Loading...
PZ and CIAC 01-22-2025 Agenda with Associated Documents          MEETING AGENDA Special Session Planning & Zoning Commission AND Schertz Capital Improvement Advisory Committee January 22, 2025                                   HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 22, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. The Planning and Zoning Commission and Capital Improvement Advisory Committee will hold this meeting at 6:00p.m., Wednesday, January 22, 2025, at the City Council Chambers. In lieu of attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live stream on the City's YouTube Channel.          1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE SPECIAL SESSION PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING      2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.CONSENT AGENDA:     A.Minutes for the December 4, 2024 Regular Meeting.     5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.      Planning & Zoning                                   January 22, 2025 Page 1 of 3    A.PLCPA20250006 - Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans.   6.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:     A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda      B.Announcements by Commissioners  City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended      C.Announcements by City Staff.  City and community events attended and to be attended.      7.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR      A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update     8.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING      1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Committee of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.PUBLIC HEARING:     A.Hold a public hearing for a presentation, discussion, and possible action to approve a recommendation regarding an update to the City of Schertz Water and Wastewater Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plans, and Impact Fees to be assessed.     5.ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      Planning & Zoning                                   January 22, 2025 Page 2 of 3  CERTIFICATION I, Emily Delgado, Planning Manager, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 17th day of January, 2025 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code.  Emily Delgado, Planning Manager   I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on _____day of _______________, 2025. _______________title:_____________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619-1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.  Planning & Zoning                                   January 22, 2025 Page 3 of 3  PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 01/22/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Emily Delgado, Planning Manager SUBJECT:Minutes for the December 4, 2024 Regular Meeting.   Attachments Minutes for the December 4, 2024 Regular Meeting  D R A F T PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES December 4, 2024 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on December 4, 2024 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Clayton Wallace, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; John Carbon, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner Absent: Roderick Hector, Commissioner; Tamara Brown, Commissioner Staff present: Brian James, Deputy City Manager; Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Development; Lauren Shrum, Director of Parks, Recreation, and Community Services; Emily Delgado, Planning Manager; Samuel Haas, Senior Planner; Daisy Marquez, Planner; William Willingham, Planner; Sarah Rodriguez, Administrative Assistant              1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:00p.m.   2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Commissioner Wallace was seated as the alternate.   3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. Dr. Mark Penshorn; 8320 Trainer Hale Road   4.CONSENT AGENDA:   A.Minutes for the November 6, 2024 Regular Meeting.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to approve the consent agenda, seconded by Vice Chairman Richard Braud  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   5.PUBLIC HEARING: 5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests, specific use permit requests, and Unified Development Code Amendments within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.   A.PLZC20240256 – Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 26 acres of land, from Single-Family Residential District (R-2) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as a portion of Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 64640, generally located 78 feet South of the intersection of Savannah Drive and Irish Creek Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLZC20240256. Patrick Christensen, Applicant, gave a presentation. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:20p.m. Barbara Wargo, 3513 Blue Moon Spur Jill Moore, 3534 Woodland Farms Tim Dusek, 11517 Cypress Barn Michelle York, 3601 Sunglade Ranch Carolee Hinojosa; 435 Harvest Point Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:30p.m.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to recommend denial of PLZC20240256 to the City Council, seconded by Vice Chairman Richard Braud  Vote: 2 - 4 Failed  NAY: Chairman Glen Outlaw  Commissioner Clayton Wallace  Commissioner Judy Goldick  Commissioner John Carbon    Motioned by Vice Chairman Richard Braud to recommend approval of PLZC20240256 to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 4 - 2 Passed  NAY: Chairman Glen Outlaw  Commissioner Patrick McMaster   B.PLZC20240260 – Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 85 acres of land, from Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and approximately 55 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2), generally located 2,000 feet North of the intersection of Weir Road and Trainer Hale Road, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310048 and 1190132, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLZC20240260. Paul Landa, Applicant, gave a    Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLZC20240260. Paul Landa, Applicant, gave a presentation. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 7:15p.m. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 7:16p.m.    Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval of PLZC20240260 to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   C.PLZC20240285 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 20 acres of land from General Business District (GB), Agricultural District (AD), and Pre-Development District (PRE) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5), more specifically known as 5524 Eckhardt Road, also known as a portion of Comal County Property Identification Numbers 75449 and 78233, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas. Mr. Haas gave a presentation on PLZC20240285. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 7:26p.m. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 7:27p.m.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to recommend approval of PLZC20240285 to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Clayton Wallace  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   D.PLCPA20240300 - Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to amend the Comprehensive Land Use Plan by adopting the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan. Mrs. Shrum and Caitlin Admire, Freese and Nichols, Inc. gave a presentation on PLCPA20240300. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 7:48p.m. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 7:49p.m.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval of PLCPA20240300 to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   E.PLUDC20240298 - Conduct a public hearing, workshop and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs Mrs. Delgado gave a presentation on PLUDC20240298. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 8:12p.m.    No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 8:13p.m.    Motioned by Commissioner John Carbon to recommend approval of PLUDC20240298 to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Clayton Wallace  Vote: 6 - 0 Passed   6.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:   A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda Commissioner Wallace and Commissioner Braud made requests for a future Planning and Zoning Agenda.   B.Announcements by Commissioners City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended Commissioner Wallace made an announcement.   C.Announcements by City Staff. City and community events attended and to be attended. Mrs. Delgado made an announcement.   7.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update      8.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING Chairman Outlaw adjourned the meeting at 8:36p.m.   ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 01/22/2025 Agenda Item 5 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer SUBJECT:PLCPA20250006 - Hold a public hearing, consider and make a recommendation to City Council on an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans. BACKGROUND Necessary tools to guide the planning, development, and financing of water and wastewater facilities in the City of Schertz are up-to-date master plans for those utilities.  A master plan is built starting with a comprehensive assessment of the current state of a utility - in this case water and wastewater - with respect to its function and capacity.  Development of the master plans includes creation of models of existing facilities, evaluation of anticipated growth, and the identification of projects needed to expand and improve the systems and operations thereof.  The resulting master plans then act as guides for implementation of the needed improvements. The City is currently undertaking the process of updating its water and wastewater impact fees and as part of that process, updated water and wastewater master plans have been developed and are attached along with a report supporting their development. GOAL The goal of this agenda item is to have the Commission make a recommendation to City Council for adoption of the updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans which are supplemental to the City's Comprehensive Plan. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth.  Identification and execution of water and wastewater projects for expansion and/or improvements needed to support expected growth and continued reliable utility service for customers within the City's service areas is critical to the well-being of the community.  The Master Plans are important guides for that effort. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that the Updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans be recommended by the Planning & Zoning Commission for adoption by City Council to be part of the City's Comprehensive Plan. RECOMMENDATION Recommend that City Council approve and adopt the proposed amendment to the Comprehensive Plan to incorporate the updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans. Attachments 2024 Water and Wastewater Master Plan Report  2024 Water Master Plan  2024 Wastewater Master Plan  City of Schertz 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report Prepared By: Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. 215 Mary Avenue, Suite 309 Waco, Texas 76701 254-753-9585 January 2025 TBPE Firm No. 2614 Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .............................................................................................. 4 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................... 6 2.1 Data Review & Methodology ............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions ............... 7 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections ..................................................................................... 8 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates ........................................................................................... 11 2.5 Future System Modeling ................................................................................................. 12 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP ..................................................................... 13 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System .......................................................... 13 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP .......................................................................... 34 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP......................................................... 47 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System ..................................................................... 47 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation ......................................................................... 56 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs ............................................................... 58 5. CIP Cost Data ............................................................................................................. 67 5.1 Cost Data ........................................................................................................................ 67 5.2 Inflation Rate Calculation ................................................................................................ 68 5.3 CIP Projects Estimates of Probable Cost ........................................................................ 69 6. LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................. 74 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 1 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements ..................................... 9 Table 2: Population Projections ...................................................................................................... 9 Table 3: Housing Projections .......................................................................................................... 9 Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates ....................................................................................... 10 Table 5: Household Size Projections ............................................................................................ 10 Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections ........................................................... 11 Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ...................................................... 13 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ........................................................... 14 Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System ......................................... 18 Table 10: Well Capacities ............................................................................................................. 21 Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments ................................................................................... 22 Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities .............................................................................................. 22 Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities ............................................................................... 23 Table 14: Pump Capacities .......................................................................................................... 23 Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane.......................... 24 Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane ............................... 26 Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation ......................................................... 29 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation ...................................................................... 31 Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation .............................................................. 32 Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary ....................................................................... 35 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 37 Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 37 Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 37 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 41 Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 42 Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 42 Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 42 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 46 Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary ............................. 49 Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 51 Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties .............................................................................................. 52 Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions .................................................................................... 52 Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters .......................................................................................... 54 Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 55 Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins ........................... 56 Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections ...................................................................................... 58 Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities .................................... 59 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 2 Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities ....................................................................... 59 Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls ................................................ 60 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary ...................................................................................... 61 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 62 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 63 Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary ................................................. 63 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 64 Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 64 Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation .................................................................................... 65 Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation ................................................................................... 66 Table 48: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations ................................................................................. 68 Table 49: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 69 Table 50: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 70 Table 51: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 70 Table 52: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ............................... 71 Table 53: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 72 Table 54: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 73 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 3 List of Figures Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters ................ 15 Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters ................... 15 Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows ...................................................................................................... 16 Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model ........................... 17 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours ................................................. 20 Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours ................................................. 20 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures ............................................................... 25 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures .................................................................... 27 Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations ...................................................................................... 28 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation ................................................................................ 30 Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation ............................................................................................. 31 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation ..................................................................................... 33 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 38 Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels .......................................................................... 38 Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 39 Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels ............................................................................... 39 Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels ........................................................................ 40 Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 43 Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels ......................................................................... 43 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 44 Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls ................................................................................. 44 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels .......................................................................... 45 Figure 23: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System .................................... 48 Figure 24: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern .................................................................................. 50 Figure 25: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot .......................................................................... 50 Figure 26: RTK Method Parameters ............................................................................................. 53 Figure 27: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot ......................................................................... 55 Figure 28: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm ..................................................................................... 57 Figure 29: AACE Cost Estimate Clases ....................................................................................... 67 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Schertz (City) contracted Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) to analyze and update the Water and Wastewater Master Plan & Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The goal of this update is to provide a strategic framework for the City’s growth, development, and infrastructure enhancements over the next 30 years, ensuring that future investments align with the community's long-term vision and needs. A master plan serves as the City's guiding document for land use, zoning, utilities, public services, and economic development. This document specifically focuses on water and wastewater utility improvements that are required due to growth and various system needs. As part of this update, land use assumptions were developed based on past data from the City and Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) demographic databases. These assumptions then indicated where areas of residential and commercial growth are likely to occur as well as the projected increase in those areas as shown in the tables below. This data was applied to the hydraulic water and wastewater models which are discussed later in this report. Population Projections Population Projections (Cumulative) (1) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate - 1.8% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% Population 45,719 49,985 55,187 60,933 66,946 73,553 80,416 Total Increase (+) 4,266 5,202 5,745 6,013 6,607 6,863 Employment & Commercial Property Projections Employment Projections (Cumulative) Historical(1) 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(2) - 0.8% 0.8% 3.0% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% Persons Employed 21,437 22,363 23,288 24,213 27,305 30,397 33,839 Commercial Parcels 313 327 340 394 445 495 551 Total Increase in Commercial Parcels (+) 14 14 54 50 50 56 After developing the land use assumptions and identifying areas of growth, the existing water and wastewater systems were analyzed. The analysis for the water system model focused on meeting the Texas Commission for Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ) requirements for system storage capacity, supply, service capacity, and minimum pressure requirements for public water systems. For the wastewater system model evaluation, emphasis was placed on identifying sanitary sewer overflows at manholes and surcharged gravity mains. From the analysis of the systems and the growth identified from the land use assumptions, projects were proposed in the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). The CIP typically spans a 5- to 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 5 10-year horizon with longer term projections for major capital projects. These improvements are crucial for maintaining and enhancing the city’s infrastructure to accommodate growth and improve the existing system. High level estimates of probable cost for each CIP project were developed based on four industry standard price sources. For the 2030 and 2050 projects, inflation rates were calculated and applied in order to capture the increase in construction costs. These project costs help the City determine how much funding is required and determine if additional funding sources need to be identified. The updated master plan and CIP provide a comprehensive, actionable roadmap for the City’s growth and development, aligning infrastructure investments with community priorities and long-term goals. By adopting these plans, the City can continue to maintain and develop a reliable water and wastewater system for both the intermediate and future demands. JANUARY 2025 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 6 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Land use assumptions are required to be periodically updated in accordance with TLGC Section 395.052. These assumptions form the basis for analyzing existing and future water and wastewater needs based on growth projections. This section describes how LAN performed a land use assessment, developed growth projections, and applied this data to the hydraulic water and wastewater models which are discussed later in this report. 2.1 Data Review & Methodology 2.1.1 City Provided Data Data and resources necessary for LAN to assess current and future land uses, development projections, and Water and Wastewater service networks were provided by the City. Sources available up to December 31, 2021 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. The plan was modified based on residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. This includes the following: · GIS Shapefiles o Received by LAN in the December 2019 data package from the City  Shapefiles in this data package included: · Comprehensive Land Use · Zoning Ordinances · Water and Wastewater infrastructure · CCN Service Areas · Municipal Boundaries · Customer Meters · Subdivision Land Use Statistics · Residential Land Use Forecasts o Microsoft excel spreadsheet received by LAN in April 2020 from the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development. · 2018 City of Schertz Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map · 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumption Report by Freese and Nichols, Inc. 2.1.2 AAMPO TAZ Data Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) demographic databases were used to determine the City’s growth projections. TAZs are the geographic units used to inventory existing and future demographic data required for modeling purposes. TAZ data included 2020, 2025, 2035, and 2045 population, number of households, average household size, and employment inventories for the study area. Databases were downloaded from the AAMPO website in the form of GIS shapefiles and concentrated to correctly reflect the City’s extent. It should be noted that TAZ demographic data from 2020 was provided to LAN separately from the 2025-2045 projected demographic data. Because the 2020 data package was a direct result from the official 2020 Census and the projected data was calculated by AAMPO before 2020, LAN identified discrepancies in growth rates between the years 2020 and 2030 for population and employment. For the purpose of this Land Use Assessment, population and employment data between the years 2020 and 2030 was interpolated to reflect consistent growth rate throughout the 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 7 planning period. LAN has communicated with AAMPO about the data discrepancies and will update all projections accordingly for future system modeling. At the request of City staff, the projected growth rate for each 5-year period was increased by 0.1% to be conservative. These adjusted population numbers are presented in subsequent sections. 2.1.3 Planning Period This Comprehensive Land Use Assessment utilizes a 30-year planning period from 2020 to 2050. Because the AAMPO TAZ demographic data is limited to the year 2045, demographics were projected to 2050 by assuming the same compound annual growth rate (CAGR) established in 2045. 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions 2.2.1 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions by Freese and Nichols, Inc. The 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions Report identified land use assumptions and recommendations for the City over a 10-year planning period ending in 2027. Upon completion of this 2021 Comprehensive Land Use Assessment, LAN has identified that the following assumptions from the 2017 Report will remain true for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050: · Territories south of Randolph Air Force Base are impacted by restrictions based on Air Impact Compatible Use Zones (shown on the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map as Attachment 1). Restrictions include limits on residential development densities. · Continued commercial and residential development pressure in the North from New Braunfels will impact growth around the City. 2.2.2 Assumptions Made by LAN A series of assumptions in relation to the City’s land use and future development have been made by LAN after completing this Land Use Assessment. The following assumptions were made to initiate updates to the water master plan and CIP: · Land uses identified in the 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map were modified based on updated residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. It is assumed that these developments will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. The names and location of these updated developments are labeled on Appendix 5 and Appendix 6. · Land use data available up to April 8th, 2022 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. · New growth throughout the 30-year planning period will expand away from the City center, where the highest densities of development currently exist. · Continued development pressure in the North along the IH-35 corridor and from New Braunfels will result in future residential and commercial development at higher densities throughout the north, than in the south. · Territories under delayed annexation agreements with the City will be annexed by 2025. The annexation of these territories will expand municipal boundaries. · Regions within Municipal Boundaries that do not currently lie within City water or wastewater Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN)s identified by the Public Utilities 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 8 Commission (PUC) are serviced by other authorities and will remain so throughout the 30-year planning period. · The existing water and wastewater CCNs will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections 2.3.1 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan The City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is included in this report as Appendix 1 and serves as a provisional guideline for future development across the City. The land uses identified in the 2018 map provide a framework that will be reflected by the City’s future development decisions. The exception is the area south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518. Recent land use plan amendments in this area include zoning changes based on data available up to October 1st, 2022. 2.3.2 Zoning The City’s existing zoning ordinances are included in this report as Appendix 2. The existing zoning ordinances were published in 2019 and serve as a means for which the 2018 Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan will be implemented. Based on land use data available up to October 1st, 2022 (including residential subdivision development information received from the City), the 2019 zoning designations were updated. It is assumed for the purposes of this study, that the zoning identified in Attachment 2 will remain in place for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050 apart from areas south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518 and areas just north of Trainer Hale Rd which are already approved for rezoning as of May 26, 2022. All existing and future subdivisions are shown in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.3 Delayed Annexation Agreements Zoning ordinances were used to locate territories around the City under delayed annexation agreements. Territories under delayed annexation agreements currently exist within zones of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), which constrain the City’s growth. These territories are primarily located throughout the Northeast corner of the City extending toward New Braunfels and in the Southeast between FM 1518 and IH-10. 2.3.3.1 Annexation Schedule The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with timelines for completing existing annexation agreements. The City Plans for the existing annexations to be completed by 2025. 2.3.3.2 Supported Land Uses of Territories to be Annexed Table 1 summarizes the supported land uses of the territories under delayed annexation agreements. The annexation data provided to LAN was geographically categorized between the north and south. The location of the areas under a delayed annexation agreement is illustrated in Appendix 2 and the supported land uses for future development of these area is presented in Appendix 9 & 10. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 9 Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements Delayed Annexation Agreements: Parcel Land Use Supported Land Uses(1) Total Parcels Total Acreage Single-Family Residential Lots Allowed Commercial Parcels North Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 43 1,037 822 2 South Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 86 3,110 2,000 5 (1)For the purpose of this assessment, single-family residential land use includes Agricultural Conservation, Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and Estate Neighborhood 2.3.4 Population Projections Table 2 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize population projections over the 30- year planning period ending in 2050. Combining these projections with development anticipated as of October 1st, 2022, Projections suggest that population is expected to steadily increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.%. Appendix 3 presents 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) population distribution across the City, reflecting the population increase provided in Table 2. Table 2: Population Projections Population Projections (Cumulative) (1) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate - 1.8% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% Population 45,719 49,985 55,187 60,933 66,946 73,553 80,416 Total Increase (+) 4,266 5,202 5,745 6,013 6,607 6,863 (1)Total population accounts for areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2.3.5 Residential Land Use Table 3 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize projections for the total number of households over the 30-year planning period. Future residential development across the City is expected to reflect population growth and increased traffic along IH-35. The number of households is expected to increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average CAGR of 2.2%. 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) residential housing distribution across the City are shown in Appendix 4. Because AAMPO TAZ data does not categorize residence type, the housing projections include both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 3: Housing Projections Housing Projections (Cumulative) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(1)(2) - 3.2% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% Households 15,441 18,034 20,305 22,640 25,120 27,735 30,742 Total Increase (+) 2,593 2,271 2,335 2,480 2,615 2,737 (1)Total number of households accounts for all categories of residential housing units throughout the City (2)Total number of households accounts for all residential housing units located within areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 10 The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with maximum build- out estimates for existing and planned single-family and multi-family residential developments throughout the City. Appendix 5 & 6 shows the location and density of these subdivisions in comparison to the Wastewater and Water Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCNs) service areas. Appendix 5 & 6 serves as an exhibit of where the City is allowed to provide services and where their population may be distributed. Table 4 summarizes the maximum build-out estimates. According to this data, approximately 90% of the existing and planned residential developments are single-family residential. Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates Residential Type Land Use Statistics Single-Family Multi-Family Number of Households Expected at Maximum Build-Out for Existing and Planned Subdivisions(2) 20,102 3,339 (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2.3.5.1 Single-Family Residential Development The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates that single-family is the primary type of residential land use throughout the City. Over the 30-year planning period, development pressure along IH-35 and from New Braunfels will impact the distribution of residences across the City. Single-family housing density is expected to be higher in the north throughout this corridor. However, in the southern portion of the City, west of FM 1518, residential development will primarily consist of lower density rural and estate style subdivisions. It is anticipated that additional single-family development will occur east of FM 1518 based on recent requested and authorized zoning changes. 2.3.5.2 Multi-Family Residential Development Currently, multi-family residential establishments are located centrally in the City and account for a small percentage of the City’s residential type land uses. While the number single-family residences will continue to dominate over the 30-year planning period, data provided by the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development notes a few new multi-family residential subdivisions have been planned. These developments are primarily located in the northeast between IH-35 and the Schertz City Limits, with one in the southern portion of the City. The location and density of these three developments are included in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.5.3 Average Household Size Table 5 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize the average number of persons per household over the 30-year planning period. Because AAMPO TAZ data did not categorize residence type, household size accounts for both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 5 indicates the average household size will remain close to three persons over the 30-year planning period. Table 5: Household Size Projections Average Household Size Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Persons(1)(2) 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 (1)All categories of residential housing throughout the City are accounted for (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 11 2.3.6 Commercial Land Use The Comprehensive Land Use Plan implies that commercial type land uses will continue to exist primarily along major thoroughfares in the north surrounding IH-35, in the south surrounding IH-10, and centrally surrounding FM 3009. The number and location of existing and planned commercial-type parcels were provided by the City in the form of a GIS Shapefile, shown in Appendix 7 & 8. These exhibits show the Wastewater and Water CCN service areas, respectively, to compare where the City is allowed to provide service to where they can expect commercial development. It was determined that AAMPO TAZ data for the number of persons employed throughout the City could reflect the number of commercial-type establishments. The CAGR for employment was used to project the number of commercial establishments over the 30-year planning period. Table 6 summarizes the employment projections, CAGR, and anticipated number of commercial establishments. Increased traffic and population among the IH-35 corridor could result in a higher demand for commercial property development in the North. Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections Employment Projections (Cumulative) Historical(1) 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(2) - 0.8% 0.8% 3.0% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% Persons Employed 21,437 22,363 23,288 24,213 27,305 30,397 33,839 Commercial Parcels 313 327 340 394 445 495 551 Total Increase in Commercial Parcels (+) 14 14 54 50 50 56 (1)Employment and commercial projections include areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for which growth is constrained 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates The City’s existing Water and Wastewater certificates of convenience and necessity (CCNs) identified by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) were reviewed to identify areas the City is currently serving as well as resolve where the City may be servicing outside their PUC identified CCN boundaries. Per correspondence on August 11, 2021, it was decided that the current water and wastewater CCN service areas would remain unchanged for the 30-year planning period. This conservative approach would allow the City to monitor potential CCN changes as development occurs and to adapt using the 5-year impact fee cycle in lieu of wholesale CCN change assumptions for the next 30 years. The City is aware that some regions within their municipal City Limits currently exist outside their water and wastewater CCN service areas and will remain under the service of their existing providers throughout the 30-year planning period. Likewise, regions annexed into the City during the 30-year planning period will not be added to the City’s water and wastewater CCN service areas if they are not currently located within the service areas. The existing water and wastewater CCN service areas can be seen in Appendix 9 & 10. These exhibits present the land use categories used in the development of population projection allocations, calculations of future demands, and wastewater loading development. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 12 2.5 Future System Modeling To develop future conditions for water and wastewater system modeling the existing system models will be modified to reflect the assumptions made in this report. Assumptions and projections made for City growth, land uses, and development are used to establish and allocate future demands and supply requirements for the required planning period. In general, the expansion of Municipal Boundaries throughout the planning period will result in City-wide growth and the extension of water and wastewater service networks. Projected residential and commercial development throughout the planning period will produce increased water and wastewater flows. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 13 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System This section provides an overview of the existing system model evaluation and the assessment of the results against the TCEQ requirements for system storage capacity, supply, service capacity, and minimum pressure requirements for public water systems. 3.1.1 Updates to Existing System Model LAN built a hydraulic model of the City’s existing water distribution system in Bentley’s WaterGEMS software using data provided by the City. The model and the Technical Memo with model build details and preliminary model verification results for the existing system were presented to the City at a review meeting on September 10, 2020. After the existing water system review meeting on September 10, 2020, the following items were updated in the hydraulic model to better reflect existing conditions: · Wholesale Customer Demands · Residential Water Usage Patterns · Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings · Removal of Waterlines Not in Service 3.1.1.1 Wholesale Customer Demands Meter usage data from the City of Selma and City of Cibolo was provided to LAN by the City and were used to identify average and peak day demands at the wholesale customers’ meters. Average day demands and peak day demands were input into the existing system model at each customer meter location and are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8, respectively. Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 14 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 3.1.1.2 Residential Water Usage Patterns During the review of the existing system model with the City, it was noted that the residential water usage patterns did not reflect the observed peak hour usage for the Schertz water system. With only monthly flow monitoring data available from the City, updated representative average day and peak day water usage patterns for residential customers was developed using an American Water Works Association report. The updated water usage patterns were developed using the 1993 American Water Works Association (AWWA) Residential Water Use Patterns report using data. The City of Norman, Oklahoma was selected to best represent residential water use patterns for the City of Schertz because of similarities in annual precipitation, average seasonal temperatures, and land use. The AWWA report provided separate usage pattern for both single and multi-family land use types and these patterns were used to update the residential and apartment demands in the existing system model. The average day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use were developed using the Norman info provided in the 1993 report. The average to peak multipliers, used to develop the peak day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use, were calculated using the 36 months of billing data provided to LAN by the City. These average to peak multipliers are: · Single-Family = 3.2 · Multi-Family = 2.6 The Single-Family and Multi-Family average day and peak day diurnal curves used in the existing system model are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 15 Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 16 3.1.1.3 Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings Comments provided by the City describe that the PRVs separating the Live Oak and I-35 pressure planes do not open under typical average day conditions but do open under peak day conditions. The City indicated that under peak day conditions these valves open around 4:30 am and stay open until around midnight. To simulate these conditions, the assumption was made that, all PRVs were given the same pressure setting. On the Live Oak side of the pressure plane boundary, under peak day conditions, and with all the valves closed, observed pressures at the PRVs averaged 67-psi. Therefore, a pressure setting of 67- psi was tested in the model to see if the PRVs would open during the simulation in the window of time provided by the City. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway is at a lower elevation of 713-ft (approximately 14 feet lower than the other PRVs). It was assumed that it was unlikely to open in tandem with the other four PRVs on this pressure plane boundary. The results showed all PRVs were open during a window of time similar to the one provided by the City, except the PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway as assumed. Flow through the four PRVs that opened throughout a 24-hour EPS peak day scenario at a pressure setting of 67-psi is shown in Figure 3. The PRVs shown in Figure 3 are primarily open between 4:30 am and midnight. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway was not shown because it did not open at any time during the 24-hour EPS peak day scenario. Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 17 3.1.1.4 Removal of Waterlines Not in Service The waterlines shown in Figure 4 were removed from the existing system model. While the lines are planned, the City reported that these waterline segments designated as “Active” in the waterline shapefile, were not yet in service. They will be included in the future conditions model. Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model 3.1.2 Public Water System Evaluation Criteria To evaluate the City’s existing system model, criteria were developed in accordance with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Public Drinking Water Rules and Regulations for Public Water Systems found in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 290.D. The TCEQ Rules and Regulations provide minimum capacity requirements for public water systems. The rules and regulations effective January 3, 2019 are applied in this analysis. Several of the evaluation criteria are calculated based on the number of connections in the existing system model. The City of Schertz reports 16,434 connections in the existing water system as of December 15, 2020. The City operates their existing water system as three pressure planes, Scenic Hills, I-35, and Live Oak. For the purposes of this evaluation the system will be assessed as one contiguous network because of the interactions between the existing pressure planes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 18 Extended period simulations were performed using Bentley’s WaterGEMS software which provided the tools and results necessary to assess the existing system model according to the TCEQ criteria for the following: · 24-hour Average Day Flow (ADF) · 24-hour Peak Day Flow (PDF) · 48-hour Peak Daily Plus Fire Flow Analysis The key criteria for the City’s existing system are summarized in Table 9. Detailed results for the evaluation criteria are discussed in the order as they appear in Table 9 throughout this section. Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 19 3.1.2.1 Supply & Storage TAC 290.45.a “Sources of supply, both ground and surface, shall have a safe yield capable of supplying the maximum daily demands of the distribution system during extended periods of peak usage and critical hydrologic conditions. The pipelines and pumping capacities to treatment plants or distribution systems shall be adequate for such water delivery. Minimum capacities required are specified in §290.45 (relating to Minimum Water System Capacity Requirements).” A 24-hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario, beginning at midnight, was run for the existing system under peak day conditions. Over the 24-hour simulation, it was observed that both the I-35 elevated storage tank (EST) and the Live Oak ground storage tank (GST) water supply did not recover to at least the same percent full as it was set to at the beginning of the simulation. Figure 5 shows the I-35 EST and Live Oak GST capacities over the 24-hour simulation. In Figure 5, the I-35 EST begins the simulation at 98% capacity and ends the simulation at 20% capacity. Likewise, the Live Oak GST begins the simulation at 83% capacity and ends the simulation at 56% capacity. Because the tanks did not recover by the end of the 24-hour simulation, the run time was lengthened to 48-hours to assess if the tanks recovered by peak hour (5:00 am) and if the decline in tank level continued throughout the second day. Figure 6 shows that neither tank recovers and the Live Oak GST almost drains completely by hour 48. The observed results indicate that the existing system model’s water supply would be incapable of supplying peak day demands for an extended period as stated in TAC 290.45.a. The City did not indicate that they have issues filling the Live Oak EST or GST as severely as seen in the existing system model. A meeting was held to discuss this issue, and additional information about the system and SCADA was provided to LAN. With this information, the model was re-calibrated, and the results more closely reflected what the Live Oak EST and GST were experiencing. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 20 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 21 3.1.2.2 Wholesale Supplier Requirements TAC 290.45.e “The following requirements apply to systems which supply wholesale treated water to other public water supplies: Wholesalers must provide enough production, treatment, and service pumping capacity to meet or exceed the combined maximum daily commitments specified in their various obligations.” “… minimum water system capacity requirements shall be determined by calculating the requirements based upon the number of retail customer service connections of that wholesale water supplier, if any, fire flow capacities required by chapter 290.46, and adding that amount to the maximum amount of water obligated or pledged under all wholesale contracts, if required.” The minimum required water supply is of 0.6 gpm per connections. For Schertz’s 16,434 connections this minimum water supply is approximately 9,860 gpm. The combination of water supplies is 10,400 gpm as shown in Table 10. · Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) is the main supply of water to the existing system. Based on monthly flow monitoring data provided by the City, the maximum daily supply (under peak day conditions) for Schertz from SSLGC is approximately 6,800 gpm. · Schertz Wells - There are two Schertz wells which can supply up to 1,800 gpm each. The wells supply water directly to the Nacogdoches EST under peak day conditions. Table 10 summarizes the system’s maximum supply which meets the minimum required capacity for existing conditions. Table 10: Well Capacities The City of Schertz provides water to two wholesale customers, the City of Cibolo and the City of Selma. The wholesale contracts with Cibolo and Selma do not specify maximum daily commitments. · Cibolo - from their wholesale water contracts with the City of Cibolo, the City of Schertz is to supply a combined total of 750 acre-feet of potable water per year, this includes 350 acre- feet of potable water per year designated to the Keli Heights Subdivision. 750 acre-feet per year is approximately 465 gpm. · Selma - from their wholesale water contract with the City of Selma, the City of Schertz is to supply a total of 800 acre-feet of potable water per year. 800 acre-feet per year is approximately 496 gpm. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 22 Table 11 summarizes contracted commitments to wholesale customers. Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments Under peak day conditions, the existing water system’s current available supply of 10,400 gpm (from Table 10) cannot meet the minimum required supply to the City (9,860 gpm) and its wholesale customers (961 gpm, from Table 11) which totals 10,821 gpm. 3.1.2.3 Total Storage Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must have a total storage capacity of at least 200 gallons per connection.” The minimum required storage capacity, at 200 gallons per connection, for the existing water system is 3,286,800 gallons. There are eight storage tanks within the existing water system: four elevated storage tanks and four ground storage tanks. The combined total capacity of the storage tanks is 8,500,000 gallons, meeting the minimum storage capacity requirement. Table 12 summarizes storage tank capacities. Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.4 Elevated Storage Tank Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must meet the following requirements: Have an elevated storage tank capacity of 100 gallons per connection or a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection. An elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection is required for systems with more than 2,500 connections.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required EST capacity, at 100 gallons per connection, is 1,643,400 gallons. There are four ESTs within 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 23 the existing water system with a combined storage capacity of 4,000,000 gallons, meeting the minimum required EST capacity. Table 13 summarizes the existing water system elevated storage tank maximum capacities. Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.5 Pumping Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For systems which provide an elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, two service pumps with a minimum combined capacity of 0.6 gpm per connection are required at each pump station or pressure plane. If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is 3,286,800 gallons. Schertz currently has 4,000,000 gallons of elevated storage within their system. Therefore, the minimum pumping capacity for the City is 0.6 gpm per connection based on the requirements. The minimum required combined pumping capacity for the existing water system, at 0.6 gpm per connection, is 9,860 gpm. There are four pump stations within the existing water system housing a total of 13 pumps. Table 14 summarizes the capacities of the 13 existing water system pumps. The maximum total pumping capacity of the pumps is 23,600 gpm, meeting the minimum required capacity. The firm pump capacity (with the largest pump out of service is 20,800 gpm which also meets the minimum capacity. Table 14: Pump Capacities 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 24 3.1.2.6 System Minimum Pressures TAC 290.44.d “… capable of providing a minimum pressure of at least 35-psi at all points within the distribution network” In coordination with the City, LAN made assumptions about the existing water system for the hydraulic model where data was limited. While the model indicates operations concerns in the water system, these should be field verified by the City. The existing system under peak day and average day conditions was evaluated in the model using a 24-hour EPS to observe system wide minimum pressures. The TCEQ required minimum pressure of 35-psi at all points within the distribution network applies to normal operating conditions (e.g. no fire flow or line breaks) and is used as the benchmark for assessing the observed pressures for peak day and average day conditions in the existing system model. Average Day Conditions Without detailed pressure readings across the service area, the existing system model can be used to approximate a system pressure. While the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi, the results from the existing system model indicate pressure concerns under average day conditions in some areas. Observed minimum system pressures under average day conditions are summarized in Table 15. Figure 7 illustrates the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under average day conditions. Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 25 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures While minimum pressures in the existing system model indicated flows approximately 1-psi below the minimum required pressure of 35-psi at the intersection of Ware Seguin Road and the Ware Seguin Plant and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST, the pressures were significantly above the emergency operations threshold of 20-psi. This is a small deviation and indicates additional data collection, and analysis should be conducted by the City for verification of operations. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 26 The Ware Seguin Plant low pressures occur near the end of the model day and could be related to the storage/capacity issues referenced above. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. Peak Day Conditions Under peak day conditions, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi. This is illustrated on Figure 8 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing water system under peak day demand conditions. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed, along Ware Seguin Road and near the I-35 EST at Pecan Street. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. These locations are noted on Figure 8. Pressures were below the required 35-psi minimum, as well as the below the 20-psi emergency operations minimum along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. There are two factors driving the low pressure at this location, first its elevation is higher than the surrounding area by approximately 40-ft and, second, at 5 am when this low pressure occurs, the peak residential demand overlaps with irrigation demand from the HOA meters in the residential subdivisions immediately to the northeast and southwest. These low-pressure results indicate additional data collection, and analysis should be prioritized. Observed minimum system pressures under peak day conditions are summarized in Table 16. Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 27 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures 3.1.2.7 Fire Flows TAC 290.44.d. “When the system is intended to provide firefighting capability, it must also be designed to maintain a minimum pressure of 20-psi under combined fire and drinking water flow conditions.” For conservative modeling purposes, the existing water system was evaluated for three separate peak day plus fire flow scenarios (one in each pressure plane) to observe any potential interaction between the pressure planes. Fire Flow simulations were run at a commercial meter selected to provide “worst case” scenarios within each pressure plane. These specific locations for fire flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 28 in each pressure plane were selected because its commercial meter was at a higher elevation than other commercial meter locations in the pressure plane and were not close in proximity to an elevated storage tank or pump station. A representative Fire Flow demand of 3,500 gpm was placed at the selected meter during the corresponding simulation. Simulating worst case scenario fire flow conditions for each pressure plane provides an analysis of how the pressure planes interact while under critical conditions. The selected locations for each simulation are shown in Figure 9. Fire Flow simulations were set to occur from 7 am to 10 am under peak day conditions. This creates a “worst case” condition where the fire flow occurs during peak hour. Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 29 The Scenic Hills Fire Flow simulation was placed off I-35 at a commercial meter south of Baugh Lane. For the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road, surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant, and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST. These locations are noted on Figure 10 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 17. Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 30 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation The I-35 Fire Flow simulation was placed near the intersection of I-35 and FM 3009 at a commercial meter adjacent to Corridor Parkway. For the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. These locations are noted on Figure 11 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 18. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 31 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 32 The Live Oak Fire Flow simulation was located at a commercial meter approximately 0.6 miles west of the intersection of I-10 and FM 1518. For the Live Oak Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the I-35 and Scenic Hills Pressure Planes do meet the minimum 20-psi. However, the observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi across the majority of the Live Oak Pressure Plane south of FM 78. These locations are noted on Figure 12 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. These results indicate additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 19. Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 33 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation 3.1.3 Recommendations For the TAC Criteria where the model did not demonstrate that the minimum criteria was met, it is recommended that the City take steps to verify the behavior of the water system in the field. This section presents the steps the City can take to verify the model observations. 3.1.3.1 System Storage & Supply Although the system meets the minimum total storage capacity, the existing system model results indicated that the system cannot supply peak day demands for an extended period of time. It is recommended that the City perform pressure and flow monitoring at all pump stations and ESTs concurrently for two weeks during a peak day period (e.g., Mid-August) to verify behavior of the water system under these conditions. It is LAN’s understanding that a second supply connection from the SSLGC will be connected to the proposed Corbett EST (located near the east dead end of Ray Corbett Dr.). This additional supply location and EST will be assessed in the Future System Evaluation effort. These future 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 34 conditions results will be considered when developing the final recommendations for storage and supply of the City’s water system. 3.1.3.2 System Minimum Pressure Requirements Because pressures below the minimum requirements for the average day, peak day, and peak day plus fire scenarios were observed in the existing system model, it is recommended that the City perform pressure monitoring at the locations were these low pressures were observed at the same time that the peak day period flow and pressure monitoring at the pump stations and ESTs is being performed. It is recommended that the data recording equipment used be set to record pressure and flow readings at least every 15-minutes. 3.1.4 Summary The results from this existing system evaluation were used to develop preliminary infrastructure and operational recommendations for near-term and future system improvements. These recommendations, in conjunction with currently planned improvements, are assessed in the future system evaluation and used in the development of the Capital Improvements Plan. Preliminary recommendation alternatives under consideration are (but not limited to): · Increase in water supply · Increased pumping capacity · Increased storage capacity · Changes to pump operating pressure controls or schedules 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP The following information, criteria, and constraints were used to identify and develop proposed water system improvement projects. · City direction for projects already in planning, design, and construction · Minimum pipe size of 8-inches · Minimum normal system pressure of 45 psi 3.2.1 Near Term System Evaluation Before proceeding to model future scenarios, the system was analyzed to identify improvements needed to solve present day system issues. This analysis is referred to as ‘near-term’ system improvements and accounts for projects which are currently under design or construction and other projects identified in the analysis to resolve existing system deficiencies. The near-term system water model was developed based on the existing conditions model previously developed. Projects which are currently in various stages of design and construction were provided by the City and implemented into the model. After implementing City-identified projects the model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 35 3.2.1.1 Fire Flow Analysis Fire flow analysis of the existing system was performed in the development of the “Existing Water System Model Evaluation” memo published January 2021. Projects to resolve fire flow deficiencies in the existing system were identified in the near-term system evaluation and are included in the recommended Near-Term CIPs and proposed Pipe Replacement Program. 3.2.1.2 Pipe Replacement Program In addition to the recommended CIPs identified in the model evaluation, the City also desires to replace undersized (≤6”) and asbestos-cement (AC) distribution pipes within their system. The undersized distribution pipes are unable to provide fire flow and reduce the system capacity. Undersized pipes are recommended to be upsized to 8” PVC, and the AC pipes greater than or equal to 8” should be replaced with PVC pipes of the same size. Based on the pipe attributes in the hydraulic model, there are approximately 280,460 LF of AC pipe in the system and an additional 175,380 LF of undersized pipe in the system. These pipe replacement programs can be established with a goal to replace a certain amount of pipe per year. A 20-year program would include an average replacement rate of 22,800 LF per year. 3.2.1.3 Near Term CIP Projects Recommended near-term CIPs are listed in Table 20 and illustrated in Appendix 11. Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes System Improvement Projects NT-W1 Bubbling Springs 6” WL Replacement City identified maintenance project. NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), currently underway. NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. NT-W4 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Currently underway. NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab Complete. NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt Currently in design. NT-W7 Graytown to Pfeil Currently underway. NT-W8 FM 78 Water Line Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W9 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W10 Robinhood Way WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. NT-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 36 3.2.2 2030 System Evaluation The 2030 planning scenario is the first future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2030 model, the near-term model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2030 project land use. The City identified projects that were not needed until 2030 were implemented in the 2030 model and additional projects were identified to meet the 2030 system needs. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2030 projects implemented. 3.2.2.1 TCEQ capacity Analysis An evaluation of the City’s system was performed to determine if the system met the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ’s) minimum pumpage and storage requirements as outlined in Chapter §290.45 of the Texas Administrative Code. A summary of the applicable TCEQ minimum requirements is included below. TCEQ’s requirements are based on the raw number of connections, which have been approximated based on the number of connections in the model and City GIS data. TCEQ Minimum Requirements: 1. Well Pump Capacity: Two (2) or more wells having a total capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection. 2. Elevated Storage Capacity: Elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection. 3. Elevated Storage Credit: If elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is provided, reduced service pumping requirements can be applied as discussed below. 4. Pressure Tank Capacity: For future systems, if elevated storage is not provided, a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection is required. 5. Total Storage Capacity (elevated and ground storage): Total storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, inclusive of the 100-gallon minimum requirement listed above. 6. Service Pump Capacity: 6.1 A minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 2.0 GPM per connection, except for systems meeting one of the two requirements below. 6.1.1 For systems that meet the elevated storage credit requirement listed above, a minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection are required for each pump station or pressure plane. 6.1.2 If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required. The City’s existing system is divided into three (3) pressure planes – IH-35, Scenic Hills, and Live Oak. For the TCEQ Capacity Analysis, IH-35 and Scenic Hills pressure planes have been grouped together as they receive water from the same supply point. The 2030 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 21, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 22 and Table 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 37 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Existing Number of Connections 2030 Number of Connections IH-35 + Scenic Hills 9,913 11,966 Live Oak 6,118 7,385 Total 16,031 19,351 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 22 and Table 23 below assume that all near-term and recommended 2030 projects are complete and in-service. Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 8,100 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,196,000 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 13,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 11,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 8,855 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 738,500 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 12,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.2.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2030 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. The Corbett EST is filled by the new Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 38 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST drains slightly during peak demand times of the day but is able to recover. Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 39 The Nacogdoches EST level fluctuates throughout the peak day simulation but is able to be filled with the well. Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST drains during the peak day simulation but is able to recover to initial levels around hour 27. Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 40 The Northcliffe EST levels fluctuate frequently throughout the day but can easily recover to initial levels. Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels 3.2.2.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2030 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes were selected at extremities of the system to represent the most conservative locations to achieve acceptable fire flow. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 12. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2030 system improvements. 3.2.2.4 2030 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2030 are listed in Table 24 and illustrated in Appendix 13. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 41 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2030-W1 New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF) Serves new service area. 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12” WL Improvements Serves new service area. 2030-W3 8” WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Serves new service area. 2030-W4 Trainer Hale Rd 2” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. 2030-W5 Boenig Dr S 6” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. 2030-W8 IH-10 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area. System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. 2030-W10 River Rd 6” WL Replacement Removes system bottleneck. 2030-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. 2030-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 3.2.2.5 2030 SSLGC Supply Need As part of the modeling effort, the water supply needed from the Schertz-Seguin Limited Government Corporation (SSLGC) was evaluated. Schertz is currently contracted for 5,801 gpm (8,351 acre-ft per year). An additional 3,799 gpm SSLGC water supply capacity for a total of 9,600 gpm is recommended to meet the 2030 projected system demands. 3.2.3 2050 System Evaluation The 2050 planning scenario is the final future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2050 model, the 2030 model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2050 project land use. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2050 projects implemented. 3.2.3.1 TCEQ Capacity Analysis The TCEQ capacity analysis was also performed for supply, storage, and pumping with recommended improvements through 2050 implemented. The 2050 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 42 current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 25, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 26 and Table 27. Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Number of Connections for TCEQ Capacity Analysis IH-35 + Scenic Hills 16,846 Live Oak 10,397 Total 27,243 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 26 and Table 27 assume that all near-term, recommended 2030, and recommended 2050 projects are complete and in-service. Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,684,600 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 16,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 9,400 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,039,700 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 13,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.3.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2050 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 43 The Corbett EST is filled by the Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST levels drop in the peak demand times but are able to recover to initial levels within 24 hours. Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels The Nacogdoches EST levels fluctuate throughout the peak day simulation but are able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 44 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST is fed by the new 2050 IH-35 pump station and is easily able to fill based on running the proposed pump station. Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls The Northcliffe EST level fluctuates frequently throughout the peak day simulation but is able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 45 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels 3.2.3.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2050 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes included all nodes included in the 2030 analysis with some additional nodes extending into new 2050 service areas. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 14. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2050 system improvements. 3.2.3.4 2050 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2050 are listed in Table 28 and illustrated in Appendix 15. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 46 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system 2050-W2 FM 2252 8” WL Improvements Serves new service area 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area 2050-W4 Beck St 6” WL Replacement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W7 IH-10 and FM 1518 8” Improvements Needed to meet growth in area System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8” WL Replacement Needed for fire flow 3.2.3.5 2050 SSLGC Supply Needs Additional water supply from SSLGC is needed for the 2050 planning scenario. A total of 16,965 gpm of SSLGC supply is recommended to meet the 2050 projected system demands. 