Loading...
PZ and CIAC 03-05-2025 Agenda with Associated Documents          MEETING AGENDA Schertz Capital Improvement Advisory Committee AND Planning & Zoning Commission March 5, 2025                                   HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA WEDNESDAY, MARCH 5, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. The Capital Improvement Advisory Committee and the Planning and Zoning Commission will hold this meeting at 6:00p.m., Wednesday, March 5, 2025, at the City Council Chambers. In lieu of attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live stream on the City's YouTube Channel.        1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Committee of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.CONSENT AGENDA:     A.Minutes for the January 22, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting.     5.ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING      Planning & Zoning                                   March 5, 2025 Page 1 of 3  2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.CONSENT AGENDA:     A.Minutes for the February 5, 2025,  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.     5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.      A.PLZC20250032 - Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from Single-Family Residential District (R-2) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as 305 Aviation Avenue, more specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 174165, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas   B.PLUDC20250035 - Conduct a public hearing, workshop and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change.   6.ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION      A.PLUDC20250001 - WITHDRAWN Consider and take possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change, and Article 5, Section 21.5.7. - Dimensional and Developmental Standards.- No Action to Occur   7.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:     A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda      B.Announcements by Commissioners  City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended      C.Announcements by City Staff.  City and community events attended and to be attended.      8.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR      Planning & Zoning                                   March 5, 2025 Page 2 of 3  A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update     9.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING      CERTIFICATION I, Daisy Marquez, Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 27th day of February, 2025 at 3:30 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code.  Daisy Marquez, Planner   I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on _____day of _______________, 2025. _______________title:_____________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619-1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.  Planning & Zoning                                   March 5, 2025 Page 3 of 3  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Capital Improvement Advisory Committee PREPARED BY:Emily Delgado, Planning Manager SUBJECT:Minutes for the January 22, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting.   GENERAL INFORMATION Minutes for the January 22, 2025 Capital Improvement Advisory Committee Meeting. STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of the minutes as drafted.  Attachments Draft minutes for the January 22, 2025 CIAC Meeting  D R A F T CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES January 22, 2025 The Schertz Capital Improvement Advisory Committee convened on January 22, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Tamara Brown, Commissioner; John Carbon, Commissioner; Clayton Wallace, Commissioner; Bryan Jones, Commissioner; Mark Penshorn, Commissioner Absent: Roderick Hector, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner Staff present: Brian James, Deputy City Manager Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Development Larry Busch, Public Works Director Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer Daisy Marquez, Planner Sarah Rodriguez, Administrative Assistant 1. CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Chairman Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:25 pm. 2. SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Commissioner Wallace was seated as alternate. 3. HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. No one spoke. 4. PUBLIC HEARING: A. Hold a public hearing for a presentation, discussion, and possible action to approve a recommendation regarding an update to the City of Schertz Water and Wastewater Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvements Plans, and Impact Fees to be assessed. Mrs. Woodlee provided a presentation. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:59 pm No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:59 pm. Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace, seconded by Commissioner Tamara Brown to recommend approval of City of Schertz Water and Wastewater Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and Impact Fees to be assessed at the maximum amount with phasing as proposed by staff and effective date determined by City Council to City Council. Vice Chairman Braud voted nay because they want the implementation of the maximum fees to be set with City Council adoption without a phasing period. Vote: 6- 1 Passed NAY: Vice Chairman Richard Braud 5 . ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING Chairman Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 7:50 pm. ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:Minutes for the February 5, 2025,  Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting.   Attachments Minutes for the February 5 2025 Regular Meeting  D R A F T PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES February 5, 2025 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on February 5, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Roderick Hector, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; Tamara Brown, Commissioner; Clayton Wallace, Commissioner Absent: John Carbon, Commissioner Staff present: Brian James, Deputy City Manager; Lesa Wood, Director of Planning & Community Development; Emily Delgado, Planning Manager; Samuel Haas, Senior Planner; Daisy Marquez, Planner; William Willingham, Planner; Sarah Rodriguez, Administrative Assistant              1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.   2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Commissioner Clayton Wallace was seated as the alternate.   3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. There were no residents who spoke.   4.CONSENT AGENDA:   A.Minutes for the January 22, 2025, Special Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting.      Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to approve, seconded by Commissioner Patrick McMaster  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   5.PUBLIC HEARING: 5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests, specific use permit requests, and Unified Development Code Amendments within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.   A.PLSPU20240273 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a Specific Use Permit request to allow Automobile Repairs and Service, Major in General Business District (GB), on approximately 0.4 acres of land, more specifically known as a portion of Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 121092, generally located 1,092 feet southwest of the intersection of IH-35 N Access Road and FM 1103, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas. Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLSPU20240273. The applicant spoke, Sergio Santa Cruz, 1017 Rigsby, San Antonio, TX. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:13 P.M. There were no residents who spoke Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:14 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval with conditions, as presented by staff, to City Council, seconded by Commissioner Patrick McMaster  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   B.PLZC20240317 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 4.3 acres of land from Manufacturing – Light District (M-1) and Single-Family Residential District (R-6) to General Business District (GB) known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas Mr. Haas gave a presentation on PLZC20240317. The applicant spoke, Jay Brown 7444 FM 482 & Trey Wyatt 510 Lancelot Way. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:27 P.M. Pedro Montalvo, 7514 FM 482 Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:32 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to recommend approval to the City Council, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   C.PLSPU20240323 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request for    C.PLSPU20240323 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a Nursery, Major on approximately 4.3 acres of land known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas Mr. Haas gave a presentation on PLSPU20240323. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:41 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:42 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval with conditions, as presented by staff, to City Council, seconded by Commissioner Roderick Hector  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   D.PLUDC20250001 - Conduct a public hearing, workshop and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change, and Article 5, Section 21.5.7. - Dimensional and Developmental Standards. Mr. Haas gave a presentation on PLUDC20250001. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:51 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed out the Public Hearing at 6:52 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to postpone to a future meeting with date to be determined, seconded by Commissioner Clayton Wallace  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   6.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:   A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda No requests were made.   B.Announcements by Commissioners City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended No announcements were made.   C.Announcements by City Staff. City and community events attended and to be attended. No announcements were made.   7.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update      8.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING Chairman Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 6:54 P.M.   ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 5 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:PLZC20250032 - Conduct a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 0.4 acres of land from Single-Family Residential District (R-2) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as 305 Aviation Avenue, more specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 174165, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas BACKGROUND The applicant is requesting to rezone approximately 0.4 acres from Single-Family Residential District (R-2) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6). It is currently one platted lot that is part of the Aviation Heights Subdivision, specifically Lot 61, Block 24, with no existing structure on the property. The subject property has direct frontage on Aviation Heights, a local road, and is within the 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone. On February 19, 2025, twenty-seven (27) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property and the Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District. At the time of the staff report, zero (0) responses in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and three (3) responses in opposition have been received. A public hearing notice will be published in the "San Antonio Express" prior to the City Council Meeting. Additionally, the applicant placed a notification sign on the subject property.  The subject property is located within the Aviation Heights Subdivision, one of the oldest subdivisions in Schertz. A Replat was recorded in 2019 to combine five (5) lots to create Lot 61, Block 24 (the subject property). The property is currently zoned Single-Family Residential District (R-2), but the applicant is requesting Single-Family Residential District (R-6) to split the lot into two lots and build two single-family homes. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Single Family Residence/ Vacant - Undeveloped Proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-6)Single Family Residence Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Open Space/ Single-Family Residence South Public Right-of-Way, Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Aviation Ave/ Single-Family Residences East Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Single-Family Residences West Single-Family Residential District (R-2)Single-Family Residences    Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size and Dimensions Minimum Yard Setback Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code Zoning District Area Sqft Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Max Impervious Coverage R-2 Single-Family Residential District 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35'50% R-6 Single-Family Residential District 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35'50%   GOAL The proposed zone change is for approximately 0.4 acres of land to Single-Family Residential District (R-6). Per the letter of intent submitted with the application, the applicant would like to split the lot to build two homes. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, Staff refers to the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; The subject property is designated as Complete Neighborhood in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan-Future Land Use Map. The Complete Neighborhood land use designation is intended for a mixture of housing options with supporting land uses, such as neighborhood commercial. When considering the existing land uses, the subject property is surrounded by single-family residences and the applicant is also proposing single-family residences. The proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-6) meets the intent of the Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation and implements the Policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan due to the compatibility with the existing land uses and existing zoning district site dimensional requirements. 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. As part of promoting health, safety, and welfare, the City should encourage development compatible with surrounding uses utilizing standards and transitional uses to alleviate negative impacts. The subject property is surrounded by residences and the applicant is proposing a residential use. The uses permitted within Single-Family Residential District (R-2) are also allowed within Single-Family Residential District (R-6). 3. Whether other uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area. The subject property is part of one of the oldest subdivisions within the City of Schertz. Although residential properties within Aviation Heights are zoned Single-Family Residential District (R-2), they may meet the dimensional requirements of other zoning districts. The applicant is proposing Single-Family Residential District (R-6), which would result in the same uses that are permitted within Single-Family Residential District (R-2). 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police have been notified of the zone change requests and have provided no objection. A public hearing notice was also mailed to Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District. The most recent SCUC ISD Demographic Report and 10 Year Campus Forecasting Report have been attached to the Staff Report. The Planning and Zoning Commission and City Council have not provided other factors for the consideration of the amendment. RECOMMENDATION Due to the proposed zone change to Single-Family Residential District (R-6) meeting the intent of the Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation and compatibility with the existing neighborhood at the subject property, Staff recommends approval of PLZC20250032. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Notification Map  Public Hearing Responses  Zoning Exhibit  Survey  Letter of Intent  SCUC ISD Demographic Report  SCUC ISD 10- Year Forecasting  Rezoning Case 305 Aviation Ave PLZC20250032 Planned Commercial Collector A Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector B Planned Residential Collector Residential Collector Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Principal Arterial Freeway Minor Roads Major Roads Highways Project Boundary ETJ Schertz Municipal Boundary County Boundaries Unknown 36" 30" 24" 20" 18" 16" 12" 10" 8" 6" 4" 3" 2" 1" Private Pressure Neighboring Gravity Schertz Pressure Schertz Gravity Sewer Main Schertz Treatment Plant3Q CCMA Treatment Plant3Q Schertz Lift Station[Ú Private Lift Station[Ú CCMA Lift Station[Ú Manholes!P HydrantUµ UU U U U U U U U U U U !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P 4 6 5 2 4 O L D C O R N S U S A N L Y N N 4 6 5 2 3 G O M E Z J O S E A 4 6 5 2 6 G A R C I A L A U R A & H E R N A N S A N D O V A L 4 6 5 2 2 A L O N G I D O M I N I C K 4 6 5 2 7 W I L L I A M S P A U L H E N R Y 4 6 5 2 8 E D M O N D S O N D O N E L L A 4 6 5 2 5 O L D C O R N S U S A N L Y N N 4 6 5 2 9 G A R C I A S A N D R A 1 5 2 2 3 T R E V I N O A L F R E D O P I I I & N O R A 1 5 3 5 3 B U E K E R P A U L 1 5 3 5 4 N E L E I G H C H A R L E S D & M C 1 5 3 5 5 H O L C O M B D E A N R I C A R D O 1 5 3 5 6 H O L M A N D O N A L D L E E 1 5 3 5 7 E I Y N C K C L A R E N C E P J R 1 5 3 6 7 C R U Z M O L L Y A R I Z P E 1 5 3 7 4 G O N Z A L E Z J O S E D E R L Y 1 5 3 7 5 K N E U P P E R M A R Y A N N 15376 THE BRANDO & JANET DEL ROSARIO TRUST DTD 12-15-20 1 5 3 6 6 P O O L E A L L E N E A R L 1 5 3 6 5 W A L L I S R E N E E R 1 5 2 2 4 F R E D H O L M T E R R Y S C H O O L C R A F T 1 5 2 3 0 S H O C K L E Y W I L L I A M G 174165 MORRISSEY DOUGLAS ANDREW II 1 5 3 5 8 T A P S O N K I M 1 5 3 6 3 G A R C I A M I K A E L A K 1 5 3 6 4 L E D F O R D M I C H A E L & S T A C E Y 15231 CORDOVA-VALADEZ JUDY 15968 HUHN SANDRA GARCIA 15215 CITY OF SCHERTZ 15216 CITY OF SCHERTZ Guadalupe County AVIAT I O N A V E MAPL E DR B E A C O N A V E AERO A V E E L M A V E O A K S T MARI L Y N D R MITCH E L L A V E PECA N D R 8 " W L 6"WL6" WL 8" WL 8" WL 8" WL 8" WL 6 " W L 6 " W L 8" W L 6" WL 3" WL 8 " W L 3" WL 8" WL 3" WL 8" WL 3/4" WL 8" WL 8 " W L 3/ 4 " W L 8 " W L 3" WL 8 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 3" WL 6" WL 3/4" WL 3/ 4 " W L 3/4" WL 8" WL 3" WL 8 " W L 3/4" WL 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/4" W L 3/4" W L 3/4" WL 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/4 " WL 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/4" WL 3/ 4 " W L 3/4" WL 3 / 4 " W L 3/ 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/ 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/ 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 6 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 8 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/4" W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3/4" WL 3 / 4 " W L 3/4" W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 8 " W L 2" WL 3 / 4 " W L 3 / 4 " W L 8" WL 6 " W L 6 " W L 3" WL 3" WL 3" WL 8" WL 3" WL 3" WL 6 " W L 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6"Vitr i f i e d Clay 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6 " V i t r i f i e d C l a y 6"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 8"Vitr i f i e d C l a y 6"Vitr i f i e d C l a y Maxar, Microsoft 0 150 30075Feet Last update: February 10, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Bill Gardner, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1185 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind includingbut not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liablefor any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance ofthese materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may beadded to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* Proposed Rezone 305 Aviation Ave (PLZC20250032) City of Schertz 302MAPLE DR (46524) 226MAPLE DR(46523) 310MAPLE DR (46526) 222MAPLE DR (46522) 314MAPLE DR(46527) 318MAPLE DR (46528) 306MAPLE DR(46525) 322MAPLE DR(46529) 211 AVIATION AVE(15223) 300AVIATION AVE (15353) 302AVIATION AVE (15354) 304AVIATION AVE (15355) 306 AVIATION AVE(15356) 308AVIATION AVE (15357) 301 AVIATION AVE(15367) 307 AVIATION AVE(15374) 309AVIATION AVE(15375) 311AVIATION AVE (15376) 301 MITCHELL AVE(15366) 303MITCHELL AVE (15365) 213AVIATION AVE (15224) 210AVIATION AVE(15230) 305AVIATION AVE (174165)310AVIATION AVE (15358) 307MITCHELL AVE(15363) 305MITCHELL AVE (15364) 212AVIATION AVE (15231) E L M A V E AVIAT I O N A V E B E A C O N A V E MITCH E L L A V E MAPLE D R Parcels 200' Buffer Project Boundary µ 0 100 200 30050Feet R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 MITCH E L L A V E B E A C O N A V E E L M A V E AVIAT I O N A V E MAPLE D R R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-2 R-6 E L M A V E B E A C O N A V E MITCH E L L A V E AVIAT I O N A V E MAPLE D R Last update: February 10, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Bill Gardner, gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1185 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but notlimited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special,indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials.Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* 305 AVIATION AVE GCAD: PARCEL ID 174165 CURRENT (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (OP) Office and Professional (NS) Neighborhood Services (GB-2) General Business II (GB) General Business (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (TH) Townhome (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (AD) Agricultural District (R-7) Single-family Residential (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (PUB) Public Use (PDD) Planned Development (PRE) Pre-Development ClassificationProposed Zoning Change PROPOSED 0 100 200 30050Feet µ 17 January 2025 To: City of Schertz Planning Department 1400 Schertz Parkway Bldg. 1 210-619-1780 From: Douglas Andrew Morrissey II 409 Aero Avenue Schertz TX 78154 228-265-1030 Subject: 305 Aviation Avenue, Schertz TX 78154 / Rezoning The property is Parcel 174165 and is 0.387 acres located at 305 Aviation Avenue, Schertz TX 78154 in the Aviation Heights subdivision. The land is approximately 137.5’ x 122’ and currently zoned as R-2 and I would like to rezone it to R-6. Ultimately, I would like the land to be replat with an equal split creating two R-6 plats approximately 68.75’ x 122’ which is greater than the minimum requirements for R-6 zoning but would not meet the minimum requirements for R-2 zoning. By rezoning the land and replating it as two R-6 zones, I will be able to build two dwellings replacing an empty lot with two new homes in the Aviation Heights subdivision. The first home constructed will be my primary residence and the second home will be a home for my parents to come to as they get older in age. Both properties will be maintained by me as the owner. Douglas Andrew Morrissey II Owner of 305 Aviation Avenue 3Q24 Demographic Report 2 Annual Enrollment Change *Yellow Box = largest grade per year Green Box = second largest grade per year Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2024/25 384 747 849 866 1,006 1,043 1,108 1,118 1,126 1,198 1,413 1,427 1,354 1,225 14,864 Difference 60 -10 -35 29 -17 -25 13 -2 -14 34 56 -24 40 -23 82 18.5%-1.1%-3.4%2.8%-1.6%-2.2%1.1%-0.2%-1.1%2.8%4.3%-1.7%3.1%-1.8%0.5% 3-year avg.0.992 0.924 1.028 1.025 1.026 1.023 0.984 1.023 1.020 1.029 1.127 0.975 0.928 0.995 1.005 1.004 1.025 1.006 Cohorts PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Elem Int Mid High 2021/22 1.400 0.983 1.048 1.000 1.033 1.036 0.990 1.068 1.045 1.056 1.171 1.042 0.936 0.969 1.020 1.029 1.050 1.029 2022/23 0.958 0.876 1.029 1.001 1.057 1.037 0.956 1.008 1.007 1.015 1.121 0.960 0.926 0.983 1.000 0.982 1.011 0.998 2023/24 0.986 0.962 1.023 1.005 0.999 1.012 0.969 1.028 1.040 1.028 1.099 0.987 0.903 1.031 1.000 0.998 1.034 1.005 2024/25 1.033 0.935 1.033 1.068 1.023 1.021 1.028 1.034 1.014 1.046 1.162 0.978 0.955 0.971 1.016 1.031 1.030 1.017 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Oct-24 Oct-23 3 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.9 3.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p - 1 9 No v - 1 9 Ja n - 2 0 Ma r - 2 0 Ma y - 2 0 Ju l - 2 0 Se p - 2 0 No v - 2 0 Ja n - 2 1 Ma r - 2 1 Ma y - 2 1 Ju l - 2 1 Se p - 2 1 No v - 2 1 Ja n - 2 2 Ma r - 2 2 Ma y - 2 2 Ju l - 2 2 Se p - 2 2 No v - 2 2 Ja n - 2 3 Ma r - 2 3 Ma y - 2 3 Ju l - 2 3 Se p - 2 3 No v - 2 3 Ja n - 2 4 Ma r - 2 4 Ma y - 2 4 Ju l - 2 4 Se p - 2 4 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Oct 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 17,441 17,992 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q3 2015Q3 2016Q3 2017Q3 2018Q3 2019Q3 2020Q3 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings San Antonio New Home Closings Source: Zonda Key Trends Starts: +29% YOY / +1% QOQ Closings: -5% YOY / -4% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 551 Homes 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –3Q24 * Based on additional research by Zonda Education ** Totals DO NOT include age-restricted communities Rank District Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,637 3,710 1,999 6,305 21,310 2 COMAL ISD 2,442 2,704 1,776 4,918 24,373 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,202 2,382 1,217 4,596 31,031 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,222 2,055 1,254 4,560 24,573 5 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,333 1,203 739 2,317 7,002 6 JUDSON ISD 679 941 308 508 969 7 SCHERTZ CIBOLO ISD*770 831 442 1,939 6,169 8 NAVARRO ISD 834 810 482 1,253 6,877 9 BOERNE ISD 784 768 555 1,264 9,651 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 706 731 298 964 16,713 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 610 618 388 767 6,366 12 NORTH EAST ISD 347 342 220 899 5,316 13 SEGUIN ISD 318 321 250 588 5,519 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 247 222 162 160 720 15 MARION ISD 194 166 111 264 4,352 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 127 139 54 205 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 70 100 138 327 688 18 LYTLE ISD 88 73 50 334 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 49 64 25 83 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 4 39 23 16 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings by Quarter Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 612 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 684 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 85 19 110 27 29 52 275 238 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 4 0 1 0 1 3 41 242 ROSE GARDEN 205 57 226 38 86 126 680 2,722 SCHERTZ 0 0 23 2 0 1 0 60 SIPPEL 288 63 227 64 89 151 637 1,556 WATTS 53 7 93 26 14 28 23 580 WIEDERSTEIN 135 17 151 43 28 81 283 771 Grand Total 770 163 831 200 247 442 1,939 6,169 •The district has 24 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions •265 lots were delivered in the 3rd quarter 9 District Housing Overview Residential Activity 10 Grace Valley •868 total lots •574 future lots •159 vacant developed lots •31 homes under construction •97 occupied homes •Started 115 homes in last 12 months, started 28 homes in 3Q24 •Streets being paved for 162 lots in Phase 2 •Lennar •$237K+ •Current Student Yield = .20 Nov 2024 Nov 2024Residential Activity 11 Carmel Ranch •127 total lots •120 vacant developed lots •7 homes under construction •All lots delivered for homebuilding 3Q24 •Anticipate first homes Spring 2025 •Meritage Homes •$402K+ Saddlebrook Ranch •635 total lots •467 future lots •164 vacant developed lots •4 homes under construction •First homes started 3Q24 •Groundwork underway on 132 lots in Phase 4 & 6 •Ashton Woods Homes •$360K+ Residential Activity 12 Clearwater Creek •1,156 total future lots •Initial groundwork underway on 104 lots in Phase 1 •Lennar Nov 2024 13 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family Market-September 2024 14 District Multifamily Overview •There are more than 600 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes •There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district Residential Activity 15 Schertz Station •318 single-family rental homes under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 Residential Activity 16 Aviator 1518 •300 apartment units under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 •There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district •The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 17 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 18 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 19 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12)827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13)862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14)937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15)985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16)989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17)995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18)1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19)982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20)1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21)951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22)935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23)819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24)788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25)739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26)699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27)763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28)750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29)776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD KG Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 20 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 -107 -0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 -221 -1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 -209 -1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 -172 -1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 -197 -1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 -63 -0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 -89 -0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 -165 -1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 -41 -0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 -5 0.0% 21 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change -4.17%-3.35%-1.80%-1.18%0.72%1.06%2.22%1.44%1.75%1.72%1.91% Elementary Absolute Change -213 -164 -85 -55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%-0.40%-3.73%-2.61%-4.69%-5.02%-3.97%2.48%2.85%0.47%2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 -9 -83 -56 -98 -100 -75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change -4.01%-2.01%4.31%-0.96%-3.96%-2.68%-4.73%-4.73%-4.02%2.43%2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change -98 -47 99 -23 -94 -61 -105 -100 -81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92%2.07%-2.72%-1.38%-0.24%-1.59%0.25%-1.95%-4.30%-3.68%-4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 -152 -75 -13 -85 13 -103 -222 -182 -203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change -1.32%-0.72%-1.49%-1.43%-1.19%-1.38%-0.45%-0.64%-1.19%-0.30%-0.04% District Absolute Change -200 -107 -221 -209 -172 -197 -63 -89 -165 -41 -5 22 Key Takeaways If the current trend continues, Schertz-Cibolo- Universal City ISD could experience more than 900 new home closings by the end of 2024 The district has more than 440 homes currently in inventory with more than 1,900 additional lots available to build on Groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD is forecasted to enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (CURRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 5 B   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner SUBJECT:PLUDC20250035 - Conduct a public hearing, workshop and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change. BACKGROUND The proposed Unified Development Code (UDC) amendments are an effort to help clarify language in the UDC for applicants, residents, and Staff. The proposed amendment is in Article 5, Section 21.5.4. This is in response to changes to the City Charter that were approved by voters on November 5, 2024. Among those approved changes was the reduction of required ordinance hearings from two to one. Ordinances now only require one City Council hearing for approval. This change requires some edits to this particular section of the UDC where two meetings are still referenced. GOAL Staff is proposing to clarify language in the UDC to align with changes that were recently approved by Schertz voters in the November ballot. Among those approved changes was the reduction of required ordinance hearings from two to one. Ordinances now only require one City Council hearing for approval. UDC Section 21.5.4.E. details the process for counting protest votes and in 21.5.4.E.4 there is language referencing two meetings that needs to be removed and revised.  COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating Unified Development Code amendments, staff uses the Criteria for Approval located in UDC Section 21.4.7.D. 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City As part of promoting health, safety, and general welfare, Staff is taking active steps to ensure the well-being of its residents by making the city's development code more clear and easier to understand. This is often necessary when policy/practice changes in the city, like when voters approve charter amendments. 2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of this UDC and the City The City of Schertz voters approving changes to the City Charter indicate a new policy direction. Updating language in the UDC to match this direction helps achieve consistency across goals, objectives, and policies.  3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law. The amendment to UDC 21.5.4.E is a direct response to a change in the City Charter.  4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. No other additional factors have been deemed relevant at this time. RECOMMENDATION The proposed amendments help the UDC align with changes to city policy. Therefore, Staff is recommending approval of PLUDC20250035. Attachments UDC Article 5 - PRE Dimensions (redlines)  UDC Article 5 - PRE Dimensions (clean)  Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 3 Sec. 21.5.4. Zoning Change. A. Applicability. 1. The City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, by request of the City Manager or his/her designee, or by application from a property owner, establish or amend the boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City. A zoning change is required to establish the use of land and the development associated with the proposed zoning classification for the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City. 2. Approval of a zoning change authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the amendment. B. Application Requirements. 1. Application Required. Any request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by an application and zoning exhibit prepared in accordance with the Development Manual. 2. Accompanying Applications. A request for a zoning change may be accompanied by an application for amendment of the Future Land Use Map or by a Subdivision Master Plan. Approval of a zoning change shall require all subsequent development applications to be consistent with the approved amendments. 3. Tax Certificate Required. All applications made as a request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by a copy of a Tax Certificate. C. Processing of Application and Decision. 1. Submittal. An application for a zoning change shall be submitted to the City Manager or his/her designee. The City Manager or his/her designee shall review the application for completeness in accordance with section 21.4.2. The City Manager or his/her designee may, at its option, request a recommendation from any other City Department or consultant. The City Manager or his/her designee shall notify the applicant of items requiring correction or attention before providing a recommendation on the application. After appropriate review, the City Manager or his/her designee shall forward a written recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 2. Notification Requirements. An application for a zoning change requires the following notification in accordance with section 21.4.3: a. written notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and b. published notice prior to consideration by the City Council. c. posted notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and prior to consideration by the City Council. 3. Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4 and make a written recommendation regarding a proposed zoning change to the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the recommendation to the City Council. 4. Decision by City Council. The City Council shall receive the written recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a proposed zoning change and shall hold a public hearing in accordance Proposed UDC Amendment Redlines Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 3 with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4. The City Council may vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the zoning change. The City Council may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the final decision. 5. Consideration of a Previously Denied Zoning Change. A request for a zoning change for a tract of land shall not be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council within six (6) months after the Council's decision to deny the request unless the request is to a different zoning classification or there has been a substantial change in the conditions surrounding the parcel since the initial request. For the purpose of this section, a request may be considered substantially different if the change is to a different zoning classification, there is a change in conditions relating to zoning principles of the property or surrounding properties or there is a change in the nature of the development of the property or surrounding properties. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to determine whether the request is substantially different from the initial request. D. Criteria for Approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission, in making its recommendation, and the City Council, in considering final action on a zoning change, should consider the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the zone change. E. Protests. 1. If a proposed zoning change is protested in accordance with this section, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths (¾) of all members of the City Council according to LGC, Local Government Code § 211.006(d). The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least twenty percent (20%) of either: a. The area of the lots or land covered by the proposed zoning change; or b. The area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed zoning change and extending 200 feet from that area. 2. In computing the percentage of land area under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the area of streets and alleys shall be included. 3. In determining property ownership under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the property owner shall be the owner as indicated on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, unless the property has been bought or sold since the last approved municipal tax roll. The City Manager or his/her designee determines property ownership in the above-mentioned municipal tax roll from the County Appraisal District. a. If a property has recently been purchased and the County Appraisal District has not updated their public records to reflect the now current property owner, the new property owner must submit proof of ownership with their written protest to demonstrate ownership for the protest to be counted under section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event of a conflict in property ownership, the City Manager or his/her designee shall determine who the owner of the property is for the purposes of calculating written protest. Proposed UDC Amendment Redlines Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 3 c. The written protest will only be counted if signed by the owner of the property. Written protests from tenants or lessees will not be counted toward the written protest calculations under section 21.5.4.E.1. 4. The following deadlines appliesy to the receipt and calculation of written protest: a. First Reading. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the consideration first reading of the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. b. Second Reading. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the second reading of the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. c. Written protest received prior to the First Reading deadline will also be included in the Second Reading written protest calculation. d. In calculating the written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1., only the most recent written protest received prior to the deadline above will be counted per property. be. In the event a federal, state, or local holiday prevents staff from receiving votes on the Friday before the City Council reading, the deadline will be extended to noon (12pm) on the next business day. (Ord. No. 17-S-42, § 1(Exh. A), 10-24-2017; Ord. No. 18-S-04, § 1(Exh. A), 1-23-2018; Ord. No. 23-S-78, § 1(Exh. A), 11-14-2023) Proposed UDC Amendment Redlines Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 3 Sec. 21.5.4. Zoning Change. A. Applicability. 1. The City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, by request of the City Manager or his/her designee, or by application from a property owner, establish or amend the boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City. A zoning change is required to establish the use of land and the development associated with the proposed zoning classification for the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City. 2. Approval of a zoning change authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the amendment. B. Application Requirements. 1. Application Required. Any request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by an application and zoning exhibit prepared in accordance with the Development Manual. 2. Accompanying Applications. A request for a zoning change may be accompanied by an application for amendment of the Future Land Use Map or by a Subdivision Master Plan. Approval of a zoning change shall require all subsequent development applications to be consistent with the approved amendments. 3. Tax Certificate Required. All applications made as a request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by a copy of a Tax Certificate. C. Processing of Application and Decision. 