Loading...
PZ and CIAC 06-04-2025 Agenda with Associated Documents          MEETING AGENDA Schertz Capital Improvement Advisory Committee AND Planning & Zoning Commission June 4, 2025                                   HAL BALDWIN MUNICIPAL COMPLEX COUNCIL CHAMBERS 1400 SCHERTZ PARKWAY BUILDING #4 SCHERTZ, TEXAS 78154 CITY OF SCHERTZ CORE VALUES Do the right thing Do the best you can Treat others the way you want to be treated Work cooperatively as a team    AGENDA WEDNESDAY, JUNE 4, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold the regularly scheduled meeting at 6:00p.m., Wednesday, June 4, 2025, at the City Council Chambers. In lieu of attending the meeting in person, residents will have the opportunity to watch the meeting via live stream on the City's YouTube Channel.        1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Capital Improvement Advisory Committee. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Committee of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.PUBLIC HEARING:     A.Hold a public hearing, consider, and file the past two semi-annual reports evaluating the progress of the City on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees.   5.ADJOURNMENT OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING      1.CALL TO ORDER / ROLL CALL THE REGULAR PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION MEETING      Planning & Zoning                                   June 4, 2025 Page 1 of 3  2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED      3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered.      4.CONSENT AGENDA:     A.Minutes for the May 7, 2025 Regular Meeting.     5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests and replats within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.      A.PLZC20250105 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas   B.PLZC20240315 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 173 acres of land from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310012, 309425, 309427, generally located 1,000 feet to the west of Cibolo Creek on Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas   C.PLUDC20250123- Conduct a public hearing, workshop, and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 8 Section 21.8.9 - Outdoor Display and Storage.    6.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:     A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda      B.Announcements by Commissioners  City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended      C.Announcements by City Staff.  City and community events attended and to be attended.      7.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR      A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update Planning & Zoning                                   June 4, 2025 Page 2 of 3  A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update     8.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING      CERTIFICATION I, Daisy Marquez, Planner, of the City of Schertz, Texas, do hereby certify that the above agenda was posted on the official bulletin boards on this the 29th day of May, 2025 at 5:00 p.m., which is a place readily accessible to the public at all times and that said notice was posted in accordance with chapter 551, Texas Government Code.  Daisy Marquez, Planner I certify that the attached notice and agenda of items to be considered by the Schertz Planning & Zoning Commission was removed from the official bulletin board on _____day of _______________, 2025. _______________title:_____________ This facility is accessible in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Handicapped parking spaces are available. If you require special assistance or have a request for sign interpretative services or other services please call 619-1030 at least 24 hours in advance of meeting. The Planning and Zoning Commission for the City of Schertz reserves the right to adjourn into executive session at any time during the course of this meeting to discuss any of the matters listed above, as authorized by the Texas Open Meetings Act. Executive Sessions Authorized: This agenda has been reviewed and approved by the City’s legal counsel and presence of any subject in any Executive Session portion of the agenda constitutes a written interpretation of Texas Government Code Chapter 551 by legal counsel for the governmental body and constitutes an opinion by the attorney that the items discussed therein may be legally discussed in the closed portion of the meeting considering available opinions of a court of record and opinions of the Texas Attorney General known to the attorney. This provision has been added to this agenda with the intent to meet all elements necessary to satisfy Texas Government Code Chapter 551.144(c) and the meeting is conducted by all participants in reliance on this opinion.  Planning & Zoning                                   June 4, 2025 Page 3 of 3  CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Capital Improvement Advisory Committee PREPARED BY:Kathryn Woodlee, City Engineer SUBJECT:Hold a public hearing, consider, and file the past two semi-annual reports evaluating the progress of the City on achieving the capital improvements program and identifying any problems in implementing the plans or administering the capital recovery fees. GENERAL INFORMATION Section 395.058 (c) (4) of the Texas Local Government Code requires the Capital Improvements Advisory Committee (CIAC) to file semi-annual reports with respect to the progress of the capital improvement plan and report to City Council any perceived inequities in implementing the plan or imposing impact fees.  Section 90-158 of the City's Code of Ordinances includes the same requirement. Active projects and associated expenses that are funded at least in part using Impact Fee Funds the periods of the second half of fiscal year 2023-2024 and the first half of fiscal year 2024-2025 were as follows: Water  Corbett Ground Storage Tank  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  $2,902,306.94  Professional services - $11,971.71 Construction - $2,890,335.23 Status:  Construction ongoing 1st Half FY25:   Expenses:  $2,255,047.44  Professional services - $5,120.00 Construction - $2,249,927.44 Status:  Construction ongoing - Completion expected Fall 2025 City-wide Water Master Plan and Impact Fee Update Study  2nd half FY24  Expenses:  $25,789.18  Computer Fees & Licenses - $5,640.00 Professional services - $20,149.18 Status:  Capital Improvement Plan finalized and cost estimates prepared 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $11,739.40 Status:  Financial analyses, calculation of maximum assessable rates, first presentations of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and maximum rates and rates to be charged Ware Seguin to Lower Seguin and Graytown to Pfeil Loop Lines  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  Professional Services - $7,300.77 Status:  Design and easement acquisition efforts continuing 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional Services - $14,334.56 Status:  Easement acquisition efforts continuing - several parcel payments pending Sewer  Woman Hollering Creek Wastewater Project  2nd Half FY24  Expenses:  $1,002,285.95  Professional services - $119,253.91 Construction - $883,032.04 Status:  Construction nearing completion - lift station testing occurring - startup projected 1st half FY25 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  $622,023.69  Professional services - $50,020.38 Construction - $572,003.31 Status:  Lift station put into operation March 3, 2025 - Final completion of project expected Summer/Fall 2025 City-wide Wastewater Master Plan and Impact Fee Update Study  2nd half FY24  Expenses:  $25,789.17  Computer Fees & Licenses - $5,640.00 Professional services - $20,149.17 Status:  Capital Improvement Plan finalized and cost estimates prepared 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $11,739.40 Status:  Financial analyses, calculation of maximum assessable rates, first presentations of Land Use Assumptions, Capital Improvement Plans, and maximum rates and rates to be charged Cibolo West Wastewater Trunk Main  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses - project not started 1st Half FY25  Expenses:  Professional services - $27,943.00 Status:  Route Study underway Roadway  Service Area 1  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses 1st Half FY25 - No Expenses Service Area 2  Expenses 1st Half FY24 - $54,976.89 annual partial reimbursement to Babcock Road 165, Ltd., for cost of Ripps Kreusler extension ($92,794.75 remaining to be paid) Service Areas 3 and 4  2nd Half FY24 - No Expenses 1st Half FY25 - No Expenses     STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the CIAC accept this report and file the semi-annual reports for the 2nd half of FY24 and the 1st half of FY25 with City Council.  The semi-annual reports will consist of the items presented to the CIAC and draft minutes from this meeting. Attachments Capital Recovery Financials 2nd Half FY24  Capital Recovery Financials 1st Half FY25  CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT April 1, 2024 TO September 30, 2024 ************** IMPACTS FEES ************** Water Sewer Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1 3,000,909.18 972,867.57 3,973,776.75 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees (2,902,306.94)(64,220.81)#(3,888,462.61) Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 98,602.24 908,646.76 #1,007,249.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,103,989.08 1,445,725.97 7,549,715.05 Revenues: Impact Fees 683,074.00 635,932.68 1,319,006.68 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 1,165.90 8,153.03 9,318.93 Investments Income 173,899.71 125,507.99 299,407.70 Expenses: Computer Fees & Licenses 5,640.00 5,640.00 Professional Services 20,149.18 20,149.18 40,298.36 Auditor/Accounting Services 1,000.00 1,000.00 2,000.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 1,444,222.00 1,444,222.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 831,350.43 (701,417.48)129,932.95 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,935,339.51 744,308.49 7,679,648.00 Estimated Cost of Unfunded Projects Loop Lines 1,125,000.00 Capital Impact Fee Study 11,739.40 25,093.25 Cibolo West Trunk Line 16,213,000.00 Total Unfunded Project Costs 1,136,739.40 16,238,093.25 17,374,832.65 Unfunded Projects to Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 2 5,798,600.11 (15,493,784.76)(9,695,184.65) 1 2 Negative Unfunded Projects to Ending Impact Fee Balance to be funded by future revenues or through other sources Allocated Impact Fee Balances only include Capital Recovery funds and not funds from any other source. It also assumes Capital Recovery Funds are used first when allocated. Capital Improvements Program SE Quad Pump Station SE Quad GST SE Quad Elevated Tank SE Quad Distribution Mains NE Quad Distribution Mains IH10 Corridor Distribution Mains Original Cost Estimate 1,688,289$ 1,100,000$ 1,250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,000,000$ Current Project Designation Corbett Ground Storage Tank Corbett Ground Storage Tank- RL2 Corbett Elevated Tank - RL1 Loop Lines - WA1 Current Cost Estimate 5,000,000$ 5,650,000$ 4,641,302$ Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 12,251.14$ 2014 500.00$ 2015 86,166.10$ 2016 3,050,000.00$ 2017 2018 2019 1,375,000.00$ 2020 2021 512,000.00$ 2022 4,230,818.70$ Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ 4,742,818.70$ 4,523,917.24$ -$ -$ -$ Other Funding Sources -$ 364,092.72$ 633,024.89$ 1,146,643.35$ -$ -$ Total Project Funding Sources -$ 5,106,911.42$ 5,156,942.13$ 1,146,643.35$ -$ -$ Project Annual Expenses Second Half 2013 12,251.14$ First Half 2014 6.77$ Second Half 2014 2,081.13$ First Half 2015 980.00$ Second Half 2015 120,233.32$ First Half 2016 87,843.28$ Second Half 2016 22,763.75$ First Half 2017 -$ Second Half 2017 40,403.20$ First Half 2018 6,248.00$ Second Half 2018 7,485.13$ First Half 2019 50,510.63$ Second Half 2019 1,994,741.24$ First Half 2020 1,385,858.48$ Second Half 2020 1,161,122.42$ First Half 2021 172,980.16$ Second Half 2021 114,254.48$ 91,433.48$ First Half 2022 154,707.22$ Second Half 2022 124,820.80$ First Half 2023 21,629.11$ 40,455.00$ Second Half 2023 641,187.27$ 80,810.00$ First Half 2024 685,310.64$ 5,823.00$ Second Half 2024 2,902,306.94$ 7,300.77$ Total Expenses -$ 4,644,216.46$ 5,156,942.13$ 134,388.77$ -$ -$ Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance -$ 98,602.24$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Balance -$ 462,694.96$ -$ 1,012,254.58$ -$ -$ Project Status Future On Going Complete On Going Future Future Capital Recovery Water Projects Capital Improvements Program Original Cost Estimate Current Project Designation Current Cost Estimate Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ -$ -$ 626,828.54$ 9,655,000.00$ -$ Other Funding Sources Bond 2007 931,739.74$ Bond 2013 3,069,305.46$ Total Project Funding Sources Project Annual Expenses First Half 2012 Second Half 2012 First Half 2013 Second Half 2013 First Half 2014 Second Half 2014 First Half 2015 Second Half 2015 First Half 2016 Second Half 2016 First Half 2017 Second Half 2017 First Half 2018 Second Half 2018 First Half 2019 Second Half 2019 First Half 2020 Second Half 2020 First Half 2021 Second Half 2021 First Half 2022 Second Half 2022 First Half 2023 Second Half 2023 First Half 2024 Second Half 2024 Total Expenses Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance Project Balance Project Status 1,002,285.95$ -$ -$ 462,515.44$ -$ -$ Capital Recovery Sewer Projects Final South Sewershed Master Plan Town Creek Phase III Town Creek Phase IV Woman Hollering Creek STP PH II South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station Town Creek Phase III - QA3 Crossvines Batch Plant Expansion - QA4 Woman Hollering Trunk Line - QA2/Q01 Cibolo West Trunk Line - WA1 15,000$ 659,126$ 1,000,000$ 600,000$ 9,600,000$ 931,740$ 487,848$ 12,000,000$ 16,213,000.0$ 487,848.00$ -$ 7,795,000.00$ 12,724,305.46$ 626,828.54$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ -$ -$ 980.00$ 50,676.07$ -$ 82,262.17$ -$ 46,690.62$ 74,054.70$ -$ 28,743.00$ 6,642.30$ -$ 815,683.00$ 26,911.24$ -$ 5,858.72$ -$ 10,268.18$ 33,784.40$ 27,210.41$ 11,105.00$ 121,481.22$ 83,940.36$ 157,004.53$ 212,479.83$ 247,870.62$ 1,703,004.22$ 3,886,885.47$ -$ 10,175.48$ 56,860.59$ 235,360.91$ -$ -$ -$ 16,123.52$ 3,715,891.65$ Future Complete Future On Going On Going Future -$ -$ -$ 185,891.64$ 722,755.12$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 185,891.64$ 722,755.12$ -$ 12,001,550.34$ -$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 440,936.90$ 138,980.54$ 1,860,000.00$ -$ 6,615.06$ 6,000.00$ 85,555.02$ 143,307.30$ CITY OF SCHERTZ ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REPORT April 1, 2024 TO September 30, 2024 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,294,044.60 753,948.21 2,042,470.20 6,584.23 4,097,047.24 Revenues: Impact Fees 244,305.76 72,736.78 124,690.00 0.00 441,732.54 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 432.79 136.03 430.19 0.05 999.06 Investments Income 36,964.82 21,240.79 56,629.77 180.81 115,016.19 Expenses: Development Incentive Fund 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RightOfWay/Easements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 281,703.37 94,113.60 181,749.96 180.86 557,747.79 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,575,747.97 848,061.81 2,224,220.16 6,765.09 4,654,795.03 ******************** ROADWAY IMPACTS FEES ******************** CITY OF SCHERTZ CAPITAL RECOVERY IMPACT FEE REPORT October 1, 2024 TO March 31, 2025 ************** IMPACTS FEES ************** Water Sewer Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1 1,806,249.76 908,646.76 2,714,896.52 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees (98,602.24)(349,966.69)(448,568.93) Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 1,707,647.52 558,680.07 #2,266,327.59 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 6,935,339.51 744,308.49 7,549,715.05 Revenues: Impact Fees 746,981.38 370,296.00 1,117,277.38 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 1,794.53 31,605.37 33,399.90 Investments Income 167,350.76 61,944.78 229,295.54 Expenses: Computer Fees & Licenses 0.00 0.00 Professional Services 11,739.40 11,739.40 23,478.80 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 Investment Mgt Fee - Sewer 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 50,000.00 0.00 50,000.