3.2.4 Summary The recommendations provided in this section were a collaborative effort with City staff and LAN to identify and model water system improvements to resolve near-term problems as well as meet the needs due to projected growth for the 2030 and 2050 planning periods. The water model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and can be adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 47 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP A wastewater system model was created in Bentley Sewer GEMS by LAN using data provided by the City. LAN presented the model to the City during a meeting on September 10, 2020. Updates to the model were then made according to the comments from the City. To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a reliable hydraulic model is needed. Model reliability is developed through hydraulic model calibration. Model calibration and simulation were performed using Sewer GEMS software which provided the tool and results necessary to assess the existing wastewater system under dry and wet weather conditions. The purpose of this technical memorandum (TM) is to summarize the calibration results for Average Day Flow (ADF) dry and wet weather conditions and to identify areas with hydraulic deficiencies in the City’s wastewater system based on a design storm. 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System 4.1.1 Flow Monitoring and Rain Gauges RJN Group installed 15 flow monitors in the City’s wastewater system across a variety of gravity main sizes. The flow monitors recorded data in 5-minute increments from April through June of 2020. The goal of the flow monitoring was to record dry weather flows as well as wet weather flows during rain events. RJN also installed six rain gauges in concert with the flow monitors to collect the rainfall data. The rain gauges were located to capture spatial variation of rainfall across the sewer system in 5-minute increments. Appendix 16 illustrates placement of rain gauges, where the 15 flow monitors were placed in the City’s sewer system and the boundaries of the corresponding sewer shed basin for each flow monitor. A schematic network of the flow monitor basins within the City’s sewer system is provided in Figure 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 48 Figure 23: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System 4.1.2 Dry Weather Calibration Criteria The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for dry weather calibration effort: · The modeled and monitored flow hydrographs should follow closely in terms of the shape and magnitude. · Timing of the high and low flows from the model and the flow monitors should be within 1- hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 10% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 10% range. 4.1.3 Dry Weather Flows (DWF) Developing base sanitary sewer loads for each sewershed basin is an iterative process. First, preliminary base loads were estimated by applying Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) population and employment data to each sewershed basin. A unique gallon per capita per day (gpcd) was estimated for each basin using the TAZ data and the flow monitoring data. These gpcds were then used to calculate the preliminary base load for each basin which was input into the model. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 49 Second, Tuesday May 26, 2020, was chosen as the dry weather calibration day due to the lack of any rainstorms on that day and the consistency in the monitoring across all 15 of the flow monitors within this 24-hour period. Next, a 24-hour Extended Period Simulation was run in the model and the results were compared to the flow monitoring data collected on the chosen dry weather calibration day. Based on this comparison, adjustments were made to the base load and diurnal pattern for each basin until the model results met the dry weather calibration criteria. Some adjustments to the preliminary sanitary loading were significant because the TAZ polygon data which were used to calculate the initial base load estimates are on a large scale. These adjustments were needed to represent the density of load distribution more accurately in the system. To further refine the sanitary loading in the system, point loads were applied to represent significantly large contributors such as apartment buildings or schools. A summary of the adjustments made per basin is provided in Table 29. Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary Figure 24 provides an example of a diurnal pattern developed for flow monitor basin FM-12. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 50 Figure 24: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern 4.1.4 Dry Weather Calibration Results The dry weather calibration was an iterative process involving adjustment of base sanitary loadings, diurnal curves, and point loads. Eventually, the adjustment process produced results that fit the calibration criteria. Figure 25 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled dry weather flows (FM-06). Graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are provided in Appendix 17. Figure 25: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 51 Table 30 shows the dry weather calibration results for the 15 flow monitoring locations. Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results As shown in Table 30, dry weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There are few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the criteria described above. Those basins are FM-03, FM-08, FM-10, and FM-11. All these basins have lift stations upstream of the monitoring locations which directly affect the model results. For basins FM-03 and FM-11, assumptions were made for the lift stations within the basin. Those assumptions were provided in the Existing Wastewater System TM (September 4, 2020). The FM-08 basin has eight lift stations. Without accurate pump curves and pump operations for all the lift stations in these basins, the results are satisfactory with the current level of accuracy achieved. In addition to the City-owned lift stations in basins FM-03 and FM-11, there are several privately owned lift stations that contribute to the overall sanitary loadings in the wastewater system. Pump curves for these smaller lift stations were not available, therefore pump curves were assumed for modeling purposes. The following lift stations are privately owned: Aquatic Center, FedEx, & Fire Station 3. For Basins FM-06 and FM-10, calibration was performed by assuming sanitary loadings for business and institutes in the basins (see Table 29 for the specific adjustments performed on each basin). 4.1.5 Wet Weather Calibration Criteria Wet weather calibration is necessary along with dry weather calibration to adequately model the effects that rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDII) have on the wastewater system. The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for WW calibration effort: · The hydrographs (modeled and observed) should closely reflect the same shape and magnitude. · The peaks and troughs of the hydrographs (modeled and observed) should be within one hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 15% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 15% range. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 52 4.1.6 Calibration Rainfall Event Six rain gauges were installed for the duration of the flow monitoring period to record rainfall events. Review of the observed rainfall and flow monitoring data identified a distinct rain event with reliable flow monitoring data that could be used for wet weather calibration. Table 31 summarizes the rainfall event identified for wet weather calibration at the six rain gauges. Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties Because there were only six rain gauges for the 15 flowmeter basins, it was necessary to make assumptions as to which rain data to associate with each basin. Table 32 presents those assumptions. Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions In addition to the basins listed above, the SARA and Hallie’s Cove Outfalls were associated with RG-01 data because no rain monitoring took place in those areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 53 4.1.7 Wet Weather Flow Characterization To calibrate for wet weather, the RTK Method was used in the model to predict the sanitary sewer system’s short-, medium-, and long-term response to a rainfall event. These parameters, developed using the flow monitoring data recorded in the field, are applied in the model so that results are representative of field conditions. The R, T, and K parameters are defined as follows: · R - fraction of precipitation that enters the sanitary sewer system · T - the time to peak of the hydrograph · K - the ratio of the ‘time of recession’ to the ‘time to peak’. How these parameters are used to generate the short-, medium-, and long-term unit hydrographs used in the model is illustrated in Figure 26. Figure 26: RTK Method Parameters The RTK method creates a triangle from the three values with a separate triangle made for each type of response (short, medium, and long). The final hydrograph is represented by the addition of the three triangles. Therefore, this method uses a total of 9 parameters (3 RTK parameter sets for each of the 3 triangles that represent the short, medium, and long-term responses.) LAN assigned a RTK hydrograph to each of the flow monitoring locations that would represent the response to the rainfall. Then, iterative model runs were used to adjust the RTK parameters until the model outputs and flow monitoring were within tolerances specified by the calibration criteria. A 30- hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario for wet weather calibration was created for the following period: Sunday May 24, 2020, through 6:00 AM on Monday May 25, 2020. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 54 There can be some variations between a sewer’s diurnal pattern on a weekday vs. a weekend. Because the rainfall event selected to use for wet weather calibration occurred on a weekend, the flow monitoring data was used to develop an adjusted diurnal pattern that represents the behavior of system base flows on a weekend. The weekend diurnal pattern was applied to the base sanitary loads in the system for the wet weather calibration. Accurately representing the pattern of the base flow will prevent the over or under estimation of the system’s response to rainfall with the development of the RTK parameters. 4.1.8 Wet Weather Calibration Results Using the data from the six rain gauges, the flow monitoring data and the RTK hydrographs, the model was calibrated. With the rain data collected and assigned to the separate flow monitor basins, the RTK hydrograph values were estimated for each basin. Table 33 lists calibrated RTK parameters for wet weather calibration for each flowmeter basin. Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters Figure 27 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled wet weather flows (FM-06). Wet weather graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are shown in Appendix 17. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 55 Figure 27: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot Table 34 documents the results of the wet weather calibration for all 15 flowmeter basins. Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results Wet weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There were few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the wet weather calibration criteria. Those basins were FM-04, FM-11, and FM-15. Like dry weather calibration, inaccurate pump curves and pump operation for lift stations within these basins could adversely affect the model 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 56 results. In addition, FM-11 flowmeter data seems to be erroneous at some time periods. Looking at the FM-04 graph in Appendix 18 and comparing its peak flow with upstream contributing flowmeter basins (FM-12 and FM-13), the observed FM-04 peak flow (5 mgd) is lower than summation of peak flows at FM-12 (5.4 mgd) and FM-13 (0.75 mgd). In fact, summing up the observed peak flows at FM-12 and FM-13 (6.15 mgd) provides a peak flow closer to the modeled peak flow at FM-04. This discrepancy might be related to erroneous flowmeter data at FM 04 or there might be an unknown unmetered interconnect with leaving flows to another basin from FM 04. For FM-15, the observed flows at 5/25/20 from 0:00 to 6:00 AM seems too high, as the rain started to diminish around that time based on the recording at RG-03, which indicates flows cannot be as high as the FM-15 showed during that time period. 4.1.9 RDII Assessment The flow monitoring data for the calibration days were used to assess the sewer system susceptibility and response to RDII. Table 35 shows the wet weather peaking factors (peak WWF/average DWF). Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins Only FM-06 and FM-12 had substantial RDII response. The rest of the basins did not have significant RDII response based on the flow monitoring data for the calibration days. 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation 4.2.1 Design Storm To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the calibrated model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.3-inches. The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution type III. Figure 28 shows the hyetograph of the design storm used for this evaluation. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 57 Figure 28: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm 4.2.2 System Evaluation The 5-year 24-hour design storm shown in Figure 28 was then applied to the City’s calibrated model for system evaluation. The following criteria were used to evaluate the existing wastewater system and identify potential problem areas: · Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) at manholes · Surcharged gravity mains The majority of the SSOs and surcharged lines in the system are located on the 10-inch CCMA line which parallels Roy Richard Dr. and the 30-inch CCMA line which follows the drainage channel from I- 35 down to the outfall at Cibolo Creek. Some surcharging and SSOs were also predicted by the model in the Northcliffe area around the I-35 corridor. The extents and locations of these SSOs and surcharged lines for the existing system evaluation results are presented in Appendix 19. 4.2.3 Summary Using data collected from the flow monitors and rain gauges, the wastewater hydraulic model for the City of Schertz was calibrated for both dry and wet weather flows. The model calibration reached the required level of accuracy for both calibration scenarios. Further accuracy may be achieved with the provision of further data such as pump curve information and detailed customer sanitary sewer flow information for certain areas. Following the model calibration, the City’s wastewater system was evaluated based on a 5-year, 24-hour design storm for wet weather condition. The total number of SSOs found to be 21 (7 of these 21 SSOs are on lines owned by the City) which is less than 1 percent of the total number of manholes. The total length of sewer found to be capacity deficient (maximum flow greater than pipe full capacity) 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 58 was approximately 52,000-feet (of which approximately 22,500-feet is owned by the City). This is about 5.7 percent of the total existing conduits length. The next phase of the modeling process is a future model evaluation. This phase of the modeling includes running the model with population predictions based on the future TAZ population data and recommendations for future system improvements as part of the City’s capital improvement plan. This evaluation will be described in the next section. 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs The City contracted LAN to conduct the wastewater system improvement analysis and update the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). This effort requires developing a future sanitary sewer representation model of the City’s collection system based on anticipated growth areas. Future Average Dry Weather Flow and Wet Weather Flow scenarios for 10-year and 30-year were developed. The purpose of this section is to summarize the results of the future wastewater system improvement analysis and list the 10-year and 30-year wastewater system CIPs. 4.3.1 Future Modeling Methodology The future scenarios assumed increases in residential and commercial/industrial developments based on information about planned development projects provided by the City. LAN used the City’s calibrated model for dry and wet weather scenarios as the base for this analysis and allocated wastewater sanitary loads to the wastewater hydraulic model using the projected water demands developed for the Schertz water hydraulic model. To generate the sanitary loads, a return rate of 70% was applied to water demand at each node. Then GIS tools were used to determine which demand nodes fell within the existing wastewater service areas. If a demand node fell outside an existing service area, new interceptors were recommended to connect them to an existing or future wastewater treatment plant. Using Thiessen polygon and Loadbuilder tools from SewerGEMS, the sanitary loads were allocated to the nearest manholes in the model. Table 36 presents the existing and future average dry weather flow projections. Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections Future scenarios were created in the model for the 10-year (2030) and 30-year (2050) increments, along with their respective sanitary loads to simulate the future growth anticipated by the City. Diurnal curves were developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model and then used to distribute the future average dry weather sanitary flows over 24 hours. Analysis began on the 2030 scenario to evaluate the system and to find where the required improvements to the existing system are, besides any future projects to accommodate the new growth areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 59 4.3.1.1 Hydraulic Criteria Hydraulic criteria used for this analysis include capacity deficiency and design criteria. Capacity deficiency criteria identify the need to replace an existing facility, while design criteria determine the size of new facilities. These criteria were established based on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and engineering best practices. Table 37 lists a summary of capacity deficiency criteria used for the existing system in this analysis. Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities Table 38 lists a summary of design criteria used for new sewer facilities. Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities 4.3.1.2 Design Storm For wet weather scenarios, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.4 inches. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 60 The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution Type III, representing the rainfall temporal distribution type happening in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coastal areas (TR-55 Cover (hydrocad.net)). The same hyetograph in section 4.2.1 is applicable to this evaluation. 4.3.1.3 Inflow & Infiltration Assumption The RTK hydrographs developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model were used to represent the inflow and infiltration (I&I) for the existing infrastructure and service areas. In addition to utilizing diurnal curves to incorporate peak dry flow, a peaking factor of 4 was applied to represent the effect of I&I for future loadings outside the existing service areas where there is no historical data is available. The assumption was that new infrastructure would meet current standards and would therefore be less susceptible to I&I. 4.3.2 Future System Analysis & CIPs The following scenarios were created for future system analysis: · Dry Weather 2030 Scenario · Wet Weather 2030 Scenario · Dry Weather 2050 Scenario · Wet Weather 2050 Scenario Table 39 shows a breakdown of the dry weather flow projections for each planning period by the system outfalls. Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls 4.3.2.1 Near Term CIP Projects The near-term project list for Schertz provided by the City was incorporated into the existing system to create future scenarios along with future sanitary loadings. Each scenario includes all the currently planned projects that will be in place by that planning year. Table 40 lists currently planned projects (near-term) provided by the City (shown in Appendix 20). 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 61 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary It is important to note that the pipe size was undetermined for the Cibolo West Main Trunkline. Based on the available information and hydraulic model results, LAN recommends an 18-inch pipe size for the above project. In addition, LAN received the 2021 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan for the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. The CCMA’s CIP projects affecting the Schertz sewer system were also incorporated into each scenario based on the planning year. 4.3.2.2 2030 CIP Growth Projects The 2030 scenario included the currently planned CIP projects for the City. To serve the new development areas happening between 2022 to 2030, LAN proposes new growth CIPs as listed in Table 41. The alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment and are to be considered as preliminary. Final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 was used to size the new facilities. For modeling purposes, slopes for new growth CIP lines were assumed based on the TCEQ minimum slope requirement. At some locations, higher than minimum slopes were considered to prevent extra excavation. Appendix 21 shows the location of the 2030 growth CIPs. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 62 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary 4.3.2.3 Model Results Under 2030 Flows After bringing in the 2030 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2030 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 22. The results show 98% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5. It also shows gravity lines parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and upstream of the Friesenhahn lift station having maximum d/D of greater than 0.75, and gravity lines right upstream of Riata lift station having a maximum d/D between 0.5 and 0.75. This indicates these gravity lines (i.e., with maximum d/D greater than 0.5) may not accommodate the additional capacity needs from future flows and could require upsizing. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2030 wet weather flow (average dry weather plus 5-year, 24-hour I&I) was used to determine areas that are susceptible to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Note that the model shows SSOs at locations where the maximum hydraulic grade (HGL) rises above manhole rim elevations. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 23. The results show a total of 11 manholes within the existing service areas are overflowing. Per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37, the sewer system is capacity deficient at the locations where SSOs are reported by the model. 4.3.2.4 2030 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN proposes several system improvement projects listed in Table 42 to address the SSOs. In addition, Belmont Park lift station is set to go offline by 2030 per City staff. Therefore, that lift station was set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass it. LAN also determined that the Northcliffe (Town Creek) lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 4,800 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Appendix 24 shows the location of the 2030 system improvement projects. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 63 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.5 2030 CCMA Recommended Projects The results of the 2030 wet weather flow scenario showed some of the CCMA’s gravity lines have capacity issues that would affect the City’s sewer system performance. LAN recommends the following system improvement projects related to CCMA’s gravity lines (listed in Table 43 and shown in Appendix 24). Although originally listed as 2041 CCMA CIPs (Projects 2030 C-1 & 2030 C-2) and as Buildout CCMA CIP (Project 2030 C-4) in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. in 2021, LAN currently recommends these CIP projects for inclusion in the 2030 planning period. Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.6 2050 CIP Growth Projects To develop the 2050 scenario, the system changes proposed for 2030 were used as the base. To serve the new development areas happening between 2030 to 2050, LAN proposes new growth CIPs listed in Table 44 and shown in Appendix 25. Similar to 2030 growth CIPs, the alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment, and final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 were used to size the new facilities. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 64 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary In addition, Schertz Pkwy, Cover’s Cove, and Park lift stations are set to go offline by 2050 per City staff. Therefore, Cover’s Cove and Park lift stations were set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass that lift station. Schertz Pkwy lift station will also go offline, and its flow will be conveyed to a new CCMA line which will be built by 2050. However, due to the unavailability of information about the new CCMA’s line, the Schertz Pkwy lift station was set inactive in the model and its flow was directed to a new outfall. 4.3.2.7 Model Results Under 2050 Flows After bringing in the 2050 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2050 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 26. Similar to 2030 scenario results, 97% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5, and only 3% of gravity lines have a maximum (d/D) of greater than 0.5. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2050 wet weather flow was used to determine areas that are susceptible to overflowing. The modeling results show no manholes are overflowing indicating the 2050 system has sufficient capacity per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37. Therefore, LAN does not recommend any capacity-related CIPs for the 2050 planning period. 4.3.2.8 2050 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN determined that Cypress Point lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 1,250 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Table 45 describes 2050 system improvement projects shown in Appendix 27. Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 65 4.3.2.9 Pumping Capacity Evaluation For pumping capacity evaluation, the existing firm capacity (i.e., capacity with the largest pump off) will be compared to peak wet weather flow at each lift station. Per TCEQ requirements, peak wet weather flow should not exceed firm capacity. Table 46 shows the results of the pumping capacity evaluation. Note that this analysis has only been conducted for public existing lift stations; private lift stations have been excluded from the study. Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation As seen in Table 46, except for Cypress Point and Northcliffe lift stations, all other existing lift stations have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since their peak flows are less than lift station firm capacities. Per TCEQ requirement, Northcliffe lift station requires an upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 4,485 gpm, and Cypress Point lift 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 66 station needs an upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 1,233 gpm. Northcliffe lift station upgrade should be done as early as 2030, but Cypress Point’s upgrade can wait until 2050. 4.3.2.10 Force Main Capacity Evaluation As listed in Table 37, the hydraulic criterion for force mains is not to exceed a maximum velocity of 8 ft/s under the peak wet weather flow (average dry plus 5-year, 24-hour storm flow). Higher than 8 ft/s velocities correspond to high head loss in force mains which over time scour force main interior causing premature structural failure. Table 47 shows the results of the force main capacity evaluation. Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation All existing force mains have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since they have velocities below the maximum criterion (8 ft/s). 4.3.3 Summary The recommendations outlined in this section were a joint effort with City personnel and LAN to identify improvements needed for the City’s sewer system. These improvements aim to address capacity limitations and accommodate the anticipated growth in the planning years of 2030 and 2050. The sewer collection system model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 67 5. CIP Cost Data 5.1 Cost Data The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) provides a cost estimate classification system that includes five classes of estimates. Each class has specific characteristics that indicate the level of detail of the cost estimate, with 5 being the least defined and 1 being the most defined. These classes are commonly used industry standards for engineers, contractors, and estimators. The accuracy range of an estimate narrows (becomes more accurate) as the project scope becomes more defined as shown in Figure 29 from AACE below. In the same figure, the approximate overlap of classes is shown as well in relation to the level of scope definition. Figure 29: AACE Cost Estimate Clases For this analysis, Class 4 estimating was identified as the appropriate, industry standard, estimation class. According to AACE, Class 4 estimates “are prepared for a number of purposes, such as but not limited to, detailed strategic planning, business development, project screening at more developed stages, alternative scheme analysis, confirmation of economic and/or technical feasibility and preliminary budget approval or approval to proceed to next stage”. The developed cost estimates are preliminary and rely on available information and standard preliminary engineering methods for Class 4 cost estimation. These methods were consistently applied to similar project components (e.g., pipelines, pump stations, lift stations, etc.) to facilitate comparison between different project alternatives. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 68 Cost data for the proposed CIP projects was obtained from the following sources: · TxDOT Online Bid Reports (past year) · RS Means Database · Cost Estimates from Past & Current City Projects · Cost Estimates from Past & Current LAN Projects Item costs were averaged from these sources and an inflation rate was applied to the costs for 2030 and 2050, which is discussed in detail in the following section. A 30% contingency factor was applied across all cost estimates, which reflects the range of accuracy of a Class 4 estimate. For cost components that were highly variable and unpredictable at this stage of analysis, such as developing construction documents and construction management, estimates were derived from previous project experience and included as a percentage of the total construction costs. 5.2 Inflation Rate Calculation In order to accurately capture construction prices for the future scenarios, an average yearly inflation rate was calculated and applied to the 2030 & 2050 project cost estimates. Three sources were consulted for historical inflation indexes including RS Means, Mortenson Construction Cost Indexes, and Turner Building Cost Indexes. Varying time frames of inflation were provided by these sources, but the data was not normalized to ensure that a wide range of indexes were included in the yearly inflation rate calculation. Additionally, these indexes are the average of nationwide data. Table 48 below shows the varying time frames and their associated total and yearly inflation rates. The median yearly inflation rate of this data is 3.91%, and this value was applied to the line items in the 2030 and 2050 cost estimates. See Appendix 28 for inflation rate source data. Table 48: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate RS Means Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2024 128% 6.31% 2010 to 2024 169% 3.81% 2000 to 2024 251% 3.91% 1990 to 2024 309% 3.38% 1980 to 2024 454% 3.50% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 132% 9.65% 2010 to 2023 188% 5.93% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 117% 5.27% 2010 to 2023 172% 4.25% 2000 to 2023 231% 3.70% 1996 to 2024 272% 3.77% Average: 4.86% Median: 3.91% 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 69 5.3 CIP Projects Estimates of Probable Cost From the data discussed in the previous two sections, individual cost estimates were created for each CIP project and can be found in Appendix 29. Table 49: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects NT-W1** Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 NT-W7** Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 NT-W8** FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 NT-W9** Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 NT-W10** Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $23,206,556 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 70 Table 50: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Table 51: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $68,177,000 System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $4,775,000 2050 TOTAL: $72,952,000 Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 2030-W4** Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 2030-W5** Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 2030 Growth Subtotal: $69,503,000 System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 2030-W10** River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $2,738,000 2030 TOTAL: $72,241,000 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 71 Table 52: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Near Term CIP Growth Projects NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24" $10,425,000 NT-S4** Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 NT-S5** Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 Near Term Growth Subtotal: $45,760,800 System Improvement Projects NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $1,763,000 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $47,523,800 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Original 2009 master plan cost was $9,000,000 and the 2024 construction cost was $13,000,000 resulting in a difference of $3,400,000. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 72 Table 53: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8" $1,338,000 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8" $1,663,000 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8" $475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10" $2,525,000 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10" $1,038,000 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8" $3,113,000 2030-S12 FM 1518 8" $400,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8" $2,963,000 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8" $1,275,000 2030 Growth Subtotal: $29,342,000 System Improvement Projects 2030 SI-1** Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 2030 SI-2** Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 2030 SI-3** Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 2030 SI-4** Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 2030 SI-5** Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 2030 SI-6** Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $24,527,000 2030 TOTAL: $53,869,000 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 73 Table 54: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-S1 I-35 N 8" $9,088,000 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8" $6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8" $2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8" $1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $28,865,000 System Improvement Projects 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $5,602,000 2050 TOTAL: $34,467,000 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 74 6. LIST OF APPENDICES SECTION 2 Appendix 1 – 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Appendix 2 – Zoning Map Appendix 3 - 30-Year Population Distribution Projections Appendix 4 - 30-Year Housing Distribution Projections Appendix 5 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 6 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 7 - Planned & Existing Commercial Development Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 8 - Planned & Existing Commercial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 9 - Wastewater CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use Appendix 10 - Water CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use SECTION 3 Appendix 11 – Near Term Water CIP Map Appendix 12 – 2030 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 13 – 2030 Water CIP Map Appendix 14 – 2050 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 15 – 2050 Water CIP Map SECTION 4 Appendix 16 – Flow Meter, Meter Basin, & Rain Gauge Location Map Appendix 17 – Dry Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 18 – Wet Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 19 – Existing System Evaluation Results, Surcharge, & SSO Location Maps Appendix 20 – Near Term Wastewater Growth & System Improvement Projects Appendix 21 – 2030 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 22 – Max Depth to Diameter with 2030 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 23 – Sanitary Sewer Overflows with 2030 Wet Weather Flows Appendix 24 – 2030 Wastewater System Improvement Projects 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan & CIP City of Schertz, Texas 75 Appendix 25 – 2050 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 26 – Max Depth to Diameter With 2050 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 27 – 2050 Wastewater System Improvement Projects SECTION 5 Appendix 28 – Inflation Rate Calculation Sources Appendix 29 – CIP Projects Cost Estimates Appendix 30 – CIP Projects Utilization Calculations APPENDIX 1 - 2018 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN !"#$53 Æÿ9003 Æÿ4061 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ87 Æÿ2522 Æÿ284 Æÿ8151 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ4061 Æÿ8151 Æÿ9003 Æÿ87 !"#$53 BEXARCOUNTY GUADAL U P E C O U N T Y COMAL C O U N T Y BEXARCOUNTY GUADALUPECOUNTY COMALCOUNTY SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHERTZ C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCH E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHE R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHERT Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZCITYLIMIT SC H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJBOU N D A R Y SCHERTZ C I T Y L I M I T CIBOLOSELMA CONVERSE GARDEN RIDGE UNIVERSALCITY SAN ANTONIO LIVE OAK ST. HEDWIG NEW BRAUNFELS SANTACLARA SAN ANTONIO APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ I APZ I APZ I APZ I Clear Zo n e Clear Zo n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Zo n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Zo n e SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJ BOUNDARY CiboloCreek KINGS LAND SHINOAKDR TOE P P E R W E I N R D GR A N I T E S H O A L S BEAV E R CR K PARKBENDDR BORGFE L D R D S C H A E F E R R D S T O L T E R D H S T W FOREST BLF COUNTR Y L N W O O D GL E N W E I L R D R A N D O L P H BR O O K S P K W Y SPRINGTO W N K R U E G E R CANYON EAV I ATIONBLVD JSTW ELMTRAILDR OAKMONT BEN D SEMIN O LE PA SS C S T W NO R T H B L V D SUNRISECANYO N DR S C H E R T Z P K W Y LO W ER SE G UIN R D GOLFVISTABLVD UNIV E R S A L D R BR E H M L N FO U R T H S T E FIFTH S T W BO U L D E R V W EC K H A R D T R D S O U T H E A S T R D SCHOENTHALRD V E R D E P K W Y DAIS Y W A Y THIR D D R E KING S W O O D S T EN G E L R D FO U R T H S T W CIBOLO VALLEY DR THIR D D R W CHERRYHURST EAST PARK S T A R L I G H T L N NOR T H W E S T R D NO R T H PA R K C S T E NOR T H E A S T R D HANOVER PL ACE F S T W MOONLITRIDGEDR NORTHWESTDR EL M L E A F LN C O U N T RY MILL S O U T H W E S T R D GLENBRIARDR M A R I O N R D M ARIGOLDTRACE HAE C K E R V I L L E R D S CENTER ST N A B B OT T R D FO XBROOK W AY DUS T Y F I E L D S CO U N T R Y C L U B B L V D MAS K E R D LANG D O N D R PARR CL E G G S T SOUTHERNWAY CH E R R Y W O O D L N R E D B U D W A Y MISTYRIDGEDR BR I S C O R D HO L L O W R D G W E I C H O L D R D PVTST ATIH 35N GLENTR L S C H O O L S T RIDG E LINE R D E EV A N S R D OLY MPIAPKWY LOOKOUT R D FO R U M PK W Y SHADY BRO OK E LANGL E Y B L V D ZUEHL RD SC H W AB R D CIBOLO T R L NORTHEASTDR DANA DR LOW E R V A L L E Y L N AL M O N D BEND N S OL MS R D W E N Z E L L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D HUNTERHTS S C H M O E K E L R D GIN R D LOST TREE M A RIC OPA PATH STRATEM A N L N GR E E N V A L L E Y R D SENECACRK 3 R D AV E W R U E C K L E R D NEW B ST W W A L Z E M R D BR E T O N PAS S LIECK CV TR A I N E R H A L E R D C YRU S MC C O R MICK S E I D E L S T KITTY H A W K R D W S C H U L Z S T W A RE-SEGUIN R D TU TTLEST S P R I N G T R E E H O L W Q U A R T E T T L N LIV E O A K R D LOV E L N MEL W O O D PL A C E LANDMAR K FALL S MONTG O M ERYDR S P O K E CIR PIONEERPOINT DR JIMMY W A L K E R PAT BOOKER R D R O S E S P U R P A R K NANDINACT BU F F A L O C R O S S I N G AV E N U E A CANOPYB E ND IH 35 N A C CESS R D PEACEFULDR HOLLY LN S H A L L O W CR O S S I N G AUTH O RIT Y LN OAS I S S T H O P E LN EL I W H I T N E Y WAG O NCROSSING S AGE OAK FORESTRIDGEPKWY TR E L L I S W A L K O BERNAIPATH MIR A M A R B L V D CIR C L E D R BL U E S P R U C E D R MOR N I N G S I D E D R WILDWINDPARK VISTAVW MEANDERIN G TRL JAY B R O O K D R HIG H CREEKRD GOL F TEE LO S T F O R E S T D R MY S T I C TO P A Z HITC H R D IDLE W O O D F RIENDLY AC R E S EMMETPARK RUBY RITZ STA C K ST ONE BR I G H T L E A F D R TOMKITE CT TEX A S DR BALBOADR OAKBUD VISTADR MINNIES T BARRELSTAGE AUS T I N D R IV YPOS T SPORT AVIATION DR JUSTIC E L N HAR V E S T B E N D BRONZEROCK DR FO R U M R D PEACOC K L N R O U N D CR K HIKER S HOL W B EAVERELM KAY L E E C H A S E 2NDAVEW SH AD Y PARK LN OLIV I A RAY C O R BETT D R NORRISDRW BIND S EIL G ROVE V E N T U R A B L V D CL O V E R L E A F D R SOMBRAHILL BEGONIA N E W B ST E TR A C E CR K 8TH S T BR O O K V W DE A N R D MISTY Q UAIL MAY F A I R HALFHOCK S T I L L B R O O K LN FAIR L A W N A V E LO N E S H A D O W T R L OLDAUSTINRD 3R D A VE E WENSL E DALE D R SECRETSHORES CHE S T NUT D R S T A D L E R C V SAHARA WOODS R I D G E PILOT M U LE DE E R WILD RID G E T R L W I L L O W HIL L PELICANPLACE S O U T H S T HUNTER S GLEN BOBBYJO NES D R WHISTLER N L I V E OA K S T OLDEMOSS 1ST S T THISTLECREEK D R CO T T O N K I N G S P O K E HOLW OAK CIR TO W N CR E E K W A Y CRESTWAYRD BU LL CREE K DR TIM B E R S P G S WOODVIEW DR SUNRIS EPASS GR E E N M E A D O W S CHAMPIONS P A S S BUTTONBALL DR BEAROAK HINGEGATE MAR I L Y N D R RUSTYSPUR COLT TRAIL MOR G A N R U N VAL LEY OAK DR W O O D B R I D G E W A Y GLENPT PRIVILEG E P T LARAMIEHILL R H O D E S BL A C K S T O N E C V HILLVIE W LN Q U A I L D R W I L L O W BR O O K FF S T BR A H M A W A Y R Y E R D LONG C O V E D R COPPERW O O D S TW I N C R E E K F A R M DAV E N P O R T CAC T U S F L O W E R RUDDYDUCK FAR R I N LN N SAN TA CLA RA R D HEIGHTS VALLEY W I L L O W W A R B L E R UTICA W AY C O U NTR Y VA LE OSPREYLN POR T C H E S T E R LIB R A L N PANOLA PASS CORDOBA DR BAL LINGER CAP R I L N VISTAPKW Y PHEAS A N T PEN I C K W A Y B S T W AST W W H I S P E R CANY O N A S T E LO N E C R E S T L N B S T E HAR M O N D R AL A B A S T E R R O O STER R U N LAZY F O R E S T D R TUMBLE W EE D RU N S A D D L E H O R N W A Y Q U E E N S L A N D W A Y LIN D A LEE LN STIRRU P DR EN C H A N T E D V W TR I A N G L E R A N C H CUR T I S S A V E FR E D C O U P L E S HAR V E S T SSOLMS RD TIMMER M A N C V INDIG O B RUSH DR T ULS A TR L BR I A R K N O L L MOUNT LATMOS UNIVERSALCITYBLVD PEN C I L C H O L L A S P R I N G BR O O K ANTRIU M NATIONAL BLV D COPPER M I S T D A RTMO UTH C V OAKMEADOWS S A G E N I T E B R O O K H O LLOW D R C O RRAL FENCE S I L V E R OA K C O RD ER O DR CATTL E BEN D F S T E CO P P E R D A W N S W A T E R L N LIN D A CT WOODL AND OAKS D R EL L E R S T O N B L V D MIL L E R R D W I G E O N W A Y S A D D L E V I L L A S U N S T E M S H A R O N CT FORSYTHPARK W I T T E N ROLLINGBROOKLN R O A N CIR NUPECANGROVE S U N BL O O M S P R I N G CIR S Y C A M O R E D R AUTUMNLED G E CENT U R Y FA R M DR S U N S H I N E FAL L S Z O ELLE RWAY L O N G LEA F PK W Y D S T E COV E HILL LONGING T R L CH A P S S T AMAL F I PAR K V A L L E Y F O R G E D R V E N T U R E W A Y W S A N ANTONIO S T RIVA RID G E CIR HA W K C I R V I L L A E L M MOR N I N G R O S E SUNFLOW ER DR MACON AV E BR I D L E BE N D AGORA PKW Y V A L E R I A D R ESTE RYEMOONCV PINEHAV E N DE V O N W O O D S T EAS T ST W AS HLEY PAR K LAUR A N PAR K D R S M O K E BR E W LA C E L E A F L N FOREST RAIN W H I T E EL M V I L L A G E O A K D R R A TTLESNAKE WAY MOR N I N G D R TR E E CR O W N BR I A R L N WHITAK E R HIGHLANDVISTA QUIETV W 7 T H S T KEY W E S T W A Y THIR D S T W O RTH AV E MOUNTAIN BR O O K GOLDENBEARDR W A T E R O A K FIR E C R E E K DR CR E T I A N IS L E G O LDEN O A K TIGUEX S U N D E W CIR W E L L B R O O K COCO MEADOW FORTYUMA LAUR A B L F FAL L E N S T O N E GAR D N E R C V TUL I P S T DAY L A N H T S S U N N Y B EN D CR E E K S I D E HILL W H I T E TR L MCBR I D E BR I D G E BRO A DLEAF MELISSA CT F ORE ST CO R N E R BR O O K S H A D O W OAKTR E E C I R CL Y D E S D A L E R U N BOWIE CV COPPERFALL S PIS C E S C RYSTAL VALLE Y DR DEER CREEKBLVD CANTER B U R Y L N PA R K F A I R GAT E SAVE R N E WA Y JU DITH A N N DR CUTLER BR I D G E CY P R E S S PT SAN PAT RICIOBLVD HING E F A L L S COPPER W A Y OA K P L A C E PINTALEPT TR A V I S D R BAY H I L L D R TITAN PARADISEPASS DANEPAR K DOUGL A S S T DO C OL E N A GINKO CIR UL L R I C H R D S P R I N G T R E E BEND R O Y C E R A N C H R D AS T E R R U N PVTRD AT JESS ES CIR SPRINGTREE CV BECKER S T W I L D MEAD O W COLIN A WAY COV E CR E S T HOPESHOLW MIS T F L O W E R D R BOOKERBAY H ORSESHOE TR L SANDHILLC R A N E D O RAL CT MAGN OLIA M A N O R SWILLO W W AY HIDDENGR O V E BL A I N CIRBL A C K PINE COR U M TR A I L D R CO P P E R NES T S SANTA CL A RA RD NOR RISDR E CAN Y O N V I S T A CIT A D E L PEAK WHISPER VW IVORY O AK DR MIS T Y HO L L O W D R KA RIB A C V SILV E R T O N D R FIR E B I R D R U N SPOTTED O WL SCARLETFIREDR KR U T H PT MES Q UITE C HASE GAILCIR V I S T A D E NUBES ADALIN E WAY BENINGV A L L E Y TAU R U S CADDINGTONDR R E D TIP D R EL D R I D G E D R MANOR S I D E BL A C K B R I E R DR BOG I E W A Y BRENDAFRANCES S P A R T A N TER R A C E IBISAVE CHAPE L H I L L C R US AD E R B EN D C RY S T AL P L AIN S O U T H W E S T E R N AV E VALENCIALN CONCHO CR K COPPERSKY BERRY DR PAL O M I N O C V BITTE R W O O D D R CHUR C H OAK GR O O M S R D W I L D C H E R R Y WALNUTSPGS S U N S E T C V SCENICCRK R E D R I P P L E AR A B I A N C R K FR I T Z W A Y PAR K L A N D S W A Y HIGHLAND G R AS S TIDELN OAK CT SCENICDR W I L D C A T R U N CO Y O T E H I L L THE B E S ZUEHL CED A R CT IR I S H C R E E K R D TO W N C R E E K R D FIR D A L E FIR E STONE P K W Y PR E S T W I C K W A Y IRIS RUN CIRCLE O A K D R FO R E S T O A K WHITE PINE DR ME N L O RAILLN PINTAIL W A Y CRESTED HTS PR A I R I E L N FLINT R D AS H W O O D R D W O O DLA WN F AR MS PRAIRIE OAK COPPERR I S E SARATOGA PLACE BR I A R MEADOW CY P R E S S CT GARDEN CIR CHUOKE FALL I N G O A K DST G ARDENARBOR PHEBE BLACKSTONE SLUMBERLN DONSHIREDR COR O N A D O B L V D M C C O Y W O ODS W O T T O S T CAS P I A N BAY D R S H E R V I N W A Y A S T P VT ST AT T HE FORU M OAKVALLE Y GNAR L E D OAK W I L L O W CV MEADOW L A N D BR E E Z Y C V FOR E S T R I D G E D R MAR E PAS S WALNUT BASIN MIM O SA C T R I O BL A N C O MY S T I C W A Y GR A S S L A N D DR AZ U L S K Y CT W L A N G L E Y B L V D GLEN HTS BIN D S EIL C RE EK BR O W N O A K BINDS E I L L N AZALEA G ATE JACQ U E L I N E S T F O REST S Q MANDERLYPLACE S T A L L I O N C V AL B A R E L L A SIERRASPGS PEC A N CT UTOPIA BLVD MER I O N W A Y CAND Y D R HAGENW A Y AR N I E LN FO R E ST B R E EZE MES Q UITEPASS PAR K L E A F LAR K S P U R V W TRAILHOLW SCHMIDTAVE S A G E S T E M STONEYCREEKDR KR I E R C V BE EBL V D LOM AVISTAST MATTHEW S T LIS A M E A D O W S DE E R M E S A FO REST BRAN C H NIR A GOL F MIS T JOSHUATREE FR E E S T O N E OLD NACO GDOCHES RD T OPPLINGLN CL O U D C R O S S I N G R E D H A W K BE NTW O O D R ANCHDR CARRICKCT AGARITA CIR TR E M O N T S T GA T E W O O D CL I F F LEAFYHOLW S T O N E Y P T W H I T E B R U S H CENTERBROOK LOCH L O M O N D D R AM B E R L Y C T VILLAGEPARK PLU M R A N CH R D PEB B L E R U N BL U E B I R D HAV E N BY P A S S T R A I L S S A N D V E R B E N A AR R O W R I D G E STANLEY PARK S L E E P Y MEAD O W BALBOA PARK DAHLIA S T O N E B R O O K DROGELTH O R PE CIR CR E S T O A K D R H O C KLEY HILL VESOUL VALLEY PECAN S T ANG O R A T R L S P R I N G T R E E GA T E Q U I V I R A D R BARBARABEND LACALA KEY L A R G O B L V D R O M A AFTONCANYON CIVIL CR OSSIN G PR I C K L Y P E A R D R LOOKOUTV W P E N SIVE D R B UFFLEHEADDR W A G O N W H E E L W A Y SONATACT E LEGION DR BIG HO RN T R L TIMB E R C R E E K DR CHER O K E E P A T H WHITEROCK ARABIA NKING GATEWOOD BAY N WILLO W W A Y BOR D E N OAK CRICKET PLACE PILLORYPOINTE JEANETTE DR ARB O R PARKLN S A F A R I D R DAY S T A R PO R T ER N I E W A Y GR E E N S T O N E CJ J O N E S C V HIC KO R Y HO LW M O NU M E NT PASS M ESA VE RDE S A D D L E T R L W E I R R D BR I A R S T JONAS D R CONGRESSIONAL BLVD PAR K V I E W D R FOR T U N E HILL G OTHIC DR GLE N NOO K D R DEL A W A R E PAR K S A D D L E CR K BRISTOL OAK OA K R U N CINNABAR C T F AIRFA X D R W EBST E R DR HINGE CHAS E BY R O N DR MEADOW V I E W D R BERRYWAY PECOS P T S P R I N G MEADOW L N SEC R ETARIATDR KIMBERLYDR COPPER C R E E K TAV E R N TR A I L D R S U N S E T H T S CAPEMEADOWDR CRA NB R O OK LIBER T Y S O U N D R I M D A L E OLDANI DR S A S S M A N R D D O VE RUN BENTL E I G H DR DE VACA DR BL U E V I S T A W I N D M I L L FALD OCV W B Y R D B L V D HO L L E R I N G V I N E GARDENNORTH DR JU PITER HAVEN HAY S P A R C R D CAS C A D E DR FETLOCK DONOVANPARK H O M E S T E AD PKWY ROARINGSPG R U I D O S O CHAS E OAKDR TWINBRANCH B R AES W OOD LN ST VINCENT W A Y DONALAN DR CHUR C H S T S A D D L E P A S S S P RIN G W O O D SQ CRYSTAL CANYON W A Y N E DR BATTERYPARK PEAL E DR SADDLE SPOKE NUHNW A Y HA R V E S T H I L L B L V D T R O PH Y CLU B LIBERTY HO RSE S H A D O W M T D R LANDMAR K HAV E N NORTHALLERTO N BR U N N I N G CT PLANELN C OLO NE L RD G GREENSHIRE D R MIDWELL CR E P E MY R T L E L N FAL L O N CT ALSATIAN W AY W W R I G H T B L V D W I E D E R S T E I N R D AESOPLN PAR K H T S POINT VIEW DR FER N MEADOWDR HOL L O W GLE N KINGBIR D PL A C E SHADOW MOSSCT DE L TA DR W H I S P E R TR A C E KIL D A R E DE LAGAR Z A STU RD Y O A K DR JANIC E D R M O S S W O O D C O GHILL RO SLIN F O R EST SICILY ISLE PAL I S A D E S D R BE NHOGANCT M ARO O N ST MIL L S T FLIC K A HILLS CIBOLOHTS HILL T O P A V E AR R O Y O LOMA REDSKYCRK F S T ELOOP1604NACCESSRD W I N G E D E L M HARVEST CANYON EL K GLAD E R A N C H O HIDALG O MEAD O W S O N G BURROBEND S H A D O W Y C K PL U M A S DO E R R L N FAL C O N PA R K N LA VERNIA ST CHUCK W A G O N C T ANDERSONB LF HAL L I E H T S MUS E S PE A L E CT ZOELL E R CV N BAR N E T T S T LES L I E H T S S A V A N N A H D R MICHELLE TR ANCE L N WIED ERSTEIN ST SOMERVELL BACKNINE R A I N LILY L N DR A Y T O N U N N A M E D ST AT R A N D O LPH A F B BR I T E R D SUM MIT HILLDR CL E A R W A T E R B L V D LAURALLN W I L D C O Y O T E T R L EAGLEEY E PE C A N PT CABALL O C A N Y O N E S C H U L Z S T BELM ONT RD G S MOKEY P OINTE GATE BR I D G E H OYALN FELICIA FO X G L O V E PAS S E KR U E G E R S T KOV E LN BODECIR IV O R Y C R E S T D R HILTO N DR C R O W N OAK W E L L D R E N CA NTOVISTADR TRAILDUST LN S W E E T G U M L N SOUTHCREEK PV T S TAT A G O R A PKWY GLE N FOX TUR N I N G S T O N E MEADOW B U R S T MUL BE R RY DR DOBIE B L VD NEW R O C K CR K MEA D O W S C A P E AUTUMN AR B O R RED W OO D CIR S UNRIDGE D R M A RIE M E A D O W TERRA COTTA POQ U I T O CIR FO R E S T FARM TUMB LEBROOK MEADOW F O R G E PA R K G L E N PRIM R O S E WA Y JAR R A T T MIS T Y W O O D LN WILMINGTONWAY STOR MY BR O O K EM E L I A S T GLE N EAG L E S D R W ATS ON W AY H O O T O WL SCENIC LIN KS ARCHES VALLEY SHARP HILL SECRET HOLW E HUEBINGER S T AARONLN S W E E T L E A F LN PATS Y D R S H A D Y CV TR AILSIDE LN EM E R A L D BL F SA RAT OG A K N OLL G AMBLE W O OD MEAD O W BRANCH M A RIGO LD WAY N ORT H L E D GE DR TONNEDRE A N DE RSONWAY W I E D N E R R D EASY MEADOW DR KER R Y B R O O K D R MUN S T E R DR S T A B L E HO L W MUSTANGCV FE RRELL RD W I L L O W PATH W H U E B I N G E R S T IVO RY CR K SPLIT O A K C ROOKED OAK GATEW O O D TR A C E W H I S P E R BR A N C H E KLEINS T AUDREYRDG ISLAN DHOLLOW S A D D L E R U N F RIE S ENHAH N L N ANDR E W LOW R I F L E R O C K TEAKWOOD TREE S U M M E R HAV E N L N BUFFAL O T R L VIRTU OS O PA SS FIEL D S W A Y VALLEYPARKDR CO E R S B L V D BEACONGLEN COPPER R O S E W E S T C H E S T E R D R C H ESTNUT BLUFFDR LORING PARK ABER C O R N HINGE PATH GU S T Y P T GR A N A D A D R WIND MILL WAY BL A C K HO R S E R I C H A R D S O N DR STALLIO N RAN C H FIS H E R R D APPLE SPGS FO R E S T C R O WN OA K S T BALLE Y PT TALLOAK DIM R O C K L O N E S T A R W A Y IVY MOUNTAIN PL U M CIR FRONTIER R D G CHES T N U T BEAR W K R U E G E R S T HER I T A G E V W ROANOKE D R R OUNDUP W AY R A N C H HOUS E R D C YLA M EN BL O O M BEND MOS S Y L N WAVIATIO N B LVD WINGED F OO T NOR W O O D C T S P R I N G F A W N S C O T T S BL F GO O D N I G H T C I R W H I T T M E N AV E ROUNDHAYPA RK REDBUDCIR IV A N D R NO R T H S T BL A C K B U T T E F O R E ST SU M MIT CH R Y S A N T H E M U M COPPER HOLW CAP S T O N E HIGHV I S T A MEADOWSPGS W H I S P E R M A N O R AM A R Y L L I S HAW T HO R NE PAS S LOUELL A D R S H E T L A N D P A S S SELESTAT PT G ATEW OOD FALLS COP PE R BLUFF SUNVIE W VALLEY BY P A S S CANY O N ANDRE LAS S O LN GRAPEVINEDR FUR L O N G GATE MA D I S O N C R K NIEMIET Z C V HA R N E S S L N PINTO P L A C E JAS P E R H I L L L N THO M A S W O L F E W HIS P ER RDG LIV I N G S T O N D R BL A Z E M O O N TEN EVA CV W I L L O W TR E E S P A R R O W W A Y TA N G E R TE R R A C E S U N D E W M I S T PL A N T E R S P A S S RETAMA CRO W N COPPER S A N D S FIS H E R S PATH TAR I N PT W I L L O W R U N KENS I N G E R P A S S PAINT E D R I V E R VAL LEY PAS S EV E N I N G LAUR E L GAMB E L S Q U A I L GR A N D V I S T A COLT C R O S SING CATTL E R U N R O D E O WAY LANTANA S P G PARADISERD WAHL L N T R AIL BROOK CR E E K R U N LOOKOV E R B A Y MINER A L S P GS BIS O N L N BELMONTPKWY ANV I L P L A C E S H A D O W W O O D L N SILVER WING IH 10 W A C C E S S R D W H I S P E R G L E N BETT Y J O E LN BR O N C O BEN D PEACEAVE TOMAHAWK CIR CL O V E R B R O O K L N GOEBEL M E T ZV A L L E Y PIONEER HILLS BEL L E G L A D E B L V D AN G E L S DR W LINDBER G H B L V D FAL L I N G S U N JU L I A N P T SPYGLASSCV CO P P E R H U R S T L O D E S T O N E S O A P S T O N E COPPERS P G IDAMAR I E BERRY C R EEK D R MAPL E D R DOVEWING MEDICINER O C K HIGH T R A I L R D BANDANA ST FAIR T O N PL A C E PA S A T I E M P O BA R E B A C K BE N D KIP P E R AV E BL A C K H I L L S C T SLEEPY VILLA G E TW I N L N WATERFALLPASS SLEEPYLN OAK CR EE K DR BADLAN D BEACON W I L L O W BL F EAS Y O A K CR K G A R D E NIA BENDDR VINE LEAF DAKOTA CR K BL U E W I L L O W SEAHEADRIGDR CR I N U M LILY D R CR O S S B R A N C H DR HANOV E R CV PUL I T Z E R R D BILTMOR E MANOR AMISTADBLVD PINS E E K E R CR Y S T A L V W LAURELCRK R U S T I C A C R E S S U N S ET R D G W O O D S I D E W A Y LAR G OZA AVE H OURLE S S O A K S ANNDR CHELS E A D R R A N D O L P H A V E CR O W N CT R U S H CA N Y O N N MAIN S T S E R I CV RO SE RALLY W AY MY R T L E T R L S U N S E T D R HOOS I E R PAR K FIR CIR KEY S O U T H W A Y PIONEEROAK TOP R I D G E L N W I L L O W V W A S HLE Y MEADO W OZUNA DR WINTERFROST L A N D M A R K BEN D MERRYWOOD KEY N O R T H W A Y CLINTON RD R AINBO W GLAD E ROANST BR I G A D I E R P A S S LINC O LN DR THIS T L E DER B Y R U N PURO O R O DR LOS T M A P L E S W A Y TAMAR O N HINGECR K WILLOWDR Q UIET PIN E DE R B Y VIS TA LONESO ME VALLEY VIGN ETTE COL E CR E E K D R CONV E R S E B U S I N E S S L N REMILLY WAY POSEIDON S T O R M M T R D G AM BLEST SUNSHIN E TRAILDR APACHE FOR E S T R O S E B U D V I S T A GR A S S Y T R L COR U M R I D G E D R S A D D L E N E S T CY P R E S S W I L L O W CANTER B U R Y H I L L R U G G E D O A K S D R W E D G E W O O D D R GLE N S I D E MAY F L O W E R A PA C H E L E D G E FOGGY MOONDR AU R O R A S K Y TO W E R B L F FOR E S T W A Y C HIMNEY TRL S A R R E B O U R G S T KITTY HAWK R U N S M O K I N G O A K S AUTUMN PLACE MCALIS T E R LN CHERRYHILLSCT K N E UPPER R D E BY R D B L V D GOL F TR E E V E R B E N A G A P WHOOPING CRANE W HITESANDS SIR BA R TO N B A Y W ALT W HITM AN WAY LAURA KATHY IV Y M A N O R LONES T A R GAIT TURKEY TREE CO Y O T E C R K AUTUMN ACR E S O A K PARK MEADOWASHDR S A R D I N A DIV E R S E Y D R TIRREMA GR A N V I L L E PEA K WOODLAKETRL HIDD E N ME S A S U N S E T T R L SLEEP Y RIV E R FER N W O O D DR EL E G A N T E W A Y MA N D O L I N O L N NIG H T HA W K BO E I N G CO R N E R BILL HASS S T E P H A N I E G E E IR O N K E T T L E SILV E R BUCK L E LANCER H I L L AR T E S I A W E L L S MOUNTAIN OAK C AP O T COURTLN CHESTNUT BLUE STONEFIELD HIGH PL AINS W A L N U T C R E S T W I N D W I L L O W GAT E W O O D M I S T I S T E DEP O S I T I O N GA P W I L L O W W O O D S T R A S B O U R G W A Y PECAN GROVEDR PIONEER T R L S U N R I S E R U N D R NOBL E W A Y DO L E N T E R D MAL L A R D COR N E R BL A C K H A W K S K Y MEDIATOR R U N MC C U L L O C H GL E N N FAZIO D R KR I E R CR O S S BY P A S S S H O A L S W I L L I A M S S T ERLINGVW W R I G H T C V ATHENIAN S T O N E Y B R O O K DR LA N D M A R K R U N CAMER O N R I V E R APPELL A T E W A Y F O REST P O N D CIMARRONCV BR O O K H I L L S U N R I V E R D R NOR T H E R N S T A R G W E N D O L Y N W A Y MESCALTRL NOR T H A V E N DR COLLIN G W OOD W I L L R O G E R S D R TYLIN D S T R O M PADOV A FR I A R R O C K W A Y AN D E R S O N CV PFEIL S T W E E P I N G W I L L O W W E E P I N G O A K D R GILA BEND DIS C OVERY W AY SNOWMEADOWDR BR O O K R U N ALTON BLV D W I L L O W CL I F F COPPEREL M D R TUR K I S H OAK N ELLD EANE BLVD V O I R DIR E W H I T E H O R N D R O RIE NTAL TRL GULFSHOREBLVD S U N S E T F L I G H T KR I E R L E D G E W I N K L E R T R L DES E R T R O S E W O L F F R U N S T R E A M C R O S S I N G CO L B U R N W A Y S A D D L E S P U R TR I P L E C R O W N SILE NT C O U N T RY SKY H A RB O R FORESTER B E N D HIDDEN CAV E BOV I S CT AUBUR N P A R K PEC A N BR A N C H COV E T R L R I D G E GAR D E N D R NAUMANNW A Y C H E STNUTASHDR HAZELTINE W A Y G R A NITEMIST BUCK M O UNTAIN V I C K I L Y N N EA GLE VALL EY ST DISC OVERY MILL THR A S H E R TR L IR O N R I D G E PAS S GA L W A Y FALCON R I D G E D R R I M R O C K TR L ROCKHILLVW GA V E L PAS S C HESTN UT O AK S I L V E R S P G S A W G R A S S B R OOKHEA D LN FOR B A C H D R M AYBERRY MILL HE M I N G W A Y T R L KEN S I N G T O N D R S P R I N G T R E E CIR BLAKELY ST R E D B A R N R U N TR A C T O R P A S S W A Y S I D E T R L MES Q U I T E CIR LIN D B E R G H A V E PER I D O T MANDEV I L L A S U NSET VIS TA DEW FALL TRL OSAG EAVE S A D D L E C V MEDIATORPAS S S TAMPEDE RANCH AR C A D I A P L A C E MIM O S A D R HAW K S M E A D O W S UNNA MED S T AT N ATIO N AL BLVD DEER F I E L D B L V D RID G E BL F S E M I N O L E D R DALEWOODDR MUIR F I E L D W A Y PIEDMONT PL A C E AR C H E R S CO A C H H A R TLE Y S Q INKS W O O D MOHAWK DR NO E L F O R E S T WO ODC LIFF BLV D BL U E M O O N S P U R CHERYLMEADOW COPPERES T A T E AL D E R S GATE OAKF O R EST D R HARVES T PT G R A Y S O N CL I F F BRANCH HOLLOWDR NAV A J O C I R COPPER O A K KLO N DIKE CV GIV E R N Y C T EA G L E FLI G H T HO U S T O N D R C A R N O U STY DR R E D S T O N E M A N O R R I D G E FIR E LAS E R R A TUR F CL U B CH E R O K E E HILL TUSCA N HILLSDR W E E P I N G W A Y BO W I E D R DY E S S CO R N E R COWB O Y TRLOWL CREEKRD S I O U X L N DELMONTEDR H O N EY G R OVE CR O C K E T T A R ROYOVERDE R O B E R T S T E V E N S PEAS E P A R K HIGH LAND PLA C E EV E N I N G BR E E Z E ZUNI B E E CAVE S CV CR E E K S I D E D R PIPE GATE DUSTY C RO SSIN G WAYWORDTRL DEADWOO D R DG CAS C A D E S CV KELLYAVE TR U D Y L N DEAN CHASE CO R T I J O LAHM AV E HEA T H F I E L D CA R L O W 5TH S T W SA N D Y O AKS SHEILA POND GATEW A Y D R R E G E N C Y RUN AR I E S MAGICFALLS MARIETTALN AL P I N O CR E N S H A W CT GR E E N M O U N T A I N D R COPP E R MOO N PER I C L E S D R LO G S W O O D WENRICH COMMON L A W DOV E R GLADE SUSSEXCV PINENEED L E S L N HA R P E R R U N GR A N B E R R Y P A S S GOL D E N V I S T A D AVENPO RT WAY CAV A N BR A C K E N D R SMOKEY PLATTE S NIPSTAR W BORGFELD RD TORCHW OO D D R J S T E W R I G H T A V E ME A D O W W I N D MIL L R I D G E R D W E R N E R S T AR A B I A N CV W S C H L A T H E R S T FUL T O N DR MULHOUSEDR RO TH A U DR ROSEWELLPL ACE IV Y L E A F AV E N U E E BEEAL L E Y TR E V I N O DR W I N N A V E CHER I S S E D R CH A M P I O N O A K GUILF ORD FO R G E BL A K E V I L L E W E S T O A K RAINFALL RDG M ESA PAR KHER M E S D R S T R E S A TOL L E R D CL E A R MEADOW ME A D O W LN BIR K D A L E DR OAK TE R R A C E DR BENCH T R L VALLEY HILLL N RAIN E Y M EAD O WLN PER U G I A D O G W O O D LN BOR E A S W EL L S PA R K S U R R E Y L N IVYPOND W E D G E DR R A I N B O W FALL S HERCULES S I L V E R R I V E R W I N B U R N A V E CL E A R W E L L WILLIA M SCAR BROUGH B O B W HITEDR MEADOW H E A D D R WIND S W EP T C V OLD CIBOLO VALLEY DR RAWE AVE NOR T H E R N HEIGHTS D R ARROW VISTA LALU N A S T A T E BLV D FORE S T NOO K CT MIL L C R O S S L N LA R K S P U R CR E S T W I N D S O R CT RIVERRD CINDERACOVEDR S U N R I S E FAL L S DEWBERRY PARK T E A G U E LN R O S E S H A R O N D R WEST F O R K D R CAPR I C O R N S A W M I L L L N S T O R M R D G STATIO N S T MIL L E R S TR L M A P L E W A Y OVALMEADOW ME A D O W D R BL U E S A G E LN DALY C V GAT E W O O D BR I A R PVTSTAT PATBOOKERRD FIRST ST COPPERG L EN MEAD O W HOR N D R JE R SEY BE N D ATALAYA BIG JOH N LN ROBERT DERRIC K COR K S U M M I T V W W I L L O W POIN T E 2ND S T AR I S T O T L E 4TH S T E BR O U G H T O N SHER WIN DR SUNPOOL BERRY PARK CL OUDSPT 5TH S T E S C A R L E T C R K S A N D P I P E R D R R A M B L A S 6TH S T E V E R D E HILL S MCCAR REN PARK DE S O T O D R ARDENNESLOOP S O P H I E MAR I E BAR R W A Y OLD C ONVER S E RD 1S T S T E 3R D S T E TUR NAB O U T L O O P S A L A D O SADDLE RDG GEORGIAMAE S A S S I E LN MAPLE RIDGEDR IVY CURL HATCHMER E CT RUSTI C WILLO W RHE WPLACE PECAN FALL M O R N I N G D E W N HA C K B E R R Y S T KIN G SLAND CIR WATER WOODDR LUCKY OAKS THIR D S T O L Y MPICDR THUR B E R D R N BEY E R S T CO T S W O L D PEA R L C H A S E P E NINSU LA D R BL U E L A K E R D G AR C A D I A D R MEADOW G A T E KE A N NA PLA C E B A R CELONA PIN G W A Y S T R I C K L A N D R D BR I D G E C R O S S I N G Q UIET CREEK D R FOR U M ACCES S N CU N N I N G H A M S T CHLO ECT PASSE RINA SPUR EL M A V E S C U N N I N G H A M S T CYPRESSMISTDR VISTA PLACE SMOOTHWINE BRESSANIWAY FR O N T I E R CV NO R T H V I E W CIR PATR I C K H E N R Y DIETZ R D D ERBYDAN LAKOTA C T S LA VERNIA ST HID D E N GR O VELN BEA C O N A V E EL F OW L N CE N T E R S T FO U R T H S T INVERNESS W AY CO L O N Y GATHER I N G P A S S THE S S A L Y N PAR K EAS T RADFORDTRL S P A R K W E S T S H A C K B E R R Y S T MOUNTAINSHADOWS FAL C O N BAY OLMSTEAD PARK CAS T L E CT EX C H A N G E A V E CALVERTST S BAR N E T T S T WELLSFARGO S PAR K E A S T JUSTINOTRL KLINECIR AR B O R DAW N L N KETTLE CV FOR E S T R A N C H CORRIDORLOOPRD SUMTERGLADE AL A M O PKW Y WILDWOOD WAY HIRAM LN FIR E S T O N E DR S E R V I C E R D CIR C L E S T A R R D HILLOCKS C V CHESTNUTCLAYLN NATALIEWAY LASCIM A S D R PALMETTOPARK AR I Z P E R D CA RDINALDR PL A I N S M A N R O B I N W A Y CROCKETTCV ARMOURDR EA G L E D R R O B I N OA K S CLO UDY BR O O K L U B B O C K L N H A U S M A N WAY G ATE WAY P L A C E GOLFBALL GIB B S-S P R A W L R D BAPTIST HEALTH DR R I O MIS T D R NICHOL A S C V EMER SON PASS W H I T E W I N G JUNIPERLN WILDHOLW CA S TLE CLIMB S H O R T S T R K L N DEEPHAVEN DR MO U R NIN G DO VE FIR E S A G E DY K E S L N OA K N O R T H DR KIN Z ELCT TR E E TOP L N JA S O N S W A Y ER I C A LA M A R S T AV E N U E B TIER R A G R A N D E FLAGL E R B L V D PHANTOM CR K M O U N T C REST DR PIL O TPT DEEP SP RIN G PAS S LINDY H I L L S CHALKSTEM TH O M AS EDIS O N D R W I S T F U L T R L FO X G L O V E L N FAV E R O C V MA N D E L A N E DR PAR K LA N E C T STEVESAVE T R AIL VILLA G E D R S C O T C H R O S E L N S P R I N G T R E E FIEL D S P A R K L E P T B E NT W O O D P ASS W U ES T S T GLENCR O S S PITTS L N FIR S T S T W BL U E B E L L D R CAN D Y L N FOR E S T B R I A R JORDA N AER O A V E U N D ER WOODCT GREY FEATH ER LING L N PONY C ORRAL S A R A Z E N CT WINE GARDEN CREEKWOO D ST BETTYROBERTS APPELL A T E R I S E COV E R E D BR I D G E WINDINGBLOOM APPALOOSA PASS MID-CITIES PK W Y BRUSH TRAILBEND COV E B R OOK HAYCRAFTBLVD CAMARON WOODS LUD L O W TR L BALTUST R O L DR CHALK HILL CV TAMBUR O T R L KO E H L E R RD DRO W SEY AVE LINCOLNWO OD D R S I P P E L A V E W U R Z B A C H S T FALL I N G R I D G E D R MER I D I A N RO S EWOOD C V BOCA RATONDR REDRIVERBAY MITCHELL AV E TIR E S T E S MAIN ST H O LLIW ELL BRIDGE TESORO PERDIDO BO W S P RIT PIER CODY L N SKYCV HOR S E H O L W GOY A DAKOTA R UN W H I S P E R CV COPP E R CL I F F HA M I L T O N PL A C E RHONDADR SA N TA CLA R A ST TURTLEBACK D S T W BOLD CY P R E S S FOUR O A K S L N NAR R O W P A S S D R WHISPER K N OLL FISHERMAN PO RT SEC RETCV C OPPERKNOLL CEDAR BR I D G E HOR N E D LAR K HO R S E S H O E CV C H E STNUT CT BU R N I N G TR L EM ERALDPT G OLD EN MEAD OW S I L V E R T R E E BLV D CHU RUBUSCO D R HIGHLAND V W PARKMEADOW W I N D Y FAL K TATT N A L L CARDINALPT H O W ARD DR LEGEND R O C K W E T Z R D BR O O K OR C H A R D LIV E O A K CR O S S I N G PO RTROYALST LONGACR E CIR R U S CV R A I N Y B R O O K AS C E N D I N G PO R T S U N G L A D E R A N C H GALLANT RIDGEDR R O S E M A N BR I D G E ROUNDTREE D R EL M CT PE C A N HE R E F O R D S T DEERH O L W DUNCAN PL A C E MATH O M DR SHADOWTRL LITTLEOAKS S TA M S CIR S O R E N S T A M W A Y UNION C R E E K DR KITE CO R N E R FAR M V I E W S H O R T W E Y E L R D F R ESNO PLAC E AR M A D I L L O W A Y EBO N Y L N HERA D R G ARZA PLA C E B AY WILLOW T RAIL ST E M M E A D O W CR E E K D R KO C H INT E R M E Z Z O W A Y RANDOLPH AFB OL E A N D E R DR LAURELLN JUDS ONW OOD CO N C HO WAY DR ARCHE R S GR OVE BR O O K S AV E MES Q UITECR K ECHOTR L BANNO C KS DR Y E L L O W B A R K B L V D EAR H A R T LN W H I T E F I E L D EDITH FOREST CABIN STABLEVW FORESTELF C H E R RY BLO SSO M D R COY L N AU T U M N V W WOODLAKE PT GLENHAVENDR LEDFOR D LN HIGHLANDLAKE DR W A L D R D T A R R A N T T R L BA L A N C E D R O C K TIMBERTAP T RINIT Y T R L NEW A BACAL L W A Y M ES A BR O O K R I D G E C A N Y O N D R WIN D Y BROOK CA M P F I R E W A Y WE MBLEY CV INVERR A R YDR CHURCHILL AVE TR O T T E R T I M R A N C H CR K R A W H I D E W A Y LOST M E ADOWSDR CANOGA MEADOW DAK O TA BAY MIR A F L O R E S CA LLA W AY PARK WILL CLOUDESLEY IKE L N BR O O K W A Y RISINGSTAR M AR KET T R AIL S T A L L I O N PAS S CONNELL POND BRIDGE M O N T PLAC E BU N K E R S T OS A G E CIR CO L T S B A Y 3R D S T W SPIRALWOODS HAVENMEADOWDR AB BEVILLEDR GLEN L A R K W A R A D M I R A L MAPLE TREERD MEA D E S T LAZ Y DIA MOND PAT R O N VIL LAG E W O O D E D TR L LA U R A H T S W O O D DUC K 4TH S T W BR O K E N AR R O W BL A C K W A L N U T BRINWOOD E W R I G H T B L V D DAIS Y D R GLENCR O F T OAKMONT DOW N S E LINDBER G H B L V D HINGEIR O N BINZ-ENGLEMA N R D GR A N I T E FIEL D TR A N Q U I L V W PUMPKINR D G KR I E R V W R U N N I N G HOLW PR I C H A R D PL A C E GLEN LAKE ROCKYSHOALS CLAY RIDGEDR CL E A R R I D G E D R HOL L O W OAK OAKW OODLN S U M A C C I R VALONA DR OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D M O O NLIGHT C T SHALLOWBANK BL O S S O M CT IV Y J E T RID GE PEAK D R BUS I N E S S CIR S O R R E L L L N LIBE R T Y V W BUS I N E S S CT BAR R E N R I D G E D R S H A D O W C R E S T DR PAL O M I N O CANY O N BR E M E R S T R AN G E R OAK DA NIE L D R FOREST BRIDGE HER O N FLATS CES S N A L N MAIN S T T R O UT RID G E D R FO REST BO W OAK DALE GATE CR E E K L N LO C K WOODL N E S E G U I N S T IV Y F I E L D ROBINCV GY P S Y C V JAS M I N E D R FALLEN PINE WOLFPRAIRIE MT LAUREL FOR E S T D A W N CIN NABAR TRL GAV E L G A T E ME D I A T O R P A T H HARTCREST PLACE AVERY RD MIDA S PAR K V A L L E Y D R N E W COMBE DR TEN AC A TR L R I D G E NOR T H D R DO U B L E DIAM O N D JULEP CHAS E BEL G R A V E W A Y FOR E S T A S H CR E E K V I E W OAKS HADLE Y RUN G UADA CO M A DR SPRINGTREECLIFF GAT E W O O D OA K S DOUGLASFIR DR FOREST CROSSING JONQUILL EAS T E R N FINCH FLINTR O C K W A Y NORCRESTDR HOLLE RING PASS B LACK O AKDR G S T W WILLO WS RAN C H BARNSWALLOW KIS E R L N BERE A N WAY CH A S E F I E L D DR NOR T H C U T T R E S A C A G S T E M A D R O N E DR HAR P E R V A L L E Y D R CO P P E R R O C K CREEKRD GO O S E N W A Y WIN DY RID G E TRL OAK R USH QUEBECDR AS H L E Y S W A Y W I L D CR E S T PR A I R I E BEND SH A DY MEADO W S LN COPPE R S TREA M ALA M O D E R BY BR O OK MEADO W BRAMBLE W O O D CIR W L E G I O N D R ME A D O W OR E PIGEONBER R Y S O U T H L A N D AV E FR I E N D S W O O D PATH WIN D Y PT RUSSWOOD CIR ABBOTSBU R Y SONNYRDG LIG U R I A D R POPLA R AV E LUNDYSLN AV E N U E D DOV E H I L L C HER O KE E WIN DS LAS ALLE PL A CE S U G A R C R E E KST IL I A D PECAN HTS S U NSET SUM MIT OAK R D G ME A D O W S A G E CE N I Z O S P G CANHAMRANCH GOL D E N W A Y HANS O N S FOR E S T KER R Y IVYJEAN P O R TOFINO PLACE WESTCREEK D E E R MEA D O W HULLST LILACHILL GO L D E N O A K T R L GLEN CAS T L E HEY N I S S O U T H S P R I N G T R E E S H A D O W CY N T H I A AV E N U E F D O MINGUEZ LN S U N D E W L N OVER LO OK DR HICKORY LN GAR D E N SH O OT DIS C OVERY RIS E GARDEN RID G E D R GLENAR B O R DE STIN Y ACRES RIP P LE WA Y PAINT E D TR A C K S B E LG R A VIAFO R E ST HALF MOO NDR GUY GUISBOR NE PENNY PKWY LONGHOR N W A Y GOLDEN R O D CV BLOSSO M BLF JO D Y H TS MEADOWDAWNDR NORMAN CV HAPPY T RL CABALL O R U N SLEEPYTRL AV E N U E G OS A G E T R L DA P P L E DR SP LITRO CKLN CALABRIA MAYFAIRDR MEADOWFAWNDR LEE C O R ALTRL R U I D O S O R A L L Y OA KKN O B W I L L O W C R K BLOSSOM CRK W HIS P E R P T CO P P E R C V ALTGELT L N CIPR I A N I W A Y DOUBLEROCK MATS O N MANO R TH O R N T O N L N W I L L O W O A K CHLO E D R R E D CEDAR C V LINDEN GR O V E D R VAN NES T CIR SOCRATESLN NA F T A C I R CR I M S O N COV E D R AR R O Y O S I E R R A DEN N I S J U P E D R TR EELIN E A CRES VERANO D R GRAND FOREST DR S E C O N D D R E GLOX I N I A D R FLA GST O N E D R CO N C H O PAS S AR R O Y O DE L S O L S T E E R L N MAR E W A Y BERRY KNOLLDR VIVIANDR WOLFRUN TUR N E R R D G MAIDMARIAN GLENBR O O K AR R O Y O DO R A D O INDIAN BL F GLE N P O S T ELV I R A A V E KR UEGER R DG S U N D E W CR K BERRY TRACE OLD TOEPPER W E I N R D GR E E N T R E E DR RIDGE FLOWER CHURCHILL CV CA B A L L O V A L L E Y LIG H T H O US E DR AEGE A NW A Y FISHPOND RD LUNEVILLELN ANGUSW A Y B ATTLE LAKE WIST O RIA C T W RIG H T L A NDING CORSICA D R COPPE R ST O NE EASTERN CLOUDS OBBLIGATO LN ARROYOSECO MT LA U R ELLN S ENIO R CIR SHININGGLOW W SEGUINST D O RISDR AV I A T I O N A V E KR A M E R P K W Y N ACOGDOCHES L OOP BERRYPATCH GLADY S AV E S A D D L E CANY O N MYRTLE RUN PR E S T O N T R L R U N N I N G BR O O K INDIANHILLS C HESTNUTGATEDR SKYL I NE RIDGEDR HARVE S T R D G PR I M R O S E MYSTERY R D G MISTYFIELDDR DO W M A N S T D EER CANYON D R HEASLEY PLACE BILTMORELAKES TAR LACDR LANDMAR K GATE W W E T Z S T CR E S T B L F BO W I E S KN O L L R I D G E BEACH DR W K L E I N S T ECH O RIDGE D R FEATHE RLN O W L W O O D S V I C T O R I A N CIR CO L E T T E L N 1S T S T W AUGUS T A GLADE ELKTRL TAG LN CUB D R BU B BLIN G SPRIN G S R D CED A R B R U S H R D SA H M P ASS DEER R U N AS T E R C I R DUSTY EMERALD REDOAKCV REBELGROVEDR KINGS M A N S T BIR C H S T SP RIN G T REE TRL AZAL E A C I R AUTUMNFALL BR O O K S H I R E LIBER T Y R D DR E A M A V E MEADOWGR E E N CO T T O N S P I N D L E PINE MEAD O W D R SUMACCV M OSSRID GE LARMONACV VONDELPARK C ALLEYCIR HAR R I S O N OAKS COR R I D O R OAKS GR A N I T E W O O D S RU NA W A Y CRO W N H OLLY FO RES T TR O T T I C V BL U E M O O N GAIT COR R I D O R P K W Y MU S K O G E E BEN D LE M O N W O O D A V E SCOUT P T MIS SIO N HILLS DR FL O R E N C E GR O V E BE E C H W O O D A V E H EY NIS N ORTH S C O T T A V E BL U F F S I D E B L V D MARATHON PASEO C OR TO D R DEA RBO R N DR POIN T E LO O P WOOD L A N D C V FO X L N APAC HECIR IV Y D O V E OL D E N G E L R D NATUR E P AT H HILL L N GOL D E N R O D L N C AN DLEBE R RY D R CHESTNUTMANORDR P RIVATE DR S A F E H A R B O R ALTAMIRANO IVYHORN STE E P V A LL E Y EC H O L N MISTYARBOR DEL L L N FAIR L N Y O R K L N EDENGR O V E D R S C H U E T Z D R S P Y G L A S S TIAR A D R AL B R E C H T L N CEDA RWINDSDR MCHENRY DR IVYFLOWER W I L L O W L O O P 6TH S T W AYALAL N LY R I C L N ME E K S T CORONARDG DOW N I N G S T TURTLE DOVEDR POR T A G E L N OR C H A R D GL E N AS H L N W I L L O W W I S P R D GL E N N L N F U RLONG TIGERMEADOW BETH A N Y DR D A GAMA D R WINDVIEWWAY BLUE GOOSE CE D A R L N CHENEY R D PO P L A R G R O V E L N ROVEENTRL GLENHILL SPRINGTRE E G ROVE TRONAMINE I S T W LAKE HIGHLANDS OL I V E A V E V I S T A D E L R E Y SUNS HINE TOWE R D R LUCILL E PVTRDAT 9275WEICHOLDRD Y O U N G A V E IV Y J A D E KISSENAPARK FIFTH S T PRIZEDPONY BALDWIN PARK BRINSONCT R H O D I U S L N MA R T I N E Z PAS S ADR I ATIC FOREST PATH BORMANNDR MOUNTAINHOME CRISTOBAL D R BIR C H B E N D GR O V E PL A C E SEASCAPELN UPPER S E G U I N R D MEA D O W S T O N E R A L E I G H D R A N D ERSONCT MEA D O W PEAK CHR I S T I A N S TEE MAS O N C R K ME A D O W DAL E WINDWAY CRK DE R B Y R A L L Y RO UND ROCK W AY COPPER ME ADOW PARK LANE DR BEXARBOWLING IH 10 W R A M P L AZYACRESLN LA W R E N C E L N G O LDEN R O D CIR S T A N U S H R D MEA D O W W A Y EL B E L R D SPRIN G TREE LN HOGAR T E N PAR K EL MONTEBLVD BET H PA G ECT FAIRVIEWDR DAN C I N G AV A S Z 0 2 S E R V I C E R D SEN N A HILLS DR CINNAMON TEAL SHERRIDR S C O T S E L M R O Y A L D R TU RNBERRY DR FOXRUN TR A N Q U I L L O W A Y S C O R D A T O DR CONCER T O DR NO R T H M E A D O W CO P P E R S I D E K N OLLW O O D GLEN CV VILLADR BLAZING STAR TRL SPANISHOAKDR CEL T I C AS H R U N CL Y D E S D A L E S T W S C H A E F E R R D COMANCHETR L CL A P B O A R D R U N W I N T E R R D G Q U A R T E R M A R E GREN A D A G AIT ERSTEIN VALLEY AP P ALO OSA R U N FALL E N TR A I L D R CY L B U R N PAR K D R SHADOWCREEKLN B E NT B R O O KDR W A R R I O R TR L VALENCIA R O YAL H O R S E BAR K E R CY P R E S S MEA D O W H I L L S TARCIR TUR Q U O I S E MU N T J A C S T S E C O N D S T W W E S T E R N TR A I L D R SOUTHERN RIDGE DR MONIC A S CRK S E C O N D D R W BOW R I N G PAR K SILVER ROSE FIR S T D R E FIR S T D R W SECLUDED DR FAUL K N E R D R S E C O N D S T E THIR D S T E C O O L SANDSDR S H A D O W LAW N C I R C HELSEAPLAC E PVT R D AT F M 482 REDMANPASS BRANDYWINE CV PESA C V BLACK B UCK ENCHANTED OAKS NOTCH LEAF AUDUBON PAR K S A D D L E H I L L H ENRY F O R D DR PETE R S O N L N S T A N D I N G OAKS NATUR E T R L GLENBORO APAC H E R D G TATE L N H A M P T ON HILL S S T E R L I N G W A Y UNIONSHOALS SCARLET TANGER S E L M A P K W Y LE GISLATIONDR BUR K W O O D L N S U R N ADPLA CE HUN T E R O A K S AND O RRA DR BRANDIN GTRL SPRINGTRE E RUN S H E R L O C K L N RID G E P O R T D R COLUMBIARIDGEDR BA Y M E A D O W SST T WIN P OINT C R K GLENHAR T SNO WY EGRET IR A D R GREE NGRANT BR A N N O N L N CELESMEADOW W ILDTRACE W H I S P E R O A K WOMANHOLLERINGRD MUS T A N G MEADOW ELM DR OAKBREEZE ABIGAIL ALCAN FOR S U N F L O W E R S T INDIAN BLANKETST GLEN MANOR WILLO W B R A N CH COPPER TR A I L D R B OAT M A N PIER CONV E R S E CENTER BAS S F A R M R D BAUGH LN LA J O L L A TEAKW O O D D R K LEIN CIR S M O K E Y C R K M A NNINGTONPLACE R I C H M O N D PAR K AS S E M B L Y C I R TR U M B A L CALE DR TIF FAN Y LN W O L F F V I S T A SCHMIDT-C RAFT LN PACE R L N STRAIG HT LN MAR B E L L A CO M A N C H E R D G W E S T E R L Y P L A C E CR E E K S I D E D R GAR D E N MEADOW P VT R D AT 15497LO OKO UT RD CHESTNUTCEDARDR FALCON CR O S S I N G IO L A S W A Y HIDDENFAW N MEADOW S K Y MEADOW V W BR I A R F I E L D CR I M S O N TR E E CAST A N O CV CHESTNUT CAPEDR MINERALSWAY CR E S T W O O D DR MADR I D D R GR E E N BL U F F D R S U N R O S E L N S A D D L E V I S T A CAL L A L I L Y MISTY CV GUL F S T AUTUMN DAW N BR O K E N S P U R Y U C C A P A R K CAS T L E H I L L DR BRAES CORNER GALLANT F O X D R D O V ETRAILDR BU CKB O A R D LN S A N A U G U S T I N E BL V D MIS T Y A S H KING L N BARK W O OD KAY L A L N PAINTED R I D G E D R CR O S S P L A I N S SZ01 SE RVIC E RD R O C K Y T R L G R E Y S O T O L WAY W I L L O W CR E S T MEADOW R U E STO NEY BROOK DR S E C O N D S T Y E A G E R C I R PINECONECV CE D A R G A P CALE R A CV FR E A D L N SIERRAPA SS BOLER I O D R COPPER BROO K FL O R E S L U N A R D PL A Z A D R CAMPUSDR IR O L A D R CA B A N A D R LITTLE S U G A R C R K KEYWINDYWAY HUIS A C H E H I L L S T R OLLINGLN R O B I N D R BR I S B A N E R I V E R SUTH ERLUN LN LIMESTONE MILLDR DEL A I N E P A R K COPPERKETTLE EL M S T CAR M E L D R A PPAL O OSA OAK H O R SE B RID GE CLEARW OOD PATH HANGING MOS S D R R O C K COV E L N MUS T A N G V W IVY MISTY MASONVALLEY DE E R G A R D E N C V HAS TINGSPA R K LENOWAY KURR E WAY Q U A K E R R D G NE M E C L N CE D A R C A V E R N G ALLO PIN G OA K SPRING WILLO W NOMAD LN TO M M Y T R A I L DR R O X A N N E L N O M A R D R SHAY P A S S BULW A R K P E A K RIV ER BROOK DR V A L L E Y M E A D O W LEADINGOAKS HAR B O U R T O W N RACEWAY DO W N S W HISPER FIELD CACTUS P A T C H CANSIGLIO KEL I W A Y BR O O K B E N D R E N E E D R S H ADY OAKLN TU R F W A Y P A R K KILGOR E D R R H O D E D R FAR L E Y D R MAL D E N D R HEAV E NLY VW TOR O N T O D R INTER L A C H E N BU C K S K I N W A Y PIPE S T O N E PR A I R I E V I S T A R O S E G A T E D R BO R W I C K L N BEA U F O R T B L V D BR I S B A N E D R BL U E S K Y R D LA Z Y O A K D R BEL L I S T E R S T KUS M I E R Z R D C ST E LAIN E S S C HLAT HER P K W Y SWINDOW CIR S U T T E R S M I N E TARRANT H ILL PO S E Y P A S S PARTHENONPLACE THOR E A U T R L MC C O Y L N MEADOW T O P BR O W A R D A V E ELDORADO SUNLIT T R AILDR J O S H S W A Y PETUNIA AV E N GR A Y T O W N R D W HIS PE RIN G OAKS E G L I N GTO N W AY FLINTS T O N E L N P ATH FIN D E R GINS B E R G D R LIM ES T O N E MESA LEDGEBR O O K D R FAIR I N G T O N D R R U S T I C T R L LINCOL N V I L L A G E D R NUGGET CR K STEA R M AN L N W I L L O W TOP DR TUS A Y A N I S T C E N T E R FLO WERTRL W H I T E T A I L P A S S M C M O R RIS BLVD CAS C A D E R I D G E D R S C H R A N K O A K S R O N R D WISHING OAKS WAY ANTIQ U E O A K D R GAV E L D R EN C H A N T E D F A R M INDIAN M O U N D SEARIMDR TAP W O O D L N BR O O K S T O N E DAKOTA R I V E R RED H O R SE PARK BUCKHEADLN MUNICIPAL PKWY DU S T Y L N CIBOLODR NOTTIN GSHIRE COTTONTAIL LN S I L O S T FAW N P A S S S A D D L E B A C K T R L COTTON PATCH LAU R E L CAN Y ON DR FA W N D R S A M A NTHA D R ES K I M O F O R E S T KR I E W A L D L N ST A G H O R N MILL SAHARASTONEDR MEY E R S A V E O AKMARSH T R L R I D G E M O O N BOUL D E R D R ANTL E R D R S C H M U C K S R D SPRIN G T REEBLF ODY S S E Y D R M A X F L I D R GR EAVES LN IH35S RAMP HANA L N HIDDEN OAKTRL DIAMOND FAL L S RITABLANCAST PEACH L N DUKE W A Y DR CL E A R B R O O K A V E SHOWD O W N P ATH S N A K E W E E D D R ING L E W O O D D R FAW N R D G K E S T RE L OAK FO U N T A I N G A T E EA G L E S G L E N N R A L S T O N D R QUIETM OONDR REDIRON MICHELLEHILL HILL S I D E E S T A T E S FOR T W A Y N E BR U C K S D R MONTANIO DR W H I S P E R B L F AUTUMN V A L L E Y M A R GIE'SLN W H I S P E R H A V E N TR I T O N GR A N D K I D L N COUNTR Y V W CIBOLO TOL L E R D BL U E F O R E S T D R S C H N E I D E R D R GRIMCHESTER D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PAWTUCKET R DWINDINGTRL LEGACYOAKS P