Loading...
25-R-096 Authorizing Task Order-Kimley-Horn for 2025 Master Thoroughfare Plan-Roadway Impact FeeRESOLUTION 25-R-096 A RESOLUTION BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS, AUTHORIZING A TASK ORDER AGREEMENT WITH KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC., FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES RELATED TO THE 2025 MASTER THOROUGHFARE PLAN AND ROADWAY IMPACT FEE UPDATE WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that updates to the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Program are necessary; and WHEREAS, professional services are needed to prepare updates to the Thoroughfare Plan, Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Capital Improvement Plan, and calculation of maximum assessable impact fees for City consideration and use in setting updated impact fee collection rates; and WHEREAS, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., (Kimley-Horn) is an approved on -call Engineering Firm for the City of Schertz; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 252.022(a)(4), of the Texas Local Government Code, the City is not required to seek bids or proposals with respect to a procurement for personal, professional, or planning purposes; and WHEREAS, City staff has determined that Kimley-Horn is uniquely qualified to provide such services for the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that it is in the best interest of the City to approve a task order for Kimley-Horn to provide the necessary professional services for the project. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SCHERTZ, TEXAS THAT: Section 1. The City Council hereby authorizes a task order agreement in substantially the form set forth on Exhibit A with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for professional services related to updates of the City's Master Thoroughfare Plan and Roadway Impact Fee Program for $149,460 and a not to exceed amount of $170,000. Section 2. The recitals contained in the preamble hereof are hereby found to be true, and such recitals are hereby made a part of this Resolution for all purposes and are adopted as a part of the judgment and findings of the City Council. Section 3. All resolutions, or parts thereof, which are in conflict or inconsistent with any provision of this Resolution are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict, and the provisions of this Resolution shall be and remain controlling as to the matters resolved herein. Section 4. This Resolution shall be construed and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State of Texas and the United States of America. Section 5. If any provision of this Resolution or the application thereof to any person or circumstance shall be held to be invalid, the remainder of this Resolution and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall nevertheless be valid, and the City Council hereby declares that this Resolution would have been enacted without such invalid provision. Section 6. It is officially found, determined, and declared that the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted was open to the public and public notice of the time, place, and subject matter of the public business to be considered at such meeting, including this Resolution, was given, all as required by Chapter 551, Texas Government Code, as amended. Section 7. This Resolution shall be in force and effect from and after its final passage, and it is so resolved. PASSED AND APPROVED on the [)`�.. day of G , 2025. CITY OF ERAS 1 Ral h utietriDi, Mayor Sheila Edm�ndson, City Secretary Exhibit A Task Order Agreement TASK ORDER NO. 03 This is Task Order No. 03, consisting of 13 pages. In accordance with Paragraph 1.01, Main Agreement, of the Agreement Between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition dated May 15, 2025, Owner and Engineer agree as follows: 1. TASK ORDER DATA a. I Effective Date of Task Order: b. Owner: l City of Schertz, TX C. Engineer: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. d. I Specific Project (title) 2025 Roadway Impact Fee and Master Thoroughfare J_ Plan Update e. Specific Project The work planned for this task order is associated (description): with preparing an update of the Roadway Impact Fee (RIF) study and Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) to reflect recent annexations and to incorporate five (5) additional recommended connections reflected in the Comprehensive Land Plan adopted by the City in April 2024. This scope of services will provide the City with the technical analysis required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code to determine the maximum assessable roadway impact fee. To conduct the land use assumptions analysis, Kimley- Hom will utilize the demographics from the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) per AAMPO and reflect the 2024 Comprehensive