09-23-1997
e
e
.
PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES
The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission conducted a Public
Hearing on Tuesday, Sept. 23, 1997 at 7:00 p.m. in the Municipal
Complex Bob Andrews Conference Room, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz,
Texas. Those present were as follows:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CITY STAFF
ERNIE EVANS-CHAIRMAN,
DAVID RICHMOND, VICE-CHAIRMAN
PIA JARMAN, SECRETARY
GARY WALLACE
TONY MORENO
KEITH VAN DINE
KEN GREENWALD, COUNCILMAN, ex oficio
STEVE SIMONSON,
ASST. CITY MANAGER
MARY YBARRA
PLANNING SECRETARY
MEMBERS ABSENT
OTHERS PRESENT
None
Judy & Dennis Dietz,
1236 Live Oak Rd.
Maggie Pena,
1037 Live Oak Rd.
Albert Pena,
1035 Live Oak Rd.
Christy Niland,
1033 Live Oak Rd.
Evelyn Niland,
1033 Live Oak Rd.
James & Ruby Bindseil,
749 Maske Rd.
George Strasser,
Destiny Homes
Phil Wuest,
Wuest's Inc.
Jim Preston,
Schertz Bus. Park
Chad Jones,
Wuest's Inc.
T.J. Cantwell,
Berry Creek Subd.
Don McCrary,
Don McCrary Assoc.
Wade McGinnis,
Corridor Properties
Steve Hurwitz, ARC/
Pecan Grove Mobile
Home Park
Helen Gutierrez,
(arrived late)
.
.
-1-
.
.
e
e
#1 CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Ernie Evans called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Chairman Evans explained the procedures to be followed at the
public hearing and thanked everyone for their concerned interest.
The City Council public hearing on this item will be held Oct. 7,
1997.
#2 PUBLIC HEARING: To Receive Citizen Input on a
Helen Gutierrez for Street Name Change of Live
Gutierrez Lane. (PC #327-97)
Request from
Oak Road to
Chairman Evans asked for staff input.
Steve Simonson stated this is a request from Helen Gutierrez
concerning a street name change. In accordance with the city
ordinance 24 letters were sent out to property owners within 200'
of this roadway. Four (4) letters were returned and all were in
opposition. We have been provided with copy of a petition by those
that live along Live Oak Rd. all of whom are totally against this
name change. Some of the names on the petition are part of the
group that was sent right-of-way notices. There are 9 oppositions
on the petition received previous to the public hearing. In
addition property owner, "Monterey Medina" which owns a great
amount of property along Live oak Road is also in opposition.
Ernie Evans
Gutierrez?
asked if there was a representative present for
There was no one present at this time.
Mrs.
Ernie Evans advised that the floor was open for citizen input.
Maggie pena stated she is a property owner living on Live Oak Rd.
since 1967. To change the name of the street would be a great
expense to her such as: driver license, insurance, bank accounts
etc. She feels this is not the only street that can be named after
the Gutierrez family. Schertz has a great number of new streets
coming in and Mrs. Pena feels one of these streets can be
dedicated to the Gutierrez family. This is the second time a
request on this issue has been brought forth and it is a very
stressful issue on everyone's part.
Evelyn Niland of 1033 Live Oak Rd. stated she is in agreement with
Maggie pena on this issue, she has been out of town and brought in
her letter in opposition to the issue.
Judy Dietz of 1236 Live Oak Rd. stated she and her husband
represent themselves and 12 families living in the Persimmon Apts.
plus themselves. More than half of the tenants are senior citizens
ranging in age from 70 to 92 years who are on a budget. and a change
like this would create many financial and other problems that would
. be stressful. For this reason they are in opposition.
-2-
e
e
James
he is
stated
street
Bindseil whose property is adjacent to Live Oak Rd.
in opposition of the name change. Both for the
and because he thinks the road should stay as is and
should be looked at for the Gutierrez's if required.
stated
reasons
another
.
Albert pena of 1035 Live Oak Rd. is a new property owner who
stated that he did not receive a notice of the public hearing from
the City. Mr. pena stated he is in opposition to the name change.
Mr. pena stated he is a new owner and would have to change a lot
of documents that he just recently paid to acquire the land, like
the deed etc. Mr. pena felt that there are new streets being
built in Schertz that can be dedicated to the Gutierrez family.
steve Simonson explained to Mr. Pena that the property owners
names are obtained from the City tax office. Current tax roll
records. Unfortunately, at times, the office does not receive
change of information in time to update the records.
