Loading...
02-04-2025 Agenda Packet       MEETING AGENDA City Council REGULAR SESSION CITY COUNCIL February 4, 2025                                 HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2025 at 6:00 p.m.          Call to Order   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Mark Davis)   Discussion and Action Items   Appointment of Mayor Pro-Tem - Discussion, consideration, and/or action regarding the confirmation, appointment, or election of the Mayor Pro-Tem. (Mayor/Council)   Proclamations   San Antonio Stock Show and Rodeo (Ms. Barbara Hall)   Employee Introductions   February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 1  Employee Introductions   Engineering: Donald Moreno-Engineering Inspector Police Department: Adam Rodriguez - Police Officer Public Works-Streets: Abel Valdez-Streets Maintenance Worker 1 Public Works-Utilities: Dean Fickling - Water/Wastewater Worker 1; Mark Shadle - Water/Wastewater Worker1   Presentations   Presentation of the FY 23-24 Parks & Recreation Annual Report (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum)   City Events and Announcements  Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James/S. Gonzalez) Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S. Williams) Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R. Gutierrez )   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Discussion by the Council of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes - Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on January 21, 2025, and the February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 2  1.Minutes - Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on January 21, 2025, and the minutes from the Special Meeting-Canvassing the Runoff Election on January 28, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney)   2.Resolution 25-R-016 - Authorizing a Public Library Interlocal Agreement for mutual access to CloudLibrary digital resources (S.Gonzalez/M.Uhlhorn)   3.Resolution 25-R-018 – Authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit a Notice of Intent for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) under the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Phase II MS4 General Permit TXR040000 for the City and other matters in connection therewith (B.James/K.Woodlee)   4.Resolution 25-R-019 Authorizing the submission of a Special Projects Grant application to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) for a Library Outreach Vehicle (S.Gonzalez/M.Uhlhorn)   5.Resolution 25-R-013 - Granting signature authority to the City Manager to enter into and sign certain contracts and documents on behalf of the City (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez/J.Kurz)   6.Resolution 25-R-020 - Authorizing a pro-rata agreement for the Saddlebrook Development (S.Williams/B.James)   7.Resolution 25-R-014 - Authorizing the Schertz Police Department to accept equipment from the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) RECONYX Illegal Dumping Cameras Program (J. Lowery)   8.Resolution 25-R-002 – Authorizing a professional services agreement with Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the design of the Boenig Drive Reconstruction Project (B. James/K. Woodlee/J. Nowak)   9.Resolution 25-R-009 - Authorizing an expenditure with SAMES Bastrop Ford for the acquisition of 7 police vehicles (B.James/D.Hardin/C.Hernandez)   Discussion and Action Items   10.Ordinance 25-S-005 Adopting a Compensation Schedule and Procedure for the City Council (R.Gutierrez/S.Williams)   11.Resolution 25-R-017 - Establishing a date for a Public Hearing on Amendments to the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Utilities (B.James/K.Woodlee)   February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 3    12.Resolution 25-R-005 - Approving a Utility Service Extension Request for the Woman Hollering Townhomes (B.James/K.Woodlee)   13.Ordinance 25-S-004 - Consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado)   14.Resolution 25-R-021 - Authorizing the approval of a Development Agreement with BFR LLC for the approximately 30 acre tract at FM 1518 and Woman Hollering Road (S.Williams/B.James)   Public Hearings   15.Ordinance 25-F-006 - Conduct a public hearing and consider an amendment to Ordinance 14-F-20 amending the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan which is incorporated adopted by reference in the Schertz Code or Ordinances, Chapter 90 Utilities, Article IV Mandatory Water Conservation, Section 90-119 Drought Contingency and Emergency Response Plan Adopted (B.James/L.Busch/Z.Eaton)   Workshop   16.Workshop Discussion on the Integration of Space Force into Veterans Memorial Plaza (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum)   17.Workshop Discussion on the upcoming Request For Proposal for Municipal Solid Waste (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez)   Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   18.Monthly Update - Major Projects In Progress/CIP (B.James/K.Woodlee)   19.Update on EcoBrite Cleaning Contract Changes   Requests and Announcements  Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff     Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda   City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council) February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 4    Adjournment   CERTIFICATION I, SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE ABOVE AGENDA WAS PREPARED AND POSTED ON THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARDS ON THIS THE 30TH DAY OF JANUARY 2025 AT12:00 P.M., WHICH IS A PLACE READILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE PUBLIC AT ALL TIMES AND THAT SAID NOTICE WAS POSTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CHAPTER 551, TEXAS GOVERNMENT CODE.    SHEILA EDMONDSON    I CERTIFY THAT THE ATTACHED NOTICE AND AGENDA OF ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CITY COUNCIL WAS REMOVED BY ME FROM THE OFFICIAL BULLETIN BOARD ON ________DAY OF ___________________, 2025. TITLE: _______________________________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services, please call 210-619-1030. The City Council for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into closed session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Closed Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and the presence of any subject in any Closed Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.    COUNCIL COMMITTEE AND LIAISON ASSIGNMENTS     Mayor Gutierrez Member Audit Committee Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Liaison Board of Adjustments Senior Center Advisory Board-Alternate   Councilmember Davis– Place 1 Member Interview Committee  Main Street Committee - Chair TIRZ II Board Liaison Parks & Recreation Advisory Board Schertz Housing Authority Board Transportation Safety Advisory Board Councilmember Watson-Place 2 Member Audit Committee Liaison Library Advisory Board Senior Center Advisory Board Councilmember Macaluso – Place 3 Member Interview Committee  Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Liaison TIRZ II Board February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 5  Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation-Ex-Officio                                                                                                   Animal Services Advisory Committee   Councilmember – Place 4 Member Hal Baldwin Scholarship Committee Investment Advisory Committee Liaison Schertz Historical Preservation Society   Councilmember Westbrook – Place 5 Liaison Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC)     Planning and Zoning Commission Schertz Historical Preservation Society Cibolo Valley Local Government Corporation (CVLGC)-Alternate                                                          Councilmember Heyward – Place 6 Member Animal Services Advisory Committee Audit Committee Interview Committee-Chair Investment Advisory Committee Main Street Committee Liaison Building and Standards Commission Economic Development Corporation - Alternate Senior Center Advisory Board   Councilmember Brown – Place 7 Member Main Street Committee Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) Liaison Economic Development Corporation      February 4, 2025  City Council Agenda                                Page 6  Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Appointment of Mayor Pro-Tem - Discussion, consideration, and/or action regarding the confirmation, appointment, or election of the Mayor Pro-Tem. (Mayor/Council) BACKGROUND On August 28, 2018, City Council amended their Rules of Conduct and Procedure (Ordinance 18-M-30) regarding the appointment of the Mayor Pro Tem. Below is the amended article: Article 5 Section 5.1 Appointment Procedure for the Mayor Pro Tem.  a. The Council will discuss, and with a majority vote, appoint the Councilmember to serve as the Mayor Pro Tem for the City. b. The appointed Mayor Pro Tem must be a Councilmember and must meet the qualifications of Section 4.02 of the City Charter. In addition, to be appointed to the position of Mayor Pro Tem, a Councilmember must be an elected member of Council and a member in good standing. c. Term dates for the Mayor Pro Tem position will begin in February and August of each year (the election dates offset by three (3) months). Terms will sequentially rotate according to Councilmember place. d. If the Councilmember that is up for appointment as Mayor Pro Tem is vacant or is held by a Councilmember who is not qualified to serve as Mayor Pro Tem, the Mayor Pro Tem appointment will go to the next qualified Councilmember.e. The position will have a term of office of six (6) months.f. The appointed Mayor Pro Tem may be removed by Council by a two-thirds (2/3) majority vote of the members of Council at any time during his or her term.g. Council reserves the right to alter this procedure at any time by resolution or rule. City Charter Section. Section 4.02    Qualifications.  The Mayor and each Councilmember must have attained the age of eighteen or older on the first day of the term of office applied for, be a registered voter of the City of Schertz, and have been a resident of the City for at least twelve consecutive months immediately preceding the deadline for filing for an application for a place on the ballot.    Section 4.05 Mayor and Mayor Pro-Tem.  The Mayor shall be the official head of the City government. He or she shall be the chairperson and shall preside at all meetings of the City Council. The Mayor may vote only in the event of a tie. He or she shall, unless another signatory is otherwise designated by the City Council, sign all official documents such as ordinances, resolutions, conveyances, grant agreements, official plats, contracts, and bonds. He or she shall appoint special committees as instructed by the City Council, with committee membership to be composed of nominees by the City Council. He or she shall perform such other duties consistent with this Charter or as may be imposed upon him or her by the City Council. The Mayor shall not have veto powers.   The Mayor Pro-Tem shall be a Councilmember appointed by the City Council for a term and pursuant to procedures established by the City Council from time to time. The Mayor Pro- Tem shall act as Mayor during the absence or disability of the Mayor and in this capacity shall have the rights conferred upon the Mayor. While acting as Mayor, the Mayor Pro-Tem may vote on any matter before the City Council.   RECOMMENDATION Council will discuss and consider the appointment of the next Mayor Pro-Tem regarding the above qualifications. Next in line to serve is Councilmember Heyward. If appointed, Councilmember Heyward will be sworn in as the new Mayor Pro-Tem on February 4, 2025. Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:San Antonio Stock Show and Rodeo (Ms. Barbara Hall) Attachments San Antonio Stock and Rodeo  “OFFICIAL RODEO SEASON” AND “LETS RODEO SAN ANTONIO” 2025 WHEREAS, the 76th annual San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo, one of the largest and most prestigious events in the Alamo City, will be held February 6 – 23, 2025 at the Freeman Coliseum; and WHEREAS, the San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo is “A volunteer organization that emphasizes agriculture and education to develop the youth of Texas”; and WHEREAS, since inception over $267 million has been committed by the organization to the youth of Texas in the form of scholarships, grants, endowments, auctions, calf scramble program and show premiums, with $12 million committed in 2024 impacting 18,000 students; and WHEREAS, the lifeblood of the organization is the over 7,000 volunteers, the corporate partners ad patrons who support the event and mission; and WHEREAS, in 2024, over 1.5 million visitors enjoyed exciting activates such as world-class entertainment, a carnival, educational exhibits, family activities and attractions, livestock and horse shows and sales, Mutton Bustin’, Calf Scramble, Xtreme Bulls and shopping for the entire family to enjoy. WHEREAS, on February 6, 2025, the San Antonio Stock Show & Rodeo will kick off with its livestock show to support its mission of educating future generations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Schertz through its Mayor, Ralph Gutierrez, and the City Council, hereby recognizes and proclaims February 6-23, 2025 as “Official Rodeo Season” and February 6, 2025 “Official Dress Western Day” in San Antonio, Texas IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of Schertz to be affixed this 4th day of February 2025. ____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor Agenda No.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Presentation of the FY 23-24 Parks & Recreation Annual Report (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) Attachments FY 23-24 Parks & Recreation Annual Report  A N N U A L R E P O R T FY 23-24FY 23-24 WHO WE ARE 21 FULL TIME STAFF 2 PART TIME STAFF 2 SEASONAL STAFF 250+ # OF VOLUNTEERS PARKS & RECREATION LEADERSHIP Lauren Shrum, Director Jared Montney, Park Superintendent Cassie Paddock, Recreation Manager Erin Matlock, Civic Center Manager Robert Dobratz, Park Supervisor PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPENT Lauren Shrum: TRAPS Central Region Director Emerging Leaders Mentor AAPRA Mentor Erin Matlock: TxAFV Treasurer Cassie Paddock: TRAPS F&YP Chair NRPA YPN Chair NRPA Young Professional Fellowship Jared Montney: Emerging Leaders Mentor Sydney Paredes: F&YP Central Region Rep Emerging Leaders Texas Master Naturalist Class Kathryn Scheel: Emerging Leaders TRAPS C- Region Awards Committee TRAPS State Awards Committee Albert Orosco: Emerging Leaders CITY MANAGER COINS Parks Crew- Wendy Swan Sydney Paredes- Programming AWARDS Lauren Shrum: Terry Hershey Award Larry May: Truck & Trailer 3rd Place Cole Moody: Truck & Trailer 3rd Place Ian King: Backhoe Competition 6th Place WSMP: Excellence in Maintenance Johnie McDow: Individual of the Year Foam Party: Photography Award SERVICE PINS Traci Paprocki: 20 Years Albert Orosco : 15 Years Sydney Paredes: 1 Year Kat Scheel: 1 Year Daniel Delong: 1 Year Jeremy Jacoway: 1 Year Lonnie Corso: 1 Year Certifications Archery Trainer Sydney Paredes Archery Instructor Cassie Paddock Cody Harkins Aubrey McCardle TEAM ACCOMPLISHMENTS PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD SCHERTZ YOUTH SOCCER ALLIANCE BUFFALO VALLEY YOUTH ASSOCIATION SENIOR CENTER ADVISORY BOARD BOARDS & COMMITTEES Johnie McDow, Chair William Bosch, Vice Chair Reginna Agee Sally Macias Robert Sheridan III Brad Snow James Garvin Elizabeth Wiley Penny Jennings Christopher Castoro Tim Dusek Sabrina Sheridan Jason Hernandez Michelle Hernandez Dora Boyle Damani Phillips Demetrius Hopson Cassie Paddock Jared Montney Sydney Paredes Jason Hahn Barton Bowers Daniel Hernandez Gerald Connell Matt Netherton Ashley Underwood Lillian Redus Brad Marshall Nick Morales Jay Walkup Christopher Castoro Mary Wigle Linda Powell Adela Lugo Della Morgan Tess Daniels FRIENDS OF CRESCENT BEND Debby Arnold Gary Arnold Bill Skinner Sandi Wheeler Branch Archer Ardell Winters Paula Oliver Ann Mallard Steve Layton Clare Layton WHAT WE DO 12 BASEBALL & SOFTBALL FIELDS 2 SPLASH PADS 36 PLAYSCAPE UNITS 7 MULTIPURPOSE COURTS 4 WATER ACCESS POINTS 27 PARKS 1 DOG PARK 457 ACRES OF PARKLAND 2 COMMUNITY CENTERS 13 SPONSORS 12 PAVILIONS & PICNIC AREAS 1 SKATE PARK 25.6 MILES OF HIKE & BIKE TRAILS 995 CIVIC CENTER BOOKINGS 4 ADULT SOCIAL LEAGUES 2525 NATURE PROGRAMS 1 CIVIC/CONVENTION CENTER 1 SENIOR CENTER 12 PARTNER ORGANIZATIONS 12 SOCCER FIELDS 4 POOLS 41 EVENTS RECREATION Events Event Participants Programs Program Participants Leagues League Participants Sponsorships Volunteer Hours 41 28,426 123 1,750 5 540 $58,050 579 YOUTH SPORT PARTICIPANTS Baseball (BVYA) Softball (BVYA) Basketball (BVYA) Volleyball (BVYA) Swimming (BVYA) Soccer (SYSA) Volunteer Hours 936 291 255 89 140 1,329 22,220 AQUATICS- PICKRELL POOL Visits Admissions Season Passes 18,362 $22,244 $5,768 CIVIC CENTER RENTALS Grand Ballroom Bluebonnet Hall Community Center North Center 194 236 299 199 SENIOR CENTER Building Scan Ins Lunch Scan Ins Memberships Lunch Memberships Volunteer Hours 31,327 15,904 816 715 1,875.5 PARK RENTALS Ashley Park Pavilion Crescent Bend Group Campsite Gutierrez Garden Park Gazebo Pickrell Park- Large Pavilion Pickrell Park- Aero Pavilion Pickrell Park- Oak Pavilion Pickrell Park- Poplar Pavilion Pickrell Park- Picnic Area A Pickrell Park- Picnic Area B Pickrell Park- Picnic Area C Pickrell Park- Picnic Area D Rhine Valley Park Pavilion Wendy Swan Pavilion A Woodland Oaks Gazebo Veterans Memorial Plaza 21 3 3 158 58 82 63 10 9 11 9 8 2 3 1 THE YEAR IN NUMBERS 460- Parks (Parks and Recreation) 463- Swim Pool (Pickrell Park Pool & Splash Pad) 464- Event Facilities (Civic Center) 901- City’s Assistance (Senior Center) 106- Special Events Fund (Kick Cancer and Hal Baldwin Golf Tournament) 317- Park Fund 319- Tree Mitigation 460- Parks (Parks and Recreation) Personnel Services Operating Repairs and Maintenance Capital Improvements Expense Total: Budget 1,278,079.02 648,860.00 312,276.00 385,000.00 2,624,215.02 Actual 1,322,151.35 759,127.02 308,167.55 432,439.85 2,821,855.77 463- Swim Pool (Pickrell Pool & Splash Pad) Operating Contract Services Expense Total: Budget 82,500.00 587,052.00 669,552.00 Actual 103,146.89 568,771.35 671,771.35 464- Event Facilities (Civic Center) Personnel Services Operating Capital Improvements Expense Total: Budget 547,772.00 85,069.00 60,000.00 692,841.00 Actual 543,478.03 85,251.04 54,191.55 682,920.62 BUDGET EXPENSES Budget: $4,377,880.02 Actual: $4,614,183.96 901- City’s Assistance (Senior Center) Repairs and Maintenance Contract Services Expense Total: Budget 10,000.00 250,000.00 260,000.00 Actual 18,269.77 266,286.22 284,555.99 106- Special Events Fund (KC & HB) Operating Expense Total: Budget 45,000.00 45,000.00 Actual 71,651.23 71,651.23 317- Park Fund Capital Improvements Expense Total: Budget 100,000.00 100,000.00 Actual 0.00 0.00 319- Tree Mitigation Trees Expense Total: Budget 75,000.00 75,000.00 Actual 81,429.00 81,429.00 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Revenue From All Parks Department Funds Parks and Rec Fees Civic Center Fees Special Event Fund Fees Parkland Dedication Fees Tree Mitigation Fees Revenue Total: Budget 263,800.00 326,500.00 45,000.00 100,000.00 50,000.00 785,300.00 Actual 342,623.41 412,082.15 71,651.23 446,137.50 555,380.00 1,827,874.29 BUDGET REVENUES $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ FUNDING OUR PARKS TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE LOCAL PARK GRANT The Department secured a $750,000 local park grant from TPWD in early February of 2024. This grant requires a $750,000 value match from the City, which will be provided through a combined effort from area homeowners associations valued at $493,000, labor from the South Texas Off Road Mountain- Bikers valued at $15,000, and $241,100 from the parks and recreation budget. Plans for the Hilltop Park project include accessible concrete trails, an overlook area, a new playground, trails and other amenities. ALAMO AREA METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION The Department secured $1,000,000 in funds from AAMPO for the West Dietz Creek Trail project. This grant requires a $250,000 match from the city, which will come from dedicated trail development funds in the parks and recreation budget. The project includes the construction of a 1.76 mile long, 10 foot wide concrete trail beginning south of Wiederstein Road, crossing Savannah Drive and Maske Road, and ending at Schertz Parkway where it can connect with the Campus Exercise Trail behind the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex. SCHERTZ ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION The SEDC voted to invest nearly $12 million dollars in quality of life projects. The first tranche of funding will allocate $1.7 million in FY 2024-25 for the installation of field lights on 10 soccer fields at the Schertz Soccer Complex. In future years, the partnership with SEDC will focus on the development of Hilltop Park, a new nature-centric park in northern Schertz that will include the city’s first overlook/observation platform, a nature-based playscape, picnic pavilions, walking and biking trails, and a fishing pier. Finally, the most significant investment will be made to Community Circle Park located behind the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex. This new park will combine the Johnie McDow Sports Complex, the dog park, skate park, and many exciting new features to create a large recreational complex for the community. $1.5 M $1.25 M $12 M IMPROVING OUR PARKS HILLTOP PHASE 1 We are pleased to report that we have accepted the parkland dedication for what will be Phase 1 of the future Hilltop Park, situated in the Homestead neighborhood. This initial phase includes a loop trail and a pond equipped with a fishing pier, enhancing the recreational offerings for our community. Looking forward, we anticipate an official ribbon-cutting ceremony in early 2025 to celebrate this addition to our park system. CYPRESS POINT PARK In 2024, a ribbon cutting was hosted at Cypress Point Park for 2 added Shade Structures. This much needed shade was added to Cypress Point Park courtesy of grant funding from the San Antonio Council on Alcohol and Drug Awareness. SENIOR CENTER GARDEN ADDITON The Senior Center Garden Addition is officially complete with a new patio extension and additional raised beds that are now fully operational, providing our seniors with beautiful spaces to gather, socialize, and enjoy nature. Looking ahead to early FY 24-25, we are excited to introduce the final touches, including the installation of memorial tree art and the planting of fruit trees. These additions will further enhance the garden's beauty and functionality. ODDS AND ENDS This year, we've made several improvements across our parks to enhance both safety and usability. Insulated backflow covers were installed to protect against freezing, and additional safety surfacing was added at multiple parks. At Crescent Bend Nature Park, we focused on removing dead trees, while significant irrigation system repairs were completed across several locations. We also striped pickleball court lines on three multipurpose courts and added new benches, picnic tables, and trash cans to improve amenities. PROST MASTER PLAN This spring, we started the process of updating the Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails (PROST) Master Plan. The PROST Master Plan is a 10-year plan that establishes a community vision, helps guide decisions, and create an action plan for our parks. We hosted stakeholder meetings and obtained additional feedback about our parks through an online mapping tool, survey, and public input events. The plan will be fully adopted in November of 2024. SUMMER LIKE NEVER BEFORE This summer was like never before! We hosted an incredible 20 summer camps, with 12 facilitated by our own staff and 8 by partner organizations. For the first time ever, we hired 2 Recreation Instructors who played a key role in conducting these camps, along with other programs and events. In comparison, Summer 2023 saw just 3 camps, with only 1 run by our staff. Our special events also saw a huge boost in attendance—Parks and Rec Month attracted nearly 1,200 participants, even with one event rained out, compared to last year’s 300. Movies and Music in the Park more than doubled its attendance, soaring from 405 to 920! RECREATION THE RISE OF PICKLEBALL This year marked the rise of pickleball in our community! We kicked off with our first-ever Pickleball Tournament, the Blizzard Paddle Battle, in December, featuring 11 teams. We also launched our first Pickleball League in the spring with 47 players and held our inaugural in-house Pickleball Camp in July with 17 participants. Our partner, Skyhawks, also hosted a pickleball program with 11 participants, and our Parks and Rec Month Pickleball Open Play saw 43 enthusiastic players. DID SOMEONE SAY MURDER? On April 26, 2024, we hosted our first-ever "Murder Mystery Party" titled "The Greatest Murder on Earth," a circus-themed interactive event for adults. Unlike a show, participants took on assigned roles in a mystery that unfolded throughout the evening. Guests received their character details a week in advance, allowing them to fully immerse by dressing the part. This event was developed in response to community feedback, highlighting a demand for more adult-focused programming and increased activities in Northern Schertz.The event was a resounding success, selling out with a waitlist. Expanding Opportunities Through New Partnerships This year, we've welcomed several new partner organizations to offer even more diverse programs for Schertz residents. Monster's Vale brings live-action role-playing fun with weekly park days and fighter practice. KidCreate Studio sparks creativity with art programs for kids, while Evember offers Floral Design Classes for adults. Cake Poppin with Lex teaches cookie decorating, and Girls with Grit empowers participants by teaching skilled trades through hands-on projects. These partnerships are expanding our offerings and bringing exciting new opportunities to the community! CIVIC & COMMUNITY CENTERS TEAMWORK MAKES THE DREAM WORK In FY23-24, the Civic Center really stepped up to support our community events like never before, jumping into their new role in the Parks, Recreation, and Community Services department. From decking the halls for Breakfast with Santa to checking in vendors at the Kris Kringle Market, we were all hands on deck. We even transformed the space for the Daddy Daughter Dance in under two hours with everyone’s help. The biggest highlight? Assisting with Jubilee, our largest event of the year. The teamwork and energy from the Civic Center team were incredible, showcasing the true spirit of our department! VIRTUAL TOURS The Civic Center, Community Center, and North Center all officially have virtual tours available to view on the Schertz website, complete with an outside view of the facility and close- ups of all the rooms inside. This addition allows customers to easily see if the facility meets their needs without having to schedule an in person tour. PROCESS IMPROVEMENTS Staff has taken time this year to reevaluate our processes to ensure we are operating efficiently and have adequate resources to train staff. This included revamping our Safety Data Sheets and creating an Event Attendant S.O.P Manual focusing on operating equipment and handling inventory, NEW FACES AND FOND FAREWELLS In spring 2024, we welcomed Dawn Williams as our new Event Coordinator, bringing fresh energy and excitement to our team. As we embraced this new chapter, we also celebrated the career of Traci Paprocki, our Administrative Assistant, who retired at the end of the summer after 20 years of service. SOCIAL ENGAGEMENT FB Biggest Reach: Paws in the Pool Photos Reach: 6,339 Interactions: 54 Instagram Biggest Reach: “We’re Back” Reel Reach: 1,316 Interactions: 56 Best Preforming Paid Ad: Archery Camp Reach: 13,993 Interactions: 48 New Followers: Facebook: 1,301 Instagram: 203 Total Followers: Facebook: 8,373 Instagram: 1,477 Total Posts Facebook: 387 Instagram: 349 Page Visits: Facebook: 36,670 Instagram: 1,718 Total Post Reach: 586,933 Facebook: Instagram: 538,839 48,094 Total Likes: 9,523 Facebook: Instagram: 6,332 3,191 Total Comments: 1,062 Facebook: Instagram: 1,010 52 Total Shares 1,386 Facebook: Instagram: 1,025 361 Demographics Female Male 25-34 years old: 25-44 years old: 45-54 years old: 83% 17% 20% 40% 24% Schertz San Antonio Cibolo Converse 25.4% 19.5% 12.6% 3.8% Residency of Followers THANK YOU TO OUR 2023-24 SPONSORS & PARTNERS CATERPILLAR CAKE POPPIN WITH LEX EVEMBER GIRLS WITH GRIT GUADALUPE MASTER NATURALISTS GVEC HEB ICODE KIDCREATE STUDIO METHODIST HOSPITAL NORTHEAST MONSTER’S VALE RIVER CITY COMMUNITY CHURCH SAMCO CAPITAL MARKETS SA ASTRONOMICAL ASSOCIATION SA ZOO SCHERTZ BANK AND TRUST SCHERTZ-CIBOLO EMERGENCY CLINIC SCUCISD SKYHAWKS STATE FARM- NATHAN OBREGON THE CROSSVINE THE CHAMBER THE PURPOSE CHURCH UT HEALTH SAN ANTONIO YMCA Agenda No. 1.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Minutes - Approval of the minutes from the Council Meeting on January 21, 2025, and the minutes from the Special Meeting-Canvassing the Runoff Election on January 28, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney) Attachments Draft minutes 01-28-2025 Canvassing the Runoff Election  CC Minutes - 1/21/2025 DRAFT  MINUTES SPECIAL SESSION COUNCIL MEETING January 28, 2025 A Special Session Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on January 28, 2025, at 5:30 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to-wit: Present: Mayor Ralph Gutierrez; Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook; Councilmember Mark Davis; Councilmember Paul Macaluso; Councilmember Allison Heyward; Councilmember Tim Brown Absent: Councilmember Michelle Watson; Councilmember Place 4-Vacant Staff present: City Manager Steve Williams; Deputy City Manager Brian James; Assistant City Manager Sarah Gonzalez; City Secretary Sheila Edmondson; Deputy City Secretary Sheree Courney          Call to Order Mayor Gutierrez called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m.   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Mayor Gutierrez) Mayor Gutierrez provided the opening prayer and led the Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas.   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. 1 Richard A. Kunz, 2960 Red Tip, Schertz, TX 78108, congratulated Councilmember Ben Guerrero and thanked those who ran for office, giving the City of Schertz a choice. Mr. Kunz also thanked the Guadalupe County Elections Office for their efforts in making the elections happen. He also thanked the voters who voted this election season.   Discussion and Action Items   1.Resolution 25-R-010-Approving a Resolution to canvass the returns and declare the results of the January 18, 2025, Runoff Election, and other matters in connection therewith. (Mayor/Council/S.Edmondson) City Secretary Sheila Edmondson brought forward Resolution 25-R-010 Canvassing the January 18, 2025 Runoff Election. The Runoff Election was held in the City of Schertz, on the January 18, 2025 to elect a Councilmember Place 4 and serve the rest of the three-year term ending November 2026. During the Early Voting there were 518 votes cast, 213 absentee votes and on Election Day 179 votes.The total number of votes cast in this election was 910. Mr. Tim Dusk received a total of 447 votes for a 49.12 percentage Mr. Ben Guerrero received a total of 463 votes for 50.88 percentage With the following vote count, the City Council finds that the results of the special election reflect that Mr. Ben Guerrero is hereby declared elected to the Office of the Councilmember Place 4.       Moved by Councilmember Mark Davis, seconded by Councilmember Allison Heyward  AYE: Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Mark Davis, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Allison Heyward, Councilmember Tim Brown Passed   2.Oath of Office (S.Edmondson) Officer-Oath of Office City Secretary Sheila Edmondson administered the Oath of Office to newly-elected Councilmember Place 4 Ben Guerrero. Comments Councilmember Ben Guerrero thanked Team Guerrero who supported him throughout the 2024 Election Season. He also thanked several family members who came from out of town to support him.   2 Adjournment Mayor Gutierrez adjourned the meeting at 5:44 p.m.   _______________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary 3 D R A F T MINUTES REGULAR MEETING January 21, 2025 A Regular Meeting was held by the Schertz City Council of the City of Schertz, Texas, on January 21, 2025, at 6:00 p.m. in the Hal Baldwin Municipal Complex Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Building #4, Schertz, Texas. The following members present to-wit: Present: Mayor Ralph Gutierrez; Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook; Councilmember Mark Davis; Councilmember Michelle Watson; Councilmember Paul Macaluso; Councilmember Allison Heyward; Councilmember Tim Brown Absent: Councilmember Place 4 (Vacant) Staff present: City Manager Steve Williams; City Attorney Daniel Santee; Deputy City Manager Brian James; City Secretary Sheila Edmondson; Deputy City Secretary Sheree Courney          Call to Order Mayor Gutierrez called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.   Opening Prayer and Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas. (Councilmember Tim Brown) Councilmember Tim Brown provided the opening prayer and led the Pledges of Allegiance to the Flags of the United States and State of Texas.   Proclamations   School Board Recognition Month (Councilmember Westbrook) Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook presented the School Board Recognition Month Proclamation to Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District (SCUCISD) Superintendent Paige Meloni, and Board of Trustee members: President Mr. Ed Finley, Secretary Belinda Evans, Assistant Secretary Amy Thomas, and Trustees Mr. Jerry Perkins, Ms. Margaret Carlin, and Mr. Dan Swart and Judson Independent School District Board President Ms. Suzanne Kenoyer.      Presentations   Presentation of the FY 23-24 Parks & Recreation Annual Report (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) Presentation of the FY 23-24 Parks & Recreation Annual Report was postponed.    1   Discussion and consideration of forthcoming financing of Schertz/Seguin Local Corporation Bond Issuance (S.Gonzalez/J.Walters) Deputy City Manager Brian James introduced Mr. Andrew Friedman, Senior Managing Director with Public Finance with SAMCO Capital Markets. Mr. Friedman explained that since Schertz and Seguin are each 50% owners of the corporation, SSLGC must seek approval from both to borrow money to make capital improvements through bond sales. Tonight's presentation was to provide information on the proposed action to borrow an amount not to exceed $15 million dollars for improvements to the system. They will return to Council with a request for formal approval on February 18, 2025.      City Events and Announcements Announcements of upcoming City Events (B. James/S. Gonzalez) Deputy City Manager Brian James announced upcoming city events. Announcements and recognitions by the City Manager (S. Williams) City Manager Steve Williams thanked the City Staff for their hard work in planning for the bad weather day. He extended kudos to the Fire personnel, John Perry, Carl Schultze, Patricio Wilson, Tyler Wencka, and Amanda Mathews who were deployed for two weeks to Los Angeles to assist with the wildfires. Mr. Williams thanked the Chamber for allowing Schertz to host the 2025 Chamber Leadership Core Class, where staff and participants were able to talk about municipal government and engage in a mock city council meeting. Announcements and recognitions by the Mayor (R. Gutierrez) Mayor Gutierrez conveyed special gratitude to the crew who are assisting with the California fires. Mayor Gutierrez thanked everyone who participated in recent elections and congratulated successful candidates, including President Trump, Senator Cruz, Congressman Cuellar, Congressman Casar, Texas State Senator Donna Campbell, and Texas State Representative Alan Schoolcraft.   Hearing of Residents This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the City Council. Each person should fill out the speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than 3 minutes.  All remarks shall be addressed to the Council as a body, and not to any individual member thereof. Any person making personal, impertinent, or slanderous remarks while addressing the Council may be requested to leave the meeting. 2 All handouts and/or USB devices must be submitted to the City Secretary no later than noon on the Monday preceding the meeting.  Handouts will be provided to each Councilmember prior to the start of the meeting by the City Secretary.  All USB devices will be vetted by City IT staff to ensure City property is protected from malware. Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook recognized the following residents: Ben Guerrero , 506 Capot Court Ln, thanked residents who came out to vote in the Special Election and the Runoff Election. He also thanked Guadalupe County Conservative Republicans, the Schertz Police Association, and Mr. Roy Richard for their endorsements. Josh Pollock, 128 Summit, addressed council regarding item 7 of the agenda. He stated they were present to answer any questions regarding the upcoming executive session. Maggie Titterington, 1730 Schertz Parkway, provided an update on upcoming Chamber events.   Consent Agenda Items The Consent Agenda is considered self-explanatory and will be enacted by the Council with one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless they are removed from the Consent Agenda upon the request of the Mayor or a Councilmember.   1.Minutes - Approval of the minutes from the Council Workshop Meeting and regular Council Meeting on January 7, 2025 (S.Edmondson/S.Courney)      2.Appointments, Re-appointments, and Resignations - City of Schertz Boards, Commissions and Committees Resignations EDC-Henry Hayes   3.Resolution 25-R-007- Authorizing the Schertz Police Department to apply for a Bullet-Resistant Shield Grant (J.Lowery)      4.Resolution 25-R-001- Authorizing the Schertz Police Department to apply for a Rifle-Resistant Body Armor Grant through the Office of the Governor for the Fiscal Year 2026 (J.Lowery)      5.Resolution 25-R-012 - Authorizing the Schertz Police Department to apply for the FY 2026 Project Safe Neighborhood Grant Program (J.Lowery) No items were removed for separate action. Mayor Gutierrez asked for a motion to approve Consent Agenda Items #1 - 5.    3    Moved by Councilmember Michelle Watson, seconded by Councilmember Allison Heyward  AYE: Mayor Pro-Tem Robert Westbrook, Councilmember Mark Davis, Councilmember Michelle Watson, Councilmember Paul Macaluso, Councilmember Allison Heyward, Councilmember Tim Brown Passed   Discussion and Action Items   6.Ordinance 25-S-004 - Consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs. (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado) Staff requested this item be tabled.      7.Resolution 25-R-005 - Approving a Utility Service Extension Request for the Woman Hollering Townhomes (B.James/K.Woodlee) Mayor Gutierrez postponed discussion on Item #7 for discussion with City Attorney to be conducted in Executive Session. Following the Executive Session, Mayor Gutierrez announced this item was tabled.      Mayor Gutierrez recessed to Closed Session at 6:21 p.m. Closed Session   8.The City Council will meet in closed session in accordance with Texas Government Code Section 551.071 to consult with legal counsel regarding the City’s legal rights and obligations within its certificated utility service areas lying in its extraterritorial jurisdiction.   Reconvene into Regular Session Mayor Gutierrez reconvened Regular Session at 7:14 p.m.   9.Take any action based on discussion held in Closed Session under Agenda Item #8. Mayor Gutierrez stated the discussion for Closed Session Agenda Item #8 started at 6:27 p.m. and ended at 7:11 p.m. No action was taken.   4   Workshop   10.Workshop Discussion on the Integration of Space Force into Veterans Memorial Plaza (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) This time was postponed until next scheduled meeting.      11.January 2025 Quarterly Streets Update Mayor Gutierrez recognized Streets Superintendent Robert Martinez who briefed Council on the status of streets in light of the winter storm. He then provided a presentation utilizing the Streets Maintenance Dashboard showing completed and pending projects, including potholes, street issues, sidewalk issues, and other issues such as defaced or faded signs. Public Works Director Larry Busch added clarification on the work being done and included an update on the asset management software implementation. Assistant City Engineer John Nowak provided an update on the 2024 SPAM projects (Resurfacing Project, Rehabilitation Project, and Project Modifications) and concluded with a brief presentation of the 2025 SPAM Projects and other Street Projects. No Council discussion occurred.      Information available in City Council Packets - NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   Requests and Announcements Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff No requests from Mayor or Councilmembers for updates or information from Staff. Requests by Mayor and Councilmembers that items or presentations be placed on a future City Council agenda No requests from Mayor or Councilmembers for items or presentations to be placed on a future City Council agenda. City and Community Events attended and to be attended (Council) Councilmember Allison Heyward attended the following events: 89th Legislative Swearing In Ceremony for Texas Representative Alan Schoolcraft; the TML Legislative Update; the American Public Works Association Webinar on Life-cycle Modeling for Local Government; the TML Region 8 Meeting as TML President; and she served as emcee for the TML Traps for the Unwary Seminar.   Adjournment 5 Adjournment Mayor Gutierrez adjourned the meeting at 7:41 p.m.   _______________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: ____________________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary 6 Agenda No. 2.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Library Subject:Resolution 25-R-016 - Authorizing a Public Library Interlocal Agreement for mutual access to CloudLibrary digital resources (S.Gonzalez/M.Uhlhorn) BACKGROUND Note: An ILA is currently in effect per Council action in 2019; however, Bibliotheca, the company that owned cloudLibrary and the cloudLink platform, sold this portion of their business to OCLC in 2024. This updated ILA reflects the new ownership. The following is updated background information from the original 2019 resolution. The Schertz Public Library began offering e-books and e-audiobooks to our community more than 15 years ago. Digital resources are no longer a novelty, but an essential and in-demand service libraries provide to their customers. It is a service, however, that comes with some challenges. On the upside, digital content:   Offers flexibility to our customers. eBooks and eAudiobooks are one more way to fit reading into busy lives.  Provides access to reading materials to people who aren’t able to physically come into the library. From deployed military personnel, to children at home with an illness, to shut-in elderly persons, reading can still be part of life even when access to physical materials is limited.  Makes it easy to update content or provide access to digital-only or out-of-print content. This is particularly important when providing non-fiction and educational materials.  Allows libraries with limited space for physical collections to maintain minimum materials per capita levels when they run out of room.  On the downside, digital content:   Costs far more for a library to provide than regular print materials. The average cost of an eBook to libraries is around $50 vs. $29 for print. Digital audiobooks average around $70. Is difficult for customers to discover without a platform for viewing it and the ability to integrate the titles into regular library catalogs.  Is proving to be almost impossible to build robust collections over time because publishers are metering the content. Metering is the practice of requiring a library to purchase a copy of a book over and over again because the license only lasts for 26 or 52 check-outs. Other metering models are based on unlimited check-outs for a limited period of time, such as 12 or 24 months. Some publishers allow libraries to purchase titles with a perpetual license, meaning that the library owns the title forever. A perpetual license title can cost more than $100, but fewer and fewer titles have perpetual licenses.  In 2017, eleven public libraries in the Dallas area, discouraged by the unfavorable terms of their digital consortium, the high cost of providing digital content, and their inability to build up the number of titles in their digital collections even after significant investment, began looking for a way to share their digital content with each other. Their idea was to create a system based on the way libraries share their physical collections through interlibrary loan. Each library in the group would own its own content (unlike most consortia which own titles collectively) and let other libraries borrow a title when its own customers weren’t using it. They formed a coordinating committee, partnered with Bibliotheca (formerly known as 3M), one of the largest digital content providers to public libraries, to create a platform that allowed title sharing, and created an interlocal agreement. Once the libraries began sharing their content through this digital interlibrary loan system, they all saw dramatic increases in usage and decreases in wait time for their customers. Library customers immediately had access to more than 10 times the number of titles they had previously. Several months later, Bexar County’s Bibliotech library joined the group and the number of titles available to customers skyrocketed. Since its beginnings in 2017, the group has grown to almost 70 libraries across Texas. The number of shareable copies available to customers is currently more than 300,000.    The initial length of the agreement was 10 years and is still set to expire in 2027. Once a library joins the group, the interlocal agreement is in place until a library dissolves the relationship with written notice, violates the terms and is voted out of the group by the coordinating committee, or the CloudLibrary Cloudlinking program is no longer available.   GOAL Our goal in being a member of this consortium is to greatly expand the number of eBook and and eAudiobook titles available to our customers at minimal cost. This is keeping with our policy values of enhancing quality of life for our residents and being fiscally sustainable. The minimum threshold spend of $10,000 required to be a part of the consortium purchases about 140 eBook titles and about 50 eAudiobook titles. If we were to purchase these titles and made them available on our own non-shared platform, customers would never have more than a few thousand titles to choose from due to metering as explained in the Background section. By being part of the consortium, our customers have access to the titles we purchase as well as an additional 300,000+ titles. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Being a part of the consortium through this interlocal agreement greatly expands the amount of digital content available to our library customers, as well as greatly leveraging the amount of money we spend on digital content. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Recommend approval of Resolution 25-R-016 to update the Coudlink interlocal agreement.  FISCAL IMPACT The interlocal agreement does require each participating library to spend a minimum amount per year on content, as well as a $1,000 annual Cloudlink fee. The requirement is to spend a minimum of $10,000 or 10% of a library’s materials budget, whichever is less, in order to have a robust collection for users. For the Schertz Public Library, this means we must meet an expenditure level of $10,000 per year, a number that we already surpass. We have increased our spending with Cloud in the years since joining the consortium as it gives us more content for our money. In FY24, we spent approximately $26,000 on Cloud digital content and $10,000 on digital content in our other digital platform, Overdrive. The Texas State Library and Archives Commission also provides the digital platform, Boundless, to accredited public libraries through a program called eRead Texas. Boundless is powered by a Baker & Taylor product called Axis 360. Use of this platform is free to us, but we do not control any of the content, meaning we can't add anything our customers may want to read. Having access to all three major platforms is desirable as not all published titles are available through every vendor. We purchase print titles from multiple vendors for the same reason. We consider Cloud to be our primary platform, but Overdrive is necessary as it is currently the only vendor licensed to provide Kindle format titles to public library users. Money for digital content is already a part of our materials budget--this interlocal agreement update does not require us to spend anything additional to what we are already spending. RECOMMENDATION This Interlocal agreement is advantageous to our customers in that they will have access to many more unique titles than we can afford to provide on our own. They will also have access to more copies of titles, driving down wait times. Staff recommends adoption of this Resolution authorizing the Public Library Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources Attachments Resolution 25-R-016 with attachments  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-016 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING A PUBLIC LIBRARY INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL ACCESS TO CLOUDLIBRARY DIGITAL RESOURCES, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City Council (the “City Council”) of the City of Schertz (the “City”) has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to enter into a Public Library Interlocal Agreement with other local governments which have executed an Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Access to cloudLibrary Digital Resources (the “Parties”), permitting the citizens of the City to utilize the cloudLibrary digital resources of the Parties and vice versa; now, therefore,” BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Public Library Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Access to cloudLibrary Digital Resources in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this _____ day of ______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) SCHERTZ CloudLibrary ILA Library SCHERTZ CloudLibrary ILA Library A-1 EXHIBIT A CloudLibrary/CloudLink Interlocal Agreement Page 1 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources THIRD AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT FOR MUTUAL ACCESS TO CLOUDLIBRARY DIGITAL RESOURCES This Third Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources (the “Agreement”) is made and entered into by and among the local governments which have executed it (“Parties”). The Parties, acting by and through their authorized officers execute this Agreement pursuant to Texas Government Code, Chapter 791, known as the Interlocal Cooperation Act (the “Act”). WHEREAS, the Parties are local governments engaged in promotion of public health and welfare by providing easy access to the broad range of public library services to their citizens, including cloudLibrary digital resources operated by OCLC, Inc.; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to further expand public access to digital content by sharing their respective Cloud Resources, as hereinafter defined, among their respective libraries; and WHEREAS, the cloudLibrary cloudLink service allows libraries using the service to share their Cloud Resources with each other; and WHEREAS, the Act provides authorization for local governments to contract with one another to provide governmental functions and services; and WHEREAS, provision of public library services are governmental functions and services under the terms of the Act; and WHEREAS, the governing body of each local government believes that the Agreement is necessary for the benefit of the public and that each party has the legal authority to provide governmental functions and services that are the subject of the Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Parties originally entered into the original Interlocal Agreement for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources in 2017 (the “Original Agreement”), which was then amended by the Parties in 2017 and 2018 (the “First and Second Amendments”); and WHEREAS, the Parties now wish to update the Original Agreement, as amended by the First and Second Amendments, by incorporating the First and Second Amendments as well as the additional amendments included herein, to create this Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Parties agree that this Agreement shall supersede and replace any existing agreement among the Parties regarding the subject matter set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, upon and for the mutual consideration stated herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Parties hereto agree as follows: Page 2 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources ARTICLE I Definitions Unless the context clearly indicates otherwise, the following words and phrases used in this Agreement shall have the following meaning: “Cloud Resources” shall mean all library content provided by the Parties for upload into the OCLC Inc. cloudLibrary for the mutual benefit, access and/or use of the Parties and their Libraries. “Coordinating Committee” shall mean the representatives selected to represent each Party from the participating Parties in this Agreement. “Library or Libraries” shall mean the library/ies and resources thereof of the Parties. “Local Government” shall have the meaning given in Section 791.003 of the Act, as amended. ARTICLE II Term 2.1 The initial term of this Agreement shall be for a period of ten (10) years beginning on May 31, 2017, unless sooner terminated as provided herein (“Initial Term”). The Initial Term may be extended by written agreement of the Parties for one or more five (5) year renewal terms (each a “Renewal Term”); provided that any such renewal occurs not less than 30 days prior to the end of the then current term. ARTICLE III Responsibilities of the Parties 3.1 Access. Each Library shall allow cardholders of the other Libraries to access and check out its Cloud Resources through the cloudLink service under the terms and conditions of the cardholder’s Library, unless otherwise specified in the Agreement. 3.2 Policies and Procedures. The current policies and procedures of each Library shall remain in effect, with no coordination or standardization required, except that the following procedures shall be followed for shared Cloud Resources: a.Cloud Resources may only be placed on hold by cardholders of the Library which owns the Cloud Resource in question. b.Available Cloud Resources may be checked out by any cardholder of a participating Library. Page 3 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources c. The circulation period of the Cloud Resources are determined by the circulation policies of the cardholder’s Library and may vary among Libraries. d. Each Library shall track the number of items checked out from their respective Libraries and create an annual report by fiscal year of such data for review by the Coordinating Committee. These reports shall be provided to the Coordinating Committee annually by not later than January 1st. e. Each Library shall submit an annual report of expenditures on Cloud Resources in the preceding fiscal year as set by that Party to the Coordinating Committee annually by not later than January 1st. f. Each Library shall submit an annual report of their overall materials budget if their expenditure on Cloud Resources is less than $10,000 per fiscal year. This report shall be provided to the Coordinating Committee annually by not later than January 1st. 3.3 Liaison Designated. By this Agreement, each Party designates its director of library services or equivalent, as listed on each Party’s signature page hereto attached, to act on behalf of the Party to ensure the performance of all duties and obligations of the designee’s Party as herein stated, to serve as a liaison for the Party with and among the Parties, and, if necessary, to serve on the Coordinating Committee. 3.4 Participation Requirements. Each Library shall spend a minimum of $10,000 or 10% of its overall materials budget, whichever is less, on Cloud Resources during each fiscal year as set by that Party. Compliance with this section will not be required for any fiscal year during which a Party did not participate in this Agreement for the entire fiscal year. Compliance with this and other requirements will be determined by the Coordinating Committee on an annual basis, based on reports required by Article III. 3.5 Addition of Members. Any local government in the state of Texas which has contracted for the use of the cloudLibrary cloudLink service and agrees to abide by the terms of this Agreement may join this Agreement as a Party upon approval by a majority of all of the members of the Coordinating Committee. If approval is given, the new participating entity shall join the Parties by adopting and executing this Agreement through an action of the Party’s governing body. 3.6 Cost. Each Party will bear its own cost of performance under this Agreement. ARTICLE IV The Coordinating Committee 4.1 Coordinating Committee. Page 4 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources a. The Coordinating Committee membership shall be the designated liaisons from the following local governments: i. City of Lewisville ii.City of Burleson iii. City of Carrollton iv. City of Colleyville v. City of Coppell vi. City of Euless vii.Town of Flower Mound viii.City of McKinney ix. City of Sachse x. City of Southlake xi.Town of Little Elm xii.Bexar County b.The Coordinating Committee shall have only the duties specifically outlined in this Agreement. The Coordinating Committee shall have the authority to adopt its own rules of procedure that are consistent with Article III, Section 3.2 and in compliance with terms of this Agreement. c.A simple majority of all members of the Coordinating Committee shall constitute a quorum to perform. A quorum of the Coordinating Committee must participate in any decision made by the Coordinating Committee under this Agreement. d.The Coordinating Committee shall meet at least once every six (6) months. Meetings shall be held in person, by conference call, or by another live remote meeting access service. e.A simple majority vote of all members of the Coordinating Committee shall select a member to receive any reports and send any notices required under this Agreement. This individual’s name and contact information shall be provided to all Parties within thirty (30) days of the individual’s selection. f.A simple majority vote of the Coordinating Committee members present shall select a member to draft minutes outlining the items discussed and decisions made by the Coordinating Committee at any given meeting. The minutes shall be sent to the Coordinating Committee for approval within thirty (30) days of the meeting, and must be approved by a majority of all members of the Coordinating Committee within thirty (30) days of its distribution. The minutes may be distributed and approval of the minutes provided to the drafter via e-mail. These minutes shall be distributed to all Parties within ten (10) days of their approval. Page 5 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources g. The Parties understand and agree that the Coordinating Committee shall not be construed as a board or committee appointed by a governing body and shall not be required to comply with the provisions of the Texas Open Meetings Act, Chapter 551 of the Texas Government Code. ARTICLE V Termination 5.1 This Agreement may be terminated as follows: a.Any Party may choose to terminate its participation in the Agreement with sixty (60) days’ written notice to each of the members of the Coordinating Committee at the notice address provided in this Agreement. The termination of a Party’s participation in this Agreement shall not affect the continuation of this Agreement in full force and effect with respect to the remaining Parties. b.A Party’s participation in the Agreement may be terminated for any reason, including failure to comply with the terms of this Agreement, by an affirmative vote of two-thirds (2/3) of all of the members of the Coordinating Committee to remove the Party. Upon termination under this section, the Coordinating Committee shall provide thirty (30) days’ written notice to the Party which has been removed following the Committee’s decision. The Coordinating Committee will contact OCLC, Inc. and notify them of the Party’s removal. c.In the event that the cloudLibrary cloudLink program is no longer available, this Agreement shall automatically terminate. 5.2 Upon termination, each Party will retain its rights, title and interest to all Cloud Resources purchased by the Party during its time as a Party to this Agreement. ARTICLE VI Liability and Immunity 6.1 Liability and Immunity. a.Handling of Claims. The Parties agree, to the extent authorized under the constitution and laws of the State of Texas and without waiving any immunity, right, protection, or defense therein, that each shall be individually responsible for any and all claims for damages, cost, and expenses to person or persons and property that may arise out of or be occasioned by the intentional or negligent act or omission of its respective Page 6 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources officials, agents, representatives, and employees in the performance of this Agreement, including but not limited to their acts of negligence or omission in the provision of public library services, including the cloud based services that are the subject to this Agreement. The Parties agree that each shall be liable only for damages, including attorneys’ fees and costs, related to or arising out of the intentional or negligent act or omission of their respective officials, agents, representatives, and employees in the performance of this Agreement. b. Joint Liability. In the event of joint or concurrent negligence of the Parties, responsibility, if any, shall be apportioned comparatively in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas without, however, waiving any governmental immunity, right, protection, or defense available to any party individually under Texas law. The provisions of this section are solely for the benefit of the Parties hereto and are not intended to create or grant any rights, contractual or otherwise, to any other person or entity. c. No Waiver of Immunity. It is expressly understood and agreed that in execution of this Agreement, no Party waives, nor shall be deemed to have waived, immunity or defense that would otherwise be available to it against claims arising in the exercise of governmental powers and functions. By entering into this Agreement, the Parties do not create any obligations, express or implied, other than those set forth herein, and this Agreement shall not create any rights in parties not signatories hereto. ARTICLE VII Miscellaneous 7.1 Assignment. This Agreement may not be assigned by any Party hereto without the prior written unanimous consent of the other parties. No assignment, delegation of duties or subcontract under this Agreement shall be effective without the prior written unanimous consent of all Parties hereto. 7.2 Governing Law. The validity of this Agreement and any of its terms and provisions, as well as the rights and duties of the parties, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Texas; and venue for any action arising as a result of this Agreement shall be in the state court of Denton County, Texas, except when state law requires otherwise. 7.3 Legal Construction. In the event that any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason be held to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, such invalidity, illegality, or unenforceability shall not affect the other provisions, and the Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provisions had never been contained in this Agreement. Page 7 ILA for Mutual Access to CloudLibrary Digital Resources 7.4 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by a simple majority vote of all members of the Coordinating Committee. 7.5 Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement among the Parties with respect to the subject matter covered by this Agreement. 7.6 No Relationship Created. The Parties agree and acknowledge that no Party is an agent of any other Party under this Agreement and that each Party is responsible for its own acts, forbearance, negligence, and deeds, and for those of its agents or employees. The purposes for which each Party has entered into this Agreement are separate and distinct. It is not the intent of any of the Parties that a joint enterprise relationship is being entered into and the Parties hereto specifically disclaim such relationship. 7.7 Rights of Third Parties. Nothing contained in this Agreement shall be construed to create, and the Parties do not intend to create, any rights in or for the benefit of third parties. 7.8 Force Majeure. In the event that any party shall be prevented from performing any of its obligations under this Agreement by any act of God, war, right, civil commotion, strikes, fires, flood or by the occurrence of any other event beyond the control of such party, then such party shall be excused from the performance of the obligations in this Agreement but only during such periods of Force Majeure. 7.9 Current Revenues. All costs or expenses incurred by any Party as result of this Agreement shall be paid from the current revenues available to the Party. 7.10 Recitals. The recitals of this Agreement are incorporated herein. 7.11 Severability. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held by a court of competent jurisdiction to be contrary to law or contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of the law, the remaining portions of the Agreement shall be enforced as if the invalid provision had never been included. 7.12 Notice. All notices pertaining to this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be deemed delivered (i) when received at a Party's address if hand delivered or sent via overnight delivery service by way of USPS, UPS, FedEx, or similar carrier, or (ii) on the third (3rd) business day after being deposited in the United States mail, postage prepaid, certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the Parties at the respective notice addresses set forth below or at other addresses as may have been previously specified by written notice delivered in accordance with this Agreement. [SIGNATURE PAGES ATTACHED] APPROVED BY THE GOVERNING BODY OF PARTICIPATING ENTITY, CITY OF SCHERTZ, GUADALUPE COUNTY, TEXAS, this ___ day of ________________________, 2025. EXECUTED BY: ____________________________________________ STEVE WILLIAMS, CITY MANAGER ATTEST: _____________________________________________ SHEILA EDMONDSON, CITY SECRETARY Liaison: Melissa Uhlhorn Library Director Notice to: Schertz Public Library 798 Schertz Pkwy Schertz, TX 78154 Attn: Melissa Uhlhorn 210.619.1701 APPROVED AS TO FORM: ____________________________________________ CITY ATTORNEY Agenda No. 3.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject: Resolution 25-R-018 – Authorizing the City Manager to sign and submit a Notice of Intent for Stormwater Discharges from Small Municipal Separate Storm Sewer Systems (MS4) under the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) Phase II MS4 General Permit TXR040000 for the City and other matters in connection therewith (B.James/K.Woodlee) BACKGROUND The Federal Water Pollution Control Act was passed in 1972.  After the law was amended in 1977, it became commonly known as the Clean Water Act.  The Clean Water Act (The Act) established the structure for federal regulation of pollutant discharges into the waters of the United States, authorized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement pollution control program, extended the requirements to establish standards or surface water contaminants, and made it unlawful to discharge unpermitted point source pollutants into navigable water.  The Act also established funding for construction of sewage treatment plants and promoted planning to address non-point source pollution.  In order to reduce stormwater pollution, amendments were made to the Clean Water Act in 1987, requiring stormwater discharges to be permitted in two phases. Phase 1 applied, among other things, to large cities with separate stormwater sewer systems.  The regulations required these cities to obtain National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits.  The permit process imposed controls on the cities to reduce pollution in stormwater discharges. Phase 2 applies to smaller cities.  In 1990, the EPA issued final regulations for Phase 2.  The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) issued the Texas Pollutants Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Permit Number TXR040000 (General Permit) for Phase 2 Stormwater on August 13, 2007 in order to create a mechanism for non-Phase 1 Texas cities with populations of over 1,000 to come into compliance with the federal regulations. On August 13, 2024, TCEQ issued the latest revision to General Permit TXR040000.  With the new General Permit all Small MS4s are defined by levels based on the population served in and Urban Area (UA) according to the 2020 decennial census.  The population of the City of Schertz was 42,002, defining the community as a Level 3 Small MS4. The process of applying for coverage under and maintaining conformance to the General Permit begins with submitting a Notice of Intent (NOI) to the TCEQ.  The NOI confirms the request to be covered by and intent to comply with TPDES General Permit TXR040000.  Resolution 25-R-018 authorizes the City Manager to sign and submit the NOI to TCEQ in accordance with statutory signature requirements of 30 TAC Section 305.44. GOAL The goal of this resolution is to authorize the City Manager to sign and submit a Notice of Intent to The goal of this resolution is to authorize the City Manager to sign and submit a Notice of Intent to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to comply with General Permit TXR040000. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Part of the requirements to comply with the General Permit is the implementation of a Stormwater Management Program (SWMP) proposed to reduce pollution by increasing the city’s control of stormwater pollution sources.  Implementation of the SWMP proposes the means to develop, implement, and enforce a plan to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the maximum extent practicable (MEP).  This furthers the City's efforts to achieve a healthy, safe community for citizens. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that Council approve Resolution 25-R-018 authorizing the City Manager to sign the NOI for the MS4 General Permit. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 25-R-018. Attachments Resolution 25-R-018  2024 MS4 General Permit  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-018 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN AND SUBMIT A NOTICE OF INTENT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES FROM SMALL MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEMS (MS4) UNDER THE TEXAS POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (TPDES) PHASE II MS4 GENERAL PERMIT TXR040000 FOR THE CITY AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, The Federal Water Pollution Control Act was passed in 1972. After the law was amended in 1977, it became commonly known as the Clean Water Act¹. The Clean Water Act (The Act) established the structure for federal regulation of pollutant discharges into the waters of the United States, authorized the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to implement pollution control program, extended the requirements to establish standards or surface water contaminants, and made it unlawful to discharge unpermitted point source pollutants into navigable water. In order to reduce stormwater pollution, amendments were made to the Clean Water Act in 1987, requiring stormwater discharges to be permitted in two phases; and WHEREAS, Phase 1 applied, among other things, to large cities with separate stormwater sewer systems. The regulations required these cities to obtain National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits. The permit process imposed controls on the cities to reduce pollution in stormwater discharges; and WHEREAS, In 1990, the EPA issued final regulations for Phase 2. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) issued the Texas Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (TPDES) General Permit Number TXR040000 (General Permit) for Phase 2 stormwater on August 13, 2007 in order to create a mechanism for non-Phase 1 Texas cities with populations of over 1,000 to come into compliance with the federal regulations; and WHEREAS, On August 15, 2024, TCEQ issued the latest revision to General Permit TXR040000. With the new General Permit all Small MS4s are defined by levels based on the population served in and Urban Area (UA) according to the 2020 decennial census. Schertz’ population was 42,002 defining the community as a Level 3 Small MS4; and BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute a Notice of Intent (NOI) to be covered under and comply with TPDES General Permit TXR040000 to the TCEQ. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. - 2 - Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this ____ day of _______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Guttierez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmonson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) Agenda No. 4.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Library Subject: Resolution 25-R-019 Authorizing the submission of a Special Projects Grant application to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) for a Library Outreach Vehicle (S.Gonzalez/M.Uhlhorn) BACKGROUND In late November 2024, the Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) opened a Special Projects grant opportunity for library projects intended to expand library services to all members of a library's community. The grant enables libraries to develop programs for populations with special needs or those having difficulty using the library. Schertz Public Library's grant request is for a library outreach vehicle to provide programs, services, and materials to community members who cannot easily access services at the library. Up to $75,000 is available for the project. GOAL The goal of this resolution is to authorize City staff to apply for a TSLAC Special Projects grant, and for the City to accept the funds if awarded. COMMUNITY BENEFIT The Library is a community hub and a heavily used resource for residents. But because it is centrally located, residents in north and south Schertz are inconvenienced by the distance they must drive to the library. An outreach vehicle would allow us to take the library to them. It would also make it possible to take library services to the senior housing communities, assisted living facilities, schools, daycares, and to the homebound. This would help make library services accessible to a much larger group of residents and could be considered as a mobile “branch” library until such time as the City can build actual branch libraries. An outreach vehicle was an identified need and high priority recommendation in the Matrix staffing study in conjunction with the addition of an Outreach Librarian as a way of improving the reach of the library into the community. These outcomes are in alignment with the City's strategic plan "Sense of Community" goal, in particular the objective of "Grow quality of life programs and facilities." Receiving these grant funds does not obligate adding the Outreach Librarian position - staff will continue to request this position and it will be prioritized with all other requests throughout the budget process. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION City staff recommends approval of Resolution 25-R-019. FISCAL IMPACT This reimbursement grant provides funds up to $75,000 for a library project with no requirement for This reimbursement grant provides funds up to $75,000 for a library project with no requirement for cost sharing, matching funds, or cost participation.  The amount of the grant is expected to cover the cost of the vehicle and customization. However, if the funds are awarded and an outreach vehicle is purchased, there will be recurring fuel, insurance and maintenance costs, roughly estimated at approximately $3,000 annually. The project, from implementation to conclusion, will take place between July 2025 to June 2026, so these ongoing costs will begin in the second half of FY26. As for staffing, current staff will oversee the project and operate the vehicle to begin with, but the goal is to add an Outreach Librarian position (weighted salary approximately $80,000/yr) to develop a robust outreach program for the community and make full use of the opportunities the vehicle provides. Receiving these grant funds does not obligate adding the Outreach Librarian position - staff will continue to request this position and it will be prioritized with all other requests throughout the budget process. RECOMMENDATION City staff recommends approval of Resolution 25-R-019. Attachments Resolution 25-R-019 with attachments  Special Projects Grant Announcement  Application Signature Form  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-019 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT A SPECIAL PROJECTS GRANT APPLICATION, AND ACCEPT GRANT FUNDS IF AWARDED, FROM THE TEXAS STATE LIBRARY AND ARCHIVES COMMISSION (TSLAC) FOR A LIBRARY OUTREACH VEHICLE, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the “City”) has recommended that the City submit an application for a $75,000 reimbursement grant for the purchase of a Library Outreach Vehicle; and WHEREAS, the Schertz City Council finds it in the best interest of the citizens of the City of the Schertz to submit an application for the FY 2026 TSLAC Special Projects Grant. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes City staff to apply for the FY 2026 TSLAC Special Projects Grant as described in Exhibit A for a Library Outreach Vehicle, and accept funds if awarded. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this _________ day of ______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ____________________________________ Mayor, Ralph Gutierrez ATTEST: ___________________________________ City Secretary, Sheila Edmondson (CITY SEAL) Exhibit A TSLAC Special Projects Grant Announcement Notice of Funding Opportunity State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2026 Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines Application Due Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2025 Library Development & Networking Division October 2024 Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 2 of 17 Table of Contents A. Program Description .................................................................................................................. 3 B. Award Information ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Eligibility Information .................................................................................................................. 4 D. Application and Submission Information ................................................................................. 4 E. Application Review Information ............................................................................................... 7 F. Award Administration Information ......................................................................................... 15 G. Contacts ................................................................................................................................... 17 Comments regarding the programs and services of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission can be addressed to: Director and Librarian P. O. Box 12927  Austin, Texas 78711-2927 512-463-5460  512-463-5436 fax Cover image: Courtesy of Bigstock Photo. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 3 of 17 A. Program Description Goals and Purposes This grant program provides funds for programs that expand library services to include all members of the library’s community. It enables libraries to develop programs for populations with special needs or those having difficulty using the library. Programs focusing on community engagement or involving collaboration with other community organizations are strongly encouraged. Programs must emphasize improved services by the library to its customers. These programs must meet the following LSTA goals as identified in the 2023-2027 LSTA 5-Year Plan (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/sites/default/files/public/tslac/ld/pubs/lstaplan/IMLS%20LSTA%20Five- Year%20Plan%202023-2027%20-%20Texas%20-%20FINAL.pdf): Goals • Through Texas libraries, Texans will have access to digital resources and services needed to help them navigate the digital information landscape successfully. • Texans will have access to library materials and services that support literacy and educational attainment, especially early childhood and family literacy, workforce readiness, and lifelong learning. • Texans will receive library services from trained library staff that effectively respond to community needs. The purpose of this grant program is not for collection development or other activities primarily focused on the acquisition of library materials or resources, or digitization projects. Applications for FY 2026 may be submitted in one of two Special Projects programs — Special Projects 25 or Special Projects 75. Applicants may not apply for both programs in the same program year. Special Projects 25 will support eligible projects for a single year with grant funding up to $25,000. Projects will not be eligible for additional TSLAC grant funding beyond the initial grant period. Special Projects 75 will support larger projects implemented over multiple years within the TSLAC guidelines. Single year funding may not exceed $75,000. Successful applicants will be eligible to apply for additional grant funds to support work on the project for up to two consecutive years following the initial year of funding. B. Award Information Approximately $750,000 is expected to be available for Special Projects Grants, subject to approval by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and the availability of funds. Funding is provided by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) as a subaward of IMLS’ Grants to States Program under the Library Services and Technology Act. Assistance Listing Number/Title: 45.310 Grants to States Maximum Award Applications of all sizes are encouraged. While the request may be part of a larger program, awards will not exceed $25,000 for Special Projects 25 or $75,000 for Special Projects 75. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 4 of 17 Length of Funding Funding will be for one year (July 1, 2025–June 30, 2026). Successful applicants under the Special Projects 75 grant are eligible to apply for grant funds to support work on the same project for up to two consecutive years following the initial grant period for a total of three consecutive years of funding. C. Eligibility Information Through their governing authority, accredited public libraries, local public library systems, libraries that are members of the TexShare Library Consortium, or nonprofit organizations that are applying on behalf of accredited libraries and/or TexShare members, are eligible to apply for funds. An applicant that is a nonprofit organization is eligible only if the organization’s organizational charter, operating guidelines, or mission statement includes providing direct support for affiliated library activities and goals as a defined objective. Public library applicants must be accredited by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission for the fiscal year in which the grant contracts are issued. Applicants may only submit one application for consideration under the Special Projects grant program per funding cycle. As noted above, successful applicants under the Special Projects 75 grant are eligible to apply for grant funds under the same program for the two consecutive years following the initial grant year. Funding in the initial or a subsequent grant period does not guarantee funding in future grant periods. The second- and third-year applications will be evaluated on the same criteria as new applications. No applicant will be eligible for a fourth year of funding for the same project. Eligible Expenses This grant program may fund costs for staff, equipment**, capital expenditures, supplies, professional services, indirect costs, and other typical expenses, as permitted by the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS). The purpose of this grant is not for collection development, or other activities primarily focused on the acquisition of library materials or resources outside of the proposed program, or digitization projects, except as noted in the grant guidelines. There is no requirement for cost sharing, matching funds, or cost participation with this grant program. ** Equipment costing $10,000 or more per unit will require approval from IMLS before purchase. Ineligible Expenses Except as provided in grant guidelines, competitive grants may NOT fund the following expenses: a. Capital expenditures related to the purchase of real property or buildings b. Capital expenditures related to the construction or expansion of facilities, including fixtures and services c. Capital expenditures related to renovation costs, including fixtures and services d. Food, beverages, or food delivery equipment or services e. Awards, honoraria, prizes, gifts, or incentives f. Equipment or technology not specifically needed to carry out the goals of the grant g. Transportation/travel for project participants or non-grant funded personnel Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 5 of 17 h. Databases currently offered or similar to ones offered by the agency (i.e., a magazine index database may not be purchased if a comparable one is provided by the agency) i. Collection development purchases not targeted directly to the grant goals nor integral to the service program j. Advertising or public relations costs not directly related to promoting awareness of grant-funded activities k. Performers or presenters whose purpose is to entertain rather than to educate l. Other expenses as excluded in the grant guidelines D. Application and Submission Information TSLAC strongly encourages potential applicants to review the TSLAC grants webpage (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants) to learn more about the grant programs and process. Additional guidance on applying for a TSLAC grant is available via video on YouTube (How to Apply for a TSLAC Grant). Project Development and Draft Review The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) recommends that applicants discuss their projects with TSLAC staff before developing a proposal. TSLAC consultants are available to help throughout application development and in determining the best grant program for your project. For more information, contact the TSLAC Grants Team via e-mail at grants@tsl.texas.gov. TSLAC also strongly encourages applicants to submit a draft of the proposal to TSLAC for review. TSLAC has created a Microsoft® Word® grant application template, available on the TSLAC website at https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants/programs. Applicants may use this template when preparing a draft, which can then be used to populate the online application. Please note that the online application will not accept tables, charts, or images. To allow adequate time to review the draft proposal, submit the draft via e-mail to grants@tsl.texas.gov, with the subject line “2026 Draft Proposal,” by Monday, January 6, 2025. Grant Management System (GMS) Access TSLAC uses a grant management system or GMS that enables applicants to apply for grants electronically through a web portal at https://grants.tsl.texas.gov. Applications and required documents must be submitted in GMS by the due date to be eligible for consideration. To submit your application online, you must have an active GMS account. To create or activate an account, please have your library director submit a completed GMS Import Template (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants/forms-tools) to grants@tsl.texas.gov. The e-mail should reference “GMS Access” in the subject line. TSLAC staff will review the request and grant appropriate access. If needed because of difficulty using the Internet or for other accessibility reasons, potential applicants may request paper copies of materials from the TSLAC Grants Team via e-mail at grants@tsl.texas.gov. Application Components The grant application consists of the following MANDATORY components to be submitted in GMS by the deadline: 1. Application certification form (print, sign, and upload) 2. Program narrative and budget 3. Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) certification form (print, sign, and upload) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 6 of 17 4. Letters of cooperation (if applicable) — If the project is collaborative in nature, letters of cooperation indicating commitment of time, funds, volunteers, or other resources must be submitted from all participating organizations. Letters should be addressed to TSLAC Grants Team, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, Texas 78711-2927. Applicants are encouraged to upload letters in GMS. Letters of support are optional. A maximum of three (3) letters of general support may also be submitted. Letters should be addressed to TSLAC Grants Team, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, Texas 78711-2927. Applicants are encouraged to upload letters in GMS. Additional information about application components may be found at TSLAC Grants FAQ. Other requirements Before submitting an application, applicant organizations must have a current and active federal Unique Entity ID (UEI). The federal government uses a unique identifier for each entity (company, nonprofit, organization, etc.) that does business with the federal government. If you are currently registered in SAM.gov, you’ve been assigned a SAM Unique Entity ID. It’s viewable on your entity registration record in SAM.gov. If you have never registered at SAM.gov or have never applied for a grant with TSLAC or other state or federal agency, you will need to initiate the process of obtaining a SAM UEI at SAM.gov. To get started registering your entity, to renew your registration, or for more information, visit SAM.gov or to refer to the Quick Start Guide for Getting a Unique Entity ID, published by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). Who can submit the online application? Any individual authorized to use GMS and having the correct security role will be able to submit the application in GMS. Applicants will still be required to submit the signed application certification form in GMS. The application certification form must be signed by an individual authorized to enter into contracts with the State of Texas (e.g., county judge, city manager, etc.). Deadline and Submission Completed applications and all required documents must be submitted in GMS by 11:59 p.m. Central Time, Monday, February 10, 2025. Please note that technical support will not be available after 5 p.m. If you are unable to submit your application and/or required documentation via GMS, you may submit documents via mail, e-mail, or fax. Please send to the attention of: 2026 Grants, Library Development & Networking Division, via e-mail to grants@tsl.texas.gov, fax at 512-936-2306, or mail to Library Development & Networking Division, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, TX 78711, (TSLAC street address: 1201 Brazos, Austin, TX 78701). Required items must be postmarked no later than February 10, 2025. Late submissions may be considered for review on a case-by-case basis following the TSLAC protest procedures as outlined in Section F (13 TAC §2.55) and decision by the Director and Librarian. Program Timeline November 2024 Guidelines released and application opens January 6, 2025 Last day to submit draft proposals to TSLAC for comment (optional) February 10, 2025 Applications and required forms due in GMS Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 7 of 17 Feb-April 2025 Application packets evaluated by Grant Review Panel April 2025 Applicants notified of Grant Review Panel recommendations June 2025 Commission meets and approves projects July 1, 2025 Projects begin May 31, 2026 Final day to encumber grant funds June 30, 2026 Projects end July 31, 2026 Last day to submit final request for funds and documentation E. Application Review Information Criteria for Award This grant program is competitive. The Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) Grant Review Panel will score proposals on the eight criteria listed below (13 TAC §2.412). The maximum number of points for each category is shown. Additional points will be awarded to applicants who meet the following criteria: • Applicant library will receive 5 points if they have not received a TSLAC grant in the past 5 years. • Applicant library will receive 5 points if they serve a community with a population of 30,000 or less. These points are cumulative. Libraries will be awarded points for each criterion they meet. The detailed scoring rubric that will be used by the LSTA Grant Review Panel is provided on the following pages. 1. Needs Assessment (15 points) • Describe why the program is needed, the program goals, and the targeted audience. • Describe the greater community to be served using demographic statistics, library records, or surveys to support these statements. • Attach letters of cooperation demonstrating commitment to the project from all agencies involved. 2. Program Design (20 points) • Thoroughly describe the services, programs, and activities; describe the location where they will be offered. • Explain how these services will attract shared library users. • Collaborative projects have priority and inclusion of relevant community organizations is encouraged. 3. Project Impact (15 points) • Describe the impact your project will have on library services and users regionally or statewide. This may include how the proposed project is a model program that would benefit other communities. 4. Personnel (5 points) • Identify who will administer the funds and which positions will provide the services. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 8 of 17 • List how much time will be spent in each position on assigned duties. • List how the qualifications of each person relate to their job duties. Full job descriptions are required for new hires. 5. Timetable (5 points) • Present a timetable for project activities within the project year (state fiscal year) (i.e., a list of actions with a date by which they will be accomplished). • Provide verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. • Explain how staff will be hired and trained in time to carry out the services as planned. 6. Evaluation (10 points) • Set achievable, measurable outcomes and present a reasonable method to collect data. • Present a method to count users of the services, as well as measure the effectiveness of the service. • Funded programs will also be required to evaluate their programs in accordance with Legislative Budget Board (LBB) measures and IMLS tools. 7. Budget (20 points) • Provide a complete budget for the proposed project and fully justify the budget by describing how budgeted items will contribute to the project. • Identify a source for the stated costs (e.g., city pay classification for staff, catalog, city/county bid list for equipment, or vendor quote). • Explain how costs are reasonable to achieve project objectives. If new staff members are to be hired, grant applicants should consider the time for a realistic hiring process to occur. There is no requirement for cost sharing, matching funds, or cost participation with this grant program. 8. Sustainability (10 points) • Describe the resources that will be used to support the services developed through the grant in the future. A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is desirable, but not required. Peer Review (13 TAC §2.113) (a) To be eligible for review, each application must be submitted by the specified deadlines with all required components and all necessary authorization signatures. (b) Agency staff will review each application for the following: a. Legal eligibility of the institution to participate in a grant program and appropriate authorizing signature; b. Conformance to the federal and state regulations pertaining to grants; c. Inclusion of unallowable costs; d. Errors in arithmetic or cost calculations; e. Submission of all required forms; f. Compliance with submissions procedures and deadlines; and g. Relevance and appropriateness of the project design and activities to the purpose of the grant program. (c) Agency staff will raise issues and questions regarding the needs, methods, staffing and costs of the applications. Staff will also raise concerns regarding the relevance and appropriateness of the project Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 9 of 17 design and activities to the purpose of the grant program. Staff comments will be sent to the review panel with the applications for consideration by the panel. (d) Applicants will be sent a copy of the staff comments to give applicant an opportunity to respond in writing. Applicants may not modify the proposal in any way; however, applicants’ responses to staff comments will be distributed to the panel. a. Applicatiosn with significant errors, omissions, or eligibility problems will note be rated. Applications in which the project design and activities are not relevant and appropriate to the purpose of the grant program will be ineligible. b. Agency staff will be available to offer technical assistance to reviewers. (e) The agency may use peer review panels to evaluate applications in competitive grant programs. (1) Peer reviewers may include professionals, citizens, community leaders, and agency and library staff to evaluate grant applications. Peer reviewers must have appropriate training or service on citizen boards in an oversight capacity and may not evaluate grant applications in which there is, or is a possible appearance of, a conflict of interest. (2) The agency staff will distribute selected applications to reviewers and will provide written instructions or training for peer reviewers. Reviewers must complete any training prior to reviewing applications. (3) The reviewers will score each application according to the review criteria and requirements stated in the grant guidelines. (4) Each evaluation of an application for competitive grants shall be appropriately documented by the peer reviewer conducting the evaluation. The documentation shall include the scores assigned by the peer reviewer. The peer reviewer may also include comments that may be shared with the applicant. (f) Applications will be scored using the following process: (1) The peer reviewers will review all complete and eligible grant applications forwarded to them by agency staff and complete a rating form for each. Each reviewer will evaluate the proposal in relation to the specific requirements of the criteria and will assign a value, depending on the points assigned to each criterion. (2) No reviewer who is associated with an applicant or who stands to benefit directly from an application will serve on the review panel for the grant program in which the application is submitted for that grant cycle. Any reviewer who is associated with a potential applicant in the respective category must inform the agency and their organization about a potential conflict of interest. Any reviewer who feels unable to evaluate a particular application fairly may choose not to review that application. (3) Reviewers will consider and assess the strengths and weaknesses of any proposed project only on the basis of the documents submitted. Considerations of geographical distribution, demographics, type of library, or personality will not influence the assessment of a proposal by the review panel. The panel members must make their own individual decisions regarding the applications. The panel may discuss applications, but the panel's recommendations will be compiled from the individual assessments, not as the result of a collective decision or vote. (4) Reviewers may not discuss proposals with any applicant before the proposals are reviewed. Agency staff is available to provide technical assistance to reviewers. Agency staff will conduct all negotiations and communication with the applicants. (5) Reviewers may recommend setting conditions for funding a given application or group of applications (e.g., adjusting the project budget, revising project objectives, modifying the timetable, amending evaluation methodology, etc.). The recommendation must include a Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 10 of 17 statement of the reasons for setting such conditions. Reviewers who are ineligible to evaluate a given proposal will not participate in the discussion of funding conditions. (6) Reviewers will submit their evaluation forms to the agency. In order to be counted, the forms must arrive before the specified due date. Funding Decisions (13 TAC §2.114) (a) The agency staff will submit a recommended priority-ranked list of applicants for possible funding. Final approval of a grant award will be made by the commission in an open meeting. (b) Applications for grant funding will be evaluated only upon the information provided in the written application, including attachments, if any. (c) The agency staff may negotiate with selected applicants to determine the terms of the award. To receive an award, the applicant must accept any additional or special terms and conditions listed in the grant contract and any changes in the grant application. (d) The agency staff will notify unsuccessful applicants in writing. (e) The agency has the right to reject applications or cancel or modify a grant solicitation at any point before a contract is signed. The award of any grant is subject to the availability of funds. Grant Recommendation and Award Process (13 TAC §2.115) To be considered eligible for funding, any application must receive a minimum adjusted mean score of more than 60 percent of the maximum points available. However, eligibility does not guarantee funding. The commission may also choose to award extra points to libraries that have not received funding within a specified time frame to be determined by the agency or that have limited resources. To reduce the impact of scores that exceedingly high or low, or otherwise outside the range of scores from other reviewers, agency staff will tabulate the panel’s work using calculations such as an adjusted mean score. (1) Applications will be ranked in priority order by score for consideration by the commission. (2) If insufficient funds remain to fully fund the next application, the staff may negotiate a reduced grant with the next ranked applicant. (3) If the panel recommends funding an application that, for legal, fiscal, or other reason, is unacceptable to the staff, a contrary recommendation will be made. The applicant will be informed of this situation prior to presentation to the commission and may negotiate a revision to the application. A positive recommendation to the commission will be contingent upon successfully completing these negotiations prior to the commission meeting. If the panel is unable to produce a set of recommendations for funding, the agency staff will use the same evaluation procedures to develop recommendations to the commission. Multiple Applications (13 TAC §2.119) Applicants for competitive grants may submit more than one grant application in the same grant cycle only if: (1) the applications are for different projects in different grant programs and the applications are not the same, or nearly the same; or (2) the grant program has specified separate categories for application and the proposals submitted are not the same, or nearly the same, project. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 11 of 17 Scoring Rubric Project Scoring Total in Eight Areas: 100 points Relevance and appropriateness of the project design and activities to the goals and purpose of the Special Projects grant program will be considered in the scoring of all criteria. Members of the LSTA Grant Review Panel may score each criterion as follows: 0-1 points: Project does not meet the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. 2-3 points: Project partially meets the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. 4-5 points: Project is a clear fit for the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. Abstract • Overview and summary of project • Concise (1,000 characters) • Includes: who, what, where, when, why, for whom 1. Needs Assessment (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 3; Final score = 15 max) • Applicant should describe why the program is needed, the program goals and audience. • They should describe the greater community to be served and include demographic statistics, library records, or surveys to support these statements. • They attach letters of cooperation showing commitment to the project from agencies to be involved. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Provides no evidence of need for program. • Program goals and audience are not defined. • Does not describe needs assessment process and/or how need was determined (i.e., no description of community served, demographic statistics, library records or evidence or surveys). • If partners are part of the Project, no letters of support are provided. • Provides partial/some evidence of need for program. • Program goals and audience are defined but show little to no connection to description of need. • Needs assessment process seems vague and incompletely describes how stated need was determined. • If partners are part of the Project, letters of support are provided. • Provides clear and convincing evidence of need for program and why they are best suited to meet this need. • Program goals and audience are clearly connected to description of need. • Clearly describes needs assessment process including how stated need was determined (e.g., statistics, records, surveys). • If partners are part of the Project, letters of support are provided that clearly define roles and responsibilities of partnering agencies. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 12 of 17 2. Program Design (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 4; Final score = 20 max) • Applicant thoroughly describes the services, programs, and activities; describe the location where they will be offered. • Explain how these services will attract shared library users. • Collaborative projects have priority and inclusion of relevant community organizations is encouraged. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Services, programs and activities lack definition and are unclear. Project appears to lack direction and planning and does not relate to described needs. • Does not describe location(s) where project will be offered or is vague. • Does not describe how project services will attract library users. • Issue of collaboration not addressed. • Services, programs and activities are defined. Project has direction and some relationship to described needs. • Location where services will be offered is described but does not clearly relate to project activities and described needs. • Describes how project services will attract library users. • Issue of collaboration addressed, even if not a collaborative project. • Services, programs and activities are clearly defined, including timelines and resources required. Project shows evidence of clear direction and planning and strong relationship to described needs. • Location where services will be offered is described and clearly relates to project activities and described needs. • Clearly describes how project services will attract library users and ties to project activities and described needs. • Collaborative project; collaboration clearly addressed and described in full. 3. Project Impact (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 3; Final score = 15 max) • Applicant describes the impact their project will have on library services and users locally as well as regionally or statewide. • This may include how the proposed project is a model project that would benefit other regions of the state. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not address any of the impacts the project may have on library services and library users. • Does not address larger issues that the project may address. • Describes impact of the project but doesn’t show an association with the library services and library users. • Addresses larger issues but does not tie these issues to local project. • Describes both impact and measurable benefits the project will have on library services and library users. • Addresses larger issues clearly and ties them to local project. 4. Personnel (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 1; Final score = 5 max) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 13 of 17 • Applicant identifies who will administer the funds and which positions will provide the services. • Applicant lists how much time will be spent in each position on assigned duties. • Applicant lists how the qualifications of each person relate to their job duties. Full job descriptions are required for new hires. Provide verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not identify fiscal agent and which positions will provide services. • No description of time spent in each position. on assigned duties • No description of qualifications of key personnel. • No job descriptions for new hires. • Fiscal agent identified without explanation and positions briefly described. • Time spent on project by each staff member briefly identified. • Some description of qualifications of key personnel. • Partial or seemingly incomplete job descriptions available for new hires. • Fiscal agent identified with full explanation and positions that will provide the services fully described. • Time spent on project by each staff member identified and justified. • Describes qualifications of key personnel in detail, including experience with similar projects, and how each will contribute to the project’s success. • Full job descriptions provided for new hires. 5. Timetable (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 1; Final score = 5 max) • Applicants presents a timetable for project activities within the fiscal year (i.e., a list of actions with a date by which they will be accomplished). • Applicant provides verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. • Applicants explain how staff will be hired and trained in time to carry out the services as planned. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Timetable is missing or incomplete (i.e., does not include a list of actions with specific target dates for completion). • No verification regarding facilities, equipment and/or materials. • No explanation of hiring or training of staff to carry out project in project period. • Timetable exists but is not clearly relevant to achieving the project goals. • Timetable seems unachievable within the project period. • Some verification regarding facilities, equipment and/or materials, but not clearly related to project. • Brief or incomplete explanation of hiring or training of staff to carry out project in project period. • No time given for staff to be hired, if applicable. • Timetable includes a list of actions with specific target dates and is clearly relevant to achieving the established objectives. • Timetable seems achievable within the project period. • Use of facilities, equipment and/or materials fully explained and relevant to project and project goals. • Full explanation of hiring or training of staff that will allow project to be carried out during the project period. • Realistic timeline given for hiring of new staff, if applicable. 6. Evaluation (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 2; Final score = 10 max) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 14 of 17 • Applicants set achievable, measurable outcomes, and present a reasonable method to collect data. • Applicants present a method to count users of the services as well as measure the effectiveness of the services using IMLS tools and LBB measures. Note: Some projects will not lend themselves to outcomes-based evaluation (OBE). TSLAC strongly encourages the use of OBE, we do not require it for proposals, and points should not be deducted from strong evaluation plans that use outputs instead of outcomes when it is reasonable not to employ OBE. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not include either project outputs or outcomes. • No method to collect data provided. • No method to count users of services or measure effectiveness of services. • Will not determine success of the project. • Provides project outputs and/or outcomes but do not clearly relate to project. • Method to collect data provided. • Method to count users of services provided, but not to measure effectiveness of services. • Provides some indication of the success of the project. • Clearly describes appropriate project outputs and/or outcomes. • Method to collect data is provided that clearly relates to project services and documented need. • Method to count users of services and measure effectiveness of services provided. • Will effectively determine success of the project and its impact. • Project evaluation can be used as model for other similar projects. • Project evaluation incorporates “best practices” from other similar projects. 7. Budget (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 4; Final score = 20 max) • Applicants provide a complete budget for the proposed project. • Applicant fully justifies the budget by describing how budgeted items will contribute to the project and identifies a source for the stated costs (e.g., city pay classification for staff, catalog or city/county bid list for equipment). • The costs are reasonable to achieve project objectives. • If new staff members are to be hired, applicants consider the time for a realistic hiring process to occur. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Budget table is incomplete. • Provides no narrative description (justification), beyond the budget column, of how funds will be spent. • Budget table is complete. • Budget narrative description exists but does not clearly relate to the project and sources for costs are not stated. • Budget table is complete and clearly describes how the dollars will be used for the project. • Clearly identifies source of stated costs and justification for their reasonableness. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 15 of 17 • Items listed in the budget description do not match those in the budget form. • Costs do not seem reasonable, and description is unclear. • Items listed in the budget description match those in the budget form. 8. Sustainability (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 2; Final score = 10 max) • Applicants describe the resources that will be used to support and sustain the services developed through the grant in the future. • A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is desirable, but not required. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Description of resources used to support and sustain the project after grant completion is vague and unspecific. • Some evidence of future support and sustainability described. • Clear evidence of sustainability described. • A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is provided, if applicable. 9. Extra Points – Up to 10 Extra Points 5 points: Awarded if applicant library serves a community with a population of 30,000 or less. 5 points: Awarded if applicant library has not received a TSLAC grant in the past 5 years. F. Award Administration Information Notice of Award Applicants will be notified of the grant review panel’s recommendations via e-mail. The notification will include the applicant rankings, panel recommendation, panel comments and scores relevant to respective applications, and protest procedures, which are also included in this notice. The panel recommendations will be submitted to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission at its August meeting for consideration and approval. Once the awards have been approved, successful applicants will receive instructions on how to proceed and mandatory training required for all TSLAC competitive grant recipients. Protest Procedure — Texas State Library and Archives Commission, 13 TAC §2.55 (a) An aggrieved person who is not satisfied with a decision, procedure, or service received from the staff of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission or who is an actual or prospective bidder, grantee, or contractor aggrieved in connection with a solicitation, evaluation, or award may file a protest with the Director and Librarian in accordance with this rule. (b) A protest must be submitted to the Director and Librarian within 21 days after the person knows or should have known of the matter which is protested. The Director and Librarian has the discretion to allow a protest filed after 21 days if the protestant shows good cause for the late filing or if the protest raises an issue significant to the general policies and procedures of the commission. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 16 of 17 (c) The protestant shall mail or deliver a copy of the protest to all interested persons. The Director and Librarian will furnish a list of interested persons to a protestant. For protests of a competitive selection (bid, contract, or grant), interested persons shall include all persons who have submitted a bid, proposal, or application. (d) A protest must be in writing and identified as a protest under this section, and contain the following: (1) A description of the protestant's interest in the matter (2) The issue(s) to be resolved and remedy(s) requested (3) The protestant's argument supporting the protest, including a statement of relevant facts and applicable law, specifying the statutes, rules, or other legal authority alleged to have been violated (4) The protestant's affirmation that facts set forth in the protest are true (5) A certification that a copy of the protest has been mailed or delivered to all interested persons (e) Upon receipt of a protest conforming to the requirements of this section, the commission shall not proceed with the solicitation, award, or contract until the protest is resolved, unless the Director and Librarian makes a written determination that delay would harm the substantial interests of the state. (f) The Director and Librarian has the authority to decide, settle, or resolve the protest and will make a written determination. The Director and Librarian may solicit written responses to the protest from other parties. The Director and Librarian shall inform the protesting party and other interested parties by letter of his determination, and how to appeal the determination to the commission. (g) An interested party may appeal the determination of the Director and Librarian. An appeal must be in writing and conform to paragraphs (1) - (3) of this subsection: (1) The appeal must be received in the office of the Director and Librarian no later than 15 days after the date the determination is mailed to interested parties; (2) A copy of the appeal must be mailed or delivered by the appealing party to all interested parties and contain a certification of mailing or delivery; (3) The appealing party must state whether or not an opportunity is requested to make an oral presentation to the commission in open meeting. (h) The Director and Librarian shall refer the matter to the commission for their consideration at an open meeting. (i) The chair of the commission has the discretion to allow an appeal filed more than 15 days after the Director and Librarian's determination if the appealing party shows good cause for the late filing or if the appeal raises an issue significant to the general policies or procedures of the commission. (j) An interested party may file a response to an appeal of the determination of the Director and Librarian no later than seven days after the appeal is mailed or delivered. (k) Copies of the appeal and responses of interested parties, if any, shall be mailed to the commission by the Director and Librarian. (l) The chair of the commission has the discretion to decide whether or not a request for oral presentations will be granted and will set the order and amount of time for oral presentations that are allowed. The chair also has the discretion to decide whether presentations and written documents presented by Commission staff and interested parties will be allowed. (m) The commission will determine properly filed appeals and make its decision in open meeting. The commission shall vote to uphold or reverse the decision of the Director and Librarian. Failing a majority vote of a quorum of the commission, the Director and Librarian’s decision is upheld. The Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 17 of 17 commission's decision is final and not subject to judicial review under the statutes governing the commission. (n) A decision issued either by the commission in open meeting or in writing by the Director and Librarian shall be the final administrative action of the commission. (o) Documentation concerning a protest of a competitive selection is part of the commission's records series for that selection and is retained in accordance with the commission's approved records retention schedule. Policy Requirements TSLAC competitive grant recipients are subject to the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS) (https://comptroller.texas.gov/purchasing/docs/grant-management-reader.pdf) and federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (also known as the Uniform Guidance) (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title- 2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200). Reporting Grantees must submit financial and performance reports at scheduled intervals throughout the reporting period as will be outlined in the grant contract. Reports will be submitted electronically through TSLAC’s Grant Management System (GMS). G. Contacts TSLAC staff members are available during regular business hours (8 a.m.-5 p.m., Central) to assist with competitive grants. Dominic Gonzales, Grants Administrator Phone: 512-463-5581 Fax: 512-936-2306 E-mail: grants@tsl.texas.gov Taylor Gardner, Grants Coordinator Phone: 512-463-5468 Fax: 512-936-2306 E-mail: grants@tsl.texas.gov State Fiscal Year FY 2026 Grant Program * Special Projects 75 2026 Project Title * Schertz Public Library Outreach Vehicle Application Number 3100 Organization Name Schertz Public Library 798 Schertz Pkwy Schertz TX 78154-1954 Project Manager * Melissa Uhlhorn muhlhorn@schertz.com Phone Number: Email: Legal Entity City of Schertz 798 Schertz Pkwy Schertz TX 78154-1954 EIN: Federal Unique Entity ID: SAM Exp. Date: WP19CJPW5PK5 210-619-1701 44 25 15 Modified On 1/23/2025 7:18 PM State House District: State Senate District: US Congress District: I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the statements made in this application are true, that the information provided is correct, and that I am authorized to enter into legally binding commitments on behalf of the applicant organization. Application Approved by (name):        ________________________________________________________________ Job Title:  ________________________________________________________________ Date:  ________________________________________________________________ Signature:  ________________________________________________________________ Notice of Funding Opportunity State Fiscal Year (SFY) 2026 Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines Application Due Date: Wednesday, February 10, 2025 Library Development & Networking Division October 2024 Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 2 of 17 Table of Contents A. Program Description .................................................................................................................. 3 B. Award Information ..................................................................................................................... 3 C. Eligibility Information .................................................................................................................. 4 D. Application and Submission Information ................................................................................. 4 E. Application Review Information ............................................................................................... 7 F. Award Administration Information ......................................................................................... 15 G. Contacts ................................................................................................................................... 17 Comments regarding the programs and services of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission can be addressed to: Director and Librarian P. O. Box 12927  Austin, Texas 78711-2927 512-463-5460  512-463-5436 fax Cover image: Courtesy of Bigstock Photo. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 3 of 17 A. Program Description Goals and Purposes This grant program provides funds for programs that expand library services to include all members of the library’s community. It enables libraries to develop programs for populations with special needs or those having difficulty using the library. Programs focusing on community engagement or involving collaboration with other community organizations are strongly encouraged. Programs must emphasize improved services by the library to its customers. These programs must meet the following LSTA goals as identified in the 2023-2027 LSTA 5-Year Plan (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/sites/default/files/public/tslac/ld/pubs/lstaplan/IMLS%20LSTA%20Five- Year%20Plan%202023-2027%20-%20Texas%20-%20FINAL.pdf): Goals • Through Texas libraries, Texans will have access to digital resources and services needed to help them navigate the digital information landscape successfully. • Texans will have access to library materials and services that support literacy and educational attainment, especially early childhood and family literacy, workforce readiness, and lifelong learning. • Texans will receive library services from trained library staff that effectively respond to community needs. The purpose of this grant program is not for collection development or other activities primarily focused on the acquisition of library materials or resources, or digitization projects. Applications for FY 2026 may be submitted in one of two Special Projects programs — Special Projects 25 or Special Projects 75. Applicants may not apply for both programs in the same program year. Special Projects 25 will support eligible projects for a single year with grant funding up to $25,000. Projects will not be eligible for additional TSLAC grant funding beyond the initial grant period. Special Projects 75 will support larger projects implemented over multiple years within the TSLAC guidelines. Single year funding may not exceed $75,000. Successful applicants will be eligible to apply for additional grant funds to support work on the project for up to two consecutive years following the initial year of funding. B. Award Information Approximately $750,000 is expected to be available for Special Projects Grants, subject to approval by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission and the availability of funds. Funding is provided by the U.S. Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS) as a subaward of IMLS’ Grants to States Program under the Library Services and Technology Act. Assistance Listing Number/Title: 45.310 Grants to States Maximum Award Applications of all sizes are encouraged. While the request may be part of a larger program, awards will not exceed $25,000 for Special Projects 25 or $75,000 for Special Projects 75. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 4 of 17 Length of Funding Funding will be for one year (July 1, 2025–June 30, 2026). Successful applicants under the Special Projects 75 grant are eligible to apply for grant funds to support work on the same project for up to two consecutive years following the initial grant period for a total of three consecutive years of funding. C. Eligibility Information Through their governing authority, accredited public libraries, local public library systems, libraries that are members of the TexShare Library Consortium, or nonprofit organizations that are applying on behalf of accredited libraries and/or TexShare members, are eligible to apply for funds. An applicant that is a nonprofit organization is eligible only if the organization’s organizational charter, operating guidelines, or mission statement includes providing direct support for affiliated library activities and goals as a defined objective. Public library applicants must be accredited by the Texas State Library and Archives Commission for the fiscal year in which the grant contracts are issued. Applicants may only submit one application for consideration under the Special Projects grant program per funding cycle. As noted above, successful applicants under the Special Projects 75 grant are eligible to apply for grant funds under the same program for the two consecutive years following the initial grant year. Funding in the initial or a subsequent grant period does not guarantee funding in future grant periods. The second- and third-year applications will be evaluated on the same criteria as new applications. No applicant will be eligible for a fourth year of funding for the same project. Eligible Expenses This grant program may fund costs for staff, equipment**, capital expenditures, supplies, professional services, indirect costs, and other typical expenses, as permitted by the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS). The purpose of this grant is not for collection development, or other activities primarily focused on the acquisition of library materials or resources outside of the proposed program, or digitization projects, except as noted in the grant guidelines. There is no requirement for cost sharing, matching funds, or cost participation with this grant program. ** Equipment costing $10,000 or more per unit will require approval from IMLS before purchase. Ineligible Expenses Except as provided in grant guidelines, competitive grants may NOT fund the following expenses: a. Capital expenditures related to the purchase of real property or buildings b. Capital expenditures related to the construction or expansion of facilities, including fixtures and services c. Capital expenditures related to renovation costs, including fixtures and services d. Food, beverages, or food delivery equipment or services e. Awards, honoraria, prizes, gifts, or incentives f. Equipment or technology not specifically needed to carry out the goals of the grant g. Transportation/travel for project participants or non-grant funded personnel Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 5 of 17 h. Databases currently offered or similar to ones offered by the agency (i.e., a magazine index database may not be purchased if a comparable one is provided by the agency) i. Collection development purchases not targeted directly to the grant goals nor integral to the service program j. Advertising or public relations costs not directly related to promoting awareness of grant-funded activities k. Performers or presenters whose purpose is to entertain rather than to educate l. Other expenses as excluded in the grant guidelines D. Application and Submission Information TSLAC strongly encourages potential applicants to review the TSLAC grants webpage (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants) to learn more about the grant programs and process. Additional guidance on applying for a TSLAC grant is available via video on YouTube (How to Apply for a TSLAC Grant). Project Development and Draft Review The Texas State Library and Archives Commission (TSLAC) recommends that applicants discuss their projects with TSLAC staff before developing a proposal. TSLAC consultants are available to help throughout application development and in determining the best grant program for your project. For more information, contact the TSLAC Grants Team via e-mail at grants@tsl.texas.gov. TSLAC also strongly encourages applicants to submit a draft of the proposal to TSLAC for review. TSLAC has created a Microsoft® Word® grant application template, available on the TSLAC website at https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants/programs. Applicants may use this template when preparing a draft, which can then be used to populate the online application. Please note that the online application will not accept tables, charts, or images. To allow adequate time to review the draft proposal, submit the draft via e-mail to grants@tsl.texas.gov, with the subject line “2026 Draft Proposal,” by Monday, January 6, 2025. Grant Management System (GMS) Access TSLAC uses a grant management system or GMS that enables applicants to apply for grants electronically through a web portal at https://grants.tsl.texas.gov. Applications and required documents must be submitted in GMS by the due date to be eligible for consideration. To submit your application online, you must have an active GMS account. To create or activate an account, please have your library director submit a completed GMS Import Template (https://www.tsl.texas.gov/ldn/grants/forms-tools) to grants@tsl.texas.gov. The e-mail should reference “GMS Access” in the subject line. TSLAC staff will review the request and grant appropriate access. If needed because of difficulty using the Internet or for other accessibility reasons, potential applicants may request paper copies of materials from the TSLAC Grants Team via e-mail at grants@tsl.texas.gov. Application Components The grant application consists of the following MANDATORY components to be submitted in GMS by the deadline: 1. Application certification form (print, sign, and upload) 2. Program narrative and budget 3. Children’s Internet Protection Act (CIPA) certification form (print, sign, and upload) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 6 of 17 4. Letters of cooperation (if applicable) — If the project is collaborative in nature, letters of cooperation indicating commitment of time, funds, volunteers, or other resources must be submitted from all participating organizations. Letters should be addressed to TSLAC Grants Team, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, Texas 78711-2927. Applicants are encouraged to upload letters in GMS. Letters of support are optional. A maximum of three (3) letters of general support may also be submitted. Letters should be addressed to TSLAC Grants Team, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, Texas 78711-2927. Applicants are encouraged to upload letters in GMS. Additional information about application components may be found at TSLAC Grants FAQ. Other requirements Before submitting an application, applicant organizations must have a current and active federal Unique Entity ID (UEI). The federal government uses a unique identifier for each entity (company, nonprofit, organization, etc.) that does business with the federal government. If you are currently registered in SAM.gov, you’ve been assigned a SAM Unique Entity ID. It’s viewable on your entity registration record in SAM.gov. If you have never registered at SAM.gov or have never applied for a grant with TSLAC or other state or federal agency, you will need to initiate the process of obtaining a SAM UEI at SAM.gov. To get started registering your entity, to renew your registration, or for more information, visit SAM.gov or to refer to the Quick Start Guide for Getting a Unique Entity ID, published by the U.S. General Services Administration (GSA). Who can submit the online application? Any individual authorized to use GMS and having the correct security role will be able to submit the application in GMS. Applicants will still be required to submit the signed application certification form in GMS. The application certification form must be signed by an individual authorized to enter into contracts with the State of Texas (e.g., county judge, city manager, etc.). Deadline and Submission Completed applications and all required documents must be submitted in GMS by 11:59 p.m. Central Time, Monday, February 10, 2025. Please note that technical support will not be available after 5 p.m. If you are unable to submit your application and/or required documentation via GMS, you may submit documents via mail, e-mail, or fax. Please send to the attention of: 2026 Grants, Library Development & Networking Division, via e-mail to grants@tsl.texas.gov, fax at 512-936-2306, or mail to Library Development & Networking Division, TSLAC, P. O. Box 12927, Austin, TX 78711, (TSLAC street address: 1201 Brazos, Austin, TX 78701). Required items must be postmarked no later than February 10, 2025. Late submissions may be considered for review on a case-by-case basis following the TSLAC protest procedures as outlined in Section F (13 TAC §2.55) and decision by the Director and Librarian. Program Timeline November 2024 Guidelines released and application opens January 6, 2025 Last day to submit draft proposals to TSLAC for comment (optional) February 10, 2025 Applications and required forms due in GMS Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 7 of 17 Feb-April 2025 Application packets evaluated by Grant Review Panel April 2025 Applicants notified of Grant Review Panel recommendations June 2025 Commission meets and approves projects July 1, 2025 Projects begin May 31, 2026 Final day to encumber grant funds June 30, 2026 Projects end July 31, 2026 Last day to submit final request for funds and documentation E. Application Review Information Criteria for Award This grant program is competitive. The Library Services and Technology Act (LSTA) Grant Review Panel will score proposals on the eight criteria listed below (13 TAC §2.412). The maximum number of points for each category is shown. Additional points will be awarded to applicants who meet the following criteria: • Applicant library will receive 5 points if they have not received a TSLAC grant in the past 5 years. • Applicant library will receive 5 points if they serve a community with a population of 30,000 or less. These points are cumulative. Libraries will be awarded points for each criterion they meet. The detailed scoring rubric that will be used by the LSTA Grant Review Panel is provided on the following pages. 1. Needs Assessment (15 points) • Describe why the program is needed, the program goals, and the targeted audience. • Describe the greater community to be served using demographic statistics, library records, or surveys to support these statements. • Attach letters of cooperation demonstrating commitment to the project from all agencies involved. 2. Program Design (20 points) • Thoroughly describe the services, programs, and activities; describe the location where they will be offered. • Explain how these services will attract shared library users. • Collaborative projects have priority and inclusion of relevant community organizations is encouraged. 3. Project Impact (15 points) • Describe the impact your project will have on library services and users regionally or statewide. This may include how the proposed project is a model program that would benefit other communities. 4. Personnel (5 points) • Identify who will administer the funds and which positions will provide the services. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 8 of 17 • List how much time will be spent in each position on assigned duties. • List how the qualifications of each person relate to their job duties. Full job descriptions are required for new hires. 5. Timetable (5 points) • Present a timetable for project activities within the project year (state fiscal year) (i.e., a list of actions with a date by which they will be accomplished). • Provide verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. • Explain how staff will be hired and trained in time to carry out the services as planned. 6. Evaluation (10 points) • Set achievable, measurable outcomes and present a reasonable method to collect data. • Present a method to count users of the services, as well as measure the effectiveness of the service. • Funded programs will also be required to evaluate their programs in accordance with Legislative Budget Board (LBB) measures and IMLS tools. 7. Budget (20 points) • Provide a complete budget for the proposed project and fully justify the budget by describing how budgeted items will contribute to the project. • Identify a source for the stated costs (e.g., city pay classification for staff, catalog, city/county bid list for equipment, or vendor quote). • Explain how costs are reasonable to achieve project objectives. If new staff members are to be hired, grant applicants should consider the time for a realistic hiring process to occur. There is no requirement for cost sharing, matching funds, or cost participation with this grant program. 8. Sustainability (10 points) • Describe the resources that will be used to support the services developed through the grant in the future. A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is desirable, but not required. Peer Review (13 TAC §2.113) (a) To be eligible for review, each application must be submitted by the specified deadlines with all required components and all necessary authorization signatures. (b) Agency staff will review each application for the following: a. Legal eligibility of the institution to participate in a grant program and appropriate authorizing signature; b. Conformance to the federal and state regulations pertaining to grants; c. Inclusion of unallowable costs; d. Errors in arithmetic or cost calculations; e. Submission of all required forms; f. Compliance with submissions procedures and deadlines; and g. Relevance and appropriateness of the project design and activities to the purpose of the grant program. (c) Agency staff will raise issues and questions regarding the needs, methods, staffing and costs of the applications. Staff will also raise concerns regarding the relevance and appropriateness of the project Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 9 of 17 design and activities to the purpose of the grant program. Staff comments will be sent to the review panel with the applications for consideration by the panel. (d) Applicants will be sent a copy of the staff comments to give applicant an opportunity to respond in writing. Applicants may not modify the proposal in any way; however, applicants’ responses to staff comments will be distributed to the panel. a. Applicatiosn with significant errors, omissions, or eligibility problems will note be rated. Applications in which the project design and activities are not relevant and appropriate to the purpose of the grant program will be ineligible. b. Agency staff will be available to offer technical assistance to reviewers. (e) The agency may use peer review panels to evaluate applications in competitive grant programs. (1) Peer reviewers may include professionals, citizens, community leaders, and agency and library staff to evaluate grant applications. Peer reviewers must have appropriate training or service on citizen boards in an oversight capacity and may not evaluate grant applications in which there is, or is a possible appearance of, a conflict of interest. (2) The agency staff will distribute selected applications to reviewers and will provide written instructions or training for peer reviewers. Reviewers must complete any training prior to reviewing applications. (3) The reviewers will score each application according to the review criteria and requirements stated in the grant guidelines. (4) Each evaluation of an application for competitive grants shall be appropriately documented by the peer reviewer conducting the evaluation. The documentation shall include the scores assigned by the peer reviewer. The peer reviewer may also include comments that may be shared with the applicant. (f) Applications will be scored using the following process: (1) The peer reviewers will review all complete and eligible grant applications forwarded to them by agency staff and complete a rating form for each. Each reviewer will evaluate the proposal in relation to the specific requirements of the criteria and will assign a value, depending on the points assigned to each criterion. (2) No reviewer who is associated with an applicant or who stands to benefit directly from an application will serve on the review panel for the grant program in which the application is submitted for that grant cycle. Any reviewer who is associated with a potential applicant in the respective category must inform the agency and their organization about a potential conflict of interest. Any reviewer who feels unable to evaluate a particular application fairly may choose not to review that application. (3) Reviewers will consider and assess the strengths and weaknesses of any proposed project only on the basis of the documents submitted. Considerations of geographical distribution, demographics, type of library, or personality will not influence the assessment of a proposal by the review panel. The panel members must make their own individual decisions regarding the applications. The panel may discuss applications, but the panel's recommendations will be compiled from the individual assessments, not as the result of a collective decision or vote. (4) Reviewers may not discuss proposals with any applicant before the proposals are reviewed. Agency staff is available to provide technical assistance to reviewers. Agency staff will conduct all negotiations and communication with the applicants. (5) Reviewers may recommend setting conditions for funding a given application or group of applications (e.g., adjusting the project budget, revising project objectives, modifying the timetable, amending evaluation methodology, etc.). The recommendation must include a Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 10 of 17 statement of the reasons for setting such conditions. Reviewers who are ineligible to evaluate a given proposal will not participate in the discussion of funding conditions. (6) Reviewers will submit their evaluation forms to the agency. In order to be counted, the forms must arrive before the specified due date. Funding Decisions (13 TAC §2.114) (a) The agency staff will submit a recommended priority-ranked list of applicants for possible funding. Final approval of a grant award will be made by the commission in an open meeting. (b) Applications for grant funding will be evaluated only upon the information provided in the written application, including attachments, if any. (c) The agency staff may negotiate with selected applicants to determine the terms of the award. To receive an award, the applicant must accept any additional or special terms and conditions listed in the grant contract and any changes in the grant application. (d) The agency staff will notify unsuccessful applicants in writing. (e) The agency has the right to reject applications or cancel or modify a grant solicitation at any point before a contract is signed. The award of any grant is subject to the availability of funds. Grant Recommendation and Award Process (13 TAC §2.115) To be considered eligible for funding, any application must receive a minimum adjusted mean score of more than 60 percent of the maximum points available. However, eligibility does not guarantee funding. The commission may also choose to award extra points to libraries that have not received funding within a specified time frame to be determined by the agency or that have limited resources. To reduce the impact of scores that exceedingly high or low, or otherwise outside the range of scores from other reviewers, agency staff will tabulate the panel’s work using calculations such as an adjusted mean score. (1) Applications will be ranked in priority order by score for consideration by the commission. (2) If insufficient funds remain to fully fund the next application, the staff may negotiate a reduced grant with the next ranked applicant. (3) If the panel recommends funding an application that, for legal, fiscal, or other reason, is unacceptable to the staff, a contrary recommendation will be made. The applicant will be informed of this situation prior to presentation to the commission and may negotiate a revision to the application. A positive recommendation to the commission will be contingent upon successfully completing these negotiations prior to the commission meeting. If the panel is unable to produce a set of recommendations for funding, the agency staff will use the same evaluation procedures to develop recommendations to the commission. Multiple Applications (13 TAC §2.119) Applicants for competitive grants may submit more than one grant application in the same grant cycle only if: (1) the applications are for different projects in different grant programs and the applications are not the same, or nearly the same; or (2) the grant program has specified separate categories for application and the proposals submitted are not the same, or nearly the same, project. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 11 of 17 Scoring Rubric Project Scoring Total in Eight Areas: 100 points Relevance and appropriateness of the project design and activities to the goals and purpose of the Special Projects grant program will be considered in the scoring of all criteria. Members of the LSTA Grant Review Panel may score each criterion as follows: 0-1 points: Project does not meet the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. 2-3 points: Project partially meets the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. 4-5 points: Project is a clear fit for the goals and purposes of the Special Projects grant program. Abstract • Overview and summary of project • Concise (1,000 characters) • Includes: who, what, where, when, why, for whom 1. Needs Assessment (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 3; Final score = 15 max) • Applicant should describe why the program is needed, the program goals and audience. • They should describe the greater community to be served and include demographic statistics, library records, or surveys to support these statements. • They attach letters of cooperation showing commitment to the project from agencies to be involved. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Provides no evidence of need for program. • Program goals and audience are not defined. • Does not describe needs assessment process and/or how need was determined (i.e., no description of community served, demographic statistics, library records or evidence or surveys). • If partners are part of the Project, no letters of support are provided. • Provides partial/some evidence of need for program. • Program goals and audience are defined but show little to no connection to description of need. • Needs assessment process seems vague and incompletely describes how stated need was determined. • If partners are part of the Project, letters of support are provided. • Provides clear and convincing evidence of need for program and why they are best suited to meet this need. • Program goals and audience are clearly connected to description of need. • Clearly describes needs assessment process including how stated need was determined (e.g., statistics, records, surveys). • If partners are part of the Project, letters of support are provided that clearly define roles and responsibilities of partnering agencies. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 12 of 17 2. Program Design (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 4; Final score = 20 max) • Applicant thoroughly describes the services, programs, and activities; describe the location where they will be offered. • Explain how these services will attract shared library users. • Collaborative projects have priority and inclusion of relevant community organizations is encouraged. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Services, programs and activities lack definition and are unclear. Project appears to lack direction and planning and does not relate to described needs. • Does not describe location(s) where project will be offered or is vague. • Does not describe how project services will attract library users. • Issue of collaboration not addressed. • Services, programs and activities are defined. Project has direction and some relationship to described needs. • Location where services will be offered is described but does not clearly relate to project activities and described needs. • Describes how project services will attract library users. • Issue of collaboration addressed, even if not a collaborative project. • Services, programs and activities are clearly defined, including timelines and resources required. Project shows evidence of clear direction and planning and strong relationship to described needs. • Location where services will be offered is described and clearly relates to project activities and described needs. • Clearly describes how project services will attract library users and ties to project activities and described needs. • Collaborative project; collaboration clearly addressed and described in full. 3. Project Impact (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 3; Final score = 15 max) • Applicant describes the impact their project will have on library services and users locally as well as regionally or statewide. • This may include how the proposed project is a model project that would benefit other regions of the state. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not address any of the impacts the project may have on library services and library users. • Does not address larger issues that the project may address. • Describes impact of the project but doesn’t show an association with the library services and library users. • Addresses larger issues but does not tie these issues to local project. • Describes both impact and measurable benefits the project will have on library services and library users. • Addresses larger issues clearly and ties them to local project. 4. Personnel (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 1; Final score = 5 max) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 13 of 17 • Applicant identifies who will administer the funds and which positions will provide the services. • Applicant lists how much time will be spent in each position on assigned duties. • Applicant lists how the qualifications of each person relate to their job duties. Full job descriptions are required for new hires. Provide verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not identify fiscal agent and which positions will provide services. • No description of time spent in each position. on assigned duties • No description of qualifications of key personnel. • No job descriptions for new hires. • Fiscal agent identified without explanation and positions briefly described. • Time spent on project by each staff member briefly identified. • Some description of qualifications of key personnel. • Partial or seemingly incomplete job descriptions available for new hires. • Fiscal agent identified with full explanation and positions that will provide the services fully described. • Time spent on project by each staff member identified and justified. • Describes qualifications of key personnel in detail, including experience with similar projects, and how each will contribute to the project’s success. • Full job descriptions provided for new hires. 5. Timetable (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 1; Final score = 5 max) • Applicants presents a timetable for project activities within the fiscal year (i.e., a list of actions with a date by which they will be accomplished). • Applicant provides verification that facilities will be available, equipment and materials delivered. • Applicants explain how staff will be hired and trained in time to carry out the services as planned. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Timetable is missing or incomplete (i.e., does not include a list of actions with specific target dates for completion). • No verification regarding facilities, equipment and/or materials. • No explanation of hiring or training of staff to carry out project in project period. • Timetable exists but is not clearly relevant to achieving the project goals. • Timetable seems unachievable within the project period. • Some verification regarding facilities, equipment and/or materials, but not clearly related to project. • Brief or incomplete explanation of hiring or training of staff to carry out project in project period. • No time given for staff to be hired, if applicable. • Timetable includes a list of actions with specific target dates and is clearly relevant to achieving the established objectives. • Timetable seems achievable within the project period. • Use of facilities, equipment and/or materials fully explained and relevant to project and project goals. • Full explanation of hiring or training of staff that will allow project to be carried out during the project period. • Realistic timeline given for hiring of new staff, if applicable. 6. Evaluation (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 2; Final score = 10 max) Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 14 of 17 • Applicants set achievable, measurable outcomes, and present a reasonable method to collect data. • Applicants present a method to count users of the services as well as measure the effectiveness of the services using IMLS tools and LBB measures. Note: Some projects will not lend themselves to outcomes-based evaluation (OBE). TSLAC strongly encourages the use of OBE, we do not require it for proposals, and points should not be deducted from strong evaluation plans that use outputs instead of outcomes when it is reasonable not to employ OBE. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Does not include either project outputs or outcomes. • No method to collect data provided. • No method to count users of services or measure effectiveness of services. • Will not determine success of the project. • Provides project outputs and/or outcomes but do not clearly relate to project. • Method to collect data provided. • Method to count users of services provided, but not to measure effectiveness of services. • Provides some indication of the success of the project. • Clearly describes appropriate project outputs and/or outcomes. • Method to collect data is provided that clearly relates to project services and documented need. • Method to count users of services and measure effectiveness of services provided. • Will effectively determine success of the project and its impact. • Project evaluation can be used as model for other similar projects. • Project evaluation incorporates “best practices” from other similar projects. 7. Budget (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 4; Final score = 20 max) • Applicants provide a complete budget for the proposed project. • Applicant fully justifies the budget by describing how budgeted items will contribute to the project and identifies a source for the stated costs (e.g., city pay classification for staff, catalog or city/county bid list for equipment). • The costs are reasonable to achieve project objectives. • If new staff members are to be hired, applicants consider the time for a realistic hiring process to occur. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Budget table is incomplete. • Provides no narrative description (justification), beyond the budget column, of how funds will be spent. • Budget table is complete. • Budget narrative description exists but does not clearly relate to the project and sources for costs are not stated. • Budget table is complete and clearly describes how the dollars will be used for the project. • Clearly identifies source of stated costs and justification for their reasonableness. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 15 of 17 • Items listed in the budget description do not match those in the budget form. • Costs do not seem reasonable, and description is unclear. • Items listed in the budget description match those in the budget form. 8. Sustainability (Points: Raw score = 5 max, weight = 2; Final score = 10 max) • Applicants describe the resources that will be used to support and sustain the services developed through the grant in the future. • A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is desirable, but not required. 0-1 points 2-3 points 4-5 points • Description of resources used to support and sustain the project after grant completion is vague and unspecific. • Some evidence of future support and sustainability described. • Clear evidence of sustainability described. • A written commitment of future support from governing bodies is provided, if applicable. 9. Extra Points – Up to 10 Extra Points 5 points: Awarded if applicant library serves a community with a population of 30,000 or less. 5 points: Awarded if applicant library has not received a TSLAC grant in the past 5 years. F. Award Administration Information Notice of Award Applicants will be notified of the grant review panel’s recommendations via e-mail. The notification will include the applicant rankings, panel recommendation, panel comments and scores relevant to respective applications, and protest procedures, which are also included in this notice. The panel recommendations will be submitted to the Texas State Library and Archives Commission at its August meeting for consideration and approval. Once the awards have been approved, successful applicants will receive instructions on how to proceed and mandatory training required for all TSLAC competitive grant recipients. Protest Procedure — Texas State Library and Archives Commission, 13 TAC §2.55 (a) An aggrieved person who is not satisfied with a decision, procedure, or service received from the staff of the Texas State Library and Archives Commission or who is an actual or prospective bidder, grantee, or contractor aggrieved in connection with a solicitation, evaluation, or award may file a protest with the Director and Librarian in accordance with this rule. (b) A protest must be submitted to the Director and Librarian within 21 days after the person knows or should have known of the matter which is protested. The Director and Librarian has the discretion to allow a protest filed after 21 days if the protestant shows good cause for the late filing or if the protest raises an issue significant to the general policies and procedures of the commission. Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 16 of 17 (c) The protestant shall mail or deliver a copy of the protest to all interested persons. The Director and Librarian will furnish a list of interested persons to a protestant. For protests of a competitive selection (bid, contract, or grant), interested persons shall include all persons who have submitted a bid, proposal, or application. (d) A protest must be in writing and identified as a protest under this section, and contain the following: (1) A description of the protestant's interest in the matter (2) The issue(s) to be resolved and remedy(s) requested (3) The protestant's argument supporting the protest, including a statement of relevant facts and applicable law, specifying the statutes, rules, or other legal authority alleged to have been violated (4) The protestant's affirmation that facts set forth in the protest are true (5) A certification that a copy of the protest has been mailed or delivered to all interested persons (e) Upon receipt of a protest conforming to the requirements of this section, the commission shall not proceed with the solicitation, award, or contract until the protest is resolved, unless the Director and Librarian makes a written determination that delay would harm the substantial interests of the state. (f) The Director and Librarian has the authority to decide, settle, or resolve the protest and will make a written determination. The Director and Librarian may solicit written responses to the protest from other parties. The Director and Librarian shall inform the protesting party and other interested parties by letter of his determination, and how to appeal the determination to the commission. (g) An interested party may appeal the determination of the Director and Librarian. An appeal must be in writing and conform to paragraphs (1) - (3) of this subsection: (1) The appeal must be received in the office of the Director and Librarian no later than 15 days after the date the determination is mailed to interested parties; (2) A copy of the appeal must be mailed or delivered by the appealing party to all interested parties and contain a certification of mailing or delivery; (3) The appealing party must state whether or not an opportunity is requested to make an oral presentation to the commission in open meeting. (h) The Director and Librarian shall refer the matter to the commission for their consideration at an open meeting. (i) The chair of the commission has the discretion to allow an appeal filed more than 15 days after the Director and Librarian's determination if the appealing party shows good cause for the late filing or if the appeal raises an issue significant to the general policies or procedures of the commission. (j) An interested party may file a response to an appeal of the determination of the Director and Librarian no later than seven days after the appeal is mailed or delivered. (k) Copies of the appeal and responses of interested parties, if any, shall be mailed to the commission by the Director and Librarian. (l) The chair of the commission has the discretion to decide whether or not a request for oral presentations will be granted and will set the order and amount of time for oral presentations that are allowed. The chair also has the discretion to decide whether presentations and written documents presented by Commission staff and interested parties will be allowed. (m) The commission will determine properly filed appeals and make its decision in open meeting. The commission shall vote to uphold or reverse the decision of the Director and Librarian. Failing a majority vote of a quorum of the commission, the Director and Librarian’s decision is upheld. The Special Projects Grant Program Guidelines — SFY 2026 • Application Due Date: Monday, February 10, 2025 Page 17 of 17 commission's decision is final and not subject to judicial review under the statutes governing the commission. (n) A decision issued either by the commission in open meeting or in writing by the Director and Librarian shall be the final administrative action of the commission. (o) Documentation concerning a protest of a competitive selection is part of the commission's records series for that selection and is retained in accordance with the commission's approved records retention schedule. Policy Requirements TSLAC competitive grant recipients are subject to the Texas Grant Management Standards (TxGMS) (https://comptroller.texas.gov/purchasing/docs/grant-management-reader.pdf) and federal Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (also known as the Uniform Guidance) (https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title- 2/subtitle-A/chapter-II/part-200). Reporting Grantees must submit financial and performance reports at scheduled intervals throughout the reporting period as will be outlined in the grant contract. Reports will be submitted electronically through TSLAC’s Grant Management System (GMS). G. Contacts TSLAC staff members are available during regular business hours (8 a.m.-5 p.m., Central) to assist with competitive grants. Dominic Gonzales, Grants Administrator Phone: 512-463-5581 Fax: 512-936-2306 E-mail: grants@tsl.texas.gov Taylor Gardner, Grants Coordinator Phone: 512-463-5468 Fax: 512-936-2306 E-mail: grants@tsl.texas.gov State Fiscal Year FY 2026 Grant Program * Special Projects 75 2026 Project Title * Schertz Public Library Outreach Vehicle Application Number 3100 Organization Name Schertz Public Library 798 Schertz Pkwy Schertz TX 78154-1954 Project Manager * Melissa Uhlhorn muhlhorn@schertz.com Phone Number: Email: Legal Entity City of Schertz 798 Schertz Pkwy Schertz TX 78154-1954 EIN: Federal Unique Entity ID: SAM Exp. Date: WP19CJPW5PK5 210-619-1701 44 25 15 Modified On 1/23/2025 7:18 PM State House District: State Senate District: US Congress District: I certify, to the best of my knowledge, that the statements made in this application are true, that the information provided is correct, and that I am authorized to enter into legally binding commitments on behalf of the applicant organization. Application Approved by (name):        ________________________________________________________________ Job Title:  ________________________________________________________________ Date:  ________________________________________________________________ Signature:  ________________________________________________________________ Agenda No. 5.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Purchasing & Asset Management Subject: Resolution 25-R-013 - Granting signature authority to the City Manager to enter into and sign certain contracts and documents on behalf of the City (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez/J.Kurz) BACKGROUND There appears to be some ambiguity as it relates to signature authority in the City Charter. Section 4.05 of the City Charter states that unless another signatory is otherwise designated by the City Council, the Mayor will sign all official documents such as ordinances, resolutions, conveyances, grant agreements, contracts, and bonds. Section 5.03(k) of the Charter grants the City Manager the authority to sign documents in the name of the City as authorized by the City Council. While most agenda items have explicit language authorizing the City Manager to execute an agreement once approved by Council, this will provide authority in the event that specific language is not included in the resolution. Additionally, this Council action (resolution) simply seeks to clearly delineate and delegate signature authority. As proposed, the Mayor would continue to sign all ordinances, resolutions, bonds and other documents which they are legally obligated to sign. The City Manager would have signature authority to execute all contracts approved by City Council, as well as, any other type of document or contract provided that the funding for the contract is contained in an approved budget and subject to the monetary limits already established (i.e. procurement contracts less than $50,000, revenue-generating agreements, association agreements, etc.). This is not a change to current process or procedures; it simply formalizes signatory authority of the City Manager and eliminates any ambiguity. The City Attorney reviewed the resolution and did not identify any potential issues or conflicts. GOAL Formalize signatory authority of the City Manager COMMUNITY BENEFIT Section 5.03(b) of the Charter grants the City Manager the authority to direct and supervise the administration of all departments, offices and agencies of the City, except as otherwise provided by the Charter or by law. This formal designation of signatory authority will allow the City Manager to effectively conduct City business without undue delay. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 25-R-013 RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 25-R-013 Approval of Resolution 25-R-013 Attachments Resolution 25-R-013  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-013 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS GRANTING SIGNATURE AUTHORITY TO THE CITY MANAGER TO ENTER INTO AND SIGN CERTAIN CONTRACTS AND DOCUMENTS ON BEHALF OF THE CITY AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, Section 4.05 of the City of Schertz Charter (“Charter”) states that unless another signatory is otherwise designated by the City Council, the Mayor will sign all official documents such as ordinances, resolutions, conveyances, grant agreements, contracts, and bonds; and WHEREAS, Section 5.03(b) of the Charter grants the City Manager the authority to direct and supervise the administration of all departments, offices and agencies of the City, except as otherwise provided by the Charter or by law; and WHEREAS, Section 5.03(k) of the Charter grants the City Manager the authority to sign documents in the name of the City as authorized by the City Council; and WHEREAS, Texas Local Government Code § 252.021 allows Council to delegate contracting authority and the City Manager has general authority to contract for expenditure without further approval of the Council for all budgeted items not exceeding limits set by the Council; and WHEREAS, the City enters into many contracts, agreements, and similar documents that are routine in nature or are for certain categories or types of items that have already been approved through the budgeting process, and the City Manager (or designee) should be authorized to negotiate and execute, in accordance with the guidelines established herein, in the interest of efficiency of administrative governmental operations in the City; and WHEREAS, the Mayor shall continue to sign the City Council ordinances, resolutions, bonds, and documents which they are obligated by state law to sign; NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby grants authority to the City Manager to sign on behalf of the City of Schertz all lawful acts of the Council, as approved, other than the ordinances, resolutions and bonds of the Council, as permitted by law. This authority includes the approval of all procurement documents that require Council action and executing all contracts and agreements approved by Council. Subject to compliance with any state law that requires approval by Council, the City Manager is authorized to initiate and approve any purchase approved in the annual budget. Section 2. The Council grants expenditure authority to the City Manager (or designee) to execute transactions, purchase orders, contracts and similar documents in connection with the making and awarding of contracts for the acquisition of goods and services in an amount not to exceed $50,000 and change orders not greater than either the lesser of $50,000 or 25% of the original contract. Section 3. The authority granted to the City Manager herein with respect to signing or entering into any contracts shall also include the authority to terminate such contracts as permitted under the contract and to sign amendments to such contracts when the amount of the amendment when added to the original amount of the contract does not exceed $50,000 or when the amount of the amendment does not exceed 25% of the original amount of the contract, whichever amount is less. Section 4. The Council hereby grants signature authority to the City Manager to sign any other type of document and bind the City for those contracts, provided that the funding for the contract is contained in an approved budget and subject to the monetary limits set forth in Section 3 above. These types of documents include, but are not limited to, revenue-generating agreements, association agreements, conveyances, and grant agreements. Section 5. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 6. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 7. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 8. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 9. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 10. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this _________ day of ______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Ralph Gutierrez ATTEST: City Secretary, Sheila Edmondson (CITY SEAL) Agenda No. 6.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Executive Team Subject:Resolution 25-R-020 - Authorizing a pro-rata agreement for the Saddlebrook Development (S.Williams/B.James) BACKGROUND Jen Texas 32, LLC (Ashton Woods) is the developer of the Saddlebrook Residential Development located on the north side of Lower Seguin Road approximately 4,800 feet east of FM 1518. The developer is seeking approval of an amended pro-rata agreement for the sewer lift station and associated force main (the Saddlebrook Lift Station) with the City. The City Council initially authorized the entering into of a pro-rata agreement, along with other agreements, on April 16, 2024 by Resolution 24-R-40. Since that time, the excess capacity in the Saddlebrook lift station has increased substantially as a result of it being able to connect into the OJR Sewer Plant without having to account for all of the flows from the Croton Lift Station. It had previously been understood that CCMA, the operator of the OJR Sewer Plant, would only allow one lift station force main connection, which would have required the rerouting of the flows from the existing Croton Lift Station into the Saddlebrook Lift Station in order for the Saddlebrook Lift Station force main connection to replace the Croton Lift Station force main connection. As a result, there will now be approximately 2,000 excess Equivalent Development Units (EDUs ) of capacity instead of 725. City Staff is restructuring the agreement to be a more typical agreement, but the City is proposing to pay to reserve 360 EDUs of capacity to allow flexibility for existing rights of capacity into the Croton Lift Station, allocate 250 EDUs of capacity to the Rumpf/ Brady Tract based on the Development Agreement, allocate 127 EDUs to Carmel Ranch, allocate 420 EDUs to the Judah Ranch (Bauman tract) and the rest on a first come first served basis.  GOAL Provide for the orderly development of infrastructure within the City of Schertz.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT Provide for development of infrastructure in a timely, cost-effective manner. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 25-R-020 authorizing the City Manager to enter into a Pro-Rata Agreement for the lift station with Jen Texas 32, LLC. FISCAL IMPACT The City would have to pay the developer $688,791.60 within 90 days of execution of this The City would have to pay the developer $688,791.60 within 90 days of execution of this agreement/acceptance of the lift station for the 360 EDUs of capacity. This is down from the $1,387,149.75 in the previously approved agreement. These funds would come from the Water & Sewer Reserve Fund.  RECOMMENDATION Approval or Resolution 25-R-020. Attachments Resolution 25-R-020 with attachment  Agenda No. 7.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Police Department Subject: Resolution 25-R-014 - Authorizing the Schertz Police Department to accept equipment from the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG) RECONYX Illegal Dumping Cameras Program (J. Lowery) BACKGROUND The Environmental Conservation Program from AACOG contacted local government agencies to announce the opportunity to apply for grant-funded RECONYX cameras.  These cameras provide cellular-enabled surveillance of specific sites prone to illegal dumping.  The purpose is to allow successful identification of subjects dumping items in places and to allow for investigation and eventual successful prosecution or citation.  The goal of the program is to ensure the continued beauty, safety, and health of our communities.  GOAL The goal of this resolution is to formally accept two RECONYX cameras as part of the AACOG Environmental Protection Program to combat illegal dumping.  The Schertz Police Department will work with city departments to use these cameras to identify suspects and/or suspect vehicles for investigation and prosecution.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT The community will benefit from this program due to active investigation of dumping sites.  This will ensure continued beautification of public areas.  SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION The Schertz Police Department recommends approval of this resolution. RECOMMENDATION The Schertz Police Department recommends approval of this resolution. Attachments Accouncement Flyer  Resolution 25-R-014  Submitted Application for Program  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-014 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING THE SCHERTZ POLICE DEPARTMENT TO ACCEPT EQUIPMENT FROM THE ALAMO AREA COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS RECONYX ILLEGAL DUMPING CAMERA PROGRAM WHEREAS, The Schertz City Council finds it in the best interest of the citizens of the City of Schertz that the City of Schertz, and the Schertz Police Department by extension, accept two RECONYX cameras to assist with illegal dumping operations. WHEREAS, this equipment will assist in the investigation of illegal dumping sites and ensure the City of Schertz uses these tools to ensure the environment is protected. WHEREAS, the approval covers two locations within the City of Schertz- the area of Pecan Grove Trailer Park and 100 FM 78. Additional locations can be authorized with justification. WHEREAS, the Schertz City Council is informed that there is no matching funds required for said project. The Schertz Police Department will still be required to cover any maintenance costs during the program operation. These costs are not determined at this time. WHEREAS, the Schertz City Council agrees that in the event of loss or misuse of the Office of the Governor funds, the Schertz City Council assures that the cameras will be returned to the Alamo Area Council of Governments (AACOG). WHEREAS, the Schertz City Council designates the City Manager as the grantees’s authorized official. The authorized official is given the power to apply for, accept, reject, alter, or terminate the grant on behalf of the applicant agency. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1.The City Council hereby approves the acceptance of the AACOG RECONYX cameras and designates Steve Williams, Schertz City Manager, as the Authorized Official to accept, decline, modify, or cancel the program application. Section 2.James Lowery, Schertz Police Chief, is designated as the Program Director. There are no financial reports due, so no Financial Official is named. Quarterly operational reports will be submitted by the Schertz Police Department. Section 3.The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 4.All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 5.This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 6.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 7.It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 8.This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this _________ day of ______________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Mayor, Ralph Gutierrez ATTEST: City Secretary, Sheila Edmondson (CITY SEAL) Agenda No. 8.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject:Resolution 25-R-002 – Authorizing a professional services agreement with Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. for the design of the Boenig Drive Reconstruction Project (B. James/K. Woodlee/J. Nowak) BACKGROUND Boenig Drive started out as a County Road and later became part of the City of Schertz.  The pavement section does not meet the current minimum standards for a City street.  While the original pavement section served the community well for many years, as residential development occurred in the vicinity of the street, the pavement section began to deteriorate rapidly.  The existing pavement section is not adequate to support the current traffic on the street.  Additionally, the street is relatively narrow and should be widened slightly to provide for minimum driving lane widths. Staff identified the need to improve Boenig some time ago, but funding was not available for the proposed improvements.  Originally, Staff estimated, based on historical knowledge/recollection of the existing pavement section that the existing pavement section could be "salvaged" and the street "rehabilitated" with some minor widening.  Until funding for a comprehensive improvement project could be secured, Public Works has performed various repairs to the street to keep it in serviceable condition.  Previously, the City had geotechnical sampling done on Boenig and several other streets in the City to verify the current pavement sections and determine an appropriate course of action to improve them.  The results of this analysis indicated that the existing section was less substantial than assumed and the street would need to be fully reconstructed. In developing the scope of work for the project, Staff also noted that the current intersection of Boenig with Ware Seguin Road is less than ideal.  This intersection is immediately adjacent to the Hallie Heights and Ware Seguin Road intersection and is located in a curve in Ware Seguin Rd.  Since the street needed to be fully reconstructed, it would also be prudent to look at improving these intersections to make things function more efficiently and safely.  The project scope includes analyzing these two intersections and reconstructing them to create a new, single intersection with Ware Seguin Rd.  This project is included in the approved CIP and funding is available for it in this fiscal year. With funding now available, Staff contacted one of the City's on-call Engineering Firms, Unintech, and requested they provide a scope and fee to design and create the bid package for this project.  Staff has reviewed the scope and fee proposal for the project and has determined it is appropriate for the design and bid package development for the project.  Staff recommends City Council authorize the City Manager to execute the attached Task Order for the design and bid package creation for the project. GOAL Have Council Authorize the City Manager to execute a Task Order for Unintech for design and bid Have Council Authorize the City Manager to execute a Task Order for Unintech for design and bid package for the Boenig Drive Reconstruction project. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Reconstruction of the Boenig from Ware Seguin Road to Graytown Road will provide a wider, stronger pavement section.  The stronger pavement section will be sufficient to handle the traffic on the street.  The new street will be smoother and provide for better vehicle travel down the street.  The Public Works Department will not need to perform additional, multiple repairs as they have had to on the existing section to keep the street "serviceable" to residents.  Overall, access to the residential subdivisions along this section of Boenig Drive will be improved.  Modifying the intersections of Hallei Heights and Boenig into a single intersection will provide for safer, more efficient access to Ware Seguin Road. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of the Task Order with Unintech Consulting Engineers for $267,312.00 and a not to exceed amount of $290,00.00 for the Boenig Drive Reconstruction project. FISCAL IMPACT Funding for the Task Order is available from Bond proceeds earmarked for streets.  In the approved CIP, there is $1,600,000.00 of Bond proceeds allocated to this project.  The recommended not to exceed design cost of $290,000.00 leaves $1,310,000.00 for construction.  The preliminary construction estimate provided by Unintech with their scope and fee proposal is about $2,951,000.00.  This indicates we will likely need more funding for construction of the project.  The large difference between what Staff estimated and Unitech's estimate is likely due to increased construction costs from when Staff's estimate was created and differences in construction scope between what Staff Assumed and Unintech assumed.  During the design process, any differences in construction scope will be resolved and more accurate construction cost estimates will be created.  As part of the normal CIP review and update process, Staff will identify if additional funding can be allocated to this project for construction due to other projects being delayed or construction of this project needs to be delayed in order to secure additional funding for it. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 25-R-002. Attachments CIP Project List Boenig  Resolution 25-R-002  Boenig OPCC  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-002 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING EXPEDITURES WITH UNINTECH CONSULTING ENGINEERS INC., TOTALING NO MORE THAN $290,000, FOR PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING-RELATED SERVICES ON THE BOENIG DRIVE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT, AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH WHEREAS, the City staff of the City of Schertz (the “City”) has determined that the City requires professional services relating to engineering and design for the Boenig Drive Reconstruction Project; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. is uniquely qualified to provide such services for the City; and WHEREAS, Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. is an approved On-Call Engineering Firm for the City of Schertz; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 252.022(a)(4), the City is not required to seek bids or proposals with respect to a procurement for personal, professional, or planning purposes; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to contract with Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. pursuant to the On-Call Task Order Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit A (the “Agreement”) up to a maximum total aggregate amount of $290,000. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes the City Manager to execute and deliver the Task Order Agreement with Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. in accordance with their approved Master Agreement in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A in the amount of $267,312 and authorize the City Manager to execute and deliver the Task Order in a not to exceed total aggregate amount of $290,000. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. 50077397.1 Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this day of , 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 50077397.1 A-1 EXHIBIT A TASK ORDER NO. 001 SERVICES AGREEMENT EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. This document has important legal consequences; consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its use or modification. This document should be adapted to the particular circumstances of the specific Agreement between Owner and Engineer, and the controlling Laws and Regulations. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition, is published in four parts: (1) the Main Agreement (general provisions governing all Task Orders); (2) the Exhibits to Main Agreement; (3) the Task Order Form (see below); and (4) the Exhibits to Task Order. The Main Agreement contains a Guidelines for Use section that pertains to all four parts of E-505. AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES— TASK ORDER EDITION PART 3 OF 4: TASK ORDER FORM Prepared by Copyright© 2020 EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. National Society of Professional Engineers 1420 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-2794 (703) 684-2882 www.nspe.org American Council of Engineering Companies 1015 15th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20005 (202) 347-7474 www.acec.org American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400 (800) 548-2723 www.asce.org The copyright for this EJCDC document is owned jointly by the three sponsoring organizations listed above. The National Society of Professional Engineers is the Copyright Administrator for the EJCDC documents; please direct all inquiries regarding EJCDC copyrights to NSPE. The use of this document is governed by the terms of the License Agreement for the 2020 EJCDC® Engineering Series Documents. NOTE: EJCDC publications may be purchased at www.ejcdc.org, or from any of the sponsoring organizations above. Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 6 TASK ORDER NO. 001 In accordance with Paragraph 1.01, Main Agreement, of the Agreement Between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition dated , Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. TASK ORDER DATA a.Effective Date of Task Order: b.Owner:City of Schertz c.Engineer:Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. d.Specific Project (title) Boenig Drive Reconstruction e.Specific Project (description): Civil and Survey Engineering design services for the reconstruction of Boenig Drive from Ware Seguin Road to North Graytown Rd f. Related Task Orders Supplemented by this Task Order: Superseded by this Task Order: 2. BASELINE INFORMATION Baseline Information. Owner has furnished the following Specific Project information to Engineer as of the Effective Date of the Task Order. Engineer's scope of services has been developed based on this information. As the Specific Project moves forward, some of the information may change or be refined, and additional information will become known, resulting in the possible need to change, refine, or supplement the scope of services. Specific Project Title:Boenig Drive Reconstruction Type and Size of Facility:Local Type A Class Road – approximately 5100 LF Description of Improvements:Reconstruct the street with a new residential street section. Re- grade the barrow ditches to help things drain better and replace the This is Task Order No. 001, consisting of 6 pages. Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 6 concrete low water crossing with culverts. Modify the intersection at Ware-Seguin Rd. by combining the two streets so there is only one intersection; re-aligning Boenig. Expected Construction Start:July 2025 Prior Studies, Reports, Plans:Geotechnical Engineering Report by Terracon, dated 4-15-2022 Facility Location(s):City of Schertz. From Ware Seguin Road to North Graytown Road Current Specific Project Budget:$2,952,000.00 Funding Sources:CIP Known Design Standards:City of Schertz Public Works Design Guide, AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures 1993 Edition Known Specific Project Limitations: Boenig Drive from Ware Seguin Road to North Graytown Road. Specific Project Assumptions:Residential street to be a local street with 30-foot pavement width, new curbs, and with new sidewalk on east side of road to connect from Hallie Heights to the existing sidewalk along Boenig and continue existing sidewalk down to N Graytown. Wheelchair ramps to be installed at each intersection. The existing low water crossing from the Willow View subdivision in Converse to the Reserve at Schertz II is to be replaced with a multi box culvert crossing. Realign intersection of Ware Seguin Road to connect Boeing with Hallie Heights. This will require some right of way acquisition. Other Pertinent Information:Project is not in the Edwards Aquifer Regulated Zones, is not within an area known for environmentally sensitive features, is not located within a FEMA designated flood hazard area. Existing 8” waterline to remain; no anticipated improvements. Existing sanitary sewer crosses Boenig near the existing low water crossing; no anticipated improvements. A geotechnical sampling and report will be required. 3. SERVICES OF ENGINEER (“SCOPE”) A. The specific Basic Services to be provided or furnished by Engineer under this Task Order are: Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 3 of 6 Exhibit A to Task Order, “Engineer's Services for Task Order,” as attached to this specific Task Order. B. All the services included above comprise Basic Services for purposes of Engineer's compensation under this Task Order, with the exception of Resident Project Representative Services, if any, which are compensated separately. C. Resident Project Representative (RPR) Services: 1. If the Scope established in Paragraph 2.A above includes RPR services, then Exhibit D to Task Order is expressly incorporated in this Task Order by reference. D. Additional Services: Services not expressly set forth as Basic Services in Paragraph 3.A above, and necessary services listed as not requiring Owner's written authorization, or requiring additional effort in an immediate, expeditious, or accelerated manner as a result of unanticipated construction events or Specific Project conditions, are Additional Services, and will be compensated by the method indicated for Additional Services in this Task Order. All other Additional Services require mutual agreement and may be authorized by amending the Task Order as set forth in Paragraph 8.05.B.2 of the Main Agreement, with compensation for such other Additional Services as set forth in the amending instrument. 4. DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE A. In submitting required Documents and taking other related actions, Engineer and Owner will comply with Exhibit B to Task Order, attached to this specific Task Order. 5. ADDITIONS TO OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in Article 2 of the Main Agreement, and the following supplemental responsibilities that are specific to this Task Order: 1.Deliver and obtain Right of Entry to property owners within the limits of the project, but outside of existing right of way, that require access for the engineer or subconsultants. 2.Provide easement and right of way acquisition negotiation. 6. TASK ORDER SCHEDULE A. In addition to any schedule provisions provided in Exhibit B or elsewhere, the parties shall meet the following schedule: Not Applicable Date Action / Milestone Comment 7. ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION A. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Main Agreement. Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 6 B. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered under this Task Order as follows: Description of Service Amount Basis of Compensation 1. Basic Services a. Preliminary Design Phase $119,654.00 LUMP SUM b. Final Design Phase $96,595.00 LUMP SUM c. Bid Phase $7,731.00 LUMP SUM d. Construction $17,726.00 LUMP SUM e. Closeout $2,406.00 LUMP SUM 2. Resident Project Representative Services*N/A N/A TOTAL COMPENSATION (items 1 and 2)$244,112.00 3. Additional Services under Section 3.D above $23,200.00 ROW Exhibit and Field Notes (max 2)$4,600.00 LUMP SUM Platting Services $7,500.00 LUMP SUM SUE Level A Locates (6.1-10 ft) (Estimated 1 @$3,100/ea) $3,100.00 LUMP SUM SUE Level B (lump sum) (Estimated 300 feet)$8,000.00 LUMP SUM *Based on an 8-month continuous construction period. C. Compensation items and totals based in whole or in part on Hourly Rates or Direct Labor are estimates only. Lump sum amounts and estimated totals included in the breakdown by phases incorporate Engineer's labor, overhead, profit, reimbursable expenses (if any), and Subconsultants' charges, if any. For lump sum items, Engineer may alter the distribution of compensation between individual phases (line items) to be consistent with services actually rendered but shall not exceed the total lump sum compensation amount unless approved in writing by the Owner. Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 6 8. ENGINEER'S PRIMARY SUBCONSULTANTS FOR TASK ORDER, AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE TASK ORDER: A.Underground Services, Inc (SoftDIG) 9. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS: A. Exhibit A to Task Order—Engineer's Services Under Task Order B. Exhibit B to Task Order—Task Order Deliverables Schedule C. Exhibit D to Task Order—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order D. Exhibit E to Task Order-EJCDC® C-626, Notice of Acceptability of Work (Form) E. Other: Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer makes it subject to the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement and its exhibits and appendices, which Main Agreement, exhibits, and appendices are incorporated by this reference. OWNER:ENGINEER: By:By: Print Name:Print Name:Mark B Hill Title:Title:Director and Shareholder Engineer's License or Firm's Certificate No. (if required): 94904 State of:Texas DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: Name:Name:Mark B Hill Title:Title:Director and Shareholder Address:Address:2431 E. Evans Rd San Antonio, Texas Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 6 of 6 E-Mail Address: E-Mail Address: mhill@unintech.com Phone:Phone:210-590-4777 Date:Date:1-9-2025 EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. This document has important legal consequences; consultation with an attorney is encouraged with respect to its use or modification. This document should be adapted to the particular circumstances of the specific Agreement between Owner and Engineer, and the controlling Laws and Regulations. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition, is published in four parts: (1) the Main Agreement (general provisions governing all Task Orders); (2) Exhibits to Main Agreement; (3) the Task Order Form; and (4) the Exhibits to Task Order (see below). The Main Agreement contains a Guidelines for Use section that pertains to all four parts of E-505. AGREEMENT BETWEEN OWNER AND ENGINEER FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES— TASK ORDER EDITION PART 4 OF 4: EXHIBITS TO TASK ORDER Prepared by EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers 1420 King Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-2794 (703) 684-2882 www.nspe.org American Council of Engineering Companies 1015 15th Street N.W., Washington, DC 20005 (202) 347-7474 www.acec.org American Society of Civil Engineers 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400 (800) 548-2723 www.asce.org The copyright for this EJCDC document is owned jointly by the three sponsoring organizations listed above. The National Society of Professional Engineers is the Copyright Administrator for the EJCDC documents; please direct all inquiries regarding EJCDC copyrights to NSPE. The use of this document is governed by the terms of the License Agreement for the 2020 EJCDC® Engineering Series Documents. NOTE: EJCDC publications may be purchased at www.ejcdc.org, or from any of the sponsoring organizations above. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. TOC Page 1 of 1 EXHIBITS TO TASK ORDER TABLE OF CONTENTS EXHIBIT A—ENGINEER’S SERVICES UNDER TASK ORDER EXHIBIT B—TASK ORDER DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE EXHIBIT C—RESERVED EXHIBIT D—DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE UNDER TASK ORDER EXHIBIT E—EJCDC® C-626, NOTICE OF ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK (FORM) EXHIBIT F—RESERVED EXHIBIT G—RESERVED EXHIBIT H—RESERVED EXHIBIT I—RESERVED Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 26 EXHIBIT A—ENGINEER’S SERVICES UNDER TASK ORDER Exhibit A Table of Contents Article 1— BASIC SERVICES...................................................................................................................................2 1.01 Management of Engineering Services.................................................................................................2 1.02 Study and Report Phase......................................................................................................................2 1.03 Preliminary Design Phase....................................................................................................................3 1.04 Final Design Phase...............................................................................................................................7 1.05 Bidding/Proposal Phase ....................................................................................................................12 1.06 Construction Phase ...........................................................................................................................13 1.07 Post-Construction Phase...................................................................................................................20 Article 2— ADDITIONAL SERVICES......................................................................................................................21 2.01 Additional Services Not Requiring Owner’s Written Authorization..................................................21 2.02 Additional Services Requiring Owner’s Written Authorization.........................................................22 1. Article 1 of the Main Agreement, Services of Engineer, is supplemented to include the following provisions: Engineer shall provide Basic and Additional Services as set forth below. ARTICLE 1—BASIC SERVICES 1.01 Management of Engineering Services A. See Main Agreement, Paragraph 1.03. 1.02 Study and Report Phase A. Engineer shall: 1. Consult with Owner to define and clarify Owner’s requirements for the Specific Project, including design objectives and constraints, space, capacity and performance requirements, flexibility, and expandability, and any budgetary limitations, and identify available data, information, reports, facilities plans, and site evaluations. a. If Owner has already identified one or more potential solutions to meet its Specific Project requirements, then proceed with the study and evaluation of the Owner- identified potential solutions listed here: 1)[List the specific potential solutions to be studied and evaluated here]. b. If Owner has not identified specific potential solutions for study and evaluation, then assist Owner in determining whether Owner’s requirements, and available data, reports, plans, and evaluations, point to a single potential solution for Engineer’s study and evaluation, or are such that it will be necessary for Engineer to identify, study, and evaluate multiple potential solutions. c. If it is necessary for Engineer to identify, study, and evaluate multiple potential solutions, then identify [insert specific number] alternative solutions potentially Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 26 available to Owner, unless Owner and Engineer mutually agree that some other specific number of alternatives should be identified, studied, and evaluated. 2. Identify potential solution(s) to meet Owner’s Specific Project requirements, as needed. 3. Study and evaluate the potential solution(s) to meet Owner’s Specific Project requirements. 4. Visit the Site, or potential Specific Project sites, to review existing conditions and facilities, unless such visits are not necessary or applicable to meeting the objectives of the Study and Report Phase. 5. Assess initially available Specific Project information and data, including the Baseline Information set forth at the beginning of this Exhibit A. 6. Advise Owner of any need for Owner to obtain, furnish, or otherwise make available to Engineer additional Specific Project-related information and data, for Engineer’s use in the study and evaluation of potential solution(s) to Owner’s Specific Project requirements, and preparation of a related report. 7. After consultation with Owner, recommend the solution(s) which in Engineer’s judgment meet Owner’s requirements for the Specific Project. 8. Identify, consult with, and analyze requirements of authorities having jurisdiction to permit or approve construction or operation of the portions of the Specific Project to be designed or specified by Engineer, including but not limited to impacts and mitigating measures identified in previously prepared environmental assessments for the Specific Project provided to the Engineer or being concurrently prepared for Owner by others. 9. Advise the Owner of any need for Owner to provide data or services of the types described in Article 2 of the Agreement, for use in Specific Project design, or in preparation for Contractor selection and construction. 10. Assist Owner in evaluating the possible use of building information modeling; civil integrated management; geotechnical baselining of subsurface conditions at the Site; innovative design, contracting, or procurement strategies; project delivery method; or other strategies, technologies, or techniques for assisting in the design, construction, and operation of Owner’s facilities. The subject matter of this paragraph will be referred to in Exhibit A as “Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, and Techniques.” 11. Assist Owner in identifying opportunities for enhancing the sustainability of the Specific Project, and pursuant to Owner’s instructions, plan for the inclusion of sustainable features in the design. 12. Review with Owner the thresholds established in applicable codes, standards, and design criteria specifically governing the ability of the proposed facilities or improvements to perform, and to absorb or avoid damage without suffering complete or substantial failure. As part of the review, identify additional risk assessment studies or tools that are available to evaluate the susceptibility of the facilities or improvements to natural and man-made events beyond the applicable established thresholds. Upon Owner request, as an additional service, perform additional risk assessment studies or tools to further evaluate system resiliency beyond the applicable established thresholds. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 3 of 26 13. Utilities, including Underground Facilities a. Review any utility mapping and surveys and other utilities documentation made available by Owner. Take note of observable utilities during Site visit. b. Identify, in a preliminary manner and to the extent determinable by such mapping or other information provided by Owner, and by observations at the Site, those utilities (whether above-ground utilities of any type, or Underground Facilities) likely to be affected by the Specific Project construction and additional utility facilities or extensions that will be needed to serve the Specific Project. c. If the impact on existing utilities or the need for additional utility facilities or extensions cannot reasonably be determined in a preliminary manner from mapping or other information provided by Owner, or such information was not available from Owner, then assist Owner in evaluating the need to either obtain additional utility mapping and utility documentation during the Study and Report Phase, or undertake other alternative approaches and contingencies to account for utility uncertainties in this phase. d. Advise Owner of additional utility documentation and coordination needed during the design and construction phases to adequately assess, mitigate, and manage the impact of the Specific Project (including any additional utility facilities or extensions needed to serve the Specific Project) on existing utilities. e. Use ASCE 38, “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data” as a means to advise the Owner regarding the extent and identification and mapping of existing Underground Facilities during the design and construction phases. 1) If Owner has retained a land surveyor, utility engineer, or utility consultant, collaborate with such individuals or entities regarding the application of ASCE 38. 14. Inquire regarding survey methodologies and technologies that would aid in addressing Owner’s Specific Project requirements. Develop a scope of work and survey limits for any topographic and other surveys necessary for design. For recommended survey deliverables, specify a) required technical specifications; b) pertinent datum; c) survey limits, and d) formats of deliverables. Collaborate with land surveyor, when separately retained by Owner or third party, to develop such scope of work. 15. Prepare a report (the “Report”) which will, as appropriate, contain schematic layouts, sketches, and conceptual design criteria with appropriate exhibits to indicate the agreed-to requirements, considerations involved, and Engineer’s recommended solution(s). a. For each recommended solution, Engineer will separately tabulate Total Project Cost, itemizing those items and services included within the definition of Total Project Costs. b. Engineer will meet with Owner to discuss the draft Report and receive Owner’s comments. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 26 16. Perform or provide the following other Study and Report Phase tasks or deliverables: a.[List any such tasks or deliverables here]. 17. Furnish the Report and any other Study and Report Phase deliverables to Owner pursuant to the requirements of the Deliverables Schedule in Exhibit B, and review the deliverables with Owner. 18. Revise the Report and any other Study and Report Phase deliverables in response to Owner’s comments, as appropriate, and submit revised deliverables pursuant to the Deliverables Schedule. B.A.Engineer’s services under the Study and Report Phase will be considered complete on the date when Engineer has delivered to Owner the final Report (as revised) and any other Study and Report Phase deliverables.Not included in this task order 1.03 Preliminary Design Phase A. After acceptance by Owner of the Report and any other Study and Report Phase deliverables (if Engineer’s services under this Agreement included Study and Report Phase services); selection by Owner of a recommended solution; issuance by Owner of any instructions for use of Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, and Techniques, or for inclusion of sustainable features in the design, or enhanced resiliency of the design; indication by Owner of any specific modifications or changes in the scope, extent, character, or design requirements of the Specific Project desired by Owner; and any necessary changes, refinements, and supplementation of the Baseline Information set forth at the beginning of this Exhibit A, Engineer and Owner shall discuss, resolve, and document in writing any necessary revisions to Engineer’s scope of services, compensation (through application of the provisions regarding Additional Services, or otherwise), and the time for completion of Engineer’s services, resulting from the selected solution, related Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, or Techniques, sustainable design and resiliency instructions, specific modifications to the Specific Project, or changes, refinements, or supplementation of the Baseline Information. B. Upon written authorization from Owner, Engineer shall: 1. Review and assess all available Specific Project information and data, including any pertinent reports or studies (whether prepared by Engineer or others) and any related instructions from Owner. 2. Based on the threshold review and assessment of available information and data, advise Owner of any need for Owner to obtain, furnish, or otherwise make available to Engineer any additional information and data, for Engineer’s use in the preparation of a Preliminary Design Phase Report. 3. Prepare a Preliminary Design Phase Report in the following format a.narrative report with calculations and summary of design decisions as described below b.assemblage of preliminary construction plans. 4. The Preliminary Design Phase Report will consist of final design criteria, preliminary drawings, a preliminary list of expected specifications, and written descriptions of the Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 26 Specific Project. The Preliminary Design Phase Report will consider the following matters to the extent applicable to the Specific Project and as necessary to establish the basis of design for proceeding to final design and construction: a. The Specific Project concept, intent, performance criteria, desired outcomes, Owner’s standards and Owner directed improvements and facility elements as established in the Study and Report Phase and as expressly set forth in the Baseline Information section of this Exhibit A (collectively the “Specific Project Goals”). b. Recommended appropriate design criteria for each primary portion and significant discipline of the design necessary to address the Specific Project Goals. c. Site conditions and characterization as known at the time of, or to be determined during, the Preliminary Design Phase, including topography; subsurface information; Constituents of Concern; cultural, historical, and archaeological resources at the Site; wetlands information; and evaluations of flora and fauna that may be affected by the Specific Project. d. The time schedule for completion of the Specific Project in accordance with Specific Project Goals, including any recommended changes to the time required to complete the Final Design Phase (as set forth in Exhibit B, Deliverables Schedule) and estimated schedule(s) for construction. e. Identification of major items of materials and equipment, rationale for selection with consideration of quality, suitability, pricing, sourcing, regulatory, and bidding issues affecting recommended selection. f. Revised opinions of probable Construction Cost. g. The impact of Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, and Techniques, sustainable features, and enhanced resiliency selected by Owner for inclusion in the Specific Project on the Specific Project Goals, schedule and probable Construction Cost, including impact of multiple prime construction contracts, separate procurement of materials or equipment, and other alternate project delivery methods when the Specific Project Goals necessitate and Owner authorizes; h. Construction Phase quality assurance and quality control needs affecting development of Drawings and Specifications and other Final Design and Bidding Phase documents. i. The effect of permits and authorizations by other entities and utility coordination needs on the Specific Project. j. Other matters and information pertinent to addressing the Specific Project Goals. 5. In preparing the Preliminary Design Phase Report, use any specific applicable Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, and Techniques authorized by Owner during or following the Study and Report Phase, and include sustainable features and enhanced resiliency, as appropriate, pursuant to Owner’s instructions. 6. Visit the Site as needed to prepare the Preliminary Design Phase Report. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 6 of 26 7. If at any point in the Preliminary Design Phase it becomes apparent to Engineer that additional reports, data, information, or services of the types described in Article 2 are necessary, then so advise Owner, and assist Owner in obtaining such reports, data, information, or services. 8. Above-Ground Utilities a. Review above-ground utilities information obtained from Owner and from observations at the Site. b. Make recommendations regarding any further identification, investigation, and mapping of above-ground utilities at or adjacent to the Site, for Engineer’s design purposes or otherwise. c. Account for above-ground utilities, based on available information, when advancing design during the Preliminary Design Phase. 9. Underground Facilities a. Review Underground Facilities data furnished by Owner. Assist Owner in reducing and managing risks associated with Underground Facilities by working together with Owner to jointly establish a procedure (“Underground Facilities Procedure”) for the further identification, investigation, and mapping of Underground Facilities at or adjacent to the Site, using ASCE 38, “Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data,” as a basis for establishing such Underground Facilities Procedure. b. Such Underground Facilities Procedure must take into account the Site and the nature of the Specific Project. c. Use the Underground Facilities Procedure to aid in the performance of design services: 1) Account for Underground Facilities, based on available information, when advancing the design during the Preliminary Design Phase. 2) The Underground Facilities Procedure will include a plan to keep Underground Facilities information current as Engineer proceeds with the provision of design services, and to add new or relocated Underground Facilities information to the base utility or Site drawings. 3) To manage the potential impact of design changes on Underground Facilities, Engineer shall work together with Owner to modify or reapply the Underground Facilities Procedure as the design progresses and changes. 10. Mitigation of Utilities Conflicts a. Identify potential conflicts between the Specific Project (including existing and new facilities and structures) and above-ground utilities and Underground Facilities as reviewed in Exhibit A Paragraphs 1.03.B.8 and 9 above, and advise Owner regarding the need for resolution of such conflicts with utility and Underground Facilities owners and permit agencies. Identify the potential need for the relocation of existing above-ground utilities and Underground Facilities. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 7 of 26 b. Update the Underground Facilities Procedure as necessary for any Underground Utilities conflicts and relocations. c. Working together with Owner, jointly identify which specific parties or other entities will be responsible for implementation of the various specific parts of the Underground Facilities Procedure (including those parts that address resolution of Underground Facilities conflicts), and for resolution of above-ground utilities conflicts. Such identification will take into account Owner’s authority and standing, as owner of the Site, with respect to Underground Facilities and above-ground utilities. 1) To the extent that Owner and Engineer agree that in addition to performing the design-related obligations set forth in Exhibit A Paragraphs 1.03.B.8 and 9, Engineer will also implement any non-design part of the Underground Facilities Procedure (including resolution of Underground Facilities conflicts), or undertake resolution of above-ground utilities conflicts, such additional duties will be Additional Services under Article 2 of this Exhibit A. 11. Surveys, Topographic Mapping, and Utility Documentation a. Coordinate with Owner’s utility engineer, utility consultant, or land surveyor for the necessary field surveys, topographic mapping, and utility documentation required for Engineer’s design purposes, or by the Underground Facilities Procedure. b. If no scope of work and procedure for utility documentation has been established, selected, or authorized, then at a minimum Engineer will contact utility owners and obtain available information. Except as otherwise provided in this Agreement, Owner acknowledges that the information gathered from utility owners may be incorrect, incomplete, outdated, or otherwise flawed, and as to Engineer, bidders, and Contractor, the Owner accepts all associated risks. Owner reserves all associated rights as to recourse against the sources of such flawed information and against third parties. 