Land Plan land uses. The growth will be compared to historic growth based on building permit history. To create the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), Kimley- Hom will utilize the updated MTP and staff input. f. Related Task Orders Primary task order for this project Supplemented by this Task N/A Order: Superseded by this Task N/A Order: Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition. Copyright° 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 1 of 5 2. BASELINE INFORMATION Baseline Information. Owner has furnished the following Specific Project information to Engineer as of the Effective Date of the Task Order. Engineer's scope of services has been developed based on this information. As the Specific Project moves forward, some of the information may change or be refined, and additional information will become known, resulting in the possible need to change, refine, or supplement the scope of services. Specific Project Title: 2025 Roadway Impact Fee and Master Thoroughfare Plan Update Type and Size of Facility: N/A Description of Improvements: N/A Expected Construction Start: N/A Prior Studies, Reports, Plans: Comprehensive Land Use Plan (adopted April 2024), 2018 Roadway Impact Fee Study, 2017 MTP Update Facility Location(s): Citywide Current Specific Project Budget: $149,460 Funding Sources: Known Design Standards: N/A Known Specific Project N/A Limitations: Specific Project Assumptions: Reference scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025 for additional items Other Pertinent Information: Reference scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025 for additional items 3. SERVICES OF ENGINEER ("SCOPE") A. The specific Basic Services to be provided or furnished by Engineer under this Task Order are: ❑ Exhibit A to Task Order, "Engineer's Services for Task Order," as attached to this specific Task Order. Reference scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025 for detailed scope of base and supplemental services. B. All the services included above comprise Basic Services for purposes of Engineer's compensation under this Task Order, with the exception of Resident Project Representative Services, if any, which are compensated separately. Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition. Copyright® 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 2of5 C. Resident Project Representative (RPR) Services: [RPR services excluded from scope of work] 1. If the Scope established in Paragraph 2.A above includes RPR services, then Exhibit D to Task Order is expressly incorporated in this Task Order by reference. D. Additional Services: Services not expressly set forth as Basic Services in Paragraph 3.A above, and necessary services listed as not requiring Owner's written authorization, or requiring additional effort in an immediate, expeditious, or accelerated manner as a result of unanticipated construction events or Specific Project conditions, are Additional Services, and will be compensated by the method indicated for Additional Services in this Task Order. All other Additional Services require mutual agreement and may be authorized by amending the Task Order as set forth in Paragraph 8.05.13.2 of the Main Agreement, with compensation for such other Additional Services as set forth in the amending instrument. 4. DELIVERABLES SCHEDULE A. In submitting required Documents and taking other related actions, Engineer and Owner will develop a mutually agreeable project schedule at the onset of the project. S. ADDITIONS TO OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES A. Owner shall have those responsibilities set forth in Article 2 of the Main Agreement, and the following supplemental responsibilities that are specific to this Task Order. Reference scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025. 6. TASK ORDER SCHEDULE A. In addition to any schedule provisions provided in Exhibit B or elsewhere, the parties shall develop a mutually agreeable project schedule as part of Task 1: Project Initiation and Management. Reference scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025. 7. ENGINEER'S COMPENSATION A. The terms of payment are set forth in Article 4 of the Main Agreement. Owner shall pay Engineer for services rendered under this Task Order as follows: Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition. Copyright° 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 3of5 Task Description of Service Amount Basis of Compensation 1 Project Initiation and Management $ 17,930.00 [ Lump Sum ] 2 Land Use Assumptions $ 6,575.00 [ Lump Sum ] 3 Thoroughfare Plan Refinements $ 18,240.00 [ Lump Sum ] 4 MTP Review and Impact Fee CIP $ 42,680.00 [ Lump Sum ] 5 Maximum Fee Calculation and Rate Analysis $ 4,640.00 [ Lump Sum ] 6 Financial Credit Calculation Analysis $ 25,000.00 [ Lump Sum j 7 Documentation and Adoption Process $ 34,195.00 [ Lump