Maggie pena stated she did not know Helen Gutierrez. Helen
Gutierrez, now present, acknowledged her presence. In the exchange
that followed, between Mrs. pena and Ms. Gutierrez established
that Helen was not a Gutierrez by marriage and that she was not
Helen Gutierrez Campos but "No, it's Helen Gutierrez. !...ook it up
in the phonebook."
With no comments, or questions from the Commissioners, or further
comments from the public on the request for the street name change
Chairman Evans closed the Public Hearing.
.
13 ADJOURNMENT OF PUBLIC HEARING:
Chairman Ernie Evans adjourned the Public Hearing at 7:10 p.m.
The Schertz Planning and Zoning Commission convened in a regular
session, after the public hearing, in the Municipal Complex Bob
Andrews Conference Room, 1400 Schertz Parkway, Schertz, Texas.
14 CALL TO ORDER:
Chairman Ernie Evans called the meeting to order at 7:10 p.m.
15 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Regular Session Sept. 9, 1997
Pia Jarman moved to approve the minutes of the Regular .Session
Sept. 9, 1997 as written. Tony Moreno seconded the motion which
carried as follows:
Ayes: David Richmond, Ernie Evans, Pia Jarman, Gary Wallace, Tony
Moreno.
. Abstention: Keith Van Dine (absent at said meeting)
-3-
e
e
16 STATUS OF FINAL PLATS:
. There were none.
17 BOA STATUS:
Pia Jarman stated the BOA met on Monday Sept. 15, 1997 to deal
with the request from Continental Homes, 3516 Sara~oga Place
Carolina Crossing Unit 1 for a Special Exception to the Zoning
Ordinance for a front yard setback from 25' to 24.7' and a side
yard setback from 5' to 3.4'. After a great deal of discussion the
board granted the variance for the front and side yard variances
with the stipulation that the 15' separation be maintained between
the house presently constructed on lot 18 block 1 and any house to
be built on lot 17 block 1.
The home owners were present and the concern was if a smaller house
is built in that area would it bring the value of their homes down.
Someone suggested that a park be put on lot l7.
The Board members strongly recommended that Continental Homes
representatives meet with the Home Owners Association to resolve
questions and concerns raised by home owners on this issue and
other matters.
. 48 CITIZENS' INPUT OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS:
There were none.
.9 CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION: Request from Hele;1 Gutierrez
for a Street Name Change from Live Oak Road to Gutierrez Lane. (PC
#327-97).
Steve Simonson reiterated the procedures that were
information given in the Public Hearing earlier.
received during the meeting with a total of five
opposition.
followed and the
One letter was
(5) letters in
Ernie Evans asked Helen Gutierrez if she would like to address the
Commission? Helen Gutierrez replied, no.
Helen Gutierrez asked "How many oppositions do you need?" Ernie
Evans commented "If you are referring to the Public Hearing
portion", the Public Hearing is to hear input from citizens who are
affected by an issue. Once the Public Hearing is closed the
Commission considers how to make recommendations on the issue. A
recommendation will be made this evening to City Council. City
Council will then hold a Public Hearing and will make the final
decision.
.
-4-
e
e
Helen Gutierrez
change was.
information on
the time.
asked what the history on the Wiederstei',- Rd.
Ernie Evans commented he cannot fu~nish
this issue because he was not on the Comuission
name
any
at
.
Steve Simonson stated there were two Live Oak Roads in the City
limits, the one being discussed tonight and Live Oak Road in the
Live Oak Hills Subdivision. The long range planning of the
Commission was an east/west thoroughfare for the future. Between
the City of Schertz and Cibolo there are no future pla~s for the
area. with the development of Live Oak Hills, Wiede~stein Rd.
(Live Oak Rd.) needed to connect with 3009 and eventual~y connect
with FM 1103. With two Live Oak Roads it was decided to hold
Public Hearings for the request of the name change of Live Oak Rd
to Wiederstein Road for continuity to 1103 and back to 1518. Selma
did not have a problem with the name change at the time. After the
Public Hearing phase and there being no opposition, C5.":y Council
approved the name change.
Pia Jarman asked if 6 plus 9 is the total of oppositions? Steve
Simonson commented some of the 9 are the same as t'>e letters
received. Out of the 5 letters returned 3 are the same as on the
petition and two that are not on the petition. Resurrection
Baptist Church and Monterey Medina are in opposition.
