02-14-1989
~ ---"-.<~"""_.~_~~'",U<""'V,,-,1=...... ,:...: '
j- - -,
PLANNING AND ZONING MINUTES
The Schert:z Planning and Zoning Commission :convened In a regular
session on Tuesday, February 14, 1989- ~t r:OO P.M. in the
Municipal Complex Conference Room, 1400 ~chertz Parkway. Those
present were as follows:
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
OTHERS PRESENT
TY BRISGILL, CHAIRMAN
MARY MARSH, VICE-CHAIRMAN
MERWIN WILLMAN
BOB ANDREWS
GEORGE VICR
JOE POTEMPA
KEN GREENWALD, COUNCILMAN
MAYOR EARL SAWYER
JIM SHRIVER, SCHERTZ
BUSINESS CLUB
JEAN V. POTEMPA
BOB MCLAREN,
CAPITAL CONVERSIONS
CHRIS TRAMPE, THE HERALD
MEMBERS ABSENT
CITY STAFF
KEITH VAN DINE, SECRETARY
STEVE SIMONSON, ASST.
CITY MANAGER
NORMA ALTHOUSE,
RECORDING SEC'Y.
#1 CALL TO ORDER
Chairman Brisgill called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.
#2 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: A. Regular Session January 24, 1989
B. Special Session February 7, 1989
A. Regular Session January 24, 1989
Bob Andrews made a motion to approve the minutes for the regular
session January 24, 1989 . Joe Potempa seconded the motion and
the vote was as follows:
AYES: M. Marsh, M. Willman, B. Andrews, G. Vick, J. Potempa
NAYS: None
ABSTENTIONS: T. Brisgill
Motion carried.
B. Special Session February 7, 1989
Mary Marsh asked that for clarification, on Page 5, Paragraph 9,
first sentence, the words "Texas Chapter" be added before
conference.
Merwin Willman made a motion to approve the minutes, as amended,
for the special session February 7; 1989. Mary Marsh seconded
- the motion and the vote was_unanimou's in favor. Motion carried.
,
13 CITIZENS' INPUT OTHER THAN AGENDA ITEMS
There was none.
#4
CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION:
of Ordinances
Proposed Change to Code
Chairman Brisgill had written up a proposed change to the code of
ordinanc~-s r'egarding the height of" fences and other fence-type
structures surrounding residential or commercial pools. Mr.
Brisgill had recommended the minimum height requirement be
changed from 4 feet to 6 feet.
Mary Marsh asked Chairman Brisgill why he wanted the height
requirement changed from 4 feet to 6 feet and Mr. Brisgill
replied because he does not think 4 feet is sufficient enough to
preserve the safety of children and animals near a pool.
Mary Marsh pointed out to Chairman Brisgill that the majority of
people with a" pool have a fenced-in yard. Mrs. Marsh further
stated it is aesthetically unattractive to have a six foot fence
around a pool when the pool is in a yard that is not fenced.
Chairman Brisgill once agaln mentioned the
said he had learned to live' with the 4
requirement here and in other areas.
safety factor, but
foot fence height
Mary Marsh commented that safety, after all, is a principal
consideration.
Referring to the 4' requirement, Steve Simonson remarked that
most normally a real small child cannot cl imb over a 4 foot
fence. Mr. Simonson went on to say there are a number of
in-ground pools and also above-ground pools where the yards have
only a chain link fence.
Merwin Willman said he knows that insurance companies require
either a 6 foot or 8 foot fence around a pool and will not insure
one with a 4 foot fence.
Mr. Willman also said he can see the point of Chairman Brisgill's
proposed change in areas where there is just a 4 foot chain link
fence, but doesn't see the need if there is already a 6 foot
pr i vacy fence, and he thinks the 0 rdinance shoul d ref 1 ect that
differentiation.
Joe Potempa acknowledged he can go along with the safety factor
of 6 foot, but wondered if this change were approved, would those
people who already have 4 foot fences have to change to 6 foot
fences.
steve Simonson replied that would be up to the Planning and
Zoning Commission.
-2-
Mary Marsh commented on the expense of changing from a 4 foot
"fence to a 6 foot fence.
Joe Potemp~asked Chairman ~risgill if he proposes to grandfather
those who already have 4 foot fences.
Mr. Brisgillreplied he left that out of his proposal on purpose
because he wal1ted to"get the thinking of the Commission.
George Vick also remarked on the expense it would involve unless
those already with 4 foot fences were grandfathered.
Merwin Willman noted they probably would be grandfathered or
perhaps a time given by which they would have to comply.
