusive, but shall be cumulative of all rights and remedies now or hereinafter existing, by law or in equity. 4.5. Waiver. The failure of any party to insist in any one or more instances on the performance of any of the terms, covenants or conditions of this Agreement, or to exercise any of its rights, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of such term, covenant, or condition, or right with respect to further performance. 4.6. Entire Agreement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the Parties related to the subject matter of this Agreement and supersedes any and all prior agreements, whether oral or written, dealing with the subject matter of this Agreement. 4.7. Venue. This Agreement shall be performable and enforceable in Guadalupe County, Texas, and shall be construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas. 4.8. Severability. If any term or provision of this Agreement is held to be invalid, void or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the remainder of the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect and shall not in any way be invalidated, impaired or affected. 4.9. Notices. Any notice provided or permitted to be given under this Agreement must be in writing and may be served by (i) depositing the same in the United States mail, addressed to the party to be notified, postage prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested; or (ii) by delivering the same in person to such party; or (iii) by overnight or messenger delivery service that retains regular records of delivery and receipt; or (iv) by facsimile; provided a copy of such notice is sent within one (l) day thereafter by another method provided above. The initial addresses of the parties for the purpose of notice under this Agreement shall be as follows: If to City: CITY OF SCHERTZ 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, TX 78154 Attention: City Manager With copy to: Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal & Zech, P.C. 2417 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, TX 78212 Attention: Charles Zech If to Developer: CVS Pharmacy Inc. 1 CVS Drive, Woonsocket, RI 02895 4.10. No Joint Venture. Nothing contained in this Agreement is intended by the Parties to create a partnership or joint venture between the Parties and any implication to the contrary is hereby expressly disavowed. It is understood and agreed that this Agreement does not create a joint enterprise, nor does it appoint either Party as an agent of the other for any purpose whatsoever. Except, as otherwise specifically provided herein, neither Party shall in any way assume any of the liability of the other for acts of the other or obligations of the other. 4.11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be considered an original, but all of which constitute one instrument. [Signatures and acknowledgments on the following pages-] Signature Page to Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement This Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. Developer: CVS PHARMACY, INC. by: Name: Kimberly A. Shardlow Title: Assistant Secretary THE STATE OF COUNTY OF This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017 by Kimberly A. Shardlow, Assistant Secretary for CVS Pharmacy Inc,., for the purposes herein expressed. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: Signature Page to Agreement with Developer for Construction of Public Improvement This Community Facilities Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. City: CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas municipal corporation By: Name: John C. Kessel, its City Manager THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2017 by John C. Kessel, City Manager of the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: EXHIBIT A IMPROVEMENTS EXHIBIT B CITY'S PARTICIPATION COSTS UTILITY NOTES: 1) GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. WILL PROVIDE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE POLE TO THE TRANSFORMER PAD. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TWO 5" PVC (SCH 80) CONDUITS AND A PULL STRING FROM THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE POLE TO THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THREE 5" PVC CONDUITS AND SECONDARY WIRING FROM THE TRANSFORMER PAD TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POWER SERVICE INSTALLATION AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE POWER COMPANY FOR FINAL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT LOCATIONS. 2) CENTERPOINT ENERGY WILL PERFORM THE GAS SERVICE CONNECTION, INSTALL THE CONDUIT, AND SET THE METER FOR THE BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE SERVICE FROM THE METER INTO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY. 3) CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 3" PVC CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING, FROM THE EXISTING TELEPHONE SERVICE POLE TO THE TELEPHONE BOARD IN THE BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO PROVIDE A #6 GROUND WIRE AT THE TELEPHONE BOARD FOR THE TELEPHONE COMPANY TO INSTALL A PHONE LINE. 4) CITY OF SCHERTZ WILL FURNISH THE DOMESTIC WATER METER, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT AND PERFORM THE TAP AND INSTALLATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL THE METER BOX, DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND ENCLOSURE, AND THE WATER SERVICE LINE FROM THE WATER METER TO THE BUILDING. 5) CITY OF SCHERTZ WILL FURNISH THE IRRIGATION METER, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT AND PERFORM THE TAP AND INSTALLATION.. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL THE METER BOX, DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND ENCLOSURE, AND THE IRRIGATION LINES TO THE AREAS SPECIFIED ON THIS SHEET AND ON SHEET 1 -1. 6) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AS REQUIRED WITH CITY OF SCHERTZ INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 7) THIS SITE INDICATES POTABLE WATER SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER LATERALS. THIS WORK TO BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED PLUMBER IF STATE LAW REQUIRES. ALL WORK MUST BE INSPECTED BY CITY OF SCHERTZ CODES AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT. 8) ALL ON -SITE PVC PIPE SHALL HAVE CLASS B BEDDING. 9) ALL CONDUIT, PIPE, AND CHASE PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH THE APPROPRIATE LOCATION WIRE AND TAPE. 10) NO PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON FIRE LINES. ALL FIRE LINES ARE TO BE INSPECTED BY CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE SERVICE PRIOR TO COVERING. 11) NOTIFY WATER AND SEWER INSPECTOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 12) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS INCLUDING ALL RIM ELEVATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS, PIPE SIZES, AND PIPE MATERIAL FOR ALL PUBLIC MAINS TO THE ENGINEER AS SOON AS INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 13) OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SANITARY SEWER, WATER, DRAINAGE EASEMENT(S) DUE TO MAINTENANCE OF SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAIN OF CITY OF SCHERTZ. 14) CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE ON -SITE SERVICE LATERALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS BY POT HOLING THE LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE LINES SURVEYED, INCLUDING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION, AND THE SURVEYED POINTS SENT TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO DETERMINE IF ANY UTILITY CONFLICTS WILL AFFECT THE CURRENT SANITARY SEWER DESIGN. 15) PVC WATER LINES LESS THAN 3" SHALL BE ASTM D 2241, SDR 21 WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D 2672. PVC WATER LINES 3" AND LARGER SHALL BE AWWA C900, RATED DR 18 (CLASS 150) WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D3139. DIP WATER LINES SHALL BE AWWA C151, THICKNESS CLASS 50. 16) PVC SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE ASTM D 3034, RATED SDR 35 WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D 3034, TABLE 2, WITH FACTORY SUPPLIED ELECTROMETRIC GASKETS AND LUBRICANT. DIP SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE ASTM A746, CLASS 50 WITH AWWA C111, RUBBER GASKET JOINT DEVICES. 17) DEMOLISHED UTILITIES NOT DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. REFER TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 18) CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT ANY SIDEWALK OR PAVEMENT THAT IS TO BE REMOVED FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT AND EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS REMOVED /ALTERED DURING INSTALLATION OF WATER LINE. CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITION OF SIDEWALK AND PAVEMENT. 19) THE CONTRACTOR MUST FOLLOW AND ABIDE BY STANDARD NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN THE STANDARD DETAILS FOR THE CITY OF SCHERTZ PUBLIC WORKS. PLEASE REFER TO THE DETAIL SHEETS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SET FOR DETAILS. SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER EXHIBIT A iPS ♦ / t / I / r � / t \ \ \\ PROPOSED 30' >. UTILITY EASEMENT \ V A PROPOSED 6" SANITARY SEWER V A LATERAL FOR FUTURE \ EXISTING 95' DEVELOPMENT TIE IN \ V A UTILITYEASEMENT WATER CONNECTION DETAIL CONTRACTOR TO \ (2) 12" VALVES BUILT INTO EACH INSTALL WATER TEE GATE VALVE AND PLUG FOR FUTURE CONNECTION -'" / CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE $!� EXISTING BEND AND INSTALL 12" X 12" X 12" LATERAL TEE a 20 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE CONTRACTOR TO 12" X 12" X 12" WATER TEE STUB 12" WATER MAIN FOR FUTURE CONNECTION 3 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE 146.25 DEGREE WATER BEND 12" INLINE VALVE 81 107 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE PROPOSED 16' WATER EASEMENT � I � I i N ` o NcA_ Knowwhat'sbelow Call before you dig V- 206 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE 12" INLINE VALVE ♦ �— PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY "i (CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY s DETAIL) 302 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE EXISTING WA TER MAIN CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 4' FROM THE EXISTING MAIN TO THE PROPOSED MAIN. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CITY OF SCHERTZ PAVED AREA TRENCH DETAIL FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION (TRENCH TO BE 6' WIDE CENTERED ON MAIN INSTALL, TOFF FACE OF CURB) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF SCHERTZ INSPECTOR FOR FLOWABLE FILL AREAS (REFER TO DETAIL C -7) APPROXIMA TE LOCA TION OF SANITARYFORCE MAIN SEE WATER CONNECTION DETAIL INSERT y' 115 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE PORTION OF CONCRETE RIPRAP FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT AT EXTENTS OF TRENCH AND REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH SAME CONCRETE THICKNESS) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY DETAIL) rCVS pharmacy TM 14,698-LEFT i ■i ►I ■O ENGINEER: FORE Foresite Group, Inc. 1999 Bryan St. Suite 890 Dallas, TX 75201 CONSULTANT: REVISIONS: CITY COMMENTS 03/20/2017 CITY COMMENTS 03/30/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/04/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/06/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/10/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/17/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/18/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/19/2017 DRAWING BY: DK DATE: 02/24/2017 JOB NUMBER: 164.079 TITLE: UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C�3. COMMENTS: NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION LEGEND EXISTING FENCE LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE 0HP 0HP 11)HP EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE — w — IN EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING STORM LINE CATV CATV PROPOSED CABLE TELEVISION LINE — FOC FOC FOC — PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC LINE —OHP OHP OHP— PROPOSED OVERHEAD POWER LINE UG(E UGIE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND POWER LINE uGIT UGrr PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE — GAS GAS GAS — PROPOSED GAS LINE — SS SS SS — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE —w w w— PROPOSED WATER LINE —Fw Fw Fw— PROPOSED FIRE WATER LINE ..__ _... PROPOSED STORM LINE PROPOSED UTILITY TRENCH AND PAVEMENT SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER EXHIBIT A iPS ♦ / t / I / r � / t \ \ \\ PROPOSED 30' >. UTILITY EASEMENT \ V A PROPOSED 6" SANITARY SEWER V A LATERAL FOR FUTURE \ EXISTING 95' DEVELOPMENT TIE IN \ V A UTILITYEASEMENT WATER CONNECTION DETAIL CONTRACTOR TO \ (2) 12" VALVES BUILT INTO EACH INSTALL WATER TEE GATE VALVE AND PLUG FOR FUTURE CONNECTION -'" / CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE $!� EXISTING BEND AND INSTALL 12" X 12" X 12" LATERAL TEE a 20 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE CONTRACTOR TO 12" X 12" X 12" WATER TEE STUB 12" WATER MAIN FOR FUTURE CONNECTION 3 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE 146.25 DEGREE WATER BEND 12" INLINE VALVE 81 107 LF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE PROPOSED 16' WATER EASEMENT � I � I i N ` o NcA_ Knowwhat'sbelow Call before you dig V- 206 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE 12" INLINE VALVE ♦ �— PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY "i (CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY s DETAIL) 302 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE EXISTING WA TER MAIN CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL SEPARATION OF 4' FROM THE EXISTING MAIN TO THE PROPOSED MAIN. CONTRACTOR TO FOLLOW CITY OF SCHERTZ PAVED AREA TRENCH DETAIL FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION (TRENCH TO BE 6' WIDE CENTERED ON MAIN INSTALL, TOFF FACE OF CURB) CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH CITY OF SCHERTZ INSPECTOR FOR FLOWABLE FILL AREAS (REFER TO DETAIL C -7) APPROXIMA TE LOCA TION OF SANITARYFORCE MAIN SEE WATER CONNECTION DETAIL INSERT y' 115 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE PORTION OF CONCRETE RIPRAP FOR WATER MAIN INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT AT EXTENTS OF TRENCH AND REMOVE AND REPLACE WITH SAME CONCRETE THICKNESS) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY (CONTRACTOR TO REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY DETAIL) rCVS pharmacy TM 14,698-LEFT i ■i ►I ■O ENGINEER: FORE Foresite Group, Inc. 1999 Bryan St. Suite 890 Dallas, TX 75201 CONSULTANT: REVISIONS: CITY COMMENTS 03/20/2017 CITY COMMENTS 03/30/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/04/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/06/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/10/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/17/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/18/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/19/2017 DRAWING BY: DK DATE: 02/24/2017 JOB NUMBER: 164.079 TITLE: UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C�3. COMMENTS: NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION UTILITY NOTES: 1) GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. WILL PROVIDE UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL SERVICE FROM THE EXISTING SERVICE POLE TO THE TRANSFORMER PAD. CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE TWO 5" PVC (SCH 80) CONDUITS AND A PULL STRING FROM THE EXISTING ELECTRICAL SERVICE POLE TO THE PROPOSED TRANSFORMER LOCATION. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR INSTALLING THREE 5" PVC CONDUITS AND SECONDARY WIRING FROM THE TRANSFORMER PAD TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE POWER SERVICE INSTALLATION AND SHALL COORDINATE WITH THE POWER COMPANY FOR FINAL UNDERGROUND CONDUIT LOCATIONS. 2) CENTERPOINT ENERGY WILL PERFORM THE GAS SERVICE CONNECTION, INSTALL THE CONDUIT, AND SET THE METER FOR THE BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THE SERVICE FROM THE METER INTO THE PROPOSED BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY. 3) CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL A 3" PVC CONDUIT WITH PULL STRING, FROM THE EXISTING TELEPHONE SERVICE POLE TO THE TELEPHONE BOARD IN THE BUILDING. THE CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO PROVIDE A #6 GROUND WIRE AT THE TELEPHONE BOARD FOR THE TELEPHONE COMPANY TO INSTALL A PHONE LINE. 4) CITY OF SCHERTZ WILL FURNISH THE DOMESTIC WATER METER, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT AND PERFORM THE TAP AND INSTALLATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL THE METER BOX, DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND ENCLOSURE, AND THE WATER SERVICE LINE FROM THE WATER METER TO THE BUILDING. 5) CITY OF SCHERTZ WILL FURNISH THE IRRIGATION METER, HOWEVER THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO FURNISH ALL EQUIPMENT AND PERFORM THE TAP AND INSTALLATION.. THE CONTRACTOR MUST PROVIDE AND INSTALL THE METER BOX, DOUBLE CHECK BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND ENCLOSURE, AND THE IRRIGATION LINES TO THE AREAS SPECIFIED ON THIS SHEET AND ON SHEET 1 -1. 6) CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE AS REQUIRED WITH CITY OF SCHERTZ INSPECTIONS DURING CONSTRUCTION FOR REQUIRED INSPECTIONS. 7) THIS SITE INDICATES POTABLE WATER SERVICE AND SANITARY SEWER LATERALS. THIS WORK TO BE INSTALLED BY A LICENSED PLUMBER IF STATE LAW REQUIRES. ALL WORK MUST BE INSPECTED BY CITY OF SCHERTZ CODES AND INSPECTION DEPARTMENT. 8) ALL ON -SITE PVC PIPE SHALL HAVE CLASS B BEDDING. 9) ALL CONDUIT, PIPE, AND CHASE PIPE SHALL BE WRAPPED WITH THE APPROPRIATE LOCATION WIRE AND TAPE. 10) NO PRESSURE REDUCING VALVES ARE TO BE INSTALLED ON FIRE LINES. ALL FIRE LINES ARE TO BE INSPECTED BY CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE SERVICE PRIOR TO COVERING. 11) NOTIFY WATER AND SEWER INSPECTOR PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. 12) CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A COMPLETE SET OF AS -BUILT DRAWINGS INCLUDING ALL RIM ELEVATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS, PIPE SIZES, AND PIPE MATERIAL FOR ALL PUBLIC MAINS TO THE ENGINEER AS SOON AS INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 13) OWNER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY REPAIR OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE SANITARY SEWER, WATER, DRAINAGE EASEMENT(S) DUE TO MAINTENANCE OF SEWER, WATER, STORM DRAIN OF CITY OF SCHERTZ. 14) CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE DOWNSTREAM SANITARY SEWER CONNECTION IN THE RIGHT OF WAY PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE ON -SITE SERVICE LATERALS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANS BY POT HOLING THE LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE THE LINES SURVEYED, INCLUDING HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL LOCATION, AND THE SURVEYED POINTS SENT TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO DETERMINE IF ANY UTILITY CONFLICTS WILL AFFECT THE CURRENT SANITARY SEWER DESIGN. 15) PVC WATER LINES LESS THAN 3" SHALL BE ASTM D 2241, SDR 21 WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D 2672. PVC WATER LINES 3" AND LARGER SHALL BE AWWA C900, RATED DR 18 (CLASS 150) WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D3139. DIP WATER LINES SHALL BE AWWA C151, THICKNESS CLASS 50. 16) PVC SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE ASTM D 3034, RATED SDR 35 WITH INTEGRALLY MOLDED BELL ENDS, ASTM D 3034, TABLE 2, WITH FACTORY SUPPLIED ELECTROMETRIC GASKETS AND LUBRICANT. DIP SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE ASTM A746, CLASS 50 WITH AWWA C111, RUBBER GASKET JOINT DEVICES. 17) DEMOLISHED UTILITIES NOT DEPICTED ON THIS SHEET. REFER TO THE DEMOLITION PLAN. 18) CONTRACTOR TO SAWCUT ANY SIDEWALK OR PAVEMENT THAT IS TO BE REMOVED FOR UTILITY INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR REPLACING SIDEWALK, PAVEMENT AND EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE THAT IS REMOVED /ALTERED DURING INSTALLATION OF WATER LINE. CONTRACTOR TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITION OF SIDEWALK AND PAVEMENT. 19) THE CONTRACTOR MUST FOLLOW AND ABIDE BY STANDARD NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN THE STANDARD DETAILS FOR THE CITY OF SCHERTZ PUBLIC WORKS. PLEASE REFER TO THE DETAIL SHEETS WITHIN THE DEVELOPMENT SET FOR DETAILS. SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER EXHIBIT A /PS LEGEND EXISTING FENCE LINE PROPERTY LINE EXISTING UNDERGROUND COMMUNICATION LINE \E'P 0HP Dip EXISTING OVERHEAD POWER LINE v EXISTING WATER LINE „.. EXISTING STORM LINE CATV CATV PROPOSED CABLE TELEVISION LINE —FOC FOC FOC— PROPOSED FIBER OPTIC LINE -OHP OHP OHP— PROPOSED OVERHEAD POWER LINE uGie uGie PROPOSED UNDERGROUND POWER LINE uG(r u0 /T PROPOSED UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE LINE —GAS GAS GAS— PROPOSED GAS LINE — SS SS SS — PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER LINE —w w w— PROPOSED WATER LINE —Fw Fw Fw— PROPOSED FIRE WATER LINE PROPOSED STORM LINE PROPOSED UTILITY TRENCH AND PAVEMENT SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER EXHIBIT A /PS \c / t � \ \ \ \ \ O \ \ \ . 1 ...v . 61 `\ q \ , v\ y�{ 400 / $ t , - PROPOSED 12" INLINE VALVE SGHtK I Z PAVEU AREA I HENGH DETAIL FOR WATER MAIN yz�;,..tt. # ' INSTALLATION (TRENCH TO BE 6' _�'-- 8" X 8" X 8" CUT IN WATER TEE WIDE CENTERED ON MAIN INSTALL, V — (2) 8" VALVES BUILT INTO WATER TEE 3' OFF FACE OF CURB) " — CONTRACTOR TO OPEN CUT ROADWAY FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION ' l� „ UTILITY EXHIBIT Developer Responsibility - Wastewater Developer Responsibility -Water City Responsibility - Water 37 LF LF OF 8" C900 PVC WATER LINE i 12" X 8" WATER REDUCER 7 f 89 LF LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE - t "A� APPROX/MA TEL 0CAT/ON OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE APPROX/MA TEL OCAT /ON OF ` 18" SANITARY SEWER GRAV/TYMA /N EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE i" p P` CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL y7z -" SEPARATION OF 4' FROM THE EXISTING MAIN TO THE r -" PROPOSED MAIN. --� 290 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE EXISTING GROUND MOUNTED ` TRANSFORMER (CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH GVEC DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MAINTAIN POWER SERVICE) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 45 DEGREE WATER BEND DETAIL) — THRUST BLOCK (TYP.) %VCVS pharmacy TM 14,698-LEFT DIVIVE-TUVU BU, ►lPO ENGINEER: FORES11TE Foresite Group, Inc. 1999 Bryan St. Suite 890 Dallas, TX 75201 CONSULTANT: o 214.939.7123 f 888.765.8135 w ( www.fg- inc.net REVISIONS: CITY COMMENTS 03/20/2017 CITY COMMENTS 03/30/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/04/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/06/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/10/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/18/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/19/2017 DRAWING BY: DK DATE: 02/24/2017 JOB NUMBER: 164.079 TITLE: UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C�3 ■ 1_ COMMENTS: NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION i' \c / t � \ \ \ \ \ O \ \ \ . 1 ...v . 61 `\ q \ , v\ y�{ 400 / $ t , - PROPOSED 12" INLINE VALVE SGHtK I Z PAVEU AREA I HENGH DETAIL FOR WATER MAIN yz�;,..tt. # ' INSTALLATION (TRENCH TO BE 6' _�'-- 8" X 8" X 8" CUT IN WATER TEE WIDE CENTERED ON MAIN INSTALL, V — (2) 8" VALVES BUILT INTO WATER TEE 3' OFF FACE OF CURB) " — CONTRACTOR TO OPEN CUT ROADWAY FOR WATER MAIN EXTENSION ' l� „ UTILITY EXHIBIT Developer Responsibility - Wastewater Developer Responsibility -Water City Responsibility - Water 37 LF LF OF 8" C900 PVC WATER LINE i 12" X 8" WATER REDUCER 7 f 89 LF LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE - t "A� APPROX/MA TEL 0CAT/ON OF SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE APPROX/MA TEL OCAT /ON OF ` 18" SANITARY SEWER GRAV/TYMA /N EXISTING RIGHT -OF -WAY LINE i" p P` CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM HORIZONTAL y7z -" SEPARATION OF 4' FROM THE EXISTING MAIN TO THE r -" PROPOSED MAIN. --� 290 LF OF 12" C900 PVC WATER LINE EXISTING GROUND MOUNTED ` TRANSFORMER (CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH GVEC DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MAINTAIN POWER SERVICE) PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT (REFER TO CITY OF SCHERTZ FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 45 DEGREE WATER BEND DETAIL) — THRUST BLOCK (TYP.) %VCVS pharmacy TM 14,698-LEFT DIVIVE-TUVU BU, ►lPO ENGINEER: FORES11TE Foresite Group, Inc. 1999 Bryan St. Suite 890 Dallas, TX 75201 CONSULTANT: o 214.939.7123 f 888.765.8135 w ( www.fg- inc.net REVISIONS: CITY COMMENTS 03/20/2017 CITY COMMENTS 03/30/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/04/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/06/2017 CITY COMMENTS 04/10/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/18/2017 CITY COMMENTS 4/19/2017 DRAWING BY: DK DATE: 02/24/2017 JOB NUMBER: 164.079 TITLE: UTILITIES PLAN SHEET NUMBER: C�3 ■ 1_ COMMENTS: NOT RELEASED FOR CONSTRUCTION EXHIBIT B SCHERTZ RETAIL CENTER WATER AND WASTEWATER EXTENSION COST Description Cost Quantity Unit Unit Cost Unit E manhole over existing stub $ 7,758.70 1 $ 7,758.70 LUMP 8 SDR 26 PCV Pipe $23,241.55 423 LF $ 54.94 LF 8 "x6" single clean out w Traffic Cover $ 2,263.50 1 $ 2,263.50 LUMP 5' Manholes with 32" Ring and Covers $ 28,878.80 4 $ 7,219.70 EACH 5' Risers $17,838.60 6 $ 2,973.10 EACH Road Bores with Pits $35,084.45 1 $ 35,084.45 LUMP 18 Casing $9,458.20 131 LF $ 72.20 LF 18" Ca sing Spacers and Seals $3,244.50 7 $ 463.50 EACH Detectable Warning Tape $ 167.75 1 $ 167.75 EACH Trench Excavation Protection $1,677.50 1 $ 1,677.50 LUMP Spoil Removal $ 2,200.00 1 $ 2,200.00 LUMP Manhole Testing $ 1,254.00 1 $ 1,254.00 LUMP Air Test $ 544.50 1 $ 544.50 LUMP Subtotal Offsite Sewer $ 133,612.05 12" MJ Cut In Tee with MegaLug $ 5,117.75 1 EACH $ 5,117.75 EACH 8" Ml Cut In Tee with Megalug $ 4,557.55 1 EACH $ 4,557.55 EACH 12" Ml Gate Valve with Box 1 EACH $14,694.30 8 EACH $ 1,836.79 EACH 8" Ml Gate Valve with Box $ 3,098.10 2 EACH $ 1,549.05 EACH 12" C -900 Dr -14 PVC Pipe $ 46,413.20 1220 LF $ 38.04 LF 8" C -900 Dr-14 PVC Pipe $ 598.00 37 LF $ 16.16 LF 6" PR 350 Ductile Iron Pipe $ 2,047.65 52 LF $ 39.38 LF MJ 1/32" deg Bend w Megalug $ 1,291.90 1 EACH $ 1,291.90 EACH MJ 1/16" deg Bend w Mega $ 660.90 1 EACH $ 660.90 EACH M11/8" deg Bend w Megalug $ 2,02120 3 EACH $ 674.40 EACH 12x6 MJ Anchor Tee $ 2,947.20 4 EACH $ 736.80 EACH 12 Ml Tee w Mega Lug $ 887.46 1 EACH $ 887.46 EACH 12x8 MJ Reducer w MegaLug $ 558.80 1 EACH $ 558.80 EACH 12" Vertical Offset $ 2,337.60 2 EACH $ 1,168.80 EACH 12x2 Temp Blow off $ 1,577.65 1 EACH $ 1,577.65 EACH 4 Std Hydrant Assy Complete $ 17,789.60 4 EACH $ 4,447.40 EACH 3000 PSI thrust block $ 4,033.80 5 EACH $ 806.76 EACH Detectable warning tape $ 312.25 2 EACH $ 156.13 EACH Hydrostatic Pressure Test $ 560.20 1 LUMP $ 560.20 LUMP Spoils Removal $ 4,950.00 1 LUMP $ 4,950.00 LUMP 2" asphalt repair $ 11,157.80 577 SQ. YD. $ 19.34 SQ. YD. Traffic Control $ 13,200.00 1 LUMP $ 13,200.00 LUMP Steel Plates $ 2,750.00 1 LUMP $ 2,750.00 LUMP 290 cu yds flowable Fill $ 38,280.00 290 Cu Yds $ 132.00 Cu Yds 2" adjust existing fire hydrant $ 1,244.90 1 EACH $ 1,244.90 EACH 2" demo existing meter at Tap $ 24930 1 EACH $ 249.90 EACH All costs by Five star (subdivided by Tenants) Schertz Retail Center Costs (To be split among tenants) City of Schertz Costs Cost Schertz Quantity Schertz Unit Unit Cost Unit $ - 0 EACH $ 5,117.75 EACH $ 4,557.55 1 EACH $ 4,557.55 EACH $ 1,836.79 1 EACH $ 1,836.79 EACH $ 3,098.10 2 EACH $ 1,549.05 EACH $20,315.29 534 LF $ 38.04 LF $ 598.00 37 LF $ 16.16 LF $ 1,023.83 26 LF $ 39.38 LF $ 1,29130 1 EACH $ 1,291.90 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 660.90 EACH $ 1,348.80 2 EACH $ 674.40 EACH $ 1,473.60 2 EACH $ 736.80 EACH $ - EACH $ 887.46 EACH $ 558.80 1 EACH $ 558.80 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 1,168.80 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 1,577.65 EACH $ 8,894.80 2 EACH $ 4,447.40 EACH $ 2,420.28 3 EACH $ 806.76 EACH $ 156.13 1 EACH $ 156.13 EACH $ - 0 LUMP $ 560.20 LUMP $ - 0 LUMP $ 4,950.00 LUMP $ 4,737.71 245 SQ. YD. $ 19.34 SQ. YD. $ 6,600.00 0.5 LUMP $ 13,200.00 LUMP $ 2,750.00 1 LUMP $ 2,750.00 LUMP $16,236.00 123 Cu Yds $ 132.00 Cu Yds $ - 0 EACH $ 1,244.90 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 249.90 EACH Schertz Retail Center Costs (To be split among tenants) Cost Five Star Quantity Five Star Unit Unit Cost Unit $ 5,117.75 1 EACH $ 5,117.75 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 4,557.55 EACH $ 12,857.51 7 EACH $ 1,836.79 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 1,549.05 EACH $ 26,097.91 686 LF $ 38.04 LF $ - 0 LF $ 16.16 LF $ 1,023.83 26 LF $ 39.38 LF $ - 0 EACH $ 1,29130 EACH $ 660.90 1 EACH $ 660.90 EACH $ 674.40 1 EACH $ 674.40 EACH $ 1,473.60 2 EACH $ 736.80 EACH $ 887.46 1 EACH $ 887.46 EACH $ - 0 EACH $ 558.80 EACH $ 2,337.60 2 EACH $ 1,168.80 EACH $ 1,577.65 1 EACH $ 1,577.65 EACH $ 8,894.80 2 EACH $ 4,447.40 EACH $ 1,613.52 2 EACH $ 806.76 EACH $ 156.13 1 EACH $ 156.13 EACH $ 560.20 1 LUMP $ 560.20 LUMP $ 4,950.00 1 LUMP $ 4,950.00 LUMP $ 6,420.09 332 SQ. YD. $ 19.34 SQ. YD. $ 6,600.00 0.5 LUMP $ 13,200.00 LUMP $ - 0 LUMP $ 2,750.00 LUMP $ 22,044.00 167 Cu Yds $ 132.00 Cu Yds $ 1,244.90 1 EACH $ 1,244.90 EACH $ 249.90 1 EACH $ 249.90 EACH Offsite Water Subtotal $ 183,339.71 $77,897.57 $105,442.14 Agenda No 5 0111 &WOL11"LlusI NU 10I01 [o7 710 11110 1 City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Water and Wastewater Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -T -46 — An Ordinance by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas authorizing a budget amendment to fund elevated storage tank repainting project; repealing all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict with this ordinance; and providing an effective date (Final reading) BACKGROUND On October 10, 2017 City Council authorized the City to enter into a contract with Tank Pro, Inc. for the painting of the Nacogdoches elevated storage tank. Prior to executing that contract the City needs to authorize the transfer of funds from the Water Reserves. The total project cost, including contingency is $468,537 SCHERTZ ELEVATED STORAGE TANK REPAINTING PROJECT Budgeted Expenses for Engineering and Bid Preparation: Engineering $ 35,000.00 Legal $ 500.00 Advertising $ 500.00 Other Prof. Services $ 1,000.00 Proposed Painting/Repair Expenses: Construction $ 391,537.00 Construction Contingency $ 40,000.00 Total Construction Costs $ 431,537.00 Total cost of Project $ 468,537.00 City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of November 14, 2017. Goal To extend the life of the elevated water storage tank and make necessary repairs. Community Benefit The benefit is to keep the tank in adequate condition to provide proper storage and pressure to our citizens and maintain potable drinking water services. FISCAL IMPACT City Council Memorandum Page 2 The current estimated Fund Equity for the Water & Sewer Fund is $6,904,704 which is $1,01.5,009 over the required 26 %. The amount over the requirement is the amount to be used for construction or other projects and is called the construction reserve. With this authorization, the estimated remaining amount in the construction reserve would be $546,472. City would still be above the required Fund Equity of 26% set by the City's Fund Balance Policy. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council approve final reading of Ordinance 17 -T -46, authorizing the use of the construction reserve for Repainting services for the Schertz Elevated Storage Tank Repainting Project with a not to exceed amount of $431,537.00. ATTACHMENT Ordinance 17 -T -46 ORDINANCE NO. 17 -T -46 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A BUDGET AMENDMENT TO FUND ELEVATED STORAGE TANK REPAINTING; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 17 -T -30, the City of Schertz (the "City ") adopted the budget for the City for the fiscal year 201.7 -2018 (the `Budget), which provides funding for the City's operations throughout the 2017 -2018 fiscal year; and WHEREAS, the City needs to increase the Budget to authorize expenditures of $431,537 for the funding of the Tank Repainting from the Water & Sewer Construction Reserves; and WHEREAS, the City needs to recognize a transfer from construction reserves of $431,537; and WHEREAS, City staff recommends that the City Council of the City adjust the Budget and approve the additional expense; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to adjust the Budget and approve the budget adjustment for the General Fund for the contract inspection services and the community support services, as more fully set forth in this Ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. The City shall adjust the Budget by $431,537 in the Water & Sewer Fund for the Tank Painting. Section 2. The City shall recognize the additional $431,537 in a transfer from construction reserves for the project. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. PASSED ON FIRST READING, the 14th day of November 2017. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED ON SECOND READING, the day of , 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50558021.1 - 2 - Agenda No. 6 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -K -47 Consider action on an ordinance closing and abandoning to the abutting property owner a section of Trainer Hale Road right -of. -way located approximately 850 feet south of the intersection of FM 1.51.8 and Lower Seguin Road. (Final reading) BACKGROUND Goal Schertz 1518, LTD is requesting that the City abandon a portion of the 20 -foot Trainer Hale Road right -of. -way located west of FM 1518, approximately 850 feet south of the intersection of Lower Seguin Road and FM 1518 (referred to as the ROW to be abandoned). The subject area is approximately 900 square feet, is unimproved and is immediately adjacent to property owned by Schertz 1518, LTD that is zoned as The Crossvine Planned Development District (PDD). Plans for the property immediately west of the subject area include single family residential use. The Trainer Hale Road right -of -way was previously a County road that appears to have been established based on older TxDOT plans. In 1986, . the City of Schertz annexed approximately 5,144 acres more or less, located south of Randolph Air Force Base, west of FM 1518. During this annexation, Trainer Hale Road right -of -way became a City right -of -way but segments of the roadway located near the intersection of Lower Seguin Road and FM 1.51.8 were not constructed. The two Trainer Hale Road right -of. -way segments on both sides of the intersection are currently undeveloped. Now with FM 1.518 being established, there is no longer a need for these Trainer Hale Road right -of.- way segments. Schertz 1518, LTD, the owner of the property immediately adjacent to the ROW to be abandoned, recently submitted a preliminary plat application for the proposed Module 2, Unit 1 Subdivision of the Crossvine development. The owner is requesting that the City abandon a segment of the Trainer Hale Road right -of -way so that it could be included as part of the property boundaries to be preliminary platted. City Council Memorandum Page 2 The City desires to abandon the portion of the "ROW Segment" immediately adjacent to the subject property being platted into the Module 2, Unit 1 Subdivision of the Crossvine development and to transfer ownership to the adjoining property owner as specified in the associated Ordinance. City Council approved this on first reading at their meeting of November 1.4, 2017. . Community Benefit The abandonment and release of the ROW Segment to the property owner will enable the developer to include additional land that is currently unused ROW, which will provide additional land to a planned common landscape buffer area and a portion will be constructed and rededicated as a public roadway that will be improved to provide an additional entrance for the residential project being proposed by Schertz 151.8, LTD. Summary of Recommended Action City staff recommends abandoning the Right -of -Way Segment and releasing the Right - of -Way to be abandoned to the adjacent property owner as described in Ordinance 17 -K- 47. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Final Reading of Ordinance No. 17 -K -47. ATTACHMENT Ordinance No. 17 -K -47 Right -of -Way Abandonment Request Letter Aerial. Photo of ROW to be Abandoned WHEREAS, the City of Schertz, Texas, a home rule municipality, has established a publ right-of-way immediately to the west of FM 1518, approximately 850 feet south of the intersecti of Lower Seguin Road and FM 1518, as further described on Exhibit "A", attached beret (hereinafter the "Subject Area"); and I WHEREAS, the Subject Area is located to the west of FM 1518 a TxDOT right-of- way; and WHEREAS, as a result of FM 1518 being improved, the Subject Area is no longer needed for the Trainer Hale Road Right-Of-Way; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 311 .007 of the Texas Transportation Code, a home-rule municipality may vacate, abandon, or close a street or alley. WHEREAS, the said City of Schertz has caused studies and inquiries to be made of t public in general and utility entities who might be directly affected; and I Mal 1 111 1 1119 l:I 111 11 # 1 Ma WHEREAS, on the 14th day of November, 2017, a Public Hearing was held to allow members of the public to give testimony, and comment, on the merits of the Subject Area abandonment. NOW, THEREF*RE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: Section 1. That the recitals contain in the preamble hereto are hereby found to be and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 2. That the City Council finds that such closure and abandonment as requested will cause no harm or injury to the City of Schertz or its citizens, said portion of right of way is not needed for public purpose and it is in the public interest to abandon said portion of right of way. Section 3. That the Subject Area as depicted on Exhibit "A", is hereby close"I'M abandoned and vacated insofar as the right, title or easement of the public is concerned and sh] only extend to the public right, title and easement that the City may legally and lawfully abandon, subject to the conditions of Section 4. Section 4. That the Subject Area is abandoned to the abutting owner, as authorized Section 311.007 of the Texas Transportation Code and Section 272.001 (b)(2) of the Texas Loc Government Code conditioned upon the Subject Area being platted into the property of t, abutting property owner within 12 months. The plat must not create any non-conforming lots. I Section 5. That should any section, clause, or provision of this ordinance be declared by a court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, the same shall not affect the validity of this ordinance or any other ordinance of the City as a whole or any part thereof, other than the part so declared to be invalid. Section 6. That it is officially found, determined and declared that the meeting at whi this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subje e matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this ordinance, was giv all as required by Chapter 5 5 1, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. Approved on first reading the 14'h day of November, 2017 61 1 1 MIR 311110 1 P 11111 11 0 1� 11111111 11 11 , 0' 1 ffwlffm�=81 �� CITY OF SCHERTZ Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) October 31", 2017 Bryce Cox Planner City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway, Bldg. 1 Schertz, TX 78154 Re: The Crossvine Module 2 Unit 1— ROW Abandonment Request I, Christopher K. Price , manager of Schertz 1518 Ltd., owner of the land within the Module 2 Unit 1 boundary shown in the attached exhibit would like to request that the Trainer Hale ROW area within the property be abandoned. (Owner's Signature) (Date) F- F- 0 ry 0 D -5 lfi O ..... . ....... . .. CROSSVINE M2Ul TRAINER HALE ROW VACATION 0 20' 66666p==E"`l SCALE: I" = 20' LEGEND PROP. ROW EXISTING LOT LINES & ROW TRAILER HALE ROW TO BE VACATED MALONE*WHEELER SINCE INC. 1995 CIVIL ENGINEERING *DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING* PROJECT MANAGEMENT 5113 Southwest Pkwy, Suite 260 Austin, Texas 78735 Phone: (512) 899-0601 Fax: (512) 899-0655 Firm Registration No. F-786 .C6 ti C> O Agenda No. 7 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -104 — Consideration and/or action approving a resolution authorizing an Improvement Agreement with Rolling Hills Ranch Ltd., for the construction of roadway and infrastructure improvements to Eckhardt Road related to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1. In September 2013, City Council approved a Planned Development District (PDD) rezone for The Parklands development, generally located at the intersection of Froboese Lane and Eckhardt :Road. The Parklands development is a single family residential development consisting of 505 planned single family home lots divided into 4 units. The development also includes a school site and an approximately 5 acre public park that is within Unit 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a preliminary plat for The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 on May 11, 2016 and approved the final plat on October 12, 2016. As part of the platting process the property owner requested a waiver to relocate the obligated public infrastructure improvements to Eckhardt Road from the section adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 to the intersection of IH -35 and Eckhardt Road. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved this waiver on October 12, 2016 with the following conditions: • The applicant enter into an Improvement Agreement with the City to construct the offsite improvements to Eckhardt Road and that allows for the deferral of the improvements to Eckhardt Road. • If the applicant cannot reach agreement on the terms of the Improvement Agreement, the applicant would then construct the original required improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision. • If the applicant cannot obtain the necessary additional right -of -way dedication for the offsite improvements, the applicant would then construct the original required improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision. In order to record the plat, the property owner must complete all public infrastructure improvements or enter into an Improvement Agreement to defer construction and installation of the public infrastructure improvements. City Council Memorandum Page 2 With regard to the obligation for constructing improvements to Eckhard Road, the owner will now be constructing two full lanes of Eckhardt :Road for just under 700' from the frontage road of IH 35 back to the south, and then one lane for an additional 400'. The benefit of this is that traffic from the Parklands development and Cypress Point that is utilizing Eckhardt Road now have the benefit of an improved section of Eckhardt Road at IH 35 where there is anticipated to the most traffic. Additionally with this shift of improvements at least one lane of Eckhardt Road will be improved all the way to the southernmost end of the Cypress Point development, rather than having sections of Eckhardt Road that have not been improved at all, including the section that will have the most traffic, the section near IH 35. The drawback is that the City will now be obligated to construct the improvements adjacent to the Parklands Development at some point in the future. This essentially buys the City some time. This section is on the proposed Roadway Impact Fee CIP, so if roadway impact fees are adopted, the funds collected from Service Area 1 can be used to build this section of Eckhardt Road. Goal The property owner is requesting an improvement agreement to defer roadway improvements to Eckhardt Road for up to 1 year to allow the Unit 1 plat to be recorded. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. The shifting of the Eckhardt Road improvements to the intersection of IH -35 and Eckhardt Road is beneficial to more residents and users of the road than improving the section of Eckhardt Road adjacent to Unit 1. Summary of Recommended Action While staff typically recommends against entering into agreements to defer public infrastructure installation for residential subdivisions due to risk of lots being sold that cannot be immediately developed, this situation is unique. The request from the property owner is to only defer improvements to Eckhardt Road which is an existing roadway that has had some improvements with the Cypress Point Subdivision. The infrastructure improvements within Unit 1 are not included in the request and will be finished and accepted by the City before the plat can be recorded. This will allow the subdivision to be safely developed immediately upon plat recording, even without the Eckhardt Road improvements. There have been some project delays with acquisition of the needed right -of -way and permitting through TXDOT which has delayed the anticipated construction schedule. However these issues are very near resolution and construction is anticipated to begin in first quarter 2018. It is the opinion of Staff that with the approved waiver to move the Eckhardt Road improvements to begin . at the IH -35 intersection, the improvements will benefit more residents and people who travel the road as the intersection is one of the most traveled sections of the road. City Council Memorandum Page 3 If approved, the agreement will require the property owner to post a fiscal surety to secure the public infrastructure improvements for Eckhardt Road. The property owner would then construct all improvements to Eckhardt Road within 1 year from the recording of the plat. This agreement is beneficial to both the property owner and the City. The property owner would be able to plat Unit 1 and then start home construction and the City would receive improvements to Eckhardt Road beginning at IH -35 and continuing south east completing approximately 1,095 feet of full width roadway. FISCAL IMPACT By shifting the owner of the Parklands responsibility for constructing the adjacent portion of Eckhardt Road, the City takes on that responsibility, which is estimated at about $275,000. As noted above if the roadway impact fee CIP is adopted as proposed and roadway impact fees are adopted, funds can be used for this construction. 1• Staff recommends approval of Resolution. No. 17 -R -104. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 17 -R -104 Parklands Improvements Agreement Exhibits Associated with Parklands Improvement Agreement Graphic Showing Eckhardt Road RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -104 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING AN IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission on October 1.2, 2016 granted a waiver to Section 21.14. LK of the City's Unified Development Code to allow the Owner to construct offsite improvements to Eckhardt Road from the intersection of I -35, south along Eckhardt Road for a distance that is roughly proportionate to the value of the required improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, in lieu of constructing the improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21.4.1.5(C.)(2) and (F.)(1) of the City's Unified Development Code, the obligation to construct the public improvements that serve the Subdivision may be deferred if an Improvement Agreement is executed and if sufficient surety is provided to secure the obligation to construct the public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Owner seeks to defer the construction of the public improvements to a future date, not to exceed one year, after the recording of the final plat for The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 pursuant to Section 21.4.15 of the City's Unified Development Code; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz has recommended that the City enter into an Improvement Agreement; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the Improvement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Improvement Agreement in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All resolutions or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this :Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) After Recording, Please Return To: Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal Hyde & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: T. Daniel Santee STATE OF TEXAS § § KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 — PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS This IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT (the "Agreement ") is by and between ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD (the "Owner "), and the CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas municipal corporation (the "City "), and is effective upon the execution of this Agreement by the Owner and the City (the "Effective Date "). WHEREAS, the Owner is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, more specifically described on Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the "Property" or "The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 "); WHEREAS, the Owner seeks to develop a residential subdivision on the Property (the "Subdivision ") that requires the construction of certain public improvements: and WHEREAS, this Agreement is made solely with respect to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21.4.15(C.)(2.) and (F.)(1) of the City's Unified Development Code, the obligation to construct the public improvements that serve the Subdivision may be deferred if an Improvement Agreement is executed and if sufficient surety is provided to secure the obligation to construct the public improvements; and WHEREAS, the Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission on October 1.2, 2016 granted a waiver to Section 21.14.1.K of the City's Unified Development Code to allow the Owner to construct offsite improvements to Eckhardt Road from the intersection of I -35, south along Eckhardt Road for a distance that is roughly proportionate to the value of the required improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, in lieu of constructing the improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 WHEREAS, the Owner seeks to defer the construction of the public improvements to a future date, not to exceed one year, after the recording of the final plat for The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1(the "Final Plat Recordation ") pursuant to this Agreement and Section 21.4.15 of the City's Unified Development Code: Improvement Agreement Page 1 of 10 Initials City Owner NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements set forth herein and for other reciprocal good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and stipulated by the Parties, the Owner and the City agree as follows: 1. Ownership of the Propert y. The Owner hereby represents and warrants that, as of the Effective Date, it has not conveyed, assigned, or transferred all or any portion of its interest in the Property to any other person or entity (any such person or entity referred to herein as "Purchaser "), nor is it a party to any contract or other understanding to do so that is not subject to this Agreement. 