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 854,387.27 452,106.75 1,306,494.02 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 7,789,726.78 1,196,415.24 8,986,142.02 Estimated Cost of Unfunded Projects Loop Lines 1,125,000.00 Cibolo West Trunk Line 15,913,000.00 Total Unfunded Project Costs 1,125,000.00 15,913,000.00 17,038,000.00 Unfunded Projects to Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 2 6,664,726.78 (14,716,584.76)(8,051,857.98) 1 2 Negative Unfunded Projects to Ending Impact Fee Balance to be funded by future revenues or through other sources Allocated Impact Fee Balances only include Capital Recovery funds and not funds from any other source. It also assumes Capital Recovery Funds are used first when allocated. Capital Improvements Program SE Quad Pump Station SE Quad GST SE Quad Elevated Tank SE Quad Distribution Mains NE Quad Distribution Mains IH10 Corridor Distribution Mains Original Cost Estimate 1,688,289$ 1,100,000$ 1,250,000$ 1,700,000$ 1,600,000$ 1,000,000$ Current Project Designation Corbett Ground Storage Tank Corbett Ground Storage Tank- RL2 Corbett Elevated Tank - RL1 Loop Lines - WA1 Current Cost Estimate 5,000,000$ 5,650,000$ 4,641,302$ Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 12,251.14$ 2014 500.00$ 2015 86,166.10$ 2016 3,050,000.00$ 2017 2018 2019 1,375,000.00$ 2020 2021 512,000.00$ 2022 4,230,818.70$ Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ 4,742,818.70$ 4,523,917.24$ -$ -$ -$ Grants -$ 3,500,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Other Funding Sources -$ 364,092.72$ 633,024.89$ 1,181,593.09$ -$ -$ Total Project Funding Sources -$ 8,606,911.42$ 5,156,942.13$ 1,181,593.09$ -$ -$ Project Annual Expenses Second Half 2013 12,251.14$ First Half 2014 6.77$ Second Half 2014 2,081.13$ First Half 2015 980.00$ Second Half 2015 120,233.32$ First Half 2016 87,843.28$ Second Half 2016 22,763.75$ First Half 2017 -$ Second Half 2017 40,403.20$ First Half 2018 6,248.00$ Second Half 2018 7,485.13$ First Half 2019 50,510.63$ Second Half 2019 1,994,741.24$ First Half 2020 1,385,858.48$ Second Half 2020 1,161,122.42$ First Half 2021 172,980.16$ Second Half 2021 114,254.48$ 91,433.48$ First Half 2022 154,707.22$ Second Half 2022 124,820.80$ First Half 2023 21,629.11$ 40,455.00$ Second Half 2023 641,187.27$ 80,810.00$ First Half 2024 685,310.64$ 5,823.00$ Second Half 2024 2,902,306.94$ 7,300.77$ First Half 2025 2,255,047.44$ 14,334.56$ Total Expenses -$ 6,899,263.90$ 5,156,942.13$ 148,723.33$ -$ -$ Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance -$ 1,707,647.52$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Project Balance -$ -$ -$ 1,032,869.76$ -$ -$ Project Status Future On Going Complete On Going Future Future Capital Recovery Water Projects Capital Improvements Program Original Cost Estimate Current Project Designation Current Cost Estimate Capital Recovery Funding/Allocation 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2024 2025 Capital Recovery Funding Balance -$ -$ -$ 440,936.90$ 9,840,891.64$ 300,000.00$ Other Funding Sources Bond 2007 931,739.74$ Bond 2013 3,069,305.46$ Total Project Funding Sources Project Annual Expenses First Half 2012 Second Half 2012 First Half 2013 Second Half 2013 First Half 2014 Second Half 2014 First Half 2015 Second Half 2015 First Half 2016 Second Half 2016 First Half 2017 Second Half 2017 First Half 2018 Second Half 2018 First Half 2019 Second Half 2019 First Half 2020 Second Half 2020 First Half 2021 Second Half 2021 First Half 2022 Second Half 2022 First Half 2023 Second Half 2023 First Half 2024 Second Half 2024 First Half 2025 Total Expenses Allocated Impact Project Fee Balance Project Balance Project Status 27,943.00$ 622,023.69$ -$ (185,891.64)$ 185,891.64$ 300,000.00$ 138,980.54$ 1,860,000.00$ -$ 6,615.06$ 6,000.00$ 85,555.02$ 143,307.30$ -$ -$ -$ 0.00$ 286,623.07$ 272,057.00$ 12,623,574.03$ 27,943.00$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 440,936.90$ Future Complete Future Complete On Going On Going -$ -$ -$ -$ 286,623.07$ 272,057.00$ 1,703,004.22$ 3,886,885.47$ -$ 10,175.48$ 56,860.59$ 235,360.91$ -$ -$ -$ 16,123.52$ 3,715,891.65$ 157,004.53$ 212,479.83$ 247,870.62$ 10,268.18$ 33,784.40$ 27,210.41$ 11,105.00$ 121,481.22$ 83,940.36$ 815,683.00$ 26,911.24$ -$ 5,858.72$ -$ 46,690.62$ 74,054.70$ -$ 28,743.00$ 6,642.30$ -$ 980.00$ 50,676.07$ -$ 82,262.17$ -$ -$ 12,910,197.10$ 440,936.90$ -$ 931,739.74$ -$ 300,000.00$ -$ 7,795,000.00$ 487,848.00$ 931,740$ 440,937$ 12,000,000$ 16,213,000.0$ 1,002,285.95$ -$ -$ 462,515.44$ -$ -$ Capital Recovery Sewer Projects Final South Sewershed Master Plan Town Creek Phase III Town Creek Phase IV Woman Hollering Creek STP PH II South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station South Schertz Trunk Lines and Lift Station Town Creek Phase III - QA3 Crossvines Batch Plant Expansion - QA4 Woman Hollering Trunk Line - QA2/Q01 Cibolo West Trunk Line - WA1 15,000$ 659,126$ 1,000,000$ 600,000$ 9,600,000$ CITY OF SCHERTZ ROADWAY IMPACT FEE REPORT October 1, 2024 TO March 31, 2025 Area 1 Area 2 Area 3 Area 4 Total Beginning Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Net Change in Allocted Impact Fees 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ending Allocated Impact Fee Balance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Beginning Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,575,747.97 848,061.81 2,224,220.16 6,765.09 4,654,795.03 Revenues: Impact Fees 120,814.74 3,370.00 225,790.00 0.00 349,974.74 Transfer In 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Interest Earned 308.72 81.49 201.05 0.06 591.32 Investments Income 38,748.79 19,439.00 54,268.83 160.73 112,617.35 Expenses: Development Incentive Fund 0.00 54,976.89 0.00 0.00 54,976.89 Professional Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Auditor/Accounting Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Transferred Out 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Contingency 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Construction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 RightOfWay/Easements 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total Revenue Over/(Under) Expense 159,872.25 (32,086.40)280,259.88 160.79 408,206.52 Ending Unallocated Impact Fee Balance 1,735,620.22 815,975.41 2,504,480.04 6,925.88 5,063,001.55 ******************** ROADWAY IMPACTS FEES ******************** PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 4 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:Minutes for the May 7, 2025 Regular Meeting.   Attachments Minutes for the May 7, 2025  D R A F T PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES May 7, 2025 The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened on May 7, 2025 at 6:00 p.m. at the Municipal Complex, Council Chambers, 1400 Schertz Parkway Building #4, Schertz, Texas. Present: Glen Outlaw, Chairman; Richard Braud, Vice Chairman; Roderick Hector, Commissioner; John Carbon, Commissioner; Patrick McMaster, Commissioner; Judy Goldick, Commissioner; Clayton Wallace, Commissioner Absent: Tamara Brown, Commissioner; David Hughes, Commissioner Staff present: Brian James, Deputy City Manager; Lesa Wood, Director of Panning & Community; Emily Delgado, Planning Manager; Samuel Haas, Senior Planner; Daisy Marquez, Planner; William Willingham, Planner; Sarah Rodriguez, Administrative Assistant              1.CALL TO ORDER Chairman Outlaw called the meeting to order at 6:00 P.M.   2.SEAT ALTERNATE TO ACT IF REQUIRED Clayton Wallace was seated as an alternate.   3.HEARING OF RESIDENTS This time is set aside for any person who wishes to address the Planning and Zoning Commission. Each person should fill out the Speaker’s register prior to the meeting. Presentations should be limited to no more than three (3) minutes. Discussion by the Commission of any item not on the agenda shall be limited to statements of specific factual information given in response to any inquiry, a recitation of existing policy in response to an inquiry, and/or a proposal to place the item on a future agenda. The presiding officer, during the Hearing of Residents portion of the agenda, will call on those persons who have signed up to speak in the order they have registered. There were no residents who spoke.   4.CONSENT AGENDA:   A.Minutes for the April 2, 2025 Regular Meeting. There was no discussion.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to approve, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   5.PUBLIC HEARING: 5.PUBLIC HEARING: The Planning and Zoning Commission will hold a public hearing related to zone change requests, specific use permit requests, and Unified Development Code Amendments within this agenda. The public hearing will be opened to receive a report from staff, the applicant, the adjoining property owners affected by the applicant’s request, and any other interested persons. Upon completion, the public hearing will be closed. The Commission will discuss and consider the application, and may request additional information from staff or the applicant, if required. After deliberation, the Commission is asked to consider and act upon the following requests and make a recommendation to the City Council if necessary.   A.PLZC20250055 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 4.15 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to General Business District-2 (GB-2), generally known as 46 Maske Road and 44 Maske Road, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 of the Maske Road Business Park Subdivision, more specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 199116, and 199117. Mr. Willingham gave a presentation on PLZC20250055. The applicant spoke, Jesus Lozano. Chairman Outlaw opened up the Public Hearing at 6:14 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:14 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval to City Council, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   B.PLZC20250080- Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 20 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE), Agricultural District (AD), and Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2), generally located approximately 4,800 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Road, known as 12816 Lower Seguin Rd and 12746 Lower Seguin Road, and more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310027, 310026, and 310028, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLZC20250080. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:27 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:27 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Patrick McMaster to recommend approval to City Council, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   C.PLZC20250043 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to    C.PLZC20250043 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 62 acres of land from Planned Development District (PDD) and Pre-Development District (PRE) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2), generally located approximately 3,800 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Trainer Hale Road, known as Bexar County Property Identification number 310054 ,a portion of 310053 and a portion of 310061, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas. Mrs. Marquez gave a presentation on PLZC20250043. The applicant spoke, Ashley Fairmond. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 6:38 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 6:39 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval to City Council, seconded by Commissioner Patrick McMaster  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   D.PLUDC20250090 - Conduct a public hearing, workshop and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinances, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 11 - Sign and Advertising Devices, Article 3 Boards, Commissions, and Committees - Section 21.3.3 - Planning and Zoning Commission, Article 7 - Nonconforming Uses, Lots, and Structures, and Article 16 - Definitions. Mr. Haas gave a presentation on PLUDC20250090. Chairman Outlaw opened the Public Hearing at 7:14 P.M. No one spoke. Chairman Outlaw closed the Public Hearing at 7:15 P.M.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to recommend approval to City Council with changes as discussed, seconded by Commissioner Patrick McMaster  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   6.ITEMS FOR INDIVIDUAL CONSIDERATION: Items 6A-6D were heard prior to action on 5D. PLUDC20250090.   A.PLPP20250053 Waiver - Consider and act upon a request for a waiver in relation to on-site sewer facilities for the preliminary plat of the Burnette Subdivision, approximately 1.821 acres of land, located at 12396 Schaeffer Road, Schertz, Texas, 78108, more specifically known as Bexar County Parcel Identification Number 308385. Mr. Willingham gave a presentation on PLPP20250053 Waiver.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to approve PLPP20250053 Waiver, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   B.PLPP20250053 - Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the    B.PLPP20250053 - Consider and act upon a request for approval of a preliminary plat of the Burnette Subdivision, approximately 1.89 acres of land located at 12396 Schaeffer Road, Schertz, Texas, 78108, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 308385. Mr. Willingham gave a presentation on PLPP20250053.       Motioned by Commissioner Clayton Wallace to approve PLPP20250053, seconded by Commissioner Patrick McMaster  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   C.PLFP20250091 Waiver - Consider and act upon a request for a waiver in relation to on-site sewer facilities for the final plat of the Monroe Subdivision Block 1 Lot 2, approximately 12.39 acres of land, located approximately 750 feet east of the intersection of Ware-Seguin Road and Boenig Drive, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 619166. Mr. Willingham gave a presentation on PLFP20250091 Waiver.       