12. Prepare initial draft of a comprehensive permit document that identifies Owner’s permit duties, Engineer’s permit duties, and Contractor’s permit duties, and the schedule for permitting activities. 13. Continue to assist Owner with Specific Project Strategies, Technologies, and Techniques that Owner has chosen to implement in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.03.A. 14. Obtain Owner’s instructions regarding Owner’s procurement of construction services (including instructions regarding advertisements for bids, instructions to bidders, and requests for proposals, as applicable), Owner’s construction contract practices and requirements, insurance and bonding requirements, electronic transmittals during construction, and other information necessary for the finalization of Owner’s Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front-End Construction Contract Documents. a. Also obtain copies of Owner’s standard Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front- End Construction Contract Documents (if other thanmodified version of the EJCDC 2018 Construction Series documents), and any other related documents or content Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 8 of 26 for Engineer to include in drafts of the Specific Project-specific Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front-End Construction Contract Documents, when applicable. b. Review Owner’s instructions regarding procurement, bidding and contracting of construction services with respect to effects on the Specific Project design, schedule and construction and address as needed in the Preliminary Design Phase deliverables. 15. Prepare the Preliminary Design Phase Report. This Report will consist of, as appropriate, separate or combined submittals in whole or summary, the Preliminary Design Phase documents listed in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.03.B.4, and Engineer’s findings and recommendations for advancing the Specific Project to the Final Design Phase (including Engineer’s findings and recommendations, if any, regarding permitting, utilities, and Underground Facilities). The submittal will be in the format of a report, or otherwise organized and assembled for ease and practicality of use. a. Based on the information contained in the Preliminary Design Phase documents, prepare a revised opinion of probable Construction Cost, and on the basis of information furnished by Owner, assist Owner in tabulating the various cost categories which comprise Total Project Costs. b. Engineer will meet with Owner to discuss the draft Preliminary Design Phase submittal and receive Owner’s comments. 16. Perform or provide the following other Preliminary Design Phase tasks or deliverables: a.Topographic Survey: Establish primary control for the length of the project. Provide survey quality level C utility locates, develop an existing conditions model for the width of the anticipated right of way b.Roadway Design: Provide typical existing and proposed roadway sections following City of Schertz Design Criteria. Establish a proposed roadway horizontal and vertical profiles. Provide plan and profile for the street at a 1:20 scale on 22”x34” plan sheets. Provide cross sections of the proposed roadway at 50-foot per City design criteria. Provide a summary of driveway improvements. c.Drainage Design: Provide a drainage area map and model existing and proposed hydrology per the city design criteria. Appropriately size and situate culvert design at stream crossings. Provide culvert plans and sections. d.Utility Design: Coordinate with non- City maintained utilities located within the construction limits. Provide plans and profiles, as appropriate, for relocation of existing water utilities as necessary. e.Temporary Traffic Control Design: Provide Preliminary plans for construction phasing, traffic control sections and construction phasing layout. 17. Furnish the Preliminary Design Phase Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and any other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables to Owner pursuant to the requirements of the Deliverables Schedule in Exhibit B, and review the deliverables with Owner. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 9 of 26 18. Revise the Report and any other deliverables in response to Owner’s comments, as appropriate, and submit revised deliverables pursuant to the Deliverables Schedule. C. Engineer’s services under the Preliminary Design Phase will be considered complete on the date when Engineer has delivered to Owner the final Preliminary Design Phase Report (as revised) and associated documents, revised opinion of probable Construction Cost, and any other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables. 1.04 Final Design Phase A. After acceptance by Owner of the Preliminary Design Phase Report and any other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables; issuance by Owner of any instructions for specific modifications or changes in the scope, extent, character, or design requirements of the Specific Project desired by Owner; and any necessary changes, refinements, and supplementation of the Baseline Information set forth at the beginning of this Exhibit A, Engineer and Owner shall discuss, resolve, and document any necessary revisions to Engineer’s scope of services, compensation (through application of the provisions regarding Additional Services, or otherwise), and the time for completion of Engineer’s services, resulting from specific modifications to the Specific Project, or changes, refinements, or supplementation of the Baseline Information. 1. The number of prime contracts for Work designed or specified by Engineer upon which the Engineer’s compensation has been established under this Agreement is one (1) If more prime contracts are awarded, Engineer shall be entitled to an equitable increase in its compensation under this Agreement. 2. If more than one prime construction contract is to be awarded for the Work designed or specified by Engineer, then Owner shall define and set forth (in an exhibit to this Agreement, or in a subsequent document) the duties, responsibilities, and limitations of authority of a person or entity that will have authority and responsibility for coordinating the activities among the various prime Contractors, and any resulting changes in the duties, responsibilities, and authority of Engineer. 3. In the event that the Work designed or specified by Engineer is to be performed or furnished under more than one prime construction contract, or if Engineer’s services are to be separately sequenced with the work of one or more separate design professional consultants or prime Contractors (such as in the case of fast-tracking), Owner and Engineer shall, prior to commencement of the Final Design Phase, develop a schedule for performance of Engineer’s services during the Final Design, Bidding/Proposal, Construction, and Post-Construction Phases in order to sequence and coordinate properly such services as are applicable under such separate prime construction contracts. This schedule is to be prepared and included in or become an amendment to Exhibit A whether or not the work under such construction contracts is to proceed concurrently. B. Upon written authorization from Owner, Engineer shall prepare final Drawings and Specifications indicating the scope, extent, and character of the Work to be performed and furnished by Contractor, in accordance with the Preliminary Design Phase Report (as revised) and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables. As part of the preparation of the Drawings and Specifications, Engineer shall prepare interim drafts and final Drawings and Specifications as follows, pursuant to the Deliverables Schedule in Exhibit B: Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 10 of 26 1. First Final Design Phase draft of all Drawings and Specifications. 2. Second Final Design Phase draft of all Drawings and Specifications, addressing Owner comments and including appropriate design advancement. 3.2.Final Drawings and Specifications that address Owner comments; complete the design; are suitable for estimating and pricing by prospective Contractors; and are complete and ready for construction. C. In preparing the Specifications (and any bidding, contract, or other documents that are part of Engineer’s scope of services), Engineer shall obtain from Owner or Owner’s legal counsel any relevant constraints such as requirements for use of domestic steel and iron, other domestic purchasing requirements, statutory restrictions on utilizing proprietary specifying methods, and the like, and comply with or account for such constraints in drafting Specifications, Bidding/Proposal Documents, and other Specific Project documents. D. Engineer shall prepare or assemble draft Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front-End Construction Contract Documents as follows: 1. Such documents will be based on the 2018 EJCDC Construction Documents, and on the specific bidding or Contractor selection-related instructions and forms, contract forms, text, or other content received from Owner. 2. When Engineer is required to use other than the 2018 EJCDC Construction Documents, then as required in the Preliminary Design Phase Owner will furnish to Engineer a copy of the required documents to be used for the Specific Project’s Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front-End Construction Contract Documents. Prior to the first Final Design Phase submittal, Engineer will review the bidding and contracting documents furnished by Owner and provide comments to Owner. Engineer will meet with Owner to discuss Engineer’s comments. Owner will consider Engineer’s recommendations to revise Owner’s documents for the Specific Project. 3. Engineer will furnish to Owner, for review by Owner’s legal counsel, the draft Bidding/Proposal Documents and Front-End Construction Contract Documents. Owner and Owner’s legal counsel must transmit to Engineer, in a timely manner, one coordinated set of comments and revisions to the draft documents. E. During the Final Design Phase the Engineer shall continue to account for above-ground utilities and Underground Facilities as the design advances and is finalized. This may include: 1. performing the services assigned to Engineer under the Underground Facilities Procedure described in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.03 above, including but not limited to the design-related tasks in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.03.B.9. 2. addressing required and proposed activities or mitigations identified in the analysis of utilities and by the Underground Facilities Procedure as having an impact on the final design, and considering such in preparing the Drawings and Specifications. F. Engineer shall perform or furnish the following other Final Design Phase services: 1. Visit the Site as needed to assist in preparing the final Drawings and Specifications. 2. Assist with or prepare applications for permits and approvals, as follows: Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 11 of 26 a. Update comprehensive permit document created in Preliminary Design Phase for Final Design detail. b. Prepare the following applications for Owner’s submittal to authorities having jurisdiction over the construction or operation of the Specific Project: 1)Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation for ADA Compliance and permitting if the monetary amount of pedestrian improvements exceeds $50,000. c. Confer with Owner regarding revisions, if any, to the application(s), and make appropriate revisions to the application(s) for Owner’s resubmittal to the authority having jurisdiction. d. Provide technical criteria, written descriptions, and design data for Owner’s use in filing applications for permits from or approvals of the authorities having jurisdiction listed above, including applications for review or approval of the final design. e. Identify and indicate in the Construction Contract Documents the permits and approvals for which Contractor will be responsible, including work permits, building permits, and other permits and approvals that will be Contractor’s responsibility; and, in addition, indicate those permits initially obtained by Owner for which Contractor will be a co-permittee, together with associated requirements. f. Unless expressly indicated otherwise, Engineer’s scope and budget includes attending one meeting or conference call with each permit and approval-issuing agency to discuss the Specific Project and receive the agency’s comments on the application. g. Engineer does not guarantee issuance of any required permit or approval. h. Fees charged by authorities having jurisdiction for such permits or approvals are the responsibility of Owner. 3. Advise Owner of any recommended adjustments to the opinion of probable Construction Cost. Furnish to Owner an updated opinion of probable Construction Cost with the interim and final deliverables of the Drawings and Specifications. 4. After consultation with Owner, include in the Front-End Construction Contract Documents any Electronic Document Protocol addressing specific protocols for the transmittal of Specific Project-related correspondence, documents, text, data, drawings, information, and graphics, in electronic media or digital format, either directly, or through access to a secure Specific Project website. 5. Assist Owner in assembling known reports and drawings of Site conditions, and in identifying the technical data contained in such reports and drawings upon which bidders or other prospective contractors may rely. 6. Review the preliminary schedule for the Construction Phase and advise Owner when initial understanding of the Construction Contract Times must or should be revised, and furnish Owner with recommendations on revisions to the proposed Construction Contract Times. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 12 of 26 7. Engineer’s project manager and other appropriate staff will participate in the following meetings and conference calls: a. First draft design review meeting at Owner’s office. b. Second draft design review meeting at Owner’s office. c.[Indicate others as appropriate for the Specific Project]. d.b.Engineer will prepare and distribute minutes of each such meeting and conference call, indicating attendees, topics discussed, decisions made, and action items for follow-up. 8. Perform or provide the following other Final Design Phase activities or deliverables: a.Roadway Design: Provide typical existing and proposed roadway sections following City of Schertz Design Criteria. Establish a proposed roadway horizontal and vertical profiles. Provide plan and profile for the street at a 1:20 scale on 22”x34” plan sheets. Provide cross sections of the proposed roadway at 50-foot per City design criteria. Provide a summary of driveway improvements. b.Drainage Design: Provide a drainage area map and model existing and proposed hydrology per the city design criteria. Appropriately size and situate culvert design at stream crossings. Provide culvert plans and sections. Provide a final storm water report. c.Utility Design: Coordinate with non- City maintained utilities located within the construction limits. Provide plans and profiles, as appropriate, for relocation of existing water utilities as necessary. d.Temporary Traffic Control Design: Provide Preliminary plans for construction phasing, traffic control sections and construction phasing layout. Provide a traffic detour layout and barricade plan e.Pavement Marking Plans: Provide pavement marking plans compliant with local and state standards. f.SWPPP- Provide an erosion control plan, narrative, and appropriate details for facilitate the submittal of a Notice of Intent by the contractor. g.Provide a tree mitigation plans for the removal of existing trees. G. Engineer shall complete the Final Design Phase as follows: 1. Pursuant to the requirements of the Deliverables Schedule in Exhibit B, furnish for review by Owner, its legal counsel, and other advisors, the final Drawings and Specifications (as set forth in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.04.B.3 above); assembled drafts of other Construction Contract Documents including the draft Front-End Construction Contract Documents; the draft Bidding/Proposal Documents; the most recent opinion of probable Construction Cost; and any other Final Design Phase deliverables, and review the deliverables with Owner. 2. Revise the final Design Phase deliverables in response to Owner’s comments, as appropriate, and submit revised deliverables pursuant to the Deliverables Schedule. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 13 of 26 3. Engineer’s services under the Final Design Phase will be considered complete on the date when Engineer has delivered to Owner the final Drawings and Specifications; assembled drafts of the Front-End Construction Contract Documents; the draft Bidding/Proposal Documents; and any other Final Design Phase deliverables, as revised. 1.05 Bidding/Proposal Phase A. After acceptance by Owner of the final Drawings and Specifications; assembled drafts of other Construction Contract Documents, including the draft Front-End Construction Contract Documents; the draft Bidding/Proposal Documents; the most recent opinion of probable Construction Cost as determined in the Final Design Phase, and any other Final Design Phase deliverables, and upon written authorization by Owner to proceed, Engineer shall: 1. Assist Owner in advertising for and obtaining bids or proposals for the Work; assist Owner in issuing assembled Bidding/Proposal Documents and proposed Construction Contract Documents to prospective contractors; if applicable, maintain a record of prospective contractors to which documents have been issued; attend pre-bid conferences, if any; and receive and process contractor deposits or charges, if any, for the issued documents. a.Owner’s procurement website 2. Prepare and issue addenda as appropriate to clarify, correct, or change the issued documents. 3. If the issued documents require, the Engineer shall evaluate and determine the acceptability of "or equals" and substitute materials and equipment proposed by prospective contractors, provided that such proposals are allowed by the bidding- related documents (or requests for proposals or other construction procurement documents) prior to award of contracts for the Work. Services under this paragraph are subject to the provisions of Exhibit A Paragraph 2.01.A.2. 4. Attend the bid opening; prepare bid tabulation sheets; and assist Owner in evaluating bids or proposals, assembling final Construction Contracts for the Work for execution by Owner and Contractor, and in preparing notices of award to be issued by Owner for such contracts. 5. Provide information or assistance needed by Owner in the course of any review of bids, proposals, or negotiations with prospective contractors. 6. Consult with Owner as to the qualifications of prospective contractors. 7. Consult with Owner as to the qualifications of subcontractors, suppliers, and other individuals and entities proposed by prospective contractors, for those portions of the Work as to which review of qualifications is required by the issued documents. 8. If Owner engages in negotiations with bidders or proposers, assist Owner with respect to technical and engineering issues that arise during the negotiations. 9. Perform or provide the following other Bidding/Proposal Phase tasks or deliverables: a.none Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 14 of 26 10. The Bidding/Proposal Phase will be considered complete upon award of Construction Contracts for the Work and commencement of the Construction Phase, or upon cessation of negotiations with prospective contractors. 1.06 Construction Phase A. After completion of the Final Design Phase and concurrent with the Bidding/Proposal Phase, and after issuance by Owner of any instructions for specific modifications or changes in the scope, extent, character, design, schedule, number of prime construction contracts, and other construction requirements of the Specific Project during the Construction Phase desired by Owner, the Engineer and Owner shall discuss, resolve, and document any necessary revisions to Engineer’s scope of services or compensation (through application of the provisions regarding Additional Services, or otherwise), or the time for completion of Engineer’s services, resulting from specific modifications to the Specific Project. 1. Engineer shall be responsible only for those Construction Phase services expressly required of Engineer in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.06, as duly modified. With the exception of such expressly required services, Engineer shall have no design, Submittal (including Shop Drawing) review, or other obligations during construction, and Owner assumes all responsibility for providing or arranging for all other necessary Construction Phase administrative, engineering, and professional services. 2. Owner waives all claims against Engineer and its officers, directors, members, partners, agents, employees, and Subconsultants, and Engineer’s Subcontractors, that may be connected in any way to Construction Phase administrative, engineering, or professional services except for those services that are expressly required of Engineer in Exhibit A. Notwithstanding the foregoing waiver, Engineer shall be responsible for any professional opinions and interpretations provided by Engineer to Owner during the Construction Phase or Post-Construction Phase, including interpretations or clarifications of the Construction Contract Documents. B. Upon successful completion of the Bidding/Proposal Phase, and upon written authorization from Owner, Engineer shall provide the following services: 1. General Administration of Construction Contract: Consult with Owner and act as Owner’s representative as provided in this Agreement and the Construction Contract. Unless otherwise set forth in the scope of Basic Services (as duly modified), the extent and limitations of the duties, responsibilities, and authority of Engineer shall be as assigned in EJCDC® C-700, Standard General Conditions of the Construction Contract (2018) or other construction general conditions specified in this Agreement. Except as otherwise provided in the Construction Contract, Owner’s communications to Contractor will be issued through Engineer. a. If the responsibilities of Engineer as set forth in the Construction Contract are greater than those Construction Phase services expressly required of Engineer in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.06, as duly modified, then Owner shall either (1) expand the scope of the Construction Phase services to match those of the Construction Contract, and compensate Engineer for any related increases in the cost to provide Construction Phase services, pursuant to the provisions for compensating Additional Services, or (2) identify a qualified individual or entity (other than Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 15 of 26 Engineer) responsible for the additional responsibilities in the Construction Contract. b. If Owner, or Owner and Contractor, modify the duties, responsibilities, and authority of Engineer in the Construction Contract, or modify other terms of the Construction Contract having a direct bearing on Engineer, or if Owner requires Engineer’s services for construction that extends longer than the anticipated Construction Contract Times, then Owner shall compensate Engineer for any related increases in the cost to provide Construction Phase services, pursuant to the provisions for compensating Additional Services. c. Engineer shall not be required to furnish or perform services contrary to Engineer’s responsibilities as a licensed professional. 2. Field Office: [Delete or edit as applicable to the Specific Project] Engineer and Resident Project Representative (if any) will be based in a field office at the Site. The field office will be furnished and maintained at Owner’s expense, and will include reasonable furnishings, all required temporary utilities (including internet service) and facilities, and be secured for Engineer’s (and RPR’s) exclusive use.Deleted 3.Resident Project Representative (RPR): Provide the services of an RPR at the Site to assist Engineer and to provide more extensive observation of Contractor’s Work. Duties, responsibilities, and authority of the RPR are as set forth in Exhibit D. The furnishing of such RPR’s services will not limit, extend, or modify Engineer’s responsibilities or authority except as expressly set forth in Exhibit D. [If Engineer will not be providing RPR services under the specific Task Order, then delete this Paragraph 3 by inserting the word “DELETED” after the paragraph title; do not include Exhibit D as an exhibit to the specific Task Order; and do not include RPR compensation in Paragraph 7 of the Exhibit specific Task OrderDeleted.] 4. Selection of Independent Testing Laboratory: Assist Owner in the selection of an independent testing laboratory to perform required testing services. 5. Pre-Construction Conference: Participate in a pre-construction conference prior to commencement of Work at the Site; prepare and distribute agenda for the conference and prepare and distribute minutes of such conference. 6. Electronic Transmittal Protocols: If the Construction Contract does not establish protocols for transmittal of Electronic Documents by Electronic Means, then Owner, Engineer, and Contractor shall jointly develop such protocols. 7. Original Documents: If requested by Owner to do so, maintain and safeguard during the Construction Phase at least one original printed record version of the Construction Contract Documents, including Drawings and Specifications signed and sealed by Engineer and other design professionals in accordance with applicable Laws and Regulations. Throughout the Construction Phase, make such original printed record version of the Construction Contract Documents available to Contractor and Owner for review. 8. Schedules: Receive, review, and, and, subject to the criteria of the Construction Contract, determine the acceptability of any and all schedules that Contractor is required to submit to Engineer, including the progress schedule, schedule of submittals, Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 16 of 26 and schedule of values. Advise Contractor in writing of Engineer’s comments or acceptance of schedules. a. Schedules will be acceptable to Engineer as to form and substance: 1) Progress Schedule: if it provides an orderly progression of the Work to completion within the Contract Times. Such acceptance will not impose on Engineer responsibility for the Progress Schedule, for sequencing, scheduling, or progress of the Work, nor interfere with or relieve Contractor from Contractor’s full responsibility therefor. 2) Contractor’s Schedule of Submittals: if it provides a workable arrangement for reviewing and processing the required Submittals. 3) Contractor’s Schedule of Values: if it provides a reasonable allocation of the Contract Price to the component parts of the Work. 9. Baselines and Benchmarks: As appropriate, establish baselines and benchmarks for locating the Work which in Engineer’s judgment are necessary to enable Contractor to proceed. 10. Permits: Provide Owner with copies of technical information and supporting data previously obtained or developed by Engineer for Owner’s use, or for Owner to provide to Contractor, in obtaining required permits and licenses delegated to Contractor by Owner. 11. Visits to Site and Observation of Construction: In connection with observations of Contractor’s Work while it is in progress: a. Make visits to the Site at intervals appropriate to the various stages of the Work, as Engineer deems necessary, to observe as an experienced and qualified design professional, the progress of Contractor’s executed Work. Such visits and observations by Engineer, including its RPR, if any, are not intended to be exhaustive or to extend to every aspect of the Work or to involve detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement and the Construction Contract Documents, but rather are to be limited to spot checking, selective sampling, and similar methods of general observation of the Work based on Engineer’s exercise of professional judgment, as assisted by its RPR, if any. Based on information obtained during such visits and observations, Engineer will determine in general if the Work is proceeding in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents, and Engineer shall keep Owner informed of the progress of the Work. Engineer will make a report of Engineer’s visit, summarizing Engineer’s general observations and any significant findings. b. The purpose of Engineer’s visits to the Site, and representation by the Resident Project Representative, if any, at the Site, will be to enable Engineer to better carry out the duties and responsibilities assigned to by this Agreement and undertaken by Engineer during the Construction Phase, and, in addition, by the exercise of Engineer’s efforts as an experienced and qualified design professional, to provide for Owner a greater degree of confidence that the completed Work will conform in general to the Construction Contract Documents and that Contractor has Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 17 of 26 implemented and maintained the integrity of the design concept of the completed Specific Project as a functioning whole as indicated in the Construction Contract Documents. Engineer will not, during such visits or as a result of such observations of the Work, supervise, direct, or have control over the Work, nor will Engineer have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected or used by any Constructor, for security or safety at the Site, for safety precautions and programs incident to any Constructor’s work in progress, for the coordination of the Constructors’ work or schedules, nor for any failure of any Constructor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to furnishing and performing of its work. Accordingly, Engineer neither guarantees the performance of any Constructor nor assumes responsibility for any Constructor’s failure to furnish or perform the Work, or any portion of the Work, in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. 12. Defective Work: If, on the basis of Engineer’s observations or as indicated in documentation available to Engineer, Engineer believes that any part of the Work is defective under the terms and standards set forth in the Construction Contract Documents, Engineer will promptly issue written notice to Contractor (with copy to Owner) of such defective Work. Such notice will communicate the scope, extent (to Engineer’s understanding) of defect, and associated provisions of the Construction Contract Documents. a. Provide recommendations to Owner regarding whether Contractor should correct such Work or remove and replace such Work, or whether Owner should consider accepting the defective Work in accordance with the provisions of the Construction Contract Documents. Engineer shall give notice to Contractor regarding whether the defective Work should be repaired, replaced, or will be accepted by Owner. b. However, Engineer’s authority to provide this information to Owner or Engineer’s decision to exercise or not exercise such authority will not give rise to a duty or responsibility of the Engineer to Contractors, Subcontractors, material and equipment suppliers, their agents or employees, or any other person(s) or entities performing any of the Work, including but not limited to any duty or responsibility for Contractors’ or Subcontractors’ safety precautions and programs incident to the Work. 13. Compatibility with Design Concept: If Engineer has express knowledge that a specific part of the Work that is not defective under the terms and standards set forth in the Construction Contract Documents is nonetheless not compatible with the design concept of the completed Specific Project as a functioning whole, then inform Owner of such incompatibility, and provide recommendations for addressing such Work. 14. Clarifications and Interpretations: Accept from Contractor and Owner submittal of all matters in question concerning the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents (sometimes referred to as requests for information or interpretation—RFIs), or relating to the acceptability of the Work under the Construction Contract Documents. With reasonable promptness, render a written clarification, interpretation, or decision on the issue submitted, or initiate an amendment or supplement to the Construction Contract Documents. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 18 of 26 15. Non-reviewable Matters: If a submitted matter in question concerns the Engineer’s performance of its duties and obligations, or terms and conditions of the Construction Contract Documents that do not involve (a) the performance or acceptability of the Work under the Construction Contract Documents, (b) the design (as set forth in the Drawings, Specifications, or otherwise), or (c) other engineering or technical matters, then Engineer will promptly give written notice to Owner and Contractor that Engineer will not provide a decision or interpretation. 16. Field Orders: Subject to any limitations in the Construction Contract Documents, Engineer may prepare and issue Field Orders requiring minor changes in the Work. 17. Change Orders and Work Change Directives: Recommend Change Orders and Work Change Directives to Owner, as appropriate, and prepare Change Orders and Work Change Directives as required. 18. Change Proposals and Claims a. Review and respond to Change Proposals. Review each duly submitted Change Proposal from Contractor and, within 30 days after receipt of the Contractor’s supporting data, either deny the Change Proposal in whole, approve it in whole, or deny it in part and approve it in part. Such actions must be in writing, with a copy provided to Owner and Contractor. If the Change Proposal does not involve the design (as set forth in the Drawings, Specifications, or otherwise), the acceptability of the Work, or other engineering or technical matters, then Engineer will notify the parties that the Engineer will not resolve the Change Proposal. b. Provide information or data to Owner regarding engineering or technical matters pertaining to Claims. 19. Differing Site Conditions: Respond to any notice from Contractor of differing site conditions, including conditions relating to Underground Facilities such as utilities, and hazardous environmental conditions. Promptly conduct reviews and prepare findings, conclusions, and recommendations for Owner’s use subject to limitations of Engineer’s obligations under this Agreement. 20. Contractor’s Submittals: Review and approve or take other appropriate action with respect to required Contractor Submittals, but only to determine if the items covered by the Submittals will, after installation or incorporation in the Work, comply with the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents, and for compatibility with the design concept of the completed Specific Project as a functioning whole as indicated by the Construction Contract Documents. Such reviews and approvals or other action will not extend to means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or to safety precautions and programs incident thereto. Engineer shall meet any Contractor’s Submittal schedule that Engineer has accepted. 21. Substitutes and “Or-equals”: Evaluate and determine the acceptability of substitute or “or-equal” materials and equipment proposed by Contractor, but subject to the provisions of Exhibit A Paragraph 2.01.A.2. 22. Inspections and Tests Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 19 of 26 a. Receive and review all certificates of inspections, tests, and approvals required by Laws and Regulations or the Construction Contract Documents. Engineer’s review of such certificates will be for the purpose of determining whether the results certified indicate compliance with the Construction Contract Documents and will not constitute an independent evaluation that the content or procedures of such inspections, tests, or approvals comply with the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents. Engineer shall be entitled to rely on the results of such inspections and tests. b. Reply to Contractor requests for written concurrence that specific portions of the Work that are to be inspected, tested, or approved may be covered. c. Issue written requests to Contractor that specific portions of the Work remain uncovered. d. As deemed reasonably necessary, request that Contractor uncover Work that is to be inspected, tested, or approved. e. Pursuant to the terms of the Construction Contract, require additional inspections or testing of the Work, whether or not the Work is fabricated, installed, or completed. 23. Contractor’s Applications for Payment: Based on Engineer’s observations as an experienced and qualified design professional and on review of Applications for Payment and accompanying supporting documentation: a. Determine the amounts that Engineer recommends Contractor be paid. Recommend reductions in payment (set offs) based on the provisions for set offs stated in the Construction Contract. Such recommendations of payment will be in writing and will constitute Engineer’s representation to Owner, based on such observations and review, that, within the limits of Engineer’s knowledge, information and belief, Contractor’s Work has progressed to the point indicated, the Work is generally in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents (subject to an evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of any subsequent tests called for in the Construction Contract Documents, and to any other qualifications stated in the recommendation), and the conditions precedent to Contractor’s being entitled to such payment appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is Engineer’s responsibility to observe the Work. In the case of unit price Work, Engineer’s recommendations of payment will include final determinations of quantities and classifications of the Work (subject to any subsequent adjustments allowed by the Construction Contract Documents). b. By recommending payment, Engineer shall not thereby be deemed to have represented that observations made by Engineer to check the quality or quantity of Contractor’s Work as it is performed and furnished have been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of Contractor’s Work in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer in this Agreement. Neither Engineer’s review of Contractor’s Work for the purposes of recommending payments nor Engineer’s recommendation of any payment including final payment will impose on Engineer responsibility to Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 20 of 26 supervise, direct, or control the Work, or for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction or safety precautions or programs incident thereto, or Contractor’s compliance with Laws and Regulations applicable to Contractor’s furnishing and performing the Work. It will also not impose responsibility on Engineer to make any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes Contractor has used the money paid to Contractor by Owner; to determine that title to any portion of the Work, including materials or equipment, has passed to Owner free and clear of any liens, claims, security interests, or encumbrances; or that there may not be other matters at issue between Owner and Contractor that might affect the amount that should be paid. 24. Contractor’s Completion Documents: Receive from Contractor, review, and transmit to Owner maintenance and operating instructions, schedules, guarantees, bonds, certificates or other evidence of insurance required by the Construction Contract Documents, certificates of inspection, tests and approvals, and Shop Drawings, Samples, and other data approved as provided under Exhibit A Paragraph 1.06.B.20. Receive from Contractor, review, and transmit to Owner the annotated record documents which are to be assembled by Contractor in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents to obtain final payment. The extent of Engineer’s review of record documents will be to check that Contractor has submitted a complete set of those documents that Contractor is required to submit. 25. Substantial Completion: Promptly after notice from Contractor that Contractor considers the entire Work ready for its intended use, visit the Site in company with Owner and Contractor to review the Work and determine the status of completion. Follow the procedures in the Construction Contract regarding the preliminary certificate of Substantial Completion, punch list of items to be completed, Owner’s objections, notice to Contractor, and issuance of a final certificate of Substantial Completion. Assist Owner regarding any remaining engineering or technical matters affecting Owner’s use or occupancy of the Work following Substantial Completion. 26. Other Tasks: Perform or provide the following other Construction Phase tasks or deliverables: a.none 27. Completion and Acceptability of the Work: After notice from Contractor that the Work is complete: a. visit the Site with Owner and Contractor to determine if the Work is in fact complete and acceptable; b. notify Contractor of any part of the Work that is found during the visit to be incomplete or defective, and subsequently confirm that Contractor has corrected any such deficiencies; c. follow the procedures in the Construction Contract regarding review and response to Contractor’s application for final payment and accompanying documentation; and d. if Engineer is satisfied that the Work is complete and acceptable, provide a notice to Owner and Contractor using EJCDC® C-626, Notice of Acceptability of Work Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 21 of 26 (attached as Exhibit E), stating that the Work is acceptable (subject to the provisions of the Notice and this Exhibit A) within the limits of Engineer’s knowledge, information, and belief, and based on the extent of the services provided by Engineer under this Agreement. 28. Standards for Certain Construction-Phase Decisions: Engineer will render decisions regarding the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents, and judge the acceptability of the Work, pursuant to the specific procedures set forth in the Construction Contract for initial interpretations, Change Proposals, and acceptance of the Work. In rendering such decisions and judgments, Engineer will not show partiality to Owner or Contractor, and will not be liable to Owner, Contractor, or others in connection with any proceedings, interpretations, decisions, or judgments conducted or rendered in good faith. C. Duration of Construction Phase: The Construction Phase will commence with the execution of the first Construction Contract for the Specific Project or any part thereof and will terminate upon written recommendation by Engineer for final payment to Contractor. If the Specific Project involves more than one prime contract as indicated in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.04.A.1, then Construction Phase services may be rendered at different times in respect to the separate contracts. Subject to the provisions of Article 3, Engineer shall be entitled to an equitable increase in compensation if Construction Phase services (including Resident Project Representative services, if any) are required after the original date for completion and readiness for final payment of Contractor as set forth in the Construction Contract. 1.07 Post-Construction Phase A. Upon written authorization from Owner during the Post-Construction Phase, Engineer shall: 1. Together with Owner, visit the Specific Project to observe any apparent defects in the Work, make recommendations as to replacement or correction of defective Work, if any, or the need to repair of any damage to the Site or adjacent areas, and assist Owner in consultations and discussions with Contractor concerning correction of any such defective Work and any needed repairs. 2. Together with Owner, visit the Specific Project within one month before the end of the Construction Contract’s correction period to ascertain whether any portion of the Work or the repair of any damage to the Site or adjacent areas is defective and therefore subject to correction by Contractor. 3. Perform or provide the following other Post-Construction Phase tasks or deliverables: a.Attend TDLR inspection walkthrough b.Prepare a plan of record based on Contractor redlines approved by the City Inspector. B. The Post-Construction Phase services may commence during the Construction Phase and, if not otherwise modified in this Exhibit A, will terminate 12 months after the commencement of the Construction Contract’s correction period. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 22 of 26 ARTICLE 2—ADDITIONAL SERVICES 2.01 Additional Services Not Requiring Owner’s Written Authorization A. Engineer shall advise Owner that Engineer is commencing to perform or furnish the Additional Services of the types listed below. For such Additional Services, Engineer need not request or obtain specific advance written authorization from Owner. Engineer shall cease performing or furnishing such Additional Services upon receipt of written notice to cease from Owner. These services are not included as part of Basic Services and will be paid for by Owner as indicated in Paragraph 7 of the governing Task Order. 1. Substantive design and other technical services in connection with Work Change Directives, Change Proposals, and Change Orders to reflect changes requested by Owner. 2. Services essential to the orderly progress of the Bidding/Proposal and Construction Phases and not wholly quantifiable prior to those Phases or otherwise dependent on the actions of prospective individual bidders or contractors and including: a. making revisions to Drawings and Specifications occasioned by the acceptance of substitute materials or equipment other than “or equal” items; b. services after the award of the Construction Contract in evaluating and determining the acceptability of a proposed "or equal" or substitution which is found to be inappropriate for the Specific Project; c. evaluation and determination of an excessive number of proposed "or equals" or substitutions, whether proposed before or after award of the Construction Contract; and d. providing to the Contractor or Owner additional or new information not previously prepared or developed by the Engineer for their use in applying for or obtaining required permits and licenses, in responding to agency comments on such applications, or in the administration of any such permits or licenses. 3. Services resulting from significant delays, changes, or price increases occurring as a direct or indirect result of materials, equipment, or energy shortages. 4. Additional or extended services arising from (a) the presence at the Site of any Constituent of Concern or items of historical or cultural significance, (b) emergencies or acts of God endangering the Work, (c) damage to the Work by fire or other causes during construction, (d) a significant amount of defective, neglected, or delayed Work, (e) acceleration of the progress schedule involving services beyond normal working hours, or (f) default by Contractor. 5. Implement coordination of Engineer’s services with other parts of the Specific Project that are not planned or designed by Engineer or its Subconsultants, unless Owner furnished to Engineer substantive information about such other parts of the Specific Project prior to the parties’ entry into this Agreement, in the Baseline Information section of this Exhibit A, or otherwise in Exhibit A; if such substantive information has been so provided, coordination of Engineer’s services will be part of Basic Services. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 23 of 26 6. Implement the specific parts of an Underground Facilities Procedure that are assigned to Engineer, or above-ground utilities tasks that are assigned to Engineer as the Specific Project progresses (but not including the design-related services already assigned to Engineer as a Basic Service). 7. Services (other than Basic Services during the Post-Construction Phase) in connection with any partial utilization of the Work by Owner prior to Substantial Completion. 8. Evaluating unreasonable or frivolous requests for interpretation or information (RFIs), Change Proposals, or other demands from Contractor or others in connection with the Work, or an excessive number of RFIs, Change Proposals, or demands. 9. Reviewing a Shop Drawing or other Contractor submittal more than three times, as a result of repeated inadequate submissions by Contractor. 10. While at the Site, compliance by Engineer and its staff with those terms of Owner's or Contractor's safety program provided to Engineer subsequent to the Effective Date that exceed those normally required of engineering personnel by federal, State, or local safety authorities for similar construction sites. 11. To the extent the Specific Project is subject to Laws and Regulations governing public or government records disclosure or non-disclosure, Engineer will comply with provisions applicable to Engineer, and Owner will compensate Engineer as Additional Services for Engineer’s costs to comply with any disclosure or non-disclosure obligations beyond those identified in the Basic Services. 12. Services directly attributable to changes in Engineer’s Electronic Documents obligations after the effective date of the Agreement. 2.02 Additional Services Requiring Owner’s Written Authorization A. If authorized in writing by Owner, Engineer shall provide Additional Services of the types listed below. These services are not included as part of Basic Services and will be paid for by Owner as indicated in Paragraph 7 of the governing Task Order. 1. Obtain or provide specified additional Specific Project-related information and data to enable Engineer to complete its Basic and Additional Services. 2. Preparation of special and customized reporting, invoicing, and related support documentation in addition to that identified to be provided under Basic Services. 3. Preparation of applications and supporting documents (in addition to those furnished under Basic Services) for private or governmental grants, loans, or advances in connection with the Specific Project; preparation or review of environmental assessments and impact statements; review and evaluation of the effects on the design requirements for the Specific Project of any such statements and documents prepared by others; and assistance in obtaining approvals of authorities having jurisdiction over the anticipated environmental impact of the Specific Project. 4. Services to make measured drawings of existing conditions or facilities, to conduct tests or investigations of existing conditions or facilities, or to verify the accuracy of drawings or other information furnished by Owner or others. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 24 of 26 5. Services resulting from significant changes in the scope, extent, or character of the portions of the Specific Project designed or specified by Engineer, or the Specific Project’s design requirements, including, but not limited to, changes in size, complexity, Owner’s schedule, character of construction, or method of financing; and revising previously accepted studies, reports, Drawings, Specifications, or Construction Contract Documents when such revisions are required by changes in Laws and Regulations enacted subsequent to the Effective Date or are due to any other causes beyond Engineer’s control. 6. Services resulting from Owner’s request to evaluate additional Study and Report Phase alternative solutions beyond those agreed to in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.02.A.1. 7. Services required as a result of Owner’s providing incomplete or incorrect Specific Project information to Engineer. 8. Providing renderings or models for Owner’s use, including development, management, and other services in support of building information modeling or civil integrated management. 9. Undertaking investigations and studies including, but not limited to: a. All-hazards risk assessments and other studies to evaluate the feasibility of enhancing the resiliency of the design; b. detailed consideration of operations, maintenance, and overhead expenses; c. the preparation of feasibility studies (such as those that include projections of output capacity, utility project rates, project market demand, or project revenues) and cash flow analyses, provided that such services are based on the engineering and technical aspects of the Specific Project, and do not include rendering advice regarding municipal financial products or the issuance of municipal securities; d. preparation of appraisals; e. with respect to proprietary systems or processes requiring licensing, providing services necessary to assist Owner in obtaining such licensing. f. detailed quantity surveys of materials, equipment, and labor; and g. audits or inventories required in connection with construction performed or furnished by Owner. 10. Furnishing services of Subconsultants or Engineer’s Subcontractors for other than Basic Services. 11. Providing data or services of the types described in Article 2, when Owner retains Engineer to provide such data or services instead of Owner furnishing the same. 12. Providing the following services: a. Services attributable to more prime construction contracts than specified in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.04.A.1. b. Services to arrange for performance of construction services for Owner by contractors other than the principal prime Contractor, and administering Owner’s contract for such services. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 25 of 26 13. Services during out-of-town travel required of Engineer, other than for visits to the Site or Owner’s office as required in Basic Services (Article 1 of Exhibit A). 14. Preparing for, coordinating with, participating in and responding to structured independent review processes, including, but not limited to, construction management, cost estimating, project peer review, value engineering, and constructability review requested by Owner; and performing or furnishing services required to revise studies, reports, Drawings, Specifications, or other documents as a result of such review processes. 15. Preparing additional bidding-related documents (or requests for proposals or other construction procurement documents); preparing pre-qualification procedures and documents, and participating in pre-qualifying prospective Bidders; and preparing Construction Contract Documents for alternate bids. 16. Assistance in connection with bid protests, rebidding, or renegotiating contracts for construction, materials, equipment, or services. 17. Preparing conformed Construction Contract Documents that incorporate and integrate the content of all addenda and any amendments negotiated by Owner and Contractor. 18. Services to assist Owner in developing or modifying protocols for transmittal of Electronic Documents by Electronic Means after the effective date of this Agreement, either by revising or adapting Exhibit F to the Specific Project or implementing other Electronic Documents protocols among Specific Project participants. 19. Any services by Engineer in connection with Owner or Engineer providing a Document to a Requesting Party under Exhibit F Paragraph 1.01.D (see Exhibit F, Electronic Documents Protocol), or any other distribution of a Document to a third party. Such services may include but are not limited to preparing the data contained in the requested Document in a manner deemed appropriate by Engineer; creating or otherwise preparing and distributing the Document in a format necessary to respond to Owner’s direction or decision to provide the Document to a requesting party, including Contractor, in a format other than that required for deliverables from Engineer to Owner; and services in connection with obtaining required releases from the third parties to which the Documents will be distributed. Compensation for these Additional Services is not contingent upon Owner’s reimbursement from the requesting party. 20. Providing Construction Phase services beyond the original date for completion and readiness for final payment of Contractor, but only if such services increase the total quantity of services to be performed in the Construction Phase, rather than merely shifting performance of such services to a later date. 21. Preparing Record Drawings, and furnishing such Record Drawings to Owner. 22. Supplementing Record Drawings with information regarding the completed Specific Project, Site, and immediately adjacent areas obtained from field observations, Owner, utility companies, and other reliable sources. 23. Conducting surveys, investigations, and field measurements to verify the accuracy of Record Drawing content obtained from Contractor, Owner, utility companies, and other sources; revise and supplement Record Drawings as needed. Exhibit A—Engineer’s Services Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 26 of 26 24. Preparation of operation, maintenance, and staffing manuals. 25. Protracted or extensive assistance in refining and adjusting of Specific Project equipment and systems (such as initial startup, testing, and balancing). 26. Assistance to Owner in training Owner’s staff to operate and maintain Specific Project equipment and systems. 27. Assistance to Owner in developing systems and procedures for (a) control of the operation and maintenance of Specific Project equipment and systems, and (b) related recordkeeping. 28. Preparing to serve or serving as a consultant or witness for, or producing documents for or on behalf of, Owner in any litigation, arbitration, mediation, lien or bond claim, or other legal or administrative proceeding involving the Specific Project (but not including disputes between Owner and Engineer). 29. Overtime work requiring higher than regular rates. 30. Providing construction surveys and staking to enable Contractor to perform its work other than as required under Exhibit A Paragraph 1.06.B.9; any type of property surveys or related engineering services needed for the transfer of interests in real property; providing construction and property surveys to replace reference points or property monuments lost or destroyed during construction; and providing other special field surveys. 31. Providing more extensive services required to enable Engineer to issue notices or certifications requested by Owner. 32. Extensive services required during any correction period, or with respect to monitoring Contractor’s compliance with warranties and guarantees called for in the Construction Contract (except as agreed to under Basic Services). 33. Other additional services performed or furnished by Engineer not otherwise provided for in this Agreement. Exhibit B—Task Order Deliverables Schedule. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 2 EXHIBIT B—TASK ORDER DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE Paragraphs 2.04.E, 3.02.A, and Exhibit A of the Main Agreement are supplemented by the following paragraph and table. Under the governing Task Order the Engineer shall furnish Documents to Owner as required in Column 2 of the following table (and as further described in Exhibit A), according to the schedule in Column 4. Owner shall comment or take other identified actions with respect to the Documents as indicated in Column 2 (and as further described in Exhibit A), according to the schedule in Column 4. Party Action Exhibit A Reference Schedule Engineer Submit one (1) review copies of the Preliminary Design Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables to Owner. 1.03.B.17 Within 70 days of Owner’s authorization to proceed with Preliminary Design Phase services. Owner Submit comments regarding Preliminary Design Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables to Engineer. 1.03.B.18 Within 10 days of the receipt from Engineer of Preliminary Design Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables. Engineer Submit one (1) copies of the revised Preliminary Design Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables to Owner. 1.03.B.18 Within 5 days of the receipt of Owner’s comments regarding the Preliminary Design Report, opinion of probable Construction Cost, and other Preliminary Design Phase deliverables. Engineer Submit one (1) copy of the first Final Design Phase draft of Drawings and Specifications to Owner. 1.04.B.1 Within 30 days of Owner’s authorization to proceed with Final Design Phase services. Owner Submit comments and instructions regarding the first Final Design Phase draft of Drawings and Specifications to Engineer. 1.04.B.1 Within 15 days of the receipt of the first final Design Phase drafts of Drawings and Specifications from Engineer. Engineer Submit one (1) copies of the final, completed, pricing-ready and construction-ready Drawings and Specifications to Owner. 1.04.B.3 and 1.04.G.1 Within 30 days of the receipt of Owner’s comments and instructions regarding the second Final Design Phase drafts of Drawings and Specifications. Owner Submit comments and instructions regarding the final, completed, pricing-ready and construction- ready Drawings and Specifications to Engineer. 1.04.G.2 Within 10 days of the receipt from Engineer of the final, completed, pricing-ready and construction-ready Drawings and Specifications. Owner Submit comments and instructions regarding drafts of Bidding/Proposal and Front-End Construction Contract Documents, and any other Final Design Phase deliverables (other than Drawings and Specifications) to Engineer. 1.04.D.3; 1.04.F.8 Concurrent with Owner’s submittal of comments and instructions regarding the final, completed, pricing-ready and construction-ready Drawings and Specifications. Exhibit B—Task Order Deliverables Schedule. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 2 Party Action Exhibit A Reference Schedule Engineer Submit to Owner: One (1) copies of the revised final, completed, pricing-ready and construction-ready Drawings and Specifications; and One (1) copies of assembled Bidding/Proposal and Front-End Construction Contract Documents, and any other Final Design Phase deliverables. 1.04.G.2; 1.04.G.3 Within 5 days of receipt of Owner’s final comments and instructions regarding the regarding the final, completed, pricing-ready and construction-ready Drawings and Specifications, the Bidding/Proposal and Front-End Construction Contract Documents, and any other Final Design Phase deliverables. Engineer Submit One (1) copies of Bidding/Proposal Phase deliverables (if any) identified in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.05.A.9.a to Owner. 1.05.A.9.a Within 5 days of written authorization by Owner to proceed with Bidding/Proposal Phase services. Exhibit C—Reserved. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT C—RESERVED Guidance Notes—Exhibit C 1. See Exhibit C—Amendment to Main Agreement, in E-505 Part 2 of 4: Exhibits to Main Agreement. Exhibit D—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT D—DUTIES, RESPONSIBILITIES, AND LIMITATIONS OF AUTHORITY OF RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE UNDER TASK ORDER ARTICLE 1—RESIDENT PROJECT REPRESENTATIVE SERVICES Article 1 of the Main Agreement, Services of Engineer, and Exhibit A, Engineer's Services Under Task Order, are supplemented to include Exhibit D Paragraphs 1.01, 1.02, and 1.03, as follows: 1.01 Resident Project Representative A. Engineer shall furnish a Resident Project Representative ("RPR") to observe progress and quality of the Work. RPR is Engineer's representative at the Site, will act as directed by and under the supervision of Engineer, and will confer with Engineer regarding RPR's actions. B. The RPR will provide full-time representation [revise if representation will be less than full time]. C. Subject to the scope of RPR's observations of the Work, which may include field checks of materials and installed equipment, Engineer shall endeavor to identify defects and deficiencies in the Work. However, Engineer shall not, as a result of such RPR observations of the Work, supervise, direct, inspect, or have control over the Work, nor shall Engineer (including the RPR) have authority over or responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, or procedures of construction selected or used by any Constructor, for security or safety at the Site, for safety precautions and programs incident to the Work or any Constructor's work in progress, for the coordination of the Constructors' work or schedules, or for any failure of any Constructor to comply with Laws and Regulations applicable to the performing and furnishing of its work. The Engineer (including RPR) neither guarantees the performance of any Constructor nor assumes responsibility for any Constructor's failure to furnish and perform the Work, or any portion of the Work, in accordance with the Construction Contract Documents. In addition, the specific terms set forth in Exhibit A Paragraph 1.06 are applicable. 1.02 Duties and Responsibilities of RPR A. The duties and responsibilities of the RPR are as follows: 1. General: RPR's dealings in matters pertaining to the Work in general will be with Contractor. RPR's dealings with Subcontractors shall only be through or with the full knowledge and approval of Contractor. RPR shall generally communicate with Owner only with the knowledge of and under the direction of Engineer. 2. Schedules: Review the progress schedule, schedule of Shop Drawing and Sample submittals, schedule of values, and other schedules prepared by Contractor and consult with Engineer concerning acceptability of such schedules. 3. Conferences and Meetings: Attend meetings with Contractor, such as preconstruction conferences, progress meetings, job conferences, and other Project-related meetings (but not including Contractor's safety meetings), and as appropriate prepare and circulate copies of minutes thereof. Exhibit D—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2 of 5 4. Safety Compliance: Comply with Site safety programs, as they apply to RPR, and if required to do so by such safety programs, receive safety training specifically related to RPR's own personal safety while at the Site. 5. Liaison a. Serve as Engineer's liaison with Contractor. Working principally through Contractor's authorized representative or designee, assist in providing information regarding the provisions and intent of the Construction Contract Documents. b. Assist Engineer in serving as Owner's liaison with Contractor when Contractor's operations affect Owner's on-Site operations. c. Assist in obtaining from Owner additional details or information, when required for proper execution of the Work. 6. Clarifications and Interpretations: Receive from Contractor submittal of any matters in question concerning the requirements of the Construction Contract Documents (sometimes referred to as requests for information or interpretation—RFIs), or relating to the acceptability of the Work under the Construction Contract Documents. Report to Engineer regarding such RFIs. Report to Engineer when clarifications and interpretations of the Construction Contract Documents are needed, whether as the result of a Contractor RFI or otherwise. Transmit Engineer's clarifications, interpretations, and decisions to Contractor. 7. Shop Drawings, Samples, and other Submittals a. Receive Samples that are furnished at the Site by Contractor. b. Receive Contractor-approved Shop Drawings. c. Receive other Submittals from Contractor. d. Record date of receipt of Samples, Contractor-approved Shop Drawings, and other Submittals. e. Notify Engineer of availability of Samples for examination, and forward Contractor- approved Shop Drawings and other Submittals to Engineer. When appropriate recommend distribution of Submittal to specified Subconsultants. f. Advise Engineer and Contractor of the commencement of any portion of the Work requiring a Shop Drawing or Sample submittal, if RPR believes that the submittal has not been received from Contractor, or has not been approved by Contractor or Engineer. 8. Proposed Modifications: Consider and evaluate Contractor's suggestions for modifications to the Drawings or Specifications, and report such suggestions, together with RPR's recommendations, if any, to Engineer. Transmit Engineer's response (if any) to such suggestions to Contractor. 9. Review of Work; Defective Work a. Report to Engineer whenever RPR believes that any part of the Work is defective under the terms and standards set forth in the Construction Contract Documents, and provide recommendations as to whether such Work should be corrected, Exhibit D—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 3 of 5 removed and replaced, or accepted as provided in the Construction Contract Documents. b. Inform Engineer of any Work that RPR believes is not defective under the terms and standards set forth in the Construction Contract Documents, but is nonetheless not compatible with the design concept of the completed Project as a functioning whole, and provide recommendations to Engineer for addressing such Work. c. Advise Engineer of that part of the Work that RPR believes should be uncovered for observation, or requires special testing, inspection, or approval. 10. Inspections, Tests, and System Start-ups a. Consult with Engineer in advance of scheduled inspections, tests, and systems start-ups. b. Verify that tests, equipment, and systems start-ups and operating and maintenance training are conducted in the presence of appropriate Owner's personnel, and that Contractor maintains adequate records thereof. c. Observe, record, and report to Engineer appropriate details relative to the test procedures and systems start-ups. d. Observe whether Contractor has arranged for inspections required by Laws and Regulations, including but not limited to those to be performed by public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Work. e. Accompany visiting inspectors representing public or other agencies having jurisdiction over the Work, record the results of these inspections, and report to Engineer. f. Nothing in this Agreement will be construed to require RPR to conduct inspections. 11. Records a. Maintain at the Site orderly files for correspondence, reports of job conferences, copies of Construction Contract Documents including all Change Proposals, Change Orders, Field Orders, Work Change Directives, Addenda, additional Drawings issued subsequent to the execution of the Construction Contract, RFIs, Engineer's clarifications and interpretations of the Construction Contract Documents, progress reports, approved Shop Drawing and Sample submittals, and other Project-related documents. b. Prepare a daily report or keep a diary or log book, recording Contractor's hours on the Site, Subcontractors present at the Site, weather conditions, data relative to questions of Change Proposals, Change Orders, Field Orders, Work Change Directives, or changed conditions, Site visitors, deliveries of equipment or materials, daily activities, decisions, observations in general, and specific observations in more detail as in the case of observing test procedures; and send copies to Engineer. c. Upon request from Owner to Engineer, photograph or video Work in progress or Site conditions. Exhibit D—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 5 d. Record and maintain accurate, up-to-date lists of the company names and points of contact for Contractors, Subcontractors, and major Suppliers of materials and equipment. e. Maintain records for use in preparing Project documentation. f. Upon completion of the Work, furnish original set of all RPR Project documentation to designated recipients. 12. Reports a. Furnish periodic reports as required of progress of the Work and of Contractor's compliance with the progress schedule and schedule of Shop Drawing and Sample submittals. b. Draft responses to or make recommends on Change Proposals, Change Orders, Work Change Directives, and Field Orders. Obtain backup material from Contractor. c. Furnish to Engineer and Owner copies of all inspection, test, and system start-up reports. d. Immediately inform appropriate parties of the occurrence of any Site accidents, emergencies, natural catastrophes endangering the Work, possible force majeure or delay events, damage to property by fire or other causes, or the discovery of any potential differing site condition or Constituent of Concern. 13. Payment Requests: Review applications for payment with Contractor for compliance with the established procedure for their submission and forward with recommendations to Engineer, noting particularly the relationship of the payment requested to the schedule of values, Work completed, and materials and equipment delivered at the Site but not incorporated in the Work. 14. Certificates, Operation and Maintenance Manuals: During the course of the Work, verify that materials and equipment certificates, operation and maintenance manuals and other data required by the Contract Documents to be assembled and furnished by Contractor are applicable to the items actually installed and in accordance with the Contract Documents, and have these documents delivered to Engineer for review and forwarding to Owner prior to payment for that part of the Work. 15. Completion a. Participate in Engineer's visits to the Site regarding Substantial Completion, assist in the determination of Substantial Completion, and prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Substantial Completion submit a punch list of observed items requiring completion or correction. b. Participate in Engineer's visit to the Site in the company of Owner and Contractor, to determine completion of the Work, and prepare a final punch list of items to be completed or corrected by Contractor. c. Observe whether all items on the final punch list have been completed or corrected, and make recommendations to Engineer concerning acceptance and issuance of the Notice of Acceptability of the Work (Exhibit E). Exhibit D—Duties, Responsibilities, and Limitations of Authority of Resident Project Representative Under Task Order. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 5 1.03 Limitations of Authority A. Resident Project Representative shall not: 1. Authorize any deviation from the Construction Contract Documents or substitution of materials or equipment (including "or-equal" items). 2. Exceed limitations of Engineer's authority as set forth in this Agreement. 3. Undertake any of the responsibilities of Contractor, Subcontractors, or Suppliers, or any Constructor. 4. Advise on, issue directions relative to, or assume control over any aspect of the means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures of the Work, by Contractor or any other Constructor. 5. Advise on, issue directions regarding, or assume control over security or safety practices, precautions, and programs in connection with the activities or operations of Owner or Contractor. 6. Participate in specialized field or laboratory tests or inspections conducted off-site by others except as specifically authorized by Engineer. 7. Accept Shop Drawing or Sample submittals from anyone other than Contractor. 8. Authorize Owner to occupy the Project in whole or in part. Omitted Exhibit E—Notice of Acceptability of Work. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT E—EJCDC® C-626, NOTICE OF ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK (FORM) NOTICE OF ACCEPTABILITY OF WORK (EJCDC® C-626 2018) Owner:Owner’s Project No.: Engineer:Engineer’s Project No.: Contractor:Contractor’s Project No.: Project: Contract Name: Notice Date:Effective Date of the Construction Contract: The Engineer hereby gives notice to the Owner and Contractor that Engineer recommends final payment to Contractor, and that the Work furnished and performed by Contractor under the Construction Contract is acceptable, expressly subject to the provisions of the Construction Contract's Contract Documents ("Contract Documents") and of the Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services dated [date of professional services agreement] ("Owner-Engineer Agreement"). This Notice of Acceptability of Work (Notice) is made expressly subject to the following terms and conditions to which all who receive and rely on said Notice agree: 1. This Notice has been prepared with the skill and care ordinarily used by members of the engineering profession practicing under similar conditions at the same time and in the same locality. 2. This Notice reflects and is an expression of the Engineer's professional opinion. 3. This Notice has been prepared to the best of Engineer's knowledge, information, and belief as of the Notice Date. 4. This Notice is based entirely on and expressly limited by the scope of services Engineer has been employed by Owner to perform or furnish during construction of the Project (including observation of the Contractor's Work) under the Owner-Engineer Agreement, and applies only to facts that are within Engineer's knowledge or could reasonably have been ascertained by Engineer as a result of carrying out the responsibilities specifically assigned to Engineer under such Owner-Engineer Agreement. 5. This Notice is not a guarantee or warranty of Contractor's performance under the Construction Contract, an acceptance of Work that is not in accordance with the Contract Documents, including but not limited to defective Work discovered after final inspection, nor an assumption of responsibility for any failure of Contractor to furnish and perform the Work thereunder in accordance with the Contract Documents, or to otherwise comply with the Contract Documents or the terms of any special guarantees specified therein. 6. This Notice does not relieve Contractor of any surviving obligations under the Construction Contract, and is subject to Owner's reservations of rights with respect to completion and final payment. Engineer By (signature): Name (printed): Title: Exhibit F—Reserved. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT F—RESERVED Guidance Notes—Exhibit F 1. See Exhibit F—Electronic Documents Protocol (EDP), in E-505 Part 2 of 4: Exhibits to Main Agreement. Exhibit G—Reserved. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT G—RESERVED Guidance Notes—Exhibit G 1. See Exhibit G—Insurance, in E-505 Part 2 of 4: Exhibits to Main Agreement. Exhibit H—Reserved. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT H—RESERVED Guidance Notes—Exhibit H 1. See Exhibit H—Dispute Resolution, in E-505 Part 2 of 4: Exhibits to Main Agreement. Exhibit I—Reserved. Exhibits to Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services—Task Order Edition. Copyright© 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 1 EXHIBIT I—RESERVED Guidance Notes—Exhibit I 1. See Exhibit I—Limitations of Liability, in E-505 Part 2 of 4: Exhibits to Main Agreement. CITY OF SCHERTZ BOENIG DRIVE RECONSTRUCT PRELIMINARY CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE 12/19/2024 OVERALL PROJECT ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 1410 TPDES -STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN LS 1 3%$116,655.49 1502 MOBILIZATION LS 1 10%$388,851.64 1555 TRAFFIC CONTROL AND REGULATION LS 1 3%$116,655.49 STREET ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL COST 2221.1 REMOVE ASPHALT SURFACE SY 11048 $6.00 $66,288.00 2221.4 REMOVE SIDEWALK AND DRIVEWAY SF 880 $30.00 $26,400.00 2221.8 REMOVAL OF CURB AND GUTTER LF 70 $5.00 $350.00 2741.1 HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT, TYPE D (3") (PG 64-22)TON 2735 $120.00 $328,200.00 2741.2 HOT MIX ASPHALT PAVEMENT, TYPE B (6") (PG 64-22)TON 6083 $120.00 $729,960.00 LIME STABILIZED SUBGRAE SY 18434 $8.00 $147,472.00 LIME TON 249 $229.00 $56,988.71 2743 TACK COAT GAL 273.5 $5.00 $1,367.50 2754.1 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY (RESIDENTIAL)SY 30 $150.00 $4,500.00 2771 CONCRETE CURB LF 8500 $30.00 $255,000.00 2775 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SY 890 $92.00 $81,880.00 2922 BERMUDA SODDING SY 2833 $12.00 $33,996.00 2922 TOPSOIL CY 314 $44.00 $13,816.00 SUP-1 BOX CULVERT - 8-FT X 6-FT LF 180 $878.00 $158,040.00 SUP-2 CONCRETE HEADWALL/WINGWALL CY 2 $20,000.00 $40,000.00 $1,944,258.21 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION SUB TOTAL $2,566,420.84 CONTINGENCY (10%)$384,963.13 PROJECT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL $2,951,383.96 UNINTECH CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. THE ESIMATED CONSTRUCTION COST IS PRELIMINARY AND IS NOT BASED ON DESIGN OR FIELD SURVEY, AND SHOULD BE USED ONLY AS A GUIDE. ACTUAL UNIT PRICES, QUANTITIES, AND TOTALS MAY BE SIGNFICANTLY DIFFERENT 1 Agenda No. 9.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Facility & Fleet Subject:Resolution 25-R-009 - Authorizing an expenditure with SAMES Bastrop Ford for the acquisition of 7 police vehicles (B.James/D.Hardin/C.Hernandez) BACKGROUND This resolution authorizes the City to spend up to $347,900 for seven 2025 Ford Police Interceptors. These vehicles are to be used by the School Resource Officers. Per the current Interlocal Agreement (ILA) between SCUCISD and the City of Schertz, which was approved by the City Council through Resolution 24-R-64, SCUCISD will reimburse the City of Schertz over a 5-year period for each asset purchased. Since the change in State Law that led to an increase in the number of School Resource Offices required per the ILA, the Police Department has successfully filled all 7 positions and now requires the vehicles. City staff have identified the vehicles and can have them purchased and delivered within 30 to 45 days. GOAL To authorize the City Manager to execute the purchase orders for the purchase of the 7 police vehicles to be used by SCUCISD School Resource Officers  in accordance with SCUCISD and City of Schertz ILA which was approved by City Council under Resolution 24-R-64.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT Approval of Resolution 25-R-009 will enable City of Schertz School Resource Officers to better fulfill their roles in serving the community.  SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 25-R-009 will allow the purchase of 7 police vehicles to fulfill the SRO positions authorized between the City of Schertz and SCUCISD ILA which was approved by City Council under Resolution 24-R-64.    FISCAL IMPACT The fiscal impact of this project is $347,900.00. SCUCISD will reimburse the City of Schertz for the cost of these vehicles over a 5-year period. The initial vehicle purchase will be funded through the city’s General Fund, and Finance will present a budget amendment to the Council at a later date. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 25-R-009 Attachments Resolution 25-R-009 with attachment  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-009 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AUTHORIZING EXPENDITURES WITH SAMES BASTROP FORD AND OTHER MATTERS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. WHEREAS, the Schertz Fleet Department has a need to purchase 7 Police Interceptor Units for the use of Schertz PD Officers and WHEREAS, the Schertz Fleet Department has done due diligence in researching what equipment best fits the needs of the departments, to obtain the best pricing/availability, and to provide the best quality of equipment; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has chosen various Group Purchasing Cooperative Vendors, for the purchase the vehicles; and WHEREAS, purchases under the cooperative programs meet the requirements under Subchapter C, Chapter 791.025 of the Texas Government Code, which states that a local government that purchases goods and services under this section satisfies the requirement of the local government to seek competitive bids for the purchase of the goods and services; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to authorize the City Manager to issue Purchase Orders to the awarded vendors. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes expenditures of up to: $347,900.00 with SAMES Bastrop Ford. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this ____ day of _______, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ________________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary EXHIBIT A 25-R-009 Year Description Price Department Co-op Estimated Date of Delivery 2025 2025 Ford Police Interceptor $347,900.00 Police Department TIPS Contract #240901 6/30/2025 Total Expenditures $347,900.00 Hill Country Outdoor Agenda No. 10.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Manager/City Secretary Subject:Ordinance 25-S-005 Adopting a Compensation Schedule and Procedure for the City Council (R.Gutierrez/S.Williams) BACKGROUND On November 5, 2024, Section 4.04 Compensation of the City of Schertz Home Rule Charter was amended as follows: Members of the City Council shall serve with such compensation as determined by the City Council. An increase in compensation shall not be effective for any member of the City Council during the term for which he or she was elected, and the increase was approved in which the increase is effectuated. Payment of expenses incurred in performance of official duty may be approved by the City Council. In light of this change and in an effort to streamline the application of this section of the Charter, I am proposing the following Ordinance outlining a fixed compensation structure for the Mayor and City Councilmembers. Under the current Ordinance, Council pay was previously adjusted according to the CPI-U and implemented on an annual basis. However, the new Charter language clarifies that such increases may only be implemented in a subsequent term of office for each member of the Council. The proposed pay structure establishes a set amount of compensation for the Mayor and Councilmembers based on their term of office. It will be effective for the Mayor, Place 1, and Place 2 in November 2025; Place 3, Place 4, and Place 5 in November 2026; and Place 6 and Place 7 in November 2027. Any future amendments to this Ordinance will be similarly implemented in the subsequent terms for each Councilmember. Current members of the Council will be paid commensurate to the number of terms for which they have been in office. If a person with previous experience as a City of Schertz Councilmember or Mayor is successfully elected as a Councilmember or Mayor, regardless of whether the terms are consecutive or not, he or she will receive credit for each previously completed term and will be paid accordingly. Prior terms of service are interchangeable whether they were as a Councilmember or the Mayor. In the event of a special election or appointment to fill an unexpired term, the annual compensation amount will be prorated. The proposed compensation structure is as follows:    Mayor  Councilmember    Annual  Annual    Compensation  Compensation  1st Term $ 9,000 $ 6,000 2nd Term 11,000 8,000 3rd Term 13,000 10,000 4th & All Subsequent Terms 15,000 12,000 The way in which the Mayor and Councilmembers will be paid will not change under this ordinance. They will continue to be paid on a bi-weekly basis in the same manner as other City employees. Attached for your reference is a Policy Letter issued by City Manager Don Taylor on May 14, 2009, which outlines the current pay structure and processing.   GOAL To streamline the application of Section 4.04 Compensation of the Charter. COMMUNITY BENEFIT To streamline the application of Section 4.04 Compensation of the Charter. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Adopt Ordinance 25-S-005. FISCAL IMPACT There will be no fiscal impact until FY 25-26, since the new compensation amounts will not be implemented until November 2025.  Once implemented, the fiscal impact will be negligible, as the total amount is only marginally higher.   RECOMMENDATION Adopt Ordinance 25-S-005. Attachments Ordinance 25-S-005  Policy Letter - Don Taylor - 5-14-2009  ORDINANCE NO. 25-S-_____ AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING A COMPENSATION SCHEDULE AND AN IMPLEMENTATION PROCEDURE FOR THE CITY COUNCIL, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 4.04 COMPENSATION OF THE CHARTER OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS. WHEREAS, Section 4.04 Compensation of the Schertz City Charter (the “City”) permits the City Council (the “Council”) to determine compensation for its members, including the Mayor and other members of the Council; and WHEREAS, Ordinances 74-G-38 previously provided for compensation for members of the Council for attendance at regular and special meetings of the Council, and such Ordinance was repealed by Ordinance 08-E-29; and WHEREAS, Ordinance 08-G-31 provided that members of the Council be compensated on a monthly basis, annual adjustments be made on January 1 of each year based on the Consumer Price Index, compensation be prorated based on partial months of service, the reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses, and the ability to refuse payment; and WHEREAS, On November 5, 2024, Section 4.04 Compensation of the City of Schertz Home Rule Charter was amended, as follows: Members of the City Council shall serve with such compensation as determined by the City Council. An increase in compensation shall not be effective for any member of the City Council during the term for which he or she was elected, and the increase was approved in which the increase is effectuated. Payment of expenses incurred in performance of official duty may be approved by the City Council. WHEREAS, Considering this change and to streamline the application of Section 4.04 of the Charter, it is desired to adopt a fixed compensation structure for the Mayor and City Councilmembers. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, THAT: Section 1. That the recitals contained in the preamble hereto are hereby found to be true and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 2. The proposed pay structure establishes a set amount of compensation for the Mayor and Councilmembers based on their term of office. It will be effective on the first day of the new term for the Mayor, Place 1, and Place 2 in November 2025; Place 3, Place 4, and Place 5 in November 2026; and Place 6 and Place 7 in November 2027. Any future amendments to this Ordinance will be similarly implemented in the subsequent terms for each Councilmember. Section 3. Current members of the Council will be paid commensurate to the number of terms for which they have been in office. If a person with previous experience as a City of Schertz Councilmember or Mayor is successfully elected as a Councilmember or Mayor, regardless of whether the terms are consecutive or not, he or she will receive credit for each previously completed term and will be paid accordingly. Prior terms of service are interchangeable whether they were as a Councilmember or the Mayor. In the event of a special election or appointment to fill an unexpired term, the annual compensation amount will be prorated. Section 4. The proposed compensation structure is as follows: Section 5.All ordinances of parts of the ordinance in force when the provisions of this Ordinance become effective which are inconsistent or in conflict with the terms and provisions contained in this Ordinance are hereby repealed only to the extent of such conflict. Section 6.Should any part, sentence or phrase of this Ordinance be determined to be unlawful, void or unenforceable, the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance shall not be adversely affected. No portion of this Ordinance shall fail or become inoperative by reason of the invalidity of any other part. All provisions of this Ordinance are severable. Section 7.That it is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 8:This Ordinance shall take effect immediately from and after its passage and any publication requirements. PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED on this 21st day of January 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS ___________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: _____________________________ Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary Agenda No. 11.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject:Resolution 25-R-017 - Establishing a date for a Public Hearing on Amendments to the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and Impact Fees for Water and Wastewater Utilities (B.James/K.Woodlee) BACKGROUND Related to Water and Wastewater Capital Recovery Fees, or Impact Fees - in accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) Chapter 395, the City is required to periodically evaluate land use assumptions (LUA) and capital improvement plans (CIP) to determine if amendments are warranted.  Staff's evaluation of previously adopted LUA and CIP for water and wastewater utilities led to the conclusion that amendments to those documents are recommended.  Subsequent to the updates of the LUA and CIP, updated Impact Fee rates are also recommended. Staff has worked with the City's consultant, Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam, Inc., (LAN) to prepare an updated LUA, CIP, and calculated maximum assessable water and wastewater impact fees.  A final draft of the resulting report is attached.  Workshops and hearings have been held with the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee and a conversation has taken place with Staff and the Economic Development Corporation to garner input on the proposed amendments.  Comments from the CIAC will be presented to City Council and input from others will also be shared. Per the TLGC, prior to adoption of amended LUA, CIP, and Impact Fees, a Public Hearing must be held and notice of the Public Hearing must be published prior to 30 days in advance of the date of the hearing.  The requested action of City Council is approval of the resolution setting the date for the public hearing adopting the amended LUA, CIP, and impact fees for March 18, 2025.  If approved, Staff will arrange publication of the notice prior to February 13, 2025. RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 25-R-017. Attachments Resolution 25-R-017  Draft Public Notice  2024 Impact Fee Report  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-017 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, SETTING A DATE FOR A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AMENDED LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS, CAPTIAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS, AND WATER AND WASTEWATER IMPACT FEES WHEREAS, Chapter 395, Texas Local Government Code, provides procedures for preparing and amending land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees for water and wastewater utilities; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz (the “City”) has determined it necessary to review current plans and fees and consider amendments; and WHEREAS, the City of Schertz has appointed a Capital Improvement Advisory Committee which is charged to advise City Council on such matters; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Schertz desires to schedule a public hearing on proposed amendments to the land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and water and wastewater impact fees in accordance with Chapter 395. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby schedules a public hearing on the land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and water and wastewater impact fees for 6:00 pm, March 18, 2025, at Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz Texas. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this __ day of _________________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) Notice of Public Hearing NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON AMENDMENT OF IMPACT FEES Schertz City Hall 6:00 pm, March 18, 2025 The City Council of the City of Schertz will convene a public hearing on March 18, 2025, at 6:00 pm in City Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas 78154, to consider amendments to land use assumptions, capital improvement plans, and impact fees for water and wastewater. Any member of the public has the right to appear at the public hearing and present evidence for or against the amendments. More information, including the detailed report to be reviewed by the City Council, can be found at Schertz.com. Questions may be directed to Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer (210) 619-1820. City of Schertz 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Report Prepared By: Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc, 215 Mary Avenue, Suite 309 Waco, Texas 76701 254-753-9585 January 2025 TBPE Firm No. 2614 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The City of Schertz (City) contracted Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) to analyze and update the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. This report summarizes the process used to calculate the water and wastewater impact fees for the 2020 – 2030 planning period, which was done in accordance with Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) Section 395. This study included the development of land use assumptions and growth projections, which were used to estimate future water and wastewater demands. Hydraulic models for both the water and wastewater systems were created by LAN based on data obtained from the City and the estimated future demands. The results of these models highlighted areas in both systems with insufficient capacity or would be throughout the planning period. Capital improvement plans for both systems were then developed and broken out into three separate groups: Near Term, 2030, and 2050. Projects included in the 2050 CIP are not eligible to be included in this impact fee update as TLGC Section 395 limits the planning period to 10 years. Estimated costs were developed for each project and can be found in Appendix 29. The 2030 and 2050 costs were multiplied by an average construction inflation factor to ensure estimates accurately captured the project costs in the future. Only the percentage of each project being utilized during the 10-year planning period was included to calculate the total impact fee eligible costs. Additionally, only the projects or portions of projects needed due to growth are included in the total impact fee eligible costs. The increase in Living Unit Equivalents (LUEs) for the water and wastewater system were determined by comparing the flow results from the two hydraulic models to the existing system flows. The City of Schertz is unique in that the water and wastewater Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) do not match exactly, so the increase in LUEs for the two systems are slightly different. To obtain the maximum allowable impact fee for both systems, the total impact fee eligible costs were divided by the respective growth in LUEs. The tables below show this process for each system. Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $65,943,379 Credit (Calculated: 5.1%) ($3,365,530) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $62,577,849 Growth in LUEs 7,100 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee per LUE $8,814 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 1 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $44,707,306 Credit (Calculated: 8.6%) ($4,611,802) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $40,095,504 Growth in LUEs 7,217 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee per LUE $5,556 Part of the update to the impact fees included updating the water meter types and characteristics to correspond with the new meters that the City will now be utilizing. The maximum allowable impact fees by meter type were calculated by multiplying the LUE per meter size by the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees shown in the tables above. The table below reflects both the update to the impact fees by meter type and the new meter characteristics. Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Proposed LUE Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8" MULTI-JET 15 1.0 $8,814 $5,556 3/4" MULTI-JET 20 1.3 $11,810 $7,445 1" MULTI-JET 30 2.0 $17,627 $11,112 2" ULTRASONIC 250 16.7 $146,924 $92,615 3" ULTRASONIC 500 33.3 $293,848 $185,231 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 66.7 $587,607 $370,406 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 106.7 $940,154 $592,639 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 186.7 $1,645,248 $1,037,104 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 ENGINEER’S SEAL & LAN FIRM NO. HERE 01/17/2025 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 2 Table of Contents City of Schertz 2024 Water & Wastewater Master Plan, CIP, & Impact Fee Update ........... 0 1. BACKGROUND & REGULATIONS .............................................................................. 6 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS ......................................................................................... 8 2.1 Data Review & Methodology ............................................................................................. 8 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions ............... 9 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections ................................................................................... 10 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates ........................................................................................... 13 2.5 Future System Modeling ................................................................................................. 14 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP ..................................................................... 15 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System .......................................................... 15 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP .......................................................................... 36 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP......................................................... 49 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System ..................................................................... 49 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation ......................................................................... 58 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs ............................................................... 60 5. IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT .................................................................................. 69 5.1 Living Unit Equivalent ...................................................................................................... 69 5.2 Cost Data ........................................................................................................................ 70 5.3 Inflation Rate Calculation ................................................................................................ 71 5.4 Project Costs Eligibility .................................................................................................... 72 5.5 Water Meter Updates ...................................................................................................... 76 5.6 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees .................................................................................... 77 5.7 Comparison of Local Impact Fees ................................................................................... 80 6. LIST OF APPENDICES .............................................................................................. 81 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 3 List of Tables Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements ................................... 11 Table 2: Population Projections .................................................................................................... 11 Table 3: Housing Projections ........................................................................................................ 11 Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates ....................................................................................... 12 Table 5: Household Size Projections ............................................................................................ 12 Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections ........................................................... 13 Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ...................................................... 15 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands ........................................................... 16 Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System ......................................... 20 Table 10: Well Capacities ............................................................................................................. 23 Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments ................................................................................... 24 Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities .............................................................................................. 24 Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities ............................................................................... 25 Table 14: Pump Capacities .......................................................................................................... 25 Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane.......................... 26 Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane ............................... 28 Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation ......................................................... 31 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation ...................................................................... 33 Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation .............................................................. 34 Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary ....................................................................... 37 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 39 Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 39 Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 39 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 43 Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane ....................................... 44 Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes ..................... 44 Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane ........................................ 44 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary ................................................................................ 48 Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary ............................. 51 Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 53 Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties .............................................................................................. 54 Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions .................................................................................... 54 Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters .......................................................................................... 56 Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results .................................................................................. 57 Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins ........................... 58 Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections ...................................................................................... 60 Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities .................................... 61 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 4 Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities ....................................................................... 61 Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls ................................................ 62 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary ...................................................................................... 63 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 64 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 65 Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary ................................................. 65 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary ................................................................................... 66 Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary ............................................................. 66 Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation .................................................................................... 67 Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation ................................................................................... 68 Table 48: Calculations for Growth in Water LUEs ........................................................................ 69 Table 49: Calculations for Growth in Wastewater LUEs ............................................................... 69 Table 50: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations ................................................................................. 71 Table 51: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 73 Table 52: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 73 Table 53: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs .................................................. 74 Table 54: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ............................... 74 Table 55: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 75 Table 56: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ......................................... 76 Table 57: CCMA 2030 System Improvement Projects Estimate of Probable Costs ..................... 76 Table 58: Existing & Proposed Meter Characteristics ................................................................... 77 Table 59: Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee ........................................................................ 78 Table 60: Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee ............................................................... 79 Table 61: Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size ............................................................ 79 Table 62: Local Impact Fee Comparison ...................................................................................... 80 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 5 List of Figures Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters ................ 17 Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters ................... 17 Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows ...................................................................................................... 18 Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model ........................... 19 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours ................................................. 22 Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours ................................................. 22 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures ............................................................... 27 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures .................................................................... 