2. Construction of Improvements; Covenants. The Owner and the City covenant and agree to the following: a) The Owner is obligated by Section 21.12. 10 of the City's Unified Development Code to prepare construction plans and construct, or cause to be constructed public infrastructure improvements including roadway, sidewalk, utility, and drainage improvements for the subdivision titled The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 (such improvements shall be referred to herein as the "Improvements "). b) The Improvements shall be built and completed in accordance with City design standards within one year (1 year) after the Final Plat Recordation. c) The cost of the Improvements for The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 is estimated to be two hundred seventy six thousand one hundred two and 50 /100 Dollars ($276,102.50) (the "Cost Estimate "), as more particularly shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes. The Owner and the City agree that the amount of the Cost Estimate set forth herein is a commercially reasonable estimate of the cost of the Improvements. d) In lieu of the Owner's obligation to construct, or cause to be constructed, the Improvements, at or before the Final Plat Recordation, Owner shall provide to the City, concurrent with the execution of this Agreement, surety in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "C" (the "Surety ") in an amount equal to 125% of the Cost Estimate amount (three hundred forty five thousand one hundred twenty eight and 131100 Dollars l$345,128.131), (the "Improvement Funds "). e) Owner agrees within one year of the Final Plat Recordation to complete the construction of the Improvements in accordance with the Construction Plans and in full compliance with City of Schertz Unified Development Code Section 21.4.1.5, which is incorporated by reference herein as though fully set forth in this Section of this Agreement. For the purpose of clarification, and in no way limiting Owner's obligations under Section 21.4.15, the Parties agree that full completion of construction of the Improvements shall not occur until the City accepts the Improvements in the manner prescribed in Section 21.4.15. D., and Owner provides a maintenance bond (to expire twenty four (24) months following such acceptance) which shall be exactly twenty percent (20 %) of the Cost Estimate. Improvement Agreement Page 2 of 10 Initials City Owner f) The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a waiver on October 12, 2016 to relocate the obligated public infrastructure improvements to Eckhardt Road from the section adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 to the intersection of IH- 35 and Eckhardt :Road with the condition that if the Owner cannot obtain the necessary additional right -of way dedication for the improvements, the Owner would then construct the original required improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1. If the right -of -way needed to construct the improvements to Eckhardt :Road cannot be acquired by the Owner and dedicated to the City within 6 months after the recording of the Final Plat, the Owner shall prepare construction plans and construct or cause to be constructed the original required public infrastructure improvements to Eckhardt Road adjacent to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 in order to meet the obligations identified in Section 21.14. LK of the City's Unified Development Code. At the discretion of the City Manager or his/her designee additional time to acquire the needed right -of. -way may be granted to the Owner. g) In the event Owner fails to fully complete construction of the Improvements within one year of the Final Plat Recordation in the manner prescribed herein, City may declare this Agreement to be in default and at the City's sole discretion: (i) require that all Improvements be installed by Owner regardless of the extent of completion of the improvements on the Property at the time the Agreement is declared to be in default; (ii) unilaterally draw from the Improvement Funds sufficient amount to complete the Improvements itself or through a third party; or (iii) assign the Improvement Funds to any third party, including a subsequent owner of the Property, provided that such Improvements Funds shall only be assigned for the purpose of causing the construction of the Improvements by such third party and for no other purpose and in exchange for the subsequent owner's agreement and posting of security to complete the Improvements. h) Within 30 days of the City's acceptance of the Improvements, the City shall release the Surety to Owner and the Parties shall have no further obligation to each other under this Agreement. 3. Approval of Agreement. The City has approved the execution and delivery of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21.4.1.5(C.)(2.) of the City's Unified Development Code, and the Owner represents and warrants that it has taken all necessary action to authorize its execution and delivery of this Agreement. 4. Governmental Immunity. The City does not waive or relinquish any immunity or defense on behalf of itself, its officers, employees, Councilmembers, and agents as a result of the execution of this Agreement and the performance of the covenants and actions contained herein. Improvement Agreement Page 3 of 10 Initials City Owner 5. Binding Effect. ffect. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, representatives, successors, and assigns, and the terms hereof shall run with the Property. 6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all signatory parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 7. Integration. This Agreement is the complete agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof and cannot be varied except by the written agreement of the Owner and the City. The Owner and the City each agrees that there are no oral agreements, understandings, representations or warranties which are not expressly set forth herein. 8. Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be deemed to be delivered three (3) days after such notice is deposited in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, registered or certified mail return receipt requested, and addressed to the intended recipient at the address shown herein. Any address for notice may be changed by written notice delivered as provided herein. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and served as follows: If to the Owner: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT LTD 1616 Calle Del. Norte #48 Laredo, Texas 78041 Attention: William Alston With copes: DENTON COMMUNITIES 11 Lynn Batts Lane #100 San Antonio, Texas 7821.8 Attention: Eugene Patillo If to the City. CITY OF SCHERTZ 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: City Manager With copy to: Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal Hyde & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: T. Daniel Santee Improvement Agreement Page 4 of 10 Initials City Owner 9. Legal Construction. If any provision in this Agreement is for any reason unenforceable, to the extent the unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain among the parties, such unenforceability will not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement will be construed as if the unenforceable provision had never been a part of this Agreement. Whenever the context requires, the singular will include the plural and neuter include the masculine or feminine gender, and vice versa. Article and section headings in this Agreement are for reference only and are not intended to restrict or define the text of any section. This Agreement will not be construed more or less favorably between the parties by reason of authorship or origin of language. 10. Recitals; Exhibits. Any recitals in this Agreement are represented by the parties hereto to be accurate, constitute a part of the parties' substantive agreement, and are fully incorporated herein as matters of contract and not mere recitals. Further, any exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated herein as matters of contract and not mere exhibits. 11. No Joint Venture. It is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that the terms hereof are not intended to, and shall not be deemed to, create a partnership or joint venture among the parties. 1.2. Choice of Law. This Agreement will be construed under the laws of the State of Texas without regard to choice -of -law rules of any jurisdiction. Venue shall be in the State District Courts of Guadalupe County, Texas with respect to any lawsuit arising out of or construing the terms and provisions of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement shall constitute consent by suit by any party. [ Signatures and acknowledgments on the following pages] Improvement Agreement Page 5 of 10 Initials City Owner Signature Page to Improvement Agreement This Improvement Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § This instrument was acknowledged ,the behalf of said limited liability company (SEAL) (ham Pr- ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT LTD By: Name: Title: Date: before me on the day of , 2015 by of Rolling Hills Ranch Development Ltd., on Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: Improvement Agreement Page 6 of 10 Initials City Owner Signature Page to Improvement Agreement This Improvement Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. City: CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas municipal corporation By: Name Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF GUADALUPE § John C. Kessel, its City Manager This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2015 by John C. Kessel, City Manager of the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: Improvement Agreement Page 7 of 10 Initials City Owner EXHIBIT "A" The Property Approved final plat exhibit and Legal Metes and Bounds [See attached] Improvement Agreement Page 8 of 10 Initials City Owner EXHIBIT "B" The Cost Estimate [ See attached] Improvement Agreement Page 9 of 10 Initials City Owner EXHIBIT "C" The Surety [ See attached] Improvement Agreement Page 10 of 10 Initials City Owner W Q Z O r u- Lr r 3 a a 0 a le le 0 W N S N 0 O N Q oa �N �s x �W a� U,i m 0 cD � O O N to N N N � a� oLL EXISTING IMPROVED ECKHARDT RD. PER CYPRESS POINT OBLIGATIONS (3,303 LF), HALF SECTION EXISTING UN- IMPROVED ECKHARDT RD. ADJACENT TO PARKLANDS FRONTAGE (1,585 LF), HALF SECTION EXISTING UN- IMPROVED ECKHARDT RD. NOT ADJACENT TO PARKLANDS FRONTAGE (HALF SECTION 1, 782 LF) EXISTING UN- IMPROVED ECKHARDT RD. PER CYPRESS POINT FUTURE OBLIGATIONS (HALF SECTION, 469 + LF) PROPOSED ECKHARDT RD IMPROVEMENTS (690 LF FULL SECTION +405 HALF SECTION) 690(2) +405 =1,785 LF u 0 w 0 w z M N M rl- ,n x cl Z COO M O � N O WQ�° > m� xi-, Vf�0 `;a +�4 m � N T CO V Lua�� W 00 Z E IA a � LL V N W C d L CO WM0- �-- / SCALE: 1" =100' 0' 100' 300' � 100' EASEMENT AND ROW � m TO CITY PUBLIC SERVICE 200 � BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO, JANUARY 18,1978 IN- W O Z IMPROVED SECTION OF j E PC CKHARDT RD � l� I -441 � O uj ARROW RIDGE Y � PARKLANDS Q Q Q 722 I 758 NIT I a � - -,_ l SCALE: I"=100' 0' 100, 300' 200' YPR��S /201I�IT T/ / C ypRESS p °/ivr co Z O U W CL iJ Q U C� Clj'PRS POINT � U IT -3 ECKHA FORESTOAK T RD Y 0 � tcY RESS P z UN T -4 J J INT JOB NO. DATE: DRAWN: CHECKED: SHEET NUMBER: EX -A THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN PRODUCED FROM MATERIAL THAT WAS STORED AND /OR TRANSMITTED ELECTRONICALLY AND MAY HAVE BEEN INADVERTENTLY ALTERED. RELY ONLY ON FINAL HARDCOPY MATERIALS BEARING THE CONSULTANT'S ORIGINAL SIGNATURE AND SEAL. Exhibit A FIELD NOTES FOR A 39.39 ACRE TRACT uti1 SURVEYING FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 A 39.39 acre tract of land, out of the John Noyes Survey No. 259, Abstract No. 253 and the Carrol M. Gahogan, Jr. Survey No. 25, Abstract No. 142, Guadalupe County, Texas and being out of a 194.56 acre tract of land conveyed to Rolling Hills Ranch Development, Ltd. of record in Volume 2260 Page 355 of the Official Public Records of Guadalupe County, Texas and being more particularly described by metes and bounds as follows: BEGINNING at a found iron rod in the southeast right -of -way line of County Road No. 376D, also known as Froboese Road, for the northwest corner of a 3.164 acre tract conveyed to Raymond Hernandez of record in Document No. 200506025771 of the Official Public Records of Guadalupe County, Texas, for a northeast corner of the 194.56 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 24° 42' 23" E, along and with a northeast line of the 194.56 acre tract and the southwest line of the 3.164 acre tract, a distance of 208.78 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod, for the southwest corner of the 3.164 acre tract, the northwest corner of a 5.00 acre tract of land conveyed to Arnulfo Canales and Minerva Rodriguez of record in Volume 2322 Page 983 of the Official Public Records of Guadalupe County, Texas, for an angle point of the 194.56 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: S 24° 53' 06" E, along and with the northeast line of the 194.56 acre tract and the southwest line of the 5.00 acre tract, at a distance of 330.25 feet passing a found r /2" iron rod, for the southwest corner of the 5.00 acre tract and an angle point of the 194.56 acre tract and continuing into and across the 194.56 acre tract for a total distance of 350.25 feet for an interior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: Into and across the 194.56 acre tract of land, the following eight (8) courses: 1. N 64 °28118" E, a distance of 5.06 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 2. S 25 °31'42" E, a distance of 170.00 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner and a point of curvature of the tract described herein, 3. With a non - tangent curve to the right an arc length of 32.38 feet , a radius of 175.00 feet, a delta angle of 10° 36' 05" and a chord bears, S 69° 46' 20" W, a distance of 32.33 feet to a calculated point of non- tangency and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 4. S 25 °31142" E, a distance of 107.99 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 5. S 64 °28'18" W, a distance of 16.44 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 14603 Huebner Rd. Bldg 40, San Antonio, Texas 78230 • Phone: (210) 979 -8444 • Fax: (210) 979 -8441 • www.kfwengineers.com 6. S 33 °59131" W, a distance of 296.27 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 7. S 56 °00'29" E, a distance of 651.19 feet to a calculated point for a southeast exterior corner of the tract described herein, and 8. S 33° 59' 31" W, a distance of 50.25 feet to a found 1/2" iron rod, for the northeast corner of a 50.74 acre tract of land conveyed to Gerrad A. Brown of record in Volume 3135 Page 638 of the Official Public Records of Guadalupe County, Texas, for a southwest corner of the 194.56 acre tract and the southeast corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 64° 05' 52" W, along and with a southeast line of the 194.56 acre tract and the northwest line of the 50.74 acre tract, a distance of 377.66 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: Into and across the 194.56 acre tract of land, the following twenty (20) courses: 1. N 25 °54'08" W, a distance of 20.00 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 2. N 16 °10158" E, a distance of 107.24 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 3. N 31 °43156" W, a distance of 121.50 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 4. N 43 °30'02" W, a distance of 122.58 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 5. S 58 °16'04" W, a distance of 125.26 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner and a point of curvature of the tract described herein, 6. with a non - tangent curve to the left having an arc length of 110.75 feet, a radius of 125.00 feet, a delta of 50 °45151" and a chord bears N 73 °47'59 "W, a distance of 107.16 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 7. N 25 °29114" W, a distance of 125.03 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 8. S 64 °30'46" W, a distance of 290.72 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner and a point of curvature of the tract described herein, 9, with a non- tangent curve to the right having an arc length of 36.62 feet, a radius of 175.00 feet, a delta of 11 °59'28" and a chord bears N 09 °00141 "E, a distance of 36.56 feet to a calculated point for a point of tangency of the tract described herein, 14603 Huebner Rd. Bldg 40, San Antonio, Texas 78230 0 Phone: (210) 979.8444 • Fax: (210) 979 -8441 • www.kfwengineers.com 10. N 15 000125" E, a distance of 83.18 feet to a calculated point for a point of curvature of the tract described herein, 11. With a curve to the left having an arc length of 40.19 feet, a radius of 250.00 feet, a delta of 09° 12' 36" and a chord bears, N 10° 24' 07" E, a distance of 40.14 feet to a point for an interior corner and a point of non- tangency of the tract described herein, 12. N 840 12' 11" W, a distance of 50.00 feet to a calculated point for a point of curvature and an interior corner of the tract described herein, 13. With a curve to the right having an arc length of 32.15 feet, a radius of 200.00 feet, a delta of 09° 12' 36" and a chord bears, S 10° 24' 07" W, a distance of 32.11 feet to a calculated point for a point of tangency of the tract described herein, 14. S 15 °00125" W, a distance of 19.90 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, 15. N 830 47' 58" W, a distance of 137.14 feet to a point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 16. S 00 °57'16" E, a distance of 141.17 feet to a calculated point for an angle of the tract described herein, 17. S 02 040'37" E, a distance of 102.33 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 18. S 250 29' 14" E, a distance of 210.00 feet to a calculated point for an interior corner of the tract described herein, 19. N 64 30' 46" E, a distance of 44.00 feet to a calculated point for an exterior corner of the tract described herein, and 20. S 25 °29114" E, a distance of 274.63 feet to a calculated point in the northwest line of the 50.74 acre tract, in a southeast line of the 194.56 acre tract and for a exterior corner of the tract described herein; THENCE: S 64° 05' 52" W, along and with a southeast line of the 194,56 acre tract and the northwest line of the 50.74 acre tract, a distance of 364.01 feet to calculated point in the east line of Eckhardt Road, for the northwest corner of the 50.74 acre tract, the southwest corner of the 194.56 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: Along and with the east line of Eckhart Road and west line of the 194.56 acre tract, the following two (2) courses: 1. N 25 °29114" W, a distance of 1562.62 feet to a calculated point for an angle of the tract described herein, and 14603 Huebner Rd. Bldg 40, San Antonio, Texas 78230 0 Phone: (210) 979 -8444 • Fax: (210) 979 -8441 • www.k(wengineers.com 2. N 31 °48101" E, a distance of 25.80 feet to a calculated point in the southeast right -of- way line of Froboese Road, for the northwest corner of the 194.56 acre tract and the tract described herein; THENCE: N 64° 19' 55" E, along and with a northwest line of the 194.56 acre tract and the southeast right -of -way line of Froboese Road, a distance of 1360.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 39.39 acres, more or less, situated in Guadalupe County, Texas. Basis of Bearing is NAD83 Texas South Central Zone. Distances recited herein are surface distances calculated by using an average combined factor of 0.99984364551. The sole put-pose of this document is to aid in a preliminary plat submittal for The Parklands Subdivision, Unit 1 located in Guadalupe County, Texas, therefore no monumentation has been set in reference to this description. � . -- Job No.: 11 -022 Prepared by: KFW Surveying Date: November 13, 2015 Revised: February 24, 2016 File: S ADraw 2011\11-022 20160223.doc Parklands\DOCS\FN 39.39AC UNIT 1 REV 14603 Huebner Rd. Bldg 40, San Antonio, Texas 78230 • Phone: (210) 979.8444 • Fax: (210) 979.8441 • www.kfwengineers.com Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :58pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg KEY NOTES NOTES: LEGEND O 15'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SITE � ��`� O 100'EASEMENTAND R.O.W TO 1 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL I G``I tC F.LR. = �.. mtry�L FOUND 1 /2 "1RONROD O f0' R.O. W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO % ){�yr,,. SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS - SECTIONS OF t1 ¢� S.I.R. = (GS ` SET 112" IRON ROD WITH BLUE 3 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" O BIG JOHN WAY (PRIVATE ROAD) 2 O THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS G� G 60' PROPOSED R.O.W (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ (VOL. 1894. PG. 878) AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING 619 R.O.W. = A O ,r �� RIGHT -OF -WAY ® MAJOR/ MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, NOVEMBER 20, 2012 3 50 ' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER O OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ALL SAID DRAINAGE PG T G� ESMT = EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND & UTILITY EASEMENT EASEMENTS WITHIN SAID LOTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. 1 DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VOL.XXX, PG.XXX) c� -IT O.P.R. = 'NO OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS 2, SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY C'l t G.E T.TV.E. = GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, © 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND m� CABLE T.V., EASEMENT 7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BUILDING PERMITS. N P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ® VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS Q AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT p � SUCCESSORS AND / OR ASSIGNS. VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT SURVEYOR NOTES: 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. LINE AND CURVE TABLES 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS, 1. L T /ON MAP 112" DIAMETER CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL OCA N.T.S. S NOTED OTHERWISE. CORNERS UNLESS 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. GVEC NOTES: 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE 48187CO090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR 1. GVEC TO NAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. FLOODPLAIN. CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME 4. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY CYPRESS POINT, UNIT 3 OWNERS ASSOCIATION. (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER PANEL NO. 48187CO090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. OWNER.` LA SALLeE PARTNERS, GP., LLC. 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD 5. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). 303 STRATFORD, LAREDO TX 78041 BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. (PROPERTY ID# 63990) THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. { { { ( CYPRESS POINT' UNIT 4 OWNER: LA SCALE PARTNERS, GP., LLC. (VOL. 2047, PG. 670) 9. PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. 10. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION ® _ 303 STRATFORD, LAREDO 7X 78041 SCALE: 9 "= %OO' PURPOSES AND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL 15 14 13 12 PLAT. AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. ___ ®._. 0' 50' 100' 150' 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE 200' STREET. ECKHARDT ROAD N.B.U. NOTES: 2 1 1 2 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. N25 °29'14 "W 1562.62' THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENT 1S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE 10.00' N25 9'14 "W 347.20 N25 °2914 W 1110.42 OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING BLOCK I LOT 900 °29'14 "W �� L30 ti� 20' BLOCK2 LOT 900 5 °29'14 'W CLEAR VISION NOTE: LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT r- - - - - - - -N25 317.05'- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -N25 420.00'- - - - WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR 100.28' 95.77' 61.00' 60.00' S 0' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' � CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE OF VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS (E.G. STRUCTURES, WALLS, INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS ( o 25' 25' o 10 BLOCK 2 o O FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH ARE HIGHER THAN THREE (3) FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT (8) UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE 3 M w cs S ° 3 3 ° 3 3 3 �s 3 N FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. o N n v 3 0 2 v° o o I v° 2 o o Ffl fl o � 0 3 v 0 4 v a J` v° 6 N, 0 7 (ASSHTO) BLOCK I N y ° o o a ° ° d ° d o o ° o o ', , STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE 4 0 '� ° ° o ai v o 0 0 0 20 3 M o T N T a M o oN °l N UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IL ( U- I co In W co ° °o °v 1 = THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE _ I �-- - -\ 310, 5.00' co O co {/� MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND o i S �2>2 52.50' - - - v o 0300 4 /�g 5o.as' 60.00' - - ho Q ° 60.00' - - 60.00' - - - - - - - - - - - - 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' 60.00' U11 EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. a� °29'14 "W a s2 °29'14 "E SERVICE. M M fig. C58 N25 S25 893.38' • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT � v 5 1 115.49` o N o N ARROW RIDGE co YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED L v O n (50' RO.W) o G ss '14 E 612AREA. .27' N25 2914 W 150.9 S25 °29 S a G� AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS o R6 60.00' Oh 60.00' 60.00' 25.97' 125.95' y6 DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. • DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT WITH DRAINAGE co - - 111.27 5.00' U) E - 0 5.00' °0 5 0 00 - - Fz - - - % 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY (UE) ' S 3g °50'01 ? 16.32' �A? �� m° h �6 CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY ��- e2 / r 3 25` 25' 3 C52 O �h. SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. EASEMENTS (UE) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES. �o 9 w a 55.25-' 76 �/6 =2- i °o ' 6 b 20 ti • NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR 1 o o o v o o 79 0 M CITY ENGINEER IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT. a ti Lu 8 o o ° ° d d w o co z ° 3 Q� rn z o co m � a� co �° co 0 18 � THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED ° N 60.00' o r 58^ 7 50.00' 60.00' S25 °29'14 "E 6609. VSO.. o ° i7 w z 1210.00' Sp BLOCK 3 p THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT I AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE + V°� THIS PLAT OF THE HAS BEEN DAY OF 20 122.06' so.14' J BLOCKS LOT 900 23'�O a4' a4 ^o v ti "� 3' s3, SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING BY S25 °29'14 "E 274.63' U� COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES BLOCK I LOT 907 S dye p0 S °s8¢. 10 Q) APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. >, �a COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 77 DATED THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 I, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED pQ' HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE . 5 BY., �� CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, N•^ �\ EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. N BY: �W� '` SECRETARY REMAINING PORTION OF A 194.56 AC. TRACT P� THIS THE DAY OF OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. L, 6 STATE OF TEXAS Z 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 co co 2 �ji ��° COUNTY OF GUADALUPE ry LAREDO, TX 78041 O cv o �p O� 3 1, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO C� z (VOL. 2260 PG. 355) v?), ��,, d'' OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. X F HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 LAREDO, TX 78041 qj O Z w y m DAY OF A.D. AT M. AND DULY U W 3�id clj RECORDED THE DAY OF A. D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE .aI c , O Zo N, GUADALUPE COUNTY IN BOOK/VOLUME PAGE Ir BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY 2 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, APPEARED KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND U) LJC T THIS DAYOF A.D. ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS SHEET 9 BY.' DEPUTY GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF A..D. °29'14 "W N25 125.03' HE T 3 NOTARY PUBLIC GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS G� STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF ° BLOCK SHEET 4 ENGINEERS SURVEYING FIRM 19513 FIRM ' 10122300 1 TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT. L6 LOT 902 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231 (� - 8444 PHONE: FAAX: (2110) 979 9 a 8441 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER P.E. 11 C) O zo 5 SHEET 5 , KFW ENGINEERS ! FINAL SUBDIVISIONPLATESTABLISHING zo THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR 6 °0? M N43 A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM q 21.5 0' Cj 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND N31 °43'56 W NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS ° 0000 E "B " SHEET INDEX OF THE OFFICIAL RECORD L PUBLIC RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. TERESA A. SEIDEL REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 , A , O NOT TO SCALE KFW SURVEYING, LLC 0000 I�11 t 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE 101 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 FAX: 210- 979 -8441 FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 PAGE % OF 6 Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :58pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP /ahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg KEY NOTES NOTES: LEGEND O 15'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SITE � � O 100' EASEMENT AND R.O.W TO a 1 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL °' oo -t ATM°. Y ^n G .,, i„ z F.LR. = FOUND 1/2 "IRON ROD 2O 10'R. O.W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS SECTIONS OF t .f�}p� •t,�� -} 0 t. - l.t�' S.I.R. = @ SET 112" IRON ROD WITH BLUE 3 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BIG JOHN WAY PRIVATE ROAD CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" 2 31 �' THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS r,� y, �,G L 60' PROPOSED R.O.W (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ (VOL 1894. PG. 878 ) �'� c�8 AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING O A C1 R.O.W. = GD * F ✓ �� RIGHT -OF -WAY ® MAJOR/ MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, NOVEMBER 20, 2012 50' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER O 1 / Z9 62 1k OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY D DR J C9R ESMT = �P J EASEMENT O VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND 1j251FJ62 �2y y2 j 2S 1y a2 you TEL BY PROPERTY OWNERS. EASEMENTS WITHIN SAIDOOTS SHALL BI E PRIVAI `tl DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VOL/LXXX, PG XXX)NT 6� O.P.R. = OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS / / 2. SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY "'J'4 a� 5' - L' m Q G.E.TTV.E. = 6 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, O 0 °2y21 / N2 6 9 1' m / ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND CABLE T.V., EASEMENT O7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT / BL OCK 2 1 a� BUILDING PERMITS. P.U.E. = �Q PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ® VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, / LOT9OO 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS > Q AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT •�.n.,, SUCCESSORS AND / OR VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT ` ASSIGNS. DETAIL -A 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. SURVEYOR NOTES: 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR"°�W....�,.� -~' • LINE AND CURVE TABLES µ SCALE 1 " =J5O' 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS, 1 CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL BNOTED L OCA T /ON MAP N.T.S. GVEC NOTES: 2. CORNERS UNLESS OTHERWISE.ASTIC BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE ®® 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR 1. GVEC TO NAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. 13 FLOODPLAIN. CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. \ T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. 4. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ��G 9 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY P ' SEE DETAIL -A (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD 5. PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. 1�,G )$�& THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). 010 Z 'w oo° .0 \ 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF 00`� 0�* 1 /C \ THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. c�U APP P� ,,39, 1 / 78 � P G_( �0 � QCo•0 \ N2q \ 9. PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY �(� / °,3 \ 32F GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. �1Ec�S�PrC;p� 20� / 0 �P °q q8' \ a� 00 G� \ 10 PURPOSESOUAND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. OALIGNMENT IS I DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL ��01- / 24.26' PLAT. AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. /1pd�1 �� y SCALE: 1 — 100' °'sue 16 31.32'rnw �L \ 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE STREET. O N.B.U. NOTES:,,.F° nQ 1� �' g 15 z �r / �$ / Zo \ 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED EASEMENT 1S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE nOr` 2(� 2� 0' S0' 100' 150' 200` ( C` w° 6 ^�`l' \ \ Zp 6Q OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. UTILITY PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING O / o d2 / 60 oD r' �Nr 14 yy� ` / yti1 Q \ CLEAR VISION NOTE: LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT ! Gr 1110 / w Q' `'o /00 ^ 4j75 �� 17 5 \ ( o� OF OBSTRUCTIONS STRUCTURES, WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR C� p / 2g1 / 6 wo o° y0. Cg3 6.81' \ �w cS O Oi//NER: gR {AN &BETH WETZ CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE VISUAL (E.G. WALLS, FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH ARE HIGHER THAN THREE (3) FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT (8) INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS 5 pQ Q 2 / y N > ° 2 Q 13 w VJ , 0.84' N 5500 ECKHARDT RD. FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE gyd �0 yko ° o° BLOCK2 0 �y1' y NEW BRAUNFELS, TX 7$132 TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (ASSHTO) POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. , °° 0 1� 1 1R 00 rn- / yd G 9 N19 0 1 R50' 111 o ° \ �' o 6p �p (PROPERTY ID# 75446) STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE F,,�' y N > p5 52 12 `L cq o rn rn v (VOL. 908, PG. 14) UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IL ,�^°'" <J2 w o / ° � 18 r- v \0 /000 CS ^°""' O 000 6, 0 y 1 6' o 8.29' 1 < >-, w 4 O�' THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE '(g N �. % 1 �z / �w ao °. W , MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND 2 1% / 006 o Op / N06°19'09 116.84 v o W \ EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. y N� 10 80 �p�0 SERVICE. 6�0/ iZ / pyy / ao /p 13 , v ' v v 1g m o , n • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT �o 00 /Op / / / N ' O \ YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED yo No 9 / 60 / / i0 6.64' Y V ' LL a d' AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS / / 120.96' ' 8 / "W DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. � $ �,o 6060 r rn 6060 a`� 21.04' / U' -� 91 S03 °14'58 C 8 L17 \ • DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT UE WITH DRAINAGE ( ) o °° /, 3$ w °o sty 20 wo v o o 0 20 0' 6 m OUNTYROAD �, 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY g93' 1d0' �y wo 'rn, y�91E\OG� 1 ¢o, 3 O NO. 376D C9 " SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. EASEMENTS (UE) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS 6po% 8 �z 2 Cl0 UTILITIES. _ 21` / 9 / 5 N �/ 5z0�� 612Q 2F ao i1 �o n� ( o o 123.44' L18 G • NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR > 0 92 /000 Q a 0 n ' S03 °14'58 "W / 2 / 8 CITY ENGINEER IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT. 10 Sty Nrn 12 8°4850'E /1p 'T° c'° !z *' p 0 62' g06 / °o, 6� 321` 70609' / y ' a p CW9 rY 11.10' I N06°04'35 "E 1 THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED wp 13 2 / g o p0 y8 / > 121.21' AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE d j wo, o0 60• k1 1 LOCK 4 THIS PLAT OF THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 HAS BEEN DAY OF 20 / n > moo, ms's° 8 14 °0 'ssRQA� � 22 0, i LOT 900 / SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING B Y oApo y0 ao 291E I COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES 5 sty No 7 15 Nrs 5138" APPROVED BY SUCH COMM /SS /ON. 6 °��106y woo BLOCKS o- COUNTY OF GUADALUPE N� 6 0: 1s.s1' 2 o, BLOCK2 ' DATED THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 a / s , j 23 / I, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND 11, 10R 110 d6 n�>c,> 5 14.11' 2S, N BY WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE '0 5.11 / a� s h� 3g. �' ?� 4�F CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, -- — — p0° a6 7.96 4 ! 72' 1 EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND O n / 6h 1d 9.62' 24 / BY CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. yg C47 �ph�� ss77 e�a " SECRETARY THIS THE DAY OF p N �o. �� 1 'R, y�6 R Q STATE OF TEXAS J rn b a m °� 3 O �Ofl " 25 COUNTY OF GUADALUPE M C40 �FOS'w;�OS O 5 ol !'`C/ 1, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO � n h � O pa Aso yo o, 124-40' 124.40' 16 SQSh � OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. r 0y-/ n o N S12018 oy� ��Q \�y /,� HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 \, 0 �(/ LAREDO, TX 78041 W Mo �oFs DAY OF A.D. AT M. AND DULY 9p�,\��4oQ OF 2 F / M o G11 ^°^ od 40 RECORDED THE DAY OF A.D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF STATE OF TEXAS z 1, �� 6 IS!gs�s 1 q2 0 T'?y \ GUADALUPE COUNTY IN BOOK/VOLUME PAGE COUNTY OF GUADALUPE °4y,y$ ^E � � o W 1 .o o S10 � U) sQS° 39 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY 090/ Q , APPEARED KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON THIS DAYOF A.D. WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ° �° SHEET 2 ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. / s s 1 `L� s '38 � G� COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF ' 1y dd /� 37 o Q / �y s$ 80 G oo - B Y.' DEPUTY A..D. a� NOTARYPUBLIC GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS 3 � Eo 31.20' �s53, 6k6, RS° 2?9 �� °4a 36 s. c76 °EET C$1 Gd2 �9�� a� BLOCK I PO 3 so .01' i /\ '2�8 Q� 6ryI STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE �. 33 \ 35 SHEET 4 6 34 ENGINEERS + SURVEYING I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS o �° Ll FIRM 19513 FIRM ' 10122300 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 �� no BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT. �c U) ° \ N* Z ANTONIO, TX 78231 PHONE: (210) 979 - 8444 42 69' 5.80 S75 °0025" >09.2g'_ 12.78' FAX: (210) 979 - 8441 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 5 W 15778' -- — L40 KFWENGINEERS P.E. L3 4- � SHEET 5 FINAL SUBD/VlS/ONPLATESTABLISH/NG s THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 STATE OF TEXAS BLOCK 1 COUNTY OF BEXAR LOT 902 A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. l HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OF RECORD IN VOLUME 2260 PAGE 355 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. TERESA A. SEIDEL SHEET INDEX REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 KFW SURVEYING, LLC NOT TO SCALE 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE 101 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 FAX: 210- 979 -8441 FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 PAGE 2 OF 6 Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP /ahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP /ahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg KEY NOTES NOTES: LEGEND O 15'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SITE � � O 100' EASEMENT AND R.O.W TO a 1 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL °' oo -t ATM°. '� ^n G .,, i ", z F.LR. = FOUND 1/2 "IRON ROD 2O 10'R. 0.W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS SECTIONS OF t .f�yp� �t.� -} 0 - s l.t�' S.I.R. = y, @ SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH BLUE 3 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT BIG JOHN WAY PRIVATE ROAD O ( ) CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" 2 THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS �!s r,� �,G OG ` 60' PROPOSED R.O.W (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ (VOL 1894. PG. 878 ® MAJOR /MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, ) AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING pryer Q R.O.W. = G9 ✓ �� RIGHT -OF -WAY NOVEMBER 20, 2012 50' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER O OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ALL SAID DRAINAGE PG T GR ESMT = EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND & UTILITY EASEMENT (VOL.XXX, PG.XXX) HI EASEMENTS WITHIN SAID LOTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. O.P.R. = � DRAINAGE EASEMENT OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS ��t`�*'r�tt "�'4 a�� 5 G.E.TTV.E. = 6 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, O 2. SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND CABLE T.V., EASEMENT 7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BUILDING PERMITS. P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ® VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS Q AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT p � SUCCESSORS AND / OR ASSIGNS. VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT SURVEYOR NOTES: 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. LINE AND CURVE TABLES 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS, 1. L OCA T /ON MAP N.T.S. 112" DIAMETER CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. S NOTED OTHERWISE. CORNERS UNLESS GVEC NOTES: 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR 1. GVEC TO NAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. FLOODPLAIN. CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME 4. REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% no 101 OWNERS ASSOCIATION. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY _ (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. s 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD 5. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. HEET Z THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. 9. PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. / \ I SHEET , 10. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT. AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. \ / V �E T 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE it STREET. N.B.U. NOTES: SCALE: "_ %OOH / \ 8 J ��'��LLL�� JJ � 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER: BRIAN & BEH WETZ OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT 0' 50' 100' 150' 200' 5500 ECKHARDT RD. \ 78132 CLEAR VISION NOTE: WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR NEW BRAUNFELS, TX $ b� (PROPERTY ID# 75446) SHEET 4 CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE OF VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS (E.G. STRUCTURES, WALLS, FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH ARE HIGHER THAN THREE (3) FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT (8) INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE o^ �� \bo. (VOL. 908, PG. 14) \ FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND oo' °a^ TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (ASSHTO) POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. h \ STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IL Via- \ THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK ry • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS T5 MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE 40e CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND BLOCK 4 SERVICE. LOT 900 2 ho \ \ • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT N YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED / 6' \ AREA. — 3 AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS c 27.51, 's 4X24' \ DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT WITH DRAINAGE L19 �^ d� I q5 3 oti 4 � 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY • (UE) EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY 9s- � `/ S1 \sOO CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EASEMENTS WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS 46e9 8.56' Ooh \ Cp SHEET INDEX SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. (UE) �a 6 G3 L23 cw <'2]� SCALE UTILITIES. ^oo \ ��h ��09° so 43'68' 03s F °8 5 Q \ �• °O 26'Qo NOT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR / 'Qp `C o �� a- oh \ 5 CITY ENGINEER IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT O � � o o 90 \ v 4'o 6 y soon S. THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED ^ 1 AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE 1 ' ,3 2 \ 14.37 s o 7 S1 \ o y O ° THIS PLAT OF THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 HAS BEEN DAY OF 20 ? h a� 1� Q° o h y. so Z9 �° o. doo d \ ohs OWNER. BRIAN & BETH WET7 SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING BY: `V a ^ 2 \ °' TG ss° \ ti` o° s 7SL9 Os 1 O 7js oho h� Zs Aso- p s �ti g o -p N4 9 \ Fq X90 oQ\ °o- oy / 5500 ECKHARDT RD. BRAUNFELS, TX 78132 COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES 009 y3� \ NEW / yo �° l doo s Q� p RoW� �o.T. < 5 \ s a- 1 o 0. ti PROPERTY ID# 75446 COUNTY OF GUADALUPE z9 s,,, s 5 3 ti� oo 5q, c3 � 2 s s � �ti ' \ s, ( VOL. 908, PG. 14 DATED THIS DAYOF A.D. 20 I, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE h a o 6 5 y 's ^° oh o `^ 14 ^� d° s° ry ° CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, s 1.31' / 5 \ °O op °o- EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND 0 90� 5 p - 1 & ,� 1 �sQo \ ob \ CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. c0 50.60' 09'00` tio oo`' 11 \sgOO- ol5 BY.' rP's 2'd 23� %� ? S SECRETARY THIS THE DAYOF \, / �50� °�0 °0 s no G d6 b a / V �° ^tio \�� 1 STATE OF TEXAS / �` 5ti 12 s doo / 17.67' 4°0 0- 5 6 \ COUNTY OF GUADALUPE �� / R60, N ^ 7 °0 ,� r o A ` 13.54' tio' o`' tio' o` ° °BLOCK5 12 1, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO d s ° d° / 15' BLOCK4 OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 a^ <2 53� 17 so 'OO- 5�y 8 / / N35° 0'9 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE LAREDO, TX 78041 aO / 60' 0� C29 c p�' �° o° /1 1 ��. 30' IO 7.86' G1 ?$64' ao 1 00 s2 �d 10 s / °d0 � 15 / <2� y� 1� �0 DAYOF A.D. AT M. AND DULY 23,11 0° ,�0,9� "2\ / /.off c28 '� ��° dd °D 9 °� �o / Zss° �, 13 ", v �g� RECORDED THE DAY OF A.D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF STATE OF TEXAS ho tip' ti� �3° °Q moo, obs �' 1 gg. �nj CZQ� `.��Oi COUNTY OF GUADALUPE BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON as �s o\ tid 5 / s °o- J 5 S 5 5 p° 0 9 14 F h' h / i6 s9 ti moo- o� / so ° a \s° 2 sb /tip p posses �� y 17 % A N ho 00 so �9. � 8 G \ 5 26 / o m o5 ° s bo.�s o 9 �/ l s° h s> Q 0 13.25' ) �O � �'� hl P 5� go PAC O O Off`' GUADALUPE COUNTY IN BOOK/VOLUME PAGE IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS DAYOF A.D. WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND a o. ?- 0 1 I 18 �� q�9p Q 04 h5 pd °o sQ ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREON EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. w ti� g h� C33 ho. / 2 16 COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS °b'- GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAYOF A..D. o O Sa 3g 308 .1, 5ry ^d� 19 �G \ `s 53 �? w 2' 5 d o0 o sF 17 doo °° U 5� y° / 2s q8 Gi -� r S °3 SSS2?SO%1' BY. DEPUTY g, 1,196 ° 10 BOO / / / sob. y 6 5 - - ^1 \ O 41 C/2' 438, 54 q3, 20 W S o o °6 3A / / 2s, 26Q° a5 �o 6s° Cr L3 o ° ^ a o NOTARY PUBLIC GUADALUPECOUNTYTEXAS v; 24 h o sa2�9SS- / 5� �6. 00 �24ossQ- 6�° !, a0 2 \2s�Q / bs° �,?" 23 ° v' a, �?- h 2 s g0 / Zs o. F °0 ci t' �,iJ gN // o\ 22 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 5.00' 1 = 21 2 0° I 's -\ 5b / so20 5° 5 c / oti 0 U 18.12' sp P W 5000, I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF b e� oti s 1 17.02' o S33° 26so ��O ENGINEERS + SURVEYING TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS / 16.01' 50 / / 21 06 y� � O �3 \, A'Ry so o <'� °ss� �o FIRM 9513 FIRM 10122300 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 1 / tVrZ2 p2, (} V/STq l s�' / BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT BLOCK 1 G22 N0) °o LOT 902 h �� 1 S33 °ss35p R ti C ti� ( 22 31' 1 50 ao' 1 W 1T ) b 24 0 M PHONE: (ANTONIO, 2 979 - 8444 FAX: 210 979 - 8441 ( ) REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER � 0 v ° 13.06' /x � � Qe 2" P.E.', KFW ENGINEERS ,� 'o. �• 5.00' -� ` 5000'` C2> 02o ` �o_/ 4?� ti `� FINAL SUBD/VlS/ONPLATESTABLISH/NG �o 3304 b o6 17.02' 35.61' �+., THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 ^o °`� ��O• STATE OF TEXAS `-�� /� 2 N N 2 �o COUNTY OF BEXAR ( o o° o° A " o° W 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM 6 /r` �/ ^�� o A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND so o, h a 3 NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING Q SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. r 50 00' n 0 5 5° 5 �' OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS Aq , L3 0 o S33 5937 °p29 RANCH DEVELPMENT, LTD. OF RECRD IN VOLUME 2260 PAGE 355 TERESA A. SEIDEL !p oa' �� 1 cD v 6.27 so oo, 16.27' REMAINING PORTION OF A 194.56 AC. TRACT OF THE OFFICIAOL PUBLIC RECORDS OOF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. AND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 REGISTERED KEW SURVEYING, m tSC� �� / OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH I PKWYPROFESSIONAL UITE ,'� DEVELOPMENT, LTD.. L SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 StO �., 1616 CALLE DEL. NORTE #48 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 LAREDO, 7X 78041 FAX.