Loading...
02-04-2019 BOA Agenda with Associated DocumentsSCHERTZ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 City of Schertz Core Values Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you would want to be treated Work together cooperatively as a team 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED 3. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes for the October 22, 2018 Regular Meeting. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing related to variance requests within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, and the adjoining property owners affected by the applicants request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Board will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Board will act on the applicant's request. A. BOA201.8 -009 A request for a variance to UDC Sec. 21.9.83 Fences in Nonresidential and Multifamily Areas, 2. Fence Materials, b. Prohibited Materials to allow the installation of an electric security fence, located at 17454 Campus Drive, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. 6 Q10101110410101 114121 KY� A. Announcements by Members • City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended B. Announcements by City Staff City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended Board of Adjustment February 4, 2019 Page 1 of 2 Committee of Committee Advisory Board (CCAB) December 19, 2018 Meeting Summary 6. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING CERTIFICATION I, Emily Delgado, Planner of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the lsr day of February, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code. E� Emily Delgado, Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Board of Adjustment was removed from the official bulletin board on day of , 2019. title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619 -1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Board of Adjustment for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(e) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. Board of Adjustment February 4, 2019 Page 2 of 2 BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES October 22, 2018 The Schertz Board of Adjustment convened on October 22, 2018 at 6:00 P.M. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT Richard Dziewit, Chairman Earl Hartzog Reginna Agee Danielene Salas BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT David Reynolds, Vice Chairman Frank McElroy Ricky Haynes 1. Call to Order /Roll Call: Mr. Dziewit called the re; present. 2. Seat Alternate to Act if Danielene Salas was seat, 3. Consent Agenda: A. Minutes for the Augur Mr. Hartzog moved to ap seconded the motion. Th( 4. Public Hearing: A. BOA2018 -007 CITY STAFF Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Dev. Bryce Cox, Senior Planner Nick Konlvav City Attorney Chandler Signs, to order at 6:03 P.M. and recognized members 8 Regular Meeting. the August 27, 2018 regular meeting. Mrs. Agee was 4 -0. Motion carried. A request for variances to UDC Sec.21.11.9 Wall Signs, in order to permit a) two additional wall signs including a second primary sign for a total of five wall signs, b) increased primary wall sign maximum area, c) allowance of more than one sign per wall, and d) allowance of one primary wall sign to extend above the roofline, located at 18658 1 -35N, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mitchell Roberts- CEO & Founder of EVO Entertainment Minutes Board of Adjustment October 22, 2018 Page 1 of 3 Public Hearing was opened at 6:12 P.M. There were no residents that spoke. Public Hearing was closed at 6:13 P.M. There was a lengthy Discussion. Mrs. Agee moved to deny the BOA2018 -007 item A. Mr. motion. The vote was 4 -1 with Mrs. Salas voted nay. The Mr. Hartzog moved to deny the BOA2018 -007 item B. M motion. The vote was 4 -1 with Mrs. Salas voted nay. The Mrs. Agee moved to approved the BOA2018 -007 item C. motion. The vote was 4 -1 with Mrs. Salas voted nay. The Mr. Hartzog moved to deny the BOA2018 -007 item B. M motion. The vote was 4 -1 with Mrs. Salas voted nay. The Hartzog seconded the variance request was denied. rs. Agee seconded the variance request was denied. Mr. Hartzog seconded the variance request was denied. rs. Agee seconded the variance reauest was denied. B. BOA2018 -008 A request for a variance to UDC Sec.21.11.1 OB Maximum Area of Freestanding Ground Signs to allow a freestanding ground sign with a maximum area of 480 square feet at 19513 1-3 5N, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Hearing was opened at 6:54 P Tuner- 940 Eichler St. New Braunfels, TX Public Hcarine was closed at 6:56 P.M. There was a lengthy Discussion. Mr. Hartzog moved to deny the BOA2018 -008. Mrs. Agee seconded the motion. The vote was 4 -1 with Mrs. Salas voted nay. The variance request was denied. 