29 Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations ...................................................................................... 30 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation ................................................................................ 32 Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation ............................................................................................. 33 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation ..................................................................................... 35 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 40 Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels .......................................................................... 40 Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 41 Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels ............................................................................... 41 Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels ........................................................................ 42 Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels ............................................................................ 45 Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels ......................................................................... 45 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels .................................................................. 46 Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls ................................................................................. 46 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels .......................................................................... 47 Figure 24: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System .................................... 50 Figure 25: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern .................................................................................. 52 Figure 26: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot .......................................................................... 52 Figure 27: RTK Method Parameters ............................................................................................. 55 Figure 28: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot ......................................................................... 57 Figure 29: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm ..................................................................................... 59 Figure 30: AACE Cost Estimate Clases ....................................................................................... 70 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 6 1. BACKGROUND & REGULATIONS Texas Local Government Code (TLGC) Section 395 provides provisions to “generate revenue for funding or recouping the costs of capital improvements or facility expansions necessitated by and attributable to the new development”. Impact fees cannot be applied to existing customers. The City of Schertz (City) contracted Lockwood, Andrews, and Newnam Inc. (LAN) to analyze and update the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. This report summarizes the process used to calculate water and wastewater impact fees for the 2020 – 2050 planning period, which was done in accordance with TLGC Section 395. Within Section 395 there are procedures and regulations for adopting and updating water and wastewater impact fees that require an impact fee analysis be performed before the new or updated impact fees can be imposed. In accordance with Section 395, only the following items are payable by the impact fee: · Construction Contract Price · Surveying & Engineering Fees · Land acquisition costs, including land purchases, court awards and costs, attorney’s fees, and expert witness fees. · Fees actually paid or contracted to be paid to an independent qualified engineer or financial consultant preparing or updating the capital improvements plan who is not an employee of the political subdivision. · Projected interest charges and other financing costs may be included in determining the amount of impact fees only if the impact fees are used for the payment of principal and interest on bonds, notes, or other obligations issued by or on behalf of the political subdivision to finance the capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan and are not used to reimburse bond funds expended for facilities that are not identified in the capital improvements plan. Additionally, Section 395 lists the items that are not payable by the impact fee: · Construction, acquisition, or expansion of public facilities or assets other than capital improvements or facility expansions identified in the capital improvements plan. · Repair, operation, or maintenance of existing or new capital improvements or facility expansions. · Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to serve existing development in order to meet stricter safety, efficiency, environmental, or regulatory standards. · Upgrading, updating, expanding, or replacing existing capital improvements to provide better service to existing development. · Administrative and operating costs of the political subdivision, except the Edwards Underground Water District or a river authority that is authorized elsewhere by state law to charge fees that function as impact fees may use impact fees to pay its administrative and operating costs. · Principal payments and interest or other finance charges on bonds or other indebtedness, except as allowed by Section 395.012. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 7 With these regulations in mind, LAN updated the City’s land use assumptions, developed hydraulic water and wastewater models, identified capital improvement projects and their usage attributable to new development, and calculated the updated water and wastewater impact fees. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 8 2. LAND USE ASSUMPTIONS Land use assumptions are required to be periodically updated in accordance with TLGC Section 395.052. These assumptions form the basis for analyzing existing and future water and wastewater needs based on growth projections. This section describes how LAN performed a land use assessment, developed growth projections, and applied this data to the hydraulic water and wastewater models which are discussed later in this report. 2.1 Data Review & Methodology 2.1.1 City Provided Data Data and resources necessary for LAN to assess current and future land uses, development projections, and Water and Wastewater service networks were provided by the City. Sources available up to December 31, 2021 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. The plan was modified based on residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. This includes the following: · GIS Shapefiles o Received by LAN in the December 2019 data package from the City  Shapefiles in this data package included: · Comprehensive Land Use · Zoning Ordinances · Water and Wastewater infrastructure · CCN Service Areas · Municipal Boundaries · Customer Meters · Subdivision Land Use Statistics · Residential Land Use Forecasts o Microsoft excel spreadsheet received by LAN in April 2020 from the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development. · 2018 City of Schertz Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map · 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumption Report by Freese and Nichols, Inc. 2.1.2 AAMPO TAZ Data Alamo Area Metropolitan Planning Organization (AAMPO) Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) demographic databases were used to determine the City’s growth projections. TAZs are the geographic units used to inventory existing and future demographic data required for modeling purposes. TAZ data included 2020, 2025, 2035, and 2045 population, number of households, average household size, and employment inventories for the study area. Databases were downloaded from the AAMPO website in the form of GIS shapefiles and concentrated to correctly reflect the City’s extent. It should be noted that TAZ demographic data from 2020 was provided to LAN separately from the 2025-2045 projected demographic data. Because the 2020 data package was a direct result from the official 2020 Census and the projected data was calculated by AAMPO before 2020, LAN identified discrepancies in growth rates between the years 2020 and 2030 for population and employment. For the purpose of this Land Use Assessment, population and employment data between the years 2020 and 2030 was interpolated to reflect consistent growth rate throughout the 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 9 planning period. LAN has communicated with AAMPO about the data discrepancies and will update all projections accordingly for future system modeling. At the request of City staff, the projected growth rate for each 5-year period was increased by 0.1% to be conservative. These adjusted population numbers are presented in subsequent sections. 2.1.3 Planning Period This Comprehensive Land Use Assessment utilizes a 30-year planning period from 2020 to 2050. Because the AAMPO TAZ demographic data is limited to the year 2045, demographics were projected to 2050 by assuming the same compound annual growth rate (CAGR) established in 2045. 2.2 Summary of Comprehensive Land Use and Future Development Assumptions 2.2.1 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions by Freese and Nichols, Inc. The 2017 Roadway Impact Fee Land Use Assumptions Report identified land use assumptions and recommendations for the City over a 10-year planning period ending in 2027. Upon completion of this 2021 Comprehensive Land Use Assessment, LAN has identified that the following assumptions from the 2017 Report will remain true for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050: · Territories south of Randolph Air Force Base are impacted by restrictions based on Air Impact Compatible Use Zones (shown on the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map as Attachment 1). Restrictions include limits on residential development densities. · Continued commercial and residential development pressure in the North from New Braunfels will impact growth around the City. 2.2.2 Assumptions Made by LAN A series of assumptions in relation to the City’s land use and future development have been made by LAN after completing this Land Use Assessment. The following assumptions were made to initiate updates to the water master plan and CIP: · Land uses identified in the 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map were modified based on updated residential subdivision development information received from the City on April 8th, 2022. It is assumed that these developments will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. The names and location of these updated developments are labeled on Appendix 5 and Appendix 6. · Land use data available up to April 8th, 2022 were incorporated in the land use assumptions for this master plan effort. · New growth throughout the 30-year planning period will expand away from the City center, where the highest densities of development currently exist. · Continued development pressure in the North along the IH-35 corridor and from New Braunfels will result in future residential and commercial development at higher densities throughout the north, than in the south. · Territories under delayed annexation agreements with the City will be annexed by 2025. The annexation of these territories will expand municipal boundaries. · Regions within Municipal Boundaries that do not currently lie within City water or wastewater Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCN)s identified by the Public Utilities 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 10 Commission (PUC) are serviced by other authorities and will remain so throughout the 30-year planning period. · The existing water and wastewater CCNs will remain in place for the 30-year planning period. 2.3 Land Use and Growth Projections 2.3.1 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan The City’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan Map is included in this report as Appendix 1 and serves as a provisional guideline for future development across the City. The land uses identified in the 2018 map provide a framework that will be reflected by the City’s future development decisions. The exception is the area south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518. Recent land use plan amendments in this area include zoning changes based on data available up to October 1st, 2022. 2.3.2 Zoning The City’s existing zoning ordinances are included in this report as Appendix 2. The existing zoning ordinances were published in 2019 and serve as a means for which the 2018 Comprehensive Future Land Use Plan will be implemented. Based on land use data available up to October 1st, 2022 (including residential subdivision development information received from the City), the 2019 zoning designations were updated. It is assumed for the purposes of this study, that the zoning identified in Attachment 2 will remain in place for the 30-year planning period ending in 2050 apart from areas south of Schaeffer Rd and east of FM 1518 and areas just north of Trainer Hale Rd which are already approved for rezoning as of May 26, 2022. All existing and future subdivisions are shown in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.3 Delayed Annexation Agreements Zoning ordinances were used to locate territories around the City under delayed annexation agreements. Territories under delayed annexation agreements currently exist within zones of Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), which constrain the City’s growth. These territories are primarily located throughout the Northeast corner of the City extending toward New Braunfels and in the Southeast between FM 1518 and IH-10. 2.3.3.1 Annexation Schedule The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with timelines for completing existing annexation agreements. The City Plans for the existing annexations to be completed by 2025. 2.3.3.2 Supported Land Uses of Territories to be An nexed Table 1 summarizes the supported land uses of the territories under delayed annexation agreements. The annexation data provided to LAN was geographically categorized between the north and south. The location of the areas under a delayed annexation agreement is illustrated in Appendix 2 and the supported land uses for future development of these area is presented in Appendix 9 & 10. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 11 Table 1: Land Use of Territories Under Delayed Annexation Agreements Delayed Annexation Agreements: Parcel Land Use Supported Land Uses(1) Total Parcels Total Acreage Single-Family Residential Lots Allowed Commercial Parcels North Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 43 1,037 822 2 South Schertz Commercial, Single-Family Residential 86 3,110 2,000 5 (1)For the purpose of this assessment, single-family residential land use includes Agricultural Conservation, Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND), Transit Oriented Development (TOD), and Estate Neighborhood 2.3.4 Population Projections Table 2 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize population projections over the 30- year planning period ending in 2050. Combining these projections with development anticipated as of October 1st, 2022, Projections suggest that population is expected to steadily increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 1.%. Appendix 3 presents 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) population distribution across the City, reflecting the population increase provided in Table 2. Table 2: Population Projections Population Projections (Cumulative) (1) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate - 1.8% 2.0% 2.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% Population 45,719 49,985 55,187 60,933 66,946 73,553 80,416 Total Increase (+) 4,266 5,202 5,745 6,013 6,607 6,863 (1)Total population accounts for areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2.3.5 Residential Land Use Table 3 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize projections for the total number of households over the 30-year planning period. Future residential development across the City is expected to reflect population growth and increased traffic along IH-35. The number of households is expected to increase throughout the 30-year planning period at an average CAGR of 2.2%. 2020 (historical) and 2050 (projected) residential housing distribution across the City are shown in Appendix 4. Because AAMPO TAZ data does not categorize residence type, the housing projections include both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 3: Housing Projections Housing Projections (Cumulative) Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(1)(2) - 3.2% 2.4% 2.2% 2.1% 2.0% 2.0% Households 15,441 18,034 20,305 22,640 25,120 27,735 30,742 Total Increase (+) 2,593 2,271 2,335 2,480 2,615 2,737 (1)Total number of households accounts for all categories of residential housing units throughout the City (2)Total number of households accounts for all residential housing units located within areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 12 The City’s Director of Planning and Community Development provided LAN with maximum build- out estimates for existing and planned single-family and multi-family residential developments throughout the City. Appendix 5 & 6 shows the location and density of these subdivisions in comparison to the Wastewater and Water Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCNs) service areas. Appendix 5 & 6 serves as an exhibit of where the City is allowed to provide services and where their population may be distributed. Table 4 summarizes the maximum build-out estimates. According to this data, approximately 90% of the existing and planned residential developments are single-family residential. Table 4: Maximum Build-Out Estimates Residential Type Land Use Statistics Single-Family Multi-Family Number of Households Expected at Maximum Build-Out for Existing and Planned Subdivisions(2) 20,102 3,339 (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2.3.5.1 Single-Family Residential Development The Comprehensive Land Use Plan indicates that single-family is the primary type of residential land use throughout the City. Over the 30-year planning period, development pressure along IH-35 and from New Braunfels will impact the distribution of residences across the City. Single-family housing density is expected to be higher in the north throughout this corridor. However, in the southern portion of the City, west of FM 1518, residential development will primarily consist of lower density rural and estate style subdivisions. It is anticipated that additional single-family development will occur east of FM 1518 based on recent requested and authorized zoning changes. 2.3.5.2 Multi-Family Residential Development Currently, multi-family residential establishments are located centrally in the City and account for a small percentage of the City’s residential type land uses. While the number single-family residences will continue to dominate over the 30-year planning period, data provided by the City’s Director of Planning and Community Development notes a few new multi-family residential subdivisions have been planned. These developments are primarily located in the northeast between IH-35 and the Schertz City Limits, with one in the southern portion of the City. The location and density of these three developments are included in Appendix 5 & 6. 2.3.5.3 Average Household Size Table 5 uses AAMPO TAZ demographic data to summarize the average number of persons per household over the 30-year planning period. Because AAMPO TAZ data did not categorize residence type, household size accounts for both single-family and multi-family residences. Table 5 indicates the average household size will remain close to three persons over the 30-year planning period. Table 5: Household Size Projections Average Household Size Historical 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-Year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Persons(1)(2) 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.7 2.6 (1)All categories of residential housing throughout the City are accounted for (2)Total number of households includes subdivisions in areas of existing ETJ for which growth is constrained 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 13 2.3.6 Commercial Land Use The Comprehensive Land Use Plan implies that commercial type land uses will continue to exist primarily along major thoroughfares in the north surrounding IH-35, in the south surrounding IH-10, and centrally surrounding FM 3009. The number and location of existing and planned commercial-type parcels were provided by the City in the form of a GIS Shapefile, shown in Appendix 7 & 8. These exhibits show the Wastewater and Water CCN service areas, respectively, to compare where the City is allowed to provide service to where they can expect commercial development. It was determined that AAMPO TAZ data for the number of persons employed throughout the City could reflect the number of commercial-type establishments. The CAGR for employment was used to project the number of commercial establishments over the 30-year planning period. Table 6 summarizes the employment projections, CAGR, and anticipated number of commercial establishments. Increased traffic and population among the IH-35 corridor could result in a higher demand for commercial property development in the North. Table 6: Employment & Commercial Property Projections Employment Projections (Cumulative) Historical(1) 5-Year 10-Year 15-Year 20-Year 25-Year 30-year 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045 2050 Compound Annual Growth Rate(2) - 0.8% 0.8% 3.0% 2.4% 2.2% 2.2% Persons Employed 21,437 22,363 23,288 24,213 27,305 30,397 33,839 Commercial Parcels 313 327 340 394 445 495 551 Total Increase in Commercial Parcels (+) 14 14 54 50 50 56 (1)Employment and commercial projections include areas of existing Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ), for which growth is constrained 2.4 CCNs Service Area Updates The City’s existing Water and Wastewater certificates of convenience and necessity (CCNs) identified by the Public Utility Commission (PUC) were reviewed to identify areas the City is currently serving as well as resolve where the City may be servicing outside their PUC identified CCN boundaries. Per correspondence on August 11, 2021, it was decided that the current water and wastewater CCN service areas would remain unchanged for the 30-year planning period. This conservative approach would allow the City to monitor potential CCN changes as development occurs and to adapt using the 5-year impact fee cycle in lieu of wholesale CCN change assumptions for the next 30 years. The City is aware that some regions within their municipal City Limits currently exist outside their water and wastewater CCN service areas and will remain under the service of their existing providers throughout the 30-year planning period. Likewise, regions annexed into the City during the 30-year planning period will not be added to the City’s water and wastewater CCN service areas if they are not currently located within the service areas. The existing water and wastewater CCN service areas can be seen in Appendix 9 & 10. These exhibits present the land use categories used in the development of population projection allocations, calculations of future demands, and wastewater loading development. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 14 2.5 Future System Modeling To develop future conditions for water and wastewater system modeling the existing system models will be modified to reflect the assumptions made in this report. Assumptions and projections made for City growth, land uses, and development are used to establish and allocate future demands and supply requirements for the required planning period. In general, the expansion of Municipal Boundaries throughout the planning period will result in City-wide growth and the extension of water and wastewater service networks. Projected residential and commercial development throughout the planning period will produce increased water and wastewater flows. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 15 3. WATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP 3.1 Modeling & Evaluating the Existing Water System This section provides an overview of the existing system model evaluation and the assessment of the results against the TCEQ requirements for system storage capacity, supply, service capacity, and minimum pressure requirements for public water systems. 3.1.1 Updates to Existing System Model LAN built a hydraulic model of the City’s existing water distribution system in Bentley’s WaterGEMS software using data provided by the City. The model and the Technical Memo with model build details and preliminary model verification results for the existing system were presented to the City at a review meeting on September 10, 2020. After the existing water system review meeting on September 10, 2020, the following items were updated in the hydraulic model to better reflect existing conditions: · Wholesale Customer Demands · Residential Water Usage Patterns · Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings · Removal of Waterlines Not in Service 3.1.1.1 Wholesale Customer Demands Meter usage data from the City of Selma and City of Cibolo was provided to LAN by the City and were used to identify average and peak day demands at the wholesale customers’ meters. Average day demands and peak day demands were input into the existing system model at each customer meter location and are summarized in Table 7 and Table 8, respectively. Table 7: Average Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 16 Table 8: Peak Day Wholesale Customer Meter Demands 3.1.1.2 Residential Water Usage Patterns During the review of the existing system model with the City, it was noted that the residential water usage patterns did not reflect the observed peak hour usage for the Schertz water system. With only monthly flow monitoring data available from the City, updated representative average day and peak day water usage patterns for residential customers was developed using an American Water Works Association report. The updated water usage patterns were developed using the 1993 American Water Works Association (AWWA) Residential Water Use Patterns report using data. The City of Norman, Oklahoma was selected to best represent residential water use patterns for the City of Schertz because of similarities in annual precipitation, average seasonal temperatures, and land use. The AWWA report provided separate usage pattern for both single and multi-family land use types and these patterns were used to update the residential and apartment demands in the existing system model. The average day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use were developed using the Norman info provided in the 1993 report. The average to peak multipliers, used to develop the peak day water usage patterns for Single-Family and Multi-Family use, were calculated using the 36 months of billing data provided to LAN by the City. These average to peak multipliers are: · Single-Family = 3.2 · Multi-Family = 2.6 The Single-Family and Multi-Family average day and peak day diurnal curves used in the existing system model are illustrated in Figure 1 and Figure 2, respectively. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 17 Figure 1: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Single-Family Residential Meters Figure 2: Average & Peak Day Diurnal Patterns for Multi-Family Residential Meters 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 18 3.1.1.3 Live Oak Pressure Reducing Valve Settings Comments provided by the City describe that the PRVs separating the Live Oak and I-35 pressure planes do not open under typical average day conditions but do open under peak day conditions. The City indicated that under peak day conditions these valves open around 4:30 am and stay open until around midnight. To simulate these conditions, the assumption was made that, all PRVs were given the same pressure setting. On the Live Oak side of the pressure plane boundary, under peak day conditions, and with all the valves closed, observed pressures at the PRVs averaged 67-psi. Therefore, a pressure setting of 67- psi was tested in the model to see if the PRVs would open during the simulation in the window of time provided by the City. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway is at a lower elevation of 713-ft (approximately 14 feet lower than the other PRVs). It was assumed that it was unlikely to open in tandem with the other four PRVs on this pressure plane boundary. The results showed all PRVs were open during a window of time similar to the one provided by the City, except the PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway as assumed. Flow through the four PRVs that opened throughout a 24-hour EPS peak day scenario at a pressure setting of 67-psi is shown in Figure 3. The PRVs shown in Figure 3 are primarily open between 4:30 am and midnight. The PRV located near the corner of Mare Way and Schertz Parkway was not shown because it did not open at any time during the 24-hour EPS peak day scenario. Figure 3: Live Oak PRV Flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 19 3.1.1.4 Removal of Waterlines Not in Service The waterlines shown in Figure 4 were removed from the existing system model. While the lines are planned, the City reported that these waterline segments designated as “Active” in the waterline shapefile, were not yet in service. They will be included in the future conditions model. Figure 4: Extent of Waterline Segment Removed from Existing System Model 3.1.2 Public Water System Evaluation Criteria To evaluate the City’s existing system model, criteria were developed in accordance with Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) Public Drinking Water Rules and Regulations for Public Water Systems found in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Chapter 290.D. The TCEQ Rules and Regulations provide minimum capacity requirements for public water systems. The rules and regulations effective January 3, 2019 are applied in this analysis. Several of the evaluation criteria are calculated based on the number of connections in the existing system model. The City of Schertz reports 16,434 connections in the existing water system as of December 15, 2020. The City operates their existing water system as three pressure planes, Scenic Hills, I-35, and Live Oak. For the purposes of this evaluation the system will be assessed as one contiguous network because of the interactions between the existing pressure planes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 20 Extended period simulations were performed using Bentley’s WaterGEMS software which provided the tools and results necessary to assess the existing system model according to the TCEQ criteria for the following: · 24-hour Average Day Flow (ADF) · 24-hour Peak Day Flow (PDF) · 48-hour Peak Daily Plus Fire Flow Analysis The key criteria for the City’s existing system are summarized in Table 9. Detailed results for the evaluation criteria are discussed in the order as they appear in Table 9 throughout this section. Table 9: TAC Criteria for the Evaluation of the City's Existing System 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 21 3.1.2.1 Supply & Storage TAC 290.45.a “Sources of supply, both ground and surface, shall have a safe yield capable of supplying the maximum daily demands of the distribution system during extended periods of peak usage and critical hydrologic conditions. The pipelines and pumping capacities to treatment plants or distribution systems shall be adequate for such water delivery. Minimum capacities required are specified in §290.45 (relating to Minimum Water System Capacity Requirements).” A 24-hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario, beginning at midnight, was run for the existing system under peak day conditions. Over the 24-hour simulation, it was observed that both the I-35 elevated storage tank (EST) and the Live Oak ground storage tank (GST) water supply did not recover to at least the same percent full as it was set to at the beginning of the simulation. Figure 5 shows the I-35 EST and Live Oak GST capacities over the 24-hour simulation. In Figure 5, the I-35 EST begins the simulation at 98% capacity and ends the simulation at 20% capacity. Likewise, the Live Oak GST begins the simulation at 83% capacity and ends the simulation at 56% capacity. Because the tanks did not recover by the end of the 24-hour simulation, the run time was lengthened to 48-hours to assess if the tanks recovered by peak hour (5:00 am) and if the decline in tank level continued throughout the second day. Figure 6 shows that neither tank recovers and the Live Oak GST almost drains completely by hour 48. The observed results indicate that the existing system model’s water supply would be incapable of supplying peak day demands for an extended period as stated in TAC 290.45.a. The City did not indicate that they have issues filling the Live Oak EST or GST as severely as seen in the existing system model. A meeting was held to discuss this issue, and additional information about the system and SCADA was provided to LAN. With this information, the model was re-calibrated, and the results more closely reflected what the Live Oak EST and GST were experiencing. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 22 Figure 5: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 24 Hours Figure 6: Live Oak GST & I-35 EST Percent Full Over 48 Hours 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 23 3.1.2.2 Wholesale Supplier Requirements TAC 290.45.e “The following requirements apply to systems which supply wholesale treated water to other public water supplies: Wholesalers must provide enough production, treatment, and service pumping capacity to meet or exceed the combined maximum daily commitments specified in their various obligations.” “… minimum water system capacity requirements shall be determined by calculating the requirements based upon the number of retail customer service connections of that wholesale water supplier, if any, fire flow capacities required by chapter 290.46, and adding that amount to the maximum amount of water obligated or pledged under all wholesale contracts, if required.” The minimum required water supply is of 0.6 gpm per connections. For Schertz’s 16,434 connections this minimum water supply is approximately 9,860 gpm. The combination of water supplies is 10,400 gpm as shown in Table 10. · Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) is the main supply of water to the existing system. Based on monthly flow monitoring data provided by the City, the maximum daily supply (under peak day conditions) for Schertz from SSLGC is approximately 6,800 gpm. · Schertz Wells - There are two Schertz wells which can supply up to 1,800 gpm each. The wells supply water directly to the Nacogdoches EST under peak day conditions. Table 10 summarizes the system’s maximum supply which meets the minimum required capacity for existing conditions. Table 10: Well Capacities The City of Schertz provides water to two wholesale customers, the City of Cibolo and the City of Selma. The wholesale contracts with Cibolo and Selma do not specify maximum daily commitments. · Cibolo - from their wholesale water contracts with the City of Cibolo, the City of Schertz is to supply a combined total of 750 acre-feet of potable water per year, this includes 350 acre- feet of potable water per year designated to the Keli Heights Subdivision. 750 acre-feet per year is approximately 465 gpm. · Selma - from their wholesale water contract with the City of Selma, the City of Schertz is to supply a total of 800 acre-feet of potable water per year. 800 acre-feet per year is approximately 496 gpm. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 24 Table 11 summarizes contracted commitments to wholesale customers. Table 11: Wholesale Water Commitments Under peak day conditions, the existing water system’s current available supply of 10,400 gpm (from Table 10) cannot meet the minimum required supply to the City (9,860 gpm) and its wholesale customers (961 gpm, from Table 11) which totals 10,821 gpm. 3.1.2.3 Total Storage Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must have a total storage capacity of at least 200 gallons per connection.” The minimum required storage capacity, at 200 gallons per connection, for the existing water system is 3,286,800 gallons. There are eight storage tanks within the existing water system: four elevated storage tanks and four ground storage tanks. The combined total capacity of the storage tanks is 8,500,000 gallons, meeting the minimum storage capacity requirement. Table 12 summarizes storage tank capacities. Table 12: Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.4 Elevated Storage Tank Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For more than 250 connections, the system must meet the following requirements: Have an elevated storage tank capacity of 100 gallons per connection or a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection. An elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection is required for systems with more than 2,500 connections.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required EST capacity, at 100 gallons per connection, is 1,643,400 gallons. There are four ESTs within 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 25 the existing water system with a combined storage capacity of 4,000,000 gallons, meeting the minimum required EST capacity. Table 13 summarizes the existing water system elevated storage tank maximum capacities. Table 13: Elevated Storage Tank Capacities 3.1.2.5 Pumping Capacity TAC 290.45.b “For systems which provide an elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, two service pumps with a minimum combined capacity of 0.6 gpm per connection are required at each pump station or pressure plane. If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required.” Based upon the number of connections in the existing water system, the minimum required elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is 3,286,800 gallons. Schertz currently has 4,000,000 gallons of elevated storage within their system. Therefore, the minimum pumping capacity for the City is 0.6 gpm per connection based on the requirements. The minimum required combined pumping capacity for the existing water system, at 0.6 gpm per connection, is 9,860 gpm. There are four pump stations within the existing water system housing a total of 13 pumps. Table 14 summarizes the capacities of the 13 existing water system pumps. The maximum total pumping capacity of the pumps is 23,600 gpm, meeting the minimum required capacity. The firm pump capacity (with the largest pump out of service is 20,800 gpm which also meets the minimum capacity. Table 14: Pump Capacities 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 26 3.1.2.6 System Minimum Pressures TAC 290.44.d “… capable of providing a minimum pressure of at least 35-psi at all points within the distribution network” In coordination with the City, LAN made assumptions about the existing water system for the hydraulic model where data was limited. While the model indicates operations concerns in the water system, these should be field verified by the City. The existing system under peak day and average day conditions was evaluated in the model using a 24-hour EPS to observe system wide minimum pressures. The TCEQ required minimum pressure of 35-psi at all points within the distribution network applies to normal operating conditions (e.g. no fire flow or line breaks) and is used as the benchmark for assessing the observed pressures for peak day and average day conditions in the existing system model. Average Day Conditions Without detailed pressure readings across the service area, the existing system model can be used to approximate a system pressure. While the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi, the results from the existing system model indicate pressure concerns under average day conditions in some areas. Observed minimum system pressures under average day conditions are summarized in Table 15. Figure 7 illustrates the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under average day conditions. Table 15: Average Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 27 Figure 7: Average Day Conditions Minimum Pressures While minimum pressures in the existing system model indicated flows approximately 1-psi below the minimum required pressure of 35-psi at the intersection of Ware Seguin Road and the Ware Seguin Plant and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST, the pressures were significantly above the emergency operations threshold of 20-psi. This is a small deviation and indicates additional data collection, and analysis should be conducted by the City for verification of operations. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 28 The Ware Seguin Plant low pressures occur near the end of the model day and could be related to the storage/capacity issues referenced above. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. Peak Day Conditions Under peak day conditions, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 35-psi. This is illustrated on Figure 8 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing water system under peak day demand conditions. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed, along Ware Seguin Road and near the I-35 EST at Pecan Street. The I-35 EST area low pressures occur near mid-day and could be related to demand patterns used in place of detailed Schertz demand data. These locations are noted on Figure 8. Pressures were below the required 35-psi minimum, as well as the below the 20-psi emergency operations minimum along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. There are two factors driving the low pressure at this location, first its elevation is higher than the surrounding area by approximately 40-ft and, second, at 5 am when this low pressure occurs, the peak residential demand overlaps with irrigation demand from the HOA meters in the residential subdivisions immediately to the northeast and southwest. These low-pressure results indicate additional data collection, and analysis should be prioritized. Observed minimum system pressures under peak day conditions are summarized in Table 16. Table 16: Peak Day Minimum Pressures Observed in Each Pressure Plane 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 29 Figure 8: Peak Day Conditions Minimum Pressures 3.1.2.7 Fire Flows TAC 290.44.d. “When the system is intended to provide firefighting capability, it must also be designed to maintain a minimum pressure of 20-psi under combined fire and drinking water flow conditions.” For conservative modeling purposes, the existing water system was evaluated for three separate peak day plus fire flow scenarios (one in each pressure plane) to observe any potential interaction between the pressure planes. Fire Flow simulations were run at a commercial meter selected to provide “worst case” scenarios within each pressure plane. These specific locations for fire flows 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 30 in each pressure plane were selected because its commercial meter was at a higher elevation than other commercial meter locations in the pressure plane and were not close in proximity to an elevated storage tank or pump station. A representative Fire Flow demand of 3,500 gpm was placed at the selected meter during the corresponding simulation. Simulating worst case scenario fire flow conditions for each pressure plane provides an analysis of how the pressure planes interact while under critical conditions. The selected locations for each simulation are shown in Figure 9. Fire Flow simulations were set to occur from 7 am to 10 am under peak day conditions. This creates a “worst case” condition where the fire flow occurs during peak hour. Figure 9: Fire Flow Simulation Locations 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 31 The Scenic Hills Fire Flow simulation was placed off I-35 at a commercial meter south of Baugh Lane. For the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road, surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant, and at high elevations adjacent to the I-35 EST. These locations are noted on Figure 10 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the Scenic Hills Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 17. Table 17: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Scenic Hills Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 32 Figure 10: Scenic Hills Fire Flow Simulation The I-35 Fire Flow simulation was placed near the intersection of I-35 and FM 3009 at a commercial meter adjacent to Corridor Parkway. For the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the system does meet the minimum 20-psi. However, there were locations in the existing system model where pressures below the minimum requirement were observed. The observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi at high elevations along Ware Seguin Road and surrounding the Ware Seguin Plant. These locations are noted on Figure 11 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. This minimum pressure is a small deviation and systematically observed through non-fire flow conditions. It indicates additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 18. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 33 Table 18: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow I-35 Simulation Figure 11: I-35 Fire Flow Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 34 The Live Oak Fire Flow simulation was located at a commercial meter approximately 0.6 miles west of the intersection of I-10 and FM 1518. For the Live Oak Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation, the majority of the I-35 and Scenic Hills Pressure Planes do meet the minimum 20-psi. However, the observed system minimum pressures fell below the minimum required pressure of 20-psi across the majority of the Live Oak Pressure Plane south of FM 78. These locations are noted on Figure 12 which summarizes the observed minimum system pressures across the existing system model under Peak Day plus Fire Flow conditions. These results indicate additional data collection, and analysis is needed. Observed minimum system pressures for the I-35 Peak Day plus Fire Flow simulation are summarized in Table 19. Table 19: Peak Day Plus Fire Flow Live Oak Simulation 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 35 Figure 12: Live Oak Flre Flow Simulation 3.1.3 Recommendations For the TAC Criteria where the model did not demonstrate that the minimum criteria was met, it is recommended that the City take steps to verify the behavior of the water system in the field. This section presents the steps the City can take to verify the model observations. 3.1.3.1 System Storage & Supply Although the system meets the minimum total storage capacity, the existing system model results indicated that the system cannot supply peak day demands for an extended period of time. It is recommended that the City perform pressure and flow monitoring at all pump stations and ESTs concurrently for two weeks during a peak day period (e.g., Mid-August) to verify behavior of the water system under these conditions. It is LAN’s understanding that a second supply connection from the SSLGC will be connected to the proposed Corbett EST (located near the east dead end of Ray Corbett Dr.). This additional supply location and EST will be assessed in the Future System Evaluation effort. These future 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 36 conditions results will be considered when developing the final recommendations for storage and supply of the City’s water system. 3.1.3.2 System Minimum Pressure Requirements Because pressures below the minimum requirements for the average day, peak day, and peak day plus fire scenarios were observed in the existing system model, it is recommended that the City perform pressure monitoring at the locations were these low pressures were observed at the same time that the peak day period flow and pressure monitoring at the pump stations and ESTs is being performed. It is recommended that the data recording equipment used be set to record pressure and flow readings at least every 15-minutes. 3.1.4 Summary The results from this existing system evaluation were used to develop preliminary infrastructure and operational recommendations for near-term and future system improvements. These recommendations, in conjunction with currently planned improvements, are assessed in the future system evaluation and used in the development of the Capital Improvements Plan. Preliminary recommendation alternatives under consideration are (but not limited to): · Increase in water supply · Increased pumping capacity · Increased storage capacity · Changes to pump operating pressure controls or schedules 3.2 Future Water System Evaluation & CIP The following information, criteria, and constraints were used to identify and develop proposed water system improvement projects. · City direction for projects already in planning, design, and construction · Minimum pipe size of 8-inches · Minimum normal system pressure of 45 psi 3.2.1 Near Term System Evaluation Before proceeding to model future scenarios, the system was analyzed to identify improvements needed to solve present day system issues. This analysis is referred to as ‘near-term’ system improvements and accounts for projects which are currently under design or construction and other projects identified in the analysis to resolve existing system deficiencies. The near-term system water model was developed based on the existing conditions model previously developed. Projects which are currently in various stages of design and construction were provided by the City and implemented into the model. After implementing City-identified projects the model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 37 3.2.1.1 Fire Flow Analysis Fire flow analysis of the existing system was performed in the development of the “Existing Water System Model Evaluation” memo published January 2021. Projects to resolve fire flow deficiencies in the existing system were identified in the near-term system evaluation and are included in the recommended Near-Term CIPs and proposed Pipe Replacement Program. 3.2.1.2 Pipe Replacement Program In addition to the recommended CIPs identified in the model evaluation, the City also desires to replace undersized (≤6”) and asbestos-cement (AC) distribution pipes within their system. The undersized distribution pipes are unable to provide fire flow and reduce the system capacity. Undersized pipes are recommended to be upsized to 8” PVC, and the AC pipes greater than or equal to 8” should be replaced with PVC pipes of the same size. Based on the pipe attributes in the hydraulic model, there are approximately 280,460 LF of AC pipe in the system and an additional 175,380 LF of undersized pipe in the system. These pipe replacement programs can be established with a goal to replace a certain amount of pipe per year. A 20-year program would include an average replacement rate of 22,800 LF per year. 3.2.1.3 Near Term CIP Projects Recommended near-term CIPs are listed in Table 20 and illustrated in Appendix 11. Table 20: Near Term Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes System Improvement Projects NT-W1 Bubbling Springs 6” WL Replacement City identified maintenance project. NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), currently underway. NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. NT-W4 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Currently underway. NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab Complete. NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt Currently in design. NT-W7 Graytown to Pfeil Currently underway. NT-W8 FM 78 Water Line Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W9 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W10 Robinhood Way WL Replacement Needed for fire flow. NT-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. NT-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 38 3.2.2 2030 System Evaluation The 2030 planning scenario is the first future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2030 model, the near-term model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2030 project land use. The City identified projects that were not needed until 2030 were implemented in the 2030 model and additional projects were identified to meet the 2030 system needs. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify additional improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2030 projects implemented. 3.2.2.1 TCEQ capacity Analysis An evaluation of the City’s system was performed to determine if the system met the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality’s (TCEQ’s) minimum pumpage and storage requirements as outlined in Chapter §290.45 of the Texas Administrative Code. A summary of the applicable TCEQ minimum requirements is included below. TCEQ’s requirements are based on the raw number of connections, which have been approximated based on the number of connections in the model and City GIS data. TCEQ Minimum Requirements: 1. Well Pump Capacity: Two (2) or more wells having a total capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection. 2. Elevated Storage Capacity: Elevated storage capacity of 100 gallons per connection. 3. Elevated Storage Credit: If elevated storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection is provided, reduced service pumping requirements can be applied as discussed below. 4. Pressure Tank Capacity: For future systems, if elevated storage is not provided, a pressure tank capacity of 20 gallons per connection is required. 5. Total Storage Capacity (elevated and ground storage): Total storage capacity of 200 gallons per connection, inclusive of the 100-gallon minimum requirement listed above. 6. Service Pump Capacity: 6.1 A minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 2.0 GPM per connection, except for systems meeting one of the two requirements below. 6.1.1 For systems that meet the elevated storage credit requirement listed above, a minimum of two (2) pumps with a combined capacity of 0.6 GPM per connection are required for each pump station or pressure plane. 6.1.2 If only wells and elevated storage are provided, service pumps are not required. The City’s existing system is divided into three (3) pressure planes – IH-35, Scenic Hills, and Live Oak. For the TCEQ Capacity Analysis, IH-35 and Scenic Hills pressure planes have been grouped together as they receive water from the same supply point. The 2030 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 21, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 22 and Table 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 39 Table 21: Projected 2030 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Existing Number of Connections 2030 Number of Connections IH-35 + Scenic Hills 9,913 11,966 Live Oak 6,118 7,385 Total 16,031 19,351 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 22 and Table 23 below assume that all near-term and recommended 2030 projects are complete and in-service. Table 22: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 8,100 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,196,000 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,393,200 13,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 7,180 11,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 23: 2030 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 8,855 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 738,500 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 1,477,000 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 4,431 12,600 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.2.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2030 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. The Corbett EST is filled by the new Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 40 Figure 13: 2030 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST drains slightly during peak demand times of the day but is able to recover. Figure 14: 2030 Peak Day Live Oak EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 41 The Nacogdoches EST level fluctuates throughout the peak day simulation but is able to be filled with the well. Figure 15: 2030 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST drains during the peak day simulation but is able to recover to initial levels around hour 27. Figure 16: 2030 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levels 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 42 The Northcliffe EST levels fluctuate frequently throughout the day but can easily recover to initial levels. Figure 17: 2030 Peak Day Northcliffe EST Levels 3.2.2.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2030 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500 gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes were selected at extremities of the system to represent the most conservative locations to achieve acceptable fire flow. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 12. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2030 system improvements. 3.2.2.4 2030 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2030 are listed in Table 24 and illustrated in Appendix 13. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 43 Table 24: 2030 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2030-W1 New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF) Serves new service area. 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12” WL Improvements Serves new service area. 2030-W3 8” WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Serves new service area. 2030-W4 Trainer Hale Rd 2” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. 2030-W5 Boenig Dr S 6” WL Replacement & 8” WL Improvement Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. 2030-W8 IH-10 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area. System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. 2030-W10 River Rd 6” WL Replacement Removes system bottleneck. 2030-W11 Undersized Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of pipes ≤6”. 2030-W12 Asbestos Cement Pipe Replacement Program Replacement of AC pipes. 3.2.2.5 2030 SSLGC Supply Need As part of the modeling effort, the water supply needed from the Schertz-Seguin Limited Government Corporation (SSLGC) was evaluated. Schertz is currently contracted for 5,801 gpm (8,351 acre-ft per year). An additional 3,799 gpm SSLGC water supply capacity for a total of 9,600 gpm is recommended to meet the 2030 projected system demands. 3.2.3 2050 System Evaluation The 2050 planning scenario is the final future scenario that was modeled. To develop the 2050 model, the 2030 model was updated to include the water demands associated with 2050 project land use. The model was run in average day, peak day, and fire flow conditions to identify improvements needed. A TCEQ capacity analysis was completed to confirm the system would meet TCEQ criteria with the recommended 2050 projects implemented. 3.2.3.1 TCEQ Capacity Analysis The TCEQ capacity analysis was also performed for supply, storage, and pumping with recommended improvements through 2050 implemented. The 2050 system meets all TCEQ capacity requirements. The number of projected connections for each pressure plane based on 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 44 current number of connections and projected growth in the system is provided in Table 25, and TCEQ capacity results are summarized in Table 26 and Table 27. Table 25: Projected 2050 Number of Connections per Pressure Plane Pressure Plane Number of Connections for TCEQ Capacity Analysis IH-35 + Scenic Hills 16,846 Live Oak 10,397 Total 27,243 Note: The capacity analysis in Table 26 and Table 27 assume that all near-term, recommended 2030, and recommended 2050 projects are complete and in-service. Table 26: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for IH-35 & Scenic Hills Pressure Planes IH-35 + Scenic Hills Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,684,600 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 3,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 3,369,200 16,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 10,108 13,300 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Table 27: 2050 TCEQ Capacity Analysis for Live Oak Pressure Plane Live Oak Pressure Plane Evaluation TCEQ Requirements System Check Total Supply Capacity [gpm] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 9,400 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Capacity [gal] 100 gal/conn 1,039,700 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Elevated Storage Credit [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 2,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Total Storage Capacity [gal] 200 gal/conn 2,079,400 7,500,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS Service Pump Capacity [GPM] 0.6 gpm/conn 6,239 13,000 MEETS TCEQ REQUIREMENTS 3.2.3.2 System Storage The City’s system includes five (5) elevated storage tanks (ESTs). Tank levels through the 2050 peak day scenario are illustrated in the following figures. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 45 The Corbett EST is filled by the Corbett pump station and is able to easily fill when the pump station is running. The lower water level can easily be manipulated based on the pump controls. Figure 18: 2050 Peak Day Corbett EST Levels The Live Oak EST levels drop in the peak demand times but are able to recover to initial levels within 24 hours. Figure 19: 2050 Peak Day LIve Oak EST Levels The Nacogdoches EST levels fluctuate throughout the peak day simulation but are able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 46 Figure 20: 2050 Peak Day Nacogdoches EST Levels The IH-35 EST is fed by the new 2050 IH-35 pump station and is easily able to fill based on running the proposed pump station. Figure 21: 2050 Peak Day IH-35 EST Levls The Northcliffe EST level fluctuates frequently throughout the peak day simulation but is able to easily recover. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 47 Figure 22: 2050 Peak Day Nortcliffe EST Levels 3.2.3.3 Fire Flow Analysis The 2050 water system was evaluated to determine the best locations to simulate fire flow conditions for residential and commercial users. For residential fire flow, a 1,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For commercial fire flow, a 3,500-gpm fire flow demand was modeled. For all fire flow analyses, a minimum system pressure of 20 psi is required per TCEQ. The fire flow nodes included all nodes included in the 2030 analysis with some additional nodes extending into new 2050 service areas. The fire flow node locations are illustrated in Appendix 14. All modeled locations passed fire flow with the recommended 2050 system improvements. 3.2.3.4 2050 CIP Projects Recommended CIPs for 2050 are listed in Table 28 and illustrated in Appendix 15. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 48 Table 28: 2050 Water CIP Project Summary CIP Number Description Notes Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system 2050-W2 FM 2252 8” WL Improvements Serves new service area 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area 2050-W4 Beck St 6” WL Replacement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8” WL Improvements Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Needed to meet growth in area 2050-W7 IH-10 and FM 1518 8” Improvements Needed to meet growth in area System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8” WL Replacement Needed for fire flow 3.2.3.5 2050 SSLGC Supply Needs Additional water supply from SSLGC is needed for the 2050 planning scenario. A total of 16,965 gpm of SSLGC supply is recommended to meet the 2050 projected system demands. 3.2.4 Summary The recommendations provided in this section were a collaborative effort with City staff and LAN to identify and model water system improvements to resolve near-term problems as well as meet the needs due to projected growth for the 2030 and 2050 planning periods. The water model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and can be adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 49 4. WASTEWATER SYSTEM EVALUATION & CIP A wastewater system model was created in Bentley Sewer GEMS by LAN using data provided by the City. LAN presented the model to the City during a meeting on September 10, 2020. Updates to the model were then made according to the comments from the City. To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a reliable hydraulic model is needed. Model reliability is developed through hydraulic model calibration. Model calibration and simulation were performed using Sewer GEMS software which provided the tool and results necessary to assess the existing wastewater system under dry and wet weather conditions. The purpose of this technical memorandum (TM) is to summarize the calibration results for Average Day Flow (ADF) dry and wet weather conditions and to identify areas with hydraulic deficiencies in the City’s wastewater system based on a design storm. 4.1 Modeling the Existing Wastewater System 4.1.1 Flow Monitoring and Rain Gauges RJN Group installed 15 flow monitors in the City’s wastewater system across a variety of gravity main sizes. The flow monitors recorded data in 5-minute increments from April through June of 2020. The goal of the flow monitoring was to record dry weather flows as well as wet weather flows during rain events. RJN also installed six rain gauges in concert with the flow monitors to collect the rainfall data. The rain gauges were located to capture spatial variation of rainfall across the sewer system in 5-minute increments. Appendix 16 illustrates placement of rain gauges, where the 15 flow monitors were placed in the City’s sewer system and the boundaries of the corresponding sewer shed basin for each flow monitor. A schematic network of the flow monitor basins within the City’s sewer system is provided in Figure 23. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 50 Figure 23: Schematic of Flow Monitors in the City's Wastewater System 4.1.2 Dry Weather Calibration Criteria The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for dry weather calibration effort: · The modeled and monitored flow hydrographs should follow closely in terms of the shape and magnitude. · Timing of the high and low flows from the model and the flow monitors should be within 1- hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 10% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 10% range. 4.1.3 Dry Weather Flows (DWF) Developing base sanitary sewer loads for each sewershed basin is an iterative process. First, preliminary base loads were estimated by applying Traffic Analysis Zone (TAZ) population and employment data to each sewershed basin. A unique gallon per capita per day (gpcd) was estimated for each basin using the TAZ data and the flow monitoring data. These gpcds were then used to calculate the preliminary base load for each basin which was input into the model. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 51 Second, Tuesday May 26, 2020, was chosen as the dry weather calibration day due to the lack of any rainstorms on that day and the consistency in the monitoring across all 15 of the flow monitors within this 24-hour period. Next, a 24-hour Extended Period Simulation was run in the model and the results were compared to the flow monitoring data collected on the chosen dry weather calibration day. Based on this comparison, adjustments were made to the base load and diurnal pattern for each basin until the model results met the dry weather calibration criteria. Some adjustments to the preliminary sanitary loading were significant because the TAZ polygon data which were used to calculate the initial base load estimates are on a large scale. These adjustments were needed to represent the density of load distribution more accurately in the system. To further refine the sanitary loading in the system, point loads were applied to represent significantly large contributors such as apartment buildings or schools. A summary of the adjustments made per basin is provided in Table 29. Table 29: Dry Weather Sanitary Load & Diurnal Curve Adjustment Summary Figure 24 provides an example of a diurnal pattern developed for flow monitor basin FM-12. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 52 Figure 24: Example Plot of Diurnal Pattern 4.1.4 Dry Weather Calibration Results The dry weather calibration was an iterative process involving adjustment of base sanitary loadings, diurnal curves, and point loads. Eventually, the adjustment process produced results that fit the calibration criteria. Figure 25 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled dry weather flows (FM-06). Graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are provided in Appendix 17. Figure 25: Sample Dry Weather Calibration Plot 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 53 Table 30 shows the dry weather calibration results for the 15 flow monitoring locations. Table 30: Dry Weather Calibration Results As shown in Table 30, dry weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There are few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the criteria described above. Those basins are FM-03, FM-08, FM-10, and FM-11. All these basins have lift stations upstream of the monitoring locations which directly affect the model results. For basins FM-03 and FM-11, assumptions were made for the lift stations within the basin. Those assumptions were provided in the Existing Wastewater System TM (September 4, 2020). The FM-08 basin has eight lift stations. Without accurate pump curves and pump operations for all the lift stations in these basins, the results are satisfactory with the current level of accuracy achieved. In addition to the City-owned lift stations in basins FM-03 and FM-11, there are several privately owned lift stations that contribute to the overall sanitary loadings in the wastewater system. Pump curves for these smaller lift stations were not available, therefore pump curves were assumed for modeling purposes. The following lift stations are privately owned: Aquatic Center, FedEx, & Fire Station 3. For Basins FM-06 and FM-10, calibration was performed by assuming sanitary loadings for business and institutes in the basins (see Table 29 for the specific adjustments performed on each basin). 4.1.5 Wet Weather Calibration Criteria Wet weather calibration is necessary along with dry weather calibration to adequately model the effects that rainfall derived inflow and infiltration (RDII) have on the wastewater system. The following guidelines were used as calibration criteria for WW calibration effort: · The hydrographs (modeled and observed) should closely reflect the same shape and magnitude. · The peaks and troughs of the hydrographs (modeled and observed) should be within one hour. · The modeled and monitored peak flows should be within +/- 15% range. · The modeled and monitored total volume should be within +/- 15% range. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 54 4.1.6 Calibration Rainfall Event Six rain gauges were installed for the duration of the flow monitoring period to record rainfall events. Review of the observed rainfall and flow monitoring data identified a distinct rain event with reliable flow monitoring data that could be used for wet weather calibration. Table 31 summarizes the rainfall event identified for wet weather calibration at the six rain gauges. Table 31: Rainfall Event Properties Because there were only six rain gauges for the 15 flowmeter basins, it was necessary to make assumptions as to which rain data to associate with each basin. Table 32 presents those assumptions. Table 32: Rain Gauge Data Assumptions In addition to the basins listed above, the SARA and Hallie’s Cove Outfalls were associated with RG-01 data because no rain monitoring took place in those areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 55 4.1.7 Wet Weather Flow Characterization To calibrate for wet weather, the RTK Method was used in the model to predict the sanitary sewer system’s short-, medium-, and long-term response to a rainfall event. These parameters, developed using the flow monitoring data recorded in the field, are applied in the model so that results are representative of field conditions. The R, T, and K parameters are defined as follows: · R - fraction of precipitation that enters the sanitary sewer system · T - the time to peak of the hydrograph · K - the ratio of the ‘time of recession’ to the ‘time to peak’. How these parameters are used to generate the short-, medium-, and long-term unit hydrographs used in the model is illustrated in Figure 26. Figure 26: RTK Method Parameters The RTK method creates a triangle from the three values with a separate triangle made for each type of response (short, medium, and long). The final hydrograph is represented by the addition of the three triangles. Therefore, this method uses a total of 9 parameters (3 RTK parameter sets for each of the 3 triangles that represent the short, medium, and long-term responses.) LAN assigned a RTK hydrograph to each of the flow monitoring locations that would represent the response to the rainfall. Then, iterative model runs were used to adjust the RTK parameters until the model outputs and flow monitoring were within tolerances specified by the calibration criteria. A 30- hour extended period simulation (EPS) scenario for wet weather calibration was created for the following period: Sunday May 24, 2020, through 6:00 AM on Monday May 25, 2020. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 56 There can be some variations between a sewer’s diurnal pattern on a weekday vs. a weekend. Because the rainfall event selected to use for wet weather calibration occurred on a weekend, the flow monitoring data was used to develop an adjusted diurnal pattern that represents the behavior of system base flows on a weekend. The weekend diurnal pattern was applied to the base sanitary loads in the system for the wet weather calibration. Accurately representing the pattern of the base flow will prevent the over or under estimation of the system’s response to rainfall with the development of the RTK parameters. 4.1.8 Wet Weather Calibration Results Using the data from the six rain gauges, the flow monitoring data and the RTK hydrographs, the model was calibrated. With the rain data collected and assigned to the separate flow monitor basins, the RTK hydrograph values were estimated for each basin. Table 33 lists calibrated RTK parameters for wet weather calibration for each flowmeter basin. Table 33: Calibrated RTK Parameters Figure 27 presents a typical plot of observed versus modeled wet weather flows (FM-06). Wet weather graphs for the 15 flowmeter basins are shown in Appendix 17. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 57 Figure 27: Sample Wet Weather Calibration Plot Table 34 documents the results of the wet weather calibration for all 15 flowmeter basins. Table 34: Wet Weather Calibration Results Wet weather calibration reached reasonable results with most basins meeting the calibration criteria. There were few flow monitor basins that do not fully meet the wet weather calibration criteria. Those basins were FM-04, FM-11, and FM-15. Like dry weather calibration, inaccurate pump curves and pump operation for lift stations within these basins could adversely affect the model 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 58 results. In addition, FM-11 flowmeter data seems to be erroneous at some time periods. Looking at the FM-04 graph in Appendix 18 and comparing its peak flow with upstream contributing flowmeter basins (FM-12 and FM-13), the observed FM-04 peak flow (5 mgd) is lower than summation of peak flows at FM-12 (5.4 mgd) and FM-13 (0.75 mgd). In fact, summing up the observed peak flows at FM-12 and FM-13 (6.15 mgd) provides a peak flow closer to the modeled peak flow at FM-04. This discrepancy might be related to erroneous flowmeter data at FM 04 or there might be an unknown unmetered interconnect with leaving flows to another basin from FM 04. For FM-15, the observed flows at 5/25/20 from 0:00 to 6:00 AM seems too high, as the rain started to diminish around that time based on the recording at RG-03, which indicates flows cannot be as high as the FM-15 showed during that time period. 4.1.9 RDII Assessment The flow monitoring data for the calibration days were used to assess the sewer system susceptibility and response to RDII. Table 35 shows the wet weather peaking factors (peak WWF/average DWF). Table 35: Calibration Event Wet Weather Peaking Factors for Metered Basins Only FM-06 and FM-12 had substantial RDII response. The rest of the basins did not have significant RDII response based on the flow monitoring data for the calibration days. 4.2 Existing Wastewater System Evaluation 4.2.1 Design Storm To evaluate the existing wastewater system, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the calibrated model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.3-inches. The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution type III. Figure 28 shows the hyetograph of the design storm used for this evaluation. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 59 Figure 28: 5-Year 24 Hour Design Storm 4.2.2 System Evaluation The 5-year 24-hour design storm shown in Figure 28 was then applied to the City’s calibrated model for system evaluation. The following criteria were used to evaluate the existing wastewater system and identify potential problem areas: · Sanitary Sewer Overflows (SSO) at manholes · Surcharged gravity mains The majority of the SSOs and surcharged lines in the system are located on the 10-inch CCMA line which parallels Roy Richard Dr. and the 30-inch CCMA line which follows the drainage channel from I- 35 down to the outfall at Cibolo Creek. Some surcharging and SSOs were also predicted by the model in the Northcliffe area around the I-35 corridor. The extents and locations of these SSOs and surcharged lines for the existing system evaluation results are presented in Appendix 19. 4.2.3 Summary Using data collected from the flow monitors and rain gauges, the wastewater hydraulic model for the City of Schertz was calibrated for both dry and wet weather flows. The model calibration reached the required level of accuracy for both calibration scenarios. Further accuracy may be achieved with the provision of further data such as pump curve information and detailed customer sanitary sewer flow information for certain areas. Following the model calibration, the City’s wastewater system was evaluated based on a 5-year, 24-hour design storm for wet weather condition. The total number of SSOs found to be 21 (7 of these 21 SSOs are on lines owned by the City) which is less than 1 percent of the total number of manholes. The total length of sewer found to be capacity deficient (maximum flow greater than pipe full capacity) 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 60 was approximately 52,000-feet (of which approximately 22,500-feet is owned by the City). This is about 5.7 percent of the total existing conduits length. The next phase of the modeling process is a future model evaluation. This phase of the modeling includes running the model with population predictions based on the future TAZ population data and recommendations for future system improvements as part of the City’s capital improvement plan. This evaluation will be described in the next section. 4.3 Future Wastewater System Evaluation & CIPs The City contracted LAN to conduct the wastewater system improvement analysis and update the Capital Improvements Plan (CIP). This effort requires developing a future sanitary sewer representation model of the City’s collection system based on anticipated growth areas. Future Average Dry Weather Flow and Wet Weather Flow scenarios for 10-year and 30-year were developed. The purpose of this section is to summarize the results of the future wastewater system improvement analysis and list the 10-year and 30-year wastewater system CIPs. 4.3.1 Future Modeling Methodology The future scenarios assumed increases in residential and commercial/industrial developments based on information about planned development projects provided by the City. LAN used the City’s calibrated model for dry and wet weather scenarios as the base for this analysis and allocated wastewater sanitary loads to the wastewater hydraulic model using the projected water demands developed for the Schertz water hydraulic model. To generate the sanitary loads, a return rate of 70% was applied to water demand at each node. Then GIS tools were used to determine which demand nodes fell within the existing wastewater service areas. If a demand node fell outside an existing service area, new interceptors were recommended to connect them to an existing or future wastewater treatment plant. Using Thiessen polygon and Loadbuilder tools from SewerGEMS, the sanitary loads were allocated to the nearest manholes in the model. Table 36 presents the existing and future average dry weather flow projections. Table 36: Dry Weather Flow Projections Future scenarios were created in the model for the 10-year (2030) and 30-year (2050) increments, along with their respective sanitary loads to simulate the future growth anticipated by the City. Diurnal curves were developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model and then used to distribute the future average dry weather sanitary flows over 24 hours. Analysis began on the 2030 scenario to evaluate the system and to find where the required improvements to the existing system are, besides any future projects to accommodate the new growth areas. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 61 4.3.1.1 Hydraulic Criteria Hydraulic criteria used for this analysis include capacity deficiency and design criteria. Capacity deficiency criteria identify the need to replace an existing facility, while design criteria determine the size of new facilities. These criteria were established based on the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) and engineering best practices. Table 37 lists a summary of capacity deficiency criteria used for the existing system in this analysis. Table 37: Capacity Deficiency Criteria for Existing Facilities Table 38 lists a summary of design criteria used for new sewer facilities. Table 38: Design Criteria for New Sewer Facilities 4.3.1.2 Design Storm For wet weather scenarios, a 5-year design storm with a 24-hour duration was applied to the model. For the City of Schertz, the rainfall depth provided in the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association’s Atlas 14 precipitation frequency estimates is 5.4 inches. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 62 The rainfall depth was distributed over time using the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) rainfall distribution Type III, representing the rainfall temporal distribution type happening in the Gulf of Mexico and Atlantic coastal areas (TR-55 Cover (hydrocad.net)). The same hyetograph in section 4.2.1 is applicable to this evaluation. 4.3.1.3 Inflow & Infiltration Assumption The RTK hydrographs developed from the field monitoring data for the existing system model were used to represent the inflow and infiltration (I&I) for the existing infrastructure and service areas. In addition to utilizing diurnal curves to incorporate peak dry flow, a peaking factor of 4 was applied to represent the effect of I&I for future loadings outside the existing service areas where there is no historical data is available. The assumption was that new infrastructure would meet current standards and would therefore be less susceptible to I&I. 4.3.2 Future System Analysis & CIPs The following scenarios were created for future system analysis: · Dry Weather 2030 Scenario · Wet Weather 2030 Scenario · Dry Weather 2050 Scenario · Wet Weather 2050 Scenario Table 39 shows a breakdown of the dry weather flow projections for each planning period by the system outfalls. Table 39: Breakdown of Average Dry Weather Flows by Outfalls 4.3.2.1 Near Term CIP Projects The near-term project list for Schertz provided by the City was incorporated into the existing system to create future scenarios along with future sanitary loadings. Each scenario includes all the currently planned projects that will be in place by that planning year. Table 40 lists currently planned projects (near-term) provided by the City (shown in Appendix 20). 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 63 Table 40: Near Term Projects Summary It is important to note that the pipe size was undetermined for the Cibolo West Main Trunkline. Based on the available information and hydraulic model results, LAN recommends an 18-inch pipe size for the above project. In addition, LAN received the 2021 Wastewater Collection System Master Plan for the Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority (CCMA) prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. The CCMA’s CIP projects affecting the Schertz sewer system were also incorporated into each scenario based on the planning year. 4.3.2.2 2030 CIP Growth Projects The 2030 scenario included the currently planned CIP projects for the City. To serve the new development areas happening between 2022 to 2030, LAN proposes new growth CIPs as listed in Table 41. The alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment and are to be considered as preliminary. Final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 was used to size the new facilities. For modeling purposes, slopes for new growth CIP lines were assumed based on the TCEQ minimum slope requirement. At some locations, higher than minimum slopes were considered to prevent extra excavation. Appendix 21 shows the location of the 2030 growth CIPs. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 64 Table 41: 2030 Growth Projects Summary 4.3.2.3 Model Results Under 2030 Flows After bringing in the 2030 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2030 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 22. The results show 98% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5. It also shows gravity lines parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and upstream of the Friesenhahn lift station having maximum d/D of greater than 0.75, and gravity lines right upstream of Riata lift station having a maximum d/D between 0.5 and 0.75. This indicates these gravity lines (i.e., with maximum d/D greater than 0.5) may not accommodate the additional capacity needs from future flows and could require upsizing. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2030 wet weather flow (average dry weather plus 5-year, 24-hour I&I) was used to determine areas that are susceptible to sanitary sewer overflows (SSOs). Note that the model shows SSOs at locations where the maximum hydraulic grade (HGL) rises above manhole rim elevations. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 23. The results show a total of 11 manholes within the existing service areas are overflowing. Per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37, the sewer system is capacity deficient at the locations where SSOs are reported by the model. 4.3.2.4 2030 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN proposes several system improvement projects listed in Table 42 to address the SSOs. In addition, Belmont Park lift station is set to go offline by 2030 per City staff. Therefore, that lift station was set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass it. LAN also determined that the Northcliffe (Town Creek) lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 4,800 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Appendix 24 shows the location of the 2030 system improvement projects. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 65 Table 42: 2030 System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.5 2030 CCMA Recommended Projects The results of the 2030 wet weather flow scenario showed some of the CCMA’s gravity lines have capacity issues that would affect the City’s sewer system performance. LAN recommends the following system improvement projects related to CCMA’s gravity lines (listed in Table 43 and shown in Appendix 24). Although originally listed as 2041 CCMA CIPs (Projects 2030 C-1 & 2030 C-2) and as Buildout CCMA CIP (Project 2030 C-4) in the Wastewater Collection System Master Plan prepared by Kimley Horn Inc. in 2021, LAN currently recommends these CIP projects for inclusion in the 2030 planning period. Table 43: 2030 CCMA System Improvement Projects Summary 4.3.2.6 2050 CIP Growth Projects To develop the 2050 scenario, the system changes proposed for 2030 were used as the base. To serve the new development areas happening between 2030 to 2050, LAN proposes new growth CIPs listed in Table 44 and shown in Appendix 25. Similar to 2030 growth CIPs, the alignments are based on the available information regarding topographic elevations, existing roads, and engineering judgment, and final alignments will be determined as part of the design process. The design criteria listed in Table 38 were used to size the new facilities. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 66 Table 44: 2050 Growth Projects Summary In addition, Schertz Pkwy, Cover’s Cove, and Park lift stations are set to go offline by 2050 per City staff. Therefore, Cover’s Cove and Park lift stations were set inactive in the model, and gravity lines were added to bypass that lift station. Schertz Pkwy lift station will also go offline, and its flow will be conveyed to a new CCMA line which will be built by 2050. However, due to the unavailability of information about the new CCMA’s line, the Schertz Pkwy lift station was set inactive in the model and its flow was directed to a new outfall. 4.3.2.7 Model Results Under 2050 Flows After bringing in the 2050 new growth CIPs, the model was run with predicted 2050 dry weather flows. The modeling results for this scenario are presented in Appendix 26. Similar to 2030 scenario results, 97% of conduits have a maximum depth to diameter (d/D) of less than 0.5, and only 3% of gravity lines have a maximum (d/D) of greater than 0.5. Since peak wet weather is crucial for analyzing a sewer system, the 2050 wet weather flow was used to determine areas that are susceptible to overflowing. The modeling results show no manholes are overflowing indicating the 2050 system has sufficient capacity per the Capacity Deficiency Criteria listed in Table 37. Therefore, LAN does not recommend any capacity-related CIPs for the 2050 planning period. 4.3.2.8 2050 CIP System Improvement Projects LAN determined that Cypress Point lift station needs to upgrade to a firm capacity of 1,250 gpm to meet TCEQ requirements (refer to section 2.5.3). Table 45 describes 2050 system improvement projects shown in Appendix 27. Table 45: 2050 System Improvement Projects Summary 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 67 4.3.2.9 Pumping Capacity Evaluation For pumping capacity evaluation, the existing firm capacity (i.e., capacity with the largest pump off) will be compared to peak wet weather flow at each lift station. Per TCEQ requirements, peak wet weather flow should not exceed firm capacity. Table 46 shows the results of the pumping capacity evaluation. Note that this analysis has only been conducted for public existing lift stations; private lift stations have been excluded from the study. Table 46: Lift Station Capacity Evaluation As seen in Table 46, except for Cypress Point and Northcliffe lift stations, all other existing lift stations have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since their peak flows are less than lift station firm capacities. Per TCEQ requirement, Northcliffe lift station requires an upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 4,485 gpm, and Cypress Point lift 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 68 station needs an upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm based on its 2050 peak flow of 1,233 gpm. Northcliffe lift station upgrade should be done as early as 2030, but Cypress Point’s upgrade can wait until 2050. 4.3.2.10 Force Main Capacity Evaluation As listed in Table 37, the hydraulic criterion for force mains is not to exceed a maximum velocity of 8 ft/s under the peak wet weather flow (average dry plus 5-year, 24-hour storm flow). Higher than 8 ft/s velocities correspond to high head loss in force mains which over time scour force main interior causing premature structural failure. Table 47 shows the results of the force main capacity evaluation. Table 47: Force Main Capacity Evaluation All existing force mains have adequate capacity for existing and future peak flows since they have velocities below the maximum criterion (8 ft/s). 4.3.3 Summary The recommendations outlined in this section were a joint effort with City personnel and LAN to identify improvements needed for the City’s sewer system. These improvements aim to address capacity limitations and accommodate the anticipated growth in the planning years of 2030 and 2050. The sewer collection system model should be maintained and updated as new projects are implemented and adjusted to address changes in development schedules. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 69 5. IMPACT FEE DEVELOPMENT 5.1 Living Unit Equivalent Living unit or service unit equivalents (LUEs) are “a standardized measure of consumption, use, generation, or discharge attributable to an individual unit of development calculated in accordance with generally accepted engineering or planning standards and based on historical data and trends applicable to the political subdivision in which the individual unit of development is located during the previous 10 years”. Standard engineering practices equate one water LUE to a single, typical residential water meter’s usage. The wastewater LUE is assumed to be 70% of a single residential water meter’s usage to account for irrigation, evaporation, and other water losses associated with the wastewater system. An analysis of the existing water and wastewater system hydraulic models determined that the water LUE is 0.17 gpm, and the wastewater LUE is 0.119 gpm. From the hydraulic water model, the total existing and future 2030 system flows for residential and “other” uses were calculated. These total flow values were divided by their respective LUE to determine the growth in each system. “Growth” in this case refers to the difference between the 2030 value and the existing value. It is important to note that the CCN boundaries for the Schertz water and wastewater system are not the same, so the growth in the respective systems is slightly different. Table 48 & Table 49 below show the process of determining the growth in LUEs for the water and wastewater systems. Table 48: Calculations for Growth in Water LUEs Growth in Water LUEs Scenario Total Flow (gpm) Living Unit Equivalent (gpm) # of LUEs Existing Residential 2,225 0.17 13,089 Existing Other 2,485 14,620 2030 Residential 3,372 19,838 2030 Other 2,545 14,971 Growth In Residential: 6,749 Growth In Other: 351 Table 49: Calculations for Growth in Wastewater LUEs Growth in Wastewater LUEs Scenario Total Flow (gpm) Living Unit Equivalent (gpm) # of LUEs Existing Business 113 0.119 951 Existing Other 3,483 29,269 2030 Business 123 1,034 2030 Other 4,332 36,403 Growth in Business: 82 Growth In Other: 7,134 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 70 5.2 Cost Data The Association for the Advancement of Cost Engineering (AACE) provides a cost estimate classification system that includes five classes of estimates. Each class has specific characteristics that indicate the level of detail of the cost estimate, with 5 being the least defined and 1 being the most defined. These classes are commonly used industry standards for engineers, contractors, and estimators. The accuracy range of an estimate narrows (becomes more accurate) as the project scope becomes more defined as shown in Figure 29 from AACE below. In the same figure, the approximate overlap of classes is shown as well in relation to the level of scope definition. Figure 29: AACE Cost Estimate Clases For this analysis, Class 4 estimating was identified as the appropriate, industry standard, estimation class. According to AACE, Class 4 estimates “are prepared for a number of purposes, such as but not limited to, detailed strategic planning, business development, project screening at more developed stages, alternative scheme analysis, confirmation of economic and/or technical feasibility and preliminary budget approval or approval to proceed to next stage”. The developed cost estimates are preliminary and rely on available information and standard preliminary engineering methods for Class 4 cost estimation. These methods were consistently applied to similar project components (e.g., pipelines, pump stations, lift stations, etc.) to facilitate comparison between different project alternatives. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 71 Cost data for the proposed CIP projects was obtained from the following sources: · TxDOT Online Bid Reports (past year) · RS Means Database · Cost Estimates from Past & Current City Projects · Cost Estimates from Past & Current LAN Projects Item costs were averaged from these sources and an inflation rate was applied to the costs for 2030 and 2050, which is discussed in detail in the following section. A 30% contingency factor was applied across all cost estimates, which reflects the range of accuracy of a Class 4 estimate. For cost components that were highly variable and unpredictable at this stage of analysis, such as developing construction documents and construction management, estimates were derived from previous project experience and included as a percentage of the total construction costs. 5.3 Inflation Rate Calculation In order to accurately capture construction prices for the future scenarios, an average yearly inflation rate was calculated and applied to the 2030 & 2050 project cost estimates. Three sources were consulted for historical inflation indexes including RS Means, Mortenson Construction Cost Indexes, and Turner Building Cost Indexes. Varying time frames of inflation were provided by these sources, but the data was not normalized to ensure that a wide range of indexes were included in the yearly inflation rate calculation. Additionally, these indexes are the average of nationwide data. Table 50 below shows the varying time frames and their associated total and yearly inflation rates. The median yearly inflation rate of this data is 3.91%, and this value was applied to the line items in the 2030 and 2050 cost estimates. See Appendix 28 for inflation rate source data. Table 50: Yearly Inflation Rate Calculations Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate RS Means Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2024 128% 6.31% 2010 to 2024 169% 3.81% 2000 to 2024 251% 3.91% 1990 to 2024 309% 3.38% 1980 to 2024 454% 3.50% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 132% 9.65% 2010 to 2023 188% 5.93% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes 2020 to 2023 117% 5.27% 2010 to 2023 172% 4.25% 2000 to 2023 231% 3.70% 1996 to 2024 272% 3.77% Average: 4.86% Median: 3.91% 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 72 5.4 Project Costs Eligibility Estimates of total construction cost for the proposed water and wastewater CIP projects were developed. However, TLGC Section 395 stipulates that only certain types of projects and only the portion of the project utilized during the 10-year planning period can be included in the impact fee eligible total. 5.4.1 Eligible Project Types There are defined items payable by the impact fee per TLGC Section 395, and these items are listed in Section 1 of this report. The proposed CIP projects were divided into “Growth” projects and “System Improvement” projects to assist in clearly identifying those projects that are eligible. Some of the projects only have a portion of the project costs listed as eligible because they serve both new growth and provide system improvements. Only the growth portions of those projects are eligible to be included in the total impact fee costs. The following types of projects are not eligible to be included in the total impact fee costs: · All 2050 Projects · Cibolo Creek Municipal Authority Projects (CCMA) In the tables below, the projects, costs and their impact fee eligible costs are shown for the Water CIP, Wastewater CIP, and the recommended CCMA System Improvement projects. Projects denoted by two asterisks indicate that only a portion of the project costs are impact fee eligible. See Appendix 29 for individual project cost estimates. 5.4.2 Project Utilization During 10-Year Planning Period This water and wastewater master plan includes three phases of projects: near term, 2030, and 2050. Only the projects within the 10-year planning period of 2020-2030 are eligible to be paid by impact fees in this analysis. TLGC also stipulates that only the portion of a project that is utilized during the 10- year period may be considered for impact fee eligibility. The utilization is determined by the following equation: % = 2030 − 2020 2050 There are some cases where proposed 2030 CIP projects utilize 100% of their build out capacity in 2030 and then in 2050 use less than the build out capacity. This occurs due to additional infrastructure being added in 2050 which takes on some of the capacity burden from those 2030 CIP projects. In these cases, the utilization is determined using the same equation as above, but with 2030 Peak Flow in the denominator: % ( ) = 2030 − 2020 2030 See Appendix 30 for utilization calculations. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 73 Table 51: Near Term Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects NT-W1** Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 27% $206,715 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 0% $0 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 0% $0 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 0% $0 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 0% $0 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 0% $0 NT-W7** Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 69% $1,077,040 NT-W8** FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 22% $194,778 NT-W9** Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 0% $0 NT-W10** Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 0% $0 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $23,206,556 - $1,478,532 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Table 52: 2030 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 100% $4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 89% $1,272,934 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 97% $3,569,245 2030-W4** Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 93% $9,192,317 2030-W5** Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 69% $4,411,757 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 100% $32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 33% $1,737,667 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 100% $6,063,000 2030 Growth Subtotal: $69,503,000 - $63,109,920 System Improvement Projects 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 0% $0 2030-W10** River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 58% $1,354,926 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $2,738,000 - $1,354,926 2030 TOTAL: $72,241,000 - $64,464,846 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 74 Table 53: 2050 Water CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050 CIP Projects are not eligible to be included in this impact fee total. 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $68,177,000 System Improvement Projects 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $4,775,000 2050 TOTAL: $72,952,000 Table 54: Near Term Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Near Term CIP Growth Projects NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 21% $1,440,972 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 0% $0 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24" $10,425,000 23% $2,378,763 NT-S4** Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 20% $771,788 NT-S5** Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 25% $526,887 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 83% $13,523,463 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 74% $2,517,091 Near Term Growth Subtotal: $45,760,800 - $21,158,965 System Improvement Projects NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 0% $0 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 0% $0 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 0% $0 Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $1,763,000 - $0 NEAR TERM TOTAL: $47,523,800 - $21,158,965 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 75 Original 2009 master plan cost was $9,000,000 and the 2024 construction cost was $13,000,000 resulting in a difference of $3,400,000. Table 55: 2030 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 67% $1,359,153 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8" $1,338,000 5% $68,849 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 10% $249,210 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 12% $47,722 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8" $1,663,000 83% $1,372,188 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 33% $1,613,509 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 100% $1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8" $475,000 100% $475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10" $2,525,000 100% $2,522,465 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10" $1,038,000 100% $1,034,756 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8" $3,113,000 97% $3,012,264 2030-S12 FM 1518 8" $400,000 40% $160,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 99% $2,677,145 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8" $2,963,000 29% $849,531 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8" $1,275,000 52% $661,379 2030 Growth Subtotal: $29,342,000 - $18,041,171 System Improvement Projects 2030 SI-1** Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 22% $1,833,143 2030 SI-2** Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 9% $121,579 2030 SI-3** Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 4% $46,406 2030 SI-4** Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 4% $13,741 2030 SI-5** Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 61% $3,099,614 2030 SI-6** Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 5% $392,686 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 0% $0 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $24,527,000 - $5,507,169 2030 TOTAL: $53,869,000 - $23,548,341 Note: Projects denoted by ** indicate that it has both growth & system improvement components. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 76 Table 56: 2050 Wastewater CIP Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050-S1 I-35 N 8" $9,088,000 2050 CIP projects are not eligible to be included in the impact fee total. 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8" $6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8" $2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8" $1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 2050 Growth Subtotal: $28,865,000 System Improvement Projects 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: $5,602,000 2050 TOTAL: $34,467,000 Table 57: CCMA 2030 System Improvement Projects Estimate of Probable Costs Project Number Project Name Project Cost Proposed 2030 CIP CCMA System Improvement Projects 2030 C-1 Roy Richard Drive Replacements $1,588,000 2030 C-2 Valencia Lane Replacements $2,288,000 2030 C-3 Savannah Drive Replacements $12,425,000 2030 C-4 Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line $12,950,000 CCMA System Improvement Projects Total: $29,251,000 5.5 Water Meter Updates Part of the update to the impact fees included updating the water meter types and characteristics to correspond with the new meters that the City will now be utilizing. The City was previously using simple, compound, and turbine type meters. Going forward, the City will be using multi-jet and ultrasonic meters. The maximum allowable impact fees by meter size were calculated by multiplying the LUE per meter by the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees. Table 58 shows the difference in the existing and proposed meter characteristics. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 77 Table 58: Existing & Proposed Meter Characteristics Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate (gpm) Normal Flow Range (gpm) Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Existing LUE by Meter Size Proposed LUE by Meter Size 5/8" MULTI-JET 20 1-20 15 1.0 1.0 3/4" MULTI-JET 30 2-30 20 1.5 1.3 1" MULTI-JET 50 3-50 30 2.5 2.0 2" ULTRASONIC 250 0.5-250 250 10.0 16.7 3" ULTRASONIC 500 1-500 500 24.0 33.3 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 1.5-1,000 1,000 42.0 66.7 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 3-1,600 1,600 92.0 106.7 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 5-2,800 2,800 80.0 186.7 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 14-5,500 5,500 250.0 366.7 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 14-5,500 5,500 330.0 366.7 These meter type changes affected the maximum flow rate for continuous duty for each meter size, which established the updated LUE per meter. The LUE per meter size corresponds to the equivalent impact fees for each meter size. See Appendix 31 for the new multi-jet and ultrasonic meter characteristics. 5.6 Maximum Allowable Impact Fees TLGC requires that the maximum allowable impact fee may not exceed the value of the total impact fee eligible costs (identified in Section 5.4 of this report) less the required credit that reduces the overall impact fee eligible costs, divided by the growth in LUEs. This credit to the growth-related cost component of the impact fee calculation is required under Local Government Code Chapter 395 to ensure that new service units are not double charged for impact fee related capital improvements. The credit can be determined in the following ways: · A credit for the portion of ad valorem tax and utility service revenues generated by new service units during the program period that is used for the payment of improvements, including the payment of debt, that are included in the capital improvements plan. · In the alternative, a credit equal to 50 percent of the total projected cost of implementing the capital improvements plan. 5.6.1 Credit Analysis The first method was used to calculate the credit and was applied as shown in Table 59 and Table 60. This credit calculation method was performed by the City’s financial consultant, Willdan Financial Services. According to Wildan’s report, there were seven critical assumptions made in order to determine the credits: 1) Willdan assumed a ten-year period for the calculation, FY 2025 – FY 2034, consistent with guidelines set by Chapter 395. 2) Willdan utilized Capital Improvement Plan cost estimates and percentages of each project allocable to growth developed by City staff and its consulting engineers (LAN). 