BOA 4.24.23 Agenda with associated documents.
MEETING AGENDA
SCHERTZ BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
April 24, 2023
HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS
1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4
SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154
CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES
Do the right thing
Do the best you can
Treat others the way you want to be treated
Work cooperatively as a team
AGENDA
MONDAY, APRIL 24, 2023 at 6:00 p.m.
The Board of Adjustment will hold this meeting at 6:00p.m., Monday, April 24, 2023 at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers. In lieu of
attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live steam on the City's YouTube Channel.
1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED
3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS
Residents who choose to watch the meeting via live stream, but who would like to participate in
Hearing of Residents, should email their comments to the Planning Division, at planning@schertz.com
by 5:00p.m. on Monday, April 24, 2023, so that the Planning Division may read the public comments
into the record under the hearing of residents. In the body of the email please include your name, your
address, phone number, agenda item number if applicable or subject of discussion, and your
comments.
This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Board of Adjustment. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior
to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Board of any item not on the agenda shall
be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an
inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda,
will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.
4.CONSENT AGENDA:
A.Minutes for the March 6th, 2023 Regular Meeting.
5.PUBLIC HEARING:
The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing related to variance requests within this agenda. The public hearing will be
opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any
other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Board will discuss and consider the
application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Board will
act on the applicant's request.
Board of Adjustment April 24, 2023 Page 1 of 2
A.PLVAR20230038 - A request for a variance to Unified Development Code Article 9 Section 21.9.8
Screening and Fencing, in order to permit an opaque fence within the front yards of 4710 Shady Lane
and 4715 Troy Lane, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas
B.PLVAR20230027 - A request for a variance to Unified Development Code Section 21.11.9 in order to
permit an additional wall sign on a multi-tenant building located at 17670 Four Oaks Lane, City of
Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas
6.ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A.Announcements by Members
City and community events attended and to be attended
Continuing education events attended and to be attended
B.Announcements by City Staff
City and community events attended and to be attended
Continuing education events attended and to be attended
Committee of Committees Advisory Board Meeting Summaries
7.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING
CERTIFICATION
I, Samuel Haas, Senior Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the
21st day of April, 2023 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter
551, Texas Government Code.
Samuel Haas
Samuel Haas, Senior Planner
I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Board of Adjustment was removed from the official bulletin
board on _____day of _______________, 2023. _______________title:_____________
This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance
or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619-1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting.
The Board of Adjustment for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss
any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act.
Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive
Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and
constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available
opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent
to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this
opinion.
Board of Adjustment April 24, 2023 Page 2 of 2
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING: 04/24/2023
Agenda Item 4 A
TO:Board of Adjustment
PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner
SUBJECT:Minutes for the March 6th, 2023 Regular Meeting.
Attachments
BOA Minutes 3.06.23
D R A F T
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MINUTES
March 6, 2023
The Schertz Board of Adjustment convened on March 6, 2023 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council
Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas.
Present: Richard Dziewit, Chair
Reginna Agee, Board Member
Earl Hartzog, Board Member
Frank McElroy, Board Member
Ferrando Heyward, Board Member
Yvonne Griffen, Board Member
Absent: Danielene Salas, Board Member
Staff present:Emily Delgado, Planning Manager
Tiffany Danhof, Administrative Assistant
1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL
Mr. Dziewit called the meeting to order at 6:04 P.M.
2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED
Mr. Heyward was seated as the alternate.
3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS
Residents who choose to watch the meeting via live stream, but who would like to participate in Hearing of Residents, should email their
comments to the Planning Division, at planning@schertz.com by 5:00p.m. on Monday, March 6, 2023, so that the Planning Division
may read the public comments into the record under the hearing of residents. In the body of the email please include your name, your
address, phone number, agenda item number if applicable or subject of discussion, and your comments.
This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Board of Adjustment. Each person should fill out the
Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by
the Board of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to
any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future
agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have
signed up to speak in the order they have registered.
No one spoke.
4.CONSENT AGENDA:
A.Minutes for the November 29, 2022 Regular Meeting.
Motioned by Board Member Frank McElroy, seconded by Board Member Earl
Hartzog to approve November 29, 2022 Regular Meeting
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
B.Minutes for the January 31, 2022, Regular Meeting.
