Loading...
PZ 03-23-22 Agenda w associated documentsMEETING AGENDA Schertz Capital Improvement Advisory Committee AND Planning & Zoning Commission March 23, 2022 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a tea meeting at 6:00p. m., Wednesday, March 23, 2022, at the City Council Chambers. In lieu of attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live stream on the City's YouTube Channel. 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED 3. HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Each person should fill out the Speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Committee of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Residents svho choose to tvatch the rraeeting via live stream, but who would like to participate in the Hearing of Rtwi €dents, Should email their c•oanraaenis to the Planning Division, at by S:00p. m, on Tuesday, 114arch 22, 2022, so that the Planning Division arauy read the public comments into the record under the hearing gfrccidents. In the hoc�v of the email please include your name, your address, phone number, agenda item number if applicable or sul?ject (#'discussion, and your comments. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: A. ZC2022 -006 Hold a public hearing, discussion and possible action to approve a recoznmendation to the City Council regarding an amendment of land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan and imposition of an impact fee. 5. ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Planning & Zoning March 23, 2022 Page 1 of 3 HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements ofspecific factual information given in response to any inquirv, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of 'the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Residents c,,ho choose to snatch the meeting via live stream, but who would lake to participate in the Hearing gf'Rciidents, Should email their comments lo the Planning Division, at pl Haar "rtt {u sc °hertz.c °o n by S:OOp.rn. on Tues €lay, lfurch 23, 2022, so that the Planning Division nu'iy react the public corm menu into the record under the hearing of residents. In the hocty of the entail please include your name, your address, phone number, agenda item number if applicable or subject of discussion, and your c'oPT277 entS. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes for the March 9, 2022 Regular Meeting. PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report f om staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant's request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary. A. ZC2022 -004— Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan by designating approximately 142 acres of the Future Land Use Map as Industrial generally located 3,500 feet southwest of the intersection of Doerr Lane and Bell North Drive, Comal County, Texas: Property ID 77739 and designating the extension of Tejas Way as a Commercial Collector A. B. ZC2022 -005 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on amendments of Part III, Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 4 subsection 21.4.5, Article 5 subsection 21.5.2 and 21.5.5, Article subsection 21.8.9, Article 9 subsection 21.9.10 and Article 10 subsection 21.10.2 and 21.10.4. YYNIUh`>t all] . 110 11LVA111 11_11 W4141,`i]11191774 Y[il►1i A. PC2022 -015 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Harral Subdivision, an approximately 26 acre tract of land located at the southwest corner of FM 482 and Hubertus Road, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. B. WA2022 -001 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver request in relation to on -site sewage facilities for the replat of Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land generally located 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Guadalupe County, Texas. C. WA2022 -002 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver regarding Rough Proportionality in relation to the construction of the street improvements adjacent to the proposed replat of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land generally located 1,200 feet southwest from the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, Guadalupe County. D. PC2022 -014 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land Located approximately 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, located in the Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Guadalupe County, Texas. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda B. Announcements by Commissioners • City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended Planning & Zoning March 23, 2022 Page 2 of 3 C. Announcements by City Staff. • City and community events attended and to be attended. INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR A. Current Projects and City Council Status Update ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING CERTIFICATION I, Megan Harrison, Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 18th day of March, 2022 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code. Megan Harrison Megan Harrison, Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on day of 2022. title: This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619 -1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City's legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. Planning & Zoning March 23, 2022 Page 3 of 3 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: ZC2022 -006 SUBJECT: ZC2022 -006 Hold a public hearing, discussion and possible action to approve a recommendation to the City Council regarding an amendment of land use assumptions and a capital improvements plan and imposition of an impact fee. GENERAL INFORMATION: City staff isproposing to update the City's roadway impact fee to account for newly annexed property. This includes land that had been in the City's Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) and was recently annexed at the request of property owners who are anticipating developing the property as well as the property that was released by the City of San Antonio to the northwest of Lookout Road and Doerr Lane that was recently annexed. The goal is to include these properties in the City's roadway impact fee service areas and to designate the thoroughfares in these areas as system roadways. As part of the required process the City had to update its land use assumptions and capital improvements plan. This also results in new maximum assessable fees in each service area, but the city is not proposing to change the actual impact fee per service unit that is currently being charged - $1,000.00 per service unit for residential and $175.00 per service unit for non - residential. APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: The resolution starting this process, Resolution 22 -R -24, was approved by City Council on February 22, 2022. PUBLIC NOTICE: Resolution 22 -R -24 provides notice that the roadway impact fees will be updated. Materials were posted to the City's website on February 28, 2022. The legal notice for Council consideration on April 5, 2022 was published on March 2, 2022. ITEM SUMMARY: The update was prompted by the need to add areas to the City's roadway impact fee service areas which will also add sections of roads as system roadway. The update also factors in the City's participation in the cost of constructing Cibolo Valley Drive from Old Wiederstein to IH -35. As part of the process, the City's consultant had to update the land use assumptions and capital improvements plan, which essentially estimates the cost of constructing these roads to provide additional capacity that will be needed based on new development and divides that cost among new development in the form of the maximum fee per service unit. The areas where the changes are occurring are the land released by the City of San Antonio from their ETJ, generally to the northwest of Lookout Road and Doerr Lane. This also adds the extension of Tejas Way to the roadway CIP. The second area is in the area of Parklands 2 and adds a section of Big John Lane to the roadway CIP. The third area is around Lower Seguin Road to account for the annexation of the Saddlebrook and Carmel Ranch developments and adds sections of Raf Burnett, Lower Seguin Road, a north /south collector and the north /south collector that is the FM 3009 extension. It also includes the actual City Participation cost for Cibolo Valley Drive. While the report results in a new maximum assessable fee per service unit for each service area which is slightly lower in three of the service areas and slightly higher in the other one, these amounts are still above the amounts the City charges. Staff is not proposing a change to the fee amount charged. LAND USES AND ZONING: N/A PROPOSED ZONING: NIA CONFORMANCE WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: N/A STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the CIAO recommend approval of the proposed update to the City Council. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The CIAC is to advice the City Council on fees imposed by a political subdivision against new development in order to generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development. Attachments Roadway Impact Fee Program Amendment TECHNICAL A tJ Roadway ' Program Amendment February 25, 2022 TECHNICAL A tJ Roadway ' Program Amendment FREESE E NICHOLS, INC. TEkAS REGISTERED ENGINEERING Table of Contents Methodology —1 Service Areas 2 Land Use Assumptions 2 Projected Vehicle-Miles of New Deman 4 Capital Improvements Plan 5 Eligible Projects 5 Eligible Costs 5 Capital Improvements Plan 6 Projected Vehicle-Miles Capacity Available for New Growth 9 Cost of Roadway Improvements 10 Calculation of Impact Fees 11 Cost Attributable to New Development 11 Credit Analysis 12 Cost per Service Unit 12 Appendices _15 Appendix A: Roadway Improvement Plan Projects 16 Appendix B: Roadway improvement Plan Cost Analysis 20 Appendix C: Roadway Service Area Analysis Summary 24 In response to annexations which occurred in 2021, the City of Schertz authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis update on the City's roadway systems to incorporate revised city limit boundaries from recent annexations and programmed capital improvements consistent with the Master Thoroughfare Plan in these areas. This analysis of roadways systems serves as an interim update to the initial Impact Fee program adopted March 27, 2018 (Ordinance 18- M -13). The purpose of this technical memorandum is to update the service areas and capital improvements, as necessary, for the update of the unit cost to provide service (cost per roadway vehicle - mile). It was determined that there would be no change in Land Use Assumptions after a review of city growth rates and consultation with City Staff. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 and is consistent with the methodological approach of the initial program in 2018. Annexations occurred in Service Areas 1, 2 and 3. There were no changes made within Service Area 4. The analyses will focus on these service areas with documentation of all service areas located in the Appendices. As part of the impact fee update, FNI conducted meetings with the city's Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC), City Staff, and the City Council. The CIAC's role included review and comment to (no change in) land use assumptions, Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plans (IFCIP), and comments to the City Council. A .•-• • 1 To update the roadway impact fee program, a series of work tasks were undertaken and are described below. 1. Meetings were held with the City of Schertz Staff to review the annexations, changes in the impact fee CIP, and the methodology to be used in the update. 2. Roadway service area structure was updated for areas affected by annexations. 3. Vehicle -miles of travel in the PM peak hour were retained as the service unit measure for roadway impact fee calculations. 4. A roadway conditions inventory was updated for newly annexed roadways to include lane geometries, roadway classifications and segment lengths, as necessary, of facilities in the impact fee program. S. Projected growth (service units) by service area over the ten -year planning period was retained using the initial Land Use Assumptions and Land Use Equivalency Table. 6. The roadway impact fee capital improvements program (IFCIP) was reviewed to incorporate additional projects in the annexed areas. 7. Roadway cost data of construction, engineering, and right -of -way for amended impact fee projects were compiled by service area. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 1 8. The cost of capacity provided, maximum cost per service unit, and cost attributable Nnew development were calculated for each service area. 9. A technical memorandum was prepared to document the procedures and findings of the SERVICE AREAS Roadway service areas define areas to be served by impact fee projects. More importantly, these geographic areas are defined to ensure that facility improvements are near new growth generating the need. Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Codes mandates that service areas for roadway programs bc limited toamaximum six miles and within city limits. Srber1z's service areas for roads were established in the City's initial impact far program and were adjusted tn incorporate the development ounozuduos within Service Areas 1, 2, and (highlighted iu the image tu the right). Figure l illustrates the amended roadway impact fee service area structure. [AND USE ASSUMPTIONS Growth defined iu terms of land use assumptions, servetodotorodootbeoeedaudtbmiugofcnnhn improvements to serve future development. This ten-year forecast examined population and employment net growth between 3017 and 2027 and was rooted in analysis of historic growth trends over the past 3, S, and ton-years and documented as part of the impact fee program implementation process. Given the recent nature of the laud use assumptions analysis, the pandemic and economic slowdown, and resurgence/continued growth, the initial ten-year forecast was deemed acceptable for this programmatic update. Hence, no changes were made to the initial ten-year assumptions. Table 1 and Table 2, summarize the forecasted population and employment growth which, in addition to the roadway impact fee capital improvement plan, will serve as basis for the cost per service unit calculation. 2021Scbmrtz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 2 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Table 1,: Initial Impact Fee Population Projectioomm Source: mnxuurtx Roadway Impact Fee Study �able 2: Initial Impact Fee Eniployment Projections Source; zm7xuurt, Roadway Impact Fee Study Projected Vehicle-Miles of New Demand Projected vehicle-miles of demand were calculated based on this net population and employment growth forecasted to occur over the 10-yeur planning period and the oendoe unit generation for each of the population and employment data components. These values were retained from the 3U17 Impact Fee Study, us summarized iu Table 3. 2021Schariz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 4 Table Sa I ra1rac, l4er 10 -Year Projected Service Unit 1lrowtlft MW The impact fee capital improvements plan is aimed at facilitating the implementation of the ultimate thoroughfare network. Projects incorporated into the impact fee program are rooted in the city's official Thoroughfare Plan. Eligible projects Legislative mandate stipulates that the impact fee CIP contain only those roadways which are included on the City's official Thoroughfare Plan that are classified as arterial or collector status facilities. A review of the Thoroughfare Plan (updated as part of the 2016 Comprehensive Plan) identified projects which were eligible for consideration by impact fees. Impact fee legislation also allows for the recoupment of costs for previously constructed facilities. Only costs incurred by the City may be considered for impact fees. Roadways constructed with private funding cannot be included for impact fee consideration. Additionally, state facilities are eligible for inclusion to the impact fee system; however, only costs incurred by the City may be eligible for consideration. Eligible Costs In general, those costs associated with the design, right -of -way acquisition, and construction and financing of all items necessary to implement the roadway projects identified in the capital improvements plan are eligible. It is important to note that upon completion of the capital improvements identified in the CIP, the city must recalculate the impact fee using the actual costs and make refunds if the actual cost is less than the impact fee paid by greater than 10 percent. To prevent this situation, conservative estimates of project cost are considered. Only the cost necessitated by new development will be utilized for impact fee consideration. For example, if only 60% of the capacity provided by the impact fee CIP is needed over the ten -year window, then only 60% of the cost associated with those facilities is considered in the cost per service unit calculation. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 5 CapitalDmprosernents Plan Using the 017impact fee program capital improvements plan as the base for this update, several projects were added to the capital improvement projects or modified. These project additions were coordinated through City Staff and are listed below iuTable 4. Table 4: IMP Project J&dditions/Modificatioms:2021Update 1 27 wm Connector(l) /Cibolo Valley 11-135 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 Secondary Arterial Comment: Amendedproject cost of$1,3M per Development Agreement on Cibola Valley Drive, 2 wa E/W Connector mx"ias Wav WmwLimits Doerr Lane New 0.65 o v"mm°rci°o"llem°* wx m RAF - Burnett° Schaefer Rd s City Limits New 0.55 4 Secondary Arterial Comment, Annexation of Sadlebrook Addition. 3 54A Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.08 4 Secondary Arterial Comment., Annexation of Sadlebrook Addition. ma Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 0.23 4 Secondary Arterial Comment: Annexation of Sadlebrook Addition. Connector (3) S. of Schaefer/Raf Burnette Lower Seguin Rd New 0.66 4 Principal Arterial Comment: Annexation of Sadlebrook Addition. o 57a Connector (4) Lower Seguin Rd S City Limit/Carmel Ranch New 0.24 2 Residential Collector Comment: Annexation of Carmel Ranch Addition. Project cost estimates were for new additions to the program using o unit cost approach consistentwith the methodology of the initial program. Project costs for the initially identified IMP program were nocbuogod unless o project was completed, in vvbicb then actual costs were input into the database. Figure 2 and Table 5 illustrate and list the capital improvement projects and their associated total cost for the impact fee system. The full list nflFClp projects and cost for all service areas can bo found iu the Appendices. 2021ScharLz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 6 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Table 5: IMP Project Listing Sery Area Project No. Roadway From To Project Status Length (mi) No. of Type Pct. in Lanes RdwyServ. Are Total Project Cost 1 1 FM 2252 IH 35 FM 482 New 0.32 4 DA 100% $1,566,800 1 2 FM 2252 FM 482 Railroad Tracks New 0.64 4 DA 100% $3,146,000 1/X 3 FM 2252 Railroad Tracks N City Limits New 0.22 4 DA 50% $509,850 1/2 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 50% $3,202,650 1 5 E/W Connector (1) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 4 DA 100% $5,513,000 1 6 E/W Connector (2) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 2 UC 100% $4,269,000 1 7 FM 482 FM 2252 Hubertus Rd New 1.05 4 DA 100% $5,456,100 1 8 FM 482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks New 1.00 4 DA 100% $5,147,800 1 9 FM 482 800'W of Friesenhahn Friesenhahn Ln New 0.15 4 DA 100% $754,100 1/X 10 FM 482 Friesenhahn Ln Schwab Rd New 0.59 4 DA 50% $1,530,000 1 11 FM 482 Schwab Rd E City Limits New 1.20 4 DA 100% $6,205,500 1 12 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.57 4 DA 100% $2,855,700 1 13 Hubertus Rd FM 482 N City Limits New 0.30 4 DA 100% $1,572,300 1 14 Friesenhahn Ln IH 35 FM 482 New 0.72 3 Sc 100% $1,343,600 1 15 Schwab Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.63 6 DA 100% $4,374,700 1 16 ENV Connector (3) Hubertus Rd David Lack Blvd New 1.59 3 Sc 100% $6,110,000 1 17A Eckhardt Rd Froboese Ln Green Valley Rd New 1.11 2 UC 100% $3,727,100 1 18 Schwab Rd IH 35 S City Limits New 1.14 4 DA 100% $5,680,700 1 19 Froboese Ln Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.57 2 UC 100% $2,030,400 1 20 Froboese Ln 2200' E of Eckhardt E City Limits New 0.26 2 UC 100% $890,000 1 21 Green Valley Rd W City Limits E City Limits New 0.87 4 DA 100% $4,199,500 1 22 Homestead Pkwy End Ex Homestead Pkwy S City Limits New 0.33 2 UC 100% $1,178,500 1 23 Country Club Blvd Scenic Links S City Limits New 0.35 2 UC 100% $1,257,100 1 24 E/W Connector (4) Country Club Blvd Homestead Pkwy New 0.77 2 UC 100% $2,671,200 1 25A E/W Connector (4) Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.45 2 UC 100% $1,602,000 1 26 FM 1103 IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.70 4 DA 100% $2,000,000 1 27 N/S Conn. (1) /Cibolo Valley IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 DA 100% $1,300,000 1 28 N/S Connector (2) IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.73 4 DA 100% $3,635,700 1 29 E/W Connector (5) N/S Connector (1) FM 1103 New 2.00 2 UC 100% $7,097,200 1/X 30 Old Wiederstein Rd N/S Connector (1) Cherry Tree Dr New 2.17 4 DA 50% $5,143,600 Sub -total SA 1 24.22 $95,970,100 2 31 Doerr Ln N City Limits Lookout Rd New 0.91 3 Sc 100% $3,249,900 2/1 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 50% $3,130,900 2 32 E/W Connector (2) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC 100% $3,386,200 2 33 ENV Connector (6) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC 100% $3,386,100 2 34 Mid - Cities Pkwy IH 35 FM 3009 New 0.98 3 SC 100% $3,293,700 2 35 E/W Connector (1) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 4 DA 100% $4,190,900 2 36 ENV Conn. (7) /Tejas Way W City Limits Doerr Ln Recoup 0.65 3 Sc 100% $2,231,100 2 36ATejas Way Existing Tejas Way UP RR /City Limit New 0.52 3 Sc 100% $1,647,800 2 37 Lookout Rd Tri- County Pkwy Schertz Pkwy New 0.74 3 Sc 100% $2,743,600 2 38 Four Oaks Ln End of Ex .Four Oaks Ln N/S Connector (1) New 0.54 3 Sc 100% $1,977,300 2 39 Wiederstein Rd E City Limits FM 3009 New 0.64 4 DA 100% $3,079,800 2 40 Wiederstein Rd Schertz Pkwy W City Limits New 0.41 2 UC 100% $1,294,700 2 41 Baptist Health Dr Ripps - Kreusler Wiederstein Rd New 0.27 3 Sc 100% $992,900 2 42 Ripps - Kreusler Baptist Health Dr End of Ripps Kreusler New 0.22 3 Sc 100% $803,900 2 43 Masks Rd FM 1518 Oak St New 0.54 3 Sc 100% $1,827,600 2 44 Masks Rd Realignment Oak St Schertz Pkwy New 0.88 2 UC 100% $3,645,200 2 45 FM 1518 /Main St Maske Rd Oak St New 1.30 3 SA 100% $4,494,500 2 46 FM 1518 N City Limits SA 3 Limit New 0.36 6 DA 100% $436,300 2/3 47 FM 1518 SA 3 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 50% $222,650 2 48 FM 78 /John Peterson Blvd W City Limits E City Limits New 1.81 6 DA 100% $2.683,780 Sub -total SA 2 14.86 $48,718,830 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 8 Sery Area Project No. Roadway Table S contln ed)R IFCIP Project Listing Project Length From To Status (mi) No. of Type Pct, in Lanes RdwyServ. Are Total Project Cost 3/2 47 FM 1518 SA 2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 50% $222,650 3 49 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext. IH 10 New 4.09 6 DA 100% $5,165,000 3 50 Schaefer Rd W City Limits FM 1518 New 0.48 2 UC 100% $1,536,700 3/X;51 RAF - Burnette Schaefer Rd E City Limits New 0.55 4 DA 100% $2,559,000 3/X 52 Lower Seguin Rd W City Limits E of Tates Dr New 0.35 3 SA 50% $686,450 3 53 Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Dr W of Canopy Bend New 1.76 3 SA 100% $6,998,900 3 54A Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.08 4 DA 100% $4,917,900 3 54B Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 0.23 4 DA 100% $1,063,700 3 55 N/S Connector (3) S. of Schaefer /Raf Burnette Lower Seguin Rd New 0.66 4 DA 100% $3,338,500 3 56 N/S Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.27 4 DA 100% $1,380,400 3 57A N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.26 2 UC 100% $894,600 3 5713 N/S Connector (4) Lower Seguin Rd S City Limit/Carmel Ranch New 0.24 2 UC 100% $838,000 3 58 N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.21 2 UC 100% $725,000 3/X 59 W Ware Seguin Rd W City Limits Boeing or New 0.57 2 UC 50% $900,550 3 60 W Ware Seguin Rd Boeing or N/S Connector (5) New 0.67 2 UC 100% $2,236,900 3 61 N/S Connector (5) Lower Seguin Rd W Ware Seguin Rd New 1.10 2 UC 100% $3,780,500 3 62 N/S Connector (5) W Ware Seguin Rd E Ware Seguin Rd New 0.93 2 UC 100% $3,227,400 3 63 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) Weir Rd IH 10 New 1.66 4 DA 100% $8,020,500 3 64 Trainer Hale Rd (E /W) FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) New 1.51 4 DA 100% $7,710,300 3 65 Ware Seguin Rd Graytown Rd N/S Connector (5) New 1.35 3 SA 100% $4,736,300 3 66 E Ware Seguin Rd N/S Connector (5) FM 1518 New 1.41 3 SA 100% $4,739,900 3/4 67 Graytown Rd Boeing or IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 50% $2,000,600 3 68 N/S Connector (6) Ware Seguin Rd IH 10 New 0.47 3 SC 100% $1,712,600 _3 69 E/W Connector (8) IH 10 E City Limits New 2.33 3 SC 100% $8.482.300 Sub -total SA 3 23.67 $77,874,650 4/3 67 Graytown Rd Boeing or IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 50% $2,000,600 4 70 Binz - Engleman Rd W City Limits Graytown Rd New 1.30 3 SA 100% $4,667,000 _4 71 Scenic Lake Dr Binz- Enoleman Rd IH 10 New 0.77 3 SC 100% $2777400 Sub -total SA 4 3.19 $9,445,000 Totals: 65.94 1 $232,008,580 Notes: DA- Divided arterial SA- Special arterial (with two way left turn lane) SC- Special collector (with two way left turn lane) UC- Undivided collector Projected Vehicle Mims Capacity Available for New Growth The vehicle -miles of new capacity supply were calculated consistent with the initial program for capacity supplied. The equation used was: Vehicle -Miles of New Capacity = Link capacity per peak hour per lane x No. of Lanes x Length of segment (miles) Vehicle -miles of new capacity provided by the CIP are listed in Table 6. Also depicted is the net capacity provided by the CIP (removal of existing traffic consuming capacity from improvements). The Appendix contains details of the capacity calculations provided by the CIP program for all service areas. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 9 Tabl e 6. Updat ed chicle,. files of I OP ap ;i ? Provided A comparison of net capacity provided by the updated CIP relative to 10 -year demands (from land use assumptions) reveals sufficient capacity to address growth attributable to new development. Table 7 summarizes the percentage of CIP attributable to new development. `table 7� Projected Den and and Percent .Attributable to ii -Year Growth Cast of Roadway Improvements The total cost, including study update costs, and cost of net capacity supplied to implement the roadway improvements plan projects by service area are shown in Table B. If traffic exists on proposed CIP project roadways or there are any deficiencies present on the current network within each respective service area (existing utilization), the total system cost is adjusted to reflect the net capacity being made available by the impact fee program. In other words, only the excess or unused 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 10 portion of the CIP and its associated costs are considered eligible. Per state law, a credit for the portion of ad- valorem tax revenues generated by improvements over the program period, or a credit equal to 50% of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan, must be given. A detailed listing by project segment in each service area can be found in the Appendix. Table II$ Summary of IFCIP Cost and Cost of Net Capacity Provided CALCULATION OF IMPACT FEES Cost Attributable to New Development The cost attributable to new development within this cost of net capacity is calculated by comparing the projected vehicle -miles of demand to the net capacity supplied by the IFCIP. If the demand is higher than the net IFCIP capacity provided, then the full cost of the net capacity is attributable to new development. If there is more net capacity than required to meet the project demand, then the cost attributable to new development is the proportional amount of the cost of net capacity based on the ratio of projected demand to net capacity supplied by the IFCIP. For this update, all of Schertz's roadway service areas are projected to have a demand by new development that consumes only a portion of the full net capacity supplied by the IFCIP. This is shown in Table 9. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 11 Table 9: Roadway Improvements Plan Cost Attributable to New Development Credit Analysis Per Chapter 395, the cost of the Cl9must be credited for ad-valorem tax generated through new development either through a credit analysis or u Ou1 5096 credit. The City nfSobortz opted to perform the credit analysis in lieu of the 50% credit to determine the maximum allowable fee per service unit. No changes were made to the credit analysis as there were no changes in the 10-year Land Use Assumptions (and hence the rcsu|tan1VK4T growth). Table 10 lists the C{P credit and resultant ClP cost attributable tu growth (less rroditi. Table MCIP Coedit and Resultant Cost Attributable to New Development Cost per Service Unit The cost per service unit is calculated by dividing the cost of the CIP necessitated and attributable to new demand (net cost) bythe projected service units of growth overthe 10-year planning period. 2021ScharLz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 12 1 $24,892,878 7,974,490 $16,918,388 2 $37,82S,074 $13,649,OS1 $24,176,022 3 $27,204,244 $11,371,991 $lS,832,2S3 4 $391,221 $94,S2S $296,696 Total $90,313,418 $33,090,OS7 $S7,223,360 Cost per Service Unit The cost per service unit is calculated by dividing the cost of the CIP necessitated and attributable to new demand (net cost) bythe projected service units of growth overthe 10-year planning period. 2021ScharLz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 12 Table 11 lists the calculation and results of the cost per service unit calculation by service area. The actual cost per service unit reflects the true burden to the City for the implementation of the roadway capital improvements program. Based on the credit analysis, the maximum rate after credit reflects the maximum amount per service unit that can be charged to comply with state statute. The Appendix details the maximum fee per service unit calculation for each service area. Table 1-1: Cost per Service Unit Su.ni mary These updated cost per service unit rates (maximum allowable) are compared in Table 12 to the rates calculated in the 2017 Impact Fee study as well as the current collection rates set at the conclusion of that study. There are slight variations to the cost per service unit in each service area. The updated cost per service unit do not have a negative effect to existing collection rates if the same collection rate is desired to be maintained. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 13 Table 12. Cost per, Service Unit Comparlson to Initial Impact Fee Study 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 14 1 $1,647.53 $1,617.29 ($30.24) $900.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 $175.00 2 $1,327.89 $1,350.25 $2236 $900.00 $1,000-00 $100.00 $175.00 3 $1,044.48 $1,061.26 $16.78 $900.00 $1,000-00 $100.00 $175.00 4 $2,392.72 $2,386.94 ($5.78) $900.00 $1,000.00 $100.00 1 $175.00 1 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update 14 Appendices 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update APPENDIX A: ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN PROJECTS 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Definitions @N83 The total number oflanes in both directions available for travel. TYPE The type of roadway (used in determining coyucby): UC= undivided collector DC= divided collector DA= undivided arterial DA= divided arterial SC= special collector (roadway with continuous left turn) SA= special arterial (roadway with continuous left turn) 0VV= one-way roadway 9K'H0V0LDME The existingvolumes of cars on the roadway segment traveling duringthe afternoon (P.M.) peak hour of travel. 96 IN SERVICE AREA If the roadway is located on the boundary of the service area (with the city limits running along the centerline of the roadway), then half of the roadway is inventoried in the service area and the other half is not. This value is either 5 0% or 100%. VEB-Ml SUPPLY TOTAL The number o[ total service units (vobkde+nUps ) supplied within the service area, based on the length, and established capacity nf the roadway type. VE8'MTTOTAL The total service unit (vehide*ile) demand created by existing traffic on the DBMANDPB-Kk roadway segment in the afternoon peak hour. EXCESS CAPACITY The number of service units supplied but unused by existing traffic inthe PK-8R VED-K4[ afternoon peak hour. 2021Scheriz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update N O N N n s' fD I N O Sv C� G P1 rt `r] M (D rn r+ rtC A.1 CD Sery Project Project Length No. of Type Pct. in Peak Hour Volume* VMT SupplyVMT Demand Excess CIP VMT- - Area No. Roadway From To Status (mi) Lanes RdwyServ. Area A B Total Pk Hr Total Pk Hr Total VMTCapacit Deficiency 1 1 FM 2252 IH 35 FM 482 New 0.32 4 DA l00% 73 250 323 853 102 751 0 1 2 FM 2252 FM 482 Railroad Tracks New 0.64 4 DA 100% 73 250 323 1726 206 1519 0 1/X 3 FM 2252 Railroad Tracks N City Limits New 0.22 4 DA 50% 0 250 250 299 55 244 0 1/2 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 50% 0 0 0 1691 0 1691 0 1 5 E/W Connector (1) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 2668 0 2668 0 1 6 EM/ Connector (2) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 988 0 988 0 1 7 FM 482 FM 2252 Hubertus Rd New 1.05 4 DA t00% 46 52 98 2841 -103 2738 0:: 1 8 FM 482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks New 1.00 4 DA t00% 46 52 98 2705 98 2607 o- 1 9 FM 482 800'W of Friesenhahn Friesenhahn Ln New 0.15 4 DA t00% 46 52 98 405 '15 390 0 1/X 10 FM 482 Friesenhahn Ln Schwab Rd New 0.59 4 DA 50% 46 0 46 797 27 769 0 1 11 FM 482 Schwab Rd E City Limits New 1.20 4 DA 100% 46 52 98 3240 118 3122 0 1 12 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.57 4 DA 100% 30 57 87 1529 49 1480 0 1 13 Hubertus Rd FM 482 N City Limits New 0.30 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 821 0 821 0 1 14 Friesenhahn Ln IH 35 FM 482 New 0.72 3 SC 100% 50 50 100 789 72 717 0 1 15 Schwab Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.63 6 DA 100% 120 315 435 2548 274 2274 0 1 16 E/W Connector (3) Hubertus Rd David Lack Blvd New 1.59 3 SC 100% 0 0 0 1754 0 1754 0< 1 17A Eckhardt Rd Froboese Ln Green Valley Rd New 1.11 2 UC 100% 19 11 30 1110 33 1077 0 1 18 Schwab Rd IH 35 S City Limits New 1.14 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 3078 0 3078 0 1 19 Froboese Ln Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.57 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 573 0 573 0 1 20 Froboese Ln 2200'E of Eckhardt E City Limits New 0.26 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 260 0 260 0 1 21 Green Valley Rd W City Limits E City Limits New 0.87 4 DA 100% 10 10 20 2352 17 2335 0 1 22 Homestead Pkwy End Ex Homestead Pkwy S City Limits New 033 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 326 0 326 0 1 23 Country Club Blvd Scenic Links S City Limits New 035 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 350 0 350 0 1 24 EM/ Connector (4) Country Club Blvd Homestead Pkwy New 0.77 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 770 0 770 0 1 25A E/W Connector (4) Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.45 2 UC 100% 10 10 20 451 9 442 0 1 26 FM 1103 IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.70 4 DA 100% 590 1020 1610 1894 1129 764 0' 1 27 N/S Conn.(1) /Cibolo Valley IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 DA l00% 50 50 100 1485 55 1430 0 1 28 N/S Connector (2) IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.73 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 1983 0 1983 0 1 29 E/W Connector (5) N/S Connector (1) FM 1103 New 2.00 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 1998 0 1998 0 1/X 30 Old Wiederstein Rd N/S Connector (1) Cherry Tree Dr New 2.17 4 DA 50% 0 177 177 2930 384 2545 0 Sub -total SA 1 24.22 45213 2747 42466 0' 2 31 Doerr Ln N City Limits Lookout Rd New 0.91 3 SC 100% 50 50 100 1004 91 913 0 2/1 4 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 50% 0 0 0 1691 0 1691 0 2 32 EM/ Connector (2) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 810 0 810 0 2 33 E/W Connector (6) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 810 0 810 0 2 34 Mid - Cities Pkwy IH 35 FM 3009 New 0.98 3 SC t00% 0 0 0 1082 0 1082 0 2 35 EM/ Connector (1) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 4 DA t00% 0 0 0 2200 0 2200 0> 2 36 E/W Conn. (7) /Tejas Way W City Limits Doerr Ln Recoup 0.65 3 SC t00% 0 0 0 717 0 717 0 2 36A Tejas Way Existing Tejas Way UP RR /City Limit New 0.52 3 SC t00% 0 0 0 574 0 574 0 2 37 Lookout Rd Tri- County Pkwy Schertz Pkwy New 074 3 SC t00% 133 219 352 815 261 554 0` 2 38 Four Oaks Ln End of Ex .Four Oaks Ln N/S Connector (1) New 0.54 3 SC 100% 0 0 0 598 0 598 0 2 39 Wiederstein Rd E City Limits FM 3009 New 0.64 4 DA t00% 0 0 0 1737 0 1737 0 2 40 Wiederstein Rd Schertz Pkwy W City Limits New 0.41 2 UC t00% 100 100 200 406 81 -.325 0: Sam Project Project Length No. of Type Pct. in Peak Hour Volume* .VMT SupplyVMT Demand Excess CIP VMT - Area No. Roadway From To Status (mi) Lanes RdwyServ.Area A B Total Pk Hr Total Pk Hr Total VMT Capacit Deficiency 2 41 Baptist Health Dr Ripps - Kreusler Wiederstein Rd New 0.27 3 SC 100% 0 0 0 302 0 302 0; 2 42 Ripps - Kreusler Baptist Health Or End of Ripps Kreusler New 0.22 3 SC 100% 0 0 0 245 - 0 245 0" 2 43 Maske Rd FM 1518 Oak St New 0.54 3 SC t00% 97 105 202 595 109 486 >0 2 44 Maske Rd Realignment Oak St Schertz Pkwy New 0.88 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 875 0 875 0 2 45 FM 1518 /Main St Maske Rd Oak St New 1.30 3 SA l00% 397 351 748 1753 971 782 :. 0' 2 46 FM 1518 N City Limits SA 3 Limit New 0.36 6 DA 100% 755 508 1263 1465 457 1008 0' 2/3 47 FM 1518 SA 3 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 50% 755 0 755 793 296 497 0 2 48 FM 78 /John Peterson Blvd W City Limits E City Limits New 1.81 6 DA 100% 1525 1096 2621 7311 4732 2580 0 Sub -total SA 2 14.86 25783 6998 18785 '. 0. 3/2 47 FM 1518 SA 2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 50% 0 508 508 793 199 594 0 3 49 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext. IH 10 New 4.09 6 DA 100% 755 508 1263. 16565 5166 11399 -. 0' 3 50 Schaefer Rd W City Limits FM 1518 New 0.48 2 UC 100% 100 100 200 478 96 : 383 0: 3/X 5, RAF - Burnette Schaefer Rd E City Limits New 0.55 4 DA 100% 50 50 100 1472 55 1417 0- 3/X 52 Lower Seguin Rd W City Limits E of Tates Dr New 0.35 3 SA 50% 304 0 304 237 107 130 0 3 53 Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Dr W of Canopy Bend New 1.76 3 SA 100% 304 188 492 2376 866 1510 0- 3 54A Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.08 4 DA 100% 37 16 53 2903 -57 2846 0 3 54B Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 0.23 4 DA 100% 37 16 53 626 12 614 0- 3 55 N/S Connector (3) S. of Schaefer /Raf Burnette Lower Seguin Rd New 0.66 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 1776 0 1776 0 3 56 N/S Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.27 4 DA 100% 0 0 0 716 0 716 0 3 57A N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.26 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 256 0 256 '. 0 3 571 N/S Connector (4) Lower Seguin Rd S City Limit/Carmel Ranch New 0.24 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 243 0 243 0 3 58 N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.21 2 UC 100% 0 0 0 211 0 211 0 3/X 59 W Ware Seguin Rd W City Limits Boeing Dr New 0.57 2 UC 50% 0 20 20 283 11 272 0 3 60 W Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Or N/S Connector (5) New 0.67 2 UC 100% 19 20 39 669 26 642 0 3 61 N/S Connector (5) Lower Seguin Rd W Ware Seguin Rd New 1.10 2 UC 100% 20 19 39 1104 43 1061 0` 3 62 N/S Connector (5) W Ware Seguin Rd E Ware Seguin Rd New 0.93 2 UC 100% 20 19 39 932 36 895 0 3 63 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) Weir Rd IH 10 New 1.66 4 DA 100% 50 50 100 4480 166 4314 0 3 64 Trainer Hale Rd (ENV) FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) New 1.51 4 DA l00% 50 50 100 4070 151 3920 0 3 65 Ware Seguin Rd Graytown Rd N/S Connector (5) New 1.35 3 SA 100% 0 0 0 1828 0 1828 0 3 66 E Ware Seguin Rd N/S Connector (5) FM 1518 New 1.41 3 SA t00% 20 19 39 1910 55 3855 0= 3/4 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Or IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 50% 238 0 238 752 265 487 0 3 68 N/S Connector (6) Ware Seguin Rd IH 10 New 0.47 3 SC t00% 0 0 0 512 o 512 0 3 69 ENV Connector (8) IH 10 E City Limits New 2.33 3 SC 100% 0 0 0 2563 0 2563 0 Sub -total SA 3 23.67 47756 7311 '40446 0. 4/3 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 50% 0 89 89 752 99 653 0 4 70 Binz - Engleman Rd W City Limits Graytown Rd New 1.30 3 SA 100% 0 0 0 1760 0 1760 0 4 71 Scenic Lake Dr Binz - Engleman Rd IH 10 New 0.77 3 SC 100% 20 20 40 847 31 816 0< Sub -total SA 4 3.19 3359 - 130 <3229 0 Totals: 65.94 122,112 17,186 104,925 0 APPENDIX B: ROADWAY IMPROVEMENT PLAN COST ANALYSIS 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update Definitions LANES The total number of lanes in both directions available for travel. TYPE The type of roadway (used in determining capacity): UC = undivided collector DC = divided collector UA = undivided arterial DA = divided arterial SC = special collector (roadway with continuous left turn) SA = special arterial (roadway with continuous left turn) OW = one -way roadway % IN SERVICE AREA If the roadway is located on the boundary of the service area (with the city limits running along the centerline of the roadway), then half of the roadway is inventoried in the service area and the other half is not. This value is either 50% or 100 %. TOTAL SEGMENT COST The estimated cost (in dollars) of the entire segment of the proposed improvement. TOTAL COST IN SERVICE AREA The estimated cost (in dollars) of the portion of the proposed roadway improvement within the service area. 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update So- Project Area No. 1 1 1 2 1/X 3 1/2 4 1 5 1 6 1 7 1 8 1 9 1/X 10 1 11 1 12 1 13 1 14 1 15 1 16 1 17A 1 18 1 19 1 20 1 21 1 22 1 23 1 24 1 25A 1 26 1 27 1 28 1 29 1/X 30 Sub -totat SA t 2 31 2/1 4 2 32 2 33 2 34 2 35 2 36 2 364 2 37 2 38 2 39 2 40 2 41 2 42 2 43 2 44 2 45 Roadway From To Project Status Length (mi) No. of Type Pct. in Lanes RdwyServ. Are Roadway Project Costs Total Project Cost Prorated Study Update Cost Service Area Total Cost (10091). Engineering ROW Construction FM 2252 IH 35 FM 482 New 0.32 4 DA 100% $100,000 $38,000 $1,428,800 $1,566,800 $699 $1,567,499 FM 2252 FM 482 Railroad Tracks New 0.64 4 DA l00% $205,800 $o $2,944200 $3,146,000 $1,413 $3147,413 FM 2252 Railroad Tracks N City Limits New 0.22 4 DA 5o% $33,350 $o $476,500 $509,850 5245 $510,095 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 5o% $194,950 $222,750 $2,784,950 $3,202,650 $1,385 $3,204,035 E/W Connector (1) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 4 DA 100% $337,600 $352,800 $4,822,600 $5,513,000 $2,185 $5,515,185 E/W Connector (2) N/S Connector (1) FM 2252 New 0.99 2 UC 100% $261,300 $274,400 $3,733,300 $4,269,000 $809 $4,269,809 FM 482 FM 2252 Hubertus Rd New 1.05 4 DA l00% $343,300 $207,900 $4,904,900 $5,456,100 $2,326 $5458,426 FM 482 Hubertus Rd Railroad Tracks New 1.00 4 DA l00% $323,800 $198,000 $4,626,000 $5,147,800 $2,215 $5150,015 FM 482 800'W of Friesenhahn Friesenhahn Ln New 0.15 4 DA l00% $47,400 $30,000 $676,700 $754,100 $332 $754,432 FM 482 Friesenhahn Ln Schwab Rd New 0.59 4 DA 5o% $96,250 $58,400 $1,375,350 $1,530,000 $652 $1,530,652 FM 482 Schwab Rd E City Limits New 1.20 4 DA l00% $390,400 $237,600 $5,577,500 $6,205,500 $2,653 $6,208,153 Hubertus Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.57 4 DA l00% $178,000 $135,400 $2,542,300 $2,855,700 $1,252 $2,856,952 Hubertus Rd FM 482 N City Limits New 0.30 4 DA l00% $93,500 $142,600 $1,336,200 $1,572,300 $672 $1,572,972 Friesenhahn Ln IH 35 FM 482 New 0.72 3 SC 100% $85,400 $38,000 $1,220,200 $1,343,600 $646 $1,344,246 Schwab Rd IH 35 FM 482 New 0.63 6 DA l00% $268,200 $274,400 $3,832,100 $4,374,700 $2,087 $4376,787 E/W Connector (3) Hubertus Rd David Lack Blvd New 1.59 3 SC 100% $374900 $444700 $5,298,400 $6,114000 $1,437 $6111,437. Eckhardt Rd Froboese Ln Green Valley Rd New 1.11 2 UC 100% $238,100 $87,900 $3,401100 $3,727,100 $909 $3,728,009 Schwab Rd IH 35 S City Limits New 1.14 4 DA l00% $345,100 $406,300 $4,929,300 $5,680,700 $2,521 $5,683,221 Froboese Ln Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.57 2 UC 100% $122,500 $158,000 $1,749,900 $2,030,400 $469 $2,030,869 Froboese Ln 2200'E of Eckhardt E City Limits New 0.26 2 UC l00% $56,200 $31,100 $802,700 $890,000 $213 $890,213. Green Valley Rd W City Limits E City Limits New 0.87 4 DA 1o0% $263,500 $172,300 $3,763,700 $4,199,500 $1,926 $4,201,426 Homestead Pkwy End Ex Homestead Pkwy S City Limits New 0.33 2 UC 100% $71,100 $91,500 $1,015,900 $1,178,500 $267 $1,178,767 Country Club Blvd Scenic Links S City Limits New 0.35 2 UC 100% $75,900 $97,000 $1,084,200 $1,257,100 $287 $1,257,387 E/W Connector (4) Country Club Blvd Homestead Pkwy New 0.77 2 UC 100% $164800 $211800 $2,296,600 $2,671,200 $631 $2,671,831 E/W Connector (4) Schwab Rd Eckhardt Rd New 0.45 2 UC 100% $96,600 $124,700 $1,384700 $1,602000 $370 $1,602,370 FM 1103 IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.70 4 DA l00% $0 $o $2,000,000 $2,000,000 $1,551 $2,001,551 N/S Conn. (1) /Cibolo Valley IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.55 4 DA l00% $0 $o $1,300,000 $1,300,000 $1,216 $1,301,216 N/S Connector (2) IH 35 Old Wiederstein Rd New 0.73 4 DA l00% $220,800 $260,200 $3,154,700 $3,635,700 $1,624 $3637,324 E/W Connector (5) N/S Connector (1) FM 1103 New 2.00 2 UC l00% $428,100 $554,000 $6,115,100 $7,097,200 $1,637 $7098,837 Old Wiederstein Rd N/S Connector (1) Cherry Tree Dr New 2.17 4 DA 5o% $328,050 $128,900 $4.686.650 $5,143,600 $2,399 $5,145,999 24.22 $5,736,900 $4,976,650 $85,256,550 $95,970,100 $37,026 $96,007,126 Doerr Ln N City Limits Lookout Rd New 0.91 3 SC l00% $212,600 $o $3,037,300 $3,249,900 $822 $3,250,722 N/S Connector (1) IH 35 Railroad Tracks New 1.25 4 DA 50% $190,250 $222,750 $2717,900 $3,134900 $1,385 $3,132,285 EIW Connector (2) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC l00% $206,800 $224,500 $2954,900 $3,386,200 $663 $3,386,863 E/W Connector (6) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 2 UC 100% $206,800 $224,500 $2,954,800 $3,386,100 $663 $3,386,763 Mid - Cities Pkwy IH 35 FM 3009 New 0.98 3 SC l00% $215,500 $o $3,078,200 $3,293,700 $886 $3294,586 E/W Connector (1) FM 3009 N/S Connector (1) New 0.81 4 DA 100% $255,300 $288,700 $3,646,900 $4,190,900 $1,802 $4,192,702 E/W Conn. (7)/Tejas Way W City Limits Doerr Ln Recoup 0.65 3 SC l00% $134,200 $180,200 $1,916,700 $2,231,100 $587 $2,231,687 Tejas Way Existing Tejas Way UP RR/City Limit New 0.52 3 SC l00% $99,100 $133,000 $1,415,700 $1,647,800 $470 $1,648,270 Lookout Rd Tri- County Pkwy Schertz Pkwy New 0.74 3 SC 100% $179,500 $o $2,564,100 $2743,600 $668 $2,744,268 Four Oaks Ln End of Ex .Four Oaks Ln N/S Connector (1) New 0.54 3 SC 100% $119,600 $149,700 $1,708,000 $1,977,300 $490 $1,977,790 Wiederstein Rd E City Limits FM 3009 New 0.64 4 DA l00% $186,600 $228,100 $2,665,100 $3,079,800 $1,422 $3,081,222 Wiederstein Rd Schertz Pkwy W City Limits New 0.41 2 UC 100% $84,700 $0 $1,210,000 $1,294,700 $332 $1,295,032 Baptist Health Dr Ripps - Kreusler Wiederstein Rd New 0.27 3 SC 100% $64100 $74,800 $858,000 $992,900 $247 $993,147. Ripps - Kreusler Baptist Health Dr End of Ripps Kreusler New 0.22 3 SC l00% $48,600 $61,000 $694,300 $803,900 $201 $804,101 Maske Rd FM 1518 Oak St New 0.54 3 SC l00% $119,600 $0 $1,708,000 $1,827,600 $487 $1,828,087 Maske Rd Realignment Oak St Schertz Pkwy New 0.88 2 UC 100% $222,500 $243,900 $3,178,800 $3,645,200 $717 $3645,917 FM 1518 /Main St Maske Rd Oak St New 1.30 3 SA l00% $294,000 $0 $4,200,500 $4,494,500 $1,436 $4,495,936 Sery Area Project No, Roadway From To Project Status Length (mi) No. of Type Pct. in Lanes RdwyServ. Are 2 46 FM 1518 N City Limits SA 3 Limit New 0.36 6 DA 100% 2/3 47 FM 1518 SA 3 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 5o % 2 48 FM 78 /John Peterson Blvd W City Limits E City Limits New 1.81 6 DA l00% Sub -total SA 2 $162,000 $4,675,700 $5,165,000 $13,565 14.86 $99,300 $19,000 $1,418,400 3/2 47 FM 1518 SA 2 Limit Schertz Pkwy Ext. New 0.39 6 DA 5o% 3 49 FM 1518 Schertz Pkwy Ext. IH 10 New 4.09 6 DA 100% 3 50 Schaefer Rd W City Limits FM 1518 New 0.48 2 UC 100% $1,063,700 3/X 51 RAF - Burnette Schaefer Rd E City Limits New 0.55 4 DA l00% 3/X 52 Lower Seguin Rd W City Limits E of Tates Dr New 0.35 3 SA 5o% 3 53 Lower Seguin Rd E of Tates Dr W of Canopy Bend New 1.76 3 SA l00% 3 54A Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 1.08 4 DA l00% 3 ! 54B ! Lower Seguin Rd W of Canopy Bend E City Limits New 0.23 4 DA 10o% 3 55 N/S Connector (3) S. of Schaefer /Raf Bumette Lower Seguin Rd New 0.66 4 DA l00% 3 56 N/S Connector (3) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.27 4 DA 1o0% 3 57A N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.26 2 UC 100% 3 578 N/S Connector (4) Lower Seguin Rd S City Limit/Carmel Ranch New 0.24 2 UC 100% 3 58 N/S Connector (4) N City Limits S City Limits New 0.21 2 UC 100% 3/X 59 W Ware Seguin Rd W City Limits Boeing Dr New 0.57 2 UC 50% 3 60 W Ware Seguin Rd Boeing Dr N/S Connector (5) New 0.67 2 UC 100% 3 61 N/S Connector (5) Lower Seguin Rd W Ware Seguin Rd New 1.10 2 UC 100% 3 62 N/S Connector (5) W Ware Seguin Rd E Ware Seguin Rd New 0.93 2 UC 100% 3 63 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) Weir Rd IH 10 New 1.66 4 DA l00% 3 64 Trainer Hale Rd (E /W) FM 1518 Trainer Hale Rd (N /S) New 1.51 4 DA l00% 3 65 Ware Seguin Rd Graytown Rd N/S Connector (5) New 1.35 3 SA l00% 3 66 E Ware Seguin Rd N/S Connector (5) FM 1518 New 1.41 3 SA l00% 3/4 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 5o% 3 68 N/S Connector (6) Ware Seguin Rd IH 10 New 0.47 3 SC 100% 3 69 E/W Connector (8) IH 10 E City Limits New 233 3 SC 100% Sub -total SA 3 23.67 4/3 67 Graytown Rd Boeing Dr IH 10 New 1.11 3 SA 5o% 4 70 Binz - Engleman Rd W City Limits Graytown Rd New 130 3 SA 100% 4 71 Scenic Lake Dr Binz - Engleman Rd IH 10 New 0,77 3 SC 100% Sub -total SA 4 3.19 Totals: 65.94 Roadway Project Costs Total Project Cost Prorated Study Update Cost Service Area Total Cost (100%) Engineering ROW Construction $27,400 $17,100 $391,800 $436,300 $1200 $437,500 $13,950 $9,250 $199,450 $224650 $650 $223,300 5175.600 SO $2 508 180 $Z683.780 780 $5987 $2.689,767 $3,052,700 $2,057,500 $43,608,630 $48,718,830 $21,115 $48,739,945 $13,950 $9,250 $19 9450 $224650 $650 $223,300 $327,300 $162,000 $4,675,700 $5,165,000 $13,565 $5,178,565 $99,300 $19,000 $1,418,400 $1,536,700 $392 $1,537,092 $160,300 $108,900 $2,289,800 $2,559,000 $1205 $2,560,205 $44,450 $6,950 $635,050 $686,450 $194 $686,644. $453,300 $69,700 $6,475,900 $6,998,900 $1946 $7,000,846 $313,400 $127,700 $4,476,800 $4,917,900 $2377 $4,920,277. $67,800 $27,600 $968,300 $1,063,700 $513 $1,064.213 $198,000 $312,600 $2,827,900 $3,338,500 $1454 $3,339,954 $81,900 $128,300 $1,170,200 $1,380,400 $587 $1,380,987 $53,800 $72,100 $768,700 $894,600 $210 $894,810. $50,400 $67,500 $720,100 $838,000 $199 $838,199 $43,600 $58,200 $623,200 $725,000 $173 $725,173 $58,900 $0 $841,650 $900,550 $232 $900,782 $146,300 $0 $2,090,600 $2,236,900 $547 $2,237,447 $227,400 $304,900 $3,248,200 $3,780,500 $904 $1781,404 $208,700 $36,800 $2,981,900 $3,227,400 $763 $3228,163 $498,900 $394,400 $7,127,200 $8,020,500 $3668 $8,024,168 $500,500 $59,800 $7,150,000 $7,710,300 $3333 $7,713,633 $278,400 $481,100 $3, 976,800 $4,736,300 $1497 $4,737,797 $299,100 $167,500 $4,273,300 $4,739,900 $1564 $4,741,464 $126,550 $65,950 $1,808,100 $2,000,600 $616 $2,001,216 $103,500 $130,300 $1,478,800 $1,712,600 $419 $1,713,019 512.700 $645,900 $7,323,700 $8,482,300 $2,099 $8.484.399 $4,868,450 $3,456,450 $69,549,750 $77,874,650 $39,109 $77,913,759 $126,550 $65,950 $1,808,100 $2,000,600 $616 $2,001;216 $275,000 $463,300 $3,928,700 $4,667,000 $1441 $4,668,441 177700 $61,000 $2,538,700 $2.777.400 694 $2,778:094 $579,250 $590,250 $8,275,500 $9,445,000 $2,751 r $9,447,751 $14,237,300 $11,080,850 $206,690,430 $232,008,580 $100,000 $232,108,580 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Study Update N O N N I) P1 CD I N O C� G P1 rt CD CD r-h C w C CD 2021 Schertz Roadway Impact Fee Update* Service Area Analysis Summary 1. TOTAL VEH -MI OF CAPACITY SUPPLIED BY CIP(TVMCAP) 2. TOTALVEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND(VMEXT) 3. TOTALVEH -MI OF EXISTING DEFICENCIES(VMDEF) 4, NET AMOUNT OF ROADWAY CAPACITY SUPPLIED (NVMCAP) _ NVMCAP = TVMCAP - VMEXT -VMDEF 5, TOTAL COST OF CIP WITHIN STUDY AREA(TVMCOST) 6. COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (NCVMCAP) _ NCVMCAP = (NVMCAP /TVMCAP) *TVMCOST 7. COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE(EXCOST) _ EXCOST =TVMCOST - NCVMCAP 8. TOTAL VEH -MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TENYEARS (TNEWDEM) 9. PERCENT OF CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT (NPCNT) _ IF TNEW DEM > NVMCAP, NPCNT = 100 IF TNEWDEM < NVMCAP, NPCNT = (TNEWDEM / NVMCAP)*100 10. DEBT SERVICE ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT ( DSDEM) 11. COST OF CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT (NCVMDEM) _ NCVMDEM = (TNEWDEM /NVMCAP) *NCVMCAP+ DSDEM 12 CIP CREDIT PER CREDITANALYSIS(CCRED) 13, COST PER SERVICE UNIT= (MAX FEE) MAX FEE = (NCVMDEM- CCRED)I TNEWDEM 14- BASE COSTPER SERVICE UNIT(BASE FEE) BASE FEE = NCVMDEM I TNEWDEM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Capacity Existing Existing Net Capacity Total Cost of Cost to Meet Projected Pcnt. of CIP Debt Service Cost CIP Credit Service Supplied by CIP Utilization Deficiencies Supplied by CIP Project Cost Net Capacity Existing 'li Growth Attributable to Attributable Attributable per Credit Maximum Credited Full Cost per Area (veh -mi) (veh -mi) (veh -mi) (veh -mi) of CIP Supplied Utilization (veh - miles) New Dev. 00 -yr) to New Dev. to New Dev. Analysis Cosier Service Unit Service unit fveh -miZ± 1 45,213 2,747 0 42,466 $96,007,126 $90,173,020 $5,834,106 10,461 24.6 $2,679,760 $24,892,878 $7,974,490 '$1,617.29 $2,409.84 2 25,783 6,998 d 1.8.785 $4 &.739,945 $35,510,937 $13,229,008 17,905 95 3 $3,975,291 $37,825,0 ?4 $13.649.(151 $1,350.29 $2,090.20 3 47,756 7,311 0 40446 $77913,759 $65,986633 $11,927,126 14918 369 $2,865171 $27,204244 $11.371,991 .$1,061.26 $180678 4 3,359'.. 130 0 3,229 .:$9,447751 $9,082,030 $365,721 124 3.8 $41.,588 - $391,221 $94,525 ,,$2,388.94 $3,155.02 580„ 752, 619.. 355 961 31...._, $9,564 810 $90 313 418 $33 090,057 $2,07287 Totals.. 