.
Helen Gutierrez stated that the people in opposition were new
comers to the City. The land had been owned by the Gutierrez
family for a long time.
Chairman Evans explained to the citizens that the Commission could
speak with Helen Gutierrez and that the public was not allowed to
speak in this session. The Public Hearing had been closed and
added that there will be another hearing. before the Ci~y Council
for citizen input on this issue.
With no further discussion, questions or comments from the
Commissioners, Chairman Evans asked for a motion.
Gary Wallace moved to forward the request from Helen Gutierrez for
the street name change of Live Oak Road to Gutierrez La:ne to City
Council recommending disapproval. Pia Jarman seconded the motion
which carried as follows:
Ayes: Ernie Evans, Pia Jarman, Tony Moreno, Gary Wallace.
Opposed: Keith Van Dine
Abstention: David Richmond (due his late arrival he had not heard
all the citizens' comments.)
Ernie Evans explained to the citizens that the Commiss~on
forward the request to City Council with a recommendat.Lon.
Council will hold a Public Hearing on October 7, 1997, a
decision will be made at that time.
would
City
final
.
-5-
e
e
flO CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION: Request from ''l:lests Inc.
for a Variance to the Sign Ordinance for the Pic N Pac at FM 78.
(PC #343-97).
.
Steve Simonson stated that when Pic n Pac first requested signage
for the location the request was for onsite signs on the buildings
being leased, the only sign on the road would be the Pic N Pac sign
at the location now. This request is wi thin the parame':ers of the
City Ordinance but the request also is applicable to u shopping
center sign configuration. This is a serious change for this area,
the sign is within the height and size requirements.
Ernie Evans asked if it was a replacement for the existing sign or
an additional sign pole. Steve Simonson commented it would have to
be a replacement because the city ordinance allows only one free
standing sign for the location.
Ernie Evans asked is this a replacement for the existing sign?
Chad Jones and Phil Wuest representing Pic N Pac replied, it is an
additional sign request.
Steve Simonson stated in accordance with the City Ordinance, two
free standing signs are not allowed for one location.
.
Chad Jones stated the Center has changed he and is requesting a
variance for an additional sign. Pic N Pac is the pr:.ma.ry tenant
and would like one sign stating it is a Pic N Pac Texa~o and one
sign at the other end of the property with Pic N Pac on top and
listing the tenants underneath.
Steve Simonson stated in the Mall Sign Ordinance, if you do not
advertise the same name on both signs this is alloT"red. This
request is advertising the same name twice and therefore it
constitutes two free standing signs.
Chad Jones asked what constitutes a Mall Sign?
replied, one for multi-tenant use.
:3teve Simonson
Pia Jarman stated on Page 75 in the UDC the definition of Mall Sign
and also Article 9, 7.5 D 2 states "signs located in the general
business district will be a minmum of 350' from any :cesidential
zoned property." If the sign is allowed will it be 3~O' from the
first residence.
David Richmond asked if one of the principals would reci1J1sider the
request for a replacement sign with Pic N Pac being on ';],e top and
Texaco being below it. Chad Jones stated Texaco has a strict
policy it has to be on top. David Richmond added what .>,8 the need
to have Pic N Pac on the Texaco sign? Chad Jones r8plied, it
brands the Texaco as to what it is.
David Richmond asked does Pic N Pac need to be on both signs? Chad
. Jones replied, yes.
-6-
e
e
Pia Jarman stated that looking at the Pic N Pac sign design with
two empty spaces, it is always a concern that when you have empty
spaces, you see them yet broken, etc. Chad Jones stated the signs
are well maintained at all times.
.
David Richmond stated Pic N Pac is bound severely by 'lTe::aco and is
forcing the city to grant a variance. There are other a:_ ternati ves
to look at. In the widening of FM 78 these signs will ~ave to be
relocated anyway.
Pia Jarman stated if the problem is Texaco why is Pic ~ ?ac making
the request and not Texaco?
Pia Jarman moved to deny the request from Wuests IrK;, for a
variance to the sign for the Pic N Pac on FM 78 as submitted.
Keith Van Dine seconded the motion which carried unanimo11sly.
#11 CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION: Request from Destiny Homes
for Bandit Signs on FM 3009/Schertz Parkway. (PC #344-S~)
Steve Simonson stated Destiny Homes is requesting permission for
bandit signs on FM 3009 and Schertz Parkway, directing ~raffic to
the model home on IH 35. It was explained to Mr. O"~".tman that
bandit signs were not allowed on FM 3009/Schertz Parkwav. It was
also relayed to Mr. Ortman that there is enough signage on IH 35.