Motioned by Board Member Earl Hartzog, seconded by Board Member Reginna
Agee to approve January 31, 2022 Regular Meeting
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
5.PUBLIC HEARING:
The Board of Adjustment will hold a public hearing related to variance requests within this agenda. The
public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners
affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing
will be closed. The Board will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information
from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Board will act on the applicant's request.
A.PLVAR20220227 - Hold a public hearing, consider and act upon a request for a
variance to Unified Development Code Article 11, Section 21.11.12- Multi-Tenant Signs,
in order to permit a multi-tenant sign with increased maximum height, increased
maximum area, and removal of the requirement for masonry on multi-tenant signs,
located at 17975 IH 35 N, Unit B, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.
Mrs. Delgado gave a presentation.
Mr. Dziewit opened the public hearing at 6:20 P.M.
Greg Burkett-7208 South WW White Rd
Will Holbsock- Construction Manager of Murdoch's Project
Joe Simmons- Owner of property 17975 IH 35 N
Mr. Dziewit closed the public hearing at 6:22 P.M.
Motioned by Board Member Frank McElroy, seconded by Board Member Ferrando
Heyward to approve the increased maximum 280 square area, 50ft maximum height,
and removal of the requirement for masonry on the multi-tenant signs
Vote: 5 - 0 Passed
6.ANNOUNCEMENTS:
A.Announcements by Members
City and community events attended and to be attended
Continuing education events attended and to be attended
There were no announcements by Members.
B.Announcements by City Staff
City and community events attended and to be attended
Continuing education events attended and to be attended
There were no announcements by City Staff.
7.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING
Mr. Dziewit adjourned the regular meeting at 6:44 P.M.
____________________________________
Chairman, Board of Adjustment
______________________________
Recording Secretary, City of Schertz
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING: 04/24/2023
Agenda Item 5 A
TO:Board of Adjustment
PREPARED BY:Emily Delgado, Planning Manager
CASE:PLVAR20230038
SUBJECT:PLVAR20230038 - A request for a variance to Unified Development Code Article 9 Section 21.9.8 Screening and
Fencing, in order to permit an opaque fence within the front yards of 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane, City of
Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owner / Applicant: Todd Alexander
REQUEST
Date Application Type
February 28, 2023 Variance Application
PUBLIC NOTICE:
The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express" on April 5, 2023. There were twenty-five
(25) notices mailed to surrounding property owners on March 30, 2023. At the time of this staff report, staff has
received three (3) responses in favor and zero (0) responses opposed or neutral to the request
ITEM SUMMARY:
The property owner of 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane has requested a variance to UDC Article 9 Section
21.9.8 Screening and Fencing, in order to permit an opaque fence within the front yards of the subject properties.
Article 9 Section 21.9.8 stipulates that a fence in the front yard can be a maximum of four feet (4') in height and
shall be non-opaque, decorative fence material. However, the applicant is requesting to install a six foot (6') opaque
wood privacy fence in order to increase privacy and security of their property.
The subject properties (4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane) are located within the Live Oak Hills Subdivision.
This subdivision, although platted property and platted lots do not have water, sewer, and both Shady Lane and
Troy Lane are unimproved / undeveloped roadways. The applicant uses the subject properties for residential
purposes.
SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION, LAND USE AND ZONING:
The subject properties are located at 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane, which are part of the Live Oak Hills
Subdivision.
Existing Zoning Land Use
Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Residential
Adjacent Properties:
Zoning Land Use
North Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Undeveloped
South Single-Family Residential District (R-5)Residential (Carolina Crossing)
East Undeveloped Right of Way Troy Lane
West Undeveloped Right of Way Shady Lane
CRITERIA FOR REVIEW
According to Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 3, Section 21.3.4.B, in order to make a finding of hardship
and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following:
1. The requested variance does violate the intent of the UDC or its amendments;
The requested variance does violate the UDC based on the maximum allowable fence height and material allowed
in the front yard of a residential property. However, based on the properties conditions of being adjacent to
undeveloped properties with no current City services (water or sewer), and being located at the terminus of Shady
Lane and Troy Lane which are non-constructed streets, and the proposed fence is to ensure privacy and security on
the residential property, there is a minimal impact on the adjacent undeveloped properties and the rear properties of
the adjacent Carolina Crossing subdivision. Additionally, in 2019 a variance request (BOA2019-002) was approved
for 4709 Shady Lane, which is directly across the Shady Lane right of way from the subject properties. This
variance granted the property owner the ability to install a six foot tall wood privacy fence in the front yard, which
is consistent with the current request for 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane.
