Loading...
PZ 8-07-2024 Agenda with associated documents          MEETING AGENDA Planning & Zoning Commission REGULAR SESSION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION August 7, 2024                                   HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 7, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold the regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00p.m., Wednesday, August 7, 2024, at the City Council Chambers. In lieu of attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live stream on the City's YouTube Channel.        1.CALL TO ORDER      2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS  This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.CONSENT AGENDA:     A.Election of Planning and Zoning Commission Chair and Vice Chair.   B.Minutes for the July 3, 2024 Regular Meeting.     5.PUBLIC HEARING:   Planning & Zoning                                   August 7, 2024 Page 1 of 3  5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests, specific use permit requests, and Unified Development Code Amendments within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.      A.PLSPU20240142 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit to allow for a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps in General Business District (GB), on approximately 1.61 acres of land, known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 1396038, generally located southwest of the intersection of FM1518 and Schaefer Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.   B.PLZC20240155 – Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 71 acres of land from Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) and Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 41 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2) and approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310022, more specifically known as 12840 Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.   C.PLZC20240153 – Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 79 acres of land from Planned Development District (PDD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310060, more specifically known as 8676 Trainer Hale Rd, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.   6.ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION:     A.PLRP20240154 - Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat for the Royal Manufacturing Phase III Subdivision Lots 3-6, Block 3, approximately 75.24 acres of land generally located 1,860 feet to the west of the Tejas Way and Doerr Lane intersection, also known as Comal County Parcel ID 474772, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas.   7.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:     A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda      B.Announcements by Commissioners  City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended      C.Announcements by City Staff.  City and community events attended and to be attended.      8.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR      Planning & Zoning                                   August 7, 2024 Page 2 of 3    A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update     9.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING        CERTIFICATION I, Samuel Haas, Senior Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 2nd day of August , 2024 at 1:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code.  Samuel Haas, Senior Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on _____day of _______________, 2024. _______________title:_____________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619-1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.  Planning & Zoning                                   August 7, 2024 Page 3 of 3  PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:Election of Planning and Zoning Commission Chair and Vice Chair. BACKGROUND Based on Resolution 24-R-79: Planning and Zoning Commission Bylaws: "The Commission shall hold elections for a chair who shall serve as the presiding officer and vice chair at the first meeting in August of each year.". As this is the first meeting in August both Chair and Vice-Chair elections need to occur.  Attachments Resolution 24-R-79 Planning and Zoning Commission Bylaws  PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 4 B   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Emily Delgado, Planning Manager SUBJECT:Minutes for the July 3, 2024 Regular Meeting.   Attachments Draft Minutes for the July 3, 2024 Regular P&Z Meeting  D R A F T PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES July 3, 2024 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on July 3, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Roderick Hector, Commissioner; Danielle Craig, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; John Carbon, Commissioner Absent: Clayton Wallace, Commissioner; Tamara Brown, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner Staff present: Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Development; Brian James, Deputy City Manager; Emily Delgado, Planning Manager; Tiffany Danhof, Administrative Assistant; Madeleine Cole, Planner; Samuel Haas, Senior Planner              1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Outlaw called the special meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.   2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Commissioner Craig was seated as an alternate.   3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Adam Sharp- 2233 Den-Ott Hill Mark Tudyk- 18940 Old Wiederstein Rd.   4.CONSENT AGENDA:   A.Minutes for the June 5, 2024 Regular Meeting.       Motioned by Vice Chairman Richard Braud to approve, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   5.PUBLIC HEARING: 5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests, specific use permit requests, and Unified Development Code Amendments within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.   A.PLZC20240141 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 38.8 acres of land from Single-Family Residential/Agricultural District (R-A) to Apartment/Multi-Family District (R-4), known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68294, 68295, 68296, 68302, 68303, 68315 68316, generally located 1,100 feet to the west of the FM 2252 and IH 35 intersection, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mr. Haas and the applicant provided a presentation. Mr. Outlaw opened the public hearing at 6:25 P.M. Nichole Sharp- 2233 Den-Ott Hill Sandra Ott- 2305 Den-Ott Hill Gloria Ott Densberger- 2229 Den-Ott Hill James Ott- 2217 Den-Ott Hill Harold James Densberberger- 2229 Den-Ott Hill Adam Sharp- 2233 Den-Ott Hill John Jasek- 19018 Old Wiederstein Rd. Norine Baker- 19018 Old Wiederstein Rd. Brenda Ott- 2217 Den-Ott Hill Mr. Outlaw closed the public hearing at 6:44 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner John Carbon to recommend approval to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Danielle Craig  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   B.PLZC20240133 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 3.3 acres of land from Manufacturing – Light District (M-1) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, a portion of the property also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas Mr. Haas and the applicant provided a presentation. Mr. Outlaw opened the public hearing at 7:19 P.M. No one spoke. Mr. Outlaw closed the public hearing at 7:19 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Judy Goldick to recommend approval to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   C.PLSPU20240112 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific    C.PLSPU20240112 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit to allow a monopole telecommunication facility on approximately 1 acre of land, known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 47083, more specifically known as 120 Windy Meadows Drive, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mr. Haas and the applicant provided a presentation. Mr. Outlaw opened the public hearing at 7:30 P.M. Richard Rex- 9915 Marie Meadow, Garden Ridge; Stone Care of Texas- 116 Windy Meadows Mr. Outlaw closed the public hearing at 7:34 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Danielle Craig to recommend approval to the City Council with the condition that the building permit be issued within two years of approval, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   6.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:   A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda There were no requests by Commissioners.   B.Announcements by Commissioners City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended There were announcements by Commissioners.   C.Announcements by City Staff. City and community events attended and to be attended. There were no announcements by City staff.   7.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update      8.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING Chairman Mr. Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 7:40 P.M.   ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 5 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner SUBJECT:PLSPU20240142 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit to allow for a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps in General Business District (GB), on approximately 1.61 acres of land, known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 1396038, generally located southwest of the intersection of FM1518 and Schaefer Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 1.61 acres of land, located at the intersection of Schaefer Road and FM 1518. The subject property is currently zoned General Business (GB) and is undeveloped. Per the submitted Letter of Intent, the applicant is proposing a strip center with a convenience store, a gas station with electric vehicle charging stations, and a shopping center. UDC Section 21.5.8 Permitted Use Table requires a Specific Use Permit for convenience stores with gas pumps. On July 26, 2024, eighteen (18) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of this staff report, zero (0) responses in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and eight (8) responses opposed have been received. A public hearing notice will be published in the San Antonio Express prior to the City Council meeting. This item was previously heard on November 23, 2023 by the Planning and Zoning Commission. The Commission voted to recommend approval with a 4-2 vote. On December 19, 2023 City Council heard the item and voted to deny the request (the approval motion failed with a 3-4 vote). UDC Section 21.4.5 Post-Decision Procedures, requires that applicants wait 6 months after the date of the denial to submit the same development application.  Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing General Business District (GB)Undeveloped Proposed General Business District (GB)Convenience Store with Gas Pumps Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Right of Way Schaefer Road South Right of Way Brook Orchard Road East Right of Way FM 1518 West Single-Family Residential (R-6)Willow Grove Estates Unit 1 GOAL The goal of this project is to develop a convenience store with gas pumps upon the approval of the Specific Use Permit.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. The proposed use at the specified location is consistent with the policies embodied in the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan. This property is designated as Complete Neighborhood. Complete Neighborhood incorporates a variety of housing types with limited commercial in the manner of traditional neighborhood design. The commercial provision within the Complete Neighborhood designation is consistent with the proposed Specific Use Permit. 2. The proposed use is consistent with the general purpose and intent of the applicable zoning district regulations. This property is zoned General Business District (GB). This district is intended to provide suitable areas for the development of non-residential uses which offer a wide variety of retail and service establishments that are generally oriented toward serving the overall needs of the entire community. The proposed convenience store with gas pumps would meet the intent of the zoning district. 3. The proposed use is compatible with and preserves the character and integrity of adjacent developments and neighborhoods, and includes improvements either on-site or within the public rights-of-way to mitigate development related adverse impacts, such as safety, traffic, noise, odors, visual nuisances, drainage or other similar adverse effects to adjacent development and neighborhoods. Given the adjacent commercial development, neighboring commercial zoning districts, and the property abutting FM 1518, a principal arterial, the proposed use is compatible with the character and integrity of the neighborhood. The applicant will have to meet all site design standards in UDC Article 9. This is typically done during the site plan process and is in place to ensure adverse effects of development are minimized and mitigated on neighboring properties. 4. The proposed use does not generate pedestrian and vehicular traffic which will be hazardous or conflict with the existing and anticipated traffic in the neighborhood. The property abuts three separate rights of way, providing options to minimize conflict with existing traffic. The applicant will have to go through the site plan process if this proposed Specific Use Permit is approved. Any access point along FM1518 will need approval from the Texas Department of Transportation, and the City of Schertz Engineering Department will review a more detailed traffic impact analysis at the time of the site plan process.  5. The proposed use incorporates roadway adjustments, traffic control devices or mechanisms, and access restrictions to control traffic flow or divert traffic as may be needed to reduce or eliminate development generated traffic on neighborhood streets. The applicant is not required to submit, nor have they provided anything demonstrating roadway adjustments or traffic control devices. The City of Schertz Engineering Department will review a more detailed traffic impact analysis at the time of the site plan process, and will determine what traffic mitigation methods will be required.  