Bob Andrews informed the Commission he is in favor of a 6 foot
chain link fence on commercial property because of the extended
time periods when no one is there, but not in favor of it
necessarily in a residential area because normally someone is
there. Mr. Andrews did add, however, that he thinks there should
be some type of fencing 1n a residential area.
Mr. Andrews also said,
old enough to climb a
going to stop him.
from a safety standpoint, if a child is
4 foot fence~ then two more feet is not
Chairman Brisgill asked for a consensus from the Commission.
Councilman Greenwald asked if the present ordinance makes a fence
mandatory if you have a pool and was informed yes it does.
The consensus of the Commission was that this proposed change lS
not needed. Chairman Brisgill withdrew his proposal.
4a. CONSIDER AND TAKE APPROPRIATE ACTION: Bob McLaren, on
Behalf of Capital Conversions, Request for
an Exception to the Sign Ordinance
Bob McLaren was at the meeting to represent this request.
Bob McLaren informed the Commission his company has signed a six-
year lease on the property (approximately six acres of land and
the first building south of Keebler Cracker) and is 1n the
process of remodel ing. Mr. McLaren al so said the company has
access to the front part and will be putting in a blacktop road
through the center. The company sells closeout products.
Bob McLaren commented that part of the remodeling process
involved a 10' x 40', well-constructed, on-premise sign which is
why they are asking for a variarice to the Sign Ordinance - the
sign is larger than the ordinance allows. Mr. McLaren admitted
they should have checked on City ordinances .before going ahe~d
w-ith the sign-, but _ they didn~t and h~ has. :al.ready: paid- for it.
Mr.- McLaren- -said it is. -.a' quality sign made by Gunnarson Sign in'
-3-
,
San Marcos, all the' colors 'on .the signage and .on the building
will be coordinated, it will be the only signage separate from
the building, and because the road takes a dip in that area, they
need 'the sign for: good visibility from the interstate.
.steve Simonson asked how high the slgn will be and Bob McLaren
replied 33 feet at the very top.
Steve Simonson commented the sign does meet the height regulation
of the Sign Ordinance, but it is 150 square feet over the area
regulation.
Bob Andrews than asked how far back from the road the sign will
be located and Bob McLaren replied 20 feet from the access road.
Mary Marsh asked how far from the building the sign will be
located and Bob McLaren replied approximately 190 feet.
steve Simonson reminded the Commission there is a semi-screening
of trees between Mr. McLaren's property and Keebler.
Bob Andrews asked if the sign will be I ighted and Mr. McLaren
replied it will be indirect - there will be lights on the ground
shining on the face of the sign.
Chairman Brisgill inquired as to whether the business is
wholesale or retail and Bob McLaren replied that in the past they
had always deal t in wholesale, but they are hoping to capture
some retail business.
Bob Andrews asked Bob McLaren what the life expectancy of the
sign is projected to be and Mr. McLaren replied he would expect
it to last at least as long as the six-year lease on the
property.
Bob Andrews made a motion to grant an exception to the Sign
Ordinance to Bob McLaren for installation of a 10' x 40' on-
premise sign at 17051 IH-35 North with the stipulation that at
the end of six years, the sign be brought into compliance with
the City of Schertz Sign Ordinance.
Merwin Willman seconded the motion and the vote was unanlmous In
favor. Motion carried.
After the vote was taken, Chairman Brisgill informed Steve
Simonson he would like to have Bob McLaren fill out the City of
Schertz "Request for Sign Variance" form.
Bob Andrews welcomed Bob McLaren to the City of Schertz .arid
informed him of the current work being done-by the Schertz
Business Club regarding business input to the Sign Ordinance.
Mr. .McLaren said - he has already met Jim Shriver and plans on
~ttending the Schertz Business Club me~ting.
-4-
#5 CONSIDER AND MAKE RECOMMENDATION,: Upda'ting City Pian
A. Discussion of Civic Leaders Panel
Mary ~Marsh-, noting that City Council had appointed 9 member"s to
the. Civic Leaders Panel, asked if- they had all' been notified of
their; appointment.
Councilman Greenwald repli~,,"d he did not know, he assumed City
Manager, Mr. Sweatt, had sent them a letter.
Mary Marsh asked if everyone appointed had agreed to serve on the
panel and Mayor Sawyer replied yes they had.
Chairman, Brisgill asked if City Council had set up a timetable
for the panel to get together and it was determined they had not.
Mary Marsh asked Mayor Sawyer if Council had appointed a chairman
and Mr. Sawyer said no, the panel will work under the direction
of Planning and Zoning.
Chairman Brisgill then noted we need to asslgn two people from
Planning and Zoning to serve on the panel.