2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features exist that are peculiar to the subject
parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district ;
The subject property does not have any special conditions that would not be applicable to other properties currently
zoned Single Family Residential (R-2) zoned properties. However, the Live Oak Hills Subdivision, although a
platted subdivision does not have public infrastructure (water, sewer, sidewalks, and paved roadways) that similar
platted subdivisions have installed. The subject properties are at the terminus of Shady Lane right of way and Troy
Lane right of way. Due to the properties being at the terminus of unconstructed roadways, they should be evaluated
differently than a standard residential lot.
3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions; or
The property owner is requesting the increased height and opaque fence material (6 foot tall wood privacy fence).
Per the variance justification letter submitted by the applicant the desire to have the opaque fence in the front yard is
to increase privacy and safety with the newly created City of Schertz walking trail which is approximately 55 feet
from the subject properties. However, based on the previous variance case in 2019 being granted, and being for the
property across Shady Lane right of way, the proposed variance request would be consistent with what is already
occurring in the area.
4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the
same provisions.
Although utilizing the UDC in its strict interpretation would be consistent with allowable fence in other areas in the
City of Schertz, the two subject properties are unique in nature. The subject properties are at the terminus of two
roadways that have not been constructed, there is no water or sewer facilities in the area, and the City of Schertz
recently constructed a walking trail in the area. The subject properties are in between the City of Schertz trail and
the rear of the Carolina Crossing Subdivision, which make them unique in nature compared to other properties with
the same zoning designation.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of PLVAR20230038, if approved the variance would allow for the desired privacy
fence in the front yards of 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane. In addition, it would allow the entirety of these
lots to have a consistent 6 foot high, opaque (wood privacy fence) which would provide the desired safety and
security of the property owner. The proposed fence is consistent with the fence located at 4709 Shady Lane
(directly across Shady Lane right of way) that previously received a variance for the fence material. The proposed
variance and desired fence would pose a minimal to no impact on the adjacent property owners (the City of
Schertz, and the rear of adjacent lots in Carolina Crossing). Additionally, the wood fence would eliminate the
current wire fence with black material (as shown in the photos provided by the applicant) and would increase the
aesthetic quality of the fence for those utilizing the walking trail while providing the privacy desired by the property
owner. Staff recommends approval of PLVAR20230038, to allow a 6 foot high wood privacy fence in the front
yards of 4710 Shady Lane and 4715 Troy Lane.
Attachments
Aerial Exhibit
Public Hearing Notice Map
Variance Justification Form and Supporting Documents from Applicant
Public Hearing Responses
CASE NUMBER_____________________________
Board of Adjustment may grant variances or modifications of height, yard, area, coverage, parking regulations, accessory
building and non-conforming use subject to making a finding of hardship that the variance meets all four of the following
criteria. State how your request meets these conditions.
Description of variance request:
The variance request is a modification of the current, previously permitted fence. Change from transparent (cattle
wire) to Opaque (6’ wood fence boards) fencing making the fence materials align with most of the property fencing
within the city and other neighborhoods.
1. Does the requested variance violate the intent of the Unified Development Code or deprive the applicant of right
commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the same provisions?
☒Yes ☐ No
Explain: Due to actions by the city we are currently being deprived of our right to privacy, safety, and enjoyment of our
parcels of land. It would only violate the code if the request was for a new fence, but the request is for modification on an
existing fence installed many years ago with a permit. At the time the fence was installed, there was no need for an opaque
fence, however, due to the new walking trail and the subsequent exposure to public view, there is a need now. The variance
is not for a new fence, it is for modification of materials from transparent to opaque. Based on the properties conditions of
being adjacent to undeveloped properties with no current City services (water or sewer), and being located at the terminus
of Shady Lane and Troy Lane, non - constructed streets, and being located directly adjacent to our residential property, the
constructed fence height and material poses minimal impact on the adjacent undeveloped properties.
2. Do special conditions or restricted area, shape, topography, or physical features exist that are irregular to the subject
parcel of land and not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning districts?