6. The proposed use incorporates features to minimize adverse effects, including visual impacts, of the proposed use on adjacent properties. The proposed development will have to meet all site requirements in UDC Article 9, including the screening and buffering that will be required for the neighboring residential properties to the west. This will include a minimum eight-foot masonry screening wall and a minimum twenty-foot landscape buffer adjacent to the property line of the residential use. UDC Article 9 is in place to ensure adverse effects are minimized and mitigated. Additionally, the City adheres to the recommendations in the JBSA Joint Land Use Study (JLUS). Among these are enhanced lighting standards found in UDC Section 21.9.11. which include requirements such as lighting setbacks being equal to their height, or light sources being concealed from residential properties. 7. The proposed use meets the standards for the zoning district, or to the extent variations from such standards have been requested, that such variations are necessary to render the use compatible with standards have been requested, that such variations are necessary to render the use compatible with adjoining development and the neighborhood. The proposed development will have to meet all dimensional and design requirements of the General Business District (GB) as stipulated in UDC Article 5, Section 21.5.7. No variations to the requirements have been requested. 8. The proposed [use] promotes the health, safety or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City. As part of promoting health, safety and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. The existing General Business zoning of the subject property and adjacent properties indicates commercial intention for this area. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. Also, the proposed development would provide a transitional use by acting as a buffer for the residential portions of the Willow Grove Subdivision from FM 1518, which is a principal arterial. Additionally, Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments were notified of the Specific Use Permit request and have provided no objections. 9. No application made under these provisions will receive final approval until all back taxes owed to the City have been paid in full. This does not impact consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the first reading from City Council. 10. Other criteria which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council, are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the Specific Use Permit. Staff have ensured all UDC requirements have been met, and at this time have not received any special considerations from the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council. Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning district, as well as the consistency with the surrounding land uses. Staff is recommending approval of PLSPU20240142. RECOMMENDATION Approval of PLSPU20240142. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  Public Hearing Responses  Specific Use Exhibit  !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U 118573 4 WILLOW G R O V E HOMEO W N E R S ASSOC I N C 1 1 8 5 7 1 5 1185716 1185717 1185718 1185703 WILLOW G R O V E HOMEOW N E R S A S S O C I N C 1 1 8 5 7 3 9 1185708WILLOW GROVEHOMEOWNERS ASSOC INC 1185735 1185704 WILLOW G R O V E HOMEOW N E R S ASSOC IN C 1185705 1185706 308374DELTOROJESSE & RITA 308505RIVERA ANACLETO& MARIA E 1185736 1185737 1185738 308420JOROGADAENTERPRISES INC 308418MCGARRELLBRANDON 309822JIMENEZAURORA 1267151SCUC ISD SCHOOLBOARD OF TRUSTEES 1176443CRAIG THOMAS W &CRAIG DONALD W 1298668SPANLEY PROPERTIESII, LLC 308372SPANLEY PROPERTIESII, LLC 1322458CELLI LEASINGCOMPANY 1322459MK REALESTATE LLC 1396038TEG SCHERTZVENTURES LLC 1371073DURIEUX PHILLIPG & SANDRA 10" WL 10 " W L 8" W L 1 2 " W L 12" WL 8 " W L 8" WL 12" WL 2" W L 8" WL 6" W L 1 2 " W L 8" W L 8" WL 8" W L 12" WL A U R O R A S K Y P V T S T A T 1 0 4 1 4 E F M 1 5 1 8 N PVT STAT10414EFM1518N B O W I E S K N O L L SCHAEF E R R D P E C A N B R A N C H CYPRES S B A R N CLEAR W E L L LI S A M E A D O W S BROOK O R C H A R D C O T T O N S P I N D L E P V T S T A T 1 0 4 1 4 E F M 1 5 1 8 N E F M 1 5 1 8 N PVT S T A T 1 0 4 14 E F M 1 5 1 8 N 6" PVC SDR 26 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC SDR 35 8" PVC S D R 3 5 8" PVC SDR 2 6 8" PVC SDR 26 8" PVC SDR 26 8" P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC SD R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC S D R 3 5 (1 2 0 ' - 1 3 0 ' R O W ) ' Pr i n c i p a l A r t e r i a l (E F M 1 5 1 8 N ) (90' RO W ) ' Seconda r y A r t e r i a l (SCHAE F E R R D ) (70' RO W ) ' Residen t i a l C o l l e c t o r (SCHAE F E R R D ) Bexar County Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community41 Inch = 100 FeetFM 1518 & SCHAEFER RD(PLSPU20240142)0 100 200 30050Feet <all other values> Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Other Cities Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure 200' Buffer Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries U Hydrant !P Manholes 60' Expansion 60' Proposed 60' Extension 86' Expansion 86' Extension 86' Proposed 120' Expansion 120 ' Extension 120' Proposed Abandoned Future TxDOT Highway 1", 1 1/2" 2", 2 1/2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" g Unknown Neighboring Main Private Main 20" 24" 30" 36" Last update: July 12, 2024 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" withoutany express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the impliedwarranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The Cityof Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies ortypographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The Cityof Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein atany time.* City of Schertz FM 1518 & SCHAEFER ROAD (PLSPU20240142) : 11717 BROO K O R C H A R D (1185 7 3 4 ) 1 1 7 0 8 C Y P R E S S B A R N ( 1 1 8 5 7 1 5 ) 10505 PECAN B R A N C H (1185 7 1 6 ) 10501 PECA N B R A N C H (118 5 7 1 7 ) 10413 PECAN B R A N C H (118 5 7 1 8 ) 11737 BROO K O R C H A R D (1185 7 0 3 ) 1 1 7 1 3 C Y P R E S S B A R N ( 1 1 8 5 7 3 9 ) 10400 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 0 8 ) 10504 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 3 5 ) 11716 BROO K O R C H A R D (1185 7 0 4 ) 10412 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 0 5 ) 10408 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 0 6 ) 10508 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 3 6 ) 1051 2 PECA N B R A N C H (1185 7 3 7 ) 10516 PECAN B R A N C H (1185 7 3 8 ) 10630 E FM 1 5 1 8 N (3084 1 8 ) 10580 E FM 1 5 1 8 N (3098 2 2 ) 10414 E FM 1 5 1 8 N (1267 1 5 1 ) SCHA E F E R R D (100 0 5 0 4 8 ) 1178 7 SCHA E F E R R D (1322 4 5 8 ) 11791 SCHA E F E R R D (1322 4 5 9 ) 1178 6 SCHA E F E R R D (1396 0 3 8 ) PVT S T A T 104 1 4 E FM 1 5 1 8 N CLEAR WELL PVT S T A T 10414 E FM 15 1 8 N SCHAE F E R R D C O T T O N S P I N D L E P E C A N B R A N C H CYPRE S S B A R N BROO K O R C H A R D A U R O R A S K Y E F M 1 5 1 8 N P V T S T A T 1 0 4 1 4 E F M 1 5 1 8 N 0 100 200 30050Feet Project Boundary 200' Buffer ScrHunRutz \il{lutD&onfr,COMMUNITY SERVICE OPPORTUNIW PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN July 26,2024 Dear Property Owner, JUL 2 I zmh RECBIVBD The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Wednesdav. Auqust 7th. 2024 at 6:00 p.m. located at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 ScherE Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and make a recommendation on the following item: P1SPU20240142- Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps in General Business District (GB), on approximately 1.6 acres of land, known as Bexar County Property ldentification Number 1396038, generally located southwest of the intersection of FM1518 and Schaefer Road, 11786 Schaefer Rd, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. The Planning and Zoning Commission would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. You may return the reply form below by mail or personal delivery to Madeleine Cole, Planner, 1400 Scher2 Parkway, Schertz, Texas 78154, or by e-mail: planninq@schertz.com. lf you have any questions, please feel free to call Madeleine Cole, Planner at (210) 619-1781 . Sincerely ft'ln/rittrr, eta Madeleine Cole Planner I am: in favor of D opposed to E Reply Form: neutralto tr the request for P1SPU20240142 COMMENTS: NAME SIGNATU (PLEASE PRrNT) STREET ADDRESS 1 400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 781 54 21 0.61 9.1 000 DATE: * l1 1t, iEK ffi l, -A CIr-t o -h f'.f,n -Jo --tN t + t t I.Lt'tI t Ta r Ei f, !, t t. c -E PE $n"SHtr):t EA Es o o G'Eo= =t!o.norra II tvoq E =aD' E1 {ffir" >+err t. I. IN l E' zo I I I Ia d 7\\ i 1 Samuel Haas From:Lesa C. Wood Sent:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 2:07 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Fw: Not in my neighborhood! See below. Lesa Wood Director of Planning and Community Development City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Office: 210-619-1785 Mobile: 210-488-4202 Fax: 210-619-1789 Schertz.com From: Repof Texas <dansantos2300@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2024 1:55 PM To: Ralph Gutierrez <RalphGutierrez@schertz.com>; Mark Davis <markdavis@schertz.com>; Michelle Watson <mwatson@schertz.com>; Madeleine Cole <mcole@schertz.com>; Brian James <bjames@schertz.com>; Lesa C. Wood <LWood@schertz.com>; Steve Williams <steve.williams@schertz.com>; Scott Wayman <swayman@schertz.com>; Paul Macaluso <paulmacaluso@schertz.com>; Tiffany Gibson <tiffanygibson@schertz.com>; Robert Westbrook <robertwestbrook@schertz.com>; Allison Heyward <allisonheyward@schertz.com>; Tim Brown <TimBrown@schertz.com> Subject: Not in my neighborhood! Daniel Santos 10329Aurora Sky Schertz, Texas 78154 dansantos2300@gmail.com 346-321-6319 7/30/2024 Mayor Ralph Guiterrez 1400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 78154 Dear Mayor and Government Staff, I am writing to you as a concerned resident of Willow Grove Neighborhood regarding the proposed establishment of a new gas station at property #1396038. I will put it plain and simple…WE DO NOT WANT A GAS STATION IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD! I live in this neighborhood and run around it every day. Part of my run route is up front at the entrance where cars and trucks would be entering continuously. I don’t ask much from the government, however, I do want you to leave my neighborhood alone. While I understand the need for fuel services, I believe that permitting this gas station could have several adverse impacts on our community. I would like to outline ten reasons why I believe this proposal warrants careful reconsideration: 2 1. Environmental Impact: Gas stations can pose significant environmental hazards, including potential groundwater contamination from fuel spills and leaks. The risk of pollution could affect local water supplies and ecosystems. 2. Increased Traffic: The addition of a gas station will likely lead to increased traffic congestion in an area that is already experiencing heavy vehicular flow. This could exacerbate safety concerns, especially for pedestrians and children. 3. Safety Concerns: Gas stations can be targets for crime, including theft and vandalism. The increased presence of such facilities could lead to higher crime rates in our neighborhood. IT WOULD BE LOCATED DIRECTLY ACROSS SCHOOL. 4. Health Risks: Prolonged exposure to gasoline fumes and other pollutants emitted by gas stations can have detrimental effects on public health. Residents, especially those with respiratory conditions, may be at increased risk. 5. Aesthetic Impact: Gas stations often come with large signage and bright lighting, which could detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood. This could negatively affect property values and the overall character of the area. 6. Noise Pollution: The constant activity associated with a gas station, including deliveries, fuel dispensing, and vehicle idling, can contribute to increased noise pollution. This can disrupt the peace and quiet that many residents value. 7. Property Values: The proximity of a gas station could lower property values in the neighborhood. Prospective buyers may be deterred by the potential environmental and aesthetic impacts. 8. Alternative Fuel Options: With the growing shift towards electric vehicles and alternative fuels, the need for additional gas stations is decreasing. Investing in more sustainable infrastructure might better serve our community’s future needs. 9. Community Character: Our neighborhood prides itself on its unique character and sense of community. The addition of a gas station may undermine these qualities and transform the area into a more commercialized zone. 10. Local Business Impact: A new gas station could potentially affect nearby businesses, particularly those that rely on foot traffic or have specific customer bases that may be disrupted by the increased presence of a fuel station. I respectfully urge you to consider these concerns in the decision-making process regarding the proposed gas station. Our community's well-being, safety, and character should be of utmost priority, and I hope that alternative solutions can be explored to meet the needs of our residents while preserving the quality of our neighborhood. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. I look forward to your response and hope for a decision that reflects the best interests of our community. Sincerely, Daniel Santos Major, U.S. Army (R) A Very Concerned Resident and Active Voter! Dan Santos, MBA, MPA, MCJ Director of Operations | Leader | Business Strategist | Veteran ____________________________________________________________ San Antonio, TX 78154 346-321-6319 dansantos2300@gmail.com https://www.linkedin.com/in/dansantos2300/ ScrHunRutz \il{lutD&onfr,COMMUNITY SERVICE OPPORTUNIW PLANNING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARIN July 26,2024 Dear Property Owner, JUL 2 I zmh RECBIVBD The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission will conduct a public hearing on Wednesdav. Auqust 7th. 2024 at 6:00 p.m. located at the Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 ScherE Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas to consider and make a recommendation on the following item: P1SPU20240142- Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit to allow a Convenience Store with Gas Pumps in General Business District (GB), on approximately 1.6 acres of land, known as Bexar County Property ldentification Number 1396038, generally located southwest of the intersection of FM1518 and Schaefer Road, 11786 Schaefer Rd, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. The Planning and Zoning Commission would like to hear how you feel about this request and invites you to attend the public hearing. You may return the reply form below by mail or personal delivery to Madeleine Cole, Planner, 1400 Scher2 Parkway, Schertz, Texas 78154, or by e-mail: planninq@schertz.com. lf you have any questions, please feel free to call Madeleine Cole, Planner at (210) 619-1781 . Sincerely ft'ln/rittrr, eta Madeleine Cole Planner I am: in favor of D opposed to E Reply Form: neutralto tr the request for P1SPU20240142 COMMENTS: NAME SIGNATU (PLEASE PRrNT) STREET ADDRESS 1 400 Schertz Parkway Schertz, Texas 781 54 21 0.61 9.1 000 DATE: * James Harris 10435 Monicas Crk, Schertz Texas 78154 August 1, 2024 Shertz east is increasing in crime & is reflected as the most dangeous districts in Schertzhaving this convenience store with gas pump will exasurbate crime & make our open gatedcommunity less safe. l1 1t, iEK ffi l, -A CIr-t o -h f'.f,n -Jo --tN t + t t I.Lt'tI t Ta r Ei f, !, t t. c -E PE $n"SHtr):t EA Es o o G'Eo= =t!o.norra II tvoq E =aD' E1 {ffir" >+err t. I. IN l E' zo I I I Ia d 7\\ i 1 Samuel Haas From:Symone <uk_symone@yahoo.com> Sent:Thursday, August 1, 2024 9:40 PM To:planning@schertz.com; Ralph Gutierrez; Michelle Watson; Mark Davis; Tiffany Gibson; Paul Macaluso; Robert Westbrook; Allison Heyward; Tim Brown; Scott Wayman; Steve Williams; Brian James; Lesa C. Wood; mcole@schertz.com Subject:Attention PLSPU20240142 Dear Mayor, Government Staff and The Planning and Zoning Commission, I am wri ng to you as a concerned resident of Willow Grove Neighborhood regarding the proposed establishment of a new gas sta on at property #1396038. I DO NOT WANT A GAS STATION AT THE ENTRANCE OF THE WILLOW GROVE SUBDIVISION! I live in this neighborhood. My house is the very first house when driving into the neighborhood and I’m OPPOSED to the Specific Use Permit to allow a Connivence Store with Gas Pumps. This is the second me in about 6 months we have received a no ce of zone change and permit request for a gas sta on. Myself and several other families wrote le<ers and a<ended the first public hearing to relay our concerns. During that hearing the permit was denied. I ask it be denied again and this me permanently. Permi>ng this gas sta on could have several adverse impacts on our community. Below are several reasons why this proposal should be permanently denied. 1. Environmental Impact: Gas sta ons can pose significant environmental hazards, including poten al groundwater contamina on from fuel spills and leaks. The risk of pollu on could affect local water supplies and ecosystems. 2. Increased Traffic: The addi on of a gas sta on will likely lead to increased traffic conges on in an area that is already experiencing heavy vehicular flow. This could exacerbate safety concerns, especially for pedestrians and children. 3. Safety Concerns: Gas sta ons can be targets for crime, including theD and vandalism. The increased presence of such facili es could lead to higher crime rates in our neighborhood. IT WOULD BE LOCATED DIRECTLY ACROSS SCHOOL. Touching on the school, our children do not even have a crosswalk to get to the school. 4. Health Risks: Prolonged exposure to gasoline fumes and other pollutants emi<ed by gas sta ons can have detrimental effects on public health. Residents, especially those with respiratory condi ons, may be at increased risk. I have 2 young children this could poten ally affect. 5. Aesthe c Impact: Gas sta ons oDen come with large signage and bright ligh ng, which could detract from the visual appeal of our neighborhood. This could nega vely affect property values and the overall character of the area. 6. Noise Pollu on: The constant ac vity associated with a gas sta on, including deliveries, fuel dispensing, and vehicle idling, can contribute to increased noise pollu on. This can disrupt the peace and quiet that we value as residents. 7. Property Values: The proximity of a gas sta on could lower property values in the neighborhood. Prospec ve buyers may be deterred by the poten al environmental and aesthe c impacts. 8. Alterna ve Fuel Op ons: With the growing shiD towards electric vehicles and alterna ve fuels, the need for addi onal gas sta ons is decreasing. Inves ng in more sustainable infrastructure might be<er serve our community’s future needs. 9. Community Character: Our neighborhood prides itself on its unique character and sense of community. The addi on of a gas sta on may undermine these quali es and transform the area into a more commercialized zone. 10. Local Business Impact: A new gas sta on could poten ally affect nearby businesses, par cularly those that rely on foot traffic or have specific customer bases that may be disrupted by the increased presence of a fuel sta on. Please consider these concerns regarding the proposed gas sta on. Please deny the proposal. Please take my 2 children, my spouse, the other families who live in the Willow Grove subdivision, the elementary school and our community into considera on. Our community's well-being, residents, families, safety, and character should be priority. Thank you for your me and a<en on to this ma<er. I look forward to your response. RespecKully, Symone Owens, SMSgt, US Air Force (Re red) Sent from my iPad 1 Samuel Haas From:tommyb991 <tommyb991@gmail.com> Sent:Thursday, August 1, 2024 4:20 PM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:Zoning I do not favor current suggestions for a gas station in front of Willow Grove estates Tommy K Bush Sr 10412 Aurora Sky Schertz Texas 78154 1 Samuel Haas From:Teresa Smith <terecsla@gmail.com> Sent:Tuesday, July 30, 2024 11:07 AM To:planning@schertz.com Subject:PLSPU20240142 - OPPOSED! Dear Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission, I am writing to inform you that I am opposed to the construction of gas pumps that would be within 200 ft of my residence at 11708 Cypress Barn. I urge our city planners to adhere to Federal guidelines recommending at least 1,000 ft of separation between schools and gasoline dispensers. Sincerely, Teresa Smith terecsla.smith@gmail.com (310) 848-4522 PROPOSED RETAIL TRACT 1 Δ EX1 SITE DA T E DESIGNED BY: DRAWN BY: SCALE: DATE: SHEET NO. RE V I S I O N S : ESi t e D e v e l o p m e n t E n g i n e e r i n g S e r v i c e s Fi r m N o . 1 1 0 4 2 ww w . k l o v e e n g i n e e r i n g . c o m ( 2 1 0 ) 4 8 5 - 5 6 8 3 NG I N E E R I N G LOCATION MAP TE G S C H E R T Z V E N T U R E , L L C 78 0 1 N L A M A R , S T E . B 1 6 8 AU S T I N , T X 7 8 7 5 2 11786 SCHAEFER RD SPECIFIC USE PERMIT TRACT 1 LEGEND SC H A E F E R R D S T R I P C E N T E R PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 5 B   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:PLZC20240155 – Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 71 acres of land from Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) and Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 41 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2) and approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310022, more specifically known as 12840 Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 71 acres of land from Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) and Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 41 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2) and approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6). The subject property was recently annexed, is not platted, and is undeveloped. On July 22, 2024, a total of thirteen (13) public hearing notices were mailed to surrounding property owners within a 200-foot notification boundary of the subject property. At the time of the staff report, zero (0) responses in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and one (1) response in opposition have been received. A public hearing notice will be published in the "San Antonio Express" before the City Council Meeting. Additionally, one (1) sign was placed on the subject property by the applicant. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) and Agricultural District (AD) Agriculture/ Undeveloped  Proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-2) and Single-Family Residential District (R-6) Residential Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Right-of-Way Lower Seguin Road South Agricultural District (AD)Residential East Right-of-Way, Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A), Agricultural District (AD), and City of Cibolo Lower Seguin Road; Residential and Agriculture; City of Cibolo West Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A), Agricultural District (AD), and City of Schertz ETJ Residential and Undeveloped GOAL The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 71 acres of land from Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) and Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 41 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2) and approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6). COMMUNITY BENEFIT COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, staff uses the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below. 1. Whether the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, including the land use classification of the property on the Future Land Use Map. Yes, the proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and Single-Family Residential (R-2) implement the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan- Future Land Use Map. The subject property is designated as Complete Neighborhood in the Future Land Use Map. Complete Neighborhoods are general areas characterized by a mixture of housing options with supporting land uses. The Comprehensive Land Use Plan specifies that when considering the appropriateness of housing density or commercial activity, factors such as roadway classification, conflicts among land uses and buildings, as well as undue concentration or diffusion of population should be considered.  The proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and Single-Family Residential District (R-2) will provide a mixture of housing options within a proposed residential development, which meets the intent of the Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient, and healthful development of the City; As part of promoting health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. The proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and Single-Family Residential District (R-2) dimensional and development standards as stated in UDC Section 21.5.7.A of the Unified Development Code, are compatible with what is immediately in the surrounding area.  Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements for Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Ft. Max Impervious Coverage Requirements R-2 Single-Family Residential District 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% R-6 Single-Family Residential District 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change in zoning district classification and the standards applicable to such uses will be appropriate in the immediate area of the land to be reclassified. Yes, the uses permitted in the Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and Single-Family Residential District (R-2) are appropriate in the immediate area of the land to be reclassified. The purpose and intent of the Single-Family Residential District (R-6) is to allow for residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square Single-Family Residential District (R-6) is to allow for residential lots with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet with schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. The purpose and intent of Single-Family Residential District (R-2) is to allow for single-family detached residential with a minimum lot size of 8,400 square feet with schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. 4. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers or other public services and utilities to the area; The City of Schertz is the water and sewer provider for the subject property. Lower Seguin Road is identified as a Secondary Arterial with 90 feet of Right-of-Way in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. There is a Principal Arterial with 120-130 feet of Right-Of-Way on the western portion of the subject property. The subject property is not platted. The City of Schertz Engineering Department will review all proposed access points onto Lower Seguin Road during the platting process. A public hearing notice was mailed to Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District to notify them of the proposed zone change. Included as attachments are the most recent Demographic Report for SCUCISD as well as the most recent 10-Year Campus Forecasting Presentation. The City of Schertz Police, Fire and EMS Departments have indicated they do not have any concerns regarding the proposed rezoning requests or their ability to provide services. 5. Whether there have been environmental and/or economical changes which warrant the requested change; The subject property was annexed to the City of Schertz in July 2024 and was given Agricultural District (AD) zoning with annexation. The applicant was waiting for the annexation to start their proposed zone change request. Significant changes are happening to Lower Seguin Road with new residential developments that are concurrent with the FM 1518 construction.  6. Whether there is an error in the original zoning of the property for which a change is requested. There was no error in the original zoning of the subject property. The subject property was given the Agricultural District (AD) zoning with its annexation in July 2024. 7. Whether all of the applicant's back taxes owed to the City have been paid in full. This does not impact the Planning and Zoning Commission's recommendation to City Council. 8. Whether other criteria are met, which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change application and at this time have not received special considerations from the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council. RECOMMENDATION Due to the compatibility with the surrounding area, and implementation of the policies in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan and Future Land Use Map, Staff recommends approval of PLZC20240155. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  Public Hearing Responses  Zoning Exhibit  SCUCISD Demographic Report  SCUCISD 10 Year Campus Forecasting  :12840 LOWER SEGUIN RD (PLZC20240155) U U U L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d Ci b o l o C r e e k L o w e r S eguinRd Low e r S e g u i n R d Cib olo C re e k C i b o l o C r e e k L o w er S e g uin R d Lower S e g u i n R d C i b o l o C re e k We ir R d Weir R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d Ci b o lo Creek W e ir R d 69583 MCMAHON HELEN & JACK A 69620 ZAMBRANO ROSENDO 310022 FRIESENHAHN MILTON & BILLIE, BASHA ELIZABETH ANN, ZWIEKE 310021 GUAJARDO GUILLERMO J & MARTHA C 30942 9 FERNA N D E Z ROSEN D O Z A M B R A N O 31200 8 ZAMB R A N O ROSEN D O 3 1 0 0 1 9 R I C I O P P O C R I S T I N A E & M I C H A E L P 11395 3 0 RICIO P P O C R I S T I N A E & MICHA E L P 310032 HOLTZ SEANNA FRASER 13673 9 0 ASHTO N S A N A N T O N I O RESID E N T I A L L L C 3 1 0 0 1 2 F R I E S E N H A H N M I L T O N & B I L L I E , B A S H A E L I Z A B E T H A N N , Z W I E K E 10007 8 3 8 ASHTO N S A N A N T O N I O RESID E N T I A L L L C 3 1 0 0 1 1 A S H T O N S A N A N T O N I O R E S I D E N T I A L L L C 31001 1 ASHTO N S A N ANTON I O R E S I D E N T I A L L L C 3 0 9 4 2 7 B A U M A N N L A R R Y W & Y V O N N E Z (90' ROW) Planned Secondary Arterial (LOWER SEGUIN RD) (12 0 ' - 1 3 0 ' R O W ) Pla n n e d P r i n c i p a l Art e r i a l (N O R T H & S O U T H C O N N E C T O R ) 2 " W L 30" W L 8" WL 4" WL 2" WL S P U R H O L L O W D E W R I D G E W A Y BULLDOGGER W AY LOWE R S E G U I N R D PI N E R I V E R D R B U L L B R A N C H A V E DENI M STAK E DR P A S E O P O S T P L LAGU N A CRES T OLD CHUT E R D L O W E R VA L L E Y L N HORIZ O N C R E S T W E I R R D M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N PALO M I N O SPUR WINDI N G BUTT E Q U A I L C R E S T D R H O M E S I D E HOLLOW R E D A P P L E R D MULH O U S E D R LOWE R P E A C H W A Y H I L L P L A I N S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L R E D B U D C A N Y O N C A R M E L V I E W K E T T L E C O R N T R L HORS E B A C K P L G u a d a l u p e C o u n t y B e x a r C o u n t y Maxar, Microsoft, Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of Cibolo, Texas, BCAD, Texas Parks & Wildlife, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, CONANP, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, Foursquare, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS 0 300 600 900150Feet Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Residential Collector Planned Residential Collector Planned Commercial Collector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" Unknown Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes [Ú CCMA Lift Station [Ú Private Lift Station [Ú Schertz Lift Station 3Q CCMA Treatment Plant 3Q Schertz Treatment Plant County Boundaries Schertz Municipal Boundary ETJ Last update: July 22, 2024 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" withoutany express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the impliedwarranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The Cityof Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies ortypographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The Cityof Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein atany time.* City of Schertz 12840 LOWER SEGUIN RD (PLZC20240155) : 12870 LOWE R S E G U I N R D (3100 2 1 ) 13191 LOWER SEGUIN RD (309429) 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 0 9 4 2 7 ) L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 1 2 0 0 8 ) 1 2 8 4 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 1 0 0 1 9 ) 1284 0 LOWE R S E G U I N R D (1139 5 3 0 ) L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 1 0 0 1 2 ) 12820 LOWER SEGUIN RD (310032) LOWE R S E G U I N R D (1367 3 9 0 ) LOWER SEGUIN RD (1394925) MULH O U S E D R QUAIL CREST D R D E W R I D G E W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L K E T T L E C O R N T R L B U L L D O G G E R W A Y LOWE R V A L L E Y L N SAVER N E WAY HORIZ O N C R E S T M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N WEIR R D S T V I N C E N T W A Y SPUR H O L L O W LOWE R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D HOM E S I D E HOLL O W P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D PRAI R I E V A L L E Y MIRECOUR T W A Y SKY CREEK BLVD RED A P P L E R D S A R R E B O U R G S T C A R M E L R A N C H PI N E R I V E R D R S U N N Y V E R A N D A R D HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R P E A C H W A Y WIND I N G PEAR L N DENIM STAK E D R BAY MARE L N C A R M E L V I E W HORSE B A C K P L G A L I N E E R G L E N LAGUN A C R E S T ST LO U I S WAY LOWER SEGUIN RD B L U E B O N N E T P T WINDI N G B U T T E P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N 0 400 800 1,200200Feet 200' Buffer Project Boundary Municipal Boundaries R-A PRE D V L R-2 R-6 PRE AD PDD AD SPUR H O L L O W LOWE R SEGUI N R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E B U L L D O G G E R W A Y P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D HILL PLAIN S D R K E T T L E C O R N T R L R E D B U D C A N Y O N P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D AD R-A AD PRE D V L PRE AD PDD R-ASPUR H O L L O W LOWE R SEGUI N R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E B U L L D O G G E R W A Y P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D HILL PLAIN S D R K E T T L E C O R N T R L R E D B U D C A N Y O N P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D Last update: July 22, 2024 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but notlimited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special,indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials.Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the informationherein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* BEXAR COUNTY PARCEL ID: 310022 CURRENT PROPOSED : Classification (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) 0 450 900 1,350225Feet PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE 4Q22 Demographic Report 2 San Antonio Economic Conditions 3.1 13.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Unemployment Rate, Aug 2019 -Dec 2022 San Antonio Texas 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.7 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. Bexar Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Dec-21 Dec-22 © 2022 Zonda 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2012Q4 2013Q4 2014Q4 2015Q4 2016Q4 2017Q4 2018Q4 2019Q4 2020Q4 2021Q4 2022Q4 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual ClosingsSource: Zonda San Antonio New Home Starts & Closings Key Trends Starts: -9% YOY / -15% QOQ Closings: +7% YOY / +4% QOQ Starts Exceed Closings by 1,162 Homes 19,035 17,873 4 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family market-December 2022 5 Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD Housing Market Analysis Average New vs. Existing Home Sale Price, 2012 -2022 •Since 2012, the average new home price in SCUCISD has more than doubled, a rise of nearly $221,000 •The average existing home price within the district has increased by 87%, or more than $153,000 since 2012 Avg New Home Avg Existing Home 2012 $210,650 $174,468 2013 $231,997 $178,212 2014 $250,897 $187,097 2015 $262,532 $181,881 2016 $284,037 $189,189 2017 $297,182 $197,710 2018 $328,762 $221,637 2019 $314,299 $234,868 2020 $318,065 $247,691 2021 $345,858 $257,537 2022 $431,606 $327,526 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 New Home Price Existing Home Price 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –4Q22 * Based on additional Zonda Education housing research Rank District Name Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,858 3,985 3,066 6,340 25,851 2 COMAL ISD 3,187 2,976 2,685 4,175 24,094 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,135 2,001 1,431 3,993 27,451 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,157 1,691 1,544 3,533 26,459 5 JUDSON ISD 1,449 1,397 956 1,255 1,323 6 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-U CITY ISD*979 960 746 1,833 7,001 7 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,107 843 860 1,926 10,350 8 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 740 806 544 1,087 6,483 9 BOERNE ISD 594 706 577 1,123 11,097 10 SEGUIN ISD 548 554 329 895 5,300 11 SOUTHSIDE ISD 448 422 285 1,148 10,138 12 NAVARRO ISD 642 398 467 1,635 4,660 13 NORTH EAST ISD 439 385 349 682 6,020 14 SAN ANTONIO ISD 238 308 220 375 999 15 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 269 180 198 176 637 16 LYTLE ISD 87 96 40 109 1,381 17 HARLANDALE ISD 40 76 27 14 144 18 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 59 42 68 93 22 19 JOURDANTON ISD 0 24 4 4 36 20 MARION ISD 24 14 30 340 4,388 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings Starts 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Closings 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1Q 190 196 175 201 237 294 349 1Q 225 194 133 138 165 190 181 2Q 168 168 180 176 197 300 393 2Q 237 172 185 211 249 258 227 3Q 233 167 177 207 261 265 174 3Q 235 179 185 240 286 268 218 4Q 142 172 185 198 232 319 63 4Q 161 148 161 179 213 196 334 Total 733 703 717 782 927 1,178 979 Total 858 693 664 768 913 912 960 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 66 12 18 10 57 64 161 500 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 3 0 5 1 1 2 36 38 ROSE GARDEN 295 8 448 101 153 215 438 3,307 SCHERTZ 98 6 73 39 48 62 26 60 SIPPEL 130 23 175 45 94 118 696 1,526 WATTS 155 2 65 43 99 118 82 633 WIEDERSTEIN 232 12 176 95 126 167 394 937 Grand Total 979 63 960 334 578 746 1,833 7,001 Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category District Housing Overview •The district has 23 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 7 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on more than 1,140 lots within 12 subdivisions •392 lots have been delivered in the 4th quarter 9 Buffalo Crossing •1,230 total lots •493 future lots •101 vacant developed lots •37 homes under construction •586 occupied homes •Started 3 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 9 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on 95 lots in Phase 2 •$360K+10 Residential Activity Venado Crossing •507 total lots •364 future lots •17 vacant developed lots •61 homes under construction •53 occupied homes •Started 2 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 32 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on Phase 2 (53 lots) •$350K+ 11 Residential Activity Homestead •1,470 total lots •783 future lots •381 vacant developed lots •27 homes under construction •268 occupied homes •Started 2 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 6 starts since 3Q22 •276 lots in Phases 5 –9 delivered for homebuilding 4Q22 •Equipment on site for 62 lots in Phase 11 •$400K -$700K Saddle Creek Ranch •809 total lots •82 future lots •76 vacant developed lots •48 homes under construction •596 occupied homes •Started 8 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 17 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on Phase 9 (82 lots) •$290K+ •There are more than 550 multi-family units under construction •There are nearly 800 future multi-family units in various stages of planning across the district 12 District Multi-Family Overview 13 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2018/19 70 337 982 1,050 1,070 1,143 1,205 1,198 1,146 1,139 1,264 1,366 1,356 1,291 1,201 15,818 2019/20 86 327 1,048 1,036 1,093 1,125 1,184 1,211 1,234 1,183 1,180 1,419 1,340 1,282 1,224 15,972 154 1.0% 2020/21 77 248 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 -299 -1.9% 2021/22 78 377 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 67 369 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 67 414 927 881 997 1,049 1,143 1,133 1,099 1,159 1,249 1,476 1,457 1,297 1,225 15,573 52 0.3% 2024/25 67 428 954 998 910 1,049 1,122 1,161 1,174 1,123 1,178 1,419 1,455 1,365 1,267 15,670 97 0.6% 2025/26 67 454 1,007 1,036 1,032 960 1,117 1,142 1,191 1,195 1,140 1,331 1,384 1,366 1,330 15,752 82 0.5% 2026/27 67 477 1,061 1,086 1,068 1,082 1,019 1,138 1,178 1,220 1,214 1,295 1,310 1,302 1,334 15,851 99 0.6% 2027/28 67 477 1,062 1,142 1,114 1,115 1,133 1,039 1,173 1,201 1,239 1,376 1,271 1,231 1,271 15,911 60 0.4% 2028/29 67 490 1,090 1,118 1,171 1,170 1,179 1,155 1,069 1,192 1,220 1,400 1,348 1,194 1,205 16,068 157 1.0% 2029/30 67 493 1,098 1,147 1,154 1,228 1,236 1,202 1,191 1,087 1,211 1,384 1,375 1,267 1,168 16,308 240 1.5% 2030/31 67 498 1,107 1,158 1,184 1,209 1,296 1,259 1,239 1,212 1,104 1,376 1,357 1,292 1,239 16,597 289 1.8% 2031/32 67 506 1,125 1,168 1,197 1,243 1,279 1,320 1,298 1,262 1,231 1,256 1,348 1,276 1,263 16,839 242 1.5% 2032/33 67 512 1,137 1,186 1,207 1,258 1,315 1,303 1,361 1,324 1,282 1,398 1,232 1,266 1,247 17,095 255 1.5% 14 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 750 752 767 816 869 910 925 936 950 968 GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 576 549 536 535 559 574 585 593 594 591 NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 600 588 600 602 618 625 628 630 627 623 ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 963 1,010 1,062 1,099 1,149 1,201 1,254 1,292 1,333 1,368 SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 684 688 683 699 701 701 694 686 670 657 SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 749 745 771 802 845 873 904 927 953 998 WATTS EL 673 924 593 586 591 599 618 641 656 671 679 680 688 WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 571 606 655 690 728 745 762 776 778 788 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,406 5,478 5,528 5,673 5,860 6,110 6,285 6,423 6,519 6,585 6,682 Elementary Percent Change -3.40%1.34%0.91%2.62%3.29%4.27%2.86%2.20%1.49%1.01%1.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 72 50 145 187 250 175 138 96 66 96 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 775 827 822 857 844 859 932 977 1,030 1,056 SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 723 776 769 703 642 642 703 746 788 800 WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 734 732 742 756 726 723 758 775 800 808 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,200 2,232 2,335 2,333 2,316 2,212 2,224 2,393 2,498 2,618 2,664 Intermediate Percent Change -6.18%1.45%4.61%-0.09%-0.73%-4.49%0.54%7.60%4.39%4.80%1.76% Intermediate Absolute Change -145 32 103 -2 -17 -104 12 169 105 120 46 15 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,311 1,235 1,242 1,329 1,319 1,267 1,193 1,204 1,312 1,386 CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,097 1,066 1,093 1,105 1,121 1,145 1,105 1,112 1,181 1,220 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,536 2,408 2,301 2,335 2,434 2,440 2,412 2,298 2,316 2,493 2,606 Junior High School Percent Change -2.65%-5.05%-4.44%1.48%4.24%0.25%-1.15%-4.73%0.78%7.64%4.53% Junior High School Absolute Change -69 -128 -107 34 99 6 -28 -114 18 177 113 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,613 2,626 2,566 2,513 2,454 2,433 2,484 2,524 2,491 2,530 STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,723 2,761 2,726 2,609 2,576 2,595 2,591 2,621 2,533 2,494 ALSELC 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,379 5,455 5,506 5,411 5,241 5,149 5,147 5,194 5,264 5,143 5,143 High School Percent Change 0.65%1.41%0.93%-1.73%-3.14%-1.76%-0.04%0.91%1.35%-2.30%0.00% High School Absolute Change 35 76 51 -95 -170 -92 -2 47 70 -121 0 DISTRICT TOTALS 15,521 15,573 15,670 15,752 15,851 15,911 16,068 16,308 16,597 16,839 17,095 District Percent Change -2.32%0.34%0.62%0.52%0.63%0.38%0.98%1.50%1.77%1.46%1.52% District Absolute Change 369 52 97 82 99 60 157 240 289 242 255 16 Key Takeaways Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD experienced record high new home closings in 4Q22 The district has 23 actively building subdivisions with over 1,800 lots available to build on SCUCISD has 7 future subdivisions with approx. 