Motioned by Commissioner John Carbon to approve PLFP20250091 Waiver, seconded by Commissioner Judy Goldick  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   D.PLFP20250091 - Consider and act upon a request for approval of a final plat of the Monroe Subdivision Lot 2 Block 1, approximately 12.39 acres of land located approximately 750 feet east of the intersection of Ware-Seguin Road and Boenig Drive, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 619166. Mr. Willingham gave a presentation on PLFP20250091.       Motioned by Commissioner Judy Goldick to approve PLFP20250091, seconded by Commissioner John Carbon  Vote: 7 - 0 Passed   7.REQUESTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS:   A.Requests by Commissioners to place items on a future Planning and Zoning Agenda Commissioner Wallace requested a workshop / discussion on the July Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting in relation tot a UDC Amendment requiring car washes to be 2-3 miles from each other.   B.Announcements by Commissioners City and community events attended and to be attended Continuing education events attended and to be attended There were announcements by Commissioners.   C.Announcements by City Staff. C.Announcements by City Staff. City and community events attended and to be attended. No announcements were made by staff.   8.INFORMATION AVAILABLE IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PACKETS- NO DISCUSSION TO OCCUR   A.Current Projects and City Council Status Update      9.ADJOURNMENT OF THE REGULAR MEETING Chairman Outlaw adjourned the regular meeting at 7:43 P.M.   ____________________________________ Chairman, Planning and Zoning Commission ______________________________ Recording Secretary, City of Schertz PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 5 A   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner SUBJECT:PLZC20250105 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 19 acres of land from Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Number 68302, and 68303, also known as 19018 Old Wiederstein Road, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas BACKGROUND Per the applicant letter of intent, the property requesting a rezone is approximately 19 acres of land from Single Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Middle Density Residential District (R-5), with a proposal to be developed into multifamily style senior housing with a proposed density of 7.65 DU (dwelling units) per acre.  On May 23, 2025, nineteen (19) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding property owners within a 200-foot boundary of the subject property and the Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City Independent School District (SCUCISD). At the time of the Staff Report, two (2) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and three (3) responses in opposition have been received. A public hearing notice will be published in the "San Antonio Express" prior to the City Council Meeting. Additionally, a sign was placed on the subject property by the applicant. Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A)Residence / Open Space Proposed Middle Denisty Residential District (R-5)Multi-Family Apartment Dwelling Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North General Business District (GB), Public Use District (PUB) Single-Family Residential / Agricultural (R-A) Undeveloped and Elevated Water Storage Tank (Civic Use) South Right-of-Way Old Wiederstein Road East Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) and General Business District (GB) Residence and Undeveloped West Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A)Residence GOAL The goal is to rezone this property to Middle Density Residential District (R-5) to be developed into multifamily style senior housing with a proposed density of 7.65 DU (dwelling units) per acre.  However, it should be noted that while the applicant intends to develop this property with a 7.65 dwelling units per acre, the zoning district does allow up to 12 dwelling units per acre for a development of this size. The zoning district also allows for attached or detached residential dwelling units and that multifamily site design requirements in Article 9 of the UDC be adhered to. Finally, the applicant must provide ten percent (10%) of the total platted area as common, usable open space.     Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size and Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code District Area SqFt Width Ft Depth Ft Front Ft Side Ft Rear Ft Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Existing R-A Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural 21,780 N/A N/A 25 25 25 2 35 50% Proposed R-5 Middle Density Residential District 10,890 N/A N/A 25 10 10 2 35 80% COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When evaluating zone changes, Staff utilizes the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.5.4.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans; The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Mixed Use Center. This designation is intended to provide a mixture of commercial and residential, with specific call-outs for higher densities. By requesting Middle Density Residential District (R-5), the applicant is meeting that higher density provision and thus implementing the policies of the Comprehensive Plan.  2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City As part of promoting health, safety, and general welfare, zone change requests should align with the Unified Development Code (UDC) and city policy. The Schertz strategic plan has stated goals and objectives for a thriving economy. Among these are to "support strategic development" and "effectively plan and manage land use". This zone change request builds on the development occurring in the wider area. To the west is a large mixed-use development called Schertz Station currently under construction. This development consists of multifamily housing and several commercial options ranging from restaurants to retail. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan details the need for Complete Communities, which "is a concept built on the premise that people should be able to go about all of their essential daily activities and needs within a short distance of their home". "Strategies to achieve this include more dense development, diversity of housing choices and land uses", the proposed zone change for the subject property helps the City achieve this goal based on what is occurring in the wider area.  Finally, the UDC states the explicit purpose to "minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings". The density that is provided by Middle Density Residential District (R-5) helps create a transitional use between the properties that are more open, rural, and less dense to the east, and the denser development occurring to the west in Schertz Station. As part of this proposed zoning request, the applicant submitted a preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) memo which the City of Schertz Engineering Department reviewed and provided the following:   A preliminary traffic analysis has been done to evaluate the potential impact the adjacent streets by the proposed zone change.  The analysis compared the maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips that could be generated from this property based on the current zoning and the maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips that could be generated form this property if the zoning was changed to the requested zoning.  The difference between these two peak hour trip totals is 54 vehicle trips.  This amount of proposed additional trips is well below the threshold for triggering a full Traffic Impact Analysis for the proposed development.  Additionally, the increased amount is generally considered a very small increase relative to the street capacity and existing traffic volumes.  Therefore, the proposed impact to the City’s transportation system by the proposed zone change would be considered negligible. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area; The immediate area consists of open space, rural residences, single-family subdivisions, and a large mixed-use development. The uses permitted in Middle Density Residential District (R-5) are detailed below.     UDC Section 21.5.8 Permitted Uses Middle Density Residential District (R-5) Permitted by Right Permitted with SUP Accessory Building, Residential Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Multi-Family Apartment Dwelling Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Attached One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Two-Family Dwelling Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship New and Unlisted Uses These uses show a focus on residential which is consistent with the immediate area.  4. Whether other factors deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. All UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change. City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have been notified of the zone change and have provided no objections to the request. SCUCISD has also been notified of the zone change request. The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. RECOMMENDATION Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, the proposal's alignment with the UDC and city policy, and it consistency with the immediate area, Staff is recommending approval of PLZC20250105. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  Public Hearing Responses  Zoning Exhibit  SCUC ISD 10- Year Forecasting  SCUC ISD Demographic Report  !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !( U U U U U U U U U U U 61135 HERNANDEZ GILBERT 61136 SELF KENNETH R & SARA K 2 4 0 1 8 B U R N E T T L O U A 2 4 0 4 6 S P E E R G A B R I E L S H A Y N E 24 0 3 2 , 2 4 0 4 2 , 2 4 0 4 3 CI T Y O F S C H E R T Z 24053, 24054, 2 4 0 5 5 BLUM ANNIE G L I V I N G TRUST 24060 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 1 6 6 8 6 5 G O M E Z D A V I D & T E R E S A C 61134 HERNANDEZ RUBEN R 61130 HERNANDEZ GILBERT 68304 BUSCH TODD M 24044 , 2 4 0 4 4 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 6 8 3 2 4 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 68294 DENSBERGER HAROLD J 68319 DENSBERGER DIANA OTT ETAL 68330 TUDYK JOSEPH B JR 6 8 3 3 1 T U D Y K J O S E P H B J R 68302 JASEK DOUGLAS E & NOREEN A BAKER & JOHN H JASEK 68303 JASEK DOUGLAS E & NOREEN A BAKER & JOHN H JASEK 24051 , 2 4 0 5 2 CITY O F SCHE R T Z 24056 BALD E R A S J O S E GUAD A L U P E 24062 CRIDE R WHITN E Y 2 4 0 3 1 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 2 4 0 4 7 C I T Y O F S C H E R T Z 24061 MATAM O R O S VERO N I C A 24059 GONZ A L E Z GONZ A L O L 24058 ESPIN O Z A JOSE V J R 24057 GARC I A ADRIA N 24 " WL 16" W L 8" WL 8 " W L 1 2 " W L 8" WL8 " W L 8" WL 24" WL 1 6 " W L 1 6 " W L 8" W L 8" PV C SDR 3 5 8" PVC S D R 3 5 8" PV C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8" PVC SDR 3 5 8" PV C SDR 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" PV C SDR 2 6 8" PVC SDR 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C SD R 3 5 8" PVC SDR 35 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 8 " P V C S D R 3 5 2 4 " P V C S D R 2 6 R e s i d e n t i a l C o l l e c t o r ( 7 0 ' R O W ) Secon d a r y A r t e r i a l (90' R O W ) Pla n n e d S e c o n d a r y Art e r i a l ( 9 0 ' R O W ) Maxar, Microsoft Project Boundary 200' Buffer City ETJ Parcels County Boundaries Sewer Structures [Ú Lift Station (Active) [Ú Lift Station (Private) [Ú Lift Station (Schertz) !¤!2 Split Manhole 3Q Treatment Plant (CCMA) 3Q Treatment Plant (Schertz) Sewer Main Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes Water Main 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" g Unknown Streets Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Railroads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned PrincipalArterial Secondary Arterial Planned SecondaryArterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned SecondaryRural Arterial Residential Collector Planned ResidentialCollector Commercial Collector B Planned CommercialCollector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A <all other values>:0 200 400 600100Feet 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (PLZC20250105) City of S c h e r t z City of S c h e r t z City of C i b o l o City of C i b o l o O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D (6 1 1 3 5 ) 1 9 0 2 1 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 1 1 3 6 ) 2 4 0 0 TU L I P S T (2 4 0 1 8 ) 2 4 0 1 BI R C H S T (2 4 0 3 1 ) 2 4 0 8 EL M S T (2 4 0 4 6 ) 24 0 5 EL M S T (2 4 0 4 2 ) 5305 HOPE L N (24054 ) 24 0 0 BI R C H S T (2 4 0 3 2 ) 24 0 9 E L M S T (2 4 0 4 1 ) 24 0 4 EL M S T (2 4 0 4 5 ) 24 1 2 EL M S T (2 4 0 4 7 ) 1 9 0 9 4 O L D WI E D E R S T E I N R D (1 6 6 8 6 5 ) 1 8 9 6 7 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D (6 1 1 3 4 ) 1 8 9 7 5 O L D WI E D E R S T E I N R D (6 1 1 3 0 ) O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D (6 8 3 0 4 ) 2 4 0 0 E L M S T (2 4 0 4 4 ) 2 3 0 4 TU L I P S T (6 8 3 2 4 ) 2300DEN- O T T H I L L (68294) 2305DEN-O T T H I L L (68319 ) 1 8 9 4 0 O L D W I E D E R S T E I N R D (6 8 3 3 0 ) 1 8 9 4 0 O L D WI E D E R S T E I N R D ( 6 8 3 3 1 ) 19018OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (68302 & 68303) 23 2 8 T U L I P S T (2 4 0 5 3 ) 23 2 4 TU L I P S T (2 4 0 5 2 ) 5213 HOPE L N (2405 6 ) 2 3 2 0 T U L I P S T (2 4 0 5 1 ) 5209 HOPE L N (2405 7 ) 5205 HOPE L N (24058 ) 5201 HOPE L N (24059 ) 5105 HOPE L N (24061 ) 5101 HOPE L N (24062 ) 5109 HOPE L N (24059 ) 5301 HOPE L N (24054 ) 2 4 0 1 E L M S T (2 4 0 4 3 ) H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T F O X F O R D R U N D R PINE S T HOURL E S S O A K S SIR BARTO N BAY PILLO R Y P O I N T E T R I P L E C R O W N DEN-OTT H I L L ELM S T BIRCH S T OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D D E A N R D 4 0 200 400 600 800100 Feet City of Schertz 19018 OLD WIEDERSTEIN RD (PLZC20250105) Project Area 200' Buffer Municipal Boundaries “The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or impliedwarranty of any kind including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connectionwith the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodicalchanges may be made and information may be added to the information herein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s)described herein at any time.” City of Schertz, GIS Department, gis@schertz.com Last Update: May 14, 2025 GB GB GH GH GB PUB GB M-1 R-5 R-A R-A City of C i b o l o City of S c h e r t z C i t y o f C i b o l o City of S c h e r t z C i b o l o E T J CRUSA D E R B E N D PILL O R Y P O I N T E H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T WILLO W BRANC H B E L M O N T P K W Y PECAN S T SECRE T A R I A T D R PINE S T SUMM I T D R HOURL E S S O A K