☒ Yes ☐ No
Explain: Yes, this was an undeveloped area without plans for development 16 years ago when the fence was permitted. At
that time there was no need for an opaque fence. The property was secluded with only right-of-way access to the property.
That has been changed by the city. The city created a public path approximately 55 feet from our parcel of land which has
made our parcels of land viewable to the public making us vulnerable to public actions, public viewing, and reduction of
safety which results in us no longer being able to enjoy our land or privacy. The subject properties do not have any special
conditions that would not be applicable to other properties currently zoned Single Family Residential (R -2) zoned
properties. However, the Live Oak Hills Subdivision, although a platted subdivision, does not have public infrastructure
( water, sewer, sidewalks, and paved roadways) that similar platted subdivisions have installed. The subject properties are at
the terminus of Shady Lane and Troy Lane and directly adjacent to the rear of our residential property and City of
Schertz owned properties.
3. Is the hardship the result of the applicant’s own actions or intended for financial interest?
☐Yes ☒ No
Explain: No, the construction of a walking trail approximately 55 feet from the properties and the denial of a permit to
modify the current fencing to regain our privacy, safety, and enjoyment is what caused the hardship.
4. Would granting this variance be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to the value of property in the vicinity?
☐Yes ☒ No
1
Emily Delgado
From:Mario Jr. <mariojuniorsmail@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, April 13, 2023 9:04 AM
To:planning@schertz.com
Subject:PLVAR20230038 - Reply Form
Attachments:schertz_plvar20230038.pdf
Emily,
Good morning. Attached is a signed copy of the reply form with my comments. A wooden fence is acceptable to
me. No visible chain link fencing with privacy (mesh) screens.
Attendance for the public hearing on the 24th is optional is that correct? Is my signed reply form and this email sufficient
enough for me not to attend?
Very Respectfully,
Mario Vielmann
BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING: 04/24/2023
Agenda Item 5 B
TO:Board of Adjustment
PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner
CASE:PLVAR20230027
SUBJECT:PLVAR20230027 - A request for a variance to Unified Development Code Section 21.11.9 in order to permit an
additional wall sign on a multi-tenant building located at 17670 Four Oaks Lane, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County,
Texas
GENERAL INFORMATION:
Owner: Four Oaks Distribution Center, LLC.
Applicant: Aria Signs & Design
REQUEST
Date:Application Type
02/20/2023 Variance Application
PUBLIC NOTICE:
The public hearing notice was published in the "San Antonio Express" on April 5th, 2023. There were seven (7)
notices mailed to surrounding property owners on March 30th, 2023. At the time of this staff report, staff has
received zero (0) responses opposed, neutral, or in favor.
ITEM SUMMARY:
The property owner at 17670 Four Oaks Lane is requesting a variance to UDC Section 21.11.9 Wall Signs, in order
to permit a sign greater than the maximum allowable square footage, as well as additional signs on a multi-tenant
building.
Article 11, Section 21.11.9.B states that the maximum allowable square footage for a wall sign on Four Oaks Lane
is 80 square feet. The applicant is proposing 2 signs that are each 140 square feet in size.
Article 11, Section 21.11.9.C. states that the maximum number of signs permitted for multi-tenant buildings shall
be limited to one (1) per tenant or lease space except for those spaces located on the ends of buildings which may
have one (1) additional wall sign to be located on the side wall of the structure and being a maximum of
seventy-five percent (75%) of the area of the primary wall sign. In no case shall the number of wall signs permitted
for any single tenant within a multi-tenant development exceed a maximum of two (2) signs.
The applicant is proposing one large sign on the primary wall an additional sign on the side wall, and two
additional signs for the primary wall above the showroom entrance.
UDC Section Currently Allowed Requested Variance Proposal
Art. 11 Section
21.11.9.B.: Wall Sign Size
80 sq feet 140 feet Due to the property being an
industrial building applicant
proposes a larger wall sign.
Art. 11 Section 21.11.9.C:
Maximum Allowable Signs
Multi-tenant buildings allow for 2
total signs. 1 on the primary facade
and 1 one the secondary wall.
4 signs The proposed signage would
have 3 primary facade signs and
1 secondary wall sign
SUBJECT PROPERTY GENERAL LOCATION, LAND USE AND ZONING:
The property is located at 17670 Four Oaks Lane within the Four Oaks Commercial subdivision.