1. Submittal. An application for a zoning change shall be submitted to the City Manager or his/her designee. The City Manager or his/her designee shall review the application for completeness in accordance with section 21.4.2. The City Manager or his/her designee may, at its option, request a recommendation from any other City Department or consultant. The City Manager or his/her designee shall notify the applicant of items requiring correction or attention before providing a recommendation on the application. After appropriate review, the City Manager or his/her designee shall forward a written recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 2. Notification Requirements. An application for a zoning change requires the following notification in accordance with section 21.4.3: a. written notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and b. published notice prior to consideration by the City Council. c. posted notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and prior to consideration by the City Council. 3. Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4 and make a written recommendation regarding a proposed zoning change to the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the recommendation to the City Council. 4. Decision by City Council. The City Council shall receive the written recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a proposed zoning change and shall hold a public hearing in accordance Proposed UDC Amendments Clean Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 3 with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4. The City Council may vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the zoning change. The City Council may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the final decision. 5. Consideration of a Previously Denied Zoning Change. A request for a zoning change for a tract of land shall not be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council within six (6) months after the Council's decision to deny the request unless the request is to a different zoning classification or there has been a substantial change in the conditions surrounding the parcel since the initial request. For the purpose of this section, a request may be considered substantially different if the change is to a different zoning classification, there is a change in conditions relating to zoning principles of the property or surrounding properties or there is a change in the nature of the development of the property or surrounding properties. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to determine whether the request is substantially different from the initial request. D. Criteria for Approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission, in making its recommendation, and the City Council, in considering final action on a zoning change, should consider the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the zone change. E. Protests. 1. If a proposed zoning change is protested in accordance with this section, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths (¾) of all members of the City Council according to LGC, Local Government Code § 211.006(d). The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least twenty percent (20%) of either: a. The area of the lots or land covered by the proposed zoning change; or b. The area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed zoning change and extending 200 feet from that area. 2. In computing the percentage of land area under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the area of streets and alleys shall be included. 3. In determining property ownership under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the property owner shall be the owner as indicated on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, unless the property has been bought or sold since the last approved municipal tax roll. The City Manager or his/her designee determines property ownership in the above-mentioned municipal tax roll from the County Appraisal District. a. If a property has recently been purchased and the County Appraisal District has not updated their public records to reflect the now current property owner, the new property owner must submit proof of ownership with their written protest to demonstrate ownership for the protest to be counted under section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event of a conflict in property ownership, the City Manager or his/her designee shall determine who the owner of the property is for the purposes of calculating written protest. Proposed UDC Amendments Clean Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 3 c. The written protest will only be counted if signed by the owner of the property. Written protests from tenants or lessees will not be counted toward the written protest calculations under section 21.5.4.E.1. 4. The following deadline applies to the receipt and calculation of written protest: a. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the consideration of the proposed zoning change ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event a federal, state, or local holiday prevents staff from receiving votes on the Friday before the City Council reading, the deadline will be extended to noon (12pm) on the next business day. (Ord. No. 17-S-42, § 1(Exh. A), 10-24-2017; Ord. No. 18-S-04, § 1(Exh. A), 1-23-2018; Ord. No. 23-S-78, § 1(Exh. A), 11-14-2023) Proposed UDC Amendments Clean PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 6 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner SUBJECT:PLUDC20250001 - WITHDRAWN Consider and take possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change, and Article 5, Section 21.5.7. - Dimensional and Developmental Standards.- No Action to Occur BACKGROUND The proposed Unified Development Code (UDC) amendments were for two separate sections listed below.  Article 5, Section 21.5.4. - Zoning Change  Subsection E.4 - Protest 1. Article 5, Section 21.5.7.  Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts 2. Staff had originally packaged these amendments together in an effort to clean-up items in the UDC. However, the proposed amendment regarding the Pre-Development Zoning District (PRE) may require additional notification to property owners than originally thought. This is due to recent, on-going case law in the State of Texas.  This application was posted as an item on the February 5, 2025, Planning and Zoning Commission Agenda. At that meeting, a Public Hearing was conducted and the Planning and Zoning Commission ultimately tabled the UDC Amendment per staff's request to the March 5, 2025, meeting until staff got further understanding from the City's attorney's office. Based off the council from the City Attorney's office, staff has withdrawn this application, and will move forward with the proposed amendments as separate items. GOAL Application withdrawn. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION Application withdrawn - no recommendation necessary. RECOMMENDATION Application withdrawn - no recommendation necessary. Attachments UDC Article 5 - Protest (redlines)  UDC Article 5 - Protest (clean)  UDC Article 5 - PRE Dimensions (redlines)  UDC Article 5 - PRE Dimensions (clean)  Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 3 Sec. 21.5.4. Zoning Change. A. Applicability. 1. The City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, by request of the City Manager or his/her designee, or by application from a property owner, establish or amend the boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City. A zoning change is required to establish the use of land and the development associated with the proposed zoning classification for the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City. 2. Approval of a zoning change authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the amendment. B. Application Requirements. 1. Application Required. Any request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by an application and zoning exhibit prepared in accordance with the Development Manual. 2. Accompanying Applications. A request for a zoning change may be accompanied by an application for amendment of the Future Land Use Map or by a Subdivision Master Plan. Approval of a zoning change shall require all subsequent development applications to be consistent with the approved amendments. 3. Tax Certificate Required. All applications made as a request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by a copy of a Tax Certificate. C. Processing of Application and Decision. 1. Submittal. An application for a zoning change shall be submitted to the City Manager or his/her designee. The City Manager or his/her designee shall review the application for completeness in accordance with section 21.4.2. The City Manager or his/her designee may, at its option, request a recommendation from any other City Department or consultant. The City Manager or his/her designee shall notify the applicant of items requiring correction or attention before providing a recommendation on the application. After appropriate review, the City Manager or his/her designee shall forward a written recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 2. Notification Requirements. An application for a zoning change requires the following notification in accordance with section 21.4.3: a. written notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and b. published notice prior to consideration by the City Council. c. posted notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and prior to consideration by the City Council. 3. Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4 and make a written recommendation regarding a proposed zoning change to the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the recommendation to the City Council. 4. Decision by City Council. The City Council shall receive the written recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a proposed zoning change and shall hold a public hearing in accordance Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 3 with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4. The City Council may vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the zoning change. The City Council may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the final decision. 5. Consideration of a Previously Denied Zoning Change. A request for a zoning change for a tract of land shall not be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council within six (6) months after the Council's decision to deny the request unless the request is to a different zoning classification or there has been a substantial change in the conditions surrounding the parcel since the initial request. For the purpose of this section, a request may be considered substantially different if the change is to a different zoning classification, there is a change in conditions relating to zoning principles of the property or surrounding properties or there is a change in the nature of the development of the property or surrounding properties. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to determine whether the request is substantially different from the initial request. D. Criteria for Approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission, in making its recommendation, and the City Council, in considering final action on a zoning change, should consider the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the zone change. E. Protests. 