S SIR BA R T O N B A Y W I L L O W W O O D T R I P L E C R O W N H O P E L N DEN-OT T H I L L ROSE D R ELM S T BIRCH S T GRENADA G A I T PVT RD A T 4 8 1 D E A N R D K A Y L E E C H A S E OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D F O X F O R D R U N D R D E A N R D GB R-A M-1 GB GH GH PUB GB GB City of C i b o l o City of S c h e r t z C i t y o f C i b o l o City of S c h e r t z C i b o l o E T J CRUSA D E R B E N D PILL O R Y P O I N T E H O P E L N H O L L Y L N TULIP S T WILLO W BRANC H B E L M O N T P K W Y PECAN S T SECRE T A R I A T D R PINE S T SUMM I T D R HOURL E S S O A K S SIR BA R T O N B A Y W I L L O W W O O D T R I P L E C R O W N H O P E L N DEN-OT T H I L L ROSE D R ELM S T BIRCH S T GRENADA G A I T PVT RD A T 4 8 1 D E A N R D K A Y L E E C H A S E OLD W I E D E R S T E I N R D F O X F O R D R U N D R D E A N R D 0 200 400 600 800 1,000100Feet : (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-5) Middle Density Residential (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) Schertz Municipal Boundary City ETJ GUADALUPE COUNTY PARCEL ID: 68301 & 68302 PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSEDCURRENT *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind, including but notlimited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the informationherein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* Last update: May 14, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Department: gis@schertz.com (210) 619-1180 FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (CURRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 3Q24 Demographic Report 2 Annual Enrollment Change *Yellow Box = largest grade per year Green Box = second largest grade per year Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2024/25 384 747 849 866 1,006 1,043 1,108 1,118 1,126 1,198 1,413 1,427 1,354 1,225 14,864 Difference 60 -10 -35 29 -17 -25 13 -2 -14 34 56 -24 40 -23 82 18.5%-1.1%-3.4%2.8%-1.6%-2.2%1.1%-0.2%-1.1%2.8%4.3%-1.7%3.1%-1.8%0.5% 3-year avg.0.992 0.924 1.028 1.025 1.026 1.023 0.984 1.023 1.020 1.029 1.127 0.975 0.928 0.995 1.005 1.004 1.025 1.006 Cohorts PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Elem Int Mid High 2021/22 1.400 0.983 1.048 1.000 1.033 1.036 0.990 1.068 1.045 1.056 1.171 1.042 0.936 0.969 1.020 1.029 1.050 1.029 2022/23 0.958 0.876 1.029 1.001 1.057 1.037 0.956 1.008 1.007 1.015 1.121 0.960 0.926 0.983 1.000 0.982 1.011 0.998 2023/24 0.986 0.962 1.023 1.005 0.999 1.012 0.969 1.028 1.040 1.028 1.099 0.987 0.903 1.031 1.000 0.998 1.034 1.005 2024/25 1.033 0.935 1.033 1.068 1.023 1.021 1.028 1.034 1.014 1.046 1.162 0.978 0.955 0.971 1.016 1.031 1.030 1.017 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Oct-24 Oct-23 3 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.9 3.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p - 1 9 No v - 1 9 Ja n - 2 0 Ma r - 2 0 Ma y - 2 0 Ju l - 2 0 Se p - 2 0 No v - 2 0 Ja n - 2 1 Ma r - 2 1 Ma y - 2 1 Ju l - 2 1 Se p - 2 1 No v - 2 1 Ja n - 2 2 Ma r - 2 2 Ma y - 2 2 Ju l - 2 2 Se p - 2 2 No v - 2 2 Ja n - 2 3 Ma r - 2 3 Ma y - 2 3 Ju l - 2 3 Se p - 2 3 No v - 2 3 Ja n - 2 4 Ma r - 2 4 Ma y - 2 4 Ju l - 2 4 Se p - 2 4 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Oct 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 17,441 17,992 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q3 2015Q3 2016Q3 2017Q3 2018Q3 2019Q3 2020Q3 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings San Antonio New Home Closings Source: Zonda Key Trends Starts: +29% YOY / +1% QOQ Closings: -5% YOY / -4% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 551 Homes 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –3Q24 * Based on additional research by Zonda Education ** Totals DO NOT include age-restricted communities Rank District Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,637 3,710 1,999 6,305 21,310 2 COMAL ISD 2,442 2,704 1,776 4,918 24,373 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,202 2,382 1,217 4,596 31,031 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,222 2,055 1,254 4,560 24,573 5 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,333 1,203 739 2,317 7,002 6 JUDSON ISD 679 941 308 508 969 7 SCHERTZ CIBOLO ISD*770 831 442 1,939 6,169 8 NAVARRO ISD 834 810 482 1,253 6,877 9 BOERNE ISD 784 768 555 1,264 9,651 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 706 731 298 964 16,713 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 610 618 388 767 6,366 12 NORTH EAST ISD 347 342 220 899 5,316 13 SEGUIN ISD 318 321 250 588 5,519 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 247 222 162 160 720 15 MARION ISD 194 166 111 264 4,352 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 127 139 54 205 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 70 100 138 327 688 18 LYTLE ISD 88 73 50 334 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 49 64 25 83 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 4 39 23 16 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings by Quarter Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 612 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 684 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 85 19 110 27 29 52 275 238 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 4 0 1 0 1 3 41 242 ROSE GARDEN 205 57 226 38 86 126 680 2,722 SCHERTZ 0 0 23 2 0 1 0 60 SIPPEL 288 63 227 64 89 151 637 1,556 WATTS 53 7 93 26 14 28 23 580 WIEDERSTEIN 135 17 151 43 28 81 283 771 Grand Total 770 163 831 200 247 442 1,939 6,169 •The district has 24 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions •265 lots were delivered in the 3rd quarter 9 District Housing Overview Residential Activity 10 Grace Valley •868 total lots •574 future lots •159 vacant developed lots •31 homes under construction •97 occupied homes •Started 115 homes in last 12 months, started 28 homes in 3Q24 •Streets being paved for 162 lots in Phase 2 •Lennar •$237K+ •Current Student Yield = .20 Nov 2024 Nov 2024Residential Activity 11 Carmel Ranch •127 total lots •120 vacant developed lots •7 homes under construction •All lots delivered for homebuilding 3Q24 •Anticipate first homes Spring 2025 •Meritage Homes •$402K+ Saddlebrook Ranch •635 total lots •467 future lots •164 vacant developed lots •4 homes under construction •First homes started 3Q24 •Groundwork underway on 132 lots in Phase 4 & 6 •Ashton Woods Homes •$360K+ Residential Activity 12 Clearwater Creek •1,156 total future lots •Initial groundwork underway on 104 lots in Phase 1 •Lennar Nov 2024 13 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family Market-September 2024 14 District Multifamily Overview •There are more than 600 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes •There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district Residential Activity 15 Schertz Station •318 single-family rental homes under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 Residential Activity 16 Aviator 1518 •300 apartment units under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 •There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district •The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 17 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 18 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 19 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12)827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13)862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14)937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15)985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16)989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17)995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18)1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19)982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20)1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21)951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22)935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23)819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24)788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25)739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26)699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27)763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28)750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29)776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD KG Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 20 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 -107 -0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 -221 -1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 -209 -1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 -172 -1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 -197 -1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 -63 -0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 -89 -0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 -165 -1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 -41 -0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 -5 0.0% 21 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change -4.17%-3.35%-1.80%-1.18%0.72%1.06%2.22%1.44%1.75%1.72%1.91% Elementary Absolute Change -213 -164 -85 -55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%-0.40%-3.73%-2.61%-4.69%-5.02%-3.97%2.48%2.85%0.47%2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 -9 -83 -56 -98 -100 -75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change -4.01%-2.01%4.31%-0.96%-3.96%-2.68%-4.73%-4.73%-4.02%2.43%2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change -98 -47 99 -23 -94 -61 -105 -100 -81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92%2.07%-2.72%-1.38%-0.24%-1.59%0.25%-1.95%-4.30%-3.68%-4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 -152 -75 -13 -85 13 -103 -222 -182 -203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change -1.32%-0.72%-1.49%-1.43%-1.19%-1.38%-0.45%-0.64%-1.19%-0.30%-0.04% District Absolute Change -200 -107 -221 -209 -172 -197 -63 -89 -165 -41 -5 22 Key Takeaways If the current trend continues, Schertz-Cibolo- Universal City ISD could experience more than 900 new home closings by the end of 2024 The district has more than 440 homes currently in inventory with more than 1,900 additional lots available to build on Groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD is forecasted to enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 5 B   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Samuel Haas, Senior Planner SUBJECT:PLZC20240315 - Hold a public hearing and make a recommendation on a request to rezone approximately 173 acres of land from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and Single-Family Residential District (R-6), known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310012, 309425, 309427, generally located 1,000 feet to the west of Cibolo Creek on Lower Seguin Road, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas BACKGROUND Per the applicant's letter of intent, the applicant is proposing to rezone three separate tracts. The first is an approximately 95-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-1), the second is an approximately 51-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2), and the final tract is an approximately 27-acre tract from Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-6). The purpose of this rezone is to develop a single family subdivision with a mixture of housing types and lot sizes.  The property is not platted and is currently undeveloped. On May 23, 2025, eight (8) public hearing notices were mailed to the surrounding properties within a 200-foot notification boundary of the subject property. At the time of the staff report, one (1) response in favor, zero (0) responses neutral, and zero (0) responses in opposition were received. A public hearing notice will be published prior to the City Council Meeting.  Additionally, one (1) sign was placed on the subject property.  Subject Property:   Zoning Land Use Existing Agricultural District (AD) and Single-Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A)Undeveloped / Rural Residence Proposed Single-Family Residential District (R-1, R-2, & R-6)Single-Family Subdivision Adjacent Properties:    Zoning Land Use North Agricultural District (AD)Undeveloped South Right-of-Way Lower Seguin Road  East N/A - City Limits - Waterway,  Agricultural District (AD), and Single Family Residential / Agricultural District (R-A) Cibolo Creek & Rural Residence West Planned Development District (PDD)Single-Family Subdivision (Saddlebrook Ranch) GOAL Per the applicant's letter of intent, the applicant is proposing to rezone approximately 173 acres to develop a single-family subdivision with a mixture of housing types and lot sizes.     Table 21.5.7.A Dimensional Requirements Residential Zoning Districts Minimum Lot Size and Dimensions Minimum Yard Setbacks Miscellaneous Lot Requirements Code District Area SqFt Width Ft Depth Ft Front Ft Side Ft Rear Ft Minimum Off-Street Parking Spaces Max Height Max Impervious Coverage Existing AD Agricultural 217,800 100 100 25 25 25 2 35 30% Existing R-A Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural 21,780 N/A N/A 25 25 25 2 35 50% Proposed R-1 Single-Family Residential 9,600 80 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% Proposed R-2 Single-Family Residential 8,400 70 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% Proposed R-6 Single-Family Residential 7,200 60 120 25 10 20 2 35 50% COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION 1. Whether the proposed zoning change implements the policies of the adopted Comprehensive Land Plan, or any other applicable adopted plans The Comprehensive Plan designates this area as Complete Neighborhood. The Complete Neighborhood Land Use Designation is intended for a mix of residential lot sizes with neighborhood commercial to create a complete neighborhood. The proposed zone change to multiple Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) implements the policies of the Comprehensive Land Use Plan by providing a different lot sizes and a mix of residential properties. Specifically, the proposed rezone would create approximately 94.86 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-1), approximately 51.11 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-2), and approximately 26.78 acres of Single Family Residential District (R-6).  2. Whether the proposed zoning change promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City. As part of promoting health, safety, and general welfare, zone change requests should align with the Unified Development Code (UDC) and city policy. Among these policies is the explicit purpose to "minimize the conflicts among the uses of land and buildings". There are several single-family subdivisions either in development or constructed along the Lower Seguin Road corridor, including:  Rhine Valley - 447 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 45 feet by 120 feet to 60 feet by 120 feet Carmel Ranch - 131 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 55 feet by 125 feet to 70 feet by 120 feet Saddlebrook Ranch - 633 lots, Planned Development District zoning, Lot sizes range from 50 feet by 100 feet to 70 feet by 118 feet Monterey Meadows - Ord. 24-S-148 - Approx. 