Existing Zoning Land Use
Manufacturing - Light District
(M-1)
Warehouse/Industrial
Adjacent Properties:
Zoning Land Use
North Manufacturing - Light District (M-1)Industrial
South Right of Way Four Oaks Lane
East Planned Development District (PDD) - Garden Ridge Commercial Vacant
West Manufacturing - Light District (M-1)Hotel
CRITERIA FOR REVIEW
According to Unified Development Code (UDC), Article 3, Section 21.3.4.B, in order to make a finding of hardship
and grant a variance from the zoning regulations of the UDC, the Board must determine the following:
1. The requested variance does violate the intent of the UDC or its amendments;
The requested variance does violate the intent of the UDC based on the maximum square footage allowed for a
wall sign on an industrial property on Four Oaks Lane. The UDC has wall sign square footage limits for three
different classifications of streets: "Areas with Limited Access, Areas with Unlimited Access, and All Other
Streets". Four Oaks Lane is considered "All Other Streets" and thus the maximum allowable square footage for a
sign is 80 square feet.
The requested variance also violates the intent of the UDC based on the maximum allowable signs for multi-tenant
buildings. The request is asking for two additional signs on the primary wall when only one is permitted. The total
maximum allowable signs for a multi-tenant building is two (2). One for the primary facade, and one for the
secondary wall.
2. Special conditions of restricted area, topography or physical features exist that are peculiar to the subject
parcel of land and are not applicable to other parcels of land in the same zoning district.
There are no special conditions that exist on the property. The subject property has similar topography and physical
features as other parcels within the same zoning district. The applicant has stated that the size and use of the
building is a factor when determining wall signs; however, there are other similar uses and buildings withing the
same zoning district that abides by the UDC wall sign requirements.
Other buildings in the same zoning district abut different classifications of roadways. The IH 35 frontage road for
example is an "Area with Limited Access" and this has a greater maximum square footage allowed for wall signs.
Four Oaks Lane; however, is listed as "All Other Streets".
3. The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions.
The hardship is the result of the applicant's own actions. The UDC allows for two wall signs, and the maximum
square footage for the primary sign is 80 square feet, while the maximum for the secondary sign is 75% of the
primary.
4. The interpretation of the provisions in this UDC or any amendments thereto would not deprive the
applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same zoning district that comply with the
same provisions.
There are similar uses and buildings within the Manufacturing - Light (M-1) District that abide by the UDC wall
sign standards. The interpretation and provisions in UDC Article 11 are commonly adhered to and do not deprive
the applicant of any rights that other property owners have.
STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION:
UDC Article 11, Section 21.11.9. has limitations on the maximum allowable square footage for a wall sign on an
industrial building that abuts Four Oaks Lane. Due to the classification of roadway, and the property location, staff
believes that the UDC requirements are appropriate. The UDC also has clear limitations for industrial buildings
with multiple tenants, with only allowing two wall signs. One (1) sign on the primary wall, and another on the
secondary wall. The applicant is requesting three (3) total signs on the primary wall for a total of four (4) signs.
This request violates the intent of the UDC and would provide the applicant special privileges that other property
owners within the same zoning district do not have. Therefore, staff is recommending denial of the variance request.
