The URL can be used to link to this page

01-16-2024 Agenda Packet MEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL January 16, 2024 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team AGENDA TUESDAY, JANUARY 16, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. Call to Order Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Westbrook) Proclamations: January 2024-School Board Recognition Month City Events and Announcements Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James/S. Gonzalez) Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S. Williams) Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R. Gutierrez) Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes. All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. January 16, 2024 City Council Agenda Page 1 Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember. 1.Resolution 24-R-04 - Approving the appointment of Police Reserve Officer Ryan McCosh to the Schertz Police Reserve Force. (S.Williams/J.Lowery) 2.Resolution 23-R-137 - Authorizing a lease program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply and expenditures with Doggett Freightliner of South Texas for replacement of the sewer vactor truck. (B.James/L.Busch/J.Moheit) 3.Resolution 24-R-05 - Consideration and/or action by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program application, and accept grants funds if awarded, from the awarding agency for replacement of the generator supplying secondary power to our Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) (Dispatch), Police Department, Emergency Medical Services, and the Fire Department. (S.Williams/G.Rodgers) 4.Ordinance 23-S-35 - Approving a request to rezone approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), known as Comal County Parcel ID 75458 and Guadalupe County Parcel ID 64005, generally located southeast of the IH 35 and Schwab Road intersection, City of Schertz, Comal County and Guadalupe County, Texas. Final Reading (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas) 5.Resolution 24-R-01 - Authorizing expenditures with Alamo Restorations, LLC. for the EMS kitchen remodel. (B.James/D.Hardin-Trussell/C.Lonsberry) Closed Session 6.The City Council will meet in closed session under Section 551.087 of the Texas Government Code, Deliberation Regarding Economic Development Negotiations; Closed Meeting. The governmental body is not required to conduct an open meeting (1) to discuss or deliberate regarding commercial or financial information that the governmental body has received from a business prospect that the governmental body seeks to have locate, stay, or expand in or near the territory of the governmental body and with which the governmental body is conducting economic development negotiations; or (2) to deliberate the offer of a financial or other incentive to a business prospect. Project:E-88 January 16, 2024 City Council Agenda Page 2 7.The City Council will meet in closed session under Section 551.074 of the Texas Government Code, Personnel Matters, to conduct the annual evaluation of the City Secretary, Ms. Sheila Edmondson. Reconvene into Regular Session 8.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item #6. 9.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item #7. Requests and Announcements Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council) Adjournment CERTIFICATION I, SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE11th DAY OF JANUARY 2024 AT 3:15 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE. SHEILA EDMONDSON I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON _____DAY OF _______________, 2024. TITLE: _________________________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210-619-1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion. January 16, 2024 City Council Agenda Page 3 COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS Mayor Gutierrez Audit Committee Board of Adjustments Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Senior Center Advisory Board-Alternate Councilmember Davis– Place 1 Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Main Street Committee - Chair Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Schertz Housing Authority Board Transportation Safety Advisory Commission TIRZ II Board Councilmember Watson-Place 2 Audit Committee Library Advisory Board Senior Center Advisory Board Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions-Alternate Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation-Alternate Councilmember Macaluso – Place 3 Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions Councilmember Gibson-Place 4 Councilmember Westbrook-Place 5 Councilmember Heyward – Place 6 Animal Advisory Commission Audit Committee Building and Standards Commission Economic Development Corporation - Alternate Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Interview Committee for Boards and Commissions-Chair Senior Center Advisory Board Councilmember Brown – Place 7 Economic Development Corporation Main Street Committee Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation - Alternate January 16, 2024 City Council Agenda Page 4 Agenda No. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:City Secretary Subject:Proclamations: January 2024-School Board Recognition Month Attachments Proclamation-2024 School Board Recognition “School Board Recognition Month 2024” WHEREAS, in the month of January 2024; Comal Independent, East Central Independent, Judson Independent, Marion Independent, Randolph Field Independent Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent and Randolph Field Independent School Districts in the City of Schertz, will celebrate School Board Recognition Month, to recognize the dedication and hard work of school board trustee members; and WHEREAS, school board members are strong advocates for public education and are responsible for communicating the needs of the schools to the public and the public’s expectations to the district; and WHEREAS, to create the educational vision for the students, school board members work closely with parents, educational professionals and other community leaders; and WHEREAS, school board members are committed to the mission of public schools in meeting the diverse educational needs of all children and empowering them to become competent and productive contributors to society; and NOW, THEREFORE, I, Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor of the City of Schertz, in recognition thereof, do hereby proclaim January 2024 to be ‘SCHOOL BOARD RECOGNITION MONTH’ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of the City of Schertz to be affixed this 16th day of January 2024. Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor Agenda No. 1. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:Police Department Subject:Resolution 24-R-04 - Approving the appointment of Police Reserve Officer Ryan McCosh to the Schertz Police Reserve Force. (S.Williams/J.Lowery) BACKGROUND An ordinance was approved on 9 January 2024 creating a City of Schertz Police Reserve Force. Resolution 24-R-04 will appoint Texas Peace Officer Ryan McCosh to the Schertz Police Reserve Force. Staff Recommends Council Approval Resolution. Attachments Resolution 24 R 04 No Attachment RESOLUTION 24-R-04 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, APPROVING THE APPOINTMENT OF A RESERVE PEACE OFFFICER PURSUANT TO SECTION 66-4 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 341.012; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the City of Schertz, Texas (“City”) is a Texas Home Rule Municipality acting under authority of its Charter and laws of the State of Texas; and WHEREAS, the City has previously adopted Section 66-4 of the Code of Ordinances, providing for the establishment of a reserve police force as authorized by Texas Government Code Section 341.012; and WHEREAS, the City has determined the need for appointment of reserve police officers to assist the regularly constituted police force in the active and efficient civil defense program in the City; and WHEREAS, the City may limit the size of the reserve force and authorize the chief of police to appoint reserve force members, subject to the approval of the City Council. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. The foregoing recitals are hereby found to be true and correct and are hereby adopted by the City Council and made a part hereof for all purposes as findings of fact. Section 2. That Texas Peace Officer Ryan McCosh is hereby appointed and officially designated as a member of the Schertz Police Department’s Police Reserve Unit for the City of Schertz, with all powers and duties provided for by law, for a term immediately upon Council approval and ending upon resignation or proper termination. Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8. This Resolution shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED, the___________ day of January 2024. CITY OF SCHERTZ _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Agenda No. 2. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:Human Resources Subject:Resolution 23-R-137 - Authorizing a lease program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply and expenditures with Doggett Freightliner of South Texas for replacement of the sewer vactor truck. (B.James/L.Busch/J.Moheit) BACKGROUND Replacement of the City’s current sewer vactor truck was approved in FY 23/24 budget. After research and due diligence, City staff has identified the Vactor 2100i combination sewer cleaner as the preferred replacement model. Additionally, staff believes that the best course of action is to lease the vehicle (with an option to buy). Kinloch Equipment & Supply offers a lease program called Mile After Mile, an option which provides several advantages to the City, including: Equipment built to the specifications and requirements as outlined in the accompanying proposal. A five (5) year bumper-to-bumper warranty for both the truck chassis and sewer cleaner All repairs & maintenance included (except rodder hose) Guaranteed minimum 95% equipment availability supported by free of charge loaner equipment in the event of protracted downtime. This program is designed to offer a low, fixed cost of operation and a correspondingly high level of equipment availability. The program is offered as a five (5) year lease with the choice of monthly or annual payments. Upon the conclusion of the five (5) year lease term, the City of Schertz has first option to purchase this equipment for $269,952. However, the City is under no obligation to exercise this option and can opt to return the equipment to Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. with no further financial obligation. Lease financing will be through Elite Finance Group. Though this program is offered by Kinloch Equipment & Supply, and a separate program agreement will be executed with Kinloch, the actual vehicle award will be made to Doggett Freightliner of South Texas, LLC, as only a franchise motor vehicle dealer may title, register, and plate new motor vehicles within the State of Texas. Doggett Freightliner of South Texas, LLC is the exclusive BuyBoard contract holder for the Freightliner 114SD chassis as offered through this program (BuyBoard Contact # 601-19). GOAL Approval of Resolution 23-R-137 to replace the City's sewer vac truck by entering into a program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply for the Mile After Mile Lease program and Doggett Freighliner of South Texas for the build and titling of the truck. COMMUNITY BENEFIT This truck is used for removal of sewer backup and other debris that gets caught up in our manholes and lift stations that are the main causes of most spills. In order to avoid spills and keep our pump stations running smoothly, this lease and maintenance agreement for a new Sewer Vactor Truck will allow for more efficient sewer maintenance of our facilities and decrease the down time we have experienced with our current aged equipment. This vehicle is vital to our wastewater operations at the City and entering into this 5-yr lease term will provide for the current need of the City as well as the flexibility to update in a more appropriate time to avoid the current impacts we have had to our operations with the old Vactor Truck. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 23-R-137 to replace the City's sewer vac truck by entering into a program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply for the Mile After Mile Lease program and Doggett Freighliner of South Texas for the build and titling of the truck. FISCAL IMPACT The total cost for the chassis and Vactor 2100i is $543,203. Depending on the financing option, it would be five (5) annual payments of $99,792 or sixty (60) monthly payments of $8,561. $675,000 was approved in the FY 23/24 budget for this replacement, but staff was able to identify a much more cost-effective solution in the proposed program. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 23-R-137. Attachments Resolution 23-R-137 with attachements RESOLUTION NO. 23-R-137 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO A LEASE PROGRAM AGREEMENT WITH KINLOCH EQUIPMENT & SUPPLY AND EXPENDITURES WITH DOGGETT FREIGHTLINER OF SOUTH TEXAS FOR REPLACEMENT OF THE SEWER VACTOR TRUCK AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, The City of Schertz (the “City”) approved the replacement of the sewer vactor truck in FY 23/24 budget; and WHEREAS, City Staff has identified the Vactor 2100i combination sewer cleaner as the preferred replacement model; and WHEREAS, City Staff has determined that a lease option provides the best value to the City as it includes provisions for bumper to bumper warranties, free repair and maintenance and free loaner equipment; and WHEREAS, City staff hereby recommends that the City Council authorize the lease program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply (Exhibit A) and expenditures with Doggett Freightliner of South Texas (Exhibit B) for the replacement of the sewer vactor truck; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a lease program agreement with Kinloch Equipment & Supply and expenditures with Doggett Freightliner of South Texas in an amount not-to-exceed $550,000 for the replacement of the sewer vactor truck. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this _________ day of ______________, 2024. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Ralph Gutierrez ATTEST: City Secretary, Sheila Edmondson (CITY SEAL) EXHIBIT A Mile After Mile Lease Program Agreement P.O. Box 4919 Pasadena, TX 77502 Tel: 713.473.6213 Fax: 713.473.7858 Toll Free: 800.231.6929 Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. Mile After Mile™ Proposal For The City of Schertz P.O. Box 4919 Pasadena, TX 77502 Tel: 713.473.6213 Fax: 713.473.7858 Toll Free: 800.231.6929 Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. As an alternative to the traditional equipment acquisition model, we offer a turnkey “cradle to grave” equipment acquisition and operation solution that achieves the best of both worlds…..high productivity and low cost of ownership and operation. We call this program Mile After Mile™. We are pleased to offer our proposal based on the Vactor 2100i combination sewer cleaner. Vactor is the North American market leader, enjoying just over 54% market share. Essentially, this is what this program offers:  Equipment built to the specifications and requirements as outlined in the accompanying proposal.  A five (5) year bumper-to-bumper warranty for both the truck chassis and sewer cleaner  All repairs & maintenance included (except rodder hose)  Guaranteed minimum 95% equipment availability supported by free of charge loaner equipment in the event of protracted downtime This again is designed to offer a low, fixed cost of operation and a correspondingly high level of equipment availability. This yields a lower cost of ownership per productive hour which I’ll explain later in this proposal. This program is offered as a five (5) year lease with your choice of monthly or annual payments, a balloon payment at the end of the term with a guaranteed repurchase amount from Kinloch Equipment & Supply equivalent to the amount of the balloon payment resulting in net zero out of pocket to the City of Schertz. AQUISTION OPTIONS Model Vactor 2100i Debris Body Capacity 12 Cubic Yards Water Tank Capacity 1,300 Gallons Vacuum System Roots 824 18” Positive Displacement Blower Boom RDB 1015 (10’ Telescopic & 15’ Extendable) Capital Cost $543,203. Mile After Mile™ Program Five (5) Year Bumper to Bumper Warranty Included in Payment Five (5) Year Repair & Maintenance Agreement Included in Payment Free Loaner Equipment Included in Payment Payment Schedule Five (5) Annual Payments of $99,792. OR Sixty (60) Monthly Payments of $8,561. Purchase Option Upon the conclusion of the five (5) year lease term, the City of Schertz has first option to purchase this equipment for $269,952. You are under no obligation to exercise this option and can opt to return the equipment to Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. with no further financial obligation. P.O. Box 4919 Pasadena, TX 77502 Tel: 713.473.6213 Fax: 713.473.7858 Toll Free: 800.231.6929 Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. COST PER PRODUCTIVE HOUR Assumptions:  8 hours in a normal single shift workday.  52 weeks in a year equals 2,080 normal work hours.  ~10 days per year (80 hours) of Federal holidays.  Net 2,000 normal work hours per year  Minimum of 95% guaranteed equipment availability Payment Frequency Cost Per Productive Hour Annual $52.52 Monthly $54.07 Prices quoted herein are in accordance with BuyBoard Contract # 601-19. This proposal is made as a matter of convenience. Any order desired to be placed in conjunction with this proposal must be made in favor of Doggett Freightliner of South Texas, LLC as only a franchise motor vehicle dealer may title, register, and plate new motor vehicles within the State of Texas. Doggett Freightliner of South Texas, LLC is the exclusive BuyBoard contract holder for the Freightliner 114SD chassis as offered in this proposal. Prices quoted herein are firm until 11/30/23. Sincerely, Daniel J. Federico Sales Manager Mile After Mile™ Program Agreement The intent of this agreement is to describe special terms and conditions for the City of Schertz to own and operate a Vactor 2100i combination sewer cleaner mounted on an Freightliner M-2 114SD Plus truck chassis with vendor maintenance. The proposal is written to ensure that equipment operated by you will provide the lowest total cost during its useful life. The proposal is supplemental to the Vactor 2100i proposal and accompanying configuration provided. This contractual agreement includes all preventative maintenance and repairs to both the body and chassis with noted exceptions. DEFINITIONS: The term "you" shall mean the City of Schertz. The term "KESI" shall mean Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc., the dealer who represents the manufacturer of the equipment being proposed. The term "Fleet Management" shall mean the City of Schertz Fleet Manager or his/her designated representative, wherein the equipment will be operated and maintained. The term "KESI Principal" shall mean the principal person or his/her designated representative of KESI, whom this contract shall apply. The term "normal workday" shall mean a day which falls on or between Monday and Friday of the calendar week, 52 weeks a year, excluding the City of Schertz holidays. A list of all the City of Schertz holidays shall be supplied to KESI from you upon award of this contract. The term "normal working hours" shall mean the time period of a normal workday when the City of Schertz’s main equipment shop and/or maintenance facility is normally open for operation. You shall supply KESI with this information upon awarding this contract. The term "in-service date" shall mean the date the City of Schertz places the unit in operation. The City of Schertz will notify the KESI Principal of the in-service date. The term "downtime" shall mean the period of time measured in normal workdays that the unit is unable or unsafe to perform those operations for which the unit was designed. 