K WY AMBR O S I O L N JAMIE S U E D R BU FF ALO DR ER N A D R BR I D G I T D R DEBOR A H D R NEW B E R L I N R D GR E E N M E A D O W D R BEV E R L Y D R LOR I L Y N N D R FOSS M EADOW ZODIAC DR CH E Y E N N E B L F PECAN DR W I L L I A M S B U R G D R BOX E R P A S S D R CAVERN O A K R I C H M O N D D R GETTY S B U R G D R ANDREWS A VE R O S E W O O D D R CH E R O K E E R D G E OTTO S T S I O U X C I R CORALMEADOW M U S T A N G V A L L E Y JO N S W A Y HARVE ST CREST MIL L E R L N W ALNUT MILLDR R I F L E G A P R O S E L N R E D O A K T R L CEDARBRAN C H L O U A N N D R PIER S O N L N OA K L A N E D R BUL L D O G D R NORTHLAKEPASS PFEIL R D GAL I C I A AR A N D A L N S A G E D R COMMER C I A L P L A C E BECK S T TEAKW O O D L N S U M A C L N FAL C O N D R DW L N IH 35 N R A M P BR A C K E N C R E E K D R A U T U M N H O L W H A RVEST V W W UNLESLN CHAR L E S T O N S T A P P E R R D MICKESCH LN FAR M V I E W L N TATE S D R FOX B R I A R L N GLEAMIN G SPRINGS D R MARTINE Z-CONVERSE W I M B L E D O N D R CRES C E NT BE N D D R TEX A S V A L L E Y INDUS T R I A L D R W A R E - S E G U I N L O O P MO O N L I G H T M E A D O W S D R CEDAR C R EEKDR OAKS I D E BON A N Z A L N LAKEVIEWD R PVTRD ATSCHUETZDR CAFFEY R D CL E A R O A K AP G L N PVT RDATCOYOTERUN HIGH OAK BR I S B A N E W I N D Y M E A D O W S D R HILL B R O O K R D DAV I D L A C K B L V D CONCOR D I A L N DEBBIE DR DOR E E D R BEN E K E I T H W A Y HOMESTEAD DR CIN C H O NA T R L TONNEDRW OPIE LN DEN-OTT HILL B E LL NORTHDR TRIPLEL LN JETHR O L N E S C H A E F E R R D TAIL D R A G G E R L N EBER T R D HAECKER F I E L D S FR O B O E S E L N HU B E R T U S R D S C H N EIDERL N WILDH O RSE PAS S P VT S T AT ENGEL R D S K Y L O O P CATTLEMANSLN NO R - T E X D R S T O L T E A C R E S BEY E R P A T H GERDES RD S PERIMETER RD RETAMAPKWY OLDGRAYTO WN RD PV T W P E R I M E T E R R D WEST P ARK S O U TH PAR K BRIC KELL RD GATE W A Y B L V D FLATSTONE PASS FIFTH S T E WASHINGTONCIR KINGS W A Y R O B I N G A T E OL D C I M A R R O N T R L NORTHW E S T THRUWAY S C H U M A N N R D N EVANSRD OLDSPANISHTRL DOUGHBOYCIR CO L U M B I A ST A N D RE W S INNEROCTAGON PHOENIX A VE BOLTON R D C OCONUTPALM OUTEROCTAG O N PARK O FFICE AU TU M N R U N LN FOREST HOLW WIL D E R N E SS T R L MAIN CIR RYDE N D R O AK M O N T W A Y FM2252 TR I - C O U N T Y P K W Y C H ELSE A CIR PERSIM MON DR MORNINGGROVE G REYCLIFFDR COVERED WAG ON FE R R Y S A G E D R R U S C H LN FAIR W A Y S D R WELCOMEDR BRUSH CREEK DR VIC T O RIAPT BEECH TR L LONECYPR ESS AUTU M N FLOW E R TIVOLI G A R DENS AUTUM N BR O O K CHIC K A S A W B L F BENT TREE DR AZA L E A WA Y PEBBLEBEACH CHESTNUT BAR R GR E E N R I D G E SERENERIDGEDR LIEC K S T CO P P E R G A T E Y E L L O W W O O D DR MUS T A N G CANY O N S P I C E O A K L N TR E E BR A N C H CU R L I N G P O S T DOVE MEADO WS MO S S HO L L O W C T W O O D L A K E V W TEXASPALM DR TILDENTRL S H A W N E E B L F A M E RICAN FLAG COMANC H E P A S S FEATHERSTONEDR OAK BL O O M TIM BER ROSE D R R E D R O C K P A S S IRONMILLCRK G OLF R D BUCKIN G H A M VILLAGEST GR EE N W O O D MAIDENWAY DEERMEADOW BLVD AZTECWAY W I N D B U R N TR L S P R I N G T R E E P K W Y L O F T E D LE A F MOUNT OLYMPUS R H I N E L A N D D R PEPPER T R L CO M M U N I T Y D R BUC K S C I R FORRES T TRL TU R N B E RRY WAY EVERETT LOOP INDIAN CIR C O M AN C H E PATH LON G HO R N RID GE DR VISTA FAIRWAY BAT CA V E R D FIEL D B E N D G RASS H OLLO W DR HIDDENHILL S N AS H L E Y O A K D R ANTIETAMDR W HITN E Y W A Y BATCAVE LOOP CO R T E S DR ROBINH OOD WAY HING E L O O P CHE RRY T REE DR TR A N Q U I L L N STO R M KING S C E N I C V I S T A IH35S A C C ESS R D SPLINTERED O A K LU C K SIDE KRIERCT PE V E R O JA N E TLN BR A N C H I N G PEAK V A L L E Y O A K Q U E E N V I C T O R I A D R SH AD O W YDUSK CANARY MEADOWDR COPPER MESA BENTBRIDGEDR C H E R O K E EBLV D PINT O CR K CO P P E R L A K E MAPLE M E A D OWDR D OLLY DR R AF BU R N ETTE MACARTHURWAY MIS S I O N CR K G OLLST ANDERSON CHASE R EDIR O N C R K MIS T Y M E A D O W CANYO NOAK DIANA DR R I D G E M I L E OL D H A M CL I F F LAND MARK PARK CHERRYGLADE STERLINGMANOR MUSTANGRDG DIS C O V ERYDR MEADOWLARK PVTSTAT ARMYRESIDENCE SPRUCE RIDGE D R BELFORT PT FALCONMEADOW RIO VISTADR BAY T H O R N E COAST RIDGE D R OLDEVANS RD JA M E S AGEED R TRUMPETCIR COMANCHECIR PEACHTREELN DIX O N R I D G E D R GUNTHERG R O V E HABERSHAM S H AL L O W R D G PON D APPL E BRENDA DR LODGEP O L E LN S A N D H I L L D R W A G O N T R A I N ENCANTO P OIN T D R FIR S T S T E SHINING E L K CHIPPEW A B L V D S BEYERST KENTUCKY R D G SUNCLIFF D R R I D G E EL M DRY CANYONTRL FRANKSRD B E N T MEADOWDR GR O V E P A R K B S T HANOV E R S K Y BEL M E D E C T V A L H A L L A AS H DR W A Y W A R D P A S S DEMETE R LL O Y D S P A R K JANE ADDAMSDR CAR D I F F FAR M V I E W L O O P NLOOP 1604 EACCESS RD PFANNSTIELLN FM 3009 AC C E SS RD MATHO M LANDING DEDEKE DR IVY MO ON QUIET NIGHTLN SILVER FO X LEGEND POINTDR FARWEST DR V A G A B O N D L N VIJIL LO OP FR A N K B A U M D R M E D U S A UL Y S S E S W E S T O N R D R O T H B E R G E R W A Y TR O PHY OAKSDR REGAL OAKSD R GR E E N B R O O K PL A C E NOR T H V I E W DR MEADOW AR B O R CO V E R S C V STLOUISWAY S N O W G O O S E HICKORY BE N D TONKAWA PASS R A NDOLPH PLAZADR CO V ENTRY COVED R ABACCUS CT IH 10 E A C CE SS R D P O RTRUSH LN SEAWILLOW DR R O YAL T R OONDR K A U RIC LIFFS CL I F F S I D E D R R E B A C RAR Y MEAD O W TORREY PIN E S ZEPHYR CV AUTUMN WELLS BOENIGDR VASSOVW JE S SES CIR SELDON TRL WINDSOCKLN B R OOK LINE PARKVIEW DR HILL S I D E TW I N S A D D L E S ROCKR U N BIR C HW O O D CIR S A N DY RIDGE CIR BU FFALO PLA C E D RY W OOD RANCH MYRTLE GLADE R H E A S T SERVICEDRN O 1 W LA G U N AHILLS FR E U D E N B U R G R D BISMARCKLAKE S T O N E G A T E D R R I D G E MIS T D R MONTE SA C T ROBBINS GLADE SILV E R TE R RA CE NE W N I N G RU BENSDR HANSEL HTS UNIONTER R A C E GR E E N HER O N PUTTER COP P E R MO U N T A I N PVTRDAT 9305WEICHOLDRD ESTRIDTRL ABB E Y R D DAULTON RDG SERENEHILLS SWIFTLN M AIDSTONE CV CANTU R A M I L L S PEG ASUSDR VILLAGEGREEN GR E E N V A L L E Y L O O P FLATLANDTRL JO U R N E Y S W A Y C OY OTE R U N HA M P T O N PA R K CHE RRY HILL R V D R 1STA VE W KINGOAKS DR SPANISH OAK W E S T W A Y D R E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N GUADALUPE DR HILLV I E W D R FO X F OR D RUN D R CORINTH CO R P O R A T E D R FAIRVIE WCIR FLAMINGR I D G E D R NIKE CIR W A G O N W H E E L PA W L I N D R GAN D E R PAR K SH A DY CREEK L N MONMOUTH LEVESQUE LN ARCHER BLVD TRAPPERSRDG APA C H E B E N D DE W D R O P L N BR I S B A N E BEND O RO VIE JO CT MARGARITA HILL JANOE LN VIA POSADADR PINE V A L L E Y D R OCE A N M E A D O W DU S T Y R D G MARBAC H LN Q U A I L W O O D R U N COLDMOUNTAIN DAVIELN TW I S T E D O A K S A G R D S C E N I C H I L L L N BRUSH TRAILLN CREEK L OOP BL A C K S M I T H W A Y T R AILIN GOAKS BIE DIGERLN OUTLAWBEND PIG AL L E Y BLUEPT CIBOLO BEND VOGESPASS VIGILANTETRL S C E N I C L A K E D R PARKDR CATTLE C R E EK LN SA N TA CL ARA LO O P CAR R A N Z A L N BETHANY W A Y GARDENOAKS D R AR R O W O O D PLACE COMMUNITYCIR ME S Q U I T E W O O D S S T A L L I O N L N ULTRALIG HT RD RIOCIBOLO WAY HOL M A N R D STE P H ENS LN NPERIMETERRD EPERIM ETE R RD AUTUMN AR C H PAR K L N IV Y L N HIGHGATE R D W A G O N R D R EAL R O CK R D TALKENHOR N FORESTWATERSCIR LEWISRANCHRD PVT S T AT THE F O R U M IH 35N ACCESSRD PVTSTATTHE FORUM 0 ½1 1½2¼Miles BexarCounty GuadalupeCounty ComalCounty R ural Frontage S ector Boundary Air Installation Impact Air Installation Compatible Civic, S chools Main S treet Commercial Commercial Campus Highway Commercial Industrial Industry, Technology and R and D Parks, Open S pace Agricultural Conservation Estate Neighborhood S ingle Family R esidential Multi-Family R esidential Manufactured Housing Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Core TND/TOD Transition 1% Annual-Chance Flood Event ComprehensiveL and Use Plan S chertz Municipal Boundary S chertz ETJ Boundary County Boundaries R ailroads Major R oads Minor R oads Proposed R oads Air InstallationCompatible Use Zone APZ I APZ II Clear Zone“The City of S chertz provides this Geographic Information S y stem product "as is" without any express or impliedwarranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.In no event shall The City of S chertz be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connectionwith the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or ty pographical errors. Periodicalchanges may be made and information may be added to the information herein. The City of S chertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s)described herein at any time.” Last Update: February 20, 2018 City of S chertz, GIS Coordinator: Tony McFalls, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1184 APPENDIX 2 - ZONING MAP PVT F M 482 E P E RIM E T E R R D C R EE K R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM E TE R R D W E T Z R D W E S T O N R D G O L F R D G E R D E S R D ST O LT E R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P AT H E L B E L R D LOOP 539 E O PIE L N F M 7 8 N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR B UNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E T TE T RIPLE L LN H U B E R T U S R D S TA P P E R R D F R O B O E S E L N VOGES PASS FM 78 EAST OLD N A C O G D O CHES R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 2252 S C H W A B R D W EIR R D ABBEY RD D O E R R L N FA W N D R C A L E D R RETAMA PKWY MILL E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R L O O K O UT R D M A S K E R D SC H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A LLE Y R D PIP E S T O N E ARIZPE RD T O L L E R D B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D GIN R D K RIE W AL D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D S M AIN S T W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 7 8 WE F M 1 51 8 N MIDAS WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N A C CESS R D KIS E R L N FM 1516 N H A E C K E R VILLE R D W A L D R D F M 2 5 3 8 T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A N TA C L A R A R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D FF S T E EVANS RD W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D CIN N A B A R C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N F M 225 2 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D FM 482 FM 78 E FM 482 W EIL R D W EIL R D W EIL R D W E IR R D B U N K E R S T F M 22 52 F M 2 2 52 W EIL R D F M 300 9 F M 78 P F A N N S TIEL L N PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N FM 482 H A E C K E R VILL E R D S T O LT E R D W E TZ R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 3 0 09 SCHOENTHAL RD F M 2252 B O LT O N R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 482 E N G E L R D B O LT O N R D FM 2538 FM 78 PFEIL RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D ZUEHL RD E FM 1 51 8 N F M 3009 COYOTE RUN A RIZ P E R D FM 78 FM 22 5 2 IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 1103 W EIL R D W E TZ R D F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D F M 4 8 2 T O L L E R D F M 3009 M A RIO N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2538 IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 22 52 E F M 151 8 N IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 1103 E FM 1518 N FIFT H S T E FM 78 W FM 482 F M 4 8 2 FM 78 N ABBOTT RD IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D N A B B O T T R D FM 78 B U N K E R ST F M 3 009 F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 FM 482 HAECKERVILLE RD FM 482 F M 3009 F M 78 W LOW ER SE G UIN R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D D E A N R D F M 3009 FM 78 Legend Municipal_Boundary ETJ Schertz City Limit City_of_Schertz_Zoning_Districts Agricultural District Apartment/Multi-Family Residential Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) Garden Home (Zero Lot Line) General Business General Business II Main Street Mixed Use Manufactured Home Parks Manufactured Home Subdivision Manufacturing (Heavy) Manufacturing (Light) Neighborhood Services Office and Professional Planned Development Pre-Development Public Use Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential/Agricultural Two-Family Residential Major Thoroughfares Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220804_Schertz_Zoning_Districts.mxd City of Schertz Zoning Map .8/4/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 2 APPENDIX 3 - 30 YEAR POPULATION DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 4 82 IH 35 S E F M 1518 N F M 2252 F M 2538 IH 1 0 W F M 1103 L O W E R S E G UIN R D FM 10 4 4 GIN R D M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A LL E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 16 04 N PVT B O LT O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 F M 78 W B AT C A V E R D W A L D R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D MILL E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D KIT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W EIL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V ALL EY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L RIC H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A EFE R R D S C H W A B R D F M 465 M O R N IN G SID E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZP E R D E EVANS RD S T A P P E R R D WIE D E R S T EIN R D B EECH TR L T O L LE R D D E A N R D PF A N N S TIEL L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D ATH E NIA N WIE D N E R R D S C H M O E K EL R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D TOEPPER W EIN RD OLD N AC O G D O CHES R D FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N BIN D S EIL L N R K L N N EVANS RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M BI A M AIN S T W P E RIM E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O LD WIE D E R STEIN R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O DL A N D O A K S D R M ARBAC H LN G O LF R D PHOENIX AVE H A LLIE H T S O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N DE D E K E D R DIE TZ R D W ES T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D GIB B S -S P R A W L R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D FIFT H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T A LT O N B LV D KIS E R L N N E W B E R LIN R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M IC H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZAR PKW Y O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER L N SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N HIL L S D R T U R NIN G ST O N E H O L LY L N F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD RIP PLE W AY GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A IN CIR W E L C O M E D R NOR-TEX DR C IB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE AG R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S C HU L Z ST HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E W IL D H O R S E PA S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREE K DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING RI D G E L IN E R D TRIPLE L LN WILLOW DR BLAZIN G STA R T RL ABBEY RD CEN TE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N EID E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D COVE RS CV C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC WIL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG H LA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T ALLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R J OR DAN H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M EADO W DR E KLEI N S T B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR ROSE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S TIC E L N S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W AYSPRINGTREE B LF PIG A L LE Y E A G L E D R S T AT E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U NLES LN J O N S W AY 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R AY C O R B E TT D R MAYFAIR HING E L O OP E L M ST TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RAMP P RIC K L Y P E A R D R L O M A VISTA ST KEY WEST WAY U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR MEDUSA H O PE L N FM 78 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E TZ R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD IH 1 0 W IH 35 N I H 1 0 E W EIL R D W E TZ R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H AECKER VILLE RD N G R AYTO W N R D IH 35 N I H 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 25 38 F M 2252 I H 1 0 W F M 1103 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G UIN R D GIN R D F M 1 0 44 M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N VA L L E Y R D C R EE K R D E L O O P 1604 N IH 35 N ACCES S R D PVT B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 FM 78 W B AT C A V E R D MILL E R R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W EIL R D KITT Y H A W K R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O VALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U LL RIC H R D S C H A E F E R R D SCHWAB RD F M 465 C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A RIZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD S T A P P E R R D M O R N IN G SID E D R WIE D E R S T EIN R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D PFA N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D AT HENIAN WIE D N E R R D E EVANS RD SC H M O E K E L R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NAC O G DOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD BIN D S EIL L N C O L U M B IA TO EPPER W EIN R D BEECH TRL M AIN S T W PERIM E TE R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BISO N LN M ARBAC H L N DIET Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D DEDEKE DR FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K ST N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G OTHIC D R FF S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W MIC H E L S O N L N GI B B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A PLE D R LAZAR PKWY N E W B E R LIN R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R DEN RID G E D R S WATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N HIL L S D R TU R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A IN CIR N O R-TEX DR CIB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O YA L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S CR E EK LO O P R A F B U R N E TT E AG R D E S CH ULZ S T HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDA R CREEK DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING TRIPLE L LN SI E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R TRL ABBEY RD C E NTE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A TE D R S C H N EID E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV CA F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG H LA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T STA LLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E T T E L N D R A Y T O N JO R D A N H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y MEADO W D R E K L E IN ST B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR RO SE L N P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E FLIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N W AG ON CROSSING V E R A N O D R S A D D LE H O R N W A YSPRINGTREE B LF PIG A L L E Y E A G LE D R S T A T E B LV D BRACKEN DR W UNLES L N JO N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN B LAZE M O ON R A Y C O R B E TT D R M AYFAIR H IN G E LO O P E L M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RAMP S T A C K S T O N E P RIC K LY P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR WIN GE D FO O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W EIL R D IH 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W ETZ R D IH 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G SF O R D R D IH 1 0 W FM 78 WE FM 1518 N IH 35 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R A YTO W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C KERVILLE R D Legend ETJ Population 2020 0 - 300 301 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 7,000 7,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 13,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Population 2050 0 - 300 300 - 1000 1000 - 4000 4000 - 7000 7000 - 10000 10000 - 15000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Population Distribution Schertz 2050 Population Distribution .8/4/2022010,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\20220804_MXD_Files\20220804_Population Projections.mxd Attachment 3 Comal Comal Bexar Guadalupe Bexar Guadalupe APPENDIX 4 - 30 YEAR HOUSING DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 30 09 F M 4 82 IH 35 S E F M 1 518 N F M 2252 F M 2 53 8 IH 1 0 W F M 1103 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 1 0 4 4 GIN R D M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A LL E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1604 N PVT B O LT O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R TZ P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B AT C A V E R D W A L D R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D MILL E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D KIT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W EIL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V ALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H DR R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L RIC H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A EFE R R D S C H W A B R D F M 465 M O R N I N G S I D E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D E EVANS RD STA P P E R R D WIE D E R S TEIN R D B EEC H T RL T O LLE R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIEL L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D ATH E NIA N WIE D N E R R D S C H M O E K EL R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D TOEPPER W EIN RD OLD NAC O G D OCHES R D FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N BIN D S EIL L N R K LN N EVANS RD IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M B IA M AIN S T W P E RIM E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O L D W IE D E R ST EIN R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O DLA N D O A K S D R M ARBA C H LN G O LF R D PHOENIX AVE H A LLIE H T S O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N DED EK E D R DIET Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D GIB B S -S P R A W L R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D FIF T H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T A LT O N B L V D KIS E R L N N E W B E R LIN R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M IC H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZAR PKWY O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER L N SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N H IL L S D R T U R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD RIP PLE W AY GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M AI N C IR W E L C O M E D R N OR-TEX DR C IB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS ST O LT E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE A G R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S CH ULZ ST HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREEK DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HIL L L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN JO S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING RID G E LIN E R D TRIPLE L LN WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R T RL ABBEY RD C EN TE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N EID E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NEM EC LN R E A L R O C K R D COVE RS CV C AFF E Y RD R E D TIP D R R U STIC WILL O W LIBERTY RD HIG H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T A LLIO N L N O A K TE R R A C E D R JORDAN H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y MEADO W DR E K L EI N S T B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR ROSE L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S T IC E L N S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N VE R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W AYSPRINGTREE B L F PIG A LL E Y E A G L E D R S T AT E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U NLE S LN J O N S W AY 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R A Y C O R B E TT D R MAYFAIR HIN G E L OO P E L M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RAMP P RIC K LY P E A R D R L O M A VISTA ST KEY WEST WAY U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD FA W N R D G TU S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR MEDUSA H O P E L N FM 78 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E TZ R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD IH 1 0 W IH 35 N IH 1 0 E W EIL R D W E TZ R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H AECKERVILLE RD N G R AYT O W N R D IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 4 82 E F M 1518 N F M 25 38 F M 22 52 I H 1 0 W F M 1103 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G UIN R D GIN R D F M 1 0 44 M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L LE Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1604 N IH 35 N ACCES S R D PVT B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 FM 78 W B AT C AV E R D MILL E R R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W EIL R D KITT Y H A W K R D S S A N TA C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O V ALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST SAVA N N A H DR R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U LL RIC H R D S C H A E F E R R D SCHWAB RD F M 465 C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD ST A P P E R R D M O R N IN G SID E D R W IE D E R S T EIN R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D PF A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D AT HENIA N WIE D N E R R D E EVANS RD SC H M O E K E L R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NAC O GDOCH ES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD BIN D S EIL L N C O L U M B IA TO EPPER W EIN R D BEECH TRL M AIN S T W P E RIM ETE R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D W IE D E R ST EIN R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N LN M ARBA C H L N DIE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D DEDEKE DR FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K ST N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G OTHIC DR FF S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W MIC H E L S O N L N GIB B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A PLE D R LAZAR PKWY N E W B E R LIN R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R DEN RID G E D R S WATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN ST T U S C A N HIL L S D R TU R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K ET L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C IR N O R-TEX DR CIB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O YA L N G O L L S T O R T H AV E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S C R EEK LO O P R A F B U R N E TT E AG R D E SC HU L Z S T HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREEK DR COPPERGATE SC E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING TRIPLE L LN SI E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R TRL ABBEY RD C E NTE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A TE D R S C H N EID E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K VA L LE Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG HLA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T STA LLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E TT E L N D R A Y T O N JO R D A N H A E C K E R FIEL D S VE R D E P K W Y MEA D O W DR E KL E IN ST B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR RO SE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S TI C E L N SU M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G LE F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N WAGON CROSSING V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A Y S P RIN G T R E E B LF PIG A L L E Y E A G LE D R S T A T E B LV D BRACKEN DR W U NLES LN JO N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R A Y C O R B E TT D R M AYFAIR H IN G E L O O P EL M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RAMP S T A C K S T O N E P RIC KLY P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O PI A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S AY A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR WIN G E D F O O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W EIL R D IH 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W E TZ R D IH 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G SF O R D R D I H 1 0 W FM 78 WE FM 1518 N IH 35 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R AYTO W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C KERVILLE R D Legend ETJ Number of Households 2020 0 - 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Number of Households 2050 0- 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Residential Housing Distribution Schertz 2050 Residential Housing Distribution1/11/2022 .0 10,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\2021.08.19_TM Mxd. Files\20210831_Household Projections_Working.mxd Bexar Comal Guadelupe Bexar Comal Guadelupe APPENDIX 5 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 3009 F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2252 F M 2538 IH 35 S IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D M A RIO N R D PVT IH 35 N A C C E S S R D S C H E RTZ P K W Y FM 78 E IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD FM 78 W C R E E K R D GIN R D MIL L E R R D FM 1976 W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1604 N CIB O L O V ALL E Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST L O O K O U T R D S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A EF E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D W IE D E R S T EIN R D S T A P P E R R D PAT BOOKER RD T O LLE R D D E A N R D KITT Y H A W K R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILLE R D M A S K E R D B A T C A V E R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D U NIV E R S A L CIT Y B L V D WIE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NACOGDO CHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N S C H M O E KEL R D N EVANS RD C O L U M B I A M AIN ST Y O U N G S F O R D R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D M O R NIN G SI D E D R A E R O A V E SCHOENTHAL RD O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D H A LLIE H TS BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E ST O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FREUDENBURG RD FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T KIS E R L N IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D O L D CIM A R R O N T R L G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R F O U R T H S T E WALD RD LA Z A R PK W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P AT H WIN N A V E H S T W PLA NE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN S T F O R U M R D W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RILY N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD N S O L M S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A S T E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N S T A N TL E R D R F S T W BALBOA DR H O Y A L N P E C A N D R PHOENIX AVE S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS CORONADO BLVD PATSY DR CREST WAY RD H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y LN G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T T E N E W B E R LIN R D D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T IH 35 S ACCESS RD D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E DONALAN DR TRI-C O U N TY P K W Y T O N K A W A P ASS V A L H A L L A A UTH O RIT Y LN COPPERGATE C A V A N SILV E R WIN G S C E NIC HIL L LN SCHUETZ DR OLD GRAYTO W N RD K U S MIE R Z R D WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGH WAY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T TRIPLE L L N S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R L N WIL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D KIN G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y EL R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV U LT R A LIG H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O TU S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R MEADO W LARK CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T E E VA N S R D C O L E TT E L N L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O ST M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH BORGFELD RD NAC O G DO CH ES LO O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P VT S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y ST S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A TR L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA P T SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WILL O W BLF B R A H M A W A Y MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER WOOD DR B L U E B E LL D R M E S A V E R D E WIN KLE R T RL S A D D L E H O R N W AY KIP P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R PIG A LL E Y E A G L E D R D E N-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D BACALL WAY OAK BLOOM B R O O K L IN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R AY C O R B E TT D R T U R Q U OIS E TA TE S D R M O U NT OLY M P U S IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CIBO L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y SE N N A HILLS D R RED IR O N TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O LDE M O S S PIN G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N FARMVIEW LN C ITADEL P EAK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A L LE Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K LY P E A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VIS T A B L U E S A G E L N STANUSH RD O Z U N A D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A NY W A Y L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W SIL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V ERDE C A TT L E R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S HAD O W Y DUSK COLT TRAIL JEANETTE DR GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R YLLIS H A LLIE L O O P F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N RID G E D R M AY F L O W E R R U S TIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y A N D R E W S AVE F R E A D L N S TILL B R O O K LN P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R IDAMARIE LENO WAY PIN S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N P A T R IC K H E N R Y MALDEN DR PARRY PATH SAVERNE WAY K A U RI C LIF F S C A N T E R B U R Y HILL R AW E AV E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O L L B A RTEN H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL PA T H F IN DE R M U S T A N G V A L LE Y KLEIN CIR LUCILLE NEWNING JU LIA N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R R H EA ST N O TTIN G S HIR E GIN S B E R G D R S A D DLE SP OKE CIB O L O XIN G M E DI A T O R R U N CIB O L O T O LL E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O T H A U D R J E S S E S CIR IH 35 S Y O U N G S F O R D R D IH 1 0 W W EIL R D O A K S T K N E U P P E R R D W E TZ R D N M AIN S T IH 35 N I H 1 0 E PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N FM 78 W S C H A E F E R R D W E TZ R D S PE RIM ETE R R D KUSMIERZ RD H A E C K E R VILL E R D N G R A Y T O W N R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend SchertzWW_CCN_Boundary Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 5 Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Oakmont Place Carmel Ranch Graytown CrossvineModule III Parklands &Parklands II APPENDIX 6 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN IH 35 N F M 3009 F M 78 IH 1 0 E F M 482 F M 1103 E F M 1518 N W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2252 IH 35 S F M 2 538 E LOOP 1604 N IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L LE Y R D M A RIO N R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E B O LT O N R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 78 W W A R E-S E G UIN R D N A B B O TT R D FM 1976 CIB O L O VA L L EY D R C R E E K R D GIN R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T S AV A N N A H D R L O O K O U T R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D WIE D E R ST EIN R D T O LL E R D MIL L E R R D PAT BOOKER RD D E A N R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D PVT H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D W IE D N E R R D KITTY H A W K R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E RIM ET E R R D K O E H L E R R D U N I V E R S A L CIT Y B L V D OLD NACOGDOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N B A T C A V E R D N E V A N S R D R O N R D C O L U M BIA M AIN S T W P E RIM ET E R R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D SCHOENTHAL RD A E R O A V E S C H M O E K EL R D O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D S T A P P E R R D H A LLIE H TS Y O U N G S F O R D R D BIS O N L N DIETZ R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D WALD RD FIF T H S T W N O R T H B LV D O A K S T M O R N IN G SID E D R N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T L A U R A H T S IH 35 S ACCESS RD J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A PL E D R S S A N T A C L A R A R D F O U R T H ST E L AZA R PK W Y E AVIA TIO N B LV D O LD CIM A R R O N T R L O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B OR G F E L D RD N S O L M S R D B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D WIN N A V E H S T W IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D PLA N E LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN S T W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O LL Y LN M A RIL Y N D R F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K ET L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E FREUDENBURG RD T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L LE RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N ST A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS H S T E H O L M A N R D C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E TT E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E F O R U M R D HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B L V D KIL D A R E BALBOA DR DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y V A L H A L L A CRESTWAY RD A U TH O RITY L N COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G S C E NIC HILL L N SCHUETZ DR WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGHW AY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A RIG O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M KIN G 1 S T S T T RIPLE L LN S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H M ID T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R AT E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R TO N K A W A PASS W S C H A E F E R R D KI N G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV U LT R A LIG H T R D CAFFEY RD R E D TIP D R ATHENIAN H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O TU S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIAG O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O RG F ELD R D NACO G D O CHES LO OP C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A LL E Y S T S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VICT O RIA PT SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WIL L O W B L F B R A H M A W AY MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B ELL D R M E S A V E R D E WIN KLER T RL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A RI D R E E V AN S R D PIG A LL E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R DEN-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K LIN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U OIS E T A T E S D R MOUNT OLYMPUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CORDOBA DR C IB O L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y R ED IR O N EL M S T TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y OLDE M OSS PIN G W A Y HICK O RY BEN D C ITADEL P EAK IH 35 N RAMP T E X A S VA L L E Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VIS T A B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A N Y W AY L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S IL V E R B U C K L E M A X FLI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R P E R SIA D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O VE R D E C ATT LE R U N LI G U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D USK AUTUMN HOLW C O LT T R AIL GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K WIN DIN G T R L A M A R Y L LIS H A LLIE L O O P F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W S U N RID G E D R M A YFL O W E R R U STIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B RIC K E LL R D RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A YL A L N C O LIN A W AY F R E A D L N R O B E R T STE V E N S AILE R O N D R S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R P L A N TE R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY PI N S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N T A P W O O D LN SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U R I C LIF F S C A N T E R B U R Y HIL L R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O LL B A RTEN H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL PAT H FI ND ER M U ST A N G V A L L E Y K L EIN CIR MISTY MEADOW NEWNING J U LIA N PT GANDER PARK LIN C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H IR E D R R HEA ST P OS EID O N N O TTIN G SHIRE A U T U M N A R B O R GIN S B E R G D R SADDLE SPO KE CIB O L O XIN G M E D IA T O R R U N CIB O L O T O L L E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N BARKWOOD Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N LY V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O TH A U D R A L A B A S T E R EL GIN P A R K J E S S E S CIR M E A D O W V W A ST W IH 1 0 E K N E U P P E R R D W ET Z R D IH 35 N RAMP N M AIN S T FM 78 W E FM 1518 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E FE R R D IH 35 N S P E RIM E TE R R D O A K S T PFEIL RD W E TZ R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D IH 35 S IH 1 0 W N G R A Y T O W N R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend Schertz_Water_CCN_Service_Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_WaterCCN.mxd . Parklands &Parklands II Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Carmel Ranch Attachment 6 Oakmont Place CrossvineModule III Graytown APPENDIX 7 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 3009 F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2538 G R E E N V A LL E Y R D IH 35 S F M 22 52 IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N M A RIO N R D PVT GIN R D B O LT O N R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 78 W C R E E K R D N A B B O TT R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D MILL E R R D FM 1976 CIB O L O V A LL E Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST E L O O P 1604 N S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A EF E R R D L O O K O U T R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D W E TZ R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D A RIZP E R D WIE D E R S T EIN R D S T A P P E R R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D WIE D N E R R D PAT BOOKER RD N GRAYTOWN RD S C H M O EK E L R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D Y O U N G SF O R D R D OLD NACO G D O CHES RD FM 78 EAST KIT T Y H A W K R D D O E R R LN N EVANS RD ULL RIC H R D M O R NIN G SI D E D R C O L U M B IA M AIN S T SCHOENTHAL RD S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR B A T C A V E R D G O L F R D H A LLIE H T S IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WALD RD BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T FREUDENBURG RD N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A P LE D R F O U R T H S T E N S O L M S R D L AZAR PK W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P A T H W AVIATION BLVD WIN N A V E H S T W PLANE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN ST W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RILY N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N S T A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U ST Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS N PERIMETER RD H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T TE D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E W W E T Z S T DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N TY P K W Y V A L H A L L A A U T H O RITY L N IH 35 S ACCESS RD COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G O A K SID E S C E NIC HIL L LN SCHUETZ DR K U S MIE R Z R D WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGH WAY 81 J O S H S W AY M A RIG O L D W A Y CIR C LE O A K D R S T O R M KIN G 1 S T S T T RIPLE L LN S PERIMETER RD CYPRESS PT B L AZIN G S TA R T R L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PARKVIEW DR N E W B E R LIN R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R ATE D R WIN B U R N AV E PHOENIX AVE S C H N EID E R LN WIL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H LE Y P A R K V A L L EY VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D K IN G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y OLD GRAYTO W N RD K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV ULT R ALIG H T R D C A F FE Y R D R E D TIP D R H A R V E ST B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T C O L E TT E L N L O W E R V A LL E Y L N D R AY T O N H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH BORGFELD RD N A C O G D O C HES LO O P C R E ST O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D S EID E L S T L O O P 5 39 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA P T SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WILL O W BLF B R A H M A W A Y MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B ELL D R M E S A VE R D E WIN KLE R T RL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y KIP P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G TR E E B L F S A F A R I D R PIG A L L E Y E A G L E D R D E N-O T T HILL A S H W O O D R D W UNLES LN OAK BLOOM B R O O K L IN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R A Y C O R B E TT D R T U R Q U OIS E TATE S D R IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CI B O L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y RED IR O N TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W AY O LDE M O SS PIN G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N CITAD EL PE AK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A LLE Y M E A D O W L N E EVA NS RD TITAN P RIC K LY P E A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VI S T A B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B ETH A NY W A Y O A K R D G C A R R A N ZA L N IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W SIL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R I S T W R E D O A K TR L A R R O Y O VER D E C ATT LE R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y SHAD O W Y D U S K DEMETER S U N S E T C V COLT TRAIL JEANETTE DR GULF ST L A H M A V E T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R YL LIS H ALLIE L O OP FA W N P A S S SCARLET CRK RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N RID G E D R M AY F L O W E R R U S TIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K AY L A L N A ND R E WS AVE F R E A D L N S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R IDAMARIE T R A N Q UIL L N LENO WAY PIN S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N P A T R I C K H E N R Y MALDEN DR SAVERNE WAY K A U RI C LIF F S C A N TE R B U R Y HILL R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R US H L N HID D E N K N O L L B A RTEN H EIM DR RUSTIC TRL PATH F IN DE R M U S T A N G V A L LE Y KLEIN CIR LUCILLE NEW NI NG J U LIA N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R R H EA ST P O SEI DON N O TTIN G S HIR E GIN S B E R G D R SADDLE SPO KE CIB O L O XIN G M E DI A T O R R U N CIB O L O T O LL E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O TH A U D R J E S S E S CIR N M AIN S T E FM 1518 N Y O U N G S F O R D R D FM 78 W IH 1 0 W IH 35 S O A K ST S P E RIM ETE R R D W EIL R D W ET Z R D IH 35 N IH 1 0 E PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D W E TZ R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D WEICHOLD RD Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Wastewater CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJCommercial Parcels Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcels Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 7 APPENDIX 8 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN IH 35 N F M 3009 IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D F M 2252 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 25 38 IH 35 S E L O O P 1604 N FM 1516 N I H 1 0 W G R E E N V A LL E Y R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D M A RIO N R D S C H E R TZ P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 N A B B O TT R D B O LT O N R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D F M 7 8 W CIB O L O V A LLE Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST L O O K O U T R D PVT GIN R D S A V A N N A H D R C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D MIL LE R R D C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D A RIZ P E R D C R E E K R D WIE D E R ST EIN R D W E TZ R D PAT BOOKER RD T O L L E R D KIT T Y H A W K R D D E A N R D PFA N N S TIE L LN BOENIG DR B A T C A VE R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D U NIV E R S A L C IT Y B L V D WIE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E PE RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D OLD NACOGDOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N N E V A N S R D C O L U M BIA S T A P P E R R D M AIN S T S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O AV E IH 3 5 S A C C E S S R D O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H M O E K EL R D H A L LIE H T S BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E ST O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D Y O U N G SF O R D R D FIFT H S T W N O R T H BLV D O A K ST N M AIN S T O LD CIM A R R O N T R L R O N R D KIS E R L N G E R D ES R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A PL E D R F O U R T H S T E M O R N I N G SID E D R LA Z A R P K W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B OR G F E L D RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D W IN N A V E F O R U M R D H ST W PLA NE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN ST W A H L L N S S A N T A C L A R A R D T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RIL Y N D R F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIVE R R D MAIN CIR N O R- T E X D R CIB O L O T RL H O LL E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN PATSY DR BALBOA DR S T ATIO N S T PHOENIX AVE A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D CORONADO BLVD T HIR D S T W CREST WAY RD T O W N C R EE K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS M EA D O W LA R K H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E TT E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y K R U E G E R C A N Y O N 1 ST S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N TY P K W Y TO N K A W A P ASS V A L H A L L A A U T H O RIT Y L N COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G S C E NIC HILL L N WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N J O S H S W A Y M A RI G O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M K IN G 1 S T S T TRIPL E L LN S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L AB BEY RD PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R LN W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A LL E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D KIN G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV U LT R A LIG H T R D CAFFEY RD R E D TIP D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC WIL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T RIT O NE E VAN S R D P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O ST M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O RG F ELD R D NACO GD OCHES LOOP C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E VA L L E Y S T S U M A C LN J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S RD DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA PT SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WIL L O W B LF B R A H M A W A Y M IL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER WOOD DR B L U E B ELL D R M E S A V E R D E WINKLE R TRL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A RI D R PIG A L L E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R D E N-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K LIN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R AY C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U OIS E TA TE S D R MOUNT OLYMPUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CIBO L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y S E N N A HILL S D R RED IR ON E L M ST GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O LDE M O S S PIN G W A Y HIC K O R Y B E N D PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N CITA DEL PEAK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A LL E Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K L Y PE A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V IS T A GAMBELS QUAIL B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A N Y W AY L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S IL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C ATTLE R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y SHAD O W Y D U S K AUTUMN HOLW C O LT T R AIL GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K WIN DIN G T R L A M A R YLLIS H ALLIE LO OP F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD IR O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W S U N RID G E D R M A YFL O W E R R U STIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B RIC K EL L R D RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y F R E A D L N R O B E R T S T E V E N S AIL E R O N D R S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R PL A N T E R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY PI N S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N PARRY PATH TA P W O O D L N SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U RI C LI F F S C A N T E R B U R Y HIL L R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O LL B A RTE N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P AT HFI ND E R M U S T A N G V A LLE Y KLEIN CIR NEWNING J U LIA N P T SENECA CRK LIN C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R RH E A S T N OTTIN G S HIR E A U T U M N A R B O R TORONTO DR GIN S B E R G D R SADD LE SPO K E CIB O L O XIN G B RIA R K N O L L M E D IA T O R R U N CIB O L O T O L L E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R OTH AU D R A L A B A S TE R EL GIN P A R K J E S S E S CIR A ST W W E T Z R D FM 78 W W E TZ R D IH 1 0 E N M AIN ST IH 35 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E FE R R D O A K S T Y O U N G S F O R D R D S PERIM E TER R D E FM 1518 N PFEIL RD H A E C K E R VIL L E R D I H 1 0 W IH 35 S Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Water CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcel Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-WaterCCN.mxd . Attachment 8 APPENDIX 9 - WASTEWATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 482 C R EE K R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM E TE R R D G E R D E S R D G O LF R D W E S T O N R D ST O L TE R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P AT H F M 7 8 O PIE L N EL B E L R D LOOP 539 E N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN A P G L N BOENIG DR BUNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D OLD GRAYTO W N RD H O L M A N R D TRIPLE L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EID E R L N F R O B O E S E L N FM 78 EAST VOGES PASS OLD NAC O G D O C H E S R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 2252 DAVIE LN F M 2 5 3 8 RETAMA PKWY W EIR R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R C A L E D R MIL L E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D S C H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A L LE Y R D PIP E S T O N E GIN R D T O LL E R D ARIZPE RD B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D K RIE W A L D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D B AT C A V E R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 78 W MIDAS E F M 15 18 N WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N ACCESS RD KIS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E T Z R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A N TA C L A R A R D FF S T E EVANS RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D K R U E G E R C A N Y O N S A F A RI D RCINNABAR C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N E F M 1 51 8 N B U N K E R ST E LOOP 1604 N F M 2538 E FM 1518 N FM 78 F M 2252 B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D W E T Z R D E F M 1518 N B U N K E R S T N ABBOTT RD FM 78 E F M 2 25 2 FM 2538 F M 2252 F M 1103 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D M A RIO N R D P F A N N STIE L L N FM 78 F M 7 8 W ST O L TE R D F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D F M 3009 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 48 2 W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2252 F M 482 F M 3009 FM 78 W A L D R D FM 482 W EIL R D F M 2 25 2 F M 1103 E F M 1 5 1 8 N IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 3009 HAECKERVILLE RD FM 22 5 2 FM 78 E PFEIL RD B O LT O N R D FM 482 F M 4 8 2 N A B B O T T R D F M 3009 W E IR R D F M 4 8 2 W E TZ R D L O WE R S EG UI N RD FM 78 FM 482 D E A N R D FM 482 ZUEHL RD FM 78 W FM 78 W EIL R D FM 2538 FIF T H ST E E N G E L R D SCHOENTHAL RD IH 35 N A C C E S S R D F M 78 FM 482 F M 3009 W EIL R D A RIZ P E R D T O LL E R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 3 00 9 I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D Legend ETJSchertz City Limit Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Sewer Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Sewer CCN Map.mxd 8/8/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 9 APPENDIX 10 - WATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 482 C R E E K R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM ETE R R D G E R D E S R D G O L F R D W E ST O N R D S T O LT E R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P A T H F M 7 8 O PIE L N E L B EL R D LOOP 539 E N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR RETAMA PKWY BUNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E TT E TRIP LE L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EID E R L N F R O B O E S E L N FM 78 EAST O L D N A C O G D O C HES R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 22 52 DAVIE LN W EIR R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R F M 2 5 3 8 C A LE D R MILL E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D SC H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A LL E Y R D PIP E S T O N E GIN R D T O LL E R D ARIZPE RD B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D K RIE W A L D L N S M AIN ST Y O U N G SF O R D R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 78 W MIDAS E F M 15 18 N WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N AC C ESS RD KIS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E TZ R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A NTA C L A R A R D F F S T W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D S A F A RI D RCINNABAR C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N T O L L E R D P F A N N STIE L L N W E T Z R D S T O LT E R D E FM 1 51 8 N FM 78 F M 4 8 2 Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 2252 F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D E FM 1518 N LOW ER SE GU IN R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 482 E FM 1518 N SCHOENTHAL RD FM 78 A RIZ P E R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D N ABBOTT RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482FM 482 W E IR R D F M 3009 F M 2 25 2 F M 2252 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D F M 1103 B O LT O N R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 E F M 1 518 N B U N K E R S T W ETZ R D PFEIL RD HAECKERVILLE RD F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D FM 78 H A E C K E R VIL L E R D ZUEHL RD F M 1103 FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D F M 3009 W EIL R D FM 78 W F M 2 252 N A B B O TT R D B U N K E R ST M A RIO N R D FIF T H S T E F M 4 8 2 FM 78 F M 3 00 9 D E A N R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2 2 52 F M 3009 FM 2538 FM 78 E IH 35 N A C CES S R D FM 78 E F M 7 8 W W EIL R D B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 48 2 F M 7 8 FM 2538 F M 3009 FM 482 E N G E L R D F M 3009 FM 482 F M 2538 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 3009 F M 2252 PFEIL RD FM 78 Legend ETJ Schertz City LimitSchertz Water CCN Service AreaSchertz Water CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Water Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Water CCN Map.mxd 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Attachment 10 APPENDIX 11 - NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 12 - 2030 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 13 - 2030 WATER CIP MAP 2030 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 14 - 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 15 - 2050 WATER CIP MAP 2050 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 16 - FLOW METER, METER BASIN, & RAIN GAUGE LOCATION MAP ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ FM01 FM04 FM02 FM03 FM12 FM14FM06 FM05FM13 FM08 FM09 FM07 FM15 FM10 FM11 RG01 RG02 RG06 RG05 RG04 RG03 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_1_RainGauge_FlowMeterBasins.mxd Attachment 1 Flow Meter, Meter Basin, and Rain Gauge Location8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend ^_Flow Meter ÔÕ Rain Gauge ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Gravity Main CCMA SchertzFlow Meter Basins BasinID FM01 FM02 FM03 FM04 FM05 FM06 FM07 FM08 FM09 FM10 FM11 FM12 FM13 FM14 FM15 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 17 - DRY WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 18 - WET WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 19 - EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION RESULTS, SURCHARGE, & SSO LOCATION MAPS ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4 4.A 4.B 4.C 4.D 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.550.275 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.A Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.20.1 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.B Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.C Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.30.15 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.D Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 20 - NEAR TERM WASTEWATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NEAR TERM WASTE WATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 21 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 22 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main SARA's System Lines Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 23 - SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend SSO #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ Gravity Line Gravity Line 2030 New Growth CIP SARA's System Lines SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS /0 1.5 30.75 Miles SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS APPENDIX 24 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 25 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2050 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 26 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ SARA's System Lines Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 27 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 28 - INFLATION RATE CALCULATION SOURCES Year San Antonio Index Difference 2024 249.7 -4.7 2023 254.4 21 2022 233.4 33.9 2021 199.5 4 2020 195.5 11 2019 184.5 3.5 2018 181 5.5 2017 175.5 2.4 2016 173.1 1.3 2015 171.8 2.3 2014 169.5 5.2 2013 164.3 3.6 2012 160.7 8.1 2011 152.6 4.7 2010 147.9 26.6 2005 121.3 21.9 2000 99.4 1.4 1999 98 3.2 1998 94.8 1.4 1997 93.4 4.5 1995 88.9 8.2 1990 80.7 6.8 1985 73.9 18.9 1980 55 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2024 128%6.31% 2010 to 2024 169%3.81% 2000 to 2024 251%3.91% 1990 to 2024 309%3.38% 1980 to 2024 454%3.50% RSMeans Historical Inflation Indexes Year National Index Difference 2023 Q4 182.5 0.1 2023 Q3 182.4 0.4 2023 Q2 182 2.3 2023 Q1 179.7 1.1 2022 178.6 11.2 2021 167.4 29.6 2020 137.8 2.8 2019 135 4.2 2018 130.8 8.5 2017 122.3 4.8 2016 117.5 3.6 2015 113.9 3 2014 110.9 3.6 2013 107.3 3.7 2012 103.6 2.6 2011 101 4.6 2010 96.4 2.6 2009 93.8 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 132%9.65% 2010 to 2023 188%5.93% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes (Base 2009) Year Average Index Difference 2023 1373 78 2022 1295 96 2021 1199 22 2020 1177 21 2019 1156 60 2018 1096 58 2017 1038 49 2016 989 46 2015 943 41 2014 902 38 2013 864 34 2012 830 18 2011 812 13 2010 799 -33 2009 832 -76 2008 908 54 2007 854 61 2006 793 76 2005 717 62 2004 655 34 2003 621 2 2002 619 6 2001 613 18 2000 595 25 1999 570 21 1998 549 24 2010-1996 rates are stored online and can be provided if desired 1997 525 20 1996 505 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 117%5.27% 2010 to 2023 172%4.25% 2000 to 2023 231%3.70% 1996 to 2024 272%3.77% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes APPENDIX 29 - CIP PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-W1**Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 27%$206,715 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 0%$0 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 0%$0 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 0%$0 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 0%$0 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 0%$0 NT-W7**Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 69%$1,077,040 NT-W8**FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 22%$194,778 NT-W9**Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 0%$0 NT-W10**Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 0%$0 $23,206,556 -$1,478,532 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 100%$4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 89%$1,272,934 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 97%$3,569,245 2030-W4**Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 93%$9,192,317 2030-W5**Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 69%$4,411,757 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 100%$32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 33%$1,737,667 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 100%$6,063,000 $69,503,000 -$63,109,920 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 0%$0 2030-W10**River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 58%$1,354,926 $2,738,000 -$1,354,926 $72,241,000 -$64,464,846 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 $68,177,000 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 $4,775,000 $72,952,000 $168,399,556 $65,943,379 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. System Improvement Projects System Improvement Projects 2050 Growth Subtotal: Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050 CIP Projects are not included in this impact fee total. 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WATER CIP TOTAL: 2030 TOTAL: 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 21%$1,440,972 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 0%$0 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24"$10,425,000 23%$2,378,763 NT-S4**Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 20%$771,788 NT-S5**Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 25%$526,887 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 83%$13,523,463 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 74%$2,517,091 $45,760,800 -$21,158,965 NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 0%$0 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 0%$0 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 0%$0 $1,763,000 -$0 $47,523,800 -$21,158,965 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 67%$1,359,153 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8"$1,338,000 5%$68,849 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 10%$249,210 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 12%$47,722 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8"$1,663,000 83%$1,372,188 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 33%$1,613,509 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 100%$1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8"$475,000 100%$475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10"$2,525,000 100%$2,522,465 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10"$1,038,000 100%$1,034,756 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8"$3,113,000 97%$3,012,264 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"$400,000 40%$160,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 99%$2,677,145 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"$2,963,000 29%$849,531 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8"$1,275,000 52%$661,379 $29,342,000 -$18,041,171 2030 SI-1**Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 22%$1,833,143 2030 SI-2**Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 9%$121,579 2030 SI-3**Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 4%$46,406 2030 SI-4**Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 4%$13,741 2030 SI-5**Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 61%$3,099,614 2030 SI-6**Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 5%$392,686 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 0%$0 $24,527,000 -$5,507,169 $53,869,000 -$23,548,341 2050-S1 I-35 N 8"$9,088,000 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8"$6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8"$2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8"$1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 $28,865,000 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 $5,602,000 $34,467,000 $135,859,800 $44,707,306 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. Near Term CIP Growth Projects System Improvement Projects 2030 TOTAL: 2050 Growth Subtotal: 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term Growth Subtotal: Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WASTE WATER CIP TOTAL: System Improvement Projects 2050 CIP projects are not eligible to be included in the impact fee total. Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Waste Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update CCMA System Improvement Projects - Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Project Number Project Name Project Cost 2030 C-1 Roy Richard Drive Replacements $1,588,000 2030 C-2 Valencia Lane Replacements $2,288,000 2030 C-3 Savannah Drive Replacements $12,425,000 2030 C-4 Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line $12,950,000 $29,251,000CCMA System Improvement Projects Total: CCMA System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP NEAR TERM WATER CIP PROJECTS Justification: 1 LF 1,320 135$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 7,000$ 21,000$ 3 EA 3 8,500$ 26,000$ 4 EA 27 2,100$ $56,700 4 LF 660 196$ 130,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 446,000$ $23,000 $134,000 $610,000 $153,000 $763,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION System Improvement ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Service & System Connections SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W1** Project Category:Water CIP Type: Project Location: City identified CIP.Replace leaking 6" from River Rd to just south of Cibolo Creek along Bubbling Springs with 12", approximately 1,320 LF. Project Description: UNIT COST TOTAL PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control 1 LS 1 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station (2,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST. Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), construction is currently underway. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2,000 gpm Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W2 1 LS 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Controls ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W3 Project Description: Justification: Control improvements at Ware Seguin Pump Station to be per GST level rather than a timer. Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 1 LF 5,150 135$ $696,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 907,000$ $46,000 $273,000 $1,230,000 $308,000 $1,538,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W4 Project Location: Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Justification: Approximately 5,150 LF of 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin in open field. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL $455,555.79 Justification: Approximately 2,270 LF of 12" from Fred Couples to Schwab. Total cost shown is portion paid for by the City. Currently under construction. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Fred Couples to Schwab Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LF 5,400 135$ $729,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 *LS 1 16,000$ $16,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 941,000$ $48,000 $283,000 $1,280,000 $320,000 $1,600,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 5,400 LF of 12" from Schwab to Eckhardt. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schwab to Eckhardt Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 5,200 135$ $702,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 913,000$ $46,000 $274,000 $1,240,000 $310,000 $1,550,000 TOTAL Currently in design. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Approximately 5,200 LF of 12" along IH-10 from N. Graytown Rd to Pfeil Rd. Project Description: ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Graytown to Pfeil Project Number:NT-W7** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 2,300 135$ $310,500 2 EA 5 7,000$ $35,000 3 EA 5 8,500$ $42,500 4 EA 46 2,100$ $96,600 5 LS 1 8,000$ $8,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 518,000$ $26,000 $156,000 $700,000 $175,000 $875,000 Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Service & System Connections 12" Water Line Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Project Category:Water CIP Type:System Improvement Phase: Near Term ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8"/10" to 12" along FM 78 from east of Bubbling Springs Rd to end of dead-end line, approximately 2,300 LF. SWPPP Project Number:NT-W8** MOBILIZATION (5%) Project Name:FM 78 Water Line Replacement Justification: 1 LF 4,970 85$ $423,000 2 EA 10 7,000$ $70,000 3 EA 10 8,500$ $85,000 4 EA 100 2,100$ $210,000 5 LF 4,970 190$ $945,000 6 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 1,773,000$ $89,000 $532,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 $3,000,000 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 4" to 8" along Moonlight Meadow Dr and Lost Meadows Dr north of Schaefer Rd, approximately 4,970 LF. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name: Project Number:NT-W9** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 6,670 135$ $901,000 2 EA 14 7,000$ $98,000 3 EA 14 8,500$ $119,000 4 EA 134 2,100$ $281,400 5 LF 6,670 196$ $1,307,320 6 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 $2,751,000 $138,000 $826,000 $3,720,000 $930,000 $4,650,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8" to 12" along Robin Hood Way, approximately 6,670 LF. Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Robinhood Way WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W10** Project Category:Water 2030 WATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,060 170$ $1,030,200 2 EA 13 8,900$ $115,700 3 EA 13 10,700$ $139,100 4 LF 6,060 247$ $1,496,000 5 LS 1 22,000$ $22,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,835,000 $142,000 $851,000 $3,830,000 $958,000 $4,788,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W1 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 1,750 170$ $297,500 2 EA 4 8,900$ $35,600 3 EA 4 10,700$ $42,800 4 LF 1,750 247$ $432,000 5 LS 1 7,000$ $7,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $847,000 $43,000 $255,000 $1,150,000 $288,000 $1,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 1,750 LF of 12" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 5,590 110$ $614,900 2 EA 12 3,800$ $45,600 3 EA 12 10,700$ $128,400 4 LF 5,590 239$ $1,337,000 5 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,178,000 $109,000 $654,000 $2,950,000 $738,000 $3,688,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 8" loop north of Lower Seguin Rd, east of Ray Corbett Dr (approximately 5,590 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W3 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 2,960 170$ $503,200 2 LF 9,650 110$ $1,061,500 3 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 4 EA 20 3,800$ $76,000 5 EA 26 10,700$ $278,200 6 EA 253 2,650$ $670,450 7 LF 12,610 247$ $3,112,000 8 LS 1 46,000$ $46,000 9 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $5,833,000 $292,000 $1,750,000 $7,880,000 $1,970,000 $9,850,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line 8" Water Line 12" Gate Valve Service & System Connections Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W4** Project Category:Water CIP Type:Growth Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to supply new service area. Project Description: Upsize approximately 2,960 LF of 2" to 12" along Trainer Hale Rd east of FM 1518; and 9,650 LF of new 8" loop north of Trainer Hale Rd, east of FM 1518. Project Location: Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement 8" Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Justification: 1 LF 8,600 110$ $946,000 2 EA 18 3,800$ $68,400 3 EA 18 10,700$ $192,600 4 EA 172 2,650$ $455,800 5 LF 8,600 239$ $2,057,000 6 LS 1 31,000$ $31,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $3,783,000 $190,000 $1,135,000 $5,110,000 $1,278,000 $6,388,000 Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. Project Description: Upsize approximately 5,300 LF of 6" to 8" along Boenig Dr south of N Graytown Rd, and 3,300 LF new 8" along future Binz-Engleman Rd. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:Growth 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W5** Project Category:Water 1 LF 20,000 570$ $11,400,000 2 EA 40 25,700$ $1,028,000 3 EA 40 10,700$ $428,000 4 EA 16 17,700$ $283,200 5 EA 16 23,200$ $371,200 6 LF 20,000 269$ $5,388,000 7 LS 1 72,000$ $72,000 8 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $19,003,000 $951,000 $5,701,000 $25,660,000 $6,415,000 $32,075,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: Justification: Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission line (approximately 20,000 LF). In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control ARV (1") CAV (3") Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 24" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LS 1 2,518,000$ $2,518,000 2 EA 2 189,000$ $378,000 3 EA 1 126,000$ $126,000 4 LS 1 63,000$ $63,000 $3,085,000 $155,000 $926,000 $4,170,000 $1,043,000 $5,213,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W7 Project Location: Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 1,000 GPM GW Well 1,000 GPM Pump for PS VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 1 - Expand Ware Seguin to firm pumping capacity of 1,000 gpm, 105 TDH; and new groundwater well to provide supply to Ware Seguin. Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. 