Attachments
Aerial Exhibit
Public Hearing Notice Map
Variance Application & Supporting Documents
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
!P
gg
g
g
gg
g
g
g
ggg
g
g
g
g
gg g
g
g
gg
g
g
g
g
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
186028PV SCHERTZLLC
129817
EYF STNL C
L
U
B
DEAL 4 LP
129818NELSONTHOMAS S 175812BABCOCKROAD 165 LTD
134190MURPHY OILUSA INC
79801VESTALWALTER J
70510BRAVOINVESTMENTS LTD
175818RYAN COMPANIESUS INC
39410SAN ANTONIOSHOE INC
15
9
7
0
4
M
A
S
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
C
O
L
P
115923SCHERTZ RETAILPLAZA LLC
129819NWC 3009/FOUROAKS LTD
1
6
9
6
1
7
H
A
L
L
E
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
I
E
S
L
L
C
128419FM 3009HORIZON L P
79805
BRAVO
INVESTME
N
T
S
L
T
D
151492WEALTH ALLIANCEPROPERTIES INC
175817BABCOCKROAD 165 LTD
186
0
2
6
C &
W
R
A
N
C
H
E
S
L
T
D
186027PV SCHERTZLLC
13190943 OAKSINVESTMENTS LLC
126128DOLMAN ROBERT &CHRISTINE TRUST
134191WAL-MART REAL ESTATEBUSINESS TRUST
62840VOIGT MARVIN R &KLABUNDE MELVA
148816CITY OF SANANTONIO
175819BABCOCKROAD 165 LTD
79803HARTMANN LAND &CATTLE CO LTD ET AL
1758
1
4
CVP-
C
I
B
O
L
O
DB L
L
C
18
6
0
2
9
C
&
W
R
A
N
C
H
E
S
L
T
D
131908NIDHIPARTNERS LTD 175813BABCOCKROAD 165 LTD
180360FOUR OAKS DISTRIBUTIONCENTER LLC
175811BABCOCK ROAD165 LTD
15
9
7
0
5
M
A
S
D
E
V
E
L
O
P
M
E
N
T
C
O
L
P
54550SAN ANTONIOSHOE INC #19
151491SDI SCHERTZ3009 LTD
1758
1
5
BABC
O
C
K
R
O
A
D
165 L
T
D
79802HARTMANN LAND &CATTLE CO LTD ET AL
175821BABCOCK ROAD165 LTD
124875C F TDEVELOPMENTS LLC
Comal
County
Guadalupe
County
44515REALTEX HOLDINGS3009 LP
21849APG TEXAS2 LP
66778EAGLE TRICOUNTY LLC
139611FM 3009HORIZON L P
44538PROLOGISTEXAS I LP
66773PROLOGISTEXAS I LP
1
8
"
W
L
6
"
W
L
1 1/2" WL
12"
W
L
8"WL
8
"
W
L
12" WL
12" W
L
2" WL
2"WL
1
2
"
W
L
1" WL1" WL
12" WL
4" WL
6"
W
L
12"
W
L
2" WL
8"WL
6
"
W
L
12" WL
1
2
"
W
L
1" WL
8" WL
1
2
"
W
L
1
2
"
W
L
8" WL
8
"
W
L
1
2
"
W
L
12" WL
8
"
W
L
1
2
"
W
L
12" WL
3
/
4
"
W
L
8
"
W
L
12"
WL
2
"
W
L
6" WL
6" WL
2" WL
1
"
W
L
12" W
L
2" WL
6" WL 6"WL
6
"
W
L
1" WL
1
2
"
W
L
2 1/2
"
W
L
2
1
/
2
"
W
L
1" WL
8"WL
6
"
W
L
2"
W
L
6"
W
L
1
2
"
W
L
6
"
W
L
6" WL
1.2
5
W
L
1" WL
12" WL
3"
P
o
l
y
V
i
n
y
l
C
h
l
o
r
i
d
e
F
M
3
0
0
9
TRITON
IH 3
5
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
D
IH 3
5
N
CI
B
O
L
O
C
R
O
S
S
I
N
G
G
U
A
D
A
C
O
M
A
D
R
IH 35
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
D
IH 3
5
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
D
P
V
T
R
D
A
T
1
7
6
5
0
F
O
U
R
O
A
K
S
L
N
C
O
R
R
I
D
O
R
P
K
W
Y
CORRID
O
R
P
K
W
Y
IH 3
5
N
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
D
RIPP
S
-
K
R
E
U
S
L
E
R
IH 3
5
N
R
A
M
P
PVT RD
A
T
6
1
0
6
F
M
3
0
0
9
IH 35
N
R
A
M
P
FOUR O
A
K
S
L
N
IH 35
N
8"
P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
8" Du
c
t
i
l
e
I
r
o
n
8
"
P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
8
"
P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
8
"
P
V
C
S
D
R
3
5
8" P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
18"
PVC SD
R
26-ASTM
F
6
7
9
8
"
P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
8"
P
V
C
S
D
R
2
6
10
"
Un
d
e
t
e
r
m
i
n
e
d
8"
P
V
C
S
D
R
3
5
8" Undetermined
8
"
P
V
C
S
D
R
3
5
8" PVC S
D
R
3
5
8" Cl
a
y
8" PVC
SDR 35
12"
D
u
c
t
i
l
e
I
r
o
n
(70' RO
W
)
'
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Collector
A
(
T
R
I
-
C
O
U
N
T
Y
PKWY)
(
1
2
0
'
-
1
3
0
'
R
O
W
)
'
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
(
F
M
3
0
0
9
)
(70' RO
W
)
'
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
Collector
A
(FOUR
O
A
K
S
L
N
)
(90' RO
W
)
'
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Seconda
r
y
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
(EAST &
W
E
S
T
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
O
R
)
(70'
R
O
W
)
'
P
l
a
n
n
e
d
Com
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
o
r
A
(EA
S
T
&
W
E