122,1,12 ( 17,1,86 0 �,,,,, 104 925 43 408 414 $1,318.25 .. .. ....232108 _ „_,_ ,,, - .200 .,. _ .,..... _. _ ...., ,_- .._ ..... . . ........... .. ... __ _., .. eig a varage 1. TOTAL VEH -MI OF CAPACITY SUPPLIED BY CIP(TVMCAP) 2. TOTALVEH-MI OF EXISTING DEMAND(VMEXT) 3. TOTALVEH -MI OF EXISTING DEFICENCIES(VMDEF) 4, NET AMOUNT OF ROADWAY CAPACITY SUPPLIED (NVMCAP) _ NVMCAP = TVMCAP - VMEXT -VMDEF 5, TOTAL COST OF CIP WITHIN STUDY AREA(TVMCOST) 6. COST OF NET CAPACITY SUPPLIED (NCVMCAP) _ NCVMCAP = (NVMCAP /TVMCAP) *TVMCOST 7. COST TO MEET EXISTING NEEDS AND USAGE(EXCOST) _ EXCOST =TVMCOST - NCVMCAP 8. TOTAL VEH -MI OF NEW DEMAND OVER TENYEARS (TNEWDEM) 9. PERCENT OF CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT (NPCNT) _ IF TNEW DEM > NVMCAP, NPCNT = 100 IF TNEWDEM < NVMCAP, NPCNT = (TNEWDEM / NVMCAP)*100 10. DEBT SERVICE ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT ( DSDEM) 11. COST OF CIP ATTRIBUTABLE TO NEW DEVELOPMENT (NCVMDEM) _ NCVMDEM = (TNEWDEM /NVMCAP) *NCVMCAP+ DSDEM 12 CIP CREDIT PER CREDITANALYSIS(CCRED) 13, COST PER SERVICE UNIT= (MAX FEE) MAX FEE = (NCVMDEM- CCRED)I TNEWDEM 14- BASE COSTPER SERVICE UNIT(BASE FEE) BASE FEE = NCVMDEM I TNEWDEM • TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY: Emily Delgado, Senior Planner SUBJECT: Minutes for the March 9, 2022 Regular Meeting. Attachments Minutes for the March 9, 2022 Regular Meeting DRAFT PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES March 9, 2022 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on March 9, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Ernie Evans, Vice Chairman; Richard Braud, Commissioner; Gordon Rae, Commissioner; Jimmy Odom, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner Absent: Roderick Hector, Commissioner City Brian James, Assistant City Manager; Megan Harrison, Planner; Tiffany Danhof, Staff: Administrative Assistant CALL TO ORDER Chairman Mr. Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M. 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED No alternate was seated. 3. HEARING OF RESIDENTS Residents who choose to watch the aweting via live stream, but who would like to participate in flearing of Residents, should email their comments to the Planning DAnsion, at planoing�rra" schentz.corn by 5 :0(dr m, on Tuesday, March 8, 2022, so that the Planning Division may read the public comments into the record under the hearing of residents, In the booty of the email please include your name, your address, phone number, agenda item number if applicable or subject of discussion, and your comments. This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker's register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and /or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. There were no residents who spoke. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Minutes for the February 23, 2022, Regular Meeting. Motioned by Commissioner Jimmy Odom to approve, seconded by Commissioner Gordon Rae Vote: 6 - 0 Passed 5. PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant's request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary. A. SUP2021 -001 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.5 acres of land, more specifically described as the northwest corner of IH -35 and Cibolo Valley Drive, also known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 62840, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mrs. Harrison and the applicant provided a presentation. Mr. Outlaw opened the public hearing at 6:11 P.M. No one spoke. Mr. Outlaw closed the public hearing at 6:12 P.M. There was a discussion on: • Food preparation • Points of Access • Conceptual plan • Roadway and public improvement • Clarification on current zoning Motioned by Commissioner Jimmy Odom to recommend approval to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Gordon Rae Vote: 6 - 0 Passed Motioned by Vice Chairman Ernie Evans to retract first vote and amend the previous recommendation, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick Vote: 6 - 0 Passed Motioned by Commissioner Jimmy Odom to recommend approval with conditions to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Gordon Rae Vote: 6 - 0 Passed B. ZC2022 -003 - Hold a public hearing to consider and make a recommendation on an amendment to Article 9 - Site Design Standards, Section 21.9.9 Tree Preservation and Mitigation, to cap the maximum required tree mitigation. Mr. James provided a presentation. Mr. Outlaw opened the public hearing at 6:22 P.M. No one spoke. Mr. Outlaw closed the public hearing at 6:23 P.M. There was a discussion on: • Determining the canopy of the cluster of trees • Tree mitigation per acreage • Clarification on the Section 21.9.9 ordinance • Subcommittee discussion on small development • Waivers Motioned by Commissioner Jimmy Odom to recommended approval , seconded by Commissioner Gordon Rae Vote: 5 - 1 Passed NAY: Vice Chairman Ernie Evans 6. REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: A. Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda There were no requests by commissioners. B. Announcements by Commissioners • City and community events attended and to be attended • Continuing education events attended and to be attended There were announcements by commissioner Mr. Outlaw. C. Announcements by City Staff. • City and community events attended and to be attended. There were announcements by Mrs. Harrison. 7. INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR A. Current Projects and City Council Status Update 8. ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING Chairman Mr. Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 6:50 P.M. Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission Recording Secretary, City of Schertz TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: ZC2022 -004 SUBJECT: ZC2022 -004— Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan by designating approximately 142 acres of the Future Land Use Map as Industrial generally located 3,500 feet southwest of the intersection of Doerr Lane and Bell North Drive, Coma] County, Texas: Property ID 77739 and designating the extension of Tejas Way as a Commercial Collector A. GENERAL INFORMATION: The City is proposing to amend the Thoroughfare Plan to include the extension of Tejas Way in the area that was recently annexed after being released by the City of San Antonio from their ETJ. The amendment is occurring generally north of Lookout Road and West of Doerr Lane, west and south of the current Tejas Way. This item was set in motion by the update to the Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance and the approval of Resolution 22 -R -24. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Staff is proposing to amend the thoroughfare plan to add the extension of Tejas Way to the Thoroughfare Plan as a Commercial Collector A, 70' right -of -way. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends this amendment as it ensures adequate roadways are planned to serve the community. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, in making its recommendation, and the City Council, in considering final action on an amendment to the Comprehensive Land Plan, should consider the following criteria: 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City; 2. An amendment to the text is consistent with other policies of the Comprehensive Land Plan, taking into account the nature of any proposed map amendment associated with the text amendment; 3. An amendment to the Future Land Use Map, Master Thoroughfare Plan or any other applicable maps contained in the Comprehensive Land Plan is consistent with the policies of the Comprehensive Land Plan that apply to the map being amended, taking into account the nature of any proposed land use associated with the map amendment; 4. Any proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Land Plan; 5. Any proposed amendment addresses circumstances that have changed since the last time the plan map or text was considered, implements plan policies better than the current plan map or text corrects a mapping error or addresses a deficiency in the plan; and 6. Other criteria which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Attachments Draft Thoroughfare Plan Property Owner Notice Public Hearing Notice Map NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING March 11, 2022 Dear Property Owner, PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Wednesday, March 23, 2022, at 6:00 p.m. located at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and make recommendation on the following item: ZC2022 -004— Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Thoroughfare Plan by designating approximately 142 acres of the Future Land Use Map as Industrial generally located 3,500 feet southwest of the intersection of Doerr Lane and Bell North Drive, Comal County, Texas: Property ID 77739 and designating the extension of Tejas Way as a Commercial Collector A. The Planning and Zoning Commission would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. This form is used to calculate the percentage of landowners that support and oppose the request. You may return the reply form below prior to the first public hearing date by mail or personal delivery to mharrisonschertz.com. If you have any questions please feel free to call Megan Harrison, Planner directly at (210) 619 -1781. Sincerely, Megan Harrison Planner Reply Form I am: in favor of ❑ opposed to ❑ neutral to ❑ the request for ZC2022 -004 COMMENTS: NAME: SIGNATURE (PLEASE PRINT) STREET ADDRESS: DATE: !400 Schertz Parkway Scheft4 Texas 78 154 ik 21 M! 9A 000 schfOLCOM COMMUNITY-SERVICE- OPPORTUNITY x S TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Brian James, Assistant City Manager BY: CASE: ZC2022 -005 SUBJECT: ZC2022 -005 Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation on amendments of Part III, Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 4 subsection 21.4.5, Article 5 subsection 21.5.2 and 21.5.5, Article 8 subsection 21.8.9, Article 9 subsection 21.9. 10 and Article 10 subsection 21.10.2 and 21.10.4. GENERAL INFORMATION: Staff is proposing to make a variety of amendments to the UDC. Some of these are coming from the Subcommittee of P &Z and City Council that discussed single family residential development, others from problems the City has been experiencing on Main Street while others have been pending for some time. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS Staff is proposing to amend Section 21.4.5 Post- Decision procedures, section B. The section currently limits the ability of applicants to resubmit an application that has been denied to no sooner than six months after the date of denial. The amendment stipulates that limitation does not apply if the full board or commission that was seated was not present. This change was prompted by some recent denials at BOA where a lack of board members created a situation where a unanimous recommendation for approval was needed, This seems unfair to the applicants and as such a change was proposed. As a result of the work of the Subcommittee on residential development staff is proposing to make amendments to various sections to remove the prohibition on new zoning of R -6 and R -7 as well as to add the design criteria that was discussed. To allow R -6 and R -7 zoning to be granted, staff is proposing amendments to Section 21.5.5 Statement and Purpose of Residential Districts Sections F and G to remove the references to Ordinance No. 10 -S -29 that restricted the ability to grant them. It also amends Section 21.5.2 Zoning Districts Established, limitations on R -6 an R -7 to eliminate the references to the limitations imposed by Ordinance No. 10 -S -29. The changes add a cap of 30 acres for R -7 and 40 acres for R -6 As part of the design standards the parking section is being amended to require two parking spaces per mail box kiosk which must be covered, but these can be provided in the right -of -way as long as additional paving is provided so as not to be in the lane of traffic. Staff is amending the parkland dedication section to stipulate the requirements for private open space in residential subdivisions if a City park is not being provided. The curvilienear street requirement is being added to the public works design manual. In an effort to deal with the parking problem on Main Street that is occurring as a result of vehicles being parked on unpaved areas due to some temporary or short term issue and to deal with the excessive cars associated with auto repair uses being parked on the street, staff is proposing two related changes. The first is to allow temporary parking, of up to six months on an unpaved area. This would not push vehicles and trailers onto the street during construction on a site or in unique situations created by the pandemic, such as shortages of vehicle parts. The second change is to not allow parking associated with an auto repair and service business that is located on Main Street to occur in the street. Businesses need to appropriately size their business - property, buildings, staffing to handle the volume of business they anticipate and not rely on the public right -of -way for vehicle storage as this creates a safety issue and negatively impacts other properties. Staff is recommending amending Section 21.10.2 General Provisions to add a subsection L that stipulates that parking and storage of vehicles associated with automobile repair and services businesses on Main Street cannot occur in the street. Staff is also recommending that section 21.8.9 Outdoor Display and Storage, subsection 4 be amended to add an additional subsection D to allow staff to issue pen-nit for businesses to park vehicles on an unpaved area for up to six months. loll_ \IiWROEVX163k7 IVI77DrceldM1010 MyYrN�ii Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments as it is important to update the UDC from time to time to deal with new situations that arise and achieve the vision of the City's Comprehensive Plan. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is making a recommendation to City Council on the proposed Unified Development Code Amendments. In considering action on a UDC Amendment, the Commission should consider the following criteria within UDC, Section 21.4.7 D. 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City; 2. An amendment to the text is consistent with other policies of this UDC and the City; 3. Any proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and objectives of this UDC and the City; and 4. Other criteria which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. 1 Attachments Post Decision Procedures Statement of Purpose Res Districts Zoning Districts Established Parking Standards Park and Open Space Outdoor Display and Storage Sec. 21.4.5. Post - Decision Procedures. A. Notification Required. Within ten (10) business days following final action on any Development Application, the appropriate City department shall provide written notification to the applicant of the decision of the Board, Commission, Committee or the City Council considering the request. If an application has been denied, the notification should include the reasons for denial as well as any information relating to reapplication procedures for the appropriate application. B. Reapplication Following Denial. Whenever any Development Application, with the exception of any plat application, is denied, a Development Application for all or a part of the same property shall not be accepted for filing for a period of six (6) months after the date of denial unless the subsequent application involves a proposal that is substantially different from the previously denied proposal mar if the in ial denial was consWer d by Hess than 100% of the m embers who could have been seated. For the purpose of this section, a request may be considered substantially different if the change is to a different zoning classification, there is a change in conditions relating to zoning principles of the property or surrounding properties or there is a change in the nature of the development of the property or surrounding properties. The City Manager or his /her designee shall resolve any questions concerning the similarity of the reapplication. The final decision - maker may, at its option, waive the six (6) month waiting period if, after due consideration of the matter at a scheduled and posted meeting, it is determined that denial of the request was based upon erroneous or omitted information, or if substantial new information pertaining to the request is discovered. C. Amendments and Revisions to Approved Application. Unless otherwise expressly provided by this UDC, any request to amend or revise an approved Development Application shall be considered a new application, which must be decided in accordance with the procedures governing the original application and the standards in effect at the time such new application is filed with the City. D. Amendments Required. Whenever a subsequent Development Application differs substantially from a previously approved Development Application to which the subsequent application must conform, the applicant shall submit an amended Development Application for the initial Development Application, which shall be decided prior to the subsequent application. The applicant's failure to comply with this section shall result in denial of the subsequent application (Supp. No. 5) Page 1 of 1 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:07 [EST] Sec. 21.5.5. Statement of Purpose and Intent for Residential Districts. A. Predevelopment District (PRE). Intended for use for undeveloped land in the City or as a temporary designation for existing uses for newly annexed property. This zoning is also suitable for areas where development is premature due to lack of utilities, capacity or service and for areas that are unsuitable for development because of physical constraints or potential health or safety hazards. No improvements, construction or structures may be undertaken without obtaining a building permit and no occupancy of such improvements and structures without obtaining a certificate of occupancy. B. Single- Family Residential District (R -1). Comprised of single - family detached residential dwellings on a minimum lot size of 9,600 square feet, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. C. Single - Family Residential District (R -2). Comprised of single - family detached residential dwellings with a minimum lot size of 8,400 square feet, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. D. Two - Family Residential District (R -3). Comprised of two (2) single - family attached residential dwellings with a minimum lot size of 9,000 square feet, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. E. Apartment /Multi- Family Residential District (R -4). Intended for apartment and multi - family developments including, but not limited to apartment buildings, duplex, garden apartments, condominium units, assisted living centers, nursing homes and other similar uses. Due to the infrastructure requirements for such districts, the City may require the applicant seeking such zoning classification to establish (i) the adequacy of available access and utility facilities, (ii) sufficiency of drainage, and (iii) provision of sufficient open space. The minimum lot size in such district is 10,000 square feet for three (3) units and 1,800 square feet for each additional dwelling unit. The maximum density shall be twenty -four (24) units per acre. Apartment/Multi- Family Residential Districts should not be located in areas where they would increase traffic through single - family neighborhoods and should be located adjacent to arterial streets with sufficient capacity to carry the increased traffic generated. Multi- family developments are suitable buffers between single - family districts and commercial uses. Multi- family districts should be buffered from non - residential land uses and from pollution sources and environmental hazards. Twenty percent (20 %) of the total platted area shall be provided as common, usable open space. Single- Family Residential District (R -6). Comprised of single - family detached residential dwellings that are on a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. This district is intended to be developed using the more contemporary building styles and allowing those dwellings to be constructed on relatively small lots. j- . d+na -N 2-94 The maximum size tract that can be zoned R -6 is 30 acres. G. Single- Family Residential District (R -7). Comprised of single - family detached residential dwellings on a minimum lot size of 6,600 square feet, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. This district is intended to be developed using the more contemporary building styles and allowing those dwellings to be constructed on relatively small lots. 4- 4iin e o 1-0 -. The maximum size tract that can be maned R -7 is 40 acres. Single- Family Residential /Agricultural District (RA). Intended to provide for areas in which agricultural land may be held in such use for as long as is practical and reasonable. Residences in this District are intended to be on a minimum lot size of 21,780 square feet (one -half acre). This District is suitable for areas where development is premature due to lack of utilities, capacity or service, and for areas that are unsuitable for development because of physical restraints or potential health or safety hazards. (Supp. No. 5) Page 1 of 3 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:08 [EST] Garden Homes Residential District (GH). Comprised of single - family detached residential dwellings on a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. This District allows the main structure to be constructed coincident with one (1) of the side property lines, and requires only one (1) side yard setback in order to maximize lot usage and yet maintain a neighborhood character consistent with conventional single - family detached homes. No area shall be designated GH that contains less than five (5) adjoining lots on a street. Zero lot line homes shall have no windows on the side of the house, which abuts the property line. Entire frontage of one (1) side of the street in the block must be included in the GH designation. Exception may be made where an alley breaks the block on that side of the street. Homes will be uniformly located on the same side of the lot within a street block. Townhome District (TH). Comprised of an attached residential dwelling unit in structures built to accommodate three (3) to six (6) units per structure. Density shall not exceed twelve (12) units per gross acre. Townhome units shall be constructed on a single lot, or on adjacent individual lots. Individual ownership of the townhome units is encouraged. Minimum lot area shall not be less than 2,500 square feet per dwelling unit. Ten percent (10 %) of the total platted area shall be provided as common, usable open space. This District should not be located in areas where it would increase traffic through single - family neighborhoods and should be adjacent to arterial streets with sufficient capacity to carry the increased traffic generated. K. Manufactured Home Subdivision District (MHS). Intended to recognize that certain areas of the City are suitable for a mixture of single - family dwelling units and HUD -Code manufactured homes, to provide adequate space and site diversification for residential purposes designed to accommodate the peculiarities and design criteria of manufactured homes, along with single - family residences, to promote the most desirable use of land and direction of building development, to promote stability of development, to protect the character of the district, to conserve the value of land and buildings, and to protect the City's tax base. This District provides for the creation and /or subdivision of any lot, tract or parcel of land used for the placement of manufactured homes. This District is not intended to prohibit or unduly restrict any type of housing but to ensure compatibility in housing types between manufactured home subdivisions and surrounding single family residential subdivisions and recognizing their inherent differences. L. Manufactured Home Park District (MHP). Intended to provide adequate space and site diversification for residential purposes designed to accommodate the peculiarities and design criteria of manufactured homes, to promote the most desirable use of land and direction of building development, to promote stability of development, to protect the character of the district, to conserve the value of land and buildings, and to protect the City's tax base. This District provides for the creation of tracts of land used for the placement of multiple manufactured homes on a single lot, tract or parcel of land and utilized for rent or lease. This District is not intended to prohibit or unduly restrict any type of housing but to ensure compatibility between manufactured home parks and surrounding properties and recognizing the inherent differences in housing types between manufactured home parks and other residential districts. M. Agricultural District (AD). Intended to provide as a base zoning district in areas designated as agricultural conservation on the North and South Schertz Framework Plans. Residences in this District are intended to be on a minimum lot size of 217,800 square feet (five acres). Clustering of up to two homes may be allowed on the same lot subject to setback requirements. This District is suitable for areas where development is premature due to lack of utilities, capacity or service, and for areas that are unsuitable for development because of physical restraints or potential health or safety hazards. Main Street Mixed -Use District (MSMU). Intended to provide a base zoning district in the area along Main Street. In light of the history of the area and variety of land uses that exist, this zoning district allows for both single - family residential uses and low intensity commercial uses. Reduced setbacks and parking requirements are provided as part of this district due to physical restraints. (Supp. No. 5) Page 2 of 3 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:08 [EST] 0. Main Street Mixed -Use New Development District (MSMU -ND). Intended to provide a base zoning district in the area along Main Street, specifically for new development of existing properties. This district is intended to mirror The Main Street Mixed -Use District (MSMU), allowing for both single - family residential uses and low intensity commercial uses. Reduced setbacks, parking requirements, along with reduced landscape buffers are provided as part of this district due to physical restraints of the existing properties. ( Ord. No. 13 -5 -22, § 2, 7 -16 -2013 ; Ord. No. 14-S-47, § 2, 11 -18 -2014; Ord. No. 21-S-26, § 1(Exh. A), 7 -6 -2021) (Supp. No. 5) Page 3 of 3 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:08 [EST] Sec. 21.5.2. Zoning Districts Establishedi The City is hereby geographically divided into zoning districts and the boundaries of those districts herein are delineated upon the Official Zoning Map of the City. The use and dimensional regulations as set out in this Article are uniform in each district. Zoning districts are established in compliance with adopted Comprehensive Land Plan and Master Thoroughfare Plan. The districts established shall be known as follows: Table 21.5.2 Symbol Zoning District Name PRE Predevelopment District R -1 Single - Family Residential District R -2 Single - Family Residential District R -3 Two - Family Residential District R -4 Apartment /Multi - Family Residential District R -6 Single - Family Residential Districts 404-2-94 R -7 Single - Family Residential District- (-5-;Pr -G d+nap , R -A Single - Family Residential /Agricultural District GH Garden Home Residential District TH Townhome District MHS Manufactured Home Subdivision District MHP Manufactured Home Park District OP Office and Professional