1 LF 4,300 230$ $991,000 2 EA 9 8,200$ $73,800 3 EA 9 23,100$ $207,900 4 LF 4,300 515$ $2,215,000 5 LS 1 34,000$ $34,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,590,000 $180,000 $1,077,000 $4,850,000 $1,213,000 $6,063,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 4,300 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and Scenic Lake Dr. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 70,000$ $140,000 2 EA 1 80,000$ $80,000 3 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 $239,000 $12,000 $72,000 $330,000 $83,000 $413,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" PRV Connection/Operations Expenses Justification: 3 new PRVs (2-6", 1-8") to create new pressure zone in southwest part of system. Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W9 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Description: 6" PRV 1 LF 2,590 170$ $440,300 2 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 3 EA 6 10,700$ $64,200 4 EA 52 2,650$ $137,800 5 LF 2,590 247$ $639,000 6 LS 1 10,000$ $10,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $1,377,000 $69,000 $414,000 $1,860,000 $465,000 $2,325,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,590 LF of ex. 6" to 12" along River Rd from FM 78 to Bubbling Springs Rd to remove bottleneck. Removes system bottleneck. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:River Rd 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W10** Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line Gate Valve 2050 WATER CIP PROJECTS  1 EA 1 543,000$     $543,000 2 EA 1 272,000$     $272,000 3 LS 1 163,000$     $163,000 $978,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station Expansion - Expand Corbett to 4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 2,000 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station Expansion Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W1 1 LF 6,290 230$ $1,450,000 2 EA 13 8,200$ $106,600 3 EA 13 23,100$ $300,300 4 LF 6,290 515$ $3,240,000 5 LS 1 49,000$ $49,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $5,214,000 $261,000 $1,565,000 $7,040,000 $1,760,000 $8,800,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 6,290 LF of 8" along FM 2252 and new loop. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 2252 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 461,000$ $922,000 2 EA 2 272,000$ $544,000 3 LS 1 147,000$ $147,000 $1,613,000 $81,000 $484,000 $2,180,000 $545,000 $2,725,000 Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 - Expand Ware Seguin to 1,200 gpm, 123 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 1,200 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W3 1 LF 3,270 230$ $754,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 EA 66 5,700$ $376,200 5 LF 3,270 515$ $1,685,000 6 LS 1 26,000$ $26,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,129,000 $157,000 $939,000 $4,230,000 $1,058,000 $5,288,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 1,590 LF of 6" to 8" along Beck St east of Schertz Pkwy, 1,680 LF of new 8". Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Beck St 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W4 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LF 3,100 230$ $715,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 LF 3,100 515$ $1,597,000 5 LS 1 24,000$ $24,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,624,000 $132,000 $788,000 $3,550,000 $888,000 $4,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 3,100 LF of new 8" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 1 14,232,000$ $14,232,000 2 LS 1 3,031,000$ $3,031,000 3 LS 1 922,000$ $922,000 4 LS 1 85,000$ $85,000 5 LS 1 6,723,000$ $6,723,000 $24,993,000 $1,250,000 $7,498,000 $33,750,000 $8,438,000 $42,188,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Foundation for GST Connect to 24" Main Pump Station Project Description: Justification: IH-35 Pump Station (4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST, new connection from SSLGC transmission main to the Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission main. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth 3.0 MG GST Yard Piping & Pumps for GST 1 LF 2,110 230$ $487,000 2 EA 5 8,200$ $41,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 LF 2,110 515$ $1,087,000 5 LS 1 17,000$ $17,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $1,816,000 $91,000 $545,000 $2,460,000 $615,000 $3,075,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 2,110 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and FM 1518. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W7 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 2,500 366$ $915,000 2 EA 5 19,000$ $95,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 EA 50 5,700$ $285,000 5 LF 2,500 531$ $1,329,000 6 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,828,000 $142,000 $849,000 $3,820,000 $955,000 $4,775,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,500 LF of 8" to 12" along Lower Seguin Rd.Needed for fire flow. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Capacity 12" Water Line Gate Valve NEAR TERM WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,600 360$ 2,376,000$ 2 EA 14 17,000$ 238,000$ 3 LF 6,600 214$ 1,413,000$ 4 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 4,071,000$ $204,000 $1,222,000 $5,500,000 $1,375,000 $6,875,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 1) with approximately 6,600 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 4,470 130$ 582,000$ 2 EA 9 17,000$ 153,000$ 3 LF 4,470 214$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1,730,000$ $87,000 $519,000 $2,340,000 $585,000 $2,925,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 2) with approximately 4,470 LF of 12-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 10,060 360$ 3,622,000$ 2 EA 20 17,000$ 343,000$ 3 LF 10,060 214$ 2,153,000$ 4 LS 1 29,000$ 29,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 6,172,000$ $309,000 $1,852,000 $8,340,000 $2,085,000 $10,425,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase V with approximately 10,060 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase V 24"Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S3 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: Justification: 1 LF 3,910 200$ 782,000$ 2 EA 8 17,000$ 133,000$ 3 LF 3,128 100$ 313,000$ 4 LS 1 203,000$ 203,000$ 5 LF 3,910 205$ 802,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 2,270,000$ $114,000 $681,000 $3,070,000 $768,000 $3,838,000 Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Lateral Lines Operational Expenses SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) TOTAL Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:Growth Project Location: Project Description: Lookout Line (8") upsized to 18-inch gravity line (~ 3,910 LF). Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Upsize Lookout Line Project Number:NT-S4** Waste Water Growth Justification: 1 LF 3,910 234$ 916,000$ 2 LS 1 1,168,800$ 1,168,800$ $2,084,800 UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. Project Description: Tri County Line upsized from 8-inch gravity line to 18-inch gravity line (~ 1,760 LF). Note: Costs provided by City. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Remaining Costs Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Category: CIP Type: Project Name:Upsize Tri County Line Project Number:NT-S5** 1 LF 21,680 200$ 4,336,000$ 2 EA 43 17,000$ 738,000$ 3 LF 21,680 205$ 4,445,000$ 4 LS 1 62,000$ 62,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 9,606,000$ $481,000 $2,882,000 $12,970,000 $3,243,000 $16,213,000 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Project Description: Project Location: SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Justification: Cibolo West Main with approximately 21,680 LF of 18-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cibolo West Main Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S6 $9,600,000 $13,000,000 $3,400,000 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S7 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL ELIGIBLE* PROJECT COST Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,940 LF of 18-inch gravity line serving Hallie’s Cove. Approximately 12,550 LF of 30-inch gravity line, approximately 5,990 LF of 14-inch force main, and WHC lift station. CostS provided by the City. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. *Only the cost increase between 2011 & 2024 is eligible to be included in the impact fee total. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST (2011) ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2024) 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ $3,000 $15,000 $70,000 $18,000 $88,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Tri County LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Tri County Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal Decommission Lift Station Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LF 2,410 105$ 254,000$ 3 EA 5 17,000$ 85,000$ 4 LF 2,410 193$ 466,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 888,000$ $45,000 $267,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Corbett LS to go offline. Approximately 2,410 LF of 10-inch gravity line installed to connect to existing system. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Corbett Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal SWPPP Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Decommission WWTP Project Description: Justification: Sedona LS to go offline and Woman Hollering Creek (WHC) WWTP decommissioned. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station & WWTP Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-3 2030 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 2,950 107$ 316,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,950 239$ 706,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,194,000 $60,000 $359,000 $1,620,000 $405,000 $2,025,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,950 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of Old Wiederstein Rd and along Hope Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S1 1 LF 1,900 107$ 204,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,900 239$ 455,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $785,000 $40,000 $236,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,900 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Old Wiederstein Rd from Dean Rd to vicinity of Kaylee Chase. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Old Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S2 1 LF 3,750 107$ 402,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 3,750 239$ 897,000$ 4 LS 1 14,000$ 14,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,517,000 $76,000 $456,000 $2,050,000 $513,000 $2,563,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,750 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S3 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S4 1 LF 2,400 107$ 257,000$ 2 EA 5 21,400$ 107,000$ 3 LF 2,400 239$ 574,000$ 4 LS 1 9,000$ 9,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $979,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,400 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Wiederstein Rd between Jupe and Quail Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S5 1 LF 7,300 107$ 782,000$ 2 EA 15 21,400$ 321,000$ 3 LF 7,300 239$ 1,746,000$ 4 LS 1 27,000$ 27,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $2,908,000 $146,000 $873,000 $3,930,000 $983,000 $4,913,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 7,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Schaefer Rd , Lisa Meadows and Voges pass. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S6 1 LF 2,800 107$ 300,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,800 239$ 670,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,142,000 $58,000 $343,000 $1,550,000 $388,000 $1,938,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Schaefer Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S7 1 LF 550 107$ 59,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 43,000$ 3 LF 550 239$ 132,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $274,000 $14,000 $83,000 $380,000 $95,000 $475,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Aranda, north of Chalk Stem. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Aranda 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S8 1 LF 3,500 132$ 463,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 150,000$ 3 LF 3,500 239$ 838,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,496,000 $75,000 $449,000 $2,020,000 $505,000 $2,525,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,500 LF of 10-inch gravity line west of Weir Rd and north of Trainer Hale Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Weir Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S9 1 LF 1,350 132$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 65,000$ 3 LF 1,350 239$ 323,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $607,000 $31,000 $183,000 $830,000 $208,000 $1,038,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,350 LF of 10-inch gravity line along Trainer Hale Rd, east of E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Trainer Hale Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S10 1 LF 4,550 107$ 487,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 214,000$ 3 LF 4,550 239$ 1,089,000$ 4 LS 1 17,000$ 17,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,839,000 $92,000 $552,000 $2,490,000 $623,000 $3,113,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Ware Seguin Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S11 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line along E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 1518 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S12 1 LF 4,000 107$ 428,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 4,000 239$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,604,000 $81,000 $482,000 $2,170,000 $543,000 $2,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,000 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S13 1 LF 4,350 107$ 466,000$ 2 EA 9 21,400$ 193,000$ 3 LF 4,350 239$ 1,041,000$ 4 LS 1 16,000$ 16,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,748,000 $88,000 $525,000 $2,370,000 $593,000 $2,963,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,350 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Boenig Dr and Ware Seguin Rd going north. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Boenig Drive 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S14 1 LF 1,800 107$ 193,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,800 239$ 431,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $750,000 $38,000 $225,000 $1,020,000 $255,000 $1,275,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E and along N Greytown Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:N Greytown Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S15 Justification: 1 LF 6,500 252$ 1,637,000$ 2 EA 13 21,400$ 279,000$ 3 LF 5,200 126$ 655,000$ 4 LS 1 535,000$ 535,000$ 5 LF 6,500 258$ 1,678,000$ 6 LS 1 24,000$ 24,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 4,840,000$ $242,000 $1,452,000 $6,540,000 $1,635,000 $8,175,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Traffic Control ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Operational Expenses Surface Replacement System Improvement To resolve 4 SSOs upstream of Friesenhahn LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~4,900 LF), parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and an existing 12-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,600 LF) immediately upstream of the Friesenhahn LS. Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost 2030 SI-1** Project Category:Waste Water Project Location: Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name:Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize Project Number: CIP Type: Justification: 1 LF 1,320 132$ 175,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 57,000$ 3 LF 1,056 126$ 133,000$ 4 LS 1 87,000$ 87,000$ 5 LF 1,320 243$ 321,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 813,000$ $41,000 $244,000 $1,100,000 $275,000 $1,375,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Fairlawn WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-2** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO upstream of Riata LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 10-inch gravity line (~1,320 LF) along Fairlawn Ave from Ashwood Rd to Riata LS. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 1,150 164$ 189,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 50,000$ 3 LF 920 126$ 116,000$ 4 LS 1 81,000$ 81,000$ 5 LF 1,150 247$ 284,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 760,000$ $38,000 $228,000 $1,030,000 $258,000 $1,288,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-3** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO near I 35 N. Project Description: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~1,150 LF), south of I-35 N and east of Hampton Inn & Suites of Schertz. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 250 164$ 41,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 11,000$ 3 LF 200 126$ 26,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LF 250 247$ 62,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 198,000$ $10,000 $60,000 $270,000 $68,000 $338,000 Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Woodland Oak Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-4** Project Location: Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~250 LF), near Woodland Oak Dr. To resolve an SSO near Woodland Oak Dr. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP Justification: 1 LF 3,330 378$ 1,258,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 143,000$ 3 LF 2,664 126$ 336,000$ 4 LS 1 330,000$ 330,000$ 5 LF 3,330 263$ 877,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 2,988,000$ $150,000 $897,000 $4,040,000 $1,010,000 $5,050,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 21" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Old Wiederstein WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-5** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To increase line capacity. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Description: Replacing an existing 18-inch with 21-inch gravity line (~3,330 LF), along Old Wiederstein Rd. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LS 1 4,637,000$ 4,637,000$ $4,637,000 $232,000 $1,392,000 $6,270,000 $1,568,000 $7,838,000 Project Location: TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (2,750 gpm) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Date: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade Project Number:2030 SI-6** 2030Phase: Northcliffe LS upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm. Project Description: Justification: To follow TCEQ requirement of peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 4,485 gpm. 1 LS 1 63,000$ 63,000$ 2 LF 420 107$ 45,000$ 3 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 4 LF 420 239$ 101,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 271,000$ $14,000 $82,000 $370,000 $93,000 $463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Belmont Park LS to go offline; install approximately 420 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along Livingston Dr. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-7 1 LF 1,220 252$ 308,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 53,000$ 3 LF 976 126$ 123,000$ 4 LS 1 101,000$ 101,000$ 5 LF 1,220 258$ 315,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 940,000$ $47,000 $282,000 $1,270,000 $318,000 $1,588,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 15-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,220 LF), east of Roy Richard Dr and south of Woodland Oaks Dr. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Roy Richard Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-1 1 LF 1,780 252$ 449,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 77,000$ 3 LF 1,424 126$ 180,000$ 4 LS 1 147,000$ 147,000$ 5 LF 1,780 258$ 460,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 1,353,000$ $68,000 $406,000 $1,830,000 $458,000 $2,288,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,780 LF), north of Woodland Oaks Dr and east of Valencia Ln. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Valencia Lane Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-2 1 LF 5,230 806$ 4,214,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 224,000$ 3 LF 4,184 126$ 527,000$ 4 LS 1 818,000$ 818,000$ 5 LF 5,230 292$ 1,528,000$ 6 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,362,000$ $369,000 $2,209,000 $9,940,000 $2,485,000 $12,425,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,230 LF), south of Savannah Dr and north of Live Oak Rd. To resolve an SSO near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Savannah Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-3 1 LF 5,450 806$ 4,391,000$ 2 EA 11 21,400$ 234,000$ 3 LF 4,360 126$ 549,000$ 4 LS 1 852,000$ 852,000$ 5 LF 5,450 292$ 1,592,000$ 6 LS 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,670,000$ $384,000 $2,301,000 $10,360,000 $2,590,000 $12,950,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,450 LF), near Community Cir, from Buffalo Dr to Live Oak Rd. To resolve 2 SSOs near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-4 2050 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,250 230$ 1,441,000$ 2 EA 13 46,100$ 600,000$ 3 LF 6,250 515$ 3,220,000$ 4 LS 1 49,000$ 49,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 5,378,000$ $269,000 $1,614,000 $7,270,000 $1,818,000 $9,088,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 6,250 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and along I-35 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name: I-35 N 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S1 1 LF 4,460 230$ 1,028,000$ 2 EA 9 46,100$ 415,000$ 3 LF 4,460 515$ 2,298,000$ 4 LS 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,844,000$ $193,000 $1,154,000 $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,460 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Friesenhahn Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Friesenhahn Lane 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S2 1 LF 3,910 230$ 901,000$ 2 EA 8 46,100$ 369,000$ 3 LF 3,910 515$ 2,014,000$ 4 LS 1 31,000$ 31,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,383,000$ $170,000 $1,015,000 $4,570,000 $1,143,000 $5,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,910 LF of 8-inch gravity line from Schaefer Rd north parallel to Authority Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S3 1 LF 1,930 230$ 445,000$ 2 EA 4 46,100$ 185,000$ 3 LF 1,930 515$ 995,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,708,000$ $86,000 $513,000 $2,310,000 $578,000 $2,888,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,930 LF of 8-inch gravity line, south of Corbett Junior High School and north of Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett JH 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S4 1 LF 830 230$ 192,000$ 2 EA 2 46,100$ 93,000$ 3 LF 830 515$ 428,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 789,000$ $40,000 $237,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 830 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S5 1 LF 2,220 230$ 512,000$ 2 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 3 LF 2,220 515$ 1,144,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,973,000$ $99,000 $592,000 $2,670,000 $668,000 $3,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,220 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and parallel to IH-10. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S6 1 LS 1 865,000$ 865,000$ 865,000$ $44,000 $260,000 $1,170,000 $293,000 $1,463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (~250 gpm) Project Description: Justification: Cypress Point LS upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm. To follow TCEQ requirement of Peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 1,233 gpm. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-1 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Schertz Pkwy LS to go offline. To convey flow to a new CCMA's line which will be built by 2050. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-2 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 2 LF 2,300 230$ 530,000$ 3 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 4 LF 2,300 515$ 1,185,000$ 5 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 6 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 2,168,000$ $109,000 $651,000 $2,930,000 $733,000 $3,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Park LS to go offline; install approximately 2,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along E Aviation Blvd. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-3 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Cover’s Cove LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-4 WATER MASTER PLAN MAP / 0 7,000 14,0003,500 Feet Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 2050-W5 2050-W7 2050-W4 2050-W1 2050-W6 2050-W2 2050-W3 2050-W8 2030-W8 2030-W9 2030-W5 2030-W9 2030-W9 2030-W7 2030-W4 2030-W3 2030-W2 2030-W10 2030-W6 2030-W1 NT-W10 NT-W4 NT-W3 NT-W2 NT-W9 NT-W1 NT-W8 NT-W5 NT-W6 NT-W7 Water CCN Boundary Existing Water Lines City Limits/ETJ Legend 2022 - 2050 Anticipated Development Water Line Improvements Pump Station Improvements Proposed PRV WASTEWATER MASTER PLAN MAP / 0 7,500 15,0003,750 Feet Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community NT-S1 NT-S3NT SI-1 NT-S2 NT-S5 NT-S4 NT SI-2 NT-S6 NT SI-3 NT-S7 2030-S15 2030-S14 2030-S13 2030-S12 2030-S11 2030-S9 2030-S10 2030-S8 2030-S7 2030-S6 2030-S5 2030-S2 2030-S1 2030-S4 2030-S3 2030 SI-5 2030 SI-7 2030 SI-1 2030 SI-6 2030 SI-2 2030 SI-3 2030 SI-4 2050 S-5 2050 S-1 2050 S-2 2050 S-3 2050 S-4 2050 SI-2 2050 SI-1 2050 SI-4 2050 SI-3 2050 S-6 Gravity Line No Improvement Lift Station City Limits / ETJ Sewer CCN Boundary Force Main Outfall Legend No Improvement Lift Station CIP Wastewater CIP PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 01/22/2025 Agenda Item 7 A   SUBJECT Current Projects and City Council Status Update   DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The following is being provided for information purposes only so that the Planning and Zoning Commission is aware of the current status of new site plan applications, status of applications heard by the Commission and recommended for final action by the City Council, and the status of administratively approved applications.  NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following new Site Plan Applications were submitted from November 27, 2024, to January 17, 2025.  AutoZone Store #9315,  5468 FM 1103 An approximately 7,485 square foot Auto Parts Store  Eckhardt Road Retail  24736 IH 35N An office / retail development consisting of 5 buildings with a total floor area of 54, 975 square feet CITY COUNCIL RESULTS: The following development applications were recommended for final action to the City Council.  Ordinance 24-S-167 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 100 acres of land from General Business District (GB) and Agricultural District (AD) to Manufacturing Light District (M-1) and Apartment / Multifamily District (R-4) generally located at the intersection of Schwab Road and IH 35, more specifically  known as Comal County Property Identification Numbers 79017, 75463, 79018, and 75468, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas.  Approved at the December 3, 2024 City Council Meeting.  Ordinance 24-S-170 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow Mixed-Use Self-Storage in General Business District (GB) on approximately 3.6 acres, located along the IH-35 North access road, near the intersection of Cibolo Valley Drive, more specifically known as a portion of Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 185564, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Approved at the December 3, 2024 City Council Meeting.  Ordinance 24-S-169 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately .23 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), more specifically known as 702 Main Street, also known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 21458, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Approved at the December 3, 2024 City Council Meeting.  Ordinance 24-S-168 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 1.66 acres of land from General Business District (GB)  and Single Family Residential District (R-2) to Main Street Mixed Use District (MSMU), more specifically known as 819, 817, and 815 Main Street and 810 Exchange Avenue, also known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 29057, 29058, 29059, 29060, 67493, 67495 City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Approved at the December 3, 2024 City Council Meeting.  Ordinance 24-S-159: Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 3.014 acres of land to Agricultural District (AD), more specifically known as a portion of Comal County Property Identification Number 79004, Comal County, Texas.  Approved at the December 3, 2024 City Council Meeting.   Ordinance 25-S-002 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 85 acres of land, from Agricultural District (AD) to approximately 30 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-6) and approximately 55 acres as Single-Family Residential District (R-2), generally located 2,000 feet North of the intersection of Weir Road and Trainer Hale Road, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310048 and 1190132, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.  Approved at the January 7, 2025 City Council Meeting   Ordinance 25-S-001 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 26 acres of land, from Single-Family Residential District (R-2) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as a portion of Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 64640, generally located 78 feet South of the intersection of Savannah Drive and Irish Creek Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Denied at the January 7, 2025 City Council Meeting  Ordinance 25-S-003 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 20 acres of land from General Business District (GB), Agricultural District (AD), and Pre-Development District (PRE) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5), more specifically known as 5524 Eckhardt Road, also known as a portion of Comal County Property Identification Numbers 75449 and 78233, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas.   Approved at the January 7, 2025 City Council Meeting   Ordinance 25-S-004 - Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs.   Tabled for further discussion at the January 7, 2025 City Council Meeting.  Scheduled to be heard at the February 4, 2025 City Council Meeting.  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED PROJECTS: The following projects were administratively approved from November 27, 2024, to January 17, 2025.  Final Plat establishing the Schertz Logistics Subdivision   Final Plat of an approximately 42.98-acre tract located at approximately 2,200 feet northwest of the intersection of IH 35 and FM 2252.  Final Plat establishing the Schertz Storage Center Subdivision   Final Plat of an approximately 7.776-acre tract located approximately 2,300 feet east of the intersection of IH 35 and FM 2252.  Minor Plat establishing The Crossvine Module 3A, Unit 1 Lots 1, 2, and 3 Blck 4  Minor Plat to create 4 residential lots located on Chalk Trace in The Crossvine Subdivision  Replat establishing Live Oak Hills Subdivision Lot 17, Block 49   Replat of an approximately 9.936-acre tract located on Wiederstein Road, the proposed location for Fire Station #4  Site Plan for the Saddlebrook Amenity Center  Site plan of an approximately 2.975-acre lot to create the amenity center for the Saddlebrook Subdivision located on Redbud Canyon  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: 01/22/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Capital Improvement Advisory Committee PREPARED BY:Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer SUBJECT:Hold a public hearing for a presentation, discussion, and possible action to approve a recommendation regarding an update to the City of Schertz Water and Wastewater Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plans, and Impact Fees to be assessed.   GENERAL INFORMATION The City desires to update its capital recovery fees, or impact fees, in order to appropriately fund construction of new facilities and expand existing facilities to serve future development.  The fees consider and apply to water and wastewater projects identified on the City's Water and Wastewater Impact Fee CIP necessary to support growth and development.  To formulate the fees to be assessed, land use assumptions that project growth over a planning period must be established.  Additionally, Capital Improvement Plans that address the needs of that growth must be prepared and approved. The purpose of the impact fee is to provide a funding mechanism for the implementation of the water and wastewater capital improvements over a planning period.  The impact fee program facilitates the funding participation of new development at a fair rate based on the demand placed on the City's water transmission and distribution and wastewater collection and conveyance systems by the development. An initial step in the update of the impact fee is the establishment of land use assumptions including population and employment projections over the 30-year planning period (2020-2050).  The assumptions include the type, location, quantity, and timing of land uses.  The Land Use Assumptions report (LUA) includes a description of the methodology used in preparation, explanation of the data considered, and presentation of historical and projected growth trends. The other major step in the update of the impact fee is the preparation of Water and Wastewater Capital Improvement Plans (CIPs).  The proposed CIP for water was developed based on a hydraulic model of the existing water system, application of growth projections to that model, and identification of improvement projects needed to meet TCEQ minimum requirements for water service.  The proposed CIP for wastewater was developed based on a hydraulic model of the existing collection and conveyance system, application of growth projections to that model, and identification of improvement projects needed to provide required capacity within the sewer system.  Individual projects are identified and are spread as appropriate over the planning period into the categories of near term, 2030, and 2050 projects for planning purposes.  Projects may shift in time based on actual patterns of development and the plan should be reviewed and updated as needed in five years.  The projects that make up the Capital Improvement Plans have also been configured in such a way to serve as updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans for development. After the summation of CIP costs, the totals are reduced by the amount of utility service revenues expected to be generated by development over the program period and used to pay for improvement costs.  Once growth rates have been established and CIP costs minus the calculated revenue credit determined, those values are used in the calculation of a cost per service unit (land use equivalent or LUE) for both water and wastewater.  Those resultant amounts are the updated maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fees. During its meeting on January 8, 2025, the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee held a workshop that included presentation and discussion of the LUAs and CIPs.  This Public Hearing includes a recap of those plan elements, presentation of the determination of maximum assessable fees calculated, and a discussion of recommendation to City Council regarding adopting the Update to the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff has presented the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee (CIAC) and Planning and Zoning Commission (P&Z) with the proposed Water and Wastewater Master Plan Updates, updated Land Use Assumptions, and Capital Improvement Plans that establish the basis for calculation of updated maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fees. After the public hearing and Committee discussion, Staff is prepared to guide the CIAC through the process of generating a recommendation to City Council regarding adoption of the updated Water and Wastewater Impact Fee documents, rates, and phase-in schedule. Attachments 2024 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report  2024 Water Impact Fee CIP Map  2024 Wastewater Impact Fee CIP Map  City of Schertz 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report Prepared By: Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc, 215 Mary Avenue, Suite 309 Waco, Texas 76701 254-753-9585 January 2025 TBPE Firm No. 2614 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Schertz (City) contracted Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) to analyze and update the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. This report summarizes the process used to calculate the water and wastewater impact fees for the 2020 – 2030 planning period, which was done in accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) Section 395. This study included the development of land use assumptions and growth projections, which were used to estimate future water and wastewater demands. Hydraulic models for both the water and wastewater systems were created by LAN based on data obtained from the City and the estimated future demands. The results of these models highlighted areas in both systems with insufficient capacity or would be throughout the planning period. Capital improvement plans for both systems were then developed and broken out into three separate groups: Near Term, 2030, and 2050. Projects included in the 2050 CIP are not eligible to be included in this impact fee update as TLGC Section 395 limits the planning period to 10 years. Estimated costs were developed for each project and can be found in Appendix 29. The 2030 and 2050 costs were multiplied by an average construction inflation factor to ensure estimates accurately captured the project costs in the future. Only the percentage of each project being utilized during the 10-year planning period was included to calculate the total impact fee eligible costs. Additionally, only the projects or portions of projects needed due to growth are included in the total impact fee eligible costs. The increase in Living Unit Equivalents (LUEs) for the water and wastewater system were determined by comparing the flow results from the two hydraulic models to the existing system flows. The City of Schertz is unique in that the water and wastewater Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) do not match exactly, so the increase in LUEs for the two systems are slightly different. To obtain the maximum allowable impact fee for both systems, the total impact fee eligible costs were divided by the respective growth in LUEs. The tables below show this process for each system. Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $65,943,379 Credit (Calculated: 5.1%) ($3,365,530) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $62,577,849 Growth in LUEs 7,100 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee per LUE $8,814 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 1 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $44,707,306 Credit (Calculated: 8.6%) ($4,611,802) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $40,095,504 Growth in LUEs 7,217 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee per LUE $5,556 Part of the update to the impact fees included updating the water meter types and characteristics to correspond with the new meters that the City will now be utilizing. The maximum allowable impact fees by meter type were calculated by multiplying the LUE per meter size by the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees shown in the tables above. The table below reflects both the update to the impact fees by meter type and the new meter characteristics. Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Proposed LUE Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8" MULTI-JET 15 1.0 $8,814 $5,556 3/4" MULTI-JET 20 1.3 $11,810 $7,445 1" MULTI-JET 30 2.0 $17,627 $11,112 2" ULTRASONIC 250 16.7 $146,924 $92,615 3" ULTRASONIC 500 33.3 $293,848 $185,231 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 66.7 $587,607 $370,406 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 106.7 $940,154 $592,639 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 186.7 $1,645,248 $1,037,104 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 ENGINEER’S SEAL & LAN FIRM NO. HERE 01/17/2025 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 2 Table of Contents City of Schertz 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan, CIP, & Impact Fee Update ........... 0 1. BACKGROUND & REGULATIONS .............................................................................. 6 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................... 8 2.1 Data Review & Methodology ............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions ............... 9 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections ................................................................................... 10 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates ........................................................................................... 13 2.5 Future System Modeling ................................................................................................. 14 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP ..................................................................... 15 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System .......................................................... 15 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP .......................................................................... 36 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP......................................................... 49 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System ..................................................................... 49 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation ......................................................................... 58 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs ............................................................... 60 5. IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 69 5.1 Living Unit Equivalent ...................................................................................................... 69 5.2 Cost Data ........................................................................................................................ 70 5.3 Inflation Rate Calculation ................................................................................................ 71 5.4 Project Costs Eligibility .................................................................................................... 72 5.5 Water Meter Updates ...................................................................................................... 76 5.6 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees .................................................................................... 77 5.7 Comparison of Local Impact Fees ................................................................................... 80 6. LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................. 81 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 3 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements ................................... 11 Table 2: Population Projections .................................................................................................... 11 Table 3: Housing Projections ........................................................................................................ 11 Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates ....................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Household Size Projections ............................................................................................ 12 Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections ........................................................... 13 Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ...................................................... 15 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ........................................................... 16 Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System ......................................... 20 Table 10: Well Capacities ............................................................................................................. 23 Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments ................................................................................... 24 Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities .............................................................................................. 24 Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities ............................................................................... 25 Table 14: Pump Capacities .......................................................................................................... 25 Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane.......................... 26 Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane ............................... 28 Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation ......................................................... 31 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation ...................................................................... 33 Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation .............................................................. 34 Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary ....................................................................... 37 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 39 Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 39 Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 39 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 43 Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 44 Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 44 Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 44 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 48 Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary ............................. 51 Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 53 Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties .............................................................................................. 54 Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions .................................................................................... 54 Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters .......................................................................................... 56 Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 57 Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins ........................... 58 Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections ...................................................................................... 60 Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities .................................... 61 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 4 Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities ....................................................................... 61 Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls ................................................ 62 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary ...................................................................................... 63 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 64 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 65 Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary ................................................. 65 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 66 Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 66 Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation .................................................................................... 67 Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation ................................................................................... 68 Table 48: Calculations for Growth in Water LUEs ........................................................................ 69 Table 49: Calculations for Growth in Wastewater LUEs ............................................................... 69 Table 50: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations ................................................................................. 71 Table 51: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 73 Table 52: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 73 Table 53: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 74 Table 54: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ............................... 74 Table 55: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 75 Table 56: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 76 Table 57: CCMA 2030 System Improvement Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ..................... 76 Table 58: Existing & Proposed Meter Characteristics ................................................................... 77 Table 59: Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee ........................................................................ 78 Table 60: Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee ............................................................... 79 Table 61: Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size ............................................................ 79 Table 62: Local Impact Fee Comparison ...................................................................................... 80 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 5 List of Figures Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters ................ 17 Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters ................... 17 Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows ...................................................................................................... 18 Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model ........................... 19 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours ................................................. 22 Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours ................................................. 22 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures ............................................................... 27 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures .................................................................... 29 Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations ...................................................................................... 30 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation ................................................................................ 32 Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation ............................................................................................. 33 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation ..................................................................................... 35 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 40 Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels .......................................................................... 40 Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 41 Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels ............................................................................... 41 Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels ........................................................................ 42 Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 45 Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels ......................................................................... 45 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 46 Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls ................................................................................. 46 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels .......................................................................... 47 Figure 24: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System .................................... 50 Figure 25: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern .................................................................................. 52 Figure 26: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot .......................................................................... 52 Figure 27: RTK Method Parameters ............................................................................................. 55 Figure 28: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot ......................................................................... 57 Figure 29: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm ..................................................................................... 59 Figure 30: AACE Cost Estimate Clases ....................................................................................... 70 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 6 1. BACKGROUND & REGULATIONS Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) Section 395 provides provisions to “generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development”. Impact fees cannot be applied to existing customers. The City of Schertz (City) contracted Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) to analyze and update the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. This report summarizes the process used to calculate water and wastewater impact fees for the 2020 – 2050 planning period, which was done in accordance with TLGC Section 395. Within Section 395 there are procedures and regulations for adopting and updating water and wastewater impact fees that require an impact fee analysis be performed before the new or updated impact fees can be imposed. In accordance with Section 395, only the following items are payable by the impact fee: · Construction Contract Price · Surveying & Engineering Fees · Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees. · Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision. · Projected interest charges and other financing costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used to reimburse bond funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan. Additionally, Section 395 lists the items that are not payable by the impact fee: · Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan. · Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facility expansions. · Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards. · Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development. · Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision, except the Edwards Underground Water District or a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that function as impact fees may use impact fees to pay its administrative and operating costs. · Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness, except as allowed by Section 395.012. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 7 With these regulations in mind, LAN updated the City’s land use assumptions, developed hydraulic water and wastewater models, identified capital improvement projects and their usage attributable to new development, and calculated the updated water and wastewater impact fees. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 8 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Land use assumptions are required to be periodically updated in accordance with TLGC Section 395.052. These assumptions form the basis for analyzing existing and future water and wastewater needs based on growth projections. This section describes how LAN performed a land use assessment, developed growth projections, and applied this data to the hydraulic water and wastewater models which are discussed later in this report. 2.1 Data Review & Methodology 2.1.1 City Provided Data Data and resources necessary for LAN to assess current and future land uses, development projections, and Water and Wastewater service networks were provided by the City. Sources available up to December 31, 2021 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. The plan was modified based on residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. This includes the following: · GIS Shapefiles o Received by LAN in the December 2019 data package from the City  Shapefiles in this data package included: · Comprehensive Land Use · Zoning Ordinances · Water and Wastewater infrastructure · CCN Service Areas · Municipal Boundaries · Customer Meters · Subdivision Land Use Statistics · Residential Land Use Forecasts o Microsoft excel spreadsheet received by LAN in April 2020 from the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development. · 2018 City of Schertz Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map · 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumption Report by Freese and Nichols, Inc. 2.1.2 AAMPO TAZ Data Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) demographic databases were used to determine the City’s growth projections. TAZs are the geographic units used to inventory existing and future demographic data required for modeling purposes. TAZ data included 2020, 2025, 2035, and 2045 population, number of households, average household size, and employment inventories for the study area. Databases were downloaded from the AAMPO website in the form of GIS shapefiles and concentrated to correctly reflect the City’s extent. It should be noted that TAZ demographic data from 2020 was provided to LAN separately from the 2025-2045 projected demographic data. Because the 2020 data package was a direct result from the official 2020 Census and the projected data was calculated by AAMPO before 2020, LAN identified discrepancies in growth rates between the years 2020 and 2030 for population and employment. For the purpose of this Land Use Assessment, population and employment data between the years 2020 and 2030 was interpolated to reflect consistent growth rate throughout the 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 9 planning period. LAN has communicated with AAMPO about the data discrepancies and will update all projections accordingly for future system modeling. At the request of City staff, the projected growth rate for each 5-year period was increased by 0.1% to be conservative. These adjusted population numbers are presented in subsequent sections. 2.1.3 Planning Period This Comprehensive Land Use Assessment utilizes a 30-year planning period from 2020 to 2050. Because the AAMPO TAZ demographic data is limited to the year 2045, demographics were projected to 2050 by assuming the same compound annual growth rate (CAGR) established in 2045. 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions 2.2.1 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions by Freese and Nichols, Inc. The 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions Report identified land use assumptions and recommendations for the City over a 10-year planning period ending in 2027. Upon completion of this 2021 Comprehensive Land Use Assessment, LAN has identified that the following assumptions from the 2017 Report will remain true for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050: · Territories south of Randolph Air Force Base are impacted by restrictions based on Air Impact Compatible Use Zones (shown on the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map as Attachment 1). Restrictions include limits on residential development densities. · Continued commercial and residential development pressure in the North from New Braunfels will impact growth around the City. 2.2.2 Assumptions Made by LAN A series of assumptions in relation to the City’s land use and future development have been made by LAN after completing this Land Use Assessment. The following assumptions were made to initiate updates to the water master plan and CIP: · Land uses identified in the 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map were modified based on updated residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. It is assumed that these developments will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. The names and location of these updated developments are labeled on Appendix 5 and Appendix 6. · Land use data available up to April 8th, 2022 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. · New growth throughout the 30-year planning period will expand away from the City center, where the highest densities of development currently exist. · Continued development pressure in the North along the IH-35 corridor and from New Braunfels will result in future residential and commercial development at higher densities throughout the north, than in the south. · Territories under delayed annexation agreements with the City will be annexed by 2025. The annexation of these territories will expand municipal boundaries. · Regions within Municipal Boundaries that do not currently lie within City water or wastewater Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN)s identified by the Public Utilities 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 10 Commission (PUC) are serviced by other authorities and will remain so throughout the 30-year planning period. · The existing water and wastewater CCNs will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections 2.3.1 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan The City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is included in this report as Appendix 1 and serves as a provisional guideline for future development across the City. The land uses identified in the 2018 map provide a framework that will be reflected by the City’s future development decisions. The exception is the area south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518. Recent land use plan amendments in this area include zoning changes based on data available up to October 1st, 2022. 2.3.2 Zoning The City’s existing zoning ordinances are included in this report as Appendix 2. The existing zoning ordinances were published in 2019 and serve as a means for which the 2018 Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan will be implemented. Based on land use data available up to October 1st, 2022 (including residential subdivision development information received from the City), the 2019 zoning designations were updated. It is assumed for the purposes of this study, that the zoning identified in Attachment 2 will remain in place for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050 apart from areas south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518 and areas just north of Trainer Hale Rd which are already approved for rezoning as of May 26, 2022. All existing and future subdivisions are shown in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.3 Delayed Annexation Agreements Zoning ordinances were used to locate territories around the City under delayed annexation agreements. Territories under delayed annexation agreements currently exist within zones of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), which constrain the City’s growth. These territories are primarily located throughout the Northeast corner of the City extending toward New Braunfels and in the Southeast between FM 1518 and IH-10. 2.3.3.1 Annexation Schedule The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with timelines for completing existing annexation agreements. The City Plans for the existing annexations to be completed by 2025. 2.3.3.2 Supported Land Uses of Territories to be Annexed Table 1 summarizes the supported land uses of the territories under delayed annexation agreements. The annexation data provided to LAN was geographically categorized between the north and south. The location of the areas under a delayed annexation agreement is illustrated in Appendix 2 and the supported land uses for future development of these area is presented in Appendix 9 & 10. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 11 Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements Delayed Annexation Agreements: Parcel Land Use Supported Land Uses(1) Total Parcels Total Acreage Single-Family Residential Lots Allowed Commercial Parcels North Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 43 1,037 822 2 South Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 86 3,110 2,000 5 (1)For the purpose of this assessment, single-family residential land use includes Agricultural Conservation, Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and Estate Neighborhood 2.3.4 Population Projections Table 2 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize population projections over the 30- year planning period ending in 2050. Combining these projections with development anticipated as of October 1st, 2022, Projections suggest that population is expected to steadily increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.%. Appendix 3 presents 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) population distribution across the City, reflecting the population increase provided in Table 2. Table 2: Population Projections Population Projections (Cumulative) (1) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate - 1.8% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% Population 45,719 49,985 55,187 60,933 66,946 73,553 80,416 Total Increase (+) 4,266 5,202 5,745 6,013 6,607 6,863 (1)Total population accounts for areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2.3.5 Residential Land Use Table 3 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize projections for the total number of households over the 30-year planning period. Future residential development across the City is expected to reflect population growth and increased traffic along IH-35. The number of households is expected to increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average CAGR of 2.2%. 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) residential housing distribution across the City are shown in Appendix 4. Because AAMPO TAZ data does not categorize residence type, the housing projections include both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 3: Housing Projections Housing Projections (Cumulative) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(1)(2) - 3.2% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% Households 15,441 18,034 20,305 22,640 25,120 27,735 30,742 Total Increase (+) 2,593 2,271 2,335 2,480 2,615 2,737 (1)Total number of households accounts for all categories of residential housing units throughout the City (2)Total number of households accounts for all residential housing units located within areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 12 The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with maximum build- out estimates for existing and planned single-family and multi-family residential developments throughout the City. Appendix 5 & 6 shows the location and density of these subdivisions in comparison to the Wastewater and Water Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCNs) service areas. Appendix 5 & 6 serves as an exhibit of where the City is allowed to provide services and where their population may be distributed. Table 4 summarizes the maximum build-out estimates. According to this data, approximately 90% of the existing and planned residential developments are single-family residential. Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates Residential Type Land Use Statistics Single-Family Multi-Family Number of Households Expected at Maximum Build-Out for Existing and Planned Subdivisions(2) 20,102 3,339 (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2.3.5.1 Single-Family Residential Development The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates that single-family is the primary type of residential land use throughout the City. Over the 30-year planning period, development pressure along IH-35 and from New Braunfels will impact the distribution of residences across the City. Single-family housing density is expected to be higher in the north throughout this corridor. However, in the southern portion of the City, west of FM 1518, residential development will primarily consist of lower density rural and estate style subdivisions. It is anticipated that additional single-family development will occur east of FM 1518 based on recent requested and authorized zoning changes. 2.3.5.2 Multi-Family Residential Development Currently, multi-family residential establishments are located centrally in the City and account for a small percentage of the City’s residential type land uses. While the number single-family residences will continue to dominate over the 30-year planning period, data provided by the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development notes a few new multi-family residential subdivisions have been planned. These developments are primarily located in the northeast between IH-35 and the Schertz City Limits, with one in the southern portion of the City. The location and density of these three developments are included in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.5.3 Average Household Size Table 5 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize the average number of persons per household over the 30-year planning period. Because AAMPO TAZ data did not categorize residence type, household size accounts for both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 5 indicates the average household size will remain close to three persons over the 30-year planning period. Table 5: Household Size Projections Average Household Size Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Persons(1)(2) 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 (1)All categories of residential housing throughout the City are accounted for (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 13 2.3.6 Commercial Land Use The Comprehensive Land Use Plan implies that commercial type land uses will continue to exist primarily along major thoroughfares in the north surrounding IH-35, in the south surrounding IH-10, and centrally surrounding FM 3009. The number and location of existing and planned commercial-type parcels were provided by the City in the form of a GIS Shapefile, shown in Appendix 7 & 8. These exhibits show the Wastewater and Water CCN service areas, respectively, to compare where the City is allowed to provide service to where they can expect commercial development. It was determined that AAMPO TAZ data for the number of persons employed throughout the City could reflect the number of commercial-type establishments. The CAGR for employment was used to project the number of commercial establishments over the 30-year planning period. Table 6 summarizes the employment projections, CAGR, and anticipated number of commercial establishments. Increased traffic and population among the IH-35 corridor could result in a higher demand for commercial property development in the North. Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections Employment Projections (Cumulative) Historical(1) 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(2) - 0.8% 0.8% 3.0% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% Persons Employed 21,437 22,363 23,288 24,213 27,305 30,397 33,839 Commercial Parcels 313 327 340 394 445 495 551 Total Increase in Commercial Parcels (+) 14 14 54 50 50 56 (1)Employment and commercial projections include areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for which growth is constrained 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates The City’s existing Water and Wastewater certificates of convenience and necessity (CCNs) identified by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) were reviewed to identify areas the City is currently serving as well as resolve where the City may be servicing outside their PUC identified CCN boundaries. Per correspondence on August 11, 2021, it was decided that the current water and wastewater CCN service areas would remain unchanged for the 30-year planning period. This conservative approach would allow the City to monitor potential CCN changes as development occurs and to adapt using the 5-year impact fee cycle in lieu of wholesale CCN change assumptions for the next 30 years. The City is aware that some regions within their municipal City Limits currently exist outside their water and wastewater CCN service areas and will remain under the service of their existing providers throughout the 30-year planning period. Likewise, regions annexed into the City during the 30-year planning period will not be added to the City’s water and wastewater CCN service areas if they are not currently located within the service areas. The existing water and wastewater CCN service areas can be seen in Appendix 9 & 10. These exhibits present the land use categories used in the development of population projection allocations, calculations of future demands, and wastewater loading development. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 14 2.5 Future System Modeling To develop future conditions for water and wastewater system modeling the existing system models will be modified to reflect the assumptions made in this report. Assumptions and projections made for City growth, land uses, and development are used to establish and allocate future demands and supply requirements for the required planning period. In general, the expansion of Municipal Boundaries throughout the planning period will result in City-wide growth and the extension of water and wastewater service networks. Projected residential and commercial development throughout the planning period will produce increased water and wastewater flows. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 15 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System This section provides an overview of the existing system model evaluation and the assessment of the results against the TCEQ requirements for system storage capacity, supply, service capacity, and minimum pressure requirements for public water systems. 3.1.1 Updates to Existing System Model LAN built a hydraulic model of the City’s existing water distribution system in Bentley’s WaterGEMS software using data provided by the City. The model and the Technical Memo with model build details and preliminary model verification results for the existing system were presented to the City at a review meeting on September 10, 2020. After the existing water system review meeting on September 10, 2020, the following items were updated in the hydraulic model to better reflect existing conditions: · Wholesale Customer Demands · Residential Water Usage Patterns · Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings · Removal of Waterlines Not in Service 3.1.1.1 Wholesale Customer Demands Meter usage data from the City of Selma and City of Cibolo was provided to LAN by the City and were used to identify average and peak day demands at the wholesale customers’ meters. Average day demands and peak day demands were input into the existing system model at each customer meter location and are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8, respectively. Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 16 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 3.1.1.2 Residential Water Usage Patterns During the review of the existing system model with the City, it was noted that the residential water usage patterns did not reflect the observed peak hour usage for the Schertz water system. With only monthly flow monitoring data available from the City, updated representative average day and peak day water usage patterns for residential customers was developed using an American Water Works Association report. The updated water usage patterns were developed using the 1993 American Water Works Association (AWWA) Residential Water Use Patterns report using data. The City of Norman, Oklahoma was selected to best represent residential water use patterns for the City of Schertz because of similarities in annual precipitation, average seasonal temperatures, and land use. The AWWA report provided separate usage pattern for both single and multi-family land use types and these patterns were used to update the residential and apartment demands in the existing system model. The average day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use were developed using the Norman info provided in the 1993 report. The average to peak multipliers, used to develop the peak day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use, were calculated using the 36 months of billing data provided to LAN by the City. These average to peak multipliers are: · Single-Family = 3.2 · Multi-Family = 2.6 The Single-Family and Multi-Family average day and peak day diurnal curves used in the existing system model are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 17 Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 18 3.1.1.3 Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings Comments provided by the City describe that the PRVs separating the Live Oak and I-35 pressure planes do not open under typical average day conditions but do open under peak day conditions. The City indicated that under peak day conditions these valves open around 4:30 am and stay open until around midnight. To simulate these conditions, the assumption was made that, all PRVs were given the same pressure setting. On the Live Oak side of the pressure plane boundary, under peak day conditions, and with all the valves closed, observed pressures at the PRVs averaged 67-psi. Therefore, a pressure setting of 67- psi was tested in the model to see if the PRVs would open during the simulation in the window of time provided by the City. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway is at a lower elevation of 713-ft (approximately 14 feet lower than the other PRVs). It was assumed that it was unlikely to open in tandem with the other four PRVs on this pressure plane boundary. The results showed all PRVs were open during a window of time similar to the one provided by the City, except the PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway as assumed. Flow through the four PRVs that opened throughout a 24-hour EPS peak day scenario at a pressure setting of 67-psi is shown in Figure 3. The PRVs shown in Figure 3 are primarily open between 4:30 am and midnight. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway was not shown because it did not open at any time during the 24-hour EPS peak day scenario. Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 19 3.1.1.4 Removal of Waterlines Not in Service The waterlines shown in Figure 4 were removed from the existing system model. While the lines are planned, the City reported that these waterline segments designated as “Active” in the waterline shapefile, were not yet in service. They will be included in the future conditions model. Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model 3.1.2 Public Water System Evaluation Criteria To evaluate the City’s existing system model, criteria were developed in accordance with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Public Drinking Water Rules and Regulations for Public Water Systems found in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 290.D. The TCEQ Rules and Regulations provide minimum capacity requirements for public water systems. The rules and regulations effective January 3, 2019 are applied in this analysis. Several of the evaluation criteria are calculated based on the number of connections in the existing system model. The City of Schertz reports 16,434 connections in the existing water system as of December 15, 2020. The City operates their existing water system as three pressure planes, Scenic Hills, I-35, and Live Oak. For the purposes of this evaluation the system will be assessed as one contiguous network because of the interactions between the existing pressure planes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 20 Extended period simulations were performed using Bentley’s WaterGEMS software which provided the tools and results necessary to assess the existing system model according to the TCEQ criteria for the following: · 24-hour Average Day Flow (ADF) · 24-hour Peak Day Flow (PDF) · 48-hour Peak Daily Plus Fire Flow Analysis The key criteria for the City’s existing system are summarized in Table 9. Detailed results for the evaluation criteria are discussed in the order as they appear in Table 9 throughout this section. Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 21 3.1.2.1 Supply & Storage TAC 290.45.a “Sources of supply, both ground and surface, shall have a safe yield capable of supplying the maximum daily demands of the distribution system during extended periods of peak usage and critical hydrologic conditions. The pipelines and pumping capacities to treatment plants or distribution systems shall be adequate for such water delivery. Minimum capacities required are specified in §290.45 (relating to Minimum Water System Capacity Requirements).” A 24-hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario, beginning at midnight, was run for the existing system under peak day conditions. Over the 24-hour simulation, it was observed that both the I-35 elevated storage tank (EST) and the Live Oak ground storage tank (GST) water supply did not recover to at least the same percent full as it was set to at the beginning of the simulation. Figure 5 shows the I-35 EST and Live Oak GST capacities over the 24-hour simulation. In Figure 5, the I-35 EST begins the simulation at 98% capacity and ends the simulation at 20% capacity. Likewise, the Live Oak GST begins the simulation at 83% capacity and ends the simulation at 56% capacity. Because the tanks did not recover by the end of the 24-hour simulation, the run time was lengthened to 48-hours to assess if the tanks recovered by peak hour (5:00 am) and if the decline in tank level continued throughout the second day. Figure 6 shows that neither tank recovers and the Live Oak GST almost drains completely by hour 48. The observed results indicate that the existing system model’s water supply would be incapable of supplying peak day demands for an extended period as stated in TAC 290.45.a. The City did not indicate that they have issues filling the Live Oak EST or GST as severely as seen in the existing system model. A meeting was held to discuss this issue, and additional information about the system and SCADA was provided to LAN. With this information, the model was re-calibrated, and the results more closely reflected what the Live Oak EST and GST were experiencing. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 22 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 23 3.1.2.2 Wholesale Supplier Requirements TAC 290.45.e “The following requirements apply to systems which supply wholesale treated water to other public water supplies: Wholesalers must provide enough production, treatment, and service pumping capacity to meet or exceed the combined maximum daily commitments specified in their various obligations.” “… minimum water system capacity requirements shall be determined by calculating the requirements based upon the number of retail customer service connections of that wholesale water supplier, if any, fire flow capacities required by chapter 290.46, and adding that amount to the maximum amount of water obligated or pledged under all wholesale contracts, if required.” The minimum required water supply is of 0.6 gpm per connections. For Schertz’s 16,434 connections this minimum water supply is approximately 9,860 gpm. The combination of water supplies is 10,400 gpm as shown in Table 10. · Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) is the main supply of water to the existing system. Based on monthly flow monitoring data provided by the City, the maximum daily supply (under peak day conditions) for Schertz from SSLGC is approximately 6,800 gpm. · Schertz Wells - There are two Schertz wells which can supply up to 1,800 gpm each. The wells supply water directly to the Nacogdoches EST under peak day conditions. Table 10 summarizes the system’s maximum supply which meets the minimum required capacity for existing conditions. Table 10: Well Capacities The City of Schertz provides water to two wholesale customers, the City of Cibolo and the City of Selma. The wholesale contracts with Cibolo and Selma do not specify maximum daily commitments. · Cibolo - from their wholesale water contracts with the City of Cibolo, the City of Schertz is to supply a combined total of 750 acre-feet of potable water per year, this includes 350 acre- feet of potable water per year designated to the Keli Heights Subdivision. 750 acre-feet per year is approximately 465 gpm. · Selma - from their wholesale water contract with the City of Selma, the City of Schertz is to supply a total of 800 acre-feet of potable water per year. 800 acre-feet per year is approximately 496 gpm. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 24 Table 11 summarizes contracted commitments to wholesale customers. Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments Under peak day conditions, the existing water system’s current available supply of 10,400 gpm (from Table 10) cannot meet the minimum required supply to the City (9,860 gpm) and its wholesale customers (961 gpm, from Table 11) which totals 10,821 gpm. 3.1.2.3 Total Storage Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must have a total storage capacity of at least 200 gallons per connection.” The minimum required storage capacity, at 200 gallons per connection, for the existing water system is 3,286,800 gallons. There are eight storage tanks within the existing water system: four elevated storage tanks and four ground storage tanks. The combined total capacity of the storage tanks is 8,500,000 gallons, meeting the minimum storage capacity requirement. Table 12 summarizes storage tank capacities. Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.4 Elevated Storage Tank Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must meet the following requirements: Have an elevated storage tank capacity of 100 gallons per connection or a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection. An elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection is required for systems with more than 2,500 connections.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required EST capacity, at 100 gallons per connection, is 1,643,400 gallons. There are four ESTs within 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 25 the existing water system with a combined storage capacity of 4,000,000 gallons, meeting the minimum required EST capacity. Table 13 summarizes the existing water system elevated storage tank maximum capacities. Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.5 Pumping Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For systems which provide an elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, two service pumps with a minimum combined capacity of 0.6 gpm per connection are required at each pump station or pressure plane. If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is 3,286,800 gallons. Schertz currently has 4,000,000 gallons of elevated storage within their system. Therefore, the minimum pumping capacity for the City is 0.6 gpm per connection based on the requirements. The minimum required combined pumping capacity for the existing water system, at 0.6 gpm per connection, is 9,860 gpm. There are four pump stations within the existing water system housing a total of 13 pumps. Table 14 summarizes the capacities of the 13 existing water system pumps. The maximum total pumping capacity of the pumps is 23,600 gpm, meeting the minimum required capacity. The firm pump capacity (with the largest pump out of service is 20,800 gpm which also meets the minimum capacity. Table 14: Pump Capacities 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 26 3.1.2.6 System Minimum Pressures TAC 290.44.d “… capable of providing a minimum pressure of at least 35-psi at all points within the distribution network” In coordination with the City, LAN made assumptions about the existing water system for the hydraulic model where data was limited. While the model indicates operations concerns in the water system, these should be field verified by the City. The existing system under peak day and average day conditions was evaluated in the model using a 24-hour EPS to observe system wide minimum pressures. The TCEQ required minimum pressure of 35-psi at all points within the distribution network applies to normal operating conditions (e.g. no fire flow or line breaks) and is used as the benchmark for assessing the observed pressures for peak day and average day conditions in the existing system model. Average Day Conditions Without detailed pressure readings across the service area, the existing system model can be used to approximate a system pressure. While the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi, the results from the existing system model indicate pressure concerns under average day conditions in some areas. Observed minimum system pressures under average day conditions are summarized in Table 15. Figure 7 illustrates the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under average day conditions. Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 27 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures While minimum pressures in the existing system model indicated flows approximately 1-psi below the minimum required pressure of 35-psi at the intersection of Ware Seguin Road and the Ware Seguin Plant and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST, the pressures were significantly above the emergency operations threshold of 20-psi. This is a small deviation and indicates additional data collection, and analysis should be conducted by the City for verification of operations. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 28 The Ware Seguin Plant low pressures occur near the end of the model day and could be related to the storage/capacity issues referenced above. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. Peak Day Conditions Under peak day conditions, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi. This is illustrated on Figure 8 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing water system under peak day demand conditions. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed, along Ware Seguin Road and near the I-35 EST at Pecan Street. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. These locations are noted on Figure 8. Pressures were below the required 35-psi minimum, as well as the below the 20-psi emergency operations minimum along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. There are two factors driving the low pressure at this location, first its elevation is higher than the surrounding area by approximately 40-ft and, second, at 5 am when this low pressure occurs, the peak residential demand overlaps with irrigation demand from the HOA meters in the residential subdivisions immediately to the northeast and southwest. These low-pressure results indicate additional data collection, and analysis should be prioritized. Observed minimum system pressures under peak day conditions are summarized in Table 16. Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 29 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures 3.1.2.7 Fire Flows TAC 290.44.d. “When the system is intended to provide firefighting capability, it must also be designed to maintain a minimum pressure of 20-psi under combined fire and drinking water flow conditions.” For conservative modeling purposes, the existing water system was evaluated for three separate peak day plus fire flow scenarios (one in each pressure plane) to observe any potential interaction between the pressure planes. Fire Flow simulations were run at a commercial meter selected to provide “worst case” scenarios within each pressure plane. These specific locations for fire flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 30 in each pressure plane were selected because its commercial meter was at a higher elevation than other commercial meter locations in the pressure plane and were not close in proximity to an elevated storage tank or pump station. A representative Fire Flow demand of 3,500 gpm was placed at the selected meter during the corresponding simulation. Simulating worst case scenario fire flow conditions for each pressure plane provides an analysis of how the pressure planes interact while under critical conditions. The selected locations for each simulation are shown in Figure 9. Fire Flow simulations were set to occur from 7 am to 10 am under peak day conditions. This creates a “worst case” condition where the fire flow occurs during peak hour. Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 31 The Scenic Hills Fire Flow simulation was placed off I-35 at a commercial meter south of Baugh Lane. For the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road, surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant, and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST. These locations are noted on Figure 10 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 17. Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 32 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation The I-35 Fire Flow simulation was placed near the intersection of I-35 and FM 3009 at a commercial meter adjacent to Corridor Parkway. For the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. These locations are noted on Figure 11 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 18. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 33 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 34 The Live Oak Fire Flow simulation was located at a commercial meter approximately 0.6 miles west of the intersection of I-10 and FM 1518. For the Live Oak Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the I-35 and Scenic Hills Pressure Planes do meet the minimum 20-psi. However, the observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi across the majority of the Live Oak Pressure Plane south of FM 78. These locations are noted on Figure 12 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. These results indicate additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 19. Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 35 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation 3.1.3 Recommendations For the TAC Criteria where the model did not demonstrate that the minimum criteria was met, it is recommended that the City take steps to verify the behavior of the water system in the field. This section presents the steps the City can take to verify the model observations. 3.1.3.1 System Storage & Supply Although the system meets the minimum total storage capacity, the existing system model results indicated that the system cannot supply peak day demands for an extended period of time. It is recommended that the City perform pressure and flow monitoring at all pump stations and ESTs concurrently for two weeks during a peak day period (e.g., Mid-August) to verify behavior of the water system under these conditions. It is LAN’s understanding that a second supply connection from the SSLGC will be connected to the proposed Corbett EST (located near the east dead end of Ray Corbett Dr.). This additional supply location and EST will be assessed in the Future System Evaluation effort. These future 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 36 conditions results will be considered when developing the final recommendations for storage and supply of the City’s water system. 3.1.3.2 System Minimum Pressure Requirements Because pressures below the minimum requirements for the average day, peak day, and peak day plus fire scenarios were observed in the existing system model, it is recommended that the City perform pressure monitoring at the locations were these low pressures were observed at the same time that the peak day period flow and pressure monitoring at the pump stations and ESTs is being performed. It is recommended that the data recording equipment used be set to record pressure and flow readings at least every 15-minutes. 3.1.4 Summary The results from this existing system evaluation were used to develop preliminary infrastructure and operational recommendations for near-term and future system improvements. These recommendations, in conjunction with currently planned improvements, are assessed in the future system evaluation and used in the development of the Capital Improvements Plan. Preliminary recommendation alternatives under consideration are (but not limited to): · Increase in water supply · Increased pumping capacity · Increased storage capacity · Changes to pump operating pressure controls or schedules 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP The following information, criteria, and constraints were used to identify and develop proposed water system improvement projects. · City direction for projects already in planning, design, and construction · Minimum pipe size of 8-inches · Minimum normal system pressure of 45 psi 3.2.1 Near Term System Evaluation Before proceeding to model future scenarios, the system was analyzed to identify improvements needed to solve present day system issues. This analysis is referred to as ‘near-term’ system improvements and accounts for projects which are currently under design or construction and other projects identified in the analysis to resolve existing system deficiencies. The near-term system water model was developed based on the existing conditions model previously developed. Projects which are currently in various stages of design and construction were provided by the City and implemented into the model. After implementing City-identified projects the model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 37 3.2.1.1 Fire Flow Analysis Fire flow analysis of the existing system was performed in the development of the “Existing Water System Model Evaluation” memo published January 2021. Projects to resolve fire flow deficiencies in the existing system were identified in the near-term system evaluation and are included in the recommended Near-Term CIPs and proposed Pipe Replacement Program. 3.2.1.2 Pipe Replacement Program In addition to the recommended CIPs identified in the model evaluation, the City also desires to replace undersized (≤6”) and asbestos-cement (AC) distribution pipes within their system. The undersized distribution pipes are unable to provide fire flow and reduce the system capacity. Undersized pipes are recommended to be upsized to 8” PVC, and the AC pipes greater than or equal to 8” should be replaced with PVC pipes of the same size. Based on the pipe attributes in the hydraulic model, there are approximately 280,460 LF of AC pipe in the system and an additional 175,380 LF of undersized pipe in the system. These pipe replacement programs can be established with a goal to replace a certain amount of pipe per year. A 20-year program would include an average replacement rate of 22,800 LF per year. 3.2.1.3 Near Term CIP Projects Recommended near-term CIPs are listed in Table 20 and illustrated in Appendix 11. Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes System Improvement Projects NT-W1 Bubbling Springs 6” WL Replacement City identified maintenance project. NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), currently underway. NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. NT-W4 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Currently underway. NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab Complete. NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt Currently in design. NT-W7 Graytown to Pfeil Currently underway. NT-W8 FM 78 Water Line Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W9 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W10 Robinhood Way WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. NT-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 38 3.2.2 2030 System Evaluation The 2030 planning scenario is the first future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2030 model, the near-term model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2030 project land use. The City identified projects that were not needed until 2030 were implemented in the 2030 model and additional projects were identified to meet the 2030 system needs. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2030 projects implemented. 3.2.2.1 TCEQ capacity Analysis An evaluation of the City’s system was performed to determine if the system met the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ’s) minimum pumpage and storage requirements as outlined in Chapter §290.45 of the Texas Administrative Code. A summary of the applicable TCEQ minimum requirements is included below. TCEQ’s requirements are based on the raw number of connections, which have been approximated based on the number of connections in the model and City GIS data. TCEQ Minimum Requirements: 1. Well Pump Capacity: Two (2) or more wells having a total capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection. 2. Elevated Storage Capacity: Elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection. 3. Elevated Storage Credit: If elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is provided, reduced service pumping requirements can be applied as discussed below. 4. Pressure Tank Capacity: For future systems, if elevated storage is not provided, a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection is required. 5. Total Storage Capacity (elevated and ground storage): Total storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, inclusive of the 100-gallon minimum requirement listed above. 6. Service Pump Capacity: 6.1 A minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 2.0 GPM per connection, except for systems meeting one of the two requirements below. 6.1.1 For systems that meet the elevated storage credit requirement listed above, a minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection are required for each pump station or pressure plane. 6.1.2 If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required. The City’s existing system is divided into three (3) pressure planes – IH-35, Scenic Hills, and Live Oak. For the TCEQ Capacity Analysis, IH-35 and Scenic Hills pressure planes have been grouped together as they receive water from the same supply point. The 2030 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 21, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 22 and Table 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 39 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Existing Number of Connections 2030 Number of Connections IH-35 + Scenic Hills 9,913 11,966 Live Oak 6,118 7,385 Total 16,031 19,351 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 22 and Table 23 below assume that all near-term and recommended 2030 projects are complete and in-service. Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 8,100 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,196,000 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 13,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 11,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 8,855 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 738,500 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 12,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.2.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2030 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. The Corbett EST is filled by the new Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 40 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST drains slightly during peak demand times of the day but is able to recover. Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 41 The Nacogdoches EST level fluctuates throughout the peak day simulation but is able to be filled with the well. Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST drains during the peak day simulation but is able to recover to initial levels around hour 27. Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 42 The Northcliffe EST levels fluctuate frequently throughout the day but can easily recover to initial levels. Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels 3.2.2.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2030 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes were selected at extremities of the system to represent the most conservative locations to achieve acceptable fire flow. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 12. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2030 system improvements. 3.2.2.4 2030 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2030 are listed in Table 24 and illustrated in Appendix 13. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 43 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2030-W1 New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF) Serves new service area. 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12” WL Improvements Serves new service area. 2030-W3 8” WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Serves new service area. 2030-W4 Trainer Hale Rd 2” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. 2030-W5 Boenig Dr S 6” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. 2030-W8 IH-10 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area. System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. 2030-W10 River Rd 6” WL Replacement Removes system bottleneck. 2030-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. 2030-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 3.2.2.5 2030 SSLGC Supply Need As part of the modeling effort, the water supply needed from the Schertz-Seguin Limited Government Corporation (SSLGC) was evaluated. Schertz is currently contracted for 5,801 gpm (8,351 acre-ft per year). An additional 3,799 gpm SSLGC water supply capacity for a total of 9,600 gpm is recommended to meet the 2030 projected system demands. 3.2.3 2050 System Evaluation The 2050 planning scenario is the final future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2050 model, the 2030 model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2050 project land use. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2050 projects implemented. 3.2.3.1 TCEQ Capacity Analysis The TCEQ capacity analysis was also performed for supply, storage, and pumping with recommended improvements through 2050 implemented. The 2050 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 44 current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 25, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 26 and Table 27. Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Number of Connections for TCEQ Capacity Analysis IH-35 + Scenic Hills 16,846 Live Oak 10,397 Total 27,243 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 26 and Table 27 assume that all near-term, recommended 2030, and recommended 2050 projects are complete and in-service. Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,684,600 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 16,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 9,400 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,039,700 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 13,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.3.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2050 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 45 The Corbett EST is filled by the Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST levels drop in the peak demand times but are able to recover to initial levels within 24 hours. Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels The Nacogdoches EST levels fluctuate throughout the peak day simulation but are able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 46 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST is fed by the new 2050 IH-35 pump station and is easily able to fill based on running the proposed pump station. Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls The Northcliffe EST level fluctuates frequently throughout the peak day simulation but is able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 47 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels 3.2.3.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2050 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes included all nodes included in the 2030 analysis with some additional nodes extending into new 2050 service areas. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 14. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2050 system improvements. 3.2.3.4 2050 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2050 are listed in Table 28 and illustrated in Appendix 15. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 48 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system 2050-W2 FM 2252 8” WL Improvements Serves new service area 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area 2050-W4 Beck St 6” WL Replacement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W7 IH-10 and FM 1518 8” Improvements Needed to meet growth in area System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8” WL Replacement Needed for fire flow 3.2.3.5 2050 SSLGC Supply Needs Additional water supply from SSLGC is needed for the 2050 planning scenario. A total of 16,965 gpm of SSLGC supply is recommended to meet the 2050 projected system demands. 3.2.4 Summary The recommendations provided in this section were a collaborative effort with City staff and LAN to identify and model water system improvements to resolve near-term problems as well as meet the needs due to projected growth for the 2030 and 2050 planning periods. The water model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and can be adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 49 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP A wastewater system model was created in Bentley Sewer GEMS by LAN using data provided by the City. LAN presented the model to the City during a meeting on September 10, 2020. Updates to the model were then made according to the comments from the City. To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a reliable hydraulic model is needed. Model reliability is developed through hydraulic model calibration. Model calibration and simulation were performed using Sewer GEMS software which provided the tool and results necessary to assess the existing wastewater system under dry and wet weather conditions. The purpose of this technical memorandum (TM) is to summarize the calibration results for Average Day Flow (ADF) dry and wet weather conditions and to identify areas with hydraulic deficiencies in the City’s wastewater system based on a design storm. 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System 4.1.1 Flow Monitoring and Rain Gauges RJN Group installed 15 flow monitors in the City’s wastewater system across a variety of gravity main sizes. The flow monitors recorded data in 5-minute increments from April through June of 2020. The goal of the flow monitoring was to record dry weather flows as well as wet weather flows during rain events. RJN also installed six rain gauges in concert with the flow monitors to collect the rainfall data. The rain gauges were located to capture spatial variation of rainfall across the sewer system in 5-minute increments. Appendix 16 illustrates placement of rain gauges, where the 15 flow monitors were placed in the City’s sewer system and the boundaries of the corresponding sewer shed basin for each flow monitor. A schematic network of the flow monitor basins within the City’s sewer system is provided in Figure 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 50 Figure 23: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System 4.1.2 Dry Weather Calibration Criteria The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for dry weather calibration effort: · The modeled and monitored flow hydrographs should follow closely in terms of the shape and magnitude. · Timing of the high and low flows from the model and the flow monitors should be within 1- hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 10% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 10% range. 4.1.3 Dry Weather Flows (DWF) Developing base sanitary sewer loads for each sewershed basin is an iterative process. First, preliminary base loads were estimated by applying Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) population and employment data to each sewershed basin. A unique gallon per capita per day (gpcd) was estimated for each basin using the TAZ data and the flow monitoring data. These gpcds were then used to calculate the preliminary base load for each basin which was input into the model. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 51 Second, Tuesday May 26, 2020, was chosen as the dry weather calibration day due to the lack of any rainstorms on that day and the consistency in the monitoring across all 15 of the flow monitors within this 24-hour period. Next, a 24-hour Extended Period Simulation was run in the model and the results were compared to the flow monitoring data collected on the chosen dry weather calibration day. Based on this comparison, adjustments were made to the base load and diurnal pattern for each basin until the model results met the dry weather calibration criteria. Some adjustments to the preliminary sanitary loading were significant because the TAZ polygon data which were used to calculate the initial base load estimates are on a large scale. These adjustments were needed to represent the density of load distribution more accurately in the system. To further refine the sanitary loading in the system, point loads were applied to represent significantly large contributors such as apartment buildings or schools. A summary of the adjustments made per basin is provided in Table 29. Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary Figure 24 provides an example of a diurnal pattern developed for flow monitor basin FM-12. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 52 Figure 24: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern 4.1.4 Dry Weather Calibration Results The dry weather calibration was an iterative process involving adjustment of base sanitary loadings, diurnal curves, and point loads. Eventually, the adjustment process produced results that fit the calibration criteria. Figure 25 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled dry weather flows (FM-06). Graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are provided in Appendix 17. Figure 25: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 53 Table 30 shows the dry weather calibration results for the 15 flow monitoring locations. Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results As shown in Table 30, dry weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There are few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the criteria described above. Those basins are FM-03, FM-08, FM-10, and FM-11. All these basins have lift stations upstream of the monitoring locations which directly affect the model results. For basins FM-03 and FM-11, assumptions were made for the lift stations within the basin. Those assumptions were provided in the Existing Wastewater System TM (September 4, 2020). The FM-08 basin has eight lift stations. Without accurate pump curves and pump operations for all the lift stations in these basins, the results are satisfactory with the current level of accuracy achieved. In addition to the City-owned lift stations in basins FM-03 and FM-11, there are several privately owned lift stations that contribute to the overall sanitary loadings in the wastewater system. Pump curves for these smaller lift stations were not available, therefore pump curves were assumed for modeling purposes. The following lift stations are privately owned: Aquatic Center, FedEx, & Fire Station 3. For Basins FM-06 and FM-10, calibration was performed by assuming sanitary loadings for business and institutes in the basins (see Table 29 for the specific adjustments performed on each basin). 4.1.5 Wet Weather Calibration Criteria Wet weather calibration is necessary along with dry weather calibration to adequately model the effects that rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDII) have on the wastewater system. The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for WW calibration effort: · The hydrographs (modeled and observed) should closely reflect the same shape and magnitude. · The peaks and troughs of the hydrographs (modeled and observed) should be within one hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 15% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 15% range. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 54 4.1.6 Calibration Rainfall Event Six rain gauges were installed for the duration of the flow monitoring period to record rainfall events. Review of the observed rainfall and flow monitoring data identified a distinct rain event with reliable flow monitoring data that could be used for wet weather calibration. Table 31 summarizes the rainfall event identified for wet weather calibration at the six rain gauges. Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties Because there were only six rain gauges for the 15 flowmeter basins, it was necessary to make assumptions as to which rain data to associate with each basin. Table 32 presents those assumptions. Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions In addition to the basins listed above, the SARA and Hallie’s Cove Outfalls were associated with RG-01 data because no rain monitoring took place in those areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 55 4.1.7 Wet Weather Flow Characterization To calibrate for wet weather, the RTK Method was used in the model to predict the sanitary sewer system’s short-, medium-, and long-term response to a rainfall event. These parameters, developed using the flow monitoring data recorded in the field, are applied in the model so that results are representative of field conditions. The R, T, and K parameters are defined as follows: · R - fraction of precipitation that enters the sanitary sewer system · T - the time to peak of the hydrograph · K - the ratio of the ‘time of recession’ to the ‘time to peak’. How these parameters are used to generate the short-, medium-, and long-term unit hydrographs used in the model is illustrated in Figure 26. Figure 26: RTK Method Parameters The RTK method creates a triangle from the three values with a separate triangle made for each type of response (short, medium, and long). The final hydrograph is represented by the addition of the three triangles. Therefore, this method uses a total of 9 parameters (3 RTK parameter sets for each of the 3 triangles that represent the short, medium, and long-term responses.) LAN assigned a RTK hydrograph to each of the flow monitoring locations that would represent the response to the rainfall. Then, iterative model runs were used to adjust the RTK parameters until the model outputs and flow monitoring were within tolerances specified by the calibration criteria. A 30- hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario for wet weather calibration was created for the following period: Sunday May 24, 2020, through 6:00 AM on Monday May 25, 2020. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 56 There can be some variations between a sewer’s diurnal pattern on a weekday vs. a weekend. Because the rainfall event selected to use for wet weather calibration occurred on a weekend, the flow monitoring data was used to develop an adjusted diurnal pattern that represents the behavior of system base flows on a weekend. The weekend diurnal pattern was applied to the base sanitary loads in the system for the wet weather calibration. Accurately representing the pattern of the base flow will prevent the over or under estimation of the system’s response to rainfall with the development of the RTK parameters. 4.1.8 Wet Weather Calibration Results Using the data from the six rain gauges, the flow monitoring data and the RTK hydrographs, the model was calibrated. With the rain data collected and assigned to the separate flow monitor basins, the RTK hydrograph values were estimated for each basin. Table 33 lists calibrated RTK parameters for wet weather calibration for each flowmeter basin. Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters Figure 27 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled wet weather flows (FM-06). Wet weather graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are shown in Appendix 17. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 57 Figure 27: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot Table 34 documents the results of the wet weather calibration for all 15 flowmeter basins. Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results Wet weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There were few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the wet weather calibration criteria. Those basins were FM-04, FM-11, and FM-15. Like dry weather calibration, inaccurate pump curves and pump operation for lift stations within these basins could adversely affect the model 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 58 results. In addition, FM-11 flowmeter data seems to be erroneous at some time periods. Looking at the FM-04 graph in Appendix 18 and comparing its peak flow with upstream contributing flowmeter basins (FM-12 and FM-13), the observed FM-04 peak flow (5 mgd) is lower than summation of peak flows at FM-12 (5.4 mgd) and FM-13 (0.75 mgd). In fact, summing up the observed peak flows at FM-12 and FM-13 (6.15 mgd) provides a peak flow closer to the modeled peak flow at FM-04. This discrepancy might be related to erroneous flowmeter data at FM 04 or there might be an unknown unmetered interconnect with leaving flows to another basin from FM 04. For FM-15, the observed flows at 5/25/20 from 0:00 to 6:00 AM seems too high, as the rain started to diminish around that time based on the recording at RG-03, which indicates flows cannot be as high as the FM-15 showed during that time period. 4.1.9 RDII Assessment The flow monitoring data for the calibration days were used to assess the sewer system susceptibility and response to RDII. Table 35 shows the wet weather peaking factors (peak WWF/average DWF). Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins Only FM-06 and FM-12 had substantial RDII response. The rest of the basins did not have significant RDII response based on the flow monitoring data for the calibration days. 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation 4.2.1 Design Storm To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the calibrated model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.3-inches. The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution type III. Figure 28 shows the hyetograph of the design storm used for this evaluation. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 59 Figure 28: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm 4.2.2 System Evaluation The 5-year 24-hour design storm shown in Figure 28 was then applied to the City’s calibrated model for system evaluation. The following criteria were used to evaluate the existing wastewater system and identify potential problem areas: · Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) at manholes · Surcharged gravity mains The majority of the SSOs and surcharged lines in the system are located on the 10-inch CCMA line which parallels Roy Richard Dr. and the 30-inch CCMA line which follows the drainage channel from I- 35 down to the outfall at Cibolo Creek. Some surcharging and SSOs were also predicted by the model in the Northcliffe area around the I-35 corridor. The extents and locations of these SSOs and surcharged lines for the existing system evaluation results are presented in Appendix 19. 4.2.3 Summary Using data collected from the flow monitors and rain gauges, the wastewater hydraulic model for the City of Schertz was calibrated for both dry and wet weather flows. The model calibration reached the required level of accuracy for both calibration scenarios. Further accuracy may be achieved with the provision of further data such as pump curve information and detailed customer sanitary sewer flow information for certain areas. Following the model calibration, the City’s wastewater system was evaluated based on a 5-year, 24-hour design storm for wet weather condition. The total number of SSOs found to be 21 (7 of these 21 SSOs are on lines owned by the City) which is less than 1 percent of the total number of manholes. The total length of sewer found to be capacity deficient (maximum flow greater than pipe full capacity) 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 60 was approximately 52,000-feet (of which approximately 22,500-feet is owned by the City). This is about 5.7 percent of the total existing conduits length. The next phase of the modeling process is a future model evaluation. This phase of the modeling includes running the model with population predictions based on the future TAZ population data and recommendations for future system improvements as part of the City’s capital improvement plan. This evaluation will be described in the next section. 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs The City contracted LAN to conduct the wastewater system improvement analysis and update the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). This effort requires developing a future sanitary sewer representation model of the City’s collection system based on anticipated growth areas. Future Average Dry Weather Flow and Wet Weather Flow scenarios for 10-year and 30-year were developed. The purpose of this section is to summarize the results of the future wastewater system improvement analysis and list the 10-year and 30-year wastewater system CIPs. 4.3.1 Future Modeling Methodology The future scenarios assumed increases in residential and commercial/industrial developments based on information about planned development projects provided by the City. LAN used the City’s calibrated model for dry and wet weather scenarios as the base for this analysis and allocated wastewater sanitary loads to the wastewater hydraulic model using the projected water demands developed for the Schertz water hydraulic model. To generate the sanitary loads, a return rate of 70% was applied to water demand at each node. Then GIS tools were used to determine which demand nodes fell within the existing wastewater service areas. If a demand node fell outside an existing service area, new interceptors were recommended to connect them to an existing or future wastewater treatment plant. Using Thiessen polygon and Loadbuilder tools from SewerGEMS, the sanitary loads were allocated to the nearest manholes in the model. Table 36 presents the existing and future average dry weather flow projections. Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections Future scenarios were created in the model for the 10-year (2030) and 30-year (2050) increments, along with their respective sanitary loads to simulate the future growth anticipated by the City. Diurnal curves were developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model and then used to distribute the future average dry weather sanitary flows over 24 hours. Analysis began on the 2030 scenario to evaluate the system and to find where the required improvements to the existing system are, besides any future projects to accommodate the new growth areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 61 4.3.1.1 Hydraulic Criteria Hydraulic criteria used for this analysis include capacity deficiency and design criteria. Capacity deficiency criteria identify the need to replace an existing facility, while design criteria determine the size of new facilities. These criteria were established based on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and engineering best practices. Table 37 lists a summary of capacity deficiency criteria used for the existing system in this analysis. Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities Table 38 lists a summary of design criteria used for new sewer facilities. Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities 4.3.1.2 Design Storm For wet weather scenarios, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.4 inches. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 62 The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution Type III, representing the rainfall temporal distribution type happening in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coastal areas (TR-55 Cover (hydrocad.net)). The same hyetograph in section 4.2.1 is applicable to this evaluation. 4.3.1.3 Inflow & Infiltration Assumption The RTK hydrographs developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model were used to represent the inflow and infiltration (I&I) for the existing infrastructure and service areas. In addition to utilizing diurnal curves to incorporate peak dry flow, a peaking factor of 4 was applied to represent the effect of I&I for future loadings outside the existing service areas where there is no historical data is available. The assumption was that new infrastructure would meet current standards and would therefore be less susceptible to I&I. 4.3.2 Future System Analysis & CIPs The following scenarios were created for future system analysis: · Dry Weather 2030 Scenario · Wet Weather 2030 Scenario · Dry Weather 2050 Scenario · Wet Weather 2050 Scenario Table 39 shows a breakdown of the dry weather flow projections for each planning period by the system outfalls. Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls 4.3.2.1 Near Term CIP Projects The near-term project list for Schertz provided by the City was incorporated into the existing system to create future scenarios along with future sanitary loadings. Each scenario includes all the currently planned projects that will be in place by that planning year. Table 40 lists currently planned projects (near-term) provided by the City (shown in Appendix 20). 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 63 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary It is important to note that the pipe size was undetermined for the Cibolo West Main Trunkline. Based on the available information and hydraulic model results, LAN recommends an 18-inch pipe size for the above project. In addition, LAN received the 2021 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan for the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. The CCMA’s CIP projects affecting the Schertz sewer system were also incorporated into each scenario based on the planning year. 4.3.2.2 2030 CIP Growth Projects The 2030 scenario included the currently planned CIP projects for the City. To serve the new development areas happening between 2022 to 2030, LAN proposes new growth CIPs as listed in Table 41. The alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment and are to be considered as preliminary. Final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 was used to size the new facilities. For modeling purposes, slopes for new growth CIP lines were assumed based on the TCEQ minimum slope requirement. At some locations, higher than minimum slopes were considered to prevent extra excavation. Appendix 21 shows the location of the 2030 growth CIPs. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 64 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary 4.3.2.3 Model Results Under 2030 Flows After bringing in the 2030 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2030 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 22. The results show 98% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5. It also shows gravity lines parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and upstream of the Friesenhahn lift station having maximum d/D of greater than 0.75, and gravity lines right upstream of Riata lift station having a maximum d/D between 0.5 and 0.75. This indicates these gravity lines (i.e., with maximum d/D greater than 0.5) may not accommodate the additional capacity needs from future flows and could require upsizing. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2030 wet weather flow (average dry weather plus 5-year, 24-hour I&I) was used to determine areas that are susceptible to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Note that the model shows SSOs at locations where the maximum hydraulic grade (HGL) rises above manhole rim elevations. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 23. The results show a total of 11 manholes within the existing service areas are overflowing. Per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37, the sewer system is capacity deficient at the locations where SSOs are reported by the model. 4.3.2.4 2030 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN proposes several system improvement projects listed in Table 42 to address the SSOs. In addition, Belmont Park lift station is set to go offline by 2030 per City staff. Therefore, that lift station was set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass it. LAN also determined that the Northcliffe (Town Creek) lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 4,800 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Appendix 24 shows the location of the 2030 system improvement projects. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 65 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.5 2030 CCMA Recommended Projects The results of the 2030 wet weather flow scenario showed some of the CCMA’s gravity lines have capacity issues that would affect the City’s sewer system performance. LAN recommends the following system improvement projects related to CCMA’s gravity lines (listed in Table 43 and shown in Appendix 24). Although originally listed as 2041 CCMA CIPs (Projects 2030 C-1 & 2030 C-2) and as Buildout CCMA CIP (Project 2030 C-4) in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. in 2021, LAN currently recommends these CIP projects for inclusion in the 2030 planning period. Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.6 2050 CIP Growth Projects To develop the 2050 scenario, the system changes proposed for 2030 were used as the base. To serve the new development areas happening between 2030 to 2050, LAN proposes new growth CIPs listed in Table 44 and shown in Appendix 25. Similar to 2030 growth CIPs, the alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment, and final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 were used to size the new facilities. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 66 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary In addition, Schertz Pkwy, Cover’s Cove, and Park lift stations are set to go offline by 2050 per City staff. Therefore, Cover’s Cove and Park lift stations were set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass that lift station. Schertz Pkwy lift station will also go offline, and its flow will be conveyed to a new CCMA line which will be built by 2050. However, due to the unavailability of information about the new CCMA’s line, the Schertz Pkwy lift station was set inactive in the model and its flow was directed to a new outfall. 4.3.2.7 Model Results Under 2050 Flows After bringing in the 2050 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2050 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 26. Similar to 2030 scenario results, 97% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5, and only 3% of gravity lines have a maximum (d/D) of greater than 0.5. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2050 wet weather flow was used to determine areas that are susceptible to overflowing. The modeling results show no manholes are overflowing indicating the 2050 system has sufficient capacity per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37. Therefore, LAN does not recommend any capacity-related CIPs for the 2050 planning period. 4.3.2.8 2050 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN determined that Cypress Point lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 1,250 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Table 45 describes 2050 system improvement projects shown in Appendix 27. Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 67 4.3.2.9 Pumping Capacity Evaluation For pumping capacity evaluation, the existing firm capacity (i.e., capacity with the largest pump off) will be compared to peak wet weather flow at each lift station. Per TCEQ requirements, peak wet weather flow should not exceed firm capacity. Table 46 shows the results of the pumping capacity evaluation. Note that this analysis has only been conducted for public existing lift stations; private lift stations have been excluded from the study. Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation As seen in Table 46, except for Cypress Point and Northcliffe lift stations, all other existing lift stations have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since their peak flows are less than lift station firm capacities. Per TCEQ requirement, Northcliffe lift station requires an upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 4,485 gpm, and Cypress Point lift 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 68 station needs an upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 1,233 gpm. Northcliffe lift station upgrade should be done as early as 2030, but Cypress Point’s upgrade can wait until 2050. 4.3.2.10 Force Main Capacity Evaluation As listed in Table 37, the hydraulic criterion for force mains is not to exceed a maximum velocity of 8 ft/s under the peak wet weather flow (average dry plus 5-year, 24-hour storm flow). Higher than 8 ft/s velocities correspond to high head loss in force mains which over time scour force main interior causing premature structural failure. Table 47 shows the results of the force main capacity evaluation. Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation All existing force mains have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since they have velocities below the maximum criterion (8 ft/s). 4.3.3 Summary The recommendations outlined in this section were a joint effort with City personnel and LAN to identify improvements needed for the City’s sewer system. These improvements aim to address capacity limitations and accommodate the anticipated growth in the planning years of 2030 and 2050. The sewer collection system model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 69 5. IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Living Unit Equivalent Living unit or service unit equivalents (LUEs) are “a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years”. Standard engineering practices equate one water LUE to a single, typical residential water meter’s usage. The wastewater LUE is assumed to be 70% of a single residential water meter’s usage to account for irrigation, evaporation, and other water losses associated with the wastewater system. An analysis of the existing water and wastewater system hydraulic models determined that the water LUE is 0.17 gpm, and the wastewater LUE is 0.119 gpm. From the hydraulic water model, the total existing and future 2030 system flows for residential and “other” uses were calculated. These total flow values were divided by their respective LUE to determine the growth in each system. “Growth” in this case refers to the difference between the 2030 value and the existing value. It is important to note that the CCN boundaries for the Schertz water and wastewater system are not the same, so the growth in the respective systems is slightly different. Table 48 & Table 49 below show the process of determining the growth in LUEs for the water and wastewater systems. Table 48: Calculations for Growth in Water LUEs Growth in Water LUEs Scenario Total Flow (gpm) Living Unit Equivalent (gpm) # of LUEs Existing Residential 2,225 0.17 13,089 Existing Other 2,485 14,620 2030 Residential 3,372 19,838 2030 Other 2,545 14,971 Growth In Residential: 6,749 Growth In Other: 351 Table 49: Calculations for Growth in Wastewater LUEs Growth in Wastewater LUEs Scenario Total Flow (gpm) Living Unit Equivalent (gpm) # of LUEs Existing Business 113 0.119 951 Existing Other 3,483 29,269 2030 Business 123 1,034 2030 Other 4,332 36,403 Growth in Business: 82 Growth In Other: 7,134 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 70 5.2 Cost Data The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) provides a cost estimate classification system that includes five classes of estimates. Each class has specific characteristics that indicate the level of detail of the cost estimate, with 5 being the least defined and 1 being the most defined. These classes are commonly used industry standards for engineers, contractors, and estimators. The accuracy range of an estimate narrows (becomes more accurate) as the project scope becomes more defined as shown in Figure 29 from AACE below. In the same figure, the approximate overlap of classes is shown as well in relation to the level of scope definition. Figure 29: AACE Cost Estimate Clases For this analysis, Class 4 estimating was identified as the appropriate, industry standard, estimation class. According to AACE, Class 4 estimates “are prepared for a number of purposes, such as but not limited to, detailed strategic planning, business development, project screening at more developed stages, alternative scheme analysis, confirmation of economic and/or technical feasibility and preliminary budget approval or approval to proceed to next stage”. The developed cost estimates are preliminary and rely on available information and standard preliminary engineering methods for Class 4 cost estimation. These methods were consistently applied to similar project components (e.g., pipelines, pump stations, lift stations, etc.) to facilitate comparison between different project alternatives. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 71 Cost data for the proposed CIP projects was obtained from the following sources: · TxDOT Online Bid Reports (past year) · RS Means Database · Cost Estimates from Past & Current City Projects · Cost Estimates from Past & Current LAN Projects Item costs were averaged from these sources and an inflation rate was applied to the costs for 2030 and 2050, which is discussed in detail in the following section. A 30% contingency factor was applied across all cost estimates, which reflects the range of accuracy of a Class 4 estimate. For cost components that were highly variable and unpredictable at this stage of analysis, such as developing construction documents and construction management, estimates were derived from previous project experience and included as a percentage of the total construction costs. 5.3 Inflation Rate Calculation In order to accurately capture construction prices for the future scenarios, an average yearly inflation rate was calculated and applied to the 2030 & 2050 project cost estimates. Three sources were consulted for historical inflation indexes including RS Means, Mortenson Construction Cost Indexes, and Turner Building Cost Indexes. Varying time frames of inflation were provided by these sources, but the data was not normalized to ensure that a wide range of indexes were included in the yearly inflation rate calculation. Additionally, these indexes are the average of nationwide data. Table 50 below shows the varying time frames and their associated total and yearly inflation rates. The median yearly inflation rate of this data is 3.91%, and this value was applied to the line items in the 2030 and 2050 cost estimates. See Appendix 28 for inflation rate source data. Table 50: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate RS Means Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2024 128% 6.31% 2010 to 2024 169% 3.81% 2000 to 2024 251% 3.91% 1990 to 2024 309% 3.38% 1980 to 2024 454% 3.50% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 132% 9.65% 2010 to 2023 188% 5.93% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 117% 5.27% 2010 to 2023 172% 4.25% 2000 to 2023 231% 3.70% 1996 to 2024 272% 3.77% Average: 4.86% Median: 3.91% 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 72 5.4 Project Costs Eligibility Estimates of total construction cost for the proposed water and wastewater CIP projects were developed. However, TLGC Section 395 stipulates that only certain types of projects and only the portion of the project utilized during the 10-year planning period can be included in the impact fee eligible total. 5.4.1 Eligible Project Types There are defined items payable by the impact fee per TLGC Section 395, and these items are listed in Section 1 of this report. The proposed CIP projects were divided into “Growth” projects and “System Improvement” projects to assist in clearly identifying those projects that are eligible. Some of the projects only have a portion of the project costs listed as eligible because they serve both new growth and provide system improvements. Only the growth portions of those projects are eligible to be included in the total impact fee costs. The following types of projects are not eligible to be included in the total impact fee costs: · All 2050 Projects · Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority Projects (CCMA) In the tables below, the projects, costs and their impact fee eligible costs are shown for the Water CIP, Wastewater CIP, and the recommended CCMA System Improvement projects. Projects denoted by two asterisks indicate that only a portion of the project costs are impact fee eligible. See Appendix 29 for individual project cost estimates. 5.4.2 Project Utilization During 10-Year Planning Period This water and wastewater master plan includes three phases of projects: near term, 2030, and 2050. Only the projects within the 10-year planning period of 2020-2030 are eligible to be paid by impact fees in this analysis. TLGC also stipulates that only the portion of a project that is utilized during the 10- year period may be considered for impact fee eligibility. The utilization is determined by the following equation: % = 2030 − 2020 2050 There are some cases where proposed 2030 CIP projects utilize 100% of their build out capacity in 2030 and then in 2050 use less than the build out capacity. This occurs due to additional infrastructure being added in 2050 which takes on some of the capacity burden from those 2030 CIP projects. In these cases, the utilization is determined using the same equation as above, but with 2030 Peak Flow in the denominator: % ( ) = 2030 − 2020 2030 See Appendix 30 for utilization calculations. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 73 Table 51: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects NT-W1** Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 27% $206,715 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 0% $0 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 0% $0 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 0% $0 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 0% $0 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 0% $0 NT-W7** Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 69% $1,077,040 NT-W8** FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 22% $194,778 NT-W9** Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 0% $0 NT-W10** Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 0% $0 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $23,206,556 - $1,478,532 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Table 52: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 100% $4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 89% $1,272,934 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 97% $3,569,245 2030-W4** Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 93% $9,192,317 2030-W5** Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 69% $4,411,757 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 100% $32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 33% $1,737,667 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 100% $6,063,000 2030 Growth Subtotal: $69,503,000 - $63,109,920 System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 0% $0 2030-W10** River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 58% $1,354,926 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $2,738,000 - $1,354,926 2030 TOTAL: $72,241,000 - $64,464,846 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 74 Table 53: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050 CIP Projects are not eligible to be included in this impact fee total. 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $68,177,000 System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $4,775,000 2050 TOTAL: $72,952,000 Table 54: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Near Term CIP Growth Projects NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 21% $1,440,972 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 0% $0 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24" $10,425,000 23% $2,378,763 NT-S4** Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 20% $771,788 NT-S5** Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 25% $526,887 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 83% $13,523,463 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 74% $2,517,091 Near Term Growth Subtotal: $45,760,800 - $21,158,965 System Improvement Projects NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 0% $0 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 0% $0 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 0% $0 Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $1,763,000 - $0 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $47,523,800 - $21,158,965 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 75 Original 2009 master plan cost was $9,000,000 and the 2024 construction cost was $13,000,000 resulting in a difference of $3,400,000. Table 55: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 67% $1,359,153 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8" $1,338,000 5% $68,849 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 10% $249,210 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 12% $47,722 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8" $1,663,000 83% $1,372,188 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 33% $1,613,509 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 100% $1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8" $475,000 100% $475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10" $2,525,000 100% $2,522,465 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10" $1,038,000 100% $1,034,756 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8" $3,113,000 97% $3,012,264 2030-S12 FM 1518 8" $400,000 40% $160,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 99% $2,677,145 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8" $2,963,000 29% $849,531 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8" $1,275,000 52% $661,379 2030 Growth Subtotal: $29,342,000 - $18,041,171 System Improvement Projects 2030 SI-1** Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 22% $1,833,143 2030 SI-2** Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 9% $121,579 2030 SI-3** Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 4% $46,406 2030 SI-4** Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 4% $13,741 2030 SI-5** Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 61% $3,099,614 2030 SI-6** Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 5% $392,686 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 0% $0 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $24,527,000 - $5,507,169 2030 TOTAL: $53,869,000 - $23,548,341 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 76 Table 56: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-S1 I-35 N 8" $9,088,000 2050 CIP projects are not eligible to be included in the impact fee total. 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8" $6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8" $2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8" $1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $28,865,000 System Improvement Projects 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $5,602,000 2050 TOTAL: $34,467,000 Table 57: CCMA 2030 System Improvement Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Project Cost Proposed 2030 CIP CCMA System Improvement Projects 2030 C-1 Roy Richard Drive Replacements $1,588,000 2030 C-2 Valencia Lane Replacements $2,288,000 2030 C-3 Savannah Drive Replacements $12,425,000 2030 C-4 Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line $12,950,000 CCMA System Improvement Projects Total: $29,251,000 5.5 Water Meter Updates Part of the update to the impact fees included updating the water meter types and characteristics to correspond with the new meters that the City will now be utilizing. The City was previously using simple, compound, and turbine type meters. Going forward, the City will be using multi-jet and ultrasonic meters. The maximum allowable impact fees by meter size were calculated by multiplying the LUE per meter by the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees. Table 58 shows the difference in the existing and proposed meter characteristics. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 77 Table 58: Existing & Proposed Meter Characteristics Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate (gpm) Normal Flow Range (gpm) Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Existing LUE by Meter Size Proposed LUE by Meter Size 5/8" MULTI-JET 20 1-20 15 1.0 1.0 3/4" MULTI-JET 30 2-30 20 1.5 1.3 1" MULTI-JET 50 3-50 30 2.5 2.0 2" ULTRASONIC 250 0.5-250 250 10.0 16.7 3" ULTRASONIC 500 1-500 500 24.0 33.3 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 1.5-1,000 1,000 42.0 66.7 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 3-1,600 1,600 92.0 106.7 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 5-2,800 2,800 80.0 186.7 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 14-5,500 5,500 250.0 366.7 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 14-5,500 5,500 330.0 366.7 These meter type changes affected the maximum flow rate for continuous duty for each meter size, which established the updated LUE per meter. The LUE per meter size corresponds to the equivalent impact fees for each meter size. See Appendix 31 for the new multi-jet and ultrasonic meter characteristics. 5.6 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees TLGC requires that the maximum allowable impact fee may not exceed the value of the total impact fee eligible costs (identified in Section 5.4 of this report) less the required credit that reduces the overall impact fee eligible costs, divided by the growth in LUEs. This credit to the growth-related cost component of the impact fee calculation is required under Local Government Code Chapter 395 to ensure that new service units are not double charged for impact fee related capital improvements. The credit can be determined in the following ways: · A credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan. · In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. 5.6.1 Credit Analysis The first method was used to calculate the credit and was applied as shown in Table 59 and Table 60. This credit calculation method was performed by the City’s financial consultant, Willdan Financial Services. According to Wildan’s report, there were seven critical assumptions made in order to determine the credits: 1) Willdan assumed a ten-year period for the calculation, FY 2025 – FY 2034, consistent with guidelines set by Chapter 395. 2) Willdan utilized Capital Improvement Plan cost estimates and percentages of each project allocable to growth developed by City staff and its consulting engineers (LAN). 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 78 3) Growth estimates were based on the latest forecasts as presented by the City’s consulting engineers (LAN). 4) Terms and interest rates for new debt forecast to be issued for growth-related improvements were based on estimates used in the City’s 2023 water and wastewater rate study. 5) Willdan is interpreting Chapter 395 so that the debt allocable to growth-related projects includes both principal and interest. 6) Current debt allocable to growth-related projects was based on estimates provided by City staff. 7) The totals represent Net Present Values of the ten-year cash flows utilizing a discount rate of 6.0%. From these assumptions, the following values were calculated: WATER Revenue Credit -- $3,365,530 WASTEWATER Revenue Credit -- $4,611,802 The full report and detailed credit calculations can be found in Appendix 32. 5.6.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee After the calculated credit is applied, the total impact fee eligible costs are divided by the growth in LUEs (discussed in Sections 2 & 5.1 of this report) to obtain the maximum allowable impact fee per LUE. Table 59 and Table 60 summarize the maximum allowable impact fee calculations, including credits. Table 59: Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $65,943,379 Credit (Calculated: 5.1%) ($3,365,530) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $62,577,849 Growth in LUEs 7,100 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee per LUE $8,814 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 79 Table 60: Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $44,707,306 Credit (Calculated: 8.6%) ($4,611,802) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $40,095,504 Growth in LUEs 7,217 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee per LUE $5,556 As discussed in the previous section, updates were made to the meter types that the City will be using. Table 61 reflects both the update to the impact fees by meter type and the new meter characteristics. The impact fee by meter size was calculated by multiplying the proposed LUE by the maximum allowable water or wastewater impact fee for per LUE (identified in the tables above). In the last two columns of Table 61, the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees by meter size are presented. Table 61: Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Proposed LUE Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8" MULTI-JET 15 1.0 $8,814 $5,556 3/4" MULTI-JET 20 1.3 $11,810 $7,445 1" MULTI-JET 30 2.0 $17,627 $11,112 2" ULTRASONIC 250 16.7 $146,924 $92,615 3" ULTRASONIC 500 33.3 $293,848 $185,231 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 66.7 $587,607 $370,406 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 106.7 $940,154 $592,639 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 186.7 $1,645,248 $1,037,104 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 80 5.7 Comparison of Local Impact Fees Since the last water and wastewater impact fee update was performed in 2011, the City expressed interest in comparing the 2024 proposed fees with other municipalities and utility providers in the area. Table 62 provides a comparison of the impact fees imposed by local municipalities and utility providers, and the City of Schertz 2024 proposed impact fees. The City can decide to adopt lower impact fees than those established by this report, typically to spur more development, but should have a means to recoup the costs building the infrastructure to serve the developments. Table 62: Local Impact Fee Comparison City/Utility Total Water Wastewater Population Served (At the Time of Individual Analysis) Pflugerville (2023) $29,849 $14,713 $15,136 65,191 NBU (2022) $25,692 $19,448 $6,244 90,403 Seguin (2023) $16,558 $7,308 $9,250 29,470 Schertz (Proposed 2024) $14,369 $8,814 $5,556 45,719 SAWS (2024) $9,350 $5,987 $3,363 2,000,000 Austin (2023) $7,700 $4,800 $2,900 961,000 Boerne (2023) $7,629 $2,509 $5,120 18,232 San Marcos (2018) $6,485 $3,801 $2,684 68,217 Schertz (Current from 2011) $4,603 $2,934 $1,669 34,754 Cibolo (2021) $2,712 $1,839 $873 34,000 Sources can be found in Appendix 33. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 81 6. LIST OF APPENDICES SECTION 2 Appendix 1 – 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Appendix 2 – Zoning Map Appendix 3 - 30-Year Population Distribution Projections Appendix 4 - 30-Year Housing Distribution Projections Appendix 5 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 6 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 7 - Planned & Existing Commercial Development Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 8 - Planned & Existing Commercial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 9 - Wastewater CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use Appendix 10 - Water CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use SECTION 3 Appendix 11 – Near Term Water CIP Map Appendix 12 – 2030 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 13 – 2030 Water CIP Map Appendix 14 – 2050 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 15 – 2050 Water CIP Map SECTION 4 Appendix 16 – Flow Meter, Meter Basin, & Rain Gauge Location Map Appendix 17 – Dry Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 18 – Wet Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 19 – Existing System Evaluation Results, Surcharge, & SSO Location Maps Appendix 20 – Near Term Wastewater Growth & System Improvement Projects Appendix 21 – 2030 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 22 – Max Depth to Diameter with 2030 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 23 – Sanitary Sewer Overflows with 2030 Wet Weather Flows Appendix 24 – 2030 Wastewater System Improvement Projects 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 82 Appendix 25 – 2050 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 26 – Max Depth to Diameter With 2050 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 27 – 2050 Wastewater System Improvement Projects SECTION 5 Appendix 28 – Inflation Rate Calculation Sources Appendix 29 – CIP Projects Cost Estimates Appendix 30 – CIP Projects Utilization Calculations Appendix 31 – Octave Meter Specifications Appendix 32 – Willdan Revenue Credit Calculations & Summary Appendix 33 – Impact Fee Comparison Sources APPENDIX 1 - 2018 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN !"#$53 Æÿ9003 Æÿ4061 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ87 Æÿ2522 Æÿ284 Æÿ8151 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ4061 Æÿ8151 Æÿ9003 Æÿ87 !"#$53 BEXARCOUNTY GUADAL U P E C O U N T Y COMAL C O U N T Y BEXARCOUNTY GUADALUPECOUNTY COMALCOUNTY SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHERTZ C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCH E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHE R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHERT Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZCITYLIMIT SC H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJBOU N D A R Y SCHERTZ C I T Y L I M I T CIBOLOSELMA CONVERSE GARDEN RIDGE UNIVERSALCITY SAN ANTONIO LIVE OAK ST. HEDWIG NEW BRAUNFELS SANTACLARA SAN ANTONIO APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ I APZ I APZ I APZ I Clear Zo n e Clear Zo n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Zo n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Zo n e SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJ BOUNDARY CiboloCreek KINGS LAND SHINOAKDR TOE P P E R W E I N R D GR A N I T E S H O A L S BEAV E R CR K PARKBENDDR BORGFE L D R D S C H A E F E R R D S T O L T E R D H S T W FOREST BLF COUNTR Y L N W O O D GL E N W E I L R D R A N D O L P H BR O O K S P K W Y SPRINGTO W N K R U E G E R CANYON EAV I ATIONBLVD JSTW ELMTRAILDR OAKMONT BEN D SEMIN O LE PA SS C S T W NO R T H B L V D SUNRISECANYO N DR S C H E R T Z P K W Y LO W ER SE G UIN R D GOLFVISTABLVD UNIV E R S A L D R BR E H M L N FO U R T H S T E FIFTH S T W BO U L D E R V W EC K H A R D T R D S O U T H E A S T R D SCHOENTHALRD V E R D E P K W Y DAIS Y W A Y THIR D D R E KING S W O O D S T EN G E L R D FO U R T H S T W CIBOLO VALLEY DR THIR D D R W CHERRYHURST EAST PARK S T A R L I G H T L N NOR T H W E S T R D NO R T H PA R K C S T E NOR T H E A S T R D HANOVER PL ACE F S T W MOONLITRIDGEDR NORTHWESTDR EL M L E A F LN C O U N T RY MILL S O U T H W E S T R D GLENBRIARDR M A R I O N R D M ARIGOLDTRACE HAE C K E R V I L L E R D S CENTER ST N A B B OT T R D FO XBROOK W AY DUS T Y F I E L D S CO U N T R Y C L U B B L V D MAS K E R D LANG D O N D R PARR CL E G G S T SOUTHERNWAY CH E R R Y W O O D L N R E D B U D W A Y MISTYRIDGEDR BR I S C O R D HO L L O W R D G W E I C H O L D R D PVTST ATIH 35N GLENTR L S C H O O L S T RIDG E LINE R D E EV A N S R D OLY MPIAPKWY LOOKOUT R D FO R U M PK W Y SHADY BRO OK E LANGL E Y B L V D ZUEHL RD SC H W AB R D CIBOLO T R L NORTHEASTDR DANA DR LOW E R V A L L E Y L N AL M O N D BEND N S OL MS R D W E N Z E L L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D HUNTERHTS S C H M O E K E L R D GIN R D LOST TREE M A RIC OPA PATH STRATEM A N L N GR E E N V A L L E Y R D SENECACRK 3 R D AV E W R U E C K L E R D NEW B ST W W A L Z E M R D BR E T O N PAS S LIECK CV TR A I N E R H A L E R D C YRU S MC C O R MICK S E I D E L S T KITTY H A W K R D W S C H U L Z S T W A RE-SEGUIN R D TU TTLEST S P R I N G T R E E H O L W Q U A R T E T T L N LIV E O A K R D LOV E L N MEL W O O D PL A C E LANDMAR K FALL S MONTG O M ERYDR S P O K E CIR PIONEERPOINT DR JIMMY W A L K E R PAT BOOKER R D R O S E S P U R P A R K NANDINACT BU F F A L O C R O S S I N G AV E N U E A CANOPYB E ND IH 35 N A C CESS R D PEACEFULDR HOLLY LN S H A L L O W CR O S S I N G AUTH O RIT Y LN OAS I S S T H O P E LN EL I W H I T N E Y WAG O NCROSSING S AGE OAK FORESTRIDGEPKWY TR E L L I S W A L K O BERNAIPATH MIR A M A R B L V D CIR C L E D R BL U E S P R U C E D R MOR N I N G S I D E D R WILDWINDPARK VISTAVW MEANDERIN G TRL JAY B R O O K D R HIG H CREEKRD GOL F TEE LO S T F O R E S T D R MY S T I C TO P A Z HITC H R D IDLE W O O D F RIENDLY AC R E S EMMETPARK RUBY RITZ STA C K ST ONE BR I G H T L E A F D R TOMKITE CT TEX A S DR BALBOADR OAKBUD VISTADR MINNIES T BARRELSTAGE AUS T I N D R IV YPOS T SPORT AVIATION DR JUSTIC E L N HAR V E S T B E N D BRONZEROCK DR FO R U M R D PEACOC K L N R O U N D CR K HIKER S HOL W B EAVERELM KAY L E E C H A S E 2NDAVEW SH AD Y PARK LN OLIV I A RAY C O R BETT D R NORRISDRW BIND S EIL G ROVE V E N T U R A B L V D CL O V E R L E A F D R SOMBRAHILL BEGONIA N E W B ST E TR A C E CR K 8TH S T BR O O K V W DE A N R D MISTY Q UAIL MAY F A I R HALFHOCK S T I L L B R O O K LN FAIR L A W N A V E LO N E S H A D O W T R L OLDAUSTINRD 3R D A VE E WENSL E DALE D R SECRETSHORES CHE S T NUT D R S T A D L E R C V SAHARA WOODS R I D G E PILOT M U LE DE E R WILD RID G E T R L W I L L O W HIL L PELICANPLACE S O U T H S T HUNTER S GLEN BOBBYJO NES D R WHISTLER N L I V E OA K S T OLDEMOSS 1ST S T THISTLECREEK D R CO T T O N K I N G S P O K E HOLW OAK CIR TO W N CR E E K W A Y CRESTWAYRD BU LL CREE K DR TIM B E R S P G S WOODVIEW DR SUNRIS EPASS GR E E N M E A D O W S CHAMPIONS P A S S BUTTONBALL DR BEAROAK HINGEGATE MAR I L Y N D R RUSTYSPUR COLT TRAIL MOR G A N R U N VAL LEY OAK DR W O O D B R I D G E W A Y GLENPT PRIVILEG E P T LARAMIEHILL R H O D E S BL A C K S T O N E C V HILLVIE W LN Q U A I L D R W I L L O W BR O O K FF S T BR A H M A W A Y R Y E R D LONG C O V E D R COPPERW O O D S TW I N C R E E K F A R M DAV E N P O R T CAC T U S F L O W E R RUDDYDUCK FAR R I N LN N SAN TA CLA RA R D HEIGHTS VALLEY W I L L O W W A R B L E R UTICA W AY C O U NTR Y VA LE OSPREYLN POR T C H E S T E R LIB R A L N PANOLA PASS CORDOBA DR BAL LINGER CAP R I L N VISTAPKW Y PHEAS A N T PEN I C K W A Y B S T W AST W W H I S P E R CANY O N A S T E LO N E C R E S T L N B S T E HAR M O N D R AL A B A S T E R R O O STER R U N LAZY F O R E S T D R TUMBLE W EE D RU N S A D D L E H O R N W A Y Q U E E N S L A N D W A Y LIN D A LEE LN STIRRU P DR EN C H A N T E D V W TR I A N G L E R A N C H CUR T I S S A V E FR E D C O U P L E S HAR V E S T SSOLMS RD TIMMER M A N C V INDIG O B RUSH DR T ULS A TR L BR I A R K N O L L MOUNT LATMOS UNIVERSALCITYBLVD PEN C I L C H O L L A S P R I N G BR O O K ANTRIU M NATIONAL BLV D COPPER M I S T D A RTMO UTH C V OAKMEADOWS S A G E N I T E B R O O K H O LLOW D R C O RRAL FENCE S I L V E R OA K C O RD ER O DR CATTL E BEN D F S T E CO P P E R D A W N S W A T E R L N LIN D A CT WOODL AND OAKS D R EL L E R S T O N B L V D MIL L E R R D W I G E O N W A Y S A D D L E V I L L A S U N S T E M S H A R O N CT FORSYTHPARK W I T T E N ROLLINGBROOKLN R O A N CIR NUPECANGROVE S U N BL O O M S P R I N G CIR S Y C A M O R E D R AUTUMNLED G E CENT U R Y FA R M DR S U N S H I N E FAL L S Z O ELLE RWAY L O N G LEA F PK W Y D S T E COV E HILL LONGING T R L CH A P S S T AMAL F I PAR K V A L L E Y F O R G E D R V E N T U R E W A Y W S A N ANTONIO S T RIVA RID G E CIR HA W K C I R V I L L A E L M MOR N I N G R O S E SUNFLOW ER DR MACON AV E BR I D L E BE N D AGORA PKW Y V A L E R I A D R ESTE RYEMOONCV PINEHAV E N DE V O N W O O D S T EAS T ST W AS HLEY PAR K LAUR A N PAR K D R S M O K E BR E W LA C E L E A F L N FOREST RAIN W H I T E EL M V I L L A G E O A K D R R A TTLESNAKE WAY MOR N I N G D R TR E E CR O W N BR I A R L N WHITAK E R HIGHLANDVISTA QUIETV W 7 T H S T KEY W E S T W A Y THIR D S T W O RTH AV E MOUNTAIN BR O O K GOLDENBEARDR W A T E R O A K FIR E C R E E K DR CR E T I A N IS L E G O LDEN O A K TIGUEX S U N D E W CIR W E L L B R O O K COCO MEADOW FORTYUMA LAUR A B L F FAL L E N S T O N E GAR D N E R C V TUL I P S T DAY L A N H T S S U N N Y B EN D CR E E K S I D E HILL W H I T E TR L MCBR I D E BR I D G E BRO A DLEAF MELISSA CT F ORE ST CO R N E R BR O O K S H A D O W OAKTR E E C I R CL Y D E S D A L E R U N BOWIE CV COPPERFALL S PIS C E S C RYSTAL VALLE Y DR DEER CREEKBLVD CANTER B U R Y L N PA R K F A I R GAT E SAVE R N E WA Y JU DITH A N N DR CUTLER BR I D G E CY P R E S S PT SAN PAT RICIOBLVD HING E F A L L S COPPER W A Y OA K P L A C E PINTALEPT TR A V I S D R BAY H I L L D R TITAN PARADISEPASS DANEPAR K DOUGL A S S T DO C OL E N A GINKO CIR UL L R I C H R D S P R I N G T R E E BEND R O Y C E R A N C H R D AS T E R R U N PVTRD AT JESS ES CIR SPRINGTREE CV BECKER S T W I L D MEAD O W COLIN A WAY COV E CR E S T HOPESHOLW MIS T F L O W E R D R BOOKERBAY H ORSESHOE TR L SANDHILLC R A N E D O RAL CT MAGN OLIA M A N O R SWILLO W W AY HIDDENGR O V E BL A I N CIRBL A C K PINE COR U M TR A I L D R CO P P E R NES T S SANTA CL A RA RD NOR RISDR E CAN Y O N V I S T A CIT A D E L PEAK WHISPER VW IVORY O AK DR MIS T Y HO L L O W D R KA RIB A C V SILV E R T O N D R FIR E B I R D R U N SPOTTED O WL SCARLETFIREDR KR U T H PT MES Q UITE C HASE GAILCIR V I S T A D E NUBES ADALIN E WAY BENINGV A L L E Y TAU R U S CADDINGTONDR R E D TIP D R EL D R I D G E D R MANOR S I D E BL A C K B R I E R DR BOG I E W A Y BRENDAFRANCES S P A R T A N TER R A C E IBISAVE CHAPE L H I L L C R US AD E R B EN D C RY S T AL P L AIN S O U T H W E S T E R N AV E VALENCIALN CONCHO CR K COPPERSKY BERRY DR PAL O M I N O C V BITTE R W O O D D R CHUR C H OAK GR O O M S R D W I L D C H E R R Y WALNUTSPGS S U N S E T C V SCENICCRK R E D R I P P L E AR A B I A N C R K FR I T Z W A Y PAR K L A N D S W A Y HIGHLAND G R AS S TIDELN OAK CT SCENICDR W I L D C A T R U N CO Y O T E H I L L THE B E S ZUEHL CED A R CT IR I S H C R E E K R D TO W N C R E E K R D FIR D A L E FIR E STONE P K W Y PR E S T W I C K W A Y IRIS RUN CIRCLE O A K D R FO R E S T O A K WHITE PINE DR ME N L O RAILLN PINTAIL W A Y CRESTED HTS PR A I R I E L N FLINT R D AS H W O O D R D W O O DLA WN F AR MS PRAIRIE OAK COPPERR I S E SARATOGA PLACE BR I A R MEADOW CY P R E S S CT GARDEN CIR CHUOKE FALL I N G O A K DST G ARDENARBOR PHEBE BLACKSTONE SLUMBERLN DONSHIREDR COR O N A D O B L V D M C C O Y W O ODS W O T T O S T CAS P I A N BAY D R S H E R V I N W A Y A S T P VT ST AT T HE FORU M OAKVALLE Y GNAR L E D OAK W I L L O W CV MEADOW L A N D BR E E Z Y C V FOR E S T R I D G E D R MAR E PAS S WALNUT BASIN MIM O SA C T R I O BL A N C O MY S T I C W A Y GR A S S L A N D DR AZ U L S K Y CT W L A N G L E Y B L V D GLEN HTS BIN D S EIL C RE EK BR O W N O A K BINDS E I L L N AZALEA G ATE JACQ U E L I N E S T F O REST S Q MANDERLYPLACE S T A L L I O N C V AL B A R E L L A SIERRASPGS PEC A N CT UTOPIA BLVD MER I O N W A Y CAND Y D R HAGENW A Y AR N I E LN FO R E ST B R E EZE MES Q UITEPASS PAR K L E A F LAR K S P U R V W TRAILHOLW SCHMIDTAVE S A G E S T E M STONEYCREEKDR KR I E R C V BE EBL V D LOM AVISTAST MATTHEW S T LIS A M E A D O W S DE E R M E S A FO REST BRAN C H NIR A GOL F MIS T JOSHUATREE FR E E S T O N E OLD NACO GDOCHES RD T OPPLINGLN CL O U D C R O S S I N G R E D H A W K BE NTW O O D R ANCHDR CARRICKCT AGARITA CIR TR E M O N T S T GA T E W O O D CL I F F LEAFYHOLW S T O N E Y P T W H I T E B R U S H CENTERBROOK LOCH L O M O N D D R AM B E R L Y C T VILLAGEPARK PLU M R A N CH R D PEB B L E R U N BL U E B I R D HAV E N BY P A S S T R A I L S S A N D V E R B E N A AR R O W R I D G E STANLEY PARK S L E E P Y MEAD O W BALBOA PARK DAHLIA S T O N E B R O O K DROGELTH O R PE CIR CR E S T O A K D R H O C KLEY HILL VESOUL VALLEY PECAN S T ANG O R A T R L S P R I N G T R E E GA T E Q U I V I R A D R BARBARABEND LACALA KEY L A R G O B L V D R O M A AFTONCANYON CIVIL CR OSSIN G PR I C K L Y P E A R D R LOOKOUTV W P E N SIVE D R B UFFLEHEADDR W A G O N W H E E L W A Y SONATACT E LEGION DR BIG HO RN T R L TIMB E R C R E E K DR CHER O K E E P A T H WHITEROCK ARABIA NKING GATEWOOD BAY N WILLO W W A Y BOR D E N OAK CRICKET PLACE PILLORYPOINTE JEANETTE DR ARB O R PARKLN S A F A R I D R DAY S T A R PO R T ER N I E W A Y GR E E N S T O N E CJ J O N E S C V HIC KO R Y HO LW M O NU M E NT PASS M ESA VE RDE S A D D L E T R L W E I R R D BR I A R S T JONAS D R CONGRESSIONAL BLVD PAR K V I E W D R FOR T U N E HILL G OTHIC DR GLE N NOO K D R DEL A W A R E PAR K S A D D L E CR K BRISTOL OAK OA K R U N CINNABAR C T F AIRFA X D R W EBST E R DR HINGE CHAS E BY R O N DR MEADOW V I E W D R BERRYWAY PECOS P T S P R I N G MEADOW L N SEC R ETARIATDR KIMBERLYDR COPPER C R E E K TAV E R N TR A I L D R S U N S E T H T S CAPEMEADOWDR CRA NB R O OK LIBER T Y S O U N D R I M D A L E OLDANI DR S A S S M A N R D D O VE RUN BENTL E I G H DR DE VACA DR BL U E V I S T A W I N D M I L L FALD OCV W B Y R D B L V D HO L L E R I N G V I N E GARDENNORTH DR JU PITER HAVEN HAY S P A R C R D CAS C A D E DR FETLOCK DONOVANPARK H O M E S T E AD PKWY ROARINGSPG R U I D O S O CHAS E OAKDR TWINBRANCH B R AES W OOD LN ST VINCENT W A Y DONALAN DR CHUR C H S T S A D D L E P A S S S P RIN G W O O D SQ CRYSTAL CANYON W A Y N E DR BATTERYPARK PEAL E DR SADDLE SPOKE NUHNW A Y HA R V E S T H I L L B L V D T R O PH Y CLU B LIBERTY HO RSE S H A D O W M T D R LANDMAR K HAV E N NORTHALLERTO N BR U N N I N G CT PLANELN C OLO NE L RD G GREENSHIRE D R MIDWELL CR E P E MY R T L E L N FAL L O N CT ALSATIAN W AY W W R I G H T B L V D W I E D E R S T E I N R D AESOPLN PAR K H T S POINT VIEW DR FER N MEADOWDR HOL L O W GLE N KINGBIR D PL A C E SHADOW MOSSCT DE L TA DR W H I S P E R TR A C E KIL D A R E DE LAGAR Z A STU RD Y O A K DR JANIC E D R M O S S W O O D C O GHILL RO SLIN F O R EST SICILY ISLE PAL I S A D E S D R BE NHOGANCT M ARO O N ST MIL L S T FLIC K A HILLS CIBOLOHTS HILL T O P A V E AR R O Y O LOMA REDSKYCRK F S T ELOOP1604NACCESSRD W I N G E D E L M HARVEST CANYON EL K GLAD E R A N C H O HIDALG O MEAD O W S O N G BURROBEND S H A D O W Y C K PL U M A S DO E R R L N FAL C O N PA R K N LA VERNIA ST CHUCK W A G O N C T ANDERSONB LF HAL L I E H T S MUS E S PE A L E CT ZOELL E R CV N BAR N E T T S T LES L I E H T S S A V A N N A H D R MICHELLE TR ANCE L N WIED ERSTEIN ST SOMERVELL BACKNINE R A I N LILY L N DR A Y T O N U N N A M E D ST AT R A N D O LPH A F B BR I T E R D SUM MIT HILLDR CL E A R W A T E R B L V D LAURALLN W I L D C O Y O T E T R L EAGLEEY E PE C A N PT CABALL O C A N Y O N E S C H U L Z S T BELM ONT RD G S MOKEY P OINTE GATE BR I D G E H OYALN FELICIA FO X G L O V E PAS S E KR U E G E R S T KOV E LN BODECIR IV O R Y C R E S T D R HILTO N DR C R O W N OAK W E L L D R E N CA NTOVISTADR TRAILDUST LN S W E E T G U M L N SOUTHCREEK PV T S TAT A G O R A PKWY GLE N FOX TUR N I N G S T O N E MEADOW B U R S T MUL BE R RY DR DOBIE B L VD NEW R O C K CR K MEA D O W S C A P E AUTUMN AR B O R RED W OO D CIR S UNRIDGE D R M A RIE M E A D O W TERRA COTTA POQ U I T O CIR FO R E S T FARM TUMB LEBROOK MEADOW F O R G E PA R K G L E N PRIM R O S E WA Y JAR R A T T MIS T Y W O O D LN WILMINGTONWAY STOR MY BR O O K EM E L I A S T GLE N EAG L E S D R W ATS ON W AY H O O T O WL SCENIC LIN KS ARCHES VALLEY SHARP HILL SECRET HOLW E HUEBINGER S T AARONLN S W E E T L E A F LN PATS Y D R S H A D Y CV TR AILSIDE LN EM E R A L D BL F SA RAT OG A K N OLL G AMBLE W O OD MEAD O W BRANCH M A RIGO LD WAY N ORT H L E D GE DR TONNEDRE A N DE RSONWAY W I E D N E R R D EASY MEADOW DR KER R Y B R O O K D R MUN S T E R DR S T A B L E HO L W MUSTANGCV FE RRELL RD W I L L O W PATH W H U E B I N G E R S T IVO RY CR K SPLIT O A K C ROOKED OAK GATEW O O D TR A C E W H I S P E R BR A N C H E KLEINS T AUDREYRDG ISLAN DHOLLOW S A D D L E R U N F RIE S ENHAH N L N ANDR E W LOW R I F L E R O C K TEAKWOOD TREE S U M M E R HAV E N L N BUFFAL O T R L VIRTU OS O PA SS FIEL D S W A Y VALLEYPARKDR CO E R S B L V D BEACONGLEN COPPER R O S E W E S T C H E S T E R D R C H ESTNUT BLUFFDR LORING PARK ABER C O R N HINGE PATH GU S T Y P T GR A N A D A D R WIND MILL WAY BL A C K HO R S E R I C H A R D S O N DR STALLIO N RAN C H FIS H E R R D APPLE SPGS FO R E S T C R O WN OA K S T BALLE Y PT TALLOAK DIM R O C K L O N E S T A R W A Y IVY MOUNTAIN PL U M CIR FRONTIER R D G CHES T N U T BEAR W K R U E G E R S T HER I T A G E V W ROANOKE D R R OUNDUP W AY R A N C H HOUS E R D C YLA M EN BL O O M BEND MOS S Y L N WAVIATIO N B LVD WINGED F OO T NOR W O O D C T S P R I N G F A W N S C O T T S BL F GO O D N I G H T C I R W H I T T M E N AV E ROUNDHAYPA RK REDBUDCIR IV A N D R NO R T H S T BL A C K B U T T E F O R E ST SU M MIT CH R Y S A N T H E M U M COPPER HOLW CAP S T O N E HIGHV I S T A MEADOWSPGS W H I S P E R M A N O R AM A R Y L L I S HAW T HO R NE PAS S LOUELL A D R S H E T L A N D P A S S SELESTAT PT G ATEW OOD FALLS COP PE R BLUFF SUNVIE W VALLEY BY P A S S CANY O N ANDRE LAS S O LN GRAPEVINEDR FUR L O N G GATE MA D I S O N C R K NIEMIET Z C V HA R N E S S L N PINTO P L A C E JAS P E R H I L L L N THO M A S W O L F E W HIS P ER RDG LIV I N G S T O N D R BL A Z E M O O N TEN EVA CV W I L L O W TR E E S P A R R O W W A Y TA N G E R TE R R A C E S U N D E W M I S T PL A N T E R S P A S S RETAMA CRO W N COPPER S A N D S FIS H E R S PATH TAR I N PT W I L L O W R U N KENS I N G E R P A S S PAINT E D R I V E R VAL LEY PAS S EV E N I N G LAUR E L GAMB E L S Q U A I L GR A N D V I S T A COLT C R O S SING CATTL E R U N R O D E O WAY LANTANA S P G PARADISERD WAHL L N T R AIL BROOK CR E E K R U N LOOKOV E R B A Y MINER A L S P GS BIS O N L N BELMONTPKWY ANV I L P L A C E S H A D O W W O O D L N SILVER WING IH 10 W A C C E S S R D W H I S P E R G L E N BETT Y J O E LN BR O N C O BEN D PEACEAVE TOMAHAWK CIR CL O V E R B R O O K L N GOEBEL M E T ZV A L L E Y PIONEER HILLS BEL L E G L A D E B L V D AN G E L S DR W LINDBER G H B L V D FAL L I N G S U N JU L I A N P T SPYGLASSCV CO P P E R H U R S T L O D E S T O N E S O A P S T O N E COPPERS P G IDAMAR I E BERRY C R EEK D R MAPL E D R DOVEWING MEDICINER O C K HIGH T R A I L R D BANDANA ST FAIR T O N PL A C E PA S A T I E M P O BA R E B A C K BE N D KIP P E R AV E BL A C K H I L L S C T SLEEPY VILLA G E TW I N L N WATERFALLPASS SLEEPYLN OAK CR EE K DR BADLAN D BEACON W I L L O W BL F EAS Y O A K CR K G A R D E NIA BENDDR VINE LEAF DAKOTA CR K BL U E W I L L O W SEAHEADRIGDR CR I N U M LILY D R CR O S S B R A N C H DR HANOV E R CV PUL I T Z E R R D BILTMOR E MANOR AMISTADBLVD PINS E E K E R CR Y S T A L V W LAURELCRK R U S T I C A C R E S S U N S ET R D G W O O D S I D E W A Y LAR G OZA AVE H OURLE S S O A K S ANNDR CHELS E A D R R A N D O L P H A V E CR O W N CT R U S H CA N Y O N N MAIN S T S E R I CV RO SE RALLY W AY MY R T L E T R L S U N S E T D R HOOS I E R PAR K FIR CIR KEY S O U T H W A Y PIONEEROAK TOP R I D G E L N W I L L O W V W A S HLE Y MEADO W OZUNA DR WINTERFROST L A N D M A R K BEN D MERRYWOOD KEY N O R T H W A Y CLINTON RD R AINBO W GLAD E ROANST BR I G A D I E R P A S S LINC O LN DR THIS T L E DER B Y R U N PURO O R O DR LOS T M A P L E S W A Y TAMAR O N HINGECR K WILLOWDR Q UIET PIN E DE R B Y VIS TA LONESO ME VALLEY VIGN ETTE COL E CR E E K D R CONV E R S E B U S I N E S S L N REMILLY WAY POSEIDON S T O R M M T R D G AM BLEST SUNSHIN E TRAILDR APACHE FOR E S T R O S E B U D V I S T A GR A S S Y T R L COR U M R I D G E D R S A D D L E N E S T CY P R E S S W I L L O W CANTER B U R Y H I L L R U G G E D O A K S D R W E D G E W O O D D R GLE N S I D E MAY F L O W E R A PA C H E L E D G E FOGGY MOONDR AU R O R A S K Y TO W E R B L F FOR E S T W A Y C HIMNEY TRL S A R R E B O U R G S T KITTY HAWK R U N S M O K I N G O A K S AUTUMN PLACE MCALIS T E R LN CHERRYHILLSCT K N E UPPER R D E BY R D B L V D GOL F TR E E V E R B E N A G A P WHOOPING CRANE W HITESANDS SIR BA R TO N B A Y W ALT W HITM AN WAY LAURA KATHY IV Y M A N O R LONES T A R GAIT TURKEY TREE CO Y O T E C R K AUTUMN ACR E S O A K PARK MEADOWASHDR S A R D I N A DIV E R S E Y D R TIRREMA GR A N V I L L E PEA K WOODLAKETRL HIDD E N ME S A S U N S E T T R L SLEEP Y RIV E R FER N W O O D DR EL E G A N T E W A Y MA N D O L I N O L N NIG H T HA W K BO E I N G CO R N E R BILL HASS S T E P H A N I E G E E IR O N K E T T L E SILV E R BUCK L E LANCER H I L L AR T E S I A W E L L S MOUNTAIN OAK C AP O T COURTLN CHESTNUT BLUE STONEFIELD HIGH PL AINS W A L N U T C R E S T W I N D W I L L O W GAT E W O O D M I S T I S T E DEP O S I T I O N GA P W I L L O W W O O D S T R A S B O U R G W A Y PECAN GROVEDR PIONEER T R L S U N R I S E R U N D R NOBL E W A Y DO L E N T E R D MAL L A R D COR N E R BL A C K H A W K S K Y MEDIATOR R U N MC C U L L O C H GL E N N FAZIO D R KR I E R CR O S S BY P A S S S H O A L S W I L L I A M S S T ERLINGVW W R I G H T C V ATHENIAN S T O N E Y B R O O K DR LA N D M A R K R U N CAMER O N R I V E R APPELL A T E W A Y F O REST P O N D CIMARRONCV BR O O K H I L L S U N R I V E R D R NOR T H E R N S T A R G W E N D O L Y N W A Y MESCALTRL NOR T H A V E N DR COLLIN G W OOD W I L L R O G E R S D R TYLIN D S T R O M PADOV A FR I A R R O C K W A Y AN D E R S O N CV PFEIL S T W E E P I N G W I L L O W W E E P I N G O A K D R GILA BEND DIS C OVERY W AY SNOWMEADOWDR BR O O K R U N ALTON BLV D W I L L O W CL I F F COPPEREL M D R TUR K I S H OAK N ELLD EANE BLVD V O I R DIR E W H I T E H O R N D R O RIE NTAL TRL GULFSHOREBLVD S U N S E T F L I G H T KR I E R L E D G E W I N K L E R T R L DES E R T R O S E W O L F F R U N S T R E A M C R O S S I N G CO L B U R N W A Y S A D D L E S P U R TR I P L E C R O W N SILE NT C O U N T RY SKY H A RB O R FORESTER B E N D HIDDEN CAV E BOV I S CT AUBUR N P A R K PEC A N BR A N C H COV E T R L R I D G E GAR D E N D R NAUMANNW A Y C H E STNUTASHDR HAZELTINE W A Y G R A NITEMIST BUCK M O UNTAIN V I C K I L Y N N EA GLE VALL EY ST DISC OVERY MILL THR A S H E R TR L IR O N R I D G E PAS S GA L W A Y FALCON R I D G E D R R I M R O C K TR L ROCKHILLVW GA V E L PAS S C HESTN UT O AK S I L V E R S P G S A W G R A S S B R OOKHEA D LN FOR B A C H D R M AYBERRY MILL HE M I N G W A Y T R L KEN S I N G T O N D R S P R I N G T R E E CIR BLAKELY ST R E D B A R N R U N TR A C T O R P A S S W A Y S I D E T R L MES Q U I T E CIR LIN D B E R G H A V E PER I D O T MANDEV I L L A S U NSET VIS TA DEW FALL TRL OSAG EAVE S A D D L E C V MEDIATORPAS S S TAMPEDE RANCH AR C A D I A P L A C E MIM O S A D R HAW K S M E A D O W S UNNA MED S T AT N ATIO N AL BLVD DEER F I E L D B L V D RID G E BL F S E M I N O L E D R DALEWOODDR MUIR F I E L D W A Y PIEDMONT PL A C E AR C H E R S CO A C H H A R TLE Y S Q INKS W O O D MOHAWK DR NO E L F O R E S T WO ODC LIFF BLV D BL U E M O O N S P U R CHERYLMEADOW COPPERES T A T E AL D E R S GATE OAKF O R EST D R HARVES T PT G R A Y S O N CL I F F BRANCH HOLLOWDR NAV A J O C I R COPPER O A K KLO N DIKE CV GIV E R N Y C T EA G L E FLI G H T HO U S T O N D R C A R N O U STY DR R E D S T O N E M A N O R R I D G E FIR E LAS E R R A TUR F CL U B CH E R O K E E HILL TUSCA N HILLSDR W E E P I N G W A Y BO W I E D R DY E S S CO R N E R COWB O Y TRLOWL CREEKRD S I O U X L N DELMONTEDR H O N EY G R OVE CR O C K E T T A R ROYOVERDE R O B E R T S T E V E N S PEAS E P A R K HIGH LAND PLA C E EV E N I N G BR E E Z E ZUNI B E E CAVE S CV CR E E K S I D E D R PIPE GATE DUSTY C RO SSIN G WAYWORDTRL DEADWOO D R DG CAS C A D E S CV KELLYAVE TR U D Y L N DEAN CHASE CO R T I J O LAHM AV E HEA T H F I E L D CA R L O W 5TH S T W SA N D Y O AKS SHEILA POND GATEW A Y D R R E G E N C Y RUN AR I E S MAGICFALLS MARIETTALN AL P I N O CR E N S H A W CT GR E E N M O U N T A I N D R COPP E R MOO N PER I C L E S D R LO G S W O O D WENRICH COMMON L A W DOV E R GLADE SUSSEXCV PINENEED L E S L N HA R P E R R U N GR A N B E R R Y P A S S GOL D E N V I S T A D AVENPO RT WAY CAV A N BR A C K E N D R SMOKEY PLATTE S NIPSTAR W BORGFELD RD TORCHW OO D D R J S T E W R I G H T A V E ME A D O W W I N D MIL L R I D G E R D W E R N E R S T AR A B I A N CV W S C H L A T H E R S T FUL T O N DR MULHOUSEDR RO TH A U DR ROSEWELLPL ACE IV Y L E A F AV E N U E E BEEAL L E Y TR E V I N O DR W I N N A V E CHER I S S E D R CH A M P I O N O A K GUILF ORD FO R G E BL A K E V I L L E W E S T O A K RAINFALL RDG M ESA PAR KHER M E S D R S T R E S A TOL L E R D CL E A R MEADOW ME A D O W LN BIR K D A L E DR OAK TE R R A C E DR BENCH T R L VALLEY HILLL N RAIN E Y M EAD O WLN PER U G I A D O G W O O D LN BOR E A S W EL L S PA R K S U R R E Y L N IVYPOND W E D G E DR R A I N B O W FALL S HERCULES S I L V E R R I V E R W I N B U R N A V E CL E A R W E L L WILLIA M SCAR BROUGH B O B W HITEDR MEADOW H E A D D R WIND S W EP T C V OLD CIBOLO VALLEY DR RAWE AVE NOR T H E R N HEIGHTS D R ARROW VISTA LALU N A S T A T E BLV D FORE S T NOO K CT MIL L C R O S S L N LA R K S P U R CR E S T W I N D S O R CT RIVERRD CINDERACOVEDR S U N R I S E FAL L S DEWBERRY PARK T E A G U E LN R O S E S H A R O N D R WEST F O R K D R CAPR I C O R N S A W M I L L L N S T O R M R D G STATIO N S T MIL L E R S TR L M A P L E W A Y OVALMEADOW ME A D O W D R BL U E S A G E LN DALY C V GAT E W O O D BR I A R PVTSTAT PATBOOKERRD FIRST ST COPPERG L EN MEAD O W HOR N D R JE R SEY BE N D ATALAYA BIG JOH N LN ROBERT DERRIC K COR K S U M M I T V W W I L L O W POIN T E 2ND S T AR I S T O T L E 4TH S T E BR O U G H T O N SHER WIN DR SUNPOOL BERRY PARK CL OUDSPT 5TH S T E S C A R L E T C R K S A N D P I P E R D R R A M B L A S 6TH S T E V E R D E HILL S MCCAR REN PARK DE S O T O D R ARDENNESLOOP S O P H I E MAR I E BAR R W A Y OLD C ONVER S E RD 1S T S T E 3R D S T E TUR NAB O U T L O O P S A L A D O SADDLE RDG GEORGIAMAE S A S S I E LN MAPLE RIDGEDR IVY CURL HATCHMER E CT RUSTI C WILLO W RHE WPLACE PECAN FALL M O R N I N G D E W N HA C K B E R R Y S T KIN G SLAND CIR WATER WOODDR LUCKY OAKS THIR D S T O L Y MPICDR THUR B E R D R N BEY E R S T CO T S W O L D PEA R L C H A S E P E NINSU LA D R BL U E L A K E R D G AR C A D I A D R MEADOW G A T E KE A N NA PLA C E B A R CELONA PIN G W A Y S T R I C K L A N D R D BR I D G E C R O S S I N G Q UIET CREEK D R FOR U M ACCES S N CU N N I N G H A M S T CHLO ECT PASSE RINA SPUR EL M A V E S C U N N I N G H A M S T CYPRESSMISTDR VISTA PLACE SMOOTHWINE BRESSANIWAY FR O N T I E R CV NO R T H V I E W CIR PATR I C K H E N R Y DIETZ R D D ERBYDAN LAKOTA C T S LA VERNIA ST HID D E N GR O VELN BEA C O N A V E EL F OW L N CE N T E R S T FO U R T H S T INVERNESS W AY CO L O N Y GATHER I N G P A S S THE S S A L Y N PAR K EAS T RADFORDTRL S P A R K W E S T S H A C K B E R R Y S T MOUNTAINSHADOWS FAL C O N BAY OLMSTEAD PARK CAS T L E CT EX C H A N G E A V E CALVERTST S BAR N E T T S T WELLSFARGO S PAR K E A S T JUSTINOTRL KLINECIR AR B O R DAW N L N KETTLE CV FOR E S T R A N C H CORRIDORLOOPRD SUMTERGLADE AL A M O PKW Y WILDWOOD WAY HIRAM LN FIR E S T O N E DR S E R V I C E R D CIR C L E S T A R R D HILLOCKS C V CHESTNUTCLAYLN NATALIEWAY LASCIM A S D R PALMETTOPARK AR I Z P E R D CA RDINALDR PL A I N S M A N R O B I N W A Y CROCKETTCV ARMOURDR EA G L E D R R O B I N OA K S CLO UDY BR O O K L U B B O C K L N H A U S M A N WAY G ATE WAY P L A C E GOLFBALL GIB B S-S P R A W L R D BAPTIST HEALTH DR R I O MIS T D R NICHOL A S C V EMER SON PASS W H I T E W I N G JUNIPERLN WILDHOLW CA S TLE CLIMB S H O R T S T R K L N DEEPHAVEN DR MO U R NIN G DO VE FIR E S A G E DY K E S L N OA K N O R T H DR KIN Z ELCT TR E E TOP L N JA S O N S W A Y ER I C A LA M A R S T AV E N U E B TIER R A G R A N D E FLAGL E R B L V D PHANTOM CR K M O U N T C REST DR PIL O TPT DEEP SP RIN G PAS S LINDY H I L L S CHALKSTEM TH O M AS EDIS O N D R W I S T F U L T R L FO X G L O V E L N FAV E R O C V MA N D E L A N E DR PAR K LA N E C T STEVESAVE T R AIL VILLA G E D R S C O T C H R O S E L N S P R I N G T R E E FIEL D S P A R K L E P T B E NT W O O D P ASS W U ES T S T GLENCR O S S PITTS L N FIR S T S T W BL U E B E L L D R CAN D Y L N FOR E S T B R I A R JORDA N AER O A V E U N D ER WOODCT GREY FEATH ER LING L N PONY C ORRAL S A R A Z E N CT WINE GARDEN CREEKWOO D ST BETTYROBERTS APPELL A T E R I S E COV E R E D BR I D G E WINDINGBLOOM APPALOOSA PASS MID-CITIES PK W Y BRUSH TRAILBEND COV E B R OOK HAYCRAFTBLVD CAMARON WOODS LUD L O W TR L BALTUST R O L DR CHALK HILL CV TAMBUR O T R L KO E H L E R RD DRO W SEY AVE LINCOLNWO OD D R S I P P E L A V E W U R Z B A C H S T FALL I N G R I D G E D R MER I D I A N RO S EWOOD C V BOCA RATONDR REDRIVERBAY MITCHELL AV E TIR E S T E S MAIN ST H O LLIW ELL BRIDGE TESORO PERDIDO BO W S P RIT PIER CODY L N SKYCV HOR S E H O L W GOY A DAKOTA R UN W H I S P E R CV COPP E R CL I F F HA M I L T O N PL A C E RHONDADR SA N TA CLA R A ST TURTLEBACK D S T W BOLD CY P R E S S FOUR O A K S L N NAR R O W P A S S D R WHISPER K N OLL FISHERMAN PO RT SEC RETCV C OPPERKNOLL CEDAR BR I D G E HOR N E D LAR K HO R S E S H O E CV C H E STNUT CT BU R N I N G TR L EM ERALDPT G OLD EN MEAD OW S I L V E R T R E E BLV D CHU RUBUSCO D R HIGHLAND V W PARKMEADOW W I N D Y FAL K TATT N A L L CARDINALPT H O W ARD DR LEGEND R O C K W E T Z R D BR O O K OR C H A R D LIV E O A K CR O S S I N G PO RTROYALST LONGACR E CIR R U S CV R A I N Y B R O O K AS C E N D I N G PO R T S U N G L A D E R A N C H GALLANT RIDGEDR R O S E M A N BR I D G E ROUNDTREE D R EL M CT PE C A N HE R E F O R D S T DEERH O L W DUNCAN PL A C E MATH O M DR SHADOWTRL LITTLEOAKS S TA M S CIR S O R E N S T A M W A Y UNION C R E E K DR KITE CO R N E R FAR M V I E W S H O R T W E Y E L R D F R ESNO PLAC E AR M A D I L L O W A Y EBO N Y L N HERA D R G ARZA PLA C E B AY WILLOW T RAIL ST E M M E A D O W CR E E K D R KO C H INT E R M E Z Z O W A Y RANDOLPH AFB OL E A N D E R DR LAURELLN JUDS ONW OOD CO N C HO WAY DR ARCHE R S GR OVE BR O O K S AV E MES Q UITECR K ECHOTR L BANNO C KS DR Y E L L O W B A R K B L V D EAR H A R T LN W H I T E F I E L D EDITH FOREST CABIN STABLEVW FORESTELF C H E R RY BLO SSO M D R COY L N AU T U M N V W WOODLAKE PT GLENHAVENDR LEDFOR D LN HIGHLANDLAKE DR W A L D R D T A R R A N T T R L BA L A N C E D R O C K TIMBERTAP T RINIT Y T R L NEW A BACAL L W A Y M ES A BR O O K R I D G E C A N Y O N D R WIN D Y BROOK CA M P F I R E W A Y WE MBLEY CV INVERR A R YDR CHURCHILL AVE TR O T T E R T I M R A N C H CR K R A W H I D E W A Y LOST M E ADOWSDR CANOGA MEADOW DAK O TA BAY MIR A F L O R E S CA LLA W AY PARK WILL CLOUDESLEY IKE L N BR O O K W A Y RISINGSTAR M AR KET T R AIL S T A L L I O N PAS S CONNELL POND BRIDGE M O N T PLAC E BU N K E R S T OS A G E CIR CO L T S B A Y 3R D S T W SPIRALWOODS HAVENMEADOWDR AB BEVILLEDR GLEN L A R K W A R A D M I R A L MAPLE TREERD MEA D E S T LAZ Y DIA MOND PAT R O N VIL LAG E W O O D E D TR L LA U R A H T S W O O D DUC K 4TH S T W BR O K E N AR R O W BL A C K W A L N U T BRINWOOD E W R I G H T B L V D DAIS Y D R GLENCR O F T OAKMONT DOW N S E LINDBER G H B L V D HINGEIR O N BINZ-ENGLEMA N R D GR A N I T E FIEL D TR A N Q U I L V W PUMPKINR D G KR I E R V W R U N N I N G HOLW PR I C H A R D PL A C E GLEN LAKE ROCKYSHOALS CLAY RIDGEDR CL E A R R I D G E D R HOL L O W OAK OAKW OODLN S U M A C C I R VALONA DR OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D M O O NLIGHT C T SHALLOWBANK BL O S S O M CT IV Y J E T RID GE PEAK D R BUS I N E S S CIR S O R R E L L L N LIBE R T Y V W BUS I N E S S CT BAR R E N R I D G E D R S H A D O W C R E S T DR PAL O M I N O CANY O N BR E M E R S T R AN G E R OAK DA NIE L D R FOREST BRIDGE HER O N FLATS CES S N A L N MAIN S T T R O UT RID G E D R FO REST BO W OAK DALE GATE CR E E K L N LO C K WOODL N E S E G U I N S T IV Y F I E L D ROBINCV GY P S Y C V JAS M I N E D R FALLEN PINE WOLFPRAIRIE MT LAUREL FOR E S T D A W N CIN NABAR TRL GAV E L G A T E ME D I A T O R P A T H HARTCREST PLACE AVERY RD MIDA S PAR K V A L L E Y D R N E W COMBE DR TEN AC A TR L R I D G E NOR T H D R DO U B L E DIAM O N D JULEP CHAS E BEL G R A V E W A Y FOR E S T A S H CR E E K V I E W OAKS HADLE Y RUN G UADA CO M A DR SPRINGTREECLIFF GAT E W O O D OA K S DOUGLASFIR DR FOREST CROSSING JONQUILL EAS T E R N FINCH FLINTR O C K W A Y NORCRESTDR HOLLE RING PASS B LACK O AKDR G S T W WILLO WS RAN C H BARNSWALLOW KIS E R L N BERE A N WAY CH A S E F I E L D DR NOR T H C U T T R E S A C A G S T E M A D R O N E DR HAR P E R V A L L E Y D R CO P P E R R O C K CREEKRD GO O S E N W A Y WIN DY RID G E TRL OAK R USH QUEBECDR AS H L E Y S W A Y W I L D CR E S T PR A I R I E BEND SH A DY MEADO W S LN COPPE R S TREA M ALA M O D E R BY BR O OK MEADO W BRAMBLE W O O D CIR W L E G I O N D R ME A D O W OR E PIGEONBER R Y S O U T H L A N D AV E FR I E N D S W O O D PATH WIN D Y PT RUSSWOOD CIR ABBOTSBU R Y SONNYRDG LIG U R I A D R POPLA R AV E LUNDYSLN AV E N U E D DOV E H I L L C HER O KE E WIN DS LAS ALLE PL A CE S U G A R C R E E KST IL I A D PECAN HTS S U NSET SUM MIT OAK R D G ME A D O W S A G E CE N I Z O S P G CANHAMRANCH GOL D E N W A Y HANS O N S FOR E S T KER R Y IVYJEAN P O R TOFINO PLACE WESTCREEK D E E R MEA D O W HULLST LILACHILL GO L D E N O A K T R L GLEN CAS T L E HEY N I S S O U T H S P R I N G T R E E S H A D O W CY N T H I A AV E N U E F D O MINGUEZ LN S U N D E W L N OVER LO OK DR HICKORY LN GAR D E N SH O OT DIS C OVERY RIS E GARDEN RID G E D R GLENAR B O R DE STIN Y ACRES RIP P LE WA Y PAINT E D TR A C K S B E LG R A VIAFO R E ST HALF MOO NDR GUY GUISBOR NE PENNY PKWY LONGHOR N W A Y GOLDEN R O D CV BLOSSO M BLF JO D Y H TS MEADOWDAWNDR NORMAN CV HAPPY T RL CABALL O R U N SLEEPYTRL AV E N U E G OS A G E T R L DA P P L E DR SP LITRO CKLN CALABRIA MAYFAIRDR MEADOWFAWNDR LEE C O R ALTRL R U I D O S O R A L L Y OA KKN O B W I L L O W C R K BLOSSOM CRK W HIS P E R P T CO P P E R C V ALTGELT L N CIPR I A N I W A Y DOUBLEROCK MATS O N MANO R TH O R N T O N L N W I L L O W O A K CHLO E D R R E D CEDAR C V LINDEN GR O V E D R VAN NES T CIR SOCRATESLN NA F T A C I R CR I M S O N COV E D R AR R O Y O S I E R R A DEN N I S J U P E D R TR EELIN E A CRES VERANO D R GRAND FOREST DR S E C O N D D R E GLOX I N I A D R FLA GST O N E D R CO N C H O PAS S AR R O Y O DE L S O L S T E E R L N MAR E W A Y BERRY KNOLLDR VIVIANDR WOLFRUN TUR N E R R D G MAIDMARIAN GLENBR O O K AR R O Y O DO R A D O INDIAN BL F GLE N P O S T ELV I R A A V E KR UEGER R DG S U N D E W CR K BERRY TRACE OLD TOEPPER W E I N R D GR E E N T R E E DR RIDGE FLOWER CHURCHILL CV CA B A L L O V A L L E Y LIG H T H O US E DR AEGE A NW A Y FISHPOND RD LUNEVILLELN ANGUSW A Y B ATTLE LAKE WIST O RIA C T W RIG H T L A NDING CORSICA D R COPPE R ST O NE EASTERN CLOUDS OBBLIGATO LN ARROYOSECO MT LA U R ELLN S ENIO R CIR SHININGGLOW W SEGUINST D O RISDR AV I A T I O N A V E KR A M E R P K W Y N ACOGDOCHES L OOP BERRYPATCH GLADY S AV E S A D D L E CANY O N MYRTLE RUN PR E S T O N T R L R U N N I N G BR O O K INDIANHILLS C HESTNUTGATEDR SKYL I NE RIDGEDR HARVE S T R D G PR I M R O S E MYSTERY R D G MISTYFIELDDR DO W M A N S T D EER CANYON D R HEASLEY PLACE BILTMORELAKES TAR LACDR LANDMAR K GATE W W E T Z S T CR E S T B L F BO W I E S KN O L L R I D G E BEACH DR W K L E I N S T ECH O RIDGE D R FEATHE RLN O W L W O O D S V I C T O R I A N CIR CO L E T T E L N 1S T S T W AUGUS T A GLADE ELKTRL TAG LN CUB D R BU B BLIN G SPRIN G S R D CED A R B R U S H R D SA H M P ASS DEER R U N AS T E R C I R DUSTY EMERALD REDOAKCV REBELGROVEDR KINGS M A N S T BIR C H S T SP RIN G T REE TRL AZAL E A C I R AUTUMNFALL BR O O K S H I R E LIBER T Y R D DR E A M A V E MEADOWGR E E N CO T T O N S P I N D L E PINE MEAD O W D R SUMACCV M OSSRID GE LARMONACV VONDELPARK C ALLEYCIR HAR R I S O N OAKS COR R I D O R OAKS GR A N I T E W O O D S RU NA W A Y CRO W N H OLLY FO RES T TR O T T I C V BL U E M O O N GAIT COR R I D O R P K W Y MU S K O G E E BEN D LE M O N W O O D A V E SCOUT P T MIS SIO N HILLS DR FL O R E N C E GR O V E BE E C H W O O D A V E H EY NIS N ORTH S C O T T A V E BL U F F S I D E B L V D MARATHON PASEO C OR TO D R DEA RBO R N DR POIN T E LO O P WOOD L A N D C V FO X L N APAC HECIR IV Y D O V E OL D E N G E L R D NATUR E P AT H HILL L N GOL D E N R O D L N C AN DLEBE R RY D R CHESTNUTMANORDR P RIVATE DR S A F E H A R B O R ALTAMIRANO IVYHORN STE E P V A LL E Y EC H O L N MISTYARBOR DEL L L N FAIR L N Y O R K L N EDENGR O V E D R S C H U E T Z D R S P Y G L A S S TIAR A D R AL B R E C H T L N CEDA RWINDSDR MCHENRY DR IVYFLOWER W I L L O W L O O P 6TH S T W AYALAL N LY R I C L N ME E K S T CORONARDG DOW N I N G S T TURTLE DOVEDR POR T A G E L N OR C H A R D GL E N AS H L N W I L L O W W I S P R D GL E N N L N F U RLONG TIGERMEADOW BETH A N Y DR D A GAMA D R WINDVIEWWAY BLUE GOOSE CE D A R L N CHENEY R D PO P L A R G R O V E L N ROVEENTRL GLENHILL SPRINGTRE E G ROVE TRONAMINE I S T W LAKE HIGHLANDS OL I V E A V E V I S T A D E L R E Y SUNS HINE TOWE R D R LUCILL E PVTRDAT 9275WEICHOLDRD Y O U N G A V E IV Y J A D E KISSENAPARK FIFTH S T PRIZEDPONY BALDWIN PARK BRINSONCT R H O D I U S L N MA R T I N E Z PAS S ADR I ATIC FOREST PATH BORMANNDR MOUNTAINHOME CRISTOBAL D R BIR C H B E N D GR O V E PL A C E SEASCAPELN UPPER S E G U I N R D MEA D O W S T O N E R A L E I G H D R A N D ERSONCT MEA D O W PEAK CHR I S T I A N S TEE MAS O N C R K ME A D O W DAL E WINDWAY CRK DE R B Y R A L L Y RO UND ROCK W AY COPPER ME ADOW PARK LANE DR BEXARBOWLING IH 10 W R A M P L AZYACRESLN LA W R E N C E L N G O LDEN R O D CIR S T A N U S H R D MEA D O W W A Y EL B E L R D SPRIN G TREE LN HOGAR T E N PAR K EL MONTEBLVD BET H PA G ECT FAIRVIEWDR DAN C I N G AV A S Z 0 2 S E R V I C E R D SEN N A HILLS DR CINNAMON TEAL SHERRIDR S C O T S E L M R O Y A L D R TU RNBERRY DR FOXRUN TR A N Q U I L L O W A Y S C O R D A T O DR CONCER T O DR NO R T H M E A D O W CO P P E R S I D E K N OLLW O O D GLEN CV VILLADR BLAZING STAR TRL SPANISHOAKDR CEL T I C AS H R U N CL Y D E S D A L E S T W S C H A E F E R R D COMANCHETR L CL A P B O A R D R U N W I N T E R R D G Q U A R T E R M A R E GREN A D A G AIT ERSTEIN VALLEY AP P ALO OSA R U N FALL E N TR A I L D R CY L B U R N PAR K D R SHADOWCREEKLN B E NT B R O O KDR W A R R I O R TR L VALENCIA R O YAL H O R S E BAR K E R CY P R E S S MEA D O W H I L L S TARCIR TUR Q U O I S E MU N T J A C S T S E C O N D S T W W E S T E R N TR A I L D R SOUTHERN RIDGE DR MONIC A S CRK S E C O N D D R W BOW R I N G PAR K SILVER ROSE FIR S T D R E FIR S T D R W SECLUDED DR FAUL K N E R D R S E C O N D S T E THIR D S T E C O O L SANDSDR S H A D O W LAW N C I R C HELSEAPLAC E PVT R D AT F M 482 REDMANPASS BRANDYWINE CV PESA C V BLACK B UCK ENCHANTED OAKS NOTCH LEAF AUDUBON PAR K S A D D L E H I L L H ENRY F O R D DR PETE R S O N L N S T A N D I N G OAKS NATUR E T R L GLENBORO APAC H E R D G TATE L N H A M P T ON HILL S S T E R L I N G W A Y UNIONSHOALS SCARLET TANGER S E L M A P K W Y LE GISLATIONDR BUR K W O O D L N S U R N ADPLA CE HUN T E R O A K S AND O RRA DR BRANDIN GTRL SPRINGTRE E RUN S H E R L O C K L N RID G E P O R T D R COLUMBIARIDGEDR BA Y M E A D O W SST T WIN P OINT C R K GLENHAR T SNO WY EGRET IR A D R GREE NGRANT BR A N N O N L N CELESMEADOW W ILDTRACE W H I S P E R O A K WOMANHOLLERINGRD MUS T A N G MEADOW ELM DR OAKBREEZE ABIGAIL ALCAN FOR S U N F L O W E R S T INDIAN BLANKETST GLEN MANOR WILLO W B R A N CH COPPER TR A I L D R B OAT M A N PIER CONV E R S E CENTER BAS S F A R M R D BAUGH LN LA J O L L A TEAKW O O D D R K LEIN CIR S M O K E Y C R K M A NNINGTONPLACE R I C H M O N D PAR K AS S E M B L Y C I R TR U M B A L CALE DR TIF FAN Y LN W O L F F V I S T A SCHMIDT-C RAFT LN PACE R L N STRAIG HT LN MAR B E L L A CO M A N C H E R D G W E S T E R L Y P L A C E CR E E K S I D E D R GAR D E N MEADOW P VT R D AT 15497LO OKO UT RD CHESTNUTCEDARDR FALCON CR O S S I N G IO L A S W A Y HIDDENFAW N MEADOW S K Y MEADOW V W BR I A R F I E L D CR I M S O N TR E E CAST A N O CV CHESTNUT CAPEDR MINERALSWAY CR E S T W O O D DR MADR I D D R GR E E N BL U F F D R S U N R O S E L N S A D D L E V I S T A CAL L A L I L Y MISTY CV GUL F S T AUTUMN DAW N BR O K E N S P U R Y U C C A P A R K CAS T L E H I L L DR BRAES CORNER GALLANT F O X D R D O V ETRAILDR BU CKB O A R D LN S A N A U G U S T I N E BL V D MIS T Y A S H KING L N BARK W O OD KAY L A L N PAINTED R I D G E D R CR O S S P L A I N S SZ01 SE RVIC E RD R O C K Y T R L G R E Y S O T O L WAY W I L L O W CR E S T MEADOW R U E STO NEY BROOK DR S E C O N D S T Y E A G E R C I R PINECONECV CE D A R G A P CALE R A CV FR E A D L N SIERRAPA SS BOLER I O D R COPPER BROO K FL O R E S L U N A R D PL A Z A D R CAMPUSDR IR O L A D R CA B A N A D R LITTLE S U G A R C R K KEYWINDYWAY HUIS A C H E H I L L S T R OLLINGLN R O B I N D R BR I S B A N E R I V E R SUTH ERLUN LN LIMESTONE MILLDR DEL A I N E P A R K COPPERKETTLE EL M S T CAR M E L D R A PPAL O OSA OAK H O R SE B RID GE CLEARW OOD PATH HANGING MOS S D R R O C K COV E L N MUS T A N G V W IVY MISTY MASONVALLEY DE E R G A R D E N C V HAS TINGSPA R K LENOWAY KURR E WAY Q U A K E R R D G NE M E C L N CE D A R C A V E R N G ALLO PIN G OA K SPRING WILLO W NOMAD LN TO M M Y T R A I L DR R O X A N N E L N O M A R D R SHAY P A S S BULW A R K P E A K RIV ER BROOK DR V A L L E Y M E A D O W LEADINGOAKS HAR B O U R T O W N RACEWAY DO W N S W HISPER FIELD CACTUS P A T C H CANSIGLIO KEL I W A Y BR O O K B E N D R E N E E D R S H ADY OAKLN TU R F W A Y P A R K KILGOR E D R R H O D E D R FAR L E Y D R MAL D E N D R HEAV E NLY VW TOR O N T O D R INTER L A C H E N BU C K S K I N W A Y PIPE S T O N E PR A I R I E V I S T A R O S E G A T E D R BO R W I C K L N BEA U F O R T B L V D BR I S B A N E D R BL U E S K Y R D LA Z Y O A K D R BEL L I S T E R S T KUS M I E R Z R D C ST E LAIN E S S C HLAT HER P K W Y SWINDOW CIR S U T T E R S M I N E TARRANT H ILL PO S E Y P A S S PARTHENONPLACE THOR E A U T R L MC C O Y L N MEADOW T O P BR O W A R D A V E ELDORADO SUNLIT T R AILDR J O S H S W A Y PETUNIA AV E N GR A Y T O W N R D W HIS PE RIN G OAKS E G L I N GTO N W AY FLINTS T O N E L N P ATH FIN D E R GINS B E R G D R LIM ES T O N E MESA LEDGEBR O O K D R FAIR I N G T O N D R R U S T I C T R L LINCOL N V I L L A G E D R NUGGET CR K STEA R M AN L N W I L L O W TOP DR TUS A Y A N I S T C E N T E R FLO WERTRL W H I T E T A I L P A S S M C M O R RIS BLVD CAS C A D E R I D G E D R S C H R A N K O A K S R O N R D WISHING OAKS WAY ANTIQ U E O A K D R GAV E L D R EN C H A N T E D F A R M INDIAN M O U N D SEARIMDR TAP W O O D L N BR O O K S T O N E DAKOTA R I V E R RED H O R SE PARK BUCKHEADLN MUNICIPAL PKWY DU S T Y L N CIBOLODR NOTTIN GSHIRE COTTONTAIL LN S I L O S T FAW N P A S S S A D D L E B A C K T R L COTTON PATCH LAU R E L CAN Y ON DR FA W N D R S A M A NTHA D R ES K I M O F O R E S T KR I E W A L D L N ST A G H O R N MILL SAHARASTONEDR MEY E R S A V E O AKMARSH T R L R I D G E M O O N BOUL D E R D R ANTL E R D R S C H M U C K S R D SPRIN G T REEBLF ODY S S E Y D R M A X F L I D R GR EAVES LN IH35S RAMP HANA L N HIDDEN OAKTRL DIAMOND FAL L S RITABLANCAST PEACH L N DUKE W A Y DR CL E A R B R O O K A V E SHOWD O W N P ATH S N A K E W E E D D R ING L E W O O D D R FAW N R D G K E S T RE L OAK FO U N T A I N G A T E EA G L E S G L E N N R A L S T O N D R QUIETM OONDR REDIRON MICHELLEHILL HILL S I D E E S T A T E S FOR T W A Y N E BR U C K S D R MONTANIO DR W H I S P E R B L F AUTUMN V A L L E Y M A R GIE'SLN W H I S P E R H A V E N TR I T O N GR A N D K I D L N COUNTR Y V W CIBOLO TOL L E R D BL U E F O R E S T D R S C H N E I D E R D R GRIMCHESTER D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PAWTUCKET R DWINDINGTRL LEGACYOAKS P K WY AMBR O S I O L N JAMIE S U E D R BU FF ALO DR ER N A D R BR I D G I T D R DEBOR A H D R NEW B E R L I N R D GR E E N M E A D O W D R BEV E R L Y D R LOR I L Y N N D R FOSS M EADOW ZODIAC DR CH E Y E N N E B L F PECAN DR W I L L I A M S B U R G D R BOX E R P A S S D R CAVERN O A K R I C H M O N D D R GETTY S B U R G D R ANDREWS A VE R O S E W O O D D R CH E R O K E E R D G E OTTO S T S I O U X C I R CORALMEADOW M U S T A N G V A L L E Y JO N S W A Y HARVE ST CREST MIL L E R L N W ALNUT MILLDR R I F L E G A P R O S E L N R E D O A K T R L CEDARBRAN C H L O U A N N D R PIER S O N L N OA K L A N E D R BUL L D O G D R NORTHLAKEPASS PFEIL R D GAL I C I A AR A N D A L N S A G E D R COMMER C I A L P L A C E BECK S T TEAKW O O D L N S U M A C L N FAL C O N D R DW L N IH 35 N R A M P BR A C K E N C R E E K D R A U T U M N H O L W H A RVEST V W W UNLESLN CHAR L E S T O N S T A P P E R R D MICKESCH LN FAR M V I E W L N TATE S D R FOX B R I A R L N GLEAMIN G SPRINGS D R MARTINE Z-CONVERSE W I M B L E D O N D R CRES C E NT BE N D D R TEX A S V A L L E Y INDUS T R I A L D R W A R E - S E G U I N L O O P MO O N L I G H T M E A D O W S D R CEDAR C R EEKDR OAKS I D E BON A N Z A L N LAKEVIEWD R PVTRD ATSCHUETZDR CAFFEY R D CL E A R O A K AP G L N PVT RDATCOYOTERUN HIGH OAK BR I S B A N E W I N D Y M E A D O W S D R HILL B R O O K R D DAV I D L A C K B L V D CONCOR D I A L N DEBBIE DR DOR E E D R BEN E K E I T H W A Y HOMESTEAD DR CIN C H O NA T R L TONNEDRW OPIE LN DEN-OTT HILL B E LL NORTHDR TRIPLEL LN JETHR O L N E S C H A E F E R R D TAIL D R A G G E R L N EBER T R D HAECKER F I E L D S FR O B O E S E L N HU B E R T U S R D S C H N EIDERL N WILDH O RSE PAS S P VT S T AT ENGEL R D S K Y L O O P CATTLEMANSLN NO R - T E X D R S T O L T E A C R E S BEY E R P A T H GERDES RD S PERIMETER RD RETAMAPKWY OLDGRAYTO WN RD PV T W P E R I M E T E R R D WEST P ARK S O U TH PAR K BRIC KELL RD GATE W A Y B L V D FLATSTONE PASS FIFTH S T E WASHINGTONCIR KINGS W A Y R O B I N G A T E OL D C I M A R R O N T R L NORTHW E S T THRUWAY S C H U M A N N R D N EVANSRD OLDSPANISHTRL DOUGHBOYCIR CO L U M B I A ST A N D RE W S INNEROCTAGON PHOENIX A VE BOLTON R D C OCONUTPALM OUTEROCTAG O N PARK O FFICE AU TU M N R U N LN FOREST HOLW WIL D E R N E SS T R L MAIN CIR RYDE N D R O AK M O N T W A Y FM2252 TR I - C O U N T Y P K W Y C H ELSE A CIR PERSIM MON DR MORNINGGROVE G REYCLIFFDR COVERED WAG ON FE R R Y S A G E D R R U S C H LN FAIR W A Y S D R WELCOMEDR BRUSH CREEK DR VIC T O RIAPT BEECH TR L LONECYPR ESS AUTU M N FLOW E R TIVOLI G A R DENS AUTUM N BR O O K CHIC K A S A W B L F BENT TREE DR AZA L E A WA Y PEBBLEBEACH CHESTNUT BAR R GR E E N R I D G E SERENERIDGEDR LIEC K S T CO P P E R G A T E Y E L L O W W O O D DR MUS T A N G CANY O N S P I C E O A K L N TR E E BR A N C H CU R L I N G P O S T DOVE MEADO WS MO S S HO L L O W C T W O O D L A K E V W TEXASPALM DR TILDENTRL S H A W N E E B L F A M E RICAN FLAG COMANC H E P A S S FEATHERSTONEDR OAK BL O O M TIM BER ROSE D R R E D R O C K P A S S IRONMILLCRK G OLF R D BUCKIN G H A M VILLAGEST GR EE N W O O D MAIDENWAY DEERMEADOW BLVD AZTECWAY W I N D B U R N TR L S P R I N G T R E E P K W Y L O F T E D LE A F MOUNT OLYMPUS R H I N E L A N D D R PEPPER T R L CO M M U N I T Y D R BUC K S C I R FORRES T TRL TU R N B E RRY WAY EVERETT LOOP INDIAN CIR C O M AN C H E PATH LON G HO R N RID GE DR VISTA FAIRWAY BAT CA V E R D FIEL D B E N D G RASS H OLLO W DR HIDDENHILL S N AS H L E Y O A K D R ANTIETAMDR W HITN E Y W A Y BATCAVE LOOP CO R T E S DR ROBINH OOD WAY HING E L O O P CHE RRY T REE DR TR A N Q U I L L N STO R M KING S C E N I C V I S T A IH35S A C C ESS R D SPLINTERED O A K LU C K SIDE KRIERCT PE V E R O JA N E TLN BR A N C H I N G PEAK V A L L E Y O A K Q U E E N V I C T O R I A D R SH AD O W YDUSK CANARY MEADOWDR COPPER MESA BENTBRIDGEDR C H E R O K E EBLV D PINT O CR K CO P P E R L A K E MAPLE M E A D OWDR D OLLY DR R AF BU R N ETTE MACARTHURWAY MIS S I O N CR K G OLLST ANDERSON CHASE R EDIR O N C R K MIS T Y M E A D O W CANYO NOAK DIANA DR R I D G E M I L E OL D H A M CL I F F LAND MARK PARK CHERRYGLADE STERLINGMANOR MUSTANGRDG DIS C O V ERYDR MEADOWLARK PVTSTAT ARMYRESIDENCE SPRUCE RIDGE D R BELFORT PT FALCONMEADOW RIO VISTADR BAY T H O R N E COAST RIDGE D R OLDEVANS RD JA M E S AGEED R TRUMPETCIR COMANCHECIR PEACHTREELN DIX O N R I D G E D R GUNTHERG R O V E HABERSHAM S H AL L O W R D G PON D APPL E BRENDA DR LODGEP O L E LN S A N D H I L L D R W A G O N T R A I N ENCANTO P OIN T D R FIR S T S T E SHINING E L K CHIPPEW A B L V D S BEYERST KENTUCKY R D G SUNCLIFF D R R I D G E EL M DRY CANYONTRL FRANKSRD B E N T MEADOWDR GR O V E P A R K B S T HANOV E R S K Y BEL M E D E C T V A L H A L L A AS H DR W A Y W A R D P A S S DEMETE R LL O Y D S P A R K JANE ADDAMSDR CAR D I F F FAR M V I E W L O O P NLOOP 1604 EACCESS RD PFANNSTIELLN FM 3009 AC C E SS RD MATHO M LANDING DEDEKE DR IVY MO ON QUIET NIGHTLN SILVER FO X LEGEND POINTDR FARWEST DR V A G A B O N D L N VIJIL LO OP FR A N K B A U M D R M E D U S A UL Y S S E S W E S T O N R D R O T H B E R G E R W A Y TR O PHY OAKSDR REGAL OAKSD R GR E E N B R O O K PL A C E NOR T H V I E W DR MEADOW AR B O R CO V E R S C V STLOUISWAY S N O W G O O S E HICKORY BE N D TONKAWA PASS R A NDOLPH PLAZADR CO V ENTRY COVED R ABACCUS CT IH 10 E A C CE SS R D P O RTRUSH LN SEAWILLOW DR R O YAL T R OONDR K A U RIC LIFFS CL I F F S I D E D R R E B A C RAR Y MEAD O W TORREY PIN E S ZEPHYR CV AUTUMN WELLS BOENIGDR VASSOVW JE S SES CIR SELDON TRL WINDSOCKLN B R OOK LINE PARKVIEW DR HILL S I D E TW I N S A D D L E S ROCKR U N BIR C HW O O D CIR S A N DY RIDGE CIR BU FFALO PLA C E D RY W OOD RANCH MYRTLE GLADE R H E A S T SERVICEDRN O 1 W LA G U N AHILLS FR E U D E N B U R G R D BISMARCKLAKE S T O N E G A T E D R R I D G E MIS T D R MONTE SA C T ROBBINS GLADE SILV E R TE R RA CE NE W N I N G RU BENSDR HANSEL HTS UNIONTER R A C E GR E E N HER O N PUTTER COP P E R MO U N T A I N PVTRDAT 9305WEICHOLDRD ESTRIDTRL ABB E Y R D DAULTON RDG SERENEHILLS SWIFTLN M AIDSTONE CV CANTU R A M I L L S PEG ASUSDR VILLAGEGREEN GR E E N V A L L E Y L O O P FLATLANDTRL JO U R N E Y S W A Y C OY OTE R U N HA M P T O N PA R K CHE RRY HILL R V D R 1STA VE W KINGOAKS DR SPANISH OAK W E S T W A Y D R E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N GUADALUPE DR HILLV I E W D R FO X F OR D RUN D R CORINTH CO R P O R A T E D R FAIRVIE WCIR FLAMINGR I D G E D R NIKE CIR W A G O N W H E E L PA W L I N D R GAN D E R PAR K SH A DY CREEK L N MONMOUTH LEVESQUE LN ARCHER BLVD TRAPPERSRDG APA C H E B E N D DE W D R O P L N BR I S B A N E BEND O RO VIE JO CT MARGARITA HILL JANOE LN VIA POSADADR PINE V A L L E Y D R OCE A N M E A D O W DU S T Y R D G MARBAC H LN Q U A I L W O O D R U N COLDMOUNTAIN DAVIELN TW I S T E D O A K S A G R D S C E N I C H I L L L N BRUSH TRAILLN CREEK L OOP BL A C K S M I T H W A Y T R AILIN GOAKS BIE DIGERLN OUTLAWBEND PIG AL L E Y BLUEPT CIBOLO BEND VOGESPASS VIGILANTETRL S C E N I C L A K E D R PARKDR CATTLE C R E EK LN SA N TA CL ARA LO O P CAR R A N Z A L N BETHANY W A Y GARDENOAKS D R AR R O W O O D PLACE COMMUNITYCIR ME S Q U I T E W O O D S S T A L L I O N L N ULTRALIG HT RD RIOCIBOLO WAY HOL M A N R D STE P H ENS LN NPERIMETERRD EPERIM ETE R RD AUTUMN AR C H PAR K L N IV Y L N HIGHGATE R D W A G O N R D R EAL R O CK R D TALKENHOR N FORESTWATERSCIR LEWISRANCHRD PVT S T AT THE F O R U M IH 35N ACCESSRD PVTSTATTHE FORUM 0 ½1 1½2¼Miles BexarCounty GuadalupeCounty ComalCounty R ural Frontage S ector Boundary Air Installation Impact Air Installation Compatible Civic, S chools Main S treet Commercial Commercial Campus Highway Commercial Industrial Industry, Technology and R and D Parks, Open S pace Agricultural Conservation Estate Neighborhood S ingle Family R esidential Multi-Family R esidential Manufactured Housing Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Core TND/TOD Transition 1% Annual-Chance Flood Event ComprehensiveL and Use Plan S chertz Municipal Boundary S chertz ETJ Boundary County Boundaries R ailroads Major R oads Minor R oads Proposed R oads Air InstallationCompatible Use Zone APZ I APZ II Clear Zone“The City of S chertz provides this Geographic Information S y stem product "as is" without any express or impliedwarranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.In no event shall The City of S chertz be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connectionwith the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or ty pographical errors. Periodicalchanges may be made and information may be added to the information herein. The City of S chertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s)described herein at any time.” Last Update: February 20, 2018 City of S chertz, GIS Coordinator: Tony McFalls, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1184 APPENDIX 2 - ZONING MAP PVT F M 482 E P E RIM E T E R R D C R EE K R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM E TE R R D W E T Z R D W E S T O N R D G O L F R D G E R D E S R D ST O LT E R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P AT H E L B E L R D LOOP 539 E O PIE L N F M 7 8 N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR B UNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E T TE T RIPLE L LN H U B E R T U S R D S TA P P E R R D F R O B O E S E L N VOGES PASS FM 78 EAST OLD N A C O G D O CHES R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 2252 S C H W A B R D W EIR R D ABBEY RD D O E R R L N FA W N D R C A L E D R RETAMA PKWY MILL E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R L O O K O UT R D M A S K E R D SC H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A LLE Y R D PIP E S T O N E ARIZPE RD T O L L E R D B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D GIN R D K RIE W AL D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D S M AIN S T W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 7 8 WE F M 1 51 8 N MIDAS WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N A C CESS R D KIS E R L N FM 1516 N H A E C K E R VILLE R D W A L D R D F M 2 5 3 8 T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A N TA C L A R A R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D FF S T E EVANS RD W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D CIN N A B A R C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N F M 225 2 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D FM 482 FM 78 E FM 482 W EIL R D W EIL R D W EIL R D W E IR R D B U N K E R S T F M 22 52 F M 2 2 52 W EIL R D F M 300 9 F M 78 P F A N N S TIEL L N PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N FM 482 H A E C K E R VILL E R D S T O LT E R D W E TZ R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 3 0 09 SCHOENTHAL RD F M 2252 B O LT O N R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 482 E N G E L R D B O LT O N R D FM 2538 FM 78 PFEIL RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D ZUEHL RD E FM 1 51 8 N F M 3009 COYOTE RUN A RIZ P E R D FM 78 FM 22 5 2 IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 1103 W EIL R D W E TZ R D F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D F M 4 8 2 T O L L E R D F M 3009 M A RIO N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2538 IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 22 52 E F M 151 8 N IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 1103 E FM 1518 N FIFT H S T E FM 78 W FM 482 F M 4 8 2 FM 78 N ABBOTT RD IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D N A B B O T T R D FM 78 B U N K E R ST F M 3 009 F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 FM 482 HAECKERVILLE RD FM 482 F M 3009 F M 78 W LOW ER SE G UIN R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D D E A N R D F M 3009 FM 78 Legend Municipal_Boundary ETJ Schertz City Limit City_of_Schertz_Zoning_Districts Agricultural District Apartment/Multi-Family Residential Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) Garden Home (Zero Lot Line) General Business General Business II Main Street Mixed Use Manufactured Home Parks Manufactured Home Subdivision Manufacturing (Heavy) Manufacturing (Light) Neighborhood Services Office and Professional Planned Development Pre-Development Public Use Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential/Agricultural Two-Family Residential Major Thoroughfares Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220804_Schertz_Zoning_Districts.mxd City of Schertz Zoning Map .8/4/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 2 APPENDIX 3 - 30 YEAR POPULATION DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 4 82 IH 35 S E F M 1518 N F M 2252 F M 2538 IH 1 0 W F M 1103 L O W E R S E G UIN R D FM 10 4 4 GIN R D M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A LL E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 16 04 N PVT B O LT O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 F M 78 W B AT C A V E R D W A L D R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D MILL E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D KIT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W EIL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V ALL EY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L RIC H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A EFE R R D S C H W A B R D F M 465 M O R N IN G SID E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZP E R D E EVANS RD S T A P P E R R D WIE D E R S T EIN R D B EECH TR L T O L LE R D D E A N R D PF A N N S TIEL L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D ATH E NIA N WIE D N E R R D S C H M O E K EL R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D TOEPPER W EIN RD OLD N AC O G D O CHES R D FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N BIN D S EIL L N R K L N N EVANS RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M BI A M AIN S T W P E RIM E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O LD WIE D E R STEIN R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O DL A N D O A K S D R M ARBAC H LN G O LF R D PHOENIX AVE H A LLIE H T S O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N DE D E K E D R DIE TZ R D W ES T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D GIB B S -S P R A W L R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D FIFT H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T A LT O N B LV D KIS E R L N N E W B E R LIN R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M IC H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZAR PKW Y O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER L N SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N HIL L S D R T U R NIN G ST O N E H O L LY L N F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD RIP PLE W AY GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A IN CIR W E L C O M E D R NOR-TEX DR C IB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE AG R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S C HU L Z ST HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E W IL D H O R S E PA S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREE K DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING RI D G E L IN E R D TRIPLE L LN WILLOW DR BLAZIN G STA R T RL ABBEY RD CEN TE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N EID E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D COVE RS CV C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC WIL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG H LA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T ALLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R J OR DAN H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M EADO W DR E KLEI N S T B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR ROSE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S TIC E L N S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W AYSPRINGTREE B LF PIG A L LE Y E A G L E D R S T AT E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U NLES LN J O N S W AY 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R AY C O R B E TT D R MAYFAIR HING E L O OP E L M ST TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RAMP P RIC K L Y P E A R D R L O M A VISTA ST KEY WEST WAY U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR MEDUSA H O PE L N FM 78 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E TZ R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD IH 1 0 W IH 35 N I H 1 0 E W EIL R D W E TZ R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H AECKER VILLE RD N G R AYTO W N R D IH 35 N I H 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 25 38 F M 2252 I H 1 0 W F M 1103 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G UIN R D GIN R D F M 1 0 44 M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N VA L L E Y R D C R EE K R D E L O O P 1604 N IH 35 N ACCES S R D PVT B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 FM 78 W B AT C A V E R D MILL E R R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W EIL R D KITT Y H A W K R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O VALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U LL RIC H R D S C H A E F E R R D SCHWAB RD F M 465 C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A RIZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD S T A P P E R R D M O R N IN G SID E D R WIE D E R S T EIN R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D PFA N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D AT HENIAN WIE D N E R R D E EVANS RD SC H M O E K E L R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NAC O G DOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD BIN D S EIL L N C O L U M B IA TO EPPER W EIN R D BEECH TRL M AIN S T W PERIM E TE R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BISO N LN M ARBAC H L N DIET Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D DEDEKE DR FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K ST N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G OTHIC D R FF S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W MIC H E L S O N L N GI B B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A PLE D R LAZAR PKWY N E W B E R LIN R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R DEN RID G E D R S WATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N HIL L S D R TU R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A IN CIR N O R-TEX DR CIB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O YA L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S CR E EK LO O P R A F B U R N E TT E AG R D E S CH ULZ S T HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDA R CREEK DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING TRIPLE L LN SI E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R TRL ABBEY RD C E NTE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A TE D R S C H N EID E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV CA F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG H LA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T STA LLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E T T E L N D R A Y T O N JO R D A N H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y MEADO W D R E K L E IN ST B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR RO SE L N P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E FLIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N W AG ON CROSSING V E R A N O D R S A D D LE H O R N W A YSPRINGTREE B LF PIG A L L E Y E A G LE D R S T A T E B LV D BRACKEN DR W UNLES L N JO N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN B LAZE M O ON R A Y C O R B E TT D R M AYFAIR H IN G E LO O P E L M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RAMP S T A C K S T O N E P RIC K LY P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR WIN GE D FO O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W EIL R D IH 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W ETZ R D IH 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G SF O R D R D IH 1 0 W FM 78 WE FM 1518 N IH 35 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R A YTO W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C KERVILLE R D Legend ETJ Population 2020 0 - 300 301 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 7,000 7,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 13,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Population 2050 0 - 300 300 - 1000 1000 - 4000 4000 - 7000 7000 - 10000 10000 - 15000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Population Distribution Schertz 2050 Population Distribution .8/4/2022010,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\20220804_MXD_Files\20220804_Population Projections.mxd Attachment 3 Comal Comal Bexar Guadalupe Bexar Guadalupe APPENDIX 4 - 30 YEAR HOUSING DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 30 09 F M 4 82 IH 35 S E F M 1 518 N F M 2252 F M 2 53 8 IH 1 0 W F M 1103 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 1 0 4 4 GIN R D M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A LL E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1604 N PVT B O LT O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R TZ P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B AT C A V E R D W A L D R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D MILL E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D KIT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W EIL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V ALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T SAVA N N A H DR R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L RIC H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A EFE R R D S C H W A B R D F M 465 M O R N I N G S I D E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D E EVANS RD STA P P E R R D WIE D E R S TEIN R D B EEC H T RL T O LLE R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIEL L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D ATH E NIA N WIE D N E R R D S C H M O E K EL R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D TOEPPER W EIN RD OLD NAC O G D OCHES R D FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N BIN D S EIL L N R K LN N EVANS RD IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M B IA M AIN S T W P E RIM E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O L D W IE D E R ST EIN R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O DLA N D O A K S D R M ARBA C H LN G O LF R D PHOENIX AVE H A LLIE H T S O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N DED EK E D R DIET Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D GIB B S -S P R A W L R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D FIF T H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T A LT O N B L V D KIS E R L N N E W B E R LIN R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M IC H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZAR PKWY O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER L N SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N H IL L S D R T U R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD RIP PLE W AY GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M AI N C IR W E L C O M E D R N OR-TEX DR C IB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS ST O LT E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE A G R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S CH ULZ ST HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREEK DR COPPERGATE S C E NIC HIL L L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN JO S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING RID G E LIN E R D TRIPLE L LN WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R T RL ABBEY RD C EN TE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N EID E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NEM EC LN R E A L R O C K R D COVE RS CV C AFF E Y RD R E D TIP D R R U STIC WILL O W LIBERTY RD HIG H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T A LLIO N L N O A K TE R R A C E D R JORDAN H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y MEADO W DR E K L EI N S T B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR ROSE L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S T IC E L N S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N VE R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W AYSPRINGTREE B L F PIG A LL E Y E A G L E D R S T AT E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U NLE S LN J O N S W AY 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R A Y C O R B E TT D R MAYFAIR HIN G E L OO P E L M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RAMP P RIC K LY P E A R D R L O M A VISTA ST KEY WEST WAY U T O P IA B L V D STANUSH RD FA W N R D G TU S A Y A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR MEDUSA H O P E L N FM 78 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E TZ R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD IH 1 0 W IH 35 N IH 1 0 E W EIL R D W E TZ R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H AECKERVILLE RD N G R AYT O W N R D IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 3009 F M 4 82 E F M 1518 N F M 25 38 F M 22 52 I H 1 0 W F M 1103 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G UIN R D GIN R D F M 1 0 44 M A RIO N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L LE Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1604 N IH 35 N ACCES S R D PVT B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 FM 78 W B AT C AV E R D MILL E R R D IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W EIL R D KITT Y H A W K R D S S A N TA C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O V ALLEY D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST SAVA N N A H DR R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U LL RIC H R D S C H A E F E R R D SCHWAB RD F M 465 C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD ST A P P E R R D M O R N IN G SID E D R W IE D E R S T EIN R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D PF A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D AT HENIA N WIE D N E R R D E EVANS RD SC H M O E K E L R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NAC O GDOCH ES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD BIN D S EIL L N C O L U M B IA TO EPPER W EIN R D BEECH TRL M AIN S T W P E RIM ETE R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D W IE D E R ST EIN R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O LD CIM A R R O N T R L BIS O N LN M ARBA C H L N DIE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B LV D N S O L M S R D DEDEKE DR FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K ST N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G OTHIC DR FF S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W MIC H E L S O N L N GIB B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A PLE D R LAZAR PKWY N E W B E R LIN R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R DEN RID G E D R S WATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN ST T U S C A N HIL L S D R TU R NIN G S T O N E H O L LY L N F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K ET L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C IR N O R-TEX DR CIB O L O T R L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N S S E G UIN R D S T E P H E N S L N R UECKLE RD H O YA L N G O L L S T O R T H AV E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S TY FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O LT E A C R E S C R EEK LO O P R A F B U R N E TT E AG R D E SC HU L Z S T HANOVER CV B ST KIL D A R E WIL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y W RIG H T A V E CEDAR CREEK DR COPPERGATE SC E NIC HILL L N K U S MIE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y MARIGOLD WAY STORM KING TRIPLE L LN SI E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L AZIN G STA R TRL ABBEY RD C E NTE R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N RIO L N C O R P O R A TE D R S C H N EID E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K VA L LE Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTRIDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D NE M EC LN R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD HIG HLA N D VISTA Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T STA LLIO N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E TT E L N D R A Y T O N JO R D A N H A E C K E R FIEL D S VE R D E P K W Y MEA D O W DR E KL E IN ST B R E E Z Y C V DANA D R RIO VISTA DR RO SE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D E S T RID T R L N O R T H S T J U S TI C E L N SU M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BENCH TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G HIL L ROYAL DR E A G LE F LIG H T IV Y L N P E C A N WAGON CROSSING V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A Y S P RIN G T R E E B LF PIG A L L E Y E A G LE D R S T A T E B LV D BRACKEN DR W U NLES LN JO N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN BLAZE M O O N R A Y C O R B E TT D R M AYFAIR H IN G E L O O P EL M S T TRAIL DUST LN B E N E K EIT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RAMP S T A C K S T O N E P RIC KLY P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O PI A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S AY A N O L D M A RIO N R D IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR WIN G E D F O O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W EIL R D IH 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W E TZ R D IH 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G SF O R D R D I H 1 0 W FM 78 WE FM 1518 N IH 35 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R AYTO W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C KERVILLE R D Legend ETJ Number of Households 2020 0 - 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Number of Households 2050 0- 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Residential Housing Distribution Schertz 2050 Residential Housing Distribution1/11/2022 .0 10,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\2021.08.19_TM Mxd. Files\20210831_Household Projections_Working.mxd Bexar Comal Guadelupe Bexar Comal Guadelupe APPENDIX 5 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 3009 F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2252 F M 2538 IH 35 S IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D M A RIO N R D PVT IH 35 N A C C E S S R D S C H E RTZ P K W Y FM 78 E IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D B O LT O N R D N ABBOTT RD FM 78 W C R E E K R D GIN R D MIL L E R R D FM 1976 W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1604 N CIB O L O V ALL E Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST L O O K O U T R D S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A EF E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D W IE D E R S T EIN R D S T A P P E R R D PAT BOOKER RD T O LLE R D D E A N R D KITT Y H A W K R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILLE R D M A S K E R D B A T C A V E R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D U NIV E R S A L CIT Y B L V D WIE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D OLD NACOGDO CHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N S C H M O E KEL R D N EVANS RD C O L U M B I A M AIN ST Y O U N G S F O R D R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D M O R NIN G SI D E D R A E R O A V E SCHOENTHAL RD O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D H A LLIE H TS BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E ST O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FREUDENBURG RD FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M AIN S T KIS E R L N IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D O L D CIM A R R O N T R L G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R F O U R T H S T E WALD RD LA Z A R PK W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P AT H WIN N A V E H S T W PLA NE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN S T F O R U M R D W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RILY N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD N S O L M S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A S T E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N S T A N TL E R D R F S T W BALBOA DR H O Y A L N P E C A N D R PHOENIX AVE S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS CORONADO BLVD PATSY DR CREST WAY RD H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y LN G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T T E N E W B E R LIN R D D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T IH 35 S ACCESS RD D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E DONALAN DR TRI-C O U N TY P K W Y T O N K A W A P ASS V A L H A L L A A UTH O RIT Y LN COPPERGATE C A V A N SILV E R WIN G S C E NIC HIL L LN SCHUETZ DR OLD GRAYTO W N RD K U S MIE R Z R D WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGH WAY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T TRIPLE L L N S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R L N WIL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D KIN G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y EL R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV U LT R A LIG H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D TIP D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O TU S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R MEADO W LARK CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T E E VA N S R D C O L E TT E L N L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O ST M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH BORGFELD RD NAC O G DO CH ES LO O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P VT S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y ST S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A TR L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA P T SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WILL O W BLF B R A H M A W A Y MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER WOOD DR B L U E B E LL D R M E S A V E R D E WIN KLE R T RL S A D D L E H O R N W AY KIP P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R PIG A LL E Y E A G L E D R D E N-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D BACALL WAY OAK BLOOM B R O O K L IN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R AY C O R B E TT D R T U R Q U OIS E TA TE S D R M O U NT OLY M P U S IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CIBO L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y SE N N A HILLS D R RED IR O N TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O LDE M O S S PIN G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N FARMVIEW LN C ITADEL P EAK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A L LE Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K LY P E A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VIS T A B L U E S A G E L N STANUSH RD O Z U N A D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A NY W A Y L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W SIL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V ERDE C A TT L E R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S HAD O W Y DUSK COLT TRAIL JEANETTE DR GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R YLLIS H A LLIE L O O P F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N RID G E D R M AY F L O W E R R U S TIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y A N D R E W S AVE F R E A D L N S TILL B R O O K LN P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R IDAMARIE LENO WAY PIN S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N P A T R IC K H E N R Y MALDEN DR PARRY PATH SAVERNE WAY K A U RI C LIF F S C A N T E R B U R Y HILL R AW E AV E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O L L B A RTEN H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL PA T H F IN DE R M U S T A N G V A L LE Y KLEIN CIR LUCILLE NEWNING JU LIA N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R R H EA ST N O TTIN G S HIR E GIN S B E R G D R S A D DLE SP OKE CIB O L O XIN G M E DI A T O R R U N CIB O L O T O LL E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O T H A U D R J E S S E S CIR IH 35 S Y O U N G S F O R D R D IH 1 0 W W EIL R D O A K S T K N E U P P E R R D W E TZ R D N M AIN S T IH 35 N I H 1 0 E PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N FM 78 W S C H A E F E R R D W E TZ R D S PE RIM ETE R R D KUSMIERZ RD H A E C K E R VILL E R D N G R A Y T O W N R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend SchertzWW_CCN_Boundary Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 5 Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Oakmont Place Carmel Ranch Graytown CrossvineModule III Parklands &Parklands II APPENDIX 6 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN IH 35 N F M 3009 F M 78 IH 1 0 E F M 482 F M 1103 E F M 1518 N W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2252 IH 