7,000 lots in the planning stages Groundwork is underway on more than 1,140 lots within 12 subdivisions Five year enrollment could exceed 15,900 15,521 15,911 17,095 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 17,500 Enrollment Projections FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (CURRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 5 C   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:PLZC20240153 – Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 79 acres of land from Planned Development District (PDD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310060, more specifically known as 8676 Trainer Hale Rd, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 79 acres of land from Planned Development District (PDD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1). The subject property is currently unplatted and undeveloped.  On June 22, 2024, six (6) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property. At the time of the Staff Report, one (1) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. A public hearing notice will be published in the "San Antonio Express" prior to the City Council hearing. Additionally, one public hearing notice sign was placed on the subject property by the applicant. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Planned Development District (PDD) Sterling Grove PDD (Ordinance 22-S-28)Undeveloped Proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1)Residential Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Planned Development District (PDD)Sterling Grove PDD (Ordinance 22-S-28); Undeveloped South  Right-of-Way Trainer Hale Road East Agricultural District (AD)Residential and Agricultural West Pre-Development District (PRE) & Planned Development District (PDD) Residential and Undeveloped GOAL The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 79 acres from Planned Development District (PDD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1). COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, staff uses criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below. When evaluating zone changes, staff uses criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below. 1. Whether the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, including the land use classification of the property on the Future Land Use Map . Yes, the proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1) does implement the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan and Future Land Use Map. The subject property is identified as Complete Neighborhood in the Future Land Use Map. The Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation is meant to provide for a mixture of housing types with supporting land uses.  The proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1) requires 9,600 square foot lots, which would provide for a housing type that is not yet along Trainer Hale Road. The proposed zone change provides a new housing type within the immediate area, meets the intent of the Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation, and implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City; As part of promoting health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. The dimensional requirements for Single-Family Residential District (R-1), as listed in Table 21.5.7.A, of UDC Section 21.5.7, are compatible within the immediate area of the subject property.  Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts  Minimum Lot Size Requirements Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Requirements Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Ft. Max Impervious Coverage R-1 Single-Family Residential District 9,600 80 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change in zoning district classification and the standards applicable to such uses will be appropriate in the immediate area of the land to be reclassified. Yes, the uses permitted in Single-Family Residential District (R-1) are appropriate in the immediate area to be reclassified. The purpose and intent of the Single-Family Residential District (R-1) is for single-family detached residential dwellings on a minimum 9,600 square foot lot size, together with the schools, churches, and parks necessary to create basic neighborhood units. The proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1) would allow for a maximum number of 357 residential units at the minimum dimensional requirements listed in 21.5.7.A, which does not account for required streets, larger lots, irregular lots, drainage, and proposed amenities. Additionally, the lot dimensions of the proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1) act as a transitional zoning district adjacent to the Agricultural District (AD) property to the east and the Pre-Development District (PRE) property to the west.  4. Whether the proposed change is in accord with any existing or proposed plans for providing public schools, streets, water supply, sanitary sewers or other public services and utilities to the area; The subject property is within the Green Valley Special Utility District CCN for water and sewer. The property is located along Trainer Hale Road which is a Secondary Arterial with 90 feet of Right-of-Way per the Master Thoroughfare Plan. Although the property is currently not platted, the City of Schertz Engineering Department Thoroughfare Plan. Although the property is currently not platted, the City of Schertz Engineering Department will review the proposed access points for the development during the platting process.  A public hearing notice was mailed to Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District to notify them of the proposed zone change. Included as attachments are the most recent Demographic Report for SCUCISD as well as the most recent 10-Year Campus Forecasting Presentation. The City of Schertz Police, Fire and EMS Departments have indicated they do not have any concerns regarding the proposed rezoning requests or their ability to provide services. 5. Whether there have been environmental and/or economical changes which warrant the requested change. The subject property is currently located within the Sterling Grove Planned Development District and has been since the approval of Ordinance 22-S-28 in 2022. The subject property consists of portions of Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 of the Sterling Grove PDD. The PDD is built of single-family residential lots with a mixture of dimensions being 55 feet by 100 feet, 65 feet by 110 feet, and half-acre lots. The PDD restricts development to the street layout and phasing of the Planned Development District. Although the applicant can develop the land with the approved PDD dimensional requirements, they are dependent on undeveloped land for required points of access, streets, and other infrastructure. The properties within the Sterling Grove PDD, that are within Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 of the PDD, do not have any current planning application at this time. The applicant is ready to start the development process and submit planning applications for the subject property, if the proposed zone change is approved. Leaving the Sterling Grove PDD and an approved zone change to Single-Family Residential District (R-1) would allow the applicant to submit the appropriate planning applications without being restricted to the Sterling Grove PDD layout and without needing to depend on adjacent property owners to develop the required infrastructure the applicant needs. If the zone change is approved, the applicant would need to meet all City of Schertz requirements for their approximately 79 acres independently.  6. Whether there is an error in the original zoning of the property for which a change is requested. No, there was no error in the original zoning of the property. In 2022, the subject property was part of a larger proposed development known as Sterling Grove Planned Development District. No ground has been broken for the proposed Sterling Grove Planned Development District. The applicant is ready to develop, and to meet the City of Schertz requirements, the applicant needs to change the street layout, which ultimately, changes the intent and character of the Sterling Grove PDD. A zone change allows the applicant to develop the subject property sooner and submit the applicable planning applications. 7. Whether all of the applicant's back taxes owed to the City have been paid in full. This does not effect the Planning and Zoning Commission recommendation to City Council. 8. Whether other criteria are met, which, at the discretion of the Planning and Zoning Commission and the City Council are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change application and at this time have not received special considerations from the Planning and Zoning Commission or City Council.   RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of PLZC20240153, zone change to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), due to its compatibility within the surrounding area, implementation of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan, and meeting the intent of the Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  Public Hearing Responses  Legal Metes and Bounds  Zoning Exhibit  Applicant's Zoning Exhibit  Sterling Grove PDD  SCUCISD Demographic Report  SCUCISD 10 Year Campus Forecasting  1190132MARTINRUTH E 310166 SWEET PHILIP 310225VRANA GERALDWAYNE 310121KNEUPPER BRYSONPROPERTIES LTD 310060HARTMANN VALERIE& BEUTNAGEL BRIAN 310045ANCIENT KKENDEAVORS LLC & 339295WIEDERSTEINALLEN 10 1 3 7 9 7 B R Y S O N K N E U P P E R P R O P E R T I E S 339275LUENSMANN HENRRYW FAMILY TR & 312015WEIR DALEMORGAN 339274LUENSMANN HENRRYW FAMILY TR & 1252033HEGLERRYAN P 339286HERRERAJOYLENE S 310053ROBERTSON REBECCA,WIEDERSTEIN DAVID,McDANIEL VICKIE& HUNTER DIANE 1056966PENSHORNCATTLE CO LLC 3 3 9 2 7 6 L U E N S M A N N C H A R L E S O 31 0 2 2 2 B A R R J A M E S W JR & S H A R O N 310061BRYCAP COMMLPROPERTIES LLC 10 1 3 7 9 8 B A R R J A M E S W JR & S H A R O N 312017WEIR DALEMORGAN 310175CORRIGAN DANIELO & CHRISTIN M 339290HAECKERRALPH 310056 WRIGH T R O B E R T L & DE B O R A H K 310059LUENSMANNCHARLES O 339284REAL CHARLES E &REAL JOHN THOMAS 2" WL 4" W L 1 1 / 2 " W L P V T R D A T 8 32 1 T R AIN E R H A L E R D P V T R D A T 8 3 2 0 T R AIN E R H A L E R D TRAINE R H A L E R D PVTRDAT7820EFM1518N PVT RD A T 8 2 1 5 TRAINE R H A L E R D W E I R R D (12 0 ' - 1 3 0 ' R O W ) ' P l a n n e d Pri n c i p a l A r t e r i a l (T R A I N E R H A L E R D ) (90' R O W ) ' P l a n n e d Seco n d a r y A r t e r i a l (EA S T & W E S T C O N N E C T O R ) (70' R O W ) ' P l a n n e d Re s i d e n t i a l C o l l e c t o r (N O R T H & S O U T H C O N N E C T O R ) (1 2 0 ' - 1 3 0 ' R O W ) ' Pl a n n e d P r i n c i p a l Ar t e r i a l ( N O R T H & S O U T H C O N N E C T O R ) (90' RO W ) ' Seconda r y A r t e r i a l (TRAIN E R H A L E R D ) Source: Esri, Maxar, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS User Community41 Inch = 300 FeetPoppy Hills Subdivision(PLZC20240153)0 300 600 900150Feet <all other values> Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Other Cities Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure 200' Buffer Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries U Hydrant !P Manholes 60' Expansion 60' Proposed 60' Extension 86' Expansion 86' Extension 86' Proposed 120' Expansion 120 ' Extension 120' Proposed Abandoned Future TxDOT Highway 1", 1 1/2" 2", 2 1/2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" g Unknown Neighboring Main Private Main 20" 24" 30" 36" 8745 TR A I N E R HALE RD (339274 ) 8676 TRAINERHALE RD(310060) 8712 TRAINERHALE RD(310056) 8602 TRAINERHALE RD(310059) 7820 E FM1518 N(310061) 9275 WEIR RD(310053) 87 2 4 T R A I N E R H A L E R D (1 0 1 3 7 9 7 ) Bexar County PVT RD A T 8 3 2 1 T R A I N E R H A L E R D TRAINE R H A L E R D PVTRDAT7820EFM1518N PVT RD A T 8 2 1 5 T R A I N E R H A L E R D W E I R R D 4 0 600 1,200300 Fe e t City of Sc h e rtzPOPPY HILLSSUBDIV ISION(PLZC20240153) Proje c t Are a 200' Buffe r Last Upd ate:July 12, 2024 “T h e City of Sc h e rtz prov ide s th is Ge ograph ic Inform ation System prod uc t "as is" with out any expre ss or im plie dwarranty of any k ind inc luding but not lim ite d to th e im plie d warrantie s of m e rc h antability and fitness for a partic ular purpose.In no e v e nt sh all T h e City of Sc h e rtz be liable for any spe c ial, ind ire c t or c onse que ntial d am age s or any d am age s wh atsoe v er arising out of or in c onnec tionwith th e use of or pe rform anc e of th e se m ate rials. Inform ation publish e d in th is produc t c ould inc lud e te c h nic al inac c urac ie s or typograph ic al e rrors. Period ic alc h ange s m ay be m ad e and inform ation m ay be ad d e d to th e inform ation h e re in. T h e City of Sc h e rtz m ay m ak e im prov e m ents and /or c h ange s in th e prod uc t(s)de sc ribed h e re in at any tim e .” City of Sc h e rtz, GIS De partm e nt, gis@sc h e rtz.c om AD PDD DVL AD AD PRE R-1 TRAIN E R H A L E R D PVT R D A T 9275 W E I R R D PVT R D A T 7 9 9 3 TRAIN E R H A L E R D PVT R D A T 8 2 1 5 TRAIN E R H A L E R D PVT R D A T 8 3 2 1 TRAIN E R H A L E R D W E I R R D AD AD PDD DVL AD PDD PRE TRAIN E R H A L E R D PVT R D A T 9275 W E I R R D PVT R D A T 7 9 9 3 TRAIN E R H A L E R D PVT R D A T 8215 T R A I N E R HALE R D PVT R D A T 8 3 2 1 TRAIN E R H A L E R D W E I R R D Last update: August 1, 2024 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but notlimited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special,indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials.Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the informationherein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* BEXAR COUNTY PARCEL ID: 310060 CURRENT : Classification (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) 0 600 1,200 1,800300Feet PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSED 67 1 672 673 6 7 3 6 7 0 66 7 67 0675 679 677 678 676 67 5 674 673 678 67 6 680 681682 683 677 676 67 4 674 673 672 670 669 67 1 671 671 670 6 6 5 66 0 6 5 7 6 6 5 67 0 67 5 S59° 01' 17"W 1470.42 N30° 26' 46"W 208.38 S59° 41' 08"W 208.48 N3 0 ° 2 4 ' 2 6 " W 81 7 . 9 3 N3 0 ° 1 9 ' 5 1 " W 10 4 0 . 1 6 N59° 43' 43"E 1676.34 S3 0 ° 2 6 ' 3 1 " E 20 4 8 . 1 8 Moy Tarin Ramirez Engineers, LLC Engineers Surveyors Planners ZONING EXHIBIT PROJECT No.:SCALE:DATE: PROJECT NAME: DRAWING NAME: XXXXX 1" = 200'June 13, 2024 OWNERS INFORMATION APPLICANT SURVEYOR NOTE: SITE NORTH TRAINER HALE RD. Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310056 WRIGHT ROBERT L & DEBORAH K. 8712 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 7815440 DEED NUMBER: 20150155533 Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 1013797 BRYSON KNUEPPER PROPERTIES 8724 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 1013798 BARR JAMES W JR & SHARON TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310222 BARR JAMES W JR & SHARON 8758 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310225 VRANA GERALD WAYNE 8770 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: PROPERTY INFORMATION AND LAND USE Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310061 BRYCAP COMML PROPERTIES LLC 7820 E FM 1518 N SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310053 ROBERTSON REBECCA, WIEDERSTEIN DAVID, MCDANIEL VICKIE & HUNTER DIANE 9275 WEIR AVE SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 310059 LUENSMANN CHARLES O 8602 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: Owner Name and Address: PROPERTY ID: 339274 LUENSMANN HENRY W FAMILY TR & 8841 TRAINER HALE RD. SCHERTZ, TX 78154 DEED NUMBER: Land Use: REQUESTED ZONING BOUNDARY O.P.R.B.C.T. EXISTING CONTOUR LEGEND 200' NOTIFICATION LINE SCHERTZ CITY LIMITS 100-YR FEMA FLOODPLAIN ZONING LEGEND (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) (PDD)Planned Development (PRE)Pre-Development (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (GB)General Business NOTES: ACCORDING TO FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP PANEL 48029C0455G, DATES SEPTEMBER 29, 2010, IS LOCATED IN ZONE(S) A/E AND IS NOT WITHIN THE 100-YEAR FLOODPLAIN. THE THOROUGHFARE ALIGNMENTS SHOWN ON THIS EXHIBIT ARE ILLUSTRATION PURPOSED AND DO NOT SET ALIGNMENT. ALIGNMENT IS DETERMINED AT THE TIME OF FINAL PLAT. OFFICIAL PUBLIC RECORDS OF BEXAR COUNTY, TEXAS HARTMANN TRACT - POPPY HILLS SUBDIVISION ±78.96 AC. TO BE ANNEXED INTO THE CITY OF SCHERTZ PROPERTY BOUNDARY WHEREAS, an application to rezone approximately 362 acres of land to Planned Developme' District (PDD), generally located 6,050 feet east from the intersection of Trainer Hale Road FM 1518 also known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers, 310053, 310060, 3 100 and 310121, Bexar County, Texas, and more specifically described in the ExhibitA attachedhere* herein, the "Property") has been filed with the City; and 11-M-UMS-7 =117-r-1. I -- M7 =*1 to be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission in making recommendations to Ci Council and by City Council in considering final action on a requested zone change (t Criteria"); and I WHEREAS, on June 22, 2022, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council to approve th*- requested rezoning; and WHEREAS, on July 12, 2022, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the r-equested zoning be approved as provided for herein. BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS: THAT: Section 1. The Property as shown and more particularly described in the attached Exhibit A, is hereby zoned Planned Development District (PDD). WMAMS Section 3. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, anM such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 4. All ordinances and codes, or is thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repeated to the extent of such conflict, and the Ltrovisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of AAMM"" W11 6 1alid i and the Citv hereb R I I - MR.-MI-701 NIM6 rJPAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS IX1,111.im, IliMid Ltjmll A COMMENCING: At a found Yz' iron rod on the north right-of-way line of Trainer Hale Road, an 80- foot public right-of-way, at the southeast corner of a remainder of a 5.000 acre tract, conveyed to Bryson Kneupper Properties, in deed recorded in Volume 11355, Page 2475, and at the southwest corner of a 1,00 acre tract conveyed to Robert L. and Deborah K Wright, Volume 17409, Page 1329, both of said Official Public Records of Bexar County, Texas; THENCE: N 30024'26" W, along and with said east line, same being the west line of said 78 ' 146 acre tract, a distance of 817.93 feet to a found Y2" iron rod at the northeast corner of said remainder of 5.000 acres, at the southeast corner of said 144 acre tract, and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described tract; Transportation I Water Resources I Land Deveiopment I Surveying I Environmentala Ttelephone: 210-375-9000 address: 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 website: PAPE-DAWSON.COM SanAntonio I Austin I Houston I FortWorth I Dallas I NewBraunfels Texas Engineering Firm #470 Texas Surveying Firm #10028800 I T 1 74.477 Acres Page 2 of 3 THENCE: Along and with the south line of said called 144 acre tract, same being the north line of said called 53.28 acre tract, the following bearings and distances: S 59039'37" W, a distance of 1064.20 feet to a set Yz" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; Y7S r-, a a I 7Z-rYUFrfTTMrr2"TrM17M Pape-Dawson"; 5 53*07'49 W, a distance of 163.88 feet to a set Yz" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; S 68*5210 W, a distance • 80.64 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped Pape-Dawson"; N 19*46'14" W, a distance • 119.14 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; S 73*3020" W, a distance of 440.97 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; N 58*0•'40" W, a distance of 113.89 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; S 30043'11" W, a distance • 331.94 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; S 47*28'40" W, a distance of 73.91 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped Pape-Dawson"; S 60*39'30" W, a distance of 190.64 feet to a found Y2" iron rod at the northwest corner of said called 53.28 acre tract, at the northeast corner • a 10.013 acre tract, r"wep-d tn—M in deed recorded in Document No. 20190008091.. of said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 59*49'38" W, along and with the north line of said 10.013 acre tract, same being the south line of said called 144 acre tract, a common line, a distance of 66.70 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; THENCE: Departing said common line, over and across said called 144 acre tract the following bearings and distances: r1iPAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS M , 74 .477 Acres Page 3 of 3 N 11'02'47" W, a distance of 673.97 feet to a set Y2." iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson"; n 5-5 -Z7 TK, -Te7r1i iron Foa pe-Dawson"; Aw•' sfampe • Pape-Dawson"; III-S'C-I/Wtl—'T,T,—a-di-sTa-n-ce ot 74.41 teet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stampe,# Pape-Dawson"; N 56*49'29" W, a distance of 326.34 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson" on the north line of said called 144 acre tract, same being the south line of a portion of Lot 1, conveyed to Phillip Sweet, in deed recorded in Volume 17967, Page 1563, of said Official Public Records, a common line, THENCE: N 59'2825" E, along and with said common line, a distance of 820.45 feet to a found 2" iron pipe at the southeast corner • said portion of Lot 16, same being the southwest corner of a called 17.27 acre tract, conveyed to Daniel 0. Corrigan, in deed recorded in Volume 15676, Page 2488 of said Official Public Records; THENCE: 5 30'19'51" E, along and with the east line of said called 144 acre tract, same beht.i r tI PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS 5111 ii P1121 1 1 BEGINNING: At a found Y2" iron rod with a cap marked "Baker" • the north right-of-way line Trainer Hale Road, at the southeast corner of said called 78.2•4 acre tract, and at the southwest corner of a 68.146 acre tract conveyed to Charles Luensmann in deed recorded in Volume 10175, Page 534 • said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 59'01'17" W, along and with said north right-of-way line, a distance of 1470.42 feet a found Y2 iron rod at a southwest corner • said called 78.2 4 acre tract, same being the southeast corner of a 1.00 acre tract conveyed to Robert L. & Deborah K Wright, in deed recorded in Volume 17409, Page 1329 of said Official Public Records; THENCE: N 30'2646" W, along and with a west line • said called 78.294 acre tract, samn] being the east line of said 1.00 acre tract, a distance of 208.38 feet to a found Y iron rod at an interior corner of said called 78,294 acre tract, same being th northeast corner • said 1.00 acre tract; Transportation I Water Resources I Land Development I surveying I Environmental San Antonio I Austin I Houston I Fort worth I Dallas I New Braunfels Texas Engineering Firm #470 Texas Surveying Firm #10028800 MA911"MR19MV 78. 294 Acres Page 2 of 2 THENCE: N 59*43'43" E, along and with the north line of said 78.294 acre tract, a distance of 1676.34 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson" at the northeast corner of said called 78.294 acre tract, at the northwest corner of said 68.146 acre tract; PREPARED BY: Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. DATE: April 2022 JOB NO. 30037-00 C. ID. N:\CIVIL\30037-00\Word\30037-00 78.294AC.docx rXiPAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS rI PAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS THENCE: N 30*26'31" W, departing said north right-of-way line, along and with the east line of said called 78.146 acre tract, same being the west line of called 68.146 acre tract, a distance of 2048.18 feet to a found Y2" iron rod • the south line of said remainder of 188.68 acres and to the POINT • BEGINNING of the herein described tract; THENCE: Along and with the east line of said called 17.27 acre tract ' same being west lin'.- of said remainder of a 188.68 acre tract, the following bearings and distances: Transportation I Water Resources I Land Development I Surveying I Environmental telephone: 210-375-9000 address: 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 well PAPS - DAWSON.COM San Antonio I Austin I Houston I Fort Worth I Dallas I New Braunfels Texas Engineering Firm 0470 Texas Surveying Firm #10028800 YjTjWTjMFj7f7jiP "I 165.410 Acres Page 2 of 3 N 31 ®26'12" W, a distance of 1039 ®0 feet to a fence post; N 73'14'37" W, a distance of 373067 feet to a fence post; S 81'06'40" W, a distance of 329.41 feet to a fence post at the southwest corner of said called 188.68 acre tract and northwest corner of said 17.27 acre tract, both lying on the east line of Lot 17, conveyed to Thomas H. Williams in deed recorded in Volume 10847, Page 1809, of said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 32016'11" E, along and with said west line, a distance of 20.32 feet to a found Y2" iroY rod with an aluminum cap at the northeast corner of a remainder of 5,767 acre tract, conveyed to Betty Jean Wiederstein, recorded in Volume 17890, Page 2269, and in Volume 5261, Page 231, both of said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 56*09'27" W, along and with the north line of said remainder of 5,767 acres, a distance of feet, to a point at the northeast corner of a 1.393 acre trac conveyed to Hoover Edwards, in deed recorded in Volume 8227, Page 351, of said Official Public Records, for a total distance of 278.34 feet to a found %" iron rod at the northwest corner of said 1.393 acre tract; THENCE: 5 29'23'13" E, along and with an east line of said called 188.68 acre tract and the west line of said 1,393 acre tract, a distance of 321.87 feet to a found Y2" iron rod at the southwest corner of said 18393 acre tract, same being an interior corner of said remainder of 5.767 acre tract, roxoi PAPE-DAWSON M ENGINEERS r1 Page 3 of 3 THENCE: S 29'25'41" E, along and with the east line of said remainder of 50767 acre tract, a distance of 346.13 feet to a found Y2" iron rod; THENCE: N 65'12'00" E, along and with a north line of said called 188.68 acre tract, the south line of said remainder of 5.767 acre tract, a distance of 572.69 feet to a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson" at a north corner of said called 188.68 acre tract, the southeast corner of said remainder of a 5,767 acre tract, on the southwest line of said 42.116 acre tract; THENCE: S 68003'04" E, along and with said southwest line, a distance of 183.77 feet to a found Y2" iron rod at the southwest corner of said 42.116 acre tract, same being a northwest corner of Tract "B", conveyed to Ruth E. Martin in deed recorded in Volume 16034, Page 1089 of said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 51'58'59" E, along and with the east line of said called 188.68 acre tract the west line of said Tract "B", a distance of 1473.61 feet to a found Y2" iron rod on the north line of said called 68.146 acre tract; THENCE: S 59*49'51" W, along and with said north line, a distance of 362456 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 1650410 acres in the City of San Antonio, Bexar County, Texas. Said tract being described in conjunction with a survey made on the ground and a survey map prepared under job number 30037-00 by Pape- Dawson Engineers, Inc. OFPREPAREDBY: Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. t lz iDATE: May 2022 s JOB NO . . 