Sum ] 8 Implementation Plan $ 13,300.00 [ Lump Sum ] 9 Expenses $ 200.00 [ Lump Sum ] TOTAL COMPENSATION $ 149,460.00 C. Compensation items and totals based in whole or in part on Hourly Rates or Direct Labor are estimates only. Lump sum amounts and estimated totals included in the breakdown by phases incorporate Engineer's labor, overhead, profit, reimbursable expenses (if any), and Subconsultants' charges, if any. For lump sum items, Engineer may alter the distribution of compensation between individual phases (line items) to be consistent with services actually rendered but shall not exceed the total lump sum compensation amount unless approved in writing by the Owner. S. ENGINEER'S PRIMARY SUBCONSULTANTS FOR TASK ORDER, AS OF THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE TASK ORDER: A. NewGen — Financial Credit Calculation 9. EXHIBITS AND ATTACHMENTS: A. Exhibit A to Task Order —Engineer's scope and fee proposal dated May 15, 2025 Task Order. EJCDC® E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition. Copyright® 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 4 of 5 Execution of this Task Order by Owner and Engineer makes it subject to the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement and its exhibits and appendices, which Main Agreement, exhibits, and appendices are incorporated by this reference. OWNER: ENGINEER: By: By: Print Name: Print Name: Nicholas Holscher, P.E. Title: Title: Vice President Engineer's License or Firm's F-928, Kimley-Horn and Certificate No. (if required): Associates, Inc. State of: Texas DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE FOR TASK ORDER: Name: Kathryn Woodlee, PE Name: Amy Avery, PE Title: City Engineer Title: Vice President Address: 11 Commercial Place Address: 10101 Reunion Place, Suite 400 Schertz, TX 78154 San Antonio, TX 78216 E-Mail kwoodlee@schertz.com E-Mail amy.avery@kimley-horn.com Address: Address: Phone: 210-619-1825 Phone: 210-321-3442 Date: Date: June 17, 2025 Task Order. EJCDC1 E-505, Agreement between Owner and Engineer for Professional Services —Task Order Edition. Copyright* 2020 National Society of Professional Engineers, American Council of Engineering Companies, and American Society of Civil Engineers. All rights reserved. Page 5 of 5 Kimley»>Horn May 15, 2025 Kathryn J. Woodlee, P.E., CFM City Engineer City of Schertz - Engineering 11 Commercial Place Schertz, Texas 78154 RE: 2025 Roadway Impact Fee and Master Thoroughfare Plan Update Scope and Fee Proposal Dear Ms. Woodlee: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ("Kimley-Hom) is pleased to submit this scope and fee proposal to the City of Schertz ("City') for professional engineering services to update the Roadway Impact Fee Study and Master Thoroughfare Plan Map ("Project"). PROJECT UNDERSTANDING Based on coordination with the City, Kimley-Horn understands that the goal of this project is to update the Roadway Impact Fee (RIF) study. In addition to the RIF update, the City needs to update the Master Thoroughfare Plan (MTP) to reflect recent annexations and to incorporate five (5) additional recommended connections reflected in the Comprehensive Land Plan adopted by the City in April 2024. This scope of services will provide the City with the technical analysis required by Chapter 395 of the Texas Local Government Code to determine the maximum assessable roadway impact fee. To conduct the land use assumptions analysis, Kimley-Horn will utilize the demographics from the traffic analysis zones (TAZs) per AAMPO and reflect the 2024 Comprehensive Land Plan land uses. The growth will be compared to historic growth based on building permit history. To create the Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (CIP), Kimley-Horn will utilize the updated MTP and staff input. The MTP update can be adopted concurrent with the RIF update, however the alignments must be set prior to the development of the CIP. The project is broken into two phases. The first phase is the evaluation and analysis component, and the second phase is adoption and implementation. SCOPE OF SERVICES This project is anticipated to include the following tasks broken into 2 phases: Phase 1: Evaluation and Analvsis Task 1: Project Initiation and Management Task 2: Land Use Assumptions Task 3: Thoroughfare Plan Refinements Task 4: MTP Review and Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan (CIP) Task 5: Maximum Fee Calculations and Rate Analysis Task 6: Credit Calculation Kim ey>>> Horn Page 2 Phase 2: Adoption and Implementation Task 7: Documentation and Adoption Process Task 8: Administration Tools Task 1: Proiect Initiation and Management 1. Proiect Management. 