1. The maintenance contract period shall be a five (5) year term. 2. The training will require a minimum of one (1) day for operating and one (1) day for daily maintenance. 3. The City of Schertz is responsible for providing fuel, insurance, and operator for the mainline sewer inspection system. Original equipment items listed in this paragraph to be utilized and will be supplied at fleet pricing. 4. The City of Schertz is responsible for the daily maintenance of the sewer cleaner in accordance with instructions from KESI and/or the manufacturer. 5. KESI is responsible for the cost of parts and labor of the following: a) All preventative maintenance requirements for the chassis and body with the exception of daily maintenance. b) Vactor sewer cleaner components with the exception of jet rodder hose which is the City’s responsibility. c) All repairs to chassis and related components. Operator damage is not included. d) Repair of damage caused by the City of Schertz personnel is not covered by this agreement and must be repaired to the manufacturer’s original specifications within a reasonable time frame upon notification of damage. 6. KESI shall be fully responsible for transporting to and from your facility, at no cost to you for any repairs or maintenance required, if said repairs or maintenance cannot be completed at the City of Schertz’s site. 7. This proposal is based on total aggregate usage over a five (5) year term of not more than 10,000 engine hours. If 10,000 engine hours are reached prior to the five (5) year anniversary of the in- service date, the City of Schertz has the exclusive option to either:  Pay an hourly charge of $90 per hour for each hour in excess of 10,000 hours until the end of the five (5) year agreement to allow for the continuation of the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement. OR  Allow this agreement to lapse and immediately absolve both the City of Schertz and KESI of any further obligations as set forth in this agreement. 8. KESI shall guarantee that the equipment purchased under this contract will be available for operation at least 95% of normal workdays. KESI shall guarantee that the equipment purchased under this contract will not be out of service for more than five (5) consecutive normal workdays, nor more than five (5) normal workdays, in any 100 consecutive, normal workday period. 9. Equipment availability shall apply to equipment put out of service for any reason other than i.e., operator damage, theft, vandalism, accident, Acts of God, or incidents out of control of KESI which render the unit unable or unsafe to perform those operations for which the unit is designed. The City of Schertz supervising personnel, after inspection will determine in conjunction with a KESI Principal, if the unit was inoperable or unsafe and the cause of the downtime. Equipment availability shall not apply to equipment during routine maintenance. 10. The unit will be considered out of service starting the first normal workday, following KESI notification by the City of Schertz’s that the unit is inoperable or unsafe and requires repair. Therefore, the downtime clock will start at the beginning of the first normal workday, following such notification. The City of Schertz Fleet Manager will notify the KESI Principal during normal working hours of a unit that is out of service and requires repair. The unit will be considered in service (operational) starting the first normal workday following the completion of the repair and/or return of the repaired unit. Therefore, the downtime clock will stop at the beginning of the first normal day following the repair completion or return of the repaired unit. 11. Equipment availability or in-service percentage (uptime) will be computed by the City of Schertz at the end of each 100 consecutive, normal workday period, beginning from the in-service date, using downtime increments of normal workdays. The City of Schertz will use the following formula to compute equipment availability at the end of each 100 consecutive, normal workday period: Equipment Availability = [(100 Days - Downtime)/100 Days] x 100% NOTE: The term "Days" refers to normal workdays. The term "Downtime" refers to the total downtime accumulated during the 100 consecutive, normal workday period. 12. KESI will credit the City of Schertz a daily amount of $125.00 for each normal workday required to provide 95% availability in the event a functionally equivalent replacement unit is not available. 13. KESI will provide a relief unit should repair downtime be more than five (5) consecutive normal workdays. All costs associated with securing and delivering the relief unit shall be at KESI’s expense, with no cost to the City of Schertz. The relief unit must be functionally equivalent to its replacement. 14. This guarantee shall be in effect for a period of five (5) years. Time will be measured in calendar years from the in-service date and engine hours will be recorded on the electric, solid state hour meter provided with the unit. . The City of Schertz Kinloch Equipment & Supply, Inc. Name: ____________________ Name: Todd B. Kinloch Title: _____________________ Title: President Date: _____________________ Date: ________________________ Signature: _________________ Signature: ____________________ EXHIBIT B Truck Expenditures INV #: DATE: YEAR 2025 MILEAGE: MILEAGE: YEAR MILEAGE: YEAR TOTAL PAYOFF TO: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: FAX: GOOD UNTIL: QUOTED BY: SHOW LIEN TO:Body Type: ADDRESS:License Wt.: State Insp.: DATED: LIEN AMOUNT $License: DRAFT FOR $Title: DRAFT THRU: Transfer: ADDRESS: DATE 1701 Smith Rd. Bus: 512-389-0000 10/24/2023 Austin, Texas 78721 Fax: 512-389-2663 INVOICE / BUYER'S ORDER BUYER'S NAME TELEPHONE CITY OF SCHERTZ ADDRESS CITY STATE ZIP CODE 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY SCHERTZ TX 78154 MAKE MODEL/BODY VIN LICENSE PLATE FREIGHTLINER 114SD PLUS TBD A DOCUMENTARY FEE IS NOT AN OFFICIAL FEE. A DOCUMENTARY FEE IS NOTREQUIRED BY LAW, BUT MAY CHARGED TO BUYER FOR HANDLING DOCUMENTS BUY BOARD CONTRACT #601-19RELATING TO THE SALE. A DOCUMENTARYFEE MAY NOT EXCEED A REASONABLE CHASSIS SELLING PRICE $136,358.00 AMOUNT AGREED TO BY THE PARTIES. THIS NOTICE IS REQUIRED BY LAW.VACTOR 2100i $406,445.00 UN PAGO DOCUMENTAL NO ES UN CARGO OFFICIAL. LA LEYNO EXIGUE SE IMPONGA BUY BOARD FEE $400.00 UN CARGO DOCUMENTAL. PERO ESTE PODRIA COBRARSE A LOS COMPRADORES QUOTE # CPQ # 2023-69914POR EL MANEJO DE LA DOCUMENTACION QUOTE EXPIRES 11/24/2023EN RELACION CON LE VENTA. UN CARGODOCMENTAL NO PUEDI EXCEDER UNACANIDAD PAZONABLE ACORDADA PORLAS PARTES. ESTA NOTIFICACION SEEXIGUE POR LA LEY. Disclaimer of Warranties The above decribed vehicle sold by Freightliner of Ausitn is sold as is, without either express or implied warranties of any kind by Freightliner of Austin, including warranties of merchantability or fitness, and Buyer will bear the entire expense of repairing or correcting any defects that presently exist or that may occur in the vehicle, unless a writte warranty by, or service contract with Freightliner of Austin covering the describe vehicle is delivered to Buyer in conjunction with or within 90 days following the time of sale,but such vehicle or any of its component parts may be subject to warranty by the manufacuter thereof. MAKE MODEL/BODY VIN TRADE-IN MAKE MODEL/BODY VIN $543,203.00 (Trade Allowance) ($.00) TRADING DIFFERENCE $543,203.00 SALES TAX $0.00 DEALER'S INVENTORY TAX $0.00 LICENSE FEE $0.00 DOCUMENTARY FEE $0.00 FEDERAL EXCISE TAX $0.00 Total Balance Due $543,203.00 **The Dealer's Inventory Tax charge is intended to reimburse the dealer for ad valorem taxes on its motor vehicle inventory. The charge, which is paid by the Dealer to thecounty tax assessor-collector, is not a tax imposed on a consumer by the government, and is not required to be charged by the dealer to the consumer. TOTAL SALE PRICE $543,203.00 PAYOFF ON TRADE $0.00 EXT. WARRANTY $0.00 not been tampered with and are in the condition as originally manufactured, except for ordinary wear, unless so disclosed. Seller makes no representations, concerning fuel economy of the sale unit DOGGETT FREIGHTLINER OF SOUTH TEXAS LLC - AUSTIN and any information posted on the sale unit or contained in literature relating to the same reflect the results of tests performed, required or prescribed by government agency, upon which Seller has relied.It is expressly agreed to and understood by Buyer and Seller that is the event of a non-credit transaction, Seller retains a security interest in the purchased vehicle until such time as Buyer has paid the Seller for the vehicle. Buyer agrees to all the above listed charges. BUYER'S SIGNATURE: SELLER'S SIGNATURE: The information you see on the window form for this vehicle is part of this contract. Information on the window form overrides any contrary provisions on the contract of sale. La informacion que aparece en la ventanilla de este vehiculo forma parte de este contrato. La informacion contenida en el formulario de la ventanilla anula cualquier prevision que establezca lo contratio y quy aparezca en el contrato de venta . If a credit purchase, this is an offer to purchase only. Buyer offers to purchase vehicle on credit terms described herein and no contractual relationship is created. This order does not constitute an agreement for the extension of credit. Manufacturer/Distributor reserves the right to change the price of new vehicles to Seller without notice. In the event that the price to Seller of the new vehicle ordered hereunder is changed prior to delivery to Buyer, Buyer agrees and accepts that the cash delivered price will be changed accordingly. If the Buyer's used vehicle trade-in is not delivered to the Seller until delivery of the new vehicle, the trade-in will be reappraised at that time and Buyer agrees that such reappraised value shall determine the allowance, if any, made for the trade-in. Buyer agrees to deliver the original bill of sale and the title to an trade-in along with the delivery of the trade-in and further agrees to execute and all documents necessary or required to transfer legal title and ownership to Seller or its assigns. Buyer warrants the trade-in to be his property and free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except as otherwise noted herein. Buyer further warrants that the trade-in has not been declared rebuilt salvage, reconditioned, nonrrpairable, or flood damaged and that the emission systems have LESS DEPOSIT $0.00 Agenda No. 3. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:Fire Department Subject:Resolution 24-R-05 - Consideration and/or action by the City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program application, and accept grants funds if awarded, from the awarding agency for replacement of the generator supplying secondary power to our Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) (Dispatch), Police Department, Emergency Medical Services, and the Fire Department. (S.Williams/G.Rodgers) BACKGROUND Hazard Mitigation Grant Program (HMGP): 2023 Severe Winter Storm - DR # 4705 Eligible sub-applicants include local governments, state agencies, and private nonprofits if they own or operate a private nonprofit facility as defined in Section 102(11)(B) of the Stafford Act. Priorities and Considerations: Eligible jurisdictions within the declared counties for the disaster. Projects that address the principal hazards associated with the disaster. Projects that demonstrate the greatest community benefit including; High Benefit-Cost-Analysis (BCA) and verifiable population directly served or benefiting from the proposed projects. Projects that clearly link to the sub-applicants hazard mitigation plan. Projects that focus on multi-jurisdictional/regional/watershed levels. Selected projects will receive 75% federal cost share of the total project cost approved by FEMA. Sub-recipients are responsible for the remaining 25% GOAL Replace generator providing secondary power to buildings 6 (Police Department / Dispatch), 7 (EMS), and 8(Fire / Emergency Management). COMMUNITY BENEFIT During power outages are this projects provides continuity of operations for all public safety elements of our city. This includes the Public Safety Answering Point (PSAP) or our dispatch center, Emergency Medical Services, Fire Department, and the Office of Emergency Management who provide critical services to our residents and the City of Cibolo having a multi-jurisdictional effect resulting in the continued protection of life and property during power outages in the most efficient way possible. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Consideration and/or action by City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, approving a resolution authorizing the City Manager to submit a Hazard Mitigation Grant Program application if the ability to decline the award exists from the awarding agency for generator replacement providing secondary power to buildings 6, 7, and 8. FISCAL IMPACT The grant provides 75 % Federal Cost Share and requires 25 % Local Cost Share. The anticipated total costs for generator replacement is $325,000 so the local cost share amount would be approximately $81,250. If awarded, a budget adjustment will be brought to Council and the funds will be taken from reserves. RECOMMENDATION Approved a resolution authorizing this grant application. Attachments Resolution 24-R-05 No Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 24-R-05 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A GRANT APPLICATION TO FEMA FOR ASSISTANCE TO HAZARD MITIGATION GRANT PROGRAM TO PURCHASE A GENERATOR. WHEREAS, the Hazard Mitigation Grant Program allows eligible entities to file grants to fund projects that address hazards, demonstrate the greatest community benefit including high Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) and verifiable population directly served or benefiting from the proposed projects; and WHEREAS, the requesting agency will pay a 25% required grant match based on the actual cost of the vehicle received by that agency; and WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the “City”) has recommended that the City Council authorize the filing of a grant application with FEMA relating to vehicle purchased for Schertz Fire Department; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to apply to FEMA for a grant to fund this generator project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver a grant application with FEMA for the generator described, provided acceptance of the grant and funding of the City’s share of the cost of the equipment shall not require further approval by the City Council. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this ____ day of _______, 2024. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Agenda No. 4. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 23-S-35 - Approving a request to rezone approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), known as Comal County Parcel ID 75458 and Guadalupe County Parcel ID 64005, generally located southeast of the IH 35 and Schwab Road intersection, City of Schertz, Comal County and Guadalupe County, Texas. Final Reading (B.James/L.Wood/S.Haas) BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), to be known as the Schertz Gateway Planned Development District. On November 3rd, 2023 twenty-seven (27) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of the staff report, two (2) response in favor, zero (0) neutral, and fifty-eight (58) opposed have been received. A public hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express on December 20, 2023. As of noon on Friday, December 29, 2023,written opposition by the owners of well over 20% of the property in the 200' notice area was received. Thus, a 3/4 vote of the Council is required to approve this rezoning request. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on November 15, 2023. Members of the public voiced concerns about increased residential density, infrastructure, and traffic. The Planning and Zoning Commission meeting can be viewed on the City's YouTube site. There was also expressed the desire to keep the property zoned General Business District (GB).The concerns are also outlined in the attached Public Hearing Responses and Additional Public Input. After the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, and based on consideration of the comments provided in writing and during the public hearing, staff is proposing some changes to the PDD. First, that GB-2 uses not be allowed in Area I but that a Convenience Store w/Gas Pumps be allowed by right. Additionally, the parking for the multi-family in Area II be required per the standards in the UDC. The changes recommended by the Planning and Zoning Commission have also been incorporated in the attached PDD. GOAL The Schertz Gateway PDD will be a mixture of commercial and residential uses. The development will be divided into three (3) separate "Areas". The uses and dimensional and design requirements are listed below. Area I - Commercial/Retail Area I will be abutting the IH 35 access road as well as Schwab Road. Area I will have enhanced landscaping requirements. Trees will be planted at a larger caliper, from 2" DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) as required in the UDC to 3" DBH. Also, a 15-foot landscape buffer shall be provided adjacent to any public right of way. No masonry wall or fencing material shall be required adjacent to right of to any public right of way. No masonry wall or fencing material shall be required adjacent to right of way in Area I Acres: 19.61 Uses: General Business District (GB) as well as Convenience Stores with gas pumps. Dimensional and Design Requirements: General Business District (GB). Schertz Gateway Area I Dimensional Requirements Min. Lot Size Setback*Misc. Code Classification Area sf.Width sf.Depth sf.Front ft.Side ft.Rear ft.Max Ht.Max Cover GB General Business 10,000 100 100 25 25, 0**25, 0**120 80% *50 foot setback adjacent to IH 35 & 25 foot setback for other public right of way **Non-residential adjacent Area II - Multi-Family Residential Area II will be located on the eastern portion of the property between Area I to the north and Area III to the south. Area II will have enhanced landscaping requirements. Trees will be provided at 11 trees per acres as opposed to the UDC requirement of 9 trees per acre, also these trees will be planted at a larger caliper, from 2" DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) as required in the UDC to 3" DBH. Also, a 15-foot landscape buffer shall be provided adjacent to any public right of way. Area II is proposed ot be a denser style of mulit-family development as it is closer to the retail of Area I adn IH 35. As such, the proposed density being requested is up to 35 units per acre (vs 24) and the maximum height is 45' (vs 35'). Acres: 14.8 Uses: Multi-Family Residential District (R-4) Dimensional and Design Requirements: Multi-Family Residential District (R-4). Schertz Gateway Area II Dimensional Requirements Min. Lot Size Setback Misc. Code Classification Area sf.Width sf.Depth sf.Front ft.Side ft.Rear ft.Max Ht. Max Cover R-4 Multi-Family 10,000 100 100 25 10 20 45 75% a. Maximum density shall not exceed 35 units per acre, maximum unit count of 518 units. b. Off-street parking requirements shall be one and a half (1.5) per bedroom, plus an additional 5% or two (2)spaces per unit, plus an additional 5%. Area III - Residential/Low-Density Multi-Family Area III will be on the southern end of the property abutting the Cypress Point Subdivision. Area III will have enhanced landscaping requirements, including a 40-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the Cypress Point Subdivision. This will provide greater separation from the established single-family subdivision from the proposed development. Trees will be provided at 11 trees per acre as opposed to the UDC requirement of 9 trees per acre. Also, these trees will be planted at a larger caliper, from 2" DBH (Diameter at Breast Height) as required in the UDC to 3" DBH. Moreover, a 15-foot landscape buffer shall be provided adjacent to any public right of way. A six foot semi-open decorative fence may be provided adjacent to public right of way. The maximum density is limited to no more than 11 units per acre (vs 24). Acres: 29.92 Uses: Multi-Family Residential District (R-4) Dimensional and Design Requirements: Multi-Family Residential District (R-4). Schertz Gateway Area III Dimensional Requirements Min. Lot Size Setback Misc. Code Classification Area sf.Width sf.Depth sf.Front ft.Side ft.Rear ft.Max Ht.Max Cover R-4 Multi-Family 10,000 100 100 25 10 20 35 75% a. Maximum density shall not exceed 10 units per acre, maximum unit count of 299 units. b. Off-street parking requirements shall conform to city's Multi-Family Residential (R-4) requirements; 2 per unit plus additional 5%. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When analyzing Planned Development District applications, staff uses the criteria laid out in our Unified Development Code Section 21.5.10.F: 1. Whether the proposed PDD implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan. Area I of the proposed PDD is proposed for commercial use, adjacent to IH 35, and does conform with the stated Highway Commercial and Commercial Campus classifications on the Future Land Use Map. Area II and Area III are located in areas listed as Single Family Residential. The description of Single Family Residential in the Comprehensive Plan indicates that "the Single Family Residential use may include a mix of residential uses" not a mix of single family residential uses. As such some multi-family is consistent with this language. Further the Comprehensive Plan has a goal to "Achieve an efficient, diverse and balanced pattern of land uses within the City and the ETJ." and objective of providing "an appropriate mix of different land use types in suitable locations, densities and patterns consistent with the goals and objectives established in the Plan" which this would do in both Area II and Area III. Finally, the plan states that "Housing should be developed to meet all needs of the community in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy and accessibility. Commercial Retail and Office" Multifamily housing helps to meet this need, especially in light of the rapidly increased cost of housing that has been discussed over the past few years. For these reasons both areas conform with the land use classification of Single Family Residential. 2. Whether the proposed PDD promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City. As part of promoting health, safety and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. Given the IH 35 corridor adjacent to the subject property, the proposed commercial in Area I is more appropriate adjacent to the right of way; also multi-family provides a better transition from the right of way and commercial than single family detached lots. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change in zoning district classification and the standards applicable to such uses will be appropriate in the immediate area of the land to be reclassified. The site development standards in the UDC for commercial and multi-family development and the use of commercial and multifamily are appropriate and in fact seem to be the best in light of the significant variation in terms of zoning and land uses - single family residential, commercial and industrial. 4. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers or other public services and utilities to the are a. As the Comprehensive Plan notes, as development matures in undeveloped areas, higher densities should be considered. Given the location of the subject property along the IH 35 right of way and the proximity of development, the city's various plans and infrastructure projects assume higher intensity development in this area, this includes a planned East-West Connector and improvements to Schwab Road in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. To the best of staff's knowledge, this change does not conflict with the SCUCISD or Comal ISD school district's plans, including the 10-year campus forecasting. However, a public hearing notice was mailed to each school district along with surrounding property owners. 5. The extent to which the proposed PDD will result in a superior development than could be achieved through conventional zoning. The proposed PDD will have enhanced landscaping and tree planting requirements. Additionally, the scope and scale of the proposed development will see improvements to Schwab Road and Froboese Lane. The proposed development will also provide an opportunity for a mixture of uses within the same district, along with multifamily flexibility that differs from the base zoning district. 6. Whether all of the applicant's back taxed owed to the City have been paid in full (no application will receive final approval until all back taxes are paid in full). This does not impact consideration by City Council. 7. Whether other criteria are met, which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. The upcoming public hearing will provide a format in which City Council may hear other potential issues and public opinion. The council may deem relevant and important considerations to inform their decision. RECOMMENDATION The Engineering, Fire, Public Works, Parks, and Planning Departments have reviewed the proposed PDD standards and requirements with no objection. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval of the proposed zone change to Planned Development District as discussed. The Planning and Zoning Commission met on November 15, 2023, and made a recommendation of approval with a 5-1 vote with Chairman Outlaw voting nay. The approval had conditions that the base Multi-family Residential District (R-4) setbacks were to be used in Area III, along with a greater side building setback abutting the Cypress Point Subdivision. The Schertz City Council met on January 9, 2024 and approved Ordinance 23-S-35 as presented with a 7-0 vote. Attachments Ordinance 23-S-35 w attachments Aerial Exhibit Public Hearing Notice Map Public Hearing Responses Additional Public Input City Council Presentation Slides ORDINANCE NO. 23-S-35 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY REZ ONING APPROXIMATELY 65 ACRES OF LAND FROM GENERAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (GB) TO PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (PDD), KNOWN AS COMAL COUNTY PARCEL ID 75458 AND GUADALUPE COUNTY PARCEL ID 64005 GENERALLY LOCATED SOUTHEAST OF THE IH 35 AND SCHWAB ROAD INTERSECTION, CITY OF SCHERTZ, COMAL COUNTY AND GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS. WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD) located southeast of the IH 35 and Schwab Road intersection, and more specifically described in the Exhibit A attached herein (herein, the "Property") has been filed with the City; and WHEREAS, the City's Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. provides for certain criteria to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to City Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zone change (the "Criteria"); and WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning request is m conformance with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and WHEREAS, the proposed rezoning request is determined to meet the criteria outlined in the City's Unified Development Code Section 21.5.4.D. WHEREAS, on November 15, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve the requested rezoning Planned Development District (PDD) in accordance with the development standards set forth in Exhibit B attached herein; and WHEREAS, on January 9, 2024, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the requested zoning be approved as provided for herein. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Property as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, is hereby zoned Planned Development District (PDD) as described in the attached Exhibit B. Section 2. The Official Zoning Map of the City of Schertz, described and referred to in Article 2 of the Unified Development Code, shall be revised to reflect the above amendment. 1 Emily Delgado From:Abraham <abrahamdmarquez@yahoo.com> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 11:51 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Plan PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Commi ee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner), I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o4en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The4 of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and pu=ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a end mee ng or write le ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Abraham David Marquez MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5383 Kingswood Schertz TX 78108 Thank you, Abraham Marquez Sent from my iPhone 1 Emily Delgado From:Amber Shaw <amberdshaw00@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:33 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Rezoning of PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have 2 decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Put a really nice park with bike trails out there. Our children need somewhere to play. Stop thinking of the kickbacks and money lining your pockets and think about the residents that are already here. I understand Schertz is growing and growth means money, but make wise decisions about where things should go. Y’all can’t even fix our roads for goodness sake, so think about what else you want to add to this growing mess with no proper infrastructure. Thank you for your continued service and half-hearted support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Amber Shaw MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5260 Forest Oak, Schertz TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Anthony ONeal <oneala82@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:10 PM To:Brian James Subject:PLPDD20220214 Brian James, I, (Anthony O'Neal) currently live at 5299 Top Ridge Ln, Schertz, TX 78108 and I oppose to this project. Reason being is the current water pressure in this community fluctuate and with the new housing development it will not be able to support. Policing is another issue, current police force will be under staff in order support the community. Animal control will be another issue. I-35 is already congested, when it gets backed up, people already wonder through our community to find a short cut. We are already concerned for the safety our children. With addition growth this will increase of traffic flow through the community. Anthony O'Neal 5299 Top Ridge Ln, Schertz, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:berthadm@aol.com Sent:Sunday, November 12, 2023 11:13 AM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Re: PLPDD20220214 - Rezone Hearing In regard to the hearing on the 15th, I have attached a letter of my concerns and my opposement for the rezoning. I live on 5291 Top Ridge Ln and this impacts my family and I as well as the community. Regards, Bertha Murad 1 Emily Delgado From:The Cooper Family <thecoopers.0306@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 7:02 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Rezoning of PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) We are writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Bryan and Latoya Cooper 4838 Park Leaf Schertz, TX 78124 (210) 920-5584 1 Samuel Haas From:Cameron Hall <cchall3003@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 6:26 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Opposition to Rezoning Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Cameron Hall MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5043 Top Ridge Lane Schertz, TX 78108 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I- 35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, CARMELO VEGA MARTINEZ 5503 DEVONWOOD ST SCHERTZ, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Christopher Harlin <christopher.d.harlin@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 5:32 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James Subject:Schertz Gateway Rezoning Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to strongly oppose the proposed rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway," situated southeast of IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development poses significant drawbacks to the area, with nearly all residents in the adjacent neighborhoods expressing staunch opposition. The addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low-density multi-family housing is anticipated to result in traffic and safety issues, strain already overburdened schools, disrupt local wildlife habitat, exacerbate water pressure problems, and potentially decrease property values. One major concern revolves around traffic and pedestrian safety, as the existing traffic congestion on the I-35 access road and Schwab Road is already problematic, leading to accidents. The surge in local neighborhood traffic during peak hours, particularly during morning and evening rush periods, will further intensify these issues. This surge poses safety risks for children walking to buses in the mornings. The area's overall traffic is on the rise, with existing hazards such as potholes and litter likely to escalate with the proposed development, creating an unsafe environment for residents. The development also raises safety concerns due to the existing shortage of local police officers. Increasing the resident population and introducing commercial properties heightens the risk for residents, as demonstrated by recent incidents such as a high-speed chase in the area. The rise in crime, including car thefts and break-ins, further emphasizes the need to address these safety issues promptly. The schools in the area are already reported to be overcapacity, and approving multi-family dwellings without addressing this issue would strain school resources and compromise the safety of students. Additionally, the proposed development would impact local wildlife habitat, potentially affecting endangered species. The displacement of wildlife, such as deer, could lead to increased road hazards, accidents, and threats to human and wildlife health due to air pollution and litter. Water pressure issues in the area have been previously reported, and the proposed development threatens to exacerbate these problems, posing a significant risk to human health. Furthermore, the construction of multi-family apartments or condominiums is likely to lower property values, as it is inconsistent with the established character of the surrounding neighborhoods. I express disappointment in the limited notice provided to the community, with notices received only days before a meeting and during a time when the planning and zoning office was largely inaccessible. The rushed nature of this rezoning process, initiated in January 2023, raises concerns about transparency and community involvement. I strongly urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, a sentiment shared by many in the community who may not have had the opportunity to attend meetings or submit formal correspondence. Best Regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Christopher D. Harlin MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5712 Cypress Point, Schertz, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:fvelazquez29@att.net Sent:Saturday, November 11, 2023 12:13 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James Cc:'Martinez Velazquez NANNIE' Subject:RE: REZONE no. PLPDD20220214 letter dated 3 Nov 2023 Attachments:REZONE letter no PLPDD20220214 dated 3 Nov 2023.pdf To Who it may concern Reference is made to the Planning & Community le er dated 3 Nov 2023 with a no ce to public hearing for PLPDD20220214 for only the residents within 200 feet of the new REZONE area. Enclosed is our le er of disapproval regarding subject ac on. We are in strong disagreement and opposi on with the proposed rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. Pls contact the undersigned for any addi onal informa on. v/r Francisco Velazquez 4621 Falling Oak Schertz, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Holly Coin <rhc0607@icloud.