174 lots, R-2 and R-6 zoning districts  The proposed rezoning is consistent with and similar to existing and currently in development residential subdivisions in the area.  Furthermore, one of the UDC's goals is to "lessen congestion in the streets and provide convenient, safe and efficient circulation for vehicular and pedestrian traffic". As part of this proposed zoning, the applicant submitted a preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) detailing the impact the proposed development will have on the transportation system in the immediate area. The City of Schertz Engineering Department reviewed this preliminary TIA and provided the following:  A preliminary traffic analysis has been done to evaluate the potential impact the adjacent streets by the proposed zone change.  The existing zoning allows for some residential development which would generate a maximum number of peak hour vehicle trips if the property were developed to the maximum density allowed.  A comparison was done comparing this maximum peak hour trip to the peak hour trips the property would generate based on the requested zoning.  The difference between these two peak values is significant.  If the proposed zoning is approved, the site could generate approximately 311 more peak hour vehicle trips.  This increase in the peak hour trips would require a full Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) by the developer as the proposed project progresses through the City’s development process.  For this zone change application, the developer did a preliminary TIA to analyze the effects of this additional traffic to the adjacent streets.  This preliminary TIA shows that certain improvements to Lower Seguin Road will need to be provided to mitigate these additional peak hour vehicle trips.  Such improvements include: a right turn/deceleration lane and left turn lane at the entrance to the proposed development.  Further analysis will be required via a Final TIA for the development as it progresses through the development process, should the zone change request be approved.  The developer will be required to construct all mitigation measure identified in the Final TIA to mitigate the effects of the additional traffic being generated. In additional to any improvements identified in the TIA, the developer will also be responsible for some widening of Lower Seguin Road along the development’s frontage.  This widening, along with the widening done by the Saddlebrook development to the west and the widening that the Monterey Meadows proposed development is required to do on the south side of Lower Seguin Road across from this proposed development, will also add some additional traffic volume capacity to Lower Seguin Road in the vicinity of this proposed development. The Monterey Meadows development is further ahead of this development in the development process and is expected to be constructed slightly in advance of, or at the same time, as this development.  The Preliminary TIA analysis did not rely on any of these improvements in its analysis.  Instead it assumed a “worst case scenario” and analyzed the effects of the additional traffic with Lower Seguin Road remained in its current width.  The required street widening by the proposed developments will increase the positive effect of the mitigation improvements identified in the Preliminary TIA for this development. In summary, the proposed zone change will increase traffic on the City’s transportation system, but that traffic increase can be successfully mitigated by street improvements the developer will be required to construct. 3. Whether the uses permitted by the proposed change will be consistent and appropriate with existing uses in the immediate area The immediate area consists of undeveloped land, rural residences, and several single-family subdivisions currently being developed. The uses permitted in Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) are as follows:  UDC Section 21.5.8 Permitted Uses Single-Family Residential Districts (R-1, R-2, and R-6) Permitted by Right Permitted with SUP Accessory Building, Residential Family or Group Home Gated Community Golf Course and/or Country Club Municipal Uses Operated by the City of Schertz One-Family Dwelling Detached Park/Playground/Similar Public Site School, Public or Private Bed and Breakfast Inn Church, Temple, Synagogue, Mosque, or Other Place of Worship In-Home Day Care New and Unlisted Uses The uses allowed by right and by Specific Use Permit are consistent with the current immediate area and consistent with the trajectory of the Lower Seguin Corridor.  4. Whether other factors are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment All UDC requirements have been met for the proposed zone change. City of Schertz Fire, EMS, and Police Departments have been notified of the zone change and have provided no objections to the request. SCUC ISD has also been notified of the zone change request. The scheduled public hearing provides the opportunity to introduce additional considerations. RECOMMENDATION Due to the conformance with the Comprehensive Plan, and the compatibility and consistency of potential land uses staff is recommending approval of PLZC20240315. Attachments Aerial Exhibit  Public Hearing Notice Map  Public Hearing Responses  Zoning Exhibit  SCUC ISD 10- Year Forecasting  SCUC ISD Demographic Report  :PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 PLZC20240315 T e x a s V l y R o t h a u D r Belfort Pt Erstein Vly Cibolo C r e e k R a f B u r n e tt e T e x a s V l y L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d Mu l h o u s e D r A l s a t i a n W a y S a r r e b o u r g S t A r ch es Vly C ib olo C re e k C i b o l o C r e e k Ci b o l o C r e e k L o w e r S e g u i n R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d Lo w e r S e g u i n R d Lo w e r S e g u i n R d W e i r R d L o w e r S e g u i n R d U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U [Ú !P!P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P !P 60591 WOOD D A V I D & HALIM U Y A K W E T A L 60567 LAUBA C H G I L B E R T & FRAN C E S 60535 YOUNG DAVID A & LENORE M 69602 NOLTE R R O B E R T SCOTT & A L L I S O N G 60581 NOLTE R R O B E R T SCOTT & A L L I S O N G 309429 FERNANDEZ ROSENDO ZAMBRANO 309421 YOUNG DAVID A & LENORE M 309419 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 10008 1 5 4 310011 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 310022 FRIESENHAHN MILTON & BILLIE, BASHA ELIZABETH ANN, ZWIEKE 1367371 ASHTON SAN ANTONIO RESIDENTIAL LLC 10008 1 4 6 10008 1 4 5 10008 1 4 2 10008 1 4 0 100081 3 7 10008 1 3 2 100081 2 9 100081 2 7 10008 1 5 5 A S H T O N S A N A N T O N I O R E S I D E N T I A L L L C 8 " W L 1 6 "W L 2 " W L 8" W L 1 8 " W L 8"WL 4 " W L 8" WL 8" WL 30" W L 8 " W L 6 " W L 12" W L 8 " W L 8" W L 8" WL 8" W L 18"WL 8" WL 4"WL 8"WL 8" W L 16 " W L 2" WL 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6"HDP E 6"HD P E 6"HD P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 6 " H D P E 8"PVC SDR 26 D-2241 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 26 8"P V C SD R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 26 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 D - 2 2 4 1 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 8" P V C SD R 2 6 8 " P V C SD R 2 6 8 " P V C S D R 2 6 1 0 " P V C S D R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 2 6 8"PVC S D R 2 6 8"PVC SDR 2 6 S C H A E F E R R D A L S A T I A N W A Y S O R R E L R I V E RMULHOUSEDR L O W E R S E G U I N R D ROTHAU DR D E W R I D G E W A Y WE I R R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L H O M B O U R G R D BARR WAY AR CHES VALLEY OLD CHUT E RD S A R R E B O U R G S T BUSSANGRD PIN E RIV E R D R M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N SPUR H O L L O W PALO M I N O SPUR R E D A P P L E R D PRAI R I E V A L L E Y S U N N Y V E R A N D A R D LOWE R P E A C H W A Y HILL P L A I N S DR ST LO U I S WAY GUNS B A C H WAY P E P P E R C O R N P L MOLSHEIM R D WIND I N G PEA R L N B A Y M A R E L N R E D B U D C A N Y O N B E LFORT PT B L U E B O N N E T P T LOWE R V A L L E Y L N G A L I N E E R G L E N B A R T E N H E I M D R T E X A S V A L L E Y P V T R D A T 1 4 4 2 H A E C K E R VI L L E R D RAF B U R N E T T E G u a d a l u p e C o u n t y B e x a r C o u n t y Sources: Esri, TomTom, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, © OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community, Maxar 0 600 1,200 1,800300Feet Highways Major Roads Minor Roads Freeway Principal Arterial Planned Principal Arterial Secondary Arterial Planned Secondary Arterial Secondary Rural Arterial Planned Secondary Rural Arterial Residential Collector Planned Residential Collector Planned Commercial Collector B Commercial Collector A Planned Commercial Collector A 1" 2" 3" 4" 6" 8" 10" 12" 16" 18" 20" 24" 30" 36" Unknown Schertz Gravity Schertz Pressure Neighboring Gravity Private Pressure U Hydrant !P Manholes [Ú CCMA Lift Station [Ú Private Lift Station [Ú Schertz Lift Station 3Q CCMA Treatment Plant 3Q Schertz Treatment Plant County Boundaries Schertz Municipal Boundary ETJ Last update: January 23rd, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" withoutany express or implied warranty of any kind including but not limited to the impliedwarranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The Cityof Schertz be liable for any special, indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials. Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the information herein. The Cityof Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein atany time.* City of Schertz PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 : CONC O R D I A L N (605 9 1 ) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (6056 7 ) HAECKERVILLE RD (60535) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (696 0 2 ) HAEC K E R V I L L E R D (605 8 1 ) 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 0 9 4 2 9 ) 1282 6 RAF B U R N E T T E (309 4 2 1 ) 1257 2 RAF B U R N E T T E (309 4 1 9 ) 1014 8 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 3 2 ) 1014 4 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 5 5 ) 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D ( 3 1 0 0 1 1 ) 1284 0 LOWE R S E G U I N R D (310 0 2 2 ) LOW E R S E G U I N R D (136 7 3 7 1 ) 1017 2 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 5 4 ) 1016 8 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 6 ) 1016 4 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 5 ) 1016 0 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 2 ) 1015 6 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 4 0 ) 1015 2 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 3 7 ) 1013 6 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 7 ) 1014 0 K E T T L E C O R N T R L ( 1 0 0 0 8 1 2 9 ) LUNEVILL E LN S C H A E F E R R D P A S E O P O S T P L A L S A T I A N W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E H O M B O U R G R D ROTHAU DR S O R R E L R I V E R M E S Q U I T E T R E E L N BE L F O R T P T BU S S A N G R D A R C H E S V A L L E Y SPUR HOLL O W L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D RED APPLE R D HILL PLAIN S D R PI N E R I V E R D R GUNS B A C H WAY LOWE R PEACH W A Y MOLSHEIM RD LOWE R V A L L E Y L N PRAI R I E V A L L E Y B L U E B O N N E T P T MULHO U S E D R G A L I N E E R G L E N P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D B A R T E N H E I M D R R E D B U D C A N Y O N WE I R R D T E X A S V A L L E Y PVT R D A T 1 4 4 2 HAECK E R V I L L E R D RAF B U R N E T T E 0 900 1,800 2,700450Feet Project Boundary City Limits Schertz ETJ Boundary 200' Buffer PRE PRE PDD R-2 AD R-6 R-1 R-6 R-2 D E W R I D G E W A Y WEIR R D B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L LOWE R S E G U I N R D K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R WE I R R D PRAI R I E VALL E Y C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST SPUR HOLL O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY Q U A I L C R E S T RED A P P L E R D S A R R E B O U R G S T G A L I N E E R G L E N PI N E RI V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEACH WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N BAY MARE L N DENIM STAK E D R CA R M E L VI E W HORSE B A C K PL B L U E B O N N E T P T WINDI N G BUTTE MULH O U S E D R LAGUN A CREST ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N RAF B U R N E T T E PRE PRE AD AD PDD R-A R-2 AD R-6 B L U E B O N N E T P T D E W R I D G E W A Y B U L L B R A N C H A V E P A S E O P O S T P L K E T T L E C O R N T R L S O R R E L R I V E R WEIR R D C A R M E L R A N C H HORIZ O N CREST LOWE R S E G U I N R D SPUR HOLL O W P V T R D A T 1 2 8 2 0 L O W E R S E G U I N R D P V T R D A T 1 3 0 1 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D MIRECOURT WAY RED A P P L E R D Q U A I L C R E S T S A R R E B O U R G S T PI N E RI V E R D R HILL PLAIN S D R P E P P E R C O R N P L LOWE R PEACH WAY WIND I N G PEAR L N PRAI R I E V A L L E Y BAY MARE L N DENIM STAK E D R CA R M E L VI E W HORSE B A C K PL WINDI N G BUTTE MULH O U S E D R LAGUN A CREST G A L I N E E R G L E N ST LO U I S WAY P V T R D A T 1 3 1 9 1 L O W E R S E G U I N R D R E D B U D C A N Y O N WE I R R D RAF B U R N E T T E Last update: January 23rd, 2025 City of Schertz, GIS Specialist: Alexa Venezia, avenezia@schertz.com (210) 619-1174 *The City of Schertz provides this Geographic Information System product "as is" without any express or implied warranty of any kind including but notlimited to the implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. In no event shall The City of Schertz be liable for any special,indirect, or consequential damages or any damages whatsoever arising out of or in connection with the use of or performance of these materials.Information published in this product could include technical inaccuracies or typographical errors. Periodical changes may be added to the informationherein. The City of Schertz may make improvements and/or changes in the product(s) described herein at any time.