District NS Neighborhood Services District GB General Business District GB -2 General Business District -2 M -1 Manufacturing District (Light) M -2 Manufacturing District (Heavy) GC Golf Course District PUB Public Use District PDD Planned Development District AD Agricultural District AC Agricultural Conservation District EN Estate Neighborhood PDD MU Mixed Use District HCOD Highway Commercial Design Overlay District CCOD Campus Commercial Overlay District IOD Industrial Overlay District DO Downtown Overlay Districts MSMU Main Street Mixed -Use District ( Ord. No. 13 -S -22, § 1, 7 -16 -2013 ; Ord. No. 14-S-47, § 1, 11 -18 -2014) (Supp. No. 5) Page 1 of 1 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:07 [EST] - SCHERTZ UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE ARTICLE 10. PARKING STANDARDS ARTICLE 10. PARKING STANDARDS Sec. 21.10.1. Purpose. The purpose of this Article is to establish the number of required off - street vehicular parking spaces so as to provide for the needs of occupants, customers, visitors or others involved in the use or occupancy of any building or structure, to eliminate the undue use of the surface street system for parking purposes, to require allocation of sufficient off - street /on -site loading facilities by business and industry which ensures that the loading and unloading of vehicles will not interfere with traffic flow or block roadways and /or fire lanes, to promote and protect the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare, and to grant and define the administrative powers and duties necessary to enforce this Article. Sec. 21.10.2. General provisions. A. Required off - street parking in residential districts shall be provided on the same site, lot or tract as the main use for which the parking is provided. B. Required off - street parking in nonresidential districts may be located on the same site, lot or tract as the main use for which the parking is provided or on a site, lot or tract located within the same zoning district and within 150 feet of the main use. C. If specific requirements for off - street parking result in a fraction of a parking space, the next larger whole number of spaces is required. D. Whenever a building or use constructed or established after the effective date of this UDC is changed or enlarged in floor area, number of dwelling units, seating capacity or otherwise, to create a need for an increase in the minimum number of required parking spaces, such spaces shall be provided to accommodate the enlargement or change. E. All driveways and all required off - street parking spaces shall be on a paved concrete or asphalt surface. All drive approaches shall be of paved concrete. F. Parking spaces provided within a public right -of -way shall not be counted as meeting the minimum requirements of this Article. G. In the event of the construction of a phased development, the minimum number of parking spaces provided shall apply to each phase as it is developed. H. In computing the parking requirements for any building or development with multiple uses, the total parking requirements shall be the sum of the specific parking requirements for each individual use included in the building or development. I. Residential curb cuts. Straight driveways. Curb cuts for residential driveway aprons shall be not less than ten feet (10') in width, and not more than twelve feet (12') in width for a single driveway apron nor more than twenty - four feet (24') in width for a double driveway apron. Curb cuts will be permitted only for driveway aprons providing access to a garage, carport or hardstand. Not more than one curb cut will be permitted for each residential parcel of land except as follows for circular driveways. Schertz, Texas, Unified Development Code (Supp. No. 5) Page 1 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:10 [EST] Circular driveways. Circular driveways are allowed for lots with a minimum of one hundred feet (100') of frontage. Circular driveways shall have a maximum of two sixteen -foot curb cuts with a minimum of thirty feet (30') between each cut. Detached accessory, ancillary or storage structures in commercial and manufacturing districts shall not be located in a manner that decreases the minimum number of parking spaces required. K. Areas intended for outdoor displays and general outdoor storage shall not be allowed in designated off - street parking areas or fire lanes and shall not be located in a manner that decreases the minimum number of parking spaces required. L., Parking and storage, including vehicles awaiting re air, em as o tee, customers and vendors, for automoblle reaairs and service located on Brain Street, c: <nnot occur in the pub0ic right -of -way_ Sec. 21.10.3. Size of space. A. Each standard off - street surface parking space shall measure not less than ten feet by 20 feet, exclusive of access drives and aisles, and shall be of usable shape and condition. B. Wheel stops. Wheel stops shall be required for all areas of head -in parking adjacent to a landscaped area required in section 21.9.7. Wheel stops shall be designed so that the overhang of vehicles is contained totally within the parking space. If wheel stops are not provided at locations where vehicles extend over the sidewalk areas, a minimum of five feet (5') of free walking area, exclusive of vehicle over hang, width must be provided. C. Each parking space designed for parallel parking shall have a minimum dimension of eight feet by twenty - two feet (8'x 22'). D. Each standard parking space located in a parking garage shall measure not less than ten feet by eighteen feet (10' x 18'), exclusive of access drives or aisles. E. Handicap accessible parking. The number and size of the handicap parking spaces required must follow the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act and Texas Accessibility Standards. The number of handicap parking spaces required is based on the total number of spaces provided. Accessible spaces for cars must have at least a sixty inch (60 ") wide access aisle located adjacent to the designated parking space. Van parking spaces need to have a wider access aisle of ninety -six inches (96 ") to accommodate a wheelchair lift and vertical clearance to accommodate van height. Table 21.10.3 Minimum Number of Handicap Accessible Parking Spaces Total number of parking spaces provided (per lot) Total minimum number of accessible parking spaces 1 to 25 1 26 to 50 2 51 to 75 3 76 to 100 4 101 to 150 5 151 to 200 6 201 to 300 7 301 to 400 8 401 to 500 9 501 to 1,000 2% of total parking provided in lot 1,001 and over 20 plus 1 for each 100 over 1,000 (Supp. No. 5) Page 2 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:09 [EST] Location. Accessible parking spaces must be located on the shortest accessible route of travel to an accessible facility entrance. Where buildings have multiple accessible entrances with adjacent parking, the accessible parking spaces must be dispersed and located closest to the accessible entrances and at the most level ground close to the accessible entrance. An accessible route must always be provided from the accessible parking to the accessible entrance. An accessible route never has curbs or stairs, must be at least three feet (3') wide, and has a firm, stable, slip- resistant surface. The slope along the accessible route should not be greater than 1:12 in the direction of travel. C. Accessible parking spaces may be clustered in one or more lots if equivalent or greater accessibility is provided in terms of distance from the accessible entrance, parking fees, and convenience. Van - accessible parking spaces located in parking garages may be clustered on one floor (to accommodate the ninety -eight inch (98 ") minimum vertical height requirement). Signage. A sign with the international symbol of accessibility must be mounted in accordance with applicable state and federal laws to see marking each disabled parking space. Van accessible spaces must have a sign with "van accessible" on it in addition to the international symbol of accessibility. Sec. 21.10.4. Schedule of off- street parking requirements. A. Off - street parking shall be provided in sufficient quantities to provide the following ratio of vehicle spaces for the uses specified in the districts designated: Table 21.10.4 Schedule of Off - Street Parking Requirements Use Type Parking Requirement Amusement, Commercial (Indoor) 1 space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area Amusement, Commercial (Outdoor) 1 space per 500 square feet of outdoor site area plus 1 space per each 4 fixed spectator seats Assisted Care, Living Facility, Care Facility 1 parking space for each 2 beds Bank, Savings And Loan, Or Other Financial Institution 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area Bar Or Night Club 1 space for each 50 square feet of gross floor area Bed And Breakfast 1 space for each guest room plus 1 space per employee Bowling Alley 5 parking spaces for each lane Car Wash 1 space for each 200 Square feet of floor area Day Care Center 1 space per 250 square feet of gross floor area Fitness Center /Gym 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area Convenience Store /Gas Station 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area. Spaces provided for fueling at the pump stations shall not be considered parking spaces. Group Home 4 spaces Hospital 1 parking space for each bed Hotel Or Motel 1 space for each sleeping room or suite plus 1 space for every 200 square feet of common area not designated as sleeping rooms Lodging Houses And Boarding Houses 1 parking space for each bedroom (Supp. No. 5) Page 3 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:10 [EST] Manufacturing, Processing Or Repairing 1 space for each 2 employees or 1 space for each 1,000 square feet of total floor area, whichever is greater Medical Or Dental Clinic 1 space for each 200 square feet of total floor area Mini - warehouse /Public Storage 1 space for each 300 square feet of office floor area plus 1 space for each 3,000 square feet of storage area Mortuary /Funeral Home 1 parking space for each 50 square feet of floor space in service rooms or 1 space for each 3 seats, whichever is less based on maximum design capacity) Multifamily, Duplex, Two - Family, Condominium Or 1.5 spaces per 1 bedroom unit Other Similar Use 2 spaces per 2 bedroom unit 2.5 spaces per 3+ bedroom unit Plus additional guest parking provided at a ratio of 5% of required spaces Nursery 1 space per 300 square feet of total sales area Wholesale nursery: 1 parking space per employee of the largest work shift, plus 1 space per 10,000 square feet of display area and 1 space per acre of growing areas Offices 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area Outdoor Facilities (Outdoor Recreational Fields i.e. 20 spaces per designated field or 1 per 4 person Football, Soccer, etc.) design capacity Public Use Parking shall be provided at a ratio approved by City staff based on a parking study provided by the applicant Residence Halls, Fraternity Buildings And Sorority 1 space per person capacity of permanent sleeping Buildings facilities Residential Subdivision Mailbox Kiosk 2 spaces — these maw be in the ri ht- of.waoa but not in the traffic lane — an ex ansion of the road surface is regui ed and the kiosk rust be cc veLed t�rraca�rid , shelter fo[_p.go ale d�smn the kiosk Restaurants 1 parking space for each 100 square feet of gross floor area, or 1 space for each 4 seats, whichever is less (based on maximum design capacity) Retail Sales And Service 1 space for each 250 square feet of gross floor area School, High School, Vocational, All Other Schools Parking shall be provided at a ratio approved by City staff based on a parking study provided by the applicant that shall include vehicle stacking requirements Single Family Attached And Detached Dwelling Units 2 parking spaces per dwelling unit Theaters, Auditoriums, Churches, Assembly Halls, 1 space for each 4 seats or 1 space for every 100 Sports Arenas, Stadiums, Conference Center, square feet of gross floor area, whichever is less Convention Center, Dance Hall, Exhibition Halls, Or (based on maximum design capacity) Other Place Of Public Assembly Automobile Sales Or Rental 1 space for each 3,000 square feet of sales area (open and enclosed) devoted to the sale, display or rental of vehicles Automobile Service, Repair, Garage 1 space for each 200 square feet of total floor area Warehouse 1 space for each 1,000 square feet of total floor area (Supp. No. 5) Page 4 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:10 [EST] B. New and Unlisted Uses. When a proposed land use is not classified in this section or a single use which have varying parking needs depending on the function of that specific single use, an applicant may submit a parking ratio based on best /current planning and transportation practices. 1. A best /current parking ratio application should include the following: a. An application shall fully cite the sources used to derive the applicant- submitted parking ratio, possible resources include parking standards material from the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) or the American Planning Association (APA). b. The City Manager or his /her designee shall review the applicant submitted parking ratio to confirm best /current planning practices for a use. C. The City Manager or his /her designee shall approve, modify, or deny the applicant submitted parking ratio. 2. Parking ratio determination where no application is submitted a. If the applicant does not submit a parking ratio, then the City Manager or his /her designee shall determine the parking ratio based on the best /current planning and transportation practices. C. Mixed uses. In the event that several users occupy a single structure, or parcels of land, the total requirements for off street parking shall be the sum of the requirements for the several uses computed separately unless it can be shown that the peak parking demands are offset, for example with retail and residential, or theater and office uses. In such case the City Manager or his /her designee may reduce the total requirements accordingly, but not more than twenty -five percent (25 %). D. Joint use of facilities. Required parking facilities of two (2) or more uses, structures, or parcels of land may be satisfied by the same parking facility used jointly, to the extent that it can be shown by the owners or operators that the need for the facilities does not materially overlap and provided that such right of joint use is evidenced by a deed, lease, contract, or similar written instrument establishing the joint use. Properties zoned main street mixed -use. Properties zoned Main Street Mixed -Use shall only be required to provide two (2) on -site parking spaces but must still provide the minimum required number of handicapped spaces on site. (Ord. No. 14-S-47, § 5, 11 -18 -2014; Ord. No. 16-S-27, § 7, 8 -30 -2016; Ord. No. 18 -S -03 , § 1(Exh. A), 1 -23 -2018) Sec. 21.10.5. Striping. A. All parking lots shall be striped in a manner that will clearly delineate parking spaces, fire lanes and pedestrian crosswalks. B. Directional arrows shall be provided in all drive lanes and driveways. Sec. 21.10.6. Shared access and cross lot access easements. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this UDC, unless otherwise approved by the City, to reduce the number of curb cuts and access driveways, the dedication of joint -use, private access driveway easements and cross lot access easements shall be required for all commercial development. (Supp. No. 5) Page 5 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:10 [EST] Sec. 21.10.7. Stacking requirement for drive - through facilities. A. A stacking space shall be an area on a site measuring eight feet by twenty feet (8'x 20') with direct forward access to a service window or station of a drive - through facility which does not constitute space for any other circulation driveway, parking space, or maneuvering area. B. All stacking spaces shall be located entirely within the lot and shall be outside of any right -of -way, fire lane or similar access. C. For financial institutions with drive - through facilities, each teller window or station, human or mechanical, shall be provided with a minimum of five stacking spaces. D. For each service window of a drive - through restaurant, a minimum of seven stacking spaces shall be provided. E. For kiosks, a minimum of three (3) stacking spaces for each service window shall be provided. Sec. 21.10.8. Off - Street loading /unloading requirements. All retail, commercial, industrial and service structures shall provide and maintain off - street facilities for receiving and loading merchandise, supplies and materials within a building or on the lot or tract. All public schools shall provide adequate stacking for vehicles based on a parking study approved by City Staff. Such off - street loading space may be adjacent to a public alley or private service drive or may consist of a truck berth within the structure. Such off - street loading space or truck berth shall consist of a minimum area of ten feet (10') by forty feet (40') and the spaces or berths shall be provided in accordance with the following schedule: Table 21.10.8 Off - Street Loading Requirements Square Feet of Gross Floor Area in Structure Minimum Required Spaces or Berths 0 -5,000 None 5,000 - 15,000 1 15,000- 50,000 2 50,000 - 100,000 3 100,000- 150,000 4 Each Additional 50,000 over 150,000 1 (Ord. No. 16-S-27, § 8, 8 -30 -2016) Sec. 21.10.9. Additional regulations and illustrations. A. Handicapped ramps. (Supp. No. 5) Page 6 of 9 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:10 [EST] A 4' WA,VI,--A—PVT> RAW WMIMM I P 4 FAF4XZrz 5PACE,5 ALL wI'NIq 26, PANDICAPPED F-AMP5., within 26, 0 or Tho L&rte Ot c 1, Sc�61ble- r-,16per&s& In a ft14 Icing Of b (< -.Pnswc ana tc� lnv"Ize- tf,�� L-av�-I dutaee-R, for (he B. Handicapped parking space dispersal. L ,4ANtDIG,4ffffEQ FAFKIN',G C. 90° parking dimensions. (Supp. No. 5) Page 7 of 9 Created: 2021-11-05 10:19:10 [EST] �cm D. Angle parking dimensions. AMA L-7 FAFZ<INGi EDIMENSIONIC�, Drive aisle dimensions. (Supp. No. 5) Page 8 of 9 Created: 2021-11-05 10:19:10 [EST] NrziLE FARKNG ROW 25IRM NOTE& 4 11, b L Mal �-uksjdm zuxw;m or �M=2_0 1516nds Cq Separation of right-of way and parking areas. Lot &-, C,,-b FV�Ilc 5treat Face of Cub G. Landscaping and fencing. Rle�-g of ujay (Supp. No. 5) tr*e,s and plant'sa tc> ylsuaEk� softem the oolld'Terxce Page 9 of 9 Created: 2021-11-05 10:19:10 [EST] Sec. 21.9.10. - Park and Open Space Dedication Requirements. A. Purpose. 1. The purpose of this section is to provide for the adequate provision of parkland and open space to meet the needs of a growing City population; for improvements to existing parkland; for establishment, maintenance and operation of a Parkland Dedication Fund; establish requirements and procedures for governing required dedications of parkland or improvements to existing parkland by subdividers of land; and for cash payments -in -lieu of land by subdividers of land in certain cases. 2. It is hereby declared by the City Council that recreational areas in the form of parks and open spaces are necessary and for the public welfare and that the only adequate procedure to provide for parkland and park improvements is by integrating such a requirement into the procedure for planning and developing property or subdivisions in the City, whether such development consists of new residential construction on vacant land or the addition of new dwelling units on existing residential land. It is the policy of the City to require subdividers of residential subdivisions and lots to provide for parkland and park facilities at the time of development approval in proportion to the need for such improvements created by the developments and in proportion to the benefits received from contribution of such facilities. B. Applicability. The parkland dedication and park development requirements of this section shall be applicable to every residential subdivision developed under the provisions of this UDC, whether such subdivision consists of new residential construction on vacant land or the addition of new dwelling units on existing residential land, within the City limits or the City's ETJ. C. Submittal Requirements. 1. Prior to Submittal of a Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary Plat, a General Parks Plan shall be submitted and shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: a. location and size of any proposed parks to be dedicated to the public or to be retained as private parkland; b. a statement of the suitability of the parkland in meeting the criteria in subsection H. of this section; c. a general park development plan including any proposed improvements; and d. a phasing plan. 2. Prior to submittal of a Final Plat, a Detailed Parks Plan shall be submitted and shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: a. location and size of the proposed park; b. a statement of the suitability of the parkland in meeting the criteria in subsection H. of this section; and c. a detailed plan of any proposed improvements, including cost. 3. The Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services shall review the General Parks Plan and make a recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission prior to approval of a Subdivision Master Plan or Preliminary Plat. Recommendations should be based upon the Comprehensive Land Plan and /or the Parks and Open Space Master Plan as adopted by the City, and the standards and provisions contained herein regarding the amount and location of park land and fees -in -lieu of park land dedication. 4. All parkland to be dedicated to the City shall meet the suitability requirements of section 21.9.10.H. D. Parkland Dedication Requirements. 1. Land Dedication. A final plat establishing a residential (including multifamily) subdivision or commercial or manufacturing district either within the City or within the ETJ of the City shall contain the dedication of an area of land for park purposes meeting the requirements set out in this oeotion, or notation signed by the Director ofParks, Recreation and Community Services of receipt of an approved cash payment-in-lieu of land. The subdivider of a residential (including multifamily) subdivision or commercial or manufacturing district shall dedicate to the City developed parkland in the amount as established within the fee schedule adopted by the City Council. A proposed plat submitted for approval must: o. show the location and dimensions of the area proposed to be dedicated for parkland; b. show the number ofdwelling units to be located within the proposed residential subdivision (whether single or multi-family units) orLUEu in a commercial or manufacturing district; o. to|| whether all or any part of the property to be dedicated an a park is located in a special flood hazard area, ao such areas are defined in this UDC; and d. show the proposed streets and utilities bo serve the parcel huba dedicated aoparkland. Development mf Areas Smaller Than Five (5) Acres. The development of park areas smaller than five (S) acres for public park purposes is deemed to be impractical. |f fewer than five (S) acres are proposed to be created by e p|ad, dbon prior hofiling the p|et, the subdivider shall be required to pay to the City the applicable cash payment-in-lieu of land. No plat showing a dedication of less than five (5) acres for a public park shall be approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. While dedication of parkland to the City in an amount less than five (5) acres is deemed impraotioo|, it is the City's policy to encourage the development of private parkland in accordance with subsection I below and provide credit for development of these private parklands accordingly. 3. Dedication Procedures. The owner of property for a residential subdivision shall be required at final p|nd approval to dedicate parkland. Dedication of parkland shall be evidenced by formal dedication on the plat to be recorded. The land so dedicated and conveyed shall not be subject to any reservations of record, encumbrances of any kind, or easements, which in the opinion of the City will interfere with or materially increase the cost ofmaking such land available for parks or recreational purposes. 4. Development of Subdivision /n Phases. |fa subdivision iatobe developed in phases and the final platting of the park area to be dedicated is to be included in a future phaoe, then the subdivider shall be required to provide a notation on the plat which acknowledges that dedication of parkland to serve said subdivision will occur with the platting of future phases. 5. Right to AcceptlReject Land. If the City determines that sufficient park area is already in the public domain within proximity of the proposed deve|upment, or if the naonaution needs for the area would be better served by expanding or improving existing parks, the City has the right to accept the dedication or to refuse same and require a cash payment-in-lieu of land. 0. Con?p&ynna with Parks and Open Space Master Plan. The City has adopted a Parks and Open Space Master Plan which outlines the necessity for parkland dedication and the types of improvements deemed appropriate for the City. The dedication and development of any parkland and the expenditure of any fees-in-lieu of dedication or development shall be in accordance with the Parks and Open Space Master Plan cf the City. E. Fee-in-Lieuof Land Dedication Rightto Request Waiver of Dedication Requirements. A subdivider obligated to make a dedication of land may request the City waive the required dedication of land, in whole or in part, and to accept a cash payment-in-lieu of land dedication. Any request for a waiver to the land dedication requirements nho|| be subject to review and recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and final approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission. Required Fee-in-Lieu of Land Dedication. Any subdivider who in required to make o cash payment-in-lieu of land dedication or who is granted a waiver in accordance with snnUnn 21.9.10. 