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 3:59 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James Subject:Plan PLPDD20220214 Good A ernoon, I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li3er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li3er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and pu:ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi3ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a3end mee ng or write le3ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, Holly Coin Cypress Point 4630 Pecos Point Sent from my iPhone 1 Emily Delgado From:Monet1173 <scooby0195@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2023 12:18 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:PLPDD20220214, Schertz Gateway Dear Mr. Haas and Committee Members: We are writing this to express our vehement opposition to the proposed rezoning of the land from General Business District (GB) to the Planned Development District (PDD) which consists of approximately 65 acres of land located at approximately 200 feet from the Cypress Point subdivision, the area of southeast IH 35 and Schwab Road. There is not enough infrastructure to support this development and will be extremely detrimental to this area. Nearly all of the residents in our neighborhood and the surrounding communities are entirely opposed to the addition of multi-family residential to include residential/low density multi-family housing and commercial/retail. These densely populated types of developments produce traffic and safety issues that will amplify the current issues with the surrounding schools, which are currently over-capacity, not to mention the bus driver shortage issues we are already facing. Additionally, this will proliferate the existing water pressure issues in the area; not to mention completely destroying the local wildlife habitat. Adding multi-family developments to the area will proliferate these compounding issues and adversely impact our currently strained resources. Traffic, the safety of pedestrians, and our children are major areas of concern. These neighborhoods are situated right off of IH 35, which already causes increased traffic on the access road up and down the Schwab Road corridor. Accidents on the highway aggregate and increases the amount of vehicles around our communities, we often have drivers cutting and speeding through these neighborhoods looking for alternate routes, which again is a huge safety issue for not only our children but anyone walking or driving in the neighborhood. Furthermore, this upsurge in local neighborhood traffic exacerbates the already existing traffic issues during rush hours for the multiple surrounding communities. Currently, these morning rush hour traffic surges negatively impact the safety of our children, who are walking to and waiting on school buses. Traffic in our area continues to rise, and heavy traffic is now commonplace at times, which planners failed to anticipate. On top of this, the burgeoning traffic on these roads continues to increase hazards like the ever constant potholes. The addition of this type of development will only compound these problems, creating perilous, dangerous, not to mention costly road and vehicle repairs. We currently have multiple large master planned communities and developments in this area, by continuing to rezone this area for multi- family/commercial/retail developments will increase the strain not only on the infrastructure, but will also increase the traffic and safety issues. This type of development puts an extra burden on the local police force, increasing safety concerns considering that the police force is already short 12 officers. Increasing the number of residents, not to mention adding commercial property jeopardizes the safety of all residents. Crime has been increasingly prevalent. Most recently, a high-speed car chase ended in this area. We have already had occurrences of home invasions, car break-ins and thefts, and these issues are rapidly increasing. The population from these proposed types of developments will exceedingly increase police response times, creating extremely hazardous, not to mention, possibly life-threatening situations. There are not enough critical infrastructure resources to support these types of developments. Schools in our local area are already reported at being overcapacity, and the committee should not approve multi- family dwellings that creates or aggravates situations that cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. As previously mentioned, schools are already short bus drivers which has already caused our children to be late to school on numerous occasions but additionally has created dangerous situations of having children sit three across on bus seats in order to get them to school on the buses that are available. Rezoning to allow multi-family dwellings will elevate this situation from serious to critical. 2 There is wildlife living in the area and any development will not only destroy their habitat but causes safety concerns for children and pets when they are pushed into neighborhoods, especially considering there have already been reported sightings of potentially dangerous animals such as coyotes and bobcats in the area. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to the local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which needs to be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches, re-zoning threatens the wildlife on these ranches. Continuing to develop the land will not only increase the safety issues on the roads, as previously mentioned, but will also displace the deer in the area causing them to run out onto the roads and in/around surrounding communities leading to accidents. Pollution and litter will likely increase as well, leading to health and safety hazards not only for people living here but the wildlife as well. There have already been multiple complaints lodged with the city regarding the ever-present water pressure issues in the area of this proposed development. These issues arise continuously, especially during peak usage hours. The surrounding communities already have decreased access to water, adding multi-family developments will only put increased pressure on these systems and compound the existing issues residents are already experiencing. This creates a true human health and welfare risk and should be heavily weighed. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family dwelling units are built, not to mention overlooked revenue not only to the city but the county as well. In multi-family units, the only one responsible for paying taxes on that type of property is the property owner, not the numerous families that reside in each individual apartment/condominium. The county, city, and surrounding communities are losing out on the beneficial, essential funds generated from single family homes and the individual property owners that each contribute to our city’s much needed revenues. This means there is less money for health, safety, and welfare assistance such as fire and ambulance services, including crucial funding for our school districts. These tax funded services are detrimental to each and every community. In addition to these multi-family developments' lack of contributions to the annual financial budgets of the county and city, but the individuals and families that reside in these developments have no vested interest in the community, no pride in ownership since they are not individually paying property taxes. Schertz is touted as a "premier community" that promotes a family atmosphere where we can settle and build roots. The transient nature of multi- family developments are the antithesis of this acclaim. Basically it boils down to reaping all the benefits from our property taxes with zero contributions. This should be a concern for everyone, considering that this money helps fund not only public infrastructures but necessary education, health, and welfare services that support our communities. Re- zoning to approve multi-family developments puts the burden of the many on the few where the benefits, if any are few and far between. A bit clichéd but the cons in this case definitely outweigh the pros. It was a bit negligent to only personally inform a very small portion of our neighborhood about this proposed development as it impacts not only those that live within 200 feet of this proposed development but our entire neighborhood and surrounding communities. Speaking to our neighbors that did receive notices on November 6th and 7th, it does not appear that our community’s input or concerns were going to be considered, especially when the entire planning and zoning office was out observing Veterans Day from November 9th-11th and the public hearing is scheduled for the 15th. Considering that the application to rezone was submitted in January of this year, there was more than ample time for the committee to notify our communities. The timing of this hearing seems rushed, and the lack of opportunities for our communities to respond is concerning. This is extremely disappointing not only because we are taxpayers in this community but also your neighbors. We urge you not to approve this proposed rezoning. We may be the voice of one household, but from discussions with our neighbors, we know that this sentiment is shared by all. We don't live in a bubble so invariably any negative impact caused to one neighborhood tends to trickle out and affect surrounding neighborhoods and communities. Thank you for taking the time to read our concerns and oppositions to this detrimentally impacting rezoning proposal. We appreciate you for your continued service and support to our communities. Sincerely, James and Julie Forames 3 5720 Cypress Point Schertz, TX 78108 Get BlueMail for Android 1 Emily Delgado From:jbechtel@satx.rr.com Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 12:24 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Public Hearing for Nov 19th, 2023 Rezoning Attachments:HOA.pdf Dear Sir/Madam, We are opposed to the rezoning efforts PLPDD20220214. A ached is our no"ce of opposi"on and a le er explaining why. Sincerely, James & Mary Bechtel 4488 Winged Elm Schertz, TX 78108 LETTER MAILED OUT TO COMMUNITY XX James and Sylke Patton 5495 Devonwood Street 11/14/2023 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I- 35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: MY HOME ADDRESS IS: James and Sylke Patton 5495 Devonwood Street James Patton Sylke Patton Dear Planning &Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas,Senior Planner)- I am writing to express my strong support to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB)to Planned Development District (PDD),specifically titled "Schertz Gateway",generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road.This area has so far been undeveloped and I believe that developing this area with the proposed retail,multi and single family housing would be a great improvement to the area.Firstly,building more housing will expand the supply of homes within Schertz and as a result keep cost of living affordable here,I have seen first hand many of my friends and family struggle to afford living in communities that have shot down proposals for more housing and I do not want to see the same thing happen to my community as I am a strong believer that Schertz should be a community for everybody not just those rich few who can afford it.Secondly,the retail that is proposed would be a great revenue generator as it is right along one of the busiest highways in the country and I personally feel that Schertz has failed so far to really take advantage of the incredible location it has along I-35 and building retail here would be a great opportunity for the city to pull in extra money to improve the community as a whole.Lastly,I am a strong supporter of this zoning change because building multifamily housing would be a great way for Schertz to prevent or slow the approach of buildout.We have seen in many other communities such as Plano what happens when a city reaches buildout,Plano has since started to stagnate in population and it has caused many financial struggles for the city.I don't want to see the same thing happen to Schertz so I support this rezoning as it would help alleviate that problem Best Regards, James Bedwell 5497 Cypress Point,Schertz,TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:James Schoelman <jschoelman@ancira.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 3:28 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:PLPDD20220214 Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged I animatedly oppose the rezoning of 65 acres behind cypress point to build apartments. Regards, James Schoelman 6104 Covers Cove Schertz, Tx 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:jstag@satx.rr.com Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 11:31 AM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Help Attachments:Dear Planning.docx Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. I have attached a letter that addresses my concerns. Thank you for your consideration, James Staggenborg NOTE - This message contains an attachment that might contain a malicious payload. Schertz makes every effort to block transmission of dangerous attachments, but you as the recipient should always be cautious of receiving messages with attachments that you don't recognize or request from the sender. Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of IH35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Plus, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, James Staggenborg 4624 Falling Oak , Schertz, Tx 78108 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I- 35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: MY HOME ADDRESS IS: Jason and Petra Jackson 5512 Devonwood St Schertz, Tx 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Jenifer Matta <ilovemy2boyz@msn.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 3:48 PM To:Brian James Cc:planning@schertz.com Subject:Opposition to Rezoning for “Schertz Gateway” Dear Planning & Zoning Commi ee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o4en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The4 of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and pu=ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a end mee ng or write le ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, Jenifer Ma a MY FULL NAME IS: Jenifer Ma a MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5252 Forest Oak, Schertz, Tx 78108 Sent from my iPhone 1 Samuel Haas From:jenriquez15@satx.rr.com Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2023 3:59 PM To:planning@schertz.com Cc:jenriquez15@satx.rr.com Subject:PLPDD20220214)) I Jesus Enriquez owner of 4636 Split Oak Oppose the rezoning of said ma er, Jesus Enriquez 4636 Split Oak Schertz Texas 78108 210-313-9807 1 Samuel Haas From:Karen Macias <karenmacias1223@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 5:23 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Stong Opposition to REZONING Schertz Gateway Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner): I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. Let me be upfront with you. I moved to Schertz / Cibolo in 1995. I welcomed growth as nothing was here. The longer I live here the more I oppose the growth. I believe this development will be detrimental to the area. It is my understanding nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. I agree that traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. 2 Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning as I what happens in Schertz affects Cibolo residences. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Sincerely, Karen Macias 220 Kipper Ave Cibolo, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:STURGIS, KENNETH J Lt Col USAF AFPC AFPC/DPMOAC <kenneth.sturgis.1@us.af.mil> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 9:31 AM To:planning@schertz.com Cc:Kenneth Sturgis; brookemsturgis@gmail.com Subject:Opposition to Rezoning areas ivo Cypress Point HOA Dear Mr. Haas and Planning and Zoning Commi ee I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to the rezoning of the 65 acres in the vicinity of the Cypress Point neighborhood. This rezoning would convert 65 acres of General Business District property to Planned Development District. This proposed plan dras cally changes the landscape, func onality, and resource requirements of which the infrastructure in this area was developed for and is detrimental to the area because it doesn’t bring anything to the community but addi onal requirements on resources that are already constrained in this part of the city. The development of mul -family and residen al/low density mul -family (apartments) in this area will likely more than double the number of families already in this small area which places strain on the limited infrastructure currently in place. My specific concerns are lack of quality roadways, water supply, and most importantly access to schools and childcare. The roadways in this area are insignificant to support the amount of traffic currently in the area. Green valley, Shwab, and Eckert roads are already in horrible shape due to potholes, trash and damage from large trucks and construc on vehicles throughout the area. In addi onal they’re dark, narrow and all around dangerous and addi onal development will bring addi onal traffic which only exacerbates this already bad situa on. Water concerns are already an issue in this area. Currently in Cypress Point during weekday evenings and weekend a5ernoons water pressure decreases to the point where the faucets in our home become unusable. Doubling the number of homes in this region without increasing the size of the water supply pipes is a great cause for concern. Finally, schools in this area are already at max capacity. Increasing the number of families will place addi onal strain on the district. Currently, I drive past a new elementary school to get to our elementary school….it makes no sense. In addi on, we know of families in Schertz that have been on wai ng lists for over 6 months to get their children into daycare. These are dras c limita ons in infrastructure that must be addressed before developing land that was never meant to be u lized in that capacity. Recommend developers s ck to land zoned for residen al development as that land possess the infrastructure required to support it. If this land must be rezoned due to a lack of residen al zoned land, then the infrastructure concerns must be addressed prior to the property being zoned for that use, not a5erwards. Lastly, I will address one specific concern rela ng to the plans for Schertz Gateway and my specific property at 5175 Top Ridge Lane. The plans show a 200’ buffer zone around the en re project area, except where the project area lies along the back of my property line. I strongly oppose this plan as there exists no buffer from traffic, noise and specifically 35’ tall buildings that will tower over this en re neighborhood elimina ng any sense of privacy for both residents of Schertz Gateway and Cypress Point. If a buffer zone is planned for this project then there is no reason residents along Top Ridge Lane shouldn’t be afforded the same buffer space as everyone else impacted by this development. I recommend the developer’s plans be modified to incorporate the 200’ buffer where this project runs along proper es of Cypress Point HOA. I will a end Wednesday’s public hearing on this project but if you have any ques ons regarding my concerns above, feel free to give me a call on my mobile number below. Thank you for taking the me to hold this hearing and for taking the concerns of residents in the vicinity of this projects into considera on. Have a great day! v/r, 2 KENNETH J. STURGIS, Lt Col, USAF 5175 Top Ridge Ln, Schertz, TX 78108 Office: 210-565-4085 Mobile: 571-451-8580 1 Emily Delgado From:Lauren Hall <cypresspt.hoa.vp.secretary@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 9:01 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Opposition to Rezoning: Schertz Gateway Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition (as well as the Schertz cypress point HOAs) to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-familyhousing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevantin this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi- family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. 