.
Tony Moreno asked how many signs was Destiny Homes reqnesting as
well as the location of these sign?
George Strasser representing Destiny Homes, stated the request is
for a maximum of 6 signs at the intersection of Schertz Parkway and
IH 35, on the frontage road of IH 35 and Schertz Pa~0~ay. Pia
Jarman stated according to the letter the request is for bandit
signs along FM 3009 and Schertz Parkway, no'c. -,-....u IH 35
intersection.
The Commissioners commented the City Ordinance and t.ne
Dept. do not allow any bandit type signage on IH35. Pia
cited the ordinances in question from the UDC, Article-
3.1 C and Article 7 Section 2.7 H.
Highway
Jarman
Section
David Richmond stated bandit signs that the Commission has been
asked to approve have been for builders in a developmen~ in the
City. This request is for signage to the sale office. The City
Ordinance states, "each builder who is developing areas T,,7i thin the
confines of this Code", Destiny Homes is not a bui.ider of a
Subdivision in the City. The requested bandit sians would be
drawing attention to the sales office, not to a builder (~dvertising
a development in the City. David said he had difficulty
recognizing Destiny Homes as a builder of a Schertz subd \Tision
.
George Strasser said customers have purchased prope::T.\l . :.~ the City
and are builinging Destiny Homes on them. "What is 'c..ne difference
if we take on a whole subdivision or sell individual lo~" on which
Destiny Homes are built?
-7-
e
e
.
David Richmond replied that "bandit" signs or directional signs of
developers are to direct people to subdivisions ~~ 'lhich the
developers have model homes. In this instance the d:rectional
signs are to sales office and model home oui:s-"_d,:;; of any
subdivision.
Referring to what Pia had cited about bandit signs alloT~ed to each
builder "developing areas" wi thin the confines of this '~ode. Gary
Wallace stated he finds it hard to define the type o~ building
Destiny Homes purposes to be doing as building in "an Cl:::"'.,a".
Gary Wallace moved to deny the request from Destiny I-low,,; Inc. for
bandit signs on FM 3009/Schertz Parkway. Keith Van Dine seconded
the motion which carried unanimously.
#12 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Request
Properties, Ltd. for a Multi-Use sign on IH 35/FM
Loop Rd. (PC #342-97)
froJ'l. Corridor
300:'/ /Corridor
Steve Simonson stated this property has not been deveJop2ti. In the
discussion with Taco Cabana when the request for the 'Ie. sign was
denied, they agreed to the authorized signage on FM 3009 plus on
site building signs. Steve Simonson commented in subsequent
discussions with Barshop on signage for their tenants: Barshop
mentioned that no more lots would go into that site an.d t.hat they
anticipated all to be fast food restaurants.
.
Ernie Evans asked "is the 18.7' sign a replacement for what was
approved previously"? Steve Simonson commented i 1: was not
explained whether this is a replacement or Taco Cabana is going to
keep their own sign. David Richmond stated, "this is something we
need to know."
Wade McGinnis representing "Barshop & Oles" stated t:n,~ 1V['-, i ti -tenant
sign on Taco Cabana's property which is the 18.7 " sig~l 's in lieu
of another 18.7' sign on the property. No other sign structure
will be requested except for the berm monument signs at curb
entrances. The request is based on the development of the property
at present, we envision the multi-user sign on IH35/3U'.-'9 and on
each of the three lots having monuments identifying -UtE! di fferent
businesses. The request is two berm signs per business and the
multi-user sign commented Mr. McGinnis.
Steve Simonson stated that there was no request for b(~rFl signs on
the original proposal from Taco Cabana. The request is still more
signage than they are authorized.
Ernie Evans stated the concept is good for the sig~a?H but the 2
berm signs and the request of the 18.7' sign, wouJ..d ,:)>;ceE=>d the
authorized number of signs.
.
-8-
e
e
.
Steve Simonson stated that the request is for two multi-tenant
signs neither being on specific corners. The C~t~~ Ordinance
states, if you own the corner property, two free stan6;Lc signs are
authorized, one on each street side. The concern ~s ddvertising
the same business on two monument signs.