Steve Simonson asked if general guidelines and/or rules are
needed for the panel. Mr. Simonson reported that the surveys are
comlng in, but so far we have received less than 100.
Mary Marsh, reminding the Commission that a general schedule had
been set up when the idea for the survey originally went to City
Council, filled the Commission in on the way she envisions the
schedule gOlng.
Mrs. Marsh said after the final cut-off date for the surveys to
be turned in, the Staff will computerize the results and bring
them to Planning and Zoning for review. Two Planning and Zoning
members will then get together with the panel and give them the
computerized results and instructions. It will then be the work
of the panel to determine where the City wants to go. The panel
will give this information to Planning and Zoning for them to
mull over, to add, delete, etc. and then the information will go
to the department heads and to Staff.
George Vick emphasized that somewhere along the line we need to
look at the cost.
Mary Marsh said that would be the work of the department heads
and Staff and then all that information will come back to
Planning and Zoning.
Chairman Biisgill asked Mary Marsh if she -would consider being
one of the Planning and Zoning liaisons and Mrs. Marsh replied
yes.
...;;5-
t ~
Joe Potempa _ a-sked when this group will be meeting and Mary Marsh
replied probably around the second week of March.
Jim Shriver a.sked if all the surveys had been distributed and-
steve Simonson said they are in the process of being distributed.-
Mary Marsh indicated she would like for George Vick to volunteer
to be the other Planning and Zoning liaison and Mr. Vick agreed'
to do so. Mrs. Marsh said she and George Vick will have a list
of duties for the panel prepared by the next meeting.
#6 GENERAL DISCUSSION
Joe Potempa asked what the status lS on Sal vage Enterprises.
steve Simonson said Mr. Besch has been notified that Planning and
Zoning recommended denial of the request for a Specific Use
Permit. Mr. Simonson.said Mike Besch is also aware that the City
is going ahead with the prosecution on the citations.
George Vick asked about the private home on IH-35 that looks like
a junkyard and what is being done about it. Steve Simonson
replied the Staff has been busy updating and rewriting the
nuisance ordinance and junk vehicle ordinance. Mr. Simonson said
the City Manager is reviewing them at the moment and then they
will be sent to our legal advisors for further review, and if
after that they are approved and passed by City Council, then
they will be enforced vigorously.
Mary Marsh commented she would like to brief the Commission on a
new group that has been formed called the Economic Development
Task Force. Lou Borgfeld is the chairman and Chuck Sharpe is the
Vice-Chairman. The task force will consist of three teams - (1)
a marketing team which is headed by Bob Booth with Mary Marsh as
the alternate, (2) a contact team which is headed by Lee Boswell
and (3) a community relations team headed by Chuck Sharpe with
Jim Shriver as the alternate. Mrs. Marsh said they also decided
they needed a public relations person and Jim Shriver was
selected to be that person.
Mary Marsh remarked that the marketing team will be meeting
tomorrow morning with Kerry Sweatt and will begin work on a logo
and on a slogan for the City of Schertz. Mrs. Marsh said the
various teams will give their suggestions to the task force
chairman and then the suggestions will go the the Assistant city
Manager, then to the City Manager, and then to City Council.
Mary Marsh informed the Commission that Mr. Sweatt's wife will be
working on putting together a video which will promote the City.
Mrs. Marsh noted that In August - the Economic Development Task
Force will be bringing in some commercial people for a tour of
the City and a briefing.
-6-
..
. .
Bob Andrews asked if Planning.and Zohing could, as .~ courtesy, be
included in the chain of command to receive a copy of the
suggestions made by the t~Bk force. Mrs. Marsh replied y~s they
could.
Mary Marsh asked steve Simonson if he had checked on whether or
not a let.te~ was sent to the APA telling them the Co'mmission
would like more small city participation, especially in the Texas
Chapter. Mr. Simonson said he had checked and a letter was never
sent. Mrs. Marsh said that if they' can't volunteer for a
workshop this year, at least they should make their desires known
to the APA. steve Simonson said he would try and get a letter
sent to the APA.
Chairman Brisgill reminded the Commission to be thinking about
the possibility of creating a Public Use District and coming up
with a definition for adult entertainment.
Mr. Brisgill also informed the Commission he had written a letter
to the City commending the street department for their excellent
work during the icy weather.
Mayor Sawyer commented that the Grand Opening for the Jack-in-
the-Box is February 26, 1989 from 2:00 P.M. to 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Sawyer further stated that he and Mr. Sweatt will be
attending a breakfast this Thursday with the San Antonio Chamber
of Commerce.
#7 ADJOURNMENT
Chairman Brisgill adjourned the meeting at 8:04 P.M.
The next regularly scheduled meeting is February 28, 1989.
-7-