* BEXAR COUNTY PARCEL IDs: 310012, 309425, 309427 CURRENT : Classification (PRE) Pre-Development (PDD) Planned Development (PUB) Public Use (R-A) Single-family Residential/Agricultural (R-1) Single-Family Residential (R-2) Single-Family Residential (R-3) Two-Family Residential (R-4) Apartment/Multi-Family Residential (R-5) Middle Density District (R-6) Single-family Residential (R-7) Single-family Residential (AD) Agricultural District (GH) Garden Home/Single-Family Residential (Zero Lot Line) (TH) Townhome (MHS) Manufactured Home Subdivision (MHP) Manufactured Home Parks (GB) General Business (GB-2) General Business II (NS) Neighborhood Services (OP) Office and Professional (MSMU) Main Street Mixed Use (MSMU-ND) Main Street Mixed Use New Development (M-1) Manufacturing (Light) (M-2) Manufacturing (Heavy) (DVL) Development Agreement (Delayed Annexation) 0 800 1,600 2,400400Feet PROPOSED ZONING CHANGE PROPOSED FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • • 13,540 14,056 14,586 15,081 15,465 15,615 15,768 15,972 15,673 15,890 15,521 15,146 14,864 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT ENROLLMENT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT 1.0% growth per year (153 students per year) 1.3% loss per year (-195 students per year) 3.4% growth per year (481 students per year) HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT BY CAMPUS LEVEL 5,261 5,446 5,512 5,716 5,783 5,811 5,899 5,547 5,596 5,406 5,110 4,895 2,125 2,211 2,326 2,253 2,252 2,344 2,445 2,375 2,345 2,200 2,176 2,226 2,210 2,211 2,341 2,421 2,453 2,403 2,363 2,467 2,605 2,536 2,442 2,324 4,460 4,718 4,902 5,075 5,127 5,210 5,265 5,284 5,344 5,379 5,418 5,419 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024-P # O F S T U D E N T S CAMPUS LEVEL ENROLLMENT Elementary Intermediate Junior High High School ENROLLMENT HISTORY BY LEVEL –OCTOBER • • • • • • • STUDENT TRANSFERS PEIMS YEAR TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT DIFFERENCE 2012 216 681 -465 2013 212 704 -492 2014 244 647 -403 2015 302 702 -400 2016 297 907 -610 2017 290 1061 -771 2018 304 1079 -775 2019 296 1283 -987 2020 300 1591 -1291 2021 317 1981 -1664 2022 308 2695 -2387 2023 Data available in March First Year of Founders Charter School First Year of School of Science and Technology First Year of Legacy Traditional School STUDENT TRANSFERS IN VS. OUT 216 212 244 302 297 290 304 296 300 317 308 681 704 647 702 907 1,061 1,079 1,283 1,591 1,981 2,695 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 # O F S T U D E N T S STUDENT TRANSFERS IN vs OUT TRANSFER IN TRANSFER OUT School of Science and Technology Pre-K –8th Grade Legacy Traditional Pre-K –8th Grade Founders Academy K –12th Grade MAIN DESTINATIONS FOR TRANSFERS OUT 444 472 551 529 504 272 328 356 365 414 34 43 119 159 192 16 24 71 285 367 52 106 229 0 463 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 # O F S T U D E N T S TRANSFER DESTINATIONS Randolph ISD Founders Academy Great Hearts School of Science and Technology Judson ISD Legacy Traditional SO, HOW MANY STUDENTS WILL WE HAVE IN THE FUTURE? 14,056 15,081 15,615 15,972 15,890 15,146 14,661 14,217 14,007 14,036 14,162 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000 15,000 16,000 17,000 18,000 19,000 20,000 # O F S T U D E N T S DISTRICT HISTORICAL ENROLLMENT AND PROJECTIONS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o o PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.42% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% PEIMS YEAR PROJECTED ENROLLMENT GROWTH (DECLINE) PERCENTAGE CHANGE 2023 15,146 -375 -2.44% 2024-P 14,864 -282 -1.86% 2025-P 14,661 -203 -1.37% 2026-P 14,451 -210 -1.43% 2027-P 14,217 -234 -1. 62% 2028-P 14,073 -144 -1.01% 2029-P 14,007 -66 -0.47% 2030-P 14,017 10 0.07% 2031-P 14,036 19 0.14% 2032-P 14,059 22 0.16% 2033-P 14,162 103 0.73% ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS o o o WHY HAS IT BECOME SO HARD TO PROJECT ENROLLMENT? o o o o o o FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • •CAMPUS CAPACITY UNDERSTANDING CAMPUS CAPACITY o o o o o o o o o PLANNING USING OUR MAXIMUM CAPACITY o CAPACITY RELIEF TOOLS o o o o o o o o o ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 891 1,200 761 657 611 587 589 594 594 608 617 620 627 637 % Max Capacity 63%55%51%49%49%49%49%51%51%52%52%53% GREEN VALLEY EL 673 924 586 533 497 482 469 497 506 524 535 537 535 529 % Max Capacity 63%58%54%52%51%54%55%57%58%58%58%57% NORMA PASCHAL EL 673 924 603 625 591 582 564 544 546 559 569 574 580 585 % Max Capacity 65%68%64%63%61%59%59%60%62%62%63%63% ROSE GARDEN EL 891 1,200 899 896 882 878 891 923 957 999 1,046 1,075 1,104 1,131 % Max Capacity 75%75%74%73%74%77%80%83%87%90%92%94% SCHERTZ EL 675 1,102 671 668 628 605 601 576 581 588 591 586 582 582 % Max Capacity 61%61%57%55%55%52%53%53%54%53%53%53% SIPPEL EL 675 1,058 742 672 679 690 721 756 782 827 867 904 961 1,030 % Max Capacity 70%64%64%65%68%71%74%78%82%85%91%97% WATTS EL 673 924 593 513 469 440 428 423 428 446 457 463 476 490 % Max Capacity 64%56%51%48%46%46%46%48%49%50%52%53% WIEDERSTEIN EL 675 1,058 551 546 538 544 527 517 529 549 568 574 587 602 % Max Capacity 52%52%51%51%50%49%50%52%54%54%55%57% ELEMENTARY TOTALS 5,826 8,390 5,406 5,110 4,895 4,808 4,790 4,830 4,922 5,099 5,250 5,335 5,453 5,587 % Max Capacity 64%61%58%57%57%58%59%61%63%64%65%67% Elementary Percent Change -3.40%-5.48%-4.21%-1.78%-0.37%0.83%1.91%3.59%2.96%1.63%2.20%2.46% Elementary Absolute Change -190 -296 -215 -87 -18 40 92 177 151 85 117 134 ELEMENTARY CAPACITIES 90% 92%94% 91% 97% 67% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CIBOLO VALLEY EL GREEN VALLEY EL NORMA PASCHAL EL ROSE GARDEN EL SCHERTZ EL SIPPEL EL WATTS EL WIEDERSTEIN EL ELEMENTARY TOTALS INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 JORDAN INT 810 1,000 716 769 796 763 777 742 676 646 641 695 734 739 % Max Capacity 72%77%80%76%78%74%68%65%64%70%73%74% SCHLATHER INT 810 1,200 750 682 700 689 640 573 563 594 597 651 682 677 % Max Capacity 63%57%58%57%53%48%47%50%50%54%57%56% WILDER INT 810 1,250 734 725 730 743 748 739 683 627 616 654 681 685 % Max Capacity 59%58%58%59%60%59%55%50%49%52%54%55% INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 3,450 2,201 2,176 2,226 2,195 2,165 2,054 1,922 1,867 1,854 2,000 2,097 2,101 % Max Capacity 64%63%65%64%63%60%56%54%54%58%61%61% Intermediate Percent Change -6.13%-1.09%2.30%-1.39%-1.37%-5.13%-6.43%-2.86%-0.70%7.87%4.85%0.19% Intermediate Absolute Change -144 -24 50 -31 -30 -111 -132 -55 -13 146 97 4 INTERMEDIATE CAPACITIES 74% 61% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY JORDAN INT SCHLATHER INT WILDER INT INTERMEDIATE TOTALS JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 DOBIE JH 1,300 1,540 1,348 1,316 1,229 1,194 1,228 1,196 1,152 1,058 1,009 1,025 1,025 1,109 % Max Capacity 88%85%80%78%80%78%75%69%66%67%67%72% CORBETT JH 1,080 1,500 1,188 1,126 1,095 1,096 1,103 1,111 1,114 1,083 1,001 936 924 989 % Max Capacity 79%75%73%73%74%74%74%72%67%62%62%66% JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 3,040 2,537 2,442 2,324 2,290 2,331 2,307 2,266 2,141 2,010 1,961 1,949 2,098 % Max Capacity 83%80%76%75%77%76%75%70%66%65%64%69% Junior High School Percent Change -2.62%-3.71%-4.83%-1.46%1.79%-1.03%-1.78%-5.52%-6.12%-2.44%-0.61%7.64% Junior High School Absolute Change -68 -94 -118 -34 41 -24 -41 -125 -131 -49 -12 149 JUNIOR HIGH CAPACITIES 72% 66% 69% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY DOBIE JH CORBETT JH JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity Previous Year Current PEIMS ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 CLEMENS HS 2,700 3,300 2,544 2,563 2,576 2,550 2,469 2,419 2,397 2,400 2,418 2,383 2,292 2,183 % Max Capacity 77%78%78%77%75%73%73%73%73%72%69%66% STEELE HS 2,160 3,200 2,716 2,700 2,688 2,663 2,541 2,452 2,411 2,345 2,330 2,202 2,113 2,038 % Max Capacity 85%84%84%83%79%77%75%73%73%69%66%64% HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 6,650 5,381 5,418 5,419 5,368 5,165 5,026 4,963 4,900 4,903 4,740 4,560 4,376 % Max Capacity 81%81%81%81%78%76%75%74%74%71%69%66% High School Percent Change 0.69%0.71%0.02%-0.94%-3.78%-2.69%-1.25%-1.27%0.06%-3.32%-3.80%-4.04% High School Absolute Change 37 38 1 -52 -204 -137 -64 -63 3 -163 -180 -183 HIGH SCHOOL CAPACITIES 66% 64% 66% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 110% 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 % of MAXIMUM CAMPUS CAPACITY CLEMENS HS STEELE HS HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS FORECASTING CONSIDERATIONS • • • • • •BONDING CAPACITY PROJECTING BONDING CAPACITY -SCUC o PROJECTING TAX REVENUE o ASSUMES NO REFINANCING FOR BOND SAVINGS o DEFEASING PRINCIPAL o MODEST PROPERTY VALUE GROWTH o 4.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2024-2028 o 2.0% ANNUAL INCREASE FOR 2029-2033 o AS DEBT IS RESTRUCTURED AND PROPERTY VALUES INCREASE, WE BEGIN TO HAVE SOME BONDING CAPACITY o CAPACITY FOR ADDITIONAL DEBT IS LOWER AT FIRST, MORE IN LATER YEARS o FORECASTING USING THREE OPTIONS FOR I&S TAX RATE o $0.47 PER $100 OF VALUATION (CURRENT), $0.48 PER $100 VALUATION, AND $0.49 PER $100 VALUATION PROJECTED AVAILABLE BOND DOLLARS $215 $246 $278 $312 $347 $362 $380 $399 $419 $438 $284 $316 $351 $388 $426 $442 $463 $483 $505 $526 $- $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 $350 $400 $450 $500 $550 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BO N D C A P A C I T Y I N M I L L I O N S SCUC Bond Capacity by Year & Rate Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC o o o o o o o o o o o PROJECTING FACILITY COSTS -SCUC YEAR High School Junior High Elementary/ Intermediate 2024 $ 235,000,000 $ 113,000,000 $ 72,000,000 2025-P $ 242,050,000 $ 116,390,000 $ 74,160,000 2026-P $ 246,891,000 $ 118,717,800 $ 75,643,200 2027-P $ 251,828,820 $ 121,092,156 $ 77,156,064 2028-P $ 256,865,396 $ 123,513,999 $ 78,699,185 2029-P $ 262,002,704 $ 125,984,279 $ 80,273,169 2030-P $ 267,242,758 $ 128,503,965 $ 81,878,632 2031-P $ 272,587,614 $ 131,074,044 $ 83,516,205 2032-P $ 278,039,366 $ 133,695,525 $ 85,186,529 2033-P $ 283,600,153 $ 136,369,435 $ 86,890,260 2034-P $ 289,272,156 $ 139,096,824 $ 88,628,065 PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ PROJECTED BOND CAPACITIES VS. CONSTRUCTION COSTS $0 $100,000,000 $200,000,000 $300,000,000 $400,000,000 $500,000,000 $600,000,000 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 BONDING CAPACITY VS CONSTRUCTION COSTS JUNIOR HIGH Bond Capacity 47¢Bond Capacity 48¢Bond Capacity 49¢ Estimated $41 M in HVAC needs over the next 10 years Estimated $9 M in Ancillary Systems needs over the next 10 years Estimated $40 M in Building and Site needs over the next 10 years TAKE AWAYS…. o o o o o o o o o QUESTIONS/COMMENTS 3Q24 Demographic Report 2 Annual Enrollment Change *Yellow Box = largest grade per year Green Box = second largest grade per year Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2024/25 384 747 849 866 1,006 1,043 1,108 1,118 1,126 1,198 1,413 1,427 1,354 1,225 14,864 Difference 60 -10 -35 29 -17 -25 13 -2 -14 34 56 -24 40 -23 82 18.5%-1.1%-3.4%2.8%-1.6%-2.2%1.1%-0.2%-1.1%2.8%4.3%-1.7%3.1%-1.8%0.5% 3-year avg.0.992 0.924 1.028 1.025 1.026 1.023 0.984 1.023 1.020 1.029 1.127 0.975 0.928 0.995 1.005 1.004 1.025 1.006 Cohorts PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Elem Int Mid High 2021/22 1.400 0.983 1.048 1.000 1.033 1.036 0.990 1.068 1.045 1.056 1.171 1.042 0.936 0.969 1.020 1.029 1.050 1.029 2022/23 0.958 0.876 1.029 1.001 1.057 1.037 0.956 1.008 1.007 1.015 1.121 0.960 0.926 0.983 1.000 0.982 1.011 0.998 2023/24 0.986 0.962 1.023 1.005 0.999 1.012 0.969 1.028 1.040 1.028 1.099 0.987 0.903 1.031 1.000 0.998 1.034 1.005 2024/25 1.033 0.935 1.033 1.068 1.023 1.021 1.028 1.034 1.014 1.046 1.162 0.978 0.955 0.971 1.016 1.031 1.030 1.017 3.2 3.4 3.5 3.7 3.6 3.7 3.7 3.9 4.1 3.9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Guadalupe Co. Comal Co. San Antonio MSA Texas US Unemployment Rate, Year Over Year Oct-24 Oct-23 3 Local Economic Conditions 3 12.6 3.9 3.5 4.1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 Se p - 1 9 No v - 1 9 Ja n - 2 0 Ma r - 2 0 Ma y - 2 0 Ju l - 2 0 Se p - 2 0 No v - 2 0 Ja n - 2 1 Ma r - 2 1 Ma y - 2 1 Ju l - 2 1 Se p - 2 1 No v - 2 1 Ja n - 2 2 Ma r - 2 2 Ma y - 2 2 Ju l - 2 2 Se p - 2 2 No v - 2 2 Ja n - 2 3 Ma r - 2 3 Ma y - 2 3 Ju l - 2 3 Se p - 2 3 No v - 2 3 Ja n - 2 4 Ma r - 2 4 Ma y - 2 4 Ju l - 2 4 Se p - 2 4 Unemployment Rate, Sept 2019 –Oct 2024 San Antonio MSA Texas 4 Housing Activity by MSA © 2022 Zonda 17,441 17,992 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 2014Q3 2015Q3 2016Q3 2017Q3 2018Q3 2019Q3 2020Q3 2021Q3 2022Q3 2023Q3 2024Q3 Annual Housing Starts vs. Annual Closings Annual Housing Starts Annual Closings San Antonio New Home Closings Source: Zonda Key Trends Starts: +29% YOY / +1% QOQ Closings: -5% YOY / -4% QOQ Closings Exceed Starts by 551 Homes 6 San Antonio New Home Ranking Report ISD Ranked by Annual Closings –3Q24 * Based on additional research by Zonda Education ** Totals DO NOT include age-restricted communities Rank District Annual Starts Annual Closings Inventory VDL Future 1 NORTHSIDE ISD 3,637 3,710 1,999 6,305 21,310 2 COMAL ISD 2,442 2,704 1,776 4,918 24,373 3 MEDINA VALLEY ISD 2,202 2,382 1,217 4,596 31,031 4 EAST CENTRAL ISD 2,222 2,055 1,254 4,560 24,573 5 SOUTHWEST ISD 1,333 1,203 739 2,317 7,002 6 JUDSON ISD 679 941 308 508 969 7 SCHERTZ CIBOLO ISD*770 831 442 1,939 6,169 8 NAVARRO ISD 834 810 482 1,253 6,877 9 BOERNE ISD 784 768 555 1,264 9,651 10 SOUTHSIDE ISD 706 731 298 964 16,713 11 NEW BRAUNFELS ISD 610 618 388 767 6,366 12 NORTH EAST ISD 347 342 220 899 5,316 13 SEGUIN ISD 318 321 250 588 5,519 14 SOUTH SAN ANTONIO ISD 247 222 162 160 720 15 MARION ISD 194 166 111 264 4,352 16 FLORESVILLE ISD 127 139 54 205 0 17 SAN ANTONIO ISD 70 100 138 327 688 18 LYTLE ISD 88 73 50 334 1,046 19 PLEASANTON ISD 49 64 25 83 0 20 ALAMO HEIGHTS ISD 4 39 23 16 19 0 200 400 600 800 1,000 1,200 1,400 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Annual Starts Annual Closings 7 District New Home Starts and Closings by Quarter Starts 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Closings 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 1Q 175 201 237 294 349 103 189 1Q 133 138 165 190 181 280 235 2Q 180 176 197 300 393 187 260 2Q 185 211 249 258 227 247 249 3Q 177 207 261 265 174 241 163 3Q 185 240 286 268 218 199 200 4Q 185 198 232 319 63 157 4Q 161 179 213 196 334 155 Total 717 782 927 1,178 979 688 612 Total 664 768 913 912 960 881 684 8 District Housing Overview by Elementary Zone Highest activity in the category Second highest activity in the category Third highest activity in the category Elementary Annual Starts Quarter Starts Annual Closings Quarter Closings Under Const.Inventory Vacant Dev. Lots Future CIBOLO VALLEY 85 19 110 27 29 52 275 238 GREEN VALLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PASCHAL 4 0 1 0 1 3 41 242 ROSE GARDEN 205 57 226 38 86 126 680 2,722 SCHERTZ 0 0 23 2 0 1 0 60 SIPPEL 288 63 227 64 89 151 637 1,556 WATTS 53 7 93 26 14 28 23 580 WIEDERSTEIN 135 17 151 43 28 81 283 771 Grand Total 770 163 831 200 247 442 1,939 6,169 •The district has 24 actively building subdivisions •Within SCUCISD there are 6 future subdivisions in various stages of planning •Of these, groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions •265 lots were delivered in the 3rd quarter 9 District Housing Overview Residential Activity 10 Grace Valley •868 total lots •574 future lots •159 vacant developed lots •31 homes under construction •97 occupied homes •Started 115 homes in last 12 months, started 28 homes in 3Q24 •Streets being paved for 162 lots in Phase 2 •Lennar •$237K+ •Current Student Yield = .20 Nov 2024 Nov 2024Residential Activity 11 Carmel Ranch •127 total lots •120 vacant developed lots •7 homes under construction •All lots delivered for homebuilding 3Q24 •Anticipate first homes Spring 2025 •Meritage Homes •$402K+ Saddlebrook Ranch •635 total lots •467 future lots •164 vacant developed lots •4 homes under construction •First homes started 3Q24 •Groundwork underway on 132 lots in Phase 4 & 6 •Ashton Woods Homes •$360K+ Residential Activity 12 Clearwater Creek •1,156 total