5. Announcements: A. Announcements by Members No Board member spoke. Minutes Board of Adjustment October 22, 2018 Page 2 of 3 B. Announcements by City Staff No Staff member spoke. 6. Adjournment of the Regular Meeting: The meeting adjourned at 7:15 P.M. Chairman, Board of Adjustment Secretary, City of Schertz Minutes Board of Adjustment October 22, 2018 Page 3 of 3 TO: Board of Adjustment .FTi1'iTo�"i CASE: BOA 2018 - 00917454 Campus Drive SUBJECT: A request for a variance to UDC Sec. 21.9.8.8 Fences in Nonresidential and Multifamily Areas, 2. Fence Materials, b. Prohibited Materials to allow the installation of an electric security fence, located at 17454 Campus Drive, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Southeastern Freight Lines Applicant: Electric Guard Dog LLC, Nikki Huggins, Compliance Manager Authorized Agent: Electric Guard Dog LLC, Michael Pate REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variance to UDC Sec. 21.9.8.13 Fences in Nonresidential and Multifamily Areas, 2. Fence Materials, b. Prohibited Materials to allow the installation of an electric security fence. PUBLIC NOTICE: The public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express on January 16, 2019. There were five (5) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on January 22, 2019. At the time of this staff report zero responses to the request have been received. ITEM SUMMARY: The subject property is an approximately 5 acre tract of land with one building totaling approximately 17,000 square feet — 3,500 square feet is utilized for office space and 13,500 square feet is utilized for heavy equipment servicing. The applicant is requesting a variance to UDC Sec. 21.9.8.B.2.b, Fences Nonresidential and Multifamily Areas: Prohibited Materials, in order to install an electric fence security system along the perimeter of the property. The applicant is proposing to install an electric fence security system approximately 3 -12 inches inside the existing perimeter chain link fence at Southeastern Freight Lines, located at 17454 Campus Drive. The proposed fence would be a minimum of 6 feet tall and would be powered by a 12V marine battery and solar panel. Currently, UDC Sec. 21.9.8.B.2.b states above - ground electrical fencing, wire mesh (such as hog wire or chicken wire), screening slats within chain link fences and barbed wire are prohibited except for parcels or lots one (1) acre or greater in size in conjunction with the containment of livestock or farm animals. The land use of the subject property does not involve the containment of livestock or farm animals, and therefore the installation of an electric fence at the subject property is prohibited. SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION ZONING AND LAND USE: The property is located at 17454 Campus Drive and is currently an office /heavy equipment service facility. Existing Zoning Existing Use General Business II (GB -2) and Office /Heavy Equipment Service Manufacturinq Light (M -1) Existing Zoning North Right -of -way South General Business II (GB -2) East Right -of -way West General Business II (GB -2) and Manufacturina Liaht (M -1) Existing Use Campus Drive Undeveloped FM 3009 Office /Warehouse CRITERIA FOR REVIEW: According to UDC, Article 3, Sections 21.3.4.C, In order to make a finding of hardship and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following: The requested variance does violate the intent of this UDC or its amendments; UDC Article 9 Site Design Standards is intended to enhance property values, maintain aesthetic attractiveness, and promote commercial opportunity in the City, and to support and further the objectives of the City's Comprehensive Land Plan. The variance does not meet the intent of the UDC because the requested electric fence is not being used for the containment of livestock and is expressly prohibited by the UDC. 2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features exits that are peculiar to the subject parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district; The purpose of a variance is to acknowledge the special circumstances particular to the subject property. The subject property is not influenced by conditions that are unique to the land or that prevent the business from functioning without an electric fence. 