1. above, shall make a cash payment-in-lieu of land in accordance with this section. The amount of such cash payment-in-lieu of land shall be calculated by multiplying the number of dwelling units proposed to be established by the plat times the amount per dwelling unit as established in the fee schedule set from time to time by the City Council. A cash payment -in -lieu of land shall be made prior to the recordation of the final plat. Parkland Improvement Agreement. The property owner or applicant may request to defer the obligation to dedicate parklands and /or develop parklands until after a final plat recordation. The request shall be submitted in writing and specify what is requested for deferral. Deferral of the obligation to dedicate parkland and /or develop parklands shall be conditioned on execution of an Improvement Agreement and provision of sufficient security, pursuant to Section 21.4.15.F, Improvement Agreements. The City Manager or his /her designee may approve or deny the request to defer obligations to dedicate parkland dedication and /or develop parklands. G. Park Development. A subdivider who elects to dedicate parkland in accordance with section 21.9.10.D. above shall improve all dedicated public parkland with improvements approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board and the City Parks and Recreation Department. Design, specification, and construction of the improvements shall be subject to review and approval by the City. Construction of the improvements must be completed within one (1) year of the approval of the final plat of the subdivision. No final plat shall be recorded for any subdivision in which completion of the required improvements has not been accepted by the City; however, in the event that a subdivider requests that a final plat be approved prior to completion of the required improvements, surety for construction of improvements may be provided in the same manner as required of other subdivision- and site - related construction. In -lieu of constructing the improvements required in section 21.9.10.F.1. above, the subdivider may elect to make a cash payment -in -lieu of construction to the City to meet the City's current or future recreational needs. If a developer who has dedicated land in accordance with section 21.9.10.D. above elects to make a fee -in -lieu of payment for park development, the City shall utilize those funds for improvement of parkland within the subdivision in which the funds are collected. In the event there are remaining funds after development of said parkland, the City may utilize the remaining funds to complete improvements in any public park within the City. If the subdivider elects to pay fees -in -lieu of parkland dedication in accordance with section 21.9.10.E. above, then the subdivider shall make a cash payment -in -lieu of construction to the City for the required improvements in addition to the fees paid -in- lieu of dedication. Cash payments made in accordance with this paragraph may be utilized to complete improvements in any public park within the City. 4. Cash payments -in -lieu of required improvements shall be calculated by multiplying the number of dwelling units times the price per dwelling unit as established in the fee schedule set from time to time by the City Council. H. Parkland Dedication Fund. Special Fund. The City shall reserve all fee -in -lieu of payments and any accrued interest from the fee -in -lieu of parkland dedication or fee -in -lieu of parkland development in a separate account from the general funds of the City. This fund shall be known as the Parkland Dedication Fund. Deposit/Expenditure of Parkland Dedication Fund. The City shall deposit sums collected as cash payments -in -lieu of land and cash payments -in -lieu of improvements in the Parkland Dedication Fund. The City shall expend such funds collected for the acquisition of land or for the improvement of existing parks on a first in, first out basis. Records and Method of Expenditure. The City shall maintain records detailing the receipts and expenditures for the Parkland Dedication Fund. All funds deposited as credit for fee -in -lieu of parkland dedication may be utilized for the acquisition and /or development of parkland within the City. All funds collected as fee -in -lieu of parkland development shall be utilized for the development of parkland in accordance with section 21.9.10.F. above. 1. Parkland Design Criteria. Location. Any land to be dedicated to meet the requirements of this section shall be reasonably located and adaptable for use as parkland and /or recreation facility, consistent with the most recent edition of the Comprehensive Land Plan and /or Parks and Open Space Master Plan as adopted by the City Council. 2. Land Suitability. The Parks and Recreation Advisory Board shall make recommendations to the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding the suitability of proposed park land. The location, access, size, shape, topography, natural drainage, utilities, parking facilities, and wooded areas and other vegetative cover of the parcel or tract of land to be dedicated shall be appropriate for public parks and recreation purposes. All such park land shall be designated and located so as to satisfy the requirements of this section. 3. Usable Land. At least fifty percent (50 %) of proposed parkland dedication site shall be level, well drained and suitable for open play. Such land shall be located outside of any one hundred (100) year floodplain or any other special flood zone identified on the most recently approve FEMA FIRM map and shall not exceed five percent (5 %) slope. 4. Access. Access to parkland designated on a subdivision plat shall be provided by the dedication of at least 200 feet of street frontage in a manner satisfactory to the City, preferably at the corner of two (2) intersecting streets. When the land abutting the designated parkland is developed, the subdivider of such abutting land shall furnish and pay for all paving of all abutting street frontage. Utilities. Potable water and wastewater connections shall be readily available at the park site with water and wastewater lines located along the street frontage. The applicant must demonstrate to the satisfaction of the City that sufficient living unit equivalents that are not otherwise committed to other property are available to serve the park within these water and wastewater lines. Drainage Improvements. Any detention ponds and /or other drainage facilities to be constructed in areas that are to be dedicated as parkland must be designed and constructed to also allow for recreational use. The subdivider may be required to demonstrate that the design, placement and construction of such ponds meet the requirements of the City. Floodplain. The following standards shall apply to all land proposed for dedication or parkland which is located in a FEMA designated floodplain or other special flood hazard area. a. Amount of Credit. Every acre of proposed dedicated parkland located within the floodplain or other special flood hazard area shall count as one -half ('/2) acre of land towards the total parkland dedication requirement. b. Criteria for Parkland. Floodplain areas will be considered for eligibility as land to be dedicated based on the following criteria: i. The floodplain area is easily accessible and has adequate street frontage. ii. There has been minimal alteration of the natural character of the waterway and the floodplain area. Some improvements are necessary for City access and maintenance. iii. In no case will floodplain areas be accepted which are less than one hundred feet (100') in width. iv. The area's configuration and topography is suitable for the placement of low impact facilities such as playgrounds, picnic facilities and open play fields. Disturbed Area. Any disturbed parkland shall be restored and the soil stabilized by a vegetative cover by the subdivider. Disclosures. Prior to dedication of parkland, the subdivider shall make full disclosure of the presence of any hazardous substances and /or underground storage tanks (USTs) of which the subdivider has knowledge. The City, at its discretion, may proceed to conduct such initial environmental tests and surveys on the land as it may deem appropriate, and the subdivider shall grant to the City and its agents and employees such reasonable access to the land as is necessary to conduct such surveys and tests. If the results of such surveys and tests indicate a reasonable possibility of environmental contamination or the presence of USTs, the City may require further survey and tests to be performed at the subdivider's expense as the City may deem necessary prior to its acceptance of the dedication, or in the alternative, the subdivider may be required to identify alternative property or pay the fees -in -lieu of such parkland dedication. 10. Trash and Debris. The park site shall be free of trash and debris. If the condition of the dedicated parkland is disturbed during construction of subdivision improvements then the subdivider shall be responsible for returning the dedicated land to its previous condition prior to or at the time of final plat filing. The public improvements to be constructed per the applicable subdivision plat will not be accepted by the City until such time that the above conditions have been met. 11. Areas not Meeting the Minimum Requirements. In the event that areas proposed for dedication do not meet the grade, slope, or other requirements for parkland dedication found in this section, but are known to contain sensitive environmental features, the City may, at its discretion and after review by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, modify the standards of this section subject to the following limitations: a. that such areas shall provide recreational or educational opportunities for the surrounding community in -lieu of parkland dedication; b. that such areas shall be given a partial credit against the requirement of land dedication and /or payment of fees; and c. that such areas shall meet any additional standards deemed necessary by the Planning and Zoning Commission after a recommendation by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board, pertaining to the dedication of land containing sensitive environmental features. Private Parks. Private Parkland Required. It is the intent of the City to provide for adequate areas of parkland within every subdivision as deemed practical by the City. All residential subdivisions developed after the effective date of this UDC that do not dedicate land in accordance with Paragraph D above, shall be required to dedicate an area as private parkland or open space. The amount of parkland dedicated and amenities provided shall be approved by the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. - ufi m li enerai b .a follows: 435.5 s uare feet f rivate open sraauLe hich e gates to one acre er 1 f�0 Lots fear the first 250 single famfly residentual loth 17. s_ uare feet of �arivate o aen s a o which gat irk one -half acre user lot) �ar ever additional sin 9e fa it res�deratia Ic?t over 200 lot. . Private op w�� ac,e shall not tae si Qlifocar�tl encumbered b gt'slit easements and malt be located within drain e ea ernemts. d c en ace being,., rovided must enerall be at least one -half acre in size. e, o era s ace shall be located so as to be eaii accessibie b lots wittain the subdivision. Credit for Private Parkland. Up to fifty percent (50 %) in area of a subdivision's total parkland dedication requirement may be satisfied through the dedication of a private park within the subdivision. Up to fifty percent (50 %) of the parkland development fee may be satisfied through the development of a private park within the subdivision. Maintenance of Private Parks. The subdivider must submit a condominium declaration, homeowner's agreement or similar document which establishes the private ownership and maintenance responsibility of any private park areas together with a mechanism for funding the maintenance of the park established to meet the requirements of this section. In addition, a plat note must be included on the preliminary plat and final plat stating the ownership and maintenance responsibility of all private park areas. 4. Requirement of Continued Use. A restrictive covenant shall be recorded at the time of the recording of the plat, which covenant shall run with the land subdivided. The covenant shall restrict use of private parks and facilities to park and recreational purposes and must be submitted for approval by the City prior to final plat acceptance. Security for Performance. The City may require financial assurances from the subdivider that the private park will be developed and completed, with assurances that a failure by the subdivider to timely complete the improvements to the park shall result in dedication of the private park to the City and the proceeds of the financial assurances as offered become the property of the City for use in completing the park. (()rd. No. 17-S-4f_ § l(Bxh. A) 10-24-2017) Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non - residential Districts in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non - residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor storage and display shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS GB and PUB GB -2, M -1 and M -2 Outdoor Display - P P P and Tempo- rary Outdoor Storage General Outdoor - - - P Storage (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated ( -) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. Categories of outdoor storage and display. Outdoor Display and Temporary Outdoor Storage. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage are displays of items actively for sale or lease that are lightweight and that individually can be easily moved without a mechanical lifting device. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage of goods in individual packaging and not in storage containers which are associated with the primary business on the site may be allowed adjacent to a front principal building wall and may not extend into the public right -of -way. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. Areas intended for outdoor display must be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off - street parking areas. No outdoor displays shall be allowed in off - street parking areas or fire lanes. General Outdoor Storage. a. General outdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of outdoor storage not classified as outdoor display including items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities /containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. b. General outdoor storage is prohibited within the public right -of -way or fire lane. C. General outdoor storage shall not be allowed in off - street parking spaces. d. General outdoor storage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height. e. General outdoor storage items shall be completely enclosed or shall be moved to the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right -of -way. 3. Outdoor Display and Storage Requirements. (Supp. No. 5) All outdoor display and storage areas must be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property. Page 1 of 2 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:09 [EST] Unless specifically authorized elsewhere in the City's ordinances, all outdoor display and storage areas shall be located outside the public right -of -way. Exceptions. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. C. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicies-awarting-Lepqir , fool trucks and trailers associated with a business _a p for A Pemn to Ilow_ sar_kin on _an_iLnpaved,are a fora riod_ riot to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. The City Manaeer or his/her designee shall receive aonlications. documentation and u >sue errr:its for the ternorar�r „aarkirfi on an unpaved areas during construction or other unic]ue dreUrnstances such as pgj s shorta es as the result of a pandemic. C. Effective Dates. Temporary Limited Non - Conforming Use. Outdoor displays or outdoor storage (temporary or general) described in subsection 21.8.9.8. located on a site on April 30, 2010; in compliance with the provisions of this UDC as in effect on April 12, 2010; and in good working order and actively being used for its intended display or storage purpose on April 30, 2010 may remain in the same location on such site, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.13. until the earliest to occur of the following: a. the removal of such display or storage from its precise location on April 30, 2010; or b. the failure of the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage to operate or use such display or storage in the manner intended and in effect on April 30, 2010 for a period of three (3) consecutive business days; or c. the reduction in height of any such display or storage that would be governed by subsection 21.8.9.B.2.d. to less than 20 feet (20'); or d. the destruction or damage of such display or storage to the extent of twenty -five (25 %) or more of its area or value; or e. December 31, 2013. During such period, the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage may perform minor repair or maintenance of such display or storage and may replace any unit of such display offered for sale or lease that is sold or leased with a like unit offered for sale or lease but shall not substitute other types of items for sale or lease in such display, and shall not replace, enlarge or substitute storage facilities or storage areas that do not comply with subsection 21.8.9.13. In all events, none of such displays or storage shall be in a condition of disrepair or non - operation. 2. Other Outdoor Displays or Outdoor Storage. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage not described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be in compliance with the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.13. on and after May 1, 2010. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be discontinued within thirty (30) days after the earliest to occur of the condition described in subsections 21.8.9.C.1.a. —e. (Supp. No. 5) Page 2 of 2 Created: 2021 -11 -05 10:19:09 [EST] TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: PC2022 -015 SUBJECT: PC2022 -015 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Harral Subdivision, an approximately 26 acre tract of land located at the southwest corner of FM 482 and Hubertus Road, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Comal Independent School District, Jeffrey Smith/ Director of Comal ISD Applicant: Pape- Dawson Engineers, Ricardo Gomez APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: Date: Application Submittal Type: March 17, 2022 Replat Application ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to replat the Harral Subdivision, to establish two (2) lots in order to develop the proposed Lot 2, Block 5 as a Comal ISD elementary school. GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located at the southwest corner of FM 482 and Hubertus Road, directly across Hubertus Road from the existing Comal ISD Danville Middle School. There are three (3) parcels that are included in the replat. The current Harral Lot 2, Block 1 is zoned Manufacturing Light (M -1). Comal Property ID, 104085, to be known as the Harral Lot 1, Block 5 is zoned General Business District (GB). Comal Property ID, 373639, to be known as the Harral Lot 2, Block 5 is zoned General Business District -2 (G132). ACCESS AND CIRCULATION: The property will be providing two (2) full access points onto Hubertus Road. TREE MITIGATION AND PRESERVATION: Per the Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 21.9.9- Tree Preservation and Mitigation, Public schools are exempt from all tree preservation and mitigation requirements. PUBLIC SERVICES: The property will be serviced by the City of Schertz for water and sewer, COMA, AT &T, CPS, NBU, Spectrum, and Center Point Energy. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: All public improvements required for this subdivision are required to be installed prior to recording of the final plat per UDC, Section 21.4.15., unless otherwise specified in an approved development agreement. Water: The property will be serviced by a 12inch water main that will serve both lots. There will also be a water main extension, 500 linear feet, along FM 482. The existing water main located within the Hubertus right -of -way will be relocated outside the roadway pavement and placed in an easement on the property. Sewer: The property will be serviced by a flinch sewer main that will serve both of the lots in the replat, which includes a 2,500 linear foot sewer extension from the corner of Hubertus Road and FM 482 to the south of the plat boundary. Drainage: The applicant is responsible for all drainage associated with the subject property, and for compliance with Stormwater regulations A Stormwater Management Plan has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Sidewalks, Hike and Bike Trails: The property will be constructing a ten -foot (10') wide hike and bike trail adjacent to the property frontage along Hubertus Road. Road Improvements: The subject property is dedicating 1.929 acres of land as right -of -way dedication. There will also be roadway improvements on Hubertus Road consisting of widening and re- striping to create a four lane divided collector road with turn lanes and a striped median. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The replat is consistent with applicable requirements for the property, ordinances, and regulations. It has been reviewed by the Fire, Engineering, Planning and Fire Departments with no objections. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the replat as submitted. Planning Department Recommendation X Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial. * While the Commission can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final approval authority of the proposed replat. In considering final action on a replat, the Commission should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.12.13. Attachments Aerial Map Replat Exhibit O IN r FSO� yc y O l G D, ti BE c<` G L1 Q i 14a to �G �35 \ hr s� SITE ' - °pJ.��\ GUT O, 1., r toZ�[e \ ►I .G 1 SCALE 1" = 3,000' SCALE: 1 "= 1000' ACRES BEARING HARRAL SUBDIVISION �M�g2 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 n Q Q4.00 x L3 W 53.51' COMAL INDEPENDENT N41'09'36 "E SCHOOL DISTRICT L5 of Q78.60 W N29'20'21 "E 07 L8 COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL i _ 2 DOC. NO. 201006024478 O.P.R. L10 DRAINAGE EASEMENT O30' 2 VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. NBU UTILITIES NOTES: 1. MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES, IS SUBJECT TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IT. 2. UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5' WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND SERVICE. 3. UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCE AREA. 4. EACH LOT MUST HAVE ITS OWN WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AT THE OWNER'S /DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. 5. DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS U.E. WITH DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (D.E.) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENTS (U.E.) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES. GENERAL NOTES: 1. NOTICE: SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 2. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, PANEL 48187CO210F, DATED 11/2/2007, IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR/ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 4. THE SUBDIVISION IS WHOLLY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ. 5. THERE ARE TWO (2) BUILDABLE LOTS. FLOODPLAIN VERIFICATION: ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP MAP PANEL: 48091 C0440F, EFFECTIVE DATE 9/2/2009 AND MAP PANEL: 48091 C0505F, EFFECTIVE DATE 9/2/2009 PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT LOCATED WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR LEGEND SCALE: 1 "= 400' THE 3.934 ACRES THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY PLATTED AS LOT 2 BLOCK 1 AND A 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALL OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION. ALL RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374 OF THE MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY. TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN THIS PLAT TO THE MATTERS OF STREETS, LOTS AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, EXCEPT FOR THOSE VARIANCES GRANTED BY THE SAN ANTONIO PLANNING COMMISSION. CARA C.TACKETT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. PROPERTY CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED WITH CAP OR DISK MARKED "PAPE- DAWSON" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00 FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE DISPLAYED IN GRID VALUES DERIVED FROM THE NGS COOPERATIVE COBS NETWORK. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE SURFACE. 4. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00, FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND BY: PAPE- DAWSON ENGINEERS INC. DAVID CASANOVA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 Q3.934 ACRES BEARING HARRAL SUBDIVISION L1 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 10.77' (VOL 15, PG 374, MPR) Q4.00 ACRES L3 BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE 53.51' COMAL INDEPENDENT N41'09'36 "E SCHOOL DISTRICT L5 DOC. NO. 201006020818 O.P.R. Q78.60 ACRES N29'20'21 "E BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE L8 COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL 26.78' DISTRICT S60'39'39 "E DOC. NO. 201006024478 O.P.R. L10 DRAINAGE EASEMENT O30' 2 VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. LINE TABLE LINE # BEARING LENGTH L1 S34'20'21 "W 10.77' L2 N34'20'21 "E 11.55' L3 S4'18'39 "E 53.51' L4 N41'09'36 "E 7.04' L5 S29'20'21 "W 370.06' L6 N29'20'21 "E 352.25' L8 N1 8'58'39 "W 26.78' L9 S60'39'39 "E 20.00' L10 N1 8'58'39 "W 26.78' L11 N29'20'21 "E 388.81' L12 N87'43 30 E 23.49 L13 S29'20'21 "W 418.93' L14 553'48'52 "W 264.69' CENTERPOINT ENERGY NOTE LINE TABLE LINE # BEARING LENGTH L15 N36'11'08 "W 20.00' L16 S1 8'54'24 "E 20.95' L17 N59'40'21 "E 12.00' L18 S59'40'21 "W 12.00' L19 N30'19'01 "W 36.15' L20 S87'43'30 "W 67.89' L21 S29'20'21 "W 30.57' L22 N60'39'39 "W 20.00' L23 N29'20'21 "E 41.75' L24 S30'22'08 "E 48.02' L25 S59'37 52 W 20.28 CURVE TABLE CURVE # RADIUS DELTA CHORD BEARING CHORD LENGTH Cl 1106.30' 5'36'02" S27'52'35 "E 108.10' 108.14' C2 1086.30 5-56'56 S27-50',36"E 112.74 112.79 CENTERPOINT ENERGY, BY AND THROUGH ITS GAS UTILITY SYSTEM, IS HEREBY DEDICATED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT -OF -WAYS FOR GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES IN THE AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT AS "GAS EASEMENT" AND "UTILITY EASEMENT" FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, RECONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, REMOVING, INSPECTING AND PATROLLING SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER GRANTORS ADJACENT LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSING ITS INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. CENTERPOINT ENERGY SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO RELOCATE SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES WITHIN EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AREAS, AND THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID AREA LANDS ALL TREES OR PARTS THEREOF, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH ENDANGER, OR MAY INTERFERE WITH THE EFFICIENCY OF GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. NO BUILDINGS, CONCRETE SLABS, OR WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN EASEMENT AREAS WITHOUT AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY. F M AS2 /r - w1D1H SEE DETAIL "A' ( / (SHEET 3 OF 3) L - / / / SEE DETAIL (SHEET 3 OF ol N -5°c lid 0 - -- %*\ 5 S� S't>/ L4/ Ll0 �L/ / 14 / 15 F� 3 / rn / h / / 3 / / o / / 2 Co tj- 3 / 12 ,M 4.998 ACRES �� / OWNER: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COMAL o INDEPENDENT SCHOOL /Z DISTRICT / DOC. NO. 201006028883 O.P.R. / 0-\ 1 TXDOT NOTES: A) FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SETBACK AND /OR SOUND' ABATEMENT MEASURES FOR FUTURE NOISE MITIGATION. B) OWNER /DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING ANY ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT-OF-WAY.OUTFALLS FOR WATER QUALITY AND /OR DETENTION PONDS TREATING IMPERVIOUS COVER RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURES FOR REDUCTION OF DISCHARGE VELOCITY WILL NOT ENCROACH BY STRUCTURE OR GRADING INTO STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. FOR PROJECTS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE, TRANSITION OR CONTRIBUTING ZONES, PLACEMENT OF PERMANENT STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DEVICES OR VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS WITHIN STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NO NEW EASEMENTS OF ANY TYPE SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. C) MAXIMUM ACCESS POINTS TO STATE HIGHWAY FROM THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REGULATED AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT'S, "ACCESS MANAGEMENT