future lots •Initial groundwork underway on 104 lots in Phase 1 •Lennar Nov 2024 13 Housing Market Trends: Multi-family Market-September 2024 14 District Multifamily Overview •There are more than 600 multifamily units under construction, 318 of which are single family rental homes •There are nearly 1,300 future multifamily units in various stages of planning across the district Residential Activity 15 Schertz Station •318 single-family rental homes under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 Residential Activity 16 Aviator 1518 •300 apartment units under construction •Estimated lease date mid 2025 Nov 2024 •There are 287 students residing in 2,472 multifamily units across the district •The overall district multifamily yield is 0.116 17 District Multifamily Yield 2,065 1,9111,988 1,690 0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 2023/24 2024/25 Newcomers Leavers 18 Newcomers and Leavers +77 +221 19 Birth Rate Analysis Kindergarten Enrollment District Births Ratio 2006 (2011/12)827 568 1.456 2007 (2012/13)862 695 1.240 2008 (2013/14)937 745 1.258 2009 (2014/15)985 758 1.299 2010 (2015/16)989 779 1.270 2011 (2016/17)995 790 1.259 2012 (2017/18)1,009 860 1.173 2013 (2018/19)982 838 1.172 2014 (2019/20)1,048 874 1.199 2015 (2020/21)951 900 1.057 2016 (2021/22)935 978 0.956 2017 (2022/23)819 900 0.910 2018 (2023/24)788 962 0.819 2019 (2024/25)739 913 0.809 2020 (2025/26)699 867 0.806 2021 (2026/27)763 946 0.807 2022 (2027/28)750 934 0.803 2023 (2028/29)776 972 0.798 0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 Schertz-Cibolo-U City ISD KG Enrollment vs. District Births Kindergarten Enrollment District Births 20 Yellow box = largest grade per year Green box = second largest grade per year Ten Year Forecast by Grade Level Year (Oct.)EE/PK K 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th 12th Total Total Growth % Growth 2020/21 325 951 1,019 1,040 1,077 1,135 1,143 1,232 1,248 1,219 1,293 1,394 1,305 1,292 15,673 2021/22 455 935 997 1,019 1,074 1,116 1,124 1,221 1,287 1,318 1,428 1,347 1,305 1,264 15,890 217 1.4% 2022/23 436 819 962 998 1,077 1,114 1,067 1,133 1,230 1,306 1,478 1,371 1,247 1,283 15,521 -369 -2.3% 2023/24 430 788 838 967 997 1,090 1,079 1,097 1,178 1,264 1,435 1,459 1,238 1,286 15,146 -375 -2.4% 2024/25 444 737 814 895 989 1,018 1,121 1,116 1,112 1,232 1,469 1,403 1,394 1,202 14,946 -200 -1.3% 2025/26 452 715 766 853 925 1,022 1,057 1,171 1,147 1,150 1,415 1,438 1,354 1,374 14,839 -107 -0.7% 2026/27 458 780 747 805 886 972 1,051 1,094 1,207 1,189 1,315 1,388 1,374 1,352 14,618 -221 -1.5% 2027/28 461 768 815 789 838 922 998 1,091 1,120 1,253 1,370 1,286 1,335 1,363 14,409 -209 -1.4% 2028/29 463 797 806 858 825 877 953 1,038 1,119 1,160 1,436 1,342 1,237 1,326 14,237 -172 -1.2% 2029/30 463 811 826 836 888 851 903 988 1,057 1,161 1,331 1,406 1,287 1,232 14,040 -197 -1.4% 2030/31 463 833 840 860 865 918 878 938 1,015 1,098 1,335 1,303 1,352 1,279 13,977 -63 -0.4% 2031/32 463 850 867 874 894 900 948 913 961 1,052 1,264 1,307 1,252 1,343 13,888 -89 -0.6% 2032/33 463 862 877 899 906 926 929 985 935 997 1,207 1,237 1,254 1,246 13,723 -165 -1.2% 2033/34 463 885 890 910 931 939 957 966 1,009 970 1,146 1,184 1,185 1,247 13,682 -41 -0.3% 2034/35 463 902 917 924 943 965 971 995 991 1,047 1,115 1,124 1,140 1,180 13,677 -5 0.0% 21 Ten Year Forecast by Campus Yellow box = exceeds Functional capacity Pink box = exceeds Max capacity Fall ENROLLMENT PROJECTIONS Campus Functional Capacity Max Capacity 2024/25 2025/26 2026/27 2027/28 2028/29 2029/30 2030/31 2031/32 2032/33 2033/34 2034/35 CIBOLO VALLEY EL 1,038 1,200 591 535 523 519 510 512 521 526 534 544 554 GREEN VALLEY EL 732 899 503 481 463 469 462 453 451 450 450 448 449 NORMA PASCHAL EL 704 871 574 556 545 521 531 524 528 527 530 531 531 ROSE GARDEN EL 1,031 1,200 861 838 814 813 814 830 856 876 906 936 969 SCHERTZ EL 683 1,017 663 635 618 571 561 561 564 556 553 550 545 SIPPEL EL 704 997 641 625 628 645 647 665 689 707 731 757 783 WATTS EL 739 906 500 486 473 457 473 480 494 505 519 530 546 WIEDERSTEIN EL 704 997 564 577 584 598 628 650 676 701 710 722 737 ELEMENTARY TOTALS 4,897 4,733 4,648 4,593 4,626 4,675 4,779 4,848 4,933 5,018 5,114 Elementary Percent Change -4.17%-3.35%-1.80%-1.18%0.72%1.06%2.22%1.44%1.75%1.72%1.91% Elementary Absolute Change -213 -164 -85 -55 33 49 104 69 85 85 96 JORDAN INT 888 1,126 811 781 754 752 711 675 665 694 728 737 755 SCHLATHER INT 832 1,116 724 740 683 615 607 607 556 569 583 585 599 WILDER INT 855 1,188 702 707 708 722 673 609 595 598 603 601 612 INTERMEDIATE TOTALS 2,237 2,228 2,145 2,089 1,991 1,891 1,816 1,861 1,914 1,923 1,966 Intermediate Percent Change 2.80%-0.40%-3.73%-2.61%-4.69%-5.02%-3.97%2.48%2.85%0.47%2.24% Intermediate Absolute Change 61 -9 -83 -56 -98 -100 -75 45 53 9 43 DOBIE JH 1,285 1,540 1,231 1,184 1,262 1,256 1,180 1,108 1,073 1,052 992 1,023 1,058 CORBETT JH 1,285 1,500 1,113 1,113 1,134 1,117 1,099 1,110 1,040 961 940 956 980 JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 2,344 2,297 2,396 2,373 2,279 2,218 2,113 2,013 1,932 1,979 2,038 Junior High School Percent Change -4.01%-2.01%4.31%-0.96%-3.96%-2.68%-4.73%-4.73%-4.02%2.43%2.98% Junior High School Absolute Change -98 -47 99 -23 -94 -61 -105 -100 -81 47 59 CLEMENS HS 2,733 3,300 2,589 2,618 2,531 2,523 2,523 2,491 2,503 2,492 2,388 2,309 2,206 STEELE HS 2,733 3,200 2,790 2,871 2,806 2,739 2,726 2,673 2,674 2,582 2,464 2,361 2,261 ALSELC 89 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 HIGH SCHOOL TOTALS 5,468 5,581 5,429 5,354 5,341 5,256 5,269 5,166 4,944 4,762 4,559 High School Percent Change 0.92%2.07%-2.72%-1.38%-0.24%-1.59%0.25%-1.95%-4.30%-3.68%-4.26% High School Absolute Change 50 113 -152 -75 -13 -85 13 -103 -222 -182 -203 DISTRICT TOTALS 14,946 14,839 14,618 14,409 14,237 14,040 13,977 13,888 13,723 13,682 13,677 District Percent Change -1.32%-0.72%-1.49%-1.43%-1.19%-1.38%-0.45%-0.64%-1.19%-0.30%-0.04% District Absolute Change -200 -107 -221 -209 -172 -197 -63 -89 -165 -41 -5 22 Key Takeaways If the current trend continues, Schertz-Cibolo- Universal City ISD could experience more than 900 new home closings by the end of 2024 The district has more than 440 homes currently in inventory with more than 1,900 additional lots available to build on Groundwork is underway on approx. 770 lots within 8 subdivisions Schertz-Cibolo-Universal City ISD is forecasted to enroll more than 14,000 students by 2029/30 14,946 14,040 13,677 12,500 13,000 13,500 14,000 14,500 15,000 15,500 16,000 16,500 Enrollment Projections PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 5 C   TO:Planning and Zoning Commission PREPARED BY:Daisy Marquez, Planner SUBJECT:PLUDC20250123- Conduct a public hearing, workshop, and discussion and possible action to make a recommendation on amendments to Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC), to Article 8 Section 21.8.9 - Outdoor Display and Storage.  BACKGROUND Per Unified Development Code (UDC), Section 21.4.7, City Council may, from time to time, on its own motion, or at the request of the City Manager or his/her designee, may change or modify the UDC in order to establish and maintain sound, stable, and desirable development. The proposed UDC amendments, which were initiated by the Planning Division Staff, are meant to simplify the categories of outdoor display and storage by amending the defitinitions and expanding the exceptions.  The proposed UDC amendments include modifications to Article 8, Section 21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage; to create new categories of Outdoor Display and Storage, amend definitions, clarify general requirements, and expand exceptions. Proposed Amendments Staff is proposing modifications to the following UDC Article 8, Section 21.8.9 subsections:  Article UDC Section Current UDC Proposed Amendment Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Temporary Outdoor Storage Zoning Districts Change the classification names to Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage.  Outdoor Display is permitted in NS, MSMU, GB, GB-2, M-1, and M-2. Outdoor Storage is permitted in GB-2, M-1, and M-2, and requires an SUP in PUB Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.1 Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage of goods in individual packaging and not in storage containers which are associated with the primary business on the site may be allowed adjacent to a front principal building wall and may not extend into the public right-of-way. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. Modifying the definition of Outdoor display to include items actively for sale or lease typically seen at home improvement businesses which include:  pallets of mulch; sod; and prefabricated sheds. Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.2 General outdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of outdoor storage not classified as outdoor display including items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Modifying the definition of Outdoor Storage to expand on the types of items that would not fall under Outdoor Display, which include the items from the previous definition in addition to:  unpackaged dirt; landscape materials; and other items sold in bulk associated with wholesale business. Outdoor Storage items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. Article 8 Section 21.8.9.; Specifically 21.8.9.B.4. Exceptions included vehicles for sale, flea markets, and special provisions for vehicles/ food trucks for material delays during the pandemic. Exceptions expanded to include Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, Outdoor Sales, and Sidewalk Sales. Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Specifically 21.8.9.B.3. 3. Outdoor Display and Storage Requirements a. All outdoor display and storage areas must be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property. b. Unless specifically authorized elsewhere in the City's ordinances, all outdoor display and storage areas shall be located outside the public right-of-way. Moved to the top of the UDC Section and placed under General Requirements.  Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; 1. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property, additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require an Amended Site Plan; 2. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and 3. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. 4. Article 8 Section 21.8.9; Section 21.8.9.C.Effective Dates Removal of the effective dates section. Article 7 of the UDC lists the nonconforming uses, lots, and structures regulations. GOAL To amend Part III of the Schertz Code of Ordinance, Unified Development Code (UDC) Article 8- Outdoor Display and Storage. COMMUNITY BENEFIT It is the City’s desire to promote safe, orderly, efficient development and ensure compliance with the City’s vision of future growth. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED ACTION When considering UDC amendments, staff considers the criteria listed in UDC Section 21.4.7.D. The criteria are listed below: 1. The proposed amendment promotes the health, safety, and general welfare of the City; Staff proposes UDC amendments from time to time to proactively better the Unified Development Code that governs development within the City of Schertz. UDC Section 21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Storage has not been reviewed since the pandemic to implement pandemic-specific regulations, and before that, it had not been reviewed since its implementation in 2010.  2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the UDC and the City; The purpose and intent of the UDC is to ensure the safe, orderly, and efficient development and expansion of the City. By being proactive with these proposed UDC amendments, Staff can provide clarification on questions and issues that have arisen over the years with the interpretation of the ordinance. The UDC must be amended to keep up with the changing retail and commercial environments. The Main-Street Mixed-Use (MSMU) zoning district was adopted after the adoption of the Outdoor Display and Storage section, which resulted in exclusion from opportunities that can come from outdoor display in commercial areas.  With the proposed UDC amendments, MSMU zoning is included in the permitted use table for Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage. Additionally, the expansion of the exclusions within Section 21.8.9 further clarifies what falls under Outdoor Display versus Outdoor Storage, which is a frequent question businesses have. Commercial businesses have also indicated a desire to have the ability to include Outdoor Display, which is not allowed with the current UDC language for Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage.  3. The proposed amendment corrects an error, meets the challenge of changing conditions, or is in response to changes in state law; and Section 21.8.9 was last amended in 2022, with Ordinance 22-S-19, in response to the pandemic. The proposed UDC changes meet the needs of the changing commercial environment by adding garden centers and sidewalk sales to the exclusions and providing clarity to the definitions of Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage, which in turn allows for businesses that may not have been allowed before per our UDC. 4. Other factors which are deemed relevant and important in the consideration of the amendment. Staff has ensured all UDC requirements have been met for the proposed Unified Development Code Amendments. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of PLUDC20250123. Attachments 21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Storage- Proposed Amendments  21.8.9- Outdoor Display and Storage- Redlines  Page 1 of 2 Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non-residential Districts ancillary to a primary use in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non-residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor display and outdoor storage shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS & MSMU GB and PUB GB-2, M-1 and M-2 Outdoor Display - P P P Outdoor Storage - - * Not Permitted in GB * Requires a SUP in PUB P (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated (-) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. General Requirements for all Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Items 1. All areas storing merchandise, equipment, materials, or any other Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage items shall: a. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; b. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require an Amended Site Plan; c. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and d. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. C. Categories of Outdoor Storage and Outdoor Display. 1. Outdoor Display. Outdoor display are items actively for sale or lease that can be perused by the public. Outdoor Display includes items typically seen at home improvement businesses or similar type retail / commercial businesses. Outdoor Display includes items such as pallets of mulch or sod and prefabricated sheds or trailers. a. Individual items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed fifteen feet (15’) in height. b. Stacked items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed five feet (5’) in height. c. The Outdoor Display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary building square footage. 