3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or 4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto does not deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions. The property has no special circumstances or unique conditions which would deprive it of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district which comply with the same provisions; all properties within the City of Schertz are held to the same electric fence regulations. The requested variance conflicts with the provisions of the UDC. STAFF ANALYSIS STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends denial of BOA 2018.009. The request for a variance does not comply with the approval criteria for granting a variance as presented above. N Planning Department Recommendation Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* X I Denial * While the Board can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. Attachments: Aerial location map Public hearing notice map Exhibits CASE NUMBER CITY OF SCHERTZ VARIANCE CHECKLIST APPLICATION COMPLETENESS REQUIREMENTS: • Fees including breakdown of calculations on a separate sheet • Development Application signed by owner and notarized • This checklist (signed by applicant /representative) • One (1) set of plans (11" x 8 1/2 ") prepared in accordance with the checklist One (1) compact disc of all exhibits /applications electronically scanned (pdf and jpg) * *Do not leave any items unchecked ** 16- Variance Checklist Updated 10.2009 Page 1 of 2 4 V 6 C W U TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS � o a � 1 A survey of the subject property showing property dimensions, building locations, X setback dimensions, and other applicable information. _V/ X 2 Photos or additional information deemed appropriate for justification. V 3 If homeowner's association is in effect, provide an affidavit from an authorized representative of the association certifying that the association has approved the X requested variance. V 4 Such other information as the City Planning Department or the Board of Adjustment Members may require to determine full compliance with the UDC and X other applicable ordinances of the City. V X 5 Description of the requested variance and hardship. V V X 6 justification for the requested variance. V V 7 Site Plan and elevation drawing of the proposed sign, dimensions, materials, colors, caption of the proposed sign, and such other data (such as lighting) as are pertinent X to the application. Pictures and other back up documentation may be requested. V 8 Provide the following information: type of proposed sign (monument, free - standing, building, directory, etc.), dimensions of building face elevation (height and length), X square feet of each sign requested. V X 9 Show detail if illuminated, or add a statement indicating no illumination will be used. V X 10 Legend for abbreviations or symbols used. V 16- Variance Checklist Updated 10.2009 Page 1 of 2 CASE NUMBER Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory building and non - conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following criteria. State how your request meets these conditions. Description of variance request: Request for variance is to Article 9: Section 21.9.8. B Fences in Nonresidential and Multifamily Areas, 2. Fence Materials, b. Prohibited Materials. We are requesting to install a 10' 12V /DC battery operated, low- voltage electric security fence as part of a monitored alarm system Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of right commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? ❑ Yes 0 No Explain: See attached explanation 2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? ❑ Yes 0 No Explain: See attached explanation 3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant's own actions or intended for financial interest? ❑ Yes ® No Explain: See attached explanation 4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity? ❑ Yes ® No Explain: See attached explanation Preparer's Signature: Printed Name: Date prepared: 16- Variance Checklist Updated 10.2009 Page 2 of 2 VARIANCE CRITERIA RESPONSE — Southeastern Freight Lines 1. Does the reauested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions? Response: The requested variance does not violate the current or any future intent of the Unified Development Code. Electric fences are allowed on parcels of greater than one acre; the property requesting the variance is three acres. The interpretation