If this is an issue, Wade Ginnis said, "We'll agree t.o co berm
sign per lot". It is just that most tenants request SiJ:-';lage at
each curb entrance.
Steve Simonson in regard to the berm signs, in tho original
proposal that Taco Cabana had agreed to there were no b;cm signs.
Steve said he had missed this issue because in the J.ett~~r it said
"up to 6", he assumed they meant a total of all signs: berm signs,
IH 35, and 3009 sign.
Ernie liked the concept of the 18 footer with everybody on it. He
also thought the one berm sign issue no one would object to. But
the 70' sign is certainly more than the ordinance pro7~des for,
added to the other signage requested. Wade McGinn:_::; asked for
clarification on the berm/monument signs. Stev(~ ;,d.j,:, the one
monument/berm sign per lot is authorized; it is the con'~c:'pt of the
two free standing multi-tenant signs advertising the same people
which is at issue. The City ordinance allows two free standing
signs if the property in question is clearly on two cor~0~S, if you
are on a major interstate, limited access highway.
.
Keith Van Dine asked what the difference was between ~nlS request
and the previous Pic N Pac one. Steve Simonson said t~Jlere vms a
confusion in terminology "remodeling" and "replacing". Pic N Pac
and adjoining offices/establishments are in a corner siulation, if
Pic N Pac is on the Texaco sign on FM 78 as we~las on a
multi-tenant sign facing Cloverleaf, it is like Taco Cabana being
advertised on FM 3009 and IH 35 as well.
Wade McGinnis asked does the Commission have the authori~y to grant
the request if it was amended this evening. Ernie Evans replied
no. If it was minor it would not be a problem. In this case this
request would have to be staffed by the City. ThE~ rEKfU(=!!::t can be
brought to Mr. Simonson for modification and ba,~'{ T,O the
Commission for action. Ernie Evans added that_ the dHpt.: c and width
of the sign is also needed.
Pia Jarman moved to deny the
for a Multi-Use sign on
presented tonight. Gary
carried unanimously.
request from Corridor Prope~~ies, Ltd.
IH 35/FM 3009/Corridor Loop Rd. as
Wallace seconded the motion which
413 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Reques.t fri)U rfri '-County
Business & Industrial Park for Preliminary Repla.t A:)proval of
. Keatts/Close Subdivision (PC #340-97))
-9-
e
e
Steve Simonson stated the plat has several errors: the date of the
flood plain map, topographic information. This is a replat of an
existing plat.
.
Ernie Evans asked for clarification in the acreage, there are three
different acreage numbers. Steve Simonson stated this would be
corrected. Ernie Evans asked Mr. Simonson to examine the
easements on Block 5, lot 12 to see if the numbers were reversed.
Gary Wallace moved to approve the request from Tri-County Business
& Industrial Park for Preliminary Replat Approval of Keatts/Close
Subdivision contingent upon: correction of date on the flood
plain, inclusion of topographic information, easement correction
and acreage specification. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion
which carried unanimously.
114 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Request from 3009-S,
Ltd. for Final Plat Approval of Berry Creek Subdivision, Unit 2
(PC #317-97)
Steve Simonson stated all corrections have been made as requested
by the Commission on this plat.
Keith Van Dine moved to approve the request from 3009-S, Ltd.
Final Plat Approval of Berry Creek Subdivision, Unit 2.
Moreno seconded the motion which carried unanimously.
for
Tony
.
115 CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION:
Christine Preston for Preliminary Replat
Business Park (PC #341-97)
Request
Approval
from
of
Jim &
Schertz
Steve Simonson stated several items need to be corrected: panel
number is incorrect, reference to park land fees should be deleted
as well as reference to CPS, that property is located in the AICUZ
should be noted, and show property owners of lot 23.
David Richmond moved to approve the request from Jim and Christine
Preston for Preliminary Replat approval of Schertz Business Park
contingent upon the observance of all items mentioned in the
discussion. Keith Van Dine seconded the motion which carried
unanimously.
116 CONSIDER AND DISCUSS: Future of Pecan Grove Mobile Home
Park-Steve Hurwitz, Affordable Residential Communities (ARC).
.
Steve Hurwitz introduced himself and thanked the Commission for
allowing the presentation of the future plans for Pecan Grove
Mobile Home Park. Mr. Hurwitz presented plans which included a
future RV park and a childcare facility, playground/picnic area for
residents. There are plans for a pool next to the Club house.
-10-
.
.