2 Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildliferunning into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Lauren Hall 830-515-3620 5043 Top Ridge Lane, Schertz, TX 78108 VICE PRESIDENT CYPRESS POINT HOA REPRESENTATIVE OF SCHERTZ CYPRESS POINT HOA Property ID NUMBER: 390082 1 Emily Delgado From:Lindy Wright <lindyann403@yahoo.com> Sent:Friday, November 10, 2023 8:42 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Concerns for Rezoning of PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents on the surrounding small farms/ranches and in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will create more problems in the area for crime, traffic and pollution than we already have and lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents.. There is an infix of high traffic on inadequate the feeder roads the City of Schertz Has already neglected the last 20 years to increasing size or control of traffic. As a local farmer my mother has been struck by a speeding truck while lawfully operating her tractor in the are. She could have been killed or seriously injured in addition to the tractor equipment being massively damaged. This summer while moving livestock from our farm at 24450 IH 35 N it took nearly and hour just to leave the drive way due the massive amounts of traffic on the access road due to road closures in IH 35 proper. Being unable to exit my property is not a one time happening - during rush hours and any time there is a crash vehicle traffic in this area has no regard for speed limits or maintaining their lane on a hill with limited visibility. Once you are able To get out of the property onto the access road you have to aggressively accelerate to avoid getting crashed into! The roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create additional safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and take no less than 30 minutes to respond to in progress vandalism and trespassing on private property due to working the car crashes on IH 35, FM 3009 and FM1103. Increasing the number of residents presents a very dangerous situation for the current citizens. The dumping animals, large furniture items and bulk trash on local roads such as Schwab Rd, Green Valley Road and Eckhardt Road as risen drastically in the last several years with the current growth in the area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase the already unacceptable police response times drastically and create a very risky situations. On our small farm several of our cattle and goats have already became sick and or died due to falling is washouts on our property from poorly designed drainage from adjoining communities recently built, eating poisonous plants tossed over our fence from the surrounding neighborhoods, plastic bags and other garbage blowing onto the property and getting stuck in the vegetation. Wildlife, both predatory and non-predatory have already been forced out of large properties in the area, such as Homestead, parklands and Cypress Point and have made this their home. Where will they go if forced out of this property, as any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. With several nearby farms and ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife and livestock cohabitation as the cattle, goats and other livestock will fall prey to the coyotes and bobcats who currently have much more land to hunt. Do you plan on hiring trappers to relocate the coyotes 2 and bobcats? Yes, both have been seen on this potential development property by me personally in the last six months. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents or coyote attacks as has been seen in other areas of the state with massive u controlled growth. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. Additionally these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9- 11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted by the developer for re-zoning in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. This is obviously an intentional attempt by the City is Schertz try to skirt around and force reasoning on citizens and property owners in the area. Unfortunately, this is not surprising or shocking as it seems the City of Schertz never has the best intrestrest of the local citizens or property owners in mind unless It pads the pockets of the City or a cooperation they are able to get a more tax revenue from. The family who has maintained and kept their property family owned the past 5-6 generations since the early 1800’s don’t provide the money or agenda for the City so they do not matter. It seems more and more like the City’s goal is to make it so hard for the small farm to continue to operate there no choice but sell out for development. When the City of Schertz force annexed us they didn’t provide any services Comal County was not already providing, they just gave us the unfortunate privilege of paying our hard earned money on additional taxes (City of Schertz Taxes) for nothing in return. Sadly, that has not changed in the last 20 years. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your consideration, MY FULL NAME IS: Lindy Ann Wright MY PROPERTY ADDRESS IS: 24550 IH 35 N New Braunfels TX 78132 (City Limits is Schertz) 1 Samuel Haas From:M Sizemore <margiesizemore@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 5:30 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Reasoning of PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi- family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my 2 neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Marjorie Sizemore MY HOME ADDRESS IS:5260 Forest Oak Schertz, TX. 1 Emily Delgado From:Matthew Bradsher <mattbradsher@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, November 10, 2023 5:57 PM To:Brian James Subject:Public hearing PLPDD20220214 Concern Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner), I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans' health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and 2 concerning. I urge you to disapprove of the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting do to my travel working for the federal Government or write letters and emails as I was just informed of this. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Respectfully, Matthew Bradsher 4481 Winged Elm Schertz, TX 78108 -- Matthew Bradsher XPlease do not proceed with this. You already know the negative impact it will have on the surrounding area. Matthew E. Wood 5487 Devonwood St. Schertz, TX. 78108 14 Nov 2023 1 Emily Delgado From:Melissa Reyes <mreyes5384@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, November 10, 2023 3:36 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Fwd: Rezoning by Cypress Point ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: Melissa Reyes <mreyes5384@gmail.com> Date: Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 9:22 PM Subject: Rezoning by Cypress Point To: <BJames@schertz.com> Good evening Mr James I am a homeowner in Cypress Point. I'm actually one of the initial homeowners in this area. I have seen a lot of development in my area which to date has caused decrease in water pressure, increase in traffic and an increase in mice and snakes due to all the development. Something I have adjusted too. However, now we are looking at more development and I am deeply concerned about drainage issues, road conditions especially if roads are opened into our subdivision. Decreased or no water pressure. Increased traffic. It has already started to get difficult leaving the subdivision as people use the access road when traffic is heavy with another development it will be impossible to get out. Please reconsider this rezoning. Thanks for listening to my concerns. Melissa Reyes 5384 Kingswood St Schertz Tx 78108. 1 Emily Delgado From:Mike Lee <mikemockerman@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 10:31 AM To:Ralph Gutierrez; Mark Davis; Michelle Watson; Jill Whittaker; Michael Dahle; David Scagliola; Allison Heyward; Tim Brown; planning@schertz.com; Samuel Haas Subject:Re zoning the parklands Dear Planning & Zoning Commi ee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o9en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The9 of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and pu?ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a end mee ng or write le ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, Michael Lee Mockerman Jr 5222 Nature Path (719)232-9587 Sent from my iPad 1 Emily Delgado From:Michelle Nail <ms.briez@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 2:40 PM To:Brian James Subject:Rezoning swabb road My name is Michelle Nail I live at 4539 Meadow Green in Schertz Texas in the Cypress point neighborhood I am against the rezoning in the area next to us due to the fact that we're not sure if there is enough required emergency support, the streets can't support it, traffic, water pressure is already low and I don't know what that would do to the apartments going up next to us, and the school in this are already packed. Please provide more research and look into how this would affect the existing neighborhood. There is already a new neighborhood going in behind us. Thank you for your time. Michelle Nail 706-664-5209 Scentsy Independent Consultant Https://nosehappy.scentsy.us 1 Emily Delgado From:Olivia Alvarado <oliez1968@outlook.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:00 PM To:bjames@schetz.com Cc:planning@schertz.com Subject:Schertz Re-Zoning Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Miguel A. Alvarado 4583 Scots Elm Schertz, Tx 78108 Cypress Point Subdivision Get Outlook for iOS 1 Emily Delgado From:Chelsea Rivas <cregan@4rinsurance.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:06 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Zoning commitee Attachments:20231109_160308.jpg Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MIGUEL Rivas 5379 kingwood st 1 Emily Delgado From:Sherri Thompson <thomps5kidz@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 8:37 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Proposed Rezoning Request: PLPDD20220214 November 9, 2023 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee; Samuel Haas, Senior Planner, We are writing to express our strong opposition to the rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District), specifically titled “Schertz Gateway,” generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing. We believe that this will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with already over-capacity schools, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams trying to get onto the access road of IHo-35 already exist from Schwab Road to Engel Road. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is already continuing to increase with continued building, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads are already hazardous enough with potholes and litter, and this development will further exacerbate the hazards that could lead to accidents and create unsafe situations for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This proposed development will create additional safety concerns for me. Already the local police are 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area with an individual fleeing police by running through back yards - including ours! Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing as it moves north along IH-35. High density housing will cause higher crime rates as well as drastically increase response times thus creating potentially dangerous situations. Schools in the area are already at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause the schools additional problems. Additionally, buses and drivers are in limited supply. There are already issues with children being late to school due to increased traffic and unsafely having to sit three across on the seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife (we frequently have visitors in our backyard) and has the potential to impact endangered plant and wildlife, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches, this rezoning threatens the wildlife on those ranches. Continuing to develop the land will increase safety issues on the roads (as noted above) as wildlife - such as deer - will run into the roads and surrounding communities potentially causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would also increase as well in these areas, threatening the health of both humans and wildlife. It is our understanding that multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding water pressure in the area of this proposed development. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours. Our neighborhoods already have decreased access to water and putting increased loads on these systems threatens the already large issues residents are currently experiencing. Other infrastructure needs are of concern as well: sewer systems, … Property values are likely to be affected if the multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multi-family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods already being developed in the area. We are disappointed that only households in the buffer zone were notified of this proposed change even though this would largely impact all communities in the surrounding area. These notices were sent on 11/3 but not received until 11/6 - 11/7. Top that off with the entire Planning 2 and Zoning office is out from 11/9-11/13. That leaves community residents with only two business days to voice their concerns in advance of the meeting. This rezoning application was submitted in January of this year. That is at least 10 months ago and now it is suddenly being rushed with very limited notice? This is very disappointing and concerning. It makes us wonder if you are trying to hide something. We believe that it is your responsibility to look out for the best interests of the current residents and not the developers. Thus, we urge you to NOT approve the proposed rezoning request PLPDD20220214. We know that this opinion is shared by many in our community who were not invited to express their opinion but would nonetheless be affected by this rezoning. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Regards, Nathan and Sherri Thompson 5287 Top Ridge Ln Schertz, TX 78108 Sherri Thompson "We are all under the obligation of making this world a happier place for our having lived in it," -George Albert Smith 1 Samuel Haas From:Ramona Owens <ramonamowens@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 7:16 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD Dear Planning & Zoning Commi ee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o9en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The9 of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and pu?ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a end mee ng or write le ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS:Ramona Owens MY HOME ADDRESS IS:953 Forest Ridge Parkway,Schertz,TX 78154 Sent from my iPad 1 Samuel Haas From:rgonzales6581 <rgonzales6581@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 7:32 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Rezoning of land next to Cypress Point I and my wife oppose the rezoning of the land next to Cypress Point. We live at 4504 Winged Elm and oppose the rezoning of this property for apartments. Homes, no problem. Apartments, NO WAY. Richard E and Maria Linda Gonzales Sent from my T-Mobile 4G LTE Device 1 Emily Delgado From:Richard Eads <cypresspt.hoa.president@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:48 PM To:Brian James Subject:Schertz Gateway Re-Zoning Attachments:Re-Zoning Schertz Gateway.docx The Cypress Point Board of Directors approved this document about re-zoning. Thanks Richard Eads 5523 Cypress Pt Schertz Tx NOTE - This message contains an attachment that might contain a malicious payload. Schertz makes every effort to block transmission of dangerous attachments, but you as the recipient should always be cautious of receiving messages with attachments that you don't recognize or request from the sender. Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with near by ranches these re - zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will drive and enhance the safety issues on the road above as displacing the wildlife will lead to them running into the roads and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue can occur at any time but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multi family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME: Richard Eads MY HOME ADDRESS: 5523 Cypress Point Schertz Texas I am President of the Cypress Point HOA and properties: 4577 Split Oak and 5055 Top Ridge Ln are properties owned by the HOA which I have authority to apply my disapproval to this re-zoning. 3 Sent from my iPhone 1 Samuel Haas From:Robert Nash <robertggnash@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 7:11 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Rezoning Request - PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (Including Samual Haas, Senior Planner) My name is Robert Nash and my wife and I just bought a house in the Parklands at 4851 Park Leaf, Marion, TX 78124. I am sending an email in regards to the rezoning request that would allow commercial/retail and multifamily residential into our area. I am writing to express my strong opposition to the rezoning of PLPDD20220214, approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development would be extremely detrimental to the neighborhoods in this area, and nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential and multi-family properties that will cause more problems than the already understaffed Schertz PD can properly protect and serve - who are already 12 officers short. Not only this, but the addition of such properties will increase traffic, cause more safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity and under-staffed, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase an already existing issue with low water pressure, and potentially lower the property value of the existing communities. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am aware of multiple complaints being sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. It is a consistent issue that increases during peak usage hours and the surrounding neighborhoods would not only have decreased access to water, but the development would put increased pressure on an already overwhelmed system. Lastly, schools in the area are already reported overcapacity, to the point that it is affecting the efficiency and success of the students attending, according to GreatSchools.org. The council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely sitting 3 to a seat across the bus seats. I am very disappointed, as are several of my neighbors, at the lack of communication on this issue and the ability to respond in an appropriately timely manner. All in all, I urge the disapproval of the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not only been denied the opportunity or appropriate time to hear about this issue, but who have also not managed to attend a meeting or write letters or emails. Very Respectfully, Robert G. Nash Retired Army Veteran 1 Samuel Haas From:Sandra L <sandralinerode@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2023 3:09 PM To:planning@schertz.com Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. 2 Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Sandra Linerode MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 6521 Crockett Cove, Schertz, TX 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:jstag@satx.rr.com Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 11:47 AM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:My thoughts on : Attachments:Dear Planning.docx Categories:Blue Category I have attached a letter with my thoughts on this zoning change. Thak you, Sandra Staggenborg NOTE - This message contains an attachment that might contain a malicious payload. Schertz makes every effort to block transmission of dangerous attachments, but you as the recipient should always be cautious of receiving messages with attachments that you don't recognize or request from the sender. Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of IH35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Plus, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, James Staggenborg 4624 Falling Oak , Schertz, Tx 78108 X This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Schertz Cypress Point HOA 11/10/2023 4577 Split Oak, Schertz, TX 78108 & 5055 Top Ridge Lane, Schertz, TX 78108 1 Samuel Haas From:Diane Schmidt <dianeschmidt67@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 8:33 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Oppose rezoning #PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down the Schwab Rd exit and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these rezonings threaten the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the 2 roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove this proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Scott & Diane Schmidt 5515 Cypress Point 1 Emily Delgado From:Shawn Smith <shawnsmith.notary@gmail.com> Sent:Friday, November 10, 2023 8:58 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Zoning Schertz Gateway Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Shawn D Smith 4646 Pecos Point Schertz TX 78108 Shawn D. Smith Mobile Notary Public 210-552-0439 Sent from my iPhone 1 Emily Delgado From:Sherri S <sherriasa@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, November 11, 2023 8:56 AM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James; Samuel Haas Subject:Rezoning Plan Dear Samuel Haas, Senior Planner and Schertz Planning and Zoning: I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Just yesterday a deer was killed by a driver in our neighborhood. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multi-family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is extremely disappointing and concerning. I strongly urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meetings or write letters and emails. Thank you for your support of our communities. Regards, Sherri Ansley 5217 Nature Path Schertz, TX 78154 210-789-3385 1 Emily Delgado From:Stephanie Chelar <fitnessbarbie@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 2:34 PM To:Brian James Subject:Cypress point My name is Stephanie Chelar and I live at 4535 Meadow Green in Schertz Texas in the Cypress point neighborhood I am against the rezoning in the area next to us due to the fact that we’re not sure if there’s enough fire or EMS support, the streets can’t support it, and water pressure is already low and I don’t know what that would do to the apartments going up next to us. Please provide more research and look into how this would affect the exis*ng neighborhood. Thank you Sent from my iPhone 1 Emily Delgado From:Stephanie Chelar <fitnessbarbie@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 10:09 AM To:planning@schertz.com Cc:Brian James Subject:Cypress point rezoning Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. My kindergartener comes home so late due to the lack of drivers and overfilled schools! Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no 2 indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Stephanie and Joseph Chelar MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 4535 Meadow Green, Schertz, TX 78108 -- Stephanie Chelar M.S., CPRP NSCA-CPT Zyia Active Independent Rep. Zyia Rep Website 1 Emily Delgado From:Steven Aune <csarteam.sa@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 9:10 AM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James; Tiffany Aune Subject:Opposition of PLPDD20220214 Good morning, I'm writing to you to express my sincere opposition to the rezoning of the property that borders Cypress Point that will include commercial/retail & multi-family residential (ex: apartments). While I can understand the need for additional development, rezoning this parcel will negatively impact the quality of life for the residents bordering this this project. The area is simply not prepared for the amount of new residents this development will bring. Traffic & Roads The stretch of I-35 adjacent to this parcel is already known for some of the most traffic congestion in the San Antonio metro area and the scene of frequent accidents. With the recent additions of QT and the continuing operations of Sysco and Amazon has already led to a significant increase in truck traffic and congestion along the frontage roads. South East of the parcel is bordered by Green Valley Road, a very narrow 2 way track that is already not sufficiently designed and maintained enough to accommodate the current amount of traffic. The roads that surround the project are in severe disrepair with potholes causing damage to motorist vehicles. The drastic increase in traffic will only exacerbate the deterioration of road surfaces. Schools Comal Creek Elementary was just opened and we as parents are just starting to see improvements in overcrowding. But, Danville Middle School, and Davenport High School are still reeling from the effects of overcrowding and understaffing. There's a severe shortage of bus drivers and this development will push the situation beyond critical. Infrastructure The existing municipal infrastructure has already proven to be challenging for the City to maintain. Water pressure is a constant issue and breaks in the mains have been an issue. This project will also likely require significant municipal investment to accommodate the influx of residents and business. These are tax dollars being spent on future residents. But, paid for by current property owners. How is that fair? Public Safety Beyond the increase of traffic related incidents that this development will cause, residents will also see an increase in crime. More people = more crime. This has been seen time and time again. With every new development we have seen increases in property crime. Vehiclular and residential burglaries will increase. Is there a plan in place to increase police budgets to account for this? Response times to the neighborhood are already a challenge due to this being on the edge of the jurisdiction. Homeless encounters and curbside drug use are already the norm in the area. The addition of more commercial properties and apartments will only increase the frequencies of these encounters. Property Values Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. Environment & Health Wildlife are routinely observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. 2 As a Husband, Father of 3, Resident, and TAXPAYER, I strongly urge you to disapprove of the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meetings or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best Regards, Steve Aune 5462 Cypress Point Schertz, TX 78108 C: 480-433-7471 EM: csarteam.sa@gmail.com Can Do! - U.S. Navy Seabee Motto 1 Emily Delgado From:Sukanya Nadkarni <sukanya.nadkarni@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, November 11, 2023 8:59 PM To:planning@schertz.com Cc:Brian James Subject:opposition of PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner), I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. As a homeowner, my biggest concern is that property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. If I wanted to live next to an apartment complex, I would have moved to San Antonio. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in this area. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. 2 This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, this re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on nearby ranches. Continuing to develop the land will exacerbate the safety issues on the roads noted above. Displacing the wildlife, such as deer, will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and human health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Please note, I am also very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. 3 I urge you to disapprove of the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meetings or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our great city. Kind regards, Sukanya Nadkarni Owner and Resident of: 5047 Top Ridge Lane Schertz, TX 781008 1 Samuel Haas From:Symone <uk_symone@yahoo.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 2:27 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:PLSPU20230206 Dear Mr. Haas and The City of Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission, I am wri ng concerning PLSPU20230206, the Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gasoline pumps at the intersec on of Schaefer Road and FM 1518 (11786 Schaefer Road, Schertz, TX 78154). As the mother of 2 young children living within 200 5 of the proposed gasoline pumps, I am strongly oppose to the City of Schertz gran ng this permit. The health risks of daily exposure to benzene and other toxins posed by living in close proximity to gasoline pumps are simply too grave. We are already exposed to jet fuels, air and noise pollutants coming from the JBSA flight line, however those concerns were present at the me of purchasing our home. Setback distance limits for construc ng gas sta ons adjacent to residen al homes don’t adequately account for toxic vapor fumes. The setback calcula ons generally assume about 0.1 lbs of fuel vapor emi@ed per 1,000 gallons of gasoline. Unfortunately, despite modern safety regula ons and equipment, observed evapora ve vapor losses are actually in the 1.4 to 1.7 lbs per 1,000 gallon range (over ten mes higher than es mated). Not surprisingly, numerous municipali es across the country have deemed even California’s 300 5 setback as woefully insufficient. Setbacks of 500 5 to 750 5 are becoming more common especially given that benzene is being detected well over 300 5 from gasoline dispensing facili es. No amount of benzene is safe. This proposed convenience store with gas pumps significantly jeopardizes the health of several families with children living within 200 5 of the proposed site. If we’re responsible enough to consider a 300 5 buffer, the number of impacted households increases more than twofold. Furthermore, the recently constructed Rose Garden Elementary School lies directly across the street and within 300 5 of the proposed pumps. Not only does this pose health risks to the students and faculty, but it also adds to the exis ng traffic conges on where numerous accidents have already transpired. The detrimental impacts of this proposal extend beyond the substancial health and safety risks that would burden this community. Na onally, convenience store holdups account for 6% of all robberies. This proposal stands to increase the risk of crime in very close proximity to an elementary school. The Willow Grove neighborhood, already forced to contend with the light pollu on and displeasing signage of the newly built Dollar General on the adjacent corner of Schaefer Road, would be further subjected to downward pressure on property values and damage its appeal as a safe, quiet neighborhood beside an elementary school. I urge our city planners to do be@er by its residents and take necessary measures to ensure this proposal is denied. There are ample alterna ve uses for this plot that could actually improve the lives of surrounding residents rather than disrupt and endanger them. Thank you for your me and efforts on this ma@er. Sincerely, Mrs. Symone Owens 10501 Pecan Branch Schertz, TX 78154 uk_symone@yahoo.com 1 Emily Delgado From:Ted Capra <tedcapra@gmail.com> Sent:Monday, November 13, 2023 8:53 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James Subject:Rezoning Opposition to PLPDD20220214 Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner); I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. According to 2020, FBI Data; homes and apartment complexes are the number 1 most common location for violent crimes. Apartment complexes can be particularly dangerous. A combination of numerous people living in close proximity, a high turnover rate, and little control of who comes in and out can lead to a dangerous mix. Moreover, tenants at these apartment complexes have less control over crime than those in residential homes. Apartment complexes are commercially owned properties, and thus, tenants are generally at the mercy of the property owner or manager to provide maintenance and security measures. Apartment complexes bring with them traffic, noise, and the potential for crime. Not to mention the fact that the buildings can become more and more of an eyesore as they age. All of those factors can negatively impact demand for houses near and immediately adjacent to the complex. KERA news in Dallas reports much of the violent crime in Dallas happens near apartment complexes. University of Arkansas at Little Rock conducted research and determined large apartment complexes appear to increase the vulnerability of properties within 1000 feet to violent crime. The University of Texas School of Law reports apartment complexes tend to have habitually high levels of violent crime. For example, at one apartment complex in Southeast Houston, 284 major crimes were recently reported in a single year—an average of one major crime every 1.3 days. Relator.com reported that neighborhoods with high renter concentrations account for a 13.8% drop in property value. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, LTC(R) Ted and Lisa Capra 5491 Devonwood St Schertz, Texas 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Terry Anglin <terry@terryanglin.com> Sent:Friday, November 10, 2023 4:06 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Brian James Subject:Zoning Notice by Cypress Point To Zoning Board, I would like to oppose the zoning change at this time for the property located next to Cypress Point. I believe we are already pushing the limits on utilities in the area along with the roads cannot handle the additional traffic this will bring. I understand progress but there has to be responsible growth. Until you have the roads, utilities, law enforcement and safety for children and residence in place I believe this needs to be rejected. I moved here 8.5 years ago and have watched the surrounding area be swallowed up so fast that it is making it a nightmare on the roads. I know government only truly cares about the money they put in your pockets but it is time to think of the people you already have in the area. I am not saying that more changes should be avoided in the long future but I don’t believe Schertz is ready around our area called Cypress Point Grow Responsibly should be the moto Terry Anglin 5724 Cypress Point Schertz, TX 78108 806-683-8545 1 Emily Delgado From:Vanessa Grant <vanessa@midciti.com> Sent:Tuesday, November 14, 2023 4:36 PM To:bjames@shertz.com; planning@schertz.com; ralphgutierrez@scherz.com Subject:We don’t want more apartments!!!!! Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi-family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re- zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are INCONSISTENT with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very DISAPPOINTED that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. 2 There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. If you really care about the quality of life in Schertz you will not allow this to happen! Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Vanessa GRANT MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 5488 Devonwood street Cibolo TX 78108 Phone 830-730-2152 -- MIDCITI REALTY 830-730-2152 http://www.homesforheroes.com/affiliate/vanessa-grant 1 Emily Delgado From:Wendi Potts <wendipottstx@gmail.com> Sent:Wednesday, November 15, 2023 10:09 AM To:planning@schertz.com Follow Up Flag:Follow up Flag Status:Flagged Dear Planning & Zoning Committee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am writing to express my strong opposition to rezoning of PLPDD20220214 approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically titled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addition of commercial/retail, multi-family residential, and residential/low density multi- family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already existing issues with water pressure in the area, and potentially lower the property values of the existing community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are often accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will disproportionately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during critical times for the existing multiple existing neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also negatively impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is continuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at times which may not have been anticipated. Additionally, the roads continue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and litter and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situation for residents. There are already multiple large master planned communities and developments and continuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situation for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. Theft of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response times drastically and create a very risky situation. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve multi-family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situation that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Additionally, bus drivers are limited, and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the continuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the potential to impact several endangered species, which should be investigated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Additionally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, continuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communities and causing accidents. Air pollution and litter would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Multiple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is proposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods have decreased access to water and putting increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if multi-family apartments or condominiums are built. Multifamily dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of notices were mailed even though this largely impacts the entire surrounding communities. There was no indication of where the notifications were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Additionally, these were sent on 11/3, not received until 11/6-11/7 and then the entire planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the meeting. This application was submitted in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited notice is very disappointing and 2 concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent meetings and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to attend meeting or write letters and emails. Thank you for your continued service and support of our communities. Best regards, Wendi Potts 2653 Gallant Fox Dr Schertz, Tx 78108 1 Emily Delgado From:Yadiri Tamez <yleon1014@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, November 9, 2023 4:40 PM To:Brian James; planning@schertz.com Subject:Cypress Point Rezoning Dear Planning & Zoning Commi ee (including Samuel Haas, Senior Planner) - I am wri ng to express my strong opposi on to rezoning of approximately 65 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Planned Development District (PDD), specifically tled "Schertz Gateway", generally located southeast to the IH 35 and Schwab Road. This development will be detrimental to the area, nearly all residents in the surrounding neighborhoods are completely opposed to the addi on of commercial/retail, mul -family residen al, and residen al/low density mul -family housing that will cause traffic and safety problems, create even more problems with schools that are already over-capacity, destroy local wildlife habitat, increase the already exis ng issues with water pressure in the area, and poten ally lower the property values of the exis ng community. Traffic and safety of pedestrians are major areas of concern. Traffic jams on the access road of I-35 already exist up and down Schwab and there are o4en accidents. The local neighborhood traffic will dispropor onately surge during morning and evening rush hours, causing traffic issues during cri cal mes for the exis ng mul ple exis ng neighborhoods. The traffic surge during morning rush hours will also nega vely impact safety for children, since students walk to buses in the mornings. In general, the area traffic is con nuing to increase, and heavy traffic is already common at mes which may not have been an cipated. Addi onally, the roads con nue to increase with traffic hazardous including potholes and li er and this development will further exacerbate that hazard that could lead to accidents and create an unsafe situa on for residents. There are already mul ple large master planned communi es and developments and con nuing to rezone will strain the area and increase traffic and safety risk. This development will create safety concerns as the local police are already 12 officers short and increasing the number of residents and adding commercial property presents a very dangerous situa on for residents. As recently as last year a high-speed chase ended in this area and crime has been very relevant in this area. The4 of cars and break-ins have been rapidly increasing. This will increase response mes dras cally and create a very risky situa on. Schools in the area are already reported at overcapacity, and the council should not approve mul -family dwellings that creates or exacerbates a situa on that will cause school concurrency to fail for this proposal and/or other approved plans. Addi onally, bus drivers are limited and we already have issues with children being late to school and unsafely having to sit 3 across on the bus seats. Wildlife has been observed in the area, and any development will destroy their habitat. Any planned development of the property should consider the con nuing impact to local wildlife habitat. The area has lots of wildlife and has the poten al to impact several endangered species, which should be inves gated by the appropriate agency prior to approving development. Addi onally, with nearby ranches these re-zoning threatens the ranch wildlife on these ranches. Lastly, con nuing to develop the land will enhance the safety issues on the roads noted above as displacing the wildlife such as deer will lead to wildlife running into the roads and surrounding communi es and causing accidents. Air pollu on and li er would likely increase as well in these areas and threaten wildlife and humans’ health. Mul ple complaints have been sent to the city regarding issues with water pressure in the area this development is purposed. This issue occurs around the clock but especially during peak usage hours the surrounding neighborhoods 2 have decreased access to water and pu=ng increased pressure on these systems threatens the already large issue residents are experiencing. This is a true human health risk and should be weighed heavily. Property values are likely to go down in the area if mul -family apartments or condominiums are built. Mul family dwellings are inconsistent with the neighborhoods developed in the area. I am very disappointed that only a limited number of no ces were mailed even though this largely impacts the en re surrounding communi es. There was no indica on of where the no fica ons were sent, but I suspect very few were delivered into our neighborhood. Addi onally, these were sent on 11/3, not received un l 11/6-11/7 and then the en re planning and zoning office was out of office 11/9-11/13 only leaving 2 business days for the community to voice concerns in advance of the mee ng. This applica on was submi ed in January 2023 and the fact that this rezoning is being rushed with very limited no ce is very disappoin ng and concerning. I urge you to disapprove the proposed rezoning, and from recent mee ngs and discussions with my neighbors, I know my opinions are shared by many who have not managed to a end mee ng or write le ers and emails. Thank you for your con nued service and support of our communi es. Best regards, MY FULL NAME IS: Yadiri & Charles Tamez MY HOME ADDRESS IS: 4601 Falling Oak, Schertz, TX 78108 SCHERTZ GATEWAY PROJECT A MATTER OF PERSPECTIVE: CHALLENGING INTERPRETATIONS IN PLANNING & ZONING. ZONING FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USE OF: “MIXED RESIDENTIAL USE” Richard Eads 5523 Cypress Pt Schertz Texas Phone 206-818-8748 Issued: 2024Prepared for: Schertz City Council Zoning & PlanningMisinterpretation of wording “Mix of Residential Uses” does not mean apartments, multi-family or Mixed Use Area in Single Family Residential areas: Zoning Code 21.5.5 explicitly defines a single-family residential area as consisting only of single-family detached dwellings. Not surprisingly, it does not include the term “mix of residential uses” within this classification. This omission implies that the zoning regulations strictly restrict the type of residential structures allowed in these areas, limiting them exclusively to single-family detached homes. The absence of the term “mix of residential uses” underscores the intention to maintain the homogeneity of single-family residential neighborhoods. COMP PLAN DEFINITION: The Planning and Zoning Staff are interpenetrating “Mix of Residential Uses” in the Single Family Residential comp plan definition solely as apartments which leads to confusion and a feeling of deception within the community. This is because the term “apartments” or “multi-residential” already has a clearly defined meaning in the UDC. By Planning and Zoning Staff limiting the concept of a “mix of residential uses” to just apartments, the City is overlooking other types of residential developments its actually intended to define such as mother-in-law suites. Applying the term “mix of residential uses” to include apartments, multi-family units and Mixed-Use Districts would essentially redefine the classifications of R-1, R-2, R-3, R-6, and R-7 as representing Single Family Residential, Apartments, and Multi-Family and Mixed-Uses District housing types all in one. This would introduce a significant change in how residential areas are categorized and regulated, potentially impacting zoning regulations, land use planning, and overall urban development strategies. Such a broad interpretation of the term would require careful consideration of the im- plications and potential consequences for communities and local governments. There would be no need for Apartments/Multi-Family or Mixed-Use Developments to have there own definition in the Zoning Ordinance. When the City of Schertz intentionally creates ambiguity in the definitions of its or- dinances, it raises concerns about its transparency and true intentions. By leaving room for wide interpretation between the Comp plan and City Zoning Ordinance definitions, the city can manipulate the application of these ordinances to suit their needs, potentially leading to deceptive practices. This lack of clarity not only un- dermines the trust of the community but also makes it difficult for residents to fully understand such development plans. Clear and transparent definitions are crucial to ensure that the city’s intentions are genuine and that residents can trust in the fair- ness and consistency of the Cities leadership. Consistency between a city’s Comprehensive Plan and its zoning code ordinance defini- tions is crucial for effective urban planning. It is important that the language used in the Comprehensive Plan accurately reflects the current zoning code definitions. For example, if a Single Family Residential comp plan area is described in a way that could include apartments, it can create confusion and lead to mistrust. This inconsistency can result in unintended consequences and undermine the integrity of the city’s planning efforts. Therefore, it is essential to ensure that the wording in the Comprehensive Plan aligns with the definitions and intentions of the zoning code ordinance to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. Clear and Understandable City Documents for Informed Decision-making Creating clear and understandable documents, rules, and ordinances is crucial for cities to provide their residents with the necessary information when deciding where to live. By pre- senting this information in a clear and concise manner, cities can empower their residents to make informed decisions that align with their needs and preferences. Clear zoning can outline important aspects such as zoning plans, enabling residents to understand the city’s zoning areas and how they may impact their daily lives. This transparency fosters trust and confidence in the city’s governance, ultimately contributing to a better quality of life for its residents. The wording “Mix of Residential Uses” in the Single Family Residential definition should not be interpreted as some other type of use such as apartments. It simply means that within the designated single family residential area, there may be a combination of different types of single family homes, such as detached houses. This does not include apartments or multi-family dwellings, mixed-use development, as those fall under a different classifica- tion. It is important to understand the specific definitions and classifications used in plan- ning and zoning to accurately interpret and apply them. SCHERTZ GATEWAYPDD DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL TO, 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz Tx SCHERTZ CITY COUNCIL Glen Outlaw Said: THIS PROJECT IS EXACTLY WHAT CITY COUNCIL WAS AGAINST. THIS PROJECT IS USING THE PDD TO GET AROUND UDC. Planned Development District (PDD) Applicability. The purpose of the Planned Development District is to promote and encourage innovative development that is sen- sitive to surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. If this necessitates varying from available zoning districts, the proposed development should demonstrate community benefits. A PDD should not be used to deviate from the provisions of the UDC in a way that contradicts its intent. This re-zoning request is just to avoid the UDC and maximize population density and profits. PLPDD20220214 Content General Business (GB) Criteria for Approval Zoning Commissioners Community Input Why have Comp Plans Parking PDD MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT REGIONAL COSTS MAPS GB is Intended to provide suitable areas for the development of non-residential uses which offer a wide variety of retail and service establishments that are generally oriented toward serving the overall needs of the entire community. These businesses are usually located on appropriately designed and attractively landscaped sites and along principal transportation corridors. The developer, Ocotillo Capital Partners had knowledge of the zoning regulations designating this area for general business purposes. To access services in Schertz or New Braunfels, it requires a minimum travel time of 15 minutes from the Homestead, Cypress Point, and Parklands areas. GENERAL BUSINESS The Schertz Gateway Project area has been classified as General Business, and the residents of Schertz currently have no interest in altering this zoning designation. The implementation of a general business development in this vicinity has the potential to enhance the overall quality of life for the homeowners residing in this area. Given its distance from the main city area, it would be advisable to consider introducing certain services to cater to the needs of this community. Deviating from the recommended Single Family Residential zoning outlined in the Comprehensive Plan is unnecessary and unwanted. The current zoning already designates this area for Single Family Residential and includes a supporting general business area. The intersection of Frontage Rd. and Schwab Rd. offers a prime location to boost local businesses in the area. Additionally, the City’s plans to expand along Eckhardt Rd. for zoned apartments could bring benefits for GB beyond the existing residents. Home furnishing stores, art galleries, museums, beauty salons, barber shops, building material and hardware stores, and more can utilize this area. Additionally, as the city grows, it could also serve as a location for a combined fire and police station. This would help decrease response time for fire emergencies and provide a space for police officers to carry out administrative tasks, detain prisoners, conduct community outreach programs, refuel vehicles, and more. The potential for a General Business development to diverge from the typical chain stores commonly found at I35 exits is significant. Given its strategic location near a highway and major transportation routes, this area has the potential to generate additional tax revenue from travelers commuting between Schertz, San Antonio, New Braunfels, and Austin. 98% of residence in area want it to remain General Business. SERVICES NEEDED ZONING AND PLANNINGNEED TO KEEP GB IN THIS AREA Encouraging residents to travel to New Braunfels or Schertz for general services will further burden the taxed traffic system, leading to increased congestion and poten- tial transportation issues. Based on the attendance at the Zoning Commission meeting and the responses re- ceived by mail, it is evident that 98% of the residents you serve are in favor of keeping the area as a general business zone. Gateway Criteria for Approval - 21.5.10. F 1: Does the PDD implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan? NO 21.5.5- Apartments: should not be located in areas where they would increase traffic through single-family neighborhoods. This PDD is attempting to circumvent zoning rules. 