allows for electric fences in conjunction with the containment of livestock or farm animals. The requested variance is for a security fence powered by a 12 -volt DC battery and should not have to be used in conjunction with livestock or animals to keep the criminal class from burglarizing or vandalizing Southeastern Freight Lines — a tax paying business and employer in the City of Schertz. The implied use of animals to ward off the criminal class in conjunction with an electric fence is not an effective form of security. The Electric Guard Dog security fence is proven to be safe and effective as a security deterrent. The remote location of the property and the high value targets secured therein are an open invitation to the criminal class. The only system that actually PREVENTS crime and break -ins is the Electric Guard Dog security system. Southeastern Freight Lines believes the variance is of the utmost importance to the protection of their business and inventory. Response: 2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts? The subject property in question is unique in the following ways: a. High value of inventory— both the equipment and inventory; Southeastern Freight Lines is a nationwide reputable freight company with high value inventory and equipment. b. Due to size and nature of items, most must be stored outside and cannot be protected inside a building. The subject area is 2,100 linear feet in perimeter; it is not possible for security guards to effectively and constantly monitor the entire lot. c. Also due to size, without the security system being sought, it is very easy to obtain access without being seen by patrolling Policemen or a neighborhood watch. d. The business is a reputable business, located in the appropriate zoning and complies with all other ordinances. If approved, the variance authorized will be consistent with the general purpose and intent of the provision from which the variance is sought as the general safety and welfare of the public is maintained, crime is prevented, and the city can police crime other than property break -ins and vandalism. 3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant's own actions or intended for financial interest? Response: This variance is not being sought to relieve illegal acts or self- imposed hardships. The business is a reputable business, located in the appropriate zoning and complies with all other ordinances. If approved, the variance authorized will be consistent with the general purpose and intent of the provision from which the variance is sought as the general safety and welfare of the public is maintained, crime is prevented, and the city can police crime other than property break -ins and vandalism. 4. Would erantine this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or iniurious to the value of arooerty in the vicinity? Response: The granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of the property in the vicinity of Southeastern Freight Lines. In actuality the installation of the Electric Guard Dog will secure the variance property and increase the security of the surrounding properties and the immediate area by deterring the criminal element. It will be in be in harmony with the general purpose and intent of the approved standards and regulations for the installation of the Electric Guard Dog system. Electric Guard Dog has made a name for ourselves by protecting companies like this one from criminals, we have a certain way of setting up our system fences that is safe to the public and allows for maximum protection of our clients. We are tested and certified through a Nationally Recognized Testing Laboratory (TUV). This is why the client has elected to use our service to protect the business; we have the expertise and experience in creating defense systems that are both safe and effective. Variance Request — Southeastern Freight Lines, Schertz TX We are requesting a variance to install an electric fence security system (Electric Guard Dog aka EGD) approximately 3 -12 inches inside /behind the existing perimeter chain link fence at Southeastern Freight Lines located at 17454 Campus Dr., Schertz TX. The EGD Security system is an electrically charged fence powered by 12V marine battery which is charged by a solar panel. An energizer retains the voltage for 1.3 seconds and thus when released it is boosted to 7,000 volts of a totally safe, pulsed electrical charge. Signage posted a minimum of every 30 feet warns of the electric fence. However, the safety of the 'shock' is not advertised