MANUAL ". THE PROPERTY IS ELIGIBLE FOR MAXIMUM COMBINED TOTAL OF ZERO (0) ACCESS POINTS TO FM 482, BASED ON AN OVERALL PLATTED HIGHWAY FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET. WHERE TOPOGRAPHY OR OTHER EXISTING CONDITIONS MAKE IT INAPPROPRIATE OR NOT FEASIBLE TO CONFORM TO THE CONNECTION SPACING INTERVALS, THE LOCATION OF REASONABLE ACCESS WILL BE DETERMINED WITH CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO TOPOGRAPHY, ESTABLISHED PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS, UNIQUE PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS, AND /OR PHYSICAL DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. THE SELECTED LOCATION SHOULD SERVE AS MANY PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS AS POSSIBLE TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECT ACCESS TO THE HIGHWAY. IN SELECTING LOCATIONS FOR FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTIONS, PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO PUBLIC ROADWAYS THAT ARE ON LOCAL THOROUGHFARE PLANS. D) IF SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED BY APPROPRIATE CITY ORDINANCE, A SIDEWALK PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED BY TXDOT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY. LOCATIONS OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT. E) ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURE (LEFT TURN LANE, RIGHT TURN LANE,SIGNAL, ETC.) FOR ANY ACCESS FRONTING A STATE MAINTAINED ROADWAY SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER /OWNER. r X66 • 13 � JZ / 9734ao. r Z j1 CL12 / V6 j '60C. NO. / 200206024546 OPR / 20' UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. NO, 201706035434 OPR \� I 20' UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. NO. 201506003057 OPR 15' WATER EASEMENT DOC. NO1 200206024546 OPRI 20' UTILITY EASEMENT_ DOC NO 201706035434 OPR ACCESS POINT E N VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. E N I I'l ) 79' 20' UTILITY EASEMENT 118' _ 60 58' I W :r N N I M O (v 60 f M M I � 0) I 79' I ACCESS POINT E N VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. E N I I'l ) 79' 20' UTILITY EASEMENT I 2" DOC. NO. 201706035434 OPR� 501.17' 60 S59'3T52 "W 30' VEHICULAR 0) ACCESS POINT N VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. N � LOT 2, E 0) 2 I z LOT 1, 25' BUILDING SETBACK VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.I. O) - BLOCK 5, M (6.623 AC) 15' WATER EASEMENT I M N p VOL. 15, PG. 374 M. R. 2 O Cc C5 i(n 14' GAS, TELEPHONE, ELECTRI I W C) s� AND CABLE TV. EASEM�NT S 0 w VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. m m =Q i iNt 20' UTILITY EASEMENT N �% DOC. NO. 201706035434 I q N II 50' VEHICULAR I ACCESS POINT E N VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. E N I I'l ) 79' 20' UTILITY EASEMENT I 2" DOC. NO. 201706035434 OPR� 501.17' 60 S59'3T52 "W 0) N 3 � LOT 2, E 0) 2 BLOCK 5, z (17.440 AC) E d- - NI KAATrPI IKIF _ CFF CI-IFFT 7 (1F 118' 58' SCALE: 1 "= 100' 100' 200' rziPAPE- DAWSON ENGINEERS SAN ANTONIO AUSTIN HOUSTON FORT WORTH DALLAS I I I I 2000 NW LOOP 410 1 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 1 210.375.9000 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION #470 1 TBPLS FIRM REGISTRATION #10028800 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL �f THE OWNER OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN PERSON OR THR OUG H A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC, EXCEPT AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE OR PART OF AN ENCLAVE OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES, DRAINS, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. OWNER /DEVELOPER: JEFF SMITH, DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1404 IH 35 NORTH, NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78130 830 -221 -2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED JEFF SMITH KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL I, COUNTY CLERK OF COMAL COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE MAP AND PLAT RECORDS, DOC # OF COMAL COUNTY ON THE DAY OF A.D. 20 , AT M. COUNTY CLERK, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS BY: , DEPUTY THIS PLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THIS DAY OF , AD NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. DATED: THIS THE DAY OF , YEAR A.D. 20 BY: CHAIRPERSON BY: SECRETARY CERTIFICATION BY CITY ENGINEER I, THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIRMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CITY ENGINEER , SCHERTZ, TEXAS REPLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 2 BLOCK 1 TO CREATE THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 1 AND 2 BLOCK 5 A 25.992 ACRE TRACT OF LAND ESTABLISHING LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 5, BEING COMPRISED OF 3.719 ACRES OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, 3.441 ACRES, OUT OF A 3.996 ACRE TRACT (CALLED 4.000 ACRES) RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 16.901 ACRES OUT OF THAT 78.60 TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006024478, A 1.929 ACRE RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION, BEING COMPRISED OF 0.214 OF AN ACRE, OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, AND 0.556 OF AN ACRE OUT OF 3.996 ACRES, (CALLED 4.00 ACRES), RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 1.159 ACRES OUT OF A 78.60 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 201006024478, ALL OUT OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, OUT OF THE RAPHAEL GARZA SURVEY NO. 89, ABSTRACT 175 IN THE CITY OF SHEET 1 O F 3 SCHERTZ, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS DATE OF PRINT: March 11, 2022 O IN r -r O ti G VD ��s /S ITE G MPS O �© 17l 1N .,. k` r � OUT IU0167.1we \ ►I .G 1 SCALE 1" = 3,000' INDEX MAP SCALE: 1 "= 1000' STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN THIS PLAT TO THE MATTERS OF STREETS, LOTS AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, EXCEPT FOR THOSE VARIANCES GRANTED BY THE SAN ANTONIO PLANNING COMMISSION. CARA C. TACKETT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. PROPERTY CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED WITH CAP OR DISK MARKED "PAPE- DAWSON" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00 FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE DISPLAYED IN GRID VALUES DERIVED FROM THE NGS COOPERATIVE COBS NETWORK. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE SURFACE. 4. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00, FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND BY: PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS INC. DAVID CASANOVA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 NBU UTILITIES NOTES: 1. MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES IS SUBJECT TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IT. 2. UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5' WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND SERVICE. 3. UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCE AREA. 4. EACH LOT MUST HAVE ITS OWN WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AT THE OWNER'S /DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. 5. DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS (U.E.) WITH DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (D.E.) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENTS (U.E.) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES. SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR LEGEND CENTERPOINT ENERGY NOTE: CENTERPOINT ENERGY BY AND THROUGH ITS GAS UTILITY SYSTEM IS HEREBY DEDICATED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT -OF -WAYS FOR GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES IN THE AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT AS "GAS EASEMENT" AND "UTILITY EASEMENT" FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, RECONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, REMOVING, INSPECTING AND PATROLLING SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER GRANTORS ADJACENT LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSING ITS INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. CENTERPOINT ENERGY SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO RELOCATE SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES WITHIN EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AREAS, AND THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID AREA LANDS ALL TREES OR PARTS THEREOF, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH ENDANGER, OR MAY INTERFERE WITH THE EFFICIENCY OF GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. NO BUILDINGS, CONCRETE SLABS, OR WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN EASEMENT AREAS WITHOUT AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY. GENERAL NOTES: 1. NOTICE: SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 2. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL 48187CO210F DATED 11/2/2007 IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR/ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 4. THE SUBDIVISION IS WHOLLY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ. 5. THERE ARE TWO (2) BUILDABLE LOTS. MATCHLINE - SEE SHEET 1 OF 3 1 / � 4.998 ACRES OWNER: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 7 DOC. NO. 201006028883 O.P.R. 1 / � REMAINING PORTION OF 78.60 ACRES / / Fj OWNER: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DOC. NO. 201006024478 O.P.R. 11 w ° 13 / 0 / / 2 / 3 / „N / r'2 / 14 L14 L L16 270.91' LOT 2, BLOCK 5, (17.440 AC) 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. NO. 201006024480 O.P.R TXDOT NOTES: A) FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SETBACK AND /OR SOUND ABATEMENT MEASURES FOR FUTURE NOISE MITIGATION. B) OWNER /DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING ANY ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT- OF- WAY.OUTFALLS FOR WATER QUALITY AND /OR DETENTION PONDS TREATING IMPERVIOUS COVER RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURES FOR REDUCTION OF DISCHARGE VELOCITY WILL NOT ENCROACH BY STRUCTURE OR GRADING INTO STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. FOR PROJECTS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE, TRANSITION OR CONTRIBUTING ZONES, PLACEMENT OF PERMANENT STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DEVICES OR VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS WITHIN STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NO NEW EASEMENTS OF ANY TYPE SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. C) MAXIMUM ACCESS POINTS TO STATE HIGHWAY FROM THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REGULATED AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT'S, "ACCESS MANAGEMENT MANUAL ". THE PROPERTY IS ELIGIBLE FOR MAXIMUM COMBINED TOTAL OF ZERO (0) ACCESS POINTS TO FM 482, BASED ON AN OVERALL PLATTED HIGHWAY FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET. WHERE TOPOGRAPHY OR OTHER EXISTING CONDITIONS MAKE IT INAPPROPRIATE OR NOT FEASIBLE TO CONFORM TO THE CONNECTION SPACING INTERVALS, THE LOCATION OF REASONABLE ACCESS WILL BE DETERMINED WITH CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO TOPOGRAPHY, ESTABLISHED PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS, UNIQUE PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS, AND /OR PHYSICAL DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. THE SELECTED LOCATION SHOULD SERVE AS MANY PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS AS POSSIBLE TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECT ACCESS TO THE HIGHWAY. IN SELECTING LOCATIONS FOR FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTIONS, PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO PUBLIC ROADWAYS THAT ARE ON LOCAL THOROUGHFARE PLANS. D) IF SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED BY APPROPRIATE CITY ORDINANCE, A SIDEWALK PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED BY TXDOT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY. LOCATIONS OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT. E) ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURE (LEFT TURN LANE, RIGHT TURN LANE,SIGNAL, ETC.) FOR ANY ACCESS FRONTING A STATE MAINTAINED ROADWAY SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER /OWNER. rn M NI r M 0) 2 rrn 6 z� w Co d' N O M -1_17 (n 39' 21' 18' L18 3 QI o O Df CC U) o _ H CL w w m M Q = Q — 750.82'- — __ S53'48'S4"W 771.21' - -- _ -- -- - -- 1 — 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ' 15' BUILDING � / r DOC. NO. 201006024479 O.P.R D. I.R. (4777) SETBACK DOC. N0. / 30' RECIPROCA EASEMENT 200606019416 O.P.R. VARIABLE WIDTH "MAIN DRIVEWAYS" 15' BUILDING SETBACK / DRAINAGE EASEMENT I DOC. NO. 200706030707 O.P.R / DOC. NO. 200606019416 O.P.R. / DOC. N0. AMENDED IN / / 201506004791 O.P.R. ) DOC. N0. 201006024119 O.P.R. / 20' PUBLIC _ — _/ UTILITY EASEMENT 3.497 ACRES / / REMAINING OFA7.187 ACRES ION 201006024479 O.P.R. OWNER: BIG DIAMOND, LLC BIG DIAMOND, LLC DOC. N0. 201606031677 O.P.R. / / DOC. NO. 201406031056, O.P.R. 85' SCALE: 1 = 100 /01 100 200 300 PAPE- DAWSON ENGINEERS SAN ANTONIO I AUSTIN I HOUSTON I FORT WORTH I DALLAS 2000 NW LOOP 410 1 SAN ANTONIO TX 78213 1 210.375.9000 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION #470 1 TBPLS FIRM REGISTRATION #10028800 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL THE OWNER OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN PERSON OR THR OUG H A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT DEDICATES TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC EXCEPT AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE OR PART OF AN ENCLAVE OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES, DRAINS, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. OWNER /DEVELOPER: JEFF SMITH, DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1404 IH 35 NORTH, NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78130 830 -221 -2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED JEFF SMITH KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL I, COUNTY CLERK OF COMAL COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE MAP AND PLAT RECORDS, DOC # OF COMAL COUNTY ON THE DAY OF A.D. 20 , AT M. COUNTY CLERK, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS BY: , DEPUTY THIS PLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THIS DAY OF , AD NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. DATED: THIS THE DAY OF , YEAR A.D. 20 BY: CHAIRPERSON BY: SECRETARY CERTIFICATION BY CITY ENGINEER I, THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIRMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CITY ENGINEER , SCHERTZ, TEXAS REPLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 2 BLOCK 1 TO CREATE THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 1 AND 2 BLOCK 5 A 25.992 ACRE TRACT OF LAND ESTABLISHING LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 5, BEING COMPRISED OF 3.719 ACRES OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, 3.441 ACRES, OUT OF A 3.996 ACRE TRACT (CALLED 4.000 ACRES) RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 16.901 ACRES OUT OF THAT 78.60 TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006024478, A 1.929 ACRE RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION, BEING COMPRISED OF 0.214 OF AN ACRE, OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, AND 0.556 OF AN ACRE OUT OF 3.996 ACRES, (CALLED 4.00 ACRES), RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 1.159 ACRES OUT OF A 78.60 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 201006024478, ALL OUT OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, OUT OF THE RAPHAEL GARZA SURVEY NO. 89, ABSTRACT 175 IN THE CITY OF SHEET 2 OF 3 SCHERTZ, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS DATE OF PRINT: March 11, 2022 78' 60' 18' ' 7 N Co M DI 1/4 I.R. ' U — 750.82'- — __ S53'48'S4"W 771.21' - -- _ -- -- - -- 1 — 10' PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT ' 15' BUILDING � / r DOC. NO. 201006024479 O.P.R D. I.R. (4777) SETBACK DOC. N0. / 30' RECIPROCA EASEMENT 200606019416 O.P.R. VARIABLE WIDTH "MAIN DRIVEWAYS" 15' BUILDING SETBACK / DRAINAGE EASEMENT I DOC. NO. 200706030707 O.P.R / DOC. NO. 200606019416 O.P.R. / DOC. N0. AMENDED IN / / 201506004791 O.P.R. ) DOC. N0. 201006024119 O.P.R. / 20' PUBLIC _ — _/ UTILITY EASEMENT 3.497 ACRES / / REMAINING OFA7.187 ACRES ION 201006024479 O.P.R. OWNER: BIG DIAMOND, LLC BIG DIAMOND, LLC DOC. N0. 201606031677 O.P.R. / / DOC. NO. 201406031056, O.P.R. 85' SCALE: 1 = 100 /01 100 200 300 PAPE- DAWSON ENGINEERS SAN ANTONIO I AUSTIN I HOUSTON I FORT WORTH I DALLAS 2000 NW LOOP 410 1 SAN ANTONIO TX 78213 1 210.375.9000 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION #470 1 TBPLS FIRM REGISTRATION #10028800 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL THE OWNER OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN PERSON OR THR OUG H A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT DEDICATES TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC EXCEPT AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE OR PART OF AN ENCLAVE OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES, DRAINS, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. OWNER /DEVELOPER: JEFF SMITH, DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1404 IH 35 NORTH, NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78130 830 -221 -2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED JEFF SMITH KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL I, COUNTY CLERK OF COMAL COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE MAP AND PLAT RECORDS, DOC # OF COMAL COUNTY ON THE DAY OF A.D. 20 , AT M. COUNTY CLERK, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS BY: , DEPUTY THIS PLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THIS DAY OF , AD NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. DATED: THIS THE DAY OF , YEAR A.D. 20 BY: CHAIRPERSON BY: SECRETARY CERTIFICATION BY CITY ENGINEER I, THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIRMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CITY ENGINEER , SCHERTZ, TEXAS REPLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 2 BLOCK 1 TO CREATE THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 1 AND 2 BLOCK 5 A 25.992 ACRE TRACT OF LAND ESTABLISHING LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 5, BEING COMPRISED OF 3.719 ACRES OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, 3.441 ACRES, OUT OF A 3.996 ACRE TRACT (CALLED 4.000 ACRES) RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 16.901 ACRES OUT OF THAT 78.60 TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006024478, A 1.929 ACRE RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION, BEING COMPRISED OF 0.214 OF AN ACRE, OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, AND 0.556 OF AN ACRE OUT OF 3.996 ACRES, (CALLED 4.00 ACRES), RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 1.159 ACRES OUT OF A 78.60 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 201006024478, ALL OUT OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, OUT OF THE RAPHAEL GARZA SURVEY NO. 89, ABSTRACT 175 IN THE CITY OF SHEET 2 OF 3 SCHERTZ, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS DATE OF PRINT: March 11, 2022 O IN r -r O ti G ��s S ITE O G �© �l \ r 1N .,. k` r � OUT IuoZ�[e \ ►I .G 1 SCALE 1" = 3,000' NBU UTILITIES NOTES: 1. MAINTENANCE OF DEDICATED UTILITY EASEMENTS IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PROPERTY OWNER. ANY USE OF AN EASEMENT, OR ANY PORTION OF IT, INCLUDING LANDSCAPING OR DRAINAGE FEATURES IS SUBJECT TO AND SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THE EASEMENT, MUST NOT ENDANGER OR INTERFERE WITH THE RIGHTS GRANTED BY THE EASEMENT TO NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, AND SHALL BE SUBJECT TO APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY OF NEW BRAUNFELS OR ANY OTHER GOVERNING BODY. THE PROPERTY OWNER MUST OBTAIN, IN ADVANCE, WRITTEN AGREEMENT WITH THE UTILITIES TO UTILIZE THE EASEMENT, OR ANY PART OF IT. 2. UTILITIES WILL POSSESS A 5' WIDE SERVICE EASEMENT TO THE DWELLING ALONG THE SERVICE LINE TO THE SERVICE ENTRANCE. THIS EASEMENT WILL VARY DEPENDING UPON LOCATION OF DWELLING AND SERVICE. 3. UTILITIES SHALL HAVE ACCESS TO THE METER LOCATIONS FROM THE FRONT YARD AND METER LOCATIONS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED WITHIN A FENCE AREA. 4. EACH LOT MUST HAVE ITS OWN WATER AND SEWER SERVICE AT THE OWNER'S /DEVELOPER'S EXPENSE. 5. DO NOT COMBINE ANY NEW UTILITY EASEMENTS (U.E.) WITH DRAINAGE EASEMENTS (D.E.) OR MAKE CHANGES IN GRADE WITHIN THE UTILITY EASEMENTS (U.E.) WITHOUT WRITTEN APPROVAL FROM NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES. 11 INDEX MAP Q 3.934 ACRES 20' WATER EASEMENT SCALE: 1 "= 1000' HARRAL SUBDIVISION O DOC. NO. 201806006944 OPR 1 2 45' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LEGEND LOT 2 BLOCK 1 VOL VOLUME OPR OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS ® FOUND TxDOT PG PAGE(S) (OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS (VOL 15, PG 374, MPR) O MONUMENTATION MPR MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF OF REAL PROPERTY) OF 4.00 ACRES STREET CENTERLINE 14 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE O FOUND 1/2" IRON ROD DR DEED RECORDS OF SET 1/2" IRON ROD (PD) COMAL INDEPENDENT (UNLESS NOTED 15 COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS C SET 112" IRON ROD (PD) -ROW SCHOOL DISTRICT OTHERWISE) 11 20' UTILITY EASEMENT Q 3.934 ACRES 20' WATER EASEMENT HARRAL SUBDIVISION O DOC. NO. 201806006944 OPR 1 2 45' DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOT 2 BLOCK 1 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT 13 VARIABLE WIDTH RIGHT OF (VOL 15, PG 374, MPR) O VOL. 15, PG. 374 M.P.R. WAY DEDICATION (1.929 AC) Q 4.00 ACRES 20' SANITARY SEWER 14 20' SANITARY SEWER BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE O EASEMENT DOC. NO COMAL INDEPENDENT 15 20' WATERLINE EASEMENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DOC. NO. 201006020818 O.P.R. Q78.60 ACRES BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT DOC. NO. 201006024478 O.P.R. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT PROPER ENGINEERING CONSIDERATION HAS BEEN GIVEN THIS PLAT TO THE MATTERS OF STREETS, LOTS AND DRAINAGE LAYOUT. TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE THIS PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE, EXCEPT FOR THOSE VARIANCES GRANTED BY THE SAN ANTONIO PLANNING COMMISSION. CARA C. TACKETT LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 SURVEYOR'S NOTES: 1. PROPERTY CORNERS ARE MONUMENTED WITH CAP OR DISK MARKED "PAPE- DAWSON" UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 2. COORDINATES SHOWN ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00 FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE DISPLAYED IN GRID VALUES DERIVED FROM THE NGS COOPERATIVE COBS NETWORK. 3. DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE SURFACE. 4. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE NORTH AMERICAN DATUM OF 1983 NAD83 (NA2011) EPOCH 2010.00, FROM THE TEXAS COORDINATE SYSTEM ESTABLISHED FOR THE SOUTH CENTRAL ZONE. STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF BEXAR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE PLAT CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE TEXAS BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS AND LAND SURVEYORS ACCORDING TO AN ACTUAL SURVEY MADE ON THE GROUND BY: PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS INC. DAVID CASANOVA REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PAPE - DAWSON ENGINEERS, INC. 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 78213 CENTERPOINT ENERGY NOTE: CENTERPOINT ENERGY BY AND THROUGH ITS GAS UTILITY SYSTEM IS HEREBY DEDICATED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT -OF -WAYS FOR GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES IN THE AREAS DESIGNATED ON THIS PLAT AS "GAS EASEMENT" AND "UTILITY EASEMENT" FOR THE PURPOSE OF INSTALLING, CONSTRUCTING, RECONSTRUCTING, MAINTAINING, REMOVING, INSPECTING AND PATROLLING SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER GRANTORS ADJACENT LAND FOR THE PURPOSE OF ACCESSING ITS INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. CENTERPOINT ENERGY SHALL ALSO HAVE THE RIGHT TO RELOCATE SAID INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES WITHIN EASEMENT AND RIGHT -OF -WAY AREAS, AND THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID AREA LANDS ALL TREES OR PARTS THEREOF, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH ENDANGER, OR MAY INTERFERE WITH THE EFFICIENCY OF GAS DISTRIBUTION INFRASTRUCTURE AND SERVICE FACILITIES. NO BUILDINGS, CONCRETE SLABS, OR WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN EASEMENT AREAS WITHOUT AND ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT WITH CENTERPOINT ENERGY. GENERAL NOTES: 1. NOTICE: SELLING A PORTION OF THIS ADDITION BY METES AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 2. ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL 48187CO210F DATED 11/2/2007 IS LOCATED IN ZONE X AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 -YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 3. ALL OPEN SPACE, COMMON AREAS, GREENBELTS, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF OWNER OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR/ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR OR ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY THE CITY. 4. THE SUBDIVISION IS WHOLLY WITHIN THE CITY LIMITS OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ. 