30037-00 TOm HDOC. ID. N:\CIVIL\30037-00\Word\30037-00 165.423AC.docx ............MILO 6819 -11, a rdPAPE-DAWSON ENGINEERS BEGINNING: At a set Y2" iron rod with a yellow cap stamped "Pape-Dawson" on the north right- of-way line of Trainer Hale Road, an 80-foot public right-of-way, and at the southeast corner of said called 53.28 acre tract, same being the southwest corner of a remainder of 9.966 acre tract, conveyed to Gerald and Diana Vrana, in deed recorded in Volume 18990, Page 1515, of said Official Public Records; Transportation I Water Resources I Land Development I surveying I Environmental telephone: 210-375-9000 address: 2000 NW LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO, TX 78213 website: PAPE-DAWSON.COM Saga Antonio I Austin I Houston I Fort Worth I Dallas I Neer Braunfels Texas Engineering Firm #470 Texas Surveying Firm #10028800 R"IMMM51FIM 43.104 Acres Page 2 of 2 N 59*39'37" E, a distance of 1064.20 feet to a found Y2" iron rod at the northeast corner of said 53.28 acre tract, same being the northwest corner of a remainder of a 9,966 acre tract, conveyed to Gerald and Diana Vrana, in deed recorded in Volume 18990, Page 1515, of said Official Public Records; THENCE: S 30024'03" E, along and with the east line of said 53028 acre tract, same being the west line of said remainder of 9.966 acre tract, a distance of 1025060 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING and containing 43.104 acres in Bexar County, Texas. Said tract being described in conjunction with a survey made on the ground and a survey map prepared under job number 30037-00 by Pape-Dawson Engineers, Inc. RNY01a0 low" alls I Planned Development District Schertz, Texas April 2022 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. General .................................................................................................................. ..............................3 II. Zoning Districts (Article 5) ................................................................................ ..............................3 III. Special Uses (Article 8) ...................................................................................... ..............................3 IV. Site Design Standards (Article 9) ..................................................................... ..............................4 V. Subdivision Entry Signs (Section 21.11.15) ............................................................. ..............................5 VI. Adjustments to the Planned Development District ( PDD) ............................. ..............................5 Exhibit "A" — Metes and Bounds ....................................... ..............................6 Exhibit "B" — Conceptual Planned Development District Master Plan ............................18 Exhibit "C" — Proposed Subdivision Entry Sign ......................... .............................19 STERLING GROVE Planned Development District Schertz, Texas I. General The City of Schertz ( "City ") Unified Development Code (and as amended) will govern development of the Property, as further described in Exhibit "A ", unless provided otherwise in this PDD. Affected UDC Articles II. Zoning Districts (Article 5) A. Single - Family Residential District per the PDD The uses and street layout shall conform to the attached conceptual master plan as shown in Exhibit "B ". The PDD is comprised of suburban single - family residential lots, 0.5 acre lots and open space /parkland. The 0.5 acre lots will be subject to the Single Family Residential /Agricultural District (RA) standards unless otherwise stated in the following development standards. B. Single - Family Residential Dwelling Units per the PDD The PDD will allow six hundred seventy -two (672) suburban single - family lots and one hundred sixty (160) 0.5 acre lots. Of the 672 suburban single - family lots, thirty -five percent (35 %) will have minimum lot dimensions of 65' by 110' (SFR2). The remaining sixty -five percent (65 %) of the 672 suburban single family lots will have minimum lot dimensions of 55' by 110' (SFR1). III. Special Uses (Article 8) A. The Sterling Grove Subdivision will establish a Homeowners Association to provide upkeep within the development including the maintenance of common areas, open space, drainage, landscape buffers, and maintaining exterior masonry fences and /or walls. 3 IV. Site Design Standards (Article 9) A. Lots (Section 21.9.3) Lot sizes and dimensions will conform to the minimum requirements recognized in Table One of this PDD. Buildings constructed on irregular lots, including cul -de -sacs and knuckle sacs, shall have a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet. SFRl and SFR2 that have covered patios are allowed to encroach into the rear building setback 5 -feet. a. Maximum 672 lots will be comprised of SFRl and SFR2 b. 65% of the 672 lots will SFRl or larger. c. 35% of the 672 lots will be SFR2 or larger. 4 V. Subdivision Entry Signs (Section 21.11.15) UDC Section 21.11.15 is replaced with the following: Subdivision Entry Signs shall be monument like, signs located at the primary and secondary entrance(s) into the subdivision. An entry feature that is appropriate in scale to the size of the development and incorporating masonry walls, berms and/or decorative fencing, in combination with or part of the Subdivision Entry Signs, may be constructed at the subdivision entrance(s). Subdivision Entry Signs may include a maximum sign face /subdivision name identification area not to exceed two hundred (200) square feet per sign face. Each Subdivision Entry Signs may also include a logo in addition to the sign face /subdivision name identification area. The proposed subdivision entry sign will look generally as depicted in Exhibit "C ". There shall be no more than one subdivision entry sign per entrance. VI. Adjustments to the Planned Development District (PDD) Minor changes which do not change the concept or intent of the development shall be approved or denied administratively. Minor changes include adjustments to the acreage of phases and order of development. 9 w I 4Q22 Demographic Report 2 San Antonio Economic Conditions 3.1 13.1 3.3 3.5 3.6 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Unemployment Rate, Aug 2019 -Dec 2022 San Antonio Texas 2.9 3.1 3.3 3.3 3.6 3.3 3.3 3.3 3.9 3.8 4.2 3.7 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. Bexar Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Dec-21 Dec-22 © 2022 Zonda 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2012Q4 2013Q4 2014Q4 2015Q4 2016Q4 2017Q4 2018Q4 2019Q4 2020Q4 2021Q4 2022Q4 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual ClosingsSource: Zonda San Antonio New Home Starts & Closings Key Trends Starts: -9% YOY / -15% QOQ Closings: +7% YOY / +4% QOQ Starts Exceed Closings by 1,162 Homes 19,035 17,873 4 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family market-December 2022 5 Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD Housing Market Analysis Average New vs. Existing Home Sale Price, 2012 -2022 •Since 2012, the average new home price in SCUCISD has more than doubled, a rise of nearly $221,000 •The average existing home price within the district has increased by 87%, or more than $153,000 since 2012 Avg New Home Avg Existing Home 2012 $210,650 $174,468 2013 $231,997 $178,212 2014 $250,897 $187,097 2015 $262,532 $181,881 2016 $284,037 $189,189 2017 $297,182 $197,710 2018 $328,762 $221,637 2019 $314,299 $234,868 2020 $318,065 $247,691 2021 $345,858 $257,537 2022 $431,606 $327,526 $0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 New Home Price Existing Home Price 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –4Q22 * Based on additional Zonda Education housing research Rank District Name Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,858 3,985 3,066 6,340 25,851 2 COMAL ISD 3,187 2,976 2,685 4,175 24,094 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,135 2,001 1,431 3,993 27,451 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,157 1,691 1,544 3,533 26,459 5 JUDSON ISD 1,449 1,397 956 1,255 1,323 6 SCHERTZ-CIBOLO-U CITY ISD*979 960 746 1,833 7,001 7 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,107 843 860 1,926 10,350 8 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 740 806 544 1,087 6,483 9 BOERNE ISD 594 706 577 1,123 11,097 10 SEGUIN ISD 548 554 329 895 5,300 11 SOUTHSIDE ISD 448 422 285 1,148 10,138 12 NAVARRO ISD 642 398 467 1,635 4,660 13 NORTH EAST ISD 439 385 349 682 6,020 14 SAN ANTONIO ISD 238 308 220 375 999 15 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 269 180 198 176 637 16 LYTLE ISD 87 96 40 109 1,381 17 HARLANDALE ISD 40 76 27 14 144 18 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 59 42 68 93 22 19 JOURDANTON ISD 0 24 4 4 36 20 MARION ISD 24 14 30 340 4,388 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings Starts 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Closings 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 1Q 190 196 175 201 237 294 349 1Q 225 194 133 138 165 190 181 2Q 168 168 180 176 197 300 393 2Q 237 172 185 211 249 258 227 3Q 233 167 177 207 261 265 174 3Q 235 179 185 240 286 268 218 4Q 142 172 185 198 232 319 63 4Q 161 148 161 179 213 196 334 Total 733 703 717 782 927 1,178 979 Total 858 693 664 768 913 912 960 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 66 12 18 10 57 64 161 500 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 3 0 5 1 1 2 36 38 ROSE GARDEN 295 8 448 101 153 215 438 3,307 SCHERTZ 98 6 73 39 48 62 26 60 SIPPEL 130 23 175 45 94 118 696 1,526 WATTS 155 2 65 43 99 118 82 633 WIEDERSTEIN 232 12 176 95 126 167 394 937 Grand Total 979 63 960 334 578 746 1,833 7,001 Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category District Housing Overview •The district has 23 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 7 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on more than 1,140 lots within 12 subdivisions •392 lots have been delivered in the 4th quarter 9 Buffalo Crossing •1,230 total lots •493 future lots •101 vacant developed lots •37 homes under construction •586 occupied homes •Started 3 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 9 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on 95 lots in Phase 2 •$360K+10 Residential Activity Venado Crossing •507 total lots •364 future lots •17 vacant developed lots •61 homes under construction •53 occupied homes •Started 2 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 32 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on Phase 2 (53 lots) •$350K+ 11 Residential Activity Homestead •1,470 total lots •783 future lots •381 vacant developed lots •27 homes under construction •268 occupied homes •Started 2 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 6 starts since 3Q22 •276 lots in Phases 5 –9 delivered for homebuilding 4Q22 •Equipment on site for 62 lots in Phase 11 •$400K -$700K Saddle Creek Ranch •809 total lots •82 future lots •76 vacant developed lots •48 homes under construction •596 occupied homes •Started 8 homes in 4Q22, quarterly starts decreased by 17 starts since 3Q22 •Groundwork underway on Phase 9 (82 lots) •$290K+ •There are more than 550 multi-family units under construction •There are nearly 800 future multi-family units in various stages of planning across the district 12 District Multi-Family Overview 13 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2018/19 70 337 982 1,050 1,070 1,143 1,205 1,198 1,146 1,139 1,264 1,366 1,356 1,291 1,201 15,818 2019/20 86 327 1,048 1,036 1,093 1,125 1,184 1,211 1,234 1,183 1,180 1,419 1,340 1,282 1,224 15,972 154 1.0% 2020/21 77 248 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 -299 -1.9% 2021/22 78 377 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 67 369 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 67 414 927 881 997 1,049 1,143 1,133 1,099 1,159 1,249 1,476 1,457 1,297 1,225 15,573 52 0.3% 2024/25 67 428 954 998 910 1,049 1,122 1,161 1,174 1,123 1,178 1,419 1,455 1,365 1,267 15,670 97 0.6% 2025/26 67 454 1,007 1,036 1,032 960 1,117 1,142 1,191 1,195 1,140 1,331 1,384 1,366 1,330 15,752 82 0.5% 2026/27 67 477 1,061 1,086 1,068 1,082 1,019 1,138 1,178 1,220 1,214 1,295 1,310 1,302 1,334 15,851 99 0.6% 2027/28 67 477 1,062 1,142 1,114 1,115 1,133 1,039 1,173 1,201 1,239 1,376 1,271 1,231 1,271 15,911 60 0.4% 2028/29 67 490 1,090 1,118 1,171 1,170 1,179 1,155 1,069 1,192 1,220 1,400 1,348 1,194 1,205 16,068 157 1.0% 2029/30 67 493 1,098 1,147 1,154 1,228 1,236 1,202 1,191 1,087 1,211 1,384 1,375 1,267 1,168 16,308 240 1.5% 2030/31 67 498 1,107 1,158 1,184 1,209 1,296 1,259 1,239 1,212 1,104 1,376 1,357 1,292 1,239 16,597 289 1.8% 2031/32 67 506 1,125 1,168 1,197 1,243 1,279 1,320 1,298 1,262 1,231 1,256 1,348 1,276 1,263 16,839 242 1.5% 2032/33 67 512 1,137 1,186 1,207 1,258 1,315 1,303 1,361 1,324 1,282 1,398 1,232 1,266 1,247 17,095 255 1.5% 14 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 750 752 767 816 869 910 925 936 950 968 GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 576 549 536 535 559 574 585 593 594 591 NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 600 588 600 602 618 625 628 630 627 623 ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 963 1,010 1,062 1,099 1,149 1,201 1,254 1,292 1,333 1,368 SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 684 688 683 699 701 701 694 686 670 657 SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 749 745 771 802 845 873 904 927 953 998 WATTS EL 673 924 593 586 591 599 618 641 656 671 679 680 688 WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 571 606 655 690 728 745 762 776 778 788 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,406 5,478 5,528 5,673 5,860 6,110 6,285 6,423 6,519 6,585 6,682 Elementary Percent Change -3.40%1.34%0.91%2.62%3.29%4.27%2.86%2.20%1.49%1.01%1.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 72 50 145 187 250 175 138 96 66 96 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 775 827 822 857 844 859 932 977 1,030 1,056 SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 723 776 769 703 642 642 703 746 788 800 WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 734 732 742 756 726 723 758 775 800 808 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,200 2,232 2,335 2,333 2,316 2,212 2,224 2,393 2,498 2,618 2,664 Intermediate Percent Change -6.18%1.45%4.61%-0.09%-0.73%-4.49%0.54%7.60%4.39%4.80%1.76% Intermediate Absolute Change -145 32 103 -2 -17 -104 12 169 105 120 46 15 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2022/23 2023/24 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,311 1,235 1,242 1,329 1,319 1,267 1,193 1,204 1,312 1,386 CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,097 1,066 1,093 1,105 1,121 1,145 1,105 1,112 1,181 1,220 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,536 2,408 2,301 2,335 2,434 2,440 2,412 2,298 2,316 2,493 2,606 Junior High School Percent Change -2.65%-5.05%-4.44%1.48%4.24%0.25%-1.15%-4.73%0.78%7.64%4.53% Junior High School Absolute Change -69 -128 -107 34 99 6 -28 -114 18 177 113 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,613 2,626 2,566 2,513 2,454 2,433 2,484 2,524 2,491 2,530 STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,723 2,761 2,726 2,609 2,576 2,595 2,591 2,621 2,533 2,494 ALSELC 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 119 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,379 5,455 5,506 5,411 5,241 5,149 5,147 5,194 5,264 5,143 5,143 High School Percent Change 0.65%1.41%0.93%-1.73%-3.14%-1.76%-0.04%0.91%1.35%-2.30%0.00% High School Absolute Change 35 76 51 -95 -170 -92 -2 47 70 -121 0 DISTRICT TOTALS 15,521 15,573 15,670 15,752 15,851 15,911 16,068 16,308 16,597 16,839 17,095 District Percent Change -2.32%0.34%0.62%0.52%0.63%0.38%0.98%1.50%1.77%1.46%1.52% District Absolute Change 369 52 97 82 99 60 157 240 289 242 255 16 Key Takeaways Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD experienced record high new home closings in 4Q22 The district has 23 actively building subdivisions with over 1,800 lots available to build on SCUCISD has 7 future subdivisions with approx. 