and therefore, due to our inherent fear of electricity, most criminals will not take a chance in breeching the perimeter. With this, the EGD proactively deters crime unlike cameras, beams and alarms that react to a crime in commission. This genre of business is a high target for crime due to the fact that their yard contains highly desirable, easily'fenceable' inventory of commercial materials and equipment. Currently, Southeastern Freight Lines has a chain link fence around the perimeter of the property for security and to prevent intruders. This security system has proven ineffective. Many businesses in this industry use 'electric fence' security systems to effectively protect their property where other systems have failed. Essential safety facts regarding Electric Guard Dog fence • Totally independent of city electrical grid — does not plug in to the electrical grid /mains power • Powered by 12V marine battery and solar panel • Totally enclosed inside perimeter fence of 6' minimum height • Only installed to secure outdoor storage lots • Pulsed current, shock delivered every 1.3 seconds for one -ten thousandth of a second • Shortness of duration makes it very safe • Fully tested and approved by: • TUV, a Nationally Recognized Testing Lab • Dr. Webster, University of Wisconsin, the leading expert in pulsed electricity • Adheres to International Standard IEC 60336.2.76 of which the United States is a supporting member NORME INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD CEI IEC 60335 -2 -76 Edition 2,1 2006 -04 Edition 2:2002 consolidee par I'amendement 1:2006 Edition 2:2002 consolidated with amendment 1:2006 Appareils electrodomestiques et analogues — Securite — Partie 2 -76: Regles particulieres pour les electrificateurs de cl6tures Household and similar electrical appliances — Safety — Part 2 -76: Particular requirements for electric fence energizers Numero de reference Reference number CEIIIEC 60335 -2- 76:2002 +A1:2006 Customer: robert Calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company, Order No.: WS -2007- 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iee.ch - Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11 GRAPHIC S C :A LEI 40 0 20 40 80 160 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 40 ft. 00 ■ #- ••« PI #:/ 1nn2��1988 (l. OM) I i VA SECURITY SYSTEM i 17454 CAMPUS DRIVE SCHERTZ, TX • s 6, i ' i l� EXISTING FENCE TO REMAIN K /SECURITY SYSTEM 6 " -12" MAX. ' FROM PERIMETER FENCE ,. - - - - -- ' ECURITY SYSTEM -V" 12" 0,AX,F'ROM PERIMETER FENCE 1 i 4 � rn 1 � 1 o0 r 7 I Southeastern Freight Lines 17454 Campus Drive Schertz, TX 78154 STORM DRAIN: THERE IS NO EXISTING STORM DRAIN ADJACENT TO THE PROPERTY, NO STORM DRAIN IS BEING PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. UTILITY RIGHT -OF -WAY /EASEMENTS NOTE: THERE ARE UTILITY RIGHT -OF -WAY OR EASEMENTS LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY, DRAINAGE /IRRIGATION NOTE: THIS PROPERTY IS NOT LOCATED IN THE 100 -YEAR FLOOD ZONE. THERE ARE NO IRRIGATION OR DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON THE PROPERTY, LANDSCAPE /RESERVATIONS NOTE: ALL COMMON AREA LANDSCAPE WILL BE MAINTAINED BY A LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE ASSOCIATION. THERE ARE NO RESERVATIONS FOR PARKS, SCHOOLS OR OTHER PUBLIC USES. ROW LINE CENTERLINE PROPERTY LINE SETBACK LANDSCAPE EASEMENT EXISTING SCREEN FENC EXISTING FENCE ------------ ­ ----- ____._--a___ ____m ______ -. _ _.._r -a_- PROPOSED SECURITY SYSTEM (SENSOR ONLY) PL SECURITY SYSTEM C -12" MAX 1 00 I 00 I EXISTING FENCE I 1 � EXISTING ONSITE GRADE EXISTING PEKIMETER FENCE SECTION NTS, SECURITY SYSTEM I C -12" MAX: EXISTING FENCE EXISTING ONSITE GRADE EXISTING PEKI METE2 FENCE SECTION NTS SECURITY SYSTEM C -12" MAX. EXISTING FENCE- - EXISTING ONSITE GRADE EXISTING PEKIMETE2 FENCE SECTION NTS EXISTING OFFSITE GROUND EXISTING OFFSITE GROUND EXISTING OFFSITE GROUND LS = LANDSCAPE AREA NOTES: POLE LOCATIONS STEEL POLES: TO BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY ON EACH SIDE OF GATE(S) & EVERY 90' (OR GREATER) TURN IN SYSTEM LINE. FIBERGLASS /INTERMEDIATE POLES: TO BE LOCATED APPROXIMATELY EVERY 30' DISCLAIMER: POLE LOCATIONS MAY SLIGHTLY DEVIATE FROM STIPULATIONS ABOVE DUE TO ON -SITE CONDITIONS" 1 # I DATE / DESCRIPTION 1 0) i 0 i' O � �+ M Moo ^N0 Lr) W N i r i •r Was F_ C) w O rY 0- t=- F-- w w U) Z J a. W H W DATE: APR. 26, 2018 SCALE: 1" = 40' SHEET i i' Was F_ C) w O rY 0- t=- F-- w w U) Z J a. W H W DATE: APR. 26, 2018 SCALE: 1" = 40' SHEET z r'T1' z IE° e4 TO PROJECT: REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE A SECURITY SYSTEM .0m 0: m m 17454 CAMPUS DRIVE O 4�js G`.F°tf SCHERTZ, TX 78154 o a z PI #: 361504 mn N O °» 2 O .