35 S F M 2 538 E LOOP 1604 N IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L LE Y R D M A RIO N R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E B O LT O N R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 78 W W A R E-S E G UIN R D N A B B O TT R D FM 1976 CIB O L O VA L L EY D R C R E E K R D GIN R D ST O LTE R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R S T S AV A N N A H D R L O O K O U T R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E TZ R D A RIZ P E R D WIE D E R ST EIN R D T O LL E R D MIL L E R R D PAT BOOKER RD D E A N R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D PVT H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D W IE D N E R R D KITTY H A W K R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E RIM ET E R R D K O E H L E R R D U N I V E R S A L CIT Y B L V D OLD NACOGDOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N B A T C A V E R D N E V A N S R D R O N R D C O L U M BIA M AIN S T W P E RIM ET E R R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D SCHOENTHAL RD A E R O A V E S C H M O E K EL R D O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D S T A P P E R R D H A LLIE H TS Y O U N G S F O R D R D BIS O N L N DIETZ R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D WALD RD FIF T H S T W N O R T H B LV D O A K S T M O R N IN G SID E D R N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T L A U R A H T S IH 35 S ACCESS RD J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A PL E D R S S A N T A C L A R A R D F O U R T H ST E L AZA R PK W Y E AVIA TIO N B LV D O LD CIM A R R O N T R L O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B OR G F E L D RD N S O L M S R D B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D WIN N A V E H S T W IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D PLA N E LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN S T W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O LL Y LN M A RIL Y N D R F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K ET L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E FREUDENBURG RD T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L LE RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N ST A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS H S T E H O L M A N R D C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E TT E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E F O R U M R D HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B L V D KIL D A R E BALBOA DR DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N T Y P K W Y V A L H A L L A CRESTWAY RD A U TH O RITY L N COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G S C E NIC HILL L N SCHUETZ DR WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGHW AY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A RIG O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M KIN G 1 S T S T T RIPLE L LN S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H M ID T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R AT E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V ALL E Y VIE W D R TO N K A W A PASS W S C H A E F E R R D KI N G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV U LT R A LIG H T R D CAFFEY RD R E D TIP D R ATHENIAN H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O TU S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIAG O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O RG F ELD R D NACO G D O CHES LO OP C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T AT E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A LL E Y S T S U M A C L N JA S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VICT O RIA PT SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WIL L O W B L F B R A H M A W AY MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B ELL D R M E S A V E R D E WIN KLER T RL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A RI D R E E V AN S R D PIG A LL E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R DEN-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K LIN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U OIS E T A T E S D R MOUNT OLYMPUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CORDOBA DR C IB O L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y R ED IR O N EL M S T TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y OLDE M OSS PIN G W A Y HICK O RY BEN D C ITADEL P EAK IH 35 N RAMP T E X A S VA L L E Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VIS T A B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A N Y W AY L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S IL V E R B U C K L E M A X FLI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R P E R SIA D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O VE R D E C ATT LE R U N LI G U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D USK AUTUMN HOLW C O LT T R AIL GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K WIN DIN G T R L A M A R Y L LIS H A LLIE L O O P F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W S U N RID G E D R M A YFL O W E R R U STIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B RIC K E LL R D RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A YL A L N C O LIN A W AY F R E A D L N R O B E R T STE V E N S AILE R O N D R S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R P L A N TE R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY PI N S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N T A P W O O D LN SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U R I C LIF F S C A N T E R B U R Y HIL L R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O LL B A RTEN H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL PAT H FI ND ER M U ST A N G V A L L E Y K L EIN CIR MISTY MEADOW NEWNING J U LIA N PT GANDER PARK LIN C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H IR E D R R HEA ST P OS EID O N N O TTIN G SHIRE A U T U M N A R B O R GIN S B E R G D R SADDLE SPO KE CIB O L O XIN G M E D IA T O R R U N CIB O L O T O L L E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N BARKWOOD Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N LY V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O TH A U D R A L A B A S T E R EL GIN P A R K J E S S E S CIR M E A D O W V W A ST W IH 1 0 E K N E U P P E R R D W ET Z R D IH 35 N RAMP N M AIN S T FM 78 W E FM 1518 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E FE R R D IH 35 N S P E RIM E TE R R D O A K S T PFEIL RD W E TZ R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D IH 35 S IH 1 0 W N G R A Y T O W N R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend Schertz_Water_CCN_Service_Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_WaterCCN.mxd . Parklands &Parklands II Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Carmel Ranch Attachment 6 Oakmont Place CrossvineModule III Graytown APPENDIX 7 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN IH 35 N IH 1 0 E F M 3009 F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 2538 G R E E N V A LL E Y R D IH 35 S F M 22 52 IH 1 0 W FM 1516 N M A RIO N R D PVT GIN R D B O LT O N R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y FM 78 E FM 78 W C R E E K R D N A B B O TT R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D MILL E R R D FM 1976 CIB O L O V A LL E Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST E L O O P 1604 N S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A EF E R R D L O O K O U T R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D W E TZ R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D A RIZP E R D WIE D E R S T EIN R D S T A P P E R R D T O LL E R D D E A N R D P F A N N STIE L L N BOENIG DR T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D M A S K E R D WIE D N E R R D PAT BOOKER RD N GRAYTOWN RD S C H M O EK E L R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D Y O U N G SF O R D R D OLD NACO G D O CHES RD FM 78 EAST KIT T Y H A W K R D D O E R R LN N EVANS RD ULL RIC H R D M O R NIN G SI D E D R C O L U M B IA M AIN S T SCHOENTHAL RD S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR B A T C A V E R D G O L F R D H A LLIE H T S IH 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WALD RD BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FIFT H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T FREUDENBURG RD N M AIN S T KIS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A P LE D R F O U R T H S T E N S O L M S R D L AZAR PK W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P A T H W AVIATION BLVD WIN N A V E H S T W PLANE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN ST W A H L L N T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RILY N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E DEER CREEK BLVD R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R -T E X D R CIB O L O TR L H O L L E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN S T A TIO N S T A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T HIR D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U ST Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS N PERIMETER RD H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T TE D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E W W E T Z S T DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N TY P K W Y V A L H A L L A A U T H O RITY L N IH 35 S ACCESS RD COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G O A K SID E S C E NIC HIL L LN SCHUETZ DR K U S MIE R Z R D WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N OLD HIGH WAY 81 J O S H S W AY M A RIG O L D W A Y CIR C LE O A K D R S T O R M KIN G 1 S T S T T RIPLE L LN S PERIMETER RD CYPRESS PT B L AZIN G S TA R T R L ABBEY RD D O E P P E N S C H MID T R D PARKVIEW DR N E W B E R LIN R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R ATE D R WIN B U R N AV E PHOENIX AVE S C H N EID E R LN WIL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H LE Y P A R K V A L L EY VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D K IN G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y OLD GRAYTO W N RD K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C O VERS CV ULT R ALIG H T R D C A F FE Y R D R E D TIP D R H A R V E ST B E N D R U S TIC W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T RIT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T C O L E TT E L N L O W E R V A LL E Y L N D R AY T O N H A E C K E R FIEL D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH BORGFELD RD N A C O G D O C HES LO O P C R E ST O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D S EID E L S T L O O P 5 39 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S OLMS R D DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA P T SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WILL O W BLF B R A H M A W A Y MIL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B ELL D R M E S A VE R D E WIN KLE R T RL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y KIP P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G TR E E B L F S A F A R I D R PIG A L L E Y E A G L E D R D E N-O T T HILL A S H W O O D R D W UNLES LN OAK BLOOM B R O O K L IN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R A Y C O R B E TT D R T U R Q U OIS E TATE S D R IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CI B O L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y RED IR O N TRAIL DUST LN GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W AY O LDE M O SS PIN G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N CITAD EL PE AK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A LLE Y M E A D O W L N E EVA NS RD TITAN P RIC K LY P E A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D VI S T A B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B ETH A NY W A Y O A K R D G C A R R A N ZA L N IH 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W SIL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R I S T W R E D O A K TR L A R R O Y O VER D E C ATT LE R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y SHAD O W Y D U S K DEMETER S U N S E T C V COLT TRAIL JEANETTE DR GULF ST L A H M A V E T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R YL LIS H ALLIE L O OP FA W N P A S S SCARLET CRK RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD TILDEN TRL IR O L A D R H A LLIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N RID G E D R M AY F L O W E R R U S TIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K AY L A L N A ND R E WS AVE F R E A D L N S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R IDAMARIE T R A N Q UIL L N LENO WAY PIN S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N P A T R I C K H E N R Y MALDEN DR SAVERNE WAY K A U RI C LIF F S C A N TE R B U R Y HILL R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R US H L N HID D E N K N O L L B A RTEN H EIM DR RUSTIC TRL PATH F IN DE R M U S T A N G V A L LE Y KLEIN CIR LUCILLE NEW NI NG J U LIA N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R R H EA ST P O SEI DON N O TTIN G S HIR E GIN S B E R G D R SADDLE SPO KE CIB O L O XIN G M E DI A T O R R U N CIB O L O T O LL E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O TH A U D R J E S S E S CIR N M AIN S T E FM 1518 N Y O U N G S F O R D R D FM 78 W IH 1 0 W IH 35 S O A K ST S P E RIM ETE R R D W EIL R D W ET Z R D IH 35 N IH 1 0 E PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D W E TZ R D H A E C K E R VILL E R D WEICHOLD RD Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Wastewater CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJCommercial Parcels Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcels Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 7 APPENDIX 8 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN IH 35 N F M 3009 IH 1 0 E F M 78 F M 482 E F M 1518 N F M 1103 W EIL R D F M 2252 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 25 38 IH 35 S E L O O P 1604 N FM 1516 N I H 1 0 W G R E E N V A LL E Y R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D M A RIO N R D S C H E R TZ P K W Y FM 78 E FM 1976 N A B B O TT R D B O LT O N R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D F M 7 8 W CIB O L O V A LLE Y D R S T O LT E R D E N G E L R D W EIR R D B U N K E R ST L O O K O U T R D PVT GIN R D S A V A N N A H D R C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D MIL LE R R D C O Y O T E R U N FIFT H S T E N S A N TA C L A R A R D A RIZ P E R D C R E E K R D WIE D E R ST EIN R D W E TZ R D PAT BOOKER RD T O L L E R D KIT T Y H A W K R D D E A N R D PFA N N S TIE L LN BOENIG DR B A T C A VE R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D U NIV E R S A L C IT Y B L V D WIE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E PE RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D OLD NACOGDOCHES RD FM 78 EAST D O E R R L N N E V A N S R D C O L U M BIA S T A P P E R R D M AIN S T S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O AV E IH 3 5 S A C C E S S R D O L D WIE D E R S T EIN R D WEICHOLD RD WOODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H M O E K EL R D H A L LIE H T S BIS O N L N DIE T Z R D W E ST O N R D E C K H A R D T R D DIM R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D Y O U N G SF O R D R D FIFT H S T W N O R T H BLV D O A K ST N M AIN S T O LD CIM A R R O N T R L R O N R D KIS E R L N G E R D ES R D G O T HIC D R FF S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B EL R D GREAVES LN M A PL E D R F O U R T H S T E M O R N I N G SID E D R LA Z A R P K W Y E A VIA TIO N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y IK E L N F A W N D R W B OR G F E L D RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VIA TIO N B LV D W IN N A V E F O R U M R D H ST W PLA NE LN SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN ST W A H L L N S S A N T A C L A R A R D T U R NIN G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L LY L N M A RIL Y N D R F ST E DEER CREEK BLVD I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A ST E LOOP 539 E T H O R N T O N L N RIVE R R D MAIN CIR N O R- T E X D R CIB O L O T RL H O LL E RIN G VIN E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G UIN R D STEPHENS LN PATSY DR BALBOA DR S T ATIO N S T PHOENIX AVE A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N PE C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D CORONADO BLVD T HIR D S T W CREST WAY RD T O W N C R EE K R D D U STY FIE L D S VOGES PASS M EA D O W LA R K H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS WAY C O D Y L N G L O XINIA D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E TT E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y K R U E G E R C A N Y O N 1 ST S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B LV D KIL D A R E DONALAN DR T RI-C O U N TY P K W Y TO N K A W A P ASS V A L H A L L A A U T H O RIT Y L N COPPERGATE C A V A N SIL V E R WIN G S C E NIC HILL L N WINDSOCK LN F RIE S E N H A H N L N J O S H S W A Y M A RI G O L D W A Y CIR C L E O A K D R S T O R M K IN G 1 S T S T TRIPL E L LN S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S TA R TR L AB BEY RD PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN RIO L N C O R P O R A T E D R WIN B U R N A V E S C H N EID E R LN W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B RIS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A LL E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D KIN G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F RITZ W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W BRUSH TRAIL BEND R E A L R O C K R D C OVER S CV U LT R A LIG H T R D CAFFEY RD R E D TIP D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TIC WIL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T RIT O NE E VAN S R D P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN ASIA G O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A LLE Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O ST M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O RG F ELD R D NACO GD OCHES LOOP C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 539 W T R O Y L N J U S TI C E L N E A G L E VA L L E Y S T S U M A C LN J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S RD DOBIE BLVD CIN C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA PT SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N WIL L O W B LF B R A H M A W A Y M IL L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER WOOD DR B L U E B ELL D R M E S A V E R D E WINKLE R TRL S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P RIN G T R E E B L F S A F A RI D R PIG A L L E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R D E N-O TT HILL A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K LIN E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R AY C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U OIS E TA TE S D R MOUNT OLYMPUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V MIN E R A L S P G S CIBO L O L N TIM B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T RIP L E C R O W N C O L O N Y S E N N A HILL S D R RED IR ON E L M ST GAGE PARK M E S Q UIT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O LDE M O S S PIN G W A Y HIC K O R Y B E N D PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N CITA DEL PEAK IH 35 N RAMP TE X A S V A LL E Y M E A D O W L N P RIC K L Y PE A R D R L U C K SID E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V IS T A GAMBELS QUAIL B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y SIOUX CIR B E T H A N Y W AY L A S CIM A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S IL V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SIA D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C ATTLE R U N LIG U RIA D R L O O K O V E R B A Y SHAD O W Y D U S K AUTUMN HOLW C O LT T R AIL GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K WIN DIN G T R L A M A R YLLIS H ALLIE LO OP F A W N P A S S RIC H M O N D D R BRITE RD IR O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W S U N RID G E D R M A YFL O W E R R U STIC A C R E S PIL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B RIC K EL L R D RHODE DR MCCOY LN CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y F R E A D L N R O B E R T S T E V E N S AIL E R O N D R S TILL B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A LL E Y D R PL A N T E R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY PI N S E E K E R LIA N A WIL L O W R U N PARRY PATH TA P W O O D L N SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U RI C LI F F S C A N T E R B U R Y HIL L R A W E A V E GLEN CV P O R T R U S H L N HID D E N K N O LL B A RTE N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P AT HFI ND E R M U S T A N G V A LLE Y KLEIN CIR NEWNING J U LIA N P T SENECA CRK LIN C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S HIR E D R RH E A S T N OTTIN G S HIR E A U T U M N A R B O R TORONTO DR GIN S B E R G D R SADD LE SPO K E CIB O L O XIN G B RIA R K N O L L M E D IA T O R R U N CIB O L O T O L L E R D TIF F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R OTH AU D R A L A B A S TE R EL GIN P A R K J E S S E S CIR A ST W W E T Z R D FM 78 W W E TZ R D IH 1 0 E N M AIN ST IH 35 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E FE R R D O A K S T Y O U N G S F O R D R D S PERIM E TER R D E FM 1518 N PFEIL RD H A E C K E R VIL L E R D I H 1 0 W IH 35 S Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Water CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcel Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-WaterCCN.mxd . Attachment 8 APPENDIX 9 - WASTEWATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 482 C R EE K R D E P E RIM E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM E TE R R D G E R D E S R D G O LF R D W E S T O N R D ST O L TE R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P AT H F M 7 8 O PIE L N EL B E L R D LOOP 539 E N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN A P G L N BOENIG DR BUNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D OLD GRAYTO W N RD H O L M A N R D TRIPLE L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EID E R L N F R O B O E S E L N FM 78 EAST VOGES PASS OLD NAC O G D O C H E S R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 2252 DAVIE LN F M 2 5 3 8 RETAMA PKWY W EIR R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R C A L E D R MIL L E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D S C H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A L LE Y R D PIP E S T O N E GIN R D T O LL E R D ARIZPE RD B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D K RIE W A L D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D B AT C A V E R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 78 W MIDAS E F M 15 18 N WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N ACCESS RD KIS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E T Z R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A N TA C L A R A R D FF S T E EVANS RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D K R U E G E R C A N Y O N S A F A RI D RCINNABAR C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N E F M 1 51 8 N B U N K E R ST E LOOP 1604 N F M 2538 E FM 1518 N FM 78 F M 2252 B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D W E T Z R D E F M 1518 N B U N K E R S T N ABBOTT RD FM 78 E F M 2 25 2 FM 2538 F M 2252 F M 1103 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D M A RIO N R D P F A N N STIE L L N FM 78 F M 7 8 W ST O L TE R D F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D F M 3009 L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 48 2 W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2252 F M 482 F M 3009 FM 78 W A L D R D FM 482 W EIL R D F M 2 25 2 F M 1103 E F M 1 5 1 8 N IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 3009 HAECKERVILLE RD FM 22 5 2 FM 78 E PFEIL RD B O LT O N R D FM 482 F M 4 8 2 N A B B O T T R D F M 3009 W E IR R D F M 4 8 2 W E TZ R D L O WE R S EG UI N RD FM 78 FM 482 D E A N R D FM 482 ZUEHL RD FM 78 W FM 78 W EIL R D FM 2538 FIF T H ST E E N G E L R D SCHOENTHAL RD IH 35 N A C C E S S R D F M 78 FM 482 F M 3009 W EIL R D A RIZ P E R D T O LL E R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 3 00 9 I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D Legend ETJSchertz City Limit Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Sewer Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Sewer CCN Map.mxd 8/8/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 9 APPENDIX 10 - WATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 482 C R E E K R D E P E RIM ETE R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E RIM ETE R R D G E R D E S R D G O L F R D W E ST O N R D S T O LT E R D F M 78 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P A T H F M 7 8 O PIE L N E L B EL R D LOOP 539 E N O R-T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR RETAMA PKWY BUNKER ST D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E TT E TRIP LE L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EID E R L N F R O B O E S E L N FM 78 EAST O L D N A C O G D O C HES R D PFANNSTIEL LN CAFFEY RD F M 22 52 DAVIE LN W EIR R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R F M 2 5 3 8 C A LE D R MILL E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D SC H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A LL E Y R D PIP E S T O N E GIN R D T O LL E R D ARIZPE RD B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D K RIE W A L D L N S M AIN ST Y O U N G SF O R D R D W A R E-S E G UIN R D E L O O P 1 6 04 N FIFTH ST E SHAY PASS FM 78 W MIDAS E F M 15 18 N WIE D N E R R D IH 35 N AC C ESS RD KIS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E TZ R D T R AIN E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3009 N S A NTA C L A R A R D F F S T W EIL R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D S A F A RI D RCINNABAR C T E N G E L R D M A RIO N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N T O L L E R D P F A N N STIE L L N W E T Z R D S T O LT E R D E FM 1 51 8 N FM 78 F M 4 8 2 Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 2252 F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D E FM 1518 N LOW ER SE GU IN R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 482 E FM 1518 N SCHOENTHAL RD FM 78 A RIZ P E R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D N ABBOTT RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482FM 482 W E IR R D F M 3009 F M 2 25 2 F M 2252 IH 35 N A C C E S S R D F M 1103 B O LT O N R D IH 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 E F M 1 518 N B U N K E R S T W ETZ R D PFEIL RD HAECKERVILLE RD F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D FM 78 H A E C K E R VIL L E R D ZUEHL RD F M 1103 FM 2538 A RIZ P E R D F M 3009 W EIL R D FM 78 W F M 2 252 N A B B O TT R D B U N K E R ST M A RIO N R D FIF T H S T E F M 4 8 2 FM 78 F M 3 00 9 D E A N R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2 2 52 F M 3009 FM 2538 FM 78 E IH 35 N A C CES S R D FM 78 E F M 7 8 W W EIL R D B O LT O N R D L O W E R S E G UIN R D F M 48 2 F M 7 8 FM 2538 F M 3009 FM 482 E N G E L R D F M 3009 FM 482 F M 2538 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 3009 F M 2252 PFEIL RD FM 78 Legend ETJ Schertz City LimitSchertz Water CCN Service AreaSchertz Water CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Water Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Water CCN Map.mxd 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Attachment 10 APPENDIX 11 - NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 12 - 2030 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 13 - 2030 WATER CIP MAP 2030 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 14 - 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 15 - 2050 WATER CIP MAP 2050 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 16 - FLOW METER, METER BASIN, & RAIN GAUGE LOCATION MAP ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ FM01 FM04 FM02 FM03 FM12 FM14FM06 FM05FM13 FM08 FM09 FM07 FM15 FM10 FM11 RG01 RG02 RG06 RG05 RG04 RG03 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_1_RainGauge_FlowMeterBasins.mxd Attachment 1 Flow Meter, Meter Basin, and Rain Gauge Location8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend ^_Flow Meter ÔÕ Rain Gauge ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Gravity Main CCMA SchertzFlow Meter Basins BasinID FM01 FM02 FM03 FM04 FM05 FM06 FM07 FM08 FM09 FM10 FM11 FM12 FM13 FM14 FM15 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 17 - DRY WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 18 - WET WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 19 - EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION RESULTS, SURCHARGE, & SSO LOCATION MAPS ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4 4.A 4.B 4.C 4.D 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.550.275 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.A Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.20.1 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.B Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.C Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.30.15 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.D Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 20 - NEAR TERM WASTEWATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NEAR TERM WASTE WATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 21 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 22 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main SARA's System Lines Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 23 - SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend SSO #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ Gravity Line Gravity Line 2030 New Growth CIP SARA's System Lines SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS /0 1.5 30.75 Miles SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS APPENDIX 24 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 25 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2050 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 26 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Legend #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer CCN Boundary City Limits / ETJ SARA's System Lines Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 27 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 28 - INFLATION RATE CALCULATION SOURCES Year San Antonio Index Difference 2024 249.7 -4.7 2023 254.4 21 2022 233.4 33.9 2021 199.5 4 2020 195.5 11 2019 184.5 3.5 2018 181 5.5 2017 175.5 2.4 2016 173.1 1.3 2015 171.8 2.3 2014 169.5 5.2 2013 164.3 3.6 2012 160.7 8.1 2011 152.6 4.7 2010 147.9 26.6 2005 121.3 21.9 2000 99.4 1.4 1999 98 3.2 1998 94.8 1.4 1997 93.4 4.5 1995 88.9 8.2 1990 80.7 6.8 1985 73.9 18.9 1980 55 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2024 128%6.31% 2010 to 2024 169%3.81% 2000 to 2024 251%3.91% 1990 to 2024 309%3.38% 1980 to 2024 454%3.50% RSMeans Historical Inflation Indexes Year National Index Difference 2023 Q4 182.5 0.1 2023 Q3 182.4 0.4 2023 Q2 182 2.3 2023 Q1 179.7 1.1 2022 178.6 11.2 2021 167.4 29.6 2020 137.8 2.8 2019 135 4.2 2018 130.8 8.5 2017 122.3 4.8 2016 117.5 3.6 2015 113.9 3 2014 110.9 3.6 2013 107.3 3.7 2012 103.6 2.6 2011 101 4.6 2010 96.4 2.6 2009 93.8 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 132%9.65% 2010 to 2023 188%5.93% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes (Base 2009) Year Average Index Difference 2023 1373 78 2022 1295 96 2021 1199 22 2020 1177 21 2019 1156 60 2018 1096 58 2017 1038 49 2016 989 46 2015 943 41 2014 902 38 2013 864 34 2012 830 18 2011 812 13 2010 799 -33 2009 832 -76 2008 908 54 2007 854 61 2006 793 76 2005 717 62 2004 655 34 2003 621 2 2002 619 6 2001 613 18 2000 595 25 1999 570 21 1998 549 24 2010-1996 rates are stored online and can be provided if desired 1997 525 20 1996 505 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 117%5.27% 2010 to 2023 172%4.25% 2000 to 2023 231%3.70% 1996 to 2024 272%3.77% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes APPENDIX 29 - CIP PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-W1**Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 27%$206,715 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 0%$0 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 0%$0 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 0%$0 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 0%$0 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 0%$0 NT-W7**Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 69%$1,077,040 NT-W8**FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 22%$194,778 NT-W9**Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 0%$0 NT-W10**Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 0%$0 $23,206,556 -$1,478,532 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 100%$4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 89%$1,272,934 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 97%$3,569,245 2030-W4**Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 93%$9,192,317 2030-W5**Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 69%$4,411,757 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 100%$32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 33%$1,737,667 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 100%$6,063,000 $69,503,000 -$63,109,920 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 0%$0 2030-W10**River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 58%$1,354,926 $2,738,000 -$1,354,926 $72,241,000 -$64,464,846 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 $68,177,000 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 $4,775,000 $72,952,000 $168,399,556 $65,943,379 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. System Improvement Projects System Improvement Projects 2050 Growth Subtotal: Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050 CIP Projects are not included in this impact fee total. 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WATER CIP TOTAL: 2030 TOTAL: 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 21%$1,440,972 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 0%$0 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24"$10,425,000 23%$2,378,763 NT-S4**Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 20%$771,788 NT-S5**Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 25%$526,887 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 83%$13,523,463 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 74%$2,517,091 $45,760,800 -$21,158,965 NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 0%$0 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 0%$0 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 0%$0 $1,763,000 -$0 $47,523,800 -$21,158,965 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 67%$1,359,153 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8"$1,338,000 5%$68,849 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 10%$249,210 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 12%$47,722 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8"$1,663,000 83%$1,372,188 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 33%$1,613,509 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 100%$1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8"$475,000 100%$475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10"$2,525,000 100%$2,522,465 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10"$1,038,000 100%$1,034,756 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8"$3,113,000 97%$3,012,264 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"$400,000 40%$160,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 99%$2,677,145 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"$2,963,000 29%$849,531 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8"$1,275,000 52%$661,379 $29,342,000 -$18,041,171 2030 SI-1**Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 22%$1,833,143 2030 SI-2**Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 9%$121,579 2030 SI-3**Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 4%$46,406 2030 SI-4**Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 4%$13,741 2030 SI-5**Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 61%$3,099,614 2030 SI-6**Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 5%$392,686 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 0%$0 $24,527,000 -$5,507,169 $53,869,000 -$23,548,341 2050-S1 I-35 N 8"$9,088,000 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8"$6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8"$2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8"$1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 $28,865,000 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 $5,602,000 $34,467,000 $135,859,800 $44,707,306 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. Near Term CIP Growth Projects System Improvement Projects 2030 TOTAL: 2050 Growth Subtotal: 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term Growth Subtotal: Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WASTE WATER CIP TOTAL: System Improvement Projects 2050 CIP projects are not eligible to be included in the impact fee total. Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Waste Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update CCMA System Improvement Projects - Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Project Number Project Name Project Cost 2030 C-1 Roy Richard Drive Replacements $1,588,000 2030 C-2 Valencia Lane Replacements $2,288,000 2030 C-3 Savannah Drive Replacements $12,425,000 2030 C-4 Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line $12,950,000 $29,251,000CCMA System Improvement Projects Total: CCMA System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP NEAR TERM WATER CIP PROJECTS Justification: 1 LF 1,320 135$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 7,000$ 21,000$ 3 EA 3 8,500$ 26,000$ 4 EA 27 2,100$ $56,700 4 LF 660 196$ 130,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 446,000$ $23,000 $134,000 $610,000 $153,000 $763,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION System Improvement ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Service & System Connections SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W1** Project Category:Water CIP Type: Project Location: City identified CIP.Replace leaking 6" from River Rd to just south of Cibolo Creek along Bubbling Springs with 12", approximately 1,320 LF. Project Description: UNIT COST TOTAL PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control 1 LS 1 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station (2,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST. Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), construction is currently underway. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2,000 gpm Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W2 1 LS 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Controls ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W3 Project Description: Justification: Control improvements at Ware Seguin Pump Station to be per GST level rather than a timer. Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 1 LF 5,150 135$ $696,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 907,000$ $46,000 $273,000 $1,230,000 $308,000 $1,538,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W4 Project Location: Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Justification: Approximately 5,150 LF of 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin in open field. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL $455,555.79 Justification: Approximately 2,270 LF of 12" from Fred Couples to Schwab. Total cost shown is portion paid for by the City. Currently under construction. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Fred Couples to Schwab Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LF 5,400 135$ $729,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 *LS 1 16,000$ $16,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 941,000$ $48,000 $283,000 $1,280,000 $320,000 $1,600,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 5,400 LF of 12" from Schwab to Eckhardt. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schwab to Eckhardt Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 5,200 135$ $702,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 913,000$ $46,000 $274,000 $1,240,000 $310,000 $1,550,000 TOTAL Currently in design. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Approximately 5,200 LF of 12" along IH-10 from N. Graytown Rd to Pfeil Rd. Project Description: ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Graytown to Pfeil Project Number:NT-W7** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 2,300 135$ $310,500 2 EA 5 7,000$ $35,000 3 EA 5 8,500$ $42,500 4 EA 46 2,100$ $96,600 5 LS 1 8,000$ $8,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 518,000$ $26,000 $156,000 $700,000 $175,000 $875,000 Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Service & System Connections 12" Water Line Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Project Category:Water CIP Type:System Improvement Phase: Near Term ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8"/10" to 12" along FM 78 from east of Bubbling Springs Rd to end of dead-end line, approximately 2,300 LF. SWPPP Project Number:NT-W8** MOBILIZATION (5%) Project Name:FM 78 Water Line Replacement Justification: 1 LF 4,970 85$ $423,000 2 EA 10 7,000$ $70,000 3 EA 10 8,500$ $85,000 4 EA 100 2,100$ $210,000 5 LF 4,970 190$ $945,000 6 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 1,773,000$ $89,000 $532,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 $3,000,000 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 4" to 8" along Moonlight Meadow Dr and Lost Meadows Dr north of Schaefer Rd, approximately 4,970 LF. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name: Project Number:NT-W9** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 6,670 135$ $901,000 2 EA 14 7,000$ $98,000 3 EA 14 8,500$ $119,000 4 EA 134 2,100$ $281,400 5 LF 6,670 196$ $1,307,320 6 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 $2,751,000 $138,000 $826,000 $3,720,000 $930,000 $4,650,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8" to 12" along Robin Hood Way, approximately 6,670 LF. Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Robinhood Way WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W10** Project Category:Water 2030 WATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,060 170$ $1,030,200 2 EA 13 8,900$ $115,700 3 EA 13 10,700$ $139,100 4 LF 6,060 247$ $1,496,000 5 LS 1 22,000$ $22,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,835,000 $142,000 $851,000 $3,830,000 $958,000 $4,788,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W1 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 1,750 170$ $297,500 2 EA 4 8,900$ $35,600 3 EA 4 10,700$ $42,800 4 LF 1,750 247$ $432,000 5 LS 1 7,000$ $7,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $847,000 $43,000 $255,000 $1,150,000 $288,000 $1,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 1,750 LF of 12" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 5,590 110$ $614,900 2 EA 12 3,800$ $45,600 3 EA 12 10,700$ $128,400 4 LF 5,590 239$ $1,337,000 5 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,178,000 $109,000 $654,000 $2,950,000 $738,000 $3,688,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 8" loop north of Lower Seguin Rd, east of Ray Corbett Dr (approximately 5,590 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W3 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 2,960 170$ $503,200 2 LF 9,650 110$ $1,061,500 3 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 4 EA 20 3,800$ $76,000 5 EA 26 10,700$ $278,200 6 EA 253 2,650$ $670,450 7 LF 12,610 247$ $3,112,000 8 LS 1 46,000$ $46,000 9 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $5,833,000 $292,000 $1,750,000 $7,880,000 $1,970,000 $9,850,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line 8" Water Line 12" Gate Valve Service & System Connections Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W4** Project Category:Water CIP Type:Growth Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to supply new service area. Project Description: Upsize approximately 2,960 LF of 2" to 12" along Trainer Hale Rd east of FM 1518; and 9,650 LF of new 8" loop north of Trainer Hale Rd, east of FM 1518. Project Location: Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement 8" Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Justification: 1 LF 8,600 110$ $946,000 2 EA 18 3,800$ $68,400 3 EA 18 10,700$ $192,600 4 EA 172 2,650$ $455,800 5 LF 8,600 239$ $2,057,000 6 LS 1 31,000$ $31,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $3,783,000 $190,000 $1,135,000 $5,110,000 $1,278,000 $6,388,000 Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. Project Description: Upsize approximately 5,300 LF of 6" to 8" along Boenig Dr south of N Graytown Rd, and 3,300 LF new 8" along future Binz-Engleman Rd. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:Growth 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W5** Project Category:Water 1 LF 20,000 570$ $11,400,000 2 EA 40 25,700$ $1,028,000 3 EA 40 10,700$ $428,000 4 EA 16 17,700$ $283,200 5 EA 16 23,200$ $371,200 6 LF 20,000 269$ $5,388,000 7 LS 1 72,000$ $72,000 8 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $19,003,000 $951,000 $5,701,000 $25,660,000 $6,415,000 $32,075,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: Justification: Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission line (approximately 20,000 LF). In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control ARV (1") CAV (3") Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 24" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LS 1 2,518,000$ $2,518,000 2 EA 2 189,000$ $378,000 3 EA 1 126,000$ $126,000 4 LS 1 63,000$ $63,000 $3,085,000 $155,000 $926,000 $4,170,000 $1,043,000 $5,213,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W7 Project Location: Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 1,000 GPM GW Well 1,000 GPM Pump for PS VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 1 - Expand Ware Seguin to firm pumping capacity of 1,000 gpm, 105 TDH; and new groundwater well to provide supply to Ware Seguin. Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. 1 LF 4,300 230$ $991,000 2 EA 9 8,200$ $73,800 3 EA 9 23,100$ $207,900 4 LF 4,300 515$ $2,215,000 5 LS 1 34,000$ $34,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,590,000 $180,000 $1,077,000 $4,850,000 $1,213,000 $6,063,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 4,300 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and Scenic Lake Dr. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 70,000$ $140,000 2 EA 1 80,000$ $80,000 3 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 $239,000 $12,000 $72,000 $330,000 $83,000 $413,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" PRV Connection/Operations Expenses Justification: 3 new PRVs (2-6", 1-8") to create new pressure zone in southwest part of system. Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W9 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Description: 6" PRV 1 LF 2,590 170$ $440,300 2 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 3 EA 6 10,700$ $64,200 4 EA 52 2,650$ $137,800 5 LF 2,590 247$ $639,000 6 LS 1 10,000$ $10,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $1,377,000 $69,000 $414,000 $1,860,000 $465,000 $2,325,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,590 LF of ex. 6" to 12" along River Rd from FM 78 to Bubbling Springs Rd to remove bottleneck. Removes system bottleneck. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:River Rd 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W10** Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line Gate Valve 2050 WATER CIP PROJECTS  1 EA 1 543,000$     $543,000 2 EA 1 272,000$     $272,000 3 LS 1 163,000$     $163,000 $978,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station Expansion - Expand Corbett to 4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 2,000 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station Expansion Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W1 1 LF 6,290 230$ $1,450,000 2 EA 13 8,200$ $106,600 3 EA 13 23,100$ $300,300 4 LF 6,290 515$ $3,240,000 5 LS 1 49,000$ $49,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $5,214,000 $261,000 $1,565,000 $7,040,000 $1,760,000 $8,800,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 6,290 LF of 8" along FM 2252 and new loop. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 2252 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 461,000$ $922,000 2 EA 2 272,000$ $544,000 3 LS 1 147,000$ $147,000 $1,613,000 $81,000 $484,000 $2,180,000 $545,000 $2,725,000 Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 - Expand Ware Seguin to 1,200 gpm, 123 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 1,200 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W3 1 LF 3,270 230$ $754,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 EA 66 5,700$ $376,200 5 LF 3,270 515$ $1,685,000 6 LS 1 26,000$ $26,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,129,000 $157,000 $939,000 $4,230,000 $1,058,000 $5,288,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 1,590 LF of 6" to 8" along Beck St east of Schertz Pkwy, 1,680 LF of new 8". Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Beck St 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W4 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LF 3,100 230$ $715,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 LF 3,100 515$ $1,597,000 5 LS 1 24,000$ $24,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,624,000 $132,000 $788,000 $3,550,000 $888,000 $4,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 3,100 LF of new 8" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 1 14,232,000$ $14,232,000 2 LS 1 3,031,000$ $3,031,000 3 LS 1 922,000$ $922,000 4 LS 1 85,000$ $85,000 5 LS 1 6,723,000$ $6,723,000 $24,993,000 $1,250,000 $7,498,000 $33,750,000 $8,438,000 $42,188,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Foundation for GST Connect to 24" Main Pump Station Project Description: Justification: IH-35 Pump Station (4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST, new connection from SSLGC transmission main to the Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission main. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth 3.0 MG GST Yard Piping & Pumps for GST 1 LF 2,110 230$ $487,000 2 EA 5 8,200$ $41,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 LF 2,110 515$ $1,087,000 5 LS 1 17,000$ $17,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $1,816,000 $91,000 $545,000 $2,460,000 $615,000 $3,075,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 2,110 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and FM 1518. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W7 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 2,500 366$ $915,000 2 EA 5 19,000$ $95,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 EA 50 5,700$ $285,000 5 LF 2,500 531$ $1,329,000 6 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,828,000 $142,000 $849,000 $3,820,000 $955,000 $4,775,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,500 LF of 8" to 12" along Lower Seguin Rd.Needed for fire flow. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Capacity 12" Water Line Gate Valve NEAR TERM WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,600 360$ 2,376,000$ 2 EA 14 17,000$ 238,000$ 3 LF 6,600 214$ 1,413,000$ 4 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 4,071,000$ $204,000 $1,222,000 $5,500,000 $1,375,000 $6,875,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 1) with approximately 6,600 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 4,470 130$ 582,000$ 2 EA 9 17,000$ 153,000$ 3 LF 4,470 214$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1,730,000$ $87,000 $519,000 $2,340,000 $585,000 $2,925,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 2) with approximately 4,470 LF of 12-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 10,060 360$ 3,622,000$ 2 EA 20 17,000$ 343,000$ 3 LF 10,060 214$ 2,153,000$ 4 LS 1 29,000$ 29,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 6,172,000$ $309,000 $1,852,000 $8,340,000 $2,085,000 $10,425,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase V with approximately 10,060 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase V 24"Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S3 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: Justification: 1 LF 3,910 200$ 782,000$ 2 EA 8 17,000$ 133,000$ 3 LF 3,128 100$ 313,000$ 4 LS 1 203,000$ 203,000$ 5 LF 3,910 205$ 802,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 2,270,000$ $114,000 $681,000 $3,070,000 $768,000 $3,838,000 Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Lateral Lines Operational Expenses SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) TOTAL Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:Growth Project Location: Project Description: Lookout Line (8") upsized to 18-inch gravity line (~ 3,910 LF). Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Upsize Lookout Line Project Number:NT-S4** Waste Water Growth Justification: 1 LF 3,910 234$ 916,000$ 2 LS 1 1,168,800$ 1,168,800$ $2,084,800 UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. Project Description: Tri County Line upsized from 8-inch gravity line to 18-inch gravity line (~ 1,760 LF). Note: Costs provided by City. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Remaining Costs Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Category: CIP Type: Project Name:Upsize Tri County Line Project Number:NT-S5** 1 LF 21,680 200$ 4,336,000$ 2 EA 43 17,000$ 738,000$ 3 LF 21,680 205$ 4,445,000$ 4 LS 1 62,000$ 62,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 9,606,000$ $481,000 $2,882,000 $12,970,000 $3,243,000 $16,213,000 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Project Description: Project Location: SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Justification: Cibolo West Main with approximately 21,680 LF of 18-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cibolo West Main Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S6 $9,600,000 $13,000,000 $3,400,000 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S7 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL ELIGIBLE* PROJECT COST Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,940 LF of 18-inch gravity line serving Hallie’s Cove. Approximately 12,550 LF of 30-inch gravity line, approximately 5,990 LF of 14-inch force main, and WHC lift station. CostS provided by the City. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. *Only the cost increase between 2011 & 2024 is eligible to be included in the impact fee total. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST (2011) ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2024) 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ $3,000 $15,000 $70,000 $18,000 $88,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Tri County LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Tri County Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal Decommission Lift Station Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LF 2,410 105$ 254,000$ 3 EA 5 17,000$ 85,000$ 4 LF 2,410 193$ 466,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 888,000$ $45,000 $267,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Corbett LS to go offline. Approximately 2,410 LF of 10-inch gravity line installed to connect to existing system. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Corbett Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal SWPPP Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Decommission WWTP Project Description: Justification: Sedona LS to go offline and Woman Hollering Creek (WHC) WWTP decommissioned. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station & WWTP Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-3 2030 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 2,950 107$ 316,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,950 239$ 706,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,194,000 $60,000 $359,000 $1,620,000 $405,000 $2,025,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,950 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of Old Wiederstein Rd and along Hope Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S1 1 LF 1,900 107$ 204,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,900 239$ 455,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $785,000 $40,000 $236,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,900 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Old Wiederstein Rd from Dean Rd to vicinity of Kaylee Chase. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Old Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S2 1 LF 3,750 107$ 402,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 3,750 239$ 897,000$ 4 LS 1 14,000$ 14,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,517,000 $76,000 $456,000 $2,050,000 $513,000 $2,563,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,750 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S3 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S4 1 LF 2,400 107$ 257,000$ 2 EA 5 21,400$ 107,000$ 3 LF 2,400 239$ 574,000$ 4 LS 1 9,000$ 9,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $979,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,400 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Wiederstein Rd between Jupe and Quail Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S5 1 LF 7,300 107$ 782,000$ 2 EA 15 21,400$ 321,000$ 3 LF 7,300 239$ 1,746,000$ 4 LS 1 27,000$ 27,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $2,908,000 $146,000 $873,000 $3,930,000 $983,000 $4,913,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 7,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Schaefer Rd , Lisa Meadows and Voges pass. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S6 1 LF 2,800 107$ 300,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,800 239$ 670,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,142,000 $58,000 $343,000 $1,550,000 $388,000 $1,938,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Schaefer Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S7 1 LF 550 107$ 59,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 43,000$ 3 LF 550 239$ 132,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $274,000 $14,000 $83,000 $380,000 $95,000 $475,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Aranda, north of Chalk Stem. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Aranda 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S8 1 LF 3,500 132$ 463,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 150,000$ 3 LF 3,500 239$ 838,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,496,000 $75,000 $449,000 $2,020,000 $505,000 $2,525,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,500 LF of 10-inch gravity line west of Weir Rd and north of Trainer Hale Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Weir Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S9 1 LF 1,350 132$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 65,000$ 3 LF 1,350 239$ 323,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $607,000 $31,000 $183,000 $830,000 $208,000 $1,038,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,350 LF of 10-inch gravity line along Trainer Hale Rd, east of E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Trainer Hale Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S10 1 LF 4,550 107$ 487,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 214,000$ 3 LF 4,550 239$ 1,089,000$ 4 LS 1 17,000$ 17,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,839,000 $92,000 $552,000 $2,490,000 $623,000 $3,113,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Ware Seguin Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S11 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line along E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 1518 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S12 1 LF 4,000 107$ 428,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 4,000 239$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,604,000 $81,000 $482,000 $2,170,000 $543,000 $2,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,000 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S13 1 LF 4,350 107$ 466,000$ 2 EA 9 21,400$ 193,000$ 3 LF 4,350 239$ 1,041,000$ 4 LS 1 16,000$ 16,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,748,000 $88,000 $525,000 $2,370,000 $593,000 $2,963,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,350 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Boenig Dr and Ware Seguin Rd going north. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Boenig Drive 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S14 1 LF 1,800 107$ 193,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,800 239$ 431,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $750,000 $38,000 $225,000 $1,020,000 $255,000 $1,275,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E and along N Greytown Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:N Greytown Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S15 Justification: 1 LF 6,500 252$ 1,637,000$ 2 EA 13 21,400$ 279,000$ 3 LF 5,200 126$ 655,000$ 4 LS 1 535,000$ 535,000$ 5 LF 6,500 258$ 1,678,000$ 6 LS 1 24,000$ 24,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 4,840,000$ $242,000 $1,452,000 $6,540,000 $1,635,000 $8,175,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Traffic Control ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Operational Expenses Surface Replacement System Improvement To resolve 4 SSOs upstream of Friesenhahn LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~4,900 LF), parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and an existing 12-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,600 LF) immediately upstream of the Friesenhahn LS. Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost 2030 SI-1** Project Category:Waste Water Project Location: Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name:Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize Project Number: CIP Type: Justification: 1 LF 1,320 132$ 175,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 57,000$ 3 LF 1,056 126$ 133,000$ 4 LS 1 87,000$ 87,000$ 5 LF 1,320 243$ 321,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 813,000$ $41,000 $244,000 $1,100,000 $275,000 $1,375,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Fairlawn WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-2** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO upstream of Riata LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 10-inch gravity line (~1,320 LF) along Fairlawn Ave from Ashwood Rd to Riata LS. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 1,150 164$ 189,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 50,000$ 3 LF 920 126$ 116,000$ 4 LS 1 81,000$ 81,000$ 5 LF 1,150 247$ 284,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 760,000$ $38,000 $228,000 $1,030,000 $258,000 $1,288,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-3** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO near I 35 N. Project Description: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~1,150 LF), south of I-35 N and east of Hampton Inn & Suites of Schertz. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 250 164$ 41,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 11,000$ 3 LF 200 126$ 26,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LF 250 247$ 62,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 198,000$ $10,000 $60,000 $270,000 $68,000 $338,000 Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Woodland Oak Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-4** Project Location: Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~250 LF), near Woodland Oak Dr. To resolve an SSO near Woodland Oak Dr. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP Justification: 1 LF 3,330 378$ 1,258,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 143,000$ 3 LF 2,664 126$ 336,000$ 4 LS 1 330,000$ 330,000$ 5 LF 3,330 263$ 877,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 2,988,000$ $150,000 $897,000 $4,040,000 $1,010,000 $5,050,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 21" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Old Wiederstein WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-5** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To increase line capacity. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Description: Replacing an existing 18-inch with 21-inch gravity line (~3,330 LF), along Old Wiederstein Rd. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LS 1 4,637,000$ 4,637,000$ $4,637,000 $232,000 $1,392,000 $6,270,000 $1,568,000 $7,838,000 Project Location: TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (2,750 gpm) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Date: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade Project Number:2030 SI-6** 2030Phase: Northcliffe LS upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm. Project Description: Justification: To follow TCEQ requirement of peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 4,485 gpm. 1 LS 1 63,000$ 63,000$ 2 LF 420 107$ 45,000$ 3 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 4 LF 420 239$ 101,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 271,000$ $14,000 $82,000 $370,000 $93,000 $463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Belmont Park LS to go offline; install approximately 420 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along Livingston Dr. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-7 1 LF 1,220 252$ 308,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 53,000$ 3 LF 976 126$ 123,000$ 4 LS 1 101,000$ 101,000$ 5 LF 1,220 258$ 315,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 940,000$ $47,000 $282,000 $1,270,000 $318,000 $1,588,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 15-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,220 LF), east of Roy Richard Dr and south of Woodland Oaks Dr. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Roy Richard Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-1 1 LF 1,780 252$ 449,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 77,000$ 3 LF 1,424 126$ 180,000$ 4 LS 1 147,000$ 147,000$ 5 LF 1,780 258$ 460,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 1,353,000$ $68,000 $406,000 $1,830,000 $458,000 $2,288,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,780 LF), north of Woodland Oaks Dr and east of Valencia Ln. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Valencia Lane Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-2 1 LF 5,230 806$ 4,214,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 224,000$ 3 LF 4,184 126$ 527,000$ 4 LS 1 818,000$ 818,000$ 5 LF 5,230 292$ 1,528,000$ 6 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,362,000$ $369,000 $2,209,000 $9,940,000 $2,485,000 $12,425,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,230 LF), south of Savannah Dr and north of Live Oak Rd. To resolve an SSO near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Savannah Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-3 1 LF 5,450 806$ 4,391,000$ 2 EA 11 21,400$ 234,000$ 3 LF 4,360 126$ 549,000$ 4 LS 1 852,000$ 852,000$ 5 LF 5,450 292$ 1,592,000$ 6 LS 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,670,000$ $384,000 $2,301,000 $10,360,000 $2,590,000 $12,950,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,450 LF), near Community Cir, from Buffalo Dr to Live Oak Rd. To resolve 2 SSOs near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-4 2050 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,250 230$ 1,441,000$ 2 EA 13 46,100$ 600,000$ 3 LF 6,250 515$ 3,220,000$ 4 LS 1 49,000$ 49,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 5,378,000$ $269,000 $1,614,000 $7,270,000 $1,818,000 $9,088,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 6,250 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and along I-35 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name: I-35 N 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S1 1 LF 4,460 230$ 1,028,000$ 2 EA 9 46,100$ 415,000$ 3 LF 4,460 515$ 2,298,000$ 4 LS 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,844,000$ $193,000 $1,154,000 $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,460 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Friesenhahn Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Friesenhahn Lane 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S2 1 LF 3,910 230$ 901,000$ 2 EA 8 46,100$ 369,000$ 3 LF 3,910 515$ 2,014,000$ 4 LS 1 31,000$ 31,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,383,000$ $170,000 $1,015,000 $4,570,000 $1,143,000 $5,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,910 LF of 8-inch gravity line from Schaefer Rd north parallel to Authority Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S3 1 LF 1,930 230$ 445,000$ 2 EA 4 46,100$ 185,000$ 3 LF 1,930 515$ 995,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,708,000$ $86,000 $513,000 $2,310,000 $578,000 $2,888,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,930 LF of 8-inch gravity line, south of Corbett Junior High School and north of Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett JH 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S4 1 LF 830 230$ 192,000$ 2 EA 2 46,100$ 93,000$ 3 LF 830 515$ 428,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 789,000$ $40,000 $237,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 830 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S5 1 LF 2,220 230$ 512,000$ 2 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 3 LF 2,220 515$ 1,144,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,973,000$ $99,000 $592,000 $2,670,000 $668,000 $3,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,220 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and parallel to IH-10. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S6 1 LS 1 865,000$ 865,000$ 865,000$ $44,000 $260,000 $1,170,000 $293,000 $1,463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (~250 gpm) Project Description: Justification: Cypress Point LS upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm. To follow TCEQ requirement of Peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 1,233 gpm. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-1 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Schertz Pkwy LS to go offline. To convey flow to a new CCMA's line which will be built by 2050. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-2 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 2 LF 2,300 230$ 530,000$ 3 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 4 LF 2,300 515$ 1,185,000$ 5 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 6 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 2,168,000$ $109,000 $651,000 $2,930,000 $733,000 $3,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Park LS to go offline; install approximately 2,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along E Aviation Blvd. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-3 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Cover’s Cove LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-4 APPENDIX 30 - CIP PROJECTS UTILIZATION CALCULATIONS Project Number Project Name Existing Peak Flow (gpm) 2030 Peak Flow (gpm) 2050 Peak Flow (gpm) 2020-2030 % Utilization NT-W1**Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement 185.86 269.83 309.94 27% NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W7**Graytown to Pfeil - 32.61 46.93 69% NT-W8**FM 78 Water Line Replacement 369.10 500.30 589.39 22% NT-W9**Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement 18.83 18.83 18.83 0% NT-W10**Robinhood Way WL Replacement 46.06 46.06 46.06 0% 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive - 316.47 229.95 100% 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements - 177.06 200.02 89% 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd - 594.20 613.97 97% 2030-W4**Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement - 530.42 568.37 93% 2030-W5**Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement 2.43 117.51 166.63 69% 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main - 5,346.49 4,000.00 100% 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 600.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 33% 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements - 15.11 11.35 100% 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane N/A N/A N/A N/A 2030-W10**River Rd 6" WL Replacement 115.65 311.01 335.23 58% Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Water CIP Project Growth Utilization Calculations Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects N/A indicates that the project is not eligble to be included for impact fees. Utilizations in red indicate that it is an adjusted value because it was over 100% due to the build out flow occuring in 2030 instead of 2050. System Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name Existing Peak Flow (gpm) 2030 Peak Flow (gpm) 2050 Peak Flow (gpm) 2020-2030 % Utilization NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 - 33.20 158.4 21% NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 - - 11.6 0% NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24"- 33.20 145.5 23% NT-S4**Upsize Lookout Line 275.40 223.80 256.6 20% NT-S5**Upsize Tri County Line 273.90 216.00 229.1 25% NT-S6 Cibolo West Main - 1,052.90 1,262.3 83% NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main - 702.60 785.2 89% NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP N/A N/A N/A N/A 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line - 59.40 88.50 67% 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8"- 0.53 10.30 5% 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 - 11.60 119.30 10% 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 - 5.50 46.10 12% 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8"- 160.90 195.00 83% 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 - 42.30 128.80 33% 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 - 7.20 7.20 100% 2030-S8 Aranda 8"- 3.20 3.20 100% 2030-S9 Weir Road 10"- 597.00 597.60 100% 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10"- 31.90 32.00 100% 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8"- 122.60 126.70 97% 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"- 9.80 24.50 40% 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 - 67.20 68.10 99% 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"- 12.30 42.90 29% 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8"- 45.70 88.10 52% 2030 SI-1**Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize 769.20 1,114.10 1,538.10 22% 2030 SI-2**Fairlawn WW Upsize 658.40 722.70 727.20 9% 2030 SI-3**Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize 1,439.40 1,382.60 1,576.50 4% 2030 SI-4**Woodland Oak Drive Replacements 784.00 820.60 900.30 4% 2030 SI-5**Old Wiederstein WW Upsize 1,908.30 5,034.00 5,092.50 61% 2030 SI-6**Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade 3,824.00 4,048.70 4,485.00 5% 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Wastewater CIP Project Growth Utilization Calculations N/A indicates that the project is not eligble to be included for impact fees. Utilizations in red indicate that it is an adjusted value because it was over 100% due to the build out flow occuring in 2030 instead of 2050. Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects Growth Projects System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects APPENDIX 31 - OCTAVE METER SPECIFICATIONS Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com Bottom load multi-Jet meters 1 Master Meter’s Multi-Jet meter exceeds the AWWA C708 standard. With sensitivity to measure water flowing as low as 1/8 gallon per minute and accuracy unaffected by common particulates and build-up that would freeze other types, you can count on our Multi-Jet technology. Technical Specifications: AWWA Standard -Meets or exceeds all sections of AWWA Standard C-708, most recent revision. Compliant with SDWA, NSF ANSI 372 and NSF ANSI 61 standards. Register - Standard Direct Read, DIALOG® 3G AMR System registers, AccuLinx Encoder, and IP 68 Electrical Output registers available. Together, an integrated and migratable technology environment is attained; direct, proximity (touch), mobile AMR, and Fixed Network AMI. Register Sealing - Direct Read and DIALOG registers are permanently sealed with a scratch resistant glass lens, stainless steel base and wrap-around gasket to prevent intrusion of dirt or moisture. Features & Benefits: • Rugged basket strainer built from advanced polymer materials for superior wear mitigation. • Proprietary design produces smooth, laminar flow profile for improved accuracy • Award-winning DIALOG 3G register design houses all vital components - encoder, RF transmitter, battery and antennae - safely within the register’s stainless steel and tempered glass enclosure. Free of external wires, components and connections - the #1 cause of field related issues on competitive designs. • Assures compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). • Measures with only one moving part that is hydro- dynamically balanced on a sapphire bearing to preserve accuracy and promote a positive bottom line. • Exceptional performance in passing entrained solids and operating in environments with high mineral content. • Clean, elegant measurement design is highly sensitive to leaks and low flow while limiting wear for excellent revenue protection. Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com Bottom load multi-Jet meters 2 Accuracy and Head Loss Chart 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 ACCURACY% HEAD LOSS NO R M A L AW W A C 7 0 8 L O W 103.0% 101.5% 100% 98.5% 97.0%10 P.S.I. 3/4”5/8” 987 6 54321 1” 5/8 and 3/4” 1” 0 METER  OPERATING  CHARACTERISTIC/DIMENSION 5/8"3/4"  x  7-­‐1/2"3/4"  x  9"3/4"  x  9"  x  1"1” Flow  Rating  (gpm)20 30 30 30 50 Continuous  Flow  (gpm)15 20 20 20 30 Normal  Flow  Range  (gpm)1-­‐20 2-­‐30 2-­‐30 2-­‐30 3-­‐50 Extended  Low  Flow  (gpm)1/4 1/2 1/2 1/2 3/4 Maximum  Working  Pressure  (psi)150 150 150 150 150 Maximum  Working  Temperature  (F)120 120 120 120 120 Length  (A  below)7-­‐1/2"7-­‐1/2"9"9"10-­‐3/4" Width  (B  below)3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"4" Height,  standard  register  with  lid  (C  below)5"5"5"5"5-­‐1/4" Height,  bottom  to  center  line  (D  below)1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐3/4" Weight  (lbs)3.95 4.0 4.1 4.6 5.25 Packed  To  Carton 6 6 6 4 4 Carton  Weight  (lbs)25.1 25.4 26 19.8 22.4 Technical Specs (Cont’d): • Register Unit - Registration available in U.S. gallons, cubic feet or cubic meters. • Test Circle - Large center sweep hand with one hundred (100) clearly marked gradations on the periphery of the dial face (available on Direct Read and DIALOG 3G registers). • Design/Operation - Velocity-type flow measurement. Water that is evenly distributed by multiple converging inlet ports flows past an impeller in the measuring chamber, creating an impeller velocity directly proportional to water flow rate. The meter’s register integrates that velocity into totalized flow. An inherent advantage for this design is unparalleled wear mitigation leading to sustained revenues. The register assembly is removable under line pressure permitting seamless, simplified upgrades in reading technology. • Strainer - A rugged, 360-degree advance polymer basket strainer protects the critical measuring element from damage. The unique strainer design smoothes the flow of water entering into the meter creating a laminar flow that is gentle on the meter’s internal components. Tough materials operating in a smooth, balanced environment enable the meters to perform more accurately over time. Utilities’ investments last longer while capturing more revenue. • Measuring Chamber - The measuring chamber housing and measurement element are built with an advanced synthetic polymer. Measurement surfaces are not wear surfaces, providing sustained accuracy despite the presence of entrained solids in the water. A long life, synthetic sapphire bearing serves as a wear surface with radially balanced water flows. The chamber housing is constructed in two parts to allow access to the impeller. Bottom plates available in Bronze, Cast Iron (CI) or Engineered Plastic. B D C A Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com 1 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC METER® Features & Benefits: • Grade 316 Stainless Steel (2"-8") or Epoxy Coated Ductile Iron (10"-12") body design provides full compliance with ANSI/NSF 372 (AB1953 or NSF61G). • No moving parts. Minimal flow intrusion. Enduring accuracy. • Easy to install Floating Flanges on 2"-8" and Integrated Flanges on 10"-12". • No required strainer. • Wide beam ultrasonic measurement sensors for high accuracy and reliable operation. • Industry standard communication protocol for integration with most third-party AMR/AMI systems. • Active leak, burst, reverse flow, empty pipe, measurement failure, and low battery. LCD also displays rate of flow and water temperature. • Ruggedized NEMA 6P/IP-68+ construction; fully submersible design. • Designed to meet standards for both North American and International C&I water meters. • Optional flow measurements; Forward Only, Net Volume or Alternating Display (Forward and Reverse Consumption displayed separately). Octave brings the latest in ultrasonic metering technology to Commercial/Industrial (C&I) water meters and puts precise measurement where the real flows exist. An excellent alternative to mechanical compound, single-jet, floating ball, fire-service type and turbine meters, Octave excels at maintaining sustained accuracy for the life of the meter while providing smart AMR capabilities. Technical Specifications: Working Pressure - 175 PSI Liquid Temperature - 33° - 122 °F Metrological Characteristics - Meets ANSI/AWWA Standards C715-18, C750-19, ISO 4064 rev. 2014 Configuration - Compact-Display built into unit Power Source - 2 x D Size Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries - 10 year warranted life time Environmental Protection - NEMA 6P+ (IP68+), Ambient operation temp. -13 °F / +131 °F for the display Display Units - Multi line 12 digit LCD (Programmable USG, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Acre Feet for volume and GPM, Lt/s, or M³/h for rate of flow) Output - Programmable Encoder, Pulse, 4-20, or Modbus; Optional dual output available in encoder + pulse Available in sizes 1.5", 2", 3", 4", 6", 8", 10", and 12" UL Certification is available on 1.5" through 8" only. FM Approval is available on all sizes. Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com 2 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC METER® Performance Data & Dimensions NOTE — For Performance charts please see Engineering Document - Octave | Version 10.17. v1202.20F 1.5"x13"2"x10"2"x15.25"2"x17" (40 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm) 250 GPM 250 GPM 250 GPM 250 GPM (57 m3/h)(57 m3/h)(57 m3/h)(57 m3/h) 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM (0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h) 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM (0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h) 13"10"15.25"17" (330 mm)(250 mm)(390 mm)(432 mm) 5-3/4"5-3/4"5-3/4"5-3/4" (146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm) 6-3/4"6-3/4"6-3/4"6-3/4" (172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm) 2-1/8"2-1/8"2-1/8"2-1/8" (54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm) 20 lbs 15 lbs 22 lbs 24 lbs (9 kg)(7 kg)(10 kg)(11 kg) • +/- 1.5% in the Normal Operating Range • +/- 5% in the Extended Low Flow Height Height from Center Pipe Weight * In the water temperature of 45° to 85° F (7° to 30° C), meter consumption is accurately measured at: Octave Operating Characteristics and Dimensions Safe Maximum Operating Capacity Normal Operating Range (98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy)* Extended Low Flow (95% - 105% Accuracy) Length Width 3"4"6"8"10"12" (80 mm)(100 mm)(150 mm)(200 mm)(250 mm)(300 mm) 500 GPM 1,000 GPM 1,600 GPM 2,800 GPM 5,500 GPM 5,500 GPM (114 m3/h)(227 m3/h)(363 m3/h)(636 m3/h)(1,250 m3/h)(1,250 m3/h) 1 – 500 GPM 1.5 – 1,000 GPM 3 – 1,600 GPM 5 – 2,800 GPM 14 – 5,500 GPM 14 – 5,500 GPM (0.23 – 114 m3/h)(0.34 – 227 m3/h)(0.68 – 363 m3/h)(1.5 – 636 m3/h)(3.2 – 1,250 m3/h)(3.2 – 1,250 m3/h) 0.5 GPM 0.75 GPM 2 GPM 4 GPM 8 GPM 8 GPM (0.11 m3/h)(0.17 m3/h)(0.45 m3/h)(0.9 m3/h)(1.8 m3/h)(1.8 m3/h) 12"14"18"20"17-3/4"19-3/4" (305 mm)(356 mm)(457 mm)(508 mm)(451 mm)(502 mm) 7-1/2"9"11"13-1/2"16"19-3/4" (190 mm)(229 mm)(280 mm)(343 mm)(406 mm)(502 mm) 8-1/2"9-7/8"10-7/8"12-7/8"16-1/2"19-3/4" (216 mm)(250 mm)(276 mm)(327 mm)(419 mm)(502 mm) 3-1/2"4-1/2"5-1/8"6-3/8"8"9-7/8" (90 mm)(115 mm)(130 mm)(162 mm)(203 mm)(251 mm) 23 lbs 35 lbs 51 lbs 78 lbs 150 lbs 210 lbs (10.5 kg)(16 kg)(23 kg)(35 kg)(68 kg)(96 kg) • +/- 1.5% in the Normal Operating Range • +/- 5% in the Extended Low Flow Height Height from Center Pipe Weight * In the water temperature of 45° to 85° F (7° to 30° C), meter consumption is accurately measured at: Octave Operating Characteristics and Dimensions Safe Maximum Operating Capacity Normal Operating Range (98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy)* Extended Low Flow (95% - 105% Accuracy) Length Width MMPCS090111 The Octave vs. Compounds & Turbines Product Comparison Sheet The origin of the modern day turbine meter dates back to the late 18th century and has evolved into a reliable way of measuring high volumes of water. Since 1914 compound meters have served a place in the market by capturing unaccounted for water in many applications when compared to traditional turbine meters. While changes in both designs have improved meter accuracy there is still room for improvement due to poor low flow registration (in turbines), costly repairs, head loss, decreased accuracy in the changeover flow rates (in compounds), and short term sustained accuracy. With the introduction of the Octave ultrasonic water meter, the industry now has a meter capable of accurately measuring both high volume water usage while still capturing low flows and providing leakage alerts with none of the limitations of a compound or turbine. Benefits: 1. No moving parts: Compound meters require water to be measured through 2 separate measuring elements; one for high flows and a secondary meter for low flows. In addition the compound meter requires an automatic valve mechanism for diverting flow through the appropriate measuring device. Traditional compound meters can have upwards of 50-75 moving parts. Turbine meters have one measuring element for capturing intermediate and high flows. Most turbine meters can have upwards of 25 moving parts. The Octave meter has absolutely no moving parts and thus eliminates the need of any maintenance or repair or the requirement of installing a strainer. However if the utility would like to prevent larger suspended particles from entering the customer’s line a strainer may be installed without adversely affecting the meter. 2. Sustained meter accuracy: As with all mechanical devices, compound and turbine meters are subject to damage or wear which has a negative effect on meter accuracy and the utility’s revenue. Using the latest in ultrasonic transit time technology the Octave meter is capable of maintaining new meter accuracy for the life of the meter without the need for calibration or routine maintenance. 3. Low flow accuracy & starting flow: With flow sensitivity starting as low as 1/16 gpm, the Octave is the only solid state meter capable of matching the minimum test flow rates of the AWWA standard for compound meters (2” – 4”) and far exceeds the low flow rates of the AWWA standard for typical turbines (all sizes). Size Octave Low Flow *C701 Low Flow ** C702 Low Flow 2” ¼ gpm @ 95% 4 gpm @ 98.5% ¼ gpm @ 95% 3” ½ gpm @95% 8 gpm @ 98.5% ½ gpm @ 95 % 4” ¾ gpm @95% 15 gpm @ 98.5% ¾ gpm @ 95% 6” 2 gpm @ 95% 30 gpm @ 98.5% 1 ½ gpm @ 95% 8” 4 gpm @ 95% 50 gpm @ 98.5% 2 gpm @ 95% *C701 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Turbine Type **C702 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Compound Type 4. No changeover: An inherent weakness with compound meters is the point when flow begins to changeover from one chamber to the other. Depending on the make and model, meter accuracy can drop as low as 90% on older compound models and approximately 94% - 97% on newer compound models. The Octave eliminates changeover and provides optimal meter accuracy at all flow that should result in more revenue for the utility. 5. High flow: Occasionally a compound is not the right meter for the job when a customer’s flow demand exceeds the meter’s safe maximum flow. To prevent unwanted wear to the compound the utility would typically install a turbine meter and hope the customer was not also operating below the meter’s low flow capacity during non-peak demand. The Octave meter allows you to accurately measure both low and high flows without sacrificing meter accuracy. MMPCS090111 Size Octave Safe Maximum Flow *C701 Safe Maximum Flow *C701 % of Improvement **C702 Safe Maximum Flow **C702 % of Improvement 2” 250 gpm 190 gpm 24% 160 gpm 36% 3” 500 gpm 435 gpm 13% 350 gpm 30% 4” 1,000 gpm 750 gpm 25% 600 gpm 40% 6” 1,600 gpm 1,600 gpm 20% 1,350 gpm 32.5% 8” 2,800 gpm 2,800 gpm 20% 1,600 gpm 54.3% *C701 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Turbine Type **C702 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Compound Type 6. Head loss: With no internal parts to cause friction the Octave by design decreases head loss which in turn lowers pumping costs for the utility and decreases the number of complaints of poor pressure by the customer. Compared to a typical compound meter, the head loss of the Octave can decrease head loss by up to 93% at comparable flow rates and up to 90% in turbines. At C701 Safe Max Flow Improvement At C702 Safe Max Flow Improvement Size Turbines vs. Octave vs. Turbines Compounds vs. Octave vs. Compounds 2" 5.08 PSI 0.80 PSI 84% 7.05 PSI 0.74 PSI 90% 3" 5.44 PSI 2.00 PSI 63% 6.88 PSI 1.15 PSI 83% 4" 7.30 PSI 3.00 PSI 59% 8.90 PSI 1.89 PSI 79% 6" 6.14 PSI 0.69 PSI 89% 8.32 PSI 0.55 PSI 93% 8" 3.48 PSI 1.87 PSI 46% 7.70 PSI 0.66 PSI 91% #Head loss improvements are determined by taking an average head loss for each meter type at the Safe Maximum Flow per the applicable standard then comparing it to the Octave at the same rate of flow. Results vary based on the specific model when compared to the Octave. 7. Meter Oversizing / Undersizing / Improper Application: Lost revenue and/or meter damage can occur if the meter is not sized properly or if the meter installed is not best suited for the customer’s usage profile. The Octave operates well in almost every application, eliminating the question of which meter to use or what size to use. 8. Technology: The Octave comes with built in standard display alerts such as leak detection, flow direction, empty pipe, and battery level icon, and offers the scalability to include data logging, impact alerts such as tampering, backflow, theft and zero consumption when connected to Master Meter’s XTR endpoint. The technology advantages of the Octave far exceed the capabilities of today’s compound and turbine meters. 9. Weight: Less parts needed to build a meter equates to manufacturing a meter that weighs considerably less than compounds and turbines resulting in reducing the number of field staff and equipment needed to install or replace meters and environmental benefits such as reducing your carbon footprint. Size Octave Weight ##Turbine Avg. Weight Improvement vs. Turbine ##Compound Avg. Weight Improvement vs. Compound 2" 26 lbs 25 lbs +4% 39 lbs 33% 3" 36 lbs 40 lbs 10% 68 lbs 47% 4" 48.5 lbs 54 lbs 10% 86 lbs 44% 6" 99 lbs 108 lbs 8% 155 lbs 36% 8" 136 lbs 186 lbs 27% 379 lbs 64% ## Comparisons of weight are between various compound and turbine models. The level of improvement was based on average weight per size and type. Results vary based on the specific model when compared to the Octave. 10. Price: For all of these added features you would expect to pay much more for a superior product but that is not the case. Priced between a turbine and a compound the Octave exceeds all the advantages of a traditional compound or turbine. Octave Installation Guide Category: C & I Metering Type: Installation Manual Issue: Operation Version 01.19  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 2 of 16 Table of Contents Octave Installation Manual 1 General Information Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Package Contents 3 3. General Safety 3 4. Unpacking Instructions 3 2 Technical Data 1. Measurement Method 4 2. Mechanical Data 4 3. Dimensions and Scaled Drawings 5 4. Performance Data 5 5. Pressure Loss Charts 6 3 Installation Requirements 1. Pre-Installation 7 2. Handling the Octave 7 3. Installation Notes 7 4. Installation Location & Position 8 5. Additional Installation Requirements 9 4 Register Display and Output 1. Digital Display 10 2. Pulse Output (Open Drain) 11 3. Pulse Output (SSR Dry Contact) 12 4. 4-20 mA (Analog) 13 5. Encoder Output (Serial) 14 6. No Output (Manual read) 14 7. Installation of Output Module 15 8. Wire Connectivity Chart 16  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 3 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 1 – General Information 1.1 Introduction Thank you for choosing Master Meter’s Octave Ultrasonic Meter. This unique design delivers precise flow measurement without any moving parts for long life, sustained accuracy and exceptional performance. The following information within this guide will help you gain a better understanding of the many features and capabilities your new Octave Ultrasonic meter has to offer. 1.2 Package Contents and Documentation • One complete Octave Ultrasonic Flow Meter (meter body with integral electronics), size as indicated on the packaging box. • Octave User Installation Guide • Certificate of calibration data (adhered to the inside of the meter lid) • (Optional) If specified at the time of order; one output module 1.3 General Safety Prior to installation of your new Octave Ultrasonic Meter please consider the following; • Do not install, operate or maintain this flow meter without reading, understanding and following the factory-supplied instructions. Otherwise, injury or damage may result. • Read instructions carefully before beginning installation and save them for future reference. • Observe all warnings and instructions marked on the product. • Consider handling and lifting instructions to avoid damage. • If the product does not operate normally, refer to the service instructions or to a qualified Master Meter representative. • There are no operator-serviceable parts inside this product. 1.4 Unpacking Instructions and Inspection This product has been thoroughly inspected and tested prior to shipment and is ready for operation. After carefully unpacking the meter, inspect all contents for shipping damage before attempting to install. If here is any indication of physical damage found, immediately contact the responsible transportation service and your local Master Meter representative. Note: The LCD display remains active for the life of the meter. If the display is not on, this may be an indication of damage during shipment.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 4 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.1 Measurement Method The Octave’s measurement method is based on an ultrasonic, transit time, dual beam sensor array which determines the length of time it takes an ultrasonic sound wave to travel the distance between the two sensors located in the meter’s body. The two sensors function as both the transmitter and the receiver, each one alternating these functions so that the ultrasonic wave travels both with and against the direction of the flow. Ultrasonic waves travel slower against the flow than with the flow, thus the time difference of two waves traveling with and against the flow leads to determining the velocity and volume of the water. Note: These sensors are ultra-sensitive; they are not designed to be modified by the user. Any modifications void warranty on this product. • The Octave ultrasonic flow meter is a battery-powered, precision flow meter designed for linear, bidirectional flow measurement of water. • Flow measurement data is communicated through the output module. • The Octave can be set up for a wide range of applications. 2.2 Mechanical Data Maximum Working Pressure 175 PSI Liquid Temperature 32.1° F - 122° F (0.1° C to 50° C) Referenced Standards Meets ANSI / AWWA Standard C715-18 & C750-10; ISO 4064 rev. 2005 Configuration Compact - Display built into unit Power Source 2 x D size Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries - 10 year warranted life time Environmental Protection NEMA 6P (IP68), Ambient operation temperature -13° F to 131° F (- 25° C to 55° C) Data Units Multi-line 12 digit Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) - Programmable USG, Imperial Gallons, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Barrels, Acre Feet or Acre Inch for Volume and GPM, Lt/s,Lt/m or M3/h for rate of flow. Volume Display Options 1. Net Volume (Forward measurement minus reverse) 2. Forward Only 3. Alternating Flow (Forward and Reverse flow displayed separately) Flanges ANSI / AWWA C702 • 2” Oval Type – Cast Iron Floating Flange • 3” – 8” Round Type – Cast Iron Floating Flange • 8 – 12” Round Type – Cast Iron Fixed Flange Meter Body Construction 2” – 8” Grade 316 Stainless Steel 10” – 12” Ductile Iron Epoxy Coated Output (optional) 1. Dual Digital Pulses (Open Drain or Dry Contact) 2. 4-20 mA (Powered loop) 3. Encoder Output (up to 8 digit encoded readings) Certifications/Listings • UL Certified – Safety US EX29710 on 2” – 8” Stainless Steel Floating Flange • FM Approved on 2” – 12” Stainless Steel and Ductile Iron • ANSI / NSF 372 (AB1953 or NSF61G)  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 5 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.3 Dimensions 2.4 Performance Data Model 2" x 10"2"x13"2"x15.25"2"x17"3"4"6"8"10"12" (50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(80 mm)(100 mm)(150 mm)(200 mm)(250 mm)(300 mm) 10"13"15.25"17"12"14"18"20"17 3/4"19 3/4" (250 mm)(330 mm)(390 mm)(432 mm)(305 mm)(356 mm)(457 mm)(508 mm)(451 mm)(502 mm) 5 3/4"5 3/4"5 3/4"5 3/4"7 1/2"9"11"13 1/2"16"19 3/4" (146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(190 mm)(229 mm)(280 mm)(343 mm)(406 mm)(502 mm) 6 3/4"6 3/4"6 3/4"6 3/4"8 1/2"9 7/8"10 7/8"12 7/8"16 1/2"19 3/4" (172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(216 mm)(250 mm)(276 mm)(327 mm)(419 mm)(502 mm) 2 1/8"2 1/8"2 1/8"2 1/8"3 1/2"4 1/2"5 1/8"6 3/8"8"9 7/8" (54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(90 mm)(115 mm)(130 mm)(162 mm)(203 mm)(251 mm) 150 lbs.210 lbs. (68 kg)(96 kg) 15 lbs 20 lbs 22 lbs 24 lbs 23 lbs 35 lbs.51 lbs. 78 lbs. (7 kg)(9 kg)(10 kg)(11 kg)(10.5 kg)(16 kg)(23 kg)(35 kg) 2" Octave is offered in 10" length with an optional add-on of a 3", a 5.25" or a 7" spool. Gaskets, nuts, bots, & washers are included in weights of 13", 15.25" and 17". Octave - - C - Center Pipe Height Weight - Stainless Steel Weight - Ductile Iron - ------- W - Width H - Height Nominal Size L - Length Solid FlangeFloating Flanges Octave Extended Low Flow Normal Flow Range ‡ Continuous Linearity Range Nominal Size 95% - 105% Accuracy 98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy Safe Max Flow +/- 0.5% Maximum Deviation inch (mm)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s) 2"(50mm)1/4(.016)1/2 - 250(.032 - 15.77)250(15.77)4 - 200(.25 - 12.62) 3"(80 mm)1/2(.032)1 - 500(.06 - 31.54)500 (31.54)5 - 350(.32 - 22.08) 4" (100 mm) 3/4 (.047) 1-1/2 - 1,000 (.09 - 63.09) 1000 (63.09) 15 - 700 (.94 - 44.16) 6" (150 mm) 2 (.13) 3 - 1,600 (.19 - 100.94) 1,600 (100.94) 20 - 1,150 (1.26 - 72.55) 8"(200 mm)4(.25)5 - 2,800(.32 - 176.65)2,800(176.65)50 - 2,000(3.15 - 126.18) 10" (250 mm) 8 (.50) 14 - 5,500 (.88 - 346.99) 5,500 (346.99) 400 - 4,000 (25.24 - 252.36) 12" (300 mm) 8 (.50) 14 - 5,500 (.88 - 346.99) 5,500 (346.99) 400 - 4,000 (25.24 - 252.36) ‡ Continuous Safe Max Flow ranges listed for the Octave are for accurate flow measurement only and do not limit the Octave from meeting the Short-term Deluge Flow for fire services.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 6 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.5 Pressure Loss Charts  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 7 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.1 Pre-Installation Prior to installation check the following: • Flow rate and volume units are correctly programmed. • The flow meter is correctly installed per the installation location and position recommendations. • Output modules are correctly attached. 3.2 Handling of Octave IMPORTANT: • DO NOT use chains or wire cable to lift the Octave. To protect the epoxy coating, only use a nylon lifting strap with appropriate weight capacity. • DO NOT lift the Octave by the electronic housing unit. • DO NOT carry the Octave by its lid. • DO NOT use bolt holes for grip when carrying the Octave. • DO NOT position the flow meter on its electronic housing unit. • When bolting the meter to pipe flanges, use washers on both nuts and bolts to protect the epoxy coating of the Octave. • When handling the flow meter avoid hard blows, jolts or impact. 3.3 Installation Notes The measuring tube should be completely full at all times for proper flow measurements. When sensors are not wet this will show a loss of signal. Though this will not cause damage to the meter, it will however not measure flow. FLOW DIRECTION: The Octave is a bi-directional flow meter. Note the indicating arrow for forward and backward flows. Master Meter recommends keeping the lid closed in case of direct sunlight exposure. However, no direct damage will occur while the lid is open temporarily. Do not expose the meter to excessive vibration. To prevent this from occurring, support the connection pipe spools on both ends of the flow meter. To avoid measuring errors due to air or an empty pipe, please observe the following precautions: • Installation of the flow meter should be at the lowest point of the system, if possible, since air will be collected at the highest point of a system. • If possible, maintain positive back pressure in meter outlet piping. • In order to avoid cavitation, always install control valves downstream of the flow meter and never install the flow meter on a pump suction side.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 8 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.4 Installation Location & Position Proper Installation Improper Installation Conditional Installation Recommended: If this is not the highest point in the system or a hydraulic jump has been installed to keep the flow meter full. The system has back pressured. Not recommended: If this is the highest point in a system or if pipeline and/or flow meter is subject to being emptied between uses avoid this installation.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 9 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.5 Additional installation requirements Two (2) pipe diameters before & after elbows (90°) Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before or after isolation valves Open bore valves, such as resilient wedge gate valves can be bolted directly to the meter. Minimum of ten (10) pipe diameters after pump discharge. Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before tee connections, including test tees. Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before or after strainers for ISO version Octaves (primarily sold outside North American Market). AWWA length Octaves (primarily sold in North American markets) may be bolted directly to a strainer. Two (2) pipe diameters before and after elbows (90°) in vertical installations  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 10 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.1 Digital Display The Octave meter comes with a factory programmable digital display built to your specifications. At the time of order you can select: • Volume units in US gallons, Imperial gallons, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Barrels, Acre Feet or Acre Feet o US Gallons will display a constant GAL on the LCD o Imperial Gallons will display a constant IGAL on the LCD • Rate of flow measurement in US Gallons per Minute, Imperial Gallons per Minute, Liters per Second, Liters per Minute or Cubic Meters per Hour • A programmable decimal with flow measurement as low as 1/1000th of a measurement unit. • Single output mode in either encoder (UI1203), digital pulse (open drain or dry contact), 4-20 mA, or no output mode • Dual output mode (optional) in encoder + open drain digital pulse • Volume Display Option in either Net Flow, Forward Only, or Alternating. o Net Volume – The meter measures both forward and reverse flow. If backward flow is detected, the totalizer will begin to decrease. o Forward Flow Only – The meter measures forward flow only. Reverse flow is disregarded. o Alternating Flow – The totalizer will display only forward flow, then toggle to display only reverse flow. The timing of the how long each measurement is displayed is programmable with this software version. Flow Direction Communication Volume Units Flow Rate Units Empty Pipe / Error Pulse Resolution Accumulation Mode Water Temperature Alarms / Alerts Additional Output Modes Sleep Mode – After 24 hours of an empty pipe the meter will switch to sleep pipe. Checksum – After 1 minute of no flow, the meter will flash a series of letters and numbers in place of the rate of flow to show the checksum of the software version.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 11 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.2 Pulse Output (Open Drain) Pulse Type: Open Drain that allows current loading of 200 mA, and up to 30 VDC. Output Type Open drain Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Maximum Supply Voltage 30 VDC Wire Color Function Long cable Red Pulse Out #1 Green Pulse Out #2 Black Common Bare Wire Shield Pulse Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics Warning: Signal connection polarity is mandatory * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 12 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.3 Pulse Output (SSR Dry Contact) Pulse Type: Dry Contact that allows current loading of 120 mA, and up to 35 volts. Output Type SSR Dry Contact Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Output Voltage max. + 400 (V) Output Current max. 120 mA (.12 A) Supply Voltage 3-35 VDC Wire Color Function Long cable Red Output #1 Orange Output #1 Black Output #2 Brown Output #2 Short cable Red 24V + Black 24V - Yellow GROUND Pulse Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics Warning: Signal Polarity is mandatory on Short Cable wires but is not mandatory on Long Cable wires. * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 13 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.4 4-20 mA Output (Analog Communication) The current output is a passive 4-20 mA. Power must be provided by the customer. 4 mA is always “0” (zero) flow and the 20 mA is factory programmable according to the customer’s requirements. (If the customer has not specified the 20 mA at the time of order, the Octave will be programmed with the 20 mA at the max flow of the meter.) Output Type 4-20 mA passive current output Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Loop Supply Voltage 12 - 24 VDC Output Impedance 25 (mΩ) typ. Wire Color Function Long cable Red Current loop + Black Current loop - Bare Wire Shield Warning: Signal connection polarity is mandatory 4-20 Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 14 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.5 Encoder Output • UI1203 encoder open communication, with a maximum reading up to 8 digits, depending on the programming of the attached output module • Encoder digits are represented by lines above each digit transmitted to an AMR or AMI on the volume totalizer. • Serial communication collector • Data output line is a solid state switch requiring external pull-up • AMI Type for Encoder is : 0 Wire Function Red Power Green Data Black Ground 4.6 No Output (Manual Read) The Octave meter can be programmed to not send a communication signal at the customer’s request; however Master Meter recommends selecting a communication mode for future migration to AMR or AMI. Output Type Encoder Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Supply Voltage 15 Vdc Maximum Power Load .04 Vdc Output Characteristics Encoder Module Wire Colors  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 15 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 2 Allen Screws 3mm x 20mm Washer Pic. 1 3mm Allen Key Octave Module Pic. 2 Pic. 3 Pic. 4 Pic. 5 Pic. 6 Pic. 7 Pic. 8 Pic. 9 4.7 Output Module Installation (Optional) All Octave water meters are shipped with either a cover plate or communication module installed on the side of each meter. Even if the meter is not going to be read by radio or some other electronic unit, it is important to leave one of these devices installed on the Octave to prevent damage to the communication port. Installing an Octave without a cover plate or communication module would void any warranty. If you received an Output Module separate from your Octave meter, please follow the steps below to ensure proper installation of the module. Read through these instructions before attempting to remove the cover plate. Your module came as a complete installation kit with the supplies shown in Pic. 1. Octave Output Module Installation Parts Step 1: Remove the Sealing Cap from the cover plate (Pic. 2). Step 2: Using the 3mm Allen Key provided, remove the cover plate (Pic. 3). Keep the cover plate and 3mm x 15mm screws for future use. The communication port is now exposed. (Pic. 4) Step 3: Place washer around the 4-prong plug of the output module. (Pic. 5 & 6) Step 4: Insert Output Module into the communication port (Pic. 7), with the cable pointing down. This will allow the slot inside the communication port to align with the groove on the module. Do not force the module into the communication port. This may cause damage to the pins. Secure into place using the 3mm x 20mm screws provided. Tighten until the screws stop. (Pic. 8) Step 5: Push the Sealing Cap into the lower screw hole (Pic. 9). Lock the Sealing Cap in place by firmly pushing in into place or gently tapping it in with a small hammer. Note: If at any time the module needs to be removed, take caution not to allow dirt or water into the communication port. If the module is going to be removed for an extended period of time, reinstall the cover plate and the 3mm x 15mm screws.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842-8000 MasterMeter.com Page 16 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.8 Wire Connectivity Chart The following chart is designed to assist in wiring the Octave module to various AMR/AMI Radios. The Octave transmits up to 8 digit output encoder output. Pulse output resolution is available in resolutions of x0.1, x1, x10, x1,000, or x10,000. By default Octave encoder modules are provided with Nicor connectors, however you may also select Itron Connectors, magnetic inductor coils for wall or pit mount, for bare wire. Nicor connectors are factory potted. All other connectors are spliced with water resistant heat shrink wrap. Manufacturer Model Communication Type Octave Red Wire Octave Green Wire Octave Black Wire Aclara Star 3000 Series Encoder Red White Black Star 3000 Series Pulse Red N/A Black or White Badger Orion Encoder Red Green Black Datamatic Firefly Encoder Red White Black Mosaic Encoder Red Green Black Elster MTU Encoder White Red Black MTU Pulse Red White Green Hersey Hot Rod Encoder Red Green or White Black Itron 60w Encoder Green Red Unshielded 60wp Pulse Red N/A White 100w Encoder Grey Brown Yellow Kemp Meeks Visu-Link VL-9S Pulse Polarity does not matter - Connect Red and Black Wires to either terminal, disregard green wire Visu-Link VL-9 Encoder Red Green Black Master Meter Allegro PT Encoder Red Green Black Universal XTR Encoder Red Green Black Fast Pulse XTR Pulse Red N/A Black Metron Farnier (T2) T2 M2w Encoder Red Green Black Neptune R900 Encoder Black Red Green Sensus MXU Pit Unit Encoder Red Green Black MXU Wall Unit Encoder Red Green Black Touch Pad Encoder Red Green Black *Note – when connecting to Master Meter’s Allegro PT or 3G XTR, the Octave will typically output an 8 digit reading, unless otherwise specified. When connecting to another manufacturer’s radio or read device, it is recommended to confirm with that provider what the actual reading resolution of the connecting device is. APPENDIX 32 - WILLDAN REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATIONS & SUMMARY November 25 2024 Mr. James Walters Finance Director City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Bldg. 2 Schertz TX 78154 Dear Mr. Walters: Per your request, we have completed a calculation of the credit from utility revenues that would be generated by new service units during the ten-year period of the City’s proposed water and wastewater impact fees. This credit to the growth-related cost component of the impact fee calculation is required under Local Government Code Chapter 395 to ensure that new service units are not double-charged for impact fee related capital improvements. Our scope of services is limited to this credit calculation; the City’s total water and wastewater impact fees are calculated by its consulting engineers. Summary Calculation Our credit calculation is summarized in the model presented as Appendix A to this letter. As shown in the appendix, we calculate the following impact-fee direct revenue credits: WATER Revenue Credit -- $3,365,530 WASTEWATER Revenue Credit -- $4,611,802 Key Assumptions As stated above, our contribution to the City’s impact fee calculations is limited to the water and wastewater revenue credit only; we bear no responsibility for the overall impact fee calculations. However, we coordinated our assumptions and calculations with City staff and the City’s consulting engineers. Specifically, we relied on the following critical assumptions in developing our revenue credits: 1) We assumed a ten-year period for the calculation, FY 2025 – FY 2034, consistent with guidelines set by Chapter 395. 2) We utilized Capital Improvement Plan cost estimates and percentages of each project allocable to growth developed by City staff and its consulting engineers. 3) Growth estimates were based on the latest forecasts as presented by the City’s consulting engineers. 4) Terms and interest rates for new debt forecast to be issued for growth-related improvements were based on estimates used in the City’s 2023 water and wastewater rate study. 5) We are interpreting Chapter 395 so that the debt allocable to growth-related projects includes both principal and interest. 6) Current debt allocable to growth-related projects was based on estimates provided by City staff. 7) The totals represent Net Present Values of the ten year cash flows utilizing a discount rate of 6.0%. In summary, we believe that the use of the revenue credits estimated in this summary letter and detailed in Appendix A are reasonable and in accordance with Chapter 395 guidelines. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you and the City of Schertz. Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Respectfully submitted, WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Dan V. Jackson Vice President APPENDIX A Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Revenue Credit Summary Calculation Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WATER LUEs Total LUEs 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 New LUEs Annual 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 WATER Debt Service Current Principal 1,057,500$ 880,000$ 450,000$ 470,000$ 492,500$ 515,000$ 537,500$ 560,000$ 562,500$ 495,000$ Interest 382,755 338,481 306,869 286,019 265,281 243,956 221,931 200,019 178,519 157,806 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255 1,218,481 756,869 756,019 757,781 758,956 759,431 760,019 741,019 652,806 Future Principal - 185,227 190,784 884,493 911,028 2,049,721 2,111,213 2,174,549 2,239,786 2,306,979 Interest - 149,314 143,757 692,627 666,092 1,534,643 1,473,151 1,409,814 1,344,578 1,277,384 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 334,541 334,541 1,577,120 1,577,120 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 Total Principal 1,057,500 1,065,227 640,784 1,354,493 1,403,528 2,564,721 2,648,713 2,734,549 2,802,286 2,801,979 Interest 382,755 487,795 450,625 978,645 931,373 1,778,599 1,695,082 1,609,833 1,523,097 1,435,190 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255 1,553,022 1,091,409 2,333,139 2,334,901 4,343,320 4,343,795 4,344,382 4,325,382 4,237,170 Utility Revenue Credit Calculation Total Debt Service 1,440,255$ 1,553,022$ 1,091,409$ 2,333,139$ 2,334,901$ 4,343,320$ 4,343,795$ 4,344,382$ 4,325,382$ 4,237,170$ Total LUEs 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 Debt Service Per LUE Annual 47.72$ 50.01$ 34.16$ 70.97$ 69.03$ 124.80$ 121.31$ 117.92$ 114.10$ 108.64$ Monthly 3.98$ 4.17$ 2.85$ 5.91$ 5.75$ 10.40$ 10.11$ 9.83$ 9.51$ 9.05$ New LUEs -- Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 Water Revenue Credit Current Dollars 4,108,768$ 40,454$ 86,018$ 89,408$ 251,296$ 310,005$ 682,462$ 785,375$ 885,445$ 978,303$ 1,050,448$ Net Present Value 6.0%3,365,530$ CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Revenue Credit Summary Calculation Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER LUEs Total LUEs 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 New LUEs Annual 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 WASTEWATER Debt Service Current Principal 642,500$ 680,000$ 710,000$ 745,000$ 782,500$ 815,000$ 847,500$ 880,000$ 892,500$ 835,000$ Interest 508,655 477,156 444,043 409,818 374,955 340,380 307,705 276,343 244,887 213,493 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155 1,157,156 1,154,043 1,154,818 1,157,455 1,155,380 1,155,205 1,156,343 1,137,387 1,048,493 Future Principal - 846,752 872,155 1,771,533 1,824,679 2,726,171 2,807,956 2,892,195 2,978,961 3,068,330 Interest - 682,576 657,174 1,334,916 1,281,770 1,909,606 1,827,821 1,743,582 1,656,817 1,567,448 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 1,529,329 1,529,329 3,106,449 3,106,449 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 Total Principal 642,500 1,526,752 1,582,155 2,516,533 2,607,179 3,541,171 3,655,456 3,772,195 3,871,461 3,903,330 Interest 508,655 1,159,732 1,101,216 1,744,734 1,656,725 2,249,986 2,135,526 2,019,925 1,901,703 1,780,941 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155 2,686,485 2,683,371 4,261,266 4,263,904 5,791,157 5,790,982 5,792,120 5,773,164 5,684,270 Utility Revenue Credit Calculation Total Debt Service 1,151,155$ 2,686,485$ 2,683,371$ 4,261,266$ 4,263,904$ 5,791,157$ 5,790,982$ 5,792,120$ 5,773,164$ 5,684,270$ Total LUEs 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 Debt Service Per LUE Annual 35.16$ 79.88$ 77.68$ 120.11$ 117.01$ 154.73$ 150.64$ 146.70$ 142.36$ 136.47$ Monthly 2.93$ 6.66$ 6.47$ 10.01$ 9.75$ 12.89$ 12.55$ 12.22$ 11.86$ 11.37$ New LUEs -- Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 Wastewater Revenue Credit Current Dollars 5,540,163$ 30,373$ 139,895$ 206,847$ 432,245$ 533,604$ 858,409$ 988,529$ 1,115,461$ 1,234,800$ 1,333,688$ Net Present Value 6.0%4,611,802$ Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Current 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 LUE and Account Totals Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER LUES Forecast Annual Growth Rate 2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9% Total LUEs 29,334 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 Annual New LUEs New LUEs 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 Monthly Bills 352,008 362,181 372,648 383,418 394,498 405,899 417,630 429,699 442,118 454,895 468,041 WASTEWATER LUES Forecast Annual Growth Rate 2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7% Total LUEs 31,880 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 Annual New LUEs New LUEs 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 Monthly Bills 382,561 392,929 403,577 414,514 425,747 437,285 449,136 461,307 473,809 486,649 499,837 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 1 Series: 2013 GO Refunding Bonds 1A Total Bond 2,160,000$ Principal 215,000$ 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1B Percent Water/WW Water 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Wastewater 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1C Water Debt Service Principal 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1D Water Percent Growth and Replacement Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774 - - - - - - - - - 1F Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1G Wastewater Percent Growth and Replacement Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 2 Series:2018 CO's 2A Total Bond 10,440,000$ Principal 2,910,000$ 235,000$ 250,000$ 260,000$ 275,000$ 290,000$ 300,000$ 310,000$ 320,000$ 330,000$ 340,000$ Interest 162,049 149,925 137,174 123,799 109,674 96,424 85,774 76,324 66,368 55,687 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 397,049$ 399,925$ 397,174$ 398,799$ 399,674$ 396,424$ 395,774$ 396,324$ 396,368$ 395,687$ 2B Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2C Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Replacement 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - 2F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 235,000$ 250,000$ 260,000$ 275,000$ 290,000$ 300,000$ 310,000$ 320,000$ 330,000$ 340,000$ Interest 162,049 149,925 137,174 123,799 109,674 96,424 85,774 76,324 66,368 55,687 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 397,049$ 399,925$ 397,174$ 398,799$ 399,674$ 396,424$ 395,774$ 396,324$ 396,368$ 395,687$ 2G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Replacement 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 3 Series:2018 GO and Refunding Bonds 3A Total Bond 8,570,000$ Principal 885,000$ 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375$ 461,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3B Percent Water/WW Water 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Wastewater 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3C Water Debt Service Principal 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375$ 461,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375 461,250 - - - - - - - - 3F Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 4 Series:2019 CO's 4A Total Bond 7,495,000$ Principal 1,730,000$ 145,000$ 155,000$ 160,000$ 165,000$ 170,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 185,000$ 195,000$ 200,000$ Interest 87,100 81,100 74,800 68,300 62,875 58,125 52,800 47,325 41,625 35,700 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 232,100$ 236,100$ 234,800$ 233,300$ 232,875$ 233,125$ 232,800$ 232,325$ 236,625$ 235,700$ 4B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4C Water Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050$ 118,050$ 117,400$ 116,650$ 116,438$ 116,563$ 116,400$ 116,163$ 118,313$ 117,850$ 4D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050 118,050 117,400 116,650 116,438 116,563 116,400 116,163 118,313 117,850 4F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050$ 118,050$ 117,400$ 116,650$ 116,438$ 116,563$ 116,400$ 116,163$ 118,313$ 117,850$ 4G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050 118,050 117,400 116,650 116,438 116,563 116,400 116,163 118,313 117,850 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 5 Series:2021 GO Refunding Bonds 5A Total Bond 6,015,000$ Principal 1,650,000$ 160,000$ 165,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 190,000$ 195,000$ 205,000$ 210,000$ 170,000$ -$ Interest 45,450 38,950 32,150 25,950 20,400 14,625 9,650 5,500 1,700 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 205,450$ 203,950$ 207,150$ 205,950$ 210,400$ 209,625$ 214,650$ 215,500$ 171,700$ -$ 5B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5C Water Debt Service Principal 80,000$ 82,500$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 95,000$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 105,000$ 85,000$ -$ Interest 22,725 19,475 16,075 12,975 10,200 7,313 4,825 2,750 850 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 102,725$ 101,975$ 103,575$ 102,975$ 105,200$ 104,813$ 107,325$ 107,750$ 85,850$ -$ 5D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0% Replacement 67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 26,400$ 27,225$ 28,875$ 29,700$ 31,350$ 32,175$ 33,825$ 34,650$ 28,050$ -$ Interest 7,499 6,427 5,305 4,282 3,366 2,413 1,592 908 281 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 33,899 33,652 34,180 33,982 34,716 34,588 35,417 35,558 28,331 - 5F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 80,000$ 82,500$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 95,000$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 105,000$ 85,000$ -$ Interest 22,725 19,475 16,075 12,975 10,200 7,313 4,825 2,750 850 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 102,725$ 101,975$ 103,575$ 102,975$ 105,200$ 104,813$ 107,325$ 107,750$ 85,850$ -$ 5G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0% Replacement 67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 26,400$ 27,225$ 28,875$ 29,700$ 31,350$ 32,175$ 33,825$ 34,650$ 28,050$ -$ Interest 7,499 6,427 5,305 4,282 3,366 2,413 1,592 908 281 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 33,899 33,652 34,180 33,982 34,716 34,588 35,417 35,558 28,331 - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 6 Series:2022 CO's 6A Total Bond 9,390,000$ Principal 2,095,000$ 165,000$ 175,000$ 185,000$ 195,000$ 205,000$ 215,000$ 225,000$ 235,000$ 245,000$ 250,000$ Interest 141,837 133,337 124,337 114,837 104,837 94,337 83,337 73,012 64,637 57,212 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 306,837$ 308,337$ 309,337$ 309,837$ 309,837$ 309,337$ 308,337$ 308,012$ 309,637$ 307,212$ 6B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6C Water Debt Service Principal 82,500$ 87,500$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 107,500$ 112,500$ 117,500$ 122,500$ 125,000$ Interest 70,919 66,669 62,169 57,419 52,419 47,169 41,669 36,506 32,319 28,606 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 153,419$ 154,169$ 154,669$ 154,919$ 154,919$ 154,669$ 154,169$ 154,006$ 154,819$ 153,606$ 6D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6% Replacement 57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 35,144$ 37,274$ 39,404$ 41,534$ 43,663$ 45,793$ 47,923$ 50,053$ 52,183$ 53,248$ Interest 30,210 28,400 26,483 24,459 22,329 20,093 17,750 15,551 13,767 12,186 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 65,354 65,673 65,886 65,993 65,993 65,886 65,673 65,604 65,950 65,434 6F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 82,500$ 87,500$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 107,500$ 112,500$ 117,500$ 122,500$ 125,000$ Interest 70,919 66,669 62,169 57,419 52,419 47,169 41,669 36,506 32,319 28,606 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 153,419$ 154,169$ 154,669$ 154,919$ 154,919$ 154,669$ 154,169$ 154,006$ 154,819$ 153,606$ 6G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6% Replacement 57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 35,144$ 37,274$ 39,404$ 41,534$ 43,663$ 45,793$ 47,923$ 50,053$ 52,183$ 53,248$ Interest 30,210 28,400 26,483 24,459 22,329 20,093 17,750 15,551 13,767 12,186 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 65,354 65,673 65,886 65,993 65,993 65,886 65,673 65,604 65,950 65,434 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 7 Series:2022A CO's 7A Total Bond 18,530,000$ Principal 4,365,000$ 345,000$ 365,000$ 380,000$ 400,000$ 420,000$ 445,000$ 465,000$ 490,000$ 515,000$ 540,000$ Interest 418,825 401,075 382,450 362,950 342,450 320,825 298,075 274,200 249,075 222,700 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 763,825$ 766,075$ 762,450$ 762,950$ 762,450$ 765,825$ 763,075$ 764,200$ 764,075$ 762,700$ 7B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 7C Water Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913$ 383,038$ 381,225$ 381,475$ 381,225$ 382,913$ 381,538$ 382,100$ 382,038$ 381,350$ 7D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913 383,038 381,225 381,475 381,225 382,913 381,538 382,100 382,038 381,350 7E Wastewater Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913$ 383,038$ 381,225$ 381,475$ 381,225$ 382,913$ 381,538$ 382,100$ 382,038$ 381,350$ 7F Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913 383,038 381,225 381,475 381,225 382,913 381,538 382,100 382,038 381,350 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 11 Series:Total Current Debt Service 11A Total Current Debt Service Principal 1,700,000$ 1,560,000$ 1,160,000$ 1,215,000$ 1,275,000$ 1,330,000$ 1,385,000$ 1,440,000$ 1,455,000$ 1,330,000$ Interest 891,410 815,637 750,911 695,836 640,236 584,336 529,636 476,361 423,405 371,299 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 2,591,410$ 2,375,637$ 1,910,911$ 1,910,836$ 1,915,236$ 1,914,336$ 1,914,636$ 1,916,361$ 1,878,405$ 1,701,299$ Water Total Debt Service Principal 1,057,500$ 880,000$ 450,000$ 470,000$ 492,500$ 515,000$ 537,500$ 560,000$ 562,500$ 495,000$ Interest 382,755 338,481 306,869 286,019 265,281 243,956 221,931 200,019 178,519 157,806 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255$ 1,218,481$ 756,869$ 756,019$ 757,781$ 758,956$ 759,431$ 760,019$ 741,019$ 652,806$ Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 956,544$ 774,499$ 338,279$ 353,734$ 370,013$ 387,968$ 404,248$ 422,203$ 435,233$ 423,248$ Interest 326,821 287,164 260,413 244,366 228,358 211,981 194,780 177,221 159,398 141,386 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,283,365$ 1,061,663$ 598,691$ 598,100$ 598,371$ 599,950$ 599,028$ 599,424$ 594,631$ 564,634$ Wastewater Total Debt Service Principal 642,500$ 680,000$ 710,000$ 745,000$ 782,500$ 815,000$ 847,500$ 880,000$ 892,500$ 835,000$ Interest 508,655 477,156 444,043 409,818 374,955 340,380 307,705 276,343 244,887 213,493 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155$ 1,157,156$ 1,154,043$ 1,154,818$ 1,157,455$ 1,155,380$ 1,155,205$ 1,156,343$ 1,137,387$ 1,048,493$ Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 306,544$ 324,499$ 338,279$ 353,734$ 370,013$ 387,968$ 404,248$ 422,203$ 435,233$ 423,248$ Interest 290,672 275,914 260,413 244,366 228,358 211,981 194,780 177,221 159,398 141,386 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 597,216$ 600,413$ 598,691$ 598,100$ 598,371$ 599,950$ 599,028$ 599,424$ 594,631$ 564,634$ Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER CIP NT-W1 Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement 27.0%73.0%763,000$ 206,010$ 556,990$ 254,333$ 254,333$ 254,333$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station and 3.0 MGD GST 0.0%100.0%8,600,000 - 8,600,000 2,866,667 2,866,667 2,866,667 - - - - - - - NT-W3 Ware - Seguin and Pump Station Operation Imp 0.0%100.0%175,000 - 175,000 58,333 58,333 58,333 - - - - - - - NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin 0.0%100.0%1,538,000 - 1,538,000 512,667 512,667 512,667 - - - - - - - NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab 0.0%100.0%455,556 - 455,556 151,852 151,852 151,852 - - - - - - - NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt 0.0%100.0%1,600,000 - 1,600,000 533,333 533,333 533,333 - - - - - - - NT-W7 Graytown to Pfeil 69.0%31.0%1,550,000 1,069,500 480,500 516,667 516,667 516,667 - - - - - - - NT-W8 FM 78 Water Line Replacement 22.0%78.0%875,000 192,500 682,500 291,667 291,667 291,667 - - - - - - - NT-W9 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow WL Replace 0.0%100.0%3,000,000 - 3,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - NT-W10 Robinhood Way WL Replacement 0.0%100.0%4,650,000 - 4,650,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 - - - - - - - 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension 100.0%0.0%4,788,000 4,788,000 - - - - 1,596,000 1,596,000 1,596,000 - - - - 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Imp 89.0%11.0%1,438,000 1,279,820 158,180 - - - 479,333 479,333 479,333 - - - - 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett DL to Lower Seguin 97.0%3.0%3,688,000 3,577,360 110,640 - - - 1,229,333 1,229,333 1,229,333 - - - - 2030-W4 Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replace & Imp 93.0%7.0%9,850,000 9,160,500 689,500 - - - 3,283,333 3,283,333 3,283,333 - - - - 2030-W5 Boenig Dr 6" WL Replace & Imp 69.0%31.0%6,388,000 4,407,720 1,980,280 - - - 2,129,333 2,129,333 2,129,333 - - - - 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Trans Main 100.0%0.0%32,075,000 32,075,000 - - - - 10,691,667 10,691,667 10,691,667 - - - - 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion I 33.0%67.0%5,213,000 1,720,290 3,492,710 - - - 1,737,667 1,737,667 1,737,667 - - - - 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Imp 100.0%0.0%6,063,000 6,063,000 - - - - 2,021,000 2,021,000 2,021,000 - - - - 2030-W9 PRV Installation for SW Pressure Plane 0.0%100.0%413,000 - 413,000 - - - 137,667 137,667 137,667 - - - - 2030-W10 River Rd WL Replace 58.0%42.0%2,325,000 1,348,500 976,500 - - - 775,000 775,000 775,000 - - - - 2030-W11 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W12 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W13 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W14 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W15 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W16 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Unfunded Water CIP 95,447,556 65,888,200 29,559,356 7,735,519 7,735,519 7,735,519 24,080,333 24,080,333 24,080,333 - - - - 69.0%31.0% 95,447,556 68,347,605 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 3,320,378$ 5,171,777$ 150,601$ 21,052,750$ 313,247$ 21,029,856$ 448,524$ 3,412,973$ 6,551,639$ 9,872,214$ Plus Interest 99,611 155,153 4,518 631,582 9,397 630,896 13,456 102,389 196,549 296,166 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ Annual LUEs 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Total Impact Fees 2,487,306 2,559,189 2,633,150 2,709,248 2,787,545 2,868,105 2,950,993 3,036,277 3,124,026 3,214,310 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 5,907,295 7,886,119 2,788,269 24,393,580 3,110,190 24,528,857 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 7,000,000 - 26,000,000 - 42,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 12,907,295 7,886,119 28,788,269 24,393,580 45,110,190 24,528,857 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Less Capital Improvement Plan 95,447,556 65,888,200 29,559,356 7,735,519 7,735,519 7,735,519 24,080,333 24,080,333 24,080,333 - - - - Ending Balance 5,171,777 150,601 21,052,750 313,247 21,029,856 448,524 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER CIP NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" Section 1 21.0%79.0%6,875,000$ 1,443,750$ 5,431,250$ 2,291,667$ 2,291,667$ 2,291,667$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" Section 2 0.0%100.0%2,925,000 - 2,925,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 - - - - - - - NT-S3 Town Creek V 24"23.0%77.0%10,425,000 2,397,750 8,027,250 3,475,000 3,475,000 3,475,000 - - - - - - - NT-S4 Upsize Lookout Line 20.0%80.0%3,838,000 767,600 3,070,400 1,279,333 1,279,333 1,279,333 - - - - - - - NT-S5 Upsize Tri County Line 25.0%75.0%2,084,800 521,200 1,563,600 694,933 694,933 694,933 - - - - - - - NT-S6 Cibolo West Main 83.0%17.0%16,213,000 13,456,790 2,756,210 5,404,333 5,404,333 5,404,333 - - - - - - - NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines 89.0%11.0%13,000,000 11,570,000 1,430,000 4,333,333 4,333,333 4,333,333 - - - - - - - NT-SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station 0.0%100.0%88,000 - 88,000 29,333 29,333 29,333 - - - - - - - NT-SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station 0.0%100.0%1,500,000 - 1,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - - NT-SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station 0.0%100.0%175,000 - 175,000 58,333 58,333 58,333 - - - - - - - 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line 67.0%33.0%2,025,000 1,356,750 668,250 - - - 675,000 675,000 675,000 - - - - 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Rd 8"5.0%95.0%1,338,000 66,900 1,271,100 - - - 446,000 446,000 446,000 - - - - 2030-S3 Union Pacific RR 8" - Sec 1 10.0%90.0%2,563,000 256,300 2,306,700 - - - 854,333 854,333 854,333 - - - - 2030-S4 Union Pacific RR 8" - Sec 2 12.0%88.0%400,000 48,000 352,000 - - - 133,333 133,333 133,333 - - - - 2030-S5 Wiederstein Rd -- 8"83.0%17.0%1,663,000 1,380,290 282,710 - - - 554,333 554,333 554,333 - - - - 2030-S6 Schaefer Rd 8" Sec 1 33.0%67.0%4,913,000 1,621,290 3,291,710 - - - 1,637,667 1,637,667 1,637,667 - - - - 2030-S7 Schaefer Rd 8" Sec 2 100.0%0.0%1,938,000 1,938,000 - - - - 646,000 646,000 646,000 - - - - 2030-S8 Aranda 8"100.0%0.0%475,000 475,000 - - - - 158,333 158,333 158,333 - - - - 2030-S9 Weir Rd 10"100.0%0.0%2,525,000 2,525,000 - - - - 841,667 841,667 841,667 - - - - 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Rd 10"100.0%0.0%1,038,000 1,038,000 - - - - 346,000 346,000 346,000 - - - - 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Rd 8"97.0%3.0%3,113,000 3,019,610 93,390 - - - 1,037,667 1,037,667 1,037,667 - - - - 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"40.0%60.0%400,000 160,000 240,000 - - - 133,333 133,333 133,333 - - - - 2030-S13 I-10 8" Section 1 99.0%1.0%2,713,000 2,685,870 27,130 - - - 904,333 904,333 904,333 - - - - 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"29.0%71.0%2,963,000 859,270 2,103,730 - - - 987,667 987,667 987,667 - - - - 2030-S15 N Greytown Rd 8"52.0%48.0%1,275,000 663,000 612,000 - - - 425,000 425,000 425,000 - - - - 2030-SI - 1 Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize 22.0%78.0%8,175,000 1,798,500 6,376,500 - - - 2,725,000 2,725,000 2,725,000 - - - - 2030-SI - 2 Fairlawn WW Upsize 9.0%91.0%1,375,000 123,750 1,251,250 - - - 458,333 458,333 458,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 3 Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize 4.0%96.0%1,288,000 51,520 1,236,480 - - - 429,333 429,333 429,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 4 Woodland Oak Drive Replacement 4.0%96.0%338,000 13,520 324,480 - - - 112,667 112,667 112,667 - - - - 2030-SI - 5 Old Wiederstein WW Upsize 61.0%39.0%5,050,000 3,080,500 1,969,500 - - - 1,683,333 1,683,333 1,683,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 6 Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade 5.0%95.0%7,838,000 391,900 7,446,100 - - - 2,612,667 2,612,667 2,612,667 - - - - 2030-SI - 7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station 0.0%100.0%463,000 - 463,000 - - - 154,333 154,333 154,333 - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Unfunded Wastewater CIP 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - 110,992,800 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 3,320,378$ 17,819,793$ 793,244$ 16,296,010$ 389,990$ 16,049,104$ 221,454$ 1,919,947$ 3,715,243$ 5,611,490$ Plus Interest 99,611 534,594 23,797 488,880 11,700 481,473 6,644 57,598 111,457 168,345 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ Annual LUEs 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Total Impact Fees 1,441,071 1,480,124 1,520,235 1,561,433 1,603,748 1,647,210 1,691,849 1,737,698 1,784,790 1,833,158 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 4,861,060 19,834,511 2,337,276 18,346,323 2,005,438 18,177,787 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 32,000,000 - 33,000,000 - 32,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 36,861,060 19,834,511 35,337,276 18,346,323 34,005,438 18,177,787 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Less Capital Improvement Plan 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - Ending Balance 17,819,793 793,244 16,296,010 389,990 16,049,104 221,454 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Total CIP Total Water Unfunded CIP 95,447,556$ 65,888,200$ 29,559,356$ 7,735,519$ 7,735,519$ 7,735,519$ 24,080,333$ 24,080,333$ 24,080,333$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Wastewater Unfunded CIP 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - Total Unfunded CIP 206,440,356 119,598,260 86,842,096 26,776,785 26,776,785 26,776,785 42,036,667 42,036,667 42,036,667 - - - - Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 6,640,756$ 22,991,570$ 943,845$ 37,348,760$ 703,237$ 37,078,961$ 669,978$ 5,332,920$ 10,266,883$ 15,483,704$ Plus Interest 199,223 689,747 28,315 1,120,463 21,097 1,112,369 20,099 159,988 308,006 464,511 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Annual LUEs NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Total Impact Fees 3,928,377 4,039,313 4,153,385 4,270,681 4,391,293 4,515,315 4,642,843 4,773,975 4,908,815 5,047,468 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions form Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions form Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 10,768,355 27,720,630 5,125,545 42,739,904 5,115,627 42,706,644 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 39,000,000 - 59,000,000 - 74,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 49,768,355 27,720,630 64,125,545 42,739,904 79,115,627 42,706,644 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Less Capital Improvement Plan 206,440,356 119,598,260 86,842,096 26,776,785 26,776,785 26,776,785 42,036,667 42,036,667 42,036,667 - - - - Ending Balance 22,991,570 943,845 37,348,760 703,237 37,078,961 669,978 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 Debt Financing Variables Issuing Cost Percentage 1.0% Initial Reserve Cost Percentage 2.0% Interest Rate 3.00% Term (Years)20 Annual Reserve Years Funded - Debt Issues Total Water 75,000,000$ 7,000,000$ -$ 26,000,000$ -$ 42,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater 97,000,000 32,000,000 - 33,000,000 - 32,000,000 - - - - - Total 172,000,000 39,000,000 - 59,000,000 - 74,000,000 - - - - - Percent Growth-Related 69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0% Growth-Related Debt Issues Water 51,773,091$ 4,832,155$ -$ 17,948,005$ -$ 28,992,931$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater 66,959,864 22,089,852 - 22,780,160 - 22,089,852 - - - - - Total 118,732,955 26,922,007 - 40,728,165 - 51,082,783 - - - - - CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2025 Principal 26,922,007$ -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 807,660 Total Debt 27,729,668 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 1,863,869 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Beginning Principal 27,729,668 26,697,688 25,634,750 24,539,923 23,412,251 22,250,750 21,054,403 19,822,166 18,552,962 Interest 831,890 800,931 769,042 736,198 702,368 667,522 631,632 594,665 556,589 Principal 1,031,979$ 1,062,939$ 1,094,827$ 1,127,672$ 1,161,502$ 1,196,347$ 1,232,237$ 1,269,204$ 1,307,280$ Interest 831,890 800,931 769,042 736,198 702,368 667,522 631,632 594,665 556,589 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ Percent Water/WW Water 17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9% Wastewater 82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 185,227$ 190,784$ 196,507$ 202,403$ 208,475$ 214,729$ 221,171$ 227,806$ 234,640$ Interest 149,314 143,757 138,033 132,138 126,066 119,812 113,370 106,735 99,901 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 846,752$ 872,155$ 898,319$ 925,269$ 953,027$ 981,618$ 1,011,066$ 1,041,398$ 1,072,640$ Interest 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 547,711 518,262 487,930 456,688 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ Total Less Principal 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 547,711 518,262 487,930 456,688 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2026 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Beginning Principal - - - - - - - - Interest - - - - - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2027 Principal 40,728,165$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 1,221,845 Total Debt 41,950,010 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 2,819,700 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Beginning Principal 41,950,010 40,388,811 38,780,775 37,124,499 35,418,534 33,661,391 31,851,533 Interest 1,258,500 1,211,664 1,163,423 1,113,735 1,062,556 1,009,842 955,546 Principal 1,561,199$ 1,608,035$ 1,656,276$ 1,705,965$ 1,757,144$ 1,809,858$ 1,864,154$ Interest 1,258,500 1,211,664 1,163,423 1,113,735 1,062,556 1,009,842 955,546 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ Percent Water/WW Water 44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1% Wastewater 55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 687,986$ 708,626$ 729,884$ 751,781$ 774,334$ 797,564$ 821,491$ Interest 554,593 533,954 512,695 490,798 468,245 445,015 421,088 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 873,213$ 899,410$ 926,392$ 954,184$ 982,809$ 1,012,293$ 1,042,662$ Interest 703,907 677,711 650,728 622,937 594,311 564,827 534,458 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ Total Less Principal 703,907 677,711 650,728 622,937 594,311 564,827 534,458 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2028 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Beginning Principal - - - - - - Interest - - - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2029 Principal 51,082,783$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 1,532,483 Total Debt 52,615,267 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 3,536,572 1 2 3 4 5 Beginning Principal 52,615,267 50,657,152 48,640,294 46,562,931 44,423,246 Interest 1,578,458 1,519,715 1,459,209 1,396,888 1,332,697 Principal 1,958,114$ 2,016,858$ 2,077,364$ 2,139,684$ 2,203,875$ Interest 1,578,458 1,519,715 1,459,209 1,396,888 1,332,697 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ Percent Water/WW Water 56.8%56.8%56.8%56.8%56.8% Wastewater 43.2%43.2%43.2%43.2%43.2% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 1,111,362$ 1,144,703$ 1,179,044$ 1,214,415$ 1,250,848$ Interest 895,882 862,541 828,200 792,828 756,396 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 846,752$ 872,155$ 898,319$ 925,269$ 953,027$ Interest 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ Total Less Principal 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2030 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 Beginning Principal - - - - Interest - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2031 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 Beginning Principal - - - Interest - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2032 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 Beginning Principal - - Interest - - Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2033 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 Beginning Principal - Interest - Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0% Wastewater 100.0% Total 100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Total Less Principal - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:Total Future Debt Service Water Future Debt Service Total Principal -$ 185,227$ 190,784$ 884,493$ 911,028$ 2,049,721$ 2,111,213$ 2,174,549$ 2,239,786$ 2,306,979$ Interest - 149,314 143,757 692,627 666,092 1,534,643 1,473,151 1,409,814 1,344,578 1,277,384 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 334,541 334,541 1,577,120 1,577,120 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 Wastewater Future Debt Service Total Principal -$ 846,752$ 872,155$ 1,771,533$ 1,824,679$ 2,726,171$ 2,807,956$ 2,892,195$ 2,978,961$ 3,068,330$ Interest - 682,576 657,174 1,334,916 1,281,770 1,909,606 1,827,821 1,743,582 1,656,817 1,567,448 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 1,529,329 1,529,329 3,106,449 3,106,449 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 APPENDIX 33 - IMPACT FEE COMPARISON SOURCES CITY OF BOERNE - 2023 NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES - 2022 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report New Braunfels Utilities ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2021, New Braunfels Utilities (NBU), authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis on the water and wastewater systems. The purpose of this report is to summarize the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and wastewater impact fees for NBU. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the update of water and wastewater impact fees. As part of this study, land use assumptions, growth projections, and water/wastewater loading criteria from the 2021 Water & Wastewater Master Plan Update by FNI were used to develop 10-year load projections for both the water and wastewater systems. Impact fee capital improvements plans (CIP) were developed for both systems to serve projected growth through 2032. The hydraulic models of the water and wastewater systems, along with pumping and storage planning criteria developed by FNI, were employed to calculate the percentage of each project’s capacity projected to be utilized in the 10-year planning period (2022-2032). A summation of each project’s estimated cost, including financing costs less credits for existing projects partially funded through rate increases, multiplied by the percentage of that project being utilized in the 10-year planning period was used to calculate a total impact fee eligible CIP cost for both water and wastewater. These costs were divided by the projected growth in living unit equivalents (LUE) for water and wastewater, respectively, to determine the maximum allowable impact fees. Table ES-1 and Table ES-2 summarize the maximum allowable impact fee calculations for water and wastewater, respectively. Table ES-3 shows the maximum allowable impact fee for each meter size distributed by NBU. Table ES-1 Maximum Water Impact Fee Calculation Water Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $228,540,978 Total Eligible Financing Costs $168,389,936 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $396,930,914 Total Impact Fee Credits ($837,433) Maximum Allowable Cost $396,093,481 Growth in Service Units 20,367 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee $19,448 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report New Braunfels Utilities ES-2 Table ES-2 Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation Wastewater Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $85,710,012 Total Eligible Financing Costs $37,415,837 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $123,125,849 Total Impact Fee Credits ($2,813,220) Maximum Allowable Cost $120,312,629 Growth in Service Units 19,269 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee $6,244 Table ES-3 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gallons per minute) Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Allowable Water Maximum Allowable Wastewater Maximum Allowable Total 5/8" 10 1.0 $19,448 $6,244 $25,692 1" 25 2.5 $48,620 $15,610 $64,230 1 1/2" 50 5.0 $97,240 $31,220 $128,460 2" 80 8.0 $155,584 $49,952 $205,536 3" 175 17.5 $340,340 $109,270 $449,610 4" 300 30.0 $583,440 $187,320 $770,760 6" 675 67.5 $1,312,740 $421,470 $1,734,210 8" 2,400 240.0 $4,667,520 $1,498,560 $6,166,080 10" 3,500 350.0 $6,806,800 $2,185,400 $8,992,200 CITY OF SEGUIN - 2023 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 Background In August 2022, the City of Seguin, Texas (City), authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis on the City’s water and wastewater systems, including a portion of the Spring Hills Water Supply Corporation (SHWSC) Service Area that will be transferred to the City as part of the ongoing Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) Transfer. The purpose of this report is to summarize the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and wastewater impact fees for the City of Seguin. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the establishment and update of water and wastewater impact fees. 2.0 Land Use Assumptions Population and land use are important elements in the analysis of water and wastewater systems. Through collaboration between FNI and the City, FNI developed growth projections using land use assumptions from the ongoing Seguin Comprehensive Plan and proposed development according to the City’s Planning Department to estimate service connections for the 2023 and 2033 planning periods. Table ES-1 presents the growth projections for the City of Seguin Water and Wastewater Service Areas including the CCN area to be transferred from SHWSC to the City, hereafter referred to as the “Transfer Area.” Table ES-1: Growth Projections Service Area 2023 Connections 2033 Connections Growth Rate Existing Water 8,272 11,012 2.90% Transfer Area 1,305 7,370 18.90% Water Total 9,577 18,382 6.74% Wastewater Total 10,741 28,319 10.18% 3.0 Capital Improvement Plan Water and wastewater impact fee capital improvement plans (CIP) were developed for the City of Seguin based on the land use assumptions and growth projections. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity to meet projected water demands and wastewater flows through 2033. The CIPs are based on recommendations from the 2022 Water and Wastewater Master Plans and include improvements identified to provide service to the Transfer Area. For each existing or proposed project, the impact fee eligible cost is calculated as a percentage of the project cost, based upon the portion of Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-2 the project’s capacity required to serve growth projected to occur between 2023 and 2033, the 10-year period used for impact fee analysis. The cost associated with the portion of projects required to serve growth beyond this 10-year period are not included in the current impact fee calculations but will be eligible for impact fee cost recovery in the next impact fee update. The total cost for each eligible project includes the project’s capital cost to serve 10-year growth, the projected finance cost for the capital improvements, and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the CIP. Table ES-2 shows a summary of the total capital cost and impact fee-eligible cost for all Impact Fee CIP projects for the Water and Wastewater Service Areas. Table ES-2: CIP Cost Summary Service Area Total Capital Cost of Impact Fee Eligible Projects Total 10-Year (2023-2032) Cost of Impact Fee Eligible Projects Water $173,881,062 $87,766,441 Wastewater $339,567,626 $194,769,279 4.0 Impact Fee Analysis According to Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of required capital improvements by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as the service equivalent to a water-only connection or a water/wastewater connection for a single-family residence. A wastewater service unit is defined as the service unit equivalent to a water/wastewater connection for a single-family residence. The current impact fee ordinance was adopted in 2020. This ordinance set the water impact fee for a single-family meter at $1,386.86 including a pass-through fee of $354.54 from Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) and the wastewater impact fee for a single-family meter at $7,757.77. This project is an update to the 2020 ordinance. Table ES-3 displays the updated maximum allowable impact fee per service unit for the Water and Wastewater Service Areas, including the $354.54 SSLGC pass-through fee. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-3 Table ES-3: Maximum Allowable Impact Fees Service Area Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Water $7,308 Wastewater $9,250 Sub-Total $16,558 SSLGC Water Supply Impact Fee $354 Total Maximum Allowable Impact Fee $16,912 CITY OF SAN MARCOS - 2018 2018 Update of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees for the City of San Marcos Table 8. Derivation of Alternative Maximum Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Amounts Capital Cost Optional Adjustments Highest of Option A Option B of New Service Rate 50%Cost Option A Item per LUE Credit Adjustment Option A Option B or B WATER Supply 2,495 $ 208 $ 1,247 $ 2,287 $ 1,247 Treatment 609 10 305 599 305 Pumping 128 18 64 110 64 Ground Storage 298 1 149 297 149 Elevated Storage 163 8 82 155 82 Transmission 455 113 228 342 228 Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost 10 10 10 Total Water 4,159 358 2,074 3,801 $2,085 $3,801 WASTEWATER Treatment 1,470 86 $ 735 $ 1,385 $ 735 Pumping 705 78 352 627 352 Interceptors 774 112 387 662 387 Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost 10 10 10 Total Wastewater 2,960 276 1,475 2,684 $1,485 $2,684 TOTAL WATER/WASTEWATER 7,119 634 3.549 6,485 $3,570 $6,485 The fee methodology was replicated for each major facility type in the utility system e.g., supply,treatment, pumping, elevated storage, ground storage, and transmission) so that the total fee amount is the sum of the component facility fees. This provides a basis for extending the fee to wholesale customers of the City or granting fee offsets if a developer cost-participates with the City on CIP projects. For comparison purposes, the current impact fees of other near-by cities are listed in Table 9. City ofSan Marcos 15 1.)January 2018 CITY OF AUSTIN - 2023 SAWS - 2024 2800 U.S. Hwy. 281 North • P.O. Box 2449 • San Antonio, TX • 78298-2449 • www.saws.org March 18, 2024 TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 necessitates the updating of the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) impact fees by June 2024. The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC), SAWS staff, and consultant Carollo Engineers began the update process for all water and wastewater impact fees in July 2023, and the CIAC finalized its recommendations in a findings report on January 31, 2024. The findings report and all other CIAC meeting documents are available at: www.saws.org/CIAC . The update involves a projection of increased demand and resulting increased capacity in the water and wastewater systems for the next ten-year planning period. The costs associated with the capacity necessary to serve the projected growth determine the impact fee rate. The CIAC recommended impact fees are show below. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED IMPACT FEES 2800 U.S. Hwy. 281 North • P.O. Box 2449 • San Antonio, TX • 78298-2449 • www.saws.org The recommended impact fees were approved by the SAWS Board of Trustees on March 5, 2024. It is anticipated that the San Antonio City Council will hold a public hearing and consider adoption of the recommended impact fees on May 16, 2024. When the recommended impact fees are approved by the San Antonio City Council, they are expected to become effective on June 1, 2024. The determination on whether current impact fees or the recommended impact fees will be charged for service to a particular property is based on the date of plat recordation. In accordance with current state law, the impact fees in effect at the time the plat is recorded are the fees that will be charged. An individual may pay current impact fees for a property prior to plat recordation under the following conditions: • The plat has been approved by the Planning Commission, • All impact fees are paid prior to the effective date of the new impact fees. If you have any questions concerning the update process, please do not hesitate to contact me at tlehmann@saws.org, 210-233-3492, or Bob Johnson at bobby.johnson@saws.org, 210-233-3493. Sincerely, Tracey B. Lehmann, P.E. Interim Vice President Engineering and Construction CITY OF PFLUGERVILLE - 2023 WATER IMPACT FEE CIP MAP / 0 7,000 14,0003,500 Feet Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community 2050-W5 2050-W7 2050-W4 2050-W1 2050-W6 2050-W2 2050-W3 2050-W8 2030-W8 2030-W9 2030-W5 2030-W9 2030-W7 2030-W4 2030-W3 2030-W2 2030-W10 2030-W6 2030-W1 NT-W1 NT-W8 NT-W7 Water CCN Boundary Existing Water Lines City Limits/ETJ Legend 2022 - 2050 Anticipated Development Water Line Improvements Pump Station Improvements Proposed PRV WASTEWATER IMPACT FEE CIP MAP / 0 7,500 15,0003,750 Feet Esri, NASA, NGA, USGS, FEMA, Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community NT-S1 NT-S3 NT-S5 NT-S4 NT-S6 NT-S7 2030-S15 2030-S14 2030-S13 2030-S12 2030-S11 2030-S9 2030-S10 2030-S8 2030-S7 2030-S6 2030-S5 2030-S2 2030-S1 2030-S4 2030-S3 2030 SI-5 2030 SI-1 2030 SI-6 2030 SI-2 2030 SI-3 2030 SI-4 2050 S-5 2050 S-1 2050 S-2 2050 S-3 2050 S-4 2050 SI-1 2050 S-6 Gravity Line No Improvement Lift Station City Limits / ETJ Sewer CCN Boundary Force Main Outfall Legend No Improvement Lift Station CIP Wastewater CIP