2. Project Kick -Off Meetinn. Kimley-Hom will meet with the City for a formal kick-off meeting for the Roadway Impact Fee project. During this meeting, the scope and City contacts will be determined for each task. 3. Proiect Team Status Meetings and Coordination. Kimley-Hom will participate in reoccurring meetings with City staff. These meetings will be held on specific days and times as agreed by the City. A maximum of two (2) hours will be anticipated for each meeting. These may be either in - person calls or conference calls. Kimley-Horn will prepare notes from each meeting. A maximum of six (6) meetings will be held. 4. Project Status Reports and Invoicing. Kimley-Hom will prepare and submit monthly status reports regarding project schedule and critical tasks. Kimley-Hom will prepare monthly invoices. 5. Service Areas. Kimley-Hom will meet with the City to confirm the roadway impact fee service area boundaries within the existing City limits consistent with the six (6) mile limit required by Chapter 395 of the Local Government Code. Kimley-Hom anticipates a maximum of four (4) service areas will remain for roadway impact fees. Any recently completed annexations will be incorporated as provided. Task 2: Land Use Assumptions 1. Data Collection. Kimley-Hom will coordinate with the City to obtain the following data: a. TAZ Demographic Data per AAMPO b. City Contacts — The City shall provide the organization structure and contact information for the applicable City staff involved with the land use assumptions. c. Comprehensive Master Plans — The City shall identify and provide the City's most recent comprehensive master plans. d. Building Permit History— The City shall provide the Consultant with available building permit history (both residential and non-residential) for the previous ten (10) years. e. Currently adopted Land Use Assumptions for Water and Wastewater Impact Fees. f. Maps — The City shall provide the Consultant with available GIS shapefiles, associated databases, and layer files in ESRI ArcGIS10.x format. All data shall be projected in NAD 83 State Plane, North Central Texas Zone coordinates. Data should include: i. Current Zoning Map; ii. Future Land Use Plan Map; iii. City / County Parcel Data; iv. City Limits and ETJ Map; and v. Most recent digital orthophotograph (DOQ) of the City. 2. Ten -Year Land Use Assumptions. Chapter 395 states that impact fees may only be used to pay for items included in the Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan and attributable to new service units projected over a period of time not to exceed ten (10) years. Based on guidance from the City regarding projected development pattems and growth rates and collected data, Kimley-Hom Kimley>»Horn Page 3 will develop the Ten -Year Land Use Assumptions for the 10-year planning window. Kimley-Hom will complete the demographic table for each roadway service area. Task 3. Thoroughfare Plan Refinements 1. Data Collection and Base File Setup. Kimley-Horn will utilize publicly available resources to obtain the following data: a. Aerial imagery b. Parcel linework and information c. Lida r/topog raphy data d. Floodplain information e. Railroad alignments f. Major utility alignments The City shall provide Kimley-Horn any available data regarding platting information, planned developments, or anything else applicable to the alignment of the MTP roadways. 2. New Connector Alignments. Kimley-Hom will analyze up to two (2) alternatives per alignment at a conceptual level for the MTP update. The City will provide the currently adopted MTP in GIS format. Kimley-Horn will work with the City to develop a constraint map (buildings, flood plains, contours, and utilities) to aid in the recommendation of an alignment for each of the five (5) proposed new connections reflected in the Comprehensive Plan. No roadway design or survey services are included as part of this task. 3. Alignment Updates. Kimley-Hom will remap approximately ten (10) alignment segments of planned roadways on the City's current MTP. No roadway design or survey services are included as part of this task. 4. Revised MTP Map. Kimley-Horn will create a revised map that updates the currently adopted roadway master thoroughfare plan (MTP) with the recommendations provided by City staff and areas studied based on the Comprehensive Land Plan. City staff will perform the necessary coordination tasks to have the MTP revision considered by City Council. Task 4. MTP Review and Impact Fee CIP 1. Data Collection. Kimley-Hom will coordinate with the City to obtain the following data: a. City contacts — City shall provide the organization structure and contact information for the applicable City staff involved with the completion of the roadway capacity analysis and roadway impact fee CIP. b. Transportation Plan — Kimley-Horn will use the MTP revised in Task 3. c. Traffic Counts — The City shall provide any available data (current and historical) for all roadway segments on the current MTP. Kimley-Hom will obtain recently completed traffic counts for state highway facilities from TxDOT. If additional counts are necessary, Kimley-Horn