.
e
e
In addition he mentioned a plan to redevelop the 375' o~ frontage
considering the widening of FM 78.
Paperwork is completed on a CPS loan, at this time \J'c (!( t k'lO\.v if
it will be needed but the paperwork is completed.
6,000 cubic feet of refuse has been removed. 12 8tic~ buildings
have been removed. Most of the mobile homes that Her\,) (.'cnd,)ned by
owners have been removed. They are working on :~_T\ll::):<>ving the
appearance which will take some time. Plal1s are in ':11' woeKS to
improve the whole entrance to the property.
The Commission thanked Mr. Hurwitz for taking the t:l.me "t.o visit
and making the presentation ~ Ernie Evans, Pia ,Jarrnan f ,,,neI Steve
Simonson all commended Mr. Hurwitz on the great C}_,c,:.n-up job
already in progress.
f17 GENERAL DISCUSSION:
Tonv Moreno:
Had no comments.
Keith Van Dine:
Keith asked
the request
bandit signs
agreement in
in the bandit sign issue, if the CommisH~c1 approves
from Destiny Homes, then any busines;:' C '.n ::'(~quest
to advertise their business. The Commissioners are in
this issue.
Kei th had questions in the issue of item # 12. E:<:-:.ie Evans
explained the procedures with the Taco Cabana signage.
Keith asked if the mobile homes in the Schirmerv:Li.le area are
getting permits for the homes. Steve Simonson repliedr \res.
Garv Wallace:
Gary asked for the status of the drainage issue 5.ll. Berr'l Creek and
Woodland Oaks. Ken Greenwald commented the water 18 bacidng up to
Ashley Place and Woodland Oaks. Berry Creek SubdiviSlon is causing
the problem because of the grade that is changing the L:_ow of the
water. Don McCrary is working to alleviate the prohi.ern,
Gary brought up a concern from a neighbor ir:. ~:he~ Crer~:1shire
Subdivision. Are all the criteria being met in the development of
the subdivision. Steve Simonson replied, yes.
-11-
.
.
.
e
e
Pia Jarman:
Pia reminded the Commission about voting for TX APA
they had not already voted it is too late. The votes
been postmarked by the 22nd of September.
(,fficers if
~:iio:.11d have
Pia suggested that in the event the Chairman is not avallaDle to
sign the cover letters to BOA and City Council, would ~he Chair
have objections to her signing the cover letters as sec~etary for
the chair. The Chair had no objection, nor did the Vice Chairman.
Pia asked Steve for a status of the applications
Commissioner. There are 5 applications received ~)Q
Simonson replied. The 30th of September is the cutoff
:or
far,
da.-te.
a new
Steve
David Richmond:
David apologized for arriving late. He had no other conu~ents.
Ken Greenwald:
Ken commented City Council is taking a mini bus ~ou~ Saturday
morning to review the sidewalk issue. One concern is PM 3009.
The Council is sorting out land, at the present time :(:Y1:;- or five
si tes have been selected for Police, EMS and Fire :=>er)a:;::~:r:-,e:1.t.B.
The Christmas Committee is doing well. We have new volunt.eers.
Steve Simonson:
Steve commented letters have been sent to the Sparkle C~:c Wash on
the sign issue. The portable signs on FM 3009 are all. authorized
signs.
going
100%
the
Plan
Steve obtained a map of the right-of- way for LCRA. This is
to impact our greenbelt, Wiederstein Road. The road is a:~most
underneath the right-of-way. Steve Simonson wanted to make
Commission aware of this issue which will affect the Mdster
for the City.
Ernie Evans:
Ernie asked if there is information on the Ashley sign ~n the bank
property. Steve commented the Inspection Dept.. haCl issued a
permit for the sign.
Ernie commented on a new fence on the west side of ~:;chE:'r.::.z Parkway
in Live Oak Hills. Steve Simonson will check.
-12-
e
e
Ernie wanted to remind the Commissioners of the APA Conference.
The next meeting for Planning and Zoning is Oct 14, 1997.
.
David Richmond moved to adjourn the meeting. Pia Janl~n seconded
the motion which passed unanimously. The meeting a.clj():~:~'L\;d dt 9 :20
p.m.
/"', <::J
l "~~:'I'~/ '..... /
" Ii( r /'
L/L..)'-L~\I v . \.'-',~,,:,~;L,~li .
Chairman, Planning-and Zoning' Commission
.
ATTEST:
Planning Secretary, City of Schertz, Texas
.
-13-