- 210- 979 -8441 (VOL, 2260 PG. 355) FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 PAGE 3 OF 6 Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP /ahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivfllP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg KEY NOTES NOTES: LEGEND O 15'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SITE � � O a 1 100' EASEMENT AND R.O.W TO 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL °' oo -t '� ^n G .,, i ", z F.LR. = FOUND 1/2 "IRON ROD 2O 10'R. O.W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS SECTIONS OF .f�}p� �t.� -} 0 - s l.t�' S.I.R. = SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH BLUE 3 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT O 2 CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" BIG JOHN WAY PRIVATE ROAD ( ) THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS �!s r,� y, @ �,G ` 60' PROPOSED R.O.W (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ (VOL 1894. PG. 878 ) AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING OG pryer Q R.O.W. = G9 ✓ �� RIGHT -OF -WAY ® MAJOR /MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, NOVEMBER 20, 2012 \ 50' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ALL SAID DRAINAGE PG T GR ESMT = EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND & UTILITY EASEMENT HI EASEMENTS WITHIN SAID LOTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VOL.XXX, PG.XXX) O.P.R. = � OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS 2. SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ��t`�*'r�tt "�'4 a�� 5 G.E.TTV.E. = 6 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, O ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND CABLE T.V., EASEMENT 7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BUILDING PERMITS. P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ® VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS Q AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT p � SUCCESSORS AND / OR ASSIGNS. VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT SURVEYOR NOTES: 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. LINE AND CURVE TABLES 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS, 1. L T /ON MAP 112" DIAMETER CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL OCA N.T.S. CORNERS UNLESS S NOTED OTHERWISE. 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. GVEC NOTES: 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR 1. GVEC TO NAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. FLOODPLAIN. CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME 4. REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% OWNERS ASSOCIATION. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD 5. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. IF m THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. 9, PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY SCALE: 1 "= 100' GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. HEFT Z 10. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. . ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT. AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. 0' 50' 100' 150' 200' SHEET ° 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE STREET. N.B.U. NOTES: 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. HEST THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING 1 CLEAR VISION NOTE: LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE OF VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS (E.G. STRUCTURES, WALLS, FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH ARE HIGHER THAN THREE FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS (3) (8) UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE No FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (ASSHTO) POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE SHEET 4 STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IT 6 O • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE !� ` THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND r / D CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. SERVICE. • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED Ci = SHEET 5 AREA. r / AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS z DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. m 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY • DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT (UE) WITH DRAINAGE = CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY f nB�� - SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. EASEMENTS (UE) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS G / UTILITIES. � 1 / • NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR MA, / CITY ENGINEER IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT 000 cn SHEET INDEX / m NOT TO SCALE 0000 // m THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE / = THIS PLAT OF THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 9 HAS BEEN DAY OF 20 0000 m SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING BY., CD '� m COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES OWNER: GERRARD BROWN / APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. SWEETBRUSH W 1 / O DATED THIS DAYOF A.D. 20 COUNTY OF GUADALUPE SAN ANTONIO, TX 78258 SAN N (PROPERTY ID# 63992) p I, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED (VOLUME 3135, PAGE 638) o HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND BY., WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE �0 C0 p029 CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, BLOCK 1 / EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND S56 LOT 902 / CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. / BY / SECRETARY / THIS THE DAYOF / STATE OF TEXAS / COUNTY OF GUADALUPE <o / 2 REMAINING PORTION OF A 194.56 AC, TRACT 1, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. DEVELOPMENT, LTD, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 1616 CALLS DEL NORTE #48 LAREDO, TX 78041 LAREDO, TX 78041 DAY OF A.D. AT M. AND DULY (VOL. 2260 PG. 355) \ RECORDED THE DAY OF A.D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF STATE OF TEXAS �QS GUADALUPE COUNTY IN BOOK/VOLUME PAGE COUNTY OF GUADALUPE BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY \<� , IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, �69F APPEARED , KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON THIS DAYOF A.D. WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND REMAINING PORTION OF A 194.56 AC. TRACT COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH C2 N7o. 4g, DEVELOPMENT, LTD. �� 63 p4,w BY. DEPUTY GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAYOF 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 A..D. LAREDO, TX 78041 C3 L4 (VOL, 2260 PG. 355) NOTARYPUBLIC GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS 5 STATE OF TEXAS cS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE BLOCK 4 LOT 901 ENGINEERS + SURVEYING I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF q FIRM; 9513 FIRM! 110122300 TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS c� N 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT. Lo j SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231 co PHONE: (210) 979 - 8444 W FAX: (210) 979 - 8441 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER o� P.E. 00 FINAL SUBDIVISIONPLATESTABLISHING KFW ENGINEERS °' THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 STATE OF TEXAS z COUNTY OF BEXAR A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM MEE= mmm mmm mmm mmm mm= 0== mm= ubmw mmom mmmm ME== 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND MATCHLINE "C" SEE SHEET 5 OF 6 NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OF RECORD IN VOLUME 2260 PAGE 355 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. TERESA A. SEIDEL REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 KFW SURVEYING, LLC 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE 101 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 FAX: 210- 979 -8441 FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 PAGE 4 OF 6 Date: Jun 10, 2016, 4 :59pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivfllP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg Date: Jun 10, 2016, 5 :00pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg KEY NOTES NOTES: LEGEND Oi 15'PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SITE � � a O 100' EASEMENT AND R.O.W TO 1 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL °' �-o -t '� ^n G .,, i ", z F.LR. = FOUND 1/2 "IRON ROD 2O 10'R. O.W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS SECTIONS OF .f�}p� �t.� -} 0 - s l.t�' S.I.R. = SET 1/2" IRON ROD WITH BLUE 3 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT O CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" BIG JOHN WAY PRIVATE ROAD 2 ( ) THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS �!s r,� y, @ �,G ` 60' PROPOSED R.O.W (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ (VOL 1894. PG. 878 ) AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING OG pryer Q R.O.W. = G9 ✓ �� RIGHT -OF -WAY ® MAJOR /MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, NOVEMBER 20, 2012 50' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER O OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ALL SAID DRAINAGE PG T GR ESMT = EASEMENT VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND & UTILITY EASEMENT HI EASEMENTS WITHIN SAID LOTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. DRAINAGE EASEMENT (VOL.XXX, PG.XXX) O.P.R. = � OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS 2. SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ��t`�*'r�tt "�'4 a�� 5 G.E.TTV.E. = 6 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, O ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND CABLE T.V., EASEMENT 7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT BUILDING PERMITS. P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ® VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS Q AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT p � SUCCESSORS AND / OR ASSIGNS. VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT SURVEYOR NOTES: 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. LINE AND CURVE TABLES 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS, 1. L T /ON MAP 112" DIAMETER CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL OCA N.T.S. S NOTED OTHERWISE. CORNERS UNLESS 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. GVEC NOTES: 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR 1. GVEC TO NAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. FLOODPLAIN. CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME 4. REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% OWNERS ASSOCIATION. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD 5. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. MATCHLINE "C" SEE SHEET 4 OF 6 9. PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. mm ummm mmm umm omm mmm lommm OWN= no= 10. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION SCALE: > "_ 900' PURPOSES AND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT REMAINING PORTION OF A 194.56 AC. TRACT AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. d' OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE DEVELOPMENT LTD 0' 50' 100' 150' 200' STREET. N.B.U. NOTES: 1616 CALLS DEL NORTE #48 � 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. LAREDO, TX 78041 THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENT 1S THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE (VOL. 2260 PG. 355) OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING CLEAR VISION NOTE: LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT o 2�p° WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR 6 CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE OF VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS (E.G. STRUCTURES, WALLS, FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH THAN THREE FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS �0.. ARE HIGHER (3) (8) UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE F FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (ASSHTO) POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE X26 4j UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IT. p» M N24 °5737 °W 130.25' THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE co MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS N EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. SERVICE. • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT in YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED p 0 AREA. CV AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS C° DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY • DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT (UE) WITH DRAINAGE CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY ° SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. EASEMENTS (UE) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS N UTILITIES. Lo • NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR CITY ENGINEER IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT. W o M THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED ti °V co w AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE w z 00 `° � � THIS PLAT OF THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT I HAS BEEN DAY OF 20 U w k ° SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING BY: p8 ,vj 4 q COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES q d gg• 2$ BLOCK °3g LOT 901 � � u j La- APPROVED BY SUCH COMM /SS /ON. Q Nag u cr cn COUNTY OF GUADALUPE fl q DATED THIS DAY OF A.D. 20 I, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED Q c� Lu -i � U ce Lu HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND z a CI p O W u z BY. WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE o ' w � CHAIRPERSON PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, C"_ � rx j � �j EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND Q CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. ° (D BY. �z SECRETARY THIS THE DAY OF STATE OF TEXAS Lu COUNTY OF GUADALUPE I, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO ce) OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. I�T HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 N LAREDO, TX 78041 DAY OF A.D. AT M. AND DULY S12 2528.E RECORDED THE DAY OF A.D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF 13 3 STATE OF TEXAS 74' GUADALUPE COUNTY INBOOK /VOLUME PAGE COUNTY OF GUADALUPE BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, APPEARED KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON THIS DAY OF A.D. WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND �GL ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. HEST Z 2? GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF p� 5 BY.' DEPUTY A..D. ° io SHEET -- ° cn °�Xco co � uj HEST3 cP��° W Q ui � NOTARY PUBLIC GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS v j 40 � Lu Q- STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE v O Q 4 I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF % �s �� uj ENGINEERS + SURVEYING FIRM 19513 FIRM ' 10122300 TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS ShrEET 4 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT. SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231 PHONE: (210) 979 - 8444 N FAX: (210) 979 - 8441 REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 0 P.E. '�- FINAL SUBD/VlS/ONPLATESTABLISH/NG KFW ENGINEERS THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 SHEET STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR a A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND �y NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OF RECORD IN VOLUME 2260 PAGE 355 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. TERESA A. SEIDEL REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 KFW SURVEYING, LLC SHEET INDEX 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE 101 NOT TO SCALE SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 FAX .- 210- 979 -8441 FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 PAGE 5 OF 6 Date: Jun 10, 2016, 5 :00pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg LEGEND F LR. = FOUND 112" IRON ROD S.I.R. = SET 112" IRON ROD WITH BLUE TANGENT CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" R.O.W. = RIGHT -OF -WAY ESMT = EASEMENT O.P.R. = OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS G.ET.TV.E. = GAS, ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, S69 °46'20 "W CABLE T.V., EASEMENT P.U.E. = PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT GVEC NOTES: 1. GVEC TO HAVE A 5' WIDE ELECTRIC EASEMENT ON ALL ROAD CROSSINGS IN WHICH ELECTRICAL LINES ARE PLACED. 2. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT OF PARKLANDS UNIT 1 SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED BY GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC. FOR EASEMENTS. AGENT FOR GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC COOP., INC. N.B.U. NOTES: KEY NOTES O 15' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT O 10' R.O.W DEDICATION TO CITY OF SCHERTZ O 20' OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT 60' PROPOSED R.O.IN (PER CITY OF SCHERTZ ® MAJOR/ MINOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN, NOVEMBER 20, 2012 OVARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT © 16' SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT O7 VARIABLE WIDTH SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT ®VARIABLE WIDTH OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, AND PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT O9 VARIABLE WIDTH CLEAR VISION EASEMENT SURVEYOR NOTES: %Cl 10 PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT 1. 112" DIAMETER REBAR WITH A BLUE PLASTIC CAP STAMPED "KFW SURVEYING" SET AT ALL CORNERS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE STATE PLANE COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE TEXAS SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE, NORTH AMERICAN DATUM (NAD) OF 1983. 3. THE COORDINATES SHOWN HEREON ARE GRID WITH A COMBINED SCALE FACTOR OF 1.00015637894. 4. REFERENCED PROPERTY IS IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SCALED FROM FEMA FLOOD MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 7, 2007. 5. THE ELEVATIONS FOR THIS SURVEYARE BASED ON NAVD88 (GEOID09). MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE, OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT INCLUDING LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECTED TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT. OR ANY PART OF IT. • UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5 -FOOT WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND SERVICE. • UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCED AREA. • EACH TRACT IS SUBJECT TO FLOATING GUY WIRE EASEMENTS AND ITS DIMENSIONS SHALL BE DETERMINED BY THE NEED OF THE UTILITIES. • DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENT (UE) WITH DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (DE) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENTS (UE) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES. • NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR LANDSCAPING OR IRRIGATION LINES PLACED IN A LANDSCAPE EASEMENT /UTILITY EASEMENT. THIS PLAT OF THE PARKLANDS UNIT 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THE DAY OF 20 BY., NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 1, (WE) THE OWNER(S) OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT, AND DESIGNATED HEREIN AS THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, HEREBY DEDICATE FOR THE USE OF THE PUBLIC FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATER COURSES, DRAINS, EASEMENTS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. THIS THE DAYOF OWNER: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. 1616 CALLE DEL NORTE #48 LAREDO, TX 78041 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED , KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAYOF A..D. NOTARY PUBLIC GUADALUPE COUNTY TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE I THE UNDERSIGNED, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IN THE STATE OF TEXAS, HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN TO THIS PLAT. REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER , P.E. KFW ENGINEERS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYING ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND. TERESA A. SEIDEL REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NO. 5672 KFW SURVEYING, LLC 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE 101 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78231 PHONE: 210- 979 -8444 FAX: 210- 979 -8441 FIRM LICENSE NO. 10122300 1 100' EASEMENT AND R.O.W TO CITY PUBLIC SERVICE BOARD OF SAN ANTONIO JANUARY 18, 1978. OBIG JOHN WAY (PRIVATE ROAD) (VOL. 1894. PG. 878) 3 50' OPEN SPACE, DRAINAGE, SEWER O & UTILITY EASEMENT (VOL.XXX, PG.XXX) SEE SHEET 6 OF 6 FOR LINE AND CURVE TABLES CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA CHORD CHORD BEARING C1 32.38' 175.00' 16.24' 10 °36'05" 32.33' S69 °46'20 "W C2 59.07' 75.00' 31.16' 45 °07'25" 57.55' N33 °2647 "W C3 83.06' 325.00' 41.76' 14 °3838" 82.84' N18 °12'23 "W C4 56.19' 50.00' 31.48' 64 °2328" 53.28' S64 °4459 "W C5 110.75' 125.00' 59.31' 50 °4551" 107.16' N73 °4759 "W C6 36.62' 175.00' 18.38' 11'59 28 " 3656' N9 °00'41 "E C7 144.15' 841.00' 72.25' 9 °49'14" 143.97' S84 °1551 "W C8 22.56' 15.00' 14.03' 86 °10'12" 20.49' N46 °05'22 "E C9 4.94' 125.00' 2.47' 2 °15'59" 4.94' S4 °08'16 "W CIO 39.66' 75.00' 20.30' 30 °17'42" 39.20' S18 °09'07 'W C11 23.16' 15.00' 14.61' 88 °28'20" 20.93' S41 °13'54 "E C12 207.74' 841.00' 104.40' 14 °09'10" 207.21' N78 °2328 "W C13 22.93' 15.00' 14.38' 87 °34'05" 20.76' N64 °54'04 "E C14 207.42' 275.00' 108.92' 43 °12'53" 202.53' S42 °43'28 "W C15 10.20' 15.00' 5.31' 38 °5822" 10.01' N44 °50'44 "E C16 147.24' 50.00' 506.69' 168 °4343" 99.52' N70 °16'36 "W C17 10.20' 15.00' 5.31' 38 °5822" 10.01' S5 °23'55 "E C18 197.75' 125.00' 126.41' 90 °3836" 177.77' S70 °12'24 "E C19 53.03' 175.00' 1 26.72' 17 °2146" 52.83' N83 °45'16 "E C20 18AT 15.00' 10.61' 70 °3246" 17.32' S57 °09'46 "W C21 68.65' 325.00' 34.45' 12 °06'08" 68.52' N27 °5627 "E C22 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' S11 °00'29 'E C23 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' N78 °59'31 "E C24 47.41' 275.00' 23.76' 9 °5240" 47.35' N29 °03'11 "E C25 22.81' 15.00' 14.26' 87 °06'59" 20.67' N19 °2639 "W C26 116.42' 175.00' 60.46' 38 °07'02" 114.29' S43 °5637 "E C27 23.77' 15.00' 15.21' 90 °4659" 21.36' N70 °16'36 "W C28 36.57' 225.00' 18.32' 9 °18'42" 36.53' S59 °40'34 "W C29 15.12' 15.00' 8.28' 57 °46'09" 14.49' S26 °08'09 "W C30 309.49' 60.00' 37.83' 1 295 °32'17" 64.00' S34 05847 "E C31 15.12' 15.00' 8.28' 57 °46'09" 14.49' N83 °54'17 "E C32 44.69' 275.00' 22.40' 9 01842" 44.64' S59 °40'34 "W C33 23.36' 15.00' 14.80' 89 °13'01" 21.07' N19 °4324 "E C34 39.61' 25.00' 25.34' 90 °4659" 35.60' N70 °16'36 "W C35 169.70' 225.00' 89.12' 43 °12'53" 16571' S42 °4328 "W C36 22.80' 15.00' 14.25' 87 °04'31" 20.66' S22 °25'14 "E C37 146.05' 841.00' 73.21' 9 °57'00" 145.86' N60 °5859 "W C38 23.61' 15.00' 15.05' 90 °11'36" 21.25' S78 °5343 "W C39 44.85' 225.00' 22.50' 11 °25'19" 44.78' N39 °30'35 "E C40 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' SO °13'14 "W CURVE TABLE CURVE LENGTH RADIUS TANGENT DELTA CHORD CHORD BEARING C41 16.97' 15.00' 9.52' 64 °49'21" 16.08' S61 °13'03 "E C42 137.43' 50.00' 251.19' 157 °29'05" 98.08' N14 °53'11 "W C43 16.97' 15.00' 9.52' 64 °49'21" 16.08' S31 °2641 "W C44 173.84' 200.00' 92.84' 49 °48'05" 168.42' N19 °06'13 "W C45 19.22' 15.00' 11.18' 73 °2354" 17.93' N81 °2843 'W C46 320.26' 125.00' 41916' 146 °4749" 239,58' S44 °4646 "E C47 19.22' 15.00' 11.18' 73 °2354" 17.93' N8 °04'49 "W C48 128.19' 175.00' 67.13' 41'58'16" 125.35' N65 °45'54 "W C49 67.93' 245.00' 34.19' 15 °53'12" 67.71' S85 °18'23 "W C50 44.88' 25.00' 31.35' 102 °51'01" 39.09' S25 °56'16 "W C51 20.07' 15.00' 11.86' 76 °3927" 18.61' S63 °4858 "E C52 133.79' 50.00' 210.82' 153 °18'55" 97.30' N25 °29'14 "W C53 20.07' 15.00' 11.86' 76 °3927" 18.61' S12 °50'30 "W C54 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' S70 °29'14 "E C55 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' S19 °30'46 "W C56 20.34' 15.00' 12.08' 77 °40'56" 18.81' S64 °19'42 "E C57 302.75' 60.00' 42.71' 289 °06'22" 69.59' N41 °23'01 'E C58 8.23' 15.00' 4.22' 31'2526" 8.12' N9 °46'31 "W C59 1 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' N70 °29'14 "W C62 23.56' 15.00' 15.00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' N19 °30'46 "E C63 152.15' 50.00' 1012.77' 174 020'50" 99.88' S22 °31'32 "W C64 9.13' 15.00' 4.71' 34 °53'04" 8.99' S87 °4435 "E C65 94.92' 295.00' 47.87' 18 °26'05" 94.51' S84 °01'56 "W C66 164.82' 225.00' 86.30' 41 058'16" 161.16' N65 °4554 "W C67 23.56' 15.00' 15,00' 90 °00'00" 21.21' S89 °4646 "E C68 34.23' 175.00' 17.17' 11 °12'20" 34.17' N39 037'04 "E C69 24.28' 15.00' 15.74' 92 °45'41" 21.72' N12 °21'56 "W C70 742.41' 781.00' 401.94' 54 °2754" 714.78' N85 °5844 "W C71 34.51' 15.00' 33.54' 131 °4837" 27.39' N21 °0733 "E C72 126.16' 75.00' 83.85' 96 °2246" 111.80' S44 °4646 "E C73 34.51' 15.00' 33.54' 131'4837" 27.39' S69 °18'56 "W C74 10.25' 15.00' 5.34' 39 °09'39" 10.05' N45 °04'04 "W C76 29.51' 250.00' 14.77' 6 °4548" 29.49' N2 °24'55 "E C77 69.70' 250.00' 35.08' 15 °5824" 69.47' N36 °4734 'W C78 32.21' 20.00' 20.81' 92 °1634" 28.84' S20 °39'03 "W C79 555.26' 761.00' 290.64' 41'48'19" 543.02' S88 °06'07 "W C80 32.15' 200.00' 1611' 9 °12'36" 32.1V S10 °24'07 "W C81 40.19' 250.00' 20.14' 9 °12'36" 40.14' N10 °24'07 "E LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Ll 5.06' N64 °28'18 "E L2 16.44' S64 °28'18 "W L4 39.90' N25 °31'42 "W L5 57.79' N70 °17'56 "W L6 8.12' N25 °38'14 "W L7 26.31' S11 °17'12 "W L8 30.90' N56 °00'29 "W L10 50.25' S33 °59'31 'W L11 20,00' N25 °54'08 "W L12 44.00' N64 °30'46 "E L13 25.80' N31 °48'01 "E L14 50.00' N84 °12'11 "IN L15 48.19' N44 °14'49 "E L16 49.51' N57 °3528 "E L17 43.74' S3 °00'16 'W L18 42.13' N3 °00'16 "E L19 24.15' S21 °07'02 "W L21 31.22' N55 °01'13 "E L22 31.22' N55 °01'13 "E L23 24.49' N21 °07'02 "E LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L24 81.32' N25 029'14 "W L27 26.65' N64 °30'46 "E L28 18.03' N81 °47'50 "W L29 18.03' S30 °4922 "W L30 70.00' N25 °29'14 "W L31 41.36' N25 °29'14 "W L32 19.90' S15 °00'25 "W L33 25.75' N69 °3846 "W L34 8.19' N76 °43'08 "E L35 43.80' S78 °5931 "W L36 22.63' S56 °00'29 "E L37 21.21' S78 °5931 "W L38 15.01' N31 °47'07 "E L39 21.09' N31 °47'07 "E L40 10.21' N76 °43'08 "E NOTES: 1. NO STRUCTURE, FENCES, WALLS OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS THAT IMPEDE DRAINAGE SHALL BE PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. NO LANDSCAPING OR OTHER TYPE OF MODIFICATIONS, WHICH ALTER THE CROSS - SECTIONS OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS, AS APPROVED, SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHOUT THE APPROVAL OF THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS. THE CITY OF SCHERTZ SHALL HAVE THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER GRANTOR'S ADJACENT PROPERTY TO REMOVE ANY IMPEDING OBSTRUCT IONS PLACED WITHIN THE LIMITS OF SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS AND TO MAKE ANY MODIFICATIONS OR IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. ALL SAID DRAINAGE EASEMENTS WITHIN SAID LOTS SHALL BE PRIVATELY MAINTAINED BY PROPERTY OWNERS. 2. SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCE AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND BUILDING PERMITS. 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND / OR ASSIGNS. 4. TWO POINTS OF ACCESS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ALL TIMES. 5. THIS PLAT CONSISTS OF 113 BUILDABLE LOTS, 62 "SF 60" LOTS AND 51 "SF 50" LOTS 6. ACCORDING TO FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP 90 OF 480, COMMUNITY PANEL NO. 48187C0090F, DATED NOVEMBER 2, 2007. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YR FLOODPLAIN. T LANDSCAPE AND WALL EASEMENTS WILL BE MAINTAINED AND IRRIGATED BY THE HOME OWNERS ASSOCIATION. 8. LOT 1, BLOCK 8; LOT 1, BLOCK 9; LOT 1, BLOCK 10; LOT 1, BLOCK 11; LOT 1, BLOCK 12; LOT 1, BLOCK 13; LOT 1, BLOCK 14; LOT 1, BLOCK 15; LOT 1, BLOCK 16 ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER OR ITS SUCCESSORS AND /OR ASSIGNS. 9. PROPERTY BEING PLATTED IS CURRENTLY ZONED PDD. 10. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES AND DO NOT SET THE ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT TIME OF FINAL PLAT. 11. ALL LOTS ARE TO BE UTILITY SERVICED FROM THE FRONT OF THE LOTS ADJACENT TO THE STREET. 12. WALL MAINTENANCE EASEMENT WILL BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION. THE PLACEMENT OF OBSTRUCTIONS, FENCES AND /OR PERMANENT STRUCTURES BY THE LOT OWNER SHALL BE PROHIBITED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT. CLEAR VISION NOTE: CLEAR VISION EASEMENTS MUST BE FREE OF VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS (E.G. STRUCTURES, WALLS, FENCES, AND VEGETATION), WHICH ARE HIGHER THAN THREE (3) FEET AND LOWER THAN EIGHT (8) FEET ABOVE THE PAVEMENT AS PER THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF STATE HIGHWAY AND TRANSPORTATION OFFICIALS (ASSHTO) POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS, OR LATEST REVISION THEREOF. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNCIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CITY ENGINEER THIS PLAT OF THE THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT I HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. DATED THIS DAYOF A.D. 20 BY.• CHAIRPERSON BY: SECRETARY STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 1, COUNTY CLERK OF SAID COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN MY OFFICE, ON THE DAY OF A.D. AT M. AND DULY RECORDED THE DAYOF A.D. AT M. IN THE RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY IN BOOK/VOLUME PAGE IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL OF OFFICE, THIS DAY OF A.D. COUNTY CLERK, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS BY: DEPUTY l7w ENGINEERS + SURVEYING FIRM 9513 FIRM 10122300 3421 PAESANOS PKWY., SUITE. 200 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78231 PHONE: (210) 979 - 8444 FAX: (210) 979 - 8441 FINAL SUBD /VlS /ON PLA T ESTABLISH /NG THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNIT 1 A 47.50 ACRE TRACT OF LAND, OUT OF THE JOHN NOYES SURVEY NO. 259, ABSTRACT NO. 253, AND THE CARROL M. GAHOGAN, JR. SURVEY NO. 25, ABSTRACT NO. 142, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS AND BEING OUT OF A 194.56 ACRE TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED TO ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT, LTD. OF RECORD IN VOLUME 2260 PAGE 355 OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. Date: Jun 10, 2016, 5:00pm User ID: sreyes File: P: 11711231011DesigniCivillP lahPL1712301- FINAL,dwg PAGE 6 OF 6 • C KFW ECKHARDT RD PHASE 1A STREETS ENGINEERS, SURVEYM OPINION OF PROBABLE COST UNITS: DATE: 20- Nov -17 NO. OF LOTS: N/A STATUS OF DESIGN: Approved ACREAGE: N/A SOURCE OF UNIT PRICES: Contractor Bid DENSITY: DATE OBTAINED: 21- Jun -17 ENGINEERING 28. COMPLETE TXDOT PERMITTING EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 SUBTOTAL $3,500.00 TOTAL: $276,102.50 COLLECTOR: 327 LINEAR FT FULL SECTION (STA. 1 +22.58 TO STA. 4 +50.00) 459 LINEAR FT HALF SECTION (STA. 4 +50.00 TO STA.9 +09.80) DESCRIPTION UNIT CITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT MISC. IMPROVEMENTS 1. MOBILIZATION LS 1 $7,500.00 $7,500.00 2. SIILT FENCE LF 960 $1.90 $1,824.00 3. RE- VEGETATION LF 960 $0.60 $576.00 4. 5' SIDEWALK LF 963 $27.30 $26,289.90 5. PREP ROW LS 1 $4,000.00 $4,000.00 6. SIGNAGE EA 1 $215.00 $215.00 7. RELOCATE BARB WIRE FENCE (APPROX. 1400 LF) LF 255 $1.00 $255.00 8. BARRICADES LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 9A. 14' ARMOR CURB WITH RIP RAP LF 25 $484.00 $12,100.00 9B. CONCRETE RIP RAP SY 30 $90.00 $2,700.00 10. CHANNEL GRADING LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 SUBTOTAL $68,459.90 ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 11. REMOVE ASHALPT SY 1,687 $20.50 $34,583.50 12. EXCAVATION CY 2,632 $1.50 $3,948.00 13. PREP PAVEMENT SUBGRADE SY 2,778 $1.00 $2,778.00 14. HAUL AND EMBANK EXCESS AT PARKLANDS CY 2,632 $5.50 $14,476.00 15. TRIAX TX5 GEOGRID SY 2,778 $3.20 $8,889.60 16. 19.0" FLEX BASE SY 2,778 $15.50 $43,059.00 17. 3" HMAC, TYPE D SY 2,778 $13.50 $37,503.00 18. 7" CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER LF 1,113 $13.00 $14,469.00 SUBTOTAL $159,706.10 ALT. WATER IMPROVEMENTS 19. 12" PVC (C900) WATER PIPE LF 504 $39.00 $19,656.00 20. CAST IRON FITTING TON 1 $10,600.00 $5,300.00 21. 2" TEMPORARY BLOWOFF EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 22. HYDROSTATIC TESTING EA 1 $2,100.00 $2,100.00 23. CHLORINATION LF 504 $0.50 $252.00 24. WATER TIE -IN EA 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 25. TRENCH PROTECTION LF 504 $1.00 $504.00 26. FIRE HYDRANT 1 1 $3,975.00 $3,975.00 27. METER BOX EA 2 $188.00 $376.00 28. NEW 3/4" WATER SERVICE (SOUTH SIDE OF EA 1 $428.50 $428.50 SUBTOTAL $37,391.50 WATER SERVICE ACROSS ECKHARDT RD 23. 3/4" WATER SERVICE (WITH FLOW FILL) EA 1 $4,100.00 $4,100.00 24. 3" HMAC TYPE D (ASHPHALT PATH WITH ATB)(47SY) LS 1 $1,800.00 $1,800.00 25. 7" CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 20 $13.00 $260.00 26. T CONCRETE SIDEWALK LF 20 $19.25 $385.00 27. REMOVE ASPHALT AND CURB LS 1 $500.00 $500.00 SUBTOTAL $7,045.00 ENGINEERING 28. COMPLETE TXDOT PERMITTING EA 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 SUBTOTAL $3,500.00 TOTAL: $276,102.50 Exhibit C IRREVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Securing Subdivider's Performance of Development- Related Obligations. This Irrevocable Trust Agreement is entered into among Subdivider, Trustee, and City as of the effective date stated below. Subdivider: Subdivider's Address: Trustee Name: Trustee's Texas address: Trustee's Phone Number: City: City of Schertz City's Address: 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, TX 75154 Attention: City Manager Irrevocable Trust Amount: Irrevocable Trust Account Number: Subdivision Name: County: Guadalupe 1. This is an Irrevocable Trust Agreement Securing Subdivider's Performance of Development- Related Obligations under: (a) Sec. 21.4.15 (entitled "Public Infrastructure Improvements, Construction Plans, and Improvement Agreements) of the Unified Development Code of the City of Schertz, Texas; and (b) Sec. 12.12. 10 (entitled "Final Plat Process ") of the Unified Development Code of the City of Schertz, Texas; and (c) the Terms and Conditions of Subdivider Irrevocable Trust Agreements ( "Terms and Conditions ") as attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated into this Agreement for all purposes as if fully set forth herein. 2. Subdivider and Trustee each acknowledge receipt of the Terms and Conditions of this Subdivider Irrevocable Trust Agreements. 3. Trustee affirms and warrants that Trustee is a Trust Company organized under Texas Finance Code, Title 3 (entitled "Financial Institutions and Businesses "), Subtitle F (entitled "Trust Companies ") and is empowered by the authority, and meets the financial requirements, of Title 3, Subtitle F to enter into this City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 1 Agreement. 4. Subdivider has delivered to Trustee the Irrevocable Trust Amount in immediately available funds and U.S. currency. Trustee acknowledges receipt of the Irrevocable Trust Amount in immediately available funds and U.S. currency and accepts the obligations of this Irrevocable Trust as set out in the Terms and Conditions of Subdivider Irrevocable Trust Agreements contained in Exhibit "A ". In Witness Whereof, the parties have caused their representatives to set their hands to be effective as of the following effective date: City of Schertz, Subdivider, a Texas municipal corporation By: By: Printed Name: Printed Name: Title: Title: Trustee, a "Trust Institution" as defined by the Texas Finance Code, Title 3. Financial Institutions and Businesses, Subtitle F M. Printed Name: Title: City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 2 rx.qff MUM 1. Scope of Terms and Conditions. These terms and conditions govern this Irrevocable Trust Agreement Securing Subdivider's Performance of Development - Related Obligations that are entered into as required under Sec. 21.4.15 (entitled "Public Infrastructure Improvements, Construction Plans, and Improvement Agreements) of the Unified Development Code of the City of Schertz, Texas, including, but not limited to: 1.01 The requirement that prior to the recordation of any approved subdivision plat, the Subdivider must file with the City this Irrevocable Trust Agreement in an amount equal to 125% of the cost estimate of constructing the required improvements, as approved by the City Engineer, guaranteeing to the City that all such improvements shall be constructed and completed in a satisfactory manner and within a period of I year after the date of plat recordation. 2. Subdivider Undertaking. Subdivider pledges to City to fulfill its infrastructure- related obligations arising from the Subdivision independently of this Irrevocable Trust. This Trust is merely intended to secure Subdivider's obligations, not replace or satisfy them. 3. Irrevocable Trust, Withdrawals. Trustee must hold the Irrevocable Trust Amount in trust for City to secure Subdivider's infrastructure - related obligations arising from the Subdivision. All withdrawals must be approved by the City Engineer, and may be withdrawn as follows: By Subdivider: Subdivider may withdraw from the Irrevocable Trust Amount when 50% or more of the remaining cost estimate has been completed and approved in writing by the City Engineer. The City Engineer shall not approve any withdrawal until subdivider delivers an engineer's certification, from a licensed engineer in the state of Texas, attesting to the accuracy of the dollar amounts of the construction cost of the remaining improvements. Subdivider may not withdraw more than four times (not to include a one -time substitution approved by the City Engineer upon the granting of a time extension) during the life of the irrevocable trust. In no event shall the amount of the trust be less than twenty (20) percent of the total amount of the original cost estimate until all improvements have been completed and approved. To make a withdrawal, Subdivider must deliver to Trustee a Draw Request Form signed by the Subdivider and the City Engineer acknowledging completion of some or all of City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 3 Subdivider's infrastructure- related obligations. Draw Request Forms shall be substantially in the same form as Appendix I hereto {entitled "IRREVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT DRAW REQUEST FORM: (SUBDIVIDER)" }. Developer's and City's acknowledgment must state the dollar value of the completed infrastructure - related obligations. By City: City may withdraw from the Irrevocable Trust Amount to complete Subdivider's infrastructure- related obligations if Subdivider has failed to timely fulfill those obligations. Trustee must honor any attempted draw by the City if the draw is in writing and represents to the Trustee that Developer has failed or refused, or anticipatorily breached its obligation, to timely complete its infrastructure- related obligations arising from the Subdivision. City may withdraw as much as is reasonably necessary to fulfill Subdivider's infrastructure- related obligations arising from the Subdivision. City may make multiple draws. Draw Request Forms shall be substantially in the same form as Appendix I hereto [entitled "IRREVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENT DRAW REQUEST FORM (CITY) "]. 4. Accounting by City. If City withdraws any part of the Irrevocable Trust Amount, within 60 days of completing Subdivider's infrastructure - related obligations arising from the Subdivision, City must deliver to Subdivider an accounting of the money spent. Subdivider acknowledges that the statutory formalities applicable to contracting by City may make the City's cost of completion higher than that Subdivider would have incurred had it completed the work itself. 5. Federal Deposit Insurance. Trustee must keep the Irrevocable Trust Amount in an interest - bearing account or accounts at federally- insured commercial bank or banks. Trustee must spread the Trust Amount over as many different institutions as necessary to assure the entire Irrevocable Trust Amount is covered by federal deposit insurance. 6. Termination of Irrevocable Trust. This Irrevocable Trust Agreement terminates only when the City delivers a written release of Trust to Trustee, with a copy to Subdivider. City has 30 days after the City's acceptance of the infrastructure improvements in which to deliver a written release of the Trust. If City fails to do so timely, Subdivider may sue for a release of the Irrevocable Trust. 7. Interpleader. If Trustee is joined as a party to a lawsuit arising out of this Irrevocable Trust, Trustee may interplead the funds remaining in Trust with any court of competent jurisdiction in Guadalupe County, Texas. City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 4 Upon so doing, Trustee is absolved of liability both to City and to Subdivider for all sums interpleaded and for all sums previously paid to City under this Agreement. Upon depositing the funds into the court registry pursuant to an interpleader, Trustee is entitled to recover from the sums deposited its reasonable and necessary attorneys fees actually incurred in making the interpleader. 8. Integration. Subdivider may contract separately with Trustee regarding all aspects of this trust relationship not covered by this agreement, including Trustee's fees and any indemnity Trustee may wish to be provided, but no such agreements may contradict this Agreement or impair the City's rights under it. This Agreement is a fully integrated statement of City's rights as to Trustee and Subdivider. There are no oral or other written agreements to which City is a party governing the terms of this irrevocable trust. Without limiting the generality of the above, City need not pay any fee to Trustee, and City cannot lawfully, and will not, indemnify Trustee in any respect. 9. Public Information. All parties acknowledge that this instrument is public information within the meaning of Chapter 552 of the Texas Government Code and accordingly may be disclosed to the public. Nothing in this agreement waives an otherwise applicable exception to disclosure. 10. Prohibited Interests in Contracts. 10.1. The Charter of the City of Schertz, Section 1.2.01 prohibits City Council members or a City Official from violating the rules and regulations regarding conflicts of interests as set out in the Texas Local Government Code, Chapter 171. 10.2. Subdivider and Trustee each warrant and certify as follows: They and their respective officers, employees and agents are neither officials nor employees of the City, nor are they related to any City Council member or City Official within the first degree of consanguinity or affinity. 10.3. Subdivider and Trustee acknowledge that City's reliance on the above warranties and certifications is reasonable. City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 5 APPENDIX I TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUBDIVIDER IRREVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENTS Date: l I Subdivider's Name: Address: Phone Number: Trustees' Name: Escrow Total (Start of Trust): Escrow Total (Current): 20% Reserve Amount: Total Request for this Draw: Totals/Amounts Previous Draw Request I hereby certify that all the information stated herein is true and accurate, and is based on construction costs bearing the signature and seal of a licensed engineer in the state of Texas (original cost estimate and cost estimate for remaining work attached). This draw request is submitted for reimbursement of funds. All completed work has been done in accordance with the approved construction plans and City standards and procedures. I understand that I cannot obtain additional monies from the trust escrow account without the approval of the City Engineer, and that approval of any work completed does not constitute acceptance of any improvements. I also understand that a 20% reserve based on the original certified estimate will not be released until all work is complete and approved by the City Engineer. City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 6 Subdivider's Signature: Print Name: Title: Date: Before me, a notary public for the State of Texas, personally appeared known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing document and, being by me first duly sworn, declared that the statements therein contained are true and correct on this the day of 2017. (Personalized Seal) Notary Public's Signature The property that is the subject of this trust escrow account was inspected on (date). The draw amount is acceptable and approved. City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 7 APPENDIX I TO TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF SUBDIVIDER IRREVOCABLE TRUST AGREEMENTS Date: Subdivider's Name: Address: Phone Number: Trustees' Name: Address: Phone Number: Escrow Total (Start of Trust): Escrow Total (Current): 20% Reserve Amount: Total Request for this Draw: Subdivision Name Construction Item Previous Draw Totals/Amounts Request for this Draw This draw request is submitted to Trustee for release of funds associated with the plat number indicated above. The subdivider named above has failed, refused, or anticipatorily breached its obligation to timely complete its infrastructure related obligations arising from the subdivision of the plat identified above. City of Schertz Irrevocable Trust Agreement Page 8 Agenda No. 8 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Planning & Community Development Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -105 — Consideration and/or action approving a resolution authorizing a Parkland Improvement Agreement with Rolling Hills Ranch Ltd., related to public parkland dedication and improvements for The Parklands Subdivision Units 1 and 2. In September 2013, City Council approved a Planned Development District (PDD) rezone for The Parklands development, generally located at the intersection of Froboese Lane and Eckhardt :Road. The Parklands development is a single family residential development consisting of 505 planned single family home lots divided into 4 units. The development also includes a school site and an approximately 5 acre public park that is within Unit 3. The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a preliminary plat for The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 on May 11, 2016 and approved the final plat on October 12, 2016. In order to record the plat, the property owner must meet the parkland dedication and improvement requirements, pay a fee in lieu, or enter into an Improvement Agreement. Goal The property owner is requesting an improvement agreement to defer dedication and improvements to public parkland in The Parklands Subdivision to future Unit 3. Access and public infrastructure improvements surrounding the public parkland are being provided with Unit 3 of the subdivision. Community Benefit It is the City's desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City's vision of future growth. This Improvement Agreement will allow the developer to defer the dedication and improvements of the public park within the subdivision to Unit 3 and also requires all park improvements and dedication to be completed with Unit 3 of the subdivision. City Council Memorandum Page 2 Summary of Recommended Action The Planning and Community Development Department and Parks, Recreation and Community Service Department met with representatives of the property owner several times to discuss improvements to the parkland. As a result of those meetings, both staff and the owner are in agreement that the park amenities will include a playscape, pavilion, sports court, playing field with goals and a 10' perimeter walkway. These items are depicted in Exhibit C of the attached Parkland Improvement Agreement. Because the road access and utility improvements surrounding the parkland will not be constructed until unit 3 of the planned subdivision, the property owner is requesting a Parkland Improvement Agreement to defer parkland dedication and improvements to Unit 3. If approved, the agreement will require the property owner to post a fiscal surety to secure the parkland improvements for each unit I and 2. The property owner would then construct all parkland improvements with unit 3 and dedicate the improved parkland with the recording of the unit 3 final plat. This agreement is beneficial to both the property owner and the City. The property owner would be able to plat units 1 and 2 and then start home construction and the City would receive 5 acres of improved parkland with unit 3 which would be approximately halfway through the build out of the development. FISCAL IMPACT None RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 17 -R -105. ATTACHMENT Resolution No. 17 -R -1.05 RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -105 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A PARKLAND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISION UNITS 1 AND 2, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Landowner desires to defer public parkland dedication and improvement obligation for The Parklands Subdivision Units 1 and 2 to a future phase of the master planned Parklands Subdivision development; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21.9.10.17 of the City's Unified Development Code, the obligation to dedicate parkland and construct park improvements for the Subdivision may be deferred if an Improvement Agreement is executed and if sufficient surety is provided to secure the obligation to construct the park improvements; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz has recommended that the City enter into a Parkland Improvement Agreement and acceptance of the parkland upon completion of the improvements; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve the Parkland Improvement Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A; BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute the Parkland Improvement Agreement in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A attached hereto and upon completion of the improvements, accept the land shown on Exhibit B. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All resolutions or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council . hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 2017. Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (SEAL OF THE CITY) After Recording, Please Return To: Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal Hyde & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: T. Daniel Santee STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE PARKLAND IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVSION UNITS 1 & 2 This Parkland Improvement Agreement (hereinafter referred to as "Agreement ") is entered into by and between Rolling Hills Ranch Development, LTD, (hereinafter referred to as the "Developer ") and the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas Municipal Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "City "), and is effective upon the execution of this Agreement by the Developer and the City (the `Effective Date "). WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of that certain real property located in the City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas, more specifically described on Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof for all purposes (the "Propert y" or "The Parklands Subdivision "); WHEREAS, the Developer seeks to develop a residential subdivision on the Property (the "Subdivision ") that requires the dedication and construction of public parkland and improvements; and WHEREAS, this Agreement is made solely with respect to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 and The Parklands Subdivision Unit 2; WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21.9.10.17 of the City's Unified Development Code, the obligation to dedicate parkland and construct park improvements for the Subdivision may be deferred if an Improvement Agreement is executed and if sufficient surety is provided to secure the obligation to construct the park improvements; and NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the agreements set forth herein and for other reciprocal good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged and stipulated by the parties, the Developer and the City, agree as follows: Ioi'iiTiirm 1.1 The Parklands Subdivision — the subdivision currently being developed by Developer described on Exhibit "A" and identified on The Parklands Subdivision Master Development Plan (Exhibit `B "), which subdivision may be platted through several individual Plats pertaining to distinct portions of The Parklands Subdivision. 1.2 The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1 — the area identified on The Parklands Subdivision Master Development Plan (Exhibit "B ") as Unit 1, which consists of a maximum of 113 buildable residential lots. 1.3 The Parklands Subdivision Unit 2 — the area identified on The Parklands Subdivision Master Development Plan (Exhibit `B ") as Unit 2, which consists of a maximum of 150 buildable residential lots. 1.4 Parkland — the area identified on The Parklands Subdivision Master Development Plan (Exhibit `B ") as park and the deed on Exhibit `B" attach hereto as "Parkland ". 1.5 Park Improvements — those certain improvements described on Exhibit "C" and to be constructed by Developer. 1.6 Phased Value of Improvements — the dollar value of the Park Improvements assigned to each Subdivision Unit as shown on Exhibit "D ". 2. Construction of Improvements; Covenants. The Developer and the City covenant and agree to the following: 2.1 The Developer shall cause the completion of the Park Improvements prior to the recordation of The :Parklands Subdivision Unit 3; and 2.2 The Developer shall cause such changes to the Park Improvements as may be required by the City for approval and acceptance of the Park Improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications; and 2.3 The Developer shall Deed to the City, Parkland as described in Exhibit `B "; and 2.4 The Developer shall warranty the Park Improvements for a period of two (2) years following acceptance by the City. A warranty bond shall be provided in the amount of 20% of the costs of the Park Improvements for such period. 2.5 Prior to the recording of The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, the Developer shall provide (or cause to be provided) a surety to the City in accordance with Unified Development Code Section 21.4.15.G, in the amount equal to one hundred thirty seven thousand seven hundred seventy five dollars and ninety four cents ($1.37,775.94) in order to secure Developer's satisfaction of the requirements in Sections 2.1 -2.3 above with respect to such incomplete Park Improvements related to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1. 2.6 Prior to the recording of The Parklands Subdivision Unit 2, the Developer shall provide (or cause to be provided) a surety to the City in accordance with Unified Development Code Section 21.4.1.5.G, in the amount equal to one hundred eighty three thousand seven hundred one dollars and twenty five cents ($ 183,701.25) in order to secure Developer's satisfaction of the requirements in Sections 2.1 -2.3 above with respect to such incomplete Park Improvements related to The Parklands Subdivision Unit 2. 2.7 Both parties agree that Exhibit "D ", depending on the Phase or Unit (as such terms are described in Exhibit D), may over compensate or under compensate the Fee Credit ($650 per lot) for that particular Phase, but the total for all Phases, equals to the value of the Total Fee Credits for all Units and therefore fully satisfy the Total Park Fees for the Parklands. Any future revision by the City of the City's Parkland Dedication Fee or parkland dedication requirements in the UDC shall not alter the terms of this Agreement or otherwise be applicable to the Parklands. 2.8 The City shall allow Developer to record Plats for The Parklands Unit 1 and Parklands Unit 2 upon execution of this agreement by the parties and either: (i) the City's acceptance of the public improvements required by the City as a condition . precedent to plat recordation with respect to the Plat to be recorded; or (ii) Developer's provision of a surety for any public improvements required by the City as a condition precedent to plat recordation that remain incomplete (including any Parkland Improvements, which Surety shall be in accordance with Sections 2.5 -2.6 above). Further, the City agrees that any surety provided hereunder shall satisfy any of Developer's Parkland dedication requirements applicable to the respective plat until such time as the Parklands within The Parklands Subdivision Unit 3 Plat can be dedicated, thereby also satisfying Developer's Parkland fee payment obligations in connection therewith. 2.9 Upon Developer's completion of the Parkland Improvements the City agrees to inspect the improvements and identify any required changes to cause the Park Improvements to be completed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. At such time as the City is satisfied with Developer's completion of the Park Improvements and Developers provision of a warranty bond for the respective improvements, the City shall: (i) Accept the Park Improvements and Parkland dedication; and (ii) Record the Parkland Deed; and (iii) Issue a letter to Developer evidencing the City's approval and acceptance of the Park Improvements and Developer's full and final satisfaction of this Agreement; and (iv) Within 30 days of issuance of the letter of approval and acceptance, release any Surety provided in connection with the accepted Park Improvements. 2.10 In the event Developer fails to fully complete construction of the Park Improvements within 6 years of the Final Plat Recordation of The Parklands Subdivision Unit 1, in the manner prescribed herein, the City may declare this Agreement to be in default and at the City's sole discretion: (1) Require that all Improvements be installed by Developer regardless of the extent of completion of the improvements on the Property at the time the Agreement is declared to be in default; (ii) Unilaterally draw from the Surety sufficient amount to complete the Improvements itself or through a third party; or (iii) Assign the Surety to any third party, including a subsequent owner of the Property, provided that such Improvements Funds shall only be assigned for the purpose of causing the construction of the Park Improvements by such third party and for no other purpose and in exchange for the subsequent owner's agreement and posting of security to complete the Park Improvements. (iv) Withdraw a lump sum payment from the Surety at the rate of $1,000 per platted buildable lot ($350 for parkland dedication and $650 for park improvements) to be accepted by the City as a fee -in -lieu of parkland dedication and improvement. Any remaining surety would be released by the City. 3. Approval of Agreement. The City has approved the execution and delivery of this Agreement pursuant to Section 21.4.15(C.)(2.) of the City's Unified Development Code, and the Developer represents and warrants that it has taken all necessary action to authorize its execution and delivery of this Agreement. 4. Governmental Immunity. The City does not waive or relinquish any immunity or defense on behalf of itself, its officers, employees, Councilmembers, and agents as a result of the execution of this Agreement and the performance of the covenants and actions contained herein 5. Binding Effect, This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, representatives, successors, and assigns, and the terms hereof shall run with the Property. 6. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts with the same effect as if all signatory parties had signed the same document. All counterparts shall be construed together and shall constitute one and the same Agreement. 7. Integration. This Agreement is the complete agreement between the parties as to the subject matter hereof and cannot be varied except by the written agreement of the Developer and the City. The Developer and the City each agrees that there are no oral agreements, understandings, representations or warranties which are not expressly set forth herein. 8. Notices. Any notice or communication required or permitted hereunder shall be deemed to be delivered three (3) days after such notice is deposited in the United States mail, postage fully prepaid, registered or certified mail return receipt requested, and addressed to the intended recipient at the address shown herein. Any address for notice may be changed by written notice delivered as provided herein. All notices hereunder shall be in writing and served as follows: If to the Developer: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT LTD 1616 Calle Del Norte #48 Laredo, Texas 78041 Attention: William Alston With copy to: DENTON COMMUNITIES 11 Lynn Batts Lane #100 San Antonio, Texas 78218 Attention: Eugene Patillo If to the City: CITY OF SCHERTZ 1.400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Attention: City Manager With copes: Denton Navarro Rocha Bernal & Zech, P.C. 2517 N. Main Avenue San Antonio, Texas 78212 Attention: T. Daniel Santee 9. Legal Construction. If any provision in this Agreement is for any reason unenforceable, to the extent the unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain among the parties, such unenforceability will not affect any other provision hereof, and this Agreement will be construed as if the unenforceable provision had never been a part of this Agreement. Whenever the context requires, the singular will include the plural and neuter include the masculine or feminine gender, and vice versa. Article and section headings in this Agreement are for reference only and are not intended to restrict or define the text of any section. This Agreement will not be construed more or less favorably between the parties by reason of authorship or origin of language. 10. Recitals; Exhibits. Any recitals in this Agreement are represented by the parties hereto to be accurate, constitute a part of the parties' substantive agreement, and are fully incorporated herein as matters of contract and not mere recitals. Further, any exhibits to this Agreement are incorporated herein as matters of contract and not mere exhibits. 11. No Joint Venture. It is acknowledged and agreed by the parties that the terms hereof are not intended to, and shall not be deemed to, create a partnership or joint venture among the parties. 12. Choice of Law. This Agreement will be construed under the laws of the State of Texas without regard to choice -of -law rules of any jurisdiction. Venue shall be in the State District Courts of Guadalupe County, Texas with respect to any lawsuit arising out of or construing the terms and provisions of this Agreement. No provision of this Agreement shall constitute consent by suit by any party. Exhibits List: Exhibit A — Metes and bounds for the Parklands Subdivision Exhibit B — The Parklands Master Development Plan Exhibit C — Itemized improvements cost and graphic Exhibit D — Phased Value Improvements Exhibit E — Park Deed f Signatures and acknowledgments on the following pages] Signature Page to Parkland Improvement Agreement This Parkland Improvement Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. Developer: ROLLING HILLS RANCH DEVELOPMENT LTD By: Name: Title: Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS § COUNTY OF § This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2015 by , the of Rolling Hills Ranch Development Ltd., on behalf of said limited liability company. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: Signature Page to Parkland Improvement Agreement This Parkland Improvement Agreement has been executed by the parties as of the dates of the Acknowledgments to be effective as of the Effective Date. City: CITY OF SCHERTZ, a Texas municipal corporation By: Name: John C. Kessel, its City Manager Date: THE STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE This instrument was acknowledged before me on the day of , 2015 by John C. Kessel, City Manager of the City of Schertz, Texas, a Texas municipal corporation, on behalf of said City. (SEAL) Notary Public in and for The State of Texas My Commission Expires: Exhibit A STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF GUADALUPE 194.56 ACRES Abstract No. Field notes £or Tex Texas and. out of the Carrol M Gall Survey , Survey Number 25, Abs Guadalupe county, Texas. Said 194.56 acre tract of land being Abstract Number 142, Guadalupe County, described as a 49.4 acre tract in a deed from comprised of the following tracts: Tract I being Hugo Zuercher and wife, Visa Zuercher to Elsa Zuercher and husband Eugene Froboese, alupe County, Texas; Tract 11 recorded in Volume 336, Pages 6�b d h in a Deed eed Records Erick James Roberson; Tract III being 47.70 being a 10.133 acre tract as described acre of land out of a called P60. 65 of the Official Public Records of Guadalupe ou ty, Son, Jr. recorded in Volume g Tract IV being 35.130 acres of land in a deed to She le Lee the Brumfield Public Records of Acton Brumfield, recorded in V. Guadalupe County, Texas. And Tracts being a 60.60 acre tract of land as described in a deed ic to Iola Deanna Smith, recorded in V61a eetrac7, emg more pain Carly descibed by metes Guadalupe County, Texas, Said 194.5 and bounds as follows: east line of Froboese Road BEGINNING at a one half inch steel pin offou tract same being the north corner of a 49.4 (County Road 376D) for the north Elisa Zuercher to Elsa acre tract as described in a deed from Hugo Zuercher and wife, Zuercher and husband Eugene Texas. Said point ea so being the 3West Pages corner of a 3.164 acre Records of Guadalupe County, tract. T11ENCE with the east line dOfor�the sotud� corner of2the aforesaid 3164 acre tract and being one half inch steel pin fours the west corner of a 5.00 as described of Guadalupe County, Texaseanded in Volume 105 , Page 446 of the Official Public Records THENCE continuing with the east tract, sSout come 3of the Eores dr 5.00cacpe 330'.25 feet to a one half inch steel p in found for tract. THENCE with the south line ofsth el aforesaid n found for a e tract, t o North V and beEast, g ton the west of 660.12 feet to a one half inch p line of a called 10.00 acre tract. ;t/ a distance of THENCE with the west line of said n foundc for accorner of this tract and be ng the south 250.59 feet to a one half inch steel pm corner of the aforesaid 10.00 acre tract. THENCE with the south line of said 10.00 area 10.00 ace tract 21! 4V as descibed in atdeed to f 552.60 feet to a one half inch steel pin found for Michael Alton Brumfield, recorded in Volume 1262, Page 233 of the Official. Records o Guadalupe county, Texas. East, a THENCE with the south line of Minch s Bel pit foundOfooa the east cola ergo 17/ the afo aforesaid distance of 554.57 feet to a one half to Iola 10.00 acre tract and being on the west 077 Page a 60.80 69 of the official public Records of Guadalupe Deanna Smith, recorded in volume 1077, g County, Texas. EXHIBI 1 ' A" Pag I- et a distance of E with the west line of said 60.80 acre trhe'south r ght-of -way lineso, f Forbes Road North 250 09' 47" THENCE 787.29 feet to a one half inch steel pin found on (County Road 376D). THENCE along the south right o£ -way line of Forbes for the no thtco6nex o'ftliesaid 60.50 acre THE of 1100.516 feet to a one half inch steel pl tract, ct steel in found North 54° 13' 09" East a South 240 35' 18 THENCE with the east line of said 6o•8e half inch She l plinfo four three 'South 24° 42' 57 East' East, a distance of 915.17 feet distance of 1024.08 feet to a one half inch steel pin found and distance of 9 68,40 feet to a one half inch steel pin found for the east corner of this tract and being the east corner of the 60.80 acre tract. the west corner of a 50.80 acre tract luas THENCE with the south line of the 60.80 acre fQ tract, South 66° 50' 26" West, f distance p 2092.06 feet to a one half inch steel pin e 115 of the Deed Records o described in a deed recorded in Volume 1064, page County, Texas. 5° " East, a distance n of p h steel in found fo most east corner of this tract. THENCE with the west c e of thpe 50.80 r the southern acre act, South 20 21 1392.88 feet to a one half z THENCE with the southeast line of this tract, South 60° 1S' 11" West, a distance of 92.39 feat 'ne half inch steel pin found and South 6of a 31, Sr 10.133 acre tract- half of 565.99 feet to a one to a o come half inch steel pin found fot the sou ° , 40., West, a distance of `THENCE with the west line teel pin 10.133 t acre tract, North 29 27 4.89.45 feet to a one half in South 60 30 01 W ° r " West, a distance of 1087.65 THENCE with the southeast line of this tract, feet to a one half inch steel pin set on the west line of a 60.$0 acre 25° 04't06" West, a distance of set and North 25° 05' ?0" West, a distance of 625.48 feet THENCE with the west lme of the set acre tract, North 441.48 feet to a one half inch steel pin to a one half inch steel pin found for the east corner of the afores0 05 4 , West, a distance of th THENCE with the car south line of the 49.4 acre tract, come post or the southwest corn of this tract. 1364.14 feet to a fen 56" East, a car corner post and North 310 47 of East' 1 NCE with the west line of this tract anf�n being on the east line of Ecl <art Road, North THE 29' 19 West, a distan ce of 1562.62 to a distance of 25.80 feet to a fence corner post and North 64° 19' 50 East` a distance feet to the point f 13EG1NNXNG. o ereby certify that these field notes were prepared from an on the 1, Jerry D. Wilke, Jr., h prepared under ' ' ction and supervision. ground survey pie ' p o¢ rk, EXHIBIT °A° �f I/ eft ©:iEgttecs;�, Page ©F c%> /2gis �. Wit , Jr. d rofessional Land Surveyor No. 4724 rrore LAUD USEDU4SMK TABLE fU AWV 0111WI6) u,"ITs .(ACRES) lRdfTS10Y$ LOT SIZE L.7,51. r. fA�ES) IITVA�—VV W—S) T SCHEDULE 1 LO 'A'�'VfMAM*ROiV.,X'PAM�'Er�TN��Dl�la'PA�VIAY& L' �A -WCQUEGrQRAMTA f)8 51 62 IdA o &. 1293 233 I—W,42—�?EPI —9F—VAYS.VNLESSOMERMSEROMD nor. 2 nary. ,7 tm to Snu. 4.41 1.18 31, 2 THIS 3 6262 162 75 46 31 102 11,67 2.43 2018 VIAITTI— — cl—cp- 4 1. M 50 0 o 218 — — B.o.1V — tm I. Im SEll� R=E ?m m tm fA NA RESiDEtfTlAL su.10— 14119 6131 114] 26.56 IIA IIA ME�W�—WCE A- �E mE-1) TIME 01AW— l—E 1341 Ill, toA to 164 NA 1. IIS 7 IIA TOTAL — & ELECTRIC 504 M' fLi NA 5.13` 134] 1E56 4: THEFRWMS - 50'R.O. W. STREET SECTION -LOCAL STREET 60'R 0.W. STREET SECTION - MODIFIED COLLECTOR 60'R-O, W, STREET SECTION - COLLECTOR TN rrc & 7. SCALE: 1'' -200' fL ALL FRIVABEQRQI—. COIYMWJAREAS, GREQ1811M, DWIPJAGE 0, 200' 600' S --SA?0f40—J--MF—OFSCH- LOCATION MAP 400' N.T.S. N31'48'01'E F - — — — — — — — --- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — _25_80' ° --___ — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — LEGEND COMAL COUNT N64'27'54E 110 -Y NW 19'55W 1360.11- 0.56'1 GUADAL GUADALUPECOUNTY UPE COUNTY 2 12 4 j3 3 2Y CYPRESS -ul 10 POINT 24 ij S 2z 10 UNIT ti 'E 60_] N64'28'18"E 660.12' 33 BtOGX2 37 - --------------- P 46 45 135 N64' 46E 552.61 N64- 17'4V��tii 1921s 0_ 0 9kq 4 H 47 12. 13 UNIT 2 �5 (4,57' '14�E 1024.08' N54-13 22 23 111 25 V 22 UNIT 4 A'x Tf �y O 4F= —Z7 'AA • A J IP UNIT 2 NF, 2 12 QN nn LOT 2 12 IT- J - 4 LOT0 ' S64'05'52"W 1364.14 -'50'31'W 2092.08' 8 7 2 v Rol V 17, SCHOOL THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISIO N I-P': 7 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEB 17 Z016 SCHERTZ, TEXAS GUADALUPE COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, 2 144.56 ACRES OUT THE JOHN NOYES SURVEYNUAIBER 254, ABSTRACT NUMBER 253, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS BEING COAIPRISED OF THEFOLLOVVING TRACTS: �oo UNIT 3 13 m cri 4 ZW1Ep pRE EUEGEIP FR080ESE8EL54 ZUERGHER --.ESE Y X MA HEIE? W41 T EL GIN F� -� S—T TO' JJJ 0 0) SH—EE MBFfSAI--Ta7—F-D S60* 3506W . —y—wRamsFcT .—.PCWM-Y NUMBER 14Z -- —fTY, M�S. Io �9 MACT V TRACT J! suwECTM ffox INIIES ERSM; wNd A l".. mI, 1AYEs O. s T�- Al I-- ICA11 Fn x0133 ALREs M`,croF LMI,, OWNEPIAPPLICANr' ROLLINGHILLS)RANCHDEVELOPMENT LLGC, REVISION NOTES (211&2016): M t 4 ATTN. WILLIAM A L S TON 21 20 1. REVISED PHASING FOR UNITS I & 2 TO REFLECT 1616 CALLEDEL NOR7ENO 48 113 LOTS AND 150 LOTS RESPECTIVELY —111u-, "ZI-1 LAREDO, TX 78041 EXISTING GB ZONING 7.58 ACRES COLLECTOR BETWEEN BLOCKS 586 WITHIN UNIT 1. E�xfs PHONE (956J 791-0057 2. ADDEDA THROUGH CONNECTION STREETTO TING PRE DEVZONING = 186.98ACRES 0 �VV S60* 1 "W PROPOSED ZONING FOR ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS ENGINEER 1 REVISED PHASING DEVELOPMENTSCHEDULE DATES. 56-r 99 92.39 MASTERDEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED DEVELOPAfENTDISTRICT(PDD). KFWENGINEERS 4 REVISEDBL CKNUMBERS TOBE CONSISTENT WITH 14603 HUEBNER ROAD BLDG. 40 o PLATTING. SANANTON10, TX78230 14E03tN£.4--A 41 wm€ IN — a PHONE.- (210) 979-8444 5. UPDATED LAND USE DENSITY TABLE TO REFLECT FAX 1211) 974 11 CURRENTPASING FAX (210) 979-8441 H [��/HIBIT B ee LAUD USEDU4SMK TABLE fU AWV 0111WI6) u,"ITs .(ACRES) lRdfTS10Y$ LOT SIZE L.7,51. LOT SIZE fA�ES) IITVA�—VV W—S) T SCHEDULE 1 4H50 f)8 51 62 IdA o &. 1293 233 2016 2 ,7 tm o 4.41 1.18 31, w" 3 6262 162 75 46 31 102 11,67 2.43 2018 4 1. M 50 0 o 218 — — B.o.1V — tm I. Im AA ?m m tm fA NA RESiDEtfTlAL su.10— 14119 6131 114] 26.56 IIA IIA SCHOOL s— 1341 Ill, tm toA to 164 NA 1. 1. IIA TOTAL 194.5E 504 M' fLi NA 5.13` 134] 1E56 2.- - SCHOOL THE PARKLANDS SUBDIVISIO N I-P': 7 MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN FEB 17 Z016 SCHERTZ, TEXAS GUADALUPE COUNTY LEGAL DESCRIPTION, 2 144.56 ACRES OUT THE JOHN NOYES SURVEYNUAIBER 254, ABSTRACT NUMBER 253, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS BEING COAIPRISED OF THEFOLLOVVING TRACTS: �oo UNIT 3 13 m cri 4 ZW1Ep pRE EUEGEIP FR080ESE8EL54 ZUERGHER --.ESE Y X MA HEIE? W41 T EL GIN F� -� S—T TO' JJJ 0 0) SH—EE MBFfSAI--Ta7—F-D S60* 3506W . —y—wRamsFcT .—.PCWM-Y NUMBER 14Z -- —fTY, M�S. Io �9 MACT V TRACT J! suwECTM ffox INIIES ERSM; wNd A l".. mI, 1AYEs O. s T�- Al I-- ICA11 Fn x0133 ALREs M`,croF LMI,, OWNEPIAPPLICANr' ROLLINGHILLS)RANCHDEVELOPMENT LLGC, REVISION NOTES (211&2016): M t 4 ATTN. WILLIAM A L S TON 21 20 1. REVISED PHASING FOR UNITS I & 2 TO REFLECT 1616 CALLEDEL NOR7ENO 48 113 LOTS AND 150 LOTS RESPECTIVELY —111u-, "ZI-1 LAREDO, TX 78041 EXISTING GB ZONING 7.58 ACRES COLLECTOR BETWEEN BLOCKS 586 WITHIN UNIT 1. E�xfs PHONE (956J 791-0057 2. ADDEDA THROUGH CONNECTION STREETTO TING PRE DEVZONING = 186.98ACRES 0 �VV S60* 1 "W PROPOSED ZONING FOR ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE LIMITS OF THIS ENGINEER 1 REVISED PHASING DEVELOPMENTSCHEDULE DATES. 56-r 99 92.39 MASTERDEVELOPMENT IS PLANNED DEVELOPAfENTDISTRICT(PDD). KFWENGINEERS 4 REVISEDBL CKNUMBERS TOBE CONSISTENT WITH 14603 HUEBNER ROAD BLDG. 40 o PLATTING. SANANTON10, TX78230 14E03tN£.4--A 41 wm€ IN — a PHONE.- (210) 979-8444 5. UPDATED LAND USE DENSITY TABLE TO REFLECT FAX 1211) 974 11 CURRENTPASING FAX (210) 979-8441 H [��/HIBIT B ee ,I 'k4 Will J1 1 0112:7jj I ME Improvements Component Sport Court $42, 00 No f nce around, concrete sla Playscape & Surrounding $70,000 includes with cover & ADA Pavilion, slab $42,000 Excludes trash cans, tables, water fountain Playing Field mygoals $14000 Just goals & pmnt- ouel,ecnv euingra4ims&|amu./i,r. Landscape, Irrigation, Meters $95,000 Permanent irrigation 10`Sidevva|k(2,205LFat$4.50 psf) $89,225 | .Grading vements & Land Components) $626,025 (Total # of Lots in Parklands is 505) Land Price (5 Ac. @ $1psf - entitled w/ utilities to Land Component site) $217,800 1per lot 1$176,75,0 1 vements & Land Components) $626,025 (Total # of Lots in Parklands is 505) rl LOT 20 BLOCK 18 'Lu CS 10' SIDE WALK no 12'XI2'PAD FOR WATER FOUNTAIN r m w 12 11 1 2 4 Lu (D q 5 6 PHASED VALUE OF IMPROVEMENTS The Parklands Subdivision Unit & Lot Count Description Amount Notes Unit 1- 113 Lots (27 %) Improvements Portion $110,220.75 Surety Amount @ 125% $137,775.94 1. Total # of Lots for Units 1 -3 is 415 2. Total # of Lots in Parklands is 505 3. Park Improvements to be completed with Unit 3 Unit 2 - 150 Lots (36 %) Improvements Portion $146,961.00 Surety Amount @ 125% $183,701.25 Unit 3 - 152 Lots (37 %) Improvements Portion $151,043.25 Surety Amount @ 125% $188,804.06 Unit 4 - 90 Lots Improvements Portion $0.00 Surety Amount @ 125% $0.00 Grand Total for Improvements Components $408,225.00 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Development Services - Engineering Agenda No. 9 Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -107 — Conduct a public hearing and consideration and/or action approving a Resolution adopting the land uses assumptions and Capital. Improvements Plan and possible imposition of roadway impact fees. (B. James /K. Woodlee) .T41XIM -1k,018"I Staff has been working with Freese and Nichols, Inc., to update the City's Thoroughfare Plan and develop a roadway impact fee ordinance. A roadway impact fee provides a funding mechanism for the implementation of roadway improvements that add capacity necessitated by new development. It also provides a basis for a Schertz specific rough proportionality analysis. The City currently charges water and sewer impact fees. The Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) establishes the process and notification requirements to adopt impact fees. The first step requires City Council to set a date for a public hearing to consider the land uses assumptions and capital improvements plan for the area where impact fees are to be charged. On October 24, 2017 City Council approved Resolution 17 -R -93 setting the date for the public hearing to consider adopting the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for November 28, 2017 Adoption of the proposed resolution will not create an impact fee. City Council and the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAO) will still have to consider and adopt roadway impact fees and establish the amounts to be collected in each service area. Approval of this resolution adopts the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan that serves as the basis for determining the maximum fee that can be charged per State Law. Staff anticipates that being considered by the CIAC in January. The TLGC outlines a notification and public hearing process for adoption of the impact fee ordinance, which Staff expects to occur on February 20, 2018. The land use assumptions establish four roadway service areas that are up to six miles in diameter, the maximum size set by state law. 10 year growth projections are developed for each service area, projecting the amount of residential and commercial growth. Commercial growth is broken down into 3 categories of employment: basic, service and retail. Growth and future development projections were formulated based on assumptions pertaining to type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses. The Capital Improvements Plan is really the Capital Improvements Plan for roadway impact fees and as such does not include all capital projects. Based on the above mentioned land use assumptions, the demand for new roadway capacity of collectors and arterials is projected over the next 10 years. As this is a 10 year projection, some expensive segments, such as the extension of FM 3009 across FM 78 have not been included so as not to incorrectly inflate costs of needed roadways have been excluded. City Council Memorandum Page 2 If this item is approved by City Council, staff will begin meeting with stakeholders to solicit input regarding roadway impact fees, including the maximum allowable cost per service unit in each service area. Staff is anticipating inviting interested boards and commissions to that presentation — EDC, CCAB, and TSAC. FISCAL IMPACT N/A RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Council approve Resolution No. 17-R- 107 ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -R -107 Draft Legal Notice CIAC Draft Minutes from October 11, 2017 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions Report Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan Draft Report RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -107 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ADOPTING LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS AND THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ASSOCIATED WITH ROADWAY IMPACT FEES, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee has reviewed the draft land use assumptions and capital improvements plan for roadway impact fees for the service area designated in both documents; and WHEREAS, the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee has recommended that the City Council of the City of Schertz adopt the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan along with the service area in both documents as outlined in the minutes of their October 11, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council on October 24, 2017 . City Council approved Resolution 17- R-93 setting the public hearing date for consideration and adoption of the land use assumptions and capital improvements program for roadway impact fees for the service area in both documents for November 28, 2017; and WHEREAS, the Notice setting the public hearing date for consideration of the land use assumptions and capital improvements program for roadway impact fees was published as required per Section 395.044 of the Texas Local. Government Code and the land use assumptions and capital improvements program including service area maps were made available to the public as required by Section 395.043; and WHEREAS, on November 28, 2017 the City Council of the City of Schertz held a public hearing; therefor BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Section 1. The City Council hereby accepts the draft minutes of the October 11, 2017 City of Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee as shown in the attached Exhibit A; and Section 2. The City Council hereby adopts the land use assumptions and capital improvements program for roadway impact fees including the serve area in both documents as shown on the attached Exhibit B; and Section 3. The City Council hereby sets the public hearing to discuss and potentially adopt roadway impact fees on February 20, 2018 . Section 4. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 5. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 6. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 7. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 8. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 9. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT B tA �N MW W N N d O u .b IA u U 1� /1 W z a W O zz O z Q 1 O m�ammca� ,,;n ma.m �m ym >C•_LL3m_Imm E cmot MOQO `m Ho�.y -occ pciLL� opt AmmaI —Ec U°1a>'p~ o y N ACT Or•mm �� 2M Z,:01 W.L-y '°��a.m�c Eo�O -'n 1�U xom mNa A•.O1 -•YO m Zc 10 c Q'P-i L�°,'°p`1 °a.�Y N`_o uEm YiL~rnm dr-1 m.Ec° OF ma OU pc1��.'L1'�n TE NZf"F OM y'� `o�Omc m`ox�"'cpai•...c °o NcU ^CW' v =aciY `1.oa '-"002 Cri ada, o. LE °c O1 -`o 3a�. -En y2i cv wUZ� co N uapl ' Z mCNLH NLN O °NOlt'N N,o moo° UGC ZO Xm c V' .�m1,..3`00,0+'lc_O WLV nE �1p°- uQm E.° my. Nmm cX mC OZ WLL mm O F'� ~O pxi .. Z C' •p-11 �_ °'o1 p1 m p1C.L.W0001 cGopQX �c cW .° -C HO V- mHY Q D "'pmp`1�Eo rn�.. -E �O � uy �'oF UN O co1i1 C ZZa. a Lncc >>.. C L`3 N mmxmol F•- HZ ym3 dE�p`�p=i�w o01 ' -° a VM<Bic.�` .c �`t.m -•yc vtau HO �y"p= w L =.O Esoco °m�a,v iz O 3mcow= u+- =v.'S'�v1v1? moZ2 CnU 1-.. Cn O Q ._ c,Y c E m o nm`.. a1 O.E m i p1�.,° d Z�VItLi7FU ° v m.°. v > °n`IQ//C m ammcal �;omam �m .L-• m > c._tL m!!' m m o N c.nw -X. ocN«•..3 m Ec �Do. O ,c Z O m o�`m ? O1 �mL«m • ..CW, am oy c ° c '>E°c>mmy o •m d 4L_ � o k° 8- mc0 v o vio am O C pL LL Emm -n J�xo`+- •EV�•a myW --," mZJC I-N- on 'a'� AL m-O m -� mrn>o N.OF tU0 o.N m c ° t OLL Uo L m o @--w c« m o nm d-O m N YVI ry 0� - 2r C •N� =yLL mIQ- mm ma ma ca.. u mL`o n._•��p=i -m°y pu W' E y00~ CeMI 'L-'m `o'pO N °yol�cm °oo'o,.1W c�aci W.o'o O Z uE •-0 O m mc p-1 `o 3ac� -.En M•cVl�r+ �O°'.E +'poi �, pOiVZC mN C/1X aY° cm3"- p`10+L- '��.°c 01 Q p`1c 1°noz WC N1°yo�o° 'oQpc Zp w c c •� o p1.y^a _ F- W E W c m m >• cza OZ wLL m1O FN- aaoc�ao��•�3a ncmu Y m-Cm >,L�a� v wX ~O pxi .. Z Q mVW.,.� °'c1m m mss p`'oc� ornc oQx a�i c•_c�cow --non F� LL EF-° Q m•��LEo• rnam�Y mm_ >,oW n•-o =m�1 +L' `m.°�z H O} 0_ p _ OL ncO o+jmol C cWF- ° mxm L Zc U wz ° Z = ca QO 'L'010 u' ~ 'Eo Es oc O. `o p1 0 �1O E.1'o O o�� ul°OaYtyn� ? �U I-O c�=0 w O cmca3 °�mp`1 «'O.10 o= C omc.c•c0 o cnU .. Cn.� O 2 = cscomon..�cEmum� VwOt/fi --V ��y M_8s; j,oWF azc�co ��.LW. yE'.mcc cy"i,m °a�CCmp`>j•a �`a Et a7�y ��c�yccmL�`o moo c�1p c.°nEccm UL ~ °"Y E+- EomE °ma0. �� wEc°i�Eovimo�• -L > a_°m .��WWn.;EE.i uE3°y3 >nm._t °n `, mcm�01 c„`W,oO� m¢cr L ��`^Om rnm =h'O W3Y m Waal mi��3acmL mo�LZ m h.cmatOEaiyc1O >i��1�a E•° v m01�z'�p or°p`10 °c -a ai�ac.Y .°.•�vcmi"-omc a.0��moyo, `�' •- LCn"'1 E�`pi.m•L �. �co = :•�'�mj3 °u mY`0 'c°u�ai� v�'�'om °O -1oc� omoa `1 0 o1Y m ac+ W ^m W_�>•. -YW �c >7; j2 rn m c�alm.om WEx°w'='.c.0 W `c:oo E�.m �mmpf mono Eca . �E E2 l�t�`o .cm Saar mm�ou Esm E t L.oc�U omNO.°o.Tm c°iY Ny ET01�"o moo. pci' -'am cy Xi . Yas ot�ovmi Ea vionlm3 =-^jU >:m °vL. =y3moo cc wcF =o ono «� - 000F, m -m OAS cola Eon m _ot rn�o mo �myEcn0m m� >+°'~ 01,Cc me pl N'U nom mt> L •�28 mOammOpC N " CUjN y�Ly0 �Ev =m 'rmQ3QOa1`.. =mc -��_• `pLCma`1 _•='oc'<xaEc =pci aavW 1Oav mama me a mc°1�`•oa E,- 'nE == E>.1OOj�mvEr E� oa W mWolIx °c�'o cmpls•-�a v°,"xi� EEomn ¢ua v°ivv 0.>•wmc.nL nOc ?a.L..m�Nlo c°�y�'n$'c..$3m -� .m -iom0 °�cm EY OtL ��?:C— ''am EL m- °n nv m01>a� m_cvmo�,m N m+=• U 3� o mL °�Lz _=.T o mrna .- Y�Nm >-c05m QUO am c m OU •°Oy30�o E E �oalm Cy=mEx m mm 3? tz a`1 m E m 01 poi p'i a o n v o -��-p1 °`m EO o`pltcmamo •.- m NCO aloZ a ml Yy ac.0 L+ m m c� E °«L . =8, C mN � X °m vcF= m T� i O _ �o ? N O >- cE o 30 5m mO x+ m U - H O ZUF� n p°1 U -C: 0 cG _h apLO, j Os N p� U N O ii O m EliumcY1'xm0 z °c °Yp101��co WCL Yyc = �Q3jpOmo =maz = vEOCa«Em�m °DES .v cwac�oL-'C,ii1 •- E --o°�z �`m �1 ap1"a °m E=u.o a hp Joocmu u.. oc- °oycoE5im 3Y - o�Wm0o« 0- 1r'-U`- 00- occo`m c S° O uWa`�aE•°p'_° 's°p`"i'�°x 'o1N.01= -vU ou� `�• °..c -• m m.±% �'. m,•W �.L• �m y m o =+'° -• �° ==OZ oomp�m ~W�H Lxwomm °�L -n hmom U.S �mWO O"yO NWM UCO E WUUL CX =e- 13001 N n�LO.r �aL.•CN O to OOOC N � om °OEa wp1�Z T �c°n�•'w�rnc� . p`1 m•o 11'�ma v°ic mc?0 >.o+L- ''= U�o13oE nEcy, m c•�Q �p °-lxo oto'C C1O lcv c�°�'m -��1 •s mom > a aE�omm5.�1o.°�n ¢uam ION�TdQCN OxC O X EiL OmXC WC� OYp CL LAC. m� cp11pZ•� -.m �0 amScx'^C° Vin° ~ate ,,°3 c�m0.°. E�p'm SUE j m Sv. °L'-'tmc�i ao m m �a o� �o v �E'E�aa Cu c nx;n ma W3Yp ca mm�•c of � yxm� Cytcpo WJ OOH,,, u'O H+t"�Na+ "'• my _Y'^ Imo m , CpCC•� }�mOapM° i IM O��>m, X'°1p a+•°Cm m0°'�' x?N 3: . maO O.t ot,3o vmi o om. C�NONU OF O. F M= 2. m=o,om -O YO C� rvj.'co `mK.E =om W��may�m omcyamc W=0m .Empci oX,LC_1 a'�y1M•� v c>.E_vv2alon E nEP Jd O.GOm 3=:'30.U$N+m. of FEE'o. o5 ., °n auarn; itm•� om mia5LCN.p1 N��VWiOW C m V °>- stmvoiYUEgOm_aIc 2 r "2'5 Emm -On JC7�Cm a aC°.F to oaovL�W a" a sxE 3y2�mw EC C= omoQmN �_m0°. F.i-° xr ' o dN .L-•y C .O °m =N °pximy Oa sOO 31- co mN V4 .no _WQ m-LU OY S W mo O•°ooc.o oocF -Ci W c ZO QW me �� „.,cm3onc ~m01La n•�� Ycp"'X a OZ WLL 16' a�a� a�00�a �c O• >301�3Y° 01p'cOm y> F -F- F -O X z 1'W mw y'm m m p1 W O,c v N�Mr a1 Q= LL EF o Q v1 p1•n1 iL f N o� o °o °ta_mo• -m U wZ mom Z Za' �acpai3c � "ami0� ='cam_ W V� °� t ~O ��o twt. �p m °mp'n`o+a1•o`1° .,3 a U�p10 la -O mo w ZZ >m °mc.n°ya1 +°'cam o NtyT Wi U CAU min... O QQ ._ cs c o m o n...- o_E m y mw. d ZF -haW' y.m W C�LLCN._ m'OU1N>.m c ocN...•..00c_> Ecm OQOx '�'a �i a Z o� mmW�olc `uE Omma olc a N O 30z Ng min '.N-.•CV°u�o vio .° c'i a W a-• O^ u E Oo •�v7 mom, A Y>. aL.•Yyva1 =9mi UL fTm °CA c a3 H IFQ- mW; aw N'z 1 mm g. O.pO �vmi° NOl`+ �• mcU�C O'j N+L-' p`1.0� Y Dy mN tnX ao mE«%`o�3"- !E �ymo�o�m` U ZZXcwa e-I'� x d 'Yiam?� ac Q cO13on0yc N OF my m y h E N FQN F.,,LL OO EF-Y F"' 0 a p,�C1 H O•`- N° m mp�U10E8._C p U wZ a;o O w W LL U n > cW CNOma Ni 'EOEY>OC o = cscomo__. n.Emom° vfi� Sv 2 o a N c.. itm•� om mia5LCN.p1 N��VWiOW C m V °>- stmvoiYUEgOm_aIc 2 r "2'5 Emm -On JC7�Cm a aC°.F to oaovL�W a" a sxE 3y2�mw EC C= omoQmN �_m0°. F.i-° xr ' o dN .L-•y C .O °m =N °pximy Oa sOO 31- co mN V4 .no _WQ m-LU OY S W mo O•°ooc.o oocF -Ci W c ZO QW me �� „.,cm3onc ~m01La n•�� Ycp"'X a OZ WLL 16' a�a� a�00�a �c O• >301�3Y° 01p'cOm y> F -F- F -O X z 1'W mw y'm m m p1 W O,c v N�Mr a1 Q= LL EF o Q v1 p1•n1 iL f N o� o °o °ta_mo• -m U wZ mom Z Za' �acpai3c � "ami0� ='cam_ W V� °� t ~O ��o twt. �p m °mp'n`o+a1•o`1° .,3 a U�p10 la -O mo w ZZ >m °mc.n°ya1 +°'cam o NtyT Wi U CAU min... O QQ ._ cs c o m o n...- o_E m y mw. d ZF -haW' mOE lUUY `-H Ip�L 61OY Ldv•E �y .Y A� -C1s :EE aC°.1ZQmm`p1FmrIUL" oEpE`1'o n�alEt °.n 0:cPa° `va AF- 'o-'La cirMt ao oar m5 N o E•5 ! . a1 3y ` nc cUw pci'O o .0 r°•13 'U �o,m -mm sm 01 m¢aQwap`im3U V~icp1 �Ema c,L-• u1c' m}Y>+,�` C OXm C7 x O m mrl =L `m-mm�Cw�cm TiNCCm Lxpciolp�Oa'L• m •m- •mo`Om ».c mK- ¢aL -•.=o NO.m,mE m•` --m m' -- 'T m1j°mmc E !l E IE' _- "Nmamccm� -" o a.L,9 WLOmW�`oH ccdm, vw m+•YLmoL O'ua -o..c mn•.- na.. ="E- «o o =m CL�'NU.- a1'�'�U'0�01p- �it'i� -w nc000m >,p10 pcia 'M- c°1'L'•- L�z " >L• ° -OV Eaon1 cQ3> MWt_ C aN ^mma °" �>' °ua- •;va? -oomE, nE cy, op;= uQF_�w ma °v `o .L.ma `m a.E°�lom ccp;,m °a ¢u-0 a1v t'c �cm^•- •.•oa•c> EotO p`�.' NVIQOx vN N�mccp p01i002 mp�i0 aN,.3xc x.Om �o °Yp1 a1�v o�mY tp`1t c.p1 om W aoY� -° >m opt E: o= .o OZ E._ X-�cm . Z„.,mc mx Z gym =ha:°OO mcOp°1io JO mOm cro•C °v pmi+° >w0V co1�w0 . -mm o+. ,W >"'+ -°• mon` 01� u13 u1oyo ONE $o a10 fOwmEmm -n Xo '1orCCm�'o. t ~>-ZC p`amCn c_"�1 •'vz ••` -�cE mnE c_ uLE FN oa a`o =m om.'C1C0 1� `W WO —t '-S VF- Qf -ma•.- aim•. -'c °b mv.°O E�'m-oncc °E• >>. •o:E -UO 'cm o� =a c'L -'mmo o_�uo.'E mpci UUF- v Y�OZtn o� °WO.p Om�oomHi�Z coExHa1� 3Y mFaF.-�. or ma m�0a��plw o-"�, phi mIL EAU m�m.m �>�E mZUCap1O Vv O.U' -pm�a� xE >Np`1v�E2>;° -1r^i L•u oa° 1. °d•r °o° nC� ^[Y QE mY �arn •L'=OyaOt �+L'". =Zomm,.,:o yt- •vmi >y ..mmv ��L�mi. =�L �t }N, nT.. J TvU °L °gym W O °_00'C O' i- 1•�UOia •a1EQV =mom n1UX1°S `Gr'1" F-oua �a�oy �mm L JC data i2 dyt -� y 01° p1 ZO XQ Tc y cW>iw NC+"'��LNd Cpmj� YrL WiL Nm�W -00>� -<Muo m�'m >L.r m °M�. y O�Cm X.mm a n�•yE -„ Z .a m a �QCn to c•i-L vi m a` c' OU� FQ F"-_'_ r y c +aWm ..• o o LL W Z- 1' =cp Em W .3o E o 'c c°m F 3 �co°v Cr�t mm = l Ca ' CW m CE o0 x .L�c m ucv1 L a. -• „m,� - .c mov m�m QZ V~1nw .y 1O �� :o •,tiu m°�� vXi= E �i3..,, .c_ p1a N .m D°LNTvU-'}= -rn°WrnW - � vU i m E m mLyo0 . E °mm dr= _ ,g - "' v WZ c W, O 8:6 E o W n a � o w .0 i ono o`�3 ° O CU O a ZU }`UZ Y�3='� aQc 1p1 . ', . na NOU �3 F=o nU'c..N�of n.E�omm��m�o, aua y-WO' y.m W C�LLCN._ m'OU1N>.m c ocN...•..00c_> Ecm OQOx '�'a �i a Z o� mmW�olc `uE Omma olc a N O 30z Ng min '.N-.•CV°u�o vio .° c'i a W a-• O^ yL.,L y �m y «. E a m c E n a•U xo.,_, •�v7 mom, A QM W ° p1 Oy m L U W C m c UL fTm °CA c a3 H IFQ- mW; aw N'z 1 mm g. O.pO �vmi° NOl`+ �• mcU�C O'j N+L-' p`1.0� Y r�1 }N Q W .n +° -• Y �� °o,cW O`WWOO Cpo �O- r°•1.11 mCm mE«%`o�3"- !E m pZ <UJ ° W N=om+ i mL vi m o H 1p [At' m =vom° n3�my3a n�`p`i� e-I'� x d 'Yiam?� a m m N'o ° F-F wm FLL 1co,c y y z F Z O cw mc°m�•> N W Q- F-� U LLO O} W2 E 0 ~° m ° z m W= W 0� `L"r G pL ytEo._rn " Ea ca L 'm F -�'oF, W CCp/ Ey W nz =al FO LaW.•o LL ma W ca3 mom Y >W3WC >WO.oy`m 3 U = EoEca°3 °2O1v+W- •a'1a� CJL C WQ� °C C am-•t" C vam- •�+L -•t a :Ecuaa..�> > fqU = cscomo__. n.Emom° p>'i�m.c°.WCO d Zd'NVIF -U °vmp OS >° mOE lUUY `-H Ip�L 61OY Ldv•E �y .Y A� -C1s :EE aC°.1ZQmm`p1FmrIUL" oEpE`1'o n�alEt °.n 0:cPa° `va AF- 'o-'La cirMt ao oar m5 N o E•5 ! . a1 3y ` nc cUw pci'O o .0 r°•13 'U �o,m -mm sm 01 m¢aQwap`im3U V~icp1 �Ema c,L-• u1c' m}Y>+,�` C OXm C7 x O m mrl =L `m-mm�Cw�cm TiNCCm Lxpciolp�Oa'L• m •m- •mo`Om ».c mK- ¢aL -•.=o NO.m,mE m•` --m m' -- 'T m1j°mmc E !l E IE' _- "Nmamccm� -" o a.L,9 WLOmW�`oH ccdm, vw m+•YLmoL O'ua -o..c mn•.- na.. ="E- «o o =m CL�'NU.- a1'�'�U'0�01p- �it'i� -w nc000m >,p10 pcia 'M- c°1'L'•- L�z " >L• ° -OV Eaon1 cQ3> MWt_ C aN ^mma °" �>' °ua- •;va? -oomE, nE cy, op;= uQF_�w ma °v `o .L.ma `m a.E°�lom ccp;,m °a ¢u-0 a1v t'c �cm^•- •.•oa•c> EotO p`�.' NVIQOx vN N�mccp p01i002 mp�i0 aN,.3xc x.Om �o °Yp1 a1�v o�mY tp`1t c.p1 om W aoY� -° >m opt E: o= .o OZ E._ X-�cm . Z„.,mc mx Z gym =ha:°OO mcOp°1io JO mOm cro•C °v pmi+° >w0V co1�w0 . -mm o+. ,W >"'+ -°• mon` 01� u13 u1oyo ONE $o a10 fOwmEmm -n Xo '1orCCm�'o. t ~>-ZC p`amCn c_"�1 •'vz ••` -�cE mnE c_ uLE FN oa a`o =m om.'C1C0 1� `W WO —t '-S VF- Qf -ma•.- aim•. -'c °b mv.°O E�'m-oncc °E• >>. •o:E -UO 'cm o� =a c'L -'mmo o_�uo.'E mpci UUF- v Y�OZtn o� °WO.p Om�oomHi�Z coExHa1� 3Y mFaF.-�. or ma m�0a��plw o-"�, phi mIL EAU m�m.m �>�E mZUCap1O Vv O.U' -pm�a� xE >Np`1v�E2>;° -1r^i L•u oa° 1. °d•r °o° nC� ^[Y QE mY �arn •L'=OyaOt �+L'". =Zomm,.,:o yt- •vmi >y ..mmv ��L�mi. =�L �t }N, nT.. J TvU °L °gym W O °_00'C O' i- 1•�UOia •a1EQV =mom n1UX1°S `Gr'1" F-oua �a�oy �mm L JC data i2 dyt -� y 01° p1 ZO XQ Tc y cW>iw NC+"'��LNd Cpmj� YrL WiL Nm�W -00>� -<Muo m�'m >L.r m °M�. y O�Cm X.mm a n�•yE -„ Z .a m a �QCn to c•i-L vi m a` c' OU� FQ F"-_'_ r y c +aWm ..• o o LL W Z- 1' =cp Em W .3o E o 'c c°m F 3 �co°v Cr�t mm = l Ca ' CW m CE o0 x .L�c m ucv1 L a. -• „m,� - .c mov m�m QZ V~1nw .y 1O �� :o •,tiu m°�� vXi= E �i3..,, .c_ p1a N .m D°LNTvU-'}= -rn°WrnW - � vU i m E m mLyo0 . E °mm dr= _ ,g - "' v WZ c W, O 8:6 E o W n a � o w .0 i ono o`�3 ° O CU O a ZU }`UZ Y�3='� aQc 1p1 . ', . na NOU �3 F=o nU'c..N�of n.E�omm��m�o, aua y-WO' H N �o vu m0 Yn �o _ Q N N t 0 n Hv O v c N O N v o 0 O L" 3 m c c -E-- rmnrnc�c `°SUC.-Eovt, if- -ice o WjXU N= , m L�Y EC V U1 '`a O O°' t 'No E L•°L Cp C=N Nc o��oav mv'. -•1'iw �'Liwp1= CC'° ~01LpTjV� a,. E -jE_ -i E E. ¢ ou ao u,- cv °��N =vim° w,m w a o -_ U oNO��Hr cy� cn.n Vim•- •v w,'m= r. 3 tT m jvv�cov°n'2E °L a•- .. -a'n a; c m d >tn= = a) O Nm ~O� n "�y `.0 N d m e d E a � y x e.2 d E E d N �cc3c o owL= d NOJUNJ vvcU.�� ° ° s� ma '°_v�r -� LE� N C7 V d p CL 3 w .o E2 3 ra 3 .c P 79 ° O o V C ` P a o _ _ d rU. w c • Y N m m - U G� n •a • ® e0 •C7 C am a `O°. d ° •E ° _ ® C d _ - E - '>•" o d c H C a E _- - - G > A y b m 3 >3 `m - e�vo.cyoc'oj�EamiEZ a`iE co U m -N¢ -- ¢ -MUO: cw n ._ u.- d v=i"xi� Como 8 o c _ +•din rnv >;+-- °v>.YV� a Baca .L- YvY «'Cn to =o a�mcfOS Oar E$C toEo v� vYrvov vv�a vs>.•� - >�N m�os- .•a! =.s., a�•N.f ,o =no ot�° w ='°• -' L°-� ao >'dm �'� .• v avvca -ov>.v �-v o�•N+s•L.•oa.E�E E`Oa��' =' oc�`�Y "{�QOx �.N°''�n � �3v E min _?E?! 'a�Ed�EA3 °�. �- '� �'ov� - ^Y a+°•m zc°�t° -' aani 1OVCYtn� iia« c x�"o Y � Z 3a'y acs aci v`o Y'�-Ym�na >rnc vyc E,a�_�a vo � c as c E v- L" 3 m c c -E-- rmnrnc�c `°SUC.-Eovt, if- -ice o WjXU N= , m L�Y EC V U1 '`a O O°' t 'No E L•°L Cp C=N Nc o��oav mv'. -•1'iw �'Liwp1= CC'° ~01LpTjV� a,. E -jE_ -i E E. ¢ ou ao u,- cv °��N =vim° w,m w g E -_ U oNO��Hr cy� cn.n Vim•- •v w,'m= r. 3 tT m jvv�cov°n'2E °L a•- .. -a'n a; c m d >tn= = a) O Nm ~O� n "�y `.0 N d m e d E a � y x e.2 d E E d N �cc3c o owL= d NOJUNJ vvcU.�� ° ° s� ma '°_v�r -� LE� N C7 V �w+ C o o ..-. o. ... a c 5 i E L =t _ 'ocNEn�?�cZ'�°¢ii LL3_vsvwEnvNO1N- a > ~ o °tzo'va c wv E$�mgRE,- ,v -EY•y m� = =to NUO wn ExE -1,3 O - V _ o d ° E o i? of =' _ E d E m m _o - _ O O:tnwU >+ U`t?yUKTJ >�a =•ta OI\ LL O a)\v`I C Y- ea �� LL CO;pNW m . -aw �a1'� -._ oN •>.v�Eowca�i>.w•�c �- a. o. c _ v `o - - 3 v E y o o w oL�d° -Ym_w z ��•- U v °�$ ° -Of -�D �NI- rpiW N - a c C O•- -ammo ^E E O'=w. m ,N� n'o Ow L -•-oW .� '7 • . U G� n •a • ® e0 c _ - o d ,°-..- a. co o aL° -_ am a `O°. d ° •E ° F= �•occ �cc¢MEo- c O aN °ya•- o._ oom "-E pO Z �. ;,,._Z u °o.' rn°Y oxc Via.• Hv°oc�c�v OYL M•'y° -a-a m m d •uf- R - E - '>•" o _NO•- ami n`�a.•'a �'covtn N�wO «`• > w.�co ° =..°- {E�.n�o3 $w »N}�„ccw v Eui� ao, '°mom °tea �•oCP�M -x Ud a, •,a -�`-o o _- - - G > A y b m 3 >3 `m `- ° °. ,-. e�vo.cyoc'oj�EamiEZ a`iE co U m -N¢ -- ¢ -MUO: cw n ._ u.- n °ciao wE'O�v.+s"�acim m._ ww :'m EL 3 ae. v=i"xi� Como 2'i 0 o c z 2--m°L °gym °o °'n as Q �v.c. -�vL VCai O1 cp1.o 3'^-mc+-' C x076 XC . C O � Yvy r''UOd NN L L �tx o WjXU N= , m L�Y EC V U1 '`a O O°' t 'No E L•°L Cp C=N Nc �aYm vy O �' - >"cE v e•v cvm w n Z.,'U�1- U•�H-'Hx�-!a .�n v o OpZ w mva• ��0'=^�Ci•�� °c`�Z o °a NOEz;'- o -n _c v�° � says °1 '- °Da�'u- '- 3 -° =vvi mo�LZ= tat.Ev°i � rn°Lm "�y `.0 cn U. � -.�m° °° 'v a m m° �rnovo�'^ca amim c >'`u@.'tnta�mm w._:- L.•v.�.°v �am �E vv�E�x� U3u,.- '-"io m-a cs.•' -•vymo vocUa NC �y ��cvi� -O....... m 0FLt-"- i°x'°�`caai >.-• =._mTn :o- c0 vs °� voaa orn}' = �1O 1O U�c� �w. Nms �yv y °uoo.�.cv'a 3o LNG >,oy Ey J� >F '- � �vY ca Q. ¢.L -•�L � .yam. -® V� -__ m QooY•y� ,JNON v °+'v= �o's"v =a .vc? u°u�. �v° N>,v -.. - -` ov�nyvrn v �n'o `o vi.L.•mm"°rn�"�n a`im�y a`�CJ� Z °mom O d = cz d E .n - cxw-om- L mv`�o.o �'s- -•mfOy Yo .L°Q�ai.o>,�NCCV -mac x- ..�o1OV�° �_ywaLO`v E's"' scx a+'mc OOL VICO NYO -�E• Na Yt a`..S YiE'E E O °I�°F`o u v- °-°mcY U v>, -O =rm �a`i. ~ C7 cn V C = v c o.oY °vai v.aaf�._ o 16 1°v -E ¢vr'Y _ ms VY aL v3vv mEO3om °vs a5o 0M �o�= °u +°,�.v.NV =.y- °�ynv -am t>.$ v °NC�nc >,u _ °.° -L VLmmo x= .>..cc -°m a ovto 0 -- >.c as L3 a cyw >•- U G� n •a • ® e0 O - C . R R w'�3 maa ns. �.L.•�` -3° °w do= yco}_3 a- ^000 O� >.Eo m na+ O d= , 000'•�v_ -m °rn��r•r °cv -c.'e �'L °.c rnv`oov. ° -o��= nom -° o.E va .°c mOGmC�NaIUd�VIY�aL> -ge CNU�I=O.OA TOOC�N ~C mC�c� ^m'- �.- v.0;'O a tCaVOY o O� N _ L� C d V R ..Q ' a. Q =a1R �W- CyCyamC a�� >.vc•.=- S�E3uwE >a�rl._ - Cv. N OC•_ N (U dm m. °- .c1Oa'vAmva .ocw�vnmr3v^o. vt°E� =E o�am 2!'EE •.v-va ocvocvv.°c_�°' Ud a, •,a -�`-o o Q= dy dad p1a =. • -p O-•CC d E a._ °'•-' "OcZa v m <a vUZO >•c¢ 3-09 u W - - oJ.°o'6m0 °'� ° Ot= cv NO U3¢on�YNx°oE n Ea_'oaoA�� o °n ac auvv=vovaon=Aancoc� } °vycohc°�o��E: o°YY3 0 -� v=i"xi� Como 2'i 0 o c z 2--m°L °gym °o °'n as Q �v.c. -�vL VCai O1 cp1.o 3'^-mc+-' +•din rnv >;+-- °v>.YV� a Baca .L- YvY «'Cn to =o a�mcfOS Oar E$C toEo v� vYrvov vv�a vs>.•� - >�N m�os- .•a! =.s., a�•N.f ,o =no ot�° w ='°• -' L°-� ao >'dm �'� .• v avvca -ov>.v �-v o�•N+s•L.•oa.E�E E`Oa��' =' oc�`�Y "{�QOx �.N°''�n � �3v E min _?E?! 'a�Ed�EA3 °�. �- '� �'ov� - ^Y a+°•m zc°�t° -' aani 1OVCYtn� iia« c x�"o Y � Z 3a'y acs aci v`o Y'�-Ym�na >rnc vyc E,a�_�a vo � c as c E v- o`+- -mm Jp pm mpv- 'yam �m N-Oc d Es ua cL V'°. - =- >.0 -L TCNO '°>.n =m pct o ¢ U._�� v0 ON ncv voyL -mc�U°+ ='m ut iav mac" cm c rn vo, -..cZm vLCErn c y �D �� ='u 1-0. a >, `oa LL...s, -•1O n = •o a� a1OV >m+rn>.o '�aomLV youvcc my d0 sUF rn�n nN to o�_vi a Es ma sai�z'a rna a`�o °c ua vvi�c."., OC- �C(U >�-• =._taN °av �wovcm+a- voo`�ooyyY L�� QQpUa ¢o aN"c° alb N. c�00_d O tr >.Oy Y a)L7 Urpi Yd Nm L Dm- -w c'cvoo.mY° -�o�.v =-° A NEa+L- '�+a1000 -C- `LO°'C�`-O oar .p� L mF-CNU v to .'.'vb3UUlYCOUxdC s °ovu k°cv `°. y>,v =.- - =Y L°..o vvvm t°- 10.=+00 Ca CO E LXL mQ y m ms„L a ym a••X- F- cv m�Y .,cEx °1c= _ Zw O� a0 vm y'- °cc a °mc�oz1O a• .o _oo O �c�j".% (U CO ° L _v1 �.+NOOOCC C- oy m •N E• -,yv cy+-• E' -k-.c cXy- mCN ��LO uo aUY psmV o+-'L V•..-> Sym o� }N Eco3v� w TV ¢ a.- >. v^i UEa C n-6i G� Cam. Lm�v _ m a °w oo C1 OO1-m Mo oa ri;y -�� `Y.. aYNa`1c cE v acavaf °va a"o ° 0'�� -E Y?L- '- F °,.c vaa'Cvo1�u m -w Nv �>.�.'3 -°w ynai' -'am c m U ut-6 � n zZ NX o Qw �c �ym vt+ -• 't c 3•�- a`icL-'�yLV`wc va �v ioE v' `w O�vu"c�nc3° -'o y 30 vci CC v,., Ea ENO CUl'OO p� v°�m a1 C��O LL"c.vc3"�`o a1L Ct tT�O� a)� C Cy ° Cp.cc ITt''�tj N HI"- ° otO =cN o LULL a)c O v.. Z �� V°ivalom N O�+L.•O ° Ca1 -mss a } m�Om�JQN o OC C? �.0 a�m��L a) �.�. LN%�CryU =a lCaO "2 _U ++a+ E-U N QN O CF-O v• =-° OL O._OI Q udcE` cC Oy'/J -d tT m CSI"•' - N -m ON a) °E,3�E av vv 2.°U� U mcv vl\ c E wZ OO�n ~O c . -• -cnc Z N �ca0 �cv� -R >.E UOCCp� dv> Lx•y cs. =3ayn�v� ioY o E"'� oc Eocvvt_� -o aV1XU v oar- 01 IQ-O w w -EoE -o o+ -m�va• mcmca3��vv�c� oo y yccsso Loz mmv n aua maa n =•, -mno.c nc Y ccmo•. -oLV VKow o - }-O.. mu,N ouvi YaJ nUa�.�+�+m -.� H om0 O �.10'o NU Nor- U. O C' �cY C =�o°n..+ -O-_ m UNw d ZJQNF -U �w. N n �L �'7x Cy Z cc3 Oc� >iO t�.J O�-` . m L�Y EC V U1 '`a O O°' t 'No E L•°L Cp C=N Nc .= N 0 0No•11w C- C -mm ^- t'N� Mi•a O1O 0 LL' .c ON �c W �d omN-c • U3 N• v a n Z.,'U�1- U•�H-'Hx�-!a .�n v o ZZO _ o � 1 Ev . W<<F -o . r `n C_z 7 OYY "�y `.0 o'z ' � -.�m° °° 'v a m a Nv � o +> l -v 10 .V c - '� y C �a�v�.°. zO N J V °� z C_Zapw Or-i °� 15s i c @ E Y v 0U .o oo x 10 •- N'O.OIO c d0M�~ C= Yv • m � Q =- q c Fa G1N C t�v NaLL .o O �ccco.L O I- O� � o>� °'� NEF�m vEa•rn QN � L1 _>va Ov =a cLVOnsY n'o 1OV u�,U toa v =arc H •tJW-°o .-'>° Ft tS S SawJQ =� Y CE =d ..c L C.L... N1j J� U UEc oNU Y... -L .�L = AAO -OY =iJ NOO V C ` m ° dG O'CN�+ COMZ c0 m �Dr. y>.E pmh -I•-, mo C =1�Zw CL L 1d c m - ¢a+ xt a r z•'-m1\ Z° o CQM v mIQ., c.1 `�- n �= vnL cY a� ON m mN>� -U .00NnE dct= mU a'"I 1� O ONO• o a1 to L. y N >.° 0 `c� m..- N-aL -. t>o ° °- o c a oa o x rn c v -c o '--E-- O�.>i :72 >..n E v o c °' c � F ONE CGCU o m Q= dy dad p1a =. • -p O-•CC d E a._ °'•-' "OcZa v m <a vUZO >•c¢ 3-09 u W - - oJ.°o'6m0 °'� ° ov a aQowaa�o 0_�daQEOnv�v Ea mN Nz �vZ U ...c o c z 2--m°L °gym °o °'n as Q �v.c. -�vL VCai O1 cp1.o 3'^-mc+-' �y da aa�vooa �nv�- °• -_>. �co °'° ° -C:) vs>,w o1O« c �t� U n LL LLWa -,oaE > ter=' o_Z:� QW O ON�o¢inE c� >1OZ ''3oo.o OO'° zz xm ° �° N yLN U' :'. `ocmo.3a'_�3a -*E -c °�-a5; yO�tOE uU- d'�cv' al °vOj 1a� _ L Ou-- o c .>.•O cN N O W WO JH n = OE Us...v ° WLL U_ U_C (.7O O C a)yL., cm° � ~O LL O U N O O.� O NaL O j�0 alc 1-- N.. Z E� ¢ -°ucimo=- ° 3"'� cr- ma) a1 a °CO -° d ,aQL vL E o ° r�Im OQOx m•v 7 N V C F -COOS Ocw' Nam O.� °;n m N... d ZN'n c c�+a -• mm v N �� = iU N N Y ZHZ� ~O I.... F O Y Q LL CE•� -�/l aL+ ETa)iJQ O N O O OJC.F- gyp ' O- m a1 Y u d C U , Wz o C G O m v z _� _ CNOIT C n CO N °> >i C ` C- C W c�c'OOV'-v�d�aY1m °s._ >, ±+m NLLL O�W Us�c c�' O. alj NxtC «•N_L L Z NN'vI'10� Z�c^ R Llt W d a) Q vc c.�v a �o a z z ago Uoci:c�v'G,ciEmmE zV coon -• t>.a_m °..rn Qs-"v'3 W a =CL' O O W o LL w a EEo Esovno ° aE. =3 C mat O O 3L' m.°.Em� - vY�' =o Z.'_'.o''s"'' >-?�t mO I-Utaa uEw E.N¢ln0NNdY� NOU hCi fn D 7 CY CJA OO.� d.0 tCaUv�O•� d zZaQNhV dN UC }- pNO.