1. If a proposed zoning change is protested in accordance with this section, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths (¾) of all members of the City Council according to LGC, Local Government Code § 211.006(d). The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least twenty percent (20%) of either: a. The area of the lots or land covered by the proposed zoning change; or b. The area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed zoning change and extending 200 feet from that area. 2. In computing the percentage of land area under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the area of streets and alleys shall be included. 3. In determining property ownership under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the property owner shall be the owner as indicated on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, unless the property has been bought or sold since the last approved municipal tax roll. The City Manager or his/her designee determines property ownership in the above-mentioned municipal tax roll from the County Appraisal District. a. If a property has recently been purchased and the County Appraisal District has not updated their public records to reflect the now current property owner, the new property owner must submit proof of ownership with their written protest to demonstrate ownership for the protest to be counted under section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event of a conflict in property ownership, the City Manager or his/her designee shall determine who the owner of the property is for the purposes of calculating written protest. Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 3 c. The written protest will only be counted if signed by the owner of the property. Written protests from tenants or lessees will not be counted toward the written protest calculations under section 21.5.4.E.1. 4. The following deadlines appliesy to the receipt and calculation of written protest: a. First Reading. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the consideration first reading of the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. b. Second Reading. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the second reading of the proposed zoning change or zoning map amendment ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. c. Written protest received prior to the First Reading deadline will also be included in the Second Reading written protest calculation. d. In calculating the written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1., only the most recent written protest received prior to the deadline above will be counted per property. be. In the event a federal, state, or local holiday prevents staff from receiving votes on the Friday before the City Council reading, the deadline will be extended to noon (12pm) on the next business day. (Ord. No. 17-S-42, § 1(Exh. A), 10-24-2017; Ord. No. 18-S-04, § 1(Exh. A), 1-23-2018; Ord. No. 23-S-78, § 1(Exh. A), 11-14-2023) Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 3 Sec. 21.5.4. Zoning Change. A. Applicability. 1. The City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, by request of the City Manager or his/her designee, or by application from a property owner, establish or amend the boundaries shown on the Official Zoning Map of the City. A zoning change is required to establish the use of land and the development associated with the proposed zoning classification for the purpose of establishing and maintaining sound, stable and desirable development within the City. 2. Approval of a zoning change authorizes a property owner to submit subsequent development applications consistent with the amendment. B. Application Requirements. 1. Application Required. Any request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by an application and zoning exhibit prepared in accordance with the Development Manual. 2. Accompanying Applications. A request for a zoning change may be accompanied by an application for amendment of the Future Land Use Map or by a Subdivision Master Plan. Approval of a zoning change shall require all subsequent development applications to be consistent with the approved amendments. 3. Tax Certificate Required. All applications made as a request for a zoning change shall be accompanied by a copy of a Tax Certificate. C. Processing of Application and Decision. 1. Submittal. An application for a zoning change shall be submitted to the City Manager or his/her designee. The City Manager or his/her designee shall review the application for completeness in accordance with section 21.4.2. The City Manager or his/her designee may, at its option, request a recommendation from any other City Department or consultant. The City Manager or his/her designee shall notify the applicant of items requiring correction or attention before providing a recommendation on the application. After appropriate review, the City Manager or his/her designee shall forward a written recommendation to the Planning and Zoning Commission for consideration. 2. Notification Requirements. An application for a zoning change requires the following notification in accordance with section 21.4.3: a. written notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission; and b. published notice prior to consideration by the City Council. c. posted notice prior to consideration by the Planning and Zoning Commission and prior to consideration by the City Council. 3. Commission Recommendation. The Planning and Zoning Commission shall hold a public hearing in accordance with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4 and make a written recommendation regarding a proposed zoning change to the City Council. The Planning and Zoning Commission may recommend approval, approval with conditions, or denial of the zoning change. The Planning and Zoning Commission may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the recommendation to the City Council. 4. Decision by City Council. The City Council shall receive the written recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission regarding a proposed zoning change and shall hold a public hearing in accordance Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 3 with the Texas Open Meetings Act and section 21.4.4. The City Council may vote to approve, approve with conditions, or deny the zoning change. The City Council may, on its own motion or by request of the property owner, postpone consideration of the request to a certain date that is not more than thirty (30) calendar days after the date of the current consideration in order to review additional information or modifications which may have a direct bearing on the final decision. 5. Consideration of a Previously Denied Zoning Change. A request for a zoning change for a tract of land shall not be considered by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the City Council within six (6) months after the Council's decision to deny the request unless the request is to a different zoning classification or there has been a substantial change in the conditions surrounding the parcel since the initial request. For the purpose of this section, a request may be considered substantially different if the change is to a different zoning classification, there is a change in conditions relating to zoning principles of the property or surrounding properties or there is a change in the nature of the development of the property or surrounding properties. The City Manager or his/her designee shall have the authority to determine whether the request is substantially different from the initial request. D. Criteria for Approval. The Planning and Zoning Commission, in making its recommendation, and the City Council, in considering final action on a zoning change, should consider the following criteria: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; 2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; 4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the zone change. E. Protests. 1. If a proposed zoning change is protested in accordance with this section, the proposed change must receive, in order to take effect, the affirmative vote of at least three-fourths (¾) of all members of the City Council according to LGC, Local Government Code § 211.006(d). The protest must be written and signed by the owners of at least twenty percent (20%) of either: a. The area of the lots or land covered by the proposed zoning change; or b. The area of the lots or land immediately adjoining the area covered by the proposed zoning change and extending 200 feet from that area. 2. In computing the percentage of land area under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the area of streets and alleys shall be included. 3. In determining property ownership under section 21.5.4.E.1 above, the property owner shall be the owner as indicated on the most recently approved municipal tax roll, unless the property has been bought or sold since the last approved municipal tax roll. The City Manager or his/her designee determines property ownership in the above-mentioned municipal tax roll from the County Appraisal District. a. If a property has recently been purchased and the County Appraisal District has not updated their public records to reflect the now current property owner, the new property owner must submit proof of ownership with their written protest to demonstrate ownership for the protest to be counted under section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event of a conflict in property ownership, the City Manager or his/her designee shall determine who the owner of the property is for the purposes of calculating written protest. Created: 2024-10-04 12:45:14 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 3 c. The written protest will only be counted if signed by the owner of the property. Written protests from tenants or lessees will not be counted toward the written protest calculations under section 21.5.4.E.1. 4. The following deadline applies to the receipt and calculation of written protest: a. Written protest must be received before noon (12pm) on the Friday before the consideration of the proposed zoning change ordinance by the City Council, in order to be included in the calculation of written protest described by section 21.5.4.E.1. b. In the event a federal, state, or local holiday prevents staff from receiving votes on the Friday before the City Council reading, the deadline will be extended to noon (12pm) on the next business day. (Ord. No. 17-S-42, § 1(Exh. A), 10-24-2017; Ord. No. 18-S-04, § 1(Exh. A), 1-23-2018; Ord. No. 23-S-78, § 1(Exh. A), 11-14-2023) Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 1 of 6 Sec. 21.5.7. Dimensional and Developmental Standards. A. General. All projects or developments shall comply with all of the applicable dimensional and development standards of this Article. Additional requirements may also apply as required in other sections of this UDC. All area requirements and lot sizes shall be calculated based on gross acres. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 2 of 6 Table 21.5.7.A DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Minimum Lot Size And Dimensions Minimum Yard Setback (Ft) Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Minimum Off- Street Parking Spaces Max Height Ft. Max Imperv Cover Key PRE Pre-Development 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% h,k,o R-1 Single-Family Residential District-1 9,600 80 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,j,k,l, m,o R-2 Single-Family Residential District-2 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,j,k,l, m,o R-3 Two-Family Residential District 9,000 75 120 25 10 20 2 35 60% h,j,k,l, m,o R-4 Apartment/Multi-Family Residential District 43,560 400 100 25 10 20 2 50 75% a,b,j,k, l,m, R-5 Middle Density District 10,890 - - 25 10 10 2 35 80% h,j,k,l, m, q R-6 Single-Family Residential District-6 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n,o R-7 Single-Family Residential District-7 6,600 60 110 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n,o R-A Single-Family- Residential/Agriculture 21,780 - - 25 25 25 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n GH Garden Home Residential District 5,000 50 100 10 10 10 2 35 75% c,d,e,f, g,k,l,m TH Townhome District 2,500 25 100 25 10 20 2 35 75% h,j,k,l, m MHS Manufactured Home Subdivision District 6,600 60 110 25 10 20 2 35 50% j,k,l, m,o MHP Manufactured Home Park District 43,560 - - 25 12.5 25 - 35 50% j,k,l,m AD Agricultural District 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% h,k,o Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 3 of 6 MSMU Main Street Mixed Use 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 2 35 80% h,j,k,m, n,p MSMU-ND Main Street Mixed Use-New Development 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 2 35 80% j,k,m,p Key: a. Maximum density shall not exceed 35 units per acre. b. 2 parking spaces per unit plus 5%. c. Zero lot line Garden Homes. d. 20-foot paved alley for ingress/egress to all rear garages. e. 5-foot shall be designated maintenance easement. f. Corner lot shall have 10-foot side yard setback from street right-of-way. g. 25-foot set back to property line adjoining public street. h. Corner lot shall have minimum 15-foot side yard setback from street right-of-way. For properties on Main Street, the City Engineer may authorize a reduction to no less than 10' if there are no sight distance issues. i. Minimum lot area for each unit. j. Site Plan approval required. k. Swimming pools count toward the maximum impervious cover limitations, unless the swimming pool is equipped with a water overflow device appropriate for such pool, and only if it drains into any pervious surface, in which case the water surface shall be excluded. l. No variances may be permitted to exceed the maximum impervious cover limitations m. Refer to Article 14, section 21.14.3 for additional design requirements n. All single family residential dwelling units constructed within this district shall be constructed with an enclosed garage. o. Side yard setback of 7.5 ft. for R-1, R-2, R-3, R-6, R-7, and MHS continues in effect for all subdivisions vested on the date of adoption of Ordinance No. 11-S-15. p. Not subject to the requirements in section 21.10.4 q. Refer to section 21.5.7.B.8 Table 21.5.7.B DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (d) Minimum Lot Size And Dimensions Minimum Yard Setback (Ft) Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 4 of 6 Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Rear Adj Non- Res Zone Rear Adj. Res Zone Side Adj Non- Res Zone Side Adj Res Zone Max Ht. Ft. Max Imperv Cover Key OP Office/ Professional 6,000 60 100 25 0 25 0 25 35 70% a, b, c, d NS Neighborhood Services 10,000 100 100 25a 0 25 0 25 35 80% a, b, c, d GB General Business 10,000 100 100 25 0 25 0 25 120 80% a, b, c, d GB-2 General Business-2 10,000 100 100 25 0 25 0 25 120 80% a, b, c, d M-1 Light Manufacturing 10,000 100 100 25 0 50c 0 25b 120 80% a, b, c, d M-2 Heavy Manufacturing 10,000 100 100 25 0 50c 0 25b 120 80% a, b, c, d PUB Public Use District 10,000 100 100 25 0 15 0 25 35 70% a, c, d Key: a. See Article 10 for parking requirements. b. Uses may require a Specific Use Permit. The City of Schertz will follow the guidelines outlined in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) study for Randolph Air Force Base. c. No variances may be permitted to exceed the maximum impervious cover limitations. d. Refer to Article 14, Sec. 21.14.3 for additional design requirements. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 5 of 6 B. Additional Dimensional and Development Standards. 1. All lots developed for residential purposes shall comply with the lot area, minimum setbacks and height requirements established in table 21.5.7A for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is/are located. All lots developed for allowed non-residential purposes, within residential zoning districts, shall comply with lot, area and height requirements established in table 21.5.7A for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is/are located. 2. All lots developed for non-residential purposes shall comply with lot, area, minimum setbacks, and maximum height requirements established for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is located, as established in table 21.5.7B. 3. All lots shall have at least the minimum area, width and depth as indicated in the tables 21.5.7A and 21.5.7B in this section. 4. Platted subdivisions established by a duly approved plat filed prior to adoption of this UDC shall be exempt from meeting any new lot width, depth, and/or square footage requirements. 5. No lot existing at the time of passage of this UDC shall be reduced in size below the minimum area requirements set forth in tables 21.5.7A and 21.5.7B. 6. Minimum lot size requirements shall not apply to previously platted lots that are annexed into the City, but shall apply in the event of a vacation and replat of such property. All other requirements of this UDC shall nevertheless apply. 7. No portion of any building on a residential lot may be located on any lot closer to any lot line or to the street right-of-way line than is authorized in table 21.5.7A set forth in this section unless otherwise listed below: a. Where the frontage on one (1) side of a street is divided by two (2) or more zoning districts, the front yard setback shall comply with the requirements of most restrictive district for the entire frontage between the nearest intersecting streets. b. Where the building setback line has been established by plat and exceeds the requirements of this UDC, the more restrictive setback line shall apply. c. The front yard setback shall be measured from the property line to the front face of the building, covered porch, covered terrace, or attached accessory building. Eaves and roof extensions may project into the required front yard, not to exceed two (2) feet. d. Side Yards: Every part of a required side yard shall be open and unobstructed except for accessory buildings as permitted herein and the ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices and other architectural features projecting not to exceed twelve (12) inches into the required side yard, and roof eaves projecting not to exceed twenty-four (24) inches into the required side yard. e. Rear Yards: Every part of a required rear yard shall be open and unobstructed, except for accessory buildings, uses and structures as permitted and the ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices and roof overhangs and other architectural features projecting not to exceed twenty-four (24) inches into the required rear yard. f. Where lots have double frontage, running from one street to another, a required front yard setback shall be provided on both streets. g. Mixed Use Building: In a building serving dwelling and other uses, in any district, the height and area regulations applicable to non-residential buildings shall apply. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 6 of 6 h. There shall not be more than one (1) residential dwelling on a platted lot of a duly recorded plat of a single-family residential use. 8. Middle Density District (R-5) developments may have unique designs and dimensions. Due to this, the following additional standards apply. These standards pertain to the side building separation space with the intent for fire safety: a. When HVAC units are not within the building separation space the minimum separation is ten (10) feet. b. When HVAC units are within the building separation space, or either structure is above one story, the minimum separation is fifteen (15) feet. c. HVAC units shall be on opposite sides of buildings. d. These additional standards are not required if fire suppression systems are installed within the buildings. (Ord. No. 13-S-22 , § 3, 7-16-2013; Ord. No. 14-S-47 , § 3, 11-18-2014; Ord. No. 21-S-26 , § 1(Exh. A), 7-6-2021) Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 1 of 6 Sec. 21.5.7. Dimensional and Developmental Standards. A. General. All projects or developments shall comply with all of the applicable dimensional and development standards of this Article. Additional requirements may also apply as required in other sections of this UDC. All area requirements and lot sizes shall be calculated based on gross acres. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 2 of 6 Table 21.5.7.A DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS Minimum Lot Size And Dimensions Minimum Yard Setback (Ft) Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Side Ft. Rear Ft. Minimum Off- Street Parking Spaces Max Height Ft. Max Imperv Cover Key PRE Pre-Development 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% h,k,o R-1 Single-Family Residential District-1 9,600 80 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,j,k,l, m,o R-2 Single-Family Residential District-2 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,j,k,l, m,o R-3 Two-Family Residential District 9,000 75 120 25 10 20 2 35 60% h,j,k,l, m,o R-4 Apartment/Multi-Family Residential District 43,560 400 100 25 10 20 2 50 75% a,b,j,k, l,m, R-5 Middle Density District 10,890 - - 25 10 10 2 35 80% h,j,k,l, m, q R-6 Single-Family Residential District-6 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n,o R-7 Single-Family Residential District-7 6,600 60 110 25 10 20 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n,o R-A Single-Family- Residential/Agriculture 21,780 - - 25 25 25 2 35 50% h,k,l, m,n GH Garden Home Residential District 5,000 50 100 10 10 10 2 35 75% c,d,e,f, g,k,l,m TH Townhome District 2,500 25 100 25 10 20 2 35 75% h,j,k,l, m MHS Manufactured Home Subdivision District 6,600 60 110 25 10 20 2 35 50% j,k,l, m,o MHP Manufactured Home Park District 43,560 - - 25 12.5 25 - 35 50% j,k,l,m AD Agricultural District 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% h,k,o Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 3 of 6 MSMU Main Street Mixed Use 