� 0 0 rn v 5 y W m TYPICAL DETAILS ' w c �. x IE° 0 rn 1i 6 • 4 R 4 4 • MM i il4 i R Electric Guard Dog 550 Assembly St., 5th Floor Columbia, SC 29201 PHONE: 803- 786 -6333 FAX: 803- 404 -5378 i • i � 4 ! R R e4 g PROJECT: REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE A SECURITY SYSTEM M m m 17454 CAMPUS DRIVE i � R 4 a SCHERTZ, TX 78154 o a z PI #: 361504 mn N O W1 O SHEET TITLE: TYPICAL DETAILS 0 rn 1i 6 • 4 R 4 4 • MM i il4 i R Electric Guard Dog 550 Assembly St., 5th Floor Columbia, SC 29201 PHONE: 803- 786 -6333 FAX: 803- 404 -5378 i • i � 4 ! R R °> 0 0 0 A z e4 i • # i � R 4 i • ,i °> 0 0 0 A z M M W � N 0 n D D � r m M z> D N ON N 0 co MENNEWWW-1 e a 7 0 M rn x C� D rr► • .5 • w 7 T 0 T FT 1 0 T � T T 0 Ti CSI C7 U) D N r .. C C3� O m O C/') T C7 Z � C) -G D C) -C O C7 N n N N Cj N T N Cn O —I FT I X X 0 X X T r FT-1 I =1 n C 6'i F C ! Fq C7 ITI �7 Z �7 IT► Ad {I r — — r t a ' ' r T - �( (� 5 -0 r O O �-{ � C T r1 Cf) Z ---I D � O z f t-61) t 9f rx 7 O f /1 1 (MIS O (MIN) CU F-- d �-:...TTTNT _ y zDF F— CC) o .. C-) rn � _ O � r I- V � O rT D O � � D � QD� O D z I— T-� O r D o C X Cn FrI CC N C/) D o! 0 T = D m -� PROJECT:REQUEST TO AUTHORIZE CAMPUS SCHERTZ, TX 78154 361504 SHEET TITLE: TYPICAL DETAILS Electric Guard Dog 550 Assembly St., 5th Floor Columbia, SC 29201 PHONE: 803- 786 -6333 FAX: 803- 404 -5378 It 0 D m 0 M Cn n 0 z 60335 -2 -76 n IEC:2002 +A1:2006 - 49 -- 22.108 Energizer output characteristics shall be such that -- the impulse repetition rate shall not exceed 1 Hz; - the impulse duration of the impulse in the 500 n component of the standard load shall not exceed 10 ms; - for energy limited energizers the energy/impulse in the 500 n component of the standard load shall not exceed 5 J; NOTE The energy/impulse is the energy measured in the impulse over the impulse duration. - for current limited energizers the output current in the 500 n component of the standard load shall not exceed for ❑ an impulse duration of greater than 0,1 ms, the value specified by the characteristic limit line detailed in Figure 102; ❑ an impulse duration of not greater than 0,1 ms, 15 700 mA. Compliance is checked by measurement when the energizer is supplied with the voltage in 11. 5, the energizer being operated under conditions of normal operation but with the standard load connected to its output terminals. When measuring the impulse repetition rate the standard load is not connected. 60335 -2 -76 n IEC:2002 +A1:2006 - 51 - The measurements are made using a measuring arrangement with an input impedance consisting of a non - inductive resistance of not less than 7 Mn in parallel with a capacitance of not more than 100 pF. 60335 -2 -76 O IEC:2002 +A1:2006 —61— N C J V N J E 100 10 0,1 0,01 100 1 000 10 000 100 000 Output current (MA) rec 322199 NOTE The equation of the line relating impulse duration (ms) to output current (mA) for 1 000 mA < output current < 15 700 MA, is given by impulse duration = 41,885 x 103 x (output current) -1,34 Figure 102 — Current limited energizer characteristic limit line Customer: robert calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company. Order No.: WS- 2007 - 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Em -,!I: custsery @iec.ch -Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11 60335 -2 -76 @ II^C2002 +A1:2006 —81 — Annex CC (informative) Installation of electric security fences CCA General An electric security fence should be installed so that, under normal conditions of operation, persons are protected against inadvertent contact with pulsed conductors. NOTE 1 This requirement is primarily intended to establish that a desirable level of safety is present or is being maintained in the physical barrier. NOTE 2 When selecting the type of physical barrier, the likely presence of young children should be a factor in considering the size of openings. CC.2 Location of electric security fence The electric fence should be separated from the public access area by means of a physical barrier. Where an electric fence is installed in an elevated position, such as on the inner side of a window or skylight, the physical barrier may be less than 1,5 m high where it covers the whole of the electric fence. If the bottom of the window or skylight is within a distance of 1,5 m from the floor or access level then the physical barrier need only extend up to a height of 