will utilize publicly available big data, such as RITIS or others similar, to obtain recent counts. d. Historical Project Costing Information — The City shall provide Kimley-Hom with available data on the actual City costs for previously completed arterial roadway improvement projects to assist in the development of planning level project costs for future projects and to include any project costs for previously completed projects with excess capacity available to serve future growth. Kimley»>Horn Page 4 2. MTP Review. Though they can be adopted concurrently the MTP alignments need to be finalized prior to formulating the Roadway Capital Improvement Plan. Kimley-Hom will rely upon field verification of the existing inventory of the City's roadway network from the adopted MTP, and review for any recent updates to the network based on City staff input. 3. Ten -Year Growth Projections and Capacity Analvsis. a. Kimley-Hom will identify the service units for new development and the average trip length. Using the 11th Edition of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, Kimley-Horn will incorporate trip generation and pass -by trip rates. b. Kimley-Horn will perform an analysis of existing conditions. This will include a determination of roadway capacities, volumes, vehicle -miles of supply, vehicle -miles of demand, existing excess capacity, and existing deficiencies. c. Kimley-Horn will project traffic conditions for the ten-year planning period, the target year for the impact fee growth projections. This will include growth and new demand for each service area established in Task 2. Kimley-Horn will determine the capacity available for new growth. 4. Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan a. Kimley-Horn will assist the City to develop a Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan which will include cost projections for anticipated projects to be included in the study. The Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan will include existing oversized facilities and proposed facilities designed to serve future development. The Roadway Impact Fee Capital Improvements Plan shall include a general description of the project and a project cost projection. Planning level cost projections for future projects will be prepared based on discussion with local roadway construction contractors, City staff, and previous experience with roadway construction costs. The City shall provide actual City cost information for previously completed projects with excess capacity and any cost contribution to County, State, Federal, or developer constructed projects. Note: Due to the variety of unknowns associated with roadway project costs projections (ROW acquisition, utility relocations, etc.), the planning level project cost projections utilized in the roadway impact fee analysis should not be used for any future capital improvement planning within the City. b. Kimley-Horn will identify the portion of projected improvements required to serve existing demand and the portion of project improvements required to serve new development within the 10-year planning period. c. Provide Roadway Impact Fee CIP Review Packet (which will be included within the Appendix of the final report) Task 5. Maximum Fee Calculation and Rate Analysis 1. Pre -Credit Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fee Calculation. Using the newly developed ten-year growth projections, roadway impact fee capital improvements plan, and capacity available for new growth, Kimley-Horn will determine the cost of roadway improvements by service area, the maximum costs per service unit, and the resulting pre -credit maximum assessable roadway impact fees by service area. Kimley-Horn will incorporate the financial analysis performed in Task 4B to determine the maximum assessable impact fee per service unit. 2. Financial Analysis. A financial analysis for the credit calculation will not be performed unless Task 5 is authorized. Prior to authorization of Task 5, 50% of the pre -credit maximum assessable Kimley>»Horn Page 5 roadway impact fee calculated in Task 4A will be utilized to determine the maximum assessable roadway impact fee. Task 6. Financial Credit Calculation Analysis 1. Financial Credit Calculation. Using the impact fee eligible capital improvement costs and projected service units, a financial subconsultant will calculate maximum assessable full -cost recovery impact fees for the designated ten-year period for roadway facilities for up to four (4) service areas. The financial subconsultant will provide forecasted cash flows for the maximum assessable impact fee for the ten-year period based on projected capital improvement program's implementation schedule (if available) and growth in projected service units. Kimley-Horn will work in conjunction with the financial subconsultant to incorporate the Capital Improvements Plan identified in Task 3.D. 2. Meetinggs. The financial subconsultant will prepare for and attend the following meetings: a. Two (2) meetings with City staff to review the proposed Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees with credit calculation. Task 7. Documentation and Adoption Process 1. Document. Kimley-Hom will provide both a draft and final Roadway Impact Fee Report. The report will include: a. Land Use Assumptions; b. Roadway service areas; c. Roadway CIP; d. Narrative of the impact fee methodology; e. Impact fee calculations; f. Land Use Vehicle -Mile Equivalency Table; and g. Supporting Exhibits. h. Electronic (.pdf) copy of the Draft Roadway Impact Fee Report. 