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 2 35 80% h,j,k,m, n,p MSMU-ND Main Street Mixed Use-New Development 5,000 50 100 10 5 10 2 35 80% j,k,m,p Key: a. Maximum density shall not exceed 35 units per acre. b. 2 parking spaces per unit plus 5%. c. Zero lot line Garden Homes. d. 20-foot paved alley for ingress/egress to all rear garages. e. 5-foot shall be designated maintenance easement. f. Corner lot shall have 10-foot side yard setback from street right-of-way. g. 25-foot set back to property line adjoining public street. h. Corner lot shall have minimum 15-foot side yard setback from street right-of-way. For properties on Main Street, the City Engineer may authorize a reduction to no less than 10' if there are no sight distance issues. i. Minimum lot area for each unit. j. Site Plan approval required. k. Swimming pools count toward the maximum impervious cover limitations, unless the swimming pool is equipped with a water overflow device appropriate for such pool, and only if it drains into any pervious surface, in which case the water surface shall be excluded. l. No variances may be permitted to exceed the maximum impervious cover limitations m. Refer to Article 14, section 21.14.3 for additional design requirements n. All single family residential dwelling units constructed within this district shall be constructed with an enclosed garage. o. Side yard setback of 7.5 ft. for R-1, R-2, R-3, R-6, R-7, and MHS continues in effect for all subdivisions vested on the date of adoption of Ordinance No. 11-S-15. p. Not subject to the requirements in section 21.10.4 q. Refer to section 21.5.7.B.8 Table 21.5.7.B DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS NON-RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (d) Minimum Lot Size And Dimensions Minimum Yard Setback (Ft) Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 4 of 6 Code Zoning District Area Sq. Ft. Width Ft. Depth Ft. Front Ft. Rear Adj Non- Res Zone Rear Adj. Res Zone Side Adj Non- Res Zone Side Adj Res Zone Max Ht. Ft. Max Imperv Cover Key OP Office/ Professional 6,000 60 100 25 0 25 0 25 35 70% a, b, c, d NS Neighborhood Services 10,000 100 100 25a 0 25 0 25 35 80% a, b, c, d GB General Business 10,000 100 100 25 0 25 0 25 120 80% a, b, c, d GB-2 General Business-2 10,000 100 100 25 0 25 0 25 120 80% a, b, c, d M-1 Light Manufacturing 10,000 100 100 25 0 50c 0 25b 120 80% a, b, c, d M-2 Heavy Manufacturing 10,000 100 100 25 0 50c 0 25b 120 80% a, b, c, d PUB Public Use District 10,000 100 100 25 0 15 0 25 35 70% a, c, d Key: a. See Article 10 for parking requirements. b. Uses may require a Specific Use Permit. The City of Schertz will follow the guidelines outlined in the Air Installation Compatible Use Zone (AICUZ) study for Randolph Air Force Base. c. No variances may be permitted to exceed the maximum impervious cover limitations. d. Refer to Article 14, Sec. 21.14.3 for additional design requirements. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 5 of 6 B. Additional Dimensional and Development Standards. 1. All lots developed for residential purposes shall comply with the lot area, minimum setbacks and height requirements established in table 21.5.7A for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is/are located. All lots developed for allowed non-residential purposes, within residential zoning districts, shall comply with lot, area and height requirements established in table 21.5.7A for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is/are located. 2. All lots developed for non-residential purposes shall comply with lot, area, minimum setbacks, and maximum height requirements established for the zoning district(s) in which the lot(s) is located, as established in table 21.5.7B. 3. All lots shall have at least the minimum area, width and depth as indicated in the tables 21.5.7A and 21.5.7B in this section. 4. Platted subdivisions established by a duly approved plat filed prior to adoption of this UDC shall be exempt from meeting any new lot width, depth, and/or square footage requirements. 5. No lot existing at the time of passage of this UDC shall be reduced in size below the minimum area requirements set forth in tables 21.5.7A and 21.5.7B. 6. Minimum lot size requirements shall not apply to previously platted lots that are annexed into the City, but shall apply in the event of a vacation and replat of such property. All other requirements of this UDC shall nevertheless apply. 7. No portion of any building on a residential lot may be located on any lot closer to any lot line or to the street right-of-way line than is authorized in table 21.5.7A set forth in this section unless otherwise listed below: a. Where the frontage on one (1) side of a street is divided by two (2) or more zoning districts, the front yard setback shall comply with the requirements of most restrictive district for the entire frontage between the nearest intersecting streets. b. Where the building setback line has been established by plat and exceeds the requirements of this UDC, the more restrictive setback line shall apply. c. The front yard setback shall be measured from the property line to the front face of the building, covered porch, covered terrace, or attached accessory building. Eaves and roof extensions may project into the required front yard, not to exceed two (2) feet. d. Side Yards: Every part of a required side yard shall be open and unobstructed except for accessory buildings as permitted herein and the ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices and other architectural features projecting not to exceed twelve (12) inches into the required side yard, and roof eaves projecting not to exceed twenty-four (24) inches into the required side yard. e. Rear Yards: Every part of a required rear yard shall be open and unobstructed, except for accessory buildings, uses and structures as permitted and the ordinary projections of window sills, belt courses, cornices and roof overhangs and other architectural features projecting not to exceed twenty-four (24) inches into the required rear yard. f. Where lots have double frontage, running from one street to another, a required front yard setback shall be provided on both streets. g. Mixed Use Building: In a building serving dwelling and other uses, in any district, the height and area regulations applicable to non-residential buildings shall apply. Created: 2023-07-18 12:49:28 [EST] (Supp. No. 7) Page 6 of 6 h. There shall not be more than one (1) residential dwelling on a platted lot of a duly recorded plat of a single-family residential use. 8. Middle Density District (R-5) developments may have unique designs and dimensions. Due to this, the following additional standards apply. These standards pertain to the side building separation space with the intent for fire safety: a. When HVAC units are not within the building separation space the minimum separation is ten (10) feet. b. When HVAC units are within the building separation space, or either structure is above one story, the minimum separation is fifteen (15) feet. c. HVAC units shall be on opposite sides of buildings. d. These additional standards are not required if fire suppression systems are installed within the buildings. (Ord. No. 13-S-22 , § 3, 7-16-2013; Ord. No. 14-S-47 , § 3, 11-18-2014; Ord. No. 21-S-26 , § 1(Exh. A), 7-6-2021) PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 03/05/2025 Agenda Item 8 A   SUBJECT Current Projects and City Council Status Update   DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The following is being provided for information purposes only so that the Planning and Zoning Commission is aware of the current status of new site plan applications, status of applications heard by the Commission and recommended for final action by the City Council, and the status of administratively approved applications.  NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: The following new Site Plan Applications were submitted from January 30, 2025 to February 27, 2025:   City of Schertz Fleet Building- Parking Lot   27 Commercial Place Expansion of the existing paved surface to create a larger parking lot.  CITY COUNCIL RESULTS: The following development applications were recommended for final action to the City Council.  Ordinance 25-S-004 - Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11, Section 21.11.6 Prohibited Signs and Section 21.11.17 Temporary Signs.   Direction provided but no action taken at the February 18th City Council meeting. The proposed changes will be incorporated into an upcoming Article 11 rewrite.  Ordinance 25-S-007 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow Automobile Repairs and Service, Major in General Business District (GB), on approximately 0.4 acres of land, more specifically known as a portion of Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 121092, generally located 1,092 feet southwest of the intersection of IH-35 N Access Road and FM 1103, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Recommendation of Approval at the February 5, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.  Scheduled for the March 4, 2025 City Council meeting.  Ordinance 25-S-008 – Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 4.3 acres of land from Manufacturing – Light District (M-1) and Single-Family Residential District (R-6) to General Business District (GB) known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas  Recommendation of Approval at the February 5, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.  Scheduled for the March 4, 2025 City Council meeting.  Ordinance 25-S-009 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request for a Specific Use Permit to allow a Nursery, Major on approximately 4.3 acres of land known as Comal County Property Identification Number 75307, also known as 7444 FM 482, City of Schertz, Comal County, Texas  Recommendation of Approval at the February 5, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.  Scheduled for the March 4, 2025 City Council meeting.  Ordinance 25-S-010 – Conduct a public hearing and consider amendments to the City of Schertz Comprehensive Plan to incorporate updated Water and Wastewater Master Plans  Recommendation of Approval at the January 22, 2025 Planning and Zoning Commission meeting.  Scheduled for the March 4, 2025 City Council meeting.  ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED PROJECTS: The following projects were administratively approved from January 30, 2025 to February 27, 2025:   Extra Space Storage- Site Plan Application  17720 Verde Parkway  A multi-level 95,310-square-foot climate-controlled public storage facility.  17304 Bell North Drive- Warehouse- Site Plan Application   7,200 sqaure foot warehouse City of Schertz Fleet Building- Parking Lot- Site Plan Application    27 Commercial Place Expansion of the existing paved surface to create a larger parking lot.  Parklands Unit 3A: Final Plat Extension   Final Plat creating 36 single-family residential lots  Final Plat extension with a new expiration date of October 27, 2025.