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 78 3) Growth estimates were based on the latest forecasts as presented by the City’s consulting engineers (LAN). 4) Terms and interest rates for new debt forecast to be issued for growth-related improvements were based on estimates used in the City’s 2023 water and wastewater rate study. 5) Willdan is interpreting Chapter 395 so that the debt allocable to growth-related projects includes both principal and interest. 6) Current debt allocable to growth-related projects was based on estimates provided by City staff. 7) The totals represent Net Present Values of the ten-year cash flows utilizing a discount rate of 6.0%. From these assumptions, the following values were calculated: WATER Revenue Credit -- $3,365,530 WASTEWATER Revenue Credit -- $4,611,802 The full report and detailed credit calculations can be found in Appendix 32. 5.6.2 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee After the calculated credit is applied, the total impact fee eligible costs are divided by the growth in LUEs (discussed in Sections 2 & 5.1 of this report) to obtain the maximum allowable impact fee per LUE. Table 59 and Table 60 summarize the maximum allowable impact fee calculations, including credits. Table 59: Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Water Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $65,943,379 Credit (Calculated: 5.1%) ($3,365,530) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $62,577,849 Growth in LUEs 7,100 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee per LUE $8,814 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 79 Table 60: Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee Wastewater Impact Fee Impact Fee Eligible Costs $44,707,306 Credit (Calculated: 8.6%) ($4,611,802) Total Impact Fee Eligible Costs $40,095,504 Growth in LUEs 7,217 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee per LUE $5,556 As discussed in the previous section, updates were made to the meter types that the City will be using. Table 61 reflects both the update to the impact fees by meter type and the new meter characteristics. The impact fee by meter size was calculated by multiplying the proposed LUE by the maximum allowable water or wastewater impact fee for per LUE (identified in the tables above). In the last two columns of Table 61, the maximum allowable water and wastewater impact fees by meter size are presented. Table 61: Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Meter Type Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gpm) Proposed LUE Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee 5/8" MULTI-JET 15 1.0 $8,814 $5,556 3/4" MULTI-JET 20 1.3 $11,810 $7,445 1" MULTI-JET 30 2.0 $17,627 $11,112 2" ULTRASONIC 250 16.7 $146,924 $92,615 3" ULTRASONIC 500 33.3 $293,848 $185,231 4" ULTRASONIC 1,000 66.7 $587,607 $370,406 6" ULTRASONIC 1,600 106.7 $940,154 $592,639 8" ULTRASONIC 2,800 186.7 $1,645,248 $1,037,104 10" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 12" ULTRASONIC 5,500 366.7 $3,231,708 $2,037,150 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 80 5.7 Comparison of Local Impact Fees Since the last water and wastewater impact fee update was performed in 2011, the City expressed interest in comparing the 2024 proposed fees with other municipalities and utility providers in the area. Table 62 provides a comparison of the impact fees imposed by local municipalities and utility providers, and the City of Schertz 2024 proposed impact fees. The City can decide to adopt lower impact fees than those established by this report, typically to spur more development, but should have a means to recoup the costs building the infrastructure to serve the developments. Table 62: Local Impact Fee Comparison City/Utility Total Water Wastewater Population Served (At the Time of Individual Analysis) Pflugerville (2023) $29,849 $14,713 $15,136 65,191 NBU (2022) $25,692 $19,448 $6,244 90,403 Seguin (2023) $16,558 $7,308 $9,250 29,470 Schertz (Proposed 2024) $14,369 $8,814 $5,556 45,719 SAWS (2024) $9,350 $5,987 $3,363 2,000,000 Austin (2023) $7,700 $4,800 $2,900 961,000 Boerne (2023) $7,629 $2,509 $5,120 18,232 San Marcos (2018) $6,485 $3,801 $2,684 68,217 Schertz (Current from 2011) $4,603 $2,934 $1,669 34,754 Cibolo (2021) $2,712 $1,839 $873 34,000 Sources can be found in Appendix 33. 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 81 6. LIST OF APPENDICES SECTION 2 Appendix 1 – 2018 Comprehensive Land Use Plan Appendix 2 – Zoning Map Appendix 3 - 30-Year Population Distribution Projections Appendix 4 - 30-Year Housing Distribution Projections Appendix 5 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 6 - Planned & Existing Residential Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 7 - Planned & Existing Commercial Development Comparison to Wastewater CCN Appendix 8 - Planned & Existing Commercial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Appendix 9 - Wastewater CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use Appendix 10 - Water CCN Service Area & Comprehensive Land Use SECTION 3 Appendix 11 – Near Term Water CIP Map Appendix 12 – 2030 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 13 – 2030 Water CIP Map Appendix 14 – 2050 Fire Flow Analysis Locations Appendix 15 – 2050 Water CIP Map SECTION 4 Appendix 16 – Flow Meter, Meter Basin, & Rain Gauge Location Map Appendix 17 – Dry Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 18 – Wet Weather Calibration Graphs Appendix 19 – Existing System Evaluation Results, Surcharge, & SSO Location Maps Appendix 20 – Near Term Wastewater Growth & System Improvement Projects Appendix 21 – 2030 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 22 – Max Depth to Diameter with 2030 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 23 – Sanitary Sewer Overflows with 2030 Wet Weather Flows Appendix 24 – 2030 Wastewater System Improvement Projects 2024 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Schertz, Texas 82 Appendix 25 – 2050 Wastewater System Growth Projects Appendix 26 – Max Depth to Diameter With 2050 Dry Weather Flows Appendix 27 – 2050 Wastewater System Improvement Projects SECTION 5 Appendix 28 – Inflation Rate Calculation Sources Appendix 29 – CIP Projects Cost Estimates Appendix 30 – CIP Projects Utilization Calculations Appendix 31 – Octave Meter Specifications Appendix 32 – Willdan Revenue Credit Calculations & Summary Appendix 33 – Impact Fee Comparison Sources APPENDIX 1 - 2018 COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN !"#$53 Æÿ9003 Æÿ4061 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ87 Æÿ2522 Æÿ284 Æÿ8151 (/09 !"#$01 Æÿ4061 Æÿ8151 Æÿ9003 Æÿ87 !"#$53 BEXARCOUNTY GUADAL U P E C O U N T Y COMAL C O U N T Y BEXARCOUNTY GUADALUPECOUNTY COMALCOUNTY SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SC H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHE R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHERT Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCH E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHE R T Z C I T Y L I M I T SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZ CITYLIMIT SC H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z C I T Y L I M I T S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHER T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHE R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJBO U N D A R Y SCHERTZ C I T Y L I M I T CIBOLOSELMA CONVERSE GARDEN RIDGE UNIVERSALCITY SAN ANTONIO LIVE OAK ST. HEDWIG NEW BRAUNFELS SANTACLARA SAN ANTONIO APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ II APZ I APZ I APZ I APZ I Clear Z o n e Clear Z o n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Z o n e A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I A P Z I Clear Z o n e SCHE R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y S C H E R T Z E T J B O U N D A R Y SCHERTZETJ BOUNDARY Cibolo Creek KINGS L A N D SHINOAKDR TO E P P E R W E I N R D G R A N I T E S H O A L S BEAV E R CR K PARK BENDDR BOR G F E L D R D S C H A E F E R R D S T O L T E R D H S T W F O R E ST BLF COUNTR Y L N W O O D GL E N W E I L R D R A N D O L P H BR O O K S P K W Y S P RIN G T O W N K R U E G E R C A N Y ON E AV I ATIO N BL V D JST W ELMTRAILDR OAKMONT B E N D SE M IN O L E P A S S C S T W N O R T H B L V D SUNRISECAN Y O N DR S C H E R T Z P K W Y L O W E R S E G U I N R D GOLFVISTABLVD U N I V E R S A L D R B R E H M L N FO U R T H S T E FIFT H S T W B O U L D E R V W E C K H A R D T R D S O U T H E A S T R D SCHOENTHALRD V E R D E P K W Y DAIS Y W A Y THIR D D R E KIN G S W O O D S T E N G E L R D FO U R T H S T W CIB O L O V A L L E Y D R THIR D D R W CHERRYHU R S T EAST PARK S T A R L I G H T L N NOR T H W E S T R D N O R T H P A R K C S T E NOR T H E A S T R D H A N O V E R P L A C E F S T W M O O N L I T R I D G E D R NORTHWEST DR EL M L E A F LN C O U N T R Y M IL L S O U T H W E S T R D GLENBRIARDR M A R I O N R D M A R I GOLD TRACE H A E C K E R V I L L E R D S C E N T E R S T N A B B O T T R D F O X B R O O K W A Y DUS T Y F I E L D S C O U N T R Y C L U B B L V D MAS K E R D LA N G D O N D R PARR CL E G G S T S O U T HERNWAY C H E R R Y W O O D L N R E D B U D W A Y MISTYRIDGED R BR I S C O R D H O L L O W R D G W E I C H O L D R D PVT ST ATIH 35 N GLEN TR L S C H O O L S T R I D G E L I N E R D E EV A N S R D O L Y M PIA PKWY LOOKOU T R D FO R U M PK W Y S H A D Y B R O O K E LANGL E Y B L V D ZUEH L R D S C H W A B R D CIBOLO T R L NORTHEASTDR DANA DR LOW E R V A L L E Y L N AL M O N D BEND N S O L M S R D W E N Z E L L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D HUNTERHTS S C H M O E K E L R D GIN R D LOST TREE M A RIC O P A P A T H S T R A T E M A N L N GR E E N V A L L E Y R D SENECACRK 3 R D A V E W R U E C K L E R D N E W B S T W W A L Z E M R D BR E T O N PA S S LIECK CV TR A I N E R H A L E R D C Y R U S M C C O R M I C K S E I D E L S T KITTY H A W K R D W S C H U L Z S T W A R E-S E G UIN R D T U T T L E ST S P R I N G T R E E H O L W Q U A R T E T T L N LIV E O A K R D LOV E L N ME L W O O D PL A C E LANDMAR K FALL S MON T G O M E RY DR S P O K E CIR PIONEE R POINT DR JIMMY W A L K E R PAT BOOKER R D R O S E S P U R P A R K N A N DINACT BU F F A L O C R O S S I N G AV E N U E A CANOPY B E N D I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D PEACEFULDR H O L L Y L N S H A L L O W CR O S S I N G A U T H O R IT Y L N OAS I S S T H O P E L N EL I W H I T N E Y W A G O N CROSSING S A G E O A K F O R E STRIDGEPKWY TR E L L I S W A L K O B E RNAIPATH MIR A M A R B L V D CIR C L E D R BL U E S P R U C E D R MOR N I N G S I D E D R WILDWINDPAR K VIS T A V W MEANDE R I N G T RL JAY B R O O K D R HIG H C R E E K R D GO L F TEE L O S T F O R E S T D R M Y S T I C T O P A Z HITC H R D ID L E W O O D F R IE N D L Y A C R E S EMMETPARK R U B Y R IT Z S T A C K S T O N E BR I G H T L E A F D R TOMKITE CT TE X A S D R BALBOAD R OAKBUD VISTA D R MINNIE S T BARRELSTAGE AU S T I N D R I V Y P O S T S PORT AVIAT I O N D R J U S TI C E L N HAR V E S T B E N D BRONZEROCK D R FO R U M R D PEACO C K L N R O U N D CR K HIKER S HOL W B EAVERELM KA Y L E E C H A S E 2ND AVE W S H A D Y P A R K L N OLIV I A R A Y C O R B E T T D R NORRISDRW B I N D S E IL G R O V E V E N T U R A B L V D CL O V E R L E A F D R SOMBRAHILL BEGONIA N E W B S T E TR A C E CR K 8TH S T BR O O K V W D E A N R D M IS T Y Q U AIL MAY F A I R HALF HOCK S T I L L B R O O K LN FAIR L A W N A V E L O N E S H A D O W T R L OLD AUSTIN R D 3 R D A V E E WEN S L E D A L E D R SECRETSHORES C H E S T N U T D R S T A D L E R C V SAHARA WOODS R I D G E PILO T M U L E D E E R W IL D R I D G E T R L W I L L O W HIL L PELICANPLACE S O U T H S T HUNTER S GLEN BOBBY J O N E S D R WHISTLER N L I V E O A K S T O L D E MOSS 1 S T S T THISTLE C R E E K D R C O T T O N K I N G S P O K E HOLW OAK C I R TO W N C R E E K W A Y CRESTWAYRD B U L L CREE K D R TIM B E R S P G S WOODVIE W DR SUN R I S E PASS GR E E N M E A D O W S CHAMPIONS P A S S B UTT O N B ALL D R BEAR OAK HINGEGATE MAR I L Y N D R RUSTYSPUR COL T T R A IL MOR G A N R U N V A L L E Y O A K DR W O O D B R I D G E W A Y GLENPT P RIVIL E G E P T L A RAMIEHILL R H O D E S BL A C K S T O N E C V HIL L VIE W L N Q U A I L D R W I L L O W BR O O K FF S T BR A H M A W A Y R Y E R D LON G C O V E D R COPPER W O O D S TW I N C R E E K F A R M D A V E N P O R T C A C T U S F L O W E R RUDDY DUCK FAR R I N LN N S A N T A C L A R A R D HEIG H T S V A L L E Y W I L L O W W A R B L E R U TIC A W A Y C O U N TR Y V A L E OSPREYLN POR T C H E S T E R L I B R A L N P A N O L A P A S S C O R D O B A D R BAL L I N G E R C A P R I L N VISTA PK W Y PHEAS A N T P E N I C K W A Y B S T W AS T W W H I S P E R CANY O N A S T E L O N E C R E S T L N B S T E H A R M O N D R AL A B A S T E R R O O S T E R R U N LAZY F O R E S T D R TUMBL E W E E D R U N S A D D L E H O R N W A Y Q U E E N S L A N D W A Y LIN D A L E E L N S T I R R U P D R E N C H A N T E D V W TR I A N G L E R A N C H CUR T I S S A V E FR E D C O U P L E S HAR V E S T S S O L M S R D TIMMER M A N C V I N D I G O B R U S H D R T U L S A T R L BR I A R K N O L L M O UNT LATM OS UNIVERSALCITY BLVD PE N C I L C H O L L A S P R I N G BR O O K A N T R IU M NATIONAL BLV D COPPER M I S T D A RTMO U T H C V OAKMEADOW S S A G E N I T E B R O O K H O LLO W D R C O R R A L F E N C E S I L V E R O A K C O R D E R O D R CAT T L E BEN D F S T E CO P P E R D A W N S W A T E R L N LIN D A C T WOO D L A N D O A K S D R EL L E R S T O N B L V D MIL L E R R D W I G E O N W A Y S A D D L E V I L L A S U N S T E M S H A R O N C T FORSYTHPARK W I T T E N ROLLINGBROOKLN R O A N CIR NU PECAN GROVE S U N BL O O M S P R I N G CIR S Y C A M O R E D R AUTUMN L E D G E C E N T U R Y F A R M D R S U N S H I N E FA L L S Z O E L L E R WAY L O N G L E A F P K W Y D S T E COV E HILL LONG I N G T R L C H A P S S T AMAL F I PAR K V A L L E Y F O R G E D R V E N T U R E W A Y W S A N ANTONIO S T R IV A R I D G E C IR H A W K C I R V I L L A E L M MOR N I N G R O S E S U NFL O W E R D R MACON AV E BR I D L E BE N D A G O R A P K W Y V A L E R I A D R ESTE RYE MOONCV PINEHAV E N DE V O N W O O D S T E A S T S T W A S H L E Y P A R K LAUR A N PAR K D R S M O K E BR E W L A C E L E A F L N F O R E S T R AIN W H I T E EL M V I L L A G E O A K D R R A T T L ESNAKE W A Y MOR N I N G D R TR E E CR O W N B R I A R L N WHITAK E R HIG HLAN D VIS T A Q UIE T V W 7 T H S T KEY W E S T W A Y THIR D S T W O R T H A V E MOUNTAIN BR O O K GOLDEN BEARDR W A T E R O A K FIR E C R E E K DR CR E T I A N IS L E G O L D E N O A K TIGUEX S U N D E W CIR W E L L B R O O K COCO MEADOW FORTYUMA LAUR A B L F FA L L E N S T O N E GAR D N E R C V TUL I P S T DAY L A N H T S S U N N Y B EN D C R E E K S I D E HIL L W H I T E TR L MCBR I D E BR I D G E B R O A D L E A F M E LIS S A C T F O R E S T C O R N E R BR O O K S H A D O W OAKTR E E C I R CL Y D E S D A L E R U N BOWIE C V COPPER FALL S PIS C E S C R Y S T A L V A L L E Y D R D E E R C REEKBLVD CANTER B U R Y L N PA R K F A I R G A T E SAVE R N E WA Y J U D IT H A N N D R CUTLER BR I D G E CY P R E S S PT S A N PA T R I C I O BLVD HIN G E F A L L S COPPER W A Y O A K P L A C E PINTALE PT TR A V I S D R BA Y H I L L D R TITAN PARADISE PASS DANE PAR K DOUGL A S S T D O C O L E N A GINKO CIR U L L R I C H R D S P R I N G T R E E BEND R O Y C E R A N C H R D AS T E R R U N P V T R D A T JE S S E S CIR SPRINGTREE CV BECKER S T W I L D MEAD O W CO LI N A W A Y COV E CR E S T HOPES HOLW MIS T F L O W E R D R BOOKERBAY H ORSES H O E T R L SANDHILL C R A N E D O R A L C T M A G N O LIA M A N O R S WILLO W W A Y HIDDEN GR O V E BL A I N CIRBL A C K PINE COR U M TR A I L D R CO P P E R NE S T S S A N T A C L A R A RD N O R R I S DR E C A N Y O N V I S T A C IT A D E L PEAK W HISP E R V W IV O R Y O A K D R MIS T Y H O L L O W D R K A R I B A C V SIL V E R T O N D R FIR E B I R D R U N SP O T T ED O W L SCARLET FIREDR KR U T H PT M E S Q U I T E C H A S E GAILCIR V I S T A D E NUBES A D ALIN E W AY BENING V A L L E Y TA U R U S CAD DIN G T O N D R R E D T I P D R EL D R I D G E D R MANO R S I D E BL A C K B R I E R DR BOG I E W A Y BRENDAFRANCES S P A R T A N TER R A C E IBIS AVE CHA P E L H I L L C R U S A D E R B E N D C R Y S T A L P L A I N S O U T H W E S T E R N AV E VALENCIALN CONCHO CR K COPPERSKY BERRY DR PAL O M I N O C V BITT E R W O O D D R CHUR C H OAK GR O O M S R D W I L D C H E R R Y WALNUTSPGS S U N S E T C V S C E NICC RK R E D R I P P L E AR A B I A N C R K FR I T Z W A Y PAR K L A N D S W A Y H I G HLAND G R AS S TIDELN O A K CT SCENIC D R W I L D C A T R U N C O Y O T E H I L L T H E B E S ZUEHL CE D A R CT IR I S H C R E E K R D TO W N C R E E K R D FIR D A L E FI R E S T O N E P K W Y PR E S T W I C K W A Y I R I S R U N CIR C L E O A K D R F O R E S T O A K W H I T E P I N E D R M E N L O RAILLN PINTAIL W A Y CRESTED HTS PR A I R I E L N FLINT R D AS H W O O D R D W O O D L A W N F A R M S P R AIRIE O A K COPPER R I S E SAR ATO G A PLAC E BR I A R MEADOW C Y P R E S S CT GARD E N CIR CHUOKE FALL I N G O A K D ST G A R DENARBOR PHE B E BLACKST O N E S L U M B E R L N DONSHIREDR COR O N A D O B L V D M C C O Y W O O D S W O T T O S T CAS P I A N BAY D R S H E R V I N W A Y A S T P V T S T A T T H E F O R U M OAK V A L L E Y GNAR L E D OAK W I L L O W C V MEADOW L A N D BR E E Z Y C V FO R E S T R I D G E D R MAR E PAS S W A L N UT B A SIN M I M O S A C T R I O BL A N C O MY S T I C W A Y GR A S S L A N D DR A Z U L S K Y C T W L A N G L E Y B L V D GLEN HTS BI N D S EIL C R E E K BR O W N O A K BINDS E I L L N AZAL E A G A T E JACQ U E L I N E S T F O R E S T S Q MANDERLYPLACE S T A L L I O N C V AL B A R E L L A SIERRASPGS PE C A N CT U T O PIA BLV D MER I O N W A Y CAN D Y D R HAGENW A Y AR N I E LN F O R E S T B R E E Z E M E S Q UITEPASS PAR K L E A F LAR K S P U R V W TRAILHOLW SC H MID T A VE S A G E S T E M STONEYCREEKDR KR I E R C V B E E BL V D L O M A VISTA ST MATTHEW S T L I S A M E A D O W S D E E R M E S A F O R E S T B R A N C H NIR A GOL F MIS T JOSHUATREE FR E E S T O N E O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D T OPPLINGLN CL O U D C R O S S I N G R E D H A W K B E N T W O O D R ANCHDR CARRICK C T AGARITA CIR TR E M O N T S T G A T E W O O D CL I F F LEAFY HO LW S T O N E Y P T W H I T E B R U S H CENTERBROOK LOCH L O M O N D D R A M B E R L Y C T V ILLAGEPARK P L U M R A N C H R D PE B B L E R U N BL U E B I R D HAV E N BY P A S S T R A I L S S A N D V E R B E N A A R R O W R I D G E STANLEY PARK S L E E P Y MEA D O W BALBOA PARK DAHLIA S T O N E B R O O K DRO GEL TH O R P E CI R CR E S T O A K D R H O C K L E Y H I L L VESOUL VALLEY PECAN S T AN G O R A T R L S P R I N G T R E E G A T E Q U I V I R A D R BARBAR A BEND L ACALA KEY L A R G O B L V D R O M A AFTONCANYON CIVIL C R O S SIN G PR I C K L Y P E A R D R L O O K OUT V W P E N SIV E D R B U FFLEHEADDR W A G O N W H E E L W A Y SONATACT E LEGION DR BIG H O R N T R L TIM B E R C R E E K D R CHER O K E E P A T H WHITEROCK A R A BIA NKING GATEWOO D B A Y N W ILL O W W A Y BOR D E N OAK CRICKET PLACE PILL O R Y P OIN T E JEANETTE DR A R B O R P A R K L N S A F A R I D R D A Y S T A R P O R T ER N I E W A Y GR E E N S T O N E CJ J O N E S C V H I C K O R Y H O L W M O N U M E N T P A S S M E S A V E R DE S A D D L E T R L W E I R R D B R I A R S T JONAS D R C ONGRESSIONA L B LV D PA R K V I E W D R FOR T U N E HILL G O T H I C D R GLE N NOO K D R D E L A W A R E PA R K S A D D L E CR K B RIS T O L O A K O A K R U N C I N N A B A R C T F A I R F A X D R W E B S T E R D R HINGE CHA S E BY R O N D R MEADOW V I E W D R BERR Y WAY PECOS P T S P R I N G MEADOW L N S E C R E TARIATDR K IM B E R LY DR COPPER C R E E K TAV E R N TR A I L D R S U N S E T H T S CAPEMEADOWDR C R A N B R O O K LIB E R T Y S O U N D R I M D A L E OLDANI DR S A S S M A N R D D O V E R U N BENT L E I G H DR D E V A C A D R BL U E V I S T A W I N D M I L L FALD O C V W B Y R D B L V D HO L L E R I N G V I N E GARDENNORTH DR J U P IT E R H A V E N HAY S P A R C R D CA S C A D E DR FETLOCK D O N O V A NPARK H O M E S T E A D P K W Y ROARINGSPG R U I D O S O CHAS E OAKDR TW IN B RA N CH B R A E S W O O D L N S T VI N C E N T W A Y DONALAN DR CHUR C H S T S A D D L E P A S S S P R I N G W O O D S Q C R Y STAL C A N Y O N W A Y N E DR BATTERYPARK PEAL E DR S A D D LE S P O K E NUHNW A Y H A R V E S T H I L L B L V D T R O P H Y C L U B LI B E R T Y H O R S E S H A D O W M T D R LANDMAR K HAV E N NORT H A L L E R T O N BR U N N I N G CT P L A N E LN C O L O N E L R D G G R E E N S H I R E D R MIDWELL CR E P E MY R T L E L N FAL L O N CT AL S A TIA N W A Y W W R I G H T B L V D W I E D E R S T E I N R D AESO PLN PA R K H T S P OINT VIE W DR F E R N M EA D O W DR HO L L O W GL E N KINGBIR D PL A C E SHADOW MOSSCT D E L T A D R W H I S P E R TR A C E KIL D A R E DE LA GAR Z A S T U R D Y O A K D R J A N I C E D R M O S S W O O D C O G HILL R O S LI N F O R E S T SIC IL Y IS L E PAL I S A D E S D R B E N H O G A N C T M A R O O N ST M I L L S T F L I C K A H I L L S CIBOLOHTS HILL T O P A V E AR R O Y O LOMA REDSKYCRK F S T ELOOP1604N ACCESSRD W I N G E D E L M H A R V E S T C A N Y O N EL K GL A D E R A N C H O HID A L G O MEA D O W S O N G BURROBEND S H A D O W Y C K PL U M A S D O E R R L N FA L C O N PA R K N L A V E R N I A S T CHUC K W A G O N C T ANDERSON B L F H A L L I E H T S MU S E S PE A L E C T ZOEL L E R CV N BA R N E T T S T LES L I E H T S S A V A N N A H D R MIC H EL L E T R A N C E L N WIE D E R S T EIN S T S O M E RVELL BACKNINE R A I N LILY L N DR A Y T O N U N N A M E D S T A T R A N D O L P H A F B BR I T E R D S U M M IT HI LL D R CL E A R W A T E R B L V D LAURALLN W I L D C O Y O T E T R L E A GLEEY E PE C A N PT CABALL O C A N Y O N E S C H U L Z S T B E L M O N T R D G S M O K E Y P O I N T E GATE BR I D G E H O Y A L N FELICIA F O X G L O V E PA S S E KR U E G E R S T KOV E LN BODECIR IV O R Y C R E S T D R HIL T O N D R C R O W N O AK W E L L D R E N C A N T O VISTA DR TRAIL DUS T L N S W E E T G U M L N SOUTHCREEK P V T S TAT A G O R A P K WY GLE N FOX TUR N I N G S T O N E MEADOW B U R S T M U L B E R R Y D R DOBIE B L V D NEW R O C K CR K M E A D O W S C A P E AUTUMN AR B O R R E D W O O D CIR S U N RID G E D R M A R I E M E A D O W T E R R A C O T T A POQ U I T O CIR F O R E S T F A R M TU MB L E B R O O K MEADOW F O R G E P A R K G L E N P RI M R O S E W A Y JAR R A T T MI S T Y W O O D L N WIL MIN G T ONWAY S T O R M Y B R O O K E M E L I A S T G L E N E A G L E S D R W A T S O N W A Y H O O T O W L S C E N I C LI N K S A R C H E S VALLEY S H A R P HIL L S E C R E T H O L W E HUEBINGER S T AARON LN S W E E T L E A F LN PAT S Y D R S H A D Y C V TR A I L S I D E L N E M E R A L D BL F S A R A T O G A K N O L L G A M B L E W O O D M E A D O W B R A N C H M A R I G O L D W A Y N O R T H L E D G E DR T ONNE DRE A N D E R S ONWAY W I E D N E R R D EASY MEADOW D R KER R Y B R O O K D R MU N S T E R DR S T A B L E H O L W MUSTANGCV F E R R E L L R D W I L L O W PATH W H U E B I N G E R S T I V O R Y C R K S P L I T O A K C R O O KED OAK GATE W O O D TR A C E W H I S P E R BR A N C H E KLEIN S T AUDREY R D G ISLAN D HOLLOW S A D D L E R U N F R I E S E N H A H N L N ANDR E W LOW R I F L E R O C K T E A K W O O D T R EE S U M M E R HAV E N L N BUFFAL O T R L V I R T U O S O P A SS FIEL D S W A Y V A LL E Y P A RKDR C O E R S B L V D BEACON GLEN COPPER R O S E W E S T C H E S T E R D R C H ESTNUT B LUFFDR LORIN G PARK ABER C O R N HINGE PATH G U S T Y P T GR A N A D A D R W I N D M IL L W A Y BL A C K H O R S E R I C H A R D S O N DR S T A L LI O N R A N C H FIS H E R R D APPLE SPGS F O R E S T C R O W N O A K S T BALL E Y PT T A L LOAK D I M R O C K L O N E S T A R W A Y IV Y M O U N TAIN PL U M CIR FRONTIE R R D G CHES T N U T BEAR W K R U E G E R S T HER I T A G E V W R O A N O K E D R R O U N D U P W A Y R A N C H HOUS E R D C Y L A M E N BL O O M BEND MOS S Y L N WAVIATI O N B L V D W I N G E D F O O T NOR W O O D C T S P R I N G F A W N S C O T T S BL F G O O D N I G H T C I R W H I T T M E N AV E ROUNDHAYPA R K REDBUDCIR IV A N D R N O R T H S T BL A C K B U T T E F O R E S T S U M M IT C H R Y S A N T H E M U M COPPER HOLW C A P S T O N E HIGHV I S T A MEADOWSPGS W H I S P E R M A N O R A M A R Y L L I S H A W T H O R N E P A S S LOUELL A D R S H E T L A N D P A S S SELESTAT PT G A T E W O OD F A LLS C O P P E R BLUFF SUNVIE W V A L L E Y BY P A S S CANY O N ANDRE LAS S O LN GRAPEVINEDR FUR L O N G GATE M A D I S O N C R K NIE M I E T Z C V H A R N E S S L N PIN T O P L A C E JAS P E R H I L L L N TH O M A S W O L F E W HIS P E R R D G L I V I N G S T O N D R BL A Z E M O O N T E N E V A C V W I L L O W TR E E S P A R R O W W A Y T A N G E R T E R R A C E S U N D E W M I S T PL A N T E R S P A S S R ET A M A C R O W N COPPER S A N D S FIS H E R S PATH TAR I N PT W I L L O W R U N KENS I N G E R P A S S PAIN T E D R I V E R V AL L EY P AS S EV E N I N G LAUR E L GAM B E L S Q U A I L G R A N D V I S T A C O L T C R O S S I N G CATTL E R U N R O D E O W A Y LANTANA S P G PARADISERD W A H L L N T R AIL B R O O K C R E E K R U N LOOKOV E R B A Y MI N E R A L S P G S BIS O N L N B E LMONT P K W Y ANV I L P L A C E S H A D O W W O O D L N S IL V E R W I N G I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D W H I S P E R G L E N B E T T Y J O E L N BR O N C O BE N D PEACEAVE TOMAHAW K CIR CL O V E R B R O O K L N GOEBEL M E T Z V A L L E Y PIO N E E R HILLS BEL L E G L A D E B L V D AN G E L S DR W LINDBER G H B L V D FA L L I N G S U N J U L I A N P T SPYGLASSCV C O P P E R H U R S T L O D E S T O N E S O A P S T O N E COPPER S P G IDAMAR I E B E R R Y C R E E K D R MAPL E D R DOVEWIN G MEDICINE R O C K HIG H T R A I L R D B A N D A N A S T FAIR T O N PL A C E PA S A T I E M P O BA R E B A C K BE N D KIP P E R A V E BL A C K H I L L S C T S L E E P Y V IL L A G E TW I N L N W A T E RFALLPASS S L E E P YLN O A K C R E E K D R BADLA N D BEACO N W I L L O W BL F EAS Y O A K CR K G A R D E NIA BE N D D R V INE L EAF DAKOTA CR K BL U E W I L L O W SEA HEADRIGDR CR I N U M LILY D R C R O S S B R A N C H D R HANOV E R CV PU L I T Z E R R D BILTMOR E MANOR A MIS TA D B L V D PINS E E K E R C R Y S T A L V W LAURELCRK R U S T I C A C R E S S U N S E T R D G W O O D S I D E W A Y L A R G O Z A A V E H O U R L E S S O A K S ANNDR CHELS E A D R R A N D O L P H A V E CR O W N CT R U S H C A N Y O N N M A I N S T S E R I CV R O S E R A L L Y W A Y MY R T L E T R L S U N S E T D R HOOS I E R PAR K F I R C I R KEY S O U T H W A Y PIONEER OAK TO P R I D G E L N W I L L O W V W A S H L E Y M E A D O W OZUNA DR WINTER F R O S T L A N D M A R K BE N D MERRYWOOD KEY N O R T H W A Y C LIN T O N R D R AIN B O W G LA D E ROAN ST BR I G A D I E R P A S S LIN C O L N D R THIS T L E DER B Y R U N P U R O O R O DR LOS T M A P L E S W A Y TAMAR O N HINGE CR K WILLOWDR Q UIET PIN E D E R B Y V I S T A LONE S O M E VAL L E Y VIG N E TTE COL E CR E E K D R CONV E R S E B U S I N E S S L N R E M ILLY W A Y POSEID O N S T O R M M T R D G A M BLE ST SUNSH I N E T RAILDR APACHE FOR E S T R O S E B U D V I S T A GR A S S Y T R L COR U M R I D G E D R S A D D L E N E S T C Y P R E S S W I L L O W CANTER B U R Y H I L L R U G G E D O A K S D R W E D G E W O O D D R GLE N S I D E MAY F L O W E R A P A C H E L E D G E FOGGY MOONDR AU R O R A S K Y TO W E R B L F FOR E S T W A Y C H IMNEY T RL S A R R E B O U R G S T KITT Y H A W K R U N S M O K I N G O A K S AUTUMN PLACE MCALIS T E R LN CHERRY HILLS CT K N E U P P E R R D E BY R D B L V D GOL F TR E E V E R B E N A G A P WHOOPING CRANE W HIT ESANDS SIR B A R T O N B A Y W A L T W H IT M A N W A Y L A UR A K ATH Y IV Y M A N O R LONES T A R GAIT TURKE Y T R E E C O Y O T E C R K AUTUMN ACR E S O A K PA R K MEADOWASHDR S A R D I N A DIV E R S E Y D R T I R R E MA G R A N V I L L E PE A K WOODLAKE TRL HID D E N M E S A S U N S E T T R L S L E E P Y RIV E R FE R N W O O D D R EL E G A N T E W A Y M A N D O L I N O L N N I G H T H A W K B O E I N G C O R N E R BIL L H A S S S T E P H A N I E G E E IR O N K E T T L E SIL V E R B U C K L E LANCER H I L L AR T E S I A W E L L S MOUNT A I N O A K C A P O T C O U RT LN CHESTNUT BLUE STONEFIEL D H I G H P L A I N S W A L N U T C R E S T W I N D W I L L O W G A T E W O O D M I S T I S T E D E P O S I T I O N G A P W I L L O W W O O D S T R A S B O U R G W A Y P E CAN G R O VEDR PIONEER T R L S U N R I S E R U N D R NOBL E W A Y D O L E N T E R D MA L L A R D CO R N E R BL A C K H A W K S K Y MEDIATOR R U N M C C U L L O C H G L E N N FA Z I O D R K R I E R C R O S S BY P A S S S H O A L S W I L L I A M S S T ERLINGVW W R I G H T C V ATHENIAN S T O N E Y B R O O K D R L A N D M A R K R U N CAMER O N R I V E R APPELL A T E W A Y F O R E S T P O N D C I MAR R O NC V BR O O K H I L L S U N R I V E R D R NOR T H E R N S T A R G W E N D O L Y N W A Y MESCALTRL NOR T H A V E N DR C O L LI N G W O O D W I L L R O G E R S D R TY LI N D S T R O M PADOV A FR I A R R O C K W A Y A N D E R S O N C V PF E I L S T W E E P I N G W I L L O W W E E P I N G O A K D R GILA BEND DIS C O V E R Y W A Y SNOW MEADOW DR BR O O K R U N ALTON BLV D W I L L O W CL I F F COPPER EL M D R TUR K I S H OAK N E L L D E A N E B L V D V O I R DIR E W H I T E H O R N D R O R IE N T A L T R L GULFSH O R E B L V D S U N S E T F L I G H T KR I E R L E D G E W I N K L E R T R L DES E R T R O S E W O L F F R U N S T R E A M C R O S S I N G C O L B U R N W A Y S A D D L E S P U R TR I P L E C R O W N SIL E N T C O U N T R Y S K Y H A R B O R F O R E S T E R B E N D HIDDEN CAV E BOV I S CT AUBUR N P A R K PE C A N B R A N C H COV E T R L R I D G E GAR D E N D R NAUMANN W A Y C H E S TNUTASHDR HAZELTINE W A Y G R A N I T E M IS T BUC K M O U NTAIN V I C K I L Y N N E A G L E V A L L E Y ST D IS C O V E R Y M IL L THR A S H E R TR L IR O N R I D G E PAS S G A L W A Y FALCON R I D G E D R R I M R O C K TR L R O C K HILLVW G A V E L PA S S C H E S T N U T O A K S I L V E R S P G S A W G R A S S B R O O K H EA D L N FOR B A C H D R M A Y B E R R Y M IL L H E M I N G W A Y T R L KE N S I N G T O N D R S P R I N G T R E E CIR BLA K ELY S T R E D B A R N R U N TR A C T O R P A S S W A Y S I D E T R L MES Q U I T E CIR L I N D B E R G H A V E PER I D O T MANDEV I L L A S U N S E T V IS T A D E W F A L L T R L O S A G E A V E S A D D L E C V MEDIATORPAS S S T A M PEDE R A N C H AR C A D I A P L A C E MIM O S A D R HAW K S M E A D O W S U N N A M E D S T A T N A TI O N A L B L V D DEER F I E L D B L V D RI D G E B L F S E M I N O L E D R DAL E W OODDR MUIR F I E L D W A Y PIEDMONT PL A C E AR C H E R S CO A C H H A R T L E Y S Q INKS W O O D MOHAWK D R N O E L F O R E S T W O O D C L I F F B L V D BL U E M O O N S P U R CHERYL MEADO W COPPER ES T A T E AL D E R S GATE OAK F O R E S T D R H A R V E S T P T G R A Y S O N CL I F F BRANCH HOLLOW DR NAV A J O C I R COPPER O A K KL O N DIK E C V GIV E R N Y C T EA G L E FL I G H T H O U S T O N D R C A R N O U S T Y D R R E D S T O N E M A N O R R I D G E FIR E LAS E R R A TU R F C L U B C H E R O K E E HIL L T U S C A N H I L LS DR W E E P I N G W A Y B O W I E D R D Y E S S C O R N E R C OW B O Y T R LOWL C R E E K R D S I O U X L N D E L M O NTE DR H O N E Y G R O V E C R O C K E T T A R R OY O V E R D E R O B E R T S T E V E N S PEAS E P A R K HIG H L A N D PL A C E EV E N I N G BR E E Z E ZUNI B E E C A V E S C V CR E E K S I D E D R PIPE GATE D U S T Y C R O S SIN G WAYWORDTRL DE A D W O O D R D G CA S C A D E S C V K E L L Y A V E TR U D Y L N DEAN CHA S E C O R T I J O LAHM AV E HE A T H F I E L D C A R L O W 5TH S T W S A N D Y O A K S S H EIL A P O N D GATE W A Y D R R E G E N C Y R U N AR I E S MAGICFALLS M ARIETTALN AL P I N O CR E N S H A W CT GR E E N M O U N T A I N D R COP P E R MOO N P E R I C L E S D R L O G S W O O D WENRICH COMMON L A W DOV E R GLADE SUSSEXC V PINENEED L E S L N H A R P E R R U N GR A N B E R R Y P A S S GOL D E N V I S T A D A V ENPO R T W A Y CAV A N BR A C K E N D R S M O KEY PLATTE S N I P S T A R W B O R G F E L D R D TOR C H W O O D D R J S T E W R I G H T A V E M E A D O W W I N D MIL L R I D G E R D W E R N E R S T AR A B I A N CV W S C H L A T H E R S T FU L T O N D R M U L H O USE DR R O T H A U D R R O S E W ELL P L A CE IV Y L E A F AV E N U E E BEE AL L E Y TR E V I N O DR W I N N A V E CHER I S S E D R C H A M P I O N O A K G UIL F O R D F O R G E BL A K E V I L L E W E S T O A K R A I NFALL RDG M E S A P A R KHER M E S D R S T R E S A TO L L E R D CL E A R MEADOW M E A D O W L N BIR K D A L E DR O A K T E R R A C E D R B E N C H T R L V A L L E Y HIL L L N R A I N E Y M E A D O W LN PER U G I A D O G W O O D L N BOR E A S W E L L S P A R K S U R R E Y L N IVY POND W E D G E D R R A I N B O W FALL S HERCULES S I L V E R R I V E R W I N B U R N A V E CL E A R W E L L WIL LIA M S C A R B R OUGH B O B W H IT E DR MEADOW H E A D D R W I N D S W E P T C V OLD CIB O L O VALL E Y D R R AW E A V E NOR T H E R N HEIGHTS D R ARROW VISTA L A L U N A S T A T E BLV D F O R E S T N O O K C T MIL L C R O S S L N L A R K S P U R C R E S T W I N D S O R C T RIV E R R D CINDERACOVEDR S U N R I S E FA L L S DEWBERRY PARK T E A G U E LN R O S E S H A R O N D R W E S T F O R K D R CAPR I C O R N S A W M I L L L N S T O R M R D G S T A TI O N S T MIL L E R S TR L M A P L E W A Y OVALMEADOW M E A D O W D R BL U E S A G E LN DALY C V G A T E W O O D B R I A R PVTSTAT PATBOOKERRD F I R S T S T COPPER G L E N MEA D O W HO R N D R J E R S E Y B E N D A T A LAYA B I G J O H N L N R O B E R T D E R R I C K COR K S U M M I T V W W I L L O W PO I N T E 2N D S T AR I S T O T L E 4TH S T E BR O U G H T O N SHE R W IN D R SUNPOOL B E R R Y P A R K C L OUDSP T 5TH S T E S C A R L E T C R K S A N D P I P E R D R R A M B L A S 6TH S T E V E R D E HIL L S MCCA R R E N PARK DE S O T O D R A RDENNESLOOP S O P H I E MAR I E BAR R W A Y O L D C O N V E R S E R D 1S T S T E 3R D S T E T U R N A B O U T L O O P S A L A D O SADDLE RDG G E O R G I A M A E S A S S I E LN M A P LE RIDGEDR IVY CURL HATCHMER E CT R U S TI C W IL L O W RH E W PL A C E PECAN FALL M O R N I N G D E W N HA C K B E R R Y S T KIN G S L A N D C IR WATER W O O D D R LUCKY OAKS TH I R D S T O L Y MPICDR THUR B E R D R N BE Y E R S T C O T S W O L D PE A R L C H A S E P E N I N S U L A D R B L U E L A K E R D G A R C A D I A D R MEADOW G A T E K E A N N A P L A C E B A R C E LONA PIN G W A Y S T R I C K L A N D R D BR I D G E C R O S S I N G Q U I E T C R E E K D R FOR U M ACC E S S N CU N N I N G H A M S T C H L O ECT P A S S E R I N A S P U R EL M A V E S C U N N I N G H A M S T CYPRESSMI ST DR VISTA PLAC E S M O O T H WINE B R ESSANIWAY FR O N T I E R CV N O R T H V I E W CIR PATR I C K H E N R Y DIET Z R D D E RBYD AN L A K O T A C T S L A V E R N I A S T H I D D E N G R O VE LN BE A C O N A V E E L F O W L N CE N T E R S T FO U R T H S T IN VERNESS W AY C O L O N Y GATHER I N G P A S S TH E S S A L Y N PA R K EA S T RADFORDTRL S P A R K W E S T S H A C K B E R R Y S T MOUNTAINSHADOWS FA L C O N BA Y OLMS T E A D PA R K CAS T L E CT EX C H A N G E A V E CALVERT ST S BA R N E T T S T WELLSFARGO S PA R K E A S T JUSTINOTRL KLINE CI R AR B O R DAW N L N KETTL E CV FOR E S T R A N C H C O R RIDORLO O P RD SUMTERGLADE AL A M O PKW Y WILDWOOD WAY H IRAM L N FIR E S T O N E DR S E R V I C E R D CIR C L E S T A R R D HI L LOCKS C V C HESTNUTCLAYLN N A T A L I E W A Y LA S C I M A S D R PALMETTOPARK AR I Z P E R D C A R D IN A L DR PL A I N S M A N R O B I N W A Y CROCKETTCV ARMOURDR EA G L E D R R O B I N O A K S C L O U D Y B R O O K L U B B O C K L N H A U S M A N W A Y G ATE W AY P L A C E GOLFBA L L G I B B S -S P R A W L R D B A P TIS T HE A LT H D R R I O MIS T D R NICHOL A S C V E M E R S O N P A S S W H I T E W I N G JUNIPERLN WILDHOLW C A S T L E C LIMB S H O R T S T R K L N D E E PHAV E N DR MO U R N I N G D O V E FIR E S A G E DY K E S L N O A K N O R T H D R KI N Z E L C T TR E E TO P L N J A S O N S W A Y ER I C A L A M A R S T AV E N U E B TIE R R A G R A N D E FLAGL E R B L V D PHANTOM CR K M O U N T C R E S T D R P IL O T P T D E E P S P RIN G P A S S LINDY H I L L S CHALKSTEM T H O M A S E DIS O N D R W I S T F U L T R L F O X G L O V E L N FAV E R O C V M A N D E L A N E D R PA R K L A N E C T S T E V E SAVE T R AIL VILLA G E D R S C O T C H R O S E L N S P R I N G T R E E FIEL D S P A R K L E P T B E N T W O O D P A S S W U E S T S T GLENCR O S S PITTS L N FIR S T S T W BL U E B E L L D R C A N D Y L N FOR E S T B R I A R JORD A N AER O A V E U N D E R W OODC T G R E Y F E A T H E R LING L N P O NY C O R RAL S A R A Z E N CT WINE GARDEN CREEK W O O D S T BETTYROBERTS APPELL A T E R I S E COV E R E D BR I D G E WINDING BLO OM A P P ALOOSA PASS MID-CITIES P K W Y B R U S H T R A IL BE N D CO V E B R O OK H A Y C R A F T BLVD CAMAR ON WOOD S LU D L O W TR L B A LTUS T R O L D R CHALK HILL CV TAMBUR O T R L K O E H L E R R D D R O W S E Y A V E LINCOLNWO O D D R S I P P E L A V E W U R Z B A C H S T FAL L I N G R I D G E D R MER I D I A N R O S E WOOD C V BOCA RATON DR REDR I V E R BAY MITCHELL AV E TIR E S T E S M AIN S T H O L LI W E L L B R ID G E T E S O R O P ERDID O B O W S P RIT PIE R CODY L N SKY CV HOR S E H O L W GOY A D A K O TA R U N W H I S P E R CV COP P E R CL I F F H A M I L T O N PL A C E RHONDADR S A N T A C L A R A S T TURT L E BACK D S T W BOLD CY P R E S S FOUR O A K S L N NAR R O W P A S S D R W H IS PER K N O LL FISHERM A N P O R T SE C R E T CV C OPPERK N O LL CEDAR BR I D G E HOR N E D LAR K H O R S E S H O E C V C H E STNUT CT B U R N I N G TR L E M E RALDPT G O L D E N M E A D O W S I L V E R T R E E BLV D C H U R UBU S C O D R H I GHLAND V W PARKMEADOW W I N D Y FA L K TA T T N A L L C ARDINALPT H O W A R D D R LEGEND R O C K W E T Z R D BR O O K OR C H A R D LIV E O A K CR O S S I N G P O R T ROYALST L ONGA C R E CIR R U S CV R A I N Y B R O O K AS C E N D I N G P O R T S U N G L A D E R A N C H GALLANT RIDGEDR R O S E M A N BR I D G E ROUNDT R E E D R EL M CT PE C A N H E R E F O R D S T DEER H O L W DUNCA N PL A C E M AT H O M D R SHADOWTRL LITTLE OAKS S T A M S C IR S O R E N S T A M W A Y U NI O N C R E E K D R KIT E C O R N E R FAR M V I E W S H O R T W E Y E L R D F R E S N O P L A C E AR M A D I L L O W A Y E B O N Y L N H E R A D R G A R Z A P L A C E B AY W I L L OW T R AIL S T E M M E A D O W C R E E K D R K O C H IN T E R M E Z Z O W A Y RANDOLPH A F B O L E A N D E R D R L AURELL N JUDS O N W O O D C O N C H O W A Y D R A R C H E R S G R O V E BR O O K S AV E MES Q U I T ECR K ECHOTR L BA N N O C KS D R Y E L L O W B A R K B L V D EA R H A R T L N W H I T E F I E L D EDITH F O R E ST C A BIN STABLEVW FO R ES TELF C H E R R Y B L O S S O M D R COY L N A U T U M N V W WOODLA K E P T GLENHAVENDR LEDF O R D L N HIGHLANDLAKE DR W A L D R D T A R R A N T T R L BA L A N C E D R O C K TIMBERTAP T R I N I T Y T R L NEW A BACA L L W A Y M E S A B R O O K R I D G E C A N Y O N D R W IN D Y B R O O K C A M P F I R E W A Y W E M B L E Y C V INVERR A R Y D R CHURCHILL AVE TR O T T E R T I M R A N C H CR K R A W H I D E W A Y L O S T M E A D O W S DR CANOG A MEADO W D A K O T A B A Y MIR A F L O R E S C A L L A W A Y P A R K WILL CLOUDESLEY IK E L N BR O O K W A Y RISINGSTAR M A R K E T T R AIL S T A L L I O N PA S S CONNELL POND BRIDG E M O N T PLA C E BU N K E R S T OS A G E CIR C O L T S B A Y 3R D S T W SPIRALWOODS HAVENMEADOWDR A B B E V IL L EDR GL E N L A R K W A R A D M I R A L MAPLE TREERD ME A D E S T L A Z Y DIA M OND P A T R O N V IL L A G E W O O D E D TR L L A U R A H T S W O O D DU C K 4TH S T W BR O K E N AR R O W BL A C K W A L N U T BRINWO OD E W R I G H T B L V D DAIS Y D R GLEN CR O F T OAKMONT DO W N S E LINDBER G H B L V D HINGE IR O N BINZ-EN G L E M A N R D GR A N I T E FIEL D TR A N Q U I L V W PUMPKIN R D G KR I E R V W R U N N I N G HOLW PR I C H A R D PL A C E GLE N LAK E R O C KY S H O ALS CLAY RIDGEDR CL E A R R I D G E D R HOL L O W OAK O A K W O ODLN S U M A C C I R VAL O N A D R OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D M O O N LI G H T C T SHALLOWBANK BL O S S O M CT IV Y J E T RID G E PEAK D R BU S I N E S S CIR S O R R E L L L N L I B E R T Y V W BU S I N E S S C T BAR R E N R I D G E D R S H A D O W C R E S T D R PAL O M I N O CANY O N BR E M E R S T R A N G E R O AK D A N I E L D R F O R E S T B RID G E HER O N FLATS CES S N A L N MAIN S T T R O U T R I D G E D R F O R E S T B O W OA K D A L E GATE CR E E K L N L O C K WOODL N E S E G U I N S T IV Y F I E L D R O B IN C V G Y P S Y C V JAS M I N E D R FALLEN PINE WOLFPRAIRIE MT LAUREL FOR E S T D A W N CIN N A B AR T R L G A V E L G A T E M E D I A T O R P A T H HARTCREST PLACE A V E R Y R D M I D A S PAR K V A L L E Y D R N E W COMBE D R T E N A C A T R L R I D G E NOR T H D R D O U B L E DIA M O N D J U L E P C H A S E BEL G R A V E W A Y FOR E S T A S H CR E E K V I E W OAKS HA D L E Y R U N G U A D A C O M A D R SPRIN GTREECLIFF G A T E W O O D O A K S D O U G L A S FIR D R F O R E S T C R O S SIN G JONQ UILL EAS T E R N FINCH FLINTR O C K W A Y N O R C R E S T D R H O L L E RIN G P A S S B L A CK O A K DR G S T W W ILL O WS R A N C H BARNSWALLOW KIS E R L N BE R E A N W A Y C H A S E F I E L D D R NOR T H C U T T R E S A C A G S T E M A D R O N E D R HAR P E R V A L L E Y D R CO P P E R R O C K CREEKRD G O O S E N W A Y W IN D Y RID G E T R L O AK R U S H QUEBEC DR AS H L E Y S W A Y W I L D CR E S T PR A I R I E BEN D S H A D Y M E A D O W S L N C O P P E R S T R EA M A L A M O D E R B Y B R O O K M E A D O W BRAMB L E W O O D CI R W L E G I O N D R M E A D O W O R E PIGEONBER R Y S O U T H L A N D AV E FR I E N D S W O O D PA T H W IN D Y P T RUSSWOOD CIR ABBOT S B U R Y SONNYRDG L I G U R I A D R P O PLA R A V E L UND YSLN AV E N U E D DOV E H I L L C H E R O K E E W IN D S L A S A L L E P L A C E S U G A R C R E E K ST IL I A D PECAN HTS S U N S E T S U M M IT OAK R D G M E A D O W S A G E C E N I Z O S P G CANHA M R A N C H GOL D E N W A Y HANS O N S FOR E S T KE R R Y IVYJEAN P O R T OFINO P L ACE WE S T CREEK D E E R M E A D O W HULL S T LILAC HILL G O L D E N O A K T R L GLE N CAS T L E HEY N I S S O U T H S P R I N G T R E E S H A D O W CY N T H I A AV E N U E F D O M IN G U EZ L N S U N D E W L N OVE R L O O K D R HICKO R Y LN G A R D E N S H O O T D IS C O V E R Y R IS E G A R D E N RID G E D R GLENAR B O R D E S T I N Y A C R E S R I P P L E W A Y PAIN T E D TR A C K S B E L G R A V I AF O R E S T HALF MOO N DR G U Y G U I S B O R N E PENNY PKWY LONGHO R N W A Y G O L D E N R O D C V B L O S S O M B L F J O D Y H TS MEADOWDAWNDR NORM A N CV H A P P Y T R L C A B A L L O R U N SL E E P Y T R L AV E N U E G O S A G E T R L D A P P L E D R S P LIT R O C K L N C ALAB RIA MAYFAIRDR M EADOWFAWNDR LEE C O R AL T R L R U I D O S O R A L L Y O A K KN O B W I L L O W C R K BLOSS OM CRK W H I S P E R P T CO P P E R C V ALTGE L T L N CIPR I A N I W A Y D O U BLEROCK MATS O N MAN O R TH O R N T O N L N W I L L O W O A K CHL O E D R R E D CEDAR C V LINDEN GR O V E D R VAN N E S T C I R SOCRATESLN N A F T A C I R CR I M S O N COV E D R AR R O Y O S I E R R A D E N N I S J U P E D R T R E E L I N E A C R E S V E R A N O D R GRA N D FORE S T D R S E C O N D D R E GLOX I N I A D R F L A G S T O N E D R C O N C H O PA S S AR R O Y O D E L S O L S T E E R L N MAR E W A Y BERRY KNOLLDR VIVIANDR W O LF R U N TUR N E R R D G MAIDMARIAN GLENBR O O K AR R O Y O D O R A D O INDIAN BL F GL E N P O S T ELV I R A A V E K R U E G E R R D G S U N D E W CR K BERRY TRACE OLD TOEPPER W E I N R D GR E E N T R E E DR RIDG E FLOWE R C H U R C HIL L C V C A B A L L O V A L L E Y L I G H T H O U S E D R AEG E A NW A Y FISHPOND RD LUNEVILLELN ANGUSW A Y B A T T L E L A K E W IS T O RIA C T W RI G H T L A N DI N G C O RSIC A D R C O P P E R S T O N E EASTERN CLOUDS OBBLIGATO L N AR ROYO SECO M T L A U R E L LN S E N I O R C I R SHININGGLOW W S E G U I N S T D O R I S D R AV I A T I O N A V E KR A M E R P K W Y N A C O G D O C H ES L O O P B E R R Y PATCH GLADY S AV E S A D D L E CANY O N M YRTLE RUN PR E S T O N T R L R U N N I N G BR O O K IN DIANHILLS C H E STNUTGATEDR SKYL I NE RIDGEDR H A R V E S T R D G PR I M R O S E M Y S T E R Y R D G MISTYFIELDDR D O W M A N S T D E E R CANYON D R H E A SL E Y P LA C E BILTMORELAKES TA R L ACD R LANDMAR K GATE W W E T Z S T CR E S T B L F B O W I E S K N O L L R I D G E BEACH DR W K L E I N S T E C H O RID G E D R FEATHE R LN O W L W O O D S V I C T O R I A N CIR C O L E T T E L N 1S T S T W AUGUS T A GLAD E ELKTRL TAG LN CU B D R B U B B LIN G S P RIN G S R D CE D A R B R U S H R D S A H M P A S S DE E R R U N AS T E R C I R D US T Y E M E R A L D REDOAKCV REBELGROVEDR KINGS M A N S T BIR C H S T S P R I N G T R E E T R L AZAL E A C I R AUTUMN FALL BR O O K S H I R E LIBER T Y R D DR E A M A V E MEADOW GR E E N C O T T O N S P I N D L E PINE ME A D O W D R SUMACC V M O SSR I D G E LARMONACV VONDELPARK C A L LEYCIR HAR R I S O N OAKS COR R I D O R OAKS GR A N I T E W O O D S R U N A W A Y C R O W N H O L L Y F O R E S T TR O T T I C V BL U E M O O N GAIT COR R I D O R P K W Y M U S K O G E E B E N D L E M O N W O O D A V E SC O U T P T M I S S I O N H IL L S D R FL O R E N C E G R O V E BE E C H W O O D A V E H E Y N I S N ORTH S C O T T A V E BL U F F S I D E B L V D MARATHON P A S E O C O R T O D R D E A R B O R N D R P O I N T E L O O P W O O D L A N D C V F O X L N A P A C H ECIR IV Y D O V E O L D E N G E L R D NATU R E P A T H HIL L L N GOL D E N R O D L N C A N D L E B E R R Y D R C H E S TNUT MAN ORDR P R I V A T E D R S A F E H A R B O R A L T A MIRANO IVYHORN S T E E P V A L L E Y E C H O L N M ISTY A R B O R D E L L L N FAIR L N Y O R K L N EDENGR O V E D R S C H U E T Z D R S P Y G L A S S TIAR A D R AL B R E C H T L N CEDA RWINDSD R MCHEN RY DR IVYFLOWER W I L L O W L O O P 6TH S T W A Y A L A L N L Y R I C L N M E E K S T CORONARDG DOW N I N G S T T URTLE D OVEDR POR T A G E L N O R C H A R D G L E N AS H L N W I L L O W W I S P R D G L E N N L N F U R L ONG TIGERMEADOW B E T H A N Y D R D A G A M A D R WINDVIEWWAY BLUE GOOSE C E D A R L N CHENEY R D PO P L A R G R O V E L N ROVEENTRL GLEN HILL S P RIN G T R E E G R O V E T RONAMINE I S T W LAKE HIGHLANDS O L I V E A V E V I S T A D E L R E Y SUN S H I N E TOW E R D R LUCILL E PVTRDAT 9275WEICHOLDRD Y O U N G A V E IV Y J A D E KISSENAPARK F I F T H S T P RIZEDPONY BAL D WI N PA R K BRINSONCT R H O D I U S L N M A R T I N E Z PA S S A D R I A T I C F O R E S T PAT H BORMANN DR MOUNTAIN HOME C RIS T O B A L D R BIR C H B E N D G R O V E PL A C E SEASCAPEL N UPPER S E G U I N R D M E A D O W S T O N E R A L E I G H D R A N D E R SONC T M E A D O W PE A K CHR I S T I A N S TEE MAS O N C R K M E A D O W DA L E W INDWAY CRK D E R B Y R A L L Y R O U N D R O C K W A Y COPPE R ME A DOW P A R K L A N E D R B E X A R B O W L I N G I H 1 0 W R A M P L A Z Y A C R E S L N L A W R E N C E L N G O L DE N R O D C I R S T A N U S H R D M E A D O W W A Y EL B E L R D SPRIN G T R E E L N HOGAR T E N PAR K E L MONTE BLVD B E T H P A G E CT F A I R V I E W D R D A N C I N G AV A S Z 0 2 S E R V I C E R D S E N N A H IL L S D R CINNAMON TEAL SHERRIDR S C O T S E L M R O Y A L D R T U R N BERRY D R F O XRUN TR A N Q U I L L O W A Y S C O R D A T O DR CONCER T O DR NO R T H M E A D O W C O P P E R S I D E K N O L L W O O D GLE N C V VILLADR BL A ZIN G S T A R T R L SPANISHOAKDR C E L T I C AS H R U N CL Y D E S D A L E S T W S C H A E F E R R D COMANCH E TR L CL A P B O A R D R U N W I N T E R R D G Q U A R T E R M A R E G R E N A D A G A I T E R STEIN VALLEY A P P A L O O S A R U N FAL L E N TR A I L D R CY L B U R N PA R K D R S H ADOWCREEKLN B E N T B R O O KDR W A R R I O R TR L VALENCI A R O Y A L H O R S E BAR K E R CY P R E S S M E A D O W H I L L S T A R CIR TU R Q U O I S E M U N T J A C S T S E C O N D S T W W E S T E R N TR A I L D R SOUTH E R N RIDG E D R M O N I C A S C R K S E C O N D D R W BOW R I N G PAR K SIL V E R R O S E FIR S T D R E FIR S T D R W S E C L U D E D D R FAUL K N E R D R S E C O N D S T E THIR D S T E C O O L SAND SDR S H A D O W LAW N C I R C H ELSEA P L A C E P V T R D A T F M 4 82 REDMANPASS BRANDYWIN E CV P E S A C V BLA C K B U C K E N CHANTE D OAKS N OT C H L E A F AUDUBON PAR K S A D D L E H I L L H E N R Y F O R D D R PE T E R S O N L N S T A N D I N G OAKS NATUR E T R L GLENBORO AP A C H E R D G TAT E L N H A M P T ON H I L L S S T E R L I N G W A Y UNIONSHOALS SCARLET TANGER S E L M A P K W Y L E G IS L A TI O NDR BU R K W O O D L N S U R N A DP L A C E HU N T E R O A K S A N D O R R A D R B R A N D I N G TRL SPRINGTR E E RUN S H E R L O C K L N R I D G E P O R T D R COLUMBIARIDGEDR B A Y M E A D O W S ST T W I N P O I N T C R K GLEN HAR T S N O W Y EG R E T IR A D R GRE E N GRANT BR A N N O N L N CELESMEADOW W I LDTRACE W H I S P E R O A K WOMANHOLLERINGRD MUS T A N G MEADOW E L M DR OAKBREEZ E ABIGAIL ALCAN F O R S U N F L O W E R S T IN DIAN B L A N KET S T GLEN MANOR W I L L O W B R A N C H COPPER TR A I L D R B O A T M A N PIER CONV E R S E CENTER B A S S F A R M R D BAUGH LN LA J O L L A TEAKW O O D D R K L EI N CIR S M O K E Y C R K M A N NINGTONPLACE R I C H M O N D PAR K AS S E M B L Y C I R TR U M B A L CALE DR TIF F A N Y L N W O L F F V I S T A SCHMID T -C R AFT LN PAC E R L N S T R AIG H T LN MAR B E L L A C O M A N C H E R D G W E S T E R L Y P L A C E C R E E K S I D E D R GAR D E N MEADOW P V T R D A T 1 5 4 9 7 L O O K O U T R D CHESTNUTCEDARDR FALCON CR O S S I N G I O L A S W A Y HIDDENFAW N MEADOW S K Y MEADOW V W BR I A R F I E L D C R I M S O N TR E E C A S T A N O CV CHESTNUT CAPEDR MINERALSWAY C R E S T W O O D D R MADR I D D R G R E E N BL U F F D R S U N R O S E L N S A D D L E V I S T A C A L L A L I L Y MIST Y C V GUL F S T AUTUMN DAW N B R O K E N S P U R Y U C C A P A R K CA S T L E H I L L DR BR A E S C O R N E R G A LL A N T F O X D R D O V ETRAILDR B U C K B O A R D L N S A N A U G U S T I N E BL V D MIS T Y A S H KIN G L N BA R K W O OD KAY L A L N PAINTE D R I D G E D R CR O S S P L A I N S S Z 0 1 S E R VI C E R D R O C K Y T R L G R E Y S O T O L W A Y W I L L O W CR E S T MEADOW R U E S T O N E Y B R O O K DR S E C O N D S T Y E A G E R C I R PI N E C O N E C V C E D A R G A P C A L E R A C V FR E A D L N SI E R RA P A S S BOLER I O D R COPPER BROO K FL O R E S L U N A R D PL A Z A D R CAMPUSDR IR O L A D R C A B A N A D R LITTLE S U G A R C R K KEYWINDYWAY H U I S A C H E H I L L S T R O L L ING LN R O B I N D R BR I S B A N E R I V E R S U TH E R L U N L N LI M E S T O N E MILL D R D E L A I N E P A R K C O P P E R K E T T L E EL M S T CAR M E L D R A P P A L O O S A O A K H O R S E B RID G E CLEAR W O O D PATH HANGING MOS S D R R O C K COV E L N MUS T A N G V W IVY MIS T Y MASONVALLE Y D E E R G A R D E N C V H A S TIN GS P A R K LENOWAY KU R R E W AY Q U A K E R R D G N E M E C L N C E D A R C A V E R N G A L L O PIN G O A K SPRING WILL O W NOMAD LN TO M M Y T R A I L D R R O X A N N E L N O M A R D R S H A Y P A S S BULW A R K P E A K R I V E R B R O O K D R V A L L E Y M E A D O W LEADING OAK S HAR B O U R T O W N R A C E W A Y D O W N S W HIS P E R F I E L D CACTUS P A T C H C A N SIG LIO KEL I W A Y BR O O K B E N D R E N E E D R S H A DY O A K L N TU R F W A Y P A R K KILGOR E D R R H O D E D R FAR L E Y D R MAL D E N D R H E A V E N L Y V W TOR O N T O D R INTER L A C H E N BU C K S K I N W A Y PIPE S T O N E P R A I R I E V I S T A R O S E G A T E D R B O R W I C K L N BE A U F O R T B L V D BR I S B A N E D R BL U E S K Y R D L A Z Y O A K D R BE L L I S T E R S T KUS M I E R Z R D C ST E L AIN E S S C H L A T H E R P K W Y SWINDOW CIR S U T T E R S M I N E T A R R A N T H I L L P O S E Y P A S S PARTHENONPLACE THOR E A U T R L M C C O Y L N MEADOW T O P BR O W A R D A V E ELDORADO SUN LIT T R A IL DR J O S H S W A Y PETUNIA AV E N GR A Y T O W N R D W H IS P E R I N G OAKS E G L I N G TO N W A Y FLINTS T O N E L N P A T H FI N D E R GINS B E R G D R LI M E S T O N E MESA LEDGEBR O O K D R FAIR I N G T O N D R R U S T I C T R L LINCOL N V I L L A G E D R NUGGET CR K S T E A R M A N L N W I L L O W TOP DR TU S A Y A N I S T C E N T E R F L O WERTRL W H I T E T A I L P A S S M C M O R R IS B L V D CA S C A D E R I D G E D R S C H R A N K O A K S R O N R D W IS HIN G O A K S W A Y ANTIQ U E O A K D R G A V E L D R E N C H A N T E D F A R M IN DIA N M O U N D SEARIMDR TA P W O O D L N BR O O K S T O N E DAKOTA R I V E R R E D H O R S E PA R K BU C K H EADLN M U N I CI PAL PKWY D U S T Y L N CIBOL ODR N OTTIN G S H IR E COTTONTAIL LN S I L O S T FAW N P A S S S A D D L E B A C K T R L COTTON PATCH LAU R E L CA N Y ON D R F A W N D R S A M A N T H A D R ES K I M O F O R E S T K R I E W A L D L N S T A G H O R N M ILL SAHARAST O N E D R MEY E R S A V E O A K MARSH T R L R I D G E M O O N BOUL D E R D R ANTL E R D R S C H M U C K S R D S P R I N G T R E E B L F ODY S S E Y D R M A X F L I D R G R E A V E S L N IH 35 S R A M P H A N A L N HID D E N O A K T R L DIAMOND FAL L S RITABLANCAST PEAC H L N D U K E W A Y D R CL E A R B R O O K A V E SH O W D O W N P A T H S N A K E W E E D D R IN G L E W O O D D R FAW N R D G K E S T R E L OAK F O U N T A I N G A T E EA G L E S G L E N N R A L S T O N D R QUIET M O ON DR R E DIRON M IC H E L L EHIL L HILL S I D E E S T A T E S FOR T W A Y N E BR U C K S D R MONTANIO DR W H I S P E R B L F AUTUMN V A L L E Y M A R G IE'S LN W H I S P E R H A V E N TR I T O N G R A N D K I D L N COUNTR Y V W CIBOLO TOL L E R D BL U E F O R E S T D R S C H N E I D E R D R GRIMCHESTER D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D P A W T U C K E T R DWINDINGTRL L E G A CYOAKS P K W Y AMBR O S I O L N JAMIE S U E D R B U FF A L O D R ER N A D R BR I D G I T D R DEBOR A H D R NEW B E R L I N R D GR E E N M E A D O W D R BEV E R L Y D R LOR I L Y N N D R FOSS M E ADOW ZODIAC DR C H E Y E N N E B L F PECAN DR W I L L I A M S B U R G D R BOX E R P A S S D R C AVERN O A K R I C H M O N D D R GETTY S B U R G D R ANDREWS A V E R O S E W O O D D R C H E R O K E E R D G E OTTO S T S I O U X C I R CORAL MEADOW M U S T A N G V A L L E Y J O N S W A Y HA R V E S T C R E S T MIL L E R L N W A L N U T MILL D R R I F L E G A P R O S E L N R E D O A K T R L CEDARBR A N C H L O U A N N D R PIER S O N L N O A K L A N E D R BU L L D O G D R NORTHLAKEPA S S PFEIL R D G A L I C I A AR A N D A L N S A G E D R COMMER C I A L P L A C E BECK S T TEAKW O O D L N S U M A C L N FA L C O N D R DW L N IH 35 N R A M P BR A C K E N C R E E K D R A U T U M N H O L W H A R V E S T V W W U N LE S LN CHAR L E S T O N S T A P P E R R D MIC KES C H LN FAR M V I E W L N TAT E S D R FOX B R I A R L N G L E A M IN G S P RIN G S D R MARTIN E Z- C O NVERSE W I M B L E D O N D R C R E S C E N T B E N D D R TE X A S V A L L E Y INDU S T R I A L D R W A R E - S E G U I N L O O P M O O N L I G H T M E A D O W S D R C E D AR C R E E K D R OAKS I D E BO N A N Z A L N LAKEVIEW D R PVTR D AT SCHUETZDR CAFFEY R D CL E A R O A K A P G L N PV T R DATCO Y OTE R U N HIGH OAK BR I S B A N E W I N D Y M E A D O W S D R HIL L B R O O K R D DAV I D L A C K B L V D CONCOR D I A L N DEBBIE DR DOR E E D R BE N E K E I T H W A Y H O M E S T E AD DR CIN C H O N A T R L TONNE DR W OPIE LN D E N-OT T HIL L B E L L N O R T H D R T RIP L E L L N JETHR O L N E S C H A E F E R R D TAIL D R A G G E R L N EBER T R D HAECKER F I E L D S FR O B O E S E L N H U B E R T U S R D S C H N EID E R L N W IL D H O R S E P A S S P V T S T A T E N G E L R D S K Y L O O P CATTLEMANS L N N O R - T E X D R S T O L T E A C R E S BEY E R P A T H G E R D E S R D S PERIMETER RD RETAMAPKWY OLD GR AYTO W N RD PV T W P E R I M E T E R R D W E S T P A R K S O U T H P A R K B RIC K E L L R D GATE W A Y B L V D FLATSTO N E P A S S FIFT H S T E WASHIN G TONCIR KING S W A Y R O B I N G A T E O L D C I M A R R O N T R L NORTHW E S T THRUWAY S C H U M A N N R D N E VANSRD OLDSPANISHTRL D O U G H B O Y CIR C O L U M B I A S T A N D R E W S INNEROCTAGON P H O E NIX A V E BOLTON R D C O CONUTPALM OUTE ROCTA G O N P A R K O F FI C E A U T U M N R U N L N FOREST HOLW W I L D E R N E S S T R L M A I N C I R R Y D E N D R O A K M O N T W A Y FM2252 TR I - C O U N T Y P K W Y C H E L S E A CIR P E R SI M MON D R MORNINGGROVE G R E Y C LIF FD R C O V E R E D W A G O N F E R R Y S A G E D R R U S C H L N FAIR W A Y S D R WELCOMEDR B R U S H C R E E K D R VI C T O R IA PT BEECH TR L LONECYP R E S S A U T U M N F L O W E R TIV OLI G A R D E NS AUTU M N BR O O K C H I C K A S A W B L F BEN T T R E E D R A Z A L E A W A Y PEBBLEBEAC H CHESTNUT B A R R GR E E N R I D G E SERENERIDGEDR L I E C K S T CO P P E R G A T E Y E L L O W W O O D DR MUS T A N G CANY O N S P I C E O A K L N TR E E BR A N C H C U R L I N G P O S T D O V E M E A D O WS M O S S H O L L O W C T W O O D L A K E V W T E X AS PAL M D R TILDENTRL S H A W N E E B L F A M E R I C A N F L A G COMAN C H E P A S S FE ATH ER STO N E DR OAK BL O O M TI M B E R R O S E D R R E D R O C K P A S S IRONMILLCRK G O L F R D BUCKIN G H A M V I L LAGEST G R E E N W O O D MAIDENWAY DEER MEADOW BLVD AZTECWAY W I N D B U R N TR L S P R I N G T R E E P K W Y L O F T E D L E A F M OUNT OLYMPUS R H I N E L A N D D R PEPPER T R L C O M M U N I T Y D R BU C K S C I R FORR E S T TRL T U R N B E R R Y W A Y EVERETT LOOP IN DIA N CIR C O M A N C H E PATH L O N G H O R N R I D G E D R VISTA FAIRWAY BA T C A V E R D FIEL D B E N D G R A S S H O LL O W D R HIDDEN HILL S N AS H L E Y O A K D R A NTIETAMDR W HIT N E Y W A Y BAT C A V E L O O P C O R T E S D R R O BIN H O O D W AY HIN G E L O O P C H E R R Y T R E E D R TR A N Q U I L L N S TO R M KIN G S C E N I C V I S T A IH 35 S A C C E S S R D S P LINTER E D O A K L U C K S I D E KRIERCT PE V E R O J A N E T L N BR A N C H I N G PEA K V A L L E Y O A K Q U E E N V I C T O R I A D R S H A D O W YDUSK CANARY M EADOWDR COPPER MESA BENTBRIDGEDR C H E R O K E E B L V D PIN T O C R K CO P P E R L A K E M A P L E M E A D O WDR D O LL Y DR R A F B U R N E T T E MACARTHURWAY MIS S I O N CR K G O L L ST ANDERSON CHASE R E D I R O N C R K MIS T Y M E A D O W C A N Y O N O A K DIANA D R R I D G E M I L E O L D H A M C L I F F L A N D M ARK P A R K CHERRY GLADE STERLINGMANOR MUSTANGRDG D IS C O V E R YDR M E A D O W LA R K PVTSTAT A RMYRESIDENCE SP R U C E RID G E D R BELFORT PT FALCON MEADOW R IO VIS TA D R BA Y T H O R N E C O A S T R I D G E D R O L D E V A N S R D J A M E S A G E E D R TRUMPETCIR COMANCHECIR PEA C HTR EE LN DIX O N R I D G E D R GUNTHER G R O V E HABERSHAM S H A L L O W R D G PO N D APPL E BRENDA DR LODGE P O L E LN S A N D H I L L D R W A G O N T R A I N ENCAN T O P O I N T D R FIR S T S T E SHININ G E L K CHIPPEW A B L V D S B E Y E RST K E N T U C K Y R D G SUNCLIF F D R R I D G E EL M D R Y CANYONTRL FRANKSRD B E N T MEADOW DR G R O V E P A R K B S T HANOV E R S K Y BE L M E D E C T V A L H A L L A A S H D R W A Y W A R D P A S S DEME T E R L L O Y D S P A R K JANE ADDAMSDR C A R D I F F FAR M V I E W L O O P N LOOP 1604 E ACCESS R D PFANNSTIEL L N F M 3 0 0 9 A C C E S S R D MAT H O M LA N DING DEDEK E D R IV Y M O O N QUIET NIGHT LN S ILVE R F O X LEGEND POINTDR FAR W EST DR V A G A B O N D L N V IJIL L O O P FR A N K B A U M D R M E D U S A UL Y S S E S W E S T O N R D R O T H B E R G E R W A Y TR O P H Y O AKS D R REGA L OAKS D R G R E E N B R O O K PL A C E NOR T H V I E W DR MEADOW AR B O R C O V E R S C V ST L O U IS W A Y S N O W G O O S E HICK O R Y B E N D TONKA W A PA S S R A NDOLPH PLAZADR CO V E NTRY COVE D R ABA C C U S CT I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D P O R T R U S H L N SEA WILLO W D R R O Y A L T R O ON DR K A U RI C L I F FS CL I F F S I D E D R R E B A C R A R Y M E A D O W T O R R E Y P I N E S ZEPHY R C V AUTUMN WELLS B O ENIGDR VASSOVW J E S S E S C I R SELDON TRL WIND SOC K LN B R O O K L I N E PARKVIE W D R HIL L S I D E T W I N S A D D L E S R O C KR U N BIR C H W O O D C I R S A N D Y RID G E C I R BU F F A L O P L A C E D R Y W O O D R A N C H M Y R T L E G L A D E R H E A S T SERVICE DR N O 1 W L A G U N A HIL L S FR E U D E N B U R G R D BISMARCKLAKE S T O N E G A T E D R R I D G E MIS T D R M O N T E S A C T R O B B I N S G L A D E SIL V E R TE R R A C E N E W N I N G R U BENSDR H A N S E L H T S UNIONTER R A C E G R E E N HE R O N PUTTER CO P P E R MO U N T A I N PVTRDAT 9305WEICHOLDRD ESTRIDTRL AB B E Y R D DAULTO N R D G SERENEHILLS SWIFTLN M A I D S T O NE C V CAN T U R A M I L L S PE G A SUSDR VILLAG EGR E E N GR E E N V A L L E Y L O O P FLATLANDTRL J O U R N E Y S W A Y C O Y O T E R U N H A M P T O N P A R K C H E R R Y H I L L R V D R 1ST A V E W KING O A K S D R S P A N I S H O A K W E S T W A Y D R E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N GUADALUPE DR HILLV I E W D R F O X F O R D R U N D R CORINTH C O R P O R A T E D R FAIR V I E W CIR FLAMING R I D G E D R N I K E C I R W A G O N W H E E L PA W L I N D R GA N D E R PA R K S H A D Y C R E E K L N MONMOUTH LEVESQUE L N ARCHER BLVD TRAPPERSRDG AP A C H E B E N D D E W D R O P L N BR I S B A N E BEN D O R O V I E J O C T MARGARITA H IL L JANOE LN V I A POSADA D R PINE V A L L E Y D R OC E A N M E A D O W D U S T Y R D G M A R B A C H L N Q U A I L W O O D R U N COLDMOUNTAIN DAVIELN TW I S T E D O A K S A G R D S C E N I C H I L L L N B R U S H TRAILLN C R E E K L O O P BL A C K S M I T H W A Y T R A I L I N GOAKS B I E D I G ER L N OUTLAW BEND PIG AL L E Y BLUEPT CIBOLO BEND VOGES PA S S VIGILANTE TRL S C E N I C L A K E D R PARK D R CATTLE C R E E K L N S A N T A C L A R A L O O P C A R R A N Z A L N BETHANY W A Y G ARDENOAK S D R A R R O W O O D P L A C E COMMUNITY CIR M E S Q U I T E W O O D S S T A L L I O N L N U L T R A LI G H T R D RIO C I B O L O WAY HOL M A N R D S T E P H E N S L N NPERIMETERRD EPE RI M E T E R R D AUTUMN AR C H PAR K L N IV Y L N HIGHGATE R D W A G O N R D R E A L R O C K R D TALKENHOR N FORESTWATERSCIR LEWIS RANCHRD P V T S T A T T H E F O R U M IH 35 N ACCESS RD PVTS T AT TH E FORUM 0 ½1 1½2¼Miles BexarCounty GuadalupeCounty ComalCounty R ural Frontage S ector Boundary Air Installation Impact Air Installation Compatible Civic, S chools Main S treet Commercial Commercial Campus Highway Commercial Industrial Industry, Technology and R and D Parks, Open S pace Agricultural Conservation Estate Neighborhood S ingle Family R esidential Multi-Family R esidential Manufactured Housing Mixed Use Neighborhood Mixed Use Core TND/TOD Transition 1% Annual-Chance Flood Event ComprehensiveL and Use Plan S chertz Municipal Boundary S chertz ETJ Boundary County Boundaries R ailroads Major R oads Minor R oads Proposed R oads Air InstallationCompatible Use Zone APZ I APZ II Clear Zone“The City of S chertz provides this Geographic Information S y stem product "as is" without any express or impliedwarranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.In no event shall The City of S chertz be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connectionwith the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or ty pographical errors. Periodicalchanges may be made and information may be added to the information herein. The City of S chertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s)described herein at any time.” Last Update: February 20, 2018 City of S chertz, GIS Coordinator: Tony McFalls, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1184 APPENDIX 2 - ZONING MAP PVT F M 4 8 2 E P E R I M E T E R R D C R E E K R D K O E H L E R R D W P E R I M E T E R R D W E T Z R D W E S T O N R D G O L F R D G E R D E S R D S T O L T E R D F M 7 8 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P A T H E L B E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 E O PIE L N F M 7 8 N O R -T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR B U N K E R S T D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E T T E T RIP L E L L N H U B E R T U S R D S T A P P E R R D F R O B O E S E L N V O G ES PA SS F M 7 8 E A S T O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D PFANNSTIEL LN C A F F E Y R D F M 2 2 5 2 S C H W A B R D W E I R R D ABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R C A L E D R RETAMA PKWY M IL L E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R L O O K O U T R D M A S K E R D S C H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A L L E Y R D P I P E S T O N E ARIZPE RD T O L L E R D B O L T O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D G IN R D K R IE W A L D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D S M AIN S T W A R E - S E G U IN R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N FIF T H S T E SHAY PASS F M 7 8 WE F M 1 5 1 8 N MID A S W IE D N E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D K I S E R L N FM 1516 N H A E C K E R V IL L E R D W A L D R D F M 2 5 3 8 T R A I N E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3 0 0 9 N S A N T A C L A R A R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D F F S T E EVANS RD W E IL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C I N N A B A R C T E N G E L R D M A R I O N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N F M 2 2 5 2 IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D FM 482 F M 7 8 E FM 482 W E IL R D W EIL R D W EIL R D W E I R R D B U N K E R S T F M 2 2 5 2 F M 2 2 5 2 W EIL R D F M 3 0 0 9 F M 7 8 P F A N N S TIE L L N PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N FM 482 H A E C K E R V IL L E R D S T O L T E R D W E T Z R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 3 0 0 9 SCHOENTHAL RD F M 2 2 5 2 B O L T O N R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 4 8 2 E N G E L R D B O L T O N R D FM 2538 FM 78 PFEIL RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D ZUEHL RD E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 3 0 0 9 COYOTE RUN A R IZ P E R D FM 78 F M 2 2 5 2 I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 11 0 3 W E I L R D W E T Z R D F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 A R IZ P E R D F M 4 8 2 T O L L E R D F M 3 0 0 9 M A R I O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 2 5 3 8 I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 2 2 5 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 1 1 0 3 E F M 1 5 1 8 N FIF T H S T E F M 7 8 W F M 4 8 2 F M 4 8 2 F M 7 8 N ABBOTT RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D N A B B O T T R D FM 78 B U N K E R S T F M 3 0 0 9 F M 4 8 2 FM 2538 FM 482 H AE C K ERVILLE R D FM 482 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 7 8 W L O W E R S E G U I N R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D D E A N R D F M 3 0 0 9 FM 78 Legend Municipal_Boundary ETJ Schertz City Limit City_of_Schertz_Zoning_Districts Agricultural District Apartment/Multi-Family Residential Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) Garden Home (Zero Lot Line) General Business General Business II Main Street Mixed Use Manufactured Home Parks Manufactured Home Subdivision Manufacturing (Heavy) Manufacturing (Light) Neighborhood Services Office and Professional Planned Development Pre-Development Public Use Single-Family Residential Single-Family Residential/Agricultural Two-Family Residential Major Thoroughfares Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220804_Schertz_Zoning_Districts.mxd City of Schertz Zoning Map .8/4/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 2 APPENDIX 3 - 30 YEAR POPULATION DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 7 8 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 4 8 2 IH 35 S E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 2 2 5 2 F M 2 5 3 8 I H 1 0 W F M 1 1 0 3 L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 1 0 4 4 G IN R D M A R I O N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N PVT B O L T O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B A T C A V E R D W A L D R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D M IL L E R R D IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D K IT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W EIL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V A L L E Y D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W EI R R D B U N K E R S T S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L R I C H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D F M 4 6 5 M O R N I N G S I D E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D E EVANS RD S T A P P E R R D W I E D E R S T E I N R D B E E C H T R L T O L L E R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D A T H E NIA N W IE D N E R R D S C H M O E K E L R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D T O E P P E R W EIN R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N B I N D S E IL L N R K L N N EVANS RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M B I A M A I N S T W P E RI M E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O L D W IE D E R S T EI N R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R M A R B A C H L N G O L F R D PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S O L D C I M A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N D E D E K E D R D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D G I B B S -S P R A W L R D D I M R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D FIF T H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T A L T O N B L V D K IS E R L N N E W B E R LI N R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M I C H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZA R PK W Y O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VI A TI O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W A T E R L N SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N H I L L S D R T U R N IN G S T O N E H O L L Y L N F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D RIP P L E W A Y GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C I R W E L C O M E D R N O R-T E X D R C I B O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N S S E G U I N R D S T E P H E N S L N R U E C K L E R D H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O L T E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE A G R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S C H U L Z S T HANOVER CV B S T K IL D A R E W IL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y W R I G H T A V E C E D A R C R E E K D R COPPERGATE S C E N I C HIL L L N K U S M I E R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y M A RIG OLD W AY STORM KING R I D G E L I N E R D T RIP L E L L N WILLOW DR B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D C E N T E R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D R E G E N C Y R U N R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N EI D E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTR IDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D N E M E C L N R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V C A F F E Y R D R E D TI P D R R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD H I G H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T A L LI O N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R J O R D A N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M E A D O W D R E K L E I N S T B R E E Z Y C V D A N A D R RIO VISTA DR R O S E L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T R I D T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BEN C H TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G H I L L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LI G H T IV Y L N P E C A N V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A YSPRINGTREE B L F PI G A L L E Y E A G L E D R S T A T E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U N L E S L N J O N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN B L A Z E M O O N R A Y C O R B E T T D R M A Y F AIR H I N G E L O O P E L M S T T R A I L D U S T L N B E N E K E IT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RA MP P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L O M A VIS T A S T KEY WEST WAY U T O P I A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A R I O N R D I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR MEDUSA H O P E L N F M 7 8 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E T Z R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD I H 1 0 W I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E W EIL R D W E T Z R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D N G R A Y T O W N R D I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 7 8 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 4 8 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 2 5 3 8 F M 2 2 5 2 I H 1 0 W F M 1 1 0 3 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G U I N R D G I N R D F M 1 0 4 4 M A R I O N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D PVT B O L T O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B A T C A V E R D M IL L E R R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W EIL R D K IT T Y H A W K R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O V A L L E Y D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W EI R R D B U N K E R S T S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L R I C H R D S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D F M 4 6 5 C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD S T A P P E R R D M O R N I N G S I D E D R W IE D E R S T E I N R D T O L L E R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D A T H E NIA N W IE D N E R R D E EVANS RD S C H M O E K E L R D E P E RI M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD B I N D S EIL L N C O L U M B I A T O E P P E R W EIN R D BEECH TRL M A I N S T W P E RI M E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D W I E D E R S T EI N R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LIE H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O L D CI M A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N M A R B A C H L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D DE D E K E D R FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T K IS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W M I C H E L S O N L N G I B B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A P L E D R LAZA R PK W Y N E W B E R LI N R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A VI A TI O N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N H I L L S D R T U R N IN G S T O N E H O L L Y L N F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C I R N O R-T E X D R C I B O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N S S E G U I N R D S T E P H E N S L N R U E C K L E R D H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O L T E A C R E S C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E A G R D E S C H U L Z S T HANOVER CV B S T K IL D A R E W IL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y W R I G H T A V E C E D A R C R E E K D R COPPERGATE S C E N I C H IL L L N K U S M IE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y M ARIG OLD W AY STORM KING T RIP L E L L N S I E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D C E N T E R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R S C H N EI D E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N OUTR IDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D N E M E C L N R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V C A F F E Y R D R E D TI P D R R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD H I G H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T S T A L LI O N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E T T E L N D R A Y T O N J O R D A N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M E A D O W D R E K L E I N S T B R E E Z Y C V D A N A D R RIO VISTA DR R O S E L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T R I D T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BEN C H TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G H I L L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LI G H T IV Y L N P E C A N W A G O N C R O SSIN G V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A Y S P R I N G T R E E B L F PI G A L L E Y E A G L E D R S T A T E B L V D BRACKEN DR W U N L E S L N J O N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN B L A Z E M O O N R A Y C O R B E T T D R M A Y F AIR H I N G E L O O P E L M S T T R A I L D U S T L N B E N E K E IT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RAMP S T A C K S T O N E P R I C K L Y P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O P I A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A R I O N R D I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR W I N G E D F O O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W EIL R D I H 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W E T Z R D I H 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G S F O R D R D I H 1 0 W F M 7 8 WE FM 1518 N I H 3 5 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R A Y T O W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C K E R VIL L E R D Legend ETJ Population 2020 0 - 300 301 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 7,000 7,001 - 10,000 10,001 - 13,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Population 2050 0 - 300 300 - 1000 1000 - 4000 4000 - 7000 7000 - 10000 10000 - 15000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Population Distribution Schertz 2050 Population Distribution .8/4/2022010,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\20220804_MXD_Files\20220804_Population Projections.mxd Attachment 3 Comal Comal Bexar Guadalupe Bexar Guadalupe APPENDIX 4 - 30 YEAR HOUSING DISTRIBUTION PROJECTIONS IH 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 7 8 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 4 8 2 IH 35 S E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 2 2 5 2 F M 2 5 3 8 I H 1 0 W F M 1 1 0 3 L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 1 0 4 4 G I N R D M A R I O N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N PVT B O L T O N R D L O O K O U T R D N ABBOTT RD S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B A T C A V E R D W A L D R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D M IL L E R R D IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D K IT T Y H A W K R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W E IL R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D CIB O L O V A L L E Y D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W E I R R D B U N K E R S T S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L R I C H R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D F M 4 6 5 M O R N I N G S I D E D R C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D E EVANS RD S T A P P E R R D W I E D E R S T E I N R D B E E C H T R L T O L L E R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D A T H E NIA N W IE D N E R R D S C H M O E K E L R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D T O E P P E R W EIN R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N B I N D S E I L L N R K L N N EVANS RD I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D C O L U M B I A M A I N S T W P E RI M E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E WALZEM RD O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D FREUDENBURG RDWEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R M A R B A C H L N G O L F R D PHOENIX AVE H A L LI E H T S O L D C I M A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N D E D E K E D R D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D G I B B S -S P R A W L R D D I M R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D FIF T H S T W BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T A L T O N B L V D K IS E R L N N E W B E R LI N R D N G R A Y T O W N R D G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T LOOP 337 J S T W M I C H E L S O N L N M A P L E D R LAZA R PK W Y O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A V I A TI O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W A T E R L N SEA WILLOW DR S M A IN S T T U S C A N H I L L S D R T U R N I N G S T O N E H O L L Y L N F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D RIP P L E W A Y GREEN RD R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O PIE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C I R W E L C O M E D R N O R-T E X D R C I B O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N S S E G U I N R D S T E P H E N S L N R U E C K L E R D H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS S T O L T E A C R E S LONE SHADOW TRL WINDBURN TRL C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E SCHMIDT AVE A G R D LONGING TRL MORNING GROVE E S C H U L Z S T HANOVER CV B S T K IL D A R E W IL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y W R I G H T A V E C E D A R C R E E K D R COPPERGATE S C E N I C H IL L L N K U S M IE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y M A RIG OLD W AY STORM KING R I D G E L I N E R D T RIP L E L L N WILLOW DR B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D C E N T E R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D R E G E N C Y R U N R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R C A T T L E M A N S L N S C H N E ID E R L N BORMANN DR A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y V IE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N O U T R ID ER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D N E M E C L N R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V C A F F E Y R D R E D T I P D R R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD H I G H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y S T A L LI O N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R J O R D A N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M E A D O W D R E K L E I N S T B R E E Z Y C V D A N A D R RIO VISTA DR R O S E L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T R I D T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R BEN C H TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G H I L L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LI G H T IV Y L N P E C A N V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A Y S P R I N G T R E E B L F PI G A L L E Y E A G L E D R S T A T E B L V D A S H W O O D R D BRACKEN DR W U N L E S L N J O N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W H O M E S T E A D D R MILLER LN B L A Z E M O O N R A Y C O R B E T T D R M A Y F AIR H I N G E L O O P E L M S T T R A I L D U S T L N B E N E K E IT H W A Y H A R V E S T V W IH 35 N RA M P P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L O M A VIS T A S T KEY WEST WAY U T O P I A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A R I O N R D I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR M ED USA H O P E L N F M 7 8 W WEICHOLD RD E FM 1518 N W E T Z R D IH 35 S PFEIL RD I H 1 0 W IH 3 5 N I H 1 0 E W EIL R D W E T Z R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D N G R A Y T O W N R D I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 7 8 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 4 8 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 2 5 3 8 F M 2 2 5 2 I H 1 0 W F M 1 1 0 3 IH 35 S L O W E R S E G U I N R D G IN R D F M 1 0 4 4 M A R I O N R D FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D C R E E K R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D PVT B O L T O N R D N ABBOTT RD L O O K O U T R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E FM 1976 F M 7 8 W B A T C A V E R D M IL L E R R D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D WARE-SEGUIN RD W A L D R D W E IL R D K IT T Y H A W K R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D PAT BOOKER RD CIB O L O V A L L E Y D R Y O U N G S F O R D R D S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W E I R R D B U N K E R S T S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD U L L R I C H R D S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D F M 4 6 5 C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D SCHOENTHAL RD S T A P P E R R D M O R N I N G S I D E D R W I E D E R S T E I N R D T O L L E R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D A T H E NIA N W IE D N E R R D E EVANS RD S C H M O E K E L R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N R K L N N EVANS RD B I N D S E IL L N C O L U M B I A T O E P P E R W EIN R D BEECH TRL M A I N S T W P E RI M E T E R R D F O R U M R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D W IE D E R S T E I N R D WEICHOLD RD W O O D L A N D O A K S D R G O L F R D FREUDENBURG RD PHOENIX AVE H A L LI E H T S K R U E G E R C A N Y O N O L D C I M A R R O N T R L BIS O N L N M A R B A C H L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K CRESTWAY RD W B Y R D B L V D N S O L M S R D D ED EK E D R FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T K IS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T HIC D R F F S T N G R A Y T O W N R D J S T W M I C H E L S O N L N G I B B S -S P R A W L R D BINZ-ENGLEMAN RD M A P L E D R LAZA R PK W Y N E W B E R LI N R D O M A R D R WALZEM RD H O M E S T E A D P K W Y F A W N D R W BORGFELD RD B E Y E R P A T H W A V I A TI O N B L V D A L T O N B L V D BALBOA DR G A R D E N RID G E D R S W ATER LN SEA WILLOW DR S M AIN S T T U S C A N H I L L S D R T U R N I N G S T O N E H O L L Y L N F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D R O C K E T L N W W E T Z S T O P IE L N A S T E BLUE PT RIVER RD M A I N C I R N O R-T E X D R C I B O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N S S E G U I N R D S T E P H E N S L N R U E C K L E R D H O Y A L N G O L L S T O R T H A V E E B E R T R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FI E L D S VOGES PASS S T O L T E A C R E S C R E E K L O O P R A F B U R N E T T E A G R D E S C H U L Z S T HANOVER CV B S T K IL D A R E W IL D H O R S E P A S S DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y W R I G H T A V E C E D A R C R E E K D R COPPERGATE S C E N I C H IL L L N K U S M IE R Z R D TALKENHORN J O S H S W A Y M A RIG OLD W AY STORM KING T RIP L E L L N S I E N A W O O D S WILLOW DR B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D C E N T E R B R O O K D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R S C H N E ID E R L N P A R K D R A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R L O U A N N D R B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N O U T R IDER C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D N E M E C L N R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V C A F F E Y R D R E D T I P D R R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD H I G H L A N D VIS T A Z U E H L P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R F A R G O E R W A Y U N N A M E D S T S T A L LI O N L N O A K T E R R A C E D R C O L E T T E L N D R A Y T O N J O R D A N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y M E A D O W D R E K L E I N S T B R E E Z Y C V D A N A D R RIO VISTA DR R O S E L N P V T S T A T E N G E L R D E S T R I D T R L N O R T H S T J U S T I C E L N S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y H A R V E S TBELL N O R T H D R B EN C H TRL B R A H M A W A Y C O G H I L L ROYAL DR E A G L E F LI G H T IV Y L N P E C A N W A G O N C R O S SIN G V E R A N O D R S A D D L E H O R N W A Y S P R I N G T R E E B L F PI G A L L E Y E A G L E D R S T A T E B L V D BRACKEN DR W U N L E S L N J O N S W A Y 2 N D A V E W MILLER LN B L A Z E M O O N R A Y C O R B E T T D R M A Y F AIR H I N G E L O O P E L M S T T R A I L D U S T L N B E N E K E IT H W A Y FARMVIEW LN H A R V E S T V W O S A G E A V E IH 35 N RA MP S T A C K S T O N E P R I C K L Y P E A R D R KEY WEST WAY DONSHIRE DR U T O P I A B L V D STANUSH RD F A W N R D G T U S A Y A N O L D M A R I O N R D I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W TALLOW WAY R E D O A K T R L AIRFOIL DR W I N G E D F O O TMEDUSA H O P E L N W E IL R D I H 1 0 E WEICHOLD RD W E T Z R D I H 3 5 N R A M P Y O U N G S F O R D R D I H 1 0 W F M 7 8 WE FM 1518 N I H 3 5 N IH 35 S W E T Z R D N G R A Y T O W N R D PFEIL RD H A E C K E R VIL L E R D Legend ETJ Number of Househo lds 2020 0 - 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexar Comal Guadalupe Legend ETJ Number of Hou seholds 2050 0- 200 201 - 600 601 - 1,000 1,001 - 4,000 4,001 - 6,000 County Boundary Bexa r Comal Guadalupe Schertz 2020 Residential Housing Distribution Schertz 2050 Residential Housing Distribution1/11/2022 .0 10,0005,000 Feet 0 10,0005,000 Feet Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\Working Exhibits\2021.08.19_TM Mxd. Files\20210831_Household Projections_Working.mxd Bexar Comal Guadelupe Bexar Comal Guadelupe APPENDIX 5 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 3 0 0 9 F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 1 1 0 3 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 2 5 3 8 IH 35 S I H 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D M A R I O N R D PVT I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D B O L T O N R D N ABBOTT RD F M 7 8 W C R E E K R D G IN R D M IL L E R R D FM 1976 W A R E - S E G U I N R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N C I B O L O V A L L E Y D R S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W EI R R D B U N K E R S T L O O K O U T R D S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D W I E D E R S T E I N R D S T A P P E R R D PAT BOOKER RD T O L L E R D D E A N R D K IT T Y H A W K R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D B A T C A V E R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D U N I V E R S A L C I T Y B L V D W IE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N S C H M O E K E L R D N EVANS RD C O L U M B I A M A I N S T Y O U N G S F O R D R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D M O R N I N G S I D E D R A E R O A V E SCHOENTHAL RD O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D WEICHOLD RD W O ODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D H A L LIE H T S B IS O N L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FREUDENBURG RD FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T K IS E R L N I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D O L D C I M A R R O N T R L G E R D E S R D G O T H I C D R F F S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B E L R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R F O U R T H S T E W A L D R D L A Z A R P K W Y E A VI A TI O N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P A T H W I N N A V E H S T W P L A N E L N SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AIN S T F O R U M R D W A H L L N T U R N I N G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L L Y L N M A R IL Y N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D N S O L M S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A S T E L O O P 5 3 9 E T H O R N T O N L N R IV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R - T E X D R CIB O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G VI N E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G U I N R D STEPHENS LN S T A TI O N S T A N T L E R D R F S T W BALBOA DR H O Y A L N P E C A N D R PHOENIX AVE S C H M U C K S R D T H I R D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS CORONADO BLVD P A T S Y D R C R E S T W A Y R D H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS W AY C O D Y L N G L O XI N I A D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T T E N E W B E R LI N R D D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1 S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T IH 35 S A C C ESS R D D ST E B Y R D B L V D K IL D A R E DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y T O N K A W A P A S S V A L H A L L A A U T H O R IT Y L N COPPERGATE C A V A N S I L V E R W I N G S C E N IC HIL L L N SCHUETZ DR O L D G R A Y T O W N R D K U S M I E R Z R D WINDSO C K LN F R I E S E N H A H N L N O L D HIG H W AY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y C I R C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T T RIP L E L L N S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R W I N B U R N A V E S C H N EI D E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B R IS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D K I N G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F R IT Z W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N B R U SH TR AIL B EN D R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V U L T R A LI G H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D T I P D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T R IT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R M E A D O W L A R K CATTLE CREEK LN A SIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T E E V A N S R D C O L E T T E L N L O W E R V A L L E Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FI E L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O R G F E L D R D N A C O G D O C H E S L O O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 W T R O Y L N J U S T I C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S R D D O B I E B L V D C I N C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O R IA P T SCENIC D R C Y L A M E N W IL L O W B L F B R A H M A W A Y M I L L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER W OOD DR B L U E B E L L D R M E S A V E R D E W IN K L E R T R L S A D D L E H O R N W A Y K I P P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P R I N G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R P I G A L L E Y E A G L E D R D E N - O T T HIL L A S H W O O D R D BACALL WAY OAK BLOOM B R O O K L I N E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U O IS E T A T E S D R M O U N T O L Y M P U S IVY HORN LIE C K C V M I N E R A L S P G S C I B O L O L N TI M B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T R I P L E C R O W N C O L O N Y S E N N A HIL L S D R R E D IR O N T R A I L D U S T L N GAGE PARK M E S Q U IT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O L D E M O S S P I N G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N FARMVIEW LN C I T A D E L P E A K IH 35 N RA MP T E X A S V A L L E Y M E A D O W L N P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V I S T A B L U E S A G E L N STANUSH RD O Z U N A D R A L A M O P K W Y S I O U X C I R B E T H A N Y W A Y L A S C I M A S D R O A K R D G I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W S I L V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R S I A D R I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C A T T L E R U N L I G U R I A D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D U S K C O L T T R A I L JEANETTE DR GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R Y L LI S H A L LIE L O O P F A W N P A S S R I C H M O N D D R B RITE R D TILDEN TRL I R O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N R I D G E D R M A Y F L O W E R R U S TI C A C R E S P IL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR M C C O Y L N CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y A N D R E W S A V E F R E A D L N S TIL L B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R IDAMARIE LENO WAY P I N S E E K E R L I A N A W I L L O W R U N P A T R I C K H E N R Y MALDEN DR PARRY PATH SAVERNE WAY K A U R I C L I F F S C A N T E R B U R Y H IL L R A W E A V E G L E N C V P O R T R U S H L N H I D D E N K N O L L B A R T E N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P A T H F I N D E R M U S T A N G V A L L E Y K L EIN CI R LUCILLE N E W N I N G J U LI A N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H I R E D R R H E A S T N O T TIN G S HIR E G I N S B E R G D R S A D D L E S P O K E C I B O L O X I N G M E D I A T O R R U N C I B O L O T O L L E R D T I F F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O T H A U D R J E S S E S C I R IH 35 S Y O U N G S F O R D R D I H 1 0 W W E IL R D O A K S T K N E U P P E R R D W E T Z R D N M A I N S T I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E PFEIL RD E FM 1518 N F M 7 8 W S C H A E F E R R D W E T Z R D S P E RI M E T E R R D KUSMIERZ RD H A E C K E R VIL L E R D N G R A Y T O W N R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend SchertzWW_CCN_Boundary Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 5 Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Oakmont Place Carmel Ranch Graytown CrossvineModule III Parklands &Parklands II APPENDIX 6 - PLANNED & EXISTING RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN I H 3 5 N F M 3 0 0 9 F M 7 8 I H 1 0 E F M 4 8 2 F M 1 1 0 3 E F M 1 5 1 8 N W E IL R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 2 2 5 2 IH 35 S F M 2 5 3 8 E LOOP 1604 N I H 1 0 W FM 1516 N G R E E N V A L L E Y R D M A R I O N R D I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E B O L T O N R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 7 8 W W A R E - S E G U I N R D N A B B O T T R D FM 1976 C I B O L O V A L L E Y D R C R E E K R D G IN R D S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W EI R R D B U N K E R S T S A V A N N A H D R L O O K O U T R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D A R IZ P E R D W I E D E R S T EI N R D T O L L E R D M IL L E R R D PAT BOOKER RD D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D PVT H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D W I E D N E R R D K IT T Y H A W K R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D U N I V E R S A L C I T Y B L V D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N B A T C A V E R D N E V A N S R D R O N R D C O L U M B I A M A I N S T W P E R I M E T E R R D S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D SCHOENTHAL RD A E R O A V E S C H M O E K E L R D O L D W I E D E R S T EI N R D WEICHOLD RD W O O DLAND O AKS DR G O L F R D S T A P P E R R D H A L LIE H T S Y O U N G S F O R D R D B IS O N L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D W A L D R D FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T M O R N I N G S I D E D R N M A I N S T K IS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T H I C D R F F S T L A U R A H T S IH 35 S A C C ESS R D J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B E L R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R S S A N T A C L A R A R D F O U R T H S T E L A Z A R P K W Y E A VI A TI O N B L V D O L D C I M A R R O N T R L O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D N S O L M S R D B E Y E R P A T H W A V I A TI O N B L V D W I N N A V E H S T W I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D P L A N E L N SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AI N S T W A H L L N T U R N I N G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L L Y L N M A R IL Y N D R F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A S T E L O O P 5 3 9 E FREUDENBURG RD T H O R N T O N L N R IV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R - T E X D R C IB O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G U I N R D STEPHENS LN S T A TI O N S T A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N P E C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T H I R D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS H S T E H O L M A N R D C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS W AY C O D Y L N G L O XI N I A D R VAGABOND LN R A F B U R N E T T E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1 S T S T E F O R U M R D HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B L V D K IL D A R E BALBOA DR DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y V A L H A L L A CRESTW AY RD A U T H O RIT Y L N COPPERGATE C A V A N S I L V E R W I N G S C E N IC HIL L L N SCHUETZ DR WINDSOCK LN F R I E S E N H A H N L N O LD HIG H W AY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y C I R C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T T RIP L E L L N S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R W I N B U R N A V E S C H N EI D E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B R IS C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R T O N K A W A P A S S W S C H A E F E R R D K I N G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F R IT Z W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W B R US H TR AIL BEN D R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V U L T R A LI G H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D TI P D R ATHENIAN H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T R IT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN A SIA G O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A L L E Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O R G F E L D R D N A C O G D O C H E S L O O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 W T R O Y L N J U S T I C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S R D D O B I E B L V D C I N C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O R IA P T SCENIC D R C Y L A M E N W IL L O W B L F B R A H M A W A Y M I L L S T DAVIE LN S IL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B E L L D R M E S A V E R D E W IN K L E R T R L S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P R I N G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R E E V A N S R D P I G A L L E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R D E N- O T T HIL L A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K L I N E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U O I S E T A T E S D R M O UNT OLYM PUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V M I N E R A L S P G S CORDOBA DR C I B O L O L N TI M B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T R I P L E C R O W N C O L O N Y R E D IR O N E L M S T T R A I L D U S T L N GAGE PARK M E S Q U IT E W O O D S B E N E K E IT H W A Y O L D E M O S S P I N G W A Y HIC K O R Y B E N D C I T A D E L P E A K IH 35 N RAMP T E X A S V A L L E Y M E A D O W L N P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V I S T A B L U E S A G E L N O Z U N A D R A L A M O P K W Y S I O U X C I R B E T H A N Y W A Y L A S C I M A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S I L V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R P E R S I A D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C A T T L E R U N L I G U R I A D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D U S K A U T U M N H O L W C O L T T R A I L GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K W I N D I N G T R L A M A R Y L LIS H A L LIE L O O P F A W N P A S S R I C H M O N D D R B RITE R D TILDEN TRL I R O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W S U N R I D G E D R M A Y F L O W E R R U S TI C A C R E S P IL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B R I C K E L L R D RHODE DR M C C O Y L N CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y F R E A D L N R O B E R T S T E V E N S A IL E R O N D R S TIL L B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R P L A N T E R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY P I N S E E K E R L I A N A W I L L O W R U N T A P W O O D L N SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U R I C L I F F S C A N T E R B U R Y H IL L R A W E A V E G LE N C V P O R T R U S H L N H I D D E N K N O L L B A R T E N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P A T H F I N D E R M U S T A N G V A L L E Y K L EIN C IR MISTY MEADOW N E W N I N G J U LI A N P T G A N D E R PA R K LI N C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H I R E D R R H E A S T P O S E I D O N N O T TIN G S HIR E A U T U M N A R B O R G I N S B E R G D R S A D D L E S P O K E C I B O L O X I N G M E D I A T O R R U N C I B O L O T O L L E R D T I F F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N BARK W OOD Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O T H A U D R A L A B A S T E R E L G I N P A R K J E S S E S C I R M E A D O W V W A S T W I H 1 0 E K N E U P P E R R D W E T Z R D IH 35 N R A M P N M A I N S T F M 7 8 W E FM 1518 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E F E R R D I H 3 5 N S P E RI M E T E R R D O A K S T PFEIL RD W E T Z R D H A E C K E R V IL L E R D IH 35 S I H 1 0 W N G R A Y T O W N R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D Schertz Planned and Existing Residential DevelopmentsComparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Legend Schertz_Water_CCN_Service_Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Multi-Family Residential Development Planned and Existing Residential Subdivisions Maximum Housing Units 0 - 5 6 - 25 26 - 75 76 - 100 101 - 200 201 - 300 301 - 400 401 - 1050 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Residential_WaterCCN.mxd . Parklands &Parklands II Saddlebrook Sterling Grove Carmel Ranch Attachment 6 Oakmont Place CrossvineModule III Graytown APPENDIX 7 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WASTEWATER CCN I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E F M 3 0 0 9 F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 1 1 0 3 W EIL R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 2 5 3 8 G R E E N V A L L E Y R D IH 35 S F M 2 2 5 2 I H 1 0 W FM 1516 N M A R I O N R D PVT G I N R D B O L T O N R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E F M 7 8 W C R E E K R D N A B B O T T R D I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D W A R E - S E G U I N R D M IL L E R R D FM 1976 C IB O L O V A L L E Y D R S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W E I R R D B U N K E R S T E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N S A V A N N A H D R R O N R D C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D L O O K O U T R D S C H W A B R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D W E T Z R D S S A N T A C L A R A R D A R IZ P E R D W I E D E R S T E I N R D S T A P P E R R D T O L L E R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D W IE D N E R R D PAT BOOKER RD N GRAYTOWN RD S C H M O E K E L R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T K IT T Y H A W K R D D O E R R L N N EVANS RD U L L R IC H R D M O R N I N G S I D E D R C O L U M B I A M A I N S T SCHOENTHAL RD S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D WEICHOLD RD W O O DLAND O AKS DR B A T C A V E R D G O L F R D H A L LIE H T S I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D W A L D R D B IS O N L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T FREUDENBURG RD N M A I N S T K IS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T H I C D R F F S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B E L R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R F O U R T H S T E N S O L M S R D L A Z A R P K W Y E A VI A TI O N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P A T H W AVIATION BLVD W I N N A V E H S T W P L A N E L N SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AI N S T W A H L L N T U R N I N G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L L Y L N M A R IL Y N D R H O L M A N R D F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D R O C K E T L N O P IE L N A S T E L O O P 5 3 9 E T H O R N T O N L N RIV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R - T E X D R CIB O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G U I N R D STEPHENS LN S T A TI O N S T A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N P E C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D T H I R D S T W T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS N PERIMETER RD H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS W AY C O D Y L N G L O X I N I A D R VAG A B OND LN R A F B U R N E T T E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y 1 S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B L V D K IL D A R E W W E T Z S T DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y V A L H A L L A A U T H O RIT Y L N IH 35 S A C C ESS R D COPPERGATE C A V A N S I L V E R W I N G O A K S I D E S C E NI C H IL L L N SCHUETZ DR K U S M I E R Z R D WI NDS OCK L N F R IE S E N H A H N L N O L D HIG H W AY 81 J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y C I R C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T T RIP L E L L N S PERIMETER RD CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D D O E P P E N S C H M I D T R D PARKVIEW DR N E W B E R LI N R D H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R W I N B U R N A V E PHOENIX AVE S C H N EI D E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B R I S C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D K I N G S W A Y B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F R IT Z W A Y OLD G R AYT O W N R D K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N B R U SH TR AIL B EN D R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V U L T R A LI G H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D TI P D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T R IT O N P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN A SIA G O AUTUMN RUN LN U N N A M E D S T C O L E T T E L N L O W E R V A L L E Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O R G F E L D R D N A C O G D O C H E S L O O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D S E I D E L S T L O O P 5 3 9 W T R O Y L N J U S T I C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S R D D O B I E B L V D C I N C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VI C T O R I A P T SCENIC D R C Y L A M E N W IL L O W B L F B R A H M A W A Y M I L L S T DAVIE LN SIL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N B L U E B E L L D R M E S A V E R D E W IN K L E R T R L S A D D L E H O R N W A Y K I P P E R A V E WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P R I N G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R PI G A L L E Y E A G L E D R D E N - O T T HIL L A S H W O O D R D W U N L E S L N OAK BLOOM B R O O K L I N E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U O IS E T A T E S D R IVY HORN LIE C K C V M I N E R A L S P G S C I B O L O L N TI M B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T R I P L E C R O W N C O L O N Y R E D IR O N T R A I L D U S T L N GAGE PARK M E S Q U IT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y O L D E M O S S P I N G W A Y PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N C I T A D E L P E A K IH 35 N RA MP T E X A S V A L L E Y M E A D O W L N E E V A N S R D TITAN P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V I S T A B L U E S A G E L N O Z U N A D R A L A M O P K W Y S I O U X C I R B E T H A N Y W A Y O A K R D G C A R R A N Z A L N I H 1 0 W R A M P B R O O K V W S I L V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R S I A D R I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C A T T L E R U N L I G U R I A D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D U S K D E M ETE R S U N S E T C V C O L T T R A I L JEANETTE DR GULF ST L A H M A V E T U M B L E B R O O K A M A R Y L LIS H A L LIE L O O P F A W N P A S S SCARLET CRK R I C H M O N D D R B RITE R D TILDEN TRL I R O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W H O U S T O N D R S U N R I D G E D R M A Y F L O W E R R U S TI C A C R E S P IL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K RHODE DR M C C O Y LN CONNELL POND ROSALINA LOOP H O P E L N K A Y L A L N A N D R E W S A V E F R E A D L N S TIL L B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R IDAMARIE T R A N Q U I L L N LENO WAY P I N S E E K E R L I A N A W I L L O W R U N P A T R I C K H E N R Y MALDEN DR SAVERNE WAY K A U R I C L I F F S C A N T E R B U R Y H IL L R A W E A V E G LE N C V P O R T R U S H L N H I D D E N K N O L L B A R T E N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P A T H F I N D E R M U S T A N G V A L L E Y K L EI N CIR LUCILLE N E W N I N G J U LI A N P T C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H I R E D R R H E A S T P O S E I D O N N O T TIN G S HIR E G I N S B E R G D R S A D D L E S P O K E C I B O L O X I N G M E D I A T O R R U N C I B O L O T O L L E R D T I F F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL I V Y D O V E R O T H A U D R J E S S E S C I R N M A I N S T E FM 1518 N Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 7 8 W I H 1 0 W IH 35 S O A K S T S P E RI M E T E R R D W E IL R D W E T Z R D I H 3 5 N I H 1 0 E PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D W E T Z R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D WEICHOLD RD Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Wastewater CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Wastewater CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Commercial Parcels Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcels Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-SewerCCN.mxd . Attachment 7 APPENDIX 8 - PLANNED & EXISTING COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS COMPARISON TO WATER CCN I H 3 5 N F M 3 0 0 9 I H 1 0 E F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 1 1 0 3 W E IL R D F M 2 2 5 2 L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 2 5 3 8 IH 35 S E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N FM 1516 N I H 1 0 W G R E E N V A L L E Y R D I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D M A R I O N R D S C H E R T Z P K W Y F M 7 8 E FM 1976 N A B B O T T R D B O L T O N R D W A R E - S E G U I N R D F M 7 8 W C IB O L O V A L L E Y D R S T O L T E R D E N G E L R D W EI R R D B U N K E R S T L O O K O U T R D PVT G IN R D S A V A N N A H D R C O U N T R Y L N Z U E H L R D PFEIL RD S C H A E F E R R D S C H W A B R D M IL L E R R D C O Y O T E R U N FIF T H S T E N S A N T A C L A R A R D A R IZ P E R D C R E E K R D W I E D E R S T E I N R D W E T Z R D PAT BOOKER RD T O L L E R D K IT T Y H A W K R D D E A N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N BOENIG DR B A T C A V E R D T R A I N E R H A L E R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D M A S K E R D U N I V E R S A L C I T Y B L V D W IE D N E R R D N GRAYTOWN RD E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D F M 7 8 E A S T D O E R R L N N E V A N S R D C O L U M B I A S T A P P E R R D M A I N S T S A S S M A N R D LIV E O A K R D A E R O A V E I H 3 5 S A C C E S S R D O L D W I E D E R S T EI N R D WEICHOLD RD W O ODLAND OAKS DR G O L F R D SCHOENTHAL RD S C H M O E K E L R D H A L LIE H T S B IS O N L N D IE T Z R D W E S T O N R D E C K H A R D T R D D I M R O C K C U R TIS S A V E W B Y R D B L V D Y O U N G S F O R D R D FIF T H S T W N O R T H B L V D O A K S T N M A I N S T O L D CI M A R R O N T R L R O N R D K IS E R L N G E R D E S R D G O T H IC D R F F S T L A U R A H T S J S T W SCENIC LAKE DR E L B E L R D GREAVES LN M A P L E D R F O U R T H S T E M O R N I N G S I D E D R L A Z A R P K W Y E A VI A TI O N B L V D O M A R D R H O M E S T E A D P K W Y I K E L N F A W N D R W B O R G F E L D R D B E Y E R P A T H W A V I A TI O N B L V D W I N N A V E F O R U M R D H S T W P L A N E L N SEA WILLOW DR C O Y L N S M AI N S T W A H L L N S S A N T A C L A R A R D T U R N I N G S T O N E N SEGUIN RD H O L L Y L N M A R IL Y N D R F S T E D E E R C R E E K B LV D I H 1 0 W A C C E S S R D R O C K E T L N O PIE L N A S T E L O O P 5 3 9 E T H O R N T O N L N R IV E R R D MAIN CIR N O R - T E X D R CIB O L O T R L H O L L E R I N G V I N E R U S C H L N C S T E S S E G U I N R D STEPHENS LN P AT S Y D R BALBOA DR S T A TI O N S T PHOENIX AVE A N T L E R D R F S T W H O Y A L N P E C A N D R S C H M U C K S R D CORONADO BLVD T H I R D S T W C R E S T W A Y R D T O W N C R E E K R D D U S T Y FIE L D S VOGES PASS M E A D O W L A R K H S T E C H E R R Y T R E E D R PARKLANDS W AY C O D Y L N G L O XI N I A D R VAGABO ND LN R A F B U R N E T T E D W L N B E L M O N T P K W Y K R U E G E R C A N Y O N 1 S T S T E HANOVER CV B S T D ST E B Y R D B L V D K IL D A R E DONALAN DR T R I- C O U N T Y P K W Y T O N K A W A P A S S V A L H A L L A A U T H O R IT Y L N COPPERGATE C A V A N S I L V E R W I N G S C E N IC HIL L L N WI NDS O CK L N F R I E S E N H A H N L N J O S H S W A Y M A R I G O L D W A Y C I R C L E O A K D R S T O R M K I N G 1 S T S T T RIP L E L L N S PERIMETER RD WILLOW DR CYPRESS PT B L A ZIN G S T A R T R L A B B E Y R D PARKVIEW DR H U B E R T U S R D R E G E N C Y R U N MARIETTA LN R I O L N C O R P O R A T E D R W I N B U R N A V E S C H N E I D E R L N W IL L O W V W F R O B O E S E L N B R I S C O R D A S H L E Y P A R K V A L L E Y VIE W D R W S C H A E F E R R D K I N G S W A Y J S T E B R O W A R D A V E M O R G A N R U N C A N O P Y B E N D S H O R T W E Y E L R D B E C K S T P E C O S P T F R IT Z W A Y IRONMILL CRK K N E U P P E R R D N E M E C L N F O U R T H S T W B R U SH TR AIL B EN D R E A L R O C K R D C O V E R S C V U L T R A LI G H T R D C A F F E Y R D R E D TI P D R H A R V E S T B E N D R U S TI C W IL L O W LIBERTY RD I S T E L O T U S P A R K T R IT O NE E V A N S R D P O S E Y P A S S G U A D A C O M A D R CATTLE CREEK LN A SIA G O U N N A M E D S T L O W E R V A L L E Y L N D R A Y T O N H A E C K E R FIE L D S V E R D E P K W Y L O S T M E A D O W S D R HINGE PATH B O R G F E L D R D N A C O G D O C H E S L O O P C R E S T O A K D R ROSE LN P V T S T A T E N G E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 W T R O Y L N J U S T I C E L N E A G L E V A L L E Y S T S U M A C L N J A S O N S W A Y F O U R O A K S L N S S O L M S R D D O B I E B L V D C I N C H O N A T R L B E L L N O R T H D R VIC T O RIA P T SCENIC DR C Y L A M E N W IL L O W B L F B R A H M A W A Y M I L L S T DAVIE LN S IL O S T ROYAL DR IV Y L N WATER W OOD DR B L U E B E L L D R M E S A V E R D E W IN K L E R T R L S A D D L E H O R N W A Y WOMAN HOLLERING RD IVY JADE S P R I N G T R E E B L F S A F A R I D R P I G A L L E Y B A T C A V E L O O P E A G L E D R D E N- O T T HIL L A S H W O O D R D OAK BLOOM B R O O K L I N E MILLER LN COPPER CV H A N A L N A N T H E M L N R A Y C O R B E T T D R T U R Q U O IS E T A T E S D R M O UNT OLY M PUS ANN DR IVY HORN LIE C K C V M I N E R A L S P G S C I B O L O L N TI M B E R S P G S J O N A S D R T R I P L E C R O W N C O L O N Y S E N N A HIL L S D R R E D IR O N E L M S T GAGE PARK M E S Q U IT E W O O D S B E N E K EIT H W A Y A V E N U E B O L D E M O S S P I N G W A Y HIC K O R Y B E N D PVT RD AT 5890 FM 1516 N C I T A D E L P E A K IH 35 N RAMP T E X A S V A L L E Y M E A D O W L N P R I C K L Y P E A R D R L U C K S I D E SHERRI DR C O V E T R L K O V E L N G R A N D V I S T A GAMBELS QUAIL B L U E S A G E L NOZUNA D R A L A M O P K W Y S I O U X C I R B E T H A N Y W A Y L A S C I M A S D R O A K R D G B R O O K V W S I L V E R B U C K L E M A X F LI D R S T O N E B R O O K D R SAHARA WOODS P E R SI A D R T E A K W O O D L N I S T W R E D O A K T R L A R R O Y O V E R D E C A T T L E R U N L I G U R I A D R L O O K O V E R B A Y S H A D O W Y D U S K A U T U M N H O L W C O L T T R A I L GULF ST T U M B L E B R O O K W I N D I N G T R L A M A R Y L LIS H A L LIE L O O P F A W N P A S S R I C H M O N D D R B RITE R D I R O L A D R H A L LIE VIE W S U N R I D G E D R M A Y F L O W E R R U S TI C A C R E S P IL O T P T L A N D M A R K O A K B R I C K E L L R D RHODE DR M C C O Y LN CONNELL POND H O P E L N K A Y L A L N C O LIN A W A Y F R E A D L N R O B E R T S T E V E N S A IL E R O N D R S TIL L B R O O K L N P E V E R O P A R K V A L L E Y D R P L A N T E R S P A S S IDAMARIE LENO WAY P I N S E E K E R L I A N A W I L L O W R U N PARRY PATH T A P W O O D L N SAVERNE WAY ORO VIEJO CT K A U R I C L I F F S C A N T E R B U R Y H IL L R A W E A V E G LE N C V P O R T R U S H L N H I D D E N K N O L L B A R T E N H EIM D R RUSTIC TRL P A T H F I N D E R M U S T A N G V A L L E Y K L EIN C IR N E W N I N G J U LI A N P T SENECA CRK LI N C O L N D R C A N D Y L N G R E E N S H I R E D R R H E A S T N O T TIN G S HIR E A U T U M N A R B O R TORONTO DR G I N S B E R G D R S A D D L E S P O K E C I B O L O XI N G B R I A R K N O L L M E D I A T O R R U N C I B O L O T O L L E R D T I F F A N Y L N SHAY PASS T H U R B E R D R A B E R C O R N Q U A K E R R D G H E A V E N L Y V W GAGE CONNELL IV Y D O V E R O T H A U D R A L A B A S T E R E L G I N P A R K J E S S E S C I R A S T W W E T Z R D F M 7 8 W W E T Z R D I H 1 0 E N M A I N S T I H 3 5 N K N E U P P E R R D S C H A E F E R R D O A K S T Y O U N G S F O R D R D S P E RI M E T E R R D E FM 1518 N PFEIL RD H A E C K E R V IL L E R D I H 1 0 W IH 35 S Schertz Planned and Existing Commericial Developments Comparison to Water CCN Service Area 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/16/2022 Legend Schertz Water CCN Service Area Schertz City Limit ETJ Planned and Existing Commercial Properties Commercial Parcel Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220531_Commercial-WaterCCN.mxd . Attachment 8 APPENDIX 9 - WASTEWATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 4 8 2 C R E E K R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E R I M E T E R R D G E R D E S R D G O L F R D W E S T O N R D S T O L T E R D F M 7 8 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P A T H F M 7 8 O PIE L N E L B E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 E N O R - T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN A P G L N BOENIG DR B U N K E R S T D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D O L D G R AYT O W N R D H O L M A N R D T RIP L E L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EI D E R L N F R O B O E S E L N F M 7 8 E A S T V O G ES P A SS O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D PFANNSTIEL LN C A F F E Y R D F M 2 2 5 2 DAVIE LN F M 2 5 3 8 RETAMA PKWY W E I R R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R C A L E D R M IL L E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D S C H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A L L E Y R D P I P E S T O N E G I N R D T O L L E R D ARIZPE RD B O L T O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D K R IE W A L D L N Y O U N G S F O R D R D B A T C A V E R D W A R E - S E G U I N R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N FIF T H S T E SHAY PASS F M 7 8 W MID A S E F M 1 5 1 8 N W IE D N E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D K IS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E T Z R D T R A I N E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3 0 0 9 N S A N T A C L A R A R D F F S T E EVANS RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D K R U E G E R C A N Y O N S A F A R I D R C I N N A B A R C T E N G E L R D M A R I O N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N E F M 1 5 1 8 N B U N K E R S T E LOOP 1604 N F M 2 5 3 8 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 7 8 F M 2 2 5 2 B O L T O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D W E T Z R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N B U N K E R S T N ABBOTT RD F M 7 8 E F M 2 2 5 2 FM 2538 F M 2 2 5 2 F M 1 1 0 3 IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D FM 2538 A R IZ P E R D M A R I O N R D P F A N N S TIE L L N FM 78 F M 7 8 W S T O L T E R D F M 7 8 F M 4 8 2 W E IL R D F M 3 0 0 9 L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 4 8 2 W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 4 8 2 F M 3 0 0 9 FM 78 W A L D R D F M 4 8 2 W E IL R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 1 1 0 3 E F M 1 5 1 8 N I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 F M 3 0 0 9 F M 3 0 0 9 H A EC K ER VILLE R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 7 8 E PFEIL RD B O L T O N R D FM 482 F M 4 8 2 N A B B O T T R D F M 3 0 0 9 W E I R R D F M 4 8 2 W E T Z R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D FM 78 FM 482 D E A N R D FM 482 ZUEHL RD F M 7 8 W FM 78 W E I L R D FM 2538 FIF T H S T E E N G E L R D SCHOENTHAL RD I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 7 8 FM 482 F M 3 0 0 9 W EIL R D A R IZ P E R D T O L L E R D Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 3 0 0 9 I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D Legend ETJ Schertz City Limit Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Schertz Sewer CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Sewer Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Sewer CCN Map.mxd 8/8/2022 0 10,0005,000 Feet Attachment 9 APPENDIX 10 - WATER CCN SERVICE AREA & COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PVT F M 4 8 2 C R E E K R D E P E R I M E T E R R D K O E H L E R R D W P E R I M E T E R R D G E R D E S R D G O L F R D W E S T O N R D S T O L T E R D F M 7 8 E ZUEHL RD B E Y E R P A T H F M 7 8 O PIE L N E L B E L R D L O O P 5 3 9 E N O R -T E X D R C O Y O T E R U N STEPHENS LN BOENIG DR RETAMA PKWY B U N K E R S T D E A N R D N A B B O T T R D R A F B U R N E T T E T RIP L E L L N S T A P P E R R D S C H N EI D E R L N F R O B O E S E L N F M 7 8 E A S T O L D N A C O G D O C H E S R D PFANNSTIEL LN C A F F E Y R D F M 2 2 5 2 DAVIE LN W EI R R D S C H W A B R DABBEY RD D O E R R L N F A W N D R F M 2 5 3 8 C A L E D R M IL L E R R D LAKE VIEW DR D O L L Y D R M A S K E R D L O O K O U T R D S C H M O E K E L R D O M A R D R FM 1103 G R E E N V A L L E Y R D P I P E S T O N E G IN R D T O L L E R D ARIZPE RD B O L T O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D K R IE W A L D L N S M AIN S T Y O U N G S F O R D R D W A R E- S E G U I N R D E L O O P 1 6 0 4 N FIF T H S T E SHAY PASS F M 7 8 W MID A S E F M 1 5 1 8 N W I E D N E R R D IH 35 N A C C E S S R D K IS E R L N FM 1516 N W A L D R D H A E C K E R VIL L E R D W E T Z R D T R A I N E R H A L E R D C O D Y L N PFEIL RD F M 3 0 0 9 N S A N T A C L A R A R D F F S T W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D S A F A R I D RCINNABAR C T E N G E L R D M A R I O N R D SCHOENTHAL RD C O U N T R Y L N T O L L E R D P F A N N S TIE L L N W E T Z R D S T O L T E R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N FM 78 F M 4 8 2 Y O U N G S F O R D R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 4 8 2 W E IL R D E F M 1 5 1 8 N L O W E R S E G U I N R D E LOOP 1604 N F M 4 8 2 E FM 1518 N SCHOENTHAL RD FM 78 A R IZ P E R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D N ABBOTT RD W EIL R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482FM 482 W E I R R D F M 3 0 0 9 F M 2 2 5 2 F M 2 2 5 2 I H 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 1 1 0 3 B O L T O N R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D FM 482 E F M 1 5 1 8 N B U N K E R S T W E T Z R D PFEIL RD H A E C K ERVILLE R D F M 4 8 2 W E I L R D FM 78 H A E C K E R V IL L E R D ZUEHL RD F M 1 1 0 3 FM 2538 A R IZ P E R D F M 3 0 0 9 W EIL R D F M 7 8 W F M 2 2 5 2 N A B B O T T R D B U N K E R S T M A R I O N R D FIF T H S T E F M 4 8 2 F M 7 8 F M 3 0 0 9 D E A N R D I H 1 0 E A C C E S S R D F M 2 2 5 2 F M 3 0 0 9 FM 2538 F M 7 8 E IH 3 5 N A C C E S S R D F M 7 8 E F M 7 8 W W EIL R D B O L T O N R D L O W E R S E G U I N R D F M 4 8 2 F M 7 8 FM 2538 F M 3 0 0 9 FM 482 E N G E L R D F M 3 0 0 9 FM 482 F M 2 5 3 8 E F M 1 5 1 8 N F M 3 0 0 9 F M 2 2 5 2 PFEIL RD FM 78 Legend ETJ Schertz City Limit Schertz Water CCN Service Area Schertz Water CCN Service Area Future Land Use Agricultural Conservation Air Installation Civic, Schools Commercial Industrial Mixed Use Multi-Family Residential Parks, Open Space Single Family Residential Transition SchertzCCN Water Service Area MapSupported Land Uses . Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\Land Use Assumptions\20220527 Exhibits\20220527_Schertz Water CCN Map.mxd 0 10,0005,000 Feet 8/8/2022 Attachment 10 APPENDIX 11 - NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP NEAR TERM WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 12 - 2030 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 13 - 2030 WATER CIP MAP 2030 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 14 - 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS 2050 FIRE FLOW ANALYSIS LOCATIONS APPENDIX 15 - 2050 WATER CIP MAP 2050 WATER CIP MAP APPENDIX 16 - FLOW METER, METER BASIN, & RAIN GAUGE LOCATION MAP ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ÔÕ ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_^_ ^_^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ ^_ FM01 FM04 FM02 FM03 FM12 FM14FM06 FM05FM13 FM08 FM09 FM07 FM15 FM10 FM11 RG01 RG02 RG06 RG05 RG04 RG03 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_1_RainGauge_FlowMeterBasins.mxd Attachment 1 Flow Meter, Meter Basin, and Rain Gauge Location 8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend ^_Flow Meter ÔÕ Rain Gauge ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Gravity Main CCMA Schertz Flow Meter Basins BasinID FM01 FM02 FM03 FM04 FM05 FM06 FM07 FM08 FM09 FM10 FM11 FM12 FM13 FM14 FM15 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 17 - DRY WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 18 - WET WEATHER CALIBRATION GRAPHS APPENDIX 19 - EXISTING SYSTEM EVALUATION RESULTS, SURCHARGE, & SSO LOCATION MAPS ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ")")") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 21Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4 4.A 4.B 4.C 4.D 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ! Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 0.550.275 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.A Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 0.20.1 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.B Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.C Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 0.30.15 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.D Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 ") Document Path: N:\120\120-11816-012\9-0-Data-GIS-Modeling\9-01-GIS\7-Working\WW\Attachment_2-A_Surcharge_and_SSO.mxd Existing System Evaluation Results - Surcharge and SSO Locations 8/22/2022 . 0 0.10.05 Miles Legend SSO ")LiftStations !Outfalls Force Main Hydraulic Condition Not Surcharged Surcharged Attachment 4.E Surcharged lines highlighted in GREEN are owned by the City 8/26/2022 APPENDIX 20 - NEAR TERM WASTEWATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS NEAR TERM WASTE WATER GROWTH & SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 21 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 22 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Lege nd #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main SARA's System Lines Sewer C CN Boundary City L imits / E TJ Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2030 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 23 - SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Lege nd SSO #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer C CN Boundary City L imits / E TJ Gravity Line Gravity Line 2030 New Growth CIP SARA's System Lines SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS /0 1.5 30.75 Miles SANITARY SEWER OVERFLOWS (SSO) WITH 2030 WET WEATHER FLOWS APPENDIX 24 - 2030 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2030 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 25 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS 2050 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM GROWTH PROJECTS APPENDIX 26 - MAX DEPTH TO DIAMETER WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOWS Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö Ö # # # # # ## # # # # Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NR Can, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China(Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS UserCommunity Lege nd #Outfall Ö Lift Station Force Main Sewer C CN Boundary City L imits / E TJ SARA's System Lines Max (d/D) 0 - 0.25 0.25 - 0.50 0.50 - 0.75 0.75 - 1.00 MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW /0 1.5 30.75 Miles MAX DEPTH-TO-DIAMETER (d/D) WITH 2050 DRY WEATHER FLOW APPENDIX 27 - 2050 WASTEWATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 2050 WASTE WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS APPENDIX 28 - INFLATION RATE CALCULATION SOURCES Year San Antonio Index Difference 2024 249.7 -4.7 2023 254.4 21 2022 233.4 33.9 2021 199.5 4 2020 195.5 11 2019 184.5 3.5 2018 181 5.5 2017 175.5 2.4 2016 173.1 1.3 2015 171.8 2.3 2014 169.5 5.2 2013 164.3 3.6 2012 160.7 8.1 2011 152.6 4.7 2010 147.9 26.6 2005 121.3 21.9 2000 99.4 1.4 1999 98 3.2 1998 94.8 1.4 1997 93.4 4.5 1995 88.9 8.2 1990 80.7 6.8 1985 73.9 18.9 1980 55 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2024 128%6.31% 2010 to 2024 169%3.81% 2000 to 2024 251%3.91% 1990 to 2024 309%3.38% 1980 to 2024 454%3.50% RSMeans Historical Inflation Indexes Year National Index Difference 2023 Q4 182.5 0.1 2023 Q3 182.4 0.4 2023 Q2 182 2.3 2023 Q1 179.7 1.1 2022 178.6 11.2 2021 167.4 29.6 2020 137.8 2.8 2019 135 4.2 2018 130.8 8.5 2017 122.3 4.8 2016 117.5 3.6 2015 113.9 3 2014 110.9 3.6 2013 107.3 3.7 2012 103.6 2.6 2011 101 4.6 2010 96.4 2.6 2009 93.8 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 132%9.65% 2010 to 2023 188%5.93% Mortenson Historical Inflation Indexes (Base 2009) Year Average Index Difference 2023 1373 78 2022 1295 96 2021 1199 22 2020 1177 21 2019 1156 60 2018 1096 58 2017 1038 49 2016 989 46 2015 943 41 2014 902 38 2013 864 34 2012 830 18 2011 812 13 2010 799 -33 2009 832 -76 2008 908 54 2007 854 61 2006 793 76 2005 717 62 2004 655 34 2003 621 2 2002 619 6 2001 613 18 2000 595 25 1999 570 21 1998 549 24 2010-1996 rates are stored online and can be provided if desired 1997 525 20 1996 505 - Time Frame Total Inflation Rate Yearly Inflation Rate 2020 to 2023 117%5.27% 2010 to 2023 172%4.25% 2000 to 2023 231%3.70% 1996 to 2024 272%3.77% Turner Historical Inflation Indexes APPENDIX 29 - CIP PROJECTS COST ESTIMATES Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-W1**Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement $763,000 27%$206,715 NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $8,600,000 0%$0 NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement $175,000 0%$0 NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin $1,538,000 0%$0 NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab $455,556 0%$0 NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt $1,600,000 0%$0 NT-W7**Graytown to Pfeil $1,550,000 69%$1,077,040 NT-W8**FM 78 Water Line Replacement $875,000 22%$194,778 NT-W9**Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement $3,000,000 0%$0 NT-W10**Robinhood Way WL Replacement $4,650,000 0%$0 $23,206,556 -$1,478,532 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive $4,788,000 100%$4,788,000 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements $1,438,000 89%$1,272,934 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd $3,688,000 97%$3,569,245 2030-W4**Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $9,850,000 93%$9,192,317 2030-W5**Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement $6,388,000 69%$4,411,757 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main $32,075,000 100%$32,075,000 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 $5,213,000 33%$1,737,667 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements $6,063,000 100%$6,063,000 $69,503,000 -$63,109,920 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane $413,000.0 0%$0 2030-W10**River Rd 6" WL Replacement $2,325,000 58%$1,354,926 $2,738,000 -$1,354,926 $72,241,000 -$64,464,846 2050-W1 Corbett Pump Station Expansion $1,663,000 2050-W2 FM 2252 8" WL Improvements $8,800,000 2050-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 $2,725,000 2050-W4 Beck St 6" WL Replacement $5,288,000 2050-W5 Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements $4,438,000 2050-W6 IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST $42,188,000 2050-W7 IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements $3,075,000 $68,177,000 2050-W8 Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement $4,775,000 $4,775,000 $72,952,000 $168,399,556 $65,943,379 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. System Improvement Projects System Improvement Projects 2050 Growth Subtotal: Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2050 CIP Projects are not included in this impact fee total. 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WATER CIP TOTAL: 2030 TOTAL: 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name Total Project Cost 2020-2030 Growth Utilization Impact Fee Eligible Portion NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 $6,875,000 21%$1,440,972 NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 $2,925,000 0%$0 NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24"$10,425,000 23%$2,378,763 NT-S4**Upsize Lookout Line $3,838,000 20%$771,788 NT-S5**Upsize Tri County Line $2,084,800 25%$526,887 NT-S6 Cibolo West Main $16,213,000 83%$13,523,463 NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main $3,400,000 74%$2,517,091 $45,760,800 -$21,158,965 NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station $88,000 0%$0 NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station $1,500,000 0%$0 NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP $175,000 0%$0 $1,763,000 -$0 $47,523,800 -$21,158,965 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line $2,025,000 67%$1,359,153 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8"$1,338,000 5%$68,849 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 $2,563,000 10%$249,210 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 $400,000 12%$47,722 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8"$1,663,000 83%$1,372,188 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 $4,913,000 33%$1,613,509 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 $1,938,000 100%$1,938,000 2030-S8 Aranda 8"$475,000 100%$475,000 2030-S9 Weir Road 10"$2,525,000 100%$2,522,465 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10"$1,038,000 100%$1,034,756 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8"$3,113,000 97%$3,012,264 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"$400,000 40%$160,000 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 $2,713,000 99%$2,677,145 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"$2,963,000 29%$849,531 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8"$1,275,000 52%$661,379 $29,342,000 -$18,041,171 2030 SI-1**Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize $8,175,000 22%$1,833,143 2030 SI-2**Fairlawn WW Upsize $1,375,000 9%$121,579 2030 SI-3**Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize $1,288,000 4%$46,406 2030 SI-4**Woodland Oak Drive Replacements $338,000 4%$13,741 2030 SI-5**Old Wiederstein WW Upsize $5,050,000 61%$3,099,614 2030 SI-6**Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade $7,838,000 5%$392,686 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station $463,000 0%$0 $24,527,000 -$5,507,169 $53,869,000 -$23,548,341 2050-S1 I-35 N 8"$9,088,000 2050-S2 Friesenhahn Lane 8"$6,500,000 2050-S3 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 $5,713,000 2050-S4 Corbett JH 8"$2,888,000 2050-S5 Lower Seguin Road 8"$1,338,000 2050-S6 I-10 8" - Section 2 $3,338,000 $28,865,000 2050 SI-1 Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade $1,463,000 2050 SI-2 Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station $238,000 2050 SI-3 Decommission Park Lift Station $3,663,000 2050 SI-4 Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station $238,000 $5,602,000 $34,467,000 $135,859,800 $44,707,306 ** - Indicates that there are both growth & system improvement components to the project. Near Term CIP Growth Projects System Improvement Projects 2030 TOTAL: 2050 Growth Subtotal: 2050 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: NEAR TERM TOTAL: Near Term Growth Subtotal: Near Term System Improvement Projects Subtotal: 2050 TOTAL: WASTE WATER CIP TOTAL: System Improvement Projects 2050 CIP projects are not eligible to be included in the impact fee total. Proposed 2050 CIP Growth Projects 2030 Growth Subtotal: 2030 System Improvement Projects Subtotal: City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Waste Water CIP Estimate of Probable Cost Summary System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update CCMA System Improvement Projects - Estimate of Probable Cost Summary Project Number Project Name Project Cost 2030 C-1 Roy Richard Drive Replacements $1,588,000 2030 C-2 Valencia Lane Replacements $2,288,000 2030 C-3 Savannah Drive Replacements $12,425,000 2030 C-4 Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line $12,950,000 $29,251,000CCMA System Improvement Projects Total: CCMA System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP NEAR TERM WATER CIP PROJECTS Justification: 1 LF 1,320 135$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 7,000$ 21,000$ 3 EA 3 8,500$ 26,000$ 4 EA 27 2,100$ $56,700 4 LF 660 196$ 130,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 446,000$ $23,000 $134,000 $610,000 $153,000 $763,000 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION System Improvement ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Service & System Connections SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W1** Project Category:Water CIP Type: Project Location: City identified CIP.Replace leaking 6" from River Rd to just south of Cibolo Creek along Bubbling Springs with 12", approximately 1,320 LF. Project Description: UNIT COST TOTAL PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control 1 LS 1 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ 8,600,000$ Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station (2,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST. Per “Corbett 3.0 MG GST Project” Preliminary Engineering Report (2021), construction is currently underway. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 2,000 gpm Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024 Project Number:NT-W2 1 LS 1 100,000$ 100,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Controls ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:System Improvement TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W3 Project Description: Justification: Control improvements at Ware Seguin Pump Station to be per GST level rather than a timer. Potentially zero cost project to improve pump station performance in this service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY 1 LF 5,150 135$ $696,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 907,000$ $46,000 $273,000 $1,230,000 $308,000 $1,538,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W4 Project Location: Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Justification: Approximately 5,150 LF of 12" from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin in open field. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL $455,555.79 Justification: Approximately 2,270 LF of 12" from Fred Couples to Schwab. Total cost shown is portion paid for by the City. Currently under construction. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Fred Couples to Schwab Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LF 5,400 135$ $729,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 *LS 1 16,000$ $16,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 941,000$ $48,000 $283,000 $1,280,000 $320,000 $1,600,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 5,400 LF of 12" from Schwab to Eckhardt. Currently in design. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schwab to Eckhardt Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 5,200 135$ $702,000 2 EA 11 7,000$ $77,000 3 EA 11 8,500$ $93,500 4 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 5 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 913,000$ $46,000 $274,000 $1,240,000 $310,000 $1,550,000 TOTAL Currently in design. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Approximately 5,200 LF of 12" along IH-10 from N. Graytown Rd to Pfeil Rd. Project Description: ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Graytown to Pfeil Project Number:NT-W7** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 2,300 135$ $310,500 2 EA 5 7,000$ $35,000 3 EA 5 8,500$ $42,500 4 EA 46 2,100$ $96,600 5 LS 1 8,000$ $8,000 6 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 518,000$ $26,000 $156,000 $700,000 $175,000 $875,000 Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Fire Hydrant Traffic Control Service & System Connections 12" Water Line Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Project Category:Water CIP Type:System Improvement Phase: Near Term ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) CONTINGENCY (30%) Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8"/10" to 12" along FM 78 from east of Bubbling Springs Rd to end of dead-end line, approximately 2,300 LF. SWPPP Project Number:NT-W8** MOBILIZATION (5%) Project Name:FM 78 Water Line Replacement Justification: 1 LF 4,970 85$ $423,000 2 EA 10 7,000$ $70,000 3 EA 10 8,500$ $85,000 4 EA 100 2,100$ $210,000 5 LF 4,970 190$ $945,000 6 LS 1 15,000$ $15,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 1,773,000$ $89,000 $532,000 $2,400,000 $600,000 $3,000,000 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 4" to 8" along Moonlight Meadow Dr and Lost Meadows Dr north of Schaefer Rd, approximately 4,970 LF. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name: Project Number:NT-W9** Project Category:Water Justification: 1 LF 6,670 135$ $901,000 2 EA 14 7,000$ $98,000 3 EA 14 8,500$ $119,000 4 EA 134 2,100$ $281,400 5 LF 6,670 196$ $1,307,320 6 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 7 LS 1 25,000$ $25,000 $2,751,000 $138,000 $826,000 $3,720,000 $930,000 $4,650,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Needed for fire flow. Project Description: Upsize existing 8" to 12" along Robin Hood Way, approximately 6,670 LF. Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Robinhood Way WL Replacement Project Number:NT-W10** Project Category:Water 2030 WATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,060 170$ $1,030,200 2 EA 13 8,900$ $115,700 3 EA 13 10,700$ $139,100 4 LF 6,060 247$ $1,496,000 5 LS 1 22,000$ $22,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,835,000 $142,000 $851,000 $3,830,000 $958,000 $4,788,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 12" loop east of FM 3009, north of IH-35 (approximately 6,060 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W1 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 1,750 170$ $297,500 2 EA 4 8,900$ $35,600 3 EA 4 10,700$ $42,800 4 LF 1,750 247$ $432,000 5 LS 1 7,000$ $7,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $847,000 $43,000 $255,000 $1,150,000 $288,000 $1,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 1,750 LF of 12" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 5,590 110$ $614,900 2 EA 12 3,800$ $45,600 3 EA 12 10,700$ $128,400 4 LF 5,590 239$ $1,337,000 5 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 6 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $2,178,000 $109,000 $654,000 $2,950,000 $738,000 $3,688,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: New 8" loop north of Lower Seguin Rd, east of Ray Corbett Dr (approximately 5,590 LF). Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W3 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 2,960 170$ $503,200 2 LF 9,650 110$ $1,061,500 3 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 4 EA 20 3,800$ $76,000 5 EA 26 10,700$ $278,200 6 EA 253 2,650$ $670,450 7 LF 12,610 247$ $3,112,000 8 LS 1 46,000$ $46,000 9 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $5,833,000 $292,000 $1,750,000 $7,880,000 $1,970,000 $9,850,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Water Line 8" Water Line 12" Gate Valve Service & System Connections Traffic Control Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W4** Project Category:Water CIP Type:Growth Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to supply new service area. Project Description: Upsize approximately 2,960 LF of 2" to 12" along Trainer Hale Rd east of FM 1518; and 9,650 LF of new 8" loop north of Trainer Hale Rd, east of FM 1518. Project Location: Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement 8" Gate Valve ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Justification: 1 LF 8,600 110$ $946,000 2 EA 18 3,800$ $68,400 3 EA 18 10,700$ $192,600 4 EA 172 2,650$ $455,800 5 LF 8,600 239$ $2,057,000 6 LS 1 31,000$ $31,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $3,783,000 $190,000 $1,135,000 $5,110,000 $1,278,000 $6,388,000 Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL Needed to meet growth in area and provide fire flow. Project Description: Upsize approximately 5,300 LF of 6" to 8" along Boenig Dr south of N Graytown Rd, and 3,300 LF new 8" along future Binz-Engleman Rd. Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION CIP Type:Growth 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name: Project Number:2030-W5** Project Category:Water 1 LF 20,000 570$ $11,400,000 2 EA 40 25,700$ $1,028,000 3 EA 40 10,700$ $428,000 4 EA 16 17,700$ $283,200 5 EA 16 23,200$ $371,200 6 LF 20,000 269$ $5,388,000 7 LS 1 72,000$ $72,000 8 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $19,003,000 $951,000 $5,701,000 $25,660,000 $6,415,000 $32,075,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Project Description: Justification: Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission line (approximately 20,000 LF). In progress, pending easement acquisition. Needed to meet growth and provide redundancy. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control ARV (1") CAV (3") Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main Date: August 2024 Project Number:2030-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 24" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LS 1 2,518,000$ $2,518,000 2 EA 2 189,000$ $378,000 3 EA 1 126,000$ $126,000 4 LS 1 63,000$ $63,000 $3,085,000 $155,000 $926,000 $4,170,000 $1,043,000 $5,213,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W7 Project Location: Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth 1,000 GPM GW Well 1,000 GPM Pump for PS VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 1 - Expand Ware Seguin to firm pumping capacity of 1,000 gpm, 105 TDH; and new groundwater well to provide supply to Ware Seguin. Needed to meet new growth in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. 1 LF 4,300 230$ $991,000 2 EA 9 8,200$ $73,800 3 EA 9 23,100$ $207,900 4 LF 4,300 515$ $2,215,000 5 LS 1 34,000$ $34,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,590,000 $180,000 $1,077,000 $4,850,000 $1,213,000 $6,063,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 4,300 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and Scenic Lake Dr. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 70,000$ $140,000 2 EA 1 80,000$ $80,000 3 LS 1 19,000$ $19,000 $239,000 $12,000 $72,000 $330,000 $83,000 $413,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" PRV Connection/Operations Expenses Justification: 3 new PRVs (2-6", 1-8") to create new pressure zone in southwest part of system. Avoids high pressures and improves performance of Ware Seguin Pump Station. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W9 Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Description: 6" PRV 1 LF 2,590 170$ $440,300 2 EA 6 8,900$ $53,400 3 EA 6 10,700$ $64,200 4 EA 52 2,650$ $137,800 5 LF 2,590 247$ $639,000 6 LS 1 10,000$ $10,000 7 LS 1 32,000$ $32,000 $1,377,000 $69,000 $414,000 $1,860,000 $465,000 $2,325,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,590 LF of ex. 6" to 12" along River Rd from FM 78 to Bubbling Springs Rd to remove bottleneck. Removes system bottleneck. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:River Rd 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-W10** Project Category:Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement 12" Water Line Gate Valve 2050 WATER CIP PROJECTS  1 EA 1 543,000$     $543,000 2 EA 1 272,000$     $272,000 3 LS 1 163,000$     $163,000 $978,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Description: Justification: Corbett Pump Station Expansion - Expand Corbett to 4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures throughout southern part of system. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 2,000 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett Pump Station Expansion Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W1 1 LF 6,290 230$ $1,450,000 2 EA 13 8,200$ $106,600 3 EA 13 23,100$ $300,300 4 LF 6,290 515$ $3,240,000 5 LS 1 49,000$ $49,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $5,214,000 $261,000 $1,565,000 $7,040,000 $1,760,000 $8,800,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Approximately 6,290 LF of 8" along FM 2252 and new loop. Supplies new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 2252 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W2 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 2 461,000$ $922,000 2 EA 2 272,000$ $544,000 3 LS 1 147,000$ $147,000 $1,613,000 $81,000 $484,000 $2,180,000 $545,000 $2,725,000 Project Description: Justification: Ware Seguin Pump Station Improvements Phase 2 - Expand Ware Seguin to 1,200 gpm, 123 TDH firm capacity. Prevents low pressures in Ware Seguin area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 1,200 GPM Pump VFD Yard Piping & Other Appurtenances Project Category:Water Phase: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W3 1 LF 3,270 230$ $754,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 EA 66 5,700$ $376,200 5 LF 3,270 515$ $1,685,000 6 LS 1 26,000$ $26,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $3,129,000 $157,000 $939,000 $4,230,000 $1,058,000 $5,288,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 1,590 LF of 6" to 8" along Beck St east of Schertz Pkwy, 1,680 LF of new 8". Upgrades distribution system to current min. pipe size (8") to serve new service area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Beck St 6" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W4 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement 8" Water Line Gate Valve 1 LF 3,100 230$ $715,000 2 EA 7 8,200$ $57,400 3 EA 7 23,100$ $161,700 4 LF 3,100 515$ $1,597,000 5 LS 1 24,000$ $24,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,624,000 $132,000 $788,000 $3,550,000 $888,000 $4,438,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 3,100 LF of new 8" along Raf Burnette east of Authority Ln. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Raf Burnette Rd 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W5 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 EA 1 14,232,000$ $14,232,000 2 LS 1 3,031,000$ $3,031,000 3 LS 1 922,000$ $922,000 4 LS 1 85,000$ $85,000 5 LS 1 6,723,000$ $6,723,000 $24,993,000 $1,250,000 $7,498,000 $33,750,000 $8,438,000 $42,188,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Foundation for GST Connect to 24" Main Pump Station Project Description: Justification: IH-35 Pump Station (4,000 gpm, 183 TDH firm capacity) and 3.0 MG GST, new connection from SSLGC transmission main to the Live Oak to IH-35 24" transmission main. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-35 Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W6 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth 3.0 MG GST Yard Piping & Pumps for GST 1 LF 2,110 230$ $487,000 2 EA 5 8,200$ $41,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 LF 2,110 515$ $1,087,000 5 LS 1 17,000$ $17,000 6 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $1,816,000 $91,000 $545,000 $2,460,000 $615,000 $3,075,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Water Line Gate Valve Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: 2,110 LF of new 8" along IH-10 and FM 1518. Needed to meet growth in area. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:IH-10 & FM 1518 8" WL Improvements Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W7 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth SWPPP Project Description: 1 LF 2,500 366$ $915,000 2 EA 5 19,000$ $95,000 3 EA 5 23,100$ $115,500 4 EA 50 5,700$ $285,000 5 LF 2,500 531$ $1,329,000 6 LS 1 20,000$ $20,000 7 LS 1 68,000$ $68,000 $2,828,000 $142,000 $849,000 $3,820,000 $955,000 $4,775,000 SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Upsize 2,500 LF of 8" to 12" along Lower Seguin Rd.Needed for fire flow. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Fire Hydrant Surface Replacement Traffic Control Service & System Connections Project Description: Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Rd 8" WL Replacement Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-W8 Project Category:Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Capacity 12" Water Line Gate Valve NEAR TERM WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,600 360$ 2,376,000$ 2 EA 14 17,000$ 238,000$ 3 LF 6,600 214$ 1,413,000$ 4 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 4,071,000$ $204,000 $1,222,000 $5,500,000 $1,375,000 $6,875,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 1) with approximately 6,600 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 4,470 130$ 582,000$ 2 EA 9 17,000$ 153,000$ 3 LF 4,470 214$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 1,730,000$ $87,000 $519,000 $2,340,000 $585,000 $2,925,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase IV (section 2) with approximately 4,470 LF of 12-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: 1 LF 10,060 360$ 3,622,000$ 2 EA 20 17,000$ 343,000$ 3 LF 10,060 214$ 2,153,000$ 4 LS 1 29,000$ 29,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 6,172,000$ $309,000 $1,852,000 $8,340,000 $2,085,000 $10,425,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 24" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Town Creek Phase V with approximately 10,060 LF of 24-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Town Creek Phase V 24"Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S3 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Project Description: Justification: Justification: 1 LF 3,910 200$ 782,000$ 2 EA 8 17,000$ 133,000$ 3 LF 3,128 100$ 313,000$ 4 LS 1 203,000$ 203,000$ 5 LF 3,910 205$ 802,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 2,270,000$ $114,000 $681,000 $3,070,000 $768,000 $3,838,000 Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Lateral Lines Operational Expenses SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) TOTAL Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:Growth Project Location: Project Description: Lookout Line (8") upsized to 18-inch gravity line (~ 3,910 LF). Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Name:Upsize Lookout Line Project Number:NT-S4** Waste Water Growth Justification: 1 LF 3,910 234$ 916,000$ 2 LS 1 1,168,800$ 1,168,800$ $2,084,800 UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. Project Description: Tri County Line upsized from 8-inch gravity line to 18-inch gravity line (~ 1,760 LF). Note: Costs provided by City. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Remaining Costs Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Phase: Near Term Project Category: CIP Type: Project Name:Upsize Tri County Line Project Number:NT-S5** 1 LF 21,680 200$ 4,336,000$ 2 EA 43 17,000$ 738,000$ 3 LF 21,680 205$ 4,445,000$ 4 LS 1 62,000$ 62,000$ 5 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 9,606,000$ $481,000 $2,882,000 $12,970,000 $3,243,000 $16,213,000 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Project Description: Project Location: SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Justification: Cibolo West Main with approximately 21,680 LF of 18-inch gravity line. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cibolo West Main Date: August 2024Project Number:NT-S6 $9,600,000 $13,000,000 $3,400,000 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main Date: August 2024 Project Number:NT-S7 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL ELIGIBLE* PROJECT COST Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,940 LF of 18-inch gravity line serving Hallie’s Cove. Approximately 12,550 LF of 30-inch gravity line, approximately 5,990 LF of 14-inch force main, and WHC lift station. CostS provided by the City. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. *Only the cost increase between 2011 & 2024 is eligible to be included in the impact fee total. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST (2011) ACTUAL CONSTRUCTION COST (2024) 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 50,000$ $3,000 $15,000 $70,000 $18,000 $88,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Justification: Tri County LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Tri County Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-1 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal Decommission Lift Station Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LF 2,410 105$ 254,000$ 3 EA 5 17,000$ 85,000$ 4 LF 2,410 193$ 466,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 25,000$ 25,000$ 888,000$ $45,000 $267,000 $1,200,000 $300,000 $1,500,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Justification: Corbett LS to go offline. Approximately 2,410 LF of 10-inch gravity line installed to connect to existing system. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Location: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Corbett Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-2 Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station Removal SWPPP Project Description: 1 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 2 LS 1 50,000$ 50,000$ 100,000$ $5,000 $30,000 $140,000 $35,000 $175,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Decommission WWTP Project Description: Justification: Sedona LS to go offline and Woman Hollering Creek (WHC) WWTP decommissioned. Part of the lift station elimination plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: Near TermCIP Type:Lift Station & WWTP Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP Date: August 2024Project Number:NT SI-3 2030 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 2,950 107$ 316,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,950 239$ 706,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,194,000 $60,000 $359,000 $1,620,000 $405,000 $2,025,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,950 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of Old Wiederstein Rd and along Hope Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S1 1 LF 1,900 107$ 204,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,900 239$ 455,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $785,000 $40,000 $236,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,900 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Old Wiederstein Rd from Dean Rd to vicinity of Kaylee Chase. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Old Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S2 1 LF 3,750 107$ 402,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 3,750 239$ 897,000$ 4 LS 1 14,000$ 14,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,517,000 $76,000 $456,000 $2,050,000 $513,000 $2,563,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,750 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S3 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line south of Union Pacific Rail Road. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S4 1 LF 2,400 107$ 257,000$ 2 EA 5 21,400$ 107,000$ 3 LF 2,400 239$ 574,000$ 4 LS 1 9,000$ 9,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $979,000 $49,000 $294,000 $1,330,000 $333,000 $1,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,400 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Wiederstein Rd between Jupe and Quail Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Wiederstein Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S5 1 LF 7,300 107$ 782,000$ 2 EA 15 21,400$ 321,000$ 3 LF 7,300 239$ 1,746,000$ 4 LS 1 27,000$ 27,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $2,908,000 $146,000 $873,000 $3,930,000 $983,000 $4,913,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 7,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Schaefer Rd , Lisa Meadows and Voges pass. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S6 1 LF 2,800 107$ 300,000$ 2 EA 6 21,400$ 129,000$ 3 LF 2,800 239$ 670,000$ 4 LS 1 11,000$ 11,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,142,000 $58,000 $343,000 $1,550,000 $388,000 $1,938,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Schaefer Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S7 1 LF 550 107$ 59,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 43,000$ 3 LF 550 239$ 132,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $274,000 $14,000 $83,000 $380,000 $95,000 $475,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Aranda, north of Chalk Stem. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Aranda 8"Date: August 2024 Project Number:2030-S8 1 LF 3,500 132$ 463,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 150,000$ 3 LF 3,500 239$ 838,000$ 4 LS 1 13,000$ 13,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,496,000 $75,000 $449,000 $2,020,000 $505,000 $2,525,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,500 LF of 10-inch gravity line west of Weir Rd and north of Trainer Hale Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Weir Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S9 1 LF 1,350 132$ 179,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 65,000$ 3 LF 1,350 239$ 323,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $607,000 $31,000 $183,000 $830,000 $208,000 $1,038,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,350 LF of 10-inch gravity line along Trainer Hale Rd, east of E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Trainer Hale Road 10"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S10 1 LF 4,550 107$ 487,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 214,000$ 3 LF 4,550 239$ 1,089,000$ 4 LS 1 17,000$ 17,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,839,000 $92,000 $552,000 $2,490,000 $623,000 $3,113,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,550 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Ware Seguin Rd west of FM 1518. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Ware Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S11 1 LF 500 107$ 54,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 3 LF 500 239$ 120,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $236,000 $12,000 $71,000 $320,000 $80,000 $400,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 500 LF of 8-inch gravity line along E FM 1518 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:FM 1518 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S12 1 LF 4,000 107$ 428,000$ 2 EA 8 21,400$ 172,000$ 3 LF 4,000 239$ 957,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,604,000 $81,000 $482,000 $2,170,000 $543,000 $2,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,000 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 1 Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S13 1 LF 4,350 107$ 466,000$ 2 EA 9 21,400$ 193,000$ 3 LF 4,350 239$ 1,041,000$ 4 LS 1 16,000$ 16,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $1,748,000 $88,000 $525,000 $2,370,000 $593,000 $2,963,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,350 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Boenig Dr and Ware Seguin Rd going north. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Boenig Drive 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S14 1 LF 1,800 107$ 193,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 86,000$ 3 LF 1,800 239$ 431,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ $750,000 $38,000 $225,000 $1,020,000 $255,000 $1,275,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,800 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of I-10 E and along N Greytown Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:N Greytown Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2030-S15 Justification: 1 LF 6,500 252$ 1,637,000$ 2 EA 13 21,400$ 279,000$ 3 LF 5,200 126$ 655,000$ 4 LS 1 535,000$ 535,000$ 5 LF 6,500 258$ 1,678,000$ 6 LS 1 24,000$ 24,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 4,840,000$ $242,000 $1,452,000 $6,540,000 $1,635,000 $8,175,000ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) UNIT COST TOTAL 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Traffic Control ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY Operational Expenses Surface Replacement System Improvement To resolve 4 SSOs upstream of Friesenhahn LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~4,900 LF), parallel to Friesenhahn Ln and an existing 12-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,600 LF) immediately upstream of the Friesenhahn LS. Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost 2030 SI-1** Project Category:Waste Water Project Location: Date: August 2024 Phase: 2030 Project Name:Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize Project Number: CIP Type: Justification: 1 LF 1,320 132$ 175,000$ 2 EA 3 21,400$ 57,000$ 3 LF 1,056 126$ 133,000$ 4 LS 1 87,000$ 87,000$ 5 LF 1,320 243$ 321,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 813,000$ $41,000 $244,000 $1,100,000 $275,000 $1,375,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 10" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Fairlawn WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-2** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO upstream of Riata LS. Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 10-inch gravity line (~1,320 LF) along Fairlawn Ave from Ashwood Rd to Riata LS. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 1,150 164$ 189,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 50,000$ 3 LF 920 126$ 116,000$ 4 LS 1 81,000$ 81,000$ 5 LF 1,150 247$ 284,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 760,000$ $38,000 $228,000 $1,030,000 $258,000 $1,288,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-3** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To resolve an SSO near I 35 N. Project Description: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~1,150 LF), south of I-35 N and east of Hampton Inn & Suites of Schertz. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST Justification: 1 LF 250 164$ 41,000$ 2 EA 1 21,400$ 11,000$ 3 LF 200 126$ 26,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LF 250 247$ 62,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 198,000$ $10,000 $60,000 $270,000 $68,000 $338,000 Traffic Control 12" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Woodland Oak Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-4** Project Location: Project Description: Replacing an existing 8-inch with 12-inch gravity line (~250 LF), near Woodland Oak Dr. To resolve an SSO near Woodland Oak Dr. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP Justification: 1 LF 3,330 378$ 1,258,000$ 2 EA 7 21,400$ 143,000$ 3 LF 2,664 126$ 336,000$ 4 LS 1 330,000$ 330,000$ 5 LF 3,330 263$ 877,000$ 6 LS 1 12,000$ 12,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 2,988,000$ $150,000 $897,000 $4,040,000 $1,010,000 $5,050,000 PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 21" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Date: August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Old Wiederstein WW Upsize Project Number:2030 SI-5** Project Location: Phase: 2030 To increase line capacity. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Description: Replacing an existing 18-inch with 21-inch gravity line (~3,330 LF), along Old Wiederstein Rd. ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST 1 LS 1 4,637,000$ 4,637,000$ $4,637,000 $232,000 $1,392,000 $6,270,000 $1,568,000 $7,838,000 Project Location: TOTAL ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (2,750 gpm) ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST Date: Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost August 2024 Project Category:Waste Water CIP Type:System Improvement Project Name:Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade Project Number:2030 SI-6** 2030Phase: Northcliffe LS upgrade to firm capacity of 4,500 gpm. Project Description: Justification: To follow TCEQ requirement of peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 4,485 gpm. 1 LS 1 63,000$ 63,000$ 2 LF 420 107$ 45,000$ 3 EA 1 21,400$ 22,000$ 4 LF 420 239$ 101,000$ 5 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 6 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 271,000$ $14,000 $82,000 $370,000 $93,000 $463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Belmont Park LS to go offline; install approximately 420 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along Livingston Dr. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 SI-7 1 LF 1,220 252$ 308,000$ 2 EA 2 21,400$ 53,000$ 3 LF 976 126$ 123,000$ 4 LS 1 101,000$ 101,000$ 5 LF 1,220 258$ 315,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 940,000$ $47,000 $282,000 $1,270,000 $318,000 $1,588,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 15-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,220 LF), east of Roy Richard Dr and south of Woodland Oaks Dr. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Roy Richard Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-1 1 LF 1,780 252$ 449,000$ 2 EA 4 21,400$ 77,000$ 3 LF 1,424 126$ 180,000$ 4 LS 1 147,000$ 147,000$ 5 LF 1,780 258$ 460,000$ 6 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 1,353,000$ $68,000 $406,000 $1,830,000 $458,000 $2,288,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 18" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 10-inch with 18-inch gravity line (~1,780 LF), north of Woodland Oaks Dr and east of Valencia Ln. To resolve 2 SSOs near Woodland Oak Dr and Valencia Ln. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Valencia Lane Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-2 1 LF 5,230 806$ 4,214,000$ 2 EA 10 21,400$ 224,000$ 3 LF 4,184 126$ 527,000$ 4 LS 1 818,000$ 818,000$ 5 LF 5,230 292$ 1,528,000$ 6 LS 1 19,000$ 19,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,362,000$ $369,000 $2,209,000 $9,940,000 $2,485,000 $12,425,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,230 LF), south of Savannah Dr and north of Live Oak Rd. To resolve an SSO near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Savannah Drive Replacements Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-3 1 LF 5,450 806$ 4,391,000$ 2 EA 11 21,400$ 234,000$ 3 LF 4,360 126$ 549,000$ 4 LS 1 852,000$ 852,000$ 5 LF 5,450 292$ 1,592,000$ 6 LS 1 20,000$ 20,000$ 7 LS 1 32,000$ 32,000$ 7,670,000$ $384,000 $2,301,000 $10,360,000 $2,590,000 $12,950,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SWPPP SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Traffic Control 36" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Lateral Lines Operational Expenses Surface Replacement Project Description: Justification: Replacing an existing 30-inch with 36-inch gravity line (~5,450 LF), near Community Cir, from Buffalo Dr to Live Oak Rd. To resolve 2 SSOs near Maske Rd. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2030CIP Type:CCMA System Capacity Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Build Out Project 25 - 36" Schertz Line Date: August 2024Project Number:2030 C-4 2050 WASTEWATER CIP PROJECTS 1 LF 6,250 230$ 1,441,000$ 2 EA 13 46,100$ 600,000$ 3 LF 6,250 515$ 3,220,000$ 4 LS 1 49,000$ 49,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 5,378,000$ $269,000 $1,614,000 $7,270,000 $1,818,000 $9,088,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 6,250 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and along I-35 N. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name: I-35 N 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S1 1 LF 4,460 230$ 1,028,000$ 2 EA 9 46,100$ 415,000$ 3 LF 4,460 515$ 2,298,000$ 4 LS 1 35,000$ 35,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,844,000$ $193,000 $1,154,000 $5,200,000 $1,300,000 $6,500,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 4,460 LF of 8-inch gravity line, along Friesenhahn Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Friesenhahn Lane 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S2 1 LF 3,910 230$ 901,000$ 2 EA 8 46,100$ 369,000$ 3 LF 3,910 515$ 2,014,000$ 4 LS 1 31,000$ 31,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 3,383,000$ $170,000 $1,015,000 $4,570,000 $1,143,000 $5,713,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 3,910 LF of 8-inch gravity line from Schaefer Rd north parallel to Authority Ln. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Schaefer Road 8" - Section 3 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S3 1 LF 1,930 230$ 445,000$ 2 EA 4 46,100$ 185,000$ 3 LF 1,930 515$ 995,000$ 4 LS 1 15,000$ 15,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,708,000$ $86,000 $513,000 $2,310,000 $578,000 $2,888,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 1,930 LF of 8-inch gravity line, south of Corbett Junior High School and north of Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Corbett JH 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S4 1 LF 830 230$ 192,000$ 2 EA 2 46,100$ 93,000$ 3 LF 830 515$ 428,000$ 4 LS 1 8,000$ 8,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 789,000$ $40,000 $237,000 $1,070,000 $268,000 $1,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 830 LF of 8-inch gravity line along Lower Seguin Rd. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Lower Seguin Road 8"Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S5 1 LF 2,220 230$ 512,000$ 2 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 3 LF 2,220 515$ 1,144,000$ 4 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 5 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 1,973,000$ $99,000 $592,000 $2,670,000 $668,000 $3,338,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Approximately 2,220 LF of 8-inch gravity line north of and parallel to IH-10. Anticipated growth based on Land Use Plan. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Growth Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:I-10 8" - Section 2 Date: August 2024Project Number:2050-S6 1 LS 1 865,000$ 865,000$ 865,000$ $44,000 $260,000 $1,170,000 $293,000 $1,463,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Upgrade Lift Station (~250 gpm) Project Description: Justification: Cypress Point LS upgrade to firm capacity of 1,250 gpm. To follow TCEQ requirement of Peak flow not to exceed firm capacity. This upgrade is based on buildout flow of 1,233 gpm. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:System Improvement Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Cypress Point Lift Station Upgrade Date: August 2024 Project Number:2050 SI-1 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Schertz Pkwy LS to go offline. To convey flow to a new CCMA's line which will be built by 2050. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Schertz Parkway Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-2 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 2 LF 2,300 230$ 530,000$ 3 EA 5 46,100$ 231,000$ 4 LF 2,300 515$ 1,185,000$ 5 LS 1 18,000$ 18,000$ 6 LS 1 68,000$ 68,000$ 2,168,000$ $109,000 $651,000 $2,930,000 $733,000 $3,663,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) SWPPP Project Description: Justification: Park LS to go offline; install approximately 2,300 LF of 8-inch gravity line to connect to the line along E Aviation Blvd. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Decommission Lift Station 8" Gravity Line Standard Manhole (60" DIA.) Surface Replacement Traffic Control Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Park Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-3 1 LS 1 136,000$ 136,000$ 136,000$ $7,000 $41,000 $190,000 $48,000 $238,000 Project Location: ESTIMATE TOTAL PROJECT COST SUBTOTAL MOBILIZATION (5%) CONTINGENCY (30%) TOTAL CONSTRUCTION PS&E & CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT (25%) Decommission Lift Station Project Description: Justification: Cover’s Cove LS to go offline. Per City request. ITEM NO. ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT ESTIMATED QUANTITY UNIT COST TOTAL Project Category:Waste Water Phase: 2050CIP Type:Lift Station Removal Capital Improvement Plan Estimate of Probable Cost Project Name:Decommission Cover's Cove Lift Station Date: August 2024Project Number:2050 SI-4 APPENDIX 30 - CIP PROJECTS UTILIZATION CALCULATIONS Project Number Project Name Existing Peak Flow (gpm) 2030 Peak Flow (gpm) 2050 Peak Flow (gpm) 2020-2030 % Utilization NT-W1**Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement 185.86 269.83 309.94 27% NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station & 3.0 MG GST N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W3 Ware Seguin Pump Station Operational Improvement N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt N/A N/A N/A N/A NT-W7**Graytown to Pfeil - 32.61 46.93 69% NT-W8**FM 78 Water Line Replacement 369.10 500.30 589.39 22% NT-W9**Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow Dr WL Replacement 18.83 18.83 18.83 0% NT-W10**Robinhood Way WL Replacement 46.06 46.06 46.06 0% 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension to Cibolo Valley Drive - 316.47 229.95 100% 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Improvements - 177.06 200.02 89% 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett Dr to Lower Seguin Rd - 594.20 613.97 97% 2030-W4**Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement - 530.42 568.37 93% 2030-W5**Boenig Dr S 6" WL Replacement & 8" WL Improvement 2.43 117.51 166.63 69% 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Transmission Main - 5,346.49 4,000.00 100% 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion Phase 1 600.00 1,000.00 1,200.00 33% 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Improvements - 15.11 11.35 100% 2030-W9 PRV Installation for Proposed Southwest Pressure Plane N/A N/A N/A N/A 2030-W10**River Rd 6" WL Replacement 115.65 311.01 335.23 58% Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Water CIP Project Growth Utilization Calculations Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects N/A indicates that the project is not eligble to be included for impact fees. Utilizations in red indicate that it is an adjusted value because it was over 100% due to the build out flow occuring in 2030 instead of 2050. System Improvement Projects Project Number Project Name Existing Peak Flow (gpm) 2030 Peak Flow (gpm) 2050 Peak Flow (gpm) 2020-2030 % Utilization NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" - Section 1 - 33.20 158.4 21% NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" - Section 2 - - 11.6 0% NT-S3 Town Creek Phase V 24"- 33.20 145.5 23% NT-S4**Upsize Lookout Line 275.40 223.80 256.6 20% NT-S5**Upsize Tri County Line 273.90 216.00 229.1 25% NT-S6 Cibolo West Main - 1,052.90 1,262.3 83% NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines, and Force Main - 702.60 785.2 89% NT SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A NT SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A NT SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station & Woman Hollering Creek WWTP N/A N/A N/A N/A 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line - 59.40 88.50 67% 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Road 8"- 0.53 10.30 5% 2030-S3 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 1 - 11.60 119.30 10% 2030-S4 Union Pacific Railroad 8" - Section 2 - 5.50 46.10 12% 2030-S5 Wiederstein Road 8"- 160.90 195.00 83% 2030-S6 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 1 - 42.30 128.80 33% 2030-S7 Schaefer Road 8" - Section 2 - 7.20 7.20 100% 2030-S8 Aranda 8"- 3.20 3.20 100% 2030-S9 Weir Road 10"- 597.00 597.60 100% 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Road 10"- 31.90 32.00 100% 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Road 8"- 122.60 126.70 97% 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"- 9.80 24.50 40% 2030-S13 I-10 8" - Section 1 - 67.20 68.10 99% 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"- 12.30 42.90 29% 2030-S15 N Greytown Road 8"- 45.70 88.10 52% 2030 SI-1**Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize 769.20 1,114.10 1,538.10 22% 2030 SI-2**Fairlawn WW Upsize 658.40 722.70 727.20 9% 2030 SI-3**Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize 1,439.40 1,382.60 1,576.50 4% 2030 SI-4**Woodland Oak Drive Replacements 784.00 820.60 900.30 4% 2030 SI-5**Old Wiederstein WW Upsize 1,908.30 5,034.00 5,092.50 61% 2030 SI-6**Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade 3,824.00 4,048.70 4,485.00 5% 2030 SI-7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station N/A N/A N/A N/A City of Schertz 2024 Impact Fee Update Wastewater CIP Project Growth Utilization Calculations N/A indicates that the project is not eligble to be included for impact fees. Utilizations in red indicate that it is an adjusted value because it was over 100% due to the build out flow occuring in 2030 instead of 2050. Near Term CIP System Improvement Projects Growth Projects System Improvement Projects Proposed 2030 CIP Growth Projects APPENDIX 31 - OCTAVE METER SPECIFICATIONS Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com Bottom load multi-Jet meters 1 Master Meter’s Multi-Jet meter exceeds the AWWA C708 standard. With sensitivity to measure water flowing as low as 1/8 gallon per minute and accuracy unaffected by common particulates and build-up that would freeze other types, you can count on our Multi-Jet technology. Technical Specifications: AWWA Standard -Meets or exceeds all sections of AWWA Standard C-708, most recent revision. Compliant with SDWA, NSF ANSI 372 and NSF ANSI 61 standards. Register - Standard Direct Read, DIALOG® 3G AMR System registers, AccuLinx Encoder, and IP 68 Electrical Output registers available. Together, an integrated and migratable technology environment is attained; direct, proximity (touch), mobile AMR, and Fixed Network AMI. Register Sealing - Direct Read and DIALOG registers are permanently sealed with a scratch resistant glass lens, stainless steel base and wrap-around gasket to prevent intrusion of dirt or moisture. Features & Benefits: • Rugged basket strainer built from advanced polymer materials for superior wear mitigation. • Proprietary design produces smooth, laminar flow profile for improved accuracy • Award-winning DIALOG 3G register design houses all vital components - encoder, RF transmitter, battery and antennae - safely within the register’s stainless steel and tempered glass enclosure. Free of external wires, components and connections - the #1 cause of field related issues on competitive designs. • Assures compliance with the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). • Measures with only one moving part that is hydro- dynamically balanced on a sapphire bearing to preserve accuracy and promote a positive bottom line. • Exceptional performance in passing entrained solids and operating in environments with high mineral content. • Clean, elegant measurement design is highly sensitive to leaks and low flow while limiting wear for excellent revenue protection. Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com Bottom load multi-Jet meters 2 Accuracy and Head Loss Chart 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 ACCURACY% HEAD LOSS NO R M A L AW W A C 7 0 8 L O W 103.0% 101.5% 100% 98.5% 97.0%10 P.S.I. 3/4” 5/8” 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 1” 5/8 and 3/4” 1” 0 METER  OPERATING  CHARACTERISTIC/DIMENSION 5/8"3/4"  x  7-­‐1/2"3/4"  x  9"3/4"  x  9"  x  1"1” Flow  Rating  (gpm)20 30 30 30 50 Continuous  Flow  (gpm)15 20 20 20 30 Normal  Flow  Range  (gpm)1-­‐20 2-­‐30 2-­‐30 2-­‐30 3-­‐50 Extended  Low  Flow  (gpm)1/4 1/2 1/2 1/2 3/4 Maximum  Working  Pressure  (psi)150 150 150 150 150 Maximum  Working  Temperature  (F)120 120 120 120 120 Length  (A  below)7-­‐1/2"7-­‐1/2"9"9"10-­‐3/4" Width  (B  below)3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"3-­‐5/8"4" Height,  standard  register  with  lid  (C  below)5"5"5"5"5-­‐1/4" Height,  bottom  to  center  line  (D  below)1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐1/2"1-­‐3/4" Weight  (lbs)3.95 4.0 4.1 4.6 5.25 Packed  To  Carton 6 6 6 4 4 Carton  Weight  (lbs)25.1 25.4 26 19.8 22.4 Technical Specs (Cont’d): • Register Unit - Registration available in U.S. gallons, cubic feet or cubic meters. • Test Circle - Large center sweep hand with one hundred (100) clearly marked gradations on the periphery of the dial face (available on Direct Read and DIALOG 3G registers). • Design/Operation - Velocity-type flow measurement. Water that is evenly distributed by multiple converging inlet ports flows past an impeller in the measuring chamber, creating an impeller velocity directly proportional to water flow rate. The meter’s register integrates that velocity into totalized flow. An inherent advantage for this design is unparalleled wear mitigation leading to sustained revenues. The register assembly is removable under line pressure permitting seamless, simplified upgrades in reading technology. • Strainer - A rugged, 360-degree advance polymer basket strainer protects the critical measuring element from damage. The unique strainer design smoothes the flow of water entering into the meter creating a laminar flow that is gentle on the meter’s internal components. Tough materials operating in a smooth, balanced environment enable the meters to perform more accurately over time. Utilities’ investments last longer while capturing more revenue. • Measuring Chamber - The measuring chamber housing and measurement element are built with an advanced synthetic polymer. Measurement surfaces are not wear surfaces, providing sustained accuracy despite the presence of entrained solids in the water. A long life, synthetic sapphire bearing serves as a wear surface with radially balanced water flows. The chamber housing is constructed in two parts to allow access to the impeller. Bottom plates available in Bronze, Cast Iron (CI) or Engineered Plastic. B D C A Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com 1 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC METER® Features & Benefits: • Grade 316 Stainless Steel (2"-8") or Epoxy Coated Ductile Iron (10"-12") body design provides full compliance with ANSI/NSF 372 (AB1953 or NSF61G). • No moving parts. Minimal flow intrusion. Enduring accuracy. • Easy to install Floating Flanges on 2"-8" and Integrated Flanges on 10"-12". • No required strainer. • Wide beam ultrasonic measurement sensors for high accuracy and reliable operation. • Industry standard communication protocol for integration with most third-party AMR/AMI systems. • Active leak, burst, reverse flow, empty pipe, measurement failure, and low battery. LCD also displays rate of flow and water temperature. • Ruggedized NEMA 6P/IP-68+ construction; fully submersible design. • Designed to meet standards for both North American and International C&I water meters. • Optional flow measurements; Forward Only, Net Volume or Alternating Display (Forward and Reverse Consumption displayed separately). Octave brings the latest in ultrasonic metering technology to Commercial/Industrial (C&I) water meters and puts precise measurement where the real flows exist. An excellent alternative to mechanical compound, single-jet, floating ball, fire-service type and turbine meters, Octave excels at maintaining sustained accuracy for the life of the meter while providing smart AMR capabilities. Technical Specifications: Working Pressure - 175 PSI Liquid Temperature - 33° - 122 °F Metrological Characteristics - Meets ANSI/AWWA Standards C715-18, C750-19, ISO 4064 rev. 2014 Configuration - Compact-Display built into unit Power Source - 2 x D Size Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries - 10 year warranted life time Environmental Protection - NEMA 6P+ (IP68+), Ambient operation temp. -13 °F / +131 °F for the display Display Units - Multi line 12 digit LCD (Programmable USG, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Acre Feet for volume and GPM, Lt/s, or M³/h for rate of flow) Output - Programmable Encoder, Pulse, 4-20, or Modbus; Optional dual output available in encoder + pulse Available in sizes 1.5", 2", 3", 4", 6", 8", 10", and 12" UL Certification is available on 1.5" through 8" only. FM Approval is available on all sizes. Master Meter // 101 Regency Parkway // Mansfield, TX 76063 // www.mastermeter.com 2 OCTAVE ULTRASONIC METER® Performance Data & Dimensions NOTE — For Performance charts please see Engineering Document - Octave | Version 10.17. v1202.20F 1.5"x13"2"x10"2"x15.25"2"x17" (40 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm) 250 GPM 250 GPM 250 GPM 250 GPM (57 m3/h)(57 m3/h)(57 m3/h)(57 m3/h) 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM 0.50 – 250 GPM (0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h)(0.11 – 57 m3/h) 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM 0.25 GPM (0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h)(0.06 m3/h) 13"10"15.25"17" (330 mm)(250 mm)(390 mm)(432 mm) 5-3/4"5-3/4"5-3/4"5-3/4" (146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm) 6-3/4"6-3/4"6-3/4"6-3/4" (172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm) 2-1/8"2-1/8"2-1/8"2-1/8" (54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm) 20 lbs 15 lbs 22 lbs 24 lbs (9 kg)(7 kg)(10 kg)(11 kg) • +/- 1.5% in the Normal Operating Range • +/- 5% in the Extended Low Flow Height Height from Center Pipe Weight * In the water temperature of 45° to 85° F (7° to 30° C), meter consumption is accurately measured at: Octave Operating Characteristics and Dimensions Safe Maximum Operating Capacity Normal Operating Range (98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy)* Extended Low Flow (95% - 105% Accuracy) Length Width 3"4"6"8"10"12" (80 mm)(100 mm)(150 mm)(200 mm)(250 mm)(300 mm) 500 GPM 1,000 GPM 1,600 GPM 2,800 GPM 5,500 GPM 5,500 GPM (114 m3/h)(227 m3/h)(363 m3/h)(636 m3/h)(1,250 m3/h)(1,250 m3/h) 1 – 500 GPM 1.5 – 1,000 GPM 3 – 1,600 GPM 5 – 2,800 GPM 14 – 5,500 GPM 14 – 5,500 GPM (0.23 – 114 m3/h)(0.34 – 227 m3/h)(0.68 – 363 m3/h)(1.5 – 636 m3/h)(3.2 – 1,250 m3/h)(3.2 – 1,250 m3/h) 0.5 GPM 0.75 GPM 2 GPM 4 GPM 8 GPM 8 GPM (0.11 m3/h)(0.17 m3/h)(0.45 m3/h)(0.9 m3/h)(1.8 m3/h)(1.8 m3/h) 12"14"18"20"17-3/4"19-3/4" (305 mm)(356 mm)(457 mm)(508 mm)(451 mm)(502 mm) 7-1/2"9"11"13-1/2"16"19-3/4" (190 mm)(229 mm)(280 mm)(343 mm)(406 mm)(502 mm) 8-1/2"9-7/8"10-7/8"12-7/8"16-1/2"19-3/4" (216 mm)(250 mm)(276 mm)(327 mm)(419 mm)(502 mm) 3-1/2"4-1/2"5-1/8"6-3/8"8"9-7/8" (90 mm)(115 mm)(130 mm)(162 mm)(203 mm)(251 mm) 23 lbs 35 lbs 51 lbs 78 lbs 150 lbs 210 lbs (10.5 kg)(16 kg)(23 kg)(35 kg)(68 kg)(96 kg) • +/- 1.5% in the Normal Operating Range • +/- 5% in the Extended Low Flow Height Height from Center Pipe Weight * In the water temperature of 45° to 85° F (7° to 30° C), meter consumption is accurately measured at: Octave Operating Characteristics and Dimensions Safe Maximum Operating Capacity Normal Operating Range (98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy)* Extended Low Flow (95% - 105% Accuracy) Length Width MMPCS090111 The Octave vs. Compounds & Turbines Product Comparison Sheet The origin of the modern day turbine meter dates back to the late 18th century and has evolved into a reliable way of measuring high volumes of water. Since 1914 compound meters have served a place in the market by capturing unaccounted for water in many applications when compared to traditional turbine meters. While changes in both designs have improved meter accuracy there is still room for improvement due to poor low flow registration (in turbines), costly repairs, head loss, decreased accuracy in the changeover flow rates (in compounds), and short term sustained accuracy. With the introduction of the Octave ultrasonic water meter, the industry now has a meter capable of accurately measuring both high volume water usage while still capturing low flows and providing leakage alerts with none of the limitations of a compound or turbine. Benefits: 1. No moving parts: Compound meters require water to be measured through 2 separate measuring elements; one for high flows and a secondary meter for low flows. In addition the compound meter requires an automatic valve mechanism for diverting flow through the appropriate measuring device. Traditional compound meters can have upwards of 50-75 moving parts. Turbine meters have one measuring element for capturing intermediate and high flows. Most turbine meters can have upwards of 25 moving parts. The Octave meter has absolutely no moving parts and thus eliminates the need of any maintenance or repair or the requirement of installing a strainer. However if the utility would like to prevent larger suspended particles from entering the customer’s line a strainer may be installed without adversely affecting the meter. 2. Sustained meter accuracy: As with all mechanical devices, compound and turbine meters are subject to damage or wear which has a negative effect on meter accuracy and the utility’s revenue. Using the latest in ultrasonic transit time technology the Octave meter is capable of maintaining new meter accuracy for the life of the meter without the need for calibration or routine maintenance. 3. Low flow accuracy & starting flow: With flow sensitivity starting as low as 1/16 gpm, the Octave is the only solid state meter capable of matching the minimum test flow rates of the AWWA standard for compound meters (2” – 4”) and far exceeds the low flow rates of the AWWA standard for typical turbines (all sizes). Size Octave Low Flow *C701 Low Flow ** C702 Low Flow 2” ¼ gpm @ 95% 4 gpm @ 98.5% ¼ gpm @ 95% 3” ½ gpm @95% 8 gpm @ 98.5% ½ gpm @ 95 % 4” ¾ gpm @95% 15 gpm @ 98.5% ¾ gpm @ 95% 6” 2 gpm @ 95% 30 gpm @ 98.5% 1 ½ gpm @ 95% 8” 4 gpm @ 95% 50 gpm @ 98.5% 2 gpm @ 95% *C701 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Turbine Type **C702 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Compound Type 4. No changeover: An inherent weakness with compound meters is the point when flow begins to changeover from one chamber to the other. Depending on the make and model, meter accuracy can drop as low as 90% on older compound models and approximately 94% - 97% on newer compound models. The Octave eliminates changeover and provides optimal meter accuracy at all flow that should result in more revenue for the utility. 5. High flow: Occasionally a compound is not the right meter for the job when a customer’s flow demand exceeds the meter’s safe maximum flow. To prevent unwanted wear to the compound the utility would typically install a turbine meter and hope the customer was not also operating below the meter’s low flow capacity during non-peak demand. The Octave meter allows you to accurately measure both low and high flows without sacrificing meter accuracy. MMPCS090111 Size Octave Safe Maximum Flow *C701 Safe Maximum Flow *C701 % of Improvement **C702 Safe Maximum Flow **C702 % of Improvement 2” 250 gpm 190 gpm 24% 160 gpm 36% 3” 500 gpm 435 gpm 13% 350 gpm 30% 4” 1,000 gpm 750 gpm 25% 600 gpm 40% 6” 1,600 gpm 1,600 gpm 20% 1,350 gpm 32.5% 8” 2,800 gpm 2,800 gpm 20% 1,600 gpm 54.3% *C701 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Turbine Type **C702 is the AWWA Standard for Cold Water Meters, Compound Type 6. Head loss: With no internal parts to cause friction the Octave by design decreases head loss which in turn lowers pumping costs for the utility and decreases the number of complaints of poor pressure by the customer. Compared to a typical compound meter, the head loss of the Octave can decrease head loss by up to 93% at comparable flow rates and up to 90% in turbines. At C701 Safe Max Flow Improvement At C702 Safe Max Flow Improvement Size Turbines vs. Octave vs. Turbines Compounds vs. Octave vs. Compounds 2" 5.08 PSI 0.80 PSI 84% 7.05 PSI 0.74 PSI 90% 3" 5.44 PSI 2.00 PSI 63% 6.88 PSI 1.15 PSI 83% 4" 7.30 PSI 3.00 PSI 59% 8.90 PSI 1.89 PSI 79% 6" 6.14 PSI 0.69 PSI 89% 8.32 PSI 0.55 PSI 93% 8" 3.48 PSI 1.87 PSI 46% 7.70 PSI 0.66 PSI 91% #Head loss improvements are determined by taking an average head loss for each meter type at the Safe Maximum Flow per the applicable standard then comparing it to the Octave at the same rate of flow. Results vary based on the specific model when compared to the Octave. 7. Meter Oversizing / Undersizing / Improper Application: Lost revenue and/or meter damage can occur if the meter is not sized properly or if the meter installed is not best suited for the customer’s usage profile. The Octave operates well in almost every application, eliminating the question of which meter to use or what size to use. 8. Technology: The Octave comes with built in standard display alerts such as leak detection, flow direction, empty pipe, and battery level icon, and offers the scalability to include data logging, impact alerts such as tampering, backflow, theft and zero consumption when connected to Master Meter’s XTR endpoint. The technology advantages of the Octave far exceed the capabilities of today’s compound and turbine meters. 9. Weight: Less parts needed to build a meter equates to manufacturing a meter that weighs considerably less than compounds and turbines resulting in reducing the number of field staff and equipment needed to install or replace meters and environmental benefits such as reducing your carbon footprint. Size Octave Weight ##Turbine Avg. Weight Improvement vs. Turbine ##Compound Avg. Weight Improvement vs. Compound 2" 26 lbs 25 lbs +4% 39 lbs 33% 3" 36 lbs 40 lbs 10% 68 lbs 47% 4" 48.5 lbs 54 lbs 10% 86 lbs 44% 6" 99 lbs 108 lbs 8% 155 lbs 36% 8" 136 lbs 186 lbs 27% 379 lbs 64% ## Comparisons of weight are between various compound and turbine models. The level of improvement was based on average weight per size and type. Results vary based on the specific model when compared to the Octave. 10. Price: For all of these added features you would expect to pay much more for a superior product but that is not the case. Priced between a turbine and a compound the Octave exceeds all the advantages of a traditional compound or turbine. Octave Installation Guide Category: C & I Metering Type: Installation Manual Issue: Operation Version 01.19  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 2 of 16 Table of Contents Octave Installation Manual 1 General Information Page 1. Introduction 3 2. Package Contents 3 3. General Safety 3 4. Unpacking Instructions 3 2 Technical Data 1. Measurement Method 4 2. Mechanical Data 4 3. Dimensions and Scaled Drawings 5 4. Performance Data 5 5. Pressure Loss Charts 6 3 Installation Requirements 1. Pre-Installation 7 2. Handling the Octave 7 3. Installation Notes 7 4. Installation Location & Position 8 5. Additional Installation Requirements 9 4 Register Display and Output 1. Digital Display 10 2. Pulse Output (Open Drain) 11 3. Pulse Output (SSR Dry Contact) 12 4. 4-20 mA (Analog) 13 5. Encoder Output (Serial) 14 6. No Output (Manual read) 14 7. Installation of Output Module 15 8. Wire Connectivity Chart 16  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 3 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 1 – General Information 1.1 Introduction Thank you for choosing Master Meter’s Octave Ultrasonic Meter. This unique design delivers precise flow measurement without any moving parts for long life, sustained accuracy and exceptional performance. The following information within this guide will help you gain a better understanding of the many features and capabilities your new Octave Ultrasonic meter has to offer. 1.2 Package Contents and Documentation • One complete Octave Ultrasonic Flow Meter (meter body with integral electronics), size as indicated on the packaging box. • Octave User Installation Guide • Certificate of calibration data (adhered to the inside of the meter lid) • (Optional) If specified at the time of order; one output module 1.3 General Safety Prior to installation of your new Octave Ultrasonic Meter please consider the following; • Do not install, operate or maintain this flow meter without reading, understanding and following the factory-supplied instructions. Otherwise, injury or damage may result. • Read instructions carefully before beginning installation and save them for future reference. • Observe all warnings and instructions marked on the product. • Consider handling and lifting instructions to avoid damage. • If the product does not operate normally, refer to the service instructions or to a qualified Master Meter representative. • There are no operator-serviceable parts inside this product. 1.4 Unpacking Instructions and Inspection This product has been thoroughly inspected and tested prior to shipment and is ready for operation. After carefully unpacking the meter, inspect all contents for shipping damage before attempting to install. If here is any indication of physical damage found, immediately contact the responsible transportation service and your local Master Meter representative. Note: The LCD display remains active for the life of the meter. If the display is not on, this may be an indication of damage during shipment.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 4 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.1 Measurement Method The Octave’s measurement method is based on an ultrasonic, transit time, dual beam sensor array which determines the length of time it takes an ultrasonic sound wave to travel the distance between the two sensors located in the meter’s body. The two sensors function as both the transmitter and the receiver, each one alternating these functions so that the ultrasonic wave travels both with and against the direction of the flow. Ultrasonic waves travel slower against the flow than with the flow, thus the time difference of two waves traveling with and against the flow leads to determining the velocity and volume of the water. Note: These sensors are ultra-sensitive; they are not designed to be modified by the user. Any modifications void warranty on this product. • The Octave ultrasonic flow meter is a battery-powered, precision flow meter designed for linear, bidirectional flow measurement of water. • Flow measurement data is communicated through the output module. • The Octave can be set up for a wide range of applications. 2.2 Mechanical Data Maximum Working Pressure 175 PSI Liquid Temperature 32.1° F - 122° F (0.1° C to 50° C) Referenced Standards Meets ANSI / AWWA Standard C715-18 & C750-10; ISO 4064 rev. 2005 Configuration Compact - Display built into unit Power Source 2 x D size Lithium Thionyl Chloride batteries - 10 year warranted life time Environmental Protection NEMA 6P (IP68), Ambient operation temperature -13° F to 131° F (- 25° C to 55° C) Data Units Multi-line 12 digit Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) - Programmable USG, Imperial Gallons, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Barrels, Acre Feet or Acre Inch for Volume and GPM, Lt/s,Lt/m or M3/h for rate of flow. Volume Display Options 1. Net Volume (Forward measurement minus reverse) 2. Forward Only 3. Alternating Flow (Forward and Reverse flow displayed separately) Flanges ANSI / AWWA C702 • 2” Oval Type – Cast Iron Floating Flange • 3” – 8” Round Type – Cast Iron Floating Flange • 8 – 12” Round Type – Cast Iron Fixed Flange Meter Body Construction 2” – 8” Grade 316 Stainless Steel 10” – 12” Ductile Iron Epoxy Coated Output (optional) 1. Dual Digital Pulses (Open Drain or Dry Contact) 2. 4-20 mA (Powered loop) 3. Encoder Output (up to 8 digit encoded readings) Certifications/Listings • UL Certified – Safety US EX29710 on 2” – 8” Stainless Steel Floating Flange • FM Approved on 2” – 12” Stainless Steel and Ductile Iron • ANSI / NSF 372 (AB1953 or NSF61G)  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 5 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.3 Dimensions 2.4 Performance Data Model 2" x 10"2"x13"2"x15.25"2"x17"3"4"6"8"10"12" (50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(50 mm)(80 mm)(100 mm)(150 mm)(200 mm)(250 mm)(300 mm) 10"13"15.25"17"12"14"18"20"17 3/4"19 3/4" (250 mm)(330 mm)(390 mm)(432 mm)(305 mm)(356 mm)(457 mm)(508 mm)(451 mm)(502 mm) 5 3/4"5 3/4"5 3/4"5 3/4"7 1/2"9"11"13 1/2"16"19 3/4" (146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(146 mm)(190 mm)(229 mm)(280 mm)(343 mm)(406 mm)(502 mm) 6 3/4"6 3/4"6 3/4"6 3/4"8 1/2"9 7/8"10 7/8"12 7/8"16 1/2"19 3/4" (172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(172 mm)(216 mm)(250 mm)(276 mm)(327 mm)(419 mm)(502 mm) 2 1/8"2 1/8"2 1/8"2 1/8"3 1/2"4 1/2"5 1/8"6 3/8"8"9 7/8" (54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(54 mm)(90 mm)(115 mm)(130 mm)(162 mm)(203 mm)(251 mm) 150 lbs.210 lbs. (68 kg)(96 kg) 15 lbs 20 lbs 22 lbs 24 lbs 23 lbs 35 lbs.51 lbs. 78 lbs. (7 kg)(9 kg)(10 kg)(11 kg)(10.5 kg)(16 kg)(23 kg)(35 kg) 2" Octave is offered in 10" length with an optional add-on of a 3", a 5.25" or a 7" spool. Gaskets, nuts, bots, & washers are included in weights of 13", 15.25" and 17". Octave - - C - Center Pipe Height Weight - Stainless Steel Weight - Ductile Iron - ------- W - Width H - Height Nominal Size L - Length Solid FlangeFloating Flanges Octave Extended Low Flow Normal Flow Range ‡ Continuous Linearity Range Nominal Size 95% - 105% Accuracy 98.5% - 101.5% Accuracy Safe Max Flow +/- 0.5% Maximum Deviation inch (mm)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s)GPM (Lt/s) 2" (50mm) 1/4 (.016) 1/2 - 250 (.032 - 15.77) 250 (15.77) 4 - 200 (.25 - 12.62) 3" (80 mm) 1/2 (.032) 1 - 500 (.06 - 31.54) 500 (31.54) 5 - 350 (.32 - 22.08) 4" (100 mm) 3/4 (.047) 1-1/2 - 1,000 (.09 - 63.09) 1000 (63.09) 15 - 700 (.94 - 44.16) 6" (150 mm) 2 (.13) 3 - 1,600 (.19 - 100.94) 1,600 (100.94) 20 - 1,150 (1.26 - 72.55) 8" (200 mm) 4 (.25) 5 - 2,800 (.32 - 176.65) 2,800 (176.65) 50 - 2,000 (3.15 - 126.18) 10" (250 mm) 8 (.50) 14 - 5,500 (.88 - 346.99) 5,500 (346.99) 400 - 4,000 (25.24 - 252.36) 12" (300 mm) 8 (.50) 14 - 5,500 (.88 - 346.99) 5,500 (346.99) 400 - 4,000 (25.24 - 252.36) ‡ Continuous Safe Max Flow ranges listed for the Octave are for accurate flow measurement only and do not limit the Octave from meeting the Short-term Deluge Flow for fire services.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 6 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 2 – Technical Data 2.5 Pressure Loss Charts  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 7 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.1 Pre-Installation Prior to installation check the following: • Flow rate and volume units are correctly programmed. • The flow meter is correctly installed per the installation location and position recommendations. • Output modules are correctly attached. 3.2 Handling of Octave IMPORTANT: • DO NOT use chains or wire cable to lift the Octave. To protect the epoxy coating, only use a nylon lifting strap with appropriate weight capacity. • DO NOT lift the Octave by the electronic housing unit. • DO NOT carry the Octave by its lid. • DO NOT use bolt holes for grip when carrying the Octave. • DO NOT position the flow meter on its electronic housing unit. • When bolting the meter to pipe flanges, use washers on both nuts and bolts to protect the epoxy coating of the Octave. • When handling the flow meter avoid hard blows, jolts or impact. 3.3 Installation Notes The measuring tube should be completely full at all times for proper flow measurements. When sensors are not wet this will show a loss of signal. Though this will not cause damage to the meter, it will however not measure flow. FLOW DIRECTION: The Octave is a bi-directional flow meter. Note the indicating arrow for forward and backward flows. Master Meter recommends keeping the lid closed in case of direct sunlight exposure. However, no direct damage will occur while the lid is open temporarily. Do not expose the meter to excessive vibration. To prevent this from occurring, support the connection pipe spools on both ends of the flow meter. To avoid measuring errors due to air or an empty pipe, please observe the following precautions: • Installation of the flow meter should be at the lowest point of the system, if possible, since air will be collected at the highest point of a system. • If possible, maintain positive back pressure in meter outlet piping. • In order to avoid cavitation, always install control valves downstream of the flow meter and never install the flow meter on a pump suction side.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 8 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.4 Installation Location & Position Proper Installation Improper Installation Conditional Installation Recommended: If this is not the highest point in the system or a hydraulic jump has been installed to keep the flow meter full. The system has back pressured. Not recommended: If this is the highest point in a system or if pipeline and/or flow meter is subject to being emptied between uses avoid this installation.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 9 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 3 – Installation Requirements 3.5 Additional installation requirements Two (2) pipe diameters before & after elbows (90°) Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before or after isolation valves Open bore valves, such as resilient wedge gate valves can be bolted directly to the meter. Minimum of ten (10) pipe diameters after pump discharge. Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before tee connections, including test tees. Minimum of two (2) pipe diameters before or after strainers for ISO version Octaves (primarily sold outside North American Market). AWWA length Octaves (primarily sold in North American markets) may be bolted directly to a strainer. Two (2) pipe diameters before and after elbows (90°) in vertical installations  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 10 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.1 Digital Display The Octave meter comes with a factory programmable digital display built to your specifications. At the time of order you can select: • Volume units in US gallons, Imperial gallons, Cubic Feet, Cubic Meters, Barrels, Acre Feet or Acre Feet o US Gallons will display a constant GAL on the LCD o Imperial Gallons will display a constant IGAL on the LCD • Rate of flow measurement in US Gallons per Minute, Imperial Gallons per Minute, Liters per Second, Liters per Minute or Cubic Meters per Hour • A programmable decimal with flow measurement as low as 1/1000th of a measurement unit. • Single output mode in either encoder (UI1203), digital pulse (open drain or dry contact), 4-20 mA, or no output mode • Dual output mode (optional) in encoder + open drain digital pulse • Volume Display Option in either Net Flow, Forward Only, or Alternating. o Net Volume – The meter measures both forward and reverse flow. If backward flow is detected, the totalizer will begin to decrease. o Forward Flow Only – The meter measures forward flow only. Reverse flow is disregarded. o Alternating Flow – The totalizer will display only forward flow, then toggle to display only reverse flow. The timing of the how long each measurement is displayed is programmable with this software version. Flow Direction Communication Volume Units Flow Rate Units Empty Pipe / Error Pulse Resolution Accumulation Mode Water Temperature Alarms / Alerts Additional Output Modes Sleep Mode – After 24 hours of an empty pipe the meter will switch to sleep pipe. Checksum – After 1 minute of no flow, the meter will flash a series of letters and numbers in place of the rate of flow to show the checksum of the software version.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 11 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.2 Pulse Output (Open Drain) Pulse Type: Open Drain that allows current loading of 200 mA, and up to 30 VDC. Output Type Open drain Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Maximum Supply Voltage 30 VDC Wire Color Function Long cable Red Pulse Out #1 Green Pulse Out #2 Black Common Bare Wire Shield Pulse Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics Warning: Signal connection polarity is mandatory * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 12 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.3 Pulse Output (SSR Dry Contact) Pulse Type: Dry Contact that allows current loading of 120 mA, and up to 35 volts. Output Type SSR Dry Contact Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Output Voltage max. + 400 (V) Output Current max. 120 mA (.12 A) Supply Voltage 3-35 VDC Wire Color Function Long cable Red Output #1 Orange Output #1 Black Output #2 Brown Output #2 Short cable Red 24V + Black 24V - Yellow GROUND Pulse Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics Warning: Signal Polarity is mandatory on Short Cable wires but is not mandatory on Long Cable wires. * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 13 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.4 4-20 mA Output (Analog Communication) The current output is a passive 4-20 mA. Power must be provided by the customer. 4 mA is always “0” (zero) flow and the 20 mA is factory programmable according to the customer’s requirements. (If the customer has not specified the 20 mA at the time of order, the Octave will be programmed with the 20 mA at the max flow of the meter.) Output Type 4-20 mA passive current output Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Cable Length* 1,640 feet Loop Supply Voltage 12 - 24 VDC Output Impedance 25 (mΩ) typ. Wire Color Function Long cable Red Current loop + Black Current loop - Bare Wire Shield Warning: Signal connection polarity is mandatory 4-20 Module Wire Colors Output Characteristics * The maximum cable length depends on: cable type, controller, and electrical noise level.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 14 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.5 Encoder Output • UI1203 encoder open communication, with a maximum reading up to 8 digits, depending on the programming of the attached output module • Encoder digits are represented by lines above each digit transmitted to an AMR or AMI on the volume totalizer. • Serial communication collector • Data output line is a solid state switch requiring external pull-up • AMI Type for Encoder is : 0 Wire Function Red Power Green Data Black Ground 4.6 No Output (Manual Read) The Octave meter can be programmed to not send a communication signal at the customer’s request; however Master Meter recommends selecting a communication mode for future migration to AMR or AMI. Output Type Encoder Cable Length - Supplied 9 feet Maximum Supply Voltage 15 Vdc Maximum Power Load .04 Vdc Output Characteristics Encoder Module Wire Colors  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 15 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 2 Allen Screws 3mm x 20mm Washer Pic. 1 3mm Allen Key Octave Module Pic. 2 Pic. 3 Pic. 4 Pic. 5 Pic. 6 Pic. 7 Pic. 8 Pic. 9 4.7 Output Module Installation (Optional) All Octave water meters are shipped with either a cover plate or communication module installed on the side of each meter. Even if the meter is not going to be read by radio or some other electronic unit, it is important to leave one of these devices installed on the Octave to prevent damage to the communication port. Installing an Octave without a cover plate or communication module would void any warranty. If you received an Output Module separate from your Octave meter, please follow the steps below to ensure proper installation of the module. Read through these instructions before attempting to remove the cover plate. Your module came as a complete installation kit with the supplies shown in Pic. 1. Octave Output Module Installation Parts Step 1: Remove the Sealing Cap from the cover plate (Pic. 2). Step 2: Using the 3mm Allen Key provided, remove the cover plate (Pic. 3). Keep the cover plate and 3mm x 15mm screws for future use. The communication port is now exposed. (Pic. 4) Step 3: Place washer around the 4-prong plug of the output module. (Pic. 5 & 6) Step 4: Insert Output Module into the communication port (Pic. 7), with the cable pointing down. This will allow the slot inside the communication port to align with the groove on the module. Do not force the module into the communication port. This may cause damage to the pins. Secure into place using the 3mm x 20mm screws provided. Tighten until the screws stop. (Pic. 8) Step 5: Push the Sealing Cap into the lower screw hole (Pic. 9). Lock the Sealing Cap in place by firmly pushing in into place or gently tapping it in with a small hammer. Note: If at any time the module needs to be removed, take caution not to allow dirt or water into the communication port. If the module is going to be removed for an extended period of time, reinstall the cover plate and the 3mm x 15mm screws.  Master Meter, Inc. 101 Regency Parkway, Mansfield, TX 76063 T: 817-842 -8000 MasterMeter.com Page 16 of 16 Octave Installation Manual Chapter 4 – Register & Output Mode 4.8 Wire Connectivity Chart The following chart is designed to assist in wiring the Octave module to various AMR/AMI Radios. The Octave transmits up to 8 digit output encoder output. Pulse output resolution is available in resolutions of x0.1, x1, x10, x1,000, or x10,000. By default Octave encoder modules are provided with Nicor connectors, however you may also select Itron Connectors, magnetic inductor coils for wall or pit mount, for bare wire. Nicor connectors are factory potted. All other connectors are spliced with water resistant heat shrink wrap. Manufacturer Model Communication Type Octave Red Wire Octave Green Wire Octave Black Wire Aclara Star 3000 Series Encoder Red White Black Star 3000 Series Pulse Red N/A Black or White Badger Orion Encoder Red Green Black Datamatic Firefly Encoder Red White Black Mosaic Encoder Red Green Black Elster MTU Encoder White Red Black MTU Pulse Red White Green Hersey Hot Rod Encoder Red Green or White Black Itron 60w Encoder Green Red Unshielded 60wp Pulse Red N/A White 100w Encoder Grey Brown Yellow Kemp Meeks Visu-Link VL-9S Pulse Polarity does not matter - Connect Red and Black Wires to either terminal, disregard green wire Visu-Link VL-9 Encoder Red Green Black Master Meter Allegro PT Encoder Red Green Black Universal XTR Encoder Red Green Black Fast Pulse XTR Pulse Red N/A Black Metron Farnier (T2) T2 M2w Encoder Red Green Black Neptune R900 Encoder Black Red Green Sensus MXU Pit Unit Encoder Red Green Black MXU Wall Unit Encoder Red Green Black Touch Pad Encoder Red Green Black *Note – when connecting to Master Meter’s Allegro PT or 3G XTR, the Octave will typically output an 8 digit reading, unless otherwise specified. When connecting to another manufacturer’s radio or read device, it is recommended to confirm with that provider what the actual reading resolution of the connecting device is. APPENDIX 32 - WILLDAN REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATIONS & SUMMARY November 25 2024 Mr. James Walters Finance Director City of Schertz 1400 Schertz Parkway Bldg. 2 Schertz TX 78154 Dear Mr. Walters: Per your request, we have completed a calculation of the credit from utility revenues that would be generated by new service units during the ten-year period of the City’s proposed water and wastewater impact fees. This credit to the growth-related cost component of the impact fee calculation is required under Local Government Code Chapter 395 to ensure that new service units are not double-charged for impact fee related capital improvements. Our scope of services is limited to this credit calculation; the City’s total water and wastewater impact fees are calculated by its consulting engineers. Summary Calculation Our credit calculation is summarized in the model presented as Appendix A to this letter. As shown in the appendix, we calculate the following impact-fee direct revenue credits: WATER Revenue Credit -- $3,365,530 WASTEWATER Revenue Credit -- $4,611,802 Key Assumptions As stated above, our contribution to the City’s impact fee calculations is limited to the water and wastewater revenue credit only; we bear no responsibility for the overall impact fee calculations. However, we coordinated our assumptions and calculations with City staff and the City’s consulting engineers. Specifically, we relied on the following critical assumptions in developing our revenue credits: 1) We assumed a ten-year period for the calculation, FY 2025 – FY 2034, consistent with guidelines set by Chapter 395. 2) We utilized Capital Improvement Plan cost estimates and percentages of each project allocable to growth developed by City staff and its consulting engineers. 3) Growth estimates were based on the latest forecasts as presented by the City’s consulting engineers. 4) Terms and interest rates for new debt forecast to be issued for growth-related improvements were based on estimates used in the City’s 2023 water and wastewater rate study. 5) We are interpreting Chapter 395 so that the debt allocable to growth-related projects includes both principal and interest. 6) Current debt allocable to growth-related projects was based on estimates provided by City staff. 