2: Does the PDD promote health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City. NO The increase in vehicular traffic along Froboese and Eckhardt will disrupt the general welfare of the residents. When traffic is congested, residential streets like Cypress Point are used as shortcuts, further exacerbating the problem. Additionally, the traffic at Frontage Rd and Schwab will lead to longer wait times and increased congestion. There is no intention of improving area roads to ac- commodate this increase in traffic. Furthermore, the presence of over 2000 additional residents in this locality will place an excessive strain on the City’s services, necessitating the reliance on neighboring cities for assistance through mutual aid. 3: Does the extent to which the proposed PDD will result in a superior development than could be achieved through conventional zoning. This PDD serves as a means to circumvent the UDC and create extensive apartment complexes, paving the way for the transformation of Frontage Rd into another San Antonio-like apartment area. The residential neighborhoods along Cypress Point, Kingswood St, Winged Elm, Forest Oak, and Falling Oak may experience a potential rise in traffic flow, indicated by the color red. RICHARD BRAUD NOV 15TH 2023: “I HAVE BEEN SITTING ON THIS COMMISSION FOR I DON’T KNOW 12 YEARS. I HAVE BEEN LIVING IN SCHERTZ FOR 25 YEARS. AND JUST ABOUT ALL YOUR COMPLAINTS WERE THE SAME COMPLAINTS THAT HAPPENED AT CYPRESS POINT, HOMESTEAD, PARKLANDS, RYAN VALLEY, CROSSVINE, MISTY OAKS AND JUST ABOUT EVERY DEVELOPMENT THAT’S HAS BEEN BUILT IN THE LAST 25YRS OR SO. ITS THE EXACT SAME COMMENTS. I HEAR YOU BECAUSE I HAVE A GENERAL BUSINESS LOT BEHIND MY HOUSE. I AM NOT TO EXCITED ABOUT IT, BUT ITS THERE. AND I BOUGHT MY HOUSE KNOWING THAT. SO I AM GOING TO HAVE TO LIVE WITH WHATEVER POPS UP BEHIND MY HOUSE. BUT I HEAR YOUR CONCERNS BUT THEY HAPPEN ON EVERY DEVELOPMENT. YOU ALL MENTIONED YOU MOVED TO SCHERTZ BECAUSE YOU LIKED IT HERE. YOUR HOUSE WASN’T HERE AT ONE POINT.... DEVEL- OPMENTS LIKE THIS MIGHT NOT BE IDEAL. BUT IF THIS WASN’T SCHERTZ CITY LIMITS AND IT WAS COMAL COUNTY. YOU HAVE NO SAY WHATS SO EVER. NEITHER DOES THE CITY. THE COUNTY HAS NO ZONING LAWS. YOUR FORTUNATE THE CITY IS HERE TO HELP GUIDE DEVELOPMENT. WE HAVE HEARD IT ALL BEFORE AND DEVELOPMENT RESOLVES THOSE KINDS OF PROBLEMS. “ Gateway ZONING COMMISSIONERS GLEN OUTLAW ZONING CHAIR NOV 15TH 2023: “DEVELOPERS ATTEMPT TO MAXIMIZE THERE PROJECT INVESTMENT BY USING THE PDD TO GET AROUND UDC” CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP ON PDD - THIS PROJECT IS EXACTLY WHAT THEY WERE AGAINST. THIS PROJECT IS USING THE PDD TO GET AROUND UDC. Where is the representation and why have public hearings ? The Commissioners and City express their indifference towards the opinions and de- sires of the people of the community, stating that they have already heard it all before. It appears deceptive to hold a public hearing that ultimately carries no significance or influence. RICHARD BRAUD SAID HE MOVED TO HIS HOME KNOWING THE PROPERTY BEHIND HIM WAS ZONED FOR GENERAL BUSINESS. THESE AREA RESIDENCE ALSO MOVED IN KNOWING IT WAS ZONED FOR GENERAL BUSINESS WITH A PLAN FOR SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL. City staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission have the duty to evaluate if the development aligns with the City’s goals and objectives as outlined in the City’s Plan. This project does not. This PDD doesn’t keep in line with the goals in this area for General Business or Single Family Residential. Gateway If, for a period of 12 years, a signifi- cant number of individuals have con- sistently expressed their opposition to the construction of apartments in Schertz during public zoning com- mission meetings, it raises concerns about the motives behind the contin- ued approval of such projects by the Zoning Commission and City Coun- cil. This situation could be perceived as either negligent or deceptive, as it suggests a lack of consideration for the community’s input. If the Com- mission and Council show no genu- ine interest in the opinions and con- cerns of their constituents, the public hearing becomes nothing more than a superficial display. The zoning commissioners appear to think that the developer holds more influence over the comprehensive plan than the city does. COMMUNITY INPUT ZONE COMMISSIONERS DISMISSIVE COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN The Comprehensive Land Plan, as amended, serves as the community’s blueprint for future development by providing guidelines for the appropriate location, concentration, and intensity of future development by land use categories. Any person, firm, or corporation who shall violate any of the provisions of this UDC, or fails to comply therewith, or who shall violate or fail to comply with any order or regulation made hereunder is deemed guilty of a misdemenaor Area III to dense in Zoing Commission Chairs opinion during the zoning meeting. City Council SECTION: 21.4.3 Posted Notice Commission Chair 21.1.8 Violations and penalties PROJECTS Ocotillo Captial Partners The City Council expressed their disapproval of using the PDD as a loop- hole to bypass the UDC, and this project precisely does that. It utilizes the PDD to alter the height restriction from 35ft to 45ft, while also allowing a mere 5ft setback for what are essentially apartments disguised as town homes. Moreover, it fails to allocate space for a sidewalk along Froboses and presents additional concerns. POSTED NOTICE for zoning change shall be placed in area 11 days prior to the scheduled public hearing and shall remain posted during the course of the public hearing, until such time that final action as been taken on the permit application. The notices were removed after the Zoning Commission hearing and are still down as of 1/1/2024 violating city ordinances. The City exerts its jurisdiction and for which one or more permits are re- quired to initiate, continue, or complete the endeavor. Gateway COMPREHENSIVE LAND PLAN Why Should Communities Plan When a city such as Schertz engages in long-range planning, it has decided to take some measure of control over its destiny rather than standing still and reacting to change. In Schertz’s case, the results of previous planning efforts are reflected in very tangible accom- plishments across the community that was achieved through dedication and commitment to a shared vision. The planning process involves major community decisions about how much and where the City will grow, what the nature of that growth will be, and whether the community can afford to provide the necessary public services and facilities to support this growth. Neglecting to consider these decisions renders the expenditure of time and money on them futile. It is misleading to inform the community that you have a plan, only to deviate from it at every opportunity. In 2001, the City Council established a set of zones that outline the expectations for all residents of the city. These zones reflect the shared vision of local leaders and residents to create a community that is attractive for living, working, and raising a family. INCREASED TRAFFIC FLOW Sec. 21.14.7. Traffic Impact Analysis Application Requirements. Every application for development within the City or its ETJ shall be accompanied by a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) Determination Form provided in the Development Manual. The TIA Determination Form shall be utilized to determine if a TIA is required. HAS SUCH TIA BEEN SUBMITTED ? Gateway Mid-Day Traffic Schwab / Frontage DEC 2023 PARKING AREA II At the public hearing the developer representative said there would be 1 parking space per bedroom. Without the Planned Development District (PDD), each unit in Area II would need two parking spaces. This is why they are attempting to circumvent the Unified Development Code (UDC). If only 518 spaces are allocated, it is logical to anticipate the need for an additional 518 spaces for the second vehicle, which is commonly owned by most fami- lies in Texas. 500 additional cars would need 4,000ft or 1 mile of street parking. Parking for 299 apartments in Area III has not been taken into consid- eration. The only way to access Area III from there would be either through Froboese to Eckhardt and the residential neighborhood or Schwab Road. AREA III PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT The purpose of the PDD is to promote and encourage innovation development that is sensitive to the surrounding land uses and to the natural environment. Sec. 21.5.10 Planning and Zoning may be in ignoring this section as it lacks innovation, disregards the impact on the surrounding neighborhood (with no plans to mitigate increased traffic), and requires the redirection of natural water sources to the designated area. The proposed development differs from the existing zoning districts (GB) and/or Comp Plan Single Family Residential. The developer has not provided evidence of any community benefits associated with this project. It seems that their main objec- tive is to maximize the number of apartments in a single area by utilizing the PDD. It appears that the Zoning and Planning department is supporting this approach. NEEDED OR SCAM? Schertz Gateway lacks innovation and is nothing more than a typical apartment complex that can be found anywhere. 21.5.10A PDD SHOULD NOT BE USED TO DEVIATE FROM THE PROVISIONS OF THE UDC IN A WAY THAT CONTRADICTS ITS INTENT. Gateway Apartments shall be not higher than 35ft. Parking spaces per unit is minium of 2. Apartments : The maximum density shall be twenty-four (24) units per acre. Apartment/Multi-Family Residential Districts should not be located in areas where they would increase traffic through single- family neighborhoods and should be located adjacent to arterial streets with sufficient capacity to carry the increased traffic generated. Multi-family developments are suitable buffers between single- family districts and commercial uses. Multi-family districts should be buffered from non-residential land uses and from pollution sources and environmental hazards. Twenty percent (20%) of the total platted area shall be provided as common, usable open space. The UDC mandates the presence of buffers between apartments and general busi- ness areas. However, this project’s PDD aims to remove this zone, thereby bypassing UCD regulations. What Is a Mixed Use Building in Texas and across the country: A mixed use building is one that is partly occupied by residential uses and partly occupied by com- mercial and/or community facility uses. In a nutshell, a mixed use building is a single building hous- ing three or more revenue-producing ventures such as housing, office, commercial, recreational or industrial spaces. For example, it is common for Texas mixed use buildings to include retail shops and restaurants on the first floor and offices and residential areas on the upper floors. MIXED USE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT PDD Cost of Living During the presentation, the zoning staff highlighted the rise in home prices and suggested that building apartments would address the need for affordable housing. However, this assertion is not based on factual information. Schertz currently has an excess of unoccupied residential properties, including both homes and apart- ments, in the local area and nearby communities. The price for renting these apartments is likely to be as high as the monthly mortgage payments. The present monthly payment for a 30-year fixed mortgage on a $400,000 home purchase is approxi- mately $2,049 with an interest rate of 6.625%. OCOTILLO CAPITAL PARTNERS THEIR APARTMENTS IN AUSTIN FOR A 1 BATH 1 BED AT 608sq FT IS $1407.00 THEIR APARTMENTS IN AUSTIN FOR A 1 BATH 3 BED AT 1485sq FT IS $2599.00 Schertz, a regional community, is greatly influenced by the cities that surround it. The days of relying solely on local methods, such as building more apartments, to lower houseing costs are long gone for this once small town. CITY OF SCHERTZ PROJECTS Gateway Deception by Omission During a public meeting, a member of the City Council expressed their belief that by keeping the language of the regulations ambiguous, the City would have the freedom to construct apartment buildings in any location of their choosing. Defending Zoning Rules The City of Schertz must not shy away from defending its Zoning Codes in court, as doing so would enable developers to disregard the City and its residents. In the event of a court failure, it is imperative to improve the existing codes for better outcomes. Cities Failure in Apartment Zoning The City of Schertz has been given more than 12 years to consider the location and method of establishing apartment / multi-family zones, as well as determine if there is a necessity for them. It is unreasonable for the City to shift the blame onto its citizens for its failure to devise a plan. Instead, the City should conduct research on how to make these areas more agreeable to the community, and if unsuccessful, reconsider implementing such changes. Gateway Standards The City of Schertz should strive for higher standards instead of seeking loopholes to bypass City Zoning Ordinances. In response to a request for communication records regarding this project, the City forwarded it to their City Attorneys and ultimately to the Texas Attorney General in order to avoid disclosing the requested information. Gateway Gateway CYPRESS POINT HOA HONESTY IN GOVERNMENT UN BIAS GOVERNMENT Ord. 23-S-35 Schertz Gateway Planned Development District (PDD) Samuel Haas|SENIOR PLANNER •Subject Property Outlined in Green •Approximately 65 acres of land •Currently undeveloped •General Business District (GB) •November 3, 2023: 29 public hearing notices mailed •Responses Received: 2 - In Favor 58 - Opposed •2 Signs w ere posted •December 20, 2023: Public Hearing notice published in the “San Antonio Express” •Texas LGC 211.006.d (d). If a proposed change to a regulation or boundary is protested in accordance with this subsection, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three -fourths of all members of the governing body. The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least 20 percent of either: (1) the area of the lots or land covered by the proposed change; or (2) the area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed change and extending 200 feet from that area. •Schertz Gateway PDD •Approx. 65 acres •Area I – Commercial •Area II - Multi - Family •Area III – Residential Low Density/Multi - Family Schertz Gateway PDD •Area I – Commercial •19.61 Acres •GB Uses and a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps •GB Design Standards •Trees planted at 3” •Planned improvements to Schwab Road Schertz Gateway PDD •Area II – Multi -Family •14.8 Acres •R -4 (Multi -Family) Use •Trees planted at 3” •11 Trees per acre Schertz Gateway PDD Schertz Gateway PDD •Area III – Residential/ Low Density Multi -Family •29.92 Acres •R -4 (Multi -Family) Use •Trees planted at 3” •11 Trees per acre •Planned extension of Froboese Lane •40 foot landscape buffer adjacent to Cypress Point Schertz Gateway PDD Comp Plan Conformance •Conventional detached dwelling. For areas proposed to utilize a traditional neighborhood design. May include a mix of residential uses and limited commercial. •Intended to encourage lower intensity commercial and office uses in locations that buffer major thoroughfares and residential uses. •Regional scale retail and commercial that take advantage of highway frontage. Comp Plan vs Zoning Staff Analysis – Section 21.5.10.F 1.Whether the proposed PDD implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, including the land use classification of the property on the Future Land Use Map? Yes - Area I – Primarily located within Highway Commercial and Commercial Campus Area II & III - Some multi -family is consistent with “mixture of residential uses language” Comp Plan: •"Achieve an efficient, diverse and balanced pattern of land uses within the City and the ETJ." •“Housing should be developed to meet all needs of the community in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy, and accessibility” •“Providing an appropriate mix of different land use types in suitable locations, densities and patterns consistent with the goals and objectives established in the Plan" Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 2. Whether the proposed PDD promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City? Yes - •The proposed commercial in Area I is more appropriate adjacent to the IH 35; also •Multi -family provides a better transition from the right of way and commercial than single family detached lots. Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change in zoning district classification and the standards applicable to such uses will be appropriate in the immediate area of the land to be reclassified? Yes - •Commercial uses (Area 1) are appropriate along IH 35. •Multi -family development appropriate adjacent to commercial Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 4. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers or other public services and utilities to the area? Yes - •Proximity to IH35 •Master Thoroughfare Plan assumes higher intensity development in this area with a planned East -West Connector (Froboese ) and improvements to Schwab Road. •2 Public hearing notices were sent to SCUCISD and Comal I SD, to the best of staff's knowledge, this change does not conflict with either districts campus forecasting. Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.4.D 5. Whether there have been environmental and/or economical changes which warrant the requested change? Yes - •Significant increase in housing cost in past 10 years •From $210,650 to $430,000 •Comp Plan: “Housing should be developed to meet all needs of the community in terms of affordability, availability, adequacy, and accessibility” Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 5. The extent to which the proposed PDD will result in a superior development than could be achieved through conventional zoning? Yes - •The proposed development provides opportunity for multiple uses. Residential and Commercial will occupy the same district and multi -family flexibility will offer opportunities for greater density than the base district. •Increased landscaping •Scope and scale of development will see improvements to two Major Thoroughfare Plan routes. Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 6. Whether all of the applicant's back taxed owed to the City have been paid in full (no application will receive final approval until all back taxes are paid in full? To the best of staff’s knowledge taxes are paid and this does not impact consideration by City Council. Staff Analysis - Section 21.5.10.F 7. Whether other criteria are met, which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council, are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment? •City Council’s discretion. Staff Recommendation •Proposed PDD Zoning conforms with the Comprehensive Plan and is consistence with the surrounding land uses. •Satisfies Criteria of Approval for UDC Section 21.5.10.F •Engineering, Planning, Fire, and Public Works, have reviewed the application with no objection. •Staff recommends approval of Ord. 23 -S -35 as presented and discussed. •The Planning and Zoning Commission met on November 15, 2023, and made a recommendation of approval with a 5 -1 vote. •The approval had conditions that the base Multi -family Residential District (R -4) setbacks were to be used in Area III, along with a greater landscape buffer abutting the Cypress Point Subdivision. •City Council met on January 9, 2024 and approved Ord. 23 -S -35 with a 7 -0 vote COMMENTS & QUESTIONS Agenda No. 5. CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting:January 16, 2024 Department:Facility & Fleet Subject:Resolution 24-R-01 - Authorizing expenditures with Alamo Restorations, LLC. for the EMS kitchen remodel. (B.James/D.Hardin-Trussell/C.Lonsberry) BACKGROUND The EMS Kitchen in Building 7 has the original stove, vent hood, cabinets and countertops from when the building was constructed in 1999. The kitchen needs to be remodeled to bring all items up to standard and code. A new stove, cabinet doors, and countertops need to be installed along with a vent hood with an Ansul/fire suppression system to meet the current building/fire-safety code requirements. This project was approved with PO 24-49918 for $48,028.87. The original quote was submitted during the summer with plans to begin the approval process at the start of FY 23-24. The original vent hood quoted has a manufactured "lead-time" of 50+ weeks due to uncontrollable circumstances. The only vent hood the vendor was able to find in stock and performs the same way as the original has dimensions that are 1 foot larger and the vent hood, and labor to install is more expensive. This change pushes the total project cost over $50,000.00 which requires City Council approval. GOAL Receive authorization for an amended contract of up to $64,717.94 with Alamo Restorations, LLC to complete the remodel the EMS Kitchen. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Paramedics, EMTs and the Battalion Chiefs will have a new-looking, fully functioning kitchen that meets current building and fire-safety codes where they can cook their meals while they are living in the EMS building during their shifts. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution of 24-0R-01 authorizing an amended contract with Alamo Restorations, LLC. for up to $64,717.94. FISCAL IMPACT The additional cost associated with the amended contract is $16,689.07 which will be funded by the EMS Department. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 24-R-01. Attachments Resolution 24-R-01 with attachment