7,000 lots in the planning stages Groundwork is underway on more than 1,140 lots within 12 subdivisions Five year enrollment could exceed 15,900 15,521 15,911 17,095 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 17,000 17,500 Enrollment Projections FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (CURRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 6 A TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner CASE:PLRP20240154 SUBJECT:PLRP20240154 - Consider and act upon a request for approval of a replat for the Royal Manufacturing Phase III Subdivision Lots 3-6, Block 3, approximately 75.24 acres of land generally located 1,860 feet to the west of the Tejas Way and Doerr Lane intersection, also known as Comal County Parcel ID 474772, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. GENERAL INFORMATION: Owner: Schertz 312 LLC Applicant: Hollis Scheffler, Westwood APPLICATION SUBMITTAL DATE: Date: Application Submittal Type: 7/11/2024 Replat ITEM SUMMARY: The applicant is requesting to replat approximately 75 acres of land in order to subdivide 1 lot and establish four (4) lots. Royal Manufacturing Phase III Lots 1 & 2, Block 3 was previously recorded at the County. The applicant is proposing to subdivide what was previously Lot 2 into Lots 3-6. The subject property is currently zoned Manufacturing - Light District (M-1). UDC Section 21.9.3.J states: Every lot shall be provided with adequate access to a public street, either by direct frontage on such street, or by public access easement approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission. This replat is being heard by the Planning and Zoning Commission because two lots in the proposed subdivision only have access through a public access easement. GENERAL LOCATION AND SITE DESCRIPTION: This site is generally located 1,860 feet to the west of the Tejas Way and Doerr Lane intersection. ACCESS AND CIRCULATION: The portions of the proposed subdivision will have frontage along Tejas Way. There is a cross access easement that parallels the frontage of Tejas Way. The applicant is proposing Lots 4 and 6 to be abutting Tejas Way, and Lots 3 and 5 to be accessed through easements, if the Planning and Zoning Commission approves the subdivision in accordance with UDC 21.9.3.J. TREE MITIGATION AND PRESERVATION: The applicant is intending to remove trees and will be responsible for complying with Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 21.9.9 Tree Preservation and Mitigation. PUBLIC SERVICES: The site is serviced by Schertz water and sewer, Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA), CPS Energy, AT&T, Spectrum, and Center Point Energy. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS: The previous Royal Manufacturing Phase III Lots 1 & 2, Block 3 subdivision had an approved Subdivision Improvement Agreement that allowed the applicant to record the previous final plat. Any additional public improvements required for this subdivision are required to be installed prior to recording of the replat per UDC, Section 21.4.15. Water: The property will be serviced by the City of Schertz for water. A 12-inch water line runs along Tejas Way. Sewer: The property will be serviced by the City of Schertz for sewer. A 8-inch gravity line runs along the south of the property parallel to the Union Pacific railroad tracks. Drainage: The applicant is responsible for all drainage associated with the subject property, and for compliance with Stormwater regulations. A drainage report has been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Sidewalks, Hike and Bike Trails: Sidewalks have been constructed along both sides of Tejas Way throughout the subdivision. Road Improvements: Tejas Way has been constructed with curbing and sidewalks. Any further construction plans for public improvements have been submitted and reviewed with no objection from the Engineering Departments. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION: The replat is consistent with the applicable requirements, ordinances, and regulations for this property. It has been reviewed with no objections by the Engineering, Fire, and Planning Departments. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the replat as presented. Planning Department Recommendation X Approve as submitted Approve with conditions* Denial * While the Commission can impose conditions; conditions should only be imposed to meet requirements of the UDC. COMMISSIONERS CRITERIA FOR CONSIDERATION: The Planning and Zoning Commission is the final approval authority of the proposed replat. In considering final action on a replat, the Commission should consider the criteria within UDC, Section 21.12.13 D. Attachments Aerial Exhibit Plat Exhibit :17154 TEJAS WAY (PLRP20240154) U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U UU U !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P!P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P Pv t R d a t 1 8 9 5 4 F m 2 2 5 2 F M 2 2 5 2 N a c o g d o c h e s L o o p D o e r r L n D o e r r L n D o e r r L n L o o k o u t R d D o e r r L n D oe r r Ln 36187 8 DG IN D U S T R I A L P O R T F O L I O II PRO P E R T Y O W N E R L P 39113 5 GUSTA F S O N PARTN E R S I I L T D 40919 1 SUN L I F E A S S U R A N C E COMP A N Y O F C A N A D A 42704 3 SUN L I F E A S S U R A N C E COMP A N Y O F C A N A D A 10274 5 BALTIS S E - A C K E R M A N SCHER T Z L L L P 77739 SCHER T Z 312 LL C 77739 SCHER T Z 312 L L C 43880 5 SCHER T Z 312 L L C 43880 6 SCHER T Z 312 L L C 47477 1 SCHER T Z 312 L L C 8 " W L 6"WL 3" WL 8 " W L 8"WL 1 2 " W L 8" WL 4 " W L 6" W L 4" W L 1 2 " W L 12" W L 8 " W L 12" W L 1 2 " W L 12" W L 8" WL 12" WL 6"WL 8"WL 12" W L 12 "WL 8" WL 8" WL 6"WL 3" WL 8"WL 8"WL 8 " W L 8"WL 1 2 " W L 8" WL 1 2 " W L 8" WL 8 " W L 6" WL 12" WL 8"WL 12" W L 1 1 / 2 " W L 6" WL 6" WL 8"WL 6" WL 8" WL 8 " W L 2 " W L 8" W L 12" W L 12" W L 8" W L 12" WL 8 " W L 4"WL 8" WL 8" WL 8"WL 4" WL 1 1/2 " W L 4"WL 1 2 " W L 6" W L 2" WL 2" WL 8" WL 10" WL 6" WL 1 2 " W L 8 " W L 8 " W L 4" WL 1 2 " W L 8 " W L 3 " W L 2 " W L 8" WL 8 " W L 2"WL 2" WL 3" WL 1 2 " W L 8"PVC S D R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 2 6 8"PVC SDR 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 1 2 " P V C S D R 3 5 1 2 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PVC SDR 2 6 8"PVC SDR 3 5 1 2 " P V C S D R 3 5 8"PVC S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 D O E R R L N LOOK O U T R D B E N E K E IT H W A Y TEJA S W A Y NACO G D O C H E S L O O P P V T R D A T 1 7 6 1 5 L O O K O U T R D TEJAS W A Y Maxar, Microsoft, Esri Community Maps Contributors, City of New Braunfels, BCAD, Comal County, Texas Parks & Wildlife, © OpenStreetMap, Microsoft, CONANP, Esri, TomTom, Garmin, Foursquare, SafeGraph, GeoTechnologies, Inc, METI/NASA, USGS, EPA, NPS, US Census Bureau, USDA, USFWS 0 400 800 1,200200Feet Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Residential Collector Planned Residential Collector Planned Commercial Collector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" Unknown Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes [Ú CCMA Lift Station [Ú Private Lift Station [Ú Schertz Lift Station 3Q CCMA Treatment Plant 3Q Schertz Treatment Plant County Boundaries Schertz Municipal Boundary ETJ Parcels AREA TABLE LOT SF ACRES RE P L A T - L O T S 3 - 6 , B L O C K 3 R O Y A L M A N U F A C T U R I N G P H A S E I I I VICINITY MAP COUNTY MAPSCO PROJECT LOCATION COMAL 9800 HILLWOOD PARKWAY SUITE 250 FORT WORTH, TX 76177 817.562.3350 AREA TABLE LOT SF ACRES RE P L A T - L O T S 3 - 6 , B L O C K 3 R O Y A L M A N U F A C T U R I N G P H A S E I I I VICINITY MAP COUNTY MAPSCO PROJECT LOCATION COMAL 9800 HILLWOOD PARKWAY SUITE 250 FORT WORTH, TX 76177 817.562.3350 AREA TABLE LOT SF ACRES RE P L A T - L O T S 3 - 6 , B L O C K 3 R O Y A L M A N U F A C T U R I N G P H A S E I I I PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY 9800 HILLWOOD PARKWAY SUITE 250 FORT WORTH, TX 76177 817.562.3350 PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 08/07/2024 Agenda Item 8 A   SUBJECT Current Projects and City Council Status Update   DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The following is being provided for information purposes only so that the Planning and Zoning Commission is aware of the current status of new site plan applications, status of applications heard by the Commission and recommended for final action by the City Council, and the status of administratively approved applications.  NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS:   There were no new site plan applications submitted to the Planning and Community Development Department between June 27, 2024 and August 2, 2024.  CITY COUNCIL RESULTS: The following development applications were recommended for final action to the City Council.  Ordinance 24-S-22 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 498.2 acres of land to Single-Family Residential District (R-2) known as Comal County Property Identification Numbers 79004, 79006, 78976, 78960, 78957, and Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 68374, 61615, 68384, 68385, 68383, 61511, 61609, 68381, 68378, 68382, 68380, 68377, 61614, 63992 and to rezone approximately 132.6 acres of land to General Business District (GB) known as Comal County Property Identification Numbers 79018, 75449, 78923, 374148, 374146, 374145, 374144, 374147, 78218, 79009, and a portion of 79012, and to rezone approximately 262.9 acres of land to Manufacturing District- Light (M-1) known as Comal County Property Identification Numbers 79001, 78945, 78946, 75480, 78247, 79017, 75468, 75462, 75463, a portion of 79012, Comal and Guadalupe County, Texas.  Approved at First Hearing at June 4, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 2, 2024 CC Meeting Ordinance 24-S-24 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 2,030 acres to Single Family Residential District (R-2) known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310064, 1141730, 339772, 339773, 339744, 1050203, 340030, 339348, 339341, 339778, 310012, 309842, 339293, 339275, 339328, 1013798, 310222, 310026, 1274920, 339286, 310019, 1139530, 1056967, 339331, 1178480, 309427, 309425, 310006, 310125, 1056966, 312023, 310002, 310048, 1311565, 310022, 312015, 312017, 310126, 339290, 339288, 339790, 339334, 339329, 1140481, 310007, 312008, 309429, 1190132, 310032, 310090, 310107, 1103091, 1207560, 1103092, 1103093, 339325, 339276, 1178479, 310111, 310039, 339284, 310004, 309421, 309837, 340059, 339295, 309418, 339285, 310059, 310225, 310040, a portion of 339274, and to rezone approximately 10.1 acres to Neighborhood Services District (NS) known as a portion of Bexar County Property Identification Number 339274 and approximately 152.4 acres to General Business District (GB) known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 339359, 339362 and 339353, Bexar County, Texas.  Approved at First Hearing at June 4, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 2, 2024 CC Meeting Ordinance 24-S-140 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 1 acre of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 308497, more specifically known as 11639 Voges Pass, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.   Approved at First Hearing at July 2, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 16, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 16, 2024 CC Meeting Ordinance 24-S-141- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 3.6 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A), known as Comal County Property Identification Number 78940, more specifically known as 6691 FM 482, New Braunfels, Comal County, Texas.     Approved at First Hearing at July 2, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 16, 2024 CC Meeting Ordinance 24-S-142- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a convenience store with gas pumps on approximately 4.33 acres of land, known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number: 64548, generally located at the intersection of Maske Road & E FM 1518, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.    Approved at First Hearing at July 2, 2024 CC Meeting Approved at Second Hearing at July 16, 2024 CC Meeting Resolution 24-R-79- Authorizing the revised bylaws of the Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission, and other matters in connection therewith.  Approved at July 16, 2024 CC Meeting  Ordinance 24-S-144?- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a monopole telecommunication facility on approximately 1 acre of land, known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 47083, more specifically known as 120 Windy Meadows Drive, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas   Scheduled for First Hearing at the August 6, 2024 CC Meeting  Ordinance 24-S-145- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 3.3 acres of land from Manufacturing – Light District (M-1) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, a portion of the property also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas.    Scheduled for First Hearing at the August 6, 2024 CC Meeting  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED PROJECTS: The following were administratively approved projects from June 27, 2024, to August 2, 2024.   Forest Ridge Commercial- Site Plan  An approximately 29,745 square foot retail / restaurant building located at 4573 FM 3009. Approved July 10, 2024.  Parklands Subdivision Unit 3B- Final Plat   An approximately 11.95 acre final plat, creating Parklands Subdivision Unit 3B, which consists of 57 build-able single family residential lots.  Approved July 31, 2024.  Parklands II Subdivison Unit 4- Final Plat   An approximately 16.84 acre final plat, creating Parklands II Subdivision Unit 4, which consists of 62 build-able single family residential lots.  Approved July 1, 2024.