2. Outdoor Storage. Outdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of outdoor storage not classified as Outdoor Display. Outdoor Storage includes, but is not limited to, items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Outdoor Storage also consists of items for sale to include items sold in bulk such as unpackaged dirt, landscape materials, or items associated with a wholesale business. Outdoor Storage Proposed UDC Amendments- Clean Version Page 2 of 2 items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. a. Outdoor storage is prohibited within public right-of-way or fire lanes. b. Outdoor storage shall not be allowed in off-street parking spaces. c. Outdoor storage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height. d. Outdoor storage items shall be enclosed or shall be located at the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right-of-way. 3. Exceptions. a. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. b. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. c. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicles awaiting repair, food trucks and trailers associated with a business may apply for a permit to allow parking on an unpaved area for a period not to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. 1) The City Manager or his/her designee shall receive applications, documentation and issue permits for the temporary parking on unpaved areas during construction or other unique circumstances such as parts shortages as the result of a pandemic. e. Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, and Outdoor Sales Areas are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if the area 1) is attached to and accessible through the primary building; 2) is enclosed utilizing a metal or steel fence material such as wrought iron with masonry columns, chain link fence is not permitted; and 3) is identified on an approved site plan. f. Sidewalk Sales are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if 1) the items for sale are located in front of or adjacent to the primary building and on the pedestrian walkway; and 2) all items for sale are stored inside the primary building overnight. Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 1 of 4 Sec. 21.8.9. Outdoor Display and Storage. A. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage shall be allowed in Non-residential Districts ancillary to a primary use in accordance with this section. Any merchandise, material or equipment situated outdoors in Non-residential Districts shall be subject to the requirements of this section. For the purpose of this section, outdoor storage and displaydisplay and outdoor storage shall be classified into two (2) categories enumerated as shown below. Table 21.8.9 Permitted Outdoor Display and Storage Category OP NS & MSMU GB and PUB GB-2, M-1 and M-2 Outdoor Display and Tempo- rary Outdoor Storage - P P P General Outdoor Storage - - * Not Permitted in GB * Requires a SUP in PUB- P (P) = Use is permitted in district indicated (-) = Use is prohibited in district indicated B. General Requirements for all Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage Items 1. All areas storing merchandise, equipment, materials, or any other Outdoor Display and Outdoor Storage items shall: a. Be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas; b. Be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property additionally any changes to the approved Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage areas shall require an Amended Site Plan; c. Not be located within a required landscape buffer; and d. Not be permitted in off-street parking spaces, within the public right-of-way, fire lane, stacking spaces, areas meant for interior vehicle access, to block windows, entrances, exits, or to impede the ability of pedestrians to use the building, including ADA requirements. BC. Categories of oOutdoor Sstorage and Outdoor dDisplay. 1. Outdoor Display and Temporary Outdoor Storage. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage are displays of items actively for sale or lease that can be perused by the public. Outdoor Display includes items typically seen at home improvement businesses or similar type retail / commercial businesses. Outdoor Display includes items such as pallets of mulch or sod and prefabricated sheds or trailers . that are lightweight and that individually can be easily moved without a mechanical lifting device. a. Individual items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed fifteen feet (15’) in height. b. Stacked items for Outdoor Display cannot exceed five feet (5’) in height. c. The Outdoor Display area shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of the primary building square footage. Proposed UDC Amendments- Red Line Version Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 2 of 4 a. Outdoor display and temporary outdoor storage of goods in individual packaging and not in storage containers which are associated with the primary business on the site may be allowed adjacent to a front principal building wall and may not extend into the public right-of-way. Such storage shall not be permitted to block windows, entrances or exits, and shall not impair the ability of pedestrians to use the building. b. Areas intended for outdoor display must be paved and painted to distinguish them from required off-street parking areas. No outdoor displays shall be allowed in off-street parking areas or fire lanes. 2. General Outdoor Storage. a. General Ooutdoor storage consists of all remaining forms of outdoor storage not classified as Ooutdoor Ddisplay. including Outdoor Storage includes, but is not limited to, items of a large size, mass or volume and that are not easily moved or carried such as used tires, railroad ties, discarded inventory, storage pallets, shipping containers, temporary portable storage facilities/containers and semi trailers not attached to a truck. Outdoor Storage also consists of items for sale to include items sold in bulk such as unpackaged dirt, landscape materials, or items associated with a wholesale business. Outdoor Storage items are not considered Outdoor Display and are not permitted in the front yard of the primary structure. ab. General Ooutdoor storage is prohibited within the public right-of-way or fire lanes. bc. General Ooutdoor storage shall not be allowed in off-street parking spaces. cd. General Ooutdoor storage items shall not exceed a maximum of 20 feet (20') in height. de. General Ooutdoor storage items shall be completely enclosed or shall be located at moved to the rear of the structure, but in no event shall general outdoor storage items be visible from public right-of-way. 3. Outdoor Display and Storage Requirements. a. All outdoor display and storage areas must be clearly shown on the Site Plan submitted for the property. b. Unless specifically authorized elsewhere in the City's ordinances, all outdoor display and storage areas shall be located outside the public right-of-way. 34. Exceptions. a. Vehicles for sale as part of a properly permitted vehicle sales use (including boats and manufactured housing) shall not be considered merchandise, material or equipment subject to the restrictions of this section. b. Such vehicles must be located and displayed on a paved vehicle use area and clearly indicated on the Site Plan. c. Flea markets, open air markets, farmer's markets with a permanent Certificate of Occupancy for such use are not subject to the restrictions of this section. d. Vehicles awaiting repair, food trucks and trailers associated with a business may apply for a permit to allow parking on an unpaved area for a period not to exceed six months during construction or unique circumstances. Formatted: List 3, Indent: Left: 0.66" Created: 2024-11-27 10:11:33 [EST] (Supp. No. 9) Page 3 of 4 1) The City Manager or his/her designee shall receive applications, documentation and issue permits for the temporary parking on unpaved areas during construction or other unique circumstances such as parts shortages as the result of a pandemic. e. Garden Centers, Lumber Yards, and Outdoor Sales Areas are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if the area 1) is attached to and accessible through the primary building; 2) is enclosed utilizing a metal or steel fence material such as wrought iron with masonry columns, chain link fence is not permitted; and 3) is identified on an approved site plan. f. Sidewalk Sales are not considered Outdoor Display or Outdoor Storage if 1) the items for sale are located in front of or adjacent to the primary building and on the pedestrian walkway; and 2) all items for sale are stored inside the primary building overnight. C. Effective Dates. 1. Temporary Limited Non-Conforming Use. Outdoor displays or outdoor storage (temporary or general) described in subsection 21.8.9.B. located on a site on April 30, 2010; in compliance with the provisions of this UDC as in effect on April 12, 2010; and in good working order and actively being used for its intended display or storage purpose on April 30, 2010 may remain in the same location on such site, notwithstanding the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.B. until the earliest to occur of the following: a. the removal of such display or storage from its precise location on April 30, 2010; or b. the failure of the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage to operate or use such display or storage in the manner intended and in effect on April 30, 2010 for a period of three (3) consecutive business days; or c. the reduction in height of any such display or storage that would be governed by subsection 21.8.9.B.2.d. to less than 20 feet (20'); or d. the destruction or damage of such display or storage to the extent of twenty-five (25%) or more of its area or value; or e. December 31, 2013. During such period, the property owner or lessee or the owner of such display or storage may perform minor repair or maintenance of such display or storage and may replace any unit of such display offered for sale or lease that is sold or leased with a like unit offered for sale or lease but shall not substitute other types of items for sale or lease in such display, and shall not replace, enlarge or substitute storage facilities or storage areas that do not comply with subsection 21.8.9.B. In all events, none of such displays or storage shall be in a condition of disrepair or non-operation. 2. Other Outdoor Displays or Outdoor Storage. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage not described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be in compliance with the provisions of subsection 21.8.9.B. on and after May 1, 2010. Outdoor displays and outdoor storage described in subsection 21.8.9.C.1. shall be discontinued within thirty (30) days after the earliest to occur of the condition described in subsections 21.8.9.C.1.a.—e. (Ord. No. 22-S-19, § 1(Exh. A), 4-26-2022) Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.69", Hanging: 0.31" Formatted: Indent: Left: 0.38" PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING: 06/04/2025 Agenda Item 7 A   SUBJECT Current Projects and City Council Status Update   DEVELOPMENT INFORMATION The following is being provided for information purposes only so that the Planning and Zoning Commission is aware of the current status of new site plan applications, status of applications heard by the Commission and recommended for final action by the City Council, and the status of administratively approved applications.  NEW SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS: No new Site Plan Applications were submitted from May 1, 2025, to May 28, 2025. CITY COUNCIL RESULTS: The following development applications were recommended for final action to the City Council  Ordinance 24-S-019 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 3.5 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to General Business District-II (GB-2), generally located 1,700 feet west of the intersection of IH-10 E Access Road and Trainer Hale Road, more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 339775, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.  Denied at the City Council meeting on May 6, 2025  Ordinance 24-S-020 - Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 1.38 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE) to Single-Family Residential/Agricultural District (R-A), more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Number 310235, also known as 9126 Trainer Hale Rd, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas  Approved at the City Council meeting on May 6, 2025  Ordinance 25-S-022- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 20 acres of land from Pre-Development District (PRE), Agricultural District (AD), and Single-Family Residential/ Agricultural District (R-A) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2), generally located approximately 4,800 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Lower Seguin Road, known as 12816 Lower Seguin Rd and 12746 Lower Seguin Road, and more specifically known as Bexar County Property Identification Numbers 310027, 310026, and 310028, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.  Recommended for Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 7, 2025 Scheduled for City Council to take action on June 3, 2025 Ordinance 25-S-023- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 62 acres of land from Planned Development District (PDD) and Pre-Development District (PRE) to Single-Family Residential District (R-2),  generally located approximately 3,800 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Trainer Hale Road, known as Bexar County Property Identification number 310054, a portion of 310053 and a portion of 310061, City of Schertz, Bexar County, Texas.  Recommended for Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 7, 2025 Scheduled for City Council to take action on June 3, 2025 Ordinance 25-S-021- Conduct a public hearing and consider a request to rezone approximately 4.15 acres of land from General Business District (GB) to General Business District-2 (GB-2), generally located approximately 900 feet east of the intersection of FM 1518 and Maske Road, known as 46 Maske Road and 44 Maske Road, Lots 3 and 4, Block 1 of the Maske Road Business Park Subdivision, more specifically known as Guadalupe County Property Identification Numbers 199116, and 199117, City of Schertz, Guadalupe County, Texas.  Recommended for Approval by the Planning and Zoning Commission on May 7, 2025 Scheduled for City Council to take action on June 3, 2025 ADMINISTRATIVELY APPROVED PROJECTS: The following projects were administratively approved from May 1, 2025, to May 28, 2025:   Live Oak Hills Subdivision  A proposed replat of the 41.15-acre Live Oak Hills Subdivision Unit 1, to establish 118 buildable residential lots zoned PDD.