2. Adoption Process. a. Kimley-Hom will collect information on actual roadway impact fees collected for up to five (5) benchmark cities for up to three (3) different land uses (likely residential, commercial, and industrial land uses). This information will be provided to the City in electronic (.xls) tabular format for use in the development of comparison tables. b. Kimley-Horn will review the proposed Roadway Impact Fee Ordinance as prepared by the City Attorney. It is anticipated the City Attorney will require exhibits from the Roadway Impact Fee Report to be included in the ordinance. We recommend the City coordinate with their Attorney to ensure they will be able to prepare the ordinance during Task 4. The City will organize and submit advertisements to the local paper for the public hearings. The City will prep the documents needed for advisory committee meetings and Council. c. It is anticipated that Kimley-Horn will prepare for and attend each of the following meetings (up to 5 meetings): i. Two (2) CIAC public hearings to present the Land Use Assumptions, CIP, and Maximum Assessable Roadway Impact Fees; ii. Two (2) City Council public hearings to present the Roadway Impact Fee, including the Land Use Assumptions, Roadway Impact Fee CIP and Maximum Assessable Impact Roadway Fees; and 0 Kimley>»Horn Page 6 iii. One (1) City Council meeting where it adopts the ordinance and establishes the actual Roadway Impact Fees. Kimley-Horn assumes that the MTP update and RIF update adoptions will occur concurrently. If they are not adopted through the same series of meetings, additional meetings will need to be added to this task by amendment. Task 8. Implementation Tools 1. Impact Fee Estimator Worksheet. Kimley-Horn will create a Roadway Impact Fee estimator spreadsheet tool to assist in calculating a development's roadway impact fees based on the impact fee rates adopted in Task 6. ASSUMPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS The following assumptions serve as the basis for development of this scope of work and proposed fee included in the attached project work plan: ASSUMPTIONS • City of Schertz will provide electronic copies of the GIS shapefiles associated with the MTP and Land Plan The City shall provide the Consultant with available GIS shapefiles, associated databases, and layer files in ESRI ArcGIS10.X format. All data shall be projected in NAD 83 State Plane, North Central Texas Zone coordinates. Data should include: 1. Current Zoning Map; 2. Future Land Use Plan Map; 3. City / County Parcel Data; 4. City Limits and ETJ Map; and 5. Most recent digital orthophotograph (DOQ) of the City. City of Schertz will provide a PDF copy of the current Land Plan, MTP and Roadway Impact Fee Study EXCLUSIONS The following tasks have been excluded from scope of services and requested fee, but can be completed by Kimley-Hom as an additional service should the project require or City need that service. • Public Outreach associated with the proposed alignments for the new connections identified during the Comprehensive Land Plan update process FEE AND BILLING In accordance with the below fee summary table, Kimley-Hom will perform the above outlined scope of services, including subconsultant services and project expenses, for a lump sum fee of $149,460. Kimley- Hom will submit invoices to the City on a monthly basis for services performed. Each invoice will include a summary of work completed for the corresponding month. Kimley»>Horn Page 7 We appreciate the opportunity to work with the City and look forward to successfully completing this project. Please don't hesitate to contact me at oen.¢lett0kimley-ho _ or (512) 418-4523 should you have any questions on the proposed scope and fee Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. TBPE# 928 By: Ben Plett, P.E., PTOE Amy Avery, P.E., PTOE Project Manager Vice President Attachments 1 — Project Work Plan § ) k. * © ■aea� . 0 0 a 0 s | - _ , | , a ■s@ ■; ! /■ § !§ ~ � ```~ -`© _ ■,;�R _�, � ■a; ■e § - }� \ ! � !» ! / ®! 2 ! ■ ! k! L) ■ ! ! �{! G2 . % ! | &|2)� ��. `:9S2 t!!!; ! Akre§ , �&. !_ | |,� §2 . . | 3 �!!,!; ■{2 '� ,k�e- ;awl; .�! !J! ,_ I ° I§ | 2 ! ! |!a§! ■�2 ! r ! �eeei! km /©*,� &2[k) !!! )i !!� 8 k !!