S
T
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
O
R
)
(250
'
R
O
W
)
'
Freew
a
y
(IH 3
5
N
)
(1
2
0
'
-
1
3
0
'
R
O
W
)
'
P
r
i
n
c
i
p
a
l
A
r
t
e
r
i
a
l
(
F
M
3
0
0
9
)
Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community41 Inch = 200 FeetMSI SURFACES(PLVAR20230027)0 200 400 600 800100Feet
<all other values>
Freeway
Principal Arterial
Planned Principal Arterial
Secondary Arterial
Planned Secondary Arterial
Secondary Rural Arterial
Planned Secondary Rural Arterial
Residential Collector
Planned Residential Collector
Commercial Collector B
Planned Commercial Collector B
Commercial Collector A
Planned Commercial Collector A
<all other values>
Highways
Major Roads
Minor Roads
Other Cities
1"
2"
3"
4"
6"
8"
10"
12"
16"
18"
20"
24"
30"
36"
200' Buffer
Schertz Municipal Boundary
County Boundaries
U Hydrant
!P Manholes
Schertz Gravity
Schertz Pressure
Neighboring Gravity
Private Gravity
Private Pressure
To Whom it may concern:
Per City Ordinance, Only permitted 1 wall side on the front and side facade and less
than 250sf in size. Sec. 21.11.9. - Wall Signs
- Adjust Commercial Signage to allow appropriate signage for Industrial size buildings.
1. No.
a. The spirit and intent of the signage code is to establish standards that are appropriate to
the zoning districts.
i. Due to the industrial size of the building, we ask for a special waiver request to
be granted. It is unfair to hold all business storefront signage to the same
standard, as this building should not be measured in the same category as a
small strip center.
b. Allow effective and adequate sigs to communicate identification while preventing signs
from dominating the visual appearance of the area in which they are located. An 80 sq.
ft. & 60 Sq. Ft. Sign would hinder the full use and enjoyment of this location. A sign 80
square feet would not allow for proper commercial advertising as compared to other
signage in the same zoning district.
c. Protect and enhance the view of properties for public rights-of-way.
i. N/A
d. Avoid confusing or misleading a driver or obstructing necessary vision for traffic safety.
i. N/A
e. Insure that permitted signs do not become a hazard or nuisance.
i. N/A
f. Advance economic stability, enhancement, and preservation of property values.
i. N/A
g. Ensure and advance the positive impact and image of the town. These regulations are
designed to provide flexibility for the individual needs of a business identification for
general communication opportunities.
i. With this purpose, we ask a variance to be granted as a commercial facility of
this size can not and should not be held to the same signage standards as a
facility with only 1,000 square feet of space for store front.
2. Yes – Commercial property in question is 10,000+ in square footage and should not be held to
the sign standard as much smaller commercial locations. This would be considered an industrial
size building.
3. No – Applicant needs ample room for manufacturing and storage.
4. No – The signage requested only covers .08% of the storefront façade. In the code, there is a
reference to 10% of the building façade and we request that this standard be used when
measuring appropriate signage for this industrial commercial location.
Keeping the set code restrictions would deprive any business owner of a building this size. The long-term
adverse financial hardship placed on this business owner is much greater for the commercial marketing
and advertising granted to every business. Investing money into a sign is part of the functioning body of
any business. It is what places the business name into the flow and stream of commerce. To hinder the
size of this signage would prove to be harmful to many aspects of the functions of commercial business.
Per City Ordinance, Only permitted 1 wall side on the front and side facade and less
than 250sf in size. Sec. 21.11.9. - Wall Signs