5. THERE ARE TWO (2) BUILDABLE LOTS. FM482 13 15 / 12 / LOT 1 BLOCK 5 3 1 , DETAIL "A" SCALE 1" = 50' TVfInT KI/-,TCC- A) FOR RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT DIRECTLY ADJACENT TO STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY, THE DEVELOPER SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ADEQUATE SETBACK AND /OR SOUND ABATEMENT MEASURES FOR FUTURE NOISE MITIGATION. B) OWNER /DEVELOPER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR PREVENTING ANY ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM WITHIN THE HIGHWAY RIGHT- OF- WAY.OUTFALLS FOR WATER QUALITY AND /OR DETENTION PONDS TREATING IMPERVIOUS COVER RELATED TO THE DEVELOPMENT AND STRUCTURES FOR REDUCTION OF DISCHARGE VELOCITY WILL NOT ENCROACH BY STRUCTURE OR GRADING INTO STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. FOR PROJECTS IN THE EDWARDS AQUIFER RECHARGE, TRANSITION OR CONTRIBUTING ZONES, PLACEMENT OF PERMANENT STRUCTURAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICE DEVICES OR VEGETATIVE FILTER STRIPS WITHIN STATE ROW OR INTO AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. NO NEW EASEMENTS OF ANY TYPE SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AREAS OF ROW RESERVATION OR DEDICATION. C) MAXIMUM ACCESS POINTS TO STATE HIGHWAY FROM THIS PROPERTY WILL BE REGULATED AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT'S, "ACCESS MANAGEMENT MANUAL ". THE PROPERTY IS ELIGIBLE FOR MAXIMUM COMBINED TOTAL OF ZERO (0) ACCESS POINTS TO FM 482, BASED ON AN OVERALL PLATTED HIGHWAY FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 490 FEET. WHERE TOPOGRAPHY OR OTHER EXISTING CONDITIONS MAKE IT INAPPROPRIATE OR NOT FEASIBLE TO CONFORM TO THE CONNECTION SPACING INTERVALS, THE LOCATION OF REASONABLE ACCESS WILL BE DETERMINED WITH CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO TOPOGRAPHY, ESTABLISHED PROPERTY OWNERSHIPS, UNIQUE PHYSICAL LIMITATIONS, AND /OR PHYSICAL DESIGN CONSTRAINTS. THE SELECTED LOCATION SHOULD SERVE AS MANY PROPERTIES AND INTERESTS AS POSSIBLE TO REDUCE THE NEED FOR ADDITIONAL DIRECT ACCESS TO THE HIGHWAY. IN SELECTING LOCATIONS FOR FULL MOVEMENT INTERSECTIONS, PREFERENCE WILL BE GIVEN TO PUBLIC ROADWAYS THAT ARE ON LOCAL THOROUGHFARE PLANS. D) IF SIDEWALKS ARE REQUIRED BY APPROPRIATE CITY ORDINANCE, A SIDEWALK PERMIT MUST BE APPROVED BY TXDOT, PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY. LOCATIONS OF SIDEWALKS WITHIN STATE RIGHT -OF -WAY SHALL BE AS DIRECTED BY TXDOT. E) ANY TRAFFIC CONTROL MEASURE (LEFT TURN LANE, RIGHT TURN LANE,SIGNAL, ETC.) FOR ANY ACCESS FRONTING A STATE MAINTAINED ROADWAY SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE DEVELOPER /OWNER. �/ 14 15 N87'43'30 11 E 91.34' / 11 1 LOT 1 BLOCK 5 DETAIL "B" SCALE 1 " = 50' 20' UTILITY EASEMENT DOC. NO. 201506003057 OPR 15' WATER EASEMENT DOC. NO.200206024546 OPR 20' TILITY EASEMENT OC NO. 201706035434 OPR SCALE: 1 ff = 100' /01 100 200 300 PAPE- DAWSON ENGINEERS SAN ANTONIO I AUSTIN I HOUSTON I FORT WORTH I DALLAS 2000 NW LOOP 410 1 SAN ANTONIO TX 78213 1 210.375.9000 TBPE FIRM REGISTRATION #470 1 TBPLS FIRM REGISTRATION #10028800 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL THE OWNER OF LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT IN PERSON OR THR OUG H A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT DEDICATES TO THE USE OF THE PUBLIC EXCEPT AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE OR PART OF AN ENCLAVE OR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES, DRAINS, EASEMENTS AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN EXPRESSED. OWNER /DEVELOPER: JEFF SMITH, DIRECTOR OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANNING COMAL INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 1404 IH 35 NORTH, NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78130 830 -221 -2000 STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL BEFORE ME, THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED JEFF SMITH KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGED TO ME THAT HE EXECUTED THE SAME FOR THE PURPOSES AND CONSIDERATIONS THEREIN EXPRESSED AND IN THE CAPACITY THEREIN STATED. GIVEN UNDER MY HAND AND SEAL OF OFFICE THIS DAY OF , A.D. 20 NOTARY PUBLIC, BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS COUNTY OF COMAL I, COUNTY CLERK OF COMAL COUNTY, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE FOREGOING INSTRUMENT WAS FILED FOR RECORD IN THE MAP AND PLAT RECORDS, DOC # OF COMAL COUNTY ON THE DAY OF A.D. 20 , AT M. COUNTY CLERK, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS BY: , DEPUTY THIS PLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED AND APPROVED BY NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES ON THIS DAY OF , AD NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (C.C.M.A.) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT THE TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION AGENT FOR CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF HARRAL SUBDIVISION REPLAT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED BY THE CITY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AND IS HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. DATED: THIS THE DAY OF , YEAR A.D. 20 BY: CHAIRPERSON BY: SECRETARY CERTIFICATION BY CITY ENGINEER I, THE UNDERSIGNED ENGINEER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIRMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATION AND THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. CITY ENGINEER , SCHERTZ, TEXAS REPLAT OF THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 2 BLOCK 1 TO CREATE THE HARRAL SUBDIVISION LOT 1 AND 2 BLOCK 5 A 25.992 ACRE TRACT OF LAND ESTABLISHING LOT 1 AND LOT 2, BLOCK 5, BEING COMPRISED OF 3.719 ACRES OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, 3.441 ACRES, OUT OF A 3.996 ACRE TRACT (CALLED 4.000 ACRES) RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 16.901 ACRES OUT OF THAT 78.60 TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006024478, A 1.929 ACRE RIGHT -OF -WAY DEDICATION, BEING COMPRISED OF 0.214 OF AN ACRE, OUT OF LOT 2, BLOCK 1, HARRAL SUBDIVISION, RECORDED IN VOLUME 15, PAGE 374, MAP AND PLAT RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, AND 0.556 OF AN ACRE OUT OF 3.996 ACRES, (CALLED 4.00 ACRES), RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NUMBER 201006020818, AND 1.159 ACRES OUT OF A 78.60 ACRE TRACT RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 201006024478, ALL OUT OF THE OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS, OUT OF THE RAPHAEL GARZA SURVEY NO. 89, ABSTRACT 175 IN THE CITY OF SHEET 3 O F 3 SCHERTZ, COMAL COUNTY, TEXAS DATE OF PRINT: March 11, 2022 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: WA2022 -001 SUBJECT: WA2022 -001 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver request in relation to on -site sewage facilities for the replat of Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land generally located 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Guadalupe County, Texas. GENERAL, INFORMATION: Owner: Michael J. Moore Engineer: Trevor Tast, TX2 Engineering ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replat the subject property, Lot I of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land, to establish four (4) single - family residential lots. The applicant is seeking approval of a waiver to UDC, Sec 21.15.3.A Wastewater Connection and 21.15.2.1) Extensions of lines. GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road. The property is located approximately 4,500 feet south of the Parklands Subdivision. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The applicant is seeking approval of the waivers to install privately owned On -Site Sewage Facilities (OSSF) on the subject property proposed with the replat. In accordance with UDC, Article 15 Easements and Utilities, 21.15.3.A Wastewater connection required; 21.15.2.1) Extension of lines lots are required to connect to sanitary sewer and extend the sewer lines across the frontage of the property. All lots within a subdivision shall be provided with a connection to an approved public wastewater system unless otherwise approved by the City. Furthermore, the UDC, Article 12 Subdivisions 21.12.2.D. requires that all land subdivided or platted shall comply in full, with the requirements of the UDC. Based on the requirements of the UDC not connecting to a public wastewater system and installation of OSSF requires a waiver to be granted by the Planning and Zoning Commission as prescribed in Sec. 21.12.15 Waivers. The UDC authorizes the Planning and Zoning Commission to grant waivers to the provisions in Article 12 when undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The applicant is requesting a waiver to the required connection to a public wastewater system to allow a privately owned on -site sewage facility. The waiver request for the on -site sewage facility is due to the distance to the nearest connection point being 2,800 feet away. The Engineering Department in reviewing this waiver request, provided that the Department is in support of granting the waiver and notes that it is consistent with similar waivers granted. Additionally, Engineering stated that they verified that the purposed replat associated with this waiver request is laid -out in a manner to provide for future connection of a public sanitary sewer system in the future. Once public infrastructure has been extended to the area to provide sanitary sewer service, the subdivision will be required to connect to the sewer system, in accordance with Section 90 -78 of the Code of Ordinances. Additionally, granting this waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare or be injurious to others properties in the area. If approved, any OSSF proposed for the site will be reviewed and permitted through Guadalupe County. Based on the Engineering Departments review, staff is recommending approval of the waiver COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: Sec. 21.12.15. - Waivers. A.General. The Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize waivers from the provisions of this Article when, in its opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a waiver, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems necessary or desirable to the public interest. In making their findings, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved and existing uses of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, and the probable effect of such waivers upon traffic conditions and upon the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare in the vicinity. Waivers shall not be granted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1.That the granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area; and 2.That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this UDC. Such findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission, together with the specified facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which such waiver is granted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDC so that the public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and justice done. B.The Planning and Zoning Commission may establish a time period for execution of each granted waiver. C. Such findings together with the specific facts on which such findings are based shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which such exception is granted. D.Planning and zoning commission shall not authorize a waiver that would constitute a violation of a valid law, ordinance, code or regulation of the City. E.Any decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding waivers to the provisions of this Article may be appealed to the City Council. When considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards as the Planning and Zoning Commission as outlined above. Attachments Aerial Map Waiver Request Engineering Memo Replat Exhibit 114 North Austin Street Seguin, Texas 78155 Phone (830) 372 -1001 Fax (830) 379 -1155 License Number 10042400 City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Re: Rockin S' Subdivision Waiver To Whom It May Concern: A waiver is being requested for the requirement to connect to existing sanitary sewer. The nearest manhole location is in the cul -de -sac of Forest Oak and Pecos Point, Cypress Point Subdivision. Approximately 2640 feet northwest of the proposed replat. To extend the sewer line approximately 2600 L.F. would cost the landowner well over $200,000.00 based on gathered information for construction cost. This does not include cost for the possibility of a lift station nor factor in the cost for acquisitions of easements over private lands. Currently the homes that are on the property are being served by an on -site sewage facility (OSSF), lots 3 & 5. The lots being created are over the minimum lot area for residential subdivision of Y2 acre as per requirements under Sect; 21.15.3: Wastewater Systems City of Schertz Code of Ordinances. Respectfully, Gloria Kinz DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Megan Harrison, Planner From: Jennifer Shortess, P.E., Engineer Date: February 10, 2022 Re: Recommendation for Waiver to Requirement to Extend Public Sanitary Sewer to Serve the Proposed Rockin'S Subdivision The property owner of the proposed Rockin'S Subdivision (on Green Valley Road, approximately 1.4 miles south of 1 -35) has requested a waiver concerning sanitary sewer requirements contained in the Unified Development Code (UDC). A summary of the waivers and Staff recommendations for each are as follows. Section 21.15.3.A of the UDC requires all lots in a proposed subdivision to be provided with a connection to a public sanitary sewer system. The closest sanitary sewer system connection point for this subdivision is approximately 2,800 feet away. Based on the distance away from the property, Staff has determined that the request to not connect is reasonable and consistent with other sewer connection waiver requests previously approved. Section 21.15.2.1) of the UDC requires the extension of wastewater lines along the entire frontage of a subdivision. Because the closest facility is excessively faraway from this subdivision, Staff has determined that the request to not extend the sanitary sewer is also consistent with other requests previously approved. Therefore, Staff supports the applicant's request to not comply at the time of platting with the UDC requirements to extend the sanitary sewer nor provide a sanitary sewer connection to the proposed subdivision. Staff has verified that the proposed platting is laid -out in a manner to provide for future connection to a public sanitary sewer system. Once public infrastructure has been extended to the area to provide sanitary sewer service, the subdivision will be required to connect to the sewer system, in accordance with Section 90 -78 of the Code of Ordinances. Any new OSSF needed to serve the proposed lot in the proposed Plat will be reviewed and permitted through Guadalupe County. A building permit will not be issued without either a Guadalupe County OSSF approved permit or extension of and connection to the public system. Lo z c) LI) c c c C4 < < r- w 0 00 00 Ld U) (L LOCATION MAP. (N.T.S.) GENERAL NOTES.. 1. BASIS OF BEARING IS THE SOUTHEASfUNE OF THE 12.356 'ACRE TRACT AS. FOUND.MONUYENTED ON THE,rROUND. 2; . A I ILL SETRINS AREA �24 biAMEtER RtBAR WITH. AN' ORANGE PLASTIC CAP.STAMPb ."TRI.-COUNTY".., 3.� Ac I CORDING YO* FLO ODINSURANCt RATE MAP, 4646CO2�13F, DATED NOVEMBER 2., 2007, IS LOCAitb IN X AND, IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 4. IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN. .6. ELEVATIONS ARE NAVD88. 6. ALL OPEN. SPACE, COMMON AREAS_ GREENBEus, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER.OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR .9R ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY. THE CITY. T*NOTICE: SELLING A PORTIO N OF . THIS ADDITION BY METES.AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 8. SURVEY DATE: AUGUST 10, 2021 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDABLE LOTS 4 10. ENGINEERING BY:. TX2 ENGINEERING: F-20787 .1659 STATE HIGHWAY 46, STE 115-438 NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78132 TREVOR TAST, P.E. �11. WAVER REQUESTED: FOR THE REQUIREMENT TO CONNECT TO, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. A WAVER TO FORGO IMMEDIATE CONNECTION TO A.PUBLIC WASTEWATER SYSTEM AT TIME OF PLATTING (REGUIREMENT IN UDC SEC. 21.15.3) IS , REQUIRED FOR A PLAT TO MEET CITY'S suobIVISION REQUIREMENTS. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS, BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BYTHE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (CCMA) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. AGENT FOR CIBOLo CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF ROCK- ITS 3. 4. 5. AND 6. BLOCK 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED 13Y THE PLANNING'& ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. BY CHAIRMAN BY SECRETARY G VEC NOTES. 1. ALL G.V.E.C. EASEMENTS ARE ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICA11ON EASEMENTS. 2. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A 15- G.V.E.C. EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE, FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY UNES. 3. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A FLOATING 10' WIDE. BY 40' LONG GUY WRE EASEMENT TO BE LOCATED BY G.V.E.C. 4. ALL EXISTING G;V.E.0 0 . VERHEAD UNES POSSESS A 30' CENTEkUNE EASEMENT, 15' EACH SIDE OF UNE. 5. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER OBSTIRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND. UTIUlnES. 6. WHERE UNDERGROUND SERVICES ARE UTILIZED, G.V.E b. WILL POSSESS A 5 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT TO THE SERVICE METER 1_06ZION. EASEMENT TO FOLLOW SERVICE LINE AND WILL VARY DEPENDING ON LOCATION OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. THIS REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION HAS 13EEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED, 13Y GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC, COOP. FOR EASEMENTS. 'RT-MR G.V.E.C. GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL rPL-7 UTILITY DISTRICT CEiRiTIFICAll-Li THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, IN PERSON OR THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT. OF MARION, TEXAS, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT NTH THE RIGHT TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, INSTALL I AND LAY OVER AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS MARKED AS 'WATERLINE EASEMENT' AND IN ALL STREETS AND BYWAYS, SUCH PIPELINES, SERVICE LINES, WATER METERS AND OTHER WATER SYSTEM APPURTENANCES AS IT REQUIRES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID LANDS ALL TREESP SHRUBS, GRASSES, PAVEMENTS, FENCES STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH MAY INTERFERE WITH THE FACILITY OR THE,ACCESS THERETO. IT IS AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT NO BUILDING, CONCRETE SLAB ON WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT AREAS. NO OTHER UTILITY LINES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN 36- PARALLEL TO WATER LINES. ANY MONETARY LOSS TO GREEN VALLEY SUD RESULTING FROM MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT, LOCATED WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS DUE TO GRADE CHANGE OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS DEEMED RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID GRADE CHANGES OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS. UPON ENTERING IN AND UPON SAID EASEMENT, THE DISTRICT WILL ENDEAVOR TO RESTORE THE LAND SURFACE TO A LIKABLE CONDITION BUT IS NOT OBLIGATED TO RESTORE IT TO A PRE"EXISTING CONDITION. DATED THIS___��DAY OF 2022, A.D. PAT ALLEN/ GENERAL MANAGER: GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT 1. THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE.CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, HEREBY CERT`IFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT.CONFORMS TO ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. OWNER MICHAEL J. MOORE 77,30 GREEN VALLEY RD. MARION; TEXAS 78i24 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE OWNER,OF.THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. AND IN PERSON FOR THROUGH A DULY AUTHROIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE PUBLIC, AREA IDENTIFIED AS,PRIVATE, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES DRAINS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE.PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN, EXPRESSED. MICHAEL J. MOORE STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY. OF GUADALUPE: BEFORE ME,,THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL J. MOORE KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON. WHOSE NAME.-IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE'FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGE. -TO ME THAT T . HEY EXECUTED THE SA . M . E FO R THE PU RPOSE I S . AND C , ONSIDERATION S THE REIN . SSE . D . AN D I : N THE I CAPACIT I Y THERE IN STATED. I GIVEN *UNDER MY,HANDAND SEAL 0 F OFFIdE ,ON TH IS DAY OF. 20 1 22-7 A, KINZ NOTARY PUBLIC TATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF GUAbALUPE:' 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, AUBREY C, HOLLAND, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF. TEXAS, INDICATE. TO THE BEST OF my KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, 'THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND WAS, PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY MADE ON THE GROUND, UNDER MY SUPERVISION. — i D REGkTER611"HU� L'SMIUINAL L ku 114 N aUSTIN . STREET < SEGUIN, TEXAS, 78155 I 830�372-1001 REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIWSION LOT 1 SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING R.00KIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3,4,5, & 6 BLOCK 1 SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE L08 SANTOS COY SUR I VEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, GUADALLIPE.COUNW, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDi\ASION, PLAT. RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185,-PLATRECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. DATED THIS AY OF A.D., 2022., CITY ENGINEER JOB NO. 190,6103P2 SHEET 1 OF 21, = 0 FND 15' PIN U _ O O Zap O � O Nn I I N O X M r7 O 00 oZmin Z° W OL j( Q .`- N d AREA BEING REPLATTED BEING LOT 1 ROCKING S SUBDIVISION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS, GUADALUPE COUNTY. TEXAS. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. IN FND W PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. ly1 LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " oIQ Z O Z7 N C1J O O N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I O PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO p BARBARA A. WRIGHT, ET AL �>_ 23.625 Ac. b 278011043 ' ' - 127.92 I O SET PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. PIN LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m I 599.20' FND Vi' PIN - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY 10' ROADWAY S.U.D. EASEMENT ---- -- II/ DEDICATION J N Ut 0.118 Ac. O 1.00 �C. S"I V NON- ACCESS LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF � SE T 3 ► N C1J SET N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I P PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO 15_G.V.EC_ EASEMENT --- ___J -- m < '�• 11tIV - - -- A- 13315'23' I IR - 55.00' ' ' - 127.92 I O :0 'L i 1 .OT CJ 718 A � - 149'00'26' R - 25.00' �_ j1 Q U I� J L T - 90.17' , L - 65.02 1 5 W � O I 24' CROSS — I ACCESS EASEMENT L - - , 'J - I-1 1' NON- ACCESS - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY fi S.U.D. EASEMENT Ut O .P, I " 10' ROADWAY DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF _- -____t SET Vi PIN GO O cn UO FND 14' PIN REPLAT OF ROCKIN S S UBDI VISION LOT 1 LEGEND SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING CM = CONTROLUNG MONUMENT ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3, 4, 5, & 6 BLOCK 1 — U — - OVERHEAD UTILITY CTL - UTIUTY POLE SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE LOS SANTOS COY SURVEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, - GUY WIRE GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION, PLAT FND - FOUND RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. JOB NO. 1906103P2 SHEET 2 OF 2 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: WA2022 -002 SUBJECT: WA2022 -002 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a waiver regarding Rough Proportionality in relation to the construction of the street improvements adjacent to the proposed replat of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land generally located 1,200 feet southwest from the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, Guadalupe County. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Michael Moore Authorized Agent: Tri- County Surveying Inc., Gloria Kinz ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is proposing to replat the subject property, Lot I of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land, into four (4) single family residential lots. The subject property is outside city limits and is located within the City of Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. With the subdivision being outside city limits the applicant is seeking approval to the requirements in UDC Sec. 21.14. I.K. to improve substandard roadways adjacent to proposed subdivision plats. GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is generally located 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The applicant is seeking approval of a waiver regarding the improvement to the substandard roadways adjacent to the proposed subdivision plat. The proposed subdivision is located on Green Valley Road. In accordance with UDC Sec. 21.14.1.x, Half Street or Adjacent Streets, requires that no new half streets shall be platted that do not conform to the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Comprehensive Land Plan. The proposed Rockin' S Subdivision on Green Valley Road would be required to widen and construct improvements to their half of Green Valley Road along their frontage as the current roadway does not meet the street standards identified in the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. However, the construction of such street improvements must also be 'roughly proportional' as per State Law. The Engineering Staff performed the rough proportionality calculations and determined that requiring the construction of the street improvements would not be 'roughly proportional' to the proposed subdivision's impact to the transportation system. Therefore, the Engineering Staff determined that in order to comply with the State Law Requirements, the construction of the street improvements should not be required for the proposed subdivision. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: In order to not require the construction of these improvements, a waiver from the requirements of UDC Sec 21.14. LK must be requested as Staff can not administratively waive construction of the street improvements. Based on the Engineering Departments review of the rough proportionality calculations it was determined that requiring the applicant to construct the street improvements would not be 'roughly proportional' to the proposed subdivision impact to the transportation system. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of the waiver to not construct adjacent street improvements for the proposed Rockin' S Subdivision. The proposed plat is dedicating 0.118 acres of land of right -of -way along the property frontage to provide for future street improvements on Green Valley Road. Planning Department Recommendation can COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial to meet requirements of the U Sec. 21.12.15. - Waivers. A.General. The Planning and Zoning Commission may authorize waivers from the provisions of this Article when, in its opinion, undue hardship will result from requiring strict compliance. In granting a waiver, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall prescribe only conditions that it deems necessary or desirable to the public interest. In making their findings, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall take into account the nature of the proposed use of the land involved and existing uses of land in the vicinity, the number of persons who will reside or work in the proposed subdivision, and the probable effect of such waivers upon traffic conditions and upon the public health, safety, convenience, and welfare in the vicinity. Waivers shall not be granted unless the Planning and Zoning Commission finds: 1.That the granting of the waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare, or injurious to other property in the area; and 2.That the granting of the waiver will not have the effect of preventing the orderly subdivision of other land in the area in accordance with the provisions of this UDC. Such findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission, together with the specified facts upon which such findings are based, shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which such waiver is granted. Waivers may be granted only when in harmony with the general purpose and intent of this UDC so that the public health, safety, and welfare may be secured and justice done. B.The Planning and Zoning Commission may establish a time period for execution of each granted waiver. C. Such findings together with the specific facts on which such findings are based shall be incorporated into the official minutes of the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting at which such exception is granted. D.Planning and zoning commission shall not authorize a waiver that would constitute a violation of a valid law, ordinance, code or regulation of the City. E.Any decision of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding waivers to the provisions of this Article may be appealed to the City Council. When considering an appeal, the City Council shall consider the same standards as the Planning and Zoning Commission as outlined above. Attachments Aerial Map Engineering Memo Replat Exhibit DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT To: Planning and Zoning Commission via Megan Harrison, Planner From: Jennifer R. Shortess, P.E., Engineer ;Y .. Date: March 15, 2022 Re: Recommendation for Waiver to Requirement to Improve the Roadway Adjacent to the Proposed Rockin S Subdivision The request is for a waiver to the requirement in UDC Section 21.14.1.K to improve substandard roadways adjacent to proposed subdivision plats. The proposed Rockin S Subdivision (south of IH -35 near the intersection of Eckhart Road and Green Valley Road) would be required to reconstruct one half of Green Valley Road along their frontage as the current roadway does not meet the street standards identified in the Master Thoroughfare Plan and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. However, construction of such street improvements must also be "roughly proportional" as per State Law. The Master Thoroughfare Plan has a defined process for calculating "rough proportionality" of street improvements. Staff has performed the rough proportionality calculations as follows: • Green Valley Road — 513 feet long; collector (1/2 lane); 500 vehicle miles capacity per mile of lane. (513/5,280) x (520) x (0.5) = 24 vehicle miles of capacity • Potential development — one additional single family residential unit. (1) x (3.37) = 3 vehicle miles generated Based on the calculations, construction of the street improvements would not be "roughly proportional" to the proposed subdivision's impact to the transportation system. Therefore, in order to comply with the State Law requirements, the construction of the street improvements should not be required for the proposed subdivision. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT In order to not require construction of these improvements, a waiver from the requirements of UDC Section 2I.14.I.K must be granted as Staff can not administratively waive construction of the street improvements. Therefore, Staff recommends approval of waiver to not construct adjacent street improvements for the proposed Rockin S Subdivision. The proposed plat is dedicating right-of-way to provide for future street improvements to Green Valley Road. Lo z c) LI) c c c C4 < < r- w 0 00 00 Ld U) (L LOCATION MAP. (N.T.S.) GENERAL NOTES.. 1. BASIS OF BEARING IS THE SOUTHEASfUNE OF THE 12.356 'ACRE TRACT AS. FOUND.MONUYENTED ON THE,rROUND. 2; . A I ILL SETRINS AREA �24 biAMEtER RtBAR WITH. AN' ORANGE PLASTIC CAP.STAMPb ."TRI.-COUNTY".., 3.� Ac I CORDING YO* FLO ODINSURANCt RATE MAP, 4646CO2�13F, DATED NOVEMBER 2., 2007, IS LOCAitb IN X AND, IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 4. IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN. .6. ELEVATIONS ARE NAVD88. 6. ALL OPEN. SPACE, COMMON AREAS_ GREENBEus, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER.OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR .9R ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY. THE CITY. T*NOTICE: SELLING A PORTIO N OF . THIS ADDITION BY METES.AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 8. SURVEY DATE: AUGUST 10, 2021 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDABLE LOTS 4 10. ENGINEERING BY:. TX2 ENGINEERING: F-20787 .1659 STATE HIGHWAY 46, STE 115-438 NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78132 TREVOR TAST, P.E. �11. WAVER REQUESTED: FOR THE REQUIREMENT TO CONNECT TO, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. A WAVER TO FORGO IMMEDIATE CONNECTION TO A.PUBLIC WASTEWATER SYSTEM AT TIME OF PLATTING (REGUIREMENT IN UDC SEC. 21.15.3) IS , REQUIRED FOR A PLAT TO MEET CITY'S suobIVISION REQUIREMENTS. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS, BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BYTHE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (CCMA) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. AGENT FOR CIBOLo CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF ROCK- ITS 3. 4. 5. AND 6. BLOCK 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED 13Y THE PLANNING'& ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. BY CHAIRMAN BY SECRETARY G VEC NOTES. 1. ALL G.V.E.C. EASEMENTS ARE ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICA11ON EASEMENTS. 2. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A 15- G.V.E.C. EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE, FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY UNES. 3. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A FLOATING 10' WIDE. BY 40' LONG GUY WRE EASEMENT TO BE LOCATED BY G.V.E.C. 4. ALL EXISTING G;V.E.0 0 . VERHEAD UNES POSSESS A 30' CENTEkUNE EASEMENT, 15' EACH SIDE OF UNE. 5. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER OBSTIRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND. UTIUlnES. 6. WHERE UNDERGROUND SERVICES ARE UTILIZED, G.V.E b. WILL POSSESS A 5 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT TO THE SERVICE METER 1_06ZION. EASEMENT TO FOLLOW SERVICE LINE AND WILL VARY DEPENDING ON LOCATION OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. THIS REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION HAS 13EEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED, 13Y GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC, COOP. FOR EASEMENTS. 'RT-MR G.V.E.C. GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL rPL-7 UTILITY DISTRICT CEiRiTIFICAll-Li THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, IN PERSON OR THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT. OF MARION, TEXAS, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT NTH THE RIGHT TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, INSTALL I AND LAY OVER AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS MARKED AS 'WATERLINE EASEMENT' AND IN ALL STREETS AND BYWAYS, SUCH PIPELINES, SERVICE LINES, WATER METERS AND OTHER WATER SYSTEM APPURTENANCES AS IT REQUIRES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID LANDS ALL TREESP SHRUBS, GRASSES, PAVEMENTS, FENCES STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH MAY INTERFERE WITH THE FACILITY OR THE,ACCESS THERETO. IT IS AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT NO BUILDING, CONCRETE SLAB ON WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT AREAS. NO OTHER UTILITY LINES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN 36- PARALLEL TO WATER LINES. ANY MONETARY LOSS TO GREEN VALLEY SUD RESULTING FROM MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT, LOCATED WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS DUE TO GRADE CHANGE OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS DEEMED RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID GRADE CHANGES OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS. UPON ENTERING IN AND UPON SAID EASEMENT, THE DISTRICT WILL ENDEAVOR TO RESTORE THE LAND SURFACE TO A LIKABLE CONDITION BUT IS NOT OBLIGATED TO RESTORE IT TO A PRE"EXISTING CONDITION. DATED THIS___��DAY OF 2022, A.D. PAT ALLEN/ GENERAL MANAGER: GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT 1. THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE.CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, HEREBY CERT`IFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT.CONFORMS TO ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. OWNER MICHAEL J. MOORE 77,30 GREEN VALLEY RD. MARION; TEXAS 78i24 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE OWNER,OF.THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. AND IN PERSON FOR THROUGH A DULY AUTHROIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE PUBLIC, AREA IDENTIFIED AS,PRIVATE, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES DRAINS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE.PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN, EXPRESSED. MICHAEL J. MOORE STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY. OF GUADALUPE: BEFORE ME,,THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL J. MOORE KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON. WHOSE NAME.-IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE'FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGE. -TO ME THAT T . HEY EXECUTED THE SA . M . E FO R THE PU RPOSE I S . AND C , ONSIDERATION S THE REIN . SSE . D . AN D I : N THE I CAPACIT I Y THERE IN STATED. I GIVEN *UNDER MY,HANDAND SEAL 0 F OFFIdE ,ON TH IS DAY OF. 20 1 22-7 A, KINZ NOTARY PUBLIC TATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF GUAbALUPE:' 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, AUBREY C, HOLLAND, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF. TEXAS, INDICATE. TO THE BEST OF my KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, 'THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND WAS, PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY MADE ON THE GROUND, UNDER MY SUPERVISION. — i D REGkTER611"HU� L'SMIUINAL L ku 114 N aUSTIN . STREET < SEGUIN, TEXAS, 78155 I 830�372-1001 REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIWSION LOT 1 SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING R.00KIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3,4,5, & 6 BLOCK 1 SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE L08 SANTOS COY SUR I VEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, GUADALLIPE.COUNW, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDi\ASION, PLAT. RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185,-PLATRECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. DATED THIS AY OF A.D., 2022., CITY ENGINEER JOB NO. 190,6103P2 SHEET 1 OF 21, = 0 FND 15' PIN U _ O O Zap O � O Nn I I N O X M r7 O 00 oZmin Z° W OL j( Q .`- N d AREA BEING REPLATTED BEING LOT 1 ROCKING S SUBDIVISION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS, GUADALUPE COUNTY. TEXAS. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. IN FND W PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. ly1 LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " oIQ Z O Z7 N C1J O O N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I O PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO p BARBARA A. WRIGHT, ET AL �>_ 23.625 Ac. b 278011043 ' ' - 127.92 I O SET PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. PIN LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m I 599.20' FND Vi' PIN - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY 10' ROADWAY S.U.D. EASEMENT ---- -- II/ DEDICATION J N Ut 0.118 Ac. O 1.00 �C. S"I V NON- ACCESS LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF � SE T 3 ► N C1J SET N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I P PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO 15_G.V.EC_ EASEMENT --- ___J -- m < '�• 11tIV - - -- A- 13315'23' I IR - 55.00' ' ' - 127.92 I O :0 'L i 1 .OT CJ 718 A � - 149'00'26' R - 25.00' �_ j1 Q U I� J L T - 90.17' , L - 65.02 1 5 W � O I 24' CROSS — I ACCESS EASEMENT L - - , 'J - I-1 1' NON- ACCESS - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY fi S.U.D. EASEMENT Ut O .P, I " 10' ROADWAY DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF _- -____t SET Vi PIN GO O cn UO FND 14' PIN REPLAT OF ROCKIN S S UBDI VISION LOT 1 LEGEND SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING CM = CONTROLUNG MONUMENT ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3, 4, 5, & 6 BLOCK 1 — U — - OVERHEAD UTILITY CTL - UTIUTY POLE SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE LOS SANTOS COY SURVEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, - GUY WIRE GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION, PLAT FND - FOUND RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. JOB NO. 1906103P2 SHEET 2 OF 2 TO: Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED Megan Harrison, Planner BY. CASE: PC2022 -014 SUBJECT: PC2022 -014 Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat of the Rockin' S Subdivision, an approximately 7.2 acre tract of land located approximately 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road, located in the Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction, Guadalupe County, Texas. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Michael Moore Authorized Agent: Tri- County Surveying Inc., Gloria Kinz APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: Date: Application Submittal Type: March S, 2022 Replat Application ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to replat Lot 1 of the Rockin' S Subdivision, approximately 7.2 acres of land, to establish 4 single - family lots. The Rockin'S Subdivision was platted in 2019 in order to establish two lots. A portion of the property, along Green Valley Road extending approximately 155 feet back is within the Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). The City of Cibolo was contacted as the remaining portion of the property is within their Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. The City of Cibolo deferred the review to the City of Schertz due to the frontage of the property is within the City of Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: The subject property is located 1,200 feet southwest of the intersection of Eckhardt Road and Green Valley Road. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION: The subject property is establishing 4 lots. Lot 4 will have frontage onto Green Valley Road. Lots 3, 5, & 6 will access Green Valley Road through a 24' access easement as there has been a P non - access easement placed on those lots to reduce the number of driveways onto the roadway. TREE MITIGATION AND PRESERVATION: The applicant is responsible for Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 21.9.9 Tree Preservation and Mitigation. The applicant has submitted a tree affidavit which indicates there are no protected and/or heritage class trees on site. PUBLIC SERVICES: The property will be serviced by Green Valley for water and Guadalupe Valley Electric Coop for electricity. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: All public improvements required for this subdivision are required to be installed prior to recording of the final plat per UDC, Section 21.4.15., unless otherwise specified in an approved development agreement. Water: The property will be serviced by Green Valley Special Utility District through a 5inch water line. Sewer: The applicant provided a request for a waiver to the requirement to extend public sanitary sewer to serve the proposed Rockin' S Subdivision and the requirement to extend across the proposed subdivision. The Engineering Department has reviewed the waiver request and determined that there was no sanitary sewer facilities existing in the area of the proposed subdivision. The closest facilities are located approximately 2,800 feet away. Based on the distance to the nearest public sanitary sewer and to extend the wastewater lines along their entire frontage of the subdivision, staff identified that this waiver request is reasonable and consistent with other sewer connection waiver requests. Therefore, Engineering supports the granting of the waiver and notes that it is consistent with the similar waiver request granted in the City. If the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the request waiver, the site will be serviced by on -site sewage facilities (OSSF) and will be required to go through Guadalupe County for permitting. Drainage: The applicant is responsible for all drainage associated with the subject property, and for compliance with Stormwater regulations. A Stormwater Management Plan has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Road Improvements: The replat for Rockin' S Subdivision is located in the City of Schertz Extraterritorial Jurisdiction. They are dedicating 0.118 acres of land for right -of -way dedication for Green Valley Road. The property is dedicating right -of -way in order to meet their half of Green Valley Road as they will not be making improvements to the roadway section. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The replat is consistent with applicable requirements for the property, ordinances, and regulations. It has been reviewed by the Fire, Enzineerine. Planning and Public Works Denartments with no obiections. Therefore. staff recommends annroval of the replat as submitted. Planning Department Recommendation X Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial * While the Commission can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final approval authority of the proposed replat. In considering final action on a replat, the Commission should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.12.13. Attachments Aerial Map Replat Exhibit Lo z c) LI) c c c C4 < < r- w 0 00 00 Ld U) (L LOCATION MAP. (N.T.S.) GENERAL NOTES.. 1. BASIS OF BEARING IS THE SOUTHEASfUNE OF THE 12.356 'ACRE TRACT AS. FOUND.MONUYENTED ON THE,rROUND. 2; . A I ILL SETRINS AREA �24 biAMEtER RtBAR WITH. AN' ORANGE PLASTIC CAP.STAMPb ."TRI.-COUNTY".., 3.� Ac I CORDING YO* FLO ODINSURANCt RATE MAP, 4646CO2�13F, DATED NOVEMBER 2., 2007, IS LOCAitb IN X AND, IS NOT WITHIN THE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN. 4. IMPROVEMENTS NOT SHOWN. .6. ELEVATIONS ARE NAVD88. 6. ALL OPEN. SPACE, COMMON AREAS_ GREENBEus, DRAINAGE EASEMENTS OR OTHER AREAS IDENTIFIED AS PRIVATE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE OWNER.OR OWNERS SUCCESSORS AND OR ASSIGNS PROVIDED SUCH SUCCESSOR .9R ASSIGN IS APPROVED BY. THE CITY. T*NOTICE: SELLING A PORTIO N OF . THIS ADDITION BY METES.AND BOUNDS IS A VIOLATION OF CITY ORDINANCES AND STATE LAW AND IS SUBJECT TO FINES AND WITHHOLDING OF UTILITIES AND PERMITS. 8. SURVEY DATE: AUGUST 10, 2021 6. TOTAL NUMBER OF BUILDABLE LOTS 4 10. ENGINEERING BY:. TX2 ENGINEERING: F-20787 .1659 STATE HIGHWAY 46, STE 115-438 NEW BRAUNFELS, TEXAS 78132 TREVOR TAST, P.E. �11. WAVER REQUESTED: FOR THE REQUIREMENT TO CONNECT TO, EXISTING SANITARY SEWER. A WAVER TO FORGO IMMEDIATE CONNECTION TO A.PUBLIC WASTEWATER SYSTEM AT TIME OF PLATTING (REGUIREMENT IN UDC SEC. 21.15.3) IS , REQUIRED FOR A PLAT TO MEET CITY'S suobIVISION REQUIREMENTS. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT HAS, BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED BYTHE CIBOLO CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY (CCMA) FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT CAPACITY AND EASEMENTS. ALL FEES DUE FOR IMPACT TO THE SYSTEM AT TIME OF CONNECTION WILL BE CALCULATED AT SUBMITTAL OF BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION. AGENT FOR CIBOLo CREEK MUNICIPAL AUTHORITY THIS PLAT OF ROCK- ITS 3. 4. 5. AND 6. BLOCK 1 HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO AND CONSIDERED 13Y THE PLANNING'& ZONING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND HEREBY APPROVED BY SUCH COMMISSION. BY CHAIRMAN BY SECRETARY G VEC NOTES. 1. ALL G.V.E.C. EASEMENTS ARE ELECTRIC AND COMMUNICA11ON EASEMENTS. 2. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A 15- G.V.E.C. EASEMENT ALONG ALL SIDE, FRONT AND REAR PROPERTY UNES. 3. EACH LOT IS SUBJECT TO A FLOATING 10' WIDE. BY 40' LONG GUY WRE EASEMENT TO BE LOCATED BY G.V.E.C. 4. ALL EXISTING G;V.E.0 0 . VERHEAD UNES POSSESS A 30' CENTEkUNE EASEMENT, 15' EACH SIDE OF UNE. 5. ALL UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO REMOVAL OF TREES AND OTHER OBSTIRUCTIONS), READING OF METERS, AND REPAIR OF ALL OVERHEAD AND UNDERGROUND. UTIUlnES. 6. WHERE UNDERGROUND SERVICES ARE UTILIZED, G.V.E b. WILL POSSESS A 5 FOOT WIDE EASEMENT TO THE SERVICE METER 1_06ZION. EASEMENT TO FOLLOW SERVICE LINE AND WILL VARY DEPENDING ON LOCATION OF BUILDING OR STRUCTURE. THIS REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION HAS 13EEN SUBMITTED TO AND APPROVED, 13Y GUADALUPE VALLEY ELECTRIC, COOP. FOR EASEMENTS. 'RT-MR G.V.E.C. GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL rPL-7 UTILITY DISTRICT CEiRiTIFICAll-Li THE OWNER OF THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT AND WHOSE NAME IS SUBSCRIBED HERETO, IN PERSON OR THROUGH A DULY AUTHORIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT. OF MARION, TEXAS, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, A PERPETUAL EASEMENT NTH THE RIGHT TO ERECT, CONSTRUCT, INSTALL I AND LAY OVER AND ACROSS THOSE AREAS MARKED AS 'WATERLINE EASEMENT' AND IN ALL STREETS AND BYWAYS, SUCH PIPELINES, SERVICE LINES, WATER METERS AND OTHER WATER SYSTEM APPURTENANCES AS IT REQUIRES, TOGETHER WITH THE RIGHT OF INGRESS AND EGRESS. THE RIGHT TO REMOVE FROM SAID LANDS ALL TREESP SHRUBS, GRASSES, PAVEMENTS, FENCES STRUCTURES, IMPROVEMENTS, OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS WHICH MAY INTERFERE WITH THE FACILITY OR THE,ACCESS THERETO. IT IS AGREED AND UNDERSTOOD THAT NO BUILDING, CONCRETE SLAB ON WALLS WILL BE PLACED WITHIN SAID EASEMENT AREAS. NO OTHER UTILITY LINES MAY BE LOCATED WITHIN 36- PARALLEL TO WATER LINES. ANY MONETARY LOSS TO GREEN VALLEY SUD RESULTING FROM MODIFICATIONS REQUIRED OF UTILITY EQUIPMENT, LOCATED WITHIN SAID EASEMENTS DUE TO GRADE CHANGE OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS SHALL BE CHARGED TO THE PERSON OR PERSONS DEEMED RESPONSIBLE FOR SAID GRADE CHANGES OR GROUND ELEVATION ALTERATIONS. UPON ENTERING IN AND UPON SAID EASEMENT, THE DISTRICT WILL ENDEAVOR TO RESTORE THE LAND SURFACE TO A LIKABLE CONDITION BUT IS NOT OBLIGATED TO RESTORE IT TO A PRE"EXISTING CONDITION. DATED THIS___��DAY OF 2022, A.D. PAT ALLEN/ GENERAL MANAGER: GREEN VALLEY SPECIAL UTILITY DISTRICT 1. THE UNDERSIGNED, CITY ENGINEER OF THE.CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, HEREBY CERT`IFY THAT THIS SUBDIVISION PLAT.CONFORMS TO ALL THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS OF THE CITY AS TO WHICH THIS APPROVAL IS REQUIRED. OWNER MICHAEL J. MOORE 77,30 GREEN VALLEY RD. MARION; TEXAS 78i24 OWNER'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT THE OWNER,OF.THE LAND SHOWN ON THIS PLAT. AND IN PERSON FOR THROUGH A DULY AUTHROIZED AGENT, DEDICATES TO THE PUBLIC, AREA IDENTIFIED AS,PRIVATE, FOREVER ALL STREETS, ALLEYS, PARKS, WATERCOURSES DRAINS, AND PUBLIC PLACES THEREON SHOWN FOR THE.PURPOSE AND CONSIDERATION THEREIN, EXPRESSED. MICHAEL J. MOORE STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY. OF GUADALUPE: BEFORE ME,,THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, ON THIS DAY PERSONALLY APPEARED MICHAEL J. MOORE KNOWN TO ME TO BE THE PERSON. WHOSE NAME.-IS SUBSCRIBED TO THE'FOREGOING INSTRUMENT, AND ACKNOWLEDGE. -TO ME THAT T . HEY EXECUTED THE SA . M . E FO R THE PU RPOSE I S . AND C , ONSIDERATION S THE REIN . SSE . D . AN D I : N THE I CAPACIT I Y THERE IN STATED. I GIVEN *UNDER MY,HANDAND SEAL 0 F OFFIdE ,ON TH IS DAY OF. 20 1 22-7 A, KINZ NOTARY PUBLIC TATE OF TEXAS STATE OF TEXAS: COUNTY OF GUAbALUPE:' 1, THE UNDERSIGNED, AUBREY C, HOLLAND, A REGISTERED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR IN THE STATE OF. TEXAS, INDICATE. TO THE BEST OF my KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, 'THIS PLAT IS TRUE AND CORRECT AND WAS, PREPARED FROM AN ACTUAL SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY MADE ON THE GROUND, UNDER MY SUPERVISION. — i D REGkTER611"HU� L'SMIUINAL L ku 114 N aUSTIN . STREET < SEGUIN, TEXAS, 78155 I 830�372-1001 REPLAT OF ROCKIN' S SUBDIWSION LOT 1 SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING R.00KIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3,4,5, & 6 BLOCK 1 SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE L08 SANTOS COY SUR I VEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, GUADALLIPE.COUNW, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDi\ASION, PLAT. RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185,-PLATRECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. DATED THIS AY OF A.D., 2022., CITY ENGINEER JOB NO. 190,6103P2 SHEET 1 OF 21, = 0 FND 15' PIN U _ O O Zap O � O Nn I I N O X M r7 O 00 oZmin Z° W OL j( Q .`- N d AREA BEING REPLATTED BEING LOT 1 ROCKING S SUBDIVISION PREVIOUSLY RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS, GUADALUPE COUNTY. TEXAS. GRAPHIC SCALE ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 100 ft. IN FND W PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. ly1 LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " oIQ Z O Z7 N C1J O O N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I O PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO p BARBARA A. WRIGHT, ET AL �>_ 23.625 Ac. b 278011043 ' ' - 127.92 I O SET PIN SET PIN SET PIN I HAROLD M. KLAERNER 12.312 Ac. 669/102 I 15' G.V.E.C. EASEMENT , N 60'17'45" E N J� C N 4 N 00 O !b 03 �L I SET 2.240 Ac. PIN LOT S.U.D. 4 ---- -- II/ DEDICATION N j CO J N -P 0.118 Ac. O CO ul m I 599.20' FND Vi' PIN - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY 10' ROADWAY S.U.D. EASEMENT ---- -- II/ DEDICATION J N Ut 0.118 Ac. O 1.00 �C. S"I V NON- ACCESS LO (o I " EASEMENT 10' ROADWAY " DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF � SE T 3 ► N C1J SET N 60'22'0 E 354.61' P IN I P PIN h J 30.0 ) jam O N 60'22 00" E 347.48' m = UO 15_G.V.EC_ EASEMENT --- ___J -- m < '�• 11tIV - - -- A- 13315'23' I IR - 55.00' ' ' - 127.92 I O :0 'L i 1 .OT CJ 718 A � - 149'00'26' R - 25.00' �_ j1 Q U I� J L T - 90.17' , L - 65.02 1 5 W � O I 24' CROSS — I ACCESS EASEMENT L - - , 'J - I-1 1' NON- ACCESS - -- S 60'22'00" 1.942 Ac. LOT C 6 U7 O --------------- .c• r_vF.0 EASEMENT 582.35' J 592.36 S I ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 2 9/185 ' ° �o ° Ox CO C1 `I ED I OOIMI SET PIN 584.8 S 60'22'00' W REPLAT I 1 I I 0 0 ox I� m 1 =� I�O IVV 1 1V GREEN VALLEY fi S.U.D. EASEMENT Ut O .P, I " 10' ROADWAY DEDICATION tO.OD' 0.118 AF _- -____t SET Vi PIN GO O cn UO FND 14' PIN REPLAT OF ROCKIN S S UBDI VISION LOT 1 LEGEND SUBDIVISION PLAT ESTABLISHING CM = CONTROLUNG MONUMENT ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION LOT 3, 4, 5, & 6 BLOCK 1 — U — - OVERHEAD UTILITY CTL - UTIUTY POLE SITUATED IN THE EMANUEL DE LOS SANTOS COY SURVEY NO. 93, ABSTRACT 87, - GUY WIRE GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, BEING ALL OF LOT 1, ROCKIN' S SUBDIVISION, PLAT FND - FOUND RECORDED IN VOLUME 9, PAGE 185, PLAT RECORDS GUADALUPE, TEXAS. JOB NO. 1906103P2 SHEET 2 OF 2 • SUBJECT Current Projects and City Council Status Update DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The following is being provided for information purposes only so that the Planning and Zoning Commission is aware of the current status of new site plan applications, status of applications heard by the Commission and recommended for final action by the City Council, and the status of administratively approved applications. NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: • There were no new site plan applications submitted to the Planning and Community Development Department between March 10 and March 18. CITY COUNCIL RESULTS: The following development applications were recommended for final action to the City Council: • Ord. 22 -S -11: A rezone of approximately 9 acres of land from General Business District (GB) and Pre- Development District (PRE) to General Business District (GB) and General Business District -2 (GB2) • Recommended for approval at the February 9, 2022 P &Z (7 -0 vote) • Scheduled for first reading at the March 22 CC Meeting • Ord. 22 -S -15: A request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 2.7 acres of land. • Recommended for approval at the March 9, 2022 P &Z (6 -0 vote) • Schedule for first reading at the April 5 CC Meeting ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED PROJECTS: • There were no site development applications administratively approved between March 10 and March 18.