1,5 m above the floor or access level. CC.3 Prohibited zone for pulsed conductors Pulsed conductors shall not be installed within the shaded zone shown in Figure CC1. NOTE 1 Where an electric security fence is planned to run close to a site boundary, the relevant government authority should be consulted before installation begins. NOTE 2 Typical electric security fence installations are shown in Figure CC2 and Figure CC3. CC.4 Separation between electric fence and physical barrier Where a physical barrier is installed in compliance with CC.3 at least one dimension in any opening should be not greater than 130 mm and the separation between the electric fence and the physical barrier should be — within the range of 100 mm to 200 mm or greater than 1 000 mm where at least one dimension in each opening in the physical barrier is not greater than 130 mm; — greater than 1 000 mm where any opening in the physical barrier has all dimensions greater than 50 mm; — less than 200 mm or greater than 1 000 mm where the physical barrier does not have any openings. NOTE 1 These restrictions are intended to reduce the possibility of persons making inadvertent contact with the pulsed conductors and to prevent them from becoming wedged between the electric fence and the physical barrier, thereby being exposed to multiple shocks from the energizer. NOTE 2 The separation is the perpendicular distance between the electric fence and the physical barrier. Customer: robert Calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS- 2007- 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iec.ch - Tel.: +4122 919 02 11 60335 -2 -76 © IEC:2002 +A1:2006 —83— CC.5 Prohibited mounting Electric fence conductors should not be mounted on a support used for any overhead power line. CC.6 Operation of electric security fence The conductors of an electric fence should not be energized unless all authorized persons, within or entering the secure area, have been informed of its location. Where there is a risk of persons being injured by a secondary cause, appropriate additional safety precautions should be taken. NOTE An example of a secondary cause is where a person may be expected to fall from a surface if contact is made with pulsed conductors. Customer: robert Calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS- 2007 - 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iec.ch - TeL +41 22 919 02 11 60335 -2 -76 © IEC:2O02 +A1:2006 —85— Key I r EC 1619105 A = Secure area B = Public access area Physical barrier Prohibited area Electric security fence Figure CCA — Prohibited area for pulse conductors Customer: robert Calton - No, of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS- 2007 - 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iec.ch - Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11 60335 -2 -76 @ IEC:2002+A1:2006 —87— 111ME j NII 3B �o 11M` of Key A = Secure area B = Public access area C = Barrier where required 1 = Electric security fence 2 = Physical barrier 0 IEC 1820105 Figure CC.2 — Typical constructions where an electric security fence is exposed to the public Customer: robert calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS -2007- 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iec.ch - Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11 0 60335 -2 -76 O jEC:2002 +A1:2006 —89— IEC 1821165 Key A = Secure area B = Public access area C = Barrier where required D = Glass window pane E = Skylight in roof 1 = Electric security fence 2 = Physical barrier Figure CC.3 — Typical fence constructions where the electric security fence is installed in windows and skylights Customer: robert Calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS -2007- 009528 - IMPORTANT: This.file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custserv@iec.ch - Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11 60335 -2 -76 © IEC:2O02 +A1:2006 —91 — Bibliography The bibliography of Part 1 is applicable except as follows. Addition: IEC 60335 -2 -86, Household and similar electrical appliances — Safety — Part 2 -86: Particular requirements for electric fishing machines IEC 60335 -2 -87, Household and similar electrical appliances — Safety — Part 2 -87: Particular requirements for electric animal stunning equipment Customer: robert calton - No. of User(s): 1 - Company: Order No.: WS- 2007 - 009528 - IMPORTANT: This file is copyright of IEC, Geneva, Switzerland. All rights reserved. This file is subject to a licence agreement. Enquiries to Email: custsery @iec.ch - Tel.: +41 22 919 02 11