7) The totals represent Net Present Values of the ten year cash flows utilizing a discount rate of 6.0%. In summary, we believe that the use of the revenue credits estimated in this summary letter and detailed in Appendix A are reasonable and in accordance with Chapter 395 guidelines. Thank you for this opportunity to serve you and the City of Schertz. Please let me know if you have any comments or questions. Respectfully submitted, WILLDAN FINANCIAL SERVICES Dan V. Jackson Vice President APPENDIX A Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Revenue Credit Summary Calculation Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WATER LUEs Total LUEs 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 New LUEs Annual 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 WATER Debt Service Current Principal 1,057,500$ 880,000$ 450,000$ 470,000$ 492,500$ 515,000$ 537,500$ 560,000$ 562,500$ 495,000$ Interest 382,755 338,481 306,869 286,019 265,281 243,956 221,931 200,019 178,519 157,806 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255 1,218,481 756,869 756,019 757,781 758,956 759,431 760,019 741,019 652,806 Future Principal - 185,227 190,784 884,493 911,028 2,049,721 2,111,213 2,174,549 2,239,786 2,306,979 Interest - 149,314 143,757 692,627 666,092 1,534,643 1,473,151 1,409,814 1,344,578 1,277,384 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 334,541 334,541 1,577,120 1,577,120 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 Total Principal 1,057,500 1,065,227 640,784 1,354,493 1,403,528 2,564,721 2,648,713 2,734,549 2,802,286 2,801,979 Interest 382,755 487,795 450,625 978,645 931,373 1,778,599 1,695,082 1,609,833 1,523,097 1,435,190 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255 1,553,022 1,091,409 2,333,139 2,334,901 4,343,320 4,343,795 4,344,382 4,325,382 4,237,170 Utility Revenue Credit Calculation Total Debt Service 1,440,255$ 1,553,022$ 1,091,409$ 2,333,139$ 2,334,901$ 4,343,320$ 4,343,795$ 4,344,382$ 4,325,382$ 4,237,170$ Total LUEs 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 Debt Service Per LUE Annual 47.72$ 50.01$ 34.16$ 70.97$ 69.03$ 124.80$ 121.31$ 117.92$ 114.10$ 108.64$ Monthly 3.98$ 4.17$ 2.85$ 5.91$ 5.75$ 10.40$ 10.11$ 9.83$ 9.51$ 9.05$ New LUEs -- Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 Water Revenue Credit Current Dollars 4,108,768$ 40,454$ 86,018$ 89,408$ 251,296$ 310,005$ 682,462$ 785,375$ 885,445$ 978,303$ 1,050,448$ Net Present Value 6.0%3,365,530$ CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Revenue Credit Summary Calculation Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER LUEs Total LUEs 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 New LUEs Annual 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 WASTEWATER Debt Service Current Principal 642,500$ 680,000$ 710,000$ 745,000$ 782,500$ 815,000$ 847,500$ 880,000$ 892,500$ 835,000$ Interest 508,655 477,156 444,043 409,818 374,955 340,380 307,705 276,343 244,887 213,493 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155 1,157,156 1,154,043 1,154,818 1,157,455 1,155,380 1,155,205 1,156,343 1,137,387 1,048,493 Future Principal - 846,752 872,155 1,771,533 1,824,679 2,726,171 2,807,956 2,892,195 2,978,961 3,068,330 Interest - 682,576 657,174 1,334,916 1,281,770 1,909,606 1,827,821 1,743,582 1,656,817 1,567,448 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 1,529,329 1,529,329 3,106,449 3,106,449 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 Total Principal 642,500 1,526,752 1,582,155 2,516,533 2,607,179 3,541,171 3,655,456 3,772,195 3,871,461 3,903,330 Interest 508,655 1,159,732 1,101,216 1,744,734 1,656,725 2,249,986 2,135,526 2,019,925 1,901,703 1,780,941 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155 2,686,485 2,683,371 4,261,266 4,263,904 5,791,157 5,790,982 5,792,120 5,773,164 5,684,270 Utility Revenue Credit Calculation Total Debt Service 1,151,155$ 2,686,485$ 2,683,371$ 4,261,266$ 4,263,904$ 5,791,157$ 5,790,982$ 5,792,120$ 5,773,164$ 5,684,270$ Total LUEs 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 Debt Service Per LUE Annual 35.16$ 79.88$ 77.68$ 120.11$ 117.01$ 154.73$ 150.64$ 146.70$ 142.36$ 136.47$ Monthly 2.93$ 6.66$ 6.47$ 10.01$ 9.75$ 12.89$ 12.55$ 12.22$ 11.86$ 11.37$ New LUEs -- Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 Wastewater Revenue Credit Current Dollars 5,540,163$ 30,373$ 139,895$ 206,847$ 432,245$ 533,604$ 858,409$ 988,529$ 1,115,461$ 1,234,800$ 1,333,688$ Net Present Value 6.0%4,611,802$ Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Current 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 LUE and Account Totals Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER LUES Forecast Annual Growth Rate 2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9%2.9% Total LUEs 29,334 30,182 31,054 31,951 32,875 33,825 34,802 35,808 36,843 37,908 39,003 Annual New LUEs New LUEs 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Cumulative 848 1,720 2,617 3,541 4,491 5,468 6,474 7,509 8,574 9,669 Monthly Bills 352,008 362,181 372,648 383,418 394,498 405,899 417,630 429,699 442,118 454,895 468,041 WASTEWATER LUES Forecast Annual Growth Rate 2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7%2.7% Total LUEs 31,880 32,744 33,631 34,543 35,479 36,440 37,428 38,442 39,484 40,554 41,653 Annual New LUEs New LUEs 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Cumulative 864 1,751 2,663 3,599 4,560 5,548 6,562 7,604 8,674 9,773 Monthly Bills 382,561 392,929 403,577 414,514 425,747 437,285 449,136 461,307 473,809 486,649 499,837 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 1 Series: 2013 GO Refunding Bonds 1A Total Bond 2,160,000$ Principal 215,000$ 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1B Percent Water/WW Water 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Wastewater 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1C Water Debt Service Principal 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1D Water Percent Growth and Replacement Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 215,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 2,774 - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 217,774 - - - - - - - - - 1F Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 1G Wastewater Percent Growth and Replacement Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 1H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 2 Series:2018 CO's 2A Total Bond 10,440,000$ Principal 2,910,000$ 235,000$ 250,000$ 260,000$ 275,000$ 290,000$ 300,000$ 310,000$ 320,000$ 330,000$ 340,000$ Interest 162,049 149,925 137,174 123,799 109,674 96,424 85,774 76,324 66,368 55,687 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 397,049$ 399,925$ 397,174$ 398,799$ 399,674$ 396,424$ 395,774$ 396,324$ 396,368$ 395,687$ 2B Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2C Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Replacement 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - 2F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 235,000$ 250,000$ 260,000$ 275,000$ 290,000$ 300,000$ 310,000$ 320,000$ 330,000$ 340,000$ Interest 162,049 149,925 137,174 123,799 109,674 96,424 85,774 76,324 66,368 55,687 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 397,049$ 399,925$ 397,174$ 398,799$ 399,674$ 396,424$ 395,774$ 396,324$ 396,368$ 395,687$ 2G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Replacement 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 2H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 3 Series:2018 GO and Refunding Bonds 3A Total Bond 8,570,000$ Principal 885,000$ 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375$ 461,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3B Percent Water/WW Water 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Wastewater 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3C Water Debt Service Principal 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375$ 461,250$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 435,000$ 450,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest 33,375 11,250 - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 468,375 461,250 - - - - - - - - 3F Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 3G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 3H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - - - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 4 Series:2019 CO's 4A Total Bond 7,495,000$ Principal 1,730,000$ 145,000$ 155,000$ 160,000$ 165,000$ 170,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 185,000$ 195,000$ 200,000$ Interest 87,100 81,100 74,800 68,300 62,875 58,125 52,800 47,325 41,625 35,700 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 232,100$ 236,100$ 234,800$ 233,300$ 232,875$ 233,125$ 232,800$ 232,325$ 236,625$ 235,700$ 4B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4C Water Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050$ 118,050$ 117,400$ 116,650$ 116,438$ 116,563$ 116,400$ 116,163$ 118,313$ 117,850$ 4D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050 118,050 117,400 116,650 116,438 116,563 116,400 116,163 118,313 117,850 4F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050$ 118,050$ 117,400$ 116,650$ 116,438$ 116,563$ 116,400$ 116,163$ 118,313$ 117,850$ 4G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 4H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 72,500$ 77,500$ 80,000$ 82,500$ 85,000$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 100,000$ Interest 43,550 40,550 37,400 34,150 31,438 29,063 26,400 23,663 20,813 17,850 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 116,050 118,050 117,400 116,650 116,438 116,563 116,400 116,163 118,313 117,850 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 5 Series:2021 GO Refunding Bonds 5A Total Bond 6,015,000$ Principal 1,650,000$ 160,000$ 165,000$ 175,000$ 180,000$ 190,000$ 195,000$ 205,000$ 210,000$ 170,000$ -$ Interest 45,450 38,950 32,150 25,950 20,400 14,625 9,650 5,500 1,700 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 205,450$ 203,950$ 207,150$ 205,950$ 210,400$ 209,625$ 214,650$ 215,500$ 171,700$ -$ 5B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5C Water Debt Service Principal 80,000$ 82,500$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 95,000$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 105,000$ 85,000$ -$ Interest 22,725 19,475 16,075 12,975 10,200 7,313 4,825 2,750 850 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 102,725$ 101,975$ 103,575$ 102,975$ 105,200$ 104,813$ 107,325$ 107,750$ 85,850$ -$ 5D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0% Replacement 67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 26,400$ 27,225$ 28,875$ 29,700$ 31,350$ 32,175$ 33,825$ 34,650$ 28,050$ -$ Interest 7,499 6,427 5,305 4,282 3,366 2,413 1,592 908 281 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 33,899 33,652 34,180 33,982 34,716 34,588 35,417 35,558 28,331 - 5F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 80,000$ 82,500$ 87,500$ 90,000$ 95,000$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 105,000$ 85,000$ -$ Interest 22,725 19,475 16,075 12,975 10,200 7,313 4,825 2,750 850 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 102,725$ 101,975$ 103,575$ 102,975$ 105,200$ 104,813$ 107,325$ 107,750$ 85,850$ -$ 5G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0%33.0% Replacement 67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0%67.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 5H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 26,400$ 27,225$ 28,875$ 29,700$ 31,350$ 32,175$ 33,825$ 34,650$ 28,050$ -$ Interest 7,499 6,427 5,305 4,282 3,366 2,413 1,592 908 281 - Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 33,899 33,652 34,180 33,982 34,716 34,588 35,417 35,558 28,331 - Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 6 Series:2022 CO's 6A Total Bond 9,390,000$ Principal 2,095,000$ 165,000$ 175,000$ 185,000$ 195,000$ 205,000$ 215,000$ 225,000$ 235,000$ 245,000$ 250,000$ Interest 141,837 133,337 124,337 114,837 104,837 94,337 83,337 73,012 64,637 57,212 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 306,837$ 308,337$ 309,337$ 309,837$ 309,837$ 309,337$ 308,337$ 308,012$ 309,637$ 307,212$ 6B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6C Water Debt Service Principal 82,500$ 87,500$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 107,500$ 112,500$ 117,500$ 122,500$ 125,000$ Interest 70,919 66,669 62,169 57,419 52,419 47,169 41,669 36,506 32,319 28,606 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 153,419$ 154,169$ 154,669$ 154,919$ 154,919$ 154,669$ 154,169$ 154,006$ 154,819$ 153,606$ 6D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6% Replacement 57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 35,144$ 37,274$ 39,404$ 41,534$ 43,663$ 45,793$ 47,923$ 50,053$ 52,183$ 53,248$ Interest 30,210 28,400 26,483 24,459 22,329 20,093 17,750 15,551 13,767 12,186 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 65,354 65,673 65,886 65,993 65,993 65,886 65,673 65,604 65,950 65,434 6F Wastewater Debt Service Principal 82,500$ 87,500$ 92,500$ 97,500$ 102,500$ 107,500$ 112,500$ 117,500$ 122,500$ 125,000$ Interest 70,919 66,669 62,169 57,419 52,419 47,169 41,669 36,506 32,319 28,606 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 153,419$ 154,169$ 154,669$ 154,919$ 154,919$ 154,669$ 154,169$ 154,006$ 154,819$ 153,606$ 6G Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6%42.6% Replacement 57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4%57.4% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 35,144$ 37,274$ 39,404$ 41,534$ 43,663$ 45,793$ 47,923$ 50,053$ 52,183$ 53,248$ Interest 30,210 28,400 26,483 24,459 22,329 20,093 17,750 15,551 13,767 12,186 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 65,354 65,673 65,886 65,993 65,993 65,886 65,673 65,604 65,950 65,434 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 7 Series:2022A CO's 7A Total Bond 18,530,000$ Principal 4,365,000$ 345,000$ 365,000$ 380,000$ 400,000$ 420,000$ 445,000$ 465,000$ 490,000$ 515,000$ 540,000$ Interest 418,825 401,075 382,450 362,950 342,450 320,825 298,075 274,200 249,075 222,700 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 763,825$ 766,075$ 762,450$ 762,950$ 762,450$ 765,825$ 763,075$ 764,200$ 764,075$ 762,700$ 7B Percent Water/WW Water 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Wastewater 50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0%50.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 7C Water Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913$ 383,038$ 381,225$ 381,475$ 381,225$ 382,913$ 381,538$ 382,100$ 382,038$ 381,350$ 7D Water Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6E Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913 383,038 381,225 381,475 381,225 382,913 381,538 382,100 382,038 381,350 7E Wastewater Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913$ 383,038$ 381,225$ 381,475$ 381,225$ 382,913$ 381,538$ 382,100$ 382,038$ 381,350$ 7F Wastewater Allocation Percentages Growth 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Replacement 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% 6H Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 172,500$ 182,500$ 190,000$ 200,000$ 210,000$ 222,500$ 232,500$ 245,000$ 257,500$ 270,000$ Interest 209,413 200,538 191,225 181,475 171,225 160,413 149,038 137,100 124,538 111,350 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 381,913 383,038 381,225 381,475 381,225 382,913 381,538 382,100 382,038 381,350 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Current Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION 11 Series:Total Current Debt Service 11A Total Current Debt Service Principal 1,700,000$ 1,560,000$ 1,160,000$ 1,215,000$ 1,275,000$ 1,330,000$ 1,385,000$ 1,440,000$ 1,455,000$ 1,330,000$ Interest 891,410 815,637 750,911 695,836 640,236 584,336 529,636 476,361 423,405 371,299 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 2,591,410$ 2,375,637$ 1,910,911$ 1,910,836$ 1,915,236$ 1,914,336$ 1,914,636$ 1,916,361$ 1,878,405$ 1,701,299$ Water Total Debt Service Principal 1,057,500$ 880,000$ 450,000$ 470,000$ 492,500$ 515,000$ 537,500$ 560,000$ 562,500$ 495,000$ Interest 382,755 338,481 306,869 286,019 265,281 243,956 221,931 200,019 178,519 157,806 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,440,255$ 1,218,481$ 756,869$ 756,019$ 757,781$ 758,956$ 759,431$ 760,019$ 741,019$ 652,806$ Water Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 956,544$ 774,499$ 338,279$ 353,734$ 370,013$ 387,968$ 404,248$ 422,203$ 435,233$ 423,248$ Interest 326,821 287,164 260,413 244,366 228,358 211,981 194,780 177,221 159,398 141,386 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,283,365$ 1,061,663$ 598,691$ 598,100$ 598,371$ 599,950$ 599,028$ 599,424$ 594,631$ 564,634$ Wastewater Total Debt Service Principal 642,500$ 680,000$ 710,000$ 745,000$ 782,500$ 815,000$ 847,500$ 880,000$ 892,500$ 835,000$ Interest 508,655 477,156 444,043 409,818 374,955 340,380 307,705 276,343 244,887 213,493 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 1,151,155$ 1,157,156$ 1,154,043$ 1,154,818$ 1,157,455$ 1,155,380$ 1,155,205$ 1,156,343$ 1,137,387$ 1,048,493$ Wastewater Growth-Related Debt Service Principal 306,544$ 324,499$ 338,279$ 353,734$ 370,013$ 387,968$ 404,248$ 422,203$ 435,233$ 423,248$ Interest 290,672 275,914 260,413 244,366 228,358 211,981 194,780 177,221 159,398 141,386 Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total 597,216$ 600,413$ 598,691$ 598,100$ 598,371$ 599,950$ 599,028$ 599,424$ 594,631$ 564,634$ Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 WATER CIP NT-W1 Bubbling Springs 6" WL Replacement 27.0%73.0%763,000$ 206,010$ 556,990$ 254,333$ 254,333$ 254,333$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NT-W2 Corbett Pump Station and 3.0 MGD GST 0.0%100.0%8,600,000 - 8,600,000 2,866,667 2,866,667 2,866,667 - - - - - - - NT-W3 Ware - Seguin and Pump Station Operation Imp 0.0%100.0%175,000 - 175,000 58,333 58,333 58,333 - - - - - - - NT-W4 12" WL from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin 0.0%100.0%1,538,000 - 1,538,000 512,667 512,667 512,667 - - - - - - - NT-W5 Fred Couples to Schwab 0.0%100.0%455,556 - 455,556 151,852 151,852 151,852 - - - - - - - NT-W6 Schwab to Eckhardt 0.0%100.0%1,600,000 - 1,600,000 533,333 533,333 533,333 - - - - - - - NT-W7 Graytown to Pfeil 69.0%31.0%1,550,000 1,069,500 480,500 516,667 516,667 516,667 - - - - - - - NT-W8 FM 78 Water Line Replacement 22.0%78.0%875,000 192,500 682,500 291,667 291,667 291,667 - - - - - - - NT-W9 Moonlight Meadow Dr & Lost Meadow WL Replace 0.0%100.0%3,000,000 - 3,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 1,000,000 - - - - - - - NT-W10 Robinhood Way WL Replacement 0.0%100.0%4,650,000 - 4,650,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 1,550,000 - - - - - - - 2030-W1 12" WL from Tri-County Extension 100.0%0.0%4,788,000 4,788,000 - - - - 1,596,000 1,596,000 1,596,000 - - - - 2030-W2 Raf Burnette Rd 12" WL Imp 89.0%11.0%1,438,000 1,279,820 158,180 - - - 479,333 479,333 479,333 - - - - 2030-W3 8" WL from Ray Corbett DL to Lower Seguin 97.0%3.0%3,688,000 3,577,360 110,640 - - - 1,229,333 1,229,333 1,229,333 - - - - 2030-W4 Trainer Hale Rd 2" WL Replace & Imp 93.0%7.0%9,850,000 9,160,500 689,500 - - - 3,283,333 3,283,333 3,283,333 - - - - 2030-W5 Boenig Dr 6" WL Replace & Imp 69.0%31.0%6,388,000 4,407,720 1,980,280 - - - 2,129,333 2,129,333 2,129,333 - - - - 2030-W6 Live Oak to IH-35 24" Trans Main 100.0%0.0%32,075,000 32,075,000 - - - - 10,691,667 10,691,667 10,691,667 - - - - 2030-W7 Ware Seguin Pump Station Expansion I 33.0%67.0%5,213,000 1,720,290 3,492,710 - - - 1,737,667 1,737,667 1,737,667 - - - - 2030-W8 IH-10 8" WL Imp 100.0%0.0%6,063,000 6,063,000 - - - - 2,021,000 2,021,000 2,021,000 - - - - 2030-W9 PRV Installation for SW Pressure Plane 0.0%100.0%413,000 - 413,000 - - - 137,667 137,667 137,667 - - - - 2030-W10 River Rd WL Replace 58.0%42.0%2,325,000 1,348,500 976,500 - - - 775,000 775,000 775,000 - - - - 2030-W11 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W12 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W13 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W14 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W15 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - 2030-W16 Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 100.0%0.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Unfunded Water CIP 95,447,556 65,888,200 29,559,356 7,735,519 7,735,519 7,735,519 24,080,333 24,080,333 24,080,333 - - - - 69.0%31.0% 95,447,556 68,347,605 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 3,320,378$ 5,171,777$ 150,601$ 21,052,750$ 313,247$ 21,029,856$ 448,524$ 3,412,973$ 6,551,639$ 9,872,214$ Plus Interest 99,611 155,153 4,518 631,582 9,397 630,896 13,456 102,389 196,549 296,166 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ 2,934$ Annual LUEs 848 872 897 923 950 978 1,006 1,035 1,065 1,096 Total Impact Fees 2,487,306 2,559,189 2,633,150 2,709,248 2,787,545 2,868,105 2,950,993 3,036,277 3,124,026 3,214,310 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 5,907,295 7,886,119 2,788,269 24,393,580 3,110,190 24,528,857 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 7,000,000 - 26,000,000 - 42,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 12,907,295 7,886,119 28,788,269 24,393,580 45,110,190 24,528,857 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Less Capital Improvement Plan 95,447,556 65,888,200 29,559,356 7,735,519 7,735,519 7,735,519 24,080,333 24,080,333 24,080,333 - - - - Ending Balance 5,171,777 150,601 21,052,750 313,247 21,029,856 448,524 3,412,973 6,551,639 9,872,214 13,382,690 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION WASTEWATER CIP NT-S1 Town Creek Phase IV 24" Section 1 21.0%79.0%6,875,000$ 1,443,750$ 5,431,250$ 2,291,667$ 2,291,667$ 2,291,667$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ NT-S2 Town Creek Phase IV 12" Section 2 0.0%100.0%2,925,000 - 2,925,000 975,000 975,000 975,000 - - - - - - - NT-S3 Town Creek V 24"23.0%77.0%10,425,000 2,397,750 8,027,250 3,475,000 3,475,000 3,475,000 - - - - - - - NT-S4 Upsize Lookout Line 20.0%80.0%3,838,000 767,600 3,070,400 1,279,333 1,279,333 1,279,333 - - - - - - - NT-S5 Upsize Tri County Line 25.0%75.0%2,084,800 521,200 1,563,600 694,933 694,933 694,933 - - - - - - - NT-S6 Cibolo West Main 83.0%17.0%16,213,000 13,456,790 2,756,210 5,404,333 5,404,333 5,404,333 - - - - - - - NT-S7 Woman Hollering Creek Lift Station, Gravity Lines 89.0%11.0%13,000,000 11,570,000 1,430,000 4,333,333 4,333,333 4,333,333 - - - - - - - NT-SI-1 Decommission Tri County Lift Station 0.0%100.0%88,000 - 88,000 29,333 29,333 29,333 - - - - - - - NT-SI-2 Decommission Corbett Lift Station 0.0%100.0%1,500,000 - 1,500,000 500,000 500,000 500,000 - - - - - - - NT-SI-3 Decommission Sedona Lift Station 0.0%100.0%175,000 - 175,000 58,333 58,333 58,333 - - - - - - - 2030-S1 Hope Lane 8" Gravity Line 67.0%33.0%2,025,000 1,356,750 668,250 - - - 675,000 675,000 675,000 - - - - 2030-S2 Old Wiederstein Rd 8"5.0%95.0%1,338,000 66,900 1,271,100 - - - 446,000 446,000 446,000 - - - - 2030-S3 Union Pacific RR 8" - Sec 1 10.0%90.0%2,563,000 256,300 2,306,700 - - - 854,333 854,333 854,333 - - - - 2030-S4 Union Pacific RR 8" - Sec 2 12.0%88.0%400,000 48,000 352,000 - - - 133,333 133,333 133,333 - - - - 2030-S5 Wiederstein Rd -- 8"83.0%17.0%1,663,000 1,380,290 282,710 - - - 554,333 554,333 554,333 - - - - 2030-S6 Schaefer Rd 8" Sec 1 33.0%67.0%4,913,000 1,621,290 3,291,710 - - - 1,637,667 1,637,667 1,637,667 - - - - 2030-S7 Schaefer Rd 8" Sec 2 100.0%0.0%1,938,000 1,938,000 - - - - 646,000 646,000 646,000 - - - - 2030-S8 Aranda 8"100.0%0.0%475,000 475,000 - - - - 158,333 158,333 158,333 - - - - 2030-S9 Weir Rd 10"100.0%0.0%2,525,000 2,525,000 - - - - 841,667 841,667 841,667 - - - - 2030-S10 Trainer Hale Rd 10"100.0%0.0%1,038,000 1,038,000 - - - - 346,000 346,000 346,000 - - - - 2030-S11 Ware Seguin Rd 8"97.0%3.0%3,113,000 3,019,610 93,390 - - - 1,037,667 1,037,667 1,037,667 - - - - 2030-S12 FM 1518 8"40.0%60.0%400,000 160,000 240,000 - - - 133,333 133,333 133,333 - - - - 2030-S13 I-10 8" Section 1 99.0%1.0%2,713,000 2,685,870 27,130 - - - 904,333 904,333 904,333 - - - - 2030-S14 Boenig Drive 8"29.0%71.0%2,963,000 859,270 2,103,730 - - - 987,667 987,667 987,667 - - - - 2030-S15 N Greytown Rd 8"52.0%48.0%1,275,000 663,000 612,000 - - - 425,000 425,000 425,000 - - - - 2030-SI - 1 Friesenhahn West Line WW Upsize 22.0%78.0%8,175,000 1,798,500 6,376,500 - - - 2,725,000 2,725,000 2,725,000 - - - - 2030-SI - 2 Fairlawn WW Upsize 9.0%91.0%1,375,000 123,750 1,251,250 - - - 458,333 458,333 458,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 3 Cibolo Crossing WW Line Upsize 4.0%96.0%1,288,000 51,520 1,236,480 - - - 429,333 429,333 429,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 4 Woodland Oak Drive Replacement 4.0%96.0%338,000 13,520 324,480 - - - 112,667 112,667 112,667 - - - - 2030-SI - 5 Old Wiederstein WW Upsize 61.0%39.0%5,050,000 3,080,500 1,969,500 - - - 1,683,333 1,683,333 1,683,333 - - - - 2030-SI - 6 Northcliffe Lift Station Upgrade 5.0%95.0%7,838,000 391,900 7,446,100 - - - 2,612,667 2,612,667 2,612,667 - - - - 2030-SI - 7 Decommission Belmont Park Lift Station 0.0%100.0%463,000 - 463,000 - - - 154,333 154,333 154,333 - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Future Project 0.0%100.0%- - - - - - - - - - - - - Total Unfunded Wastewater CIP 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - 110,992,800 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 3,320,378$ 17,819,793$ 793,244$ 16,296,010$ 389,990$ 16,049,104$ 221,454$ 1,919,947$ 3,715,243$ 5,611,490$ Plus Interest 99,611 534,594 23,797 488,880 11,700 481,473 6,644 57,598 111,457 168,345 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ 1,668$ Annual LUEs 864 887 911 936 961 988 1,014 1,042 1,070 1,099 Total Impact Fees 1,441,071 1,480,124 1,520,235 1,561,433 1,603,748 1,647,210 1,691,849 1,737,698 1,784,790 1,833,158 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions from Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 4,861,060 19,834,511 2,337,276 18,346,323 2,005,438 18,177,787 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 32,000,000 - 33,000,000 - 32,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 36,861,060 19,834,511 35,337,276 18,346,323 34,005,438 18,177,787 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Less Capital Improvement Plan 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - Ending Balance 17,819,793 793,244 16,296,010 389,990 16,049,104 221,454 1,919,947 3,715,243 5,611,490 7,612,993 Date: 11/25/2024 2024 11 25 Schertz Debt Credit Model 2.0 Percent Percent Total CIP/Total Total 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Growth Replacement Project Growth Replacement 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- UNFUNDED Capital Improvement Plan Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Total CIP Total Water Unfunded CIP 95,447,556$ 65,888,200$ 29,559,356$ 7,735,519$ 7,735,519$ 7,735,519$ 24,080,333$ 24,080,333$ 24,080,333$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Wastewater Unfunded CIP 110,992,800 53,710,060 57,282,740 19,041,267 19,041,267 19,041,267 17,956,333 17,956,333 17,956,333 - - - - Total Unfunded CIP 206,440,356 119,598,260 86,842,096 26,776,785 26,776,785 26,776,785 42,036,667 42,036,667 42,036,667 - - - - Water and Sewer Fund 202 -- Financing Beginning Balance 6,640,756$ 22,991,570$ 943,845$ 37,348,760$ 703,237$ 37,078,961$ 669,978$ 5,332,920$ 10,266,883$ 15,483,704$ Plus Interest 199,223 689,747 28,315 1,120,463 21,097 1,112,369 20,099 159,988 308,006 464,511 Impact Fee Revenue Estimated Impact Fee NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Annual LUEs NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA Total Impact Fees 3,928,377 4,039,313 4,153,385 4,270,681 4,391,293 4,515,315 4,642,843 4,773,975 4,908,815 5,047,468 Plus Contributions from Developers - - - - - - - - - - Plus ARP - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Water Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Contributions from Sewer Impact Fees - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions form Water Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Conributions form Sewer Reserves - - - - - - - - - - Plus Amount Funded by W/WW Rate Revenue - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from EDC - - - - - - - - - - Plus Funded from TxDOT - - - - - - - - - - Sub-Total 10,768,355 27,720,630 5,125,545 42,739,904 5,115,627 42,706,644 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Plus Amount Funded by Long-Term Debt 39,000,000 - 59,000,000 - 74,000,000 - - - - - Total Funds Available 49,768,355 27,720,630 64,125,545 42,739,904 79,115,627 42,706,644 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Less Capital Improvement Plan 206,440,356 119,598,260 86,842,096 26,776,785 26,776,785 26,776,785 42,036,667 42,036,667 42,036,667 - - - - Ending Balance 22,991,570 943,845 37,348,760 703,237 37,078,961 669,978 5,332,920 10,266,883 15,483,704 20,995,683 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 Debt Financing Variables Issuing Cost Percentage 1.0% Initial Reserve Cost Percentage 2.0% Interest Rate 3.00% Term (Years)20 Annual Reserve Years Funded - Debt Issues Total Water 75,000,000$ 7,000,000$ -$ 26,000,000$ -$ 42,000,000$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater 97,000,000 32,000,000 - 33,000,000 - 32,000,000 - - - - - Total 172,000,000 39,000,000 - 59,000,000 - 74,000,000 - - - - - Percent Growth-Related 69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0%69.0% Growth-Related Debt Issues Water 51,773,091$ 4,832,155$ -$ 17,948,005$ -$ 28,992,931$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater 66,959,864 22,089,852 - 22,780,160 - 22,089,852 - - - - - Total 118,732,955 26,922,007 - 40,728,165 - 51,082,783 - - - - - CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2025 Principal 26,922,007$ -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 807,660 Total Debt 27,729,668 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 1,863,869 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Beginning Principal 27,729,668 26,697,688 25,634,750 24,539,923 23,412,251 22,250,750 21,054,403 19,822,166 18,552,962 Interest 831,890 800,931 769,042 736,198 702,368 667,522 631,632 594,665 556,589 Principal 1,031,979$ 1,062,939$ 1,094,827$ 1,127,672$ 1,161,502$ 1,196,347$ 1,232,237$ 1,269,204$ 1,307,280$ Interest 831,890 800,931 769,042 736,198 702,368 667,522 631,632 594,665 556,589 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ 1,863,869$ Percent Water/WW Water 17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9%17.9% Wastewater 82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1%82.1% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 185,227$ 190,784$ 196,507$ 202,403$ 208,475$ 214,729$ 221,171$ 227,806$ 234,640$ Interest 149,314 143,757 138,033 132,138 126,066 119,812 113,370 106,735 99,901 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ 334,541$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 846,752$ 872,155$ 898,319$ 925,269$ 953,027$ 981,618$ 1,011,066$ 1,041,398$ 1,072,640$ Interest 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 547,711 518,262 487,930 456,688 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - Total 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ Total Less Principal 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 547,711 518,262 487,930 456,688 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2026 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Beginning Principal - - - - - - - - Interest - - - - - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2027 Principal 40,728,165$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 1,221,845 Total Debt 41,950,010 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 2,819,700 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Beginning Principal 41,950,010 40,388,811 38,780,775 37,124,499 35,418,534 33,661,391 31,851,533 Interest 1,258,500 1,211,664 1,163,423 1,113,735 1,062,556 1,009,842 955,546 Principal 1,561,199$ 1,608,035$ 1,656,276$ 1,705,965$ 1,757,144$ 1,809,858$ 1,864,154$ Interest 1,258,500 1,211,664 1,163,423 1,113,735 1,062,556 1,009,842 955,546 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ 2,819,700$ Percent Water/WW Water 44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1%44.1% Wastewater 55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9%55.9% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 687,986$ 708,626$ 729,884$ 751,781$ 774,334$ 797,564$ 821,491$ Interest 554,593 533,954 512,695 490,798 468,245 445,015 421,088 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ 1,242,579$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 873,213$ 899,410$ 926,392$ 954,184$ 982,809$ 1,012,293$ 1,042,662$ Interest 703,907 677,711 650,728 622,937 594,311 564,827 534,458 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - Total 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ 1,577,120$ Total Less Principal 703,907 677,711 650,728 622,937 594,311 564,827 534,458 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2028 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 5 6 Beginning Principal - - - - - - Interest - - - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2029 Principal 51,082,783$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs 1,532,483 Total Debt 52,615,267 Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I 3,536,572 1 2 3 4 5 Beginning Principal 52,615,267 50,657,152 48,640,294 46,562,931 44,423,246 Interest 1,578,458 1,519,715 1,459,209 1,396,888 1,332,697 Principal 1,958,114$ 2,016,858$ 2,077,364$ 2,139,684$ 2,203,875$ Interest 1,578,458 1,519,715 1,459,209 1,396,888 1,332,697 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ 3,536,572$ Percent Water/WW Water 56.8%56.8%56.8%56.8%56.8% Wastewater 43.2%43.2%43.2%43.2%43.2% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal 1,111,362$ 1,144,703$ 1,179,044$ 1,214,415$ 1,250,848$ Interest 895,882 862,541 828,200 792,828 756,396 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ 2,007,244$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal 846,752$ 872,155$ 898,319$ 925,269$ 953,027$ Interest 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 Annual Reserve - - - - - Total 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ 1,529,329$ Total Less Principal 682,576 657,174 631,009 604,060 576,302 Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2030 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 4 Beginning Principal - - - - Interest - - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - - Annual Reserve - - - - Total -$ -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2031 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 3 Beginning Principal - - - Interest - - - Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ -$ Interest - - - Annual Reserve - - - Total -$ -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2032 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 2 Beginning Principal - - Interest - - Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0%0.0% Wastewater 100.0%100.0% Total 100.0%100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ -$ Interest - - Annual Reserve - - Total -$ -$ Total Less Principal - - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:2033 Principal -$ Issuing/Initial Reserve Costs - Total Debt - Interest Rate 3.0% Term 20 P&I - 1 Beginning Principal - Interest - Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Percent Water/WW Water 0.0% Wastewater 100.0% Total 100.0% Water Debt Service Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Wastewater Debt Service Principal -$ Interest - Annual Reserve - Total -$ Total Less Principal - Date: 11/25/2024 Input 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Area 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 Input Area -- Future Debt Service Scenario:2023 11 21 -- Scenario 1 CITY OF SCHERTZ WATER/WW IMPACT FEE UTILITY REVENUE CREDIT CALCULATION Series:Total Future Debt Service Water Future Debt Service Total Principal -$ 185,227$ 190,784$ 884,493$ 911,028$ 2,049,721$ 2,111,213$ 2,174,549$ 2,239,786$ 2,306,979$ Interest - 149,314 143,757 692,627 666,092 1,534,643 1,473,151 1,409,814 1,344,578 1,277,384 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 334,541 334,541 1,577,120 1,577,120 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 3,584,364 Wastewater Future Debt Service Total Principal -$ 846,752$ 872,155$ 1,771,533$ 1,824,679$ 2,726,171$ 2,807,956$ 2,892,195$ 2,978,961$ 3,068,330$ Interest - 682,576 657,174 1,334,916 1,281,770 1,909,606 1,827,821 1,743,582 1,656,817 1,567,448 Annual Reserve - - - - - - - - - - Total - 1,529,329 1,529,329 3,106,449 3,106,449 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 4,635,777 APPENDIX 33 - IMPACT FEE COMPARISON SOURCES CITY OF BOERNE - 2023 NEW BRAUNFELS UTILITIES - 2022 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report New Braunfels Utilities ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In 2021, New Braunfels Utilities (NBU), authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis on the water and wastewater systems. The purpose of this report is to summarize the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and wastewater impact fees for NBU. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the update of water and wastewater impact fees. As part of this study, land use assumptions, growth projections, and water/wastewater loading criteria from the 2021 Water & Wastewater Master Plan Update by FNI were used to develop 10-year load projections for both the water and wastewater systems. Impact fee capital improvements plans (CIP) were developed for both systems to serve projected growth through 2032. The hydraulic models of the water and wastewater systems, along with pumping and storage planning criteria developed by FNI, were employed to calculate the percentage of each project’s capacity projected to be utilized in the 10-year planning period (2022-2032). A summation of each project’s estimated cost, including financing costs less credits for existing projects partially funded through rate increases, multiplied by the percentage of that project being utilized in the 10-year planning period was used to calculate a total impact fee eligible CIP cost for both water and wastewater. These costs were divided by the projected growth in living unit equivalents (LUE) for water and wastewater, respectively, to determine the maximum allowable impact fees. Table ES-1 and Table ES-2 summarize the maximum allowable impact fee calculations for water and wastewater, respectively. Table ES-3 shows the maximum allowable impact fee for each meter size distributed by NBU. Table ES-1 Maximum Water Impact Fee Calculation Water Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $228,540,978 Total Eligible Financing Costs $168,389,936 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $396,930,914 Total Impact Fee Credits ($837,433) Maximum Allowable Cost $396,093,481 Growth in Service Units 20,367 Maximum Allowable Water Impact Fee $19,448 Water & Wastewater Impact Fee Update Report New Braunfels Utilities ES-2 Table ES-2 Maximum Wastewater Impact Fee Calculation Wastewater Impact Fee Total Eligible Capital Improvement Costs $85,710,012 Total Eligible Financing Costs $37,415,837 Total Eligible Impact Fee Costs $123,125,849 Total Impact Fee Credits ($2,813,220) Maximum Allowable Cost $120,312,629 Growth in Service Units 19,269 Maximum Allowable Wastewater Impact Fee $6,244 Table ES-3 Maximum Allowable Impact Fee by Meter Size Meter Size Maximum Flow Rate for Continuous Duty (gallons per minute) Service Unit Equivalent Maximum Allowable Water Maximum Allowable Wastewater Maximum Allowable Total 5/8" 10 1.0 $19,448 $6,244 $25,692 1" 25 2.5 $48,620 $15,610 $64,230 1 1/2" 50 5.0 $97,240 $31,220 $128,460 2" 80 8.0 $155,584 $49,952 $205,536 3" 175 17.5 $340,340 $109,270 $449,610 4" 300 30.0 $583,440 $187,320 $770,760 6" 675 67.5 $1,312,740 $421,470 $1,734,210 8" 2,400 240.0 $4,667,520 $1,498,560 $6,166,080 10" 3,500 350.0 $6,806,800 $2,185,400 $8,992,200 CITY OF SEGUIN - 2023 Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 Background In August 2022, the City of Seguin, Texas (City), authorized Freese and Nichols, Inc. (FNI) to perform an impact fee analysis on the City’s water and wastewater systems, including a portion of the Spring Hills Water Supply Corporation (SHWSC) Service Area that will be transferred to the City as part of the ongoing Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN) Transfer. The purpose of this report is to summarize the methodology used in the development and calculation of water and wastewater impact fees for the City of Seguin. The methodology used herein satisfies the requirements of the Texas Local Government Code Section 395 for the establishment and update of water and wastewater impact fees. 2.0 Land Use Assumptions Population and land use are important elements in the analysis of water and wastewater systems. Through collaboration between FNI and the City, FNI developed growth projections using land use assumptions from the ongoing Seguin Comprehensive Plan and proposed development according to the City’s Planning Department to estimate service connections for the 2023 and 2033 planning periods. Table ES-1 presents the growth projections for the City of Seguin Water and Wastewater Service Areas including the CCN area to be transferred from SHWSC to the City, hereafter referred to as the “Transfer Area.” Table ES-1: Growth Projections Service Area 2023 Connections 2033 Connections Growth Rate Existing Water 8,272 11,012 2.90% Transfer Area 1,305 7,370 18.90% Water Total 9,577 18,382 6.74% Wastewater Total 10,741 28,319 10.18% 3.0 Capital Improvement Plan Water and wastewater impact fee capital improvement plans (CIP) were developed for the City of Seguin based on the land use assumptions and growth projections. The recommended improvements will provide the required capacity to meet projected water demands and wastewater flows through 2033. The CIPs are based on recommendations from the 2022 Water and Wastewater Master Plans and include improvements identified to provide service to the Transfer Area. For each existing or proposed project, the impact fee eligible cost is calculated as a percentage of the project cost, based upon the portion of Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-2 the project’s capacity required to serve growth projected to occur between 2023 and 2033, the 10-year period used for impact fee analysis. The cost associated with the portion of projects required to serve growth beyond this 10-year period are not included in the current impact fee calculations but will be eligible for impact fee cost recovery in the next impact fee update. The total cost for each eligible project includes the project’s capital cost to serve 10-year growth, the projected finance cost for the capital improvements, and the consultant cost for preparing and updating the CIP. Table ES-2 shows a summary of the total capital cost and impact fee-eligible cost for all Impact Fee CIP projects for the Water and Wastewater Service Areas. Table ES-2: CIP Cost Summary Service Area Total Capital Cost of Impact Fee Eligible Projects Total 10-Year (2023-2032) Cost of Impact Fee Eligible Projects Water $173,881,062 $87,766,441 Wastewater $339,567,626 $194,769,279 4.0 Impact Fee Analysis According to Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code, the maximum impact fee may not exceed the amount determined by dividing the cost of required capital improvements by the total number of service units attributed to new development during the impact fee eligibility period. A water service unit is defined as the service equivalent to a water-only connection or a water/wastewater connection for a single-family residence. A wastewater service unit is defined as the service unit equivalent to a water/wastewater connection for a single-family residence. The current impact fee ordinance was adopted in 2020. This ordinance set the water impact fee for a single-family meter at $1,386.86 including a pass-through fee of $354.54 from Schertz-Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) and the wastewater impact fee for a single-family meter at $7,757.77. This project is an update to the 2020 ordinance. Table ES-3 displays the updated maximum allowable impact fee per service unit for the Water and Wastewater Service Areas, including the $354.54 SSLGC pass-through fee. Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Update City of Seguin ES-3 Table ES-3: Maximum Allowable Impact Fees Service Area Maximum Allowable Impact Fee Per Service Unit Water $7,308 Wastewater $9,250 Sub-Total $16,558 SSLGC Water Supply Impact Fee $354 Total Maximum Allowable Impact Fee $16,912 CITY OF SAN MARCOS - 2018 2018 Update of the Water and Wastewater Impact Fees for the City of San Marcos Table 8. Derivation of Alternative Maximum Water and Wastewater Impact Fee Amounts Capital Cost Optional Adjustments Highest of Option A Option B of New Service Rate 50%Cost Option A Item per LUE Credit Adjustment Option A Option B or B WATER Supply 2,495 $ 208 $ 1,247 $ 2,287 $ 1,247 Treatment 609 10 305 599 305 Pumping 128 18 64 110 64 Ground Storage 298 1 149 297 149 Elevated Storage 163 8 82 155 82 Transmission 455 113 228 342 228 Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost 10 10 10 Total Water 4,159 358 2,074 3,801 $2,085 $3,801 WASTEWATER Treatment 1,470 86 $ 735 $ 1,385 $ 735 Pumping 705 78 352 627 352 Interceptors 774 112 387 662 387 Allocated Impact Fee Study Cost 10 10 10 Total Wastewater 2,960 276 1,475 2,684 $1,485 $2,684 TOTAL WATER/WASTEWATER 7,119 634 3.549 6,485 $3,570 $6,485 The fee methodology was replicated for each major facility type in the utility system e.g., supply,treatment, pumping, elevated storage, ground storage, and transmission) so that the total fee amount is the sum of the component facility fees. This provides a basis for extending the fee to wholesale customers of the City or granting fee offsets if a developer cost-participates with the City on CIP projects. For comparison purposes, the current impact fees of other near-by cities are listed in Table 9. City of San Marcos 15 1.)January 2018 CITY OF AUSTIN - 2023 SAWS - 2024 2800 U.S. Hwy. 281 North • P.O. Box 2449 • San Antonio, TX • 78298-2449 • www.saws.org March 18, 2024 TO INTERESTED PARTIES: Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395 necessitates the updating of the San Antonio Water System (SAWS) impact fees by June 2024. The Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC), SAWS staff, and consultant Carollo Engineers began the update process for all water and wastewater impact fees in July 2023, and the CIAC finalized its recommendations in a findings report on January 31, 2024. The findings report and all other CIAC meeting documents are available at: www.saws.org/CIAC . The update involves a projection of increased demand and resulting increased capacity in the water and wastewater systems for the next ten-year planning period. The costs associated with the capacity necessary to serve the projected growth determine the impact fee rate. The CIAC recommended impact fees are show below. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED IMPACT FEES 2800 U.S. Hwy. 281 North • P.O. Box 2449 • San Antonio, TX • 78298-2449 • www.saws.org The recommended impact fees were approved by the SAWS Board of Trustees on March 5, 2024. It is anticipated that the San Antonio City Council will hold a public hearing and consider adoption of the recommended impact fees on May 16, 2024. When the recommended impact fees are approved by the San Antonio City Council, they are expected to become effective on June 1, 2024. The determination on whether current impact fees or the recommended impact fees will be charged for service to a particular property is based on the date of plat recordation. In accordance with current state law, the impact fees in effect at the time the plat is recorded are the fees that will be charged. An individual may pay current impact fees for a property prior to plat recordation under the following conditions: • The plat has been approved by the Planning Commission, • All impact fees are paid prior to the effective date of the new impact fees. If you have any questions concerning the update process, please do not hesitate to contact me at tlehmann@saws.org, 210-233-3492, or Bob Johnson at bobby.johnson@saws.org, 210-233-3493. Sincerely, Tracey B. Lehmann, P.E. Interim Vice President Engineering and Construction CITY OF PFLUGERVILLE - 2023 Agenda No. 12.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Resolution 25-R-005 - Approving a Utility Service Extension Request for the Woman Hollering Townhomes (B.James/K.Woodlee) BACKGROUND When a property within the City Limits of the City of Schertz is proposed for development and is within the City's area of Certificate of Convenience and Necessity (CCN), the connection to the City's water and/or wastewater utilities is reviewed and processed through established procedures of the platting process.  In the past, when a property outside the City Limits was proposed for development and there was a need for City water and/or wastewater service, it was required that the property be annexed into the City.  Subsequent to annexation, the platting process would take place.  The City cannnot require annexation as a condition to provide utility services to a property within its CCN. As a result the UDC was amended via Ordinance 24-S-14 to instead require that the developer submit a request for Utility Service Extension.  According to the UDC, authority to approve the request lies with City Council.  Once approved, the developer may submit for permits to construct the necessary improvements in order to be served by the City's utility infrastructure. The proposed development is approximately 30.48 acres situated along FM 1518 on the north side of its intersection with Woman Hollering Road (12535 Woman Hollering Road).  The developer proposes to construct a multifamily or townhome development with up to 230 living unit equivalents (LUEs) and desires to connect to public water and wastewater systems.  Staff has evaluated the request based on existing water and wastewater facilities, flows expected to be generated by the proposed development, and the projection of other future flows from the vicinity.  Adequate capacity in both the water distribution system and the wastewater collection system currently exists to serve the development.  The following criteria should be considered for final action determination. 1.  Whether the proposed development to be served by the extension is consistent with the Comprehensive Land Plan.  The property lies within areas designated as Complete Neighborhood and Local Corridor.  A mixture of housing types and multifamily developments are identified as appropriate in those areas.  2.  Whether the extension is proposed to be constructed in accordance with all applicable City ordinances, resolutions, regulations, and standards.  The utility extensions and connections will be constructed in accordance with applicable City standards.  3.  Whether it is feasible to annex the property, and any intervening property which is needed for utility rights-of-way, into the City.  If requested by the property owner, the property could be annexed into the City.  No additional rights-of-way across the property are currently identified as being needed.  It is also of note that the property owner proposes to enter into an agreement for annexation after certain milestones occur.  4.  Whether the utility extension would compromise the City's ability to timely provide adequate water or wastewater facilities to property inside the City.  The proposed extensions are not expected to compromise the City's ability to provide timely and adequate water or wastewater facilities to property inside the City Limits.  5.  Whether the utility extension will lead to premature development that cannot be served efficiently and timely by roadway, drainage, or park facilities.  The proposed extensions will not lead to premature development that cannot be served by existing roadway, drainage, or park facilities.  6.  Whether the utility extension is financially feasible given the proposed means of financing the extension.  The proposed extensions will be paid for by the developer.  7.  Whether the utility extension will lead to significant degradation of water quality or other environmental resources, either from construction of the water or wastewater improvements, development of the property owner's land, or development of other land that may be served through the extended facilities.  The proposed extensions are not expected to lead to significant degradation of environmental resources.  8.  Whether the property owner proposes to extend wastewater facilities without utilizing City water facilities.  The property owner proposes to extend and be served by both City wastewater and City water facilities.  9.  The extent to which the proposed agreement promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City and the safe, orderly, efficient and healthful development of the City.  By following City standards and extending utilities to provide for future extension beyond the proposed development, the extensions and proposed development of the property will allow for orderly development and is not expected to jeopardize the safe, efficient, and healthful development of the City.  A development agreement is also being proposed to include annexation of the property after certain milestones of development have been met.   In conjunction with this item, staff has worked with the property owner on a Development Agreement, Resolution 25-R-021. GOAL The goal of the resolution is the approval of the water and wastewater Utility Extension Request for the proposed development known as the Woman Hollering Townhomes. COMMUNITY BENEFIT By allowing the extension of public utilities to the proposed Woman Hollering Townhome development, a short extension of the sanitary sewer main will be constructed to provide a connection point for several parcels within the City's CCN and the City Limits.  Also, without approval of the service extension request, the property might still be developed, although at a lower density but with on-site septic facilities which are not desirable if public facilities are nearby and accessible.  The property owner has also agreed to be annexed into the City Limits once certain development steps are completed. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Staff recommends that Council approve the request for Utility Service Extension for City of Schertz Public Water and Wastewater infrastructure to the proposed Woman Hollering Townhomes project along with the proposed development agreement with the property owner. RECOMMENDATION Approve Resolution 25-R-005. Attachments Resolution 25-R-005  Vicinity Map  Utility Service Extension Request  RESOLUTION NO. 25-R-005 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, APPROVING A UTILITY SERVICE EXTENSION REQUEST FOR WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES TO THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE WOMAN HOLLERING TOWNHOMES WHEREAS, the City of Schertz (the “City”) provides retail water and wastewater service under Certificates of Convenience and Necessity (CCNs) issued by the Public Utility Commission of Texas (PUC) to certain areas in Bexar County; and WHEREAS, the property on the north side of the intersection of Woman Hollering Road and FM 1518 is outside the City Limits of the City but within the City’s water and wastewater CCNs; and WHEREAS, the developer of the property on the north side of the intersection of Woman Hollering Road and FM 1518 (12535 Woman Hollering Road) proposes a project known as the Woman Hollering Townhomes and has submitted a Utility Service Extension Request to be served by City water and wastewater without being annexed into the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the criteria for approval of the Utility Service Extension Request as set forth in Unified Development Code (UDC) Section 21.4.11 are being met. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1.The City Council hereby approves the Utility Service Extension Request for the project known as the Woman Hollering Townhomes thereby allowing the submittal of applications for, construction of, and connection to City water and wastewater utilities for up to 230 living unit equivalents (LUEs). Section 2.The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3.All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4.This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5.If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6.It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7.This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND ADOPTED, this __ day of _________________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (CITY SEAL) 5113 Southwest Parkway, Suite 260, Austin, Texas 78735 T: 512.899.0601 Firm Registration No. F-786 www.malonewheeler.com May 21st, 2024 City of Schertz Attn: Kathryn Woodlee City Engineer 11 Commercial Place Schertz, TX 78154 Re: Woman Hollering Townhomes – Service Extension Request (SER) Ms. Woodlee, The Woman Hollering project is located in a 30.48-acre tract at 12535 Woman Hollering Road, in the Extraterritorial Jurisdiction of the City of Schertz, Texas. The property is located west of FM 1518 and north of Woman Hollering Road, a private roadway owned by a third-party individual in the Tom Williams subdivision. The subject tract used to have an existing single-family home that was recently demolished. The property is currently vacant/undeveloped and is proposed to be developed with up to 230 residential units, which could be townhomes or apartments with a proposed clubhouse, which would equal but not exceed 230 LUEs. No subdivision of the land is being proposed; the City of Schertz issued a “Certificate of Determination” in March 13, 2023 acknowledging that the City will not require platting given that the property is located in the ETJ. This letter is being submitted to serve as the Service Extension Request (SER) for water (domestic, irrigation and fire flow) and wastewater services for this project. Per previous discussions with City staff, no water line extension will be required along Woman Hollering Road, a private dead-end road, where an existing 4” water line is already in place serving the properties in the cul-de-sac, and where no additional development is feasible due to the nature of the lot and street layout. A water meter is proposed to connect to the existing City of Schertz 12” water line on the west side of FM 1518 to serve the proposed Woman Hollering development; the proposed water meter size will be determined with site plan design when fixture unit counts become available. For wastewater service, an 8” wastewater line is proposed to be extended along the property’s frontage on the west side of FM 1518 and connect to the existing City of Schertz wastewater system on the east side of FM 1518. Per the wastewater analysis performed, the proposed 8” line will have adequate capacity to handle the 230 LUEs and estimated I&I (16,100 gpd) for the Woman Hollering development. An exhibit showing the proposed wastewater line extension and water meter is included with this submittal. A “Will Serve Letter” was issued by the City of Schertz on December 6th, 2022, confirming the City’s availability to provide water and wastewater services for the Woman Hollering project. This SER is being submitted as the next step in the development process to show the proposed public improvements and confirm that water and wastewater capacity will be reserved in the City’s public utility systems for the requested 230 LUEs that are anticipated for the project. Should there be any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me via email at claudiam@malonewheeler.com or by phone at 512-618-0437. Thank you for your efforts on this project. Firm Registration No. F-786 www.malonewheeler.com Sincerely, Malone Wheeler, Inc. Claudia Morlotti, E.I.T. Assistant Project Manager Agenda No. 13.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Planning & Community Development Subject: Ordinance 25-S-004 - Consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs (B.James/L.Wood/E.Delgado) BACKGROUND Background from January 7, 2025 City Council meeting: At the January 7, 2025 City Council meeting staff gave a presentation and made a recommendation on Unified Development Code Amendments for Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs to explicitly state that wind driven signs including feather flags and inflatable / balloon signs are prohibited regardless of size. Staff also recommended amending Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs to increase the maximum area and maximum height for temporary signage to 36 square feet and 6 feet in height on all types of streets. However, during the discussion, City Council indicated that the proposed amendment language was not desired as written. The explicit prohibition of wind driven signs to include feather flags was not the previous intention. During the January 7th discussion, City Council confirmed the desire to prohibit inflatable / balloon signs, but there was a desire to allow feather flags in some capacity. Based on the discussion, City Council ultimately tabled the item in order for staff to provide changes to the proposed UDC amendment language. City staff has created an updated draft UDC Amendment language outlined below that will be discussed at the February 4, 2025 meeting in order to have City Council evaluate and modify. From that discussion, staff will finalize the UDC Amendment for action.  Proposed Amendments Staff is proposing modifications to the following UDC Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and UDC Article 11, Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs based on the discussion had at the January 7th City Council meeting:     Article UDC Section Current UDC Proposed Amendment 11 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs Currently, the UDC does not directly prohibit inflatable / balloon signs.  Balloon Signs including inflatable signs are prohibited regardless of size.  Feather Flags are the only type of wind driven signs allowed. 11 21.11.17.B Maximum Area Areas with Limited Access:  32 sq.ft. per face or ten percent (10%) of the building facade, whichever is less  Areas with Unlimited Access:  Twenty Four Square Feet (24 sq.ft.) except that feather flags are limited to Sixteen Square Feet (16 sq.ft.) 24 sq.ft. per face or seven percent (7%) of the building facade, whichever is less  All Other Streets:  16 sq.ft. per face or five percent (5%) of the building facade, whichever is less 11 21.11.17.C Maximum Height Areas with Limited Access: 6 feet Areas with Unlimited Access: 4 feet  All Other Streets: 3 feet Four Feet (4ft.) except that feather flags are limited to Eight Feet (8') Staff is proposing to treat feather flags as temporary signs. Feather flags are the only type of wind driven sign allowed. Feather flags can be four feet taller (8' vs 4') but have less area (16 sq ft vs 24 sq ft). Each business/tenant can have no more than 3 temporary signs up at one time (can be all feather flags or freestanding or a combination 2 of one and 1 of the other). The total number of days they can have temporary signs up is 120 and that is cumulative. So they can have one sign up for 120 days or 3 signs up for 40 days or some combination of that. Temporary signs will be issued for 30 day increments, except that it can be shortened if they hit their maximum time. For example, they can have 3 temporary signs up for 30 days and then one sign up for 30 days. We will also issue a "recurring event permit" that is issued in two day increments for up to 15 times per year. The applicant must identify which 15 two day increments they want when applying for the initial permit (these can be adjusted as dates change).  In summary businesses would be able to have feather flags, but not inflatable signs. They can have up to 3 temporary signs up at any one time, but they can only have 120 instances of temporary signs. There is also the provision for short recurring event temporary signs. The idea is to create a consistent framework to limit complexity and confusion. Staff is requesting that at the February 4th City Council meeting that feedback and direction can be provided if this proposal or some variation of it is desirable.  Additionally, in light of the extensive conversation on temporary signs and feedback received, staff has started drafting a full UDC Article 11 Signs rewrite. The goal of this rewrite will be to have sign regulations that are more easily understood, and to ensure that the signs that are being permitted are desired by City Council. In light of this upcoming UDC Amendment for Article 11, which staff anticipates having to the City Council in April, staff is requesting that no formal action be taken on Ordinance 25-S-004. Rather than adopting a small change in Article 11 and then in the upcoming couple of months making a full Article 11 rewrite, it seems more appropriate to provide direction on Temporary Signs using this ordinance presentation, not take action on the Ordinance itself and then the desired changes for Temporary Signs will be incorporated into the overall Article 11 rewrite.  Previous Background from the January 7, 2025 City Council meeting: As per Unified Development Code Section 21.4.7, City Council from time to time, or on its own motion, or at the recommendation of City Staff can recommend amendments, change or modify any portion of the UDC to establish and maintain sound and stable development. At the November 12, 2024, City Council Workshop Meeting, the Planning Division gave a presentation / workshop regarding updating the Ordinance for blowup signs and flags for advertising. As a follow-up, the Planning Division gave an additional workshop / presentation at the November 19, 2024, City Council meeting to discuss proposed amendments to UDC Article 11, Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs. Both of these workshops / discussions can be reviewed via YouTube. Based on these two workshops, it was discussed that the current regulations for temporary signs should be modified to increase the maximum height and maximum area in order to allow greater flexibility (larger signage regardless of the property location and adjacent roadway classification) for businesses / customers to utilize temporary signs. In addition, the Unified Development Code should explicitly prohibit wind driven signs such as feather flag signs and inflatable signs.  The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and made a recommendation of approval at the December 4, 2024, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. A Public Hearing notice was published in the San Antonio Express on December 18th for the Public Hearing at the January 7, 2025, City Council meeting.    GOAL To receive direction on the proposed amendments to the Unified Development Code Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs to explicitly state that inflatable / balloon signs are prohibited regardless of size and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs to increase the maximum area and maximum height for temporary signage and to modify the requirements for feather flags.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When staff evaluates Unified Development Code Amendments, they use section 21.4.7.D Criteria for approval. The criteria are listed below. 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; The City Council requests and staff proposes UDC amendments from time to time to proactively better the Unified Development Code that governs development within the City of Schertz. The proposed amendments allow greater flexibility / larger temporary signs regardless of where the business location is and the associated roadway classification. By increasing the maximum height and maximum area for temporary signage it promotes orderly and efficient development. With the proposed amendments, businesses will still be required to obtain a temporary sign permit which also ensures orderly development of the City. Additionally, by providing clarity on prohibited signs it will ensure consistency and efficiency with the sign permitting process throughout the City. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the UDC and the City; The proposed amendments are consistent with the goals and desires of the City Council as discussed at the November 19, 2024 City Council workshop. Additionally, increasing the maximum height and maximum area allows greater flexibility, which is consistent with other UDC Amendments that have been approved. Recent UDC amendments have been made to add clarity on requirements and desires of the City Council. By creating a UDC amendment that clearly prohibits inflatable signage, it is more clear for business owners and applicants on what is allowed as a temporary sign in the City of Schertz.  3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law; and The proposed amendments will meet the changing conditions / desires of the City Council in relation to allowing larger temporary signs. Additionally, the amendment adds clarity on temporary signs that are not desired and more clearly prohibits the use of inflatable signs. The Operational Values of the City include being proactive and service-oriented. By implementing the proposed UDC amendment, it will proactively allow businesses to have larger temporary signs and to have consistent height and area maximums for all businesses regardless of the property location.  4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed Unified Development Code Amendments. The City Council Workshops at the November 12th and November 19th City Council, as well as the January 7, 2025 City Council meetings should be reviewed as it provides additional information as to the insight of why these UDC Amendments have been requested and proposed.  RECOMMENDATION Staff Recommendation As previously stated in this City Council report staff is requesting that at the February 4th City Council meeting that feedback and direction be provided about whether the proposed changes are desirable. Staff is requesting that no formal action be taken on Ordinance 25-S-004 but rather include these changes into the full rewrite of Article 11 that will be brought to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in the next couple of months.   Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation The Planning and Zoning Commission met on December 4, 2024, held a public hearing, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 6-0 vote. The UDC Amendment that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended included the following UDC Amendment language which differs from what is proposed with this UDC Amendment.   Prohibit wind driven signs including feather flags and inflatable / balloon signs Increase maximum area to 36 square feet Increase maximum height to 6 feet Attachments Ordinance 25-S-004 with Attachments  Proposed UDC Amendment Redlines  City Council Presentation Slides  ORDINANCE NO. 25-S-004 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING PART III SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, THE UNIFIED DEVELOPMENT CODE (UDC) ARTICLE 11 SECTION 21.11.6 PROHIBITED SIGNS AND ARTICLE 11 SECTION 21.11.17 TEMPORARY SIGNS WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 10-S-06, the City of Schertz (the “City”) adopted and Amended and Restated the Unified Development Code on April 13, 2010, as further amended (the “Current UDC”); and WHEREAS, City Staff has reviewed the Current UDC and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, the Current UDC; and WHEREAS, on December 4, 2024, the Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a public hearing and, after considering the Criteria, made a recommendation to City Council of approval; and WHEREAS, on January 7, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the Criteria and recommendation by the Planning and Zoning Commission, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and are in the interest of the public safety, health, and welfare. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The Current UDC is hereby amended as set forth on Exhibit A hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the mat ters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED ON this _____ of __________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (city seal) Exhibit “A” Proposed Unified Development Code (UDC) Amendments Sec. 21.11.6. Prohibited Signs. A. Obscene Signs. No person shall erect or display on any site a sign in which the dominant theme of material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex, and is patently offensive because it affronts current community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters, and is utterly without redeeming social literary, artistic, political, and scientific value, according to contemporary community standards. B. Obstructing Doors, Windows or Fire Escapes. No person shall erect or display on any site any sign that prevents free ingress to or egress from any door, window or fire escape. C. Obstructing Vision/Sight Triangle. No person shall erect or display on any site any sign in such a manner as to obstruct free and clear vision of moving vehicles at any location, street intersection, or driveway. All signs placed at any intersection shall prevent such problem by observing a visibility triangle (see definition of visibility triangle). D. Interference With Traffic. No sign shall be permitted which interferes with vehicular or pedestrian traffic as a result of the position, size, shape, movement, color, fashion, manner, or intensity of illumination, or any other characteristics causing such interference. No person shall erect or allow to be displayed any sign in such a manner as to interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device, including, signs making use of the words "stop", "go", "look", "slow", "danger", or any other similar word, phrase, symbol or character. No person shall employ any red, yellow, green, or other colored lamp or light in such a manner as to cause confusion or otherwise interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. E. Over Public Property or Public Right-of-Way. It shall be prohibited to erect or display any type of sign on or over public ROW or other public property, unless the same is erected by the City, County, State or other authorized governmental agency, or with the permission of the City (in its sole disc retion), for public purposes. F. Signs on Utility Poles. No person shall erect or display any sign except as specifically authorized by section 21.11.5 on any utility pole located upon any public right -of-way or utility easement. G. Private Property. No sign shall be located on private property without the consent of the owner of the premises, including signs located on trees, light poles or mail boxes. H. Dilapidated Signs. No sign shall be permitted which is deteriorated, dilapidated or in danger of falling or otherwise unsafe. I. Signs in Violation. No sign shall be permitted that does not comply with any applicable provisions of the building code, this UDC, or any other applicable laws, ordinances, codes or regulations of the City. J. Home Occupation Signs. No exterior home occupation signs shall be permitted unless otherwise specifically authorized in another applicable section of this UDC. K. Non-Motorized or Portable Signs. No trailer type, non-motorized signs using wheels and axles as the primary support shall be permitted. L. Off Premise Signs. Except as set forth elsewhere in this Article, all off premise signs not legally existing on February 19, 2008 are prohibited except that the following signs may be permitted provided they otherwise meet the applicable requirements of this Article: 1. Community Service Signs; 2. Garage Sale Signs; 3. Official Government Signs; 4. Historical Markers and Plaques; Exhibit "A" Proposed UDC Amendments 5. Political Signs; 6. Real Estate Signs; 7. Temporary Signs; 8. Traffic Signs; M. Bandit Signs. N. Painted Signs. No sign shall be permitted which is painted on the wall of any building or on any part of a building. O. Other Signs. Except as set forth elsewhere in this Article, any signs not specifically permitted by this Article are prohibited within the City and its ETJ. P. Balloon Signs including inflatable signs are prohibited regardless of size. Feather Flags are the only type of wind driven signs allowed. Sec. 21.11.17. Temporary Signs. A. General. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article, this section shall be applicable to all temporary signs identified in this Article. B. Maximum Area. The maximum area permitted for temporary signs shall not exceed Twenty-Four Square Feet (24 sq.ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Sixteen Square Feet (16 sq.ft.). C. Maximum Height. The maximum height permitted for temporary signs shall not exceed Four Feet (4ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Eight Feet (8’). D. Minimum Setback. The minimum setback for all temporary signs shall be fifteen feet (15') from any property line. E. Time Limitations. Temporary signs shall be permitted for a maximum of 120 days per calendar year. Temporary Sign permits will be issued for thirty (30) day increments . The cumulative total number of days for which all temporary sign issued for a property or business shall not exceed 120 calendar days. F. Number of Signs. No more than three (3) temporary signs shall be permitted per business or tenant at any given time. G. Recurring Event Permit. A Recurring Event Permit is for temporary signs that will be issued in two-day increments for up to fifteen (15) times per year. The applicant requesting a Recurring Event Permit must identify which 15 two day increments they intend to have the temporary signs when applying for the initial permit. The selected dates can be modified as dates change with prior approval. Exhibit "A" Proposed UDC Amendments Sec. 21.11.6. Prohibited Signs. A. Obscene Signs. No person shall erect or display on any site a sign in which the dominant theme of material taken as a whole appeals to the prurient interest in sex, and is patently offensive because it affronts current community standards relating to the description or representation of sexual matters, and is utterly without redeeming social literary, artistic, political, and scientific value, according to contemporary community standards. B. Obstructing Doors, Windows or Fire Escapes. No person shall erect or display on any site any sign that prevents free ingress to or egress from any door, window or fire escape. C. Obstructing Vision/Sight Triangle. No person shall erect or display on any site any sign in such a manner as to obstruct free and clear vision of moving vehicles at any location, street intersection, or driveway. All signs placed at any intersection shall prevent such problem by observing a visibility triangle (see definition of visibility triangle). D. Interference With Traffic. No sign shall be permitted which interferes with vehicular or pedestrian traffic as a result of the position, size, shape, movement, color, fashion, manner, or intensity of illumination, or any other characteristics causing such interference. No person shall erect or allow to be displayed any sign in such a manner as to interfere with, obstruct the view of, or be confused with any authorized traffic sign, signal, or device, including, signs making use of the words "stop", "go", "look", "slow", "danger", or any other similar word, phrase, symbol or character. No person shall employ any red, yellow, green, or other colored lamp or light in such a manner as to cause confusion or otherwise interfere with vehicular or pedestrian traffic. E. Over Public Property or Public Right-of-Way. It shall be prohibited to erect or display any type of sign on or over public ROW or other public property, unless the same is erected by the City, County, State or other authorized governmental agency, or with the permission of the City (in its sole disc retion), for public purposes. F. Signs on Utility Poles. No person shall erect or display any sign except as specifically authorized by section 21.11.5 on any utility pole located upon any public right -of-way or utility easement. G. Private Property. No sign shall be located on private property without the consent of the owner of the premises, including signs located on trees, light poles or mail boxes. H. Dilapidated Signs. No sign shall be permitted which is deteriorated, dilapidated or in danger of falling or otherwise unsafe. I. Signs in Violation. No sign shall be permitted that does not comply with any applicable provisions of the building code, this UDC, or any other applicable laws, ordinances, codes or regulations of the City. J. Home Occupation Signs. No exterior home occupation signs shall be permitted unless otherwise specifically authorized in another applicable section of this UDC. K. Non-Motorized or Portable Signs. No trailer type, non-motorized signs using wheels and axles as the primary support shall be permitted. L. Off Premise Signs. Except as set forth elsewhere in this Article, all off premise signs not legally existing on February 19, 2008 are prohibited except that the following signs may be permitted provided they otherwise meet the applicable requirements of this Article: 1. Community Service Signs; 2. Garage Sale Signs; 3. Official Government Signs; 4. Historical Markers and Plaques; 5. Political Signs; 6. Real Estate Signs; 7. Temporary Signs; 8. Traffic Signs; M. Bandit Signs. N. Painted Signs. No sign shall be permitted which is painted on the wall of any building or on any part of a building. O. Other Signs. Except as set forth elsewhere in this Article, any signs not specifically permitted by this Article are prohibited within the City and its ETJ. P. Balloon Signs including inflatable signs are prohibited regardless of size. Feather Flags are the only type of wind driven signs allowed. Sec. 21.11.17. Temporary Signs. A. General. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article, this section shall be applicable to all temporary signs identified in this Article. B. Maximum Area. The maximum area permitted for temporary signs shall not exceed Twenty Four Square Feet (24 sq.ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Sixteen Square Feet (16 sq.ft.). the following: Table 21.11.17A Maximum Area of Temporary Signs Areas with Limited Access 32 sq. ft. per face or ten percent (10%) of the building façade, whichever is less Areas with Unlimited Access 24 sq. ft. per face or seven percent (7%) of the building façade, whichever is less All Other Streets 16 sq. ft. per face or five percent (5%) of the building façade, whichever is less C. Maximum Height. The maximum height permitted for temporary signs shall not exceed Four Feet (4ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Eight Feet (8’). the following: Table 21.11.17B Maximum Height of Temporary Signs Areas with Limited Access 6 feet Areas with Unlimited Access 4 feet All Other Streets 3 feet D. Minimum Setback. The minimum setback for all temporary signs shall be fifteen feet (15') from any property line. E. Time Limitations. Temporary freestanding signs shall be permitted for a maximum of 120 180 days per calendar year. Temporary Sign permits will be issued for thirty (30) day increments. No additional temporary sign permit shall be issued for the same property or business for a period of fourteen (14) days after the expiration of the previous permit. There shall be no limit to the number of temporary sign permits that may be issued for a particular property or business. The cumulative total number of days for which all temporary sign permits issued for a property or business shall not exceed 180 120 calendar days. F. Number of Signs. No more than three (3) two (2) types of temporary signs shall be permitted per business or tenant at any given time. G. Recurring Event Permit. A Recurring Event Permit is for temporary signs that will be issued in two-day increments for up to fifteen (15) times per year. The applicant requesting a Recurring Event Permit must identify which 15 two day increments they intend to have the temporary signs when applying for the initial permit. The selected dates can be modified as dates change with prior approval. Ordinance 25-S-004 UDC Amendment for Article 11 Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs Emily Delgado | Planning Manager Background •At the November 12, 2024, City Council Workshop meeting, the Planning Division gave a presentation / workshop regarding updating the UDC for blowup signs and flags for advertising. •At the November 19, 2024, City Council meeting staff gave an additional workshop / presentation to further discuss proposed UDC amendments. •Public Hearing Notice was published on December 18th for the January 7th City Council meeting. •At the January 7th City Council meeting staff proposed the following UDC Amendmets: •Prohibition on wind driven signs including feather flags and inflatable / balloon signs regardless of size. •Increase Maximum Area to Thirty-Six Square Feet (36sq.ft.) •Increase Maximum Height to Six Feet (6ft.) •At the January 7th meeting it was made clear that there was a desire amongst City Council to allow feather flags and that staff needed to revise the proposed UDC Amendment. 2 Types of Temporary Signs: Wind Sign 3 “A” Frame Sign Balloon Sign Banner Sign Bandit Sign Examples of signage 4 Examples of signage 5 Proposed UDC Amendments: 6 Article UDC Section Current UDC Proposed Amendment 11 21.11.6- Prohibited Signs Currently inflatable / balloon signs are not in the listed of Prohibited Signs. Balloon Signs including inflatable signs are prohibited regardless of size. Feather Flags are the only type of wind driven signs allowed. 11 21.11.17.B Maximum Area •Areas with Limited Access: 32 sqft per face or 10% of the building façade, whichever is less. •Areas with Unlimited Access: 24 sqft per face or 7% of the building façade, whichever is less. •All Other Streets: 16 sqft per face or 5% of the building façade, whichever is less. Twenty- Four Square Feet (24 sq. ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Sixteen Square Feet (16 sq.ft.) 11 21.11.17C Maximum Height •Areas with Limited Access: 6 feet •Areas with Unlimited Access: 4 feet •All Other Streets: 3 feet Four Feet (4ft.) except that Feather Flags are limited to Eight Feet (8ft.) Proposed UDC Amendments: 7 Proposed UDC Amendments: 8 Proposed UDC Amendments: 9 Key Changes •Staff is proposing to treat feather flags as temporary signs. Feather flags are the only type of wind driven sign allowed. •Feather flags can be four feet taller (8' vs 4’) than other temporary signs but have less area (16 sq ft vs 24 sq ft). •Each business/tenant can have no more than 3 temporary signs up at one time (can be all feather flags or freestanding or a combination 2 of one and 1 of the other). This is a proposed increase to the overall number of temporary signs. •The total number of days they can have temporary signs up is 120 cumulative days. •Example: can have one sign up for 120 days or 3 signs up for 40 days or some combination of that. •Temporary signs will be issued for two-day increments, except that it can be shortened if they hit their maximum time. •Example, they can have 3 temporary signs up for 30 days and then one sign up for 30 days. 10 Key Changes •Creation of a "recurring event permit"that is issued in two day increments for up to 15 times per year. The applicant must identify which 15 two day increments they want when applying for the initial permit (these can be adjusted as dates change). •In summary •Businesses would be able to have feather flags, but not inflatable signs •They can have up to 3 temporary signs up at any one time, but they can only have 120 instances of temporary signs. •There is also the provision for short recurring event temporary signs. •The idea is to create a consistent framework to limit complexity and confusion. 11 Background •Staff is requesting that at the February 4th City Council meeting that feedback and direction can be provided if the proposal or some variation of it is desirable. •Additionally, in light of the extensive conversation on temporary signs and feedback received, staff has started drafting a full UDC Article 11 Signs rewrite. The goal of this rewrite will be to have sign regulations that are more easily understood, and to ensure that the signs that are being permitted are desired by City Council. •With this upcoming UDC Amendment for Article 11, which staff anticipates having to the City Council in April, staff is requesting that no formal action be taken on Ordinance 25-S-004. •Rather than adopting a small change in Article 11 and then in the upcoming couple of months making a full Article 11 rewrite, it seems more appropriate to provide direction on Temporary Signs using this ordinance presentation, not take action on the Ordinance itself and then the desired changes for Temporary Signs will be incorporated into the overall Article 11 rewrite. 12 13 1.The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, or general welfare of the City. •The proposed amendments •allow greater flexibility / larger temporary signs •increases the maximum height and maximum area for temporary •businesses will still be required to obtain a temporary sign permit which also ensures orderly development of the City •increase clarity on prohibited signs UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval 2. An amendment to the text is consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of this UDC and the City •Consistent with the goals and desires of the City Council as discussed at the previous City Council workshops and meetings. •Allows greater flexibility, which is consistent with other UDC Amendments that have been approved. •UDC amendment that clearly prohibits inflatable signage, it is clearer for business owners and applicants on what is allowed as a temporary sign in the City of Schertz. 14 3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law; •Meets the changing conditions / desires of the City Council •Adds clarity on temporary signs that are not desired •More clearly prohibits the use of inflatable signs •Proactively will allow businesses to have larger temporary signs and to have consistent height and area maximums for all businesses regardless of the property location. UDC SECTION 21.4.7.D Criteria for Approval 4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. •Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed Unified Development Code Amendments. Recommendation Staff Recommendation: •Staff is requesting that at the February 4th City Council meeting that feedback and direction be provided about whether the proposed changes are desirable. •Staff is requesting that no formal action be taken on Ordinance 25-S-004 but rather include these changes into the full rewrite of Article 11 that will be brought to the Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council in the next couple of months. Planning & Zoning Commission Recommendation: •The Planning and Zoning Commission met on December 4, 2024, held a public hearing, and made a recommendation of approval to City Council with a 6-0 vote on the UDC Amendment proposed which would: •prohibit wind driven signs including feather flags and inflatable / balloon signs •increase maximum area to 36 square feet •increase maximum height to 6 feet 15 Current UDC Article 11 Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs: •Maximum Area based on street classification: •Maximum Height based on street classification: Examples of Limited Access: IH 35 and IH 10 Examples of Unlimited Access: FM 78, FM 482, FM 1103, FM 1518, FM 2252, FM 3009, Schertz Parkway 16 Areas with Limited Access 32 sq. ft. per face or 10% of the building façade, whichever is less Areas with Unlimited Access 24 sq. ft. per face or 7% of the building façade, whichever is less All Other Streets 16 sq. ft. or 5% of the building façade, whichever is less Areas with Limited Access 6 Feet Areas with Unlimited Access 4 Feet All Other Streets 3 Feet Current UDC Art. 11 Sect. 21.11.17 Temporary Signs Continued: •Minimum Setback: •Setback for all temporary signs shall be fifteen feet (15’) from any property line. •Time Limitations: •Temporary freestanding signs shall be permitted for a maximum of 180 days per calendar year. •No additional temporary sign permit shall be issued for the same property or business for a period of fourteen (14) days after the expiration of the previous permit. •There shall be no limit to the number of temporary sign permits that may be issued for a particular property or business. •The cumulative total number of days for which all temporary sign permits issued for a property or business shall not exceed 180 calendar days. •Number of Signs: •No more than two (2) types of temporary signs shall be permitted per business or tenant at any given time. 17 UDC Article 16 Definitions: •Temporary Sign: Any sign identified by this UDC which is intended to be displayed for seasonal or brief activities including, but not limited to, sales, specials, promotions, holidays, auctions, and/or business grand openings. •Wind Sign: Any display or series of displays, banners, flags, pennants or other such objects designed and fashioned in such a manner as to move when subjected to wind pressure. Wind signs shall only be permitted as temporary signs. •"A" Frame Sign: A temporary sign constructed in such a manner as to form an "A" or a tent-like shape, hinged or not hinged at the top with each angular face held at an appropriate distance so as to be adequately secured by a supporting member. These signs may also be referred to as sandwich board signs. 18 UDC Article 16 Definitions: •Balloon Sign: One or more inflatable devices filled with lighter-than-air gas used as a temporary sign for the purpose of directing attention to any location, event, person, product, good, service, activity, institution or business. •Banner Sign: A temporary sign constructed of a natural or man -made flexible material including, but not limited to, cloth, canvas, vinyl, or fabric which can be easily folded or rolled that is mounted with or without an enclosing framework that is attached or tethered to the building or structures. •Pennant: Any long, narrow, usually triangular flag composed primarily of cloth, paper, fabric or other similar non-rigid material which may be used as a temporary sign to announce grand openings and/or special events. •Bandit Sign: Any temporary ground sign announcing a subdivision, new development or builder. (Bandit Signs are Prohibited per UDC Section 21.11.6) 19 Agenda No. 14.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Executive Team Subject: Resolution 25-R-021 - Authorizing the approval of a Development Agreement with BFR LLC for the approximately 30 acre tract at FM 1518 and Woman Hollering Road (S.Williams/B.James) BACKGROUND Staff is recommending City Council authorize a Development Agreement with BFR LLC. The agreement commits the City to providing water and sewer service to their property, an approximately 30 acre tract located at the northeast corner of Woman Hollering Road and FM 1518,  that is currently in the City's Extraterritorial Jurisdiction (ETJ) and to limit city water and sewer impact fees to the amount currently being charged. Additionally, it provides that the proposed use of the property, a multi-family complex, be an allowed use. The owner agrees to petition for voluntary annexation once the project has been constructed. In an effort to keep this item and the request for water and sewer service moving forward, staff has placed this item and agreement on the agenda prior to a full review having been completed by the owner and the City Attorney. As such updates may be provided prior to the meeting. GOAL Authorize a Development Agreement to provide for the orderly growth and development of property. COMMUNITY BENEFIT Provides for the orderly growth and development of property that allows for the City to better plan for infrastructure needs. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Resolution 25-R-021 authorizing a Development Agreement with BFR LLC the owner of an approximately 30 acre tract at the corner of FM 1518 and Woman Hollering Road.  RECOMMENDATION Approval of Resolution 25-R-021. Attachments Resolution 25-R-021 with attachment  Agenda No. 15.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Public Works Subject: Ordinance 25-F-006 - Conduct a public hearing and consider an amendment to Ordinance 14-F-20 amending the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan which is incorporated adopted by reference in the Schertz Code or Ordinances, Chapter 90 Utilities, Article IV Mandatory Water Conservation, Section 90-119 Drought Contingency and Emergency Response Plan Adopted (B.James/L.Busch/Z.Eaton) BACKGROUND The City is required to review and resubmit a compliant drought contingency plan every 5 years. As part of the resubmittal process, the City was notified of deficiencies in the plan regarding provisions for pro rata curtailment and wholesale customers.    This amendment to the previously adopted Ordinance 13-F-26 will bring the Plan into compliance with TCEQ 30 TAC §288 and Texas Water Code §11.039. These sections require the following (from 30 TAC 288.22):   “The drought contingency plan must include a provision in every wholesale water contract entered into or renewed after adoption of the plan, including contract extensions, that in case of a shortage of water resulting from drought, the water to be distributed shall be divided in accordance with Texas Water Code, §11.039.”  “Pro rata curtailment of water deliveries to or diversions by wholesale water customers as provided in Texas Water Code, §11.039”  Public hearing and approval of this ordinance is required for staff to resubmit the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan to the Texas Water Development Board.  GOAL The goal of the proposed amended Code Chapter 90 Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan is to provide an updated Code that is compliant with regulations in Texas Water Code §11.039, and applicable requirements of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality 30 TAC §288.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT The amended Code Chapter 90 benefits the community by maintaining compliance with Texas Water Code §11.039, TCEQ 30 TAC §288.  SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of Ordinance 25-F-006, an amendment to Ordinance 14-F-20 amending the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan which is incorporated adopted by reference in the Schertz Code or Ordinances, Chapter 90 Utilities, Article IV Mandatory Water Conservation, Section 90-119 Drought Contingency and Emergency Response Plan.  FISCAL IMPACT Fiscal impact will vary depending on the specific stage of restrictions that are activated in the Plan. The surcharge rate is included in each applicable section of the Plan.  RECOMMENDATION Approval of Ordinance 25-F-006.  Attachments Ordinance 25-F-006 with attachment  Redline of Drought Plan  ORDINANCE NO. 25-F-006 AN ORDINANCE BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS AMENDING ORDINANCES 09-F-17, 09-F-21 AND 13-F-26 TO AMEND THE DROUGHT CONTIGNECY AND WATER EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN AS INCORPORATED INTO CHAPTER 90 OF THE SCHERTZ CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 90-119; REPEALING ALL ORDINANCES OR PARTS OF ORDINANCES IN CONFLICT WITH THIS ORDINANCE; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance 09-F-17, the City of Schertz (the “City”) adopted as amended and restated Code of Ordinances Chapter 90, Article IV on May 26, 2009, as further amended by Ordinance 09-F-21, Ordinance 13-F-26 and Ordinance14-F-20 (the “Current Code”) the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan and Water Conservation Plan; and WHEREAS, Section 11.1272 & 11.039 of the Texas Water Code and applicable rules of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality along with requirements of 30 TAC 288 require all public water supply systems in Texas to prepare a drought contingency and water conservation plan; and WHEREAS, City staff have reviewed the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan and have recommended certain revisions and updates to, and reorganization of, portions of the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan; and WHEREAS, as authorized under law, and in the best interests of the residents of Schertz, Texas, the City Council deems it expedient and necessary to amend the City’s rules and policies for the orderly and efficient management of limited water supplies continually and more aggressively during drought and other water supply emergencies; WHEREAS, on February 4, 2025, the City Council conducted a public hearing and after considering the matter, determined that the proposed amendments are appropriate and in the best interests of the public safety, health, and welfare; and NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby amends the Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan as adopted and amended by Ordinances 09 -F-17, 09-F-21,13- F-26 and 14-F-20 as incorporated by Chapter 90 Section 90-119 in the Schertz Code of Ordinances as set forth on Exhibit “A” hereto. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Ordinance for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the Council. Section 3. All ordinances and codes, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Ordinance shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Ordinance shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City hereby declares that this Ordinance would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Ordinance is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, includ ing this Ordinance, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, as amended, Texas Government Code. Section 7. This Ordinance shall be effective upon the date of final adoption hereof and any publication required by law. Section 8. This Ordinance shall be cumulative of all other ordinances of the City of Schertz, and this Ordinance shall not operate to repeal or affect any other ordinances of the City of Schertz except insofar as the provisions thereof might be inconsistent or in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, in which event such conflicting provisions, if any, are hereby repealed. PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED ON this _____ of __________, 2025. CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS _____________________________ Ralph Gutierrez, Mayor ATTEST: Sheila Edmondson, City Secretary (city seal) Exhibit “A” Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan For The City of Schertz Public Water Supply DROUGHT CONTINGENCY AND WATER EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF SCHERTZ Section I: Declaration of Policy, Purpose, and Intent In order to conserve the available water supply and protect the integrity of water supply facilities, with particular regard for domestic water use, sanitation, and fire protection, and to protect and preserve public health, welfare, and safety and minimize the adverse impacts of water supply shortage or other water supply emergency conditions, the City of Schertz hereby adopts the following Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan (the Plan). Water uses regulated or prohibited under the Plan are considered to be non-essential, and continuation of such uses during times of water shortage or other emergency water supply condition are deemed to constitute a waste of water which subjects the offender(s) to penalties as defined in Section XII and XIII of the Plan. Section II: Public Involvement Opportunity for the public and wholesale customers to provide input into the preparation of the Plan was provided by the City of Schertz by means of scheduling and providing public notice of a public meeting to accept input on the Plan. Section III: Public Education The City of Schertz will periodically provide the public and wholesale customers with information about the Plan, including information about the conditions under which each stage of the Plan is to be initiated or terminated and the drought response measures to be implemented in each stage. This information will be provided by means of the City web site, newsletter and utility bill messages. Section IV: Coordination with Regional Water Planning Groups The service area of the City of Schertz is located within the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) and Edwards Aquifer Authority. The City of Schertz has provided a copy of this Plan to the Edwards Aquifer Authority, Texas Water Development Board, SSLGC and San Antonio River Authority representing Region “L” for the State. Section V: Authorization The City Manager or his/her designee is hereby authorized and directed to implement the applicable provisions of the Plan upon determination that such implementation is necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to initiate or terminate drought or other water supply emergency response measures as described in this Plan. Section VI: Application Provisions of the Plan shall apply to all persons, customers, and property utilizing water provided by the City of Schertz. The terms “person” and “customer” as used in the Plan include individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations, and all other legal entities. Section VII: Definitions For the purposes of the Plan, the following definitions shall apply: Aesthetic Water Use: Water used for ornamental or decorative purposes such as fountains, reflecting pools, and water gardens. Athletic Field: A sports play field including playgrounds whose essential feature is a grass turf, other than a golf course. (a) Conforming athletic field – An athletic field with an approved groundwater conservation plan under section XI of this Plan. (b) Non-conforming athletic field – Any other athletic field that is not a conforming athletic field. Commercial and Institutional Water Use: Water use which is integral to the operations of commercial and non-profit establishments and governmental entities, public or private schools, retail establishments, hotels and motels, restaurants, office buildings and Homeowner/Neighborhood Associations. Conservation: Those practices, techniques, and technologies that reduce the consumption of water, reduce the loss or waste of water, improve the efficiency in the use of water or increase the recycling and reuse of water so that a supply is conserved and made available for future or alternative uses. Customer: Any person, company, or organization using water supplied by City of Schertz. Domestic Water Use: Water use for personal needs or for household or sanitary purposes such as drinking, bathing, heating, cooking, sanitation, or for cleaning a residence, business, industry, or institution. Golf Course: An area of land used for the game of golf. (a) Conforming Golf Course – A golf course with an approved groundwater conservation plan pursuant to Section X of this Plan. (b) Non-conforming golf course – Any other golf course that is not a conforming golf course. Hand-held Watering: A hose or bucket physically attended by a person, fitted with a manual or automatic shutoff nozzle. Industrial Water Use: The use of water in processes designed to convert materials of lower value into forms having greater usability and value. Landscape irrigation use: Water used for the irrigation and maintenance of landscaped areas, whether publicly or privately owned, including residential and commercial lawns, gardens, golf courses, parks, and rights-of-way and medians, but does not include: (a) Non-discretionary use without waste of groundwater by a commercial nursery to the extent the water is used for production rather than decorative landscaping; (b) Application of groundwater without waste to a non-commercial family garden or orchard, the produce of which is for household consumption only; (c) Application of groundwater by means of hand-held bucket, hand-held hose; soaker hose or properly installed drip irrigation system; and (d) Application of groundwater by means of a soaker hose, hand-held hose, or properly installed drip irrigation system immediately next to a concrete foundation solely for the purpose of preventing, to the extent the watering is necessary, substantial damage to the foundation of the structure caused by movement of the foundation. Mobile Home Communities: Property owned by an individual or commercial establishment who rents such property for mobile or manufactured homes placement; must comply with the requirements and restrictions as a “Customer” in this section. Non-essential Water Use: Water uses that are not essential or required for the protection of public, health, safety, and welfare, including: (a) Irrigation of landscape areas, including parks, athletic fields, and golf courses, except otherwise provided under this Plan; (b) Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, motorbike, boat, trailer, airplane or other vehicle; (c) Use of water to wash down any sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard-surfaced areas; (d) use of water to wash down buildings or structures for purposes other than immediate fire protection; (e) flushing gutters or permitting water to run or accumulate in any gutter or street; (f) use of water to fill, refill, or add to any indoor or outdoor swimming pools or Jacuzzi-type pools; (g) use of water in a fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes except where necessary to support aquatic life; (h) failure to repair a controllable leak(s) within a reasonable period after having been given notice directing the repair of such leak(s); and (i) use of water from hydrants for construction purposes or any other purposes other than fire fighting. Private Water Well: Well on private property that is not inter-connected with the City’s water. Pro Rata Water Allocation: In Accordance with Texas Water Code Section 11.039, The Director of Public Works or their designee is hereby authorized to initiate allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis. Pro-rata curtailment will be conducted in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. Additionally, all new, renewed, or extended wholesale supply contracts will include a provision stipulating that water distribution will occur on a pro-rata basis in the event of a water shortage resulting from drought. Enforcement actions for non-compliance with either the Water Conservation Plan or pro-rata water reductions by wholesale customers will be determined based on the specifics outlined in each wholesale customer’s contract. Re-Use Water: A treated non-potable water source used for irrigation. Wasting Water: Watering a non-pervious surface or landscape watering that goes beyond a customer’s property. Waste of water also includes, but is not limited to, allowing water to run off into a gutter, ditch or drain, or failing to repair a controllable leak. Wholesale: A specific contractual agreement between an individual and/or entity that, for compensation, supplies water to another for resale to the public for human consumption. Every wholesale water contract entered into or renewed after adoption of the Plan, including contract extensions, that in case of a shortage of water resulting from drought, the water to be distributed shall be divided in accordance with Texas Water Code, §11.039. Wholesale customers are required to adopt and follow a state-approved Drought Contingency Plan. This Plan must require its customers to reduce use in the event that The City of Schertz enters into a drought restriction stage. In the absence of a state-approved Drought Contingency Plan, wholesale customers must follow The City of Schertz drought contingency plan. Section VIII: Triggering Criteria for Initiation and Termination of Drought Restriction Stages The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall monitor water supply and/or demand conditions on a daily basis and shall determine when conditions warrant initiation or termination of each stage of the Plan. Public notification of the initiation or termination of drought response stages shall be by means of publication in local newspaper and/or signs posted in public places. The triggering criteria described below are based on the analysis of system capability and the rules of the Gonzales Underground Water Conservation District (GCUWCD) and SSLGC. In the event that SSLGC can not provide water, the City of Schertz will immediately implement Stage 4 restrictions. Stage 1 – Restrictions—MILD Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation – It is mandatory that customers conserve water and adhere to the prescribed restrictions on certain water uses, defined in Section VII – Definitions, when one or all of the following are reached (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 1 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 100% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 85% of allowable. (d) The City’s water system has malfunctioned, but is still able to keep up with demand. Requirements for Termination - Stage 1 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Stage 2 – Restrictions -- MODERATE Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions on certain non-essential water uses provided in Section VII of the Plan when one or all of the following are reached: (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 2 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 110% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 95% of allowable. (d) The City’s water system has malfunctioned, and cannot keep up with demand. Requirements for Termination - Stage 2 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon termination of Stage 2, Stage 1 becomes operative. Stage 3 – Restrictions -- SEVERE Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions on certain non-essential water uses for Stage 3 of the Plan when one or all of the following are reached: (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 3 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 120% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 100% of allowable. (d) Water quality is less than normal or is polluted. Health and safety standards may be jeopardized. (e) The imminent or actual failure of a major component of the City’s water system would cause immediate health and safety hazard. Requirements for Termination - Stage 3 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon termination of Stage 3, Stage 2 becomes operative. Stage 4 – Emergency Restrictions -- CRITICAL Water Shortage Conditions Including System or Water Quality Failure Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions for Stage 4 of the Plan when the Mayor, or his/her designee, determines that a water supply emergency exists based on: (a) The General Manager of SSLGC, with concurrence of the SSLGC Executive Committee or Board of Directors, finds that conditions warrant the declaration of Stage 4. (b) Water demand exceeds 125% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules exceeds 115% of allowable. (d) Major water line breaks, or pump or system failures occur, which cause unprecedented loss of capability of the City to provide water service. (e) Natural or man-made contamination of the water supply source(s). Requirements for Termination – Stage 4 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days, or when items (d) and (e) above have been repaired. Water Rationing Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the water rationing allocation plan prescribed in Section XIII of the Plan when the Mayor and City Council determine that the water supply emergency exists and comply with the requirements and restrictions for Stage 4 of the Plan when: (a) Extreme drought conditions exist; (b) Major water line breaks, or pump or system failures occur, which cause unprecedented loss of capability to provide water service; or (c) Natural or man-made contamination of the water supply source occurs. Requirements for Termination - Water rationing may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Section IX: 1. Wasting Water: (a) It shall be unlawful for any person or customer to waste water. (b) Year round outdoor watering between 10:00 am – 8:00 pm is prohibited. (c) It shall be a violation if a person or customer allows water to run off into a non- pervious ditch, or failure to repair a controllable leak. (d) Re-use water usage is exempt from the plan. (e) Customers using water from a private water well must comply with all requirements of the plan. 2. Drought Response Stages The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall monitor water supply and/or demand conditions on a daily basis and, in accordance with the triggering criteria set forth in Section VIII of the Plan, shall determine that Stage 1, 2, 3 or 4 conditions exist and shall implement the following actions upon publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation and/or signs posted in public places and city web site: Stage 1 – Restrictions -- MILD Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a mandatory ten percent (10%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall be responsible for overseeing the reduction or discontinued flushing of water mains, activation and use of an alternative supply source(s), use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes, and blending of alternate sources. Water Use Restrictions: Under the threat of penalty for violation, the following water use restrictions shall apply to all persons: (a) Water customers shall comply with mandatory limits of irrigation of landscape areas. Watering days will be based on the last digit of the address: 0-1 - Monday 2-3 - Tuesday 4-5 - Wednesday 6-7 - Thursday 8-9 - Friday (b) Athletic Fields and Golf Courses – Conforming 10% reduction in watering as per Section X & XI. Non-conforming 15% reduction in watering as per Section X & XI. (c) Commercial/Industrial/Schools/Institutional landscape watering is permitted on Wednesday only. (d) Watering of landscape is permitted only between the hours of 12:00 am to 10:00 am and 8:00 pm to midnight on designated watering days. (e) All operations of the City of Schertz shall adhere to water use restrictions prescribed for Stage 1 of the Plan. (f) Water customers are requested to practice water conservation and to minimize or discontinue water use for non-essential purposes. (g) Handheld, bucket or drip system is allowed. (h) New landscape may have 3 weeks variance for establishment. All variances must be reviewed and approved by the City Manager or Director of Public Works or their designee. (i) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a re-circulation system. Stage 2 – Restrictions -- MODERATE Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a fifteen percent (15%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: Under threat of penalty for violation, the following water use restrictions shall apply to all persons, along with previous restrictions from Stage 1: (a) Water customers shall comply with mandatory limits of irrigation of landscape areas. Watering days will be based on the last digit of the address: 0-1- Monday 2-3 - Tuesday 4-5 - Wednesday 6-7 - Thursday 8-9 - Friday (b) Athletic Fields and Golf Courses- Conforming: 15% reduction watering as per Section X & XI. Non-conforming: 20% reduction watering as per Section X & XI. (c) Commercial/Industrial/Schools/Institutional landscape watering is permitted on Wednesday only. (d) Watering of landscape is permitted only between the hours of 3:00 am to 8:00 am and 8:00 pm to 10:00 pm. (e) Filling of all new and existing swimming pools is prohibited, unless at least 30% of the water is obtained from a source other than the aquifer. Groundwater may be used to replenish swimming pools to maintenance levels. Draining of swimming pools is permitted only onto a pervious surface or onto a pool deck where the water is transmitted directly to a pervious surface, and only if necessary to: (1) Remove excess water from the pool due to rain to lower the water to the maintenance level; (2) Repair, maintain, or replace a pool component that has become hazardous; or (3) Repair a pool leak. (f) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a recirculation system. (g) Use of water from fire hydrants shall be limited to fire fighting and related activities, or other activities necessary to maintain public health, safety, and welfare, except that use of water from designated fire hydrants for construction purposes may be allowed under special permit from the City of Schertz. (h) All restaurants are prohibited from serving water to its patrons except when requested. (i) The following uses of water are defined as non-essential and are prohibited: 1. Wash down of any sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard-surfaced areas; 2. Use of water to wash down buildings or structures for purposes other than immediate fire protection; 3. Use of water for dust control; 4. Flushing gutters or permitting water to run or accumulate in any gutter or street; and 5. Failure to repair a controllable leak(s) within a reasonable period after having been given notice directing the repair of such leak(s). Stage 3 – Restrictions -- SEVERE Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a twenty-five percent (25%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: All requirements of Stages 1 & 2 shall remain in effect during Stage 3 except: (a) Landscape watering is prohibited except by handheld watering or drip irrigation during designated watering days as described in Stage 1 & 2. (b) The watering of golf course is prohibited unless the golf course utilizes a reuse water source. (c) The use of water for construction purposes from designated fire hydrants under special permit is to be discontinued. (d) The filling, refilling, or adding of water to swimming pools, wading pools, and jacuzzi-type pools are prohibited. (e) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a recirculation system. (f) No applications for additional, expanded, or increased-in-size water service connections, meters, service lines, pipeline extensions, mains, or water service facilities of any kind shall be allowed or approved. (g) Application of groundwater in the morning before 8:00 am and in the evening after 8:00 pm by means of a handheld bucket, handheld hose, soaker hose or properly installed drip irrigation system, immediately next to a concrete foundation solely for the purpose of preventing, and to the extent the watering is necessary to prevent, substantial damage to the foundation or the structure caused by movement of the foundation. (h ) Athletic field - Conforming 25% reduction watering as in Section XI Non-conforming 30% reduction watering as in Section XI. Stage 4 - Emergency Restrictions -- CRITICAL Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a forty percent (40%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: All requirements of Stages 1,2, and 3 shall remain in effect during Stage 4 except: (a) Irrigation of landscaped areas is absolutely prohibited. (b) Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, motorbike, boat, trailer, airplane or other vehicle is absolutely prohibited. (c) Implementation of additional drought contingency measures may be applied at the direction of the City of Schertz. Section X: Golf Courses Notwithstanding any other language in the Plan, the owners of golf courses that are applicants or customers of an applicant shall be required to submit a groundwater conservation plan and shall be defined as "conforming" and "non- conforming" and shall reduce usage of aquifer groundwater under the following terms: 1. It shall be unlawful to water any golf course between the hours of 10:00 am and 8:00 pm. 2. A conforming golf course is one that achieves enhanced conservation by utilizing a computer controlled irrigation system ("CCIS"), or similar system, which may be comprised of a computer controller (digital operating system), software, interface modules, satellite, field controller, soil sensors, weather station, or similar devices, which is capable of achieving maximum efficiency and conservation in the application of water to the golf course, must accomplish the following restrictions listed in subparagraphs (A)-(C) of this paragraph: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions – 10% reduction in the replacement of daily evapotranspiration rate ("ET rate") or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (B) Stage 2 Restrictions – 15% reduction in the replacement of daily (ET) rate or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 25% reduction in the replacement of daily (ET) rate or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 75% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity not to exceed 60% of metered amount. (3) A non-conforming golf course shall comply with the following reduction measures listed in paragraphs (A)-(C) of this subsection: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions - 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (B) Stage 2 Restrictions - 20% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 30% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 85% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 60% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (4) The owner or operator of a golf course must comply with all rules relating to Stage 3 and 4. (5) The owner or operator of a golf course must maintain daily water use records which must be available for inspection upon request. (6) The owner or operator of a conforming golf course or a golf course with a CCIS must maintain daily water use records of their ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, which must be available for inspection upon request. (7) All daily records must be kept on site. Section XI: Athletic Fields Notwithstanding any other language in the Plan, the owners of athletic fields that are applicants or customers of an applicant shall be required to submit a groundwater conservation plan and shall be defined as "conforming" or "non- conforming" and shall reduce usage of City supplied groundwater under the following terms: 1. It shall be unlawful to water any athletic field between the hours of 10:00 am and 8:00 pm 2. A conforming athletic field is one that achieves enhanced conservation by utilizing a CCIS, or similar system, which may be comprised of a computer controller (digital operating system), software, interface modules, satellite, field controller, soil sensors, weather station, or similar devices, which is capable of achieving maximum efficiency and conservation in the application of water to the athletic field, must accomplish the following restrictions listed in subparagraphs (A)-(C) of this paragraph: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions – 10% reduction in the replacement of daily evapotranspiration rate ("ET rate") or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (B) Stage 2 Restrictions – 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month, (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 25% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 75% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, not to exceed 60% of metered amount. (3) A non-conforming athletic field shall comply with the foI1owing reduction measures listed in paragraphs (A)-(C) of this subsection: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions - 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS; (B) Stage 2 Restrictions - 20% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS; (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 30% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 85% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 60% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS. (4) The owner or operator of an athletic field must comply with all rules relating to Stage 3 and 4. (5) The owner or operator of an athletic field must maintain daily water use records, which must be available for inspection upon request. (6) The owner or operator of a conforming athletic field or an athletic field with a CCIS must maintain daily water use records of their ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, which must be available for inspection upon request. (7) All daily records must be kept on site. Section XI.2: Single-Pass Cooling System Connections and Non-Recirculating Systems Prohibited Single-pass cooling system connections and non-recirculating systems for commercial laundry facilities, carwash facilities, and other business activities shall be prohibited in all facilities built or remodeled after August 20, 2013 the effective date of Ordinance 13-F-26. Section XII: Water Rationing In the event that water shortage conditions threaten public health, safety, and welfare, the Mayor is hereby authorized to require water ration watering according to the following water allocation plan: Single-Family Residential Customers The allocation to residential water customers residing in a single-family dwelling shall be as follows: Persons per Household Gallons per Month 1 or 2 6,000 3 or 4 7,000 5 or 6 8,000 7 or 8 9,000 9 or 10 10,000 11 or more 12,000 “Household” means the residential premises served by the customer’s meter. “Persons per household” includes only those persons currently physically residing at the premises and expected to reside there for the entire billing period. It shall be assumed that a particular customer’s household is comprised of two (2) persons unless the customer notifies the City of Schertz of a greater number of persons per household on a form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that such forms are mailed, otherwise provided, or made available to every residential customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such a form, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to go to the City of Schertz offices to complete and sign the form claiming more than two (2) persons per household. New customers may claim the number of persons per household at the time of applying for water service on the form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. When the number of persons per household increases so as to place the customer in a different allocation category, the customer may notify the City of Schertz on such form and the change will be implemented in the next practicable billing period. If the number of persons in a household is reduced, the customer shall notify the City of Schertz in writing within two (2) days. In prescribing the method for claiming more than two (2) persons per household, the Director of Public Works shall adopt methods to insure the accuracy of the claim. Any person who knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence falsely reports the number of persons in a household or fails to timely notify the City of Schertz of a reduction in the number of person in a household shall be fined not less than $200.00. Residential water customers shall pay the following surcharges: $2.00 for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. Surcharges shall be cumulative. Master-Metered Multi-Family Residential Customers The allocation to a customer billed from a master meter which jointly measures water to multiple permanent residential dwelling units (e.g., apartments, mobile homes) shall be allocated 6,000 gallons per month for each dwelling unit. It shall be assumed that such a customer’s meter serves two dwelling units unless the customer notifies the City of Schertz of a greater number on a form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that such forms are mailed, otherwise provided, or made available to every such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such a form, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to go to the City of Schertz offices to complete and sign the form claiming more than two (2) dwellings. A dwelling unit may be claimed under this provision whether it is occupied or not. New customers may claim only those occupying the dwelling unit at the time of applying for water service on the form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. If the number of dwelling units served by a master meter is reduced, the customer shall notify the City of Schertz in writing within two (2) days. In prescribing the method for claiming more than two (2) dwelling units, the Director of Public Works shall adopt methods to insure the accuracy of the claim. Any person who knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence falsely reports the number of dwelling units served by a master meter or fails to timely notify the City of Schertz of a reduction in the number of person in a household shall be fined not less than $200.00. Customers billed from a master meter under this provision shall pay the following monthly surcharges: $2.00 for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. Surcharges shall be cumulative. Commercial Customers A monthly water usage allocation shall be established by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, for each nonresidential commercial customer other than an industrial customer who uses water for processing purposes. The non-residential customer’s allocation shall be approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the customer’s usage for corresponding month’s billing period for the previous 12 months. If the customer’s billing history is shorter than 12 months, the monthly average for the period for which there is a record shall be used for any monthly period for which no history exists. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that notice of each non - residential customer’s allocation is mailed to such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such notice, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to contact the City of Schertz to determine the allocation. Upon request of the customer or at the initiative of the Director of Public Works, the allocation may be reduced or increased if, (1) the designated period does not accurately reflect the customer’s normal water usage, (2) one nonresidential customer agrees to transfer part of its allocation to another nonresidential customer, or (3) other objective evidence demonstrates that the designated allocation is inaccurate under present conditions. A customer may appeal an allocation established hereunder to the City Manager. Nonresidential commercial customers shall pay the following surcharges: $2.00 per thousand gallons for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 per thousand gallons for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 per thousand gallons for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 per thousand gallons for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. The surcharges shall be cumulative. As used herein, “block rate” means the charge to the customer per 1,000 gallons at the regular water rate schedule at the level of the customer’s allocation. Industrial Customers and Commercial Nurseries A monthly water usage allocation shall be established by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, for each industrial customer, which uses water for processing purposes. The industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries allocation shall be approximately ninety percent (90%) of the customer’s water usage baseline. Ninety (90) days after the initial imposition of the allocation for industrial customers and commercial nurseries , the industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries allocation shall be further reduced to 85% percent of the customer’s water usage baseline. The industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries water usage baseline will be computed on the average water usage for the 12 month period ending prior to the date of implementation of Stage 2 of the Plan. If the industrial water customer’s and commercial nurseries billing history is shorter than 12 months, the monthly average for the period for which there is a record shall be used for any monthly period for which no billing history exists. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that notice of each industrial customer and commercial nurseries allocation is mailed to such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such notice, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to contact the City of Schertz to determine the allocation, and the allocation shall be fully effective notwithstanding the lack of receipt of written notice. Upon request of the customer or at the initiative of the Director of Public Works, the allocation may be reduced or increased, (1) if the designated period does not accurately reflect the customer’s normal water usage because the customer had shut down a major processing unit for repair or overhaul during the period, (2) the customer has added or is in the process of adding significant additional processing capacity, (3) the customer has shut down or significantly reduced the production of a major processing unit, (4) the customer has previously implemented significant permanent water conservation measures such that the ability to further reduce usage is limited, (5) the customer agrees to transfer part of its allocation to another industrial customer and commercial nurseries, or (6) if other objective evidence demonstrates that the designated allocation is inaccurate under present conditions. A customer may appeal an allocation established hereunder to the City Manager. Industrial customers and commercial nurseries shall pay the following surcharges: Customers whose allocation is 90% of their twelve month average. $ 2.00 per thousand gallons for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 3.00 per thousand gallons for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 4.00 per thousand gallons for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 5.00 per thousand gallons for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. The surcharges shall be cumulative. As used herein, “block rate” means the charge to the customer per 1,000 gallons at the regular water rate schedule at the level of the customer’s allocation. Wholesale Customers The provisions of this Plan shall apply to all customers utilizing water provided by the City on a wholesale basis. Every wholesale water contract entered into, renewed or modified after official adoption of this Plan shall include language relating to the City of Schertz Drought Contingency Plan and shall require the imposition of similar restrictions, surcharges or rationin g measures on their customers. To the extent of its legal authority, the City of Schertz shall require its wholesale customers to implement outdoor watering restrictions similar to those of the City for each drought response stage or adopt the City of Schertz Drought Contingency Plan. The City requires that any contract for the resale of water furnished to wholesale water contractors shall contain a similar condition. In the event that the triggering criteria specified, the City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to implement allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis to raw water and treated wholesale customers in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. The initiation of pro rata allocation preparations shall begin during Stage 3. A provision will be included in every wholesale water contract entered into or renewed after adoption of the Plan, including contract extensions, that in case of a shortage of water resulting from drought, the water to be distributed shall be divided in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. A wholesale treated water customer's monthly allocation shall be a percentage of the customer's water usage baseline. The percentage will be set by resolution of the City Council based on the Gonzales Underground Water Conservation District (GCUWCD) and Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC)’s allocation to the City and the Director of Public Works’ assessment of the severity of the water shortage condition and the need to curtail water diversions and deliveries and may be adjusted periodically by resolution of the City Council as conditions warrant. Once pro rata allocation is in effect, water diversions by deliveries to each wholesale treated water customer shall be limited to the allocation established for each month. During any period when pro rata allocation of available water supplies is in effect, wholesale customers shall pay the following surcharges on excess water consumption: • 1.25 times the normal water rate per unit in excess of the monthly allocation up through 5% above the monthly allocation. • 1.5 times the normal water rate in excess of the monthly allocation from 5% through 10% above the monthly allocation. • 1.75 times the normal water rate in excess of the monthly allocation from 10% through 15% above the monthly allocation. • 2.0 times the normal water rate more than 15% above the monthly allocation. Section XIII: Enforcement (a) No person shall knowingly or intentionally allow the use of water from the City of Schertz for residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, governmental, or any other purpose in a manner contrary to any provision of this Plan, or in an amount in excess of that permitted by the drought response stage in effect at the time pursuant to action taken by the City Manager, or his/her designee, in accordance with provisions of this Plan. (b) Any person who violates this Plan is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction , shall be punished by a fine up to $200.00. Each day that one or more of the provisions in the Plan is violated shall constitute a separate offense. If a person is convicted of three or more distinct violations of this Plan, the Director of Public Works shall, upon due notice to the customer, be authorized to discontinue water service to the premises where such violations occur. Services discontinued under such circumstances shall be restored only upon payment of a re-connection charge, hereby established at $150.00, and any other costs incurred by the City of Schertz in discontinuing service. In addition, suitable assurance must be given to the Director of Public Works that the same action shall not be repeated while the Plan is in effect. Compliance with this Plan may also be sought through injunctive relief in the district court. (c) Any person, including a person classified as a water customer of the City of Schertz, in apparent control of the property where a violation occurs or originates shall be presumed to be the violator, and proof that the violation occurred on the person’s property shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that the person in apparent control of the property committed the violation, but any such person shall have the right to show that he/she did not commit the violation. Parents shall be presumed to be responsible for violations of their minor children and proof that a violation, committed by a child, occurred on property within the parents’ control shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that the parent committed the violation, but any such parent may be excused if he/she proves that he/she had previously directed the child not to use the water as it was used in violation of this Plan and that the parent could not have reasonably known of the violation. (d) Any police officer, code enforcement officer, or other City of Schertz employee designated by the Director of Public Works, may issue a citation to a person he/she reasonably believes to be in violation of this Ordinance. The citation shall be prepared in duplicate and shall contain the name and address of the alleged violator, if known, the offense charged, and shall direct him/her to appear in the municipal court on or before the 14th day following the date the citation was issued. The alleged violator shall be served a copy of the citation. Service of the citation shall be complete upon delivery of the citation to the alleged violator, to an agent or employee of a violator, or to a person over 14 years of age who is a member of the violator’s immediate family or is a resident of the violator’s residence. The alleged violator shall appear in municipal court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty for the violation of this Plan. If the alleged violator fails to appear in municipal court, a warrant for his/her arrest may be issued. A summons to appear may be issued in lieu of an arrest warrant. These cases shall be expedited and given preferential setting in municipal court before all other cases. Section XIV: Variances The City Manager, or his/her designee, may, in writing, grant temporary variance for existing water uses otherwise prohibited under this Plan if it is determined that failure to grant such variance would cause an emergency condition adversely affecting the health, sanitation, or fire protection for the public or the person requesting such variance and if one or more of the following conditions are met: (a) Compliance with this Plan cannot be technically accomplished during the duration of the water supply shortage or other condition for which the Plan is in effect. (b) Alternative methods can be implemented which will achieve the same level of reduction in water use. Persons requesting an exemption from the provisions of this Ordinance shall file a petition for variance with the City of Schertz within 5 days after the Plan or a particular drought response stage has been invoked. All petitions for variances shall be reviewed by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, and shall include the following: (a) Name and address of the petitioner(s). (b) Purpose of water use. (c) Specific provision(s) of the Plan from which the petitioner is requesting relief. (d) Detailed statement as to how the specific provision of the Plan adversely affects the petitioner or what damage or harm will occur to the petitioner or others if petitioner complies with this Ordinance. (e) Description of the relief requested. (f) Period of time for which the variance is sought. (g) Alternative water use restrictions or other measures the petitioner is taking or proposes to take to meet the intent of this Plan and the compliance date. (h) Other pertinent information. Variances granted by the City of Schertz shall be subject to the following conditions, unless waived or modified by the City Manager or his/her designee: (a) Variances granted shall include an acceptable timetable for compliance. (b) Variances granted shall expire when the Plan is no longer in effect, unless the petitioner has failed to meet specified requirements. No variance shall be retroactive or otherwise justify any violation of this Plan occurring prior to the issuance of the variance. Section XV: Severability It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City of Schertz that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Plan are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of the Plan shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of the Plan, since the same would not have been enacted by the City of Schertz without the incorporation into the Plan of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan For The City of Schertz Public Water Supply Proposed Chapter 90 Amendments Red Lines DROUGHT CONTINGENCY AND WATER EMERGENCY RESPONSE PLAN FOR THE CITY OF SCHERTZ Section I: Declaration of Policy, Purpose, and Intent In order to conserve the available water supply and protect the integrity of water supply facilities, with particular regard for domestic water use, sanitation, and fire protection, and to protect and preserve public health, welfare, and safety and minimize the adverse impacts of water supply shortage or other water supply emergency conditions, the City of Schertz hereby adopts the following Drought Contingency and Water Emergency Response Plan (the Plan). Water uses regulated or prohibited under the Plan are considered to be non-essential, and continuation of such uses during times of water shortage or other emergency water supply condition are deemed to constitute a waste of water which subjects the offender(s) to penalties as defined in Section XI I and XIII of the Plan. Section II: Public Involvement Opportunity for the public and wholesale customers to provide input into the preparation of the Plan was provided by the City of Schertz by means of scheduling and providing public notice of a public meeting to accept input on the Plan. Section III: Public Education The City of Schertz will periodically provide the public and wholesale customers with information about the Plan, including information about the conditions under which each stage of the Plan is to be initiated or terminated and the drought response measures to be implemented in each stage. This information will be provided by means of the City web site, newsletter and utility bill messages. Section IV: Coordination with Regional Water Planning Groups The service area of the City of Schertz is located within the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC) and Edwards Aquifer Authority. The City of Schertz has provided a copy of this Plan to the Edwards Aquifer Authority, Texas Water Development Board, SSLGC and San Antonio River Authority representing Region “L” for the State. Section V: Authorization The City Manager or his/her designee is hereby authorized and directed to implement the applicable provisions of the Plan upon determination that such implementation is necessary to protect public health, safety and welfare. The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall have the authority to initiate or terminate drought or other water supply emergency response measures as described in this Plan. Section VI: Application Provisions of the Plan shall apply to all persons, customers, and property utilizing water provided by the City of Schertz. The terms “person” and “customer” as used in the Plan include individuals, corporations, partnerships, associations, and all other legal entities. Section VII: Definitions For the purposes of the Plan, the following definitions shall apply: Aesthetic Water Use: Water used for ornamental or decorative purposes such as fountains, reflecting pools, and water gardens. Athletic Field: A sports play field including playgrounds whose essential feature is a grass turf, other than a golf course. (a) Conforming athletic field – An athletic field with an approved groundwater conservation plan under section XI of this Plan. (b) Non-conforming athletic field – Any other athletic field that is not a conforming athletic field. Commercial and Institutional Water Use: Water use which is integral to the operations of commercial and non-profit establishments and governmental entities, public or private schools, retail establishments, hotels and motels, restaurants, office buildings and Homeowner/Neighborhood Associations. Conservation: Those practices, techniques, and technologies that reduce the consumption of water, reduce the loss or waste of water, improve the efficiency in the use of water or increase the recycling and reuse of water so that a supply is conserved and made available for future or alternative uses. Customer: Any person, company, or organization using water supplied by City of Schertz. Domestic Water Use: Water use for personal needs or for household or sanitary purposes such as drinking, bathing, heating, cooking, sanitation, or for cleaning a residence, business, industry, or institution. Golf Course: An area of land used for the game of golf. (a) Conforming Golf Course – A golf course with an approved groundwater conservation plan pursuant to Section X of this Plan. (b) Non-conforming golf course – Any other golf course that is not a conforming golf course. Hand-held Watering: A hose or bucket physically attended by a person, fitted with a manual or automatic shutoff nozzle. Industrial Water Use: The use of water in processes designed to convert materials of lower value into forms having greater usability and value. Landscape irrigation use: Water used for the irrigation and maintenance of landscaped areas, whether publicly or privately owned, including residential and commercial lawns, gardens, golf courses, parks, and rights-of-way and medians, but does not include: (a) Non-discretionary use without waste of groundwater by a commercial nursery to the extent the water is used for production rather than decorative landscaping; (b) Application of groundwater without waste to a non-commercial family garden or orchard, the produce of which is for household consumption only; (c) Application of groundwater by means of hand-held bucket, hand-held hose; soaker hose or properly installed drip irrigation system; and (d) Application of groundwater by means of a soaker hose, hand-held hose, or properly installed drip irrigation system immediately next to a concrete foundation solely for the purpose of preventing, to the extent the watering is necessary, substantial damage to the foundation of the structure caused by movement of the foundation. Mobile Home Communities: Property owned by an individual or commercial establishment who rents such property for mobile or manufactured homes placement; must comply with the requirements and restrictions as a “Customer” in this section. Non-essential Water Use: Water uses that are not essential or required for the protection of public, health, safety, and welfare, including: (a) Irrigation of landscape areas, including parks, athletic fields, and golf courses, except otherwise provided under this Plan; (b) Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, motorbike, boat, trailer, airplane or other vehicle; (c) Use of water to wash down any sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard-surfaced areas; (d) use of water to wash down buildings or structures for purposes other than immediate fire protection; (e) flushing gutters or permitting water to run or accumulate in any gutter or street; (f) use of water to fill, refill, or add to any indoor or outdoor swimming pools or Jacuzzi-type pools; (g) use of water in a fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes except where necessary to support aquatic life; (h) failure to repair a controllable leak(s) within a reasonable period after having been given notice directing the repair of such leak(s); and (i) use of water from hydrants for construction purposes or any other purposes other than fire fighting. Private Water Well: Well on private property that is not inter-connected with the City’s water. Pro Rata Water Allocation: In Accordance with Texas Water Code Section 11.039, The Director of Public Works or their designee is hereby authorized to initiate allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis. Pro-rata curtailment will be conducted in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. Additionally, all new, renewed, or extended wholesale supply contracts will include a provision stipulating that water distribution will occur on a pro-rata basis in the event of a water shortage resulting from drought. Enforcement actions for non-compliance with either the Water Conservation Plan or pro-rata water reductions by wholesale customers will be determined based on the specifics outlined in each wholesale customer’s contract. Re-Use Water: A treated non-potable water source used for irrigation. Wasting Water: Watering a non-pervious surface or landscape watering that goes beyond a customer’s property. Waste of water also includes, but is not limited to, allowing water to run off into a gutter, ditch or drain, or failing to repair a controllable leak. Wholesale: A specific contractual agreement between an individual and/or entity that, for compensation, supplies water to another for resale to the public for human consumption. Every wholesale water contract entered into or renewed after adoption of the Plan, including contract extensions, that in case of a shortage of water resulting from drought, the water to be distributed shall be divided in accordance with Texas Water Code, §11.039. Wholesale customers are required to adopt and follow a state-approved Drought Contingency Plan. This Plan must require its customers to reduce use in the event that The City of Schertz enters into a drought restriction stage. In the absence of a state-approved Drought Contingency Plan, wholesale customers must follow The City of Schertz drought contingency plan. Section VIII: Triggering Criteria for Initiation and Termination of Drought Restriction Stages The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall monitor water supply and/or demand conditions on a daily basis and shall determine when conditions warrant initiation or termination of each stage of the Plan. Public notification of the initiation or termination of drought response stages shall be by means of publication in local newspaper and/or signs posted in public places. The triggering criteria described below are based on the analysis of system capability and the rules of the Gonzales Underground Water Conservation District (GCUWCD) and SSLGC. In the event that SSLGC can not provide water, the City of Schertz will immediately implement Stage 4 restrictions. Stage 1 – Restrictions—MILD Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation – It is mandatory that customers conserve water and adhere to the prescribed restrictions on certain water uses, defined in Section VII – Definitions, when one or all of the following are reached (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 1 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 100% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 85% of allowable. (d) The City’s water system has malfunctioned, but is still able to keep up with demand. Requirements for Termination - Stage 1 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Stage 2 – Restrictions -- MODERATE Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions on certain non-essential water uses provided in Section VII of the Plan when one or all of the following are reached: (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 2 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 110% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 95% of allowable. (d) The City’s water system has malfunctioned, and cannot keep up with demand. Requirements for Termination - Stage 2 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon termination of Stage 2, Stage 1 becomes operative. Stage 3 – Restrictions -- SEVERE Water Shortage Conditions Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions on certain non-essential water uses for Stage 3 of the Plan when one or all of the following are reached: (a) City of Schertz receives notification from the General Manager of SSLGC of Stage 3 conditions. (b) Water demand is projected to approach 120% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules equals 100% of allowable. (d) Water quality is less than normal or is polluted. Health and safety standards may be jeopardized. (e) The imminent or actual failure of a major component of the City’s water system would cause immediate health and safety hazard. Requirements for Termination - Stage 3 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Upon termination of Stage 3, Stage 2 becomes operative. Stage 4 – Emergency Restrictions -- CRITICAL Water Shortage Conditions Including System or Water Quality Failure Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the requirements and restrictions for Stage 4 of the Plan when the Mayor, or his/her designee, determines that a water supply emergency exists based on: (a) The General Manager of SSLGC, with concurrence of the SSLGC Executive Committee or Board of Directors, finds that conditions warrant the declaration of Stage 4. (b) Water demand exceeds 125% of the monthly limit of the GCUWCD permitted supply. (c) Annual Monthly Average Drawdown as measured by GCUWCD rules exceeds 115% of allowable. (d) Major water line breaks, or pump or system failures occur, which cause unprecedented loss of capability of the City to provide water service. (e) Natural or man-made contamination of the water supply source(s). Requirements for Termination – Stage 4 of the Plan may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days, or when items (d) and (e) above have been repaired. Water Rationing Requirements for Initiation - Customers shall be required to comply with the water rationing allocation plan prescribed in Section XIII of the Plan when the Mayor and City Council determine that the water supply emergency exists and comply with the requirements and restrictions for Stage 4 of the Plan when: (a) Extreme drought conditions exist; (b) Major water line breaks, or pump or system failures occur, which cause unprecedented loss of capability to provide water service; or (c) Natural or man-made contamination of the water supply source occurs. Requirements for Termination - Water rationing may be rescinded when all of the conditions listed as triggering events have ceased to exist for a period of thirty (30) consecutive days or when rescinded by the City Manager or his/her designee. Section IX: 1. Wasting Water: (a) It shall be unlawful for any person or customer to waste water. (b) Year round outdoor watering between 10:00 am – 8:00 pm is prohibited. (c) It shall be a violation if a person or customer allows water to run off into a non- pervious ditch, or failure to repair a controllable leak. (d) Re-use water usage is exempt from the plan. (e) Customers using water from a private water well must comply with all requirements of the plan. 2. Drought Response Stages The City Manager, or his/her designee, shall monitor water supply and/or demand conditions on a daily basis and, in accordance with the triggering criteria set forth in Section VIII of the Plan, shall determine that Stage 1, 2, 3 or 4 conditions exist and shall implement the following actions upon publication of notice in a newspaper of general circulation and/or signs posted in public places and city web site: Stage 1 – Restrictions -- MILD Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a mandatory ten percent (10%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall be responsible for overseeing the reduction or discontinued flushing of water mains, activation and use of an alternative supply source(s), use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes, and blending of alternate sources. Water Use Restrictions: Under the threat of penalty for violation, the following water use restrictions shall apply to all persons: (a) Water customers shall comply with mandatory limits of irrigation of landscape areas. Watering days will be based on the last digit of the address: 0-1 - Monday 2-3 - Tuesday 4-5 - Wednesday 6-7 - Thursday 8-9 - Friday (b) Athletic Fields and Golf Courses – Conforming 10% reduction in watering as per Section X & XI. Non-conforming 15% reduction in watering as per Section X & XI. (c) Commercial/Industrial/Schools/Institutional landscape watering is permitted on Wednesday only. (d) Watering of landscape is permitted only between the hours of 12:00 am to 10:00 am and 8:00 pm to midnight on designated watering days. (e) All operations of the City of Schertz shall adhere to water use restrictions prescribed for Stage 1 of the Plan. (f) Water customers are requested to practice water conservation and to minimize or discontinue water use for non-essential purposes. (g) Handheld, bucket or drip system is allowed. (h) New landscape may have 3 weeks variance for establishment. All variances must be reviewed and approved by the City Manager or Director of Public Works or their designee. (i) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a re-circulation system. Stage 2 – Restrictions -- MODERATE Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a fifteen percent (15%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: Under threat of penalty for violation, the following water use restrictions shall apply to all persons, along with previous restrictions from Stage 1: (a) Water customers shall comply with mandatory limits of irrigation of landscape areas. Watering days will be based on the last digit of the address: 0-1- Monday 2-3 - Tuesday 4-5 - Wednesday 6-7 - Thursday 8-9 - Friday (b) Athletic Fields and Golf Courses- Conforming: 15% reduction watering as per Section X & XI. Non-conforming: 20% reduction watering as per Section X & XI. (c) Commercial/Industrial/Schools/Institutional landscape watering is permitted on Wednesday only. (d) Watering of landscape is permitted only between the hours of 3:00 am to 8:00 am and 8:00 pm to 10:00 pm. (e) Filling of all new and existing swimming pools is prohibited, unless at least 30% of the water is obtained from a source other than the aquifer. Groundwater may be used to replenish swimming pools to maintenance levels. Draining of swimming pools is permitted only onto a pervious surface or onto a pool deck where the water is transmitted directly to a pervious surface, and only if necessary to: (1) Remove excess water from the pool due to rain to lower the water to the maintenance level; (2) Repair, maintain, or replace a pool component that has become hazardous; or (3) Repair a pool leak. (f) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a recirculation system. (g) Use of water from fire hydrants shall be limited to fire fighting and related activities, or other activities necessary to maintain public health, safety, and welfare, except that use of water from designated fire hydrants for construction purposes may be allowed under special permit from the City of Schertz. (h) All restaurants are prohibited from serving water to its patrons except when requested. (i) The following uses of water are defined as non-essential and are prohibited: 1. Wash down of any sidewalks, walkways, driveways, parking lots, tennis courts, or other hard-surfaced areas; 2. Use of water to wash down buildings or structures for purposes other than immediate fire protection; 3. Use of water for dust control; 4. Flushing gutters or permitting water to run or accumulate in any gutter or street; and 5. Failure to repair a controllable leak(s) within a reasonable period after having been given notice directing the repair of such leak(s). Stage 3 – Restrictions -- SEVERE Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a twenty-five percent (25%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: All requirements of Stages 1 & 2 shall remain in effect during Stage 3 except: (a) Landscape watering is prohibited except by handheld watering or drip irrigation during designated watering days as described in Stage 1 & 2. (b) The watering of golf course is prohibited unless the golf course utilizes a reuse water source. (c) The use of water for construction purposes from designated fire hydrants under special permit is to be discontinued. (d) The filling, refilling, or adding of water to swimming pools, wading pools, and jacuzzi-type pools are prohibited. (e) Operation of any ornamental fountain or pond for aesthetic or scenic purposes is prohibited except where necessary to support aquatic life or where such fountains or ponds are equipped with a recirculation system. (f) No applications for additional, expanded, or increased-in-size water service connections, meters, service lines, pipeline extensions, mains, or water service facilities of any kind shall be allowed or approved. (g) Application of groundwater in the morning before 8:00 am and in the evening after 8:00 pm by means of a handheld bucket, handheld hose, soaker hose or properly installed drip irrigation system, immediately next to a concrete foundation solely for the purpose of preventing, and to the extent the watering is necessary to prevent, substantial damage to the foundation or the structure caused by movement of the foundation. (h ) Athletic field - Conforming 25% reduction watering as in Section XI Non-conforming 30% reduction watering as in Section XI. Stage 4 - Emergency Restrictions -- CRITICAL Water Shortage Conditions Goal: Achieve a forty percent (40%) reduction in daily water demand. Supply Management Measures: Director of Public Works shall see that reduced or discontinued flushing of water mains, reduced or discontinued irrigation of public landscaped areas; use of blending an alternative supply source(s); use of reclaimed water for non-potable purposes. Water Use Restrictions: All requirements of Stages 1,2, and 3 shall remain in effect during Stage 4 except: (a) Irrigation of landscaped areas is absolutely prohibited. (b) Use of water to wash any motor vehicle, motorbike, boat, trailer, airplane or other vehicle is absolutely prohibited. (c) Implementation of additional drought contingency measures may be applied at the direction of the City of Schertz. Section X: Golf Courses Notwithstanding any other language in the Plan, the owners of golf courses that are applicants or customers of an applicant shall be required to submit a groundwater conservation plan and shall be defined as "conforming" and "non- conforming" and shall reduce usage of aquifer groundwater under the following terms: 1. It shall be unlawful to water any golf course between the hours of 10:00 am and 8:00 pm. 2. A conforming golf course is one that achieves enhanced conservation by utilizing a computer controlled irrigation system ("CCIS"), or similar system, which may be comprised of a computer controller (digital operating system), software, interface modules, satellite, field controller, soil sensors, weather station, or similar devices, which is capable of achieving maximum efficiency and conservation in the application of water to the golf course, must accomplish the following restrictions listed in subparagraphs (A)-(C) of this paragraph: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions – 10% reduction in the replacement of daily evapotranspiration rate ("ET rate") or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (B) Stage 2 Restrictions – 15% reduction in the replacement of daily (ET) rate or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 25% reduction in the replacement of daily (ET) rate or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 75% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity not to exceed 60% of metered amount. (3) A non-conforming golf course shall comply with the following reduction measures listed in paragraphs (A)-(C) of this subsection: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions - 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (B) Stage 2 Restrictions - 20% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 30% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 85% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 60% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for golf courses that are not equipped with a CCIS; (4) The owner or operator of a golf course must comply with all rules relating to Stage 3 and 4. (5) The owner or operator of a golf course must maintain daily water use records which must be available for inspection upon request. (6) The owner or operator of a conforming golf course or a golf course with a CCIS must maintain daily water use records of their ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, which must be available for inspection upon request. (7) All daily records must be kept on site. Section XI: Athletic Fields Notwithstanding any other language in the Plan, the owners of athletic fields that are applicants or customers of an applicant shall be required to submit a groundwater conservation plan and shall be defined as "conforming" or "non- conforming" and shall reduce usage of City supplied groundwater under the following terms: 1. It shall be unlawful to water any athletic field between the hours of 10:00 am and 8:00 pm 2. A conforming athletic field is one that achieves enhanced conservation by utilizing a CCIS, or similar system, which may be comprised of a computer controller (digital operating system), software, interface modules, satellite, field controller, soil s ensors, weather station, or similar devices, which is capable of achieving maximum efficiency and conservation in the application of water to the athletic field, must accomplish the following restrictions listed in subparagraphs (A)-(C) of this paragraph: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions – 10% reduction in the replacement of daily evapotranspiration rate ("ET rate") or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (B) Stage 2 Restrictions – 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity; or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month, (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 25% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, or use of not more than 75% of the metered amount for that corresponding month. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, not to exceed 60% of metered amount. (3) A non-conforming athletic field shall comply with the foI1owing reduction measures listed in paragraphs (A)-(C) of this subsection: (A) Stage 1 Restrictions - 15% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 95% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS; (B) Stage 2 Restrictions - 20% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 90% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS; (C) Stage 3 Restrictions - 30% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS, or use of not more than 85% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS. (D) Stage 4 Restrictions – 40% reduction in the replacement of daily ET rate as monitored by a properly operating CCIS or use of not more than 60% of the metered amount for that corresponding month for athletic fields that are not equipped with a CCIS. (4) The owner or operator of an athletic field must comply with all rules relating to Stage 3 and 4. (5) The owner or operator of an athletic field must maintain daily water use records, which must be available for inspection upon request. (6) The owner or operator of a conforming athletic field or an athletic field with a CCIS must maintain daily water use records of their ET rate or daily soil holding capacity, which must be available for inspection upon request. (7) All daily records must be kept on site. Section XI.2: Single-Pass Cooling System Connections and Non-Recirculating Systems Prohibited Single-pass cooling system connections and non-recirculating systems for commercial laundry facilities, carwash facilities, and other business activities shall be prohibited in all facilities built or remodeled after August 20, 2013 the effective date of Ordinance 13-F-26 this Section XI.2. Section XII: Water Rationing In the event that water shortage conditions threaten public health, safety, and welfare, the Mayor is hereby authorized to require water ration watering according to the following water allocation plan: Single-Family Residential Customers The allocation to residential water customers residing in a single-family dwelling shall be as follows: Persons per Household Gallons per Month 1 or 2 6,000 3 or 4 7,000 5 or 6 8,000 7 or 8 9,000 9 or 10 10,000 11 or more 12,000 “Household” means the residential premises served by the customer’s meter. “Persons per household” includes only those persons currently physically residing at the premises and expected to reside there for the entire billing period. It shall be assumed that a particular customer’s household is comprised of two (2) persons unless the customer notifies the City of Schertz of a greater number of persons per household on a form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that such forms are mailed, otherwise provided, or made available to every residential customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such a form, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to go to the City of Schertz offices to complete and sign the form claiming more than two (2) persons per household. New customers may claim the number of persons per household at the time of applying for water service on the form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. When the number of persons per household increases so as to place the customer in a different allocation category, the customer may notify the City of Schertz on such form and the change will be implemented in the next practicable billing period. If the number of persons in a household is reduced, the customer shall notify the City of Schertz in writing within two (2) days. In prescribing the method for claiming more than two (2) persons per household, the Director of Public Works shall adopt methods to insure the accuracy of the claim. Any person who knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence falsely reports the number of persons in a household or fails to timely notify the City of Schertz of a reduction in the number of person in a household shall be fined not less than $200.00. Residential water customers shall pay the following surcharges: $2.00 for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. Surcharges shall be cumulative. Master-Metered Multi-Family Residential Customers The allocation to a customer billed from a master meter which jointly measures water to multiple permanent residential dwelling units (e.g., apartments, mobile homes) shall be allocated 6,000 gallons per month for each dwelling unit. It shall be assumed that such a customer’s meter serves two dwelling units unless the customer notifies the City of Schertz of a greater number on a form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that such forms are mailed, otherwise provided, or made available to every such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such a form, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to go to the City of Schertz offices to complete and sign the form claiming more than two (2) dwellings. A dwelling unit may be claimed under this provision whether it is occupied or not. New customers may claim only those occupying the dwelling unit at the time of applying for water service on the form prescribed by the Director of Public Works. If the number of dwelling units served by a master meter is reduced, the customer shall notify the City of Schertz in writing within two (2) days. In prescribing the method for claiming more than two (2) dwelling units, the Director of Public Works shall adopt methods to insure the accuracy of the claim. Any person who knowingly, recklessly, or with criminal negligence falsely reports the number of dwelling units served by a master meter or fails to timely notify the City of Schertz of a reduction in the number of person in a household shall be fined not less than $200.00. Customers billed from a master meter under this provision shall pay the following monthly surcharges: $2.00 for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. Surcharges shall be cumulative. Commercial Customers A monthly water usage allocation shall be established by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, for each nonresidential commercial customer other than an industrial customer who uses water for processing purposes. The non-residential customer’s allocation shall be approximately seventy-five percent (75%) of the customer’s usage for corresponding month’s billing period for the previous 12 months. If the customer’s billing history is shorter than 12 months, the monthly average for the period for which there is a record shall be used for any monthly period for which no history exists. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that notice of each non - residential customer’s allocation is mailed to such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such notice, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to contact the City of Schertz to determine the allocation. Upon request of the customer or at the initiative of the Director of Public Works, the allocation may be reduced or increased if, (1) the designated period does not accurately reflect the customer’s normal water usage, (2) one nonresidential customer agrees to transfer part of its allocation to another nonresidential customer, or (3) other objective evidence demonstrates that the designated allocation is inaccurate under present conditions. A customer may appeal an allocation established hereunder to the City Manager. Nonresidential commercial customers shall pay the following surcharges: $2.00 per thousand gallons for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $3.00 per thousand gallons for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $4.00 per thousand gallons for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $5.00 per thousand gallons for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. The surcharges shall be cumulative. As used herein, “block rate” means the charge to the customer per 1,000 gallons at the regular water rate schedule at the level of the customer’s allocation. Industrial Customers and Commercial Nurseries A monthly water usage allocation shall be established by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, for each industrial customer, which uses water for processing purposes. The industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries allocation shall be approximately ninety percent (90%) of the customer’s water usage baseline. Ninety (90) days after the initial imposition of the allocation for industrial customers and commercial nurseries , the industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries allocation shall be further reduced to 85% percent of the customer’s water usage baseline. The industrial customer’s and commercial nurseries water usage baseline will be computed on the average water usage for the 12 month period ending prior to the date of implementation of Stage 2 of the Plan. If the industrial water customer’s and commercial nurseries billing history is shorter than 12 months, the monthly average for the period for which there is a record shall be used for any monthly period for which no billing history exists. The Director of Public Works shall give his/her best effort to see that notice of each industrial customer and commercial nurseries allocation is mailed to such customer. If, however, a customer does not receive such notice, it shall be the customer’s responsibility to contact the City of Schertz to determine the allocation, and the allocation shall be fully effective notwithstanding the lack of receipt of written notice. Upon request of the customer or at the initiative of the Director of Public Works, the allocation may be reduced or increased, (1) if the designated period does not accurately reflect the customer’s normal water usage because the customer had shut down a major processing unit for repair or overhaul during the period, (2) the customer has added or is in the process of adding significant additional processing capacity, (3) the customer has shut down or significantly reduced the production of a major processing unit, (4) the customer has previously implemented significant permanent water conservation measures such that the ability to further reduce usage is limited, (5) the customer agrees to transfer part of its allocation to another industrial customer and commercial nurseries, or (6) if other objective evidence demonstrates that the designated allocation is inaccurate under present conditions. A customer may appeal an allocation established hereunder to the City Manager. Industrial customers and commercial nurseries shall pay the following surcharges: Customers whose allocation is 90% of their twelve month average. $ 2.00 per thousand gallons for the first 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 3.00 per thousand gallons for the second 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 4.00 per thousand gallons for the third 1,000 gallons over allocation. $ 5.00 per thousand gallons for each additional 1,000 gallons over allocation. The surcharges shall be cumulative. As used herein, “block rate” means the charge to the customer per 1,000 gallons at the regular water rate schedule at the level of the customer’s allocation. Wholesale Customers The provisions of this Plan shall apply to all customers utilizing water provided by the City on a wholesale basis. Every wholesale water contract entered into, renewed or modified after official adoption of this Plan shall include language relating to the City of Schertz Drought Contingency Plan and shall require the imposition of similar restrictions, surcharges or rationing measures on their customers. To the extent of its legal authority, the City of Schertz shall require its wholesale customers to implement outdoor watering restrictions similar to those of the City for each drought response stage or adopt the City of Schertz Drought Contingency Plan. The City requires that any contract for the resale of water furnished to wholesale water contractors shall contain a similar condition. In the event that the triggering criteria specified, the City Manager, or designee, is hereby authorized to implement allocation of water supplies on a pro rata basis to raw water and treated wholesale customers in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. The initiation of pro rata allocation preparations shall begin during Stage 3. A provision will be included in every wholesale water contract entered into or renewed after adoption of the Plan, including contract extensions, that in case of a shortage of water resulting from drought, the water to be distributed shall be divided in accordance with Texas Water Code §11.039. A wholesale treated water customer's monthly allocation shall be a percentage of the customer's water usage baseline. The percentage will be set by resolution of the City Council based on the Gonzales Underground Water Conservation District (GCUWCD) and Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation (SSLGC)’s allocation to the City and the Director of Public Works’ assessment of the severity of the water shortage condition and the need to curtail water diversions and deliveries and may be adjusted periodically by resolution of the City Council as conditions warrant. Once pro rata allocation is in effect, water diversions by deliveries to each wholesale treated water customer shall be limited to the allocation established for each month. During any period when pro rata allocation of available water supplies is in effect, wholesale customers shall pay the following surcharges on excess water consumption: • 1.25 times the normal water rate per unit in excess of the monthly allocation up through 5% above the monthly allocation. • 1.5 times the normal water rate in excess of the monthly allocation from 5% through 10% above the monthly allocation. • 1.75 times the normal water rate in excess of the monthly allocation from 10% through 15% above the monthly allocation. • 2.0 times the normal water rate more than 15% above the monthly allocation. Section XIII: Enforcement (a) No person shall knowingly or intentionally allow the use of water from the City of Schertz for residential, commercial, industrial, agricultural, governmental, or any other purpose in a manner contrary to any provision of this Plan, or in an amount in excess of that permitted by the drought response stage in effect at the time pursuant to action taken by the City Manager, or his/her designee, in accordance with provisions of this Plan. (b) Any person who violates this Plan is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction , shall be punished by a fine up to $200.00. Each day that one or more of the provisions in the Plan is violated shall constitute a separate offense. If a person is convicted of three or more distinct violations of this Plan, the Director of Public Works shall, upon due notice to the customer, be authorized to discontinue water service to the premises where such violations occur. Services discontinued under such circumstances shall be restored only upon payment of a re-connection charge, hereby established at $150.00, and any other costs incurred by the City of Schertz in discontinuing service. In addition, suitable assurance must be given to the Director of Public Works that the same action shall not be repeated while the Plan is in effect. Compliance with this Plan may also be sought through injunctive relief in the district court. (c) Any person, including a person classified as a water customer of the City of Schertz, in apparent control of the property where a violation occurs or originates shall be presumed to be the violator, and proof that the violation occurred on the person’s property shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that the person in apparent control of the property committed the violation, but any such person shall have the right to show that he/she did not commit the violation. Parents shall be presumed to be responsible for violations of their minor children and proof that a violation, committed by a child, occurred on property within the parents’ control shall constitute a rebuttable presumption that the parent committed the violation, but any such parent may be excused if he/she proves that he/she had previously directed the child not to use the water as it was used in violation of this Plan and that the parent could not have reasonably known of the violation. (d) Any police officer, code enforcement officer, or other City of Schertz employee designated by the Director of Public Works, may issue a citation to a person he/she reasonably believes to be in violation of this Ordinance. The citation shall be prepared in duplicate and shall contain the name and address of the alleged violator, if known, the offense charged, and shall direct him/her to appear in the municipal court on or before the 14th day following the date the citation was issued. The alleged violator shall be served a copy of the citation. Service of the citation shall be complete upon delivery of the citation to the alleged violator, to an agent or employee of a violator, or to a person over 14 years of age who is a member of the violator’s immediate family or is a resident of the violator’s residence. The alleged violator shall appear in municipal court to enter a plea of guilty or not guilty for the violation of this Plan. If the alleged violator fails to appear in municipal court, a warrant for his/her arrest may be issued. A summons to appear may be issued in lieu of an arrest warrant. These cases shall be expedited and given preferential setting in municipal court before all other cases. Section XIV: Variances The City Manager, or his/her designee, may, in writing, grant temporary variance for existing water uses otherwise prohibited under this Plan if it is determined that failure to grant such variance would cause an emergency condition adversely affecting the health, sanitation, or fire protection for the public or the person requesting such variance and if one or more of the following conditions are met: (a) Compliance with this Plan cannot be technically accomplished during the duration of the water supply shortage or other condition for which the Plan is in effect. (b) Alternative methods can be implemented which will achieve the same level of reduction in water use. Persons requesting an exemption from the provisions of this Ordinance shall file a petition for variance with the City of Schertz within 5 days after the Plan or a particular drought response stage has been invoked. All petitions for variances shall be reviewed by the Director of Public Works, or his/her designee, and shall include the following: (a) Name and address of the petitioner(s). (b) Purpose of water use. (c) Specific provision(s) of the Plan from which the petitioner is requesting relief. (d) Detailed statement as to how the specific provision of the Plan adversely affects the petitioner or what damage or harm will occur to the petitioner or others if petitioner complies with this Ordinance. (e) Description of the relief requested. (f) Period of time for which the variance is sought. (g) Alternative water use restrictions or other measures the petitioner is taking or proposes to take to meet the intent of this Plan and the compliance date. (h) Other pertinent information. Variances granted by the City of Schertz shall be subject to the following conditions, unless waived or modified by the City Manager or his/her designee: (a) Variances granted shall include an acceptable timetable for compliance. (b) Variances granted shall expire when the Plan is no longer in effect, unless the petitioner has failed to meet specified requirements. No variance shall be retroactive or otherwise justify any violation of this Plan occurring prior to the issuance of the variance. Section XV: Severability It is hereby declared to be the intention of the City of Schertz that the sections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, and phrases of this Plan are severable and, if any phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section of the Plan shall be declared unconstitutional by the valid judgment or decree of any court of competent jurisdiction, such unconstitutionality shall not affect any of the remaining phrases, clauses, sentences, paragraphs, and sections of the Plan, since the same would not have been enacted by the City of Schertz without the incorporation into the Plan of any such unconstitutional phrase, clause, sentence, paragraph, or section. Agenda No. 16.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:City Secretary Subject:Workshop Discussion on the Integration of Space Force into Veterans Memorial Plaza (S.Gonzalez/L.Shrum) BACKGROUND The Schertz Veterans Memorial Plaza was officially dedicated to the city on November 11, 2014 after an extensive fundraising effort by a citizens' committee.  At the time, there were only 5 branches of the military and the traditional pentagon shape was chosen for the plaza design.  In 2019, the Space Force Branch was created and thus there is a need to incorporate the new branch permanently into the plaza.  Currently, a temporary freestanding flag pole for the Space Force is brought into the plaza for the Memorial Day and Veterans Day ceremonies, respectively.   City staff began working with the landscape architect firm, LUCK Design Group, to facilitate incorporating the Space Force Branch into the plaza in a meaningful and appropriate way.  The design challenge of incorporating 6 branches into a pentagon shape and maintaining a balanced plaza that is pleasing to the eye, was difficult, and various iterations were discussed.  City staff did not want to eliminate the work that was done by the citizen committee with the 5-point pentagon and 5-point star design in the pavers, so it was ultimately decided the best course of action was to add an equivalent break on each side of the pentagon to match the two sides that already had a break with a sidewalk entrance.  This way, all sides of the pentagon would have an equidistant break in the middle of the side and two additional monuments would be added instead of just 1 monument for Space Force, so there will now be 8 granite monuments with 8 flags immediately behind each monument. City staff discussed the design proposal with two different citizen groups to gather feedback - The Chamber Military Affairs Committee (MAC) at their meeting on November 6, 2024 and the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board at their meeting on November 18, 2024.  Both groups had positive feedback on the proposed design and the MAC Committee assisted city staff with appropriate order and wording of monuments.  The original order discussed was: 1. POW/MIA 2. Army 3. Navy 4. Marine Corps 5. Air Force 6. Space Force 7. Coast Guard 8. Gold Star After having these discussions with the MAC Committee, staff realized that the POW/MIA flag was already in the center of the plaza and moving that flag out of the center, would then cause an imbalance in the centered flags in the middle of the pentagon.  Thus, city staff is proposing that we incorporate a monument and flag for Purple Heart recipients. The new proposed order is:  1. Army 2. Navy 3. Marine Corps 4. Air Force 5. Space Force 6. Coast Guard 7. Purple Heart 8. Gold Star GOAL Incorporate the Space Force Branch into the Veterans Memorial Plaza in a way that makes sense for the design of the plaza. COMMUNITY BENEFIT The Schertz Veterans Memorial Plaza honors the men and women who serve or have served in the Armed Forces of the United States of America - past, present, and future.  The community regards veterans in high esteem and hosts Memorial Day and Veterans Day ceremonies at the plaza, respectively, as well as occasional JROTC activities.    SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Approval of the proposed design to incorporate the Space Force branch into the Schertz Veterans Memorial Plaza. RECOMMENDATION Approval of the proposed design to incorporate the Space Force branch into the Schertz Veterans Memorial Plaza. Attachments Veterans Plaza Space Force Addition presentation  VETERANS MEMORIAL PLAZA SPACE FORCE ADDITION Lauren Shrum| D irector | Parks , Recreation and Community Services City Council Meeting – January 21, 2025 Landscape Architect: •LUCK Design Team Focus Groups: •The Chamber Military Affairs Committee (MAC) – November 6, 2024 •Parks & Recreation Advisory Board – November 18, 2024 •Ruth Tienor & Original Committee – via emails •City Council – January 21, 2025 1.Army 2.Navy 3.Marine Corps 4.Air Force 5.Space Force 6.Coast Guard 7.Purple Heart 8.Gold Star 3 COST AND TIMELINE Estimated cost is $60,000 •Funded through Parks General Fund •Granite memorials (3 pedestal stones, inset medallions, engraving, freight) - $50,000 •Pink granite from Vermillion Bay, Ontario, Canada •Concrete, 3 additional flag poles and flags - $10,000 Timeline: 17 weeks •Pushing for Completion by Memorial Day 2025 4 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS 5 Agenda No. 17.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Executive Team Subject:Workshop Discussion on the upcoming Request For Proposal for Municipal Solid Waste (S.Williams/S.Gonzalez) BACKGROUND The City of Schertz has a franchise agreement with Republic Services to provide the collection, hauling and disposal of municipal solid waste. The City of Schertz will be issuing a Request for Proposal (RFP) for this service at the beginning of February, as the current agreement ends on June 30, 2025. This workshop discussion will review the history of solid waste services in Schertz, an overview of what services are currently provided, the timeline of the RFP process and what Council can expect going forward. Attachments City Council Presentation Slides  Workshop Discussion: Upcoming Request for Proposal for Municipal Solid Waste City Council Meeting, February 4, 2025 Sarah Gonzalez | Assistant City Manager WORKSHOP OVERVIEW •History of Solid Waste Services •Overview of services currently provide •RFP Process •Communication/Next Steps 2 History •2001 – Established renewing franchise relationship with Bexar Waste •Ordinance Nos 01-F-2, 03-F-22, 07-F-07, and 11-F-35 •2013 – Awarded a seven-year franchise agreement to Bexar Waste •Ordinance No. 13-F-03 •2015 – Awarded a ten-year franchise agreement to Bexar Waste •Ordinance No. 15-F-18 •2017 – Bexar Waste sold to Republic Services; Request made to Council to approve assignment of the City’s solid waste franchise agreement to Republic Services •Resolution 17-R-41 •2017 – Present Day – Republic Services has been provider; operating under existing, legacy contract •June 30, 2025 – Contract expires 3 Current Services Provided - Residential 4 •Zone 1 – approx. 5,200 accounts •Solid Waste •Once a week pick-up •96-gallon poly-cart provided to customer •Recycle •Once a week pick-up •18-gallon bin provided to customer •Zone 2 – Approx. 9,300 accounts •Solid Waste •Twice a week pick-up •Hand collect and/or customer provides small container (32 gallon or less) •Recycle •Once a week pick-up on second day •18-gallon bin provided to customer 2 1 1 Current Services Provided - Residential •All Accounts Receive: •Brush/Bulk Pick-Up – 12 times per calendar year •Spring and Fall Clean-Ups •16 Days •Temporary Collection Point at 125 Pecan Drive •Hazardous Items/Tires Drop Off on last weekend 5 Current Services Provided - Commercial •All Accounts Option to Receive: •Roll-offs •Dumpsters •Front-End Loaders •Recycle (non-exclusive) 6 Residential Rates 7 •No rate change in 7 years RFP Process •Working with Solid Waste Specialists: •Firm Expertise: Specializes in assisting cities in Texas, Oklahoma, and Arkansas with solid waste service RFPs. •Principals: •Lynn Lantrip: 40 years in municipal services with a large collection firm. •Richard Rozier: Former Mayor of DeSoto, TX; current Tax Assessor-Collector for Ellis County. •George Wheatley: Former Mayor of Magnolia, AR; former long-time employee of a large collection firm.•Milestone: Serving the City of Schertz marks the firm’s 25th engagement since starting 7 years ago. 8 RFP Process & Key Dates January 21, 2025 •Conducted meeting with city staff to gather information and receive direction on preparation of the RFP and Contract February 5, 2025 •Publish RFP February 11, 2025 •Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference March 5, 2025 •RFP submittals due April 1, 2025 •Award of new contract by City Council July 1, 2025 •New solid waste services contract begins 9 Residential Collection Options – Solid Waste Solid Waste Options: •Once a week collection in 96-gallon cart •Twice a week collection in a 96-gallon cart Recycling Options •Once a week collection in 96-gallon cart •Every Other Week collection in a 96-gallon cart Brush & Bulk Options •Once a week collection of 3 cubic yards •Every Other Week collection of 3 cubic yards Optional On Call Household Hazardous Waste Collection All options will allow for unusual accumulation collection (special collection larger than requirements for bulk) for a predetermined fee. 10 Commercial and Roll-Off Collection No large changes •Rates to be submitted based on size of container and frequency of collection (same as current contract) •Facility services for City to continue, free of charge •New containers will be required 11 General Provisions & Requirements •All poly-carts provided by the Contractor will be new •Equipment to be used by the Contractor will be no older than four-years at the start of the contract •Liquidated Damages to be included to allow the City to charge vendor for specific failures •GPS-tracking software and camera equipment will be required of all firms submitting an RFP •Reports will be required to be sent to the City daily 12 Communication/Next Steps •Next Steps •Comprehensive Trash Campaign 13 COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS 14 Agenda No. 18.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Engineering Subject:Monthly Update - Major Projects In Progress/CIP (B.James/K.Woodlee) Attachments 2-4-25 Council Update  Informational Only CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM City Council Meeting: February 4, 2025 Department: City Manager Subject: Update on Major Projects in Progress Background This is the monthly update on large projects that are in progress or in the planning process. This update is being provided so Council will be up to date on the progress of these large projects. If Council desires more information on any project or on projects not on this list, please reach out to staff and that information will be provided. Facilities Projects: 1. Fleet Building Parking Lot Project Description – Pave the open grassy area located at 27 Commercial Place o Project Status: Site Plan Development and Construction Design o Projected Completion: To be determined o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: To be determined Project Update: No change from previous update. The Site Plan process is nearing completion. The next step will be the submittal of construction plans for permitting. 2. Digital Sign Replacement in Front of City Hall Project Description- Replacement of the broken electronic marquee sign that sits in front of City Hall o Project Status: Pending permits filed by Ezzi Signs o Projected Completion: TBD o Project Cost: $78,000 o Contractor: Ezzi Signs, Inc Project Update: Contractor came out to measure and mark the new location of the sign. Electrical contract completed removing and moving the power supply to the new location of the sign. Installation of the sign is scheduled to take place during the week of January 27th-31st. Drainage Projects: 1. FM 78 South Channel Silt Removal Project Description – Silt removal for the existing FM 78 South Drainage channel to include permitting, easement acquisition and construction. o Project Status: Easement Acquisition o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: Design $32,100, Drainage Report $4,600 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers, Inc. o Contractor: TBD Project Update: Design of the project is complete and Unintech continues to work on acquiring necessary easements for the project. After easements are acquired, the project will be rebid, and construction will proceed. Water and Wastewater Projects: 1. Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Interceptor Main and Lift Station Project Description – Design and construction of a sanitary sewer system to collect and convey wastewater to the future CCMA water reclamation plant off Trainer Hale Road in Southern Schertz. The system will consist of approximately 19,000 linear feet of 30” gravity wastewater line running generally along Woman Hollering Creek from the existing Sedona lift station on FM 1518 to a new lift station on IH 10 and approximately 6,000 feet of force main from the lift station to CCMA plant. It will also include an additional 18” gravity line approximately 1,500 feet in length that will first serve the Hallie’s Cove Subdivision. The system is necessary for the new CCMA plant to begin operation and to allow the existing Woman Hollering Lift Station at Sedona to be taken out of service. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Winter 2025 o Project Cost: Engineering/Design $1,187,594, Land purchases, ROW, legal and advertising $700,810, Construction $11,100,000, totaling $12,988,404 o Design Engineer: Cobb Fendley & Associates, Inc. o Owner’s Representative: AGCM, Inc. o Contractor: Thalle Construction Co, Inc. Project Update: The project is nearing completion. Staff continues to work with the contractor, design professionals, and CPS to adjust electrical equipment that needs to be elevated further than installed due to the location within the area of special flood hazard (100-year floodplain). Once the adjustments are made, further testing will take place and if successful, the contractor will move to transfer flow of actual wastewater from the Sedona lift station to the Woman Hollering Lift Station. Staff and the contractor will work closely with CCMA as this will also mark the startup of the CCMA South Water Reclamation Plant. It is expected to have the plant operational in February 2025. 2. Riata Lift Station Relocation Project Description – Relocation of the Riata Lift Station ahead of TxDOT’s IH 35 NEX project to remove it from conflict with the proposed highway improvements. The design phase included identification of a new site for the list station, design of new lift station and desi gn of the abandonment of the existing lift station. Property and easement acquisitions were required. The new lift station is needed to maintain sewer services. o Project Status: Begin Construction 4th Quarter of 2024. o Projected Completion: Summer 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Acquisition of easements and existing lift station $478,000; Construction: $2,545,375 o Consultant: Utility Engineering Group, PLLC o Contractor: Keystone Construction o Project Update: Keystone continues construction of the lift station. Material submittals are continuing to be reviewed by UEG and city staff. Long lead items like electrical equipment are being reviewed, approved, and ordered as soon as possible to avoid and/or minimize project delays. Installation of the relocated gravity main to the lift station has begun. 3. FM 1518 Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT FM 1518 Improvement Project. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: The City’s utility relocation portion of the project is expected to be completed in the summer of 2025. o Project Cost: Design NTE $980,000, Construction Joint Bid $8,986,837/Aztec 16” Line $884,270 o Consultant: Halff Associates o Contractor: SER Construction Partners (TxDOT’s General Contractor)/Qro Mex Construction (Aztec 16” Line) Project Update: SER continues the installation of water and sewer as part of the joint bid work. They are installing water near the FM 1518 CCMA lift station and continuing north toward FM 78. CC Carlton and Capital Excavation are working to complete water line installations from the Founders School to the south limits of Crossvine. Once this is installed, SER can complete the abandonment of the old 12” water line along this section of FM 1518. Qro Mex has completed the bore under the creek and Aztec Lane. They have also completed installation of the section of line near the tie-in point along FM 78. Barring any further delays with the creek crossing, Qro Mex should be substantially complete in February 2025. This will allow SER to complete all their work for the City relocations up to the FM 1518/FM 78 intersection. 4. Corbett Ground Storage Tank Project Description – Construction of a new 3-million-gallon Ground Storage Tank (GST). The GST will be used to fill the existing Corbett Elevated Storage Tank and provide additional water storage capacity. This new GST will receive water directly from the Schertz Seguin Local Government Corporation. o Project Status: Construction Phase o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: Design $466,265, Construction $7,360,054 o Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineers o Contractor: Pesado Construction Co. Project Update: Pesado is just about complete with electrical conduit installation. The cold weather delayed scheduled concrete pours, but the overall project schedule is not impacted. As soon as the main drain from the tank is completed, the initial filling of the storage tank will be finally scheduled. The funds from the $3.5 million grant from the EPA awarded for this project have been received by the City. 5. Water Loop Lines Project Description – Install 12” water main lines to provide a looped distribution system from Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin and Pfeil Road to N Graytown Road. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Spring 2026 o Project Cost: Design NTE $200,000, Construction Estimate $4,400,000 Project Update: Unintech and their subconsultant is beginning to make offers to landowners for needed easements for construction and operation of the lines. Once all easements have been acquired the project will be bid and proceed into construction. 6. IH 35 NEX-North Utility Relocations Project Description – Relocation of water and sewer utilities to avoid conflicts as part of the TxDOT IH 35 NEX project. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Joint Bid Construction is planned for End of 2026 o Project Cost: Design & Easement Acquisition Services - $1,250,000 o Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: No significant change from previous update - Halff is continuing completion of the sewer design of the project. This will be bid separately from the water relocations which will be joint bid with the highway construction efforts. Halff is working to secure the necessary easements for the sewer installation. Once all easements have been acquired the project will be bid and proceed to construction. Staff has also been working with TXDOT and the utility coordinators to complete the relocation agreements that need to be in place for the City to be reimbursed by TxDOT for these relocations associated with an interstate highway project. Street Projects: 1. Main Street Improvements Project Project Description – The project will improve sidewalks, provide street lighting, way-finding signage, landscaping, utility relocations, and architectural elements such as decorative concrete, decorative lighting, screening, and area signage. This project will also replace aging water and sanitary sewer mains and reconstruct the street with a new, stronger pavement section. Additionally, Lindbergh between Main and Exchange will be reconstructed. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: Fall 2027 o Project Cost: Design NTE $2,173,905, Construction $24,600,000 o Consultant: Kimley- Horn Associates Project Update: We’re continuing to coordinate with GVEC on potential utility conflicts. GVEC is very close to having their 60% plans completed, which also us to finish out water and sewer replacement plans. Staff expects to have the water and sewer line replacement bid this Spring, with construction starting this Summer. GVEC expects to start doing some overhead line replacement/upgrading along Exchange Avenue this Summer. These replacements/upgrades are necessary for the planned removal of all the overhead lines in Main Street. 2. Lookout Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project involves reconstruction of Lookout Road from Schertz Parkway to Doerr Lane. A traffic signal at the Lookout Road/Schertz Parkway intersection will also be installed. The project also includes the replacement and upsizing the existing sanitary sewer main in Lookout Road from Doerr Lane to Schertz Parkway. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: January 2026 o Project Cost: Design $571,000 ($20,000 from Selma), Construction estimate $6,738,092 ($100,000 from Selma) o Design Consultant: Halff Associates Project Update: Right-of-way documents have been created, and Staff is working with the consultant to acquire the right-of-way parcels for the widening at the Schertz Parkway and Doerr Lane intersections. 3. Lower Seguin Road Reconstruction Project Description – The project includes the development of a preliminary design and secure environmental clearance for a 2.9-mile segment of Lower Seguin Road to widen and improve the street to the section identified in the Master Thoroughfare Plan. The results of this project will be used to acquire needed right-of-way; develop final construction plans; and secure federal funding to assist with construction costs. o Project Status: Design o Projected Completion: January 2027 o Project Cost: Preliminary Design $985,000 o Consultant: Halff & Associates Project Update: Staff and the consultant continue having meetings with Randolph staff to coordinate on the project. Most recently, we met with “security forces” on the base to inform them of the project and gain insight into the south gate operations. The meeting was very productive and provided us with important information on how the future construction activity should be scheduled/coordinated with base activities. We have also met recently with the civil engineering and environmental group to help facilitate the final data gathering needed to complete the environmental assessment for the project. The consultant continues to refine the preliminary plans to provide more details, incorporate feedback from the base, and reduce the right-of-way needs for the project. This month, the final design Task Order will be presented to Council for approval. The project is still on schedule to be ready to apply for the Federal funding for construction in June of this year. 4. 2024 SPAM Resurfacing and Rehabilitation Project Description – The project includes the performance of prep work (base repairs, crack sealing, level up, etc.) and application of a slurry seal to the surface of various streets in the City. Work on other streets includes removal of existing asphalt surface; cement stabilization of base material; and application of a new layer of asphalt on street surface for other various City streets. PCI data was used to select the streets in the project. o Project Status: Design and Construction o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: $3,220,000 (estimated total) o Design Consultant: Kimley-Horn Associates o Contractor: R.L. Jones LP (Resurfacing Project) Project Update: Prep work continues in the Kensington Ranch and Savannah Bluff areas. The recent cold weather has caused some delays in getting the work completed. The contractor expects to have this prep work completed by early February and will then start doing prep work in other project areas. 5. Buffalo Valley South Resurfacing and Rehabilitation and Utility Replacements Project Description – Water and sanitary sewer main replacements and street rehabilitation of Buffalo Valley South, specifically Mill Street, 1st St, 2nd St, Bowman St, Lee St, Church St, Zuehl St, and Wuest. PCI data was used to select the streets in the project. Project will be funded with a combination of SPAM funding (for the street rehabilitation) and ARP funding for the utility replacement. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Design Summer 2024; Construction Fall 2025 o Project Cost: $5,300,000 (estimated total) o Design Consultant: Unintech Consulting Engineering o Contractor: E-Z Bel Construction, LLC Project Update: The contractor plans to start construction on March 17th. We will be holding a pre- construction meeting with the contractor in mid-February. Staff will also be doing some public outreach to the neighborhood, informing them of the project and the anticipated construction start. Parks & Recreation Projects: 1. Parks, Recreation, Open Space, and Trails Master Plan (PROST) Project Description – As a continuation of the Comprehensive Plan, staff and consultants are embarking on a planning process to create a 10-year vision for the parks & recreation system. The process includes inventory and analysis of the current system, public input via stakeholder meetings and social pinpoint feedback site, Parks & Recreation Advisory Board meetings check-ins, and a statistically valid survey. o Project Status: Completion o Projected Completion: December 2024 o Project Cost: $85,000 (NTE) o Contractor: Freese & Nichols Project Update: The final plan version was approved by the Parks & Recreation Advisory Board at their special-called meeting on October 21. The final plan version was approved by the Planning and Zoning Commission on December 4. The final plan was approved by City Council at the December 17 meeting. 2. Schertz Soccer Complex Irrigation Water Storage Project Project Description – Upgrading electrical components, upsizing well pump and piping, and adding storage capacity for irrigation of the Schertz Soccer Complex. o Project Status: Bidding Phase III o Projected Completion: Summer 2025 o Project Cost: $107,036.90 o Consultant: Unintech Engineering o Contractor: TBD Project Update: The project was put back out to bid and received one qualified bid. The bid will be presented to council for approval at a future meeting in February. 3. Schertz Soccer Complex Lighting Project Project Description – Adding lights and accompanying infrastructure to Fields 3-12. Replacing metal halide lighting on Fields 1 and 2 with upgraded LED lighting for energy efficiency and color consistency. o Project Status: Construction o Projected Completion: Spring 2025 o Project Cost: $1,843,000 (estimated total) o Contractor: Musco Lighting w/subcontractor Master’s Electrical Project Update: Construction of light poles and installation of control cabinets has been completed. Trenching is now underway to connect all light poles to power. New conduit runs to Field 12 will start the week of January 27. Project is on track to be completed by February 14 so the spring season can begin on March 1. I.T. Projects: 1. Asset Management- Work Order System – Open Gov Project Description- Replace the current work order and asset management systems o Project Status: In progress o Projected Completion: Fall 2025 o Project Cost: Approximately $470,000 o Contractor: Open Gov Project Update: The staff successfully completed the startup workshop January 21-23. Staff must complete assigned spreadsheets provided by OpenGov with asset information, workflow information, labor, resources, etc. This information will be built into the software system. There are weekly check-in sessions that occur on Fridays to ensure we stay on track with assignments given. Studies and Plans: 1. Water and Wastewater Master Plan Update and Impact Fee Study Project Description – Collect, review data from the City and provide updated data for the Land Use Plan, Water and Wastewater System Model, Master Plan, CIP, Water/Wastewater Impact Fees, and Flow monitoring. o Project Status: Study o Projected Completion: Spring 2025 o Project Cost: $500,000 o Consultant: Lockwood, Andrews & Newnam Project Update: A draft of the Water and Wastewater Master Plan, Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plan, and Impact Fee Update Report was provided to City Council in January as an informational item. Workshops and Hearings were held with the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee in January and comments are being drafted as a result of those meetings. Staff also had a presentation and conversation with the Schertz Economic Development Corporation Board to gather feedback to be shared with Council. Staff and LAN are putting together the CIAC comments and other feedback to present to Council. In accordance with Texas Local Government Code Chapter 395, a resolution is being proposed for action at the February 4, 2025, regular Council meeting for a date to be set for a public hearing of the Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and Impact Fee Updates. At the subsequent public hearing, Council will consider adoption of the plans and rates. TxDOT Roadway Projects: Note: If links do not work, please contact engineering@schertz.com 1. FM 1103 Improvement Project: Construction officially began in November 2022 and was originally expected to be complete in fall 2026. Minor progress is being made on the roadway while utility relocation continues. General project updates are available by signing up at this link: FM 1103 Construction Newsletter 2. FM 1518 Improvement Project: SER Construction, LLC, formally began construction on April 9, 2024. The contractor has leased property owned by the City on Schaefer Road to stage construction activities. The first few months of the project will be mainly underground utility construction and will mostly take place outside travel lanes. While there may be some delays, major traffic disruptions should not be experienced much during this phase of the project. The project is currently anticipated to be completed in 2028. Updates regarding the FM 1518 project are available by visiting and subscribing at the following link: FM 1518 Expansion 3. IH-35 NEX (I-410 South to FM 1103): The central segment of the I-35 Northeast Expansion project continues with Alamo NEX Construction handling the design-build project. The central section runs from 410 N to FM 3009. Utility coordination work for the northern segment of the project is underway. TxDOT consultants have met with Public Works and Engineering Staff to begin establishing relocation needs. The City will be reimbursed for the costs of all relocations needed except for any upsizing or improvements above current conditions. Updates about the project can be obtained by signing up at the following link: I 35 NEX Project Updates 4. IH-10 Graytown Road to Guadalupe County Line: Work for the widening of the main lanes and utility relocations continues. Work on the FM 1518 bridge over IH 10 continues and will involve numerous episodes of the rerouting of traffic including shifting lanes and detours as necessary. Updates regarding the IH 10 project are available by signing up at the following link: IH 10 Expansion Information Agenda No. 19.   CITY COUNCIL MEMORANDUM    City Council Meeting:February 04, 2025 Department:Facility & Fleet Subject:Update on EcoBrite Cleaning Contract Changes BACKGROUND On January 22, 2025, EcoBrite, the current cleaning contractor, informed the City that the company is unable to meet the expectations outlined in the scope of work for cleaning services for the City of Schertz. On January 28, EcoBrite plans to submit a request to terminate their services, providing the City with a 30-day notice. Facilities Services Staff is working with the Purchasing Department to issue a new RFP.