�ImOo UQ C¢C ,o i� ?Cmi� W= x'c Z.O a1N A •' o `d .; aY= Yta�v�voE ' �' sm ' v m i 3 a cviHUOi 2,3 o°`to �a muy mO h� m iE vim c_o rZ6 c g times dm c m o v c o . YU�•� C N C>i to ^p,OafT W U"OO 0000.,1° Om H�m� vraH2 OYLY to Ff�' Oa1 -Nm OU BE•FaC m Os -Oy�� U''C'E �y NO C -nOw J O °--Z� C Q� INA O NYJ ` Q Oy EE��, ON _ a1 Wri Y �m GN NCnN L�.i QC m N Q� JF-OOM N °CMY u i __ a °U }pUa YNY� yU =YjMN� N 0 to G� KnMN ac Z'�rI.D ° •� ' - U Qm OU° lead toN a1��U, fnN� N 1 -i�l�� N T m OI�N N-°I- N -o3 --'r m m m NO d�'�y�� I\Z m,= - U.OL C: C7 �4 - ¢" a1� � �� m `- � dayaoa+L O�b ..mU =«•n�oa co c KF -O+ML C�N�J v � U�NM�r m m 0- Os -• Yrn � d o N - Q cf- dofm'O MCM J N �Mn oN �C' C13 N• O y ^� O -umo LL c zZ M 1 V . O mxH Ca0 W01 iU WO JO' m aO N .MV L �EOP i°_t� °m � C o - :fa -'tom U o � maO1i o m �Z�oi r°n ' m vii ° M aEi E U to ~� �O =F- o.°dN. E QN mF-o -' u ho'° o NQN c'D'`O� h(°1) a�l� .2 d ® ® [D o •C .a . N Cy.c�2' OQN a1Nr -I oO�U` 010 tiN E .O¢m0�a)O�C70Y�JL CONa1 °00'3' -'O v°iNK 'z t°nWN I�QN �Q , I z H co C� �N N N O �a Z mU U ry MN ° J NUa•CmC7 C N O�Q '°�� r-IN O�O .O�U(a Y� � OfOJ vI N -gym a1 V U mN O u O •Or ca 1U C °`E no�mNy�nm yO N "j 0110 �r\i� t� .«_.. g z �. lmo 0 �N t•1vW- DUmF -Stn WOO LL�fn�2(n <- o N o U c .rm':o, -� c.° JM.O •'y-a1 -�N.o in� n. J'�MCoo7M= ONN�OY Capital Improvements Advisory Committee Minutes October 11, 2017 The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee convened a Meeting on Wednesday, Oct 11, 2017 . at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Bldg. 4 Schertz, Texas. Members Present: Michael Dahle Richard Braud Ken Greenwald Glen Outlaw Dr. Mark Penshorn Staff Present: Brian James, Executive Director of Development Bryce Cox, Senior Planni Channary Gould, Planner Tiffany Danhof, Executi) Kathryn Woodlee, Direct 1. 2. 3. Call to order by Mr. Dahle called There Items for A. Consider and Capital Improve Members Absent: Ernie Evans Tim Brown i to City Council on the Land Use Assumption Report and the basis for a Roadway Impact Fee. Edmund Haas, Transportation Planning Manager for Freese and Nichols, provided a presentation on the Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee Study, and the Preliminary Capital. Improvements Plan (CIP). There was a discussion among the Committee, the consultant from Freese and Nichols, and staff regarding the projected demand in growth, service area structure, explaining the existing conditions analysis that included an overview of the existing roadway system, carrying capacities, utilization of roadways, and deficiencies. The Committee asked specific questions related to the estimated project pricing in appendix C and how the costs were derived. Mr. Haas responded that the cost estimates are based on unit costing with twelve month averaging in today's prices. There was a brief discussion regarding the total CIP cost and that only a percentage of that cost could be included in the CIP to cover growth over the next ten years. Mr. Haas explained that the remaining portion of the total CIP costs would be rolled forward and factored into future updates. 3. Staff and the consultant also presented the anticipated schedule for future adoption of the road impact fees. There was a brief discussion about the history of impact fees and how they are used. Mr. Haas explained that when the fee portion of the process is evaluated by the Committee, he would provide benchmarking for surrounding and similar sized cities regarding the impact fees they charge. Mr. Outlaw motioned to forward to City Council a recommendation to consider and approve the Land Use Assumption Report and Capital Improvements Plan. Dr. Penshorn seconded the motion. The vote was 5 -0. Motion carried. Adjournment. Mr. Dahle adjourned the CIAC joint meeting at 7 Accepted by City Council Date LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Prepared for: City of Schertz 141611TWUll 1 I WAMAIZITI October 2017 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75204 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 PURPOSE ....................................................................................................................... ............................... 2 1.1 Land Use Assumptions Report Elements ....................................................... ..............................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... ..............................3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS .................................................................................... ..............................4 3.1 Roadway Service Areas ........................................................................................ ............................... 5 3.2 Data Format ............................................................................................................... ..............................6 4.0 HISTORICAL DATA ..................................................................................................... ..............................7 5.0 BASE YEAR DATA ........................................................................................................ ..............................8 5.1 Population Growth ................................................................................................ ............................... 8 5.2 Population Growth Rate ...................................................................................... ............................... 8 5.3 Additional Growth Indicators ............................................................................. ..............................9 5.4 Existing Land Use .................................................................................................. .............................10 5.5 2017 Employment ................................................................................................ .............................11 6.0 TEN -YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS .............................................................. ............................... 13 6.1 Population 2027 .................................................................................................... .............................14 6.2 Employment 2027 ................................................................................................ .............................17 7.0 SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... .............................18 1.0 PURPOSE Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate impact fees. An initial step in the impact fee development process is the establishment of land use assumptions which address growth and development for a ten -year planning period (TLGC Section 395.001(5)) for the years 2017 -2027. These land use assumptions, which also include population and employment projections, will become the basis for the preparation of capital improvement plans for roadway facilities. Statutory requirements mandate that impact fees be updated (at least) every five years. This report, in conjunction with the roadway capital improvements plan, form the initial key components of an impact fee program. To assist the City of Schertz in determining the need and timing of capital improvements to serve future development, a reasonable estimation of future growth is required. The purpose of this report is to formulate growth and development projections based upon assumptions pertaining to the type, location, quantity and timing of various future land uses within the community and to establish and document the methodology used for preparing the growth and land use assumptions. 1.1 LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS REPORT ELEMENTS This report contains the following components: • Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the land use assumptions. • Data Collection Zones and Service Area - Explanation of data collection zones (traffic analysis zones), and division of the city into impact fee service areas for roadway facilities. • Historical Data — Information on historic population trends for Schertz and Guadalupe, Bexar, and Comal Counties. • Base Year Data - Information on population, employment, and land use for Schertz as of 2015 for each roadway service area. • Ten -Year Growth Assumptions - Population and employment growth assumptions for ten years by impact fee service area. • Summary - Brief synopsis of the land use assumptions report. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY Based upon the growth assumptions and the capital improvements needed to support growth, it is possible to develop an impact fee structure which fairly allocates improvement costs to growth areas in relationship to their impact upon the entire infrastructure system. The data in this report has been formulated using reasonable and generally accepted planning principles for the preparation of impact fee systems in Texas. These land use assumptions and future growth projections take into consideration several factors influencing development patterns, including the following: • The character, type, density, and quantity of existing development • Anticipated future land use (City's Future Land Use Plan Map); • Availability of land for future expansion; • Current and historical growth trends of population and development within the city; • Location and configuration of vacant land; • Growth of employment per the Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization ( AAMPO); • Known or anticipated development projects within the city, as identified by City Staff. A series of work tasks were undertaken in the development of this report and are described below: 1. A kick -off meeting was held to describe the general methodological approach in the study. 2. Current data of population and housing was collected from the city and other acceptable sources to serve as a basis for future growth. 3. A base year (2017) estimate was developed using city building permit data, U.S. Census and periodic population, household occupancy and household size data, and employment data from AAMPO. 4. A growth rate was determined based upon an analysis of data from recent building permit data, Texas Development Water Board, past growth trends and anticipated development to occur over the next ten -year planning period. A compound annual growth rate of 3.5% is recommended for the planning period. 5. A ten -year projection (2027) was prepared using the recommended growth rate, Staff input, and consideration of the future allocation of population and employment in the AAMPO regional traffic forecast model. Finally, adjustments were then made to consider known or anticipated development activity within the ten -year planning period. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 3 6. Base and ten -year demographics were prepared for the various roadway service areas which, in turn, correlate with the current municipal limits of Schertz. 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE Service areas are required by State Law to define the area served by the Roadway Impact program. Chapter 395 requires that service areas be defined to ensure that facility improvements are located in proximity to the area that is generating needs. Roadway service areas are different from water /wastewater impact fee service areas in that roadway service areas can consider only current city limits but not the extra - territorial jurisdiction (ETJ) while water /wastewater service areas can include both the city limits and ETJ. This is primarily because roadway networks are "open" systems to both local and regional use as opposed to a defined limit of service that is provided within water and wastewater systems. The result is that new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area. Chapter 395 stipulates that roadway service areas be limited to a six -mile maximum dimension, but must be limited to within the current city limits. Although the roadway service areas only recognize current municipal limits, an analysis including the ETJ was conducted in order to consider long -term coverage of the ultimate corporate boundaries relative to the six -mile maximum for the impact fee program. Figure 1 illustrates the roadway impact fee service areas within the ETJ. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 4 3.1 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS Figure 2 illustrates the derived service area structure for roadway facilities. These service areas conform to the current city limits of Schertz. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 5 3.2 DATA FORMAT The existing database, as well as the future projections, was formulated according to the following format and categories: Service Area Correlates to the roadway service areas identified on the attached map. The city limits serve as the roadway service area boundary. Housing Units (2017) All living units including single - family, duplex, multi - family and group quarters existing at the middle of 2017. The number of existing housing units has been estimated for the base year (2017) population estimate. Housing Units (2027) Projected housing units by service zone for the year 2027 (ten -year growth projections). Population (2017) Existing estimated population for the base year (2017). Population (2027) Projected population by service zone for the year 2027 (ten -year growth projection). Employment (2017 -27) Employment data is aggregated to three employment sectors and include Basic, Retail and Service, as provided by AAM PO. These service sectors serve as the basis for nonresidential trip generation. The following details which types of businesses fall within each of the three sectors. Service -- Land use activities which provide personal and professional services such as financial, insurance, government, and other professional and administrative offices. Retail -- Land use activities which provide for the retail sale of goods that primarily serve households and whose location choice is oriented toward the household sector such as grocery stores, restaurants, etc. Basic -- Land use activities that produce goods and services such as those that are exported outside the local economy; manufacturing, construction, transportation, wholesale trade, warehousing and other industrial uses. AAMPO prepares employment estimates at the Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) level, but some adjustments were needed to consider areas within the limits of the city. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 6 Figure 3: Historic Population Growth; City of Schertz, Comal County and Guadalupe County, and Bexar County 35,000 30,0(}0 25,000 20,000 15,000 10,000 5,OW Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. HISTORICAL Schertz is located approximately 16 miles northeast of downtown San Antonio and lies in Guadalupe, Bexar, and Comal Counties. Over the past several years, the Alamo Area region has experienced steady population and employment growth. Figure 3 depicts the historic population growth for the City of Schertz and Comal, Guadalupe, and Bexar Counties. Comal and Guadalupe Counties have maintained steady growth over the last 40 years with compound annual growth rates (CAGR) around 3.5 percent. Meanwhile, Bexar County, which encompasses the City of San Antonio has maintained a slower growth rate of 1.8 percent. The City of Schertz's population statistics begin in 1990. Between 1990 and 2010, population growth was steady with a CAGR between 3.5 and 4.5 percent. All indicators suggest that the city and regional population growth will continue in the near future. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 7 5.0 BASE YEAR T This section provides information and documents the data used to derive the 2017 base year population estimate for the City of Schertz. 5.1 POPULATION GROWTH One method of predicting future growth is looking at past growth. Schertz has experienced steady growth over the past decade. Past growth trends from the U.S. Census were examined in conjunction with single family building permit data from the city (Figure 4). The city estimates a 2016 population estimate of 39,453 residents in Schertz using the U.S. Census Intercensal population data of previous years. 5.2 POPULATION GROWTH RATE A compound annual growth rate (CAGR) allows for a general assessment of growth, considering periodic increases and decreases in residential population growth coinciding with changing economic conditions. Various sources were used to derive past growth rates (Table 1). These sources indicated rates of growth between 2.6 and 4.1 percent. Based upon this data, analysis Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. Figure 4: Schertz Population Growth Trends Table 1: Growth Rates Source Growth U.S. Census (5- Year)* 3.4% U.S. Census (10- Year) ** 3.5% Future Growth Projection 3.5% *CAGR Based on 2011 -2016 Intercensal Data * *CAGR Based on 2006 -2016 Intercensal Data Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 8 Figure 5: Historic New Building Permits Source: City of Schertz Building Permits Table 2. Regional Growth Comparison Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. of 10 -year forecasts, and City Staff input, a 3.5 percent compound annual growth rate was determined to be an appropriate assumption for the 10 -year study period. It is believed to account for periods of rapid and stable growth expected to occur in the future. This rate was recommended by the Schertz Capital Improvements Advisory Committee on May 13, 2015. 5.3 ADDITIONAL GROWTH INDICATORS Residential building permit data is also an indicator of recent growth trends. Cumulative single family residential building permits issued since 2000 are shown in Figure S. Annual single family residential building permits are shown to the left, depicting the overall trend in annual permits. Although building permits issued decreased after 2003, the issuance has remained steady over the last few of years. From 2011 to 2016, the trend shows a rate that will maintain permit issuance and growth in the future. Local population projections shown in Table 2 indicate that growth will continue in Schertz in the future. These population projections from the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), City of Schertz Parks Plan and City of Schertz Population Projections indicate robust growth is likely and will continue for the next 35 years. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 9 5.4 EXISTING LAND USE In any evaluation and projection of future land use patterns, a documentation of existing conditions is essential. Analysis of existing land use patterns was prepared based on Schertz's 2013 Sector Plan and 2002 Comprehensive Plan, which includes current city limits and the ET1. This also serves to document the present physical condition of the city with regard to any infrastructure deficiencies that may exist. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 10 5.5 2017 EMPLOYMENT 2017 base employment was calculated using data from AAMPO. This information provided a breakout of employment by Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) for 2010. Figure 6 shows the location of the TAZs in each service area. For assumption purposes, these numbers were grown uniformly with specific adjustments made to TAZs to match estimates provided bythe city. It is important to note that the TAZs do not follow city limits in some locations, so adjustments were made based on the locations of existing land uses and upon the percentage of each TAZ located within city limits. AAMPO employment data was categorized as basic, retail, and service (see page 6 for a description of the employment categories). Using this data, the total employment could be found for basic, retail and service businesses in each service area (SA). Table 3 details 2017 employment within Schertz's city limits for each TAZ. Table 3. 2017 Employment by Service Area Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 11 r � "s. ✓ �� f 1 0� 1144 / 114$ �` ✓" 770 # 1112 '4 1r 1121"' "° ` 5 i� �� 1143 tu'@ t � 1106, of ° ?71 F 1113 1457 E 11 2 '�� X y 7111$ 4 1 1145 ; 2a 1088 E` ' 772'x' 7 ?81 1123 4 tm�°�� 1167 i�� ,..,� 10 9. a 1124 y �. 1144 101` caw w J 524 W!" 1116 » ,„ . ` f ;,1125 1 95 kt� _ N COMNtNdCtv.9ERMCGr: grrPGR%4NITY 5 Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. 779*'° rzwr rxnrox:r.�xrxu+o` "0" �. rt1;1',,„� 1094 778 1^780 w ^ ' �� , .� S�bow y,,aar 1140 4 d' i Service Areas e as 2 Excludetl from IFEE dl 2(ETJ) Excluded from IFEE IETJ) r 7$5 0 1 2 3_ t Miles ;. S FN J08 N0 SRZ1535fi 2017 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee , eArras,m:m GATE September s,l 7 6 SCALE 1:80,000 Traffic Analysis Zones Figure °RAFTS° Dare Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 12 6.0 TEN-YEAR GROWTH ASSUMPTIONS Projected growth has been characterized in two forms: population and employment. A series of assumptions were made to arrive at reasonable growth rates for population and employment. The following assumptions have been made as a basis from which ten -year projections could be initiated. • Future land uses will occur based on similar trends of the past and consistent with the Future Land Use Plan Map, • The city will be able to finance the necessary improvements to accommodate growth, • School facilities will accommodate increases in population, and • Densities will be as projected in the Sector Plans. The ten -year projections are based upon the 3.5 percent growth rate discussed earlier and considers past trends of the city. This rate corresponds with the historical average growth rate and the amount of growth expected over the next ten years. Table 4 details the ten -year population projection. Table 4. Year 2017 and 2027 Service Area Population and Dwelling Units Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 13 6.1 POPULATION 2027 The city has experienced steady growth over the past decade. The city's 2000 population stood at just over 18,000 residents. By the end of the decade, Schertz's population neared 32,000 in 2010 and a current 2017 estimate of 40,339. Although population estimates from the ETJ cannot be taken into account when calculating land use assumptions, the growing population within the ETJ should be monitored as the city plans its future. Using a 3.5 percent compound annual growth rate, the projected 2027 population for the city is 56,902 (Figure 7). Figure 7: Ten -Year Population Growth Projection Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 14 Table 5: Projected Dwelling Unit Estimations Avg. No. of Annual Permits: 581 Building permit calculations were derived using the U.S. Census information of 2.85 persons per household and base year population estimate. Between 2004 and 2014, the city issued an average of 377 building permits a year with the highest number of permits, 535, being issued in 2005 and the lowest number of permits, 254, issued in 2012. The city may average 581 new dwelling units a year over the next ten -year period (Table 5 and Figure 8). This average number is reflective of the type of construction which would likely occur based upon population projections and are accounting for both single - family and multi - family construction. Figure 8: Projected Dwelling Unit Estimations Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 15 An additional factor affecting overall population growth within Schertz is the construction of The Crossvine, a planned development in the southern sector of Schertz east of FM 1518. The master plan for this area includes between 2,300 and 2,400 single - family homes. The Crossvine Development The City has been reviewing its Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Plan in the area to the west of the Crossvine. This area is south of Randolph Air Force Base and is impacted by restrictions based on the Air Impact Compatible Use Zones (AICUZ) as outlined in the Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph Joint Land Use Study (JLUS). The recently updated JBSA Randolph JLUS recommends significantly reduced residential densities for this area. Additionally, a lack of sewer capacity and concerns about allowing septic systems on half acre lots will likely reduce densities in this area from what is designated on the Future Land Use Plan. As sewer capacity is provided to the area to the east of FM 1518 pressure for corresponding increases in densities will likely continue to be experienced. Continuing residential development pressure in the northern part of Schertz, along IH -35 as well as pressure along IH -35 from New Braunfels in the north will impact the distribution of development, resulting in population and employment growth, around the City. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 16 6.2 EMPLOYMENT 2027 Employment data for the year 2027 was based upon data provided by AAMPO and the City of Schertz. Data from AAMPO in the years 2025 and 2040 was used to interpolate the projected year 2027. The data was then adjusted to match growth rate and allocation expectations by the City. The 2027 employment by TAZ as listed in Table 6. It is important to note that TAZs do not follow city limits. City Staff input was received to verify employment assumptions in each TAZ regarding known or anticipated development to occur, projections of future land use needs and employee projections within each TAZ located within city limits. The employment numbers in Table 6 show the derived employment of each TAZ within Schertz's municipal boundary. Over 5,000 jobs are forecasted to be added to the city over the ten -year planning period and represents an increase of 45 percent. This increase corresponds to an annual growth rate of 3.8 percent. Table 6. 2025 Employment by Service Area Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 17 7.0 SUMMARY • The existing 2017 population for Schertz stands at approximately 40,339 persons, with an existing estimated employment of 11,201 jobs. • An average annual growth rate of 3.5 percent was used to calculate the Schertz ten -year growth projections. This growth rate is based upon the State Water Board Projections, the Parks Plan, City forecasts, historical U.S. Census data, as well as Building Permit information received from the City. • Ten -year (2027) population growth is forecasted to be 56,902 persons, with an employment of 16,247 jobs. Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 18 Table 7. Land Use Assumptions 2017 -2027 Summary Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 19 'Population Schertz Total 44;5 56,9f}2 16;a6 3.Si Service Area 1 9,239 12,211 2,972 2.8% Service Area 2 28,280 32,169 3,889 1.3% Service Area 3 2,809 12,454 9,645 16.1% Servi c Area 4 11 68 57 20.0% Dwelling Units; Schertz Total 14,407 24;322 Service Area 1 3,300 4,361 1,061 2.8% Service Area 2 10,100 11,489 1,389 1.3% Service Area 3 1,003 4,448 3,445 16.1% Service Area 4 4 24 20 20.0% Employment 5chertzTotal 11,201. 16,247 :5,046 3: Service Area 1 2,206 3,812 1,606 5.6% Basic 1,120 1,814 694 4.9% Reta i 1 468 785 317 5.3% Service 618 1,213 595 7.0% Servi ceArea 2 8,587 11,304 2,717 2.8% Basic 3,287 5,038 1,751 4.4% Reta i 1 2,449 2,996 547 2.0% Service 2,851 3,270 419 1.4% Servi ceArea 3 408 1,111 703 103% Basic 232 597 365 9.9% Reta i 1 108 340 232 12.2% Service 68 174 106 9.9% Servi c Area 4 0 20 20 Basic 0 0 0 - Reta i 1 0 0 0 - Service 0 20 20 - Land Use Assumptions Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 19 Roadway Impact Fee Study Land Use Assumptions Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 20 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN Prepared for: City of Schertz October 2017 Prepared by: FREESE AND NICHOLS, INC. 2711 North Haskell Avenue, Suite 3300 Dallas, Texas 75204 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... ............................... 2 1.1 Capital Improvements Plan Elements ............................................................. ..............................2 2.0 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................... ..............................3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS .................................................................................... ..............................4 4.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS ANALYSIS ....................................................................... ..............................4 4.1 Existing Volumes ..................................................................................................... ..............................6 4.2 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Capacity Supply .................................................... ............................... 6 4.3 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Demand ................................................................... ............................... 6 4.4 Vehicle -Miles of Existing Excess Capacity and Deficiencies .................. ............................... 7 5.0 GROWTH PROJECTIONS ........................................................................................... ..............................7 5.1 Projected Vehicle -Miles of New Demand ....................................................... ..............................9 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ......................................................................... ..............................9 6.1 Eligible Projects ..................................................................................................... .............................10 6.2 Eligible Costs ........................................................................................................... .............................10 6.3 Impact Fee CIP ........................................................................................................ .............................12 APPENDIX................................................................................................................................ .............................17 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code prescribes the process by which cities in Texas must formulate development impact fees. Legislative mandate requires that a capital improvements plan (CIP) be prepared that addresses long -term growth and that such plan be approved by the governing body prior to a public hearing for the consideration of imposing an impact fee. This report details the development of the impact fee CIP. As a funding mechanism for roadway improvements, impact fees allow cities to recover the costs associated with new facilities or expansions in order to serve future development. Legislatively, roadway impact fees may consider arterial and collector status roads on the City's official Master Thoroughfare Plan. Statutory requirements mandate that impact fees be based on a specific list of improvements identified in the program and only the cost attributed (and necessitated) by new growth over a ten -year period may be considered. As projects in the program are completed, planned costs are updated with actual costs to more accurately reflect the capital expenditure of the program. Additionally, new capital improvement projects may be added to the program. 1.1 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN ELEMENTS This report contains the following components: • Methodology - Explanation of the general methodology used to prepare the capital improvements plan. • Service Area Structure - Explanation and division of the City into impact fee service areas for roadway facilities. • Existing Conditions Analysis — Analysis of the existing roadway system; its carrying capacity, current utilization, and deficiencies. • Growth Projections— Development of growth projections to occur over the ten -year planning period by service area. • Capital Improvements Plan — Description of the capital improvements plan and costing. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 2 2.0 METHODOLOGY The impact fee capital improvements plan is predicated on community growth forecasted over a ten -year planning period. The Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Report, prepared as part of this study process, serves as the basis for the determination of "growth attributable to new development ". The LUA examines growth in terms of population and employment, and are based on recent trends the city has experienced since the early 2000s and reflect the changing dynamics of residential and non - residential growth in the city. Information contained in the report is based upon analysis of data from the U.S. Census, regional and local growth trends, housing permits and known /anticipated development from recent city approvals. These land use assumptions serve as a key component from which impact fees are calculated. For the formulation of the capital improvements plan, a series of work tasks were undertaken and are described below. 1. Meetings were held with City Staff to discuss impact fee methodology, project criteria and eligibility, and cost eligibility for consideration in the study. 2. Roadway service areas were developed to ensure conformity with legislative mandate, as well as amended to allow for city annexations. 3. Vehicle -miles of travel (VMT) in the PM peak hour was identified as the service unit of measure for analyses and impact fee calculations. 4. A roadway inventory was conducted to document lane geometrics, roadway functional classification, and system capacity. Traffic volume count data were collected in May 2015 to determine roadway utilization, and if any capacity deficiencies exist within each impact fee service area. Traffic volume counts were conducted at 30 locations throughout the city. 5. Projected 10 -year growth was calculated for service areas based on land use assumptions (projections of population and employment growth) and translated into residential, office, commercial and industrial VMT using service unit equivalencies. Trip rate data was obtained from Trip Generation, Ninth Edition by the Institute of Transportation Engineers, and trip length statistics for Schertz were obtained from the travel demand model used in the 2017 Schertz Master Thoroughfare Plan Study. 6. A capital improvements plan to address projected growth was developed and separated by service area. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 3 3.0 ROADWAY SERVICE AREAS Service areas are required by State Law to define an area to be served by impact fee capital improvements. Legislative requirements stipulate that roadway service areas be limited to a six -mile maximum and must be located within the current city limits. The result is that, for roadways, new development can only be assessed an impact fee based on the cost of necessary capital improvements within that service area and within city limits. A service area structure consisting of four zones has been developed for Schertz and correlates with the current corporate boundaries, as depicted in Figure 1. An inventory of major roadways that are designated as arterial and /or collector facilities on the Master Thoroughfare Plan was conducted to determine: 1) capacity provided by the existing roadway system, 2) the demand currently placed on the system, and 3) the potential existence of deficiencies on the system. Any deficiencies found to occur will be carried over in the impact fee calculations (netting out capacity made available by the CIP). Data for the inventory was obtained from the Master Thoroughfare Plan, field reconnaissance, and peak hour traffic volume count data. The roadways were divided into segments based on changes in lane configuration, major intersections, city limits or area development that may influence roadway characteristics. For the assessment of individual segments, lane capacities were assigned to each segment based on roadway functional class defined by the Master Thoroughfare Plan and type of existing cross - section, as listed in Table 1. Roadway hourly volume capacities are based on general carrying capacity values and reflect level -of- service (LOS) "D" operation based upon generally accepted capacities as defined in AAMPO planning references, which has been identified as the minimum acceptable traffic operational condition by cities. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 4 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 5 TABLE 1. ROADWAY FACILITY VEHICLE -MILE LANE CAPACITIES Divided Arterial* DA 675 Divided Collector* DC 550 Undivided Arterial UA 625 Undivided Collector UC 500 *Facilities with a two -way left turn lane (TWLTL) treated as a divided facility and marked with a Special Arterial (SA) or Special Collector (SC) designation. 4.1 EXISTING VOLUMES Existing directional PM peak hour volumes were obtained from automated traffic counts conducted in May 2015. Automated traffic counts at 30 separate locations were collected on major roadways throughout the city. In an effort to minimize the total number of counts, data was collected at locations where traffic volumes would typify link volumes on the major segments within the immediate area. For segments not counted, existing volumes were used or estimates were developed based on data from adjoining roadway counts. This data was compiled for roadway segments throughout the city and entered into the database for use in calculations. A summary of volumes by roadway segment is included in the Appendix A as part of the existing capital improvements database. V 1_ ► ''' " _ An analysis of the total capacity for each service area was performed. For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle -miles of capacity supplied were calculated using the following: Vehicle -Miles of Capacity = Link capacity per peak hour per lane x No. of Lanes x Length of segment (miles) A summary of the current capacity available on the roadway system by service area is detailed below. �CIt�I�l. l[ �11IduIIIf�Yllli� ►:1��IY1►�[!l17�luI:�►�17 The level of current usage in terms of vehicle -miles was calculated for each roadway segment. The vehicle- miles of existing demand were calculated by the following equation: Vehicle -Miles of Demand = PM peak hour volume x Length of segment (miles) The total vehicle -miles of demand by service area is also listed below. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 6 4.4 VEHICLE -MILES OF EXISTING EXCESS CAPACITY AND DEFICIENCIES For each roadway segment, the existing vehicle -miles of excess capacity and /or deficiencies were calculated and are listed in Table 2. Each direction was evaluated to determine if vehicle demands exceeded the available capacity. If demand exceeded capacity in one or both directions, the deficiency is deducted from the supply associated with the impact fee capital improvement plan. A summary of peak hour excess capacity and deficiencies is also shown in the table. Any deficiencies identified under current operations will be carried over to the impact fee calculation. A detailed listing of existing excess capacity and deficiencies by roadway segment is also located in the Appendix A. TABLE 2. PEAK HOUR VEHICLE -MILES OF EXISTING CAPACITY, DEMAND, EXCESS CAPACITY AND DEFICIENCIES 1 12,708 2,938 10,047 277 2 37,321 20,846 16,690 215 3 15,917 7,479 9,067 629 4 1,478 130 1,348 0 Total 67,424 31,393 37,151 1,121 5.0 GROWTH PROJECTIONS The projected growth for the roadway service area is represented by the increase in the number of new vehicle -miles of demand generated over the 10 -year planning period. The basis for the calculation of new demand is the population and employment projections that were prepared as part of the Schertz Land Use Assumptions (LUA) Report for Impact Fees dated October 2017 by Freese and Nichols with a growth rate approved by the Schertz CIAC on May 13, 2015. Estimates of population and employment were prepared for the years 2017 and 2027. Population data was provided in terms of the number of dwelling units and persons. Employment data was broken into three classes of employees that include basic, retail and service, comprising a variety of employment groupings. Basic employment generally encompasses the industrial and manufacturing uses; retail employment includes commercial and retail uses; and service employment generally encompasses government and office uses. A summary of the projected growth is summarized below. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 7 TABLE 3. PROJECTED 10 -YEAR DEMOGRAPHIC GROWTH SUMMARY � l I t� i 4� �I t• i t � t t t M i � at � 1 t Source: FNI; October 2017 Land Use Assumptions Report Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 8 5.1 PROJECTED VEHICLE -MILES OF NEW DEMAND Projected vehicle -miles of demand were calculated based on the net growth expected to occur over the 10 -year planning period, and on the associated service unit generation for each of the population and employment data components (basic, service and retail). Separate calculations were performed for each data component and were then aggregated for each service area. Vehicle -miles of demand for population growth were based on dwelling units (residential). Vehicle -miles of demand for employment were based on the number of employees, and then converted to square footage of building space using estimates of square footage per employee for industrial, office and retail uses. The 10 -year projected vehicle -miles of demand by service area are summarized in Table 4. The Appendix B details the derivation of the projected demand calculations. TABLE 4. 10 -YEAR PROTECTED SERVICE UNITS OF DEMAND 1 10,461 2 17,905 3 14,918 4 124 Total 43,408 6.0 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN The impact fee CIP is aimed at facilitating long -term growth in Schertz. The City has identified the City- funded transportation projects needed to accommodate the projected growth within the City. The CIP for Roadway Impact Fees is made up of: • Recently completed projects with excess capacity available to serve new growth; • Projects currently under construction; and • Remaining projects needed to complete the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan. All arterial and collector facilities in the currently adopted Master Thoroughfare Plan not to the ultimate build -out were included in the impact fee CIP to provide flexibility in the development of the community due to currently rapid rates of development. The only exception is the FM 3009 extension which was excluded due to the high cost and undetermined scope and timing of the project. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 9 Subsequent to this report on the development of the impact fee CIP, the final report will detail project cost per service unit, the cost attributable to new development, and service area cost per service unit. 6.1 ELIGIBLE PROJECTS Legislative mandate stipulates that the impact fee CIP contain only those roadways which are included on the City's official Master Thoroughfare Plan that are classified as arterial or collector status facilities. Impact fee legislation also allows for the recoupment of costs for previously constructed facilities and projects currently under construction; however, after consideration, none of the projects were included for recoupment. All of these projects conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan requirements and will consider only the costs incurred by the City for facility implementation. 6.2 ELIGIBLE COSTS In general, those costs associated with the design, right -of -way acquisition, and construction and financing of all items necessary to implement the roadway projects identified in the capital improvements plan are eligible. These estimates are based on the ultimate roadway section identified by functional classification in the 2017 Master Thoroughfare Plan Report with an excerpt of these assumed sections in the Appendix E. It is important to note that upon completion of the capital improvements identified in the CIP, the city must recalculate the impact fee using the actual costs and make refunds if the actual cost is less than the impact fee paid by greater than 10 percent. To prevent this situation, conservative (low) estimates of project cost are considered. Chapter 395.012 identifies roadway costs eligible for impact fee recovery. The law states that: "An impact fee may be imposed only to pay the cost of constructing capital improvements for facility expansions, including and limited to the construction contract price, surveying and engineering fees, land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney fees, and expert witness fees; and fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision." "Projected interest charges and other finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 10 to reimburse bond funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan." The following details the individual cost components of the impact fee CIP. Construction: Construction costs include those costs which are normally associated with construction, including: paving, dirt work (including sub -grade preparation, embankment fill and excavation), clearing and grubbing, retaining walls or other slope protection measures, and general drainage items which are necessary in order to build the roadway and allow the roadway to fulfill its vehicle carrying capability. Individual items may include; bridges, culverts, inlets and storm sewers, junction boxes, manholes, curbs and /or gutters, and channel linings and other erosion protection appurtenances. Other items included in cost estimates may include: sidewalks, traffic control devices at select locations (initial cost only), ancillary adjustments to existing utilities, and minimal sodding /landscaping. Engineering: These are the costs associated with the design and surveying necessary to construct the roadway. Because the law specifically references fees, it has generally been understood that in -house City design and surveying cannot be included. Only those services that are contracted out can be included and it may be necessary to use outside design and surveying firms to perform the work. For planned projects, a percentage based on typical engineering contracts was used to estimate these fees. Right -of -Way: Any land acquisition cost estimated to be necessary to construct a roadway can be included in the cost estimate. For planning purposes, only the additional amount of land needed to bring a roadway right -of -way to thoroughfare standard was considered. For example, if a 120' right -of -way for an arterial road was needed and 80' of right -of -way currently existed, only 40' would be considered in the acquisition cost. The cost for right -of -way may vary based on location of project and will be based on data from the most current County Appraisal District data. Debt Service: Predicted interest charges and finance costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principle and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by the city to finance capital improvements identified in the impact fee capital improvements plans. They cannot be used to reimburse bond funds for Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 11 other facilities. This cost will be determined through a Finance Study and incorporated in the final impact fee cost per service unit calculation. Previous Assessments: The cost for any previous assessments collected by the City on projects identified on the impact fee CIP must be removed from program consideration. As this is a new impact fee program, there are no previous assessments to consider in the initial calculation. Study Updates: The fees paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision can be included in the impact fees. Only the cost necessitated by new development will be considered for impact fee consideration. For example, if only 60% of the capacity provided by the impact fee CIP is needed over the ten -year window, then only 60% of the cost associated with those facilities will be considered. This can be seen in Service Area 1 as another example, where net capacity supplied by the CIP is 42,189 vehicle -miles (Table 5) while the projected demand is 10,461 vehicle -miles (Table 4). Therefore, only the portion of cost attributed to the projected demand, 24.8 percent, is considered in the impact fee cost per service unit calculation in the next phase of the study's Impact Fee Report. This calculation is shown for each service area in Table 6. 6.3 IMPACT FEE CIP The proposed CIP consists of 71 project segments over the four service areas and entail the buildout of the full Master Thoroughfare Plan network, as seen in Figure 2. By including the full network, there is flexibility in the impact fee program funds to adapt to development needs and ensure credit is given to developers building thoroughfare roadways. The capacity and net capacity provided by the proposed CIP is summarized below in Table S. Net capacity provided by the proposed CIP takes into consideration current traffic on CIP roads and any deficiencies from the existing conditions analysis described in Section 4 of this report. A detailed listing by project of capacity supplied can be found in the Appendix C. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 12 TABLE 5. CAPACITY AND NET CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE PROPOSED CIP 1 45,213 2,747 42,466 277 42,189 2 25,210 6,998 18,212 215 17,996 3 46,511 7,305 39,206 629 38,577 4 3,359 130 3,229 0 3,229 Total 120,292 17,181 103,111 1,121 101,991 A comparison of net capacity provided by the proposed CIP relative to 10 -year needs (developed in Section 5) is listed below in Table 6. An analysis reveals an adequately matched overall impact fee CIP program to address growth attributable to new development. TABLE 6. PROJECTED DEMAND AND NET CAPACITY PROVIDED BY THE PROPOSED CIP Project costs were developed based on unit cost estimates compiled by Freese and Nichols. Individual project costs were developed for engineering, right -of -way, and construction, as found in the Appendix D. Each roadway segment uses the Master Thoroughfare Plan's defined functional classification to determine the ultimate roadway standard for each link. Additionally, impact fee study update costs were attributed to the project costs. For recently completed projects, actual costs must be input to meet legislative mandates, but no completed projects were included in this initial impact fee program. The cost for the preliminary IFCIP program totals approximately $228.9 million, excluding debt service. Debt service costs will be determined in the Finance Study as part of the cost per service unit calculation analysis. Figure 2 and Table 7 illustrate and list the capital improvement projects and their associated total cost for the impact fee program. Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 13 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 14 Sery Area Project No. Roadway From TO Project Status Length (m it No. Of Type Lanes Rdwy Thoroughfare Plan Description Pot. in Serv. Area Total Project Cost I I FM 2252 IH 35 FM 482 New 0.32 4 DA Principe] Arterial 100% $1,566,800 1 2 FM 2252 DO 482 Railroad Tracks New 0,64 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,146,000 IV( 3 FM 2252 Railroad Tracks N City Limits New 0.22 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $509,850 112 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $3,202,650 1 5 E/W Connector (1) NIS Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $5,513,000 1 6 E/W Connector (2) NIS Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $4,269,000 1 7 Fly 482 FIN 2252 Hubertus Rd New 1.05 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,456,100 1 8 FM 482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks New 1.00 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,147,800 1 9 FM 482 800' W of Fresenhahn Friesereahn Ln New 0.15 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $754,100 I/X 10 FM 482 Fresenharin Ln Schwab Rd New 0.59 4 DA Principal Arterial 50% $1,530,000 1 11 FM 482 Schwab Rd E City Limits New 1.20 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $6,205,500 1 12 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.57 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $2,855,700 1 13 Hubertus Rd FM 482 IN City Limits New 0.30 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $1,572,300 1 14 Fnesenhahn Ln D 35 FM 482 New 0.72 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,343,600 1 15 Schwab Rd 1H 35 FIN 482 New 0.63 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $4,374,700 1 16 E/W Connector (3) Hubertus Rd David Lack Blad New 1.59 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $6,110,000 1 17 Eckhardt Rd Froboese Ln Green Valley Rd New 1.11 2 DO Residential Collector 100% $3,727,100 1 18 Schwab Rd IH 35 S City Limits New 1.14 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $5,680,700 1 19 Froboese Ln Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0,57 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $2,030,400 1 20 Froboese Ln 2200'E of Eckhardt E City Limits New 0,26 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $890,000 1 21 Green Valley Rd W City Limits E City Limits New 0.87 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,199,500 1 22 Homestead Pkwy End Ex Homestead Pkwy S City Limits New 0.33 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,178,500 1 23 Country Club Blwl Scenic Links S City Limits New 0.35 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,257,100 1 24 E/W Connector (4) Country Club BlwJ Homestead Pkwy New 0.77 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $2,671,200 1 25 E/W Connector (4) Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.45 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $1,602,000 1 26 FIN 1103 11135 Old Wiederstain Rd New 0.70 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $2,000,000 1 27 NIS Connector (1) D 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $2,667,000 1 28 NIS Connector (2) IH 35 Old Waderstem Rd New 0.73 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,635,700 1 29 E/W Connector (5) N/S Connector (1) FM 1103 New 2.00 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $7,097,200 I/X 30 Old Guederstein Rd N/S Connector (1) Cherry Of New 2.17 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $5,143,600 Sub-total SA 1 24.22 $97,337,100 2 31 Doerr Ln N City Limits Lookout Rd New 0.91 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $3,249,900 2/1 4 NIS Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $3,130,900 2 32 E/W Connector (2) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $3,386,200 2 33 E/W Connector (6) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 2 LIC Commercial Collector B 100% $3,386,100 2 34 Mid-Cities Pkwy D 35 FM 3009 New 0.98 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $3,293,700 2 35 E/W Connector (1) FM 3009 NIS Connector (1) New 0.81 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,190,900 2 36 E/W Connector (7) W City Limits Doerr Ln New 0.65 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $2,231,100 2 37 Lookout Rd Tri-County Pkwy Schanz Pkwy New 0.74 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $2,743,600 2 38 Four Oaks Ln End of Ex .Four Oaks Ln NIS Connector (1) New 0.54 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,977,300 2 39 Wrederstren Rd E City Limits FM 3009 New 0.64 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $3,079,800 2 40 Wiederstep Rd Schertz Pkwy IN City Limits New 0.41 2 DO Residential Collector 100% $1,294,700 2 41 Baptist Health Dr Ripps-Kreusler Wiederstem Rd New 0.27 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $992,900 2 42 Ripps-Kreusler Baptist Health Dr End of Rippe Kreurser New 0.22 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $803,900 2 43 Maske Rd FIN 1518 Oak St New 0.54 3 SO Commercial Collector A 100% $1,827,600 2 44 Masks Rd Realignment Oak St Schertz Pkwy New 0.88 2 LIC Residential Collector 100% $3,645,200 2 45 FM 1518/Mad St Maske Rd Oak St New 1.30 3 SA Secondary Arterial 100% $4,494,500 2 46 FM 1518 N City Limits SA 3 Limit New 0.36 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $436,300 2/3 47 FIR 1518 SA 3 Limit Schanz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA Principal Arterial 50% $222,650 2 48 FM 78/John Peterson Blvd VY-CIN Imits a-L- -Its E-CA W-W-M New 1.81 6 DA Precool Arterial 100% $2,683,780 Sub-total SA 2 14.34 $47,071,030 Capital Improvements Plan Roadway Impact Fee Study Freese and Nichols, Inc. Page 15 TABLE 7. IMPACT FEE CIP LISTING (CONTINUED) Sew Area Project No. Roadway From To Project Status Length (m f) No. of Type Lanes Rdwy Thoroughfare Plan Description Pct. in Sew. Area Total Project Cost 3/2 47 FM 1518 SA 2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA Principal Arterial 50% $222,650 3 49 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext. IH 10 New 4.09 6 DA Principal Arterial 100% $5,165,000 3 50 Schaefer Rd W City Limits FM 1518 New 0.48 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $1,536,700 3/X 51 RAF - Bumette Schaefer Rd E City Limits New 0.55 4 DA Secondary Arterial 50% $1,279,500 3/X 52 Lower Seguin Rd W City limits E of Tates Dr New 0.35 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $686,450 3 53 Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Or W of Canopy Bend New 1.76 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $6,998,900 3 54 Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.72 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $7,860,400 3 55 N/S Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.15 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $764,000 3 56 NIS Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.27 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $1,380,400 3 57 NIS Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.26 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $894,600 3 58 NIS Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.21 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $725,000 3/X 59 W Ware Seguin Rd W City Limits Boeing Dr New 0.57 2 UC Residential Collector 50% $900,550 3 60 W Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Dr NIS Connector (5) New 0.67 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $2,236,900 3 61 NIS Connector (5) Lower Seguin Rd W Ware Seguin Rd New 1.10 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $3,780,500 3 62 N/S Connector (5) W Ware Seguin Rd E Ware Seguin Rd New 0.93 2 UC Residential Collector 100% $3,227,400 3 63 Trainer Hale Rd (NIS) Weir Rd IH 10 New 1.66 4 DA Principal Arterial 100% $8,020,500 3 64 Trainer Hale Rd (E /W) FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd (NIS) New 1.51 4 DA Secondary Arterial 100% $7,710,300 3 65 Ware Seguin Rd Graytown Rd NIS Connector (5) New 135 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,736,300 3 66 E Ware Seguin Rd NIS Connector (5) FM 1518 New 1.41 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,739,900 3/4 67 Graybwn Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $2,000,600 3 68 NIS Connector (6) Ware Seguin Rd lH 10 New 0.47 3 SC Commercial Collector 100% $1,712,600 3 69 E/W Connector 3) IH 10 E City Limits New 2.33 3 SC Commercial Collector 100% $8482300 Sub -total SA 3 23.33 $75,061,450 4/3 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr 11110 New 1.11 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 50% $2,000,600 4 70 Binz - Engleman Rd W City limits Graytown Rd New 1.30 3 SA Secondary Rural Arterial 100% $4,667,000 4 71 Scenic Lake Dr Binz- Engleman Rd IH 10 New 0.77 3 SC Commercial Collector A 100% $2.777,400 Sub -total SA 4 3.19 $9,445,000 Totals: 65.08 ( $228,914,580 Totals: Engineering Cost Right -of -Way Cost Construction Cost $14,149,150 $10,633,600 ,204,131.830 TOTAL NET COST $228,914,580 Future Impact Fee Update Cost' $100,000 TOTAL IMPLEMENTATION COST $229,014,580 Notes: DA- DiNded arterial Recoup- Recoupment Project SA- Special arterial (with two way left turn lane) New - New Project SC- Special collector (with two way left turn lane) ' Cost for (2) 5 year updates UC- Undivided collector `/X indcates roadway half in /half out of City Limits indicates roadway split between two seMce areas Capital Improvements Plan Freese and Nichols, Inc. Roadway Impact Fee Study Page 16 APPENDIX Appendix A: Existing Conditions Analysis Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Existing Capital Improvements Analysis Total 56.57 67,424 31,393 37,151 1,121 Notes: DA- Divided arterial Direction A= Northbound or Eastbound UA- Undivided arterial Direction B = Southbound or Westbound SA- Special arterial with dual -left turn lane '/X indcates roadway half in /half out of City Limits DC- Divded collector *1* indicates roadway split between two service areas UC- Undivided collector A B C D Ax BxC AxD So, Length No. of Lane Pct. in Peak Hour Volume VMT Supply VIAL Demand Total VMT Total VMT - Area Roadway From To mei) Lanes Type CapacityServ. Area A B Total Pk Hr Total Fir Fir Total Excess Capacity Deficiency '. 1 FM 2252 IH 35 Railroad Tracks 0.87 2 UA 625 100% 73 250 323 :1084 -280 `. 804 0`' 1!X FM 2252 Railroad Tracks NCity Limits 0.22 2 UA 625 50% 0 250 250 138 ' 55 83 05 1 FM482 FM 2252 Hubertus Rd 1.05 2 UA 625 100% 46 52 98 .1315 '. 103 : 1212 0- 1 FM482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks 1,00 2 UA 625 1001 46 52 98 -1252 ' 98 1154 0' 1 FM482 Railroad Tracks Friesenhahn Ln 0.18 2 UA 625 100% 46 52 98 -222 17 204 0:: 1/X FM482 Friesenhahn Lo ECity Limits 0.59 2 UA 625 50% 46 0 46 -369 - 27 342 0' 1 Hubertus Rd 11135 FM482 0.57 2 UA 625 100% 30 57 87 1708 49 659 0': 1 Friesenhahn Ln IH 35 FM482 0.72 2 UC 500 100% 50 50 100 717 `: 72 ' 645 0.' 1 Schwab Rd IH 35 Railroad Tracks 0.53 3 S 675 100% 120 315 435 3721 -232 < 489 0: 1 Eckhardt Rd I1135 SCity Limits 1.17 2 UA 625 100% 19 11 30 1466 35 - 1431 0' 1 Schwab Rd IH 35 End of Schwab Rd 0.36 2 UA 625 100% 3 2 5 '454 2 452 0' 1 Country Club Blvd IH 35 Northcliffe Golf Club 046 2 DC 550 100% 50 50 100 507 46 461 0( 1 Country Club Blvd Northcliffe Golf Club End of Ex Country Club l 039 2 DC Y 550 100% 50 50 100 .'434 39 395 0 1 FM 1103 IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.70 2 UA 625 100 590 1020 1610 ' 877 `.'1129 25 277 - 1 Belmont Pkwy IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.74 2 UC 500 100% 20 20 40 >739 'S 30 710 0.. 1/X Old Wiederstein Rd Cibolo Valley Dr Cherry Tree Or 2.17 2 UA 625 50% 0 177 177 .:1356 384 972 0- 1/X Wlederestein Rd IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd 0.56 2 UA 625 50% 607 0 607 -:348 - 338 10 0.. Sub -Total 12.29 12,708 2,938 10,047 277: 2 FM 3009 NCity Limits IH 35 1.62 4 D 675 100% 1010 900 1910 4368 :3090 1278 0- 2 Doerr Ln Bell N Dr Lookout Rd 0.91 2 UC 500 100% 50 50 100 5:913 >: 91 ? 822 0= 2 Lookout Rd Doerr Lo Schertz Pkwy 0.62 2 UC 500 100% 133 219 352 623 219 404 0:: 2 Four Oaks Ln FM 3009 End of Four Oaks Ln 0.33 2 UC 500 100% 20 20 40 .328 13 315 0: 21X Schertz Pkwy Lookout Rd N of IH 35 0.51 2 UA 625 50% 50 0 50 <321 26 295 0.. 2 Schertz Pkwy Nof IH 35 IH 35 0.23 2 UA 625 100% 50 50 100 290 'I 23 ' 267 0 ". 2 Schanz Pkwy IH 35 FM78 /John Peterson BI 314 4 DA 675 100% 712 753 1465 '8471 '4596 3875 0.: 2 FM 3009 IH 35 S of Woodland Oaks Or 1.53 5 SA 675 100 869 980 1849 4129 2828 1301 0- 2/X FM 3009 S of Woodland Oaks Dr Live Oak Rd 047 5 SA 675 50% 0 980 980 640 '..: 465 : 175 0- 2 FM 3009 Live Oak Rd FM78 /John Peterson BI 116 5 SA 675 100% 869 980 1849 3124 .2140 985 0- 2 Wiederstein Rd FM 3009 WCity Lim its 145 2 UC 500 100% 100 100 200 P.1449 ;290 1159 0 2 Savannah Dr Scheriz Pkwy WCity Limits 0.90 2 UC 500 100% 50 50 100 f905 90 = 814 0': 2 Live Oak Rd Schertz Pkwy FM 3009 0.86 2 UC 500 100% 100 100 200 ::858 172 686 0P 2 Masks Rd FM 1518 Schanz Pkwy 1.23 2 UC 500 100% 97 105 202 1225 247 978 0': 2 Borgfeld Rd FM 3009 ECity Lim its 043 4 U 500 100% 509 423 932 '859 :400 :. 459 0., 2 FM 1518 /Main St Masks Rd Oak St 1.30 2 UA 625 100% 397 351 748 '1623 971 = 652 0`: 2 FM 1518 /Main St Oak St Aviation Blvd 0.24 4 UA 625 100% 351 397 748 :'600 - 179 420 0: 2 FM 1518/M in St Aviation Blvd FM78 /John Peterson BI 0.29 2 UA 625 100% 351 397 748 '366 219 147 0 2 FM 1518 NCity Lim its SA3 Lim it 0.36 2 UA 625 100% 755 508 1263 1452 -457 42 47< 213 FM 1518 SA3 Limit Schanz Pkwy EM, 0.39 2 UA 625 50% 755 0 755 :245 :'296 0 51` 2 Aviation Blvd WCity Limits FM 1518 0.53 2 UA 625 100% 613 438 1051 : 659 554 105 0' 2 FM 78 /John Peterson BI Cibolo Creek Schertz Pkwy 0.67 5 SA 675 100% 1525 1096 2621 1809 ::1756 170 117`. 2 FM78 /John Peterson Bl Schertz Pkwv ECity Limits 1.14 5 S 675 100% 998 520 1518 ':3065 '1723 - 1342 0: Sub -Total 20.31 37;321 20,846 46,690 215? 3/2 FM 1518 SA2 Limit Schanz Pkwy Ext. 0.39 2 UA 625 50% 0 508 508 245 4199 46 0 3 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy ExL Lower Seguin Rd 1.31 2 UA 625 100% 755 508 1263 :.1638 :1655 153 170 -: 3 FM 1518 Lower Seguin Rd Trainer Hale Rd 1.93 2 UA 625 100% 790 538 1328 2417 <2568 168 319' 3 FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd IH 10 0.85 2 UA 625 100% 790 538 1328 . 1057 '1123 74 139? 3 Schaefer Rd W End of Schaefer E of FM 1518 0.48 2 UC 500 100% 100 100 200 '478 - 96 383 0`: 31X Schaefer Rd Eof FM 1518 ECity Limits 0.55 2 UC 500 50% 100 0 100 .!277 :' 55 222 0'. 3/X Schaefer Rd WCity Limits RAF - Burnette 0.14 2 UC 500 50% 100 0 100 69 '- 14 55 0:! 3/X RAF - Burnett. Schaefer Rd ECity Limits 0.56 2 UC 500 50% 50 0 50 "278 28 : 250 0' 3/X Lower Seguin Rd WCity Limits Eof Tates Or 0.35 2 U 500 50% 304 0 304 '175 ?107 69 0. 3/X Lower Seguin Rd Eof Tates Dr FM 1518 2.27 2 UC 500 50% 304 188 492 2272 71118 - 1154 0:: 3 Lower Seguin Rd FM 1518 ECity Limits 178 2 UC 500 100% 37 16 53 '.1783 94 1688 0'. 3 Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Or E -S Bend in Ware Segu 0.71 2 UA 625 100% 19 20 39 11884 ? 28 857 0. 3 Ware Seguin Rd E -S Bend in Ware Seguin R S -E Bend in Ware Segu 0.92 2 UC 500 100% 20 19 39 '916 36 : 881 0' 3 Ware Seguin Rd S -E Bend in Ware Seguin R FM 1518 1,41 2 UC 500 100% 20 19 39 1412 - 55 `: 1357 0- 314 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 1,11 2 UA 625 50% 238 0 238 >: 697 265 431 0.' 3 Pfeil Rd Ware Seguin Rd IH 10 1.32 2 UC 500 100 % 22 8 30 ' 1319 S 40 < 1279 0 . Sub -Total 16.08 15,917 7,479 79,067 529 413 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 1.11 2 UA 625 501 0 89 89 697 99 597 0- 4 Scenic Lake Dr Boeing Dr IH 10 0.78 2 UC 500 100% 20 20 40 781 ' 31 : 750 0!! Sub -Total 1.90 1,478 130 -1,348 0`; Total 56.57 67,424 31,393 37,151 1,121 Notes: DA- Divided arterial Direction A= Northbound or Eastbound UA- Undivided arterial Direction B = Southbound or Westbound SA- Special arterial with dual -left turn lane '/X indcates roadway half in /half out of City Limits DC- Divded collector *1* indicates roadway split between two service areas UC- Undivided collector Appendix B: Projected 10 -Year Growth (Vehicle -Miles of New Demand) Vehicle -Mile Trip Generation by Service Area, Schertz Impact Fee Based on September 2017 land Use Assumptions by FNI Fstimated Pe.,ide.wiai nm4h Vehicle -M'le Tdn (' na Linn SerNce Area Added Dwelling Units Vehicle -Miles per DU Total Vehicle -Miles 1 1,061 3.37 3,576 2 1,389 3.37 4,681 3 3,445 3.37 11,610 4 20 3.37 67 Estimated Basic Emulnvment Growth Vhirle -Mile Generation (1.500 SF/emnlnvee) Service Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000fSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 694 1,500 1,041,000 170 3,852 2 1,751 1,500 2,626,500 3.70 9,718 3 365 1,500 547,500 170 2,026 4 0 1,500 0 3.70 0 Fstimated .4enrire Fmnlnvmant ('-4h Vahirla -Mile Genaratinn 1500 SF1P.- Invee) SerNce Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000lSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 595 500 297,500 5.69 1,693 2 419 500 209,500 5.69 1,192 3 106 500 53,000 5.69 302 4 20 500 10,000 5.69 57 Fstimated Retail Fmnlnvmant (gym h Vahicla-Mila Renaratinn 11 non RF /amn1rni ) SerNce Area Added Employees Square Feet per em p. Total S uare Feet Vehicle -Miles Per 1000fSF Total Vehicle -Miles 1 317 1,000 317,000 4.23 1,341 2 547 1,000 547,000 4.23 2,314 3 232 1,000 232,000 4.23 981 4 0 1,000 0 4.23 0 Vehicle -mile Generation Summary SeNlce Area Residential Growth Vehicle -Miles Basic Growth Vehicle -Miles Service Growth Vehicle -Miles Retail Growth Vehicle -Miles -- Total -- Growth Vehicle- Miles' 1 3,576 3,852 1,693 1,341 - -- 10,461 - 2 4,681 9,718 1,192 2,314 17,905- 3 11,610 2,026 302 981 -- .14,918- 4 67 0 57 0 -------- -124 - Totals 19,934 15,596 3,243 4,636 - - - -- 43,408 - SUEquivalency Residential DU 3.37 Basic Employ SF 3.70 Service Employ SF 5.69 Retail Employ SF 4.23 Appendix C: Roadway Capital Improvements Plan ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS PLAN PROJECTS Definitions LANES The total number of lanes in both directions available for travel. TYPE The type of roadway (used in determining capacity): DA = divided arterial UA = undivided arterial SA = special arterial (arterial with continuous left turn) DC = divided collector UC = undivided collector SC = special collector (arterial with continuous left turn) PK -HR VOLUME The existing volumes of cars on the roadway segment traveling during the afternoon (P.M.) peak hour of travel. IN SERVICE AREA If the roadway is located on the boundary of the service area (with the city limits running along the centerline of the roadway), then half of the roadway is inventoried in the service area and the other half is not. This value is either 50% or 100 %. VEH -MI SUPPLY The number of total service units (vehicle - miles) supplied within PK -HR TOTAL the service area, based on the length and established capacity of the roadway type. VEH -MI TOTAL The total service unit (vehicle -mile) demand created by DEMAND PK -HR existing traffic on the roadway segment in the afternoon peak hour. EXCESS CAPACITY The number of service units supplied but unused by PK -HR VEH -MI existing traffic in the afternoon peak hour. CIP VEH -MI The number of service units used by existing traffic in excess of DEFICIENCY the available service units supplied by the roadway in the afternoon peak hour. � o o o 0 0 00 0 0...0 0 00 0 00 0 0 o 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 of o 0 0 00 0 00 0 o a - U r V) 2 NO (9 O O O W W 'O M1 V O' m 0 O 0 O N O O MI F O O O O O O O t«6 N V N r d@ VI N M M O N 0 O O V N M 'M OM I M ' .O � .N W Q . M O O m V N o V . h . O . h m W O O . m 9. F W h NcO N O.N N V h M� W N'h O N MN MM h V.M V W O> N H 'O <p M M O N h M U5 r r S � 2 M M O O O O M M W (O N F O O N O O O O O O O O O O O O O O h 00 O O O O O O O E F-o = m N Q N N M Q d O d c4 ?D f9 t9 iQ 6 0 4 4 0 61 d Q d O O 4 d Q d d O d 4 4 4 0 0 0 0 4 M O 0 0 o N o a M - N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cn ¢ Q ¢ w m ¢ ¢ Q ¢ m@ m m o o O o m °° m °° O° m m° m O m O O O m o o o N 5 . m o c c c C a U o U..' .ga9J .o .o N ,o N N N 'C 'C _ d N Lo,. N N N N N A < o o Q o o o o 'C Q Q O ¢ O ¢ O o o Q o o 4 '�' U U U U U U¢ U U .`, U U U I U U U 'a u m a m R a m iu m m is m m m m m m m �t m m o m m m 'm m m m F, m m o m m E sa m m m N C G o C G (} G U U U C C C G is G C C p ❑ a o 0 0 Q1 C C c C c E = E a o 5 a o a a 'oo ._ o o -aa' o 0 o N N N o N N N ° av a"i aoi w a a` a` a` o. a`. a a oai m a"i - a c w ooi E- E E E- E E E cn v> u> zn E E E v> m v ta w m m v u5 v) m w E yr E E E va E E E o ° o a cc o a o v ° o as °J : d d d d d U d d d d Q d d U d U U d U U d U U U U d d d U Q U Q U U U Q U U U o � 2 J M (p N N d) O> O La N c) z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z a .E .E x .E .E .E .E .E tY m h c c c Ci c f= -o a o o J N o o o U 2 U Y U U U U o s a@ to U o r va F tL fl' z CC LL LL Z fr Li. N W fE_ z 1L LL❑ ii w W W w w w Z W 0 0 0 LL U J CC Z Z iA_ Z❑ u) Z J a a � o m o O � GSi X C aai aai z ii � z J Rs n aai N N O 4 M C O C N N 9 W C J 0 6 4 T w M W N N V��' Ip O o sn v° srs U U cNV v °' z cn v �n v> o a u5 s W `c U U o 0 o a o o M M rn v5 °o c u M M cn a M o° U c cai o u m M M U t/> U M 2 2 M� LL LL z z !.i. Z LL rn ?? S LL � N w vt U uJ ? z z z LL LL Z I.I_ F w O O O O EL o o p o O S O O U CS 'O 'O a -O C C T S] U U Q O 'a, U U tJ U J T N N N C !t! G 41 0 fS U G G M C O C G C r G N tt1 w t(? C o o N N N N N C C A O m .O .> C? a C 3 N N N U U U a. m w �' 3 U 3 0 0 w �' U U ° U U U ;,7,0`. �' i j Ua U U CJ C3 0 0 s s w s o o m o o °a '> `'> 0 0 K I LL. IL z w w IL LL LL L Z Z tL V1 W w u) LL LL 0 Z U W W W z z w O ❑ z W w W W m1 LL .O .° d' u7 CR r a2 O O - .- N m e- N X N X X' o � ,- •- .`- ,- •- •- ,- •- •- .`- •- ,- �- •- ,- ,- •- ,- •- •- •- •- •- •- •- •- - •- N O ri of o......0 o o o o o o o . o . . o . . o o ....o o o 75 -Ta -cz -c5 �5 -c -c5 -c < 0 0 0 0 a a¢¢ a¢ 0 < Q¢ 0 0 0 0 0 0 < < so O. L 2 . Q Q. -p -p 2- E- .2- E E E 0- a`. 0- E E E E E !Y o o cr [2 w CK w Of E E o 0 to a) < < < < < < < oO � M M . O. N N N chD � Iq M 't MI M 3 3 z z z z z z z z z zl z z zo z z z zo z z z z z z z z z z z z z z ZI z z z x -0 LU tis 0 a. I Q. U) T D W, o U) 0 V) U) .1 U) w Cl) w w co co (n U) m z 3� z I za O LU E X t z, z, < C) U) R m 0. 2, oz U<) U) w z z z z 0 z 0 CL N 0 0 0 & o E & mu U) co of vo) V) U) c fn ai c W Q 0 0 C) U) U) co U) w U) U) a5 w Q U) U) m I X x W-1 O Appendix D: Roadway Improvement Plan Cost Analysis 8 3 s 2 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 s 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 8 o g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 O q q m 15 15 16 Ill 16 14 4 16 1� - <O 14 4 14 c4 14 li 1: 1� 15 13 ll� 15 �7 Ill 14 -7 a - - - - - - - - - - - w 0 8 8 8 2 8 8 8 8 8 s 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 2 8 8 °° 8 8 8 8 8 o0 c� �q cD (D n cD q cl� �q n N N oa v� cr� N (q q in v� n "I oO N cR � cl� IQ IQ M �q 13� 1� testa ,4 c\i 4 1 1 - N N - - "i 6 1 D - - - - - o; a -1 e; 2 a a -1 11; 2 71 v; -" ;; -1 -" - - . - - -" -I I 0 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . °O . . . . . . . . . 0 -D q Iq 10 q 1� �D CO q 1� LO q 0? ° N q ml LO P� N 1� ct 0 0 �� o 0 0 0 0 � o ° o 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °F9 0 0 0 � N o � o 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lo 4 an � di ro 75 a -�a -F� -6 — — — — — - m m m t -ra g- cL 't 't 't, T� 1� oo < —o —o - — — o < < < < < o o o o < < o < < < < < < < < < < -m -F� -Fo -Fo 76 co -F, -�6 7� 'F� -Z6 -�a --�a -za 'ffi le -ffi 16 76 16 �a 21 2- S., .2- 2 2 2 2 �2 o E E 2o ct E clt tt ct c� L �t E ol E E E E E E E U3 u) co u) E o- E E u) u) u) E u) E E E u) E E E o o In u, c� cf c� o o o o o o < < < < < U < < < < < < < U Q U U Q U U Q U U U U < < < U < U < Z I N O o O . . O. . . . . . O. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 c5 6 ('i N l 6 0 6 0 0 . . . . . . . . . . z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z 0 o o 2 2 2 z- Z` z w U) 0 Q U) Lu I Lu U) w m w 0 0 0 z z z 0' 9') z I C c N tab 10 10 N w N LU 'T' U) T 'N �: tit U') 0, Z5 >z m Z5 b Z5 6 6 i2 2 2 2c m o o 0 0 0 Q o 0 o u E ��E 2'R :�R :2 2 if - . I L. 2 z I w Z w w :f :f (D 3: 0 w w z z w 0 ❑ �2 :1 ,2 �2 t2 — .- — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — O. o o O 8 8 8 .1 1. .1 1. 1. 1. 1. 1. .1 1. 1. 1. OM NO V 1. .1 .1 1 1. V Na 1. yy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . O .0 �: cl� ll� 0 1� Iq IQ MO clz 00 11 O -i q N N N M N q q 1: M Ffi 14 C6 14 1 vs U -D ID cD 1� Iz c� -D �q 10 cD Iq cli m ll� D c6 q O 14 4 11: ll� ml m �T o F. Lu in m 75 75 75 m Q Q 76 m < �5 �3 'Fo m 75 c, -m 6 �t' m m t z -6 z _ °a < 0 0 0 < o 0 < U0 < 0 0 u Q C) 0 < < < r y < < < io -F m m m m m -M ct Of x m o w 2 2 1 .2- Z t Z3 21, i�l 2� 2� 2 2 o o . . . w w - E E E o E E E o j) CL u) E E o E E E E M it . , D� af of o o o u) of ol lo o o u) w u) to U CJ U7 J) Li < U U U U U < < < < < < U < < < < < < U U U U U U < < < < < U U < K ❑ D u) u) (n ❑ u) ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ u) u) ❑ ❑ ❑ n n n D > ❑ ❑ (n u) In (o v) u) u) u) -6 Z Ic! 2 . O 4 c5 c5 , — . O. . . . . . . . . . . . I N . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 z z z z z z z z z zi o m u) z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z( z z zi LU m us in z- z, m o m Lu Lu u) (n co u) o w �22 Lu A Lu w o u) u) u) u) w El it g E m ❑ p E 8� 9 u) 22 15 5 N m o o u) a� co z w z z z z m 1 6 z m, co Fn 15 m k6 x oe ae 2 .2 2 & & .2 .2 Z5 I o -2 1 m o 1 38 U o o o co u) . . . . 0 0 Q 0 c c o Ly � � to u) @ of co w z z z z Lu (D z X x x Ni ml O 4i ig 0 F- Appendix E: Roadway Project Cost Estimates Master Thoroughfare Plan Roadway Sections Freeways, Limited Access The freeway is typically uninterrupted with grade separations at intersections and ramped entries and exits to and from they crossroads as on 1 -35. However, limited access r,• { freeways may also be interrupted for signalized arterial roadway crossings. a a I I , Freeways typically operate at free flow speeds over 55 mph and have two or more lanes in a7a�N�tia{RC? GGWP¢FI4 ¢,iTtI�TCGmti each travel direction. Freeways are typically r� M ff"ao- R bra f*&,*N 'Ptw N1S barrier or median separated, or in the example of the managed lanes under design for 1 -35, can be grade separated from the rest of the corridor where ROW is constrained. The managed lanes element is intended to help maintain a free -flow speed, even during times of peak congestion on adjacent facilities. Freeways, especially controlled access, are typically paralleled by service roads that serve as the interface between the freeway and the adjacent community's arterial and collector street network. Source: Figure 11. 1-35 Managed lanes illustrative - View from Schertz Parkway. Principal Arterials The recommended ROW for principal arterials ranges from 120 to 130 feet. The ROW is intended to accommodate higher volumes and levels of mobility, providing substantial regional access and statewide travel. A ROW of 120 feet allows for four travel lanes and associated spaces. Where six travel lanes are needed, a typical section of 130 feet can be used. Urban principal arterial roadways provide the predominant passageways through the urbanized portions of the community and connect to the regional freeway network, typically providing for curb and gutter drainage. Intersections are provided at all arterial, collector and local roadways and as needed allowing for local land access directly to the facility. Intersections with arterial roadways are typically signalized and provisions made for one or more left turn lanes and occasionally right -turn lanes to facilitate the through movements along the arterial. Principal urban arterial roadways provide at least two travel lanes in each direction plus a center median area for separations of traffic. The median area may be used to provide channelized left -turn lanes, continuous left -turn lanes, and /or streetscape. Where traffic operational Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan analyses support the need for greater throughput capacity, a six -lane section may be considered — as is the case for the ultimate build out of FM 1518 south of FM 78. Access management practices should be employed to minimize the impacts of property access (i.e., driveways) on the principal arterial facility. Sidewalks, five to ten feet in width, should be provided along either sides of the roadway, buffered from travel lanes. A divided median is key for this classification of roadway, and a median width minimum of 16 feet is included. A divided median of sufficient width allows area for dedicated left turn lanes at intersections and provides access management for fewer turning conflicts, and preservation of traffic flow. The median may be raised, or surfaced depending on the adjacent land use. Driveway access onto principal arterials should be limited by access management and spacing requirements, and parking along arterial roadways is generally prohibited. The illustrations below show typical sections for four and six travel lanes with surfaced medians. • High degree of regional mobility, higher traffic volumes and operational speeds • Access is carefully managed • Curb and gutter section with underground stormwater utilities and drainage • Examples include Roy Richard Drive (FM 3009), FM 78, FM 1103, and FM 1518 south of FM 78. Figure 13. Six -Lane Principal Arterial Section Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Secondary Arterial The ROW for a secondary arterial in Schertz is 90 feet wide. The arterial is intended to accommodate medium volumes and local mobility, and provide for connections to neighboring communities. Secondary arterial roadways are intended for local trips, so design speeds should also be notably lower than principal arterials. A ROW of 90 feet allows for four travel lanes, and space to buffer different travel modes. A divided median is also important for this classification of roadway, allowing some area for reduced width left turn lanes at minor intersections and provides access management for fewer turning conflicts. Additional ROW may be preferred at major intersections. Driveway access to Secondary Arterials should also be guided by access management and spacing requirements. Parking along secondary arterial roadways is generally prohibited, unless parallel parking bays are provided in addition to travel lanes, which may be desirable in a potential mixed -use transit oriented district north of 1 -35. Bicycle accommodation is intended to be provided on a shared -use path (or hike - and -bike path), buffered from the roadway. • Cross -Town mobility • Accommodates medium traffic volumes and operational speeds • Managed Access • Four -lane divided • Curb and gutter drainage • Examples include Lower Seguin Road east of FM 1518, Wiederstein /Old Wiederstein Road, and the east -west portion of Trainer Hale Road. Figure 1. Secondary Arterial Section — Wederstein Road Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Secondary Rural Arterial Rural Secondary Arterial roadways carry traffic across significant segments of the city, connect principal arterials to collectors and accommodate moderate volumes at higher speeds. This section is intended for use where adjacent, planned land uses are lower intensity, and access points fewer than the urban section would provide. The recommended ROW for Secondary Rural Arterials is 90 feet and is intended to include a three -lane section, with two travel lanes and a surfaced median. Travel lanes should be 12 feet wide with 6- to 8- foot -wide shoulders to accommodate emergency parking, extended site lines, and bicycles. Wide areas at the edge of paved shoulders provide for stormwater drainage and buffer from the roadway from adjacent property. Where sidewalks are provided, they should be between the drainage channel and the edge of the ROW. Driveways should still be guided by access management principles. A two -way left - turn lane in the center of the section provides buffer distance from oncoming traffic and left turn opportunities without obstructing the through- movement. An adjacent 20- foot -wide trail easement allows for accommodating pedestrians and bicycles on a shared -use path (or hike - and -bike path) sufficiently buffered from the travel way, and opportunities for tree growth. • Cross -town mobility • Accommodates medium traffic volumes and higher operational speeds • Access is managed • Two -lane divided • Open section drainage Examples include Lower Seguin Road west of Hollering Vine and adjacent to Randolph AFB, and Ware Seguin Road west of FM 1518. Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Collector roadways serve to provide access to higher functional class facilities, access to residential areas, and provide access and circulation to commercial areas. They are designed for short trips, lower speeds, and connections between residential and commercial areas. They are differentiated from arterial streets by their length and degree of access to adjacent development where driveway access is seldom limited. The recommended ROW for Collector roadways is 70 feet wide. The pavement width of 40 feet is wide enough to provide different layouts of lane striping to accommodate adjacent uses — whether it is on street parking, or bike lanes, or a center -turn lane, the width is intended to be flexible over time as needs change. Three typical sections are provided: one residential section with on street bike lanes, one commercial section with a middle turn lane for frequent driveways and turn - movements, and one commercial section with on street parking. • Collection and distribution of traffic • Speeds and volumes dependent on adjacent land uses and neighborhoods served • Access to development and neighborhoods • Connectivity to arterial and residential collector streets Typical Residential Collector — 70 -foot ROW: 7 -foot buffered bike lanes accommodate bicycles of all comfort levels. Examples include Ray Corbett Drive, Live Oak Road, Wiederstein Road west of FM 3009, Country Club Boulevard, Eckhardt Road, and segments of Ware Seguin Road. '- •- • • •' Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Typical Commercial Collectors — 70 -foot ROW — applicable in Southern Schertz near 1 -10 and northern Schertz near 1 -35. The 12- foot -wide outside lanes can accommodate more experienced bicycles. A shared - used path on one side accommodates less experienced bicycles. Figure 18. Commercial Collector (TOD) - Example: New Streets in TOD area LOCI Residential and Commercial/industrial Streets The primary function of local streets is to provide access to and from properties. Local streets feed to and from the collector street network, but occasionally may tie directly to arterial streets. The urban local residential street is described in the Schertz Unified Development Code as a 30 -foot pavement width, with curb - and - gutter drainage and minimum 5- foot -wide sidewalks on each side of the street, buffered from the curb. Local residential streets have a 50- foot -wide ROW. Local commercial /industrial streets are described as 42 feet of pavement, with curb and gutter drainage, 5 -foot sidewalks, and a 60- foot -wide ROW. Local streets are not illustrated on the MTP map, but are encouraged to be developed to increase connectivity, lessen block lengths, and encourage active and non -auto modes of travel for people on foot, pedestrians in wheelchairs, and people on bike. Chapter 3. Thoroughfare System Plan Impact Fee CIP Project Cost Estimates City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,690 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 17 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 51,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 84,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 163,800 4 10" Flex Base 11,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 203,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 79,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 169,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,950 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 19,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 47,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 28,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 190,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,236,950 Mobilization 5% $ 61,900 Contineencv 10% $ 129,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,428,800 7% $ 100,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 2 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 FM 482 to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,379 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 166,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 18,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 325,800 4 10" Flex Base 22,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 406,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 158,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,520 LF $ 25.00 $ 338,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 280,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,640 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 36,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 92,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 55,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 368,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 2,545,600 127,300 267,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,940,200 7% $ 205,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 3 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 2252 Railroad Tracks to N. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial = No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,162 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 58,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 6,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 111,600 4 10" Flex Base 7,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 140,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 7,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 54,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 7,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 7,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,650 LF $ 25.00 $ 116,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,970 SY $ 5.00 $ 14,850 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 12,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 31,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 19,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 126,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other None - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 825,000 Mobilization 5% $ 41,300 Contineencv 10% $ 86,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 953,000 7% $ 66,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 4 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (1) IH -35 to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,600 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 66 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 198,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 324,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 4 10" Flex Base 44,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 792,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 44,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 308,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 44,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 44,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 26,400 LF $ 25.00 $ 660,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 550,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 16,870 SY $ 5.00 $ 84,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 71,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 179,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 107,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 718,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 4,822,250 241,200 506,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,569,900 7% $ 389,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 445,500 $ 445,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 5 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (1) N/S Connector (1) to FM 2252 Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial - No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,227 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 62 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 316,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 36,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 649,800 4 10" Flex Base 43,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 774,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 43,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 301,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 43,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 43,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 20,910 LF $ 25.00 $ 522,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 290,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,130 SY $ 5.00 $ 40,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 62,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 154,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 92,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 619,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ - $ 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 15 ©,000 4,175, 300 208,800 438,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,822,600 7% $ 337,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 352,800 $ 352,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 6 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (2) N/S Connector (1) to FM 2252 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,227 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 206,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 439,200 4 10" Flex Base 27,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 502,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 27,900 SY $ 7.00 $ 195,300 6 TX -5 Geogrid 27,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 27,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 10,460 LF $ 25.00 $ 261,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 13,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 695,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 49,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 124,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 74,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 497,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,232,200 Mobilization 5% $ 161,700 Contineencv 10% $ 339,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,733,300 7% $ 261,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 274,400 $ 274,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 FM 2252 to Hubertus Rd Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,544 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 56 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 168,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 272,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 532,800 4 10" Flex Base 37,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 666,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 37,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 259,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 37,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 37,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 22,180 LF $ 25.00 $ 554,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 9,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 460,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 32,650 SY $ 5.00 $ 163,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 62,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 155,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 93,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 622,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,246,550 Mobilization 5% $ 212,400 Contineencv 10% $ 445,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,904,900 7% $ 343,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 207,900 $ 207,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 8 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Hubertus Rd to Railroad Tracks Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 5,280 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 53 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 159,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 13,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 260,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 28,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 507,600 4 10" Flex Base 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 35,200 SY $ 7.00 $ 246,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 35,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 35,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,120 LF $ 25.00 $ 528,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 440,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 31,090 SY $ 5.00 $ 155,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 59,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 148,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 89,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 593,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000 4,005,050 200,300 420,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,626,000 7% $ 323,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 198,000 $ 198,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 9 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 800' West of Friesenhahn Ln. to Friesenhahn Ln. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (►f): 800 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 8 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 77,400 4 10" Flex Base 5,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 97,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 37,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,200 LF $ 25.00 $ 80,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 65,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,710 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 9,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 22,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 90,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 585,750 Mobilization 5% - $ 29,300 Contineencv 10% $ 61,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 676,700 7% $ 47,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 10 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Friesenhahn Ln. to Schwab Rd. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,115 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 32 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 96,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 154,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 300,600 4 10" Flex Base 20,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 374,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 145,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 12,470 LF $ 25.00 $ 311,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 260,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 18,350 SY $ 5.00 $ 91,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 35,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 87,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 52,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 351,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100;000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,381,500 Mobilization 5% $ 119,100 Contineencv 10% $ 250,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,750,700 7% $ 192,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 116,800 $ 116,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 482 Schwab Rd. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,336 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 64 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 192,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 310,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 33,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 608,400 4 10" Flex Base 42,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 761,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 42,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 296,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 42,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 42,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 25,350 LF $ 25.00 $ 633,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 530,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 37,310 SY $ 5.00 $ 186,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 71,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 178,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 106,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 712,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,828,900 Mobilization 5% $ 241,500 Contineencv 10% $ 507,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,577,500 7% $ 390,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 237,600 $ 237,600 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 12 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HUBERTUS ROAD IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 3,010 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 148,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 289,800 4 10" Flex Base 20,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 361,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 140,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 12,040 LF $ 25.00 $ 301,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 250,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 17,720 SY $ 5.00 $ 88,600 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 33,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 84,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 50,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20%_ $ 338,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,201,000 Mobilization 5% $ 110,100 Contineencv 10% $ 231,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,542,300 7% $ 178,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 135,400 $ 135,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 13 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HUBERTUS ROAD FM 482 to N. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,584 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 - - - - Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 16 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 48,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 78,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 8,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 153,000 4 10" Flex Base 10,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 190,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 10,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 74,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 10,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 10,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,340 LF $ 25.00 $ 158,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 130,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,330 SY $ 5.00 $ 46,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 17,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 44,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 26,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 178,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,156,750 Mobilization 5% $ 57,900 Contineencv 10% $ 121,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,336,200 7% $ 93,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 142,600 $ 142,600 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 14 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: FRIESENHAHN LANE IH -35 to FM 482 Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 1,690 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 17 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 51,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 62,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 129,600 4 10" Flex Base 8,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 149,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 8,300 SY $ 7.00 $ 58,100 6 TX -5 Geogrid 8,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 8,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,380 LF $ 25.00 $ 84,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,820 SY $ 5.00 $ 14,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 14,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 34,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 21,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 139,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 150,000' 1,056,300 52,900 111,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,220,200 7% $ 85,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 38,000 $ 38,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 15 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHWAB ROAD IH -35 to FM 482 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 3,326 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 200 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 - - - - - - Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard - - - Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 218,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 25,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 453,600 4 10" Flex Base 29,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 532,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 29,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 207,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 29,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 29,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,310 LF $ 25.00 $ 332,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 275,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 41,760 SY $ 5.00 $ 208,800 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 47,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 118,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 70,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 472,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other At -grade RR crossing - - $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,317,750 Mobilization 5% $ 165,900 Contineencv 10% $ 348,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,832,100 7% $ 268,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 274,400 $ 274,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 16 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: E/W CONNECTOR (3) Hubertus Rd. to David Lack Blvd. Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 8,395 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 84 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 252,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 302,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 35,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 639,000 4 10" Flex Base 41,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 739,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 41,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 287,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 41,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 41,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 16,800 LF $ 25.00 $ 420,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 14,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 700,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 13,990 SY $ 5.00 $ 69,950 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 69,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 172,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 103,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 690,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,587,250 Mobilization 5% $ 229,400 Contineencv 10% $ 481,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 5,298,400 7% $ 370,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 440,700 $ 440,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 17 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate ECKHARDT ROAD Froboese Ln. to Green Valley Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,861 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 177,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 212,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 446,400 4 10" Flex Base 28,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 516,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 28,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 200,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 28,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 28,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,730 LF $ 25.00 $ 293,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 13,020 SY $ 5.00 $ 65,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 45,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 113,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 68,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 453,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,944,550 Mobilization 5% $ 147,300 Contineencv 10% $ 309,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,401,100 7% $ 238,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 87,900 $ 87,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 18 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHWAB ROAD IH -35 to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial =_ No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 6,019 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 61 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 183,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 14,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 296,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 32,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 579,600 4 10" Flex Base 40,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 723,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 40,200 SY $ 7.00 $ 281,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 40,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 40,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 24,080 LF $ 25.00 $ 602,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 500,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 15,380 SY $ 5.00 $ 76,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 65,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 164,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 98,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 656,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 4,267,700 Mobilization 5% - $ 213,400 Contineencv 10% $ 448,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,929,300 7% $ 345,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 406,300 $ 406,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 19 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FROBOESE LANE Schwab Rd. to Eckhardt Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 3,010 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 108,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 230,400 4 10" Flex Base 14,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 266,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 103,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,020 LF $ 25.00 $ 150,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 165,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,690 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 23,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 58,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 35,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 233,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,514,950 Mobilization 5% $ 75,800 Contineencv 10% $ 159,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,749,900 7% $ 122,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 158,000 $ 158,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 20 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FROBOESE LANE E/W Break Pt. 1 to E/W Break Pt. 2 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,380 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 14 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 42,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 50,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 106,200 4 10" Flex Base 6,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 122,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 6,800 SY $ 7.00 $ 47,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 6,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 6,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 69,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 75,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,070 SY $ 5.00 $ 15,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 10,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 26,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 16,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 106,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 694,850 Mobilization 5% $ 34,800 Contineencv 10% $ 73,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 802,700 7% $ 56,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 31,100 $ 31,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 21 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate GREEN VALLEY ROAD W. City Limits to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 4,594 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 46 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 138,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 11,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 226,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 441,000 4 10" Flex Base 30,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 552,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 30,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 214,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 30,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 30,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 18,380 LF $ 25.00 $ 459,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,700 SY $ 50.00 $ 385,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 11,740 SY $ 5.00 $ 58,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 50,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 125,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 75,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 501,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,258,500 Mobilization 5% $ 163,000 Contineencv 10% $ 342,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,763,700 7% $ 263,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 172,300 $ 172,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 22 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate HOMESTEAD PARKWAY Existing Homestead Pkwy. to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,742 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 18 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 54,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,200 Cy $ 20.00 $ 64,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 133,200 4 10" Flex Base 8,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 154,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 8,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 60,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 8,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 8,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,490 LF $ 25.00 $ 87,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,870 SY $ 5.00 $ 19,350 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 13,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 33,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 20,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 135,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 879,500 Mobilization 5% $ 44,000 Contineencv 10% $ 92,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,015,900 7% $ 71,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 91,500 $ 91,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 23 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate COUNTRY CLUB BOULEVARD Scenic Links to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,848 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 19 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 57,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 68,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 142,200 4 10" Flex Base 9,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 163,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 9,100 SY $ 7.00 $ 63,700 6 TX -5 Geogrid 9,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 9,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,700 LF $ 25.00 $ 92,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 105,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,110 SY $ 5.00 $ 20,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 14,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 36,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 21,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 144,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 938,550 Mobilization 5% $ 47,000 Contineencv 10% $ 98,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,084,200 7% $ 75,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 97,000 $ 97,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 24 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (4) Country Club Blvd. to Homestead Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,073 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 41 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 123,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 148,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 17,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 309,600 4 10" Flex Base 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 20,000 SY $ 7.00 $ 140,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 20,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 20,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,150 LF $ 25.00 $ 203,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 225,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,050 SY $ 5.00 $ 45,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 30,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 76,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 45,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 305,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,988,250 Mobilization 5% $ 99,500 Contineencv 10% $ 208,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,296,600 7% $ 160,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 213,800 $ 213,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 25 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (4) Schwab Rd. to Eckhardt Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,376 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 24 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 72,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 86,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 181,800 4 10" Flex Base 11,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 210,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 81,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,760 LF $ 25.00 $ 119,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 130,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,280 SY $ 5.00 $ 26,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 18,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 46,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 27,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 183,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,195,300 Mobilization 5% $ 59,800 Contineencv 10% $ 125,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,380,700 7% $ 96,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 124,700 $ 124,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 26 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1103 IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 3,696 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard funded through City Go Bonds, TxDOT, and AAMPO. City contribution anticipated at $2,000,000 Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost Construction City contribution - - - $ 2,000,000 Engineering /Survey /Testing 7% $ - Right -of -Way Acquisition Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ - $ - 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 27 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (1) IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 2,904 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 30 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 90,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 279,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 349,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 135,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,420 SY $ 5.00 $ 37,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 31,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 79,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 47,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 316,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,158,000 Mobilization 5% $ 107,900 Contineencv 10% $ 226,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,492,500 7% $ 174,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 28 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: N/S CONNECTOR (2) IH -35 to Old Wiederstein Rd. Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 3,854 90 Raised 48 Construction of new roadwa Shared -Use Path bicycle facil hfare standard Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 39 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 117,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 190,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 370,800 4 10" Flex Base 25,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 462,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 25,700 SY $ 7.00 $ 179,900 6 TX -5 Geogrid 25,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 25,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 15,420 LF $ 25.00 $ 385,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 320,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,850 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 42,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 105,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 63,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 420,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,731,250 Mobilization 5% $ 136,600 Contineencv 10% $ 286,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,154,700 7% $ 220,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 260,200 $ 260,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 29 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (5) N/S Connector (1) to FM 1103 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 10,552 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 106 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 318,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 19,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 380,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 44,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 802,800 4 10" Flex Base 51,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 928,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 51,600 SY $ 7.00 $ 361,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 51,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 51,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 21,110 LF $ 25.00 $ 527,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,700 SY $ 50.00 $ 585,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 23,450 SY $ 5.00 $ 117,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 81,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 203,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 122,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 814,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 5,294,300 Mobilization 5% $ 264,800 Contineencv 10% $ 556,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 6,115,100 7% $ 428,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 554,000 $ 554,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 30 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate OLD WIEDERSTEIN ROAD N/S Connector (1) to Cherry Tree Dr. Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 =_ Length (If): 11,458 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 115 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 345,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 28,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 562,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 61,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,101,600 4 10" Flex Base 76,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,375,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 76,400 SY $ 7.00 $ 534,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 76,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 76,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 45,840 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,146,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 19,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 955,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 29,280 SY $ 5.00 $ 146,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 124,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 312,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 187,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 1,248,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 8,115,300 Mobilization 5% $ 405,800 Contineencv 10% $ 852,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 9,373,300 7% $ 656,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 257,800 $ 257,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 31 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate DOERR LANE N. City Limits to Lookout Rd. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 4,805 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 49 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 147,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 174,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 365,400 4 10" Flex Base 23,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 423,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 23,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 94,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 23,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 23,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 240,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 400,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,010 SY $ 5.00 $ 40,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 38,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 95,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 57,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 381,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ 18 Other At -grade RR crossing- $ 150,000 $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 150,000 15©,000 2,629,600 131,500 276,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,037,300 7% $ 212,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 32 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (2) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 - - - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard - On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 4 10" Flex Base 22,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 412,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,560 LF $ 25.00 $ 214,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 39,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 98,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 59,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 393,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ ? $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,558,200 Mobilization 5% $ 128,000 Contineencv 10% $ 268,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,954,900 7% $ 206,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 224,500 $ 224,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 33 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (6) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Commercial Collector B No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 42 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street parking (9' + 9') Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 360,000 4 10" Flex Base 22,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 412,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,560 LF $ 25.00 $ 214,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 0 SY $ 5.00 $ - Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 39,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 98,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 59,100 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 393,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,558,200 Mobilization 5% $ 127,900 Contineencv 10% $ 268,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,954,800 7% $ 206,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 224,500 $ 224,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 34 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MID - CITIES PARKWAY IH -35 to FM 3009 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 5,174 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 - - - - - Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 52 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 156,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 9,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 186,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 21,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 394,200 4 10" Flex Base 25,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 455,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 25,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 101,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 25,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 25,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 10,350 LF $ 25.00 $ 258,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 430,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,620 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 41,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 102,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 61,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 410,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,664,950 Mobilization 5% $ 133,300 Contineencv 10% $ 279,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,078,200 7% $ 215,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 35 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (1) FM 3009 to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 4,277 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 62 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 43 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 129,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 258,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 531,000 4 10" Flex Base 35,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 633,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 35,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 140,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 35,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 35,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 17,110 LF $ 25.00 $ 427,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,650 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 48,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 121,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 72,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 485,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,157,400 Mobilization 5% $ 157,900 Contineencv 10% $ 331,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,646,900 7% $ 255,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 288,700 $ 288,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 36 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (7) W. City Limits to Doerr Ln. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 3,432 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 35 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 105,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 124,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 14,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 261,000 4 10" Flex Base 16,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 302,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 16,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 67,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 16,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 16,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,870 LF $ 25.00 $ 171,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 190,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,630 SY $ 5.00 $ 38,150 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 25,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 63,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 38,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 255,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,659,400 Mobilization 5% $ 83,000 Contineencv 10% $ 174,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,916,700 7% $ 134,200 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 180,200 $ 180,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 37 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOOKOUT ROAD Tri- County Pkwy. to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 3,907 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 40 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 120,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 16,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 297,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 345,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 76,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,820 LF $ 25.00 $ 195,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,510 SY $ 5.00 $ 32,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 31,100 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 77,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 46,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 310,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,219,950 Mobilization 5% - $ 111,000 Contineencv 10% $ 233,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,564,100 7% $ 179,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 38 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FOUR OAKS LANE Existing Four Oaks Ln. to N/S Connector (1) Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 2,851 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane J 38 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 29 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 87,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 104,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 217,800 4 10" Flex Base 14,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 252,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 56,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,750 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 34,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 227,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,478,700 Mobilization 5% $ 74,000 Contineencv 10% $ 155,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,708,000 7% $ 119,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 149,700 $ 149,700 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 39 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: E. City Limits to FM 3009 Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 3,379 90 Raised 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 34 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 102,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 166,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 18,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 325,800 4 10" Flex Base 22,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 406,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 90,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,520 LF $ 25.00 $ 338,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 280,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,640 SY $ 5.00 $ 43,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 35,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 88,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 53,300 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 355,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,307,400 Mobilization 5% $ 115,400 Contineencv 10% $ 242,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,665,100 7% $ 186,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 228,100 $ 228,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 40 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate WIEDERSTEIN ROAD W. City Limits to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,165 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 22 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 66,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 78,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 165,600 4 10" Flex Base 10,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 190,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 10,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 42,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 10,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 10,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 108,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,810 SY $ 5.00 $ 24,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 16,200 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 40,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 24,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 161,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,047,600 Mobilization 5% $ 52,400 Contineencv 10% $ 110,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,210,000 7% $ 84,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 41 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate BAPTIST HEALTH DRIVE Ripps - Kreusler to Wiederstein Rd. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,426 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 15 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 52,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 6,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 109,800 4 10" Flex Base 7,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 126,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 7,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 28,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 7,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 7,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,860 LF $ 25.00 $ 71,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,380 SY $ 5.00 $ 11,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 11,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 28,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 17,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 114,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 742,800 Mobilization 5% $ 37,200 Contineencv 10% $ 78,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 858,000 7% $ 60,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 74,800 $ 74,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 42 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate RIPPS- KREUSLER Baptist Health Dr. to End of Alignment Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,162 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 42,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 90,000 4 10" Flex Base 5,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 102,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,700 SY $ 4.00 $ 22,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,700 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 58,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 95,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 1,940 SY $ 5.00 $ 9,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 9,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 23,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 92,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 600,950 Mobilization 5% $ 30,100 Contineencv 10% $ 63,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 694,300 7% $ 48,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 43 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MASKE ROAD FM 1518 to Oak St. Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 2,851 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 29 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 87,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 104,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 217,800 4 10" Flex Base 14,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 252,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 56,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,750 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,750 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 34,200 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 227,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,478,700 Mobilization 5% $ 74,000 Contineencv 10% $ 155,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,708,000 7% $ 119,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 44 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate MASKE ROAD Oak St. to Schertz Pkwy. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,646 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 47 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 141,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 168,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 19,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 354,600 4 10" Flex Base 22,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 410,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 22,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 91,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 22,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 22,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,300 LF $ 25.00 $ 232,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 260,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 10,330 SY $ 5.00 $ 51,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 34,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 86,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 52,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 346,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Major Crossing $ 500,000 $ 500,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,752,050 Mobilization 5% $ 137,700 Contineencv 10% $ 289,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,178,800 7% $ 222,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 243,900 $ 243,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 45 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: FM 1518 Maske Rd. to Oak St. Secondary Arterial = No. of Lanes: 3 -_ 6.864 70 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 38 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard; special section Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 69 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 207,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 248,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 29,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 522,000 4 10" Flex Base 33,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 604,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 33,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 134,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 33,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 33,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 13,730 LF $ 25.00 $ 343,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 11,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 570,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 11,440 SY $ 5.00 $ 57,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 54,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 136,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 81,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 544,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,636,650 Mobilization 5% $ 181,900 Contineencv 10% $ 381,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,200,500 7% $ 294,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 46 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 N. City Limits to Service Area 3 Limit Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 1,901 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 20 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 60,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 124,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 14,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 259,200 4 10" Flex Base 16,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 304,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 16,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 67,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 16,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 16,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 190,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 160,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,080 SY $ 5.00 $ 45,400 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 24,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 61,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 36,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 245,600 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 = $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,696,050 Mobilization 5% $ 84,900 Contineencv 10% $ 178,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 391,800 7% $ 27,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 17,100 $ 17,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 47 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 Service Area 3 Limit to Schertz Pkwy. Extension Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 2,059 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 21 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 63,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,800 CY $ 20.00 $ 136,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 280,800 4 10" Flex Base 18,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 331,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 18,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 73,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 18,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 18,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,240 LF $ 25.00 $ 206,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 170,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 9,840 SY $ 5.00 $ 49,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 26,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 66,500 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 39,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20%_ $ 265,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,726,900 Mobilization 5% $ 86,400 Contineencv 10% $ 181,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 398,900 7% $ 27,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 18,500 $ 18,500 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 48 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 78 /JOHN PETERSON BOULEVARD W. City Limits to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 9,557 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 96 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 288,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 31,200 CY $ 20.00 $ 624,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 72,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,301,400 4 10" Flex Base 85,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,530,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 85,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 340,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 85,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 85,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 38,230 LF $ 25.00 $ 955,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 15,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 795,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 35,040 SY $ 5.00 $ 175,200 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 121,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 304,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 182,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 1,218,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures 1/2 Bridge on Either End $ 2,835,000 $ 2,835,000 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 10,857,850 Mobilization 5% = $ 542,900 Contineencv 10% = $ 1,140,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 2,508,180 7% $ 175,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 49 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy. Extension to IH -10 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 6 Length (If): 21,595 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 130 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 68 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 216 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 648,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 70,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 1,408,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 163,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 2,937,600 4 10" Flex Base 192,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 3,456,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 192,000 SY $ 4.00 $ 768,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 192,000 SY $ 1.00 $ 192,000 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 86,390 LF $ 25.00 $ 2,159,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 36,000 SY $ 50.00 $ 1,800,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 103,180 SY $ 5.00 $ 515,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 277,800 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 694,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 416,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 2,777,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 3 Minor Crossings - $ 300,000 $ 300,000 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 1,890,000 $ 1,890,000 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 20,241,050 Mobilization 5% $ 1,012,100 Contineencv 10% $ 2,125,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost City Contribution (TxDOT) 20% $ 4,675,700 7% $ 327,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 162,000 $ 162,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 50 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCHAEFER ROAD W. City Limits to FM 1518 Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 2,534 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 26 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 78,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,600 CY $ 20.00 $ 92,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 194,400 4 10" Flex Base 12,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 223,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 12,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 49,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 12,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 12,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,070 LF $ 25.00 $ 126,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 140,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,630 SY $ 5.00 $ 28,150 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 18,900 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 47,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 28,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 188,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,228,000 Mobilization 5% $ 61,400 Contineencv 10% $ 129,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,418,400 7% $ 99,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 19,000 $ 19,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 51 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate RAF- BURNETTE Schaefer Rd. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 2,904 - Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 30 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 90,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 142,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 279,000 4 10" Flex Base 19,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 349,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 77,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 240,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,420 SY $ 5.00 $ 37,100 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 30,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 76,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 45,800 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 305,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ - 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,982,400 Mobilization 5% $ 99,200 Contineencv 10% $ 208,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,289,800 7% $ 160,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 108,900 $ 108,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 52 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD W. City Limits to E. of Tates Dr. Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 1,848 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 19 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 57,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 82,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 9,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 178,200 4 10" Flex Base 11,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 199,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 11,100 SY $ 4.00 $ 44,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 11,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 11,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,700 LF $ 25.00 $ 92,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 155,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 5,130 SY $ 5.00 $ 25,650 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 17,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 42,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 25,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 169,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,099,550 Mobilization 5% $ 55,000 Contineencv 10% $ 115,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,270,100 7% $ 88,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 13,900 $ 13,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 53 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD E. of Tates Dr. to W. of Canopy Bend /Aranda Ln. Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 9,293 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 93 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 20,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 49,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 51,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 51,700 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 51,700 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 10,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 33,040 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 279,000 410,000 892,800 930,600 206,800 51,700 515,000 165,200 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% $ 69,100 5% $ 172,600 3% $ 103,600 20% $ 690,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 1,120,000 $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 1,120,000 1,120,000 5,606,700 280,400 588,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 6,475,900 7% $ 453,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 69,700 $ 69,700 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 54 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate LOWER SEGUIN ROAD W. of Canopy Bend /Aranda Ln. to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 9,082 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 91 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 273,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 22,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 446,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 48,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 873,000 4 10" Flex Base 60,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,090,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 60,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 242,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 60,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 60,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 36,330 LF $ 25.00 $ 908,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 15,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 755,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 23,210 SY $ 5.00 $ 116,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 95,400 11 Traffic Control 5% = $ 238,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 143,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 953,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,194,900 Mobilization 5% $ 309,800 Contineencv 10% $ 650,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,155,200 7% $ 500,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 204,300 $ 204,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 55 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (3) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 792 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 8 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 24,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 77,400 4 10" Flex Base 5,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 95,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 21,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 3,170 LF $ 25.00 $ 79,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 65,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,660 SY $ 5.00 $ 23,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 8,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 21,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 13,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% _ $ 86,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 560,350 Mobilization 5% $ 28,100 Contineencv 10% $ 58,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 647,400 7% $ 45,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 71,300 $ 71,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 56 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (3) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 1,426 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 15 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 3,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 70,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 7,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 138,600 4 10" Flex Base 9,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 172,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 9,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 38,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 9,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 9,600 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 5,710 LF $ 25.00 $ 142,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 2,400 SY $ 50.00 $ 120,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 8,400 SY $ 5.00 $ 42,000 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 15,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 39,000 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 23,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 155,900 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,013,050 Mobilization 5% $ 50,700 Contineencv 10% $ 106,400 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,170,200 7% $ 81,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 128,300 $ 128,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 57 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (4) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector - No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,373 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 14 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 42,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 50,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 5,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 104,400 4 10" Flex Base 6,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 122,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 6,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 27,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 6,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 6,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,750 LF $ 25.00 $ 68,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 75,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 3,050 SY $ 5.00 $ 15,250 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 10,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 25,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 15,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 102,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 665,500 Mobilization 5% $ 33,300 Contineencv 10% $ 69,900 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 768,700 7% $ 53,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 72,100 $ 72,100 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 58 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S Connector (4) N. City Limits to S. City Limits Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 1,109 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 12 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 36,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 2,000 CY $ 20.00 $ 40,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 4,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 84,600 4 10" Flex Base 5,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 99,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 5,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 22,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 5,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 5,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 2,220 LF $ 25.00 $ 55,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 1,200 SY $ 50.00 $ 60,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 2,460 SY $ 5.00 $ 12,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 8,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 20,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 12,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 83,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 539,500 Mobilization 5% $ 27,000 Contineencv 10% $ 56,700 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 623,200 7% $ 43,600 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 58,200 $ 58,200 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 59 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: WEST WARE SEGUIN ROAD W. City Limits to Boeing Dr. Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 3,010 70 None 1 38 Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 31 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 93,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 5,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 108,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 12,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 230,400 4 10" Flex Base 14,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 266,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 14,800 SY $ 4.00 $ 59,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 14,800 SY $ 1.00 $ 14,800 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 6,020 LF $ 25.00 $ 150,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 165,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,690 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,450 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 22,500 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 56,100 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 33,700 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 224,200 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,457,250 Mobilization 5% $ 72,900 Contineencv 10% $ 153,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,683,300 7% $ 117,800 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 60 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate WEST WARE SEGUIN ROAD Boeing Dr. to N/S Connector (5) Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 3,538 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 36 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 108,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 6,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 128,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 15,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 270,000 4 10" Flex Base 17,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 311,400 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 17,300 SY $ 4.00 $ 69,200 6 TX -5 Geogrid 17,300 SY $ 1.00 $ 17,300 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 7,080 LF $ 25.00 $ 177,000 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 3,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 195,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 7,860 SY $ 5.00 $ 39,300 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 26,400 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 65,800 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 39,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 263,100 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,810,000 Mobilization 5% $ 90,500 Contineencv 10% $ 190,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,090,600 7% $ 146,300 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ $ - Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 61 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (S) Lower Seguin Rd. to W. Ware Seguin Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 5,808 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 177,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 10,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 210,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 24,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 442,800 4 10" Flex Base 28,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 511,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 28,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 113,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 28,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 28,400 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 11,620 LF $ 25.00 $ 290,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 325,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 12,910 SY $ 5.00 $ 64,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 43,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 108,200 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 64,900 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 432,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,812,150 Mobilization 5% $ 140,700 Contineencv 10% $ 295,300 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,248,200 7% $ 227,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 304,900 $ 304,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 62 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (S) W. Ware Seguin Rd. to E. Ware Seguin Rd. Functional Classification: Residential Collector No. of Lanes: 2 Length (If): 4,910 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: None Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Reconstruction of roadway to thoroughfare standard On- street bicycle facility (Pavement: 7' + T) Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 50 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 150,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 8,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 178,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 20,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 374,400 4 10" Flex Base 24,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 433,800 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 24,100 SY $ 4.00 $ 96,400 6 TX -5 Geogrid 24,100 SY $ 1.00 $ 24,100 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 9,830 LF $ 25.00 $ 245,750 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 5,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 275,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 10,910 SY $ 5.00 $ 54,550 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 36,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 91,600 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 55,000 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 366,400 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 2 Minor Crossings - $ 200,000 $ 200,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 2,581,700 Mobilization 5% = $ 129,100 Contineencv 10% $ 271,100 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,981,900 7% $ 208,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 36,800 $ 36,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 63 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate TRAINER HALE ROAD (N /S) Weir Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Principal Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 8,765 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 120 - - - - Median Type: Raised Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 88 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 264,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 21,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 430,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 46,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 842,400 4 10" Flex Base 58,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,053,000 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 58,500 SY $ 4.00 $ 234,000 6 TX -5 Geogrid 58,500 SY $ 1.00 $ 58,500 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 35,060 LF $ 25.00 $ 876,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 14,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 730,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 51,610 SY $ 5.00 $ 258,050 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 95,000 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 237,400 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 142,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 949,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,170,550 Mobilization 5% $ 308,600 Contineencv 10% $ 648,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,127,200 7% $ 498,900 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 394,400 $ 394,400 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 64 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate TRAINER HALE ROAD (E /W) FM 1518 to Trainer Hale Rd. (N /S) Functional Classification: Secondary Arterial No. of Lanes: 4 Length (If): 7,973 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 - - - Median Type: Raised - - - - - - - Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 80 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 240,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 19,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 390,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 42,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 766,800 4 10" Flex Base 53,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 957,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 53,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 212,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 53,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 53,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 31,900 LF $ 25.00 $ 797,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 13,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 665,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,370 SY $ 5.00 $ 101,850 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 83,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 209,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 125,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 837,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures 1 Bridge $ 750,000 $ 750,000 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None $ - $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,190,350 Mobilization 5% $ 309,600 Contineencv 10% $ 650,000 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,150,000 7% $ 500,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 59,800 $ 59,800 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 65 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: WARE SEGUIN ROAD Graytown Rd. to N/S Connector (5) Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 7,128 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 72 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 15,700 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 38,100 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 39,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 39,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 39,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,900 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 25,340 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 216,000 314,000 685,800 712,800 158,400 39,600 395,000 126,700 Pct. Of Paving Item Cost 2% $ 53,000 5% $ 132,500 3% $ 79,500 20% $ 529,700 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,443,000 Mobilization 5% $ 172,200 Contineencv 10% $ 361,600 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,976,800 7% $ 278,400 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 481,100 $ 481,100 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 66 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: EAST WARE SEGUIN ROAD N/S Connector (5) to FM 1518 Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 7,445 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit 14 Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 75 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 16,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 39,800 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 41,400 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 41,400 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 41,400 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 8,300 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 26,470 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 225,000 328,000 716,400 745,200 165,600 41,400 415,000 132,350 Pct. Of Paving Item Cost 2% $ 55,400 5% $ 138,500 3% $ 83,100 20% $ 553,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 100,000 100,000 3,699,750 185,000 388,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 4,273,300 7% $ 299,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 167,500 $ 167,500 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 67 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate GRAYTOWN ROAD Boeing Dr. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 5,861 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 90 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 48 - - - - - Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard - - Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 59 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 12,900 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 31,300 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 32,600 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 32,600 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 32,600 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,840 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 177,000 258,000 563,400 586,800 130,400 32,600 325,000 104,200 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% - $ 43,600 5% $ 108,900 3% $ 65,400 20% $ 435,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures 3 Minor Crossings $ 300,000 - $ 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ 17 Traffic Signals None - $ $ 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ Mobilization 5% $ Contineencv 10% $ Item Cost 300,000 300,000 3,130,800 156,600 328,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,616,200 7% $ 253,100 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 131,900 $ 131,900 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 68 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate N/S CONNECTOR (6) Ware Seguin Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 2,482 - - Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 25 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 75,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 4,500 CY $ 20.00 $ 90,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 10,500 SY $ 18.00 $ 189,000 4 10" Flex Base 12,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 219,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 12,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 48,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 12,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 12,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 4,970 LF $ 25.00 $ 124,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 4,100 SY $ 50.00 $ 205,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 4,140 SY $ 5.00 $ 20,700 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 19,700 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 49,300 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 29,600 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 197,000 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None - - - $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None - - - $ $ - 18 Other None - - - $ $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 1,280,150 Mobilization 5% $ 64,100 Contineencv 10% $ 134,500 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 1,478,800 7% $ 103,500 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 130,300 $ 130,300 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 69 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate E/W CONNECTOR (8) IH 10 to E. City Limits Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 12,302 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: TWLTL Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 - - - - - - - Description: Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 124 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 372,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 22,100 CY $ 20.00 $ 442,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 52,000 SY $ 18.00 $ 936,000 4 10" Flex Base 60,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 1,083,600 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 60,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 240,800 6 TX -5 Geogrid 60,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 60,200 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 24,610 LF $ 25.00 $ 615,250 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 20,500 SY $ 50.00 $ 1,025,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 20,500 SY $ 5.00 $ 102,500 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 97,600 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 243,900 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 146,400 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 975,500 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ $ 15 Drainage Structures None - - $ $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 6,340,750 Mobilization 5% $ 317,100 Contineencv 10% $ 665,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 7,323,700 7% $ 512,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 645,900 $ 645,900 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 70 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate Functional Classification: Length (If): Right -of -Way Width (ft.): Median Type: Pavement Width (Edge to Edge) Description: BINZ- ENGLEMAN ROAD W. City Limits to Graytown Rd. Secondary Rural Arterial No. of Lanes: 3 6,864 90 Two -Way Left Turn Lane 48 Construction of new roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit $ Unit Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 69 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 18,400 CY $ 20.00 $ 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 36,700 SY $ 18.00 $ 4 10" Flex Base 38,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 38,200 SY $ 4.00 $ 6 TX -5 Geogrid 38,200 SY $ 1.00 $ 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 0 LF $ 25.00 $ 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 7,600 SY $ 50.00 $ 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 24,410 SY $ 5.00 $ Item No. Item Description 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 11 Traffic Control 12 Erosion Control 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) Item Cost 207,000 368,000 660,600 687,600 152,800 38,200 380,000 122,050 Pct. Of Paving Item Description Item Cost 2% $ 52,400 5% $ 130,900 3% $ 78,500 20% $ 523,300 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None - - - $ - $ 15 Drainage Structures None - $ - $ - 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ - $ - 18 Other None - - - $ - $ - Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition I, II, & III Construction Subtotal: $ 3,401,350 Mobilization 5% - $ 170,100 Contineencv 10% $ 357,200 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 3,928,700 7% $ 275,000 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 463,300 $ 463,300 2017 Impact Fee Update Freese and Nichols, Inc. City of Schertz Updated: 612017 71 City of Schertz Impact Fee Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction Cost Estimate SCENIC LAKE DRIVE Binz - Engleman Rd. to IH -10 Functional Classification: Commercial Collector A No. of Lanes: 3 Length (If): 4,066 Right -of -Way Width (ft.): 70 Median Type: Two -Way Left Turn Lane Pavement Width (Edge to Edge): 38 Description: Widening of roadway to thoroughfare standard Shared -Use Path bicycle facility Item No. Item Description Quantity Unit Item Cost Unit Cost Pavement Markings & Signage Item Cost 1 Right of Way Preparation 41 STA $ 3,000.00 $ 123,000 2 Unclassified Street Excavation 7,300 CY $ 20.00 $ 146,000 3 3" HMAC (Type "D ") 17,200 SY $ 18.00 $ 309,600 4 10" Flex Base 19,900 SY $ 18.00 $ 358,200 5 6" Moisture Conditioned Subgrade 19,900 SY $ 4.00 $ 79,600 6 TX -5 Geogrid 19,900 SY $ 1.00 $ 19,900 7 6" Monolithic Concrete Curb & Gutter 8,140 LF $ 25.00 $ 203,500 8 4" Concrete Sidewalk and Ramps 6,800 SY $ 50.00 $ 340,000 9 Block Sodding and Topsoil 6,780 SY $ 5.00 $ 33,900 Item No. Item Description Pct. Of Paving Allowance Item Cost 10 Pavement Markings & Signage 2% $ 32,300 11 Traffic Control 5% $ 80,700 12 Erosion Control 3% $ 48,500 13 Drainage Improvements (RCP, Inlets, MH, Outfalls) 20% $ 322,800 Item No. Item Description Notes Allowance Item Cost 14 Landscaping /Illumination None $ - $ - 15 Drainage Structures 1 Minor Crossing $ 100,000 $ 100,000 16 Bridge Structures None $ - $ - 17 Traffic Signals None $ $ - 18 Other None $ $ Item Description Construction Engineering /Survey /Testing Right -of -Way Acquisition 2017 Impact Fee Update City of Schertz I, II, & 111 Construction Subtotal: $ 2,198,000 Mobilization 5% $ 109,900 Contineencv 10% $ 230,800 Notes Allowance Item Cost - $ 2,538,700 7% $ 177,700 Cost per sq. ft.: $ 0.75 $ 61,000 $ 61,000 Freese and Nichols, Inc. Updated: 612017 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: City Manager's Officer Agenda No. 10 Subject: Ordinance No. 17 -R -108 — Consideration and /or action approving a Resolution supporting the filing by the Texas Department of Transportation of an application with the Alamo Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Improvement Program funded through the Surface Transportation Program — Metro Mobility; pledging that if an award is received the City of Schertz is committed to providing funding, authorizing the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Schertz in all matters related to the application. (B. James /K. Woodlee) The Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization has issued a call for Surface Transportation Program- Metro Mobility (STP -MM) Project Funding. The deadline for submittal for projects for the FY 2019 -2022 TIP (Transportation Improvement Program) is December 4, 2017. The City of Schertz currently has the following funded projects: FM 1103, FM 1518 Phase 1, and Hike and Bike Trail. Improvements. During the initial. FM 1518 discussions, the need to fund Phase 2 has always been a priority but would require TXDOT to take the lead and also provide a portion of the overmatch funding. Over the last several months, TXDOT has been working towards a goal of submitting Phase 2 of the FM 1518 project but had not positively identified their portion of the matching funds. City Staff has been supportive of the concept and has requested confirmation from TXDOT of their ability to match funding. The City received verbal confirmation from TXDOT on November 9, 2017 that the City would need to provide an overmatch $5 million for Phase 2 and that TXDOT would provide an overmatch of $5 million, as each entity had done for Phase 1. There is an additional $5 million that may be needed that would need to come from either TXDOT, the City of Schertz, or from another entity. TXDOT is working with Bexar County who may wish to participate. If not, then the City and TXDOT would need to determine where those funds would come from. There are two primary benefits of advancing the FM 1518 project from a two phase project to a single phase project. The first is to complete the project 5 years sooner, thus relieving traffic congestion in a timelier schedule. The second is to save on future cost inflation, which can be as high as 5% per year. Regionally, this inflation could be higher due to materials and labor shortages for capital projects over the next decade due to private sector demand and major public works rebuilding associated with Hurricane Harvey in the greater San Antonio /Austin /Houston markets. Moving Phase 2 forward could result in a total project savings of $5 -10 million. Voters of Schertz approved $5 million in General Obligation bonds to be used for FM 1.51.8 improvements. These funds were used as part of a previous TIP submittal which also included a City Council Memorandum Page 2 $5 million match from TxDOT. The project was approved for an additional $9,500,000 in funding, bring the total project funding to $1.9.5 million, nearly four times what the City was providing. By committing up to another $5 million, the City is once again hoping to leverage these funds for additional funds from other sources so that FM 151.8 can be entirely improved as one project. In this case, it is hoped that we can leverage $20 million additional funding from outside agencies. By leveraging the City's $1.0 million investment, the total project funding would be $45 million, more than four times what the City would be providing. Constructing all of the improvements at one time reduces the impact of residents and brings about these much needed improvements earlier and at a lower total cost. Additionally, the amount of projects competing for funding and the amount of match funding from other sources can vary. As such, when improvements are warranted, whenever possible it can be beneficial to leverage City funding for match money as it may not be available in the future. Goal Approval of Resolution 17 -R -1.08. Community Benefit By providing a commitment of an additional $5,000,000 for FM 1518, the City hopes to leverage its total contribution of $1.0,000,000 so that all the proposed improvements to FM 1.51.8 the total project cost which is estimated to be around $45,000,000 can be constructed at one time. Summary of Recommended Action Staff recommends Council approve resolution 17 -R -108 obligating the City to provide an additional $5,000,000 if the project is awarded additional funding as part of the upcoming TIP. FISCAL IMPACT The City has the additional bonding capacity for this $5,000,000 obligation. Staff is recommending at this time that if the project is funded as part of the upcoming TIP to construct all of the FM 1518 improvements, that the City issues Certificates of Obligation bonds for this project in light of the fact that voters have already approved General Obligation bonds for $5,000,000 to fund the phase 1 improvements and residents continue to emphasize FM 1518 as a high priority RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Ordinance 17 -R -108. ATTACHMENTS Resolution 17 -M -108 RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -108 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, SUPPORTING THE FILING BY THE TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAION OF AN APPLICATION WITH THE ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FUNDED THROUGH THE SURFACE TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM — METRO MOBILITY; PLEDGING THAT IF AN AWARD IS RECEIVED THE CITY OF SCHERTZ IS COMMITTED TO PROVIDING FUNDING; AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ IN ALL MATTERS RELATED TO THE APPLICATION; AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH THAT: WHEREAS, the AAMPO TIP Project - FM 1518 from IH 10 to FM 78 is being submitted by TXDOT for advanced funding of Phase 2; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz understands the importance of building community partnerships and working with all interested public and private organizations and citizens in developing successful local and regional plans, priorities and funding strategies; and WHEREAS, the 2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Vision includes enhancing the safety of the traveling public, advancing alternative modes of transportation, ensuring environmental quality, and increasing accessibility for all users; and WHEREAS, the 2040 Metropolitan. Transportation. Plan Goals include identify opportunities to improve and enhance the regional transportation system, increasing the efficiency of the transportation system and decrease traffic congestion, supporting economic activity, employment growth and encouraging innovative partnerships, ensuring that transportation planning efforts are coordinated with local land use plans to support future growth and development patterns, and maintaining a focus on safety; and WHEREAS, the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) is pursuing a Joint Base San Antonio Regional Joint Land Use Study Implementation Strategy that seeks to integrate the JBSA - Randolph Joint Land Use Study from July 2015 into a combined JLUS for all of JBSA; and WHEREAS, the Regional JLUS Implementation Strategy (RJIS) #2 is to utilize capital improvement and infrastructure systems planning for stronger interagency communication /coordination on regional growth and management; and WHEREAS, the movement of people and freight are critical to the metropolitan area's economic vitality and quality of life, as well as to the on -going mission at Joint Base San Antonio- Randolph, and the military community in the AACOG region; and WHEREAS, FM 1518 currently has significant congestion and the land uses will continue to develop along the FM 1.51.8 corridor between FM 78 and I -10; and WHEREAS, FM 1518 is an access corridor for JBSA- Randolph; and WHEREAS, Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization, TXDOT, and the City of Schertz have partnered to address the transportation needs of the traveling public and the military along the FM 151.8 corridor; and WHEREAS, FM 1.51.8 is currently under design and has funding for right of way acquisition and limited operational improvements but would require a future phase 2 to be completed; and WHEREAS, the costs increases associated with delaying FM 1518 construction are significant due to inflation and increased congestion impacting the roadway during construction; and WHEREAS, the voters of the City of Schertz passed a bond measure on November 3, 2015, authorizing the City Council to issue bonds for the purpose of making Phase 1 public improvements to FM 1518 in the amount of $5 million; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has allocated sufficient bond capacity within the City's Bond Capacity Model for Phase 2 over match funding; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz is determined to support the FM 1518 improvements project being submitted by TXDOT and to provide an additional over match in the amount of $5 million, bringing the total over match amount to $10 million from the City of Schertz, in order to advance the :Phase 2 project into a single phased construction project in order to lower overall cost and more quickly address traffic congestion; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY OF SCHERTZ CITY COUNCIL, that: The voters of the City of Schertz passed a bond measure on November 3, 2015, authorizing the City Council to issue bonds for the purpose of making Phase 1 public improvements to FM 1518 in the amount of $5 million; and The City of Schertz has allocated sufficient bond capacity within the City's Bond Capacity Model for Phase 2 over match funding; and The City of Schertz is determined to support the FM 1518 improvements project being submitted by TXDOT and to provide an additional over match in the amount of $5 million, bringing the total over match amount to $10 million from the City of Schertz, in order to advance the Phase 2 project into a single phased construction project in order to lower overall cost and more quickly address traffic congestion; and Authorizing the City Manager to act on behalf of the City of Schertz in all matters related to the application. PASSED AND APPROVED, this 28th day of November, 2017. ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor -3- Agenda No. 11 CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: Engineering Subject: Resolution No. 17 -R -109 — A Resolution by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, authorizing an agreement for a Temporary Construction License across property owned by Schertz - Cibolo- Universal City Independent School District BACKGROUND In March, 2015, the City of Schertz agreed to the purchase of approximately 4.138 acres of property located off of Schaefer Road and the future extension of Ray Corbett Drive. The land is the site of the proposed one - million gallon elevated water storage tank and the future three - million gallon ground storage tank and booster station. Access to the site will be primarily from the existing end of Ray Corbett Drive, across a proposed access easement that runs along the future Ray Corbett Drive extension alignment. That easement is currently pending approval by the current property owner — the Board of Schertz- Cibolo- Universal City Independent School District (SCUCISD) and will be accepted by the City in conjunction with the platting of the tank site property. Prior to the property plat being finalized and recordation of the easement, the City has a need to access the site in order to prepare for development and to place available fill material that is currently available. Upon request by City Staff, SCUCISD administration has offered to allow access across district property via a Temporary Construction License agreement. The agreement stipulates that it will remain in effect until the earlier of execution of the easement, the completion of construction work, or March 31, 2018. . It is expected that the earliest of those events will be the easement execution. Goal Approval of Resolution Number 17 -R -1.09 authorizing the City Manager to execute the Temporary Construction License across SCUCISD property. Community :Benefit The license agreement will allow the City to have access to the Corbett elevated tank site in order to prepare for development and to place material that is currently available for the City's use at no cost. That has the potential to reduce the amount of fill material needed for construction of the tank. Summary of Recommended Action City staff recommends approval of Resolution Number 17 -R -109 authorizing the Temporary Construction License agreement. FISCAL IMPACT There is no fiscal impact associated with this action. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution No. 17 -R -1.09 ATTACHMENT(S) • Resolution No. 17 -R -109 • Temporary Construction License RESOLUTION NO. 17 -R -109 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING AN AGREEMENT FOR A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE ACROSS PROPERTY OWNED BY SCHERTZ- CIBOLO- UNIVERSAL CITY INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT IN CONNECTION WITH THE CORBETT TANK PROJECT, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the "City ") has recommended that the City enter into an agreement for a Temporary Construction License across property owned by Schertz- Cibolo- Universal City Independent School District (SCUCISD), a political subdivision of the State of Texas (the "Licensor "), in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Agreement'); and WHEREAS, the City owns a piece of property most easily accessible across property currently owned by the Licensor; and WHEREAS, the City needs to gain access to its property on which it plans to construct the Corbett Elevated Water Storage Tank, Ground Storage Tank, and Booster Station in order to place material and prepare for development of the site; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into the Agreement for Temporary Construction License. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Agreement with the Licensor in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A and to accept the Temporary Construction License in accordance with the terms of the Agreement. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this 28th day of November, 2017. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Michael R. Carpenter, Mayor ATTEST: Brenda Dennis, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE RESOLUTION 17 -R -109 EXHIBIT A 3. Rikhts Reserved. Licensor retains, reserves and shall continue to enjoy the use of the License Property for any and all purposes, including, without limitation, the right of ingress and egress. 4. No Third Party Beneficiary. This License inures to the benefit of and obligates only the parties executing it. No term or provision of this License shall benefit or obligate any person or entity not a party to it. The parties hereto shall cooperate fully in opposing any attempt by any third person or entity to claim any benefit, protection, release or other consideration under this License. 5. Severability. In the event that any of the terms or conditions of this License shall be deemed invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the validity of the remainder of this License shall in no way be affected and shall remain in full force and effect to the fullest extent permitted by law. 6. Governing Law. This License shall be governed by and interpreted under the laws of the State of Texas. Venue is in the County where the License Property is located. 7. Counter arts. This License may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together, shall constitute one and the same instrument. 8. Care. Licensee agrees to use due care in any use of the License herein granted and in the construction, installation, repair, replacement and maintenance of Licensee's improvements and the License Property as provided for herein so as not to unreasonably disturb Licensor's use of its property. 9. Indemni . To the extent allowed by the laws of the State of Texas Licensee will hold Licensor harmless from, and defend Licensor against, any claims, losses, causes of action, and suits which arise from Licensee's, its agents', employees' or invitees' acts or omissions, including but not limited to the use of the License herein granted and will indemnify Licensor for any losses suffered due to any such claims, losses, causes of action or suit, excluding any negligence or misconduct by Licensor, its agents, employees or invitees. REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK SIGNATURES TO FOLLOW By: EXHIBIT A to TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION LICENSE Licensor's Tract/ Licensee's Tract/ Temporary Construction License See Attached EXHIMT A Paue 2 of 2 { 1 3 Date: March fit , 2017 Pro j ect o: H 24.880 101 Exhibit A 109,27 "a YFO17IVE 511,11", IN SAN' ANTON10,TX 7 217 11, ( "-!l l) 54)o- ,17.17 1° g „,eltl) EXHIBIT A Exhibit A2 Exhibit NG.-INC_ CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: November 28, 2017 Department: City Manager's Officer Agenda No. 16 Subject: Updated information regarding the old school house. (Information requested by Mayor Pro -Tem Edwards) Staff requested additional information from Maggie Titterington based on her comments at the October 10, 2017 City Council meeting about the status of the Lower Valley School House at Northeast Lakeview College. Ms. Titterington provided the following information and directed staff to officials with Northeast Lakeview College for more specific answers. Staff has reached out to Northeast Lakeview College for more information and will provide a subsequent update if they have additional information. From: Maggie Titterington <president @thechamber.info> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 11:13 AM To: Brenda Dennis Subject: school house The Lower Valley Schoolhouse project began in 2008 when the executors of the Watt's (Lutrell and Maxine) donated it to Northeast Lakeview College in the hopes that funds would be raised to renovate it and use it to teach Texas history to fourth grade students. Dr. Reno and Trevino headed up the committee. The committee was made up of former students such as Lewis Borgfeld, Dorothy Atkinson as well as community leaders such as Gail Douglass, Jan Haynie, Elizabeth Kuhlmann, Gary Birdwell and myself. I came onto the Committee around 2012. Schertz Magazine did an extensive article on the fundraising efforts in the January 2013 . issue to include what the refurbished school house would look like. The committee reached out through presentations at Chamber luncheons - North Chamber, Randolph Metrocom Chamber and Schertz Chamber, the Northeast Partnership, Garden Ridge Lions Club as well as city council meetings for Schertz and Cibolo. Assistance was sought through grants through GVEC, HEB Foundation, Terracon, Kleberg, Halff, Coates, Rotary, Kiwanis, Summerlee and Goldsbury to name a few. Partnerships were sought through contractors and companys to work in trade, barter, sponsor or discount. Caterpillar, O'Haver, AAA Auger, Bartlett Cocke and Marmonk Architects are just a few of many reached out to. City Council Memorandum Page 2 As of 2012, the estimate to fix the schoolhouse was $500,000. It included $100,000 for the entry, $50,000 each for the two classrooms, east and west porch - $15,000 each, outhouses (detached restrooms) $15,000, architecture and building cost fees - $24, 500 each, asbestos and lead abatement - $93,500 and furniture, fixtures and equipment - $112,500. Sponsorship packets were distributed seeking sponsors for all aspects of the project as individual pieces to the whole. Even creative sponsorships such as a chalkboard recognition of donations with names was proposed to bricks with names on it. Northeast Lakeview fronted monies for the move of the schoolhouse to the property as well as other expenses that, to date, have left them $300.000 in the hole.I know money raised paid for the asbestos and lead paint abatement. There is $70,000 left in the funds raised. Now, 5 years later, a rough guesstimate of the renovations is at $800,000. There is now massive deterioration and termites. The committee felt that it had exhausted all efforts and thought to seek assistance with the thought that the school district and city could form a partnership, taking over and incorporating the schoolhouse as a historic visiting feature. But of course, this is monies, time, placement and responsibility that budgets have not allotted for as well as WHOSE responsibility would the maintenance and upkeep be. It is because of these realities that the committee has sunset the project. We are now seeking to salvage what items are left to incorporate into the school offices and the Schertz Visitors Center. Maggie Titterington, IOM President - The Chamber (S chertz-Cibolo- Selma Area) 210 -619 -1.950 Philippians 4:13 "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has overcome." Booker T. Washington